On the Trinity 11.19–11.41
Latin text: Migne, PL 10 (Latin text: Migne, Patrologia Latina, digitized by Open Greek and Latin (patrologia_latina-dev, University of Leipzig), CC BY-SA 4.0).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0). Compare: Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, series 2, vol. 9 (1899).
Chapter 11
11.19PL 10:413a–414b
Caeterum cum in principio apud Deum erat Deus Verbum, non habet ullam aut causam aut enarrationem naturae ejus unctio, quae nihil aliud quam esse in principio nuntiatur. Neque habuit sane ungendi se per spiritum et virtutem Dei necessitatem Deus: qui Dei et Spiritus esset et Virtus. Ungitur ergo Deus a Deo suo prae consortibus suis. Et si ante dispensationem carnis plures ex lege sunt Christi; Christus nunc, qui prae participibus ungitur, posterior in tempore est, dum unctis participibus antefertur. Denique ille prophetiae sermo posteriorem unctionem hanc, quae in tempore esset, ostendit dicens: Dilexisti justitiam, et odisti iniquitatem; propterea unxit te, Deus, Deus tuus oleo exsultationis prae consortibus tuis. Consequens et posterior causa numquam refertur ut prior sit: quia meruisse aliquid, posterius est, quam esse qui possit mereri. Mereri enim ejus est, qui sibi ipsi meriti acquirendi auctor exsistat. Si igitur nativitati unigeniti Dei unctionem deputabimus, quae unctio oblmeritum dilectae justitiae et perosae iniquitatis indulta sit; provectus potius per unctionem unigenitus Deus, quam genitus intelligetur: jamque per incrementa et profectus Deus consummabitur, qui non natus Deus sit, sed in Deum sit unctus ex merito; et jam per causam erit Deus Christus, et non omnis causa per Deum Christum. Et ubi illud Apostoli erit: Omnia per ipsum, et in ipso, et ipse est ante omnes, et omnia ipsi constant? Deus enim Dominus Jesus Christus, non ob aliqua, neque per aliqua Deus est; sed Deus natus est. Et qui ex generatione Deus est, non post nativitatem in Deum per causam profecit: sed in eo, quod natus est, nibil aliud est nascendo, quam Deus est. Cum vero ungitur ex causa; nou ad id, quod incremento nou eget, spectat unctionis profectus, sed ad id, quod per incrementum sacramenti profectu eguit unctionis, id est, ut per unctionem sanctificatus homo noster Christus exsisteret. Si igitur nunc quoque per prophetam servi dispensatio demonstratur, ob quam a Deo suo prae participibus ungitur; et propterea, quia justitiam dilexerit et iniquitatem oderit, ungatur: cur prophetae sermo non ad eam Christi naturam pertinebit, in qua ei sunt ex carnis assumptione participes? cum praesertim ita se prophetiae Spiritus temperaverit, ut dum Deus a Deo suo ungitur, sit ei et in dispensatione unctionis quod Deus suus est, et in natura quod Deus est. Deus igitur ungitur: sed quaero an id, quod in principio Deus erat Verbum, unctum sit? Non utique; nam posterior Deo unctio est. Et cum non ea Verbi nativitas, quod in principio apud Deum Deus erat, uncta sit; id in Deo necesse est ungatur, quod posterius sit in dispensatione qua Deus est. Et cum Deus a Deo suo ungitur; id ungitur, quidquid ab eo in mysterio carnis servile susceptum est.
But since in the beginning God the Word was with God, anointing has no cause or account in his nature, which is announced as nothing other than being in the beginning. Nor did God surely need to be anointed with the Spirit and power of God, he who was himself the Spirit and Power of God. God, then, is anointed by his God above his fellows. And if before the dispensation of the flesh there were many christs from the law, the Christ who is now anointed above his fellows is later in time, while he is preferred to the anointed fellows. In fact, that word of prophecy shows this anointing to be later, coming in time, saying: "You have loved righteousness and hated iniquity; therefore God, your God, has anointed you with the oil of gladness above your fellows." A consequent and later cause is never referred to as prior; because to have deserved something comes after being one who can deserve. For to deserve belongs to one who is himself the author of acquiring his desert. If, then, we ascribe to the birth of the only-begotten God an anointing granted for the merit of loving righteousness and hating iniquity, the only-begotten God will be understood rather as promoted through anointing than as begotten; and then God will be completed by increases and advances, being not born God but anointed into God by merit; and then Christ will be God through a cause, and not every cause through Christ God. And where will the apostle's saying be: "All things through him and in him, and he is before all, and all things hold together in him"? For the Lord Jesus Christ is God not on account of anything, nor through anything; he was born God. And he who is God by generation did not advance into God through a cause after his birth; but in being born he is, by being born, nothing other than God. But when he is anointed for a cause, the advance of anointing does not regard what needs no increase, but what, through the increase of the mystery, needed the advance of anointing; that is, that our man, Christ, might come to exist sanctified through anointing. If, then, now too the dispensation of the servant is shown through the prophet, for which he is anointed by his God above his fellows, and he is anointed because he loved righteousness and hated iniquity, why will the prophet's word not pertain to that nature of Christ in which he has fellows from the taking up of flesh? Especially since the Spirit of prophecy so tempered itself that, while God is anointed by his God, he has both, in the dispensation of anointing, his God, and, in nature, his being God. God, then, is anointed; but I ask whether that which in the beginning was God the Word was anointed? Not at all; for the anointing is later than God. And since the birth of the Word, by which in the beginning he was God with God, was not anointed, what must be anointed in God is what is later in the dispensation by which he is God. And when God is anointed by his God, what is anointed is whatever servile thing was taken up by him in the mystery of the flesh.
Ps 45:7 (44:8 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · Heb 1:9 (allusion, medium confidence) · Col 1:16 (quotation, high confidence) · Col 1:17 (quotation, high confidence) · John 1:1 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 1:24 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The anointing of Ps 45:7, given for a merit and later in time, applies to Christ's assumed humanity, not to God the Word born in the beginning.
- Quotations: Ps 45:7 (Vulgate 44:8; Heb 1:9); Col 1:16–17; allusions: John 1:1; 1 Cor 1:24.
Topics: Christology
Cite (SBL): Hilary, Trin. 11.19 (PL 10:413a–414b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/hilary-trinitate/11-19/#p-11-19). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-hilary-trinitate-11-19) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 10 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF² 9 (Watson and Pullan, 1899); differences checked against the Latin.
11.20PL 10:414b
Nemo igitur magnae pietatis sacramentum, quod manifestatum in carne est, sensu impio violet, nec se quisquam Unigenito per substantiam divinitatis exaequet. Sit nobis ille et frater et particeps secundum quod Verbum caro facium habitavit in nobis, secundum quod Mediator Dei atque hominum homo Jesus Christus est. Sit nobis secundum servos et communis pater et communis Deus: et prae participibus unctus sit in ea natura, cum privilegio licet unctus, qua participes unguntur. Sit in Mediatoris sacramento, ut homo verus, ita et Deus verus, Deus ipse ex Deo, communem nobiscum habens patrem et Deum in ea communione qua frater est.
Let no one, then, violate with impious sense the mystery of great piety which was manifested in the flesh, and let no one make himself equal to the Only-begotten in the substance of divinity. Let him be to us both brother and fellow, according as the Word made flesh dwelt among us, according as the man Jesus Christ is the Mediator of God and men. Let him have with us, as servants, a common Father and a common God; and let him be anointed above his fellows in that nature, though anointed with privilege, in which the fellows are anointed. Let him be, in the mystery of the Mediator, as true man, so also true God, God himself from God, having a common Father and God with us in that fellowship in which he is brother.
1 Tim 3:16 (allusion, high confidence) · John 1:14 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Tim 2:5 (allusion, high confidence) · Ps 45:7 (44:8 Vulg.) (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Christ is our brother and fellow in the flesh, sharing our Father and God as man, while remaining true God from God.
- Allusions: 1 Tim 3:16; John 1:14; 1 Tim 2:5; Ps 45:7.
Topics: Christology
Cite (SBL): Hilary, Trin. 11.20 (PL 10:414b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/hilary-trinitate/11-19/#p-11-20). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-hilary-trinitate-11-20) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 10 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF² 9 (Watson and Pullan, 1899); differences checked against the Latin.
11.21PL 10:414c
Sed forte subjectio illa, regnique traditio, deinde finis, aut naturae abolitio aut potestatis defectio aut divinitatis infirmitas sit intelligenda. Plerique enim ita volunt, ut aut dum subjectis omnibus Deo subjicitur, per conditionem subjectionis Deus non sit; aut dum regnum tradit, nou sit in regno; aut dum finis est, finem ejus defectio consequatur.
But perhaps that subjection, and the handing over of the kingdom, and then the end, are to be understood as either an abolition of nature, a failure of power, or a weakness of divinity. For many hold that either, since he is subjected to God when all things have been subjected, he is not God by the condition of subjection; or, since he hands over the kingdom, he is not in the kingdom; or, since there is an end, failure follows his end.
1 Cor 15:24 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:28 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Some take the subjection, handing over of the kingdom, and end in 1 Cor 15:24–28 as loss of the Son's divinity or rule.
- Allusions: 1 Cor 15:24, 28.
Topics: Christology, Eschatology, Heresy
Cite (SBL): Hilary, Trin. 11.21 (PL 10:414c; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/hilary-trinitate/11-19/#p-11-21). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-hilary-trinitate-11-21) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 10 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF² 9 (Watson and Pullan, 1899); differences checked against the Latin.
11.22PL 10:414c–415b
Congruum itaque est, omnem super his apostolici sermonis sensum pertractare: ut singulorum quorumque dictorum ratione exposita atque edita, sacramenti totius capaces per universitatis intelligentiam praebeamur. Ait itaque: Quoniam enim per hominem mors, et per hominem resurrectio mortuorum. Quomodo enim in Adam omnes moriuntur, sic et in Christo omnes vivificantur. Unusquisque autem in suo ordine, primitiae Christus, deinde hi qui sunt Christi, qui in adventu ejus: deinde finis, cum tradiderit regnum Deo et Patri, cum evacuaverit omnem magistratum et omnem potestatem. Oportet enim illum regnare, donec ponat omnes inimicos sub pedibus suis. Deus enim omnia subjecit sub pedibus ejus, Novissima inimica devicta est ab eo mors. Cum autem dixerit, Omnia subjecta sunt, absque eo qui illi subjecit omnia. Cum autem subjecta fuerint ei omnia, tunc ipse subjectus erit illi, qui subjecit ei omnia, ut sit Deus omnia in omnibus.
It is fitting, then, to go through the whole sense of the apostle's speech on these things, so that, the reason of each several saying being set out and made plain, we may show ourselves capable of the whole mystery through understanding the whole. He says, then: "For since by a man came death, by a man also the resurrection of the dead. For as in Adam all die, so also in Christ all are made alive. But each in his own order: Christ the firstfruits, then those who are Christ's, at his coming; then the end, when he hands over the kingdom to God and the Father, when he has made void every rule and every power. For he must reign until he puts all enemies under his feet. For God has subjected all things under his feet. The last enemy, death, has been conquered by him. But when he says, All things are subjected, it is evident that he is excepted who subjected all things to him. And when all things are subjected to him, then he himself will be subjected to him who subjected all things to him, that God may be all in all."
1 Cor 15:21 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:22 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:23 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:24 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:25 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:26 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:27 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:28 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 110:1 (109:1 Vulg.) (allusion, medium confidence) · Ps 8:6 (8:8 Vulg.) (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Hilary quotes 1 Cor 15:21–28 in full.
- Quotation: 1 Cor 15:21–28, with Ps 110:1 and Ps 8:6 within it. "The last enemy … has been conquered" follows Hilary's Latin (devicta est).
Topics: Christology, Eschatology
Cite (SBL): Hilary, Trin. 11.22 (PL 10:414c–415b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/hilary-trinitate/11-19/#p-11-22). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-hilary-trinitate-11-22) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 10 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF² 9 (Watson and Pullan, 1899); differences checked against the Latin.
11.23PL 10:415b–416a
Coelestium dispensationum arcana Apostolus non ab hominibus, neque per hominem, sed per Jesum Christum electus gentium magister, quanta potest absoluti sermonis significatione demonstrat. Et qui inenarranda usque ad tertium coelum raptus audisset, ea tantum, quorum natura humana capax esset, sensui humanae intelligentiae revelavit: non ignorans tamen quaedam non statim posse atque audiuntur intelligi, quia infirmitas nostra serius in verum atque absolutum mentis judicium ea, quae in aures transfunderentur, acciperet; longiore ad cunctandum mora sensui potius quam auditui derelicta, cum et audisse vocis sit, et intellexisse rationis, Deo tamen intelligentiae cupidis intelligentiam revelante. Namque ad Timotheum per aviae ac matris gloriosam fidem sacris ab infantia litteris institutum scribens plurima, hoc quoque addidit: Intellige quae dico, dabit enim tibi Deus in omnibus intellectum. Admonitio intelligendi ex difficultate intelligentiae est. Intelligentiae vero a Deo donum, fidei munus est, per quam infirmitas sensus gratiam revelationis meretur. Si ergo Timotheus apostolico testimonio homo Dei, et legitimus Paulo secundum fidem filius, ut intelligat admonetur, quia ei Dominus intelligentiam in omnibus sit daturus; nos quoque admoneri per Apostolum ad intelligentiam meminerimus, scientes Dominum nobis intelligentiam omnium praestiturum.
The apostle, chosen teacher of the Gentiles not by men nor through man but through Jesus Christ, shows the secrets of the heavenly dispensations with as much meaning of complete speech as he can. And he who, caught up to the third heaven, had heard things unspeakable, revealed to the sense of human understanding only those things of which human nature was capable; not unaware, however, that some things cannot at once be understood as they are heard, because our weakness would receive more slowly into the true and complete judgment of the mind what was poured into the ears; a longer time for pondering being left to the sense rather than to the hearing, since hearing belongs to the voice, understanding to reason, though God reveals understanding to those eager for it. For writing many things to Timothy, instructed in the holy letters from infancy through the glorious faith of his grandmother and mother, he also added this: "Understand what I say, for God will give you understanding in all things." The warning to understand arises from the difficulty of understanding. But the gift of understanding from God is the reward of faith, through which the weakness of sense earns the grace of revelation. If, then, Timothy, by the apostle's testimony a man of God and Paul's lawful son according to the faith, is warned to understand because the Lord will give him understanding in all things, let us remember that we too are warned by the apostle toward understanding, knowing that the Lord will grant us understanding of all things.
Gal 1:1 (allusion, high confidence) · 2 Cor 12:2 (allusion, high confidence) · 2 Cor 12:4 (allusion, high confidence) · 2 Tim 1:5 (allusion, high confidence) · 2 Tim 3:15 (allusion, high confidence) · 2 Tim 2:7 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Tim 6:11 (allusion, medium confidence) · 1 Tim 1:2 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Paul, who heard things unspeakable, warns Timothy to understand, trusting God to give understanding (2 Tim 2:7); so must we.
- Quotation: 2 Tim 2:7; allusions: Gal 1:1; 2 Cor 12:2–4; 2 Tim 1:5; 3:15; 1 Tim 1:2; 6:11.
Topics: Scripture and canon
Cite (SBL): Hilary, Trin. 11.23 (PL 10:415b–416a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/hilary-trinitate/11-19/#p-11-23). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-hilary-trinitate-11-23) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 10 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF² 9 (Watson and Pullan, 1899); differences checked against the Latin.
11.24PL 10:416a–417b
Et si forte humanae conditionis errore praesumptum aliquid sensu tenebimus, profectum intelligentiae per revelationis gratiam non recusemus: Ne intellexisse aliquid semel suo sensu ad id valeat, ut pudeat rectius aliquid demutando sentire. Ob quod prudenter consulteque moderandum haec ad Philippenses quoque idem beatus Apostolus scribit: Quotquot ergo perfecti sumus, haec sentiamus: et si quid aliter sentitis, id quoque Deus vobis revelabit. Verum in quo festinavimus, in ipso ingrediamur. Non praejudicat sensus anterior Dei revelationi. Nam Apostolus monuit in quo sapiant, qui sapiunt perfecte: et his qui aliter sapiunt revelationem Dei, ut id quod perfectum est sapiant, exspectat. Si qui ergo profundam hanc arcanae scientiae dispensationem aliter intellexerunt, et per nos rectum aliquid et probabile afferetur; non pudeat eos secundum Apostolum per revelationem Dei sapere perfecte: Neque magis ament veritatem nescisse quam oderint permansisse non veris. Eos enim, qui aliter sapiunt, et quibus id Deus revelavit, monet in id festinare, in quo ingressi fuerint: ut relicto primae ignorantiae sensu, secundum propositae festinationis ingressum, revelationem perfectae intelligentiae consequantur. Ingrediamur itaque in quo festinavimus. Et si forte festinationem nostram devii itineris error moratur; per revelationem tamen Dei in id quod festinavimus rursum ingressi, festinationis nostrae non demutemus ingressum. Festinavimus enim ad Christum Jesum Dominum gloriae et regem aeternorum saeculorum, in quo restaurata sunt omnia in coelis et in terra, cui constant omnia, in quo et cum quo semper manebimus. In his ergo ingressi sapimus perfecte: et si quid aliter sapimus, Deus nobis id quod perfecte sapitur revelabit. Itaque secundum apostolicam fidem sacramentum dictorum praesentium retractemus; et eo modo, quo superius a nobis tractata sunt omnia, ut omnem impiae voluntatis sensum sub dictis apostolicis praeceptum ex ipsa fidei apostolicae veritate prodamus.
And if perhaps, through the error of the human condition, we hold some presumption in our sense, let us not refuse progress in understanding through the grace of revelation, lest having once understood something by one's own sense should prevail so far that one is ashamed to think more rightly by changing. For this reason, to be governed prudently and wisely, the same blessed apostle also writes this to the Philippians: "As many of us, then, as are perfect, let us think this; and if in anything you think otherwise, God will reveal that also to you. Only, in what we have hastened toward, in that let us walk." An earlier view does not prejudge God's revelation. For the apostle told those who are perfectly wise what to think; and for those who think otherwise he waits for God's revelation, that they may think what is perfect. If, then, any have understood this deep dispensation of secret knowledge otherwise, and something right and acceptable is brought forward by us, let them not be ashamed, according to the apostle, to be perfectly wise through God's revelation; nor let them love more not to have known the truth than they hate having remained in what is untrue. For those who think otherwise, and to whom God has revealed it, he urges to hasten in that toward which they had set out; so that, leaving the sense of first ignorance, according to the setting out of the proposed haste, they may attain the revelation of perfect understanding. Let us walk, then, in what we have hastened toward. And if perhaps the error of a devious road delays our haste, yet, setting out again by God's revelation toward what we hastened to, let us not change the course of our haste. For we have hastened to Christ Jesus, the Lord of glory and King of the eternal ages, in whom all things in heaven and on earth have been restored, in whom all things hold together, in whom and with whom we shall always abide. Setting out in these, then, we think perfectly; and if in anything we think otherwise, God will reveal to us what is perfectly thought. Let us, then, according to the apostolic faith, go over again the mystery of the present sayings, and in the same way as all things were treated by us above, so that we may bring to light, from the very truth of the apostolic faith, every sense of impious will captured under the apostolic sayings.
Phil 3:15 (quotation, high confidence) · Phil 3:16 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 2:8 (allusion, medium confidence) · 1 Tim 1:17 (allusion, medium confidence) · Eph 1:10 (allusion, high confidence) · Col 1:17 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Following Phil 3:15–16, Hilary invites those who have understood 1 Cor 15 otherwise to accept a better understanding as God reveals it.
- Quotation: Phil 3:15–16 (in Hilary's Latin form); allusions: 1 Cor 2:8; 1 Tim 1:17; Eph 1:10; Col 1:17.
Topics: Scripture and canon
Cite (SBL): Hilary, Trin. 11.24 (PL 10:416a–417b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/hilary-trinitate/11-19/#p-11-24). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-hilary-trinitate-11-24) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 10 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF² 9 (Watson and Pullan, 1899); differences checked against the Latin.
11.25PL 10:417b
Tria igitur secundum dictorum ordinem in questionem vocantur, primum finis, deinde traditio, deinde subjectio: ut per haec aut desinat Christus in fine, aut regnum tradendo non teneat, aut extra Dei naturam Deo subjectus exsistat.
Three things, then, according to the order of the sayings, are called into question: first the end, then the handing over, then the subjection; so that through these either Christ ceases at the end, or, by handing over the kingdom, does not hold it, or exists outside the nature of God, being subject to God.
1 Cor 15:24 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:28 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Hilary names the three points in dispute: the end, the handing over of the kingdom, and the subjection.
Topics: Christology, Eschatology
Cite (SBL): Hilary, Trin. 11.25 (PL 10:417b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/hilary-trinitate/11-19/#p-11-25). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-hilary-trinitate-11-25) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 10 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF² 9 (Watson and Pullan, 1899); differences checked against the Latin.
11.26PL 10:417b–417c
Ac primum noscendum est, non hunc ordinem apostolicae esse doctrinae. Primum enim regni traditio est, deinde subjectio, postremo finis. Sed singulis quibusque causis propria quarumque causarum genera subjecta sunt: ut dum res singulae in res alias desinant, habeat semper subjacentem sibi causam causa praecedens. Finis enim erit; sed cum tradiderit regnum Deo. Tradet autem regnum; sed cum evacuaverit omnem magistratum et omnem potestatem. Evacuabit autem omnem magistratum et potestatem, quia oportet cum regnare. Regnabit autem, donec ponat omnes inimicos sub pedibus suis. Ponet vero inimicos sub pedibus suis; quia Deus ei subjecit omnia sub pedibus ejus. Subjecit autem Deus ita, ut novissima ab eo mors inimica vincatur. Dehinc subjectis omnibus ei, praeter eum qui subjecit ei omnia; tunc subjicietur ipse subjicienti sibi omnia. Subjectionis vero causa non alia est, quam ut sit Deus omnia in omnibus. Finis itaque est, esse Deum omnia in omnibus.
And first we must recognize that this is not the order of the apostle's teaching. For first comes the handing over of the kingdom, then the subjection, last the end. But to each of the several causes the proper kinds of each cause are subjoined, so that, while each thing ends in another, the preceding cause always has a cause underlying it. For the end will be, but when he has handed over the kingdom to God. He will hand over the kingdom, but when he has made void every rule and every power. He will make void every rule and power because he must reign. He will reign until he puts all enemies under his feet. He will put the enemies under his feet because God has subjected all things under his feet. God subjected them in such a way that death, the last enemy, is conquered by him. Then, all things being subjected to him except him who subjected all things to him, he himself will then be subjected to him who subjects all things to him. The cause of the subjection is nothing other than that God may be all in all. The end, then, is that God be all in all.
1 Cor 15:24 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:25 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:26 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:27 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:28 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: In Paul's order the kingdom is handed over, then the Son is subjected, and the end is that God may be all in all.
- Allusions: 1 Cor 15:24–28.
Topics: Christology, Eschatology
Cite (SBL): Hilary, Trin. 11.26 (PL 10:417b–417c; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/hilary-trinitate/11-19/#p-11-26). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-hilary-trinitate-11-26) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 10 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF² 9 (Watson and Pullan, 1899); differences checked against the Latin.
11.27PL 10:417d
Et quaerendum nunc ante omnia est, an finis defectio sit, an traditio amissio sit, an subjectio infirmitas sit. Quae si his sibi contrariis non subjacebunt, erunt in ea intelligentiae veritate qua dicta sunt.
And we must now ask before all else whether the end is a failing, whether the handing over is a loss, whether the subjection is weakness. If these are not subject to these contraries, they will be in that truth of understanding in which they were said.
Notes and citation
Summary: Hilary asks whether the end means failure, handing over means loss, and subjection means weakness.
Topics: Christology, Eschatology
Cite (SBL): Hilary, Trin. 11.27 (PL 10:417d; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/hilary-trinitate/11-19/#p-11-27). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-hilary-trinitate-11-27) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 10 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF² 9 (Watson and Pullan, 1899); differences checked against the Latin.
11.28PL 10:418a–418c
Finis itaque legis Christus est: et quaero utrum abolitio legis Christus sit, anne perfectio? Sed si legem Christus, qui finis ejus est, non dissolvit, sed adimplet, secundum quod ait: Non veni legem solvere, sed adimplere; finis non defectio est, sed consummata perfectio. Tendunt enim ad finem omnia, non ut non sint, sed uti in eo, ad quod tetenderint, maneant. Et propter finem omnia; caeterum finis ad aliud aliquid non refertur. Sed cum finis omnia sit, manens ipse sibi totus est. Et quia non excedens ex sese ulli alii tempori aut rei potius quam sibi proficit; ad finem ipsum semper intentio spei omnis extenditur. Et idcirco Dominus religiosae fidei patientiam fini se reservantem, ita adhortatur: Beatus qui permanserit usque in finem, non utique ut sit beata defectio, et non esse sit fructus, et merces fidei sui cujusque constituatur abolitio: sed quia finis propositae beatitudinis inexcessus modus est, beati sunt qui usque ad finem consummandae beatitudinis manserint, non ultra se fidelis spei exspectatione tendente. Finis itaque est manendi immobilis ad quem tenditur status. Denique Apostolus impietatis finem ad desinendi metum praemonens, ait: Quorum finis est interitus, nostra autem exspectatio in coelis est. Si itaque et beatis et impiis finis est, et finis intelligitur esse defectio: religionem atque impietatem finis exaequat, quia utrumque per constitutum finem sit in commune non esse. Et ubi exspectatio nostra in coelis est, si per finem esse secundum impios desinamus? Quod si sanctis exspectatio, impiis vero finis debitus esse dicitur: tamen ne sic quidem finis creditur esse defectio; quia quae poena impietatis est, omnino non esse ad poenarum ultricium sensum, causa in his per defectionem sui non exstante patiendi? Finis itaque est indemutandae constitutionis mansura perfectio: quae et beatitudini reservata, et impietati est praeparata.
Christ is the end of the law; and I ask whether Christ is the abolition of the law or its perfection? But if Christ, who is its end, does not destroy the law but fulfils it, according to what he says, "I have not come to destroy the law but to fulfil it," the end is not a failing but completed perfection. For all things tend to an end, not so as not to be, but so as to abide in that toward which they have tended. And all things are for the end; but the end is not referred to anything else. But since the end is all things, it abides wholly itself to itself. And because, not going out from itself, it serves no other time or thing rather than itself, the intention of all hope always stretches toward the end itself. And therefore the Lord encourages the patience of a religious faith that reserves itself for the end, thus: "Blessed is he who endures to the end"; not, surely, so that failing is blessed, and not being is the fruit, and the reward of each one's faith is set as abolition; but because the end is the unsurpassed measure of the proposed blessedness, they are blessed who have endured to the end of a blessedness to be completed, the expectation of faithful hope not stretching beyond it. The end, then, is the unmoving state of abiding toward which one tends. In fact, the apostle, warning beforehand of the end of impiety to inspire fear of ceasing, says: "Whose end is destruction; but our expectation is in heaven." If, then, there is an end both for the blessed and for the impious, and the end is understood to be a failing, the end makes religion and impiety equal, since through the appointed end both would alike cease to be. And where is our expectation in heaven, if through the end we cease to be, like the impious? But if expectation is said to be due to the saints and an end to the impious, not even so is the end believed to be a failing; for what punishment of impiety is it not to be at all, for the sense of avenging punishments, when in them, through their failing, there would be no cause of suffering? The end, then, is the abiding perfection of an unchangeable condition, which is both reserved for blessedness and prepared for impiety.
Rom 10:4 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 5:17 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 10:22 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 24:13 (allusion, medium confidence) · Phil 3:19 (quotation, high confidence) · Phil 3:20 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: "End" in Scripture means completion, not ceasing to exist: Christ is the end of the law as its fulfilment (Rom 10:4; Matt 5:17).
- Quotations: Matt 5:17; Matt 10:22 (24:13); Phil 3:19–20; allusion: Rom 10:4. Migne's gloss "(ad instar impiorum)" is removed.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's gloss removed (not Hilary's)): (ad instar impiorum) → .
Topics: Eschatology
Cite (SBL): Hilary, Trin. 11.28 (PL 10:418a–418c; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/hilary-trinitate/11-19/#p-11-28). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-hilary-trinitate-11-28) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 10 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF² 9 (Watson and Pullan, 1899); differences checked against the Latin.
11.29PL 10:418c–419a
Nunc igitur quia jam ambigi non potest, in fine non defectionem, sed non excessuram constitutionem esse intelligendam, quamquam adhuc quaedam in ipsa dicti absolutione sint reservata: tamen his tantum ad significationem sensus demonstratis, videamus an traditio regni defectio sit intelligenda regnandi; ut quod tradit Filius Patri, tradendo non teneat. Quod si quis stultae impietatis furore contendet; fateatur necesse est Patrem, cum tradidit omnia Filio, amisisse tradendo, si tradidisse traditis egere significet. Ait enim Dominus, Omnia mihi tradita sunt a patre meo; et rursum: Data est mihi omnis potestas in coelo et in terra. Si igitur tradidisse caruisse est; Pater quoque his quae dedit caruit. Quod si Pater tradendo non caruit; ne Filius quidem intelligi potest bis egere quae tradit. Ergo si tradidisse omnia, his ipsis quae tradidit non videtur eguisse; reliquum est, ut in tradendo dispensationis causa noscatur, cur et Pater tradendo non careat, et Filius dando non egeat.
Now, then, since it can no longer be doubted that by the end is to be understood not a failing but a condition that will not be surpassed, although some things are still reserved in the very resolution of the saying, yet, having shown these things only to indicate the sense, let us see whether the handing over of the kingdom is to be understood as a failing of reigning; so that what the Son hands over to the Father he does not hold by handing it over. If anyone contends this with the madness of foolish impiety, he must confess that the Father, when he handed over all things to the Son, lost them by handing them over, if to have handed over means to lack what was handed over. For the Lord says: "All things have been handed over to me by my Father"; and again: "All power has been given to me in heaven and on earth." If, then, to have handed over is to have gone without, the Father too went without what he gave. But if the Father did not go without by handing over, neither can the Son be understood to lack what he hands over. If, then, the one who handed over all things is not seen to have lacked the very things he handed over, it remains that in the handing over the cause of a dispensation is to be recognized, why both the Father does not go without by handing over, and the Son does not lack by giving.
Matt 11:27 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 28:18 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:24 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Handing over the kingdom is no loss, just as the Father lost nothing in handing all things to the Son (Matt 11:27; 28:18).
- Quotations: Matt 11:27; Matt 28:18; allusion: 1 Cor 15:24.
Topics: Christology, Eschatology
Cite (SBL): Hilary, Trin. 11.29 (PL 10:418c–419a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/hilary-trinitate/11-19/#p-11-29). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-hilary-trinitate-11-29) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 10 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF² 9 (Watson and Pullan, 1899); differences checked against the Latin.
11.30PL 10:419a–419d
De subjectione autem, ne quid in ea contumeliosum Filio deputetur, cum alia nonnulla fidei nostrae opitulentur, praecipue tamen sibi hic ipse locus adorit. Et primum communem sensum Interrogo, utrum nunc subjectionem ita intelligendam putemus, tamquam servitutem dominatui, aut infirmitatem virtuti, aut honori inhonorationem contrarils qualitatibus subdimus, ut Filius secundum haec Deo patri sit dissidentis naturae diversitate subjectus. Quod si ita existimabitur, errorem hunc opinionis humanae apostolici sermonis cautela prohibebit, Subjectis enim sibi omnibus, tunc subjiciendum subjicienti sibi omnia ait: et per id, quod tunc subjicietur, dispensationem significavit in tempore. Nam si subjectionem aliud sentiemus, etsi tunc subjicietur, certe subjectus modo non est: et efficiemus eum dissidentem et insolantem et impium, quem necessitas temporis tamquam fracto et compresso tyrannicae impietatis tumore, in seram obsequelam sit subditura. Et ubi illud erit: Non veni voluntatem meum facere, sed voluntatem ejus qui misit me; ei rursum: Propterea Pater diligit me, quia omnia quae placita sunt ei facio; sed et illud: Pater, fiat voluntas tua; vel boc Apostoli: Humiliavit se factus obedicus usque ad mortem? Et qui se humilint, habet hoc in natura ne humilis sit; et qui fit obediens, suscipit ex voluntate quod obedit, dum per id, quod se humiliat, fit obediens. Unigenitus itaque Deus humilians se, et obediens Patri usque ad mortem erucis, quo genere, cum subjecta ei omnia sint, tunc subjiciendus ipse Patri intelligetur? nisi quod subjectio haec non novae obedientiae, sed dispensandi sacramenti est; quia et obsequela jam maneat, et in tempore sit ineunda subjectio? Nihil itaque nunc aliud subjectionis significatio, quam mysterii demonstratio est.
As for the subjection, so that nothing insulting may be ascribed to the Son in it, though some other things support our faith, this very passage chiefly helps itself. And first I ask common sense whether we think the subjection is now to be understood as when we subject servitude to lordship, weakness to strength, or dishonour to honour, by contrary qualities, so that accordingly the Son would be subject to God the Father by a difference of dissenting nature. If that is thought, the carefulness of the apostle's speech will forbid this error of human opinion. For he says that, when all things are subjected to him, then he is to be subjected to him who subjects all things to him; and by "then he will be subjected" he signified a dispensation in time. For if we understand the subjection otherwise, though "then he will be subjected," he is certainly not subject now; and we shall make him dissenting, insolent, and impious, one whom the necessity of time, as though the swelling of a tyrannical impiety had been broken and crushed, will at last subdue into belated obedience. And where will this be: "I did not come to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me"; and again: "For this reason the Father loves me, because I do all things that please him"; and this: "Father, your will be done"; or this of the apostle: "He humbled himself, becoming obedient even to death"? He who humbles himself has this in his nature, that he is not lowly; and he who becomes obedient takes up obedience by his will, since through humbling himself he becomes obedient. The only-begotten God, then, humbling himself and obedient to the Father even to the death of the cross, in what way will he be understood to be then subjected to the Father, when all things have been subjected to him? Unless this subjection is not of a new obedience but of a mystery to be dispensed; because obedience already remains, and the subjection is to be entered upon in time? The meaning of the subjection, then, is now nothing other than the showing of a mystery.
1 Cor 15:28 (allusion, high confidence) · John 6:38 (quotation, high confidence) · John 8:29 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 26:42 (quotation, high confidence) · Phil 2:8 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Since the Son already obeys the Father (John 6:38; Phil 2:8), the future subjection of 1 Cor 15:28 is not a new obedience but part of the dispensation.
- Quotations: John 6:38; John 8:29 (in Hilary's form); Matt 26:42; Phil 2:8; allusion: 1 Cor 15:28.
Topics: Christology, Eschatology
Cite (SBL): Hilary, Trin. 11.30 (PL 10:419a–419d; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/hilary-trinitate/11-19/#p-11-30). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-hilary-trinitate-11-30) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 10 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF² 9 (Watson and Pullan, 1899); differences checked against the Latin.
11.31PL 10:420a–420b
Et quod sit, secundum hanc eamdem fidei nostrae spem intelligendum est. Nam resurgentem a mortuis Dominum Jesum Christum sedere a dextris Dei, non ignorabile est, etiam Apostolo testante, cum ait: Secundum operationem potentiae fortitudinis ejus, quam operatus est in Christo, cum eum excitavit a mortuis, et collocavit ad dexteram suam in caelis super omnem principatum et potestatem et virtutem et dominationem, et omne nomen quod nominatur non solum in hoe saeculo, sed et in futuro, et omnia subjecit sub pedibus ejus. Apostolicus namque sermo secundum Dei potestatem pro factis jam futura significat. Quae enim per adimpletionem temporum sunt gerenda, ea jam in Christo, in quo omnis est plenitudo, consistunt: et quaecumque futura erunt, dispensationis in his potius est ordo, quam novitas. Subjecit enim omnia Deus sub pedibus ejus, licet adhuc subjicienda sint: ut in eo, quod subjecta sunt, Christi indemutabilis sit potestas; in eo vero, quod subjicienda sunt, secundum plenitudinem temporum succedentium ad finem aetatum profectus sit.
And what it is must be understood according to this same hope of our faith. For it is not unknown that the Lord Jesus Christ, rising from the dead, sits at the right hand of God, as the apostle too testifies when he says: "According to the working of the might of his strength, which he worked in Christ when he raised him from the dead and set him at his right hand in the heavens, above every principality and power and might and dominion, and every name that is named, not only in this age but also in that to come; and he subjected all things under his feet." For the apostolic speech, according to the power of God, signifies future things as done. For the things that are to be accomplished in the fullness of the times already stand in Christ, in whom is all fullness; and whatever will be, there is in them an order of dispensation rather than a novelty. For God has subjected all things under his feet, though they are still to be subjected: so that in their being subjected Christ's power is unchangeable, while in their being yet to be subjected there is an advance, according to the fullness of the succeeding times, toward the end of the ages.
Eph 1:19 (quotation, high confidence) · Eph 1:20 (quotation, high confidence) · Eph 1:21 (quotation, high confidence) · Eph 1:22 (quotation, high confidence) · Eph 1:10 (allusion, medium confidence) · Col 1:19 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Eph 1:19–22 speaks of all things already subjected to Christ, since what is future is already secure in him, though still to be worked out in time.
- Quotation: Eph 1:19–22; allusions: Eph 1:10; Col 1:19; Ps 8:6.
Topics: Christology, Eschatology
Cite (SBL): Hilary, Trin. 11.31 (PL 10:420a–420b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/hilary-trinitate/11-19/#p-11-31). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-hilary-trinitate-11-31) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 10 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF² 9 (Watson and Pullan, 1899); differences checked against the Latin.
11.32PL 10:420b–420c
Omnem autem contrariam virtutem evacuandem esse non obscura cognitio est, et hunc aeris principem et spiritalis nequitiae potestatem aeterno interitui tradendum, secundum illud: Discedite a me, maledicti, in ignem aeternum, quem praeparavit pater meus diabolo et angelis ejus· Evacuatio autem non idem est, quod subjectio. Nam evacuare adversantem potestatem, hoc est jus potestatis auferre ne maneat, et per potestatis evacuationem, regni est abolere dominatum. De quo et Dominus testatus est dicens, Regnum meum non est de hoc saeculo: hunc eumdem regni istius potentem mundi principem ante testatus, cujus potestas desinet regni sui evacuata dominatu. Subjectio vero, quae et obedientiae et fidei est, eadem vel concessionis vel demutationis demonstratio est.
That every hostile power is to be made void is no obscure knowledge, and that this prince of the air and power of spiritual wickedness is to be handed over to eternal destruction, according to the saying: "Depart from me, you cursed, into the eternal fire which my Father has prepared for the devil and his angels." But making void is not the same as subjection. For to make void an opposing power is to take away the right of power so that it does not remain, and, through the making void of the power, to abolish the dominion of the kingdom. Of this the Lord too testified, saying: "My kingdom is not of this world," having before testified that the prince of this world is the master of this kingdom, whose power will cease when the dominion of his kingdom is made void. But subjection, which belongs to obedience and faith, is a sign either of yielding or of change.
1 Cor 15:24 (allusion, high confidence) · Eph 2:2 (allusion, high confidence) · Eph 6:12 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 25:41 (quotation, high confidence) · John 18:36 (quotation, high confidence) · John 12:31 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Making the hostile powers void, as with the devil's destruction (Matt 25:41), differs from subjection, which is obedience.
- Quotations: Matt 25:41 (Hilary's text reads "which my Father has prepared"); John 18:36; allusions: Eph 2:2; Eph 6:12; John 12:31; 1 Cor 15:24.
Topics: Christology, Eschatology
Cite (SBL): Hilary, Trin. 11.32 (PL 10:420b–420c; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/hilary-trinitate/11-19/#p-11-32). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-hilary-trinitate-11-32) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 10 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF² 9 (Watson and Pullan, 1899); differences checked against the Latin.
11.33PL 10:420c–421b
Evacuatis itaque magistratibus, subjicientur inimici ejus. Ita autem subjicientur, ut ipse sibi subjiciat. Ita vero subjiciet, ut ei subjiciat Deus. Anuc ignoravit Apostolus dicti evagelici virtutem, eum ait: Nemo venit ad me, nisi pater viem adducat illum ad me; cum tamen scriptum sit: Nemo nadit ad Patrem, nisi per me? ut nunc ipse sibi inimicos subjicit, et tamen Deus ei subjecit; omne per hoc opus ejus, Dei in eo esse opus testans. Et cum non nisi per eum eundum ad Patrem sit; ad eum tamen, nisi Pater adduxerit, non venitur. Nam dum filius Dei intelligitur, paternae in eo naturae veritas discitur. Atque ita et cognito Filio Deus pater advocat, et credito Filio Pater suscipit: quia significatio et cognitio Patris in Filio sit per significationem in se Dei patris, religiosos nos in eum paterna religione perferentis. Adducit ergo ita Pater, dum quod principale est pater creditur. Ad Patrem autem nemo vadit nisi por Filium: quia cessante in nobis fide Filii, ignorabilis Pater est, non adituris ad paternam religionem, nisi prius Filii veneratione suscepta. Atque ita Filio cognito, ad vitae nos aeternitatem Pater adducit et suscipit: et utrumque per Filium est, dum praedicattione per eum Patris, et perducit ad eum Pater, et ad Patrem ipse deducit. Ad absolutiorem itaque dicti praesentis intelligentiam commemoratio sacramenti istius fuit necessaria, ut per Filium esset, quod Pater nos et adducit et suscipit: et por hoc intelligeremus, quatenus quod ipse sibi subjecit, Deus ei subjecit. Dei scilicet in eo natura per nativitatem manente, et ea quae ipse agit agente: dum ita agit, ut ea Deus agat; et tamen ipse ea, quae Deus egerit, agat: ita tamen, ut in eo quod ipse agit, filius Dei agere intelligatur; in eo vero quod Deus agit, paternae in eo naturae ut in filio proprietas sentiatur exsistere.
When the rulers have been made void, then, his enemies will be subjected. And they will be subjected in such a way that he himself subjects them to himself. And he will subject them in such a way that God subjects them to him. Was the apostle ignorant of the force of the gospel saying, when he says: "No one comes to me unless the Father draws him to me"; while yet it is written: "No one goes to the Father except through me"? So that now he himself subjects the enemies to himself, and yet God has subjected them to him, testifying through this that all his work is the work of God in him. And though one must go to the Father only through him, yet one does not come to him unless the Father draws him. For when he is understood as the Son of God, the truth of the Father's nature in him is learned. And so, when the Son is known, God the Father calls; and when the Son is believed, the Father receives; because the signifying and knowledge of the Father is in the Son, through the signifying in himself of God the Father, who carries us, devout toward him, with a fatherly devotion. The Father draws, then, in this way, since what is principal, that he is Father, is believed. But no one goes to the Father except through the Son; because, when faith in the Son ceases in us, the Father is unknowable, for we will not come to the worship of the Father unless the veneration of the Son is first taken up. And so, when the Son is known, the Father draws and receives us to eternity of life; and both are through the Son, since, through the preaching of the Father by him, the Father both leads to him and he himself leads to the Father. For a more complete understanding of the present saying, then, the recalling of this mystery was necessary, so that it would be through the Son that the Father both draws and receives us; and through this we might understand how far what he himself subjected to himself, God subjected to him: the nature of God namely remaining in him by birth, and doing the things he himself does; since he does them in such a way that God does them, and yet he himself does what God has done; yet so that in what he himself does, the Son of God is understood to act, while in what God does, the property of the Father's nature is perceived to exist in him as in a Son.
1 Cor 15:24 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:27 (allusion, high confidence) · John 6:44 (quotation, high confidence) · John 14:6 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: As the Father draws people to the Son and the Son leads them to the Father (John 6:44; 14:6), so the Son subjects his enemies and God subjects them to him.
- Quotations: John 6:44; John 14:6; allusion: 1 Cor 15:24–27.
Topics: Trinity, Christology
Cite (SBL): Hilary, Trin. 11.33 (PL 10:420c–421b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/hilary-trinitate/11-19/#p-11-33). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-hilary-trinitate-11-33) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 10 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF² 9 (Watson and Pullan, 1899); differences checked against the Latin.
11.34PL 10:421c–422a
Evacuatis itaque magistratibus et potestatibus, subjicientur ei sub pedibus inimici ejus. Et quos inimicos intelligi oporteat, idem Apostolus docuit, dicens: Secundum Evangelium quidem inimici propter vos, secundum electionem autem dilecti propter patres. Hos ergo inimicos crucis Christi meminimus: sed quia diecti propter patres sunt, scimus eos subjectioni reservatos, secundum quod dictum est: Non enim volo vos ignorare, fratres, sacramentum hoc, ut non sitis vobis sapientes: quoniam ex parte obtusio facta est in Israel, quoad usque plenitudo nationum intret; et sic omnis Israel liberabitur, sicut scriptum est, Et veniet a Sion, qui liberet, et avertat impietates ab Jacob, et hoc illis a me testamentum est, cum abstulero iniquitates eorum. Inimici ergo subjicientur sub pedibus ejus.
When the rulers and powers have been made void, then, his enemies will be subjected to him under his feet. And who are to be understood as enemies the same apostle taught, saying: "As regards the gospel they are enemies for your sake, but as regards election they are beloved for the sake of the fathers." We remember, then, that these are enemies of the cross of Christ; but because they are beloved for the sake of the fathers, we know that they are reserved for subjection, according to what was said: "For I do not want you to be ignorant, brothers, of this mystery, so that you may not be wise in your own sight: that a hardening has come upon Israel in part, until the fullness of the nations comes in; and so all Israel will be delivered, as it is written: The deliverer will come from Zion and will turn away ungodliness from Jacob; and this is my covenant with them, when I take away their iniquities." The enemies, then, will be subjected under his feet.
Rom 11:28 (quotation, high confidence) · Phil 3:18 (allusion, medium confidence) · Rom 11:25 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 11:26 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 11:27 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 59:20 (allusion, medium confidence) · 1 Cor 15:25 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The enemies to be subjected include Israel, now hardened but beloved, who will be delivered (Rom 11:25–28).
- Quotations: Rom 11:28; Rom 11:25–27 (Isa 59:20–21); allusion: Phil 3:18. Hilary's identification of the "enemies" is translated as written.
Topics: Eschatology
Cite (SBL): Hilary, Trin. 11.34 (PL 10:421c–422a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/hilary-trinitate/11-19/#p-11-34). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-hilary-trinitate-11-34) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 10 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF² 9 (Watson and Pullan, 1899); differences checked against the Latin.
11.35PL 10:422a–423a
Sed subjectionem illam quid consequatur, intel ligendum est, nempe illud, Novissime devicta est ab eo mors. Devictio autem mortis nihil aliud quam resurrectio ex mortuis est: cum interitus corruptione cessante, vivae jam coelestisque naturae constituatur aeternitas, secundum quod dictum est: Oportet enim corruptivum istud induere incorruptionem, et mortale istud induere immortalitatem. Cum autem mortale istud induerit immortalitatem, tunc fiet verbum quod scriptum est: Absorpta est mors in contentione. Ubi est mors aculeus tuus? Ubi est mors contentio tua?. In subjectione itaque inimicorum mors vincitur: et morte victa, immortalitatis vita succedit. Quae autem subjectionis perfecta illa post fidei subjectionem proprietas sit, idem Apostolus testatus est, cum ait, Qui transfigurabit corpus humilitatis nostrae conforme corpori gloriae suae; secundum efficaciae suae opera, qua possit subjicere sibi amnia. Subjectio itaque etiam ea est, quae est ex natura iu naturam concessio: dum a se secundum quod est desinens, ei subjicitur, cujus concedit in formam. Desinit autem, non ut non sit, sed ut proficiat: fitque ex demutatione subditus, in speciem suscepti alterius generis transeundo.
But we must understand what follows that subjection: namely this, "Last of all death was conquered by him." And the conquering of death is nothing other than the resurrection from the dead, when, the corruption of destruction ceasing, the eternity of a living and now heavenly nature is established, according to what was said: "For this corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality. And when this mortal has put on immortality, then the word that is written will come to pass: Death is swallowed up in the contest. Where, O death, is your sting? Where, O death, is your contest?" In the subjection of the enemies, then, death is conquered; and, death being conquered, the life of immortality follows. And what that perfect property of subjection is, after the subjection of faith, the same apostle testified when he says: "Who will transform the body of our lowliness to be conformed to the body of his glory, according to the working of his power by which he is able to subject all things to himself." Subjection, then, is also that which is a yielding from nature into nature, when one, ceasing from what one is, is subjected to him into whose form one yields. And one ceases, not so as not to be, but so as to advance; and becomes subject by change, passing into the likeness of another kind taken up.
1 Cor 15:26 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:53 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:54 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:55 (quotation, high confidence) · Phil 3:21 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The defeat of death is the resurrection (1 Cor 15:53–55); subjection also means our transformation into the likeness of Christ's glorious body (Phil 3:21).
- Quotations: 1 Cor 15:26 (in Hilary's form); 1 Cor 15:53–55 ("in the contest" follows Hilary's Latin, in contentione); Phil 3:21.
Topics: Eschatology
Cite (SBL): Hilary, Trin. 11.35 (PL 10:422a–423a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/hilary-trinitate/11-19/#p-11-35). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-hilary-trinitate-11-35) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 10 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF² 9 (Watson and Pullan, 1899); differences checked against the Latin.
11.36PL 10:423a–423b
Denique ut sacramenti hujus esset ratio absoluta, post novissime devictam mortem, tum ait: Cum autem dixerit, Omnia subjecta sunt, absque eo qui subjecit ei omnia, tunc ipse subjectus erit illi, qui ei subjecit omnia, ut sit Deus omnia in omnibus. Primus igitur sacramenti gradus est, subjecta esse ei omnia; et tunc ipsum subjectum fieri subjicienti sibi omnia: ut quemadmodum nos gloriae regnantis corporis sui subdimur, eodem rursum sacramento ipse regnans in gloria corporis subjicienti sibi universa subdatur. Subdimur autem gloriae corporis sui, ut in ea simus claritate, qua regnat in corpore: quia corpori ejus conformes erimus.
Finally, so that the reason of this mystery might be complete, after death has been conquered last of all, he then says: "But when he says, All things are subjected, it is evident that he is excepted who subjected all things to him; then he himself will be subjected to him who subjected all things to him, that God may be all in all." The first step of the mystery, then, is that all things are subjected to him; and then that he himself becomes subject to him who subjects all things to him; so that, as we are subjected to the glory of his reigning body, by the same mystery he himself, reigning in the glory of the body, is in turn subjected to him who subjects all things to himself. And we are subjected to the glory of his body so that we may be in that brightness in which he reigns in the body, because we shall be conformed to his body.
1 Cor 15:27 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:28 (quotation, high confidence) · Phil 3:21 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: As we are subjected to the glory of Christ's body, so he, reigning in that body, will be subjected to the Father (1 Cor 15:27–28).
- Quotation: 1 Cor 15:27–28. Migne's reference "(I. Cor. xv, 26 et seqq.)" is removed.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's Scripture reference removed (not Hilary's)): (I. Cor. xv, 26 et seqq.) → .
Topics: Eschatology, Christology
Cite (SBL): Hilary, Trin. 11.36 (PL 10:423a–423b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/hilary-trinitate/11-19/#p-11-36). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-hilary-trinitate-11-36) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 10 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF² 9 (Watson and Pullan, 1899); differences checked against the Latin.
11.37PL 10:423b–423c
Et quidem gloriam regnantis nunc corporis sui Evangelica non tacent. Ita enim scribitur, Domino dicente: Amen dico vobis, quoniam sunt aliqui de adstantibus istis, qui non gustabunt mortem, donec videant filium hominis venientem in regno suo. Et factum est post dies sex, assumpsit Jesus Petrum et Jacobum et Joannem fratrem ejus, et ducit illos in montem excelsum seorsum, et transfiguratus est Jesus ante eos, et resplenduit facies ejus ut sol, vestimenta autem ejus facta sunt sicut nix. Gloria itaque venientis in regnum corporis Apostolis demonstrata est: Nam in habitu Dominus gloriosae transformationis suae constitit, regnantis corporis sui claritate patefacta.
And the Gospels do not keep silent about the glory of his body now reigning. For it is written thus, the Lord saying: "Amen I say to you, there are some of those standing here who will not taste death until they see the Son of Man coming in his kingdom. And it came to pass after six days, Jesus took Peter and James and John his brother, and led them up a high mountain apart, and Jesus was transfigured before them, and his face shone like the sun, and his garments became like snow." The glory of the body coming into the kingdom, then, was shown to the apostles. For the Lord stood in the condition of his glorious transformation, the brightness of his reigning body being laid open.
Matt 16:28 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 17:1 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 17:2 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The transfiguration (Matt 16:28–17:2) showed the apostles the glory of Christ's body coming in his kingdom.
- Quotations: Matt 16:28; Matt 17:1–2.
Topics: Christology, Eschatology
Cite (SBL): Hilary, Trin. 11.37 (PL 10:423b–423c; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/hilary-trinitate/11-19/#p-11-37). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-hilary-trinitate-11-37) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 10 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF² 9 (Watson and Pullan, 1899); differences checked against the Latin.
11.38PL 10:423c–424a
Et hujus quidem gloriae suae consortium Apostolis pollicens, ait: Sic erit in consummatione saeculi. Mittet filius hominis angelos suos, et colligent de regno ejus omnia scandala et qui faciunt iniquitatem, et mittet eos in caminum ignis; ibi erit fletus et stridor dentium. Tunc justi fulgebunt sicut sol in regno patris eorum: qui habet aures audiendi, audiat. Numquid non omnibus naturales corporalesque aures ad dictorum audientiam patent, ut ad audiendum dominica admonitione fuerit necessarium? Sed sacramenti scientiam Dominus insinuans, auditionem doctrinae fidelis exegit. In consummatione itaque saeculi de regno ejus scandala auferuntur. Habemus ergo regnantem Dominum secundum corporis claritatem, quo usque scandala auferantur. Habemus rursum conformes nos gloriae corporis sui in regno Patris, tamquam in solis claritate fulgentes: in qua habitum regni sui Apostolis in monte transformatus ostendit.
And promising the apostles a share in this glory of his, he says: "So will it be at the consummation of the age. The Son of Man will send his angels, and they will gather out of his kingdom all stumbling blocks and those who do iniquity, and will cast them into the furnace of fire; there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth. Then the righteous will shine like the sun in the kingdom of their Father. He who has ears to hear, let him hear." Are not natural and bodily ears open to all for hearing what is said, so that the Lord's admonition to hear was necessary? But the Lord, conveying the knowledge of a mystery, required the hearing of faithful teaching. At the consummation of the age, then, stumbling blocks are taken out of his kingdom. We have, then, the Lord reigning according to the brightness of the body until the stumbling blocks are taken away. We have, again, ourselves conformed to the glory of his body in the kingdom of the Father, shining as in the brightness of the sun, in which, transformed on the mountain, he showed the apostles the condition of his kingdom.
Matt 13:40 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 13:41 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 13:42 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 13:43 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 17:2 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Matt 13:40–43 shows Christ reigning until the stumbling blocks are removed, and the righteous then shining in the Father's kingdom.
- Quotation: Matt 13:40–43; allusion: Matt 17:2.
Topics: Eschatology
Cite (SBL): Hilary, Trin. 11.38 (PL 10:423c–424a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/hilary-trinitate/11-19/#p-11-38). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-hilary-trinitate-11-38) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 10 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF² 9 (Watson and Pullan, 1899); differences checked against the Latin.
11.39PL 10:424a–425a
Tradet ergo regnum Deo patri: non ita, tamquam tradens potestate concedat, sed quod nos conformes gloriae corporis sui facti regnum Dei erimus. Non enim ait: Tradet suum regnum; sed Tradet regnum, effectos nos per glorificationem corporis sui regnum Deo traditurus. Nos itaque tradet in regnum, secundum hoc in Evangeliis dictum: Venite, benedicti patris mei, possidete praeparatum vobis regnum a constitutione mundi. Fulgebunt ergo justi ut sol in regno patris eorum. Tradet enim Filius Deo regnum eos, quos vocavit in regnum, quibus et beatitudinem sacramenti hujus spopondit dicens: Beati mundo corde, quoniam ipsi Deum videbunt. Regnans itaque avertet scandala, et tunc justi in regno Patris tamquam sol fulgebunt. Tradet autem Deo patri regnum: et tunc quos regnum Deo tradiderit, Deum videbunt. Et quod regnum, ipse testatus est dicens ad Apostolos: In vobis enim est regnum Dei. Regnans itaque regnum tradet. Et si quis quaerat quis iste sit tradens regnum, audiet: Christus resurrexit a mortuis, primitiae dormientium; quoniam per hominem mors, et per hominem resurrectio mortuorum. Omnis enim hic nunc praesentis quaestionis sermo de sacramento corporis est, quia Christus primitiae ex mortuis est. Quo autem Christus mysterio ex mortuis resurrexit, Apostolo dicente noscamus: Memento Christum a mortuis resurrexisse, de semine David: mortem itaque et resurrectionem ex ea tantum docens dispensatione esse, qua caro est.
He will hand over the kingdom, then, to God the Father: not as though, by handing it over, he gives up his power, but because we, made conformed to the glory of his body, will be the kingdom of God. For he does not say, "He will hand over his kingdom," but "He will hand over the kingdom," being about to hand us over to God as the kingdom, made so through the glorification of his body. He will hand us over, then, into the kingdom, according to this saying in the Gospels: "Come, you blessed of my Father, possess the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world." The righteous, then, will shine like the sun in the kingdom of their Father. For the Son will hand over to God as the kingdom those whom he called into the kingdom, to whom he also pledged the blessedness of this mystery, saying: "Blessed are the pure in heart, for they will see God." Reigning, then, he will remove the stumbling blocks, and then the righteous will shine like the sun in the kingdom of the Father. And he will hand over the kingdom to God the Father; and then those whom he has handed over to God as the kingdom will see God. And what the kingdom is he himself testified, saying to the apostles: "For the kingdom of God is within you." Reigning, then, he will hand over the kingdom. And if anyone asks who this is who hands over the kingdom, he will hear: "Christ has risen from the dead, the firstfruits of those who sleep; for since by a man came death, by a man also the resurrection of the dead." For the whole speech of the present question here concerns the mystery of the body, because Christ is the firstfruits from the dead. And in what mystery Christ rose from the dead let us learn from the apostle, who says: "Remember that Christ has risen from the dead, of the seed of David"; teaching that the death and resurrection are only from that dispensation by which he is flesh.
1 Cor 15:24 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 25:34 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 13:43 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 5:8 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 17:21 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:20 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:21 (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Tim 2:8 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Christ hands over the kingdom by presenting to the Father the redeemed, glorified like him, who are themselves the kingdom (Matt 25:34; Luke 17:21).
- Quotations: Matt 25:34; Matt 13:43; Matt 5:8; Luke 17:21; 1 Cor 15:20–21; 2 Tim 2:8; allusion: 1 Cor 15:24.
Topics: Eschatology, Christology
Cite (SBL): Hilary, Trin. 11.39 (PL 10:424a–425a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/hilary-trinitate/11-19/#p-11-39). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-hilary-trinitate-11-39) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 10 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF² 9 (Watson and Pullan, 1899); differences checked against the Latin.
11.40PL 10:425a–426a
Regnat autem in hoc eodem glorioso jam suo corpore, donec evacuatis magistratibus, et morte devicta subjiciat sibi inimicos. Et quidem ab Apostolo servatus hic modus est, ut magistratibus et potestatibus evacuatio, inimicis vero subjectio deputaretur. Quibus subjectis, subjicietur subjicienti sibi omnia, Dominus scilicet, ut sit Deus omnia in omnibus, naturae assumpti corporis nostri natura paternae divinitatis invecta. Per id enim erit omnia in omnibus Deus, quia secundum dispensationem ex Deo et homine hominum Deique Mediator, habens in se ex dispensatione quod carnis est, adepturus in omnibus ex subjectione quod Dei est, ne ex parte Deus sit, sed Deus totus. Non alia itaque subjectionis causa est, quam ut omnia in omnibus Deus sit, nulla ex parte terreni in eo corporis residente natura, ut ante in se duos continens, nunc Deus tantum sit; non abjecto corpore, sed ex subjectione translato; neque per defectionem abolito, sed ex clarificatione mutato; acquirens sibi Deo potius hominem, quam Deum per hominem amittens. Subjectus vero ob id, non ut non sit, sed ut omnia in omnibus Deus sit; habens in sacramento subjectionis esse ac manere quod non est, non habens in defectione ita se carere, ne non sit.
And he reigns in this same body of his, now glorious, until, the rulers having been made void and death conquered, he subjects his enemies to himself. And indeed this distinction was kept by the apostle, that making void was assigned to the rulers and powers, but subjection to the enemies. When these have been subjected, he, the Lord, will be subjected to him who subjects all things to himself, that God may be all in all, the nature of the Father's divinity being brought into the nature of our body which he took up. For through this God will be all in all: because, according to the dispensation, being from God and man the Mediator of men and God, having in himself from the dispensation what belongs to the flesh, he is to attain in all things from the subjection what belongs to God, so as to be God not in part but God wholly. There is, then, no other cause of the subjection than that God may be all in all, no nature of an earthly body remaining in him in any part; so that, having before contained two in himself, he may now be God only: not by casting off the body, but by its being transferred through subjection; not abolished by failing, but changed by glorification; gaining man for himself as God rather than losing God through man. And he is subjected for this reason, not so as not to be, but so that God may be all in all; having, in the mystery of the subjection, to be and to abide what he is not, not having, by a failing, so to lack himself as not to be.
1 Cor 15:24 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:25 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:26 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:28 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Tim 2:5 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Christ reigns in his glorified body until all enemies are subdued; then his humanity, not cast off but glorified, will be wholly taken into God, so that God is all in all.
- Allusions: 1 Cor 15:24–28; 1 Tim 2:5. Hilary's statements that "no nature of an earthly body" will remain and that Christ will "now be God only," with the body "not cast off" but "changed by glorification," are distinctive and are translated exactly as written.
Topics: Christology, Eschatology
Cite (SBL): Hilary, Trin. 11.40 (PL 10:425a–426a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/hilary-trinitate/11-19/#p-11-40). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-hilary-trinitate-11-40) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 10 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF² 9 (Watson and Pullan, 1899); differences checked against the Latin.
11.41PL 10:426a–426b
Et quamquam ad intelligentiae hujus religiosam securitatem sufficiat nobis apostolica auctoritas, subjiciendum esse in tempore et per dispensationem Dominum Jesum Christum primitias dormientium, ut sit Deus omnia in omnibus: per quod non divinitatis infirmitas est, sed assumptionis profectus, dum homo et Deus, jam Deus lotum est: tamen ne forte, quia et clarificatum in corpore dum in eo regnat, et postea subjiciendum ut Deus omnia in omnibus sit credimus, non etiam ex Evangeliis praesumpsisse existimemur; fidei nostrae testimonium non solum apostolicorum, sed etiam dominicorum dictorum professione est adstruendum; ut quod loquente Paulo Christus locutus est, id ante Paulum Christus ipse sit jam locutus.
And although the apostle's authority suffices us for the religious security of this understanding, that the Lord Jesus Christ, the firstfruits of those who sleep, is to be subjected in time and through the dispensation, that God may be all in all, through which there is no weakness of divinity but an advance of what was taken up, since he who is man and God is now wholly God; yet, so that we may not be thought, because we believe that he is glorified in the body while he reigns in it and is afterwards to be subjected that God may be all in all, to have presumed this without the Gospels as well, the testimony of our faith must be built up by the profession not only of the apostle's sayings but also of the Lord's; so that what Christ spoke when Paul was speaking, Christ himself had already spoken before Paul.
1 Cor 15:20 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:28 (allusion, high confidence) · 2 Cor 13:3 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Hilary will confirm from the Lord's own words in the Gospels what he has drawn from Paul.
- Allusions: 1 Cor 15:20, 28; 2 Cor 13:3.
Topics: Christology, Eschatology
Cite (SBL): Hilary, Trin. 11.41 (PL 10:426a–426b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/hilary-trinitate/11-19/#p-11-41). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-hilary-trinitate-11-41) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 10 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF² 9 (Watson and Pullan, 1899); differences checked against the Latin.