Sermons to the People 90.1–90.10
Latin text: PL 38 (Latin text: Migne, PL 38, digitized by Open Greek and Latin (patrologia_latina-dev, University of Leipzig), CC BY-SA 4.0).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0). Compare: NPNF 1/6: Sermons on Selected Lessons of the New Testament (R. G. MacMullen, ed., 1888).
Chapter 90
90.1PL 38:356
Convivium dominicum duplex: aliud hie, fidelium; aliud in cælis, beatorum. Nuptias filii regis ejusque convivium norint omnes fideles, et apparatus mensæ domini-ere omnium est voluntati propositus. Interest autem quomodo quis accedat, cum accedere non vetatnr. Scripturæ quippe sanctæ docent nos dominica duo esse convivia; unum quo veniunt boni et mali, alterum quo non accedunt mali. Ergo convivium Domini, unde modo cum Evangelium legeretur audivimus, habet utique bonos et malos. Omnes qui ab hoc convivio excusaverunt, mali sunt: sed non omnes qui intraverunt, boni sunt. Alloquor ergo vos, qui in hoc convivio boni discumbitis, quicumque attenditis quod dictum est, Qui manducat et bibil indigne, judicium tibi manducat et bibit. Omnes qni tales estis, alloquor vos, ut foris non quæratis bonos, intus toleretis malos.
The Lord’s banquet is twofold: one here, of the faithful; the other in heaven, of the blessed. All the faithful know of the marriage of the king’s son and of his banquet, and the furnishing of the Lord’s table is set before all who will. But it matters how each one approaches, since no one is forbidden to approach. For the holy Scriptures teach us that there are two banquets of the Lord: one to which good and bad come, the other to which the bad do not come. So the Lord’s banquet, of which we heard just now when the Gospel was read, certainly has good and bad. All who excused themselves from this banquet are bad; but not all who came in are good. I speak, then, to you who recline as good guests at this banquet, all of you who attend to what is said: “Whoever eats and drinks unworthily eats and drinks judgment to himself.” All of you who are such, I speak to you: do not look for the good outside, but bear with the bad inside.
Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.
Matt 22:1–14 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 11:29 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Augustine distinguishes the Lord’s two banquets, one here for good and bad alike, one in heaven for the good alone, and urges the good to bear with the bad within the church.
- The Gospel reading is the parable of the marriage feast (Matt 22:1–14). The quotation is 1 Cor 11:29. The heading in Migne adds that the sermon is against the Donatists and was preached at Carthage in the Restituta basilica.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip): unum quo veniunt boni et maii → unum quo veniunt boni et mali; ab hoc convitio → ab hoc convivio; imus toleretis malos → intus toleretis malos.
Topics: Eucharist
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 90.1 (PL 38:356; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/90-1/#p-90-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-90-1) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
90.2PL 38:356
Justi omnes hac in vita et mali sunt et boni. Non dubito atrdire velle Charitatem vestram, quinam isti sunt, de quibus alloquens disputavi, ut toris noti quærant bonos, intus tolerent malos. Si omnes mali sunt intus, quos sum allocutus? Si autem omnes boni sunt intus, quos monui ut tolerent malos! Prius ergo adjuvante Domino, de hac quæstione ut possumus, exeamus. Bonum si perfecte liquidoque perpendus, nemo bonus nisi unus Deus. Habes apertissime Dominum dieentem, Quid me interrogas de bono? Nemo bonus, nisi unus Deus (MattA. xix, 17). Quomodo ergo nuptiac ilhe habentbonos et malos, si nemo bonus nisi umus Deus? Primo scire debetis, secundum quemdam modum omnes nos esse malos. Prorsus secundum quemdam modum omnes mali sumus: secundum autem quemdam modom, non omnes boni sumus. Possumus enim nos Apostolis comparare? quibus ipse Dominus ait, Si ergo vos, cum sitis mati, nostis bona data dare filiis vestris. Si consideremus Scripturas, unus ibi erat malus inter duodecim Apostolos, propter quem Dominus ait quodam loco, Et vos mundi estis, sed non omnes (Joan. xit, 10). Allocutns tamen in commune omnes ait, Si vos cum sitis mali. Audivit hoc Petrus, aodivit Joannes, audivit Andræas, audierunt cæteri omnes undecim Apostoli. Quid audierunt? Vos cum sitis mali, nostis bona data dare filiis vestris: quanto magis Pater vester qui in cœlis est, dabit bona petentibus se (Matth. VII, i 1)? Audito quod mali essent, desperaverunt: audito quod Deus in caelis.esset pater ipsorum, respiraverunt. Cum sitis, inquit, mali: quid ergo debetur malis, nisi supplicium? Quanto magis, inquit, Pater vester, qui in cœlis eat? quid debetur filiis, nisi præmium? In nomine malorum, metus poenarum: in nomine filiorum, spes hæredum.
I do not doubt that your Charity wants to hear who these are whom I addressed in my discourse, telling them not to look for the good outside but to bear with the bad inside. If all inside are bad, whom have I addressed? But if all inside are good, whom have I warned to bear with the bad? First, then, with the Lord’s help, let us get out of this question as best we can. If good is weighed perfectly and purely, “no one is good but God alone.” You have the Lord saying most plainly, “Why do you ask me about the good? No one is good but God alone.” How then does that wedding have good and bad, if no one is good but God alone? First you should know that in a certain way we are all bad. Quite simply, in a certain way we are all bad; but in a certain way we are not all good. Can we compare ourselves with the apostles? To them the Lord himself said, “If you, then, though you are evil, know how to give good gifts to your children.” If we consider the Scriptures, there was one bad man there among the twelve apostles, on whose account the Lord says in a certain place, “And you are clean, but not all.” Yet addressing them all together he said, “If you, though you are evil.” Peter heard this, John heard it, Andrew heard it, all the other eleven apostles heard it. What did they hear? “If you, though you are evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more will your Father who is in heaven give good things to those who ask him?” Hearing that they were evil, they despaired; hearing that God in heaven was their Father, they breathed again. “Though you are evil,” he says: what then is owed to the evil but punishment? “How much more,” he says, “your Father who is in heaven”: what is owed to sons but a reward? In the name of the evil, the fear of punishment; in the name of sons, the hope of heirs.
Matt 19:17 (quotation, high confidence) · Mark 10:18 (allusion, medium confidence) · Matt 7:11 (quotation, high confidence) · John 13:10 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: All are in some sense evil, as Christ called even the apostles evil while naming God their Father, so the question is in what sense the wedding has good and bad.
- Migne’s marginal heading for this section reads “The just are both bad and good in this life.”
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slips): Prins ergo adjuvate Domino → Prius ergo adjuvante Domino; Si vos cum sitis nati → Si vos cum sitis mali; In nomine maiorum, netus poenarum: in nonine filiorum → In nomine malorum, metus poenarum: in nomine filiorum.
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 90.2 (PL 38:356; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/90-1/#p-90-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-90-2) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
90.3PL 38:356
Secundum quid crgo mali erant iidem ipsi, qui secundum aliquid boni erant. Quibus enim dictum est, Cum sitis mali, nostis bona data dare filiis vestris; continuo subjectum, Quanto magis Pater vester qui in cœlis eat * Pater ergo malorum, sed non relinquendorum; quia medicus sanandorum. Secundum ergo quemdam modum mali erant. Et tamen illi convivæ patrisfamilias in regis nuptiis, puto quia non erant de illo numero, de quibus dictum cst, Invitaverunt bonos et malos; ut in numero malorum deputentur, quos audivimus exclusos in illo, qui inventus est non babere vestem nuptialem. Secundum quid, inquam, mali erant qui boni erant: seeundum quid boni erant qui mali erant. Audi Joannem secundum quid mali erant: Si dixerimus quia non habemus peccatum, nos ipsos seducimus, et veritas in nobis non est. Ecce secundum quid mali erant: quia habebant peccatum. Secundum quid boni eraut?Si confessi fuerimus peccata nostra, fidelis est et justus, qui dimittat nobis peccata, et mundet nos ab omni iniquitate. Si ergo dixerimus, secundum hanc expositionem, quam audistis me de sanctis Scripturis, ut arbitror, protulisse, eosdem homines et bonos esse secundum quemdam modum, et malos secundum quemdam modum; si secundum hinc sensum voluerimus accipere quod dictum est, Invitaverunt bonos et malos, id est eosdem ipsos et bonos et malos; si hoc voluerimus accipere, non permittimur, propter ilium qui inventus est non habens vestem noptialem, et non utcumque projectus, ut tantum illo convivio privaretur, sed ut æterno in tenebrarum snpplicio damnaretur.
In some respect, then, those same men were evil who in some respect were good. For to those to whom it was said, “If you, though you are evil, know how to give good gifts to your children,” there was added at once, “How much more your Father who is in heaven.” The Father, then, of the evil, but not of those to be abandoned; for he is the physician of those to be healed. In a certain way, then, they were evil. And yet those guests of the householder at the king’s wedding, I think, were not of the number of whom it was said, “They invited good and bad,” in such a way that they would be reckoned among the bad, whom we heard were shut out in that one man who was found not to have a wedding garment. In what respect, I say, were the good evil, and in what respect were the evil good? Hear John say in what respect they were evil: “If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us.” See in what respect they were evil: because they had sin. In what respect were they good? “If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.” If, then, according to this explanation, which you have heard me bring forth, as I think, from the holy Scriptures, we say that the same people are good in a certain way and evil in a certain way; if we wish to take in this sense what was said, “They invited good and bad,” that is, the very same people both good and bad: if we wish to take it so, we are not allowed, because of the man who was found without a wedding garment, and was thrown out not in just any manner, so as only to be deprived of that banquet, but so as to be condemned to the eternal punishment of darkness.
Matt 7:11 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 22:10 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 22:11–13 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 John 1:8 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 John 1:9 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The same people may be both evil and good in different respects, but the man without the wedding garment shows that the parable’s bad guests are truly condemned.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip): Pater ergo maio! um → Pater ergo malorum; mali efantqui boni erant → mali erant qui boni erant.
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 90.3 (PL 38:356; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/90-1/#p-90-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-90-3) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
90.4PL 38:356–357
Sed dicit aliquis: Quid de uno homine? quid mirum? quid magnum, si servis patrisfamilias subrepsit onus in turba non habens vestem nuptialem? Numquid propter illum poterat diei, Invitaverunt bonos et malos? Intendite ergo, et intelligite, fratres mei. Unus ille unum gesus erat; nam multi erant. Respondeat hic mihi diligens auditor, et dicat: Nolo milii narres suspiciones tnas; probari mihi volo quia unus ille multi erant. Aderit Dominus, probabo plane, nec longius requiram ut possim probare. In ipsis suis verbis Deus adjuvabit me, et qnod vobis apertum sit ministrabit per me. Ecce ingressus paterfamilias, ut inspiceret discumbentes. Videte, fratres mei, quia non pertinuit ad servos, nisi invitare et adducere bonos ct malos: videte quia non dictum est, Consideraverunt servi discumbentes, et ibi invenerunt hominem non habentem vestem nuptialem, et dixerunt ei. Non hoc scriptum est. Paterfamilias inspexit, paterfamilias invenit, pater. familias distinxit, paterfamilias separavit. Hoc quidem praetereundum non fuit. Aliud autem probare suscepiMus, quomodo multi essent ille unus. Intravit ergo pater familias inspicere discumbentes, et invenit hominem non habentem vestem nuptialem: et ait illi, Amice, quomodo huc venisti non habens vestem nuptialem? At ille obmutuit. Talis enim interrogabat, cui ille fingere nihil poterat. Vestis quippe illa in corde, non in carne iuspiciebatur: quæ si desuper fuisset induta, etiam servis non fuisset occultata. Ubi sit induenda vestis nuptialis, accipite, ubi loquitur, Sacerdotes tui induantur justitiam. De ea veste dicit Apostolus, Si tanien iuduti, et non nudi inveniamur. Ergo inventus est a Domino qui servos latebat. Interrogatus obmutescit: ligatur, projicitur, damnatur unus a multis. Domine, dixcram, quia tu admones omnes admonere. Recolite mecum verba quæ audistis, et multos fuissc unum illum modo invenietis, modo judicabitis. Unum certe interrogavcrat Dominus, uni dixerat, Amice, quomodo huc intrasti? Unus obmutucrat, et de ipso uno dictum fuerat, Ligate illi manus et pedes, et mittite illum in tenebras exteriores: ibi erit fletus et stridor dentium. Quare hoc? Multi enim sunt vocali, pauci vero electi. Quid huic manifestationi vcritatis quispiam contradicat? Mittite, inquit, illum in tenebras exteriores. Illum certe unum, de quo dicit Dominus, Multi enim sunt vocal;, pauci vero electi. Ergo p uci non mittuntur foras. Certe unus erat ille, qui non habebat vestem nuptialem. Projicite eum. Quare projicitur? Multi enim sunt vocati, pauci vero electi Dimittite paucos, projicite multos. Certe unus erat. Unus omnino iste, non solum multi erant, sed multitudine bonorum numerum superabant. Multi enim et boni: sed in comparatione malorum pauci sunt boni. Multa frumenta nata sunt: compara palcis, et pauca grana sunt. iidem ipsi in se ipsis multi, in comparatione malorurn pauci. Quomodo probamus quia in se ipsis mulli? Multi ab oriente et ab occidente venient. Quo venient? Ad illud convivium, in quod boni et mali intrant. De alio convivio loculus adjunxit, Et recumbent cum Abraham, Isaac et Jacob, in regno cœlorum. Illud est convivium quo non accessuri sunt mali. Hoc quod modo est digne accipiatur, ut ad illud perveniatur. Iidem ergo multi, qui pauci: multi in se ipsis, pauci in malorum comparatione. Ergo quid ait Dominus? Invenit unum, et ait, Projiciantur inulti, remaneant pauci. Dicere enim, Multi vocati, pauci vero electi, nihil est aliud, quam aperte ostendere, qui in isto convivio tales habeantur, ut ad aliud convivium perducantur, quo nullus accedct malorum.
But someone says: “Why make much of one man? What is surprising, what is great, if in the crowd one man without a wedding garment slipped past the householder’s servants? Surely it could not be said on his account, ‘They invited good and bad’?” Pay attention, then, and understand, my brothers. That one man stood for a kind; for they were many. Here a careful hearer may answer me and say, “Do not tell me your suspicions; I want it proved to me that that one man was many.” The Lord will be present; I will prove it plainly, and I will not look far to be able to prove it. In his own words God will help me, and through me he will supply what may be clear to you. See, the householder came in to look at the guests. Notice, my brothers, that it was the servants’ part only to invite and bring in good and bad; notice that it is not said, “The servants looked over the guests, and found there a man who had no wedding garment, and said to him.” That is not written. The householder looked, the householder found, the householder distinguished, the householder separated. This was not to be passed over. But what we undertook to prove is something else: how that one man was many. The householder, then, came in to look at the guests, and found a man who had no wedding garment, and said to him, “Friend, how did you come in here without a wedding garment?” And he was silent. For the one who questioned him was such that he could feign nothing before him. That garment was looked for in the heart, not on the body; if it had been put on outwardly, it would not have been hidden even from the servants. Learn where the wedding garment is to be put on, where it says, “Let your priests be clothed with righteousness.” Of that garment the apostle says, “If indeed, being clothed, we shall not be found naked.” So he was found by the Lord, who was hidden from the servants. Questioned, he falls silent; he is bound, thrown out, condemned: one out of many. Lord, I had said that you prompt me to warn everyone. Recall with me the words you have heard, and you will now find, and now judge, that that one man was many. Certainly the Lord had questioned one; to one he had said, “Friend, how did you come in here?” One had fallen silent; and of that one it had been said, “Bind his hands and feet, and throw him into the outer darkness; there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.” Why this? “For many are called, but few are chosen.” Who can gainsay this plain showing of the truth? “Throw him,” he says, “into the outer darkness”: certainly that one, of whom the Lord says, “For many are called, but few are chosen.” So the few are not thrown out. Certainly he was one, the man who had no wedding garment. “Throw him out.” Why is he thrown out? “For many are called, but few are chosen.” Leave the few; throw out the many. Certainly he was one. This one man, all told: they were not only many, but by their multitude they exceeded the number of the good. For the good too are many; but in comparison with the bad the good are few. Many grains of wheat have sprung up: compare them with the chaff, and the grains are few. The same people are many in themselves, few in comparison with the bad. How do we prove that they are many in themselves? “Many will come from the east and from the west.” Where will they come? To that banquet which good and bad enter. Speaking of the other banquet he added, “And they will recline with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob in the kingdom of heaven.” That is the banquet to which the bad will not come. Let this one that now is be received worthily, so that we may arrive at that one. The same, then, are many who are few: many in themselves, few in comparison with the bad. So what does the Lord say? He found one, and says, “Let the many be thrown out, let the few remain.” For to say, “Many are called, but few are chosen,” is nothing other than to show openly who in this banquet are held to be such that they will be brought to the other banquet, to which none of the bad will come.
Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.
Matt 22:11–14 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 132:9 (131:9 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Cor 5:3 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 8:11 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The one guest without a wedding garment stands for the many bad, as Christ’s words “many are called, but few are chosen” show, while the good are many in themselves but few beside the bad.
- “That one man stood for a kind”: the printed “Unus ille unum gesus erat” is corrupt; translated with the sense “unum genus erat” (one kind). “Let your priests be clothed with righteousness” is Ps 132:9 (131:9 Vulg.).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slips): Qnare irojicitur? Mulli enim sunt VOCal;, pauci vero electu → Quare projicitur? Multi enim sunt vocati, pauci vero electi; Ergo quid ait pominus? → Ergo quid ait Dominus?.
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 90.4 (PL 38:356–357; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/90-1/#p-90-4). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-90-4) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
90.5PL 38:357
Quid ergo cst? Omnes qui acceditis ad mensam dominicam, quæ hic est, nolo esse cum multis separandis, sed cum paucis conservandis. Unde hoc poteritis? Accipite vestem nuptialem. Expone, inquies, nobis vestem nuptialem. Procul dubio illa vestis est, quam non habent nisi boni, in convivio relinquendi, servandi ad convivium quo nullus malus accedit, per Domini gratiam perducendi: ipsi habent vestem nuptialem. Quæramus ergo, fratres mei, inter fideles qui sunt qui habent aliquid, quod mali non habent, et ipsa erit vestis nuptialis. Si Sacramenta dixerimus, videtis quemadmodnm sint malis bonisque communia. Baptismus est? Sine Baptismo quidem nemo ad Deum pervenit: sed non omnis qui habet Baptismum ad Deum pervenit. Non ergo possum intelligere Baptismum esse vestem nuptialem, id est ipsum sacramentum; quam vestem video iii bonis, video in malis. Forte altare est, vel quod accipitur de altari. Videmus quia multi manducant, ct judicium sibi manducant et bibunt. Quid ergo est? Jejunatur? Jejunant et mali. Ad Ecclesiam concurritur? Concurruut et mali. Postremo miracula fiunt? Nou solum boni faciunt et mali, sed aliquando non faciunt boni. Ecce in vetere populo magi Pha. raonis miracula facicbaut (Exod. vu et VIII), Israelitæ non faciebant: in Israelitis solus Moyses et Aaron faciebant; cæteri non faciebant, sed videbant, timebant, credebant. Numquid meliores magi Pharaonis miracula facientes, quam populus Israel, qui miracula facere non valebat, et, ad Deum tamen populus pertinebat? I,. ipsa Ecclesia, Apostolum audi, Numquid omnes prophetæ? numquid omnes dona habe. curationum? numquid omnes linguis loquuntur (I Cor. XII, i9, 50)?
What then? All of you who approach the Lord’s table, which is here, I do not want you to be with the many who are to be separated, but with the few who are to be kept. How will you manage this? Take the wedding garment. “Explain the wedding garment to us,” you will say. Beyond doubt it is that garment which only the good have, those to be left at the banquet, kept for the banquet to which no bad person comes, and brought there by the Lord’s grace: they have the wedding garment. Let us look, then, my brothers, among the faithful, for who those are who have something the bad do not have, and that will be the wedding garment. If we say the sacraments, you see how they are common to the bad and the good. Is it baptism? Without baptism, indeed, no one comes to God; but not everyone who has baptism comes to God. So I cannot understand baptism, that is, the sacrament itself, to be the wedding garment, for I see this garment on the good and on the bad. Perhaps it is the altar, or what is received from the altar. We see that many eat, and eat and drink judgment to themselves. What then is it? Fasting? The bad fast too. Running to church? The bad run there too. Finally, miracles happen? Not only do the good work them, and the bad as well, but sometimes the good do not work them. See, among the ancient people Pharaoh’s magicians worked miracles; the Israelites did not. Among the Israelites only Moses and Aaron worked them; the rest did not, but they saw, they feared, they believed. Were Pharaoh’s magicians, who worked miracles, better than the people of Israel, who could not work miracles and yet belonged to God as his people? In the church itself, hear the apostle: “Are all prophets? Do all have gifts of healing? Do all speak in tongues?”
1 Cor 11:29 (allusion, high confidence) · Exod 7:11–12 (allusion, high confidence) · Exod 8:7 (allusion, medium confidence) · 1 Cor 12:29–30 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The wedding garment cannot be baptism, the eucharist, fasting, churchgoing, or miracles, since the bad share all of these.
- Pharaoh’s magicians: Exod 7–8. The apostle is 1 Cor 12:29–30. Baptism and the eucharist are said to be shared by good and bad: a point Augustine presses against the Donatists.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip): sod non omnis qui habet Baptismum → sed non omnis qui habet Baptismum; vestem nupiialcm → vestem nuptialem.
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 90.5 (PL 38:357; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/90-1/#p-90-5). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-90-5) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
90.6PL 38:357–358
Quæ est ergo vestis illa nuptialis? Hæc est vestis nuptialis: Finis autem prœcepti est, Apostolus dicit, charitas de corde puro, et conscientia bona, et fide non ficta (I Tim. I, 5). Hæc est vestis nuptialis. Non quæcumque charitas: ham plerumque videntur se diligere etiam homines participes malæ conscientiæ. Qui simul latrocinia faciunt, qui simul maleficia, qui simul histriones amant, qui simul aurigis et yenatoribus clamant, plerumque diligunt se: sed non est in eis charitas de corde puro, et conscientia bonq, et fide non ficta. Talis charitas vestis est nuptialis. Si linguis hominum loquar et Angelorum, charitatem autem non habeam, factus sum, inquit, ut æramentum sonans, aut cymbalum tinniens. Advenerunt linguae solæ, et dicitur eis, Quid huc intrastis non habentes vestem nuptialem? Si habuero, inquit, prophetiam, et sciero omnia sacramenta, et omnem scientiam, et habuero fidem, ita ut montes transferam, charitatem autem non habeam, nihil sum. Ecce sunt ilia miracula hominum plerumque non habentium vestem nuptialem. Si hæc, inquit, habeam omnia,et Christum non habeam,nihil sum. Nihil, inquit, sum. Ergo prophetia nihil est? ergo scientia sacra mentorum nibil est? Non illa nihil sunt sed ego, si illa habeam, et charitatem non habeam, nihil sum. Quanta bona nihil prosunt sine uno bono? Si non habeam charitatem, si eleemosynas largior in pauperes, si ad confessionem nominis Christi usque ad sanguinem, casque ad ignes accedo, possunt ista fieri et amore gloriæ, inania sunt. Quia ergo possunt fieri etiam amore gloriæ inania, non charitate pinguissima pietatis, ctiam ipsa commemorat, et ipsa audi: Si distribuero omnia mea in usum pauperum, et si tradidero corpus meum ut ardeam, charitatem non habeam, nihil mihi prodest. Hæc est vestis nuptialis. Interrogate vos; si habetis illam, securi estis in conviviodominico. Duæ suut in homine uno, charitas et cupiditas. Charitas nascatur in te, si nondum nata cst; et si nata est, alatur, nutriatur, crescat. Illa vero cupiditaS, ct si in hac vita exstingui penitus non potest; quia si dixerimus quod peccatum non habemus, nos ipsos seducimus, et veritas in nobis non est: in quantum autem est in nobis cupiditas, in tantum sine peccato non sumus: charitas crescat, cupiditas decrescat; ut aliquando illa perficiatur, hoc est charitas, cupiditas consumatur. Induite vos vestem nuptialem: vos alloquor, qui necdum habetis. Jam intus estis, jam ad convivium acceditis, et vestem in honorem sponsi nondum habetis: vestra adhuc quæritis, non quæ Jesu Christi. Vestis enim nuptialis in honore accipilur conjugationis, id est sponsi et sponsae. Nostis sponsum: Christus est. Nostis sponsam: Ecclesia cst. Deferte nubenti, deferte ducenti. Si istis bene detuleritis qui nubunt vos filii eritis. Ergo in hoc proficite. Diligitc Dominum, et ibi discite diligere vos: ut cum diligendo Dominum dilexeritis vos, securi diligatis proximossicut vos. Quando enim non invenio se ipsum diligentem, quomodo ei permitto proximum, quem diligat sicut seipsum? Et quis est, inquit, qui non diligat seipsum? Ecce quis est; Qui diligit iniquitatem, odit animam suam. Numquid diligit se, qui amat carnem suam ct odit animam suam, malo suo, malo animæ suæ et carnis suæ? Quis autem diligit animam suam? Qui diligit Deum ex toto corde suo, et ex tota mente sua. Jam tali committo proximum. Diligite proximos, tanquam vos ipsos.
What, then, is that wedding garment? This is the wedding garment: “The aim of the commandment,” the apostle says, “is love from a pure heart and a good conscience and faith unfeigned.” This is the wedding garment. Not just any love: for often even people who share a bad conscience seem to love one another. Those who commit robberies together, who practice sorcery together, who are fond of actors together, who shout together for charioteers and beast-fighters, often love one another; but in them there is no love from a pure heart and a good conscience and faith unfeigned. Such love is the wedding garment. “If I speak with the tongues of men and of angels,” he says, “but have not love, I have become like sounding brass or a tinkling cymbal.” Tongues alone have come, and it is said to them, “Why did you come in here without a wedding garment?” “If I have prophecy,” he says, “and know all mysteries and all knowledge, and have faith so as to move mountains, but have not love, I am nothing.” See, there are those miracles of people who often have no wedding garment. “If I have all these,” he says, “and have not Christ, I am nothing.” “I am nothing,” he says. Is prophecy then nothing? Is the knowledge of mysteries then nothing? Those things are not nothing; but I, if I have them and have not love, am nothing. How many good things are of no profit without the one good thing! If I have not love, though I give alms to the poor, though I go to the confession of Christ’s name even to blood, even to the flames: these things can be done even from love of glory, and then they are empty. Because, then, they can be done from an empty love of glory and not from love rich with godliness, he mentions these too; hear them as well: “If I give all my goods to feed the poor, and if I hand over my body to be burned, but have not love, it profits me nothing.” This is the wedding garment. Question yourselves: if you have it, you are secure at the Lord’s banquet. There are two things in one person, love and desire. Let love be born in you, if it is not yet born; and if it is born, let it be fed, nourished, made to grow. As for desire, even if it cannot be wholly put out in this life (for “if we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us,” and so far as desire is in us, so far we are not without sin), let love grow and desire decrease, so that one day the one, that is love, may be made perfect, and desire consumed. Put on the wedding garment: I speak to you who do not yet have it. You are already inside, you already come to the banquet, and you do not yet have the garment in honor of the bridegroom: you still seek your own things, not those of Jesus Christ. For the wedding garment is taken in honor of the union, that is, of the bridegroom and the bride. You know the bridegroom: it is Christ. You know the bride: it is the church. Give honor to her who is married, give honor to him who marries. If you honor them well, you will be their children. So make progress in this. Love the Lord, and there learn to love yourselves; so that when by loving the Lord you have loved yourselves, you may safely love your neighbors as yourselves. For when I do not find someone who loves himself, how shall I entrust to him a neighbor to love as himself? “And who is there,” someone says, “who does not love himself?” See who: “He who loves iniquity hates his own soul.” Does he love himself who loves his flesh and hates his soul, to his own harm, to the harm of his soul and his flesh? Who, then, loves his own soul? He who loves God with all his heart and with all his mind. To such a one I now entrust his neighbor. Love your neighbors as yourselves.
1 Tim 1:5 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 13:1–3 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 John 1:8 (quotation, high confidence) · Phil 2:21 (allusion, high confidence) · Ps 11:5 (10:6 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 22:37–39 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The wedding garment is love from a pure heart, a good conscience, and unfeigned faith, without which tongues, prophecy, alms, and even martyrdom profit nothing.
- The words at the start, “Bon4 cœtera sine charitate non prosunt. Charitas et cupiditas in homine,” are Migne’s marginal headings (“Other good things are of no profit without love. Love and desire in man”), left in the digital text; they are not translated. The quotations are 1 Tim 1:5; 1 Cor 13:1–3; 1 John 1:8; Phil 2:21; Ps 11:5 (10:6 LXX/Vulg.: “He who loves iniquity hates his own soul”); Matt 22:37–39. “If I have all these … and have not Christ” is Augustine’s paraphrase of 1 Cor 13:2.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's marginal headings left in the text; OCR slip; OCR slips; stray footnote number): Bon4 cœtera sine charitute non prosunt. Charitas et cupiditas in homine. → ; fede non ficta (L Tim. I, 5) → fide non ficta (I Tim. I, 5); prophetiam9 et sciero → prophetiam, et sciero; qui nabent vos filii critis. £rgo → qui nubunt vos filii eritis. Ergo; Jam tali committo proximum 1. → Jam tali committo proximum..
Topics: Ethics
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 90.6 (PL 38:357–358; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/90-1/#p-90-6). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-90-6) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
90.7PL 38:358
Quis est, inquit, mihi proximus? Omnis homo proximus tuus est. Nonne duos parentes habuimus omnes? Proxima sunt sibi cujusque generis aniinalia, columbus columbo, pardus pardo, aspis aspidi, pecus pecori, et non est proximus homo homini? Recolite institutioncm creaturæ. Dixit Deus, protulerunt aquæ; natantia, cetos magnos, pisces, alites, similiaque protulerunt. Numquid de una ave omnes avcs? Numquid de uno vulture omnes vultures? Numquid de uno columbo omnes columbi? Numquid de uno colubro omnes colubri? Numquid de una aurata omnes auratæ? Nurnquid de una ove omnes oves? Utique simul terra genera protulit omnia. Ventum est ad hominem, et non protulit terra hominem. Factus est nobis unus pater: nec saltem duo, pater et mater: factus est, inquam, nobis unus pater, nec saltem duo, pater et mater: sed de uno patre una mater; unus de nullo, sed a Dco factus est, et una de illo (Gen. i et n). Attendite genus nostrum: de uno fonte manavimus; et quia ille unus in amaritudinem versus est, omnes ex oliva oleaster facti sumus. Venit ct gratia. Generavit unus ad pcr - catum et ad mortem, tamen unum genus, tamen proximos sibi omnes; tamen non solum similes, scd etiam cognatos. Venit unus contra unum: contra unum qui sparsit, unus qui colligit. Sic contra unum qui occidit, unus qui vivificat. Sicut enim in Adam omnes moriunlur, sic in Christo omnes vivificabuntur ( i Cor. xv, 22). Sed quomodo de illo omnis qui n'scitur, moritur: sic in Christo omnis qui credit, vivificatur. Scd si habcat vestem nuptialem, si invitetur servandus, non separandus.
“Who,” someone says, “is my neighbor?” Every human being is your neighbor. Did we not all have two parents? Animals of each kind are neighbors to one another, dove to dove, leopard to leopard, asp to asp, sheep to sheep; and is a human being not neighbor to a human being? Recall how creation was established. God spoke; the waters brought forth swimming things, great sea monsters, fish, birds, and the like they brought forth. Did all birds come from one bird? All vultures from one vulture? All doves from one dove? All snakes from one snake? All gilt-heads from one gilt-head? All sheep from one sheep? Surely the earth brought forth all the kinds together. When it came to man, the earth did not bring forth man. One father was made for us: not even two, father and mother. One father, I say, was made for us, not even two, father and mother; but from the one father one mother. He from no one, but made by God; and she from him. Consider our race: we flowed from one spring; and because that one was turned to bitterness, we all became wild olives from an olive. Grace came too. One begot unto sin and death, yet one race, yet all neighbors to one another; yet not only alike, but also kin. One came against one: against one who scattered, one who gathers. So against one who killed, one who gives life. “For as in Adam all die, so in Christ all will be made alive.” But just as everyone born of him dies, so in Christ everyone who believes is made alive: but only if he has the wedding garment, if he is invited to be kept, not to be separated.
Luke 10:29 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 1:20–21 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 2:7 (allusion, medium confidence) · Gen 2:22 (allusion, medium confidence) · Matt 12:30 (echo, medium confidence) · 1 Cor 15:22 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Every human being is our neighbor, since all descend from one father, Adam, just as all who believe are made alive in the one Christ.
- Creation: Gen 1:20–21; the making of man and woman, Gen 2. “One who scattered … one who gathers” echoes Matt 12:30. Quotation: 1 Cor 15:22.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip): Numquid ele una ave → Numquid de una ave; factus est, inquam, nobis upus pater → factus est, inquam, nobis unus pater.
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 90.7 (PL 38:358; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/90-1/#p-90-7). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-90-7) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
90.8PL 38:358
Habete itaque charitatem, fratres mei. Exposui vobis vestem nuptialem, cxposui vobis vestem. Laudatur fides, constat, laudatur: sed quæ fides, distinguit Apostolus. Nam quosdam gloriantes de fide, et non habentes bonos mores, objurgat apostolus Jacobus, et dicit: Tu credis quoniam unus est Deus, et bene facis. Et dæmones credunt, et contremiscunt. Unde laudatus est Petrus, unde dictus est beatus, recolite mecum. Quia dixit, Tu es Christus Filius Dei vivi? IIIc non sonum verborum, sed affectum cordis intendit, qui beatum pronuntiavit. Nam vultis nosse beatitudinem Petri non in illis verbisfuissc? Hæc dixerunt et dæmones. Scimus qui sis; tu cs Filius Dei. Filium Dci confessus est Petrus: Filium Dei confessi suut dæmones. Distingue, domine, distingue. Distinguo plane. Petrus dixit in amore, dæmones a timore. Denique ille dicit, Tecum sum usque ad mortem. Illi dicunt, Quid nobis et tibi? Ergo qui venisti ad convivium, noli de sola fide gloriari. Distingue et ipsam fidem, et tunc in te agnoscitur vestis nuptialis. Distingunt Apostolus, doccal nos: Neque circumcisio, inquit, aliquid νalet, neque praeputium, sed fides. Dic quæ: numquid non et dæmones credunt et contremiscunt? Dico, inquit, audi, distinguo, modo distinguo: Sed fides, quæ per dilectionem operatur. Quae ergo fides? qualis fides? Quæ per dilectionem operatur. Omnem, inquit, scientiam si habeam, et omnem fidem, ita ut montes transferam, charitatem autem non habeam, nihil sum. Habete fidem cum dilectione: nam dilectionem non potestis habere sine fide. IIoc moneo, hoc cxhortor, hoc in nomine Domini docco Charitatem vestram, ut habeatis fidem. cum dilectione: quia potestis habere fidem sine dilectione. Nam non vos exhortor ut habeatis fidem t sed charitatem. Nun potestis enim habere charitatem sine fide; charitatem enim dico Dei et proximi: unde potest ista esso sine fide? Quomodo amat Deum, qui non credit in Deum? Quomodo amat Deum stultus, qui dicit in corde suo, Non eat Deus? Potest fieri ut credas venisse Christum, et non diligas Christum. Non potest autem fieri ut diligas Christum, ct non dicas venisse Christum.
So have love, my brothers. I have explained to you the wedding garment, I have explained the garment to you. Faith is praised; it is agreed, it is praised: but which faith, the apostle distinguishes. For the apostle James rebukes some who boasted of faith and did not have good conduct, and says: “You believe that God is one; you do well. The demons also believe, and tremble.” Recall with me why Peter was praised, why he was called blessed. Because he said, “You are the Christ, the Son of the living God”? He who pronounced him blessed looked not to the sound of the words but to the affection of the heart. Do you want to know that Peter’s blessedness did not lie in those words? The demons said them too: “We know who you are; you are the Son of God.” Peter confessed the Son of God; the demons confessed the Son of God. “Distinguish, sir, distinguish.” I distinguish plainly. Peter spoke from love, the demons from fear. Then he says, “I am with you even to death.” They say, “What have we to do with you?” So you who have come to the banquet, do not boast of faith alone. Distinguish faith itself too, and then the wedding garment is recognized in you. Let the apostle distinguish and teach us: “Neither circumcision,” he says, “counts for anything, nor uncircumcision, but faith.” Say which faith: do not the demons too believe and tremble? “I tell you,” he says, “listen, I distinguish, now I distinguish: but faith working through love.” Which faith, then? What kind of faith? That which works through love. “If I have all knowledge,” he says, “and all faith, so as to move mountains, but have not love, I am nothing.” Have faith with love; for you cannot have love without faith. This I urge, this I exhort, this in the name of the Lord I teach your Charity: that you have faith with love; for you can have faith without love. So I do not exhort you to have faith, but love. For you cannot have love without faith; I mean love of God and neighbor: how can that be without faith? How does he love God who does not believe in God? How does the fool love God, who says in his heart, “There is no God”? It can happen that you believe Christ has come and do not love Christ. But it cannot happen that you love Christ and do not say that Christ has come.
Jas 2:19 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 16:16–17 (quotation, high confidence) · Mark 1:24 (quotation, medium confidence) · Luke 4:34 (allusion, medium confidence) · Luke 22:33 (quotation, high confidence) · Mark 5:7 (quotation, medium confidence) · Gal 5:6 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 13:2 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 14:1 (13:1 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The faith that marks the wedding garment is not the bare belief demons share but faith working through love, since love cannot exist without faith though faith can exist without love.
- Quotations: Jas 2:19; Matt 16:16–17; Mark 1:24 (cf. Luke 4:34); Luke 22:33; Mark 5:7; Gal 5:6; 1 Cor 13:2; Ps 14:1 (13:1 Vulg.).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip): Habete (idem cum dilectione → Habete fidem cum dilectione.
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 90.8 (PL 38:358; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/90-1/#p-90-8). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-90-8) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
90.9PL 38:358–359
Ergo habele fidem cum dilectione. Ista est vestis nuptialis. Amate invicem, qui Christum diligitis: amate amicos, amate inimicos. Nun sit vobis durum. Quid ergo perditis, ubi multum acquiritis? Quid pro magno rogas Deum, ut moriatur inimicus tuus? Non est vestis ista nuptialis. Attende ipsum sponsum in cruce pro te pendentem, et pro suis inimicis Patrem rogantem: Pater, inquit, ignosce illis, quia nesciunt quid faciunt. Yidisti sponsum ista dicentem, vide et amicum sponsi cum veste nuptiali invitatum. Benedictum Stephanum attendite, quomodo increpat Judæos, tanquam sævus, tanquam iratus: Dura cervice, et non circumcisi corde et auribns, νοs restitislis Spiritui sancto. Quem Prophetarum non occiderunt patres vestri? Audisti quomodo lingua sæviat. Adhuc tu paratus es dicere in qucmlihel, atquc utinam in cnm dicas, qui Deum offenderit, non qui te. Offendit Dcum ct non increpas; oflendit te, clamas: ubi cst vestis illa nuptialis? Audistis ergo quomodo sævierit Stephanus: audite quomodo dilexerit. Offendit eos quos increpabat, lapidatus est ab eis. Et cum undique furentium manibus, et lapidum ictibus premeretur et tunderetur, prius ait: Domine Jesu Christe, accipe spiritum meum. Deinde posteaquam pro se stans oravit, pro illis qui lapidabant cum, genu fixit, ct dixit: Domine, ne statuas eis hoc delictum: ego moriar in carne, non illi in corde. Et hoc dicto obdormivit. Post hæc verba nihil addidit: dixit, ct abiit; novissima cjus oratio pro inimicis fuit. Di. scitc habere vestem nuptialem.Ita et tu fige genua, et collide frontem in terra, et accessurus ad mensam Domini, ad convivium sanctarum Scripturarum, noli dicere, Si moriatur inimicus: Domine, si quid a te merui, occide inimicum mcum. Quod si forte dicis, non times ne libi rcspondeat: Si occidere vellem inimicum tuum, te prius occiderem? An gloriaris, quia modo invitatus venisti? Cogita, paululum ante quid fuisti. Nonne me blasphemasti? nonne me irrisisti? nonae nomen meum de terra delere voluisti? sed plaudis tibi, quia invitatus venisti. Si te occidissem inimicam, quem facercm amicum? Quid male orando doces me, quod non feci in te?Imo ego, dicit tibi Deus, doccarn te, ut imiteris me. In cruce pendens dixi, Ignosce illis, quia nesciunt quid faciunt. Docui huc militem meum. Esto tiro meus contra diabolum. Aliter invicte nullo modo pugnabis, nisi pro tuis inimicis oraveris. Dic plane, dic etiam hoc, dic ut inimicum tuum persequaris: sed scienter dic; distingue quod dicis. Ecce homo est inimicus tuus: responde mihi, quid in illo inimicctur libi; numquid hoc quod homo est, inimicatur tibi? Non. Sed quid? Quod malus est. Quod homo est, quod ego feci, non libi inimicatur. Dicit tibi; Ego hominem feci non malum: factus cst malus per inobedientiam, qui potius zabulo obedivit, quam Deo. Quod ipse fecit, hoc libi inimicatur: unde malus, tibi inimicus est; non unde homo est. Audio enin hominem, ct malum: unum nomen cst natur, alterum culpae: sano culpam, et servo naturam. Hoc tibi dicit Deus tuus: Et ecce vindico te, occido inimicum tuum;dc illo tollo quod malus est, servo quod homo est: numquid si fecero illum hominem bonum, non occidi inimicum tuum, et feci amicum tuum?Sic roga quod rogas, ut non homines percant, sed ipsæ inimicitiæ pereant. Si autem hoc oras, ut homo moriatur; malus oras contra malum: ct cum dicis, Occide malum; respondet tibi, Quem vestrum '.
So have faith with love. That is the wedding garment. Love one another, you who love Christ: love your friends, love your enemies. Do not let this be hard for you. What do you lose, where you gain so much? Why do you ask God, as if it were a great thing, that your enemy should die? That is not the wedding garment. Look at the bridegroom himself hanging on the cross for you and asking the Father for his enemies: “Father,” he says, “forgive them, for they do not know what they do.” You have seen the bridegroom saying this; see also the friend of the bridegroom, invited with the wedding garment. Look at blessed Stephen, how he rebukes the Jews, as though fierce, as though angry: “Stiff-necked and uncircumcised in heart and ears, you have resisted the Holy Spirit. Which of the prophets did your fathers not kill?” You have heard how his tongue raged. You are still ready to say this against anyone you like; and would that you said it against one who has offended God, not one who has offended you! He offends God, and you do not rebuke; he offends you, and you shout: where is that wedding garment? You have heard, then, how Stephen raged; hear how he loved. He offended those whom he rebuked, and was stoned by them. And while on every side he was pressed and beaten by the hands of the raging men and the blows of the stones, first he said: “Lord Jesus Christ, receive my spirit.” Then, after he had prayed standing for himself, for those who were stoning him he knelt and said: “Lord, do not hold this sin against them”: let me die in the flesh, not they in the heart. And having said this he fell asleep. After these words he added nothing: he spoke and departed; his last prayer was for his enemies. Learn to have the wedding garment. So you too, bend your knees, strike your forehead on the ground, and as you are about to approach the Lord’s table, the banquet of the holy Scriptures, do not say, “If only my enemy would die,” or “Lord, if I have deserved anything from you, kill my enemy.” If perhaps you do say it, are you not afraid he may answer you: “If I wanted to kill your enemy, would I not have killed you first? Or do you boast because you have now come at my invitation? Think a little what you were before. Did you not blaspheme me? Did you not mock me? Did you not want to wipe my name from the earth? But you applaud yourself because you came when invited. If I had killed you when you were an enemy, whom would I have made a friend? Why do you, by praying wrongly, teach me what I did not do to you? Rather,” God says to you, “let me teach you to imitate me. Hanging on the cross I said, ‘Forgive them, for they do not know what they do.’ I taught this to my soldier. Be my recruit against the devil. You will in no way fight unconquered unless you pray for your enemies.” Say it outright, say even this, say that you pursue your enemy; but say it knowingly; distinguish what you say. See, your enemy is a human being: answer me, what in him is hostile to you? Is it that he is a human being that is hostile to you? No. Then what? That he is bad. “That he is a human being, which I made, is not hostile to you. He says to you: I made a human being, not a bad one; he became bad through disobedience, obeying the devil rather than God. What he himself made, that is hostile to you: he is your enemy from what makes him bad, not from what makes him human.” For I hear “a human being” and “bad”: one is the name of a nature, the other of a fault: I heal the fault and keep the nature. This your God says to you: “And see, I avenge you, I kill your enemy: I take from him that he is bad, I keep that he is human. If I make him a good human being, have I not killed your enemy and made him your friend?” So ask what you ask in such a way that people do not perish, but enmities themselves perish. But if you pray that a person should die, you are bad praying against the bad; and when you say, “Kill the bad one,” he answers you, “Which of you?”
Matt 5:44 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 23:34 (quotation, high confidence) · Acts 7:51–52 (quotation, high confidence) · Acts 7:59–60 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Following Christ and Stephen, who prayed for their killers, Christians should pray not for their enemies’ death but for the death of their enmity, since God hates the fault, not the nature he made.
- Quotations: Luke 23:34; Acts 7:51–52, 59–60; Matt 5:44 (love enemies). “Let me die in the flesh, not they in the heart” is Augustine’s gloss on Stephen’s prayer. Stephen’s rebuke of the Jews is quoted from Acts as written. “Zabulo” in the Latin is a late form of diabolus, “devil”. The last words, “Quem vestrum”, end abruptly in the digital text.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slips): vide ct nmicnm sponsi → vide et amicum sponsi; Denedictum Stephanum → Benedictum Stephanum; Si occidere vellem iniu:icum tuum, tc prins uccidercm? → Si occidere vellem inimicum tuum, te prius occiderem?.
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 90.9 (PL 38:358–359; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/90-1/#p-90-9). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-90-9) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
90.10PL 38:359–360
Extendite ergo dilectionem, non usque ad conjugcs et filios vestros. Ista dilectio ctiam in pecoribus et passeribus invenitur. Scitis istos passeres et hirundines quemadmodum diligant conjuges, simul ova fovcant, simul pullos nutriant, grata quadam et naturali bonitate, nulla cogitata mercede. Non enim dicit passer: Nutriam filios meos, ut cum senuero, pascanl me. Nihil horum cogitat: gratis amat, gratis pascit: affectum parentis exhibet, retributionem non requirit. Et nos, novi, scio, sic amatis filios vestros. Non enim debent filii parentibus thesaurizare, sed parentes filiis. Ilinc etiam mulli excitatis avaritiam vestram, quia filiis vestris acquiritis, cisque servatis. Sed extendite dilectionem, crescat ista dilectio: amare autem filios et conjuges, nondum vestis illa nuptialis est. Habete fidem ad Deum. Prius diligite Deum. Extendite ad Deum; et quos poteritis, rapite ad Deum. Inimicus est: rapiatur ad Deum. Filius cst, uxor est, servus est: rapiatur ad Deum. Peregrinus est: rapiatur ad Deum. Inimicus est: rapiatur ad Dcum. Rape, rapc inimicum: rapiendo non erit inimicus. Sic proficiatur, sic charitas nutriatur, ut nutrita perficiatur: sic vestis nuptialis induatur: sic imago Dei, ad quam creati sumus, proficiendo resculpatur. Peccando enim obsolefacta erat, attrita erat. Undo attrita? unde obsolefacta? Cum fricatur ad terram. Quid est, ad terram fricatur? Terrenis cupiditatibus teritur. Quanquam enim in imagine ambulet homo, tamen νane conturbatur. Veritasquacritur in Dei imagine, non vanitas. Amando enim veritatem imago illa, ad quam creati sumus, resculpatur, et proprius nummus Cæsari nostro reddatur. Sic enim ex responsione Domini audistis, tentantibus Judaeis dicentem Dominum, Quid me tentatis, hypocritae? Ostendite mihi numisma census, id est, expressionem imaginis et superscriptionem. Ostenditc mihi quid solvitis, quid paratis, quid a vobis cxigitur; ostendite mihi. Ostenderunt illi denarium: et quæsivit cujus habcret imaginem et superscriptionem. Responderunt, Cæsaris. Cæsar iste et imaginem suam quærit. Cæsar non vult sibi perire quod jussit, et Deus non vult perire quod fecit. Cæsar, fratres mei, non fccit nummum: monetarii faciunt; artificibus jubetur, suis ministris imperavit. Imago exprimebatur in nummo: in nummo est imago Caesaris. Et tamen quod alii impresserunt quaeritur: ille thesaurizat, ille non vult sibi negari. Moneta Christi homo est. Ibi imago Christi, ibi nomen Christi, munus Christi, et officia Christi.
Extend your love, then, not only as far as your wives and children. That love is found even in cattle and sparrows. You know how sparrows and swallows love their mates, warm the eggs together, feed the young together, by a certain kindly and natural goodness, with no thought of reward. For the sparrow does not say, “I will feed my young so that when I grow old they may feed me.” It thinks nothing of the kind: it loves freely, feeds freely; it shows a parent’s affection and seeks no return. And you too, I know, I am sure, love your children so. For children ought not to lay up treasure for their parents, but parents for their children. Hence many of you even stir up your greed, because you are acquiring for your children and saving for them. But extend your love, let this love grow: to love children and wives is not yet that wedding garment. Have faith toward God. First love God. Reach out to God, and whomever you can, carry off to God. Is he an enemy? Let him be carried off to God. Is it a son, a wife, a slave? Let him be carried off to God. Is he a stranger? Let him be carried off to God. Is he an enemy? Let him be carried off to God. Carry off, carry off your enemy: by being carried off he will no longer be an enemy. So let progress be made, so let love be nourished, so that once nourished it may be made perfect; so let the wedding garment be put on; so let the image of God, after which we were created, be re-engraved by progress. For by sinning it had been worn away, rubbed down. How rubbed down? How worn away? When it is rubbed against the earth. What does it mean to be rubbed against the earth? It is worn by earthly desires. “For though man walks in the image, yet he is disquieted in vain.” Truth is sought in God’s image, not vanity. By loving the truth, let that image after which we were created be re-engraved, and let his own coin be rendered to our Caesar. For so you heard from the Lord’s reply, when the Jews were testing him and the Lord said, “Why do you test me, hypocrites? Show me the coin of the tax,” that is, the impress of the image and the inscription. “Show me what you pay, what you prepare, what is demanded of you; show me.” They showed him a denarius, and he asked whose image and inscription it bore. They answered, “Caesar’s.” Caesar too looks for his image. Caesar does not want what he ordered to be lost to him, and God does not want what he made to be lost. Caesar, my brothers, did not make the coin: the mint workers make it; craftsmen are ordered; he commanded his servants. The image was stamped on the coin: on the coin is Caesar’s image. And yet what others stamped is sought back: he stores it up, he does not want it refused him. Christ’s coin is the human being. There is Christ’s image, there Christ’s name, Christ’s gift, and Christ’s duties.
Ps 39:6 (38:7 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 22:18–21 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 1:27 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Love must reach beyond family to God and to all, even enemies, so that God’s image in us, worn down by earthly desire, is re-engraved and rendered to God as Caesar’s coin is to Caesar.
- Quotations: Ps 39:6 (38:7 Vulg.: “though man walks in the image”); Matt 22:18–21. Creation in God’s image: Gen 1:27. The sermon ends here in the digital text without a doxology.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slips; stray mark): Nun cniir dicit passer → Non enim dicit passer; Sic proficiatur I, sic → Sic proficiatur, sic; nomen Christi •, munus → nomen Christi, munus.
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 90.10 (PL 38:359–360; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/90-1/#p-90-10). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-90-10) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).