Homily on 1 Samuel 1–2 1.9–1.19

Latin text: Migne, PG 12 (Latin text: Migne, Patrologia Graeca vol. 12 (1862), transcribed from library-scan OCR of the printed volume).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0).

Show

Chapter 1

1.9PG 12:1004a–1006a

Sed videamus quali eum prece Anna , id est gratia , consecrat Deo. Novum quippe aliquid in principiis ipsis observabimus. Ait enim ἐς Et oravit Anna, et. dixit. Et nusquam eam quasi ad Deum orantem invenio, vel loquentem , nisi per duo tantum verba , ubi dicit θος Laztata sum in salutari luo, et aliud : Quia non est praeter te.» lnitium autem sic habet : Exsultavit cor meum in Domino. Non dixit, Exsultavit cor meum in te. Si enim esset oratio, ita dici consequens erat: Exsultavit eor meum in te. Et iterum in sequenti versu ejus dicit : Exaltatmn est conm meum in Deo. . Non dixit : Exaltatmn est cornu meum in te, sed in Deo. Dilatatum est es meum super inimicos, quia laetata sum in salutari tuo. Unus, ut dixi, sermo orationem continet : Ltetata sum in salutari tuo, et in consequentibus non dicit quia non est sanctus nisi tu, sed, Non est sanctus ut est Dominus, et, c Non est printer te. Hic sermo non videtur servasse orationis ordinem. In novissimis autem longa: supplicationis specie, etiam commotiones quasdam introducit, dicens ε ‹ Nolite multiplicare loqui mala, neque exeat maliloquaeitas de ore vestro, quia fortis in scientia Dominus. ln quo nec videtur jam ad Dominum loqui. Quid ergo dicemus de his? Ego eum legerem aliquando apud Apostolum quod dixit ' : Siue intermissione orate, querbam si praeceptum hoc possibile esset impleri. Quis enim potest nunquam desinere ab oratione, ita ut neque cibum , neque potum sumendi tempus habeat? quippe cum si brec fiant, intermittenda videtttr oratio. Sed nec dormiendi aut aliquid aliud lmmani usus agendi veniam secundum istud pneceptum oratio communiter intellecta concedit. Vi- α deamus ergone forte omnes actus ejus qui in divino versatur oflicio, et omnia gesta vel dicta quae secundum Deum gerit et dicit, ad orationem reportentur. Si enim oratio hoc solum intelligatur quod communiter scimus, neque Anna in his verbis orasse videbitur, et nunquam ullusjostorum secundumApostoli praeceptum sine intermissione orare potest. Si vero OllllllS actus justi , quem secundum Deum agit et secundum mandatum divinum , oratio reputatur, quia justus sine intermissione quae justa sunt agit, per hoc ‘sine intermissione justus orabit, nee unquam ab oratione cessabit: nisi justus esse desistat. Cum enim injustum aliquid agimus aut delinquimus, certum est quod eo tempore etiam ab oratione cessamus. Puto quod hoc edocemur ct in Psalmis cum dicitur : Elevatio manuum mearum sacrificium vespertiuunm Non enim puto quod si quis elevaverit vel extenderit manus ad caelum (ut habitus orantium esse solet), continuo sacrificium obtulerit Deo. Sed videamus ne forte hoc sit quod ibi indicat sermo Dei, quia per manus operaintelliguntur. Elevat manus ille, qui elevat actus suos a terra, et conversatio eius adhuc in terra ambulantis in cmlis est. Excelsi ergo actus et sublimes, quos videntes homines magnitleant Patrem caelestem, elevatip manuum dicitur, et sacriticium vespertinum. Annon et in lege id per mysterium docebatur , cum, Moyse elevante manus , vincebat Israel ις demittente vero et dejicicute deorsum , vincebat Amalec? Et si omnia haec tiguraliter contingebant illis, scripta sunt vero propter nos, in quos lines smculorum devenerunt .» Quare intelligere debemus, quia donec famulus Dei clevat actus suos ad Deum, vincit gens Dei : cum autem dcjeccrit et demiserit manu:, id est, actus suos, vincit Amalec inimicus Dei. Aut quid vidctur? (volo enim paululum immorari cum bis qui nolunt lucc spiritaliter, sed secundum litteram intelligi,) nnnquidnam putandum est , quod omnipotens Deus ad manus respiceret Moysi, et siquidem videret eas sursum elevatas, Israel victoriam darct: si vero deorsum dejectas , Ama- Bleeitis? Siccine dignum est de sancti Spiritus sentire sermoaibus? An illttd potius putandum est , quod tutura in bis mysteria praal'ormabat? Quae quidem de crucis sacramento et allixione manuum Salvatoris intelligi tritum jam, et multis Strpe dissertum est. Sed quoniam innovari semperjubetur is, qui secundum Evangeliutn vivit, et Novum Testamentum semper debet novis seusi‘ bus illustrari, et cantare Domino jubemur canticum novum, et interior homo noster non dixit Paulus quia renovatur et stetit, sed ‹ renovatur de die in diem“; oportebat etiam nos et de orationis tnodo qualiter sine intermissione orandum sit, et de elevatione manuum, quod sacrificium dicitur vespertinum, non solum usitatis et attritis, sed et aliquantulum innovatis dissertionibus explanare.

But let us see with what prayer Hannah, that is, grace, consecrates him to God. We shall notice something new at the very beginning. For it says: “And Hannah prayed and said.” Yet I nowhere find her praying, as it were, to God or speaking to him except in two phrases only, where she says, “I rejoiced in your salvation,” and the other, “For there is none besides you.” The beginning runs thus: “My heart exulted in the Lord.” She did not say, “My heart exulted in you.” For if it were a prayer, it would follow that she should say, “My heart exulted in you.” And again in the following verse she says: “My horn is exalted in God.” She did not say, “My horn is exalted in you,” but “in God.” “My mouth is enlarged over my enemies, because I rejoiced in your salvation.” One phrase, as I said, contains a prayer: “I rejoiced in your salvation”; and in what follows she does not say, “There is none holy but you,” but “There is none holy as the Lord is,” and “There is none besides you.” This wording does not seem to keep the form of prayer. At the end, under the appearance of a long supplication, she even introduces certain rebukes, saying: “Do not multiply speaking evil, nor let evil talk go out of your mouth, for the Lord is strong in knowledge.” Here she no longer seems to be speaking to the Lord. What, then, shall we say about this? Once, when I read in the Apostle that he said, “Pray without ceasing,” I asked whether this command could be fulfilled. For who can never stop praying, so as to have no time to take food or drink? For when these things are done, prayer seems to be interrupted. Nor does prayer, understood in the common way, allow under this command any leave for sleeping or for doing anything else that human need requires. Let us see, then, whether perhaps all the acts of one who is engaged in God’s service, and all the deeds and words that he does and says according to God, are to be counted as prayer. For if prayer is understood only as what we commonly know it to be, Hannah will not seem to have prayed in these words, and none of the righteous can ever pray without ceasing according to the Apostle’s command. But if every act of the righteous man that he does according to God and according to the divine commandment is counted as prayer, then, since the righteous man does what is righteous without ceasing, the righteous man will by this pray without ceasing and never cease from prayer, unless he ceases to be righteous. For when we do something unrighteous or sin, it is certain that at that time we also cease from prayer. I think we are taught this also in the Psalms, when it says: “The lifting up of my hands is an evening sacrifice.” For I do not think that if anyone lifts up or stretches out his hands to heaven (as is the usual posture of those who pray) he has thereby offered a sacrifice to God. But let us see whether this is perhaps what the word of God indicates there: that by hands works are meant. He lifts up his hands who lifts his deeds from the earth, and whose way of life, while he still walks on earth, is in heaven. Lofty and sublime deeds, then, at the sight of which people glorify the heavenly Father, are called the lifting up of hands and an evening sacrifice. Was this not taught in a mystery in the law too, when Israel prevailed while Moses lifted up his hands, but Amalek prevailed when he let them down and dropped them? “And all these things happened to them in figure, but they were written for us, upon whom the ends of the ages have come.” Therefore we ought to understand that as long as the servant of God lifts his deeds to God, the people of God prevails; but when he drops and lets down his hands, that is, his deeds, Amalek, the enemy of God, prevails. Or what do you think? (For I wish to linger a little with those who want these things understood not spiritually but according to the letter.) Must we think that almighty God looked at Moses’ hands, and if he saw them lifted up gave the victory to Israel, but if he saw them dropped down gave it to Amalek? Is it fitting to think so about the words of the Holy Spirit? Or should we not rather think that in these things he was prefiguring mysteries to come? That these things are to be understood of the mystery of the cross and the fastening of the Savior’s hands is indeed well worn and has often been discussed by many. But since one who lives according to the Gospel is commanded always to be renewed, and the New Testament ought always to be illumined with new meanings, and we are commanded to sing to the Lord a new song, and Paul did not say that our inner man is renewed and then stands still, but that it “is renewed day by day,” we too had to explain both the manner of prayer, how one is to pray without ceasing, and the lifting up of hands that is called an evening sacrifice, not only with customary and well-worn discussions but also with somewhat new ones.

1 Sam 2:1 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Sam 2:2 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Sam 2:3 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Thess 5:17 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 141:2 (140:2 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Phil 3:20 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 5:16 (allusion, high confidence) · Exod 17:11 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 10:11 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 96:1 (95:1 LXX) (allusion, medium confidence) · 2 Cor 4:16 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Since Hannah’s “prayer” mostly does not address God, Origen argues that every righteous act done according to God counts as prayer, so that the righteous pray without ceasing, and reads the lifting of hands as lifting one’s deeds.

  • Origen’s view that every righteous act is prayer (so that one can “pray without ceasing”) is also found in his treatise On Prayer; translated as written.
  • The scan garbles the end of the sentence about Amalek; it is translated by sense.
  • Sacramentum here is rendered “mystery” (the cross foreshadowed in Moses’ raised hands).

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (Migne column number leaked into the text): [4,87 → .

Topics: Prayer, Scripture and canon

Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. 1 Sam. 1.9 (PG 12:1004a–1006a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homilia-1-regnorum/1-9/#p-1-9). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homilia-1-regnorum-1-9) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from Rufinus's Latin in the Migne PG 12 scan (OCR slips corrected and logged); no public-domain English or FOTC translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.

1.10PG 12:1006a–1008a

Videamus ergo quid sibi, vult ratio ista orationis Auum, quam si didicerimus, similiter fortassis et nos orare poterimus. ς Exsultavit, inquit τ. cor meum in Domino.) Necessario addidit: «lu Domino. Est enim exsultatio quae non est in Domino,sicut et illud dicitur“: Gaudete in Potest cnim quis gaudere in carnalibus, et non in Domino. Si enim gaudeam quod ittveui thesaurum visibilem, istud gaudium carnis est, et non in Domino. Si gaudeam quod me ltomhtes laudant, et forte non pro merito, non est hoc gaudere iu Domino. Si gaudeam in rebus fragilibus et caducis, htec omnia non habent laudabile gaudium. Si vero gaudeam quoniam dignus habitus sum pro nomine Domini iujuriam pati”, istud gaudium in Domino cst, quia ipse dixit super his”: Gaudete et exsultate, quia merces vestra multa est in oculis. Si gaudeam cum odia in me exercentur iujusta, si gaudeam cum impuguor propter verbum Dei, Sl gaudeam cum castigor in languoribus, in persecutionibus, in angustiis, si haec omnia lzetus excipiam, istud gaudium in Domino est. Et ideo nos docet Scriptura, ut abjicientes gaudia terrena, tragilia ct caduca, de arternis gaudiis exsultemus in Domino, ut merito dicamus quod Anna dixit: Exsultavit cor meum in Domino. Et quoniam, cum haec dicuntur, quidam de astantibus repletus est Spiritu immundo, et exclamavit ita ut fieret. populi concursus, dicamus et nos cum Anna dicente : c Exsultavit cor meum in Domino. Contrarius spiritus exsultationem nostram in Domino ferre non potuit. sed vult eam mutare, ut ablata ‘ca introducat tristitiam, et prohibeat nos dicere: Exsultavit cor meunrin Domino.» Verum ne nos impediamnr, sed magis ac magis dicamus : Exsultavit cor meum in Domino : et pro hoc ipso quod videmus immundos spiritus flagellari, gaudeamus : quia et per haec multi convertuntur ad Dominum, multi emendantur, multi ad [idem veniunt, et nib‘il est quod sine causa iaciat Dominus, nec aliquid fieri frustra permittit. Nam quoniam multi sunt qui verbo non credunt, nec rationem doctrinas snscipiunt, in his cum dannnn insilierit, tunc convertuntur, ut ubi abundavit delictum, superabundet gratia : et ubi maligna virtus operata est, ibi plus postmodum Domini gratia operetur : quia cum expulerit Domini gratia malignum spiritum, introducit Spiritum sanctum εει anima quae repleta fuerit spiritu immundo, repletur postmodum Spiritu sancto. Ideo pro bis omnibus dicamus: «Exsultavit cor meum iu Domino. Et exaltatum est cornu meum in Deo meo. Sunt quantum cornua justorum quibus utuntur vel agentes aliquid vel loquentes, sicut cum dicunt : In te inimicos nostros ventilabimus cornu. In Grieco dicitur,quud cst cornu petemus, vel ventilabimus‘. Sed et alibi dicitur" : t Et exaltabuutur cornua justi. Oportet ergo nos habere ista cornua, quae justis de causis apicibus Christi crucis conteruntur, ut in his destruamus et dejiciamus adversarias virtutes de anima nostra, quibus prostratis et expulsis possit in nobis plantari vinea, quia vinea facta est dilecto in cornu, in loco uberi”.t Exaltatum est ergo cornu et bujusjusta: gratiae, et omnisjusti in Domino. Dilatatum est os meum super inimicos meos”.t Scriptum est" : Dilata os tuum, et adimplebo illud,» et nunc dicit hmc justa : Dilatatum est os meum.» Si idoneus et fortis fuero in verbo etTectus, et validus in sapientia, ita ut non angustis assertionibus, sed dilatatis et affluentibus confutare possim onmem scientiam extollentem se adversum (idem et verita- ι) tem Christi : vel cum incredulitatem vel perfidiam arguens Judteorum ex lege et ex pr0phetis depromptam, ostendero esse Christum Jesum, et in omnibus potero redarguere veritatis inimicos : tunc digne possum etiam ego dicere : «Dilatatum est os meum super inimicos meos.» Si mihi certamen moveat Basilides, et eum vehementer obtrivero : si Valentini discipulus occurrat et me quaestionibus ventilet, et de hoc certamine victor exiero: si his prostratis, Marcion occurrat, et discesserit etiam ipse superatus: Dilatatum est os meum super inimicos meos. Si istis confutatis occurrant philosth insultantes simplicitati fidei nostrze, et idiotas nos imperitosque clamitantes, et’ convertar etiam ad ipsos. et verte sapientiae viribus falsa: ac fucat: sapientiae nebulam obturbavero, et non solum httjus mundi, sed et principum hujus mundi sapientiam destrnxero, tunc plenius dilatatam est os menta super inimicos meos. Sancti est ergo vox istae! perfecti, qui rebus ipsis et veritate subnixum bajuscemodi sermonem possit proferre et dicere: cDilatatum est os meum super inimicos meost Oportet ergo nos primo os nostrum dilatare, tn impleat illud Deus. Quomodo autem os primo dibtamus‘l per meditationem verbi divini, ut possimus eo usque prolicere, ut a dilatatione oris etiam ad cordis dilatationem veniamus, et cum Apostolo tlicere“: Cur meum dilatatam est ad vos, ο Corinthii. Ex latitudine enim cordis abundantia ori sapienti ministratur. .

Let us see, then, what this pattern of Hannah’s prayer means; if we learn it, perhaps we too will be able to pray in the same way. “My heart exulted,” she says, “in the Lord.” She had to add “in the Lord,” for there is an exultation that is not in the Lord, as it is also said: “Rejoice in …” For one can rejoice in fleshly things and not in the Lord. If I rejoice because I have found a visible treasure, that joy is of the flesh and not in the Lord. If I rejoice that people praise me, perhaps undeservedly, this is not rejoicing in the Lord. If I rejoice in fragile and perishable things, none of these is a praiseworthy joy. But if I rejoice because I have been counted worthy to suffer insult for the name of the Lord, that joy is in the Lord, for he himself said about this: “Rejoice and exult, for your reward is great in heaven.” If I rejoice when unjust hatred is directed against me, if I rejoice when I am attacked because of the word of God, if I rejoice when I am chastised by sickness, persecution, and distress, if I receive all these gladly, that joy is in the Lord. And so Scripture teaches us to cast away earthly joys, fragile and perishable, and to exult in the Lord with eternal joys, so that we may rightly say what Hannah said: “My heart exulted in the Lord.” And since, while this was being said, one of those standing by was filled with an unclean spirit and cried out, so that the people ran together, let us also say with Hannah: “My heart exulted in the Lord.” The opposing spirit could not bear our exultation in the Lord, but wants to change it, so that by taking it away it may bring in sadness and prevent us from saying, “My heart exulted in the Lord.” But let us not be hindered; rather let us say more and more, “My heart exulted in the Lord,” and let us rejoice at this very thing, that we see unclean spirits scourged. For through these things too many are converted to the Lord, many are corrected, many come to the faith; there is nothing the Lord does without cause, and he allows nothing to happen in vain. For since there are many who do not believe the word nor accept the reasoning of doctrine, they are converted when a demon has leapt upon them, so that where sin abounded grace may abound all the more, and where the evil power has worked, there afterward the grace of the Lord may work the more. For when the grace of the Lord has driven out the evil spirit, it brings in the Holy Spirit, and the soul that had been filled with an unclean spirit is afterward filled with the Holy Spirit. Therefore, for all these things let us say: “My heart exulted in the Lord, and my horn is exalted in my God.” The righteous have, as it were, horns, which they use when they act or speak, as when they say: “In you we will toss our enemies with the horn.” In the Greek it says “we will butt with the horn,” or “we will toss.” And elsewhere it says: “And the horns of the righteous will be exalted.” We must, then, have these horns, which for just causes are joined to the arms of the cross of Christ, so that with them we may destroy and throw down the opposing powers from our soul; and when these have been laid low and driven out, a vineyard can be planted in us, for “a vineyard was made for the beloved on a horn, in a fertile place.” So the horn of this righteous woman, grace, and of every righteous person, is exalted in the Lord. “My mouth is enlarged over my enemies.” It is written, “Open your mouth wide, and I will fill it,” and now this righteous woman says, “My mouth is enlarged.” If I have become capable and strong in the word and powerful in wisdom, so that I can refute, not with narrow assertions but with broad and abundant ones, every knowledge that exalts itself against the faith and truth of Christ; or if, refuting the unbelief or faithlessness of the Jews from the law and the prophets, I show that Jesus is the Christ, and can refute the enemies of the truth in all things, then I too can worthily say: “My mouth is enlarged over my enemies.” If Basilides challenges me to a contest and I crush him vigorously; if a disciple of Valentinus meets me and tosses me with questions, and I come out of that contest the victor; if, when these have been laid low, Marcion meets me and he too goes away defeated: “My mouth is enlarged over my enemies.” If, when these have been refuted, philosophers come at me, mocking the simplicity of our faith and crying out that we are ignorant and unlearned, and I turn to them too and with the strength of true wisdom scatter the fog of false and counterfeit wisdom, and destroy the wisdom not only of this world but also of the rulers of this world, then more fully “my mouth is enlarged over my enemies.” This, then, is the voice of a holy and perfect person, who can utter such a word supported by the facts themselves and by the truth, and say: “My mouth is enlarged over my enemies.” We must therefore first enlarge our mouth, so that God may fill it. And how do we first enlarge the mouth? By meditation on the divine word, so that we can advance so far as to come from the enlarging of the mouth to the enlarging of the heart too, and say with the Apostle: “My heart is enlarged toward you, O Corinthians.” For from breadth of heart abundance is supplied to the wise mouth.

Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.

1 Sam 2:1 (quotation, high confidence) · Phil 4:4 (quotation, medium confidence) · Acts 5:41 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 5:12 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 5:20 (allusion, high confidence) · Ps 44:5 (43:6 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 75:10 (74:11 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 5:1 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 81:10 (80:11 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Cor 10:5 (allusion, high confidence) · Acts 18:28 (allusion, medium confidence) · 1 Cor 2:6 (allusion, high confidence) · 2 Cor 6:11 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Hannah’s “My heart exulted in the Lord” teaches joy in the Lord rather than in earthly things; her exalted horn and enlarged mouth stand for the power to overthrow evil powers and refute heretics and philosophers.

  • The scan omits the end of the quotation “Rejoice in …” (evidently Phil 4:4, “Rejoice in the Lord”); marked as a gap.
  • “Great in heaven”: the scan reads in oculis (“in the eyes”), evidently a slip for in caelis; translated by sense.
  • During the sermon a hearer was seized by an unclean spirit and cried out; Origen comments on the event as it happened.
  • “Joined to the arms of the cross of Christ” translates by sense an obscure phrase (apicibus Christi crucis conteruntur).
  • The remark on the Greek wording of Ps 44:5 is the translator Rufinus’s or Origen’s; the Greek has keratioumen (“we will butt”).
  • The refutation of the Jews and of Basilides, Valentinus, and Marcion is Origen’s own polemic, translated as written.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (marginal Scripture references leaked into the text): ‘Exod. xvu. 'lCor. κ, Η. → .

Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. 1 Sam. 1.10 (PG 12:1006a–1008a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homilia-1-regnorum/1-9/#p-1-10). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homilia-1-regnorum-1-10) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from Rufinus's Latin in the Migne PG 12 scan (OCR slips corrected and logged); no public-domain English or FOTC translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.

1.11PG 12:1008a–1009a

Quia laetata sum in salutari tuo." Si latatus fuero iu salutari Dei, tunc dilatatnzn est os meum super inimicos meos. Non est sano ctus sicut Dominus ’. Si scriptum esset, Non cst sanctus nisi Dominus, consequens erat omnes DD) renuntiare nobismetipsis ab hac spe ut saneti ethceremur : nunc autem necessaria distinctione etitur el. dicit: «Non est sanctus hoc est, etsi sint multi sancti, sed nullus ita sanctus est ut Dominus. Possunt ergo multi sancti fieri, sicut et mandatum Dei dicit" : Sancti estote. quoniam et ego sanctus sum. Sed quantumcunque quis iit sanctitate proficiat, quantumlibet puritatis et sinceritatis acquirat, ita esse sanctus homo aea potest sicut Dominus; quia ille largitor sanctitatis est, iste susceptor; ille sanctitatis t‘nns est, hic aatcm sancti fontis potator; ille sanctitatis lux est, hic sanctae lucis inspector; et ideo non est sanctas sicut Dominus, et non est prater te. Quid est quod dicit, «non est praeter te,» non plane capio. Si dixisset, non est Deus printer te, vel non est ereator prteter te, aut tale aliquid addidisset, nihil requirendum videbatur, nunc autem quia dicit, non est prater te, mibi ltoc videtur in loco designari, nihil eorum quae sunt, hoc ipsum quod sunt naturaliter habere. Tu solus es, cui quod es, a nullo datum est. Nos enim omnes, id est universa creatura, non eramus antequam crearemur. et ideo quod sumus, voluntas est Creatoris. Et quia aliquando non fuimus, n'on est integrum si dicatur de nobis quia sumus, quantum ad illud spectat cum non essemu-. Sed solus est Deus, qui quod est semper habuit, et non accepit ut esset initium. Denique Moyses cui: discere vellet a Deo quod ei nomen esset, docetis eum Deus dixit“ : Ego sum qui sum, ethoc mihi nomen est. Si ergo aliud aliquid in creaturis bne nomine vel hac significantia appellari posset, nunquam diceret Dominus hoc sibi esse nomen. Sciebat enim se solum esse, creaturas vero a se accepisse ut essent. Nam et umbra ad comparationem corporis non est, et fumus ad comparationem ignis non est. Sic ergo et quae in cadis sunt et quae in terra, visibilia et invisibilia, quantum ad naturam Dei pertinet, non sunt, quantum ad voluntatem Creatovis, sunt hoc quod ea esse voluit ille qui fecit. Ideo ergo dicitur, quia « praeter te, non est.

“Because I rejoiced in your salvation.” If I have rejoiced in God’s salvation, then my mouth is enlarged over my enemies. “There is none holy as the Lord.” If it had been written, “There is none holy but the Lord,” it would follow that we must all renounce the hope of being made holy; but as it is, Scripture uses a necessary distinction and says, “There is none holy as …”: that is, though there are many holy ones, none is so holy as the Lord. Many, then, can become holy, as God’s commandment also says: “Be holy, for I too am holy.” But however far anyone advances in holiness, however much purity and sincerity he acquires, a human being cannot be holy as the Lord is; for he is the giver of holiness, the other its receiver; he is the fountain of holiness, the other one who drinks from the holy fountain; he is the light of holiness, the other one who beholds the holy light. And so “there is none holy as the Lord,” and “there is none besides you.” What it means by “there is none besides you” I do not fully grasp. If it had said, “There is no God besides you,” or “There is no creator besides you,” or added something of that kind, there would seem to be nothing to inquire into; but as it says, “There is none besides you,” it seems to me to indicate in this place that none of the things that exist has by nature this very thing, that it is. You alone are he to whom what you are was given by no one. For all of us, that is, the whole creation, were not before we were created, and so that we are is the will of the Creator. And since there was a time when we were not, it is not entirely right to say of us that we are, as regards the time when we were not. God alone is he who has always had what he is, and did not receive a beginning of being. Thus when Moses wished to learn from God what his name was, God taught him, saying: “I am who I am, and this is my name.” If, then, anything else among creatures could be called by this name or with this meaning, the Lord would never say that this was his name. For he knew that he alone is, while creatures received from him that they are. For a shadow, compared with a body, is not, and smoke, compared with fire, is not. So also the things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, are not, as regards the nature of God; as regards the will of the Creator, they are what he who made them willed them to be. Therefore it is said: “Besides you there is none.”

1 Sam 2:1 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Sam 2:2 (quotation, high confidence) · Lev 19:2 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Pet 1:16 (quotation, medium confidence) · Exod 3:14 (quotation, high confidence) · Col 1:16 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: “None holy as the Lord” allows that people can become holy, though never as God is; “none besides you” means that God alone has being of himself, while creatures exist by his will.

  • Origen’s distinction between God, who alone is in himself, and creatures, which receive their being, is translated as written.
  • A run of marginal references leaked into the scan text near the end and is removed by a logged correction.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (marginal Scripture references leaked into the middle of a word): nun- ” lReg. tt, l. ‘f‘Psal. xvnt, l0. "ll ουτ. quam → nunquam.

Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. 1 Sam. 1.11 (PG 12:1008a–1009a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homilia-1-regnorum/1-9/#p-1-11). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homilia-1-regnorum-1-11) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from Rufinus's Latin in the Migne PG 12 scan (OCR slips corrected and logged); no public-domain English or FOTC translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.

1.12PG 12:1009a

Non cst potens sicut Deus, Deus noster . Simile esthoc illi quod superius dictum est, quia non est sanctus sicut Dominus. Sicut enim ibi non dixit, quia non est sanctus quisquam, sed non est sanctus sicut Dominus, ut ostenderet quia etsi sunt sancti. tamen nemo ita est sanctus ut est Dominus: ita et in hoc loco etsi sit aliquis potens, « non est, inquit. potens sicut Deus noster.

“There is none mighty as God, our God.” This is like what was said above, that “there is none holy as the Lord.” For as there it did not say that no one is holy, but that none is holy as the Lord, to show that though there are holy ones, no one is so holy as the Lord is; so in this place too, though someone may be mighty, “there is none,” it says, “mighty as our God.”

1 Sam 2:2 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: As with holiness, others may be mighty, but none is mighty as God.

  • This line belongs to the Greek text of 1 Sam 2:2.

Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. 1 Sam. 1.12 (PG 12:1009a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homilia-1-regnorum/1-9/#p-1-12). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homilia-1-regnorum-1-12) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from Rufinus's Latin in the Migne PG 12 scan (OCR slips corrected and logged); no public-domain English or FOTC translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.

1.13PG 12:1009a–1009d

«Nolite multiplicare loqui excelsa." ο Cur non dixit: Nolite loqui excelsa? Ergo licet mibi aliqua loqui excelsa, multiplicare autem excelsa et ardua non mihi licet, hoc enim videtur designari per id quod dictum est : « Nolite multiplicare loqui excelsa. ο Quid ergo per hoc indicetur, consideremus. Non permittitur humanae natura: multa excelsa loqui, neque multa excelsa intelligere. Nam et Salomon dicit“ : « Altiora te ne quaesieris, et fortiora te ne scrutere, sed de quibus tibi prmceptum est, bzec intellige. Ergo et in hoc loco dicitur « excelsa,» non ut omnino non quazras, sed ne dehis mulo tiplices quaastiones, Respicienli quippe ad litatem conditionis humanae, sufliciat tibi ea de excelsis et arduis vel inquisisse vel proloqui, quae vitam vel inquirentibus vel loquentibus tribuant. Quae autem sunt in quibus excelsa me loqui necesse est? Quando de omnipotentia Dei loquor, de invlsibilitate et sempiternitate ejus, excelsa loquor. Quando de Unigeniti ejus cozeternitate caeterisque eius mysteriis pronuntio. excelsa loquor. Quando de sancti Spiritus magnificentia dissero, excelsa loquor. In his tantum nobis conceditur loqui excelsa. Post haec tria jam nihil loquaris excelsum. Omnia enim humilia sunt et dejecta, quantum ad Trinitatis hujus celsitudinem spectat. Nolite ergo multiplicare loqui excelsa, uisi de Patre et Filio et Spiritu sancto. Et ut plenius manifestum fiat quod loquimur, utamur adhuc, si videtur, exemplis: verbi gratia gentes multos introducunt deos. Istae multiplicant loqui excelsa. Haereticorum quidam, derclinquentes creatorem mundi, et Filium ejus, fingunt sibi alium nescio quem excelsiorem deum, et alios similiter introducunt. sive quos sive quos deos appellant. Et isti ergo multiplicant loqui excelsa.

“Do not multiply speaking lofty things.” Why did it not say, “Do not speak lofty things”? It is permitted me, then, to speak some lofty things, but not to multiply lofty and difficult things; for this seems to be indicated by the words, “Do not multiply speaking lofty things.” Let us consider what is meant by this. Human nature is not permitted to speak many lofty things, nor to understand many. For Solomon also says: “Do not seek what is too high for you, and do not search out what is too strong for you; but understand what you have been commanded.” So in this place too it speaks of “lofty things,” not so that you should not inquire at all, but so that you should not multiply questions about them. Considering the frailty of the human condition, let it suffice you to have inquired into or spoken of those lofty and difficult things that bring life to those who inquire or speak. What, then, are the matters in which I must speak lofty things? When I speak of God’s omnipotence, of his invisibility and eternity, I speak lofty things. When I declare the coeternity of his Only-begotten and his other mysteries, I speak lofty things. When I discuss the majesty of the Holy Spirit, I speak lofty things. In these alone are we allowed to speak lofty things. After these three, speak nothing lofty. For all things are lowly and abased compared with the loftiness of this Trinity. “Do not, then, multiply speaking lofty things,” except about the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit. And to make what we say plainer, let us use examples, if you please. For instance, the Gentiles bring in many gods: they multiply speaking lofty things. Some of the heretics, abandoning the Creator of the world and his Son, invent for themselves some other higher god, I know not who, and likewise bring in others, whatever they call these gods. They too, then, multiply speaking lofty things.

1 Sam 2:3 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: We may speak lofty things only of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit; pagans with many gods and heretics who invent a higher god than the Creator “multiply lofty things.”

  • “Solomon” is quoted for Sir 3:21–22.
  • “Frailty” translates by sense a damaged word in the scan (…litatem).
  • The language of the Son’s “coeternity” and of the “Trinity” may reflect the translator Rufinus; it is translated as it stands.
  • The heretics who set a higher god above the Creator are probably the followers of Marcion and Valentinus named in 1.10.

Extrabiblical texts: Sir 3:21-22 (Sirach [in RC, EO, ETH canons]; quotation)

Topics: Trinity, Heresy

Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. 1 Sam. 1.13 (PG 12:1009a–1009d; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homilia-1-regnorum/1-9/#p-1-13). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homilia-1-regnorum-1-13) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from Rufinus's Latin in the Migne PG 12 scan (OCR slips corrected and logged); no public-domain English or FOTC translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.

1.14PG 12:1009d–1010a

Non exeat magniloquium de ore vestro ’°. Vide quid dictum est ab Apostolo" : «.‘lliscr ego homo, quis me liberabit «le corpore mortis lmjus ἲ» Convenit hoc dici de omni homine. Miserum namque est mortalium genus: siquidem non solum in malis, sed et in bonis periclitamur. Verbi gratia, visiones quasdam vidi bonas, facta: sunt mihi elationi. Signa et prodigia per me impleta sunt, superlms ell'ectus smn in bonis. Servavi justitiam, contiuentiam, virtutem, sed in bis periclitor. Quando enim nihil aliud fecerit zabulus, pro his omnibus suscitat mihi superbiam, ita ut postea habeam angelum Sa‘tanm qui me colaphizet, uti ne extollar et exeat magniloquium de ore meo '7, id est, ne magna de meipso loquar, quoniam quidem exterminat Dominus labia dolosa, et linguam magniloquatn eorum qui dixerunt" : « Linguam nostram magnilicavimus. Non ergo exeat magniloquluzn de ore vestro. quia fortis scientiarum Dominus.

“Let no boasting go out of your mouth.” See what the Apostle says: “Wretched man that I am! Who will deliver me from the body of this death?” This may fittingly be said of every human being. For the race of mortals is wretched, since we are in danger not only in evil things but also in good things. For example: I have seen some good visions, and they became an occasion of pride to me. Signs and wonders have been performed through me, and I have become proud in good things. I have kept righteousness, continence, virtue, but in these I am in danger. For when the devil can do nothing else, he stirs up pride in me on account of all these, so that afterward I need an angel of Satan to buffet me, lest I be exalted and boasting go out of my mouth, that is, lest I speak great things of myself; for the Lord destroys deceitful lips and the boastful tongue of those who have said, “We have magnified our tongue.” “Let no boasting, then, go out of your mouth, for the Lord is strong in knowledge.”

1 Sam 2:3 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 7:24 (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Cor 12:7 (allusion, high confidence) · Ps 12:3–4 (11:4-Ps LXX) (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: We are in danger even in good things, for the devil uses visions, miracles, and virtues to stir up pride; therefore no boasting should leave our mouth.

  • The examples in the first person (visions, signs) are hypothetical, not claims by Origen about himself.

Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. 1 Sam. 1.14 (PG 12:1009d–1010a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homilia-1-regnorum/1-9/#p-1-14). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homilia-1-regnorum-1-14) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from Rufinus's Latin in the Migne PG 12 scan (OCR slips corrected and logged); no public-domain English or FOTC translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.

1.15PG 12:1010a–1010c

Et non emen'daverunt excusantes; sicut et ibi dictum est’9 : «Non declinet cor tuum in verba mala ad excusandas excusationes in pcecatis cum hominibus operantibus iniquitateth Et in Proverbiis dicitur” : « Occasiones accipit piger et dicit : Leo est iu via , in plateis autem honzicidm. Invenimus ergo tales esse peceatores, accusantes omnia magis quam semetipsos, et occasiones sibimet excusationum tingentes, eum dicunt: Zabulns me supplantavit, mulier me seduxit, ille mihi occasionem pracsxitit ut peccarem, cum utique oporteret meminisse praecepti dicentis". « Dic tu peccata tua prior utjuStiliceris: non enim emendant excusationes, neque hic, neque in futuro, si male fecerimus. Sed et illud in excursu contingere necessarium videtur. Mirum quippe continet sensum, quia scriptum est : «Justus ipse sui accusator fit in principio sermonis sui,i cum tamen injustus non sit sui aecus-ator , sed aliorum. Sicut et Zubulus accusator quidem est, accusator autem non sui, sed fratrum. Interim omnes necesse accusari : sed si quidem justus fuero, non exspecto ut alius me accuset, sed ipse mei accusator exsisto. Plenius tamen velim discutere, quomodo potest justus sui accusator esse. Certum est quia donec quis peccat et permanet in delictis, neque jusms est, neque accusator est sui. Non enim accusat quod agit. Cum vero pmuituerit a delictis, tunc justus cllicitur, et non alterius, sed sui accusator exsistit.

“And they did not amend, making excuses.” As it is also said there: “Do not let my heart turn aside to evil words, to make excuses for sins with men who work iniquity.” And in Proverbs it says: “The lazy man takes pretexts and says, ‘There is a lion on the road, and murderers in the streets.’” We find, then, that sinners are such as accuse everything rather than themselves and invent excuses for themselves, when they say, “The devil tripped me up, the woman seduced me, that man gave me the occasion to sin,” when surely they ought to remember the commandment that says, “Tell your sins first, that you may be justified.” For excuses do not amend, neither here nor in the future, if we have done evil. But it seems necessary to touch on this too in passing, for it contains a wonderful sense, that it is written: “The righteous man is his own accuser at the beginning of his speech,” whereas the unrighteous man is the accuser not of himself but of others. So the devil too is an accuser, but not of himself: of the brothers. Meanwhile it is necessary that all be accused; but if I am righteous, I do not wait for another to accuse me, but become my own accuser. Yet I should like to discuss more fully how the righteous man can be his own accuser. It is certain that as long as anyone sins and remains in his offenses, he is neither righteous nor his own accuser, for he does not accuse what he is doing. But when he has repented of his offenses, then he becomes righteous, and is the accuser not of another but of himself.

1 Sam 2:3 (quotation, low confidence) · Ps 141:4 (140:4 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Prov 22:13 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 3:12–13 (allusion, medium confidence) · Isa 43:26 (quotation, high confidence) · Prov 18:17 (quotation, high confidence) · Rev 12:10 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Sinners excuse themselves and blame others, but the righteous accuse themselves first, as one becomes righteous by repenting and accusing oneself.

  • The words “and they did not amend, making excuses” stand in Origen’s text of 1 Sam 2:3; they are not in the Hebrew. Source uncertain.
  • “Tell your sins first, that you may be justified” is Isa 43:26 in the Greek Bible; “The righteous man is his own accuser at the beginning of his speech” is Prov 18:17 in the Greek Bible.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (Migne column number leaked into the text): peceatores, 489 accusantes → peceatores, accusantes.

Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. 1 Sam. 1.15 (PG 12:1010a–1010c; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homilia-1-regnorum/1-9/#p-1-15). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homilia-1-regnorum-1-15) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from Rufinus's Latin in the Migne PG 12 scan (OCR slips corrected and logged); no public-domain English or FOTC translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.

1.16PG 12:1010c–1011a

Arcus potentium infirmatus est . .Iacula maligni quae dicuntur ignita, per arcum potentium. emittuntur. Potentes autem virtutes dicuntur adversae, de quibus dicitur , « quia ecce peccatores intenderunt arcum, et in ipso paraverunt vasa mortis. Et iterum : « Sagittas suas ardentibus εσυcit. › Sed et nunc dicitur, quia « arcus petentium infirmatus est. › Si enim indutus sis armis Dei. si scuto fidei sis munitus et galea salutis obtectus, et lorica charitatis. et gladio spiritus accinctus , arcus contra te potentium pro munimentis talibus infirmabitur. Si enim iaculatus fuerit adversum te unum aliquod jaculum ignitum, id exceptum fidei scuto continuo restinguitur. Jccit et aliud jaculum, repulsum id quoque a thorace justitire est. Jecit et tertium, et id gladio spiritus detruncatum est. Mittit fortassis et quartum, quod similiter per galeam salutis abjectum est. Cumque per haec omnia homo Dei petitus invulnerabilis manserit, tunc arcu potentium nequaquam tot directis spiculis infirmabitur.

“The bow of the mighty is weakened.” The flaming darts of the evil one, as they are called, are shot by the bow of the mighty. The opposing powers are called mighty, and of them it is said: “For behold, sinners have bent the bow, and on it they have prepared instruments of death.” And again: “He has made his arrows for those who burn.” But now it is said that “the bow of the mighty is weakened.” For if you have put on the armor of God, if you are protected by the shield of faith and covered by the helmet of salvation and the breastplate of love, and girded with the sword of the Spirit, the bow of the mighty against you will be weakened in the face of such defenses. For if he shoots a single flaming dart at you, it is caught on the shield of faith and at once quenched. He shoots another dart: this too is driven back by the breastplate of righteousness. He shoots a third, and it is cut off by the sword of the Spirit. Perhaps he sends a fourth, and it likewise is thrown off by the helmet of salvation. And when the man of God, attacked through all of these, has remained unwounded, then the bow of the mighty, after so many shafts aimed at him, will be utterly weakened.

1 Sam 2:4 (quotation, high confidence) · Eph 6:16 (allusion, high confidence) · Ps 11:2 (10:2 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 7:13 (7:14 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Eph 6:11–17 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Thess 5:8 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The bow of the mighty, the hostile powers, is weakened against one who wears the armor of God: the shield of faith, the breastplate, the sword of the Spirit, and the helmet of salvation.

  • “Sinners have bent the bow” is Ps 11:2; “instruments of death” and “arrows for those who burn” are from Ps 7:13 (Greek Bible).

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (marginal Scripture references leaked into the text): si Cor. xit. xit. 7. [26. xvnt, l8. 1 → si .

Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. 1 Sam. 1.16 (PG 12:1010c–1011a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homilia-1-regnorum/1-9/#p-1-16). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homilia-1-regnorum-1-16) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from Rufinus's Latin in the Migne PG 12 scan (OCR slips corrected and logged); no public-domain English or FOTC translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.

1.17PG 12:1011a–1011b

Et infirmi accincti sunt fortitudine ".1 Si videamus quomodo quae stulta sunt mundi elegit Deus, ut confundat sapientes,et quae infirma mundi ιιι confundat fortia , intelligis quomodo infirmi accincti sunt fortitudine. Infirmus erat grntilis populus , quippe qui alienus erat a testamento Dei: hic adeptus est fortitudinem. Quam fortitudinem? Fortitudo mea et laudatio mea Dominus, ct factus est mihi in salutem . Fortitudo ergo mea ipse cst Christus Dominus , qua accincti sumus nos qui eramus aliquando alicui a testamento Dei, et sine Deo in hoc mundo .

“And the weak are girded with strength.” If we see how God chose the foolish things of the world to shame the wise, and the weak things of the world to shame the strong, you understand how the weak are girded with strength. The Gentile people was weak, since it was a stranger to God’s covenant; it has obtained strength. What strength? “The Lord is my strength and my praise, and he has become my salvation.” My strength, then, is Christ the Lord himself, with whom we are girded, we who were once strangers to God’s covenant and without God in this world.

1 Sam 2:4 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 1:27 (allusion, high confidence) · Exod 15:2 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 118:14 (117:14 LXX) (quotation, medium confidence) · Eph 2:12 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The weak Gentile people, once strangers to God’s covenant, are girded with strength, which is Christ the Lord.

Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. 1 Sam. 1.17 (PG 12:1011a–1011b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homilia-1-regnorum/1-9/#p-1-17). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homilia-1-regnorum-1-17) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from Rufinus's Latin in the Migne PG 12 scan (OCR slips corrected and logged); no public-domain English or FOTC translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.

1.18PG 12:1011b–1012b

Saturati panibus deducti sunt ad servitutem“. Culpabile ostendit esse saturari panibus, quia Jacob uianducavitet bibit,et repletus est,et in- ‘crassatus cst, et recalcitravit dilectus δι. t Esurienfiliis infirmata est. Patroni littera: Judzei veli. videre quomodo asserunt quod fecunda in filiis infirmatur, et sterilis quomodo peperit septem: sed illorum fabulis spretis nos consideremus. ne forte unusquisque nostrum haheat intra se sterilem qua peperit septem, habeat et fecundam in filiis qu inlinuntur. Fecunda in propagine erat caro tne: habens plurimos carnis fructus, fornicationem, inmunditiam, impudicitiam, idololatriam,veneficia, inimicitias, contentiones, aemulationes, incitationes, dissensiones ; ham erant carnis nostra: numerosae progenies. Sed cum venimus ad fidem crucis Christi, et mortificationem lesu, capimus circumferre in corpore nostro, et mortificare meum nostra quae sunt super terram, et exhibere ea servirejustitiae et sobrietati : tunc fecunditas probros: hujus generationis exclusa est, et hoc modo fecunda in filiis infirmata est. Quomodo autem sterilis septa: pariat, videamus. Sterilis erat in me anima mea, non afferebat fructus justitize : nunc autem ubi per fidem ChriSti meruit gratiam Spiritus sancti, et replevit eam spiritus sapientiae et intellectus,spiritus consilii et fortitudinis, spiritusjustitire et mi- ' scricordize, et replevit eam spiritus timoris Domini“ : certum est quod sterilis peperit septem, et fecunda in filiis infirmata est.

“Those full of bread have been brought down into servitude.” It shows that to be full of bread is blameworthy, for “Jacob ate and drank and was filled and grew fat, and the beloved kicked.” “The hungry … in children has become weak.” I should like to see how the Jews, the champions of the letter, explain how she who is fruitful in children is made weak, and how the barren one has borne seven. But setting aside their fables, let us consider whether perhaps each of us has within himself the barren woman who has borne seven, and also the woman fruitful in children who is made weak. My flesh was fruitful in offspring, having very many fruits of the flesh: sexual immorality, impurity, indecency, idolatry, sorcery, enmities, strife, jealousies, provocations, dissensions. These were the numerous offspring of our flesh. But when we came to faith in the cross of Christ, and began to carry about in our body the dying of Jesus, to put to death our members that are on earth, and to present them to serve righteousness and sobriety, then the fruitfulness of this shameful generation was shut off; and in this way she who was fruitful in children was made weak. Let us see how the barren one bears seven. My soul was barren within me; it bore no fruits of righteousness. But now that through faith in Christ it has merited the grace of the Holy Spirit, and the spirit of wisdom and understanding, the spirit of counsel and strength, the spirit of righteousness and mercy has filled it, and the spirit of the fear of the Lord has filled it, it is certain that the barren one has borne seven and she who was fruitful in children has been made weak.

Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.

1 Sam 2:5 (quotation, high confidence) · Deut 32:15 (quotation, high confidence) · Gal 5:19–21 (allusion, high confidence) · 2 Cor 4:10 (allusion, high confidence) · Col 3:5 (allusion, high confidence) · Rom 6:19 (allusion, high confidence) · Isa 11:2–3 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The fruitful woman made weak is the flesh with its many vices, put to death through faith in the cross; the barren woman who bears seven is the soul filled with the sevenfold Spirit.

  • Words are lost in the scan after “The hungry” (1 Sam 2:5, which goes on: “… have ceased to hunger, for the barren has borne seven, and she who is many in children has become weak”); marked ….
  • The remark about the Jews as “champions of the letter” and their “fables” is Origen’s own polemic, translated as written.
  • The list of the seven spirits follows Isa 11:2–3 loosely (righteousness and mercy in place of knowledge and piety).

Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. 1 Sam. 1.18 (PG 12:1011b–1012b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homilia-1-regnorum/1-9/#p-1-18). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homilia-1-regnorum-1-18) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from Rufinus's Latin in the Migne PG 12 scan (OCR slips corrected and logged); no public-domain English or FOTC translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.

1.19PG 12:1012b

Dominus mortificat et vivificat δ’. mortificat Dominus, et quem vivificat? Lleipsuu tuortificat, cum me mortuum facit esse peccato.£t meipsum vivificat, cum me facit vivere Deo. Petcator eram, et in delictis vivebam : mortifiwit me a peccatis, mori me fecit vitae priori, et vivificabit me ut in timore suo vivam, ut in fide sua stem, ut ultra non vivam peccato, sed Deo, quinte a mortuis suscitavit, ιιι iu novitate vitae ambulet: in Christo Jesu Domino nostro, cui est gloriaetiaperiqu in saacula sazculorum. Amen.

“The Lord puts to death and makes alive.” Whom does the Lord put to death, and whom does he make alive? He puts me to death when he makes me dead to sin, and he makes me alive when he makes me live to God. I was a sinner and lived in offenses. He put me to death to sins, he made me die to my former life, and he will make me alive, so that I may live in his fear, stand in his faith, and live no longer to sin but to God, who raised him from the dead, so that I may walk in newness of life in Christ Jesus our Lord, to whom be glory and dominion for ages of ages. Amen.

1 Sam 2:6 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 6:11 (allusion, high confidence) · Eph 2:1 (allusion, medium confidence) · Rom 6:4 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Pet 4:11 (echo, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The Lord puts us to death by making us dead to sin and makes us alive by making us live to God in newness of life.

Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. 1 Sam. 1.19 (PG 12:1012b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homilia-1-regnorum/1-9/#p-1-19). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homilia-1-regnorum-1-19) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from Rufinus's Latin in the Migne PG 12 scan (OCR slips corrected and logged); no public-domain English or FOTC translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.