Homilies on Joshua 19.1–20.6
Latin text: Migne, PG 12 (Latin text: Migne, Patrologia Graeca vol. 12 (1862), transcribed from library-scan OCR of the printed volume).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0).
Chapter 19
19.1PG 12:916a
Distribuit Moses luereditatem, distribuit haereo ditatem et Jesus. Sed non est scriptum in distributione haereditalis Moysi,quia cessavit terra a bellis: in distributione vero Jesu ipsa verbi praefatio sic incipit: ‹ Et cessavit, inquit , terra a bellis. »εἰ ergo tu dignus vis elIici qui hereditatem consequaris ab Jesu, et sumere ab eo portionem, oportet te prius omnia bella linire, et in pace consistere, ut etiam de tua: carnis terra dicatur. auia cessavit terra a bellis.
Moses distributed an inheritance, and Jesus too distributed an inheritance. But it is not written in Moses’ distribution of the inheritance that the land rested from wars; whereas in Jesus’ distribution the very preface of the passage begins thus: “And the land,” it says, “rested from wars.” If, then, you wish to be made worthy to obtain an inheritance from Jesus and to receive a portion from him, you must first bring all wars to an end and abide in peace, so that it may be said of the land of your flesh too that the land rested from wars.
Josh 13:8 (allusion, high confidence) · Josh 14:15 (quotation, high confidence) · Josh 11:23 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Only Joshua’s distribution of the land is preceded by rest from war, so whoever would receive an inheritance from Jesus must first end the wars within.
Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Jos. 19.1 (PG 12:916a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-iesu-nave/19-1/#p-19-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-iesu-nave-19-1) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 12, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged; sections and lost lines from Baehrens, GCS 30, where noted); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was checked afterwards privately against a modern translation (never quoted or copied); the Latin decides.
19.2PG 12:916a–916b
Tunc deinde cum consuetudo sit sancta Scripturae quatuor partes orbis terrae, quas vel axes vel plagas nominant, appellare, in descriptione Iiniumwtribus Judze, duae tantummodo nominantur, dua: reticentur. Scriptum enim sic est " : ‹ Et facti sunt lines tribus filiorum Juda secundum plebes eorum, a finibus Idumaeas, a deserto Sin, ad occidentem.»Et cum descripsisset lines ab occidente, tunc deinde dicit : Et ab oriente 44], omne , inquit, mare salsum : et alias duas partes reticuit, idest septentrionis, vel meridiani. -Vide ergo si non repleta sunt ista mysteriis. Licet nos singula vel sentire , vel explicare nequeamus, tamen prout Dominus praebere dignatur, et nos capere valemus (37} , discutere singula quisque tentabimus. Facti sunt, inquit, fines Juda secundum plebes eorum a finibus Idumaeas a deserto Sin ad dentem. Igitur IinesJudmaa proximi sunt finibnsldumteae. ldumaaa vero, sicut szepe iam diximus, interpretatur terrena. Post terrenam ergo stau‘il consequuntur lines Iudaeae. Sed et a deserto, inquit, Sin. Interpretatur autem Sin tentationes. Post tentationes ergo consequuntur lines haereditatis Jadreae. Occidens et oriens nominatur, et vicina lota ea quae supra diximus, imo confinia. Sed et vallis A‘ngpti vicina occidentalibus partibus designatur, quae est a deserto ad occidentem : ab oriente vero cinguntur fines mari salso.
Next, although it is the custom of holy Scripture to name the four parts of the world, which are called either axes or regions, in the description of the boundaries of the tribe of Judah only two are named and two are passed over in silence. For it is written thus: “And the boundaries of the tribe of the sons of Judah according to their peoples were from the borders of Idumea, from the desert of Sin, to the west.” And when he had described the boundaries from the west, he then says: “And from the east, all the salt sea”; and he passed over the other two parts in silence, that is, the north and the south. See, then, whether these things are not full of mysteries. Although we cannot perceive or explain each detail, yet as the Lord deigns to grant and we are able to grasp, we will try to discuss each point. “The boundaries of Judah were,” it says, “according to their peoples, from the borders of Idumea, from the desert of Sin, to the west.” The boundaries of Judea, then, are next to the borders of Idumea. And Idumea, as we have often said, is interpreted “earthly.” After the earthly, then, come the boundaries of Judea. “And from the desert,” it says, “of Sin.” Sin is interpreted “temptations.” After temptations, then, come the boundaries of the inheritance of Judea. West and east are named, and the places we mentioned above are neighboring, indeed adjoining. And the valley of Egypt too is marked as neighboring the western parts, which is from the desert to the west; and on the east the boundaries are girded by the salt sea.
Josh 15:1 (quotation, high confidence) · Josh 15:4 (allusion, medium confidence) · Josh 15:5 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The boundaries of Judah begin after Idumea, “earthly,” and the desert of Sin, “temptations,” and only west and east are named.
- The directions follow Origen’s Greek Bible as rendered by Rufinus (“to the west” at Josh 15:1, where the Hebrew has the south).
Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Jos. 19.2 (PG 12:916a–916b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-iesu-nave/19-1/#p-19-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-iesu-nave-19-2) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 12, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged; sections and lost lines from Baehrens, GCS 30, where noted); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was checked afterwards privately against a modern translation (never quoted or copied); the Latin decides.
19.3PG 12:916b–917a
Post hoc, ‹ a collibus, inquit , qui tenduntur ad occidentem, et inde ascenditur ab occidente usque Cades Barne , et sic pertenditur ab occidente ad occidentem Cades. Et hi sunt fines eorum Ι) ab Africo, et inde perrexit usque ad vallem Algypti. Vides quomodo in occidentis partibus et Africum et Egyptum nominat et occasum? Sine dubio, ut haec omnia sciat sibi unusquisque evadenda esse et transeunda, ut ita demum possit ad tribum regiam pervenire, de qua dicit Apostolus “ : ί Certum est autem quod cx Juda ortus est Dominus noster. ivero.... interpretatur terrena. Ab finibus autem ldumzeaa est desertum. Paulo ante diximus de deserto Sin , quod tentationes significaret, et ideo necesse est' nos transire eremum tentationum, ut sic possimus pervenire in haereditatem filiorum Juda. Sed et ascendere nos oportet ascensum collium Acrabin, quod interpretatur scorpiones. Transeundi ergo nobis sunt et calcandi etiam scorpiones, illi sine dubio de quibus Salvator ait : Ecce dedi vobis potestatem, calcaudi super serpentes, et scorpiones. Qui ergo vult, et desiderat ingredi in haereditatem tribus Judze, oportet eum ascendere ascensioncs istas, et calcare atque evadere scorpiones qui obsistunt. Unde arbitror quod istud iter agenti Ezechieli propheta: dicebat Dominus “ : Fili hominis, in medio scorpionum tu habitas. - Et sunt, inquit , ‹ fines usque Cades. Gades interpretatur sanctum vel sanctificatio. Fines ergo Judae usque ad sanctificationem perveniunt.
After this: “from the hills,” it says, “that stretch to the west; and from there one goes up from the west as far as Kadesh-barnea, and so it extends from the west to the west of Kadesh. And these are their boundaries on the southwest, and from there it went on to the valley of Egypt.” You see how in the western parts it names the southwest, and Egypt, and the setting? Undoubtedly so that each one may know that all these things must be escaped and passed through by him, so that only then can he come to the royal tribe, of which the Apostle says: “For it is evident that our Lord sprang from Judah.” … is interpreted “earthly.” And beyond the borders of Idumea is the desert. A little before, we said of the desert of Sin that it signified temptations; and therefore we must cross the desert of temptations, so that we may thus come into the inheritance of the sons of Judah. But we must also climb the ascent of the hills of Akrabbim, which is interpreted “scorpions.” We must, then, pass over and trample even the scorpions, those undoubtedly of which the Saviour says: “Behold, I have given you power to tread on serpents and scorpions.” He, then, who wishes and desires to enter the inheritance of the tribe of Judah must climb these ascents and trample on and escape the scorpions that stand in his way. Hence I think that the Lord said to the prophet Ezekiel, as he made this journey: “Son of man, you dwell in the midst of scorpions.” “And the boundaries are,” it says, “as far as Kadesh.” Kadesh is interpreted “holy” or “sanctification.” The boundaries of Judah, then, reach as far as sanctification.
Josh 15:3 (quotation, high confidence) · Josh 15:4 (quotation, high confidence) · Heb 7:14 (quotation, high confidence) · Josh 15:1 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 10:19 (quotation, high confidence) · Ezek 2:6 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The southern and western boundaries of Judah teach that the believer must pass through the earthly, the desert of temptations, and the ascent of scorpions to reach Kadesh, “sanctification.”
- Migne’s apparatus printed into the line has been removed; part of the sentence on Idumea is lost in the Migne scan. The interpretations of the place names are Origen’s.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne’s marginal references and an apparatus note printed into the line): Δ “ibid. 5. “ibid. Idem : valemus. Libi). editi, raleamus. → .
Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Jos. 19.3 (PG 12:916b–917a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-iesu-nave/19-1/#p-19-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-iesu-nave-19-3) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 12, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged; sections and lost lines from Baehrens, GCS 30, where noted); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was checked afterwards privately against a modern translation (never quoted or copied); the Latin decides.
19.4PG 12:917b–921a
Sed videamus etiam qui sint fines ex partibus orientalibus. Non quo velim nunc locorum catalogum facere, sed ut mysteriorum quae per lucc significantur, contueamur (4‘2) imagines. Dicitur ergo ab orientis partibus tribus Iudae mare esse salsum, et post hoc in parte ejus nominatur fons solis, et civitas solis, et in eadem tribu esse etiam civitas litterarum. Oportet igitur omnem qui vult introire in partem filiorum Juda, transire prius mare salsum, vitae scilicet hujus undas et turbines superare. et evadere omnia quae in hoc tuundo pro incerto Sui et lubrico marinis fluctibus comparantur , ut possit ad Jud:e terram pervenire, et ad fontem solis accedere. Quis autem eSt fons solis, vel cujus solis? illius sine dubio , de quo scriptum est : Timentibus autem nomen incum orietur sol justitim. Hujus ergo solis, si prius evaseris mare salsum, fontem invenies in terra ludas. Quem fontem? Illum profecto, de quo dicebat Jesus: Qui autem biberit de aqua quam ego do ei , fiet in eo fons aqua: salientis in vitam aeternam. llujus igitur solis cum talem qualem diximus inveneris fontem, invenies etiam civitatem ejus. Est enim , inquit , ibi et civitas solis. Dicitur et in Egypto civitas solis. Sed ista civitas quae in [Egypto est, hujus solis nomen accepit, quem Pater cmlcstis jubet oriri super bonos et malos. Illa vero civitas quae iu Judaea est, sanctorum tantummodo efficitur, quia civitas Dei est. Et fons ille de quo superius diximus, fluvius efi'ectus est lzetificaus civitatem Dei. Sed et tu si ex omni parte munitus sis, et continentiae muro circumdatus, si sapientiae et magnanimitatis turribus confirmatus es, etiam tu erlicieris civitas Dei. Si vero ad haec omnia adjeceris tibi scientim lumen , sicut dixit Isaias 9 : Illuminate vobis lumen scientiae, › et sol te justitiae radiaverit, efficieris etiam tu civitas solis, vel civitatem solis sorte hazreditatis accipies. Sed et si te’tradideris legi Dei, et in ipsa meditaberis die ac nocte, ut non recedat liber legis de manu tua, sicut dicitur ad Jesum, et si memor sis przecepti Salvatoris in qu.) ait : Scrutamini Scripturas; › si ergo talibus te studiis mancipaveris, et eruditionem legis divina. vel legendo , vel audiendo obtinueris , tuae portionis efficietur civitas litterarum. Et haec quidem nos pro possibilitate sensus nostri, vel etiam pro vestri auditus capacitate discussimus : summa vero scientiae, et profundior ac lucidior horum intelligentia apud illos erit, qui veram limrcditatem veri et unigeniti Filii Dei, quae repromissa est iis , qui eum perfecte dilexeriut, consequi merebuntur in Christo Jesu Domino nostro, cui est gloria et imperium in sa:cula saaculorum. Amen.
But let us see also what the boundaries are on the eastern side. Not that I wish to draw up a catalogue of places now, but that we may contemplate the images of the mysteries that are signified by these things. It is said, then, that on the eastern side of the tribe of Judah is the salt sea, and after this the spring of the sun and the city of the sun are named in its portion, and that in the same tribe there is also the city of letters. Everyone, then, who wishes to enter into the portion of the sons of Judah must first cross the salt sea, that is, overcome the waves and storms of this life and escape everything in this world that is compared to the waves of the sea for its uncertainty and slipperiness, so that he may come to the land of Judah and approach the spring of the sun. And what is the spring of the sun, or of which sun? Undoubtedly of the one of whom it is written: “But for you who fear my name the Sun of righteousness will rise.” Of this sun, then, if you first escape the salt sea, you will find the spring in the land of Judah. What spring? That one, surely, of which Jesus said: “But whoever drinks of the water that I will give him, it will become in him a spring of water welling up to eternal life.” When, then, you find such a spring of this sun as we have described, you will also find its city. For there is there, it says, also a city of the sun. A city of the sun is spoken of in Egypt too. But that city in Egypt took its name from this sun, which the heavenly Father commands to rise on the good and the evil; whereas the city in Judea belongs only to the saints, because it is the city of God. And the spring of which we spoke above has become the river that gladdens the city of God. And you too, if you are fortified on every side and surrounded by the wall of self-control, if you are strengthened with the towers of wisdom and magnanimity, will yourself become a city of God. But if to all these you add the light of knowledge, as Isaiah said, “Light for yourselves the light of knowledge,” and the Sun of righteousness shines on you, you too will become a city of the sun, or will receive the city of the sun by the lot of inheritance. And if you give yourself to the law of God and meditate on it day and night, so that the book of the law does not depart from your hand, as was said to Jesus, and if you remember the Saviour’s command where he says, “Search the Scriptures” — if, then, you devote yourself to such studies and gain learning in the divine law, whether by reading or by hearing, the city of letters will become your portion. These things we have discussed as far as our understanding allows, and according to the capacity of your hearing; but the sum of knowledge, and a deeper and clearer understanding of these things, will belong to those who will be found worthy to obtain the true inheritance of the true and only-begotten Son of God, which has been promised to those who have loved him perfectly, in Christ Jesus our Lord, to whom is glory and dominion for ages of ages. Amen.
Josh 15:5 (allusion, high confidence) · Josh 15:7 (allusion, high confidence) · Josh 15:15 (allusion, high confidence) · Mal 4:2 (3:20 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · John 4:14 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 19:18 (allusion, low confidence) · Matt 5:45 (allusion, high confidence) · Ps 46:4 (45:5 LXX) (allusion, high confidence) · Hos 10:12 (quotation, medium confidence) · Josh 1:8 (allusion, high confidence) · Ps 1:2 (allusion, high confidence) · John 5:39 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: On Judah’s eastern side lie the salt sea, the spring and city of the sun, and the city of letters: the believer crosses the sea of this life to reach Christ, the Sun of righteousness, and the city of letters is won by study of Scripture.
- The spring of the sun is En-shemesh (Josh 15:7) and the city of letters Kiriath-sepher (Josh 15:15); the city of the sun in Egypt is Heliopolis. The saying “Light for yourselves the light of knowledge” is from the Greek of Hos 10:12, here cited as Isaiah. After the doxology the Migne scan printed a Latin translation of a Greek fragment of the next homily and that homily’s heading; these are not Rufinus’s text and have been removed by a logged correction. A few words garbled in the Migne scan after “What spring?” are read from Baehrens's edition.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne’s Latin version of a Greek fragment of the next homily (Philocalia 12) and the heading of Homily 20, printed after the doxology; not Rufinus’s text): venire , qui tantum capiat utilitatis , adhortari vo lumus audientes, ne animum inter legendum despondeam. Quodnam igitur solatium sit, ne suecutnbat , qui ei lectioni interest, dicendum. Quemadmodum igitur carmina vim quamdam habent insitam, utque imprudens aliquid a carmine accipit, qui incantatur, ea nimirum est natura sonorum carminis, sive in damnum, sive ad sanitatem corporis vel animi sui : sic velim existimes oumi carmine potentiorem esse significationem nominum divinae Scriptum. Sunt enim quaadam in nobis virtutes, quarum quae meliores sunt, per base veluti carmina, quibus cutn cognatae atque afiines sint, aluntur, nobis non percipientibus virtutes iutelligentes ea quae dicuntur, potentiores in nobis fieri ad vita: nostra: subsidium atque adiumentum. Esse quippe in nobis, quae non videantur, eaque multa , indicabit psalmus qui dicit : Benedic, anima mea, Domino, et omnia qua; intra me sunt nomini sancto ejus. Sunt igitur in nobis plurima: virtutes , qua: veluti sortitione animas nostras et corpora possident, quae, si sanctae sint, lectione Scriptura: juvantur, et validiores fiunt; etsi mens nostra fructum non sentiat, quemadmodum scriptum est de eo, qui lingua loquitur“ : t Quia spiritus meus orat, mens autem mea sine fructu est. ο Cogita igitur, cum aliquando mens nosua fructum non percipit, virtutes quae animo et tuenti et nobis omnibus subsidio sunt, boc rationabili, quod a sacris litteris et unmi« nibus est, nutrimento educari, et educatas fieri ad nos iuvandos potentiores. Ut igitur meliores virtutes veluti θ permulceatur et juvantur, fiuntque per ejusmodi li:m teras et nomina potentiores; sic adversaria: in nobis virtutes divinis carminibus deducuntur, ut ita dicam, et vincuntur, et victae sopiuntur- : et si quis unquam nostrum vidit carminibus sopitam aspidem, aut aliud e venenatis, illud assumat ad Scripturam exemplum: quae si legatur nec intelligatur, interdum languescit et succumbit auditor; et credat quae in se sunt aspides, et quae in se viperaa, imbecilliores fieri medicamentis curantium, quemadmodum a sapiente Mose, a sapiente Jesu, τι sapientibus sanctis prophetis. Non igitur animo langueamus, cum audimus Scripturas quas non intelligimus, sed fiat nobis secundum fidem nostram, qua et credimus quia onmis Scriptura divinitus inspirata utilis est . Alterum enim e duobus admittere te oportet in iis Scripturis, vel non esse divinitus datas, siquidem utiles non sunt, ut suspicetur aliquis infidelis : vel ut fidelis admitte, quia utiles sunt, divinitus esse datas. Sciendum est igitur nobis nec sentientibus persaepe utilitatem venire, quemadmodum saepe cibum aliquem sumere jubemur acuendis oculis, necdum tamen in'eo sumendo left-mf, τῇ ἀπὸ {pia turbari”. sanguine! (Lagi- 111,16. . lib. vm, cap. 10, ct lib. xxvtn, cap. 9. EA DEM HOMILIA XX. INTERPBETE RUFlNO. De difficultate intelligentia’, et fde Caleb quomodo accepit Chebron, et de filiabus ejus. → .
Topics: Scripture and canon
Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Jos. 19.4 (PG 12:917b–921a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-iesu-nave/19-1/#p-19-4). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-iesu-nave-19-4) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 12, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged; sections and lost lines from Baehrens, GCS 30, where noted); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was checked afterwards privately against a modern translation (never quoted or copied); the Latin decides.
Chapter 20
20.1PG 12:921a–923c
Si quibus possibile est ascendere ad terram sanctam, ct bonam terram viventium, in qua mors non est, si quis per spiritum meruit ad haec videnda conscendere, ille potest verius nosse [nereditatum, et locorum et appellationum quae in his locis scriptae sunt, dill‘erentias. Verum quia dillicile est ita eruditam, vel gratia spiritus repletam invenire anima ιη, conabimur nos consolationis commonis causa, ne forte taedio eiliciatur auditoribus sermo divinus et lectio, si nihil explanationis accipiat, orantibus vobis, et Domino donante haec interim de hujuscemodi lectionibus perstringere, quae aediflcare possint animas nostras. Si qua autem sunt, quae vel nos ad prmsens sentire non possumus, vel vos nondum potestis audire, ex his tamen quae disserimus corrcctiores atque emendatiores redditi, etiam illa quae nunc capere non possumus, meliores eliccti comprehensuros nos sperare debemus. Et quidem optimum erit htec assequi, dum in hac vita smnus, ubi laboris praemium justum est : sin minus, post obitum fortasse inuotescent iis qui merebuntur. Verumtamen etiam illud admoneo, non parum ex hoc ipso utilitatis anima: conferri, quod aures nostras licet Mobscura videattlur, penetrant. Si enim creditum est a gentibus, quod quaedam carmina, quas praecantationes appellant, quibus ι) istud artis est, insusurrantes, nominibus (5'5) quibusdam compellatis quze ne illi quidem qui invocant, norunt, ex solo vocis sono vel sopiunt scrpentes, vel etiam de cavernis protrahunt ahstrusis. Saepe autem et in corporibus humanis tumores, vel l‘ervores, aut alia hujuscemodi voce sola reprimere dicuntur, interdum etiam animae vari stuporem quemdam sensus infligere, ubi tamen Christi non restiterit lides : quanto magis totius praecantatiouis, et carminis validiorem et potentiorem duccndam credimus quamcunque illam Scripturze sanctae, vel sermonum, vel nominum appellationem? Sicut enim apud infideles contrariae virtutes audientes illa velilla nomina in carminibus, vel pramantationihus, adsunt et exhibent famulatum, et dant operam in hoc, ad quod invocari sc ex illo vel ex illo nomine senserint, ollicii sui rem quodammodo ac ministerii cui semetipsos mancipavcriut dependentes: eo magis utique etelestus virtutes et angeli Dei. qui nobiscum smtt, sicut et Dominus de parvulis Ecclesia: dicit", quia angeli eorum semper assistunt in conSpectu Domini, videntes faciem ejus, libenter et grate accipiunt, si semper verba Scriptnrze, et horum nominum appellationes velut carmina quaedam et prmcantationes ex nostro ore promamus. Quia etsi nos non intelligimus quae de ore proferinms, illae tamen virtutes quae nobis adsunt intelligunt, et velut carmine quodam invitatze adesse nobis, et ferre auxilium delectantur. Quia autem sunt non solum circa nos multa: divinae virtutes, sed etiam intra nos, indie-at: Propheta cum dicit in Psalmis“ : «Benedic, ani-. ma mea, Dominum, et omnia interiora mea, nomen sanctum ejus. lloc est omnia quae intra me sunt. Constat ergo multas esse virtutes intra nos, quibus vel animarum nostrarum, vel corporum cura permissa est, quae utique si sanctae sunt, cum Seriptura: leguntur ο nobis, delectantur, et validiores erga nostri diligentiam fiunt si linguis loquamur, et spiritus noster oret, sensus antem' noster sine fructu sit . Dixit enim et hoc sanctus Apostolus, et mirum quodammodo mysterium humanis aurihus protulit, dicens aliquando licri posse, ut spiritus qui in nobis est oret, et sensus noster sine fructu sit. Intellige ergo ex hoc, quia fit aliquando uoster quidem sensus sine l'ructu : spiritus autem, id est virtutes illae, quae animae nostrae in adiutorium datae. sunt, pascuntur et relieiuntur ex auditu Scriptura: sanctae, velut ex divinis et rationabilibus cibis. Quid diro quia divina: virtutes pascantur et epuleutur in nobis, si nos verba divinae Scriptum proferamus ex ore? Ipse Dominus noster Jesus Christus si nos inveniat his vacantes, et hujuscemodi studiis et exercitus operam dantes, non solum pasci et refici dignatur in nobis, verum etiam si bas epulas apud nos viderit apparatas, Patrem secum dignatur adducere..Sed haec quia satis magna et supra hominem videntur, non meis tibi, sed ipsius Domini et Salvatoris sermonibus comprobentur dicentis” : ‹ Amen dico vobis quia ego et Pater veniemus, et mansionem faciemus, et etenabimus apud etim. ο Quem? illum profecto qui sua mandata custodit. Sed, sicut diximus, quia ex hujuscemodi meditationibus, divinarum erga nos virtutum consortia et oIiicia provocamus : ita e contrario malignarum virtutum insidias, et pessimorum daemonum incursiones, ex hujuscemodi sermonum et nominum appellationibus efi'ugamus. Verbi gratia, ut si quis vestrum aliquando perspexit praecantationibus sopitum serpentem portari in manibus, vel protrahi de cavernis nihil valentem nocere venenis, utpote incantationis virtute torpentibus : ita etiam lectionis divina: virtute, si quis intra nos est contrariae potestatis serpens, si quis ad insiliandum coluber latet, si patienter feras, si non taedio fatigatus avertas auditum, Scripturae carminibus et divini sermonis assiduitate depellitur.
If there are any who are able to ascend to the holy land and the good land of the living, in which there is no death, if anyone has been found worthy by the Spirit to climb up to see these things, he can know more truly the differences of the inheritances, and of the places and names that are written in these passages. But since it is difficult to find a soul so learned or so filled with the grace of the Spirit, we will try, for the sake of the common consolation — lest perhaps the divine word and the reading become tedious to the hearers if it receives no explanation — with your prayers and with the Lord’s gift, to touch meanwhile on such things in readings of this kind as can edify our souls. And if there are things that either we cannot perceive at present or you cannot yet hear, still, made more correct and better by the things we discuss, we ought to hope that, having become better, we shall also grasp those things we cannot grasp now. And indeed it would be best to attain these things while we are in this life, where the reward of labor is just; if not, perhaps they will become known after death to those who are found worthy. Yet I also give this admonition, that no small benefit is conferred on the soul by the very fact that these words enter our ears, even if they seem obscure. For the Gentiles believe that certain songs, which they call incantations, whispered by those who have this art, with certain names invoked which not even those who invoke them understand, by the mere sound of the voice put serpents to sleep or even draw them out of their hidden holes; and they are often said by voice alone to check swellings or fevers or other such things in human bodies, and sometimes even to inflict on the soul a kind of stupor of the senses, where the faith of Christ has not resisted. How much more, then, must we believe that every utterance of holy Scripture, whether of words or of names, is stronger and more powerful than any incantation and song? For as among unbelievers the contrary powers, hearing this or that name in songs or incantations, come and render service, and work at that for which they perceive themselves invoked by this or that name, in a way bound to the business of their office and of the ministry to which they have given themselves over: so much the more do the heavenly powers and angels of God who are with us — as the Lord says of the little ones of the church, that their angels always stand in the sight of the Lord, seeing his face — receive it gladly and gratefully if we continually bring forth from our mouth the words of Scripture and the utterance of these names, like certain songs and incantations. For even if we do not understand what we bring forth from our mouth, yet the powers that are present with us understand, and, as if invited by a song, they delight to be with us and to bring us help. And that there are many divine powers not only around us but also within us, the prophet indicates when he says in the Psalms: “Bless the Lord, O my soul, and all my inmost parts, his holy name,” that is, all that is within me. It is clear, then, that there are many powers within us to whom the care of our souls or our bodies has been entrusted; and these, if they are holy, are delighted when the Scriptures are read to us and become stronger in their care for us, even if we speak in tongues and our spirit prays but our mind is unfruitful. For the holy Apostle said this too, and brought to human ears a wonderful mystery, as it were, saying that it can sometimes happen that the spirit which is in us prays while our mind is unfruitful. Understand from this, then, that our mind is sometimes unfruitful, but the spirit, that is, those powers that have been given to help our soul, are fed and refreshed by hearing holy Scripture, as by divine and rational food. Why do I say that divine powers are fed and feast within us if we bring forth the words of divine Scripture from our mouth? Our Lord Jesus Christ himself, if he finds us occupied with these things and giving effort to studies and exercises of this kind, not only deigns to be fed and refreshed in us, but also, if he sees these banquets prepared with us, deigns to bring the Father with him. But since these things seem very great and beyond man, let them be proved to you not by my words but by those of the Lord and Saviour himself, who says: “Amen, I say to you, that I and the Father will come and make our dwelling and dine with him.” With whom? Surely with him who keeps his commandments. But, as we said, just as by meditations of this kind we call forth the fellowship and services of the divine powers toward us, so on the contrary by the utterance of words and names of this kind we put to flight the snares of the evil powers and the attacks of the most wicked demons. For example, just as some of you have sometimes seen a serpent put to sleep by incantations and carried in the hands, or drawn out of its holes, unable to harm with its poisons, since they are numbed by the power of the incantation, so also by the power of the divine reading, if there is within us a serpent of the contrary power, if some snake lies hidden to lie in wait, it is driven out by the songs of Scripture and by persistence in the divine word — if you bear it patiently, if you do not turn your hearing away, worn out by weariness.
Ps 116:9 (114:9 LXX) (allusion, low confidence) · Matt 18:10 (allusion, high confidence) · Ps 103:1 (102:1 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 14:14 (allusion, high confidence) · John 14:23 (quotation, high confidence) · Rev 3:20 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Even when the lists of names in Joshua are not understood, hearing Scripture benefits the soul: as pagan incantations act through names, the words of Scripture strengthen the angelic powers within and around us and drive away the demons.
- Origen compares the reading of Scripture with incantations, as in the Greek fragment of this homily preserved in the Philocalia (ch. 12). Lines of Migne’s Latin version of that fragment, printed into this section in the scan, have been removed by a logged correction; a few words garbled in the Migne scan after “to inflict on the soul” are read from Baehrens's edition. The saying “I and the Father will come … and dine with him” joins John 14:23 with Rev 3:20.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (lines of Migne’s Latin version of the Greek fragment (Philocalia 12) printed into the column; not Rufinus’s text): oculum sentimus; sed secunda vel tertia interjecta die distributio cibi qui oculum juvat, facit ιιι experti credamus, oculo nos esse levatos ε sed et in reliquis cibis, quihusdam partibus corporis utilibus, id intueri licet. Sic igitur et de divina Scriptura certmn habe, juvari animum, etsi mens fructum non percipiat ejus, quae a litteris e nuda sola lectione protluit, utilitatis: ineantantur enim quae in nobis sunt, aluntur meliora, pejora irrita liunt. → .
Topics: Scripture and canon
Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Jos. 20.1 (PG 12:921a–923c; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-iesu-nave/19-1/#p-20-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-iesu-nave-20-1) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 12, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged; sections and lost lines from Baehrens, GCS 30, where noted); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was checked afterwards privately against a modern translation (never quoted or copied); the Latin decides.
20.2PG 12:923c–924b
Si ergo vides, ο auditor, aliquandolegis Scripluram in auribus tuis quam non intelligis, ct sensus ejus tibi videtur obscurus, interim hanc primam suscipe utilitatem, quod solo auditu velut praecantatioue quadam, noxiarum virtutum, quae te obsident et quae tibi insidiantur, virus depellitur et fugatur. Observa tantum ne cificiaris sicut aspides surd:e, et obturantes aures suas , ne audiant vocem incantationis et veneficii, quod incantatur a Sapienle. Verbi causa, est carmen quod prmcanlatur et canitur a sapiente Mose, et quod praecantatur et canitur a sapiente Jesu Nave, et quod prteeanlatur et canitur a sapientibus omnibus prophetis. Haec autem ideirco diximus, ne fastidium capiamus audientes Scripturas, etiam si non intelligimus, sed Iiat nobis secundum fidem nostram, credentibus quia omnis Scriptura divinitus inspirata utilis est . Si ergo divinitus inspirata est et utilis, etiamsi non sentiamus utilitatem, credere tamen debemus quia utilis est. Solent medici pra bere interdum cibum aliquem, interdum etiam potnt: dare, verbi gratia ad discutiendam caliginem visus: M5 nec tamen in edendo ipso cibo, vel in potando sentimus quia utile est, et prodest curiis: sed cum transierit dies una et altera et tertia (till, suo in tempore per occultos quosdam meatus relata ad visum cibi illius aut poculi virtus, paulatim per» gat aspectum, et tunc demum sentire incipimus, quia cibus ille vel potus profuit oculis. Sed etin aliis similiter corporis partibus eadem fieri soteat. Hoc ergo modo credendum est etiam de Scriptura sancta, quia utilis est, et anima: prodest, etianni sensus noster ad presens intelligentiam non capit, quoniam, ut diximus, et bonae virtutes quae nobis adsunt, reficiuntur in his sermonibus et pascuntur, et contrariae torpescunt bis meditationibus, et επηgantur. Sed fortasse dicitur ab auditoribus: Περ nobis idcirco dicis, ut te ab oflicio disputationis excuses et in iis finias, neque quidquam prorsus rei ex iis quibus possibile est, consolationis exhibeas, neque ut Dominum depreceris prmstare gratim suam ad revelauda ca quae lecta sunt, ut parvam saltem cibum ex occultorum et secretorum explanatione sumamus. Non ista de causa hac diximus, nec excusantes nos ista protulimus, sed ut ostenderemus iu Scripturis sanctis esse vim quam dam, quae legenti etiam sine erplanatione sulcial.
If, then, O hearer, you sometimes hear a Scripture read in your ears that you do not understand, and its sense seems obscure to you, meanwhile take this first benefit: that by the mere hearing, as by a kind of incantation, the poison of the harmful powers that besiege you and lie in wait for you is driven out and put to flight. Only take care that you do not become like the deaf asps that stop their ears so as not to hear the voice of the charmer and of the charm that is sung by the wise man. For example, there is a song that is chanted and sung by the wise Moses, and that is chanted and sung by the wise Jesus son of Nun, and that is chanted and sung by all the wise prophets. We have said these things, then, so that we may not grow disgusted when we hear the Scriptures, even if we do not understand them, but that it may be done to us according to our faith, believing that all Scripture inspired by God is useful. If, then, it is inspired by God and useful, even if we do not perceive its usefulness, we must nevertheless believe that it is useful. Physicians sometimes give some food, or sometimes a drink, for example to clear dimness of sight; and yet in eating the food or drinking we do not feel that it is useful and benefits the eyes; but when one day, then a second and a third have passed, the power of that food or drink, carried to the sight in its own time through certain hidden passages, gradually cleanses the sight, and then at last we begin to feel that the food or drink has benefited the eyes. And the same thing usually happens in the other parts of the body as well. In this way, then, we must believe also of holy Scripture that it is useful and benefits the soul, even if our mind does not grasp its meaning at present; because, as we said, both the good powers that are with us are refreshed and fed by these words, and the contrary powers are numbed by these meditations and put to flight. But perhaps the hearers will say: You are telling us this to excuse yourself from the duty of discussion and to stop at this, without offering us any consolation at all from what is possible, and without praying the Lord to grant his grace to reveal what has been read, so that we may take at least a little food from the explanation of hidden and secret things. We did not say these things for that reason, nor did we put them forward as an excuse, but to show that there is a certain power in holy Scripture that suffices for the reader even without explanation.
Ps 58:4 (57:5 LXX) (allusion, high confidence) · Ps 58:5 (57:6 LXX) (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 9:29 (allusion, high confidence) · 2 Tim 3:16 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Like a medicine whose effect is felt only later, Scripture benefits the hearer even when not understood, since it has a power of its own even without explanation.
- Migne’s marginal references and apparatus printed into the line have been removed.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne’s marginal references and apparatus notes printed into the line): Lvitt, 4, 5. II Tim. Codex Sangerm., obduranlcs. (6οι βε canitur. Deest in libb. editis, sed legitur → .
Topics: Scripture and canon
Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Jos. 20.2 (PG 12:923c–924b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-iesu-nave/19-1/#p-20-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-iesu-nave-20-2) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 12, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged; sections and lost lines from Baehrens, GCS 30, where noted); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was checked afterwards privately against a modern translation (never quoted or copied); the Latin decides.
20.3PG 12:924b–925a
Nune vero, quoniam non nobis suflicit tempus ut de omnibus quae lecta sunt disseramus, vel pauca Saltem, proutDominns donaverit, perstringeo mus. Initium distribuendre hmreditatis quam Iesus distribuit, incipit a Calcb.Data est etenim huic Caleb portiouis sua: sors priusquam tribus sua, quae est εν Iiorum Juda, perciperet; et datur ei non in extremis aliquibus partibus, sed in medio filiorum Juda :etdata est ei portio non per sortem, sed per praeceptum Domini, et datur ei civitas iutegra.Quem alium dignum erat talem consequi haereditatem, et talem percipere portionem, nisi (Zaleb, qui solus salvus enectus est cum Jesu Nave, ex sexcentis millibus armatorume exierant de IEgypto ἰν Ipsum oportebat accipere metropolim. Et ideo scriptum est 7°: Deditei Iesus civitatem Arbnc metropolim Enacb, quae est Chebron, in qua erant memoria: patrum. IIic igitur civitate Arboc, quae erat metropolis Enacb , qua est Chebron, exterminavit inde tres filios Enacb. Quid putas nobis volens Scriptura ostendere etiam hoc designavit, quod Caleb accepta portione [Hereditatis suae, et tres filios Enacb exterminavit, et nomina eorum descripsit,id est Susui, Aehimacb, et Thalami, generationes Enach? Videamus ergo quid estquod nec sufficit ei dicere filios Enach, sed et nomina ipsorum addidit, et super omnia adjecit”, Istae erant generationes Enaeh. Sed et in eonsequentibus refert, quod, accepta haereditatis sorte, Caleb ascendit ad eos qui habitabant Dahir. Νοmen autem Dabir erat prius civitas litterarum. Videndum ergo est quid est quod prius erat civitas litterarum, et postea facta est Dahir.
But now, since there is not enough time for us to discuss everything that has been read, let us at least touch briefly on a few things, as the Lord grants. The distribution of the inheritance that Jesus distributed begins with Caleb. For the lot of his portion was given to this Caleb before his tribe, that of the sons of Judah, received its own; and it is given to him not in some remote parts but in the midst of the sons of Judah; and the portion was given him not by lot but by the command of the Lord, and a whole city is given him. Who else was fit to obtain such an inheritance and receive such a portion, if not Caleb, who alone was saved with Jesus son of Nun out of the six hundred thousand armed men who had come out of Egypt? It was right that he should receive the mother city. And so it is written: “Jesus gave him the city of Arba, the mother city of Anak, which is Hebron,” where the tombs of the fathers were. From this city of Arba, then, which was the mother city of Anak, that is, Hebron, he exterminated the three sons of Anak. What do you think Scripture wished to show us when it noted this too, that Caleb, having received the portion of his inheritance, exterminated the three sons of Anak, and recorded their names, Sheshai, Ahiman, and Talmai, the generations of Anak? Let us see, then, why it is not enough for it to say “the sons of Anak,” but it also adds their names, and on top of all this adds: “These were the generations of Anak.” And in what follows it relates that, having received the lot of his inheritance, Caleb went up against the inhabitants of Debir. And the name of Debir was formerly the City of Letters. We must see, then, what it means that it was formerly the City of Letters and afterwards became Debir.
Josh 14:13 (allusion, high confidence) · Josh 14:14 (allusion, high confidence) · Num 14:30 (allusion, high confidence) · Num 14:38 (allusion, high confidence) · Num 1:46 (allusion, medium confidence) · Josh 15:13 (quotation, high confidence) · Josh 15:14 (quotation, high confidence) · Num 13:22 (allusion, medium confidence) · Josh 15:15 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Caleb, who alone with Joshua survived of those who left Egypt, receives the first portion, Hebron, the mother city of Anak, expels Anak’s three sons, and goes up against Debir, once called the City of Letters.
- Migne’s apparatus printed into the list of names has been removed. Origen counts Caleb as the only one saved with Joshua (Num 14:30, 38).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne’s apparatus notes printed into the line): Iidem et lecta sunt. Libb. editi_: dicta sunt. Omnes mss. oportebat. the quae erat “Chebron. _el → .
Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Jos. 20.3 (PG 12:924b–925a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-iesu-nave/19-1/#p-20-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-iesu-nave-20-3) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 12, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged; sections and lost lines from Baehrens, GCS 30, where noted); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was checked afterwards privately against a modern translation (never quoted or copied); the Latin decides.
20.4PG 12:925a–925b
Praeterea refertur, quia et filiam habens Caleb proposuerit talem quamdam conditionem dicens“: ‹ Quicunque exscindere potuerit civitatem litterarum, et obtinuerit eam, dabo ei Axam filiam meam uxorem. Cumque ille hoc proposuisset, Gothoniel filius Chenner frater Caleb junior cepit civitatem litterarum. Sed et ipsum quaastionis locum Scriptura sancta posuerit, si tamen, ut diximus, nihil Otiose in his verbis prmtereundum, quod Gothoniel frater esse dicitur Caleb, et Caleb filius scribitur Jell‘one, et Gothoniel filius Chenner. Quomodo ergo videbitur frater esse Caleb, qui non est filius Jeffone, sed ille dicitur filius Jell‘one, iste autem filius Chenner, qui dicitur cepisse civitatem litterarum? De quo additur, quia et junior erat, et per conditionem virtutis merito acceperit Axam tiliam Caleb uxorem, quia exscidit et perdidit civitatem littera- Exiens autem de domo patris sui Axa, quae ei ex certa conditione nuptum tradita est, sedens super asinum dicebat viro suo : Petam a patre meo portionem agri. Et exclamavit de monte, et dixit ei Caleb,Quid est tibi? et dixit ei : Da mihi benedictionem, quia in terra austri nuptum me tradidisti. Et accepit Gonetlam superiorem, et Gonetlam inferiorem. » Et conclusit Scriptura dicens: llaac est. haereditas tribus Juda. › Videtis quia vere auxilio Dei opus est, ut hcce explanari queant? impossibile prorsus est ullum hominum de iis disserere, nisi illuminatus per Dei gratiam fuerit. ideo ergo juvate me orationibus, et mecum pariter laborante, ut Dominus in his tam obscuris et absconditis locis lucem veritatis nobis dignetur ostendere, nt et nos vobis possimus aperire quomodo haec vera et utilia et divina sunt, sed pro fragilitate humanae naturae obtecta sacramentis et involuta mysteriis.
It is further related that Caleb, who had a daughter, proposed a condition, saying: “Whoever is able to destroy the City of Letters and take it, I will give him Achsah my daughter as his wife.” And when he had proposed this, Othniel son of Kenaz, Caleb’s younger brother, took the City of Letters. Holy Scripture has also set down this point for inquiry — if indeed, as we said, nothing in these words is to be passed over idly — that Othniel is said to be Caleb’s brother, while Caleb is written as the son of Jephunneh and Othniel as the son of Kenaz. How, then, will he be seen to be Caleb’s brother who is not the son of Jephunneh, since the one is called the son of Jephunneh and the other, who is said to have taken the City of Letters, the son of Kenaz? Of him it is added that he was also younger, and that by the condition set for valor he rightly received Achsah, Caleb’s daughter, as his wife, because he destroyed and wiped out the City of Letters. And Achsah, going out of her father’s house, she who had been given in marriage on a fixed condition, sitting on a donkey, said to her husband: “I will ask my father for a portion of a field.” And she cried out from the mountain, and Caleb said to her: “What is the matter with you?” And she said to him: “Give me a blessing, because you have given me in marriage in the land of the south.” “And she received the upper Gonetla and the lower Gonetla.” And Scripture concluded, saying: “This is the inheritance of the tribe of Judah.” You see that truly the help of God is needed so that these things can be explained? It is altogether impossible for any man to discuss them unless he has been enlightened by the grace of God. Therefore help me with your prayers and labor together with me, that the Lord may deign to show us the light of truth in such obscure and hidden places, so that we too may be able to make clear to you how these things are true and useful and divine, though, because of the frailty of human nature, covered with sacraments and wrapped in mysteries.
Josh 15:16 (quotation, high confidence) · Josh 15:17 (quotation, high confidence) · Josh 15:18 (quotation, high confidence) · Josh 15:19 (quotation, high confidence) · Josh 15:20 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Origen sets out the puzzles of Othniel’s capture of the City of Letters, his relation to Caleb, and Achsah’s request for the upper and lower springs, and asks for prayers to explain them.
- “Gonetla” is the Greek Bible’s form for Gulloth, the springs Achsah asked for (Josh 15:19).
Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Jos. 20.4 (PG 12:925a–925b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-iesu-nave/19-1/#p-20-4). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-iesu-nave-20-4) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 12, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged; sections and lost lines from Baehrens, GCS 30, where noted); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was checked afterwards privately against a modern translation (never quoted or copied); the Latin decides.
20.5PG 12:925b–927a
Primo ergo discutiamus quare metropolim ac- ο cepit Caleb, et illam quae prima inter caeteras omnes in terra repromissionis metropolis nominatur, et metropolim Enach. Enach interpretatur Immilitas inanis, vel responsio inanis. Accepit ergo Caleb metropolim humilitatis inanis. Duas humllitates esse certum est. Unam laudabilem, de qua dicit Salvator : ‹ Discite a me, quia mitis sum et humilis corde, et invenietis. requiem animabus vestris. Et de hac humilitate dictum est , quia omnis qui se humiliat, exaltabitur. Et alibi ε ο llumiliamini sub-potentissima manu Dei. › Es; autem et alia humilitas culpabilis peccatorum, sicut illa quam de illicito coitu dicit Scriptura, quia humiliavit illam, quod de Ammon scriptum est,quia humiliavit Thamar sororem suam . Est ergo humilitas inanis quae descendit ex peccato. Hujus igitur humilitatis inanis metropolim cepit vel exscidit Caleb, et interemit tres filios Euach, qui erant filii inanis humilitatis, et illis interfectis ipse habitat civitatem, et facit quae in consequentibus scripta sunt. Qui autem sunt isti filii inanis humilitatis quos exterminavit Caleb ? Primus Susui qui interpretatur eastra me, hoc est extra sanctum, quia extra sanctum est filius inanis humilitatis, imo et extra Deum. Est et alius Achiman, qui interpretatur frater nteus extra consilium, velut si dicamus frater sine consilio. Omnes etenim fratres qui de humilitate inani nascuntur, certum est quia et cxtra consilium sunt. Tertius Thalami, qui interpretatur pra’cipitium vel suspensio : quod designat nihil in eo stabilitatis, sed vaga omnia et in praeceps ruentia. Istos ergo tres filios Enach exterminavit et interfecit Caleb, et post istos descendit in Dahir. ϐ Nomen erat Dabir prius civitas litterarum. Dabir interpretatur loquela. Sed nomen Dahir, prius civitas litterarum. Igitur civitatem litterarum intellige omne Testamenti Veteris instrumentum: id est et hanc ipsam quam nunc disserere conamur Scripturam , intelligamus esse civitatemlitterarum, quae postmodum efficiatur Dahir, quod est loquela. llaec etenim quae prius in litteris erat, et secundum litterarum intelligebatur, modo in Ecclesiis Christo revelante Domino, loquela effecta est, loquentibus et disserentibus primo sanctis apostolis, et removentibus superficiem litterae, proferentihus vero de ea spiritalem loquelam. Sed et singuli quique doctores Ecclesiarum litteram legis loquelam, et disputationem evangelicamv faciunt. Qui autem sunt tres filii Enach, quos Caleb,iu cujus persona virtutem legis ascripseramus , interimit? Inanis humilitas accipienda est illa, quam omnes hujus sa:cnli poetae vel philosophi de divinitate senserunt, quia et humilia et Deo indigna sunt quae senserunt. Quid enim tam humile et quid tam inaniter humile quam ligna et lapides deos vel astruere vel putare? Hujus ergo inanis humilitatis filius primus est Susui, qui dicitur extra me, hoc est primus sensus eorum et extra veritatem, et extra Deum est. Secundus vero Achiman, id est frater sine consilio. Rectum est vero, quia et istc frater sitillius erroris qui sine consilio geritur. Quid enim tam sine consilio est, quam relinquere Deum qui nos fecit, et sequi eos quos nos fecimus? 'l‘ertius erroris sensus est Thalami, quod est praecipitium vel suspensio. Novissima namque hujus erroris tendunt in praecipitium et in profundum inferni. Ergo hos gentilitatis sensus tanquam filios Enach vetusti erroris abscidit lex, quae etiam secundum litteram Deum verum et Creatorem omnium praedicat.
First, then, let us discuss why Caleb received a mother city, and the one that is named first among all the others in the land of promise as a mother city, the mother city of Anak. Anak is interpreted “empty humility” or “empty answer.” Caleb, then, received the mother city of empty humility. It is certain that there are two humilities. One is praiseworthy, of which the Saviour says: “Learn from me, for I am meek and humble of heart, and you will find rest for your souls.” And of this humility it is said that “everyone who humbles himself will be exalted”; and elsewhere: “Humble yourselves under the mighty hand of God.” But there is also another, blameworthy humility, that of sinners, such as the one Scripture speaks of in the case of unlawful intercourse, that “he humbled her,” as was written of Amnon, that he humbled his sister Tamar. There is, then, an empty humility that comes down from sin. Of this empty humility, then, Caleb took or destroyed the mother city, and killed the three sons of Anak, who were the sons of empty humility; and having killed them he himself inhabits the city and does the things written in what follows. And who are these sons of empty humility whom Caleb exterminated? The first is Sheshai, which is interpreted “outside me,” that is, outside the holy, because the son of empty humility is outside the holy, indeed outside God. Another is Ahiman, which is interpreted “my brother outside counsel,” as if we were to say “a brother without counsel.” For all the brothers who are born of empty humility are certainly outside counsel. The third is Talmai, which is interpreted “precipice” or “suspension,” which signifies that there is nothing stable in it, but everything wandering and rushing headlong. These three sons of Anak, then, Caleb exterminated and killed, and after them he went down to Debir. The name of Debir was formerly the City of Letters. Debir is interpreted “speech.” But Debir was formerly called the City of Letters. By the City of Letters, then, understand the whole instrument of the Old Testament: that is, let us understand this very Scripture that we are now trying to discuss to be the City of Letters, which afterwards becomes Debir, that is, speech. For these things that were formerly in letters, and were understood according to the letter, have now become speech in the churches, Christ the Lord revealing them, as first the holy apostles spoke and discussed them, removing the surface of the letter and bringing forth from it spiritual speech. And each of the teachers of the churches too turns the letter of the law into speech and Gospel discourse. But who are the three sons of Anak whom Caleb kills, in whose person we have placed the power of the law? The empty humility must be taken to be what all the poets and philosophers of this world thought about the divinity, because what they thought is both lowly and unworthy of God. For what is so lowly, and so emptily lowly, as to assert or suppose that wood and stones are gods? The first son of this empty humility, then, is Sheshai, who is called “outside me”; that is, their first thought is both outside the truth and outside God. The second is Ahiman, that is, “a brother without counsel.” And rightly, for this is the brother of that error which proceeds without counsel. For what is so without counsel as to abandon God who made us and to follow those whom we made? The third thought of error is Talmai, that is, “precipice” or “suspension.” For the last end of this error tends toward the precipice and the depth of hell. These thoughts of paganism, then, as sons of Anak of the ancient error, the law cut off, the law which even according to the letter proclaims the true God and Creator of all.
Josh 15:13 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 11:29 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 14:11 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Pet 5:6 (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Sam 13:14 (quotation, high confidence) · Josh 15:14 (allusion, high confidence) · Josh 15:15 (allusion, high confidence) · 2 Cor 3:6 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Anak means “empty humility,” the humiliation of sin and the lowly ideas of poets and philosophers about the divine; its three sons stand for the errors of idolatry, which the law cuts off, and Debir, “speech,” shows the letter of the Old Testament turned into spiritual speech in the church.
- The interpretations of the names are Origen’s. “Humbled her” is the Greek Bible’s expression for rape in 2 Sam 13:14.
Topics: Scripture and canon
Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Jos. 20.5 (PG 12:925b–927a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-iesu-nave/19-1/#p-20-5). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-iesu-nave-20-5) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 12, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged; sections and lost lines from Baehrens, GCS 30, where noted); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was checked afterwards privately against a modern translation (never quoted or copied); the Latin decides.
20.6PG 12:927a–928a
Sed nunc ascendit Caleb ad istam civitatem litterarum,et dixit : ς Quicunque exsciderit civitatem istam litterarum, et obtinuerit eam, dabo ei Axam filiam meam uxorem. Et cepit eam Gothoniel filius Chenner. Gotboniel autent qui accepit civitatem litterarum, interpretatur responsio Dei. Responsio autem Dei dici potest cui respondet Dens, hoc est cui revelat secreta, et pandit arcana. lste ergo est qui potest accipere civitatem litterarum, et veteris instrumenti exscindere litteram occidentem. Frater Caleb junior. Ego autem sum de Ecclesia frater Caleb junior, qui exscissa ac discussalegis littera, sensum in ea spiritualem requiro. Exscindo autem litteram, cum jam non secundum carnem circnmcidor, neque secundum carnem azyma tnanduco, neque Pascha cum Judzeis observo, neque Sabbatum secundum litteram curo. Promissum namque mihi est, quia, si exscidero civitatem litterarum, accepturus sint filiam fratris mei majoris. Eram namque prius filius Chenncr, qui interpretatur spretio. Quis enim erat spretio, sicut nos gentes alienati a conversatione Israel, spem non habentes, et sine Deo in boc mundo? Nam prior ille frater meus, cujus nunc accipio filiam pro eo quod exscidi civitatem litterarum, ille filius Jell‘one fuit, qui interpretatur conversio. Dat mihi ergo tiliam suam, id est scientiam Dei sui, vel intelligentiam mihi minori fratri dat lex, secundum quod scriptum est : ‹ Auferetur a vobis regnum Dei, et dabitur genti facienti fructus ejus. Sciendum tamen est aliud esse legem, cujus nunc personam dedimus Caleb, aliud litteram Veteris Testamenti,quam civitatem liguraliter diximus litterarum. Accepta ergo lilia ejus ego frater ejus juniur educo eam de domo patris sui. Quae cum venerit mecum sedeas super asinum (super quem asinum ? illum sine dubio quem solverant discipuli Salvatoris), dicit ad patrem suum '9 : r Da mihi benedictionem, pater. Et accepit Gonetlam superiorem, et Gonetlam inierinrem. 441 Quod evidentius Apostolus dicit ’°: Pollicitationem habens vitae ejus quae nunc est et futurae. Et ut Salvator repromittit iis qui ver- ’ bi sui perfectionem sequuntur, quia accipiant tnplmn itt praesenti sa:culo, in futuro autem vitam azternam consequantur οι. Hoc estergo arcepisse in benedictione Gonetlam superiorem, et Gonetlam inferiorem. Quam benedictionem oremus et et nos consequi mereamur, per Christum Deinum nostrmn , cui est gloria et imperium in saeui: saeculorum. Amen
But now Caleb goes up to this City of Letters and says: “Whoever destroys this City of Letters and takes it, I will give him Achsah my daughter as wife. And Othniel son of Kenaz took it.” Othniel, who took the City of Letters, is interpreted “answer of God.” He can be called an answer of God to whom God answers, that is, to whom he reveals secrets and opens hidden things. He, then, is the one who can take the City of Letters and destroy the killing letter of the Old Instrument. “Caleb’s younger brother.” And I, from the church, am Caleb’s younger brother, who, having destroyed and thoroughly examined the letter of the law, seek the spiritual sense in it. And I destroy the letter when I am no longer circumcised according to the flesh, nor eat unleavened bread according to the flesh, nor keep the Passover with the Jews, nor observe the Sabbath according to the letter. For it has been promised me that, if I destroy the City of Letters, I shall receive the daughter of my elder brother. For I was formerly the son of Kenaz, which is interpreted “contempt.” For who was contempt as we Gentiles were, alienated from the commonwealth of Israel, having no hope, and without God in this world? But that elder brother of mine, whose daughter I now receive because I destroyed the City of Letters, was the son of Jephunneh, which is interpreted “turning.” He gives me, then, his daughter; that is, the law gives to me, the younger brother, the knowledge of its God, or understanding, as it is written: “The kingdom of God will be taken from you and given to a nation producing its fruits.” We must know, however, that the law, whose person we have now given to Caleb, is one thing, and the letter of the Old Testament, which we have figuratively called the City of Letters, is another. Having received his daughter, then, I, his younger brother, lead her out of her father’s house. And when she comes with me, sitting on a donkey (on what donkey? undoubtedly the one that the Saviour’s disciples untied), she says to her father: “Give me a blessing, father. And she received the upper Gonetla and the lower Gonetla.” The Apostle says this more plainly: “Having the promise of the life that now is and of that which is to come.” And so the Saviour promises to those who follow the perfection of his word that they will receive a hundredfold in this present age, and in the age to come will obtain eternal life. This, then, is to have received in blessing the upper Gonetla and the lower Gonetla. Let us pray that we too may be found worthy to obtain this blessing, through Christ our Lord, to whom is glory and dominion for ages of ages. Amen.
Josh 15:16 (quotation, high confidence) · Josh 15:17 (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Cor 3:6 (allusion, high confidence) · Eph 2:12 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 21:43 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 21:2 (allusion, high confidence) · Josh 15:18 (allusion, high confidence) · Josh 15:19 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Tim 4:8 (quotation, high confidence) · Mark 10:30 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Othniel, “answer of God,” who takes the City of Letters and marries Caleb’s daughter, is the Gentile church, which destroys the killing letter, receives from the law the knowledge of God, and gains blessings for this life and the next.
- The Gentile church is presented as the younger brother that leaves the literal observance of circumcision, unleavened bread, Passover, and Sabbath; translated as written.
Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Jos. 20.6 (PG 12:927a–928a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-iesu-nave/19-1/#p-20-6). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-iesu-nave-20-6) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PG 12, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged; sections and lost lines from Baehrens, GCS 30, where noted); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was checked afterwards privately against a modern translation (never quoted or copied); the Latin decides.