Sermons to the People 292.1–292.8
Latin text: PL 38 (Latin text: Migne, PL 38, digitized by Open Greek and Latin (patrologia_latina-dev, University of Leipzig), CC BY-SA 4.0).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0). Compare: NPNF 1/6: Sermons on Selected Lessons of the New Testament (R. G. MacMullen, ed., 1888).
Chapter 292
292.1PL 38:1319
Dici hodiernæ solemnitas solemnem desidcrat tanta exspectatione sermonem. Ergo, "djuvantc Domino, ministrabimus vobis quod dederit, recolentes et animo tenentes nostræ officium servitutis, ut loquamur, non tanquam magistri, sed tanquam ministri; nou discipulis, sed condiscipulis; quia nee servis, sed conservis. Magister autem unus est nobis, cujus schola in tem est, et cathedra in caelo: cujus præcursor Joannes est natus, cujus nativitatis dies hodiernus traditur, hodie celebratur. Hoc majorum traditione suscepimus, hoc ad posteros imitanda devotione transmitlimus. Joannis ergo non Evangelistae, sed Baptistae Natalem hodie celebramus. Qua prima re posita, occurrit quæstio non prætereunda, quare Natalem, quo est ortus ex utero Joannes, potius celebremus, quam cujuslibet apostoli vel martyris vel prophetae vei patriarchae? Si interrogemur, quid respondebimus? Quantum mihi videtur, quantum mearum virium mediocritati occurrit, hæc causa est: Discipuli Domini nati, et per aetatis accessum ad annos capaciores perducti, in discipulatum assumpti sunt; illorum postea fides Domino adhaesit, sed nullius illorum nativitas Domino militavit. Recordemur et Prophetas, recola. mus Patriarchas: nati sunt homines, aetatis accessu repleti Spiritu sancto prophetaverunt Cbristum; nati sunt, ut postea prophetarent. Joannis autem ipsa nativitas Dominum Christum prophetavit, quem conceptum ex utcro salutavit.
The solemnity of today calls, with so great expectation, for a solemn sermon. So, with the Lord’s help, we shall minister to you what he gives, recalling and keeping in mind the duty of our service: that we speak not as masters but as ministers; not to disciples but to fellow disciples, because not to servants but to fellow servants. For we have one master, whose school is on earth and whose chair is in heaven; whose forerunner John was born, whose birthday is handed down as today and is celebrated today. We received this by the tradition of our elders; we pass it on to those who come after us with devotion to be imitated. We celebrate today, then, the birthday of John, not the evangelist but the Baptist. With this first point set down, a question arises that must not be passed over: why do we celebrate the birthday on which John came forth from the womb rather than that of any apostle or martyr or prophet or patriarch? If we are asked, what shall we answer? As far as it seems to me, as far as it occurs to my modest powers, this is the reason. The Lord’s disciples were born, and, brought by growth in age to more capable years, were taken into discipleship; their faith afterward cleaved to the Lord, but the birth of none of them served the Lord. Let us remember the prophets too, let us recall the patriarchs: they were born men; filled with the Holy Spirit as they grew in age, they prophesied Christ; they were born so that afterward they might prophesy. But John’s very birth prophesied the Lord Christ, whom, conceived, he greeted from the womb.
Matt 23:8 (allusion, medium confidence) · Luke 1:41 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The Church celebrates John’s birthday rather than any apostle’s or prophet’s because John’s very birth, in which he greeted Christ from the womb, was itself a prophecy of Christ.
- Allusions: Matt 23:8; Luke 1:41.
Topics: Christology
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 292.1 (PL 38:1319; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/augustine-sermones/292-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/augustine-sermones/292-1
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-292-1) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
292.2PL 38:1319–1321
Ista, ut potuimus, soluta quæstione, alteram aggrediamur, pro viribus quæ dedcrit Dominus. Occurrit enim alia quæstio aliquanto, ut mihi videtur, obstiusior, et ad perscrutandum laboriosior, in qua me multum adjuvabit vestra intentio, ct pro mea exiguitate ad Dominum deprecatio. Joannes iste lauta excellens gratia, ut quemadmodum dictum est, Dominum etiam ex utero salutaret, nondum loquendo, sed exsullando; cujus gratia in Deum jam tunc erat aperta, quando cjus caro in carne erat inclusa: hie ergo Joannes non invenitur inter discipulos Domini, sed invenitur potius discipulos habuisse cum Domino. Quid est hoc? Quis est iste homo? Homo tantus1, quis homo tantus? quantus tantus homo? Tamen non sequebatur inter discipulos Dominum, et sequebantur cum discipuli: absit ut dicam, contra Dominum; sed tamcn quasi extra Dominum. Discipulos hanebat Christus, discipulos habebat Joanues: docebat Christus, docebat Joannes. Quid jam dicam? Baptizabat Joannes, baptizabat Christus. Plus hic de baptismo dico, a Joanne baptizatus est Christus. Ubi sunt qui de ministerio Baptismi arrogantia tumidae animositatis inflantur? Ubi sunt voces carentes humilitate, elatæ superbia. Ego baptizo, ego baptizo! Quid dixisses, si Christum baptizare meruisses? Magna jam, quantum advertit San ctitas vestra, apparere et eminere causa cœpit, qua luerat et Christus a. Patre mittendus, et Joannes a Christo præmittendus. Prior missus est Joannes, sed sicut ab obsequentibus anteceditur judex. Posterior homo creatus cst Christus, sed Joannem creavit Deus Chri.. sms. Erat igitur Joannes homo perfectus quidem, et cujus tanta gratia commendata est, ut ipse de illo Dominus dicerct, In natis mulierum nemo exsurrexit major Joanne Baptista. Iste ergo lam magnus agnoscit Dominum in parvo magnum: agnoscit homo eum qui venerat homo Deus. Si enim in natis mulierum, hoc est, in hominibus, nemo exsurrexit major Joanne Baptista; quisquis Joanne plus cst, non tantum homo, sed et Deus est. Debuit ergo tantus iste, ct discipulos proprios habere, et cum discipulis suis magistrum omnium Christum cognoscerc. Quod enim est majus testimonium veritatis, quam se humiliando cum agnoscere, cui aemulando poterat invidere? Putari Christus potuit, et noluit: existimari Christus potuit, et noluit. Dixerunt homines, cum fallerentur in eo: Num forte hic est Christus? Respondit ille quod non erat, ut maneret quod crat. Inde quippe Adam lapsus perdidit quod erat, quia id quod non erat usurpavit. Recolebat hoc homo iste magnus. sed ut parvo Christo minimns: noverat hoc, recolebat hoc, et tenebat; quia recipere quod ille perdiderat cogitabat. Ilomo ergo iste, ut dixi, magnus Joannes, cui Dominus testimonium tale perhihuit, quem sic veritas commendavit, ut diceret, In natis mulierum non exsurrexit major Joanne Baptista; potuit crediChrislus, imo jam ab eis qui ejus magnitudinis gratia fallebantur, credebatur Christus: et in illo crrorc morerentur, nisi ab illo confitente corrigerentur. Respondit ergo ita putantibus, et ait: Non sum ego Christus. Tanquam diceret: Certe in honorem meum ita fallimini; et certe mihi hoc putando magnam additis laudem: sed ego me debeo agnoscere, ut vobis erranlibus iUe possit ignoscere. Si enim quod non erat fallaciter putaretur, ab illo qui erat veraciter amputaretur.
With this question resolved as we could, let us take up another, according to the strength the Lord gives. For another question arises, somewhat more obscure, as it seems to me, and more laborious to examine, in which your attention will greatly help me, and your prayer to the Lord for my smallness. This John, of such excellent grace that, as was said, he greeted the Lord even from the womb, not yet by speaking but by leaping—whose grace toward God was already open when his flesh was still enclosed in flesh—this John, then, is not found among the Lord’s disciples, but rather is found to have had disciples alongside the Lord. What is this? Who is this man? A man so great—what man so great? how great is so great a man? Yet he did not follow the Lord among the disciples, and disciples followed him: far be it from me to say against the Lord, but yet as it were outside the Lord. Christ had disciples, John had disciples; Christ taught, John taught. What more shall I say? John baptized, Christ baptized. I say more here about baptism: Christ was baptized by John. Where are those who are puffed up with the arrogance of swollen animosity about the ministry of baptism? Where are the voices lacking humility, lifted up with pride: “I baptize, I baptize!” What would you have said if you had been worthy to baptize Christ? Now, as Your Holiness notices, a great reason has begun to appear and stand out why Christ had to be sent by the Father, and John sent ahead by Christ. John was sent first, but as the judge is preceded by his attendants. Christ was created a man later, but God, Christ, created John. John, then, was a perfect man indeed, and one whose grace was so commended that the Lord himself said of him, “Among those born of women none has arisen greater than John the Baptist.” This man so great, then, recognizes the Lord, great in littleness; a man recognizes the One who had come as God-man. For if among those born of women, that is, among men, none has arisen greater than John the Baptist, whoever is more than John is not only man but also God. So great a man, then, had to have his own disciples and, with his disciples, to recognize Christ the master of all. For what greater testimony to the truth is there than to recognize, by humbling oneself, the one whom he could have envied as a rival? He could have been thought to be the Christ, and would not; he could have been reckoned the Christ, and would not. People said, when they were deceived about him: “Is this perhaps the Christ?” He answered that he was not, so that he might remain what he was. For Adam by falling lost what he was because he usurped what he was not. This great man remembered this, but as least before the little Christ: he knew this, remembered it, and held to it, because he was thinking of recovering what Adam had lost. This man, then, as I said, great John, to whom the Lord bore such testimony, whom the Truth so commended as to say, “Among those born of women none has arisen greater than John the Baptist,” could have been believed to be the Christ—indeed he was already believed to be the Christ by those who were deceived by the grace of his greatness; and they would have died in that error, had they not been corrected by his own confession. So he answered those who thought so, and said: “I am not the Christ.” As if to say: Surely you are deceived out of honor for me; and surely by thinking this you add great praise to me: but I must know myself, so that he may forgive you in your error. For if he were falsely thought to be what he was not, he would be cut off by him who truly was.
Luke 1:41 (allusion, high confidence) · John 3:22–26 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 3:13 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 11:11 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 3:15 (quotation, high confidence) · John 1:20 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: John had his own disciples and even baptized Christ, yet humbly confessed he was not the Christ; this shames those (the Donatists) who boast ‘I baptize’, and shows the greatest of men recognizing the God-man.
- The boast “I baptize” is aimed at the Donatists (the removed marginal heading reads “the proud voices of the Donatists”). Quotations and allusions: Luke 1:41; John 3:22–26; Matt 3:13–15; Matt 11:11; Luke 3:15; John 1:20.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's marginal headings left in the text): Cur tantus homo Joannes, nec inter discipulos Domini, sed discipulos habens cum Domino. Donatistarum voces superbæ. Ista → Ista.
Topics: Baptism, Heresy, Christology, Donatism, Humility and pride
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 292.2 (PL 38:1319–1321; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/augustine-sermones/292-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/augustine-sermones/292-2
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-292-2) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
292.3PL 38:1321
Præmissus est ergo Joannes, ut Dominum humilem baptizarct. Baptizari enim Dominus propter humilitatem voluit, non propter iniquitatem. Dominus Christus quare est baptizatus? Dominus Christus Dei Filius unigenitus, quare est baptizatus? Inveni quare est natus, et ibi invenies quare sit baptizatus. Ibi quippe invenies humilitatis viam, quam pcde superbo non carpis: quam nisi humili pede calcaveris, ad celsitudinem, quo perducit, pervenire non poicris. Baptizatus est propter te, qui descendit propter te. Vide quantus factus sit tantillus: Quicum in forma Dei esset, noM rapinam arbitratus est esse æqualis Deo. Non enim erat rapina, sed crat natura æqualitas Filii cum Patre. Joannes si se Christum putari vellet, illi rapina esset. Non ergo rapinam arbitratus est esse æqualis Deo. Erat enim, et sine rapina erat, coaeternus ab æterno natus erat. Tamen semetipsum exinanivit formam servi accipiens; hoc est, formam bominis accipiens. Qui cnm informa Dei esset, non formam Dei accepisset: ergo cum in forma Dii esset, semetipsum exinanivit, formam servi accipiens. Sic accepit quod non erat, ut non perderet quod erat. Manens Deus, hominem assumpsit. Formam servi accepit, et factus est Deus homo, a quo Deo fa; tus est homo. Vide ergo, quæ majestas, qua; potestas, quae sublimitas, quai cum Patre æqualitas venit propter nos ad indumentum formae servilis: et intellige illam a magistro tanto humilitatis viam; quoniam plus est quod voluit homo fieri, quam quod voluit ab homine baptizari.
John was sent ahead, then, so that he might baptize the humble Lord. For the Lord willed to be baptized because of humility, not because of iniquity. Why was the Lord Christ baptized? The Lord Christ, the only-begotten Son of God, why was he baptized? Find why he was born, and there you will find why he was baptized. For there you will find the way of humility, which you do not take with a proud foot; unless you tread it with a humble foot, you will not be able to reach the height to which it leads. He was baptized for your sake, he who came down for your sake. See how great became so small: “Who, though he was in the form of God, did not think it robbery to be equal with God.” For it was not robbery, but the equality of the Son with the Father was by nature. If John had wanted to be thought the Christ, it would have been robbery for him. So “he did not think it robbery to be equal with God.” For he was, and he was without robbery; coeternal, he had been born from the eternal. “Yet he emptied himself, taking the form of a servant”; that is, taking the form of a man. Since he was in the form of God, he had not received the form of God; so, since he was in the form of God, “he emptied himself, taking the form of a servant.” He so took what he was not as not to lose what he was. Remaining God, he took on man. He took the form of a servant, and God was made man, he by whom, as God, man was made. See, then, what majesty, what power, what sublimity, what equality with the Father came for our sake to the clothing of the servant’s form; and understand that way of humility from so great a teacher: for it is more that he willed to become man than that he willed to be baptized by a man.
Phil 2:6–7 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 3:13–15 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Christ was baptized out of humility, as he became man out of humility: equal to the Father by nature, he took the form of a servant without losing the form of God.
- Migne’s heading “CAPUT IV.—” stands in the text and is removed. Quotation: Phil 2:6–7.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's chapter heading left in the text): CAPUT IV.— → .
Topics: Christology, Baptism, Humility and pride, Incarnation
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 292.3 (PL 38:1321; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/augustine-sermones/292-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/augustine-sermones/292-3
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-292-3) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
292.4PL 38:1321–1323
Baptizat ergo, inquam, Joannes Christum, servus Dominum, vox Verbum. Mementote cnim, Ego sum vox clamantis in eremo: ct mementote quia Verbum caro factum eat, et habitavit in nobis. Baptizat ergo, inquam, Joannes Christum, scImus Dominum, vox Verbum, creatura Creatorem, lucerna solem; sed solem, qui fecit hunc solem; solem de quo dictum est, Ortus est mihi sol justitiæ, et sanitas in pennis ejus. De quo impii sero pœnitentes in line in judicio Dei dicturi sunt: Quid nobis profuit superbia? aut quid divitiarum jactantia contulit nobis? Transierunt illa omni' tanquam umbra: et cum umbris qui seculi sunt umbras. Ergo, inquiunt, erravimus a via veritatis, et justitiæ lumen non luxit nobis, et sol non est ortus nobis (Sap. v, G-8). Illis non cst orlus Christus, a quibus non ost agnitus Christus. Sol ille justitiæ, sine nube, sinc nocte; ipse non oritur malis, non oritur impiis, non oritur infidelibus. Nam solem istum de coelo cur-. poreum quotidie facit oriri super bonos et malos. Baptizavit ergo, ut dixi, creatura Creatorem, lucerna solem: et non se extulit baptizator, sed subdidit baptizando. Nam venienti ad se dixit: Tu venis ad me baptizari? Ego a te debeo baptizari. Magna confessio, ct sccura lucernæ in humilitate professio. Illa si contra solem extolleretur, vento superbiae cito exstinguerctur. Hoc est ergo quod Dominus prævidit, quod baptismo suo Dominus docuit. Baptizari voluit tantus a lanlillo; ut breve explicem, salvator a salvando. Nam meminerat Joannes alicujus fortassis, quamvis tantus esse!, agritudinis su:c. Nam unde, Ego a te debeo baptizari? Certe Domini Baptismus sa lus: quia Domini est salus. Nam vana salus hominum (Psal. ux, 13). Unde ergo, Ego a tedebeo baptizari, si non opus habebat curari?Mira autem in ipsa Domini humilitate medicina: ille baptizabat, et ille sanabat. Si enim Christus salvator omnium hominum, maxime fidelium: apostolica et vera sententia est, quia Christus salvator omnium hominum: nemo dicat, Non opus habeo salvatore. Qui hoc dicit, se medico non humiliat, sed in morbo suo perit. Si salvator omnium hominum, ergo et Joannis: neque enim Joannes non homo. Magnus quidem homo, sed tamen homo. Ille salvator omnium hominum: agnoscit itaque ille salvatorem suum. Neque enim Joannis non erat salvator Christus. Non hoc dicit ipse, qui humiliter confitetur, dicens: Ego a te debeo baptizari. Et Dominus: Sine modo, impleatur omnis justitia. Quid cst, omnis justitia? Humilitate commendavit justitiam: justitiam nobis maxime humilitate magister ccelestis et verus Dominus commendavit. Quod enim baptizabatur, ad humilitatem pertinebat: et ideo quod ad humilitatem pertinebat facturus, dixit: Impleatur omnis justitia.
So John baptizes Christ, I say: the servant the Lord, the voice the Word. For remember, “I am the voice of one crying in the wilderness”; and remember that “the Word became flesh and dwelt among us.” So John baptizes Christ, I say: the servant the Lord, the voice the Word, the creature the Creator, the lamp the sun; but the sun who made this sun; the sun of whom it was said, “The sun of justice has risen for me, and healing in his wings.” Of whom the impious, repenting too late at the end in God’s judgment, will say: “What has pride profited us? Or what has the boasting of riches brought us? All those things have passed away like a shadow”—and with the shadows those who followed shadows. “So,” they say, “we have strayed from the way of truth, and the light of justice has not shone for us, and the sun has not risen for us.” Christ has not risen for those by whom Christ has not been recognized. That sun of justice, without cloud, without night, does not rise for the wicked, does not rise for the impious, does not rise for unbelievers. For this bodily sun from the sky he makes to rise every day on the good and the bad. So, as I said, the creature baptized the Creator, the lamp the sun; and the baptizer did not exalt himself, but submitted himself in baptizing. For to him who came to him he said, “Do you come to me to be baptized? I ought to be baptized by you.” A great confession, and a safe profession of the lamp in humility. If it were lifted up against the sun, it would quickly be put out by the wind of pride. This, then, is what the Lord foresaw, what the Lord taught by his baptism. So great a one willed to be baptized by so small a one; to explain briefly, the Savior by one to be saved. For John, great as he was, perhaps remembered some sickness of his own. For why, “I ought to be baptized by you”? Surely the Lord’s baptism is salvation, because salvation is the Lord’s. “For vain is the salvation of man.” Why then, “I ought to be baptized by you,” if he had no need to be cured? But wonderful is the medicine in the very humility of the Lord: the one baptized, and the other healed. For if Christ is “the Savior of all men, especially of believers”—an apostolic and true statement, that Christ is the Savior of all men—let no one say, “I have no need of a Savior.” Whoever says this does not humble himself before the physician but perishes in his disease. If he is the Savior of all men, then also of John; for John was not other than a man. A great man indeed, but still a man. He is the Savior of all men: so John recognizes his Savior. For Christ was not other than John’s Savior. He himself does not say so, who humbly confesses, saying, “I ought to be baptized by you.” And the Lord: “Let it be so now; let all justice be fulfilled.” What is “all justice”? He commended justice by humility: the heavenly teacher and true Lord commended justice to us above all by humility. For his being baptized belonged to humility; and so, being about to do what belonged to humility, he said, “Let all justice be fulfilled.”
John 1:23 (quotation, high confidence) · John 1:14 (quotation, high confidence) · Mal 4:2 (3:20 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 5:45 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 3:14–15 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 3:8 (3:9 Vulg.) (allusion, medium confidence) · Ps 60:11 (59:13 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Tim 4:10 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The voice baptized the Word, the creature the Creator, the lamp the sun of justice; John confessed his own need of Christ the Savior of all, and Christ was baptized to fulfill all justice by humility.
- Quotations: John 1:23; John 1:14; Mal 4:2 (3:20 Vulg.); Wis 5:6–9; Matt 5:45; Matt 3:14–15; Ps 3:8 (3:9 Vulg.); Ps 60:11 (59:13 Vulg.); 1 Tim 4:10.
Extrabiblical texts: Wis 5:6-9 (Wisdom of Solomon [in RC, EO, ETH canons]; quotation)
Topics: Baptism, Christology, Humility and pride, Salvation
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 292.4 (PL 38:1321–1323; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/augustine-sermones/292-4). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/augustine-sermones/292-4
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-292-4) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
292.5PL 38:1323
Prrevidit multos inflaturos se de ministerio Baptismi, et dicturos, Ego baptizo; et, Qualis sum ego qui baptizo, talem facio quem baptizo. Unde hoc probas? Probo, inquit. Quibus testimoniis? Evangelicis, inquit. Audiamus nescio quem novum evangelistam contra antiquum Baptistam. Quibus ergo testimoniis evangelicis probas, quod qualis es, talem facis eum quem baptizas? Quoniam scriptum est, inquit, Arbor bona bonos fructus facit. Scriptum recito, Evangelium fero: Arbor bona bonos fructus facit, arbor mala malos fructus facit. Agnosco Evangelium: sed tu le, quantum arbitror, non agnoscis. Et ut tc patienter aliquantum feram, ex pone quod loqueris, non ine intellexisse interim deputa. Dic mihi quo pertineant hæc testimonia, quid adjuvent ad solvendam hujusmodi de Daptismate quæstionem. Arbor, inquit, bona, bonus baptizator est. Arbor, inquit, bona, sicut illi dicunt: arbor bona, inquit, bonus baptizator est; fructus ejns bonus, qui ab illo baptizatur: tunc enim crit fructus bonus, si ille fuerit arbor bona. Quid dicis de Christo et Joanne? Evigila, expergiscere, perstringit oculos tuos splendor perspicuæ veritatis; vide quid præmissum est ante nos; lege Evangelium: Joannes baptizavit Christum. Dicturus es, Jonnnes arbor, fructus Christus? Creaturam vocabis arborem, et fructum Creatorem? Ideo voluit Dominus Christus a Joanne baptizari, non ut per baptismum iniquitate careret, sed ut iniquitati os clauderet. Ecce qui baptizat, inferior est; qui baptizatur, dicturus sum, melior? Iloc forte ad me multum est intelligi. Ad homines redi, ambos vide homines. Ananias Paulum baptizavit. Anania Paulus melior fuit. Nunquam fructus arbore melior fuit. Arbor cnim profert fructum, non I rofertur a fructu.
He foresaw that many would be puffed up about the ministry of baptism and would say, “I baptize,” and, “As I am who baptize, so I make the one I baptize.” How do you prove this? “I prove it,” he says. By what testimonies? “By the Gospels,” he says. Let us hear some new evangelist or other against the ancient Baptist. By what Gospel testimonies, then, do you prove that as you are, so you make the one you baptize? “Because it is written,” he says, “a good tree bears good fruit. I recite what is written, I bring the Gospel: a good tree bears good fruit, a bad tree bears bad fruit.” I recognize the Gospel; but you, as far as I judge, do not recognize yourself. And so that I may bear with you patiently for a while, explain what you are saying; consider me for the time being not to have understood. Tell me what these testimonies refer to, how they help to settle this kind of question about baptism. “The good tree,” he says, “is the good baptizer.” “The good tree,” he says, as they say; “the good tree,” he says, “is the good baptizer; its good fruit is the one baptized by him: for the fruit will be good if he is a good tree.” What do you say about Christ and John? Wake up, rouse yourself: the splendor of clear truth dazzles your eyes. See what has been set before us; read the Gospel: John baptized Christ. Are you going to say, John the tree, Christ the fruit? Will you call the creature the tree and the Creator the fruit? The Lord Christ willed to be baptized by John, not in order to be free of iniquity through baptism, but in order to shut the mouth of iniquity. See, the one who baptizes is lower; shall I say that the one baptized is better? This perhaps is a great thing for me to understand. Go back to men; consider both as men. Ananias baptized Paul. Paul was better than Ananias. Never was fruit better than the tree. For the tree bears the fruit; it is not borne by the fruit.
Matt 7:17 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 3:13 (allusion, high confidence) · Acts 9:17–18 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Against the Donatist claim that a baptizer makes the baptized like himself, as a good tree bears good fruit, Augustine points out that John baptized Christ and Ananias baptized Paul, the greater by the lesser.
- The interlocutor speaks for the Donatists (the removed heading names them). Quotations and allusions: Matt 7:17; Matt 3:13–15; Acts 9:17–18.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's marginal heading left in the text): Donatistæ locum Evangelii de arbore et ejus fructu ad ministrum Baptismi perperam transferunt. Prrevidit → Prrevidit.
Topics: Baptism, Heresy, Donatism
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 292.5 (PL 38:1323; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/augustine-sermones/292-5). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/augustine-sermones/292-5
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-292-5) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
292.6PL 38:1323–1325
Tu quid tibi assamas, non vides? Ipse Dominus ait: Multi venient in nomine meo dicentes, Ego sum Christuo (fd. XXIV, 5). Multi errantes et seducentes venerunt in nomine Christi, nullum audivimus dicentem, Ego sum Christus. Innumerabiles hæretici venerunt omnes in nomine Christi, id est in nominc Christi palliati venerunt, parietem luteum splendido nomine dealbantes vencrunt, et neminem audivimus dicentem, Ego sum Christus. Quid ergo! Dominus nescivit quid praedixit? An potius nos ad intelligendum sccreta ipsa ad apertionem secreti de sommo excitavit, ut perscrutemur et pulsemus, ut nobis apcrialur qnod tectum est, et aperto tecto ad Dominum submitamur, ut sicu' ille paralyticus, a Domino sanari mereamur Marc. II, 5-12) * Prorsus invenimus istos dicentes, Ego sum Christus: non his verbis, sed quod pejus est, factis. Non audacia verborum istorum. Quis eniin eos audit? Quis ad aures vcl ad cor, tam insipientes deceptus admittit? Si dicat ei qui cum baptizaturus est, Ego sum Christus: avertit facicm suam ab illo, relinquit hominis arrogantiam manifestam, quærit Dei gratiam. Non ergo ita ille, Ego sum Christus. Sed quoniam alio modo, Ego sum Christus; videte quemadmodum. Christus sanat, Christus mundat, Christus justificat: homo non justificat. Quid cst justificare? Justum facere. Quomodo mortificare, mortuum facere; vivificare, vivum facere: sic et justificare, justuin facere. Ecce de transverso baptizator quidam, -non per januam intrans, sed per maceriam descendens; non pastor et custos, sed fur et latro; de trans- Terso ait, Ego baptizo. Si sicut minister, audeo 1: noli addere; quidquid amplius est a malo est. Et tamen addit, non dubitat. Quid addit? Ego justifico, ego justum facio. Hoc est enim, Ego suni arbor bona, ex me nascatur qui vult esse fructus bonus. Paululum, si sapienlci' admittis, audi; patra verba sunt, et nisi fallor, lucida sunt. Tu ergo justificas, tu justum fucis? Ergo, inquit 2, credat in te quem justificas. Dic, aude dicere, Crede in me; qui non dubitas dicere, Justificaris a me. Turbatur, fluctuat, excusat. Quid enim opus est, inquit, ut dicam illi, Crede in me? Crede in Christum, dico. Hæsitasti, dubitasti: aliquantum ad nos dignatus es descendere. Confessus es aliquid, unde saneris. Dixisti aliquid rectum, unde prava tua cætera corrigantur. Audi jam non inc, sed te. Certe enim non audes dicere, Crede in me. Absit, inquit. Et tamen audes dicerc, Justifico te. Audi, et disce, quia unde non andes dicerc, Crede in me; inde debes non audere dicere. Justifico te. Apostolus loquitur, cui cedes, cui vclis nolis, subderis. Non enim Apostolo tanquam homini, sed ei de quo dicit Apostolus, An vultis experimentum accipere ejus, qui in me loquitur Christus? Audi ergo non Apostolum, scI Christum pcr Apostolum. Quid dicit Apostolus? Credenti in eum qui justificat impium, deputatur fides ejus ad justitiam. Intendite. obsecro; videte quam planum cst, quam apertum est: Credenti in eum qui justificat impiam, deputatur fides ejus ad justitiam. Quisquis crediderit in eum qui justificat impium, qui de impio facit pium: qnisqnis ergo crediderit in cum qui justificat impiuin, qui justum facit cum qui impius crat, dcpuiatur fides ejus ad justitiam. Modo dir, si audes, Justifico te. Vide quomodo tibi respondi ex Apostolo: Si justificas me, credam iti te; quia crcdenti in eum qui justificat impium, deputatur fides eju adjustitiam. Justificas me? credam in te. Si enim t'i me justificas, ego ero credens in eum qui justificame, id est, qui justificat impium: securus credo, quia deputatur fides mea ad justitiam. Si ergo non audes dicere, Justifico te; imo si non audes dicere, Crede in me: cave jam ne dicas. Justifico te. Perdite, inveni te; ne perdas et me ct te.
Do you not see what you claim for yourself? The Lord himself says: “Many will come in my name, saying, I am the Christ.” Many who stray and lead astray have come in the name of Christ; we have heard none saying, “I am the Christ.” Countless heretics have all come in the name of Christ, that is, they have come cloaked in the name of Christ; they have come whitewashing a mud wall with a splendid name, and we have heard no one saying, “I am the Christ.” What then? Did the Lord not know what he foretold? Or did he rather rouse us from sleep to understand those very secrets, to the opening of the secret, so that we might search and knock, so that what is covered might be opened to us, and, the roof opened, we might be let down to the Lord, so that, like that paralytic, we might be worthy to be healed by the Lord? Indeed we find these men saying, “I am the Christ”: not with these words, but, what is worse, with deeds. Not with the audacity of these words. For who would listen to them? Who, deceived, would admit such foolish men to his ears or to his heart? If someone were to say to the one he is about to baptize, “I am the Christ,” he would turn his face away from him, leave the man’s manifest arrogance, and seek the grace of God. So he does not say it in this way, “I am the Christ.” But since he says “I am the Christ” in another way, see how. Christ heals, Christ cleanses, Christ justifies; man does not justify. What is to justify? To make just. As to mortify is to make dead, to vivify is to make alive, so to justify is to make just. See, a certain baptizer from the side, not entering by the door but climbing down over the wall; not a shepherd and keeper but a thief and robber; from the side he says, “I baptize.” If as a minister, I dare say: do not add anything; whatever is more is from evil. And yet he adds; he does not hesitate. What does he add? “I justify, I make just.” For this is, “I am a good tree; let whoever wants to be good fruit be born from me.” Listen a little, if you admit it wisely; the words are few and, unless I am mistaken, clear. So you justify, you make just? Then, I say, let the one you justify believe in you. Say it, dare to say it: “Believe in me,” you who do not hesitate to say, “You are justified by me.” He is troubled, he wavers, he excuses himself. “For what need is there,” he says, “for me to say to him, Believe in me? I say, Believe in Christ.” You have hesitated, you have doubted: you have deigned to come down to us a little. You have confessed something by which you may be healed. You have said something right, by which the rest of your crooked things may be corrected. Now listen, not to me, but to yourself. Surely you do not dare to say, “Believe in me.” “Far from it,” he says. And yet you dare to say, “I justify you.” Listen and learn that for the same reason that you do not dare to say, “Believe in me,” you ought not to dare to say, “I justify you.” The apostle speaks, to whom you will yield, to whom, willing or not, you will submit. Not to the apostle as to a man, but to him of whom the apostle says, “Do you want proof of him who speaks in me, Christ?” Listen, then, not to the apostle, but to Christ through the apostle. What does the apostle say? “To him who believes in him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is reckoned as justice.” Attend, I beg you; see how plain it is, how open: “To him who believes in him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is reckoned as justice.” Whoever believes in him who justifies the ungodly, who makes the ungodly godly—whoever, then, believes in him who justifies the ungodly, who makes just him who was ungodly, his faith is reckoned as justice. Now say, if you dare, “I justify you.” See how I have answered you from the apostle: if you justify me, I will believe in you; because to him who believes in him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is reckoned as justice. Do you justify me? I will believe in you. For if you justify me, I shall be one who believes in him who justifies me, that is, who justifies the ungodly: I believe securely, because my faith is reckoned as justice. If, then, you do not dare to say, “I justify you”—or rather, if you do not dare to say, “Believe in me”—beware now of saying, “I justify you.” Lost man, find yourself, lest you lose both me and yourself.
Matt 24:5 (quotation, high confidence) · Ezek 13:10 (allusion, medium confidence) · Mark 2:4–12 (allusion, high confidence) · John 10:1 (allusion, high confidence) · 2 Cor 13:3 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 4:5 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Those who claim ‘I justify you’ in baptism in effect say ‘I am the Christ’; but only the one in whom we believe, who justifies the ungodly, justifies, and no minister dares say ‘believe in me’.
- Aimed at the Donatists, who held that the holiness of the minister gives baptism its effect. The garbled phrase “Si sicut minister, audeo” is translated by sense. Quotations and allusions: Matt 24:5; Ezek 13:10–12; Mark 2:4–12; John 10:1; 2 Cor 13:3; Rom 4:5.
Topics: Baptism, Heresy, Justification, Faith
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 292.6 (PL 38:1323–1325; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/augustine-sermones/292-6). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/augustine-sermones/292-6
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-292-6) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
292.7PL 38:1325
Nam illud quod proposuisti de arbore et de fructu, propono tibi aliquid de exemplis, ut discas intelligecre qnod dicium est, Arbor bona bonos fructus facit, et arbor maia malos fructus facit. Ego enim sic intelligo, quomodo et ipse Dominus exponit. Quid cst, Arbor bona bonos fructus facit (Matth. VII t 17) r Bonus homo de bono thesauro cordis sui profert bona; et malus homo de malo thesauro cordis sui profert mula. Homines arbores posuit, thesauros actus posuit. Qualis homo cst, tales actus habet. Si bonus homo est, bonos actus habet; si malus bomo cst, malos actus habet: non potest bonus homo malos actus habere, nec malus homo bonos actus habire. Quid evidentius? quid liquidius? quid apertius? Modo autem te arborem facis bonam qui baptizas, et fructum facis eum quem baptizas; ut qualis es tu, talis sit ille. Absit ab illo, et vide qnam perverse intelligis. Est apud vos aliquis,:rit fuit aliquando adulter vel occultus. Sed quod nescio, inquit, non me contaminat. Non inde ago; alia quæstio est: de Baptismo vilo aliquid dicere; hoc enim suscepimus. Occultus adulter cst: crgo lictus cst; non adulter fictus, sed adulter verus, fictas castus. Istum ergo adulterum hominem fictum, magisque fictum, quia latet; nam si apertus sit adulter, jam fictus non est: istum ergo adulterum fugiet profecto Spiritus sanctus. Evidens quippe csL prolata sententia: Sanctus enim Spiritus disciplinæ effugiet fictum. Cum crgo sit isto adulter occultus, utique baptizat. Ecce video hominem baptizatum ab adultero occulto: natus cst fructus; ubi est arbor bona? Baptizatus est, innocens est, facta est in illo remissio peccatorum; ergo justificatus cst impius, natus est fructus honus: quæro de qua arbore? Dic, responde mibi: arbor illa occultus adulter est, mala arbor csl.; si hujus arboris iste fructus, malus fructus est. Sententia Domini f'SI, Arbor mala malos fructus facit. Respondebis, ut istum fruetum bonum csse commendes, non cum de illa arbore natum. Non enim quia nescis tu illam arborem malam, idco non cst mala: tanto cst pejor, quanto magis ignoratur. Tatio enim mngis ignoratur, quanto perdita astutia occullat factum suum. Nam si apertus adulter esset, vel confessione sanabilis esset. Pessima arbor, et tamen eccc fructus bonus. Unde natus? an forte non natus? Natus, inquis. Quæro unde: quid dicturus cs? Unde natus est iste? Non est quid dicat, nisi, De Deo: nescio utrum aliud dicturus cst, quam, Ex Deo. Si hoc de omnibus diceret, ct non sc, cum sil arbor mala, fingendo ostenderet bonam, faceretque pajorem, de omnibus diceret quod ex Dno nascuntur; babet Evangelii evidentem sententiam Dedit eis potestatem filios Dei fieri qui non ex carne, non ex sanguine, non ex voluntate viri, neque est voluntate carris, sed ex Deo nati sunt. Ergo redi ad istum: ex beo natus est? Ex Deo. Quare iste cx Deo? Quia fructus bonns de arbore mala nasci non potuit. Castus baptizator arbor bona est, non est ficius; vere castus haptizavit, fructus bonus de arbo! bona. Ecce et iste fructus bonus, de qua arbore natus est? Dic de mala, si audes. Non audeo, inquit. Ergo et ipse de bona? Do bona. De qua bona? Ex Deo. Ille quid? Ex homiue casto. Paululum intende: intelligamus quod dicimus. Istc ab homine casto baptizatus, ex arbore bona, id est, ex homine bono, natus est fructus bonus. Ille ab adaltero occulto baptizatus, ex arbore nuh natUs est fructus, quid? Itonus. Non potest fieri. Si bonus tit fructus: ergo arborem muta. Fructum istum bonum confiteris, illum hominem malum, quia occultus adulter est: arborem muta hoic fructui. Mutavi, inquis: ideo dixi, Et Deo. Jam compara istos duos natos: ilium baptizavit castus manifestus; hunc baptizavit adulter occultus: ille ex homine, iste ex Deonatus est. Felicius ergo natus cst ex adultero occulto, quam illo ex casto manifesto.
As for what you put forward about the tree and the fruit, I put to you something from examples, so that you may learn to understand what was said: “A good tree bears good fruit, and a bad tree bears bad fruit.” For I understand it as the Lord himself explains it. What is “A good tree bears good fruit”? “The good man out of the good treasure of his heart brings forth good things; and the evil man out of the evil treasure of his heart brings forth evil things.” He set men as trees, he set deeds as treasures. As the man is, such are his deeds. If he is a good man, he has good deeds; if he is a bad man, he has bad deeds: a good man cannot have bad deeds, nor a bad man good deeds. What is more evident? What clearer? What more open? But now you make yourself, who baptize, the good tree, and the one you baptize the fruit, so that as you are, so he may be. Far be that from him; and see how perversely you understand. There is someone among you who was once, perhaps, even a hidden adulterer. “But what I do not know,” he says, “does not contaminate me.” I am not dealing with that; that is another question. I want to say something about baptism; for this is what we have undertaken. He is a hidden adulterer: so he is feigned; not a feigned adulterer, but a true adulterer, feignedly chaste. This adulterer, then, a feigned man, and the more feigned because he is hidden—for if he were an open adulterer, he would no longer be feigned—this adulterer the Holy Spirit will surely flee. For the statement made is evident: “For the holy Spirit of discipline will flee the feigned.” Since, then, this man is a hidden adulterer, he certainly baptizes. See, I see a man baptized by a hidden adulterer: the fruit is born; where is the good tree? He has been baptized, he is innocent, the remission of sins has taken place in him; so the ungodly has been justified, good fruit has been born: I ask, from what tree? Tell me, answer me: that tree is a hidden adulterer, it is a bad tree; if this fruit is from this tree, it is bad fruit. The Lord’s statement is, “A bad tree bears bad fruit.” You will answer, in order to commend this fruit as good, that it was not born from that tree. For it is not because you do not know that tree is bad that it is not bad: it is the worse, the more it is unknown. For it is the more unknown, the more it hides its deed by lost cunning. For if he were an open adulterer, he would at least be curable by confession. A very bad tree, and yet see, good fruit. From where was it born? Or perhaps it was not born? “It was born,” you say. I ask, from where: what are you going to say? From where was this man born? He has nothing to say but “From God”: I do not know whether he will say anything other than “From God.” If he said this of all, and did not, while being a bad tree, show himself good by feigning and so make himself worse, he would say of all that they are born from God; he has the clear statement of the Gospel: “He gave them power to become children of God, who were born not of flesh, not of blood, not of the will of man, nor of the will of the flesh, but of God.” So return to this one: was he born from God? “From God.” Why is this one from God? “Because good fruit could not be born from a bad tree.” A chaste baptizer is a good tree, he is not feigned; truly chaste, he baptized: good fruit from a good tree. See, this one too is good fruit: from what tree was he born? Say “from a bad one,” if you dare. “I do not dare,” he says. So he too is from a good one? “From a good one.” From what good one? “From God.” And the other? “From a chaste man.” Attend a little: let us understand what we are saying. This one, baptized by a chaste man, from a good tree, that is, from a good man, is born good fruit. That one, baptized by a hidden adulterer, from a bad tree, is born fruit—what kind? Good. It cannot be. If the fruit is good, then change the tree. You confess that this fruit is good, that man bad, because he is a hidden adulterer: change the tree for this fruit. “I have changed it,” you say; “that is why I said, From God.” Now compare these two born ones: the one an openly chaste man baptized; this one a hidden adulterer baptized: the one is born from a man, this one from God. So he is born more happily from a hidden adulterer than the other from an openly chaste man.
Matt 7:17 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 6:45 (quotation, high confidence) · John 1:12–13 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The parable of the good and bad tree concerns a person’s deeds, not baptism; if a hidden adulterer baptizes, the Donatist must say the baptized is born of God, which would make him more fortunate than one baptized by a chaste minister.
- A reductio against the Donatist view; the Donatist reply (“what I do not know does not contaminate me”) is quoted as Augustine reports it. Quotations: Matt 7:17; Luke 6:45 (Matt 12:35); Wis 1:5; John 1:12–13.
Extrabiblical texts: Wis 1:5 (Wisdom of Solomon [in RC, EO, ETH canons]; quotation)
Topics: Baptism, Heresy, Donatism
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 292.7 (PL 38:1325; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/augustine-sermones/292-7). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/augustine-sermones/292-7
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-292-7) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).
292.8PL 38:1325–1327
Melius ergo Joannem audis, o hæretice; rnclius audis præcursorem recursor 1; melius audis humilem, o superbe; melius audis lucernam ardentem, o lucerna exstincta. Audi Joannem, cum ventretur ad eum: c Ego quidem baptizo vos in aqua » Et tu, si te agnoscas, minister es aquæ. « Ego, > inquit, < baptizo vos in aqua; qui veniet autem, mnjor rue cst. v Quantum major te est? a Cujus non sum dignus corrigiam calceamenti solvere. > Quantum se humiliaret, si se dignum diceret? Ne hoc quidcm dixit dignum so esse. corrigiam calceamenti solvere. Ipse est qui baptizat in Spiritu sancto. Quid te pro Christo supponis? Ipse baptizat in Spiritu sancto. Ergo ipse justificat. Tu quid dicis? Ego baptizo in Spiritu sancto, ego justifico. Certe non dicis, Ego sum Christus? Certe non es de illis, de quibus dictum est, Mutti venient in nomine meo dicentes, Ego sum Christus? Captus es: atque utinam vel captus inveniaris, qui non captus perieras. Bonum cst ad escam magni regis capi retibus veritatis. Noli ergo jam dicere, Ego justifico, ego sanctifico: ne convincaris dicere, Ego sum Christus. Dic potius quod amicus sponsi, noti qui te velis jactare pro sponso: Aeque qui plantat eat aliquid, neque qui rigat; sed qui incrementum dat Deus (I Cor. III, i;. Audi etiam ct ipsum, de quo agimus, amicum spons Certe cum Christo quasi discipulos habebat, et Christi discipulus non crat: audi illum confitentem sc Christi discipulum. Vide illum iutcr Christi discipulos, et lanto certiorem, quanto humiliorem; tanto humiliorem, quanto majorem. Vide illum facicntem quo,. scriptum est, Quanto magnus es, tanto humilia te in omnibus, et Coram Deo invenies gratiam. Jam dixit, Non sum dignus corrigiam calceementi solvere: sed non in boc se discipulum demonstravit. Qui de cœlo, inquit, venit, supcr omnes est (Joan. in, 51): uos autem omnes de plenitudine ejus accepimus. Ergo et ipse inter discipulos erat, qui cum Christo discipulos colligebat. Audi apertius fatentem se discipulum: Qui habet sponsam, sponsus est; amiere antem sponsi stat, et audit eum. Ei iJ. u stat, quia audit eum. Stat et audit; quia si non audia., cadit. Merito iUe, Auditui meo dabis, inquit, exsultationem et lætitiam. Quid est, auditui meo? Audire illum, non audiri velle pro illo. Et ut novenmus quia in eo quod audit eum, humilitatem commendat: cum dixisset, Auditui meo dabis exsultationem et lætitiam; continuo subjunxit, et exsultabunt ossa humiliata. Stat ergo et audit eum. Exsultabunt ossa humiliata, quia franguntur elata. Nullus ergo sibi servus potestatem Domini assumat. Gaudeat se esse in familia, et si est praepositus, proferat in tempore conservis cibaria (Matth. inv, 45); sed inde et ipse vivat, non ut de ipso illi vivant. Nam quid est proferre in tempore cibaria, nisi proferre Christum, laudare Christum, commendare Christum, prædicare Christum? hoc est, proferre in tempore cibaria. Nam ut esset ipse Christus cibaria jumentorum suorum, natus in praesepi positus est.
You would do better, then, to listen to John, O heretic; better to listen to the forerunner, you who run back; better to listen to the humble one, O proud man; better to listen to the burning lamp, O lamp put out. Listen to John, when people came to him: “I indeed baptize you in water.” And you, if you knew yourself, are a minister of water. “I,” he says, “baptize you in water; but he who will come is greater than I.” How much greater than you? “The strap of whose sandal I am not worthy to loosen.” How much would he humble himself if he said he was worthy? He did not even say that he was worthy to loosen the strap of his sandal. “He is the one who baptizes in the Holy Spirit.” Why do you put yourself in Christ’s place? He baptizes in the Holy Spirit. So he justifies. What do you say? “I baptize in the Holy Spirit, I justify.” Surely you do not say, “I am the Christ”? Surely you are not one of those of whom it was said, “Many will come in my name, saying, I am the Christ”? You are caught: and would that you might at least be found caught, you who, not caught, had perished. It is good to be caught in the nets of truth to become food for the great king. Do not say, then, any longer, “I justify, I sanctify,” lest you be convicted of saying, “I am the Christ.” Say rather what the friend of the bridegroom says, you who would boast yourself in place of the bridegroom: “Neither he who plants is anything, nor he who waters, but God who gives the growth.” Listen also to him of whom we are speaking, the friend of the bridegroom. Certainly he had disciples as it were alongside Christ, and he was not a disciple of Christ: hear him confessing himself a disciple of Christ. See him among the disciples of Christ, and so much the surer as the humbler, so much the humbler as the greater. See him doing what is written: “The greater you are, the more humble yourself in all things, and you will find grace before God.” He has already said, “I am not worthy to loosen the strap of his sandal”; but in this he did not show himself a disciple. “He who comes from heaven,” he says, “is above all; but we have all received from his fullness.” So he too was among the disciples, he who gathered disciples alongside Christ. Hear him confessing more openly that he is a disciple: “He who has the bride is the bridegroom; but the friend of the bridegroom stands and hears him.” And he stands because he hears him. He stands and hears; because if he does not hear, he falls. Rightly does that one say, “To my hearing you will give exultation and gladness.” What is “to my hearing”? To hear him, not to wish to be heard instead of him. And so that we might know that in hearing him he commends humility, when he had said, “To my hearing you will give exultation and gladness,” he at once added, “and the bones that have been humbled will exult.” So he stands and hears him. The humbled bones will exult, because the lifted-up ones are broken. Let no servant, then, take to himself the power of the Lord. Let him rejoice to be in the household, and if he is set over it, let him give his fellow servants their food in due season; but let him himself live from it, not let them live from him. For what is it to give food in due season, if not to bring forth Christ, praise Christ, commend Christ, preach Christ? This is to give food in due season. For so that Christ himself might be the food of his beasts of burden, he was born and placed in a manger.
Matt 3:11 (quotation, high confidence) · John 1:27 (quotation, high confidence) · John 1:33 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 24:5 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 3:7 (quotation, high confidence) · John 3:31 (quotation, high confidence) · John 1:16 (quotation, high confidence) · John 3:29 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 51:8 (50:10 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 24:45 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 2:7 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Augustine urges the Donatist to hear John, who called himself only a minister of water and a disciple of Christ, the one who baptizes in the Spirit; a minister must serve Christ as food, not set himself in Christ’s place.
- The digital text’s “præcursorem recursor” is read as a wordplay, “forerunner” and “one who runs back.” Quotations: Matt 3:11; John 1:27, 33; Matt 24:5; 1 Cor 3:7; Sir 3:18 (3:20 Vulg.); John 3:31; John 1:16; John 3:29; Ps 51:8 (50:10 Vulg.); Matt 24:45; Luke 2:7.
Extrabiblical texts: Sir 3:18 (Sirach [in RC, EO, ETH canons]; quotation)
Topics: Baptism, Heresy, Church office, Humility and pride, The Holy Spirit
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 292.8 (PL 38:1325–1327; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/augustine-sermones/292-8). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/augustine-sermones/292-8
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-292-8) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).