Homilies on Numbers 9.6–10.3
Latin text: Migne, PG 12 (Latin text: Migne, Patrologia Graeca vol. 12 (1862), transcribed from library-scan OCR of the printed volume).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0).
Chapter 9
9.6PG 12:630a–633b
Et cessauit inquit vastatioe vel, ut in aliis exemplaribus legi diximus: eonfractio e, quod et magis interpretationi conveniet veritatis; confractio namque est , quae velut in vasis fictilibus eflicitur. Peccatorcs ergo vasa fictilia fiunt, sicut Jeremias propheta designat itt Lantentationibus ", dicens: Filii Sion, qui erant honorabiles et in auro elati, quomodo reputati sunt in vasa fictilia, Opera manuum figuli? Et: In domo magna non sunt, inquit Apostolus , tantummodo vasa aurea , et argentea, scd et lignea et fictilia: et alia quidem ad honorem, alia autem ad contumeliam. ε Sunt ergo vasa fictilia ad contumeliam, quae et confringi possunt. Sed consideremus diligentius quid in consequentibus Apostolus de ipsis vasis fictilibus dicat: σ Si quis, inquit ’, emundavcrit semetipsum ab iis, crit vas ad honorem sanctificatum, et utile Domino ad omne opus bonuut paratum. In quo ostendere videtur, quod et vas ipsum quod fit, et per quem fit, unus atque idettt homo sit. lntcllige ergo propositum quidem hominis essequod operatur : reliquam autent partem hominis ipsum esse vas, quod fit vel ad honorem, vel contumeliam. Cum ergo sensus noster quae bona sunt eligit, etatl bonam nos conversationem trahit, facit nos vas utile. Cum autent neglexerit, et deciderit propositum nostrum a bonis, efficimur vas ad contumeliam. Si ergo intellectus noster luteus sit, et de luto semper ac de terrenis cogitet, efficimur vas fictile, et opus manuum figuli. Et forte propter hoc iste qui talis est, increpatur ab Apostolo, quasi qui sensum habcns luteum et terrenum, de magnis et iis quae capere non potest, quaerat et dicat : Quid ergo adhuc conqueritur? Voluntati enim ejus quis resistit?» Cui Apostolus quasi luteo respondit ” : Tu quis es, ο homo, qui contra respondeas Deo ? Nunquid dicit figmentum ei qui se finxit, Quid me fecisti sic? Dicitur prteterea corpus nostrum vas fictile, sive etiam legis littera, in eo quod ait Apostolus ο : Habentes autem thesaurum lnmc in vasis fictilibus. Utrumque enim in hoc sermone accipi potest, et quod in corpore nobis positis thesaurum gratia: per Spiritum sanctum Dominus largiatur, et quod in sermonibus legis, qui viles et in contemptu habentur pro eo quod nulla arte grammatica expoliti videntur, reconditus sit thesaurus sapientia: et scientiae Dei; ita ut merito dici possit, quod in ipsis sint thesauri sapientia), et scientia: Dei absconditi . Haec nobis dicta sint dc confractione, quae cessasse memoratur; nunc autem pauca etiam …
“And the destruction ceased,” it says, or, as we said it reads in other copies, “the breaking,” which will better suit the interpretation of the truth; for breaking is what happens to clay vessels. Sinners, then, become clay vessels, as the prophet Jeremiah indicates in Lamentations, saying: “The sons of Zion, who were honorable and exalted in gold, how they are reckoned as clay vessels, the works of the potter's hands!” And: “In a great house,” says the Apostle, “there are not only vessels of gold and silver, but also of wood and clay, some for honor and some for dishonor.” There are, then, clay vessels for dishonor, which can also be broken. But let us consider more carefully what the Apostle says next about these clay vessels: “If anyone,” he says, “cleanses himself from these, he will be a vessel for honor, sanctified, useful to the Lord, prepared for every good work.” In this he seems to show that the vessel that is made and the one by whom it is made are one and the same man. Understand, then, that a man's purpose is what does the work, while the rest of the man is the vessel itself, which is made either for honor or for dishonor. When, then, our mind chooses what is good and draws us to good conduct, it makes us a useful vessel. But when it has neglected this, and our purpose has fallen away from good things, we are made a vessel for dishonor. If, then, our understanding is of mud and always thinks of mud and earthly things, we are made a clay vessel and the work of the potter's hands. And perhaps for this reason one who is such is rebuked by the Apostle as one who, having a muddy and earthly mind, inquires into great things which he cannot grasp, and says: “Why then does he still find fault? For who resists his will?” To him the Apostle answered as to one made of mud: “Who are you, O man, to answer back to God? Does the thing formed say to him who formed it, Why have you made me thus?” Moreover, our body is called a clay vessel, or also the letter of the law, where the Apostle says: “But we have this treasure in clay vessels.” For both can be taken from this saying: both that the Lord bestows the treasure of grace through the Holy Spirit on us while we are placed in the body, and that in the words of the law, which are held cheap and in contempt because they seem polished by no grammatical art, the treasure of the wisdom and knowledge of God is hidden; so that it may rightly be said that in them are hidden the treasures of the wisdom and knowledge of God. Let this be what we say about the breaking, which is said to have ceased; but now also a few things …
Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.
Num 16:48 (17:13 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Lam 4:2 (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Tim 2:20 (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Tim 2:21 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 9:19 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 9:20 (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Cor 4:7 (quotation, high confidence) · Col 2:3 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Sinners are clay vessels for dishonor that can be broken, but whoever cleanses himself becomes a vessel for honor; the clay vessel also figures the body and the plain letter of the law, which hold the treasure of God's grace and wisdom.
- The end of this section, which introduced Num 17:2–5 (LXX 17:17–20), is lost in the scan; Baehrens's edition is legible only as far as “a few things,” and the rest is marked “…”.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne column number in the text): 299 quidem → quidem.
Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Num. 9.6 (PG 12:630a–633b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-numeros/9-6/#p-9-6). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-numeros-9-6) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 12, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged; sections and lost lines from Baehrens, GCS 29–30, where noted); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
9.7PG 12:633b
Et locutus est Dominus ad Moysen dicens: Loquere filiis Israel, … ab iis virgam … domos familiarum ipsorum, ab omnibus principibus ipsorum duodecim virgas; et uniuscujusque eorum nomen scribe in virga sua : et nomen Aaron scrib: in virga Levi : est enim virga una (Ξ), per tribum, per domos familiarum suarum dabunt tibi. Et pones eas in tabernaculum testimonii contra arcam, ex quibus agnoscar tibi inde. Et erit homo quemcunque elegero, virga ejus germinabit, et auferam a tenturmurationem filiorum Israel : in quibusmuque murmurant ipsi de vobis. Omnis princeps nibus et populi habet virgam. Non enim potest quis regere populum, nisi habeatvirgam. Unde et Paulus apostolus, quia princeps erat p0puli, idcirco ificcbat : Quid vultis? In virga veniam ad vos, an in charitate, spirituque mansuetudinis ”? Si ergo princeps tribuum habeat necesse est virgam suam, sed unus solus cst, sicut Scriptura refert, pontifex Aaron cujus virga germinavit. Verumqueniam, ut saepe ostendimus, verus pontifex Christus est, ipse solus est, cujus virga crucis non solum germinavit, sed et floruit, et omnes hos credentium populorum attulit fructus. Quis autem iste est frcctus, quem attulit? Nuces, inquit, qui fructus primo quidem indumento amarus est : sequenti munitur et tegitur. Tertio sumentem pascit ac nutrit. Tatii ergo est in auditorio Christi doctrina legis et prophetarum. Prima littera: facies satis amara εει, quae circumcisionem carnis praecipit, quae de sacriliciis mandat, et caetera quae per occidentem lineo ram designantur. Haec omnia tanquam amarum nucis corticem projice. Secundo in loco ad munimenta testa: pervenies, in quo vel moralis doctrina, vel ratio continentiae. designatur. Quae necessaria quidem sunt ad custodiam eorunt quae servantur intrinsecus, frangenda quandoque tamen et sine dubio dissolveuda sunt. Ut si verbi gratia dicamus, abstinentia ciborum, et castigatio corporis. dent! smnus in corpore isto corruptibili et possibili, sine dubio necessaria est. Cum autetn confractum lue. rit ac resolutum, et resurrectionis tempore incorruptibile ex corruptibili redditum, atque ex animali spiritale : non jam labore afilictionis, nec ab! tiucutiae castigatione, sed qualitate, nulla jamcorpori corruptela dominabitur. Sic ergo et uiuit necessaria abstinentia: ratio videtur, et postmodum non quzerenda. Tertio autem loco reconditum in iis invenies et secretum mysteriorum sapientia: ct scientia: Dei sensum, quo nutriantur et pastanlllr animae sanctorum non solum itt prmsenti vita,sol tiam, in futura. Iste enim est pontificalis fructus, de quo promittitur his, qui esuriunt et sitiunt iustitiam, quoniam saturalmntnr . Hoc igitur modo in Scripturis omnibus triplicis hujus sacramenti ratio percurrit. Sic et Sapientia monet , ut describamus eanobis in corde tripliciter, ad respondendum, inquit, verbum veritatis iis qui proposuerint nobis. Sic tres puteos fodit lsaac patriarcha : quorum solus ille tertius ab eo latitudo vel amplitudo nominatur. Quia autem sacramentum sacerdotale est virga nucis, idcirco arbitror etiam Jeremiam , qui erat unus de sacerdotibus ex Anathoh, vidisse virgam noceam, et prophetasse de ea illa quae scripta sunt vel de virga nucea, vel de lebete, sive de olla succensa : quasi si ostenderet per haec invirga nucea esse vitam, etin lebete succenso esse mortem. Vita enim et mors ponitur ante faciem nostram. Et‘est vita quidem Christus in sacramento aucis: mors antem diabolus in figura lebetis suecensi. Si ergo peccaveris, portionem tuam pones cum lebete succenso; si autem juste egeris, efficietur portio tua in virga nucea cum magno pontilire. Sed et in Canticis canticorum sponsa descendere dicitur in hortum nucis, ubi etiam pariter cum nucibus saccrdotalium quodammodo pontorum copiam perscribitur invenisse. Verumtamen de virgis, ut dicere coeperamus, unum promisit Deus frnctnm in virga, et plures dedit. Sed attendite diligentius, si forte possimus liberalitatem Dei largiorem etiam ipsis suis promissionibus edoccre : si forte et ex iisillam ineffabilem bonitatem Dei qua: in Scriptura: littera semper tegitur, rimari atque investigare poterimus, cum largiorem in praestando, quam in promittendo videamus.
“And the Lord spoke to Moses, saying: Speak to the sons of Israel, [and take] from them a rod for each house of their families, from all their leaders, twelve rods; and write each one's name on his rod; and write Aaron's name on the rod of Levi; for there is one rod for each tribe; by the houses of their families they shall give them to you. And you shall put them in the tabernacle of testimony before the ark, where I shall make myself known to you. And it shall be that the man whom I choose, his rod shall sprout, and I will take away from you the murmuring of the sons of Israel, with which they murmur against you.” Every leader of a tribe and of a people has a rod. For no one can rule a people unless he has a rod. Hence the apostle Paul too, because he was a leader of the people, said: “What do you wish? Shall I come to you with a rod, or in love and a spirit of gentleness?” If, then, each leader of the tribes must have his own rod; but there is only one, as the Scripture relates, the high priest Aaron, whose rod sprouted. But since, as we have often shown, the true high priest is Christ, he alone it is whose rod of the cross not only sprouted but also blossomed, and bore all these fruits of believing peoples. And what is this fruit that it bore? Nuts, it says: a fruit whose first covering is bitter; by the second it is protected and covered; the third feeds and nourishes the one who takes it. Such, then, in the school of Christ is the teaching of the law and the prophets. The first face of the letter is bitter enough: it commands circumcision of the flesh, gives orders about sacrifices, and the other things that are designated by the letter that kills. Throw all these away like the bitter rind of the nut. In the second place you will come to the protection of the shell, in which either moral teaching or the principle of self-control is designated. These are necessary for guarding what is kept within, yet at some time they must surely be broken and dissolved. For example, abstinence from foods and chastisement of the body are doubtless necessary as long as we are in this corruptible and passible body. But when it has been broken and dissolved, and at the time of the resurrection made incorruptible from corruptible and spiritual from natural, no corruption will any longer rule the body, not through the labor of affliction nor through the chastisement of abstinence, but by its very quality. So the principle of abstinence seems necessary now, and afterward not to be sought. But in the third place you will find hidden in them the secret meaning of the mysteries of the wisdom and knowledge of God, by which the souls of the saints are nourished and fed not only in the present life but also in the future. For this is the high priest's fruit, of which the promise is made to those who hunger and thirst for righteousness, that they shall be satisfied. In this way, then, the principle of this threefold sacrament runs through all the Scriptures. So too Wisdom admonishes us to write them down in our heart threefold, so as to answer, it says, a word of truth to those who put questions to us. So the patriarch Isaac dug three wells, of which only the third was named by him “breadth” or “room.” And because the rod of the nut tree is a priestly sacrament, I think that for this reason Jeremiah too, who was one of the priests of Anathoth, saw a rod of the nut tree and prophesied about it what is written, either about the rod of the nut tree or about the cauldron, the boiling pot: as if showing through these that in the rod of the nut tree is life, and in the boiling cauldron death. For life and death are set before our face. And life is Christ in the sacrament of the nut, while death is the devil in the figure of the boiling cauldron. If, then, you sin, you will set your portion with the boiling cauldron; but if you act righteously, your portion will be in the rod of the nut tree with the great high priest. And in the Song of Songs too the bride is said to go down into the garden of nuts, where, together with the nuts, she is described as having found an abundance of fruits that are in some way priestly. However, concerning the rods, as we had begun to say, God promised one fruit on the rod and gave several. But attend more carefully, in case we can perhaps show that God's liberality is more generous even than his own promises; in case from these too we can search out and investigate that ineffable goodness of God which is always covered in the letter of Scripture, since we see him more generous in giving than in promising.
Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.
Num 17:2 (17:17 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Num 17:3 (17:18 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Num 17:4 (17:19 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Num 17:5 (17:20 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 4:21 (quotation, high confidence) · Num 17:8 (17:23 LXX) (allusion, high confidence) · 2 Cor 3:6 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 9:27 (allusion, medium confidence) · 1 Cor 15:42 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:44 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 5:6 (quotation, high confidence) · Prov 22:20 (quotation, high confidence) · Prov 22:21 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 26:22 (allusion, high confidence) · Jer 1:1 (allusion, high confidence) · Jer 1:11 (allusion, high confidence) · Jer 1:13 (allusion, high confidence) · Deut 30:15 (allusion, high confidence) · Song 6:11 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Aaron's rod bearing nuts figures Christ's cross and the threefold sense of Scripture (the bitter letter, the protective moral teaching, and the nourishing hidden mystery), and God, who promised only that the rod would sprout, gave more than he promised.
- Part of the quotation of Num 17:2–5 (LXX 17:17–20) is lost in the scan; it is supplied from Baehrens's edition as far as the copy available can be read, and the unreadable words are marked “…” or, where the sense is clear, supplied in brackets. Num 17:8 has “almonds” in the Hebrew; the Greek and Latin have “nuts,” on which the allegory rests. “Write them threefold” is Prov 22:20–21 in the Greek; the wells are Gen 26:18–22; the rod of the nut tree (almond) and the boiling pot are Jer 1:11–13. “An abundance of fruits” renders a garbled word, probably pomorum (Song 6:11).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (stray footnote marker): (ὅ) Christi → Christi; dominabitur (σί). → dominabitur..
Topics: Scripture and canon
Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Num. 9.7 (PG 12:633b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-numeros/9-6/#p-9-7). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-numeros-9-7) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 12, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged; sections and lost lines from Baehrens, GCS 29–30, where noted); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
9.8PG 12:633b–634b
Igitur sermo Scriptura: de qua nunc loquimur ita habet: Eterit, inquit, homo quemcunque elcgero, virga ejus germinabit . Hoc est solum quod promisit Deus, ut virga ejus quem elegerit, germinet. Ubi vero ad rem venitur ut quod prornissum est ostendatur impletum : non unum illud quod promissum fuerat effectum dicitur, sed vide quanta addantur. Ait enim : Et ecce germinavit Virga Aaron in domo Levi ο. Est hoc unum illud sine dubio quod fuerat repromissum; sed adduntur et alia, et dicitur : Et produxit frondes et protulit flores, et germinavit nuces δι. Cum ergo de solo germine fuisset promissum, vide quanta largi. tur Deus, ut non solum germen produxerit, sed et frondes; et non. solum frondes, sed et flores; et germinaverit non solum flores, sed et fructus. Quid igitur est quod ex iis colligere et contemplari debeamus? Primo omnium resurrectionis ex mortuis sacramentum. Virga enim arida germinat, cum corpus exstinctum ctcperit reviviscere. Quae sunt autem quatuor ista quae resurgenti corpori priestabuntur? Ut seminatutn in corruptione, surgat in incorruptione; et seminatum in infirmitate, surgat in virtute; et seminatqu in ignominia, surgat in JL'I‘. gloria : et seminatum corpus animale, surgat corpus spiritale δ’. Ista sunt quatuor quae virga aridi corporis nostri in resurrectione germinahit. Sed et illud secundo in loco dicemus; quia, sicut in iis promissionem suam Deus in clitadruplum dedit et multo plura et pretiosiora largitus est quam promisit, ita tnulto magis in omnibus Scriptum locis, nhi aliqua Dei promissio continetur, si quis tamen ad eam pervenire mereatur, in futuro multipliciter praeparabitur; et sic vere complebitur illud quod Apostolus dicit , quia ε oculus non vidit, nec auris audivil, nec in cor hominis ascendit, quae praeparavit Deus iis qui diligunt eum. Vide ergo quanta sint, et qualia, quae non solum videre et audire nemini licnit, sed ne in cor quidem, id est ad cogitationem humanam potuit ascendere. Sive ergo terram, sive omium dixeris, sive solem hunc et fulgorem visibilis luminis, omnia hazc oculos vidit, et auris audivit : et non possunt esse ex illis quae oculus non vidit, nec auris audivit, nec itt cor hominis ascendit. Transgredere ergo hmc omnia, et transcende omne quidquid vides, quidquid audis, quidquid etiam cogitare potes, et illud scito esse repositum iis qui diligunt Deum, quod nec ad cogitationem cordis tui quivit ascendere. Unde ego arbitror nihil in hujusmodi repromissionibus de rebus corporalibus cogitandum. ltatio enim materia: corporalis non usquequaque sensum huznana: cogitationisrffngere potest, sed illa suntque: ad nullius sensum, nullius cor possunt ascendere quae in sola Dei sapientia continentur. Etenim videbitur hac rati0ne quod promissionum bona majori modo quam promissa sunt, dantur : similiter et poma: quae peccatoribus comminantur, multiplicatis cruciatibus itil'erendte sunt; sicut etin superioribus, ubi anuus pro die ad vindictam ponitur, exposuimus : nisi si quis tertium aliquid posse fieri c0gitet, colligens aliqua solatia ex iis quae in comminatione ea, quae ad David facta est δ”, continentur: ubi triduo pronuntiata est mortis futura: vastatio, et intra sex horas abbreviatum videtur tempus esse supplicii. Sed haec tibi prolicere possunt, ubi poenitentiae tempus et satisfactionis conceditur locus. Scribitur “ tatneu Deus malis quidem reddens in tertiam et quartam progeniem bonis autem faciens misericordiam non solum in tertiam et quartam progeniem, sed, ut Scriptura dicit, in mille generationes.
The wording of the Scripture we are now speaking of, then, runs thus: “And it shall be,” it says, “that the man whom I choose, his rod shall sprout.” This is the only thing God promised: that the rod of the one he chose would sprout. But when it comes to the event, so that what was promised may be shown to be fulfilled, not only is that one promised thing said to have happened, but see how much is added. For it says: “And behold, the rod of Aaron of the house of Levi had sprouted.” This is doubtless that one thing which had been promised; but other things are added, and it is said: “And it put forth leaves and brought forth blossoms and produced nuts.” Since, then, the promise had been only of a sprout, see how much God bestows: the rod produced not only a sprout but leaves; not only leaves but blossoms; and not only blossoms but fruits. What, then, ought we to gather and contemplate from this? First of all, the sacrament of the resurrection from the dead. For the dry rod sprouts when the dead body has begun to come back to life. And what are these four things that will be granted to the rising body? That what is sown in corruption rises in incorruption; what is sown in weakness rises in power; what is sown in dishonor rises in glory; and what is sown a natural body rises a spiritual body. These are the four things which the rod of our dry body will put forth in the resurrection. And in the second place we shall say this too: that just as in these God gave his promise fourfold and bestowed much more and more precious things than he promised, so much more, in all the places of Scripture where any promise of God is contained, if anyone deserves to attain it, it will be prepared many times over in the future; and so will truly be fulfilled what the Apostle says, that “eye has not seen, nor ear heard, nor has it entered into the heart of man, what God has prepared for those who love him.” See, then, how great and of what kind those things are which it has been granted to no one not only to see and hear, but which could not even enter the heart, that is, human thought. Whether, then, you speak of the earth, or of heaven, or of this sun and the brightness of visible light, the eye has seen all these and the ear has heard; and they cannot be among those things which eye has not seen, nor ear heard, nor have entered the heart of man. Pass beyond all these, then, and transcend whatever you see, whatever you hear, whatever you can even think, and know that what is laid up for those who love God is that which could not even enter the thought of your heart. Hence I think that in promises of this kind nothing is to be thought of in terms of bodily things. For the nature of bodily matter cannot altogether escape the sense of human thought; but those things which can enter no one's sense and no one's heart are the ones contained in the wisdom of God alone. And indeed by this reasoning it will seem that the good things of the promises are given in greater measure than they are promised; and likewise the punishments threatened against sinners are to be inflicted with multiplied torments, as we explained above, where a year is set for a day as punishment: unless someone thinks that some third possibility can happen, gathering some consolation from what is contained in the threat made to David, where a devastation of death for three days was announced, and the time of punishment seems to have been shortened to within six hours. But these things can profit you where a time of repentance and a place of satisfaction is granted. Yet God is written as repaying the wicked to the third and fourth generation, but showing mercy to the good not only to the third and fourth generation but, as Scripture says, to a thousand generations.
Num 17:5 (17:20 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Num 17:8 (17:23 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:42 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:43 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:44 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 2:9 (quotation, high confidence) · Num 14:34 (allusion, high confidence) · 2 Sam 24:13 (allusion, high confidence) · 2 Sam 24:15 (allusion, high confidence) · Exod 20:5 (allusion, high confidence) · Exod 20:6 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The rod's sprout, leaves, blossoms, and nuts figure the fourfold glory of the resurrection body and show that God's promised goods surpass all that can be seen or imagined.
- Num 17:5 and 17:8 are LXX 17:20 and 17:23. The “six hours” of David's punishment reflects the Greek of 2 Sam 24:15 (“from morning until the hour of the midday meal”). The reference back to “a year for a day” is to 8.1.
Topics: Eschatology
Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Num. 9.8 (PG 12:633b–634b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-numeros/9-6/#p-9-8). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-numeros-9-8) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 12, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged; sections and lost lines from Baehrens, GCS 29–30, where noted); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
9.9PG 12:634d–635b
Sed redeamus ad ea quae de virgis dicere cmperantus. Possumus adhuc etiam sic intelligere eorum quae in virga germinaverant, differentias. 0mnis qui in Christo credit, primo moritur, et post hoc renascitur : et est etiam haec figura, quod virga arida postmodum germinat. Est ergo primum germen prima hominis in Christo confessio. Secundo , frondescit, ubi renatus donum gratiae Dei ex Spiri- ἓ tus sancti purificatione susceperit. Inde aflert flores, ubi prolicere coeperit, et morum suavitate decorari, ac l'ragrantiam misericordia: et benignitatis efl'undere. Ad ultimum quoque afl'ert etiam fructus iustitiae, quibus non solum ipse vivat, sed et aliis praebeat vitam. Ctnn enim ad perfectum venerit, et protulerit ex se verbum fidei, verbum scientiae Dei, et alios lucrifeccrit, hoc est attulisse fructus quibus alii nutriantur. Sic ergo singuli quique credentium de virga Aaron, qui Christus est, germinantur; quorum quatuor ista: differentia: in aliis Scriptum locis velut aetates quatuor designantur, quas Joannes apostolus in Epistola sua distinctione mystica comprehendit, ait enim ς Scribo vobis, pueri, et, α scribo vobis, adolescentes, et, scribo vobis, patres. › In quibus utique non corporales aetates, sed anima: prolectuum dill'erentias ponit, ut etiam hoc sacerdotalis virgae germine observavimus designari. [labentur ergo haec omnia non tam in virga Aaron, quam in ea virga quae exiit de radice Jesse : et flos de radice ejus ascendit, super quem requievit spiritus Dei ". In quo nec hoc ipsum videtur otiosum qttod exire dicitttr virga, et flos ascendere. Quamvis enim unus sit Christus per substantiam, singulis tamen diversus efficitur, prout indiget is in quo operatur. Qui ergo segnior est et negligentior, pro disciplina lit ei Christus virga, et in virga non ascendere dicitur, sed exire. Exeundum namque est ei qui iners et segnis est de eo statu in quo non. recte consistit, et transeundum ad alium statum, tanquam virga α compulso, id est severitate doctrinae rigidioris admonito. Qui vero justus est, quia justus sicut palma floret , in hoc ascendere dicitur Christus. Sic ergo qui verberibus indiget, exit ad eum virga; qni autem prolicit ad justitiam, ascendit in florent. Ascendet autem usqueqno afl‘erat fructus spiritus, qui sunt eharitas, gaudium, pax, patientia ", et reliqua: virtutes in Christo Jcsu Domino nostro, cui est honor, et gloria, et imperium in saecula saeculorum. Amen.
But let us return to what we began to say about the rods. We can also understand the differences among the things that had sprouted on the rod in this way. Everyone who believes in Christ first dies and after this is reborn; and this too is figured by the dry rod's sprouting afterward. The first sprout, then, is a man's first confession in Christ. Second, he puts forth leaves, when, reborn, he has received the gift of God's grace from the purification of the Holy Spirit. Then he brings forth blossoms, when he has begun to advance and to be adorned with sweetness of character and to pour out the fragrance of mercy and kindness. Last of all he also bears fruits of righteousness, by which he not only lives himself but also gives life to others. For when he has come to perfection and has brought forth from himself the word of faith, the word of the knowledge of God, and has won others, this is to have borne fruits by which others are nourished. So each of the believers sprouts from the rod of Aaron, which is Christ; and these four differences are designated in other places of Scripture as four ages, which the apostle John comprehends in his letter by a mystical distinction, for he says: “I write to you, children,” and, “I write to you, young men,” and, “I write to you, fathers.” In these he certainly sets out not ages of the body but differences in the soul's progress, as we observed is designated by the sprouting of the priestly rod. All these things, then, are found not so much in the rod of Aaron as in that rod which came forth from the root of Jesse; and the flower rose from his root, on which the Spirit of God rested. In this, not even the very fact that the rod is said to come forth and the flower to rise seems idle. For although Christ is one in substance, he nevertheless becomes different for each, according as the one in whom he works needs. To one who is more sluggish and negligent, then, Christ becomes a rod for discipline, and as a rod he is said not to rise but to come forth. For one who is idle and sluggish must come forth from the state in which he does not rightly stand and pass to another state, as if driven by a rod, that is, admonished by the severity of a sterner teaching. But for one who is righteous, because “the righteous will flourish like the palm,” in this Christ is said to rise. So to one who needs blows he comes forth as a rod; but for one who advances in righteousness he rises as a flower. And he will rise until he bears the fruits of the Spirit, which are love, joy, peace, patience, and the other virtues, in Christ Jesus our Lord, to whom is honor and glory and dominion for ages of ages. Amen.
Rom 6:4 (allusion, medium confidence) · 1 John 2:12 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 John 2:13 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 11:1 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 11:2 (allusion, high confidence) · Ps 92:12 (91:13 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Gal 5:22 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The rod's four stages figure the believer's growth from first confession to bearing fruit for others, and Christ, the rod from Jesse's root, comes as discipline to the sluggish and as a flower to the righteous.
- The four stages of growth are compared with the ages in 1 John 2:12–14. Ps 92:12 is LXX 91:13.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's footnotes in the text; word rejoined): llo- "Cant. vr. 3’ Num. xvtt, 5. res → flores.
Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Num. 9.9 (PG 12:634d–635b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-numeros/9-6/#p-9-9). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-numeros-9-9) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 12, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged; sections and lost lines from Baehrens, GCS 29–30, where noted); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
Chapter 10
10.1PG 12:635b–638a
Qui meliores sunt, inferiorum semper culpas ct peccata suscipiunt. Sic enim et Apostolus dicit ἰε ε Vos qui firmiores estis, imbecillitates infirmorum sustinete.» Israelita si peccet, id est laicus, ipse suum non potest auferre peccatum; sed requirit levitam, indiget sacerdote, imo potius et adhuc horum aliquid eminentius quaerit : pontifice opus cet est, g ut peccatorum remissionem possit accipere. Sacerdos autem si delin- quat aut pontifex, ipse suum potest purgare peccatum, si tamen non peccet in Deum. De hnjusmodi enim peccatis non lacile remissionem aliquam videmus in legis litteris designari. llaec autem diximus pro iis qute recitata sunt nobis : ἰ Et dixit, inquit, Dominus ad Aaron dicens : Tu et lilii tui, et domus patris tui tecum sumetis peccata sanctorum.» Potest quidem ita exponi locus istc; ut per ea quae oflert pontilu pro peccato uniuscujusque, et purificat eum pro quo obtulerit, scriptum sit : Tu et lilii truncum sumetis peccata sanctormn. Mihi autem non ridetur otiosum quod sanctorum peccata commemorat. ln multis etenim Scriptum locis sermo iste repttitur. Unde requirendum est, quomodo et sancti dicantur aliqui, et de peccatis e0rum scrilatar. Non enim, ut putant quidam, statim ut quis snetus esse Peccal‘c iam 0W!!tinuo sine peccato putandus est. Si enim saturus non peccaret, non utique scriptum esset : «Suriactis peccata sanctorum. › Si sanctus sine peccato esset, non diceret Dominus per Ezechielem prophetam ad angelos, quos mittebat peccatores pnnire "‘"_: ‹ Et a sanctis meis incipietis.» Si enim sancti sine peccato sunt, quomodo ipsi primi sctcumbunt suppliciis peccatorum? Si sancti sine peccato essent, nunquam diceret Scriptura “, quia «justus in principio sermonis sui ipse sui accusitor lit. Si sancti sine peccato essent, nunquam Paulus apostolus diceret, Romanis seruiens"; Nolite pr0pter cibum solvere opus Deiuquibas in principio Epistolas scripserat “ : t Omnibusqui sunt Romae dilectis Dei, vocatis sanctis. Et ite rum idem Apostolus ad Corinthios scribens, dicit". Paulus vocatus apostolus Jesu Christi; et put pauca : ε Ecclesiae Dei quae est Corinthi, sanctificatis in Christo Jcsu, vocatis sanctis. Istos ergo quos sanctiflcatos et sanctos appellat, audi quam: in eis peccata reprehendat. Ait enim in sequentibus" : Cum enim sint inter vos aemulationes et contentiones, nonne carnales estis, et secundum hominem ambulati's? Et iterum ": Jam diritas η lacti estis, sine nobis regnatis, et utinam regum- ξ tis! Et iterum“o : Tanquam autem non me ad vos inflati sunt quidam. ν Et paulo post“: Omnino auditur inter vos fornicatio, et talis br- Ῐ) nicatio, qualis nec inter gentes. ln consequentibus vero δ’ : Et vos, inquit, inflati estis, et tum potius luctum habuistis. ln quo utique uallat! reliquit immunem, dum aliis fornicationis. et superbiae crimen adscribit. Notat eos et in sequentibus etiam de indiciis et dieit: iam quidem omnino delictum a ; vobis, quia iudicia habetis inter vose. Arguit eos, quos sanctos dis erat, et pro eo, quod idolis immolata manducent, et quasi senten- Man inter eos proferens dieit: Sic autem peccantes inter fratres, et percutieutes conscientiam earum infirmant, in Christum peccatis. Sed et de eo nihilominus confutat eos, quod non solum immolatitium cibum, sed et calicem daemoniorum praesumant, et dicit”: iNon potestis calicem Domini bibere, et calicem ’ daemoniorum : non potestis mensae Domini participes esse, et mensae daemoniorum. lpsis etiam illud dicit “ : Quod convenientibus vobis in Ecclesia, audio schismata essen Et iterum : quisque enim suam caenam praesumit ad manducandum :et alius quidem esurit , alius autern ebrius est. Et pro iis delictis dicit : Propterea inter vos multi infirmi, et argri, et dormiunt multi. Quod si nos ipsos dijudicaretnus, non utique judicaremur. Post haec autem non jam delicta moralia, sed fidei in eis crimen exaggerat. Ait enim : Quomodo dicunt inter vos quidam quod resurrectio mortuorum non sit?» Et iterum ἠε Si autem Christus non resurrexit, vana est fides vestra. Adhuc enim estis in peccatis ve3tris. Longum porro est, nec praesenti conveniens tempori, ut plurima de iis testimonia proferamus, quibus probetur quod ii qui sancti dicuntur, non continue etiam sine peccato esse intelligantur; sed haec opinentur illi qui Scripturis divinis non sollicite, nec diligenter intendunt: in quibus multa: esse difi‘erealize sanctorum docentur, sicut a nobis et in aliis tractatibus plenius dictum est. Sed et nunc quantum locus requirit, dicemus. Sancti dicuntur iidemque et peccatores illi qui se voverunt quidem Deo et sequestravernnt a vulgi conversatione vitam suam ad hoc ut Domino serviant. Hujusmodi ergo homo secundum hoc, quod se caeteris actibus circumcisis Domino mancipavit, sanctus dicitur. Potest autem fieri, ut in hoc ipso quod Domino deservit, non ita omnia gerat ut geri competit, sed delinquat in nonnullis, et peccet. Sicut enim is qui sequestrat se, et segregat ab omnibus actibus, ut disciplinam, verbi gratia,-medicinaa aut philosopliize consequatur, non utique continuo ut se ltujusmodi tradiderit disciplinis, ita perfectus erit, ut non ’ inveniatur in aliquo peccare: into potius plurima delinquendo vix ad perfectionem aliquando perveniet; et tamen Statim ut se ad huiusmodi scholas tradidit, certum est eum vel inter medicos, vel inter philosophos numerari; ita ct de sanctis accipiendum est quod statim quidem ut mancipat se quis studiis sanctitatis, secundmn hoc quod proposuit, sanctus appelletur. Secuudum hoc vero quod necesse est eum in multis delinquere, donec usu et disciplina ac diligentia abscindatur ab eo consuetudo peccandi, etiam peccator, ut supra diximus, appellabitur. Ego autem et amplius addo aliquid, quod nisi sanv ctum propositum aliquis habeat, et sanctitatis studium gerat, cum peccaverit, nescit peccati paenitudinem gerere, nescit delicti remedium quaerere. Qui non sunt sancti, in peccatis suis moriuntur: qui sancti sunt, pro peccatis pmoitudinem gerunt, vulnera sua sentiunt, intelligunt lapsus, requirunt sacerdotem, sanitatem deposcunt, purificationem per pontificem quaerunt. Idcirco ergo caute et significanter‘sermo legis designat, quia pontifices et sacerdotes, non quorumcunque, sed sanctorum tantummodo sumant peccata; sanctus enim est qui peccatum suum per pontificem curat.
Those who are better always take on the faults and sins of their inferiors. For so the Apostle too says: “You who are stronger, bear the weaknesses of the weak.” If an Israelite, that is, a layman, sins, he cannot take away his own sin; but he looks for a Levite, he needs a priest, or rather he seeks something still more eminent than these: he needs the high priest, in order to receive remission of sins. But if a priest or the high priest offends, he can purge his own sin, provided he does not sin against God; for of sins of that kind we do not easily see any remission indicated in the letter of the law. We have said these things because of what was read to us: “And the Lord spoke to Aaron, saying: You and your sons and your father's house with you shall bear the sins of the holy ones.” This passage can indeed be expounded so that “You and your sons with you shall bear the sins of the holy ones” is written on account of the offerings that the high priest makes for the sin of each, purifying the one for whom he has offered. But it does not seem idle to me that it mentions the sins of the holy ones, for this expression is repeated in many places of Scripture. Hence we must ask how some are called holy and yet their sins are written of. For it is not the case, as some think, that as soon as someone has begun to be holy he is at once to be thought to be without sin. For if the holy one did not sin, it would surely not be written, “You shall bear the sins of the holy ones.” If the holy one were without sin, the Lord would not say through the prophet Ezekiel to the angels whom he was sending to punish sinners: “And begin from my holy ones.” For if the holy are without sin, how are they the first to succumb to the punishments of sinners? If the holy were without sin, the Scripture would never say that “the righteous is his own accuser at the beginning of his speech.” If the holy were without sin, the apostle Paul, writing to the Romans, would never say, “Do not for the sake of food destroy the work of God,” to those to whom at the beginning of the letter he had written: “To all who are in Rome, beloved of God, called holy.” And again, the same Apostle, writing to the Corinthians, says: “Paul, called an apostle of Jesus Christ,” and a little after: “To the church of God which is at Corinth, to those sanctified in Christ Jesus, called holy.” Hear, then, how many sins he rebukes in these whom he calls sanctified and holy. For he says in what follows: “For when there is jealousy and strife among you, are you not carnal and walking according to man?” And again: “Already you have become rich; you reign without us; and would that you did reign!” And again: “Some are puffed up, as though I were not coming to you.” And a little after: “It is actually reported that there is sexual immorality among you, and such sexual immorality as is not found even among the Gentiles.” And in what follows: “And you,” he says, “are puffed up, and did not rather mourn.” In this he certainly left no one exempt, charging some with the crime of sexual immorality and others with that of pride. He rebukes them also in what follows about lawsuits, and says: “It is already altogether a fault among you that you have lawsuits among you.” He reproves those whom he had called holy also for eating things sacrificed to idols, and, as if passing sentence among them, says: “Thus, sinning against the brothers and wounding their weak conscience, you sin against Christ.” And no less he refutes them for presuming to take not only food sacrificed to idols but also the cup of demons, and says: “You cannot drink the cup of the Lord and the cup of demons; you cannot partake of the table of the Lord and the table of demons.” To them he also says: “When you come together in the church, I hear that there are divisions.” And again: “For each one takes his own supper first in eating, and one is hungry and another is drunk.” And for these offenses he says: “For this reason many among you are weak and sick, and many sleep. But if we judged ourselves, we would not be judged.” After this he heightens against them a charge no longer of moral faults but of faith. For he says: “How do some among you say that there is no resurrection of the dead?” And again: “But if Christ has not been raised, your faith is vain; for you are still in your sins.” It would take long, and would not suit the present time, to bring forward the very many testimonies about these things by which it might be proved that those who are called holy are not on that account to be understood to be without sin; let that be the opinion of those who do not attend carefully and diligently to the divine Scriptures, in which it is taught that there are many differences among the holy, as we have said more fully in other treatises too. But we shall speak of it now too, as far as the passage requires. Those are called holy, and at the same time sinners, who have vowed themselves to God and have separated their life from the conduct of the crowd in order to serve the Lord. Such a man, then, in so far as he has cut off his other activities and given himself over to the Lord, is called holy. But it can happen that in this very service of the Lord he does not do everything as it ought to be done, but offends in some things and sins. For just as one who separates and withdraws himself from all activities in order, for example, to acquire the discipline of medicine or of philosophy is certainly not, as soon as he has given himself to such disciplines, at once so perfect that he is found to err in nothing; rather, by erring very often he will scarcely reach perfection at some time; and yet, as soon as he has given himself to such schools, it is certain that he is counted among the physicians or among the philosophers: so too it must be understood of the holy, that as soon as someone gives himself over to the pursuits of holiness, he is called holy according to his purpose; but because he must offend in many things until by practice, discipline, and diligence the habit of sinning is cut off from him, he will also be called, as we said above, a sinner. And I add something further: unless someone has a holy purpose and pursues holiness, when he has sinned he does not know how to repent of the sin, does not know how to seek a remedy for the offense. Those who are not holy die in their sins; those who are holy repent of their sins, feel their wounds, understand their falls, seek the priest, ask for healing, seek purification through the high priest. Therefore the word of the law carefully and significantly indicates that high priests and priests bear the sins not of just anyone but only of the holy ones; for the holy one is he who treats his sin through the high priest.
Rom 15:1 (quotation, high confidence) · Lev 4:27 (allusion, medium confidence) · 1 Sam 2:25 (allusion, medium confidence) · Num 18:1 (quotation, high confidence) · Ezek 9:6 (quotation, high confidence) · Prov 18:17 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 14:20 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 1:7 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 1:1 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 1:2 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 3:3 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 4:8 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 4:18 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 5:1 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 5:2 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 6:7 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 8:12 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 10:21 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 11:18 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 11:21 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 11:30 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 11:31 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:12 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:17 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The priests “bear the sins of the holy ones” because those called holy still sin, as Paul's letters to the Corinthians show, and only those who pursue holiness seek healing for their sins through the high priest.
- “If he sins against God” recalls 1 Sam 2:25. “The righteous is his own accuser at the beginning of his speech” is Prov 18:17 in the Greek. A Migne column number and footnote marker stand in the scan where part of 1 Cor 11:31 and a following phrase are lost. Words lost in the Migne scan are supplied from Baehrens's edition.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's footnotes in the text; word rejoined; stray numerals): 13175 et superbiae → et superbiae; stu— Cur. "Apoc. vt. dium → studium.
Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Num. 10.1 (PG 12:635b–638a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-numeros/9-6/#p-10-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-numeros-10-1) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 12, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged; sections and lost lines from Baehrens, GCS 29–30, where noted); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
10.2PG 12:638a–639a
Sed redeamus ad pontificem nostrum, pontificem magnum qui penetravit caelos, Jesum Dominum nostrum; et videamus quomodo ipse cum filiis suis, apostolis scilicet et martyribus, sumit peccata sanctorum. Et quidem quod Dominus noster Jesus Christus venerit ut tolleret peccatum mundi, et morte sua peccata nostra deleverit, nullus qui Christo credit, ignorat. Quomodo autem et filii ejus auferant peccata sanctorum, id est apostoli et martyres, si poterimus, ex Scripturis divinis probare tentabimus. Audi primo Paulum dicentem : Libenter enim, inquit , expendam, et expendar pro animabus vestris; etin alio loco : Ego enim jam itnmolor, inquit”, et tempus regressionis,» sive tresolutionis mea: instat. Pro iis ergo quibus scribebat, expendi se et immolari dicit Aposmlus. Hostia autem cum immolatur, ad hoc immolatur ut eorum pro quibus iugulatur, peccata purgentur. De martyribus autem scribit Joannes apostolus in Apocalypsi", quia anima: eorum qui jugulati sunt propter nomen Domini Jesu, assistunt altari ; qui autem assistit altari , ostenditur fungi sacerdotis officio. Sacerdotis autem officium est, pro populi supplicare peocatis. Unde ego vereor, ne forte ex quo martyres non fiunt, etliostiae sanctorum non offeruntur pro peccatis nostris, peccatorum nostrorum remissionem non mereamur. Et ideo vereor, ne permanentibus in nobis peccatis nostris, accidat nobis illud quod de seruetipsis dicunt Judmi, quia non habentes altare, neque templum, neque sacerdotium, et ob hoc nec hostias offerentes, peccata, inquit, nostra manent in nobis; et ideo venia nulla subsequitur. Et contra, nos dicere debemus, quia hostiae martyrum non oiferuntur pro nobis, idcirco manent in nobis pec: cata nostra ; non enim meremur persecutionem pati propter Christum, nec mori propter nomen Filii Dei. Et ideo etiam diabolus, sciens per passionem martyrii remissionem fieri peccatorum, non vult nobis publicas gentilium persecutiones movere: scit enim, quia si ad rcges et praesides adducamur propter nomen Christi, ad testimonium Judmis et gen-tibus, gaudium nobis et exsultatio sit, quia merces nostra multa in cmlis est. ilzrc non facit inimicus, vel quod ipse gloria: invidet, vel fortassis quod ille qui omnia praevidet, praenoscit nos non esse idoneos ad martyrium tolerandum. Scit tamen Dominus qui sunt ejus, et in quibus non speratur, habet ille thesauros suos : enim sicut homo videt, ita et Deus”. Ego non dubito et in hoc conventu esse aliquos ipsi soli cognitos, qui iam apud eum martyres sint testimonio conscientiae, parati, si quis esposcat, eflundere sanguinem suum pro nomine Domini Jesu Christi; non dubito esse aliquos qui tulerint crucem suam, et sequantur eum. [lare liret per excessum nuemdam, necessario tamen videntur dicta, ut intelligercmus quomodo per pontificem, et filios pontificis fiat in sanctis remissio peccatorum.
But let us return to our high priest, the great high priest who has passed through the heavens, Jesus our Lord, and see how he, with his sons, that is, the apostles and martyrs, bears the sins of the holy ones. That our Lord Jesus Christ came to take away the sin of the world and blotted out our sins by his death, no one who believes in Christ is unaware. But how his sons too, that is, the apostles and martyrs, take away the sins of the holy ones, we shall try, if we can, to prove from the divine Scriptures. Hear first Paul saying: “I will most gladly spend and be spent for your souls”; and in another place: “For I am already being offered,” he says, “and the time of my return,” or “of my departure, is at hand.” The Apostle says, then, that he is spent and offered for those to whom he was writing. But when a victim is offered, it is offered so that the sins of those for whom it is slain may be purged. And of the martyrs the apostle John writes in the Apocalypse that the souls of those who were slain for the name of the Lord Jesus stand at the altar; and one who stands at the altar is shown to perform the office of a priest. And the office of a priest is to supplicate for the sins of the people. Hence I fear that perhaps, since martyrs are not being made and the victims of the saints are not being offered for our sins, we may not deserve the remission of our sins. And therefore I fear that, as our sins remain in us, there may happen to us what the Jews say of themselves: that, having no altar, nor temple, nor priesthood, and therefore offering no victims, “our sins,” they say, “remain in us,” and therefore no pardon follows. And we, on the contrary, must say that because the victims of martyrs are not offered for us, therefore our sins remain in us; for we do not deserve to suffer persecution for Christ or to die for the name of the Son of God. And therefore the devil too, knowing that remission of sins comes about through the suffering of martyrdom, does not wish to stir up public persecutions by the Gentiles against us; for he knows that if we are brought before kings and governors for the name of Christ, as a testimony to the Jews and to the Gentiles, it is joy and exultation for us, because our reward is great in heaven. The enemy does not do this, either because he envies the glory, or perhaps because he who foresees all things foreknows that we are not fit to endure martyrdom. Yet the Lord knows those who are his, and among those in whom it is not expected he has his treasures; for God does not see as man sees. I do not doubt that in this assembly too there are some, known to him alone, who are already martyrs before him by the testimony of their conscience, ready, if anyone demands it, to pour out their blood for the name of the Lord Jesus Christ; I do not doubt that there are some who have taken up their cross and follow him. These things, though said by a kind of digression, nevertheless seemed necessary, so that we might understand how remission of sins comes about among the holy through the high priest and the sons of the high priest.
Heb 4:14 (quotation, high confidence) · John 1:29 (allusion, high confidence) · 2 Cor 12:15 (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Tim 4:6 (quotation, high confidence) · Rev 6:9 (allusion, high confidence) · Hos 3:4 (echo, low confidence) · Matt 10:18 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 5:12 (allusion, high confidence) · 2 Tim 2:19 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Sam 16:7 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 16:24 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Christ takes away sin, and his “sons,” the apostles and martyrs, share in bearing the sins of the holy by offering themselves; Origen fears that in a time without martyrs the church lacks this help.
- The view that the martyrs' deaths serve for the remission of others' sins is Origen's (compare his Exhortation to Martyrdom 30) and is translated as written. The words attributed to the Jews are quoted as Origen gives them; their source is unidentified. A Migne footnote has been removed by logged correction.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's footnotes in the text): ibid. et 51. Cor.xv, 12. "° ibid. 17. quod ille → quod ille.
Extrabiblical texts: Origen, Mart. 30 (Exhortation to Martyrdom; echo)
Topics: Martyrdom, Persecution
Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Num. 10.2 (PG 12:638a–639a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-numeros/9-6/#p-10-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-numeros-10-2) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 12, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged; sections and lost lines from Baehrens, GCS 29–30, where noted); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
10.3PG 12:639a–640b
Sequitur post lucc: Et tu, inquit , et filii tui accipietis peccata sacerdotii vestri : et fratres tuos tribuum Levi, plebem patris tui assume ad te, et adjungantur tibi, et ministrent tibi : et tu et lilii tui tecum in conspectu tabernaculi testimonii observabunt custodias tuas tabernaculi. Observare diligentius, etintendere iis quae scripta sunt, convenit eos praecipue qui in ordine sacerdmali gloriantur; ut sciant quid est quod eis lcx divitia pnecepit observandum. Tu, inquit, et filii tui tecum in conspectu tabernaculi observate custodias vestras, et altare, et custodias tabernaculi. lllaudata quidem certa sunt et evidentia, ut observare debeamus custodias tabernaculi, et altaris, et sacerdotii ;qttis sane sit qui observet, et faciatca qua: sacerdotibus tnatulata sunt ; et quis sitqui utatur quidem ordine et honore sacerdotii, Opera vero et mysterium sacerdotii non observet, ille solus nosse potest, qui scrutatur corda et rencs . Mandantur observari non solum ea quae foris sunt, Sed et ea, inquit , ut curent sacerdotes prmcipne quae intra velamen sunt; velut si diceret: cura sit sacerdotibus, evidentia ac manifesta mamlata divinae legis implere, et mysteria ejus abscondita et velata omni perspicacia contueri. Si vero ad hominem velis referre tabernaculum testimonii; _ quOniam quidem corpus hominis tabernaculum Paulus appellat, dicens : Qui enim sumus in tabernaculo hoc, gemimus aggravati ; in quo nolumus exspoliari, sed supervestiri ; si ergo ad hominem tabernaculum referamus , interiora velaminis, ubi inaccessibilia conteguntur, principale cordis dicemus, quod solum recipere potest mysteria veritatis, et capax esse arcanorum Dei. Altaria vero duo, id est interius et exterius, quoniam altare orationis indicium est, illud puto significare quod dicit Apostolus" ; Orabo spiritu, orabo et mente.» Cum enim corde oravero. ad altare interius ingreo dior. Et hoc puto esse quod etiam Dominus in Evangeliis dicit “: ί Tt! autem cum 0m. intra in cubiculum tuum, et claude OSllunt ttttltn,elon patrem tuum in abscondito. Qui ergo ita oratu dixi, ingreditur ad altare incensi quod est interius. Cum autem quis clara voce, ct verbis cum sono prolatis, quasi ut aedificet audientes, cntionem fundit ad Deum, hic spiritu orat, et olierrc videtur hostiam in altari quod foris est ad bolocaustomu populi constitutum. Oportet ergo sarerdotesez curare prmcipue et custodire, quae intra relatae: interius conteguntur, ne quid ibi pollutum, ne quid inveniatur immundum; hoc est interiorem lion;netn, et cordis secreta curare, ut ibi inuuarulau permaneant. Cherubim et prOpitiatorium, scientia intelligenda est Trinitatis ; interpretatio enim Cherubim multitudinem, id est perfectionem scienti: indicat g9) : et quae cst alia perfectio, nisi agrovisse Patrem et Filium, et Spiritnnt sanctum? llrc ergo curanda sunt ita a sacerdotibus, ut incontatninata et illaesa serventur. Sed et urna bal-cus cmlestem cibum manum, theSaurus utique est redii divini. Et arca aurea, in qua sunt tabula: Iesumenti, ut opinor, non aliud quam mens nostra esse declaratur, in qua legem Dei debemus Inter: descriptam. llazc autem mens aurea debet esst, hoc est pura et pretiosa, in qua legem Dei descriptam semper habeamus, sicut Apostolus dicit “z Scriptum non atramento, sed spiritu Dei viri; non in tabulis lapideis, sed in tabulis cordis rarnalibus. Hoc est enim qttod etde quibaslam dicitur qui ostendunt opus legis scriptum in (oro dibus suis . Quis autem scripsit in tarditas eorum, nisi Deus digito suo ? Legem utique naturalem quam dedit Deus humano generi, et in wactorum mentibus scripsit : unde et initia sumimus, ac semina quaedam ad perscrutandam capimus reritatcm : quae semina si bene excolamus, fructum vita: afl‘erent in nobis in Christo Jesu Domino nostro, cui est gloria et imperium in szecula sactlorum.
After this follows: “And you,” it says, “and your sons shall bear the sins of your priesthood; and your brothers of the tribe of Levi, the people of your father, take to yourself, and let them be joined to you and minister to you; and you and your sons with you before the tabernacle of testimony shall keep your charges of the tabernacle.” It befits especially those who glory in the priestly order to observe more carefully and attend to what is written, so that they may know what the divine law has commanded them to observe. “You,” it says, “and your sons with you, before the tabernacle, keep your charges, and the altar, and the charges of the tabernacle.” The commands are certain and evident, that we must keep the charges of the tabernacle, of the altar, and of the priesthood; but who truly keeps and does what is commanded to priests, and who enjoys the rank and honor of the priesthood but does not keep the works and the mystery of the priesthood, he alone can know who searches hearts and reins. They are commanded to keep not only the things that are outside, but also, it says, that the priests should take special care of what is within the veil; as if to say: let the priests take care to fulfill the evident and plain commands of the divine law, and to contemplate its hidden and veiled mysteries with all insight. But if you wish to refer the tabernacle of testimony to man, since Paul calls the body of man a tabernacle, saying, “For we who are in this tabernacle groan, being burdened, because we do not wish to be unclothed but to be further clothed”: if, then, we refer the tabernacle to man, we shall say that the inner part within the veil, where the inaccessible things are covered, is the ruling part of the heart, which alone can receive the mysteries of the truth and be capable of the secrets of God. And the two altars, the inner and the outer, since the altar is a sign of prayer, I think signify what the Apostle says: “I will pray with the spirit, I will pray also with the mind.” For when I pray with the heart, I enter the inner altar. And I think this is what the Lord too says in the Gospels: “But you, when you pray, go into your room, shut your door, and pray to your Father in secret.” Whoever prays thus, as I said, enters the altar of incense, which is within. But when someone pours out prayer to God in a clear voice and with words uttered aloud, as if to edify the hearers, he prays with the spirit and seems to offer a victim on the altar outside, set up for the whole burnt offering of the people. The priests, then, must take special care of and guard what is covered within the veil, that nothing polluted, nothing unclean be found there; that is, they must care for the inner man and the secrets of the heart, so that these may remain undefiled. The cherubim and the mercy seat are to be understood as the knowledge of the Trinity; for the interpretation of “cherubim” indicates a multitude, that is, a perfection, of knowledge: and what other perfection is there than to have known the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit? These things, then, must be so cared for by the priests that they are kept uncontaminated and unharmed. And the urn holding the heavenly food, the manna, is surely the treasure of the divine word. And the golden ark, in which are the tablets of the covenant, is declared, I think, to be nothing other than our mind, in which we ought to have the law of God written. And this mind ought to be golden, that is, pure and precious, so that we may always have the law of God written in it, as the Apostle says: “Written not with ink but with the Spirit of the living God, not on tablets of stone but on tablets of fleshly hearts.” For this is what is said also of certain people who show the work of the law written in their hearts. And who wrote it in their hearts but God with his finger? Surely the natural law, which God gave to the human race and wrote in the minds of all; from it we take our beginnings and receive certain seeds for searching out the truth; and if we cultivate these seeds well, they will bring forth in us the fruit of life in Christ Jesus our Lord, to whom is glory and dominion for ages of ages.
Num 18:1 (quotation, high confidence) · Num 18:2 (quotation, high confidence) · Num 18:3 (quotation, high confidence) · Num 18:5 (allusion, medium confidence) · Ps 7:9 (7:10 LXX) (allusion, high confidence) · Num 18:7 (allusion, high confidence) · 2 Cor 5:4 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 14:15 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 6:6 (quotation, high confidence) · Heb 9:4 (allusion, high confidence) · Heb 9:5 (allusion, high confidence) · 2 Cor 3:3 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 2:15 (quotation, high confidence) · Exod 31:18 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Priests must keep both the outward commands and the hidden mysteries within the veil, and in each person the inner sanctuary is the heart, where prayer, the knowledge of the Trinity, and God's law written on the mind are to be guarded.
- In this passage praying “with the spirit” is aloud for others' edification, and praying “with the mind” is the silent prayer of the heart, as printed.
Topics: Church office, Prayer, Trinity
Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Num. 10.3 (PG 12:639a–640b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-numeros/9-6/#p-10-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-numeros-10-3) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 12, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged; sections and lost lines from Baehrens, GCS 29–30, where noted); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.