Homilies on Numbers 24.1–24.3
Latin text: Migne, PG 12 (Latin text: Migne, Patrologia Graeca vol. 12 (1862), transcribed from library-scan OCR of the printed volume).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0).
Chapter 24
24.1PG 12:755b–759a
DeOsncrificiifl quae per unamquamque festivitatem jubentur ofl'erri, et de votis quae v'oven'tur Deo 9°. 1. Omnes qui imbuendi sunt eminentioribus disciplinis, tandiu molestum ducunt rudimentorum laborem, donec, quis sit et disciplina: illius ad quam υ introducuntur finis et fructus, ignorant. Cum vero imbutos per ordinem perfectio consecuta fuerit disciplinm, tunc delectabit rudimentorum pertulisse molestias. Sunt ergo et in sanctis ac divinis rebus prima quaedam rudimenta quibus inducuntur ii qui ad perfectionem beatitudinis tendunt. Quod evidenter famulus Dei in cantico Exodi designat dicens"; Indue et planta eos in monte hereditatis tum. praeparata habitatione tua , quam preparasti, Domine. Paulus quoque apostolus sciens esse qu:dam prima imbuendi initia, tunc deinde per tempus etiam ad perfectionem veniri, scribens quibusdam diccbat": Etenim cum deberetis jam magistri esse pr0pter tempus, rursum indigetis ut doceatniui quae siut elementa exordii sermonum Dei , ct iacti estis quibus lacte opus sit , non cibo forti. Omnis enim qui lacte alitur expers est sermonis justitit, parvulus enim est. Pcrfectornm vero cibus solidas est, qui pro possibilitate sumendi exercitatos lubent sensus ad discretionem boni vel mali. Et itcrum in aliis , litteram legis , omnemque bitjusmoii scripturam clen'tenta mundi esse commemorat". Et nunc. ergo ea quae pertinuerunt ad illos, qui prituis imbuebantur elementis , molesta nobis primo videntur auditu, volenti enim unicuique auditorum 362 discere de iis (pta: ad salutem pertinent, cum de sacrificiis arietum et hircorum vitulorumque recitatur, nihil sibi utilitatis conferre hujusmodi litteras judicaut , quantum ad ipsum Spectat aufitmn. Si vero quis inveniatur qui possit velamen quod est impositum in lectione Veteris Testaineuu, removere, atque imle perquirere qua! sint vera Sa- η crificia, quae purificcnt populum in diebus fesus: tunc videbit quam mira et magnifica sunt quae per haec indicantur, quae snperflua ignorantibus ac saperstitiosa ducuntur. Sed lucc quidem Paulus etsi qui ei similes sunt, plenius ab ipsa sapientiae! Verbo Dei perfectiusque cognoverint : nos auten quantum ex ipsorum litteris colligere possumus, is quibus nobis velut per umbram et imaginem indta quasdam dederunt, ad :cdificationem commune discutere summatim de sacrificiorum ritu aliqui tentabimus. In Paschae festivitate agnus suum esse qui purificat populum, in aliis vitulus, inata-.3 hircus aut aries, vel capra , vel vitula, sicut ex iis quae recitata sunt didicistis. Unus ergo ex iis au.malihus, quae ad purificandqu populum somnum. esse dicitur Dominus et Salvator noster. Sic enim intellexit Joannes qui est major omnium prophetarum, et signavit de ipso dicens ’δε Ecce Agnus Dei, ecce qui tollit peccata mundi. Quod si agnas qui ad purificandum populum datus est, ad personam Domini et Salvatoris nostri refertur, consequens videtur quod etiam caetera animalia , quae eisdem purificativis usibus deputata sunt, referri drbeant similiter ad aliquas personas , quae per ωιιίtum sanguinis Christi purificationi: aliquid luimanu generi conferant Vide ergo ne forte sicut Dominus et Salvator noster, quasi agnus ad occisionem ductus , et in Sacrificium altaris oblatus, peccatorum remissionem universo priestitit mnndo: ita fortassis et carterorum sanctorum acjustorum sanguis, qui effusus est a sanguine Abel justi, usque ad sanguinem Zachariae prophetae, qui interfectus est inter aedem et altare: alterius quidem sanguis sicut vitulre . alterius sicut hirci, aut capra). aut alicujus horum fusus est ad expiandum pro parte aliqua populum. Sive haec ad justorum prophetarumque personas, qui in hoc mundo jugulati sunt, vel eorum qui dicunt 9': ε Quoniam propter te morte aliicimur tota die, mstimati sumus sicut oves occisionis, referenda videantur: sive etiam ad superiores virtutes, quibus proeuratio humani generis data est, quis facile audeat affirmare? Neque enim haac animalia per speciem , sed per figuram referri ad illam vel illam putanda sunt. Nam et ipse Dominus Iesus Christus, non ideo agnus dicitur quasi qui mutatus sit et conversnsin speciem agni. Dicitur tamen agnus, quia voluntas et bonitas ejus qua Deum repropitiavit hominibus, et peccatorum indulgentiam dedit, talis exstitit humano generi quasi agni hostia immaculata et innocens, qua placari homimbus divina creduntur. Sic ergo fortassis et si quis est angelorum, cmlestiumqne virtutum , aut si quis justorum hominum , vel etiam sanctorum prophetarum atque apostolorum, qui enixius interveniat pro peccatis hominum : hicc pro rcpropitiatione divina, velut aries , aut vitulus, aut hircus, oblatus esse in sacrificium ob purificationem populo impetrandam accipi potest. Annon videtur ut aries , aut hircus holocaustum se obtulisse Paulus pro p0pnlo Israel, cum dicebat "z Optabam autem ego ipse anathema esse a Christo pro fratribus meis, qui sunt cognati mei secundum L'arnem ἲ Vis autem scire, quia se hostiam Paulus )lferat jugulandum ? Audi eum in aliis dicentem : l 1am enim ego immolor et tempus resolutionis, vel, nt in Graecis codibus legimus, reversionis nea: instat. Slc ergo figuraliter potest videri, lnod alius pro festivitate Novorum, alius pro festiritate Sabbati, alius pro festivitate Tabernaculorum, luasi hircus, aut vitulus, aut aries offeratur ad reoneiliandum hominibus Deum. Donec enim sunt peccata, necesse est requiri et hostias pro peccatis. lam pone, verbi gratia , non fuisse peccatum : si _ ton fuisset peccatum, non necesse fuerat Filium lei agnum fieri, nec Opus fuerat eum in carne positum jugulari, sed mansisset hoc quod in principio erat Deus Verbum : vcrum quoniam introiit peccatum in hunc mundum, peccati autem necessitas propitiationcm requirit, et propitiatio non fit nisi per hostiam, necessarium fuit provideri hostiam pro peccato. thuoniam peccati ipsius diversae et variae qualitates fuerunt, diversorum animalium mandantur hostize, procul dubio quae convenirent varietatibus peccatorum. Sic ergo efficitur alius sanctorum , sive angelorum , ut diximus , sive hominum vitulus, qui in illa festivitate interveniat pro populi delictis : alius autem aries in alia festivitate :quormn intercessione fiat purificatio pro peccatis. Quod si purificari potuerint homines a peccatis, et esse puriores , minuuntur et hostiae. Si enim pro peccatis sunt hostiae, et pro multitudine peccatorum multiplicatae sunt sine dubio‘, ct pro exiguitate minuuntur. llujus autem rei in prasentibns locis Scriptura: habemus indicia , id 363 est in ultima festivitate Sccnopegize, cum per octo dies hostimjubcntur offerri. Et prima quidem die quasi adhuc in abundantia peccatorum, quatuordecim vituli jubentnr offerri. Secunda autem die imminutis utpote peccatis minuuntur et hostiae, et tredecim vituli offeruntur. Tertia die duodecim, et post haec undecim : et ita quasi purificationibus, deficiente per dies multitudine peccatorum, minuitur consequenter etiam numerus hostiarum. Sic etiam pro dispensatione ('50) totius ' mundi rationem purificationis intelligis. lndigent enim purificatione, non solum qum in terra sunt, sed quae in caelis. Imminet namque et caelis perditio, sic enim dicit Propheta " : peribunt, et omnes ut vestimentum veterascent , et sicut amictum involves eos, et mutabuntur. › intuere igitur totius mundi, id est cmleslium ac terrestrium et infernorum purificationem : vide quantis indigeant . ista Omnia hostiis, quantos requirant vitulos, quantos arietes, quantos hircos. Sed et in his omnibus unus est agnus, qui totius mundi potuit auferre peccatum, et ideo cessaverunt caetera: hostia: : quia talis hzcc fuit hostia, ut una sola sulliceret pro totius mundi salute. Caneri enim precibus peccata, hic solus potestate dimisit. Dicebat enim ” : Fili, remissa sunt tibi peccata tua. Sic ergo imbuitur mundus , primo per diversas hostias remissionem qumrere peccatorum, donec veniat ad hostiam perfectam, ad hostiam consummatam , agnum anniculmn, perfectum, qui tollat peccata totius mundi :, per quem festivitates agat spiritales, non ad satietatem carnis, sed ad profectum spiritus sacrillciis spiritalibus purificatione mentis oblatis. Decet enim Deo immolari victimam cordis, et hostiam contribulati spiritus, non carnis et sanguinis iugu' lari : quia et si agnovimus Christum aliquando secundum carnem; sed nunc jam non novimus ς» ctideoin spiritu diem festum agamus, et spiritalia sacrificia jugulemus. Haec pro viribus nostris de diversitate sacrificiorum discussa sint , quorum ad liquidum intelligentiam scit ille, cui nuda et revelata sunt omnia, nec est ulla creatura in conspectu ejus invisibilis.
[On the sacrifices which are commanded to be offered at each festival, and on the vows which are vowed to God.] All who are to be instructed in higher disciplines find the labour of the rudiments irksome for as long as they do not know what is the end and fruit of the discipline into which they are being introduced. But when perfection in the discipline has come to those who have been instructed in order, then they will be glad to have borne the irksomeness of the rudiments. So in holy and divine matters too there are certain first rudiments by which those are introduced who strive toward the perfection of blessedness. This the servant of God plainly indicates in the song of Exodus, saying: “Bring them in and plant them on the mountain of your inheritance, in your prepared dwelling which you have prepared, Lord.” The apostle Paul too, knowing that there are certain first beginnings of instruction, and that then in time one also comes to perfection, wrote to some and said: “For though by this time you ought to be teachers, you need again that someone teach you the elementary principles of the words of God, and you have become such as need milk, not solid food. For everyone who is fed on milk is unskilled in the word of righteousness, for he is a child. But the food of the perfect is solid, who, according to their capacity of taking it, have their senses trained to distinguish good and evil.” And again elsewhere he calls the letter of the law and all writing of this kind the elements of the world. And now, then, the things which belonged to those who were instructed in the first elements seem irksome to us at first hearing; for each of the hearers who wishes to learn about the things that pertain to salvation, when the sacrifices of rams and goats and calves are read, judges that writings of this kind bring him no profit, as far as the hearing itself is concerned. But if anyone is found who can remove the veil that lies over the reading of the Old Testament, and from there search out what are the true sacrifices that purify the people on the feast days, then he will see how wonderful and magnificent are the things signified by these, which are thought superfluous and superstitious by the ignorant. But these things Paul and those who are like him have known more fully and perfectly from the very Wisdom and Word of God; we, however, as far as we can gather from their writings, in which they have given us certain indications as through a shadow and image, will try to discuss briefly some things about the rite of the sacrifices for the common edification. At the festival of the Passover it is a lamb that purifies the people, at others a calf, at others a goat or a ram, or a she-goat, or a heifer, as you have learned from what was read. One of these animals, then, which are taken to purify the people, is said to be our Lord and Saviour. For so John, who is greater than all the prophets, understood it, and marked it of him, saying: “Behold the Lamb of God, behold him who takes away the sins of the world.” And if the lamb that was given to purify the people refers to the person of our Lord and Saviour, it seems to follow that the other animals too, which are assigned to the same purifying uses, ought likewise to be referred to certain persons who, by the merit of the blood of Christ, contribute something to the purification of the human race. See, then, whether perhaps, just as our Lord and Saviour, led like a lamb to the slaughter and offered as the sacrifice of the altar, granted the remission of sins to the whole world, so perhaps the blood of the other saints and righteous too, which was shed from the blood of Abel the righteous to the blood of Zechariah the prophet, who was killed between the temple and the altar, the blood of one as of a heifer, of another as of a goat, or of a she-goat, or of one of these, was shed to make expiation for some part of the people. Whether these things are to be referred to the persons of the righteous and the prophets who were slain in this world, or of those who say, “For your sake we are put to death all the day long, we are counted as sheep for the slaughter,” or even to the higher powers to whom the care of the human race has been given, who would easily dare to affirm? For these animals are not to be thought to refer to this or that person in outward form, but in figure. For the Lord Jesus Christ himself is not called a lamb as if he had been changed and turned into the form of a lamb. Yet he is called a lamb because his will and goodness, by which he made God propitious to men and gave forgiveness of sins, proved to be for the human race like the spotless and innocent victim of a lamb, by which the divine is believed to be appeased toward men. So, then, perhaps, if there is any of the angels and heavenly powers, or any of righteous men, or even of the holy prophets and apostles, who intercedes more earnestly for the sins of men, he can be taken as offered in sacrifice for divine propitiation, like a ram, or a calf, or a goat, to obtain purification for the people. Does not Paul seem to have offered himself as a burnt offering, like a ram or a goat, for the people of Israel, when he said: “For I myself wished to be accursed from Christ for my brothers, who are my kinsmen according to the flesh”? Do you wish to know that Paul offers himself as a victim to be slain? Hear him saying elsewhere: “For I am already being sacrificed, and the time of my dissolution,” or, as we read in the Greek copies, “of my return, is at hand.” So, then, it can be seen figuratively that one is offered for the festival of New Fruits, another for the festival of the Sabbath, another for the festival of Tabernacles, like a goat, or a calf, or a ram, to reconcile God to men. For as long as there are sins, victims for sins must be sought. Now suppose, for example, there had been no sin: if there had been no sin, it would not have been necessary for the Son of God to become a lamb, nor would there have been need for him, placed in the flesh, to be slain, but he would have remained what he was in the beginning, God the Word. But since sin entered into this world, and the necessity of sin requires propitiation, and propitiation is made only through a victim, it was necessary that a victim be provided for sin. And since there were different and various qualities of sin itself, victims of different animals are commanded, doubtless such as would fit the varieties of sins. So, then, one of the saints, whether angels, as we said, or men, becomes a calf, interceding at that festival for the offences of the people; another a ram at another festival, through whose intercession purification is made for sins. And if men can be purified from sins and become purer, the victims too are reduced. For if victims are for sins, they are without doubt multiplied for a multitude of sins and reduced for their fewness. Of this we have indications in the present places of Scripture, that is, in the last festival, Tabernacles, when victims are commanded to be offered for eight days. And on the first day, as if sins were still abundant, fourteen calves are commanded to be offered. But on the second day, since the sins have been diminished, the victims are also reduced, and thirteen calves are offered. On the third day twelve, and after that eleven: and so, as the multitude of sins fails day by day through purifications, the number of victims is consequently reduced too. In this way you may also understand the plan of purification in the governance of the whole world. For not only the things on earth need purification, but also those in heaven. For perdition threatens even the heavens, for so the prophet says: “They will perish, and all will grow old like a garment, and like a cloak you will roll them up, and they will be changed.” Behold, then, the purification of the whole world, that is, of heavenly and earthly and infernal things: see how many victims all these need, how many calves, how many rams, how many goats they require. But among all these there is one lamb who was able to take away the sin of the whole world; and therefore the other victims ceased, because this victim was such that it alone sufficed for the salvation of the whole world. For the others remitted sins by prayers; he alone remitted them by power. For he said: “Son, your sins are forgiven you.” So, then, the world is instructed first to seek remission of sins through various victims, until it comes to the perfect victim, the consummate victim, the yearling lamb, perfect, who takes away the sins of the whole world; through whom it may keep spiritual festivals, not for the satiety of the flesh but for the advance of the spirit, with spiritual sacrifices offered in purification of the mind. For it befits God that the victim of the heart and the sacrifice of a broken spirit be offered to him, not that flesh and blood be slain: because even if we once knew Christ according to the flesh, now we no longer know him so; and therefore let us keep the feast in the spirit and slay spiritual sacrifices. Let these things, according to our strength, have been discussed about the variety of the sacrifices, whose understanding to the full is known by him to whom all things are naked and laid bare, and there is no creature invisible in his sight.
Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.
Exod 15:17 (quotation, high confidence) · Heb 5:12–14 (quotation, high confidence) · Gal 4:3 (allusion, high confidence) · 2 Cor 3:14 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 11:11 (allusion, medium confidence) · John 1:29 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 53:7 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 23:35 (allusion, high confidence) · Ps 44:22 (43:23 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 9:3 (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Tim 4:6 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 5:12 (allusion, high confidence) · Num 29:12–32 (allusion, high confidence) · Col 1:20 (allusion, medium confidence) · Ps 102:26 (101:27 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 9:2 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 51:17 (50:19 LXX) (allusion, high confidence) · 2 Cor 5:16 (quotation, high confidence) · Heb 4:13 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The various festival victims figure the saints, apostles, and angels whose intercession contributes to the purification of the human race, as Christ the Lamb takes away the sin of the whole world; the decreasing number of bulls at Tabernacles shows sins diminishing through purification, until the one perfect victim ends the others.
- The bracketed opening is the homily’s title as printed in the edition.
- Quotations and allusions: Num 28–29; Exod 15:17; Heb 5:12–14; Gal 4:3, 9; 2 Cor 3:14; Matt 11:11; John 1:29; Isa 53:7; Matt 23:35; Ps 44:22 (LXX 43:23; Rom 8:36); Rom 9:3; 2 Tim 4:6; Rom 5:12; Num 29:12–32; Col 1:20; Ps 102:26 (LXX 101:27); Matt 9:2; Ps 51:17 (LXX 50:19); 2 Cor 5:16; Heb 4:13. Origen says fourteen bulls on the first day of Tabernacles; Num 29:13 has thirteen (and then twelve, eleven…); translated as written.
- Origen’s suggestion that the blood of martyrs and the intercession of saints and angels contribute, by the merit of Christ’s blood, to the purification of others, and that the heavens too need purification, is translated exactly as written.
- Words lost in the scan after “nec Opus fuerat eum in carne” (a leaked “xuv,” stands there) are supplied from Baehrens's edition.
- The garbled “agnus suum esse qui purificat” is translated by sense.
Topics: Christology
Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Num. 24.1 (PG 12:755b–759a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-numeros/24-1/#p-24-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-numeros-24-1) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 12, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged; sections and lost lines from Baehrens, GCS 29–30, where noted); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
24.2PG 12:759a–761b
Post licec votorum lex ponitur, et novo principio utitur in bac Iegislatione Moses. Ait enim ' : llomo, homo quicunque voverit votum Domino. Quae est ista repetendi nominis causa? Quasi non snlliceret dixisse, homo qui voverit votum Domino. Quid est ergo quod ait, homo homo, et quid sibi vi-lit ingeminata hominis appellatio, non mihi silentio praetereundum videtur. Apostolus docet alium esse interiorem hominem , et alium exteriorem : et illum esse qui renovatur de die in diem secundum imaginem ejus qui creavit eum; hunc vero esse visibilem, qui corrumpitur . Cum ergo venitur ad istum jam profectum , ut lex Dei suscipiatur, ct vota Domino oll‘erantur; vota autem Domino oll'erre nemo potest, nisi qui habet aliquid in semetipso et in substantia sua quod olferat Deo: non sufficit iste exterior homo legem Dei suscipere, nec vota solus oll‘erre, non enim potest aliquidc dignum Deo habere : sed ille interior" est homo, qui magis habet in se quod Deo. lu illo namque est habitaculum virtutum , in illo omnis intellectus scientiae, in illo est divina: imaginis innovatio. Qui cum speciem suam , qua ex initio Deo factus est recuperaverit, et virtutum redintegratione pulchritudinem prioris formae receperit, tunc jam potest vota oiTerre Deo, et tunc jam non homo solum, scd homo homo dicetur. l\'am qui interiorem hominem non excolit, qui illius curam non gerit, qui virtutibus eum non instruit, moribus non adornat, divinis institutionibus non exercet, sapientiam Dei non qumrit, scientiae Scripturarum Operam non impendit, hic. non potest homo homo dici, sed homo tantum, et homo animalis : quia ille interior, cui verius et nobilius homo nomen est, sopitus in eo est carnalibus vitiis , et mundi hujus curis ac sollicitudinibus obrutus , ita ut in eo nec nominis ejus haberi possit appellatio (59.). Unde satis agendum est unicuique nostrum, ut si forte videt in se interiorem hominem peccatorum sordibus et vitiorum ruderibus oppressum jacere , citius ab eo auferatomnes immunditias , citius eruat eu ab omni inquinamento carnis et sanguinis, conm. tatur aliquando ad ptenitcntiam, revocet ad se me muriam Dei, revocet spem salutis. Non enirn extrinsecus aliunde quaerenda sunt, sed intra noscst salutis occasio, sicut et Domirms dixit‘uficce enim regnum Dei intra vos est. Intra nos namque est conversionis facultas. Cum enim conversus ingemueris, salvus eris, et tunc poteris digne Altissimo reddere vota tua, et homo homo appellari. \"otum autem est, cum aliquid de nostris ollerimusDeo. Vult ergo a nobis prius aliquid accipere Deus (33}, et ita nobis aliquid ipse largiri, ut dona sua et munera merentibus et non immeritis largiri vidcatur. Quid autem est quod vult accipere a nobis Deus? Audi Scriptura: sententiam ': Et nunc bracl, quid Dominus Deus tuus poscit a te, nisiut timeas Dominum Deum tuum et atubulcsls omnibus viis ejus, et diligas eum ex toto corde tuo, ct ex tota anima tua , et ex totis viribus tuis?» ll:ec sunt ergo quae Deus poscit a nobis. Quasi non prius oll'eramus, ab ipso accipiemus nihil. Legimus et in alio loco : Date gloriam Deo,» et:c Date magnificentiam Deo. Si dederitis gloriam, recipietis gloriam. Sic enim dicit ipse Deus " : «Gloriacantes me glorificabo. Ego vero dico, quod et si oll'eramus ei justitiam nostram, accipiemus ab ipso justitiam Dei. Et si oll'eramus ei nostram . id est corporis castitatem, accipiemus ab ipso spirillIS eaStilalem. El Si oneramus Ci 52M nostrum, accipiemus ab ipso sensum ipsius; sicut et Apostolus dicebat et Nos autem Domini Christi sensum habemus. Cum autem'nos obtulerim: Deo quae in nobis sunt, et ille contulerit in nos qua: sua sunt, tunc verejam non homo solum, sed horno homo dicemur. Uterque enirn homo vocabuliqu perfectione decenter ornatus est. Ista sunt ergo - vota, quae debet exsolvereis, qui homo homo appellatur. Seio diversa vota in Scripturis referri. Anna quidem vovit Deo fructum ventris sui, et Sarnoclem consecravit in templo ’. Alius , quodcunque sibi post victoriam redeunti occurrisset vovit Dm. occurrente lilia, vota lacrymanda persolvit".33ii vitulos, aut arietes, aut domos , aut alia hujusmoji ratione carentia, vota offerunt Deo. llle vero qui appellatur Nazaracus, semetipsum devovitDeo. lloc est enim vetum Nazartei quod cst super onrnc votum. Nam lilium ofl'erre, vel filiam , aut pecus, aut prredium, hoc totum extra nos est. Semetipsuat Deo olIerre, et non alieno labore, sed proprio placere, hoc est perfectius et eminentius osinius! votis : quod qui facit, imitator est Christi. Hic enim dedit homini terram, mare, et omnia qum in eis sunt, ad obsequium dedit et cmlum, solem quoquc et lunam, ac stellas, hominum ministerio eoneessit:pluvias, ventos, et omne quidquid in mundo est hominibus largitus est. Sed post haec omnia, semetipsum dedit. Sic enim dilexit Deus mundum, ut Filium suum unigenitum daret pro mundi hujus vita “. Quid ergo m‘agnum faciet homo, si semetipsum oll'erat Deo, cui ipse se prior obtulit Deus? Si ergo tollas crucem tuam, et sequaris Christum, si dicas : Vivo autem, jam non ego, vivit vero in me Christus ι’, si desideret et sitiat anima nostra redire et esse cum Christo, sicut ct Apostolus dicebat, et prtesentis saeculi non delectatur illeceliris, et si omnem legem quae de Nazarmis data est, Sjtit‘ilaiilel‘ impleat, tunc semetipsum, id est animam suam, obtulit Deo. Qui in castitate vivit, corpus suum vovit Deo secundum cum qui dixit “ : «Virgo autem cogitat quomodo sit sancta corpore et spiritu. Nam et hoc ipsum quod dixit sancta, ad hoc respicit : sancti enim dicuntur illi qui se voverunt Deo. Unde et aries, verbi eausa si vovetur Deo, sanctus appellatur, quem tonderi ad communes usus non licet. Sed et vitulus si devotus fuerit Deo, sanctus nihilominus appellatur, nec licet eum jungi in opus commune. Ex iis ergo colligamus quid est hominem seipsnm vovere Deo. Si te voveris Deo, imitandus tibi est vitulus , quem non licet humanis operibus deservire, nihil facere quod ad homines et ad praesentem pertineat vitam. SedC quidquid ad animam pertinet et ad divini cultus observantiatn, hoc et agendum et cogitandum tibi esl.
After these things the law of vows is set down, and in this legislation Moses uses a new beginning. For he says: “A man, a man, whoever vows a vow to the Lord.” What is the reason for repeating the noun? As if it were not enough to have said, “a man who vows a vow to the Lord.” What it means, then, that he says “a man, a man,” and what the doubled naming of man signifies, does not seem to me to be passed over in silence. The Apostle teaches that the inner man is one and the outer man another: and that the former is the one who is renewed day by day according to the image of him who created him, but the latter is the visible one, who is being corrupted. When, then, one comes to this stage of advance, that the law of God is received and vows are offered to the Lord (and no one can offer vows to the Lord unless he has something in himself and in his substance to offer to God), this outer man is not enough to receive the law of God, nor to offer vows alone, for he cannot have anything worthy of God; but it is the inner man who rather has in himself something for God. For in him is the dwelling of the virtues, in him all the understanding of knowledge, in him the renewal of the divine image. When he has recovered the form in which he was made by God from the beginning, and by the restoration of the virtues has received back the beauty of his former shape, then he can offer vows to God, and then he will be called not only “man,” but “man, man.” For he who does not cultivate the inner man, who takes no care of him, does not furnish him with virtues, does not adorn him with good conduct, does not exercise him in divine teachings, does not seek the wisdom of God, does not devote effort to the knowledge of the Scriptures, cannot be called “man, man,” but only “man,” and natural man: because that inner one, to whom the name of man belongs more truly and nobly, is lulled to sleep in him by carnal vices and overwhelmed by the cares and anxieties of this world, so that not even the title of his name can be held in him. Hence each of us must take great pains, if perhaps he sees the inner man in himself lying oppressed by the filth of sins and the rubble of vices, quickly to take away from him all uncleanness, quickly to rescue him from all defilement of flesh and blood, to turn him at last to repentance, to call back to him the memory of God, to call back the hope of salvation. For these things are not to be sought outside from elsewhere, but the occasion of salvation is within us, as the Lord too said: “For behold, the kingdom of God is within you.” For the power of conversion is within us. For when you have turned and groaned, you will be saved; and then you will be able worthily to render your vows to the Most High and be called “man, man.” A vow is when we offer something of ours to God. God wishes, then, first to receive something from us, and so himself to bestow something on us, so that he may be seen to bestow his gifts and presents on the deserving and not the undeserving. But what is it that God wishes to receive from us? Hear the sentence of Scripture: “And now, Israel, what does the Lord your God ask of you, but that you fear the Lord your God and walk in all his ways, and love him with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength?” These, then, are the things which God asks of us. Unless we offer first, we shall receive nothing from him. We read in another place too: “Give glory to God,” and “Give majesty to God.” If you give glory, you will receive glory. For so God himself says: “Those who glorify me I will glorify.” And I say that if we offer him our righteousness, we shall receive from him the righteousness of God. And if we offer him our chastity, that is, of the body, we shall receive from him chastity of the spirit. And if we offer him our mind, we shall receive from him his mind; as the Apostle too said: “But we have the mind of the Lord Christ.” And when we have offered to God the things that are in us, and he has conferred on us the things that are his, then truly we shall be called not only “man” but “man, man.” For each man is fittingly adorned with the perfection of the name. These, then, are the vows which he ought to pay who is called “man, man.” I know that different vows are recorded in the Scriptures. Hannah vowed to God the fruit of her womb and consecrated Samuel in the temple. Another vowed to God whatever should meet him as he returned after victory, and when his daughter met him, he paid a vow to be wept over. Some offer to God as vows calves, or rams, or houses, or other such things lacking reason. But he who is called a Nazirite vowed himself to God. For this is the vow of the Nazirite, which is above every vow. For to offer a son or a daughter, or cattle, or an estate, is all outside us. To offer oneself to God, and to please him not by another’s labour but by one’s own, this is more perfect and more eminent than all vows: and he who does this is an imitator of Christ. For he gave man the earth, the sea, and all that is in them; he gave even the heavens for his service; the sun too and the moon and stars he granted for the ministry of men; rains, winds, and everything that is in the world he bestowed on men. But after all these things he gave himself. “For God so loved the world that he gave his only-begotten Son” for the life of this world. What great thing, then, will a man do if he offers himself to God, to whom God first offered himself? If, then, you take up your cross and follow Christ, if you say, “Yet I live, no longer I, but Christ lives in me,” if our soul desires and thirsts to return and be with Christ, as the Apostle too said, and takes no delight in the enticements of the present age, and if it fulfils spiritually the whole law that was given about the Nazirites, then it has offered itself, that is, its soul, to God. He who lives in chastity has vowed his body to God, according to him who said: “But the virgin thinks how she may be holy in body and spirit.” For this very word “holy” looks to this: for those are called holy who have vowed themselves to God. Hence a ram too, for example, if it is vowed to God, is called holy, and it is not lawful to shear it for common uses. And a calf too, if it has been devoted to God, is no less called holy, and it is not lawful to yoke it for common work. From these, then, let us gather what it is for a man to vow himself to God. If you have vowed yourself to God, you must imitate the calf, which may not serve human works, doing nothing that pertains to men and to the present life; but whatever pertains to the soul and the observance of divine worship, this you must both do and think.
Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.
Num 30:2 (30:3 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Cor 4:16 (allusion, high confidence) · Col 3:10 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 17:21 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 30:15 (allusion, medium confidence) · Deut 10:12 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 29:1–2 (28:1-Ps LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Sam 2:30 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 2:16 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Sam 1:11 (allusion, high confidence) · Judg 11:30–39 (allusion, high confidence) · Num 6:2 (allusion, high confidence) · John 3:16 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 16:24 (allusion, high confidence) · Gal 2:20 (quotation, high confidence) · Phil 1:23 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 7:34 (quotation, high confidence) · Deut 15:19 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The doubled “a man, a man” in the law of vows signifies the renewed inner man together with the outer; God first asks of us our fear, love, righteousness, and chastity, and the highest vow, the Nazirite’s, is to offer oneself to God in imitation of Christ, who gave himself.
- Quotations and allusions: Num 30:2 (LXX 30:3, “a man, a man,” Hebrew idiom for “any man”); 2 Cor 4:16 and Col 3:10; 1 Cor 2:14; Luke 17:21; Isa 30:15; Deut 10:12; Ps 29:1–2 (LXX 28:1–2); 1 Sam 2:30; 1 Cor 2:16; 1 Sam 1:11, 24–28; Judg 11:30–39; Num 6:2; John 3:16 and 6:51; Matt 16:24; Gal 2:20; Phil 1:23; 1 Cor 7:34; Deut 15:19.
- The first word of the opening question, lost in the scan, is supplied from Baehrens's edition. A leaked marginal reference (“Luc.xvu, Jcrem. xm. 16.”) inside “Hic enim” is removed.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (leaked marginal references): llic Luc.xvu, Jcrem. xm. 16. enim dedit → Hic enim dedit.
Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Num. 24.2 (PG 12:759a–761b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-numeros/24-1/#p-24-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-numeros-24-2) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 12, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged; sections and lost lines from Baehrens, GCS 29–30, where noted); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
24.3PG 12:761b–763a
Sed interim pratsens lectio continet diversitates quasdam votorum. Etenim si vir fuerit qui vovit, liber esse dicitur in votis suis, nullique subcctus. Mulier autem si voveat, si quidem in domo patris sui sit, votum ejus iit patris pendet arbitrio : at si quidem ille recusaverit, liberabitur. Si vero mn recusaverit, et ipse et (ilia tenentur obnoxii. Quod si posteaquam non recusaverit pater, non ‘eddiderit votum filia, peecatmn ipsi manet. Simiiter autem ct erga maritum decernitur, ut si in mariti uxor aliquid voverit, et audiens marius non recusaverit, reus sit voti pariter cum txore. Si vero recusaverit, recusaverit , tam uxor sit libera, [nam maritus. Si vero tacuerit, uterque, ttt dixirtus, reus habeatur. lla‘c sunt quidem quae scripta unt : sed orandnsest nobis Deus, ιιι intellecnun iure dignetur se dignum, quo haec, ιιι decet, de Dei orbis intelligere possimus et advertere. Omnes qui ub lege Dei vivimus, et in Ecclesia ejus habemur, liqui sub patribus, aliqui sub viris agimus. Et si quidem parvula est anima et initia habet in eruditionibus divinis, ham sub patre agere creo denda est. Si vero jam adultior facta est, Ita ut viripotens sit ad concipiendum semen verbi Dei, et doctrina: spiritalis capere secreta, hare sub viro posita dicitur. Sic enim et Paulus dicebat de Corinthiis " : «Volo autem omnes vos uni viro virginem castam exhibere Christo. Qui vero perfectiores sunt et eminentiores horum, de illis non dicitur quod sub viro sint, sed audi quomodo de semetipso suique similibus pronuntiet Paulus ’δε Donec occurramus, inquit, omnes in virum perlectum, in mensuram aetatis plenitudinis Christi. Huic ergo animae, quae in virum perfectura occurrit, nemo dominatur in votis, sed habet potestatem suorum libertatemque votorum. Si autem feminei adhuc generis fuerit anima, cui vel vir vel pater dominetnr in votis, non semper in ipsa est cu'lpa, sed interdum redit ad viros vel parentes. De quibus applicare diliicile sit, tamen quas Domino largiente 365 potuerint, inferemus. Saepe diximus animas rum quae in Ecclesia Dei sunt, curam procurationemque haberi per angelos, quosque etiam ad judicium venire cum hominibus ostendimus, ut . illo divino constet examine, utrum sua desidia peccaverint homines, an monitorum custodemque ue-_ gligentia. Videtur mihi etiam in hoc loco,etiam sub mysterio designari et ostendi, quod alia: quidem ut lilia: Sub eis anima: degunt. aliae ut uxores secundum ea quae superius distinximus. Si qua ergo harum ofl'erre aliquid et vovere cupiat Deo. siquidem prmproperum et minus aptum quod vovit, est, illius est, utpote custodis et monitoris angeli, retrudere et reprimere voventis audaciam. Si vero audiens non represserit, non ntOnucrit, anima quidem liberabitur a culpa, ipse vero voti manebit obnoxius. Hoc quidem erga inferiores quasque lieri accipiendum est, perfectioribus ipse adest Dens, sicut scriptum est de p0pnlo Israel: Dominus ipse ducebat eos. Postea vero quam deliquerunt et inferiores semetipsis l'acti sunt, angelo traduntur. Unde ct Movses dicebat ηε Nisi tu ipse veneris nobiscum, non me educas hinc. Sed et de justo dicit Dens “z ε Cum ipso sum in tribulatione, et alibi dit-it”: Non timeas descendcre in [Egyptunnquouiam tecum ero. Justis ergo et electis ipse adest Dominus : inferioribus vero adsunt angeli, secundum ea quae superius diximus, gubernantes eos et procurantes, votaque eorum aliquando ad semetipsos transferentes, aliquando vero super ipsos relinquentes. Sed cono tendere debemus ttt occurramus in virum perfectum, in mensuram anatis plenitudinis Christi; ut utamur libertate votorum, et ita adhaerere Domino festinemus, ut cum ipso untts spiritus simus, et ipse itt nobis maneat, et nos in ipso ; et nihil in nobis femineum, nihilparvula: :etatisltabeatur, ne necesse sit nobis sub tutoribus et procuratoribus derelinqui a patre : sed festinemus audire illam a Domino et Salvatore nostro vocctn,qua»ait, ipse Pater diligit vos, t ipsi gloria in saecula szeculorum. Amen.
But meanwhile the present reading contains certain differences between vows. For if it is a man who has vowed, he is said to be free in his vows and subject to no one. But if a woman vows, if she is in her father’s house, her vow depends on her father’s decision: and if he refuses, she will be set free. But if he does not refuse, both he and the daughter are held bound. And if, after the father has not refused, the daughter does not pay the vow, the sin remains with her. Likewise it is decided concerning the husband, that if a wife has vowed something in her husband’s house and the husband hears and does not refuse, he is liable for the vow together with his wife. But if he refuses, then the wife is free, and so is the husband. But if he keeps silent, both, as we said, are held liable. These are the things that are written; but we must pray God to deign to give us an understanding worthy of himself, by which we may understand and perceive these things, as is fitting, from the words of God. All of us who live under the law of God and are held in his church live, some under fathers, some under husbands. And if the soul is little and has only beginnings in divine instruction, is to be believed to live under a father. But if it has now grown older, so that it is marriageable, able to conceive the seed of the word of God and to grasp the secrets of spiritual doctrine, it is said to be placed under a husband. For so Paul too said of the Corinthians: “For I wish to present you all as a chaste virgin to one husband, to Christ.” But of those who are more perfect and more eminent than these it is not said that they are under a husband; but hear how Paul declares of himself and those like him: “Until we all meet,” he says, “in a perfect man, in the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ.” Over this soul, then, which meets in a perfect man, no one has dominion in its vows, but it has power and freedom over its own vows. But if the soul is still of the female sex, so that a husband or a father has dominion over its vows, the fault is not always in it, but sometimes goes back to the husbands or fathers. Who these are may be difficult to apply; yet we will bring forward what we can by the Lord’s gift. We have often said that the souls of those who are in the church of God are under the care and stewardship of angels, and we have shown that these also come to judgment with men, so that it may be established in that divine examination whether men sinned by their own sloth or by the negligence of those who warned and guarded them. It seems to me that in this place too it is indicated and shown in a mystery that some souls live under them as daughters, others as wives, according to the distinctions we made above. If, then, one of these wishes to offer and vow something to God, and if what it vows is over-hasty and less suitable, it belongs to that angel, as guardian and counsellor, to hold back and restrain the boldness of the one vowing. But if, hearing, he does not restrain or warn, the soul will indeed be freed from blame, but he himself will remain liable for the vow. This, indeed, is to be understood as happening with each of the lower souls; to the more perfect God himself is present, as it is written of the people of Israel: “The Lord himself led them.” But after they sinned and became lower than themselves, they are handed over to an angel. Hence Moses too said: “Unless you yourself come with us, do not lead me up from here.” And of the righteous man God says: “I am with him in tribulation”; and elsewhere he says: “Do not be afraid to go down into Egypt, for I will be with you.” To the righteous and chosen, then, the Lord himself is present; but to the lower the angels are present, according to what we said above, governing and caring for them, and sometimes transferring their vows to themselves, but sometimes leaving them upon them. But we must strive to meet in a perfect man, in the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ, so that we may enjoy freedom of vows, and hasten so to cleave to the Lord that we may be one spirit with him, and he may abide in us and we in him; and that nothing feminine, nothing of childish age, may be found in us, lest we need to be left by the Father under guardians and stewards; but let us hasten to hear that voice of our Lord and Saviour in which he says, “The Father himself loves you”; to him be glory for ages of ages. Amen.
Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.
Num 30:3–16 (30:4-Num LXX) (allusion, high confidence) · 2 Cor 11:2 (quotation, high confidence) · Eph 4:13 (quotation, high confidence) · Deut 32:12 (quotation, medium confidence) · Exod 33:15 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 91:15 (90:15 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 46:3–4 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 6:17 (allusion, high confidence) · John 15:5 (allusion, medium confidence) · Gal 4:2 (allusion, high confidence) · John 16:27 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The laws on women’s vows under father or husband are read of souls under the care of guardian angels, who share responsibility for rash vows they fail to restrain; the perfect, “a perfect man,” are free in their vows, and God himself guides them.
- Quotations and allusions: Num 30:3–16 (LXX 30:4–17); 2 Cor 11:2; Eph 4:13; Deut 32:12; Exod 33:15; Ps 91:15 (LXX 90:15); Gen 46:3–4; 1 Cor 6:17; John 15:5; Gal 4:2; John 16:27.
- The language of “female” and “childish” souls under fathers and husbands is Origen’s allegory of spiritual immaturity; translated as written.
- Leaked marginal references and notes are removed in three places: inside “recusaverit” (a repeated line from 24.2), before “si quidem parvula” (where the subject “anima”, lost in the scan, is supplied from Baehrens's edition), and inside “utamur.”
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (leaked marginal references and footnote splitting a word; misplaced line (from the previous section) splitting a word): recuso- licet occupare eum ad opus commune; est enim Domino consecratus et ideo dieitur verit → recusaverit; uta- Ephes. IV, t5. Exod. 54. Codex S. Theodorici, sub eis. Libb. mur libertate → utamur libertate.
Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Num. 24.3 (PG 12:761b–763a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-numeros/24-1/#p-24-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-numeros-24-3) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 12, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged; sections and lost lines from Baehrens, GCS 29–30, where noted); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.