Homilies of Maximus of Turin (Bruni's collection) 115.1–118.1
Authorship disputed: Bruni's 1784 collection as printed in Migne; modern scholarship (Mutzenbecher, CCSL 23, 1962) judges a number of these pieces to be by other authors. The individual pieces are not yet sorted on this site.
Latin text: Migne, PL 57 (Latin text: Migne, Patrologia Latina, digitized by Open Greek and Latin (patrologia_latina-dev, University of Leipzig), CC BY-SA 4.0).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0).
Chapter 115
115.1PL 57:521b–523a
Si diligenter animadvertit evangelicum capitulum quod lectum est vestra dilectio, sensus vestros id ipsum capitulum potuit penetrare, cur Dominus, sicut Scriptura refert, cum ab altero interpellatus fuerit, ut eum quocunque iisset, causa religiosi servitii, sequeretur, alteri magis dixerit : Sequere me; et illo spreto atque despecto alium potius tacentem, nec opinantem tacentemque delegerit. Et cum utique acceptius voluntarium obsequium esse soleat, quam coactum, et servitium plus placeat, non quod imperio exigitur, sed quod sponte defertur : cur ergo iste respuitur, cur vel indiguus etiam recusatur? Ait enim ad eum Doipinus : Vulpes foveas habent, et volucres cœli nidos; Filius autem hominis non habet ubi caput reclinet (Matth. VIII). Primum itaque hoc considerare debemus, quod non est acceptor Dominus personarum. Est enim aequus judex et justus; sed pro qualitate horum rependat dileclionis affectum, et eum eligat, non qui verbis promptus, devotione piger,sed qui fuerit lingua tacitus, mente devotus, de quo dicit Propheta : Tacitum te faciens, sapiens videberis (Prov. XVII). De illo autem qui petulanter loquitur refert Scriptura : Non omnis qui dicit mihi, Domine, Domine, intrabit in regnum caelorum; sed qui fecerit volunta- tem meam (Matth. VII). Hinc ergo discimus quod ad Dominum non tam ore quam corde clamandum est. Igitur Salvator noster, qui cogitationes hominum sensusque pervidet, audiens quidem vocis obsequium, mentis autem versutiam recognoscens, tali itlum animali comparat, quod aliud voce indicet, aliud moribus operetur. Vulpis enim latratu canis resonat, dolo rapinam fraudis exercet. Tacentem ergo, nec opinantem assumit. Tacebat quidem lingua, sed spiritu loquebatur. Intelligimus enim quam devotus . fuerit qui, sicut ipse asseruit, patrem reliquit mor. tuum, ut vitæ Dominum reperiret. Ait enim : Permitte mihi prius ire, et aepelire patrem meum ( Luc. . IX). Mortuum ergo illum reliquerat quem ut revertens sepeliret exorat. Non enim eum dolor reti- nuerat, non mors retardaverat, quia festinabat ad vitam. Necdum monentis clauserat oculos, necdum rigentia membra condiderat : statim ut comperit advenisse Dominum, oblitus paternæ pietatis affectum, . majore pietate credidit plus Christum diligere quam parentem. Legerat enim fortasse propheticam lectionem quæ dicit : Obliviscere populum tuum, et domum patris tui (Psal. XIV). Propterea oblitus est patris, dum memor est Salvatoris. Audierat etiam Evangelium Domini : Qui plus dilexerit patrem aut matrem non est me dignus ( Matth. x). Ita cur Tobias justificetur, cur sepulturæ causa prandiuin dereliquerit (Tob. I), hic probatur, cum causa Christi patris reliquerit sepulturam. Ille enim non veretur ne interveniente opere terreni prandii epulas prætermitteret; hic metuit ne interveniente mora rete. ctionem panis cœlestis amittat. Unde cum Christi contemplatione sepulturam omnibus debeamus, hic amore Christi patris deseruit sepulturam. Discutiamus itaque primo illius interpretationem, responsionemque Doinini Salvatoris. Ait illi : Sequar te quocunque ieris (Luc. IX). Prompta quidem, sed superba responsio. Iturus enim ad passionem erat Dominus, descensurus ad inferos, ascensurus ad coelum : nunquid in omnibus illum potest fragilitas humana comitari? Stulta magis est ista præsumptio potius quam religiosa confessio. Siquidem et Petro apostolo dicitur a Domino, cum existimaret se sequi per omnia Salvatorem : Quo ego vado , non potes me modo sequi (Joan. XIII). Et cum pertinaciter, ac se ab eo nec morte diceret separandum, tanquam jactantiae condemnatus audit, quod esset Dominum tertio negaturus. Itaque qui promittebat a confes- I sione Christi nec morte divelli, ab ejus socie- taLe interrogatione ancillulæ separatur; et nisi veluti modum quemdam statuens, tertio eum dixisset Dominum negaturum, forsitan saepius interrogatus, frequenter denegasset. Quid ergo respondetur illi petulanti? Vulpes foveas habent, el volucres cæli nidos, et Filius hominis non habet ubi caput reclinet (Matth. VIII). Videte cui rei subtiliter comparetur. Est enim hoc genus animalis fallax, et rapinis semper intentum, rapinam fraude exercens, quod nihil tutum, nihil otiosum, nihil patiatur esse securum, quod inter ipsa quoque hominum domicilia prædam requirat. Quam comparationem non solum propter illam scriptam puto, sed propter plerosque etiam Christianos, qui ore quidem Dominum confitentur, moribus autem vulpium fallacia diversantur. Omnia enim Christianus qui vult sua peccata celare, hic spiritualiter vulpis est. Sicut enim vulpis propter fraudes suas latibulis demoratur; ita et peccator tacens propter conscientiam suorum peccatorum foveis delitescit. Et sicut illa non audet iuter medias hominum turbas morum suorum oatenure fallaciam; ita et hic erubescit in media ecclesia conversationis suæ nequitiam conflteri. Vulpem plane dixerim cmnem Christianum qui suo insidiatur vicino, qui quotidie nititur fines alienos arrodere, fructus invadere, animalia devorare, et quod est familiare huic tempori, non tam vulpium more pullos, sed luporum more rapere porcos : qui, dum suo labore possit vivere, ferarum rabie prædam captat alienam. Haereticos etiam omnes arbitror vulpibus comparandos, qui cum in domo Domiai habitare non possint, conventicula sibi quaedam velat foveas praeparant tenebrosas, in quibus pertinaciter latentes insidiantur Ecclesiæ, ut si qua innocens anima forte processerit, velut pullum gallinae matris absorbeant. Insidiautur, inquam, vulpes Ecclesiæ, hoc est, evangelicae illi gallinæ de qua ait Dominus : Quoties volui congregare filios tuos sicut gallina colligit pullos suos sub alas suas (Matth. XXIII).
If your love has carefully noticed the gospel chapter that was read, that very chapter could have pierced your minds: why the Lord, as Scripture reports, when he was asked by one man that he might follow him wherever he went, for the sake of devout service, said rather to another, "Follow me"; and, the first being spurned and slighted, chose instead another who was silent and not expecting it. And since voluntary service is usually more acceptable than forced, and service pleases more not when it is exacted by command but when it is offered freely, why then is the one rejected, why is he even refused as unworthy? For the Lord says to him: "Foxes have dens, and the birds of the sky nests; but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." First, then, we must consider that the Lord is not a respecter of persons. For he is a fair and just judge; but he repays the affection of love according to the quality of these men, and chooses not him who is ready in words and lazy in devotion, but him who is silent in tongue and devout in mind, of whom the prophet says: "By keeping silent you will seem wise." But of him who speaks forwardly Scripture reports: "Not everyone who says to me, Lord, Lord, will enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does my will." From this, then, we learn that one must cry to the Lord not so much with the mouth as with the heart. Our Saviour, then, who sees through the thoughts and minds of men, hearing indeed the service of the voice but recognizing the cunning of the mind, compares him to such an animal as shows one thing by its voice and does another by its ways. For the fox sounds like a dog in its bark, but practises the plunder of fraud by guile. He takes up, then, the silent man who was not expecting it. His tongue was silent indeed, but he spoke in spirit. For we understand how devout he was who, as he himself declared, left his father dead so as to find the Lord of life. For he says: "Allow me first to go and bury my father." He had left dead, then, the man whom he asks to bury on his return. For grief had not held him back, death had not delayed him, because he was hastening to life. He had not yet closed his dying father's eyes, had not yet laid out his stiffening limbs: as soon as he learned that the Lord had come, forgetting the affection of filial piety, he believed with a greater piety that he should love Christ more than his parent. For perhaps he had read the prophetic reading that says: "Forget your people and your father's house." Therefore he forgot his father while he remembered the Saviour. He had also heard the Lord's Gospel: "Whoever loves father or mother more than me is not worthy of me." So, if Tobit is justified because he left his lunch for the sake of a burial, this man is approved when for Christ's sake he left his father's burial. For the one did not fear that, with the work intervening, he would miss the dishes of an earthly lunch; this one feared that, with delay intervening, he would lose the refreshment of the heavenly bread. Hence, though for Christ's sake we owe burial to all, this man for love of Christ abandoned his father's burial. Let us first discuss, then, the first man's proposal and the response of the Lord Saviour. He says to him: "I will follow you wherever you go." A ready answer indeed, but a proud one. For the Lord was going to his passion, about to descend to the underworld, about to ascend to heaven: can human frailty accompany him in all these? This is rather a foolish presumption than a devout confession. Indeed the apostle Peter too, when he thought he would follow the Saviour in all things, is told by the Lord: "Where I am going, you cannot follow me now." And when he insisted, saying that not even death would separate him from him, he hears, as one condemned for boasting, that he would deny the Lord three times. So he who promised that not even death would tear him from the confession of Christ is separated from his fellowship by the questioning of a little maidservant; and had the Lord not said, as if setting a kind of limit, that he would deny him three times, perhaps, questioned more often, he would have denied him often. What, then, is answered to that forward man? "Foxes have dens, and the birds of the sky nests, and the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head." See to what he is subtly compared. For this kind of animal is deceitful and always bent on plunder, practising robbery by fraud, so that it allows nothing to be safe, nothing at rest, nothing secure, and seeks prey even among the dwellings of men. I think this comparison was written not only because of that man but also because of many Christians who confess the Lord with the mouth but live in their ways with the deceit of foxes. For every Christian who wishes to hide his sins is spiritually a fox. For as the fox because of its frauds lingers in hiding places, so the silent sinner, because of the consciousness of his sins, lurks in dens. And as the fox does not dare to show the deceit of its ways among crowds of men, so this man blushes to confess the wickedness of his conduct in the midst of the church. I would plainly call a fox every Christian who lies in wait for his neighbour, who daily strives to gnaw at another's boundaries, invade his crops, devour his animals, and, what is common in this time, to seize not chickens in the manner of foxes but pigs in the manner of wolves; who, though he could live by his own labour, catches another's prey with the fury of wild beasts. I think all heretics too are to be compared to foxes, who, since they cannot live in the Lord's house, prepare for themselves certain conventicles like dark dens, in which, lurking stubbornly, they lie in wait for the Church, so that if any innocent soul perhaps comes out, they may swallow it like a chick of the mother hen. They lie in wait, I say, as foxes for the Church, that is, for that hen of the Gospel of whom the Lord says: "How often I wished to gather your children as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings!"
Matt 8:19 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 8:20 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 8:21 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 9:57 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 9:59 (quotation, high confidence) · Acts 10:34 (allusion, medium confidence) · Prov 17:28 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 7:21 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 45:10 (44:11 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 10:37 (quotation, high confidence) · John 13:36 (quotation, high confidence) · John 13:37 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 26:34 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 26:69 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 23:37 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Christ rejected the man who boasted he would follow him anywhere, comparing him to a fox, and chose the silent man who left his dead father; foxes are also deceitful Christians, thieves and heretics who lie in wait for the Church.
- The preacher identifies the man who asked to bury his father with the one Christ called. Tobit's leaving his meal to bury the dead is Tob 2:1–4. The printed reference 'Psal. XIV' is to Ps 45:10 (Vulgate 44:11).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (stray footnote letter): sensusque e pervidet → sensusque pervidet; (Psal. XIV). f Propterea → (Psal. XIV). Propterea; superba g responsio → superba responsio; intentum, a rapinam → intentum, rapinam; delitescit. b Et sicut → delitescit. Et sicut; (Matth. XXIII) e. → (Matth. XXIII)..
Extrabiblical texts: Tob 2:1-4 (Tobit [in RC, EO, ETH canons]; allusion)
Topics: Heresy
Cite (SBL): Maximus of Turin, Hom. 115.1 (PL 57:521b–523a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/maximus-taurinensis-homiliae/115-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/maximus-taurinensis-homiliae/115-1
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-maximus-taurinensis-homiliae-115-1) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Bruni's Latin text as printed in Migne PL 57 (Open Greek and Latin digitization). No public-domain English translation exists and no modern English was available for checking, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
115.2PL 57:523a–523b
Vitemus ergo, fratres, vitemus pestiferos vulpium insidiantium dolos, vitemus mortiferas nequissimorum animantium captiones, ne sicut vulpes quondam quas Samson (Judic. xv) ille fortissimus in agro Philistinorum armatas facibus immisit, quae omnia combussere flammis quae contigere vestigiis; ita fructus nostrarum segetum perversorum dogmatum vulpes aut insidiarum deceptione capiant, aut flammarum adustione consument. Simus ergo, ut legimus, et simplices ut columbae, et astuti ut serpentes, ut simplicitatem scilicet columbarum serpentium tueatur astutia, et ita malum facere nesciamus, ut tamen vitare possimus; per Dominum nostrum Jesum Christum, cui est honor et gloria, etc.
Let us avoid, then, brothers, let us avoid the pestilent tricks of lurking foxes, let us avoid the deadly snares of most wicked animals; lest, as once the foxes which that mighty Samson sent into the field of the Philistines armed with torches burned with flames everything their tracks touched, so the foxes of perverse doctrines should either seize the fruits of our crops by the deceit of snares or consume them by the burning of flames. Let us be, then, as we read, both simple as doves and wise as serpents, so that the wisdom of serpents may guard the simplicity of doves, and so that we may not know how to do evil and yet be able to avoid it; through our Lord Jesus Christ, to whom be honour and glory, and so on.
Judg 15:4 (allusion, high confidence) · Judg 15:5 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 10:16 (quotation, high confidence) · Song 2:15 (echo, low confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The conclusion: beware of the 'foxes' of false doctrine, like Samson's foxes that burned the fields, and be simple as doves and wise as serpents.
- Conclusion of 115.1.
Topics: Heresy
Cite (SBL): Maximus of Turin, Hom. 115.2 (PL 57:523a–523b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/maximus-taurinensis-homiliae/115-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/maximus-taurinensis-homiliae/115-2
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-maximus-taurinensis-homiliae-115-2) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Bruni's Latin text as printed in Migne PL 57 (Open Greek and Latin digitization). No public-domain English translation exists and no modern English was available for checking, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
Chapter 116
116.1PL 57:523ci–525c
Diligenter vos audiisse credo, fratres, evangelicam lectionem quæ nuper lecta est, ubi Dominus Jesus Christus ingressus sabbato synagogam, hominis sibi habentis manum aridam spirituali medicina curavit, non appositis herbarum succis, non pigmentorum medicaminibus colligatis, sed verbo jubens, et in ira præcipiens refudit corpori sanitatem. Ira, inquam, sicut ait Evangelista, restituit vigorem dextera. Unde intelligimus qualis dominicae benignitatis sit sanitas, cujus indignationis talis est medicina ; aut quemad- modum placatus prodest, qui ita miseretur iratus. Verbo igitur jubet ut arenti dexterae venarum se succus infunderet. Non mirum est si is arentem reparavit dexteram, qui totum corpus de arenti pulvere procreavit, et id verbi imperio restituit quod in principio factura operationis instituit, velut auclorem suum plasma cognoscens obsequitur et in portiuncula, cui totam se deberet in massa. Sed videamus quae sit in Synagoga manus arida; quae nihil corpori suo prodest, quando operibus siccavit, quando etiam primum arida esse coeperit requiramus. Non enim unius hominis tantum per Salvatorem causa geritur, nec unius hominis imbecillitas procuratur, sed totius generis humani salvatur infirmitas. Nulli autem dubium est dexteram vel totius corporis praeclariorem portionem hoc officii gerere, ut diurna alimenta suo corpori subministret, et pro- videntia quadam ad fruendam vitam membra caetera pascat ac nutriat. Hanc igitur dexteram in Judaico populo scribas esse dixerim vel doetores, qui velut preclarior portio in Pharisæorum corpore a Domino constituti, neglexerunt, et in cætera membra sua prophetarum oraculis saglnare; hoc est noluerunt Christum corpori suo, secundum prophetarum oracula, velut escam vitæ æternæ porrigere, atque ideo doctrina eorum tanquam manus aruit imbecillis, quia fontem perennis sapientiae non quaesivit. Propterea denique factum est ut quasi contracta dextera clavem scientiae tenere non posset, sicut ait Dominus : Væ vobis, Scribce et Pharisæi , qui absconditis clavem scientiæ (Luc. xi), et reliqua. Hæc autem clavis Christas est Dominus, quo ad credulitatem Mei pectorum nostrorum arcana reserantur. Ista clavis a Pharisæis perditur, ab apostolis invenitur; sicut ait Dominus Petro : Tibi dabo claves regni caelorum. Ergo aruit dextera Synagogae manus, relinquens Christum, in principibus Judæorum deterioravit ergo Synagogæ dextera. Quisquis enim Christi fontem deserit debilitatur protinus, imo membris omnibus Aebilior reperitur. Sed invenio ipsam manum quondam caeteris membris fuisse meliorem. Sanctus enim Moyses, dux Judaici populi, velut clanor corporis sui dextera fuit, cum legem porrigendam meruit a Divinitate percipere. Dextera, inquam, erat sanct us Moyses, qui filios Israel, velut manu provida coelesti manna nutrivit. Haec plane est destera, quae Jamnem et Mambrem magos nivei splendoris nitore convicit. Ita enim scriptum habes : Cum protulisset Moyses de sinu manum suam, prae- clari candoris luce fulgebat; atque ideo magorum destructæ sunt tenebrae, quia Moysi meritis lucens dextera coruscabat. Sed videamus, manus ista quando primum arida esse cœperit vel mortua. Ego tUam primum in Adam aruisse confirmo, cum contra vetitum Domini interdictæ arboris poma decerpsit, ac tunc succum immortalitatis amisit. Et tunc siccata quodammodo est, quando hominem ad imaginem Dei factum peccato suo solvi fecit in pulverem. Atque utinam sola manus peccato teneretur obnoxia; quod est gravius, omne corpus morte damnatum est, cum dextera prima peccaverit. Nec mireris si membrum dexterae in Adam non mansit integrum : vigor enim in illa æternitatis exaruit. Nam sicut Moysi dextera custodientis mandata Domini niveo fulgore resplenduit, ita et Adæ dextera prævaricantis Dei praecepta mortifero pallore contracta est. Hanc igitur Adæ manum Salvator curat in synagoga, hoc est totius generis numam imbecillitatem sanare festinat; unde communis ita est medicina. Dicit enim etiam illi: Extende manum tuam, qui eam idolis immolando contraxit : extende manum tuam, cujus dextera usuras accipiendo siccavit. Dicit illi : eftende manum, qui per eam rem orphanorum et viduarum gestit invadere. Sed et tu qui putas manum habere te sanam, cave ne avaritia contrahatur. Quin potius extende eam pro misericordia frequenter ad pauperem, pro hospitalitate saepius ad peregrinum. Extende eam pro peccatis semper ad Dominum, esto misericors, esto largus; observa quod ait propheta : Ne sit manus tua ad accipiendum porrecta, et ad erogandum contracta (Eccl. IV). Sic enim manus tua sana esse poterit, si abstineatur malis factis, bonis vero operibus extendatur.
I believe, brothers, that you listened carefully to the gospel reading which was read just now, where the Lord Jesus Christ, entering the synagogue on the sabbath, cured with spiritual medicine a man who had a withered hand: not applying the juices of herbs, not binding on the remedies of ointments, but commanding by a word and ordering in anger, he poured health back into the body. In anger, I say, as the evangelist says, he restored strength to the right hand. From this we understand what health the Lord's kindness brings, when his indignation is such a medicine; or how he profits when appeased, who shows such mercy when angry. By a word, then, he orders the sap of the veins to pour into the withered right hand. No wonder if he restored a withered right hand who created the whole body from dry dust, and restored by the command of a word what in the beginning he established by the work of making; as though the thing formed, recognizing its maker, obeys him also in a small portion, to whom it owed itself wholly in the mass. But let us see what the withered hand in the synagogue is, which does nothing for its body, when it dried up in its works, and let us inquire when it first began to be withered. For it is not the cause of one man alone that is handled by the Saviour, nor the weakness of one man alone that is attended to, but the infirmity of the whole human race is saved. There is no doubt that the right hand, the more distinguished part of the whole body, performs this office: to supply daily food to its body and, by a kind of providence, to feed and nourish the other members for the enjoyment of life. This right hand in the Jewish people, then, I would say is the scribes or teachers, who, set by the Lord as the more distinguished part in the body of the Pharisees, neglected to fatten their other members with the oracles of the prophets; that is, they would not offer Christ to their body, according to the oracles of the prophets, as the food of eternal life; and so their teaching withered like a weak hand, because it did not seek the spring of everlasting wisdom. Accordingly it came about that, as with a shrunken right hand, it could not hold the key of knowledge, as the Lord says: "Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, who hide the key of knowledge," and so on. This key is Christ the Lord, by whom the secrets of our hearts are unlocked to belief. This key is lost by the Pharisees and found by the apostles, as the Lord says to Peter: "To you I will give the keys of the kingdom of heaven." So the right hand of the synagogue withered, leaving Christ; in the rulers of the Jews the right hand of the synagogue grew worse. For whoever deserts the spring of Christ is weakened at once, or rather is found weaker than all the members. But I find that this hand was once better than the other members. For holy Moses, leader of the Jewish people, was like the more illustrious right hand of his body, when he was found worthy to receive from the Godhead the law to be held out. Holy Moses, I say, was the right hand, who fed the children of Israel with heavenly manna as with a provident hand. This plainly is the right hand which overcame the magicians Jannes and Mambres with the brightness of snowy splendour. For so you have it written: when Moses brought his hand out of his bosom, it shone with the light of brilliant whiteness; and so the darkness of the magicians was destroyed, because the right hand gleamed shining by the merits of Moses. But let us see when this hand first began to be withered or dead. I affirm that it first withered in Adam, when against the Lord's prohibition he plucked the fruit of the forbidden tree, and then lost the sap of immortality. And it was then dried up in a way when by his sin it caused man, made in the image of God, to be dissolved into dust. And would that only the hand were held liable for sin! What is heavier, the whole body was condemned to death when the right hand sinned first. Nor should you wonder if the member of the right hand did not remain whole in Adam: for the vigour of eternity withered in it. For as the right hand of Moses, who kept the Lord's commandments, shone with snowy brightness, so the right hand of Adam, who transgressed God's precepts, shrank with deadly pallor. This hand of Adam, then, the Saviour cures in the synagogue; that is, he hastens to heal the weakness of the whole human race; hence the remedy is common to all. For he says also to him: "Stretch out your hand," to the one who shrank it by sacrificing to idols; "stretch out your hand," to the one whose right hand dried up by taking interest. He says to him: "Stretch out your hand," who is eager by it to seize the property of orphans and widows. But you too who think you have a healthy hand, beware lest it be shrunk by avarice. Rather, stretch it out often to the poor in mercy, more often to the stranger in hospitality. Stretch it out always to the Lord for your sins; be merciful, be generous; observe what the prophet says: "Let not your hand be stretched out to receive and drawn back from giving." For so your hand will be able to be healthy, if it is kept back from evil deeds and stretched out in good works.
Mark 3:1 (allusion, high confidence) · Mark 3:5 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 6:6 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 2:7 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 11:52 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 16:19 (quotation, high confidence) · Exod 16:15 (allusion, medium confidence) · Exod 4:6 (allusion, high confidence) · Exod 4:7 (allusion, high confidence) · 2 Tim 3:8 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 3:6 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 3:19 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Christ healed the withered hand by a word in anger; the withered right hand is the scribes who withheld Christ from the people, and ultimately Adam's sinning hand, which Christ heals in all who stretch out their hands to the poor and to God.
- 'In anger' follows Mark 3:5. Moses' hand made white (Exod 4:6–7) is linked with the contest against Pharaoh's magicians, named Jannes and Mambres as in 2 Tim 3:8. The closing saying is Sir 4:31 (printed 'Eccl. IV'). The polemic against the scribes and the synagogue is the preacher's own.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (leaked column number; stray footnote letter): de e arenti → de arenti; membra sua a prophetarum → membra sua prophetarum; caelorum. e Ergo aruit → caelorum. Ergo aruit; principibus 385 Judæorum → principibus Judæorum; habes : g Cum protulisset → habes : Cum protulisset; orphanorum k et viduarum → orphanorum et viduarum.
Extrabiblical texts: Jan. Jam. (Jannes and Jambres; allusion); Sir 4:31 (Sirach [in RC, EO, ETH canons]; quotation)
Topics: Ethics
Cite (SBL): Maximus of Turin, Hom. 116.1 (PL 57:523ci–525c; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/maximus-taurinensis-homiliae/116-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/maximus-taurinensis-homiliae/116-1
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-maximus-taurinensis-homiliae-116-1) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Bruni's Latin text as printed in Migne PL 57 (Open Greek and Latin digitization). No public-domain English translation exists and no modern English was available for checking, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
Chapter 117
117.1PL 57:525c–527b
Dicit in Evangelio Dominus Jesus Christus : Amen dico vobis, facilius est transire camelum per foramen acus, quam divitem intrare in regnum cœlorum (Matth. XIX). Quae sententia vereor ne forte vobis conveniat, qui divilias saeculi hujus aut habetis aut quaeritis. Sicut enim cameli anima!, quod est tortuosum atque deforme, perversitas ipsa corporis per angustissimam acus cavernam praeterire non patitur: ita et divites oneratos avaritia, et cupiditate fœdatos, ipsa vitae deformitas per arctam viam regni minime introirc permittit. Ait enim idem Dominus : Arcta et angusta via est quas ducit ad vitam (Matth. VII). Igitur in camelo difficultatem introitus praestat habitudo membrorum. In divite autem impedimentum magnitudo efficit peccatorum. Gibbus enim quidam est animae, turpe quid cogitare vel facere, ac mentis quaedam tortuosa deformitas, immundis rebus semper intendere, et ab Ecclesiae sancto limine curis sæcularibus avocari. Unde mihi videtur hanc deformitatem corporis propheta spiritualiter elocutus, foeditatem morum potius indicasse, cum dicit: non sic glorietur gibberosus, sicut rectus. Quasi diceret non ita glorietur peccator vitiorum suorum pravitate distortus, sicut gloriatur justus conscientiae bonæ simplicitate- directus. Quamvis enim, o peccator, proceritate corporis gaudeas, quamvis scapularum tuarum aequali. tate laeteris, anima tamen tua tuorum pravitate de- formis est. Recte ergo camelo comparatus est dives. Siquidem illum a transitu acus corporis crassiludo revocat, hunc ab ingressu Ecclesiae patrimonii sollici- ' tudo detentat. Et sicut illum parvum foramen non capit oneratum mole membrorum, ita et hunc introi; tus sanctus non suscipit gravatum cumulo delictorum. Uterque babet propriam sarcinam suam : ille onera- tus est carnibus, iste peccatis; et sicut ille inhabilis est angustissimae acus cavernae, ita et hic inconvemens est beatissimo Dei regno; nisi quod camelum corpore incompositum natura, hunc autem pravum voluntas efficit. Haec autem dico, fratres, de iis qui ne festivissimam diem S. Epiphaniæ in Ecclesia procurarent, patrimoniorum suorum compedibus sunt detenti, et terreno quodam obligati sunt vinculo, ut venire eis ad domum Domini non liceret. Non quod eos quidpiam detinet, sed quod ita propriis sint acUbus implicati, ut jam arbitrium vivendi suæ potestatis amiserint; et dum sollicitudinem sui patrimonii exhibent, animarum medicinam penitus non requirunt. Quid mihi, o dives, difficultatemdtemporis objicis Quid necessitatem inseris repentinam? Si cor habes, intellige quia omni necessitate major necessitas est salutis: et utilior est causa prius cunre vitam, quam peculii damna sarcire, ne dum augmentum patrimonii quaerimus, sentiamus animæ detrimentum. Sed forte judicem metuis, quem in secretario reliquisti. Mihi crede, quod magis Dcum judicem meluere debes, qui de ipso suo judice jodicabit. Illum ergo metuis qui mox accipiet successorem, Dominum non metuis, cui nemo aliquando succedit! Considera igitur judicii imminentem diem, et inexstinguibiles gehennæ flammas, stridorem horridum dentium, tenebrarum ultimum cruciatum. Et si potes, relicta Ecclesia, saecularibus sollicitudinibus impli- care. V creor enim ne dum mundi divitias quæritis, inveniatis potius divitias peccatorum, et repertis thesauris saeculi, coelestes thesauros amittatis.
The Lord Jesus Christ says in the Gospel: "Truly I say to you, it is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven." I fear that this saying may perhaps fit you who either have or seek the riches of this world. For as the very crookedness of body of the camel, a twisted and misshapen animal, does not let it pass through the very narrow hole of a needle, so the very deformity of their life does not at all allow rich men, loaded with avarice and defiled by greed, to enter by the narrow way of the kingdom. For the same Lord says: "Narrow and confined is the way that leads to life." In the camel, then, the shape of the limbs causes the difficulty of entry; but in the rich man the greatness of his sins makes the obstacle. For to think or do something shameful is a kind of hump of the soul, and a kind of twisted deformity of mind is always to be intent on unclean things and to be called away from the holy threshold of the Church by worldly cares. Hence the prophet seems to me, speaking spiritually of this deformity of body, rather to have indicated foulness of conduct when he says: "Let not the hunchback boast like the upright." As if he said: let not the sinner, twisted by the depravity of his vices, boast as the just man boasts, made straight by the simplicity of a good conscience. For though, sinner, you rejoice in the tallness of your body, though you are glad of the evenness of your shoulders, your soul is misshapen by the depravity of your ways. Rightly, then, is the rich man compared to a camel. For the bulk of its body calls the one back from passing through the needle; anxiety for his inheritance holds the other back from entering the Church. And as the small hole does not admit the one loaded with the mass of its limbs, so the holy entrance does not receive the other weighed down with a heap of sins. Each has his own burden: the one is loaded with flesh, the other with sins; and as the one is unfit for the very narrow hole of a needle, so the other is unsuited to the most blessed kingdom of God; except that nature made the camel ill-formed in body, but will makes the rich man crooked. I say these things, brothers, about those who, so as not to keep the most festive day of holy Epiphany in church, were held back by the fetters of their inheritances and bound by a kind of earthly chain, so that they could not come to the house of the Lord. Not that anything detains them, but that they are so entangled in their own affairs that they have now lost the free choice of living in their own power; and while they show anxiety for their inheritance, they do not seek the medicine of souls at all. Why do you, rich man, put forward to me the difficulty of the times? Why do you bring in a sudden necessity? If you have a heart, understand that greater than every necessity is the necessity of salvation; and it is a more useful cause to care first for life than to repair the losses of your property, lest while we seek the increase of our inheritance we suffer loss of soul. But perhaps you fear the judge whom you left in his chamber. Believe me, you ought rather to fear God the judge, who will judge that very judge of yours. You fear him, then, who will soon receive a successor; you do not fear the Lord, whom no one ever succeeds! Consider, then, the threatening day of judgment and the unquenchable flames of Gehenna, the horrid gnashing of teeth, the outermost torment of darkness. And then, if you can, leave the Church and entangle yourself in worldly cares. For I fear that while you seek the riches of the world you may rather find riches of sins, and having found the treasures of the world, may lose the heavenly treasures.
Matt 19:24 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 7:14 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Kgs 20:11 (quotation, medium confidence) · Matt 8:12 (allusion, medium confidence) · Mark 9:48 (allusion, medium confidence) · Matt 6:20 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The camel and the needle's eye describe rich men whose cares kept them from church on the feast of Epiphany; the preacher urges them to fear God's judgment more than a civil judge.
- 'Let not the hunchback boast like the upright' is the Greek (LXX) form of 1 Kgs 20:11 (LXX 3 Kingdoms 21:11).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (scribal colophon leaked into the text; stray footnote letter; stray footnote letter and leaked column number): corpore a incompositum natura, 38B hunc → corpore incompositum natura, hunc; meluere e debes → meluere debes; amittatis. Explicit. → amittatis..
Topics: Ethics
Cite (SBL): Maximus of Turin, Hom. 117.1 (PL 57:525c–527b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/maximus-taurinensis-homiliae/117-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/maximus-taurinensis-homiliae/117-1
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-maximus-taurinensis-homiliae-117-1) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Bruni's Latin text as printed in Migne PL 57 (Open Greek and Latin digitization). No public-domain English translation exists and no modern English was available for checking, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
Chapter 118
118.1PL 57:527c.–529b
Satis ad correctionem vestram arbitror posse sufficere, fratres dilecti, quod anteriore dominica profecturus nulla vobis sacrarum Litterarum spiritualia dona largitus sum, sed tantum vos increpans et arguens pro peccato sine aliqua prædicationis consolatione dimiserim. Volui enim vos hoc ipsum intelligere, quam gravi'ter peccaveritis, quod divina eloquia audire minime meruistis. Hæc enim sacerdotum vehemens et copiosa vindicta est indignis quibusque litterarum coelestium sacramenta non credere, nec, sicut ait Dominus, dare sanctum canibus, neque margaritas projicere porcorum pedibus conculcandas (Matth. viij. Perdit enim coelestis margaritae gratiam quisquis eam foedissimo peccatori circumdare conatur. Gemma enim, sicut ipsi scitis, nisi auro non convenit, margarita, nonnisi pretiosis monilibus non aptatur. Estote ergo aurum optimum, estote monile pretiosum, ut possit in vobis margarita spiritualis includi. Margarita enim Christus est Dominus, quam negotiator ille dives in Evangelio, venditis omnibus rebus suis, emere festinavit, et maluit omnes, quas habebat, saeculi gemmas amittere, tantum ut unam Christi emeret margaritam. Unde et ego, fratres, pro magnitudine quod admiseratis delicti, nolui vobis pandere evangelicae refectionis eloquia; sed magis ingerere animosæ indignationis injuriam, et prius vos verberibus spiritualibus emendare, ac sic margaritæ ditare munerihus : malui, inquam, peccatum vestrum incusando acriter increpare, quam leniter dissimulando nutrire. Quisquis enim fralrem. non arguit peccantem, quodammodo hortatur. Nolo autem pu- tetis quod-non de amore iaciam vos saepius verbe- -I-.. rando. Filius enim qui castigatione dignus est, plus amatur, sicut ait Scriptura sancta : Quem enim diligit Dominus corripit; castigat autem omnem filium quem recipit (Prov. m). Dicite mihi si non dolendum fuerit hoc peccatum, sic vos salutis vestrae immemores tunc fuisse, ut beatissimis apostolis Petro et Paulo honorificentiam minime redderetis, cum ipsos esse sciatis doctores gentium, auctores martyrum, principes sacerdotum, nec volueritis eorum natalem nobiscum festivissimum celebrare, atque illi coelesti interesse convivio in quo pro martyrum tanta laetitia substantiam vitæ ipse nobis Dominus ministravit' Vultis autern scire quantis bonis fraudati fueritis? Interrogate fratres, qui tunc mecum pariter adfuerunt, quam refecti a dominica mensa discesserint, vel quales secum domum spirituales divitias reportaverint. Uoum scio, quod si quis illa die honoratus aut dives, ob natalem filii sui ad decimum usque milliarium ad prandium rogavisset, propter accuratas epulas, et inæquales mensuras, absque dubio vos ituros fuisse. Igitur, fratres, quotiescunque martyrum memoriam celebramus, prætermissis omnibus saeculi actibus, sine aliqua dubitatione concurrere debemus, reddere illis honorificentiam qui vobis salutem profusione sui sanguinis pepererunt, qui tanquam sacrata hostia pro nostra propitiatione Domino suot oblati, præsertim cum dicat ad sanctos suos omnipotens Deus: Qui vos honorat, me honorat ; et qui vos spernit, me spernit (Luc. x). Quisquis ergo honorat martyres, honorat et Christum ; et qui spernit sanctos, spernit et Dominum.
I think it can be enough for your correction, beloved brothers, that last Sunday, as I was setting out, I bestowed on you no spiritual gifts of the sacred letters, but only rebuked you and reproved you for sin and dismissed you without any consolation of preaching. For I wished you to understand this very thing, how gravely you had sinned, that you did not deserve to hear the divine words. For this is the severe and abundant punishment of priests: not to entrust the mysteries of the heavenly letters to the unworthy, nor, as the Lord says, to give what is holy to dogs or cast pearls to be trampled under the feet of swine. For whoever tries to put the heavenly pearl around a most foul sinner loses its grace. For a gem, as you yourselves know, suits only gold; a pearl is fitted only to precious necklaces. Be, then, the finest gold, be a precious necklace, so that the spiritual pearl may be set in you. For the pearl is Christ the Lord, whom that rich merchant in the Gospel, having sold all his goods, hastened to buy, and preferred to lose all the gems of the world he had, provided he could buy the one pearl of Christ. Hence I too, brothers, because of the greatness of the sin you had committed, would not open to you the words of the Gospel's refreshment, but rather inflicted on you the injury of a spirited indignation, and first amended you with spiritual blows, and so enriched you with the gifts of the pearl. I preferred, I say, to rebuke your sin sharply by accusing it rather than to nourish it by gently overlooking it. For whoever does not reprove a brother who sins in a way encourages him. And I do not want you to think that I do not do it out of love when I strike you more often. For the son who deserves chastisement is more loved, as holy Scripture says: "For the Lord reproves him whom he loves, and chastises every son whom he receives." Tell me whether this sin was not to be grieved over: that you were then so forgetful of your salvation as not to render honour to the most blessed apostles Peter and Paul, though you know that they are the teachers of the Gentiles, the authors of the martyrs, the chiefs of the priests, and would not celebrate their most festive birthday with us and be present at that heavenly banquet in which, for the great joy of the martyrs, the Lord himself served us the substance of life? Do you want to know how great the goods are of which you were cheated? Ask the brothers who were present with me then how refreshed they went away from the Lord's table, and what spiritual riches they carried home with them. One thing I know: if on that day some man of rank or wealth had invited you to lunch on his son's birthday as far as the tenth milestone, you would without doubt have gone, for the sake of the carefully prepared dishes and the unequal measures. Therefore, brothers, whenever we celebrate the memory of the martyrs, we ought to put aside all the business of the world and run together without any hesitation to render honour to those who brought forth salvation for you by the shedding of their blood, who were offered to the Lord as a consecrated victim for our propitiation; especially since almighty God says to his saints: "Whoever honours you honours me, and whoever despises you despises me." Whoever, then, honours the martyrs honours Christ too; and whoever despises the saints despises the Lord too.
Matt 7:6 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 13:45 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 13:46 (allusion, high confidence) · Prov 3:12 (quotation, high confidence) · Heb 12:6 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 10:16 (quotation, medium confidence) · Matt 10:40 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The preacher explains that he withheld a sermon to punish the people for neglecting the feast of the apostles Peter and Paul, and urges them to honour the martyrs, since honour to them is honour to Christ.
- 'Their birthday' is the feast of the martyrdom of Peter and Paul (29 June). The closing saying adapts Luke 10:16 (with Matt 10:40). 'The unequal measures' (inaequales mensuras) seems to mean generous servings of wine; the sense is uncertain.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (stray footnote letter): minime a redderetis → minime redderetis; ob e natalem → ob natalem.
Topics: Martyrdom
Cite (SBL): Maximus of Turin, Hom. 118.1 (PL 57:527c.–529b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/maximus-taurinensis-homiliae/118-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/maximus-taurinensis-homiliae/118-1
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-maximus-taurinensis-homiliae-118-1) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Bruni's Latin text as printed in Migne PL 57 (Open Greek and Latin digitization). No public-domain English translation exists and no modern English was available for checking, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.