Sermons to the People 91.1–92.2
Latin text: PL 38 (Latin text: Migne, PL 38, digitized by Open Greek and Latin (patrologia_latina-dev, University of Leipzig), CC BY-SA 4.0).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0). Compare: NPNF 1/6: Sermons on Selected Lessons of the New Testament (R. G. MacMullen, ed., 1888).
Chapter 91
91.1PL 38:360
Interrogati Judæi, sicut nanc ex Evangelio, cum recitaretur, audivimus. quomodo esset Dominus noster Jesus Christus lilius David, quem Dominum suum dixerit ipse David, respondere non potucrunl. Iloc enim in Domino noverant, quod videbant. Apparebat enim eis filius hominis: occultus autem crat Filius Dei. Hinc est quod eum et superari posse crediderunt, et ligno suspensum irriserunt, dicentes: Si Filius Dei est, descendat de cruce, et credimus in eum.Aliud videbant, aliud non cognoscebant. Si eniin cognovissent, nunquam Dominum gloriæ crucifixissent. Sciebant tamen Christum filium David. Nam etiam nunc Ipsum sperant esse venturum. Latet cos quod venerit, sed volentes latet. Neque enim si pendentem non agnoverunt, et regnantem agnoscere non debucrunt. In cujus enim nomine vocantur et benedicuntur omnes gentes, nisi in ejus quem putant Christum non fuisse? Ipse enim filius David, utique ex semine David secundum carmem, filius est Abraham. Si autem dictum est ad Abraham, In semine tuo benedicentur onmes gentes ( Gen. XXII, 47), et vident jam in Christo nostro benedici omnes gentes; quid exspectant quod jam venit, et non timent quod venturum est? Lapidem enim se dixit ipse Dominus noster Jesus Christus, prophetico ad se asserendum utens testimonio. Lapidem autem talcm, ut si quis in cum offenderit, conquassetur; super quem autem lapis ille venerit, conterat eum. Quando enim in eum offenditur, humilis jacet: jacendo humilis quassat offendentem, veniendo excelsus conterit superbientem. Jam ergo Judæi illa offensione quassati sunt: restat ut ejus præclaro adventu etiam conterantur, nisi forte com vivant, agnoverint, ne moriantur. Patiens enini est Deus, et illos quotidie invitat ad fidem.
The Jews were asked, as we heard just now from the Gospel when it was read, how our Lord Jesus Christ was the son of David when David himself called him his Lord, and they could not answer. For they knew in the Lord what they saw. The son of man appeared to them; but the Son of God was hidden. That is why they believed he could be overcome, and mocked him when he hung on the tree, saying, “If he is the Son of God, let him come down from the cross, and we will believe in him.” One thing they saw; another they did not recognize. For if they had recognized it, they would never have crucified the Lord of glory. Yet they knew that the Christ was the son of David. For even now they hope that he will come. It is hidden from them that he has come; but it is hidden from them because they will it so. For even if they did not recognize him hanging on the cross, they ought to have recognized him reigning. In whose name are all the nations called and blessed, if not in his whom they think was not the Christ? For the son of David, being of the seed of David according to the flesh, is certainly the son of Abraham. And if it was said to Abraham, “In your seed all the nations will be blessed,” and they now see all nations blessed in our Christ, why do they wait for what has already come, and not fear what is still to come? For our Lord Jesus Christ himself said he was a stone, using a prophetic testimony to assert it of himself; and a stone of such a kind that if anyone stumbles against it he will be shattered, but on whomever that stone comes, it will crush him. For when he is stumbled against, he lies low: lying low he shatters the one who stumbles; coming on high he crushes the proud. The Jews, then, have already been shattered by that stumbling; it remains that they will be crushed at his glorious coming as well, unless perhaps while they are alive they recognize him, so as not to die. For God is patient, and invites them daily to faith.
Matt 22:41–46 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 27:42 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 2:8 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 1:3 (echo, medium confidence) · Gen 22:18 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 21:44 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 20:18 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The Jews could not explain how the Christ is both David’s son and David’s Lord because they saw only his humanity; they have stumbled on the stone and will be crushed at his coming unless they believe.
- The reading is Matt 22:41–46. The mockery at the cross: Matt 27:42. “Lord of glory”: 1 Cor 2:8. Promise to Abraham: Gen 22:18 (Migne’s reference “22, 47” is a misprint). The stone: Matt 21:44 (Luke 20:18), drawing on Ps 118:22 and Isa 8:14. Augustine’s words on the Jews are translated as written.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slips; stray footnote number and OCR slip): quid exspectant quod jam venit 1, 6t non timent → quid exspectant quod jam venit, et non timent; Quande euim in eum offenditur → Quando enim in eum offenditur.
Topics: Christology
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 91.1 (PL 38:360; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/91-1/#p-91-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-91-1) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
91.2PL 38:360
Sed eum Judaei respondere non possent Domino proponenti quæstionem et dicenti, cojus filium dicerent Christum; otque illi responderent, Filium David: addendo et proponendo, Quomodo ergo David in spiritu vocat eum Dominum, dicens: Dixit Dominus Domino meo, Sede ad dexteram meam, donec ponam inimicos tuos sub pedibus tuis? Si ergo David, inquit, in spiritu dicit eum Dominum, quomodo est filius ejus? Non dixit, Non est filius ejus; sed, Quomodo est filius ejus? Quomodo cum dicit, verbum quærentis est, non negantis: tanquam si hoc eiA diceret, Bene quidem dicitis Christum filium David, sed ipse David Dominuin eum dacit; quem dicit ille Dominum, quomodo est fiilus? Dicerent Judæi, si instructi essent fide Christiana, quam nos tenemus; si contra Evangelium corda non clauderent, si vitum spiritualem in se habere voluissent, responderent instructi ecclesia tica fide huic quæstioni et dicerent, Quoniam in principio erat Verbum, et Verbum erat apud Deum, et Deus erat Verbum: ecce quomodo est Dominus David. Sed quia Verbum caro factum eat, et habitavit in nobis (Joan. I, I, 14); ecce quomodo est lilius David. Sed nescientes obmutuerunt, nec ore saltem clauso aures aperuerunt, ut quod respondere non potuerunt interrogati, nossent educti.
But the Jews could not answer the Lord when he put the question to them and asked whose son they said the Christ was. And when they answered, “David’s son,” he added and put to them: “How then does David in the Spirit call him Lord, saying, ‘The Lord said to my Lord, Sit at my right hand, until I put your enemies under your feet’? If David, then,” he says, “in the Spirit calls him Lord, how is he his son?” He did not say, “He is not his son,” but, “How is he his son?” When he says “how,” it is the word of one asking, not of one denying; as if he were saying to them, “You say rightly that the Christ is the son of David; but David himself calls him Lord: how is he the son of one who calls him Lord?” If the Jews had been instructed in the Christian faith that we hold; if they did not close their hearts against the Gospel; if they had wished to have spiritual life in themselves, they would have answered this question, instructed in the church’s faith, and said: “Since ‘in the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God’: see how he is David’s Lord. But since ‘the Word became flesh and dwelt among us’: see how he is David’s son.” But not knowing, they fell silent; and they did not even, with closed mouths, open their ears, so as to learn by being taught what they could not answer when questioned.
Matt 22:42–45 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 110:1 (109:1 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · John 1:1 (quotation, high confidence) · John 1:14 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Christ asked how, not whether, he was David’s son; the church’s faith answers that as the Word he is David’s Lord and as the Word made flesh his son.
- Quotations: Matt 22:42–45 with Ps 110:1 (109:1 Vulg.); John 1:1, 14.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slips): DicerentJuda:i, si intructi essent → Dicerent Judæi, si instructi essent; huic quæstienit et dicerent → huic quæstioni et dicerent.
Topics: Christology
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 91.2 (PL 38:360; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/91-1/#p-91-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-91-2) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
91.3PL 38:360
Sed quia ma - gnum est nosse mysterium, quomodo sit Dominus David et filius David: quomodo sit nna persona homo et Deus: quomodo sit in forma hominis minor Patre, in forma Dei æqualis Patri: quomodo iterum dicit, et, Pater major me est (Joan. xtv, 23); et, Ego et Pater unum sumus: quia magnum est sacramentum, ut capi possit, mores informandi sunt. Indignis enim clausum est, promerentibus aperitur. Nec lapidcs, nec vectes, nec pugni, nec calces sunt quibus pulsamus ad Dominum. Vita pulsat, vitae aperitur. Corde petitur, corde qua'mur, Corde pulsatur, cordi aperitur. Cor autem hoc quod recte petit, recte pulsat et quærit, pium esse debet. Primo amare Deum gratis; hæc est cnim pietas: nec sibi extra illum ponere mercedem, quam exspectet ex illo. Illo enim ntelius est nihil. Et quid carum petit a Deo, cui Deus ipse vilis est? Terram dat, et gaudes, amator terræ, et factus terra. Si gaudes, quando dat terram; quanto amplius gaudere debes, cum se ipsum tibi dat, qui fecit coelum et terram? Gratis ergo amandus est Deus. Nam diabolus hoc sancto Job nescicns quid in illo intus ageretur, magnum crimen objecit, dicens: Numquidgrutis colit Job Deum?
But it is a great thing to know the mystery: how he is David’s Lord and David’s son; how one person is man and God; how in the form of man he is less than the Father, in the form of God equal to the Father; how he says again, “The Father is greater than I,” and, “I and the Father are one.” Because the mystery is great, conduct must be formed if it is to be grasped. It is shut to the unworthy, opened to the deserving. Not stones, nor bars, nor fists, nor heels are what we knock with at the Lord’s door. Life knocks, and to life it is opened. With the heart one asks, with the heart one seeks, with the heart one knocks; to the heart it is opened. But this heart, if it is to ask rightly, knock and seek rightly, must be godly: first, to love God freely, for that is godliness; and not to set for itself, apart from him, a reward to expect from him. For nothing is better than he. And what does he ask from God that he holds dear, to whom God himself is cheap? He gives earth, and you rejoice, lover of earth, you who have become earth. If you rejoice when he gives earth, how much more ought you to rejoice when he gives you himself, he who made heaven and earth? So God is to be loved freely. For the devil, not knowing what was going on inside holy Job, brought against him a great charge, saying, “Does Job worship God for nothing?”
John 14:28 (quotation, high confidence) · John 10:30 (quotation, high confidence) · Phil 2:6–7 (allusion, medium confidence) · Matt 7:7 (allusion, high confidence) · Job 1:9 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The mystery of Christ as God and man is opened only to a purified heart, one that loves God freely and seeks no reward but God himself.
- The opening words of the Latin, “Amare Deum gratis pietas est” (“To love God freely is godliness”), are Migne’s marginal heading left in the text; they are not translated separately. Quotations: John 14:28; John 10:30; Matt 7:7 (asking, seeking, knocking); Job 1:9.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's marginal heading left in the text; OCR slips; OCR slips and stray footnote number): Amare Deum gratis pietas cat. → ; quomodo ilcrum dicit 1, et, Pater major me eat → quomodo iterum dicit, et, Pater major me est; mores in(ormaudi sunt → mores informandi sunt; Graiis ergo amandus est Dens. → Gratis ergo amandus est Deus..
Topics: Christology
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 91.3 (PL 38:360; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/91-1/#p-91-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-91-3) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
91.4PL 38:360–361
Ergo si adversarius hoc objecit, timere debemus ne hoc nobis objiciatur. Com magno cnim calumnioso habemus negotium. Si quærit fingere quod non est, quanto magis objicere quod est? Gaudeamus tamen, quia talis est judcx, qui falli al accusatore nostro non potest. Nam si hominem haberemus judicem, huic quidquid vellet fingeret inimicus. Nemo est diabolo astutior ad fingendum. Nam et nunc omnia falsa crimina de sanctii ipse confingit. Sic suas criminationes valcre non posse apud Deum, inter homines illas spargit. Et hoc ei quid prodest, cum dicat Apostolus, Gloria nostro hæc est, testimonium conscientie nostræ? Putatis tamen quia ille falsa crimina nulla astutia confingit? Novit quid inde mali agat, nisi ei resistat vigilantia fidei. Ideo enim ct de bonis mala spargit, ut infirmi non putent aliquos esse bonos, et tradant se rapiendos Iibidinibus et dissipandos, dicentes apud se ipsos: Quis est enim qui servat mandatum Dei? aut quis est tui servat castitatem? Dum putat quia nemo, ipse fit nemo. Hoc ergo agit diabolus. Sed talis erat vir Job, de quo nibil posset confingere: nota enim erat ct nimis clara vita ejus. Sed quia multas habehat divitias, hoc objecit, quod et si esset, in corde esse posset, in monibus apparere non posset. Colebat Deum, faciebat eleemosynas; et quo corde faciebat, nemo scicbat, Hcc ipse diabolus: sed Deus noverat. Perbibet Deus testimonium servo suo: diabolus calumniatur servo Dei. Permittitur ille tentari, probatur Job, coufunditur diabolus. Invenitur Job gratis colere Deum, gratis diligere: non quia aliquid dedit, sed quia se ipsuM non abstulit. Ait enim: Dominus dedit, Dominus abstulit; sicul Domino placuit, ita factum est: sil nomen Domini benedictuni (Job. I). Ignis tentationis arcessit; sed aurum, non stipulam invenit: abstulit sordes, non convertit in cincrem.
So if the adversary brought this charge, we ought to fear that it may be brought against us. For we have to do with a great slanderer. If he tries to invent what is not, how much more will he charge us with what is? Yet let us rejoice, because our judge is such that he cannot be deceived by our accuser. For if we had a human judge, the enemy would invent whatever he liked before him. No one is more cunning at inventing than the devil. For even now he himself makes up all the false charges against the saints. Since his accusations can have no force before God, he spreads them among men. And what does this profit him, when the apostle says, “This is our glory, the testimony of our conscience”? Do you think, though, that there is no cunning in his inventing false charges? He knows what harm he does by it, unless the vigilance of faith resists him. For he spreads evil reports even about the good so that the weak may think no one is good, and may give themselves up to be carried off and squandered by lusts, saying within themselves, “Who is there that keeps God’s commandment? Or who is there that keeps chastity?” While he thinks that no one does, he himself becomes no one. This, then, is what the devil does. But Job was such a man that nothing could be invented about him: his life was known and exceedingly plain. But because he had great riches, the devil charged him with something which, even if it were so, could be in the heart but could not appear in his conduct. He worshipped God, he gave alms; and with what heart he did it, no one knew, not even the devil himself; but God knew. God bears witness to his servant; the devil slanders the servant of God. He is allowed to be tempted; Job is proved, the devil is put to shame. Job is found to worship God freely, to love him freely: not because God gave something, but because God did not take himself away. For he says, “The Lord gave, the Lord has taken away; as it pleased the Lord, so it was done; blessed be the name of the Lord.” The fire of temptation came; but it found gold, not straw: it removed the dross; it did not turn it to ash.
2 Cor 1:12 (quotation, high confidence) · Job 1:8–12 (allusion, high confidence) · Job 1:21 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The devil slanders even the good to make the weak despair of virtue, but in Job’s case his charge failed, for Job proved that he loved God freely.
- The opening words “Quare de bonis spargat mala” (“Why he spreads evil reports of the good”) are Migne’s marginal heading left in the text; not translated. Quotations: 2 Cor 1:12; Job 1:21. Job: Job 1–2.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's marginal heading left in the text; OCR slips; stray footnote number; stray mark): Quare de bonis spargat mala. → ; Gaudeamus tamen *, quia → Gaudeamus tamen, quia; Sic silas crimiuationes → Sic suas criminationes; Permittitur ille tentari 1, probatur → Permittitur ille tentari, probatur.
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 91.4 (PL 38:360–361; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/91-1/#p-91-4). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-91-4) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
91.5PL 38:361
Quia ergo ad sacramentum Dei intelligendum, quomodo Christus et homo ct Deus sit, cor mundandum est; mundatur autem moribus, vita, eastitate, sanctitate, dilectione, ct lide quas per dilectionem operatur (hoc autem quod loquor, totum tanquam arborest, quæ radicem habet in corde: neque enim facta procedunt nisi de cordis radice; ubi si plantaveris cupiditatem, spinæ procedunt; si plantaveris charilatem ', fructus procedunt): statim Dominus post istam quæstionem propositam Judaeis, illis respondere non valentibus, subjecit de moribus loqui, ut ostenderet quare illi indigni fuerint intelligere quod interrogavit. Miseri enim superbi cum respondere non possent, utique debuerunt diccre: Nescimus nos; Magister, dic nobis. Obmutuerunt in propositione, nee os aperuerunt ad inquisitionem. Et statim Dominus de superbia illorum: Cavete, inquit, ab Scribis, qui amant præsidere in synagogis, et diligunt primum locum in convitiis. Non quia accipiunt, sed quia diligunt. mic cnim cor eorum accusavit, Accusator autem cordis esse non posset, nisi cordis inspector. Oportet enim ut servo Dei habenti aliquem bonorem in Ecclesia deferatur primus locas: quia si non deferatur, malum cst illi qui non defert: non tamen bonum est ilii cui defertur. Oportet itaque ut in congregatione Christianorum praepositi plebis eminentius sedeant, ut ipsa scde distinguantur, et eorum officium salis appareat: non tamen ut inflentur de sede; sed ut cogitent sarcinam unde sunt reddituri rationem. Quis autem novit, utrum hoc ament, aut non amenl? Res ista cordis est, judicem habere non potest nisi Deum. Ipse autem Dominus admonebat suos, ne inciderent in talc fermentum: quod alio loco dicit, Cavete a fermento Pharisæorum et Sadducworum. Et cum putarent illi propterea hoc eum dicere, quia panes non intulerant; respondit cis: Excidit vobis, quot millia saturati sunt ex quinque nanibus? Tunc intellexerunt, inquit, quia fermentum doctrinam eorum dicebat.. Amabant enim illi ista temporalia: æterna vero nec timebant mala, lice diligebant bona. Clauso corde intelligere non poterant quod Dominus interrogavit.
So, since the heart must be cleansed in order to understand God’s mystery, how Christ is both man and God; and it is cleansed by conduct, by life, by chastity, by holiness, by love, and by faith that works through love (and all that I am saying is like a tree that has its root in the heart: for deeds come only from the heart’s root; if you have planted desire there, thorns come up; if you have planted love, fruits come up): immediately after the Lord had put this question to the Jews, and they could not answer, he went on to speak about conduct, to show why they were unworthy to understand what he asked. For the wretched proud men, since they could not answer, certainly ought to have said, “We do not know; Master, tell us.” They fell silent at the question, and did not open their mouths to inquire. And at once the Lord spoke of their pride: “Beware,” he says, “of the scribes, who love to preside in the synagogues and love the first place at banquets.” Not because they accept them, but because they love them. Here he accused their heart; and he could not be the accuser of the heart if he were not the searcher of the heart. For it is right that a servant of God who holds some office in the church should be given the first place; because if it is not given him, it is bad for the one who does not give it; but it is not good for the one to whom it is given. So it is right that in the assembly of Christians those set over the people should sit higher, so that they are distinguished by their very seat and their office is plain enough; yet not so that they are puffed up by the seat, but so that they think of the burden for which they will give account. But who knows whether they love this or not? That is a matter of the heart; it can have no judge but God. The Lord himself warned his own not to fall into such leaven, as he says in another place: “Beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and Sadducees.” And when they thought he said this because they had brought no bread, he answered them: “Have you forgotten how many thousands were filled from five loaves?” “Then,” it says, “they understood that he meant their teaching by leaven.” For those men loved these temporal things; but they neither feared eternal evils nor loved eternal goods. With their hearts shut, they could not understand what the Lord asked.
Gal 5:6 (allusion, high confidence) · Mark 12:38–39 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 23:6 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 16:6–12 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Because the mystery requires a cleansed heart, Christ turned at once to the scribes’ pride; church leaders may rightly take the first seat but must not love it, which God alone can judge.
- The opening words “Honores ecclesiastici” (“Church honors”) are Migne’s marginal heading left in the text; not translated. Quotations: Gal 5:6; Matt 23:6 (Mark 12:38–39; Luke 20:46); Matt 16:6–12.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's marginal heading left in the text; OCR slips): Honores ecclesiasi ici. → ; inundatur aulem moribus → mundatur autem moribus; qui amant præ,;dere iit synagogis → qui amant præsidere in synagogis.
Topics: Church office
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 91.5 (PL 38:361; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/91-1/#p-91-5). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-91-5) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
91.6PL 38:361
Quid autem faciat Ecclesia Dei, ut possit intelligere quod prima meruit credere? Faciat capacem animum ad recipiendum quod dabitur. Quod ut fieret, id est, ut capax animus esset, Dominus Deus noster suspendit promissa, non abstulit. Ideo suspendit, ut nos extendamus: ideo nos extendimus, ut crescamus: ideo crescimus, ut attingamus. Vide apostolum Paulum in suspensa extensum. Non quia jam acceperim, aut jam perfectus sim. Fratres, ego me non arbitror apprehendisse: unum autem, que retro oblitus, in ea quæ ante sunt extentus, secundum intentionem sequor ad palmam supernas vocationis Dei in Christo Jesu ( Philipp. III, 42-14). Ille in terra currebat: palma de coelo pendebat. In terra ergo currebat: sed in Spiritu ascendebat. Vide ergo extentum, vide ad suspensa pendentem. Sequor, inquit, ad palmam supernæ vocationis Dei in Christo Jesu.
What, then, should God’s church do so as to be able to understand what it first deserved to believe? Let it make the mind able to receive what will be given. So that this might happen, that is, so that the mind might be able to receive, the Lord our God has held his promises in suspense, not taken them away. He holds them in suspense so that we may stretch out; we stretch out so that we may grow; we grow so that we may reach them. See the apostle Paul stretched out toward things held in suspense: “Not that I have already received, or am already perfect. Brothers, I do not consider that I have laid hold of it; but one thing, forgetting what lies behind and stretched out toward what lies ahead, I press on in purpose toward the prize of God’s upward call in Christ Jesus.” He was running on earth; the prize hung from heaven. So he ran on earth, but he was ascending in the Spirit. See him stretched out, see him reaching toward what hangs above: “I press on,” he says, “toward the prize of God’s upward call in Christ Jesus.”
Phil 3:12–14 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: God delays fulfilling his promises so that the soul may stretch toward them and grow, as Paul strained forward toward the prize of the upward call.
- Quotation: Phil 3:12–14.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip): Ille in terra eurrebat → Ille in terra currebat.
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 91.6 (PL 38:361; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/91-1/#p-91-6). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-91-6) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
91.7PL 38:361–362
Ambulaudum ergo est, nec pedes ungendi, nec jumenta quærenda. nec navis providenda. Affectu curre, amore ambula, charitate ascende. Quid quaeris viam? Inhære Christo, qui descendendo et ascendendo se ipsum fecit viam. Vis ascendere? Ascendentem tene. Etenim per te ipsum levari non potes. Quia nemo ascendit in coelum, nisi qui de caelo descendit, Filius hominis, qui est in caelo ( Joan. III, 43). Si nemo ascendit, nisi qui descendit, ipse autem est Filius hominis Dominus noster Jesus; vis et tu ascendere? Membrum ipsius esto, qui solus ascendit. Etenim ille caput cum cæteris membris unus homo est. Et cum ascendere nemo potest, nisi qui in ejus corpore membrum iPsius factus fuerit; impletur, Quia nemo ascendit nisi qui descendit. Non enim potes dicere: Ecce quare ascendit, verbi gratia, Petrus, quare ascendit Paulus, quare ascenderunt Apostoli, si nemo ascendit, nisi qui descendit? Respondetur tibi: Petrus, Paulus et caeteri Apostoli, et omnes fideles, quid audiunt ab Apostolo? Vos autem estis corpus Christi, et membra ex parte. Si ergo corpus Christi et membra unius sunt, noli facere duos. Reliquit enim ille patrem et matrem, et adhæsit uxori suae, ut essent duo in carne una (Ephes. v, SI, 32). Reliquit patrem, quia non hic se ostendit. æqualem Patri: sed semetipsum exinanivit, formam servi accipiens. Reliquit et matrem Synagogam, de qua carnaliter natus est. Adhaesit uxori suæ, id est, Ecclesiæ suae. Quod testimonium et ipse cum commemoraret, quod separari non licercl conjugium demonstravit: Non legistis, inquit, quia Deus qui fecit ab initio, masculum et feminam fecit eos? Erunlduo, inquit, in carne una. Quod ergo Deut conjunxit, homo non separet. Et quid est, Duo in carne una? Sequitur, et dicit: Igitur jam non duo, sed una caro. Nemo ascendit, nisi qui dcscendit.
So one must walk; and no feet need anointing, no beasts of burden need finding, no ship need providing. Run by affection, walk by love, ascend by charity. Why look for the way? Cling to Christ, who by descending and ascending made himself the way. Do you want to ascend? Hold on to the one who ascends. For by yourself you cannot be lifted up. “For no one has ascended into heaven except he who descended from heaven, the Son of Man, who is in heaven.” If no one ascends except he who descended, and he is the Son of Man, our Lord Jesus, do you too want to ascend? Be a member of him who alone ascends. For he, the head, with the other members is one man. And since no one can ascend except one who has been made a member of him in his body, it is fulfilled that “no one has ascended except he who descended.” For you cannot say, “See, then, why did Peter, for example, ascend, why did Paul ascend, why did the apostles ascend, if no one ascends except he who descended?” The answer to you is: Peter, Paul, the other apostles, and all the faithful, what do they hear from the apostle? “Now you are the body of Christ, and members in part.” If, then, the body of Christ and the members belong to one, do not make two. For he left father and mother and clung to his wife, so that the two should be in one flesh. He left his Father, because here he did not show himself equal to the Father, but emptied himself, taking the form of a servant. He left his mother too, the synagogue, from which he was born according to the flesh. He clung to his wife, that is, to his church. And when he himself recalled that testimony, he showed that marriage may not be dissolved: “Have you not read,” he says, “that God who made them from the beginning made them male and female? The two,” he says, “will be in one flesh. What God has joined, then, let man not separate.” And what does “two in one flesh” mean? He continues and says, “So they are no longer two, but one flesh.” No one ascends except he who descended.
John 3:13 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 12:27 (quotation, high confidence) · Eph 5:31–32 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 2:24 (quotation, high confidence) · Phil 2:6–7 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 19:4–6 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: No one ascends to heaven except Christ, so believers ascend only as members of his body, Christ and the church being two in one flesh as in marriage.
- The opening words “Non ascendit in cœlum nisi qui inhæret Christo” (“No one ascends into heaven except one who clings to Christ”) are Migne’s marginal heading left in the text; not translated. Quotations: John 3:13; 1 Cor 12:27; Eph 5:31–32 with Gen 2:24; Phil 2:6–7; Matt 19:4–6 (marriage may not be dissolved), translated as written. Christ leaving his mother “the synagogue” is Augustine’s allegory.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's marginal heading left in the text; OCR slips; OCR slips and stray footnote number): Non ascendit in coetum nisi qui inhæret Chri - sto. → ; Si ergo corpus Cbristi et membra unius sunt 1, noli faccro duos. → Si ergo corpus Christi et membra unius sunt, noli facere duos.; Sequitur, ct didit: Igitur jam non duo, aed una caro. → Sequitur, et dicit: Igitur jam non duo, sed una caro..
Topics: Marriage, Christology, Divorce and remarriage
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 91.7 (PL 38:361–362; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/91-1/#p-91-7). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-91-7) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
91.8PL 38:362
Nam ut noveritis, quia unus homo est sponsus ct sponsa, secundum carnem Christi, non secundum divinitatem: nam secundum divinitatem quod est ille, nos essc non possumus; quia ille crcator, nos crcatura; ille effector, nos facti; ille conditor, nos conditi: sed ut essemus cum illo unum in illo, caput nostrum esse voluit, accipiendo carnem ex nohis, in qua moreretur pro nobis: ut noveritis ergo quia hoc totum unus est Christus, per Isaiam dixit: Sicut sponso ulligavit mihi mitram, et sicut sponsam induit me ornamento. Ipse sponsus, ipse sponsa. Ipse plane sponsus in capite, sponsa in corpore. Erunt enim, inquit, duo in carne una: cl non jam duo, sed una caro est.
For so that you may know that bridegroom and bride are one man, according to Christ’s flesh, not according to his divinity (for according to his divinity we cannot be what he is, since he is the creator and we the creature, he the maker and we the made, he the founder and we the founded; but so that we might be one with him in him, he willed to be our head, taking flesh from us in which to die for us): so that you may know, then, that this whole is one Christ, he said through Isaiah: “As a bridegroom he has bound a turban on me, and as a bride he has clothed me with ornament.” He himself the bridegroom, he himself the bride: plainly the bridegroom in the head, the bride in the body. “For the two,” he says, “will be in one flesh; and now they are no longer two, but one flesh.”
Isa 61:10 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 19:5–6 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Christ is bridegroom and bride as one man, head and body, according to his flesh, as Isaiah’s words about the bridegroom and the bride show.
- Quotation: Isa 61:10 in Augustine’s Latin. Then Matt 19:5–6 / Gen 2:24.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slips): ornamento I pse sponsus, ipsesponsa. → ornamento. Ipse sponsus, ipse sponsa..
Topics: Christology
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 91.8 (PL 38:362; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/91-1/#p-91-8). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-91-8) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
91.9PL 38:362
Itaque ad membra ipsius pertinentes, ut hoc sacramentum intelligamus, ut dixi, fratres, pic vivamus, Deum gratis diligamus. Ipse autem qui ostendit peregrinantibus formam servi, servat pervenientibus formam Dei. De forma servi stravit viam, de forma Dei condidit patriam. Quia ergo multum est ad nos capere hoc, sed non est multum credere hoc: Nisi enim credideritis, ait Isaias, non intelligetis: ambulemus per fidem quamdiu pcregrinamur a Domino, donec perveuiamus ad speciem, ubi videbimus facie ad eadem. Ambulantes per fidem, bene operemur In bonis operibus gratuita sit dilecetio Dei, benefica sit dilectio proximi. Deo enim quod præstemus non habemus: sed quia proximo habemus quod præstemus, præstando indigenti promerebimur abundantem. Inde unusquisque quod habet, præstet alleri: quidquid plus habet largiatur inopi. Alius babet pecuniam: pascat paupcrem, vestiat nudum, ædificet ecclesiam, operclur de pecunia quidquid boni potest. Alius habet consilium: regat proximum, pellat tenebras dubitationis luce pietatis. Alius babet doctr:nam: eroget de cellario Domini, ministret conservis cibaria, confortet fudeles, revocet errantes, qu:crat perditos, quantum potest faciat. Est quod sibi crogent etiam pauperes: alius claudo pedes accommodet, alius cæco suos oculos duces præbeat; alius visitet infirmum, alius sepeliat mortuum. Sunt ista in omnibus, ut prorsus difficile inveniatur aliquis qui non habeat unde aliquid atteri præstet. Et illud ex - tremum cl magnum quod ait Apostolus, Invicem onera vestra portate, et sic adimplebitis legem Christi ( Galat. vi, 2).
So, belonging to his members, so that we may understand this mystery, as I said, brothers, let us live godly lives, let us love God freely. He who shows the form of a servant to those on pilgrimage keeps the form of God for those who arrive. By the form of a servant he paved the way; by the form of God he founded the homeland. Since, then, it is much for us to grasp this, but it is not much to believe it (“For unless you believe,” says Isaiah, “you will not understand”), let us walk by faith as long as we are on pilgrimage away from the Lord, until we come to sight, where we shall see face to face. Walking by faith, let us work well. In good works let our love of God be free, our love of neighbor beneficent. For we have nothing to give God; but because we have something to give our neighbor, by giving to one in need we shall earn the favor of the one who abounds. So let each give to another what he has; whatever he has in excess, let him bestow on the needy. One has money: let him feed the poor, clothe the naked, build a church, do with money whatever good he can. Another has counsel: let him guide his neighbor, drive away the darkness of doubt by the light of godliness. Another has learning: let him dispense from the Lord’s storeroom, serve food to his fellow servants, strengthen the faithful, call back the wandering, seek the lost, do what he can. There are things even the poor can give one another: one may lend his feet to the lame, another offer his eyes to the blind as guides; one may visit the sick, another bury the dead. These things are within everyone’s reach, so that one can hardly find anyone who has nothing to offer another. And there is that final and great thing the apostle says: “Bear one another’s burdens, and so you will fulfill the law of Christ.”
Phil 2:6–7 (allusion, high confidence) · Isa 7:9 (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Cor 5:6–7 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 13:12 (allusion, high confidence) · Gal 6:2 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Until we see face to face we walk by faith and do good works, each giving another what he has, money, counsel, learning, or simple service, bearing one another’s burdens.
- The opening words “Fide ac bonis operibus ad Dei visionem pervenimus” (“By faith and good works we come to the vision of God”) are Migne’s marginal heading left in the text; not translated. Quotations: Phil 2:6–7; Isa 7:9 (LXX/Old Latin form); 2 Cor 5:6–7; 1 Cor 13:12; Gal 6:2. The sermon ends here in the digital text.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's marginal heading left in the text; OCR slips; stray mark): Fide ac bonis operibus ad Dei visionem pervenimus. itaque → Itaque; Quia ergo inultum est ad nos capere hoc, sed non csl multum → Quia ergo multum est ad nos capere hoc, sed non est multum; pellat tenebras dubitationis luce pietatis I. → pellat tenebras dubitationis luce pietatis..
Topics: Ethics
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 91.9 (PL 38:362; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/91-1/#p-91-9). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-91-9) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
Chapter 92
92.1PL 38:362
Quæstionem propositam Judaeis dcbent solvere Christiani Dominus enim Jesus Christus, qui eam Judæis proposuit, ipse non solvit, sed Judæis; nobis autem solvit. Et commemorabo Charitatem vestram, et invenietis quia solvit. Primo nodum videte quæstionis. Quæsivit a Judæs quid cis videreretur de Christo, cujus esset filius: quia et ipsi sperant Christum. In Prophetis legerunt, venturum exspectaverunt, præsentem occiderunt: quia ubi legebant venturum Christum, ibi legebant quia occisuri erant Christum. Sed illius futurum adventum sperabant in Prophetis: nam futurum suum facinus non vidcbant. Sic ergo cos interrogavit de Christo, non quasi de incognito, aut cujus nomen nunquam audissent, aut cujus adventum nunquam sperassent. Nam quoniam adhuc eum sperant, ideo errant. Equidem et nos speramus cunt; sed venturum judicem, non venturum judicandum. Prophetæ autem sancti utrumque prophetaverunt, venturum eum injuste prius judicandum, venturum postea juste judicaturum. Quid ergo, inquit, vobis videtur de Christo? cujus filius est? Responderunt illi: David. Prorsus de Scripturis. At ille: Quomodo David in spiritu vocat eum Dominum, dicens: Dixit Dominus Domino meo, Sede a dextris meis, donec ponam iaimicos tuos scabellum pedum tuorum? Si ergo David in spiritu vocat eum Duminum, quomodo filius ejus eat?
The question put to the Jews Christians ought to answer. For the Lord Jesus Christ, who put it to the Jews, did not answer it himself for the Jews; but for us he has answered it. And I will remind your Charity, and you will find that he has answered it. First see the knot of the question. He asked the Jews what they thought of the Christ, whose son he was; for they too hope for the Christ. They read of him in the prophets, they awaited him as one to come, they killed him when he was present: for where they read that the Christ would come, there they read that they would kill the Christ. But they hoped for his coming in the future in the prophets; their own future crime they did not see. So he questioned them about the Christ, not as of someone unknown, or whose name they had never heard, or whose coming they had never hoped for. For it is because they still hope for him that they go astray. We too hope for him; but as the judge who is to come, not as one coming to be judged. The holy prophets prophesied both: that he would come first to be judged unjustly, and would come afterward to judge justly. “What do you think,” he says, “of the Christ? Whose son is he?” They answered, “David’s.” Quite right, from the Scriptures. But he said: “How then does David in the Spirit call him Lord, saying, ‘The Lord said to my Lord, Sit at my right hand, until I make your enemies the footstool of your feet’? If David, then, in the Spirit calls him Lord, how is he his son?”
Matt 22:42–45 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 110:1 (109:1 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The Jews, who read in the prophets both that the Christ would come and that they would kill him, could not answer how he is David’s son and Lord; Christians, taught by Christ, can.
- The opening words “Quæstio Judæis facta a Christo” (“The question put to the Jews by Christ”) are Migne’s marginal heading left in the text; not translated. Quotations: Matt 22:42–45; Ps 110:1 (109:1 Vulg.).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's marginal heading left in the text; OCR slip): Quaestio Judæis facta II. Christo. → ; sed Judæis t nobis autem solvit → sed Judæis; nobis autem solvit.
Topics: Christology
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 92.1 (PL 38:362; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/91-1/#p-92-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-92-1) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
92.2PL 38:362–363
Hic cavendum est, ne putetur Christus se negasse. filium esse David. Non se filium David negavit, sed modum quxsivil. Dixistis filium esse David, non nego: sed ille eum Dominum vocat; dicite mihi quomodo sit filius, qui est et Dominus: dicite quomodo. Illi nun dixerunl, sed tacuerunt. Dicamus nos, exponente ipso Christo. Ubi? Per Apostolum suum. Prius undc probamus quia ipse Christus cxposuil? Apostolus dicit: An vultis experimentum accipere ejus qui in me loquitur Christus. Ergo in Apostolo istam dignatus est solvere quæstionem. Primum per Aposlolum loquens Christus, quid dixit ad Timothcum? Memor esto Christum Jesum resurrexisse a mortuis ex semine David, secundum Evangelium meum (II Tim. n,8). Ecce Christus filius est David. Quomodo est et Dominus David? Dic, Apostole: Qui cum in forma Dei esset, non rapinam arbitratus est esse æqualis Deo. Agnosce Dominum David. Si agnoscis Dominum David, Dominum nostrum, Dominum cæli et terræ, Dominum Angelorum, æqualem Deo in forma Dei si agnoscis: unde filius David? Attendre quod sequatur. Apostolus Dominum David tibi ostendit dicendo, Qui cum in forma Dei esset, non rapinam arbitratus est esse æqualis Deo. Filius David unde? Scd semetipsum exinanivil, forma servi acciprens; in similitudinem hominum factus, el habita inventus ut homo: humiliavit semetipsum factus obediens usque ad mortem, mortem autem crucis. Propter quod et Deus illum exaltavit. Resurrexit Christus ex scminc David, filius David, quia exinanivit se. Quomodo exinanivit? Sumendo quod non erat, non perdendo quod erat. Exinanivit se, humiliavit se. Cum esset Deus, homo apparuit. Contemptus est in terra ambulans, qui coelum fecit. Contemptus cst quasi homo, quasi nullius virtutis. Non solum contemptus, sed insuper et occisus. Lapis erat jacens, offenderunt in eum Judæi, et quassati sunt. Quid autem ait ipse? Qui offenderit in lapidem istum, conquassabitur: super quem venerit autem lapis iste, conteret tum ( Matth. XXI, 44). Prius jacuit, et offenderunt: veniet desuper, et conteret quassatos. Accepistis et filium David, et Dominum David: Dominum David semper, filium David ex tempore: Dominum David natum de substantia Patris. filium David natum ex Maria virgine' conceptum de Spiritu sancto. Utrumque teneamus. Unum horum nobis erit æterna babitatio; alterum horum nobis est a peregrinatione liberatio. Dominus enim noster Jesus Chrisitus nisi dignatus esset fieri homo, perisset homo. Factus est quem fecit, ne periret quem fecit. Ilomo verus, Deus verus: Deus et homo totus Christus. Haec est Catholica fides. Qui negat Deum Christum, Photinianus est: qui negat liominem Christum, Manichæus est. Qui confitetur Deum aequalem Patri Christum et hominem verum, passum vere, sanguinem fudisse verum: non enim veritas nos liberaret, si falsum pretium pro nobis darct: utrumque qui confitetur, Catholicus est. Habet patriam, babet viam. Habet patriam, In principio erat Verbum: habet patriam, Cum in forma Dei esset, non rapinam arbitratus est, esse æqualis Deo. Habet viam, Verbum caro factum est ( Joan. I, i, 14): habet viam, Semetipsum, exinanivit formam servi accipiens. Ipse est patria quo imus, ipse via qua imus. Per ipsam adipsum eamus, et non errabimus.
Here we must beware lest it be thought that Christ denied that he was David’s son. He did not deny that he was David’s son; he asked about the manner. “You have said he is David’s son; I do not deny it. But David calls him Lord: tell me how he is son who is also Lord; tell me how.” They did not say; they kept silent. Let us say it, with Christ himself explaining. Where? Through his apostle. First, how do we prove that Christ himself explained it? The apostle says: “Or do you want proof of Christ, who speaks in me?” So in the apostle he deigned to answer this question. First, Christ speaking through the apostle, what did he say to Timothy? “Remember that Christ Jesus has risen from the dead, of the seed of David, according to my gospel.” See, Christ is David’s son. How is he also David’s Lord? Say it, apostle: “Who, though he was in the form of God, did not count it robbery to be equal with God.” Acknowledge David’s Lord. If you acknowledge David’s Lord, our Lord, the Lord of heaven and earth, the Lord of the angels, equal to God in the form of God: how is he David’s son? Mark what follows. The apostle shows you David’s Lord by saying, “Who, though he was in the form of God, did not count it robbery to be equal with God.” How David’s son? “But he emptied himself, taking the form of a servant; made in the likeness of men, and found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself, becoming obedient unto death, even death on a cross. Therefore God also exalted him.” Christ rose of the seed of David, son of David, because he emptied himself. How did he empty himself? By taking what he was not, not by losing what he was. He emptied himself, he humbled himself. Though he was God, he appeared as man. He who made heaven was despised walking on earth. He was despised as a man, as one of no power. Not only despised, but killed as well. He was a stone lying on the ground; the Jews stumbled on it and were shattered. And what does he himself say? “Whoever stumbles on this stone will be shattered; but on whomever this stone comes, it will crush him.” First he lay, and they stumbled; he will come from above and crush the shattered. You have received both David’s son and David’s Lord: David’s Lord always, David’s son from a point in time; David’s Lord born of the substance of the Father, David’s son born of the Virgin Mary, conceived of the Holy Spirit. Let us hold both. One of these will be our eternal dwelling; the other is our deliverance from pilgrimage. For if our Lord Jesus Christ had not deigned to become man, man would have perished. He became what he made, so that what he made should not perish. True man, true God: God and man, the whole Christ. This is the Catholic faith. Whoever denies that Christ is God is a Photinian; whoever denies that Christ is man is a Manichee. Whoever confesses Christ as God equal to the Father and as true man, who truly suffered and shed true blood (for the truth would not free us if he gave a false price for us): whoever confesses both is a Catholic. He has the homeland, he has the way. He has the homeland: “In the beginning was the Word”; he has the homeland: “Though he was in the form of God, he did not count it robbery to be equal with God.” He has the way: “The Word became flesh”; he has the way: “He emptied himself, taking the form of a servant.” He himself is the homeland to which we go; he himself the way by which we go. Through him let us go to him, and we shall not go astray.
2 Cor 13:3 (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Tim 2:8 (quotation, high confidence) · Phil 2:6–9 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 21:44 (quotation, high confidence) · John 1:1 (quotation, high confidence) · John 1:14 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Christ did not deny being David’s son; through Paul he explains that as God equal to the Father he is David’s Lord and by emptying himself in the flesh David’s son, and the Catholic faith confesses both.
- The opening words “Christus se filium David non negat” (“Christ does not deny he is David’s son”) and the word “CAPUT” are Migne’s heading and chapter mark left in the text; not translated. Migne’s paragraph 3 begins at “You have received both David’s son and David’s Lord”; the staged text runs it into paragraph 2. Quotations: 2 Cor 13:3; 2 Tim 2:8; Phil 2:6–9; Matt 21:44; John 1:1, 14. Photinians denied Christ’s divinity; Manichees denied his true humanity: Augustine’s classification, translated as written.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's chapter mark left in the text; Migne's marginal heading left in the text; OCR slip; OCR slip and stray footnote number): Christus se filium David noM vegat. lic cavendum est → Hic cavendum est; conteret quassatos. CAPUT Accepistis → conteret quassatos. Accepistis; Habet tiam, Verbum caro factum est2 → Habet viam, Verbum caro factum est.
Topics: Christology, Heresy
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 92.2 (PL 38:362–363; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/91-1/#p-92-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-92-2) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).