Homilies of Maximus of Turin (Bruni's collection) 83.1–86.1
Authorship disputed: Bruni's 1784 collection as printed in Migne; modern scholarship (Mutzenbecher, CCSL 23, 1962) judges a number of these pieces to be by other authors. The individual pieces are not yet sorted on this site.
Latin text: Migne, PL 57 (Latin text: Migne, Patrologia Latina, digitized by Open Greek and Latin (patrologia_latina-dev, University of Leipzig), CC BY-SA 4.0).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0).
Chapter 83
83.1PL 57:433a–439a
Cum apud patres nostros, sicut liber Judicum refert, quaedam Israeliticæ tribus civili adversum se prælio decertarent, nec propter consimilem populi unius habitum inter bellantes posset esse discretio, tribus illa cujus justior erat causa pugnandi, quia merito per Dei auxilium victoriam præsumebat, signum sibi certo in sermone constituit, ut quos una armorum facies confundebat, secretioris verbi distingueret sacramentum. Quod beati apostoli, ut ego reor, exemplum sequentes Ecclesiæ Dei, quam ad- versum militiam diabolici furoris armabant, mysterium symboli tradiderunt; ut, quia sub uno Christi nomine credentium erat futura diversitas, signaculum symboli inter fideles perfidosque secerneret, et alienus a fide atque hostis appareret Ecclesiæ, aut tanquam baptizatus nescisset, aut tanquam hæreticus corrupisset. Credis, inquit, in Deum, Patrem omnipotentem. Credendus sine dubio est Deus, Pater omnipotens, cujus sic virtus sentitur, ut quantitas ejus et qualitas ignoretur : esse enim illius et posse non discutiendo assequimur, sed credendo. Quem autem credere debeamus edocet nos Redemptoris nostri auctoritas, dicentis : Qui credit in me et in eum qui me misit, habet vitam æternam (Joan. v); et alibi: Creditis in Deum, et in me credite (Joan. xiv. Plus est, fratres, quod fidei oculis intuemur, quam sensus possit videre carnalis. Credis, inquit, in Deum, Patrem omnipotentem. In Deo natura innascibilis, in Patre Unigeniti veritas, in Omnipotente plenitudo virtutis ostenditur. Est namque per ingenitam deitatem omnipotens, et per omnipotentiam Pater; nec disquirendum qualiter sit Pater; quia qualiter Deus sit aut omnipotens non potest comprehendi. Et in Jesum Christum, Filium ejus unicum, Dominum nostrum. Quod Christus est factus, qui Filius erat, dispensatio est redemptionis humanæ; quod Dominus est, de proprietate naturæ est; unicus autem, vel Unigenitus annuntiatur et creditur, quia unus ita est genitus, nec habet in nativitate consortem. Filium audis, non ut illum sexu aliquo editum putes, sed ut credas incomprehensibili majestate Deum prodiisse de Deo, ut ipse ait: Ego a Patre exivi, et veni in hunc mundum (Joan. XVI). Qui natus est de Spiritu sancto ex Maria virgine. Spiritum sanctum audis, ut partum illum mirabilem simul et inculpabilem recognoscas. Cæleste est enim quod Spiritus agit, inviolatum quod sanctus operatur. Nam cum Unigenitum Dei fieri hominem redemptionis nostræ necessitas flagitaret, hoc nativitati suæ privilegium propriæ divinitatis invexit, ut de virgine nasceretur. Qui enim veniebat inveteratam peccatis hominum revocare naturam, novam legem voluit habere nascendi. Unigenitus igitur Dei factus est filius hominis, ut qui Creator mundi erat fieret et Redemptor. Qui sub Pontio Pilato crucifixus est et sepultus. Nulla nobis sit de Christi cruce confusio, quia habemus de ejus passione victoriam : sicut enim sempiternus Dei Filius non sibi, sed nobis est natus; ita immaculatus Dei Agnus non sibi, sed nobis est passus. Quis autem non mirificum advertat esse mysterium, ubi ipse homo prædicatur, qui Deus est; et ubi idem Dominus annuntiatur, qui asseritur crucifixus? nec incogitata ei, quod perem- ptus est, aut improvisa res accidit, qui divinitatis suæ consilio idcirco suscepit hominem, ut pro homine posset occidi. Supplicium autem crucis elegit, ut sublimiorem victoriam pareret pœna deterior; et qui pro universitatis bono patiebatur, quasi in conspectu mundi in altum sublevatus occumberet, simul ut qui crucifixum videbant, mirabilia cernerent crucifixi. Nam satis abundeque gloriam patientis ostendunt repentina solis obscuritas, tremor terrarum, saxorum divisio, resurrectio mortuorum. Illud autem quanti est testimonii, quod etiam pariter crucifixus latro memoriam sui in coelesti regno fieri a consorte supplicii precabatur? Hinc est, carissimi, quod illusiones et probra quæ pertulit Christus, crucem mortemque ejus non suspiriis ingemiscimus, sed continuis laudibus celebramus. Sepultus est autem, quia consequens erat ut qui mortuus fuerat acciperet sepulturam. Sepultus est Dominus ut ad consolationem sepultorum benedictionem corporis ejus et terra susciperet. Sepultus est ut qui vere mortuus cernebatur, vere rediisse a mortuis crederetur. Tertia, inquit, die resurrexit a mortuis. Si credidisti de Christo quod dedecoris est, crede quod gloriæ est: si credidisti quod mortis est, crede quod vitæ est. Sicut enim in passione mysterium pietatis est, ita in resurrectione operatio potestatis, ut ait ipse : Potestatem habeo ponendi animam meam, et potestatem habeo iterum sumendi eam (Joan. x). Quomodo itaque non illi suppetebat vita post mortem, cui mori non fuit conditio, sed potestas? Nec magnum sane est, si dicamus : Potuit Christus resurgere, cum impossibile fuerit ut auctor vitæ non rediret ad vitam; aut quomodo poterat inferni legibus detineri qui idcirco est mortuus ut mors amitteret potestatem? Nihil ergo ultra de ejus passionibus confundamur, nihil de ejus morte trepidemus, cui et resurgendi potestas erat, et natura vivendi. Cujus autem dementiæ est illum non credere resurrexisse, ad cujus praeceptum de tumulo sepultus emersit ? Ascendit in coelum. Decebat, fratres, talis gloria hominem qui de virgine nascebatur; nec impossibile ei fuit coelum ascendere, cui possibile fuit inferos triumphare. Et necesse erat ut qui ad mortem de regno venerat, post mortem rediret ad regnum. Fuit in hoc, carissimi, salutaris et incomprehensa mentibus humanis inter coelum terramque communio : et sicut terra Dei Filium se suscepisse lætata est, ita cælum Filium hominis se accepisse gauderet, ut cantatum est per prophetam : Lætentur cœli et exsultet terra (Psal. XCV). Nam sicut manifestum est terram exsultare de Deo, ita dubium non est coelum gaudere de homine Sedet ad dexteram Patris. Quod sedet Christus, victoris munus est : quod ad dexteram Patris sedet, Divinitatis est privilegium et indiscretæ consortium caritatis. Et bene ad dexteram Patris annuntiatur sedere, in quo nihil voluntatis suæ diabolus, qui totus est sinister, invenit. Inde venturus judicare vivos et mortuos. Necesse est, fratres, ut hominum genus ille discutiat qui creavit, et ipse judicet qui redemit : justumque est ut omnipotens Dominus mortales suos, quos divinitatis virtute formavit, Patris pietate salvavit, judicis examinatione discernat. Nam quid esse potest æquius apud Deum, quam ut quorum in sæculo fuit vita diversa, eorum post hoc sæculum merita distinguantur? Vivi autem judicandi referuntur ac mortui ut omnium hominum esse apud Deum cura credatur. Et in Spiritum sanctum. Hæc est, carissimi, inoffensa regula veritatis, ut quorum unum nomen est, non sit eorum diversa confessio, et qui in coelo apud se unum sunt, a nobis non separentur in terris. Nam sicut Divinitati nihil de creaturis æquari potest, ita omnem divisionem et inæqualitatem natura Divinitatis excludit. Secundum enim evangelicam veritatem, sicut Filius a Patre exivit, ita et Spiritus a Patre procedit; et Unigenitus, sicut Filius Dei est, ita et Spiritus sanctus Dei est; et sicut Pater cui vult miseretur, et filius cui vult Patrem revelat, ita etiam Spiritus et inspirare legitur prout vult, et dona cœlestium gratiarum dividere prout vult. Quomodo ergo non unum esse cum Patre Filioque credendus est Spiritus, cui æque adjacet posse quod vult? Sanctam Ecclesiam. Vere sancta est Ecclesia confitenda, per quam et sanctificatio est data mortalibus et, crescente credentium numero, omnium pene linguis in Dei laudes sanctior mundus exsultat. Sancta est Ecclesia, quæ, baptismi sacramento peccatorum contagione detersa, terrarum incolas transmittit ad cœlum. Remissionem peccatorum. Credenda est præcipue, fratres, peccatorum remissio, quia hoc unum est remedium quod hominum genus a sententia perpetuæ mortis absolvit. Idcirco Unigenitus Altissimi sumere dignatus est carnem, complexus est crucem, ut te, qui crimina tua eradere et peccata non poteras, indulgentia faceret innocentem. Ideo immaculatus occisus est Agnus ut ejus cruore humani generis macula tergeretur. Videte, fratres, profunditatem mysterii, videte altitudinem sacramenti : ubi mors reddidit vitam, et peccantium sordes sanguine sunt innocentis ablutæ. Hæc autem remissio non te ad peccatum nutrit, sed admonet ut peccare jam metuas, qui te intelligis sine venia non potuisse salvari. Bonitas enim Dei indulgentiæ suae munere non nos armat ad culpam, sed abluit ad gloriam. Carnis resurrectionem. Hic religionis nostræ finis, hæc summa credendi est. Et revera quis credens Deo possit de resurrectione dubitare, cum manifestum sit hanc solam Christo causam fuisse nascendi? Quæ enim alia ratio, quæve utilitas erat, ut Perpetuus carnem dignaretur assumere, nisi carnem perpetuitate donaret quæ gloria esset, Dei Filium crucem non refugere, mortem expetere, perpeti sepulturam, nisi vitam mortalibus præstita resurrectione conferret? Posse autem hoc fieri facit Divinitas fidem, cui totum quod vult posse subsistit. Denique, ut indubitata resurgendi exempla capiamus, ipse hic mundus, amissa receptaque decoris sui specie, et occidit et resurgit. Documentum nimirum futuræ resurrectionis accipimus, cum commendata sulcis frumenta in stipulam suam redeunt, et renovatis frondibus spoliata gelu nemora reviviscunt; cuncta etiam quae terra producit aut semine aut radice multiplicata redduntur. Quae autem duritia cordis est non credere reformari hominem, cum ea quae facta sunt reparentur. Hoc est carissimi, symbolum, cujus veritas unumquemque credentem efficit Christianum ; hoc est symbolum, quod et viventes sanctificat, et mortuos reducit ad vitam.
When among our fathers, as the book of Judges relates, certain Israelite tribes were fighting one another in civil war, and because of the like appearance of one people there could be no distinction between the combatants, the tribe whose cause for fighting was more just, since it rightly presumed victory through God's help, set itself a sign in a certain word, so that the secret of a hidden word might distinguish those whom one look of arms confused. Following this example, as I think, the blessed apostles handed down the mystery of the creed to the Church of God, which they were arming against the warfare of the devil's fury; so that, since under the one name of Christ there would be diversity among believers, the seal of the creed might separate the faithful from the unbelieving, and he might appear alien to the faith and an enemy of the Church who either, though baptized, did not know it, or, as a heretic, had corrupted it. “Do you believe,” it says, “in God the Father almighty?” God the Father almighty is without doubt to be believed, whose power is so felt that his greatness and nature are not known: for that he is and that he is able we attain not by discussing but by believing. Whom we ought to believe the authority of our Redeemer teaches us, saying: “He who believes in me and in him who sent me has eternal life”; and elsewhere: “Believe in God, and believe in me.” What we see with the eyes of faith, brothers, is more than fleshly sense can see. “Do you believe,” it says, “in God the Father almighty?” In “God” is shown unbegotten nature, in “Father” the reality of the only-begotten, in “almighty” the fullness of power. For he is almighty through his unbegotten deity and Father through his omnipotence; nor must it be inquired how he is Father, because how he is God or almighty cannot be comprehended. “And in Jesus Christ, his only Son, our Lord.” That he who was Son became Christ is the dispensation of human redemption; that he is Lord is of the property of his nature; he is announced and believed to be only, or only-begotten, because he alone was so begotten and has no partner in his birth. You hear “Son,” not so that you may think him produced by some sex, but so that you may believe that by incomprehensible majesty God came forth from God, as he himself says: “I came forth from the Father and have come into this world.” “Who was born of the Holy Spirit from the Virgin Mary.” You hear “Holy Spirit,” so that you may recognize that birth as both wonderful and blameless. For what the Spirit does is heavenly; what the Holy one works is inviolate. For when the need of our redemption required the only-begotten of God to become man, he brought this privilege of his own divinity into his birth: that he should be born of a virgin. For he who was coming to call back the nature of men, grown old in sins, willed to have a new law of being born. The only-begotten of God, then, became the son of man, so that he who was the Creator of the world might become its Redeemer too. “Who was crucified under Pontius Pilate and buried.” Let us have no shame at the cross of Christ, since we have victory from his passion: for as the everlasting Son of God was born not for himself but for us, so the spotless Lamb of God suffered not for himself but for us. Who would not notice that it is a wonderful mystery, where the one who is God is proclaimed a man, and the same one is announced as Lord who is declared crucified? Nor did his being killed happen to him as something unthought or unforeseen, who by the counsel of his divinity took on man for this very reason, that he might be killed for man. He chose the punishment of the cross so that a worse penalty might bring forth a loftier victory; and so that he who suffered for the good of all might die lifted on high as in the sight of the world, so that at the same time those who saw him crucified might see the wonders of the Crucified. For the sudden darkness of the sun, the trembling of the earth, the splitting of rocks, the resurrection of the dead show the glory of the sufferer quite fully. And of what weight of testimony is this: that even the thief crucified with him begged his companion in punishment to remember him in the heavenly kingdom? That is why, dearest ones, we do not groan with sighs over the mockeries and reproaches that Christ endured, his cross and his death, but celebrate them with continual praises. He was buried, because it followed that one who had died should receive burial. The Lord was buried so that the earth too might receive the blessing of his body for the consolation of the buried. He was buried so that he who was seen truly dead might be believed truly to have returned from the dead. “On the third day,” it says, “he rose from the dead.” If you have believed of Christ what is shameful, believe what is glorious; if you have believed what belongs to death, believe what belongs to life. For as in the passion there is the mystery of love, so in the resurrection there is the working of power, as he himself says: “I have power to lay down my life, and I have power to take it up again.” How, then, should life after death not be at his disposal, for whom to die was not a condition but a power? Nor is it anything great if we say: Christ could rise again, since it was impossible that the author of life should not return to life; or how could he be held by the laws of the underworld who died for this very reason, that death might lose its power? Let us, then, be no longer ashamed of his sufferings, nor fear at all because of his death, who had both the power to rise again and the nature to live. And what madness is it not to believe that he rose, at whose command the buried came out of the tomb? “He ascended into heaven.” Such glory befitted, brothers, the man who was born of a virgin; nor was it impossible for him to ascend to heaven to whom it was possible to triumph over the underworld. And it was necessary that he who had come from the kingdom to death should return after death to the kingdom. In this, dearest ones, there was a saving communion between heaven and earth, incomprehensible to human minds: and as the earth rejoiced that it had received the Son of God, so heaven rejoiced that it had received the son of man, as was sung by the prophet: “Let the heavens rejoice and the earth exult.” For as it is plain that the earth exults over God, so there is no doubt that heaven rejoices over man. “He sits at the right hand of the Father.” That Christ sits is the gift of a victor; that he sits at the right hand of the Father is the privilege of the Godhead and the fellowship of undivided love. And he is fittingly announced to sit at the Father's right hand, in whom the devil, who is wholly left-handed, found nothing of his will. “From there he will come to judge the living and the dead.” It is necessary, brothers, that he who created the human race should examine it, and he who redeemed it should judge it; and it is just that the almighty Lord should distinguish by a judge's examination his mortals whom he formed by the power of his divinity and saved by the Father's love. For what can be more equitable with God than that those whose life in the world was different should have their merits distinguished after this world? The living and the dead are said to be judged so that God's care may be believed to extend to all men. “And in the Holy Spirit.” This, dearest ones, is the unerring rule of truth: that those whose name is one should not have a different confession, and those who are one in heaven with themselves should not be separated by us on earth. For as nothing among creatures can be equal to the Godhead, so the nature of the Godhead excludes all division and inequality. For according to the truth of the Gospel, as the Son came forth from the Father, so the Spirit too proceeds from the Father; and as the only-begotten is the Son of God, so the Holy Spirit is God's; and as the Father has mercy on whom he wills, and the Son reveals the Father to whom he wills, so the Spirit too is read to breathe as he wills and to divide the gifts of heavenly graces as he wills. How, then, is the Spirit not to be believed one with the Father and the Son, to whom equally belongs the power to do what he wills? “The holy Church.” The Church is truly to be confessed holy, through which sanctification has been given to mortals, and, as the number of believers grows, a holier world exults in the praises of God in the tongues of almost all. The Church is holy, which, cleansed of the contagion of sins by the sacrament of baptism, sends the inhabitants of the earth across to heaven. “The forgiveness of sins.” The forgiveness of sins is above all to be believed, brothers, because this is the one remedy which frees the human race from the sentence of perpetual death. That is why the only-begotten of the Most High deigned to take flesh and embraced the cross: so that by indulgence he might make you innocent, who could not erase your crimes and sins. That is why the spotless Lamb was slain, so that by his blood the stain of the human race might be wiped away. See, brothers, the depth of the mystery, see the height of the sacrament: where death has given back life, and the filth of sinners has been washed away by the blood of the innocent. But this forgiveness does not feed you for sin; it warns you to fear sinning now, you who understand that you could not have been saved without pardon. For God's goodness does not arm us for guilt by the gift of his indulgence, but washes us for glory. “The resurrection of the flesh.” This is the end of our religion, this the sum of believing. And indeed, who that believes God could doubt the resurrection, when it is plain that this was the only cause of Christ's being born? For what other reason or what benefit was there that the Everlasting should deign to take flesh, except to give flesh perpetuity? What glory was it that the Son of God did not flee the cross, sought death, endured burial, unless he were to bring life to mortals by granting resurrection? That this can happen the Godhead makes believable, for whom all that he wills is possible. Indeed, so that we may take undoubted examples of rising again, this world itself, losing and recovering the appearance of its beauty, both dies and rises again. We certainly receive a proof of the future resurrection when grain entrusted to the furrows comes back into its stalk, and woods stripped by frost revive with renewed leaves; and all that the earth produces is given back multiplied either by seed or by root. What hardness of heart is it, then, not to believe that man is re-formed, when the things that were made are restored? This, dearest ones, is the creed, whose truth makes every believer a Christian; this is the creed which both sanctifies the living and brings the dead back to life.
Judg 12:5–6 (allusion, high confidence) · John 12:44 (quotation, high confidence) · John 5:24 (allusion, high confidence) · John 14:1 (quotation, high confidence) · John 16:28 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 1:35 (allusion, medium confidence) · John 1:29 (allusion, medium confidence) · Matt 27:45 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 27:51–52 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 23:42 (allusion, high confidence) · John 10:18 (quotation, high confidence) · Acts 2:24 (allusion, medium confidence) · John 11:43–44 (allusion, medium confidence) · Ps 96:11 (95:11 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Mark 16:19 (allusion, high confidence) · 2 Tim 4:1 (allusion, medium confidence) · John 15:26 (allusion, high confidence) · Rom 9:18 (allusion, medium confidence) · Matt 11:27 (allusion, high confidence) · John 3:8 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 12:11 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:36–37 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The creed, like the password of Judges 12, distinguishes the faithful from heretics; the preacher explains each article in turn: God the Father, the only Son, the virgin birth, the cross, burial, resurrection, ascension, session, judgment, the Spirit, the Church, forgiveness, and the resurrection of the flesh.
- The creed expounded is an older Latin (Roman–Italian) form, without “Creator of heaven and earth,” the descent into hell, or “communion of saints.” The password story is Judg 12:5–6. The Spirit's procession is stated from the Father (John 15:26).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slip and stray apparatus letter; OCR slip and stray apparatus marks; OCR slip; split word; OCR slips; joined words; missing stop; split word; stray apparatus letter; stray apparatus letter; OCR slip; stray apparatus marks; stray mark): Judicurn → Judicum; babitum → habitum; juslior erat causa pugnandi, a quia → justior erat causa pugnandi, quia; bibi certo → sibi certo; sacramentum Quod → sacramentum. Quod; Ecclesiæ c Dei → Ecclesiæ Dei; fidcles → fideles; Ecclesiæ, e aut tauquam → Ecclesiæ, aut tanquam; est g Deus → est Deus; h Quem autein → Quem autem; æsternam → æternam; i Credit;, → Creditis; Mei oculis → fidei oculis; It In Deo → In Deo; ostendilur → ostenditur; disqujrendum → disquirendum; omnipolens → omnipotens; unus m ita → unus ita; exit'i → exivi; Spirtum → Spiritum; n Cæleste → Cæleste; proprie divinitatis in. vexit → propriæ divinitatis invexit; hominum o revocare → hominum revocare; NuUa nobis P sit → Nulla nobis sit; cuusitio → consilio; qui a universitatis → qui pro universitatis; moituorum → mortuorum; consorle → consorte; Chrislus → Christus; Dominos → Dominus; cjus et terra suseiperct. Scpultus → ejus et terra susciperet. Sepultus; dcdecoris → dedecoris; glorias → gloriæ; potestatis e, → potestatis,; Polestatem → Potestatem; iterumsumendi → iterum sumendi; triomphare → triumphare; muter → inter; delle. ram → dexteram; e victoris manus → victoris munus; beue → bene; virlule → virtute; Deun', → Deum,; h Vivi → Vivi; referunLur → referuntur; apud so → apud se; Divinhatis j excludit. I Secundum → Divinitatis excludit. Secundum; verilatem → veritatem; procedit; a et → procedit; et; miseretor → miseretur; cœtestium → cœlestium; Ecdesia → Ecclesia; præcipue,fratres, peccatonnn → præcipue, fratres, peccatorum; gencris macnla → generis macula; vi, tam → vitam; enim d Dei → enim Dei; sed e abluit ad gloriam.1 → sed abluit ad gloriam.; Perpetruis → Perpetuus; nisi a carnem → nisi carnem; mudus → mundus; deco ris → decoris; rcsurgit → resurgit.
Topics: Trinity, Christology, Baptism, Eschatology, Heresy
Cite (SBL): Maximus of Turin, Hom. 83.1 (PL 57:433a–439a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/maximus-taurinensis-homiliae/83-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/maximus-taurinensis-homiliae/83-1
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-maximus-taurinensis-homiliae-83-1) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Bruni's Latin text as printed in Migne PL 57 (Open Greek and Latin digitization). No public-domain English translation exists and no modern English was available for checking, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
Chapter 84
84.1PL 57:441a–443a
Hesterna die satis gaudii accepisse vos credo, fraires dilectissimi, et tractatibus. domini et fratris nostri præsentis episcopi, qui tanta facundia res divinas disseruit, ut prædicatio ejus plena fuerit sacerdotii gratia, oratoris eloquentia, institutione doctoris. Nec mirum si is qui in pontificio primatus honorem obtinet, habeat etiam in prædicando primatus cloquium : ut virtutcs Dei, quas sancti pectoris arcano depromit, facundi sermonis oratione commendet. Atque ideo parvitatem meam scio auribus vestris minus solito placituram. Quis enim contentus est potare de rivulo, cum possit haurire de fontibus ? Terra enim aquarum tenuem rorem omnino non suscipit, posteaquam eam largus pluviarum imber infuderit. Sic igitur vestra dilectio inundata S. sacerdotis eloquio, sermonis mei non patietur vile fastidium. Quamvis enim doctus, quamvis disertus orator, elinguis videbitur, si coeperit loqui præsente ' meliore. Sed tamen habet solatium suum ista confusio. Nihil enim ruboris est comparatione summi sacerdotis displicere minimum sacerdotem : præser- tim cum juvare me possit beatorum insigne consortium. Si enim David unius societate sancti alterum sanctum fieri posse proclamat, dicens : Cum sancto sanctus eris (Psal. XVII) : quis ergo me, quamvis imperitum, quamvis peccaiorem non putet fieri posse prædicatorem virtute Domini, tantorum consortio magistrorum ? Igitur quoniam beatissimus frater noster sanctorum apostolorum laudes magno est prosecutus eloquio; debemus et nos ipsius sepulturam Domini prædicare: ut quia unius corporis membra videmur similibus obsequiis procurata, similibus quoque integrum corpus prædicationibuS exornetur. Videamus ergo de Domini corpore, posteaquam de cruce deponitnr, quid geratur. Accepit illud Joseph ab Arimathæa, vir justus, sicut ait evangelista, et in novo suo sepelit monumento, in quo nondum quisquam positus erat. Beatum ergo corpus Domini Christi, quod cum nascitur, utero virginis gignitur : cum recedit, justi tumulo commendatur. Beatum plane corpus, quod virginitas peperit, et justitia custodivit. Custodivit illud Joseph tumulus incorruptum, sicut servavit illud Mariæ uterus illibatum. Hic enim viri pollutione non 'araBitur, ibi mortis corruptione non læditur : novus illudventer concepit. Dominica ergo, et virgo vulva, et virgo est sepultura ; quin potius ipsam sepulturam vulvam dixerim ; est enim similitudo non parva. Sicut enim , Dominus de matris vulva vivus exivit, ita et de Josephvivus sepultura surrexit : et sicut tunc de utero ad prædicandum natus est, ita et nunc ad evangeliz3ndum renatus est de sepulcru. Nisi quod gloriosior ista quam illa nativitas. Illa enim corpus mortale genuit, hæc edidit immortale: post illam nativitatem ad Inferos descenditur, post hanc remeatur ad cœlos. Religiosior plane ista est quam illa nativitas. Illa enim totius mundi Dominum novem mensibus in utero clausum tenuit, hæc autem tridui tantum tumuli gremio custodivit; illa cunctorum spem tardius protulit, hxe omnium salutem citius suscitavil.
I believe, dearly beloved brothers, that yesterday you received joy enough, and from the discourses of my lord and brother the bishop who is present here, who treated divine things with such eloquence that his preaching was full of the grace of the priesthood, the eloquence of an orator, and the instruction of a teacher. And no wonder if he who holds the first rank of honour in the pontificate should also have the first rank of eloquence in preaching, so that he commends in the speech of an eloquent sermon the mighty works of God which he draws forth from the secret place of his holy breast. And so I know that my littleness will please your ears less than usual. For who is content to drink from a brook when he can draw from the springs? For the earth does not take in a thin dew of water at all once a generous shower of rain has soaked it. So too your love, flooded with the eloquence of the holy priest, will not put up with the cheap distaste of my sermon. For however learned, however fluent an orator may be, he will seem tongue-tied if he begins to speak in the presence of a better. Yet this embarrassment has its consolation. For there is nothing shameful in the least priest falling short in comparison with the highest priest, especially since the distinguished company of the blessed can help me. For if David proclaims that one holy man can become holy by the company of another, saying, "With the holy you will be holy": who then would not think that I, however unskilled, however much a sinner, can become a preacher by the power of the Lord through the company of such great teachers? Therefore, since our most blessed brother has followed the praises of the holy apostles with great eloquence, we too ought to preach the burial of the Lord himself, so that, since we seem to be members of one body attended with like services, the whole body may also be adorned with like preaching. Let us see, then, what is done with the Lord's body after it is taken down from the cross. Joseph of Arimathea, a just man, as the evangelist says, received it and buried it in his own new tomb, in which no one had yet been laid. Blessed, then, is the body of the Lord Christ, which when it is born is brought forth from the womb of a virgin, and when it departs is entrusted to the tomb of a just man. Blessed indeed is the body which virginity bore and justice guarded. Joseph's tomb kept it uncorrupted, just as Mary's womb preserved it unblemished. For in the one it was not defiled by the pollution of a man, in the other it was not harmed by the corruption of death; a new womb conceived it. The Lord's womb, then, is a virgin, and his burial place is a virgin; indeed I would call the burial place itself a womb, for the likeness is not small. For just as the Lord came forth alive from his mother's womb, so too he rose alive from Joseph's tomb; and just as then he was born from the womb in order to preach, so now he is reborn from the sepulchre in order to proclaim the gospel. Except that this birth is more glorious than that one. For that one brought forth a mortal body, this one an immortal; after that birth there is a descent to the underworld, after this one a return to heaven. This birth is plainly holier than that one. For that one held the Lord of the whole world shut in the womb for nine months, while this one kept him in the lap of the tomb for only three days; that one brought forth the hope of all more slowly, this one raised up the salvation of all more quickly.
Ps 18:25 (17:26 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 27:57 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 27:60 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 23:53 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: A visiting bishop's sermon is praised, and Joseph of Arimathea's new tomb is compared with the Virgin's womb as a second, more glorious birth of Christ.
- The bishop who preached the day before is not named; the occasion appears to be a feast of apostles. Psalm 18:25 (Vulgate 17:26) is quoted. The words rendered 'it was not defiled' read 'non araBitur' in the printed text, which is garbled; translated by sense.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slip and stray footnote letter; footnote letter joined to the word; footnote letter joined to the word; punctuation; stray footnote letter; stray footnote numeral): domini et afratris nostri → domini et fratris nostri; institutione doctorise Nec → institutione doctoris. Nec; in novo suo e sepelit → in novo suo sepelit; custodivit. i Custodivit → custodivit. Custodivit; Marim uterus → Mariæ uterus; Hic enim j viri → Hic enim viri; læeditur : k novus → læditur : novus; concepit. 1 Dominica → concepit. Dominica; ad Inferos a descenditur → ad Inferos descenditur.
Topics: Christology
Cite (SBL): Maximus of Turin, Hom. 84.1 (PL 57:441a–443a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/maximus-taurinensis-homiliae/84-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/maximus-taurinensis-homiliae/84-1
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-maximus-taurinensis-homiliae-84-1) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Bruni's Latin text as printed in Migne PL 57 (Open Greek and Latin digitization). No public-domain English translation exists and no modern English was available for checking, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
84.2PL 57:443a–445I
Quæ comparatio ventris et tomuli ; cum illa ex intimis visceribus edidit filium, hic autem solummodo locum præstiterit sepulturæ? 2 At ego dico, non minorem Joseph affectum fuisse quam Maria;. Siquidem illa utero Dominum, hic corde conceperit ; illa Salvatori membrorum suorum secretum pRestitit, hic secretum sui corporis non ncgavit; illa Dominum pannis involvit cum natus es!, hic linteis cum recessit; illa perunxit beatum corpus oleo, hic aromatibus honoravit. Conveniunt ergo sibi obsequia, convenit et affectus; unde necesse est et meritum convenire, nisi quod angelus Mariam ad obsequium admonuit, Joseph autem sola justitia persuasit; Joseph in suo sepulcro posuit Dominum. Legimus in propheta : Sepulcrum patens est guttur eorum (Psal. v). Si ergo sepulcrum patens est guttur hominum; vide ne forte secundum hanc similitudinem Dominum Joseph non tam in sepultura terrena posuerit, quam in monumento sui pectoris collocarit, et custodiendum illum susceperit, non tam memoria fragili elementorum, quam memoria sancta virtutum. Hæc virtutum fidelis est memoria, quae intra se continens Cbristum, laedi cum hæreticorum corruptione non patitur; de qua memoria in sacris dicit Dominus : Quotiescunque hoc facietis, in memoriam mei facietis, donec veniam (Luc. XXII). Quotiescunque enim Christum loquimur, toties eum sacri oris memoria commendamus. Sepulcrum ergo patens est guttur eorum. Recte plane dicit propheta; sfpulcrum enim Christi patens est evangelistarum beatum guttur, per quod illud æterno litterarum thesauro condiderunt. Patens autem sepulcrum ideo dicitur, quia qui vult ad Christi pervenire mysterium, non ingreditur ad illud, nisi per evangelicae Scripturæ secretum. In Literarum enim sacrarum quasi quodam novo vasculo commendandus est Dominus. Quisquis igitur illud videre desiderat, ibi et passionis ejus sacramentum invenit, et resurrectionis gloriam recognoscit. Patens ergo guttur sanctorum est; unde Apostolus atl Corinthios ait : Os nostrum patet ad ros, o Corinthii (I Cor. VI) : invitans eos ut prædicalionis suæ semper apertam januam ingrediantur m Christi secreta mysteria. In hac igitur pectoris memoria collocatur Dominus a Joseph, ut in justitie sede requiescat, et habeat Filius hominis ubi caput reclinet. Videamus igitur quare Salvator in aliena sepultura ponatur, ac suam non habeat sepulturam. Ideo in aliena sepultura ponitur, quia pro aliorum monebatur salute; mors enim ista non Uti illata est, sed nobis delata ; mors ista non illi accidit, sed nobis proficit. Ut quid ergo ei propria sepultura, qui in se mortem propriam non babebat? ut quid Hi tumulus in terris, cujus sedes manebat in cœlis? ut quid illi sepultura, qui tridui tantum temporis spatio, non tam in sepulcro mortuus jacuit, quam velut in lectuto dormens conquievit ? ipsa enim temporis brevitas declarat somnum fuisse quam mortem. Sepulcrum autem mortis est babitaculum necessarium; necessarium ergo non crat mortis habitaculum Christo, qui vita est, nec opus habebat semper vivens domicilio defunctorum. Recte autem hanc vitam DOS in nostro sepulcro condidimus, ut cum ipso vivificante mortem nostram a mortuis surgeremas. Unde et illa Maria Magdalene, quæ Dominum inter caeteros defunctos in sepulcro quærebat, arguitur et dicitur illi : Quid quæri. viventem cum mortuis (Luc. XXIV)? Huc est : quid quaeris apud iuferos quem rediisse jam constat ad superos ? quem illa adhuc non intelligens nec cognoscens, respondit illi : Domine, si tulisti eum, dicilo mihi ubi posuisti eum; et ego illum tollam. Existimabat enim illum, sicut dicit Scriptura, hortulanmn esse.' Sancta ergo et simplex femina Christum requirebat a Christo, ac devotione mentis prophetat, et nescit : ait enim Domino de semetipso : Si tu tulisti enim, dicito mihi. Recte interrogat, Si tu tulisti eum, ipse euim tulit corpus tuum, qui suscitavit; ipse tulit corpus. qui illud jacens ct dormitis sua aspiratione collegit. ipse tulit corpus, qui divinitatis illud virtute gestans portat ad cælos; atque ideo mulier sapien. ter interrogat et requirit : Si tu tulisti eum, dicito mihi ubi posuisti eum ? hoc est, si illud auferens de sepulcro ad paradisum transtulisti. Audierat enim ' illum diccutem latroni, Hodie mecum eris in paradiso (Luc. XXIII). Aut certe de infernis in Patris dextera collocasti, sicut ait Apostolus : Qua sursum sunt quærite, ubi Christus est ad dexteram Dei (Col. III). Beatus ergo qui ita quaerit Christum Dominum, ut credat eum et in paradiso constitutum, et in cœlesti- bus collocatum. Nam qui eum aut in infernis requirit, aut in tumulis, dicitur ei : Quid quæris viventem cum mortuis ?
What comparison is there between a womb and a tomb, when the one brought forth a son from her inmost being, while the other only provided a place of burial? But I say that Joseph's devotion was no less than Mary's. For she conceived the Lord in her womb, he in his heart; she offered the Saviour the hidden place of her members, he did not refuse him the hidden place of his own tomb; she wrapped the Lord in swaddling cloths when he was born, he in linen cloths when he departed; she anointed the blessed body with oil, he honoured it with spices. Their services, then, agree, and their devotion agrees; hence their merit must agree too, except that an angel admonished Mary to her service, whereas justice alone persuaded Joseph. Joseph laid the Lord in his own tomb. We read in the prophet: "Their throat is an open sepulchre." If, then, the throat of men is an open sepulchre, consider whether, according to this likeness, Joseph did not so much lay the Lord in an earthly grave as place him in the tomb of his own breast, and receive him to be kept not so much in a frail memorial of the elements as in the holy memory of the virtues. This memory of the virtues is faithful: holding Christ within itself, it does not allow him to be harmed by the corruption of heretics. Of this memory the Lord says in the holy mysteries: "As often as you do this, you will do it in memory of me, until I come." For as often as we speak of Christ, so often we commend him by the memory of a holy mouth. "Their throat," then, "is an open sepulchre." The prophet speaks rightly indeed; for the open sepulchre of Christ is the blessed throat of the evangelists, through which they laid him up in the everlasting treasury of letters. It is called an open sepulchre because whoever wishes to come to the mystery of Christ does not enter into it except through the hidden place of the gospel Scripture. For the Lord is to be entrusted to the sacred letters as to a new vessel. Whoever, then, desires to see him finds there both the mystery of his passion and recognizes the glory of his resurrection. The throat of the saints, then, is open; hence the Apostle says to the Corinthians: "Our mouth is open to you, O Corinthians," inviting them always to enter the open door of his preaching into the hidden mysteries of Christ. In this memory of the breast, then, the Lord is placed by Joseph, so that he may rest in the seat of justice and the Son of Man may have somewhere to lay his head. Let us see, then, why the Saviour is laid in another's tomb and has no tomb of his own. He is laid in another's tomb because he was dying for the salvation of others; for this death was not inflicted on him but borne for us; this death did not befall him, but it profits us. Why, then, should he have a tomb of his own who did not have his own death in himself? Why a grave on earth for him whose seat remained in heaven? Why a tomb for him who for the space of only three days did not so much lie dead in the sepulchre as rest like one sleeping on a couch? For the very shortness of the time declares that it was sleep rather than death. A sepulchre is the necessary dwelling of death; but a dwelling of death was not necessary for Christ, who is life, nor did he who lives for ever need the house of the dead. Rightly, then, did we lay up this life in our sepulchre, so that, as he gives life to our death, we might rise from the dead. Hence that Mary Magdalene too, who was seeking the Lord among the other dead in the tomb, is rebuked and told: "Why do you seek the living among the dead?" That is: why do you seek among those below one who, it is plain, has already returned to those above? Not yet understanding or recognizing him, she answered him: "Sir, if you have taken him away, tell me where you have laid him, and I will take him away." For she supposed, as Scripture says, that he was the gardener. The holy and simple woman, then, was seeking Christ from Christ, and in the devotion of her mind she prophesies without knowing it; for she says to the Lord about himself: "If you have taken him away, tell me." She asks rightly, "If you have taken him away"; for he himself took away his body, he who raised it; he himself took the body, who gathered it up by his breath as it lay sleeping; he himself took the body, who bears it by the power of his divinity and carries it to heaven. And so the woman wisely asks and inquires, "If you have taken him away, tell me where you have laid him"; that is, whether in taking it from the sepulchre you have carried it over to paradise; for she had heard him saying to the robber, "Today you will be with me in paradise"; or else whether you have placed it from the lower regions at the Father's right hand, as the Apostle says: "Seek the things that are above, where Christ is at the right hand of God." Blessed, then, is he who so seeks the Lord Christ as to believe him both established in paradise and placed in the heavenly places. For whoever seeks him either in the lower regions or in tombs is told: "Why do you seek the living among the dead?"
Ps 5:9 (5:11 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 22:19 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 11:26 (quotation, medium confidence) · 2 Cor 6:11 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 8:20 (allusion, medium confidence) · Luke 24:5 (quotation, high confidence) · John 20:15 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 23:43 (quotation, high confidence) · Col 3:1 (quotation, high confidence) · John 19:40 (allusion, medium confidence) · Luke 2:7 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Joseph's devotion in burying Christ is compared to Mary's in bearing him; the 'open sepulchre' is read as the evangelists' mouths, and Mary Magdalene's question is read as unwitting prophecy of the ascension.
- Psalm 5:9 (Vulgate 5:11) is quoted. The words of institution are cited in a form close to 1 Cor 11:25–26 combined with Luke 22:19. In 'ipse enim tulit corpus tuum' the printed text has 'your body'; translated as 'his body' by sense. The second person returns in the following questions, addressed to the Lord.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (stray footnote letter): hic corde conceperitc ; → hic corde conceperit ;; virtutum. e Hæc → virtutum. Hæc; nisi per j evangelicae → nisi per evangelicae; secretum. i In Literarum → secretum. In Literarum; vasculo k commendandus → vasculo commendandus; salute; o mors → salute; mors; sepultura, P qui → sepultura, qui; declarat a somnum → declarat somnum; superos ? d quem → superos ? quem; prophetat, e et nescit → prophetat, et nescit; corpus tuum, a qui → corpus tuum, qui; ad dexteram Dei i (Col → ad dexteram Dei (Col.
Topics: Christology, Scripture and canon
Cite (SBL): Maximus of Turin, Hom. 84.2 (PL 57:443a–445I; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/maximus-taurinensis-homiliae/84-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/maximus-taurinensis-homiliae/84-2
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-maximus-taurinensis-homiliae-84-2) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Bruni's Latin text as printed in Migne PL 57 (Open Greek and Latin digitization). No public-domain English translation exists and no modern English was available for checking, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
Chapter 85
85.1PL 57:445c–449a
Si diligenter audistis evangelicam lectionem, in- telligere potestis quae ministris ac sacerdotibus Dei reverentia debeatur, vel quia ipsos clericos invicem humilitatis sedulitate se oporteat prævenire. Ait Dominus percunctantibus discipulis quis eorum in repo cœlorum major esset futurus, statuto coram omnibus puerulo : Quicunque humiliaverit se sicut puer iste, hic major erit in regno cælorum (Matth. XVIII); unde intelligimus quod humilitate pervenitur ad regnum, simplicitate penetratur ad cœlum. Quisquis ergo cupit Divinitatis tenere fastigia, humilitatis ima sectetur; quicunque vult fratrem prævenlre regnando, prius illum præveniat obsequendo, sicut ait Apostolus : Honore invicem prævenientes (Rom. XII), vincat eum officiis, ut possit vincere sanctitate. Si enim te non laesit frater, obsequium meretur, ut diligas : quod si fursitan lxsit, magis officium meretur, ut vincas. Hæc enim nostræ Christianitatis summa est ut amantibus vicissitudinem , lædentibus patientiam rependamus. Qui ergo fuerit patientior ad injuriam, polenlior constituetur in regno; non enim ad imperium cœlorum pervenitur superbia, divitiis, præfectura, sed humilitate, pauperie, lenitate. Arcta enim et angusta est via quæ ducit ad regnum ( Matth. VII ). Quisquis ergo honoribus inflatus fuerit, et auri tbesauris dilatatus, tanquam onustum et impeditum animal, per angustum regni iter transire non poterit; simul etiam ut se existimat pervenisse, sarcinam ejus exigua porta non capiens, repercusso limine, retrorsum abire cogetur; tam enim angusta est diviti porta coelestis, quam est camelo acus foramen exiguum; unde ait Dominus : Facilius est cametum per foramen acus transire, quam divitem intrare in regnum coelorum (Matth. XIX). Sicut enim camelum, anima! tortuosum atque deforme, exigua caverna præterire non patitur; ita et divitem ava- rum atque mendacem arcta coeli janua minime in . trare permittit. Nam ideo nudi in sæculo nascimur, nudi etiam ad lavacrum accedimus, et nudi quoque, et expediti ad coeli januam properamus. Quam autem incongruum et absurdum est ut, quem nudum mater genuit, nudum suscipit Ecclesia, dives intrare velit in coelum ? propterea adolescenti illi diviti in Evangelio a Salvatore dicitur : Si vis perfectus esse, rende omnia tua, et da pauperibus. Usque adeo enim nuda virtus apta cælo est, ut, quamvis justus, quamvis sanctus, aurum vel divitias possidens, non possit esse perfectus. Talem enim voluit adolescentem illum Dominus ad paradisum redire, qualis Adam fuerat de paradisj sublimitate dejectus; nudus enim Adam incola paradisi fuit: denique post peccatum nuditatem suam pervidens, folio pudenla contexit. Prius enim quam peccaret bonestatis erat colore vestitus; atque ideo nuditatem inhonestam non natura instituit, sed delicti reatus invenit. Nam et sancti angeli in spleudid ssimo habitu constituti, nunquid tunicis operiuntur et palliis ? Sed cum sit in illis nativitatis suae nuda substantia, vestiti videntur esse, quod sancti sunt. Sic igitur et Adam custodiens honestatis angelicæ dignitatem, erat quidem nudus mundanis vestibus, sed immortalitatis erat splendore vestitus. Nihil pravum respiciebant ejus oculi; non cor ejus turpe aliquid cogitabat; erat apud honestas mentes nuditas ipsa vestita. Sicut enim apud nequam homines turpis cogitatio a concupiscentia vestibus non arcetur, ita apud sanctos viros honesta simplicitas ad concupiscendum nuditate non trahitur; sed sicut vitiosis ad corruptelam nuda sunt omnia, ita religiosis ad castimoniam operata sunt universa. Qu autem ait evangelica lectio ? Qui scandalizaverit unum de pusillis istis, qui in me credunt : expedit ei, ut suspendatur mola asinaria in collo ejus, D et mergatur in profundum maris ( Matth. xvm). Pusillos hic non ætate pueros sed malitia parvulos dicit; sicut Apostolus ait : Malitia parvuli estote, ut sensibus perfecti sitis (I Cor. xiv, 20 ). Qui sunt isti nisi clerici ido nei, monachi religiosi, vel laici Quisquis igitur his irreverens, aut contumeliosus exstiterit, bac belluina pœna plectetur, ut informi saxo relegalo illi ad coltum præcipitetur in mare. Sed videamus cur scandalizantibus Christianos ista poena decreta sit, aut quid sibi velit ipsa sententia; puto enim aliquod mysterium continere : quasi vero non sufficeret in mare homini demergendo saxum qualecumque noa magnum aut enorme, sed molæ asinariæ lapis ei relegetur ad collum, ut cum perituro homine pereat res usui necessaria. Sed puto hoc magis esse, quod in Scripturis asini figura populus gentilium nuncupatur, qui clausis oculis circa ignorantiæ molam er. roris sui gyro pertrabitur, et sine ulla cursus directione vestigiis in se sæpe redeuntibus invitus usui laborat alieno. Nonne enim tibi videtur molam asinariam volvere populus gentilis, quandiu in imperitiæ suæ labore versatur ? naturæ quidem vinculis alligatus, ut verbum Dei molat, Dominum coeli quærat, sed opertæ mentis cæcitate subfusus vultum animi erigere ad Deum, cordis oculos levare non possit ad cœlum. Sed quoniam mola asinana saxum esse constat; videamus si et paganorum talis est mola. Talis est plane; saxea enim mola est paganorum Jupiter, Herculesque lapideos, circa quos caecis oculis frequenti errore circumeunt. Caecos, inquam, dixerim eorum oculos qui putant se videre quod non vident; aspicientes enim saxum Deum se videre confidunt. Attamen qui molam volvit, consummandi aliquando finem operis habet, exeundi spem gerit laboris: cui vera mola asinaria ad collum suspenditur, portat lapidem, qui portare debuerat jugum Christi. Asinus ergo ad molam, cæcus ad lapidem, gentilis ad saxum, qui adorat eum quem non videt nec agnoscit. Deus enim non in manufac- Lis habitat, nec in metallo aut saxo cognoscitur. Hic ergo gentilis populus cum persecutionem Christiano intulerit, hac poena plectitur, ut cum sua sacrilega mola judicandi sæculi fluctibus demergatur.
If you have listened carefully to the gospel reading, you can understand what reverence is owed to the ministers and priests of God, and how the clergy themselves ought to anticipate one another with zeal in humility. When the disciples asked which of them would be greater in the kingdom of heaven, the Lord set a little child before them all and said: "Whoever humbles himself like this child, he will be greater in the kingdom of heaven"; from which we understand that the kingdom is reached by humility and heaven is entered by simplicity. Whoever, then, desires to hold the heights of the Godhead should pursue the depths of humility; whoever wishes to go before his brother in reigning should first go before him in serving, as the Apostle says, "Outdo one another in showing honour"; let him conquer him with kind services so that he may be able to conquer him in holiness. For if your brother has not hurt you, he deserves your service, so that you may love him; but if perhaps he has hurt you, he deserves your kindness all the more, so that you may conquer him. For this is the sum of our Christianity: that we repay those who love us with love in return and those who hurt us with patience. Whoever, then, is more patient under injury will be set up as more powerful in the kingdom; for one does not come to the empire of heaven by pride, riches, or a prefecture, but by humility, poverty, and gentleness. For narrow and confined is the way that leads to the kingdom. Whoever, then, is puffed up with honours and swollen with treasures of gold will not be able, like a loaded and encumbered beast, to pass along the narrow road of the kingdom; and as soon as he thinks he has arrived, the small gate will not admit his baggage, he will be thrown back from the threshold and forced to go back. For the gate of heaven is as narrow for a rich man as the eye of a needle is small for a camel; hence the Lord says: "It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven." For just as a small hole does not let the camel, a crooked and misshapen animal, pass through, so the narrow gate of heaven does not let in the greedy and lying rich man. For that is why we are born naked into the world, why we also come naked to the font, and why we hasten naked and unencumbered to the gate of heaven. And how unfitting and absurd it is that one whom his mother bore naked and the Church received naked should wish to enter heaven rich! That is why the Saviour says to that rich young man in the Gospel: "If you wish to be perfect, sell all that you have and give to the poor." So fitting for heaven is naked virtue that a man, however just, however holy, cannot be perfect while he possesses gold or riches. For the Lord wished that young man to return to paradise such as Adam had been when he was cast down from the height of paradise. For Adam dwelt in paradise naked; then after his sin, perceiving his nakedness, he covered his shame with a leaf. Before he sinned, he was clothed with the colour of honour; and so it was not nature that established shameful nakedness, but the guilt of sin that discovered it. For are the holy angels, set in their most splendid state, covered with tunics and cloaks? Yet though in them the substance of their birth is naked, they appear clothed because they are holy. So Adam too, keeping the dignity of angelic honour, was indeed naked of worldly clothing, but he was clothed in the splendour of immortality. His eyes looked on nothing depraved; his heart thought nothing shameful; among honourable minds nakedness itself was clothed. For just as among wicked men the shameful thought of lust is not kept off by clothes, so among holy men honourable simplicity is not drawn to lust by nakedness; but as to the vicious all things are naked for corruption, so to the devout all things are covered for chastity. And what does the gospel reading say? "Whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to stumble, it would be better for him that a donkey's millstone were hung around his neck and he were drowned in the depth of the sea." Here he calls little ones not children in age but those who are little in malice, as the Apostle says: "In malice be children, so that in understanding you may be mature." Who are these but worthy clergy, devout monks, or lay people? Whoever, then, is irreverent or insulting toward them will be punished with this brutish penalty: with a shapeless stone tied to his neck he will be thrown headlong into the sea. But let us see why this penalty is decreed for those who cause Christians to stumble, or what the sentence itself means; for I think it contains some mystery. As though any stone, not large or enormous, would not suffice for drowning a man in the sea, but the stone of a donkey's mill is to be tied to his neck, so that a thing necessary for use should perish with the man who perishes! But I think this rather is the point: in the Scriptures the Gentile people is named under the figure of the donkey, which with eyes shut is dragged round the mill of ignorance in the circle of its error, and without any straight course, its footsteps often returning on themselves, labours unwillingly for another's use. Does not the Gentile people seem to you to turn the donkey's millstone, as long as it is occupied in the toil of its ignorance? It is indeed bound by the bonds of nature to grind the word of God and seek the Lord of heaven, but, overcast by the blindness of a veiled mind, it cannot raise the face of its soul to God or lift the eyes of its heart to heaven. But since the donkey's mill is known to be a stone, let us see whether the pagans' mill is of that kind. Plainly it is; for the pagans' mill is a stone Jupiter and a stone Hercules, around which they go with blind eyes in constant wandering. Blind, I say, I would call the eyes of those who think they see what they do not see; for looking at a stone, they are confident that they see a god. And yet whoever turns a mill has some time an end of finishing the work and hope of leaving off the toil; but the one to whose neck the true donkey's millstone is hung carries a stone, he who ought to have carried the yoke of Christ. The donkey, then, to the mill, the blind man to the stone, the Gentile to the rock, who worships what he neither sees nor knows. For God does not dwell in things made with hands, nor is he known in metal or stone. This Gentile people, then, when it brings persecution on a Christian, is punished with this penalty: to be drowned with its sacrilegious millstone in the waves of the world that is to be judged.
Matt 18:4 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 12:10 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 7:14 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 19:24 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 19:21 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 3:7 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 18:6 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 14:20 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 11:29 (allusion, medium confidence) · Acts 17:24 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Humility and patience are the way to the narrow gate of heaven; the millstone of Matt 18:6 is read as the pagans' stone idols, the penalty of those who persecute Christians.
- The gospel reading is Matt 18:1–6. The phrase 'vel laici' in the list of the little ones seems to lack a qualifying word in the printed text.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip and stray footnote letter; leaked column number; stray footnote letter; stray mark): invicent k humilitatis → invicem humilitatis; pervenitur ad * regnum → pervenitur ad regnum; ducit ad e regnum → ducit ad regnum; unde ait 286 Dominus → unde ait Dominus; dicitur : J Si vis → dicitur : Si vis; pauperibus k. → pauperibus.; Nihil m pravum → Nihil pravum; sitis ° (I Cor → sitis (I Cor; videamus cur P scandalizantibus → videamus cur scandalizantibus; quandiu r in imperitiæ → quandiu in imperitiæ; ad Deum, a cordis → ad Deum, cordis.
Topics: Ethics, Persecution
Cite (SBL): Maximus of Turin, Hom. 85.1 (PL 57:445c–449a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/maximus-taurinensis-homiliae/85-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/maximus-taurinensis-homiliae/85-1
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-maximus-taurinensis-homiliae-85-1) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Bruni's Latin text as printed in Migne PL 57 (Open Greek and Latin digitization). No public-domain English translation exists and no modern English was available for checking, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
Chapter 86
86.1PL 57:449b–451a
Movet fortasse vos, fratres, quod tumullus bellorum et incursiones preciorum fieri audimus assidue, et cur nostris temporibus fiant dilectionem vestram fortasse plus movet. Sed hæc causa est quia, quanto magis proximi sumus mundi excidio, tanto magis regno sumus proximi Salvatoris. Ipse enim Dominus ait, quod in novissimis diebus exsurget gens contra gentem, et regnum adversus regnum (Marc. XXXI) : et alibi : Cum videritis bella, et terræmotus, et fames, scitote quoniam in proximo est regnum Dei (Matth. XXIV). Ergo vicinitas ista bellorum vicinum magis nobis Christum esse demonstrat. Atque ideo venientem adversarium timere non debco, quia per hæc signa venire potius intelligo Salvatorem, quamvis enim iste metum incutiat temporalem, ille tamen salutem defert sempiternam. Potens est autem idem Dominus, ut et hostilem a nobis repellat pavorem, ct suam nobis praesentiam largiatur. Per hos igitur bellorum tumultus mundi quoddam significatur excidium; futurum enim judicium Dei hæc inquietudo præcedit. Est autem quoddam commotionis judicium Dei videre quod metuas. Dum enim cauli sumus ad ea quæ cernimus, cautiorea ad illa efficimur quæ speramus. Vir antem sapiens his actibus terrenis instruitur quemadmodum futuri sæculi debeat judicium declinare, dum enim perspicit in hac coæmuni perturbatione primores viros tuitiones in moenibus preparare, ipse admonetur quemadmodum in futura eversione mundi defensionem præparat animabus. Cernimus armari civitatis por. tas, debemus etiam prius in nobis portas armare justitiæ, de quibus S. propheta dixit : Aperite mihi portas justitiæ (Psal. CXVII). Tunc autem civitatis porta munita csse poterit, si prius in nobis portae justitiæ muniantur. Etenim nihil prodest muros munire propugnaculis et Deum provocare peccatis. Illa enim constituitur ferro, saxis et sudibus, haec armatur mifericordia, innocentia, caslitate; illa telorum multitudine custoditnr, hrec orationum. frequentia defenditur. Et ad plenam tuitionem urbium portas principum solent signa præcedere : animarum nostrarum portas signum Salvatoris anticipet. Ergo, fratres, propter futurum judicium armis nos cœlestibus DIU- niamus, accingamur lorica fidei, salutis galea prote- gamur, verbo Dei spiritali gladio defendamur; qui enim his armis instructus fuerit nec præsentem per- - turbationem metuit, nec futurum judicium perlimescit. Siquidem sanctus David hac devotione protectus Goliam illum fortissimum armatum etiam inermis occiderit, et virum bellicosum munitionibus undique circumseptum sola fidei virtute prostraverit. Cum enim S. David non operiretur galea, non præcingeretur gladio, non lancea uteretur; occidit autem illum non telo ferreo, sed gladio spiritali. Quamvis enim inermis oculis hominum videretur, satis tamen erat gratia Divinitatis armatus. Verum ipse spiritalis gladius non fuit gladius; non enim gladio Golias, sed lapide prostratus occubuit. Legi. mns in Scripturis lapidis vocabulo Christum figura- liter designari; sicut ait propheta : Lapidem quem reprobaverunt ædificantes, htc factus est in caput anguli (Psal. CXVII). Igitur cum lapide Golias percutitur, Christi virtute prosternitur. Et in qua tandem corporis parte prosternitur? In fronte scilicet; gentilis est sacrilegus homo, ibi percutitur a Christo, ubi deerat Chrislus; et ibi ei infertur moilis exitium, ubi signum salutis non invenitur. Quamvis enim esset Golias unJique armorum protectione munitus, frons tamen ejus patebat ad mortem, quia signaculum Salvatoris non gestabat. Atque ideo ibi percutitur, nbi nudus a Dei gratia reperitur. Hæc autem in figura facta esse nemo est qui nesciat. Nam et David armorum induMentis sese ante præcinxerat ; sed cum esset in iis gravis et impeditus, ita ut ambulare vix posset, eadem sine cunctatione projecit, significans arma illa hujusmodi vana et luxuriosa esse opera, in quibus qui sese permiscere voluerit, tanquam gravis et gradiendi ad coelum cursum liberum non babebie. Simul et iUod nos docuit quod non in armis tantum speranda victoria est, sed in nomine Salvatoris oranda.
Perhaps, brothers, it troubles you that we constantly hear of the tumult of wars and the incursions of raiders, and perhaps it troubles your love still more why these things happen in our times. But this is the reason: the nearer we are to the destruction of the world, the nearer we are to the kingdom of the Saviour. For the Lord himself says that in the last days nation will rise against nation and kingdom against kingdom; and elsewhere: "When you see wars and earthquakes and famines, know that the kingdom of God is near." This nearness of wars, then, shows rather that Christ is near to us. And so I ought not to fear the coming enemy, because by these signs I understand rather that the Saviour is coming; for though the one strikes temporal fear, the other brings everlasting salvation. And the same Lord is able both to drive the terror of the enemy from us and to grant us his presence. By these tumults of wars, then, a certain destruction of the world is signified; for this unrest precedes the coming judgment of God. And it is a kind of judgment of God's disturbance to see what you should fear. For while we are careful about the things we see, we are made more careful about the things we hope for. The wise man is taught by these earthly doings how he ought to escape the judgment of the world to come; for when he sees, in this common disturbance, the leading men preparing defences on the walls, he is reminded how he should prepare a defence for souls in the future overthrow of the world. We see the gates of the city being armed; we ought first to arm in ourselves the gates of justice, of which the holy prophet said: "Open to me the gates of justice." For the gate of the city can be fortified only if the gates of justice are first fortified in us. Indeed, it profits nothing to fortify the walls with ramparts and provoke God with sins. For the one is built of iron, stones and stakes, the other is armed with mercy, innocence and chastity; the one is guarded by a multitude of weapons, the other is defended by frequency of prayers. And for the full protection of cities the standards of princes usually go before the gates: let the sign of the Saviour go before the gates of our souls. Therefore, brothers, because of the coming judgment let us fortify ourselves with heavenly arms; let us gird ourselves with the breastplate of faith, be protected with the helmet of salvation, and be defended with the word of God, the spiritual sword. For whoever is equipped with these arms neither fears the present disturbance nor dreads the coming judgment. Indeed, holy David, protected by this devotion, killed even unarmed that most mighty armed Goliath, and laid low by the power of faith alone a warlike man fenced about on every side with defences. For holy David was not covered with a helmet, not girded with a sword, did not use a spear; yet he killed him not with an iron weapon but with a spiritual sword. For though he seemed unarmed to the eyes of men, he was armed enough by the grace of the Godhead. And yet that spiritual sword was not a sword; for Goliath did not fall slain by a sword but by a stone. We read in the Scriptures that Christ is figuratively designated by the word "stone," as the prophet says: "The stone which the builders rejected has become the head of the corner." So when Goliath is struck with a stone, he is laid low by the power of Christ. And in what part of the body is he laid low? In the forehead, of course. The Gentile is a sacrilegious man: he is struck by Christ where Christ was lacking, and the destruction of death is brought on him where the sign of salvation is not found. For though Goliath was fortified on every side by the protection of his armour, his forehead lay open to death because it did not bear the seal of the Saviour. And so he is struck where he is found bare of the grace of God. That these things were done in figure there is no one who does not know. For David too had first girded himself with the garments of armour; but since he was heavy and hindered in them, so that he could hardly walk, he threw them off without hesitation, signifying that such armour is vain and luxurious works, in which whoever chooses to entangle himself will, being weighed down, not have a free course for walking to heaven. At the same time he taught us that victory is not to be hoped for in arms alone, but to be prayed for in the name of the Saviour.
Mark 13:8 (quotation, medium confidence) · Luke 21:31 (quotation, medium confidence) · Ps 118:19 (117:19 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Thess 5:8 (allusion, high confidence) · Eph 6:17 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Sam 17:49 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Sam 17:39 (allusion, high confidence) · Ps 118:22 (117:22 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Wars signal the nearness of Christ's kingdom; the city's gates should be defended by the 'gates of justice' and the Christian's spiritual armour, as David defeated Goliath with a stone that figures Christ.
- 'incursiones preciorum' is garbled in the printed text (perhaps 'praedonum', raiders, or 'proeliorum', battles); translated by sense. The text's reference 'Marc. XXXI' is evidently Mark 13:8. The forehead struck by the stone is read as the place of the sign of the cross ('signaculum Salvatoris').
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; stray footnote letter; stray footnote letter and OCR slip): iste m< tum incutiat → iste metum incutiat; primores viros e tuitiones → primores viros tuitiones; in a ligura facta → in figura facta.
Topics: Eschatology
Cite (SBL): Maximus of Turin, Hom. 86.1 (PL 57:449b–451a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/maximus-taurinensis-homiliae/86-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/maximus-taurinensis-homiliae/86-1
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-maximus-taurinensis-homiliae-86-1) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Bruni's Latin text as printed in Migne PL 57 (Open Greek and Latin digitization). No public-domain English translation exists and no modern English was available for checking, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.