On First Principles 3.1.6–3.1.14
Latin text: Migne, PG 11 (Latin text: Migne, Patrologia Graeca vol. 11 (1857), transcribed from library-scan OCR; words lost in the scan supplied, and 71 sections (68 disordered in the scan, and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) given, from Koetschau, GCS 22 (1913), via the archive.org scan).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0). Compare: Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 4 (1885), De Principiis.
On 3, chapter 1
3.1.6GCS 22:201
Ut autem ea, quae ratio consequenter ostendit, etiam scripturarum auctoritate firmemus, id est, quod nostri operis est recte vel minus recte vivere, et non vel ex his, quae extrinsecus incidunt, vel, ut quidam putant, fatis urgentibus cogimur, testimonium dabit Micheas propheta his verbis dicens: »Si annuntiatum tibi est, o homo, quid est bonum, aut quid dominus requirit abs te, nisi ut facias iudicium et diligas misericordiam et paratus sis ire cum domino deo tuo?« et Moyses ita dicit: »Posui ante faciem tuam viam vitae et viam mortis, elige quod bonum est, et incede in eo« et Esaias ita ait: »Si volueritis et audieritis me, quae bona sunt terrae edetis; si vero nolueritis neque audieritis me, gladius vos consumet; os enim domini locutum est haec«, et in psalmis ita scriptum est: »Si populus meus audisset me, et Israhel si in viis meis ambulasset, in nihilum utique inimicos eius humiliassem«, per quod ostendit quia erat in populi potestate ⟨»audire« et⟩ »incedere in viis« dei. Sed et salvator dicens: »Ego autem dico vobis non resistere malo« et »Quicumque iratus fuerit fratri reus erit iudicio« et »Quicumque inspexerit mulierem ad concupiscendum eam, iam moechatus est eam in corde suo«, et cum dat cetera quaeque mandata, quid aliud indicat, nisi quod in nostra potestate est observare posse quae mandantur, et propter hoc recte »rei« efficimur »iudicio«, si praevaricemur ea, quae utique servare poteramus? Unde et ipse ait quia »omnis qui audit verba mea haec et facit ea, similis est viro prudenti, qui aedificavit domum suam super petram«, et cetera, et quod ait: »Qui autem audit haec et non facit, similis est viro stulto, qui aedificavit domum suam super harenam«, et reliqua. Sed et illud quod dicit »his, qui a dextris sunt: Venite ad me omnes benedicti patris mei« et cetera; »esurivi enim et dedistis mihi manducare, sitivi et dedistis mihi bibere« evidenter ostendit quia in ipsis fuit, ut vel isti laudabiles essent, facientes quae mandata sunt et percipientes quae promissa sunt, vel hi culpabiles, qui contraria vel audire vel percipere meruerunt, quibus dicitur: »Ite maledicti in ignem aeternum«. Videamus quomodo etiam Paulus apostolus velut potestatem arbitrii habentibus nobis loquitur et tamquam in nobis ipsis vel salutis vel perditionis habentibus causas ait: »Aut divitias bonitatis eius et patientiae ac longanimitatis contempnis, ignorans quoniam benignitas dei ad paenitentiam te adducit? Secundum duritiam autem tuam et cor inpaenitens thesaurizas tibi iram in die irae et revelationis iusti iudicii dei, qui reddet unicuique secundum opera sua: his quidem, qui secundum patientiam boni operis gloriam et honorem et incorruptionem quaerunt, vitam aeternam, his autem, qui ex contentione et qui non credunt quidem veritati, credunt autem iniquitati, ira et indignatio, tribulatio et angustia in omnem animam hominis operantis malum, Iudaeo primum et Graeco; gloria autem et honor et pax omni operanti bonum, Iudaeo primum et Graeco«. Multa quidem alia et innumera in sanctis scripturis invenias, quae evidenter ostendant habere nos liberi arbitrii potestatem. Alioquin contrarium esset dari nobis mandata, ex quorum vel observatione salvemur vel praevaricatione damnemur, si observandi ea facultas in nobis non est.
That we may confirm by the authority of the Scriptures as well what reason has shown in due order, namely that it is our own work to live rightly or less rightly, and that we are not compelled either by the things that befall us from outside or, as some think, by the pressure of fate, the prophet Micah will bear witness in these words: “If it has been told you, O man, what is good, or what the Lord requires of you, but to do justice and love mercy and be ready to walk with the Lord your God.” And Moses says thus: “I have set before your face the way of life and the way of death; choose what is good, and walk in it.” And Isaiah says: “If you are willing and hear me, you shall eat the good things of the land; but if you are not willing and do not hear me, the sword shall consume you; for the mouth of the Lord has spoken this.” And in the Psalms it is written: “If my people had heard me, if Israel had walked in my ways, I would surely have humbled their enemies to nothing”; by which he shows that it was in the people's power to hear and to walk in the ways of God. And the Saviour, when he says, “But I say to you, do not resist evil,” and, “Whoever is angry with his brother shall be liable to judgment,” and, “Whoever looks at a woman to desire her has already committed adultery with her in his heart,” and when he gives all the other commandments, what else does he show but that it is in our power to be able to keep what is commanded, and that for this reason we are rightly made “liable to judgment” if we transgress what we certainly could have kept? Hence he himself says, “Everyone who hears these words of mine and does them is like a wise man who built his house on the rock,” and so on; and, “But he who hears these and does not do them is like a foolish man who built his house on the sand,” and the rest. And what he says to those on his right, “Come to me, all you blessed of my Father,” and so on, “for I was hungry and you gave me to eat; I was thirsty and you gave me to drink,” clearly shows that it lay in themselves either to be praiseworthy, as these were, doing what was commanded and receiving what was promised, or to be blameworthy, as those were who deserved to hear or receive the contrary, to whom it is said, “Depart, you cursed, into the eternal fire.” Let us see how the apostle Paul too speaks to us as to those who have power of choice and who hold in themselves the causes either of salvation or of perdition: “Or do you despise the riches of his goodness and patience and long-suffering, not knowing that the kindness of God leads you to repentance? But according to your hardness and impenitent heart you are storing up wrath for yourself on the day of wrath and of the revelation of the just judgment of God, who will render to each according to his works: to those who by patience in good work seek glory and honour and incorruption, eternal life; but to those who are contentious and do not believe the truth but believe iniquity, wrath and indignation, tribulation and anguish upon every soul of man who does evil, of the Jew first and of the Greek; but glory and honour and peace to everyone who does good, to the Jew first and to the Greek.” You will find many other, indeed countless, passages in the holy Scriptures that clearly show that we have the power of free choice. Otherwise it would be contradictory that commandments should be given to us by keeping which we are saved, or by transgressing which we are condemned, if the ability to keep them is not in us.
Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.
Mic 6:8 (quotation, high confidence) · Deut 30:15 (quotation, high confidence) · Deut 30:19 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 1:19–20 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 81:13–14 (80:14-Ps LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 5:39 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 5:22 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 5:28 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 7:24 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 7:26 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 25:34–35 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 25:41 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 2:4–10 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Scripture confirms free choice: Moses, the prophets, the Psalms, the Saviour's commandments and Paul all speak to us as able to keep or transgress what is commanded.
- Sources: Mic 6:8; Deut 30:15, 19; Isa 1:19–20; Ps 81:13–14 (80:14–15 LXX); Matt 5:39, 22, 28; Matt 7:24, 26; Matt 25:34–35, 41; Rom 2:4–10. Koetschau adds audire et (“to hear and”) in angle brackets.
- Rufinus's text of this section is given from Koetschau's edition (GCS 22, 1913), because the Migne scan's text here is disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns.
Topics: Ethics
Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 3.1.6 (GCS 22:201; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/3-1-6/#p-3-1-6). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-3-1-6) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).
3.1.7GCS 22:204
Verum quoniam inveniuntur in ipsis divinis scripturis quaedam verba ita posita, ut contrarium aliquid ex his posse videatur intellegi, proferentes ea in medium et secundum pietatis regulam disserentes adhibeamus eorum absolutiones, quo ex his paucis quae exponimus etiam ceterorum, quae similiter dicta sunt, quibus arbitrii potestas videtur excludi, absolutio evidens fiat. Igitur quam plurimos movent ea, quae de Pharaone a deo dicta sunt, dicente frequentius: »Ego indurabo cor Pharaonis«. Si enim a deo induratur et per hoc quod induratur delinquit, non sibi ipse existit causa delicti. Quod si ita est, non videbitur Pharao habere arbitrii libertatem, et iam consequenter asseritur quod hoc exemplo ne ceteri quidem qui pereunt ex arbitrii sui libertate causam perditionis accipiant. Sed et illud quod in Hiezechiele scriptum est, cum dicit: »Auferam eorum lapidea corda et inmittam eis carnea, ut in praeceptis meis incedant et iustitias meas custodiant«, moveat aliquem pro eo, quod a deo dari videtur vel incedere in mandatis eius vel »iustificationes ipsius custodire«, quippe si ipse id, quod obstat ad custodienda mandata, lapideum cor auferens, cor melius et sensibilius, quod nunc carneum nominatur, inmittit et inserit. Videamus autem etiam illud, quod in evangelio dominus et salvator respondit ad eos, qui quaerebant de eo »quare ad turbas in parabolis loqueretur«, quale sit; ait enim: »Ut videntes non videant, et audientes non audiant et non intellegant, ne forte convertantur, et remittatur eis«. Sed et illud, quod a Paulo apostolo dictum est quia »non volentis neque currentis, sed miserentis est dei«, et in alio loco: »Et velle et perficere ex deo est«, et item in alio: »Ergo cui vult miseretur, et quem vult indurat. Dices itaque mihi: Quid ergo adhuc culpat? Voluntati enim eius quis resistet? O homo, tu quis es, qui contra respondeas deo? Numquid dicit figmentum ei, qui se finxit: Quid me fecisti sic? aut non habet potestatem figulus luti ex eadem massa facere vas aliud quidem ad honorem, aliud autem ad contumeliam?« haec et his similia non parum videntur deterrere posse quam plurimos, ne putetur unusquisque habere sui arbitrii libertatem, sed quod ex dei voluntate vel salvari aliquis vel perire videatur.
But since there are found in the divine Scriptures themselves certain words so placed that something contrary seems able to be understood from them, let us bring them forward and, discussing them according to the rule of piety, give their solutions, so that from these few which we expound the solution of the others that are said in a similar way, by which the power of choice seems to be excluded, may become clear. Very many, then, are moved by what is said by God about Pharaoh, when he says more than once, “I will harden Pharaoh's heart.” For if he is hardened by God, and through being hardened he sins, he is not himself the cause of his sin. And if this is so, Pharaoh will not seem to have freedom of choice, and it will consequently be asserted, on the strength of this example, that the others who perish do not receive the cause of their perdition from the freedom of their own choice either. And what is written in Ezekiel, when he says, “I will take away their stony hearts and put in them hearts of flesh, that they may walk in my precepts and keep my ordinances,” might move someone, on the ground that it seems to be given by God either to walk in his commandments or to keep his ordinances, if he himself takes away the stony heart that hinders the keeping of the commandments and puts in and implants a better and more feeling heart, which is now called a heart of flesh. Let us consider also what the Lord and Saviour answered in the Gospel to those who asked him why he spoke to the crowds in parables: “That seeing they may not see, and hearing they may not hear and not understand, lest perhaps they turn and it be forgiven them.” And what was said by the apostle Paul, that “it is not of him who wills nor of him who runs, but of God who shows mercy”; and in another place, “Both to will and to accomplish are from God”; and again in another place: “So then he has mercy on whom he wills, and whom he wills he hardens. You will say to me then, Why does he still find fault? For who resists his will? O man, who are you to answer back to God? Does the thing formed say to him who formed it, Why have you made me thus? Or has not the potter power over the clay, to make from the same lump one vessel for honour and another for dishonour?” These and similar passages seem able to deter not a few from believing that each one has freedom of his own choice, and to make it seem rather that whether someone is saved or perishes depends on the will of God.
Exod 4:21 (quotation, high confidence) · Ezek 11:19–20 (quotation, high confidence) · Mark 4:12 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 9:16 (quotation, high confidence) · Phil 2:13 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 9:18–21 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Origen sets out the passages that seem to exclude free choice: the hardening of Pharaoh, the heart of flesh in Ezekiel, the parables, and Paul's words on mercy and the potter.
- Sources: Exod 4:21 and parallels; Ezek 11:19–20; Mark 4:12 (Matt 13:10); Rom 9:16; Phil 2:13; Rom 9:18–21.
- Rufinus's text of this section is given from Koetschau's edition (GCS 22, 1913), because the Migne scan's text here is disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns.
Topics: Ethics
Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 3.1.7 (GCS 22:204; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/3-1-6/#p-3-1-7). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-3-1-7) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).
3.1.8GCS 22:206
Incipiamus igitur ab his, quae ad Pharaonem dicta sunt, qui a deo dicitur induratus, ne dimitteret populum; cum quo pariter etiam apostoli ille sermo tractabitur, quo ait: »Ergo cui vult miseretur et quem vult indurat«. His enim praecipue nituntur haeretici, dicentes non esse in nostra potestate ut salvemur, sed naturas esse animarum tales, quae omni genere vel pereant vel salventur, nec ullo modo possit anima, quae malae naturae est, bona fieri, aut quae bonae naturae fuerit, mala effici. Unde aiunt et Pharaonem, quoniam naturae erat perditae, propterea indurari a deo, qui indurat eos, qui terrenae naturae sunt, miseretur autem eorum, qui spiritalis naturae sunt. Videamus ergo quale est istud quod asserunt, et interrogemus eos primo, ut respondeant nobis, si terrenae naturae, quam perditam dicunt, adserunt fuisse Pharaonem. Respondebunt sine dubio: Terrenae. Si ergo terrenae naturae erat, credere deo vel oboedire ei, resistente natura, omnino non poterat. Quodsi hoc ei inerat per naturam, quid adhuc opus erat a deo indurari cor eius, et hoc non semel sed frequenter, nisi quia utique possibile erat eum suaderi? Nec indurari ab alio diceretur nisi is, qui a se non erat durus. Quodsi ex se non erat durus, consequens est, ut nec fuerit terrenae naturae, sed talis, qui possit obstupefactus signis et virtutibus cedere. Necessarius etenim erat deo, ut pro salute multorum in ipso ostenderet virtutem suam, dum resistit plurimum et obluctatur voluntati dei, et per haec cor eius dicitur indurari. Haec autem dicta sint primo adversus illos, per quae illa eorum subruatur assertio, qua putant naturaliter fuisse perditum Pharaonem; sed et de his, quae ab apostolo Paulo dicta sunt, similiter adversum eos agemus. Quos enim indurat deus secundum opinionem vestram? Nempe eos, quos naturae perditae dicitis? quid aliud credo facturos, si non fuissent indurati? Si vero ex induratione ad perditionem veniunt, iam non naturaliter, sed ex accidentibus pereunt. Tum deinde dicite nobis, quorum miseretur deus? Nempe eorum, qui salvandi sunt? Et in quo isti secunda misericordia indigent, qui semel salvandi sunt per naturam et ad beatitudinem naturaliter veniunt? nisi quia etiam ex his ostenditur quod, quia perire eos possibile erat, idcirco misericordiam consequuntur, ut per hoc non pereant, sed veniant ad salutem et piorum regna possideant. Et haec quidem dicta sint adversum illos, qui naturas bonas vel malas, id est terrenas vel spiritales, commenticiis fabulis introducunt, ex quibus fieri dicunt, ut vel salvetur unusquisque vel pereat.
Let us begin, then, with what was said to Pharaoh, who is said to have been hardened by God so that he would not let the people go; and together with it the apostle's word will also be treated, where he says, “So then he has mercy on whom he wills, and whom he wills he hardens.” For on these above all the heretics rely, saying that it is not in our power to be saved, but that there are natures of souls such that they in every case either perish or are saved, and that in no way can a soul of evil nature become good, or one of good nature become evil. Hence they say that Pharaoh too, being of a lost nature, was for that reason hardened by God, who hardens those of earthly nature but has mercy on those of spiritual nature. Let us see, then, what it is that they assert, and let us ask them first to answer us whether they hold that Pharaoh was of the earthly nature, which they call lost. They will answer without doubt: of the earthly. If then he was of earthly nature, he could not at all believe God or obey him, since his nature resisted. But if this was in him by nature, what further need was there for his heart to be hardened by God, and not once but often, unless it was in fact possible for him to be persuaded? Nor would he be said to be hardened by another, unless he was not hard of himself. And if he was not hard of himself, it follows that he was not of earthly nature either, but such a one as could yield when struck with amazement by signs and mighty works. For God needed him, so that in him he might show his power for the salvation of many, while he resists greatly and struggles against the will of God; and through this his heart is said to be hardened. Let these things be said first against them, so that their assertion, by which they think Pharaoh was lost by nature, may be overthrown; and concerning what was said by the apostle Paul we shall deal with them in the same way. For whom does God harden, according to your opinion? Those, of course, whom you call of lost nature. What else, I ask, would they have done if they had not been hardened? But if by being hardened they come to perdition, then they no longer perish by nature but by what befalls them. Then tell us, on whom does God have mercy? On those, of course, who are to be saved. And in what do these need a second mercy, who are to be saved once for all by nature and come to blessedness naturally? Unless it is shown even from this that, because it was possible for them to perish, they therefore obtain mercy, so that through it they may not perish but come to salvation and possess the kingdom of the godly. And let this be said against those who, by their fabulous inventions, introduce good or evil natures, that is, earthly or spiritual, from which they say it comes about that each one is either saved or perishes.
Exod 4:21 (allusion, high confidence) · Rom 9:18 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Against heretics who say Pharaoh was lost by nature, Origen argues that a hardening by God and a need for mercy both presuppose that a soul could have turned either way.
- The “heretics” with fixed “earthly” and “spiritual” natures are the Valentinians and similar groups; Origen's answer is that God's hardening of Pharaoh presupposes that Pharaoh could have yielded. Sources: Exod 4:21; Rom 9:18.
- Rufinus's text of this section is given from Koetschau's edition (GCS 22, 1913), because the Migne scan's text here is disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns.
Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 3.1.8 (GCS 22:206; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/3-1-6/#p-3-1-8). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-3-1-8) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).
3.1.9GCS 22:208
Nunc vero respondendum est etiam his, qui deum legis iustum tantummodo volunt esse, non etiam bonum: quomodo putant a deo indurari cor Pharaonis, quid faciente vel quid prospiciente? Observandus est enim prospectus et intuitus dei, secundum nos quidem iusti et boni, secundum ipsos vero iusti tantummodo. Et ostendant nobis quomodo deus, quem utique et ipsi iustum fatentur, iuste faciat cor hominis indurare, ut ex ipsa induratione peccet et pereat; et quomodo in hoc dei iustitia defendetur, si ipse his causa perditionis existit, quos pro eo quod duri et increduli extiterunt, ipse postmodum iudicis auctoritate damnabit? Quid etiam culpat eum dicens: »Tu autem quoniam non vis dimittere populum meum, ecce percutiam omnia primitiva in Aegypto, etiam primitivum tuum« et quaecumque alia scripta sunt per Moysen dicta esse a deo ad Pharaonem? Necesse est enim quod omnis, qui credit vera esse ea, quae in scripturis referuntur, et ostendere vult iustum deum esse legis et prophetarum, pro his omnibus reddere rationem, quomodo per haec nihil prorsus dei iustitiae derogetur; quoniam quidem, licet bonum eum negent, iustum tamen et iudicem et mundi eum creatorem fatentur. Alius enim responsionis ordo est adversum eos, qui malignum, id est diabolum, mundi huius adserunt creatorem.
Now we must answer those as well who want the God of the law to be only just and not also good: how do they think the heart of Pharaoh is hardened by God, by what doing or by what foreseeing on his part? For the foresight and purpose of God must be kept in view, who according to us is just and good, and according to them only just. And let them show us how God, whom they too confess to be just, justly causes a man's heart to be hardened, so that from that very hardening he sins and perishes. And how will God's justice be defended in this, if he himself is the cause of perdition for those whom, because they proved hard and unbelieving, he himself will afterwards condemn with a judge's authority? Why does he also blame him, saying, “But since you will not let my people go, behold, I will strike all the firstborn in Egypt, even your firstborn,” and whatever else is written as said by God through Moses to Pharaoh? For everyone who believes that the things recorded in the Scriptures are true, and wants to show that the God of the law and the prophets is just, must give an account of all these things, showing how nothing whatever is taken away from God's justice by them; for though they deny that he is good, they nevertheless confess him to be just, and judge, and creator of the world. Another kind of answer is needed against those who assert that the evil one, that is, the devil, is the creator of this world.
Exod 4:23 (quotation, high confidence) · Exod 11:5 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Those who make the God of the law only just, not good, must explain how a just God can harden Pharaoh's heart and then condemn him.
- Sources: Exod 4:23 (cf. 11:5). Those who make the God of the law “only just, not good” are the followers of Marcion; those who make the devil creator are other dualists.
- Rufinus's text of this section is given from Koetschau's edition (GCS 22, 1913), because the Migne scan's text here is disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns.
Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 3.1.9 (GCS 22:208; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/3-1-6/#p-3-1-9). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-3-1-9) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).
3.1.10GCS 22:208
Nos vero quoniam non solum iustum, sed et bonum deum fatemur, qui per Moysen locutus est, perspiciamus diligentius, quomodo iusto bonoque conveniat quod »cor indurare« dicitur Pharaonis. Et videamus si forte possumus sequentes apostolum Paulum difficultatem rei exemplis quibusdam ac similitudinibus solvere, si ostenderimus quomodo uno eodemque opere deus »alterius quidem miseretur et alium indurat«, non hoc agens nec volens, ut »induretur« ille qui induratur; sed dum ipse benignitate sua et patientia utitur, his quidem, qui eius benignitatem et patientiam ad contemptum atque insolentiam ducunt, induratur cor, dum criminum poena differtur; hi vero, qui benignitatem et patientiam eius ad occasionem paenitentiae suae et emendationis accipiunt, misericordiam consequuntur. Ut autem evidentius quod dicimus demonstretur, utimur exemplo, quo in epistola ad Hebraeos usus est apostolus Paulus dicens: »Terra enim, quae bibit frequenter super se venientem imbrem et germinat herbam opportunam his, a quibus colitur, percipiet benedictiones a deo; quae autem profert spinas et tribulos, reproba est et maledicto proxima, cuius finis ad exustionem«. Igitur ex his quos adsumpsimus Pauli sermonibus evidenter ostenditur quod uno eodemque opere dei, quo »imbrem« terrae largitur, alia quidem terra diligenter exculta fructus adferat bonos, alia vero, quae neglegitur et inculta est, »spinas et tribulos proferat«. Et si qui quasi ex persona imbrium loquens dicat: Ego imber feci fructus bonos, et »spinas ac tribulos« ego feci: quamvis dure dici videatur, vere tamen dicitur; nisi enim imber fuerit, nec fructus nec spinae tribulique nascentur, superveniente vero pluvia utraque ex se terra producit. Sed quamvis pluviae beneficio terra germen utrumque produxerit, non tamen imbribus merito diversitas germinis adscribetur, sed ad illos iure culpa mali seminis reflectetur, qui cum possent frequenti aratro terram scindere et rastris gravibus torpentes glebas vertere et omnes inutiles radices noxii graminis amputare atque succidere cunctisque quibus cultus ille deposcit laboribus ac studiis purgata excultaque novalia venturis imbribus praeparare, hoc quidem facere neglexerunt, desidiae autem suae aptissimos fructus, »spinas ac tribulos« metent; ita ergo fit ut bonitas et aequitas imbrium super omnem terram aequaliter veniat, sed uno eodemque opere pluviae ea quidem terra, quae culta est, diligentibus utilibusque cultoribus cum benedictione fructus utiles proferat, ea vero, quae cultorum desidia obduruit, »spinas ac tribulos« germinet. Sic ergo accipiamus quod ea signa et virtutes, quae a deo fiebant, imbres quidam erant a deo desuper ministrati; propositum vero hominum et voluntates terra accipienda est vel inculta vel culta, unius quidem naturae utpote omnis terra cum terra, non tamen unius eiusdemque culturae. Ex quo fit ut uniuscuiusque propositum vel induretur virtutibus et mirabilibus dei, si incultum est et ferum ac barbarum, et semet asperius ac spinosius fiat, aut mitescat amplius ac tota mente se in oboedientiam tradat, si purgatum a vitiis fuerit et excultum.
But we, since we confess that the God who spoke through Moses is not only just but also good, let us examine more carefully how it befits the just and good God that he is said “to harden” Pharaoh's “heart.” And let us see whether, following the apostle Paul, we can perhaps solve the difficulty of the matter by some examples and comparisons, if we show how by one and the same work God “has mercy on one and hardens another,” not doing or willing this, that he who is hardened should “be hardened”; but while he uses his kindness and patience, the heart of those who turn his kindness and patience into contempt and insolence is hardened, as the punishment of their crimes is put off, while those who take his kindness and patience as an occasion for their repentance and amendment obtain mercy. To show more clearly what we are saying, we use the example which the apostle Paul uses in the Epistle to the Hebrews, saying: “For the land that drinks the rain that often comes upon it, and brings forth herbs useful to those by whom it is tilled, will receive blessings from God; but that which brings forth thorns and thistles is rejected and near to a curse, and its end is to be burned.” From these words of Paul which we have taken up, it is clearly shown that by one and the same work of God, by which he gives “rain” to the land, one land, carefully tilled, bears good fruit, while another, neglected and untilled, “brings forth thorns and thistles.” And if someone, speaking as it were in the person of the rains, should say, “I, the rain, made the good fruits, and I made the thorns and thistles,” although it seems harsh to say, it is nevertheless said truly; for unless there had been rain, neither fruits nor thorns and thistles would spring up, but when the rain comes the land produces both from itself. Yet although the land has produced both kinds of growth by the gift of the rain, the difference in what springs up will not rightly be ascribed to the rains; the blame for the bad crop will justly fall back on those who, though they could have broken up the land with frequent ploughing, turned the sluggish clods with heavy hoes, cut off and rooted out all the useless roots of noxious weeds, and prepared the fallow ground, cleansed and cultivated with all the labours and care that tillage requires, for the rains to come, neglected to do this, and will reap the fruits best suited to their idleness, “thorns and thistles.” So it comes about that the goodness and fairness of the rains come equally upon all the land, but by one and the same working of the rain the land that is cultivated brings forth useful fruits with blessing for its diligent and useful cultivators, while that which has grown hard through the idleness of its cultivators sprouts “thorns and thistles.” Let us take it thus, then: the signs and mighty works done by God were like rains ministered by God from above, while the purpose and will of human beings must be understood as the land, untilled or tilled, all of one nature, as land is all one with land, but not of one and the same cultivation. Hence each person's purpose, if it is untilled and wild and barbarous, is hardened by the mighty works and wonders of God and becomes harsher and thornier; or else it grows gentler and gives itself up with its whole mind to obedience, if it has been cleansed of vices and cultivated.
Heb 6:7–8 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 9:18 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: As one rain makes tilled land fruitful and neglected land thorny, so God's signs and patience soften some hearts and harden others according to their own cultivation.
- Source: Heb 6:7–8; Rom 9:18.
- Rufinus's text of this section is given from Koetschau's edition (GCS 22, 1913), because the Migne scan's text here is disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns.
Topics: Ethics
Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 3.1.10 (GCS 22:208; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/3-1-6/#p-3-1-10). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-3-1-10) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).
3.1.11GCS 22:212
Verum ad evidentiorem rei probationem superfluum non erit uti etiam alia similitudine: verbi causa, si qui diceret quia sol est qui constringit et qui resolvit, cum contrarium sit resolutio et constrictio. Sed non erit falsum quod dicitur, dum una eademque caloris sui virtute sol ceram quidem solvit, limum vero arefacit et stringit: non quo virtus eius aliter in limo, aliter operetur in cera, sed quod limi alia, alia cerae sit qualitas, cum utique secundum naturam unum sit, quia utrumque de terra est. Ita ergo una eademque dei operatio, quae per Moysen in signis ac virtutibus gerebatur, Pharaonis quidem duritiam arguebat, quam malitiae suae intentione conceperat, reliquorum vero Aegyptiorum, qui Israhelitis admiscebantur, oboedientiam declarabat, qui etiam cum Hebraeis pariter excessisse Aegypto referuntur. Quod vero scriptum est quia paulatim edomaretur cor Pharaonis, ut aliquando diceret: »Non longe abeatis, iter tridui abibitis, sed uxores vestras relinquite et infantes vestros et pecora vestra«, sed et si qua alia scripta sunt, per quae paulatim videtur adquiescere signis et virtutibus: quid aliud ex his indicatur, nisi quod agebat quidem in eo aliquid signorum et mirabilium virtus, non tamen tantum, quantum deberet, operabatur? Si enim talis erat induratio, qualem plurimi putant, non utique inveniretur vel in paucis adquiescere. Tropum vero vel figuram sermonis eius, qui scriptus est de induratione, etiam ex communi consuetudine exponere, puto quod non videatur absurdum. Frequenter enim benigniores quique domini ad servos, qui per multam patientiam et mansuetudinem dominorum insolentiores improbioresque fiunt, dicere solent: Ego te talem feci, ego te perdidi, mea te patientia pessimum fecit, ego tibi causa huius tam durae et pessimae mentis existo, qui te non statim per singulas culpas punio pro merito delictorum. Necesse est enim tropum nos primo vel figuram sermonis advertere et ita demum virtutem dicti intellegere nec inferre calumnias verbo, cuius interiorem sensum non diligentius exploremus. Denique Paulus apostolus evidenter de talibus tractans ait ad eum, qui permanebat in peccatis: »Aut divitias bonitatis eius ac patientiae et longanimitatis contemnis, ignorans quia benignitas dei ad paenitentiam te adducit? Secundum duritiam autem tuam et cor impaenitens thesaurizas tibi iram in die irae et revelationis iusti iudicii dei«. Quae ergo dicit apostolus ad eum, qui in peccatis est, convertamus haec ipsa nos ad Pharaonem dici, et vide si non ea etiam de ipso dici consonanter invenies, quia »secundum duritiam suam et cor impaenitens thesaurizavit« et recondidit »sibi ipsi iram in die irae«, pro eo quod numquam duritia eius ita argui et in manifestum venire potuisset, nisi signa et prodigia fuissent tam multa tamque magnifica prosecuta.
For a clearer proof of the matter it will not be superfluous to use another comparison as well: for example, if someone were to say that it is the sun that binds and loosens, although loosening and binding are contraries. Yet what he says will not be false, since by one and the same power of its heat the sun melts wax but dries and hardens mud: not that its power works one way in the mud and another in the wax, but because the quality of mud is one thing and that of wax another, although by nature they are one, since both are from the earth. So one and the same working of God, carried out through Moses in signs and mighty works, exposed the hardness of Pharaoh, which he had conceived by the intent of his malice, and showed forth the obedience of the other Egyptians who were mingled with the Israelites, who are also reported to have gone out of Egypt together with the Hebrews. As for what is written, that Pharaoh's heart was gradually tamed, so that at one time he said, “Do not go far; you shall go a three days' journey, but leave your wives and your children and your cattle,” and whatever else is written by which he seems gradually to give way to the signs and mighty works, what else is shown by these than that the power of the signs and wonders did work something in him, yet did not accomplish as much as it should have? For if his hardening were such as very many think, he would surely not be found to give way even in a few things. I think it will not seem absurd to explain the turn or figure of speech used in what is written about hardening from common usage as well. For kindlier masters often say to servants who become more insolent and wicked through their masters' great patience and gentleness: “I made you what you are; I ruined you; my patience made you very bad; I am the cause of this so hard and evil mind of yours, because I do not punish you at once for each fault as your offences deserve.” For we must first notice the turn or figure of speech, and only then understand the force of what is said, and not bring false charges against a word whose inner sense we have not examined carefully. Indeed the apostle Paul, plainly treating of such people, says to the one who remained in sins: “Or do you despise the riches of his goodness and patience and long-suffering, not knowing that the kindness of God leads you to repentance? But according to your hardness and impenitent heart you are storing up wrath for yourself on the day of wrath and of the revelation of the just judgment of God.” What the apostle says, then, to one who is in sins, let us turn and take these very words as said to Pharaoh, and see whether you do not find them fittingly said of him too, who “according to his hardness and impenitent heart stored up” and laid by “wrath for himself on the day of wrath,” since his hardness could never have been so exposed and brought to light had not signs and wonders so many and so magnificent followed.
Exod 8:28 (allusion, medium confidence) · Exod 10:24 (allusion, medium confidence) · Rom 2:4–5 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: As the sun's one heat melts wax and hardens mud, God's one working revealed Pharaoh's hardness; “I hardened” is a figure of speech, like a patient master's “I made you what you are.”
- Sources: Exod 8:28 and 10:9–11, 24 (Pharaoh's partial concessions); Rom 2:4–5.
- Rufinus, like the Greek (Philoc. 21.10–12), treats the hardening as the effect of God's patience on a heart already resistant, not as God's direct causing of sin.
- Rufinus's text of this section is given from Koetschau's edition (GCS 22, 1913), because the Migne scan's text here is disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns.
Topics: Ethics
Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 3.1.11 (GCS 22:212; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/3-1-6/#p-3-1-11). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-3-1-11) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).
3.1.12GCS 22:214
Quodsi minus plenae probationes videntur esse quas diximus, et apostolicae similitudinis parum munimenti habere adhuc videtur assertio, adhibeamus etiam propheticae auctoritatis adsensum et videamus, quid etiam prophetae pronuntient de his, qui primo quidem recte viventes benignitatis dei habere quam plurima experimenta meruerunt, postea vero ut homines deliquerunt; cum quibus se quoque unum faciens propheta ait: »Ut quid, domine, errare nos fecisti a via tua? et quare indurasti cor nostrum, uti ne timeamus nomen tuum? Convertere propter servos tuos, propter tribus hereditatis tuae, ut et nos parum aliquid hereditatis capiamus de monte sancto tuo«. Sed et Hieremias similiter dicit: »Seduxisti nos, domine, et seducti sumus; tenuisti et potuisti«. Quod ergo ait: »Ad quid, domine, indurasti cor nostrum, uti ne timeamus nomen tuum?« dictum ab his, qui misericordiam precabantur, morali utique tropo accipiendum est, velut si quis dicat: Ut quid in tantum pepercisti nobis nec requisisti nos, cum peccaremus, sed reliquisti nos, ut per hoc incresceret malum et propagaretur peccandi licentia animadversione cessante? Sic equus si non assidui sessoris ferratam patitur calcem et frenis ora serratis obteritur, indurescit. Sic puerilis aetas si nulla plagae assiduitate curvetur, insolentem simul et ad vitia praecipitem iuvenem reddet. Relinquit ergo deus et neglegit quos correptione iudicarit indignos. »Quem enim diligit dominus, corripit et castigat; flagellat autem omnem filium, quem recipit«. Ex quo arbitrandum est in filiorum iam et ordinem et affectum recipi eos, qui flagellari a deo meruerint et corripi, quo scilicet per temptationum et tribulationum patientiam possint etiam ipsi dicere: »Quis nos separabit a caritate dei, quae est in Christo Iesu? tribulatio an angustia an fames an nuditas an periculum an gladius?« Per haec enim omnia manifestatur et proditur uniuscuiusque propositum, et perseverantiae firmitas indicatur, non tam deo, qui »novit omnia antequam fiant«, quam rationabilibus caelestibusque virtutibus, quae utique procurationem salutis humanae velut quaedam adiutrices dei ministraeque sortitae sunt. Hi vero, qui nondum se tanta constantia neque tanto affectu offerunt deo neque parati sunt accedentes ad servitutem dei praeparare animas ad temptationem, »derelinqui« dicuntur a deo, id est non erudiri, pro eo quod ad erudiendum parati non sunt, in posterius sine dubio tempus eorum dispensatione vel curatione dilata. Qui utique quid a deo consequantur ignorant, nisi prius ad beneficii consequendi desiderium venerint; quod ita demum fiet, si quis ante semet ipsum quid sit agnoscat et sentiat quid sibi desit et quod deest a quo quaerere vel debeat vel possit intellegat. Qui enim non intellexerit prius infirmitatem vel aegritudinem suam, quaerere medicum nescit; vel certe cum receperit sanitatem, non erit gratus medico, qui non prius periculum sui languoris agnovit. Ita et si qui non prius animae suae vitia et peccatorum suorum cognoverit mala ac proprii oris confessione prodiderit, purgari is absolvique non poterit, ne ignoret sibi per gratiam concessum esse quod possidet et divinam liberalitatem proprium bonum putet; quae res sine dubio arrogantiam rursus animae generat et elationem, et denuo ei causa fiet ruinae. Quod etiam de diabolo sentiendum est, qui primatus suos proprios et non a deo datos esse credidit, quos habebat tunc, cum inmaculatus erat; et adimpleta est in eo illa sententia, quae dicit quod »omnis, qui se exaltat, humiliabitur«. Unde mihi videtur quod propterea »occultata sint a prudentibus et sapientibus divina mysteria«, quemadmodum et scriptura dicit: »Uti ne glorietur omnis caro in conspectu dei«, et »revelata sint parvulis«, his videlicet, qui posteaquam infantes facti fuerint et parvuli, id est ad humilitatem se et simplicitatem revocaverint parvulorum, tunc proficiunt, et cum ad perfectionem venerint, meminerunt utique quod non tam suis virtutibus, sed gratia et misericordia dei beatitudinem consecuti sunt.
But if the proofs we have given seem less than complete, and the argument from the apostle's comparison still seems to have too little support, let us add the assent of prophetic authority as well, and see what the prophets also declare about those who at first lived rightly and deserved to receive very many proofs of God's kindness, but afterwards, being human, sinned. Making himself one with them, the prophet says: “Why, O Lord, have you made us stray from your way? And why have you hardened our heart, so that we do not fear your name? Return for the sake of your servants, for the sake of the tribes of your inheritance, that we too may receive a little of the inheritance of your holy mountain.” And Jeremiah likewise says: “You deceived us, O Lord, and we were deceived; you held fast and you prevailed.” What he says, then, “Why, O Lord, have you hardened our heart, so that we do not fear your name?”, spoken by those who were praying for mercy, must be taken as a figure of speech used of conduct, as if someone were to say: “Why have you spared us so long, and not called us to account when we sinned, but left us alone, so that this evil grew and the licence to sin spread because punishment had ceased?” So a horse, if it does not feel the iron heel of a constant rider and its mouth is not worn by the jagged bit, grows hard. So boyhood, if it is not bent by constant blows, will produce a youth both insolent and headlong toward vice. God therefore abandons and neglects those whom he has judged unworthy of correction. “For whom the Lord loves he corrects and chastises, and he scourges every son whom he receives.” From this we must think that those are received into the rank and affection of sons who have deserved to be scourged and corrected by God, so that through patience in trials and tribulations they too may be able to say: “Who shall separate us from the love of God which is in Christ Jesus? Shall tribulation, or distress, or famine, or nakedness, or danger, or the sword?” For through all these each person's purpose is made manifest and brought to light, and the firmness of his perseverance is shown, not so much to God, who “knows all things before they happen,” as to the rational and heavenly powers, who have been allotted the care of human salvation as helpers and ministers of God. But those who do not yet offer themselves to God with such constancy and such love, and who, in coming to the service of God, are not ready to prepare their souls for trial, are said to be “abandoned” by God, that is, not to be instructed, because they are not ready to be instructed; their ordering or cure is without doubt put off to a later time. They certainly do not know what they will obtain from God unless they first come to desire to obtain the benefit; and this will come about only if a person first knows himself and perceives what he lacks, and understands from whom he ought or is able to seek what he lacks. For one who has not first understood his weakness or his sickness does not know how to seek a physician; or at least, when he has recovered his health, he will not be grateful to the physician, because he did not first recognize the danger of his illness. So too, if someone has not first learned the faults of his soul and the evil of his sins and made them known by the confession of his own mouth, he cannot be cleansed and absolved, lest he should not know that what he possesses was granted to him by grace, and should think the divine generosity his own good; and this without doubt breeds arrogance and pride of soul again, and becomes once more the cause of his ruin. So we must think of the devil also, who believed that the primacy he had when he was spotless was his own and not given by God; and in him was fulfilled the saying, “Everyone who exalts himself shall be humbled.” Hence it seems to me that the divine mysteries were for this reason “hidden from the prudent and wise,” so that, as Scripture says, “no flesh should glory in the sight of God,” and were “revealed to little ones,” that is, to those who, after they have become infants and little ones, that is, have brought themselves back to the humility and simplicity of little ones, then make progress; and when they come to perfection they certainly remember that they have obtained blessedness not so much by their own powers as by the grace and mercy of God.
Isa 63:17–18 (quotation, high confidence) · Jer 20:7 (quotation, high confidence) · Heb 12:6 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 8:35 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 14:11 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 11:25 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 1:29 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The prophets' “why have you hardened our heart?” means that God's sparing let sin grow; God corrects those he receives as sons and leaves others for a later cure, so that no one may think his goodness his own.
- Sources: Isa 63:17–18; Jer 20:7; Heb 12:6; Rom 8:35; Sus 42 (“who knows all things before they happen”); Luke 14:11 (cf. 18:14); Matt 11:25; 1 Cor 1:29. The horse and the undisciplined boy are Origen's own comparisons.
- Confession “by one's own mouth” is part of the argument about humility; Rufinus does not specify a church rite.
- Rufinus's text of this section is given from Koetschau's edition (GCS 22, 1913), because the Migne scan's text here is disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns.
Topics: Ethics
Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 3.1.12 (GCS 22:214; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/3-1-6/#p-3-1-12). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-3-1-12) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).
3.1.13GCS 22:217
Igitur dei iudicio derelinquitur is, qui derelinqui debet, et patientiam habet deus super nonnullis peccantibus, non tamen sine certa ratione. Sed et hoc ipsum, quod patiens est, ad utilitatem ipsorum facit, quoniam quidem immortalis est anima, cuius curam et providentiam gerit; et utique quod immortale et aeternum est, etiamsi non cito curetur, non tam excluditur a salute, quam in tempora opportuniora differtur. Nam et fortassis expedit tardius salutem consequi his, qui venenis malitiae profundioris infecti sunt. Sicut enim medici interdum cum possint celerius obducere vulnerum cicatrices, praesentem dissimulant et differunt sanitatem melioris sanitatis firmiorisque prospectu, dum melius esse norunt moram facere in tumoribus vulnerum et maligni humoris fluentes paulisper sinere meatus, quam festinare ad superficiem sanitatis et abstrusis in venis fomitem venenati humoris includere, qui utique exclusus a solitis meatibus serpet sine dubio in interiora membrorum atque ipsa vitalia viscerum penetrabit, non iam morbum corpori, sed vitae inlaturus exitium: hoc ergo modo etiam deus, qui cognoscit occulta cordis et praenoscit futura, per multam patientiam indulget fieri quaedam, quae extrinsecus incidentia hominibus provocent proferri et in lucem procedere passiones et vitia, quae celantur intrinsecus, ut per haec expurgari et curari possint hi, qui per multam neglegentiam et incuriam peccatorum in sese radices ac semina receperunt, ut eiecta foras atque ad superficiem provocata, evomi quodammodo possint et digeri; ut etiamsi videatur quis in gravioribus effici malis, dum membrorum omnium sustinet convulsiones, possit tamen cessare aliquando et desinere et satietatem capere malorum et sic ad statum suum post multas molestias reparari. Deus enim dispensat animas non ad istud solum vitae nostrae ⟨breve⟩ tempus, quod intra sexaginta fere aut si quid amplius annos concluditur, sed ad perpetuum et aeternum tempus, tamquam aeternus ipse et immortalis, immortalium quoque animarum providentiam tenens. Incorruptibilem namque fecit esse rationabilem naturam, quam et »ad imaginem suam ac similitudinem condidit«; et ideo non excluditur brevitate temporis huius vitae nostrae a cura et remediis divinis anima, quae immortalis est.
The one, then, who deserves to be abandoned is abandoned by God's judgment, and God is patient with certain sinners, though not without a definite reason. And this very fact that he is patient he does for their benefit, since the soul whose care and providence he bears is immortal; and what is immortal and eternal, even if it is not quickly healed, is not so much shut out from salvation as put off to more fitting times. And perhaps it is better for those who are infected by the poisons of a deeper malice to obtain salvation more slowly. For as physicians sometimes, though they could close the scars of wounds more quickly, hold back and postpone the immediate healing with a view to a better and firmer health, knowing that it is better to wait while wounds are swollen and to let the flowing channels of the malignant humour run for a while than to hurry to a healing of the surface and shut up in the hidden veins the fuel of a poisonous humour, which, shut out from its usual channels, will without doubt creep into the inner members and penetrate the very vital organs, bringing on the body no longer a disease but death; so in this way God too, who knows the secrets of the heart and foreknows the future, in his great patience allows certain things to happen which, befalling people from outside, draw out into the light the passions and vices hidden within, so that through these those may be cleansed and healed who through great negligence and carelessness have received into themselves the roots and seeds of sins, so that, being cast out and drawn to the surface, they may in a manner be vomited forth and dispersed; so that even if someone seems to be caught up in more grievous evils, suffering convulsions in all his members, he may yet at some time cease and stop and have his fill of evils, and so, after many troubles, be restored to his proper state. For God governs souls not only for this brief time of our life, which is enclosed within about sixty years or a little more, but for a perpetual and eternal time, since he is himself eternal and immortal and holds providence over immortal souls as well. For he made the rational nature, which he also created “after his image and likeness,” incorruptible; and therefore the soul, which is immortal, is not shut out from divine care and remedies by the shortness of this life of ours.
Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.
Gen 1:26 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: God's patience with sinners serves their healing, as a physician lets a wound drain before closing it, for God cares for immortal souls over all ages, not only this short life.
- Source: Gen 1:26.
- Rufinus's text of this section is given from Koetschau's edition (GCS 22, 1913), because the Migne scan's text here is disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns.
Topics: Ethics, Eschatology
Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 3.1.13 (GCS 22:217; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/3-1-6/#p-3-1-13). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-3-1-13) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).
3.1.14GCS 22:218
Sed adsumamus etiam de evangeliis horum quae diximus similitudines, ubi refertur esse quaedam petra habens parvam et exiguam terram, in quam si ceciderit semen, cito memoratur exoriri, sed cum exortum fuerit, quoniam »radicem« non dedit in profundum, »ascendente sole aestuare« dicitur »et arescere« quod exortum est. Quae utique petra sine dubio pro anima posita est humana, pro sui neglegentia indurata et propter malitiam saxea effecta. Nulli enim a deo »cor lapideum« creatum est, sed per malitiam unicuique et inoboedientiam lapideum cor fieri dicitur. Sicut ergo si quis increpet agricolam, quare non citius semina super terram petrosam iecerit, pro eo quod videat aliam terram petrosam accepta semina velociter germinasse, utique respondebit agricola et dicet quia idcirco tardius semino terram istam, ut possit semina quae susceperit retinere; expedit enim huic tali terrae ut posterius seminetur, ne forte citius germinata seges et e summa tenuis soli fronte procedens solis aestibus obviare non possit (nonne qui prius increpabat rationi et peritiae adquiescet agricolae et quod prius sibi videbatur inconsequens rationabiliter factum probabit?): ita ergo etiam deus, universae creaturae suae peritissimus agricola, dissimulat et differt in aliud sine dubio tempus haec, quae nobis videntur citius debuisse consequi sanitatem, ne superficies magis eorum quam interna curentur. Si vero quis nobis ad haec obiciat: Quare ergo quaedam semina cadunt etiam super petrosam terram, id est duram aliquam et saxeam animam? dicendum ad haec quia ne hoc quidem absque divinae dispensationis fieri providentia potest, quia nisi per hoc cognosceretur, quid condemnationis haberet temeritas auditus et perscrutationis inprobitas, non utique agnosceretur, quid esset utilitatis erudiri per ordinem. Et inde fit ut cognoscat anima vitium suum seque ipsa reprehendat ac consequenti se culturae reservet ac tradat, id est ut videat sibi prius vitia resecanda, tum deinde ad instructionem scientiae veniendum. Quia ergo, sicut innumerabiles sunt animae, ita et mores earum atque propositum diversique singularum motus et adpetentiae et incitamenta, quarum varietatem humana mens considerare nullatenus potest: ideo soli deo ars et potentia et scientia dispensationis huiuscemodi relinquenda est, qui solus nosse potest et remedia singularum et curationum tempus metiri. Ipse ergo, qui solus, ut diximus, agnoscit singulorum mortalium vias, scit qua via etiam Pharaonem adducere deberet, »ut per ipsum nomen suum nominaretur in universa terra«, pluribus plagis antea castigatum et usque ad submersionem maris adductum. In qua submersione non utique putandum est finitam esse erga Pharaonem providentiam dei: non enim quia demersus est, continuo etiam substantialiter interisse putandus est. »In manu enim dei et nos et sermones nostri et omnis prudentia atque operum disciplina«, sicut scriptura dixit. Verum haec pro viribus nostris disseruimus capitulum scripturae discutientes, in quo dicitur deus indurasse cor Pharaonis, et pro eo quod dictum est: »Cui ergo vult miseretur, et quem vult indurat«.
But let us take from the Gospels too comparisons for what we have said. There a certain rock is mentioned that has little and scanty soil; if seed falls on it, it is said to spring up quickly, but when it has sprung up, because it does not send its “root” deep, “when the sun rises” what has sprung up is said “to be scorched and to wither.” This rock without doubt stands for the human soul hardened by its own negligence and turned to stone by malice. For no one is given “a heart of stone” by God; but each one's heart is said to become stony through malice and disobedience. As then, if someone should blame a farmer for not casting his seed more quickly on rocky ground, because he sees that another rocky ground received seed and sprouted quickly, the farmer will surely answer and say, “I sow this ground more slowly for this reason, that it may keep the seed it receives; for it is better for such ground to be sown later, lest the crop, sprouting too quickly and coming up from the surface of a thin soil, be unable to withstand the heat of the sun” (will not the one who first found fault agree with the reasoning and skill of the farmer, and approve as reasonably done what seemed to him inconsistent?): so God too, the most skilled farmer of his whole creation, holds back and postpones to another time, without doubt, the things that seem to us to have deserved to obtain health more quickly, so that their surface may not be healed rather than what lies within. But if someone objects to this, “Why then do some seeds fall even on rocky ground, that is, on a hard and stony soul?”, we must say that not even this can happen without the providence of the divine ordering; for unless it were learned through this what condemnation rash hearing and shameless inquiry incur, it would certainly not be recognized what benefit there is in being taught in due order. And from this it comes about that the soul recognizes its fault and reproaches itself, and accordingly reserves and gives itself over to cultivation, that is, sees that its own vices must first be cut away, and that only then must it come to instruction in knowledge. Since, then, as souls are innumerable, so also their characters and purposes, and the motions, desires and incitements of each are diverse, whose variety the human mind can in no way survey, the art, power and knowledge of such an ordering must therefore be left to God alone, who alone can know the remedies of each and measure the time of their cures. He, then, who alone, as we said, knows the ways of each mortal, knows by what way he should lead Pharaoh too, “so that through him his name might be named in all the earth,” after first chastising him with many plagues and bringing him even to drowning in the sea. In this drowning we must certainly not think that God's providence toward Pharaoh came to an end; for Pharaoh must not be thought to have perished in his substance as soon as he was drowned. “For in the hand of God are both we and our words, and all prudence and skill in works,” as Scripture says. These things we have discussed as well as we could, examining the chapter of Scripture in which it is said that God hardened Pharaoh's heart, and the saying, “He has mercy on whom he wills, and whom he wills he hardens.”
Matt 13:5–6 (allusion, high confidence) · Ezek 11:19 (allusion, medium confidence) · Exod 9:16 (allusion, medium confidence) · Rom 9:18 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: As a farmer sows rocky ground late so the crop may root, God delays the healing of some souls; his providence toward Pharaoh did not end even at his drowning.
- Sources: Matt 13:5–6 (the rocky ground); Ezek 11:19; Exod 9:16 (cf. Rom 9:17, “that my name may be proclaimed in all the earth”); Wis 7:16; Rom 9:18.
- The statement that Pharaoh did not “perish in his substance” at his drowning belongs to Origen's view that God's providence continues beyond this life; it is translated as Rufinus gives it.
- Rufinus's text of this section is given from Koetschau's edition (GCS 22, 1913), because the Migne scan's text here is disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns.
Extrabiblical texts: Wis 7:16 (Wisdom of Solomon [in RC, EO, ETH canons]; quotation)
Topics: Ethics, Eschatology
Cite (SBL): Origen, Princ. 3.1.14 (GCS 22:218; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-de-principiis/3-1-6/#p-3-1-14). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-de-principiis-3-1-14) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 11, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged), divided by Koetschau's sections (GCS 22, 1913); words lost in the scan are supplied from Koetschau, and sections that the scan gives disordered or mixed with Migne's parallel columns (and 1.4.3–5, absent from Migne) are translated from Koetschau's text, as noted; compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of F. Crombie in ANF 4 (1885).