Tractates on the Gospel of John 47.1–47.14

Latin text: Migne, PL 35 (Latin text: Migne, Patrologia Latina, digitized by Open Greek and Latin (patrologia_latina-dev, University of Leipzig), CC BY-SA 4.0).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0). Compare: Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, series 1, vol. 7 (1888).

Show

Chapter 47

47.1PL 35:1731–1733

Qui sermonem Dei nostri non solum libenter, sed etiam diligenter auditis, promissionis nostræ pro­ cui dubio meministis. Ipsa quippe lectio evangelica et hodie lecta est, quae lecta fuerat proximo domi­ nico die: propterea quoniam in quibusdam necessita­ tibus immorati, non patuimus omnia discutere quæ vestris sensibus debebamus. Proinde quæ jam dicta atque tractata sunt, hodie non quaerimus; ne adhuc eadem repetendo, ad illa quae nondum dicta sunt per­ venire minime permittamur. Nostis jam in nomine Domini qui sit bonus pastor, et quemadmodum pasto­ res boni membra sint ejus, et ideo pastor sit unus: nostis qui sit mercenarius ferendus; quis lupus, et fures, et latrones cavendi; quæ sint oves, quod sit ostium quo et oves ingrediuntur et pastor; quomodo sit intelligendus ostiarius: nostis etiam quoniam quis­ quis non per ostium intraverit, fur est et latro, nec venit nisi ut furetur, et occidat, et perdat. Hæc omnia dicta, sufficienter, quantum existimo, pertractata sunt. Hodie debemus dicere, quantum adjuvat Domi­ uus (quoniam ipse Jesus, Christus salvator noster et pastorem se esse dixit, et ostium, et pastorem bonum dixit intrare per ostium), quomodo ipse per seipsum intret. Si enim nemo pastor bonus est, nisi qui per ostium intrat, et ipse est præcipue pastor bonus, et ipse est ostium; intelligere non possum, nisi et ipsum per seipsum ad oves suas intrare, et vocem suam illis dare ut sequantur eum, easque intrantes et exeuntes pascua invenire, quod est vita æterna.

You who hear the word of our God not only gladly but also carefully no doubt remember our promise. For the same gospel reading has been read today that was read last Lord's day, because, delayed by certain necessities, we were not able to discuss everything we owed to your understanding. So what has already been said and treated we do not take up today, lest by repeating the same things we be prevented from reaching what has not yet been said. You already know, in the Lord's name, who the good shepherd is, and how good shepherds are his members, and therefore there is one shepherd. You know which hireling is to be tolerated; which wolf, and thieves, and robbers are to be guarded against; who the sheep are, what the door is by which both the sheep and the shepherd enter; how the doorkeeper is to be understood. You know too that whoever has not entered by the door is a thief and a robber, and comes only to steal and to kill and to destroy. All these things have been said and, I think, sufficiently treated. Today we must say, as far as the Lord helps—since Jesus Christ our Saviour himself said that he is both the shepherd and the door, and said that the good shepherd enters by the door—how he enters through himself. For if no one is a good shepherd except one who enters by the door, and he himself is preeminently the good shepherd, and he himself is the door, I can only understand that he himself enters to his sheep through himself, and gives them his voice so that they follow him, and that they, going in and going out, find pasture, which is eternal life.

John 10:10 (allusion, high confidence) · John 10:9 (allusion, high confidence) · John 10:11 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Augustine recalls the earlier sermon and proposes to show how Christ, being both shepherd and door, enters through himself.

  • John 10:1–11 is recalled.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip): hodie nou quaerimus → hodie non quaerimus; in nomme Domini → in nomine Domini; qui sil mercenarius → qui sit mercenarius; quoe sint oves → quæ sint oves; venit nist ut furetur, cL occidat, ct perdat. Hxc omnia → venit nisi ut furetur, et occidat, et perdat. Hæc omnia; salvator noster ct pastorem → salvator noster et pastorem; quomodo ipseper seijsum iniret → quomodo ipse per seipsum intret; per ostium intrat, ct ipse est præcipue pastor bonus, ct ipse → per ostium intrat, et ipse est præcipue pastor bonus, et ipse; ctvocem suam illis dare ut scqunntur cuti, easque intrantes et exeunles → et vocem suam illis dare ut sequantur eum, easque intrantes et exeuntes.

Topics: Christology

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Tract. Ev. Jo. 47.1 (PL 35:1731–1733; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-tractatus-ioannem/47-1/#p-47-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-tractatus-ioannem-47-1) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne PL 35 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin), then compared batch by batch with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 7 (Gibb and Innes, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.

47.2PL 35:1733

Cito ergo dico. Ego quærens intrare ad vos, id est ad cor vestrum, Christum prædico: si aliud præ­ dicem, per aliam partem conabor ascendere. Christus itaque mihi janua est ad vos; per Christum intro, non ad parietes vestros, sed ad corda vestra. Per Chri­ stum intro, Christum in me libenter audistis. Quare Christum in me libenter audistis? Quia oves Christi estis, sanguine Christi comparati estis. Agnoscitis prc­ lium vestrum: quod non a me datur, sed per me prædicatur. Ille quippe emit, qui pretiosum sangui­ nem fudit: pretiosus sanguis est illius sine peccato. Fecit tamen ipse etiam suorum sanguinem pretiosum, pro quibus dedit sanguinis pretium: nam si suorum sanguinem non faceret pretiosum, non diceretur, Pretiosa in conspectu Domini mors sanctorum ejus. Itaque etiam quod ait, Pastor bonus animam suam ponit pro ovibus, non ipse unus hoc fecit: et tamen si illi qui fecerunt membra ejus sunt, idem ipse unus hoc fecit. Ipse enim potuit facere sine illis; ipsi sine illo unde potuerunt, cum ipse dixerit, Sine me nihil potestis facere? Hinc autem osten­ dimus quod et alii fecerint, quia ipse apostolus Joan­ nIs, qui hoc quod audistis Evangelium prædicavit, in Epistola sua dixit: Sicut Christus pro nobis animam suam posuit, sic et nos debemus animas pro fratribus ponere. Debemus, dixit; debitores nos fecit qui primus exhibuit. Ideo quodam loco scriptum est: Si sederis cœnare ad mensam potentis, sapienter intellige quæ apponuntur tibi: et mitte manum tuam, sciens quia talia te oportet præparare. Mensa potentis quæ sit, nostis; ibi est cor­ pus et sanguis Christi: qui accedit ad talem mensam præparet talia. Et quid est, præparet talia? Quo­ modo ipse pro nobis animam suam posuit, sic et nos de­ bemus, ad ædificandam plebem et asserendam fidem, animas pro fratribus ponere. Ideo Petro quem facere volebat pastorem bonum, non in ipso Petro, sed in corpore suo ait: Petre, amas me? pasce oves meas. Hoc semel, hoc iterum, hoc tertio usque ad ejus tristitiam. Et cum tantum interrogasset Dominus, quantum iD­ terrogandum esse judicavit, ut ter confiteretur qui ter negaverat, et ei suas oves pascendas tertio commen­ dasset; ait illi, Cum junior esses, cingebas te, et ambu­ labas ubi volebas: cum autem senueris, extendes manus tuas, et alter te cinget, et ducet quo tu non vis. Et expo­ suit Evangelista quid Dominus dixerit: Hoc autem, inquit, dixit, significans qua morte clarificaturus esset Deum. Ad hoc ergo pertinet, Pasce oves meas: ut ponas animam tuam pro ovibus meis.

I say it briefly, then. When I seek to enter to you, that is, to your hearts, I preach Christ; if I were to preach something else, I would be trying to climb up another way. So Christ is my door to you; through Christ I enter, not to your walls, but to your hearts. Through Christ I enter: you have gladly heard Christ in me. Why have you gladly heard Christ in me? Because you are Christ's sheep; you were bought with Christ's blood. You recognize your price, which is not given by me but preached through me. For he bought you who shed precious blood: his blood, the blood of one without sin, is precious. Yet he made the blood of his own precious too, those for whom he gave the price of his blood; for if he had not made the blood of his own precious, it would not be said, “Precious in the sight of the Lord is the death of his saints.” So also what he says, “The good shepherd lays down his life for the sheep,” he alone has not done; and yet, if those who have done it are his members, he himself alone has done it. For he could do it without them; how could they do it without him, when he himself said, “Without me you can do nothing”? And we show from this that others too have done it: the apostle John himself, who preached this gospel that you have heard, said in his epistle, “As Christ laid down his life for us, so we too ought to lay down our lives for the brothers.” “We ought,” he said: he who first showed it made us debtors. Therefore it is written in a certain place, “If you sit down to dine at the table of a ruler, consider wisely what is set before you; and put out your hand, knowing that you must prepare such things.” You know what the ruler's table is: there are the body and blood of Christ. Whoever approaches such a table, let him prepare such things. And what is “let him prepare such things”? As he laid down his life for us, so we too ought, for building up the people and defending the faith, to lay down our lives for the brothers. Therefore to Peter, whom he wished to make a good shepherd—not in Peter himself, but in his body—he says, “Peter, do you love me? Feed my sheep.” This once, this again, this a third time, until he was grieved. And when the Lord had questioned him as much as he judged he should be questioned, so that he who had denied three times should confess three times, and when he had commended his sheep to him to feed a third time, he said to him, “When you were younger, you girded yourself and walked where you wished; but when you are old, you will stretch out your hands, and another will gird you and lead you where you do not wish.” And the evangelist explained what the Lord had said: “This he said,” he says, “signifying by what death he would glorify God.” This, then, is what “Feed my sheep” means: that you lay down your life for my sheep.

1 Pet 1:19 (allusion, medium confidence) · Ps 116:15 (115:6 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · John 10:11 (quotation, high confidence) · John 15:5 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 John 3:16 (quotation, high confidence) · Prov 23:1 (quotation, high confidence) · Prov 23:2 (quotation, medium confidence) · John 21:15 (quotation, high confidence) · John 21:17 (allusion, high confidence) · John 21:18 (quotation, high confidence) · John 21:19 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Augustine enters to his hearers through Christ the door; the good shepherd's laying down of his life is shared by his members, as John urges and as Christ foretold of Peter.

  • 1 Pet 1:19 (recalled), Ps 116:15 (LXX 115:6), John 10:11, John 15:5, 1 John 3:16, Prov 23:1–2 (in the Old Latin form), John 21:15–19 are quoted. The ruler's table is applied to the Eucharist; translated as written.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; leaked Migne reference removed): Christuin prædico → Christum prædico; Christus itaque milii janua → Christus itaque mihi janua; parietes veslros → parietes vestros; Quarc Christum in me libeuter → Quare Christum in me libenter; sanguine Cbristi → sanguine Christi; sed p< r me → sed per me; sine peccata → sine peccato; sanctorum cjus ( I'sul. cxv, i5). → sanctorum ejus.; pro (ratribu, ponere → pro fratribus ponere; sapienter I intellige → sapienter intellige; talem mensamy → talem mensam; sic et noa de → sic et nos de; asserendam iidem → asserendam fidem; Idco Petro → Ideo Petro; hoc Herum → hoc iterum; cum tautum interrogasset → cum tantum interrogasset; comraen­ dasset → commen­ dasset; Hoc autem inquit, dixit → Hoc autem, inquit, dixit.

Topics: Eucharist, Martyrdom, Church office

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Tract. Ev. Jo. 47.2 (PL 35:1733; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-tractatus-ioannem/47-1/#p-47-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-tractatus-ioannem-47-2) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne PL 35 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin), then compared batch by batch with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 7 (Gibb and Innes, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.

47.3PL 35:1733–1735

Jam illud quod ait, Sicut novit me Pater, et ego agnosco Patrem, quis nescit? Ipse enim agnoscit Pa­ trem per se, nos per illum. Quia ipse per se agnoscit, novimus: quia et nos per illum, etiam hoc novimus; quia et hoc per illum novimus. Ipse enim dixit: Deum nemo vidit unquam, nisi unigenitus Filius qui est in sinu Patris; ipse enarravit. Ergo et nos per ipsum, quibus enarravit. Item alibi ait: Nemo novit Filium, nisi Pater; neque Patrem quisquam novit, nisi Filius, et cui voluerit Filius revelare. Sicut ergo ipse per se novit Patrem, nos autem per illum novimus Patrem; sic intrat in ovile per semet­ ipsum, et nos per ipsum. Ostium dicebamus per Chri­ stum nos habere ad vos; quare? Quia Christum præ­ dicamus. Nos Christum prædicamus; et ideo per ostium intramus. Christus autem Christum prædicat, quia seipsum prædicat; et ideo pastor per seipsum intrat. Lumen cum alia monstrat quæ videntur in lu­ mine, numquid aliquo alio indiget ut monstretur? Lumen ergo et alia demonstrat et seipsum. Quaecum­ que intelligimus, intellectu intelligimus; ipsum in­ tellectum unde, nisi intellectu, intelligimus? Numquid sic oculo carnis et alia vides et ipsum? Quamvis enim videant homines oculis suis, non tamen vident oculos suos. Oculus carnis alia videt, se non potest: intel­ lectus autem et alia intelligit, et seipsum. Quomodo intellectus videt se, sic et Christus prædicat se. Si prædicat se, et prædicando intrat ad te, per se intrat ad te. Et ad Patrem ipse est ostium; quia non est qua veniatur ad Patrem, nisi per ipsum. Unus enim Deus et unus mediator Dei et hominum, homo Christus Jesus. Verbo multa dicuntur: hæc ipsa quæ dixi, utique verbo dixi. Si velim dicere et ipsum verbum, unde dico, nisi verbo? Ac per hoc per verbum et alia dicuntur, quæ non sunt quod verbum; et ipsum verbum dici non potest, nisi per verbum. Adjuvante Domino exemplis abundavi­ mus. Tenete ergo quomodo Dominus Jesus Christus et ostium sit, et pastor: ostium pandendo se, pastor intrando per se. Et quidem, fratres, quod pastor est, dedit et membris suis; nam et Petrus pastor, et Pau­ lus pastor, et cæteri Apostoli pastores, et boni epi­ scopi pastores. Ostium vero nemo nostrum se dicit; hoc sibi ipse proprium tenuit, qua intrent oves, De­ nique Paulus apostolus boni pastoris implebat offi­ cium, quando Christum praedicabat, quia per ostium intrabat. At ubi oves indisciplinate coeperunt facere schismata, et alia ostia sibi ponere, non qua intrarent ut congregarentur, sed qua errarent ut dividerentur, dicentes, alii, Ego sum Pauli; alii, Ego sum Cephæ; alii, Ego Apollo; alii, Ego Christi: expavescens ad eos qui dixerunt, Ego sum Pauli, tanquam clamans ad oves, Miseræ, qua itis? non sum ostium: Num­ quid Paulus, inquit, pro vobis crucifixus est? aut in no­ mine Pauli baptizati estis? Qui vero dicebant, Ego sum Christi, invenerant ostium.

Now as for his saying, “As the Father knows me, and I know the Father,” who does not understand it? For he knows the Father through himself, we through him. That he knows him through himself we know; that we too know him through him, this also we know; for this too we know through him. For he himself said, “No one has ever seen God, except the only-begotten Son, who is in the bosom of the Father; he has declared him.” So we know him through him, we to whom he has declared him. Likewise he says elsewhere, “No one knows the Son except the Father, nor does anyone know the Father except the Son, and anyone to whom the Son wills to reveal him.” As, then, he knows the Father through himself, but we know the Father through him, so he enters the fold through himself, and we through him. We were saying that through Christ we have a door to you. Why? Because we preach Christ. We preach Christ, and therefore we enter by the door. But Christ preaches Christ, because he preaches himself; and therefore the shepherd enters through himself. When light shows other things that are seen in the light, does it need anything else to be shown? Light, then, shows both other things and itself. Whatever we understand, we understand by the understanding; the understanding itself, by what do we understand it, but by the understanding? Do you in the same way see with the eye of the flesh both other things and the eye itself? For though people see with their eyes, they do not see their own eyes. The eye of the flesh sees other things; itself it cannot see. But the understanding understands both other things and itself. As the understanding sees itself, so also Christ preaches himself. If he preaches himself, and by preaching enters to you, he enters to you through himself. And to the Father he himself is the door, for there is no way by which one comes to the Father except through him. “For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus.” Many things are said by a word: these very things that I have said, I have surely said by a word. If I wish to speak of the word itself, by what do I speak but by a word? And so by a word other things are spoken which are not what a word is; and the word itself cannot be spoken except by a word. With the Lord's help we have given plenty of examples. Hold fast, then, how the Lord Jesus Christ is both door and shepherd: the door by opening himself, the shepherd by entering through himself. And indeed, brothers, his being shepherd he has given to his members also; for Peter is a shepherd, and Paul is a shepherd, and the other apostles are shepherds, and good bishops are shepherds. But none of us calls himself the door; this he kept as his own, that through him the sheep should enter. Indeed the apostle Paul was fulfilling the office of a good shepherd when he preached Christ, because he entered by the door. But when the sheep, without discipline, began to make schisms and to set up other doors for themselves—not by which they might enter to be gathered, but by which they might wander to be divided—some saying, “I am of Paul,” others, “I am of Cephas,” others, “I of Apollos,” others, “I of Christ,” he was horrified at those who said, “I am of Paul,” and, as if crying out to the sheep, “Poor things, where are you going? I am not the door,” he says, “Was Paul crucified for you? Or were you baptized in the name of Paul?” But those who said, “I am of Christ,” had found the door.

John 10:15 (quotation, high confidence) · John 1:18 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 11:27 (quotation, high confidence) · John 14:6 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Tim 2:5 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 1:12 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 1:13 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Christ enters through himself because he preaches himself, as light shows itself; he shares the office of shepherd with apostles and good bishops but keeps being the door as his own.

  • John 10:15, John 1:18, Matt 11:27, John 14:6 (recalled), 1 Tim 2:5 and 1 Cor 1:12–13 are quoted.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip): hoc p er illum → hoc per illum; Ergo it nos per ipsum, quibus cnarravil → Ergo et nos per ipsum, quibus enarravit; Nemo novit bilium → Nemo novit Filium; nos autem pcr illum → nos autem per illum; et nos per ipsum Ostium dicebamus per. Chri → et nos per ipsum. Ostium dicebamus per Chri; Cbristum præ → Christum præ; et idco per ostium → et ideo per ostium; quia scipsum → quia seipsum; quai videnrur in in­ mine → quæ videntur in lu­ mine; Lumen crgo → Lumen ergo; Quaecum­ quc intelligimus → Quaecum­ que intelligimus; Numqu d sic → Numquid sic; oculis. suis → oculis suis; Oculus carnis alia vidct, se non potest: inte!­ lectus autcm → Oculus carnis alia videt, se non potest: intel­ lectus autem; per se J intrat → per se intrat; quia { non est → quia non est; Unus enim l eus et unus mcdiator → Unus enim Deus et unus mediator; dicun. tur → dicuntur; Ac per boc → Ac per hoc; dicuntur, qu.c non → dicuntur, quæ non; ostium sil, et pastor: os:ium → ostium sit, et pastor: ostium; Ostium vero ncmo nostrum sc dicit → Ostium vero nemo nostrum se dicit; coepcrunt facere I schismata → coeperunt facere schismata; qua intrarent iI ut → qua intrarent ut; Ego Apello; alii, Ego Chritli → Ego Apollo; alii, Ego Christi; in no­ minc Pauli baptizati eatis? Qui vcro → in no­ mine Pauli baptizati estis? Qui vero.

Topics: Christology, Church office

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Tract. Ev. Jo. 47.3 (PL 35:1733–1735; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-tractatus-ioannem/47-1/#p-47-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-tractatus-ioannem-47-3) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne PL 35 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin), then compared batch by batch with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 7 (Gibb and Innes, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.

47.4PL 35:1735

De uno autem ovili et uno pastore, jam quidem assidue soletis audire: multum enim commendavimus unum ovile, praedicantes unitatem, ut per Christum omnes oves ingrederentur, et Donatum nulla seque­ retur. Verumtamen unde hoc proprie dixerit Dominus, satis apparet. Loquebatur enim apud Judæos, missus autem fuerat ad ipsos Judæos, non propter quosdam immani odio pertinaces et perseverantes in tenebris, sed propter quosdam in ipsa gente quos dicit oves suas: de quibus ait, Non sum missus nisi ad oves quæ perierunt domus Israel. Noverat etiam eos in turba furentium, et praevidebat in pace creden­ tium. Quid est ergo, Non sum missus nisi ad oves quæ perierunt domus Israel; nisi quia praesentiam suam corporalem non exhibuit nisi populo Israel? Ad Gen­ tes non perrexit ipse, sed misit: ad populum vero Israel et misit, et venit ipse; ut qui contemnebant, majus judicium sumerent, quia et præsentia est illis exhibita. Ipse Dominus ibi fuit, ibi matrem elegit; ibi concipi, ibi nasci, ibi sanguinem fundere voluit; ibi sunt vestigia ejus, modo adorantur, ubi novissi­ me stetit, unde ascendit in caelum: ad Gentes autem misit.

About the one fold and the one shepherd you are already used to hearing constantly; for we have strongly commended the one fold, preaching unity, so that all the sheep might enter through Christ and none follow Donatus. Yet why the Lord said this in particular is plain enough. For he was speaking among the Jews, and he had been sent to the Jews themselves—not on account of some who persisted in monstrous hatred and remained in darkness, but on account of some in that very nation whom he calls his sheep, of whom he says, “I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.” He knew them even in the raging crowd, and he foresaw them in the peace of believers. What, then, is “I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel,” except that he showed his bodily presence only to the people of Israel? To the Gentiles he did not go himself, but sent; but to the people of Israel he both sent and came himself, so that those who despised him would receive the greater judgment, because his presence too was shown to them. The Lord himself was there; there he chose his mother; there he willed to be conceived, there to be born, there to shed his blood; there are his footprints, now venerated, where he last stood, from where he ascended into heaven. But to the Gentiles he sent.

John 10:16 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 15:24 (quotation, high confidence) · Acts 1:12 (allusion, low confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Christ came in person only to Israel, where his saving presence was shown, but sent his messengers to the Gentiles; the one fold excludes following Donatus.

  • John 10:16 (the one fold) and Matt 15:24 are quoted. Donatus is the founder of the Donatist schism. “Venerated” renders “adorantur”; the footprints of Christ on the Mount of Olives were shown to pilgrims (Acts 1:12 is recalled). Augustine on the Jews is translated as written.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip): De uno antem ovili et uno pastore, jam quidcm → De uno autem ovili et uno pastore, jam quidem; salis apparet → satis apparet; apud Judicos → apud Judæos; ipsos Judxos → ipsos Judæos; gente quas dicit → gente quos dicit; de quibas ait → de quibus ait; ad oves quat perierunt → ad oves quæ perierunt; Noverat ctiam → Noverat etiam; Son sum missus → Non sum missus; stelit → stetit.

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Tract. Ev. Jo. 47.4 (PL 35:1735; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-tractatus-ioannem/47-1/#p-47-4). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-tractatus-ioannem-47-4) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne PL 35 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin), then compared batch by batch with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 7 (Gibb and Innes, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.

47.5PL 35:1735

Sed forte aliquis arbitratur, quoniam non ipse ad nos venit, sed misit ad nos, non nos audisse vocem ipsius, sed vocem eorum quos misit. Absit; pellatur ista cogitatio de cordibus vestris: et in his quos misit ipse erat. Ipsum Paulum audi quem misit; ad Gentes enim præcipue Paulum misit apostolum: et ait ipse Paulus terrens non de se, sed de illo, An vultis accipere experimentum ejus qui in me loquitur Christi? Audite et ipsum Dominum. Et alias oves ha­ beo, id est, in Gentibus: quæ non sunt de hoc ovili, id est de populo Israel: oportet me et illas adducere. Ergo et per suos non alter adducit. Adhuc audi: Vocem meam audient. Ecce et per suos ipse loquitur, et per eos quos mittit vox ejus auditur. Ut sit unum ovile et unus pastor. Duobus istis gregibus tanquam duobus parietibus, factus est lapis angularis. Ergo et ostium est, et lapis angularis: omnia per similitudinem, nihil horum proprie.

But perhaps someone thinks that, since he did not come to us himself but sent to us, we have not heard his voice, but the voice of those whom he sent. Far from it; let that thought be driven from your hearts: he himself was in those whom he sent. Hear Paul himself, whom he sent—for he sent the apostle Paul chiefly to the Gentiles—and Paul himself says, alarming them not about himself but about him, “Do you want proof of Christ who speaks in me?” Hear the Lord himself too: “And I have other sheep”—that is, among the Gentiles—“which are not of this fold”—that is, of the people of Israel—“I must bring them also.” So it is not another but he who brings them, even through his own. Hear further: “They will hear my voice.” See, he himself speaks through his own, and his voice is heard through those whom he sends. “That there may be one fold and one shepherd.” Of these two flocks, as of two walls, he was made the cornerstone. So he is both the door and the cornerstone: all by likeness, none of these properly.

2 Cor 13:3 (quotation, high confidence) · John 10:16 (quotation, high confidence) · Eph 2:20 (allusion, high confidence) · Ps 118:22 (117:22 LXX) (allusion, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Christ speaks in those he sends, so the Gentiles hear his own voice; from Jews and Gentiles he makes one fold, as the cornerstone joins two walls.

  • 2 Cor 13:3, John 10:16 and Eph 2:20 (with Ps 118:22) are quoted or recalled.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip): prircipne Paulum → præcipue Paulum; ipse Pautus terrens → ipse Paulus terrens; Audite ct ipsum Dominum. Et alias oves ha­ bco → Audite et ipsum Dominum. Et alias oves ha­ beo; ovile el unus pastor → ovile et unus pastor; cl lupis angularis → et lapis angularis.

Topics: Christology

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Tract. Ev. Jo. 47.5 (PL 35:1735; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-tractatus-ioannem/47-1/#p-47-5). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-tractatus-ioannem-47-5) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne PL 35 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin), then compared batch by batch with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 7 (Gibb and Innes, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.

47.6PL 35:1735

Jam enim dixi, et commendavi vehementer; et qui capiunt sapiunt, imo qui sapiunt capiunt; et qui nondum intellectu sapiunt, fide teneant quod intelli­ gere nondum possunt. Per similitudinem Christus multa est quæ per proprietatem non est. Per similitu­ dinem et petra est Christus, et ostium est Christus, et lapis angularis est Christus, et pastor est Christus, et agnus est Christus, et leo est Christus. Quam multa per similitudines, et alia, quae commemorare longum est! Si autem proprietates discutias rerum quas videre consuesti; nec petra est, quia durus et sine sensu non est; nec ostium est, quia faber eum non fecit; nec lapis angularis est, quia non est ab structore compo­ situs; nec pastor est, quia custos ovium quadrupe­ dum non est; nec leo est, quia fera non est; nec agnus est, quia pecus non est. Omnia ergo ista per similitudinem. Quid ergo proprie? In principio erat Verbum, et Verbum erat apud Deum, et Deus erat Ver­ bum. Quid de homine qui apparuit? Et Verbum caro factum est, et habitavit in nobis.

For I have already said it and strongly commended it—those who grasp it are wise, or rather those who are wise grasp it—and let those who are not yet wise in understanding hold by faith what they cannot yet understand: by likeness Christ is many things which by proper sense he is not. By likeness Christ is the rock, Christ is the door, Christ is the cornerstone, Christ is the shepherd, Christ is the lamb, Christ is the lion. How many things by likenesses, and others which it would take long to recount! But if you examine the proper senses of the things you are used to seeing, he is not a rock, for he is not hard and without feeling; nor a door, for no carpenter made him; nor a cornerstone, for he was not set in place by a builder; nor a shepherd, for he is not a keeper of four-footed sheep; nor a lion, for he is not a wild beast; nor a lamb, for he is not a farm animal. All these, then, are by likeness. What, then, properly? “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.” What of the man who appeared? “And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us.”

John 1:1 (quotation, high confidence) · John 1:14 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 10:4 (allusion, medium confidence) · Rev 5:5 (allusion, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Christ is rock, door, cornerstone, shepherd, lamb and lion by likeness; properly he is the eternal Word who became flesh.

  • John 1:1 and 1:14 are quoted.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip): vehementer, ei qui → vehementer; et qui; intenfectu → intellectu; multa est quæ pcr proprietatem → multa est quæ per proprietatem; et petra cst Christus → et petra est Christus; Chiistus, ct pastor → Christus, et pastor; ot leo est → et leo est; Si antem propriet nes discutias rerum qnas → Si autem proprietates discutias rerum quas; nee lapis angularis → nec lapis angularis; quia noN est ab structore confbo­ situs → quia non est ab structore compo­ situs; ovium quadtupe­ dum → ovium quadrupe­ dum; agnus cst, quia 'pecus non est. Omnia ergo ista pet → agnus est, quia pecus non est. Omnia ergo ista per.

Topics: Christology

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Tract. Ev. Jo. 47.6 (PL 35:1735; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-tractatus-ioannem/47-1/#p-47-6). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-tractatus-ioannem-47-6) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne PL 35 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin), then compared batch by batch with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 7 (Gibb and Innes, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.

47.7PL 35:1735

Audi et cætera. Propterea me Pater diligit, inquit; quia ego pono animam meam, ut iterum sumam eam. Quid ait? Propterea me Pater diligit: quia morior ut resurgam. Cum magno enim pondere dictum est, ego: Quia ego pono, inquit, pono animam meam, ego pono. Quid est, ego pono? Ego illam pono: non glo­ rientur Judæi; sævire potuerunt, potestatem habere non potuerunt: sæviant quantum possunt; si ego no­ luero animam meam ponere, quid sæviendo facturi sunt? Una responsione prostrati sunt: quando eis dictum est, Quem quæritis? dixerunt, Jesum; et ait eis, Ego sum: redierunt retro, et ceciderunt. Qui ceciderunt ad unam vocem Christi morituri, quid facient sub voce judicaturi? Ego, ego, inquam, pono animam meam, ut iterum sumam eam. Non glo­ rientur Judaei, quasi praevaluerint: ipse posuit animam suam. Ego dormivi, dicit. Nostis Psalmum: Ego dor­ mivi, et somnum cepi; et exsurrexi, quoniam Dominus suscipiet me. Modo Psalmus ipse lectus est, modo audivimus: Ego dormivi, et somnum cepi; et exsurrexi, quoniam Dominus suscipiet me. Quid est, Ego dormivi? Quia volui, dormivi. Quid est, dormivi? Mortuus sum. Nonne dormivit, qui quando voluit, de sepulcro tanquam de lecto surrexit? Sed amat dare gloriam Patri, ut nos ædificet gloriam dare Creatori. Nam quod addidit, exsurrexi, quoniam Dominus sus­ cipiet me; putatis hic quasi virtutem ejus defecisse, ut per potestatem suam mori potuerit, per potestatem suam resurgere non potuerit? Sic enim videntur sonare verba non intentius intellecta, Ego dormivi; id est, quia volui, dormivi. Et exsurrexi: quare? Quia Domi­ nus suscipiet me. Quid enim, tu a teipso resurgere non valeres? Si non valeres, non diceres, Potestatem ha­ beo ponendi animam meam, et potestatem habeo iterum sumendi eam. Audi alio loco in Evangelio, quia non solum Pater suscitavit Filium, sed etiam Filius seip­ sum. Solvite, inquit, templum hoc, et in triduo suscitabo illud. Et Evangelista: Hoc autem, inquit, dicebat de templo corporis sui. Hoc enim sus­ citabatur quod moriebatur. Nam Verbum non est mor­ tuum, anima illa non est mortua. Si nec tua moritur, Domini moreretur?

Hear the rest too. “For this reason the Father loves me,” he says, “because I lay down my life, that I may take it again.” What does he say? For this reason the Father loves me: because I die that I may rise again. For “I” was said with great weight: “Because I lay down,” he says, “I lay down my life; I lay it down.” What is “I lay it down”? I lay it down: let the Jews not boast. They were able to rage; they were not able to have power. Let them rage as much as they can: if I do not wish to lay down my life, what will they accomplish by raging? They were laid low by one answer: when it was said to them, “Whom do you seek?” they said, “Jesus”; and he said to them, “I am he”; they went backward and fell down. Those who fell at one word of Christ when he was about to die—what will they do under the voice of Christ when he comes to judge? “I, I,” I say, “lay down my life, that I may take it again.” Let the Jews not boast as though they had prevailed: he himself laid down his life. “I slept,” he says. You know the psalm: “I slept, and took my rest; and I rose up, because the Lord will uphold me.” The psalm itself was read just now; we heard just now, “I slept, and took my rest; and I rose up, because the Lord will uphold me.” What is “I slept”? Because I willed it, I slept. What is “I slept”? I died. Did he not sleep, who, when he willed, rose from the tomb as from a bed? But he loves to give glory to the Father, so as to build us up to give glory to the Creator. As for his adding, “and I rose up, because the Lord will uphold me,” do you think that here his strength as it were failed, so that he could die by his own power but could not rise by his own power? For so the words seem to sound when not understood more attentively: “I slept,” that is, because I willed it, I slept; “and I rose up”: why? “Because the Lord will uphold me.” What then, were you not able to rise of yourself? If you were not able, you would not say, “I have power to lay down my life, and I have power to take it again.” Hear in another place in the Gospel that not only did the Father raise the Son, but the Son also raised himself. “Destroy,” he says, “this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.” And the evangelist: “But he spoke,” he says, “of the temple of his body.” For what was raised was what was dying. For the Word did not die; that soul did not die. If not even yours dies, would the Lord's die?

John 10:17 (quotation, high confidence) · John 10:18 (quotation, high confidence) · John 18:4 (quotation, high confidence) · John 18:5 (quotation, high confidence) · John 18:6 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 3:5 (3:6 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · John 2:19 (quotation, high confidence) · John 2:21 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Christ lays down his life by his own will and power, so the Jews cannot boast; he also raised himself, as the temple saying shows, though he gives the glory to the Father.

  • John 10:17–18, John 18:4–6, Ps 3:5 (LXX 3:6) and John 2:19, 21 are quoted. “Life” and “soul” both render “anima”; in what follows Augustine moves between the two senses. His words on the Jews are translated as written.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip): Audi et extera → Audi et cætera; inquit; qnia ego → inquit; quia ego; pono animnm meam → pono animam meam; non gio­ ricntur Judæi; sævire potuerunt, potestatem hahere → non glo­ rientur Judæi; sævire potuerunt, potestatem habere; quid sxvicndo → quid sæviendo; quando cis dictum est → quando eis dictum est; et ait cis, Ego → et ait eis, Ego; morituriL quid → morituri, quid; Non gio­ ricntur Judaei → Non glo­ rientur Judaei; Icctus est → lectus est; Scd amat → Sed amat; resurgere no n valeres? Si non valeres, non diccres → resurgere non valeres? Si non valeres, non diceres; ponendi animan meam → ponendi animam meam; sed eliam Filius scip­ sum → sed etiam Filius seip­ sum; dicebct de templo → dicebat de templo; Hoc enirn sus → Hoc enim sus; mor­ luum → mor­ tuum; Si nec tua morimur → Si nec tua moritur.

Topics: Christology

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Tract. Ev. Jo. 47.7 (PL 35:1735; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-tractatus-ioannem/47-1/#p-47-7). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-tractatus-ioannem-47-7) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne PL 35 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin), then compared batch by batch with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 7 (Gibb and Innes, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.

47.8PL 35:1735–1737

Unde scio, inquis, si mea non moritur? A te non occidatur, et non moritur. Quomodo, inquis, ego possum occidere animam meam? Ut alia peccata in­ terim taceam, Os quod mentitur, occidit animam. Quomodo, inquis, securus sum, quia non mo­ ritur? Ipsum Dominum audi dantem servo securita­ tem: Nolite timere eos qui occidunt corpus, et postea non habent quid faciant. Sed plane quid ait? Eum ti­ mete qui habet potestatem et corpus et animam occidere in gehenna. Ecce quia moritur, ecce quia non moritur. Quid est mori ipsius? Quid est mori carni tuæ? Mori carni tuae, est amittere vitam suam: mori animæ tuae, est amittere vitam suam. Vita carnis tuæ, anima tua: vita animae tuae, Deus tuus. Quomodo moritur caro amissa anima, quae vita est ejus; sic moritur anima amisso Deo, qui vita est ejus. Certe ergo immortalis est anima. Plane im­ mortalis, quia vivit et mortua. Quod enim de vidua deliciosa dixit Apostolus, etiam de anima, si Deum suum amiserit, dici potest, Vivens mortua est.

“How do I know,” you say, “whether mine does not die?” Do not kill it, and it does not die. “How,” you say, “can I kill my soul?” To pass over other sins for the moment: “The mouth that lies kills the soul.” “How,” you say, “am I sure that it does not die?” Hear the Lord himself giving his servant assurance: “Do not fear those who kill the body, and afterward have nothing that they can do.” But what does he plainly say? “Fear him who has power to kill both body and soul in Gehenna.” See: it dies; see: it does not die. What is its dying? What is it for your flesh to die? For your flesh to die is to lose its life; for your soul to die is to lose its life. The life of your flesh is your soul; the life of your soul is your God. As the flesh dies when it loses the soul, which is its life, so the soul dies when it loses God, who is its life. Certainly, then, the soul is immortal. Plainly immortal, for it lives even when dead. For what the apostle said of the widow who lives in pleasure can also be said of the soul if it has lost its God: “Living, she is dead.”

Luke 12:4 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 10:28 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Tim 5:6 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The soul does not die naturally, but it dies when it loses God, its life, as the body dies when it loses the soul.

  • Wis 1:11 (outside the 66 books), Luke 12:4–5 (with Matt 10:28) and 1 Tim 5:6 are quoted.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip): A le non → A te non; inquis, cgo possum → inquis, ego possum; terim lacoam → terim taceam; non habent quid faciant. Sed plane quid ait? Eum ti­ nu te → non habent quid faciant. Sed plane quid ait? Eum ti­ mete; Quid est mori ipsius? j quid → Quid est mori ipsius? Quid; amissa anima, qnae vita est cjus → amissa anima, quae vita est ejus; qui vita i est ejus → qui vita est ejus; dcliciosa → deliciosa; Vivent mortua est → Vivens mortua est.

Extrabiblical texts: Wis 1:11 (Wisdom of Solomon [in RC, EO, ETH canons]; quotation)

Topics: Ethics

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Tract. Ev. Jo. 47.8 (PL 35:1735–1737; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-tractatus-ioannem/47-1/#p-47-8). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-tractatus-ioannem-47-8) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne PL 35 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin), then compared batch by batch with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 7 (Gibb and Innes, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.

47.9PL 35:1737

Quomodo ergo ponit animam suam Dominus? Fratres, quaeramus hoc paulo attentius. Non nos ar­ ctat hora quæ solet die dominico: vacat nobis, hoc lucrentur qui ad verbum Dei etiam die hodierna con­ veniunt. Pono, inquit, animam meam. Quis ponit? quam ponit? Quid est Christus? Verbum et homo. Nec sic homo ut sola caro: sed quia homo, constat ex carne et anima, totus autem homo in Christo. Non enim partem deteriorem suscepisset, et partem melio­ rem deseruisset: pars quippe hominis melior est ani­ ma quam corpus. Quia ergo totus homo in Christo, quid est Christus? Verbum, inquam, et homo. Quid est Verbum et homo? Verbum, anima et caro. Tenete hoc, quia non defuerunt haeretici et in ista sententia, pulsi quidem jam olim a veritate catholica: sed tamen ut fures et latrones non intrantes per ostium, insidiari ovili non desinunt. Apollinaristae hæretici dicti sunt, qui ausi sunt dogmatizare quod Christus non sit nisi Verbum et caro: animam humanam non eum assumpsisse contendunt. Nam et aliqui eorum fuisse in Christo animam, negare non potuerunt. Videte absur­ ditatem et insaniam non ferendam. Animam irratio­ nalem eum habere voluerunt, rationalem negaverunt: dederunt ei animam pecoris, subtraxerunt hominis. Sed illi abstulerunt Christo rationem, non tenendo ra­ tionem. Absit hoc a nobis, in fide catholica nutritis atque fundatis. Ex hac ergo occasione admonuerim Charitatem vestram, ut quomodo superioribus lectio­ nibus satis vos instruximus adversus Sabellianos et Arianos; Sabellianos qui dicunt, Ipse est Pater qui Filius; Arianos qui dicunt, Aliud est Pater, aliud est Filius, quasi non sint ejusdem substantiæ Pater et Fi­ lius: instruximus etiam, quantum meministis, et me­ minisse debetis, contra haereticos Photinianos, qui solum hominem Christum sine Deo esse dixerunt; contra Manichæos, qui solum sine homine Deum: ex hac occasione de anima instruamus vos et contra Apollinaristas, qui dicunt Dominum nostrum Jesum Christum non habuisse animam humanam, id est ani­ mam rationalem, animam intelligentem, animam, in­ quam, in qua distamus a pecore, quod homines sumus.

How, then, does the Lord lay down his life? Brothers, let us look into this a little more attentively. The hour that usually presses on us on the Lord's day does not constrain us: we have time; let those who gather for the word of God even on this day profit by it. “I lay down,” he says, “my life.” Who lays it down? What does he lay down? What is Christ? Word and man. And not man in the sense of flesh only; but because he is man, he consists of flesh and soul, and the whole man is in Christ. For he would not have taken up the worse part and left out the better part; and the better part of a human being is the soul rather than the body. Since, then, the whole man is in Christ, what is Christ? The Word, I say, and man. What is the Word and man? The Word, soul, and flesh. Hold fast to this, because there have not been lacking heretics on this point too, driven long ago, indeed, from the Catholic truth, yet, like thieves and robbers who do not enter by the door, they do not cease to lie in wait for the fold. They were called the Apollinarian heretics, who dared to teach as dogma that Christ is only Word and flesh; they contend that he did not take a human soul. Yet some of them could not deny that there was a soul in Christ. See the absurdity and the intolerable madness. They would have him have an irrational soul; they denied him a rational one. They gave him the soul of a beast; they took away that of a man. But they took reason from Christ by not keeping to reason. Far be this from us, who have been nourished and founded in the Catholic faith. So I would take this occasion to admonish your Charity: as in the earlier readings we instructed you sufficiently against the Sabellians and the Arians—the Sabellians, who say that the Father is the same as the Son; the Arians, who say that the Father is one thing and the Son another, as if the Father and the Son were not of the same substance—and as we also instructed you, as you remember and ought to remember, against the Photinian heretics, who said that Christ was only a man without God, and against the Manichees, who say he was only God without man—so on this occasion let us instruct you about the soul also against the Apollinarians, who say that our Lord Jesus Christ did not have a human soul, that is, a rational soul, an intelligent soul—the soul, I say, by which we differ from the beast in being human.

John 10:18 (quotation, high confidence) · John 10:1 (allusion, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Christ is the Word, a human soul, and flesh; Augustine warns against the Apollinarians, who deny Christ a rational human soul, as he earlier warned against Sabellians, Arians, Photinians and Manichees.

  • John 10:17–18 is quoted. Apollinaris of Laodicea taught that the divine Word took the place of the human mind in Christ; Augustine's account is given as written.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip): ar­ ctit hora quæ solet die dominico I: → ar­ ctat hora quæ solet die dominico:; quam ponit I? → quam ponit?; Nee sic homo → Nec sic homo; sed quia horno → sed quia homo; et caro, Tenete → et caro. Tenete; defuerunt 'haeretici → defuerunt haeretici; insidiari ] ovili → insidiari ovili; non eum as- 1 sumpsisse → non eum assumpsisse; absur­ dilatem → absur­ ditatem; irraLio­ nalem → irratio­ nalem; in lide catholica → in fide catholica; Fi­ lips → Fi­ lius; me­ mioisse → me­ minisse; sine Doo esse dixerunt I; contra Manich;eos → sine Deo esse dixerunt; contra Manichæos.

Topics: Christology, Heresy

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Tract. Ev. Jo. 47.9 (PL 35:1737; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-tractatus-ioannem/47-1/#p-47-9). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-tractatus-ioannem-47-9) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne PL 35 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin), then compared batch by batch with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 7 (Gibb and Innes, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.

47.10PL 35:1737

Quomodo ergo hic dixit Dominus, Potestatem habeo ponendi animam meam? Quis ponit animam, et iterum sumit eam? Christus ex eo quod Verbum est, ponit animam, et sumit eam iterum? An ex eo quod anima humana est, ipsa se ponit, et iterum ipsa se sumit? An ex eo quod caro est, caro animam ponit, et iterum sumit? Tria proposui, omnia pertractemus, et hoc eligamus quod conveniat regulae veritatis. Si enim dixerimus, quia Verbum Dei posuit animam suam, et iterum sumpsit eam; metuendum est ne sub­ intret prava cogitatio, et dicatur nobis: Ergo aliquando anima illa separata est a Verbo, et aliquando Verbum illud, ex quo suscepit animam illam, fuit sine anima. Video enim fuisse sine anima humana Verbum, sed cum in principio erat Verbum, et Verbum erat apud Deum, et Deus erat Verbum. Ex quo enim Verbum caro factum est, ut habitaret in nobis, et susceptus est a Verbo homo, id est totus homo, anima et caro; quid fecit passio, quid fecit mors, nisi corpus ab anima separavit? Animam vero a Verbo non separavit. Si enim mortuus est Dominus, imo quia mortuus est Dominus; mortuus est enim pro nobis in cruce; sine dubio caro ipsius exspiravit animam: ad tempus exiguum anima deseruit carnem, sed re­ deunte anima resurrecturam. A Verbo autem animam separatam esse non dico. Latronis animae dixit: Hodie mecum eris in paradiso. Fidelem la­ tronis animam non deserebat, et deserebat suam? Absit: sed illius ut Dominus custodivit, suam vero inseparabiliter habuit. Si autem dixerimus quia ipsa se anima posuit, et iterum ipsa se sumpsit, absurdissi­ mus sensus est: non enim quæ a Verbo non erat separata, a seipsa poterat separari.

How, then, did the Lord say here, “I have power to lay down my life”? Who lays down the life and takes it again? Does Christ, in that he is the Word, lay down the soul and take it again? Or, in that he is a human soul, does the soul lay itself down and take itself again? Or, in that he is flesh, does the flesh lay down the soul and take it again? I have proposed three things; let us examine them all, and choose what agrees with the rule of truth. For if we say that the Word of God laid down his soul and took it again, we must fear that a wrong thought may creep in and it be said to us: “Then at some time that soul was separated from the Word, and at some time that Word, from the time he took up that soul, was without a soul.” For I see that the Word was without a human soul, but only when “in the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.” But from the time the Word was made flesh to dwell among us, and man—that is, the whole man, soul and flesh—was taken up by the Word, what did the passion do, what did death do, but separate the body from the soul? It did not separate the soul from the Word. For if the Lord died—indeed, because the Lord died, for he died for us on the cross—without doubt his flesh breathed out its soul; for a short time the soul left the flesh, but the flesh was to rise again when the soul returned. But I do not say that the soul was separated from the Word. To the soul of the thief he said, “Today you will be with me in paradise.” Did he not desert the faithful soul of the thief, and desert his own? Far from it: he kept the thief's as Lord, but his own he held inseparably. But if we say that the soul laid itself down and took itself up again, it is a most absurd sense: for what was not separated from the Word could not be separated from itself.

John 10:18 (quotation, high confidence) · John 1:1 (quotation, high confidence) · John 1:14 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 23:43 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: In Christ's death the soul was separated from the body but never from the Word; so neither the Word nor the soul itself is properly what lays the soul down.

  • John 10:18, John 1:1, 1:14 and Luke 23:43 are quoted.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip): et iurum sumit eam → et iterum sumit eam; ipsa se ponit, ct iterum → ipsa se ponit, et iterum; ne suh­ intret → ne sub­ intret; fuit sine anhna → fuit sine anima; resurfecturam → resurrecturam; se anima posuit, ct itcrum → se anima posuit, et iterum.

Topics: Christology

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Tract. Ev. Jo. 47.10 (PL 35:1737; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-tractatus-ioannem/47-1/#p-47-10). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-tractatus-ioannem-47-10) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne PL 35 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin), then compared batch by batch with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 7 (Gibb and Innes, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.

47.11PL 35:1737–1739

Dicamus ergo et quod verum est, et quod facile intelligi potest. Ecce homo quilibet non constans ex Verbo et anima et carne, sed ex anima et carne: de iSlo homine interrogemus quomodo ponat animam suam quicumque homo. An forte nullus homo ponit animam suam? Potes mihi dicere: Nullus homo ha­ bet potestatem ponere animam suam, et iterum sumere eam. Ponere animam suam nisi posset homo, non diceret Joannes apostolus, Sicut Christus pro nobis animam suam posuit, sic et nos debemus animas pro fratribus ponere. Ergo et nobis licet (si et nos impleamur virtute ipsius, quia sine illo nihil fa­ cere possumus) ponere pro fratribus animas nostras. Quando martyr quilibet sanctus posuit pro fratribus animam suam, quis posuit, et quam posuit? Hoc si intellexerimus, ibi videbimus quemadmodum a Christo dictum sit, Potestatem habeo ponendi animam meam. O homo, paratus es pro Christo mori? Paratus, in­ quit. Dicam hoc aliis verbis. Paratus es pro Christo animam tuam ponere? Et ad ista verba sic mihi re­ spondet, Paratus sum; quomodo mihi responderat cum dicerem, Paratus es mori? Hoc ergo est ponere animam, quod est mori. Sed pro quo ibi est certamen? Omnes enim homines quando moriuntur, ponunt ani­ mam; sed non omnes pro Christo ponunt. Et nemo habet potestatem sumere quod posuerit: Christus au­ tem et pro nobis posuit, et quando voluit, posuit; et quando voluit, sumpsit. Ponere ergo animam, mori est. Sic et apostolus Petrus Domino dixit, Animam meam pro te ponam: id est, pro te moriar. Carni hoc tribue: caro ponit animam suam, et caro iterum sumit eam; non tamen sua potestate caro, sed potestate inhabitantis carnem: caro ergo ponit animam suam exspirando. Vide ipsum Domi­ num in cruce; Sitio dixit: illi qui aderant tinxerunt spongiam in aceto, alligaverunt arundini, et apposue­ runt ori ejus; quod cum accepisset, ait, Perfectum est: quid est, Perfectum est? Impleta sunt omnia quæ ante mortem futura de me fuerant prophetata. Et quia po­ testatem habebat quando vellet ponendi animam suam; posteaquam dixit, Perfectum est, quid ait Evangelista? Et inclinato capite tradidit spiritum. Hoc est ponere animam. Modo hic attendat Charitas vestra. Inclinato capite tradidit spiritum. Quis tradidit? quem tradidit? Spiritum tradidit, caro illum tradidit. Quid est, caro illum tradidit? Caro illum emisit, caro illum exspiravit. Ideo enim dicitur exspirare, extra spiritum fieri. Quomodo est exsulare, extra solum fieri; exorbitare, extra orbitam fieri: sic exspirare, extra spiritum fieri; qui spiritus anima est. Cum ergo exit anima a carne, et remanet caro sine anima, tunc homo ponere animam dicitur. Quando Christus ani­ mam posuit? Quando Verbum voluit. Principatus enim in Verbo erat; ibi potestas erat quando poneret caro animam, et quando sumeret.

Let us say, then, what is both true and easily understood. Take any man, consisting not of Word and soul and flesh, but of soul and flesh: about that man let us ask how any man lays down his soul. Or perhaps no man lays down his soul? You may say to me, “No man has power to lay down his soul and take it again.” If a man could not lay down his soul, the apostle John would not say, “As Christ laid down his soul for us, so we too ought to lay down our souls for the brothers.” So it is permitted to us too—if we are filled with his strength, since without him we can do nothing—to lay down our souls for the brothers. When some holy martyr has laid down his soul for the brothers, who laid it down, and what did he lay down? If we understand this, we shall see in it how Christ said, “I have power to lay down my soul.” O man, are you ready to die for Christ? “Ready,” he says. I will say this in other words: are you ready to lay down your soul for Christ? And to these words he answers me thus: “I am ready,” just as he had answered when I said, “Are you ready to die?” So to lay down the soul is the same as to die. But for whose sake is the contest there? For all men, when they die, lay down the soul; but not all lay it down for Christ. And no one has power to take up what he has laid down; but Christ both laid it down for us, and laid it down when he willed, and took it up when he willed. To lay down the soul, then, is to die. So also the apostle Peter said to the Lord, “I will lay down my soul for you,” that is, I will die for you. Ascribe this to the flesh: the flesh lays down its soul, and the flesh takes it up again—yet not by the flesh's own power, but by the power of him who dwells in the flesh. The flesh, then, lays down its soul by breathing it out. Look at the Lord himself on the cross. He said, “I thirst.” Those who were present dipped a sponge in vinegar, fastened it to a reed, and put it to his mouth; and when he had received it, he said, “It is finished.” What is “It is finished”? All things are fulfilled which had been prophesied of me as to come before my death. And because he had power to lay down his soul when he willed, after he said, “It is finished,” what does the evangelist say? “And bowing his head he gave up the spirit.” This is laying down the soul. Here let your Charity pay attention. “Bowing his head he gave up the spirit.” Who gave it up? What did he give up? He gave up the spirit; the flesh gave it up. What is “the flesh gave it up”? The flesh sent it forth, the flesh breathed it out. For to expire is so called because it is to come to be out of the spirit. As “to be exiled” is to come to be out of one's soil, and “to go off the track” is to come to be out of the track, so “to expire” is to come to be out of the spirit, which spirit is the soul. When, then, the soul goes out of the flesh and the flesh remains without the soul, then a man is said to lay down his soul. When did Christ lay down his soul? When the Word willed. For the sovereignty was in the Word: there lay the power as to when the flesh should lay down the soul and when it should take it up.

John 10:18 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 John 3:16 (quotation, high confidence) · John 15:5 (allusion, high confidence) · John 13:37 (quotation, high confidence) · John 19:28 (quotation, high confidence) · John 19:29 (quotation, high confidence) · John 19:30 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: To lay down the soul is to die; the flesh lays down the soul by breathing it out, and in Christ this happened when the Word willed, by the Word's power.

  • John 10:18, 1 John 3:16, John 15:5, John 13:37, John 19:28–30 are quoted. “Soul” here renders “anima”, which also means “life”. The etymologies (exspirare, exsulare, exorbitare) are Augustine's own word play.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip): Ponere animam suam nisi posset horno → Ponere animam suam nisi posset homo; pro nobia animan suam → pro nobis animam suam; virine ipsius → virtute ipsius; pro fratnbus animas → pro fratribus animas; quam posuit i Hoc → quam posuit? Hoc; ponendi aniriam meam. O homo, paratus cs pro Christo mori? Paratus. in­ quit. Dicam hoc aliis vorbis. Paratus cs pro Christo animam luam ponere? Et ad ista verba sic milii → ponendi animam meam. O homo, paratus es pro Christo mori? Paratus, in­ quit. Dicam hoc aliis verbis. Paratus es pro Christo animam tuam ponere? Et ad ista verba sic mihi; cnm dicercm, Paratus es mori. noc ergo est ponere animam, quod cst mori. Sed pro quo ibi cst certamen → cum dicerem, Paratus es mori? Hoc ergo est ponere animam, quod est mori. Sed pro quo ibi est certamen; Christus au­ tcm ct pro nobis posuit. ct quando → Christus au­ tem et pro nobis posuit, et quando; Ponere ergo animam, mori cst. Sic ct apostolus → Ponere ergo animam, mori est. Sic et apostolus; caro ponit animam suam, ct caro iterum sumit cam → caro ponit animam suam, et caro iterum sumit eam; caro crgo ponit → caro ergo ponit; Vide ipsum Domi­ mun in cruce → Vide ipsum Domi­ num in cruce; quid cst, Perfectum est? Impleta sant omnia quæante → quid est, Perfectum est? Impleta sunt omnia quæ ante; Perfeclum est, quid → Perfectum est, quid; Modo hic allendat Chantas vestra → Modo hic attendat Charitas vestra; extra spiiitum → extra spiritum; in Ycrbo erat → in Verbo erat.

Topics: Christology, Martyrdom

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Tract. Ev. Jo. 47.11 (PL 35:1737–1739; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-tractatus-ioannem/47-1/#p-47-11). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-tractatus-ioannem-47-11) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne PL 35 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin), then compared batch by batch with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 7 (Gibb and Innes, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.

47.12PL 35:1739

Si ergo caro animam posuit, quomodo Chri­ stus animam posuit? Non enim caro Christus? Ita plane, et caro Christus, et anima Christus, et Verbum Christus: nec tamen tria hæc tres Christi, sed unus Christus. Hominem interroga, et de teipso fac gra­ dum ad ea quæ supra te sunt, et si nondum intelli­ genda, saltem credenda. Quomodo est enim unus homo anima et corpus; sic unus Christus Verbum et homo. Videte quid dixerim, et intelligite. Anima et corpus duæ res sunt, sed unus homo: Verbum et homo duæ res sunt, sed unus Christus. Ergo de ho­ mine quære. Ubi est Paulus apostolus modo? Si quis respondeat, In requie cum Christo; verum dicit. Item si quis respondeat, Romæ in sepulcro; et ipse verum dicit. Illud mihi de anima, hoc de ejus carne respon­ det. Nec tamen ideo duos dicimus apostolos Paulos; unum qui requiescit in Christo, alium qui positus est in sepulcro; quamvis apostolum Paulum dicamus vivere in Christo, eumdemque apostolum Paulum di­ camus mortuum jacere in sepulcro. Moritur aliquis, dicimus, Bonus homo, fidelis homo, in pace est cum Domino: et continuo, Eamus ad exsequias ipsius, et sepeliamus illum. Eum sepulturus es quem jam dixe­ ras in pace esse cum Deo: cum aliud sit anima quæ immortaliter viget, aliud corpus quod corruptibiliter jacet. Sed ex quo consortium carnis et animæ homi­ nis nomen accepit, jam et singulum atque separatum, utrumlibet eorum nomen hominis tenuit.

If, then, the flesh laid down the soul, how did Christ lay down the soul? Is not Christ flesh? Yes, plainly: Christ is flesh, and Christ is soul, and Christ is the Word; and yet these three are not three Christs, but one Christ. Question a man, and from yourself take a step to the things that are above you—if not yet to be understood, at least to be believed. For as one man is soul and body, so one Christ is Word and man. See what I have said, and understand. Soul and body are two things, but one man; Word and man are two things, but one Christ. Ask, then, about a man. Where is the apostle Paul now? If someone answers, “At rest with Christ,” he speaks the truth. Again, if someone answers, “At Rome in the tomb,” he too speaks the truth. The one answers me about his soul, the other about his flesh. Yet we do not on that account say there are two apostles Paul, one who rests in Christ, another who is laid in the tomb, although we say that the apostle Paul lives in Christ, and say that the same apostle Paul lies dead in the tomb. Someone dies; we say, “A good man, a believing man, he is at peace with the Lord”; and immediately, “Let us go to his funeral and bury him.” You are going to bury the one whom you had just said was at peace with God: for the soul which lives on immortally is one thing, the body which lies corruptibly is another. But since the union of flesh and soul has received the name “man,” each of them, even singly and separated, has kept the name of man.

Notes and citation

Summary: As soul and body are one man, so Word and man are one Christ; hence what the flesh does can be said of Christ, as one says that Paul both rests with Christ and lies in his tomb.

  • Augustine here argues from the unity of person (one Christ) to the attribution of the flesh's acts to Christ.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; stray marks in the digital text): * i i. Si ergo → Si ergo; et Verburn Christus: nee tamen → et Verbum Christus: nec tamen; et, de teipso fac gra­, dum ad ea qum supra → et de teipso fac gra­ dum ad ea quæ supra; inlelli­ genda → intelli­ genda; Anima et corpus dua res → Anima et corpus duæ res; in sepulro → in sepulcro; mum. qui requiescit in Christo, alium qui positus est in sepulcro! → unum qui requiescit in Christo, alium qui positus est in sepulcro;; cumdemquc → eumdemque; dicinms, Bonus homo, fidelis. homo, in pace est cum Domino: ct continuo, Eamus ad exsequias ipsius, ei sepeliamus illium → dicimus, Bonus homo, fidelis homo, in pace est cum Domino: et continuo, Eamus ad exsequias ipsius, et sepeliamus illum; quem jam dixc­ ras tu pace esse cum Dco → quem jam dixe­ ras in pace esse cum Deo; corrui tibiliter → corruptibiliter; camis ct animuæ → carnis et animæ.

Topics: Christology

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Tract. Ev. Jo. 47.12 (PL 35:1739; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-tractatus-ioannem/47-1/#p-47-12). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-tractatus-ioannem-47-12) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne PL 35 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin), then compared batch by batch with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 7 (Gibb and Innes, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.

47.13PL 35:1739

Nemo ergo titubet, quando audit Dominum dixisse, Pono animam meam, et iterum sumo eam. Ponit eam caro, sed ex potestate Verbi: sumit eam caro, sed ex potestate Verbi. Et ipse Dominus Christus dictus est sola caro. Quomodo, inquit, probas? Audeo dicere, et sola caro Christi dictus est Christus. Cre­ dimus certe non in solum Deum Patrem, sed et in Jesum Christum Filium ejus unicum Dominum no­ strum: modo totum dixi, in Jesum Christum Filium ejus unicum Dominum nostrum. Totum ibi intelligo, et Verbum, et animam, et carnem. Sed utique con­ fiteris etiam illud quod habet eadem fides, in eum Christum te credere qui crucifixus est et sepultus. Ergo etiam sepultum Christum esse non negas: et tamen sola caro sepulta est. Si enim erat ibi anima, non erat mortuus: si autem vera mors erat, ut ejus vera sit resurrectio, sine anima fuerat in sepulcro; et tamen sepultus est Christus. Ergo Christus erat etiam sine anima caro, quia non est sepulta nisi caro. Disce hoc etiam in apostolicis verbis. Hoc sentite, in­ quit, in vobis, quod et in Christo Jesu: qui cum in forma Dei esset, non rapinam arbitratus est esse æqualis Deo. Quis, nisi Christus Jesus, quantum attinet ad id quod est Verbum. Deus apud Deum? Vide autem quod se­ quitur: Sed semetipsum exinanivit formam servi acci­ piens; in similitudine hominum factus, et habitu inventus ut homo. Et hoc quis, nisi idem ipse Christus Jesus? Sed hic jam omnia sunt, et Verbum in forma Dei, quae accepit formam servi; et anima et caro in forma servi, quæ accepta est a forma Dei. Humiliavit semet­ ipsum, factus obediens usque ad mortem. Jam in morte sola caro est a Judæis occisa. Si enim discipulis dixit, Nolite timere eos qui occidunt corpus, animam autem non possunt occidere; numquid in ipso potuerunt plus quam corpus occidere? Et tamen carne occisa Christus occisus est. Ita cum caro animam posuit, Christus animam posuit; et cum caro, ut resurgeret, animam sumpsit, Christus animam sumpsit. Nec tamen potestate carnis hoc factum est; sed ejus qui et animam et carnem, ubi hæc adimplerentur, assumpsit.

So let no one waver when he hears that the Lord said, “I lay down my soul, and I take it again.” The flesh lays it down, but by the power of the Word; the flesh takes it up, but by the power of the Word. Even flesh alone was called the Lord Christ. “How,” he says, “do you prove it?” I dare to say that even the flesh of Christ alone was called Christ. We certainly believe not only in God the Father, but also in Jesus Christ his only Son, our Lord. Just now I spoke of the whole: “in Jesus Christ his only Son, our Lord.” There I understand the whole: the Word, the soul, and the flesh. But surely you also confess what the same faith holds, that you believe in that Christ who was crucified and buried. So you do not deny that Christ was buried; and yet only the flesh was buried. For if the soul had been there, he would not have been dead; but if it was a real death, so that his resurrection might be real, he was in the tomb without a soul; and yet Christ was buried. So the flesh even without the soul was Christ, for only the flesh was buried. Learn this also from the apostle's words. “Have this mind in you,” he says, “which was also in Christ Jesus, who, though he was in the form of God, did not think it robbery to be equal with God.” Who, but Christ Jesus, as regards what he is as the Word, God with God? But see what follows: “But he emptied himself, taking the form of a servant, being made in the likeness of men, and found in appearance as a man.” And who is this, but the same Christ Jesus? But here everything is already included: the Word in the form of God, which took the form of a servant; and soul and flesh in the form of a servant, which was taken by the form of God. “He humbled himself, becoming obedient unto death.” Now in death only the flesh was killed by the Jews. For if he said to the disciples, “Do not fear those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul,” could they do more in his case than kill the body? And yet when the flesh was killed, Christ was killed. So when the flesh laid down the soul, Christ laid down the soul; and when the flesh, in order to rise, took up the soul, Christ took up the soul. Yet this was not done by the power of the flesh, but by the power of him who took up both soul and flesh, in which these things were to be fulfilled.

John 10:17 (quotation, high confidence) · Phil 2:5 (quotation, high confidence) · Phil 2:6 (quotation, high confidence) · Phil 2:7 (quotation, high confidence) · Phil 2:8 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 10:28 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Even Christ's dead flesh in the tomb is called Christ, as the creed confesses; so when the flesh laid down and took up the soul by the Word's power, Christ did so.

  • John 10:17–18, the creed, Phil 2:5–8 and Matt 10:28 are quoted. “Killed by the Jews” is translated as written.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip): sumit cam cam, sed → sumit eam caro, sed; Christus dictus cat sola caro → Christus dictus est sola caro; et sola caro Cbrisli dictus est Cbrislus → et sola caro Christi dictus est Christus; in Jcsum Chritum → in Jesum Christum; modo totuin dixi → modo totum dixi; Sed utiquc con → Sed utique con; illud qnod habet → illud quod habet; Ergo ctinm sepultum Christum esse non nogas → Ergo etiam sepultum Christum esse non negas; Si enim ciat ibi anima, non crat mortuus → Si enim erat ibi anima, non erat mortuus; in sepulero → in sepulcro; Quis, nibi Christus Jesus, quantum atlinet ad id quod cst Verbum → Quis, nisi Christus Jesus, quantum attinet ad id quod est Verbum; formam serv acci → formam servi acci; Et hoc qnis → Et hoc quis; formam servi; ct anima ct caro in forma servi, qua; accepta est a forina Dei → formam servi; et anima et caro in forma servi, quæ accepta est a forma Dei; sola caro cst a Judæis → sola caro est a Judæis; Nolite timere cos qui → Nolite timere eos qui; potucrunt plus → potuerunt plus; anirnam posuit; et cum caro, ut resurgerct → animam posuit; et cum caro, ut resurgeret.

Topics: Christology

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Tract. Ev. Jo. 47.13 (PL 35:1739; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-tractatus-ioannem/47-1/#p-47-13). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-tractatus-ioannem-47-13) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne PL 35 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin), then compared batch by batch with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 7 (Gibb and Innes, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.

47.14PL 35:1739–1741

Hoc, inquit, mandatum accepi a Patre meo. Ver­ bum non verbo accepit mandatum, sed in Verbo unigenito Patris est omne mandatum. Cum autem di­ citur Filius a Patre accipere quod substantialiter ha­ bet, quomodo dictum est, Sicut habet Pater vitam in semetipso, sic dedit Filio habere vitam in semetipso, cum Filius ipse sit vita; non potestas minuitur, sed generatio ejus ostenditur. Quoniam Pa­ ter non quasi ei filio qui imperfectus est natus, ali­ quid addidit; sed ei quem perfectum genuit, omnia gignendo dedit. Ita illi dedit suam æqualitatem, quem non genuit inaequalem. Sed haec loquente Domino, quoniam lux lucebat in tenebris, et tenebræ eam non comprehendebant, Dissensio iterum facta est inter Judæos propter sermones hos, Dicebant autem multi ex ipsis: Dæmonium habet, et insanit; quid eum auditis? Istæ fuerunt densissimæ tenebræ. Alii dicebant: Hæc verba non sunt dæmonium habentis; numquid dæmonium potest cæcorum oculos aperire? Jam istorum oculi coe­ perant aperiri.

“This commandment,” he says, “I received from my Father.” The Word did not receive a commandment by a word, but in the only-begotten Word of the Father is every commandment. And when the Son is said to receive from the Father what he has substantially—as it was said, “As the Father has life in himself, so he has given to the Son to have life in himself,” though the Son is himself the life—his power is not lessened, but his generation is shown. For the Father did not add something to a Son born imperfect, but by begetting gave everything to the Son whom he begot perfect. So he gave his equality to him whom he did not beget unequal. But as the Lord said these things, since the light was shining in the darkness and the darkness did not comprehend it, “there was a division again among the Jews because of these words. Many of them said, He has a demon and is mad; why do you listen to him?” This was the thickest darkness. “Others said, These are not the words of one who has a demon; can a demon open the eyes of the blind?” The eyes of these were already beginning to be opened.

John 10:18 (quotation, high confidence) · John 5:26 (quotation, high confidence) · John 1:5 (allusion, high confidence) · John 10:19 (quotation, high confidence) · John 10:20 (quotation, high confidence) · John 10:21 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The Son's receiving a commandment from the Father shows his generation, not inferiority; the Jews were divided over his words.

  • John 10:18, John 5:26, John 1:5 and John 10:19–21 are quoted.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip): bum non verbo I accepit → bum non verbo accepit; substantialilcr → substantialiter; sed gencralio ejus → sed generatio ejus; Quoniam 'Pa­ ter → Quoniam Pa­ ter; omnia,. gignendo → omnia gignendo; lux lucchal in tenebris, et tenebra cam non → lux lucebat in tenebris, et tenebræ eam non; Dæmonium habel → Dæmonium habet; dæmoniumhabentis → dæmonium habentis; eae­ perant aperiri → coe­ perant aperiri.

Topics: Trinity, Christology

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Tract. Ev. Jo. 47.14 (PL 35:1739–1741; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-tractatus-ioannem/47-1/#p-47-14). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-tractatus-ioannem-47-14) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne PL 35 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin), then compared batch by batch with the public-domain English of NPNF¹ 7 (Gibb and Innes, 1888); differences checked against the Latin.