On the Catholic Way of Life and On the Manichaean Way of Life 1.12–1.22
Latin text: Migne, PL 32 (Latin text: Migne, Patrologia Latina, digitized by Open Greek and Latin (patrologia_latina-dev, University of Leipzig), CC BY-SA 4.0).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0). Compare: Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, series 1, vol. 4 (1887).
Chapter 1
1.12PL 32:1319
Non, inquit, separat alia creatura. O altissimo rum mysteriorum virum! Non fuit contentus dicere, crcatura; sed, alia, inquit, creatura, admonens etiam idipsum quo diligimus Deum, et quo inhaeremus Deo, id est animum atque mentem creaturam esse. Alia ergo creatura corpus est: et si animus res quædam est intelligibilis, id est quae tantum intelligendo inno tescit, alia creatura est omne sensibile, id est quod per oculos, vel aures, vel olfactum, vel gustum, vel tactum, quasi quamdam notitiam sui praebet; atque id deterius sit necesse est, quam quod intelligentia sola capilur. Ergo cum etiam Deus dignis animis notus non nisi per intelligentiam possit esse, cum tamen sit ipsa qua intelligitur mente præstantior; quippe qui creator ejus atque auctor est; verendum crat ne ani mus humanus, eo quod inter invisibilia et intelligibilia numeratur, ejusdem se naturae arbitraretur esse, cujus est ipse qui creavit; et sic ab eo superbia decideret, cui charitate jungendus est. Fit enim Deo similis quantum datum est, dum illustrandum illi atque illumi-* nandum se subjicit. Et si maxime ei propinquat subjectione ista qua similis fit, longe ab eo fiat necesse est audacia qua vult esse similior. Ipsa est qua I Ie gibus Dei obtemperare detrectat, dum suae potestatis esse cupit ut Deus est. Quanto ergo magis longe discedit a Deo, non loco, sed affectione atque cupiditate ad inferiora quam est ipse, tanto magis stultitia miseriaque completur. Dilectione igitur rodit in Deum, qua se illi non com ponere, sed supponere affectat. Quod quanto fecerit instantius ac studiosius, tanto erit beatior atque su blimior, et illo solo dominante liberrimus. Quamob rem nosse debet se esse creaturam. Debet enim crea torem suum credere sicuti est, inviolabili et incommu tabili semper manere natura veritatis atque sapientiæ: in se autem cadere posse stultitiam atque fallaciam, vel propter errores quibus exui desiderat, confiteri. Sed rursus cavere debet, ne ab ipsius Dei charitate, qua sanctificatur ut bcatissimus maneat, alterius crea turæ, id est hujus sensibilis mundi amore separetur. Non igitur separat nos alia creatura, siquidem et nos ipsi creatura sumus, a charitate Dei, quæ est in Christo Jesu Domino nostro.
“Nor,” he says, “will any other creature separate us.” O man of the deepest mysteries! He was not content to say “creature,” but said “any other creature,” reminding us that the very thing by which we love God and cleave to God, that is, the soul and mind, is itself a creature. The other creature, then, is the body; and if the mind is an intelligible thing, that is, one known only by understanding, the other creature is everything sensible, that is, everything that offers some knowledge of itself through the eyes, or ears, or smell, or taste, or touch; and this must be inferior to what is grasped by understanding alone. Since, then, God too can be known to worthy minds only through understanding, though he is more excellent than the very mind by which he is understood, being its creator and author, there was a danger that the human mind, because it is counted among invisible and intelligible things, might think itself to be of the same nature as he who created it, and so fall away through pride from him to whom it ought to be joined by love. For it becomes like God, as far as is granted it, when it submits itself to him to be enlightened and illumined by him. And if it draws nearest to him by this submission by which it becomes like him, it must become far from him by the presumption by which it wants to be more like him. It is this that refuses to obey the laws of God, when it desires to be its own master as God is. So the further it departs from God, not in place but in affection and desire for things lower than itself, the more it is filled with folly and misery. By love, then, it returns to God, a love by which it seeks not to set itself alongside him but to place itself beneath him. The more earnestly and zealously it does this, the happier and the more exalted it will be, and with him alone as master, most free. Therefore it must know that it is a creature. It must believe that its creator remains always, as he is, in the inviolable and unchangeable nature of truth and wisdom, and must confess that folly and falsehood can befall itself, if only because of the errors from which it longs to be freed. But again it must beware lest it be separated from the love of God himself, by which it is sanctified so as to remain most happy, by love of the other creature, that is, of this sensible world. No other creature, then, since we ourselves too are a creature, separates us from the love of God which is in Christ Jesus our Lord.
Rom 8:39 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Paul's phrase “any other creature” shows that the mind too is a creature; it becomes like God by humble submission in love, not by proud claims to equality, and must not be drawn from him by love of the sensible world.
Topics: Ethics
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Mor. 1.12 (PL 32:1319; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-moribus/1-12/#p-1-12). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-moribus-1-12) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text of the Open Greek and Latin project); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of R. Stothert in NPNF¹ 4 (1887).
1.13PL 32:1319–1321
Dicat nobis idem Paulus, quis iste sit Christus Jesus Dominus noster: Vocalis, inquit, prædicamus Christum Dei Virtutem et Dei Sapientiam ( I Cor. I,; i, 24 ). Quid? ipse Christus nonne inquit, Ego sum Veritas? Si ergo qua rimus quid sit bene vivere, id cst ad beatitudinem bcne vivendo tendere, id erit pro recto amare Virlulcm, amare Sapientiam, amare Ve ritatem, ct amare ex toto corde, el ex tota anima, ct dx tota mente; Virtutem qua; inviolabilis et invicta est, Sapientiam cui stultitia non succedit, Veritatem quæ converti atque aliter quam semper est sese ha here non novit. Per hanc ipse cernitur Pater; dictum est cnim: Nemo venit ad Patrem, nisi per mc. Huic haremus per sanctificationem. Sancti ficati enim plena et integra charitate flagramus, qua sola efficitur ut a Deo non avertamur, eique potius quam huic mundo conformemur: Prædestinavit enim, ut ait idem Apostolus, conformes nos ficri imaginis Filii ejus ( Rom. vIm, 29). Fit ergo per charitatem ut conformemur Deo, et ex eo conformati atque configurati, et circumcisi ab hoc mundo, non confundamur cum iis quae nobis debent essc subjecta. Fit autem hoc per Spiritum san ctum. Spes enim, inquit, noM confundit; quoniam cha-. riMas Dei diffusa est in cordibus nostris per, Spiritum sunctum qui datus cst nobis ( Id. v, 5 ). Nullo modo autem redintegrari possemus per Spiritum sanctum, nisi et ipse semper et integer et incommutabilis pcr maneret. Quod profecto non posset, nisi Dci naturæ esset ac ipsius substantiæ, cui soli incommutabilitas atque ut ita dicam, invertibilitas semper est I. Crea tura enim neque hoc ego, sed idem Paulus clamat, vanitati subjecta est (ld. VIII, 20). Ncquc nos potest a vanitate separare, veritatique connectere, quod sub jectum cst vanitati. Et hoc nobis Spiritus sanctus præstat: creatura igitur non est. Quia omne quod est, aut Deus, aut crealura est.
Let the same Paul tell us who this Christ Jesus our Lord is. “To those who are called,” he says, “we preach Christ, the Power of God and the Wisdom of God.” And does not Christ himself say, “I am the Truth”? If, then, we ask what it is to live well, that is, to strive toward happiness by living well, it will surely be to love Power, to love Wisdom, to love Truth, and to love them with all the heart, and with all the soul, and with all the mind: Power that is inviolable and unconquered, Wisdom that no folly replaces, Truth that knows no change and no being otherwise than as it always is. Through this the Father himself is seen; for it was said, “No one comes to the Father except through me.” To this we cleave by sanctification. For when we are sanctified we burn with a full and complete love, which alone makes us not turn away from God and be conformed to him rather than to this world: for, as the same Apostle says, “He predestined us to be conformed to the image of his Son.” Through love, then, we are conformed to God, and being conformed and shaped by him, and cut off from this world, we are not confused with the things that ought to be subject to us. And this is done by the Holy Spirit. For “hope,” he says, “does not put us to shame, because the love of God has been poured out in our hearts through the Holy Spirit who has been given to us.” But we could in no way be restored to wholeness by the Holy Spirit unless he himself remained always whole and unchangeable. This he certainly could not do unless he were of the nature and very substance of God, to whom alone belongs unchangeableness and, so to speak, unalterability always. For the creature, not I but the same Paul cries out, “was subjected to futility.” And what is subject to futility cannot separate us from futility and join us to truth. But the Holy Spirit does this for us: therefore he is not a creature. For everything that exists is either God or a creature.
1 Cor 1:24 (quotation, high confidence) · John 14:6 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 8:29 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 5:5 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 8:20 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Christ is the Power, Wisdom, and Truth of God, to whom we are conformed by love poured out by the Holy Spirit, who, since he restores us to wholeness and is unchangeable, is God and not a creature.
- 1 Cor 1:24; John 14:6 (twice); Rom 8:29; Rom 5:5; Rom 8:20.
- The argument that the Holy Spirit is not a creature is translated as written.
Topics: Christology, Trinity, Ethics
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Mor. 1.13 (PL 32:1319–1321; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-moribus/1-12/#p-1-13). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-moribus-1-13) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text of the Open Greek and Latin project); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of R. Stothert in NPNF¹ 4 (1887).
1.14PL 32:1321
Dcum ergo diligere dcbenms trinam quamdam unitatem, Patrem ct Filium et Spiritum sanctum, qnod nihil aliud dicam esse, nisi idipsum esse. Est euim vere summeque Deus, ex quo omnia, per quem omnia, in quoomnia: hæc verba Pauli sunt. Quid deinde sub jicit? Ipsi gloria ( Rom. XI, 36). Sincerissime omnino. NeqHC enim ait, ipsis: nam unus cst Deus. Quid cst autem, ipsi gloria, r.isi ipsi optima ct summa ct latc patens fama? Quanto cnim melius atquediffusius dif famatur, lauto diligitur et amatur ardentius. Quod cum fit, nihil aliud ab humano gcucrc qnam certo et constanti gradu in optimam vitam ct beatissimam pergitur. Non arbitror cum de moribus ct vi:a fit quæ stio, amplius esse requirendum, quod sit hominis summum bonum, quo referenda sunt omnia. Id enim esse patuit, ct ratione quantum valuimus, et ea quæ nostræ rationi antecellit aucteritate divina, nihil aliud quam ipsum Deum. Nam quid erit aliud optimum bo minis, nisi cui inhaerere est bcatissimum? Id autem est solus Deus, cui hærere certe non valemus, nisi dilectione, amore, charitate.
We ought therefore to love God, a certain threefold unity, Father and Son and Holy Spirit, which I will call nothing other than Being itself. For he is truly and supremely God, “from whom are all things, through whom are all things, in whom are all things”: these are Paul's words. What does he add next? “To him be glory.” Most precisely put. For he does not say “to them”: for God is one. And what is “to him be glory,” but the best, highest, and most widespread renown to him? For the better and more widely he is made known, the more ardently he is loved and cherished. And when this happens, the human race advances with sure and steady step to the best and happiest life. I do not think that, when the question is about morals and life, we need inquire further what the highest good of a human being is, to which everything must be referred. For it has been made plain, both by reason as far as we were able, and by the divine authority which surpasses our reason, that it is nothing other than God himself. For what will be the best for a human being but that to cleave to which is happiest? And that is God alone, to whom we certainly cannot cleave except by love, affection, and charity.
Rom 11:36 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: God, the threefold unity of Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, is the highest good of human beings, and we cleave to him only by love.
- Rom 11:36. “which I will call nothing other than Being itself”: the Latin (idipsum esse) is compressed; it may mean “the selfsame” (an allusion to Ps 4:9 Vulgate, in idipsum) or “being itself” (uncertain).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (footnote digit attached to a word): ergo2 → ergo.
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Mor. 1.14 (PL 32:1321; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-moribus/1-12/#p-1-14). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-moribus-1-14) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text of the Open Greek and Latin project); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of R. Stothert in NPNF¹ 4 (1887).
1.15PL 32:1321
Quod si virtus ad beatam vitam nos ducit, nibil omnino esse virtutem affirmaverim, nisi summum amorem Oei. Nantque il1nd quod quadripartita dicitur virtus, ex ipsius amoris vario quodam affectu, quan tum intelligo, dicitur. Itaque illas quatuor virtutes, quarum utinam iia sit in mentibus vis I; ut nomina in ore sunt omnium, sic etiam defuirc non dubitem, at temperantia sit amor integrum se præberis ei quod amatur; fortitudo, amir facile tolerans omnia propter quod amatur; justi!ia, amor soli amato servicns, et propterca recte dominatis; pfudentia, amor ea quibus adjuvatur ab cis quibus impeditur, sngacitcr seligens. Sed hunc amorem non cujuslibet, sed Dei esse dixi mus, id est summi boni, summx sapientiæ, summæ quc concordiæ. Quare dcfinire etiam sic licct, iit tetn perantiam dicamus esse amorcm Dco sese integrum incorruptumque servantem; fortitudincm, amorem omnia propter Deum facile perferentem; justitiam, amorem Deo tantum servientem, et ob boc bene impe rantem cæteris quæ homini subjecta sunt; prud ntiam, amorem bene discernentem ea quibus adjuvetur in Deum, ab iis quibus impediri potest.
And if virtue leads us to the happy life, I would affirm that virtue is nothing at all but the highest love of God. For what is called the fourfold division of virtue is so called, as far as I understand, from different dispositions of this same love. So I would not hesitate to define those four virtues (would that their force were in all minds as their names are in all mouths!) as follows: temperance is love giving itself wholly to what is loved; fortitude is love readily bearing all things for the sake of what is loved; justice is love serving only what is loved, and therefore ruling rightly; prudence is love wisely choosing between what helps it and what hinders it. But this love, we have said, is not of just anything, but of God, that is, of the highest good, the highest wisdom, and the highest harmony. So we may also define them thus: temperance is love keeping itself whole and incorrupt for God; fortitude is love readily bearing all things for God's sake; justice is love serving God alone, and therefore ruling well all else that is subject to a human being; prudence is love discerning well what helps it toward God from what can hinder it.
Notes and citation
Summary: Augustine defines the four cardinal virtues, temperance, fortitude, justice, and prudence, as forms of the love of God.
Topics: Ethics
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Mor. 1.15 (PL 32:1321; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-moribus/1-12/#p-1-15). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-moribus-1-15) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text of the Open Greek and Latin project); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of R. Stothert in NPNF¹ 4 (1887).
1.16PL 32:1321–1323
His dc singulis virtutibus quinam vivendi mo dus ducatur, paucis explicabo, si prius testimoniis Novi Testamenti, quibus utor jam diu, de Veteri etiam paria, ut pollicitus sum, comparavcro. Num cui... Paulus tantum dicit, Dco nos esse debere subjunctos 2, ita ut in medio quod scparct nibil sit? Noune et pro pheta commodIssime hoc et brevissime significat, cum dicit: Mihi autem adhærere Deo bonum esti Nonne quod ibi latissime de charitate di ctum cst, hie uno verbo continetur quod ait, inhærere? item quod addidit, bonum eat, nonne ad illud respicit, quod ibi positum est, Diligentibus Deum omnia proca dunt in bonum? ita ut una scule;: iiola duobusquc verbis propheta et vim et fructum charitatis ostendat. Cumquc ibi dictum sit, Dei Filium, Dei Virtu tem esse atquc Sapicntiam; cumquc virtus ad opcrationcm, sapientia vero ad disciplinam pertinere intelligatur unde in Evangelio duo ipsa signamur, cum dicitur, Omnia per ipsum facta sunt; nam hoc operationis atque virtutis cst: dtindo qnod ad disciplinam verique cognitionem attinet, Et vita, inquit, erat lux hominum [Joan. I, 3, 4]): potuitne quidquam magis concinere his testimoniis Novi Testa tnenti, qnam illud quod in Vetere dictum est de sa pientia, Attingil autem a fine usque m finem fortiter, et disponit omnia suaviter? Namque attingere fortiter magis virtulem significat: disponere autem suaviter, quasi artem ipsam atquc rationem. Sed si hoc videtur obacurum, vide quae sequuntur: Et omnium, inquit, Dominus dilexit illam: doctrix est enim disciplinæ Dei, et electrix operum illiul. Videtur hic nihil aliud de operatione dicium; non enim hoc est eligere opera, quod operari: ergo haec ad disciplinam pertinent; opus virtuti debetur, ut sit plena, quam volumus de monstrare, sententia. Lege igitur deinceps quod an nexum est. Quod si honesta eat, inquit, possessio quae concupiscitur in vita, quid sapientia est honestius,quæ ' omnia operatur? Potestne quidquam præclarius aut manifestius, aut vero etiam uberius proferri? Audi aliud, si parum putas, quod idem sonet: Sobrielalem enim sapientia docet, inquit, et justitiam et virtutem. Sobrietas mihi ad ipsam cognitionem veri videtur per tinere, id est ad disciplinam: justitia vero et virtus ad actionem atque ad operationem. Quibus duobus, id est agendi efficacia, et sobrietate contemplandi, quæ Dei Virtus et Dei Sapientia, id est Dei Filius, dilectoribus suis donat, quid comparandum sit nescio, cum idem propheta statim dicat quanti sint ista pen denda: nam ita positum est, Sobrietatem enim sapien tia docet, et justitiam, ei virtutem, quibus utilius nihil est in vita hominibus. Haec fortasse quispiam non de Filio Dei dicta esse arbitretur. Quid ergo aliud ostendit quod dictum est, Generositatem magnificat, contubernium habens Dei?. An vero generositas solet significare aliud quam parentes? Contubernium vero nonne cum ipso patre aequalitatem clamat atque asserit? Deinde, cum Paulus dicat Filium Dei esse Dei Sapientiam; et ipse Dominus, Nemo nobit Patrem, nisi uni genitus Filius, quid potuit a propheta congruentius dici, quam illud quod dictum est, Et tecum Sapientia quæ novil opera tua, quæ adfuit tunc cum orbem terrarum faceres, et sciebat quid placiturum esset oculis tuis? Quod autem Christus est veritas, quod idem ostenditur cum splendor Patris nuncupatur; non est enim quidquam in circuitu solis, nisi splendor ipse quem gignit I: quid ergo potuit apertius et clarius ex Vetere Testamento huic sententiæ consonare, quam illud quod dictum est, Veritas tua in circuitu tuo? Postremo dicit ipsa Sapientia in Evangelio, Nemo venit ad Patrem, nisi per me: dicit pro pheta, Sensum tuum ergo quis scit, nisi tu dcderis sa pientiam? et paulo' post, Et quat tibi placent, didicerunt homines, et per sapientiam sanati sunt. Dicit Paulus, Charitas Dei diffusa est in cordibus nostris per Spiritum sanctum qui datus est nobis: dicit propheta, Sanctus enim Spiritus disciplinæ effugiet dolum. Ubi cnim dolus, charitas nulla est. Dicit Paulus, Conformes fieri nos imaginis Filii Dei: dicit propheta, Signatum eat super nos lumen vultus tui, Domine.. Ostendit Paulus Deam esse Spiritum sanctum, et ideo non esse creaturam:dicit propheta, Et miseris. Spiritum sanctum de altissimis. Solus enim Deus altissimus, quo nihil est altius. Oatendit Paulus Trinitatem istam unum Deum esse, cum dicit, Ipsi gloria: dicitur in Vetcri Testa mento, Audi, Israel, Dominus Deus tuus, Deus unus est.
What manner of life follows from each of these virtues I will explain in a few words, once I have first set beside the testimonies of the New Testament, which I have been using for some time, matching ones from the Old as well, as I promised. Is it only Paul who says that we must be joined to God so that there is nothing between to separate us? Does not the prophet too express this most aptly and briefly when he says, “But for me it is good to cleave to God”? Is not what is said there at great length about love contained here in the one word “cleave”? And again, does not his addition, “it is good,” look back to what is set down there, “For those who love God all things work together for good”? So in one short sentence and two words the prophet shows both the force and the fruit of love. And since it is said there that the Son of God is the Power and Wisdom of God, and power is understood to belong to action, wisdom to teaching (which is why both are marked in the Gospel when it says, “All things were made through him,” for this belongs to action and power, and then, as concerns teaching and the knowledge of the truth, “And the life,” it says, “was the light of men”), could anything agree more with these testimonies of the New Testament than what is said of wisdom in the Old: “She reaches mightily from end to end, and orders all things sweetly”? For “reaching mightily” signifies rather power, while “ordering sweetly” signifies, as it were, skill itself and reason. But if this seems obscure, see what follows: “And the Lord of all,” it says, “loved her: for she is the teacher of the knowledge of God, and the chooser of his works.” Here nothing seems to be said of action; for choosing works is not the same as working: so these words belong to teaching; work is owed to power, so that the statement we wish to prove may be complete. Read, then, what is joined next. “And if,” it says, “a possession desired in life is honorable, what is more honorable than wisdom, which works all things?” Could anything more splendid, or plainer, or indeed richer be brought forward? Hear another text, if you think this too little, which says the same: “For wisdom teaches sobriety,” it says, “and justice and power.” Sobriety seems to me to belong to the knowledge of the truth itself, that is, to teaching; justice and power to action and working. And with these two, that is, effectiveness in acting and sobriety in contemplating, which the Power of God and the Wisdom of God, that is, the Son of God, gives to those who love him, I do not know what can be compared, since the same prophet at once says how highly they are to be valued; for it is set down thus: “For wisdom teaches sobriety and justice and power, than which nothing in life is more useful for human beings.”
Someone may perhaps think these things were not said of the Son of God. What else, then, is shown by the words, “She glorifies her noble birth, having fellowship with God”? Does noble birth usually mean anything other than parents? And does not fellowship proclaim and assert equality with the Father himself? Then, since Paul says that the Son of God is the Wisdom of God, and the Lord himself says, “No one knows the Father except the only-begotten Son,” what could the prophet have said more fittingly than what is said: “And with you is Wisdom, who knows your works, who was present when you made the world, and knew what would be pleasing in your eyes”? And as for Christ's being the truth, which is shown also when he is called the brightness of the Father (for there is nothing around the sun but the very brightness it begets), what could agree with this statement more openly and clearly from the Old Testament than the words, “Your truth is round about you”? Finally, Wisdom itself says in the Gospel, “No one comes to the Father except through me”; the prophet says, “Who then knows your mind, unless you give wisdom?” and a little later, “And men learned what pleases you, and were healed through wisdom.” Paul says, “The love of God has been poured out in our hearts through the Holy Spirit who has been given to us”; the prophet says, “For the Holy Spirit of discipline will flee deceit.” For where there is deceit there is no love. Paul says that we are “to be conformed to the image of the Son of God”; the prophet says, “The light of your countenance is sealed upon us, O Lord.” Paul shows that the Holy Spirit is God and therefore not a creature; the prophet says, “And you sent your Holy Spirit from the heights.” For God alone is the highest, than whom nothing is higher. Paul shows that this Trinity is one God when he says, “To him be glory”; it is said in the Old Testament, “Hear, O Israel, the Lord your God is one God.”
Ps 73:28 (72:28 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 8:28 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 1:24 (allusion, high confidence) · John 1:3–4 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 11:27 (quotation, high confidence) · Heb 1:3 (allusion, high confidence) · Ps 89:8 (88:9 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · John 14:6 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 5:5 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 8:29 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 4:6 (4:7 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 11:36 (quotation, high confidence) · Deut 6:4 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Augustine sets Old Testament texts, chiefly from Psalms and the Wisdom of Solomon, beside each New Testament text he has used on love, Christ as Power and Wisdom, the Holy Spirit, and the one God.
- Ps 73:28 (72:28 LXX/Vulg.); Rom 8:28; 1 Cor 1:24; John 1:3–4; Wis 8:1, 3–4, 7; Matt 11:27; Wis 9:9; Heb 1:3; Ps 89:8 (88:9 LXX/Vulg.); John 14:6; Wis 9:13, 18; Rom 5:5; Wis 1:5; Rom 8:29; Ps 4:6 (4:7 LXX/Vulg.); Wis 9:17; Rom 11:36; Deut 6:4. Augustine treats the Wisdom of Solomon as the words of “the prophet”.
- “and power”: Augustine's Latin of Wis 8:7 has virtutem where the Greek lists four virtues; he reads it as “power”. “The Lord of all … loved her” (Wis 8:3) follows his Latin.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne's paragraph number (18) leaked into the text): is. Haec fortasse → Haec fortasse.
Extrabiblical texts: Wis 8:1 (Wisdom of Solomon [in RC, EO, ETH canons]; quotation); Wis 8:3-4 (Wisdom of Solomon [in RC, EO, ETH canons]; quotation); Wis 8:5 (Wisdom of Solomon [in RC, EO, ETH canons]; quotation); Wis 8:7 (Wisdom of Solomon [in RC, EO, ETH canons]; quotation); Wis 9:9 (Wisdom of Solomon [in RC, EO, ETH canons]; quotation); Wis 9:17-18 (Wisdom of Solomon [in RC, EO, ETH canons]; quotation); Wis 1:5 (Wisdom of Solomon [in RC, EO, ETH canons]; quotation)
Topics: Scripture and canon, Christology, Trinity
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Mor. 1.16 (PL 32:1321–1323; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-moribus/1-12/#p-1-16). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-moribus-1-16) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text of the Open Greek and Latin project); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of R. Stothert in NPNF¹ 4 (1887).
1.17PL 32:1323–1325
Quid vultis amplius? quid imperite atque impie saevitis? quid indoctas animas noxia suasione perver titis Utriusque Testamenti Deus unus est. Nam ut ista sibi congruunt, quae de utroque posuimus; ita etiam caetera, si diligenter et æquo judicio velitis at tendere. Sed quia multa dicuntur submissius, et humi repentibus animis accommodatius, ut per humana in divina consurgant; multa etiam figurate ut studiosa mens, et quaesitis exerceatur utilius, ct uberius læte tur inventis; vos mirifica dispositione Spiritus sancti, ad decipiendos vestros auditores et illaqueandos ab utimini. Quod ipsum cur divina providentia vos facere sinat, quamque verissime Apostolus dixerit, Oportet multas hæreses esse, ut probati manifesti fiant inter vos ( 1 Cor. X!, 19); ct longum est disputare, et, quod dicendum est vobis, non est vestrum ista intelligere. Non parum mihi cogniti estis. Crassas omnino mentes et corporeorum simulacrorum pestifero pastu morbi das ad divina judicanda defertis, quae multo altiora sunt quam putatis. Quare vobiscum modo sic agendum est, non ut ea jam intelligatis, quod fieri non potest; sed ut in telligere aliquando cupiatis. Facit enim hoc simplex et pura charitas Dei, quæ maxitne spectatur in mori bus, de qua multa jam diximus: quae inspirata Spi ritu sancto perducit ad Filium, id est, ad Sapientiam Dei, per quam Pater ipse cognoscitur. Nam si sa pientia et veritas non toMis animi viribus concupisca tur, inveniri nullo pacto potest. At si tila quæratur, ut dignum est, subtrahere sese atque abscondere a suis dilectoribus non potest. Hinc cst illud, quod in ore habere eliam vos soletis, quod ait: Petite, et ac cipietis; quærite, et invenietis; pulsate, et aperietur vobis. Nil est occultum, quod non rere labitur. Amore petitur, ainore quæritur, amore pulsatur, amore revelatur, amore denique in eo quod revelatum fuerit permanetur. Ab hoc amore sapientiæ diligentiaque quærendi, non deterremur Veteri Testamento, quod semper mendacissimc dici lis, sed ad hæc vehementissime concitamur. Audite itaque aliquando, et advertite, quæso, sine pertinacia quid per prophetam dicatur: Clara est, inquit, et quæ nunquam marcescat sapientia, et facile videTur ab iis qui diligunt illam, et invenitur ab iia qui quaerunt illam: præoccupat qui se concupiscunt, ut illis se ostendat. Qui vigilaverit ad illam, non labo rabit: assidentem enim illam inveniet foribus suis Cogilarc cnim de illa, sensus cat consummatus; et qui vigilaverit propter illam, cito erit securus: quia dignes seipsa circuit quœrens, et in viis ostendit scillis hilari terf et omni providentia occurrit illis. Initium enim illius verissimum disciplinæ concupiscentia est. Cura crgo disciplinæ dilectio est; et dilectio custoditio legum illius est: custoditio autem legum, confirmatio incorru ptionis est incorruptio autem facit proximum Deo. Con cupiscentia itaque sapientiæ deducit ad regnum. Itane tandem adhuc adversum ista latrabitis? Nonne ita posita et nondum intellecta, cuivis signifi cant altum se quiddam et ineffabile continere? 0 uti. nam possetis intelligere quae dicta sunt! Confestim abjicerctis omnesineptias fabellarum, et vanissimas imaginationes corporum, tutosque vos magna alacri tate, sincero amore, firmissima fide, sanctissimo Ecclesiæ catholicæ gremio conderetis.
What more do you want? Why do you rage so ignorantly and impiously? Why do you pervert untaught souls by harmful persuasion? The God of both Testaments is one. For as these passages which we have set down from each agree with one another, so do the rest, if you are willing to consider them carefully and with fair judgment. But because many things are said in a humbler way, more suited to minds that creep on the ground, so that they may rise through human things to divine, and many things are said figuratively, so that the eager mind may be exercised more profitably by searching and rejoice more richly in finding, you abuse this wonderful arrangement of the Holy Spirit to deceive and ensnare your hearers. Why divine providence allows you to do this, and how very truly the Apostle said, “There must be many heresies, so that those who are approved may be made manifest among you,” would take long to discuss, and, I must tell you, it is not for you to understand these things. I know you well enough. You bring minds altogether gross, and sick from the poisonous diet of bodily images, to judge divine things, which are far higher than you think. So with you the way to proceed now is not that you should already understand them, which cannot be, but that you should someday desire to understand. For this is done by the simple and pure love of God, which is seen most of all in conduct, of which we have already said much: a love which, breathed in by the Holy Spirit, leads to the Son, that is, to the Wisdom of God, through whom the Father himself is known. For if wisdom and truth are not desired with all the strength of the mind, they cannot be found at all. But if they are sought as they deserve, they cannot withdraw and hide themselves from those who love them. Hence that saying which you too are accustomed to have on your lips: “Ask, and you will receive; seek, and you will find; knock, and it will be opened to you. Nothing is hidden that will not be revealed.” By love one asks, by love one seeks, by love one knocks, by love it is revealed, and by love, finally, one abides in what has been revealed. From this love of wisdom and diligence in seeking we are not deterred by the Old Testament, as you always most falsely say, but are most vehemently spurred on to them. So listen at last, and consider, I beg you, without obstinacy what is said by the prophet: “Wisdom is radiant,” he says, “and never fades, and is easily seen by those who love her, and is found by those who seek her: she goes before those who desire her, to show herself to them. Whoever keeps watch for her will not toil, for he will find her sitting at his doors. For to think of her is perfect understanding, and whoever keeps watch for her sake will soon be free from care: for she goes about seeking those worthy of her, and shows herself to them cheerfully in the ways, and meets them with all providence. For her truest beginning is the desire for discipline. The care of discipline, then, is love; and love is the keeping of her laws; and the keeping of the laws is the confirmation of incorruption; and incorruption makes one near to God. So the desire for wisdom leads to the kingdom.” Will you still bark against these things? Do they not, set down thus and not yet understood, show anyone that they contain something deep and ineffable? Oh, if only you could understand what has been said! At once you would throw away all the nonsense of your fables and the empty imaginings of bodies, and with great eagerness, sincere love, and firmest faith you would hide yourselves safe in the most holy bosom of the catholic Church.
1 Cor 11:19 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 7:7 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 10:26 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The God of both Testaments is one; the Manichaeans misuse Scripture's humble and figurative language, while true understanding comes through love, as Christ's “ask, seek, knock” and the Wisdom of Solomon both teach.
- 1 Cor 11:19; Matt 7:7; Matt 10:26; Wis 6:12–20 (6:13–21 Vulg.).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (footnote digit attached to a word; footnote digit in the text): consurgant1; → consurgant;; esse 2, ut → esse, ut.
Extrabiblical texts: Wis 6:12-20 (Wisdom of Solomon [in RC, EO, ETH canons]; quotation)
Topics: Scripture and canon, Heresy
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Mor. 1.17 (PL 32:1323–1325; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-moribus/1-12/#p-1-17). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-moribus-1-17) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text of the Open Greek and Latin project); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of R. Stothert in NPNF¹ 4 (1887).
1.18PL 32:1325
Poteram pro mea mediocritate discutere sin gula, et eruere ac demonstrare quæ accepi, in quo rum excellentia et altitudine plerumque verba defi ciunt: sed quamdiulatratis, non cst facicpdum. Non enim frustra dictujn cst, Nolite sanctum dare canibus. Nc succenseatis. Et ego latravi et canis fui, quando mecum jure pon docendi cibo, sed re. fellendi fustibus1 agebatur. Si autcm in vobis esset charitas, de qua nunc agitur, vel cHaM si fucrit ali quando, quantam cognoscendæ veritatis magnitodo desideral, aderit.Deus qui ostondat vpbis ncque apud Manichæos essc christianam fidem, quae ad summum apicem sapientiae veritatisque perducit, qua perfrui, nihil est aliud nisi beate vivere; neque esse uspiam, nisi in catbolica disciplina. Quid enim aliud videfur apostolus Paulus optare,cum dicit: Hujus rei gratia flecto genua mea ad Patrem Domini nostri Jesu Christi, a quo omnis paternitas in coelis et in terra nominatur, ut det vobis secundum divitias gloriæ suæ forititudinem, corroborari per spiritum in interiori homine, habitare Christum per fidem in cordibus vestris: ut in charitate radicati et fundati, possitis comprehendere cum omnibus sanctis, quæ ait altitudo, et longitudo, et latitudo, et profundum; cognoscere etiam super eminentem scientiæ charitatem Christi, ut impleamini in omnem plenitu dinem Dei? (Ephes. in, 14 -19.) Potestue quidquam dici manifestius? Obsecro, vigilate paululum, videte Testamenti utriusque concordiam, qui sit in moribus vitæ modus, ct quo sint referenda omnia, satis aperientem et do-..centem. Amorem Dei concitant Evangelia, cum dici tur, Petite, quærite, pulsate: concitat Paulus, dicendo, Ut in charitate radicati et fundati pos sitis comprehendere (Ephes it!, 17): concitat etiam pro pheta, cum dicit, facile sapientiam ab iis qui eam 4iligunt, quærunt, concupiscunt,vigilant, cogitant, curant, posse cognosci. Salus animi ct via bcatitudinis utra rumque Scripturarum pace monstratur, et vos latrare potius adversus hæc, quam his obtemperare diligitis. Brevi dicam quod sentio: audite doctos Ecclesiæ ca tholicæ viros tanta pace animi,ot eo voto quo vos ego audivi; nihil opus erit novem annis quibus me ludi ficastis. Longe omnino, longe breviore tem pore, quid intersit inter veritatem vanitatemque cernetis. «
I could, according to my modest ability, discuss each point, and draw out and show what I have received, things whose excellence and depth words for the most part fail to reach; but as long as you bark, it must not be done. For it was not said in vain, “Do not give what is holy to dogs.” Do not be angry. I too barked and was a dog, when I was rightly dealt with not with the food of teaching but with the cudgels of refutation. But if there were in you the love that we are now discussing, or even if it is there someday, as much as the greatness of knowing the truth requires, God will be present to show you that the Christian faith, which leads to the highest summit of wisdom and truth, to enjoy which is nothing else than to live happily, is neither among the Manichaeans nor anywhere except in the catholic teaching. For what else does the apostle Paul seem to wish, when he says: “For this reason I bend my knees to the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, from whom every fatherhood in heaven and on earth is named, that he may grant you according to the riches of his glory strength, to be strengthened through the Spirit in the inner man, that Christ may dwell through faith in your hearts; that, being rooted and grounded in love, you may be able to comprehend with all the saints what is the height and length and breadth and depth, to know also the love of Christ that surpasses knowledge, that you may be filled with all the fullness of God”? Can anything be said more plainly? I beg you, wake up a little, see the harmony of both Testaments, which shows and teaches clearly enough what the manner of life in conduct is, and to what all things are to be referred. The Gospels stir up the love of God when it is said, “Ask, seek, knock”; Paul stirs it up by saying, “That, being rooted and grounded in love, you may be able to comprehend”; the prophet stirs it up too when he says that wisdom can easily be known by those who love her, seek her, desire her, keep watch for her, think of her, care for her. The health of the soul and the way of happiness are shown by the concord of both Scriptures; and you prefer to bark against these things rather than to obey them. I will say briefly what I think: listen to the learned men of the catholic Church with as much peace of mind and with the same wish with which I listened to you; there will be no need of the nine years in which you made a fool of me. In far, far shorter time you will see the difference between truth and emptiness.
Matt 7:6 (quotation, high confidence) · Eph 3:14–19 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 7:7 (quotation, high confidence) · Eph 3:17 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Augustine, once a Manichaean hearer himself, urges them to see the harmony of both Testaments in stirring up the love of God, and to listen to catholic teachers as he once listened to them for nine years.
- Matt 7:6; Eph 3:14–19; Matt 7:7; Eph 3:17; the prophet is Wis 6:12–20 (cf. 1.17).
- “nine years”: Augustine's years as a Manichaean hearer (cf. Confessions 4.1).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (footnote digit in the text): Christi 2, ut → Christi, ut; Dei 3 concitant → Dei concitant.
Extrabiblical texts: Wis 6:12-20 (Wisdom of Solomon [in RC, EO, ETH canons]; allusion)
Topics: Heresy, Scripture and canon
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Mor. 1.18 (PL 32:1325; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-moribus/1-12/#p-1-18). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-moribus-1-18) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text of the Open Greek and Latin project); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of R. Stothert in NPNF¹ 4 (1887).
1.19PL 32:1325–1327
Sed tempus est ad illas virtulcsquatuor reverti, et ex bis siugulis eruere ac ducere vivendi modum. Itaque prius temperantiam videamus, quæ nobis amo ris illius quo innectimur Deo, integritatem quamdam et incorruptionem pollicetur. Munus enim ejus est in coercendis sedandisque cupiditatibus, quibus inhiamus in ea quæ nos avertunt a legibus Dei et a fryctu bo nitatis ejus: quod cst, ut Irevi explicem, beata vita. Dii enim est sedes veritatis 1, cujus contemplatione perfrucnies, cique penitus adhærentes, procul dubio beati sumus: inde autem,decidentes, maguis errori bus doloribusque implicantur. Namque, ut ait Apo stolus, radix omnium malorum cupiditas, quam quidam sequentes, naufragaverunt a fide, et inseruerunt se do loribus multis. Quod peccatum anima; in Veteri Testamento satis aperte, bene intelligentihus, it.. ipsius homiuis qui crat in paradiso, prævari catione signatur. In Adam quippe omnes morimur, ut ait idc;n, et in Christo omnes resurgemus. 0 alta mysteria! Sed reprimam me: non enim modo suscepi docere vos recta, sed dedocere prava,. sipotero, id est, si Deus anaucrit proposito in vos inco. Dicit ergo Paulus radicem omnium malorum csse cupiditatem, pcr quam eliam Lex '.ctus primum luyuiucin lapsum esse significat. Monet Paulus ut exuamus nos veterem homincm, ct induamus no vum. luIt autem intelligi, Adam qui peccavit, veterem ijomincm; illum autem qucm suscepit in sacramento Dei Filius ad nos liberandos, novum. Dicit namque alio loco, Primus homo de terra, terrenus; socundus homo de cœlo, cœlestis. Qualis ter renus, tales et terreni; qualis cœlestis, tales et cœlestes. Sicut portavimus imaginem terreni, portemus et imagi tiem cœlestis: hoc cst, exuite ve tercm, ct induite novum. Omne igitur officium tem perantiæ, est exuere veterem hominem, et iii Deo renovari; id est, contemnere omnes corporeas ille cebras, laudemque popularem. totumque amorem ad invisibilia ct divina conferre. Unde illud sequitur quod mirifice dictum cst, Si et exterior homo noster corrumpitur, scd interior renovatur de die in dicm (ti Cor. IV, 16). Audi ct prophetam canentem, Cor mundum crea in me, Deus, et spiritum rectum innova in visceribus meis. Quid contra istam convenientiam dici, nisi a cæcis latratoribus po test?
But it is time to return to those four virtues, and to draw out and derive from each of them the manner of living. So let us first look at temperance, which promises us a certain wholeness and incorruption of that love by which we are bound to God. Its office is to restrain and calm the desires by which we gape after the things that turn us away from the laws of God and from the fruit of his goodness, which is, to put it briefly, the happy life. For there is the seat of truth; enjoying the contemplation of it and cleaving to it closely, we are beyond doubt happy; but those who fall away from it are entangled in great errors and sorrows. For, as the Apostle says, “the root of all evils is greed, which some have followed and made shipwreck of the faith, and have pierced themselves with many sorrows.” And this sin of the soul is quite plainly signified in the Old Testament, for those who understand rightly, by the transgression of the very man who was in paradise. “For in Adam we all die,” as the same Apostle says, “and in Christ we shall all rise again.” O deep mysteries! But I will restrain myself: for I have undertaken not to teach you what is right now, but to unteach you what is wrong, if I can, that is, if God favors my purpose toward you. Paul, then, says that the root of all evils is greed, through which the old Law also shows that the first man fell. Paul exhorts us to strip off the old man and put on the new. By the old man he wants us to understand Adam who sinned; by the new, the one whom the Son of God took on in the mystery for our deliverance. For he says in another place, “The first man was from the earth, earthly; the second man from heaven, heavenly. As was the earthly, so are those who are earthly; and as is the heavenly, so are those who are heavenly. As we have borne the image of the earthly, let us also bear the image of the heavenly”; that is, strip off the old and put on the new. The whole office of temperance, then, is to strip off the old man and be renewed in God; that is, to despise all bodily allurements and popular praise, and to turn all our love to invisible and divine things. Hence follows that wonderful saying, “Though our outer man is wasting away, yet the inner is being renewed day by day.” Hear also the prophet singing, “Create a clean heart in me, O God, and renew a right spirit within me.” What can be said against this agreement except by blind barkers?
1 Tim 6:10 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:22 (quotation, high confidence) · Col 3:9–10 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:47–49 (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Cor 4:16 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 51:10 (50:12 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 3:6 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Temperance restrains the desires that turn us from God; it means stripping off the old man, Adam, and putting on the new, as both Paul and the Psalms teach.
- 1 Tim 6:10; 1 Cor 15:22; Col 3:9–10; 1 Cor 15:47–49; 2 Cor 4:16; Ps 51:10 (50:12 LXX/Vulg.).
- “greed”: cupiditas, Augustine's Latin of 1 Tim 6:10 (φιλαργυρία), which he takes in the wider sense of disordered desire.
Topics: Ethics
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Mor. 1.19 (PL 32:1325–1327; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-moribus/1-12/#p-1-19). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-moribus-1-19) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text of the Open Greek and Latin project); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of R. Stothert in NPNF¹ 4 (1887).
1.20PL 32:1327
illecebrae autem corporis sitæ sunt in his omni has quæ corporcus sensus attingit, quæ a nonnullis etiam sensibilia nominantur: in quibus maxime lux ista vulgaris excellit, quia et in ipsis sensibus nostris, quibus anima per corpus utitur, nihil est oculis pratfe rendum; et ideo in Scripturis sanctis, visibilium no mine sensibilia cuncta significantur 1. Itaque in Novo Testamento sic ab istorum amore prohibemur: Non respicientes, inquit, quæ videntur, sed quos non videntur. Quæ enim videntur, temporalia sunt: quæ autem non videntur, æterna. Ex quo intelligi po test, quam christiani non sint qui solcm et lunam non modo diligendos, sed etiam colendos putant. Quid enim videmus, si solem et lunam non videmus? Ve titi autem sumus converti ad ea quae videntur. Non sunt igitur etiam ista diligenda ei qui amorem illum incorruptum Dco cogitat exhibcre. Sed erit milii alius locus quo de istis diligentius requirctur. Non cnim nunc de fide, sed de vita dicerc institui, per qnam meremur scire quod credimus. Amandus igitur solus Deus est: omnis vcro iste mundus, id est, omnia f ensibilia contemnenda; utendum autcm his ad hu jus vitæ necessitatem.
The allurements of the body lie in all those things that the bodily sense touches, which some also call sensible things; among them this common light is most prominent, because among our senses, too, which the soul uses through the body, nothing is to be preferred to the eyes; and therefore in the holy Scriptures all sensible things are signified by the name of visible things. So in the New Testament we are forbidden to love them in this way: “Not looking,” he says, “at the things that are seen, but at those that are not seen. For the things that are seen are temporal, but those that are not seen are eternal.” From this it can be understood how far from Christian are those who think that the sun and moon are not only to be loved but even worshiped. For what do we see, if we do not see the sun and moon? But we are forbidden to turn to the things that are seen. So these too must not be loved by one who intends to offer that incorrupt love to God. But I will have another place to inquire into these things more carefully. For I have set out to speak now not of faith but of life, through which we deserve to know what we believe. God alone, then, is to be loved; and this whole world, that is, all sensible things, is to be despised, though they are to be used for the needs of this life.
2 Cor 4:18 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Temperance turns love away from visible things, so the Manichaean worship of the sun and moon is not Christian; God alone is to be loved, and the world only used for life's needs.
- 2 Cor 4:18. The Manichaeans venerated the sun and moon as vessels of light.
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Mor. 1.20 (PL 32:1327; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-moribus/1-12/#p-1-20). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-moribus-1-20) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text of the Open Greek and Latin project); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of R. Stothert in NPNF¹ 4 (1887).
1.21PL 32:1327
Gloria vcro popularis sic in Novo Testamento abjicitur atque contemnitur: Si hominibus, inquit, placere vellem, Christi servus non essem. Est item aliud quod de corporibus per imaginationes I quasdam concipit anima, et eam vocat rerum scien tiam. Quamobrem recte etiam curiosi esse prohibe mur, quod magnum temperantiac munus est. Hinc illud est: Cavete ne quis vos seducat per philosophiam. Et quia ipsum nomen philosophiæ si consideretur, rcm magnam totoque• animo appetendam significat, siquidem philosophia est amor studiumque sapientiæ, c: utissime Apostolus, ne ab amore sapientiae deterrere videretur, subjecit, et elementa hujus mundi. Sunt cnim qui desertis virtutibus, et nescientes quid sit Deus, et quanta majestas semper codem modo manentis naturæ, magnum aliquid se agere putant, si universam istam corporis molem, quam mundum nuncupamus, curiosissime intentissimeque perqui rant. Unde tanta etiam superbia gignitur, ut in ipso cœlo, de quo saepe disputant, sibimet habitare vi deantur. Reprimat igitur sc aniina ab hujusmodi vanae cognitionis cupiditatc4, si se castam Dco servare disposuit. Tali enim amore plerumque decipitur, ut aut nihil putct esse, nisi corpus; aut etiamsi audo ritate commota, fateatur aliquid esse incorporeum, de illo tamen nisi per imagines corporcas cogitare non possit, et tale aliquid esse credere, quale fallax corporis sensus infligit. Ad hoc ctiam valet quod pra cipitur cavendum esse a simulacris. Huic ergo auctoritati Novi Testamenti, qua ju - bemur nihil mundi hujus diligere, illa maxime sententia qua dictum ea, Nolite conformari huic mundo (Rom. xu, 2): simul cnim demonstran dum est ei rei qucmquc conformari qnam diligit: huic ergo auctoritati, si de Veteri Testamento quaeram quid comparem, plura quidem invenio: sed unus Sa lomonis liber, Ecclesiastes qui dicilur, copiosissime in summum contemptum omnia ista perducit. Incipit enim sic: Vanitas vanitantium, dixit Ecclesiastes, vanitas vanitantium, et omnia vanitas. Quæ abundantia homini in omni labore suo, quem ipse laborat sub sole? Haec verba omnia si attendantur, si perpendantur, si discutiantur, multa inveniuntur pernecessaria iis qui hunc mundum fugere, et refugere iii Deum desiderant: sed longum est, et alio festinat oratio. Tali tamen principio constituto, exsequitur omnia, vanitantes esse eos qui rebus hujusmodi fal luntur; idipsum autem quo falluntur vanitatem vo cans, non quod Deus ista non creaverit, scd quia subjicere se homines volunt iis rebus per peccata, quæ illis per recte f..cta divina lege subjectæ sunt. Quid cst cnim aliud, falsis bonis illudi atque decipi, quam teipso inferiora, miranda et appetenda arbi trari? Habet igitur vir temperans in hujuscemodi re bus mortalibus et fluentibus, vitæ regulam utroque Testamento firmatam; ut eorum nihil diligat, nihil per se appetendum putet, sed ad vitæ hujus atque officiorum necessitatem quantum sat est, usurpet, utentis modestia, non amantis affectu. Hæc dicta sint de temperantia, pro rerum magnitudine breviter; pro instituto tamen opere fortasse copiosius qnam oportebat.
Popular glory is thus rejected and despised in the New Testament: “If I wished to please men,” he says, “I would not be a servant of Christ.” There is also something else which the soul conceives about bodies through certain images, and calls the knowledge of things. Hence we are rightly forbidden also to be curious, and that is a great office of temperance. Hence the saying: “Beware lest anyone lead you astray through philosophy.” And because the very name of philosophy, if one considers it, signifies a great thing and one to be sought with the whole mind, since philosophy is the love and pursuit of wisdom, the Apostle very carefully, so as not to seem to deter us from the love of wisdom, added, “and the elements of this world.” For there are some who, abandoning the virtues, and not knowing what God is, and how great is the majesty of the nature that remains always the same, think they are doing something great if they investigate with the greatest curiosity and intensity this whole bodily mass which we call the world. From this, too, such pride is born that they seem to themselves to dwell in the very heaven about which they often dispute. Let the soul, then, restrain itself from the desire for this kind of empty knowledge, if it has resolved to keep itself chaste for God. For by such a love it is generally deceived, so that it either thinks nothing exists but body, or, even if moved by authority it admits that something incorporeal exists, it still cannot think of it except through bodily images, and believes it to be such as the deceptive sense of the body imposes. To this also applies the command to beware of idols.
To this authority of the New Testament, then, by which we are commanded to love nothing of this world, especially in the statement where it is said, “Do not be conformed to this world” (for at the same time it is to be shown that each person is conformed to the thing he loves), to this authority, then, if I ask what I may compare from the Old Testament, I find many things indeed; but one book of Solomon, called Ecclesiastes, brings all these things into utter contempt at very great length. For it begins thus: “Vanity of the vain, said the Preacher, vanity of the vain, and all is vanity. What gain has a man in all his labor which he labors under the sun?” If all these words are attended to, weighed, and examined, many things are found very necessary for those who desire to flee this world and take refuge in God; but it is a long task, and my discourse hastens elsewhere. Yet with this beginning laid down, he goes through everything to show that those who are deceived by such things are the vain, calling the very thing by which they are deceived vanity; not that God did not create these things, but because by their sins human beings choose to subject themselves to things which by the divine law are subject to them when they act rightly. For what else is it to be mocked and deceived by false goods than to think things inferior to yourself worth admiring and desiring? The temperate man, then, has in such mortal and fleeting things a rule of life confirmed by both Testaments: to love none of them, to think none of them desirable for its own sake, but to take of them as much as suffices for the needs of this life and its duties, with the moderation of one who uses, not the affection of one who loves. Let this be said of temperance, briefly for the greatness of the subject, but perhaps at more length than was fitting for the work undertaken.
Gal 1:10 (quotation, high confidence) · Col 2:8 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 John 5:21 (allusion, medium confidence) · 1 John 2:15 (allusion, medium confidence) · Rom 12:2 (quotation, high confidence) · Eccl 1:2–3 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Temperance also despises popular glory and curious, prideful study of the physical world; the New Testament forbids love of the world, and Ecclesiastes declares all such things vanity, to be used, not loved.
- Gal 1:10; Col 2:8; “beware of idols”: 1 John 5:21 (Migne refers to 1 John 2:15); Rom 12:2; Eccl 1:2–3.
Topics: Ethics, Scripture and canon
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Mor. 1.21 (PL 32:1327; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-moribus/1-12/#p-1-21). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-moribus-1-21) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text of the Open Greek and Latin project); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of R. Stothert in NPNF¹ 4 (1887).
1.22PL 32:1327–1329
De fortitudine vero non multa dicenda suut. Amor namque ille de quo loquimur, quem tota san ctitate inflammatum esse oportet in Dcum, in non appetendis istis temperans, in amittendis tortis voca lue. Sed inter omnia quae in hac vita possidentur, corpus homini gravissimum vinculum est, justissimis Dei legibus, propter antiquum peccatum, quo nihil est ad prædicandum notius, nihil ad intelligendum secretius. Iloc ergo vinculum nc concutiatur atque vexetur, laboris et duloris; ne aufcralur atque per imatur, mortis terrotc animam quatit. Amat enim illud vi consuetudinis, non intelligens, si eo bene atque scienter utatur, resurrectionem reformationemque ejus ope ac lege divina sine ulla molestia juri suo subditam fore: sed cum se hoc amore tota in Deum converterit 1, his cognitis mortem non modo conto, mnet, vcrum etiam dcsidcrabil. Sed restat cum dolore magna conflictio. Nihil est tamen lam durmn atque ferreum, quod non amo ris igne vincatur. Quo cum se anima rapiet in Deum, super omnem carnificinam liber:?, et admiranda voli tabit pennis pulcherrimis et integerrimis, quibus ad Dei amplexum amor castus innititur. Nisi vero ama tores auri, amatores laudis, amatores feminarum, amatoribus suis Deus sinet esse fortiores; cum ille non amor, sed congruentius cupiditas vel libido no minetur. In qua tamen apparet quantus sit impetus antimi ad ca quæ diliguntur indefesso cursu I per im* mania quæque tendentis, argumentoque nobis est, quam sint omnia perferenda, nc deseramus Deum, si lania illi ut descrant, perferunt. »
Not much needs to be said about fortitude. For that love of which we speak, which must be set on fire toward God with all holiness, is called temperance in not desiring these things, fortitude in losing them. But among all the things possessed in this life, the body is the heaviest bond for a human being, by the most just laws of God, on account of the ancient sin, than which nothing is better known for preaching and nothing more hidden for understanding. This bond, lest it be shaken and harassed, disturbs the soul with the fear of toil and pain; lest it be taken away and destroyed, with the fear of death. For the soul loves it by force of habit, not understanding that, if it uses it well and wisely, its resurrection and renewal will, by divine power and law, be subject to its rule without any trouble. But when the soul turns wholly to God with this love, knowing these things, it will not only despise death but even desire it. Yet a great struggle with pain remains. But nothing is so hard and iron that it is not conquered by the fire of love. When the soul is carried away by it to God, it will fly free above every torture, on wondrous wings, most beautiful and unimpaired, on which chaste love rises to the embrace of God. Unless indeed God will allow lovers of gold, lovers of praise, lovers of women, to be braver than those who love him, though that is not love but would more fittingly be called desire or lust. Yet in it one sees how great is the drive of the mind, pressing with untiring course through every enormity toward the things it loves; and it is a proof to us how much must be borne so as not to desert God, if such men bear so much to desert him.
Notes and citation
Summary: Fortitude is love bearing the loss of all things, including pain and death, which the soul fears because of its attachment to the body; if lovers of gold and pleasure endure so much, lovers of God should endure more.
Topics: Ethics
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Mor. 1.22 (PL 32:1327–1329; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-moribus/1-12/#p-1-22). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-moribus-1-22) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina (digital text of the Open Greek and Latin project); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of R. Stothert in NPNF¹ 4 (1887).