Sermons 98–101

Latin text: Migne, PL 52 (Latin text: Migne, Patrologia Latina, digitized by Open Greek and Latin (patrologia_latina-dev, University of Leipzig), CC BY-SA 4.0).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0).

Show

Chapter 98

98PL 52:473–477

De parabola grani sinapis. Audistis;hodie,fratres,quemadmodumgranosinapis tota regni coelestis comparata est magnitudo. Et quid est quod potestatem tantam, sic parva,sic minima immo minimorum minima similitudo concludit? Sic enim ait Dominus:Cui simile est regnum Dei? et cui simile æstimabo illud (Luc.XIII)? Cum dicit: Cui est simile, quasi quaerentis indicat et producit affectum. Et ille solus Verbum, scientiæ fons, dicendi flumen,qui omnium corda rigat,sensus aperit,ingenium dilatat,in invenienda similitudine nunc laborat? Sed quid in venerit audiamus. Simile est, inquit, regnum cælorum granosinapis. Quaerens in coelo et in terra, nil invenit nisigranum sinapis,in quo potentiam totam supernae dominationis includat; et illud regnum singularitate potens, aeternitate felix, divinitate fulgens, diffusum toto coelo, tota terra dilatatum, in grani sinapis coarctat et concludit an- gustias? Simile est regnum calorum grano sinapis. Spes ista est credentium tota? Exspectatio ista est fidelium summa? Ista est felicitas virginum longis continentiae laboribus comparata? Ista est gloria martyrum totius effusione sanguinis conquisita? Hoc est quod nec oculus vidit, nec auris audivit, nec in cor hominis ascendit (I Cor.u)? hoc est quod ineffabili sacramento diligentibus Deum promittit Apostotus esse præparatum? Fratres, non facile Dominicis moveamur in dictis; nam si infirmum Dei, fortius est hominibus; etstultum Dei sapientius est hominibus (I Cor.1), hoc minimum Dei tota magnitudine mundi magnificentius invenitur; si modo hoc granum sinapis nos sic nostris seminemus in mentibus,utintelligentiæ magnam nobis in arborem crescat, et sensus altitudine tota levetur ad coelum, ac totos scientiarum diffundatur in ramos atque ita ora nostra ferventia vivido fructus sui sapore succendat,et Ita igne seminissui toto nobis ardeat,et flammetur in pectore.atque nostræ ignorantiæ totum nobis auferat sua degustatione fastidium. Simile est regnum cœlorum grano sinapis,quod acceptum homo misit in hortum suum,et crevit, et factum est in arborem magnam, et volucres cceli requieverunt in ramis eius. Grani sinapis, sicut dicit, instar est regnum Dei, quod de supernis affertur verbo, suscipitur auditu, fide seritur, credulitate radicatur, spe crescit, confessione diffunditur,virtute tenditur, et dilatatur in ramoa, ad quos vocat aves coeli, id est, spirituates sensus, atque in ipsis eas quieta suscipit mancione. Veniat haereticus, veniat, quia redeuntibus Ecclesiæ semper patescit ingressus; veniat,audiat, et pietati Dominicae jam desinat oblatrare. Si cœtestis regni majestas omnis ad grani sinapis similitudinem venit, quid quaeritur quod Deus ad hominem,Duminusa servi descendit in formam?Sic enim venit, hæretice, ut tibi totum per fidem cresceret, cui jam totum defeceratper naturam.Simileest regnum cælorum grano sinapis. Sed sinapis revertamur ad granum:sic tota regni summa|manet, et consistit in regno coelorum.Christus est regnum cœlorum, qui, velut granum sinapis, in hortum virginei corporis missus,orbe toto crucisc in arborem crevit, ac tantum dedit fructus sui saporem,cum teritur passione, ut quidquid est vitale suo saporaret et condiret at"tactu.Nam sicut in integritate granis sinapis virtus habetur occulta, apparet veroTirtus ejus vehementissime si teratur; ita Christus corpore teri voluit, qui suam noluit latere virtutem. Et nos, fratres, teramus istud granum sinapis, ut ejus vim in hac similitudine sentiamus. Christus rex, quia tota ipse est origo regnandi;Christus regnum,quia in ipso est regni sui tota majestas; Christushomo, quia totus homo reparatur in Christo; Christus granum sinapis, nnde magnitudo tota Dei, tota hominis exiguitate minoratur. Et quid plura? Omnia ipse factus est, ut in se repararet omnes; Christus homo accepit granum sinapis.hoc est,regnum Det accepithomo Christus, quod habuit semper Deus Cbristus; misit in hortum suum,hoc est, in Ecclesiam sponsam. Hujus hortis sæpe meminit in Canticis Conticorum, dicendo: Hortus clausus (Cant. iv). Ecclesia hortus estEvan- gelii vomere orbe toto diffusus cultura,clausus stimulis disciplinæ, ab omni pessimo gramine apostoico labore purgatus, fidelium plantariis, liliis virginum, rosis martyrum,confessorum viriditate amoenus, fragrans floribus sempiternis. Hoc itaque granum sinapis in hortum suum misit Christus,id est, promissione regni sui.quod radicatum est in patriarchis natum est in prophetis,crevit in apostolis, in Ecclesia fecit arborem magoam, multiplices dedit in donationibus ramos,quosenumerat Apostolus, dicendo: Alii datus est sermo sapientiæ, alii verbum scientiæ, alii cura sanitatum, alii operatio virtutum, alii prophetia,alii discretio spirituumtaliigenera linguarum (I Cor.XIII).Audistis,fratres,istud granum sinapis in arborem quam prorupit, audistis quas fundavit radices, audistis quales quantosque se jam e diffuderit et severit in ramos, in quibus coeli, non aeris, aves, in pennis sapientiæ et prudentiæ volatu,fidei securitate requiescant. Et tu audi,si vis terrenas bestias non timere,si vis evitare aves rapaces,voraces vultures, hoc est, aves aereas,quæ sunt omnes nequitiæ spirituales; elevare a terra, terrena deserere:sume alas columbæ propheticæ deargentatas( Psal. LXVII), sume pennas divini Solis fulgore radiatas, evola in specie auri, ut in tantis et talibus ramis jam nullis laqueis attentandarequiescas semper, et de volatu tali valida, et de tanta mansione secura. De similitudine sequenti, sequenti verbo, Domino docente, declarabimus.

[On the parable of the mustard seed.] You have heard today, brothers, how the whole greatness of the heavenly kingdom has been compared to a grain of mustard seed. And why does so small, so tiny a likeness, indeed the tiniest of the tiny, contain so great a power? For the Lord speaks thus: “What is the kingdom of God like, and to what shall I compare it?” (Luke 13:18). When he says, “What is it like?”, he displays and puts forward the feeling of one who is searching. Does he, the Word alone, the spring of knowledge, the river of speech, who waters the hearts of all, opens the senses and enlarges the mind, now labour to find a comparison? But let us hear what he found. “The kingdom of heaven,” he says, “is like a grain of mustard seed.” Searching in heaven and on earth, he found nothing but a grain of mustard seed in which to enclose the whole power of the heavenly lordship; and does he narrow and shut that kingdom, mighty in its uniqueness, happy in its eternity, shining with divinity, spread through all heaven and extended over all the earth, within the narrow limits of a grain of mustard seed? “The kingdom of heaven is like a grain of mustard seed.” Is this the whole hope of believers? Is this the highest expectation of the faithful? Is this the happiness of virgins, won by long labours of continence? Is this the glory of martyrs, gained by the shedding of all their blood? Is this what “eye has not seen, nor ear heard, nor has it entered the heart of man” (1 Cor 2:9)? Is this what the Apostle, by an ineffable mystery, promises has been prepared for those who love God? Brothers, let us not be easily troubled by the Lord's sayings; for if “the weakness of God is stronger than men, and the foolishness of God is wiser than men” (1 Cor 1:25), this least thing of God is found more magnificent than the whole greatness of the world; if only we so sow this grain of mustard seed in our minds that it grows for us into a great tree of understanding, and our perception is lifted with all its height to heaven and spreads into all the branches of knowledge; and so it kindles our burning mouths with the lively savour of its fruit, and so blazes in us with all the fire of its seed and flames in our breast, and by its taste takes from us all the distaste of our ignorance. “The kingdom of heaven is like a grain of mustard seed, which a man took and put in his garden, and it grew and became a great tree, and the birds of the sky rested in its branches.” The kingdom of God, as he says, is like a grain of mustard seed: it is brought from above by the word, received by hearing, sown by faith, rooted by belief; it grows by hope, spreads by confession, extends by virtue, and is widened into branches, to which it calls the birds of the sky, that is, spiritual minds, and receives them in them in a quiet dwelling. Let the heretic come, let him come, because entry always lies open to those who return to the church; let him come, let him hear, and let him now stop barking against the Lord's loving condescension. If the whole majesty of the heavenly kingdom comes to the likeness of a grain of mustard seed, why is it questioned that God came down to man and the Lord to the form of a servant? For he came in this way, heretic, so that everything might grow for you through faith, for whom everything had already failed by nature. “The kingdom of heaven is like a grain of mustard seed.” But let us return to the mustard seed; for in this way the whole sum of the kingdom remains and stands in the kingdom of heaven. Christ is the kingdom of heaven, who, like a grain of mustard seed, was put into the garden of a virgin's body, grew on the cross into a tree over the whole world, and, when crushed in his passion, gave such savour of his fruit that he seasoned and flavoured by his touch whatever has life. For as in a whole grain of mustard its strength lies hidden, but its strength appears most vehemently if it is crushed, so Christ, who did not want his power to be hidden, willed to be crushed in his body. And let us too, brothers, crush this grain of mustard, so that we may feel its force in this comparison. Christ is king, because he himself is the whole origin of reigning; Christ is the kingdom, because in him is the whole majesty of his kingdom; Christ is man, because the whole man is restored in Christ; Christ is the grain of mustard seed, in which the whole greatness of God is lessened to the whole smallness of man. And what more? He became all things in order to restore all in himself. Christ the man received the grain of mustard seed: that is, Christ the man received the kingdom of God which Christ as God always had; he put it into his garden, that is, into the church, his bride. He often mentions this garden in the Song of Songs, saying: “A garden enclosed” (Song 4:12). The church is a garden spread over the whole world by the ploughshare of the Gospel, enclosed by the goads of discipline, cleared of every evil weed by apostolic labour, pleasant with the young plants of the faithful, the lilies of virgins, the roses of martyrs, the greenery of confessors, fragrant with everlasting flowers. So Christ put this grain of mustard seed into his garden, that is, by the promise of his kingdom; it took root in the patriarchs, was born in the prophets, grew in the apostles, became a great tree in the church, and put forth manifold branches in gifts, which the Apostle enumerates, saying: “To one is given the word of wisdom, to another the word of knowledge, to another the care of healings, to another the working of mighty works, to another prophecy, to another the discernment of spirits, to another kinds of tongues” (1 Cor 12:8–10). You have heard, brothers, into what a tree this grain of mustard seed has burst forth; you have heard what roots it has laid down; you have heard into what kind of branches, and how great, it has now spread and sown itself, in which the birds of heaven, not of the air, rest in the security of faith, flying on the wings of wisdom and prudence. And you, listen, if you do not want to fear earthly beasts, if you want to avoid birds of prey and greedy vultures, that is, the birds of the air, which are all the spiritual forces of wickedness: rise from the earth, leave earthly things behind; take the silvered wings of the prophetic dove (Ps 68:13), take feathers radiant with the brightness of the divine Sun, fly out in the likeness of gold, so that you may rest always on such great branches, assailed by no snares, strong from such a flight and secure in such a dwelling. Of the next comparison we shall speak in the next sermon, the Lord teaching us.

Luke 13:18–19 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 13:31–32 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 2:9 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 1:25 (quotation, high confidence) · Phil 2:7 (allusion, medium confidence) · Song 4:12 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 12:8–10 (quotation, high confidence) · Eph 6:12 (allusion, medium confidence) · Ps 68:13 (67:14 LXX) (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Chrysologus explains why the kingdom of heaven is compared to a tiny mustard seed: Christ, sown in the Virgin and crushed in his passion, grew on the cross into a great tree, the church, whose branches are the gifts of the Spirit.

  • The sentence “for in this way the whole sum of the kingdom remains and stands in the kingdom of heaven” is obscure in the printed text; translated literally. Migne's reference “I Cor. XIII” for the list of gifts should be 1 Cor 12:8–10. The heretic addressed is probably an Arian.

Topics: Christology, Heresy

Cite (SBL): Peter Chrysologus, Serm. 98 (PL 52:473–477; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/peter-chrysologus-sermones/98). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-peter-chrysologus-sermones-98) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 52 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). No public-domain English exists; sermons in FOTC 17, 109 and 110 (Ganss; Palardy) were checked against them privately after translation, the others re-read against the Latin.

Chapter 99

99PL 52:477–479

De parabola fermenti. Bene cucurrit hodiernae series lectionis, ut evangelica mulier mater nostra acciperet a Domino fermentum, perquod nobishodie hoc templum tantam sanctitatis exigeretur et surgeret in massam. Sic enim coepit Dominus: Cui simile æstimabo regnum Dei? Simile est fermento, quod acceptum mulier abscondit in farinæ mensuris tribus, donec fermentatum est totum (Luc. VIII). Bonus Dominus, amator suo.rum Christus, regni sui similitudines iterat, variat comparationes, quas non de occultosumit,non captat de cœlestibus, sed profert de quotidiano usu,de communiconversatione proponit, ut ad omne genus hominum perveniat,quod est omnibus profuturum, juxta illud prophetae:Audite hæc, omnes gentes, auribus percipite, omnes qui habitatis orbem, quique terrigenæ, et filii hominum, simul dives et pauper (Ps. XLVIII). Si quid de divinitatis occulto, si quid de secreto regali, si quid de penetralibus divitum afferet in medium,hoc nesciret pauper,non caperet mediocritas, notum simplicitas non haberet: nunc vero loquitur nota diviti,usitata pauperi, omnibus vitæ ipsius necessitate * vernacula, quia homo in Dei vocatione quaeritur, non discernitur in ejus vocatione persona. Sed lectam similitudinem replicemus.Cui simile, inquit, æstimabo regnum Dei? Sic dicendo appendit animos auditorum, et attonitos reddit stupore toto, quid regno Dei, quid imperio divino valeat comparari:atque illis mente per multa et magna pervagantibus cæli Dominus in hospitio pauperis, in manu panicoctariae mulieris regni sui invenit et format exemplum, dicendo: Simile est fermento,quod acceptum mulier abscondit in farinae mensuris tribus, donec fermentatum est totum. Ante regnum suum grano sinapis comparabat,nunc illud efficit simile fermento.Ante sinapis granum memorat accepisse virum, mulierem nunc asserit accepisse fermentum. Dicit ante exiguum semen virum sevisse in magnæ arboris incrementum, mulierem modo fermentum. breve ad profectum totius massæ abscondisse manifestat. Vere, sicut dixit apostolus Paulus:Neque vtr sint muliere, neque mulier sine viro in Domino (I Cor. XI). Ad unum regnum diversum sexum varia similitudo perducit, neque virum separat a muliere vocatio Christiana,quos Deus conjungit,natura sociat, et mira similitudine similes reddit habitus, forma componit, et facit Deus, ut si homo unus duo, duo unus, alteripsehomo in copula conjugali; ne sit aut singularitas destituta, aut confusa conjunctio. Sed quare has similitudines regni sui Dominus per virum producit et feminam? Quare majestatem tantam tam vilibus, tam disparibus format exemplis? Fratres, pretiosnm Jatet in hac vilitate mysterium, dicente Apostolo, Mysterium hoc magnum est, ege autem dico in Christo et in Ecclesia(Ephes. v). Comparationibus istis humani generis negotium geritur principale, pervirum etmulieremmundicausa saeculis tractata finitur: Adam primus homo, mulier prima Eva, ab arbore scientiæ boni et mali (Gen. 111), ad evangelici sinapis ardorem deducuntur, ut oculos quos illecebrosa arboraperiendo clauserat, sinapis arbor grani sui collyrio et acritudine ipsa dum claudit aperiret, utora quaevenenosae arboris gustus infecerat, salutaris arbor flammeo gustus sui sapore sanaret; et ista arbor igneo pastu suo conscientiam toto conversationis suæ ardore succenderet, quam frigidam illa toto jam rigore perfecerat. Neque hic jam vel agit, vel confunditur nuditas, ubi hominem totum tegit venia, fidei facit calere vestitus: sed hoc per granum sinapis, quod acceperat vir, confertur feminee. Quid vero per fermentum quod accepit mulier, conferaturhomini, solJicitius perscrutemur. Simile est, inquit, regnum Dei fermento, quod acceptum mulier, abscondit in farinæ mensuris tribus. Res de usu geritur: vir in agro sinapis arborem serit, domi mulier fermentum procurat, et panes praeparat alimoniae, quia virum foris exspectat labor, intus mulierem domesticacuraconstringit. Hinc est quod Sara sterilis et anus ex ista præparatione fermenti, et e ex tribus mensuris, tres subcinericios panes dominicae bospitalitati offert mystico et apponit obsequio (Gen. XVIII), ut sterilitas mundi tota senectute conclusa, in mensuris tribus, hoc est, in aequalitate Patris, et Filii, et Spiritussancti, fermentum fidei collocaret, et Domino suo tres panes poneret confessione Trinitatis; atque pro munere hoc totam Christiani germinis fecundaret ad prolem. Sed ad proposita redeamus. Mulier accepit a Deo fermentum fidei,quae acceperat a diabolo perfidiae fermentum; abscondit in mensuris tribus, hoc est, in tribushominum temporibus, quod estab Adam usque ad Noe, aNoeusque ad Moysen. a Moyse usque ad Christum; utmulierqueecorruperat fermento mortis in Adam totam massam generis humani, fermento resurrectionis totam carnis nostræ massam redintegraret in Christo;ut mulier quae confecerat panem gemitus et sudoris, panem vitae coqueret et salutis; etesset omnium viventium mater vera per Christum, quæ erat in Adam materomnium mortuorum. Ob hoc namque Christus nasci voluit, ut sicut per Evam venit ad omnes mors, ita per Mariam rediret omnibus vita. Quæ Maria hujus fermenti implet typum,similitudinem præfert, consignat figuram, dum de supernis suscipitfermentum Verbi, et humanam carnem in alvo Virginis, immo in alvo Virginis coelestemtotamconspersitin massam. Sed quid allegoricisensus in hac similitudine maneat, jam prodamus. a Mulier quæ accepit, fermentum, Ecclesia est: fermentum quod accepit, coelestis doctrinæ est sacramentum: mensurae tres in quibus perhibetur abscondisse fermentum, Lex, Prophetae,Evangelia, ubi divinus sensus mystico absconditur et celatur in verbo, ut fidelem non lateat, lateat infidelem. Quod autem dixit: Donecfermentatum est totum; illud est quod Apostolus dicit: Ex parte scimus, et ex parteprophetamus: cum autem venerit quod perfectum est, cessabunt quæ ex parte sunt (I Cor. XIII). In conspersione scientianuncdivina est, aspergit sensus, levat corda, iucrementat ingenia, et doctrinarum more ad sapientiæ cælestis dilatat, suscitat, diffundit augmentum, fermentatur totum. Quando? Adveniente Christo.

[On the parable of the leaven.] The course of today's reading has run well, so that the gospel woman, our mother, has received leaven from the Lord, by which this temple of such holiness has today been raised up for us and has risen into a mass. For the Lord began thus: “To what shall I compare the kingdom of God? It is like leaven, which a woman took and hid in three measures of flour, until the whole was leavened” (Luke 13:20–21). The good Lord, Christ the lover of his own, repeats likenesses of his kingdom and varies his comparisons, which he does not take from hidden things or seek from heavenly ones, but brings out of daily use and sets before us from common life, so that what is to profit all may reach every kind of person, according to the prophet's word: “Hear this, all nations; give ear, all who inhabit the world, both the earth-born and the sons of men, rich and poor together” (Ps 49:1–2). If he brought into the open anything from the hidden things of divinity, anything from royal secrets, anything from the inner rooms of the rich, the poor would not know it, ordinary people would not grasp it, the simple would not have it made known to them; but now he speaks of things known to the rich, familiar to the poor, homely to all by the very necessity of life, because in God's call it is the human being who is sought, and in his calling no distinction is made of persons. But let us go over the comparison that was read. “To what,” he says, “shall I compare the kingdom of God?” Speaking thus, he holds the minds of his hearers in suspense and makes them wholly astonished as to what could be compared to the kingdom of God, to the divine empire; and while their minds wander through many great things, the Lord of heaven finds and forms the example of his kingdom in a poor man's lodging, in the hand of a woman baking bread, saying: “It is like leaven, which a woman took and hid in three measures of flour, until the whole was leavened.” Before, he compared his kingdom to a grain of mustard seed; now he makes it like leaven. Before, he mentions that a man received the grain of mustard seed; now he declares that a woman received the leaven. Before, he says that a man sowed a tiny seed for the growth of a great tree; now he shows that a woman hid a little leaven for the rising of the whole mass. Truly, as the apostle Paul said: “In the Lord neither is man without woman, nor woman without man” (1 Cor 11:11). A varied comparison leads the different sexes to one kingdom, and the Christian calling does not separate man from woman, whom God joins, nature unites, makes alike in a wonderful likeness and fits together in condition and form; and God brings it about that in one human being there are two, in two there is one, and the other is the man himself in the bond of marriage, so that there is neither destitute singleness nor confused union. But why does the Lord set out these likenesses of his kingdom through a man and a woman? Why does he form so great a majesty from such lowly and unequal examples? Brothers, a precious mystery lies hidden in this lowliness, as the Apostle says: “This mystery is great; but I speak of Christ and the church” (Eph 5:32). By these comparisons the principal business of the human race is conducted; through man and woman the case of the world, argued through the ages, is concluded. Adam the first man and Eve the first woman are led from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil (Gen 3) to the heat of the gospel mustard, so that the eyes which the enticing tree closed by opening them, the mustard tree might open by closing them with the eye-salve and the very sharpness of its grain; that the mouths which the taste of the poisonous tree had infected, the saving tree might heal with the fiery savour of its taste; and that this tree with its fiery food might kindle with all the heat of a good life the conscience which that tree had made cold with complete numbness. Nakedness here no longer acts or feels shame, where pardon covers the whole man and the clothing of faith makes him warm: but this is conferred on the woman through the grain of mustard seed which the man received. What is conferred on the man through the leaven which the woman received, let us examine more carefully. “The kingdom of God,” he says, “is like leaven, which a woman took and hid in three measures of flour.” The matter is drawn from ordinary life: the man sows the mustard tree in the field; at home the woman sees to the leaven and prepares the loaves for food, because labour awaits the man outside, while domestic care binds the woman within. That is why Sarah, barren and old, from this preparation of leaven and from three measures, offers and sets three hearth-cakes before the Lord whom she hosted, in a mystical service (Gen 18:6), so that the barrenness of the world, shut up in complete old age, might place the leaven of faith in three measures, that is, in the equality of Father and Son and Holy Spirit, and set three loaves before her Lord in confession of the Trinity; and for this gift she was made fruitful for the whole offspring of the Christian stock. But let us return to our subject. The woman received from God the leaven of faith, she who had received from the devil the leaven of faithlessness; she hid it in three measures, that is, in the three periods of mankind, from Adam to Noah, from Noah to Moses, from Moses to Christ; so that the woman who had corrupted the whole mass of the human race with the leaven of death in Adam might restore the whole mass of our flesh with the leaven of resurrection in Christ; so that the woman who had made the bread of groaning and sweat might bake the bread of life and salvation; and that she who in Adam was the mother of all the dead might through Christ be the true mother of all the living. For this is why Christ willed to be born, so that as death came to all through Eve, so life might return to all through Mary. Mary fulfils the type of this leaven, bears its likeness and seals its figure, when she receives from above the leaven of the Word, and in the Virgin's womb, yes, in the Virgin's womb, she mixes human flesh into a wholly heavenly mass. But now let us set out what allegorical sense remains in this likeness. The woman who received the leaven is the church; the leaven she received is the mystery of heavenly teaching; the three measures in which she is said to have hidden the leaven are the Law, the Prophets and the Gospels, where the divine sense is hidden and concealed in a mystical word, so that it may not be hidden from the faithful but may be hidden from the unbelieving. And what he said, “until the whole was leavened,” is what the Apostle says: “We know in part and we prophesy in part; but when the perfect comes, what is in part will cease” (1 Cor 13:9–10). Divine knowledge is now in the mixing; it sprinkles the senses, raises hearts, enlarges minds, and in the manner of teaching it expands, rouses and spreads the growth of heavenly wisdom; the whole is leavened. When? When Christ comes.

Luke 13:20–21 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 49:1–2 (48:2-Ps LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 11:11 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 2:24 (allusion, medium confidence) · Eph 5:32 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 3:6–7 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 18:6 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 3:19–20 (allusion, medium confidence) · 1 Cor 13:9–10 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Chrysologus explains the parable of the leaven as a pair with the mustard seed: man and woman, Adam and Eve, are restored through Christ and Mary; the woman is the church, the leaven heavenly teaching, and the three measures the Law, Prophets and Gospels.

  • The opening phrase “this temple … has today been raised up” may mean that the sermon was preached at the dedication of a church. Migne's reference “Luc. VIII” should be Luke 13:20–21. The three measures are also read as the three ages of mankind and as the Trinity (Sarah's three cakes, Gen 18:6).

Topics: Marriage, Trinity, Scripture and canon

Cite (SBL): Peter Chrysologus, Serm. 99 (PL 52:477–479; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/peter-chrysologus-sermones/99). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-peter-chrysologus-sermones-99) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 52 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). No public-domain English exists; sermons in FOTC 17, 109 and 110 (Ganss; Palardy) were checked against them privately after translation, the others re-read against the Latin.

Chapter 100

100PL 52:479–481

De Syrophænissa, sive Chananea. Hodie Beatus Marcus, cum Syrophoenissae mulieris commendat prudentiam, fidem refert, credulitatis extollit ardorem, sollicitis auditoribus non parvam generat quæstionem, dicendo: Et indesurgenl Dominus abiit in partes Tyri et Sidonis, et ingressus domum, neminem scire voluit, et non potuit latere (Marc. vn). Voluit et non potuit: velle, et non posse, nonestdivinae majestatis, estc infirmitatis humanae; scriptum est enim: Omnia quæcumque voluit Dominus fecit in cœlo et in terra, in mari et in omnibus abyssis (Psalm. CXXXIV). Et Apostolus: Voluntati ejus quis resistit (Rom. IX, 20)? Succumbit necessi- tati quae non liberaet absolutavoluntas. Leprosus dicitad Dominum: Si vis,potesme mundare (Matth. VIII); etevangelista dicit: Voluit,et non potuit. Quid aitbeatus Marcus? Numquid extollenda ita est mulieris fides, ut inclinetur Domini possibilitasetvoluntas? Aut est tanta sagacitas fidei, ut nolente Deo divinu valeat investigare secretum? Tale mihi videtur et illud esse, cum Dominus Hemorrhoissae fidem in suæ virtutis vult prodere,ac probaredocumento, interrogando: Quis me tetigil?Cui discipuli dicunt: Turbæ te comprimunt,et dicis,Quisme tetigit (Marc. v)? Discipulis videbaturquodomnestangerent Dominum solo corpore comprimentes,ettalicarnaliincessu omnes similiter jungerentur: similiter ille, qui aliter sensera t,et aliter inquirebat,pervenisse mulie- rem ad majestatem suam,ad suam penetrassevirtutem, mente, non corpore. non communi tactu,sed fide, istam sciebat. Unde clamat non homo, sed Deus; non caro,sed spiritus: Quis me tetigit? ut eum proderet virtus operis, quem tunc humanitasoccultabat. Sed quid sit voluit. et quid sit non potuit, evidentius inquiramus.Promissionis suae memor Christus,Israelitici populi primum venerat ad salulem,ut quodAbrahae promiserat (Gen. XXII), et semini ejus David (Ps. CXXXI), ej usque posteris, fidele redderet persolutum:sed quia indignos se sua perfidiapraestiterunt, obtinuit, rapuit, traxit 8 fides gentium, quod infidelitas sprevit et perdidit Judaeorum.Audi ipsum dicentem. Non sum missus nisi adoves perditas domus Israel (Matth. xv). Sed oves luporum contagione jam rabidæ,et ipsis bestiis propria feritate sæviores,laniare et violare suum semper voluere pastorem:atque ideo velle suum Christus implere non poterat, non impossibilitate sua, sed nequitia perditorum,et quod aliis detulerat, aliis conferre cogebatur, dicente ipso: Regnum cælorum vim patitur, et qui vimfaciunt, diripiunt illud (Matth.Xi, 6). Vim fecit fides gentium, ut raperethaereditatem Patris, ipsam haereditatem totam diriperet filiorum, sicut evidentius praesenti lectione monstratur. Mulier enim statim ut audivit de eo, cujus habebat filia spiritum immundum, intravit, et procidit ante pedes ejus. Erat autem gentilis Syrophcenissa genere.Et rogabat eum ut dæmonium ejiceret de filia ejus.Qui dixit illi. Sine prius satiari filios; non enim est bonum tollere panem filiorum, et mittere canibus. Non dixit,nonest bonum mittere canibus; sed,Non est bonum tollere filiis, et mittere canibus: quia dare panem canibus,etsi humanitatis non est, humanae tamen estrationis. a Canis dormientibus dominis nocte et custos et pervigil prodit extraneum, turbat furem,occurrit latroni, ut curam relevet et sollicitudinem servulorum. Verumtamen quomodo tulit panem filiis, quibus toties et taliter obtulit, tribuit, ingessit? Sed illi oblatum conculcare ad scelus, non ad vitam sumere sunt conati; et tamen comminutum et conculcatumafiliis,canis tota fide, toto desiderio lambere feslinavit. Hine est quod sic respondit: Utique Domine, nam et catelli sub mensa comedunt de micis puerorum. Merito quæ se canem confessa est,in hominem commutatur,et uste convertuntur in canes qui se filios esse noluerunt; merito adoptatur in filiam, levatur, honoratur ad mensam, quæ se sub mensa laudabili et provida humilitate dejecit; uste toto nunc epulatur micas ex pane, quæ suis meritis se intellexit, et confessa est VIX mereri, Et quid plura? Hinc est quod, propter justitiam suam, Dominus, nec Judeeis dare potuit, nec gentibus denegare.

[On the Syrophoenician, or Canaanite, woman.] Today blessed Mark, while he commends the prudence of the Syrophoenician woman, reports her faith and extols the ardour of her belief, raises no small question for attentive hearers, when he says: “And rising from there the Lord went away to the region of Tyre and Sidon; and entering a house, he wanted no one to know, and he could not be hidden” (Mark 7:24). He wanted, and he could not: to want and not to be able does not belong to divine majesty but to human weakness; for it is written: “Whatever the Lord willed he has done, in heaven and on earth, in the sea and in all the deeps” (Ps 135:6). And the Apostle: “Who resists his will?” (Rom 9:19). A will that is not free and unrestrained succumbs to necessity. The leper says to the Lord: “If you will, you can make me clean” (Matt 8:2); and the evangelist says: “He wanted, and he could not.” What does blessed Mark mean? Is the woman's faith to be so exalted that the Lord's power and will are made to bend? Or is the shrewdness of faith so great that it can search out the divine secret against God's will? This seems to me to be like the time when the Lord wished to bring to light the faith of the woman with the flow of blood as a proof of his power, and to prove it by asking: “Who touched me?” And the disciples say to him: “The crowds are pressing upon you, and you say, Who touched me?” (Mark 5:30–31). It seemed to the disciples that all were touching the Lord, pressing on him with the body alone, and that all were joined to him alike by such bodily jostling; but he, who had perceived otherwise and was asking otherwise, knew that this woman had reached his majesty and penetrated to his power by mind, not by body, not by common touch but by faith. That is why not man but God, not flesh but spirit, cries out: “Who touched me?”, so that the power of the deed might reveal him whom his humanity was then hiding. But let us inquire more clearly what “he wanted” and what “he could not” mean. Christ, mindful of his promise, had come first for the salvation of the people of Israel, so that he might faithfully pay in full what he had promised to Abraham (Gen 22) and to his offspring David (Ps 132) and to his descendants; but because they made themselves unworthy by their faithlessness, the faith of the Gentiles obtained, seized and carried off what the unbelief of the Jews despised and lost. Hear him saying: “I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel” (Matt 15:24). But sheep already rabid from contact with wolves, and fiercer in their savagery than the beasts themselves, always wanted to tear and violate their shepherd; and so Christ could not fulfil his will, not from any inability of his own, but because of the wickedness of the lost; and he was compelled to confer on some what he had brought for others, as he himself says: “The kingdom of heaven suffers violence, and the violent seize it” (Matt 11:12). The faith of the Gentiles did violence, so as to seize the Father's inheritance and carry off the whole inheritance of the sons, as is shown more clearly in the present reading. “For the woman, as soon as she heard of him, whose daughter had an unclean spirit, came in and fell at his feet. The woman was a Gentile, a Syrophoenician by birth. And she begged him to cast the demon out of her daughter. He said to her: Let the children first be fed; for it is not good to take the children's bread and throw it to the dogs.” He did not say, “It is not good to throw it to the dogs,” but, “It is not good to take it from the children and throw it to the dogs”: because giving bread to dogs, even if it is not an act of kindness, is still a matter of human good sense. A dog, at night while its masters sleep, as guard and ever watchful, exposes the stranger, disturbs the thief and confronts the robber, to relieve the care and anxiety of the servants. But how did he take the bread from the children, to whom he had offered, given and pressed it so often and in such ways? But they tried to trample what was offered to the point of crime, not to take it for life; and yet, when it had been broken and trampled by the children, the dog hastened to lick it up with all faith and all desire. That is why she answered thus: “Yes, Lord; for even the little dogs under the table eat the children's crumbs.” Rightly is she who confessed herself a dog changed into a human being, and rightly are those who did not want to be sons turned into dogs; rightly is she adopted as a daughter, raised up and honoured at the table, who cast herself down under the table in praiseworthy and provident humility; justly does she now feast wholly on the crumbs of the bread, who understood and confessed that by her own merits she scarcely deserved it. And what more? That is why, because of his justice, the Lord could neither give to the Jews nor deny to the Gentiles.

Mark 7:24–30 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 135:6 (134:6 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 9:19 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 8:2 (quotation, high confidence) · Mark 5:30–31 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 22:17–18 (allusion, medium confidence) · Ps 132:11 (131:11 LXX) (allusion, medium confidence) · Matt 15:24 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 11:12 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 15:27 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Chrysologus explains Mark's statement that Christ “wanted no one to know and could not be hidden”: Christ came first for Israel, but its unbelief and the Gentiles' faith, shown in the Syrophoenician woman, compelled him to give to the Gentiles what Israel refused.

  • “He wanted … and he could not” follows the wording of Mark 7:24 in Chrysologus's Latin text (voluit … et non potuit). The contrasts between the unbelief of the Jews and the faith of the Gentiles are translated as written. Migne's reference “Matth. XI, 6” should be Matt 11:12.

Cite (SBL): Peter Chrysologus, Serm. 100 (PL 52:479–481; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/peter-chrysologus-sermones/100). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-peter-chrysologus-sermones-100) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 52 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). No public-domain English exists; sermons in FOTC 17, 109 and 110 (Ganss; Palardy) were checked against them privately after translation, the others re-read against the Latin.

Chapter 101

101PL 52:481–483

De morte contemnenda a fidelibus,et quare i Uam permiserit Deus. in illud Lucae: Nolite timere eos qui occidunt corpus, etc. Audistis, fratres,quemadmodum milites suos Christus regia exhortatione compellat, ut deapectu mortis e interfectores corporis non pavescant. Denique eos in amicorum jura transcribit,qui studio triumphi,qui amore libertatis, sanguinem cum gaudio et sine trepidatione Cuderint; sic enim ait: Vobis autem dico amicis meis, Ne terreamini ab his qui occidunt corpus, et post hæc non habent amplius quid faciant. Ostendam autem vobis quem timeatis: timete eum qui postquam occiderit,habet potestatem mittere in gehennam. Vobis autem dico amicis meis, Ne terreamini (Luc. xu): quia libertatem probat virtus,metus indicat servitutem; namliberad gloriam,servus natus est ad timorem; merito ergo ad Dei amicitias sublimatur,qui propter Deum humanas descipit mortes, nescit timores.Si amicos morum facit imitatio,morum similitudo conjungit,convenienter eos amicos vocat Christus,quosimitatione sua mundi jacula,et ipsam mortis formidinem conscipit et praevidet calcaturos. Vobis autem dico. Id est, non omnibus. sed amicis Vobis autem dico. Quos mors absolvit ista, non finit Vobis dtco. Quos corporis resolutio promovet ad me- lius, non transducit ad poenam. Vobis dico. Quibus morte vita inchoatur, non finitur. Vobis dico. Quorum mors pretiosa fit non sui qualitate, sed causa, dum vitæ magis lucrain venit quam vitæ perdat usuram.Sed audiamus quid dicaL amicis suis.Ne terreamini ab his qui occidunt corpia. Audiant qui de bono mortis veterum vetusta volumina detriverunt, nihil tamon inde capere virtutis, aut consolationis aliquid invenire valuerunt.Quia etsi totiseloquentiae viribus ad tolerantiam mortis armarunt animos, siccarunt lacrymas, suspiria sustulerunt,negaveruntgemitus, incluserunt dolores, nihil tamen autdespe certa, aut de perpetua vita, aut de vera suis lectoribus salute conquisierunt. Quis homini,quis homini, quis sapienti dicat? Mori naturae est, necesse est deperire. Nobis vixeruntve- teres,vivimus nos futuris, nemo sibi; quod non potest tolli velle virtutis est: suscipe voluntarius ad quod urgeris invitus; morsantequam veniat non est; cum autem venerit, venisse nescitur. Nec ergo amisisse te doleas quod cum amiseris non dolebis. Sed hæc talia cum dixerint, dicunt totum de sententia, non de vita. Quia unde, etquando, etquomodotibi, et per quem mors venerit, nescierunt: nobis autem auctorvitae prodidit mortis auctorem; Deus namque vitam fecit, diabolus machinatus est in vitam,divino eloquio sic prodente: Deus mortem non fecit (Sap. i), invidia autem diaboli mors introivit in orbem terrarum (Sap. II). Sed dicis, Quare Deus opere diaboliopus suum passus est deperire? 0 homo, si interrogata scire velles, vacares paululum,dares animum,aperires aures, ut negotium principale arbiter ipse tu tam curiosus agnosceres. Sed tu occupatus aliis semper, tibi numquam, quare nescias rerum causas, negotia totaseeculorum,judiciorum profundum,etimpenetrabile secretum,deses etotiosus accusas.Nonne ut apices litterarum, ut elementa cognosceres,addictus magistro, scholis affixus, totus patiens laboris et pœnæ, nec domum noveras, nec parentes? Quam utile tibi est ad quod tibi magister addicitur, ingeritur schola, et tibi pœnis tuis, labore suo doctorsupplicat, ut ista velis scire, ut talia et tanta digneris audire. Probant hoc apostoli, et maxime Paulus, qui vapulando docuit, non cædendo, ut eximius magisterquot sunt homini mores, tot ferret etexciperetpassiones. Etnoseain puncto temporisrerum principia, causas sæculi discamus,quia ubemur; et quomodo nos u- bemur? ettu audis non quomodo debes; et nos ista servitus necessitas talis excusat; te libertas tanta, voluntas talis, indubitanter accusat: quod dicimus, officii nostri est; quod minusdicimus, estfastidii tui. Quaeris, homo, cur non mortem Deus moxcumipso exstinxit auctore, et lethale virus sua providentia tunc non providit, ne ad totius orbis, et praecipue ad suæ imaginis perniciem perveniret? Cœlum quod tu vides,homo,tirmatum aere toto portataquasmultas, nec portatur ab aliquo ipsum, quia solaillud appendit ussio, sola sustinet vis praecepti, divino eloquio sic prodente: Qui extendit cælum sicutpellem,qui tegit in aquis superiora ejus (Psal. CIII). Terra quæ tanto calcatur pondere, atque onere montium, ac molesolidatur,supernatatliquido a fundamento,dicente propheta: Qui fundavit terram super aquas (Psal.CXXXV), ut quod stat, mandati sit, non naturae. Ipse, inquit, dixit, et facta sunt; ipse mandavit, et creata sunt (Psal. CXLVIII), ut quod stat, sit divini operis, non rationis humanæ. Mare quod tanto commotionis sum vertice fertur, et elevatur ad nubes,frenant tenues arenæ, ut videamus potestatem tantam non pulveri cedere,sed præcepto. Omnia quæ in eis sunt, moventur ac vivunt ac vivunt solo jussu facta; iterumsola jussione solvenda confirmat propheta, cum dicit: Initio tu,Domine, terram fundasti, et opera manuum tuarum sunt coeli; ipsi peribunt, tu autem permanebis, It omnes sicut veslimentum veterascent; et velut opertorium mutabis eos, et mutabuntur (Psal. CX). Quomodo? Ut tempori vetustas, non Creatori pereat creatura. Sed tu jam nos, quicumque quaeris, evagatos esse dicis: quia cum tu quaeris quare Deus mortem in destrucLionem sui plasmatis permiserit permanere, nos coelum, terram, mare ex nihilo facta, et solvenda iterum ex nihilo, longo sermone descripsimus, tibi magis ac magis disquirendi materiam conquisivimus. Dicis: Ego quæsivi cur homo pereat, tu etipsa elementa peritura tirmasti,utde generalitate pereundi solatium, non quietem de ratione, Cessis mortalium sensibus provideres; quasi non doloris sit perire caelum, solvi terram, et totam rerum faciem jure mortalitatis aboleri. Dicis, rogo, quid pulchrius coelo? quid splendidius sole? quid luna gratius? quid ornatius stellis? quid salubrius terra? quid utilius mari? aut quae in istis vetustas? quae sicut nata vellacta suntperseverant; quod utique gratius esset ista stare, quam perdere. Homo, forsitan esset jucundius, sed non utilius: nam istis stantibus tu nutasti; istis lucentibus caecatus es, ne videres; coeliclaritas stupefecit sensus tuos,oculos tuos sol splendore coecavit: nam decore deceptus horum, opiticem tu negasti; istos rectores mundi, istos confessus es deos, quos tuae Deus verus subjecerat servituti; necesse est ergo solvi cuncta, novari omnia, ut vel tunc acta creas, cum videris esse reparata. Nec nos æstimes evagatos, quos in argumentum tuae intelligentiae totam percurrisse conspicis creaturam.Homo, quando te auctor tuus fecit ex pulvere,non divisti; nam si te vidisses factum,numquam temoriturumsic detlevisses. Vidisti te perfectum, vidisti te viventem, vidisti te decorum, auclori tuo te similem jam vidisti; unde esses, qualis esses, qui nec nascentem, nec morientem videras,nesciebas?Hinc est quod naturae didisti totum, tibi te, Deo nihil: propterea Deus per naturam redegit te,permisitex nihilo in pulverem revocari; ut quid fueris sic videas,et resurrecturus agas gratias,qui factus, qui creatus ingratissimus exstitisti. Non timeamus ergo, fratres, sicut dixit Dominus, eos qui occidunt corpus, quia istam vitam non perimunt, sed destruunt, dum de temporali faciunt sempiternam, Quid plura, fratres? permisit tunc mori, qui poterat suscitare; quivivificare sufficit, permisit occidi; cui est honor et gloria in sæcula sæculorum, Amen.

[On death, which the faithful should despise, and why God permitted it; on the saying of Luke: “Do not fear those who kill the body,” etc.] You have heard, brothers, how Christ addresses his soldiers with a royal exhortation, that they should not dread those who kill the body when they see death. Indeed, he enrolls among his friends those who, out of zeal for the triumph and love of freedom, shed their blood with joy and without trembling; for he says thus: “I tell you, my friends, do not be afraid of those who kill the body and after that have nothing more that they can do. But I will show you whom to fear: fear him who, after he has killed, has power to cast into Gehenna” (Luke 12:4–5). “I tell you, my friends, do not be afraid”: because courage proves freedom and fear shows servitude; the free man is born for glory, the slave for fear. Rightly, then, is he raised to God's friendship who for God's sake despises human deaths and knows no fear. If imitation of conduct makes friends and likeness of conduct joins them, Christ fittingly calls friends those whom he perceives and foresees will, by imitating him, trample on the darts of the world and the very dread of death. “But I tell you”: that is, not everyone, but my friends. “I tell you”: whom this death releases, not ends. “I tell you”: whom the dissolution of the body promotes to something better, not transfers to punishment. “I tell you”: for whom life begins with death, and does not end. “I tell you”: whose death becomes precious not by its manner but by its cause, since it finds the gains of life rather than losing the use of life. But let us hear what he says to his friends. “Do not be afraid of those who kill the body.” Let those hear who have worn out the old volumes of the ancients on the good of death and yet could take nothing of strength from them or find any consolation. For although with all the forces of eloquence they armed minds to endure death, dried tears, removed sighs, forbade groans and shut in griefs, they gained nothing for their readers concerning sure hope, everlasting life or true salvation. Who would say to a man, to a man, to a wise man: “Dying is natural; one must perish. The ancients lived for us, we live for those to come, no one for himself. To will what cannot be taken away is virtue; take up willingly what you are driven to unwillingly. Death does not exist before it comes; when it has come, it is not known to have come. So do not grieve at losing what you will not grieve for once you have lost it”? But when they have said such things, they say it all out of opinion, not out of life. For they did not know whence, when, how and through whom death came to you; but to us the author of life has disclosed the author of death; for God made life, and the devil plotted against life, as the divine word discloses: “God did not make death” (Wis 1:13), “but through the devil's envy death entered the world” (Wis 2:24). But you say: Why did God allow his own work to perish by the work of the devil? O man, if you wanted to know what you ask, you would give yourself a little leisure, give your mind, open your ears, so that you, so curious a judge, might recognize the principal matter. But you, always busy with other things and never with yourself, idle and lazy, make accusations because you do not know the causes of things, the whole business of the ages, the depth of the judgments and their impenetrable secret. Did you not, to learn the strokes of letters and the alphabet, bound to a teacher and fixed in school, wholly patient of labour and punishment, forget your home and your parents? How useful it is to you that a teacher is bound to you and a school pressed on you, and that the teacher, with his own labour, begs you under penalty to be willing to know these things and to deign to hear such great things. The apostles prove this, and above all Paul, who taught by being beaten, not by beating, so that, as an outstanding teacher, he bore and endured as many sufferings as there are characters among men. And we learn in a moment of time the beginnings of things and the causes of the world, because we are commanded to teach them; and how are we commanded? And you do not listen as you ought; such servitude, such necessity excuses us; such great freedom, such a will accuses you beyond doubt: what we say belongs to our office; what we leave unsaid belongs to your distaste. You ask, O man, why God did not at once extinguish death together with its author, and did not then by his providence forestall the deadly poison, so that it might not bring destruction on the whole world, and especially on his own image? The sky which you see, O man, made firm by the whole air, carries many waters and is itself carried by nothing, because a command alone suspends it, the force of a precept alone sustains it, as the divine word discloses: “Who stretches out the sky like a skin, who covers its upper parts with waters” (Ps 104:2–3). The earth, trodden by so great a weight and made firm by the burden and mass of the mountains, floats on liquid from its foundation, as the prophet says: “Who founded the earth on the waters” (Ps 136:6), so that its standing may be from command, not from nature. “He spoke,” it says, “and they were made; he commanded, and they were created” (Ps 148:5), so that their standing may be from divine work, not human reason. The sea, which is borne along with such a whirl of commotion and raised to the clouds, is bridled by thin sands, so that we may see that so great a power yields not to dust but to a command. All things in them move and live, made by command alone; the prophet confirms that they are to be dissolved again by command alone, when he says: “In the beginning, Lord, you founded the earth, and the heavens are the works of your hands; they will perish, but you will remain; they will all grow old like a garment, and like a covering you will change them, and they will be changed” (Ps 102:25–26). How? So that the creature may perish to time through age, not to the Creator. But now you, whoever you are who ask, say that we have wandered off: because, when you ask why God allowed death to remain for the destruction of his handiwork, we have described at length heaven, earth and sea, made from nothing and to be dissolved again into nothing, and have procured for you more and more matter for inquiry. You say: I asked why man perishes; you have confirmed that the very elements will perish, so as to provide mortal minds with consolation from the universality of perishing, not with rest from reason; as though it were not a grief that heaven perishes, the earth is dissolved, and the whole face of things is abolished by the law of mortality. You say: I ask, what is more beautiful than the sky? What more splendid than the sun? What more pleasing than the moon? What more adorned than the stars? What more wholesome than the earth? What more useful than the sea? Or what old age is there in these, which persevere as they were born and made? Surely it would be more pleasing for these to stand than to perish. O man, perhaps it would be more pleasant, but not more useful: for while they stood, you wavered; while they shone, you were blinded so that you did not see; the brightness of the sky stupefied your senses, the sun blinded your eyes with its splendour; for, deceived by their beauty, you denied their maker; these you confessed to be the rulers of the world, these to be gods, which the true God had made subject to your service. So it is necessary that all things be dissolved and all renewed, so that you may at least then believe them made, when you see them restored. Do not think that we have wandered off, when you see that we have run through the whole creation as an argument for your understanding. O man, when your author made you from dust, you did not see it; for if you had seen yourself made, you would never have lamented in this way that you would die. You saw yourself completed, you saw yourself living, you saw yourself comely, you already saw yourself like your author; you who had seen neither your birth nor your death did not know from what you came or what you were. That is why you gave everything to nature, yourself to yourself, and nothing to God; therefore God brought you back through nature and allowed you to be recalled from what you were into dust, so that you might see in this way what you had been, and, about to rise again, might give thanks, you who, when made and created, proved most ungrateful. So let us not fear, brothers, as the Lord said, those who kill the body, because they do not destroy this life but dismantle it, while they make it everlasting from temporal. What more, brothers? He who could raise allowed death then; he who is able to give life allowed killing; to whom be honour and glory for ages of ages. Amen.

Luke 12:4–5 (quotation, high confidence) · John 15:14–15 (allusion, medium confidence) · 2 Cor 11:23–27 (allusion, medium confidence) · Ps 104:2–3 (103:2-Ps LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 136:6 (135:6 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 148:5 (quotation, high confidence) · Jer 5:22 (allusion, medium confidence) · Ps 102:25–26 (101:26-Ps LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 1:25 (allusion, medium confidence) · Gen 2:7 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 3:19 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Chrysologus urges Christians not to fear those who kill the body, contrasts the philosophers' consolations with the Christian hope, and answers the question why God allowed death: as heaven and earth will be dissolved and renewed, so man returns to dust to learn his origin and rise again in gratitude.

  • The consolations attributed to the philosophers (“Death does not exist before it comes…”) echo commonplaces of Epicurean and Stoic writing; Chrysologus names no author. Wisdom is quoted as “the divine word.” “Recalled from what you were into dust” renders ex nihilo in pulverem revocari, which is obscure; translated by sense.

Extrabiblical texts: Wis 1:13 (Wisdom of Solomon [in RC, EO, ETH canons]; quotation); Wis 2:24 (Wisdom of Solomon [in RC, EO, ETH canons]; quotation)

Topics: Martyrdom, Eschatology

Cite (SBL): Peter Chrysologus, Serm. 101 (PL 52:481–483; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/peter-chrysologus-sermones/101). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-peter-chrysologus-sermones-101) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 52 (digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). No public-domain English exists; sermons in FOTC 17, 109 and 110 (Ganss; Palardy) were checked against them privately after translation, the others re-read against the Latin.