On the Trinity 1–7
Latin text: PL 3 (Latin text: J.-P. Migne, Patrologia Latina 3, digitized by Open Greek and Latin, University of Leipzig (patrologia_latina-dev), CC BY-SA 4.0).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0). Compare: Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 5 (1886).
Chapter 1
1PL 3:913a–915b
Regula exigit veritatis ut primo omnium credamus in Deum Patrem et Dominum omnipotentem, id est, rerum omnium perfectissimum conditorem, qui coelum alta sublimitate suspenderit, terram dejecta mole solidaverit, maria soluto liquore diffuderit, et haec omnia propriis et condignis instrumentis et ornata et plena digesserit. Nam et in solidamento coeli luciferos solis ortus excitavit, lunae candentem globum ad solatium noctis mensurnis incrementis orbis implevit, astrorum etiam radios variis fulgoribus micentis lucis accendit: et haec omnia legitimis meatibus circumire totum mundi ambitum voluit, humano generi dies, menses, annos, signa, tempora, utilitatesque factura. In terris quoque altissimos montes in verticem sustulit, valles in ima dejecit, campos aequaliter stravit, animalium greges ad varias hominum servitutes utiliter instituit. Silvarum quoque robora humanis usibus profutura solidavit, fruges in cibum elicuit, fontium ora reseravit, et lapsuris fluminibus infudit. Post quae, ne non etiam ipsis quoque deliciis procurasset oculorum, variis florum coloribus ad voluptatem spectantium cuncta vestivit. In ipso quoque mari, quamvis esset et magnitudine et utilitate mirabile, multimoda animalia, nunc mediocris, nunc vasti corporis finxit, ingenium artificis de institutionis varietate testantia. Quibus non contentus, ne forte fremitus et cursus aquarum, cum dispendio possessoris humani, alienum occuparet elementum, fines littoribus inclusit: quo cum fremens fluctus et ex alto sinu spumans unda venisset, rursum in se rediret, nec terminos concessos excederet, servans jura praescripta: ut divinas leges tanto magis homo custodiret, quanto illas etiam elementa servassent. Post quae hominem quoque mundo praeposuit, et quidem ad imaginem Dei factum: cui mentem et rationem indidit et prudentiam, ut Deum posset imitari: cujus etsi corporis terrena primordia, coelestis tamen et divini halitus inspirata substantia: quem, cum omnia in servitutem illi dedisset, solum liberum esse voluit. Et ne in periculum caderet rursum soluta libertas, mandatum posuit, quo tamen non inesse malum fructu arboris doceretur, sed futurum, si forte ex voluntate hominis de contemptu datae legis praemoneretur. Nam et liber esse debuerat, ne incongruenter Dei imago serviret: et lex addenda, ne usque ad contemptum dantis libertas effraenata prorumperet: ut et praemia condigna et merita poenarum consequenter exciperet, suum jam habens illud, quod motu mentis in alterutram partem agitare voluisset: ex quo mortalitas, invidia utique, in ipsum redit; qui cum illam de obedientia posset evadere, in eamdem incurrit, dum ex consilio perverso Deus esse festinat: cujus tamen poenam nihilominus indulgenter temperavit, dum non tam ipse, quam labores ejus maledicuntur super terram. Nam et quod requiritur, non ex ignorantia venit, sed spem hominis futurae in Christo et inventionis et salutis ostendit: et quod ne de ligno arboris vitae contingat arcetur, non de invidiae maligno livore descendit, sed ne vivens in aeternum, nisi peccata Christus ante donasset, circumferret secum in poenam sui semper immortale delictum. Quanquam etiam superioribus, id est super ipsum quoque solidamentum partibus, quae non sunt hodie nostris contemplabiles oculis, Angelos prius instituerit, spiritales Virtutes digesserit, Thronos Potestatesque praefecerit, et alia multa coelorum immensa spatia, et sacramentorum infinita opera condiderit, ut Immensus hic licet mundus pene novissimum magis Dei corporalium rerum appareat opus esse, quam solum. Namque quae infra terram jacent, neque ipsa sunt digestis et ordinatis potestatibus vacua. Locus enim est quo piorum animae impiorumque ducuntur, futuri judicii praejudicia sentientes: ut operum ipsius in omnibus partibus redundantes magnitudines non intra mundi hujus, capacissimos licet, ut diximus, sinus conclusas videremus, sed etiam infra ipsius mundi et profunda et altitudines cogitare possemus; et sic considerata operum magnitudine, tantae molis digne mirari possemus artificem.
The rule of truth requires that first of all we believe in God the Father and Lord Almighty, that is, the most perfect Maker of all things, who hung the heavens on high, made the earth firm as a mass set low, poured out the seas in flowing water, and arranged all these things, both adorned and filled with their own fitting furnishings. For in the firmament of heaven he raised the light-bearing risings of the sun; he filled the gleaming globe of the moon with monthly increases of its orb to comfort the night; he kindled the rays of the stars with the varied flashes of their twinkling light; and he willed that all these should go round the whole circuit of the world in their lawful courses, to produce for the human race days, months, years, signs, seasons, and benefits. On the earth, too, he raised the highest mountains to a peak, sank the valleys into the depths, spread out the plains evenly, and usefully appointed herds of animals for the various services of men. He also made firm the oaks of the forests, to be of use to human needs; he brought forth crops for food; he unsealed the mouths of springs and poured them into flowing rivers. After this, so that he should not fail to provide even for the delight of the eyes, he clothed all things with the varied colors of flowers for the pleasure of those who behold them. In the sea itself too, though it was wonderful both in size and in usefulness, he fashioned many kinds of creatures, now of moderate, now of vast body, bearing witness by the variety of what he established to the skill of the Artisan. Not content with these, lest the roaring and running of the waters should seize an element not its own, to the loss of its human possessor, he enclosed its boundaries with shores: so that when the roaring flood and the wave foaming from the deep gulf came up to them, it would turn back upon itself and not go beyond the limits allowed it, keeping the laws prescribed: so that man might keep the divine laws all the more, since even the elements had kept them.
After this he also set man over the world, and indeed man made to the image of God, into whom he put mind and reason and prudence, so that he might be able to imitate God. Though the first beginnings of his body were earthly, yet his substance was breathed in from a heavenly and divine breath. And when he had given all things into his service, he willed that he alone should be free. And lest freedom, once unbound, should in turn fall into danger, he laid down a command, by which man was taught, not that there was evil in the fruit of the tree, but he was forewarned that evil would come if by chance man's will should lead him to despise the law he had been given. For he had to be free, lest the image of God should unfittingly be a slave; and a law had to be added, lest liberty, unbridled, should break out even to contempt of the Giver: so that he might receive, as a consequence, both fitting rewards and deserved punishments, having as his own whatever he had chosen to pursue, by the movement of his mind, in one direction or the other. From this, mortality, through envy indeed, comes back upon man himself: though he could have escaped it by obedience, he ran into it while, following perverse counsel, he hastened to become God. Yet God nonetheless tempered his punishment mercifully, in that not so much he himself as his labors are cursed upon the earth. For the fact that he is sought for does not come from ignorance, but shows the hope of man's future finding and salvation in Christ; and the fact that he is kept from touching the tree of life does not come down from the malicious spite of envy, but is done lest, living forever, unless Christ had first forgiven his sins, he should carry about with him, to his own punishment, a sin forever undying.
And yet in the higher parts too, that is, even above the firmament itself, which are not visible to our eyes today, he had earlier established angels, ordered spiritual Powers, set Thrones and Authorities over them, and founded many other immense spaces of the heavens and infinite works of mysteries, so that this world, immense though it is, appears to be rather almost the last of God's works among bodily things than the only one. For the regions that lie beneath the earth are not themselves empty of ordered and arranged powers. For there is a place to which the souls of the godly and the ungodly are led, already feeling a foretaste of the judgment to come: so that we might see the overflowing greatness of his works in every part, not shut up within the bosom of this world, spacious as it is, as we have said, but might also be able to contemplate the depths and heights even beneath the world itself; and so, having considered the greatness of his works, we might worthily marvel at the Artisan of so vast a structure.
Gen 1:14 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 1:26 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 1:28 (allusion, medium confidence) · Gen 2:17 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 3:5 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 3:9 (allusion, medium confidence) · Gen 3:17 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 3:22 (allusion, high confidence) · Col 1:16 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The rule of truth begins with faith in God the Father, the Creator of heaven, earth, sea, and man, whom he made free and gave a command, and of unseen realms above and below.
- Allusions to Gen 1:14–28; 2:17; 3:5, 9, 17, 22–24 (Migne's references: Gen 1:14, 27, 28; 2:17; 3:5, 22–24). “From this, mortality, through envy indeed, comes back upon him”: the clause is compressed and the text uncertain; “envy” may be the devil's (cf. Wis 2:24). The place beneath the earth where souls await judgment reflects the common early belief in an intermediate state. The number 889 in the digital text is Migne's column number and is removed.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne column number in the text; OCR: broken word; OCR: e for c; OCR: letter dropped; OCR: nr misread for m; OCR: split word; OCR: uncertain characters; stray footnote marker): dejecta nrole → dejecta mole; a l voluptatem → ad voluptatem; cuneta vestivit → cuncta vestivit; quato illas → quanto illas; in congruenter → incongruenter; inventionis (II) et → inventionis et; mun(??)lus → mundus; sinus 889 conclusas → sinus conclusas.
Topics: Trinity, Eschatology, Creation, Free will
Cite (SBL): Novatian, Trin. 1 (PL 3:913a–915b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/novatian-trinitate/1). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/novatian-trinitate/1
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-novatian-trinitate-1) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin text of Migne, PL 3 (1865 printing), corrected where the digitization is faulty; made independently of existing English translations.
Chapter 2
2PL 3:915b–917c
Super quae omnia ipse continens cuncta, nihil extra se vacuum deserens, nulli Deo superiori (ut quidam putant) locum reliquit. Quandoquidem ipse universa sinu perfectae magnitudinis et potestatis incluserit, intentus semper operi suo, et vadens per omnia, et movens cuncta, et vivificans universa, et conspiciens tota, et in concordiam elementorum omnium discordantes materias sic connectens, ut ex disparibus elementis ita sit unus mundus ista coagmentata conspiratione solidatus, ut nulla vi dissolvi possit, nisi cum illum solus ipse qui fecit, ad majora alia praestanda nobis, solvi jusserit. Hunc enim legimus omnia continere: et ideo nihil extra ipsum esse potuisse; quippe cum originem omnino non habeat, consequenter nec exitum sentiat: nisi forte, quod absit, aliquando esse coeperit, nec super omnia sit, sed dum post aliquid esse coeperit, infra id sit quod ante ipsum fuerit, minor inventus potestate, dum posterior denotatur etiam ipso tempore. Ob hanc ergo causam semper immensus, quia nihil illo majus est: semper aeternus, quia nihil illo antiquius. Id enim quod sine origine est, praecedi a nullo potest, dum non habet tempus. Ideo immortalis, non deficiens in consummationis exitu. Et quoniam sine lege est quidquid sine origine est, modum temporis excludit, dum se debitorem nemini sentit. De hoc ergo, ac de eis quae sunt ipsius et in eo sunt, nec mens hominis quae sint, quanta sint, et qualia sint, digne concipere potest, nec eloquentia sermonis humani aequabilem majestati ejus virtutem sermonis expromit. Ad cogitandam enim et ad eloquendam illius majestatem et eloquentia omnis merito muta est, et mens omnis exigua est: major est enim mente ipsa, nec cogitari possit quantus sit, ne si potuerit cogitari, mente humana minor sit, qua concipi possit. Major est quoque omni sermone, nec edici possit: ne si potuerit edici, humano sermone minor sit, quo, cum edicitur, et circumiri et colligi possit. Quidquid enim de illo cogitatum fuerit, minus ipso erit: et quidquid enuntiatum fuerit, minus illo comparatum circum ipsum erit. Sentire enim illum taciti aliquatenus possumus; ut autem ipse est, sermone explicare non possumus. Sive enim illum dixeris Lucem, creaturam ipsius magis quam ipsum dixeris; ipsum non expresseris: sive illum dixeris Virtutem, potentiam ipsius magis quam ipsum dixeris et deprompseris: sive dixeris Majestatem, honorem ipsius magis quam illum ipsum descripseris. Et quid per singula quaeque percurrens longum facio? semel totum explicabo. Quidquid omnino de illo retuleris, rem aliquam ipsius magis et virtutem, quam ipsum explicaveris. Quid enim de eo condigne aut dicas, aut sentias, qui omnibus et sermonibus et sensibus major est? Nisi quod uno modo (et hoc ipsum quomodo possumus, quomodo capimus, quomodo intelligere licet) quid sit Deus mente capiemus, si cogitaverimus id illum esse, quod quale, et quantum sit non possit intelligi, nec in ipsam quidem cogitationem possit venire. Nam si ad solis aspectum oculorum nostrorum acies hebescit, ne orbem ipsum obtutus inspiciat obviorum sibi superatus fulgore radiorum: hoc idem mentis acies patitur in cogitatione omni de Deo; et quanto ad considerandum Deum plus intenditur, tanto magis ipsa cogitationis suae luce caecatur. Quid enim de eo (ut iterum repetam) condigne dicas, qui est sublimitate omni sublimior, et altitudine omni altior, et profundo omni profundior, et omni luce lucidior, et omni claritate clarior, omni splendore splendidior, omni robore robustior, omni virtute viritior, omni pulchritudine pulchrior, veritate omni verior, et fortitudine omni fortior, et majestate omni major, et omni potentia potentior, et omnibus divitiis ditior, omni prudentia prudentior, et omni benignitate benignior, omni bonitate melior, omni justitia justior, omni clementia clementior? Minora enim sint necesse est omnium genera virtutum eo ipso, qui virtutum omnium et Deus et Parens est: ut vere dici possit, id Deus esse, quod ejusmodi est cui comparari nihil potest. Super omne est enim quod dici potest. Mens est enim quaedam gignens et complens omnia, quae sine ullo aut initio aut termino temporis, causas rerum naturaliter nexas ad utilitatem omnium summa et perfecta ratione moderetur.
Above all these he himself contains all things, leaving nothing empty outside himself, and he has left no room for a God superior to him (as some think). Since he has enclosed all things in the bosom of his perfect greatness and power, he is always intent upon his work: he passes through all things, moves all things, gives life to all things, beholds all things, and joins discordant matter into a harmony of elements, so that out of unlike elements one world has been made firm, bound together in such a union that it cannot be dissolved by any force, except when he alone who made it orders it to be dissolved, in order to provide other and greater things for us. For we read that he contains all things, and therefore nothing could exist outside him. Since he has no origin at all, he consequently experiences no end: unless perhaps (which God forbid) he began to exist at some time, and is not above all things, but, having begun to exist after something, is below that which existed before him, found to be less in power since he is marked as later even in time. For this reason, then, he is always immeasurable, because nothing is greater than he; always eternal, because nothing is older than he. For what is without origin can be preceded by nothing, since it is not subject to time. Therefore he is immortal, not failing in the end of a final dissolution. And since whatever is without origin is without law, he shuts out the measure of time, since he feels himself debtor to no one.
Concerning him, then, and the things that are his and in him, neither can the mind of man worthily conceive what they are, how great they are, and of what kind, nor does the eloquence of human speech put forth a power of speech equal to his majesty. For all eloquence is rightly dumb, and every mind is too small, to conceive and to express his majesty. For he is greater than the mind itself, and it cannot be conceived how great he is, lest, if he could be conceived, he should be less than the human mind by which he could be grasped. He is greater also than all speech and cannot be expressed, lest, if he could be expressed, he should be less than human speech, by which, when he is expressed, he could be encompassed and gathered up. For whatever is thought about him will be less than he; and whatever is uttered will be less than he when compared with him. We can in some measure perceive him in silence, but we cannot unfold him in speech as he is. For if you call him Light, you name his creature rather than himself; you have not expressed him. If you call him Power, you name and set forth his might rather than himself. If you say Majesty, you have described his honor rather than himself. And why should I make a long matter of it by running through each item? I will explain the whole at once. Whatever you say of him at all, you will have explained some attribute and power of his rather than himself. For what can you fittingly say or think of him who is greater than all words and all thoughts? Except that in one way (and this in so far as we can, as we grasp it, as it is permitted to understand) we shall grasp with the mind what God is, if we think of him as being that whose quality and greatness cannot be understood and cannot even come into thought itself. For if the sharpness of our eyes is dulled at the sight of the sun, so that our gaze cannot look at the orb itself, overcome by the brightness of the rays that meet it, the sharpness of the mind suffers the same in every thought of God: the more it strains to contemplate God, the more it is blinded by the very light of its thought.
For what can you fittingly say (to repeat myself) of him who is loftier than all loftiness, higher than all height, deeper than all depth, brighter than all light, clearer than all clearness, more splendid than all splendor, stronger than all strength, mightier than all might, more beautiful than all beauty, truer than all truth, braver than all bravery, greater than all majesty, more powerful than all power, richer than all riches, wiser than all wisdom, kinder than all kindness, better than all goodness, more just than all justice, more merciful than all mercy? For all kinds of excellence must necessarily be less than him who is both the God and the Father of all excellences; so that it may truly be said that God is that which is such that nothing can be compared with it. For he is above all that can be said. For he is a kind of Mind, begetting and filling all things, which, without any beginning or end of time, governs by supreme and perfect reason the causes of things, naturally linked together, for the benefit of all.
Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.
2 Pet 3:13 (allusion, low confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: God contains all things, has neither beginning nor end, and exceeds every thought and word; whatever we say of him names something of his rather than himself.
- The “God superior to him” whom “some think” exists is the higher God of Marcion and the Gnostics. “Mightier than all might” renders “omni virtute viritior”, apparently a corrupt “virtutior” or the like. Migne's reference to 2 Pet 3:13 is for the world's dissolution “to provide other and greater things”.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR: B for D; OCR: M for N; OCR: broken letter; OCR: e for o; OCR: h for b; OCR: l for t; OCR: misread letters; OCR: o for e; OCR: u for n; OCR: uncertain character; OCR: uncertain characters; editorial chapter summary (printed as a heading in ANF), not Novatian's text; removed like Migne's Argumentum in ch. 8): Deus super omnia, ipse continens omnia, immensus, aeternus, mente hominis major, sermone inexplicabilis, sublimitate omni sublimior. → ; emnium → omnium; disparihus → disparibus; c(??)agn(??)entata → coagmentata; sod dum → sed dum; merito mula est → merito muta est; aliqua(??)(??)nus → aliquatenus; sirn(??)one → sermone; do co condigne → de eo condigne; Misi quod → Nisi quod; lice(??)) → licet); super(??)tus → superatus; considerandum Beum → considerandum Deum; cogilationis → cogitationis; omui → omni; clen entia → clementia.
Topics: God
Cite (SBL): Novatian, Trin. 2 (PL 3:915b–917c; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/novatian-trinitate/2). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/novatian-trinitate/2
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-novatian-trinitate-2) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin text of Migne, PL 3 (1865 printing), corrected where the digitization is faulty; made independently of existing English translations.
Chapter 3
3PL 3:917c–919b
Hunc Igitur agnoscimus et scimus Deum, conditorem rerum omnium: Dominum, propter potestatem, et parentem propter institutionem: hunc, inquam, qui dixit, et facta sunt omnia; proecepit, et processerunt universa; de quo scriptum est: Omnia in sapientia fecisti; de quo Moyses: Deus in coelo sursum et in terra deorsum; qui, secundum Isaiam, mensus est coelum palmo, terram pugillo: qui aspicit terram, et facit eam tremere; qui continet gyrum terroe, et eos qui habitant in ipso quasi locustoe; qui expendit montes in pondere, et nemora in statera, id est certo divinae dispositionis examine: ac, ne facile in ruinam procumberet magnitudo inaequaliter jacens, si non paribus fuisset librata ponderibus, onus hoc moderanter terrenae molis aequavit. Qui dicit per prophetam: Ego Deus, et non est proeter me. Qui per eumdem prophetam refert: Quoniam majestatem meam non dabo alteri; ut omnes cum suis figmentis ethnicos excludat et haereticos, probans Deum non esse qui manu artificis factus sit, nec eum qui ingenio haeretici fictus sit. Non est enim Deus, cui, ut sit, quaerendus est artifex. Quique adhuc adjecit per prophetam: Coelum mihi thronus est, terra autem scabellum pedum meorum: qualem mihi oedificabitis domum, aut quis locus requiei meoe? ut ostendat quoniam multo magis illum templum non capit, quem mundus non capit: et haec non ad sui jactantiam, sed ad nostri scientiam refert. Neque enim ipse a nobis desiderat magnitudinis gloriam, sed nobis vult religiosam, qua pater, conferre sapientiam. Quique praeterea ferinos nostros animos, et de agresti immanitate tumidos et abruptos ad lenitatem trahere volens, dicit: Et super quem requiescet Spiritus meus, nisi super humilem et quietum, et trementem verba mea? ut Deum aliquatenus quantus sit possit agnoscere, dum illum per Spiritum collatum discit timere. Qui similiter adhuc magis in notitiam nostri volens pervenire, ad culturam sui nostros excitans animos, aiebat: Ego sum Dominus, qui feci lucem et creavi tenebras; ut vicissitudinum istarum quibus noctes diesque moderantur, non naturam, nescio quam, putaremus artificem; sed Deum agnosceremus potius (quod erat verius) conditorem. Quem quoniam obtutu oculorum videre non possumus, de operum magnitudine et virtute et majestate condiscimus: Invisibilia enim ipsius, inquit apostolus Paulus, a creatura mundi per ea quae facta sunt intellecta conspiciuntur; sempiterna quoque ejus virtus et divinitas: ut animus humanus ex manifestis occulta condiscens, de operum magnitudine quae videret, mentis oculis artificis magnitudinem cogitaret. De quo idem Apostolus: Regi autem saeculorum immortali, invisibili, soli Deo honor et gloria. Evasit enim oculorum contemplationem, qui cogitationis vicit magnitudinem: Quoniam, inquit, ex ipso et per ipsum et in ipso sunt omnia. Nam et imperio ejus omnia, ut ex ipso sint: et verbo ejus digesta, ut per ipsum sint: et in judicium ejus recidunt universa; ut dum in ipso, exspectant libertatem corruptione deposita, in ipsum videantur esse revocata.
This God, then, we acknowledge and know, the Maker of all things: Lord because of his power, and Father because of his creating. This is he, I say, who spoke and all things were made; who commanded and all things came forth; of whom it is written, “In wisdom you have made all things”; of whom Moses says, “God in heaven above and on the earth below”; who, according to Isaiah, measured the heaven with his palm and the earth with his fist; who looks on the earth and makes it tremble; who holds the circle of the earth and those who dwell in it as locusts; who weighs the mountains in a balance and the groves in scales, that is, by the sure judgment of the divine ordering; and, lest the mass, lying unevenly, should easily fall into ruin if it were not balanced with equal weights, he evened out this burden of the earthly bulk with due measure. It is he who says through the prophet, “I am God, and there is none besides me.” It is he who declares through the same prophet, “For I will not give my majesty to another”, so as to exclude all heathens and heretics together with their fabrications, proving that he is not God who has been made by the hand of an artisan, nor he who has been fashioned by the invention of a heretic. For he is not God for whose existence an artisan must be sought. And he further added through the prophet, “Heaven is my throne, and the earth the footstool of my feet: what house will you build for me, or what is the place of my rest?”, to show that a temple cannot hold him whom the world cannot hold; and he says this not to boast of himself but for our knowledge. For he does not desire from us the glory of greatness, but wishes, as a Father, to confer on us religious wisdom.
And further, wishing to draw our wild spirits, swollen and harsh with rustic savagery, to gentleness, he says, “And upon whom will my Spirit rest, but upon the humble and quiet, and him who trembles at my words?”, so that man may in some measure know how great God is, while he learns to fear him through the Spirit that is given. In the same way, wishing still more to come to our knowledge and stirring our minds to worship him, he said, “I am the Lord, who made light and created darkness”, so that we should not suppose some nature or other to be the artisan of those alternations by which nights and days are governed, but should rather acknowledge God (as was truer) as their Maker. Since we cannot see him with the gaze of our eyes, we learn of him from the greatness, power, and majesty of his works. “For his invisible things,” says the apostle Paul, “from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood through the things that have been made; his eternal power also and divinity”, so that the human mind, learning hidden things from things manifest, might from the greatness of the works it sees contemplate with the eyes of the mind the greatness of the Artisan. Of him the same apostle says, “Now to the King of the ages, immortal, invisible, the only God, be honor and glory.” For he who has surpassed the greatness of thought has escaped the gaze of the eyes. “For,” he says, “from him and through him and in him are all things.” For by his command all things exist, so that they are from him; and by his word they are ordered, so that they are through him; and all things fall back under his judgment, so that, while they wait in him for liberty, when corruption has been laid aside, they may be seen to have been called back to him.
Ps 33:9 (32:9 Vulg.) (allusion, medium confidence) · Ps 148:5 (allusion, high confidence) · Ps 104:24 (103:24 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · Deut 4:39 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 40:12 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 104:32 (103:32 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 40:22 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 45:21 (quotation, medium confidence) · Isa 42:8 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 66:1 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 66:2 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 45:7 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 1:20 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Tim 1:17 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 11:36 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 8:21 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Scripture shows God as the one Creator who measures heaven and earth, admits no rival, cannot be contained in a temple, and is known from his works though unseen.
- The quotations and allusions are Ps 33:9 and 148:5; Ps 104:24 (103:24 Vulg.); Deut 4:39; Isa 40:12; Ps 104:32 (103:32 Vulg.); Isa 40:22, 12; Isa 45:21–22 (cf. 45:5); Isa 42:8; Isa 66:1–2; Isa 45:7; Rom 1:20; 1 Tim 1:17; Rom 11:36 (Migne gives 11:33); Rom 8:21. Novatian's Latin often differs from the Vulgate (e.g. “majestatem meam” for “gloriam meam” in Isa 42:8).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR: broken word at line end; OCR: c for e; OCR: doubled letter; OCR: i for t; OCR: in for m; OCR: letter dropped; OCR: m for n; OCR: misread letters; OCR: n for m; OCR: t for r; OCR: u for n): scriiptum → scriptum; maguitudo → magnitudo; per cumdem → per eumdem; immamitate → immanitate; discit timete → discit timere; possubius → possumus; Nain et → Nam et; ut ex ipso sim → ut ex ipso sint; digesia → digesta; ut dun in → ut dum in; liberta- (??)em → libertatem.
Cite (SBL): Novatian, Trin. 3 (PL 3:917c–919b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/novatian-trinitate/3). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/novatian-trinitate/3
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-novatian-trinitate-3) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin text of Migne, PL 3 (1865 printing), corrected where the digitization is faulty; made independently of existing English translations.
Chapter 4
4PL 3:919b–921b
Quem solum merito bonum pronuntiat Dominus: cujus bonitatis totus testis est mundus, quem non instituisset, nisi bonus fuisset. Nam si omnia bona valde, consequenter ac merito et quae instituta sunt bona, bonum institutorem probaverunt: et quae a bono institutore sunt, aliud quam bona esse non possunt: ex quo omne malum facessat a Deo. Nec enim potest fieri ut sit initiator aut artifex ullius mali operis, qui nomen sibi perfecti vindicat et parentis et judicis: maxime cum omnis mali operis vindex sit et judex; quoniam et non aliunde occurrit homini malum, nisi a bono Deo recessisset. Hoc autem ipsum in homine denotatur: non quia necesse fuit, sed quia ipse sic voluit. Unde manifeste et quid malum esset apparuit, et, ne invidia in Deo esse videretur, a quo malum ortum esset, eluxit. Hic ergo semper sui est similis, nec se unquam in aliquas formas vertit aut mutat, ne per immutationem etiam mortalis esse videatur. Immutatio enim conversionis, portio cujusdam comprehenditur mortis. Ideo nec adjectio in illo unquam ullius aut partis aut honoris accedit, ne quid unquam perfecto defuisse videatur: nec detrimentum in eo aliquod agitur, ne gradus mortalitatis receptus esse videatur: sed quod est, id semper est; et qui est, semper ipse est; et qualis est, semper talis est. Nam et incrementa originem monstrant, et detrimenta mortem atque interitum probant, et ideo: Ego, ait, sum Deus, et non sum mutatus, statum suum tenens semper, dum id quod natum non est, converti non potest. Hoc enim in ipso quidquid illud potest quod est Deus, semper sit necesse est; ut semper sit Deus, servans sese virtutibus suis. Et ideo dicit: Ego sum qui sum. Quod enim est, ideo hoc habet nomen, quoniam eamdem semper sui obtinet qualitatem. Immutatio enim tollit illud nomen quod est: quidquid enim aliquando vertitur, mortale ostenditur, hoc ipso quod convertitur. Desinit enim esse quod fuerat, et incipit consequenter esse quod non erat: idcirco et merito in Deo manet semper status suus, dum, sine detrimento commutationis, semper sui et similis et aequalis est. Quod enim natum non est, nec mutari potest: ea enim sola in conversionem veniunt, quaecunque fiunt vel quaecunque gignuntur; dum quae aliquando non fuerant, discunt esse nascendo, atque ideo nascendo converti. At enim illa quae nec nativitatem habent nec artificem, excluserunt a se demutationem, dum in qua conversionis causa est, non habent originem: ideo et unus pronuntiatus est, dum parem non habet: Deus enim, quidquid esse potest Deus est, summum sit necesse est. Summum autem quidquid est, ita demum summum esse oportet, dum extra comparem est. Et ideo solum et unum sit necesse est, cui conferri nihil potest, dum parem non habet. Quoniam nec duo infinita esse possunt, ut rerum dictat ipsa natura. Infinitum est autem, quidquid nec originem habet omnino, nec finem. Excludit enim alterius initium, quidquid occupaverit totum. Quoniam si non omne id quod est, quidquid est continet; dum intra id invenitur quo continetur, minus inventum eo quo continetur, Deus esse desierit, in alterius potestatem redactus, cujus magnitudine, qua minor, fuerit inclusus: et ideo quod continuit, Deus potius esse jam coeperit. Ex quo effectum est ut nec nomen Dei proprium possit edici, quoniam non possit nec concipi. Id enim nomine continetur, quidquid etiam ex naturae suae conditione comprehenditur. Nomen enim significantia est ejus rei, quae comprehendi potuit ex nomine. At quando id de quo agitur tale est, ut condigne nec ipsis intellectibus colligatur; quomodo appellationis digne vocabulo pronuntiabitur, quod dum extra intellectum est, etiam supra appellationis significantiam sit necesse est? Ut merito quando nomen suum Deus, ex quibusdam rationibus et occasionibus adjicit et praefert, non tam legitimam proprietatem appellationis sciamus esse depromptam, quam significantiam quamdam constitutam; ad quam dum homines decurrunt, Dei misericordiam per ipsam impetrare posse videantur. Est ergo et immortalis et incorruptibilis, nec detrimenta sentiens omnino, nec finem. Nam et quia incorruptibilis, ideo et immortalis; et quia immortalis, utique et incorruptibilis; utroque invicem sibi et in se connexione mutua perplexo, et ad statum aeternitatis vicaria concatenatione producto, et immortalitate de incorruptione descendente, et incorruptione de immortalitate veniente.
He is the one whom the Lord rightly declares alone to be good; to whose goodness the whole world is witness, which he would not have established had he not been good. For if all things are very good, then consequently and rightly the things established, being good, have proved their Establisher good; and things that come from a good Establisher cannot be other than good. Hence let all evil be far from God. For it cannot be that he should be the originator or the artisan of any evil work who claims for himself the name of the perfect one, of Father and of Judge, especially since he is the avenger and judge of every evil work; for evil does not befall man from any other source than his having departed from the good God. And this is marked in man himself: not because it was necessary, but because he himself so willed. From this it has plainly appeared both what evil is, and it has shone out clearly, so that envy should not seem to be in God, from whom evil would then have arisen.
This God, then, is always like himself; he never turns or changes himself into any forms, lest by change he should seem to be mortal as well. For the change of alteration is understood to be a portion of a kind of death. Therefore no addition of any part or honor ever comes to him, lest anything should ever seem to have been lacking to the perfect one; nor is any loss incurred in him, lest he should seem to have taken on a step toward mortality. But what he is, he always is; and who he is, he himself always is; and of what kind he is, of that kind he always is. For increases show an origin, and losses prove death and destruction. And therefore he says, “I am God, and I have not changed”, always keeping his condition, since what is unborn cannot be changed. For whatever that is in him which is God must always exist, so that he may always be God, preserving himself by his own powers. And therefore he says, “I am who I am.” For what is has this name because it always keeps the same quality of itself. For change takes away that name “is”: for whatever is at some time changed is shown to be mortal by the very fact that it is changed. For it ceases to be what it had been, and consequently begins to be what it was not. Therefore his condition rightly remains always in God, since, without the loss of alteration, he is always both like and equal to himself. For what is not born cannot be changed either: only those things come into change which are made or begotten, since things that once were not learn to be by being born, and therefore by being born to be changed. But those things that have neither birth nor maker have shut out change from themselves, since they do not have an origin, in which lies the cause of change.
Therefore he is also declared to be one, since he has no equal. For God, whatever God can be, must be supreme. But whatever is supreme must be supreme precisely because it is beyond compare. And therefore he must be alone and one, to whom nothing can be compared, since he has no equal. For there cannot be two infinite beings, as the very nature of things dictates. And whatever has neither origin at all nor end is infinite. For whatever has taken up the whole excludes the beginning of another. For if it did not contain all that is, whatever it is, then, being found within that by which it is contained, and so found less than that by which it is contained, it would cease to be God, brought under the power of another by whose greatness, as the lesser, it had been enclosed; and so what contained it would rather have begun to be God. From this it follows that no proper name of God can be spoken, since he cannot even be conceived. For what is contained in a name is whatever is grasped from the condition of its nature. For a name is the meaning of that thing which could be grasped from the name. But when the one we are speaking of is such that he cannot fittingly be gathered up even by the understanding itself, how will he be worthily pronounced by the word of a name, since, being beyond understanding, he must also be above the meaning of a name? So when God, for certain reasons and occasions, adds and puts forward his name, we should know that it is not so much a proper appellation that has been expressed, as a certain meaning that has been set, to which men may have recourse and so be able to obtain God's mercy by it.
He is therefore both immortal and incorruptible, experiencing no loss at all, and no end. For because he is incorruptible, he is therefore immortal; and because he is immortal, he is surely incorruptible: each is entwined with the other in mutual connection, and carried forward to the state of eternity in alternating linkage, immortality coming down from incorruption and incorruption coming from immortality.
Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.
Luke 18:19 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 1:31 (quotation, high confidence) · Jas 1:17 (allusion, low confidence) · Mal 3:6 (quotation, high confidence) · Exod 3:14 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: God alone is good, so evil comes not from him but from man's free turning away; he is unchanging, one, infinite, beyond any proper name, immortal and incorruptible.
- The quotations and allusions are Luke 18:19 (Mark 10:18); Gen 1:31; Mal 3:6; Exod 3:14; Migne adds Jas 1:17. “For God, whatever God can be, must be supreme” renders a sentence whose Latin (“Deus enim, quidquid esse potest Deus est, summum sit necesse est”) is garbled in the edition; the sense is clear. “Is at some time changed” reads “vertitur” for the edition's “venitur” (see corrections).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR: a for n; OCR: c for e; OCR: l for t; OCR: misread ending (the clause requires the subjunctive singular); OCR: misread letters (sense requires 'is changed'); OCR: uncertain character): esse videntur: sed → esse videatur: sed; mons(??)rant → monstrant; oblinet → obtinet; aliquando venitur → aliquando vertitur; id dc quo → id de quo; pronuatiabitur → pronuntiabitur.
Topics: God, Evil and its origin
Cite (SBL): Novatian, Trin. 4 (PL 3:919b–921b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/novatian-trinitate/4). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/novatian-trinitate/4
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-novatian-trinitate-4) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin text of Migne, PL 3 (1865 printing), corrected where the digitization is faulty; made independently of existing English translations.
Chapter 5
5PL 3:921b–922a
Cujus etiam si iracundias legimus, et indignationes quasdam descriptas tenemus, et odia relata cognoscimus, non tamen haec intelligimus ad humanorum relata esse exempla vitiorum. Haec enim omnia, etsi hominem possunt corrumpere, divinam vim non possunt omnino vitiare. Passiones enim istae in hominibus merito esse dicentur, in Deo non merito judicabuntur. Corrumpi enim per haec homo potest, quia corrumpi potest: corrumpi per haec Deus non potest, quia nec corrumpi potest. Habent igitur ista vim suam quam exerceant; sed ubi praecedit passibilis materia, non ubi praecedit impassibilis substantia. Nam et quod irascitur Deus, non ex vitio ejus venit, sed ad remedium nostri illud facit. Indulgens est enim, etiam tunc cum minatur: dum per haec homines ad recta revocantur. Nam quibus ad honestam vitam deest ratio, metus est necessarius, ut qui rationem reliquerunt, vel terrore moveantur. Et ideo omnes istae vel iracundiae Dei, vel odia, vel quaecunque sunt hujusmodi, dum ad medicinam nostram proferuntur (ut res docet), ex consilio, non ex vitio venerunt, nec ex fragilitate descendunt; propter quod etiam ad corrumpendum Deum valere non possunt. Materiarum enim in nobis ex quibus sumus, diversitas ad iracundiae consuevit corrumpentem nos excitare discordiam; quae in Deo vel ex natura vel ex vitio non potest esse: dum non utique ex coagmentis corporalibus intelligitur esse constructus. Est enim simplex, et sine ulla corporea concretione, quidquid illud est totus, quod se solus scit esse; quandoquidem Spiritus sit dictus. Et ideo haec quae in hominibus vitiosa sunt et corrumpentia, dum ex corporis ipsius et materiae corruptibilitate irascuntur, in Deo corruptibilitatis vim exercere non possunt: quandoquidem, ut diximus, non ex vitio, sed ratione venerunt.
Even if we read of his wrath, and have certain indignations of his described, and know of hatreds reported of him, we do not understand these to have been reported after the pattern of human vices. For all these things, though they can corrupt man, cannot in any way impair the divine power. Such passions will rightly be said to be in men, but will not rightly be judged to be in God. For man can be corrupted by them, because he can be corrupted; God cannot be corrupted by them, because he cannot be corrupted at all. These things, then, have their own force to exert, but where passible matter is present, not where impassible substance is present. For the fact that God is angry does not come from any fault in him; he does it for our healing. For he is merciful even when he threatens, since by these things men are called back to what is right. For those who lack reason for an honorable life need fear, so that those who have abandoned reason may at least be moved by terror. And therefore all these wraths of God, or hatreds, or whatever else is of this kind, since they are put forward for our healing (as the facts show), have come from design, not from fault, and do not come down from weakness; and for that reason they can have no power to corrupt God. For the diversity of the materials of which we are made commonly stirs up in us the discord of anger, which corrupts us; this cannot be in God, either from nature or from fault, since he is certainly not understood to be built up from bodily parts joined together. For he is simple, and without any bodily compounding; whatever that is which he alone knows himself to be, he is wholly that, since he has been called Spirit. And therefore those things which in men are faulty and corrupting, since men are angered through the corruptibility of the body itself and of matter, cannot exert the force of corruptibility in God, since, as we have said, they have come not from fault but from reason.
John 4:24 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: When Scripture speaks of God's anger or hatred, it does not mean human passions: God, simple and incorruptible Spirit, threatens only to heal and correct us.
- The allusion is John 4:24 (“God is Spirit”).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR: letter lost; OCR: misread ending; OCR: o for e; OCR: t for r; OCR: u for n; OCR: uncertain character; OCR: word divided at a line end): indiguationes → indignationes; noc ex → nec ex; ad corrumpentium Deum → ad corrumpendum Deum; cor. rumpentem → corrumpentem; es e constructus → esse constructus; ma(??)eriae → materiae; exercete → exercere.
Topics: God
Cite (SBL): Novatian, Trin. 5 (PL 3:921b–922a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/novatian-trinitate/5). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/novatian-trinitate/5
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-novatian-trinitate-5) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin text of Migne, PL 3 (1865 printing), corrected where the digitization is faulty; made independently of existing English translations.
Chapter 6
6PL 3:922a–924a
Et licet Scriptura coelestis ad humanam formam faciem divinam saepe convertat, dum dicit: Oculi Domini super justos: aut dum: Odoratus est Dominus Deus odorem bonae fragrantiae: aut dum traduntur Moysi tabulae scriptae digito Dei: aut dum populus filiorum Israel de terra AEgypti manu valida et brachio excelso liberatur: aut dum dicit: Os enim Domini locutum est haec: aut dum terra scabellum pedum Dei esse perhibetur: aut dum dicit: Inclina aurem tuam, et audi: nos qui dicimus, quia Lex spiritalis est, non intra haec nostri corporis lineamenta, modum aut figuram divinae majestatis includimus, sed suis illam interminatae magnitudinis (ut ita dixerim) campis sine ullo fine diffundimus. Scriptum est enim: Si ascendero in coelum, tu ibi es: si descendero ad inferos, ades: et si assumpsero alas meas, et abiero trans mare, ibi manus tua apprehendet me, et dextera tua detinebit me. Rationem enim divinae Scripturae de temperamento dispositionis cognoscimus. Parabolis enim adhuc, secundum fidei tempus, de Deo Prophetes tunc loquebatur, non quomodo Deus erat, sed quomodo populus capere poterat. Ut igitur haec sic de Deo dicantur, non Deo, sed populo potius imputetur. Sic et tabernaculum erigere populo permittitur; nec tamen Deus intra tabernaculum clusus continetur; sic et templum exstruitur; nec tamen Deus intra templi angustias omnino sepitur. Non igitur mediocris est Deus, sed populi mediocris est sensus: nec angustus Deus, sed rationis populi angustus est intellectus habitus. Denique In Evangelio: Veniet hora, Dominus aiebat, cum neque in monte isto, neque in Hierusalem adorabitis Patrem, et causas reddidit dicens; Spiritus est Deus; et eos ergo qui adorant, in spiritu et veritate adorare oportet. Efficaciae igitur ibi divinae per membra monstrantur: non habitus Dei, nec corporalia lineamenta ponuntur. Nam et cum oculi describuntur, quod omnia videat exprimitur; et quando auris, quod omnia audiat proponitur; et cum digitus, significantia quaedam voluntatis aperitur; et cum nares, precum quasi odorum perceptio ostenditur; et cum manus, quod creaturae sit omnis auctor probatur; et quando brachium, quod nulla natura contra robur ipsius repugnare possit edicitur; et quando pedes, quod impleat omnia, nec sit quidquam ubi non sit Deus, explicatur. Neque enim sunt ei aut membra aut membrorum officia necessaria, ad cujus solum etiam tacitum arbitrium et serviunt et adsunt omnia. Cur enim requirat oculos, qui Lux est? aut cur quaerat pedes, qui ubique est? aut cur ingredi velit, cum non sit quo extra se progredi possit? aut cur manus expetat, cujus ad omnia instituenda artifex est et silens voluntas? Nec auribus eget, qui etiam tacitas novit voluntates. Aut propter quam causam linguam quaerat, cui cogitare jussisse est? Necessaria enim haec membra hominibus fuerunt, non Deo: quia inefficax hominis consilium fuisset, nisi cogitamen corpus implesset; Deo autem non necessaria, cujus voluntatem non tantum sine aliqua molitione opera subsequuntur, sed ipsa statim opera cum voluntate procedunt. Caeterum ipse totus oculus, quia totus videt; et totus auris, quia totus audit; et totus manus, quia totus operatur; et totus pes, quia totus ubique est. Idem enim quidquid illud est, totus aequalis est, et totus ubique est. Non enim habet in se diversitatem sui, quidquid est simplex. Ea enim demum in diversitatem membrorum recidunt, quae veniunt ex nativitate in dissolutionem. Sed haec quae concreta non sunt, sentire non possunt. Quod enim immortale est, quidquid est, illud ipsum unum et simplex et semper est. Et ideo quia unum est, dissolvi non potest; quoniam quidquid est illud ipsum extra jus dissolutionis positum, legibus est mortis solutum.
And although the heavenly Scripture often turns the divine countenance into a human form, when it says, “The eyes of the Lord are upon the righteous”; or when it says, “The Lord God smelled an odor of sweet fragrance”; or when tablets written by the finger of God are handed to Moses; or when the people of the children of Israel are set free from the land of Egypt by a strong hand and a lofty arm; or when it says, “For the mouth of the Lord has spoken these things”; or when the earth is said to be the footstool of God's feet; or when it says, “Incline your ear and hear”: we who say that the Law is spiritual do not enclose the measure or shape of the divine majesty within these outlines of our body, but spread it out without any limit over the plains (so to speak) of its boundless greatness. For it is written: “If I go up into heaven, you are there; if I go down to the underworld, you are present; and if I take my wings and go away across the sea, there your hand will lay hold of me and your right hand will hold me fast.” For we recognize the reasoning of divine Scripture from the adjustment of its arrangement. For the prophet then still spoke of God in parables, suited to the stage of faith at that time, not as God was, but as the people were able to grasp. That these things are said of God in this way, then, is to be charged not to God but rather to the people. So too the people are permitted to set up a tabernacle, and yet God is not shut up and contained within the tabernacle; so too a temple is built, and yet God is by no means fenced in within the narrow bounds of a temple. It is not God, then, who is limited, but the understanding of the people that is limited; not God who is narrow, but the understanding of the people's reason that is narrow.
Finally, in the Gospel the Lord said, “The hour will come when you will worship the Father neither on this mountain nor in Jerusalem”; and he gave the reason, saying, “God is Spirit; and therefore those who worship him must worship in spirit and in truth.” There, then, it is the workings of God that are shown by the members, not the outward form of God or bodily outlines that are set out. For when eyes are described, it is expressed that he sees all things; and when an ear, it is put forward that he hears all things; and when a finger, a certain meaning of his will is disclosed; and when nostrils, his perception of prayers as though of fragrances is shown; and when a hand, it is proved that he is the author of every creature; and when an arm, it is declared that no nature can resist his strength; and when feet, it is explained that he fills all things and that there is nothing where God is not. For neither members nor the functions of members are necessary to him at whose will alone, even unspoken, all things both serve and are present. For why should he require eyes, who is Light? Or why should he seek feet, who is everywhere? Or why should he wish to walk, when there is nowhere outside himself to which he could go? Or why should he want hands, whose silent will is the artisan for establishing all things? Nor does he need ears, who knows even unspoken wishes. Or for what reason should he seek a tongue, for whom to think is to command? These members were necessary to men, not to God, because man's purpose would have been ineffective had the body not carried out his thought; but to God they are not necessary, since works not only follow his will without any effort, but the works themselves come forth at once together with the will. Rather, he is himself wholly eye, because he wholly sees; wholly ear, because he wholly hears; wholly hand, because he wholly works; and wholly foot, because he is wholly everywhere. For whatever he is, he is wholly equal and wholly everywhere. For whatever is simple has no diversity of itself within itself. For only those things fall into a diversity of members which come by birth into dissolution. But things that are not compounded cannot suffer this. For what is immortal, whatever it is, is itself one and simple and eternal. And therefore, because it is one, it cannot be dissolved; since whatever is itself placed beyond the rule of dissolution is freed from the laws of death.
Ps 34:15 (33:16 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 8:21 (quotation, high confidence) · Exod 31:18 (allusion, high confidence) · Ps 136:12 (135:12 Vulg.) (allusion, high confidence) · Isa 1:20 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 66:1 (allusion, high confidence) · 2 Kgs 19:16 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 7:14 (allusion, high confidence) · Ps 139:8 (138:8 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · Exod 26:1 (allusion, medium confidence) · 1 Kgs 6:1 (allusion, medium confidence) · John 4:21 (quotation, high confidence) · John 4:24 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Scripture speaks of God's eyes, hands, and feet to suit the people's understanding; these describe his workings, for God is Spirit, simple, everywhere, and needs no members.
- The quotations and allusions are Ps 34:15 (33:16 Vulg.); Gen 8:21; Exod 31:18; Ps 136:12 (135:12 Vulg.; cf. Deut 5:15); Isa 1:20; Isa 66:1; 2 Kgs 19:16; Rom 7:14; Ps 139:8–10 (138:8–10 Vulg.); John 4:21, 24; and the tabernacle and temple (Exod 26; 1 Kgs 6). The prophet spoke “in parables, suited to the stage of faith at that time”: Novatian's principle of accommodation, that God adapts revelation to the capacity of its hearers.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's inline Scripture reference; Migne's inline Scripture reference (Exod 26); OCR: a for e; OCR: a for u; OCR: broken letter; OCR: c for e; OCR: l for f; OCR: l for t; OCR: letter dropped; OCR: li for h; OCR: misread letters; OCR: misread word; OCR: n for u; OCR: split word; OCR: stray dot and space; OCR: stray letter; OCR: t for l; OCR: uncertain character; OCR: uncertain characters; OCR: word divided at a line end; doubled colon): ant dum → aut dum; dicit:: Inclina → dicit: Inclina; intermi— natae → interminatae; sine ullo line → sine ullo fine; in ibi es → tu ibi es; quiomodo → quomodo; implitetur → imputetur; Sic (Exod. XXVI) et → Sic et; sic (III Reg. IV) et → sic et; medio eris → mediocris; Evangclio → Evangelio; aie(??)at → aiebat; Hierusatem → Hierusalem; sig(??)(??)ficantia → significantia; bracilium → brachium; posit edicitur → possit edicitur; nec sil quidquam → nec sit quidquam; ubi· que → ubique; jussissc → jussisse; moli ione → molitione; Non caim → Non enim; Ea cuim → Ea enim; racidunt → recidunt; anum et simplex → unum et simplex.
Topics: Scripture and canon, God, Interpreting Scripture
Cite (SBL): Novatian, Trin. 6 (PL 3:922a–924a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/novatian-trinitate/6). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/novatian-trinitate/6
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-novatian-trinitate-6) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin text of Migne, PL 3 (1865 printing), corrected where the digitization is faulty; made independently of existing English translations.
Chapter 7
7PL 3:924a–925a
Sed illud quod dicit Dominus Spiritum Deum, puto ego sic locutum Christum de Patre, ut adhuc aliquid plus intelligi velit quam Spiritum Deum, Hominibus enim licet in Evangelio suo intelligendi incrementa faciens disputet; sed tamen et ipse sic adhuc de Deo loquitur hominibus, quomodo possunt adhuc audire vel capere; licet, ut diximus, in agnitionem Dei religiosa jam facere incrementa nitatur. Invenimus enim scriptum esse quod Deus Charitas dictus sit; nec ex hoc tamen Dei substantia Charitas expressa est: et quod Lux dictus est; nec tamen in hoc substantia Dei est, sed totum hoc de Deo dictum est quantum dici potest; ut merito et quando Spiritus dictus est, non omne id quod est, dictus sit: sed ut dum mens hominum intelligendo usque ad ipsum proficit Spiritum, conversa jam ipsa in spiritu, aliud quid amplius per Spiritum conjicere Deum esse possit. Id enim quod est, secundum id quod est, nec humano sermone edici, nec humanis auribus percipi, nec humanis sensibus colligi potest. Nam si quae praeparavit Deus his qui diligunt illum, nec oculus vidit, nec auris audivit, nec cor hominis, aut mens ipsa percepit; qualis et quantus est ille ipse qui haec repromittit, ad quae intelligenda et mens hominis et natura defecit? Denique si acceperis Spiritum substantiam Dei, creaturam feceris Deum. Omnis enim spiritus creatura est. Erit ergo jam factus Deus. Quomodo et si secundum Moysen Ignem acceperis Deum, creaturam illum esse dicendo, institutum expresseris, non institutorem docueris. Sed haec figurantur potius quam ita sunt. Nam et in Veteri Testamento ideo Deus Ignis dicitur, ut peccatori populo metus incutiatur, dum judex ostenditur. Et in Novo Testamento Spiritus esse profertur, ut refector et creator in delictis suis mortuorum, per hanc bonitatem collatae credentibus indulgentiae, comprobetur.
But as for the Lord's saying that God is Spirit, I think that Christ spoke thus of the Father meaning that something still more should be understood than that God is Spirit. For although in his Gospel he reasons with men so as to increase their understanding, yet he too still speaks of God to men in such a way as they are still able to hear or grasp, although, as we have said, he strives to make them advance devoutly in the knowledge of God. For we find it written that God has been called Love; yet the substance of God is not expressed by this as Love. And that he has been called Light; yet the substance of God is not in this either; but all this has been said of God so far as it can be said. So that rightly, when he has been called Spirit, he has not been called all that he is; but when the mind of man, by understanding, has advanced as far as Spirit itself, having itself now been turned into spirit, it may be able to infer through the Spirit that God is something still greater. For that which he is, as he is, can neither be spoken by human speech, nor perceived by human ears, nor gathered by human senses. For if the things that God has prepared for those who love him neither eye has seen, nor ear heard, nor the heart of man or the mind itself perceived, of what kind and how great is he who promises these things, to understand which both the mind and the nature of man have failed?
Finally, if you take Spirit as the substance of God, you will have made God a creature. For every spirit is a creature. God, then, will now have been made. Just so, if according to Moses you take God to be Fire, by calling him a creature you will have described something established, and will not have taught of the Establisher. But these things are figurative expressions rather than what he actually is. For in the Old Testament God is called Fire so that fear may be struck into a sinful people, since he is shown as Judge. And in the New Testament he is declared to be Spirit, so that he may be proved to be the restorer and creator of those dead in their sins, through this goodness of the pardon bestowed on believers.
John 4:24 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 John 4:8 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 John 1:5 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 2:9 (quotation, high confidence) · Deut 4:24 (allusion, high confidence) · Eph 2:5 (allusion, low confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Calling God “Spirit,” “Love,” “Light,” or “Fire” does not define his substance; these are figures that lead the mind beyond them to a God greater than all.
- The quotations and allusions are John 4:24; 1 John 4:8; 1 John 1:5; 1 Cor 2:9 (cf. Isa 64:4); Deut 4:24 (cf. Heb 12:29); Eph 2:1, 5. “Every spirit is a creature”: here “spirit” means a created spiritual being; Novatian does not deny that God is Spirit, but that the word defines his substance.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR: e for o; OCR: i for t; split word; OCR: l for t; OCR: misread letter and word divided at a line end; OCR: o for e; OCR: stray dot; OCR: stray mark in a word; OCR: uncertain character; OCR: uncertain characters; OCR: words run together): inlelligi velit → intelligi velit; sicadhuc → sic adhuc; Vei ca. pere → vel capere; dic(??)s → dictus; lotum hoc → totum hoc; merite et → merito et; intelligondo → intelligendo; Spiri” tum → Spiritum; inlelligenda → intelligenda; nat(??)ra → natura; Deum·. → Deum.; esi. Erit er go → est. Erit ergo.
Topics: God
Cite (SBL): Novatian, Trin. 7 (PL 3:924a–925a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/novatian-trinitate/7). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/novatian-trinitate/7
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-novatian-trinitate-7) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin text of Migne, PL 3 (1865 printing), corrected where the digitization is faulty; made independently of existing English translations.