Against Heresies 1.0.1–1.4.5

Latin text: Harvey 1857 (Latin text: Harvey (1857), transcribed from archive.org OCR of the printed volumes; section numbers checked against Stieren (1853)).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0). Compare: Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 1 (1885), Irenaeus, Against Heresies.

Show

Against 1, chapter 0

1.0.1Harvey 1

Quoniam veritatem refutantes quidam inducunt verba jenealogias infinitas, que quaestiones magis prostant, quemadmodum A postolus ait, quam «dificationem Det, que est in Jide; et per eam, quise est subdole exercitata verisimilitudo, trans. ducunt sensum eorum, qui sunt inexpertiores, et in captivitatem ducunt eos, falsantes verba Domini, interpretatores mali eorum, quae bene dicta sunt, effecti: et multos evertunt, attrahentes eos sub occasione agnitionis ab eo, qui hanc universitatem constituit et ordinavit; quasi altius aliquid et majus habentes ostendere, quam eum, qui eclum et terram, et omnia que in eis sunt, fecit; suadenter quidem illi illieiunt per verborum artem simpliciores ad requirendi modum, male autem perdunt eos, in eo quod blasphemam et impiam ipsorum sententiam faciant in Fabricatorem, non discernere valentium falsum a vero.

Since certain people, setting the truth aside, bring in words and endless genealogies, “which promote questions rather than the edification of God which is in faith,” as the apostle says, and by their craftily practised plausibility lead astray the minds of the less experienced and take them captive, falsifying the words of the Lord, having become bad interpreters of what was well said; and they overthrow many, drawing them away, under pretext of knowledge, from him who established and ordered this universe, as though they had something higher and greater to show than him who made heaven and earth and all that is in them. Persuasively they entice the simpler by the art of words into their manner of inquiry, but ruinously they destroy them, in that they form their blasphemous and impious opinion against the Maker, while these people cannot tell the false from the true.

1 Tim 1:4 (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Tim 3:6 (allusion, medium confidence) · Exod 20:11 (echo, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Irenaeus introduces the false teachers who, under pretext of knowledge, draw the simple away from the Creator.

  • Quotation: 1 Tim 1:4; “made heaven and earth and all that is in them” echoes Exod 20:11 (Ps 146:6; Acts 4:24). The surviving Greek has “lying words”; the Latin as printed here has only “words”. Harvey's bracketed alternative reading “ornavit” (“adorned”) for “ordinavit” (“ordered”) is removed as note debris.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (Harvey's note on an alternative reading, removed; OCR: decorative initial word misread; OCR: digits for the word 'quae'): znus veritatem → Quoniam veritatem; 4.89 bene → quae bene; [L. ornavit] → .

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Irenaeus, Haer. 1.0.1 (Harvey 1; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/irenaeus-adversus-haereses/1-0-1/#p-1-0-1).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-irenaeus-adversus-haereses-1-0-1) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the ancient Latin translation as printed by Harvey (Cambridge, 1857), from the OCR of the printed edition with slips corrected as logged, in Massuet's section numbering; lines lost in the scan supplied from Stieren's edition (1848–53) where noted; each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation in ANF 1 (1885).

1.0.2Harvey 1:3–5

Error enim secundum semetipsum non ostenditur, ne denudatus fiat comprehensibilis, suasorio autem cooperimento subdole adornatus, et ipsa veritate (ridiculum est et dicere) veriorem semetipsum prestat, ut decipiat exteriori phantasmate rudiores: quemadmodum a meliore nobis dictum est de hujusmodi: Quoniam lapidem pretiosum smaragdum magni pretii apud quosdam, vitreum in ejus contumeliam per artem assimilatum, quoadusque non adest, qui potest probare, et artificium arguere, quod subdole sit factum. — Quum enim commixtum fuerit seramentum argento, quis facile poterit, rudis cum sit, hoc probare? Igitur ne forte et cum nostro delicto abripiantur quidam quasi oves a lupis. ignorantes eos propter exterius ovilis pellis superindumentum, a quibus cavere denunciavit nobis Dominus, similia quidem nobis loquentes, dissimilia vero sentientes: necessarium duxi, cum legerim Commentarios ipsorum, quemadmodum ipsi dieunt, Valentini discipulorum, quibusdam autem ipsorum et congressus, et apprehendens sententiam ipsorum, manifestare tibi, Dilectissime, portentuosissima et altissima mysteria, que non omnes capiunt, quia non omnes cerebrum habent, ut et tu cognoscens ea, omnibus his, qui sunt tecum, manifesta facias, et precipias eis observare se a profundo insensationis, et ejus, quse est in Deum, blasphemationis. Et quantum nobis virtutis adest, sententiam ipsorum, qui nunc aliud docent, dico autem eorum, qui sunt circa Ptolemaeum, quse est velut flosculum Valentini schol, compendiose et manifeste ostendemus, et aliis occasiones dabimus secundum nostram mediocritatem ad evertendum eam, non stantia, neque apta veritati ostendentes ea, quz ab iis dicuntur: neque conscribere consueti, neque qui sermonum arti studuerimus: dilectione autem nos adhortante, et tibi et omnibus, qui sunt tecum, manifestare, que usque adhuc erant absconse, jam autem secundum gratiam Dei in manifestum venerunt doctrine ipsorum. Nihil enim est coopertum, quod non manifestabitur; et nihil absconsum, quod non cognoscetur.

For error is not displayed as it is in itself, lest, stripped bare, it become detectable; but, craftily adorned with a persuasive covering, it makes itself appear by its outward show truer than the truth itself (it is ridiculous even to say so), so as to deceive the inexperienced. As one better than we has said of such things: a piece of glass made by art to resemble the precious stone, the emerald so highly valued by some, insults it, until someone is present who can test it and expose the craft by which it was cunningly made. And when brass has been mixed with silver, who that is unskilled will easily be able to test it? Therefore, lest through our fault some should be carried off like sheep by wolves, not recognizing them because of their outer covering of sheepskin (those against whom the Lord warned us to beware, who speak like us but think otherwise), I have thought it necessary, having read the commentaries of the disciples of Valentinus, as they themselves call them, and having met some of them and grasped their opinion, to make known to you, beloved, their portentous and profound mysteries, which not all grasp, because not all have brains; so that you too, knowing them, may make them known to all who are with you, and urge them to guard themselves against the abyss of senselessness and of blasphemy against God. And as far as our ability allows, we will set out briefly and clearly the opinion of those who now teach otherwise (I mean the followers of Ptolemy, which is a kind of flower of the school of Valentinus), and will give others occasions, according to our modest ability, to overthrow it, showing that what they say has no foundation and does not fit the truth. We are not accustomed to writing, nor have we studied the art of speech; but love urges us to make known to you and to all who are with you the doctrines that until now were hidden, but have now by the grace of God come into the open. “For nothing is covered that will not be revealed, and nothing hidden that will not be known.”

Matt 7:15 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 10:26 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 12:2 (quotation, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Irenaeus explains that error disguises itself as truth and that he will expose the teaching of Ptolemy's followers, a branch of the Valentinian school.

  • “One better than we” is unidentified (perhaps an earlier Christian writer). Quotations and allusions: Matt 7:15 (wolves in sheep's clothing); Matt 10:26 (Luke 12:2). The Latin says “blasphemy against God”; the Greek fragment has “against Christ”.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR: decorative initial word misread; stray Greek character from Harvey's notes): Erref enim → Error enim; non ὃ manifestabitur → non manifestabitur.

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Irenaeus, Haer. 1.0.2 (Harvey 1:3–5; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/irenaeus-adversus-haereses/1-0-1/#p-1-0-2).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-irenaeus-adversus-haereses-1-0-2) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the ancient Latin translation as printed by Harvey (Cambridge, 1857), from the OCR of the printed edition with slips corrected as logged, in Massuet's section numbering; lines lost in the scan supplied from Stieren's edition (1848–53) where noted; each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation in ANF 1 (1885).

1.0.3Harvey 1:6–8

Non autem exquires a nobis, qui apud Celtas commoramur, et in barbarum sermonem plerumque vacamus, orationis artem, quam non didicimus, neque vim conscriptoris, quam non affectavimus, neque ornamentum verborum, neque suadelam, quam nescimus: sed simpliciter et vere et idiotice ea, que tibi cum dilectione scripta sunt, cum dilectione percipies, et ipse auges ea penes te, ut magis idoneus quam nos, quasi semen et initia accipiens a nobis: et in latitudine sensus tui in multum fructificabis ea, quae in paucis a nobis dicta sunt, et potenter asseres iis, qui tecum sunt, ea que invalide a nobis relata sunt. Et quemadmodum nos elaboravimus, olim querenti tibi discere Sententiam eorum, non solum facere tibi manifestam, sed et subministrationem dare, uti ostenderemus eam falsam: sic et tu efficaciter reliquis ministrabis secundum gratiam, qus tibia Domino data est, ut jam non abstrahantur homines ab illorum suadela, que est talis.

You will not expect from us, who live among the Celts and are mostly occupied with a barbarous language, the art of speech, which we have not learned, nor a writer's power, which we have not cultivated, nor elegance of words, nor persuasiveness, which we do not know. But you will receive with love what has been written to you with love, simply, truly, and plainly; and you yourself will make it grow in your own mind, as one more capable than we, receiving it from us as seed and beginnings; and in the breadth of your understanding you will make fruitful in abundance what we have said in few words, and will powerfully present to those who are with you what we have weakly related. And as we, at your long-standing request to learn their opinion, have taken pains not only to make it plain to you but also to supply the means of showing it to be false, so you too will effectively minister to the rest, according to the grace given you by the Lord, so that people may no longer be drawn away by their persuasion, which is as follows.

Notes and citation

Summary: Irenaeus apologizes for his plain style, written among the Celts, and asks his friend to develop and pass on what he sends.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR: digits for the word 'iis'; OCR: digits for the word 'quae'; editor's chapter title): 418 in paucis → quae in paucis; asseres 118, qui → asseres iis, qui; Narratio omnis argumenti discipulorum Valentine. → .

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Irenaeus, Haer. 1.0.3 (Harvey 1:6–8; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/irenaeus-adversus-haereses/1-0-1/#p-1-0-3).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-irenaeus-adversus-haereses-1-0-3) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the ancient Latin translation as printed by Harvey (Cambridge, 1857), from the OCR of the printed edition with slips corrected as logged, in Massuet's section numbering; lines lost in the scan supplied from Stieren's edition (1848–53) where noted; each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation in ANF 1 (1885).

Against 1, chapter 1

1.1.1Harvey 1:8–10

Dicunr esse quendam in invisibilibus, et inenarrabilibus alitudinibus perfectum /Eonem, qui ante fuit, Hunc autem et Proarchen, et Propatora, et Bython vocant: esse autem illum invisibilem et quem nulla res capere possit. Quum autem a nullo caperetur, et esset invisibilis, sempiternus, et ingenitus, in silentio et in quiete multa fuisse in immensis aeonibus. Cum ipso autem fuisse et Enncean, quam etiam Charin, et Sigen vocant: et aliquando voluisse a semetipso emittere hune Bythum initium omnium, et velut semen prolationem hanc praemitti voluit, et eam deposuisse quasi in vulva ejus, que cum eo - erat, Sige. Hanc autem suscepisse semen hoc, et pregnantem factam generasse Nun, similem et sequalem ei, qui emiserat, et solum eapientem magnitudinem Patris. Nun autem hune, et Unigenitum vocant, et Patrem, et Initium omnium. Una autem cum eo emissam Veritatem, et hane esse primam et primogenitam Pythagoricam quaternationem, quam et radicem omnium dicunt. Est enim Bythus et Sige, deinde Nus et Alethia., Sentientem autem Unigenitum hune in qua prolatus est, emisisse et ipsum Logon et Zoen, patrem omnium eorum, qui post se futuri essent, et initium et formationem universi Pleromatis. De Logo autem et Zoe emissum secundum conjugationem, Hominem et Ecclesiam, et esse hanc primogenitam Octonationem, radicem et substantiam omnium, quatuor nominibus apud eos nuncupatam, Bython, et Nun, et Logon, et Anthropon. Esse enim illorum unumquemque masculo-fceminam, sic, initio Propatorem illum coisse secundum conjugationem sus Ennee, id est, cogitationi, quam Gratiam et Silentium vocant: Unigenitum autem, hoc est, Nun Alethim, id est, Veritati: Logon autem Aeow, id est, Vite: et Anthropon cum Ecclesia.

They say that in the invisible and unnameable heights there was a perfect Aeon, existing before all. Him they also call Proarche (First Beginning), Propator (First Father), and Bythus (Depth). And that he was invisible, and such that nothing could contain him; and since he could be contained by nothing, and was invisible, everlasting, and unbegotten, he was in silence and in deep rest for boundless ages; and that with him was Ennoea (Thought), whom they also call Charis (Grace) and Sige (Silence). And at some time this Bythus wished to put forth from himself the beginning of all things, and willed that this emission be put forth like a seed, and deposited it, as in a womb, in Sige, who was with him. She received this seed, became pregnant, and bore Nus (Mind), like and equal to the one who had emitted him, and alone grasping the greatness of the Father. This Nus they also call the Only-begotten, the Father, and the Beginning of all things. Together with him Aletheia (Truth) was emitted; and this is the first and primal Pythagorean Tetrad, which they also call the root of all things: for there are Bythus and Sige, then Nus and Aletheia. And this Only-begotten, perceiving for what purpose he had been put forth, himself emitted Logos (Word) and Zoe (Life), the father of all who were to come after him, and the beginning and formation of the whole Pleroma. From Logos and Zoe, by conjunction, Anthropos (Man) and Ecclesia (Church) were emitted; and this is the primal Ogdoad, the root and substance of all things, called among them by four names: Bythus, Nus, Logos, and Anthropos. For each of them is male-female, thus: first the Propator was joined in conjunction with his Ennoea, that is, Thought, whom they call Grace and Silence; the Only-begotten, that is, Nus, with Aletheia, that is, Truth; Logos with Zoe, that is, Life; and Anthropos with Ecclesia.

Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.

Notes and citation

Summary: Irenaeus sets out the Valentinian account of the first eight Aeons, the Ogdoad.

  • Words lost in the scan of Harvey's edition are supplied from Stieren's edition. The Latin gives the Aeons' Greek names; their meanings are added in parentheses.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR: Greek letters for 'et'): Charin, οὐ Sigen → Charin, et Sigen.

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Irenaeus, Haer. 1.1.1 (Harvey 1:8–10; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/irenaeus-adversus-haereses/1-0-1/#p-1-1-1).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-irenaeus-adversus-haereses-1-1-1) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the ancient Latin translation as printed by Harvey (Cambridge, 1857), from the OCR of the printed edition with slips corrected as logged, in Massuet's section numbering; lines lost in the scan supplied from Stieren's edition (1848–53) where noted; each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation in ANF 1 (1885).

1.1.2Harvey 1:10–11

Hos autem /Eonas in gloriam Patris emissos, volentes et ipsos de suo clarificare Patrem, emisisse emissiones in conjugatione; Logon quidem et Zoen posteaquam emissus est Homo et Ecclesia, Nus simul accepit probationis sue offictum, emit ipse alteros decem /Eonas, quorum nomina dicunt hsec: Bythius et Mixis, Ageratos et Henosis, Autophyes et Hedone, Acinetos et Synerasis, Monogenes et Macaria. Hi decem ones, quos dicunt ex Logo et Zoe emissos. Anthropon autem et ipsum emisisse cum Ecclesia /Eonas duodecim, quibus nomina hee donant: Paracletus et Pistis, Patricos et Elpis, Metricos et Agape, /Enos et Synesis, Ecclesiasticos et Macariotes, Theletos et Sophia.

These Aeons, emitted for the glory of the Father, and wishing themselves to glorify the Father by something of their own, emitted emissions in conjunction. Logos and Zoe, after Anthropos and Ecclesia had been emitted, emitted ten other Aeons, whose names they give as these: Bythius and Mixis, Ageratos and Henosis, Autophyes and Hedone, Acinetos and Syncrasis, Monogenes and Macaria. These are the ten Aeons whom they say were emitted from Logos and Zoe. And Anthropos himself, with Ecclesia, emitted twelve Aeons, to whom they give these names: Paracletus and Pistis, Patricos and Elpis, Metricos and Agape, Aenos and Synesis, Ecclesiasticos and Macariotes, Theletos and Sophia.

Notes and citation

Summary: The Ogdoad emits a further ten and twelve Aeons, ending with Theletos and Sophia.

  • The Latin of the second sentence is garbled in the scan (“Nus simul accepit probationis suae officium …”); it is translated by sense, as the surviving Greek reads.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (stray line number): Macariotes, 5 Theletos → Macariotes, Theletos.

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Irenaeus, Haer. 1.1.2 (Harvey 1:10–11; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/irenaeus-adversus-haereses/1-0-1/#p-1-1-2).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-irenaeus-adversus-haereses-1-1-2) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the ancient Latin translation as printed by Harvey (Cambridge, 1857), from the OCR of the printed edition with slips corrected as logged, in Massuet's section numbering; lines lost in the scan supplied from Stieren's edition (1848–53) where noted; each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation in ANF 1 (1885).

1.1.3Harvey 1:11–12

Hi sunt triginta erroris eorum ones, qui tacentur et non agnoscuntur. Hoc invisibile et spiritale secundum eos Pleroma, tripartite divisum in octonationem, et decada, et duodecada: et propter hoc Salvatorem dicunt (nec enim Dominum eum nominare volunt) triginta annis in manifesto nihil fecisse, ostendentem mysterium horum /Eonum. Sed et in parabola eorum operariorum, qui in vineam mittuntur, dicunt manifestissime triginta hos /Éonas declaratos. Mittuntur enim alii quidem circa primam horam, alii circa tertiam, alii cirea sextam, ali circa nonam, alii cirea undecimam. Composit igitur predict hor: in semetipsas, triginta numerum adimplent. Una enim, et tres, et sex, et novem, et undecim, triginta fiunt. Per horas autem /Eonas manifestari volunt: et hc esse magna et admirabilia et abscondita mysteria, que ipsi fructificant: et sicubi quid eorum, Squse dicuntur in scripturis, poterunt adaptare et assimilare figmento suo.

These are the thirty Aeons of their error, which are kept in silence and not known. This, according to them, is the invisible and spiritual Pleroma, divided into three: an Ogdoad, a Decad, and a Duodecad. And for this reason they say that the Saviour (for they will not call him Lord) did nothing openly for thirty years, showing the mystery of these Aeons. And in the parable of the labourers sent into the vineyard, they say, these thirty Aeons are most plainly declared: for some are sent about the first hour, others about the third, others about the sixth, others about the ninth, others about the eleventh. These hours, added together, make up the number thirty: for one, three, six, nine, and eleven make thirty. By the hours they hold that the Aeons are shown. And these are the great, wonderful, and hidden mysteries which they themselves bring to fruit, wherever they can adapt and liken anything said in the Scriptures to their fiction.

Luke 3:23 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 20:1–6 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The Valentinians find their thirty Aeons in the Saviour's thirty hidden years and in the hours of the parable of the labourers.

  • Allusions: Luke 3:23 (Jesus about thirty years old); Matt 20:1–16 (labourers in the vineyard).

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Irenaeus, Haer. 1.1.3 (Harvey 1:11–12; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/irenaeus-adversus-haereses/1-0-1/#p-1-1-3).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-irenaeus-adversus-haereses-1-1-3) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the ancient Latin translation as printed by Harvey (Cambridge, 1857), from the OCR of the printed edition with slips corrected as logged, in Massuet's section numbering; lines lost in the scan supplied from Stieren's edition (1848–53) where noted; each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation in ANF 1 (1885).

Against 1, chapter 2

1.2.1Harvey 1:12

Et propatorem quidem eorum cognosci soli dicunt ei, qui ex eo natus est, Monogeni, hoc est, No: reliquis vero omnibus invisibilem et incomprehensibilem esse. Solus autem Nus, secundum eos delectabatur videns Patrem, et magnitudinem immensam ejus considerans exultabat, et excogitabat reliquis quoque /Eonibus participare magnitudinem Patris; quantus et quam magnus existeret, et quemadmodum erat sine initio, et incapabilia, et incomprehensibilis ad videndum. Continuit autem eum Sige voluntate Patris, quoniam vellet omnes hos in intellectum et desiderium exquisitionis Patris sui adducere. Et reliqui quidem ones omnes tacite quodammodo desiderabant prolatorem seminis sui videre, et eam, qua sine initio est, radicem contemplari.

Their Propator, they say, is known only to the one born from him, the Monogenes, that is, Nus; to all the rest he is invisible and incomprehensible. According to them, Nus alone delighted in seeing the Father and exulted in considering his immeasurable greatness, and planned to share with the other Aeons too the greatness of the Father: how great and how vast he was, and how he was without beginning, uncontainable, and incomprehensible to sight. But Sige restrained him by the Father's will, because he wished to lead them all to the thought and desire of seeking out their Father. And the other Aeons, all of them, in a kind of quiet way desired to see the one who had emitted their seed and to contemplate the root that is without beginning.

Notes and citation

Summary: Only Nus knows the Father; the other Aeons quietly long to see him.

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Irenaeus, Haer. 1.2.1 (Harvey 1:12; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/irenaeus-adversus-haereses/1-0-1/#p-1-2-1).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-irenaeus-adversus-haereses-1-2-1) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the ancient Latin translation as printed by Harvey (Cambridge, 1857), from the OCR of the printed edition with slips corrected as logged, in Massuet's section numbering; lines lost in the scan supplied from Stieren's edition (1848–53) where noted; each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation in ANF 1 (1885).

1.2.2Harvey 1:12–16

Presiliit autem valde ultimus et junior de duodecade ea, quae ab Anthropo et Ecclesia emissa fuerat, on, hoc est, Sophia: et passa est passionem sine complexu conjugis Theleti: que exorsa quidem fuerat in iis, quae sunt erga Nun et Alethiam; derivavit autem in hunc [ /Eonem, id est, Sophiam ], demutatam, sub occasione quidem dilectionis, temeritatis autem, quoniam non communicaverat Patri perfecto, quemadmodum et Nus. Passionem autem esse exquisitionem Patris: voluit enim, ut dicunt, magnitudinem ejus comprehendere. Dehinc quum non posset, quoniam impossibilem rem aggrederetur, in magna agonia constitutum propter magnitudinem altitudinis, et propter quod investigabile Patris est, et propter eam qus erat erga eun dilectionem, quum extenderetur semper in priora, a dulcedine ejus noviseime forte absorptum fuisset, et resolutum in universam substantiam, nisi ei, que confirmat, et extra inenarrabilem magnitudinem custodit omnia, occurrisset virtuti. Hanc autem virtutem et Horon vocant; a qua abstentum et confirmatum, vix reversum in semetipsum, et credentem jam, quoniam incomprehenaibilis est Pater, deposuisse pristinam intentionem cum ea, quae acciderat, passione, ex illa stuporis admiratione.

But the very last and youngest of the Dodecad emitted by Anthropos and Ecclesia, the Aeon Sophia, leapt far forward and suffered a passion without the embrace of her consort Theletos. The passion had begun among those around Nus and Aletheia, but it passed over into this [Aeon, that is, Sophia], who was changed, under pretext of love but really of rashness, because she had not had communion with the perfect Father, as Nus had. The passion was a search for the Father: for she wished, as they say, to comprehend his greatness. Then, being unable, since she was attempting an impossible thing, and finding herself in great agony because of the greatness of the depth, the unsearchableness of the Father, and her love for him, as she strained ever forward she would at last have been swallowed up by his sweetness and dissolved into the universal substance, had she not met the power that strengthens all things and guards them outside the unutterable greatness. This power they also call Horos (Limit). Restrained and strengthened by it, and brought back to herself with difficulty, and persuaded now that the Father is incomprehensible, she laid aside her former intention, together with the passion that had come upon her from that stupefied amazement.

Notes and citation

Summary: Sophia, the youngest Aeon, rashly seeks to comprehend the Father and is saved from dissolution by Horos.

  • The words in square brackets are Harvey's supplement, printed as part of his text.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR: Greek letters for 'et'; stray line number): Nun οὐ Alethiam → Nun et Alethiam; 5demutatam → demutatam; et 6 confirmatum → et confirmatum.

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Irenaeus, Haer. 1.2.2 (Harvey 1:12–16; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/irenaeus-adversus-haereses/1-0-1/#p-1-2-2).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-irenaeus-adversus-haereses-1-2-2) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the ancient Latin translation as printed by Harvey (Cambridge, 1857), from the OCR of the printed edition with slips corrected as logged, in Massuet's section numbering; lines lost in the scan supplied from Stieren's edition (1848–53) where noted; each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation in ANF 1 (1885).

1.2.3Harvey 1:16–18

Quidam autem ipsorum hujusmodi passionem et reversionem Sophiae, velut fabulam narrant, impossibilem et incomprehensibilem rem eam aggressam, peperisse substantiam informem, qualem naturam habebat femina parere: in quam cum intendisset, primo quidem contristatam, propter inconsummationem generationis: post deinde timuisse, ne hoc ipsum finem habeat: dehinc expavisse et aporiatam, id est, confusam, quaerentem causam, et quemadmodum absconderet id, quod erat natum. In iis autem passionibus factam, accepisse regressionem, et in Patrem regredi conari: et aliquamdiu ausam, tamen defecisse, et supplicem Patris factam. Una autem cum ea rogasse et reliquos Aeonas, maxime autem Nun. Hine dicunt primum initium habuisse substantiam materi», de ignorantia, et tedio, et timore, et stupore.

Some of them tell the passion and return of Sophia like a fable: that, having attempted an impossible and incomprehensible thing, she brought forth a formless substance, such a nature as a female could bear. When she looked at it she was first grieved because of the imperfection of the birth, then afraid lest it should come to an end, then terrified and at a loss, that is, confused, seeking the cause and how she might hide what had been born. Being in these passions, she turned back and tried to return to the Father; and after daring for a while she failed and became a suppliant of the Father. The other Aeons, especially Nus, joined her in entreaty. Hence, they say, the substance of matter had its first beginning, from ignorance, grief, fear, and stupor.

Notes and citation

Summary: In another version Sophia bears a formless substance, from whose passions matter arises.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (stray line number): maxime autem 5Nun. → maxime autem Nun..

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Irenaeus, Haer. 1.2.3 (Harvey 1:16–18; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/irenaeus-adversus-haereses/1-0-1/#p-1-2-3).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-irenaeus-adversus-haereses-1-2-3) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the ancient Latin translation as printed by Harvey (Cambridge, 1857), from the OCR of the printed edition with slips corrected as logged, in Massuet's section numbering; lines lost in the scan supplied from Stieren's edition (1848–53) where noted; each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation in ANF 1 (1885).

1.2.4Harvey 1:18–20

Pater autem predictum Horon super hec per Monogenem premittit in imagine sua, sine conjuge masculo-femina. Patrem enim aliquando quidem cum conjuge Sige, modo vero et pro masculo, et pro fcemina esse volunt. Horon vero hune et Stauron, et Lytroten, et Carpisten, et Horotheten, et Metagogea vocant. dicunt mundatam et confirmatam Sophiam, et restitutam conjugi. Separata enim intentione ab ea cum appendice passione, ipsam quidem infra Pleroma perseverasse. vero ejus cum passione ab Horo separatam et crucifixam, et extra eum factam, esse quidem spiritalem substantiam, ut naturalem quendam onis impetum, informem vero et sine specie, quoniam nihil apprehendisset. Et propter hoc fructum ejus invalidum et foemineum dicunt.

The Father, through the Monogenes, puts forth the aforesaid Horos in his own image, without consort, male-female. For they hold that the Father is at one time with his consort Sige, but at another above male and above female. This Horos they also call Stauros (Cross), Lytrotes (Redeemer), Carpistes (Emancipator), Horothetes (Limit-setter), and Metagogeus (Conductor). [By him], they say, Sophia was purified and strengthened and restored to her consort. For when her intention had been separated from her with its accompanying passion, she herself remained within the Pleroma; but her [intention] with the passion was separated by Horos, crucified, and placed outside it. It was indeed a spiritual substance, being a natural impulse of an Aeon, but formless and without shape, because it had grasped nothing. And for this reason they call it a weak and female fruit.

Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.

Notes and citation

Summary: The Father emits Horos, who restores Sophia and casts her intention and passion outside the Pleroma.

  • The Latin “pro masculo et pro femina” renders Greek “above male and above female”. Words lost in the scan (“by him”, “her intention”) are supplied in brackets from the sense. “Crucified” renders the Latin; the Greek means “fenced off by the Stauros”.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (stray line number): et 5pro masculo → et pro masculo.

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Irenaeus, Haer. 1.2.4 (Harvey 1:18–20; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/irenaeus-adversus-haereses/1-0-1/#p-1-2-4).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-irenaeus-adversus-haereses-1-2-4) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the ancient Latin translation as printed by Harvey (Cambridge, 1857), from the OCR of the printed edition with slips corrected as logged, in Massuet's section numbering; lines lost in the scan supplied from Stieren's edition (1848–53) where noted; each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation in ANF 1 (1885).

1.2.5Harvey 1:20–23

Postea vero quam separata sit hsec extra Pleroma JEonum, et mater ejus redintegrata suse conjugationi, Monogenem iterum alteram emisisse conjugationem, secundum providentiam Patris, Christum et Spiritum sanctum, a quibus consummatos esse dicunt /Eonas. Christum enim docuisse eos conjugationis naturam, innati comprehensionem cognoscentes sufficientes, sive idoneos, esse: declarasse quoque in eis Patris agnitionem, quoniam incapabilis est, et incomprehonsibilis, et non est, neque videre, neque audire eum nisi per solum Monogenem. Et causam quidem stem perseverationis iis omnibus incomprehensibile Patris esse: generationis autem et formationis Monogenes, ille Nus... novam excludit comprehensibile ejus, quod quidem filius est. Et hsec quidem qui nunc emissus erat Christus in eis operatus est.

After this had been separated outside the Pleroma of the Aeons, and its mother restored to her conjunction, the Monogenes, according to the Father's forethought, emitted yet another pair, Christ and the Holy Spirit, by whom, they say, the Aeons were brought to completion. For Christ taught them the nature of conjunction, that those who know the comprehension of the Unbegotten are sufficient, or fit; and he declared among them the knowledge of the Father: that he is uncontainable and incomprehensible, and cannot be seen or heard except through the Monogenes alone. And the cause of the everlasting continuance of them all is what is incomprehensible of the Father; the cause of their generation and formation is what is comprehensible of him, that is, the Son. And these things the Christ who had just been emitted worked in them.

Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.

Notes and citation

Summary: Christ and the Holy Spirit are emitted to complete the Aeons; Christ teaches them that the Father is known only through the Monogenes.

  • The Latin of the clause on generation and formation is corrupt in the scan (“Monogenes, ille Nus … novam excludit”); it is translated by sense. A clause in the surviving Greek (“for the fixing and strengthening of the Pleroma”) is not in the Latin as printed here.

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Irenaeus, Haer. 1.2.5 (Harvey 1:20–23; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/irenaeus-adversus-haereses/1-0-1/#p-1-2-5).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-irenaeus-adversus-haereses-1-2-5) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the ancient Latin translation as printed by Harvey (Cambridge, 1857), from the OCR of the printed edition with slips corrected as logged, in Massuet's section numbering; lines lost in the scan supplied from Stieren's edition (1848–53) where noted; each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation in ANF 1 (1885).

1.2.6Harvey 1:24–25

Spiritus vero sanctus adsquatos eos omnes gratias agere docuit, et veram requiem induxit. Et sic forma et sententia similes factos /Eonas dicunt, universos factos Noas et Logos, et omnes Anthropos, et omnes Christos: et feminas similiter omnes Alethias, et Zoas, et Spiritus. et Ecclesias. Confirmata quoque in hoc omnia, et requiescentia ad perfectum, cum magno gaudio dicunt siquidem inapprehensibile ejus, perpehymnizare Propatorem, magne exultationis participantem. Et propter hoc beneficium una voluntate et sententia universum Pleroma /Eonum, consentiente Christo et Spiritu, unumquemque JEonum, quod habebat in se optimum et florentissimum conferentes, collationem fecisse: et hsc apte compingentes, et et gloriam Bythi perfectissimum decorem quendam, et sidus Pleromatis, perfectum fructum Jesum, quem et Salvatorem vocari, et Christum, et Logon patronymice, ac omnia, quoniam ab omnibus esset. Satellites quoque ei in honorem ipsorum ejusdem generis Angelos cum eo prolatos.

The Holy Spirit taught them, all now made equal, to give thanks, and brought in true rest. And so, they say, the Aeons were made alike in form and mind, all becoming Nuses and Logoi and Anthropoi and Christs, and the females likewise all Aletheias and Zoes and Spirits and Ecclesias. Everything being established in this and resting perfectly, with great joy, they say, they hymned the Propator, who shared in the great exultation. And for this benefit the whole Pleroma of the Aeons, with one will and mind, Christ and the Spirit consenting, each Aeon contributing what it had best and most flourishing in itself, made a collection; and fitting these together skilfully, [they emitted] to the glory of Bythus a most perfect beauty, as it were the star of the Pleroma, the perfect fruit, Jesus, whom they also call Saviour, Christ, and Logos after his Father, and All, because he was from all. And as his bodyguards, in their honour, angels of the same kind were emitted with him.

Notes and citation

Summary: The Aeons, at rest, together produce Jesus, the perfect fruit of the Pleroma, with angels as his bodyguards.

  • The Latin is damaged in the scan at several points (“siquidem inapprehensibile ejus”, “et et gloriam”); translated by sense. The surviving Greek adds that the Father set his seal on their act, which is not in the Latin as printed here.

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Irenaeus, Haer. 1.2.6 (Harvey 1:24–25; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/irenaeus-adversus-haereses/1-0-1/#p-1-2-6).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-irenaeus-adversus-haereses-1-2-6) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the ancient Latin translation as printed by Harvey (Cambridge, 1857), from the OCR of the printed edition with slips corrected as logged, in Massuet's section numbering; lines lost in the scan supplied from Stieren's edition (1848–53) where noted; each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation in ANF 1 (1885).

Against 1, chapter 3

1.3.1Harvey 1:26–27

Heo igitur est que intra Pleroma ipsorum dicitur negotiatio et passi /Eonis, et pene perditi, et quasi in multa materia propter inquisitionem Patris calamitas, et Hori, et Crucis ipsorum, et Redemptoris, et Carpist», et Horothetx, et Metagogei, ex agonia compago, et primi Christi cum Spiritu sancto de paenitentia a Patre ipsorum postrema /Eonum genesis, et secundi Christi, quem Soterem dicunt, ex collatione composita fabricatio. H»c autem manifeste quidem non esse dicta, quoniam non omnes capiunt agnitionem Salvatore per parabolas ostensa iis, qui possunt intelligere, sic: triginta /Eonas significari per triginta annos, sicut prediximus, in quibus nihil in manifesto dicunt fecisse Salvatorem; et per parabolam operariorum vineae. Et Paulum manifestissime dicunt /Eonas nominare sspissime, adhuc etiam et ordinem ipsorum servare, sic dicentem: In universas generationes scecult seculorum. Sed et nos ipsos denique in gratiarum actionibus dicentes, @wonas conum, ills /Eonas significare: et ubicunque Eon aut ones nominantur, in illos id referri volunt.

This, then, is what they tell of the transactions within their Pleroma: the calamity of the Aeon who suffered and nearly perished, as it were in much matter, through her search for the Father; her consolidation out of agony by Horos and their Cross, Redeemer, Emancipator, Limit-setter, and Conductor; the later generation of the Aeons, of the first Christ with the Holy Spirit, from the Father after the repentance; and the composite fabrication of the second Christ, whom they call Saviour, from the collection. These things, they say, were not stated openly, because not all grasp the knowledge, but were shown by the Saviour in parables to those able to understand, thus: the thirty Aeons are signified by the thirty years, as we said before, in which they say the Saviour did nothing openly, and by the parable of the labourers in the vineyard. And they say that Paul very plainly names the Aeons very often, and even keeps their order, when he says, “To all generations of the age of ages.” And they say that we ourselves, when we say “ages of ages” in the thanksgivings, signify those Aeons; and wherever “aeon” or “aeons” is named, they want it referred to them.

Eph 3:21 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 3:23 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 20:1–16 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The Valentinians claim their system was revealed in parables and find the Aeons wherever Scripture or the liturgy says “ages”.

  • Quotation: Eph 3:21. Latin “aeon” means both “age” and the Valentinian “Aeon”, which is the point of their argument. “In the thanksgivings” refers to the liturgical doxology.

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Irenaeus, Haer. 1.3.1 (Harvey 1:26–27; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/irenaeus-adversus-haereses/1-0-1/#p-1-3-1).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-irenaeus-adversus-haereses-1-3-1) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the ancient Latin translation as printed by Harvey (Cambridge, 1857), from the OCR of the printed edition with slips corrected as logged, in Massuet's section numbering; lines lost in the scan supplied from Stieren's edition (1848–53) where noted; each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation in ANF 1 (1885).

1.3.2Harvey 1:27–29

Duodecadis autem /Eonum emissionem significatam per id, quod duodecim annorum existens Dominus disputaverit cum legis doctoribus, et per Apostolorum electionem: duodecim enim Apostolos elegit. Et reliquos octodecim /Eonas manifestari per id, quod post resurrectionem & mortuis octodecim mensibus dicant conversatum eum cum discipulis. Sed et precedentes nominis ejus duas literas Iota et Eta, octodecim AXonas significanter manifestare. Et decem autem /Eonas similiter per Iota literam, quod precedit in nomine ejus, significari dicunt. Et propter hoc dixisse Salvatorem: Jota unum, aut unus apev non preterie, quoadusque omnia fiant.

The emission of the Duodecad of Aeons is signified, they say, by the Lord's disputing with the teachers of the law when he was twelve years old, and by the choice of the apostles: for he chose twelve apostles. And the remaining eighteen Aeons are shown by his having lived with the disciples, as they say, for eighteen months after his resurrection from the dead. And the first two letters of his name, Iota and Eta, show the eighteen Aeons by their numerical value. Likewise, they say, the ten Aeons are signified by the letter Iota, which begins his name. And for this reason the Saviour said, “One iota or one stroke will not pass away until all things take place.”

Luke 2:42–47 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 6:13 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 5:18 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The Valentinians find the twelve, eighteen, and ten Aeons in the Gospel story and in the letters of Jesus' name.

  • Allusions and quotation: Luke 2:42–47; Luke 6:13; Matt 5:18. Iota (10) and Eta (8) are the first letters of the Greek name Jesus; the eighteen months after the resurrection is a Valentinian claim.

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Irenaeus, Haer. 1.3.2 (Harvey 1:27–29; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/irenaeus-adversus-haereses/1-0-1/#p-1-3-2).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-irenaeus-adversus-haereses-1-3-2) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the ancient Latin translation as printed by Harvey (Cambridge, 1857), from the OCR of the printed edition with slips corrected as logged, in Massuet's section numbering; lines lost in the scan supplied from Stieren's edition (1848–53) where noted; each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation in ANF 1 (1885).

1.3.3Harvey 1:29–30

Hanc autem passionem, que circa duodecimum /Eonem facta est, significari dicunt per apostasiam Jude, qui duodecimus erat Apostolorum, et quoniam duodecimo mense passus est; uno enim anno volunt eum post baptisma predicasse. Adhuc etiam in ea qus profluvium sanguinis patiebatur, manifestissime hoc significari: duodecim enim annis passam eam, per Domini adventum esse sanatam, cum tetigisset fimbriam vestimenti ejus, et propter boc dixisse Salvatorem: Quis me tetigit? docentem discipulos quod faetum esset, inter /Eonas mysterium, et curationem passi /Eonis. Per illam enim que passa est duodecim annis, illa virtus significatur, eo quod extenderetur, et in immensum flueret ejus substantia, quemadmodum dicunt. Et nisi tetigiaset vestimentum illius filii, hoc est veritatis prim tetradis, que per fimbriam manifesta est, advenisse in omnem substantiam suam. stetit et quievit a passione per egressam virtutem filii. Sed autem hune Horon volunt, qui curavit eam, et passionem separavit ab ea.

This passion which happened to the twelfth Aeon, they say, is signified by the apostasy of Judas, who was the twelfth of the apostles, and by the Lord's suffering in the twelfth month; for they hold that he preached for one year after his baptism. Further, it is most plainly signified, they say, in the woman who suffered from a flow of blood: for after suffering twelve years she was healed by the Lord's coming, when she had touched the fringe of his garment; and for this reason the Saviour said, “Who touched me?”, teaching the disciples the mystery that had happened among the Aeons and the healing of the suffering Aeon. For by the woman who suffered twelve years that power is signified which was stretching out and whose substance was flowing into immensity, as they say; and had she not touched the garment of the Son, that is, Aletheia of the first Tetrad, who is shown by the fringe, she would have been dissolved into her universal substance. But she stood still and ceased from her passion through the power of the Son that went out. This, they hold, was Horos, who healed her and separated the passion from her.

Matt 10:4 (allusion, medium confidence) · Mark 5:25–34 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 8:45 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Judas's apostasy and the woman with the flow of blood are made into figures of Sophia's passion and healing.

  • Allusions and quotation: Matt 10:4 (Judas); Mark 5:25–34; Luke 8:44–46 (“Who touched me?”). The Latin “advenisse in omnem substantiam suam” is damaged; translated by sense (“would have been dissolved”). Harvey's bracketed note “[d. filii]” and a margin reference are removed.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (Harvey's note on a reading, removed; margin reference debris; stray mark; stray mark and line number): faetum Mee. +. esset → faetum esset; Per ^ illam → Per illam; filii [d. filii] → filii; *5advenisse → advenisse.

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Irenaeus, Haer. 1.3.3 (Harvey 1:29–30; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/irenaeus-adversus-haereses/1-0-1/#p-1-3-3).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-irenaeus-adversus-haereses-1-3-3) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the ancient Latin translation as printed by Harvey (Cambridge, 1857), from the OCR of the printed edition with slips corrected as logged, in Massuet's section numbering; lines lost in the scan supplied from Stieren's edition (1848–53) where noted; each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation in ANF 1 (1885).

1.3.4Harvey 1:30

Quod autem Salvatorem ex omnibus existentem Omne esse, per hoc responsum, Omne masculinum aperiens euleam, manifestar dicunt. Qui quum omnia sit, aperuit vulvam Excogitationis passi /Eonis, et separata ea extra Pleroma, quam etiam secundam Ogdoadem vocant, de qua paulo post dicemus. Et a Paulo autem manifeste propter hoc dictum dicunt: Et tpse est omnia. Et rursus: Omnia in ipsum, et ex ipso omnia. Et iterum: In ipso habitat omnis plenitudo divinitatis. Et illud: Recapttulata esse omnia tn Christo per Deum. Sic interpretantur dicta, et qusecunque alia sunt talia.

That the Saviour, existing from all, is the All, they say is shown by this saying: “Every male that opens the womb.” For he, being the All, opened the womb of the Thought of the suffering Aeon, when it had been separated outside the Pleroma, which they also call the second Ogdoad, of which we shall speak shortly. And they say that Paul plainly spoke for this reason: “And he is all things”; and again: “All things are to him, and from him are all things”; and again: “In him dwells all the fullness of the Godhead”; and that saying: “All things are summed up in Christ by God.” So they interpret these sayings and any others of the kind.

Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.

Luke 2:23 (quotation, high confidence) · Exod 13:2 (quotation, medium confidence) · Col 3:11 (quotation, medium confidence) · Rom 11:36 (quotation, high confidence) · Col 2:9 (quotation, high confidence) · Eph 1:10 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The Valentinians use texts about Christ as “all things” to show that the Saviour is the All.

  • Words lost in the scan of Harvey's edition are supplied from Stieren's edition. Quotations: Luke 2:23 (Exod 13:2); Col 3:11; Rom 11:36; Col 2:9; Eph 1:10.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR: Greek letters for 'Et'; OCR: digit for 'i'): ἘΠῚ rursus → Et rursus; ex 4pso → ex ipso.

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Irenaeus, Haer. 1.3.4 (Harvey 1:30; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/irenaeus-adversus-haereses/1-0-1/#p-1-3-4).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-irenaeus-adversus-haereses-1-3-4) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the ancient Latin translation as printed by Harvey (Cambridge, 1857), from the OCR of the printed edition with slips corrected as logged, in Massuet's section numbering; lines lost in the scan supplied from Stieren's edition (1848–53) where noted; each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation in ANF 1 (1885).

1.3.5Harvey 1:30–32

Adhuc etiam de Horo suo (quem etiam pluribus nominibus vocant) duas operationes habere eum ostendunt, confirmativam et separativam: et secundum id quidem, quod firmat et constabilit, Crucem esse; secundum id vero, quod dividit, Horon. Salvatorem autem sic manifestasse operationes ejus: et primo quidem confirmativam, in eo quod dicit: Qui non tollit crucem suam. et sequitur me, discipulus meus esse non potest. Et iterum: Tollens crucem, sequere me. Separativam autem in eo quod dieit: Non vent mittere pacem, sed gladium. Et Joannem dicunt hoc ipsum manifestasse, dicentem: Ventilabrum in manu ejus, emundare aream, et colliget frumentum in horreum suum, paleas autem comburet gni inexstinguibili; et per hzec operationem Hori significasse. Ventilabrum enim illud crucem interpretantur esse, quae scilice& consumit materialia omnia, quemadmodum paleas ignis: emundat autem eos qui salvantur, sicut ventilabrum triticum. Paulum autem Apostolum et ipsum reminisci hujus crucis dieunt sic: Verbum enim crucis tis qui pereunt stultitia est: its autem, qui salvantur, virtus Dei. Et iterum: Mihi autem non eveniat in ullo gloriari, nis in Christi cruce, per quem mihi mundus crucifivus est, et ego mundo.

They also show that their Horos (whom they call by several names) has two operations, a strengthening one and a separating one: in so far as he strengthens and makes firm he is the Cross; in so far as he divides, Horos. The Saviour, they say, showed his operations thus: first the strengthening one, when he says, “Whoever does not take up his cross and follow me cannot be my disciple”; and again, “Taking up the cross, follow me”; and the separating one when he says, “I have not come to bring peace but a sword.” And they say John showed the same thing when he said, “His winnowing fork is in his hand, to clear the threshing floor, and he will gather the wheat into his barn, but the chaff he will burn with unquenchable fire”; and that by this he signified the operation of Horos. For they interpret that winnowing fork to be the Cross, which consumes all material things, as fire consumes chaff, but cleanses those who are saved, as the winnowing fork cleanses the wheat. And they say that the apostle Paul himself also mentions this Cross thus: “For the word of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to those who are being saved it is the power of God”; and again: “But far be it from me to glory in anything except in the cross of Christ, through whom the world has been crucified to me, and I to the world.”

Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.

Luke 14:27 (quotation, high confidence) · Mark 10:21 (quotation, medium confidence) · Matt 10:34 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 3:17 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 1:18 (quotation, high confidence) · Gal 6:14 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Horos is said to have two powers, strengthening (as Cross) and separating (as Limit), which the Valentinians find in sayings of Jesus, John the Baptist, and Paul.

  • Quotations: Luke 14:27; Mark 10:21 (in the form found in some manuscripts); Matt 10:34; Luke 3:17 (Matt 3:12); 1 Cor 1:18; Gal 6:14.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR: digit for 'i'; OCR: stray mark for 'i'): $n horreum → in horreum; 4nexstinguibili → inexstinguibili.

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Irenaeus, Haer. 1.3.5 (Harvey 1:30–32; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/irenaeus-adversus-haereses/1-0-1/#p-1-3-5).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-irenaeus-adversus-haereses-1-3-5) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the ancient Latin translation as printed by Harvey (Cambridge, 1857), from the OCR of the printed edition with slips corrected as logged, in Massuet's section numbering; lines lost in the scan supplied from Stieren's edition (1848–53) where noted; each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation in ANF 1 (1885).

1.3.6Harvey 1:32

Talia igitur de Pleromate ipsorum, et plasmate universorum dicunt, adaptare cupientes ea que bene dicta sunt, iis quae male adinventa sunt ab ipsis. Et non solum autem ex Evangelicis et Apostolicis tentant ostensiones facere, convertentes interpretationes, et adulterantes expositiones: sed etiam ex Lege et Prophetis, cum multe: parabole et allegoriae sint dictae», et in multa trahi possint ambiguum per expositionem, propensius ad figmentum suum et dolose adaptantes, in captivitatem ducunt a veritate eos, qui non firmam fidem in unum Deum Patrem omnipotentem, et in unum Jesum Christum Filium Dei conservant.

Such things, then, they say about their Pleroma and the formation of the universe, wishing to adapt what was well said to what they have wickedly invented. And they try to draw proofs not only from the Gospels and the apostolic writings, twisting the interpretations and adulterating the expositions, but also from the Law and the Prophets: since many parables and allegories are spoken there, which can be drawn into many senses because of their ambiguity, they adapt them all the more readily and craftily to their fiction, and lead captive from the truth those who do not keep a firm faith in one God, the Father almighty, and in one Jesus Christ, the Son of God.

Notes and citation

Summary: The heretics twist the Gospels, the apostles, and the ambiguous parables of the Law and Prophets to fit their system.

  • “One God, the Father almighty, and one Jesus Christ, the Son of God” echoes the church's rule of faith (see 1.10.1).

Topics: Heresy, Scripture and canon

Cite (SBL): Irenaeus, Haer. 1.3.6 (Harvey 1:32; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/irenaeus-adversus-haereses/1-0-1/#p-1-3-6).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-irenaeus-adversus-haereses-1-3-6) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the ancient Latin translation as printed by Harvey (Cambridge, 1857), from the OCR of the printed edition with slips corrected as logged, in Massuet's section numbering; lines lost in the scan supplied from Stieren's edition (1848–53) where noted; each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation in ANF 1 (1885).

Against 1, chapter 4

1.4.1Harvey 1:32

Ea vero que extra Pleroma dicuntur ab iis, sunt talia: Enthymesin illius superioris Sophie, quam et Achamoth vocant, separatam a superiore Pleromate cum passione dicunt, in umbra et vacuitatis locis defervisse per necessitatem: extra enim lumen facta est, et extra Pleroma, informis et sine specie, quasi abortus, ideo quia nihil apprehendit. Misertum autem ejus superiorem Christum, et per crucem extensum, sua virtute formasse formam, qus esset, secundum subetantiam tantum, sed non secundum agnitionem: et hsec operatum recurrere subtrahentem suam virtutem, et reliquisse illam, uti sentiens passionem, que erga illam esset per separationem Pleromatis, concupiscat eorum que meliora essent, habens aliquam Sodorationem immortalitatis relictam in semetipsa a Christo et Spiritu sancto. Quapropter et ipsam duobus nominibus vocari, Sophiam paternaliter (Pater enim ejus Sophia vocatur) et Spiritum sanctum ab eo, qui est erga Christum Spiritus, Formatam autem eam et sensatam factam, statim autem evacuatam ab eo qui invisibiliter cum ea erat Verbo, hoc est Christo, in exquisitionem egressam ejus luminis, quod se dereliquisset; et non potuisse apprehendere illud, quoniam coércebatur ab Horo. Et sic Horon coércentem eam ne anterius irrueret, dixisse Jao, unde et Iao nomen factum dicunt: et cum non posset pertransire Horon, quoniam complexa fuerat passionem, et sola fuisset derelicta foris, omni parti passionis succubuisse multifari» et varie existentis: et passam eam, tristitiam quidem, quoniam non apprehendit, timorem autem, ne quemadmodum eam lumen, sic et vita relinqueret: consternationem autem super hec: [in] ignorantia autem omnia. Et non quemadmodum mater ejus prima Sophia Aon, demutationem in passionibus habuit, sed contrarietatem. Super hsc autem evenisse ei et alteram affectionem conversionis ad eum qui vivificavit.

What they say about the things outside the Pleroma is as follows. The Enthymesis (Intention) of that upper Sophia, whom they also call Achamoth, separated from the upper Pleroma with the passion, they say, necessarily boiled over in places of shadow and emptiness; for she had come to be outside the light and outside the Pleroma, formless and without shape, like an untimely birth, because she had grasped nothing. But the upper Christ took pity on her, and, stretched out through the Cross, by his own power gave her a form, the form that is according to substance only, not according to knowledge; and having done this he hurried back, withdrawing his power, and left her, so that, perceiving the passion that was hers through her separation from the Pleroma, she might long for the better things, having some fragrance of immortality left in herself by Christ and the Holy Spirit. For this reason she too is called by two names: Sophia, after her father (for her father is called Sophia), and Holy Spirit, from the Spirit who is with Christ. Having been formed and made conscious, but at once emptied of the Word who was invisibly with her, that is, Christ, she went out in search of the light that had left her, and could not grasp it, because she was held back by Horos. And so Horos, holding her back from rushing further, said “Iao”; hence, they say, the name Iao arose. And since she could not pass beyond Horos, because she was entangled in the passion, and had been left alone outside, she fell under every part of the passion, which is manifold and varied: she suffered grief, because she had not grasped it; fear, lest life should leave her as the light had; and bewilderment besides; and all these [in] ignorance. And not as her mother, the first Sophia, an Aeon, had change in her passions, but contrariety. Besides these, another state came upon her, that of turning back to him who had given her life.

Notes and citation

Summary: Sophia's Intention, called Achamoth, is cast outside the Pleroma, given form by Christ, and left to suffer grief, fear, and bewilderment.

  • Words that intruded from Harvey's notes (“Cum quo et Auctor noster istud com…”) are removed. “Iao” is a form of the divine name. The word in square brackets is Harvey's supplement.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (intrusion from Harvey's notes): concupiscat Cum quo et Auctor noster istud comeorum → concupiscat eorum.

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Irenaeus, Haer. 1.4.1 (Harvey 1:32; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/irenaeus-adversus-haereses/1-0-1/#p-1-4-1).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-irenaeus-adversus-haereses-1-4-1) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the ancient Latin translation as printed by Harvey (Cambridge, 1857), from the OCR of the printed edition with slips corrected as logged, in Massuet's section numbering; lines lost in the scan supplied from Stieren's edition (1848–53) where noted; each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation in ANF 1 (1885).

1.4.2Harvey 1:32–35

Eam collectionem et substantiam fuisse materie dicunt, ex qua hic mundus constat. De conversione enim mundi et Demiurgi omnem animam genesin accepisse: de timore autem et tristitia reliqua initium habuisse. A lacrymis enim ejus factam universam humidam substantiam: a risu autem lucidam: a tristitia autem et pavore corporalia mundi elementa. Aliquando enim plorabat et tristis erat, quomodo dicunt, quod derelicta sola esset in tenebris et in vacuo: aliquando autem in cogitationem veniens ejus quod dereliquerat eam lumen, diffundebatur et ridebat: aliquando autem rursus timebat: aliquando consternabatur, et ecstasin patiebatur.

This, they say, was the origin and substance of the matter from which this world consists. From her turning back every soul of the world and of the Demiurge took its origin; from her fear and grief the rest had their beginning. From her tears came all moist substance; from her laughter, the shining; from her grief and terror, the bodily elements of the world. For at times she wept and grieved, as they say, because she had been left alone in darkness and emptiness; at times, coming to think of the light that had left her, she was cheered and laughed; at times again she feared; at times she was bewildered and beside herself.

Notes and citation

Summary: From Achamoth's passions, tears, and laughter come the soul and the material elements of the world.

  • The Latin opens “Eam collectionem”; the Greek has “This was the origin (genesis)”.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR: Greek letter for 'a'): ἃ risu → a risu.

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Irenaeus, Haer. 1.4.2 (Harvey 1:32–35; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/irenaeus-adversus-haereses/1-0-1/#p-1-4-2).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-irenaeus-adversus-haereses-1-4-2) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the ancient Latin translation as printed by Harvey (Cambridge, 1857), from the OCR of the printed edition with slips corrected as logged, in Massuet's section numbering; lines lost in the scan supplied from Stieren's edition (1848–53) where noted; each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation in ANF 1 (1885).

1.4.3Harvey 1:35

Et quidem enim tragcedia multa est jam hie, et phantasia uniuscujusque illorum, aliter et aliter graviter exponentis, ex quali passione, et ex quali elemento substantia generationem accepit. Que etiam convenienter videntur mihi non omnes velle in manifesto docere, sed solos illos qui etiam grandes mercedes pro talibus mysteriis prastare possunt. Non enim jam dicunt similia illis, de quibus Dominus noster dixit: Gratis accepistis, gratis date: sed separata et portentuosa, et alta mysteria cum magno labore exquisita fallacibus. Quis enim non eroget omnia quo» sunt ejus, uti discat, quoniam a lacrymis Enthymeseos, qu; est ex passione /Eonis, maria et fontes, et flumina, et universa humida materia generationem acceperunt: de risu autem ejus lumen, de pavore autem et inconstabilitate corporalia mundi elementa?

And indeed there is much tragedy here, and each of them fancies something different, expounding pompously in one way or another from what passion and from what element the substance took its origin. It seems to me fitting that they do not all want to teach these things openly, but only to those who can pay large fees for such mysteries. For what they say is no longer like that of which our Lord said, “Freely you have received, freely give,” but secret, portentous, and profound mysteries, sought out with great labour by deceivers. For who would not spend all he has to learn that from the tears of the Enthymesis, which came from the passion of the Aeon, the seas, springs, rivers, and all moist matter took their origin; from her laughter, light; and from her terror and instability, the bodily elements of the world?

Matt 10:8 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Irenaeus mocks the paid secret teaching that the seas came from Achamoth's tears and light from her laughter.

  • Quotation: Matt 10:8. Harvey's bracketed alternative reading (“Ecquid enim”) is removed as note debris.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (Harvey's note on an alternative reading, with line number, removed): [Ecquid enim 5] → .

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Irenaeus, Haer. 1.4.3 (Harvey 1:35; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/irenaeus-adversus-haereses/1-0-1/#p-1-4-3).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-irenaeus-adversus-haereses-1-4-3) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the ancient Latin translation as printed by Harvey (Cambridge, 1857), from the OCR of the printed edition with slips corrected as logged, in Massuet's section numbering; lines lost in the scan supplied from Stieren's edition (1848–53) where noted; each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation in ANF 1 (1885).

1.4.4Harvey 1:35–38

Volo autem aliquid et ego conferre fructificationi eorum. Quoniam enim video dulees quidem quasdam aquas, ut fontes, et flumina, et imbres, et talia; que autem sunt in mari salsas: adinvenio non omnia a lacrymis ejus emissa, quoniam lacryme salse sunt qualitate. Manifestum igitur, quoniam salse aque sunt he a lacrymis. Opinor autem eam in agonia et in inconstantia grandi eonstitutam et sudasse. Unde etiam secundum argumentationem ipsorum suspicari oportet, fontes et flumina, et qus sunt alis aquse dulces, generationem habuisse a sudoribus ejus. Non est enim suadibile, cum sint unius qualitatis lacryme, alteras quidem salsas, alteras dulces aquas ex iis exisse. Hoc autem magis suadibile, alteras quidem esse a lacrymis, alteras vero a sudoribus. Quoniam autem et calide et austere quedam sunt aque in mundo, intelligere debes, quid faciens, et ex quo membro emisit has. Apti sunt enim hujusmodi fructus argumento ipsorum.

I too want to contribute something to their fruitfulness. Since I see that some waters are fresh, such as springs, rivers, rains, and the like, and that those in the sea are salt, I find that not all were emitted from her tears, since tears are salt in quality. It is clear, then, that the salt waters are those from the tears. But I suppose that, placed in agony and great distress, she also sweated. Hence, following their reasoning, one must suppose that the springs and rivers and whatever other fresh waters there are had their origin from her sweat. For it is not credible that, tears being of one quality, salt waters and fresh should both have come from them. This is more credible: that some are from the tears, others from the sweat. And since there are also some hot and acrid waters in the world, you must work out what she was doing and from what member she emitted these. Such fruits suit their argument.

Notes and citation

Summary: Irenaeus parodies the system by suggesting that fresh water came from Achamoth's sweat and hot springs from some other part of her.

  • Irenaeus is being ironic throughout this section.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (stray digits): et 81 qus → et qus.

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Irenaeus, Haer. 1.4.4 (Harvey 1:35–38; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/irenaeus-adversus-haereses/1-0-1/#p-1-4-4).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-irenaeus-adversus-haereses-1-4-4) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the ancient Latin translation as printed by Harvey (Cambridge, 1857), from the OCR of the printed edition with slips corrected as logged, in Massuet's section numbering; lines lost in the scan supplied from Stieren's edition (1848–53) where noted; each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation in ANF 1 (1885).

1.4.5Harvey 1:38–41

Cum igitur peragrasset omnem passionem mater ipsorum, et vix cum elata esset, ad obsecrationem conversa est ejus luminis, quod dereliquerat eam, hoc est, Christi, dicunt: qui regressus in Pleroma, ipse quidem, ut datur intelligi, pigritatus est secundo descendere: Paracletum autem misit ad eam, hoc est, Salvatorem, praestante ei virtutem omnem a Patre, et omnia sub potestate tradente: et /Eonibus autem similiter, uti in eo omnia conderentur, visibilia et inrisibilia, throni, divinitates, dominationes. Mittitur autem ad eam cum costaneis suis Angelis. Hanc autem Achamoth reveritam eum dicunt primo quidem coopertionem imposuisse propter reverentiam: deinde autem cum vidisset eum cum universa fructificatione sua, accurrisse el, virtute accepta de visu ejus. Et illum formasse eam formationem, qus est secundum agnitionem, et curationem passionum fecisse ejus, separantem eas ab ea, et non eas neglexisse, neo enim erat possibile eas exterminari quemadmodum prioris, eo quod jam habilia et possibilia essent; sed segregantem separatim commiscuisse et coagulasse, et de incorporali passione in incorporalem materiam transtulisse eas: et sic aptabilitatem et naturam fecisse in eis, ut in congregationes et corpora venirent, uti fierent dux substantiae, una quidem mala ex passionibus, altera autem conversionis passibilis: et propter hoc virtute Salvatorem fabricasse dicunt. Hanc autem Achamoth extra passionem factam concepisse de gratulatione eorum, qux» cum eo sunt luminum visionem, id est, Angelorum qui erant cum eo, et delectatam in conspectu [conceptu] eorum peperisse fructus secundum illius imaginem docent, partum spiritalem secundum similitudinem factum satellitum Salvatoris.

When their mother had gone through every passion and had with difficulty raised herself, she turned, they say, to entreat the light that had left her, that is, Christ. He, having returned into the Pleroma, was, as one may gather, unwilling to come down a second time, but sent to her the Paraclete, that is, the Saviour, the Father giving him all power and handing all things over to his authority, and the Aeons likewise, so that in him all things might be founded, visible and invisible, thrones, divinities, dominions. He is sent to her with his fellow angels. Achamoth, they say, in awe of him, first put on a veil out of reverence; then, when she saw him with all his fruitfulness, she ran to him, receiving power from the sight of him. And he formed her with the formation that is according to knowledge, and healed her passions, separating them from her. He did not neglect them, for it was not possible for them to be done away with as those of the former had been, because they had already become settled and powerful; but setting them apart, he mixed and solidified them, and changed them from incorporeal passion into incorporeal matter. And so he gave them aptitude and a nature to come together into compounds and bodies, so that two substances came into being, one evil, from the passions, the other passible, from the turning back. And for this reason they say that the Saviour was in power the maker. Achamoth, freed from passion, conceived from joy at the sight of the lights that are with him, that is, of the angels who were with him; and, delighted at the sight [conception] of them, she bore fruits according to their image, they teach, a spiritual offspring made in the likeness of the Saviour's bodyguards.

Col 1:16 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Christ sends the Saviour, who gives Achamoth knowledge and turns her passions into matter; she then conceives spiritual offspring from the sight of his angels.

  • Quotation: Col 1:16. A margin reference (Col 1) is removed. The word in square brackets is Harvey's alternative reading.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR: stray mark for 'a'; margin reference debris (Col 1)): omnem " Patre → omnem a Patre; uti CoLL1& $n eo → uti in eo.

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Irenaeus, Haer. 1.4.5 (Harvey 1:38–41; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/irenaeus-adversus-haereses/1-0-1/#p-1-4-5).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-irenaeus-adversus-haereses-1-4-5) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the ancient Latin translation as printed by Harvey (Cambridge, 1857), from the OCR of the printed edition with slips corrected as logged, in Massuet's section numbering; lines lost in the scan supplied from Stieren's edition (1848–53) where noted; each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation in ANF 1 (1885).