On True Religion 45–54

Latin text: Migne, PL 34 (Latin text: Migne, Patrologia Latina, digitized by Open Greek and Latin (patrologia_latina-dev, University of Leipzig), CC BY-SA 4.0).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0).

Show

Chapter 45

45PL 34:159

Quapropter, etiam in ista corporis voluptate invenimus unde commoneamur eam contemnere; non quia malum est natura corporis, sed quia in extremi boni dilectione turpiter volutatur, cui primis inhæ­ rere fruique concessum est. Cum trahitur auriga, et suæ temeritatis dat paenas, quidquid illud est quo utebatur, accusat: sed imploret auxilium, jubeat Do­ minus rerum, obsistatur equis, alia jam spectacula de illius praecipitatione facientibus, et nisi subveniatur de morte facturis, restituatur in locum, super rotas collocetur, habenarum jura reddantur, regat cautius obtemperantes, et edomitas bestias; tunc sentiet quam bene currus, et tota illa junctio fabricata sit, quæ ruina ejus, et ipsum affligebat, et cursum decentis­ simae moderationis amiserat: quia et huic corpori imbecillitatem peperit animae male utentis aviditas in paradiso, usurpans vetitum cibum contra medici disciplinam, qua sempiterna continetur salus. Si ergo in ista ipsa visibilis carnis imbecilli­ tate, ubi beata vita esse non potest, invenitur admo­ nitio beatae vitæ propter speciem de summo usque ad ima venientem; quanto magis in appetitione nobili­ tatis et excellentiæ, et in omni superbia vanaque pompa hujus mundi! Quid enim aliud in ea homo appetit, nisi solus esse, si fieri possit, cui cuncta subje­ cta sint, perversa scilicet imitatione omnipotentis Dei! Quem si subditus imitaretur, secundum praece­ pta ejus vivendo, per eum haberet subdita caetera, nec ad tantam deformitatem veniret, ut bestiolam time­ ret, qui vult hominibus imperare. Habet ergo et su­ perbia quemdam appetitum unitatis et omnipotentiæ; sed in rerum temporalium principatu, quae omnia transeunt tanquam umbra. Invicti esse volumus, et recte; habet enim hoc animi nostri natura post Deum a quo ad ejus imagi­ nem factus est: sed ejus praecepta erant servanda, quibus servatis nemo nos vinceret. Nunc vero, dum ipsa cujus verbis turpiter consensimus, domatur do­ lore pariendi, et nos in terra laboramus, et cum ma­ gno dedecore superamur ab omnibus quae nos com­ movere ac perturbare potuerint. Itaque nolumus ab hominibus vinci, et iram non possumus vincere. Qua turpitudine quid exsecrabilius dici potest? Fatemur hominem hoc esse quod nos sumus,qui tamen etsi ha­ beat vitia, non est tamen ipse vitium. Quanto igitur honestius homo nos vincit, quam vitium? Quis autem dubitet immane vitium esse invidentiam, qua necesse est torqueatur et subjiciatur qui non vult in rebus temporalibus vinci? Melius est ergo ut homo nos vincat, quam invidentia vel quodlibet aliud vitium.

Therefore even in this pleasure of the body we find something to remind us to despise it: not because the nature of the body is evil, but because the soul, which has been granted to cling to the first things and enjoy them, wallows shamefully in the love of the lowest good. When a charioteer is dragged along and pays the penalty for his rashness, he blames whatever it was that he was using. But let him call for help; let the Lord of things give the command; let the horses be checked (while others are already making a spectacle of his fall and would make one of his death, if no help came); let him be restored to his place, set upon the wheels, given back control of the reins, and let him guide more carefully the horses, now obedient and tamed: then he will realize how well the chariot and the whole team were built, which by his fall had both injured him and lost the course of the most fitting control. For in this way too the greed of the soul that used it badly in paradise brought forth weakness for this body, when it seized the forbidden food against the instruction of the physician, in which eternal health is contained. If, then, in this very weakness of the visible flesh, where the happy life cannot be, a reminder of the happy life is found, because of the beauty that reaches from the highest down to the lowest, how much more in the craving for nobility and eminence, and in all the pride and empty pomp of this world! For what else does a man seek in it but to be, if possible, the only one to whom all things are subject, in a perverse imitation, that is, of almighty God? If he imitated him as a subject, by living according to his commandments, he would through him have all other things subject to him, and he would not come to such deformity as to fear a little beast while wishing to rule over men. Pride, then, also has a certain craving for unity and omnipotence, but in the rule of temporal things, which all pass away like a shadow. We want to be unconquered, and rightly so; for our mind's nature has this after God, by whom it was made to his image. But his commandments were to be kept; had they been kept, no one would conquer us. But now, while she to whose words we shamefully consented is subdued by the pain of childbearing, and we toil on the earth, we are also overcome, to our great disgrace, by everything that can move and disturb us. So we do not want to be conquered by men, and we cannot conquer anger. What more detestable than this disgrace can be named? We admit that a man is what we are; and yet, even if he has vices, he is not himself a vice. How much more honorable it is, then, for a man to conquer us than a vice! And who would doubt that envy is a monstrous vice, by which anyone who does not want to be conquered in temporal things must be tormented and subdued? It is better, then, that a man should conquer us than envy or any other vice.

Gen 3:6 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 3:16 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 3:17 (allusion, medium confidence) · Gen 1:27 (allusion, medium confidence) · Ps 144:4 (143:4 LXX) (echo, low confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Even bodily pleasure and pride, rightly understood, point back to the unity and power that belong to God, and it is better to be conquered by a man than by a vice such as envy.

  • The charioteer image stands for the soul and the body after the Fall. “Forbidden food … against the instruction of the physician”: Gen 3:6, with God as physician. The digital text has a stray footnote digit (“usque 2”).

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slips; leaked footnote digit; split word; stray mark): nnde commoneamur cam contemnere; nan quia → unde commoneamur eam contemnere; non quia; male I utentis → male utentis; qnia sempiterna → qua sempiterna; nino beatae → nitio beatae; summo usque 2 ad → summo usque ad; pomp? hujus → pompa hujus; apv petit → appetit; cia sint → cta sint; habet enim boc → habet enim hoc; vin. cat → vincat.

Topics: Ethics

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Vera rel. 45 (PL 34:159; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-vera-religione/45/#p-45). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-vera-religione-45) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text of the Open Greek and Latin project); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.

Chapter 46

46PL 34:159–161

Sed nec ab homine vinci potest, qui vitia sua vicerit. Non enim vincitur, nisi cui eripitur ab adver­ sario quod amat. Qui ergo amat id solum quod amanti eripi non potest, ille indubitanter invictus est, nec illa cruciatur invidia. Id enim diligit, ad quod dili­ gendum et percipiendum quanto plures venerint, tanto eis uberius gratulatur. Diligit enim Deum ex toto corde, et ex tota anima, et ex tota mente; et diligit proximum tanquam seipsum. Non ergo illi invidet, ut sit quod ipse est; imo adjuvat etiam quantum potest. Nec potest amittere proximum, quem diligit tanquam seip­ sum; quia neque in seipso ea diligit quæ oculis subja­ cent, aut ullis aliis corporis sensibus. Ergo apud seip­ sum habet quem diligit tanquam seipsum. Ea autem est regula dilectionis, ut quae sibi vult bona provenire, et illi velit; et quae accidere sibi mala non vult, et illi nolit: hanc volun­ tatem erga omnes homines servat. Nam erga neminem operandum est malum: et dilectio proximi malum non operatur (Rom. XIII, 10). Diligamus ergo, ut præceptum est, etiam inimicos nostros, si vere invicti esse volumus. Non enim per seipsum quisquam hominum invictus est; sed per illam in­ commutabilem legem, cui quicumque serviunt, soli sunt liberi. Sic enim eis quod diligunt auferri non potest: quae res una invictos facit et perfectos viros. Nam si vel ipsum hominem homo dilexerit, non tan­ quam seipsum, sed tanquam jumentum, aut balneas, aut aviculam pictam vel garrulam, id est, ut ex eo ali­ quid temporalis voluptatis aut commodi capiat; scr­ viat necesse est, non homini, sed, quod est turpius, tam foedo et detestabili vitio, quo non amat homi­ nem sicut homo amandus est. Quo vitio dominante, us­ que ad extremam vitam, vel potius mortem perducitur. Sed nec sic quidem ab homine homo diligen­ dus est, ut diliguntur carnales fratres, vel filii, vel con­ juges, vel quique cognati, vel affines aut cives. Nam et dilectio ista temporalis est. Non enim ullas tales necessitudines haberemus, quæ nascendo et moriendo contingunt, si natura nostra in præceptis, et imagine Dei manens, in istam corruptionem non relegaretur. Itaque ad pristinam perfectamque naturam nos ipsa Veritas vocans, præcipit ut carnali consuetudini resistamus, docens neminem aptum esse regno Dei, qui non istas carnales necessitudines oderit (Luc. ix, 60, 62, et xiv, 26). Neque hoc cuiquam inhumanum videri debet. Magis enim est inhumanum, non amare in homine quod homo est, sed amare quod filius est: hoc est enim non in eo amare illud quod ad Deum pertinet, sed amare illud quod ad se pertinet. Quid ergo mirum si ad regnum non pervenit. qui non com­ munem, sed privatam rem diligit? Imo utrumque, ait quispiam: Imo illud unum, dicit Deus. Dicit enim ve­ rissime Veritas: Nemo potest duobus dominis servire. Nemo enim potest perfecte diligere quo vocamur, nisi oderit unde revocamur. Vocamur autem ad perfectam naturam humanam, qualem ante peccatum nostrum Deus fecit: revocamur autem ab ejus dilectione, quam peccando meruimus. Quam ode­ rimus oportet, unde ut liberemur optamus. Oderimus ergo temporales necessitudines, si æternitatis charitate flagramus. Diligat homo proxi­ mum tanquam seipsum. Certe enim sibi ipsi nemo est pater, aut filius, aut affinis, aut aliquid hujusmodi, sed tantum homo: qui ergo diligit aliquem tanquam seipsum, hoc in eo debet diligere, quod sibi ipse est. Corpora vero non sunt quod nos sumus: non ergo in homine corpus est expetendum aut desiderandum. Valet enim ad hoc etiam quod præceptum est: Ne concupiscat rem proximi tui. Quapro­ pter quisquis in proximo aliud diligit quam sibi ipse est, non eum diligit tanquam seipsum. Ipsa igitur na­ tura humana sine carnali conditione diligenda est, sive sit perficienda sive perfecta. Omnes sub uno Deo patre cognati sunt, qui eum diligunt et faciunt volun­ tatem ipsius. Et invicem sibi sunt, et patres cum sibi consulunt, et filii cum sibi obtemperant, et fratres maxime, quia eos unus Pater testamento suo ad unam hæreditatem vocat.

But no one can be conquered by a man who has conquered his own vices. For no one is conquered except one from whom an adversary snatches away what he loves. He, then, who loves only what cannot be snatched from one who loves it is beyond doubt unconquered, and is not tormented by that envy. For he loves something which, the more people come to love and grasp it, the more abundantly he rejoices with them. For he loves God with his whole heart, and with his whole soul, and with his whole mind; and he loves his neighbor as himself. So he does not envy him for being what he himself is; rather, he even helps him as much as he can. Nor can he lose the neighbor whom he loves as himself, since even in himself he does not love the things that lie open to the eyes or to any other bodily senses. So he has within himself the one he loves as himself. And the rule of love is this: that the goods he wishes to come to himself he wishes for the other too, and the evils he does not wish to befall himself he does not wish for the other either. This will he keeps toward all men. For evil must be done to no one, and “love of neighbor works no evil.” Let us then love even our enemies, as we are commanded, if we truly wish to be unconquered. For no human being is unconquered through himself, but through that unchangeable law which those who serve it are alone free. For in this way what they love cannot be taken from them; and this one thing makes men unconquered and perfect. For if a man loves even another man not as himself but as a beast of burden, or as the baths, or as a painted or chattering little bird, that is, in order to get from him some temporal pleasure or advantage, he must serve not a man but, what is more shameful, so foul and detestable a vice that he does not love the man as a man ought to be loved. While that vice rules, he is led on to the end of life, or rather to death. But not even in the way that brothers after the flesh, or sons, or wives, or any kindred, or relatives by marriage, or fellow citizens are loved should a man be loved by a man. For that love too is temporal. For we should have none of these ties, which arise through being born and dying, if our nature, remaining in the commandments and in the image of God, had not been banished into this corruption. And so the Truth itself, calling us back to our original and perfect nature, commands us to resist the habit of the flesh, teaching that no one is fit for the kingdom of God who does not hate these fleshly ties. Nor should this seem inhuman to anyone. For it is more inhuman to love in a man not that he is a man but that he is a son; for this is to love in him not what belongs to God, but what belongs to oneself. What wonder, then, if he does not reach the kingdom who loves not what is common but what is private? “Both rather,” someone says. “That one thing rather,” says God. For the Truth says most truly: “No one can serve two masters.” For no one can perfectly love that to which we are called, unless he hates that from which we are called back. We are called to a perfect human nature, such as God made before our sin; we are called back from the love of the nature we deserved by sinning. We must hate what we wish to be freed from. Let us then hate temporal ties, if we burn with the love of eternity. Let a man love his neighbor as himself. For surely no one is to himself a father, or son, or relative by marriage, or anything of that kind, but only a man. He then who loves someone as himself ought to love in him what he is to himself. But bodies are not what we are; so in a man the body is not to be sought or desired. For to this point also applies the commandment: “You shall not covet your neighbor's property.” Therefore whoever loves in his neighbor something other than what he is to himself does not love him as himself. Human nature itself, then, is to be loved without the condition of the flesh, whether it is still to be perfected or already perfect. All who love God and do his will are kindred under one God and Father. And they are to one another both fathers, when they counsel one another, and sons, when they obey one another, and above all brothers, because one Father by his testament calls them to one inheritance.

Matt 22:37 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 22:39 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 13:10 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 5:44 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 9:62 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 14:26 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 6:24 (quotation, high confidence) · Exod 20:17 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 12:50 (allusion, medium confidence) · Matt 23:9 (echo, low confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Whoever loves God above all and his neighbor as himself cannot be conquered, because what he loves cannot be taken from him; the neighbor is to be loved as a man, not for fleshly ties or advantage.

  • Hating fleshly ties (Luke 14:26) is interpreted here as loving in another the human being made for God rather than the kinship that arises from birth and death; Augustine places these ties among the consequences of the Fall. Migne's Scripture references in parentheses are not translated.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slip and joined words; joined words; leaked footnote digit): homiue → homine; cripilur → eripitur; sano quod amat → sario quod amat; nec i:!a cruciatur → nec illa cruciatur; lanio eis → tanto eis; ct diligit proximum tanquamseipsum → et diligit proximum tanquam seipsum; imoadjuvat → imo adjuvat; Nee potest amittere → Nec potest amittere; ant ullis → aut ullis; babet quem → habet quem; XIII, iO) → XIII, 10); eliam inimicos → etiam inimicos; balncas → balneas; exeo → ex eo; Quo vitia dominante → Quo vitio dominante; adextremam → ad extremam; Nam ct dilectio → Nam et dilectio; talcs → tales; inanens → manens; rcsisLimus → resistamus; ix, CO, 62 → ix, 60, 62; inbumanum → inhumanum; qnod homo est → quod homo est; filius est 1: → filius est:; ad Dcum → ad Deum; domin, servire → dominis servire; quovocamur → quo vocamur; revocainur → revocamur; anle peccatum → ante peccatum; Quaru → Quam; scipjum → seipsum; nemo cst pater → nemo est pater; sumns → sumus; proxilno → proximo; non cum diligit → non eum diligit; De. palre → Deo patre; uuam → unam.

Topics: Ethics

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Vera rel. 46 (PL 34:159–161; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-vera-religione/45/#p-46). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-vera-religione-46) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text of the Open Greek and Latin project); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.

Chapter 47

47PL 34:161–163

Quapropter, cur iste non invictus sit hominem diligendo, cum in eo nihil præter hominem diligat, id est creaturam Dei ad ejus imaginem factam, nec ei possit deesse perfecta natura quam diligit, cum ipse perfectus est? Sicut enim, verbi gratia, si quisquam diligat bene cantantem, non hunc aut illum, sed tau­ lum bene cantantem quemlibet, cum sit cantator ipse perfectus; ita vult omnes tales esse, ut tamen ei non desit quod diligit, quia ipse bene cantat. Nam si cui­ quam invidet bene cantanti, non jam illud diligit, sed aut laudem, aut aliquid aliud, quo bene cantando vult pervenire; et potest ei minui vel auferri, si et alius bene cantaverit. Qui ergo invidet bene cantanti, non amat bene cantantem: sed rursus qui eo indiget, non bene cantat. Quod multo accommodatius de bene vi­ vente dici potest, quia invidere nulli potest: quo enim perveniunt bene viventes, tantumdem est omnibus nec olus fit cum plures habuerint. Et potest esse tempus quo bonus cantator cantare non decenter queat, et indigeat voce alterius, qua sibi exhibeatur quod diligit; tanquam si alicubi convivetur, ubi eum cantare turpe sit, sed deceat audire cantantem: bene autem vivere semper decet. Quare quisquis hoc et di­ ligit et facit, non solum non invidet imitantibus, sed et his se præbet libentissime atque humanissime quan­ tum potest; nec tamen eis indiget. Nam quod in illis diligit, in seipso habet totum atque perfectum. Ita cum diligit proximum tanquam seipsum, non invidet ei, quia nec sibi ipsi; præstat ei quod potest, quia et sibi ipsi; non eo indiget, quia nec seipso: lan­ tum Deo indiget, cui adhærendo beatus est. Nemo autem illi eripit Deum. Ille ergo verissime atque cer­ tissime invictus homo est qui cohæret Deo, non ut ab eo aliquid boni extra mereatur, sed cui nihil aliud quam ipsum hærere Deo bonum est. Hic vir quamdiu est in hac vita, utitur amico ad repcndendam gratiam, utitur inimico ad patientiam, utitur quibus potest ad beneficentiam, utitur omnibus ad benevolentiam. Et quanquam temporalia non dili­ gat, ipse recte utitur temporalibus, et pro eorum sorte hominibus consulit, si æqualiter non potest omnibus. Quare si aliquem familiarium suorum promptius quam quemlibet alloquitur, non eum magis diligit, sed ad eum habet majorem fiduciam, et apertiorem temporis januam. Tractat enim tempori deditos tanto melius, quanto minus ipse obligatus est tempori. Cum itaque omnibus,quos pariter diligit, prodesse non possit,nisi conjunctioribus prodesse malit, injustus est. Animi autem conjunctio major est, quam locorum aut tem­ porum quibus in hoc corpore gignimur; sed ea maxi­ ma est quæ omnibus prævalet. Non ergo iste affligitur morte cujusquam, quoniam qui toto animo Deum di­ ligit, novit nec sibi perire quod Deo non perit. Deus autem dominus est et vivorum et mortuorum. Non cujusquam miseria miser est, quia nec cujusquam ju­ stitia justus est. Et ut nemo illi justitiam et Deum, sic nemo aufert beatitudinem. Et si aliquando forte alicujus periculo, vel errore, vel dolore commovetur; usque ad illius auxilium, aut correctionem, aut con­ solationem, non usque ad suam subversionem valere patitur. In omnibus autem officiosis laboribus, futurae quietis certa exspectatione, non frangitur. Quid enim ei nocebit, qui bene uti etiam inimico potest? Ejus enim præsidio atque munimento inimicitias non per­ timescit, cujus præcepto et dono diligit inimicos. Huic viro in tribulationibus parum est non contristari, nisi etiam gaudeat, sciens quod tribulatio patientiam operatur, patientia probationem, probatio spem, spes autem non confundit: quoniam charitas Dei diffusa est in cordibus nostris per Spiritum sanctum, qui datus est nobis. Quis huic nocebit? Quis hunc subjugabit? Homo qui prosperis rebus proficit, asperis quid profecerit discit. Cum enim mutabilium bono­ rum adest copia, non eis confidit; sed cum sub­ trahuntur, agnoscit utrum eum non ceperint: quia plerumque cum adsunt nobis, putamus quod non ea diligamus; sed cum abesse coeperint, invenimus qui simus. Hoc enim sine amore nostro aderat, quod sine dolore discedit. Videtur ergo vincere, cum vincatur, qui superando ad id pervenit, quod cum dolore amis­ surus est: et vincit cum vinci videatur, quisquis ce­ dendo ad id pervenit, quod non amittit invitus.

Why, then, should this man not be unconquered in loving a man, since he loves nothing in him but the man, that is, a creature of God made to his image, and since the perfect nature he loves cannot be lacking to him, when he himself is perfect? For example, if someone loves a good singer, not this one or that one, but any good singer at all, being himself a perfect singer, he wishes all to be such, yet without what he loves being lacking to him, because he himself sings well. For if he envies anyone who sings well, he no longer loves that, but either praise or something else which he wants to obtain by singing well, and which can be lessened or taken from him if another also sings well. He, then, who envies a good singer does not love the good singer; and again, he who needs him does not himself sing well. This can be said much more fittingly of the one who lives well, because he can envy no one: for what those who live well attain is the same for all, and it does not become less when more have it. There can be a time when a good singer cannot fittingly sing, and needs another's voice by which what he loves is offered to him, as when he is at a banquet somewhere where it would be unseemly for him to sing but seemly to listen to a singer; but to live well is always seemly. So whoever both loves and does this not only does not envy those who imitate him, but gives himself to them most gladly and most kindly as far as he can; and yet he does not need them. For what he loves in them he has whole and perfect in himself. So when he loves his neighbor as himself, he does not envy him, because he does not envy himself; he gives him what he can, because he does so for himself too; he does not need him, because he does not need himself either: he needs only God, by clinging to whom he is happy. And no one snatches God from him. That man, then, is most truly and most surely unconquered who clings to God, not so as to earn some good from him outside him, but one for whom nothing other than clinging to God is good. Such a man, as long as he is in this life, uses a friend for repaying kindness, uses an enemy for patience, uses those he can for doing good, uses all for good will. And though he does not love temporal things, he himself uses temporal things rightly, and looks after men according to their lot, if he cannot do so equally for all. So if he speaks more readily to one of his close friends than to anyone else, it is not that he loves him more, but that he has greater confidence toward him and a more open door of opportunity. For he deals with those given over to time the better, the less he himself is bound to time. So since he cannot benefit all whom he loves equally, he would be unjust if he did not prefer to benefit those more closely joined to him. And a bond of mind is greater than one of the places or times in which we are born in this body; but the greatest is the one that prevails over all. So this man is not afflicted by anyone's death, since he who loves God with his whole mind knows that what does not perish to God does not perish to him either. And God is Lord of both the living and the dead. He is not wretched through anyone's wretchedness, because he is not just through anyone's justice either. And as no one takes justice and God from him, so no one takes away his happiness. And if at times he is moved by someone's danger, or error, or grief, he lets it avail as far as helping, correcting, or consoling the other, not as far as his own overthrow. And in all dutiful labors he is not broken, through the sure expectation of the rest to come. For what will harm him who can make good use even of an enemy? For he does not fear enmities, protected and defended by him at whose command and by whose gift he loves his enemies. For such a man it is too little not to be saddened in tribulations, unless he also rejoices, knowing that “tribulation works patience, patience proof, proof hope, and hope does not put to shame; because the love of God has been poured out in our hearts through the Holy Spirit who has been given to us.” Who will harm him? Who will subdue him? A man who makes progress in prosperity learns in adversity what progress he has made. For when there is plenty of changeable goods, he does not trust them; but when they are withdrawn, he discovers whether they had not taken hold of him. For often, when they are with us, we think that we do not love them; but when they begin to be absent, we find out who we are. For what was present without our love departs without our grief. So the one who seems to conquer is conquered, if by overcoming he attains what he will lose with grief; and the one who seems to be conquered conquers, if by yielding he attains what he does not lose against his will.

Matt 22:39 (allusion, high confidence) · Rom 14:9 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 5:44 (allusion, high confidence) · Rom 5:3 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 5:4 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 5:5 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The man who loves in others only what he has perfectly in himself, and who clings to God alone, envies no one, uses all things and people rightly, and cannot be conquered or robbed of happiness.

  • “It does not become less”: the digital text reads “nec olus fit”, probably for “nec minus fit”; translated by sense. “Whether they had not taken hold of him” renders “utrum eum non ceperint”.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slips; stray mark): De. ad ejus imaginenI → Dei ad ejus imaginem; gratii → gratia; can:at → cantat; invidct → invidet; sed. aut → sed aut; canlanti → cantanti; cantautem → cantantem; qnia invidere → quia invidere; bcne viventes, tantumdem eat → bene viventes, tantumdem est; £t potest → Et potest; scd deceat → sed deceat; ligil et facit → ligit et facit; scipso habet → seipso habet; Iia cum → Ita cum; quia ct sibi → quia et sibi; Ncmo autem → Nemo autem; vcrissime → verissime; extra merentur → extra mereatur; bonum csl. IIic → bonum est. Hic; gratiani → gratiam; Luminibus consulit → hominibus consulit; non cum magis → non eum magis; ad oum habet → ad eum habet; dedilos → deditos; diligjt → diligit; gignimurl; → gignimur;; max! → maxi; afQigitur → affligitur; auimo → animo; outem dominus → autem dominus; nee cujusquam → nec cujusquam; estI. → est.; beatiLnJinem → beatitudinem; vcl errore → vel errore; corrcctionem → correctionem; probalio → probatio; noa confundit: quomam charitas Dci → non confundit: quoniam charitas Dei; utrum cum non cepcrint → utrum eum non ceperint.

Topics: Ethics

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Vera rel. 47 (PL 34:161–163; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-vera-religione/45/#p-47). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-vera-religione-47) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text of the Open Greek and Latin project); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.

Chapter 48

48PL 34:163

Quem ergo delectat libertas, ab amore muta­ bilium rerum liber esse appetat; et quem regnare delectat, uni omnium regnatori Deo subditus hæreat, plus eum diligendo quam seipsum. Et hæc est per­ fecta justitia, qua potius potiora, et minus minora diligimus. Sapientem animam atque perfectam talem diligat, qualem illam videt; stultam non talem, sed quia esse perfecta et sapiens potest: quia nec seipsum debet stultum diligere. Nam qui se diligit stultum, non proficiet ad sapientiam; nec fiet quisquis qualis cupit esse, nisi se oderit qualis est. Sed donec ad sa­ pientiam perfectionemque veniatur, eo animo ferat stultitiam proximi, quo suam ferret, si stultus esset, et amaret sapientiam. Quapropter si et ipsa superbia verax libertatis et veri regni umbra est, etiam per ipsam nos commemorat divina providentia quid significemus vitiosi, et quo debeamus redire correcti.

Let him, then, who delights in freedom seek to be free from the love of changeable things; and let him who delights in ruling cling, as a subject, to the one ruler of all, God, loving him more than himself. And this is perfect justice, by which we love the better things more and the lesser things less. Let him love a wise and perfect soul as he sees it to be; a foolish one not as it is, but because it can become perfect and wise; for he ought not to love even himself as foolish. For he who loves himself as foolish will not make progress toward wisdom; nor will anyone become what he desires to be unless he hates himself as he is. But until wisdom and perfection are reached, let him bear his neighbor's folly with the same mind with which he would bear his own if he were foolish and loved wisdom. Therefore, if even pride itself is a shadow of true freedom and true kingship, through it too divine providence reminds us what we signify when we are corrupt, and where we ought to return when we are corrected.

Notes and citation

Summary: True freedom and rule come from loving God above oneself and loving each thing in its due measure; even pride is a shadow that points back to true freedom.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; split word): qucm regnare → quem regnare; Dea subditus → Deo subditus; Sapieulem → Sapientem; talcm diligat → talem diligat; scipsuln → seipsum; diligcre → diligere; nee fiet → nec fiet; donac → donec; slulius → stultus; eliam per ipsam → etiam per ipsam; si. gnificemus → significemus.

Topics: Ethics

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Vera rel. 48 (PL 34:163; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-vera-religione/45/#p-48). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-vera-religione-48) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text of the Open Greek and Latin project); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.

Chapter 49

49PL 34:163–165

Jam vero cuncta spectacula, et omnis illa quae appellatur curiositas, quid aliud quærit quam de rerum cognitione lætitiam? Quid ergo admirabilius, quid speciosius ipsa veritate, ad quam omnis specta­ lor pervenire se cupere confitetur, cum vehementer ne fallatur invigilat, et inde se jactat si quid acutius cæteris, et vivacius in spectando cognoscat et judicet? Ipsum denique praestigiatorem, nihil aliud quam fal­ laciam profitentem, diligenter intuentur, et cautissime observant; et si eluduntur, quia sua non possunt, illius delectantur scientia qui eos eludit. Nam si et ille nesciret quibus causis fallantur intuentes, vel ne­ scire crederetur, pariter erranti nullus plauderet. Si quis autem de populo unus eum deprehenderit, ma­ jorem illo laudem se mereri putat, non ob aliud, nisi quia decipi fallique non potuit. Si autem multis apcr­ tus sit, non ille laudatur; sed irridentur cæteri qui talia deprehendere nequeunt. Ita omnis palma cogni­ tioni datur, et artificio, et comprehensioni veritatis: ad quam nullo modo perveniunt qui foris eam quaerunt. Itaque in tantas nugas et turpitudines mersi sumus, ut cum interrogati quid sit melius, verum an falsum, ore uno respondeamus, verum esse melius; jocis et ludis tamen, ubi nos utique non vera, sed ficta delectant, multo propensius quam praeceptis ipsius veritatis hæreamus. Ita nostro judicio et ore puni­ mur, aliud ratione approbantes, aliud vanitate sectan­ tes. Tamdiu autem est ludicrum et joculare aliquid, quamdiu novimus in cujus veri comparatione rideatur. Sed diligendo talia excidimus a vero, et non jam inve­ nimus quarum rerum imitamenta sint, quibus tanquam primis pulchris inhiamus, et ab eis recedentes am­ plexamur nostra phantasmata. Nam redeuntibus nobis ad investigandam veritatem, ipsa in itinere occurrunt, et nos transire non sinunt, nullis viribus, sed magnis insidiis latrocinantia, non intelligentibus quam late pateat quod dictum est: Cavete a simulacris. Itaque alii per innumerabiles mundos vaga co­ gitatione volutati sunt. Alii Deum esse non posse, nisi corpus igneum putaverunt. Alii candorem lucis immensæ per infinita spatia usquequaque porrectum, ex una tamen parte quasi nigro quodam cuneo fissum. duo adversa regna opinantes, et talia rebus consti­ tuentes principia, cum suis phantasmatibus fabulati sunt. Quos si jurare cogam utrum hæc vera esse sciant, fortasse non audeant, sed vicissim dicant: Tu igitur ostende quid verum sit. Quibus si nihil respon­ deam, nisi ut illam lucem quærant, qua eis apparet et certum est aliud esse credere, aliud intelligere; jurarent et ipsi, nec oculis videri posse istam lucem, nec cum aliqua locorum vastitate cogitari, et nusquam non præsto esse quaerentibus, et nihil ea certius atque serenius inveniri. Quæ rursus omnia, quae de hac luce mentis nunc a me dicta sunt, nulla alia quam eadem luce manifesta sunt. Per hanc enim intelligo vera esse quæ dicta sunt, et hæc me intelligere per hanc rursus in­ telligo. Et huc rursus et rursus cum quisque se aliquid intelligere intelligit, et idipsum rursus intelligit, in infinitum pergere intelligo, et nulla hic esse spatia cujusquam tumoris aut volubilitatis intelligo: intel­ ligo etiam non me posse intelligere, nisi vivam, et me vivaciorem intelligendo fieri, certius intelligo. Æterna enim vita vitam temporalem vivacitate ipsa superat: nec quid sit aeternitas, nisi intelligendo conspicio. Mentis quippe aspectu omnem mutabilitatem ab aeter­ nitate sejungo, et in ipsa aeternitate nulla spatia tem­ poris cerno; quia spatia temporis praeteritis et futuris rerum motibus constant. Nihil autem præterit in æterno, et nihil futurum est; quia et quod praeterit, esse desinit, et quod futurum est, nondum esse coepit: æternitas autem, tantummodo est; nec fuit, quasi jam non sit; nec erit, quasi adhuc non sit. Quare sola ipsa verissime dicere potuit humanae menti, Ego sum qui sum; et de illa verissime dici potuit, Misit me, qui est.

Again, all spectacles and everything that is called curiosity: what do they seek but the joy of knowing things? What, then, is more wonderful, what more beautiful, than truth itself, which every spectator admits he desires to reach, when he watches keenly not to be deceived, and boasts if he perceives and judges something more sharply and more quickly than others in the watching? Even a conjurer, who professes nothing but deception, they watch closely and observe most carefully; and if they are fooled, since they cannot delight in their own knowledge, they delight in the knowledge of the man who fools them. For if he too did not know by what means the spectators are deceived, or were believed not to know, no one would applaud him, since he would be in error like them. But if one of the crowd catches him out, he thinks he deserves greater praise than the conjurer, for no other reason than that he could not be deceived and fooled. And if the trick is plain to many, the conjurer is not praised, but the others who cannot catch such things are laughed at. So every prize is given to knowledge, and skill, and the grasp of truth; which those who seek it outside never reach. And so we are sunk in such trifles and shameful things that when asked which is better, the true or the false, we answer with one voice that the true is better; yet we cling far more eagerly to jests and games, where it is certainly not true things but fictions that delight us, than to the precepts of truth itself. So we are punished by our own judgment and our own mouth, approving one thing by reason and following another through vanity. Yet a thing is laughable and amusing only as long as we know the truth in comparison with which it is laughed at. But by loving such things we fall away from the true, and no longer find of what things they are imitations; we gape at them as if they were the first beauties, and, withdrawing from those beauties, we embrace our own phantoms. For when we return to search for the truth, these meet us on the way and do not let us pass, waylaying us not by force but by great ambushes, because we do not understand how widely that saying applies: “Beware of idols.” And so some have wandered in roving thought through innumerable worlds. Others have thought that God could only be a fiery body. Others, imagining the brightness of an immense light stretched out in every direction through infinite spaces, yet split on one side as by a kind of black wedge, and supposing two opposed kingdoms and setting up such principles of things, have told tales with their phantoms. If I were to make them swear whether they know these things to be true, perhaps they would not dare, but would say in turn, “Then you show what is true.” If I answered them only by telling them to seek that light by which it is evident and certain to them that believing is one thing and understanding another, they themselves would swear that this light cannot be seen with the eyes, nor thought of with any vastness of places, and that it is everywhere present to those who seek it, and that nothing more certain and more serene can be found. And again, all that I have now said about this light of the mind is made plain by no other light than this same light. For through it I understand that what has been said is true, and through it again I understand that I understand this. And I understand that this goes on again and again to infinity, when anyone understands that he understands something and again understands that very thing; and I understand that here there are no spaces of any bulk or motion. I understand also that I cannot understand unless I live, and I understand more certainly that by understanding I become more alive. For eternal life surpasses temporal life by its very liveliness; nor do I behold what eternity is except by understanding. For by the gaze of the mind I separate all changeableness from eternity, and in eternity itself I see no spaces of time; because spaces of time consist of the past and future motions of things. But in the eternal nothing passes and nothing is future: for what passes ceases to be, and what is future has not yet begun to be; but eternity only is; it neither was, as though it no longer is, nor will be, as though it is not yet. Therefore it alone could say most truly to the human mind, “I am who am”; and of it could be said most truly, “He who is has sent me.”

1 John 5:21 (quotation, high confidence) · Exod 3:14 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Curiosity and the love of spectacles are a distorted desire for truth; the mind's own light shows the falsehood of materialist and Manichaean fantasies and leads to the eternal being of God.

  • “Beware of idols”: 1 John 5:21 (Vulgate “custodite vos a simulacris”; Augustine's wording differs). The innumerable worlds are those of the Epicureans; God as a fiery body is the Stoic view; the light split by a black wedge, with two opposed kingdoms, is the Manichaean account, described here as Augustine gives it.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slips; joined words; split word): Jam vcro cuncta spectacula, ct omnis illa quoe → Jam vero cuncta spectacula, et omnis illa quae; de re.. rum → de rerum; vcrilaLis → veritatis; p£rveniunt → perveniunt; respondcamus → respondeamus; iicta delectant → ficta delectant; latroemantia → latrocinantia; igncum → igneum; atqae → atque; qn:e de hac → quae de hac; nulla hie esse → nulla hic esse; praeteritisct → praeteritis et.

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Vera rel. 49 (PL 34:163–165; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-vera-religione/45/#p-49). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-vera-religione-49) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text of the Open Greek and Latin project); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.

Chapter 50

50PL 34:165

Cui si nondum possumus inhærere, objurgemus saltem nostra phantasmata, et tam nugatorios et de­ ceptorios ludos de spectaculo mentis ejiciamus. Uta­ mur gradibus quos nobis divina providentia fabricare dignata est. Cum enim figmentis ludicris nimium delectati evanesceremus in cogitationibus nostris, et totam vitam in quaedam vana somnia verteremus; rationali creatura serviente legibus suis, per sonos ac litteras, ignem, fumum, nubem, columnam, quasi quædam verba visibilia, cum infantia nostra para­ bolis ac similitudinibus quodammodo ludere, et inte­ riores oculos nostros luto hujuscemodi curare non aspernata est ineffabilis misericordia Dei. Distinguamus ergo quam fidem debeamus histo­ riae, quam fidem debeamus intelligentiae, quid mandemus memoriae, verum esse nescientes, sed credentes tamen. Et ubi sit verum, quod non venit et transit, sed semper eodem modo manet. Qui sit modus interpretandæ allegoriæ, quae per sapientiam dicta credi­ tur in Spiritu sancto: utrum a visibilibus antiquioribus ad visibilia recentiora eam perducere sufficiat; an usque ad animæ affectiones atque naturam, an usque ad incommutabilem æternitatem: an aliae significent gesta visibilia, aliae motus animorum, aliae legem æternitatis; an aliquæ inveniantur, in quibus hæc omnia vestiganda sint. Et quae sit stabilis fides, sive historica et temporalis, sive spiritualis et æterna, ad quam omnis interpretatio Auctoritatis dirigenda sit. Et quid prosit ad intelligenda et obtinenda æterna, ubi finis est omnium bonarum actionum, fides rerum temporalium. Et quid intersit inter allegoriam histo­ riae et allegoriam facti, et allegoriam sermonis, et allegoriam sacramenti. Et quomodo ipsa locutio divi­ narum Scripturarum secundum cujusque linguae proprietatem accipienda sit. Habet enim omnis lingua sua quaedam propria genera locutionum, quae cum in aliam linguam transferuntur, videntur absurda. Quid prosit tanta loquendi humilitas, ut non solum ira Dei, et tristitia, et a somno expergefactio, et memoria, et oblivio, et alia nonnulla quæ in bonos homines cadere possunt, sed etiam pænitentiæ, zeli, crapulæ nomina, et alia hujusmodi in sacris Libris inveniantur. Et utrum oculi Dei, et manus; et pedes, et alia hujus generis membra, quæ in Scripturis nominantur, ad visibilem formam humani corporis referenda sint; an ad significationes intelligibilium et spiritualium po­ tentiarum, sicut galea, et scutum, et gladius, et cin­ gulum, et cætera talia. Et quod maxime quærendum est, quid prosit generi humano, quod sic nobiscum per rationalem, et genitalem, et corporalem creaturam sibi servientem divina providentia locuta est. Quo uno cognito, omnis ab animis protervitas puerilis ex­ cluditur, et introducitur sacrosancta religio.

If we cannot yet cling to it, let us at least rebuke our phantoms and cast out of the theater of the mind games so trifling and deceptive. Let us use the steps which divine providence has deigned to build for us. For when, too much delighted by playful fictions, we were vanishing into our own thoughts and turning our whole life into empty dreams, the ineffable mercy of God did not disdain, through the rational creature serving its laws, by sounds and letters, fire, smoke, cloud, pillar, as by visible words, to play in a way with our infancy by parables and likenesses, and to heal our inner eyes with clay of this kind. Let us distinguish, then, what faith we owe to history and what faith to understanding; what we commit to memory without knowing it to be true, yet believing it; and where the true is, which does not come and pass away but always remains in the same way. What is the method of interpreting allegory, which is believed to be spoken through wisdom in the Holy Spirit: whether it is enough to carry it from older visible things to more recent visible things, or on to the affections and nature of the soul, or on to unchangeable eternity; or whether some allegories signify visible deeds, others movements of minds, others the law of eternity; or whether some are found in which all these are to be traced. And what is the stable faith, whether historical and temporal or spiritual and eternal, to which all interpretation of Authority must be directed. And what faith in temporal things profits for understanding and holding the eternal, where the end of all good actions lies. And what difference there is between allegory of history, allegory of fact, allegory of speech, and allegory of sacrament. And how the very language of the divine Scriptures is to be taken according to the idiom of each tongue. For every language has certain kinds of expression of its own, which seem absurd when they are carried over into another language. What is the profit of such lowliness of speech that in the sacred books are found not only the anger of God, and sadness, and waking from sleep, and memory and forgetting, and some other things that can befall good men, but even the words repentance, jealousy, drunkenness, and others of the kind. And whether the eyes of God, and hands, and feet, and other members of this kind named in the Scriptures, are to be referred to the visible form of the human body, or to the meanings of intelligible and spiritual powers, like helmet, and shield, and sword, and belt, and the like. And, what is most to be asked, what profit it is to the human race that divine providence has spoken with us in this way through the rational, generative, and bodily creature serving it. Once this one thing is known, all childish insolence is shut out of minds, and holy religion is brought in.

Exod 13:21 (allusion, high confidence) · Exod 19:18 (allusion, medium confidence) · John 9:6 (allusion, medium confidence) · Rom 1:21 (echo, low confidence) · Eph 6:14 (allusion, medium confidence) · Eph 6:17 (allusion, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: God in his mercy has given humanity visible signs, Scriptures, and allegories as steps to the truth, and Augustine lists the questions about history, allegory, and biblical language that must be settled to read them rightly.

  • “Fire, smoke, cloud, pillar”: the signs of the exodus and Sinai (Exod 13:21; 19:18). “Heal our inner eyes with clay”: an allusion to John 9:6. The terms for the kinds of allegory (historiae, facti, sermonis, sacramenti) are Augustine's own and are rendered literally. “Authority” renders “Auctoritas”, Scripture as authority. Helmet, shield, sword, belt: Eph 6:14–17.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; joined words; leaked footnote digit; stray mark): Uia → Uta; creatura 1 serviente → creatura serviente; nores oculos → riores oculos; bujuscemodi → hujuscemodi; ubi sit vcrum → ubi sit verum; codem modo → eodem modo; recenliora → recentiora; atquenaturam → atque naturam; animorumù → animorum; HI quibus → in quibus; s:nt → sint; qu:e sit stabilis → quae sit stabilis; ri;et → riae; cujnsque → cujusque; prof prietatem → proprietatem; qu:rdam → quaedam; qure cum → quae cum; aliani → aliam; . zeli → , zeli; gencris → generis; spirilualium → spiritualium; nobiseum → nobiscum; crealuratn → creaturam.

Topics: Scripture and canon

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Vera rel. 50 (PL 34:165; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-vera-religione/45/#p-50). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-vera-religione-50) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text of the Open Greek and Latin project); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.

Chapter 51

51PL 34:165

Omissis igitur et repudiatis nugis theatricis et poeticis, divinarum Scripturarum consideratione et tractatione pascamus animum atque potemus vanae curiositatis fame ac siti fessum et aestuantem, et ina­ nibus phantasmatibus, tanquam pictis epulis, frustra refici satiarique cupientem: hoc vere liberali, et ingenuo ludo salubriter erudiamur. Si nos miracula spe­ ctaculorum, et pulchritudo delectant, illam desidere­ mus videre Sapientiam, quæ pertendit a fine usque ad finem fortiter, et disponit omnia suaviter (Sap. VIII, 1). Quid enim mirabilius, vi incorporea mundum corpo­ reum fabricante et administrante? aut quid pulchrius ordinante et ornante?

So, leaving aside and rejecting the trifles of the theater and the poets, let us feed and refresh with the study and handling of the divine Scriptures a mind worn out and parched by the hunger and thirst of vain curiosity, and longing in vain to be refreshed and filled with empty phantoms, as with painted banquets. Let us be trained in a healthful way by this truly liberal and noble game. If the wonders and beauty of spectacles delight us, let us long to see that Wisdom which “reaches from end to end mightily, and orders all things sweetly.” For what is more wonderful than an incorporeal power that builds and governs the corporeal world? Or what more beautiful than that power ordering and adorning it?

Notes and citation

Summary: Instead of theater and poetry, the mind should feed on the Scriptures and long to see the Wisdom that orders the whole world.

  • The quotation is Wis 8:1.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slip in Migne's reference; split word and OCR slip): inge. nno → ingenuo; dclectant → delectant; (Sap. VI.I, 4) → (Sap. VIII, 1).

Extrabiblical texts: Wis 8:1 (Wisdom of Solomon [in RC, EO, ETH canons]; quotation)

Topics: Scripture and canon

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Vera rel. 51 (PL 34:165; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-vera-religione/45/#p-51). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-vera-religione-51) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text of the Open Greek and Latin project); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.

Chapter 52

52PL 34:165–167

Si autem omnes fatentur per corpus ista sen­ tiri, et animum meliorem esse quam corpus, nihilne per se animus ipse conspiciet, aut quod conspiciet potest esse, nisi multo excellentius longeque pra­ stantius? Imo vero commemorati ab iis quæ judicamus, intueri quid sit secundum quod judicamus, et ab operibus artium conversi ad legem artium, eam spe­ ciem mente contuebimur, cujus comparatione fœda sunt quae ipsius benignitate sunt pulchra. invisibilia enim Dei, a creatura mundi, per ea quae facta sunt, in­ tellecta conspiciuntur, et sempiterna ejus virtus et divi­ nitas. Hæc est a temporalibus ad æterna regressio, et ex vita veteris hominis in novum homi­ nem reformatio. Quid est autem unde homo comme­ morari non possit ad virtutes capessendas, quando de Ipsis vitiis potest? Quid enim appetit curiositas nisi cognitionem, quae certa esse non potest, nisi rerum æternarum et eodem modo se semper habentium? Quid appetit superbia nisi potentiam, quæ refertur ad agendi facilitatem, quam non invenit anima perfecta nisi Deo subdita, et ad ejus regnum summa charitate conversa? Quid appetit voluptas corporis nisi quie­ tem, quae non est nisi ubi nulla est indigentia et nulla corruptio? Cavendi sunt ergo inferiores inferi, id est post hanc vitam pœnæ graviores, ubi nulla potest esse commemoratio veritatis, quia nulla ratiocinatio: ideo nulla ratiocinatio, quia non eam perfundit lumen verum, quod illuminat omnem hominem venientem in hunc mundum. Quare festinemus, et ambulemus cum dies praesto est, ne nos tenebrae comprehendant. Festinemus a secunda morte liberari, ubi nemo est qui memor Dei sit, et ab inferno, ubi nemo con­ fitebitur Deo (Psal. VI, 6).

But if all admit that these things are perceived through the body, and that the mind is better than the body, will the mind see nothing by itself? Or can what it sees be anything but far more excellent and far superior? Rather, reminded by the things we judge, let us look at what it is by which we judge; and, turning from the works of the arts to the law of the arts, we shall behold with the mind that beauty in comparison with which the things that are beautiful by its kindness are ugly. “For the invisible things of God, from the creation of the world, are clearly seen, being understood through the things that are made, his eternal power also and divinity.” This is the return from temporal things to eternal, and the re-forming from the life of the old man into the new man. What is there from which a man cannot be reminded to take up the virtues, when he can be reminded by the vices themselves? For what does curiosity seek but knowledge, which cannot be certain except of eternal things that are always the same? What does pride seek but power, which refers to ease of action, and which the soul does not find perfect unless it is subject to God and turned to his kingdom with the highest love? What does bodily pleasure seek but rest, which exists only where there is no want and no corruption? Therefore we must beware of the lower hell, that is, the heavier punishments after this life, where there can be no remembrance of truth, because there is no reasoning; and no reasoning because the true light, “which enlightens every man coming into this world,” does not flood it. So let us hasten and walk while it is day, lest darkness overtake us. Let us hasten to be freed from the second death, where there is no one who is mindful of God, and from hell, where no one will confess to God.

Rom 1:20 (quotation, high confidence) · Eph 4:22 (allusion, medium confidence) · Eph 4:24 (allusion, medium confidence) · John 1:9 (quotation, high confidence) · John 12:35 (allusion, high confidence) · Rev 20:14 (allusion, medium confidence) · Ps 6:5 (6:6 LXX) (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The mind should turn from the beauty it perceives through the senses to the eternal law by which it judges, for curiosity, pride, and pleasure are distorted longings for knowledge, power, and rest found only in God.

  • “The lower hell” renders “inferiores inferi”. Migne's parenthetical reference is not translated; “where no one will confess to God” is Ps 6:5 (6:6 LXX/Vulgate).

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slips; joined words; stray mark): potes: esse → potest esse; commemorati I ab → commemorati ab; secundumquod → secundum quod; cam spe → eam spe; que facta sunt → quae facta sunt; virtus ei divi → virtus et divi; autcm unde → autem unde; qunc certa → quae certa; subdita I, → subdita,; tcm, quae → tem, quae; pst haric → post hanc; ratiocinalio: ideo nulla ratorinatio → ratiocinatio: ideo nulla ratiocinatio; non cam perfundit → non eam perfundit; Quarc → Quare; prresto → praesto; fltebitur Dco (PsaL → fitebitur Deo (Psal..

Topics: Eschatology

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Vera rel. 52 (PL 34:165–167; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-vera-religione/45/#p-52). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-vera-religione-52) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text of the Open Greek and Latin project); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.

Chapter 53

53PL 34:167

Sed miseri homines, quibus cognita vilescunt, et novitatibus gaudent, libentius discunt quam no­ runt, cum cognitio sit finis discendi. Et quibus vilis est facilitas actionis, libentius certant quam vincunt, cum victoria sit finis certandi. Et quibus vilis est cor­ poris salus, malunt vesci quam satiari, et malunt frui genitalibus membris quam nullam talem commotio­ nem pati; inveniuntur etiam qui malunt dormire quam non dormitare: cum omnis illius voluptatis sit finis, non esurire ac sitire, et non desiderare concubitum, et non esse corpore fatigato. Quare qui fines ipsos desiderant, prius curiositate carent, cognoscentes eam esse certam cognitio­ nem quae intus est, et ea perfruentes quantum in hac vita queunt. Deinde accipiunt actionis facilitatem per­ vicacia posita, scientes majorem esse facilioremque victoriam, non resistere animositati cujusquam; et hoc, quantum in hac vita queunt, sentiunt: postremo, etiam quietem corporis, abstinendo ab iis rebus sine quibus agi haec vita potest; ita gustant quam suavis est Dominus. Nec erit dubium quid post hanc vitam futurum sit; et perfectionis suæ fide, spe, charitate nutriuntur. Post hanc autem vitam et cognitio perfi­ cietur; quia ex parte nunc scimus, cum autem venerit quod perfectum est, non erit ex parte: et pax omnis aderit; nunc enim alia lex in mem­ bris meis repugnat legi mentis meae, sed liberabit nos de corpore mortis hujus gratia Dei per Jesum Chri­ stum Dominum nostrum; quia ex magna parte concordamus cum adversario, dum cum illo sumus in via: et tota sanitas, et nulla indigentia, et nulla fatigatio aderit corpori; quia corruptibile hoc, tempore atque ordine suo quo resurrectio carnis fu­ tura est, induetur incorruptione. Non mirum autem, si hoc dabitur iis qui in cognitione so­ lam veritatem amant, et in actione solam pacem, et in corpore solam sanitatem. Hoc enim in eis perficie­ tur post hanc vitam, quod in hac vita plus diligunt.

But wretched men, to whom what is known becomes cheap and who rejoice in novelties, would rather learn than know, though knowledge is the end of learning. And those to whom ease of action is cheap would rather strive than win, though victory is the end of striving. And those to whom the health of the body is cheap would rather eat than be filled, and would rather enjoy the genital members than suffer no such excitement; there are even those who would rather sleep than not be drowsy, though the end of all that pleasure is not to hunger and thirst, not to desire intercourse, and not to be wearied in body. Therefore those who desire the ends themselves first are free of curiosity, knowing that the certain knowledge is the one that is within, and enjoying it as far as they can in this life. Next they receive ease of action, laying aside obstinacy, knowing that the greater and easier victory is not to resist anyone's hostility; and this they experience as far as they can in this life. Last, they receive rest of the body also, by abstaining from the things without which this life can be lived; so they taste how sweet the Lord is. Nor will they doubt what is to come after this life; and they are nourished in their perfection by faith, hope, and love. But after this life knowledge will be made perfect, because “now we know in part, but when that which is perfect has come, it will not be in part”; and all peace will be present, for now “another law in my members fights against the law of my mind, but the grace of God through Jesus Christ our Lord will free us from the body of this death,” because for the most part we agree with our adversary while we are with him on the way; and complete health, and no want, and no weariness will be present to the body, because “this corruptible” will, in its time and order, when the resurrection of the flesh is to take place, “put on incorruption.” And it is no wonder if this will be given to those who in knowledge love only truth, in action only peace, and in the body only health. For in them after this life will be perfected what in this life they love more.

Ps 34:8 (33:9 LXX) (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 13:9 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 13:10 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 7:23 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 7:24 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 7:25 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 5:25 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:53 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 13:13 (allusion, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Those who love the true ends of knowledge, action, and bodily life, namely truth, peace, and health, receive a foretaste of them now and their perfection after the resurrection.

  • Augustine paraphrases Rom 7:23–25 in the first person, as Paul wrote it.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slips; stray mark): vilis eat facilitas → vilis est facilitas; quam. non dormitare → quam non dormitare; desiderare. concubitum → desiderare concubitum; curio- Illate → curiositate; vietoriam → victoriam; dubium I quid → dubium quid; coguilio → cognitio; cictur; → cietur;; nunc cnim → nunc enim; ct nulla indigentia, ei nulla → et nulla indigentia, et nulla; perlicie → perficie.

Topics: Eschatology, Ethics

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Vera rel. 53 (PL 34:167; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-vera-religione/45/#p-53). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-vera-religione-53) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text of the Open Greek and Latin project); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.

Chapter 54

54PL 34:167–169

Qui ergo male utuntur tanto mentis bono, ut extra eam visibilia magis appetant, quibus ad conspi­ cienda et diligenda intelligibilia commemorari de­ buerunt, dabuntur eis exteriores tenebræ. Harum quippe initium est carnis prudentia, et sensuum cor­ poreorum imbecillitas. Et qui certaminibus delectan­ tur, alienabuntur a pace, et summis difficultatibus implicabuntur. Initium enim summæ difficultatis est bellum atque contentio. Et hoc significare arbitror, quod ligantur ei manus et pedes, id est, facilitas omnis aufertur operandi. Et qui sitire et esurire volunt, et in libidinem ardescere et defatigari, ut libenter edant, et bibant, et concumbant, et dormiant, amant indi­ gentiam, quod est initium summorum dolorum. Per­ ficietur ergo in eis quod amant, ut ibi sint ubi eis erit ploratus et stridor dentium. Plures enim sunt qui haec omnia simul vitia diligunt, et quorum vita est spectare, contendere, manducare, bibere, concumbere, dormire, et in cogi­ tatione sua nihil aliud quam phantasmata, quae de tali vita colligunt, amplexari; et ex eorum fallacia, super­ stitionis vel impietatis regulas figere, quibus decipiun­ tur, et quibus inhaerent, etiam si ab illecebris carnis se abstinere conentur. Quia non bene utuntur talento sibi commisso, id est mentis acie, qua videntur omnes, qui docti aut urbani aut faceti nominantur, excellere. Sed habent eam in sudario ligatam, aut in terra obru­ tam, id est delicatis et superfluis rebus, aut terrenis cupiditatibus involutam et oppressam. Ligabuntur ergo his manus et pedes, et mittentur in tenebras exteriores; ibi erit ploratus et stridor dentium. Non quia ipsa dilexerunt; (quis enim hæc diligat?) sed quia illa quae dilexerunt, initia sunt istorum, et necessario dilectores suos ad ista perducunt. Qui enim magis amant ire quam redire aut pervenire, in longinquiora mittendi sunt; quoniam caro sunt, et spiritus ambu­ lans et non revertens. Qui vero bene utitur vel ipsis quinque sensibus corporis ad credenda et prædicanda opera Dei, et nutriendam charitatem ipsius, vel actione vel cogni­ tione ad pacificandam naturam suam, et cognoscen­ dum Deum, intrat in gaudium Domini sui. Propterea talentum quod male utenti aufertur, illi datur qui ta­ lentis quinque bene usus est: non quia transferri potest acumen intel­ ligentæ, sed ita significatum est posse hoc amittere negligentes et impios ingeniosos, et ad eam pervenire diligentes et pios, quamvis ingenio tardiores. Non enim datum est illud talentum ei qui acceperat duo; habet enim et hoc, qui jam in actione et cognitione bene vivit: sed ei qui acceperat quinque. Nondum enim habet ad aeterna contemplanda idoneam mentis aciem, qui visibilibus tantum, id est temporalibus credit: sed habere potest, qui horum omnium sensi­ bilium Deum artificem laudat, et eum persuadet fide, et exspectat spe, et quærit charitate.

Those, then, who misuse so great a good of the mind as to desire visible things outside it, by which they ought to have been reminded to behold and love intelligible things, will be given the outer darkness. For the beginning of that darkness is the prudence of the flesh and the weakness of the bodily senses. And those who delight in contests will be estranged from peace and entangled in the greatest difficulties. For the beginning of the greatest difficulty is war and strife. And this, I think, is what is signified by their hands and feet being bound, that is, all ease of acting is taken away. And those who want to thirst and hunger, and to burn with lust and grow weary, so that they may eat and drink and lie together and sleep with pleasure, love want, which is the beginning of the greatest pains. So what they love will be perfected in them, so that they will be where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth. For there are many who love all these vices together, whose life is to watch shows, to contend, to eat, to drink, to lie together, to sleep, and in their thought to embrace nothing but the phantoms they gather from such a life; and from their deceit to fix rules of superstition or impiety, by which they are deceived and to which they cling, even if they try to abstain from the allurements of the flesh. For they do not make good use of the talent entrusted to them, that is, the keenness of the mind, in which all who are called learned or refined or witty seem to excel. But they keep it tied up in a napkin or buried in the earth, that is, wrapped up in delicate and superfluous things or pressed down by earthly desires. So their hands and feet will be bound, and they will be cast into the outer darkness; there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth. Not because they loved these things (for who would love them?), but because the things they loved are the beginnings of these, and necessarily lead their lovers to them. For those who love going out more than returning or arriving must be sent farther away, because they are “flesh, and a spirit that goes and does not return.” But he who makes good use even of the five senses of the body, for believing and proclaiming the works of God and nourishing love of him, or of action or knowledge for bringing peace to his own nature and knowing God, enters into the joy of his Lord. Therefore the talent that is taken from the one who uses it badly is given to him who has used five talents well: not because keenness of understanding can be transferred, but this signifies that the careless and the ungodly, though gifted, can lose it, and that the diligent and godly, though slower in gifts, can attain it. For that talent was not given to the one who had received two, for he who already lives well in action and knowledge has this too; but to the one who had received five. For he who believes only visible, that is, temporal things does not yet have the keenness of mind fit for contemplating the eternal; but he can have it who praises God as the maker of all these sensible things, and holds him by faith, awaits him in hope, and seeks him in love.

Matt 22:13 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 25:30 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 8:6 (allusion, medium confidence) · Matt 25:18 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 19:20 (allusion, high confidence) · Ps 78:39 (77:39 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 25:21 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 25:28 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Those who misuse the mind for visible things, contests, and bodily appetites are bound and cast into outer darkness, while those who use the senses and mind to know and love God enter the joy of their Lord, as the parable of the talents shows.

  • The section number 106 of the Maurist division is left in the digital text as “4Q6.” and removed. In the parable (Matt 25:14–30) the talent goes to the servant with ten talents, who had received five; Augustine reads the five talents as the five senses.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slip and stray mark; OCR slips; leaked section number): cicnda i et → cienda et; bucrunt → buerunt; Haruu → Harum; bit ploratus I et → erit ploratus et; baec omnia → haec omnia; dccipiun → decipiun; inbaerenl → inhaerent; cxcellere → excellere; ct spiritus → et spiritus; revertens. 4Q6. Qui → revertens. Qui; charitalem → charitatem; dutn Deum → dum Deum; irrpios → impios; qni acceperat → qui acceperat; eniin babet → enim habet.

Topics: Eschatology

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Vera rel. 54 (PL 34:167–169; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-vera-religione/45/#p-54). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-vera-religione-54) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text of the Open Greek and Latin project); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.