Letters 120.8–120.10

Latin text: Hilberg, CSEL 54–56 (Latin text: Isidor Hilberg (CSEL 54–56, 1910–1918), digitized by Open Greek and Latin, University of Leipzig (csel-dev), CC BY-SA 4.0).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0). Compare: Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, series 2, vol. 6 (1893).

Show

Chapter 120

120.8CSEL 55:489–492

Quid significet, quod in euangelista Matheo scriptum est:. Iesus autem clamans uoce magna emisit spiritum. et uelum templi scissum est in duas partes a summo usque deorsum et terra mota est et petrae scissae sunt et monumenta aperta sunt et multa corpora sanctorum, qui dormierant, resurrexerunt et exeuntes de monumentis post resurrectionem eius uenerunt in sanctam ciuitatem et apparuerunt multis. — Et de hoc loco in isdem commentariis disseruimus. primumque dicendum, quod diuinae potentiae indicium sit ponere animam, quando uoluerit, et rursum accipere eam. denique centurio uidens eum dixisse ad patrem: in manus tuas commendo spiritum meum et statim sponte spiritum dimisisse commotus signi magnitudine ait: uere dei filius erat iste. uelum quoque templi scissum est in duas partes, ut conpleretur id, quod refert Iosephus praesides templi dixisse uirtutes: transeamus ex his sedibus. in euangelio autem, quod Hebraicis litteris scriptum est, legimus non uelum templi scissum, sed superliminare templi mirae magnitudinis conruisse. terra, inquit, mota est — pendentem dominum suum ferre non sustinens — et petrae scissae sunt — ut indicarent duritiam Iudaeorum, qui praesentem dei filium intellegere noluerunt — et monumenta aperta sunt — in signum futurae resurrectionis — multaque sanctorum corpora exeuntia de sepulchris uenerunt in sanctam ciuitatem et apparuerunt multis. sanctam ciuitatem Hierosolymam debemus accipere ad distinctionem omnium ciuitatum, quae tunc idolis seruiebant; in hac enim sola fuit templum et unius dei cultus et uera religio. et non omnibus apparuerunt, sed multis, qui resurgentem dominum susceperunt. Dein iuxta άναγωγήν dicendum, quod clamante Iesu et emittente spiritum suum uelum templi scissum sit in duas partes a summo usque deorsum et omnia legis reuelata mysteria, ut, quae prius recondita tenebantur, uniuersis gentibus proderentur. in duas autem partes, in uetus et nouum instrumentum, et a summo usque deorsum, ab initio mundi, quando homo conditus est et reliqua, quae facta in medio sacra narrat historia, usque ad consummationem mundi. et quaerendum, quod uelum templi scissum sit, exterius an interius; mihique uidetur in passione domini illud uelum esse conscissum, quod et in tabernaculo et in templo foris positum fuit et appellabatur exterius, quia nunc ex parte uidemus et ex parte cognoscimus; cum autem uenerit, quod perfectum est, tunc etiam uelum interius disrumpendum, ut omnia, quae nunc nobis abscondita sunt, domus dei sacramenta uideamus: quid significent duo cherubin, quid oraculum, quid uas aureum, in quo manna reconditum fuit. nunc enim per speculum uidemus in imagine et, cum historiae nobis uelum scissum sit, ut ingrediamur atrium dei, tamen secreta eius et uniuersa mysteria, quae in caelesti Hierusalem clausa retinentur, scire non possumus. igitur in passione domini terra commota est iuxta illud, quod scriptum est in Aggeo: adhuc ego semel mouebo caelum et terram et ueniet desideratus cunctis gentibus, ut ab oriente et occidente ueniant et recumbant cum Abraham, Isaac et Iacob. et petrae scissae sunt: dura corda gentilium; siue petrae uniuersa uaticinia prophetarum, qui et ipsi a petra Christo cum apostolis petrae uocabulum susceperunt, ut, quicquid in eis duro legis uelamine. claudebatur, scissum pateret gentibus. monumenta quoque, de quibus scriptum est: uos estis sepulchra extrinsecus dealbata, quae intus plena sunt ossibus mortuorum, ideo sunt aperta, ut egrederentur de his, qui prius in fidelitate mortui erant, et cum resurgente Christo atque uiuente uiuerent et ingrederentur caelestem Hierusalem et haberent municipatum nequaquam in terra, sed in caelo, morientesque cum terreno Adam resurgerent cum Adam caelesti. porro secundum litteram nulli uiolentum esse uideatur mortuo saluatore appellari Hierusalem sanctam ciuitatem, cum usque ad destructionem eius semper apostoli templum ingressi sint et ob scandalum eorum, qui de Iudaeis crediderant, legis exercuerint caerimonias. in tantum autem amauit Hierusalem dominus, ut fleret eam et plangeret et pendens in cruce loqueretur: pater, ignosce eis; quod enim faciunt. nesciunt. itaque impetrauit, quod petierat, multaque statim de Iudaeis milia crediderunt et usque ad quadragesimum secundum annum datum est tempus paenitentiae, post quos perseuerantibus illis in blasphemia egressi sunt duo ursi de siluis gentium Romanorum, Uespasianus et Titus, et blasphemantes pueros ascendentique uero Heliseo in domum dei — hoc enim interpretatur Bethel — uoce consona inludentes interfecerunt atque lacerauerunt et ex eo tempore Hierusalem non appellatur ciuitas sancta, sed et sanctitatem et pristinum nomen amittens spiritaliter uocatur Sodoma et Aegyptus, ut aedificetur pro ea noua ciuitas, quam fluminis impetus laetificat et de cuius medio egreditur fons, qui totius orbis amaritudinem mitigauit, ut miserabilis Israhel ruinas templi nudatis plangat lacertis et in Christum turba credentium noua cotidie uideat ecclesiae tecta consurgere et dicat Sion: angustus mihi locus est impleaturque illud, quod in Esaia scriptum est: et erit sepulchrum eius inclitum.

What is meant by what is written in the evangelist Matthew: "And Jesus, crying out with a loud voice, gave up his spirit. And the veil of the temple was torn in two from top to bottom, and the earth was shaken, and the rocks were split, and the tombs were opened, and many bodies of the saints who had fallen asleep rose, and coming out of the tombs after his resurrection they went into the holy city and appeared to many"? — We have discussed this passage too in the same commentaries. First it must be said that it is a sign of divine power to lay down one's life when one wills and to take it up again. Thus the centurion, seeing that he had said to the Father, "Into your hands I commend my spirit," and at once of his own accord had given up his spirit, was moved by the greatness of the sign and said: "Truly this was the Son of God." The veil of the temple was torn in two, so that what Josephus reports might be fulfilled, that the powers who presided over the temple said: "Let us depart from these seats." But in the gospel written in Hebrew letters we read not that the veil of the temple was torn, but that the lintel of the temple, of wonderful size, collapsed. "The earth," he says, "was shaken" (unable to bear its Lord hanging) "and the rocks were split" (to show the hardness of the Jews, who refused to recognize the Son of God when he was present) "and the tombs were opened" (as a sign of the future resurrection) "and many bodies of the saints, coming out of their tombs, went into the holy city and appeared to many." By the holy city we must understand Jerusalem, as distinct from all the cities that then served idols; for in it alone were the temple, the worship of the one God, and true religion. And they did not appear to all, but to many, those who received the risen Lord. Then, according to the anagogical sense (ἀναγωγή), it must be said that, as Jesus cried out and gave up his spirit, the veil of the temple was torn in two from top to bottom and all the mysteries of the law were uncovered, so that what had formerly been kept hidden might be made known to all nations. "In two": into the old and the new instrument; "from top to bottom": from the beginning of the world, when man was created, with all that sacred history narrates as done in between, to the consummation of the world. And we must ask which veil of the temple was torn, the outer or the inner. It seems to me that in the Lord's passion that veil was torn which was placed outside, both in the tabernacle and in the temple, and was called the outer veil, because now we see in part and know in part; but when what is perfect has come, then the inner veil too is to be torn, so that we may see all the mysteries of the house of God that are now hidden from us: what the two cherubim mean, what the oracle, what the golden vessel in which the manna was stored. For now we see through a mirror, in an image; and though the veil of history has been torn for us, so that we may enter the court of God, yet we cannot know his secrets and all the mysteries that are kept shut up in the heavenly Jerusalem. So in the Lord's passion the earth was shaken, according to what is written in Haggai: "Once more I will shake heaven and earth, and the one desired by all nations will come," so that they may come from east and west and recline with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. "And the rocks were split": the hard hearts of the Gentiles; or the rocks are all the oracles of the prophets, who themselves, with the apostles, received the name of rock from Christ the rock, so that whatever was shut up in them by the hard veil of the law might be split open and lie open to the Gentiles. The tombs too, of which it is written, "You are sepulchres whitewashed on the outside, which inside are full of dead men's bones," were opened for this purpose, that there might come out of them those who had formerly been dead in unbelief, that they might live with Christ risen and living, enter the heavenly Jerusalem, have their citizenship not on earth but in heaven, and, dying with the earthly Adam, rise with the heavenly Adam. Further, according to the letter, let no one think it forced that Jerusalem is called the holy city after the Savior's death, since until its destruction the apostles always entered the temple and, so as not to give offense to those of the Jews who had believed, practiced the ceremonies of the law. The Lord loved Jerusalem so much that he wept and lamented over it and, hanging on the cross, said: "Father, forgive them; for they do not know what they are doing." So he obtained what he had asked, and many thousands of the Jews at once believed, and until the forty-second year a time for repentance was granted. After that, as they persisted in blasphemy, two bears came out of the forests of the Gentiles, the Romans Vespasian and Titus, and killed and tore to pieces the blaspheming boys who mocked with one voice the true Elisha as he went up into the house of God (for that is what Bethel means). From that time Jerusalem is not called the holy city, but, losing both its holiness and its former name, is spiritually called Sodom and Egypt, so that a new city may be built in its place, which the rushing river makes glad, and from whose midst there comes out a spring that has sweetened the bitterness of the whole world; so that wretched Israel may lament the ruins of the temple with bared arms, while the new crowd of believers in Christ sees the roofs of the church rising daily, and Zion says, "The place is too narrow for me," and what is written in Isaiah is fulfilled: "And his tomb shall be glorious."

Matt 27:50–53 (quotation, high confidence) · John 10:18 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 23:46 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 27:54 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 13:9–10 (quotation, high confidence) · Heb 9:3–5 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 13:12 (quotation, high confidence) · Hag 2:6–7 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 8:11 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 10:4 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 23:27 (quotation, high confidence) · Phil 3:20 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:47–49 (allusion, high confidence) · Acts 21:20 (allusion, medium confidence) · Luke 19:41 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 23:34 (quotation, high confidence) · Acts 2:41 (allusion, medium confidence) · 2 Kgs 2:23–24 (allusion, high confidence) · Rev 11:8 (allusion, high confidence) · Ps 46:4 (45:5 LXX) (allusion, high confidence) · Ezek 47:1–8 (allusion, medium confidence) · Isa 49:20 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 11:10 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Jerome explains the signs at Christ's death (the torn veil, earthquake, split rocks, opened tombs) literally and spiritually, and says Jerusalem lost the name of holy city after its destruction.

  • "The same commentaries" are Jerome's Commentary on Matthew. The saying of the temple's guardian powers is in Josephus, Jewish War 6.299. The lintel's collapse is from the gospel in Hebrew letters (the Gospel according to the Hebrews). The "forty-second year" counts from the crucifixion to the fall of Jerusalem in AD 70. The image of the two bears is from 2 Kgs 2:23-24. Jerome's judgments on the Jews and on Jerusalem are his own and are translated as written.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR split word; OCR split words; stray letter; stray letters): I e sus → Iesus; uoce ee magna → uoce magna; dua s p artes → duas partes; dormier ant, r esurr e xerunt → dormierant, resurrexerunt; uener unt → uenerunt; mquit → inquit; quod mclamante lesu → quod clamante Iesu; nesciunt n t. → nesciunt.; inclitum. i → inclitum..

Extrabiblical texts: Josephus, B.J. 6.299 (Josephus (works); allusion); Gos. Heb. (Gospel of the Hebrews; quotation)

Topics: Scripture and canon

Cite (SBL): Jerome, Ep. 120.8 (CSEL 55:489–492; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/jerome-epistulae/120-8/#p-120-8).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-jerome-epistulae-120-8) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from Hilberg's Latin text (CSEL 54–56, 1910–1918); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 6 translation (Fremantle, 1893) where it translates a letter in full, and otherwise re-read against the Latin.

120.9CSEL 55:492–500

Quomodo saluator secundum Iohannem insufflat spiritum sanctum apostolis et secundum Lucam post ascensionem missurum esse se dicit?– Huius quaestionis perfacilis solutio est, si docente apostolo Paulo spiritus sancti diuersas gratias nouerimus. scribit enim in prima ad Corinthios: diuisiones donorum sunt, idem uero spiritus; et diuisiones ministeriorum, idem autem dominus; et diuisiones operationum et idem deus, qui operatur omnia in omnibus. unicuique autem datur manifestatio spiritus ad id, quod expedit. alii quidem datur per spiritum sermo sapientiae, alii sermo scientiae secundum eundem spiritum, alii gratiae sanitatum in uno spiritu, alii fides in eodem spiritu, alii operatio uirtutum, alii prophetia, alii discretio spirituum, alii genera linguarum, alii interpretatio sermonum. omnia autem haec operatur unus atque idem spiritus diuidens unicuique, prout uult. ergo dominus, qui post resurrectionem suam iuxta Lucae euangelium dixerat: ecce ego mittam promissionem patris mei in uos; uos autem sedete in ciuitate, quoadusque induamini uirtutem ex alto, et iuxta eundem in apostolorum Actibus praecepit eis, ab Hierosolymis ne discederent, sed expectarent promissionem patris, quam audistis per os meum, quia Iohannes quidem baptizauit aqua, uos autem baptizabimini spiritu sancto non post multos hos dies, rursum in fine euangelii secundum Iohannem eo die, quo resurrexerat, id est die dominica, clausis ianuis ad apostolos introisse narratur et dixisse eis secundo: pax uobis et intulisse: sicut misit me pater, et ego mitto uos. hoc cum dixisset, insufflauit et dicit eis: accipite spiritum sanctum; quorum remiseritis peccata, remittuntur eis, quorum retinueritis, retenta erunt. primo igitur die resurrectionis eius acceperunt spiritus sancti gratiam, qua peccata dimitterent et baptizarent et filios dei facerent et spiritum adoptionis credentibus largirentur ipso saluatore dicente: quorum remiseritis peccata, remittentur eis et, quorum retinueritis, retenta erunt. die autem pentecostes eis amplius repromissum est, ut baptizarentur spiritu sancto et induerentur uirtutem, qua Christi euangelium cunctis gentibus praedicarent, iuxta illud, quod in sexagesimo septimo psalmo legimus: dominus dabit uerbum euangelizantibus uirtute multa, ut haberent operationem uirtutum et gratiam sanitatum et praedicaturi multis gentibus acciperent genera linguarum, ut iam tunc cognosceretur, qui apostolorum quibus deberent gentibus nuntiare. denique apostolus Paulus, qui de Hierusalem usque in Illyricum praedicauit et inde per Romam ad Hispanias ire festinat, gratias agit deo, quod cunctis apostolis magis linguis loquatur. qui enim multis gentibus adnuntiaturus erat, multarum linguarum acceperat gratiam. quae repromissio spiritus sancti die decimo post ascensionem saluatoris expleta est Luca referente, qui scribit: cumque conplerentur dies pentecostes, erant omnes pariter in eodem loco et factus est repente de caelo sonus tamquam aduenientis spiritus uehementis et repleuit totam domum, ubi erant sedentes. et apparuerunt illis dispertitae linguae tamquam ignis, seditque super singulos eorum et repleti sunt omnes spiritu sancto et coeperunt loqui aliis linguis, prout spiritus sanctus dabat eloqui illis. tunc conpletum est illud, quod legitur in Iohel: et erit in nouissimis diebus, dicit dominus, effundam de spiritu meo super omnem carnem et prophetabunt filii uestri et filiae uestrae et iuuenes uestri uisiones uidebunt. uerbum autem effusionis significat gratiae largitatem et id ipsum sonat, quod dominus repromisit: uos autem baptizabimini spiritu sancto non post multos hos dies. in tantum enim sancto spiritu baptizati sunt, ut repleretur tota domus, ubi erant sedentes, et ignis spiritus sancti stationem in eis inueniret optatam linguasque diuideret et secundum Esaiam, qui inmunda labia habere se dixerat, purgaret labia eorum, ut euangelium Christi purius praedicarent. et in Esaia quidem superliminare templi dicitur fuisse commotum et repleta omnis domus fumo, id est errore et tenebris uerique ignorantia. in principio autem euangelii repletur spiritu ecclesia, ut gratia eius atque feruore omnium credentium peccata purgentur et igne spiritus sancti, quem dominus missurum esse se dixerat, praedicatura Christum lingua sanetur. non ergo Iohannes Lucasque discordant, ut, quod ille prima resurrectionis die datum esse significat, hic die quinquagesimo uenisse describat, sed profectus apostolicus est, ut, qui primum remittendorum peccatorum gratiam acceperant, postea acciperent operationes uirtutum et cuncta donationum genera, quae ab apostolo descripta memorauimus, et — quod magis necessarium erat — diuersitatem linguarum uniuersarumque gentium, ut adnuntiaturi Christum nullo egerent interprete. unde et in Lycaonia, cum audissent Paulum et Barnaban loqui linguis suis, deos in homines conuersos esse credebant. et re uera indumentum uirtutis spiritus sancti gratia est, quam possidentes iudicum tribunalia et regum purpuras non timebant. promiserat enim dominus, priusquam pateretur, et dixerat: cum autem tradent uos, nolite cogitare, quomodo aut quid loquamini; dabitur enim uobis in illa hora, quid loquamini. non enim uos estis, qui loquimini, sed spiritus patris uestri, qui loquitur in uobis. ego audacter et tota libertate pronuntio ex eo tempore, quo apostoli domino crediderunt, semper eos habuisse spiritum sanctum nec potuisse signa facere absque spiritus sancti gratia, sed pro modulo atque mensura. unde saluator clamabat in templo dicens: qui sitit, ueniat ad me et bibat. qui credit in me, sicut dicit scriptura, flumina de uentre eius fluent aquae uiuae. hoc autem dixit de spiritu, quem accepturi erant credentes in eum. et in eodem loco infert: nondum enim erat spiritus datus, quia Iesus nondum fuerat glorificatus, non quo non esset spiritus sanctus dicente domino saluatore: si autem ego in spiritu sancto eicio daemonia, sed, qui erat in domino, necdum totus in apostolis morabatur. quam ob rem deterrentur ad passionem eius et negant et Christum nescire se iurant. postquam autem baptizantur in spiritu sancto et effunditur in eos spiritus sancti gratia, tunc libere loquuntur ad principes Iudaeorum: oboedire magis deo oportet an hominibus? mortuos suscitant, inter flagella laetantur, fundunt sanguinem et suis suppliciis coronantur. nondum ergo erat spiritus in apostolis nec de uentre eorum fluebant gratiae spiritales, quia dominus necdum fuerat glorificatus. quae sit autem gloria, ipse in euangelio loquitur: pater, glorifica me gloria, quam apud te habui prius, quam mundus esset. gloria saluatoris patibulum triumphantis est. crucifigitur ut homo, glorificatur ut deus. denique sol fugit, luna mutatur in sanguinem, terra motu insolito contremiscit, aperiuntur inferi, mortui ambulant, saxa rumpuntur. haec est gloria, de qua loquebatur in psalmo: exsurge, gloria mea, exsurge, psalterium et cithara. ipsaque de se respondit gloria et dispensatio carnis adsumptae: exsurgam diluculo, ut impleatur uicesimi primi psalmi titulus: pro adsumptione matutina. haec dicimus, non quod alium deum et alium hominem esse credamus et duas personas faciamus in uno filio dei, sicut noua heresis calumniatur, sed unus atque idem filius dei et filius hominis est et, quicquid loquitur, aliud referimus ad diuinam eius gloriam, aliud ad nostram salutem. pro quibus non rapinam arbitratus est esse se aequalem deo, sed se ipsum exinaniuit factus oboediens patri usque ad mortem et mortem crucis. et uerbum caro factum est et habitauit in nobis. miror autem Montanum et insanas feminas eius, abortiuos prophetas, domino promittente atque dicente: uado et alium paracletum mittam uobis et postea Luca euangelista narrante, quod apostoli acceperint, quod promissum est, id multo post tempore in se dicere fuisse conpletum. apostolis enim promissum est: ego mittam sponsionem patris mei in uos et uos sedebitis in ciuitate, quoad usque induamini uirtutem ex alto, et resurgens in apostolorum, insufflauit faciem — et non in Montani, Priscillae et Maximillae — et illis ait: quorum dimiseritis peccata, dimittentur et, quorum retinueritis, retenta erunt. apostolis, inquam, praecepit, ne recederent de Hierosolymis, sed expectarent promissionem spiritus. et postea, quod promissum est, expletum legimus: repleti sunt omnes spiritu sancto et coeperunt loqui aliis linguis, prout spiritus sanctus dabat eloqui eis. spiritus enim sanctus spirat, ubi uult, et, quando dicit dominus: alium paracletum mittam uobis, et se ostendit esse paracletum, qui appellatur consolator. unde et deus pater hoc censetur nomine: deus miserationum et totius consolationis. si autem pater consolator, et filius consolator et spiritus sanctus consolator; et in nomine patris et filii et spiritus sancti, quod intellegitur deus, baptizantur credentes. quorum unum diuinitatis et consolatoris est nomen, ergo et una natura est. hic spiritus sanctus non solum in apostolis, sed et in prophetis fuit, de quo Dauid orabat dicens: spiritum sanctum tuum ne auferas a me. et Danihel spiritum dei habuisse narratur et Dauid in spiritu loquitur dixisse dominum domino suo: sede a dextris meis, donec ponam inimicos tuos scabellum pedum tuorum. nec sine spiritu sancto prophetauerunt prophetae et uerbo domini caeli firmati sunt et spiritu oris eius omnis uirtus eorum; et, quicquid patris et filii est, hoc idem et spiritus sancti est et ipse spiritus, cum mittatur a patre et pro filio ueniat, in alio atque alio loco spiritus dei patris et Christi spiritus appellatur. unde et in Actibus apostolorum, qui Iohannis baptismate fuerant baptizati et credebant in deum patrem et Christum, quia spiritum sanctum nesciebant, iterum baptizantur, immo tunc uerum accipiunt baptisma — absque spiritu enim sancto inperfectum est mysterium trinitatis - et in eodem uolumine Petrus Ananiae et Sapphirae dixisse narratur, quod mentientes spiritui sancto non sint hominibus mentiti, sed deo.

How is it that, according to John, the Savior breathes the Holy Spirit on the apostles, and according to Luke says that he will send him after the ascension? — The solution of this question is very easy if, taught by the apostle Paul, we know the diverse graces of the Holy Spirit. For he writes in the first letter to the Corinthians: "There are varieties of gifts, but the same Spirit; and varieties of ministries, but the same Lord; and varieties of workings, and the same God, who works all in all. To each is given the manifestation of the Spirit for what is profitable. To one is given through the Spirit the word of wisdom, to another the word of knowledge according to the same Spirit, to another gifts of healing in the one Spirit, to another faith in the same Spirit, to another the working of powers, to another prophecy, to another discernment of spirits, to another kinds of tongues, to another the interpretation of speech. But all these are worked by one and the same Spirit, dividing to each as he wills." So the Lord, who after his resurrection had said according to Luke's gospel, "Behold, I will send the promise of my Father upon you; but stay in the city until you are clothed with power from on high," and according to the same writer in the Acts of the Apostles commanded them not to depart from Jerusalem but to wait for the promise of the Father, "which you have heard from my mouth; for John baptized with water, but you will be baptized with the Holy Spirit not many days from now," is again narrated at the end of the gospel according to John to have come in to the apostles through closed doors on the day on which he had risen, that is, the Lord's day, and to have said to them a second time, "Peace be with you," and to have added: "As the Father has sent me, so I send you." "And when he had said this, he breathed on them and said to them: Receive the Holy Spirit; whose sins you forgive, they are forgiven them; whose you retain, they are retained." On the first day of his resurrection, then, they received the grace of the Holy Spirit by which they might forgive sins, baptize, make children of God, and bestow the spirit of adoption on believers, as the Savior himself said: "Whose sins you forgive, they will be forgiven them, and whose you retain, they are retained." But on the day of Pentecost more was promised them: that they would be baptized with the Holy Spirit and clothed with power, by which they would preach the gospel of Christ to all nations, according to what we read in the sixty-seventh psalm: "The Lord will give the word to those who preach the good news with much power," so that they might have the working of powers and the gift of healings and, being about to preach to many nations, might receive kinds of tongues, so that it might already then be known which apostles were to preach to which nations. Thus the apostle Paul, who preached from Jerusalem to Illyricum and from there hastens to go by way of Rome to Spain, thanks God that he speaks in tongues more than all the apostles. For he who was to preach to many nations had received the gift of many tongues. This promise of the Holy Spirit was fulfilled on the tenth day after the Savior's ascension, as Luke reports, writing: "When the day of Pentecost was being fulfilled, they were all together in the same place, and suddenly there came from heaven a sound as of a violent wind coming, and it filled the whole house where they were sitting. And there appeared to them divided tongues as of fire, and it sat upon each of them, and they were all filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak in other tongues, as the Holy Spirit gave them to speak." Then was fulfilled what is read in Joel: "And it shall be in the last days, says the Lord, I will pour out of my Spirit upon all flesh, and your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, and your young men shall see visions." The word "pour out" signifies the lavishness of grace and expresses the very thing the Lord promised: "But you will be baptized with the Holy Spirit not many days from now." For they were baptized with the Holy Spirit to such a degree that the whole house where they were sitting was filled, and the fire of the Holy Spirit found in them the dwelling it desired and divided the tongues and, as with Isaiah, who had said that he had unclean lips, purified their lips, so that they might preach the gospel of Christ more purely. In Isaiah indeed the lintel of the temple is said to have been shaken and the whole house filled with smoke, that is, with error and darkness and ignorance of the truth. But at the beginning of the gospel the church is filled with the Spirit, so that by his grace and fervor the sins of all believers may be purged, and by the fire of the Holy Spirit, whom the Lord had said he would send, the tongue that was to preach Christ might be healed. John and Luke, therefore, do not disagree, as if what the one indicates was given on the first day of the resurrection the other describes as having come on the fiftieth day; it is rather the apostles' progress: those who had first received the grace of forgiving sins afterwards received the workings of powers and all the kinds of gifts which, as we have mentioned, the apostle describes, and, what was more necessary, the variety of the languages of all nations, so that, when they proclaimed Christ, they would need no interpreter. Hence in Lycaonia too, when they heard Paul and Barnabas speaking their own language, they believed that gods had turned into men. And truly the clothing of power is the grace of the Holy Spirit; possessing it they did not fear the tribunals of judges or the purple of kings. For the Lord had promised before he suffered, saying: "But when they hand you over, do not think how or what you are to speak; for what you are to speak will be given you in that hour. For it is not you who speak, but the Spirit of your Father who speaks in you." I declare boldly and with complete freedom that from the time when the apostles believed in the Lord they always had the Holy Spirit and could not have done signs without the grace of the Holy Spirit, but according to their measure and degree. Hence the Savior cried out in the temple, saying: "Let him who thirsts come to me and drink. He who believes in me, as the Scripture says, out of his belly shall flow rivers of living water." This he said of the Spirit, whom those who believed in him were to receive. And in the same place he adds: "For the Spirit had not yet been given, because Jesus had not yet been glorified." This is not because the Holy Spirit did not exist, since the Lord Savior says, "But if I cast out demons by the Holy Spirit," but because he who was in the Lord did not yet dwell wholly in the apostles. For that reason they are frightened away at his passion, deny him, and swear that they do not know Christ. But after they are baptized in the Holy Spirit and the grace of the Holy Spirit is poured out on them, then they speak freely to the rulers of the Jews: "Must one obey God rather than men?" They raise the dead, rejoice amid scourgings, shed their blood, and are crowned by their sufferings. So the Spirit was not yet in the apostles, nor did spiritual graces flow from their belly, because the Lord had not yet been glorified. What that glory is he himself says in the gospel: "Father, glorify me with the glory which I had with you before the world was." The Savior's glory is the gibbet of one who triumphs. He is crucified as man, glorified as God. So the sun flees, the moon is changed into blood, the earth trembles with an unusual earthquake, the underworld is opened, the dead walk, the rocks are rent. This is the glory of which he spoke in the psalm: "Awake, my glory; awake, psaltery and harp." And the glory itself, the economy of the flesh he assumed, answered for itself: "I will awake at dawn," so that the title of the twenty-first psalm might be fulfilled: "For the taking-up at morning." We say this not because we believe that the God is one and the man another and make two persons in the one Son of God, as a new heresy falsely charges; rather, one and the same is Son of God and Son of Man, and of whatever he says we refer some things to his divine glory and some to our salvation. For our sake he did not count it robbery to be equal with God, but emptied himself, becoming obedient to the Father unto death, even death on a cross; and the Word became flesh and dwelt among us. I am amazed, however, that Montanus and his mad women, those abortive prophets, say that what the Lord promised when he said, "I go, and I will send you another Paraclete," and what the evangelist Luke afterwards narrates the apostles received, was fulfilled in themselves long afterwards. For it was promised to the apostles: "I will send the promise of my Father upon you, and you will stay in the city until you are clothed with power from on high"; and when he rose he breathed on the face of the apostles, and not of Montanus, Priscilla, and Maximilla, and said to them: "Whose sins you forgive, they will be forgiven, and whose you retain, they are retained." It was the apostles, I say, whom he commanded not to leave Jerusalem but to wait for the promise of the Spirit. And afterwards we read that what was promised was fulfilled: "They were all filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak in other tongues, as the Holy Spirit gave them to speak." For the Holy Spirit breathes where he wills; and when the Lord says, "I will send you another Paraclete," he shows that he too is a Paraclete, which means "Comforter." Hence God the Father too is known by this name: "the God of mercies and of all comfort." But if the Father is Comforter, the Son is Comforter and the Holy Spirit is Comforter; and believers are baptized in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, which is understood as God. Since they have one name of divinity and of Comforter, they have also one nature. This Holy Spirit was not only in the apostles but also in the prophets; David prayed about him, saying: "Do not take your Holy Spirit from me." Daniel is said to have had the Spirit of God, and David, speaking in the Spirit, says that the Lord said to his Lord: "Sit at my right hand, until I make your enemies the footstool of your feet." Nor did the prophets prophesy without the Holy Spirit; by the word of the Lord the heavens were established, and all their power by the Spirit of his mouth. Whatever belongs to the Father and the Son belongs also to the Holy Spirit, and the Spirit himself, since he is sent by the Father and comes in place of the Son, is called in different places the Spirit of God the Father and the Spirit of Christ. Hence in the Acts of the Apostles those who had been baptized with John's baptism and believed in God the Father and in Christ, because they did not know the Holy Spirit, are baptized again, or rather then receive true baptism, for without the Holy Spirit the mystery of the Trinity is incomplete; and in the same book Peter is said to have told Ananias and Sapphira that in lying to the Holy Spirit they had lied not to men but to God.

1 Cor 12:4–11 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 24:49 (quotation, high confidence) · Acts 1:4–5 (quotation, high confidence) · John 20:19–23 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 8:15 (allusion, high confidence) · Ps 68:11 (67:12 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 15:19 (allusion, high confidence) · Rom 15:24 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 14:18 (allusion, high confidence) · Acts 2:1–4 (quotation, high confidence) · Joel 2:28 (3:1 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 6:4–7 (allusion, high confidence) · Acts 14:11 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 10:19–20 (quotation, high confidence) · John 7:37–39 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 12:28 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 26:69–74 (allusion, high confidence) · Acts 5:29 (quotation, high confidence) · Acts 5:41 (allusion, medium confidence) · John 17:5 (quotation, high confidence) · Joel 2:31 (3:4 LXX) (allusion, medium confidence) · Matt 27:51–52 (allusion, high confidence) · Ps 57:8 (56:9 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 22:1 (21:1 LXX) (allusion, medium confidence) · Phil 2:6–8 (quotation, high confidence) · John 1:14 (quotation, high confidence) · John 14:16 (quotation, high confidence) · John 16:7 (allusion, medium confidence) · John 3:8 (allusion, high confidence) · 2 Cor 1:3 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 28:19 (allusion, high confidence) · Ps 51:11 (50:13 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Dan 4:8 (allusion, medium confidence) · Matt 22:43–44 (allusion, high confidence) · Ps 110:1 (109:1 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 33:6 (32:6 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 8:9 (allusion, medium confidence) · Acts 19:1–6 (allusion, high confidence) · Acts 5:3–4 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Jerome reconciles John 20:22 and the promise of Pentecost: the apostles first received the grace to forgive sins, then at Pentecost the fuller gifts of power and tongues; he rejects the Montanist claim and argues for the Spirit's divinity.

  • Jerome numbers the psalms as in the Greek and Latin Bible: the "sixty-seventh" is Ps 68, and the "twenty-first" is Ps 22, whose title in the Greek and Latin reads "for the morning help" (here "taking-up"). The "new heresy" that charged others with making two persons in Christ is not named; it is probably the Apollinarians. Montanus and the prophetesses Priscilla and Maximilla claimed that the promise of the Paraclete was fulfilled in them; Jerome's polemic is translated as written. "Tenth day" is as printed; Pentecost fell ten days after the ascension.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR joined words; OCR slip; OCR slips; OCR split word; line-break hyphen; line-break hyphen and stray mark; stray digit; stray mark): spiritum 1 sanctum → spiritum sanctum; op-eratur → operatur; euangehum → euangelium; e t apparuerunt lllis → et apparuerunt illis; tra dent → tradent; etin eodem → et in eodem; nec- J dum → necdum; glona → gloria; mutatui → mutatur; e xsurgam → exsurgam; de u s miserationum → deus miserationum; nomen,. ergo → nomen, ergo.

Extrabiblical texts: Mont. Or. (Montanist oracles; allusion)

Topics: Trinity, Christology, Heresy, Baptism

Cite (SBL): Jerome, Ep. 120.9 (CSEL 55:492–500; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/jerome-epistulae/120-8/#p-120-9).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-jerome-epistulae-120-9) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from Hilberg's Latin text (CSEL 54–56, 1910–1918); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 6 translation (Fremantle, 1893) where it translates a letter in full, and otherwise re-read against the Latin.

120.10CSEL 55:500–506

Quid significet illud, quod apostolus Paulus disputat ad Romanos scribens: quid ergo dicimus? numquid iniquitas apud deum? absit usque ad eum locum, ubi ait: nisi dominus sabaoth reliquisset nobis semen, sicut Sodoma facti essemus et sicut Gomorra similes fuissemus. — Omnis quidem ad Romanos epistula interpretatione indiget et tantis obscuritatibus inuoluta est, ut in intellegenda ea spiritus sancti indigeamus auxilio, qui per apostolum haec ipsa dictauit; sed praecipue locus hic, in quo quidam uolentes dei seruare iustitiam ex praecedentibus causis dicunt electum in utero Rebeccae Iacob et abiectum Esau, sicut et Hieremias et Baptista Iohannes eliguntur in utero et ipse apostolus praedestinatur in euangelium, antequam nascatur. nobis autem nihil placet, nisi quod ecclesiasticum est et publice in ecclesia dicere non timemus, ne iuxta Pythagoram et Platonem et discipulos eorum, qui sub nomine Christiano introducunt dogma gentilium, dicamus animas lapsas esse de caelo et pro diuersitate meritorum in his uel illis corporibus poenas antiquorum luere peccatorum. multoque melius est simpliciter imperitiam confiteri et inter cetera, quae nescimus, etiam huius loci obscuritatem refugere quam, dum uolumus dei probare iustitiam, Basilidis et Manichei heresim defendere et Hiberas nenias Aegyptiaque portenta sectari. dicamus igitur, ut possumus, et apostolicae uoluntatis sequentes uestigia ne puncto quidem, ut dicitur, atque ungue transuerso ab illius sententiis recedamus. fleuerat supra et dolori suo et conscientiae testem inuocauerat spiritum sanctum, quod fratres sui et cognati secundum carnem, id est Israhelitae, dei filium non recepissent, quorum fuit adoptio et gloria et testamenta et legislatio et cultura et promissio, ex quibus etiam ipse Christus secundum carnem de Maria generatus est uirgine, et tam continuo cordis dolore torquetur, ut ipse optet anathema esse a Christo, id est solus perire, ne omne Israheliticum genus pereat. et quia hoc dixerat, statim uenientem e regione praeuidet quaestionem: quid ergo dicis? omnes, qui ex Israhel sunt, perierunt? et quomodo tu ipse et ceteri apostoli et infinita Iudaici populi multitudo Christum dei filium recepistis?, quam ita soluit: Israhel in scripturis sanctis dupliciter appellatur et in duos diuiditur filios: in unum, qui iuxta carnem est, et in alterum, qui iuxta repromissionem et spiritum. Abraham duos habuit filios, Ismahel et Isaac. Ismahel, qui secundum carnem natus est, hereditatem patris non accepit; Isaac, qui de repromissione generatus est ex Sarra, semen dei appellatur. scriptum est enim: in Isaac uocabitur tibi semen, id est: non, qui filii carnis, hi filii dei, sed, qui filii sunt repromissionis, isti aestimantur in semine. et hoc non solum in Ismahel et Isaac accidisse conuincimus, sed etiam in duobus Rebeccae filiis, Esau et Iacob, quorum alter abiectus, alter electus est. et hoc totum dicit, ut in prioribus fratribus, Ismahel et Esau, populum Iudaeorum abiectum esse significet, in posterioribus autem, hoc est in Isaac et Iacob, electum populum gentium uel eos, qui ex Iudaeis in Christum credituri erant. et quoniam hoc uolens adprobare proposuerat testimonium nascentium geminorum Esau et Iacob, de quibus scriptum est: maior seruiet minori et in Malachia legimus: Iacob dilexi, Esau autem odio habui, uenientem e latere quaestionem more suo proponit et disserit et hac soluta reuertitur ad id, de quo coeperat disputare. si Esau et Iacob necdum nati erant nec aliquid egerant boni aut mali, ut uel promererentur deum uel offenderent, et electio eorum atque abiectio non merita singulorum, sed uoluntatem eligentis et abicientis ostendit, quid ergo dicimus? iniquus est deus? secundum illud exemplum, quod loquitur ad Moysen: miserebor, cui misertus fuero, et misericordiam praestabo, cuius miserebor, si hoc, inquit, recipimus, ut faciat deus, quodcumque uoluerit, et absque merito et operibus uel eligat aliquem uel condemnet, ergo non est uolentis neque currentis, sed miserentis dei, maxime cum eadem scriptura, hoc est idem deus, loquatur ad Pharaonem: in hoc ipsum excitaui te, ut ostendam in te uirtutem meam et adnuntietur nomen meum in uniuersa terra. si hoc ita est et pro uoluntate sua miseretur Israheli et indurat Pharaonem, ergo frustra queritur atque causatur nos uel bona non fecisse uel fecisse mala, cum in potestate illius sit et uoluntate absque bonis et malis operibus uel eligere aliquem uel abicere, praesertim cum uoluntati illius humana fragilitas resistere nequeat. quam ualidam quaestionem scripturarum ratione contextam et paene insolubilem breui apostolus sermone dissoluit dicens: o homo! tu quis es, qui respondeas deo? et est sensus: ex eo, quod respondes deo et calumniam facis et de scripturis tanta perquiris, ut loquaris contra deum et iustitiam uoluntatis eius inquiras, ostendis te liberi arbitrii et facere, quod uis, uel tacere uel loqui. si enim in similitudinem uasis fictilis te a deo creatum putas et illius non posse resistere uoluntati, hoc considera, quia uas fictile non dicit figulo: quare me sic fecisti? — figulus enim habet potestatem de eodem luto et de eadem massa aliud uas facere in honorem, aliud uero in contumeliam -, deus autem aequali cunctos sorte generauit et dedit arbitrii libertatem, ut faciat unusquisque, quod uult, siue bonum siue malum. in tantum autem dedit omnibus potestatem, ut uox impia disputet contra creatorem suum et causas uoluntatis illius perscrutetur. sin autem uolens deus ostendere iram et notam facere potentiam suam, sustinuit in multa patientia uasa irae apta in interitum, ut ostenderet diuitias gloriae suae in uasa misericordiae, quae praeparauit in gloriam, quos et uocauit nos non solum ex Iudaeis, sed etiam ex gentibus, sicut in Osee dicit: uocaui non plebem meam plebem meam et non dilectam dilectam, et erit in loco, ubi dictum est ei: non plebs mea uos, ibi uocabuntur filii dei uiui et cetera, quae sequuntur. si, inquit, patientia dei indurauit Pharaonem et multo tempore poenas distulit Israhelis, ut iustius condemnaret, quos tanto tempore sustinuerat, non dei accusanda patientia est et infinita clementia, sed eorum duritia, qui bonitatem dei in perditionem suam abusi sunt. alioquin unus est solis calor et secundum essentias subiacentes alia liquefacit, alia indurat, alia soluit, alia constringit; liquatur enim cera et induratur lutum et tamen non est caloris diuersa natura. sic et bonitas dei atque clementia uasa irae, quae apta sunt in interitum, id est populum Israhel, indurat, uasa autem misericordiae, quae praeparauit in gloriam, quae et uocauit, hoc est nos, qui non solum ex Iudaeis sumus, sed etiam ex gentibus, non saluat inrationabiliter et absque iudicii ueritate, sed causis praecedentibus, quia alii non susceperunt filium dei, alii recipere sua sponte uoluerunt. haec autem uasa misericordiae non solum populus gentium est, sed et hi, qui ex Iudaeis credere uoluerunt, et unus credentium effectus est populus. ex quo ostenditur non gentes eligi, sed hominum uoluntates atque ita factum est, ut impleretur illud, quod dictum est per Osee: uocaui non plebem meam plebem meam, hoc est populum gentium, et, quibus prius dicebatur: non plebs mea, nunc uocentur filii dei uiui. quod ne solum de gentibus dicere uideretur, etiam eos, qui ex Israhelis multitudine crediderunt, uasa misericordiae et electionis appellat. clamat enim Esaias pro Israhel: si fuerit numerus filiorum Israhel tamquam harena maris, reliquiae saluae fient, hoc est: etiam si multitudo non crediderit, tamen pauci credent. uerbum enim consummatum atque breuiatum in sua deus aequitate librauit, ut humilitate et incarnatione Christi eos saluos faceret, qui in eum credere uoluissent. hoc ipsum et in alio loco dicit Esaias: nisi dominus sabaoth reliquisset nobis semen, sicut Sodoma facti essemus et sicut Gomorra similes fuissemus. cumque testimonia proposuisset, quibus duplex uocatio praedicitur et gentium et populi Iudaeorum, transit ad cohaerentem disputationem et idcirco dicit gentes, quae non sectabantur iustitiam, adprehendisse iustitiam, quia non superbierint, sed in Christum crediderint, Israhelis autem magnam partem ideo corruisse, quia offenderit in lapidem offensionis et petram scandali et ignorauerit iustitiam dei et quaerens statuere iustitiam suam iustitiae dei, qui Christus est, subici noluerit. legi in cuiusdam commentariis sic respondisse apostolum, ut magis inplicuerit, quam soluerit quaestionem. ait enim ad id, quod proposuerat: quid ergo dicimus? numquid iniquitas apud deum? et: non est uolentis neque currentis, sed miserentis dei et: cuius uult, miseretur et, quem uult, indurat et: uoluntati eius quis potest resistere? sic apostolum respondisse: o homo, qui terra et cinis es, audes deo facere quaestionem et, uas fragile atque testaceum, rebellas contra figulum tuum? numquid figmentum potest dicere ei, qui se finxit: quare me sic fecisti? aut non habet potestatem figulus luti ex eadem massa facere aliud quidem uas in honorem, aliud uero in contumeliam? aeterno igitur silentio conticesce et scito fragilitatem tuam et deo ne moueas quaestionem, qui fecit, quod uoluit, ut in alios clemens, in alios seuerus existeret:

What is meant by the apostle Paul's argument when he writes to the Romans: "What then shall we say? Is there injustice with God? Far from it," up to the place where he says: "Unless the Lord of Sabaoth had left us seed, we would have become like Sodom and been made like Gomorrah"? — The whole letter to the Romans indeed needs interpretation and is wrapped in such obscurities that to understand it we need the help of the Holy Spirit, who dictated these very things through the apostle; but especially this passage, in which some, wishing to safeguard the justice of God, say that it was for preceding causes that Jacob was chosen in Rebecca's womb and Esau rejected, just as Jeremiah and John the Baptist are chosen in the womb, and the apostle himself is predestined for the gospel before he is born. But nothing pleases us except what belongs to the church and what we are not afraid to say publicly in the church, lest, following Pythagoras and Plato and their disciples, who under the Christian name bring in the doctrine of the Gentiles, we should say that souls have fallen from heaven and, according to the difference of their merits, pay in these or those bodies the penalties of former sins. It is much better simply to confess ignorance and, among the other things we do not know, to shrink also from the obscurity of this passage, than, while wishing to prove God's justice, to defend the heresy of Basilides and Mani and follow Iberian trifles and Egyptian monstrosities. Let us speak, then, as we can, and, following the traces of the apostle's intention, let us not depart from his thoughts even by a point or, as they say, a nail's breadth. He had wept above and called the Holy Spirit to witness his grief and his conscience, because his brothers and kinsmen according to the flesh, that is, the Israelites, had not received the Son of God, they to whom belonged the adoption and the glory and the covenants and the giving of the law and the worship and the promise, from whom also Christ himself according to the flesh was born of the virgin Mary; and he is so tormented by unceasing grief of heart that he himself wishes to be accursed from Christ, that is, to perish alone, so that the whole Israelite race may not perish. And because he had said this, he at once foresees the question coming from the other side: "What then do you say? Have all who are from Israel perished? And how is it that you yourself and the other apostles and an endless multitude of the Jewish people have received Christ, the Son of God?" He resolves it thus: Israel is spoken of in two ways in the Holy Scriptures and is divided into two sons: one who is according to the flesh, and another who is according to the promise and the spirit. Abraham had two sons, Ishmael and Isaac. Ishmael, who was born according to the flesh, did not receive his father's inheritance; Isaac, who was born of Sarah by promise, is called the seed of God. For it is written: "In Isaac shall your seed be called," that is, it is not the children of the flesh who are children of God, but the children of the promise are reckoned as seed. And we show that this happened not only with Ishmael and Isaac but also with the two sons of Rebecca, Esau and Jacob, of whom one was rejected and the other chosen. He says all this to signify that in the elder brothers, Ishmael and Esau, the Jewish people was rejected, and in the younger ones, Isaac and Jacob, the people of the Gentiles was chosen, or those of the Jews who were to believe in Christ. And since, wishing to prove this, he had put forward the testimony of the twins Esau and Jacob at their birth, of whom it is written, "The elder shall serve the younger," and in Malachi we read, "Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated," he raises, in his usual way, a question coming from the side, discusses it, and, having solved it, returns to what he had begun to discuss. If Esau and Jacob were not yet born and had done nothing good or evil to win God's favor or to offend him, and their election and rejection show not the merits of each but the will of the one who chooses and rejects, "What then shall we say? Is God unjust?", according to the example he gives from God's word to Moses: "I will have mercy on whom I have had mercy, and I will show mercy to whom I will have mercy." "If," he says, "we accept this, that God does whatever he wills and, without merit and works, either chooses or condemns someone, then it is not of him who wills nor of him who runs, but of God who shows mercy," especially since the same Scripture, that is, the same God, says to Pharaoh: "For this very purpose I raised you up, to show my power in you and that my name may be proclaimed in all the earth." If this is so, and at his will he has mercy on Israel and hardens Pharaoh, then it is in vain that he complains and accuses us of not having done good or of having done evil, since it lies in his power and will to choose or reject someone without good or evil works, especially since human frailty cannot resist his will. This strong question, woven from the reasoning of the Scriptures and almost insoluble, the apostle solves in a brief word, saying: "O man, who are you to answer back to God?" And the sense is: by the very fact that you answer God and bring false charges and search out so much from the Scriptures in order to speak against God and inquire into the justice of his will, you show that you have free choice and do what you will, whether to be silent or to speak. For if you think that you were created by God like an earthen vessel and cannot resist his will, consider this: an earthen vessel does not say to the potter, "Why have you made me thus?" (for the potter has power to make from the same clay and the same lump one vessel for honor and another for dishonor); but God created all with an equal lot and gave them freedom of choice, so that each may do what he wills, whether good or evil. And he gave all such power that an impious voice argues against its creator and scrutinizes the reasons for his will. "But if God, wishing to show his wrath and make known his power, endured with much patience the vessels of wrath fitted for destruction, in order to show the riches of his glory on the vessels of mercy, which he prepared for glory, even us whom he also called, not only from the Jews but also from the Gentiles, as he says in Hosea: 'I will call those who were not my people my people, and her who was not beloved beloved; and in the place where it was said to them, You are not my people, there they shall be called sons of the living God,'" and the rest that follows. If, he says, the patience of God hardened Pharaoh and put off for a long time the punishment of Israel, so that he might more justly condemn those whom he had borne so long, it is not the patience and infinite clemency of God that is to be blamed, but the hardness of those who abused God's goodness to their own ruin. The heat of the sun is one, and according to the substances beneath it, it melts some things and hardens others, loosens some and binds others; wax is melted and clay is hardened, and yet the nature of the heat is not different. So too the goodness and clemency of God hardens the vessels of wrath that are fitted for destruction, that is, the people of Israel; but the vessels of mercy, which he prepared for glory and which he also called, that is, us, who are not only from the Jews but also from the Gentiles, he does not save irrationally and without true judgment, but for preceding causes, because some did not receive the Son of God, while others were willing of their own accord to receive him. These vessels of mercy are not only the people of the Gentiles but also those of the Jews who were willing to believe, and one people of believers has been made. From this it is shown that it is not nations that are chosen but the wills of human beings; and so it came about that what was said through Hosea was fulfilled: "I will call those who were not my people my people," that is, the people of the Gentiles, and those to whom it was formerly said, "Not my people," are now called sons of the living God. And lest he seem to speak only of the Gentiles, he also calls those of the multitude of Israel who believed vessels of mercy and of election. For Isaiah cries out on behalf of Israel: "Though the number of the sons of Israel be as the sand of the sea, a remnant will be saved"; that is, even if the multitude does not believe, yet a few will believe. For God, in his equity, weighed out a word completed and cut short, so that by the humility and incarnation of Christ he might save those who were willing to believe in him. Isaiah says the same thing in another place: "Unless the Lord of Sabaoth had left us seed, we would have become like Sodom and been made like Gomorrah." And having set out the testimonies by which the twofold calling, of the Gentiles and of the Jewish people, is foretold, he passes to the connected argument and says that the Gentiles, who did not pursue righteousness, attained righteousness because they were not proud but believed in Christ, while a great part of Israel fell because it stumbled on the stone of stumbling and the rock of offense, was ignorant of the righteousness of God, and, seeking to establish its own righteousness, would not submit to the righteousness of God, which is Christ. I have read in someone's commentaries that the apostle answered in such a way as to entangle the question rather than solve it. For to what he had proposed, "What then shall we say? Is there injustice with God?" and "It is not of him who wills nor of him who runs, but of God who shows mercy" and "He has mercy on whom he wills, and he hardens whom he wills" and "Who can resist his will?", the apostle, he says, answered thus: "O man, you who are earth and ashes, do you dare to question God, and do you, a fragile earthen vessel, rebel against your potter? Can the thing formed say to him who formed it, 'Why have you made me thus?' Or does the potter not have power over the clay to make from the same lump one vessel for honor and another for dishonor? Be silent, then, in eternal silence, know your frailty, and raise no question against God, who has done what he willed, so as to be merciful to some and severe to others."

Rom 9:14 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 9:29 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 9:10–13 (allusion, high confidence) · Jer 1:5 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 1:15 (allusion, high confidence) · Gal 1:15 (allusion, high confidence) · Rom 9:1–5 (allusion, high confidence) · Rom 9:6–8 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 21:12 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 25:23 (quotation, high confidence) · Mal 1:2–3 (quotation, high confidence) · Exod 33:19 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 9:15–16 (quotation, high confidence) · Exod 9:16 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 9:17–21 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 9:22–26 (quotation, high confidence) · Hos 2:23 (quotation, high confidence) · Hos 1:10 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 9:27–28 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 10:22–23 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 1:9 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 9:30–33 (allusion, high confidence) · Rom 10:3 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 1:30 (allusion, medium confidence) · Gen 18:27 (allusion, medium confidence) · Isa 29:16 (allusion, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Jerome interprets Rom 9:14-29, rejecting the idea of souls punished for sins before birth and arguing that God's choice rests on human free will to believe or refuse.

  • The view that Jacob and Esau were chosen or rejected "for preceding causes" (merits of souls before birth) is associated with Origen; Jerome rejects it as Pythagorean and Platonic. Basilides and Mani are named as holding related doctrines; "Iberian trifles" probably alludes to Priscillianism in Spain. The commentator in the last lines is unnamed. Jerome's reading of the "vessels of wrath" as the people of Israel is his own and is translated as written.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR joined words; OCR split word; OCR split words; stray line number; stray mark): qui d er g o → quid ergo; iniqui t a sap u d → iniquitas apud; a b sit → absit; sab a oth r eliqui s s et nobi s semen → sabaoth reliquisset nobis semen; qui 25 filii → qui filii; misertus. fuero → misertus fuero; tuquis → tu quis; me am plebem → meam plebem; uocab untur → uocabuntur; fienthocest:etiam → fient, hoc est: etiam.

Extrabiblical texts: Plato (Plato (works); allusion)

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Jerome, Ep. 120.10 (CSEL 55:500–506; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/jerome-epistulae/120-8/#p-120-10).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-jerome-epistulae-120-10) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from Hilberg's Latin text (CSEL 54–56, 1910–1918); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 6 translation (Fremantle, 1893) where it translates a letter in full, and otherwise re-read against the Latin.