Sermons to the People 153.1–153.14
Latin text: PL 38 (Latin text: Migne, PL 38, digitized by Open Greek and Latin (patrologia_latina-dev, University of Leipzig), CC BY-SA 4.0).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0). Compare: NPNF 1/6: Sermons on Selected Lessons of the New Testament (R. G. MacMullen, ed., 1888).
Chapter 153
153.1PL 38:489
Audivimus, concorditerque respondimus, et Deo nostro consona voce cantavimus: Beatus vir quem tu erudieris, Domine, et ex lege tua docueris eum ( Psal. XCIII, 12 ). Silentium si præbeatis, audietis. Non invenit locum sapientia, ubi non est patientia. Nos loquimur, sed erudit Deus: nos loquimur, sed Dcus docet. Non enim beatus dictus est quem docet homo, sed quem tu erudieris, Domine. Nos plantare possumus et rigare: sed Dei est incrementum darc ( I Cor. III, 7). Qui plantat et qui rigat, forinsecus operatur: qui dat incrementum, intrinsccus opitulatur. Quæ nobis lectio de sancti Apostoli Epistola proposita sit ad loquendum, quam difficilis, quam latebrosa, quam ( si non intelligatur aut male intelligatur ) periculosa; puto, fratres, imo scio, quia nobiscum recitaretur, audistis; et fluctuastis, si advertistis; aut si aliqui et intellexistis, quam sit arduum sine dubitatione vidistis. Hanc itaque lectionem totumque ipsum molestum et obscurum, sed intelligentibus salubrem Epistolæ Apostoli locum suscepimus, adjuvante misericordia Dei, exponere disserendo. Charitati vestræ debitores nos esse scio, exactorcs vos esse sentio. Quemadmodum nos, ut ista percipiatis, oramus: sic et vos orate, ut ea vobis explicare valeamus. Si enim oratio nostra concordet; et vos faciet Deus idoncos auditores, et nos debiti hujus fidelissimos redditores.
We have heard, and responded in harmony, and sung to our God with one voice: “Blessed is the man whom you instruct, O Lord, and teach from your law.” If you give silence, you will hear. Wisdom finds no place where there is no patience. We speak, but God instructs; we speak, but God teaches. For he is not called blessed whom man teaches, but “whom you instruct, O Lord.” We can plant and water: but it is God’s to give the growth. He who plants and he who waters works from outside; he who gives the growth helps from within. How difficult, how obscure, how dangerous (if it is not understood, or is misunderstood) is the reading from the holy apostle’s Epistle set before us to speak about, you heard, I think, brothers, or rather I know, when it was read with us; and you wavered, if you were paying attention; or if some of you did understand, you certainly saw how hard it is. So we have undertaken, with the help of God’s mercy, to explain in discussion this reading and the whole of this troublesome and obscure passage of the apostle’s Epistle, healthful though it is to those who understand it. I know that we are debtors to your Charity; I feel that you are exacting creditors. As we pray that you may grasp these things, so you too pray that we may be able to explain them to you. For if our prayer is in harmony, God will make you fit hearers, and us most faithful payers of this debt.
Ps 94:12 (93:12 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 3:6–7 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Augustine introduces the difficult passage Rom 7:5–13, reminding his hearers that God teaches within, and asks for their prayers.
- Migne’s title: “Openly against the Manichees, and tacitly against the Pelagians.” Quotations: Ps 94:12 (Vulgate 93:12), sung that day; 1 Cor 3:6–7.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slips; word divided by a stray mark): erudieris,Domine, et ex lege tua docucria eum → erudieris, Domine, et ex lege tua docueris eum; Silentium si præbeatis, audicLis → Silentium si præbeatis, audietis; Non eniin beatus → Non enim beatus; ad loquendum. quamdifficilis, quam latebrosa. quam ( si non intelligatur ant malc intelligatur ) pcriculosa → ad loquendum, quam difficilis, quam latebrosa, quam ( si non intelligatur aut male intelligatur ) periculosa; ut ista per. cipiatis → ut ista percipiatis; nos debili hujus → nos debiti hujus.
Topics: Scripture and canon
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 153.1 (PL 38:489; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/153-1/#p-153-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-153-1) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
153.2PL 38:489
Cum enim essemus in carne, ait Apostolus, passiones peccatorum quæ per Legem sunt, operabantur in membris nostris, ut fructum ferrent morti. Hic videtur ( quod non intelligentibus primum ct grande periculum est ) Apostolus reprehendere et culpare legem Dei. Dicit aliquis, Absit hoc ab animo qualiscumque christiani: quis hoc vel insanus audeat de Apostolo suspicari? Et tamen, fratres mei, verba ista male intellecta, fomitem insaniæ furori Manichæorum subministrarunt. Manichæi enim legem Dei per Moysen datam, dicunt non a Deo datam, et eam Evangelio contrariam esse contendunt. Et quando cum eis agitur, his testimoniis apostoli Pauli qux non intelligunt, conantur convincerc, quid dicam, catholicos non intelligentes, et non potius negligentes? Non enim multum est, si quis velit esse diligens, post calumnias ab hæretico auditas, saltem considerare in codice circumstantiam lectionis. Quod si fecerit; ibi mox inveniet unde adversarium loquacem redarguat, unde hostes Legis rebellesque prosternat. Etsi enim tardus est ad intelligenda verba Apostoli, manifesta ibi laus est expressa legis Dei.
“For when we were in the flesh,” says the apostle, “the passions of sins which were through the Law were at work in our members, to bear fruit for death.” Here the apostle seems (and for those who do not understand, this is the first and great danger) to rebuke and blame the law of God. Someone says: “Far be this from the mind of any Christian whatever: who, even a madman, would dare to suspect this of the apostle?” And yet, my brothers, these words, misunderstood, have supplied tinder to the raging madness of the Manichees. For the Manichees say that the law of God given through Moses was not given by God, and they contend that it is contrary to the Gospel. And when one deals with them, they try with these testimonies of the apostle Paul, which they do not understand, to refute Catholics who do not understand them; or should I rather say, who are negligent? For it is no great matter, if anyone wants to be diligent, after hearing the heretic’s slanders, at least to look in the book at the context of the reading. If he does so, he will soon find there the means to refute the talkative adversary, to throw down the enemies and rebels against the Law. For even if he is slow to understand the apostle’s words, a clear praise of the law of God is expressed there.
Rom 7:5 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The Manichees use Rom 7:5 to claim that the Law of Moses is evil and not from God; anyone who reads the context will find the apostle praising the Law.
- Quotation: Rom 7:5.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's marginal heading left in the text; OCR slip; OCR slip; stray footnote number; OCR slip; words run together; OCR slips; words run together; OCR slip): lloc loco abutuntur Manichœi. - Cum enim → Cum enim; per Legem cunt, operabantur in membris nostris, ut fructumferrent → per Legem sunt, operabantur in membris nostris, ut fructum ferrent; grande periculum csl → grande periculum est; chrUtiani 1: → christiani:; fratres rnci → fratres mei; fomitem insaniæ fumri → fomitem insaniæ furori; Manichæienim lcgem → Manichæi enim legem; si quis velitesse tiiigens → si quis velit esse diligens; expressa h'gis Dei → expressa legis Dei.
Topics: Heresy
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 153.2 (PL 38:489; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/153-1/#p-153-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-153-2) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
153.3PL 38:489–490
Videte enim prius et advertite. Cum enim essemus in carne, ait, passiones peccatorum quæ per Legem sunt, operabantur. Hic jam Manichæus erigit cervicem, exaltat cornua. impetit te, facit impetum: Ecce, inquit. passiones peccatorum quæ per Legem sunt. Quomodo bona est Lex, per quam in nobis sunt passiones peccalorum, et operantur in membris nostris, ut fructum ferant morti? Lege, aliquantum progredere, totum audi patienter, etsi non intelligenter. Hoc enim quod ait, Passiones peccatorum quæ per Legem sunt, operabantur iti membris nostris, multum est ut intelligas: sed prius esto mecum Legis laudator, ct tunc fieri mereberis intellector. Clausum cor habes, et clavem accusas? Ecce interim quod non intelligimus, paululum seponamus, ad laudem Legis quæ aperta est veniamus. Passiones, inquit, peccatorum, quæ per Legem sunt, operabantur in membris nostris, ut fructum ferrent morti. Nunc ergo evacuati sumus a Lege mortis, in qua detinebamur, ita ut serviamus in novitate spiritus, et non in vetustate litteræ. Adhuc videtur Legem arguere, culpare, improbare, detestari: sed non intelligentibus. Cum enim dicit, Cum essemus in carne, passiones peccatorum quœ per Legem sunt, operabantur in membris nostris, ut fructum ferrent morti. Nunc ergo evacuati sumus a Lege mortis, in qua detinebamur, ita ut serviamus in novitate spiritus, et non in vetustate litteræ, quasi utique videtur Legem accusare atque culpare. Vidit hoc et ipse, vidit, sensit se non intelligi, et contra obscuritatem verborum suorum cogitationes hominum commoveri: sensit quid possis dicere, sensit quid possis contradicere; et prior hoc voluit dicere, ut tu non invenias quod diceres.
First see and attend. “For when we were in the flesh,” he says, “the passions of sins which were through the Law were at work.” Here the Manichee raises his neck, lifts his horns, goes for you, charges: “See,” he says, “the passions of sins which were through the Law. How is the Law good, through which the passions of sins are in us and are at work in our members to bear fruit for death?” Read on, go forward a little, hear the whole patiently, even if not understandingly. For what he says, “The passions of sins which were through the Law were at work in our members,” is a great deal for you to understand: but first be with me a praiser of the Law, and then you will deserve to become one who understands it. Your heart is shut, and you blame the key? See, meanwhile let us set aside for a little what we do not understand, and come to the praise of the Law, which is plain. “The passions,” he says, “of sins which were through the Law were at work in our members, to bear fruit for death. But now we have been released from the Law of death, by which we were held, so that we serve in newness of spirit and not in oldness of the letter.” He still seems to accuse the Law, to blame it, disapprove of it, detest it: but only to those who do not understand. For when he says, “When we were in the flesh, the passions of sins which were through the Law were at work in our members, to bear fruit for death. But now we have been released from the Law of death, by which we were held, so that we serve in newness of spirit and not in oldness of the letter,” he does seem to accuse and blame the Law. He saw this himself; he saw it; he sensed that he would not be understood, and that people’s thoughts would be stirred against the obscurity of his words: he sensed what you might say, he sensed what you might object; and he chose to say it first, so that you would find nothing to say.
Rom 7:5–6 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The Manichee charges that Rom 7:5–6 condemns the Law; Augustine asks him to read on, since Paul foresaw the objection and answered it himself.
- Quotations: Rom 7:5–6.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's marginal heading left in the text; OCR slip; OCR slips; OCR slips; words run together; stray mark; words run together): Manichœorum calumnia refellenda ex consequentibus. Videte → Videte; essemus iacornu, ait, passiones peccatorum quæ per Legemsunt,. perabantur → essemus in carne, ait, passiones peccatorum quæ per Legem sunt, operabantur; erigit cervicem,exaltnt cornua → erigit cervicem, exaltat cornua; totum audi paticnter, ctsi → totum audi patienter, etsi; Passiones peccatorum quas per Legem sunt → Passiones peccatorum quæ per Legem sunt; prius csto mecum → prius esto mecum; Legis quai aperta est → Legis quæ aperta est; Passiones, inquit, peccalorunt, quæ per Legem sunt, operabantur in membrisnostris → Passiones, inquit, peccatorum, quæ per Legem sunt, operabantur in membris nostris; a Lege mortis, inqua detinebamur, ita ut serviamus in novitate spiritus, et non invetustatelitteræ → a Lege mortis, in qua detinebamur, ita ut serviamus in novitate spiritus, et non in vetustate litteræ; Legem arluere → Legem arguere; non invenias quod,diceres → non invenias quod diceres.
Topics: Heresy
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 153.3 (PL 38:489–490; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/153-1/#p-153-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-153-3) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
153.4PL 38:490
Quid ergo dicemus, inquit? Hoc sequitur. Quid ergo dicemus? Lex peccatum eat? Absit. Uno verbo Legem absolvit, Legis accusatorem damnavit. Auctoritatem Apostoli contra me proferebas, o Manichæe, et dicebas mihi, cum Legem reprehenderes, Ecce audi Apostolum, lege Apostolum: Passiones peccatorum quœ per Legem sunt, operabantur in membris nostris, ut fructum ferrent morti. Nunc ergo evacuati sumus a Lege mortis, in qua detinebamur, ita ut serviamus in novitate spiritus, et non in vetustate litteræ. Jactabas te, clamabas, dicebas, audi, lege, vide: ista dixeras, et jam verso tergo ire cupiebas. Exspecta, audivi te, audi me: imo nec ego te, nec tu me; sed ambo simul audiamus Apostolum, qui solvit se, et alligat te. Quid ergo dicemus, inquit? Lex peccatum est? Hoc dicebas, Lex peccatum est, hoc nempe dicebas. Ecce audisti quod dicebas, audi quod dicas. Legem Dci peccatum esse dicebas, quando eam cæcus ct improvidus reprehendebas. Errasti: vidit Paulus errorem tuum. Quod dicebas, ipse dixit. Quid ergo dicemus? Lex peccatum est? Quod dicebas, hoc dicimus? Lex peccatum est? Absit. Si Apostoli sequebaris auctoritatem, appende verbum, et cape inde consilium. Audi, Lex peccatum eat? Absit. Audi, Absit. Si Apostolum sequeris, si ejus auctoritatem plurimi pendis, audi, Absit: et quod sentiebas, a te absit. Quid ergo dicemus? Quid dicemus? quia dixi, Passiones peccatorum quœ per Legem sunt, operabantur in membris nostris, ut fructum ferrent morti; quia dixi, Evacuati sumus a Lege mortis, in qua detinebamur; quia dixi, Serviamus in novitate spiritus, et non in vetustate litteræ: Lex peccatum est? Absit. Quare ergo, Apostole, tanta illa dixisti?
“What then shall we say?” he says. This follows. “What then shall we say? Is the Law sin? Far from it.” With one word he acquitted the Law and condemned the Law’s accuser. You were bringing the apostle’s authority against me, O Manichee, and saying to me as you found fault with the Law: “See, hear the apostle, read the apostle: The passions of sins which were through the Law were at work in our members to bear fruit for death. But now we have been released from the Law of death, by which we were held, so that we serve in newness of spirit and not in oldness of the letter.” You were boasting, shouting, saying, “Hear, read, see”: you had said this, and now you wanted to turn your back and go. Wait: I have heard you; hear me: or rather, neither I you nor you me, but let us both hear the apostle together, who frees himself and binds you. “What then shall we say?” he says. “Is the Law sin?” This is what you were saying, “The Law is sin”; this is surely what you were saying. See, you have heard what you were saying: hear what you should say. You said that the law of God was sin, when, blind and heedless, you found fault with it. You were wrong: Paul saw your error. What you were saying, he said himself. “What then shall we say? Is the Law sin?” Are we saying what you were saying, “The Law is sin”? “Far from it.” If you were following the apostle’s authority, weigh the word and take counsel from it. Hear: “Is the Law sin? Far from it.” Hear: “Far from it.” If you follow the apostle, if you value his authority most highly, hear “Far from it”; and let what you thought be far from you. “What then shall we say?” What shall we say, because I said, “The passions of sins which were through the Law were at work in our members, to bear fruit for death”; because I said, “We have been released from the Law of death, by which we were held”; because I said, “that we may serve in newness of spirit and not in oldness of the letter”? “Is the Law sin? Far from it.” Why then, apostle, did you say such great things?
Rom 7:5–7 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Paul himself raised the Manichee’s objection, “Is the Law sin?”, and answered “Far from it,” so whoever appeals to his authority must accept that answer.
- Quotations: Rom 7:5–7.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's marginal heading left in the text; OCR slip; OCR slip; words run together; OCR slips; words run together): Apostolus ipse Legis reprehensorts ibidem damnat.- Quid ergo → Quid ergo; contra me proferebas, a Manichxe → contra me proferebas, o Manichæe; Passionea peccatorum quœ per Legem sunt, operabantur in membris nostris, utfructum → Passiones peccatorum quœ per Legem sunt, operabantur in membris nostris, ut fructum; imo nee ego te, nee tu me → imo nec ego te, nec tu me; Huc dicebas, Lex peccatum est → Hoc dicebas, Lex peccatum est; Quod dicebas, boc dicimus? → Quod dicebas, hoc dicimus?; nt fructum ferrent morti; quia dixi → ut fructum ferrent morti; quia dixi; Serviamus innovitate spiritus → Serviamus in novitate spiritus.
Topics: Heresy
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 153.4 (PL 38:490; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/153-1/#p-153-4). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-153-4) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
153.5PL 38:490
Lex absit ut sit peccatum: Sed peccatum, inquit, non cognovi, nisi per Legem. Nam concupiscentiam nesciebam, nisi Lex diceret, Non concupisces. Jam modo interrogo te, Manichæe, modo te interrogo, responde mihi. Mala est Lex quæ dicit, Non concupisces? Hoc nec luxuriosus mihi et nequam aliquis responderit Etenim et ipsi homines flagitiosi quando reprehenduntur, erubescunt; et quando sunt inter castos, lascivire non audent. Si ergo malam dicis esse Legem quæ dicit, Non concupisces; impune vis concupiscere; accusas Legem, quia percutit libidinem. Fratres mei, si non audiremus Apostolum dicentem, Lex peccatum est? Absit; sed tantummodo verba Legis commemorantem, ubi dictum est, Non concupisces: etiam Legem illo non laudante, nos tamen laudare dcberemus: illam laudare, nos accusare. Ecce Lex, ecce desuper tuba divina clamat homini, Non concupisces. Non concupisces, reprehende si potes; fac, si reprehendere non potes. Audisti, Non concupisces: reprehendere non audes. Quia bonum est quod dixit, Non concupisces; malum est concupiscere. Malum culpat Lex, a tuo malo te prohibet Lex. Ergo concupiscere malum culpat Lex, a tuo malo te prohibet Lex. Ergo fac quod jubet Lex, noli facere quod vetat Lex, noli concupiscere.
Far be it that the Law should be sin. “But I did not know sin,” he says, “except through the Law. For I did not know desire, unless the Law had said, You shall not desire.” Now I ask you, Manichee, now I ask you: answer me. Is the Law evil which says, “You shall not desire”? Not even some debauched and worthless man would answer me so. For even outrageous men blush when they are rebuked, and when they are among the chaste they do not dare to be wanton. If, then, you say that the Law is evil which says, “You shall not desire,” you want to desire with impunity; you accuse the Law because it strikes at lust. My brothers, if we did not hear the apostle saying, “Is the Law sin? Far from it,” but only quoting the words of the Law, where it is said, “You shall not desire,” then even if he did not praise the Law, we ought still to praise it: to praise it, and to accuse ourselves. See the Law; see, from above the divine trumpet cries to man, “You shall not desire.” “You shall not desire”: find fault with it if you can; do it, if you cannot find fault with it. You have heard, “You shall not desire”: you do not dare to find fault with it. Because what it said, “You shall not desire,” is good, desiring is evil. The Law blames evil; the Law forbids you your own evil. So the Law blames the evil of desiring; the Law forbids you your own evil. So do what the Law commands; do not do what the Law forbids: do not desire.
Rom 7:7 (quotation, high confidence) · Exod 20:17 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: No one, not even a debauched man, would call “You shall not desire” evil; a Manichee who does so wants to desire with impunity.
- Quotations: Rom 7:7 (Exod 20:17).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slip; missing space; OCR slips; stray mark): peccatum, inquit, npn cognovi, nisi per Legem.Nam → peccatum, inquit, non cognovi, nisi per Legem. Nam; Huc nec luxuriosus mihi et nequam aliquis responderiL → Hoc nec luxuriosus mihi et nequam aliquis responderit; malam dicis csse Legem → malam dicis esse Legem; Ecce Lex. ecce desuper → Ecce Lex, ecce desuper; Non concupisces t reprehendere → Non concupisces: reprehendere.
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 153.5 (PL 38:490; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/153-1/#p-153-5). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-153-5) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
153.6PL 38:490–491
Sed quid ait Apostolus? Concupiscentiam nesciebam, nisi Lex diceret, Non concupisces. Ibam enim post concupiscentiam meam, et qua trahebat currebam, ejusque illecebras blandas, et ex carnali suavitate jucundas magnam felicitatem arbitrabar. Laudatur enim peccator, ait Lex, in desideriis animœ suœ; et qui iniqua gerit, benedicitur. Invenis hominem concupiscentias suas carnales sectantem, totumque se illis servum donantem, aucupari undique voluptates, fornicari, inebriari; non dico amplius; fornicari, inquam, inebriari. Hæc dixi quæ licite committuntur, sed non Dei legibus. Quis enim aliquando ad judicem ductus est, quia meretricis lupanar intravit? Quis aliquando in publicis tribunalibus accusatus est, quia per suas lyristrias lascivus immundusque defluxit? Quis aliquando habens uxorem, quia ancillam suam vitiavit, crimen invenit? Sed in foro, non in coelo; in lege mundi, non in lege Creatoris mundi. Luxuriosus autem, immundus atque lascivus felix dicitur abundare voluptatibus, frui deliciis. Jamvero si se ctiam vino ingurgitet, si bibat mensuras sine mensura; parum est quia non invenit crimen, etiam viri fortis accipit nomen: tanto nequior, quanto sub poculo invictior. Cum laudantur ista, et dicitur, Felix est, magnus est, bene est illi; et non solum hoc non putatur esse peccatum, sed etiam putatur vel Dei donum, vel certe suave, blandum et licitum bonum: procedit lex Dei, et dicit, Non concupisces. Ille homo qui putabat magnum bonum esse, magnamque felicitatem existimabat, ea quæ posset, suæ concupiscentiæ non negare, sequi qua trahit; audit, Non concupisces; et cognoscit esse peccatum. Deus dixit, homo audivit, Deo credidit, peccatum suum vidit; quod bonum putabat, malum esse cognovit: voluit frenare concupiscentiam, non ire post eam, strinxit se, conatus est, victus est. Qui fuit antea nescius malorum suorum, factus est doctus, et pejus cst victus: cœpit esse non solum peccator, sed etiam prævaricator. Peccator enim et antea crat: sed antequam Legem audiret, peccatorem se esse nesciebat. Legem audivit, peccatum vidit; conatus est vincere, superatus atque prostratus est; factus est et Legis prævaricator, qui fuit antea nescius peccator. Hoc dicit Apostolus: Lex peccatum est? Absit. Sed peccatum non cognovi, nisi per Legem. Nam concupiscentiam nesciebam nisi Lex diceret, Non concupisces.
But what does the apostle say? “I did not know desire, unless the Law had said, You shall not desire.” For I went after my desire and ran where it dragged me, and I thought its pleasant enticements, delightful with carnal sweetness, a great happiness. “For the sinner is praised,” the Law says, “in the desires of his soul, and he who does wicked things is blessed.” You find a man pursuing his carnal desires and giving himself over to them wholly as their slave, hunting pleasures everywhere, committing fornication, getting drunk; I say no more: committing fornication, I say, getting drunk. I have named these things, which are committed lawfully, but not by God’s laws. For who was ever brought before a judge because he entered a harlot’s brothel? Who was ever accused in the public courts because he melted away, wanton and unclean, among his harp-girls? Who that had a wife was ever found guilty of a crime because he defiled his slave-girl? But that is in the forum, not in heaven; in the law of the world, not in the law of the world’s Creator. And the debauched, unclean, wanton man is called happy, abounding in pleasures, enjoying delights. Now if he also gorges himself with wine, if he drinks measures without measure, it is not enough that he is charged with no crime; he even gets the name of a strong man: the more wicked, the more unconquered over his cup. When these things are praised, and it is said, “He is happy, he is great, he is doing well,” and not only is this not thought to be sin, but it is even thought to be a gift of God, or at least a sweet, pleasant, and lawful good, the law of God comes forward and says, “You shall not desire.” That man, who thought it a great good and reckoned it a great happiness not to deny his desire whatever he could, but to follow where it dragged him, hears, “You shall not desire”; and he recognizes that it is sin. God spoke, man heard, believed God, saw his sin; what he thought good he recognized to be evil: he wanted to rein in his desire, not to go after it; he held himself in, he tried, he was conquered. He who before was ignorant of his evils was made knowing, and, worse, was conquered: he began to be not only a sinner but also a transgressor. For he was a sinner before too; but before he heard the Law he did not know he was a sinner. He heard the Law, saw his sin; he tried to conquer, was overcome and thrown down; and he who before was an unknowing sinner became also a transgressor of the Law. This is what the apostle says: “Is the Law sin? Far from it. But I did not know sin except through the Law. For I did not know desire, unless the Law had said, You shall not desire.”
Rom 7:7 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 10:3 (9:24 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Society praises the drunkard and lets a married man use harlots or his slave-girl without legal penalty, but God’s Law says “You shall not desire”; hearing it, the sinner recognizes his sin, tries to resist, fails, and becomes a transgressor.
- Augustine contrasts Roman law, which did not punish a married man for relations with prostitutes or his own slave, with God’s law; translated as written. “The Law says” introduces Ps 10:3 (Vulgate 9:24), Scripture in a broad sense. Quotations: Rom 7:7; Ps 10:3 (Vulgate 9:24).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slip; missing space; missing space; stray mark; words run together; words run together; OCR slip): carnales sectantem,totumqiie → carnales sectantem, totumque; fornicari,inebriari; non dicoampJius; fornicari, inquam, inebriari.Hæc → fornicari, inebriari; non dico amplius; fornicari, inquam, inebriari. Hæc; Quis aliquando iiabens uxorem → Quis aliquando habens uxorem; Luxuriosus autem,immundus → Luxuriosus autem, immundus; procedit lex Dei,. et dicit → procedit lex Dei, et dicit; non ireposteam → non ire post eam; nescius malorum suoium → nescius malorum suorum; scil etiam prævaricator.Peccator → sed etiam prævaricator. Peccator; concupiscentiam uesciebam → concupiscentiam nesciebam.
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 153.6 (PL 38:490–491; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/153-1/#p-153-6). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-153-6) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
153.7PL 38:491
Occasione autem accepta, peccatum per mandatum operatum est in me omnem concupiscentiam. Minor erat concupiscentia, quando ante Legem securus peccabas, nunc autem oppositis tibi obicibus Legis, fluvius concupiscentiæ quasi frenatus est paululum, non siccatus: sed increscente impetu qui te ducebat obicibus nullis, obruit te obicibus ruptis. Concupiscentia tua minor erat, quando tuam movebat libidinem, omnis est autem quando transcendit et Legem. Vis nosse quam magna sit? Vide quid ruperit: Non concupisces. Non homo dixit, Deus dixit, Creator dixit, Judex æternus dixit, non quicumque dixit. Fac ergo quod dixit. Non facis? observa judicantem qui dixit. Sed quid facias, o homo? Ideo non vicisti, quia de te præsumpsisti.
“But sin, taking occasion through the commandment, worked in me every desire.” Desire was less when before the Law you sinned without a care; but now, with the barriers of the Law set against you, the river of desire was checked a little, as it were, not dried up: but as its force grew, the river which used to carry you along with no barriers has overwhelmed you, bursting the barriers. Your desire was less when it stirred your lust; but it is complete when it overleaps even the Law. Do you want to know how great it is? See what it has burst through: “You shall not desire.” Not a man said it; God said it, the Creator said it, the eternal Judge said it; not just anyone said it. So do what he said. You do not do it? Watch out for the judge who said it. But what are you to do, O man? You did not conquer because you presumed on yourself.
Rom 7:8 (quotation, high confidence) · Exod 20:17 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The commandment checked desire like a dam, but desire, growing stronger, burst it and overwhelmed the sinner, who failed because he relied on himself.
- Quotations: Rom 7:8; Exod 20:17.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's marginal heading left in the text; OCR slips; OCR slip; OCR slips): Concupiscentia per Legem aucta, non victa.- Occasione autem accepta, peccatum per mandatum operatum eat iit me → Occasione autem accepta, peccatum per mandatum operatum est in me; ante Legem securus peccahas → ante Legem securus peccabas; fluvius concup!scentiæ → fluvius concupiscentiæ; paululum, non siccalus → paululum, non siccatus; omnis est autcm quando transcendit et Logem → omnis est autem quando transcendit et Legem; Vis nosse qnam magna sit? Vide quid ruperit s Non → Vis nosse quam magna sit? Vide quid ruperit: Non; Fac ergn quod dixit → Fac ergo quod dixit; Ideo non vicisti. qui:. de te → Ideo non vicisti, quia de te.
Topics: Ethics
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 153.7 (PL 38:491; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/153-1/#p-153-7). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-153-7) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
153.8PL 38:491
Attende ergo nunc verba superiora, quoe videbantur obscura: Cum enim essemus in carne. Verba quæ superiora diximus, unde coepit lectio quæ obscura videbatur, attendite: Cum enim essemus in carne, passiones peccatorum quæ per Legem sunt. Unde per Legem sunt? Quia eramus in carne. Quid est, quia eramus in carne? Præsumebamus de carne. Num enim qui loquebatur Apostolus, jam exierat de ista carne, aut eis loquebatur qui jam exierant morte de ista carne? Non ulique; sed secundum hujus vitæ modum, et qui loquebatur, et quibus loquebatur, in carne crant. Quid ergo est, Cum essemus in carne; nisi, cum de carne præsumeremus, hoc est, de nobis confideremus? Homini enim dictum est, et de hominibus dictum est, Videbit omnis caro salutare Dei. Quid est, Videbit omnis caro; nisi, videbit omnis homo? Et quid est, Verbum caro factum eat; nisi, Verbum homo factum est? Non enim Verbum et caro erat, et anima ibi non erat: sed carnis nomine homo significatus est, in eo quod legitur, Verbum caro factum est. Ergo Cum essemus in carne, id est, in concupiscentiis carnis versaremur, ibique totam spem nostram tanquam in nobis poneremus: passiones peccatorum, quæ per legem sunt, auctæ sunt per legem. Prohibendo enim fecerunt legis prævaricalorem; quia ille qui prævaricator est factus, Deum non habuit adjutorem. Operabantur ergo in membris nostris, ut fructum ferrent, cui, nisi morti? Si damnandus erat peccator, quam spem habet prævaricator?
So attend now to the earlier words, which seemed obscure: “For when we were in the flesh.” Attend to the words I spoke of earlier, with which the reading that seemed obscure began: “For when we were in the flesh, the passions of sins which were through the Law.” How were they through the Law? Because we were in the flesh. What is “because we were in the flesh”? We presumed on the flesh. For had the apostle who was speaking already left this flesh, or was he speaking to those who had already left this flesh by death? Certainly not; according to the manner of this life, both the one who spoke and those to whom he spoke were in the flesh. What then is “When we were in the flesh,” but “when we presumed on the flesh,” that is, trusted in ourselves? For it was said to man, and said of men, “All flesh will see the salvation of God.” What is “All flesh will see,” but “Every man will see”? And what is “The Word was made flesh,” but “The Word was made man”? For it is not that the Word and flesh were there and no soul was there: but by the name of flesh man is meant in what we read, “The Word was made flesh.” So “when we were in the flesh,” that is, when we lived in the desires of the flesh and placed all our hope there, as if in ourselves, “the passions of sins which were through the law” were increased through the law. For by forbidding they made a transgressor of the law, because he who was made a transgressor did not have God as his helper. So they “were at work in our members, to bear fruit”: for whom, but for death? If the sinner was to be condemned, what hope has the transgressor?
Rom 7:5 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 40:5 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 3:6 (quotation, medium confidence) · John 1:14 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: “In the flesh” means trusting in oneself, as “flesh” often means man in Scripture; for those who so trust, the Law only increased sin and made them transgressors bound for death.
- Quotations: Rom 7:5; Isa 40:5 (Luke 3:6); John 1:14.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slip; missing space; OCR slips; words run together; missing space; punctuation slip; stray mark; words run together; OCR slip): Cum enimessemus in carne, passionespeccatorum quæ per Legem sunt. Uude per Legem → Cum enim essemus in carne, passiones peccatorum quæ per Legem sunt. Unde per Legem; Quid est, quia cramus in carne → Quid est, quia eramus in carne; aut cis loquebatur → aut eis loquebatur; etquibus loqucbatnr → et quibus loquebatur; de nobis considcremus → de nobis confideremus; salutare Dei.,Quid est → salutare Dei. Quid est; omnis homo?Et quid → omnis homo? Et quid; carnis nomine hom6 significatus → carnis nomine homo significatus; prævaricator est factus. Deum → prævaricator est factus, Deum; nisi morti?Si damnandus erat peccator quain spem → nisi morti? Si damnandus erat peccator, quam spem.
Topics: Christology
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 153.8 (PL 38:491; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/153-1/#p-153-8). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-153-8) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
153.9PL 38:491
Ergo, o homo, vicit te concupiscentia tua; vicit, quia in malo loco te invenit: invenit te in carne, ideo te vicit. Migra inde: quid expavescis? Non tibi dixi ut moriaris. Noli expavescere, quia dixi, Migra de carne. Non tibi dixi ut moriaris, imo audeo dicere, dixi ut moriaris. Si mortui estis cum Christo, quæ sursum sunt quærite. In carne vivens, noli esse in carne. Omnis caro fenum, Verbum autem Domini manet in œternum. Dominus fiat refugium tuum. Instat concupiscentia, urget te, magnas vires accepit adversum te. prohibitione Legis grandior facta est, majorem hostem pateris: sit Dominus refugium tuum, turris fortitudinis a facie inimici. Noli ergo esse in carne, in spiritu esto. Quid est in spiritu esto? In Deo spem pone. Nam si posueris spem in ipso spiritu quo homo es, iterum spiritus tuus in carnem relabitur, quia non dedisti eum illi a quo suspendatur. Non se continet, si non continetur. Noli remanere in te, transcende et te: in illo te pone qui fecit te. Nam si spem in te hahueris, accepta Lcge prævaricator cris. Invenit te hostis nudum refugio, invadit te: vide ne forte rapiat, velut leo, et non sit qui eruat. Attende verba Apostoli Legem laudantis, se accusantis, reum se sub Lege facientis, et personam forte tuam in se transfigurantis, et dicentis tibi: Peccatum non cognovi, nisi per Legem. Nam concupiscentiam nesciebam, nisi Lex diceret, Non concupisces. Occasione autem accepta, peccatum per mandatum operatum est in me omnem concupiscentiam. Sine lege enim peccatum mortuum est. Quid est, mortuum est? Latet, non apparet omnino, tanquam sepultum ignoratur. Adveniente autem mandato, peccatum revixit. Quid est, revixit? Apparere coepit, sentiri coepit, rebellare adversum me cœpit.
So, O man, your desire conquered you; it conquered because it found you in a bad place: it found you in the flesh; that is why it conquered you. Move from there: why are you alarmed? I did not tell you to die. Do not be alarmed because I said, Move out of the flesh. I did not tell you to die; or rather, I dare to say it, I did tell you to die. “If you have died with Christ, seek the things that are above.” Living in the flesh, do not be in the flesh. “All flesh is grass, but the word of the Lord remains forever.” Let the Lord become your refuge. Desire presses on, urges you, has gained great strength against you; by the prohibition of the Law it has grown greater, you suffer a greater enemy: let the Lord be your refuge, “a tower of strength against the face of the enemy.” So do not be in the flesh; be in the spirit. What is “be in the spirit”? Put your hope in God. For if you put your hope in the very spirit by which you are a man, your spirit slips back again into the flesh, because you have not given it to him on whom it may hang. It does not hold itself up if it is not held up. Do not remain in yourself; pass beyond yourself too: place yourself in him who made you. For if you place your hope in yourself, having received the Law you will be a transgressor. The enemy finds you bare of refuge and attacks you: see that he does not seize you like a lion, with no one to rescue. Attend to the words of the apostle praising the Law, accusing himself, making himself guilty under the Law, and perhaps taking your person upon himself, and saying to you: “I did not know sin except through the Law. For I did not know desire, unless the Law had said, You shall not desire. But sin, taking occasion through the commandment, worked in me every desire. For without the law sin was dead.” What is “was dead”? It lies hidden, it does not appear at all; it is unknown, as if buried. “But when the commandment came, sin revived.” What is “revived”? It began to appear, began to be felt, began to rebel against me.
Col 3:1 (quotation, high confidence) · Col 2:20 (allusion, medium confidence) · Isa 40:6–8 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Pet 1:24–25 (quotation, medium confidence) · Ps 61:3 (60:4 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 50:22 (49:22 Vulg.) (allusion, high confidence) · Rom 7:7–9 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: To leave the flesh is to stop trusting in oneself and to put one’s hope in God, the only refuge against desire made stronger by the Law; without the Law sin lay hidden, with it sin revived.
- Quotations: Col 2:20 with 3:1; Isa 40:6–8 (1 Pet 1:24–25); Ps 61:3 (Vulgate 60:4); Ps 50:22 (Vulgate 49:22); Rom 7:7–9.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's marginal heading left in the text; OCR slips; OCR slip; OCR slip; words run together; OCR slips; OCR slips; words run together; missing spaces; words run together): Confidendum non in se, sed in Deo. Ergo, o homo, vicit tc concupiscentia tua; vieit → Ergo, o homo, vicit te concupiscentia tua; vicit; ut moriaris.Noli expavescere,quia → ut moriaris. Noli expavescere, quia; imo audco dicere → imo audeo dicere; quærite.In carne vivens, noH esse incarnc → quærite. In carne vivens, noli esse in carne; Verbum autemDomini → Verbum autem Domini; magnas vires nccepiL → magnas vires accepit; sil Dominus refugium luum → sit Dominus refugium tuum; relabitur,quia non dcdisti eumilli → relabitur, quia non dedisti eum illi; in illo tc pone → in illo te pone; vide I lie forte → vide ne forte; verba Apostoli Legent laudantis → verba Apostoli Legem laudantis; operatum eat in meomnem → operatum est in me omnem; rebellare adversum me cœpti → rebellare adversum me cœpit.
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 153.9 (PL 38:491; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/153-1/#p-153-9). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-153-9) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
153.10PL 38:491–492
Ego autem mortuus sum. Quid est, mortuus sum? Prævaricator factus sum, Et inventum est mihi mandatum quod erat in vitam. Videte quia Lex laudatur, mandatum quod erat in vitam. Qualis enim vita est, non concupiscere? 0 vita dulcis! Dulcis est quidem voluptas concupiscentiæ: verum est, nec eam homines sequerentur, nisi dulcis esset. Theatrum, spectaculum, meretrix lasciva, turpissima cantilena, dulcia sunt ista concupiscentiæ; dulcia plane, suavia, delectabilia: sed, Narraverunt mihi injusti delectationes, sed non sicut lex tua, Domine. Suavia sunt, dulcia sunt, delectabilia sunt: sed audi meliora, Narraverunt mihi injusti delectationes,sed non sicut lex tua, Domine. Felix anima quæ hujusmodi delectationibus oblectatur, ubi turpitudine nulla inquinatur, et veritatis serenitate purgatur. Quem autem delectat lex Dei, et sic delectat, ut omnes delectationes lasciviæ vincat, non sibi arroget istam delectationem: Dominus dabit suavitatem ( Psal. LXXXIV, 13). Quam dicam? Domine, da mihi illam suavitatem, vel illam? Suavis es, Domine, et in tua suavitate doce me justitias tuas(Psal. ex VIII, 68). In tua suavitate doce me, et doces me. Tunc disco ut faciam, si in tua suavitate doceas me. Cæterum quamdiu blanditur iniquitas et dulcis est iniquitas, amara est veritas. In tua suavitate doce me: ut suavis sit veritas, dulcedine tua contemnatur iniquitas. Multo melior est ct suavior veritas, scd sanis suavis est panis. Quid melius et præclarius pane cœlesti? Sed si non obstupefacit dentes iniquitas. Scriptura enim dicit: Sicut uva acerba dentibus noxia est, et fumus oculis; sic iniquitas utentibus ea. Quid prodest quia panem laudatis, si male vivitis? Quod laudatis non manducatis. Cum ergo audis verbum, cum audis verbum justitiæ et veritatis, et laudas; multo laudabilius est, si facias. Fac ergo quod laudas. An dicturus es: Volo, sed non valeo? Quare non vales? Quia sanitas non est. Unde sanitatem perdidisti, nisi quia peccando Creatorem offendisti? Ergo ut ejus panem, quem laudas, cum suavitate, id est, cum sanitate manduces, dic illi: Ego dixi, Domine, miserere mei; sana animam meam, quoniam peccavi tibi. Ergo, inquit, inventum est mihi mandatum quod erat in vitam, hoc esse in mortem. Erat enim sibi antea ignotus peccator, factus cst manifestus prævaricator. Ecce inventum est illi in mortem, quod crat in vitam.
“But I died.” What is “I died”? I became a transgressor. “And the commandment that was for life was found by me.” See how the Law is praised: “the commandment that was for life.” For what a life it is, not to desire! O sweet life! The pleasure of desire is sweet indeed: that is true; nor would people follow it unless it were sweet. The theater, the show, the wanton harlot, the most shameful song: these sweet things belong to desire; plainly sweet, pleasant, delightful. But “the wicked have told me of delights, but not like your law, O Lord.” They are pleasant, they are sweet, they are delightful: but hear of better things: “The wicked have told me of delights, but not like your law, O Lord.” Happy the soul delighted by delights of this kind, where it is defiled by no foulness and is cleansed by the serenity of truth. But whoever is delighted by the law of God, and so delighted that it conquers all the delights of wantonness, let him not claim this delight for himself: “The Lord will give sweetness.” What shall I say? “Lord, give me that sweetness,” or the other? “You are sweet, O Lord, and in your sweetness teach me your righteous decrees.” In your sweetness teach me, and you do teach me. Then I learn so as to do it, if you teach me in your sweetness. Otherwise, as long as iniquity flatters and iniquity is sweet, truth is bitter. “In your sweetness teach me”: so that truth may be sweet, and iniquity despised through your sweetness. Truth is much better and sweeter; but bread is sweet to the healthy. What is better and more splendid than heavenly bread? But only if iniquity does not set the teeth on edge. For Scripture says: “As an unripe grape is harmful to the teeth, and smoke to the eyes, so is iniquity to those who practice it.” What does it profit that you praise the bread, if you live badly? What you praise you do not eat. So when you hear the word, when you hear the word of righteousness and truth and praise it, it is much more praiseworthy if you do it. So do what you praise. Or will you say: “I want to, but I am not able”? Why are you not able? Because there is no health. How did you lose your health, but by offending the Creator by sinning? So that you may eat his bread, which you praise, with sweetness, that is, with health, say to him: “I said, O Lord, have mercy on me; heal my soul, for I have sinned against you.” “So,” he says, “the commandment which was for life was found by me to be for death.” For before he was a sinner unknown to himself; he became a manifest transgressor. See, what was for life was found by him to be for death.
Rom 7:9–10 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 119:85 (118:85 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 85:12 (84:13 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 119:68 (118:68 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · Prov 10:26 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 41:4 (40:5 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The commandment not to desire was meant for life, a sweeter life than the pleasures of desire; but only God gives the delight that makes his law sweet, so the sick soul must pray to be healed.
- Quotations: Rom 7:9–10; Ps 119:85 (Vulgate 118:85, Old Latin); Ps 85:12 (Vulgate 84:13); Ps 119:68 (Vulgate 118:68); Prov 10:26 (Septuagint form); Ps 41:4 (Vulgate 40:5).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slips; OCR slips; words run together; stray mark; OCR slip; words run together): Ego antem mortuus sum → Ego autem mortuus sum; Et inventum estmihi mandatum → Et inventum est mihi mandatum; Qualis enim ' vita cst → Qualis enim vita est; sed non sicut lex'IIa, Domine Fe iiI anima quæ bujusmodidelectationibusoblectatur → sed non sicut lex tua, Domine. Felix anima quæ hujusmodi delectationibus oblectatur; Quem auteir delectat → Quem autem delectat; non sibi arroget istam deloctationem → non sibi arroget istam delectationem; ut suavis sit reritas. dulcedine tua conten natur iniquitas → ut suavis sit veritas, dulcedine tua contemnatur iniquitas; Sed si non obstup facit dentes → Sed si non obstupefacit dentes; Sicut ura acerba → Sicut uva acerba; Curn crgo audis verbum, cum audis verbum justitiæ etveritatis → Cum ergo audis verbum, cum audis verbum justitiæ et veritatis; sed non valco? Quare nun vales? Quia sinitas non est → sed non valeo? Quare non vales? Quia sanitas non est; ut ejus pincm, quem laudas, run suavitate → ut ejus panem, quem laudas, cum suavitate; Erat onim sibi antea → Erat enim sibi antea.
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 153.10 (PL 38:491–492; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/153-1/#p-153-10). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-153-10) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
153.11PL 38:492
Occasione autem, inquit, accepta peccatum per mandatum fefellit me, et per illud occidit. Sic factum est primo in paradiso: Fefellit, inquit, me occasione accepta per mandatum. Vide serpentem mulieri illi susurrantem. Quæsivit ab ea quid dixerit Deus: respondit illa, Dixit nobis Deus: Ex omni ligno qnod est in paradiso, edetis; de ligno autem scientiœ boni et mali non edetis. Ex eo si ederitis, morte moriemini. Hoc est Dei mandatum. Contra serpens: Non, inquit, morte moriemini. Sciebat enim Deus qnia qua die ederitis, aperientur oculi vestri, et eritis tanquam dii ( Gen. III, 2-5). Occasione ergo accepta peccatum per mandatum fefellit me, et per illud occidit. Gladio quem portabas, te inimicus occidit; armis tuis te vicit, armis tuis te interemit. Recipe mandatum: scito esse arma, non quibus occidat te, sed quibus a te occidatur inimicus. Sed noli præsumere de viribus tuis. Vide parvum David contra Goliath, vide parvum contra ingentem; sed in nomine Domini præsumentem. Tu venis ad me, inquit, cum clypeo et lancea; ego in nomine Domini omnipotentis. Sic, sic; aliter non: omnino aliter non prosternitur inimicus. Qui prasumit de viribus suis, antequam pugnet ipse prosternitur.
“But sin,” he says, “taking occasion through the commandment, deceived me, and by it killed me.” So it happened first in paradise: “It deceived me,” he says, “taking occasion through the commandment.” See the serpent whispering to that woman. He asked her what God had said: she answered, “God said to us: Of every tree that is in paradise you shall eat; but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat. If you eat of it, you will surely die.” This is God’s commandment. Against it the serpent: “You will not,” he says, “surely die. For God knew that on the day you eat, your eyes will be opened, and you will be like gods.” So “sin, taking occasion through the commandment, deceived me, and by it killed me.” With the sword you were carrying the enemy killed you; with your own weapons he conquered you, with your own weapons he slew you. Take back the commandment: know that it is weapons, not for him to kill you with, but for you to kill the enemy with. But do not presume on your own strength. See little David against Goliath; see the little one against the giant, but presuming on the name of the Lord. “You come to me,” he says, “with shield and spear; I in the name of the Lord almighty.” So, so, and not otherwise: in no other way at all is the enemy thrown down. He who presumes on his own strength is thrown down before he fights.
Rom 7:11 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 3:1–5 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Sam 17:45 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: As the serpent used God’s commandment to deceive Eve, sin uses the commandment to kill; the commandment is a weapon against the enemy only for one who, like David against Goliath, trusts in the Lord’s name.
- Quotations: Rom 7:11; Gen 3:1–5; 1 Sam 17:45.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slips): l'ide serpentem → Vide serpentem; Contra serpeas: → Contra serpens:; per mandalum fefellit → per mandatum fefellit; scd qnibus a te occidatur → sed quibus a te occidatur; de viribus t iis → de viribus tuis; contra G liath, vide parvumcontra → contra Goliath, vide parvum contra; Domini omnipotentix → Domini omnipotentis; aliter nun prosternitur → aliter non prosternitur.
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 153.11 (PL 38:492; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/153-1/#p-153-11). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-153-11) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
153.12PL 38:492
Videte tamen, charissimi, videte etiam atque etiam Paulum apostolum contra furorcm Manichæorum esse legis divinæ apertissimum laudatorem, videte quid adjungat: Itaque lex quidem sancta, et mandatum sanctum, et justum, et bonum. Numquid uberius laudari potest? Paulo ante verbo illo quod dixit, Absit, defenderat a crimine, non laudaverat. Aliud est a crimine objecto defendere, aliud debito præconio prædicare. Crimen objectum fuit, Quid ergo dicemus? Lex peccatum est? Defensio, Absit. Uno verbo defenditur veritas; quia magna est Apostoli defendentis auctoritas. Quid diu defendat? Sufficit, Absit. An vultis, inquit, experimentum accipere ejus qui in me loquitur Christus ( II Cor. XIII, 3)? Modo autem: Itaque lex quidem sancta, et mandatum sanctum, et justum, et bonum
See, nevertheless, beloved, see again and again that the apostle Paul, against the madness of the Manichees, is a most open praiser of the divine law; see what he adds: “So the law is holy, and the commandment holy and just and good.” Can it be praised more richly? A little before, with the word “Far from it,” he had defended it from the charge; he had not praised it. It is one thing to defend from a charge brought, another to proclaim with due praise. The charge brought was: “What then shall we say? Is the Law sin?” The defense: “Far from it.” With one word the truth is defended, because the authority of the apostle who defends it is great. Why should he defend it at length? It is enough: “Far from it.” “Do you want proof,” he says, “of Christ who speaks in me?” But now: “So the law is holy, and the commandment holy and just and good.”
Rom 7:12 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 7:7 (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Cor 13:3 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: After defending the Law in a word, Paul goes on to praise it openly as holy, just, and good, against the Manichees.
- Quotations: Rom 7:12; Rom 7:7; 2 Cor 13:3.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's marginal heading left in the text; OCR slip; OCR slips): Apostolus eliam atque etiam Legis apertissimus laudator. Videte tamen → Videte tamen; esse legis divine apertissimum → esse legis divinæ apertissimum; defenderat a criminc, non landaverat → defenderat a crimine, non laudaverat; Lex peccatum cat? → Lex peccatum est?; quia ma na cst Aposioli → quia magna est Apostoli; Suffi, it. Abiit. → Sufficit, Absit.; loquitur CAriMus → loquitur Christus; Modo autum: Itaque lex nuidem → Modo autem: Itaque lex quidem.
Topics: Heresy
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 153.12 (PL 38:492; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/153-1/#p-153-12). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-153-12) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
153.13PL 38:492
Quod ergo bonum est, mihi factum eat mors? Absit. Quia bonum non cst mors. Sed peccatum ut appareat peccatum, per bonum operatum eat mihi mortem. Mors non est lex, sed peccatum est mors. Jamdudum autem dixerat. Sine lege peccatum mortuum est. Ubi vos admonueram, quia mortuum est, dixit, absconditum latet, non apparet. Modo videte quam vere ita dictum sit: Peccatum, inquit, ut appareat peccatum. Non dixit, Ut sit; quia erat et quando non apparebat. Peccatum ut appareat peccatum. Quid est, ut appareat peccatum? Quia concupiscentiam nesciebam, nisi Lex diceret, Non concupisces. Non ait, Concupiscentiam non habebam; sed, concupiscentiam nesciebam. Sic etiam hic non ait, Ut sit peccatum; sed, ut appareat peccatum, per bonum mihi operatum eat mortem. Quam mortem? Ut fiat supra modum peccator aut peccatum per mandatum. Attende, supra modum peccator. Quare supra modum? Quia jam et prævaricatio. Ubi enim lex non est, nee prœvaricatio.
“Did that which is good, then, become death to me? Far from it.” For death is not good. “But sin, so that it might appear sin, worked death for me through what is good.” Death is not the law; but sin is death. He had said a while ago: “Without the law sin was dead.” There I pointed out to you that he said “was dead” meaning that it lies hidden and does not appear. Now see how truly this was said: “Sin,” he says, “so that it might appear sin.” He did not say, “so that it might be,” because it existed even when it did not appear. “Sin, so that it might appear sin.” What is “so that it might appear sin”? Because “I did not know desire, unless the Law had said, You shall not desire.” He does not say, “I did not have desire,” but, “I did not know desire.” So here too he does not say, “so that it might be sin,” but, “so that sin might appear, it worked death for me through what is good.” What death? “So that the sinner, or sin, might become beyond measure through the commandment.” Notice: “beyond measure a sinner.” Why beyond measure? Because now there is transgression as well. “For where there is no law, there is no transgression.”
Rom 7:13 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 7:8 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 7:7 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 4:15 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The good Law did not cause death; it made existing sin appear and, through transgression, made it sin beyond measure.
- Quotations: Rom 7:13; Rom 7:8; Rom 7:7; Rom 4:15.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slip; missing punctuation; OCR slips; stray mark): Quia concupiscentium nesciebam → Quia concupiscentiam nesciebam; Peccatum ut appareut peccatum → Peccatum ut appareat peccatum; concupiscentiam nesciebam Sic etiam hic non ail → concupiscentiam nesciebam. Sic etiam hic non ait; Ut fial supra modum peccator aut peccatuni → Ut fiat supra modum peccator aut peccatum; Attende, supra, modum peccator → Attende, supra modum peccator.
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 153.13 (PL 38:492; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/153-1/#p-153-13). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-153-13) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
153.14PL 38:492
Videte crgo, fratres, videte, gcnus humanum a prima illius primi hominis morte fluxisse. Etenim peccatum a primo homine intravit in hunc mundum, et per peccatum mors, et ita in omnes homines pertransiit. Pertransiit, verbum attendite, quod audistis: considerate, videte quid est, pertransiit. Pertransiit: inde est et parvulus reus; peccatum nondum fecit, sed traxit. Etenim illud peccatum non in fonte mansit, sed pertransiit: non in illum aut illum, sed in omnes homines pertransiit. Genuit peccatores morti obnoxios primus peccator, primus prævaricator. Venit ad sanandos de virgine Salvator. Quia ad te non qua venisti, venit: non enim ille de concupiscentia maris et feminæ, non de illo vinculo concupiscentiæ. Spiritus, inquit, sanctus superveniet in te. Dictum est hoc virgini, dictum est fide ferventi, non concupiscentia carnis æstuanti: Spiritus sanctus superveniet in te, et virtus Altissimi obumbrabit tibi. Quæ tale obumbraculum haberet, quando ardore libidinis æstuaret? Quia ergo non qua venisti ad te venit, liberat te. Ubi te invenit? Venumdatum sub peccato, jacentem in morte primi hominis, trahentem peccatum primi hominis, habentem reatum antequam habere posses arbitrium. Ecce ubi te invenit, quando parvulum invenit. Sed parvuli ætatem excessisti: ecce crevisti, primo peccato multa addidisti; legem accepisti, prævaricator exstitisti. Sed noli esse sollicitus: Ubi abundavit peccatum, superabundavit gratia. Conversi ad Dominum, etc.
See, then, brothers, see that the human race has flowed from that first death of the first man. For “sin entered this world through the first man, and through sin death, and so it passed through to all men.” “It passed through”: attend to the word you have heard; consider, see what “it passed through” means. “It passed through”: hence even the little child is guilty; he has not yet committed sin, but he has contracted it. For that sin did not remain at its source, but passed through: not to this one or that one, but it passed through to all men. The first sinner, the first transgressor, begot sinners liable to death. The Savior came from a virgin to heal them. He came to you, but not by the way you came: for he was not from the desire of man and woman, not from that bond of desire. “The Holy Spirit,” it says, “will come upon you.” This was said to a virgin, said to one fervent in faith, not to one burning with fleshly desire: “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you.” What woman would have such an overshadowing while she burned with the heat of lust? So because he did not come to you by the way you came, he sets you free. Where did he find you? Sold under sin, lying in the death of the first man, drawing the sin of the first man, having guilt before you could have choice. See where he found you, when he found you a little child. But you have passed the age of a little child: see, you have grown up, you have added many sins to the first sin; you have received the law, you have become a transgressor. But do not be anxious: “Where sin abounded, grace abounded the more.” Turning to the Lord, and so on.
Rom 5:12 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 1:35 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 7:14 (allusion, high confidence) · Rom 5:20 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Sin and death passed from Adam to all, so that even infants are guilty; Christ, conceived by the Spirit and not from sexual desire, frees us from inherited and added sin, for where sin abounded grace abounded more.
- Quotations: Rom 5:12 (Augustine’s Latin, “passed through to all men”); Luke 1:35; Rom 7:14; Rom 5:20.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slips; words run together): a pri:na illius primi hominismorte fluxisse. Etcnim → a prima illius primi hominis morte fluxisse. Etenim; peccaturo nondum fecit → peccatum nondum fecit; obumbrabit libi → obumbrabit tibi; ardore libidinis æestuaret → ardore libidinis æstuaret; non qua venisti ad le venit → non qua venisti ad te venit; trahentem peccalum primi hominis → trahentem peccatum primi hominis; Conversi ad Dominum, ctc. → Conversi ad Dominum, etc..
Topics: Baptism, Christology
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 153.14 (PL 38:492; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/153-1/#p-153-14). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-153-14) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).