Against the Jews, Pagans, and Arians (Sermon on the Creed) 1–12
Authorship disputed: Transmitted among the sermons of Augustine; assigned to Quodvultdeus by modern scholarship.
Latin text: Migne, PL 42 (Latin text: Migne, Patrologia Latina, digitized by Open Greek and Latin (patrologia_latina-dev, University of Leipzig), CC BY-SA 4.0).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0).
Chapter 1
1PL 42
Inter pressuras atque angustias præsentis temporis et nostræ officia servitutis cogimur, dilectissimi, non tacere, cum potius expediat flere magis quam aliquid dicere: verumtamen ne quid minus lucri arcæ dominicæ accedens, dicatur nobis, Serve nequam et piger, tu erogare pecuniam meam, et ego veniens cum usuris exigerem eam (Matth. xxv, 26, 27): peto Charitatem vestram, ut quæ ipse paterfamilias per nos vobis ministraverit, libenter accipere dignemini: Apostoli verba sunt, Nox præcessit, dies autem appropinquavit: deponentes ergo opera tenebrarum induite vos arma lucis (Rom. XIII, 12). Expulsa itaque noctis caligine, effugatisque tenebris peccatorum, radius veri luminis fulgeat in cordibus nostris. Exigit enim a nobis ratio hujus tantae congregationis, et noctis transactæ vobis reddere rationem, et istius diei de tanto sacramento percepto veram sempiternamque demonstrare salutem. Si enim opera transactae noctis consideremus, et quid egerimus, Domino donante, explicare valuerimus; inveniemus nos in nocte, non opera noctis, sed diei peregisse. Neque enim delectatione somni sopitos sensus nostros agnovimus, nec phantasmatibus animas nostras illusas, nec ipsa corpora stramentorum calore depressa in alto sopore requies inclinavit: sed vigilando, orando, psallendo, contra adversarium diabolum dimicando, et magnam lucem infusam cordibus nostris sensimus, et in nocte opera diei peregimus. Quid enim egimus in hac nocte? Diabolum fugavimus, Christum introduximus. Quid egimus in hac nocte? Captivatorem captivavimus. Quid egimus in hac nocte? Tenebras diabolicas de cordibus vestris exclusimus, lumen verum hauriendum esse demonstravimus. Quid actum est in hac nocte? Veniens vera fortitudo alligavit fortem, et vasa domus ejus diripuit (Matth. XII). Quid actum est in hac nocte? Exstirpata est superbia, introducta est humilitas. Quid actum est in hac nocte? Princeps omnium vitiorum expulsus est, fons omnium bonorum susceptus est. Videtis, dilectissimi, quæ bona habeatis præparata, et ex quo onere, vel ex quibus sarcinis peccatorum relevamini ab isto qui vos vocat ut suscipiatis iugum ejus lene, et sarcinam ejus levem (Id. XI, 29): Deponentes itaque opera tenebrarum, induite vos arma lucis. Quid sit hoc, ex verbis Symboli quod modo accepistis, vobis expositum esse cognoscite. Quid est, Deponite opera tenebrarum; nisi, Renuntiate diabolo, pompis, et angelis ejus? Et quid est, Induite vos arma lucis; nisi, Credite in Deum Patrem omnipotentem?
Amid the pressures and straits of the present time and the duties of our service we are compelled, dearly beloved, not to keep silent, though it would be more fitting to weep than to say anything. Yet, so that the Lord’s treasury may receive no less profit, and it not be said to us, “Wicked and lazy servant, you should have paid out my money, and on my return I would have required it with interest,” I ask your Charity to be pleased to receive gladly what the householder himself has ministered to you through us. These are the Apostle’s words: “The night is far gone, the day is at hand; so cast off the works of darkness and put on the armor of light.” So, with the gloom of night driven out and the darkness of sins put to flight, let the ray of the true light shine in our hearts. For the purpose of this great gathering requires of us both to give you an account of the night that has passed and to show the true and everlasting salvation of this day, from the great sacrament you have received. If we consider the works of the past night, and can, by the Lord’s gift, explain what we did, we will find that in the night we did not the works of the night but those of the day. For we did not find our senses lulled by the pleasure of sleep, nor our souls deceived by phantoms, nor did rest bend our bodies, weighed down by the warmth of bedding, into deep slumber; but by keeping vigil, praying, singing psalms, and fighting against the adversary the devil, we felt a great light poured into our hearts and did the works of the day in the night. What, then, did we do this night? We put the devil to flight; we brought Christ in. What did we do this night? We took the captor captive. What did we do this night? We shut the devil’s darkness out of your hearts; we showed that the true light must be drunk in. What was done this night? The true strength came, bound the strong man, and plundered the goods of his house. What was done this night? Pride was rooted out, humility brought in. What was done this night? The prince of all vices was driven out, the fountain of all good things was received. You see, dearly beloved, what good things you have prepared for you, and from what burden, from what loads of sins, you are relieved by him who calls you to take up his easy yoke and his light burden. “Cast off,” then, “the works of darkness and put on the armor of light.” What this means, know that it has been explained to you from the words of the Creed which you have just received. What is “Cast off the works of darkness,” if not “Renounce the devil, his pomps, and his angels”? And what is “Put on the armor of light,” if not “Believe in God the Father almighty”?
Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.
Matt 25:26–27 (quotation, medium confidence) · Rom 13:12 (quotation, high confidence) · Eph 4:8 (echo, low confidence) · Matt 12:29 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 11:29–30 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: After the night vigil the preacher explains to those about to be baptized that renouncing the devil means casting off the works of darkness and believing in God means putting on the armor of light.
- The sermon is addressed to candidates for baptism who have just received the Creed. Migne prints marginal headings at the start of each chapter (here “Christianæ vigiliæ”); they are removed. The parable quotation (Matt 25:26–27, cf. Luke 19:23) is given loosely; the printed “tu erogare” is translated by sense.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's marginal heading removed; OCR slip; OCR slip in Migne's reference; footnote marker removed): Christianæ vigiliæ. → ; Apostoli,orba sunt → Apostoli verba sunt; (Rom. XIII, 42) → (Rom. XIII, 12); ilaqoe → itaque; bujus tantae → hujus tantae; dcmonstrare → demonstrare; consideremus 1, → consideremus,; notros → nostros; opera dici → opera diei; bac nocte? Diabolum → hac nocte? Diabolum; exclusivimus → exclusimus; (Matth. xn) → (Matth. XII); QUid actum est in bac → Quid actum est in hac; babeatis → habeatis; ctex quo → et ex quo; rjus lene → ejus lene; (Id. x!, 29) → (Id. XI, 29); diaboio → diabolo; quid cst, → quid est,.
Topics: Baptism, The devil and demons
Cite (SBL): Quodvultdeus, Iud. pag. Ar. 1 (PL 42; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/quodvultdeus-contra-iudaeos/1). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/quodvultdeus-contra-iudaeos/1
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-quodvultdeus-contra-iudaeos-1) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text, badly damaged in places; Migne's notes, headings and admonitions removed by logged corrections; some restored readings marked conjectural). No public-domain or FOTC English exists; re-read against the Latin.
Chapter 2
2PL 42
Prius tamen, dilectissimi, discutiamus, qui sit, vel quid sit diabolus, et quæ sint pompæ ejus, quibus renuntiantes, opera deponimus tenebrarum: tunc demum de Deo Patre omnipotente, qui est vera lux, quantum ipse donaverit, Charitati vestræ dicemus. Quid est diabolus? Angelus per superbiam separatus a Deo. qui non stetit in veritate, auctor mendacii, et a semetipso deceptus, qui alterum decipere concupivit. Iste adversarius effectus humani generis, inventor mortis, superbiae institutor, radix malitiæ, scelerum caput, princeps omnium vitiorum, persuasor etiam turpium voluptatum Hic dum illum primum, Adam scilicet, patrem omnium nostrum intueretur, videretque hominem ex limo terræ ad imaginem Dei factum, pudicitia ornatum, temperantia compositum, charitate circumdatum, immortalitate vestitum, æmulus atque invidus hæc hominem terrenum accepisse, quod ipse dum esset angelus per superbiam cognoscitur amisisse, invidit statim insatiabilis homicida, eosque nostros primos parentes illis donis ac tantis bonis exspoliavit, insuper et peremit. Namque, dilectissimi, cum tanta bona homini diabolus abstulisset, pudicitiam, continentiam, charitatem. immortalitatem, eumque nudatum ac turpem reddidisset, obsitum suis pannis deridens eum, suo dominio obstrinxit, atque ex illo vinculo omnem prolem ejus sibimet obligavit. Turpes enim pannos suscepit Adam, quando a diabolo exspoliatus, amissa pudicitia, accinctus est impudicitia; amissa temperantia, intemperans effectus est; perdita charitate, malus inventus est; exspoliatus immortalitate, morti propinatus est. Heu! quid perdidit, et quid accepit! Ad hos etiam turpissimos pannos suos posteros obligavit.
But first, dearly beloved, let us discuss who or what the devil is, and what his pomps are, by renouncing which we cast off the works of darkness; then at last, so far as he grants, we will speak to your Charity about God the Father almighty, who is the true light. What is the devil? An angel separated from God through pride, who did not stand in the truth, the author of the lie, deceived by himself, who desired to deceive another. He became the adversary of the human race, the inventor of death, the founder of pride, the root of malice, the head of crimes, the prince of all vices, and the persuader to shameful pleasures. When he looked upon that first man, Adam, the father of us all, and saw man made from the mud of the earth in the image of God, adorned with chastity, ordered by temperance, surrounded by love, clothed with immortality, he was jealous and envious that an earthly man had received the things which he himself, while he was an angel, is known to have lost through pride. At once the insatiable murderer envied, and stripped our first parents of those gifts and so many good things, and killed them besides. For, dearly beloved, when the devil had taken from man such great goods, chastity, continence, love, immortality, and had made him naked and shameful, he mocked him, clothed in his own rags, bound him to his dominion, and by that bond made all his offspring his own. For Adam took on shameful rags when he was stripped by the devil: having lost chastity, he was girded with unchastity; having lost temperance, he became intemperate; having lost love, he was found evil; stripped of immortality, he was handed over to death. Alas, what he lost, and what he received! To these most shameful rags of his he bound his descendants as well.
Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.
John 8:44 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 2:7 (allusion, medium confidence) · Gen 1:27 (allusion, medium confidence) · Gen 3:7 (echo, low confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The devil, a proud angel who fell, envied Adam and stripped him of chastity, temperance, love, and immortality, binding all his descendants with him.
- The printed text is damaged at “exspo- Hiatus pudicitia”; the correction restores the evident sense (“stripped … having lost chastity”).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's marginal heading removed; OCR slip; damaged OCR; evident sense restored; stray mark removed): Diabolus qui sit. → ; dileelissimi → dilectissimi; diabulus → diabolus; scparatus → separatus; stctit → stetit; bumani gcneris, inventor mor'is superbiae → humani generis, inventor mortis, superbiae; priinum → primum; onmium → omnium; liominem → hominem; pudicilia → pudicitia; bominem → hominem; exspo- Hiatus pudicitia → exspoliatus, amissa pudicitia; accepit 1 Ad → accepit! Ad; pannos I suos → pannos suos.
Topics: The devil and demons, The fall
Cite (SBL): Quodvultdeus, Iud. pag. Ar. 2 (PL 42; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/quodvultdeus-contra-iudaeos/2). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/quodvultdeus-contra-iudaeos/2
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-quodvultdeus-contra-iudaeos-2) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text, badly damaged in places; Migne's notes, headings and admonitions removed by logged corrections; some restored readings marked conjectural). No public-domain or FOTC English exists; re-read against the Latin.
Chapter 3
3PL 42:1119
Renuntiemus huic damnosae hæreditati: pupilli effecti sumus. Antequam exactor veniat, tam pessimæ hæreditati, in qua sunt panni diaboli, pompae scilicet et angelis ejus si quis renuntiare neglexerit; cum judex venerit. sicut Evangelium loquitur, tradetur debitor exactori, exactor autem debitorem in carcerem trudet. Amen dico tibi, ait Dominus, non exies inde, donec reddas novissimum quadrantem (Matth. v, 26). Omne itaque genus humanum tanquam pauperem et pupillum commendat Scriptura divina, dicens Deo, Tibi derelictus est pauper, pupillo tu eris adjutor. Ejusque adversarium diabolum demonstrans, secutus adjunxit, Contere brachium peccatoris et maligni (Psal. II, 14, 15. sec. Hebræos). Adsit itaque aliquis homo pius, et aliquam misericordiam huic pupillo et pauperi exhibeat. Ferocem enim atque callidum adversarium patitur, et hic pupillus in causa sua deficit; quoniam eum suus adversarius pravis actibus obligavit. Adhibeamus huic pupillo idoneos defensores, et Apostolorum tanquam jurisperitorum cœlestium ei patrocinium subrogemus. Quid est agendum apud tales pro tali? Apud vos itaque, Petre, Paule, Joannes, cæterique sancti consiliarii veri judicis, amici summae potestatis, causam exponimus, quam optime nostis, hujus pauperis et pupilli, generis scilicet humani, qui ex paterno chirographo debitor inventus reus, atque constrictus ab adversario detinetur: non est aliud, quemadmodum huic subveniatur, nisi ex vestro consilio. Quid itaque in hoc negotio vestrae serenitati videatur pro hujus miseri libertate, ex communi tractatu unitam pro eo dignamini proferre sententiam. Et vos enim astrinxerat hæc obligatio, nisi vobis gratia subveniret. Liberati liberate: consilium quod a vero judice accepistis, promite; ut hoc sequatur qui captivus detinetur, atque ex mala servitute per vestram defensionem ad veram perveniat libertatem. Et haec est vox omnium: Quod fuimus faciat. Quid, obsecro, facturus est? Renuntiet diabolo, pompis et angelis ejus: hæc est illa damnosa hæreditas, cui renuntiare compellimur. Videtis, dilectissimi, qualem sententiam protulerunt nostri defensores.
Let us renounce this ruinous inheritance: we have become orphans. If anyone neglects to renounce, before the collector comes, this worst of inheritances, in which are the devil’s rags, that is, his pomps and his angels, then when the judge comes, as the Gospel says, the debtor will be handed over to the collector, and the collector will thrust the debtor into prison. “Truly I say to you,” says the Lord, “you will not get out from there until you pay the last penny.” So divine Scripture commends the whole human race as a poor man and an orphan, saying to God, “To you the poor man is left; you will be the orphan’s helper.” And pointing to his adversary the devil, it adds next, “Break the arm of the sinner and the wicked.” Let some devout person come forward, then, and show some mercy to this orphan and poor man. For he faces a fierce and cunning adversary, and this orphan is losing his case, because his adversary has bound him through evil deeds. Let us bring in suitable advocates for this orphan, and put in his place the patronage of the apostles, as of heavenly jurists. What must be done before such persons for such a one? Before you, then, Peter, Paul, John, and you other holy counsellors of the true Judge, friends of the supreme power, we set out the case, which you know very well, of this poor man and orphan, the human race, who, found a debtor and guilty under his father’s bond, is held bound by the adversary. There is no other way for him to be helped except by your counsel. So whatever seems good to your serenity in this matter for this wretch’s freedom, deign after common deliberation to give a united opinion on his behalf. For this obligation had bound you too, had grace not come to your aid. You who have been set free, set free: bring out the counsel you received from the true Judge, so that he who is held captive may follow it and pass through your defence from evil slavery to true freedom. And this is the voice of all: “Let him do what we did.” What, I pray, is he to do? Let him renounce the devil, his pomps, and his angels: this is that ruinous inheritance which we are compelled to renounce. You see, dearly beloved, what opinion our defenders have given.
Matt 5:25–26 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 10:14–15 (9:35-Ps Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · Col 2:14 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Pleading the case of the human race, an orphan in debt to the devil, before the apostles, the preacher gives their verdict: renounce the devil, his pomps, and his angels.
- The Psalm is cited by Migne “according to the Hebrews” (Vulgate Ps 9:35–36). The printed “Quod fuimus faciat” (“let him do what we were”) is translated by sense as “what we did”.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's marginal heading removed; OCR slip; OCR slip; footnote marker removed; stray mark): Renuntiare satanæ, quid. → ; trudct → trudet; itaquo genus hnmanum tanquam pnupercm → itaque genus humanum tanquam pauperem; seculus → secutus; ct pauperi → et pauperi; Fcrocem → Ferocem; |atitur → patitur; ci patrocinium subrogemus 1. → ei patrocinium subrogemus.; cauSam → causam; qucmadmoduni → quemadmodum; dignamini' → dignamini; Lihcrati * liberate → Liberati liberate; aceepistis → accepistis; cst vox → est vox; cjus: hæc → ejus: hæc.
Topics: Baptism
Cite (SBL): Quodvultdeus, Iud. pag. Ar. 3 (PL 42:1119; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/quodvultdeus-contra-iudaeos/3). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/quodvultdeus-contra-iudaeos/3
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-quodvultdeus-contra-iudaeos-3) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text, badly damaged in places; Migne's notes, headings and admonitions removed by logged corrections; some restored readings marked conjectural). No public-domain or FOTC English exists; re-read against the Latin.
Chapter 4
4PL 42:1119
Vigilet itaque unusquisque, ne non ex toto renuntians post professionem, apud eum diabolus suos pannos recognoscat: et incipiat reus semper detineri, quem Christus voluit sua gratia liberare. Nec sibi blandiantur, qui post gratiam acceptam corrigi nolunt, atque rursus ad illas suas pristinas redeunt voluptates. Exspectatur enim dies judicii, aderit ille æquissimus judex, qui nullius potentis personam accipiet, cujus palatium auro argentove nemo corrumpet. Astabunt omnes animæ, ut referat unaquæque secundum ea quæ per corpus gessit, sive bonum, sive malum (II Cor v, 10). Præsto enim erit et adversarius diabolus; recitabuntur verba professionis nostræ. Etsi talis inventus fuerit quisque, ut debitor ex hac vita migret; exsultabit ille adversarius in conspectu severissimi judicis, superiorem se esse clamans, agens talem causam apud talem judicem: Æquissime, inquit, judex justo, judica:Justitia et judicium præparatio sedis tuæ (Psal. LXXXVIII, 15). Judica meum esse, qui tuus esse noluit: meus est, mecum damnandus est. Post renuntiationem utquid invasit pannos meos? Quid apud eum impudicitia faciebat, cui ipse renuntiaverat? Quid intemperantia, quid avaritia, quid ira, quid superbia, quid cætera mea? Postremo, æquissime: fugientem a me, confugientem ad te, postea cum meis quibus renuntiaverat apprehendi, invasorem detinui: in ipsa quodam modo mea possessione a me apprehensus est. Quid enim in circo faciebat, atque ibi furias, lites, insanas voces, inanesque victorias, cum jam a se alienas sibimet dividebat? Quid in theatro faciebat renuntiator turpium voluptatum? Quid in amphitheatro crudelitates suis oculis intuendo? Thesaurizavit sibi iram in die iræ (Rom. II, 5). Hæc omnia mea post renuntiationem invasit, meus esse voluit, et mea concupivit. Judica, judex æquissime: quoniam quem tu dignatus es tanto pretio liberare, ipse mihi se postmodum Voluit obligare. Poterit, dilectissimi, os aperire is qui post professionem suam talis invenitur, ut juste diabolo addicatur? Videte quid agatis, filii mei, fratres mei; videte quid agatis, quomodo hanc professionem vestram custodiatis. Contestamur vos per ipsum judicem omnesque potestates cœlestes, quæ et nos audiunt admonentes, et vos excipiunt profitentes, ne in vacuum gratiam Dei accipiatis (II Cor. VI, 1), sed corde integro, tota virtute, perfecta fide renuntiantes atque spernentes tam damnosam diabolicam hæreditatem, ne pupilli vel pauperes remaneatis.
Let each one keep watch, then, lest, if he has not renounced wholly after his profession, the devil recognize his own rags on him, and he who Christ willed to free by his grace begin to be held guilty for ever. Let those not flatter themselves who after receiving grace refuse to be corrected and go back again to their former pleasures. For the day of judgment is awaited; that most just judge will be present, who will show favor to no powerful person, and whose palace no one will corrupt with gold or silver. All souls will stand there, that each may receive according to what it did through the body, whether good or evil. The adversary the devil will also be present; the words of our profession will be read out. And if anyone is found such that he leaves this life a debtor, that adversary will exult in the sight of the most severe judge, crying that he has won, and pleading such a case before such a judge: “Most just judge,” he says, “judge justly: justice and judgment are the preparation of your throne. Judge that he is mine, who refused to be yours: he is mine; he must be condemned with me. After the renunciation, why did he seize my rags? What was unchastity, which he had renounced, doing with him? What intemperance, what avarice, what anger, what pride, what the rest of my things? Lastly, most just one: he fled from me and took refuge with you, and afterwards I caught him with my things which he had renounced; I held him as a trespasser; he was caught by me, as it were, on my own property. For what was he doing in the circus, there taking sides in frenzies, quarrels, mad shouting, and empty victories, things he had already put away from himself? What was the renouncer of shameful pleasures doing in the theater? What in the amphitheater, gazing with his eyes on cruelties? He has stored up wrath for himself on the day of wrath. All these things of mine he seized after the renunciation; he chose to be mine, and he coveted what is mine. Judge, most just judge: for he whom you deigned to free at so great a price afterwards chose to bind himself to me.” Will he who is found such after his profession, dearly beloved, be able to open his mouth, when he is justly handed over to the devil? See what you are doing, my sons, my brothers; see what you are doing, how you keep this profession of yours. We adjure you by the Judge himself and by all the heavenly powers, which both hear us admonishing you and receive you as you profess, not to receive the grace of God in vain, but to renounce and spurn so ruinous an inheritance of the devil with a whole heart, with all your strength, and with perfect faith, so that you do not remain orphans or poor.
2 Cor 5:10 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 89:14 (88:15 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 2:5 (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Cor 6:1 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 2:11 (echo, low confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: At the judgment the devil will claim as his own any baptized person who after renouncing him went back to the circus, theater, and amphitheater, so the candidates must keep their profession.
- The printed “ut juste diabolo addicatur” is translated by sense (“when he is justly handed over”).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's marginal heading removed; OCR slip; footnote marker removed; stray mark removed): Relapsus a Baptismo. → ; iiaque → itaque; nou ex toto → non ex toto; apud cum diabolus → apud eum diabolus; poa gratiam → post gratiam; Exspectatur enim des → Exspectatur enim dies; Astabuat → Astabunt; sive tii. lum → sive malum; cril ct adversarius → erit et adversarius; Et?i → Etsi; debtor → debitor; severissimi 1 judicis → severissimi judicis; sedis tun (Psal. LXXXVIII, 15;. Jedica meum esse, qni → sedis tuæ (Psal. LXXXVIII, 15). Judica meum esse, qui; renuntraverat → renuntiaverat; qaid avaritia → quid avaritia; æquissimc → æquissime; detiaui → detinui; lites I, → lites,; lum jam a se alicnas sibimct → cum jam a se alienas sibimet; thealio → theatro; amphitheatio crudel tates suis oculis intuendo' → amphitheatro crudelitates suis oculis intuendo?; ir.un in die inc → iram in die iræ; Judica, judico' → Judica, judex; Potelil, dilectissimi, ns aperire → Poterit, dilectissimi, os aperire; iuvenitur → invenitur; tilii mei → filii mei; cxcip unt → excipiunt; rcmaneatis → remaneatis.
Topics: Baptism, Eschatology, Ethics, The last judgment, Games, shows, and the theatre
Cite (SBL): Quodvultdeus, Iud. pag. Ar. 4 (PL 42:1119; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/quodvultdeus-contra-iudaeos/4). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/quodvultdeus-contra-iudaeos/4
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-quodvultdeus-contra-iudaeos-4) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text, badly damaged in places; Migne's notes, headings and admonitions removed by logged corrections; some restored readings marked conjectural). No public-domain or FOTC English exists; re-read against the Latin.
Chapter 5
5PL 42:1119
Credite in Deum Patrem omnipotentem. Mutantes Patrem, mutate hæreditatem. Quis est iste Pater omnipotens? Patrem quidem Deum, qui credimus, nostrum atque totius mundi cognoscimus esse per gratiam; sed et proprium ejus Filium quærimus per substantiam: quoniam et antequam ab illo mundus formaretur, Pater erat. Si Pater erat, cujus Pater erat? Erat ei utique Filius ex ipso cum ipso, hoc quod ipse, sed non ipse; quoniam ille Pater, hic Filius: quoniam omnipotens Pater omnipotentem Filium genuit de se, ita æqualem sibi, ut totus maneret in se, et esset Pater Filii, et Filius Patris, Deus ex Deo, dies ex die, lumen ex lumine: nec tamen duo dii, aut duo dies, aut duo luminaria; sed unus Deus, unus dies, unum lumen. Non capis videndo, intellige credendo: munda oculos cordis; imo potius ipsa lux quam desideras videre, mundet cor tuum, ut sit a peccatorum tenebris mundatum: Beati enim mundo corde, quia ipsi Deum videbunt (Matth. v, 8). Ecce extende aciem oculi cordis et vide, aurem cordis accommoda et audi. Pater enim et Filius duo sonant, sed cum ipse Filius dicit, Ego in Patre, et Pater in me est (Joan. xiv, 10), Verbum enim Patris est Filius; Pater autem nunquam fuit sine Verbo, quoniam In principio erat Verbum, et Verbum erat apud Deum, et Deus erat Verbum: hoc erat in principio apud Deum (Id. I, 1); hoc Verbum Filius cum est in Patre, et Pater in Filio suo Verbo suo: non ergo duo dii, sed unus est Deus. Dies ex die, duos videntur significare dies: sed cum ipse Filius in Evangelio dicit Judæis, Abraham pater vester cupivit videre diem meum, et vidit, et lætatus est (Id. VIII, 56); Abraham autem tres videns viros sub quercu Mambre, non tres appellavit dominos, sed unum in omnibus appellavit Dominum, tanquam tres diem unum. Unde ipse Dominus in Evangelio, unum volens intelligi diem Patrem et Filium, Philippo requirenti Patrem tanquam alterum diem, quoniam jam Filium videbat diem, ostendens quo oculo quærere deberet videre Dei unitatem, quia oculum carnis fixerat in humanitatem: Philippe, inquit, qui me vidit, vidit et Patrem; ego enim et Pater non duo dies, sed unus. Si potes capere, cape sempiternum diem.
Believe in God the Father almighty. As you change your father, change your inheritance. Who is this almighty Father? We who believe acknowledge God as Father of ourselves and of the whole world by grace; but we also look for his own Son by substance, for even before the world was formed by him, he was Father. If he was Father, whose Father was he? He surely had a Son, from himself, with himself, what he himself is, but not he himself; for that one is the Father, this one the Son. For the almighty Father begot an almighty Son from himself, so equal to himself that he remained whole in himself, and was Father of the Son, and the Son was Son of the Father: God from God, day from day, light from light; yet not two gods, or two days, or two lights, but one God, one day, one light. If you do not grasp it by seeing, understand it by believing: cleanse the eyes of your heart; or rather, let the very light you long to see cleanse your heart, so that it is cleansed from the darkness of sins: “Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God.” Look, stretch out the eye of your heart and see; turn the ear of your heart and hear. “Father” and “Son” sound like two; but when the Son himself says, “I am in the Father, and the Father is in me,” the Son is the Word of the Father; and the Father was never without the Word, since “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God; he was in the beginning with God.” Since this Word, the Son, is in the Father, and the Father in his Son, his Word, there are not two gods, but one God. “Day from day” seems to mean two days; but the Son himself says in the Gospel to the Jews, “Your father Abraham longed to see my day; he saw it and was glad”; and Abraham, seeing three men under the oak of Mamre, did not call them three lords but addressed one Lord in them all, as though the three were one day. Hence the Lord himself in the Gospel, wishing Father and Son to be understood as one day, answered Philip, who asked for the Father as though for another day, since he already saw the Son as day; and he showed with what eye he should seek to see the unity of God, because Philip had fixed the eye of the flesh on the humanity: “Philip,” he says, “whoever has seen me has seen the Father”; for I and the Father are not two days, but one. If you can grasp it, grasp the everlasting day.
Matt 5:8 (quotation, high confidence) · John 14:10 (quotation, high confidence) · John 1:1–2 (quotation, high confidence) · John 8:56 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 18:1–3 (allusion, high confidence) · John 14:8–9 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: God the almighty Father has a Son equal to himself, God from God, day from day, light from light, yet one God, one day, one light.
- The phrase “God from God, day from day, light from light” adapts creedal language; “day from day” is the preacher’s own addition, explained from John 8:56 and Gen 18. The last clause (“for I and the Father are not two days”) is the preacher’s comment, not part of the quotation of John 14:9.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's marginal heading removed; OCR slip; OCR slip; footnote marker removed; OCR slip; stray mark removed): Triadis unitas. → ; alque totius → atque totius; crat, cujus → erat, cujus; ulique → utique; nun ipse; quoniam i!!c → non ipse; quoniam ille; aqualem → æqualem; vor tuum → cor tuum; Renti euim → Beati enim; < aurom cordis accommoda ct → aurem cordis accommoda et; Patre. ct Pater → Patre, et Pater; Verbum entur → Verbum enim; erut apud → erat apud; eral in principio → erat in principio; (1 d. r, 1 ); boc → (Id. I, 1); hoc; doiniaos → dominos; iu Evangelio → in Evangelio; intel. ligi diem 1 Patrem → intelligi diem Patrem; t'a- trem → Patrem; alterum diein → alterum diem; vidcre → videre; vidit. vidit → vidit, vidit; nou duo dies I, → non duo dies,.
Topics: Trinity
Cite (SBL): Quodvultdeus, Iud. pag. Ar. 5 (PL 42:1119; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/quodvultdeus-contra-iudaeos/5). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/quodvultdeus-contra-iudaeos/5
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-quodvultdeus-contra-iudaeos-5) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text, badly damaged in places; Migne's notes, headings and admonitions removed by logged corrections; some restored readings marked conjectural). No public-domain or FOTC English exists; re-read against the Latin.
Chapter 6
6PL 42:1119–1121
Lumen de lumine duo sonare videntur luminaria: sed absit a nobis, ne nos error Manichæorum conprehendat, qui istum solem æstimant esse Christum: sed nos solem justitiæ credimus Verbum Patris, inseparabilem, æqualem, cum Patre manentem, et omnia cum illo disponentem: Patrem per Filium omnia facientem, fabricam mundi per Verbum suum construentem, Filium ad nos venientem, nec Patrem deserentem, semper cum illo, nusquam sine illo; illuminantem. et de se et de illo splendentem, radiantem, coruscantem: non duo luminaria, sed unum lumen. Ego enim, ait, et Pater unum sumus (Id. X, 30). De ipso Verbo unigenito ait propheta David: Semel locutus est Deus, duo hæc audivi (Psal. LXI, 12) Quomodo semel locutus est Deus, et secundo sonuit; nisi quia Verbum intransgressibile procedens de corde Patris, suscepit carnem, ut. esset homo, ex utero matris? Venit, et mansit: ad nos venit, et a Patre non recessit. Ecce per hoc quod semel locutus est Deus, surrexit omnis fabrica nostra: per hoc quod secundo sonuit, factus est pax nostra, ut solveret inimicitias in carne ( Ephes. II, 14). Hoc Verbum, hoc lumen non respiciens Arianus, audet dicere Filium minorem, quem nos confitemur æqualem: insana contumacia vult de Verbo in corde Patris manente disputare, cum semetipsum non valeat intelligere. Insane hæretice, prius redi ad te, considera te totum, si potes comprehendere te: et tunc disputa de illo qui fecit et me et te. Vide quam non altum sapiebat, sed in simplicitate cordis Deum nosse quærebat ille humilis, qui in uno lapide superbam frontem dejecit Goliæ (I Reg. XVII, 49 ). Vide quam non altum sapiebat: consideravit enim quid in se ipso ageretur; consideravit animam suam, inspexit suam fabricam, discussit se intus quid esset, et ex qua parte molem tam pulchram gubernaret, atque in vasculo luteo quai habitaret domina anima, plena tantis thesauris sapientiæ, scientiæ, prudentiæ: ubi illic essent tanta, tam pretiosa, tam grandia: quæ loca anima obtineret, in qua nullus est locus: atque ex uno fonte quomodo procederent singulae virtutes sine diminutione et exeuntis et profundentis. Vidit hæc, consideravit hæc, voluit nec valuit comprehendere, exclamavit Deo dicens: Mirificata est scientia tua ex me; invaluit, et non potero ad illam ( Psal. CXXXVIII, 6). Hoc fuit dicerc, Quando te possum comprehendere tam magnum, qui me ipsum non valeo explicare extremum et parvum? Videte et alium humilem requirentem modulum suæ infirmitatis, et non excedentem, sed ad humilia inclinantem: Arenam, inquit, maris, et pluviæ guttas, et dies sæculi quis dinumeravit? Altitudinem cœli, et latitudinem terrae, et profundum abyssi quis mensus est? Sapientiam Dei præcedentem omnia quis investigavit (Eccli. I, 2, 3)? Ecce propheta dicit, imo ipse Dominus qui loquebatur per prophetam, quod sapientiam Dei nullus investigavit. Christus est enim Dei virtus et Dei sapientia (I Cor. I, 24). Nullus secundum divinitatem potuit investigare Dei sapientiam: quia secundum id quod Filius natus est de Patre sine matre, nativitatem ejus quis enarrabit (Isai. LIII, 8)?
“Light from light” seems to sound like two lights; but far be it from us, lest the error of the Manichaeans take hold of us, who think that this sun is Christ. We believe that the sun of righteousness is the Word of the Father, inseparable, equal, abiding with the Father and ordering all things with him: the Father doing all things through the Son and building the fabric of the world through his Word; the Son coming to us and not deserting the Father, always with him, never without him, illuminating, shining, beaming, and flashing both from himself and from him: not two lights, but one light. For “I and the Father,” he says, “are one.” Of this only-begotten Word the prophet David says: “God has spoken once; these two things I have heard.” How has God spoken once and sounded a second time, unless the Word, proceeding without passing from the Father’s heart, took flesh from his mother’s womb so as to be man? He came, and he remained: he came to us and did not withdraw from the Father. See, through God’s speaking once our whole fabric arose; through his sounding a second time he became our peace, to dissolve the enmity in the flesh. Not regarding this Word, this light, the Arian dares to call the Son less, whom we confess equal: in mad obstinacy he wants to dispute about the Word abiding in the Father’s heart, when he cannot understand himself. Mad heretic, first come back to yourself, consider your whole self, whether you can comprehend yourself; and then dispute about him who made both me and you. See how that humble man did not think lofty thoughts but sought to know God in simplicity of heart, who with one stone brought down the proud brow of Goliath. See how he did not think lofty thoughts: he considered what went on within himself; he considered his soul, examined his own make, searched within what he was, and from what part he governed so beautiful a frame, and how in a vessel of clay the soul dwelt as mistress, full of such treasures of wisdom, knowledge, and prudence; where such great, precious, and grand things were held there; what places the soul occupied, in which there is no place; and how from one fountain the several virtues proceeded without diminishing either what flows out or what pours it forth. He saw these things, he considered these things; he wished to comprehend them and could not; he cried out to God, saying: “Your knowledge is made wonderful beyond me; it is mighty, and I cannot attain to it.” This was to say: When can I comprehend you, so great, when I cannot explain myself, the lowest and small? See also another humble man who looks at the measure of his weakness and does not go beyond it, but bends to lowly things: “The sand of the sea,” he says, “and the drops of rain, and the days of the age, who has numbered? The height of heaven and the breadth of the earth and the depth of the abyss, who has measured? The wisdom of God that goes before all things, who has searched it out?” See, the prophet says, or rather the Lord himself who spoke through the prophet, that no one has searched out the wisdom of God. For Christ is the power of God and the wisdom of God. No one could search out the wisdom of God according to his divinity; for according to his being born as Son of the Father without a mother, “who shall declare his generation?”
Mal 4:2 (allusion, medium confidence) · John 10:30 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 62:11 (61:12 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · Eph 2:14–16 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Sam 17:49 (allusion, high confidence) · Rom 12:16 (echo, low confidence) · 2 Cor 4:7 (echo, low confidence) · Ps 139:6 (138:6 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 1:24 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 53:8 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The Son is light from light with the Father, one light, against the Manichaeans and the Arians; if David and Sirach could not comprehend even the soul or the creation, no one can search out God’s Wisdom.
- Polemic against Manichaeans and Arians: translated as written. “Intransgressibile” (rendered “without passing”) is taken to mean that the Word proceeds without leaving the Father. The “other humble man” is the author of Sirach, whom the preacher calls a prophet. The printed “quai ha - bitaret” is translated by sense (“how … dwelt”).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's marginal heading removed; OCR slip; OCR slip in Migne's reference; OCR slip; footnote marker removed): Trinitas incomprehensibilis. → ; ab it a nohis → absit a nobis; isium solem → istum solem; crednuus → credimus; inseparabilem,:equalem, cnm → inseparabilem, æqualem, cum; fahricam mundi pcr → fabricam mundi per; descrentem → deserentem; Ego cnim → Ego enim; (ld. x, 50) → (Id. X, 30); s< nuit → sonuit; IIOS venit, et a Patre hon reccssit → nos venit, et a Patre non recessit; sohreretinimicitias → solveret inimicitias; non- respiciens → non respiciens; Filimn → Filium; hærelice → hæretice; censidera → considera; allum sapiebat, sed iu → altum sapiebat, sed in; sapielwt → sapiebat; agerctur → ageretur; ha - bitaret → habitaret; tain pretiosa → tam pretiosa; cx uno → ex uno; sinc diminutione et excuntis → sine diminutione et exeuntis; hæc. voluit → hæc, voluit; exclamavit 3 Deo die cens → exclamavit Deo dicens; Mirificata eat → Mirificata est; ct non excedentem → et non excedentem; pluvlæ → pluviæ; Deminus qni → Dominus qui; viritis → virtus; (/sai. LIII, 8) → (Isai. LIII, 8).
Extrabiblical texts: Sir 1:2-3 (Sirach [in RC, EO, ETH canons]; quotation)
Topics: Trinity, Christology, Heresy, Arianism, Manichaeism
Cite (SBL): Quodvultdeus, Iud. pag. Ar. 6 (PL 42:1119–1121; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/quodvultdeus-contra-iudaeos/6). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/quodvultdeus-contra-iudaeos/6
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-quodvultdeus-contra-iudaeos-6) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text, badly damaged in places; Migne's notes, headings and admonitions removed by logged corrections; some restored readings marked conjectural). No public-domain or FOTC English exists; re-read against the Latin.
Chapter 7
7PL 42:1121
Dic mihi, hæretice, qui audes dicere quod minor sit Dei Sapientia: dic mihi, altitudo coeli quanta sit, latitudo terræ, profundum abyssi? Numera si potes pluviæ guttas, arenam maris, et dies sæculi: tuorum etiam numerum capillorum, quoniam omnes capilli capitis vestri numerati sunt ( Matth. x, 30), dcmonstra mihi, atque explica parva ista inferiora, et tunc tibi credam posse te investigare superiora. Sed non potes, non vales. Spiritus Dei te convincit, qui vos hæreticos ante prævidit. Qui enim ista quæ superius diximus, conscripserunt atque senserunt, spiritu agebantur veritatis, non erroris. Tu autem, hæretice, cum hæc non vales explicare, audes de ipsa quæ investigari non potest, Dei Sapientia disputare: et magnus ubi videris, quia disputas nullo altercante tecum, nullo judice præsidente. Et dum suffragatur tempus errori tuo, existimas te aliquid esse, cum nihil sis: et seductus multos seducere concupiscis; aliquos pecunia, aliquos potentia: tales tibi congregas, quos plurimos tecum perdas. Non est hic tibi labor utilis ad salutem, sed potius ad perniciem Talia enim docendo, imo non docendo, sed potius blasphemando, non cuilibet potenti, sed ipsi Deo Patri in ejus Filio facere demonstraris injurias. Major est Pater, minor est Filius: melior est Pater, inferior Filius. Has contumelias nec homo quilibet sapiens libenter accipiat, qui filium meliorem se ipso, aut parem habere contendit. Unde est etiam illud dictum propheticum: Lætatus est pater in filio sapiente, in vita sua vidit, et in obitu ejus non est contristatus. Mortuus enim est pater, et tanquam non est mortuus: similem enim reliquit post se (Eccli. XXX, 5, 4). Ecce propheta dicit sapientem filium hominis esse similem patri; et tu, hæretice, audes dicere ipsam Sapientiam, id est Dei Filium Patri esse dissimilem? Propheta dicit mortuum hominem patrem in eo quod filium similem reliquit, vivere in filio: et tu audes ipsam sempiternam Vitam, quod est Dei Filius, separare ab illo qui nunquam moritur Patre?
Tell me, heretic, you who dare to say that the Wisdom of God is less: tell me how great the height of heaven is, the breadth of the earth, the depth of the abyss. Count, if you can, the drops of rain, the sand of the sea, and the days of the age; show me even the number of your hairs, since “all the hairs of your head are numbered”; explain these small lower things, and then I will believe that you can search out the higher. But you cannot, you are not able. The Spirit of God convicts you, who foresaw you heretics long ago. For those who wrote and understood what we said above were moved by the Spirit of truth, not of error. But you, heretic, though you cannot explain these things, dare to dispute about the very Wisdom of God, which cannot be searched out; and you think yourself great because you dispute with no one arguing against you and no judge presiding. And while the times favor your error, you think yourself something when you are nothing: seduced, you long to seduce many, some by money, some by power; you gather to yourself such people, so as to destroy very many with you. This labor of yours is not useful for salvation but rather for ruin. For by teaching such things, or rather not teaching but blaspheming, you are shown to do injury not to some powerful man but to God the Father himself in his Son. “The Father is greater, the Son is less; the Father is better, the Son inferior.” Not even any wise man would gladly accept such insults, who strives to have a son better than himself or equal. Hence that prophetic saying too: “The father rejoiced in a wise son; he saw it in his life, and at his death he was not grieved. For the father is dead, and it is as though he were not dead; for he has left one like himself behind him.” See, the prophet says that the wise son of a man is like his father; and do you, heretic, dare to say that Wisdom itself, that is, the Son of God, is unlike the Father? The prophet says that a man who dies lives in his son because he left a son like himself; and do you dare to separate eternal Life itself, which is the Son of God, from the Father, who never dies?
Matt 10:30 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The Arian who cannot count the raindrops or his own hairs presumes to dispute about God’s Wisdom and calls the Son less, though even a wise man rejoices to leave a son like himself.
- Polemic against Arians: translated as written. The phrase “while the times favor your error” probably refers to Arian (Vandal) rule in Africa. The “prophetic saying” is Sir 30:4–5 (cited by Migne as Eccli. 30:5, 4).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's marginal heading removed; OCR slip; OCR slip in Migne's reference): Contra Arianos. → ; Dic milii, hæeretice → Dic mihi, hæretice; dic milii, altitudo → dic mihi, altitudo; are nam → arenam; non polos → non potes; le convincit → te convincit; Qui euim ista quæ supcrins → Qui enim ista quæ superius; veiitatis → veritatis; vidcris, qnia → videris, quia; errori luo, existimis → errori tuo, existimas; seducitis inultos → seductus multos; lecum perdas → tecum perdas; libi labor → tibi labor; blaspliemando → blasphemando; ipsi Den Patri → ipsi Deo Patri; minor csl Filius: melior cst → minor est Filius: melior est; cuntendit. Undc → contendit. Unde; dicium → dictum; non eat contristatus. Mortuus enim eat → non est contristatus. Mortuus enim est; (Eccti. xxx, 5, 4) → (Eccli. XXX, 5, 4); morinum → mortuum; lilio → filio; quod cst Dei Filius, scparare → quod est Dei Filius, separare.
Extrabiblical texts: Sir 1:2-3 (Sirach [in RC, EO, ETH canons]; allusion); Sir 30:4-5 (Sirach [in RC, EO, ETH canons]; quotation)
Topics: Trinity, Heresy, Arianism
Cite (SBL): Quodvultdeus, Iud. pag. Ar. 7 (PL 42:1121; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/quodvultdeus-contra-iudaeos/7). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/quodvultdeus-contra-iudaeos/7
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-quodvultdeus-contra-iudaeos-7) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text, badly damaged in places; Migne's notes, headings and admonitions removed by logged corrections; some restored readings marked conjectural). No public-domain or FOTC English exists; re-read against the Latin.
Chapter 8
8PL 42:1121
Et quid, inquis, facturus sum? Ipse dixit, Pater major me est ( Joan. xiv, 28). Quia non intelligis, ideo tibi male sonat quod bene dixit. Nam ipse dixit; imo et confirmavit. Prorsus ipse dixit. Pater major me est: ipse Filius dixit. Sed vide quando hoc dixit: in susceptione humanæ naturae positus hoc dixit. Tunc dixit, Pater major me est quando dixit, Tristis est anima mea usque ad mortem (Matth. XXVI, 38). Tunc dixit, Pater major me est, quando flevit, quando lassatus est, quando esurivit, quando sitivit. Tunc dixit, Pater major me est, quando eum dicit Scriptum minoratum paulo minus ab Angelis (Psal. VIII, 6). Numquid enim etiam hic insana superbia ita irreverens progreditur vestra, ut Verbum Dei manens apud Patrem, audeat in ipsa illa divinitate dicere Angelis esse minorem? Si non audes, hæretice, hoc dicere, serva hos gradus, et pereat error tuus: Filius apud Patrem, et cum Patre æqualis, quoniam sempiternus cum sempiterno, semper manens cum semper manente: æqualis missus, et veniens: in susceptione hominis minor, non solum Patre, verum etiam Angelis: æqualis in forma Dei, minor in forma servi: aequalis cum Patre creans Angelos; minor Patre homines faciens angelos: æqualis cum Patre novum construens mundum; minor Patre perditum reparans mundum: æqualis cum Patre vitam largiens æternam; minor Patre mortem suscipiens nostram.
“And what,” you say, “am I to do? He himself said, ‘The Father is greater than I.’” Because you do not understand, what he said well sounds ill to you. For he himself said it; indeed he even confirmed it. Certainly he himself said, “The Father is greater than I”: the Son himself said it. But see when he said it: he said it as one who had taken up human nature. He said “The Father is greater than I” then, when he said, “My soul is sorrowful even to death.” He said “The Father is greater than I” then, when he wept, when he was weary, when he hungered, when he thirsted. He said “The Father is greater than I” then, when Scripture says that he was made a little less than the angels. Does your mad pride go so far in irreverence as to dare to say that the Word of God, abiding with the Father, is less than the angels in that very divinity? If you do not dare to say this, heretic, keep these degrees, and let your error perish. The Son with the Father, and equal with the Father, because eternal with the eternal, always abiding with him who always abides: equal when sent and when coming; less, in taking up man, not only than the Father but even than the angels; equal in the form of God, less in the form of a servant; equal with the Father in creating angels, less than the Father in making men angels; equal with the Father in building a new world, less than the Father in restoring the lost world; equal with the Father in granting eternal life, less than the Father in taking up our death.
John 14:28 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 26:38 (quotation, high confidence) · John 11:35 (allusion, medium confidence) · John 4:6 (allusion, medium confidence) · Matt 4:2 (allusion, medium confidence) · John 19:28 (allusion, medium confidence) · Ps 8:5 (8:6 Vulg.) (allusion, high confidence) · Heb 2:9 (allusion, medium confidence) · Phil 2:6–7 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 20:36 (echo, low confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Christ’s words “The Father is greater than I” refer to his human nature, in which he was less even than the angels, while in the form of God he is equal to the Father.
- Anti-Arian argument: translated as written. Ps 8:6 Vulgate = 8:5 English (cf. Heb 2:7, 9). The pairing “equal in creating angels, less in making men angels” plays on the hope of equality with the angels (Luke 20:36).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's marginal heading removed; OCR slip; OCR slip; footnote marker removed; footnote marker removed): Æqualitas personarum. → ; Qnia non → Quia non; Filins dixit → Filius dixit; Patermajor → Pater major; anc dixit → Tunc dixit; lassatus cst → lassatus est; ilia divinitate → illa divinitate; Si hou audes, hareiicc, hoc dicere, serva hos gradus, et pcri error → Si non audes, hæretice, hoc dicere, serva hos gradus, et pereat error; seinpiterno, semper manens cum senipcr manente: æqua- iis missus, ct vcnicus → sempiterno, semper manens cum semper manente: æqualis missus, et veniens; minor1, non → minor, non; horula Dci → forma Dei; mun- dum1; → mundum;.
Topics: Christology, Trinity, Heresy
Cite (SBL): Quodvultdeus, Iud. pag. Ar. 8 (PL 42:1121; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/quodvultdeus-contra-iudaeos/8). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/quodvultdeus-contra-iudaeos/8
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-quodvultdeus-contra-iudaeos-8) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text, badly damaged in places; Migne's notes, headings and admonitions removed by logged corrections; some restored readings marked conjectural). No public-domain or FOTC English exists; re-read against the Latin.
Chapter 9
9PL 42:1121
Hunc itaque Filium credimus Dei in susceptione hominis minorem, in divinitate Patri æqualem, factum, sicut Apostolus dicit, ex semine David secundum carnem (Rom. 1, 3). Ex semine enim David virgo Maria, qua de Spiritu sancto concipiente, et in cujus utero Verbum carne suscepta, nobis factus est mediator homo totus et Deus (I Tim. II, 5), Verbum et anima, et caro unus Christus. Hoc quippe nobis etiam ordo hujus sacramenti declarat, quod posteaquam credimus in Deum Patrem omnipotentem, credimus et in Filium ejus Jesum Christum, de Spiritu sancto natum ex virgine Maria. Et hæc nativitas perturbat omnem cogitationem humanam; quoniam virtus est eam operata dIvina. Nam quando admittit ratio nostrae generationis, ut virgo concipiens, virgo post partum permanens, Filius videatur, et integritas inviolata servetur? Hoc non potest implere quilibet homo natus: ille autem potuit, quia non erat solus homo, sed Deus et homo; qui propterea voluit nasci homo, quia perierat omnis homo. Primum itaque miraculum magnum hujus Mediatoris ac singulare fuit, quod sic natus est: ut ille qui veniebat multos docere facere miracula, quæ ipse per se et per illos faciebat, haberet tamen aliquid proprium qui nihil usurpaverat alienum. Solus enim de virgine natus est, quia solus sine amplexu maris et feminæ de Spiritu sancto conceptus est: solus sine corruptione implevit uterum matris, quia solus pro nobis super cœlos ascendit, ut sederet ad dexteram Patris. Acceperunt ab illo discipuli ut facerent multa et magna miracula, et fecerunt: nec tamen quispiam prædicantur aut creditur de virgine natus, aut de Spiritu sancto conceptus, nisi ille unus qui creator temporum inventus in tempore est etiam ipse creatus, suscipiens quam integram formaverat humanam naturam, ut per ipsam quodam modo redemptor nostram repararet ruinam. Et hic Dei Filius, et hominis filius; Dei Filius in corde Patris, hominis filius in utero matris: idem ipse unus Christus, qui processit ex utero virginali tanquam sponsus de thalamo suo (Psal. XVIII, 6). In quo utero spirituales nuptiæ sunt celebratæ, Deusque conjunctus est carni, et caro cohæsit Deo, ut esset unus Christus Deus et homo.
We believe, then, that this Son of God is less in taking up man, equal to the Father in divinity, made, as the Apostle says, of the seed of David according to the flesh. For the virgin Mary was of the seed of David; she conceived by the Holy Spirit, and in her womb, when the Word had taken flesh, he became for us the mediator, wholly man and God: Word and soul and flesh, one Christ. The order of this sacrament makes this plain to us too, for after we believe in God the Father almighty, we believe also in his Son Jesus Christ, born of the Holy Spirit from the virgin Mary. And this birth confounds all human thinking, because it was worked by divine power. For when does the law of our generation allow that a virgin should conceive, should remain a virgin after giving birth, that a Son should be seen and her integrity be kept inviolate? No man born can accomplish this; but he could, because he was not man only, but God and man; and he willed to be born a man for this reason, that every man had perished. So the first great and unique miracle of this Mediator was that he was born so: that he who came to teach many to work miracles, which he worked both by himself and through them, should yet have something of his own, he who had usurped nothing belonging to another. For he alone was born of a virgin, because he alone was conceived by the Holy Spirit without the embrace of man and woman; he alone filled his mother’s womb without corruption, because he alone ascended above the heavens for us, to sit at the right hand of the Father. The disciples received from him the power to work many great miracles, and they worked them; yet none of them is preached or believed to have been born of a virgin or conceived by the Holy Spirit, except that one who, the creator of the times, was found in time and himself created, taking up the human nature which he had formed whole, so that through it he might as redeemer in some manner repair our ruin. And he is both Son of God and son of man: Son of God in the Father’s heart, son of man in his mother’s womb; one and the same Christ, who came forth from the virginal womb like a bridegroom from his chamber. In that womb a spiritual marriage was celebrated: God was joined to flesh, and flesh clung to God, so that there might be one Christ, God and man.
Rom 1:3 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Tim 2:5 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 1:35 (allusion, high confidence) · Ps 19:5 (18:6 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The Son, equal to the Father in divinity, was born of the Virgin Mary by the Holy Spirit, a unique miracle in which God and flesh were joined in one Christ.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's marginal heading removed; OCR slip; OCR slip; footnote marker removed; OCR slip; stray mark removed): Christi nativitas. → ; ilaque → itaque; susceptn → suscepta; lotus et Deus → totus et Deus; sacra- menti → sacramenti; Christum I, de Spiritu sancto natum cx → Christum, de Spiritu sancto natum ex; cogitationcm → cogitationem; snlus homo, sed Deus ei horto → solus homo, sed Deus et homo; pcrierat → perierat; faccre → facere; taincn → tamen; nibil usurpaverat alicnum → nihil usurpaverat alienum; maris ct feminæ → maris et feminæ; solos pro nobis super coelus → solus pro nobis super cœlos; ab illu discipuli → ab illo discipuli; feccriuil → fecerunt; ant creditur → aut creditur; quan integram → quam integram; redemptor 3 nosiram → redemptor nostram; idcm ipsc → idem ipse; dc thalamo suo (Psal. XVIII, G) → de thalamo suo (Psal. XVIII, 6); cohæsit Ico → cohæsit Deo.
Topics: Christology, Incarnation, Mary, mother of Jesus
Cite (SBL): Quodvultdeus, Iud. pag. Ar. 9 (PL 42:1121; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/quodvultdeus-contra-iudaeos/9). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/quodvultdeus-contra-iudaeos/9
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-quodvultdeus-contra-iudaeos-9) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text, badly damaged in places; Migne's notes, headings and admonitions removed by logged corrections; some restored readings marked conjectural). No public-domain or FOTC English exists; re-read against the Latin.
Chapter 10
10PL 42:1121–1134
Hinc ergo procedens velut sponsus de thalamo suo, ad cujus nuptias commota universa exsultare visa est creatura. Namque angelorum chorus ex his nuptiis pacem designat hominibus bonæ voluntatis: quia qui erat Dei Filius, factus est et hominis Filius; suscipiens quod non erat, non amittens quod erat. His nuptiis cœli novam stellam, novum atque splendidum lumen illo ipso sponso in se operante producunt, ut lumen verum sedentibus in umbra mortis nuntiarent natum, et veluti lingua sua laudarent hunc sponsum procedentem, quem sciebant ad hoc suscepisse hominum mortalem, ut faceret immortalem. Ad hunc sponsum Magi ab extremo terræ veniunt, commoniti requirunt, vocati munera offerunt, infantem natum necdum quidem videntes, sed stella indice regem adorare cupientes. Ex his nuptiis regis nati turbatus Herodes, perturbati et Judæi regem totius creaturæ non intelligentes; quærit Herodes quem audit regem natum infantem perdere, ne illo crescente posset regnum amittere; Judæi nolentes habere Dei Filium regem, ubi Christus nasceretur Herodi produnt, atque de unius infantis nece utrorumque voluntas astringitur. Postquam Herodes Judæis narrantibus didicit, ubi Christus occidendus posset inveniri, vocans ad se Magos, tempus ab eis inquisivit stellæ, missisque in Bethlehem ait: Ite, diligenter inquirite de puero, ut et ego veniens adorem eum (Matth. II, 8). O labia dolosa! utquid in corde et corde loqueris mala? Aliud enim habet tua lingua, aliud clamat conscientia. Te ipsum decipis talia cogitando, erras, fallis et falleris. Frustra in malo vigilat falsitas: non a te, sicut decet, inquiritur veritas. Ecce audiunt te Magi, aliud quidem foris dicentem, sed nesciunt te intus aliud cogitantem, et pergunt ita ut ad te amplius non revertantur. Ille enim eos admonebat, qui insipientiam tuam deridens, hoc Magos facere praecepit quod rex jusserat verus, non quod subdole persuaserat falsus. Per aliam, inquit Evangelista, viam regressi sunt in regionem suam (lbid., 12). Verum cum a Magis te delusum sensisses, Herodes, voluisti omnes infantes terræ illius perdere, ut unum quem quærebas posses occidere. Sed ille sponsus noster, qui processit de thalamo suo, ut ex ore infantium et lactentium perficeret laudem, sivit te implere voluntatem tuam, ut ætas quæ lingua propria Christum non poterat confiteri, testimonio mortis suæ confiteretur, et crudelitas immanis demonstraretur tua, et ad nuptias cœlestis sponsi infantium congregaretur turba. Dic, Herodes, si te Christus ideo offendit, quia ejus Magis annuntiantibus audisti regnum; quid te offenderunt hi qui tecum adversus Christum sentiebant principes Judæorum, quorum filios interficiens ipsos magis atrocissima poena in suis filiis afflixisti? Nam Christum minime invenire potuisti. Sed quid tecum diutius agam? Ipsos, ipsos conveniam Judæos, qui dum infantem Christum noluerunt agnoscere, filios suos cum illo compulsi sunt amittere: quos quidem occidit mortique propinavit Herodes vester amicus; sed his mortalitatem æternamque vitam donavit Christus, quem vestrum etiam nunc dicitis inimicum.
From there, then, he came forth like a bridegroom from his chamber, and at his wedding the whole creation was seen to be moved and to exult. For the choir of angels proclaims from this wedding peace to men of good will: because he who was Son of God became also Son of man, taking up what he was not, not losing what he was. For this wedding the heavens, as the bridegroom himself worked in them, brought forth a new star, a new and splendid light, so as to announce the true light to those sitting in the shadow of death, and, as it were with their own tongue, to praise this bridegroom coming forth, whom they knew to have taken up mortal man so as to make him immortal. To this bridegroom the Magi come from the end of the earth; warned, they seek him; called, they offer gifts, not yet seeing the newborn infant, but longing, with the star as guide, to adore the king. At this wedding of the newborn king Herod was troubled, and the Jews were troubled too, not understanding the king of all creation. Herod seeks to destroy the one he hears is born an infant king, lest he lose his kingdom as the child grows; the Jews, unwilling to have the Son of God as king, betray to Herod where Christ was to be born; and the will of both is bound together in the death of one infant. After Herod had learned from the Jews’ account where Christ could be found to be killed, he called the Magi to him, inquired of them the time of the star, and sending them to Bethlehem said: “Go, search diligently for the child, that I too may come and adore him.” O deceitful lips! Why do you speak evil with a double heart? Your tongue has one thing, your conscience cries out another. You deceive yourself in thinking such things; you err, you deceive and are deceived. In vain does falsehood keep watch for evil; the truth is not sought by you as it should be. See, the Magi hear you saying one thing outwardly, but they do not know that you are thinking another within, and they go on so as never to return to you. For he warned them who, mocking your folly, bade the Magi do what the true king had commanded, not what the false king had craftily urged. “By another way,” says the Evangelist, “they returned to their own country.” But when you saw, Herod, that you had been fooled by the Magi, you wanted to destroy all the infants of that land so as to kill the one you were seeking. But our bridegroom, who came forth from his chamber to perfect praise from the mouth of infants and sucklings, let you carry out your will, so that an age which could not confess Christ with its own tongue might confess him by the testimony of its death, and your monstrous cruelty might be shown, and a crowd of infants might be gathered to the wedding of the heavenly bridegroom. Tell us, Herod: if Christ offended you because you heard from the Magi’s announcement of his kingdom, how had these leaders of the Jews offended you, who sided with you against Christ? By killing their sons you afflicted them rather with the most cruel punishment in their sons, for Christ you could not find at all. But why should I deal with you any longer? I will address the Jews themselves, the Jews themselves, who, when they refused to acknowledge the infant Christ, were forced to lose their own sons with him. Herod, your friend, killed them and handed them over to death; but Christ, whom you even now call your enemy, gave them immortality and eternal life.
Ps 19:5 (18:6 Vulg.) (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 2:14 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 2:2 (allusion, high confidence) · Isa 9:2 (allusion, medium confidence) · Matt 2:3–7 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 2:8 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 12:2 (11:3 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 2:12 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 2:16 (allusion, high confidence) · Ps 8:2 (8:3 Vulg.) (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: At Christ’s birth angels and a star rejoiced and the Magi adored him, while Herod and the Jewish leaders plotted his death and Herod killed the infants, whom Christ received into eternal life.
- The sermon turns here to polemic against the Jews: translated as written. The printed “filios suus cum illo” (“their own sons with him”) is taken by sense; Christ was not killed with the infants, and the meaning is “on his account”.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's marginal heading removed; OCR slip; OCR slip; footnote marker removed; footnote marker removed): Crudelitas Herodis. → ; suscipieris → suscipiens; Ilis nuptiis cœli novam stecilam → His nuptiis cœli novam stellam; nuntiarent namm, ct → nuntiarent natum, et; scie- bant → sciebant; ter. ræ → terræ; ædorare * → adorare; rcgis nati turbatus Hcrodes → regis nati turbatus Herodes; Herodcs → Herodes; nolenles → nolentes; uhi Christus nasceretut → ubi Christus nasceretur; utrorum - que → utrorumque; Judais narrantibus didicit, uhi Chritus → Judæis narrantibus didicit, ubi Christus; ah cis inquisi- vit → ab eis inquisivit; 0 labia dolosa 1 utquid → O labia dolosa! utquid; Talleris → falleris; falsitas1: → falsitas:; uon revertantur. Ille euim → non revertantur. Ille enim; insipientiam luam → insipientiam tuam; nou quod → non quod; le delnsum → te delusum; infanles terr;c → infantes terræ; perliceret landem → perficeret laudem; confileri → confiteri; immanis 2 → immanis; si tc Christus → si te Christus; annun- hiatibus → annuntiantibus; senliebanl → sentiebant; uoluerunt → noluerunt; suus cum illo3 → suos cum illo; vitali donavit → vitam donavit.
Topics: Christology, Martyrdom, Incarnation
Cite (SBL): Quodvultdeus, Iud. pag. Ar. 10 (PL 42:1121–1134; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/quodvultdeus-contra-iudaeos/10). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/quodvultdeus-contra-iudaeos/10
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-quodvultdeus-contra-iudaeos-10) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text, badly damaged in places; Migne's notes, headings and admonitions removed by logged corrections; some restored readings marked conjectural). No public-domain or FOTC English exists; re-read against the Latin.
Chapter 11
11PL 42:1134
Vos, inquam, convenio, o Judæi, qui usque in hodiernum diem negatis Filium Dei. Nonne vox vestra illa est, quando eum videbatis miracula facientem, atque tentantes dicebatis, Quousque animas nostras suspendis? Si tu es Christus, dic nobis palam. Ille autem ad considerationem miraculorum vos mittebat dicens, Opera quæ ego facio, ipsa testimonium de me perhibent (Joan. x. 24, 25): ut Christo testimonium dicerent, non verba, sed facta. Vos autem non agnoscentes Salvatorem, qui operabatur salutem in medio terræ vestræ (Psal. LXXIII, 12), adjicientes in malo dixistis, Tu de te ipso testimonium dicis, testimonium tuum non est verum. Sed ad hæc ille quid vobis responderit, advertere noluistis. Nonne scriptum est, inquit, in Lege vestra, quod duorum hominum verum sit testimonium (Joan. VIII, 13, 17)? Prævaricatores Legis, intendite Legem. Testimonium quæritis de Christo: in Lege vestra scriptum est, quod duorum hominum testimonium verum sit ( Deut. XVII, 6; xix, 15); procedant de Lege vestra, non tantum duo, sed etiam plures testes Christi, et convincant auditores Legis, nec factores. Dic, Isaia, testimonium Christo. Ecce, inquit, virgo in utero concipiet et pariet filium, et vocabitis nomen ejus Emmanuel, quod est interpretatum, Nobiscum Deus (Isai. VII, 14). Accedat et alius testis: dic et tu, Jeremia, testimonium Christo. Hic est, inquit, Deus noster, et non æstimabitur alius absque illo, qui invenit omnem viam scientiæ, et dedit eam Jacob puero suo et Israel dilecto suo. Post hæc in terris visus est, et cum hominibus conversatus est (Baruch III, 36-38). Ecce duo testes idonei ex Lege vestra, ex quorum testimonio non sunt compuncta corda vestra.
You, I say, I address, O Jews, who to this day deny the Son of God. Was not yours that voice, when you saw him working miracles and said, testing him, “How long will you keep our souls in suspense? If you are the Christ, tell us plainly”? But he sent you to consider the miracles, saying, “The works that I do bear witness about me,” so that not words but deeds might bear witness to Christ. But you, not recognizing the Savior who was working salvation in the midst of your land, added to your evil and said, “You bear witness about yourself; your testimony is not true.” But what he answered you to this you refused to heed. “Is it not written,” he says, “in your Law, that the testimony of two men is true?” Transgressors of the Law, attend to the Law. You seek testimony about Christ: in your Law it is written that the testimony of two men is true. Let not two only but many witnesses to Christ come forward from your Law, and convict the hearers of the Law who are not doers. Isaiah, bear witness to Christ. “Behold,” he says, “a virgin shall conceive in her womb and bear a son, and you shall call his name Emmanuel,” which is interpreted, “God with us.” Let another witness come forward: you too, Jeremiah, bear witness to Christ. “This is our God,” he says, “and no other shall be reckoned beside him, who found every way of knowledge and gave it to Jacob his servant and Israel his beloved. After this he was seen on earth and lived among men.” See, two competent witnesses from your Law, by whose testimony your hearts have not been pierced.
John 10:24–25 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 74:12 (73:12 Vulg.) (allusion, high confidence) · John 8:13 (quotation, high confidence) · John 8:17 (quotation, high confidence) · Deut 17:6 (allusion, high confidence) · Deut 19:15 (allusion, high confidence) · Rom 2:13 (echo, medium confidence) · Isa 7:14 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 1:23 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The preacher summons witnesses from the Jews’ own Law and prophets to Christ, beginning with Isaiah’s virgin and the passage he attributes to Jeremiah on God seen on earth.
- Anti-Jewish polemic in the form of a summons of witnesses: translated as written. The passage attributed to Jeremiah is Baruch 3:36–38, which Latin writers often cited under Jeremiah’s name.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's marginal heading removed; OCR slip; OCR slip in Migne's reference): Contra Judæos, ex Isaia et Jeremia. → ; o Juda i, → o Judæi,; ilia est → illa est; terre vestre (Psal. LInIrI, 12), adjicientes in nialo aistis → terræ vestræ (Psal. LXXIII, 12), adjicientes in malo dixistis; tuum non eat verum. Sed ad hrc → tuum non est verum. Sed ad hæc; verum ait testimonium → verum sit testimonium; vesu-a → vestra; nee tactores → nec factores; Emnumuel → Emmanuel; Hic eat, inquit, Deus Noster → Hic est, inquit, Deus noster; onem viam → omnem viam; dedil eam → dedit eam; Post hac → Post hæc; (Baruch III, 5b 58) → (Baruch III, 36-38).
Extrabiblical texts: Bar 3:36-38 (Baruch [in RC, EO, ETH canons]; quotation)
Topics: Christology, Prophecy and fulfilment
Cite (SBL): Quodvultdeus, Iud. pag. Ar. 11 (PL 42:1134; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/quodvultdeus-contra-iudaeos/11). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/quodvultdeus-contra-iudaeos/11
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-quodvultdeus-contra-iudaeos-11) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text, badly damaged in places; Migne's notes, headings and admonitions removed by logged corrections; some restored readings marked conjectural). No public-domain or FOTC English exists; re-read against the Latin.
Chapter 12
12PL 42:1134
Sed alii atque alii ex Lege Christi testes introducantur, ut frontes durissimæ inimicorum conterantur. Veniat et ille Daniel sanctus, juvenis quidem ætate, senior vero scientia ac mansuetudine, convincat omnes falsos testes: sicut convicit seniores impudicos ( Dan. XIII, 47), ita suo testimonio Christi conterat inimicos. Dic, sancte Daniel, dic de Christo quod nosti. Cum venerit, inquit, Sanctus sanctorum, cessabit unctio (Id. IX, 24). Quare illo præsente cui insultantes dicebatis, Tu de te ipse testimonium dicis, testimonium tuum non est verum (Joan. VIII, 13), cessavit unctio vestra, nisi quia ipse est qui venerat Sanctus sanctorum? Si, ut vos dicitis, nondum venit, sed exspectatur ut veniat Sanctus sanctorum, demonstrate unctionem: si autem, quod verum est, cessavit unctio vestra, agnoscite venisse Sanctum sanctorum. Ipse est enim et lapis ille abscissus de monte sine manibus concidentium, id est, Christus natus de virgine sine manibus complectentium: qui tantum crevit, ut mons magnus fieret, et impleret universam faciem terræ (Dan. II, 34, 35). De quo monte dicit propheta. Venite ascendamus in montem Domini (Isai. II, 3). Et de quo David dicit, Mons Dei, mons uber: utquid suspicamini montes incaseatos, montem in quo placuit Deo habitare in ipso (Psal. LXVII, 16, 17)? Cum enim ipse Dominus Christus discipulos suos interrogaret, quem eum dicerent esse homines Filium hominis; responderunt: Alii Eliam, alii Jeremiam, alii Joannem Baptistam, aut unum ex Prophetis (Matth. xvi, 14). Et ille: Utquid suspicamini montes incaseatos, montem in quo placuit Deo habitare in ipso? Hunc agnovit Petrus dicens, Tu es Christus Filius Dei vivi (Ibid., 17). Agnovit montem, et ascendit in montem: testimonium dixit Veritati, et dilectus est a Veritate. Supra petram fundatus est Petrus, ut mortem susciperet illum amando, quem ter negaverat timendo.
But let more and more witnesses to Christ be brought in from the Law, so that the hardest brows of his enemies may be broken. Let that holy Daniel come too, a youth in age but an elder in knowledge and gentleness, and convict all false witnesses: as he convicted the unchaste elders, so let him break the enemies of Christ with his testimony. Speak, holy Daniel, tell what you know of Christ. “When the Holy of holies comes,” he says, “anointing will cease.” Why, once he was present to whom you said insultingly, “You bear witness about yourself; your testimony is not true,” did your anointing cease, unless because he is the one who had come, the Holy of holies? If, as you say, the Holy of holies has not yet come but is awaited, show us the anointing; but if, as is true, your anointing has ceased, acknowledge that the Holy of holies has come. For he is that stone cut from the mountain without the hands of hewers, that is, Christ born of a virgin without the hands of those who embrace; who grew so much that he became a great mountain and filled the whole face of the earth. Of this mountain the prophet says, “Come, let us go up to the mountain of the Lord.” And of it David says, “The mountain of God, a fertile mountain: why do you suspect curdled mountains, the mountain in which it pleased God to dwell?” For when the Lord Christ himself asked his disciples whom men said that he, the Son of man, was, they answered: “Some Elijah, some Jeremiah, some John the Baptist, or one of the prophets.” And he answered: “Why do you suspect curdled mountains, the mountain in which it pleased God to dwell?” Peter recognized him, saying, “You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.” He recognized the mountain and went up the mountain; he bore witness to the Truth and was loved by the Truth. Peter was founded on the rock, so as to undergo death out of love for him whom he had once denied out of fear.
Dan 9:24 (quotation, high confidence) · John 8:13 (quotation, high confidence) · Dan 2:34–35 (allusion, high confidence) · Isa 2:3 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 68:15–16 (67:16-Ps Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 16:13–14 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 16:16 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 16:18 (allusion, medium confidence) · Matt 26:69–75 (allusion, medium confidence) · John 21:18–19 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Daniel testifies that anointing would cease when the Holy of holies came, and that the stone cut without hands would become a mountain, the Christ whom Peter confessed.
- The account of Daniel and the elders is Susanna (Dan 13 in the Latin Bible). “Montes incaseatos” (Ps 67:16–17 Vulgate, “curdled mountains”) follows the Old Latin/Vulgate wording; the preacher applies it to the various opinions about Jesus. The words “Why do you suspect …” are the preacher’s application, not a saying of Christ in the Gospel. The claim that the Jewish anointing ceased is the preacher’s polemical argument: translated as written.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's marginal heading removed; OCR slip; OCR slip in Migne's reference): Ex Daniele. → ; atate → ætate; siunt convicit → sicut convicit; dicebatis. Tu de te ipse testimonium dicis, testimonium tuum non eat → dicebatis, Tu de te ipse testimonium dicis, testimonium tuum non est; ipse cst qui → ipse est qui; enim ei lapis → enim et lapis; complecteutium → complectentium; incasealos → incaseatos; (Psal. LIVII, 16, 17) → (Psal. LXVII, 16, 17); BaptisMum → Baptistam; habitare in ipso' Hunc → habitare in ipso? Hunc; fumlatus → fundatus; tar negaverat → ter negaverat.
Extrabiblical texts: Sus 45-62 (Susanna [in RC, EO, ETH canons]; allusion)
Topics: Christology, Prophecy and fulfilment
Cite (SBL): Quodvultdeus, Iud. pag. Ar. 12 (PL 42:1134; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/quodvultdeus-contra-iudaeos/12). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/quodvultdeus-contra-iudaeos/12
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-quodvultdeus-contra-iudaeos-12) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text, badly damaged in places; Migne's notes, headings and admonitions removed by logged corrections; some restored readings marked conjectural). No public-domain or FOTC English exists; re-read against the Latin.