Sermons to the People 253.1–254.8

Latin text: PL 38 (Latin text: Migne, PL 38, digitized by Open Greek and Latin (patrologia_latina-dev, University of Leipzig), CC BY-SA 4.0).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0). Compare: NPNF 1/6: Sermons on Selected Lessons of the New Testament (R. G. MacMullen, ed., 1888).

Show

Chapter 253

253.1PL 38:1137

Evangelium sancti Joannis apostoli, quod dicitur secundum Joannem, hodie terminatum est, de his quæ narravit quomodo apparuerit Dominus post resurrectionem discipulis suis. Compellavit ergo apostolum Petrum, illum praesumptorem ct negatorem, cum loqueretur ei jam vivus morte devicta, et dicebat: Simon Joannis (sic enim appellabatur Petrus), amas me Respondebat ille quod ciat in corde ipsius. Si Petrus respondebat quod in corde habcbat; Dominus quare quærebat, qni cor vidcbat? Denique ipse etiam Petrus mirabatur, et cmn quodam tædio audiebat quærentem, quem nover:: scientem. Semel dictum est: Amas me? Responsum est: Diligo te, Domine, tu scis. Et herum: Amas me? Domine, tu omnia nosti; tu scis quia diligo te. Et tertio, Amas me? Contristatus est Petrus. Quid contristaris, Petre, quia ter respondes amorem? Oblitus es trinum timorem? Sine interroget te Dominus: medicus est qui te interrogat, ad sanitatem pertinet quod interrogat. Noli txdio affici. Exspecta, impleatur numerus dilectionis, ut deleat numerum negationis.

The Gospel of Saint John the apostle, which is called “according to John,” was finished today, in what it tells of how the Lord appeared to his disciples after the resurrection. He addressed the apostle Peter, that presumer and denier, when he spoke to him now alive, death overcome, and said: “Simon son of John” (for so Peter was called), “do you love me?” He answered what was in his heart. If Peter answered what he had in his heart, why did the Lord ask, who saw the heart? Finally Peter himself too wondered, and with a certain weariness heard him asking whom he knew to be knowing. Once it was said: “Do you love me?” The answer was: “I love you, Lord; you know.” And again: “Do you love me?” “Lord, you know all things; you know that I love you.” And a third time, “Do you love me?” Peter was grieved. Why are you grieved, Peter, that you answer love three times? Have you forgotten your threefold fear? Let the Lord question you: it is a physician who questions you; what he asks belongs to your health. Do not be wearied. Wait, let the number of love be filled up, so that it may blot out the number of denial.

John 21:15 (quotation, high confidence) · John 21:16 (quotation, high confidence) · John 21:17 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 26:75 (allusion, medium confidence) · John 18:27 (allusion, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Christ asks Peter three times whether he loves him, so that a threefold confession of love may blot out his threefold denial.

  • Quotations and allusions: John 21:15–17; John 18:17, 25–27 (Matt 26:69–75). Augustine’s amas and diligo are both rendered “love”.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (stray mark in the text): discipulis suis t. → discipulis suis..

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 253.1 (PL 38:1137; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/augustine-sermones/253-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-253-1) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).

253.2PL 38:1137

Ubique tamen, ubique, id est, in ipso ternario numero interrogationis suæ Dominus Jesus respondenti amorem commendat agnos suos, et dicit Pasce agnos meos, pasce oves meas: tanquam diceret, Quid milii retribuis, quia diligis me? Dilectionem tuam ostende in ovibus meis. Quid mihi præstas, quia diligis mc; quando ego tibi præstiti, ut diligeres me? Sed dilectionem tuam erga me, habes ubi Obtendas, habes ubi Merceas: pasce agnos meos. Qualiter autem essent pascendi agni dominici, oves tanto pretio comparatae quanta essent dilectione pascendae, in consequentibus demonstravit. Postquam enim Petrus impleto legitimo numero trinæ responsionis professus est se esse Domini dilectorem, commendatis sibi ovibus ejus, audit de sua futura passione. Hic demonstravit Dominus, sic diiigendas oves suas ab eis quibus eas commendat, ut parati sint mori pro eis. Sic idem Joannes in Epistola sua ait: Sicut pro nobis Christus animam suam posuit, sic et noa debemus pro fratribus animas ponere.

Yet everywhere, everywhere, that is, in the very threefold number of his questioning, the Lord Jesus entrusts his lambs to the one who answers with love, and says, “Feed my lambs, feed my sheep,” as if he were saying: What do you repay me, since you love me? Show your love in my sheep. What do you give me by loving me, when it was I who gave you to love me? But you have where to show your love toward me, you have where to exercise it: feed my lambs. How the Lord’s lambs were to be fed, sheep bought at so great a price, with how great love they were to be fed, he showed in what follows. For after Peter, the lawful number of a threefold answer being filled, professed himself a lover of the Lord, and his sheep had been entrusted to him, he hears of his future passion. Here the Lord showed that his sheep are to be loved by those to whom he entrusts them in such a way that they are ready to die for them. So the same John says in his Letter: “As Christ laid down his life for us, so we too ought to lay down our lives for the brothers.”

John 21:15 (quotation, high confidence) · John 21:16 (quotation, high confidence) · John 21:17 (quotation, high confidence) · John 21:18 (allusion, high confidence) · John 21:19 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Pet 1:19 (echo, medium confidence) · 1 John 3:16 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Christ entrusts his sheep to Peter as the proof of his love and foretells Peter’s passion, showing that shepherds must be ready to die for the flock.

  • Quotations and allusions: John 21:15–19; 1 Pet 1:18–19; 1 John 3:16.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (word divided and misread by OCR): Domnini di- Icctorem → Domini dilectorem.

Topics: Church office, Martyrdom

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 253.2 (PL 38:1137; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/augustine-sermones/253-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-253-2) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).

253.3PL 38:1137–1138

Responderat ergo Domino Petrus per superbam quamdam praesumptionem, quando ei dixerat, Animam meam pro te ponam. Nondum acceperat vires, quibus impleret promissum. Modo jam ut possit hoc facere, impletur charitate. Ideo ei dicitur, Amas me? Et respondet, Amo: quia hoc non implet nisi charitas. Quid est ergo, Petre? quando negasti, quid timuisti? Totum quod timuisti, hoc crat, mori. Vivus tecum loquitur, quem mortuum vidisti: noli jam timere mortem; in illo victa est, quam timebas. Pependit in cruce, confixus est clavis, spirilum reddidit, lancea percussus est, in scpulcro positus. Hoc timuisti, quando negasti; ne hoc patereris, timuisti; et mortem timendo, vitam negasti. Modo intellige: quando timuisti mori, tunc es mortuus. Mortuus est enim negando: sed resurrexit plorando. Quid deinde ait illi? Sequere mE: sciens ejus maturitatem. Si enim meministis, imo quia meminerunt qui legerunt; commemorentur etiam qui non meminerunt, aut cognoscant qui non legerunt. Dixerat Petrus: Sequar te quocumque ieris. Et Dominus ad illum: Non potes me sequi modo: sequeris autem postea. Modo, inquit, non potes: promittis, sed ego video vires luas. Ego venam cordis inspicio, et quod vcrum est aegroto renuntio. Non potes nie sequi modo. Sed ista medici renuntiatio, non est desperatio: adjunxit, et ait, Sequeris autem postea. Eris sanus, et sequeris me. Jam quia videt quid agatur in corde ipsius, et videt quod donum dederit dilectionis animæ ipsius, dicit ei: Sequere me. Ego certe dixeram, Non potes modo: ego modo dico, Sequere me.

Peter, then, had answered the Lord out of a certain proud presumption when he had said to him, “I will lay down my life for you.” He had not yet received the strength to fulfill his promise. Now, so that he can do it, he is filled with charity. That is why it is said to him, “Do you love me?” And he answers, “I love you,” because only charity fulfills this. What then, Peter? When you denied, what did you fear? All that you feared was this: to die. He whom you saw dead is speaking with you alive: do not fear death any more; in him the death you feared was overcome. He hung on the cross, he was fixed with nails, he gave up the spirit, he was struck with a lance, he was laid in the tomb. This is what you feared when you denied; you feared to suffer this; and by fearing death you denied life. Understand now: when you feared to die, then you died. For he died by denying, but he rose by weeping. What does he then say to him? “Follow me,” knowing his ripeness. For if you remember, or rather since those who have read it remember, let those who do not remember be reminded, or those who have not read it learn. Peter had said: “I will follow you wherever you go.” And the Lord to him: “You cannot follow me now; but you will follow afterward.” “Now,” he says, “you cannot: you promise, but I see your strength. I examine the pulse of the heart, and I tell the sick man what is true. You cannot follow me now.” But this report of the physician is not despair: he added, and said, “But you will follow afterward.” You will be well, and you will follow me. Now, since he sees what is happening in his heart, and sees what gift of love he has given to his soul, he says to him: “Follow me.” I certainly said, “You cannot now”; now I say, “Follow me.”

John 13:37 (quotation, high confidence) · John 21:15 (allusion, high confidence) · John 21:19 (quotation, high confidence) · John 19:34 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 22:62 (allusion, high confidence) · John 13:36 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 8:19 (echo, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Peter’s presumption failed because he lacked charity; having denied life by fearing death, he rose by weeping, and the risen Lord, who had said “You cannot follow me now,” now says “Follow me.”

  • Quotations and allusions: John 13:37; John 21:15–19; John 19:30, 34; Luke 22:62; John 13:36 (combined with Matt 8:19).

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (footnote mark in the text): victa est1, → victa est,.

Topics: Martyrdom, Rome and Peter, Love of God and neighbour

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 253.3 (PL 38:1137–1138; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/augustine-sermones/253-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-253-3) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).

253.4PL 38:1138

Sed nata est quædam quæstio non omittenda. Cum dixisset Dominus Petro, Sequere me: respexit Petrus ad discipulum quem diligebat Jesus, id est, ad ipsum Joannem, qui Evangelium hoc scripsit; et ait Domino, Domine, iste quid? Scio quia diligis eum, quomodo ego sequor, et ipse non sequitur? Ait Dominus: Sic eum volo manere, donec veniam: tu me sequere. Ipse vero Evangelista, ipse qui scripsit, de quo dictum est hoc, Sic eum volo mancre, donec veniam; secutus adjunxit verba sua in Evangelio, et ait, natam fuisse famam inter fratreS propter hoc verbum, quia discipulus ille non esset moriturus. Et ut tollerct istam opinioncm adjunxit: Non autem dixit, eum non fuisse moriturum: sed tantum dixit, Sic eum volo manere, donec veniam: tu me sequere. Hanc ergo opinionem, qua putabatur Joannes non moriturus, abstulit Joannes ipse consequentibus verbis suis, et ne boc credatur, ait: Non hoc dixit Dominus, sed dixit hoc. Quare illud autem dixerit, Joannes non exposuit, sed nobis reliquit propter quod pulsemus, si forte aperiatur nobis.

But a certain question has arisen which must not be passed over. When the Lord had said to Peter, “Follow me,” Peter looked back at the disciple whom Jesus loved, that is, at John himself, who wrote this Gospel, and said to the Lord: “Lord, what about him? I know that you love him: how is it that I follow, and he does not?” The Lord said: “So I want him to remain until I come: you follow me.” The evangelist himself, the very one who wrote it, about whom this was said, “So I want him to remain until I come,” added his own words in the Gospel and said that a report had arisen among the brothers because of this word, that that disciple was not going to die. And to remove this opinion he added: “But he did not say that he would not die, but only said, So I want him to remain until I come: you follow me.” This opinion, then, by which John was thought not to be going to die, John himself removed by his following words, and so that it should not be believed, he says: “The Lord did not say this, but he said this.” But why he said that, John did not explain; he left it for us to knock at, in case it is opened to us.

John 21:20 (quotation, high confidence) · John 21:21 (quotation, high confidence) · John 21:22 (quotation, high confidence) · John 21:23 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 7:7 (echo, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: John himself corrected the rumor that he would not die; why Christ said “I want him to remain until I come” he left for readers to inquire.

  • Quotations: John 21:20–23 (Augustine’s Latin, like the Vulgate, reads sic, “so,” for si, “if”). Allusion: Matt 7:7.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (Migne's marginal heading left in the text): Quæstio de verbis Domini, quomodo velit manere Joannem donec veniat. Sed nata → Sed nata.

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 253.4 (PL 38:1138; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/augustine-sermones/253-4). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-253-4) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).

253.5PL 38:1138

Quantum mihi Dominus donare dignatur, quantum mihi videtur (videtur autem et melius melioribus). sic puto istam solvi quæstionem duobus modis: aut de passione Petri dixit Dominus, quod dixit; aut de Evangelio Joannis. Quod est de passione: ut sit, Sequere me, patere pro me, patere quod ego. Crucifixus est enim Christus, crucifixus est et Petrus. Expertus est clavos, expertus est cruciatus. Joannes autem nihil eorum expertus est: hoc est, Sic eum volo manere, sine vulnere, sine cruciatu dormiat, et exspectet me. Tu me sequere, palere quod ego: sanguinem fudi pro te, funde pro me. Uno ergo isto modo exponi potest, quod dictum est, Sic eum volo manere, donec veniam: tu me sequere: Nolo ut ipse patiatur, tu patere. Secundum autem Evangelium Joannis, hoc mihi videtur intelligi: quoniam Petrus scripsit de Domino, scripserunt et alii; sed scriptura eorum magis circa humanitatem Domim est occupata. Dominus enim Christus et Deus est, et homo. Quid est homo? Anima ct caro. Quid est ergo Christus? Verbum, anima et caro. Sed qualis anima? quia ct pecora habent anirnas. Verbum, rationalis anima et caro; hoc totum Chriblus. Sed de divinitate Christi in litteris Petri aliquid: in Evangelio autem Joannis multum eminet. In principio erat Verbum, ipse dixit. Transcendit nubes, et transcendit sidera, transcendit Angelos, transcendit omnem creaturam, pervenit ad Verbum, per quod facta sunt omnia. « In principio erat Verbum, et Verbum erat apud Deum, et Deus erat Verbum: hoc erat in principio apud Deum. Omnia per ipsum facta sunt ». Quis videt, quis cogitat, quis digne suscipiat, quis digne pronuntiet? Tunc habet bene intelligi, quando venerit Christus. Sic eum volo manere, donec veniam. Exposui sicut potui: potest ipse melius in cordibus vestris.

As far as the Lord deigns to grant me, as far as it seems to me (and better men see it better), I think this question can be solved in two ways: the Lord said what he said either about Peter’s passion or about John’s Gospel. As for the passion, it would mean: “Follow me, suffer for me, suffer what I suffer.” For Christ was crucified, and Peter too was crucified. He experienced the nails, he experienced tortures. But John experienced none of them. That is, “So I want him to remain: let him sleep without a wound, without torture, and wait for me. You follow me, suffer what I suffer: I shed my blood for you, shed yours for me.” In this one way, then, what was said can be explained: “So I want him to remain until I come: you follow me”; I do not want him to suffer, you suffer. But according to John’s Gospel, it seems to me to be understood thus: Peter wrote about the Lord, and others wrote too; but their writing is occupied more with the Lord’s humanity. For the Lord Christ is both God and man. What is man? Soul and flesh. What then is Christ? Word, soul, and flesh. But what kind of soul? For cattle too have souls. Word, rational soul, and flesh: this whole is Christ. But about the divinity of Christ there is something in the letters of Peter; in John’s Gospel, though, it stands out greatly. “In the beginning was the Word,” he said. He went beyond the clouds, and went beyond the stars, went beyond the angels, went beyond every creature, and reached the Word, through whom all things were made. “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things were made through him.” Who sees this, who thinks it, who receives it worthily, who utters it worthily? It will be well understood when Christ comes. “So I want him to remain until I come.” I have explained it as I could: he can do it better in your hearts.

John 21:22 (quotation, high confidence) · John 21:18 (allusion, medium confidence) · John 1:1 (quotation, high confidence) · John 1:2 (quotation, high confidence) · John 1:3 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: “I want him to remain” may mean either that John would not be martyred as Peter was, or that John’s Gospel of the divine Word will be fully understood only when Christ comes.

  • Quotations: John 21:22; John 1:1–3. Christ as “Word, rational soul, and flesh”: Christological passage translated as written. Peter’s crucifixion is traditional (cf. John 21:18–19).

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (Migne's marginal heading left in the text; footnote mark in the text): Primo de passione non a Joanne subeunda, secundo de Joannis Evangelio non bene intelligendo nisi in futura felicitate. Quantum → Quantum; aliquid I: → aliquid:.

Topics: Christology, Martyrdom, Scripture and canon

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 253.5 (PL 38:1138; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/augustine-sermones/253-5). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-253-5) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).

Chapter 254

254.1PL 38:1138

Sic se habet, fratres mei, sic se habet miseria nostræ conditionis et Dei miseratio, ut tempus mœstitiæ tempus lætitiæ praecedat: id est, ut prius sit tempus moestitiæ, posterius tempus lætitiæ: prius sit tempus laboris, posterius quietis; prius sit tempus calamitatis, posterius felicitatis. Sic se habet miseria nostrae conditionis, ut diximus, et divina miseratio. Tempus enim moestitia;, laboris, miseriæ, peccata nostra nobis pepererunt: tempus vero laetitiae, quietis, felicitatis, non venit de meritis nostris, sed de gratia Salvatoris. Aliud meremur, aliud speramus: meremur mala, speramus bona. Hoc facit misericordia ejus, qui creavit nos.

So it stands, my brothers, so stands the misery of our condition and the mercy of God, that the time of sadness goes before the time of gladness: that is, that first comes the time of sadness, afterward the time of gladness; first the time of labor, afterward of rest; first the time of calamity, afterward of happiness. So stands the misery of our condition, as we have said, and the divine mercy. For the time of sadness, labor, and misery our sins have brought forth for us; but the time of gladness, rest, and happiness does not come from our merits but from the grace of the Savior. We deserve one thing, we hope for another: we deserve evils, we hope for good things. This is the work of the mercy of him who created us.

Notes and citation

Summary: Sadness, which our sins earned, comes before gladness, which comes not from our merits but from the Savior’s grace.

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 254.1 (PL 38:1138; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/augustine-sermones/254-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-254-1) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).

254.2PL 38:1138–1139

Sed tempore miseriæ nostrae, et, sicut Scriptura loquitur, diebus nativitatis nostra, nosse debemus unde debeat esse ipsa tristitia. Tristitia enim sic est, quomodo stercus. Stercus non loco suo positum, irnmunditia est. Stercus non loco suo positum, immundam facit domum: loco suo positum, fertilem facit agrum. Videte 8tercoris locum ab agricola provisum. Ait Apostolus: « Et quis cst qui me lætificet, nisi qui contristatur ex mc »? Et alio loco: « Tristitia, » inquit, « secundum Deum poenitentiam in salutem impœnitendam operatur ». Qui secundum Dcuin tristis est, in poenitentiam tristis est de peccatis suis. Tristitia de iniquitate propriam justitiam parturit. Prius tibi displiceat quod es, ut possis esse quod non es. « Qua; secundum Deum est, i inquit, « tristitia, pœnitentiam in salutem impoenitendam operatur. Pœnitentiam, > inquit, « in salutem. > Qualem salutem? « Impœnitendam. > Quid est, « Impœnitendam? > Cujus te omnino poenitere non possit. Habuimus enim vitam cujus nos debuimus poeniterc: habui mus vitam poenitendam.Sed non possumus pervenire ad vitiai impœnitendam, nisi per malæ vitæ pœnitentiam. Numquid, fratres, ut dicere cœperam, in massa tritici purgata invenies stercus? Tamen ad illum nitorem, ad illam speciem et pulchritudinem per stercus pervenitur: rei pulchræ foeditas via fuit.

But in the time of our misery, and, as Scripture says, in the days of our birth, we ought to know where sadness itself should come from. For sadness is like dung. Dung put where it does not belong is filth. Dung put where it does not belong makes a house unclean; put in its place, it makes a field fertile. See the place for dung provided by the farmer. The Apostle says: “And who is there to gladden me, but the one who is saddened by me?” And in another place: “Sadness according to God,” he says, “works repentance unto salvation not to be repented of.” Whoever is sad according to God is sad over his sins unto repentance. Sadness over iniquity gives birth to one’s own righteousness. First let what you are displease you, so that you can be what you are not. “Sadness,” he says, “that is according to God works repentance unto salvation not to be repented of.” “Repentance,” he says, “unto salvation.” What salvation? “Not to be repented of.” What is “not to be repented of”? One which you can never repent of at all. For we have had a life we ought to have repented of: we have had a life to be repented of. But we cannot come to a life not to be repented of except through repentance of a bad life. Brothers, as I had begun to say, will you find dung in a cleaned heap of wheat? Yet to that brightness, to that appearance and beauty, one comes through dung: the filthiness was the way to the beautiful thing.

2 Cor 2:2 (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Cor 7:10 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Sadness is like dung, filth in the house but fertilizer in the field; sadness over sin, as Paul says, works repentance unto a salvation that will never be repented of.

  • Quotations: 2 Cor 2:2; 2 Cor 7:10. “The days of our birth” is unidentified (perhaps a reminiscence of Eccl 7:1 or Sir 40:1). Paenitentia is rendered “repentance,” keeping Augustine’s play on impaenitendam (“not to be repented of”).

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (Migne's marginal heading left in the text): Pænitentia impoenitenda. Sed tempore → Sed tempore.

Topics: Repentance

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 254.2 (PL 38:1138–1139; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/augustine-sermones/254-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-254-2) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).

254.3PL 38:1139

Merito etiam Dominus dicit in Evangelio de quadam arbore infructuosa: Jam ecce triennium est quod venio ad eam, et fructum in ea non invenio: præcidam illam, ne mihi agrum impediat. Intercedit colonus: intercedit jam securi imminente infructuosis r.ulicibus, et pene feriente; intercedit colonus, quomodo intercessit Deo Moyses; intercedit colonus, et dicit: Domine, dimitte illam et hoc anno; circumfodio ei, et adhibeo cophinum stercoris: si fecerit fructum, bene; si quo minus, prcecides eam. Arbor ista genus est humanum. Visitavit istam arborcin Dominus tempore Patriarcharum, quasi primo anno. Visitavit eam tempore Legis et Prophetarum, quasi sccundo anno. Ecce in Evangelio tertius annus illuxit. Jam quasi praecidi dcbuit: sed interpellat Inis ericors misericordem. Qui enim se volebat exhibere misericordem, ipse sibi opposuit intercessorem. Dimittatur, inquit, ct hoc anno: circumfodiatur ei fussa; signum est humilitatis: adhibeatur cophinus stercoris, si forte det fructum. Imo quia dat fructum, ex parte non dal fructum, veniet Dominus ejus, et dividet eam ( Luc. XII, 46). Quid est, dividct? Quia sunt boni, et sunt mali: modo autem in uno cœtu, tanquam in uno corpore sunt constituti.

Rightly too the Lord says in the Gospel about a certain unfruitful tree: “See, it is now three years that I come to it, and I find no fruit on it: I will cut it down, so that it does not encumber my field.” The farmer intercedes: he intercedes when the axe is already hanging over the unfruitful roots and almost striking; the farmer intercedes, as Moses interceded with God; the farmer intercedes and says: “Lord, leave it this year too; I will dig around it and apply a basket of dung: if it bears fruit, good; if not, you will cut it down.” This tree is the human race. The Lord visited this tree in the time of the patriarchs, as in the first year. He visited it in the time of the Law and the Prophets, as in the second year. See, in the Gospel the third year has dawned. Now it ought, as it were, to have been cut down; but the merciful one pleads with the merciful. For he who wished to show himself merciful set up an intercessor against himself. “Let it be left,” he says, “this year too; let a trench be dug around it”: it is a sign of humility; “let a basket of dung be applied, in case it gives fruit.” Indeed, because it gives fruit in part and in part does not give fruit, its Lord will come and divide it. What is “divide it”? Because there are good and there are bad; but now they are set in one assembly, as in one body.

Luke 13:7 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 13:8 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 13:9 (quotation, high confidence) · Exod 32:11 (allusion, medium confidence) · Luke 12:46 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 3:10 (echo, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The fig tree spared for a third year with dung is the human race visited in the patriarchs, the Law, and now the Gospel; the dung is humility and repentance, and at his coming the Lord will divide good from bad.

  • Quotations and allusions: Luke 13:6–9; Exod 32:11–14; Luke 12:46 (“he will divide him”).

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 254.3 (PL 38:1139; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/augustine-sermones/254-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-254-3) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).

254.4PL 38:1139

Ergo, fratres mei, ut dixi, stercoris locus opportunus dat fructum, importunus autem locum facit immundum. Nescio quis tristis est, inveni nescio quem tristem: stercus video, locum quaero; dic, amice, unde tristis es? Perdidi, inquit, pecuniam. Locus immundus, fructus nullus. Audiat Apostolum: Tristitia mundi mortem operatur. Non solum fructus nullus, sed et magna pernicies. Sic et de cæteris rebus ad gaudia sæcularia pertinentibus, quas res longum est enumerare. Video alium tristantem, gementem, flentem: multum stercoris video, et ibi lucum quæro. Et cum viderem tristem, flentem; inspexi et orantem. Orans nescio quid mibi bonæ significationis ingessit: sed adhuc lucum quæro. Quid enim si iste orans, gemens, magno fletu mortem roget inimici sui? Etiamsi sic jam plorat, jam rogat, jam orat; locus immundus, frucius nullus. Plus est quod invenimus in Scripturis: regat ut moriatur inimicus ipsius, incidit in malcdictionem Judæ: Oratio ejus fiat in peccatum. Inspexi alium rursus gementem, Oentem, orantem: stercus agnosco, locum quæro. Intendi autcm orationi ejus, et audio dicentem, Ego dixi: Domine, miserere mei; sana animam meam, quoniam peccavi tibi. Gemit peccatum: agnosco agrum, exspecto fructum. Deo gratias: bono loco est stercus; non ibi vacat; fructum parturit. Huc cst vere tempus fructuosæ mœstitiæ, ut conditionem mortalitatis nostræ, abundantiam tentationum, subreptiones peccatorum, adversitates cupiditatum, rixas concupiscentiarum contra bonas cogitationes semper tumultuantium doleamus: hinc tristes simus.

So, my brothers, as I said, dung in a suitable place gives fruit, but in an unsuitable place makes the place unclean. Someone or other is sad; I found someone or other sad: I see dung, I look for the place. Tell me, friend, why are you sad? “I have lost money,” he says. Unclean place, no fruit. Let him hear the Apostle: “The sadness of the world works death.” Not only no fruit, but great ruin too. So also with the other things that belong to worldly joys, which it would take long to list. I see another saddened, groaning, weeping: I see a lot of dung, and there I look for the place. And when I saw him sad and weeping, I looked more closely and saw him praying too. Praying, he gave me some sign of something good; but I still look for the place. For what if this man, praying, groaning, with great weeping, is asking for the death of his enemy? Even if he is already lamenting this way, already asking, already praying: unclean place, no fruit. What we find in the Scriptures is more: if he asks that his enemy die, he falls into the curse of Judas: “Let his prayer become sin.” I looked again at another, groaning, weeping, praying: I recognize dung, I look for the place. I paid attention to his prayer and I hear him saying: “I said: Lord, have mercy on me; heal my soul, for I have sinned against you.” He is groaning over sin: I recognize the field, I wait for the fruit. Thanks be to God: the dung is in a good place; it is not idle there; it brings forth fruit. This truly is the time of fruitful sadness: that we should grieve over the condition of our mortality, the abundance of temptations, the stealthy approaches of sins, the oppositions of desires, the quarrels of the lusts always in tumult against good thoughts: let us be sad over this.

2 Cor 7:10 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 109:7 (108:7 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · Acts 1:20 (allusion, medium confidence) · Ps 41:4 (40:5 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Sadness over lost money or prayer for an enemy’s death is dung in the wrong place; sadness over sin and mortal temptation is fruitful.

  • Quotations: 2 Cor 7:10; Ps 109:7 (108:7 Vulg.), a psalm applied to Judas (Acts 1:20); Ps 41:4 (40:5 Vulg.).

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (Migne's marginal headings left in the text): Tristitia de sæculi rebus perniciosa. Quæ hic lugenda. Ergo → Ergo.

Topics: Prayer, Repentance, Love of enemies and forgiveness of wrongs

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 254.4 (PL 38:1139; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/augustine-sermones/254-4). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-254-4) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).

254.5PL 38:1139

HoC tempus miseriae nostræ et gemitus nostri, quadraginta dies illi significant ante Pascha: lætitiae vero, quae posterior erit, quietis, felicitatis, vitæ æternæ, regni sine fine, quod nondum est, his diebus quinquaginta, quibus diebus Deo laudes dicuntur, significatur. Significantur enim nobis duo tempora: unn:n ante resurrectionem Domini; alterum post resurrectionem Domini; unum in quo sumus, alterum in quo nos futuros esse speramus. Tempus moeroris, quod significant dies Quadragesiimc, et significamus et habemus: tempus autem lætitiæ et quietis et regni, quod significant dies isti, significamus per Alleluia, sed nondum habemus laudes. Sed nunc suspiramusad Alleluia. Quid est, Alleluia? Laudate Deum. Sed nondum habemus laudes: in Ecclesia frequentantur laudes Dei post resurrectionem, quia nobis crit perpetua laus post resurrectionem nostram. Domini passio tempus nostrum significat, in quo nunc flemus. Flagella, vincula, contumeliae, sputa, spinea corona, vinum fellitum, in spongia acetum, insultationes, opprobria, postremo ipsa crux, in ligno membra sacra pendentia, quid nobis significant, nisi lempus quod agimus, tempus moeroris, tempus mortalitatis, tempus tentationis? Ideo foedum tempus: sed foeditas ista stercoris sit in agro, non in domo. Moeror sit de peccatis, non de cupiditatibus fraudatis. Foedum tempus: sed si bene utamur, fidele tempus. Quid foetidius agro stercorato. Pulchrior fuit ager, antequam cophinum stercoris haberet; perductus est ager ad faeditatem, ut veniret ad ubertatem. Ergo foeditas hujus temporis signum est: sed nobis sit ista foeditas tempus fertilitatis. Yidcamus ergo cum propheta, quid dicat, Vidimus eum, Qualem? Non habentem speciem neque decorem (Isai. LUI, 2). Quare? Alium prophetam interroga: Dinumeraverunt omnia ossa mea. Dinumerata suni ossa pendentis. Foeda species, crucifixi species: sed ista fœditas pulchritudinem parturiL Quam pulchritudinem? Resurrectionis. Quia speciosus forma præ filiis hominum.

This time of our misery and our groaning is signified by those forty days before Easter; but the time of gladness which will come later, of rest, happiness, eternal life, the kingdom without end, which does not yet exist, is signified by these fifty days, on which praises are said to God. For two times are signified to us: one before the Lord’s resurrection, the other after the Lord’s resurrection; one in which we are, the other in which we hope we shall be. The time of mourning, which the days of Lent signify, we both signify and have; but the time of gladness and rest and the kingdom, which these days signify, we signify by Alleluia, but we do not yet have the praises. But now we sigh toward Alleluia. What is Alleluia? Praise God. But we do not yet have the praises: in the Church God’s praises are repeated often after the resurrection, because we shall have perpetual praise after our resurrection. The Lord’s passion signifies our time, in which we now weep. The scourges, chains, insults, spittle, crown of thorns, wine mixed with gall, vinegar on a sponge, mockeries, reproaches, and finally the cross itself, the sacred members hanging on the wood: what do they signify to us but the time we are passing, the time of mourning, the time of mortality, the time of temptation? So it is a foul time; but let this foulness be the foulness of dung in the field, not in the house. Let the mourning be over sins, not over cheated desires. A foul time; but if we use it well, a faithful time. What smells worse than a manured field? The field was more beautiful before it had the basket of dung; the field was brought to foulness so that it might come to abundance. So the foulness of this time is a sign; but let this foulness be for us a time of fertility. Let us see, then, with the prophet what he says: “We saw him.” What was he like? “Having no form or comeliness.” Why? Ask another prophet: “They have numbered all my bones.” The bones of the one hanging were numbered. A foul appearance, the appearance of one crucified; but this foulness gives birth to beauty. What beauty? That of the resurrection. For he is “fairer in form than the sons of men.”

Matt 27:26 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 27:29 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 27:34 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 27:48 (allusion, high confidence) · Isa 53:2 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 22:17 (21:18 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 45:2 (44:3 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Lent signifies the present time of mourning, the Easter season the praise to come; the passion’s foulness, like dung in a field, gave birth to the beauty of the resurrection.

  • Quotations and allusions: Matt 27:26–48 (John 19:1–3, 29); Isa 53:2; Ps 22:17 (21:18 Vulg.); Ps 45:2 (44:3 Vulg.).

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (Migne's marginal heading left in the text): Alleluia quid. HoC tempus → HoC tempus.

Topics: Fasting, Christology, Passion and death of Christ, Easter and the church year

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 254.5 (PL 38:1139; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/augustine-sermones/254-5). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-254-5) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).

254.6PL 38:1139–1140

Laudemus ergo, fratres, Dominum; quia rjus fidclia promissa retinemus, nondum accepimus. Parum putatis, quia promissorem tenemus, ut jam dcbitorem cxigajuus? Promisor Deus debitor factus est bonitate sua, non prarogantia nostra. Quid ei dedimus, ut eum debitorem teneamus? An forte quod audistis in Psalmo: Quid retribuam Domino? Primo quando dicit, Quid retribuam Domino? verba suut debituris, non dehilum exigentis. Pra:rogatum cst illi: Quid retribuam Do mino? Quid esl, Quid retribuam? Rependam. Pro qua re? Pro omnibus quæ retribuit mihi. Quid retribuit mihi? Primo nihil eram, et fecit me; perieram, quaesivit me; quærens invenit me, captivum redemit me, emptum liberavit me, de servo fratrem fecit me. Quid retribuam Domino? Non habes quod retribuas. Quando ab illo totum exspectas, quid habes retribuere? Sed exspecla: nescio quid vult dicere. Cur quærit, Quid retribuam Domino pro omnibus quæ retribuit mihi? Circumspiciens undique quid retribuat, quasi invenit. Quid invenit? Calicem salutaris accipiam. Retribuere cogitabas, adhuc accipcre quæris. Vide, rogo. Si adhuc accipere quæris, adhuc debitor eris; quando retributor? Si ergo semper debitor eris, quando retribues? Non invenis quod retribuas: nisi quod dederit, non habebis.

Let us praise the Lord, then, brothers, because we hold his faithful promises; we have not yet received them. Do you think it little that we hold him as promiser, so that we may now claim him as debtor? God the promiser has become a debtor by his own goodness, not by our advance payment. What have we given him, that we should hold him as debtor? Perhaps what you heard in the Psalm: “What shall I repay to the Lord?” First, when he says, “What shall I repay to the Lord?” the words are those of one who will owe, not of one who claims a debt. Something has been paid out to him in advance: “What shall I repay to the Lord?” What is “What shall I repay”? Pay back. For what? “For all the things he has repaid to me.” What has he repaid to me? First I was nothing, and he made me; I had perished, he sought me; seeking, he found me; captive, he redeemed me; bought, he set me free; from a slave he made me a brother. “What shall I repay to the Lord?” You have nothing to repay. When you expect everything from him, what do you have to repay? But wait: he wants to say something. Why does he ask, “What shall I repay to the Lord for all the things he has repaid to me?” Looking around on every side for what to repay, he seems to have found something. What did he find? “I will take the cup of salvation.” You were thinking of repaying, and you are still seeking to receive. See, I beg you. If you still seek to receive, you will still be a debtor; when will you be a repayer? If, then, you will always be a debtor, when will you repay? You do not find anything to repay: you will have nothing except what he has given.

Ps 116:12 (115:3 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 116:13 (115:4 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 15:24 (echo, medium confidence) · Luke 15:6 (echo, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: God became our debtor by promising, not because we gave him anything; the psalmist looks for something to repay and finds only that he will take the cup of salvation, receiving still more.

  • Quotations: Ps 116:12–13 (115:3–4 Vulg.). Allusions: Luke 15:4–6, 24; John 15:15; Rom 8:29.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (Migne's marginal heading left in the text): Deo retribuere aliquid non valemus. Laudemus → Laudemus.

Topics: Grace, Salvation

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 254.6 (PL 38:1139–1140; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/augustine-sermones/254-6). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-254-6) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).

254.7PL 38:1140

V ide, quando dicebas, Quid retribuam? ad illud pcrtinet quod dixisti, Omnis homo mendax ( Psal. CXV, 11-13). Qui enim voluerit dicere quia retribuet aliquid Deo, mendax est (omnia ab illo speranda sunt; a nobis ipsis praeter illum nihil nisi forte peccatum), et mendacium de suo loquitur. Vere plene de suo abundat homo; mendacium omnino hic habet et thesaurum mendaciorum: cor suum mentiatur, quantum potest, uon deficit; fingat quidquid potest, mentiatur quidquid potest. Quare? Quia quod gratis habet, de se habet, non illud emit. Quando venitur ad veritatem, si verax vult esse, non erit de suo. Mendax Petrus de suo. Ubi mendax? Promisit nobis Dominus passionem: et dicit, Absit a te, non fiat illud. Omnis homo mendax. Unde mendax? Ipsum Dominum audi: Non sapis quœ Dei sunt, sed quœ sunt hominis. Verax autem Petrus: quando? Tu es Christus Filius Dei vivi. Unde ista veritas homini mendaci? Ecce homo dicit,Tue. Christus Filius Dei vivi. Quis dicit? Petrus. Quid erat Petrus? Homo, qui dixil verum. Certe, Omnis homo mendax. Ecce, ecce lingua ejus; ecce lingua de lingua ejus: quomodo, Omnis homo mendax? Audi, quia Omnis homo mendax > quia de suo. Ergo unde Petrus verax? Audi ipsam veritatem: Beatus es, Simon Bar-Jona. Unde beatus? de suo? Absit! Quia tibi non revelavit caro et sanguis, sed Pater meus qui in cœlis eat.

See: when you were saying, “What shall I repay?” what you said belongs to this: “Every man is a liar.” For whoever wants to say that he will repay something to God is a liar (all things are to be hoped for from him; from ourselves apart from him nothing except perhaps sin), and he speaks a lie from his own. Truly man abounds fully from his own: he has here a lie altogether, and a treasury of lies. Let his heart lie as much as it can, it does not run short; let him invent whatever he can, let him lie whatever he can. Why? Because what he has for nothing he has from himself; he did not buy it. When it comes to the truth, if he wants to be truthful, it will not be from his own. Peter was a liar from his own. Where was he a liar? The Lord foretold his passion to us, and Peter says: “Far be it from you; let it not happen.” “Every man is a liar.” Why a liar? Hear the Lord himself: “You do not savor the things of God, but the things of men.” But Peter was truthful: when? “You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.” Where did this truth come to a lying man? See, a man says: “You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.” Who says it? Peter. What was Peter? A man, who spoke the truth. Certainly, “every man is a liar.” See, see his tongue; see the tongue from his tongue: how is “every man a liar”? Hear: “every man is a liar,” because of his own. So from where was Peter truthful? Hear the Truth itself: “Blessed are you, Simon Bar-Jona.” Blessed from where? From his own? Far from it! “For flesh and blood has not revealed it to you, but my Father who is in heaven.”

Ps 116:11 (115:2 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 16:21 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 16:22 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 16:23 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 16:16 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 16:17 (quotation, high confidence) · John 8:44 (echo, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Every man is a liar from his own resources, as Peter was when he opposed the passion; when Peter confessed Christ truly, it was by the Father’s revelation, not from himself.

  • Quotations: Ps 116:11 (115:2 Vulg.); Matt 16:22–23; Matt 16:16–17. The printed reference “(Psal. CXV, 11-13)” mixes Hebrew and Vulgate numbering.

Topics: Rome and Peter, Grace

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 254.7 (PL 38:1140; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/augustine-sermones/254-7). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-254-7) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).

254.8PL 38:1140

Laudemus ergo Domicum, charissimi, laudemus Deum, dicamus Alleluia. Significemus istis diebus diem sine fine; signilicemus locum immortalitatis, tempus immortalitatis; festinemus ad domum æternam. Beati qui habitant in domo tua; in sPecula sœculorum laudabunt te. Lex dicit, Scriptura dicit, veritas dicit. Venturi sumus ad domum Dei, quae est in coelis. Ibi non quinquaginta diebus Deuni laudabimus; sed qnemadmodum scriptum cst, in sœcula sœculorum. Videbimus, amabimus, laudabimus. Nee quod videbimus deficiet, uec quod amabimus peribit, nec quod laudabimus tacebit; sempiternum totum erit, sine fine crit. Laudemus, laudcmus; sed non solis vocibus, laudemus et moribus: laudet li. gua, laudet vita; sed habeat charitatem infinitam. Conversi ad Dominum, ctc.

Let us praise the Lord, then, dearly beloved, let us praise God, let us say Alleluia. Let us signify in these days the day without end; let us signify the place of immortality, the time of immortality; let us hasten to the eternal home. “Blessed are those who dwell in your house; they will praise you for ages of ages.” The Law says it, Scripture says it, the Truth says it. We are going to come to the house of God, which is in heaven. There we shall not praise God for fifty days but, as it is written, for ages of ages. We shall see, we shall love, we shall praise. Neither will what we see fail, nor will what we love perish, nor will what we praise fall silent; all will be everlasting, it will be without end. Let us praise, let us praise; but not with voices alone, let us praise with our conduct too: let the tongue praise, let the life praise; but let it have infinite charity. Turning to the Lord, etc.

Ps 84:4 (83:5 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The fifty days of Alleluia signify the endless praise of God in his heavenly house; it must be praised by life as well as by tongue.

  • Quotation: Ps 84:4 (83:5 Vulg.). “Turning to the Lord, etc.” is the opening of Augustine’s customary closing prayer.

Topics: Eschatology, Prayer

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 254.8 (PL 38:1140; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/augustine-sermones/254-8). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-254-8) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).