Questions on the Old and New Testament 83.1–90.1
Authorship disputed: Transmitted under Augustine's name (Pseudo-Augustine); since the 1900s generally ascribed to the same unknown author as the commentary on Paul called Ambrosiaster.
Latin text: CSEL 50 (Latin text: CSEL 50, digitized by Open Greek and Latin (csel-dev, University of Leipzig), CC BY-SA 4.0).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0).
Chapter 83
83.1CSEL 50:140
Nulli misericordiam facienti calumniam fieri oportet. in potestate enim dantis est, quando uel quantum uelit misereri. exhortandus est enim huius modi et precibus prouocandus. non contentione a bono opere reuocandus. forte non contradiceretur, si pro hac misericordia uices illi aliqua redderetur. aliquis medicum arguat, qui medicamenta sua et officium gratis inpendet, aut accusabitur tarditas eius ab eis, a quibusnon est requisitus?
No one who shows mercy ought to be slandered. For it is in the power of the giver when and how much he wishes to show mercy. Such a one should be encouraged and called forth by prayers, not called back from a good work by contention. Perhaps there would be no objection if some return were made to him for this mercy. Would anyone blame a physician who spends his medicines and his service free of charge, or will his slowness be accused by those by whom he was not sought?
Notes and citation
Summary: No one may complain against a benefactor about when or how much he chooses to give.
- The question asks why, if salvation and true knowledge come through Christ, he did not come earlier, so that those before him might learn the truth.
Cite (SBL): Ambrosiaster, Quaest. 83.1 (CSEL 50:140; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/ambrosiaster-quaestiones/83-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/ambrosiaster-quaestiones/83-1
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ambrosiaster-quaestiones-83-1) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin (Souter, CSEL 50, 1908); re-read against the Latin, since no public-domain English exists.
83.2CSEL 50:140–141
Haec quidem diximus secundum rationem, sed saluatoris bonitas ista non curat propter inbecillitatem humanam; suam enim sequitur naturam ad faciendam misericordiam. idcirco tunc uenit, quando debuit uenire, uoluntatis suae rationem secutus, non meritorum nostrorum. nam si merita perpendas, uenire non debuit. uenit ergo quando et subueniri debere sciuit et futurum gratum beneficium. si enim ei cui necessitas inminet ante subueniatur, erit quidem gratum, non tamen ualde poterit scire quid sibi praestitum est;si autem in ipsa necessitate posito auxilium feras, sciet quale beneficium consecutus sit. de tribulatione enim ereptus maiores gratias referet, quo modo si esurienti offeras panem; si autem offeras cum non esurit, non utique tam gratum erit.
These things we have said according to reason; but the Savior’s goodness does not take account of them, because of human weakness, for he follows his own nature in showing mercy. Therefore he came when he ought to come, following the reason of his own will, not of our merits. For if you weigh merits, he ought not to have come. He came, then, when he knew both that help ought to be given and that the benefit would be welcome. For if someone threatened by need is helped beforehand, it will indeed be welcome, yet he will not be able to know well what has been granted him; but if you bring help to one already placed in the need, he will know what kind of benefit he has obtained. For one rescued from tribulation will return greater thanks, just as when you offer bread to someone hungry; but if you offer it when he is not hungry, it will certainly not be as welcome.
Notes and citation
Summary: Christ came not by our merits but when help was needed and would be most gratefully received.
Topics: Christology
Cite (SBL): Ambrosiaster, Quaest. 83.2 (CSEL 50:140–141; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/ambrosiaster-quaestiones/83-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/ambrosiaster-quaestiones/83-2
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ambrosiaster-quaestiones-83-2) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin (Souter, CSEL 50, 1908); re-read against the Latin, since no public-domain English exists.
83.3CSEL 50:141
Idcirco recte factum est, ut non ante ueniret dominus. primum enim dimisit genus hominum uti uoluntate sua, non sine testimonio sui, quia ex ipsa mundi fabrica et annua munera, quae elementorum ministerio humanis usibus exhiberi decreuit, intellegi et timeri diuinitatem suam uoluit, quippe cum etiam ex traduce primi hominis, deinde Enoch, Noe, notitia eius esset in terris. sed cum languore quodam humani generis obsolescere coepisset cognitio dei inter homines et mores inmutarentur, eligere dignatus est Abraham, in quo forma esset renouatae notitiae dei et morum. et cum adhuc reuerentia segnior esset, postea per Moysen legem litteris dedit, quae neque obsolesceret et magis metum incuteret. maior enim timor est, ubi auctoritas manifesta est. et quia accepta lege gentes spreuerunt non se subicientes ei neque hi qui acceperunt seruauerunt eam, motus dominus misericordia misit filium suum, qui se pro illis offerens et mortem destruens data omnibus remissione peccatorum deo patri illos iustificatos offerret non enim posset descendi ad inferos, nisi per mortem. nec ordo enim nec ratio poscebat eum, qui mortuus non fuisset, intrare ianuas tartari.
Therefore it was rightly done that the Lord did not come earlier. For first he let the human race use its own will, not without witness to himself, since he willed his divinity to be understood and feared from the very fabric of the world and from the yearly gifts which he decreed to be presented for human use through the ministry of the elements; and indeed knowledge of him was also on earth by descent from the first man, then through Enoch and Noah. But when, through a certain languor of the human race, the knowledge of God among men had begun to grow obsolete and morals were changing, he deigned to choose Abraham, in whom there would be a pattern of renewed knowledge of God and of morals. And when reverence was still sluggish, he afterward gave the law in writing through Moses, so that it would not grow obsolete and would strike more fear. For fear is greater where authority is manifest. And because, once the law had been received, the nations spurned it, not submitting to it, and those who received it did not keep it, the Lord, moved by mercy, sent his Son, who, offering himself for them and destroying death, with forgiveness of sins given to all, might present them justified to God the Father. For he could not descend to the underworld except through death; neither order nor reason required that one who had not died should enter the gates of Tartarus.
Acts 14:17 (allusion, medium confidence) · Rom 1:20 (allusion, medium confidence) · Gal 4:4 (echo, low confidence) · Heb 2:14 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: God first left humanity to its will with the witness of creation, then chose Abraham, then gave the written law, and finally, when all had failed, sent his Son to die and descend to the underworld.
- Acts 14:17 (“not without witness”) and Rom 1:20 are echoed.
Topics: Christology
Cite (SBL): Ambrosiaster, Quaest. 83.3 (CSEL 50:141; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/ambrosiaster-quaestiones/83-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/ambrosiaster-quaestiones/83-3
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ambrosiaster-quaestiones-83-3) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin (Souter, CSEL 50, 1908); re-read against the Latin, since no public-domain English exists.
83.4CSEL 50:141–142
Nonne si quis uult in terra sua barbaros decipere, inmutat se in habitu illorum, ut putetur unus ex his, et sic explorat quo modo illos subuertat? ita factum est et diabolo. quoniam malo more hominem subuerterat. ut in morte remaneret, inuentum est remedium, quo modo quos male tenebat amitteret. ut subintraretur ei et, quem putabat se uelut hominem occidisse, repperiret illum apud inferos deum. quo facto reus inuentusomnes quos tenebat amisit et de cetero aperta est ad caelum uia.
If someone wishes to deceive barbarians in their own land, does he not change into their dress, so as to be thought one of them, and so find out how to overthrow them? So it was done to the devil as well. Since by an evil device he had overthrown man, so that man remained in death, a remedy was found by which he would lose those whom he wrongly held: he was to be entered upon unawares, and the one whom he thought he had killed as a man he was to find in the underworld to be God. When this was done, he was found guilty and lost all whom he held, and thereafter the way to heaven was opened.
Col 2:15 (echo, low confidence) · Heb 2:14 (echo, low confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Christ came hidden in human form so that the devil, killing him as a man, found him God in the underworld and lost all his captives.
- The image of the devil deceived by Christ’s humanity is the author’s; translated as written.
Topics: Christology, Descent into Hades
Cite (SBL): Ambrosiaster, Quaest. 83.4 (CSEL 50:141–142; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/ambrosiaster-quaestiones/83-4). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/ambrosiaster-quaestiones/83-4
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ambrosiaster-quaestiones-83-4) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin (Souter, CSEL 50, 1908); re-read against the Latin, since no public-domain English exists.
83.5CSEL 50:142
Ecce quantum profuit aduentus saluatoris, ut scientes homines, de quo periculo liberati sunt, sine cessatione gratias illi referant! sed forte e contra dicatur: \'si multi ante legemet post legem peccatis pressi totos se carni dederunt et digni fuerunt in tartaro remanere, sine dubio fuerunt qui deuotione et reuerentia creatoris uitam suam naturae lege frenarunt. numquid non etiam hi detenti sunt apud inferos expuncti hac uita? si autem ante uenisset post mortem Adae, liberato Adam qui prior peccauerat ceteris ad caelum aperuerat uiam, ut. quia bene uixerant, agnito creatore defuncti reciperentur in caelum. damnum ergo est, quia non ante uenit Christus.\' damnum esse manifestum est, sed quaere iustum an iniustum sit. solent enim damna iusta esse, de quibus queri non liceat. numquid fur deprehensus et iuxta legem in quadruplum condemnatus ausus est queri? ac per hoc damnum, quod genus hominum passum est, iuste factum est, unde et permissum est.
See how much the Savior’s coming profited, so that people, knowing from what danger they have been set free, may give him thanks without ceasing! But perhaps it will be objected: “If many before the law and after the law, weighed down by sins, gave themselves wholly to the flesh and deserved to remain in Tartarus, without doubt there were also some who, by devotion and reverence toward the Creator, bridled their life by the law of nature. Were not these too held in the underworld once removed from this life? But if he had come earlier, after the death of Adam, then by setting free Adam, who sinned first, he would have opened the way to heaven for the rest, so that those who had lived well and acknowledged the Creator would be received into heaven when they died. It is a loss, then, that Christ did not come earlier.” That it is a loss is plain; but ask whether it is just or unjust. For losses are often just, and one may not complain about them. Has a thief who was caught and condemned to repay fourfold according to the law ever dared to complain? And so the loss the human race suffered was justly done, which is why it was permitted.
Exod 22:1 (allusion, medium confidence) · Rom 2:14 (echo, low confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The objection that the righteous before Christ suffered loss by his late coming is met: the loss was real but just.
- The fourfold penalty for theft: Exod 22:1.
Cite (SBL): Ambrosiaster, Quaest. 83.5 (CSEL 50:142; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/ambrosiaster-quaestiones/83-5). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/ambrosiaster-quaestiones/83-5
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ambrosiaster-quaestiones-83-5) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin (Souter, CSEL 50, 1908); re-read against the Latin, since no public-domain English exists.
83.6CSEL 50:142–143
Quare et saluator inter ipsa primordia uenire non debuit. citui enim diabolus superbiret, homo factus a deo positus est illi inimicus, ut auxiliis dei munitus, quia inpar erat, resisteret ei accepto mandato. diabolus autem solita subtilitate simulauit se ignorare, quid praeceptum esset a deo, et inuenit Euam instabilem; postea autem promittens illi, quod, si interdictum contigissent, praestaret illis deitatem, circumuenit eos. tunc diabolus superato homine triumfauit, hic uictus genus suum subiecit peccato. quam ob rem iniustum erat uictori uiolenter auferre spolia, quia deus quod facit iuste facit, praeterea cum acerbe peccauerit homo. adsentiens enim contra mandatum creatoris fieri se deum idolatriam admisit, per quod in deum peccauit; ideoque non illi statim debuit subueniri, quippe cum nec paenituerit. nec grata enim fuisset misericordia, si non scisset quid mereretur. quamquam enim omnia possit deus, sed illud facit quod conuenit rationi, ut inreprehensibilis perseueret.
This is why the Savior ought not to have come at the very beginning either. For when the devil grew proud, man, made by God, was set up as his enemy, so that, fortified by God’s help, since he was unequal to him, he might resist him, having received a commandment. But the devil, with his usual subtlety, pretended not to know what God had commanded, and found Eve unsteady; then, promising them that if they touched what was forbidden he would grant them deity, he got the better of them. Then the devil, having overcome man, triumphed, and man, conquered, made his race subject to sin. For this reason it would have been unjust to take the spoils from the victor by force, since what God does he does justly, especially since man sinned grievously. For by consenting, against the Creator’s commandment, to become a god, he committed idolatry, by which he sinned against God; and therefore he ought not to have been helped at once, especially since he did not repent. Nor would mercy have been welcome if he had not known what he deserved. For although God can do all things, he does what agrees with reason, so that he may remain beyond reproach.
Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.
Gen 3:1 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 3:5 (allusion, high confidence) · Rom 5:12 (echo, low confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Christ did not come at the beginning, because the devil had justly won his victory over Adam, who sinned grievously and did not repent.
- The digital text opens the second sentence with “citui,” apparently corrupt; translated by sense (“when”).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (word split by a line-end hyphen): resiste- ret → resisteret.
Cite (SBL): Ambrosiaster, Quaest. 83.6 (CSEL 50:142–143; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/ambrosiaster-quaestiones/83-6). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/ambrosiaster-quaestiones/83-6
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ambrosiaster-quaestiones-83-6) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin (Souter, CSEL 50, 1908); re-read against the Latin, since no public-domain English exists.
Chapter 84
84.1CSEL 50:143–144
Absit a Christianis ne sidera uenerari dicantur, quibus indulta est spiritalis cultura, ut despicientes quae uidentur his, quae inuisibilia et supercaelestia sunt, copulentur, ut haec omnia transcendant futuri cum angelis dei. nam siderum cultores aut cum ipsis erunt aut intra ista. qui enim fieri potest, ut aliquis super haec sit quae colit? pagani itaque non conputum lunae obseruant, sed lunam ipsam uelut deam uenerantur et effectus curriculorum eius adprehendisse se arbitrantes, quid certis diebus agendum quidue cauendum sit. decreuerunt imperio huius uitam et conuersationem suam ordine quodam subicientes, quos, quia extra dei ordinationem haec ausi sunt usurpare, falli frequenter deprehendimus. haec enim luminaria in signa temporum deus constituit, unde et nosnumerum lunae custodimus, non illam ipsam excolimus. ut a quarta decima luna, quae nobis secundum legem prima est. rationem paschae obseruemus. omnia enim plena deus instituit; ideoque a decima quarta usque in uigensimam primam, his septem diebus pascha nobis celebrare concessum est, ut de his septem aliqui dies a parasceue usque ad resurrectionem domini concludantur, ut neque tertia decima in passione sit neque quarta decima in resurrectione aut quinta decima ne ante primam secundum nos lunam passio Christi sit neque resurrectio eius non primo die, quo coeptus mundus est.
Far be it that Christians should be said to venerate the stars, Christians to whom a spiritual worship has been granted, so that, despising the things that are seen, they may be joined to those that are invisible and above the heavens, and so transcend all these things, since they will be with the angels of God. For worshippers of the stars will either be with them or beneath them; how can anyone be above the things he worships? So the pagans do not observe the reckoning of the moon; they venerate the moon itself as a goddess, and thinking they have grasped the effects of its courses, what must be done or avoided on certain days, they have made decrees, subjecting their life and conduct in a fixed order to its rule; and because they have dared to usurp these things outside God’s ordering, we often find them deceived. For God set these lights as signs of the times, which is why we too keep the number of the moon, not worship the moon itself: so that from the fourteenth moon, which for us according to the law is the first, we observe the reckoning of Pascha. For God established all things complete; and therefore from the fourteenth to the twenty-first, in these seven days, we are allowed to celebrate Pascha, so that within these seven days are included the days from the Preparation to the Lord’s resurrection, so that the passion does not fall on the thirteenth nor the resurrection on the fourteenth or the fifteenth, lest Christ’s passion come before what is for us the first moon, or his resurrection fall on any day but the first day, on which the world was begun.
Gen 1:14 (allusion, high confidence) · Exod 12:6 (allusion, medium confidence) · Exod 12:18 (allusion, medium confidence) · 2 Cor 4:18 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Christians keep the lunar reckoning for Easter without worshipping the moon, celebrating within the fourteenth to twenty-first day of the moon so that the resurrection falls on the first day of the week.
- The question asks why Christians rebuke pagans for keeping lunar days when they themselves follow the moon in reckoning Easter. The last sentence is compressed in the Latin and is translated by sense.
Topics: Easter and the church year
Cite (SBL): Ambrosiaster, Quaest. 84.1 (CSEL 50:143–144; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/ambrosiaster-quaestiones/84-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/ambrosiaster-quaestiones/84-1
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ambrosiaster-quaestiones-84-1) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin (Souter, CSEL 50, 1908); re-read against the Latin, since no public-domain English exists.
84.2CSEL 50:144–145
Omnia enim mundi tempora unius ebdomadae curriculis numerantur, qua deus mundi membra et ornamenta conposuit. sex enim diebus mundum aptauit et septima cessauit, quam sabbatum appellauit. his enim septem diebus totius mundi ratio et numerus continetur. semper enim in se redeuntes multiplicant numerum temporum. post sabbatum enim a primo die repetit semper usque in diem septimum, id est sabbatum, ut resurrectio domini primo die inchoati mundi facta discatur, qui dies dominicus dicitur. ipsum enim fecit dominus unum, qui uespere in septenarium numerum euolutus incipit iterum, utsit post ebdomadam primus. quod ita decretum ab initio est propter sacramentum incarnationis domini et passionis et resurrectionis. in corpore enim domini totus prope mundus resurrexit et instauratus est.
For all the times of the world are counted by the courses of one week, in which God put together the members and ornaments of the world. For in six days he fitted out the world, and on the seventh he rested, which he called the Sabbath. In these seven days the whole reckoning and number of the world is contained. For, always returning upon themselves, they multiply the number of times. After the Sabbath it always begins again from the first day up to the seventh, that is, the Sabbath, so that the Lord’s resurrection may be learned to have taken place on the first day of the world’s beginning, which is called the Lord’s day. For the Lord made it “one,” and when it has run on in the evening to the number seven, it begins again, so as to be first after the week. This was so decreed from the beginning because of the mystery of the Lord’s incarnation and passion and resurrection. For in the Lord’s body almost the whole world rose again and was renewed.
Gen 2:2 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 1:5 (allusion, medium confidence) · Matt 28:1 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The week of creation measures all time, and the resurrection on the first day shows that the world was renewed in Christ’s body.
- “The Lord made it one” alludes to Gen 1:5 (“one day”).
Cite (SBL): Ambrosiaster, Quaest. 84.2 (CSEL 50:144–145; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/ambrosiaster-quaestiones/84-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/ambrosiaster-quaestiones/84-2
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ambrosiaster-quaestiones-84-2) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin (Souter, CSEL 50, 1908); re-read against the Latin, since no public-domain English exists.
84.3CSEL 50:145–146
Absolutum est non nos lunam colere, sed numerum, qui per lunae cursum institutus est, custodire. diabolus autem, qui est satanas, ut fallaciae suae auctoritatem aliquam posset adhibere et mendacia sua commenticia ueritate colorare, primo mense quo sacramenta dominica scit celebranda, quia non mediocris potentiae est, paganis quae obseruarent instituit mysteria, ut animas eorum duabus ex causis in errore detineret: ut, quia praeuenit ueritatem fallacia, ueritas fallacia uideretur, quasi antiquitate praeiudicans ueritati; et quia in primo mense, in quo aequinoctium habent Romani, sicuti et nos, ea ipsa obseruatio ab his custoditur, ita ut et per sanguinem dicant expiationem fieri, sicut et nos per crucem. hac uersutia paganos detinet in errore, ut putent ueritatem nostram imitationem potius uideri quam ueritatem, quasi per aemulationem superstitione quadam inuentam. \'nec enim uerum potest\', inquiunt, \'aestimari quod postea est inuentum\'. sed quia apud nos pro certo ueritas est et ab initio haec est, uirtutum adque prodigiorum signa perhibent testimonium, ut teste uirtute diaboli inprobitas innotescat. quoniam enim sola est, quae facile suadeat haec, contra uersutiam et praeuentum diaboli posita est, ut simulationem eius reuelet. nemo enim etiam inimicorum negare audeat illic esse ueritatem, ubi uirtus apparet.
It is settled that we do not worship the moon but keep the number that was established by the moon’s course. But the devil, who is Satan, in order to lend some authority to his deceit and colour his lies with invented truth, in the first month, in which he knows the Lord’s mysteries are to be celebrated, instituted mysteries for the pagans to observe (for he is of no mean power), so as to keep their souls in error for two reasons: first, that because falsehood came before the truth, the truth might seem falsehood, as if antiquity prejudged the truth; and second, that because in the first month, in which the Romans have the equinox just as we do, that very observance is kept by them, so that they too say that expiation is made through blood, as we say it is through the cross. By this cunning he holds the pagans in error, so that they think our truth seems an imitation rather than the truth, as though invented by a kind of superstition out of rivalry. “For what was found later,” they say, “cannot be reckoned true.” But because with us the truth is certain and has been from the beginning, the signs of mighty works and wonders bear witness, so that by the testimony of power the devil’s wickedness becomes known. For since power alone easily persuades of these things, it has been set against the devil’s cunning and his anticipation, to reveal his pretence. No one, even among our enemies, would dare deny that the truth is there where power appears.
Rev 12:9 (allusion, low confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The devil set up pagan spring rites with expiation by blood at the time of Easter so that the Christian mysteries would look like an imitation, but Christian miracles show where the truth is.
- The pagan rite of the first month with expiation by blood is not named; probably the spring festival of Cybele and Attis (uncertain).
Topics: Paganism, Easter and the church year
Cite (SBL): Ambrosiaster, Quaest. 84.3 (CSEL 50:145–146; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/ambrosiaster-quaestiones/84-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/ambrosiaster-quaestiones/84-3
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ambrosiaster-quaestiones-84-3) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin (Souter, CSEL 50, 1908); re-read against the Latin, since no public-domain English exists.
Chapter 85
85.1CSEL 50:146–147
Nihil euangelistam quam sensum legis secutum credibile debet uideri, ideoque non inmerito hi ab euangelista sublati sunt de numero ceterorum. sic enim horum continuauit impietas, ut malignum illorum nullum interuallum haberet. a Ioramautem coeptum malignum sic perambulauit usque ad Oziam filium Amessiae, ut nullius lateris esset suffragium, quo ex parte merito patris aliquis horum remaneret in numero regum. nam Ioram maligne agens merito Iosafat remissus in numero est et Ozias merito Ioatham reseruatus in numero est; illorum autem trium continuata malignitas in deum est. Solomon quoque merito patris remissus in regno est et Roboam filius Solomonis maligne agens merito Asaf relictus est in numero regum. illi autem tres in medio malorum conclusi sunt maligne agentes; ideo erasi sunt. peius enim ad perditionemgeneris exemplum est, quando se iugiter malignitas pandit. et ut proprie dicam: propter quod ex traduce eorum non est Iosef, praetermissi sunt. ab Abraham enim horum generationem secutus est euangelista, ex quibus originem trahit Iosef, cui desponsata Maria genuit Christum.
Nothing should seem credible except that the evangelist followed the sense of the law, and therefore these were not undeservedly removed by the evangelist from the number of the others. For their impiety continued in such a way that their wickedness had no interval. The wickedness begun from Joram ran on unbroken down to Uzziah son of Amaziah, so that there was no support on either side by which any of them might remain in the number of the kings on account of a father’s merit. For Joram, acting wickedly, was left in the number because of the merit of Jehoshaphat, and Uzziah was kept in the number because of the merit of Jotham; but the wickedness of those three against God was continuous. Solomon too was left in the kingdom because of his father’s merit, and Rehoboam son of Solomon, acting wickedly, was left in the number of the kings because of the merit of Asa. But those three, acting wickedly, were shut in between evils; therefore they were erased. For it is a worse example, to the ruin of a race, when wickedness spreads itself without a break. And to speak precisely: they were passed over because Joseph does not descend from their line. For the evangelist followed the generation, from Abraham, of those from whom Joseph draws his origin, to whom Mary was betrothed and bore Christ.
Matt 1:8 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 1:17 (allusion, high confidence) · 2 Kgs 8:18 (allusion, medium confidence) · 2 Kgs 8:27 (allusion, medium confidence) · 2 Kgs 14:1 (allusion, low confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Matthew omits Ahaziah, Joash, and Amaziah from the genealogy because their wickedness was unbroken and unredeemed by any father’s merit.
- The question asks why Matthew counts fourteen generations from David to the exile when there were seventeen, omitting Ahaziah, Joash, and Amaziah. The text says Uzziah was kept “by the merit of Jotham” (his son) and Rehoboam “by the merit of Asaf” (Asa, his grandson); translated as written. The final claim that Joseph does not descend from these three is the author’s.
Topics: Scripture and canon
Cite (SBL): Ambrosiaster, Quaest. 85.1 (CSEL 50:146–147; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/ambrosiaster-quaestiones/85-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/ambrosiaster-quaestiones/85-1
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ambrosiaster-quaestiones-85-1) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin (Souter, CSEL 50, 1908); re-read against the Latin, since no public-domain English exists.
Chapter 86
86.1CSEL 50:147
Idonei testis proferimus sermonem. dicit enim angelus ad Mariam inter cetera: et dabit illi dominus deus sedem Dauid patris sui, et regnabit in domo Iacob in aeternum, et regni eius non erit finis. quo modo diceretur ab idoneo teste pater eius Dauid, si non esset Maria ex semine Dauid?
We bring forward the word of a fit witness. For the angel says to Mary, among other things: “And the Lord God will give him the throne of David his father, and he will reign over the house of Jacob for ever, and of his kingdom there will be no end.” How would David be called his father by a fit witness, if Mary were not of the seed of David?
Luke 1:32 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 1:33 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Mary is of David’s line because the angel calls David the father of her child.
- The question asks what proves that Mary was of the tribe and seed of David. Quotation: Luke 1:32–33.
Topics: Christology
Cite (SBL): Ambrosiaster, Quaest. 86.1 (CSEL 50:147; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/ambrosiaster-quaestiones/86-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/ambrosiaster-quaestiones/86-1
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ambrosiaster-quaestiones-86-1) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin (Souter, CSEL 50, 1908); re-read against the Latin, since no public-domain English exists.
Chapter 87
87.1CSEL 50:147–148
Nihil paene nouum; sic enim trinitas praedicatur, ut unus deus credatur. non ergo additum est aliquid, sed sacramentum dei unius reuelatum. inter ipsa autem primordia manifestari non oportuit, quia prius praedicandum est et postea id quod praedicatum est reuelandum, ut scias patrem esse, a quo cuncta sunt, filium uero dici, per quem sunt omnia, spiritum autem sanctum appellari, per quem omnia, quae a patre quidem, sed per filium sunt, regenerantur ad fidem dei unius. hi ergo tres sunt quidem, sed una diuinitas. ratio igitur facit ut tres sint, non plures aut infra. omnis enim numerus usque ad nouem peruenit, quia tres, dum inuicem in se sunt, faciunt numero nouem, quia in uno tres sunt et tres in unum. qui enim uidet unum, uidet tres, dum nihil differt alter ab altero. tres ergo unum et ter tres unum; hoc est, in nono numeroperfectio est, quantum ad numerum pertinet, quia de uno sunt omnia. addito enim uno, ex quo uel in quo tres qui numerantur nouem, fiunt decem aut XX. semper tamen usque ad nouem uenitur et unus additur, quia nouem unum sunt, ut plena perfectio sit unitatis.
Almost nothing new; for the Trinity is preached in such a way that one God is believed. So nothing has been added, but the mystery of the one God has been revealed. It ought not to have been made manifest at the very beginning, because first there must be preaching, and afterward what was preached must be revealed, so that you may know that the Father is the one from whom all things are, that the Son is said to be the one through whom all things are, and that the Holy Spirit is called the one through whom all things, which are from the Father but through the Son, are regenerated to faith in the one God. These, then, are indeed three, but one Godhead. Reason, then, makes them three, not more or fewer. For every number reaches up to nine, because three, while they are in one another, make nine in number, since three are in one and three in one. For whoever sees one sees three, since one differs in nothing from another. Three, then, are one, and three times three are one; that is, perfection lies in the number nine, so far as number is concerned, because all things are from one. For when one is added, from whom or in whom the three who are counted make nine, the result is ten or twenty. Yet one always comes up to nine and one is added, because nine are one, so that the perfection of unity may be full.
1 Cor 8:6 (allusion, medium confidence) · Rom 11:36 (echo, low confidence) · John 14:9 (echo, low confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Faith in three persons is faith in one God, revealed after it had been preached, and the author illustrates it by number speculation on three and nine.
- The question asks why the hope of salvation lies in three, not two or four or one, and why the Trinity was not preached from the beginning. The number speculation is the author’s; translated as written. Echo of 1 Cor 8:6.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip (hi read as h)): h ergo tres → hi ergo tres.
Topics: Trinity
Cite (SBL): Ambrosiaster, Quaest. 87.1 (CSEL 50:147–148; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/ambrosiaster-quaestiones/87-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/ambrosiaster-quaestiones/87-1
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ambrosiaster-quaestiones-87-1) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin (Souter, CSEL 50, 1908); re-read against the Latin, since no public-domain English exists.
Chapter 88
88.1CSEL 50:148–149
Prout causa se fecit, ita et dominus se ostendit. profetae enim uisus est quasi rex corripiens plebem et hoc se ostendit quod erat; in pace enim erat causa deitatis eius. Stephanoautem ut stans appareret, fecit calumnia Iudaeorum. in Stephano autem saluatoris causa uim patiebatur; ideo sedente iudice deo stans apparuit, quasi qui causam diceret, et quia bona causa eius est, ad dexteram iudicis erat. omnis enim qui causam dicit, stet necesse est.
As the case required, so the Lord showed himself. To the prophet he appeared as a king rebuking the people, and he showed himself as what he was; for the cause of his deity was at peace. But that he appeared standing to Stephen was brought about by the false accusation of the Jews. In Stephen the Savior’s cause was suffering violence; therefore, with God the judge seated, he appeared standing, as one pleading a case, and because his cause is good, he was at the right hand of the judge. For everyone who pleads a case must stand.
Isa 6:1 (allusion, high confidence) · John 12:41 (allusion, high confidence) · Acts 7:55 (allusion, high confidence) · Acts 7:56 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Isaiah saw the Lord seated as a ruling king, but Stephen saw him standing as an advocate pleading a case at the judge’s right hand.
- The question asks why, if the new covenant has greater grace, Isaiah saw the Lord of hosts (Christ, according to John 12:41) seated on the throne, while Stephen saw him standing.
Topics: Christology
Cite (SBL): Ambrosiaster, Quaest. 88.1 (CSEL 50:148–149; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/ambrosiaster-quaestiones/88-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/ambrosiaster-quaestiones/88-1
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ambrosiaster-quaestiones-88-1) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin (Souter, CSEL 50, 1908); re-read against the Latin, since no public-domain English exists.
Chapter 89
89.1CSEL 50:149–150
Cum saluatori non crederent Iudaei neque mundanae potestates — quia non solum hominibus se manifestari uoluit, sed et principibus et potestatibus in caelestibus, sicut docet apostolus in epistula ad Efesios —, post passionem suam uera se locutum spiritum sanctum probaturum ostendit. et hoc est \'arguere mundum\', ostendere illi uera esse quae credere noluit. credere enim noluit a deo uenisse saluatorem. saluator autem seruata iustitia non trepidauit reuerti ad eum qui se miserat, et per id quod regressus est, probauit se inde uenisse, quia nemo ascendit ad deum, nisi qui descendit a deo. uidentes ergo potestates ascendere eum confusae sunt, uidentes uerum esse quod uelut falsum spreuerant. itaque ista iustitia arguit eos, qua iustum probatum est, quia regressus est unde uenerat. sic autem arguit eos de peccato, quia non solum credere ei noluerunt, sed et occiderunt eum. de iudicio uero sic eos corripuit, dum ostendit principem mundi reum factum et conpressum ab eo, cuius fidei non communicarunt. uidentes enim animas de inferis ire in caelos cognouerunt adiudicatum esseprincipem huius mundi, ut reus factus in causa saluatoris quae tenebat amitteret.
Since neither the Jews nor the worldly powers believed the Savior (for he willed to be manifested not only to men but also to the principalities and powers in the heavenly places, as the apostle teaches in the letter to the Ephesians), he showed that after his passion the Holy Spirit would prove that he had spoken the truth. And this is “to convict the world”: to show it that what it refused to believe is true. For it refused to believe that the Savior had come from God. But the Savior, keeping righteousness, did not fear to return to him who had sent him, and by going back he proved that he had come from there, because no one ascends to God except the one who descended from God. Seeing him ascend, then, the powers were confounded, seeing that what they had spurned as false was true. So this righteousness convicts them, by which he was proved righteous, because he went back to where he had come from. And he convicts them of sin in this way, that they not only refused to believe him but also killed him. Of judgment he rebuked them in this way, by showing that the ruler of the world was made guilty and restrained by him in whose faith they had no share. For seeing souls going from the underworld into heaven, they recognized that the ruler of this world had been condemned, so that, made guilty in the Savior’s case, he lost what he held.
John 16:8 (quotation, high confidence) · John 16:9 (allusion, high confidence) · John 16:10 (allusion, high confidence) · John 16:11 (allusion, high confidence) · Eph 3:10 (allusion, high confidence) · John 3:13 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The Spirit convicts the world of sin, righteousness, and judgment by proving, through Christ’s ascension and the release of souls from the underworld, that he came from God.
- The question quotes John 16:8–11.
Topics: Descent into Hades, The Holy Spirit
Cite (SBL): Ambrosiaster, Quaest. 89.1 (CSEL 50:149–150; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/ambrosiaster-quaestiones/89-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/ambrosiaster-quaestiones/89-1
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ambrosiaster-quaestiones-89-1) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin (Souter, CSEL 50, 1908); re-read against the Latin, since no public-domain English exists.
89.2CSEL 50:150
Haec quidem ascendente saluatore uisa sunt, sed superueniente in discipulos spiritu sancto palam aperteque manifestata sunt. uera enim correptio tunc fuit, quando postpassionem ad testimonium saluatoris publice a perfidis uidebantur resurgentes mortui, claudi currentes, leprosi mundati, paralytici confirmati, caeci aspicere, surdi audire, muti eloqui, daemoniatici purgati, infirmi recuperata sanitate gratias agere. hoc modo spiritus sanctus arguit mundum, quia in nominesaluatoris, qui reprobatus est a mundo, omnium curationum uirtutes operatus est.
These things were indeed seen when the Savior ascended, but when the Holy Spirit came upon the disciples they were made manifest openly and plainly. For the true rebuke came then, when after the passion, as testimony to the Savior, the faithless saw publicly the dead rising, the lame running, lepers cleansed, paralytics strengthened, the blind seeing, the deaf hearing, the mute speaking, the demon-possessed cleansed, and the sick giving thanks with their health restored. In this way the Holy Spirit convicts the world, because in the name of the Savior, who was rejected by the world, he worked the powers of every kind of healing.
Acts 2:4 (allusion, medium confidence) · Acts 3:6 (allusion, low confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The miracles worked through the apostles in Christ’s name after Pentecost were the Spirit’s public conviction of the world.
Cite (SBL): Ambrosiaster, Quaest. 89.2 (CSEL 50:150; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/ambrosiaster-quaestiones/89-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/ambrosiaster-quaestiones/89-2
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ambrosiaster-quaestiones-89-2) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin (Souter, CSEL 50, 1908); re-read against the Latin, since no public-domain English exists.
Chapter 90
90.1CSEL 50:150–151
Diabolus non speciale nomen est, sed commune. in quocumque enim opera diaboli fuerint inuenta, sine dubio diabolus appellandus est. operis enim nomen est, non naturae. itaque hoc in loco patrem Iudaeorum Cain significat, cuius imitatores uolentes esse saluatorem peremerunt Iudaei. hunc dicit, quia se parricidio maculauit et reum fecit mortis, in ueritate non stetisse. ab ipso autem forma data est fratricidii. istum ipsum dicit, cum loquitur mendacium, de suis propriis loqui, ut ostenderet unum quemque non nisi propria uoluntate peccare. sed quia imitator diaboli est, adiecit: quia mendax est, sicut et pater eius. hic enim ut primum hominem morte condemnaret, simulauit se nescisse quid praeceptum fuisset a deo. similiter et Cain interrogatus finxit se nescire, ubi esset frater suus Abel, quem occiderat. hoc ergo in loco diabolum Cain esse dixit, patrem autem eius diabolum, cuius opera secutus est; diaboli enim filius diabolus est. sed diabolus ille, qui et satanas, patrem in malitia sua nullum habet; ipse enim sibi in malo auctor est. prior enim ipse peccauit, ac per hoc quicumque imitati illum fuerint filii eius dicentur, et ille pater eorum. etenim nos in fide Abraham patrem habemus, quia prior ipse credidit deo, ac per hoc nomine eius censemur; fideles enim dicimur sicut et ille.
“Devil” is not a proper name but a common one. In whomever the works of the devil are found, he must without doubt be called a devil; for it is the name of a work, not of a nature. So in this place he signifies Cain as the father of the Jews, whose imitators the Jews wished to be when they killed the Savior. He says that this man did not stand in the truth, because he stained himself with the murder of a kinsman and made himself guilty of death. From him the pattern of fratricide was given. He means this same man when he says that when he speaks a lie he speaks of his own, to show that each one sins only by his own will. But because he is an imitator of the devil, he added: “because he is a liar, as is his father too.” For the devil, in order to condemn the first man to death, pretended not to know what God had commanded. Likewise Cain too, when asked, pretended not to know where his brother Abel was, whom he had killed. So in this place he called Cain the devil, and the devil, whose works he followed, his father; for the devil’s son is a devil. But that devil who is also Satan has no father in his wickedness; he is the author of evil to himself. For he sinned first, and therefore whoever imitate him will be called his sons, and he their father. For we too have Abraham as father in faith, because he first believed God, and therefore we are reckoned by his name; we are called faithful as he was.
John 8:44 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 4:8 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 4:9 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 John 3:12 (allusion, medium confidence) · Gen 3:1 (allusion, medium confidence) · Gen 15:6 (allusion, medium confidence) · Rom 4:11 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: In John 8:44 “devil” is a name for a kind of work, so the father of the Jews there is Cain, the first murderer and liar, whose own father is the devil.
- The question asks, if the devil is Satan, what the Savior means in John 8:44. The reading of the passage as referring to Cain, and its application to the Jews, is the author’s; translated as written.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip (est read as eat)): quia mendax eat → quia mendax est.
Topics: The devil and demons
Cite (SBL): Ambrosiaster, Quaest. 90.1 (CSEL 50:150–151; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/ambrosiaster-quaestiones/90-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/ambrosiaster-quaestiones/90-1
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ambrosiaster-quaestiones-90-1) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin (Souter, CSEL 50, 1908); re-read against the Latin, since no public-domain English exists.