City of God 20.14–20.19
Latin text: Hoffmann, CSEL 40 (Latin text: Dombart and Hoffmann, De civitate dei (CSEL 40, 1899-1900), digitized by Open Greek and Latin (csel-dev, University of Leipzig), CC BY-SA 4.0).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0). Compare: Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, series 1, vol. 2 (1887).
Chapter 20
20.14CSEL 40:460–463
CAPUT XIIII. De damnatione diaboli cum suis et per recapitulationem de resurrectione corporea omnium mortuorum et de iudicio ultimae retributionis. Post hanc autem commemorationem nouissimae persecutionis breuiter conplectitur totum, quod ultimo iam iudicio diabolus et cum suo principe ciuitas inimica passura est. Dicit enim: Et diabolus, qui seducebat eos, missus est in stagnum ignis et sulphuris, quo et bestia et pseudopropheta; et cruciabuntur die ac nocte in saecula saeculorum. Bestiam bene intellegi ipsam inpiam ciuitatem supra diximus. Pseudopropheta uero eius aut Antichristus est aut imago illa, id est figmentum, de quo ibi locuti sumus. Post haec ipsum nouissimum iudicium, quod erit in secunda resurrectione mortuorum, quae corporum est, recapitulando narrans quo modo sibi fuerit reuelatum: Et uidi. inquit, thronum magnum et candidum et sedentem super eum, cuius a facie fugit caelum et terra, et locus eorum inuentus non est. Non ait: Vidi thronum magnum et candidum et sedentem super eum, et ab eius facie fugit caelum et terra, quoniam non tunc factum est, id est, antequam esset de uiuis et mortuis iudicatum; sed eum se uidisse dixit in throno sedentem, a cuius facie fugit caelum et terra, sed postea. Peracto quippe iudicio, tunc esse desinet hoc caelum et haec terra, quando incipiet esse caelum nouum et terra noua. Mutatione namque rerum, non omni modo interitu transibit hic mundus. Unde et apostolus dicit: Praeterit enim figura huius mundi, uolo uos sine sollicitudine esse. Figura ergo praeterit, non natura. Cum ergo se Iohannes uidisse dixisset sedentem super thronum, cuius a facie, quod postea futurum est, fugit caelum et terra: Et uidi, inquit, mortuos magnos et pusillos, et aperti sunt libri; et alius liber apertus est, qui est uitae uniuscuiusque; et iudicati sunt mortui ex ipsis scripturis librorum secundum facta sua. Libros dixit esse apertos et librum; sed librum cuius modi non tacuit: Qui est, inquit, uitae uniuscuiusque. Ergo illi libri, quos priore loco posuit, intellegendi sunt sancti, et ueteres et noui, ut in illis ostenderetur, quae Deus fieri sua mandata iussisset; in illo autem, qui est uitae uniuscuiusque, quid horum quisque non fecisset siue fecisset. Qui liber si carnaliter cogitetur, quis eius magnitudinem aut longitudinem ualeat aestimare? Aut quanto tempore legi poterit liber, in quo scriptae sunt uniuersae uitae uniuersorum? An tantus angelorum numerus aderit, quantus hominum erit, et uitam suam quisque ab angelo sibi adhibito audiet recitari? Non ergo unus liber erit omnium, sed singuli singulorum. Scriptura uero ista unum uolens intellegi: Et alius, inquit, liber apertus est. Quaedam igitur uis est intellegenda diuina, qua fiet, ut cuique opera sua, uel bona uel mala, cuncta in memoriam reuocentur et mentis intuitu mira celeritate cernantur, ut accuset uel excuset scientia conscientiam adque ita simul et omnes et singuli iudicentur. Quae nimirum uis diuina libri nomen accepit. In ea quippe quodam modo legitur, quidquid ea faciente recolitur. Ut autem ostendat, qui mortui iudicandi sint, pusilli et magni, recapitulando dicit tamquam ad id rediens, quod praeterierat potiusue distulerat: Et exhibuit mortuos mare, qui in eo erant, et mors et infernus reddiderunt mortuos, quos in se habebant. Hoc procul dubio prius factum est, quam essent mortui iudicati; et tamen illud prius dictum est. Hoc est ergo quod dixi, recapitulando eum ad id redisse quod intermiserat. Nunc autem ordinem tenuit, adque ut explicaretur ipse ordo, commodius etiam de iudicatis mortuis, quod iam dixerat, suo repetiuit loco. Cum enim dixisset: Et exhibuit mortuos mare, qui in eo erant, et mors et infernus reddiderunt mortuos, quos in se habebant: mox addidit quod paulo ante posuerat: Et iudicati sunt singuli secundum facta sua. Hoc est enim quod supra dixerat: Et iudicati sunt mortui secundum facta sua.
Chapter 14. On the condemnation of the devil with his followers, and, by way of recapitulation, on the bodily resurrection of all the dead and the judgment of final retribution.
After this mention of the last persecution, he briefly sums up all that the devil, and the enemy city with its prince, will suffer at the last judgment. For he says: “And the devil who deceived them was thrown into the lake of fire and sulfur, where the beast and the false prophet also are; and they will be tormented day and night for ever and ever.” We said above that the beast is well understood as the ungodly city itself. Its false prophet is either Antichrist or that image, that is, the pretense, of which we spoke there. After this, recapitulating, he describes the last judgment itself, which will be at the second resurrection of the dead, the resurrection of bodies, as it was revealed to him: “And I saw,” he says, “a great white throne and one seated on it, from whose face heaven and earth fled away, and no place was found for them.” He does not say, “I saw a great white throne and one seated on it, and heaven and earth fled from his face,” because it did not happen then, that is, before judgment had been given on the living and the dead; but he said that he saw him sitting on the throne from whose face heaven and earth fled, but afterwards. For when the judgment has been completed, then this heaven and this earth will cease to be, when a new heaven and a new earth begin to be. For this world will pass away by a change of things, not by utter destruction. Hence the apostle too says: “For the form of this world is passing away; I want you to be free from anxiety.” It is the form, then, that passes away, not the nature.
When, then, John had said that he saw one seated on the throne, from whose face (which is to happen afterwards) heaven and earth fled, he says: “And I saw the dead, great and small, and books were opened; and another book was opened, which is the book of the life of each one; and the dead were judged by what was written in the books, according to their deeds.” He said that books were opened, and a book; but he did not leave unsaid what sort of book: “which is,” he says, “of the life of each one.” So those books which he put first are to be understood as the holy books, both old and new, so that in them it might be shown what commandments God had ordered to be done; and in that one which is of the life of each one, which of these each person had not done or had done. If this book is conceived of carnally, who could estimate its size or length? Or how long would it take to read a book in which are written all the lives of all people? Or will as great a number of angels be present as there will be of human beings, and will each hear his own life recited by an angel assigned to him? Then it will not be one book for all, but one for each. But this Scripture wishes one to be understood: “And another book,” it says, “was opened.” We must therefore understand a certain divine power, by which it will come about that each person's works, good or evil, are all recalled to memory and seen by the mind's gaze with marvelous swiftness, so that knowledge accuses or excuses conscience, and so all and each are judged at once. It is this divine power, surely, that has received the name of a book. For in it, in a way, is read whatever is recalled by its action.
Then, to show which dead are to be judged, small and great, he says by recapitulation, as though returning to what he had passed over or rather put off: “And the sea gave up the dead who were in it, and death and hell gave back the dead whom they had in them.” This undoubtedly took place before the dead were judged; and yet that was said first. This, then, is what I meant: that by recapitulation he returned to what he had left out. But now he kept to the order, and, to set out that order, he fittingly repeated in its own place what he had already said about the judging of the dead. For when he had said, “And the sea gave up the dead who were in it, and death and hell gave back the dead whom they had in them,” he at once added what he had put a little before: “And they were judged, each one according to his deeds.” For this is what he had said above: “And the dead were judged according to their deeds.”
Rev 20:10–13 (quotation, high confidence) · Rev 21:1 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 7:31–32 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 2:15 (echo, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Augustine explains Revelation 20:10–13: the devil's condemnation, the passing of the world's form, the books opened at judgment, and the book of life as God's power recalling each person's deeds.
- Revelation 20:10–13; 21:1; 1 Corinthians 7:31–32; Romans 2:15 (“accuse or excuse”). “Hell” renders “infernus”. Augustine holds that the world passes by transformation, not annihilation.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR a for u; OCR n for u; stray letter; word split): lVidi → Vidi; de quo ibi locati sumus → de quo ibi locuti sumus; quid horum quisque non fecisset sine fecisset → quid horum quisque non fecisset siue fecisset; Et ex hibuit → Et exhibuit.
Topics: Eschatology
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Civ. 20.14 (CSEL 40:460–463; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-civitate-dei/20-14/#p-20-14). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-civitate-dei-20-14) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Hoffmann's Latin text (CSEL 40, 1899–1900); compared afterwards with the NPNF¹ 2 translation (Dods, 1887).
20.15CSEL 40:463–464
CAPUT XV. Qui sint mortui, quos ad iudicium exhibuit mare, uel quos mors et inferi reddiderunt. Sed qui sunt mortui, quos exhibuit mare, qui in eo erant? Neque enim qui in mari moriuntur, non sunt in inferno, aut corpora eorum seruantur in mari, aut, quod est absurdius, mare habebat bonos mortuos et infernus malos. Quis hoc putauerit? Sed profecto conuenienter quidam hoc loco mare pro isto saeculo positum accipiunt. Cum ergo et quos hic inueniet Christus in corpore constitutos simul significaret cum eis, qui resurrecturi sunt, iudicandos, etiam ipsos mortuos appellauit, et bonos, quibus dicitur: Mortui enim estis, et uita uestra abscondita est cum Christo in Deo, et malos, de quibus dicitur: Sine mortuos sepelire mortuos suos. Possunt mortui etiam propter hoc dici, quod mortalia gerunt corpora; unde apostolus: Corpus quidem, inquit, mortuum est propter peccatum; spiritus autem uita est propter iustitiam, utrumque in homine uiuente adque in hoc corpore constituto esse demonstrans, et corpus mortuum et spiritum uitam. Nec tamen dixit corpus mortale, sed mortuum, quamuis eadem paulo post etiam mortalia corpora, sicut usitatius uocantur, appellet. Hos ergo mortuos exhibuit mare, qui in eo erant, id est, exhibuit homines hoc saeculum, quicumque in eo erant, quia nondum obierant. Et mors et infernus, inquit, reddiderunt mortuos, quos in se habebant. Mare exhibuit, quia, sicut inuenti sunt, adfuerunt; mors uero et infernus reddiderunt, quoniam uitae, de qua iam exierant, reuocarunt. Nec frustra fortasse non satis fuit ut diceret mors aut infernus, sed utrumque dictum est: mors propter bonos, qui tantummodo mortem perpeti potuerunt, non et infernum; infernus autem propter malos, qui etiam poenas aput inferos pendunt. Si enim non absurde credi uidetur antiquos etiam sanctos, qui uenturi Christi tenuerunt fidem, locis quidem a tormentis inpiorum remotissimis, sed aput inferos fuisse, donec eos inde Christi sanguis et ad ea loca descensus erueret, profecto deinceps boni fideles effuso illo pretio iam redemti prorsus inferos nesciunt, donec etiam receptis corporibus bona recipiant, quae merentur. Cum autem dixisset: Et iudicati sunt singuli secundum facta sua, breuiter subiecit, quem ad modum fuerint iudicati: Et mors et infernus, inquit, missi sunt in stagnum ignis, his nominibus significans diabolum, quoniam mortis est auctor infernarumque poenarum, uniuersamque simul daemonum societatem. Hoc est enim quod supra euidentius praeoccupando iam dixerat: Et diabolus, qui seducebat eos, missus est in stagnum ignis et sulphuris. Quod uero ibi obscurius adiunxerat dicens: Quo et bestia et pseudopropheta, hic apertius: Et qui non sunt, inquit, inuenti in libro uitae scripti, missi sunt in stagnum ignis. Non Deum liber iste commemorat, ne obliuione fallatur; sed praedestinationem significat eorum, quibus aeterna dabitur uita. Neque enim nescit eos Deus et in hoc libro legit, ut sciat; sed potius ipsa eius praescientia de illis, quae falli non potest, liber est uitae, in quo sunt scripti, id est ante praecogniti.
Chapter 15. Who the dead are whom the sea gave up to judgment, or whom death and the underworld gave back.
But who are the dead whom the sea gave up, who were in it? For it is not the case that those who die at sea are not in hell, or that their bodies are kept in the sea, or, what is more absurd, that the sea held the good dead and hell the wicked. Who would think this? But some, surely, fittingly take the sea in this place to stand for this world. Since, then, he wished to signify that those whom Christ will find here still in the body will be judged together with those who are to rise again, he called them too “dead”: both the good, to whom it is said, “For you have died, and your life is hidden with Christ in God,” and the wicked, of whom it is said, “Let the dead bury their own dead.” They can also be called dead because they bear mortal bodies; hence the apostle says: “The body is dead because of sin, but the spirit is life because of righteousness,” showing that both are in a human being who is alive and still in this body, a dead body and a living spirit. And yet he did not say “mortal” body, but “dead,” although a little later he calls the same bodies “mortal,” as they are more commonly called. These dead, then, the sea gave up, who were in it; that is, this world gave up the human beings who were in it, whoever they were, because they had not yet died. “And death and hell,” he says, “gave back the dead whom they had in them.” The sea “gave up,” because they were present just as they were found; but death and hell “gave back,” because they called them back to the life from which they had already departed. And perhaps not without reason it was not enough to say “death” or “hell,” but both were said: “death” because of the good, who could suffer only death and not hell as well; “hell” because of the wicked, who also pay penalties in the underworld. For if it seems not absurd to believe that even the ancient saints who held the faith of Christ who was to come were in the underworld, though in places far removed from the torments of the ungodly, until the blood of Christ and his descent into those places rescued them from there, then surely from that time good believers, redeemed by that price once it had been poured out, know nothing at all of the underworld, until, having received their bodies too, they receive the good things they deserve.
When he had said, “And they were judged, each one according to his deeds,” he briefly added how they were judged: “And death and hell,” he says, “were thrown into the lake of fire,” signifying by these names the devil, since he is the author of death and of the punishments of hell, and together with him the whole society of demons. For this is what he had said more plainly above, anticipating: “And the devil who deceived them was thrown into the lake of fire and sulfur.” And what he had added there more obscurely, saying, “where the beast and the false prophet also are,” he says here more openly: “And those who were not found written in the book of life were thrown into the lake of fire.” This book is not a reminder to God, lest he be misled by forgetfulness; it signifies the predestination of those to whom eternal life will be given. For it is not that God does not know them and reads in this book in order to know; rather, his very foreknowledge of them, which cannot be deceived, is the book of life in which they are written, that is, known beforehand.
Rev 20:13–15 (quotation, high confidence) · Rev 20:10 (quotation, high confidence) · Col 3:3 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 8:22 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 8:10–11 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Pet 3:19 (echo, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The sea that gives up its dead is this world, giving up those still alive at Christ's coming; death and hell give back the departed; the book of life is God's infallible foreknowledge of the predestined.
- Revelation 20:13–15, 10; Colossians 3:3; Matthew 8:22; Romans 8:10–11. “Hell” and “the underworld” render “infernus” and “inferi”. Augustine presents the view that the Old Testament saints were in a separate part of the underworld until Christ's descent as one that “seems not absurd”, not as certain.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; words run together): infemarumqute → infernarumque; etpseudopropheta → et pseudopropheta.
Topics: Eschatology
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Civ. 20.15 (CSEL 40:463–464; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-civitate-dei/20-14/#p-20-15). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-civitate-dei-20-15) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Hoffmann's Latin text (CSEL 40, 1899–1900); compared afterwards with the NPNF¹ 2 translation (Dods, 1887).
20.16CSEL 40:464–466
CAPUT XVI. De caelo nouo et terra noua. Finito autem iudicio, quo praenuntiauit iudicandos malos, restat ut etiam de bonis dicat. Iam enim explicauit quod breuiter a Domino dictum est: Sic ibunt isti in supplicium aeternum; sequitur ut explicet, quod etiam ibi conectitur: Iusti autem in uitam aeternam. Et uidi, inquit, caelum nouum et terram nouam. Nam primum caelum et terra recesserunt, et mare iam non est. Isto fiet ordine, quod superius praeoccupando iam dixit, uidisse se super thronum sedentem, cuius a facie fugit caelum et terra. Iudicatis quippe his, qui scripti non sunt in libro uitae, et in aeternum ignem missis (qui ignis cuius modi et in qua mundi uel rerum parte futurus sit, hominem scire arbitror neminem, nisi forte cui Spiritus diuinus ostendit), tunc figura huius mundi mundanorum ignium conflagratione praeteribit, sicut factum est mundanarum aquarum inundatione diluuium. Illa itaque, ut dixi, conflagratione mundana elementorum corruptibilium qualitates, quae corporibus nostris corruptibilibus congruebant, ardendo penitus interibunt. adque ipsa substantia eas qualitates habebit, quae corporibus inmortalibus mirabili mutatione conueniant; ut scilicet mundus in melius innouatus apte adcommodetur hominibus etiam carne in melius innouatis. Quod autem ait: Et mare iam non est: utrum maximo illo ardore siccetur an et ipsum uertatur in melius, non facile dixerim. Caelum quippe nouum et terram nouam futuram legimus, de mari autem nouo aliquid me uspiam legisse non recolo; nisi quod in hoc eodem libro reperitur: Tamquam mare uitreum simile crystallo. Sed tunc non de isto fine saeculi loquebatur, nec proprie dixisse uidetur mare, sed tamquam mare. Quamuis et nunc, sicut amat prophetica locutio propriis uerbis translata miscere ac sic quodam modo uelare quod dicitur, potuit de illo mari dicere: Et mare iam non est, de quo supra dixerat: Et exhibuit mortuos mare, qui in eo erant. Iam enim tunc non erit hoc saeculum uita mortalium turbulentum et procellosum, quod maris nomine figurauit.
Chapter 16. On the new heaven and the new earth.
Now that the judgment is finished in which he foretold that the wicked would be judged, it remains for him to speak of the good as well. For he has already explained what was said briefly by the Lord: “So these will go away into eternal punishment”; it follows that he should explain what is joined to it there: “But the righteous into eternal life.” “And I saw,” he says, “a new heaven and a new earth. For the first heaven and earth have passed away, and the sea is no more.” This will take place in the order he had already stated above by anticipation, when he said he saw one seated on the throne, from whose face heaven and earth fled. For when those who are not written in the book of life have been judged and sent into the eternal fire (what kind of fire this is, and in what part of the world or of things it will be, I think no one knows, unless perhaps one to whom the divine Spirit has shown it), then the form of this world will pass away by a conflagration of worldly fires, just as the flood took place by an inundation of worldly waters. By that worldly conflagration, then, as I said, the qualities of the corruptible elements, which were suited to our corruptible bodies, will utterly perish by burning, and the substance itself will have those qualities that fit immortal bodies by a wonderful change; so that, of course, the world, renewed for the better, may be fitly adapted to human beings who have also been renewed for the better in the flesh. As for his saying, “And the sea is no more,” whether it will be dried up by that great heat or be itself changed for the better, I could not easily say. For we read that there will be a new heaven and a new earth, but I do not recall having read anywhere of a new sea; except that in this same book there is found, “as it were a sea of glass like crystal.” But there he was not speaking of this end of the world, and he does not seem to have said “a sea” in the proper sense, but “as it were a sea.” Yet here too, as prophetic speech loves to mix figurative words with literal ones and so in a way to veil what is said, he may have spoken of that sea, “And the sea is no more,” of which he had said above, “And the sea gave up the dead who were in it.” For then this world, turbulent and stormy with the life of mortals, which he figured by the name of the sea, will no longer be.
Matt 25:46 (quotation, high confidence) · Rev 21:1 (quotation, high confidence) · Rev 20:11 (allusion, high confidence) · Rev 4:6 (quotation, high confidence) · Rev 20:13 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 7:31 (allusion, high confidence) · 2 Pet 3:6–7 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: After the judgment the present world will be transformed by fire into a new heaven and earth fitted to immortal bodies; the vanished sea may figure the stormy life of this world.
- Matthew 25:46; Revelation 21:1; 20:11, 13; 4:6; 1 Corinthians 7:31; 2 Peter 3:6–7, 10–13 lies behind the parallel of flood and fire. Augustine says no one knows what kind of fire the eternal fire is or where it will be.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR n for u; lost letters and leaked line number; words run together, stray letter): ibuntaisti → ibunt isti; non e 81: utrum → non est: utrum; Caelum quippe nonum et terram nonam → Caelum quippe nouum et terram nouam.
Topics: Eschatology
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Civ. 20.16 (CSEL 40:464–466; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-civitate-dei/20-14/#p-20-16). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-civitate-dei-20-16) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Hoffmann's Latin text (CSEL 40, 1899–1900); compared afterwards with the NPNF¹ 2 translation (Dods, 1887).
20.17CSEL 40:466–468
CAPUT XVII. De ecclesiae glorificatione sine fine post finem. Et ciuitatem, inquit, magnam Hierusalem nouam uidi descendentem de caelo a Deo, aptatam, quasi nouam nuptam ornatam marito suo. Et audiui uocem magnam de throno dicentem: Ecce tabernaculum Dei cum hominibus, et habitabit cum eis. et erunt ipsi populus eius, et ipse Deus erit cum eis. Et absterget omnem lacrimam ab oculis eorum: et mors iam non erit neque luctus neque clamor. sed nec dolor ullus, quia priora abierunt. Et dixit sedens in throno: Ecce noua facio omnia. De caelo descendere ista ciuitas dicitur, quoniam caelestis est gratia. qua Deus eam fecit. Propter quod ei dicit etiam per Esaiam: Ego sum Dominus faciens te. Et de caelo quidem ab initio sui descendit, ex quo per huius saeculi tempus gratia Dei desuper ueniente per lauacrum regenerationis in Spiritu sancto misso de caelo subinde ciues eius adcrescunt. Sed per iudicium Dei, quod erit nouissimum per eius filium Iesum Christum, tanta eius et tam noua de Dei munere claritas apparebit, ut nulla remaneant uestigia uetustatis; quando quidem et corpora ad incorruptionem adque inmortalitatem nouam ex uetere corruptione ac mortalitate transibunt. Nam hoc de isto tempore accipere, quo regnat cum rege suo mille annis, inpudentiae nimiae mihi uidetur, cum apertissime dicat: Absterget omnem lacrimam ab oculis eorum; et mors iam non erit neque luctus neque clamor, sed nec dolor ullus. Quis uero tam sit absurdus et obstinatissima contentione uesanus, qui audeat adfirmare in huius mortalitatis aerumnis, non dico populum sanctum, sed unumquemque sanctorum, qui hanc uel ducat uel ducturus sit uel duxerit uitam, nullas habentem lacrimas et dolores; cum potius quanto est quisque sanctior et desiderii sancti plenior, tanto sit eius in orando fletus uberior? An non est uox ciuitatis supernae Hierusalem: Factae sunt mihi lacrimae meae panis die ac nocte, et: Lauabo per singulas noctes lectum meum, in lacrimis meis stratum meum rigabo, et: Gemitus meus non est absconditus a te, et: Dolor meus renouatus est? Aut uero non eius filii sunt, qui ingemescunt grauati, in quo nolunt spoliari, sed superuestiri, ut absorbeatur mortale a uita? Nonne ipsi sunt, qui primitias habentes Spiritus in semet ipsis ingemescunt, adoptionem exspectantes, redemtionem corporis sui? An ipse apostolus Paulus non erat supernus Hierosolymitanus. uel non multo magis hoc erat, quando pro Israelitis carnalibus fratribus suis tristitia illi erat magna et continuus dolor cordi eius? Quando autem mors non erit in ista ciuitate, nisi quando dicetur: Ubi est, mors, contentio tua? Ubi est, mors, aculeus tuus? Aculeus autem mortis est peccatum. Quod tunc utique non erit, quando dicetur: Ubi est? Nunc uero non quilibet infimus ciuis illius ciuitatis, sed idem iste Iohannes in epistula sua clamat: Si dixerimus, quia peccatum non habemus, nos ipsos seducimus, et ueritas in nobis non est. Et in hoc quidem libro, cuius nomen est apocalypsis, obscure multa dicuntur, ut mentem legentis exerceant, et pauca in eo sunt, ex quorum manifestatione indagentur cetera cum labore; maxime quia sic eadem multis modis repetit, ut alia adque alia dicere uideatur, cum aliter adque aliter haec ipsa dicere uestigetur. Verum in his uerbis, ubi ait: Absterget omnem lacrimam ab oculis eorum, et mors iam non erit neque luctus neque clamor, sed nec dolor ullus, tanta luce dicta sunt de saeculo futuro et de inmortalitate adque aeternitate sanctorum (tunc enim solum adque ibi solum ista non erunt), ut nulla debeamus in litteris sacris quaerere uel legere manifesta, si haec putauerimus obscura.
Chapter 17. On the glorification of the church without end after the end.
“And I saw,” he says, “the great city, the new Jerusalem, coming down from heaven from God, made ready like a newly married bride adorned for her husband. And I heard a loud voice from the throne saying: ‘Behold, the dwelling of God is with men, and he will dwell with them, and they will be his people, and God himself will be with them. And he will wipe away every tear from their eyes; and death will be no more, nor mourning, nor crying, nor any pain, because the former things have passed away.’ And he who sat on the throne said: ‘Behold, I make all things new.’” This city is said to come down from heaven because the grace by which God made it is heavenly. That is why he says to it also through Isaiah: “I am the Lord who makes you.” It has indeed been coming down from heaven since its beginning, since its citizens continually increase through the time of this world by the grace of God that comes from above through the washing of regeneration in the Holy Spirit sent from heaven. But through God's judgment, which will be the last, through his Son Jesus Christ, so great and so new a splendor of it will appear by God's gift that no traces of the old will remain; since even bodies will pass from their old corruption and mortality to a new incorruption and immortality. For to take this of the present time, in which it reigns with its King for a thousand years, seems to me excessively shameless, when he says most plainly: “He will wipe away every tear from their eyes; and death will be no more, nor mourning, nor crying, nor any pain.” Who would be so absurd and so crazed with most obstinate contentiousness as to dare to assert that, amid the troubles of this mortality, not to say the holy people, but any single one of the saints, is leading, or will lead, or has led this life without tears and pains; when rather the holier each one is and the fuller of holy longing, the more abundant is his weeping in prayer? Is it not the voice of the citizen of the heavenly Jerusalem: “My tears have been my bread day and night,” and: “Every night I will wash my bed; I will drench my couch with my tears,” and: “My groaning is not hidden from you,” and: “My sorrow was renewed”? Or are they not its children who groan, being burdened, because they do not wish to be unclothed but further clothed, so that what is mortal may be swallowed up by life? Are they not the very ones who, having the firstfruits of the Spirit, groan within themselves, waiting for adoption, the redemption of their body? Was not the apostle Paul himself a citizen of the Jerusalem above, and was he not so all the more when he had great sorrow and unceasing pain in his heart for the Israelites, his brothers according to the flesh? But when will there be no death in that city, except when it will be said: “Where, O death, is your contention? Where, O death, is your sting? The sting of death is sin”? This certainly will not exist then, when it will be said, “Where is it?” But now it is not some lowly citizen of that city, but this same John who cries out in his letter: “If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us.” In this book, indeed, whose name is the Apocalypse, many things are said obscurely to exercise the mind of the reader, and there are few things in it from whose clarity the rest may be tracked down with labor; especially because it repeats the same things in many ways, so that it seems to be saying one thing after another, when it is found to be saying these same things in one way after another. But in these words, where he says, “He will wipe away every tear from their eyes, and death will be no more, nor mourning, nor crying, nor any pain,” things are said with such light about the world to come and the immortality and eternity of the saints (for only then and only there will these things not exist) that we ought not to look for or read anything plain in the sacred writings if we think these words obscure.
Rev 21:2–5 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 45:8 (quotation, medium confidence) · Titus 3:5 (allusion, high confidence) · Ps 42:3 (41:4 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 6:6 (6:7 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 38:9 (37:10 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 39:2 (38:3 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Cor 5:4 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 8:23 (quotation, high confidence) · Gal 4:26 (allusion, medium confidence) · Rom 9:2–3 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:55–56 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 John 1:8 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The new Jerusalem without tears or death belongs to the world to come, not to the present reign of the church, whose saints still weep and sin.
- Revelation 21:2–5; Isaiah 45:8 in the Old Latin/LXX form (“I am the Lord who made you”); Titus 3:5; Psalm 42:3 (LXX/Vulgate 41:4); 6:6 (6:7); 38:9 (37:10); 39:2 (38:3); 2 Corinthians 5:4; Romans 8:23; Galatians 4:26; Romans 9:2–3; 1 Corinthians 15:55–56 (“contention” reflects the Old Latin reading); 1 John 1:8.
Topics: Eschatology
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Civ. 20.17 (CSEL 40:466–468; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-civitate-dei/20-14/#p-20-17). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-civitate-dei-20-17) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Hoffmann's Latin text (CSEL 40, 1899–1900); compared afterwards with the NPNF¹ 2 translation (Dods, 1887).
20.18CSEL 40:468–470
CAPUT XVIII. Quid apostolus Petrus de nouissimo Dei iudicio praedicarit. Nunc iam uideamus, quid etiam apostolus Petrus de hoc iudicio scripserit: Venient, inquit, in nouissimo dierum inlusione inludentes, secundum proprias concupiscentias suas euntes et dicentes: Ubi est promissum praesentiae ipsius? Ex quo enim patres dormierunt, sic omnia perseuerant ab initio creaturae. Latet enim illos hoc uolentes, quia caeli erant olim et terra de aqua, et per aquam constituta Dei uerbo, per quae. qui tunc erat mundus, aqua inundatus deperiit. Qui autem nunc sunt caeli et terra, eodem uerbo repositi sunt, igni reseruandi in diem iudicii et perditionis hominum inpiorum. Hoc unum uero non lateat uos, carissimi, quia unus dies aput Dominum sicut mille anni et mille anni sicut dies unus. Non tardat Dominus promissum, sicut quidam tarditatem existimant; sed patienter fert propter uos, nolens aliquem perire, sed omnes in paenitentiam conuerti. Veniet autem dies Domini ut fur, in quo caeli magno inpetu transcurrent, elementa autem ardentia resoluentur et terra et quae in ipsa sunt opera exurentur. His ergo omnibus pereuntibus quales oportet esse uos in sanctis conuersationibus exspectantes et properantes ad praesentiam diei Domini, per quam caeli ardentes soluentur et elementa ignis ardore decoquentur? Nouos uero caelos et terram nouam secundum promissa ipsius exspectamus, in quibus iustitia inhabitat. Nihil hic dixit de resurrectione mortuorum, sed sane de perditione mundi huius satis. Ubi etiam commemorans factum ante diluuium uidetur admonuisse quodam modo, quatenus in fine huius saeculi mundum istum periturum esse credamus. Nam et illo tempore perisse dixit, qui tunc erat, mundum; nec solum orbem terrae, uerum etiam caelos, quos utique istos aenos intellegimus, quorum locum ac spatium tunc aqua crescendo superauerat. Ergo totus aut paene totus aer iste uentosus (quod caelum uel potius caelos uocat, sed utique istos imos, non illos supremos, ubi sol et luna et sidera constituta sunt) conuersus fuerat in umidam qualitatem adque hoc modo cum terra perierat, cuius terrae utique prior facies fuerat deleta diluuio. Qui autem nunc sunt, inquit, caeli et terra, eodem uerbo repositi sunt, igni reseruandi in diem iudicii et perditionis hominum inpiorum. Proinde qui caeli et quae terra, id est, qui mundus pro eo mundo, qui diluuio periit, ex eadem aqua repositus est, ipse igni nouissimo reseruatur in diem iudicii et perditionis hominum inpiorum. Nam et hominum propter magnam quandam commutationem non dubitat dicere perditionem futuram, cum tamen eorum quamuis in aeternis poenis sit mansura natura. Quaerat forsitan aliquis, si post factum iudicium iste mundus ardebit, antequam pro illo caelum nouum et terra noua reponatur, eo ipso tempore conflagrationis eius ubi erunt sancti, cum eos habentes corpora in aliquo corporali loco esse necesse sit. Possumus respondere futuros eos esse in superioribus partibus, quo ita non adscendet flamma illius incendii, quem ad modum nec unda diluuii. Talia quippe illis inerunt corpora, ut illic sint, ubi esse uoluerint. Sed nec ignem conflagrationis illius pertimescent inmortales adque incorruptibiles facti, si uirorum trium corruptibilia corpora adque mortalia in camino ardenti inlaesa uiuere potuerunt.
Chapter 18. What the apostle Peter proclaimed about God's last judgment.
Let us now see what the apostle Peter also wrote about this judgment. “In the last days,” he says, “scoffers will come with scoffing, following their own desires and saying: ‘Where is the promise of his presence? For since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of creation.’ For they willingly overlook this, that there were heavens of old, and an earth formed out of water and through water by the word of God, through which the world that then existed was flooded with water and perished. But the heavens and earth that now exist have been stored up by the same word, kept for fire until the day of judgment and destruction of ungodly men. But do not let this one thing escape you, beloved, that one day with the Lord is as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day. The Lord is not slow about his promise, as some count slowness, but is patient for your sake, not wishing any to perish but all to turn to repentance. But the day of the Lord will come like a thief, in which the heavens will pass away with a great rush, and the elements will be dissolved with burning, and the earth and the works that are in it will be burned up. Since all these things are thus to perish, what sort of people ought you to be in holy conduct, waiting for and hastening to the presence of the day of the Lord, through which the heavens will be set on fire and dissolved, and the elements will melt with the heat of fire? But according to his promises we wait for new heavens and a new earth, in which righteousness dwells.” He said nothing here about the resurrection of the dead, but certainly enough about the destruction of this world. And by recalling there what happened before the flood he seems in a way to have warned us to what extent we should believe that this world will perish at the end of this age. For he said that the world which then existed perished at that time too; and not only the globe of the earth but also the heavens, by which we understand, of course, these airy heavens, whose place and space the water then overtopped as it rose. So the whole, or almost the whole, of this windy air (which he calls heaven, or rather heavens, but certainly these lowest ones, not those highest ones where the sun and moon and stars are set) had been turned into a moist quality and in this way had perished with the earth, whose former face had certainly been destroyed by the flood. “But the heavens and earth that now exist,” he says, “have been stored up by the same word, kept for fire until the day of judgment and destruction of ungodly men.” Therefore the heavens and the earth, that is, the world which was restored out of the same water in place of the world that perished in the flood, is itself kept for the last fire until the day of judgment and destruction of ungodly men. For he does not hesitate to speak of a future destruction of men too, because of a certain great change, although their nature will remain, even though in eternal punishments.
Someone may perhaps ask: if this world will burn after the judgment has taken place, before a new heaven and a new earth are put in its place, where will the saints be at the very time of its conflagration, since, having bodies, they must be in some bodily place? We can answer that they will be in the upper regions, to which the flame of that fire will not rise, just as the wave of the flood did not. For they will have such bodies that they can be wherever they wish. But having become immortal and incorruptible, they will not fear the fire of that conflagration either, if the corruptible and mortal bodies of the three men were able to live unharmed in the burning furnace.
2 Pet 3:3–13 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 7:17–20 (allusion, medium confidence) · Dan 3:25 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Peter's second letter foretells that the present heavens and earth, restored after the flood, will be destroyed by fire at the judgment; the saints, immortal, will be untouched by that fire.
- 2 Peter 3:3–13; Daniel 3:19–27 (the three young men in the furnace). The digital text reads “istos aenos” for the heavens destroyed in the flood, probably for “aerios” (“airy”); translated by that sense. Augustine distinguishes the lower, airy heavens from the upper heavens of the stars.
Topics: Eschatology
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Civ. 20.18 (CSEL 40:468–470; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-civitate-dei/20-14/#p-20-18). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-civitate-dei-20-18) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Hoffmann's Latin text (CSEL 40, 1899–1900); compared afterwards with the NPNF¹ 2 translation (Dods, 1887).
20.19CSEL 40:470–475
CAPUT XVIIII. Quid apostolus Paulus Thessalonicensibus scripserit de manifestatione Antichristi, cuius tempus dies Domini subsequetur. Multas euangelicas apostolicasque sententias de diuino isto iudicio nouissimo uideo mihi esse praetereundas, ne hoc uolumen in nimiam longitudinem prouoluatur; sed nullo modo est praetereundus apostolus Paulus, qui scribens ad Thessalonicenses: Rogamus, inquit, uos, fratres, per aduentum Domini nostri Iesu Christi et nostrae congregationis in ipsum, ut non cito moueamini mente neque terreamini neque per spiritum neque per uerbum neque per epistulam tamquam per nos, quasi instet dies Domini, ne quis uos seducat ullo modo; quoniam nisi uenerit refuga primum et reuelatus fuerit homo peccati, filius interitus, qui aduersatur et superextollitur supra omne, quod dicitur Deus aut quod colitur, ita ut in templo dei sedeat, ostentans se tamquam sit Deus. Non retinetis in memoria, quod adhuc cum essem aput uos haec dicebantur uobis? et nunc quid. detineat scitis, ut reueletur in suo tempore. Iam enim mysterium iniquitatis operatur. Tantum qui modo tenet teneat, donec de medio fiat; et tunc reuelabitur iniquus, quem Dominus Iesus interficiet spiritu oris sui, et euacuabit inluminatione praesentiae suae eum, cuius est praesentia secundum operationem satanae, in omni uirtute et signis et prodigiis mendacii et in omni seductione iniquitatis his, qui pereunt, pro eo quod dilectionem ueritatis non receperunt, ut salui fierent. Et ideo mittet illis Deus operationem erroris, ut credant mendacio et iudicentur omnes, qui non crediderunt ueritati, sed consenserunt iniquitati. Nulli dubium est eum de Antichristo ista dixisse, diemque iudicii (hunc enim appellat diem Domini) non esse uenturum, nisi ille prior uenerit, quem refugam uocat, utique a Domino Deo. Quod si de omnibus inpiis merito dici potest, quanto magis de isto! Sed in quo templo Dei sit sessurus, incertum est; utrum in illa ruina templi, quod a Salomone rege constructum est, an uero in ecclesia. Non enim templum alicuius idoli aut daemonis templum Dei apostolus diceret. Unde nonnulli non ipsum principem, sed uniuersum quodam modo corpus eius, id est ad eum pertinentem hominum. multitudinem, simul cum ipso suo principe hoc loco intellegi Antichristum uolunt; rectiusque putant etiam Latine dici, sicut in Graeco est, non in templo Dei, sed in templum Dei sedeat, tamquam ipse sit templum Dei, quod est ecclesia; sicut dicimus; Sedet in amicum, id est uelut amicus, uel si quid aliud isto locutionis genere dici solet. Quod autem ait: Et nunc quid detineat scitis, id est, quid sit in mora, quae causa sit dilationis eius, ut reueletur in suo tempore, scitis: quoniam scire illos dixit, aperte hoc dicere noluit. Et ideo nos, qui nescimus quod illi sciebant, peruenire cum labore ad id, quod sensit apostolus, cupimus nec ualemus; praesertim quia et illa, quae addidit, hunc sensum faciunt obscuriorem. Nam quid est: Iam enim mysterium iniquitatis operatur. Tantum qui modo tenet teneat, donec de medio fiat; et tunc reuelabitur iniquus? Ego prorsus quid dixerit me fateor ignorare. Suspiciones tamen hominum, quas uel audire uel legere potui, non tacebo. Quidam putant hoc de imperio dictum fuisse Romano. et propterea Paulum apostolum non id aperte scribere uoluisse. ne calumniam uidelicet incurreret, quod Romano imperio male optauerit, cum speraretur aeternum; ut hoc quod dixit: Iam enim mysterium iniquitatis operatur, Neronem uoluerit intellegi, cuius iam facta uelut Antichristi uidebantur. Unde nonnulli ipsum resurrecturum et futurum Antichristum suspicantur; alii uero nec occisum putant, sed subtractum potius, ut putaretur occisus, et uiuum occultari in uigore ipsius aetatis, in qua fuit, cum crederetur exstinctus, donec suo tempore reueletur et restituatur in regnum. Sed multum mihi mira est haec opinantium tanta praesumtio. Illud tamen, quod ait apostolus: Tantum qui modo tenet teneat, donec de medio fiat, non absurde de ipso Romano imperio creditur dictum, tamquam dictum sit: Tantum qui modo imperat imperet, donec de medio fiat, id est de medio tollatur. Et tunc reuelabitur iniquus, quem significari Antichristum nullus ambigit. Alii uero et quod ait: Quid detineat scitis et mysterium operari iniquitatis non putant dictum nisi de malis et fictis, qui sunt in ecclesia, donec perueniant ad tantum numerum, qui Antichristo magnum populum faciat; et hoc esse mysterium iniquitatis, quia uidetur occultum; hortari autem apostolum fideles, ut in fide quam tenent tenaciter perseuerent, dicendo: Tantum qui modo tenet teneat, donec de medio fiat, hoc. est, donec exeat de medio ecclesiae mysterium iniquitatis, quod nunc occultum est. Ad ipsum enim mysterium pertinere arbitrantur, quod ait in epistula sua Iohannes euangelista: Pueri, nouissima hora est; et sicut audistis, quod Antichristus sit uenturus, nunc autem Antichristi multi facti sunt; unde cognoscimus quod nouissima sit hora. Ex nobis exierunt; sed non erant ex nobis. Quod si fuissent ex nobis, permansissent utique nobiscum. Sicut ergo ante finem in hac hora, inquiunt, quam Iohannes nouissimam dicit, exierunt multi haeretici de medio ecclesiae, quos multos dicit Antichristos: ita omnes tunc inde exibunt, qui non ad Christum, sed ad illum nouissimum Antichristum pertinebunt, et tunc reuelabitur. Alius ergo sic, alius autem sic apostoli obscura uerba coniectant; quod tamen eum dixisse non dubium est: non ueniet ad uiuos et mortuos iudicandos Christus, nisi prius uenerit ad seducendos in anima mortuos aduersarius eius Antichristus; quamuis ad occultum iam iudicium Dei pertineat, quod ab illo seducentur. Praesentia quippe eius erit, sicut dictum est, secundum operationem satanae in omni uirtute et signis et prodigiis mendacii et in omni seductione iniquitatis his, qui pereunt. Tunc enim soluetur satanas et per illum Antichristum in omni sua uirtute mirabiliter quidem, sed mendaciter operabitur. Quae solet ambigi utrum propterea dicta sint signa et prodigia mendacii, quoniam mortales sensus per phantasmata decepturus est, ut quod non facit facere uideatur, an quia illa ipsa, etiamsi erunt uera prodigia, ad mendacium pertrahent credituros non ea potuisse nisi diuinitus fieri, uirtutem diaboli nescientes, maxime quando tantam, quantam numquam habuit, acceperit potestatem. Non enim quando de caelo ignis cecidit et tantam familiam cum tantis gregibus pecorum sancti Iob uno inpetu absumsit et turbo inruens et domum deiciens filios eius occidit, phantasmata fuerunt; quae tamen fuerunt opera satanae, cui Deus dederat hanc potestatem. Propter quid horum ergo dicta sint prodigia et signa mendacii, tunc potius apparebit. Sed propter quodlibet horum dictum sit. seducentur eis signis adque prodigiis. qui seduci merebuntur, pro eo quod dilectionem, inquit, ueritatis non receperunt, ut salui fierent. Nec dubitauit apostolus addere ac dicere: Ideo mittet illis Deus operationem erroris ut credant mendacio. Deus enim mittet, quia Deus diabolum facere ista permittet, iusto ipse iudicio, quamuis faciat ille iniquo malignoque consilio: Ut iudicentur, inquit, omnes, qui non crediderunt ueritati, sed consenserunt iniquitati. Proinde iudicati seducentur et seducti iudicabuntur. Sed iudicati seducentur illis iudiciis Dei occulte iustis, iuste occultis, quibus ab initio peccati rationalis creaturae numquam iudicare cessauit; seducti autem iudicabuntur nouissimo manifestoque iudicio per Christum Iesum, iustissime iudicaturum, iniustissime iudicatum.
Chapter 19. What the apostle Paul wrote to the Thessalonians about the revealing of Antichrist, whose time the day of the Lord will follow.
I see that I must pass over many sayings of the Gospels and the apostles about this last divine judgment, so that this volume does not run on to excessive length; but in no way must I pass over the apostle Paul, who, writing to the Thessalonians, says: “We ask you, brothers, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ and our gathering to him, not to be quickly shaken in mind or alarmed, either by a spirit or by a word or by a letter as if from us, to the effect that the day of the Lord is at hand. Let no one deceive you in any way; for unless the deserter comes first and the man of sin is revealed, the son of perdition, who opposes and exalts himself above everything that is called God or is worshiped, so that he sits in the temple of God, displaying himself as if he were God. Do you not remember that when I was still with you these things were told you? And now you know what is holding him back, so that he may be revealed in his own time. For the mystery of iniquity is already at work. Only let him who now holds hold on, until he is out of the way; and then the lawless one will be revealed, whom the Lord Jesus will slay with the breath of his mouth and will destroy by the brightness of his presence; the one whose presence is by the working of Satan, with all power and signs and lying wonders, and with all the deception of iniquity for those who are perishing, because they did not receive the love of the truth so as to be saved. And therefore God will send them a working of error, so that they believe a lie, and that all may be judged who did not believe the truth but consented to iniquity.”
No one doubts that he said these things of Antichrist, and that the day of judgment (for he calls this the day of the Lord) will not come unless he comes first whom he calls a deserter, a deserter, that is, from the Lord God. If this can rightly be said of all the ungodly, how much more of him! But in what temple of God he will sit is uncertain: whether in the ruin of the temple which was built by King Solomon, or in the church. For the apostle would not call the temple of some idol or demon the temple of God. Hence some would have Antichrist in this place understood to be not the prince himself alone, but in a way his whole body, that is, the multitude of people belonging to him, together with their prince; and they think it would be more correct to say in Latin too, as it is in the Greek, not “in the temple of God” but “he sits as the temple of God,” as if he himself were the temple of God, which is the church; as we say “he sits as a friend,” that is, like a friend, or anything else that is usually said with this kind of expression.
As to his saying, “And now you know what is holding him back,” that is, what the delay is, what the cause of his postponement is, “so that he may be revealed in his own time”: since he said they knew, he did not wish to say it openly. And so we, who do not know what they knew, desire to reach with labor what the apostle meant, and cannot; especially because what he added makes this sense more obscure. For what does this mean: “For the mystery of iniquity is already at work. Only let him who now holds hold on, until he is out of the way; and then the lawless one will be revealed”? I confess that I do not know at all what he meant. Yet I will not keep silent about the conjectures of people which I have been able to hear or read. Some think this was said of the Roman empire, and that the apostle Paul did not wish to write it openly so as not to incur the charge of wishing ill to the Roman empire, which was hoped to be eternal; so that by his saying, “For the mystery of iniquity is already at work,” he meant Nero to be understood, whose deeds already seemed like those of Antichrist. Hence some suspect that Nero himself will rise again and be Antichrist; others, however, think that he was not even killed, but rather withdrawn so that he might be thought killed, and that he is hidden alive in the vigor of the very age he was when he was believed dead, until he is revealed in his own time and restored to his kingdom. But the great presumption of those who hold this opinion is very strange to me. Yet what the apostle says, “Only let him who now holds hold on, until he is out of the way,” is not absurdly believed to have been said of the Roman empire itself, as if it were said: “Only let him who now rules rule on, until he is out of the way,” that is, removed. “And then the lawless one will be revealed,” by whom no one doubts that Antichrist is signified.
Others, however, think that both “you know what is holding him back” and “the mystery of iniquity is at work” were said only of the wicked and the pretenders who are in the church, until they reach so great a number as to make a great people for Antichrist; and that this is the mystery of iniquity because it seems hidden; and that the apostle exhorts the faithful to persevere tenaciously in the faith they hold by saying, “Only let him who now holds hold on, until he is out of the way,” that is, until the mystery of iniquity, which is now hidden, goes out from the midst of the church. For they think that what John the evangelist says in his letter belongs to this same mystery: “Children, it is the last hour; and as you have heard that Antichrist is coming, so now many antichrists have arisen; by this we know that it is the last hour. They went out from us, but they were not of us. If they had been of us, they would surely have remained with us.” “As, then, before the end, in this hour which John calls the last,” they say, “many heretics went out from the midst of the church, whom he calls many antichrists, so then all will go out from there who belong not to Christ but to that last Antichrist, and then he will be revealed.”
So one conjectures the apostle's obscure words in one way, another in another; yet what he undoubtedly said is this: Christ will not come to judge the living and the dead unless his adversary Antichrist first comes to deceive those who are dead in soul; although that they will be deceived by him already belongs to the hidden judgment of God. For his presence will be, as was said, “by the working of Satan, with all power and signs and lying wonders, and with all the deception of iniquity for those who are perishing.” For then Satan will be loosed, and through that Antichrist he will work in all his power, marvelously indeed, but deceitfully. It is commonly questioned whether these are called signs and lying wonders because he will deceive mortal senses by phantasms, so that he seems to do what he does not do, or because these very things, even if they are true wonders, will draw to a lie those who will believe that they could only have been done by God, not knowing the power of the devil, especially when he has received such power as he never had before. For when fire fell from heaven and in one assault consumed the great household of holy Job with his great flocks and herds, and a whirlwind rushed in and threw down the house and killed his children, these were not phantasms; yet they were works of Satan, to whom God had given this power. For which of these reasons, then, they are called lying wonders and signs will rather appear at that time. But for whichever of these reasons it is said, those will be deceived by these signs and wonders who will deserve to be deceived, “because,” he says, “they did not receive the love of the truth so as to be saved.” Nor did the apostle hesitate to go on and say: “Therefore God will send them a working of error, so that they believe a lie.” God will send it, because God will permit the devil to do these things, he himself by a just judgment, although the devil does them with an unjust and malicious purpose; “so that,” he says, “all may be judged who did not believe the truth but consented to iniquity.” Therefore, having been judged, they will be deceived, and having been deceived, they will be judged. But having been judged, they will be deceived by those judgments of God which are hiddenly just and justly hidden, by which he has never ceased to judge since the first sin of the rational creation; and having been deceived, they will be judged by the last and open judgment through Christ Jesus, who will judge most justly, who was judged most unjustly.
2 Thess 2:1–11 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 John 2:18–19 (quotation, high confidence) · Job 1:16 (allusion, high confidence) · Job 1:19 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Augustine reads 2 Thessalonians 2 as foretelling Antichrist before the day of the Lord, confesses he does not know what “holds him back”, and reports without endorsing the views that it is the Roman empire or hidden evil within the church.
- 2 Thessalonians 2:1–11; 1 John 2:18–19; Job 1:16, 19. Augustine says plainly that he does not know what Paul meant by what “holds back”; he reports the views that it is the Roman empire and that it is the hidden wicked within the church, and rejects as presumptuous the legend that Nero will return as Antichrist. “Deserter” renders “refuga” (Greek apostasia, “the apostasy”). “He sits as the temple of God” renders “in templum Dei sedeat” (Greek eis ton naon).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR u for n; line-end hyphen and stray period; words run together): couiectant → coniectant; nonreceperunt → non receperunt; rationa-. lis → rationalis.
Topics: Eschatology
Cite (SBL): Augustine, Civ. 20.19 (CSEL 40:470–475; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-civitate-dei/20-14/#p-20-19). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-civitate-dei-20-19) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Hoffmann's Latin text (CSEL 40, 1899–1900); compared afterwards with the NPNF¹ 2 translation (Dods, 1887).