Sermons 106–109
Latin text: Migne, PL 52 (Latin text: Migne, Patrologia Latina, digitized by Open Greek and Latin (patrologia_latina-dev, University of Leipzig), CC BY-SA 4.0).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0).
Chapter 106
106PL 52:495–497
De ficu quæ fructum non protulit. Sicut peritus magister ad audiendum rudes, ad intelligendum tardos,discipulorum sensus vario genere doctrinæ pulsat,suscitat,accendit ingenium, ita Dominus similitudinibus variis,diversis comparationibus, populorum pigros,tardosque animos ad evangelicum convocat et invitat auditum; namque hodie sic coepit: Arborem fici habebat quidam plantatam in vineasua,et venit quærens fructum in illa, et non invemt. Dixit autem ad cultorem vineæ: Eccetres anni sunt. ex quo venio quærens fructum in ficulnea hac, et non invenio: succideeam;ut quidet terram occupat?A ille respondens, ait illi, Domine, dimitte illam etiamhoc anno, usque dum fodiam circa illam, etmittam stercora, et siquidem fecerit fructum; sin autem, in futuro succides illam (Luc.XIII).A rborem fici kabebat quidam plantatam in vinea sua. Rogo quid tam planum, quid tam lucidum,quid tam commune,q uid rusticis sic vernaculum, quid proprium sicperitis quam propositæ similitudinis forma? Quae de generali usu veniens omnes et verbo instruit et convertit exemplo. Infructuosa arbor intricatcespitem, necat spatia, exhaurit terræ vires, cultorem coniicit damno, afficit taedio possidentem: ac sic excidere istam lucrum est, est istam commodum non habere. Sic homo utique qui naturæ donum,munus animæ, rationis beneficium, excellentiam sensus, judicium mentis, artis industria, culturæ bonum, per steriles atque inopes actus evertit, occupat, mergit, auctorifructum, cultori gratiam negat; sicut arbor o terra, sic iste e vita meretur excidi. Et sicut infecunda arbor si fuerit in vinea, dum fundit mortiferam subjectis viribus umbram, inimica non sibi soli, sed etiam palmitibus fit fecundis: ita homo deses, ignavus, si præsit populis, non sibi soli fit noxius, sed multis, dum sequentes se suo vitiatet perdit exemplo. Sed hanc similitudinem quare Dominus dixerit audiamus. Arbor ficus, brumali tempore transacto, dum grossos producit in florem, et simulat suum suis floribus fructum, decipitincaulos, illuditignaros.Namque mox projicit grossos,pigrum proficit et prorumpit in germen; et fit posterior cæteris fructu, quæ videbatur caeteras anteisse. Merito ergo a Domino Synagoga arborifici comparatur, quae calefacta tempore legali, temporaliter ecclesiastici fructusfloruitin figura. Patriarcharum namque radice solidata,sacerdotali exaltata culmine, propheticis dilatata ramis, Judaicæ observationis repleta grossis florebat, tunc spe sola fructum datura per Christum, immoipsum Christum datura post fructum, dicente Psalmista: Defructu ventristui ponam super sedem tuam (Ps. CXXXI). Unde sancti scientes hæc, spem fructus ex tlore capiebant, et solabantur praesentiadefuturis: videntesjam jamque succedere æterna mortalibus, perpetua caducis, Legi gratiam, Synagogfe Ecclesiam, coelestia terrenis,humanisdivina, omnibus Christum; quem quia venturum longa patientia sustinebant, venissefideli gaudio suntgavisi. Ex istis erat Simeon ille, cui promissum erat ut non videret mortem, donec videret Christum Domini, quem in ulnashabens,talem prorupit in vocem. Nunc dimittis servum tuum,Domine, secundum verbum tuum in pace. Quia viderunt oculi mei salutaretuum (Luc.11). Ignari vero dum fiduciam geruntin lege tota, neque sunt de Christi exspectatione sollicitl,neque suscipere Christum, neque agnoscere meruerunt: et ita sunt legalibus deceptiflosculis, sicut nescio! grossis suis decipit ficus. Hinc est quod Dominus adventus sui tempora scire cupientes mittit ad ficum, dicens: Videte ficulneam et omnes arbores. Cum producuntjam fructum, scitis quia prope est æstas; ita et vos cum videritis hæc fieri, scitote quia prope est regnum Dei (Luc. XXI), Videtis quia ficus non signat præsentia, sed indicat sic futura.Sedjam per ordinem propositum prosequamur exemplum. Arborem fici habebat quidam plantatam in vinea sua. Synagoga est arborficus,possessor arboris Christus, vinea in qua refertur plantata arbor ista, Israeliticusestpopulus,Isaiaprophetasic dicente: Vinea Domini Sabaoth domus Israel est (Isaiv). Venit, inquit, quærens fructum illa, et non invenit. Venit Christus, et in Synagogafructum fidei reperit nullum, quia totadolis erat inumbrata perfidiae. Ad ficulneam venit Christus, ad quam legitur Adam nudus fugisse postculpam,dicenteGeneseos libro:Et cognoverunt quia nudi sunt: et consuerunt folia fici, et fecerunt sibi succinctoria (Gen.III). Venit ergo ad ficum Christus, ut inveniret Adam, ut nudum tegeret pio suo corporis indumento, cujus ficus non velabat, sed stimulabat pudorem; cujus ficusista, id est Synagoga, circumcisionibus suis nudabatpartem verecundi corporis, non tegebat. Venit, inquit, quærens fructum, et non invenit. Dixit autem ad cultorem vinex: Ecce anni Ires sunt, exquo venio quœrens fructum in ficulnea hac, et non invenio; succide eam. Cultor vineæ, qui infructuosam ficum jubetur excidere, est praesul Synagogae angelus, qui sterilitatem, quia non potest excusare, inducias impetratsuppli cando. Sed illud prætereundum non est quod dixit: Ecce anni tres sunt. Tres anni, tria sunt tempora per quæ Christus ad Synagogam fructum uæsiturus advenit, idest, a per legem, per prophetas, per ipsam sui presentiamcorporalem, ut infructuosaficus,quæ jam divinitati fructus velut non necesariosdeneabatg, vel homini, vel esurienti,vel manducaturo Christo cibos necessarios non negaret.Sed nunc quid cultor vineæ responderit audiamus. Domme, dimitte illam et hoc anno. Cultor vineæ concedi adhuc evangelici temporis precatur annum; de quo Isaias dicit; Prædicar, annum Domini acceptum, et diem. retributionis (Isa. LXI). Ut quid? Usque dum fodiam circa illam. Vult eam apostolico vomere perfodere,quia legalis cultri non valuit sentire culturam. Et mittam stercora. Tantas radici necessaria, quæ protantapinguedine cespitis saneti fota coelesti imbre non meruit esse fecuuda.Ficus sterilis, Synogoga misera miseratioDe gentium stercoratur; ut vilissimis adjuta formentis redeat ad fructum, quae tanto et pretioso ubere decessit de fructu: quae si post hæc in eodem sterilitate permanserit, jam non cultoris falce,sed ipsius dominantis securi, desperata et inutiiissuccidetur.Et ideo nondixit: In futuro succidam eam, sed Succides eam, juxta illud Joannis: Jam securis ad radicem arborum posita est: Omnis ergo arbor non faciens fructum bonum, excidetur et in ignem mittetur (Matth. III). Quia poste vangelici cultum temporis infructuosas arbores securis judicii succidetetnovissimumsuscipiet et cremabit incendium.
[On the fig tree that bore no fruit.] As a skilled teacher stirs the minds of his pupils, who are untrained in listening and slow to understand, by various kinds of teaching, and rouses and kindles their wits, so the Lord by various likenesses and diverse comparisons calls and invites the lazy and slow minds of the peoples to hear the gospel; for today he began thus: “A certain man had a fig tree planted in his vineyard, and he came seeking fruit on it and found none. And he said to the vinedresser: See, for three years now I have come seeking fruit on this fig tree and have found none. Cut it down; why should it even use up the ground? But he answered him: Lord, let it alone this year also, until I dig around it and put on manure; and if it bears fruit, well; but if not, you will cut it down in future” (Luke 13:6–9). “A certain man had a fig tree planted in his vineyard.” I ask, what is so plain, so clear, so common, so homely to country people and yet so proper to the learned as the form of the comparison set before us? Drawn from general experience, it instructs all by its word and converts them by its example. A fruitless tree chokes the turf, wastes space, exhausts the strength of the soil, brings loss on the cultivator and wearies the owner; and so to cut it down is gain, and not to have it is profit. So a man who by sterile and empty actions overturns, takes up and sinks the gift of nature, the endowment of the soul, the benefit of reason, the excellence of sense, the judgment of the mind, the industry of skill and the good of cultivation, and denies fruit to his author and gratitude to his cultivator, deserves to be cut off from life as the tree from the earth. And as a barren tree in a vineyard, while it pours deadly shade on the plants beneath, becomes an enemy not only to itself but also to the fruitful vine-branches, so a sluggish, lazy man, if he presides over peoples, becomes harmful not to himself alone but to many, since he corrupts and ruins those who follow him by his example. But let us hear why the Lord spoke this comparison. The fig tree, when winter has passed, brings out its early unripe figs in blossom and feigns its fruit with its flowers, and so deceives the incautious and mocks the ignorant. For soon it casts off the unripe figs, advances slowly and breaks out into new shoots; and the tree that seemed to have gone ahead of the others becomes later than the others in fruit. Rightly, then, the Lord compares the synagogue to a fig tree, which, warmed by the season of the law, blossomed for a time in a figure of the church's fruit. For, made firm by the root of the patriarchs, raised high by the priestly summit, spread wide by the prophetic branches, filled with the unripe figs of Jewish observance, it was blossoming, then to give fruit through Christ in hope alone, or rather to give Christ himself after the fruit, as the Psalmist says: “Of the fruit of your womb I will set upon your throne” (Ps 132:11). Hence the saints, knowing this, took hope of fruit from the blossom and consoled the present with the future, seeing now, now eternal things succeeding mortal ones, perpetual things perishable ones, grace the law, the church the synagogue, heavenly things earthly ones, divine things human ones, Christ all; and since they awaited his coming with long patience, they rejoiced with faithful joy that he had come. Among these was that Simeon to whom it had been promised that he would not see death until he saw the Lord's Christ, and who, holding him in his arms, burst out with this cry: “Now, Lord, you let your servant depart in peace according to your word, for my eyes have seen your salvation” (Luke 2:29–30). But the ignorant, while they placed their whole confidence in the law, were neither eager in expectation of Christ nor found worthy to receive or recognize Christ; and they were deceived by the little flowers of the law just as the fig tree deceives the ignorant with its unripe figs. That is why the Lord sends those who wish to know the times of his coming to the fig tree, saying: “Look at the fig tree and all the trees; when they already put forth fruit, you know that summer is near; so you too, when you see these things happening, know that the kingdom of God is near” (Luke 21:29–31). You see that the fig tree does not signify present things but indicates future ones in this way. But now let us follow out the example set before us in order. “A certain man had a fig tree planted in his vineyard.” The fig tree is the synagogue; the owner of the tree is Christ; the vineyard in which this tree is said to be planted is the people of Israel, as the prophet Isaiah says: “The vineyard of the Lord of hosts is the house of Israel” (Isa 5:7). “He came,” it says, “seeking fruit on it and found none.” Christ came and found no fruit of faith in the synagogue, because it was wholly overshadowed by the deceits of faithlessness. Christ came to the fig tree to which Adam is read to have fled naked after his fault, as the book of Genesis says: “And they knew that they were naked, and they sewed fig leaves together and made themselves aprons” (Gen 3:7). So Christ came to the fig tree to find Adam, to cover the naked man with the loving garment of his body, Adam whose shame the fig tree did not veil but provoked, and whose shameful part of the body this fig tree, that is, the synagogue, laid bare by its circumcisions instead of covering it. “He came,” it says, “seeking fruit and found none. And he said to the vinedresser: See, for three years now I have come seeking fruit on this fig tree and have found none; cut it down.” The vinedresser who is ordered to cut down the fruitless fig tree is the angel who presides over the synagogue, who, since he cannot excuse its barrenness, obtains a delay by entreaty. But we must not pass over his saying, “See, for three years.” The three years are three times in which Christ came to seek fruit from the synagogue: through the law, through the prophets, through his own bodily presence; so that the fruitless fig tree, which was already denying fruits to the Godhead as though they were not needed, might not deny necessary food to the man, the hungry man, Christ who was about to eat. But now let us hear what the vinedresser answered. “Lord, let it alone this year also.” The vinedresser prays that the year of the gospel time be still granted, of which Isaiah says: “To proclaim the acceptable year of the Lord and the day of retribution” (Isa 61:2). For what purpose? “Until I dig around it.” He wants to dig it through with the apostolic ploughshare, because it could not feel the cultivation of the pruning knife of the law. “And put on manure.” So much is needed at the root of a tree which, warmed by such richness of holy soil and by the rain from heaven, did not deserve to be fruitful. The barren fig tree, the wretched synagogue, is manured by the mercy shown to the Gentiles, so that, helped by the most worthless fertilizers, it may return to fruit, it which fell away from fruit amid such great and precious richness; and if after this it remains in the same barrenness, it will be cut down as hopeless and useless, no longer by the cultivator's pruning hook but by the axe of the master himself. And so he did not say, “In future I will cut it down,” but, “You will cut it down,” according to John's word: “Already the axe is laid at the root of the trees; every tree, therefore, that does not bear good fruit will be cut down and thrown into the fire” (Matt 3:10). For after the cultivation of the gospel time the axe of judgment will cut down the fruitless trees, and the last fire will take them and burn them.
Luke 13:6–9 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 132:11 (131:11 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 2:25–30 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 21:29–31 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 5:7 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 3:7 (quotation, high confidence) · Mark 11:12–14 (allusion, medium confidence) · Isa 61:2 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 11:11 (allusion, low confidence) · Matt 3:10 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Chrysologus applies the parable of the barren fig tree to the unfruitful man and to the synagogue, which received Christ's visits through the law, the prophets and his presence, and is given one more year, the time of the gospel, before judgment.
- The identification of the fig tree with the synagogue and the remarks on circumcision are translated as written. “Christ who was about to eat” alludes to the cursing of the fig tree (Mark 11:12–14). The manure is read as the mercy shown to the Gentiles, which is to move Israel to fruit (cf. Rom 11:11).
Topics: Eschatology
Cite (SBL): Peter Chrysologus, Serm. 106 (PL 52:495–497; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/peter-chrysologus-sermones/106). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/peter-chrysologus-sermones/106
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-peter-chrysologus-sermones-106) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 52 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). No public-domain English exists; sermons in FOTC 17, 109 and 110 (Ganss; Palardy) were checked against them privately after translation, the others re-read against the Latin.
Chapter 107
107PL 52:497–499
In D. Petrum epscopum Ravennœ. Licet fandi sterilitas silentium mihi indicare videtur,loqui tamen vehementia cogit et sanctitas imperantis. Praestantius est in imperitum prodere eloquium, quam officiosum negare sermonem.Qui ergo tanti viri adhortationem recuset, cui e coelo contigit et apostolici vocabulum,et summi privilegium sacerdotis? Neque enim absque divino judicio fuisse credendum estquod prima illa vivendi rudisinfantia tanti nominis adepta est dignitatem? Quem tunc affuisse, ni si Deum ipsum putamus, cum nescii parentes de futuris meritis Judicarent? Petrum enim vocari in aliis appellatio nominis est,in hoc praerogativa virtutis. tere beatus Petrus, immobile fundamentum salutis, talem se exhibet in sacerdotio, quales videri volunt qui sacerdotium concupiscunt. Quemadmodum igitur sanctitatis regulamg diciplinismonasterialibus imbutus exercet? Pallent ora jej uniis,macies corpus attenuat, eleemosyna pro Delictis supplicat, lacrymæ peccata baptizant. Sed ne forte hoc devoti populi turba miraretur, solet Petrus flere, cum in eum Christus intendit (Matth. XXVI).Nec quisquam in apostolo imbrem irrigui luctus accuset.Jucundae sunt lacrymæ, quæ gaudium immortalitatis emerunt Marc. XVI). Ipse est ergo i custos fidei, petra Ecclesiae, janitorque cælorum. Ipse est apostolicus piscator electus, qui ad se turbas errorum fluctibus mersas,hamo sanctitatis invitat, et doctrinæ suae rete concluditad fidem hominum multitudine copiosam (Luc. v). Est etiam ipse beatissimus et apostolicus auceps, qui animas juvenum peraera volantes calamo divini sermonis attingit. Jure igitur venerabilis Dei sacerdos olim apostoli I nactus vocabulum, nunc adeptus et meritum, serit in populos præcepta justitiæ, et manifesta luce reserat sacrorum voluminum mysticas quaestiones: tantumqueestin cœlestibus magisterium disciplinis,ut qui convertitur,ipsi absolutionemdebeat; qui non corrigitur, sibi reatum. Omnis undique ad eum ex diversis regionum partibus visendi studio turba concurrit. Quicumque invias solitudines aut latentes eremi latebras incolebant, mirabilem Petrum magis veniunt videre ID quam saeculum. Datum est illis aliquando discere, difficilius quidem, sed gloriosius mundo praesente luctari: et adversus instructas delinquentes turbas aciem quamdam disponere sanctitatis. Quanta enim in mundo positispostcertamen palmaest,si in sollitudineconstitutis sine luctamine coronae debentur? Unde fratres,quoniam beatissimus Petrus omnia quæ, sunt divinæ virtutis, predicatione suae doctrinae vos instruit. pariter etexemplisedocet, deprecemur Dominum Deum nostrum, utaevo longissimo doctrinae coelestis vos sermone laetificet.
[On blessed Peter, bishop of Ravenna.] Although the barrenness of my speech seems to impose silence on me, yet the urgency and the holiness of the one who commands compel me to speak. It is better to put forth unskilled eloquence than to refuse a sermon that duty requires. Who, then, would refuse the exhortation of so great a man, on whom there has fallen from heaven both the name of the apostle and the privilege of the highest priesthood? For it must not be believed to have been without divine judgment that in the first untutored infancy of his life he obtained the dignity of so great a name. Who do we think was present then, if not God himself, when his parents, unaware of it, were judging of his future merits? For in others to be called Peter is the bearing of a name; in him it is the privilege of virtue. Truly blessed Peter, the immovable foundation of salvation, shows himself in the priesthood such as those who covet the priesthood wish to appear. How, then, does he, steeped in monastic disciplines, practise the rule of holiness? His face is pale with fasting, leanness wastes his body, almsgiving pleads for offences, tears baptize sins. But lest the crowd of devout people should perhaps wonder at this: Peter is accustomed to weep when Christ looks on him (Matt 26:75). Let no one find fault with the shower of watering grief in an apostle. Pleasant are the tears which have bought the joy of immortality. He, then, is the guardian of faith, the rock of the church and the doorkeeper of heaven. He is the chosen apostolic fisherman, who draws to himself with the hook of holiness the crowds sunk in the waves of errors, and encloses for faith in the net of his teaching a great multitude of people (Luke 5). He is also the most blessed and apostolic fowler, who reaches with the reed of the divine word the souls of the young flying through the air. Rightly, then, God's venerable priest, who once obtained the name of the apostle and has now gained his merit as well, sows the precepts of righteousness among the peoples and with clear light unlocks the mystical questions of the sacred books; and so great is his mastery in the heavenly disciplines that whoever is converted owes his absolution to him, and whoever is not corrected owes his guilt to himself. From every side, from various parts of the regions, a whole crowd runs together to him, eager to see him. Those who were living in trackless solitudes or the hidden retreats of the desert come to see the wonderful Peter rather than the world. It has been given them at last to learn, more difficult indeed but more glorious, to struggle with the world present, and to draw up a battle line of holiness against the arrayed crowds of offenders. For how great a palm awaits after the combat those who are placed in the world, if crowns are owed to those placed in solitude without a struggle? Therefore, brothers, since most blessed Peter instructs you by the preaching of his teaching and equally teaches you by his example in all things that belong to divine virtue, let us pray the Lord our God that he may gladden you for a very long age with the discourse of heavenly teaching.
Matt 16:18–19 (allusion, medium confidence) · Matt 26:75 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 22:61–62 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 5:4–10 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: A short sermon in praise of Bishop Peter of Ravenna, whose name, asceticism and teaching are compared to those of the apostle Peter.
- The sermon praises Bishop Peter of Ravenna in the third person and was evidently preached by another speaker at his command; it is generally regarded as not by Chrysologus. Translated as printed.
Topics: Church office, Fasting
Cite (SBL): Peter Chrysologus, Serm. 107 (PL 52:497–499; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/peter-chrysologus-sermones/107). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/peter-chrysologus-sermones/107
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-peter-chrysologus-sermones-107) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 52 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). No public-domain English exists; sermons in FOTC 17, 109 and 110 (Ganss; Palardy) were checked against them privately after translation, the others re-read against the Latin.
Chapter 108
108PL 52:499–501
De homine, ut sit hostia et sacerdos Deo. In verba Apostoli: Obsecro vos per misericordiam Dei, etc. Mira pietas, quae ut precetur,ut largiatur,exorat. Hodie namque beatus Apostolus non humana petens, sed divina conferens, sic precatur: Obsecro vos,per misericordiam Dei (Rom.XII), Medicus austera remedia cum recipere persuadet aegrotos, agit precibus, non compellitimperio,sciens infirmitatis,non voluntatis esse, quod salutaria respuit,quoties profutura repellit infirmus. Et filium pater non potestate,sed amore ad rigorem pertrahit disciplinae,non ignorans quam sit aspera immaturis sensibus disciplina. Et si corporalis infirmitas ad curam precibus sic movetur, et si sic puerilis animus vix ad prudentiam ducitur blandimentis, quid mirum si Apostolus, qui semper:; est et medicus et pater, humanas mentes morbis carnalibus sauciatas, ut ad remedia divina subrigat. sic precatur: Obsecro vos, per misericordiam Dei. Novum genus obsecrationis inducit. Quare non per virtutem? quare non per maj estatem,non per gloriam Dei,sed per misericordiam Dei? Quia peripsam solam Paulus et crimen persecutoris evasit, etapostolatus tanti adeptus est dignitatem: sicut ipse fatetur, die cens: Qui prius fui blasphemus et persecutor: et injuriosus,sed misericordiam Dei consecutus sum: Etiterum: Fidelis sermo et omni acceptione dignus: quia Christus in hunc mundum venit peccatores salvos facere quorum primus ego sum,sed misericordiam sum consecutus, ad exemplum omnium, qui credituri sunt illi in vitam æternam (I Tim. 1). Obsecro, inquit, vos per misericordiam Dei.Rogat Paulus, immo per Paulum rogat Deus,quia plus amari vult quam timeri. Rogat Deus quia non tam Dominus esse vult quam pater. Rogat Deus per misericordiam,ne vindicet per rigorem. Audi rogantem Dominum: Tota die,inquit, expandi manus meas (Isai. LXV). Nonne qui expandit manus ipso habitu rogat? Expandi manus meas. Ad quem? ad populum. Et ad quem populum? Non tantum non credentem, sed contradicentem. Expandi manus meas, Distendit membra, dilatat viscera, pectus porrigit, offert sinum, gremium pandit. ut patrem se tantæ obsecrationis demonstret affectu. Audi et aliter rogantem Deum: Popule meus, quid feci tibi,aut quid contristavi te (Mich. vi)? Nonne dicit: Si divinitas ignota est, vel caro sit nota? Videte, videte in me corpus vestrum,membra vestra,vestra viscera,ossa vestra, vestrum sanguinem. Et si quod Dei esttimetis,quare vel quod vestrum est non amatis? Si Dominum fugitis,quare non recurritis ad paren tem? Sed forte vos Passionis meae, quam fecistis, magnitudo confundit. Nolite timere. Crux haec non meus, sed mortis est aculeus.Claviisti non mihi infiguntdolorem, sed vestram mihi infigunt altius charitatem. Vulnera haec non educunt gemitus meos, sed magis vos meis visceribus introducunt. Exiensio corporis mei vos dilatat in gremium, non meam crescit in poenam.Sanguis meus non mihi deperit,sed vestrum prorogatur in pretium. Venite ergo,redite et vel sic probate patrem, quem videtis pro malis bona, pro inj uriis amorem,pro vulneribus tantis tantam reddere charitatem. Sedjam quid obsecret Apostolus audiamus: Obsecro, inquit, eos, ut exhibentis corpora vestra. Apostolus rogando sic omnes homines* ad sacerdotale fastigium provexit. Ut exhibeatis corpora vestrahostiam vivam. Oina uditum Christiani pontificatus officium,quando homo sibi ipse est et hostia et sacerdos; quando homo non extrinsecus quod Deo est immolaturus inquirit; quando homo secum, et in se,et quod prose est,Deo sacrificaturus apportai: quando et eadem manet hostia, idem permanet et sacerdos; quando hostiamactatur et vivit,sacerdos nescit occidere qui litabit. Mirum sacrificium, ubi corpus sine corpore,sine sanguine sanguis offertur, Obsecro, inquit, vos per misericordiam Dei, ut exhibeatis corpora vestra hostiam vivam. Fratres, hoc sacrificium Christi descendit ex forma, qui corpus suum pro vita saeculi vitaliter immolavit: et vere corpus suum fecithostiam vivam, quia vivit occisus. In tali ergo victima mors expenditur, hostia permanet, vivit hostia, mors punitur. Hinc martyres morte na- Icuntur, fine inchoant, occisione vivunt, et in caelis lucent, qui in terris putabatur exstincti. Obsecro, inquit, vos fratres per misericordiam Dei,ut exibeatis corpora vestra hostiam vivam sanctam. Hoc est illud quod propheta cecinit: Sacrificium et oblationem noluisti, corpus autem perfecisti mihi (Psal. XXXIX). Esto, homo, esto Dei sacrificium et sacerdos; non amittasquodtibidivinadeditetconcessitauctoritas; induere sanctitatis stolam, praecingere balteum castitatis; sit in velamento capitis tui Christus; crux in frontis tui munimine perseveret; pectori tuo appone divinæ scientiaesacramentum; in odorem thymiama semper orationis accende; arripe gladium Spiritus; altare cor tuum pone; et sic corpus tuum admove Dei securus ad victimam. Deus fidem, non mortem quaerit; votum,non sanguinem sitit; placatur voluntate, non nece. Hoc probat Deus, ad hostiam Abrahæ sancti filium cum poposcit (Gen. XXII). Nam quid aliud Abraham quam corpus suum immolabat in filio? Quid aliud Deus quam fidem requirebat in patre, qui filium sicut offerri jussit, sic non permisit occidi? Tali ergo homo confirmatus exemplo, offer corpus tuum et non solum macta, sed etiam seca per omnia virtutum membra. Quia toties libi vitiorum artes moriuntur, quoties a te Deo viscera fuerintimmolata virtutum.Offer fidem,utperfidia sit punita; immola joj uniu,ut voracitas cesset; sacrifica casti latem,ut moriaturlibido;impone pietatem,utdeponatur impietas: invita misericordiam. ut avaritia deleatur,et ut consumaturstultitia,sempersanctitatem convenitimmolare: sic fiet corpus tuum tua hostia, si nullo peccati jaculo fueritsauciata. Vivit corpus tuum,homo, vivitquoties a te Deo virtutum vita vitiorum mortibus immolatur. Non potest mori qui vitali gladius meretur occidi. Ipse autem Deus noster, qui est via, veritas et vita,et a morte nos liberet et perducat ad vitam.
[On man, that he may be a victim and a priest to God; on the words of the Apostle: “I beseech you by the mercy of God,” etc.] Wonderful love, which begs in order to give! For today the blessed Apostle, seeking not human things but conferring divine ones, prays thus: “I beseech you by the mercy of God” (Rom 12:1). When a physician persuades the sick to take harsh remedies, he acts by entreaties, not by the compulsion of command, knowing that it comes from infirmity, not from will, that the sick man rejects what is healthful whenever he refuses what will benefit him. And a father draws his son to the rigour of discipline not by power but by love, knowing how harsh discipline is to immature minds. And if bodily infirmity is moved to accept treatment by entreaties in this way, and if a boy's mind is scarcely led to prudence by coaxing, what wonder if the Apostle, who is always both physician and father, prays thus to lift human minds wounded by fleshly diseases to divine remedies: “I beseech you by the mercy of God.” He introduces a new kind of entreaty. Why not by the power, why not by the majesty, not by the glory of God, but by the mercy of God? Because through it alone Paul both escaped the crime of a persecutor and obtained the dignity of so great an apostleship, as he himself confesses, saying: “I who was formerly a blasphemer, a persecutor and insolent, but I obtained the mercy of God” (1 Tim 1:13). And again: “The saying is faithful and worthy of all acceptance, that Christ came into this world to save sinners, of whom I am the first; but I obtained mercy, as an example for all who would believe in him for eternal life” (1 Tim 1:15–16). “I beseech you,” he says, “by the mercy of God.” Paul begs; rather, God begs through Paul, because he wishes to be loved more than feared. God begs, because he wishes not so much to be Lord as Father. God begs by mercy so as not to punish by rigour. Hear the Lord begging: “All day long,” he says, “I have stretched out my hands” (Isa 65:2). Does not one who stretches out his hands beg by that very posture? “I have stretched out my hands.” To whom? To a people. And to what people? One that not only did not believe but contradicted. “I have stretched out my hands.” He stretches his limbs, opens wide his heart, holds out his breast, offers his bosom, spreads his lap, so as to show himself a father by the feeling of so great an entreaty. Hear God begging in another way too: “My people, what have I done to you, or how have I grieved you?” (Mic 6:3). Does he not say: If the Godhead is unknown, at least let the flesh be known? See, see in me your body, your limbs, your heart, your bones, your blood. And if you fear what is God's, why do you not at least love what is yours? If you flee from the Lord, why do you not run back to your parent? But perhaps the greatness of my passion, which you inflicted, confounds you. Do not fear. This cross is not my sting but the sting of death. These nails do not fix pain in me but fix your love more deeply in me. These wounds do not draw out my groans but rather draw you into my heart. The stretching out of my body opens a lap for you; it does not increase my punishment. My blood is not lost to me but is paid out as your price. Come, then, return, and so at least prove me your father, whom you see returning good for evil, love for injuries, such great charity for such great wounds. But now let us hear what the Apostle beseeches: “I beseech you,” he says, “to present your bodies.” By begging thus the Apostle has raised all people to the summit of the priesthood. “To present your bodies as a living victim.” O unheard-of office of the Christian priesthood, when a man is himself both victim and priest for himself; when a man does not seek outside himself what he is to sacrifice to God; when a man brings with himself and in himself and for himself what he will sacrifice to God; when the same victim remains and the same priest abides; when the victim is slain and lives, and the priest who will offer does not know how to kill. A wonderful sacrifice, where a body is offered without a body and blood without blood! “I beseech you,” he says, “by the mercy of God, to present your bodies as a living victim.” Brothers, this sacrifice comes down from the pattern of Christ, who sacrificed his body for the life of the world in a living way; and truly he made his body a living victim, because, though slain, he lives. In such a victim, then, death is paid out, the victim remains, the victim lives, and death is punished. Hence martyrs are born by death, begin by their end, live by being killed, and shine in heaven who were thought extinguished on earth. “I beseech you, brothers,” he says, “by the mercy of God, to present your bodies as a living, holy victim.” This is what the prophet sang: “Sacrifice and offering you did not desire, but a body you have prepared for me” (Ps 40:6). Be, O man, be both God's sacrifice and his priest; do not lose what divine authority has given and granted you; put on the robe of holiness, gird on the belt of chastity; let Christ be the covering of your head; let the cross remain as the defence of your forehead; place on your breast the sacrament of divine knowledge; always kindle the incense of prayer as a sweet odour; take up the sword of the Spirit; set up your heart as an altar; and so, without fear, bring your body to God as a victim. God seeks faith, not death; he thirsts for a vow, not for blood; he is appeased by the will, not by slaughter. God proved this when he asked for holy Abraham's son as a victim (Gen 22). For what else did Abraham sacrifice in his son but his own body? What else did God seek in the father but faith, he who, as he commanded the son to be offered, so did not allow him to be killed? Strengthened by such an example, then, O man, offer your body, and not only slay it but also cut it up into all the members of the virtues. For as often do the arts of the vices die in you as you sacrifice the inward parts of the virtues to God. Offer faith, so that faithlessness may be punished; sacrifice fasting, so that gluttony may cease; sacrifice chastity, so that lust may die; lay on piety, so that impiety may be laid aside; bring in mercy, so that avarice may be destroyed; and so that folly may be consumed, it is fitting always to sacrifice holiness. So your body will become your victim, if it has been wounded by no dart of sin. Your body lives, O man, it lives as often as the life of the virtues is sacrificed by you to God through the deaths of the vices. He cannot die who is worthy to be slain by a life-giving sword. May our God himself, who is the way, the truth and the life, free us from death and lead us to life.
Rom 12:1 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Tim 1:13 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Tim 1:15–16 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 65:2 (quotation, high confidence) · Mic 6:3 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:55–56 (allusion, medium confidence) · John 6:51 (allusion, medium confidence) · Ps 40:6 (39:7 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Exod 28:4–39 (allusion, medium confidence) · Eph 6:17 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 22:1–12 (allusion, high confidence) · John 14:6 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Expounding Rom 12:1, Chrysologus explains why Paul appeals “by the mercy of God,” imagines Christ pleading from the cross, and describes the Christian as both priest and living victim who offers the virtues to God.
- The vesture of the Christian priest (robe, belt, head-covering, breastplate, incense) draws on the high priest's vestments in Exod 28 and on Eph 6:17. Mic 6:3 is developed into a speech of Christ from the cross.
Topics: Ethics, Martyrdom, Fasting
Cite (SBL): Peter Chrysologus, Serm. 108 (PL 52:499–501; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/peter-chrysologus-sermones/108). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/peter-chrysologus-sermones/108
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-peter-chrysologus-sermones-108) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 52 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). No public-domain English exists; sermons in FOTC 17, 109 and 110 (Ganss; Palardy) were checked against them privately after translation, the others re-read against the Latin.
Chapter 109
109PL 52:501–505
De hostia corporis et animæ Deo rationabiliter olferenda. In eadem verba Apostoli. Quoniam praecedens sermo tantum primordia a tangit apostolicæ lectionis, nunc de his quae sequuntur quod Dominus inspirat audiamus; sic enim coepit: Obsecro, inquit, vos, per misericordiam Dei, ut exhibeatis corpora vestra hostiam vivam (Rom. XII). Numquid Apostolus sic dicendo, solo corpora digna divinis hostiis probat, et animas velut reprobas aut tacet, aut praeterit, aut relinquit? Nonne anima de caelo est, corpus e terra; hoc regitur,regit illa; illa dominatur,hoc servit; hoc vivit, vivificat illa;illa manet, hoc deficit; hoc aetates patitur, illa nescit; et ad extremum mors, quæ tantum dominatur in corpus, nec anima praesente contingit? Et quid est quod tacetur anima, et solum corpus ad Dei hostiam sic vocatur?Fratres,hic Apostolus honorat corpus, non minoratanimam.Namcorpusquodcapiuntpeccata, quod delicta vinciunt, quod deprimunt crimina, quod vitia corrumpunt, quod dejiciunt passiones, hoc Apostolus cupit solvere, liberare studet, laboratattollere, expiare contendit, ut corpus ad originem animæ conscendat,non anima descendat corporis ad naturam; et corpus animam comitetur ad coelum, non anima corpus sequatur ad terram. Audi Scripturam dicentēm anima qualibus et quantis corporis cruciatibus aggravetur: Corpus, quod corrumpitur, aggravat animam,etdeprimit terrena cogitatio sensum multa cogitantem (Sap.n). Ergo non deponi animam,sed corpus Apostolus vult levari; et animam et corpus, id est, hominem totum, ad hostiam sanctam,ad placitum Deo sacrificium vult venire.Quod autem et anima sit Dei sacrificium, Psalmista declarat dicens: Sacrificium Deo spiritus contribulatus (Psal. L). Ut exhibeatis corpora vestra hostiam vivam, sanctam, placentem Deo. Quia non homo ex eo quod vivit placet, sed placet ex eo quod bene vivit; nec ex eo ht homo hostia si se Deo offerat, sed si sancte offerat Deo. Quantum enim immaculata victima placat Deum, tantum Deum victima, si maculata fuerit, exacerbat. Audi dicentem Deum:Non offeras mihiclaudum,non luscum,non mortis cogitatione pollutum,sed matu- rum sine macula (Levit. XXII). Hinc est quod Apostolus vivam Deo petit hostiam.Ergo, fratres, si nos ipsius propitiationis incensum. Probat hoc Cain,qui cum Deo parva a quo totum perceperat ingratus pontifex sic divisit,ut quod erat pessimum, hoc adoleret altari; quod erat optimum, in suam reservaret offensam; denique cum sua suo male partitur cum auctore, se suosque posteros et a vita et ab humano genere perdivisit (Gen. IV). Ergo Abel sequamurad praemium,non Cain comitemurad pœnam. Abel agnum portans ad Dei sacrificium, sicut agnus assumitur; Cain gestans sibi stipulam, fomentum sibi, per quod exureretur, in venit. Ut exhibeatis corpora vestra hostiam vivam, sanctam, placentem Deo, rationabile obsequium vestrum. Quantum placatobse- quium quod ratione subnixum est, tantum quod rationem non habet, exacerbat.Rationabile obsequium. quod non praesumptione turbatur, non temeritate confunditur, non violatur illicitis, non simulatione fucatur.Ad obsequium regis militaris statiocontremiscit; humana dominatio exigit sollicitam servitutem,ad arbitriumjubentistimorobedientisinvigilat; qui et cauta devotio præmium justæ remunerationis acquirit,et temeritatis pcenam præsumptrix servitus Non evadit. Quis non vocatus ad aulae regalis se proripit servitutem? qui sine titulo militem se ausus est profiteri? quis sine dignitatis infulis nomen dignitatis invadit Et si hæc penes homines sollicita cautaque sunt,si satione constant, si convalescunt ordine, si tremore servantur; quanto, penes Deum magis cauta est devotio, magis tremenda servitus, magis sollicitus cultus, ut divinum ratione praestet obsequium? Rationabile, inquit, obsequium vestrum Obsequiumrationecalens,fervorest; furorest,quod ratione non frenatur. Hinc Judaicus populus Deum dum sibi praeter rationem quaerit, Deum qui cum ratione serviebat, amisit (Exod. xxxu). Hinc filii Aaron dum rationis sunt immemores,dum praesumunt terrenos ignes divinis ignibus admovere, flammam sacrificii salutaris in poenale sibi incendium commutarunt (Levit. x). Hinc Saul tumens regali vertice, dum putat sibi etdesacerdotio quid licere, regnum quod acceperat,altaris temerator amisit (I Reg. XV). Hinc Judaeus dum legem sine legis ratione excolit, legis interemit auctorem.Hic gentilis dum ddeorum populis et deorum monstris,e nescius rationis,obse- quitur,ad Dei, qui unus et verus est, pervenire non meruit servitutem.Hinc AriusPatrise putat obsequi Filium blasphemando;et dum Filio datinitium,Patri finem miserandus imponit. Hinc Photinus dum coaeternum Patri Filium negat, Pater ut Pater non semper fuerit elaborat. Hinc omnes hæreses dum feruntur ad divinitatis injuriam, dum Trinitatem mentiuntur vocabulis, a blasphemiis obsequuntur. Nos autem, fratres, et oorpora nostra aptemus in vivam Dei hostiam, obsequium nostrum rationabile procuremus, ut sit fides vera, pura conscientia, mens sobria, spes firma,cor m*undum,caro casta, sanctus sensus,pius animus,tula ratio,casta charitas, larga misericordia, vita sancta, verecundus habitus, et ad omne Christi obsequium humilitas nostrum semper comitetur incessum. SERMO ex. De salute sub fide reposita, justificatione a Deo per Christum; et de morte pro Christo subeunda. In verba. ejusdem: Non est autem scriptum propter Abraham tantum, etc. Beatus Apostolus primis etnovissimis, id est, Ju- dæis et Græcis, fidei vexillum unicum semper et singulare erigit ad salutem: quod quisquis habere non meruerit et tenere, cœlestium possidere non poterit gloriam triumphorum. Solum est, fratres, quod contra perfidam dimicantibus aciem dirigit, regem indicat, connectit socios,impiumque hostem sola sui visione terrificat.Sic enim hodie coepit: Non est autem scriptum prop*ter Abraham tantum, quod reputatum est illiad justitiam; sed et propter nos credentes tn eum qui sustitavit Jesum Dominum nostrum a mortuis (Rom.IV). Videtis, fratres, quia dum prioresfutura, dum praeterita credunt posteri,sic uno itinere fidei utrique perveniunt adsalutem, dum illi venturum Christum, nos jam venisseprofitemur,illi usque ad mortem morehominis descensurum miranturet credunt, nos essemortuum etresurrexisse gloriamur.Etquid plura, fratres? Ideo salus haec tam antecedentium, quamsequentium oculis est negata, ut tota esset in fide. Quod autem dixit: Qui suscitavit Jesum Dominum nostrum a mortuis. Ne quis ab alio credat, ipse sui factor et resuscitator est corporis, qui dixit: Potestatem habeo ponendi animam meam, et potestatem habeo iterum sumendi eam (Joan. x): neque enim ab alio resurrectio suscitari, neque ab alio vivificari vita potuit,nec eadem negare sibi quod erat omnibus collatura.Quia nec fons sitit, nec panis esurit, nec sol indiget luce, nec requies ipsa lassescit, Qui traditus est, inquit, propter delicta nostra, etresurrexitpropterjustificationem nostram. Traditus propter delicta,non ut ea quae non poterat mori vita pumretur, sed ut delicta, quae nos a vita exsulave- rant, sola delerentur.Et resurrexit propter justificationem nostram. Manente condemnatione justificari non potest condemnatus; nos ergo quos primi culpa sic parentis addixerat, ut mors obnoxios sibi jure retineret, Christus coelestis et verus parens, soluta mortiscondemnatione, per mortem propriamresurrectionem justificat, ut non reus pereat, sed reatus; ipsaque poena, id est mors, quae reos fuerat jussa percellere,merito deficiat at suae amittatinfulas potestatis. Curinnocentem, cur ipsum judicem crudelis et impia est ausa contingere? et ideo addidit: Justificati igitur ex fide pacem habeamus ad Deum (Rom. v). Hoc est dicere,desinat,desinat mater dissensionum, hostis quietis, pacis inimica contentio, non extollatur Judaeus per legem,gentilis non superbiat per naturam, philosophus ab opinionibus suis spumosis et inanibus detumescat,nemo de meritis, nemo de operibus glorietur; quia vitam, quam prævaricatio prima sustulerat,et elongaverat a nobis furiosacontentio, restiluit et reddidit pax divina. Pacem habeamus ad Deum, per Dominum nostrum Jesum Christum. Terra non rebellet in coelos, caro non insurgat in spiritum; sed supernae pacis humilis perpetem un- gaturadgloriam.Perquemaccessum habemus.Quare nobis ipse factus est via, fide in graliatn istam. Dax vitae istius fides est, fratres. In qua stamus et gloriamur in spe gloriæ filiorum Dei. Stamus certe fide non corpore; et in spe,non in re jam percepta gloriamur.Non solum autem, sed et gloriamur in tribulationibus, scientes quod tribulatio patientiam operatur, patientia autem probalionem,probatio autem spem, spes vero non confundit.Ecce quibusaetatibus justus perfectum roboratur in virum: in tribulatione, patientia, probatione, spe. Tribulatio, fratres, velut primajusti viri concutit et conturbat infantiam: sed cum invenerit istapatientem, admajoraadolescentemjam bonæ indolis tunc erudit. Tribulatio patrentiamoperatur. Patientia est, frutres, quæ Christi ju- venem aptum probat esse virtutibus, Spes vero non confundit. Spes est quæ virum perficit: et ad mensuram Christi plenitudinis indefessa producit. Perfectae virtutis est, quod in re non teneas spei robore possidere.Quia charitas Dei diffusa est in cordibus nostris per Spiritum sanctum, qui datus est nobis.Et ut diffusae in nos divinae charitatis ostenderet qualitatem, adjecit: Ut quid enim Christus, cum adhuc infirmi essemus secundum tempus pro impiis mortuus est? Vix enim pro justo quis morit ur: nam pro bono forsitan quis audeat mori Commendat autem charitatem suam Deus in nobis, quia adhuc cum peccatores essemus, Christus pro nobis mortuus est. Si Christus genus hominum sic dilexit, ut daret pro itu - piis et peccatoribus mortem suam, justis quidaliud. credimus largiturum, quam vitam suam, regnum suum,gloriam suam.Ex te suscepit mortem, quam impiis impenderet super terram, reservat tibi,quod in se et per se semper possidet, et possidet in coelo. Dicamus ergo cum propheta: Quid retribuam Domino pro omnibus quæ retribuit mihi? Calicem salutaris accipiam (Psal. cxv). Hoc est, et ego moriar pro illo. Et quid simile? ille sponte pro impio et peccatore, ego vix pro justo et bono: ego vix, quia me ad mortem non tam voluntas quam necessitas ducit.Audi ipsum dicentem ad Petrum. Cum autem senueris, pracinget te alius, et ducet quo tu non vii. In adversis, fratres, necessitas voluntati non potest comparari; acquiescere necessitas est, velle virtutis. Volenti mors ipsa subjecta est, quia semper do. minata est mors nolenti. Et tamen, fratres, quia divinæ charitalis nil simile potest homo redhibere, det quod potest, quia secundum quod habet acceptus est. Deficiat ad gloriam, moriatur ad vitam, pereat ad salutem. Gloriemur, fratres, de nova istius commutatione commercii; quia a mors, quas erat inter homines reparatio tota pietatis, per Christum divinæ commendatio est facta charitatis. b
[On the sacrifice of body and soul to be offered to God reasonably; on the same words of the Apostle.] Since the previous sermon touched only on the beginning of the apostolic reading, let us now hear what the Lord inspires about what follows; for he began thus: “I beseech you,” he says, “by the mercy of God, to present your bodies as a living victim” (Rom 12:1). Does the Apostle, by saying this, approve only bodies as worthy of divine sacrifices, and pass over souls in silence, or omit them or leave them aside as rejected? Is not the soul from heaven and the body from earth? This is ruled, that rules; that is master, this serves; this lives, that gives life; that remains, this fails; this passes through the ages of life, that does not know them; and finally death, which rules so greatly over the body, does not touch it while the soul is present. Why, then, is the soul passed over in silence and the body alone called to be God's victim? Brothers, here the Apostle honours the body; he does not lessen the soul. For the body, which sins seize, offences bind, crimes press down, vices corrupt and passions cast down, the Apostle wishes to release, strives to free, labours to lift up, contends to cleanse, so that the body may climb up to the origin of the soul, and the soul not descend to the nature of the body; so that the body may accompany the soul to heaven, and the soul not follow the body to earth. Hear Scripture telling with what great torments of the body the soul is weighed down: “The body that is corrupted weighs down the soul, and earthly thought presses down the mind that thinks many things” (Wis 9:15). So the Apostle does not want the soul set down but the body raised up; he wants both soul and body, that is, the whole man, to come to be a holy victim, a sacrifice pleasing to God. That the soul too is God's sacrifice the Psalmist declares, saying: “A sacrifice to God is a contrite spirit” (Ps 51:17). “To present your bodies as a living victim, holy, pleasing to God.” For a man pleases not because he lives but because he lives well; and a man becomes a victim not if he offers himself to God, but if he offers himself to God in holiness. For as much as an unblemished victim appeases God, so much does a blemished victim provoke God. Hear God saying: “Do not offer me one that is lame, or one-eyed, or polluted by the thought of death, but full-grown and without blemish” (Lev 22:22). That is why the Apostle asks for a living victim for God. So, brothers, if we … the incense of propitiation itself … Cain proves this, who, as an ungrateful priest, so divided a little with God, from whom he had received everything, that he burned on the altar what was worst and kept for himself what was best, to his own offence; and so, while he wrongly divides his goods with his author, he cut himself and his descendants off from life and from the human race (Gen 4). So let us follow Abel to the reward, not accompany Cain to punishment. Abel, carrying a lamb for God's sacrifice, is himself taken up like a lamb; Cain, carrying stubble for himself, found fuel by which he would be burned. “To present your bodies as a living victim, holy, pleasing to God, your reasonable service.” As much as service supported by reason appeases, so much does service without reason provoke. Reasonable service is that which is not disturbed by presumption, not confused by rashness, not violated by unlawful things, not painted over by pretence. A military post trembles in the service of a king; human lordship demands anxious servitude; the fear of the one who obeys keeps watch on the will of the one who commands; careful devotion gains the reward of just recompense, and presumptuous service does not escape the penalty of rashness. Who rushes uncalled into service at the royal court? Who without a title has dared to profess himself a soldier? Who without the insignia of rank seizes the name of rank? And if these things are anxious and careful among men, if they stand by reason, grow strong by order and are kept by trembling, how much more careful must devotion be with God, more fearful the servitude, more anxious the worship, so that it may render divine service with reason? “Your reasonable service,” he says. Service warm with reason is fervour; what is not bridled by reason is fury. Hence the Jewish people, while they sought for themselves a god contrary to reason, lost God, who was served with reason (Exod 32). Hence the sons of Aaron, while they forgot reason and presumed to bring earthly fire to the divine fires, changed the flame of the saving sacrifice into a penal burning for themselves (Lev 10). Hence Saul, swelling with royal height, while he thought that something of the priesthood was permitted him, lost the kingdom he had received, as a violator of the altar (1 Sam 15). Hence the Jew, while he cultivates the law without the reason of the law, has killed the author of the law. Hence the Gentile, while, ignorant of reason, he obeys the crowds of gods and the monsters of gods, has not deserved to come to the service of God, who is one and true. Hence Arius thinks he serves the Father by blaspheming the Son; and while he gives the Son a beginning, the wretch imposes an end on the Father. Hence Photinus, while he denies that the Son is co-eternal with the Father, labours to show that the Father was not always Father. Hence all heresies, while they are carried along to insult the Godhead and falsify the Trinity in their words, serve with blasphemies. But we, brothers, let us fit our bodies to be a living victim for God, let us take care that our service is reasonable, so that there may be true faith, a pure conscience, a sober mind, firm hope, a clean heart, chaste flesh, holy perception, a devout spirit, safe reason, chaste charity, generous mercy, a holy life, modest bearing, and that humility may always accompany our steps in every service of Christ. [Sermon 110. On salvation laid up in faith, on justification from God through Christ, and on undergoing death for Christ. On the words of the same: “But it was not written for Abraham's sake only,” etc.] The blessed Apostle always raises for salvation, for the first and for the last, that is, for Jews and Greeks, the one and only standard of faith: whoever does not deserve to have and to hold it will not be able to possess the glory of the heavenly triumphs. It alone, brothers, directs the battle line of those fighting against faithlessness, points out the king, joins the allies and terrifies the impious enemy by the mere sight of it. For today he began thus: “But it was not written for Abraham's sake only that it was reckoned to him as righteousness, but also for ours, who believe in him who raised Jesus our Lord from the dead” (Rom 4:23–24). You see, brothers, that while those before believe future things and those after believe past things, both reach salvation by the one road of faith: they confessed that Christ would come, we that he has come; they marvelled and believed that he would go down to death in the manner of a man, we glory that he has died and risen. And what more, brothers? This salvation was denied to the eyes both of those who went before and of those who came after, so that it might be wholly in faith. As for his saying, “who raised Jesus our Lord from the dead,” let no one believe that he was raised by another: he himself is the maker and the raiser of his own body, who said: “I have power to lay down my life, and I have power to take it again” (John 10:18); for the resurrection could not be raised by another, nor life be made alive by another, nor could he deny himself what he was to confer on all. For the spring does not thirst, nor the bread hunger, nor the sun lack light, nor rest itself grow weary. “Who was handed over,” he says, “for our offences, and rose for our justification” (Rom 4:25). Handed over for offences, not so that life, which could not die, might be punished, but so that the offences alone, which had exiled us from life, might be destroyed. “And rose for our justification.” While the condemnation remains, the condemned cannot be justified; so Christ, the heavenly and true parent, having dissolved the condemnation of death through his own death, justifies through his resurrection us, whom the guilt of the first parent had so bound over that death held us liable to itself by right; so that not the guilty man but the guilt perishes, and the penalty itself, that is, death, which had been ordered to strike down the guilty, rightly fails and loses the insignia of its power. Why did it dare, cruel and impious, to touch the innocent, the judge himself? And so he added: “Therefore, being justified by faith, let us have peace with God” (Rom 5:1). That is to say: let it cease, let it cease, contention, the mother of dissensions, the enemy of quiet, the foe of peace; let not the Jew be exalted by the law, let not the Gentile be proud by nature, let the philosopher subside from his foamy and empty opinions; let no one boast of merits, no one of works; because the life which the first transgression had taken away, and furious contention had removed far from us, divine peace has restored and given back. “Let us have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ.” Let earth not rebel against heaven, let flesh not rise against spirit; but let it, in humility, be joined to the perpetual glory of the peace on high. “Through whom we have access”: because he himself has become our way, “by faith into this grace.” Faith, brothers, is the leader of this life. “In which we stand, and we glory in the hope of the glory of the sons of God.” We stand, certainly, by faith, not by the body; and we glory in hope, not in a reality already received. “And not only so, but we glory also in tribulations, knowing that tribulation produces patience, and patience proof, and proof hope; and hope does not put to shame” (Rom 5:2–5). See through what ages the righteous man is strengthened into the perfect man: in tribulation, patience, proof, hope. Tribulation, brothers, shakes and disturbs, as it were, the infancy of the righteous man; but when it has found him patient, it then trains him, now a youth of good character, for greater things. “Tribulation produces patience.” It is patience, brothers, which proves Christ's young man fit for the virtues. “And hope does not put to shame.” It is hope that perfects the man and brings him, unwearied, to the measure of the fullness of Christ. It belongs to perfect virtue to possess by the strength of hope what you do not hold in reality. “Because the charity of God has been poured out in our hearts through the Holy Spirit who has been given to us.” And to show the quality of the divine charity poured into us, he added: “For why did Christ, while we were still weak, at the appointed time die for the ungodly? For one will scarcely die for a righteous man; for a good man perhaps someone might dare to die. But God commends his charity toward us, because while we were still sinners, Christ died for us” (Rom 5:6–8). If Christ so loved the human race as to give his death for the ungodly and for sinners, what else do we believe that he will bestow on the righteous but his life, his kingdom, his glory? From you he took the death which he would spend for the ungodly on earth; he keeps for you what he possesses always in himself and through himself, and possesses in heaven. So let us say with the prophet: “What shall I render to the Lord for all that he has rendered to me? I will take the cup of salvation” (Ps 116:12–13). That is: I too will die for him. And what likeness is there? He died freely for the ungodly and the sinner; I scarcely for the righteous and the good; scarcely, because not so much will as necessity leads me to death. Hear him saying to Peter: “But when you are old, another will gird you and lead you where you do not wish” (John 21:18). In adversity, brothers, necessity cannot be compared with will; to acquiesce is necessity, to will is virtue. Death itself is subject to the one who wills, as death has always ruled over the unwilling. And yet, brothers, since man can give back nothing like the divine charity, let him give what he can, because he is accepted according to what he has. Let him fail unto glory, die unto life, perish unto salvation. Let us glory, brothers, in the new terms of this exchange: because death, which among men was the whole repayment of love, has through Christ become the commendation of divine charity.
Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.
Rom 12:1 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 51:17 (50:19 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Lev 22:22 (quotation, medium confidence) · Gen 4:3–12 (allusion, high confidence) · Exod 32:1–6 (allusion, high confidence) · Lev 10:1–2 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Sam 15:22–28 (allusion, high confidence) · Rom 4:23–25 (quotation, high confidence) · John 10:18 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 5:1–8 (quotation, high confidence) · Eph 4:13 (allusion, medium confidence) · Ps 116:12–13 (115:3-Ps LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · John 21:18 (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Cor 8:12 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: On Rom 12:1 Chrysologus explains that body and soul together are to be offered as a reasonable sacrifice, contrasting unreasoning worship from Cain to Arius and Photinus; the passage also contains Sermon 110, on justification by faith and Christ's death for the ungodly (Rom 4:23–5:8).
- This passage holds two sermons: the digital text prints Sermon 110 (“SERMO CX”) inside Sermon 109, and it is translated here under the printed heading. In Sermon 109 a few words are lost after “So, brothers, if we …”; Migne's note that something is missing is removed by a logged correction, and the gap is marked. Photinus of Sirmium (d. 376) taught that the Son did not exist before his birth from Mary. “He is accepted according to what he has” echoes 2 Cor 8:12.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's editorial note ("some words are missing") leaked into the digital text): Desunt nonnulla. → .
Extrabiblical texts: Wis 9:15 (Wisdom of Solomon [in RC, EO, ETH canons]; quotation)
Topics: Heresy, Trinity, Martyrdom
Cite (SBL): Peter Chrysologus, Serm. 109 (PL 52:501–505; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/peter-chrysologus-sermones/109). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/peter-chrysologus-sermones/109
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-peter-chrysologus-sermones-109) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 52 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). No public-domain English exists; sermons in FOTC 17, 109 and 110 (Ganss; Palardy) were checked against them privately after translation, the others re-read against the Latin.