Latin Translation of Basil's Hexaemeron 0.1–1.11
Latin text: PL 53 (Latin text: Migne, Patrologia Latina, vol. 53, digitized by Open Greek and Latin (patrologia_latina-dev, University of Leipzig), CC BY-SA 4.0).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0).
Preface
0.1PL 53
Religiosus, simulque studiosus animus tuæ germanitatis, dum plenitudinem cælestium nosse desiderat Scripturarum, cunctas bibliothecas ecclesiasticas et earum qui fuerint conditores, crebris lectionibus investigans, pervenit tandem ad Hexaemeron sancti ac venerabilis episcopi Basilii, Græco sermone conscriptum: quod dum monumentis inserere linguæ Latialis affectat, mihi hanc curam censuit esse mandandam. Sed ego considerans, quia hoc amore potius quam judicio præcepisti: festinabam quidem simplicibus jussis obsequi, tua commonitus caritate: sed promittere non audebam, propriam contemplatus infantiam. Itaque gemina cogitatione distractus quid agerem nesciebam: terebar enim si negare maluissem, mentem pie de me præsumentis offendere. Si parere, susceptum officium navare non posse. Quæ cum ita essent, statui magis operam meam fideliter exhibere, quam sermonem pertinaciter excusare: confidens quia si displicuero, dabis veniam quæ jussisti. Non enim meo vitio sed tuo judicio, quod evenerit imputabis: mihi satis est peregisse mandata.
Your Fraternity's mind, devout and studious alike, longing to know the fullness of the heavenly Scriptures, searched through all the church libraries and their founders with constant reading, and came at last to the Hexaemeron of the holy and venerable bishop Basil, written in the Greek tongue. Wishing to place it among the monuments of the Latin language, you judged that this task should be entrusted to me. But I, considering that you gave this command out of love rather than judgment, was eager indeed to obey your simple orders, urged by your charity, yet did not dare to promise, seeing my own lack of eloquence. So, pulled two ways in thought, I did not know what to do: I feared that if I chose to refuse, I would offend the mind of one who devoutly presumed well of me; if I chose to obey, that I could not carry out the duty I had undertaken. This being so, I decided rather to offer my service faithfully than to excuse my style stubbornly, trusting that if I displease, you who commanded it will pardon me. For you will impute whatever comes of it not to my fault but to your own judgment; it is enough for me to have carried out your commands.
Notes and citation
Summary: Eustathius dedicates his Latin version of Basil's Hexaemeron to the one who asked him to make it, excusing his lack of eloquence.
- Dedication of the translator, Eustathius, which has no counterpart in Basil's Greek. 'Your Fraternity' renders tuae germanitatis, an address to a brother or sister; the addressee is traditionally identified as Syncletica, but the text does not name her.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR; OCR misreading of B): Dasilii → Basilii; nOR audebam → non audebam; vition sed → vitio sed.
Cite (SBL): Eustathius, Hex. 0.1 (PL 53; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/eustathius-hexaemeron-metaphrasis/0-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/eustathius-hexaemeron-metaphrasis/0-1
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-eustathius-hexaemeron-metaphrasis-0-1) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of the staged edition (digital text; corrections logged). No public-domain English translation exists and no FOTC volume covers this work, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
Chapter 1
1.1PL 53
In principio fecit Deus cælum et terram. Conveniens exordium de mundi compositione narraturus assumpsit decorationem gestorum operum, sui faciens sermonis initium. Coeli enim terraque factura referenda est non sponte formata, ut quidam opinali sunt, sed ex Deo causas propriæ e nacta substantiæ. Qualis igitur auditus dignus sit magnitudine relatorum, vel quemadmodum instructus esse debeat animus, ad rerum ejusmodi perceptionem! nimirum qui vitiis carnalibus est immunis, et ærumnis minime sæcularibus obfuscalus, quin etiam laboriosus et solers, et omnia circumspectans, ut. meritam Dei notionem possit attrahere. Sed antequam de verbo- rum subtilitate disceptemus, et perscrutemur quanta sit harum vocum significatio, cogitemus quis est qui nos affatur. Nam licet altiludine cordis historici non valeamus attingere propter imbecillitatem no. stri videlicet intellectus: attamen praerogativa loquentis inspecta, ultro ad consentiendum his qum dicta sunt adducemur. Moyses itaque est editor hujusce scripture, Moyses ille qui perhibetur venustus apud Deum fuisse, cum adhuc maternis uberibu; inhiaret, quem adoptavit filia Pharaonis. et regio cultu liberaliter educavii, philosophis Ægyptiorum eruditioni cjus magistris adhibitis (Act. VII, 22), qui fastum tyrannidis exhorruit, et ad humilitatem suorum civium se convertit, contentus a afflictari potius cum populo Dei, quam fructum peccati capere temporalem. Qui armorem justitiæ de ipsa natura sortitus est, quippe qui priusquam plebis acciperet principatum, propter odium nequitiæ naturale, usque ad necem videtur improbos persecutus. Qui ab his effugatus est, quibus ipse fuerat opitulatus: qui libentissime tumultibus Ægypti derelictis, ad Æthiopiam profectus est, ibique cæterorum vacuus negoti rum, per annos quadraginta rerum contempla- tioni dans operam, octogesimumque aetatis agens an um, vidit Deum, ut erat homini videre possibile, imo ut.ini potius licuit alii, secundum testimonium ipsius Dei: Quia si fuerit propheta quis vestrum Domino, proprie per visum ei cognoscar, et per sOmnium loquar: sed non ita famulus meus Moyses, q'ii in onmi domo mea fidelis est. Ore ad os colloquar ei: in specie, et non per figuram ( Num. XII, 6-8). Hic itaque qui in potiendis præsentibus Dei conspectibus, angelis fuerat coicquatus; quæ auscultavit a Deo disserit nobis. Audiamus igitur veritatem verborum, non in persuasione humanæ sapientiæ, sed in probatissimis spiritalis doctrinæ sermonibus, quorum finis non audientium laus est, sed discentium salus.
"In the beginning God made heaven and earth." The one who was about to narrate the composition of the world took up a fitting opening: he made the order of the works accomplished the beginning of his discourse. For the making of heaven and earth must be reported as not formed spontaneously, as some have supposed, but as having obtained the causes of its own substance from God. What hearing, then, is worthy of the greatness of the things related, or how prepared should the mind be for the perception of such matters! Surely it must be free from the vices of the flesh and in no way darkened by the cares of the world; it must also be diligent and alert and look round on all things, so that it may be able to draw to itself a worthy notion of God. But before we discuss the precision of the words and search out how great the meaning of these expressions is, let us consider who it is that speaks to us. For although, because of the weakness of our understanding, we cannot reach the depth of the historian's heart, yet when we look at the authority of the speaker we shall be led of our own accord to assent to what has been said. Moses, then, is the author of this scripture: that Moses who is said to have been beautiful before God while he was still hungry at his mother's breasts; whom Pharaoh's daughter adopted and brought up generously with royal care, appointing the philosophers of the Egyptians as teachers for his education (Acts 7:22); who abhorred the pride of tyranny and turned to the lowliness of his fellow citizens, content "to be afflicted with the people of God rather than to enjoy the temporary fruit of sin"; who received the love of justice from nature itself, since even before he received the leadership of the people he is seen, through a natural hatred of wickedness, to have pursued the wicked even to death. He was driven away by those whom he himself had helped; he gladly left behind the tumults of Egypt and went off to Ethiopia, and there, free from other business, he gave himself for forty years to the contemplation of things; and in the eightieth year of his age he saw God, as far as it was possible for a man to see him, or rather as it was permitted to no one else, according to the testimony of God himself: "If there is a prophet of the Lord among you, I will make myself known to him in a vision and speak to him in a dream; but not so my servant Moses, who is faithful in all my house. Mouth to mouth I will speak with him, in appearance and not in riddles" (Num 12:6–8). This man, then, who in enjoying the present sight of God had been made equal to the angels, tells us what he heard from God. Let us therefore listen to the truth of the words, not in the persuasiveness of human wisdom, but in the most approved words of spiritual teaching, whose end is not the praise of the hearers but the salvation of the learners.
Gen 1:1 (quotation, high confidence) · Acts 7:20 (allusion, high confidence) · Acts 7:22 (allusion, high confidence) · Heb 11:25 (quotation, high confidence) · Exod 2:11–15 (allusion, high confidence) · Num 12:6–8 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 2:4 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Basil's first homily opens by commending Moses, the author of Genesis, as one who spoke with God face to face, and asks for hearers worthy of the subject.
- Gen 1:1. 'Beautiful before God' alludes to Acts 7:20; the education in Egyptian wisdom to Acts 7:22; the choice of affliction quotes Heb 11:25; the prophecy formula is Num 12:6–8 (Migne's references in parentheses are kept as printed). 'Not in the persuasiveness of human wisdom' echoes 1 Cor 2:4. Basil also has Moses go to Ethiopia (where Exodus has Midian).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR): fecit Deus carlum → fecit Deus cælum; narralurus → narraturus; debcat anitnus → debeat animus; fiiia Pharaonis → filia Pharaonis; pbilosopbis → philosophis.
Topics: Scripture and canon
Cite (SBL): Eustathius, Hex. 1.1 (PL 53; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/eustathius-hexaemeron-metaphrasis/1-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/eustathius-hexaemeron-metaphrasis/1-1
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-eustathius-hexaemeron-metaphrasis-1-1) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of the staged edition (digital text; corrections logged). No public-domain English translation exists and no FOTC volume covers this work, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
1.2PL 53:869b
In principio fecit Deus cœlum et terram (Cen. I, 1). Retardat igitur sermonem meum mentis admiratio: cogitans quid primum dicam, vel unde capiam narrationis exordium, arguamne vanitatem sæcularium, aut nostrorum potius prædicem veritatem? Plurima super rerum natura Grecorum philosophi disputarunt: sed nullus apud eos sermo fixus habetur et stabilis, priore semper a sequente dejecto. Nihilque nobis operæ pretium est, quæ illoruin sunt infirmare: cum ad destructionem propriam sibimet ipsi sufficiant. a Qui coint Deum nescire potuerunt, sapientiam rebus præesse mortalium nullatenus concesserunt, sed familiari ignoratione sublapsi variis omnia definitionibus concluserunt. Propterea multi eorum ad confusam informemque se materiam redegerunt, elementis mundi causas omnium rerum deputantes. Alii atomos, et individua corpora, et tun;ores, et meatus continere naturam visibilium tradiderunt: modo concurrentibus sibi levibus illis rotundisque corpusculis, modo recedentibus a se at- que discretis, ortus obiturque perficere, ct in perseveratioribus corporibus complexionem atomorum locatam, validius causas xternitatis exprimere. Vere telam araneae texunt, qui ista describunt: et qui tam vacua inaniaque principia, cœlo, terræ, marique conscribunt. Neque enim sciebant dicere: In principio fecit Deus cœlum et terram: propterea sine e moderamine, et gubernatione, fortuitoque casu. agi et ferri omnia, insito sibi impietatis decepti errore, dixerunt. QuoJ ne nos quoque pateremur, primis statim suæ narrationis elogiis mundi fabrica- tionis expositor, Dei commemoratione sensus nostros illuminans, dixit: In principio fecit Deus. Quam bonus ordo principium \ mimo posuit: ut non ingenitum quidam mundum arbitrarentur. Deinde subdidit, quia fecit: ut ostenderet quia creatura opus, pars exigua virtutis est conditoris. Nam sicut ligulus, vasis deformatis, nec artem potest amittere, nec virtutem: sic opifex reruin Deus, non uni facturae sufficientem potentiam possidens, sed infinitate penitus excedens, solo momento propriae voluntatis, magnitudinem eorum quæ cernuntur exstruxit. Quod si et principium mundus habet, et factus est; quære quis illi dedit principium, et quis ejus fabricator est. Quod ne humana forsitan cogitatione discutiens, a veritati tramite deviares: prævenit instruens nos doctrinis. et animis nostris, tanquam signaculum cujusdam custodiæ figens, venerabile mox Dei nomen inseruit dicens: In principio fecit Deus. Igitur beata natura,et opulenta bonitas, dilectissimaque cunctis rationem, habentibus, ac nimium carissima pulchritudo, princeps omnium quæ sunt, fons vitæ, intelligibile lumen, inaccessibilis sapientia, Ipse fecit in principio cælum et terram.
"In the beginning God made heaven and earth" (Gen 1:1). The wonder of my mind holds back my speech, as I consider what I should say first, or where I should take the beginning of my account: should I refute the vanity of the worldly, or rather proclaim the truth of our own? The philosophers of the Greeks argued a great deal about the nature of things, but among them no account is held fixed and stable, the earlier one always being overthrown by the one that follows. It is not worth our while to refute their views, since they are sufficient for their own destruction. Those who could not know God did not in any way grant that wisdom presides over the things of mortals; slipping into an ignorance that was natural to them, they enclosed everything in various definitions. Therefore many of them reduced themselves to a confused and formless matter, assigning the causes of all things to the elements of the world. Others taught that atoms, indivisible bodies, masses, and passages make up the nature of visible things: that those light, round little bodies, now coming together, now drawing apart and separating from one another, bring about births and deaths, and that in more lasting bodies the combination of the atoms is set more firmly and expresses more strongly the causes of their duration. Truly they weave a spider's web who describe such things, and who assign such empty and vain principles to heaven, earth, and sea. For they did not know how to say, "In the beginning God made heaven and earth"; therefore, deceived by the error of impiety implanted in them, they said that all things are driven and carried along without direction or government, by chance. So that we might not suffer this as well, the expositor of the making of the world, in the very first words of his narrative, lighting up our minds with the mention of God, said: "In the beginning God made." What a good order: he set the beginning first, so that no one might think the world unbegotten. Then he added "made," to show that the creation is a work, a small part of the Creator's power. For as the potter, after shaping vessels, loses neither his art nor his power, so God, the maker of things, possessing a power not merely sufficient for one creation but exceeding it infinitely, built the greatness of the things that are seen by a single moment of his own will. But if the world has a beginning and was made, ask who gave it its beginning and who its maker is. Lest perhaps, by examining this with human reasoning, you should stray from the path of truth, he forestalled you by instructing us with teaching, and, fixing the venerable name of God in our minds like the seal of a guard, he inserted it at once, saying: "In the beginning God made." Therefore the blessed nature, the rich goodness, the beauty most beloved and exceedingly dear to all who have reason, the principle of all that exists, the fountain of life, the intelligible light, the inaccessible wisdom: he himself made heaven and earth in the beginning.
Gen 1:1 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Against the Greek philosophers who ascribe the world to matter, atoms, or chance, Moses names God at once as the maker who gave the world a beginning.
- The atomists (Democritus, Epicurus) are described without being named. 'Qui coint' in the digital text is read as 'qui cum' (uncertain).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR): sufliciant → sufficiant; terne, marique → terræ, marique; guhernationc → gubernatione; fons vitne → fons vitæ.
Cite (SBL): Eustathius, Hex. 1.2 (PL 53:869b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/eustathius-hexaemeron-metaphrasis/1-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/eustathius-hexaemeron-metaphrasis/1-2
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-eustathius-hexaemeron-metaphrasis-1-2) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of the staged edition (digital text; corrections logged). No public-domain English translation exists and no FOTC volume covers this work, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
1.3PL 53:870b
Non ergo infecta esse vel improvida quæ videntur opineris, o homo; nec quia circum te discurrunt ea quae moventur in coelo, nec quod ipsius circuli initium, nostro sensui comprehensibile non habetur, idcirco sine principio esse vertibilium corporum natura credenda est. Neque enim orbis iste, id est, planum hoc rotundumque schema, quod sub uno pundo continetur, quia nostrum diffugit intellectum, nec unde coeperit, aut quo reciderit possumus invenire: ob hoc etiam non esse compositum debemus asserere, aut quia sensus omnino nostros elabitur, ideo revera " minus aliunde cœpisse putabitur. Sic et tu non quia in semetipsa feruntur ea quæ volvenda circumspicis, et quod planities eorum nullis mediis interponatur obstaculis, ob hoc sine principio vel line mundum haberi decipiaris. Transi' enim schema ejus (I Cor. VII, 31); et, cœlum terraque præteribit (Matth. XXIV, 31): praedicatio autem cunctorum de consummatione sæculi mandatorum, et de reformatione mundi, secundum notationem magisterii spiritalis, ex his quae in præsentia brevitcr tradita sunt declaratur. In principio fecit Deus coelum et terram. Omnia quæ ex tempore cœperunt, necesse est tempore terminari. Si est initium temporale, de fine non dubites. Geometrica et arithmetica disciplina, commentitiæque scripturae, et fabulosa astrologia, id est occupatissima vanitas. Ad qualem igitur terminum concludenda est, cum ii qui circa memoratarum rerum indaginem vacaverunt, coæternum creatori omnium Deo, visibilem hunc mundum esse pronuntiant, ad illius gloriam referentes circumscriptum hunc orbem, corpusque habentem compositum, quæ est incomprehensibilis invisibilisque natura? Qui ne hoc quidem perspicere potuerunt: quia cui singula membra solutioni corruptelæque subjecta sunt, ejus etiam universum corpus iisdem casibus interire necesse est. Sed usque adeo cogitationibus evanuerunt, et excæcatum est irrationabile cor eorum, dicentesque se esse sapientes, stulti prorsus effecti sunt (Rom. I,21,22), ut etiam quidam eorum sempiternum esse cum Deo polum, et sine principio ac fine baberi, rerumque per partes e institutarum auctorem # dispensatoremque esse audeant affirmare.
Do not suppose, then, O man, that the things that are seen are unmade or unprovided for; and do not believe that the nature of revolving bodies is without beginning because the things that move in the heaven run round about you, or because the beginning of the circle itself is not perceptible to our senses. For this orb, that is, this flat and round figure that is contained within one boundary, escapes our understanding, and we cannot find where it began or where it ends; yet we must not on that account assert that it was not composed; nor, because it entirely escapes our senses, is it therefore to be thought not to have begun from anywhere. So you too should not be deceived into holding that the world has no beginning or end because the things you see revolving are carried round upon themselves, and their surface is interrupted by no intervening obstacles. For "its form passes away" (1 Cor 7:31), and "heaven and earth will pass away" (Matt 24:35). The proclamation of all the commandments concerning the consummation of the age and the renewal of the world is made known, according to the indication of the spiritual teaching, from what has been briefly handed down at present: "In the beginning God made heaven and earth." All things that began in time must end in time. If there is a beginning in time, do not doubt the end. Geometry and arithmetic, invented writings, and fabulous astrology are a very busy vanity. To what end, then, must one conclude it comes, when those who devoted themselves to the investigation of these subjects declare that this visible world is coeternal with God the Creator of all, ascribing to his glory this circumscribed orb, which has a composite body, though his is an incomprehensible and invisible nature? They could not see even this: that a whole body whose individual members are all subject to dissolution and corruption must itself perish by the same accidents. But they became so vain in their thoughts, and their senseless heart was so darkened, and claiming to be wise they became so utterly foolish (Rom 1:21–22), that some of them even dare to affirm that the heaven is eternal with God, has neither beginning nor end, and is the author and governor of the things arranged part by part.
Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.
1 Cor 7:31 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 24:35 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 1:1 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 1:21–22 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The world's circular motion does not prove it eternal: what began in time will end, and the philosophers who made the world coeternal with God became fools.
- Migne prints 'Matth. XXIV, 31'; the saying is Matt 24:35. The sentence on geometry, arithmetic and astrology is abrupt in the Latin; Basil's Greek speaks of the philosophers' learning in these sciences as a 'laborious vanity'.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR): comprebensibile → comprehensibile; aflirmare → affirmare.
Topics: Eschatology
Cite (SBL): Eustathius, Hex. 1.3 (PL 53:870b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/eustathius-hexaemeron-metaphrasis/1-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/eustathius-hexaemeron-metaphrasis/1-3
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-eustathius-hexaemeron-metaphrasis-1-3) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of the staged edition (digital text; corrections logged). No public-domain English translation exists and no FOTC volume covers this work, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
1.4PL 53:871b
Quibus, ubi, vel quando sapientia sæcularis, formidinem futurae condemnationis initiet, qui sic acute res vanissimas intuentes, ad concipiendam veritatis prudentiam, sponte cæcati sunt. Alii stellarum intervalla dinumerant, earumque arctoas semper lucentes describunt, et quantae illarum quæ sub axe moventur australi, a certis quidem suspiciuntur hominibus, nobis autem habentur ignotæ. Vel borealem latitudinem, nec non signiferum circulum mille spatiis dividentes, astrorumque discursus, et præclusiones, et omnium motus principales subtiliter observantes, et post quantum temporis, unaquæque planetarum propriam circuitionem solet explere: unam omnium rationem reperire minime potuerunt, ut dicerent Deum mundi totius esse factorem, justoque judicio dignam remunerationem cuique pro suis facinoribus tributurum. Qui nec futuræ examinationis intuitu, congruam cogitationem de rerum omnium fine ceperunt: considerantes, quia mundum quoque reformari necesse est, si ad aliud vitæ schema animorum status transferendus est. Sicut enim præsens vita cognatam habet mundi hujus naturam: ita et futura animorum conversatio familiarem speciei suæ sumptura est habitum. Sed tantum absunt credere quod hæc vera sint, ut passim de nobis rideant, cum mundi hujus consummationem et reformationem saeculi praedicamus. Sane quoniam naturaliter omnium rerum sunt prima principia, idcirco super his quae ex tempore coeperunt, scriptor disserens hanc vocem præmisit dicens: In principio fecit.
When, where, or with what will worldly wisdom begin to fear the coming condemnation, when those who look so keenly at the vainest things have of their own accord become blind to conceiving the understanding of truth? Some count up the distances of the stars and describe those of the north that always shine, and how many of those that move under the southern pole are seen by certain people but are unknown to us. Or they divide the northern latitude and the zodiac into a thousand spaces, and minutely observe the courses of the stars, their occultations, and the chief motions of them all, and after how long each of the planets usually completes its own circuit. Yet they could not find the one reason of all, so as to say that God is the maker of the whole world and will render to each, by just judgment, a worthy recompense for his deeds. Nor, with a view to the coming examination, did they form a fitting thought about the end of all things, considering that the world too must be renewed if the state of souls is to be transferred to another form of life. For as the present life has a nature akin to this world, so the future life of souls will take a condition suited to its own kind. But they are so far from believing that these things are true that they laugh at us everywhere when we proclaim the consummation of this world and the renewal of the age. Since the first principles are by nature the beginnings of all things, the writer, discussing the things that began in time, set this word first, saying: "In the beginning he made."
Gen 1:1 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Astronomers who measure the stars minutely failed to see that God made the world and will judge it, and mock the Christian hope of its renewal.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR): vauissimas → vanissimas; dinumcrant → dinumerant; spa- His → spatiis; observautes → observantes.
Topics: Eschatology
Cite (SBL): Eustathius, Hex. 1.4 (PL 53:871b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/eustathius-hexaemeron-metaphrasis/1-4). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/eustathius-hexaemeron-metaphrasis/1-4
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-eustathius-hexaemeron-metaphrasis-1-4) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of the staged edition (digital text; corrections logged). No public-domain English translation exists and no FOTC volume covers this work, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
1.5PL 53:872a
Erat enim quaedam, ut vides, ante hunc mundum substantia intellectui quidem nostro contemplabilis, sed inaudita relicta est: propterea quod ab his qui imbuebantur propter sensus parvitatem, facile comprehendi non poterat. Erat antiquissima creaturae ordinatio; illis quae extra mundum sunt, apta virtutibus, orta sine tempore, sempiterna sibique propria: in qua conditor omnium Deus opera cuncta constituit, id est, lumen intellectibile conveniens beatitudini amantium Dominum. Rationabiles, invisibilesque dico naturas, et omnium intellectibilium decorationem, quae capacitatem nostræ mentis excedunt, quorum nec vocabula reperire possibile est. Haec substantiam invisibilis mundi replevisse sciendum est, sicut docet nos Paulus dicens: Quia in ipso creata sunt omnia, sive visibilia, sive invisibilia, sive throni, sive dominationes, sive principatus, sive potestates, seu virtutes (Col. I, 16), seu angelorum militiæ, seu archangelorum conventus. Cum vero De- cesse erat superduci rebus hunc mundum, qui est praecipue castigatio, et doctrina humanorum animorum, deinde cunctis quae oriuntur et occidunt, opportunum domicilium: tunc etiam decursio temporis, simul cum ipso mundo, et animantibus quæ in eo sunt, congenerata dignoscitur: eaque semper urgetur, et effluit, finemque nequaquam percipit commeandi. Aut non ejusmodi tempus esse dicimus, cujus pars quae emensa est non videtur, quæ autem ventura est necdum adfuit, quæ vero præsto est, antequam sensui nostro notescat, elabitur? Talis etiam natura gignentium est, aut crescens videlicet, aut decrescens: cujus stabilitas et fundatio nihil habet certi. a Paria fuerunt ergo animantium arbustorumque corpora, tanquam vi cujusdam torrentis ad necessitatem insitam relegata, et illi motui subjecta, qui al ortus obitusque perducit, et ex natura temporis continetur, cognatam proprietatem rebus mutabilibus possidente. Hinc consequenter relator exorsus est, manifeste de mundi constructione nos edocens, in principio fecisse Deum. Principium autem est quod ad tempus pertinet, non quod ad antiquitatem respicit, qua; est omnibus rebus anterior. Ergo non secundum eam dixit In principio fecit Deus, sed post illa invisibilia et intellectibilia initium generationis corum quae cernuntur, sensuque comprehenduntur, enarrat. Dicitur quidem principium, et prima motio: sicut principium recti itineris est justa facere (Prov. xvi, 5). Ex justis enim operibus incitamur ad beate vivendum. Dicitur etiam principium ejus rei quæ fit ex aliqua subsistente materia, sicut in domibus fundamentum, in navibus carina, et secundum quod dictum est: Initium sapientiæ timor Domini (Prov. i, 7). Etenim tanquam munimentum et fulcimentum quoddam ad lidei firmitatem, præfertur semper cum timore religio. Sed et structibilium operum prima pars principium nuncupatur: sicut sapientia Beselehel erga tabernaculi decus. Actuum quoque fit plerumque principium bonus exitus inceptorum: sicut in largitate miscricordiæ, sequitur prosperitas Dei, et in operatione virtutum, finis ille habetur, qui in promissionibus est locatus.
For there was, as you see, before this world a certain substance, contemplable indeed by our understanding, but left unspoken, because those who were being instructed could not easily grasp it on account of the smallness of their senses. There was a most ancient order of creation, suited to the powers that are outside the world, arising without time, everlasting and proper to itself, in which God, the Creator of all, established all his works: that is, an intelligible light suited to the blessedness of those who love the Lord. I mean the rational and invisible natures and the whole adornment of intelligible beings, which exceed the capacity of our mind, and whose names cannot even be found. These, we must know, filled the substance of the invisible world, as Paul teaches us, saying: "For in him all things were created, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or principalities or powers" (Col 1:16), or virtues, or the armies of angels, or the assemblies of archangels. But when it became necessary to bring this world in addition to these things, a world which is above all a school and training place for human souls, and also a fitting dwelling for all things that rise and pass away, then the course of time also is recognized as having been generated together with the world itself and the living things in it; and it is always pressing on and flowing away, and never reaches the end of its passage. Or do we not say that time is of such a kind that the part of it that has passed is not seen, the part that is to come is not yet present, and the part that is present slips away before it becomes known to our senses? Such too is the nature of things that come to be: it is either growing or decreasing, and its stability and foundation have nothing certain. The bodies of animals and plants, then, were alike, as though bound by the force of a torrent to an inborn necessity, and subject to that motion which brings them to birth and death, and contained by the nature of time, which possesses a property akin to changeable things. From this point, accordingly, the narrator began, teaching us plainly about the construction of the world, that in the beginning God made it. Now a "beginning" is what belongs to time, not what looks to that antiquity which is prior to all things. So he did not say "In the beginning God made" with respect to that, but after those invisible and intelligible things he narrates the beginning of the origin of the things that are seen and grasped by the senses. A beginning is also called the first motion, as "The beginning of a right road is to do just things" (Prov 16:5 LXX). For by just works we are moved to live blessedly. A beginning is also called that from which a thing is made out of some underlying material, as the foundation in houses, the keel in ships, and as it is said, "The beginning of wisdom is the fear of the Lord" (Prov 1:7). For reverence with fear is always set first as a kind of defence and support for firmness of faith. The first part of works of construction is also called the beginning, as the wisdom of Bezalel for the adornment of the tabernacle. And often the good outcome of what is begun becomes the beginning of actions: as in generous mercy the favour of God follows, and in the practice of virtues that end is held which lies in the promises.
Col 1:16 (quotation, high confidence) · Prov 1:7 (quotation, high confidence) · Exod 31:2–5 (allusion, medium confidence) · Gen 1:1 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Before the visible world God made an invisible order of spiritual beings; time began with this world, and 'beginning' has several senses.
- The saying 'The beginning of a good road is to do just things' is a Greek addition found in the LXX of Proverbs (at 16:7 in Rahlfs; Migne cites 16:5); it has no counterpart in the Hebrew text. 'Virtues', 'armies of angels' and 'assemblies of archangels' extend the quotation of Col 1:16. Bezalel's wisdom: Exod 31:2–5. The sentence 'The bodies of animals and plants, then, were alike' (Paria fuerunt ergo) is obscure in the Latin and translated by sense.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR): mtmdum → mundum; virtotibus → virtutibus; aotequam → antequam; nibil babet → nihil habet; nou seeundum → non secundum; juslis → justis.
Cite (SBL): Eustathius, Hex. 1.5 (PL 53:872a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/eustathius-hexaemeron-metaphrasis/1-5). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/eustathius-hexaemeron-metaphrasis/1-5
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-eustathius-hexaemeron-metaphrasis-1-5) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of the staged edition (digital text; corrections logged). No public-domain English translation exists and no FOTC volume covers this work, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
1.6PL 53:873b
Toties igitur nominato principio, considera si non præsens vox omnibus significatis accommoda est. Etenim ex eo tempore quo mundi coepit institutio, possibile tibi est dicere, si de præsentibus ad præterita repedando, principalem diem mundanæ creationis inquiras: unde tempori motus primus accesserit. Deinde quia velut sedes et repagula quædam, cœlum terraque fundata sunt; et quia est artifex Verbum, quod decorationem omnium quæ videntur effecit, sicut vox relati monstrat initii: et quia non sine ratione, vel frustra formatus est mundus. Quippe qui utilem necessariumque rebus esset exitum præbiturus, si revera animorum rationabilium, sicut diximus, magisterium, et divinæ notionis eruditionem, per visibilia hæc et sensibilia tribuit menti nostræ regens nos, ut ita dixerim, manu, quo facilius invi- sihilia contemplemur, sicut dicit Apostolus: Quia invisibilia ejus, a mundi compositione per ea quæ facta sunt, intellecta conspiciuntur (Rom. i, 20). Fortassis autem propter celeritatem creaturæ. quæ sine ullo momento temporis cst constructa, dictum est: In principio fecit; quoniam individua quædam res est, et indistincta, principium. Sicut enim initium viæ necdum via est, et initium domus, necdum domus est: sic et temporis initium, necdum plenum tempus est; sed nec exigua pars temporis. Quod si repugnans forte quispiam principium dixerit esse tempus, sciat hoc esse divisurum in multiplices portiones, id est in primam, mediam et extremam. Principium autem principii quærere ridiculum penitus et ineptum est. Et qui dividit principium, duas necessario faciet pro una partes, vel potius, plures; quoniam semper illud quo i divisum fucrit, in duas sine dubio scinditur portio- nes. Ergo ut doceremur simul cum Dei voluntate mundum sine tempore substitisse, dixit: In principio fecit. Quam rem certi interpretes planius exponentes, dixerunt: Summatim fecit Deus, id est brevi subitoque. Igitur super principio pauca de multis hactenus disseruisse sufficiat.
Since "beginning" has so many meanings, consider whether the present word does not suit them all. For you can speak of the time from which the establishment of the world began, if, going back from the present to the past, you look for the first day of the world's creation, the point from which time received its first motion. Then, that heaven and earth were founded first as a kind of seat and set of bars; and that there is a craftsman, the Word, who made the adornment of all that is seen, as the word "beginning" here used shows; and that the world was not formed without reason or in vain. For it was to provide a useful and necessary outcome for things, if indeed it gives our mind, as we said, the schooling of rational souls and instruction in the knowledge of God through these visible and perceptible things, leading us, so to speak, by the hand, so that we may more easily contemplate the invisible, as the Apostle says: "For his invisible things, from the creation of the world, are clearly seen, being understood through the things that are made" (Rom 1:20). Perhaps also, because of the speed of creation, which was built without any moment of time, it was said "In the beginning he made," since a beginning is something indivisible and without parts. For as the beginning of a road is not yet a road, and the beginning of a house is not yet a house, so also the beginning of time is not yet full time, nor even a small part of time. And if someone objects and says that the beginning is time, let him know that he will divide it into many portions, that is, into a first, a middle, and a last. But to seek the beginning of a beginning is utterly ridiculous and absurd. And whoever divides the beginning will necessarily make two parts instead of one, or rather many, since whatever is divided is undoubtedly cut into two portions. So, that we might be taught that the world came into existence without time, together with the will of God, he said, "In the beginning he made." Certain interpreters, explaining this more plainly, have said: "God made summarily," that is, briefly and suddenly. Let it suffice to have said thus far these few things out of many about the "beginning."
Rom 1:20 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 1:1 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: 'Beginning' fits all its senses: the first day of time, the Word as craftsman, the world's purpose, and the instantaneous, timeless act of creation.
- 'Certain interpreters' who rendered 'God made summarily' (in summa, Greek ἐν κεφαλαίῳ) are Aquila and others, named in Basil's Greek as 'other interpreters'.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR): mundanx → mundanæ; iudistincta → indistincta; subitoquc → subitoque; priucipio → principio.
Topics: Christology
Cite (SBL): Eustathius, Hex. 1.6 (PL 53:873b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/eustathius-hexaemeron-metaphrasis/1-6). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/eustathius-hexaemeron-metaphrasis/1-6
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-eustathius-hexaemeron-metaphrasis-1-6) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of the staged edition (digital text; corrections logged). No public-domain English translation exists and no FOTC volume covers this work, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
1.7PL 53:874b
Sane sciendum quoniam artium omnium, aliæ factriccs, aliæ negotiales appellantur, aliæ contemplatoriæ, et contemplatoriarum quidem finis est sola mentis intentio, negotialium autem motus ipse corporis: qui cum desierit, nihil reliqui est, nec ultra videntibus demonstratur. Nam saltationis et cantuum nullus exitus est: sed in semetipsam operatio tota consumitur. In arlibus vero factricibus, etiamsi labor actusque cessaverit, manifestum tamen est opus ea- rum, sicut fabrilitatis, et architecturae, et texturæ et his similium, quarum licet arLifex præsto non fuerit, ratio tamen artis ipsius apparet, possumusque de opere conspecto peritiam cujusque artificis admirari. Ergo ut certum fieret quia mundus arte perfectus est, qui cunctorum visibus habetur exposituS, quatenus per eum fabricatoris sui sapientia nosceretur: non alia voce Moyses usus est, sed dixit: In principio fecit Deus. Non construxit aut composuit, sed fecit. Quamvis nonnulli eorum qui vana opinione præventi sunt, sempiternum mundum cum Deo esse dicentes, nullo modo ab ipso factum concesserunt, sed tanquam obumbrationem quamdam virtutis esse divinæ. Ferunt enim eum sponte compositum, ct quamvis Deum ejus haberi fateantur auctorem; ita tamen fatentur, ut sine voluntate ipsius processisse confirment, sicut ex corpore umbram, vel ex luce fulgorem. Volens itaque hujusmodi errorem propheta corrigere, hac verborum subtilitate potius usus est dicens: In principio fecit Deus, id est non causam præstitit ut esset solum, sed fecit ut bonus utilem, ut sapiens optimum, ut potens maximum. Cum enim dicit: Quia fecit, quemdam sine dubio declarat artiflcem, qui singulorum compositione membrorum, per omnia convenientem sibimet et congruum formavit mundum. In principio fecit Deus cœlum et terram. Ex duobus igitur summatibus elementis, omnium substantiam designat a exstructam: cælo quidem privilegia digniora contribuens, terram vero in secundo creaturarum loco constituens; et si quid aliud est medium, cum principalibus istis una perfectum est. Ita quamvis nihil de aere, vel igne, vel aqua di- ctum sit: te tamen prudentia propria necesse est intelligere. Primo quidem, quia omnia in omnibus sunt permixta. Siquidem aquam, et aerem, et ignem terrae cohærere certissimum est: nam et ex ferro et ex lapidibus ignis per fricationem solet excuti: quæ utique de tellure nascuntur. Et est mirum quomodo dum in memoratis abstrusa est flamma, corporibus habetur innoxia, cum vero fuerit extrinsecus elicita, devorat eam materiam in qua fuerat custodita. Aquarum quoque naturam venis subesse terrarum fossores indicant puteorum: quibus etiam aerem esse permixtum ex eo cognoscere possumus, quod cum fuerit humectata tellus, et temperiem solis acceperit, mox vapores exhalat largissimos. Deinde si naturaliter sedem superiorem coelum sortitum est, terra vero habetur inferior; ob hoc quia quae leviora sunt feruntur ad coelum, quae autem gravia sunt devehuntur ad terram. Contraria autem sibi sunt inferna et superna. Quid dicendum est, nisi quia ille qui res disjunctissimas præcepti societate conjunxit, etiam ea quæ medius utriusque elementi locus amplectitur, suo dispensavit arbitrio? Non ergo quæras de singulis rationem, sed illa quoque quæ silentio Scriplura præteriit, ex his quæ relata sunt debebis advertere.
We should know that of all arts some are called productive, some practical, and some contemplative. The end of the contemplative is only the attention of the mind; that of the practical is the movement of the body itself, and when it stops, nothing remains and nothing more is shown to those who watch. For dancing and singing leave no product: the whole activity is spent upon itself. But in the productive arts, even if the labour and activity have stopped, their work is still evident, as in carpentry, architecture, weaving, and the like: even if the craftsman is not present, the skill of the art itself is apparent, and from the work that is seen we can admire the expertise of each craftsman. So, that it might be certain that the world, which lies open to everyone's sight, was completed by art, so that through it the wisdom of its maker might be known, Moses used no other word, but said: "In the beginning God made." He did not say "built" or "put together," but "made." Yet some of those who are prejudiced by a vain opinion, saying that the world is everlasting with God, in no way granted that it was made by him, but said it is a kind of shadow of the divine power. For they say that it came together spontaneously; and although they admit that God is its author, they admit it in such a way as to affirm that it proceeded from him without his will, like a shadow from a body or brightness from light. Wishing to correct such an error, the prophet chose this precision of words, saying, "In the beginning God made": that is, he did not merely provide the cause of its being, but made it, as one who is good makes something useful, as one who is wise makes what is best, as one who is mighty makes what is greatest. For when he says "made," he undoubtedly declares a craftsman who, by the composition of individual members, formed a world fitting and harmonious with itself in every part. "In the beginning God made heaven and earth." By the two chief elements, then, he indicates that the substance of all things was built: assigning the worthier privileges to heaven, and setting the earth in the second place among creatures; and whatever else lies between was completed together with these principal ones. So, although nothing has been said of air, fire, or water, you must understand them by your own good sense. First, because all things are mixed in all. It is quite certain that water, air, and fire are joined to the earth: for fire is often struck out by friction from iron and stones, which certainly come from the earth. And it is wonderful how, while the flame is hidden in these bodies, it is harmless to them, but when it is drawn out, it devours the matter in which it was kept. Diggers of wells show that the nature of water lies beneath in the veins of the earth; and that air is mixed with it we can know from this, that when the earth is moistened and receives the warmth of the sun, it soon breathes out abundant vapours. Then, if heaven by nature received the higher seat and the earth is lower, because light things are carried toward heaven and heavy things are carried down toward the earth, and lower and upper are contrary to each other, what must we say except that he who joined the most separated things by the fellowship of his command also arranged by his own will the things that the middle place between the two elements contains? Do not, then, ask for an account of each thing, but you must perceive from what has been related even the things the Scripture passed over in silence.
Gen 1:1 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: 'Made' shows the world is the work of a craftsman acting by will, not an involuntary emanation; heaven and earth imply the elements between them.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR): factricibns → factricibus; nosceretufr → nosceretur; ab ipso iactum → ab ipso factum; conslitueus → constituens; ferimtur → feruntur.
Cite (SBL): Eustathius, Hex. 1.7 (PL 53:874b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/eustathius-hexaemeron-metaphrasis/1-7). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/eustathius-hexaemeron-metaphrasis/1-7
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-eustathius-hexaemeron-metaphrasis-1-7) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of the staged edition (digital text; corrections logged). No public-domain English translation exists and no FOTC volume covers this work, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
1.8PL 53:875c
In principio fecit Deus cœlum et terram. Igitur terrena substantia, et inquisitio singulorum quae nosiris sensibus exposita sunt, tam longum nobis faciunt narrationis affatum, ut multo plures sermones in hujusmodi examinatione disserendi sint, quam in cæ- teris omnibus quæ explicari possibile est. De qua re nulla penitus commoditas aedificandae confertur Ecclesiæ, sed super cœli quidem natura contenti simus his quæ retulit Isaias, qui verbis usus simplicibus sufficientem nobis 4e eo perhibuit intellectum dicens: Qui firmavit cælum sicut fumum (Isai. LI, 6), id est qui minime fortem crassamque naturam in cœli compositione substituit. De schemate etiam ejus satis ab eo dictum est, cum glorificatione Dei. Quis stabilivit coelum, ut cameram (Isai. XL, 22)? Eadem etiam de terra sentiri suademus: minime videlicet discutientes qualis sit ejus substantia, nec conficere e nosco- gitationibus perscrutantes quid ei subjaceat, nec scrutari naturam qualitatibus vacuam et informem, sed tantum scire nos convenit, quia omnia quæ erga terram videmus, ad hoc solum ut essent ordinata sunt, quibus rebus substantia compleretur. Itaquead nullum pervenies terminum, si singulas ejus qualitates persequi sermone tentaveris. Si enim discreveris ejus nigrorem, i frigiditatem, gravitudinem, densitatem, et eas qualitates quæ sapore gustus comprehen- sibiles habentur, nihil erit penitus quod telluri subjaceat. Hæc igitur emittentes, nec illud hortamur inquiri, super quid sit terra firmata. Torquebitur enim mens ad nullum certum exitum perveniente discursionis indagine. Sive enim aerem dixeris ejus subesse fundamini: profecto deficies cogitando, quemadmodum liquida et diffusa natura, tanto pondere depressa subsistit ac non potius iabitur: undique terræ diffugiens densitatem, ac semper eminentior cum premente consistens. Quod si aquam posueris terre- Me stabilitati esse subditam, nihilominus percunctari necesse est, quomodo moles tam gravis et spissa, minime sub aqua demergitur, sed ab infirmiore natura, superjectio tanti ponderis sustentatur. Si quidem ipsius etiam aquae fundamenta quaerenda sunt, et iterum deficiendum est cum invenire volueris quo fulcimine resisten te fundus ultimus continetur.
"In the beginning God made heaven and earth." The substance of the earth, then, and the investigation of each of the things that lie open to our senses, would make our account so long that far more words would have to be spent on such an examination than on all the other things that can be explained. From this no benefit at all is brought to the building up of the church. Concerning the nature of heaven, let us be content with what Isaiah said, who in simple words gave us a sufficient understanding of it, saying: "Who made the heaven firm like smoke" (Isa 51:6), that is, who set a nature that is not at all strong and dense in the composition of heaven. Of its shape too he said enough, in glorifying God: "Who established the heaven like a vault?" (Isa 40:22). We urge that the same view be taken about the earth: not discussing what kind its substance is, nor wearing ourselves out with reasonings by searching what lies beneath it, nor examining a nature empty of qualities and formless; but it suits us to know only that all the things we see about the earth were arranged for this alone, that they might be, things by which its substance is completed. So you will reach no end if you try to pursue each of its qualities in words. For if you separate off its blackness, coldness, heaviness, density, and the qualities perceptible by taste, there will be nothing at all left as the underlying earth. Leaving these aside, then, we do not urge inquiry into this either: on what the earth is founded. For the mind will be tormented, since the search of its reasoning reaches no sure outcome. If you say that air lies beneath its foundation, you will certainly fail when you consider how a fluid and diffuse nature, pressed down by so great a weight, remains in place and does not rather slip away, escaping on every side from the density of the earth and always rising above what presses on it. And if you suppose that water lies beneath the stability of the earth, you must still ask how so heavy and dense a mass is not sunk beneath the water, but the imposition of so great a weight is supported by a weaker nature. Then the foundations of the water itself must be sought, and again you will fail when you want to find on what support the lowest bottom is held, so that it resists.
Gen 1:1 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 51:6 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 40:22 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Scripture's simple words about heaven and earth suffice; inquiring into the earth's substance or what holds it up leads to endless questions.
- Isa 51:6 in the LXX reads 'the heaven was made firm like smoke'; Isa 40:22 'who set up the heaven like a vault'. Migne's references are kept.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR): gloriflcalione → glorificatione; discorsionis → discursionis; cogitaodo → cogitando; ab iufirmiore → ab infirmiore.
Cite (SBL): Eustathius, Hex. 1.8 (PL 53:875c; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/eustathius-hexaemeron-metaphrasis/1-8). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/eustathius-hexaemeron-metaphrasis/1-8
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-eustathius-hexaemeron-metaphrasis-1-8) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of the staged edition (digital text; corrections logged). No public-domain English translation exists and no FOTC volume covers this work, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
1.9PL 53:876c
Sin autem aliud quoddam validius esse corpus induxeris, quod terram prohibeat ad ima descendere: cogitare debebis illud quoque ipsum simili fundatum repagulo, quod non sinat inferius decidere quae portantur. Huic quoque ipsi, si quid confingentes potuerimus opponere, denuo aliud subesse munimen: necessario discursura est mens, et ita in infinitum cogitatione ducemur, semper his quae inveniuntur firmamentis, alia nova quærentes. Et quanto longius sermone progredimur, tanto magis virtutem sustentatricem terrae superducere compellemur: quæ simul omnia quæ superjecta sinit valeat sustentare. Propterea disquisitioni metas debebis impo- nere: ne quandoque curiositati tuæ, nimis incomprehensibilia pertractanti, verbum Job videatur obsistere, et interrogeris super quid circuli ejus infixi sunt (Job XXXVIII, 6). Sed et si unquam in psalmo audieris: Ego confirmavi columnas ejus (Psal. LXXIV,4), compositoriam profecto virtutem ejus, columnas intellige. Quod autem dictum est: Ipse super maria fundavit eam (Psal. XXIII. 2), quid aliud scilicet significat, quam quia undique orbem terre, aquarum natura circumfusa complectitur? Quomodo ergo cum ait aqua fluida, semperque ad decliviora contendere soleat, pendula est, et in neutram diffunditur partem? Illud quoque non reputas, quia non minorem, sed etiam majorem difficultatem nobis ipsa tellus importat, cum tanto sui pondere librata teneatur in aere. Sed necesse est, sive super se ipsam locatam esse concesseris, sive super aquas eam ferri dixerimus: nusquam nos a pietatis cogitatione discedere conveniet, sed contineri virtute creatoris omnia fateamur. Haec itaque nos oportet, et nobis ipsis suadere, et sciscitantibus ubi sit ampla, et insustenta- hilis terræ gravitudo firmata, respondere, dicentes: Quia terræ fines in manu sunt Dei (Psal. XCIV, 4). Hoc nihilominus, vel nobis ad credendum commodius, vel auscultantibus utilius poterit inveniri.
But if you bring in some other, stronger body to keep the earth from sinking to the depths, you will have to consider that this too is founded on a similar barrier that does not let what it carries fall lower. And if we could invent something to put beneath this as well, the mind will necessarily run on to another support beneath it, and so we shall be led on in thought to infinity, always seeking new supports for the ones we find. And the further we go in argument, the more we shall be compelled to bring in a power that sustains the earth, able to support at once all the things it allows to be placed upon it. So you must set limits to your inquiry, lest at some point, as your curiosity handles things too incomprehensible, the word of Job should seem to stand against you, and you be asked, "On what were its circles fixed?" (Job 38:6). And if you ever hear in the psalm, "I have made firm its pillars" (Ps 75:3), understand the pillars to be its holding-together power. And what does "He founded it upon the seas" (Ps 24:2) mean, except that the nature of the waters surrounds and embraces the circle of the earth on every side? How, then, since water is fluid and always tends to run to lower places, does it hang there and not flow away on either side? Nor do you consider that the earth itself brings us not less but even greater difficulty, since with so great a weight it is held balanced in the air. But whether you grant that it is placed upon itself or we say that it is carried upon the waters, it is fitting that we never depart from the thought of piety, but confess that all things are held together by the power of the Creator. We should therefore persuade ourselves of this, and answer those who ask where the vast and insupportable weight of the earth is fixed by saying: "The ends of the earth are in the hand of God" (Ps 95:4). This can be found either more convenient for us to believe or more profitable for those who listen.
Job 38:6 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 75:3 (74:4 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 24:2 (23:2 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 95:4 (94:4 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Every proposed support of the earth needs another; the pious answer is that all is held together by the Creator's power, the ends of the earth being in his hand.
- Job 38:6 LXX ('on what are its rings fixed?'); Ps 75:3 (LXX 74:4); Ps 24:2 (LXX 23:2); Ps 95:4 (LXX 94:4). Migne's references use the Latin psalm numbering.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR): debehis → debebis; dinicultatem → difficultatem.
Cite (SBL): Eustathius, Hex. 1.9 (PL 53:876c; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/eustathius-hexaemeron-metaphrasis/1-9). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/eustathius-hexaemeron-metaphrasis/1-9
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-eustathius-hexaemeron-metaphrasis-1-9) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of the staged edition (digital text; corrections logged). No public-domain English translation exists and no FOTC volume covers this work, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
1.10PL 53:877b
Licet quidam de physicis philosophis a tali quadam dispositione commententur terram immobilem permanere. Ferunt enim quod in mundo sita sit, et paribus undique collecta spatiis, ad summitatem usque non habere, quo magis valeat inclinari, et ob hoc semper in semetipsa consistit, impossibileque esse, ut eam patiatur æqualitas circumdata, ullum invenire momentum, in alium flectendi se locum. Mediam autem regionem, non fortuito vel sponte: nec aliqua sorte quaesitam tenere tellurem: sed naturaliter necessarieque situi ejus esse decretam. Coc- lesti enim corpore, ulteriorem in superioribus nacto sedem; quaecunque, inquiunt, arbitramur pondera de locis summioribus ad ima descendere, in medium congregantur locum; et in eas stationes totum deduci necesse est corpus in quas singulæ partes coierint. Quod si lapides et ligna, cunctaque terrena, semper ad inferiora pelluntur: ibi erit sine dubio propria conveniensque terræ positio. Si vero aliquid de levioribus ex media regione movebitur, id ad superna ferri certissimum est: quoniam familiare est rebus gravissimis ima semper appetere. Ima autem dicimus, medium totius mundi locum. Non ergo mireris, si nusquam se tellus inclinat, ut pote mediam omnium sortita sedem, in qua eam necesse est semper stare, nullatenusque contra naturam, de propriis limbus submoveri. Horum igitur si quid tibi probabile videatur, ad sapientiam creatoris, qui hæc ita disposuit, oportet te hujusmodi transferre miracula. Neque enim minuetur rerum dignitas maximarum, si quæ sit earum ratio detegamus, aut si secus evenerit, simplicitatem fidei potiorem cæteris fieri suadeo documentis.
Yet some of the natural philosophers argue that the earth remains unmoved because of a certain arrangement. They say that it is set in the middle of the world and, being gathered at equal distances on every side up to the outer limit, has no direction in which it can incline more, and for this reason it always rests in itself; and that the equality surrounding it makes it impossible for it to find any impulse to turn itself to another place. The earth, they say, holds the middle region not by chance or spontaneously or by some lot, but this position was decreed for it by nature and necessity. For since the heavenly body has obtained the farthest seat above, whatever weights, they say, we think descend from higher places to the depths are gathered into the middle place; and the whole body must be drawn into the positions in which its several parts come together. If stones and timbers and all earthly things are always driven downward, there will undoubtedly be the proper and fitting position of the earth. But if anything lighter is moved out of the middle region, it is quite certain that it is carried upward, since it is natural for the heaviest things always to seek the depths; and by "depths" we mean the middle place of the whole world. So do not wonder if the earth nowhere inclines, since it has received the middle seat of all, in which it must always stand and in no way be moved, against nature, from its own limits. If any of these things seems probable to you, you should transfer your wonder at such things to the wisdom of the Creator, who arranged them so. For the dignity of the greatest things is not lessened if we discover what their reason is; and if it turns out otherwise, I urge that the simplicity of faith be made stronger than all other proofs.
Notes and citation
Summary: Some philosophers explain that the earth stays still because it lies at the centre where heavy things gather; if so, the wonder belongs to the Creator, and faith outweighs proofs.
- The view is that of Aristotle (De caelo 2.13–14) and Plato (Phaedo 108e–109a), not named here.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR): mianetur → minuetur; cxleris → cæteris.
Cite (SBL): Eustathius, Hex. 1.10 (PL 53:877b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/eustathius-hexaemeron-metaphrasis/1-10). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/eustathius-hexaemeron-metaphrasis/1-10
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-eustathius-hexaemeron-metaphrasis-1-10) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of the staged edition (digital text; corrections logged). No public-domain English translation exists and no FOTC volume covers this work, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
1.11PL 53:878a
De cœlo quoque si eadem dixeris non pec. cabis, licet philosophorum multiloquax disputatio a plurimum super coeli natura disseruerit. Quo rum alii compositum ex quatuor asserunt elementis, ipsumque esse invisibilem, partemque habere lelluris, propter insitam sibi duritiem, habere etiam ignis societatem, ex quo quasi perspicuum putatur esse, nihilominus etiam reliquarum portionum permixtiones amplectitur. Nonnulli autem, hujusmodi opinione contempta, quintam quamdam naturam, in cæli compositione proprio commenti arbitrio, subjunxerunt: quibus videtur corpus æthereum, non aer esse, non terra, non aqua, non ignis nec aliud penitus guod simplex esse credatur, ob hoc videlicet, quod simplicibus familiare est, motum semper habere directum, quorum leviora sursum semper intendunt, graviora vero deorsum labuntur. Sed nec superior aut inferior pars telluris, e vertibili motu, idem omnino vel directum erga circuli rotunditatem continet intervallum. Quorum autem naturales motus mutari solent, eorum etiam qualitates ipsas mutabiles esse necesse est. Licet nec de illis principalibus corporibus, quæ vocantur elementa, possibile nobis est credere coelum fuisse compositum: quoniam ea quae ex diversa materia construuntur, minime sibi conveniunt, nec possunt sine vi aliqua motum tenere concordem, ut pote singulis partibus, alium atque alium impetum habentibus ex natura, nimioque labore quæ composita sunt, in motu continentur assiduo. Neque enim potest una atque eadem ratio, i rebus inter se dissimilibus ac repugnantibus consonare: cum ea quæ levioribus sunt amica, gravioribus contraria judicentur. Nam cum ad superna et coelestia properamus, pondere terreno deprimimur. Cum autem ad ima demergimur, vim facimus igni, contra naturam suam eum pertrahentes inferius. Elementorum autem distractio in partes ducta diversas ruinæ causas et solutionis importat. Quod enim violenter natura recusante tentatur, celeriter dissipatur: ut pote singulis partibus per quas moles constructa subsistit, ad suum principium redeunti- bus. Propter harum igitur opinionum necessitates, secta priorum philosophorum, hi qui postea successere rescissa, proprias assertiones subjicere sestinarunt: quintam quamdam naturam corporis, ut diximus, in coeli siderumque substantiam subesse firmantes. Alius autem quidam de acrioribus, hæc quidem quae narravimus cuncta destruxit, proprium vero dogma visus est commendare. De quibus si referre singula maluerimus, similem illis patiemur errorem. Sed eos a semetipsis vicissim dejici relinquamus, et omni illorum contentione postposita, sequamur Moysen dicentem: ln principio fecit Deus cœlum et terram, Conditoremque optimum rerum sapientissime formatarum glorificemus, et ex visibilium pulchritudine, illum qui nimis optimus est contemple- mur. Et ex magnitudine corporum circumscriptorum metiamur illum infinitum, et maximum, omnemque cogitationem cordis humani suæ virtutis amplitudine transgredientem. Nam licet creaturæ naturam minime comprehendamus, tamen idipsum quod tenui- ter nostro subjicilur intellectui, tantum habet admirationis, ut etiam velocissima mens inferior videatur his rebus quæ in hoc mundo habentur exiguæ, debitamque super omnibus laudem Conditori referamus impensius: cui gloria et honor, nunc et semper, et in saecula saeculorum. Amen.
If you say the same about heaven, you will not sin, although the talkative disputation of the philosophers has said a great deal about the nature of heaven. Some of them assert that it is composed of the four elements, and that it is invisible, and has a share of earth because of its inborn hardness, and also a share of fire, which is why it is thought to be transparent, and that it nonetheless includes mixtures of the remaining portions. But others, despising such an opinion, added by their own invention a certain fifth nature in the composition of heaven: to them the ethereal body seems to be neither air, nor earth, nor water, nor fire, nor anything at all believed to be simple; for this reason, that it is natural to simple bodies always to have a straight motion, the lighter of them always tending upward and the heavier slipping downward; but in circular motion neither the upper nor the lower part keeps the same or a straight interval relative to the round of the circle. And things whose natural motions change must also have changeable qualities. Nor can we believe that heaven was composed of those principal bodies called elements, since things built of different matter do not agree with one another, nor can they keep a harmonious motion without some force, since each part has by nature a different impulse, and things so composed are kept in continuous motion only with great effort. For one and the same principle cannot harmonize things that are unlike and opposed to one another, since what is friendly to lighter things is judged contrary to heavier ones. For when we hasten to the heights and heavenly places, we are pressed down by earthly weight; and when we plunge to the depths, we do violence to fire, dragging it downward against its nature. And the pulling of elements in different directions brings causes of ruin and dissolution. For what is attempted by force against nature's refusal is quickly scattered, as each part from which the mass was built returns to its own principle. Because of the difficulties of these opinions, those who came after rejected the school of the earlier philosophers and hastened to put forward their own assertions, affirming, as we said, that a certain fifth nature of body underlies the substance of heaven and the stars. And yet another, one of the sharper ones, destroyed all that we have narrated and appeared to commend his own doctrine. If we chose to report each of these, we would suffer an error like theirs. Let us rather leave them to be overthrown by one another in turn, and, putting aside all their contention, let us follow Moses when he says, "In the beginning God made heaven and earth." Let us glorify the best Creator of things most wisely formed, and from the beauty of visible things let us contemplate him who is supremely good. From the greatness of bounded bodies let us measure him who is infinite and greatest, and who surpasses every thought of the human heart by the vastness of his power. For although we do not comprehend the nature of creation, yet that very part of it which slightly falls under our understanding holds so much wonder that even the swiftest mind seems inferior to the smallest things in this world; and let us render more fervently the praise due above all to the Creator, to whom be glory and honour, now and always, and for ages of ages. Amen.
Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.
Gen 1:1 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The philosophers refute one another about the substance of heaven; Christians follow Moses and praise the infinite Creator from the beauty of what he made.
- The 'fifth nature' (quintessence, aether) is Aristotle's. The sentence on circular motion is corrupt or compressed in the Latin and is translated by sense.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR): disserucrit → disseruerit; simplicibns → simplicibus; magnitudiuc → magnitudine; nuuc et semper → nunc et semper.
Cite (SBL): Eustathius, Hex. 1.11 (PL 53:878a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/eustathius-hexaemeron-metaphrasis/1-11). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/eustathius-hexaemeron-metaphrasis/1-11
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-eustathius-hexaemeron-metaphrasis-1-11) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of the staged edition (digital text; corrections logged). No public-domain English translation exists and no FOTC volume covers this work, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.