Hexameron 2.1–3.1

Latin text: CSEL 32.1 (Latin text: Schenkl/Petschenig, CSEL 32.1, digitized by Open Greek and Latin (csel-dev, University of Leipzig), CC BY-SA 4.0).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0).

Show

Chapter 2

2.1CSEL 32.1:41

DIES SECUNDUS. Diem primum uel potius unum — maneat enim ei prophetici praerogatiua sermonis — ut potuimus absoluimus. in quo conditum caelum, terram creatam, aquarum exundantiam, circumfusum aerem, discretionem factam lucis atque tenebrarum dei omnipotentis et domini Iesu Christi, sancti quoque spiritus operatione cognouimus. quis ergo non miretur dissimilibus membris disparem mundum in corpus unum adsurgere et insolubili concordiae caritatisque lege in societatem et coniunctionem sui tam distantia conuenire, ut quae discreta natura sunt in unitatis et pacis uinculum uelut indiuidua conpassione nectantur? aut quis haec uidens possibilitatem rationis infirmo ingenio rimetur? quae omnia uis diuina inconprehensibilis humanis mentibus et ineffabilis sermonibus nostris uoluntatis suae auctoritate contexuit.

The Second Day. The first day, or rather “one” day (for let it keep the prerogative of the prophetic word), we have finished as well as we could. In it we have learned that heaven was founded, the earth created, the waters overflowing, the air poured around, and the division of light and darkness made, by the operation of almighty God and the Lord Jesus Christ and of the Holy Spirit also. Who, then, would not marvel that a world unequal in its unlike members rises into one body, and that things so far apart come together by an indissoluble law of concord and love into fellowship and union with one another, so that what is separate by nature is bound into the bond of unity and peace as if by an undivided sympathy? Or who, seeing these things, would probe with weak wit the possibility of their reason? The divine power, incomprehensible to human minds and inexpressible in our words, has woven all these things together by the authority of its will.

Eph 4:3 (allusion, low confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Ambrose recalls the work of the first day, done by Father, Son, and Spirit, and marvels at the harmony of the world.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (Stray full stop in the digital text.; The digital text prints both the misprint and its correction.): indiniduaindiuidua → indiuidua; possibilit.atem → possibilitatem.

Extrabiblical texts: Basil, Hex. 3.1 (Homilies on the Hexaemeron; allusion)

Topics: Trinity, Creation

Cite (SBL): Ambrose, Hex. 2.1 (CSEL 32.1:41; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/ambrose-hexameron/2-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ambrose-hexameron-2-1) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin (Schenkl, CSEL 32.1); checked afterwards against FOTC 42 (private error-checking only).

2.2CSEL 32.1:41–42

fecit igitur deus caelum et terram et ea quasi auctor esse praecepit, non tamquam figurae inuentor, sed tamquam operator naturae. nam quomodo sibi conueniunt operatoria inpassibilis dei uirtus et passibilis materiae natura tamquam altera ab altera quo indiguerint mutuantes? nam si increata materia, uidetur ergo deo creandae potestas materiae defuisse et ab ea operationi subiacentia mutuatus: si uero inconposita, mirum admodum coaeternam deo materiem decorem sibi non potuisse conferre, quae substantiam non a creatore acceperit, sed sine tempore ipsa possederit. plus ergo inuenit operator omnium quam contulit: inuenit materiem, in qua posset operari, contulit autem figuram, quae decorem inuentis rebus adferret. unde excipiendus a ceteris tamquam dies unus, non conferendus cum ceteris tamquam dies primus est, quo fundamenta rerum omnium posita et causae esse coeperunt, quibus mundi huius atque uniuersae uisibilis creaturae fulta substantia est. quare ad secundi diei miranda opera sermo nobis prodeat, quorum eminentia non secundum tractatus nostri possibilitatem, sed secundum scripturam ad laudem referenda est creatoris. uos igitur quaeso ut naturaliter aestimare

God, then, made heaven and earth and commanded them to be as their author, not as one who devised a shape, but as the worker of nature. For how could the impassible working power of God and the passible nature of matter suit each other, as if each borrowed from the other what it lacked? For if matter is uncreated, then God seems to have lacked the power to create matter and to have borrowed from it what underlies his operation; and if it was unformed, it is quite remarkable that matter co-eternal with God could not give beauty to itself, though it did not receive its substance from a creator but possessed it without time. The worker of all things, then, found more than he contributed: he found matter on which he could work, and contributed the shape which would bring beauty to the things he found. That is why the day on which the foundations of all things were laid and the causes began to exist on which the substance of this world and of the whole visible creation rests, is to be set apart from the others as “one day,” not compared with the others as “the first day.” So let our discourse go on to the wonderful works of the second day, whose excellence is to be referred to the praise of the creator, not according to the capacity of our treatment but according to Scripture. I ask you, therefore, to be willing to judge what we say naturally,

Notes and citation

Summary: Uncreated matter would make God dependent on it; the first day is “one day,” the foundation of all the rest.

  • The sentence runs on into 2.3.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (Split word in the digital text.; Stray letter (a margin letter) in the digital text.; Stray mark in the digital text.): decorem sibi B non potuisse → decorem sibi non potuisse; acceperit,. sed → acceperit, sed; refe- renda → referenda.

Extrabiblical texts: Basil, Hex. 2.2 (Homilies on the Hexaemeron; allusion)

Topics: Creation

Cite (SBL): Ambrose, Hex. 2.2 (CSEL 32.1:41–42; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/ambrose-hexameron/2-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ambrose-hexameron-2-2) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin (Schenkl, CSEL 32.1); checked afterwards against FOTC 42 (private error-checking only).

2.3CSEL 32.1:42–43

quae dicimus probabiliter ac simplici mente et sedulo ingenio pensare dignemini, non secundum philosophiae traditiones et inanem seductionem suasoriae ueri similia colligentes, sed secundum regulam ueritatis, quae oraculis diuini sermonis exprimitur et contemplatione tantae maiestatis fidelium pectoribus infunditur, quia scriptum est: confirma me in uerbis tuis: narrauerunt mihi iniusti exercitationes, sed non sicut lex tua, domine. omnia praecepta tua ueritas. non ergo secundum elementorum naturas, sed secundum Christum, qui omnia quae uoluit fecit abundans plenitudine diuinitatis suae, consideremus quae facta sunt et naturae possibilitatem interrogemus. neque enim cum in euangelio leprosum curaret, caecis uisum refunderet, populus qui aderat et spectabat illa medicinae ordinem recognouit, sed potestatem domini miratus dedit, ut scriptum est, deo laudem. neque secundum numeros Aegyptiorum et concursus siderum et mensuras elementorum extendit manum suam Moyses, ut diuideretur mare rubrum, sed diuinae imperio potestatis obtemperans. unde et ipse ait: dextera manus tua, domine, glorificata est in uirtute, dextera manus tua, domine, confregit inimicos. illo igitur, sancta plebs, eleua mentem tuam et totum animum tuum eo confer. non sic deus uidet quemadmodum homo. deus in corde, homo in facie. nec sic igitur homo uidet quemadmodum deus. audis quia deus uidit et laudauit. noli igitur tuis oculis aestimare quae facta sunt opinionibusque colligere, farciuntur quae deus uidit et probauit ea tu retractanda non putes.

and to weigh it with a simple mind and diligent attention, not gathering likelihoods according to the traditions of philosophy and the empty seduction of persuasion, but according to the rule of truth, which is expressed in the oracles of the divine word and poured into the hearts of the faithful by the contemplation of so great a majesty; for it is written: “Strengthen me in your words. The unjust have told me their exercises, but not as your law, O Lord. All your commandments are truth.” Let us consider, then, what was made, not according to the natures of the elements, but according to Christ, who made all things he willed, abounding in the fullness of his divinity, and let us not question the capacity of nature. For when in the Gospel he healed the leper and poured sight back into the blind, the people who were present and watching did not recognize a course of medicine, but, marvelling at the Lord's power, gave praise to God, as it is written. Nor did Moses stretch out his hand according to the reckonings of the Egyptians, the conjunctions of the stars, and the measures of the elements, so that the Red Sea was divided, but in obedience to the command of the divine power. So he himself says: “Your right hand, O Lord, is glorified in power; your right hand, O Lord, has shattered the enemies.” To him, then, holy people, lift up your mind, and bring your whole soul to him. God does not see as man does: God sees the heart, man the face. So man does not see as God does. You hear that God saw and praised. Do not, then, judge what was made by your own eyes or gather it by opinions; do not think that what God saw and approved should be revised by you.

Ps 119:28 (118:28 LXX) (allusion, medium confidence) · Ps 119:85–86 (118:85-Ps LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Col 2:8–9 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 8:2–4 (allusion, medium confidence) · Luke 18:43 (allusion, high confidence) · Exod 14:21 (allusion, high confidence) · Exod 15:6 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Sam 16:7 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The works of creation must be judged by the rule of Scripture and the power of Christ, not by philosophy.

  • The intruded word “farciuntur” in the last sentence is passed over.

Topics: Scripture and canon, Miracles, Philosophy

Cite (SBL): Ambrose, Hex. 2.3 (CSEL 32.1:42–43; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/ambrose-hexameron/2-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ambrose-hexameron-2-3) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin (Schenkl, CSEL 32.1); checked afterwards against FOTC 42 (private error-checking only).

2.4CSEL 32.1:43–44

Et dixit deus: fiat firmamentum inter medium aquae et sit discernens inter aquam. et factum est sic. audi uerba dei: fiat dicit. iubentis est, non aestimantis, imperat naturae, non possibilitati obtemperat, non mensuras colligit, non pondus examinat. uoluntas eius mensura rerum est, sermo eius finis est operis. fiat inquit fauorum inter mediam aquam. firmum est omne quod statuit deus. et satis pulchre praemisit ferunt firmamentum antequam subiceret inter mediam aquam>, ut tu prius crederes firmamentum ex praecepto dei factum quam de aquarum proflua qualitate dubitares. si naturam elementorum consideres, quomodo inter aquas solidatum est firmamentum? illae profluunt, illud constringitur: illae currunt, hoc manet. et sit inquit discernens inter aquam. sed aqua confundere, non discernere solet. quomodo iubet quod scit secundum elementorum rationem esse contrarium? sed cum sermo eius ortus naturae sit, iure usurpat dare legem naturae qui originem dedit.

“And God said: Let there be a firmament in the midst of the water, and let it divide between water.” And so it was done. Hear the words of God: “Let there be,” he says. This belongs to one who commands, not to one who calculates; he gives orders to nature, he does not obey its capacity; he does not gather measures or examine weight. His will is the measure of things, his word is the completion of the work. “Let there be,” he says, “a firmament in the midst of the water.” Everything God sets up is firm. And quite fittingly he put “firmament” first, before adding “in the midst of the water,” so that you would believe the firmament was made by God's command before you could doubt because of the flowing nature of the waters. If you consider the nature of the elements, how was the firmament made solid between waters? They flow, it is held fast; they run, it remains. “And let it divide,” he says, “between water.” But water usually mingles, not divides. How does he command what he knows to be contrary to the nature of the elements? But since his word is the origin of nature, he who gave the origin rightly claims the right to give nature its law.

Gen 1:6–7 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: God's command “Let there be a firmament” overrides the nature of water; his word is the law of nature.

  • The intruded words “fauorum” and “ferunt” and some stray marks in the digital text are passed over.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (Stray marks in the digital text.): firmamentum\\ antequam → firmamentum antequam.

Extrabiblical texts: Basil, Hex. 3.2 (Homilies on the Hexaemeron; allusion)

Topics: Creation

Cite (SBL): Ambrose, Hex. 2.4 (CSEL 32.1:43–44; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/ambrose-hexameron/2-4). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ambrose-hexameron-2-4) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin (Schenkl, CSEL 32.1); checked afterwards against FOTC 42 (private error-checking only).

2.5CSEL 32.1:44–45

sed prius consideremus quid sit firmamentum, utrum ipsum sit quod in superioribus caelum appellauit an aliud et si duo caeli an plures. nam sunt qui unum caelum esse dicant nec alterius caeli faciendi, dum esset una flantibus, ut ipsi aiunt, potuisse subpetere substantiam, quoniam cum omnis superiori caelo esset expensa, nihil reliqui fuit quod ad aedificationem secundi caeli tertiiue proficeret. alii uero innumeros caelos et mundos esse adserunt, quos inrident sui — non enim nobiscum illis maior quam cum suis pugna est — qui geometricis numeris et necessitatibus contendunt probare quod aliud caelum esse non possit nec pati naturam, ut aut secundum aut tertium sit, nec operatoris uirtutem idoneam, ut multos caelos faceret. et quis non hanc eorum artificem facundiam inrideat, qui cum ex una atque eadem causa plura eiusdem generis ab hominibus fieri posse non abnuant, de creatore omnium dubitent, utrum plures caelos facere potuerit, de quo scriptum est: dominus autem caelos fecit et alibi: omnia quaecumque uoluit fecit. quid enim difficile ei cui uelle fecisse est? fluitat igitur illis inpossibilitatis ratio, cum de deo disputant, cui uere dicitur quia inpossibile nihil tibi est.

But first let us consider what the firmament is: whether it is the same as what he called heaven above, or something else, and whether there are two heavens or more. For there are some who say that there is one heaven, and that, since there was one substance, as they say, there could not be enough substance to make another heaven, because when all of it had been spent on the upper heaven, nothing was left that could serve to build a second or third heaven. Others again assert that there are innumerable heavens and worlds; and these are mocked by their own people (for their fight is not greater with us than with their own), who strive to prove by geometrical numbers and necessities that there can be no other heaven, and that nature does not allow a second or a third, nor is the power of the worker adequate to make many heavens. And who would not mock this artful eloquence of theirs? Though they do not deny that many things of the same kind can be made by men from one and the same cause, they doubt whether the creator of all could make several heavens, of whom it is written: “But the Lord made the heavens,” and elsewhere: “He has done whatever he willed.” What is difficult for him, for whom to will is to have done? Their reasoning from impossibility, then, wavers when they argue about God, to whom it is truly said: “Nothing is impossible for you.”

Ps 96:5 (95:5 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 115:3 (113:11 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Jer 32:17 (39:17 LXX) (allusion, medium confidence) · Luke 1:37 (allusion, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Against philosophers who deny that God could make more than one heaven, Scripture says God does whatever he wills.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (The digital text prints both the misprint and its correction.; The digital text prints both the reading and a misprint.): conteuduntcontendunt → contendunt; uoluitnoluit → uoluit.

Extrabiblical texts: Basil, Hex. 3.3 (Homilies on the Hexaemeron; allusion)

Topics: Creation, Philosophy

Cite (SBL): Ambrose, Hex. 2.5 (CSEL 32.1:44–45; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/ambrose-hexameron/2-5). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ambrose-hexameron-2-5) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin (Schenkl, CSEL 32.1); checked afterwards against FOTC 42 (private error-checking only).

2.6CSEL 32.1:45

itaque nos non solum secundum, sed tertium caelum esse negare non possumus, cum apostolus raptum se ad tertium caelum scriptorum suorum testificatione confirmet. Dauid etiam caelos caelorum in illo laudantium deum constituit choro. quem imitantes philosophi quinque stellarum et solis et lunae globorum consonum motum introduxerunt, quorum orbibus uel potius globis conexa memorant omnia. quos sibi innexos et uelut insertos uersari retro et contrario ceteris motu ferri arbitrantur eoque inpulsu et motu ipsorum orbium dulcem quendam et plenum suauitatis atque artis et gratissimi modulaminis sonum reddi, quoniam scissus aer tam artifici motu et acuta cum grauibus temperante ita uarios aequabiliter concentus efficiat, ut omnem supergrediatur musici carminis suauitatem.

We, then, cannot deny that there is not only a second but even a third heaven, since the apostle confirms by the testimony of his writings that he was caught up to the third heaven. David too placed the heavens of heavens in that choir of those praising God. Imitating him, the philosophers introduced the harmonious motion of the spheres of the five planets and of the sun and moon, to whose orbits, or rather spheres, they say all things are connected. These, linked and as it were set into one another, they think turn backward and are carried in a motion contrary to the rest; and by the impulse and motion of these orbits a sweet sound, full of delight, art, and most pleasing melody, is given forth, because the air, cut by so artful a motion, which tempers high notes with low, produces such varied harmonies evenly that it surpasses all the sweetness of musical song.

2 Cor 12:2 (allusion, high confidence) · Ps 148:4 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Scripture speaks of several heavens; the philosophers borrowed this and invented the music of the spheres.

  • The music of the spheres is the Pythagorean and Platonic theory (e.g. Cicero, Dream of Scipio).

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (The digital text prints both the misprint and its correction.): landantiumlaudantium → laudantium; uersanuersari → uersari.

Extrabiblical texts: Cicero, De re publica 6.18 (Cicero; allusion); Basil, Hex. 3.3 (Homilies on the Hexaemeron; allusion)

Topics: Creation, Philosophy

Cite (SBL): Ambrose, Hex. 2.6 (CSEL 32.1:45; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/ambrose-hexameron/2-6). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ambrose-hexameron-2-6) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin (Schenkl, CSEL 32.1); checked afterwards against FOTC 42 (private error-checking only).

2.7CSEL 32.1:45–46

huius rei fidem si requiras atque expetas sensu nobis et auditu probari, haesitant. formica si uera foret, quomodo tanto motu orbium concrepante, cum ille caelestis orbis, cui adfixos ferunt stellarum cursus, qui sine intermissione uoluuntur, concitatiorem habeat conuersionem atque acutum sonum excitet, hic autem lunaris grauissimum, non audiretur a nobis, cum leuiora audire soleamus? fidem ergo eius disputationis si testimonio nostro et auditus munere exigamus probari, referunt obsurduisse aures nostras et hebetiorem nobis sensum audiendi factum propter illam a principio nostrae generationis concepti sonitus consuetudinem et exemplum adferunt eo quod Nilus, fluuiorum maximus, eo uidelicet loci, ubi se ex altissimis montibus in catadupa illa praecipitat, magnitudine fragoris sui aures accolarum obstruat, ut audiendi munere carere dicantur. sed facile his ipsa respondet ueritas. nam qui tonitrua audimus nubium conlisione generata tantorum orbium conuersiones, qui maiore utique sicut motu ferri aestimantur, ita uehementiores sonitus excitarent, non audiremus? addunt praeterea ideo sonum hunc non peruenire ad terras, ne capti homines per suauitatem eius atque dulcedinem, quam celerrimus ille caelorum efficit motus, ab orientalibus partibus usque in occasum propria negotia atque opera derelinquerent et omnia hic otiosa remanerent quodam humanae ad caelestes sonos mentis excessu. sed ea quae sunt aliena ab studio nostro et a diuinae lectionis serie his qui foris sunt relinquamus: nos inhaereamus scripturarum caelestium magisterio.

If you ask for proof of this and demand that it be proved to us by sense and hearing, they hesitate. If it were true, how, when the motion of the spheres resounds so greatly (since that heavenly sphere to which they say the courses of the stars are fixed, turning without pause, has a swifter revolution and produces a high sound, while the lunar sphere produces the deepest), would it not be heard by us, when we usually hear fainter sounds? So if we demand that the truth of their argument be proved by our own testimony and by the gift of hearing, they reply that our ears have been deafened and our sense of hearing dulled by long familiarity with that sound, taken in from the beginning of our birth; and they bring the example of the Nile, the greatest of rivers, which, at the place where it hurls itself from the highest mountains down those cataracts, so stops the ears of those living nearby by the greatness of its roar that they are said to lack the gift of hearing. But truth itself easily answers them. For we who hear the thunder produced by the clash of clouds, would we not hear the revolutions of such great spheres, which, as they are thought to move with a greater motion, would surely produce more violent sounds? They add besides that this sound does not reach the earth so that people, captivated by the sweetness and delight which that very swift motion of the heavens from east to west produces, would not abandon their own business and work, and everything here would be left idle through a kind of transport of the human mind toward the heavenly sounds. But let us leave those things that are foreign to our study and to the course of the divine reading to those who are outside; let us hold fast to the teaching of the heavenly Scriptures.

Notes and citation

Summary: Ambrose refutes the music of the spheres: if it existed, we would hear it as we hear thunder.

  • The digital text's “formica” (“ant”) at the start of the second sentence stands for a conditional particle; translated by sense. The deafness explanation and the Nile cataracts are in Cicero, Dream of Scipio (De re publica 6.19).

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (Stray full stop in the digital text.; Stray mark in the digital text.): si uera. foret → si uera foret; relinquamus: -nos → relinquamus: nos.

Extrabiblical texts: Cicero, De re publica 6.19 (Cicero; allusion)

Topics: Philosophy

Cite (SBL): Ambrose, Hex. 2.7 (CSEL 32.1:45–46; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/ambrose-hexameron/2-7). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ambrose-hexameron-2-7) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin (Schenkl, CSEL 32.1); checked afterwards against FOTC 42 (private error-checking only).

2.8CSEL 32.1:46–47

Propositum igitur nobis est quia dixit deus: fiat firmamentum in medio aquae et sit discernens inter aquam et aquam. et hinc tractatur, utrum hoc firmamentum appellet, quod ante iam fecit, de quo scriptum est: in principio fecit deus caelum et terram. nec fallit quod aliqui ante nos ita acceperint, eo quod supra creatum auctore deo et conditum caelum scriptura expresserit, hic expositionem operis creationisque diffuderit, ut ibi quasi summa operis breuiter conprehensa sit, hic operationis qualitas per ipsas concurrentium rerum digesta sit species. sed mouet nos quia et nomen aliud significatur et species solidior et causa discernitur et persona cooperatoris adiungitur. sic enim scriptum est: et discreuit deus inter medium aquae, quae erat sub firmamento, et inter medium aquae, quae erat super firmamentum.

Our subject, then, is that God said: “Let there be a firmament in the midst of the water, and let it divide between water and water.” And here it is discussed whether he calls “firmament” what he had already made before, of which it is written: “In the beginning God made heaven and earth.” I am aware that some before us have taken it so, on the ground that Scripture stated above that heaven was created and founded by God as its author, and here unfolded the account of the work and the creation, so that there the sum of the work was briefly included, and here the character of the operation was set out through the very forms of the things coming together. But we are moved by the fact that another name is used, a more solid form is described, a cause is distinguished, and the person of a fellow worker is added. For so it is written: “And God divided between the middle of the water which was under the firmament and the middle of the water which was above the firmament.”

Gen 1:6 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 1:1 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 1:7 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Ambrose asks whether the firmament is the same as the heaven of Gen 1:1, and leans to its being distinct.

Extrabiblical texts: Basil, Hex. 3.3 (Homilies on the Hexaemeron; allusion)

Topics: Creation

Cite (SBL): Ambrose, Hex. 2.8 (CSEL 32.1:46–47; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/ambrose-hexameron/2-8). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ambrose-hexameron-2-8) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin (Schenkl, CSEL 32.1); checked afterwards against FOTC 42 (private error-checking only).

2.9CSEL 32.1:47–48

et primo uolunt id destruere quod frequenti scripturarum lectione inolitum nostris et inpressum est mentibus, quia aquae super caelos esse non possunt, dicentes rotundum esse orbem illum caeli, cuius in medio terra sit, et in illo circuitu aquam stare non posse, quod necesse est defluat et labatur, cum de superioribus ad inferiora decursus est. quomodo enim aqua super orbem stare ut aiunt potest, cum orbis ipse uoluatur? haec est illa uersutia dialecticae. da mihi unde tibi respondeam. quod si non detur, nullum uerbum refertur. petunt sibi concedi axem caeli torqueri motu concito, orbem autem terrae esse inmobilem, ut astruant aquas super caelos esse non posse, quod omnes eas uoluendo se axis effunderet, quasi uero, ut concedamus illis quod postulant et secundum eorum opiniones illis respondeam, negare possint in illa altitudine et profundo uel longitudinem esse et latitudinem, quam nemo potest conprehendere nisi is qui inpletur in omnem plenitudinem dei, ut apostolus ait. quis enim facile poterit esse diuini operis aestimator? est ergo latitudo in ipsa caeli altitudine. sunt etiam, ut de his dicamus quae scire possumus, pleraque aedificia foris rotunda, intus quadrata et foris quadrata, intus rotunda, quibus superiora plana sunt, in quibus aqua haerere soleat. quae tamen ideo dicimus, ut aduertant opiniones suas opinionibus ueri similioribus reuinci posse et desinant tantum opus dei humanae operationis et nostrae possibilitatis contemplatione metiri.

And first they want to destroy what has been rooted and impressed in our minds by frequent reading of the Scriptures, that there are waters above the heavens. They say that the sphere of heaven is round, with the earth in its middle, and that water cannot stand on that curved surface, because it must flow down and slip away, since its course is from higher to lower. For how, they say, can water stand on a sphere when the sphere itself revolves? This is the familiar trickery of dialectic: “Grant me something from which I may answer you; if it is not granted, no word is returned.” They ask to be granted that the axis of heaven turns with a swift motion, while the globe of the earth is unmoved, so as to maintain that waters cannot be above the heavens, because the axis would pour them all off as it revolves. As if, granting them what they ask and answering them according to their own opinions, they could deny that in that height and depth there is both length and breadth, which no one can grasp except him who is filled unto all the fullness of God, as the apostle says. For who could easily be a judge of the divine work? There is, then, breadth in the very height of heaven. There are also, to speak of things we can know, many buildings that are round outside and square inside, or square outside and round inside, whose tops are flat, on which water usually lies. We say this so that they may notice that their opinions can be overcome by opinions more likely than theirs, and stop measuring so great a work of God by consideration of human work and our capacity.

Eph 3:18–19 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Against the claim that water could not stay on a revolving heavenly sphere, Ambrose argues the heaven may have flat surfaces.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip.; Stray full stop in the digital text.): conprebendere → conprehendere; inpletur in. omnem → inpletur in omnem.

Extrabiblical texts: Basil, Hex. 3.4 (Homilies on the Hexaemeron; allusion)

Topics: Creation

Cite (SBL): Ambrose, Hex. 2.9 (CSEL 32.1:47–48; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/ambrose-hexameron/2-9). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ambrose-hexameron-2-9) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin (Schenkl, CSEL 32.1); checked afterwards against FOTC 42 (private error-checking only).

2.10CSEL 32.1:48–49

nos autem scripturarum seriem atque ordinem sequimur et opus contemplatione aestimamus auctoris, quid dictum sit et quis dixerit et cui foueri. fiat inquit firmamentum in medio aquae et sit discernens inter aquas. audio firmamentum fieri praecepto, quo diuideretur aqua et ab inferiore superior discerneretur. quid hoc manifestius? qui iussit discerni aquam interiecto et medio firmamento prouidit quemadmodum diuisa atque discreta manere possit. sermo dei uirtus naturae est et diuturnitas substantiae, quoad uelit eam manere qui statuit, sicut scriptum est: statuit ea in saeculum et in saeculum saeculi; praeceptum posuit, et non praeteribit. et ut scias quia de istis aquis hoc dixit, quas tu negas posse in superioribus caeli esse, audi superiora: laudate eum caeli caelorum et aquae, quae super caelos sunt, laudent nomen domini. nonne quasi aduersanti tibi dixit: quoniam ipse dixit et facta sunt, ipse mandauit et creata sunt: statuit ea in saeculum et in saeculum saeculi; praeceptum posuit, et non praeteribit. an non uidetur tibi auctor idoneus, qui legem suo operi daret? deus est qui dicit, uenerabilis naturae, inaestimabilis magnitudine, inmensus in remunerationibus, inconprehensibilis in operibus eius, cuius altitudinem sapientiae quis inuestigare facilis? sed dicit filio id est brachio suo, dicit uirtuti suae, dicit sapientiae suae, dicit iustitiae. et facit filius quasi potens, facit quasi uirtus dei, facit quasi sapientia dei, facit quasi iustitia diuina. cum haec audis, quid miraris si supra firmamentum caeli potuit tantae maiestatis operatione unda suspendi?

We, however, follow the course and order of the Scriptures and judge the work by considering its author: what was said, and who said it, and to whom. “Let there be,” he says, “a firmament in the midst of the water, and let it divide between waters.” I hear that a firmament was made by command, by which the water was divided and the upper separated from the lower. What is plainer than this? He who ordered the water to be divided by the firmament set between and in the middle foresaw how it could remain divided and separated. The word of God is the power of nature and the permanence of its substance, as long as he who established it wills it to remain, as it is written: “He established them for ever and for ever and ever; he set a command, and it shall not pass away.” And so that you may know that he said this of those waters which you deny can be in the upper parts of heaven, hear what comes before: “Praise him, you heavens of heavens, and let the waters that are above the heavens praise the name of the Lord.” Did he not say, as if to you who oppose him: “For he spoke and they were made, he commanded and they were created; he established them for ever and for ever and ever; he set a command, and it shall not pass away”? Or does he not seem to you an adequate author to give a law to his own work? It is God who speaks, of venerable nature, inestimable in greatness, immeasurable in rewards, incomprehensible in his works; who can easily search out the height of his wisdom? But he speaks to the Son, that is, to his arm; he speaks to his power, to his wisdom, to his justice. And the Son does it as the mighty one, does it as the power of God, does it as the wisdom of God, does it as divine justice. When you hear these things, why do you wonder if by the working of so great a majesty water could be suspended above the firmament of heaven?

Gen 1:6 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 148:4–6 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 11:33 (allusion, medium confidence) · 1 Cor 1:24 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 1:30 (allusion, medium confidence) · Isa 53:1 (allusion, low confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Ps 148 confirms waters above the heavens; God's command, carried out by the Son, keeps them there.

  • “To whom” renders the sense where the digital text has “foueri”.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (The digital text prints both the misprints and their corrections.): iiatfiat mquitinquit tirmamentumfirmamentum → fiat inquit firmamentum.

Extrabiblical texts: Basil, Hex. 3.5 (Homilies on the Hexaemeron; allusion)

Topics: Christology, Creation

Cite (SBL): Ambrose, Hex. 2.10 (CSEL 32.1:48–49; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/ambrose-hexameron/2-10). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ambrose-hexameron-2-10) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin (Schenkl, CSEL 32.1); checked afterwards against FOTC 42 (private error-checking only).

2.11CSEL 32.1:49–50

De aliis haec colligite, de his quae uidentur oculis hominum, quomodo ad Iudaeorum transitum, si rationem quaeris, se unda diuiserit. non solet hoc esse naturae, ut aqua se discernat ab aqua et in profundo interfusiones aquarum terrae medio separentur. gelauerunt inquit fluctus et firmamenti specie cursum suum insolito fine frenarunt. nonne potuit etiam aliter Hebraeum populum liberare? sed tibi uoluit ostendere, ut eo spectaculo etiam illa quae non uidisti aestimares esse credenda. Iordanes quoque reflexo amne in suum fontem uertit. haerere aquam, cum labitur, inusitatum, redire in superiora sine ullo repagulo inpossibile habetur: sed quid inpossibile ei qui dedit posse infirmis, ut infirmus dicat: omnia possum in eo qui me confortat. dicant certe quemadmodum aer cogatur in nubem, utrum pluuia nubibus generetur an sinu nubium colligatur. uidemus plerumque exire nubes de montibus. quaero utrum de terris ascendat aqua an ea quae super caelos est largo imbre descendat. si ascendit, utique contra naturam est, ut ascendat in superiora quae grauior est et portetur aere, cum aer subtilior sit. aut si conciti orbis totius motu rapitur aqua, sicut imo orbe rapitur ita summo orbe diffunditur. si fundi, ut uolunt, non desinit, utique non desinit rapi, quia si axis caeli semper mouetur, et aqua semper hauritur. si descendit, manet ergo iugiter supra caelos, quae habet unde descendat. deinde quid obstat, si confiteantur quia aqua super caelos suspensa sit? nam quo uerbo dicunt terram in medio esse suspensam et immobilem manere, cum utique grauior sit quam aqua? ea ratione possunt dicere non praecipitari aquam orbis illius caelestis conuersione, quae super caelos est. sicut enim terra <in> inani suspenditur uel pondere librato undique immobilis perseuerat, ita et aqua aut grauioribus aut aequis cum terra ponderibus examinatur. ideoque non facile superfunditur mare terris, nisi cum iubetur exire.

Gather these things from others, from those that are seen by human eyes: how the wave divided itself for the crossing of the Jews, if you ask for a reason. It is not usual in nature for water to separate itself from water, and for the waters poured into the depth to be parted by earth in the middle. “The waves,” he says, “froze,” and in the likeness of a firmament reined in their course with an unwonted limit. Could he not have freed the Hebrew people in another way? But he wished to show you, so that by that spectacle you would judge that even what you have not seen is to be believed. The Jordan too turned back its stream toward its source. For water to stop as it flows is unusual, to go back uphill without any barrier is held impossible; but what is impossible for him who gave power to the weak, so that the weak man says: “I can do all things in him who strengthens me”? Let them say, at any rate, how air is compressed into cloud, whether rain is generated by the clouds or gathered in the bosom of the clouds. We often see clouds come out of the mountains. I ask whether water rises from the earth or whether the water that is above the heavens comes down in abundant rain. If it rises, it is surely against nature that water, which is heavier, should rise to the higher regions and be carried by air, since air is finer. Or if water is snatched up by the motion of the whole sphere as it spins, then as it is snatched up at the bottom of the sphere, so it is poured out at the top. If, as they would have it, it does not cease to be poured out, it surely does not cease to be snatched up, because if the axis of heaven always moves, the water too is always drawn up. If it comes down, then it remains continually above the heavens, since it has a place from which to come down. Then what is the obstacle to their admitting that water is suspended above the heavens? For by what word do they say that the earth is suspended in the middle and remains unmoved, though it is certainly heavier than water? By the same reasoning they can say that the water above the heavens is not hurled down by the revolution of that heavenly sphere. For as the earth is suspended in the void, or remains unmoved by its weight balanced on all sides, so the water too is held in balance by weights either heavier than or equal to the earth's. That is why the sea does not easily pour over the lands, unless it is ordered to go out.

Exod 14:21–22 (allusion, high confidence) · Exod 15:8 (quotation, high confidence) · Josh 3:13–16 (allusion, high confidence) · Ps 114:3 (113:3 LXX) (allusion, medium confidence) · Phil 4:13 (quotation, high confidence) · Amos 9:6 (allusion, low confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The parting of the Red Sea and the Jordan show God's power over water; even the philosophers' physics allows waters above the heavens.

Extrabiblical texts: Basil, Hex. 3.5 (Homilies on the Hexaemeron; allusion)

Topics: Miracles

Cite (SBL): Ambrose, Hex. 2.11 (CSEL 32.1:49–50; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/ambrose-hexameron/2-11). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ambrose-hexameron-2-11) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin (Schenkl, CSEL 32.1); checked afterwards against FOTC 42 (private error-checking only).

2.12CSEL 32.1:50–52

deinde cum ipsi dicant uolui orbem caeli stellis ardentibus refulgentem, nonne diuina prouidentia necessario prospexit, ut intra orbem caeli et supra orbem redundaret aqua, quae illa feruentis axis incendia temperaret? propterea quia exundat ignis et feruet, etiam aqua exundauit in terris, ne eas surgentis solis et stellarum micantium ardor exureret et tenera rerum exordia insolitus uapor laederet. quanti fontes fluuii lacus inrigant terras, quia eas internus quidam ignis uaporat! unde enim aut arbores germinarent aut frumenta uel sata prorumperent uel orta coquerentur, nisi ea interior quoque ignis animaret? qui etiam de saxis frequenter excutitur et de ipso saepe, dum caeditur, ligno exilit. ergo sicut necessaria ignis creatura, ut ordinata et disposita permaneant caelique clementia temperet aquarum rigorem, ita etiam aquarum redundantia non superflua, ne alterum altero consumeretur, quia nisi conueniens utriusque mensura sit, sicut ignis aquam exsiccat ita et aqua restinguit ignem. ideoque pondere et mensura examinauit uniuersa; numerata enim sunt ei et stilicidia pluuiarum, sicut in libro Iob legimus. sciens uel rerum facilem defectum fore uel solutionem uniuersitatis, si alterum exsuperaretur altero, ita utriusque temperauit dispendia, ut neque plus ignis exquoqueret neque exuberaret aqua quam inminutio fieret utriusque moderata, quae et superfluum detraheret et necessarium reseruaret. itaque cum tanta de terris erumpant maximorum fluenta amnium, Nilus effuso Aegyptum stagnans flumine, Danubius de occidentalibus partibus barbarum atque Romanorum intersecans populos, donec ponto ipse condatur, Renus de iugo Alpium usque in oceani profunda cursus suos dirigens, Romani memorandus aduersus feras gentes murus imperii, Padus maritimorum commeatuum Italicis subsidiis fidus inuector: Rodanus rapido concitus cursu Tyrreni aequoris freta scindit, in quo non mediocre fertur nauigantum periculum, dum inter se maris fluctus et amnis fluenta decernunt, itemque de septentrionali parte Phasis Caucaseis montibus fusus cum pluribus aliis in Euxinum se praecipitat mare — prolixum est singulorum persequi fluuiorum nomina, qui uel in nostrum mare deriuantur uel exinaniuntur oceano —, cum tanta igitur ubertas aquarum sit, tamen plerumque terra meridianae plagae torretur ardoribus atque aestu soluta fatiscit in puluerem miserandi agricolae labore consumpto, ut frequenter ad potum siccatis puteis arido gurgite subsidium uitale deficiat. et erit quidem quando dicat abysso: deserta eris, et omnes fluuios siccabo, sicut per Esaiam futurum adnuntiauit. sed etiam antequam ille dies adueniat diuino praestitutus arbitrio, non minimum inter se ipsa elementorum natura decernit. crebro itaque aut inundationibus mundus inclementiam quatitur aut nimio aestu et ariditate uexatur.

Then, since they themselves say that the sphere of heaven revolves, shining with burning stars, did not divine providence necessarily take care that water should abound within the sphere of heaven and above it, to temper the fires of that blazing axis? For this reason, because fire abounds and blazes, water too abounded on the earth, so that the heat of the rising sun and of the twinkling stars would not burn it up and an unwonted heat harm the tender beginnings of things. How many springs, rivers, and lakes water the lands, because a kind of inner fire heats them! For how would trees sprout, or grain and crops break forth, or what has sprung up ripen, unless an inner fire also quickened them? This fire is often struck from rocks, and often leaps out of wood itself when it is cut. So, as the creature fire is necessary, so that things may remain ordered and arranged, and the mildness of heaven may temper the coldness of the waters, so also the abundance of waters is not superfluous, so that one would not be consumed by the other; for unless the measure of each is suitable, as fire dries up water so water puts out fire. That is why he weighed all things by weight and measure; for even the drops of rain are numbered by him, as we read in the book of Job. Knowing that there would be either an easy failing of things or a dissolving of the universe if one were overcome by the other, he so tempered the losses of each that neither fire would scorch too much nor water overflow, but a moderated diminishing of each would take place, which would remove the excess and preserve what is necessary. So, though such streams of the greatest rivers break forth from the earth (the Nile flooding Egypt with its outpoured stream; the Danube from the western regions cutting between the barbarian peoples and the Romans until it is buried in the Black Sea; the Rhine directing its courses from the ridge of the Alps to the depths of the ocean, a memorable wall of the Roman empire against wild nations; the Po, faithful carrier of sea-borne supplies for the support of Italy; the Rhone, driven by a swift course, cuts the straits of the Tyrrhenian sea, where no small danger is said to face sailors while the waves of the sea and the streams of the river fight with each other; and likewise from the north the Phasis, pouring from the Caucasus mountains, with many others hurls itself into the Black Sea; it would take long to list the names of each river that flows into our sea or empties into the ocean), though, then, there is such an abundance of waters, still the land of the southern region is often scorched by heat and, loosened by the burning, crumbles into dust, the labour of the wretched farmer wasted, so that often, when the wells are dried up and the pools parched, the life-giving supply of drink fails. And there will indeed be a time when he will say to the abyss: “You shall be desolate, and I will dry up all the rivers,” as he announced through Isaiah would be. But even before that day comes, fixed by the divine decision, the nature of the elements fights no little among itself. So the world is often shaken by the harshness of floods or troubled by excessive heat and drought.

Job 36:27 (allusion, medium confidence) · Isa 44:27 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 42:15 (allusion, low confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: God set water above and within the world to balance the heat of fire; the great rivers show this balance, which will one day end.

  • Ambrose's list of rivers expands Basil's (Hexaemeron 3.6) with western rivers (Danube, Rhine, Po, Rhone).

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (The digital text prints both the misprint and its correction.): exeutiturexcutitur → excutitur; superfiuasuperflua → superflua; uninersauniuersa → uniuersa.

Extrabiblical texts: Wis 11:20 (Wisdom of Solomon [in RC, EO, ETH canons]; allusion); Sir 1:2 (Sirach [in RC, EO, ETH canons]; allusion); Basil, Hex. 3.5 (Homilies on the Hexaemeron; allusion); Basil, Hex. 3.6 (Homilies on the Hexaemeron; allusion)

Topics: Creation, Providence

Cite (SBL): Ambrose, Hex. 2.12 (CSEL 32.1:50–52; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/ambrose-hexameron/2-12). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ambrose-hexameron-2-12) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin (Schenkl, CSEL 32.1); checked afterwards against FOTC 42 (private error-checking only).

2.13CSEL 32.1:52–53

Noli igitur incredibilem opinari aquarum multitudinem, sed respice ad uim caloris et incredulus non eris. multum est quod ignis absorbet quod uel ex illo nobis debet esse manifestum, cum medici uasa quaedam angusta ore, planiora desuper, intus concaua, leui lucernae concepto lumine adfigunt corpori, quemadmodum calor ille omnem in se rapiat umorem? quis igitur dubitet quod ignitus aether et magno feruens uapore inflammaret atque exureret omnia, nisi lege quadam sui cohiberetur auctoris, ut nec flumina nec lacus nec ipsa maria uim eius possent restinguere? et ideo desuper aqua inpetu quodam descendens in tantos plerumque imbres rumpitur, ut flumina < ac > lacus repente repleantur, ipsa maria exundent. unde frequenter et solem uidemus madidum atque rorantem.

Do not, then, think the multitude of waters incredible, but look at the force of heat, and you will not be unbelieving. Fire absorbs a great deal, as must be plain to us from this at least: when physicians fasten to the body certain vessels with narrow mouths, flat on top and hollow inside, after lighting a little lamp-flame in them, how that heat draws all the moisture into itself! Who then would doubt that the fiery ether, blazing with great heat, would set everything on fire and burn it up, unless it were restrained by a certain law of its author, so that neither rivers nor lakes nor the seas themselves could quench its force? And so the water from above, coming down with a kind of rush, often bursts into such great rains that rivers and lakes are suddenly filled and the seas themselves overflow. That is why we often see even the sun moist and dewy.

Notes and citation

Summary: Fire consumes much moisture, as cupping vessels show, so a great store of water is needed to temper the heavenly fire.

Extrabiblical texts: Basil, Hex. 3.7 (Homilies on the Hexaemeron; allusion)

Topics: Creation

Cite (SBL): Ambrose, Hex. 2.13 (CSEL 32.1:52–53; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/ambrose-hexameron/2-13). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ambrose-hexameron-2-13) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin (Schenkl, CSEL 32.1); checked afterwards against FOTC 42 (private error-checking only).

2.14CSEL 32.1:53–54

in quo euidens dat indicium, quod elementum sibi aquarum ad temperiem sui sumpserit. tantum autem inest illis inpugnandae ueritatis studium, ut solem ipsum negent calidae naturae esse, eo quod albus sit et non rubicundus aut rutilus in speciem ignis. et ideo aiunt quod nec ignitus natura sit et si quid habet caloris, ferunt ex nimio motu conuersionis accidere. quod ideo dicendum putant, ut nihil uideatur umoris consumere, quia calorem, quo umor uel minuitur uel plerumque exhauritur, non habet naturalem. sed nihil agunt, cum ista componunt, quia nihil interest utrum ex natura calorem quis habeat an ex passione aliquaue ex causa, quia ignis omnis consumptor umoris est uel huiusmodi materiae, quam flamma consueuit exurere. nam siue ex lignis hautquaquam semiustulatis, sed inter se inflexerit ignis excussus excipiatur foliis, etiam flamma adolet, ac si de igne accendas facem, siue de flammae lumine lumen accendas, eadem species et natura est luminis, ac si illud non naturalis ignis adoleuerit, sed accidens causa generauerit. uel hinc saltem contemplentur solis calorem, quod diuersa ei deus constituit cursus sui loca et tempora, ne, si semper in isdem moraretur locis, cottidiano ea uapore exureret. mare ipsum ideo ferunt ipsi salsam atque amaram aquam habere, quod ea quae fluuiis in freta influat calore absumatur, tantumque uapore diurno consumi quantum cottidie ex diuersis fluuiorum cursibus inuehatur. quod ex solis quadam diiudicatione fieri perhibetur, qui quod purum ac leue est sibi rapit, quod graue atque terrenum relinquit, ex quo remanet salsum illud atque aridum, quod sine usu et suauitate potandi sit.

In this it gives clear evidence that it has taken to itself the element of water to temper itself. But they have so great a zeal for attacking the truth that they deny that the sun itself is hot by nature, because it is white and not red or glowing in the appearance of fire. So they say that it is not fiery by nature, and that if it has any heat, it comes from the excessive motion of its revolution. They think they must say this so that it may not seem to consume any moisture, since it does not have by nature the heat by which moisture is diminished or often drained. But they achieve nothing in contriving this, because it makes no difference whether one has heat by nature or from some affection or other cause, since all fire consumes moisture, or matter of the kind that flame usually burns. For whether fire struck from pieces of wood rubbed together is caught on leaves, flame still kindles, as if you lit a torch from a fire; or whether you light a light from the light of a flame, the form and nature of the light is the same, even if it was not natural fire that kindled it but an accidental cause produced it. Let them at least consider the sun's heat from this: God appointed different places and times for its course, so that if it always stayed in the same places, it would not burn them up with daily heat. They themselves say that the sea has salty and bitter water because the water that flows into it from the rivers is absorbed by heat, and as much is consumed by the daily heat as is brought in each day by the various courses of the rivers. This is said to happen by a kind of sifting of the sun, which snatches to itself what is pure and light and leaves what is heavy and earthy, from which that salty and dry part remains, which is useless and unpleasant to drink.

Notes and citation

Summary: Against those who deny the sun is hot, Ambrose argues that any fire consumes moisture, as the saltiness of the sea shows.

  • The digital text is disturbed in the example of fire struck from wood (“hautquaquam semiustulatis, sed inter se inflexerit”); translated by sense.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (Stray capital in the digital text.): Quod ea quae fluuiis → quod ea quae fluuiis.

Extrabiblical texts: Basil, Hex. 3.7 (Homilies on the Hexaemeron; allusion)

Cite (SBL): Ambrose, Hex. 2.14 (CSEL 32.1:53–54; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/ambrose-hexameron/2-14). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ambrose-hexameron-2-14) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin (Schenkl, CSEL 32.1); checked afterwards against FOTC 42 (private error-checking only).

2.15CSEL 32.1:54–55

Sed reuertamur ad propositum. fiat firmamentum inter medium aquae. non moueat, sicut iam dixi, quia supra caelum ait, hic dicit firmamentum, quoniam et Dauid ait: caeli enarrant gloriam dei, et opera manuum eius adnuntiat firmamentum, hoc est: mundi opus, cum uidetur, suum laudat auctorem; inuisibilis enim maiestas eius per ea quae uidentur agnoscitur. et uidetur mihi nomen caelorum commune esse, quia plurimos caelos scriptura testificatur, nomen autem esse speciale firmamentum, siquidem et hic ita habet: et uocauit firmamentum caelum, ut uideatur supra generaliter dixisse in principio caelum factum, ut omnem caelestis creaturae fabricam conprehenderet, hic autem specialem firmamenti huius exterioris soliditatem, quod dicitur caeli firmamentum, sicut legimus in hymno prophetico: benedictus es in firmamento caeli. nam caelum, quod οὺρανός graece dicitur, latine, quia inpressa stellarum lumina uelut signa habeat, tamquam caelatum appellatur, sicut argentum, quod signis eminentibus refulget, caelatum dicimus, οὐρανός autem inminutionem too opaasat dicitur, quod uidetur. zpo; ἀντιδιαστολήν igitur terrae, quae obscurior est, copav6? nuncupatur, quia lucidus est, tamquam uisibilis. unde puto et illud dictum uolatilia caeli semper uident faciem patris mei, qui in caelis est et uolatilia circa firmamentum caeli, eo quod potestates, quae sunt in illo uisibili loco, spectent haec omnia et subiecta suis habeant conspectibus.

But let us return to our subject. “Let there be a firmament in the midst of the water.” Let it not disturb you, as I have already said, that above he says “heaven” and here “firmament,” since David too says: “The heavens tell the glory of God, and the firmament announces the work of his hands,” that is, the work of the world, when it is seen, praises its author; for his invisible majesty is known through the things that are seen. And it seems to me that “heaven” is a common name, since Scripture testifies to many heavens, while “firmament” is a particular name; for here too it says: “And he called the firmament heaven,” so that he seems above to have said generally that heaven was made in the beginning, to include the whole structure of the heavenly creation, but here the particular solidity of this outer firmament, which is called the firmament of heaven, as we read in the prophetic hymn: “Blessed are you in the firmament of heaven.” For heaven, which is called ouranos in Greek, is in Latin called caelum, as if caelatum (“engraved”), because it has the lights of the stars set in it like figures, just as we call silver caelatum when it shines with raised figures. But ouranos is so called from horasthai, because it is seen; in contrast to the earth, which is darker, it is named ouranos because it is bright, as being visible. So I think this too was said: “The birds of heaven always see the face of my Father who is in heaven,” and “birds about the firmament of heaven,” because the powers that are in that visible place watch all these things and have them under their sight.

Gen 1:6 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 19:1 (18:2 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 1:20 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 1:8 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 1:1 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 18:10 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 1:20 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: “Heaven” is the general name and “firmament” the particular; Ambrose explains the Latin and Greek words for heaven.

  • The Greek words (οὐρανός, ὁρᾶσθαι, ἀντιδιαστολήν) are garbled in the digital text and are translated by sense. “Blessed are you in the firmament of heaven” is from the Song of the Three Young Men (Dan 3:56 in the Greek and Latin Bibles). The saying about the birds of heaven seeing the Father's face adapts Matt 18:10 (“their angels”), as in the text.

Extrabiblical texts: Pr Azar 56 (Prayer of Azariah and Song of the Three Young Men [in RC, EO, ETH canons]; quotation); Basil, Hex. 3.8 (Homilies on the Hexaemeron; allusion)

Topics: Creation

Cite (SBL): Ambrose, Hex. 2.15 (CSEL 32.1:54–55; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/ambrose-hexameron/2-15). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ambrose-hexameron-2-15) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin (Schenkl, CSEL 32.1); checked afterwards against FOTC 42 (private error-checking only).

2.16CSEL 32.1:55–56

denique clausum caelum dictum est temporibus Heliae, quando in Achab et Iezabel perfidia regnabat, cum populus regali sacrilegio deseruiret, eo quod nemo ad caelum oculos erigebat, nemo eius auctorem uenerabatur, sed ligna et lapides adorabant. unde hoc colligimus? quia et in maledictionibus populi Istrahel dixit deus: erit tibi caelum super caput tuum aereum et terra tua ferrea, quando pretium perfidiae luens populus Iudaeorum intemperie caeli et terrae infecunditate multatur; de caelo enim causa fertilitatis. denique et Moyses id benedictionibus tribui Ioseph a finibus caeli et rore abyssi fontium deorsum et secundum horam a solis cursu et a conuenientibus mensibus et a uertice montium et collium aeternorum dedit, eo quod moderatione caelesti terrarum fecunditas nutriatur. ferreum ergo caelum, quod nullum exundat umorem, quando nullus nubibus imber rumpitur. est etiam ferreum caelum subobscurus aer pressus atque nebulosus colore ferrugineo, quando rigore frigoris stringitur terra. tunc ueluti super caput nostrum umor suspensus uidetur et per momenta inminere. plerumque etiam glacialibus uentorum flatibus rigentes aquae solidantur in niuem et rupto aere nix funditur. neque enim firmamentum hoc potest sine aliquo rumpi fragore. ideo et firmamentum dicitur, quod non sit inualidum nec remissum. unde et de tonitribus, quae concepto intra sinum nubium spiritu, cum se uehementer erupturus inliserit, magno concrepant sonitu, ait scriptura: firmans tonitru. a firmitate ergo firmamentum est nuncupatum uel quod diuina uirtute firmatum sit, sicut et scriptura nos docet dicens: laudate eum in firmamento uirtutis eius.

So, too, heaven was said to be shut in the time of Elijah, when unbelief reigned in Ahab and Jezebel and the people served the king's sacrilege, because no one lifted his eyes to heaven, no one honoured its author, but they worshipped wood and stones. From where do we gather this? Because in the curses on the people of Israel God said: “The heaven over your head shall be bronze to you, and your earth iron,” when the Jewish people, paying the price of unbelief, is punished by harsh weather from heaven and barrenness of the earth; for from heaven comes the cause of fertility. Moses too gave this in the blessings to Joseph: “from the bounds of heaven and from the dew of the abyss of springs below, and according to the season, from the course of the sun, and from the fitting months, and from the top of the mountains and of the everlasting hills,” because the fruitfulness of the lands is nourished by the moderation of heaven. Heaven, then, is iron when it pours out no moisture, when no rain bursts from the clouds. Heaven is also iron when the air is darkish, heavy and cloudy, of the colour of rust, when the earth is bound by the rigour of cold. Then moisture seems to hang as it were over our head and to threaten at every moment. Often, too, the waters, stiffened by icy blasts of wind, are solidified into snow, and when the air bursts, snow is poured out. For this firmament cannot burst without some crash. So it is called “firmament” because it is not weak or slack. Thus Scripture says of thunder, which, when the wind is caught in the bosom of the clouds and dashes violently to break out, crashes with a great sound: “making the thunder firm.” The firmament, then, is named from firmness, or because it was made firm by divine power, as Scripture also teaches us, saying: “Praise him in the firmament of his power.”

1 Kgs 17:1 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Kgs 18:1 (allusion, medium confidence) · Luke 4:25 (allusion, medium confidence) · Deut 28:23 (quotation, high confidence) · Deut 33:13–15 (quotation, high confidence) · Amos 4:13 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 150:1 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Scriptural uses of “heaven” shut or iron illustrate the firmament, named for its firmness.

  • “Making the thunder firm” is the Latin of Amos 4:13 (“firmans tonitruum”).

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (Joined words and OCR slip in the digital text.): etlezabel → et Iezabel.

Extrabiblical texts: Basil, Hex. 3.7 (Homilies on the Hexaemeron; allusion)

Cite (SBL): Ambrose, Hex. 2.16 (CSEL 32.1:55–56; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/ambrose-hexameron/2-16). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ambrose-hexameron-2-16) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin (Schenkl, CSEL 32.1); checked afterwards against FOTC 42 (private error-checking only).

2.17CSEL 32.1:56–57

nec praeterit rettulisse aliquos caelos caelorum ad intellegibiles uirtutes, firmamentum ad operatorias. et ideo laudare caelos uel enarrare gloriam dei, annuntiare firmamentum, sed non quasi spiritalia, sed quasi opera mundi enarrant, quemadmodum supra diximus. alii quoque purificatorias uirtutes interpretati sunt aquas, quae super caelos sunt. accipimus haec quasi ad tractatus decorem, nobis tamen non alienum uidetur atque absurdum, si aquas ueras propter illam causam quam diximus intellegamus. nam et ros et gelus et frigus et aestus secundum hymnum propheticum benedicunt dominum, benedicit et terra, < benedicunt et stellae>: et stellas non ad intellegibiles naturas referimus, sed ad ueritatem. laudant etiam dracones dominum, quia natura eorum et species, cum uidetur, non minimum uel decoris offundit uel inesse rationis ostendit.

Nor has it escaped me that some have referred the heavens of heavens to the intellectual powers and the firmament to the active ones. And so the heavens praise, or tell the glory of God, and the firmament announces it, not as spiritual beings, but as works of the world they tell it, as we said above. Others again have interpreted the waters above the heavens as purifying powers. We accept these things as an ornament of the treatment; yet it does not seem foreign or absurd to us if we understand real waters, for the reason we gave. For dew and frost and cold and heat, according to the prophetic hymn, bless the Lord; the earth blesses him, and the stars bless him; and we refer the stars not to intellectual natures but to their reality. Even the dragons praise the Lord, because their nature and appearance, when seen, either spreads no little beauty or shows that there is reason in it.

Ps 148:4 (allusion, high confidence) · Ps 19:1 (18:2 LXX) (allusion, high confidence) · Ps 148:7–8 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Allegories of the heavens and waters as spiritual powers are allowed, but Ambrose takes the waters above as real.

  • The allegory of the waters as powers is Origen's; Basil rejects it at Hexaemeron 3.9.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip marked as an error in the digital text.; The digital text prints both the misprint and its correction.): lntellegibilesintellegibiles → intellegibiles; operatonas → operatorias.

Extrabiblical texts: Pr Azar 64-74 (Prayer of Azariah and Song of the Three Young Men [in RC, EO, ETH canons]; allusion); Basil, Hex. 3.9 (Homilies on the Hexaemeron; allusion)

Topics: Creation, Interpreting Scripture

Cite (SBL): Ambrose, Hex. 2.17 (CSEL 32.1:56–57; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/ambrose-hexameron/2-17). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ambrose-hexameron-2-17) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin (Schenkl, CSEL 32.1); checked afterwards against FOTC 42 (private error-checking only).

2.18CSEL 32.1:57

Et uidit deus quia bonum est. facit filius quod uult pater, laudat pater quod facit filius. nihil in illo naturae degeneris inuenitur, cuius opus a paterna non degenerat uoluntate. uidit utique: non oculis corporalibus intendit, sed definiuit plenitudini gratiae conuenire, ut mihi eius iudicium cognosceretur; nos enim solemus etiam de iis quae diuina sunt disputare. et quid mirum, si de opere retractare possint qui de ipsius operatoris generatione faciunt quaestiones? ipsum in iudicium uocant, ipsum inaequalem atque degenerem adserere conantur. ideo legis et dixit deus et fecit deus: eodem pater et filius maiestatis honorantur nomine. et uidit deus quia bonum. dixit tamquam omnia quae pater uellet scienti et uidit tamquam omnia quae filius faceret scientia tenens et efficiens operatione consorti. uidit quia bonum.

“And God saw that it was good.” The Son does what the Father wills, the Father praises what the Son does. Nothing of a degenerate nature is found in him, whose work does not fall short of the Father's will. He saw, certainly: not that he directed bodily eyes, but he determined that it accorded with the fullness of grace, so that his judgment would be known to me; for we are accustomed to dispute even about divine things. And what wonder if those can revise the work who raise questions about the generation of the worker himself? They call him to judgment, they try to assert that he is unequal and degenerate. That is why you read both “God said” and “God made”: Father and Son are honoured by the same name of majesty. “And God saw that it was good.” He spoke as to one who knew everything the Father willed, and saw as one holding in knowledge everything the Son would do and bringing it about by a shared operation. He saw that it was good.

Gen 1:8 (quotation, high confidence) · John 5:19 (allusion, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: “God said” and “God made” show Father and Son sharing one name and one operation, against those who make the Son inferior.

  • Anti-Arian argument, translated as written. Gen 1:8 in the Old Latin and Greek includes “and God saw that it was good” for the second day.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip marked as an error in the digital text.): diiit → dixit.

Extrabiblical texts: Basil, Hex. 3.10 (Homilies on the Hexaemeron; allusion)

Topics: Trinity, Christology, Arianism

Cite (SBL): Ambrose, Hex. 2.18 (CSEL 32.1:57; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/ambrose-hexameron/2-18). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ambrose-hexameron-2-18) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin (Schenkl, CSEL 32.1); checked afterwards against FOTC 42 (private error-checking only).

2.19CSEL 32.1:57–58

non utique cognouit quod nesciebat, sed probauit quod placebat. non quasi incognitum placuit opus, quia nec quasi incognitus pater, qui conplacuit in filio, sicut scriptum est: hic est filius meus dilectissimus, in quo conplacui. scit autem semper filius uoluntatem patris et pater filii, et audit patrem filius semper et pater filium per unitatem naturae, uoluntatis atque substantiae. denique testatur hoc in euangelio suo filius dicens ad patrem: sciebam quod semper me audis. imago est enim laudantium dei filius. omnia patris quasi imago exprimit, omnia eius quasi splendor gloriae inluminat nobis atque manifestat. uidet et filius patris opus sicut et pater filii, sicut ipse dominus declarauit: non potest filius facere a se quidquam nisi quod uiderit facientem patrem. uidet ergo facientem patrem et uidet per secretum inuisibilis naturae et audit similiter. denique ait: sicut audio et iudico, et iudicium meum uerum est, quia non sum solus, sed ego et qui me misit pater.

He did not, of course, learn what he did not know, but approved what pleased him. The work did not please as something unknown, just as the Father, who was well pleased in the Son, was not well pleased as with one unknown, as it is written: “This is my most beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.” The Son always knows the Father's will and the Father the Son's; the Son always hears the Father and the Father the Son, through the unity of nature, will, and substance. Indeed, the Son testifies to this in his Gospel, saying to the Father: “I knew that you always hear me.” For the Son is the image of the invisible God. As the image he expresses everything of the Father; as the brightness of glory he illuminates and shows us everything of his. The Son sees the Father's work as the Father sees the Son's, as the Lord himself declared: “The Son can do nothing of himself except what he sees the Father doing.” He sees the Father doing, then, and sees through the secret of the invisible nature, and hears likewise. So he says: “As I hear, I judge, and my judgment is true, because I am not alone, but I and the Father who sent me.”

Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.

Matt 3:17 (quotation, high confidence) · John 11:42 (quotation, high confidence) · Col 1:15 (allusion, high confidence) · Heb 1:3 (allusion, high confidence) · John 5:19 (quotation, high confidence) · John 5:30 (quotation, high confidence) · John 8:16 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: God's approval of his work reflects the perfect mutual knowledge of Father and Son in one nature.

  • The digital text reads “imago est enim laudantium dei filius”; “laudantium” is corrupt, evidently for “inuisibilis” (Col 1:15), and is translated so.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (Joined words in the digital text.): deniqueait → denique ait.

Topics: Trinity, Christology

Cite (SBL): Ambrose, Hex. 2.19 (CSEL 32.1:57–58; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/ambrose-hexameron/2-19). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ambrose-hexameron-2-19) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin (Schenkl, CSEL 32.1); checked afterwards against FOTC 42 (private error-checking only).

2.20CSEL 32.1:58

hoc mysticum est, illud morale. uidit mihi, probauit mihi. quod deus probauit tu reprehensibile ne dixeris, quoniam quod deus mundauit, tu commune ne dixeris scriptum tibi esse meministi. ergo bonum dei nemo blasphemet. et si firmamentum bonum, quanto magis bonus eius creator, etiamsi Ariani nolint, Eunomiani reclament, radicis degeneris fructus deterior.

That is the mystical sense; this is the moral. He saw for me, he approved for me. What God has approved, do not call blameworthy, since you remember that it is written for you: “What God has cleansed, do not call common.” Let no one, then, blaspheme God's good. And if the firmament is good, how much more is its creator good, even if the Arians are unwilling and the Eunomians protest, the worse fruit of a degenerate root.

Acts 10:15 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: What God approved is good, and its creator still more so, against the Arians and Eunomians.

  • Polemic against the Arians and Eunomius, translated as written.

Topics: Heresy, Arianism

Cite (SBL): Ambrose, Hex. 2.20 (CSEL 32.1:58; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/ambrose-hexameron/2-20). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ambrose-hexameron-2-20) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin (Schenkl, CSEL 32.1); checked afterwards against FOTC 42 (private error-checking only).

2.21CSEL 32.1:58–59

uidit inquit deus quia bonum est. solent artifices singula prius facere et postea habili commissione conectere, ut qui uultus hominum uel corpora excudunt de marmore uel aere fingunt uel litorali exprimunt, non tamen sciunt quemadmodum sibi possint membra singula conuenire et quid gratiae adferat futura conexio. et ideo aut laudare non audent aut pro parte laudant, deus uero tamquam aestimator uniuersitatis praeuidens quae futura sunt quasi perfecta iam laudat quae adhuc in primi operis exordio sunt, finem operis cognitione praeueniens. nec mirum apud quem rerum perfectio non in consummatione operis, sed in suae praedestinatione est uoluntatis. laudat singula quasi conuenientia futuris, laudat plenitudinem singulorum uenustate conpositam. illa est enim uera pulchritudo et in singulis membris esse quod deceat et in toto, ut in singulis gratia, in omnibus formae conuenientis plenitudo laudetur.

“God saw,” he says, “that it was good.” Craftsmen usually make the single parts first and afterward join them with skilful fitting, like those who carve human faces or bodies from marble, or mould them in bronze or wax; yet they do not know how the single members can fit together and what grace the future joining will bring. So either they do not dare to praise, or they praise in part. But God, as the judge of the whole, foreseeing what is to come, praises as already complete what is still at the first beginning of the work, anticipating the end of the work by his knowledge. Nor is it a wonder in one for whom the perfection of things lies not in the completion of the work but in the predestination of his will. He praises the single parts as fitting what is to come; he praises the fullness made up of the beauty of the single parts. For that is true beauty, that what is fitting be both in the single members and in the whole, so that grace is praised in the parts and in all the fullness of a fitting form.

Gen 1:8 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Unlike human artists, God praises each part already knowing the beauty of the finished whole.

  • “Wax” translates the sense where the digital text has “litorali”.

Extrabiblical texts: Basil, Hex. 3.10 (Homilies on the Hexaemeron; allusion)

Cite (SBL): Ambrose, Hex. 2.21 (CSEL 32.1:58–59; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/ambrose-hexameron/2-21). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ambrose-hexameron-2-21) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin (Schenkl, CSEL 32.1); checked afterwards against FOTC 42 (private error-checking only).

2.22CSEL 32.1:59

sed iam secundus nobis claudatur dies, ne dum opus astruimus firmamenti, infirmiores eos qui audiunt dicendi florentibus faciamus, dum in noctem sermo producitur, quae adhuc carens lunae stellarumque lumine — nondum enim luminaria creata sunt caeli — obscuritatem possit adferre remeantibus: simul ut cibo potuque curentur corpora, ne animis epulantibus fragilitas carnis de nocturno quoque ieiunio conqueratur.

But now let the second day be closed for us, lest while we build up the work of the firmament we make our hearers weaker from the flow of speaking, as the sermon is drawn out into the night, which, still lacking the light of the moon and stars (for the lights of heaven have not yet been created), could bring darkness to those going home; and at the same time so that bodies may be cared for with food and drink, and while the souls feast the weakness of the flesh may not complain of a night-time fast as well.

Notes and citation

Summary: Ambrose ends the second day's sermon before nightfall so his hearers can go home and eat.

Extrabiblical texts: Basil, Hex. 3.10 (Homilies on the Hexaemeron; allusion)

Cite (SBL): Ambrose, Hex. 2.22 (CSEL 32.1:59; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/ambrose-hexameron/2-22). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ambrose-hexameron-2-22) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin (Schenkl, CSEL 32.1); checked afterwards against FOTC 42 (private error-checking only).

Chapter 3

3.1CSEL 32.1:59

DIES TERTIUS. Dies tertius nobis hodie in sermone nascitur, qui ortus est in lectione, praeclarus dies, qui terram a naufragio liberauit dicente deo: congregetur aqua quae est sub caelo in congregationem unam. de quo praefationem adoriri placet. congregetur aqua dictum est, et congregata est: et frequenter dicitur populus congregetur et non congregatur. non mediocris pudor est imperio dei insensibilia elementa parere et homines non oboedire, quibus sensus ab ipso tributus auctore est. et fortasse hic pudor fecerit, ut hodie plures conueniretis, ne quo die congregata est aqua in congregationem unam, et hodie populus nequaquam congregatus in ecclesiam domini uideretur.

The Third Day. Today the third day is born for us in our sermon, as it has dawned in the reading: a glorious day, which freed the earth from shipwreck when God said: “Let the water that is under heaven be gathered into one gathering.” With this I wish to begin my preface. “Let the water be gathered,” it was said, and it was gathered; yet often it is said, “Let the people be gathered,” and they are not gathered. It is no small shame that senseless elements obey the command of God and men do not obey, to whom sense was given by the creator himself. And perhaps this shame has made more of you come together today, so that on the day on which the water was gathered into one gathering the people might not seem today to be by no means gathered into the church of the Lord.

Gen 1:9 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The water obeyed God's command to gather; Ambrose's congregation should be as obedient in gathering for church.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (Stray marks in the digital text.): populus congregetur\\ et → populus congregetur et.

Extrabiblical texts: Basil, Hex. 4.1 (Homilies on the Hexaemeron; allusion)

Cite (SBL): Ambrose, Hex. 3.1 (CSEL 32.1:59; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/ambrose-hexameron/3-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ambrose-hexameron-3-1) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin (Schenkl, CSEL 32.1); checked afterwards against FOTC 42 (private error-checking only).