Against the Valentinians 20–39

Latin text: CSEL 47 (Latin text: Emil Kroymann (CSEL 47, 1906), digitized by Open Greek and Latin, University of Leipzig (csel-dev), CC BY-SA 4.0).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0). Compare: Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 3 (1885).

Show

Chapter 20

20CSEL 47:198–199

Igitur Demiurgus, extra Pleromatis limites constitutus, in ignominiosa aeterni exilii uastitate nouam prouinciam condidit, hunc mundum, repurgata confusione et distincta diuersitate duplicis substantiae illius detrusae animalium et materialium. ex incorporalibus corpora aedificat: grauia leuia, sublimantia atque uergentia, caelestia atque terrena. tum ipsam caelorum septemplicem scaenam solio desuper suo finit. unde et Sabbatum dictus est ab hebdomade sedis suae, ut Ogdoada mater Achamoth ab argumento ogdoadis primigenitalis. caelos autem νοερούς deputant et interdum angelos eos faciunt, sicut et ipsum Demiurgum, sicut et Paradisum Archangelum quartum, quoniam et hunc supra caelum tertium pangunt, ex cuius uirtute sumpserit (aliquid) Adam, deuersatus illic inter nubeculas et arbusculas. satis meminerat Ptolomaeus puerilium dicibulorum, in mari poma nasci et in arbore pisces; sic et in caelestibus nuceta praesumpsit. operatur Demiurgus ignorans et ideo fortasse non scit arbores in sola terra institui oportere. plane mater sciebat. quidni suggerebat, quae et effectum suum ministrabat? sed tantum fastigium filio extruens per ea opera, quae illum et patrem et deum et regem ante Valentinianorum quoque ingenia testantur, cur se ipsam noluit ei notam, postea quaeram.

So the Demiurge, placed outside the bounds of the Pleroma, in the ignominious wasteland of eternal exile, founded a new province, this world, after clearing up the confusion and distinguishing the diversity of that twofold substance thrust down, of psychic and material things. From incorporeal things he builds bodies: heavy and light, rising and sinking, heavenly and earthly. Then he completes the sevenfold stage of the heavens itself with his own throne above. Hence he was also called Sabbath, from the seven of his seat, just as his mother Achamoth is called Ogdoad, after the model of the first-begotten Ogdoad. The heavens they reckon to be intellectual beings, and sometimes they make them angels, as they do the Demiurge himself; and Paradise too a fourth archangel, since they fix this also above the third heaven; from its power Adam took (something), when he lodged there among little clouds and little trees. Ptolemy remembered well enough the children's sayings, that apples grow in the sea and fish in trees; so he presumed nut groves in the heavens. The Demiurge works in ignorance, and so perhaps does not know that trees ought to be planted only on earth. His mother surely knew. Why did she not suggest it, she who was even supplying his work? But why, while building so lofty a height for her son through those works which bear witness to him as Father and God and King even before the Valentinians' clever notions, she did not wish to make herself known to him, I shall ask later.

2 Cor 12:2–4 (allusion, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The Demiurge builds this world and seven heavens, called Sabbath after his seventh seat; the Valentinians even put Paradise with its trees above the third heaven.

  • The allusion is 2 Cor 12:2–4. The Greek word garbled in the digital text is νοερούς (“intellectual”), as in Irenaeus, Against Heresies 1.5.2, which Tertullian follows.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (Greek word garbled by OCR (the digital text marks it sic); Irenaeus 1.5.2 has νοερούς): voapοό; → νοερούς.

Extrabiblical texts: Irenaeus, Irenaeus, Haer. 1.5.2 (Irenaeus, Against Heresies; allusion)

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Tertullian, Val. 20 (CSEL 47:198–199; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/tertullian-valentinianos/20/#p-20).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-tertullian-valentinianos-20) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin text of CSEL 47; made independently of existing English translations.

Chapter 21

21CSEL 47:199–200

interim tenendum Sophiam cognominari et Terram et Matrem et, quod magis rideas, etiam Spiritum Sanctum, quasi marem [terram]. ita omnem illi (masculi) honorem contulerunt feminae, puto et barbam, ne dixerim cetera. alioquin Demiurgus adeo rerum non erat compos, de animalis scilicet census inualitudine spiritalia accedere, ut se solum ratus contionaretur: ego deus, et absque me non est. certe tamen non fuisse se retro sciebat. ergo et factum intellegebat et factitatorem facti esse quemcumque. quomodo ergo solus sibi uidebatur, etsi non certus, saltim suspectus de aliquo factitatore?

Meanwhile we must hold that Sophia is also surnamed Earth and Mother and, what will make you laugh more, even Holy Spirit, as if she were male. So they have conferred all (male) honour on a female; a beard too, I suppose, not to mention the rest. Otherwise the Demiurge was so little master of things (spiritual things, of course, being beyond the reach of the weakness of the psychic rank) that, thinking himself alone, he declared: “I am God, and besides me there is none.” Yet he certainly knew that he had not existed before. So he understood both that he had been made and that there was some maker of what was made. How then did he seem to himself to be alone, if not certain of some maker, at least suspecting one?

Isa 45:5 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 46:9 (allusion, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The Valentinians give Sophia (Achamoth) many names, even Holy Spirit; and their Demiurge, knowing he had been made, absurdly claims to be the only God.

  • Sophia here is the lower Sophia, Achamoth. The quotation is Isa 45:5 (46:9). “[terram]” is bracketed by the editor as spurious and is left out.

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Tertullian, Val. 21 (CSEL 47:199–200; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/tertullian-valentinianos/20/#p-21).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-tertullian-valentinianos-21) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin text of CSEL 47; made independently of existing English translations.

Chapter 22

22CSEL 47:200

Tolerabilior infamia est apud illos in diabolum, uel quia origo sordidior capit. ex nequitia enim maeroris illius deputatur, ex qua angelorum et daemonum et omnium spiritalium malitiarum genituras notant. et tamen diabolum quoque opus Demiurgi adfirmant et Munditenentem appellant et superiorum magis gnarum defendunt, ut spiritalem natura, quam Demiurgum, ut animalem. meretur ab illis praelationem cui omnes haereses procurantur.

Among them the infamy heaped on the devil is more tolerable, perhaps because his origin allows something filthier. For he is ascribed to the wickedness of that grief, from which they record the births of angels and demons and all the spiritual forces of evil. And yet they affirm that the devil too is the work of the Demiurge, and call him the World-ruler, and maintain that he knows more of the higher things, as being spiritual by nature, than the Demiurge, who is psychic. He deserves precedence among them, he for whom all heresies are procured.

Eph 6:12 (allusion, high confidence) · John 12:31 (echo, low confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The Valentinians derive the devil and evil spirits from Achamoth's grief, call him the World-ruler, and rank him above the Creator in knowledge.

  • The allusions are Eph 6:12 (“world-rulers”, “spiritual forces of evil”) and John 12:31.

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Tertullian, Val. 22 (CSEL 47:200; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/tertullian-valentinianos/20/#p-22).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-tertullian-valentinianos-22) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin text of CSEL 47; made independently of existing English translations.

Chapter 23

23CSEL 47:200

Singularium autem potestatum arces his finibus collocant: in summis summitatibus praesidet tricenarius Pleroma, Horo signante lineam extremam. inferius illum metatur medietatem Achamoth, filium calcans. subest enim Demiurgus in Hebdomade sua. magis diabolus in isto nobiscum conuenit mundo, coelementato et concorporificato, ut supra editum est. ex Sophiae utilissimis casibus, qua nec aerem haberet, reciporcandi spiritus spatium, teneram omnium corporum uestem, colorum omnium indicem, organum temporum, si non et istum Sophiae maestitia colasset, sicut animalia metus, sicut conuersio eius ipsum Demiurgum. his omnibus elementis atque corporibus ignis inflabellatus est. cuius originalem Sophiae passionem quia nondum ediderunt, ego interim argumentabor motiunculis eius excussum. credas enim illam in tantis uexationibus etiam febricitasse.

They place the citadels of the individual powers within these bounds. In the highest heights presides the thirtyfold Pleroma, with Horos marking its outermost line. Below it Achamoth measures out the middle region, treading on her son; for beneath her is the Demiurge in his Hebdomad. The devil rather shares this world with us, compounded of the same elements and bodies, as was stated above, out of Sophia's most useful misfortunes; so that it would not even have air, the space for drawing breath in and out, the tender garment of all bodies, the revealer of all colours, the instrument of the seasons, had not Sophia's sorrow strained this out too, as her fear did the psychic things, and her conversion the Demiurge himself. Into all these elements and bodies fire was fanned. Since they have not yet published from which original passion of Sophia it came, I shall meanwhile argue that it was shaken out of her little tremors. For you might believe that in such great troubles she also ran a fever.

Notes and citation

Summary: Tertullian sets out the Valentinian order of powers (Pleroma, Achamoth, Demiurge, devil) and mocks the idea that air and fire came from Sophia's sorrow and fever.

  • Hebdomad means “group of seven”, here the seven heavens.

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Tertullian, Val. 23 (CSEL 47:200; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/tertullian-valentinianos/20/#p-23).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-tertullian-valentinianos-23) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin text of CSEL 47; made independently of existing English translations.

Chapter 24

24CSEL 47:200–201

Cum talia de deo uel de diis, qualia de homine figmenta? molitus enim mundum Demiurgus ad hominem manus confert et substantiam ei capit non ex ista, inquiunt, arida, quam nos unicam nouimus, terra, — quasi non, etsi arida postmodum, adhuc tamen tunc, aquis * ante segregatis, superstite limo succida fuerit — sed ex inuisibili corpore materiae, illius scilicet philosophicae, de fluxili et fusili eius, quod unde fuerit audeo aestimare, quia nusquam * est. si enim fusile et fluxile liquoris est qualitas, liquor autem omnis de Sophiae fletibus fluxit, sequitur, ut limum ex pituitis et gramis Sophiae constitisse credamus, quae lacrimarum proinde sunt faeces, sicut aquarum quod desidet limus est. figulat ita(que) hominem Demiurgus et de afflatu suo animat. sic erit et choicus et animalis, ad imaginem et similitudinem factus, quadruplex res, ut imago quidem choicus deputetur, — materialis scilicet, etsi non ex materia. Demiurgus — similitudo autem animalis; hoc enim et Demiurgus. habes duos interim. carnalem superficiem postea aiunt choico supertextam, et hanc esse pelliceam tunicam obnoxiam sensui.

When such are their fictions about God, or the gods, what are their fictions about man? For the Demiurge, having built the world, turns his hands to man, and takes his substance not, they say, from this dry earth, which we know as the only one (as though, even if dry afterwards, it was not still moist at that time with the mud that remained, the waters having only just been separated), but from the invisible body of matter, that philosophical one, of course, from its fluid and flowing part; and I dare to guess where that came from, since it is nowhere … For if fluidity and flowing are qualities of liquid, and all liquid flowed from Sophia's weeping, it follows that we must believe the mud consisted of Sophia's phlegm and rheum, which are the dregs of tears, just as mud is what settles out of water. So the Demiurge moulds man and animates him with his breath. So he will be both choic (earthy) and psychic, made after the image and likeness, a fourfold thing: the choic is counted as the image (material, that is, though the Demiurge is not from matter), and the psychic as the likeness, for this is what the Demiurge is too. That makes two so far. Afterwards, they say, a fleshly surface was woven over the choic, and this is the “garment of skin”, subject to sensation.

Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.

Gen 1:26 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 2:7 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 3:21 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The Valentinian Demiurge makes man from fluid matter, which Tertullian says must be Sophia's mucus, and gives him an earthy “image”, a psychic “likeness”, and a covering of flesh.

  • Choic (Greek χοϊκός, “made of earth”) is the Valentinian term for the earthly part of man. The allusions are Gen 1:26, 2:7, and 3:21. The digital text has lacuna marks after “aquis” and “nusquam”.

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Tertullian, Val. 24 (CSEL 47:200–201; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/tertullian-valentinianos/20/#p-24).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-tertullian-valentinianos-24) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin text of CSEL 47; made independently of existing English translations.

Chapter 25

25CSEL 47:201–202

Inerat autem in Achamoth ex substantia Sophiae matris peculium quoddam seminis spiritalis, sicut et ipsa Achamoth in filio Demiurgo sequestrauerat, ne hoc quidem gnaro. accipe industriam clandestinae prouidentiae huius. ad hoc enim et deposuerat et occultauerat, ut, cum Demiurgus animam mox de suo adflatu in Adam communicaret, pariter et semen illud spiritale quasi per canalem animam deriuaretur in choicum, atque ita, feturatum in corpore materiali uelut in utero et adultum illic, idoneum inueniretur suscipiendo quandoque sermoni perfecto. itaque dum Demiurgus traducem animae suae committit in Adam, latuit homo spiritalis flatui eius insertus et pariter corpori inductus, quia non magis semen nouerat matris Demiurgus quam ipsam. hoc semen Ecclesiam dicunt, Ecclesiae supernae speculum et hominis (spiritalis) censum, proinde eum ab Achamoth deputantes, quemadmodum animalem a Demiurgo, choicum substantia aparjc, carne materialem. habes nouum, id est quadruplum Geryonem.

There was in Achamoth, from the substance of her mother Sophia, a certain private fund of spiritual seed, which Achamoth herself had in turn deposited in her son the Demiurge, without his even knowing it. Hear the industry of this clandestine providence. She had deposited and hidden it for this purpose: that when the Demiurge presently imparted a soul to Adam from his own breath, that spiritual seed too might be channelled along with it through the soul, as through a pipe, into the choic; and so, gestated in the material body as in a womb and grown up there, it might be found fit to receive the perfect Word at some future time. So while the Demiurge commits the offshoot of his soul to Adam, the spiritual man lay hidden, inserted into his breath and brought into the body along with it; for the Demiurge knew his mother's seed no more than his mother herself. This seed they call Church, a mirror of the Church above and the rating of the (spiritual) man, so that they derive the spiritual man from Achamoth, as they derive the psychic from the Demiurge, the choic by substance …, the material by flesh. You have a new, a fourfold Geryon.

Gen 2:7 (allusion, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Achamoth secretly passes spiritual seed through the Demiurge's breath into Adam; so the Valentinian man has four parts, spiritual, psychic, earthy, and fleshly.

  • Geryon was the three-bodied giant of Greek myth. The word after “choicum substantia” is garbled Greek in the digital text (“aparjc”) and cannot be restored with certainty; it is rendered with “…”.

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Tertullian, Val. 25 (CSEL 47:201–202; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/tertullian-valentinianos/20/#p-25).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-tertullian-valentinianos-25) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin text of CSEL 47; made independently of existing English translations.

Chapter 26

26CSEL 47:202–203

Sic et exitum singulis diuidunt: materiali quidem, id est carnali, quem et sinistrum uocant, indubitatum interitum: animali uero, quem et dextrum appellant, dubitatum euentum, utpote inter materialem spiritalemque nutanti et iliac debito, qua plurimum adnuerit. ceterum spiritalem emitti in animalis comparationem, ut erudiri cum eo et exerceri in conuersationibus possit. indiguisse enim animalem etiam sensibilium disciplinarum. in hoc et paraturam mundi prospectam, in hoc et Soterem in mundo repraesentatum, [in salutem scilicet animalis] alia adhuc compositione monstruosum. uolunt illum prosicias earum substantiarum induisse, quarum summam saluti esset redacturus, ut spiritalem quidem susceperit ab Achamoth, animalem uero a Demiurgo, quem mox induerit Christum: ceterum corporalem, ex animali substantia sed miro et inenarrabili rationis ingenio constructam, administrationis causa interim tulisse, quo congressui et conspectui et contactui et defunctui ingratis subiaceret; materiale autem nihil in illo fuisse, utpote salutis alienum. quasi alii fuerit necessarius quam egenti salutem. et totum hoc, ut carnis nostrae habitum alienando a Christo a spe etiam salutis expellant.

So they also divide the outcome for each: for the material, that is, the fleshly, which they also call “left”, certain destruction; for the psychic, which they call “right”, an uncertain end, since it wavers between the material and the spiritual and is bound to go wherever it has most inclined. The spiritual, however, is sent out as a companion to the psychic, so that it may be educated with it and exercised in its dealings; for the psychic, they say, needed teachings perceptible to the senses as well. For this the equipment of the world was provided; for this the Soter too was presented in the world, monstrous in yet another composition. They want him to have put on first-cuts of those substances whose sum he was going to bring back to salvation: so that he received the spiritual from Achamoth, and the psychic from the Demiurge, namely the Christ whom he presently put on; but the bodily, built from psychic substance by a marvellous and inexpressible device of reason, he bore meanwhile for the sake of his mission, so that he might be subject, though unwillingly, to being met and seen and touched and to dying; but there was nothing material in him, since that is foreign to salvation. As if he were needed by anyone other than one who needs salvation! And all this so that, by alienating the condition of our flesh from Christ, they may drive it from the hope of salvation too.

Notes and citation

Summary: The Valentinians teach that flesh perishes, the psychic may be saved, and the spiritual is saved by nature; their Saviour had no material body, which denies salvation to our flesh.

  • “First-cuts” renders prosiciae, the portions cut off for a sacrifice. “[in salutem scilicet animalis]” is bracketed by the editor as spurious and is left out.

Topics: Heresy, Christology, Eschatology

Cite (SBL): Tertullian, Val. 26 (CSEL 47:202–203; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/tertullian-valentinianos/20/#p-26).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-tertullian-valentinianos-26) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin text of CSEL 47; made independently of existing English translations.

Chapter 27

27CSEL 47:203–204

Nunc reddo de Christo, in quem tanta licentia Iesum inserunt quidam, quanta spiritale semen animali cum inflatu infulciunt, fartilia nescio quae commenti et hominum et deorum suorum: esse etiam Demiurgo suum Christum, filium naturalem eundemque animalem, prolatum ab ipso, promulgatum prophetis, in praepositionum quaestionibus positum, id est per uirginem, non ex uirgine editum, quia delatus in uirginem transmeatorio potius quam generatorio more processerit, per ipsam, non ex ipsa, non matrem eam sed uiam passus. super hunc itaque Christum deuolasse tunc in baptismatis sacramento Iesum per effigiem columbae. fuisse autem et in Christo etiam ex Achamoth spiritalis seminis condimentum, ne marcesceret scilicet reliqua farsura. nam in figuram principalis tetradis quatuor eum substantiis stipant, spiritali Achamothiana, animali Demiurgina, corporali inenarratiua et illa Sotericiana, id est columbina. et Soter quidem permansit in Christo impassibilis inlaesibilis inadprehensibilis. denique cum ad prehensiones uenitur, discessit ab illo, in cognitione Pilati. proinde nec matris semen admisit iniurias, aeque insubditiuum et ne ipsi quidem Demiurgo compertum. patitur uero animalis et carneus Christus in deliniationem superioris Christi, qui Achamoth formando substantiuali non agnitionali forma, Cruci, id est Horo, fuerat innixus. ita omnia in imagines urgent, plane et ipsi imaginarii Christiani.

Now I give their account of Christ, into whom some insert Jesus with as much licence as they use in cramming the spiritual seed into the psychic along with the breath, stuffing in certain sausage-fillings of their inventions about both men and their gods: that the Demiurge too has his own Christ, a son by nature, and psychic, put forth by him, proclaimed by the prophets, placed within questions of prepositions, that is, born through a virgin, not of a virgin; because, conveyed into the virgin, he came forth in the manner of passing through rather than of being begotten, through her, not from her, finding in her not a mother but a way. Upon this Christ, then, Jesus flew down at the sacrament of baptism in the likeness of a dove. But there was also in Christ a seasoning of spiritual seed from Achamoth, so that the rest of the stuffing should not go stale, of course. For after the figure of the principal Tetrad they pack him with four substances: the spiritual from Achamoth, the psychic from the Demiurge, the bodily and inexpressible, and that of the Soter, that is, the dove's. And the Soter remained in Christ impassible, unhurtable, ungraspable. In fact, when it came to the arrest, he left him, at the hearing before Pilate. Likewise the mother's seed did not admit injuries either, being equally beyond subjection and unknown even to the Demiurge himself. But the psychic and fleshly Christ suffers, as a sketch of the higher Christ, who, in forming Achamoth with a form of substance, not of knowledge, had leaned on the Cross, that is, on Horos. So they press everything into images; plainly they themselves are imaginary Christians.

Matt 3:16 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 27:2 (allusion, medium confidence) · Gal 4:4 (echo, low confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The Valentinian Christ passed through Mary without being born of her, received the Saviour at baptism, and lost him before the passion; so only a psychic Christ suffered.

  • The allusions are the dove of Matt 3:16 and the trial before Pilate (Matt 27:2, 11–14). “Through a virgin, not of a virgin” contrasts with Gal 4:4 (“born of a woman”).

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR: “legum” for “Iesum” (Jesus); the Valentinians “insert Jesus” into the Christ (compare the dove at baptism later in the chapter)): licentia legum → licentia Iesum.

Topics: Heresy, Christology

Cite (SBL): Tertullian, Val. 27 (CSEL 47:203–204; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/tertullian-valentinianos/20/#p-27).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-tertullian-valentinianos-27) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin text of CSEL 47; made independently of existing English translations.

Chapter 28

28CSEL 47:204

Interea Demiurgus omnium adhuc nescius, aut si aliquid et ipse per prophetas contionabatur, ne huius quidem operis sui intellegens — diuidunt enim et prophetiale patrocinium in Achamoth, (in) semen, in Demiurgum — ubi aduentum Soteris accepit, propere et ouanter accurrit cum omnibus suis uiribus — centurio de euangelio — et de omnibus inluminatus ab illo etiam spem suam discit, quod successurus sit in locum matris. ita exinde securus dispensationem mundi huius, uel maxime ecclesiae protegendae nomine, quanto te(mpore) oportuerit * insequitur.

Meanwhile the Demiurge, still ignorant of everything (or, if he too preached something through the prophets, not understanding even this work of his, for they divide the patronage of prophecy too among Achamoth, (the) seed, and the Demiurge), when he learned of the Soter's coming, ran up quickly and exultantly with all his forces, the centurion from the gospel; and, enlightened by him about everything, he learns also his own hope, that he is to succeed to his mother's place. So from then on, free of care, he carries on the administration of this world, chiefly for the sake of protecting the church, for as long a time as is needed …

Matt 8:5–10 (allusion, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: In the Valentinian myth the Demiurge, who did not understand his own prophets, welcomes the Saviour like the centurion of the gospel and learns that he will take his mother's place.

  • The Demiurge is likened to the centurion of Matt 8:5–10 (Luke 7:1–10). The end of the chapter is incomplete in the digital text.

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Tertullian, Val. 28 (CSEL 47:204; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/tertullian-valentinianos/20/#p-28).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-tertullian-valentinianos-28) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin text of CSEL 47; made independently of existing English translations.

Chapter 29

29CSEL 47:204–205

Colligam nunc ex disperso ad concludendum, quae de totius generis humani dispositione disserant. triformem naturam primordio professi et tamen inunitam in Adam, inde iam diuidunt per singulares generum proprietates, nacti occasionem distinctionis huiusmodi ex posteritate ipsius Adae. moralibus quoque differentiis tripertita, Cain et Abel (et) Seth. (bos) fontes quodammodo generis humani in totidem deriuant argumenta naturae atque sententiae: choicum, saluti degeneratum, ad Cain redigunt, animale, mediae spei deliberatum, ad Abel componunt, spiritale, certae saluti praeiudicatum, in Seth recondunt. sic et animas ipsas duplici proprietate discernunt, bonas et malas, secundum choicum statum ex Cain et animalem ex Abel. spiritalem ex Seth de obuenientia superducunt iam non naturam sed indulgentiam, ut quam Achamoth de superioribus in animas bonas depluat, id est animali censui inscriptas. choicum enim genus, id est malas animas, numquam capere salutaria; inmutabilem enim et inreformabilem naturae naturam pronuntiauerunt. id ergo granum seminis spiritalis modicum et paruulum iacitur, sed eruditus huius, (quem) supra diximus, fide augetur atque prouehitur, animaeque hoc ipso ita ceteris praeuerterant, ut Demiurgus tunc ignorans magni eas fecerit. ex earum enim laterculo et in reges et in sacerdotes allegare consueuerat. quae nunc quoque, si plenam atque perfectam notitiam adprehenderint istarum neniarum, naturificatae iam spiritalis condicionis germanitate certam obtinebunt salutem, immo omnimodo debitam.

Now, to conclude, I shall gather from scattered places what they teach about the arrangement of the whole human race. Having professed at the beginning a threefold nature, yet united in Adam, they then divide it by the particular properties of kinds, taking the occasion for such a distinction from Adam's own descendants, who were divided in three by moral differences too: Cain and Abel (and) Seth. These, as the springs, so to speak, of the human race, they draw off into as many types of nature and of destiny: the choic, fallen away from salvation, they refer to Cain; the psychic, left to weigh a middling hope, they assign to Abel; the spiritual, prejudged for certain salvation, they store away in Seth. So too they distinguish souls themselves by a twofold property, good and bad: according to the choic state from Cain and the psychic from Abel. The spiritual element from Seth they add on as something that comes upon them, no longer a nature but a favour, which Achamoth rains down from above into good souls, that is, those enrolled in the psychic rank. For the choic kind, that is, bad souls, never receives the things of salvation; for they have pronounced the nature of a nature unchangeable and unreformable. So that grain of spiritual seed is sown small and tiny; but, trained by the one (whom) we mentioned above, it is increased and advanced by faith; and by this very thing such souls so outstripped the rest that the Demiurge, ignorant as he then was, made much of them. For he used to pick from their roll men both for kings and for priests. And now too these souls, if they have grasped full and perfect knowledge of this nonsense, being naturalized by kinship with the spiritual condition, will obtain certain salvation, indeed salvation owed to them in every way.

Gen 4:1–2 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 4:25 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 13:31–32 (echo, low confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The Valentinians divide mankind into three natures descended from Cain (earthy, lost), Abel (psychic, uncertain), and Seth (spiritual, saved by nature).

  • The allusions are to Gen 4:1–2 and 4:25. The mustard-seed image echoes Matt 13:31–32.

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Tertullian, Val. 29 (CSEL 47:204–205; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/tertullian-valentinianos/20/#p-29).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-tertullian-valentinianos-29) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin text of CSEL 47; made independently of existing English translations.

Chapter 30

30CSEL 47:205–206

Ideoque nec operationes necessarias sibi existimant nec ulla disciplinae munia obseruant, martyrii quoque eludentes necessitatem qua uolunt interpretatione. hanc enim regulam animali semini praestitutam, ut salutem, quam non de priuilegio status possidemus, de suffragio actus elaboremus. nobis enim inscriptura huius seminis, qui imperfectae essentiae sumus, quia norimus Theletum, et utique abortui deputamur, quod mater illorum. sed nobis quidem uae, si excesserimus in aliquo disciplinae iugum, si obtorpuerimus in operibus sanctitatis atque iustitiae, si confitendum alibi nescio ubi et non sub potestatibus istius saeculi apud tribunalia praesidum optauerimus. illi uero de passiuitate uitae et diligentia delictorum generositatem suam uindicent, blandiente suis Achamoth. quoniam et ipsa delinquendo profecit. nam et honorandorum coniugiorum supernorum gratia edicitur apud illos meditandum atque celebrandum semper sacramentum comiti, id est feminae, adhaerendi; alioquin degenerem nec legitimum ueritatis, qui deuersatus in mundo non amauerit feminam nec se ei iunxerit. et quid facient spadones, quos uidemus apud illos?

And so they think neither works necessary for themselves, nor do they observe any duties of discipline, evading even the necessity of martyrdom by whatever interpretation they please. For this rule, they say, was laid down for the psychic seed: that the salvation which we do not possess by the privilege of our state we must work out by the support of our actions. For to us, who are of imperfect essence, belongs enrolment in this seed, since we know Theletus, and we are of course reckoned an abortion, as their mother was. And for us indeed it is woe if we exceed the yoke of discipline in anything, if we grow sluggish in works of holiness and righteousness, if we choose to confess somewhere else, I know not where, and not under the powers of this world before the tribunals of governors. But let them claim their nobility from the looseness of their life and their diligence in sins, with Achamoth flattering her own, since she too advanced by sinning. For indeed, for the sake of honouring the marriages above, it is enjoined among them always to meditate on and celebrate the mystery of cleaving to a companion, that is, a woman; otherwise, they say, whoever has lodged in the world and not loved a woman nor joined himself to her is degenerate and not a legitimate son of the truth. And what will the eunuchs do, whom we see among them?

Matt 10:18–19 (allusion, medium confidence) · Luke 12:11 (allusion, medium confidence) · Phil 2:12 (echo, low confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Believing themselves saved by nature, the Valentinians neglect discipline, explain away martyrdom, and make union with a woman a sacred mystery, while the church must work out its salvation.

  • The phrase “since we know Theletus” is obscure; the sense may be that ordinary Christians, like Sophia's abortive offspring, are counted imperfect. Sacramentum here means a religious mystery. The confession “before the tribunals of governors” alludes to Matt 10:18–19 and Luke 12:11 (compare Tertullian's Scorpiace on the Gnostic evasion of martyrdom).

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (stray hyphen joining two words): ei-iunxerit → ei iunxerit.

Extrabiblical texts: Tertullian, Scorp. (Antidote for the Scorpion's Sting; echo)

Topics: Heresy, Martyrdom, Ethics

Cite (SBL): Tertullian, Val. 30 (CSEL 47:205–206; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/tertullian-valentinianos/20/#p-30).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-tertullian-valentinianos-30) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin text of CSEL 47; made independently of existing English translations.

Chapter 31

31CSEL 47:206–207

Superest de consummatione et dispensatione mercedis. ubi Achamoth totam massam seminis sui presserit, dein colligere in horreum coeperit, [uel] tum ad molas delatum et defarinatum in consparsionis alutacia absconderit, donec totum confrequentetur, tunc consummatio urgebit. igitur imprimis ipsa Achamoth de regione medietatis, de tabulato secundo in summum transferetur. restitutam Pleromati statim excipit compacticius ille Soter, sponsus scilicet, (et) ambo coniugium nouum fient, — hoc erit in scripturis sponsus (et sponsa) — et sponsalis Pleroma. credas enim, ubi de loco in locum transmigratur, leges quoque Iulias interuenire. sicut ex scaena et Demiurgus tunc de Hebdomade caelesti in superiora mutabit, in uacuum iam caenaculum matris, sciens iam, nec uidens illam. nam si ita erat, semper ignorare maluisset.

It remains to speak of the consummation and the distribution of the reward. When Achamoth has pressed out the whole mass of her seed, then has begun to gather it into the barn, then, when it has been taken to the mills and ground to flour, has hidden it in the leather trough of dough until the whole is leavened, then the consummation will press on. First of all, then, Achamoth herself will be transferred from the middle region, from the second storey, to the top. Restored to the Pleroma, she is at once received by that composite Soter, her bridegroom of course, (and) the two will become a new married couple (this will be the bridegroom (and bride) in the Scriptures), and the Pleroma will be the bridal chamber. For you would think that when one moves from place to place, the Julian laws also come into play. Likewise, as on a stage, the Demiurge too will then move from the heavenly Hebdomad to the higher places, into his mother's garret, now empty, knowing her now, though not seeing her. For if that was how it was, he would have preferred to remain ignorant for ever.

Matt 13:30 (allusion, medium confidence) · Matt 13:33 (allusion, high confidence) · John 3:29 (allusion, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: At the end, the Valentinians say, Achamoth will enter the Pleroma as the Saviour's bride and the Demiurge will move up into her place.

  • The images are from Matt 13:30 (the barn) and 13:33 (leaven hidden in flour); the bridegroom and bride from John 3:29 and Rev 21:2. “[uel]” is bracketed by the editor as spurious and is left out. The Julian laws were Augustus' laws on marriage.

Topics: Heresy, Eschatology

Cite (SBL): Tertullian, Val. 31 (CSEL 47:206–207; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/tertullian-valentinianos/20/#p-31).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-tertullian-valentinianos-31) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin text of CSEL 47; made independently of existing English translations.

Chapter 32

32CSEL 47:207–209

Humana uero gens in hoc exitus ibit: choicae et materialis notae totum (in) interitum, quia omnis caro foenum. et anima mortalis apud illos, nisi quae salutem fide inuenerit. iustorum animae, id est nostrae, ad Demiurgum in medietatis receptacula transmittentur, — agimus gratias, contenti erimus cum deo nostro deputari — qua census animalis nihil in Pleromatis palatium admittitur, nisi spiritale examen Valentini. illic itaque primo despoliabuntur homines ipsi, id est interiores, — despoliari autem est deponere animas, quibus induti uidebantur — easque demiurgo suo reddent, [quas ab eo auerterant] ipsi autem spiritus in totum fient intellectuales, neque detentui neque conspectui obnoxii, atque ita inuisibiliter in Pleroma recipientur. furtim, si ita est. quid deinde? angelis distribuentur, satellitibus Soteris. in filios putas? non unus. sed in adparitores? ne istud quidem. sed in imagines? utinam uel hoc! in quid ergo, si non pudet dicere? in sponsas. tunc illi Sabinas raptas inter se de matrimoniis ludent. haec erit spiritalium merces, hoc praemium credendi. fabulae tales utiles, ut Marcus aut Gaius, in hac carne barbatus et in hac anima seuerus maritus pater auus proauus, certe quod sufficit masculus, in nymphone Pleromatis ab angelo — tacendo iam dixi, et forsitan pariat aliquem Onesimum Aeonem. his nuptiis recte deducendis pro face et flammeo tunc, credo, ille ignis arcanus erumpet et, uniuersam substantiam depopulatus. ipse quoque decineratis omnibus in nihilum finietur, et nulla iam fabula. sed ne ego temerarius, qui tantum sacramentum etiam inludendo prodiderim. uerendum mihi est, ne Achamoth. quae se nec filio agnitam uoluit, insaniat, ne Theletus irascatur, ne Fortunata acerbetur. et tamen homo sum Demiurgi: illuc habeo deuertere post excessum, ubi omnino non nubitur, ubi superindui potius quam despoliari (habeo,) ubi, etsi despolior, sexui meo deputor, angelis non angelus, non angela. nemo mihi quicquam faciet, quem et tunc masculum inuenient.

The human race will go to this end: the choic and material stamp wholly (to) destruction, because “all flesh is grass.” And the soul too is mortal among them, except the one that has found salvation by faith. The souls of the righteous, that is, ours, will be sent across to the Demiurge, into the resting-places of the middle region (we give thanks; we shall be content to be counted with our God), since nothing of the psychic rank is admitted into the palace of the Pleroma, only the spiritual swarm of Valentinus. There, then, first the men themselves, that is, the inner men, will be stripped (and to be stripped is to lay aside the souls in which they seemed to be clothed), and they will give these back to their Demiurge, while they themselves will become wholly intellectual spirits, liable neither to being held nor to being seen, and so will be received invisibly into the Pleroma. Stealthily, if that is how it is. What next? They will be distributed to the angels, the Soter's bodyguards. As sons, you think? Not at all. As attendants, then? Not even that. As images? If only even that! As what, then, if one may say it without shame? As brides. Then they will play among themselves at the rape of the Sabines over their marriages. This will be the reward of the spiritual, this the prize for believing. Useful fables indeed, so that Marcus or Gaius, bearded in this flesh and in this soul a stern husband, father, grandfather, great-grandfather, and certainly, which is enough, a male, in the bridal chamber of the Pleroma by an angel (by keeping silent I have already said it), and perhaps may bear some Onesimus Aeon! For conducting these nuptials properly, instead of torch and bridal veil, I suppose, that secret fire will then break out, and, having laid waste the whole of substance, will itself, when everything has been burned to ashes, end in nothing; and there will be no more fable. But let me not be rash, I who have betrayed so great a mystery even in mocking it. I must fear lest Achamoth, who did not want to be known even by her son, go mad; lest Theletus be angry; lest Fortunata be embittered. And yet I am a man of the Demiurge: after my departure I have a place to turn aside to, where there is no marrying at all; where I (am) to be clothed over rather than stripped; where, even if I am stripped, I am reckoned to my own sex, counted with the angels as neither a he-angel nor a she-angel. No one will do anything to me, since even then they will find me a male.

Isa 40:6 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Pet 1:24 (quotation, medium confidence) · Matt 22:30 (allusion, high confidence) · 2 Cor 5:4 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: In the Valentinian end, flesh perishes, psychic souls stay with the Demiurge, and the spiritual become brides of angels in the Pleroma; Tertullian prefers the Creator's promise, where there is no marrying.

  • The quotation is Isa 40:6 (1 Pet 1:24); the allusions are Matt 22:30 (no marrying in the resurrection; like the angels) and 2 Cor 5:4 (“clothed over”). Onesimus means “profitable”. “[quas ab eo auerterant]” (“which they had taken from him”) is bracketed by the editor as spurious and is left out. The rape of the Sabine women was Rome's legendary mass abduction of brides.

Topics: Heresy, Eschatology

Cite (SBL): Tertullian, Val. 32 (CSEL 47:207–209; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/tertullian-valentinianos/20/#p-32).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-tertullian-valentinianos-32) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin text of CSEL 47; made independently of existing English translations.

Chapter 33

33CSEL 47:209

Producam denique uelut epicitharisma post fabulam tantam etiam illa quae, ne ordini obstreperent et lectoris intentionem interiectione dispargerent, hunc malui in locum distulisse, aliter atque aliter commendata ab emendatoribus Ptolomaei. extiterunt enim de schola ipsius discipuli super. magistrum, qui duplex coniugium Bytho suo adfingerent: Cogitationem et Voluntatem. una enim satis non erat Cogitatio, qua nihil producere potuisset. ex duabus facillime prolatum secundum coniugium Monogenem (et) Veritatem, ad imaginem quidem Cogitationis feminam Veritatem, ad imaginem Voluntatis marem Monogenem. uoluntatis enim uis, ut quae effectum praestat cogitationi, uirilitatis obtinet censum.

Finally, as a kind of closing tune after so long a fable, I shall bring forward also those points which, so that they would not disturb the order or scatter the reader's attention by interruption, I preferred to put off to this place: the versions commended in one way and another by Ptolemy's improvers. For there arose from his own school disciples above their master, who fastened on their Bythos a double marriage: Thought and Will. For Thought alone was not enough, since by it he could have produced nothing. From the two the second pair was put forth most easily, Monogenes (and) Truth: Truth female, in the image of Thought; Monogenes male, in the image of Will. For the force of will, as that which gives effect to thought, holds the rank of manhood.

Matt 10:24 (echo, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Some of Ptolemy's followers gave Bythos two consorts, Thought and Will, from whom came Monogenes and Truth.

  • The epicitharisma was the piece played on the lyre after a performance. “Disciples above their master” reverses Matt 10:24.

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Tertullian, Val. 33 (CSEL 47:209; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/tertullian-valentinianos/20/#p-33).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-tertullian-valentinianos-33) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin text of CSEL 47; made independently of existing English translations.

Chapter 34

34CSEL 47:209–210

Pudiciores alii, honorem diuinitatis recordati, ut etiam unius coniugis dedecus ab eo auellerent, maluerunt nullum Bytho sexum deputare, et fortasse hoc deum, non hic deus neutro genere pronuntiant. alii contra magis et masculum et feminam dicunt, ne apud solos Lunenses Hermaphroditum existimet annalium commentator Fenestella.

Others, more modest, remembering the honour due to divinity, and wishing to remove from him even the disgrace of a single consort, preferred to assign no sex to Bythos; and perhaps they speak of him in the neuter gender, as “it-god”, not “he-god”. Others, on the contrary, say more: that he is both male and female, lest the annalist Fenestella think the Hermaphrodite is found only among the people of Luna.

Notes and citation

Summary: Some Valentinians make Bythos sexless, others both male and female.

  • Fenestella was a Roman annalist of the Augustan age; the hermaphrodite of Luna in Etruria is otherwise reported by Livy (39.22) and others.

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Tertullian, Val. 34 (CSEL 47:209–210; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/tertullian-valentinianos/20/#p-34).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-tertullian-valentinianos-34) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin text of CSEL 47; made independently of existing English translations.

Chapter 35

35CSEL 47:210

Sunt, qui nec principatum Bytho defendant, sed postumatum, ogdoadem ante omnia praemittentes, ex tetrade quidem et ipsam sed aliis nominibus deriuatam. primo enim constituunt Proarchen, secundo Anennoeton, tertio Arrheton, quarto Aoraton. ex Proarche itaque processisse primo et quinto loco Archen, ex Anennoeto secundo et sexto loco Acatalepton, ex Arrheto tertio et septimo loco Anonomaston, ex Inuisibili quarto et octauo loco Agenneton. hoc quae ratio disponat. ut singula binis locis et quidem tam intercisis nascantur, malo ignorare quam discere. quid enim recti habent quae tam peruerse proferuntur?

There are some who maintain for Bythos not the first place but a later one, setting an Ogdoad before all things, itself too derived from a Tetrad, but with other names. For they place first Proarche, second Anennoetos, third Arrhetos, fourth Aoratos. From Proarche, then, came forth, in first and fifth place, Arche; from Anennoetos, in second and sixth place, Acataleptos; from Arrhetos, in third and seventh place, Anonomastos; from the Invisible, in fourth and eighth place, Agennetos. What reason arranges it so that each is born in two places, and places so far apart, I would rather not know than learn. For what is right in things put forth so perversely?

Notes and citation

Summary: Other Valentinians put an earlier Ogdoad of abstract Aeons before Bythos.

  • The names mean: Proarche “Fore-beginning”, Anennoetos “Inconceivable”, Arrhetos “Unspeakable”, Aoratos “Invisible”, Arche “Beginning”, Acataleptos “Incomprehensible”, Anonomastos “Unnameable”, Agennetos “Unbegotten”.

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Tertullian, Val. 35 (CSEL 47:210; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/tertullian-valentinianos/20/#p-35).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-tertullian-valentinianos-35) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin text of CSEL 47; made independently of existing English translations.

Chapter 36

36CSEL 47:210

Quanto meliores qui totum hoc taedium de medio amoliti nullum Aeonem uoluerunt alium ex alio per gradus reuera Gemonios structum, sed mappa, quod aiunt, missa semel octoiugem istam ex Propatore et Ennoea eius excusam. ex ipso denique rerum motu nomina gerunt. cum, inquiunt, cogitauit proferre, hoc Pater dictus est cum protulit, quia uero protulit, hoc Veritas appellata est. cum semetipsum uoluit probari, hoc Homo pronuntiatus est. quos autem praecogitauit cum protulit, tunc Ecclesia nuncupata est. sonuit Homo Sermonem, — et hic est primogenitus filius — et Sermoni accessit Vita, et ogdoas prima conclusa est. sed hoc taedium pusillum.

How much better are those who, clearing away all this tedium, wanted no Aeon built up from another by steps (real Gemonian steps), but had this eight-horse team struck out at one go from the Propator and his Ennoia, the napkin dropped once, as they say. In fact they take their names from the very movement of things. “When he thought to bring forth,” they say, “for this he was called Father; when he brought forth, because he brought forth truly, for this it was called Truth; when he wished himself to be proved, for this he was declared Man; and those whom he had thought of beforehand, when he brought them forth, were then named Church. Man uttered the Word (and this is the firstborn Son), and Life was joined to the Word, and the first Ogdoad was complete.” But this tedium is a small one.

Notes and citation

Summary: Some Valentinians derive the first eight Aeons all at once from the Forefather's acts of thinking and bringing forth.

  • The Gemonian steps in Rome were where the bodies of executed criminals were exposed. The dropped napkin (mappa) was the starting signal of chariot races.

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Tertullian, Val. 36 (CSEL 47:210; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/tertullian-valentinianos/20/#p-36).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-tertullian-valentinianos-36) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin text of CSEL 47; made independently of existing English translations.

Chapter 37

37CSEL 47:210–211

Accipe alia ingenia, cicuri iam anima, insignioris apud eos magistri, qui ex pontificali sua auctoritate in hunc modum censuit: est, inquit, (ante omnia Proarche, inexcogitabile et inenarrabile (et) innominabile, quod ego nomino Monoteta. cum hac erat alia uirtus, quam et ipsam appello Henoteta. Monotes et Henotes, id est Solitas et Unitas, cum unum essent, protulerunt, non proferentes, initium omnium intellectuale innascibile inuisibile, quod sermo (Monada) uocauit. huic adest consubstantiua uirtus, quam appellat Unionem. hae igitur uirtutes: Solitas Unitas (Singularitas) Unio ceteras prolationes Aeonum propagarunt. o differentia! mutetur Unio et Unitas et Singularitas [et suum] et Solitas, quaqua designaueris: unum est.

Hear other clever notions, now in a tamer spirit, from a more distinguished master among them, who by his pontifical authority decreed as follows: “There is,” he says, “(before all things) Proarche, unthinkable, unspeakable, (and) unnameable, which I name Monotes. With it was another power, which I also call Henotes. Monotes and Henotes, that is, Solitude and Unity, since they were one, put forth, without putting forth, the intellectual, unbegettable, invisible beginning of all things, which language has called (Monad). With it is a consubstantial power, which he calls Union. These powers, then, Solitude, Unity, (Singularity), and Union, propagated the other emissions of Aeons.” What a difference! Change Union and Unity and Singularity and Solitude however you like: it is one.

Notes and citation

Summary: Another Valentinian teacher begins with Solitude, Unity, Singularity, and Union, which Tertullian notes are all the same thing.

  • The teacher is unnamed also in Irenaeus, Against Heresies 1.11.3, Tertullian's source. “[et suum]” is bracketed by the editor as spurious and is left out.

Extrabiblical texts: Irenaeus, Irenaeus, Haer. 1.11.3 (Irenaeus, Against Heresies; allusion)

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Tertullian, Val. 37 (CSEL 47:210–211; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/tertullian-valentinianos/20/#p-37).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-tertullian-valentinianos-37) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin text of CSEL 47; made independently of existing English translations.

Chapter 38

38CSEL 47:211

Humanior iam Secundus, ut breuior, ogdoadem in duas tetradas diuidens, in dexteram et sinistram, in lumen et tenebras, tantum quod desultricem et defectricem illam uirtutem non uult ab aliquo deducere Aeonum, sed a fructibus t de substantia ueniant

Secundus is now more humane, as being briefer: he divides the Ogdoad into two Tetrads, right and left, light and darkness; only he will not have that deserting and defecting power derived from any of the Aeons, but from the fruits … come from substance.

Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.

Notes and citation

Summary: Secundus divides the first eight Aeons into a right and a left Tetrad, light and darkness, and derives the fallen power from their fruits.

  • The chapter is corrupt and incomplete at its end in the digital text (“a fructibus † de substantia ueniant”).

Topics: Heresy

Cite (SBL): Tertullian, Val. 38 (CSEL 47:211; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/tertullian-valentinianos/20/#p-38).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-tertullian-valentinianos-38) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin text of CSEL 47; made independently of existing English translations.

Chapter 39

39CSEL 47:211–213

De ipso iam domino Iesu quanta diuersitas scinditur! hi ex omnium Aeonum flosculis eum construunt; illi ex solis decem constitisse contendunt, quos Sermo et Vita protulerunt, unde et in ipsum Sermonis et Vitae concurrerint tituli; isti ex duodecim potius, ex Hominis et Ecclesiae fetu, ideoque Filium Hominis auite pronuntiatum; alii (a) Christo et Spiritu Sancto, constabiliendae uniuersitati prouisis, confictum et inde paternae appellationis heredem. sunt, qui Filium Hominis (non) aliunde conceperint dicendum, quam quia ipsum Patrem pro magno nominis sacramento Hominem appellasse (se) praesumpserint. et quid amplius speres de eius dei fide, cui nomine adaequaris? Talia ingenia superfruticant apud illos ex materni seminis redundantia. atque ita inolescentes doctrinae Valentinianorum in siluas iam exoleuerunt Gnosticorum.

About the Lord Jesus himself, what a diversity splits them! Some build him from the little flowers of all the Aeons; others contend that he consisted of the ten alone which Word and Life put forth, and that this is why the titles of Word and Life met in him; others again say rather from the twelve, the offspring of Man and Church, and that this is why he is called Son of Man after his grandfather; others that he was fashioned (by) Christ and the Holy Spirit, who were provided to establish the universe, and so is heir to his father's title. There are some who have conceived that he is to be called Son of Man for (no) other reason than that they presumed that the Father himself, by a great mystery of the name, called (himself) Man. And what more could you hope from faith in that God, with whom you are made equal in name? Such are the clever notions that sprout up among them from the overflow of the mother's seed. And so the doctrines of the Valentinians, growing on and on, have already run wild into the forests of the Gnostics.

Notes and citation

Summary: The Valentinians disagree even about the origin of Jesus, and their doctrines have grown wild into the many sects of the Gnostics.

Topics: Heresy, Christology

Cite (SBL): Tertullian, Val. 39 (CSEL 47:211–213; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/tertullian-valentinianos/20/#p-39).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-tertullian-valentinianos-39) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin text of CSEL 47; made independently of existing English translations.