Commentary on Matthew 7–9
Latin text: Migne, PL 9 (Latin text: Migne, Patrologia Latina, digitized by Open Greek and Latin (patrologia_latina-dev, University of Leipzig), CC BY-SA 4.0).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0).
Chapter 7
7PL 9:953–957
Et descendente eo de monte, secutæ sunt eum turbæ multœ. El ecce leprosus quidam veniens adorabat eum dicens, Domine, si vis, poles me mundare, et reliqua. In exordio sermonis admonuimus, ne quis forte existimaret aliquid rerum gestarum (idei detrahendum, si res ipsas profectns rerum conserluentium continere in se doceremus. Nihil enim veritati detrabit, imitationein veritas consecuta. Toto igitur superiore sermone Dominus fidei præcepta tradiderat, legem excesserat, jam inutilem atque inefficacem excedendo significans. Mandaturum observantiam exegerat, ante promissorum suorum spern fidissimam imperaverat; quod igitur post hæc primum gesserit, contucudum esi. Adest leprosus, emundari se rogat, purgalur verbi polestate cum tactu, jubetur silere, sed lamen ostendere se sacerdoli et munus quod Moyses in testimonium fieri præcepil offerre. Curatio igitur audientis et credemis turbæet cum Domino de monte venicntis in leproso ostenditur: quæ viliosa labe corporis contaminata, auditaque regni coelorum prædicatione curari se rogat; cum tactu corporis visilatur, Verbi virlute curatur et ut salus bæc non offerretur. potius, quam quæreretur, silentium imperatur,et ostendere se sacerdotibus jubetur: ut prænuntiatus in lege factis et operibus cernatur; et in quo lex infirmabatur, in eo' verbi virtus intelligeretur: præmium quoque receptæ salulis, qui purgaius est, Deo offerat; sed ut donum illud non sit ex avibus, sed ut homo ipse a sordibus peccati corporis emundatus, in sacrificium Dei transeat; quia quod Moyses in lege præceperil, testimonium sit, non effectus. Post hœc autem cum introisset Capharnaum, occessil ad eum quidam tribunus rogans enm, et dicens: Puer mens jacet in domo paralyticus, etc.. Sequilur emundationem leprosi, paralytici pueri curaiio. Sed quid istud est, quod non dignum se tribunus puri dominus profitetur esse, ut Christus do* mum ejus introeat, puerum videat, eL præsens præsenti orem afferat; seque habere mililes, jubere quod velit, et in poteslaie posito parere sibi plurimos, similiter el Dominum curationem verbo posse præstare? Dc tribuno posuisse me satis sit, principem esse gentium crediturarum. Quis hie princeps sit cui subjecti sunt plures, qui volet scire, Moysi in Deuleronomio canticum, et Salomonis librum Ecclesiastieum. ubi de dispersione gentium quædam locuti sunt, legal: nobis tantum de puero tractaius sit. Succedit deinde in hoc puero post paralysis sanitaicm curationi populi de monte descendentis, salus gentium. Jacebat enim puer dissolutus in domo humili, corruptiblli. et ingressu ejus, cujus lamen egeus erat, Salvatoris indigua. Et tribunus scit puerum verbo posse sanarit quia salus gentium omnis ex fide est, eL ill præceptis Domini vila est universorum. Igitur jacentes in sre-' cute, et peccatorum morbis dissolulae gentes exislimandæ sunt: omnibus undique arliibus fluidis, el ad consistendi olficium ingrediendique corruptis. Quarum salutis sacramentum in tribuni puero expletur. non tamen ingressuro domum Christo. Licet enim in saeculo demoratus sit, vitia tamen saeculi et peccata non adiit. Miratus deinde fidem ait, Non inveni tantam fidem in Israel. Non erat tribunus iste de gentibus: et quomodo in Israel fides talis non est reperia; cum qui crederet esset Israelita? Sed ut similitudinem futuri hæc ipsa veritas æmularetur; idcirco verbi ratio subjecta est, tantam fidem. quanta gentium est, in Israel non reperiendam, el cum Abraham et Isaac cl Jacob in regno coelorum ex ultimis gentibus quieturos. Perfecta quidem est ih puero secundum credentis (idem veritas sanitatis: sed praesentium efficientia etiam futurorum imagini proficere monstratur, quando et tribuno credente, et puero salvato, nec talis in Israel fides reperta est, et regnl coelorum consortium cum Abraham gentibus destinalur. Cum venisset Jesus in domam Petri, vidit sucrum ejus jacentem et febricitantem, et reliqu i. In socru Petri, vitiosa infidelitalis æstimatur affectio, cul adjacel libertas voluntalis, quæ nos quadam sibi conjugii societate conjungit. Ergo ingressu Domini, in Petri domu, id est, in corpore curatur infldelilas peccatorum calore exæstuans, ct vitiorum apgra dominatu. Mox deinde sanata, officii famulatu ministrat, Nam primus crcdidit, et apostolatus est princeps: et quod in eo ante languebat, Dei verbo invalescens minisierio lamquam publicæ salutis operatum est. Recte autem hanc ex socru Petri similitudinem ad affectionem in* fidelitatis aptari, loco qui de num et socru consequitur tractabimus. Nunc autem ideo infidelitaiis socrus Petri nuncupabitur, quia usque dum credidit, voluntatis suæ servitio detine* batur. Vespere autem facto obtulerunt ei multos dœmonia habentes: et ejiciebat spiritus immundos, etc.. Curalionem promiscuam horis vespertlnis, concursu eorum quos post passiouem docuit recognosciinus: omnium peccata dimiitens, omnium infirmitates auferens, et malarum voluptatum insidentium incentiva depellens, passione corporis sui, secundum prophetarum dicta, infirmitates bumanæ imbecillilatis absorbens. Videns autem tln Jesus turbas multas circum set jussil disciputos suos ire trata fretum. Et accedens ad eum quidam Scriba ail, Magister, sequar te quocumque ieris, et reliqua Multa incurrunt, quæ sensum communem movcre possunt. Atqne non noa intelligentiam fingimus, s d gesta ipsa intelligentiam nobis impertiuntur. Neque enim res intelligentiæ, sed rei intelligeulia subsecundat. Turbæ plures sunt, et ire tratis fretum Dominus discipulis præcipit. Non existimo cadere in Salvatoris bonilatem, ul circumcursantes relinquere voluerit, et secrelmn quoddam impertiendæ salmis cligere. Deinde consequitor Scriba, dicens magistrum se quocumque ierit secuturum: sed nihil a Scriba dictum factumve legitur. quod posset offendere Deminus respondit, vulpibus esse foveas, et cœli volucribus nidos quiescendi, filio autem hominis, quo reelinet caput suum, locum esse nullum. Et discipulum postulasse. dari sibi tempus patris sepeliendi: hoc negatum, et pli atque humani officii vetitam religionem. Ergo rerum tantarum. et tam diversarum ratio promenda est: atque ila, ut secundum continentem rerum ordinem, et gravissimas veritatis ipsius caasas, interioris significantiæ intelligentia explicetur. Discipulorum nomen non in duodeciin tantum Apostolis versari existimandum est. Nam praeter Apostolos. plures fuisse discipulos legimus. Ex omni igitur turba quædam fieri jubetur electio: eorUm scilicet, qui Dominum per multa sæculi hujus pericula el jactationes essent secuturi. Ecclesia enim instar est navis. et plurimis locis ita nuneupata est i quae diversissimi generis et gentis vectore suscepto, subjecta est omnibus et ventorum flatibus et maris mOLibus. Atque ita illa et sæculi et intmundorum spirituum vexatur incursibtis. Propositis enim perioulorum omnium motibus, Christi navem, Id est, Ecclesiam introimus: scientes hos marl ventoque jactandos. Ut igitur ordo typicæ significantiæ cohæreret, possetque intelligi fidelium portio conscendentium navem, et infidelium turba residenitium; Scribse et discipuli persona subjungiiur. Et quidem Scriba, qui est unus ex doctoribus legis, an sit secuturus interrogat. Quasi vero lege nOli hunc esse Christum, quem sequi esset utile, contineretur. Igitur infldelitatis affectum sub diffidentia interrogationis expressit: quia fidel assumptio n interroganda est, sed sequenda. Ut autem eadem inierrogatio infidelitatis esset punita iudicio; Dominus respondit, vulpos habere foveas, et volucres coeli nidos quibus requiescani, hominis autem filium non habere ubi caput suum rectinet. Vulpes est animal insidiosuin, circa doinorum se occulens foveas, et domesilcis avibus insidians: atque hoc nomine pseudoprophetas nuncupari aliquot locis legimus. Volucres autem coeli ssepe numero immuudos spiritus cognominari didicimus. Oei ergo filius paucitatem sequenlium contuens, et dnctore legis diffidente an sequeretur ipsum, exprobrat pseudoproplieiis esse foveas, et immundis spiritibus nidos quiescendi; quod extra navcin relicti, id est, extra Ecclesiam positi, effecti sint incolatus pseudoprophetarum, et habitatio dæmonum: filium autem hominis, se scilicet cui caput Deus sit, non reperire in quos collocata Dei cognitione requiescat: invitatis omnibus ut in navem, ita in Ecclesiam; paucis metu maris, iJ est sæculi. secuturis. Adest post hæc discipulus, non interrogans an sequatur (jam enim sequi oportere se credidit), sed permitti sibi orans sepelire patrem. Accepimns in dominicae oralinnis exordio, ita primum precandum: Pater noster qui es in coelis. Ergo quia credentis in discipulo populi persona est, admonetur ut meminerit quod pater sibi vivOs in cœlis est. Sequi autem Dominum jubetur, quia et volebat, ila ut morlui mortuum sepelianl. Sed nullum arbitror officium exspeclari a mortuis posse. Quomodo ergo mortui mortuos humabunt? Primum igitur ostendit, perfectam in se fidcm nulla sæcularis in ailerum ofneii religione esse devinctam: deinde inter fidelem filiuni patremque infidelem jus paterni nominis non relinqui. Non igitur obsequium liumandi pairis negnvit: sed addendo, Dimitte morluos sepeiire mortuos suos, admonuit non admisceri memoriis sanctoruni morluos inhdeles: mortuos autem etiam eos esse, qui extra Deum vivant. Et idcirco mutua mortuis officia relinquenda, ut morlui sepeliamur a mortuis: quia per Dei fidem vivos vivo oporteat adhærere.
“And when he came down from the mountain, great crowds followed him. And behold, a leper came and worshiped him, saying: Lord, if you will, you can make me clean,” and the rest. At the beginning of our discourse we warned that no one should think anything is to be taken away from the truth of the events if we teach that the events themselves contain in themselves the course of the events that would follow. For it takes nothing from the truth that the truth has achieved an imitation. In the whole preceding discourse the Lord had handed on the precepts of faith and gone beyond the law, signifying by going beyond it that it was now useless and ineffective. He had required the observance of the commandments and before that had commanded a most faithful hope in his promises; so we must consider what he did first after these things. A leper is present; he asks to be cleansed; he is purged by the power of the word together with a touch; he is ordered to be silent, but nevertheless to show himself to the priest and to offer the gift that Moses commanded to be made as a testimony. So in the leper is shown the healing of the crowd that heard and believed and came down from the mountain with the Lord: which, defiled by the vicious stain of the body, having heard the preaching of the kingdom of heaven, asks to be healed; it is visited by the touch of a body, it is healed by the power of the Word; and, so that this salvation might be sought rather than offered, silence is imposed, and he is ordered to show himself to the priests: so that he who was foretold in the law might be discerned by his deeds and works, and that in the matter in which the law was weak the power of the word might be understood; and that he who has been cleansed might offer to God the reward of the health he received; but so that that gift might not be made from birds, but that the man himself, cleansed from the filth of the body’s sin, might pass over into a sacrifice to God; because what Moses commanded in the law is a testimony, not the effect. “After this, when he had entered Capernaum, a tribune came to him asking him and saying: My servant lies at home paralyzed,” and so on. The healing of the paralyzed servant follows the cleansing of the leper. But what does it mean that the tribune, the servant’s master, professes that he is not worthy for Christ to enter his house, see the servant, and, present to one present, bring help; and that he has soldiers and orders what he wills, and many, set under his authority, obey him, and that likewise the Lord can supply healing by a word? Concerning the tribune let it be enough for me to have stated that he is the chief of the nations that would believe. Who this chief is, to whom many are subject, let whoever wishes to know read the song of Moses in Deuteronomy and Solomon’s book Ecclesiasticus, where they have said certain things about the dispersal of the nations: let our treatment concern only the servant. In this servant, then, after the health from paralysis, the salvation of the nations follows the healing of the people coming down from the mountain. For the servant lay disabled in a lowly, corruptible house, unworthy of the entry of the Savior whom he nevertheless needed. And the tribune knows that the servant can be healed by a word, because all the salvation of the nations is from faith, and in the precepts of the Lord is the life of all. So the nations are to be considered as lying in the world and disabled by the diseases of sins, with all their limbs everywhere loose and spoiled for the office of standing and walking. The mystery of their salvation is fulfilled in the tribune’s servant, Christ not entering the house. For although he lived in the world, he did not go into the vices and sins of the world. Then, marveling at his faith, he says: “I have not found such faith in Israel.” This tribune was not from the nations; and how is such faith not found in Israel, when the one who believed was an Israelite? But in order that this very truth might imitate the likeness of the future, the reason of the word was laid underneath: that such faith as belongs to the nations would not be found in Israel, and that men from the farthest nations would rest with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob in the kingdom of heaven. The truth of health was indeed perfected in the servant according to the faith of the believer: but the effect of present things is shown to serve also as an image of the future, when, the tribune believing and the servant being saved, such faith was not found in Israel and fellowship in the kingdom of heaven with Abraham is destined for the nations. “When Jesus had come into Peter’s house, he saw his mother-in-law lying sick with a fever,” and the rest. In Peter’s mother-in-law the vicious disposition of unbelief is considered, to which is joined the freedom of the will, which binds us to itself by a kind of fellowship of marriage. So at the Lord’s entry into Peter’s house, that is, into the body, unbelief is healed, burning with the heat of sins and sick with the dominion of vices. Then, at once healed, she ministers in the service of duty. For he first believed and is the chief of the apostleship; and what was formerly languishing in him, growing strong by the word of God, worked by its ministry as if for the public salvation. That this likeness from Peter’s mother-in-law is rightly applied to the disposition of unbelief we shall treat in the passage that follows about the daughter-in-law and mother-in-law. Now she will be called the mother-in-law of unbelief because, until he believed, he was held in the service of his own will. “When evening came, they brought to him many who had demons, and he cast out the unclean spirits,” and so on. In the indiscriminate healing at the evening hours we recognize the gathering of those whom he taught after the passion: forgiving the sins of all, taking away the infirmities of all, and driving out the incitements of evil pleasures that sit upon them, absorbing by the passion of his body the infirmities of human weakness, according to the sayings of the prophets. “When Jesus saw great crowds around him, he ordered his disciples to go across the sea. And a scribe came to him and said: Teacher, I will follow you wherever you go,” and the rest. Many things occur that can trouble common sense. Yet we do not invent the understanding; the events themselves give us the understanding. For the thing does not follow the understanding, but the understanding follows the thing. The crowds are many, and the Lord commands the disciples to go across the sea. I do not think it befits the Savior’s goodness that he should have wished to leave those running around him and to choose some secret place for giving salvation. Then a scribe follows, saying that he will follow the teacher wherever he goes: but nothing is read to have been said or done by the scribe that could give offense. The Lord answered that foxes have holes and the birds of the sky nests for resting, but the Son of Man has no place where he may lay his head. And a disciple asked that time be given him to bury his father: this was refused, and the religious duty of a devoted and human office was forbidden. So the reason for such great and such different things must be brought out, and in such a way that the understanding of the inner meaning is unfolded according to the connected order of events and the weightiest causes of the truth itself. The name of disciples must not be thought to apply only to the twelve apostles. For we read that besides the apostles there were many disciples. So from the whole crowd a certain choice is commanded to be made: of those, namely, who would follow the Lord through the many dangers and tossings of this world. For the church is like a ship, and is called so in many places: which, having taken on passengers of the most different kind and nation, is subject to all the blasts of the winds and the movements of the sea. And so it is troubled by the attacks of both the world and the unclean spirits. For with the movements of all dangers set before us, we enter the ship of Christ, that is, the church, knowing that we will be tossed by sea and wind. So, that the order of the typological meaning might hold together, and the portion of the faithful going on board the ship and the crowd of the unfaithful remaining behind might be understood, the persons of the scribe and of the disciple are added. And indeed the scribe, who is one of the teachers of the law, asks whether he should follow. As if it were not contained in the law that this is the Christ whom it would be profitable to follow. So he expressed the disposition of unbelief under the distrust of a question: because the taking up of faith is not to be asked about but followed. And so that this same question of unbelief might be punished by judgment, the Lord answered that foxes have holes and the birds of the sky nests in which they rest, but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head. The fox is a crafty animal, hiding in holes around houses and lying in wait for domestic birds: and we read in several places that false prophets are called by this name. And we have learned that the birds of the sky are very often a name for unclean spirits. So the Son of God, seeing the fewness of those following, and the teacher of the law distrusting whether he should follow him, reproaches that the false prophets have holes and the unclean spirits nests for resting; because those left outside the ship, that is, placed outside the church, have become the lodging of false prophets and the dwelling of demons: but that the Son of Man, that is, he whose head is God, finds none in whom, the knowledge of God being placed, he may rest: all being invited into the church as into the ship, but few, for fear of the sea, that is, of the world, about to follow. After this a disciple is present, not asking whether he should follow (for he already believed that he must follow), but praying to be allowed to bury his father. We have received in the opening of the Lord’s Prayer that we must first pray thus: “Our Father who are in heaven.” So since the disciple bears the person of the believing people, he is reminded to remember that his living Father is in heaven. And he is ordered to follow the Lord, since he also wished to, in such a way that the dead should bury the dead. But I think no service can be expected from the dead. How, then, will the dead bury the dead? First, then, he shows that a faith perfect in itself is bound by no worldly religious duty toward another; next, that between a faithful son and an unfaithful father the right of the paternal name is not left. So he did not refuse the duty of burying a father; but by adding, “Let the dead bury their own dead,” he warned that the unfaithful dead are not to be mixed with the memorials of the saints, and that those too are dead who live outside God. And therefore mutual services are to be left to the dead, that the dead may be buried by the dead: because through faith in God the living must cling to the Living.
Matt 8:1–4 (quotation, high confidence) · Lev 14:4–7 (allusion, medium confidence) · Matt 8:5–13 (quotation, high confidence) · Deut 32:8 (allusion, medium confidence) · Matt 8:10–11 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 8:14–15 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 10:35 (allusion, medium confidence) · Matt 8:16–17 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 53:4 (allusion, medium confidence) · Matt 8:18–22 (quotation, high confidence) · Ezek 13:4 (allusion, low confidence) · 1 Cor 11:3 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 6:9 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The leper, the tribune’s servant, Peter’s mother-in-law, the evening healings, the scribe, and the disciple who would bury his father are read as figures of the believing crowd, the nations, unbelief healed, and the church as Christ’s ship.
- Migne’s marginal headings, column numbers, footnote markers, and references are removed by logged corrections.
- Hilary says the tribune was an Israelite; translated as written. “Solomon’s book Ecclesiasticus” is Sirach (cf. Sir 17:17 on the rulers set over the nations).
- On the burial of the dead: Hilary says the unfaithful dead are not to be mixed with the memorials (tombs) of the saints; translated as written.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne column number in the digital text; Migne column number, paragraph number, and marginal heading (editor's summary, not the author's text); Migne footnote marker in the digital text; Migne's Scripture reference left in the text; Migne's marginal heading (editor's summary, not the author's text); Migne's paragraph number and marginal heading (editor's summary, not the author's text); OCR slip in the digital text (digit for letter); split word and stray mark in the digital text): (Matth.VIII, i el 2) → ; Curatio igitur (I) audientis → Curatio igitur audientis; bæc 700 non → bæc non; 6x avibus → ex avibus; præ- ] stare → præstare; (Deut. XXXII) → ; credente, 701 et → credente, et; G. Petri socrus infidelitatis affectio. Petrus fidei et aposto/atus princept. — → ; quoddam (A) impertiendæ → quoddam impertiendæ; 701 9. Fidelium electionis typus. Ecclesiœ navis. — → ; ScrÎba doctor legis, infideles adumbrat. Vulpes; pseudoprophetœ. Volucres cœti, dœmones. Caput Christi Deus. Omnes in Ecclesiam invitati. — → ; autem 703 Dominum → autem Dominum.
Extrabiblical texts: Sir 17:17 (Sirach [in RC, EO, ETH canons]; allusion)
Cite (SBL): Hilary, Comm. Matt. 7 (PL 9:953–957; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/hilary-commentarius-matthaeum/7/#p-7). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-hilary-commentarius-matthaeum-7) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the PL 9 text; checked afterwards, privately, against the modern English translation (FOTC 125), which is not quoted or reproduced. No public-domain English exists.
Chapter 8
8PL 9:957–961
El ascendente eo in naviculam, seculi sunt eum discipun. El ecce tempestas magna facta est in mari, et reliqua. Navem discipulis introgressis tempestas oritur, mare commovetur, navigantes turbantur. Ipse verosomno consopitus timentium metu excitatur, oratur ut orem afferat. Et increpitis iis quod modicæ essent fidei, vento et mari tranquillitatem imperavit, cum admiratione hominum præceptis ejus ventum et mare obedissc. Igitur secundum hæc. ecclesiæ, intra quas verbum Dei non vigilaverit, naufragæ sunt: non quod Christus in somnum relaxetur, sed quod somno nostro consopiatur in nobis. Maxime autem illud accidit, ut a Deo praecipue in periculi metu et vexalionc speremus. Atque utinam vel spes sera confidal sese periculum posse evadere, Christi intra se virtulo vigilante. Perpetuam autem nobis objurgationis suæ recordationem reliquit, dicens: Modicœ fidei, quid timidi estis? metum scilicet motuum sæcularium, cum quibus Christi fides vigilet, nullum. esse oportere. Consequitur deindc hominum admiratio dicenlium: Qualis hie homo est, quod venti el mare obediunt ei? Non discipulorum hic sermo, sed gentium est. Nam cum superius et discipulos tantum navem introisse, et a discipulis tantum excitatum esse dixisset; nunc admiratos esse homines significat, hominibus hominem in ipsa admiraiione dicentibus. Qua nominum conversione intelligitur, omnia opera ChrisLi, omnesque ejus virtules ut Dei esse laudaudas: quia piaculi gentilis miserrimique erroris slultiliam demonstrat, quod eum ex humilitate passionis hominem potius nuncupent, quam ex virtutibus Deum. Et cum venisset tratis freturn in regionem Gerasenorum, occurrerunt ei duo homines dœmonia habentes de monumentis exeuntes, periculosi nimis, et reliqua. Duuin hominum occursus, dæmonum in duos homines longa possessio, et periculosa transeuntibus via, t:t transfugiendi in porcos deprecatio, et purgatis hominibus gregis ipsius per praeceps in mare casus, dehinc pastorum in oppidum fuga, populi de civitatc progressus, et ne urbem Dominus adiret legatio, el reditus ejus in patriam. et illic paralytici in lecto jacentis oblatio, et pro fidei merito in tempore ipso peccatorum remissio, et murmnr Scribarum, et virtutis conlcssio, et paralytici etiam sub onere lectuli in domum reditus, et hominum admiratio, hanc habent causam. In exordio generis humani in tres fuit humani generis divisio, Noe scilicet filios, ex quibus secundum prophctiam Genesis, Scin in possessionem Dei delectus est. Extra urbem autem, id est, extra legis et propbetarum synagogam, duos homines in monumentis dæmones detinebant: duarum scilicet gentium origines intra defunctorum sedes ctinortuorum reliquias obsederant, efficientes prætercuntibus viam vitac præsentis infestam. Igitur ut esset in rebus gerendis futuri plena meditatio, venienti Domino duo homines occurrunt: ut occursu eorum, concurrentium ad salutem voluntas indicarelur. Sed in hominibus daemoncs proclamant, cur sedem invideat, cur ante judicii lempus infestet. Adjacebat etiam eis duobus gentium populis plebs ex Sem genere Sadducaeorum, quorum hæresis ex Judæis negatæ resurrectionis piaculum est. Videntes igitur dæmones, non sibi jam locum in gentibus derelinqui, ut patiatur habitare se in hæreticis deprecantur: quibus occupatis, totus in mare impetu rapido per præceps grex coactus est: in cupiditatem scilicet sæcularem dæmonum præcipitantur instinctu, in aquis multis, id est, cum reliquarum gentium infidelitate morituri. Atque etiam in hoc typica ratio servata est, ut non satis esset dixisse præcipitatos in mare, nisi etiam adderetur, Et mortui sunt in aquis multis. Quorum principes atque pastores rerum talium admiratione turbati ad urbem veniunt, et quae gesta sunt nuntiant. Urbs illa Judaici populi habet speciem, quæ Clirisli operibus auditis, Domino suo obviam pergit, prohibens ne fines suos urbemque contingeret; neque enim Evangelia lex recipit: a qua repudiatus, in civitatem suam reverlitur. Deo civitas fidelium plebs est. In hanc igitur navi, id est Ecclesia, vectus introiit. Jamque in paralytico gentium universitas offertur medenda. Sed et curationis ipsius verba sunt contuenda. Non dicitur paralytico, Sanus esto; non dicitur, Surge el ambula; sed dicitur, Constans esto fili, remissa sunt tibi peccata tua. In Adam uno peccata universis gentibus remittuntur. Hie itaque Angelis ministrantibus curandus offerLur, hie filius nuncupaLur, quia primum Dei opus esl: huic remittuntur animæ peccata, et indulgenlia primae transgressionis ex venia est. Non enim paralyticum peccasse aliquid accepimus: cum prascrtim alio in loco idem Dominus dixerit, cæcitatem a nativitate non ex peccato aut proprio aut paterno fuisse contractam. Veritatis dcindc ordo succedit in gestis, quamvis futuri species cæpleaiur in dictis. Movet Scribas remissum ab homine peccatum: hominem enim tantum in Jesu Chrislo contuebantur. Et remissum est nb eo, quod lex laxare non poterat; fides enim sola justificai. Deinde murmuralionem eorum Dominus introspicil, dicitque facile esse filio hominis in terra peccata dimittere. Verum enim nemo potest dimillere peccata, nisi solus Dens: ergo qui remittit Deus est. Quia nemo remittit nisi Deus, Deus in homine manens curationem homini præstabat: et nulla ei agendi et loquendi erat difficultas, cui subest totum posse quod loquitur. Porro autem ut ipse esse in corpore positus intelligi posset, qui et animis peccata dimitteret, et resurrectionem corporibus præstaret; ait, Ut sciatis quoniam filius hominis habet potestatem in terra dimillere peccata, ait paralytico, Surge, et tolle lectum tuum.. Satis fuerat dixisse, Surge: sed quia omnis erat perficiendi operis ratio explicanda; adjecit, Tolte lectum tuum, el vade in domum tuam. Primnm remissionem trihuit peccati, deliine virtutem resurrectionis ostendit, turn sublatione lectuli infirmitatem ac dolorem corporibus docuit afuturum, postremo reditu in domum propriam iter in paradhum credentibus esse redhibendum, ex quo Adam parens universorum peccati labe dissolutus excesserat. Videntes autem turbœ limuerunt. Opus istud admiratio potius consequi, non melus debnit; sed manet clinm nunc ordo mysterii; ut veritati præsentium, futurorum species adjecla sil dictorum et factorum Domini virtutem turbæ timent. Magni enim timoris res est, non dimissis a Chrislo peccatis in mortem resolvi: quia nullus sit in domum aeternam rcdilus, si cui indulia non fuerit venia delictorum. Et honorificaverunt Deum, qui tantam dedit potestatem hominibus. Conclusa sunt omnia suo ordine, et cessante jam despcrationis timore honor Deo redditur, quod tantam dederit hominibus potestatem: sed soli hoc Christo erat debitum, soli de communione paternæ substantiæ hæc agere erat familiare. Non ergo hoc venit in admirationem, quod posset ista (quid enim non posse Deus credelur?); alioqnin laus de uno homine, non de pluribus exstitisset: sed delati Deo honoris hinc causa est, quod potestas hominibus ac via data sit per verbum ejus, et peccatorum remissionis, et corporum resurrectionis, et reversionis in coelum.
“And when he got into the boat, his disciples followed him. And behold, a great storm arose on the sea,” and the rest. When the disciples have entered the ship, a storm arises, the sea is stirred up, those sailing are troubled. He, sunk in sleep, is roused by the fear of the frightened and is begged to bring help. And having rebuked them for being of little faith, he commanded calm to the wind and the sea, the men marveling that wind and sea obeyed his commands. According to this, then, churches within which the word of God has not kept watch are shipwrecked: not that Christ relaxes into sleep, but that he is lulled to sleep in us by our sleep. And this happens most of all, that we hope in God chiefly in fear of danger and in distress. And would that even a late hope may trust that it can escape the danger, the power of Christ keeping watch within it. He left us a perpetual remembrance of his rebuke, saying: “You of little faith, why are you afraid?”, meaning that there should be no fear of worldly upheavals for those with whom the faith of Christ keeps watch. Then follows the wonder of the men, saying: “What kind of man is this, that the winds and the sea obey him?” This speech is not the disciples’ but the nations’. For whereas above he had said that only the disciples entered the ship and that he was roused only by the disciples, now he indicates that men marveled, men calling him a man in their very wonder. By this change of names it is understood that all the works of Christ and all his powers are to be praised as God’s: because it shows the folly of pagan guilt and most wretched error that they call him a man from the humility of the passion rather than God from his powers. “And when he had come across the sea into the region of the Gerasenes, two men possessed by demons met him, coming out of the tombs, very dangerous,” and the rest. The meeting of the two men; the long possession of two men by demons; the road dangerous to passers-by; the entreaty to pass over into the pigs; the fall of that herd headlong into the sea after the men were cleansed; then the flight of the herdsmen into the town; the coming out of the people from the city; the embassy asking that the Lord not enter the city; his return to his own country; and there the bringing of a paralytic lying on a bed; the forgiveness of sins at that very time for the merit of faith; the murmuring of the scribes; the confession of his power; the paralytic’s return home even under the burden of his bed; and the wonder of the men: these have this cause. At the beginning of the human race there was a threefold division of mankind, namely into the sons of Noah, of whom, according to the prophecy of Genesis, Shem was chosen for God’s possession. Outside the city, that is, outside the synagogue of the law and the prophets, demons held two men in the tombs: they had besieged, that is, the origins of two nations in the dwellings of the dead and the remains of the departed, making the road of present life dangerous for passers-by. So, in order that there might be in the events a full meditation of the future, two men meet the Lord as he comes: so that by their meeting the will of those running together to salvation might be indicated. But the demons in the men cry out, asking why he grudges them their seat and why he harasses them before the time of judgment. Next to these two peoples of the nations lay also a people of the race of Shem, the Sadducees, whose heresy among the Jews is the guilt of denying the resurrection. So the demons, seeing that no place is now left for them among the nations, beg that he allow them to dwell in the heretics: when these are occupied, the whole herd is driven headlong into the sea with a rapid rush: that is, they are cast down into worldly desire at the prompting of the demons, in many waters, that is, to die together with the unbelief of the remaining nations. And in this too the typological meaning was kept, that it was not enough to have said they were cast into the sea, without adding, “And they died in many waters.” Their leaders and herdsmen, troubled by wonder at such things, come to the city and announce what was done. That city bears the figure of the Jewish people, which, having heard of the works of Christ, goes out to meet its Lord, forbidding him to touch its borders and city; for the law does not receive the Gospels. Rejected by it, he returns to his own city. To God the city is the faithful people. Into this, then, he entered, carried by the ship, that is, the church. And now in the paralytic the whole of the nations is brought to be healed. But the words of the healing itself must be considered. It is not said to the paralytic, “Be healthy”; it is not said, “Rise and walk”; but it is said: “Take heart, son, your sins are forgiven you.” In one Adam sins are forgiven to all the nations. So he is brought to be healed by angels ministering; he is called son because he is God’s first work; to him the sins of the soul are forgiven, and the indulgence of the first transgression comes from pardon. For we have not received that the paralytic had sinned at all: especially since in another place the same Lord said that blindness from birth had not been contracted from sin, either his own or his father’s. Then the order of truth follows in the events, though the image of the future is fulfilled in the words. It troubles the scribes that sin was forgiven by a man: for they saw in Jesus Christ only a man. And it was forgiven by him, which the law could not loosen; for faith alone justifies. Then the Lord looks into their murmuring and says that it is easy for the Son of Man to forgive sins on earth. For truly no one can forgive sins but God alone: therefore he who forgives is God. Since no one forgives but God, God remaining in a man was supplying healing to a man; and there was no difficulty in doing and speaking for him in whom lies the whole power of what he says. Moreover, so that it might be understood that he, placed in the body, both forgives sins to souls and supplies resurrection to bodies, he says: “That you may know that the Son of Man has power on earth to forgive sins, he says to the paralytic: Rise and take up your bed.” It would have been enough to have said “Rise”; but since the whole reason of the work to be accomplished had to be unfolded, he added: “Take up your bed and go into your house.” First he granted forgiveness of sin; then he showed the power of resurrection; then, by the taking up of the bed, he taught that weakness and pain will be absent from bodies; finally, by the return to his own house, that the way into paradise is to be given back to believers, from which Adam, the parent of all, dissolved by the stain of sin, had gone out. “When the crowds saw it, they were afraid.” Wonder rather than fear ought to have followed this work; but the order of the mystery still remains, so that the image of the future is added to the truth of the present: the crowds fear the power of the Lord’s words and deeds. For it is a matter of great fear to be dissolved in death without sins forgiven by Christ, because there is no return into the eternal home for anyone to whom pardon of offenses has not been granted. “And they glorified God, who had given such power to men.” All things have been concluded in their order, and, the fear of despair now ceasing, honor is rendered to God because he has given such power to men: but this was owed to Christ alone; to him alone, from communion in the Father’s substance, it was natural to do these things. So it is not this that comes into wonder, that he could do these things (for what will God not be believed able to do?); otherwise the praise would have been about one man, not many; but the cause of the honor brought to God is that power and a way have been given to men through his word, of forgiveness of sins, of resurrection of bodies, and of return to heaven.
Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.
Matt 8:23–27 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 8:28–34 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 9:26–27 (allusion, medium confidence) · Matt 22:23 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 9:1–8 (quotation, high confidence) · John 9:3 (allusion, high confidence) · Mark 2:7 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The calming of the storm shows Christ watching over the church; the Gadarene demoniacs and the pigs figure the nations freed and the heretical Sadducees; the healing of the paralytic shows Christ as God forgiving sins and promising resurrection.
- Migne’s marginal headings, column numbers, footnote markers, references, and a variant-reading note are removed by logged corrections.
- Hilary identifies the herd of pigs with the Sadducees and the city that asks Jesus to leave with the Jewish people; polemic translated as written.
- “Faith alone justifies” (fides enim sola justificat) is Hilary’s phrase; translated as written.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne column number in the digital text; Migne footnote marker in the digital text; Migne's Scripture reference left in the text; Migne's marginal heading (editor's summary, not the author's text); Migne's variant-reading note left in the text): t. Chriitus quando el quanto periculo dormiat in nobis. — → ; imperavit, (n cum → imperavit, cum; Christi (A) intra → Christi intra; hominem 704 in → hominem in; Dœmones e gentibus expulsi hareticos obtinent. Christus a Judœs repudialus ABIT AD GENTES. — → ; gentium 705 infidelitate → gentium infidelitate; (Matth. IX, i) → ; fuerat 706 dixisse → fuerat dixisse; (at. abfuturum ) → .
Topics: Christology, Heresy
Cite (SBL): Hilary, Comm. Matt. 8 (PL 9:957–961; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/hilary-commentarius-matthaeum/7/#p-8). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-hilary-commentarius-matthaeum-8) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the PL 9 text; checked afterwards, privately, against the modern English translation (FOTC 125), which is not quoted or reproduced. No public-domain English exists.
Chapter 9
9PL 9:961–965
El cum transiret inde Jesus, vidit hominem sedenlem in teloneo Matthœum nomine, et ail illi, Sequere me, etreliqua. Matthæum publicanum sedentem in teloneo sequi se jubct. Et concedens in domum convivium instruit, et cum co publicanorum et peccatorum turba discumbil: Pharisæis discipulos objurgantibus, cur magistro cum publicanis cibus esset. Quibus respondet, Sanis medico opus non esse, sed curatione xgroios indigere: euntesque jubet discere quid sit, Misericordiam volo quam sacrtficium. Publicanoruin nomen ex vita est, qui relictis legis operibus, geiere se usu communi et publico maluerunt. Ergo ex domo, id est, ex peccatis corporis, Matthæum Dominus evocavit, in cujus mentem ingressus recumbit. Hie enim idem Evangelii istius scriptor est, et de peccati sui domo exiens, Dominum ipse suscepit, interiore ejus habitatione illuminatus, intra quem evangelicis cibis peccaloribus et publicanis convivium divite copia præparatur. Æmulatio deinde agitat Judæos, Dominum publicanis et peccatoribus communicare. Quibus ille operla infidelitalis vetantine verba legis exprompsil, se quidem ægrotis orem ferre et medicinam egentibus præstare; eis autem, qui se sanos existimarent, necessariatu curationem nullam esse. Sed ut intelligerent, neminem suorum sanum esse; admonuit ut discerent quid est, Misericordiam volo, non sacrificium: legem scilicet, sacrificiorum observationc devinctam, orem ferre non posse; sed salutent universis in misericordix indulgentia reservari. Non enim veni justos vocare, sed peccatores in pænitentiam. Omnibus venerat; quomodo ergo non se juslis venisse dicit? Erant ergo quibus necesse non erat ut veni ret? Sed nemo justus ex lege est. Ostendit ergo ina-, item justitiæ esse jactantiam: quia sacrificiis infirmibus ad salutem, misericordia erat universis in lege positis necessaria. Nam si justitia fuisset ex lege, venia pergraliam necessaria non fuisset. Tunc accesserunt ad eum Joannis ditcipuli dicentes, Quare nos et Pharisœi jejunamus frequenter, discipnli autem tui non jejunant? Jejunabant Pharisæi et discipuli Joannis, et Apostoli non jejunabant. Sed istis spiritaliter respondet, sponsumque se Joannis discipulis ostendit. Joannes enim repositam in Christo omnem vitæ spem spopondit; et recipi a Domino discipuli ejus adhuc eo prædicante non poterant. Usque in eum enim lex et prophetae sunt; et, nisi lege finita, in fidem evangelicam eorum nemo concederct. Quod vero præsente sponso jejunandi necessitatem discipulis non esse respondet; præsentiæ suæ gaudium, at sacrainentum sancti cibi edocet, quo nemo se præsente, id est, in conspectu mentis Cliristum continena, indigebit. Ablato autem se jejunaturos esse dicit: quia omnes non credentes resnrrexisse Christum, habituri non essent cilium vitæ. In fide enim resurrectionis sacramenium pania cœlestis accipitur: et quisquis sine Christo esi, in vitæ cibi jejunio relinquetur. Ut autem intelligerent, non posse sibi in veteribus posit is perfecta hæc salutis sacramenta commilti, comparationis posuit exemplum. Pannum rudem veslimento veteri non adsui, quia vetustatis inlirmitatem virtus adsumenti rudis dissolvat: et vinum novum veteribus utribus non infundi; ferventis enim musti calor utres veteres abrumpit: infirmas videlicet vetustate peccatorum eL animas et corpora, novae gratiæ sacramenta non capere. Fiet enim scissura pejor, effusoque vitio utres veteres peribunt. Duplex enim talium erit reatus, si præter vutustatem peccatorum tuorum virtutem novae gratis non suslinebunt: atque ideo et Pharisæos et discipntos Joannis nova non accepturos esse, nisi novi fierent. Hœe illo loquente, ecce princeps unus accessit, el adorabat eum, dicens, Domine, filia mea modo defuncta est, veni el pone manum super eam, etc.. Preces principis, fides mulieris, turbæ in domo conventus, et cæcorum duum clamor, muti et surdi et damoniaci oblatio, ex superioribus dictis connexæ sibi intelligentiæ tenent ordinem. Princeps bic, lex esse intelligitur; quae Dominum' orat pro plebe, quam ipsa Christo prædicata adventus ejus exspectatione nutriverat, ut vitam mortuæ reddat. Nam nullum principem credidisse legimus: ex quo persona principis hujus orantis merito in typum legis aptabitur. Cui quidem Dominus orem spopondit, nd quam pracstandam profectus est. Sed prior cum aposlolis peccatorum turba salvatur. Et cum primum electionem, quæ ex lege desLinabatur, vivere oporluisset: anterior tamen in mulieris specie salus publicanis et peccatoribus redditur. Hæc itaque ad Domini preiereuniis occursum tactu Testis Domini sanam se de profluvio sanguinis futuram esse confidit: sordibus scilicet polluta corporis sui, et interioris vitii immunditiis dissoluta, fimbriam vestis per Odem festinat attingere, donam videlicet Spiritus sancti, de Christi corpore modo fimbriæ exenntis, cum aposlolis conversata contingere; fitqne mox sana. Iia alteri salus, dum alii defertur, est reddita. Cujus idem et constantiam Dominus mox laudavit: quia quod Israeli parabatur, plebs gentium occupavit. Est autem In simplici intelligentia, magna virtutis dominicæ admiratio: cum potestas intra corpus manens rebus caducis efflcienlinm adderet sanitatis, et usque in vestium flmbrias operatio divina procederet. Non enim divisibilis etcomprehensibills erat Deus, ut corpore clauderetnr. Ipse enim dona in Spiritu dividit; cæterum non dividitur in donis. Virtutem autem ejus fides ubieum. que consequitur: quia ubique est, et nusquam abesL Et assumptio corporis non naturam Vinatis inclusit, sed ad redemptionem suam, fragilitatem corporis Virtus assumpsit: quae tarn infinita, tam libere est,, ut etiam in fimbriis ejus humanæ salutis operatio contineretur. lngrcdilur deinde Dominus domum principis, synagogam videlicet, cui In canticis legis hymnus luciuum personabal: et irridetur a plurimis. Numquam enim illi Deum in homine crediderunt, quin potius prædicari resurrectionem ex mortuis riserunt. Apprehensam igitur pucllam manu, cujus apud se mors erat somnus, retraxit ad vitam. Atque ut raros hinc esse ex lege credentium electionis numerus inlelligi posset, turba omnis expulsa est: quam utique s ilvari Dominus optasset; sed irridendo dicta gestaque ejus, resurrectionis non fuit digna consortio. Et exeunte fama in universam terram illam, post electionis salutem donnm Cliristi atque opera prædicantur. Exeunte igitur Domino, mox eaeci duo sequuntur. Sed caeci et egressum et nomen Domini quomodo scire potnerunt? Quin etiam et (illum David nuncupant, el salvari se rogant. In cæcis duobus ratio tolius superioris præfigurationis absolvitur. Ex his enim filia principis esse monstratur, Pbarisæl scilicet el discipuli Joannis, qui Dominum jam superius in commune tentaverant. His igitur nescientibus a quo salutem peterent, indicavit lex, et his salvaiorem suum in corpore ex David genere monstravil, et cæcis vetere peccato, quia Chrislum nisi admoniti non videbant, lumen mentis inseruit. Quibus Dominus, ostendens non cæ salute fidem, sed per fidem salutem exspeciandam (caeci enim quia crediderant viderunl. non quia viderant crediderunt: ex quo intelligendum csl fide merendum esse quod petitur, non ex impetratis fidem esse sumendam), si credidissent, visum pollicetur, et credentibus præstat, et silenlium imperat: quia apostolorum erat proprium prædicare. Quin etiam post hæc, in muto cl surdo ct dæmoniaco, gentium plebs iiidiga totius salutis offertur. Omnibus enim undique malls circumsessa, totius corporis vitiis implicabatur. Et in eo rerum ordo servatus est. Nam daemon prius ejscitur, et turn reliqua corporis officia succedunt. Dei quippe cognitione superstitionum omnium vesania efTugata, et visus et auditus et sermo salutis invehitur. Cujus facti admirationem talis turbæ est consecuta conrestio, Numquam sic apparuit in Israel: cum, cui per legem nihil afferri opis potuerat, verbi virtute salvari; quodque laudes Dei homo mutus surdusque loquertlur. Salute autem gentihus data, civitates omnes et castella omnia virtute et ingressu Christi illuminantur, et omnem infirmiiatem veternl languoris evadunt.
“And as Jesus passed on from there, he saw a man named Matthew sitting at the tax office, and said to him: Follow me,” and the rest. He commands Matthew the tax collector, sitting at the tax office, to follow him. And going into his house, he prepares a banquet, and a crowd of tax collectors and sinners reclines at table with him; the Pharisees rebuke the disciples, asking why their teacher eats with tax collectors. He answers them that the healthy have no need of a physician, but the sick need healing; and he commands them to go and learn what this means: “I desire mercy rather than sacrifice.” The name of tax collectors comes from their way of life: they abandoned the works of the law and preferred to conduct themselves by common and public custom. So the Lord called Matthew out of his house, that is, out of the sins of the body, and entering his mind he reclines there. For this is the same man who is the writer of this Gospel; and, going out of the house of his sin, he himself received the Lord, enlightened by his indwelling within, and within him a banquet of gospel foods is prepared in rich abundance for sinners and tax collectors. Then rivalry stirs the Jews, that the Lord shares with tax collectors and sinners. To them he brought out the words of the law, covered over by the veil of their unbelief: that he brings help to the sick and gives medicine to those in need; but for those who thought themselves healthy no healing was necessary. But so that they might understand that none of them was healthy, he warned them to learn what this means: “I desire mercy, not sacrifice”: namely, that the law, bound to the observance of sacrifices, could not bring help, but that salvation for all is reserved in the indulgence of mercy. “For I came not to call the righteous but sinners to repentance.” He had come for all; how, then, does he say that he has not come for the righteous? Were there, then, some for whom it was not necessary that he should come? But no one is righteous from the law. He shows, then, that the boasting of righteousness is empty: because, the sacrifices being powerless for salvation, mercy was necessary for all placed under the law. For if righteousness had been from the law, pardon through grace would not have been necessary. “Then the disciples of John came to him, saying: Why do we and the Pharisees fast often, but your disciples do not fast?” The Pharisees and John’s disciples fasted, and the apostles did not fast. But he answers them spiritually and shows himself to John’s disciples as the bridegroom. For John pledged that all the hope of life was stored in Christ; and his disciples could not yet be received by the Lord while he was still preaching. For the law and the prophets are until him; and, unless the law were ended, none of them would pass into the gospel faith. That he answers that his disciples have no need of fasting while the bridegroom is present teaches the joy of his presence and the mystery of the holy food, of which no one will be in need while he is present, that is, while holding Christ in the sight of the mind. But he says that when he is taken away they will fast: because all who do not believe that Christ has risen would not have the food of life. For in faith in the resurrection the mystery of the heavenly bread is received; and whoever is without Christ will be left in a fast from the food of life. And so that they might understand that these perfect mysteries of salvation could not be entrusted to them, set as they were in old things, he set out the example of a comparison. Unshrunk cloth is not sewn onto an old garment, because the strength of the raw patch would tear apart the weakness of the old; and new wine is not poured into old wineskins, for the heat of the fermenting must bursts old wineskins: that is, souls and bodies weakened by the age of sins do not hold the mysteries of new grace. For the tear will become worse, and, the wine spilled, the old wineskins will perish. For the guilt of such will be double, if, besides the age of their sins, they do not bear the power of the new grace: and so both the Pharisees and John’s disciples would not receive new things unless they became new. “While he was saying these things, behold, a ruler came and worshiped him, saying: Lord, my daughter has just died; come and lay your hand on her,” and so on. The ruler’s prayers, the woman’s faith, the gathering of the crowd in the house, the cry of the two blind men, and the bringing of the dumb, deaf, and demon-possessed man hold, from what was said above, an order of understanding connected with itself. This ruler is understood to be the law, which prays to the Lord for the people whom it had nourished, by preaching Christ, with the expectation of his coming, that he may give life back to the dead girl. For we read that no ruler believed: so the person of this ruler who prays will rightly be fitted to the figure of the law. To him the Lord promised help, and he set out to give it. But first the crowd of sinners is saved together with the apostles. And although the elect, who were destined from the law, ought first to have lived, yet before them, in the figure of the woman, salvation is given to tax collectors and sinners. So she, meeting the Lord as he passes by, trusts that by the touch of his garment she will be healed of her flow of blood: polluted, that is, by the filth of her body and dissolved by the uncleanness of inner vice, she hastens by faith to touch the fringe of the garment, that is, to touch, in company with the apostles, the gift of the Holy Spirit going out from the body of Christ like a fringe; and she is at once made whole. So health was given to one while it was being brought to another. And the Lord at once praised her constancy too: because the people of the nations seized what was being prepared for Israel. In the simple understanding, too, there is great wonder at the Lord’s power: since the power remaining within the body added the efficacy of health to perishable things, and the divine working went out even to the fringes of his garments. For God was not divisible and containable, so as to be shut in by a body. For he himself divides gifts in the Spirit, but is not divided in the gifts. Faith attains his power everywhere, because he is everywhere and absent nowhere. And the assumption of the body did not enclose the nature of the power; rather, the Power took up the frailty of the body for its redemption: a Power so infinite and so free that the working of human salvation was contained even in its fringes. Then the Lord enters the ruler’s house, that is, the synagogue, in which, in the songs of the law, a hymn of mourning was sounding; and he is mocked by many. For they never believed God to be in a man; rather, they laughed at the preaching of the resurrection from the dead. So he took the girl by the hand, whose death was sleep in his sight, and drew her back to life. And so that it might be understood that the number of the elect who believe from the law is small, the whole crowd was put out: which the Lord would certainly have wished to be saved; but, by mocking his words and deeds, it was not worthy of fellowship in the resurrection. “And the report went out into all that land”: after the salvation of the elect, the gift and works of Christ are proclaimed. So as the Lord goes out, two blind men at once follow. But how could the blind know both of the Lord’s going out and his name? And they even call him Son of David and ask to be saved. In the two blind men the reason of the whole preceding prefiguration is completed. For the ruler’s daughter is shown to be from these, namely the Pharisees and John’s disciples, who had already, above, tested the Lord together. To these, not knowing from whom they should seek salvation, the law pointed him out and showed them their Savior in the body, of the line of David; and on those blind from ancient sin, because they did not see Christ unless they were reminded, he placed the light of the mind. To them the Lord, showing that faith is not to be expected from health but health through faith (for the blind saw because they had believed, not believed because they had seen; from which it must be understood that what is asked for is to be earned by faith, not faith taken up from what has been obtained), promises sight if they believed, gives it to them as they believe, and commands silence, because preaching belonged properly to the apostles. And after this, in the dumb and deaf and demon-possessed man, the people of the nations, in need of complete salvation, is brought. For, beset on every side by all evils, it was entangled in the vices of the whole body. And in this the order of events was kept. For the demon is cast out first, and then the other offices of the body follow. For when the madness of all superstitions has been put to flight by the knowledge of God, sight, hearing, and the speech of salvation are brought in. Wonder at this deed was followed by this confession of the crowd: “Nothing like this has ever appeared in Israel”: since one whom the law could give no help was saved by the power of the word, and since a dumb and deaf man spoke the praises of God. And when salvation has been given to the nations, all the cities and all the villages are enlightened by the power and entry of Christ and escape every weakness of the old sickness.
Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.
Matt 9:9–13 (quotation, high confidence) · Hos 6:6 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 9:14–17 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 11:13 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 9:18–26 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 12:11 (allusion, medium confidence) · Matt 9:27–31 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 9:32–35 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Matthew’s call and banquet, the question about fasting, the patches and wineskins, the ruler’s daughter and the woman with the flow of blood, the two blind men, and the mute demoniac are read as figures of grace to sinners, the law, and the nations.
- Migne’s marginal headings, column numbers, references, and a conjectural note (f. in se) are removed by logged corrections.
- Hilary says “no ruler believed” and identifies the ruler with the law and the synagogue; translated as written.
- The phrase “the mystery of the heavenly bread is received in faith in the resurrection” may refer to the Eucharist; translated as written.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne column number in the digital text; Migne column number, paragraph number, and marginal heading (editor's summary, not the author's text); Migne's Scripture reference left in the text; Migne's conjectural note left in the text; Migne's marginal heading (editor's summary, not the author's text); stray mark and split word in the digital text): Misericordiam 707 volo → Misericordiam volo; ipse (f. in se) suscepit → ipse suscepit; (Ibid. H) → ; nemi* nem → neminem; 7084. Hunc cilium non percipit vetus homo. — → ; Princeps fillœ vitam deprecans, legis typus. — → ; (lb. 18) → ; efflcienlinm 709 adderet → efflcienlinm adderet; Judwi resurrectionem rident. Pauci ex eis credituri. — → ; surdo 710 ct → surdo ct.
Topics: Fasting
Cite (SBL): Hilary, Comm. Matt. 9 (PL 9:961–965; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/hilary-commentarius-matthaeum/7/#p-9). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-hilary-commentarius-matthaeum-9) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the PL 9 text; checked afterwards, privately, against the modern English translation (FOTC 125), which is not quoted or reproduced. No public-domain English exists.