On the Trinity 1.7–1.11

Latin text: Migne, PL 42 (Latin text: Migne, Patrologia Latina, digitized by Open Greek and Latin (patrologia_latina-dev, University of Leipzig), CC BY-SA 4.0).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0). Compare: Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, series 1, vol. 3 (1887).

Show

Chapter 1

1.7PL 42:827–829

His et talibus divinarum Scripturarum testi­ moniis, quibus, ut dixi, priores nostri copiosius usi, expugnaverunt hæreticorum tales calumnias vel er­ rorcs, insinuatur fidei nostræ unitas et æqualitas Trini atis. Sed quia multa ill sanctis Libris propter incarnationem Verbi Dei, quæ pro salute nostra rc­ paranda facta est, ut mcdiator Dci et, hominum esset homo Christus Jcsus (I Tim. II II 5), ita dicuntur, ut majorem Filio Patrem significent, vel ctiam apertis­ sime ostendant; erraverunt homines minus diligenter serutantes vel intuentes universam seriem Scriptura­ rum, et ca quæ de i Christo Jesu secundum hominem dicta sunt, ad ejus substantiam quæ ante iucnruntio­ nem sempiterna erat, et sempiterna est, transferre conati sunt. Et illi quidem dicunt minorem Filium esse quam Pater esl, quia scriptum est ipso Domino dicente, Pater major me est. Veritas autem ostendit secundum istum modum eliam se ipso minorem Fili'lIn. Quomodo enim non etiam se ipso minuor factus est. qui semetipsum exinanivit, for­ mam servi accipiens? Neque cnim sic accepit formam servi, ut amitteret formam Dei, in qua erat æqualis Patri. Si erogo iia accepta est forma servi, ut non amitteretur forma Dei, cum et in forma servi et in forma Dei idem ipse sit FiMus unigenitus nei Patris, in forma Dei aequalis Putri, in forma servi mediator Dei et hominum homo Christus Jesus; quis nou in­ telligat quod in forma Dei etiam ipse se ipso major est, in forma autem servi etiam se ipso minor est ' Non itaque immerito Scriptura utrumque dicit, et æqualem Patri Filium, et Patrem majorem Filio. Ulud enim propter formam Dei, hoc autem propter formam servi, sine ulla confusione intelligitur.Et hæc nobis regula per omnes sacras Scripturas dissolvendae hujus quæstionis, ex uno capitulo Epistolæ Pauli apostoli promitur, ubi manifestius ista distinctio com. mendatur. Ait enim: Qui cum in forma Dei esset, non rapinam arbitratus est esse æqualis Deo; sed semelipsum exinanivit, formam servi accipiens, in simililudi­ nem hominum factus, et habitu inventus ut homo (Phi­ lipp. II, 6, 7 ). Est ergo Dei Filius Deo Patri natura æqualis, habitu minor. In forma enim servi quam accepit, minor cst Patre: in forma autem Dei in qua erat etiam antequam hanc accepisset, a qualis est na­ tri. In forma Dei, Verbum per quod facta sunt omnia: in forma autcin servi, factus ex mulicre, factus sub Lege, ut eos qui sub LeGe crant, redime­ ret. Proinde in forma Dei fecit homi­ nem: in forma servi factus est homo. Nam si Pater tantum sine Filio fecisset hominem, non scriptum cs­ set, Faciamus hominem ad imaginem et similitudinem nostram. Ergo quia forma Dei accepit fotmam servi, utrumque Deus et utrumque homo: sed utrumque Deus propter accipientem Deum, utrumque autem homo propter acceptum hominem. Neque enim illa susceptione alterum corum in alterum conversum atque mutatum est: nec divinitas quippe in creaturam mutata est, ut desisteret esse divinitas; nec creatura in divinitatem, ut desisteret esse creatura.

By these and similar testimonies of the divine Scriptures, which, as I said, our predecessors used more abundantly in overcoming such false charges or errors of the heretics, the unity and equality of the Trinity is commended to our faith. But because many things in the holy books are said, on account of the incarnation of the Word of God, which took place for the restoring of our salvation so that the man Christ Jesus might be the mediator between God and men, in such a way as to signify that the Father is greater than the Son, or even to show it most plainly, men have gone astray, examining or looking at the whole course of the Scriptures with too little care, and they have tried to transfer what is said of Christ Jesus according to the man to his substance, which was everlasting before the incarnation and is everlasting. And they say that the Son is less than the Father because it is written that the Lord himself said, "The Father is greater than I." But the truth shows that in this way the Son is less even than himself. For how was he not made less even than himself, who emptied himself, taking the form of a servant? For he did not so take the form of a servant as to lose the form of God, in which he was equal to the Father. If, then, the form of a servant was so taken that the form of God was not lost, since in the form of a servant and in the form of God he is the same only-begotten Son of God the Father, in the form of God equal to the Father, in the form of a servant the mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus, who does not understand that in the form of God he is greater even than himself, and in the form of a servant less even than himself? Not without reason, therefore, does Scripture say both: that the Son is equal to the Father, and that the Father is greater than the Son. The former is understood on account of the form of God, the latter on account of the form of a servant, without any confusion. And this rule for resolving this question throughout all the holy Scriptures is drawn from one passage of the Epistle of the apostle Paul, where this distinction is commended more plainly. For he says: "Who, being in the form of God, did not think it robbery to be equal to God; but emptied himself, taking the form of a servant, made in the likeness of men, and found in fashion as a man." The Son of God, therefore, is equal to God the Father by nature, less by fashion. For in the form of a servant which he took he is less than the Father; but in the form of God, in which he was even before he took this one, he is equal to the Father. In the form of God he is the Word through whom all things were made; but in the form of a servant he was made of a woman, made under the Law, to redeem those who were under the Law. Accordingly, in the form of God he made man; in the form of a servant he was made man. For if the Father alone, without the Son, had made man, it would not have been written, "Let us make man in our image and likeness." Therefore, because the form of God took the form of a servant, each is God and each is man: but each is God on account of God who takes, and each is man on account of the man who is taken. For by that taking up neither of them was turned and changed into the other: neither was the divinity changed into the creature so as to cease to be divinity, nor the creature into the divinity so as to cease to be creature.

1 Tim 2:5 (quotation, high confidence) · John 14:28 (quotation, high confidence) · Phil 2:6 (quotation, high confidence) · Phil 2:7 (quotation, high confidence) · John 1:3 (allusion, high confidence) · Gal 4:4 (quotation, high confidence) · Gal 4:5 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 1:26 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Augustine gives his rule for reading Scripture about Christ: in the form of God the Son is equal to the Father, in the form of a servant he is less, as Philippians 2 teaches, without either nature being changed into the other.

  • Quotations: 1 Tim 2:5; John 14:28; Phil 2:6–7; John 1:3; Gal 4:4–5; Gen 1:26.
  • 'Each is God and each is man' (utrumque Deus et utrumque homo): Augustine's wording, meaning that the one who is both forms may be called God and may be called man, by reason of the God who takes and the man who is taken; translated literally.

Topics: Christology, Trinity

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Trin. 1.7 (PL 42:827–829; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-trinitate/1-7/#p-1-7). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-trinitate-1-7) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text of the Open Greek and Latin project); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation in NPNF¹ 3 (1887).

1.8PL 42:829–831

Illud au­ lem quod dicit Apostulus, Cum autem ei omnia subje­ cta fuerint, tunc et ipse Filius subjectus erit ei qui illi subjecit omnia; aut ideo dictum est, ne quisquam pu­ taret habitum Christi, qui ex humana creatura susce­ pius est, conversum iri postea in ipsam divinitatem, vel, ut curtius expresserim, deitatem, quæ non est. creatura, sed est unitas Trinitatis incorporea et incom­ mutabilis et sibimet consubstantialis et coæterna na­ tura. Aut si quisquam contendit, ut aliqui senserunt, ila dictum, Et ipse Filius subjectus erit ei qui illi sub­ jecit omnia, ut ipsam subjectionem, commutationem et conversionem credat futuram creaturæ in ipsam substantiam vel essentiam Creatoris, id est, ut quae fucrat substantia creaturæ, fiat substantia Creatoris; certe vel hoc concedit, quod non habet ullam dubita­ tionem, nondum hoc fuisse factum cum Dominus di­ ceret, Pater major me est. Dixit enim hoc non solum antequam ascendisset in ccelum, verum etiam an­ tequam passus resurrexisset a mortuis. Illi autem qui putant humanam in eo naturam in deitatis substantiam mutari atque converti, et ita dictum, Tunc et ipse Fi­ lius subjectus erit ei qui illi subjecit omnia, ac si dice­ retur, Tunc et ipse Filius hominis et a Verbo Dei, suscepta humana natura commutabitur in ejus natu­ ram, qui ei subjecit omnia; tunc futurum putant, cum post diem judicii tradiderit regnum Deo et Patri. Ac per hoc etiam secundum istam opinionem adhuc Pater major est, quam quæ de Virgine servi forma accepta est. Quod si aliqui et hoc affirmant, quod jam fuerit in Dei substantiam mutatus homo Christus Jesus; illud certe negare non possunt, quod adhuc natura hominis mancbat, quando ante passionem di­ cebat, Quoniam Pater major me est: unde nulla cuncta­ tio est secundum hoc dictum csse, quod forma servi major est Pater, cui in forma Dei aequalis est Filius. Nec quisquam cum audierit quod ait Apostolus, Cum autem dixerit, quia omnia subjecta sunt ei, manifestum quia præter eum qui illi subjecit omnia, ita existimet de Patre intelligendum, quod subjecerit omnia Filio, ut ipsum Filium sibi omnia subjecisse non putet. Quod Apostolus ad Philippenses ostendit dicens: Nostra autcm conversatio in cælis est unde el Salvatorem exspectamus Dominum Jcsum Chri­ stum, qui transfigurabit corpus humilitatis nostræ, COM­ forme u: fiat corpori gloriæ suæ, secundum operationem suam, qua possit etiam sibi subjicere omnia ( Philipp. III, 20, 21). Inseparabilis enin operatio est Patris ct Filii. Alioquin nec ipse Pater sibi subjecit omnia, sed. Filius ei subjecit, qui ei regnum tradit, et evacuat omnem principatum et omnem potestatem et virtu­ tem. De Filio quippe ista dicta sunt: Cum tradiderit, inquit, reguum Deo et Patri, cum evacuaverit omnem principatum et omnem potestatem et virtutem. Ipse enim subjicit, qui evacuat. Nee sic arbitremur Christum traditurum re­ gnum Deo et Patri, ut adimat sibi. Nam et boc quidam vaniloqui crediderunt. Cum enim dicitur, tradiderit regnum Deo et Patri, non separatur ipse; quia simul cum Patre unus Deus est. Sed divinarum Scripturarum incuriosos 1 et contentionum studiosos fallit verbum quod positum est, donec. Ita namque sequitur, Oportet enim illum regnare, donec ponat ont­ nes inimicos suos sub pedibus suis: tanquam cum posuerit, non sit regnaturus. Nec intel­ ligunt ita dictum, sicuti est illud: Confirmatum est cor ejus; non commovebitur, donec videat super inimicos suos. Non enim cum viderit, jam cum­ movebitur. Quid ergo est, Cum tradiderit regnum Deo et Palri? quasi modo non habeat regnum Deus et Pa­ ter? Sed quia omnes justos, in quibus nunc regnat ex fuie viventibus mediator Dei et homimum homo ChisUis Jesus, perducturus est ad speciem, quam visionem dicit idem apostolus, Facie ad faciem (1 Cor. xm, 12); ita dictum est, Cum tradiderit regnum Deo et Patri, ac si diceretur, Cum perduxerit credentes. ad contemplationem Dei et Patris. Sic cnm dicit: Omnia mihi tradita sunt a Patre meo: ct nemo novit Fitium, nisi Pater; et nemo novit Patrem, nisi Filius, ei cui voluerit Filius revelare ( Matth. xi, 27 ). Tunc revelabitur a Filio Pater, cum evacuaverit omnem prin­ cipatum et omnem potestatem et virtutem; id est, ut necessaria non sit dispensatio similitudinum per an­ gelicos principatus et potestates et virtutes. Ex qua­ rum persona non inconvenienter intelligitur dici in Cantico canticorum ad sponsam, Similitudines auri faciemus tibi cum distinctionibus argenti, quoadusque rex in recubitu suo eat (Cant. I, ii, sec. LXX), id est, quoadusque Christus in secreto suo est; quia vita re­ stra abscondita eat cum Christo in Deo: cum Christus 1 apparuerit vita vestra, tunc et vos cum ipso apparebitis in gloria. Quod antequam fiat, vide­ mus nunc per speculum in ænigmate, hoc est in simili­ tndiuibus; tunc autem, facie ad faciem. Haec enim nobis contemplatio promittitur actio­ num omnium finis atque æterna perfectio gaudiorum. Filii enim Dei sumus, et nondum apparuit quid erimus: scimus quia cum apparuerit, similes ei erimus, quoniam videbimus eum sicuti eat. Quod enim dixit famulo suo Moysi, Ego sum qui sum. Hæc dices filiis Is­ rael: Qu: est, misit me ad vos ( Exod. III, 14); hoc contem­ plabimur cum vivemus in æternum. Ita quippe ait: Hæc autem eat vita æterna, ut cognoscant te unum verum Deum; et quem misisti Jesum Christum ( Joan. XVII, 3 ). Hoc fiet cum venerit Dominus, et illumina­ verit occulta tenebrarum ( I Cor. IV, 5 ), cum tene. bne mortalitatis hujus corruptionisque transierint. Tunc erit mane nostrum, de quo in Psalmo dicitur: Mane astabo tibi, et contemplabor ( Psal. v, 5). De hac contemplatione intelligo dictum, Cum tradi­ derit regnum Deo et Patri: id cst, cum perduxerit justos, in quibus nunc ex fide viventibus regnat me­ diator Dei et hominum homo Christus Jesus, ad contemplationem Dei et Patris. Si desipio hic, corrigat me qui melius sapit: mihi aliud non vi­ detur. Neque enim quæremus aliud, cum ad illius contemplationem pervenerimus, quæ nunc non est, quamdiu gaudium nostrum in spe est. Spes autem quæ videtur, non eat spes: quod enim videt quis, quid sperat? Si autem quod non videmus speramus, per patientiam exspectamus, quoad­ usque rex in recubitu suo est. Tunc erit quod scri­ ptum est: Adimplebis me lætitia cum vultu tuo ( Psal. xv, ii ). Illa lætitia nihil amplius requiretur; quia nec erit quod amplius requiratur. Ostendetur enim nobis Patcr, et sufficiet nobis. Quod bene intellexerat Philippus, ut diceret Domino, Ostende nobis Patrem, et sufficit nobis: sed nondum intellexerat, eo quoque nodo idipsum se potuisse dicere, Domine, ostende nobis te, et sufficit nobis. Ut enim hoc intelligeret, responsum ei a Domino est, Tanto tempore vobiscum sum, et non cognovistis me? Philippe, qui vidit me, vidit et Patrem. Sed quia volebat eum ex fide vivere antequam illud posset videre, secutus est, et ait: Non credis quia ego in Patre, et Pater in me eat ( Joan. xiv, 8, 10)? Quamdiu enim sumus in corpore, peregrinamur a Domino. Ptr fidem enim ambulamus, non per speciem. Contemplatio quippe merces est fidei, cui mercedi per fidem corda mundantur; sicut scriptum est, Mundans fide corda eorum ( Act. xv, 9 ). Probatur autem quod illi con­ templationi corda mundentur, illa maxime sententia: Beati mundicordes, quoniam ipsi Deum videbunt ( Matth. v, 8 ). Et quia hæc est vita æterna, dicit Deus in Psalmo: Longitudine dierum replebo eam, et ostendam illi salutare meum ( Psal. xc, 16). Sive ergo audiamus, Ostende nobis Filium; sive audia­ mus, Ostende nobis Patrem: tantumdem valet; quia neuter sine altero potest ostendi. Unum quippe sunt, sicut et ipse ait: Ego et Pater unum sumus ( Joan. x, 30). Denique propter ipsam inseparabilitatem, sufficienter aliquando nominatur, vel Pater solus, vel Filius solus adimpleturus nos lætitia cum vultu suo. Nec inde separatur utriusque Spiritus, id est Patris et Filii Spiritus. Qui Spiritus sanctus proprie dicitur Spiritus veritatis, quem hic mundus accipere non potest ( Id. xiv, 17 ). Hoc est enim plenum gau­ dium nostrum, quo amplius non cst, frui Trinitate Deo ad cujus imaginem facti sumus. Propter hoc aliquando ita loquitur de Spiritu sancto tanquam solus ipse sufficiat ad beatitudinem nostram: et ideo solus sufficit, quia separari a Patre et Filio non pntest; sicut Pater solus sufficit, quia separari a Filio et Spi­ ritu sancto non potest; et Filius idco sufficit solus, quia separari a Patre et Spiritu sancto non potest. Quid enim sibi vult quod ait, Si diligitis me, man­ data mea servate; et ego rogabo Patrem, et alium ad­ vocatum dabit vobis, ut vobiscum sit in æternum, Spiritum veritatis, quem hic mundus accipere non po­ test (lbid. 5 15-17), id est, dilectores mundi? Animalis enitn homo non percipit ea quæ sunt Spiritus Dei ( I Cor. II, 14). Sed adhuc potest videri ideo di­ ctum, Et ego rogabo Patrem, et alium advocatum dabit vobis, quasi non solus Filius sufficiat. Illo autem loco ita de illo dictum est tanquam solus omnino suf. ficiat: Cum venerit ille Spiritus veritatis, docebit vos omnem veritatem ( Joan. VI, 13 ). Numquid ergo se­ paratur hinc Filius, tanquam ipse non doceat omnem veritatem, aut quasi hoc impleat Spiritus sanctus quod minus potuit docere Filius? Dicant ergo, si placet, majoreln esse Filio Spiritum sanctum, quem minorem illo solent dicere. An quia non dictum cst, Ipse solus; aut, Nemo, nisi ipse, vos docebit omnem veritatem; ideo permittunt ut cum illo docere cre­ datur et Filius? Apostolus ergo Filium separavit ab sciendis iis quæ Dei sunt, ubi ait, Sic et quæ Dei sunt, nemo scit, nisi Spiritus Dei ( I Cor. II, it ): ut jam isti perversi possint ex hoc dicere, quod et Filium non doceat quae Dei sunt nisi Spiritus san. ctus, tanquam major minorem; cui Filius ipse tan­ tum tribuit, ut diceret, Quia hcec locutus sum tobis, tristitia implevit cor vestrum. Sed ego veritatem dico: expedit vobis ut ego cam; nam si non abiero, advo­ catus non veniet ad vos.

As for what the Apostle says, "But when all things have been subjected to him, then the Son himself will also be subjected to him who subjected all things to him": either it was said so that no one might think that the human fashion of Christ, which was taken from the human creature, would afterward be changed into the divinity itself, or, to put it more precisely, into the deity, which is not a creature but is the unity of the Trinity, an incorporeal, unchangeable nature, consubstantial and coeternal with itself. Or if anyone contends, as some have held, that "the Son himself will also be subjected to him who subjected all things to him" was said in such a way that he believes this subjection to be a future change and conversion of the creature into the very substance or essence of the Creator, that is, that what had been the substance of a creature will become the substance of the Creator, he certainly grants at least this, about which there is no doubt: that this had not yet happened when the Lord said, "The Father is greater than I." For he said this not only before he ascended into heaven but even before he suffered and rose from the dead. And those who think that the human nature in him is to be changed and converted into the substance of the deity, and that "then the Son himself will also be subjected to him who subjected all things to him" was said as if it were said, "then the Son of Man himself, and the human nature taken by the Word of God, will be changed into the nature of him who subjected all things to him," think that this will happen when, after the day of judgment, he hands over the kingdom to God the Father. And therefore even according to that opinion the Father is still greater than the form of a servant which was taken from the Virgin. And if some affirm even this, that the man Christ Jesus has already been changed into the substance of God, they certainly cannot deny that the nature of man still remained when, before his passion, he said, "For the Father is greater than I." Hence there is no hesitation that this was said in the sense that the Father is greater than the form of a servant, though in the form of God the Son is equal to him. Nor, when he hears what the Apostle says, "But when he says that all things have been subjected to him, it is plain that he is excepted who subjected all things to him," let anyone think that it is to be understood of the Father in such a way that he subjected all things to the Son so that the Son did not himself subject all things to himself. The Apostle shows this to the Philippians when he says: "But our citizenship is in heaven, from which we also await a Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ, who will transform the body of our lowliness to be conformed to the body of his glory, according to his working, by which he is able even to subject all things to himself." For the working of the Father and the Son is inseparable. Otherwise neither did the Father himself subject all things to himself, but the Son subjected them to him, who hands over the kingdom to him and abolishes every principality and every authority and power. For these things are said of the Son: "When he hands over," he says, "the kingdom to God the Father, when he has abolished every principality and every authority and power." For he who abolishes is the one who subjects. Nor let us suppose that Christ will hand over the kingdom to God the Father in such a way as to take it away from himself. For some empty talkers have believed even this. For when it is said, "he hands over the kingdom to God the Father," he himself is not separated, since together with the Father he is one God. But those who are careless about the divine Scriptures and eager for disputes are misled by the word that is used, "until." For it continues thus: "For he must reign until he has put all his enemies under his feet," as if, when he has put them there, he will not reign. Nor do they understand that this is said in the same way as this: "His heart is established; he will not be moved until he sees his desire upon his enemies." For when he has seen it, he will not then be moved. What, then, is "when he hands over the kingdom to God the Father"? As though God the Father did not have the kingdom now? But because the mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus, is going to bring all the righteous, in whom he now reigns as they live by faith, to sight, which the same apostle calls the vision "face to face," it is said, "when he hands over the kingdom to God the Father," as if it were said, "when he has brought those who believe to the contemplation of God the Father." So when he says, "All things have been handed over to me by my Father; and no one knows the Son except the Father, and no one knows the Father except the Son and anyone to whom the Son chooses to reveal him," the Father will then be revealed by the Son when he has abolished every principality and every authority and power; that is, so that the dispensation of likenesses through angelic principalities and authorities and powers will no longer be necessary. Speaking in their person, not unfittingly, it is understood to be said to the bride in the Song of Songs, "We will make you likenesses of gold with studs of silver, while the king is on his couch"; that is, while Christ is in his hidden place, because "your life is hidden with Christ in God; when Christ, your life, appears, then you too will appear with him in glory." Before this happens, "we see now through a mirror in a riddle," that is, in likenesses, "but then face to face." For this contemplation is promised to us as the end of all actions and the eternal fulfillment of joys. For "we are children of God, and it has not yet appeared what we shall be; we know that when he appears we shall be like him, for we shall see him as he is." For what he said to his servant Moses, "I am who I am. This you shall say to the children of Israel: He who is has sent me to you," this we shall contemplate when we live forever. For so he says: "And this is eternal life, that they may know you, the one true God, and Jesus Christ whom you have sent." This will happen when the Lord has come and has brought to light the hidden things of darkness, when the darkness of this mortality and corruption has passed away. Then will be our morning, of which it is said in the Psalm, "In the morning I will stand before you and will contemplate." Of this contemplation I understand it to be said, "when he hands over the kingdom to God the Father"; that is, when the mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus, has brought the righteous, in whom he now reigns as they live by faith, to the contemplation of God the Father. If I am foolish here, let someone wiser correct me; to me it seems nothing else. For we shall seek nothing else when we have come to the contemplation of him, which is not ours now, so long as our joy is in hope. "But hope that is seen is not hope; for who hopes for what he sees? But if we hope for what we do not see, we wait for it with patience," while the king is on his couch. Then will come what is written: "You will fill me with joy with your countenance." Nothing further will be sought beyond that joy, because there will be nothing further to seek. For the Father will be shown to us, and it will be enough for us. Philip had understood this well, so that he said to the Lord, "Show us the Father, and it is enough for us"; but he had not yet understood that he could have said the same thing in this way too: "Lord, show us yourself, and it is enough for us." For in order that he might understand this, the Lord answered him, "Have I been with you so long, and you have not known me? Philip, he who has seen me has seen the Father too." But because he wished him to live by faith before he could see that, he went on to say, "Do you not believe that I am in the Father and the Father is in me?" For "as long as we are in the body we are away from the Lord; for we walk by faith, not by sight." For contemplation is the reward of faith, and for that reward hearts are cleansed by faith, as it is written, "cleansing their hearts by faith." And that hearts are cleansed for that contemplation is proved above all by that saying, "Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God." And because this is eternal life, God says in the Psalm, "With length of days I will fill him, and I will show him my salvation." Whether, then, we hear "Show us the Son" or hear "Show us the Father," it amounts to the same, because neither can be shown without the other. For they are one, as he himself says: "I and the Father are one." Finally, because of this very inseparability, it is sometimes enough to name either the Father alone or the Son alone as the one who will fill us with joy with his countenance. Nor is the Spirit of both, that is, the Spirit of the Father and of the Son, separated from this. This Holy Spirit is properly called "the Spirit of truth, whom this world cannot receive." For this is our full joy, beyond which there is none: to enjoy God the Trinity, in whose image we were made. For this reason Scripture sometimes speaks of the Holy Spirit as if he alone were sufficient for our blessedness; and he alone is sufficient for this reason, that he cannot be separated from the Father and the Son; just as the Father alone is sufficient because he cannot be separated from the Son and the Holy Spirit, and the Son alone is sufficient for this reason, that he cannot be separated from the Father and the Holy Spirit. For what does he mean when he says, "If you love me, keep my commandments; and I will ask the Father, and he will give you another Advocate, to be with you forever, the Spirit of truth, whom this world cannot receive," that is, the lovers of the world? For "the soulish man does not perceive the things of the Spirit of God." But it may still seem that "And I will ask the Father, and he will give you another Advocate" was said as though the Son alone were not sufficient. But in that other place it is said of the Spirit as if he alone were wholly sufficient: "When that Spirit of truth comes, he will teach you all truth." Is the Son, then, separated from this, as though he himself did not teach all truth, or as though the Holy Spirit fulfilled what the Son was less able to teach? Let them say, then, if they please, that the Holy Spirit is greater than the Son, whom they usually call less than he. Or, because it is not said, "He alone," or "No one but he will teach you all truth," do they therefore allow the Son to be believed to teach together with him? Then the Apostle has separated the Son from knowing the things that are God's, where he says, "So also no one knows the things of God except the Spirit of God," so that these perverse people could now say on this basis that no one teaches even the Son the things of God except the Holy Spirit, as the greater teaches the lesser; to whom the Son himself attributes so much as to say, "Because I have said these things to you, sorrow has filled your heart. But I tell you the truth: it is to your advantage that I go away; for if I do not go away, the Advocate will not come to you."

1 Cor 15:28 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:27 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:24 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:25 (quotation, high confidence) · John 14:28 (quotation, high confidence) · Phil 3:20 (quotation, high confidence) · Phil 3:21 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 112:8 (111:8 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 13:12 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 11:27 (quotation, high confidence) · Song 1:11 (quotation, high confidence) · Col 3:3 (quotation, high confidence) · Col 3:4 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 John 3:2 (quotation, high confidence) · Exod 3:14 (quotation, high confidence) · John 17:3 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 4:5 (allusion, high confidence) · Ps 5:3 (5:5 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 8:24 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 8:25 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 16:11 (15:11 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · John 14:8 (quotation, high confidence) · John 14:9 (quotation, high confidence) · John 14:10 (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Cor 5:6 (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Cor 5:7 (quotation, high confidence) · Acts 15:9 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 5:8 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 91:16 (90:16 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · John 10:30 (quotation, high confidence) · John 14:15 (quotation, high confidence) · John 14:16 (quotation, high confidence) · John 14:17 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 2:14 (quotation, high confidence) · John 16:13 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 2:11 (quotation, high confidence) · John 16:6 (quotation, high confidence) · John 16:7 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Augustine explains that the Son's being 'subjected' to the Father and 'handing over the kingdom' (1 Cor 15) mean that Christ will bring believers to the contemplation of God, in which Father, Son and Spirit are seen together, since none of them can be shown or enjoyed apart from the others.

  • Quotations: 1 Cor 15:28, 27, 24–25; John 14:28; Phil 3:20–21; Ps 112:8 (Ps 111:8 Vulgate); 1 Cor 13:12; Matt 11:27; Song 1:11 (Old Latin from the LXX, as the edition notes); Col 3:3–4; 1 John 3:2; Exod 3:14; John 17:3; 1 Cor 4:5; Ps 5:3 (Ps 5:5 Vulgate); Rom 8:24–25; Ps 16:11 (Ps 15:11 Vulgate); John 14:8–10; 2 Cor 5:6–7; Acts 15:9; Matt 5:8; Ps 91:16 (Ps 90:16 Vulgate); John 10:30; John 14:15–17; 1 Cor 2:14; John 16:13; 1 Cor 2:11; John 16:6–7.
  • 'Until' (donec): Augustine argues from Ps 112:8 that 'until' does not imply that the state ends afterward.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (leaked paragraph number (17) of the print; leaked paragraph number (18) of the print, misread by OCR): faciem. r 17. Haec → faciem. Haec; vultu suo. iS. Nec → vultu suo. Nec.

Topics: Trinity, Christology, Eschatology

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Trin. 1.8 (PL 42:829–831; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-trinitate/1-7/#p-1-8). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-trinitate-1-8) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text of the Open Greek and Latin project); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation in NPNF¹ 3 (1887).

1.9PL 42:833

Hoc autem dixit, non propter in­ æqualitatem Verbi Dei et Spiritus sancti, sed tanquam impedimento esset præsentia Filii hominis apud eos, quominus veniret ille qui minor non esset, quia se­ metipsum non exinanivit, formam servi accipiens, sicut Filius (Philipp. -lit 7). Oportebat ergo ut au­ ferretur ab oculis eorum forma servi, quam in­ tuentes, hoc solum esse Christum putabant quod videbant. Inde est et illud quod ait, Si diligeretis me, gauderetis utique, quoniam eo ad Putrem; quia Pater major me eat: id est, propterca me oportet ire ad Patrem, quia dum me ita vidctis, ex hoc quod videtis, ocstimatis quia minor sum Pa­ tre, atque ita circa creaturam susceptumque habi. tum occupati, aequalitatem quam cum Patre habeo non mtelligitis. Inde est et illud: Noli me tangere; nondum enim ascendi ad Patrem. Tactus euim tanquam finem facit notionis. Ideoque nolebat in eo esse finem intenti cordis in se, ut hoc quod vi­ debatur tantummodo putaretur. Ascensio autem ad Patrem erat ita videri, sicut æqualis est Patri, ut ibi esset finis visionis, quoe sufficit nobis. Aliquando item de Filio solo dicitur, quod ipse sufficiat, et in ejus visione merces tota promittitur dilectionis I et desiderii nostri. Sic enim ait: Qui habet mandata mea et custodit ea, ille eat qui diligit me. Qui autem me diligit, diligetur a Patre meo; et ego diligam eum, et ostendam me ipsum illi. Numquid hic, quia non dixit, Ostendam illi et Patrem, ideo separavit Patrem? Sed quia verum est, Ego et Pater unum sumus; cum Paw ter ostenditur, et Filius ostenditur qui in illo est; et cum Filius ostenditur, etiam Pater ostenditur qui in illo est. Sicut ergo cum ait, Et ostendam me ipsum illi, intelligitur quia ostendit et Patrem; ita et in eo quod dicitur, Cum tradiderit regnum Deo et Patri, in­ telligiiur quia non adimit sibi. Quoniam cum perdu­ cet credentes ad contemplationem Dei et Patns, pro­ fecto perducet ad contemplationemsuam, qui dixit, Et ostendam illi me ipsum. Et ideo consequenter, cum dixisset illi Judas, Domine, quid factum est, quia osten­ surus es te nobis, et non huic mundo? respondit Jesus, et dixit illi: Si quis diligit me, sermonem meum aer­ vabit; et Pater meus diliget illum, et ad eum veniemus, et mansionem apud eum faciemus. Ecce quia non solum se ipsum ostendit ei a quo diligitur, quia simul cum Patre venit ad eum, et mansionem facit apud eum. An forte putabitur mansionem in dilectore suo facientibus Patre et Filio exclusus esse ab hac man­ sione Spiritus sanctus? Quid est ergo quod superius ait de Spiritu sancto: Quem hicmundu, accipere non potest, quoniam non videt iUum: nostis illum vos, quia vo­ biscum manet, et in tobis eat? Non itaque ab hac mansione separatus est, de quo dictum est, vobiscum manet, et in vobis eat. Nisi forte quisquam sic absurdus est, ut arbitretur, cum Pater et Filius venerint ut mansionem apud dilectorem suum faciant, discessu­ rum inde Spiritum sanctum, et tanquam locum daturum esse majoribus. Sed huic carnali cogitationi occur­ rit Scriptura: paulo quippe superius ait, Et ego rogaoo Patrem, et alium advocatum dabit vobis ut, vobiscum sit in æternum.Non ergo discedet Patre et Filio venientibus, sed in eadem mansione cum ipsis erit in aeternum; quia nec ille sine ipsis venit, nec illi sine ipso. Sed propter insinuationem Trinitatis, personis etiam singulis nominatis dicuntur quædam separa­ tim 1; non tamen aliis separatis intelliguntur, propter ejusdem Trinitatis unitatem unamqne substantiam atque deitatem Patris et Filii et Spiritus sancti.

But he said this not because of any inequality between the Word of God and the Holy Spirit, but as though the presence of the Son of Man with them would be a hindrance to the coming of him who was not less, because he did not empty himself, taking the form of a servant, as the Son did. It was necessary, therefore, that the form of a servant should be taken away from their eyes, since, looking at it, they thought that Christ was only what they saw. Hence also what he says: "If you loved me, you would surely rejoice that I am going to the Father, because the Father is greater than I"; that is, "It is necessary for me to go to the Father for this reason, that while you see me thus, you judge from what you see that I am less than the Father, and so, occupied with the creature and the fashion I have taken, you do not understand the equality I have with the Father." Hence also this: "Do not touch me; for I have not yet ascended to the Father." For touch makes, as it were, an end of knowing. And therefore he did not want the heart's attention to him to end in him in such a way that only what was seen should be thought to be he. But the ascension to the Father was to be seen as he is equal to the Father, so that there might be the end of the vision which is enough for us. Sometimes again it is said of the Son alone that he is sufficient, and the whole reward of our love and desire is promised in the vision of him. For so he says: "He who has my commandments and keeps them, he it is who loves me. And he who loves me will be loved by my Father; and I will love him and will show myself to him." Here, because he did not say, "I will show him the Father too," did he therefore separate the Father? But because it is true that "I and the Father are one," when the Father is shown, the Son, who is in him, is shown too; and when the Son is shown, the Father, who is in him, is shown too. Therefore, just as when he says, "And I will show myself to him," it is understood that he shows the Father too, so also in what is said, "when he hands over the kingdom to God the Father," it is understood that he does not take it away from himself. For when he brings believers to the contemplation of God the Father, he will surely bring them to the contemplation of himself, he who said, "And I will show myself to him." And so, consistently, when Judas said to him, "Lord, how is it that you are going to show yourself to us and not to this world?" Jesus answered and said to him: "If anyone loves me, he will keep my word; and my Father will love him, and we will come to him and make our dwelling with him." See how he not only shows himself to the one by whom he is loved, since he comes to him together with the Father and makes his dwelling with him. Or will it perhaps be thought that, when the Father and the Son make their dwelling in the one who loves them, the Holy Spirit is shut out from this dwelling? What, then, is it that he says above about the Holy Spirit: "whom this world cannot receive, because it does not see him; you know him, because he remains with you and is in you"? He is not, then, separated from this dwelling, of whom it is said, "he remains with you and is in you." Unless perhaps someone is so absurd as to suppose that when the Father and the Son come to make their dwelling with the one who loves them, the Holy Spirit will depart from there and, as it were, make room for greater ones. But Scripture meets this carnal thought; for a little earlier he says, "And I will ask the Father, and he will give you another Advocate, to be with you forever." He will not, then, depart when the Father and the Son come, but will be in the same dwelling with them forever; for neither does he come without them, nor they without him. But for the sake of making the Trinity known, some things are said separately, with each person named on his own; yet they are not understood with the others separated from them, because of the unity of the same Trinity and the one substance and deity of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit.

Phil 2:7 (allusion, high confidence) · John 14:28 (quotation, high confidence) · John 20:17 (quotation, high confidence) · John 14:21 (quotation, high confidence) · John 10:30 (quotation, high confidence) · John 14:22 (quotation, high confidence) · John 14:23 (quotation, high confidence) · John 14:17 (quotation, high confidence) · John 14:16 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Augustine explains that Christ's going away was needed so that the disciples would stop seeing only his servant form, and that whenever one person of the Trinity is said to be shown or to dwell in believers, the others are included.

  • Quotations: Phil 2:7; John 14:28; John 20:17; John 14:21; John 10:30; John 14:22–23; John 14:17; John 14:16.

Topics: Trinity, Christology

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Trin. 1.9 (PL 42:833; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-trinitate/1-7/#p-1-9). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-trinitate-1-9) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text of the Open Greek and Latin project); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation in NPNF¹ 3 (1887).

1.10PL 42:833–835

Tradet itaque regnum Dco et Patri Dominus noster Jcsus Christos, non se inde separato, nec Spiritu sancto, quando perducet cre­ dentes ad contemplationem Dei, ubi est finis omnium bonarum actionum, et requies sempiterna, et gau­ dium quod nunquam auferetur a nobis. Hoc enim si­ gnat in eo quod ait: Iterum videbo vos, et gaudebit cor vestrum, et gaudium vestrum nemo auferet a vobis. Hujus gaudii similitudinem præsignabal Maria sedens ad pedes Domini, et intenta in verbum ejus; quieta scilicet ab omni actione, et intenta in veritatem secundum quemdam modum, cujus capax est ista vita, quo tamen præfigurarct illud quod funi. rum est in aeternum. Martha quippc sorore sua in ne­ cessitatis actione conversante, quamvis bona et utili, tamen, ctun requies successerit, transitura, ipsa re­ quiescebat in verbo Domini. £t ideo Dominus con­ querenti Marthae quod eam soror non adjuvaret, respondit: Maria optimam partem elegit, quæ non au­ feretur ab ea ( Luc. x, 39-42 ). Non partem malam dixit quod agebat Martha; sed istam optimam quæ non auferetur. IlIa enim quae in ministerio indigentiae est, cum indigentia ipsa transierit, auferetur. Boni quippe operis transituri merces est requies perman­ sura. In illa igitur contemplatione Deus erit omnia in omnibus; quia nibil ab illo aliud requiretur, sed solo ipso illustrari perfruique sufficiet. Ideoque ille in quo Spiritus interpellat gemitibus inenarrahilibus, Unam, inquit, petii a Domino, hanc requiram; ut inhabitem in domo Domini per omnes dies vitæ meæ, ut contempler delectationem Domini. Contemplabimur enim Deum Patrem et Filium et Spiritum sanctum, cum mediator Dei et hominum homo Christus Jesus tradidcrit regnum Den et Patri, ut jam non interpellet pro nobis mediator et sacerdos noster, Filius Dei et Filius hominis; sed et ipse in quantum sacerdos est assumpta propter noa servi forma, subjectus sit ei qui illi subjecit omnia, et cui subjecit omnia; ut in quantum Deus est, cum illo nos subjectos habeat, in quantum sacerdos, no­ biscum illi subjectus sit ( I Cor. xv, 24-28). Quapro­ pter cum Filius sit et Deus et homo, alia substantia homo potius in Filio * quam Filius in Patre: sicut caro animæ meæ, alia substantia est ad animam meam, quamvis in uno homine, quam anima alterius hominis ad animam meam. Cum ergo tradiderit regnum Deo et Patri, id est, cum credentes ct viventes ex fide, pro quibus nunc mediator interpellat, perduxerit ad contempla. tionem, cui percipiendæ suspiramus et gemimus, et cum transierit labor et gemitus, jam non interpella­ bit pro nobis traditu regno Deo et Patri. lloc signifi­ cans nil, Hæc vobiscum locutus sum 1 in similitudini­ bus: veniet hora, quando jam MOM in similitudinibus loquar vobis, sed manifeste de Patre nuntiabo vobis; id est, jan non erunt similitudines, cum visio fucrit facie ad faciem. Hoc est enim quod ait, sed manifeste de Patre nuntiabo vobis; ac si diceret, manifeste Pa­ trem ostendam vobis. Nuntiabo quippc ait, quia Vcr­ bum ejus est. Scquitur cnim et dicit: Illa die in nomine meo petetis, et non dico vobis quia ego rogabo Patrem: ipse enim Pater amat vos, quia vos me ama­ stis, et credidistis qnia a Deo exivi. Exivi a Patre, et veni in hunc mundum: iterum relinquo mundum, et vado ad Patrem. Quid est, A Patre exivi; nisi, non in ea forma qua aequalis sum Patri, sed alilcr, id est, in assumpta creatura minor appa­ rui? Et quid est, Verri in hunc mundum; nisi, furrnam servi, quam me exinaniens accepi, etiam peccatorum qni mundum istum diligunt, oculis dcmonstravi? Et quid est, Iterum relinquo mundum; nisi, ab aspectu dilectorum mundi aufcro quod viderunt? Et quid est, Vado ad Patrem; nisi, doceo me sic intelligendum a fidelibus meis, quomodo æqualis sum Patri? Hoc qui credunt, digni habebuntur perduci a fide ad speciem, id est ad ipsam visionem, quo perducens dictus est traderc regnum Deo et Patri. Fideles quippe ejus quos redemit sanguine suo, dicti sunt regnum cjus, pro quibus nunc interpellat: tunc autem illic eos sibi fa­ ciens inhærere, ubi aequalis est Patri, non jam roga. bit Patrem pro eis. Ipse enim, inquit, Puter amat vos. Ex hoc enim rogat, quo minor est Patre: quo vero æqualis est, exaudit cum Patre. Unde se ab eo quod dixit, Ipse enim Pater amat vos, utique ipse non sepa­ rat; sed secundum ea facit intelligi quae supra com­ memoravi, satisque insinuavi, plerumque ita nominari unamquamque in Trinitate personam, ut et aliæ illic intelligantur. Sic itaque dictum est, Ipse enim Pater amat vos, ut consequenter intelligatur et Filius et Spi­ ritus sanctus: non quia modo nos non amat, qui proprio Filio non pepercit, sed pro nobis omnibus tradidit eum; sed tales nc s amat Deus, quales futuri sumus, non quales sumus. Quales enim amat, tales in æternum conservat: quod tunc erit, cum tradiderit regnum Deo et Patri, qui nunc interpel­ lat pro nobis, ut jam non roget Patrem, quia ipse Pater uniat nos. Quo autem merito, nisi fidei, qua credimus antequam illud quod promittitur videamus? Per hanc enim perveniemus ad speciem, ut tales amet, quales amat ut simus; non quales odit quia sumus 1, et hortatur ac præstat ne tales esse semper velimus.

So our Lord Jesus Christ will hand over the kingdom to God the Father, without separating himself or the Holy Spirit from it, when he brings believers to the contemplation of God, where is the end of all good actions, everlasting rest, and joy that will never be taken from us. For he signifies this when he says: "I will see you again, and your heart will rejoice, and no one will take your joy from you." Mary, sitting at the Lord's feet and intent on his word, foreshadowed a likeness of this joy: at rest, that is, from all action and intent on the truth in a certain way of which this life is capable, by which, however, she prefigured what is to be forever. For while her sister Martha was busy with the action of necessity, which, though good and useful, is yet to pass away when rest has succeeded it, she herself was resting in the word of the Lord. And so, when Martha complained that her sister was not helping her, the Lord answered: "Mary has chosen the best part, which will not be taken away from her." He did not call what Martha was doing a bad part; but he called this one the best, which will not be taken away. For the part that consists in ministering to need will be taken away when need itself has passed. For the reward of a good work that will pass away is a rest that will remain. In that contemplation, therefore, God will be all in all, because nothing other than he will be sought from him, but it will be enough to be enlightened by him alone and to enjoy him fully. And so he in whom the Spirit intercedes with groanings that cannot be uttered says, "One thing I have asked of the Lord, this will I seek: that I may dwell in the house of the Lord all the days of my life, that I may contemplate the delight of the Lord." For we shall contemplate God, the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, when the mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus, has handed over the kingdom to God the Father, so that our mediator and priest, the Son of God and Son of Man, no longer intercedes for us; but he himself also, insofar as he is a priest, having taken the form of a servant for our sake, is subjected to him who subjected all things to him and to whom he subjected all things; so that insofar as he is God he has us subjected together with him, and insofar as he is priest he is subjected to him together with us. Therefore, since the Son is both God and man, the man is rather another substance in the Son than the Son is in the Father; just as the flesh of my soul is another substance in relation to my soul, though in one man, more than the soul of another man is in relation to my soul. When, then, he has handed over the kingdom to God the Father, that is, when he has brought those who believe and live by faith, for whom the mediator now intercedes, to the contemplation for whose attainment we sigh and groan, and when the labor and groaning have passed away, he will no longer intercede for us, the kingdom having been handed over to God the Father. Signifying this, he says: "I have said these things to you in likenesses; the hour will come when I will no longer speak to you in likenesses, but will tell you plainly of the Father"; that is, there will no longer be likenesses when the vision is face to face. For this is what he means by "but will tell you plainly of the Father," as if he said, "I will show you the Father plainly." For he says "I will tell" because he is his Word. For he goes on to say: "In that day you will ask in my name, and I do not say to you that I will ask the Father; for the Father himself loves you, because you have loved me and have believed that I came out from God. I came out from the Father and came into this world; again I am leaving the world and going to the Father." What is "I came out from the Father" but "I appeared not in the form in which I am equal to the Father, but otherwise, that is, as less, in the creature I took"? And what is "I came into this world" but "I showed the form of a servant, which I took when I emptied myself, even to the eyes of sinners who love this world"? And what is "Again I am leaving the world" but "I am taking away from the sight of the lovers of the world what they have seen"? And what is "I am going to the Father" but "I am teaching my faithful to understand me as I am equal to the Father"? Those who believe this will be counted worthy to be brought from faith to sight, that is, to the vision itself, and in bringing them there he is said to hand over the kingdom to God the Father. For his faithful, whom he redeemed with his blood, for whom he now intercedes, are called his kingdom; but then, making them cleave to himself there where he is equal to the Father, he will no longer ask the Father for them. "For the Father himself," he says, "loves you." For he asks by reason of that in which he is less than the Father; but by reason of that in which he is equal, he hears prayer together with the Father. Hence he certainly does not separate himself from what he said, "For the Father himself loves you"; but he makes it understood according to what I recalled above and have sufficiently shown: that very often each person in the Trinity is named in such a way that the others are understood there too. So, then, "For the Father himself loves you" is said in such a way that the Son and the Holy Spirit are understood as well: not that he does not love us now, he who did not spare his own Son but handed him over for us all; but God loves us as we shall be, not as we are. For such as he loves, such he keeps forever; and this will be when he who now intercedes for us has handed over the kingdom to God the Father, so that he no longer asks the Father, because the Father himself loves us. And by what merit, except that of faith, by which we believe before we see what is promised? For through it we shall come to sight, so that he may love us as such as he loves us that we may be, not such as he hates because we are, and exhorts and enables us not to wish to be so forever.

John 16:22 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 10:39 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 10:42 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:28 (allusion, high confidence) · Rom 8:26 (allusion, high confidence) · Ps 27:4 (26:4 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:24 (allusion, high confidence) · John 16:25 (quotation, high confidence) · John 16:26 (quotation, high confidence) · John 16:27 (quotation, high confidence) · John 16:28 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 8:32 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Augustine explains that when Christ hands over the kingdom, believers will pass from faith to the contemplation of the whole Trinity, prefigured by Mary of Bethany, and Christ as priest will no longer need to intercede for them.

  • Quotations: John 16:22; Luke 10:39–42; 1 Cor 15:28; Rom 8:26; Ps 27:4 (Ps 26:4 Vulgate); 1 Cor 15:24–28; John 16:25–28; Rom 8:32.
  • 'The man is rather another substance in the Son than the Son is in the Father': Augustine's point is that the humanity differs in substance from the Son's divinity, while the Son does not differ in substance from the Father; translated literally.
  • 'Because the Father himself loves us': the digital text reads 'uniat' (OCR slip); translated as 'amat' (loves), which the context requires.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (leaked paragraph number (21) of the print, misread by OCR): animam meam. i I. Cum → animam meam. Cum.

Topics: Trinity, Christology, Eschatology

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Trin. 1.10 (PL 42:833–835; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-trinitate/1-7/#p-1-10). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-trinitate-1-10) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text of the Open Greek and Latin project); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation in NPNF¹ 3 (1887).

1.11PL 42:835

Quapropter, co­ gnita ista regula intelligendarum Scripturarum de Filio Dei, ut distinguamus quid in eis sonet secun­ dum formam Dei, in qua:.'qualis est Patri, et quid secundum formam servi qnam accepit, in qua minor cst Patre, non conturbabimur tanquam contrariis ac repugnantibus inter se sanctorum Librorurn senten­ tiis. Nam secundum formam Oei æqualis est Patri et Filius et Spiritus sanctus, quia neuter eorum creatura est, sicut jam ostendimus: secundum autem formam servi, minor cst Patre, qnia ipse dixit: Pater major me est: minor est se fpso, quia de illo dictum est, Semetipsum exinanivit (Philipp. n, 7): minor est Spiritu sancto, qnia ipse ait, Qui dixerit blasphemiam in Filium hominis, remittetur ei; qui au­ tem dixerit in Spiritum sanctum, non remittetur ei. Et in ipso virtutes opcratus est, di­ cens: Sl ego in Spiritu Dei ejicio dæmonia, certe supervenit super vos regnum Dei ( Luc. xi, 20). Et apud Isaiam dicit, quam lectionem ipse in synagoga recita­ vit, et de se completam sine scrupulo dubilationis ostendit. Spiritus, inquit, Domini super me; propter quod unxit me, evangelizare pauperibus misit me, pradicare captivis remissionem (Isai. LXI, i; Luc. IV, 18, 19), et cætera: ad quæ facienda idco dicit se inis­ sum, quia Spiritus Domini est super cum. Secundum formam Dei, omnia per ipsum facta sunt: secundum formam servi, ipsc far Ius est ex muliere, factus sub Lege ( Galat. iv, 4). Secundum formam Dei, ipse et Pater unum sunt: secun­ dum formam servi, non venit facere voluntatem suam, sed voluntatcm ejus qui cum misit. S cun­ dum formam Dei, sicut habet Pater vitam in semetipso, sic dedit et Filio vitam habere in semetipso: secundum formam servi, tristis est anima ejus usque ad mortem; et, Pater, inquit, si fieri potest, transeat a me iste calix. Secundum for­ mam Dei, ipse est verus Deus et vita æterna ( I Joan. v, 20): secundum formam servi, factus est obediens usque ad mortem, mortem autem crucis. Sccundum formam Dei, omnia quæ habet Pa­ tcr, ipsius sunt ( Joan. XVI, 15 ): ct, Omnia mea tua sunt, inquit, et tun mea2 ( Id. XVII, 10). Secundum formam servi, non est doctrina ipsius, sed illius qui cum misit.

Therefore, once this rule for understanding the Scriptures about the Son of God is known, so that we distinguish what in them sounds according to the form of God, in which he is equal to the Father, and what according to the form of a servant which he took, in which he is less than the Father, we shall not be troubled by statements of the holy books that seem contrary and in conflict with one another. For according to the form of God both the Son and the Holy Spirit are equal to the Father, because neither of them is a creature, as we have already shown; but according to the form of a servant the Son is less than the Father, because he himself said, "The Father is greater than I"; he is less than himself, because it is said of him, "He emptied himself"; he is less than the Holy Spirit, because he himself says, "Whoever speaks blasphemy against the Son of Man, it will be forgiven him; but whoever speaks against the Holy Spirit, it will not be forgiven him." And it was in the Spirit that he worked mighty deeds, saying, "If I cast out demons by the Spirit of God, surely the kingdom of God has come upon you." And in Isaiah, in the reading which he himself read aloud in the synagogue and showed, without a trace of doubt, to be fulfilled in himself, he says, "The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he has anointed me; he has sent me to preach good news to the poor, to proclaim release to the captives," and the rest; and for doing these things he says that he was sent for this reason, that the Spirit of the Lord is upon him. According to the form of God, all things were made through him; according to the form of a servant, he himself was made of a woman, made under the Law. According to the form of God, he and the Father are one; according to the form of a servant, he did not come to do his own will but the will of him who sent him. According to the form of God, "as the Father has life in himself, so he has granted the Son also to have life in himself"; according to the form of a servant, his soul is sorrowful even to death, and "Father," he says, "if it is possible, let this cup pass from me." According to the form of God, he is the true God and eternal life; according to the form of a servant, he became obedient to death, even death on a cross. According to the form of God, all things that the Father has are his, and "All mine are yours," he says, "and yours are mine"; according to the form of a servant, the teaching is not his own but that of him who sent him.

John 14:28 (quotation, high confidence) · Phil 2:7 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 12:32 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 11:20 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 12:28 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 61:1 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 4:18 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 4:19 (quotation, high confidence) · John 1:3 (allusion, high confidence) · Gal 4:4 (allusion, high confidence) · John 10:30 (allusion, high confidence) · John 6:38 (allusion, high confidence) · John 5:26 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 26:38 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 26:39 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 John 5:20 (allusion, high confidence) · Phil 2:8 (allusion, high confidence) · John 16:15 (allusion, high confidence) · John 17:10 (quotation, high confidence) · John 7:16 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Augustine applies his rule to a series of texts: according to the form of God the Son is equal to the Father, according to the form of a servant he is less than the Father, than himself, and even than the Holy Spirit.

  • Quotations: John 14:28; Phil 2:7; Matt 12:32; Luke 11:20 (with 'Spirit of God' as in Matt 12:28); Isa 61:1 and Luke 4:18–19; John 1:3; Gal 4:4; John 10:30; John 6:38; John 5:26; Matt 26:38–39; 1 John 5:20; Phil 2:8; John 16:15; John 17:10; John 7:16.

Topics: Christology, Trinity

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Trin. 1.11 (PL 42:835; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-trinitate/1-7/#p-1-11). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-trinitate-1-11) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text of the Open Greek and Latin project); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation in NPNF¹ 3 (1887).