The Conferences 4.19–5.10
Latin text: Petschenig, CSEL 13 (Latin text: Michael Petschenig (CSEL 13, 1886), digitized by Open Greek and Latin, University of Leipzig (csel-dev), CC BY-SA 4.0).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0). Compare: Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, series 2, vol. 11 (1894).
Chapter 4
4.19CSEL 13:112–115
DANIHEL: Secundum definitionem scripturae tres sunt animarum status, primus carnalis, secundus animalis, tertius spiritalis. quos in apostolo ita legimus designari. nam de carnalibus dicitur: lac uobis potum dedi, non escam: necdum enim poteratis. sed nec adhuc quidem potestis: adhuc enim estis carnales, et iterum: ubi enim est inter uos zelus et contentio, nonne carnales estis? de animali quoque taliter commemoratur: animalis autem homo non percipit ea quae sunt spiritus dei: stultitia est enim illi. de spiritali uero: spiritalis autem examinat omnia, ipse autem a nemine diiudicatur, et iterum: uos qui spiritales estis instruite eos qui eiusmodi sunt in spiritu lenitatis. itaque festinandum nobis est, ut cum renuntiantes desierimus esse carnales, id est a saecularium coeperimus conuersatione seiungi et ab illa manifesta carnis pollutione cessare, spiritalem statum protinus adprehendere tota uirtute nitamur, ne forte blandientes nobis, quod uidemur secundum exteriorem hominem huic renuntiasse mundo uel carnalium fornicationum deseruisse contagia, tamquam qui summam perfectionis per hoc adprehenderimus, remissiores deinceps erga emundationem ceterarum passionum lentioresque reddamur et inter utraque detenti gradum spiritalis profectus adsequi nequeamus, existimantes ad perfectionem nobis abunde sufficere, quod exteriore homine uideamur de conuersatione mundi huius ac uoluptatibus segregati, uel quod inmunes simus a corruptela et conmixtione carnali, et ita inuenti in illo tepido statu, qui deterrimus iudicatur, euomendos nos ex ore domini secundum eius sententiam nouerimus ita dicentis: utinam calidus esses aut frigidus. nunc autem tepidus es, et incipiam te euomere ex ore meo. nec inmerito eos dominus, quos iam in uisceribus receperat caritatis, noxie tepefactos cum quadam conuulsione pectoris sui euomendos esse pronuntiat, qui cum salutarem quodammodo ei potuissent praebere substantiam, auelli ab eius uisceribus maluerunt, tanto deteriores effecti illis qui numquam ori dominico inlati sunt cibis, quanto id quod nausea conpellente proicimus odibilius detestamur. quidquid enim frigidum est, etiam ore nostro susceptum uertitur in calorem et salutifera suauitate percipitur. quod autem semel uitio perniciosi teporis abiectum est, non dicam labiis admouere, sed etiam eminus intueri sine ingenti horrore non possumus. rectissime ergo pronuntiatur esse deterior, quia facilius ad salutarem conuersionem ac perfectionis fastigium carnalis quis, id est saecularis uel gentilis accedit, quam is qui professus monachum nec tamen uiam perfectionis adripiens secundum regulam disciplinae ab illo semel spiritalis feruoris igne discessit. ille namque corporalibus saltim uitiis humiliatus atque inmundum se sentiens contagione carnali ad fontem uerae purificationis ac perfectionis culmen quandoque conpunctus adcurret et horrescens illam in quo est infidelitatis gelidissimum statum spiritus ardore succensus ad perfectionem facilius conuolabit. nam qui semel ut diximus tepido exorsus initio monachi coepit abuti uocabulo, nec tamen humilitate ac feruore quo debuit iter huius professionis adripuit, infectus semel hac miserabili lue et in ea quodammodo resolutus nec ex sese ulterius perfecta sapere nec alterius poterit monitis erudiri. dicit enim in corde suo secundum illam domini sententiam: quia diues sum et locuples et nullius egeo. cui illud quoque quod subsequitur consequenter aptabitur: tu autem es miser et miserabilis et pauper et caecus et nudus: in eo factus etiam saeculari deterior, quod nec miserum se nec caecum ac nudum aut emendatione dignum uel egere monitis alicuius aut institutione cognoscit et ob hoc ne exhortationem quidem ullam uerbi salutaris admittit, non intellegens ipso monachi se nomine praegrauari ac deprimi opinione cunctorum, qua dum creditur ab omnibus sanctus et uelut dei famulus colitur, necesse est ut in futuro uehementiori iudicio poenaeque subdatur. postremo quid diutius inmoramur in his quae nobis experimento satis conperta sunt ac probata? frequenter uidimus de frigidis atque carnalibus, id est de saecularibus ac paganis ad spiritalem peruenisse feruorem, de tepidis atque animalibus omnino non uidimus. quos etiam per prophetam ita legimus dominum detestari, ut spiritalibus uiris atque doctoribus praecipiatur, ut ab eis monendis docendisque discedant et nequaquam uelut in sterili atque infructuosa terra noxiisque sentibus occupata semen uerbi salutaris expendant, sed ut contemnentes eam nouam potius excolant terram, id est erga paganos ac saeculares omnem doctrinae culturam ac uerbi transferant salutaris instantiam, quod ita legitur: haec dicit dominus uiro Iuda, et habitatori Hierusalem: nouate uobis nouale, et nolite serere super spinas.
Daniel: “According to the definition of Scripture there are three states of souls: the first fleshly, the second soulish, the third spiritual. We read them marked out thus in the apostle. Of the fleshly it is said: ‘I gave you milk to drink, not solid food, for you were not yet able; and indeed you are not able even now, for you are still fleshly’; and again: ‘For where there is jealousy and strife among you, are you not fleshly?’ Of the soulish it is said thus: ‘But the soulish man does not perceive the things of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him.’ Of the spiritual: ‘But the spiritual man judges all things, and he himself is judged by no one’; and again: ‘You who are spiritual, instruct such a one in a spirit of gentleness.’ So we must hasten, when by renouncing we have ceased to be fleshly, that is, have begun to be separated from the way of life of worldly people and to cease from that open pollution of the flesh, to strive at once with all our strength to lay hold of the spiritual state; lest, flattering ourselves that we seem to have renounced this world as to the outer man, or to have left the defilements of fleshly sexual immorality, as though we had thereby grasped the summit of perfection, we become slacker and slower thereafter in cleansing the other passions, and, held back between the two, cannot reach the degree of spiritual progress, thinking it abundantly enough for perfection that in the outer man we seem to be separated from the life and pleasures of this world, or that we are free from corruption and fleshly intercourse. And so, found in that lukewarm state which is judged the worst, we should know that we are to be spewed out of the Lord's mouth, according to his saying: ‘Would that you were hot or cold. But now you are lukewarm, and I will begin to spew you out of my mouth.’ Not without reason does the Lord declare that those whom he had already received into the bowels of his love, but who have become harmfully lukewarm, must be spewed out with a kind of convulsion of his breast. Though they could have provided him with a wholesome nourishment, as it were, they preferred to be torn from his bowels, and so became worse than foods that have never been brought to the Lord's mouth, just as we detest with more loathing what we throw up under the compulsion of nausea. For whatever is cold, once taken into our mouth, is turned to warmth and received with wholesome pleasure; but what has once been thrown up through the fault of a ruinous lukewarmness, we cannot, I will not say bring to our lips, but even look at from afar without great horror. Most rightly, then, it is declared to be worse, because a fleshly person, that is, a worldly person or a pagan, comes more easily to saving conversion and the summit of perfection than one who has professed himself a monk and yet, not taking the way of perfection according to the rule of discipline, has departed from that fire of spiritual fervor. For the former, humbled at least by bodily vices and feeling himself unclean from fleshly defilement, will one day run, pierced with compunction, to the source of true purification and the summit of perfection; and shuddering at that coldest state of unbelief in which he is, he will fly more easily to perfection, inflamed with the ardor of the spirit. But the one who, as we said, once began with a lukewarm beginning to misuse the name of monk, and did not take up the path of this profession with the humility and fervor he should, once infected with this wretched plague and in a way dissolved in it, will no longer be able either to be wise in perfect things of himself or to be taught by another's admonitions. For he says in his heart, according to the Lord's saying: ‘For I am rich and wealthy and need nothing.’ To him what follows will consequently apply: ‘But you are wretched and pitiable and poor and blind and naked.’ In this he has become worse even than a worldly person, because he does not recognize that he is wretched, blind, and naked, or worthy of correction, or in need of anyone's admonitions or instruction; and so he does not admit even any exhortation of the saving word, not understanding that he is weighed down by the very name of monk and pressed down by everyone's opinion. For since he is believed holy by all and honored as a servant of God, he must be subjected in the future to a more severe judgment and punishment. Finally, why do we dwell longer on what is well known and proved to us by experience? We have often seen people come from the cold and fleshly, that is, from worldly people and pagans, to spiritual fervor; from the lukewarm and soulish, we have never seen it at all. We read that the Lord so detests them through the prophet that spiritual men and teachers are commanded to leave off admonishing and teaching them, and not to spend the seed of the saving word on them as on barren and unfruitful ground, overgrown with harmful briars; but, despising that ground, rather to cultivate new ground, that is, to transfer all the cultivation of teaching and the urgency of the saving word to pagans and worldly people. So it is read: ‘Thus says the Lord to the man of Judah and the inhabitant of Jerusalem: Break up your fallow ground, and do not sow upon thorns.’”
1 Cor 3:2 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 3:3 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 2:14 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 2:15 (quotation, high confidence) · Gal 6:1 (quotation, high confidence) · Rev 3:15 (quotation, high confidence) · Rev 3:16 (quotation, high confidence) · Rev 3:17 (quotation, high confidence) · Jer 4:3 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Daniel describes three states, fleshly, soulish, and spiritual; the lukewarm monk who has left open sins but not his other passions is worse than a worldly person or pagan, and is rarely converted.
- 1 Cor 3:2–3; 1 Cor 2:14–15; Gal 6:1; Rev 3:15–17; Jer 4:3. animalis (“soulish”) renders ψυχικός; it is sometimes translated “natural” or “unspiritual”.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slip in the speaker's name; OCR slips; OCR slips and stray full stop; line-break hyphen and joined words): DAlmIEL → DANIHEL; lac nobis potum → lac uobis potum; ut oum renuntiantes → ut cum renuntiantes; conuersatione mundi huius ae uoluptatibus → conuersatione mundi huius ac uoluptatibus; secun-, dnmeius → secundum eius; noxie tepeactos → noxie tepefactos; ad fontem nerae → ad fontem uerae; infidelitatis geiidissimum statum. spiritus ardore suocensus → infidelitatis gelidissimum statum spiritus ardore succensus; praecipiatar, ut ab eis monendis doeendisque → praecipiatur, ut ab eis monendis docendisque; eam nonam potius → eam nouam potius.
Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 4.19 (CSEL 13:112–115; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/4-19/#p-4-19). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-4-19) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).
4.20CSEL 13:115–117
Denique, quod pudet dicere, ita plerosque abrenuntiasse conspicimus, ut nihil amplius inmutasse de anterioribus uitiis ac moribus conprobentur nisi ordinem tantummodo atque habitum saecularem. nam et adquirere pecunias gestiunt quas nec ante possederunt, uel certe quas habuerant retinere non desinunt aut, quod est lugubrius, etiam amplificare desiderant sub hoc praetextu, quod uel famulos suos exinde semper uel fratres alere se debere iustum esse contendant, uel certe sub obtentu congregandi coetus reseruant, quem uelut abbates instituere se posse praesumunt. qui si in ueritate uiam perfectionis inquirerent, hoc potius tota uirtute perficere niterentur, ut scilicet exuti non solum pecuniis, uerum etiam affectionibus pristinis et distentionibus uniuersis semet ipsos singulares ac nudos ita sub seniorum imperio conlocarent, ut curam non modo aliorum nullam, sed ne sui quidem gererent. e contrario autem euenit, ut dum fratribus praeesse festinant numquam senioribus ipsi subiciantur et a superbia inchoantes, dum alios instituere cupiunt, nec discere ipsi nec agere ea quae sunt docenda mereantur: qui necesse est ut secundum saluatoris sententiam caeci duces caecorum effecti pariter in foueam cadant. cuius superbiae licet unum sit genus, duplex tamen eius est species: una quae serietatem grauitatemque iugiter imitatur, alia quae effrenata libertate in cachinnos fatuos risusque dissoluitur. et illa quidem taciturnitate congaudet, haec uero dedignatur silentio coartari nec confunditur passim proloqui etiam res incongruas et ineptas, dum erubescit uel inferior ceteris uel indoctior iudicari. alia ob elationem clericatus ambit officium, altera despicit, utpote iudicans illud aut dignitati pristinae aut uitae ac natalium suorum meritis incongruum uel indignum. quarum quae deterior pronuntianda sit, uniuscuiusque discutiat ac perpendat examen. unum sane atque idem inoboedientiae genus est uel propter operationis instantiam uel propter otii desiderium senioris uiolare mandatum, tamque dispendiosum est pro somno quam pro uigilantia monasterii statuta conuellere, tantundemque est abbatis transire praeceptum ut legas, quantum si contemnas ut dormias, nec alius superbiae fomes est pro ieiunio fratrem quam pro refectione neglegere, nisi quod perniciosiora et a remediis longinquiora sunt uitia quae sub specie uirtutum et imagine spiritalium rerum uidentur emergere, quam illa quae ex aperto pro carnali uoluptate gignuntur. haec enim uelut palam expositi ac manifesti languores et arguuntur comminus et sanantur, illa uero, dum sub praetextu uirtutum teguntur, incurata perdurant et deceptos quosque periculosius faciunt ac desperatius aegrotare.
“Finally, shameful to say, we see many who have renounced the world in such a way that they are shown to have changed nothing of their former vices and habits except only their worldly rank and dress. For they are eager to acquire money which they did not possess before, or at any rate do not cease to keep what they had, or, what is more lamentable, even desire to increase it, under the pretext that they claim it is right for them always to support their servants or brothers from it; or else they keep it under the pretext of gathering a community, which they presume they can establish as abbots. If they truly sought the way of perfection, they would rather strive with all their strength to strip themselves not only of money but also of former affections and all distractions, and place themselves, alone and naked, under the rule of the elders, so as to have no care not only for others but even for themselves. But the opposite happens: while they hasten to be over the brothers, they themselves are never subject to the elders, and, beginning from pride, while they desire to instruct others, they do not deserve either to learn or to do what is to be taught. They must, according to the Savior's saying, become blind leaders of the blind and fall together into the pit. Although this pride is of one kind, it has two forms. One constantly imitates seriousness and gravity; the other dissolves with unbridled freedom into foolish laughter and giggling. The first delights in silence; the second disdains to be restrained by silence and is not ashamed to utter all sorts of unfitting and foolish things, while it blushes to be judged inferior or less learned than others. The one, out of pride, seeks the office of the clergy; the other despises it, judging it unfitting or unworthy of its former rank or of the merits of its life and birth. Which of these is to be declared the worse, let each person's examination discuss and weigh. It is certainly one and the same kind of disobedience to violate an elder's command either for the sake of urgent work or for the desire of leisure; it is as harmful to break the rules of the monastery for the sake of sleep as for the sake of watching; it is as much to transgress the abbot's command in order to read as to despise it in order to sleep; nor is it a different tinder of pride to neglect a brother for the sake of a fast than for the sake of a meal. Except that the vices which seem to arise under the appearance of virtues and the image of spiritual things are more ruinous and farther from remedy than those which openly come from fleshly pleasure. For these, like diseases laid open and manifest, are both rebuked at close quarters and healed; but the former, hidden under the pretext of virtues, remain uncured and make those they deceive sick more dangerously and more hopelessly.”
Matt 15:14 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Many renounce the world outwardly but keep money, seek to rule others as abbots, or show pride in feigned gravity or frivolity; vices disguised as virtues are the hardest to cure.
- Matt 15:14. “The office of the clergy” (clericatus): ordination; Cassian regards the monk's ambition for it, or disdain for it, as pride.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; stray comma; stray full stop; stray marks): non desinunt ant, quod → non desinunt aut, quod; saluatoris sententiam. caeci duces caecorum, effecti pariter in. foueam → saluatoris sententiam caeci duces caecorum effecti pariter in foueam; licet unum, sit genus → licet unum sit genus; grauitatemqae → grauitatemque; risusque. dissoluitur → risusque dissoluitur; et deceptos. quosque → et deceptos quosque.
Topics: Church office
Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 4.20 (CSEL 13:115–117; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/4-19/#p-4-20). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-4-20) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).
4.21CSEL 13:117–119
Nam illud ridiculum qualiter expromatur, quod nonnullos post illum primae renuntiationis ardorem, quo uel res familiares uel opes plurimas ac militiam saeculi relinquentes semet ipsos ad monasteria contulerunt, tanto cernimus studio in his, quae penitus abscidi non possunt et quae nequeunt in hoc ordine non haberi, quamuis parua uiliaque sint, esse deuinctos, ut horum cura pristinarum omnium facultatum superet passionem. quibus profecto non magne proderit maiores opes substantias contempsisse, quia affectus earum, ob quos illae contemnendae sunt, in res paruas atque exiguas transtulerunt. nam uitium cupiditatis et auaritiae, quod erga species pretiosas exercere non possunt, circa uiliores materias retinentes non abscidisse, sed conmutasse se probant pristinam passionem. nam nimia deuincti diligentia erga curam psiathii, sportellae, sagelli, codicis aliarumque similium rerum quamuis uilissimarum eadem tamen qua antea libidine detinentur. quae etiam tanta aemulatione custodiunt atque defendunt, ut pro ipsis aduersus fratrem conmoueri eos et quod est turpius etiam litigare non pudeat. in quibus adhuc aegritudine cupiditatis pristinae laborantes haec eadem, quae usus corporis possidere monachum uel necessitas cogit, secundum numerum mensuramque communem non sunt habere contenti, in hoc quoque sui cordis auaritiam designantes, cum uel ea quibus uti necesse est propensius student habere quam ceteri, uel excedentes diligentiae modum peculiarius ea adtentiusque custodiunt et ab aliorum contrectatione defendunt, quae uniuersis fratribus debent esse conmunia. quasi uero differentia tantummodo metallorum et non ipsa passio cupiditatis habeatur in noxa, et pro rebus quidem magnis irasci non liceat, pro uilioribus uero hoc ipsum fecisse sine culpa sit, et non idcirco pretiosiores abiecerimus materias, ut facilius disceremus uiliora contemnere. quid enim differt utrum quis perturbationem cupiditatis erga opes amplas atque magnificas an erga uiliores exerceat species, nisi quod in eo reprehensibilior iudicandus est, quod qui maxima spreuerit minimis obligetur? ideoque perfectionem cordis abrenuntiatio ista non obtinet, quia cum censum habeat pauperis, non abiecit diuitis uoluntatem.
“How can one express how ridiculous it is that some, after that ardor of the first renunciation by which they left their family property or great wealth and worldly service and gave themselves to monasteries, are, as we see, bound with such zeal to the things which cannot be wholly cut off and which cannot fail to be had in this order, small and cheap as they are, that their care for them exceeds their passion for all their former possessions. It will certainly not profit them much to have despised greater wealth and substance, since they have transferred their affection for it, for which it had to be despised, to small and trifling things. For keeping the vice of covetousness and avarice, which they cannot practise on precious goods, for cheaper materials, they prove that they have not cut off but only exchanged their former passion. For, bound by excessive care for a mat, a basket, a cloak, a book, and other such things, however cheap, they are held by the same desire as before. They even guard and defend them with such jealousy that they are not ashamed to be angry with a brother over them, and, what is more shameful, even to quarrel. Still suffering from the sickness of their former covetousness in these things, they are not content to have, according to the common number and measure, the very things which the use of the body or necessity compels a monk to possess; and in this too they show the avarice of their heart, either by striving to have more readily than the others the things that must be used, or, going beyond the measure of care, by guarding more particularly and attentively, and defending from others' handling, things that ought to be common to all the brothers. As if only the difference in metals, and not the passion of covetousness itself, were harmful; and as if it were not lawful to be angry over great things, but to do the same over cheaper ones were without fault; and as if we had not cast away more precious materials precisely so that we might more easily learn to despise cheaper ones. For what difference does it make whether one exercises the disturbance of covetousness over ample and magnificent wealth or over cheaper goods, except that he is to be judged the more blameworthy in that, having despised the greatest things, he is bound by the least? And so this renunciation does not attain perfection of heart, because, while it has the property of a poor man, it has not cast off the will of a rich one.”
Notes and citation
Summary: Monks who renounced great wealth but guard their mats, baskets, and books with the same covetousness have only exchanged, not cut off, their passion.
- psiathium: a reed mat; sagellum (sagulum): a small cloak.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR of a question mark as P; stray digits (probably a misread “et” or a page number)): opes 20 substantias → opes substantias; minimis obligetur P ideoque → minimis obligetur? ideoque.
Topics: Ethics
Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 4.21 (CSEL 13:117–119; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/4-19/#p-4-21). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-4-21) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).
Chapter 5
5.1CSEL 13:119
In illo coetu antiquissimorum senum fuit uir nomine Sarapion, adprime gratia discretionis ornatus, cuius conlationem operae pretium reor litteris tradere. ambientibus enim nobis ut de inpugnatione uitiorum aliqua disputaret, quibus origines eorum et causae manifestius panderentur, ita exorsus est.
In that gathering of the most ancient elders there was a man named Serapion, especially adorned with the grace of discernment, whose conference I think it worth while to commit to writing. When we asked him to discuss the assault of the vices, so that their origins and causes might be laid open more clearly, he began thus.
Notes and citation
Summary: Cassian introduces Abba Serapion, known for his discernment, who speaks on the vices.
Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 5.1 (CSEL 13:119; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/4-19/#p-5-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-5-1) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).
5.2CSEL 13:119
Octo sunt principalia uitia quae humanum infestant genus, id est primum gastrimargia, quod sonat uentris ingluuies, secundum fornicatio, tertium filargyria, id est auaritia siue amor pecuniae, quartum ira, quintum tristitia, sextum acedia, id est anxietas seu taedium cordis, septimum cenodoxia, id est iactantia seu uana gloria, octauum superbia.
“There are eight principal vices which attack the human race: first, gastrimargia, which means gluttony of the belly; second, sexual immorality; third, philargyria, that is, avarice or love of money; fourth, anger; fifth, sadness; sixth, acedia, that is, anxiety or weariness of heart; seventh, cenodoxia, that is, boasting or vainglory; eighth, pride.”
Notes and citation
Summary: Serapion names the eight principal vices: gluttony, sexual immorality, love of money, anger, sadness, acedia, vainglory, and pride.
- The list of eight vices comes from Evagrius of Pontus. Terms used in Conference 5: gastrimargia “gluttony”; fornicatio “sexual immorality”; filargyria “love of money”; ira “anger”; tristitia “sadness” (dejection); acedia “acedia” (listlessness, weariness or anxiety of heart); cenodoxia “vainglory”; superbia “pride”.
Topics: Ethics
Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 5.2 (CSEL 13:119; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/4-19/#p-5-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-5-2) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).
5.3CSEL 13:119–122
Horum igitur uitiorum genera sunt duo. aut enim naturalia sunt ut gastrimargia, aut extra naturam ut filargyria. efficientia uero quadripertita est. quaedam enim sine actione carnali consummari non possunt, ut est gastrimargia et fornicatio, quaedam uero etiam sine ulla corporis actione conplentur, ut est superbia et cenodoxia. nonnulla commotionis suae causas extrinsecus capiunt, ut est filargyria et ira alia uero intestinis motibus excitantur, ut est acedia atque tristitia.
“These vices are of two kinds. Some are natural, like gluttony; others are outside nature, like love of money. Their working is fourfold. Some cannot be completed without a bodily action, like gluttony and sexual immorality; others are fulfilled even without any action of the body, like pride and vainglory. Some take the causes of their stirring from outside, like love of money and anger; others are aroused by inner movements, like acedia and sadness.”
Notes and citation
Summary: The vices are natural or unnatural, and they differ in whether they need bodily action and whether they are provoked from outside or from within.
Topics: Ethics
Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 5.3 (CSEL 13:119–122; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/4-19/#p-5-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-5-3) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).
5.4CSEL 13:122–124
Et ut haec eadem non solum disputatione quantum possumus breui, sed etiam scripturarum testimoniis manifestiora reddamus, gastrimargia et fornicatio, cum naturaliter nobis insint (nam nonnumquam etiam sine ullo animi incitamento solius instigatione ac pruritu carnis oriuntur), materia tamen ut consummentur egent extrinsecus et ita in effectum corporali actione perueniunt. unusquisque enim temptatur a propria concupiscentia. deinde concupiscentia cum fuerit concepta parit peccatum, peccatum uero cum fuerit consummatum generat mortem. nam nec primus Adam per gastrimargiam decipi potuit, nisi escae materiam habens in promptu abusus ea fuisset inlicite, nec secundus sine cuiusdam materiae inlicitatione temptatur, cum dicitur ei: si filius dei es, dic ut lapides isti panes fiant. fornicatio quoque quod non nisi per corpus perficiatur, omnibus patet, ita de hoc spiritu dicente deo ad beatum Iob: et uirtus eius in lumbis, et potestas eius super umbilicum uentris. ideoque haec specialiter duo, quae ministerio carnis explentur, extra illam spiritalem animae curam egent peculiarius etiam continentia corporali, siquidem ad retundendos horum stimulos non sufficiat sola mentis intentio (ut nonnumquam solet aduersus iram seu tristitiam ceterasque fieri passiones, quas etiam sine ulla carnis adflictione sola nouit expugnare mentis industria), nisi etiam castigatio corporalis accesserit, quae ieiuniis, uigiliis et operis contritione perficitur, hisque fuerit remotio localis adiuncta, quia sicut amborum uitio, id est animae et corporis generantur, ita superari nisi utriusque labore non poterunt. et licet beatus apostolus omnia uitia generaliter pronuntiauerit esse carnalia, siquidem inimicitias et iras atque haereses inter cetera carnis opera numerauerit, nos tamen ad illorum curationes atque naturas diligentius colligendas duplici ea diuisione distinguimus. nam ex his quaedam dicimus esse carnalia, quaedam uero spiritalia. et illa quidem carnalia, quae specialiter ad fotum sensumque pertinent carnis, quibus illa ita delectatur ac pascitur, ut etiam quietas incitet mentes inuitasque eas nonnumquam pertrahat ad suae uoluntatis adsensum. de quibus beatus apostolus in quibus, ait, et nos omnes aliquando conuersati sumus in desideriis carnis nostrae, facientes uoluntatem carnis et cogitationum, et eramus natura filii irae sicut et ceteri. spiritalia uero dicimus, quae instinctu animae solius orta non solum nihil uoluptatis conferunt carni, sed etiam grauissimis eam languoribus adficientia miserrimae iucunditatis pastu animam tantum nutriunt aegrotantem. et idcirco haec quidem simplici cordis indigent medicina, quae autem carnalia sunt, non nisi duplici quemadmodum diximus ad sanitatem curatione perueniunt. unde puritati studentibus plurimum confert, ut harum carnalium passionum ipsas materias sibi primitus subtrahant, quibus potest uel occasio uel recordatio earundem passionum aegrotanti adhuc animae generari. necesse est enim ut morbo duplici duplex adhibeatur curatio. nam corpori, ne concupiscentia in effectum temptet prorumpere, necessario effigies et materia inliciens subtrahenda est, et animae nihilominus, ne eam uel cogitatione concipiat, adtentior meditatio scripturarum et sollicitudo peruigil ac remotio solitudinis utiliter adponenda. in ceteris autem uitiis humana consortia nihil obsunt, quin immo etiam plurimum conferunt his qui carere eis in ueritate desiderant, quia frequentia hominum magis arguuntur, et dum lacessita crebrius manifestantur, celeri medicina perueniunt ad salutem.
“To make these things clearer not only by argument, as briefly as we can, but also by testimonies of Scripture: gluttony and sexual immorality, though they are in us by nature (for sometimes they arise even without any prompting of the mind, from the mere instigation and itching of the flesh), still need material from outside to be completed, and so come to effect by bodily action. ‘For each one is tempted by his own desire. Then desire, when it has conceived, gives birth to sin; and sin, when it is completed, brings forth death.’ For the first Adam could not have been deceived by gluttony unless he had had the material of food at hand and used it unlawfully; nor is the second tempted without the enticement of some material, when it is said to him: ‘If you are the Son of God, command that these stones become bread.’ That sexual immorality too is carried out only through the body is plain to all, as God says of this spirit to the blessed Job: ‘And his strength is in his loins, and his power in the navel of his belly.’ And therefore these two in particular, which are fulfilled by the service of the flesh, need, besides the spiritual care of the soul, bodily self-control in a special way. For the intention of the mind alone is not enough to blunt their goads (as sometimes happens against anger or sadness and the other passions, which the effort of the mind alone knows how to overcome even without any affliction of the flesh), unless bodily chastisement is added, which is achieved by fasts, vigils, and wearying work; and to these withdrawal to a separate place must be joined. For as they are produced by the fault of both, that is, soul and body, so they cannot be overcome except by the labor of both. And although the blessed apostle declared generally that all vices are fleshly, since he counted enmities, angers, and heresies among the other works of the flesh, we nevertheless distinguish them by a twofold division in order to gather their cures and natures more carefully. For we say that some of them are fleshly and some spiritual. Those are fleshly which belong especially to the comfort and feeling of the flesh, in which the flesh so delights and is fed that it even stirs up quiet minds and sometimes drags them unwilling to consent to its will. Of these the blessed apostle says: ‘Among whom we all once lived in the desires of our flesh, doing the will of the flesh and of the thoughts, and were by nature children of wrath, like the rest.’ We call those spiritual which, arising from the impulse of the soul alone, not only bring no pleasure to the flesh but even afflict it with the most grievous sicknesses, and feed only the sick soul with the food of a most wretched delight. And so these need a simple medicine of the heart; but the fleshly ones come to health only by a twofold cure, as we said. Hence it helps those who strive after purity very much to withdraw from themselves first the very materials of these fleshly passions, from which either occasion or memory of these passions can arise in the soul that is still sick. For a twofold cure must be applied to a twofold disease. From the body the image and material that entice must necessarily be withdrawn, lest desire try to break out into action; and to the soul no less must more attentive meditation on the Scriptures, wakeful vigilance, and the withdrawal of solitude be usefully applied, lest it conceive it even in thought. In the other vices, however, human company does no harm; indeed it helps very much those who truly wish to be free of them, because they are more exposed by the frequent company of men, and, being more often provoked and brought to light, they come to health by a quick medicine.”
Jas 1:14 (quotation, high confidence) · Jas 1:15 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 4:3 (quotation, high confidence) · Job 40:16 (40:11 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Gal 5:20 (allusion, high confidence) · Eph 2:3 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Gluttony and lust, rooted in the body, need bodily discipline and withdrawal as well as care of the soul; the spiritual vices are cured by the heart alone and are even exposed and healed by living among others.
- Jas 1:14–15; Matt 4:3; Job 40:16 (40:11 LXX); Gal 5:19–21; Eph 2:3.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slips; stray full stop): Et at haeo eadem → Et ut haec eadem; unusquisque enim temptaturi a propria → unusquisque enim temptatur a propria; subtrahenda. est, et animae → subtrahenda est, et animae.
Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 5.4 (CSEL 13:122–124; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/4-19/#p-5-4). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-5-4) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).
5.5CSEL 13:124
Ideoque dominus noster Iesus Christus, cum apostoli pronuntietur sententia temptatus fuisse per omnia secundum similitudinem nostram, dicitur tamen absque peccato, id est absque huius passionis contagio, nequaquam scilicet aculeos concupiscentiae carnalis expertus, quibus nos necesse est etiam ignorantes inuitosque conpungi, quippe cui nulla inerat similitudo seminationis uel conceptionis humanae, ita rationem conceptus eius archangelo nuntiante: spiritus sanctus superueniet in te, et uirtus altissimi obumbrabit tibi: ideo et quod ex te nascetur sanctum uocabitur filius dei.
“And therefore our Lord Jesus Christ, though the apostle declares that he was tempted in all things according to our likeness, is yet said to be without sin, that is, without the contagion of this passion. He certainly did not experience the goads of fleshly desire, by which we must be pricked even without knowing or willing it, since there was in him no likeness of human begetting or conception, as the archangel announced the manner of his conception: ‘The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; therefore also the holy one who will be born of you will be called the Son of God.’”
Heb 4:15 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 1:35 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Christ was tempted in all things yet without sin, never feeling the goads of fleshly desire, since his conception was by the Holy Spirit.
- Heb 4:15; Luke 1:35. Cassian's Christological reasoning here is translated as written.
Topics: Christology
Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 5.5 (CSEL 13:124; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/4-19/#p-5-5). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-5-5) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).
5.6CSEL 13:124–127
In illis enim passionibus etiam ipse temptari debuit incorruptam imaginem dei ac similitudinem possidens, in quibus et Adam temptatus est, cum adhuc in illa inuiolata dei imagine perduraret, hoc est gastrimargia, cenodoxia, superbia, non in quibus post praeuaricationem mandati imagine dei ac similitudine uiolata suo iam uitio deuolutus inuoluitur. gastrimargia namque est qua interdicti ligni praesumit edulium, cenodoxia qua dicitur: aperientur oculi uestri, superbia qua dicitur: eritis sicut dii, scientes bonum et malum. in his ergo tribus uitiis etiam dominum saluatorem legimus fuisse temptatum, gastrimargia, cum dicitur ei a diabolo: dic ut lapides isti panes fiant, cenodoxia: si filius dei es, mitte te deorsum, superbia, cum ostendens illi omnia regna mundi et eorum gloriam dicit: haec tibi omnia dabo, si cadens adoraueris me, ut isdem quibus ille temptationum lineis adpetitus nos quoque quemadmodum temptatorem uincere deberemus suo doceret exemplo. ideoque et ille Adam dicitur et iste Adam, ille primus ad ruinam et mortem, hic primus ad resurrectionem et uitam. per illum omne genus hominum condemnatur, per istum omne genus hominum liberatur. ille de rudi atque intacta fingitur terra, hic de Maria uirgine procreatur. huius ergo ut suscipere eum temptationes oportuit, ita excedere necessarium non fuit. nec enim qui gastrimargiam uicerat poterat fornicatione temptari, quae ex illius abundantia ac radice procedit, qua ne ille quidem primus Adam fuisset elisus, nisi ante generatricem eius passionem deceptus inlecebris diaboli recepisset. et ob hoc filius dei non absolute in carne peccati uenisse dicitur, sed in similitudine carnis peccati, quia, cum esset in eo uera caro, manducans scilicet et bibens et dormiens, clauorum quoque confixionem in ueritate suscipiens, peccatum eius quod praeuaricatione contraxit uerum non habuit sed imaginarium. non enim ignitos aculeos concupiscentiae carnalis expertus est, qui etiam nolentibus nobis natura iam administrante consurgunt, sed huius quandam similitudinem naturam participando suscepit. nam cum omnia quae officii nostri sunt in ueritate conpleret et uniuersas infirmitates gestaret humanas, consequenter huic quoque passioni putatus est subiacere, ut per has infirmitates etiam condicionem huius quoque uitii atque peccati uideretur in sua carne portare. denique in his eum tantummodo uitiis diabolus temptat, in quibus et illum primum deceperat, coniciens hunc quoque uelut hominem similiter in ceteris inludendum, si eum in illis quibus priorem deiecerat sensisset elisum. uerum ei secundum iam morbum, qui de radice principalis uitii pullularat, primo certamine confutatus inferre non potuit. uidebat enim nullatenus eum initialem causam huius aegritudinis suscepisse eratque superfluum sperari ab eo fructum peccati, cuius eum semina uel radices nullo modo recepisse cernebat. licet secundum Lucan, qui postremam temptationem illam ponit in qua dicitur: si filius dei es, mitte te deorsum, haec superbiae passio possit intellegi, ita ut illa superior quam Matthaeus tertiam ponit, in qua iuxta praedictum Lucan euangelistam omnia ei regna mundi in puncto temporis ostendens diabolus repromittit, accipiatur passio filargyriae, quod scilicet post gastrimargiae uictoriam fornicatione eum temptare non praeualens ad filargyriam transierit, quam radicem esse malorum omnium nouerat, in qua iterum superatus nullum ei uitium ex his quae sequebantur eam ausus ingerere, quippe quae nouerat de eius radice ac fomite pullulare, ad extremam superbiae transilierit passionem, qua nouerat etiam perfectos quosque deuictis omnibus uitiis posse pulsari, qua etiam uel se ipsum, cum esset Lucifer, uel conplures alios absque ullo incitamento praecedentium passionum de caelestibus meminerat conruisse. iuxta hunc ergo quem praediximus ordinem, qui ab euangelista Luca describitur, etiam ipsa inlicitatio et figura temptationum, quibus uel illum primum uel istum secundum Adam callidissimus adgreditur inimicus, elegantissime congruit. illi namque dicit: aperientur oculi uestri, huic ostendit omnia regna mundi et gloriam eorum. ibi dicit: eritis sicut dii, hic: si filius dei es.
“For he too, possessing the uncorrupted image and likeness of God, had to be tempted in those passions in which Adam also was tempted while he still remained in that inviolate image of God, that is, gluttony, vainglory, and pride; not in those in which, after the transgression of the command, having violated the image and likeness of God, he fell by his own fault and is entangled. For gluttony is that by which he presumed to eat of the forbidden tree; vainglory that by which it is said, ‘Your eyes will be opened’; pride that by which it is said, ‘You will be like gods, knowing good and evil.’ In these three vices, then, we read that the Lord and Savior too was tempted: gluttony, when the devil says to him, ‘Command that these stones become bread’; vainglory, ‘If you are the Son of God, throw yourself down’; pride, when, showing him all the kingdoms of the world and their glory, he says, ‘All these I will give you, if you will fall down and worship me’; so that, being assailed along the same lines of temptation as Adam, he might teach us by his example how we too ought to overcome the tempter. And therefore both the one is called Adam and this one Adam: the former first for ruin and death, the latter first for resurrection and life. Through the former the whole human race is condemned; through the latter the whole human race is set free. The former is formed from rough and untouched earth; the latter is born of the Virgin Mary. It was fitting, then, that he should undergo these temptations; it was not necessary that he should go beyond them. For one who had conquered gluttony could not be tempted by sexual immorality, which comes from its abundance and root; by which not even the first Adam would have been overthrown, had he not, deceived by the devil's enticements, first received the passion that gives birth to it. And for this reason the Son of God is said to have come not simply in the flesh of sin but in the likeness of the flesh of sin; because, though there was true flesh in him, since he ate, drank, and slept, and truly underwent the piercing of the nails, he did not have the sin contracted by the transgression truly, but only in likeness. For he did not experience the fiery goads of fleshly desire, which rise up in us even against our will, nature now bringing them about; but he took on a certain likeness of it by sharing our nature. For since he truly fulfilled everything that belongs to our condition and bore all human weaknesses, he was consequently thought to be subject to this passion too, so that through these weaknesses he might seem to bear in his flesh the condition of this vice and sin as well. Finally, the devil tempts him only in those vices in which he had deceived the first man, conjecturing that this one too, as a man, could likewise be deluded in the others, if he found him overthrown in those in which he had cast down the former. But, refuted in the first contest, he could not bring against him the second disease, which had sprung from the root of the principal vice. For he saw that he had by no means received the initial cause of this sickness, and it was useless to hope for the fruit of sin from one who he saw had in no way received its seeds or roots. Yet according to Luke, who places last the temptation in which it is said, ‘If you are the Son of God, throw yourself down,’ this may be understood as the passion of pride; so that the earlier one, which Matthew places third, in which, according to the evangelist Luke, the devil showed him all the kingdoms of the world in a moment of time and promised them to him, may be taken as the passion of love of money. That is, after the victory over gluttony, unable to tempt him with sexual immorality, he passed to love of money, which he knew to be the root of all evils; and, overcome again in this, not daring to bring upon him any of the vices that follow from it, since he knew they sprang from its root and tinder, he leapt to the last passion, pride, by which he knew that even the perfect could be assailed after all the vices had been conquered; by which he remembered that he himself, when he was Lucifer, and many others had fallen from heaven without any incitement of the preceding passions. According to the order we have mentioned, then, described by the evangelist Luke, even the enticement and form of the temptations by which the most cunning enemy attacks both the first and the second Adam agree most elegantly. For to the former he says, ‘Your eyes will be opened’; to the latter he shows ‘all the kingdoms of the world and their glory.’ There he says, ‘You will be like gods’; here, ‘If you are the Son of God.’”
Gen 3:5 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 4:3 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 4:6 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 4:8 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 4:9 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 4:5 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 4:9 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:45 (allusion, high confidence) · Rom 8:3 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Tim 6:10 (allusion, high confidence) · Isa 14:12 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Christ, the second Adam, was tempted in the same vices as the first Adam, gluttony, vainglory, and pride (or, in Luke's order, love of money and pride), but not in the passions that follow from sin; he came in the likeness of sinful flesh.
- Gen 3:5; Matt 4:3–9; Luke 4:5–12; 1 Cor 15:45–47; Rom 8:3; 1 Tim 6:10; Isa 14:12. Cassian's statement that Christ had true flesh but only the likeness of sin, and did not feel the goads of fleshly desire, is translated as written.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slips; stray letter): eenodoxia qua dicitur → cenodoxia qua dicitur; in his ergo tribus uitiia → in his ergo tribus uitiis; non enim ignitos acaleos concnpisoentiae → non enim ignitos aculeos concupiscentiae; fornicatione eum temptare u non praeualens → fornicatione eum temptare non praeualens; radicem esse maloram omnium → radicem esse malorum omnium; qua etiam uel ae ipsum → qua etiam uel se ipsum.
Topics: Christology
Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 5.6 (CSEL 13:124–127; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/4-19/#p-5-6). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-5-6) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).
5.7CSEL 13:127–128
Et ut de efficientiis ceterarum quoque passionum, quarum narrationem intercidere nos expositio gastrimargiae uel dominicae temptationis necessario conpulit, eodem quo proposueramus ordine disseramus, cenodoxia atque superbia etiam sine ullo consummari solent ministerio corporali. in quo enim egent actione carnali, quae pro coniuentia et uoluntate sola conquirendae laudis et humanae gloriae consequendae abunde ruinam generant animae captiuatae? aut quem effectum habuit corporalem praedicti Luciferi illius antiqua superbia, nisi quod eam tantummodo animo et cogitatione concepit, ita propheta commemorante: qui dicebas in corde tuo: in caelum conscendam, super astra dei ponam solium meum. ascendam super altitudinem nubium, ero similis altissimo? qui sicut huius superbiae neminem habuit incentorem, ita ei consummationem criminis ruinaeque perpetuae cogitatio sola perfecit, et quidem cum adfectatae tyrannidis nulla fuerint opera subsecuta.
“And so that we may discuss the workings of the other passions too, in the same order we had proposed (the explanation of gluttony and of the Lord's temptation necessarily compelled us to interrupt their account): vainglory and pride are usually completed even without any bodily service. For in what do they need fleshly action, since through mere connivance and the will to win praise and gain human glory they abundantly bring about the ruin of the captive soul? Or what bodily effect did the ancient pride of that Lucifer we mentioned have, except that he conceived it only in mind and thought, as the prophet records: ‘You who said in your heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will set my throne above the stars of God; I will ascend above the heights of the clouds, I will be like the Most High’? As he had no one to incite this pride, so thought alone completed the crime and his everlasting ruin, even though no deeds of the tyranny he aimed at followed.”
Isa 14:13 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 14:14 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Vainglory and pride need no bodily action; Lucifer's fall was accomplished by thought alone.
- Isa 14:13–14.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip): animae captiuatae? ant quem → animae captiuatae? aut quem; subseouta → subsecuta.
Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 5.7 (CSEL 13:127–128; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/4-19/#p-5-7). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-5-7) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).
5.8CSEL 13:128–129
Filargyria et ira licet non sint unius naturae (nam prior extra naturam est, sequens uero originale uidetur in nobis seminarium possidere), simili tamen oriuntur modo; extrinsecus siquidem causas conmotionis plerumque concipiunt. etenim frequenter hi qui adhuc infirmiores sunt uel inritatione uel instinctu quorundam in haec se corruisse uitia conqueruntur ac praecipitatos se uel ad iracundiam uel ad filargyriam aliorum prouocatione causantur. quod autem extra naturam sit filargyria, hinc liquido peruidetur, quia nec originale probatur in nobis habere principium nec de materia concipitur, quae pertingit ad animae uel carnis participationem uitaeque substantiam. nihil enim ad usum ac necessitatem naturae conmunis praeter escam cotidianam ac potum certum est peruenire. reliquae uero uniuersae materiae quantolibet studio atque amore seruentur, alienae tamen ab humana indigentia etiam usu uitae ipsius adprobantur. ideoque hoc uelut extra naturam exsistens non nisi tepidos ac male fundatos monachos pulsat, quae autem naturalia sunt etiam probatissimos monachorum et quidem in solitudine conmorantes adtemptare non desinunt. et in tantum hoc uerissimum conprobatur, ut etiam gentes nonnullas ab hac passione, id est filargyriae, liberas omnimodis agnoscamus, quia nequaquam uitii huius aegritudinem usu et consuetudine receperunt. illum quoque priorem mundum qui ante diluuium fuit diutissime concupiscentiae huius rabiem credimus ignorasse. quae etiam in unoquoque nostrum recte abrenuntiante sine ullo labore probatur extingui, cum scilicet uniuersis quis facultatibus abiectis ita expetierit coenobii disciplinam, ut ex eis ne unum quidem denarium sibimet superesse patiatur. cuius rei testes multa hominum milia possumus inuenire, qui cum sub momento breuissimo dispersis omnibus substantiis suis ita hanc eradicauerint passionem, ut ne tenuiter quidem ab ea pulsentur ulterius, nihilominus omni tempore contra gastrimargiam pugnantes, nisi ingenti circumspectione cordis et abstinentia corporis dimicarint, securi esse non possunt.
“Love of money and anger, though they are not of one nature (for the former is outside nature, while the latter seems to have an original seed in us), yet arise in a similar way, since they usually take the causes of their stirring from outside. For those who are still weaker often complain that they have fallen into these vices through the provocation or prompting of others, and plead that they were driven headlong into anger or love of money by others' provocation. That love of money is outside nature is clearly seen from this: it is proved to have no original beginning in us, nor is it conceived from material that belongs to the life of soul or flesh and to the substance of life. For it is certain that nothing reaches the use and necessity of our common nature except daily food and drink. All other materials, however carefully and lovingly they are kept, are shown by the very experience of life to be foreign to human need. And so this vice, as existing outside nature, assails only lukewarm and badly grounded monks, whereas the natural ones do not cease to attack even the most approved monks, even those living in solitude. So true is this proved to be that we know of some nations wholly free from this passion, that is, love of money, because they have never taken on the sickness of this vice by use and habit. We believe too that the earlier world, which existed for a very long time before the flood, did not know the madness of this desire. In each of us who renounces rightly it is proved to be extinguished without any labor, when, having cast away all his possessions, he seeks the discipline of the coenobium in such a way as not to allow even a single denarius to remain to him. We can find many thousands of men as witnesses to this, who, having dispersed all their property in the briefest moment, so rooted out this passion that they are no longer assailed by it even slightly; and yet, fighting against gluttony all the time, they cannot be safe unless they have fought with great watchfulness of heart and abstinence of body.”
Notes and citation
Summary: Love of money, being unnatural, is easily extinguished by true renunciation, unlike the natural vices such as gluttony, which assail even the best monks all their lives.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slips; stray full stop): prior extra. naturam → prior extra naturam; aegritudinem nsa et → aegritudinem usu et; qui ute dihraium init dintissime conenpiscentiae huins rabiem crediraus → qui ante diluuium fuit diutissime concupiscentiae huius rabiem credimus; sine ułło labore probatur extingui, oam scilicet uniuersis quia facultatibus abiectis ita expetierit coenobii I disciplinam, at ex eis → sine ullo labore probatur extingui, cum scilicet uniuersis quis facultatibus abiectis ita expetierit coenobii disciplinam, ut ex eis; substantiis sms ita → substantiis suis ita; ut IDe tenuiter → ut ne tenuiter; nihilominus Omni tempore contra gafitrimargiam → nihilominus omni tempore contra gastrimargiam.
Topics: Ethics
Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 5.8 (CSEL 13:128–129; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/4-19/#p-5-8). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-5-8) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).
5.9CSEL 13:129
Tristitia et acedia nulla quemadmodum superiora diximus accedente extrinsecus prouocatione generari solent. nam solitarios quoque et in heremo constitutos nullique humano conmixtos consortio frequenter atque amarissime uexare noscuntur. quod esse uerissimum, quisque fuerit in solitudine conmoratus et pugnas hominis interioris expertus, ipsis experimentis perfacile conprobabit.
“Sadness and acedia usually arise, as we said above, without any provocation coming from outside. For they are known to trouble frequently and most bitterly even solitaries placed in the desert and mixing with no human company. That this is most true anyone who has lived in solitude and experienced the battles of the inner man will very easily prove by his own experience.”
Notes and citation
Summary: Sadness and acedia arise from within, troubling even solitaries far from all human company.
Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 5.9 (CSEL 13:129; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/4-19/#p-5-9). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-5-9) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).
5.10CSEL 13:129–131
Haec igitur octo uitia licet diuersos ortus ac dissimiles efficientias habeant, sex tamen priora, id est gastrimargia, fornicatio, filargyria, ira, tristitia, acedia quadam inter se cognatione et ut ita dixerim concatenatione conexa sunt, ita ut prioris exuberantia sequenti efficiatur exordium. nam de abundantia gastrimargiae fornicationem, de fornicatione filargyriam, de filargyria iram, de ira tristitiam, de tristitia acediam necesse est pullulare. ideoque simili contra haec modo atque eadem ratione pugnandum est et a praecedentibus semper aduersus sequentes oportet nos inire certamina. facilius enim cuiuslibet arboris noxia latitudo ac proceritas exarescet, si antea radices eius quibus innititur uel nudatae fuerint uel succisae, et infestantes umores aquarum continuo siccabuntur, cum generator earum fons ac profluentes uenae sollerti industria fuerint obturatae. quamobrem ut acedia uincatur, ante superanda tristitia est: ut tristitia propellatur, ira prius est extrudenda: ut extinguatur ira, filargyria calcanda est: ut euellatur filargyria, fornicatio conpescenda est: ut fornicatio subruatur, gastrimargiae est uitium castigandum. residua uero duo, id est cenodoxia et superbia sibi quidem similiter illa qua de superioribus uitiis diximus ratione iunguntur, ita ut incrementum prioris ortus efficiatur alterius (cenodoxiae enim exuberantia superbiae fomitem parit), sed ab illis sex prioribus uitiis penitus dissident nec simili cum eis societate foederantur, siquidem non solum nullam ex illis occasionem suae generationis accipiant, sed etiam contrario modo atque ordine suscitentur. nam illis euulsis haec uehementius fruticant et illorum morte uiuacius pullulant atque subcrescunt. unde etiam diuerso modo ab his duobus uitiis inpugnamur. in unumquodque enim illorum sex uitiorum tunc incidimus, cum a praecedentibus eorum fuerimus elisi, in haec uero duo uictores et uel maxime post triumphos periclitamur incurrere. omnia igitur uitia, quemadmodum incremento praecedentium generantur, ita illorum deminutione purgantur. et hac ratione ut superbia possit explodi, cenodoxia est praefocanda, et ita semper prioribus superatis sequentia conquiescent et extinctione praecedentium residuae passiones absque labore marcescent. et licet haec quae praediximus octo uitia illa qua conmemorauimus ratione inuicem sibi conexa atque permixta sint, specialius tamen in quattuor coniugationes et copulas diuiduntur. gastrimargiae namque fornicatio peculiari consortio foederatur: filargyriae ira, tristitiae acedia, cenodoxiae superbia familiariter coniugatur.
“These eight vices, then, though they have different origins and unlike workings, yet the first six, that is, gluttony, sexual immorality, love of money, anger, sadness, and acedia, are connected with one another by a kind of kinship and, so to speak, a chain, so that the excess of the one becomes the beginning of the next. For from an abundance of gluttony sexual immorality must spring, from sexual immorality love of money, from love of money anger, from anger sadness, from sadness acedia. And therefore we must fight against them in the same way and by the same method, and always begin the contest against the later ones from the earlier. For the harmful breadth and height of any tree will more easily wither if the roots on which it rests have first been laid bare or cut; and troublesome waters will at once dry up when the spring that produces them and the flowing veins have been skilfully stopped. Therefore, to conquer acedia, sadness must first be overcome; to drive out sadness, anger must first be expelled; to extinguish anger, love of money must be trampled; to root out love of money, sexual immorality must be checked; to overthrow sexual immorality, the vice of gluttony must be chastened. The remaining two, however, that is, vainglory and pride, are joined to each other in a similar way to that which we described for the earlier vices, so that the growth of the first becomes the origin of the second (for an excess of vainglory produces the tinder of pride); but they differ entirely from those first six vices and are not bound to them in a similar alliance. For they not only take no occasion of their origin from them, but are even stirred up in a contrary manner and order: when those have been rooted out, these sprout more vigorously, and from their death they spring up and grow more lively. Hence we are also attacked by these two vices in a different way. We fall into each of those six vices when we have been overthrown by the ones preceding it; but we are in danger of falling into these two when we are victorious, and especially after triumphs. All vices, then, as they are produced by the growth of the preceding ones, so are they purged by their diminution. And on this principle, in order that pride may be driven out, vainglory must be stifled; and so, the earlier always being overcome, the following ones will subside, and with the extinction of the preceding ones the remaining passions will wither without labor. And although these eight vices we have mentioned are connected and intermixed with one another in the way we described, they are more particularly divided into four pairs and couplings. For sexual immorality is bound to gluttony in a special alliance; anger to love of money; acedia to sadness; pride is closely coupled with vainglory.”
Notes and citation
Summary: The first six vices form a chain, each growing out of the one before, so they must be fought from the root, beginning with gluttony; vainglory and pride, by contrast, grow out of victories over the others.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slips; missing punctuation; stray full stop): gastrimargia,. fornicatio → gastrimargia, fornicatio; ut Media uincatur → ut acedia uincatur; fornicatio conpescenda est ut fornicatio → fornicatio conpescenda est: ut fornicatio; aictorea → uictores; eztinctione → extinctione; fiiargyriae ira, tristitiae Media → filargyriae ira, tristitiae acedia; coDiugatur → coniugatur.
Topics: Ethics
Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 5.10 (CSEL 13:129–131; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/4-19/#p-5-10). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-5-10) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).