Homilies on Luke 30–34
Latin text: Migne, PL 26 (Latin text: Migne, Patrologia Latina, digitized by Open Greek and Latin (patrologia_latina-dev, University of Leipzig), CC BY-SA 4.0).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0).
Chapter 30
30PL 26:285a–286b
Tam Filio Dei, quam Antichristo regnandi studium est. Sed et Antichristus regnare desiderat, ut occidat quos sibi subjecerit; Christus ad hoc regnat ut salvet. Et unusquisque nostrum, si felix est, regnatur a Christo, sermone, sapientia, justitia, veritate. Si autem amatores voluptatis sumus magis quam amatores Dei, regnamur a peccato, de quo Apostolus loquitur: Non ergo regnet peccatum in vestro mortali corpore (Rom. vi). Duo igitur reges certatim regnare festinant: peccati rex peccatoribus diabolus, justitiae rex justis Christus. Sciensque diabolus ad hoc venisse Christum, ut regnum illius tolleret, et hi qui sub eo erant, inciperent esse sub Christo: ostendit ei omnia regna mundi, et hominum hujus saeculi, quomodo alii regnentur a fornicatione, alii ab avaritia, illi populari rapiantur cura, hi formae capiantur illecebris. Neque vero arbitrandum est, quod regna ei mundi ostendens, Persarum, verbi gratia, regnum Indorumque monstraverit; sed ostendat ei omnia regna mundi, id est, regnum suum quomodo regnaret in mundo, ut cohortans eum facere quod volebat, inciperet etiam Christum habere subjectum. Vis, inquit, in hominibus his regnare? Ostendit innumerabiles hominum multitudines, quae suo tenebantur imperio. Et revera si miseriam et infelicitatem nostram simpliciter volumus confiteri, pene totius mundi rex diabolus est: unde et princeps istius saeculi a Salvatore vocatur. Quod ergo dicit: Vides hos homines qui sub meo regno sunt, ostendit ei in puncto temporis, hoc est, in praesenti temporum cursu, qui ad comparationem aeternitatis puncti instar obtinet. Neque enim necessarium habuit Salvator, ut ei dignitates saeculi istius et negotia monstrarentur: statim ut aciem luminum suorum ad contemplandum vertit, et peccata regnantia, et eos qui regnarentur a vitiis conspexit, et ipsum principem saeculi diabolum supervenientem, atque gaudentem in propriam perniciem, quia tantos sub suo habebat imperio. Dicit ergo ad Dominum diabolus: Ideo venisti, ut adversus me dimices, et tollas de imperio meo quos nunc subjectos habeo? Nolo contendas, nolo nitaris, ne habeas ullam in certando molestiam. Unum est quod precor: procidens adora me, et accipe regnum omne quod teneo. Verum Dominus noster atque Salvator vult quidem regnare, et omnes gentes Subjectas esse ut serviant justitiae, veritati, caeterisque virtutibus; sed vult regnare quasi justitia, ut absque labore regnet, ut nihil faciat indecorum, et non vult absque labore subjectus diabolo coronari, nec sic regnare caeteris, ut ipse regnetur a diabolo. Unde loquitur ad eum Jesus: Scriptum est, Dominum Deum tuum adorabis, et ipsi soli servies (Matth. iv). Hos, inquit, omnes propterea volo mihi esse subjectos, ut Dominum Deum adorent, et ipsi soli serviant. Haec est cupido regni mei. Tu autem a me vis accipere peccata, quae dissoluturus veni, quae etiam a caeteris auferre desidero. Scito atque cognosce me in hoc manere quod dixi, ut adoretur Dominus Deus solus, et hos omnes sub meam faciam potestatem, meoque regno subjiciam: cui gaudeamus nos quoque esse subjectos, et deprecemur Dominum, ut regnans peccatum in corpore nostro mortificet, et regnet nobis solus Christus Jesus, cui est gloria et imperium in saecula saeculorum. Amen.
Both the Son of God and the Antichrist are eager to reign. But the Antichrist desires to reign in order to kill those he has subjected to himself; Christ reigns in order to save. And each of us, if he is blessed, is ruled by Christ: by the Word, by wisdom, by righteousness, by truth. But if we are lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, we are ruled by sin, of which the apostle says: “Let not sin therefore reign in your mortal body” (Rom 6:12). Two kings, then, hasten to reign in rivalry: the devil, king of sin, over sinners; Christ, king of righteousness, over the righteous. And the devil, knowing that Christ had come to take away his kingdom, so that those who were under him might begin to be under Christ, showed him all the kingdoms of the world and of the people of this age: how some are ruled by sexual immorality, others by avarice; some are carried away by the pursuit of popularity, others captured by the allurements of beauty. Nor should it be thought that, in showing him the kingdoms of the world, he showed him, for example, the kingdom of the Persians and that of the Indians; but he showed him all the kingdoms of the world, that is, his own kingdom, how he reigned in the world, so that, urging him to do what he wanted, he might begin to have even Christ subject to him. “Do you want,” he says, “to reign over these people?” He showed him the countless multitudes of people who were held under his rule. And indeed, if we are willing to confess our misery and unhappiness plainly, the devil is king of almost the whole world; hence he is called by the Saviour the prince of this world. When he says, then, “You see these people who are under my rule,” he showed him in a moment of time, that is, in the present course of the ages, which in comparison with eternity is like a moment. For the Saviour had no need for the dignities and affairs of this age to be shown him: as soon as he turned the gaze of his eyes to look, he saw the sins that reign and those who are ruled by vices, and the prince of the world himself, the devil, coming upon him and rejoicing, to his own destruction, that he had so many under his rule. So the devil says to the Lord: Have you come to fight against me and take from my rule those whom I now hold subject? I do not want you to contend, I do not want you to struggle, lest you have any trouble in the contest. There is one thing I ask: fall down and worship me, and receive all the kingdom I hold. But our Lord and Saviour does want to reign, and to have all nations subject to him, so that they may serve righteousness, truth, and the other virtues; but he wants to reign as righteousness, so as to reign without stain and do nothing unseemly; and he does not want to be crowned without labour by becoming subject to the devil, nor to reign over others in such a way that he himself is ruled by the devil. So Jesus says to him: “It is written, You shall worship the Lord your God, and him only shall you serve” (Matt 4:10). All these, he says, I want to be subject to me precisely so that they may worship the Lord God and serve him only. This is the desire of my kingdom. But you want me to receive from you sins, which I have come to destroy, and which I long to take away from others too. Know and understand that I abide by what I said: that the Lord God alone may be worshipped; and I will bring all these under my power and subject them to my kingdom. Let us too rejoice to be subject to him, and let us pray the Lord that he may put to death the sin that reigns in our body, and that Christ Jesus alone may reign in us, to whom be glory and dominion for ever and ever. Amen.
Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.
Luke 4:5 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 4:6 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 4:7 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 4:8 (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Tim 3:4 (allusion, high confidence) · Rom 6:12 (quotation, high confidence) · John 12:31 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 4:9 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 4:10 (quotation, high confidence) · Deut 6:13 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: In the second temptation the devil shows Christ his own kingdom, the people ruled by sin, and offers it for worship; Christ refuses, wishing to reign over all only so that they may worship God alone.
- This homily has no heading in the edition; it treats Luke 4:5–8. “Without stain” renders absque labore (perhaps for absque labe), translated by sense, since the next clause speaks of not wishing to be crowned “without labour.” “The pursuit of popularity” renders populari … cura; Migne notes a variant aura (“popular favour”).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne’s note of a variant reading; OCR; joined words; stray mark): (Rom.· vi) → (Rom. vi); [Al. aura] → ; cohortans cum facere → cohortans eum facere; dignitates sacculi → dignitates saeculi; regnarentur avitiis → regnarentur a vitiis; Verum Domimis noster → Verum Dominus noster; indecorum, el non vult → indecorum, et non vult; Seripium est → Scriptum est.
Topics: Christology
Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Luc. 30 (PL 26:285a–286b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-lucam/30/#p-30). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-lucam-30) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Jerome's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PL 26; digital text of the Open Greek and Latin project); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
Chapter 31
31PL 26:286b–288c
Scrutamini Scripturas, ut et in his quae putantur esse simplicia, reperiatis non minima sacramenta. Scrutemur principium Evangelicae lectionis, quotquot hodie audivimus, et id quod latebat, procedit in medium. Adduxit autem diabolus Jesum in Jerusalem. Hoc incredibile est, ut diabolus duceret Filium Dei, et ille sequeretur. Sequebatur plane quasi athleta ad tentationem, sponte proficiscens. Non formidabat tentantem, neque insidias callidissimi pertimescebat inimici, et quodammodo loquebatur: Duc quo vis, tenta ut placet. Ad tentandum sponte me tribuo, sustineo quae suggesseris. Praebeo me in quibuscumque tentaveris, invenies me in omnibus fortiorem. Adduxit ergo eum in Jerusalem, et posuit super pinnam templi, et dixit: Si Filius Dei es, mitte te deorsum. Adduxit eum in culmen ad summitatem templi, et hortatur ut se inde praecipitet. Quod cum ille fraudulenter proponeret, et sub ostentatione gloriae niteretur, dicebat Salvator: Scriptum est: Non tentabis Dominum Deum tuum. Simulque considera quomodo tentet diabolus. Non aliunde tentare audet, nisi de divinis libris et de psalmis sumens testimonium, ait: Si Filius Dei es, mitte te deorsum; scriptum est enim: Quia angelis suis mandavit de te, et in manibus tollent te, ne forte offendas ad lapidem pedem tuum. Unde tibi, diabole, hoc scire quod ista scripta sunt? Numquid legisti prophetas, vel divina eloquia cognovisti? Licet tu taceas, ego pro te respondebo. Legisti non ut ipse ex lectione sanctorum melior fieres, sed ut simplicitate eos qui amici sunt litterae, interficias. Scis quia si de aliis ei voluminibus loqui volucris, non decipies neque habere poterunt auctoritatem assertiones tuae. Sic legit Scripturas Marcion ut diabolus, sic Basilides, sic Valentinus, ut cum diabolo dicerent Salvatori: Scriptum est, quia Angelis suis mandavit de te, et in manibus tollent te, ne forte offendas ad lapidem pedem tuum (Matth. iv). Si quando testimonium de Scriptura audieris, vide ne statim loquenti acquiescas, sed considera illum cujus sit, ac cujus sententiae, cujus sit voluntatis: ne forte simulet sanctum se esse quomodo non est, et venenis infectus haereseos, sub ovis pelle lupus latitet, ne forte loquatur in eo diabolus de Scripturis. Quomodo autem diabolus per occasionem temporum de Scripturis loquitur: sic econtrario Paulus pro utilitate eorum qui audiunt, non solum de Scripturis, sed etiam de saecularibus libris assumit testimonium, et ait: Cretenses semper mendaces, malae bestiae, ventres pigri. Et rursum de alio: Ipsius enim et genus sumus. Necnon et de Comico: Corrumpunt mores bonos colloquia mala (I Cor. xv). Sed neque diabolus si de Scripturis locutus fuerit, poterit me hac occasione decipere: neque Paulum, si de gentilibus litteris aliquod exemplum sumpserit, quoquo modo me eloquio deterrebit. Ideo enim assumpsit Paulus verba etiam de his quae foris sunt, ut sanctificet ea. Videamus ergo quod de Scripturis diabolus loquatur ad Dominum. Scriptum est enim: Angelis suis mandavit ad te, et in manibus tollent te, ne forte offendas ad lapidem pedem tuum. Vide quomodo et in ipsis testimoniis versipellis est. Vult enim imminuere gloriam Salvatoris: quasi angelorum indigeat auxilio, offensurus pedem, nisi eorum manibus sublevetur. Assumit testimonium, et interpretatur illud de Christo, quod non de Christo, sed de sanctis generaliter scriptum est. Libere quippe et tota confidentia contradico diabolo, super Christi persona hoc non posse intelligi. Neque enim indiget Angelorum auxilio, qui major Angelis, et melius ipsis haereditatem consecutus et nomen, Nulli angelorum umquam dixit Deus: Filius meus es tu, ego hodie genui te (Hebr. i). Ad nullum eorum quasi ad filium locutus: Qui facit angelos suos spiritus, et ministros suos ignem urentem (Psal. ii); sed ad Filium proprie suum, de quo innumerabilia loquitur in prophetis. Non indiget, inquam, angelorum auxilio Filius Dei. Quin potius disce, diabole, quod nisi Jesus adjuverit angelos, offendent pedem suum. Et si quis angelorum visus est offendere, de quibus dudum lectum est, quia angelos judicabimus: ideo offendit, quia non extendit manum suam ad Jesum, ut apprehensus ab eo non offenderet. Quoniam enim in propria virtute confidens, non invocas praesidium Jesu, offendis, et credere in Jesum Christum Filium Dei noluisti. Ut autem scias quod male interpretatus es, et non de Christo, sed de sanctis intelligi quae sequantur, ausculta. A ruina et daemonio meridiano non Jesum Christum liberat Deus, sed sanctos. Lege nonagesimum psalmum, cujus principium: Qui habitat in adjutorio Altissimi, in protectione Dei coeli commorabitur, et invenies haec magis justo viro, quam Dei Filio convenire: Cadent a latere tuo mille, et decem millia a dextris tuis; ad te autem non appropinquabit, verumtamen oculis tuis, videbis, et retributionem aspicies peccatorum, et reliqua, super personam justi interpretans. Sed et sic quoque perverse afferens diabolus testimonia, ut assereret super Salvatore intelligi, silet et transit versiculos qui contra se scripti sunt. Cum enim dixisset: angelis suis mandavit de te, et in manibus tollent te, ne forte offendas ad lapidem pedem tuum, tacuit illud quod sequitur: Super aspidem et basiliscum ambulabis, et conculcabis leonem et draconem. Quare, diabole, siles, nisi quod tu es basiliscus, tu es omnium serpentium regulus, nocentiora habens venena quam caeteri? Qui statim ut videris aliquem, interficis, et aliam fortitudinem contrariam sociam tui assumis, quae aspis appellatur, et viro justo subjecta est, et idcirco omnia taces. Tu es draco, tu es leo, de quibus scribitur: Super aspidem et basiliscum calcabis, et conculcabis leonem et draconem. Sed licet tu taceas, nos qui scripturas rectius legimus, scimus habere nos potestatem conculcandi te, et datam nobis hanc ditionem, non solum in veteri Testamento sicut nunc cantatur in psalmo, sed etiam in novo, Salvatore dicente: Ecce do vobis potestatem calcandi super serpentes et scorpiones, et omnem virtutem inimici, et nihil vobis nocebunt (Luc. x). Sumamus arma tanta potestate firmati, et universa faciamus: ut per conversationem nostram leonem conculcemus et draconem. Porro ut scias quomodo conculcetur leo et conteratur draco, Pauli Epistolam lege, in qua asserit conculcari peccatores Filio Dei. Sicut ergo qui peccator est conculcatur Filio Dei: sic econtrario qui justus est conculcat leonem et draconem, et omnem virtutem inimici conculcat in nomine Jesu Christi, cui est gloria et imperium in saecula saeculorum. Amen.
Search the Scriptures, so that even in passages thought to be simple you may find mysteries of no small importance. Let us search the beginning of the Gospel reading, all of us who heard it today, and what was hidden comes into the open. “And the devil brought Jesus to Jerusalem.” It is incredible that the devil should lead the Son of God and that he should follow. He followed, plainly, as an athlete going to the contest, setting out of his own accord. He did not dread the tempter, nor fear the snares of the most cunning enemy, and in a sense he said: Lead where you will, tempt as you please. I give myself freely to be tempted; I endure what you suggest. I offer myself in whatever you tempt me with; you will find me stronger in everything. “So he brought him to Jerusalem, and set him on the pinnacle of the temple, and said: If you are the Son of God, throw yourself down.” He brought him to the top, to the summit of the temple, and urges him to throw himself down from there. When he proposed this deceitfully and pressed him with the lure of glory, the Saviour said: “It is written: You shall not tempt the Lord your God.” And consider at the same time how the devil tempts. He dares to tempt from no other source: taking a testimony from the divine books, from the psalms, he says: “If you are the Son of God, throw yourself down; for it is written: He has commanded his angels concerning you, and they will bear you up in their hands, lest you strike your foot against a stone.” Where did you get the knowledge, devil, that these things are written? Have you read the prophets, or come to know the divine oracles? Though you are silent, I will answer for you. You read them, not that you yourself might become better by reading holy things, but that by their plain sense you might kill those who are friends of the letter. You know that if you wished to speak from other books, you would deceive no one, and your assertions could have no authority. So Marcion read the Scriptures, like the devil; so Basilides, so Valentinus, so as to say with the devil to the Saviour: “It is written that he has commanded his angels concerning you, and they will bear you up in their hands, lest you strike your foot against a stone” (Matt 4:6). If ever you hear a testimony from Scripture, take care not to assent at once to the speaker, but consider whose it is, what his opinion is, what his intent; lest perhaps he pretend to be holy when he is not, and, infected with the poison of heresy, a wolf lurk under a sheep’s skin, lest perhaps the devil be speaking in him from the Scriptures. And as the devil speaks from the Scriptures as occasion offers, so, on the contrary, Paul, for the benefit of his hearers, takes testimony not only from the Scriptures but also from secular books, and says: “Cretans are always liars, evil beasts, lazy bellies.” And again, from another: “For we are also his offspring.” And from the comic poet: “Evil conversations corrupt good morals” (1 Cor 15:33). But neither will the devil, if he speaks from the Scriptures, be able to deceive me on that account; nor will Paul, if he takes some example from pagan literature, in any way put me off his words. For Paul took words even from those outside precisely in order to sanctify them. Let us see, then, what the devil says to the Lord from the Scriptures. For it is written: “He has commanded his angels concerning you, and they will bear you up in their hands, lest you strike your foot against a stone.” See how crafty he is even in the testimonies themselves. For he wants to diminish the glory of the Saviour, as though he needed the help of angels and would strike his foot unless he were lifted up by their hands. He takes a testimony and interprets it of Christ, though it is written not of Christ but of the saints in general. Freely and with full confidence I contradict the devil: this cannot be understood of the person of Christ. For he has no need of the help of angels who is greater than the angels and has obtained an inheritance and a name better than theirs. “To which of the angels did God ever say: You are my Son, today I have begotten you?” (Heb 1:5). To none of them did he speak as to a son: “Who makes his angels spirits, and his ministers a burning fire”; but he spoke so to his own Son properly, of whom he says countless things in the prophets. The Son of God, I say, has no need of the help of angels. Learn rather, devil, that unless Jesus helps the angels, they will strike their foot. And if any of the angels has been seen to strike his foot (of whom we read a little while ago that “we shall judge angels”), he struck it because he did not stretch out his hand to Jesus, so that, held by him, he might not stumble. For because you trust in your own power and do not call upon the protection of Jesus, you strike your foot, and you have refused to believe in Jesus Christ the Son of God. And so that you may know that you have interpreted it badly, and that what follows is to be understood not of Christ but of the saints, listen. It is not Jesus Christ whom God delivers from ruin and the noonday demon, but the saints. Read the ninetieth psalm, which begins, “He who dwells in the help of the Most High will abide in the protection of the God of heaven,” and you will find that these words fit a righteous man rather than the Son of God: “A thousand will fall at your side, and ten thousand at your right hand, but it will not come near you; yet with your eyes you will look and see the reward of sinners,” and the rest, which is to be interpreted of the person of the righteous man. But even so, perversely adducing testimonies so as to claim that they are to be understood of the Saviour, the devil keeps silent and passes over the verses written against himself. For when he had said, “He has commanded his angels concerning you, and they will bear you up in their hands, lest you strike your foot against a stone,” he kept silent about what follows: “You will walk upon the asp and the basilisk, and you will trample the lion and the dragon.” Why are you silent, devil, unless because you are the basilisk, you are the little king of all serpents, having more harmful poison than the rest? You kill anyone as soon as you see him, and you take as your ally another opposing power, which is called the asp and is subject to the righteous man; and for this reason you keep silent about it all. You are the dragon, you are the lion, of whom it is written: “You will tread upon the asp and the basilisk, and you will trample the lion and the dragon.” But though you keep silent, we who read the Scriptures more rightly know that we have power to trample you, and that this authority has been given us not only in the Old Testament, as is now sung in the psalm, but also in the New, as the Saviour says: “Behold, I give you power to tread upon serpents and scorpions, and over all the power of the enemy, and nothing will harm you” (Luke 10:19). Let us take up arms, strengthened by so great a power, and do everything so that by our conduct we may trample the lion and the dragon. And so that you may know how the lion is trampled and the dragon crushed, read the Epistle of Paul in which he says that sinners are trampled by the Son of God. As, then, one who is a sinner is trampled by the Son of God, so, on the contrary, one who is righteous tramples the lion and the dragon, and tramples all the power of the enemy, in the name of Jesus Christ, to whom be glory and dominion for ever and ever. Amen.
Luke 4:9 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 4:10 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 4:11 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 4:12 (quotation, high confidence) · John 5:39 (quotation, high confidence) · Deut 6:16 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 91:11 (90:11 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 91:12 (90:12 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 4:6 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 7:15 (allusion, high confidence) · Titus 1:12 (quotation, high confidence) · Acts 17:28 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:33 (quotation, high confidence) · Heb 1:4 (allusion, high confidence) · Heb 1:5 (quotation, high confidence) · Heb 1:7 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 6:3 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 91:6 (90:6 Vulg.) (allusion, high confidence) · Ps 91:1 (90:1 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 91:7 (90:7 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 91:8 (90:8 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 91:13 (90:13 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 10:19 (quotation, high confidence) · Heb 10:29 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The devil quotes Ps 91 against Christ, as heretics misuse Scripture, though the psalm speaks of the saints, not of Christ, and its next verse promises that the righteous will trample the devil.
- This homily has no heading in the edition; it treats Luke 4:9–12. Paul’s quotations are from Epimenides (Titus 1:12), Aratus (Acts 17:28), and Menander’s Thais (1 Cor 15:33). The “ninetieth psalm” is Ps 91 in the English numbering (90 in the Greek and Latin). The Pauline passage on “trampling the Son of God” is Heb 10:29, which speaks of the sinner who tramples the Son of God; the Latin here (conculcari peccatores Filio Dei) is ambiguous and is translated as the following sentence requires.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR; footnote letter): diabolus desum in Jerusalem → diabolus Jesum in Jerusalem; proponeret, el sub → proponeret, et sub; libris el de psalmis → libris et de psalmis; tollent fe → tollent te; Unde libi → Unde tibi; nc forte loquatur → ne forte loquatur; de a saecularibus → de saecularibus; venires pigri → ventres pigri; ul sanctificet → ut sanctificet; testimonium, el interpretatur → testimonium, et interpretatur; angelos, b offendent → angelos, offendent; leonem el draconem. Quare → leonem et draconem. Quare; aspidem el basiliscum calcabis → aspidem et basiliscum calcabis; habere c nos → habere nos; ul per conversationem → ut per conversationem; leonem ct draconem → leonem et draconem; saecula sacculorum → saecula saeculorum.
Extrabiblical texts: Epimenides (Epimenides (fragments); quotation); Aratus, Phaen. 5 (Aratus, Phaenomena; quotation); Menander, Thais (Menander, Thais; quotation)
Topics: Scripture and canon, Heresy
Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Luc. 31 (PL 26:286b–288c; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-lucam/30/#p-31). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-lucam-31) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Jerome's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PL 26; digital text of the Open Greek and Latin project); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
Chapter 32
32PL 26:288c–290b
De eo quod scriptum est: Reversus est Jesus in virtute spiritus, usque ad eum locum, ubi ait: Et omnium oculi erant in synagoga intendentes in eum, Cap. IV. Primum quidem Jesus plenus Spiritu sancto reversus est a Jordane, et agebatur in spiritu in deserto diebus quadraginta. Cum tentaretur a diabolo, quia adhuc vi certaturus erat adversus eum, et semel, et bis, non cum additamento aliquo spiritus ponitur. Quando vero tres tentationes quas Scriptura commemorat, pugnando superavit, quid de spiritu signanter cauteque ponatur, ait: Et reversus est Jesus in virtute spiritus. Virtus addita est, quia conculcaverat draconem, et tentatorem cominus vicerat. Reversus est ergo Jesus in virtute spiritus in Galilaeam terram, et fama exiit per omnem regionem de eo; ipse docebat in synagogis eorum, et glorificabatur ab omnibus. Cave ne beatos illos tantum judices, et te arbitreris primum esse doctrina. Si vera sunt quae scripta sunt, non solum tunc in congregationibus Judaeorum, sed et hodie in hac congregatione Dominus loquitur: et non solum in hac, sed etiam in alio coetu, et in toto orbe docet Jesus, quaerens organa per quae doceat. Orate, ut me quoque compositum, ad canendum, aptumque reperiat. Sicut enim quaerit omnipotens Deus prophetas eo tempore quo prophetia mortales indigent, et invenit, verbi gratia Isaiam, Jeremiam, Ezechielem, Danielem: sic quaerit Deus organa per quae doceat sermonem suum, vel erudiat populos in synagogis eorum, et glorificetur ab omnibus. Nunc magis glorificatur ab omnibus Jesus, quam illo tempore quo tantum in una provincia cognoscebatur. Deinde venit Nazareth ubi nutritus fuerat, et ingressus juxta morem in synagogam die sabbatorum, surrexit legere, et datus est ei liber prophetes Isaiae, et revolvens librum et locum ubi erat scriptum: Spiritus Domini super me, propter quod unxit me (Matt. x). Non fortuitu revolvit librum, et apud se vaticinans reperit lectiones, sed et hoc providentiae Dei fuit. Sicut enim scriptum est: In laqueum non cadit passer sine voluntate Patris, Et quia capilli capitis apostolorum omnes numerati sunt: sic forsitan et hoc quod Isaiae potissimum liber inventus est; et lectio non alia, sed haec quae Christi mysterium loquebatur: Spiritus Domini super me, propter quod unxit me(Isai. xv), Christus est enim qui ista commemorat, non ut libet et casu venisse arbitrandum est, sed providentia, et dispensatione Dei. Quae sunt igitur quae in propheta loquebatur, et postea de se ipse in synagoga personet contemplemur. Evangelizare(ait) pauperibus misit me. Pauperes, nationes significant. Isti enim erant pauperes, nihil omnino possidentes, non Deum, non Legem, non Prophetas, non justitiam, reliquasque virtutes. Ob quam causam misit eum Deus, ut pauperibus nuntiaret: Praedicare captivis remissionem. Captivi nos fuimus, quos tantis annis vinxerat Satanas, habens captivos, sibique subjectos. Venit Jesus praedicare captivis remissionem, et caecis ut viderent. Sermone quippe, et praedicatione doctrinae ejus, caeci vident. Praedicatio ergo remissionis intelligatur non solum super captivis, sed etiam super caecis. Emittere confractos in libertatem. Quid ita fractum, atque collisum fuit, ut homo qui a Jesu dimissus est et sanatus? Praedicare annum Domini acceptum. Juxta simplicem intelligentiam aiunt, uno anno Salvatorem in Judaea Evangelium praedicasse, et hoc esse quod dicitur: Praedicare annum Domini acceptum, et diem retributionis: nisi forte quidam Sacramenti in praedicatione anni Domini divinus sermo significat. Futuri sunt enim alii dies, non tales quales nunc in mundo cernimus, et menses alii, et kalendarum ordo diversus. Sicut igitur ista alia, sic annus Domini futurus est placens. Ista autem omnia praedicta sunt, ut post visionem ex caecitate, post libertatem ex vinculis, post sanitatem a diversis vulneribus, veniamus ad annum Domini acceptum. Cum enim haec legisset Jesus, involvens librum reddidit ministro, et sedit, et omnium oculi erant in synagoga attendentes in eum. Et nunc si vultis, in hac synagoga coetuque possunt oculi vestri attendere in Salvatorem. Cum enim principalem cordis tui direxeris aciem ad sapientiam, et veritatem, Deique Unigenitum contemplandum, oculi tui intuentur Jesum. Beata congregatio, de qua Scriptura testatur, quod omnium oculi erant attendentes in eum. Quam vellem istum coetum simile habere testimonium, ut omnium oculi, et catechumenorum et fidelium, et mulierum et virorum, et infantium non corporis oculi, sed animae aspicerent Jesum. Cum enim respexeritis ad eum, de lumine ejus et intuitu clariores vestri vultus erunt, et dicere poteritis: Signatum est super nos lumen vultus tui, Domine (Psal. iv). Cui est gloria et imperium in saecula saeculorum. Amen.
On the text: “Jesus returned in the power of the Spirit,” up to the place where he says, “And the eyes of all in the synagogue were fixed on him.” Chapter 4. First, Jesus, full of the Holy Spirit, returned from the Jordan and was led by the Spirit in the desert for forty days. While he was being tempted by the devil, because he still had to contend against him, the Spirit is mentioned once and twice without any addition. But when he had fought and overcome the three temptations which Scripture records, see what is set down, pointedly and carefully, about the Spirit: “And Jesus returned in the power of the Spirit.” “Power” has been added, because he had trampled the dragon and defeated the tempter at close quarters. “So Jesus returned in the power of the Spirit into the land of Galilee, and a report about him went out through all the region; and he taught in their synagogues and was glorified by all.” Take care not to judge only those people blessed and to think yourself deprived of his teaching. If what is written is true, the Lord speaks not only then in the assemblies of the Jews but also today in this assembly; and not only in this one, but in other gatherings too, and in the whole world Jesus teaches, seeking instruments through which to teach. Pray that he may find me too tuned and fit for singing. For as almighty God seeks prophets at the time when mortals need prophecy, and finds them, for example Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, and Daniel, so God seeks instruments through which to teach his word, or to instruct the peoples in their synagogues, and to be glorified by all. Jesus is glorified by all now more than at the time when he was known only in one province. “Then he came to Nazareth, where he had been brought up, and, entering the synagogue on the sabbath day according to his custom, he stood up to read; and the book of the prophet Isaiah was given to him, and unrolling the book he found the place where it was written: The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he has anointed me.” It was not by chance that he unrolled the book and found the reading that prophesied of him; this too was God’s providence. For as it is written that a sparrow does not fall into the snare without the will of the Father, and that the hairs of the apostles’ heads are all numbered (Matt 10:29–30), so perhaps this too, that the book of Isaiah in particular was found, and no other reading but this one which spoke of the mystery of Christ, “The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he has anointed me” (for it is Christ who speaks these words), is to be thought to have come about not at random and by chance but by the providence and dispensation of God. Let us consider, then, what he spoke in the prophet and afterwards proclaimed of himself in the synagogue. “He has sent me,” he says, “to preach good news to the poor.” The poor signify the nations. For they were poor, possessing nothing at all: not God, not the law, not the prophets, not righteousness and the other virtues. For this reason God sent him to announce to the poor: “to proclaim release to captives.” We were the captives, whom Satan had bound for so many years, holding them captive and subject to himself. Jesus came to proclaim release to captives, and sight to the blind. For by his word and by the preaching of his teaching the blind see. The proclamation of release, then, is to be understood not only of captives but also of the blind. “To send the broken forth into freedom.” What was so broken and crushed as man, who was released and healed by Jesus? “To proclaim the acceptable year of the Lord.” According to the simple understanding they say that the Saviour preached the Gospel in Judaea for one year, and that this is what is meant by “to proclaim the acceptable year of the Lord and the day of retribution”; unless perhaps the divine word signifies some mystery in the proclamation of the year of the Lord. For there will be other days, not such as we now see in the world, and other months, and a different order of calendars. As these will be different, so the year of the Lord that is to come will be one that pleases. All these things were foretold so that, after sight in place of blindness, after freedom from chains, after healing from various wounds, we may come to the acceptable year of the Lord. “When Jesus had read these things, he rolled up the book, gave it back to the attendant, and sat down; and the eyes of all in the synagogue were fixed on him.” Now too, if you wish, in this synagogue and assembly your eyes can be fixed on the Saviour. For when you direct the chief sight of your heart to wisdom and truth and to the contemplation of the Only-begotten of God, your eyes are looking at Jesus. Blessed the congregation of which Scripture testifies that the eyes of all were fixed on him! How I would wish this assembly to have a like testimony, that the eyes of all, catechumens and faithful, women and men and children, not the eyes of the body but of the soul, should look at Jesus. For when you have looked at him, your faces will be brighter from his light and his gaze, and you will be able to say: “The light of your face has been signed upon us, Lord” (Ps 4:6). To him be glory and dominion for ever and ever. Amen.
Luke 4:14 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 4:15 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 4:1 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 4:16 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 4:17 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 4:18 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 4:19 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 4:20 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 61:1 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 61:2 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 10:29 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 10:30 (allusion, high confidence) · Ps 4:6 (4:7 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Christ returns “in the power of the Spirit” after defeating the tempter; in the Nazareth synagogue he reads Isaiah’s prophecy of himself, whose poor and captives are the nations, and the hearers are urged to fix the eyes of their souls on him.
- “Deprived of his teaching” renders “te arbitreris primum esse doctrina” (probably for privum), translated by sense. “And the day of retribution” is from Isa 61:2, not in Luke’s quotation. The view that Christ preached for one year is reported as the simple reading. Migne’s marginal references “Matt. x” and “Isai. xv” for the quotation are to Isa 61:1.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR): oculi · rant → oculi erant; Spiritu sancio reversus → Spiritu sancto reversus; Cum lentaretur → Cum tentaretur; terram, el fama → terram, et fama; quo lautum in una → quo tantum in una; Isaiae, el revolvens → Isaiae, et revolvens; sed el hoc providentiae → sed et hoc providentiae; et dum retributionis → et diem retributionis; jn praedicatione → in praedicatione; et sedit, el omnium → et sedit, et omnium; lumine ejus el intuitu → lumine ejus et intuitu; Cui esi gloria → Cui est gloria.
Topics: Christology
Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Luc. 32 (PL 26:288c–290b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-lucam/30/#p-32). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-lucam-32) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Jerome's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PL 26; digital text of the Open Greek and Latin project); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
Chapter 33
33PL 26:290b–291c
De eo quod scriptum est: Utique dicitis mihi parabolam istam, et caetera, usque ad eum locum ubi ait: Sed nullus eorum mundatus est, nisi Naaman Syrus, In Capharnaum, quantum ad lucem historiae pertinet, necdum moratus est Jesus, nec aliquod in ea signum fecisse describitur, quippe in qua non fuit. Porro antequam veniret in Capharnaum, In patria sua, hoc est, in Nazareth fuisse signatur. Utique dicitis mihi parabolam istam: Medice, cura teipsum. Quaecumque audivimus facta in Capharnaum, fac et hic in patria tua. Unde puto aliquid in sermone praesenti latitare mysterii, et Nazareth in typo Judaeorum, Capharnaum in typo praecessisse gentilium (Rom. xi). Sciens itaque Jesus quod non haberet in patria sua honorem, nec ipse, nec propheta, nec apostoli, noluit ibi praedicare, sed praedicavit in gentibus, ne sibi a patriae suae hominibus diceretur: Utique dicitis mihi parabolam istam: Medice, cura teipsum. Erit enim tempus quando dicturus sit populus Judaeorum: Quaecumque audivi facta in Capharnaum apud gentes signa atque portenta, fac et apud nos in patria tua. Quae ostendisti universo orbi, ostende et nobis. Praedica sermonem tuum populo Israel; ut saltem cum intraverit plenitudo gentium, tunc omnis Israel salvus fiat (Rom. xi). Quamobrem inibi videtur consequenti ordine Nazaraenis interrogantibus respondisse Salvator: Nemo propheta acceptus est in patria sua. Et puto plus juxta sacramentum, quam juxta litteram verum esse quod dicitur, licet Jeremias in Anatoth patria sua non fuerit acceptus (Jerem. i), et Isaias, quaecumque fuit patria illius, et reliqui prophetae; sed magis mihi videtur sic intelligi, ut dicamus patriam fuisse omnium prophetarum, populum circumcisionis, et hanc non recepisse prophetas, et eorum vaticinia: porro nationes quae longe fuerant a prophetis, et eorum notitiam non habebant, suscepisse vaticinium Jesu Christi. Nemo est ergo propheta acceptus in patria sua, hoc est in populo Judaeorum, Nos autem qui eramus alieni a testamento et peregrini a promissionibus (Ephes. ii), toto prophetas corde suscepimus, magisque habemus Moysen et prophetas de Christo praedicantes, quam illi qui ex eo quod non susceperunt Jesum, nec illos susceperunt qui de illo annuntiaverunt. Unde ad id quod dixerat: Nemo propheta acceptus in patria sua: et aliud adjungit; In veritate enim dico vobis, quia multae viduae erant in diebus Eliae in Israel, quando clausum est coelum annis tribus, et mensibus sex. Quod dicit tale est: Elias propheta erat, sed erat in populo Judaeorum. Sed quando mirabile quid facturus erat cum essent plures viduae in Israel, reliquit eas, et venit ad viduam in Sareptam Sidoniae, ad gentilem mulierculam, figuram futurae rei explicans, quia occupante fame non panis, neque siti aquae, sed fame audiendi sermonem Dei, venit ad viduam, de qua et propheta testatur dicens: Multi filii desertae, magis quam ejus quae habet virum (Isai. liv). Et cum venisset, panem illius et alimenta multiplicat. Tu eras vidua in Sarepta Sidoniae, e cujus finibus Chananaea mulier egreditur, et cupit sanari filiam suam, et propter fidem meruit accipere quod petebat. Multae ergo viduae erant in populo Israel, sed ad nullam earum missus est Elias, nisi in Sareptis ad mulierem viduam. Sed et aliud ad eumdem sensum pertinens loquitur: Multi erant leprosi in Israel in diebus Elisaei prophetae, et nemo eorum mundatus est nisi Naaman Syrus, qui utique non erat ex Israel. Considera usque ad praesentem diem multos leprosos in Israel secundum carnem, vide econtrario leprae squalore perfusos, atque spiritali Elisaeo Domino nostro et Salvatore, te autem purgari baptismi sacramento, et dici ad te: Surge et vade in Jordanem, et lavare, et restituetur tibi caro tua (IV Reg. v). Surrexit Naaman et abiit, et lotus implevit mysterium baptismi, et facta est caro ejus quasi caro pueri, qui in lavacro regenerationis ortus fuerit in Christo Jesu. Cui est gloria et imperium in saecula saeculorum. Amen.
On the text: “Doubtless you will quote to me this proverb,” and the rest, up to the place where he says, “But none of them was cleansed except Naaman the Syrian.” As far as the plain sense of the history goes, Jesus had not yet stayed in Capernaum, nor is he described as having done any sign there, since he had not been there. Moreover, before he came to Capernaum, he is recorded as having been in his own country, that is, in Nazareth. “Doubtless you will quote to me this proverb, Physician, heal yourself. Whatever we have heard was done in Capernaum, do here also in your own country.” Hence I think some mystery lies hidden in the present passage, and that Nazareth is a type of the Jews, and Capernaum a type of the Gentiles, who have gone before them (Rom 11:25). Knowing, then, that he would not have honour in his own country (neither he, nor a prophet, nor the apostles), Jesus did not wish to preach there, but preached among the Gentiles, lest the people of his own country should say to him: “Doubtless you will quote to me this proverb, Physician, heal yourself.” For there will be a time when the people of the Jews will say: Whatever signs and wonders I have heard were done in Capernaum, among the Gentiles, do among us too, in your own country; what you have shown to the whole world, show to us too. Preach your word to the people of Israel, so that at least, when the fulness of the Gentiles has come in, then all Israel may be saved (Rom 11:25–26). That is why the Saviour seems, in consequence, to have answered the questioning Nazarenes there: “No prophet is accepted in his own country.” And I think that what is said is true more according to the mystery than according to the letter, although Jeremiah was not accepted in Anathoth, his own country, nor Isaiah, whatever his country was, nor the rest of the prophets. But it seems to me rather to be understood thus: we should say that the country of all the prophets was the people of the circumcision, and that it did not receive the prophets and their prophecies, while the nations, which had been far from the prophets and had no knowledge of them, received the prophecy of Jesus Christ. No prophet, then, is accepted in his own country, that is, among the people of the Jews. But we, who were strangers to the covenant and aliens from the promises (Eph 2:12), have received the prophets with all our heart, and we have Moses and the prophets preaching of Christ more than they have, who, because they did not receive Jesus, did not receive those either who announced him. Hence to what he had said, “No prophet is accepted in his own country,” he adds something else: “But in truth I tell you, there were many widows in Israel in the days of Elijah, when the heaven was shut up three years and six months.” What he says is this: Elijah was a prophet, but he was among the people of the Jews. But when he was about to do something wonderful, though there were many widows in Israel, he left them and came to a widow in Zarephath of Sidon, a Gentile woman, unfolding a figure of what was to come: for when famine prevailed, not a famine of bread nor a thirst for water, but a famine of hearing the word of God, he came to the widow of whom the prophet too testifies, saying, “Many are the children of the desolate, more than of her who has a husband” (Isa 54:1). And when he had come, he multiplies her bread and food. You were the widow in Zarephath of Sidon, from whose borders the Canaanite woman comes out, wanting her daughter healed, and because of her faith she deserved to receive what she asked. There were many widows, then, among the people of Israel, but to none of them was Elijah sent except to the widow woman in Zarephath. And he says something else belonging to the same sense: “There were many lepers in Israel in the days of the prophet Elisha, and none of them was cleansed except Naaman the Syrian,” who surely was not of Israel. Consider the many lepers to the present day in Israel according to the flesh; see, by contrast, those covered with the squalor of leprosy cleansed by the spiritual Elisha, our Lord and Saviour, and yourself cleansed by the sacrament of baptism, and it is said to you: “Rise and go into the Jordan, and wash, and your flesh will be restored to you” (2 Kgs 5:10). Naaman rose and went, and by washing fulfilled the mystery of baptism, and his flesh became like the flesh of a child, of one born in the washing of regeneration in Christ Jesus, to whom be glory and dominion for ever and ever. Amen.
Luke 4:23 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 4:24 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 4:25 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 4:26 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 4:27 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 11:25 (allusion, high confidence) · Rom 11:26 (allusion, high confidence) · Jer 11:21 (allusion, medium confidence) · Eph 2:12 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Kgs 17:9 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Kgs 17:16 (allusion, high confidence) · Amos 8:11 (allusion, high confidence) · Isa 54:1 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 15:22 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 15:28 (allusion, high confidence) · 2 Kgs 5:10 (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Kgs 5:14 (allusion, high confidence) · Titus 3:5 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Nazareth, which rejected Jesus, stands for the Jews and Capernaum for the Gentiles; the widow of Zarephath and Naaman the Syrian prefigure the Gentile church and its cleansing in baptism.
- The homily has no heading beyond its title. Its reading of Nazareth as a type of the Jews and of the prophets’ rejection by “the people of the circumcision” is translated as written; it looks forward, with Rom 11:25–26, to the salvation of all Israel. The sentence on the lepers is garbled in the Latin (“vide econtrario leprae squalore perfusos, atque spiritali Elisaeo …”) and is translated by sense. Jeremiah’s rejection at Anathoth is Jer 11:21; the Canaanite woman is Matt 15:22–28.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR; footnote letter; split word; stray mark): per· tinet → pertinet; circumcisionis, el hanc → circumcisionis, et hanc; Nos amem qui → Nos autem qui; habemus Moyseo → habemus Moysen; facturus erat eum essent → facturus erat cum essent; reliquit eas, el venit → reliquit eas, et venit; de qua el propheta → de qua et propheta; Multi filii deserta → Multi filii desertae; Chananaea mulier. egreditur → Chananaea mulier egreditur; perfusos, a atque → perfusos, atque; et loculus implevit → et lotus implevit; in secula saeculorum → in saecula saeculorum.
Topics: Baptism
Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Luc. 33 (PL 26:290b–291c; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-lucam/30/#p-33). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-lucam-33) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Jerome's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PL 26; digital text of the Open Greek and Latin project); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
Chapter 34
34PL 26:291d–294c
De eo quod scriptum est; Magister, quid boni faciens vitam aeternam possidebo? usque ad eum locum ubi ait: Vade et tu fac similiter. Cum multa in lege praecepta sint, haec tantum Salvator in Evangelio posuit quae quodam compendio ad aeterna obedientes ducerent. Ad id enim respicit quod legis doctor interrogaverat eum dicens: Magister, quid faciens vitam aeternam possidebo? quae lectio secundum Lucam hodie vobis recitata est: respondit: In Lege quid scriptum est? Quomodo legis? Diliges Dominum Deum tuum ex toto corde tuo, et ex tota virtute tua, et ex tota mente tua, et proximum tuum tamquam teipsum. Ac deinde. Bene, ait, respondisti: hoc fac, et vives. Haud dubium quin sempiternam vitam hoc faciendo accepturus sis, de qua et legis doctor interrogaverat. Simulque perspicue docemur in legis praecepto, ut diligamus Deum, In Deuteronomio scriptum est: Audi, inquit, Israel, Dominus Deus tuus, Deus unus est. Et diliges Dominum Deum tuum ex tota mente tua, et reliqua, et proximum tuum quasi teipsum (Deut. vi). Et Salvator super his testatus est dicens: In his duobus mandatis tota Lex pendet et Prophetae (Matt. xxii), Volente autem ductore legis justificare semetipsum, et ostendere quod nemo sibi esset proximus, atque dicente: Quis est proximus meus? intulit Dominus parabolam, cujus exordium est: Homo quidam descendebat de Jerusalem in Jericho (Luc. x), et reliqua: et docet nullius fuisse proximum descendentem, nisi illius qui voluerit custodire praecepta, et praeparare se, ut sit proximus omni homini qui auxilio indiget. Hoc enim est quod post parabolam in fine ponitur. Quis de his tribus videtur tibi proximus esse ejus qui in latrones incidit? Nec enim sacerdos, nec Levites proximi ejus fuerunt; sed, ut ipse quoque legis doctor respondit, ille qui fecit misericordiam, proximus ejus fuit. Unde et a Salvatore dicitur, Vade, et tu fac similiter. Aiebat quidam de presbyteris volens parabolam interpretari, hominem qui descendit esse Adam; Jerusalem, paradisum; Jericho, mundum; latrones contrarias Fortitudines; sacerdotem, Legem; Levitem, prophetas; Samaritem, Christum: vulnera vero, inobedientiam; animal, corpus Domini; pandochium, id est, stabulum, quod universos volentes introire suscipiat, Ecclesiam interpretari. Porro duos denarios, Patrem et Filium intelligi; stabularium, Ecclesiae praesidem, cui dispensatio credita est. De eo vero quod Samarites reversurum se esse promittit, secundum Salvatoris figurabat adventum. Haec cum rationabiliter pulchreque dicantur, non est tamen existimandum quod ad omnem hominem pertineant. Neque enim omnis homo descendit de Jerusalem in Jericho, nec universi propterea in praesenti saeculo commorantur: licet ille qui missus est, propter perditas oves venerit domus Israel. Homo igitur qui de Jerusalem descendit in Jericho, quia voluit ipse descendere, propterea in latrones incidit. Latrones autem nulli sunt alii, nisi de quibus Salvator ait: Omnes qui ante me venerunt, fures fuerunt et latrones (Joan. x). Verumtamen non incidit in fures, sed in multo furibus nequiores latrones, qui descendentem eum de Jerusalem cum incidisset in illos, spoliaverunt et imposuerunt ei plagas. Quae sunt plagae? quae vulnera quibus vulneratus est homo? Vitia atque peccata. Deinde quia latrones qui nudaverant eum, et vulneraverant, non assident nudo, sed plagis rursus impositis relinquunt eum, idcirco scriptum est: Spoliantes eum, et vulnera apponentes abierunt, eo non mortuo, sed seminece. Factum est autem ut in eadem via primus sacerdos, deinde Levites descenderent, qui forsitan aliis hominibus bona quaedam fecerant, non tamen huic, qui descenderat ab Jerusalem in Jericho. Hunc enim vidit sacerdos, puto Lex vidit; Levites, ut reor, sermo propheticus. Et cum vidissent reliquerunt, et transierunt. Servabat quippe seminecem providentia ei qui fortior erat Lege et Prophetis, Samaritano videlicet, qui interpretatur custos. Iste est qui non dormitat, neque dormit custodiens Israel: propter seminecem profectus est iste Samaritanus non de Jerusalem in Jericho, sicut sacerdos et Levita descendens: aut si descendit, idcirco descendit, ut salvaret custodiretque moriturum. Ad quem locuti sunt Judaei: Samaritanus es tu, et daemonium habes (Joan. viii). Qui eum negasset se habere daemonium, Samaritem negare se noluit. Sciebat enim se custodem. Itaque cum venisset ad seminecem, et vidisset eum in suo sanguine volutari, misertus accessit ad eum ut fieret ejus proximus. Ligavit vulnera, infudit oleum vino mistum, neque dixit quod in propheta legitur: Non est malagma imponere, neque oleum, neque alligaturas (Isai. i). Iste est Samaritanus, cujus cura et auxilio omnes qui male habent, indigent. Hujus vel maxime Samaritani indigebat auxilio qui de Jerusalem descendens inciderat in latrones, et vulneratus ab eis, semianimis fuerat derelictus. Ut autem scias quod juxta providentiam Dei Samarites iste descenderit ut curaret eum qui inciderat in latrones, manifesto doceberis ex eo quod secum habebat alligaturas, secum oleum, secum vinum. Quae quidem ego puto, non propter istum unum seminecem, sed propter alios quoque qui ob varias causas fuerant vulnerati, et indigebant alligaturis, et oleo, et vino, secum portasse Samaritem. Habebat oleum de quo scriptum est: Ut exhilaret faciem in oleo (Psal. ii); haud dubium quin ejus qui curatus fuerat, oleo etiam tumores vulnerum sedarentur. Sed et vino mundat vulnera, asperitatis aliquid admiscens: eumque qui fuerat vulneratus imposuit jumento, id est, proprio corpori, juxta id quod est, hominem dignatus assumere, iste Samaritanus peccata nostra portat (Isai. liii), et pro nobis dolet, portat seminecem, inducit in pandochium, id est, in Ecclesiam, quae omnes suscipit, et nulli auxilium suum denegat, ad quam cunctos provocat Jesus dicens: Venite ad me, omnes qui laboratis et onerati estis, et ego reficiam vos (Matt. xi), Et postquam induxit eum, non statim recedit, sed uno die in stabulo cum seminece perseverat, et curat vulnera non solum in die, verum etiam in nocte, reliquam sollicitudinem suam et industriam tribuens. Cumque vellet mane proficisci, de probato argento suo, de probata pecunia sua tollit duos denarios, et onerat stabularium, haud dubium quin angelum Ecclesiae, cui praecipit ut diligenter curet eum, et ad sanitatem quaque perducat, quem pro angustia temporis etiam ipse curaverat, Duo denarii notitia mihi videtur esse Patris et Filii, et scientia sacramenti, quomodo Pater in Filio, et Filius in Patre sit: a qui vult, mercedes donantur angelo, ut diligentius curet sibi hominem commendatum, et promittitur ei quidquid de suo in medelam seminecis expenderit, illico esse reddendum. Vere Legis et prophetiae custos animarum iste Vicinior, qui fecit misericordiam ei qui inciderat in latrones, et proximus ejus apparuit non tam sermone quam opere. Quia ergo possibile est juxta illud quod sequitur, imitari nos Christum, et misereri eorum qui inciderant in latrones, accedere ad eos, ligare vulnera, infundere oleum et vinum, imponere super proprium jumentum, et ferre onera ipsorum; propterea ad talia nos cohortans Filius Dei, non tam doctori legis quam nobis quoque omnibus loquitur: Vade et tu fac similiter. Quae si similiter fecerimus, vitam consequemur aeternam in Christo Jesu, cui est gloria et imperium in saecula saeculorum. Amen.
On the text: “Teacher, what good shall I do to possess eternal life?” up to the place where he says, “Go and do likewise.” Though there are many precepts in the law, the Saviour set down in the Gospel only those which by a kind of short road lead the obedient to eternal life. For he is answering what the teacher of the law had asked him, saying, “Teacher, what shall I do to possess eternal life?” (this reading according to Luke was recited to you today). He answered: “What is written in the law? How do you read?” “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your strength and with all your mind, and your neighbour as yourself.” And then: “You have answered well,” he says; “do this and you will live.” There is no doubt that by doing this he would receive the eternal life about which the teacher of the law had asked. At the same time we are clearly taught in the precept of the law to love God. In Deuteronomy it is written: “Hear, O Israel, the Lord your God is one God. And you shall love the Lord your God with all your mind,” and the rest, “and your neighbour as yourself.” And the Saviour testified to these, saying, “On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets” (Matt 22:40). But when the teacher of the law, wishing to justify himself and to show that no one was his neighbour, said, “Who is my neighbour?” the Lord brought in a parable, which begins, “A certain man was going down from Jerusalem to Jericho,” and the rest; and he teaches that the man going down was neighbour to no one except to him who was willing to keep the commandments and prepare himself to be a neighbour to everyone who needs help. For this is what is set at the end, after the parable: “Which of these three seems to you to have been neighbour to him who fell among robbers?” For neither the priest nor the Levite was his neighbour; but, as the teacher of the law himself answered, he who showed mercy was his neighbour. Hence the Saviour says, “Go and do likewise.” One of the presbyters, wishing to interpret the parable, used to say that the man who went down is Adam; Jerusalem is paradise; Jericho, the world; the robbers, the opposing powers; the priest, the law; the Levite, the prophets; the Samaritan, Christ; the wounds, disobedience; the beast, the Lord’s body; and the pandochium, that is, the inn, which receives all who wish to enter, he interpreted as the church. Further, the two denarii are understood as the Father and the Son; the innkeeper, the head of the church, to whom its stewardship has been entrusted. And the Samaritan’s promise that he would return figured the Saviour’s second coming. Though these things are said reasonably and beautifully, it is not to be thought that they apply to everyone. For not everyone goes down from Jerusalem to Jericho, nor do all dwell in the present age for that reason, even though he who was sent came for the lost sheep of the house of Israel. The man, then, who went down from Jerusalem to Jericho fell among robbers because he himself chose to go down. And the robbers are none other than those of whom the Saviour says, “All who came before me were thieves and robbers” (John 10:8). Yet he fell not among thieves but among robbers far worse than thieves, who, when he had fallen among them on his way down from Jerusalem, stripped him and laid blows on him. What are the blows? What are the wounds with which the man was wounded? Vices and sins. Then, because the robbers who had stripped and wounded him do not stay by the naked man, but, having laid on further blows, leave him, therefore it is written: “Stripping him and inflicting wounds, they went away,” leaving him not dead but half dead. And it happened that on the same road first a priest and then a Levite went down, who perhaps had done some good to other people, but not to this man who had gone down from Jerusalem to Jericho. For the priest saw him (the law, I think); the Levite saw him (the prophetic word, I suppose). And when they had seen him, they left him and passed by. For providence was keeping the half-dead man for one who was stronger than the law and the prophets, namely the Samaritan, whose name means “guardian.” He it is who neither slumbers nor sleeps, guarding Israel. For the sake of the half-dead man this Samaritan set out, not going down from Jerusalem to Jericho as the priest and the Levite did; or, if he did go down, he went down to save and guard the dying man. To him the Jews said, “You are a Samaritan and have a demon” (John 8:48). Though he denied having a demon, he would not deny being a Samaritan; for he knew that he was the guardian. So when he came to the half-dead man and saw him rolling in his own blood, he had pity and came to him, to become his neighbour. He bound his wounds, poured on oil mixed with wine, and did not say what is read in the prophet: “There is no poultice to apply, nor oil, nor bandages” (Isa 1:6). This is the Samaritan whose care and help all who are sick need. The man who went down from Jerusalem, fell among robbers, and was wounded by them and left half alive needed this Samaritan’s help above all. And so that you may know that it was by God’s providence that this Samaritan came down to care for the man who had fallen among robbers, you will be clearly taught by the fact that he had with him bandages, oil, and wine. These, I think, the Samaritan carried with him not for this one half-dead man alone, but for others too who had been wounded for various reasons and needed bandages and oil and wine. He had the oil of which it is written, “to make the face glad with oil”; and without doubt the swellings of the wounds of the man he cared for were soothed with oil too. And with wine he cleanses the wounds, mixing in something sharp. And he set the wounded man on his beast, that is, on his own body, in that he deigned to assume a man. This Samaritan bears our sins and grieves for us (Isa 53:4); he carries the half-dead man and brings him into the pandochium, that is, into the church, which receives all and denies its help to no one, to which Jesus calls everyone, saying, “Come to me, all you who labour and are burdened, and I will refresh you” (Matt 11:28). And after he has brought him in, he does not leave at once, but stays one day in the inn with the half-dead man and tends his wounds not only by day but also by night, giving him all his care and diligence. And when he wished to set out in the morning, from his tested silver, from his tested money, he takes two denarii and charges the innkeeper (without doubt the angel of the church), commanding him to care for the man diligently and bring him to health, the man whom he himself had cared for during the short time. The two denarii seem to me to be the knowledge of the Father and the Son, and the understanding of the mystery of how the Father is in the Son and the Son in the Father. These are given as wages to the angel, so that he may care more diligently for the man entrusted to him; and he is promised that whatever of his own he spends on healing the half-dead man will be repaid at once. Truly this guardian of souls was more a neighbour than the law and the prophets: he showed mercy to the man who had fallen among robbers and proved himself his neighbour not so much in word as in deed. Since, then, according to what follows, it is possible for us to imitate Christ and to have mercy on those who have fallen among robbers, to come to them, bind their wounds, pour in oil and wine, set them on our own beast, and bear their burdens, therefore the Son of God, exhorting us to such things, speaks not so much to the teacher of the law as to all of us: “Go and do likewise.” If we do likewise, we shall attain eternal life in Christ Jesus, to whom be glory and dominion for ever and ever. Amen.
Luke 10:25 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 10:26 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 10:27 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 10:28 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 10:29 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 10:30 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 10:31 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 10:32 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 10:33 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 10:34 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 10:35 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 10:36 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 10:37 (quotation, high confidence) · Deut 6:4 (quotation, high confidence) · Deut 6:5 (quotation, high confidence) · Lev 19:18 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 22:40 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 15:24 (allusion, high confidence) · John 10:8 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 121:4 (120:4 Vulg.) (allusion, high confidence) · John 8:48 (quotation, high confidence) · John 8:49 (allusion, high confidence) · Isa 1:6 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 104:15 (103:15 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 53:4 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 11:28 (quotation, high confidence) · John 14:10 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The parable of the Good Samaritan, following an earlier presbyter’s allegory, shows Christ the true “guardian” caring for wounded humanity, bringing it into the church and entrusting it to the church’s angel; and it calls us to imitate him.
- The allegory of the parable is credited to “one of the presbyters,” unnamed. “Samaritan” is interpreted as “guardian” (Hebrew shomer), a traditional etymology. The phrase “a qui vult” before “mercedes donantur angelo” is garbled in the digital text and is passed over in the translation. “The man going down was neighbour to no one except …” is as written.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR; footnote letter; split word): scriptum eat → scriptum est; Cum inulta → Cum multa; obedi entes → obedientes; virtute tua, ei ex tota → virtute tua, et ex tota; super bis testatus → super his testatus; reliqua: ct docet → reliqua: et docet; in line ponitur → in fine ponitur; de bis tribus → de his tribus; Vade, ei iu fac → Vade, et tu fac; pandochium, c id est → pandochium, id est; Eoclesiae praesident → Ecclesiae praesidem; ante me peperunt → ante me venerunt; relinquunt cum → relinquunt eum; miserius accessit → misertus accessit; nefue alligaturas → neque alligaturas; haud dubium quim → haud dubium quin; cumque qui fuerat → eumque qui fuerat; baud dubium quin angelum → haud dubium quin angelum; ui diligentius → ut diligentius; qui ferit misericordiam ej qui → qui fecit misericordiam ei qui; oleum ct vinum → oleum et vinum; et ferro onera → et ferre onera; nobis quo-t que → nobis quoque.
Topics: Ethics
Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Luc. 34 (PL 26:291d–294c; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-lucam/30/#p-34). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-lucam-34) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Jerome's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PL 26; digital text of the Open Greek and Latin project); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.