On the Trinity 1.12–1.13

Latin text: Migne, PL 42 (Latin text: Migne, Patrologia Latina, digitized by Open Greek and Latin (patrologia_latina-dev, University of Leipzig), CC BY-SA 4.0).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0). Compare: Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, series 1, vol. 3 (1887).

Show

Chapter 1

1.12PL 42:837–839

XIII, 32). Hoc enim nescit, quod nescientes facit, id est, quod non ita sciebat ut tunc discipulis indicaret: sicut dictum est ad Abraham, Nunc cognovi quod timcas Deum ( Gen. XXII, 12), id est, nunc feci ut cognosceres; quia et ipse sibi in illa tentatione probatus innotuit. Nam et illud utique di­ cturus crat discipulis tempore opportuno, de quo fu­ turo tanquam præterito loquens, ai t, Jam non dicum vos servos, sed amicos. Servus enim nescit voluntatem domini sui: vos autcm dixi amicos, qnia omnia quæcum­ que alidivi a Patre meo, nota vobis feci: quod nondum fecerat, sec! quia certo facturus erat, quasi jam fecisset loculus est. Ipsis cnim ait: Multa vobis habeo dicere; sed non potestis illa portare modo. Inter quæ intelligitur et, De die et hora. Nam ct Apostolus: Neque enim judicavi me, inquit, scire aliquid in vobis, nisi Christum Jesum, et hunc crucifixum ( I Cor. II, 2). Eis enim loqucbalur, qui capere altiora de Christi deitate non poterant. Quibus etiam paulo post dicit: Non potui vobis loqui quasi spiritualibus, sed quasi carnalibus (Id. ut, 1). Hoc ergo inter illos nesciebat, quod per illum scire non pote­ rant. Et hoc solum se scire dicebat, quod eos per Ullum scire oportebat. Denique sciebat inter perfectos, quod inter parvulos nesciebat: ibi quippe ait, Sapien­ tium loquimur inter perfectos ( Id. II, G ). Eo namque genere locutionis nescire quisque d citur quod occul­ tat, quo dicitur fossa cæca quæ ocrulia est. Neque enim aliquo genere loquuntur Sci ipturæ, quod in consuetudine humana non inveniatur; quia utique hominibus loquuntur. Secundum formam Dei dictum cst, Ante omnes colles genuit me, id est, ante omnes altitudines creaturarum; et, Ante luciferum genui te, id est, ante omnia tempora et tempo­ ralia: secundum formam autem servi dictum est, Dominus creavit me in principio viarum suarum. Quia secundum formam Dci dixit, Ego sum veritas; et secundum formam servi, Ego sum ria. Quia enim ipse primogenitus a mor­ tuis itcr fecit Ecclesiæ suae ad regnum Dei ad vitam alternam, cui caput est ad immortalita­ tcm etiam corporis, ideo creatus est in principio via­ rum Dei in opera ejus. Secundum firmani enim Dei, principium est quod et loquitur nobis (Joan. vm, 2o); in quo principio fecit Deus coelum et terram: secundum autem formam servi, Sponsus proco­ dens de thamamo suo ( Psal. XVII, 6 ). Secundum fur­ mam Dci, Primogenitus omnis creaturæ, et ipse ante omnes est, et omnia in illo constant: secundum formam servi, Ipse est caput corporis Ecclesiæ. Secundum formam Dei, Dominus est gloriæ ( I Cor. II, 8). Unde manifestum est, quod ipse glori­ ficet sanctos suos. Quos enim prædestinavit, ipsos ct vocavit; et quos vocavit, ipsos et justificavit; quos au­ tem justificavit, ipsos et glorificavit (Rom. vin, 30). De ilio quippe dictum est quod justificet impium; de illo dictum est quod sit justus et justificans. Si ergo qaos justificavit, ipsos et glorifi­ cavit, qui justificat ipse et glorificat, qui est, ui diJ, Dominus gloriæ. Secundum formam tamen servi sat­ agentibus descipulis de glorificatione sun, respondit: Sedere ad dexteram vel ad sinistram meam non eat meum dare vobis, sed quibus paralum eat a Patre meo.. 25 Quod autem paratum cst a Patre ejus, cl ab ipso Filio paratum est: quia ipsc ci Pater unum sunt. Jam enim ostendimus in bac Tri nitate per multos divinarum locutionum modo; etam dc singulis dici quod omnum est, propter inscparabI In opciationem unius cjusdemque substantiæ. Sicut et de Spiritu sancto dicit, Cum ego iero, mittam illum ad vos. Non dixit, Mittemus; sed ita quasi tautum Filius eum missurus esset, et non Pater; cnm alio loco dicat, Hæc locutus sum vobis apud vos ma­ nens; advocatus autem Spiritus sanctus, quem mittet Pater in nomine meo, ille vobis declarabit omnia. Hic rursus ita dictum est, quasi non cum missurus esset et Filius, sed tantum Pater. Sicut ergo ista, ila et illud quod ait, scd quibus paratum est a Patre meo: cum Patre se intelligi voluit parare se­ dcs gloriæ quibus vellet. Scd dicit aliquis: Illic cum de Spiritu sancto loqueretur, ita se missurum ait, ut non negaret Patrem missurum; et alio I co ila l'atrem, ut non negaret sc missurum: hic vero aperte ait, Non cst meum dare; atque ila secutus, a Patre di­ xit isla pra parata. Sed boc est quod præstruximus I secundum formam servi dictum: ut ila intelligeremus, Non cst meum dare, ac si diceretur, Non est humanæ potestatis hoc darc: ut per illud intelligatur In c dare, per quod Deus æqualis est Patri. Non est meum, in­ quit, dare, id est, non humana potestate ista do, sed quibus paratum eat a Patre meo: sed jam tn intellige, quia si omnia qua habet Pater, mea sunt, et hoc utique meum est,et cum Patre ista paravi. Narn el illud quæro, quomodo dictum sit, Si quis non audit verba mea, ego non judicabo illum. Fortassis enim ita hic dixit, Ego non judicabo illum, quemad­ modum ili, Non est meum dare. Sed quid hic sequi­ tur? Non cnim veni, inquit, ut judicem mundum, sed ut salvum faciam mundum: deinde adjungit et dicit, Qui me spirit et noM accipit verba mea, habet qui se judicet. Hic jam intelligeremus Patrem, nisi adjunge­ ret et dicerct: Verbum quod locutus sum, ipsum judi­ cabit illum in novissimo die. Quid igitur, jain lice Fi­ lius judicabit, quia dixit, Ego non judicabo illum? nee Patcr, sed verbum quod locutus est Filius? Imo audi adhuc quod sequitur: Quia ego I inquit, non ex me locutus sum, sed qui nae misit Pater, ille mandatum mihi dedit quid dicam, et quid loquar; et scio quia manda­ tum ejus vita æterna est. Quoe ergo ego loquor, ita ut dixit mihi Pater, sic loquor. Si ergo non judicat Filius, sed verbum quod loculus est Filius; ideo autem judicat verbum quod locutus est mins « quia non ex se loculus e,t Filius, sed qui misit eum Pater mandatum dedit ci quid dicat, et quid loquatur: Pater utique judicat, cujus verbum est quod locutus est Filius, atquo ipsum Verbum Patris idem ipse est Filius. Non enim aliud est mandatum Patris, aliud Verbum Patris: nam et verbum hoc appella­ vit, et mandatum. Videamus ergo ne forte qnod ait, Ego non ex me locutus sum, hoc intelligi voluerit, Ego non ex me natus sum. Si enim Verbum Patris loquitur, se ipsum loquitur, quia ipse est Verbum Patris. Plerumque enim dicit, Dedit mihi Pater: in quo vult intelligi quod eum genuerit Pater: non ut tanquam jam existenti et non habenti dederit aliquid; sed ipsum dedisse ut haberet, genuissc est ut esset. Non enim sicut creatura, ita Dei Filius ante incarna­ iioncm et ante assumptam creaturam, unigenitus per. quem facta sunt omnia, aliud est, et aliud habet: sed hoc ipsum est, quod est id quod habet. Quod illo loco manifestius dicitur, si quis ad capiendum sit idoneus, ubi ait: Sicut habet Pater vitam in semet­ ipso, ila dedit Filio vitam habere in semetipso. Neque enim j:un existenti et vitam non ha­ benti dedit ut haberet vitam in semetipso, cum eo ipso quod est, vita sit 1. Hoc est ergo, dedit Filio vi­ tam habere in semetipso, genuit Filium esse* incom­ mutabilem vitam, quod est vita æterna. Cum ergo Verbum Dei sit Filius Dci, et Filius Dei sit verul Deu et vita æterna, sicut in Epistola sua dicit Joan­ nes; etiain hic quid aliud agnoscimus, cum dicit Dominus, Verbum quod locutus sum, ipsum judicabit eum in novissimo die; et ipsum verbum, i'a. tris verbum esse dicit et mandatum Patris, ipsum­ que mandatum vitam æternam? Et scio, inquit, quia mandatum ejus Vita æterna est. Quæro itaque quomodo intelligamus, Ego non judicabo; sed verbum quod locutus sum judicabit: quod ex consequentibus apparet ila dictum, ac si diceret, Ego non judicabo; sed verbum Patris judicabit. Ver­ bum autcm Patris est ipse Filius Dei. Siccine intel­ ligendum est, Ego non judicabo, sed ego judicabo? Quomodo potest istud esse verum, nisi ita: Ego sci­ licet non judicabo ex potestate humana, quia Filius hominis sum; sed ego judicabo ex potestate Verbi, quoniam Filius Dei sum. Aut si contraria et repu­ gnantia videntur, Ego non judicabo, sed ego judi­ cabo: quid illic dicemus, ubi ait, Mea doctrina non est meu? Quomodo mea, quomodo non mea? Non enim dixit, Ista doctrina non est mea; sed, Mea doctrina non eat mea: quam dixit suam, camdem dixit non suam. Quomodo istud verum est, nisi se­ cundum aliud suam dixerit; secundum aliud, non luam: secundum formam Dei, suam; secundum for.. mam servi, non suam? Cum enim dicit, non est mea, sed ejus qui me misit (Joan. vn, 16), ad ipsum Ver­ bum nos facit recurrere. Doctrina enim Patris est Verbum Patris, qui est unicus Filius. Quid sibi et illud vult, Qui in me credit, non in me credit? Quomodo in ipsum, quomodo non in ipsum? Quomodo tam contrarium sibique adversum potest intelligi, Qui in me credit, inquit, non in me credit, sed in eum qui me misit: nisi ita intelligas, Qui in me credit, non in hoc quod videt credit, ne sit spes nostra in crea­ tura; sed in illo qui suscepit creaturam, in qua hu­ manis oculis appareret, ac sic ad se æqualcm Patri contemplandum per fidem corda mundaret? Ideoque ad Patrem referens intentionem credentium, et di­ cens, Non in me credit, sed in eum qui me misit, non utique se a Patre, id est ab illo qui eum misit, voluit separari: sed ut sic in eum crederetur, quo­ modo in Patrem cui est aequalis. Quod aperte alio loco dicit, Credite1 in Deum, et in me credite (Joan. XIV, ): id est, Sicut creditis in Deum, sic et in me; quia ego et Pater unus Dens. Sicuti ergo hic, tanquam absta­ lit a se fidem hominum, et in Patrem transtulit, die cendo, iVon in me credit, sed in eum qui me misit, a quo tamen se utique non separavit: sic etiam quod ait, Non est meum dare, sed quibus paratum cst a Putre meo, puto clarere secundum quid utrumquc accipien­ dum sit. Tale est euim et illud, Ego non judicabo; cum ipse judicaturus sit vivos et mortuos: sed quia non ex potestate humana, prop:erea re­ currens ad dcitatem, sursum erigit corda hominum, propter quæ sublevanda descendit.

["But of that day and hour no one knows, neither the angels in heaven nor the Son, but only the Father" (Mark 13:32).] For he is ignorant of this in that he makes others ignorant of it; that is, he did not know it in such a way as to show it to the disciples at that time; as it was said to Abraham, "Now I know that you fear God," that is, "Now I have made you know it," because in that trial Abraham, being tested, came to know himself. For he was certainly going to tell this too to the disciples at the right time; speaking of that future as though it were past, he says, "I no longer call you servants, but friends. For the servant does not know the will of his master; but I have called you friends, because all that I have heard from my Father I have made known to you"; which he had not yet done, but because he was certainly going to do it, he spoke as if he had already done it. For he says to them, "I have many things to say to you, but you cannot bear them now." Among these is understood also "the day and the hour." For the Apostle too says, "For I decided to know nothing among you except Christ Jesus, and him crucified." For he was speaking to those who could not grasp higher things about the deity of Christ. To them he also says a little later, "I could not speak to you as spiritual, but as carnal." Among them, then, he did not know what they could not know through him; and he said that he knew only what it was fitting for them to know through him. In short, he knew among the perfect what he did not know among little ones; for there he says, "We speak wisdom among the perfect." For by that manner of speaking a person is said not to know what he hides, by which a ditch that is hidden is called blind. For the Scriptures use no manner of speaking that is not found in human usage, since they certainly speak to human beings. According to the form of God it is said, "Before all the hills he begot me," that is, before all the heights of created things; and, "Before the morning star I begot you," that is, before all times and temporal things. But according to the form of a servant it is said, "The Lord created me in the beginning of his ways." For according to the form of God he said, "I am the truth"; and according to the form of a servant, "I am the way." For because he himself, the firstborn from the dead, made a way for his Church to the kingdom of God, to eternal life, being its head unto the immortality even of the body, therefore he was created in the beginning of the ways of God for his works. For according to the form of God he is the beginning, who also speaks to us, the beginning in which God made heaven and earth; but according to the form of a servant, "a bridegroom coming out of his chamber." According to the form of God, "the firstborn of every creature, and he is before all things, and in him all things hold together"; according to the form of a servant, "he is the head of the body, the Church." According to the form of God, he is the Lord of glory. From this it is plain that he himself glorifies his saints. For "those whom he predestined he also called; and those whom he called he also justified; and those whom he justified he also glorified." For of him it is said that he justifies the ungodly; of him it is said that he is just and the justifier. If, then, those whom he justified he also glorified, he who justifies also glorifies, he who is, as I said, the Lord of glory. Yet according to the form of a servant, when the disciples were busy about their own glorification, he answered: "To sit at my right hand or at my left is not mine to give you, but it is for those for whom it has been prepared by my Father." But what has been prepared by his Father has also been prepared by the Son himself, because he and the Father are one. For we have already shown, by many modes of divine speech, that in this Trinity what belongs to all is said even of each, because of the inseparable working of one and the same substance. So too he says of the Holy Spirit, "When I go, I will send him to you." He did not say, "We will send," but spoke as though the Son alone were to send him and not the Father; whereas in another place he says, "These things I have spoken to you while remaining with you; but the Advocate, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, he will make all things plain to you." Here again it is said as though the Son were not to send him too, but only the Father. As with these, then, so also with what he says, "but for those for whom it has been prepared by my Father": he wished it to be understood that he, together with the Father, prepares seats of glory for whom he wills. But someone says: "There, when he was speaking of the Holy Spirit, he said that he would send him without denying that the Father would send him; and in the other place he spoke of the Father without denying that he himself would send him; but here he says openly, 'It is not mine to give,' and so went on to say that these things had been prepared by the Father." But this is what we laid down beforehand: that it was said according to the form of a servant, so that we should understand "It is not mine to give" as if it were said, "It is not in human power to give this," so that it may be understood that he gives it by that in which, as God, he is equal to the Father. "It is not mine," he says, "to give," that is, "I do not give these things by human power, but they are for those for whom it has been prepared by my Father; but now understand that if all that the Father has is mine, this too is certainly mine, and I have prepared these things together with the Father." For I also ask how it is said, "If anyone does not hear my words, I will not judge him." For perhaps he said, "I will not judge him," here in the same way as there, "It is not mine to give." But what follows here? "For I did not come to judge the world," he says, "but to save the world." Then he adds and says, "He who despises me and does not receive my words has one who judges him." Here we would now understand the Father, had he not added and said, "The word that I have spoken will itself judge him on the last day." What then? Will neither the Son judge now, since he said, "I will not judge him," nor the Father, but the word which the Son has spoken? Rather, hear further what follows: "For I," he says, "have not spoken from myself, but the Father who sent me has himself given me a commandment, what I should say and what I should speak; and I know that his commandment is eternal life. What I speak, therefore, I speak just as the Father has told me." If, then, the Son does not judge, but the word which the Son has spoken, and if the word which the Son has spoken judges for this reason, that the Son has not spoken from himself, but the Father who sent him gave him a commandment what he should say and what he should speak, then surely the Father judges, whose word it is that the Son has spoken; and the Word of the Father is himself the very Son. For the commandment of the Father is not one thing and the Word of the Father another; for he has called it both word and commandment. Let us see, then, whether by saying, "I have not spoken from myself," he perhaps wished this to be understood: "I was not born from myself." For if he speaks the Word of the Father, he speaks himself, since he is himself the Word of the Father. For he very often says, "The Father has given me," by which he wishes it to be understood that the Father begot him: not that he gave something to one already existing and not having it, but that to have given him to have is to have begotten him to be. For the Son of God, the only-begotten through whom all things were made, before the incarnation and before he took the creature, is not, as a creature is, one thing and has another; but he is the very thing that he has. This is said more plainly, if anyone is able to grasp it, in that place where he says, "As the Father has life in himself, so he has granted the Son to have life in himself." For he did not give him, as one already existing and not having life, to have life in himself, since by the very fact that he is, he is life. This, then, is "he has granted the Son to have life in himself": he begot the Son to be unchangeable life, which is eternal life. Since, then, the Word of God is the Son of God, and the Son of God is true God and eternal life, as John says in his Epistle, what else do we recognize here too, when the Lord says, "The word that I have spoken will itself judge him on the last day," and says that this word is the Father's word and the Father's commandment, and that commandment itself eternal life? "And I know," he says, "that his commandment is eternal life." I ask, therefore, how we are to understand "I will not judge, but the word that I have spoken will judge," which from what follows appears to be said as if he said, "I will not judge, but the Word of the Father will judge." But the Word of the Father is the Son of God himself. Are we, then, to understand it thus: "I will not judge, but I will judge"? How can this be true except in this way: "I, that is, will not judge by human power, because I am the Son of Man; but I will judge by the power of the Word, because I am the Son of God"? Or if "I will not judge, but I will judge" seem contrary and conflicting, what shall we say of that place where he says, "My teaching is not mine"? How is it mine, how not mine? For he did not say, "This teaching is not mine," but "My teaching is not mine": the same that he called his own he called not his own. How is this true unless he called it his own in one respect and not his own in another: his own according to the form of God, not his own according to the form of a servant? For when he says, "It is not mine, but his who sent me," he makes us go back to the Word itself. For the teaching of the Father is the Word of the Father, who is the only Son. What also does this mean: "He who believes in me does not believe in me"? How in him, how not in him? How can a saying so contrary and opposed to itself be understood, "He who believes in me," he says, "does not believe in me, but in him who sent me," unless you understand it thus: "He who believes in me does not believe in what he sees," so that our hope may not be in a creature, but in him who took the creature in which he might appear to human eyes, and so cleanse hearts by faith to contemplate him as equal to the Father? And so, in directing the attention of believers to the Father and saying, "does not believe in me, but in him who sent me," he certainly did not wish to be separated from the Father, that is, from him who sent him, but that he should be believed in just as the Father, to whom he is equal. He says this openly in another place: "Believe in God, believe also in me"; that is, "As you believe in God, so also in me, because I and the Father are one God." Just as here, then, he seemed to take men's faith away from himself and transfer it to the Father, saying, "does not believe in me, but in him who sent me," though he certainly did not separate himself from him, so also with what he says, "It is not mine to give, but it is for those for whom it has been prepared by my Father," I think it is clear in what respect each is to be taken. Such too is "I will not judge," though he himself is to judge the living and the dead; but because he will not judge by human power, he goes back to the deity and so lifts up the hearts of men, for whose raising up he came down.

Mark 13:32 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 22:12 (quotation, high confidence) · John 15:15 (quotation, high confidence) · John 16:12 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 2:2 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 3:1 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 2:6 (quotation, high confidence) · Prov 8:25 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 110:3 (109:3 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · Prov 8:22 (quotation, high confidence) · John 14:6 (quotation, high confidence) · Col 1:18 (quotation, high confidence) · John 8:25 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 1:1 (allusion, high confidence) · Ps 19:5 (18:6 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · Col 1:15 (quotation, high confidence) · Col 1:17 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 2:8 (allusion, high confidence) · Rom 8:30 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 4:5 (allusion, high confidence) · Rom 3:26 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 20:23 (quotation, high confidence) · John 10:30 (allusion, high confidence) · John 16:7 (quotation, high confidence) · John 14:25 (quotation, high confidence) · John 14:26 (quotation, high confidence) · John 16:15 (allusion, high confidence) · John 12:47 (quotation, high confidence) · John 12:48 (quotation, high confidence) · John 12:49 (quotation, high confidence) · John 12:50 (quotation, high confidence) · John 5:26 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 John 5:20 (allusion, high confidence) · John 7:16 (quotation, high confidence) · John 12:44 (quotation, high confidence) · John 14:1 (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Tim 4:1 (allusion, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Augustine explains, by his rule of the two forms, sayings in which Christ seems to deny knowledge of the last day, the power to give places of glory, his own judgment, his own teaching, and faith in himself.

  • The digital text begins this chapter in the middle of the reference '(Marc. XIII, 32)'; the opening quotation of Mark 13:32 has been lost in the digitization and is supplied in brackets from the sense and the reference.
  • Quotations: Mark 13:32; Gen 22:12; John 15:15; John 16:12; 1 Cor 2:2; 1 Cor 3:1; 1 Cor 2:6; Prov 8:25; Ps 110:3 (Ps 109:3 Vulgate/LXX); Prov 8:22; John 14:6; Col 1:18; John 8:25; Gen 1:1; Ps 19:5 (Ps 18:6 Vulgate); Col 1:15, 17–18; 1 Cor 2:8; Rom 8:30; Rom 4:5; Rom 3:26; Matt 20:23; John 10:30; John 16:7; John 14:25–26; John 16:15; John 12:47–50; John 5:26; 1 John 5:20; John 7:16; John 12:44; John 14:1; 2 Tim 4:1.
  • 'The beginning, who also speaks to us' follows the Old Latin of John 8:25 (Principium, quia et loquor vobis).
  • 'Before the morning star I begot you' is the Latin (from the LXX) of Ps 110:3.

Topics: Christology, Trinity

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Trin. 1.12 (PL 42:837–839; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-trinitate/1-12/#p-1-12). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-trinitate-1-12) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text of the Open Greek and Latin project); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation in NPNF¹ 3 (1887).

1.13PL 42:839–845

Nisi tamen ipse idem esset Filius hominis propter formam servi quam accepit, qui est Filius Dei pro­ pter Dei formam in qua est; non diceret Paulus apo­ stolus de principibus hujus sreculi: Si enim cogno­ vissent, nunquam Dominum gloriæ crucifixissent. Ex forma enim servi crucifixus est, et tamen Dominus gloriæ crucifixus est. Talis enim erat illa susceptio, quu Deum hominem Taceret, et hominem Deum. Quid tamen propter quid, et quid secundum quid dicatur, adjuvante Domino prudens,et dili­ gens, et pius lector intelligit. Natu ecce diximus quia secundum id quod Deus est, glorificat suos, secun­ dum hoc utique quod Dominus gloriae est; et tamen Dominus gloriæ crucifixus est, quia recte dicitur et Deus crucifixus, non ex virtute divinitatis, sed ex in­ firmitate carnis (II Cur. xin, 4): sicut dicimus,quia secundum id quod Deus est judicat, hoc est ex pote­ state divina, non ex humana; et tamen ipse homo judicaturusest, sicut Dominus gloriæ crucifixus est: ita enim aperte dicit, Cum venerit Filius hominis in gloria sua, et omnes Angeli cum eo, tunc congregabuntur ante eum omnes gentes; et cæ­ tera quae de futuro judicio usque ad ultimam senten­ tiam in eo loco praedicantur. Et Judaei, quippe qui ia malitia perseverantes, in illo judicio puniendi sunt, sicuti alibi scriptum est, videbunt in quem pupugerunt (Zach. xn, 10). Cum enim et boni etmali visuri sint judicem vivorum et mortuorum, procul dubio euro videre mali non poterunt, nisi secundum formam qua filius hominis est; sed tamen in claritate in qua jui dicabit, non in humilitate in qua judicatus est. Cae­ terum illam Dei formam in qua æqualis est Patri v procul dubio impii non videbunt. Non enim sunt mundicordes: Beati enim mundicordes, quoniam ipsi Deum videbunt. Et ipsa visio est facie ad faciem, quæ 1 summum præmium promiltitur justis; et ipsa fiet, cum tradet regnum Deo et Patri; in quo et suæ formæ visionem vult in­ telligi, subjecta Dco universa creatura, et ipsa in qua Filius Dei filius bominis facius est. Quia secundum hanc et ipse Filius tunc subjectus illi erit, qui ei subje­ cit omnia, ut sit Deus omnia in omnibus. Alioquin si Filius Dei judex in forma qua æqua­ lis est Patri, etiam impiis cum judicaturus est appa­ rebit, quid est quod pro magno dilectori suopollicetur dicens, Et ego diligam eum, et ostendam me ipsum illi? Quapropter Filius hominis judicatu­ rus est, nec tamen ex humana potestate, sed ex ea qua Filius Dei est: et rursus Filius Dei judicaturus cst, nec tamen in ea forma apparens, in qua Deus est æqualis Patri, sed in ea qua filius hominis est. Itaque utrumque dici potest; et, Filius bominis judicabit; et, Non Filius hominis judicabit: quia Fi­ lius hominis judicabit, ut verum sit quod ait, Cum venerit Filias hominis, tunc congregabuntur ante eum omnes gentes; et non Filius hominis judicabit, ut ve­ rum sit quod ait, Ego non judicabo Id.in, 47 ); et, Ego non quæro gloriam meam; eat qui quærat, et judicet. Nam secundum id quod in judicio noa forma Dei, sed forma filii bominis apparebit, nec ipse Pater judicabit; secundum hoc enim dictum est, Pater non judicat quemquam, aed omne judicium dedit Filio. Quod utrum ex illa locutione dictum sit, quam supra commemoravimus, ubi ait, Sic dedit Filio ha­ bere vitam in semetipso, ut signifi­ caret quia sic genuit Filium: an ex illa de qua loquitur I Apostolus dicens, Propter quod eum suscitavit 3,et do­ navit illi nomen quod eat super omne nomen. Hoc enim de filio hominis dictum est, secundum quem Dei Fi­ lius excitatus est a mortuis. Ille quippe in forma Dei æqualis Patri, ex quo * se exinanivit, formam servi accipiens, in ipsa forma servi et agit, et patitur, et accipit, quæ consequenter contexit Apostolus: Humi­ liavit se, factus obediens usque ad mortem, mortem au­ tem crucis: propter quod et Deus illum exaltavit, et donavit ei nomen, quod est super omne nomen, ut in nomine Jcsu omne genu flectatur, cælestium, terre­ strium et infernorum, et omnis lingua confiteatur quia Dominus Jesua Christus in gloria eat Dei Patris ( Phi­ lipp. II, 6-11 ). Utrum ergo secundum illam, an se­ cundum istam locutionem dictum sit, Omne judi­ tium dedit Filio, satis hinc apparet, quia si secun­ dnm illud diceretur secundum quod dictum est, Dedit Filio habere vitam in semetipso; non utique diceretur, Pater non judicat quemquam. Secundum hoc enim quod æqualem Pater genuit Filium, judicat cum illo. Secundum hoc ergo dictum est, quod in judicio, non forma Dei, sed forma filii hominis apparebit. Non quia non judicabit qui dedit omne judicium Filio, cum de illo dicat Filius, Est qui quærat, et judicet: sed ila est dictum I Pater non judicat quemquam, des omne judicium dedit Filio; ac si diceretur, Patrem nemo videbit in judicio vivorum et mortuorum, sed omnes Filium: quia et filius bominis est, ut possit et ab impiis videri, cum et illi videbunt ill quem pu­ pugeruut. Quod ne conjicere potius quam aperte demon­ strare videamur, proferamus ejusdem Domini certam manifestamque sententiam, qua ostendamus ipsam fuisse causam ut diceret, Pater non judicat quemquam, sed omne judicium dedit Filio, quia judex in forma filii hominis apparebit, quæ forma non est Patris, sed Filii; nec ea Filii in qua aequalis est Patri, sed in qua minor est Patre; ut sit in judicio conspicuus et bonis et malis. Paulo enim post dicit: Amen dico vo­ bis, quia qui verbum meum audit et credit ei qui mi­ sit me, habet vitam aeternam, et in judicium non veniet, sed transiet a morte in vitam. Hæc vita æterna est illa visio, quæ non pertinct ad malos. Deinde sequitur: Amen, amen dico vobis, quia veniet 1hora, et nunc est, cum mortui audient vocem Filii Dei, et qui audierint vivent. Et boc proprium est piorum qui sic audiunt de incarnatione ejus, ut credant, quia Filius Dei est; id est, sic eum propter se iactum accipiunt minorem Patre in forma servi, ut credant quia æqualis est Pa­ tri in forma Dei. Et ideo sequitur, et hoc ipsum com­ mendans dicit: Sicut enim Pater habet vitam in semet­ ipso, ita dedit et Filio vitam habere in semetipso. Deinde venit ad visionem suae claritatis, in qua ven­ turus est ad judicium; quae visio communis erit et irnpiis et justis. Sequitur enim et dicit: Et potestatem dedit ei et 2 judicium facere, quoniam Filius hominis est. Puto nihil esse manifestius. Nam quia Filius Dei est aequalis Patri, non accipit hanc potestatem judicii faciendi, sed habet illam cum Patre in occulto: acci­ pit autem iliam, ut boni et mali eum videant judican­ tem, quia filius hominis est. Visio quippe filii homi­ nis exhibebitur et malis: nam visio formæ Del non­ nisi mundis corde, quia ipsi Deum videbunt; id est, solis piis quorum dilectioni hoc ipsum promittit, quia se ipsum ostendet illis. Et ideo vide quid sequatur: Nolite mirari hoc, inquit. Quid nos probibet mirari, nisi illud quod revera miratur omnis qui non intelli­ git, ut ideo diceret Patrem dedisse ei potestatem et judicium facere, quia filius bominis est; cum magis quasi hoc exspectaretur ut diceret, quoniam Filius Dei est! Sed quia Filium Dei secundum id quod in forma Dei aequalis est Patri videre iniqui non pos­ sunt; oportet autem ut judicem vivorum et mortuo­ rum, cum coram judicabuntur, et justi videant ei itnnui: Nolite, inquit, hoc mirari, quoniam veniet nora, in qua omnes qui in monumentis sunt, audient rocemejus: et prodicnt qui bona gesserunt, in resur­ rectionem vitæ; qui autem mala gesseruut, in resur- I rectionem judicii.Ad hoc ergo opor­ tebat ut ideo acciperet illam potestatem, quia filius hominis est, tIt resurgentes omnes viderent cum in forma, in qua vidcri ab omnibus potest, sed alii ad damnationem, alii ad vitam æternam. Quæ est autem viia æterna nisi illa visio, quæ non conceditur impiis? Ut cognoscant te, inquit, unum verum Deum, et quan misisti Jesum Christum. Quomodo et ipsum Jesum Christum, nisi quemadmodum unum virum Deum, qui ostendet se ipsum illis; non quomodo sc ostendet etiam puniendis in forma filii bominis? Secundum illam visionem bonus esi, secundum quam visionem Deus apparet mundis corde: quoniam, Quam bonus Deus 'srael rectis corde! Quando autcm judicem videbunt mali, non eis vidcbi­ tur bonus; quia non ad eum gaudebunt corde, sed tunc se plangent omnes tribus lerrac, in numero uliquc malorum omuium ct infidclium. Propter hoc ctiam illi qui eum dixcrat magistrum bonum, quærenti ab eo consilium consequendæ vitæ æternæ, respondit: Quid me interrogas de bono? Nemo bonus, nisi unus Deus. Cum et bomincm alio Joco dicat bonum ipse Dommus: Bonus homo, inquit,. de bono thesauro cordis sui profert bona; et malus homo de malo thesauro cordis sui profert mala. Sed quia ille vitam æternam quærebat, viia autem æterna est in illa contemplatione, qua non ad poenam videtur Deus, sed ad gaudium sempiternum; et non intelligebat cum quo loquebatur, qui tantummodo eum filium hominis arbitrabatur: Quid me interrogas, iuquit, de bono? id est, Istam formam quam vides, quid interrogas de bono, et vocas me secundum quod vides magistrum bonum? Hæc forma filii bominis est, hæc forma accepta est, hæc forma apparebit in judicio, non tantum justis, sed et impiis; et bujus formae visio non erit in bonum cis qui male agunt. Est autem visio formæ meae, in qua cum essem, non rapinam arbitratus sum esse aequalis Deo, sed ut hanc accipe­ rem me ipsum exinanivi (Philipp. n, 6, 7). Ille ergo unus Deus Pater et Filius et Spiritus sanctus, qui non apparebit nisi ad gaudium quod non auferetur a justis; cui gaudio futuro suspirat qui dicit, Unam petii a Do­ mino, hanc requiram; ut inhabitem in domo Domini per omnes diu vitæ meæ, ut contempler delectationem Do­ mini: unus ergo Deus ipse est solus bonus, ob hoc I, quia nemo eum videt ad luctum et planctum, sed tantum ad salutem et Lætitiam veram..Secundum illam formam si me intelligis, bonus sum: si autem secundum bane solam, quid me interrogas de bono? si inter illos es2 qui videbunt in quem pupugerunt ( Zach. XII, 10); et ipsa visio malum cis erit, quia pœnalis crit. Ex ista sententia dixisse 1 Dominum Quid me interrogas de bono? Nemo bonus, nisi unus Deus, his documentis quæ commemoravi probabile est, quia,.baio illa Dei qua contemplabimur incommu­ tabilem atque Immanis oculis invisibilem Dci substan. tiam, quæ solis sanctis promittitur, quam dicit aposto­ lus Paulus, facie ad faciem; et de qua dicit apostolus Joannes, Similes ei erimus, quo­ niam videbimus cum sicuti est; el de qua dicitur, Unam petii a Domino, ut contempler delecta­ tionem Domini; ct de qua dicit ipse Dominus, Et ego diligam eum, et ostendam me ipsum illi; et propter quam solam fide corda mundamus, ut simus beuti mundicordes, quoniam ipsi Deum videbunt; et si qua alia de ista visione dicta sunt, quæ copiosissime sparsa per omnes Scripturas inve­ nit quisquis ad cam quærendam oculum amoris inten­ dit: sola cst summum bonum nostrum, cujus adi­ piscendi causa præcipimur agere quidquid recte agimus. Visio vero illa filii hominis quae prænuntiata est, cum congregabuntur ante eum omnes gentes, et dicent ei, Domine, quando te vidimus esurientem et sitien­ tem? et cætera, nee bonum erit impiis qui mittentur in ignem æternum, nee summum bonum erit justis. Adhuc enim vocateos ad regnum, quod eis paratum est ab ini­ tio mundi. Sicut enim illis dicet, lle in ignem æternum; ita istis, Venite, benedicti Patris mei, possidete paratum vobis regnum. Et sicut ibunt illi in ambustionem aeternam; sic justi in vitam æternam. Quid est autem vita æterna, nisi, ut cognoscant te, in. quit, unum verum Deum, et quem misisti Jesum Christum? Sed jam in ea claritate de qua dicit Patri, Quam habui apud te, priusquam mundus fieret. Tunc cnim tradet regnum Deo et Patri, ut intret servus bonus in gaudium Domini sui, et abscondat eos quos possidet Deus in abscondito vultus sui a conturbatio e hominum, eorum scilicet qui tunc conturbabuntur audientes i!­ lam sententiam: a quo auditu malo justus non timebit, si modo protegatur in tabernaculo, id est in fide recta catholicae Ecclesiæ, a contradictione linguarum, id est a calumniis hæ­ ri ticorum. Si vero est alius intellectus verborum Do­ mini quibuS ait, Quid me interrogas de bono? Nemo bonus, nisi unus Deus; dum tamen non ideo credatur majoris bonitatis esse Patris quam Filii substantia, secundum quam Verbum est per quod facta sunt omnia, nihilque abhorret a sana doctrina: securi utamur, non uno tantum, sed quotquot reperiri potuerint. Tanto enim fortius convincuntur hæretici, quanto plures exitus patent ad eornm laqueos evilan dos. Sed ea quae adhuc consideranda sunt, ab alio jam petamus exordio.

Yet unless the same one were the Son of Man on account of the form of a servant which he took, who is the Son of God on account of the form of God in which he is, the apostle Paul would not say of the rulers of this age, "For if they had known, they would never have crucified the Lord of glory." For he was crucified in the form of a servant, and yet it was the Lord of glory who was crucified. For such was that taking up, which made God man and man God. Yet what is said on account of what, and what is said according to what, the prudent, diligent, and devout reader understands with the Lord's help. For see, we have said that according to that by which he is God he glorifies his own, that is, according to that by which he is the Lord of glory; and yet the Lord of glory was crucified, because God too is rightly said to have been crucified, not by the power of the divinity but by the weakness of the flesh. In the same way we say that according to that by which he is God he judges, that is, by divine power, not by human; and yet the man himself will judge, just as the Lord of glory was crucified. For so he says plainly: "When the Son of Man comes in his glory, and all the angels with him, then all nations will be gathered before him," and the rest that is foretold in that place about the coming judgment, up to the final sentence. And the Jews, those of them, that is, who persevere in malice and are to be punished in that judgment, "will look on him whom they pierced," as it is written elsewhere. For since both the good and the wicked will see the judge of the living and the dead, without doubt the wicked will not be able to see him except according to the form by which he is the Son of Man; yet in the brightness in which he will judge, not in the lowliness in which he was judged. But that form of God, in which he is equal to the Father, the ungodly will without doubt not see. For they are not pure in heart; and "blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God." And that vision is face to face, which is promised to the righteous as the highest reward; and it will take place when he hands over the kingdom to God the Father, in which he wishes the vision of his own form also to be understood, the whole creation being subjected to God, including the very creature in which the Son of God was made the Son of Man. For according to this the Son himself will then be subjected to him who subjected all things to him, so that God may be all in all. Otherwise, if the Son of God as judge, in the form in which he is equal to the Father, will appear even to the ungodly when he is to judge, what is it that he promises as something great to the one who loves him, saying, "And I will love him and will show myself to him"? Therefore the Son of Man will judge, yet not by human power but by that by which he is the Son of God; and again the Son of God will judge, yet not appearing in that form in which he is God equal to the Father, but in that by which he is the Son of Man. And so both can be said: "The Son of Man will judge" and "The Son of Man will not judge": the Son of Man will judge, so that what he says may be true, "When the Son of Man comes, then all nations will be gathered before him"; and the Son of Man will not judge, so that what he says may be true, "I will not judge," and "I do not seek my own glory; there is one who seeks it and judges." For in this respect, that in the judgment not the form of God but the form of the Son of Man will appear, not even the Father himself will judge; for in this respect it is said, "The Father judges no one, but has given all judgment to the Son." Whether this is said in the manner of that expression we recalled above, where he says, "So he has granted the Son to have life in himself," to signify that he so begot the Son; or in the manner of that of which the Apostle speaks, saying, "Therefore he raised him up and gave him the name that is above every name." For this is said of the Son of Man, according to which the Son of God was raised from the dead. For he who in the form of God is equal to the Father, from the time he emptied himself, taking the form of a servant, in that very form of a servant both acts, and suffers, and receives what the Apostle goes on to set out in order: "He humbled himself, becoming obedient to death, even death on a cross; therefore God also exalted him and gave him the name that is above every name, that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of those in heaven, on earth, and under the earth, and every tongue confess that the Lord Jesus Christ is in the glory of God the Father." Whether, then, "has given all judgment to the Son" is said according to the former or according to the latter expression is clear enough from this: that if it were said in the sense in which it is said, "He has granted the Son to have life in himself," it would certainly not be said, "The Father judges no one." For in this respect, that the Father begot the Son equal to himself, he judges together with him. It is said, therefore, in this respect: that in the judgment not the form of God but the form of the Son of Man will appear. Not that he who has given all judgment to the Son will not judge, since the Son says of him, "There is one who seeks it and judges"; but "The Father judges no one, but has given all judgment to the Son" is said as if it were said, "No one will see the Father in the judgment of the living and the dead, but all will see the Son"; because he is also the Son of Man, so that he can be seen even by the ungodly, since they too will look on him whom they pierced. Lest we seem to conjecture this rather than to show it plainly, let us bring forward a certain and clear statement of the same Lord, by which we may show that this was the very reason he said, "The Father judges no one, but has given all judgment to the Son": because the judge will appear in the form of the Son of Man, which form is not the Father's but the Son's, and not that form of the Son in which he is equal to the Father, but that in which he is less than the Father, so that in the judgment he may be visible to both good and wicked. For a little later he says: "Truly I say to you, he who hears my word and believes him who sent me has eternal life, and does not come into judgment, but passes from death to life." This eternal life is that vision which does not belong to the wicked. Then it follows: "Truly, truly I say to you, the hour is coming, and now is, when the dead will hear the voice of the Son of God, and those who hear will live." And this is proper to the godly, who so hear of his incarnation as to believe that he is the Son of God; that is, they so accept him, made for their sake less than the Father in the form of a servant, as to believe that he is equal to the Father in the form of God. And so it follows, and commending this very point he says: "For as the Father has life in himself, so he has granted the Son also to have life in himself." Then he comes to the vision of his brightness, in which he will come to judgment; and this vision will be common to the ungodly and the righteous. For it follows and he says: "And he has given him authority to execute judgment also, because he is the Son of Man." I think nothing is plainer. For because he is the Son of God, equal to the Father, he does not receive this authority to execute judgment, but has it with the Father in secret; but he receives it so that the good and the wicked may see him judging, because he is the Son of Man. For the sight of the Son of Man will be shown to the wicked too; but the sight of the form of God only to the pure in heart, for they shall see God; that is, only to the godly, to whose love he promises this very thing, that he will show himself to them. And so see what follows: "Do not marvel at this," he says. What does he forbid us to marvel at, except that at which everyone who does not understand does in fact marvel, that he should say the Father gave him authority to execute judgment also for this reason, that he is the Son of Man, when one might rather have expected him to say, "because he is the Son of God"? But since the wicked cannot see the Son of God according to that in which, in the form of God, he is equal to the Father, and yet it is necessary that both the righteous and the wicked should see the judge of the living and the dead when they are judged before him, "Do not marvel at this," he says, "for the hour is coming in which all who are in the tombs will hear his voice, and will come out, those who have done good to the resurrection of life, but those who have done evil to the resurrection of judgment." For this purpose, then, it was necessary that he should receive that authority for this reason, that he is the Son of Man, so that all who rise might see him in the form in which he can be seen by all, but some to condemnation, others to eternal life. And what is eternal life but that vision which is not granted to the ungodly? "That they may know you," he says, "the one true God, and Jesus Christ whom you have sent." And how know Jesus Christ himself, except as the one true God who will show himself to them, not as he will show himself, in the form of the Son of Man, even to those who are to be punished? According to that vision he is good, the vision in which God appears to the pure in heart; for "How good is the God of Israel to the upright in heart!" But when the wicked see the judge, he will not seem good to them, because they will not rejoice in heart toward him, but then "all the tribes of the earth will mourn," that is, in the number of all the wicked and unbelieving. For this reason too, to the man who had called him "good teacher" and asked his advice on gaining eternal life, he answered: "Why do you ask me about the good? No one is good but God alone"; although in another place the Lord himself calls a man good: "A good man," he says, "brings forth good things out of the good treasure of his heart, and an evil man brings forth evil things out of the evil treasure of his heart." But because that man was seeking eternal life, and eternal life is in that contemplation in which God is seen not to punishment but to everlasting joy, and he did not understand with whom he was speaking, thinking him only a son of man, he says, "Why do you ask me about the good?" that is: "Why do you ask this form that you see about the good, and call me, according to what you see, good teacher? This is the form of the Son of Man; this form was taken; this form will appear in the judgment, not only to the righteous but also to the ungodly; and the sight of this form will not be for the good of those who do evil. But there is a sight of my form in which, when I was in it, I did not think it robbery to be equal to God, but emptied myself in order to take this one." That one God, then, the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, who will not appear except to the joy that will not be taken from the righteous, for which future joy he sighs who says, "One thing I have asked of the Lord, this will I seek: that I may dwell in the house of the Lord all the days of my life, that I may contemplate the delight of the Lord"; that one God, then, alone is good, for this reason, that no one sees him to grief and lamentation, but only to salvation and true joy. "If you understand me according to that form, I am good; but if only according to this one, why do you ask me about the good?" if you are among those who "will look on him whom they pierced"; and that very sight will be an evil to them, because it will be a punishment. That the Lord said "Why do you ask me about the good? No one is good but God alone" in this sense is probable from the proofs I have recalled: because that vision of God, in which we shall contemplate the unchangeable substance of God, invisible to human eyes, which is promised to the saints alone; which the apostle Paul calls "face to face"; of which the apostle John says, "We shall be like him, for we shall see him as he is"; of which it is said, "One thing I have asked of the Lord, that I may contemplate the delight of the Lord"; of which the Lord himself says, "And I will love him and will show myself to him"; for the sake of which alone we cleanse our hearts by faith, that we may be blessed, the pure in heart, for they shall see God; and whatever else has been said of that vision, which anyone who turns the eye of love to seeking it finds scattered most abundantly through all the Scriptures; that vision alone is our highest good, for the sake of attaining which we are commanded to do whatever we rightly do. But that sight of the Son of Man which has been foretold, when all nations will be gathered before him and will say to him, "Lord, when did we see you hungry and thirsty?" and the rest, will neither be a good to the ungodly, who will be sent into the eternal fire, nor will it be the highest good for the righteous. For he still calls them to the kingdom that has been prepared for them from the foundation of the world. For as he will say to the former, "Go into the eternal fire," so to the latter, "Come, blessed of my Father, take possession of the kingdom prepared for you." And as the former will go into eternal burning, so the righteous into eternal life. And what is eternal life but "that they may know you," he says, "the one true God, and Jesus Christ whom you have sent"? But by then in that brightness of which he says to the Father, "which I had with you before the world was." For then he will hand over the kingdom to God the Father, so that the good servant may enter into the joy of his Lord, and he will hide those whom God possesses in the hiding place of his face from the disturbance of men, that is, of those who will then be disturbed on hearing that sentence. The righteous man will not fear that evil hearing, if only he is protected in the tabernacle, that is, in the right faith of the catholic Church, from the contradiction of tongues, that is, from the false charges of heretics. But if there is another understanding of the Lord's words when he says, "Why do you ask me about the good? No one is good but God alone," provided only that it is not believed on that account that the substance of the Father is of greater goodness than that of the Son, according to which he is the Word through whom all things were made, and it in no way departs from sound doctrine, let us use it without anxiety, and not one only but as many as can be found. For the heretics are the more forcibly refuted the more ways out lie open for escaping their snares. But let us now seek what still remains to be considered from another beginning.

1 Cor 2:8 (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Cor 13:4 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 25:31 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 25:32 (quotation, high confidence) · Zech 12:10 (quotation, high confidence) · John 19:37 (quotation, medium confidence) · Matt 5:8 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 13:12 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:24 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:28 (allusion, high confidence) · John 14:21 (quotation, high confidence) · John 12:47 (quotation, high confidence) · John 8:50 (quotation, high confidence) · John 5:22 (quotation, high confidence) · John 5:26 (quotation, high confidence) · Phil 2:6 (allusion, high confidence) · Phil 2:7 (allusion, high confidence) · Phil 2:8 (quotation, high confidence) · Phil 2:9 (quotation, high confidence) · Phil 2:10 (quotation, high confidence) · Phil 2:11 (quotation, high confidence) · John 5:24 (quotation, high confidence) · John 5:25 (quotation, high confidence) · John 5:27 (quotation, high confidence) · John 5:28 (quotation, high confidence) · John 5:29 (quotation, high confidence) · John 17:3 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 73:1 (72:1 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 24:30 (quotation, high confidence) · Mark 10:18 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 19:17 (quotation, medium confidence) · Matt 12:35 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 27:4 (26:4 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · 1 John 3:2 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 25:37 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 25:41 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 25:34 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 25:46 (allusion, high confidence) · John 17:5 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 25:21 (allusion, high confidence) · Ps 31:20 (30:21 Vulg.) (allusion, high confidence) · Ps 112:7 (111:7 Vulg.) (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Augustine argues that at the judgment Christ will appear to good and wicked alike in the form of the Son of Man, while the vision of his divine form, the highest good and eternal life, is reserved for the pure in heart; this explains 'the Father judges no one' and 'no one is good but God alone.'

  • Quotations: 1 Cor 2:8; 2 Cor 13:4; Matt 25:31–32; Zech 12:10 (cf. John 19:37); Matt 5:8; 1 Cor 13:12; 1 Cor 15:24, 28; John 14:21; John 12:47; John 8:50; John 5:22; John 5:26; Phil 2:6–11; John 5:24–29; John 17:3; Ps 73:1 (Ps 72:1 Vulgate); Matt 24:30; Mark 10:18 (Luke 18:19); Matt 12:35; Ps 27:4 (Ps 26:4 Vulgate); 1 John 3:2; Matt 25:37, 41, 34, 46; John 17:5; Matt 25:21; Ps 31:20 (Ps 30:21 Vulgate); Ps 112:7 (Ps 111:7 Vulgate).
  • Zech 12:10 ('will look on him whom they pierced') is applied to those Jews who persevere in malice, as Augustine writes; translated as written.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (leaked paragraph number (29) of the print, misread by OCR): apparens, in qua Deus est æqualis Patri, sed in ea qua filius hominis est. iD. Itaque → apparens, in qua Deus est æqualis Patri, sed in ea qua filius hominis est. Itaque.

Topics: Christology, Eschatology, Trinity

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Trin. 1.13 (PL 42:839–845; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-trinitate/1-12/#p-1-13). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-trinitate-1-13) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text of the Open Greek and Latin project); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation in NPNF¹ 3 (1887).