Homilies on Luke 6–9
Latin text: Migne, PL 26 (Latin text: Migne, Patrologia Latina, digitized by Open Greek and Latin (patrologia_latina-dev, University of Leipzig), CC BY-SA 4.0).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0).
Chapter 6
6PL 26:230a–232d
De eo quod scriptum est: Cum autem concepisset Elizabeth, absconderat se: usque ad eum locum ubi ait: Hic erit magnus. Cap. I. Quando concepit Elizabeth, abscondebat se mensibus quinque, dicens: Quia sic mihi fecit Dominus in diebus, quibus respexit auferre opprobrium meum in hominibus. Quaero quam ob causam postquam intellexit se esse praegnantem, publicum declinarit? Ni fallor, hoc est etiam quod hi qui nuptiis copulati sunt, non omne tempus coitus liberum inter se habent; sed est tempus quando recedunt ab opere nuptiarum. Si enim vir senex fuerit et mulier anus, pudoris est maximi servire eos libidini, servire conjugio, quae vel cur® corporis et senectae esse Dei videntur voluntate sublata. Haec autem, quae ad sermonem angeli et dispensationem Dei rursum fuerat viro copulata, erubescat quod anus et pene decrepita ad opus juvenum revertisset. Unde et abscondebat se mensibus quinque: non usque ad nonum mensem, donec partus ingrueret; sed usquequo conciperet Maria. Quando enim illa concepit, et venit ad eam, et facta est salutatio in aures ejus, exsultavit in gaudio infans in utero Elizabeth, et prophetavit Spiritu sancto plena, et locuta est quae evangelicus sermo describit: Et diffamata sunt super omnem montanam verba haec. Quando enim in populo rumor egressus est habere eam in utero prophetam, et aliquid majus esse homine qui gestabatur a Virgine, tunc non absconditur, sed tota libertate se prodit, et exsultat se habere Praecursorem in utero Salvatoris. Deinde Scriptura commemorat, quod mense sexto conceptus Elizabeth missus sit angelus Gabriel a Deo in civitatem Galilaeae, cujus nomen Nazareth, ad Virginem desponsatam viro, cui nomen Joseph de domo David, et nomen Virginis, Maria. Rursum in mea mente volvens quaero, quare Deus, cum semel Salvatorem judicaret nasci ex virgine, non elegit puellam absque sponso, sed eam potissimum quae jam fuerat desponsata. Et nisi fallor, haec causa est. Debuit de ea virgine nasci, quae non solum sponsum haberet; sed, ut Matthaeus scribit, jam viro tradita fuerat, licet eam vir necdum nosset (Matth. I), ne turpitudinem virginis habitus ipse monstraret, si virgo videretur utero tumenti. Unde eleganter in cujusdam martyris epistola scriptum reperi, Ignatium dico episcopum Antiochae post Petrum secundum, qui in persecutione Romae pugnavit ad bestias: Principem saeculi hujus latuit virginitas Mariae: latuit propter Joseph: latuit propter nuptias: latuit quia virum habere putabatur. Si enim non habuisset sponsum, et ut putabatur, virum, nequaquam potuisset principi mundi hujus abscondi. Statim enim cogitatio diaboli tacita subrepsisset: quomodo ista, quae non concubuit cum viro, praegnans est? Debet iste conceptus esse divinus, debet aliquid humana natura esse sublimius. Econtrario disposuerat Salvator, dispensationem suam et assumptionem corporis ignorare diabolum: unde et in generatione sua celavit eam; et discipulis postea praecipiebat, ne manifestum eum facerent. Et cum ab ipso diabolo tentaretur, nusquam confessus est Dei se esse Filium, sed tantummodo respondebat: Non oportet ut adorem te, nec ut lapides istos panes faciam, ut me de alto praecipitem (Matth. iv). Et cum ista diceret, tacuit semper se esse Filium Dei. Quaere et in alia Scriptura, et reperies voluntatis Christi fuisse, ut adventum Filii Dei diabolus ignoraret. Apostolus enim passionem ejus asserens nescisse contrarias fortitudines, ait: Sapientiam loquimur inter perfectos. Sapientiam autem non soeculi hujus, neque principum soeculi hujus qui destruuntur; sed loquimur Dei sapientiam in mysterio absconditam, quam nullus principum hujus soeculi cognovit. Si enim cognovissent, numquam Dominum gloriae crucifixissent (I Cor.ii). Absconditum igitur fuit a principibus saeculi mysterium Salvatoris. Quod autem econtrario objici potest, solvendum mihi videtur antequam ab alio praeponatur, qua ratione quod principes hujus saeculi latuit, daemonem non latuit, eum praesertim qui in Evangelio loquebatur: Venisti ante tempus torquere nos, scimus te qui sis Filius Dei (Matth. IX). Sed considera, quia minor in malitia noverit Salvatorem: qui vero major est in scelere, et versipellis, et nequam, ex eo ipso, quod in malo major est, impeditur nosse Filium Dei. Nos quoque ipsi, si minus habuerimus mali, facilius possumus ad virtutem procedere. Si vero magis in nobis fuerit mali, ingenti sudandum est, ut majori malitia liberemur. Haec de eo quod sponsum habuerit Maria. Quia vero angelus novo sermone Mariam salutavit, quem in omni Scriptura invenire non potui, et de hoc pauca dicenda sunt. Id enim quod ait: Ave, gratia plena, quod Graece dicitur, κεχαριτωμένη, ubi in Scripturis alibi legerim non recordor; sed neque ad virum istiusmodi sermo est, Salve, gratia plena. Soli Mariae haec salutatio servatur. Si enim scisset Maria et ad alium quempiam similem factum esse sermonem, habebat quippe legis scientiam, et erat sancta, et prophetarum vaticinia quotidiana meditatione cognoverat, numquam quasi peregrina eam salutatio terruisset. Propter quod loquitur ei angelus: Ne timeas, Maria, invenisti enim gratiam coram Domino. Ecce concipies in utero, et paries filium, et vocabis nomen ejus Jesum. Is erit magnus, et Filius Altissimi vocabitur. Dicitur et de Joanne, erit magnus: et hoc ipsum Gabriel angelus contestatur; sed quando venit Jesus vere magnus, vere sublimis, ille qui prius magnus fuerat, minor effectus est. Ille enim, inquit, fuit lucerna ardens et lucens, et vos voluistis ad horam exsultare in lumine ejus (Joan. v). Magnitudo Salvatoris nostri non tunc apparuit quando natus est; sed nunc postquam oppressa ab adversariis videbatur, emicuit. Vide magnitudinem Domini: In omnem terram exivit sonus doctrinae ejus, et in fines orbis terrarum verba illius (Psal. XVIII). Dominus noster Jesus, qui virtus est Dei (Rom. I, et I Cor. I), in omnem diffusus est orbem, et impraesentiarum nobiscum est, juxta illud quod in apostolo legitur: Congregatis vobis et Spiritu meo cum virtute Domini nostri Jesu Christi (I Cor. V). Virtus Domini Salvatoris et cum his est, qui ab orbe nostro in Britannia dividuntur, et cum his qui in Mauritania, et cum universis qui sub sole in nomine ejus crediderunt. Vide ergo magnitudinem Salvatoris, quomodo in toto orbe diffusa sil, et certe necdum ejus veram magnitudinem exposui. Ascende in coelos, et vide eum, quomodo coelestia repleverit. Apparuit siquidem angelis. Descende cogitatione in abyssos, et videbis eum etiam illuc descendisse. Qui enim descendit, ipse est et qui ascendit, ut impleret omnia, ut in nomine Jesu omne genu flectatur, coelestium, terrestrium, et infernorum (Ephes.IV). Considera virtutem Domini, quod impleverit mundum, id est, coelestia, terrestria, et infernalia, quomodo et coelum ipsum penetravit, et in superna ascenderit. Legimus enim, quod pertransierit coelos Filius Dei (Hebr. IV). Si haec videris, pariter intueberis non transitorie dictum: Magnus erit; sed verbum opere completum. Magnus est Dominus noster Jesus, et praesens, et absens, tribuitque consortium fortitudinis suae huic coetui nostro atque conventui: quod ut et singuli mereamur accipere, deprecemur Dominum Deum, cui esi gloria et imperium in saecula saeculorum, Amen.
On the text: “When Elizabeth had conceived, she hid herself,” up to the place where he says, “He will be great.” Chapter 1. When Elizabeth conceived, she hid herself for five months, saying, “Thus the Lord has done to me in the days when he looked on me, to take away my reproach among men.” I ask why, after she understood that she was pregnant, she avoided being seen in public. Unless I am mistaken, it is this: even those who are joined in marriage do not have every time free for intercourse with each other; there is a time when they withdraw from the work of marriage. For if the husband is old and the wife aged, it is a matter of the greatest shame for them to serve desire and to serve the marriage bed, when these things seem, by God’s will, to have been taken away from them by the condition of the body and by old age. So she, who at the angel’s word and by God’s dispensation had been joined again to her husband, was ashamed that, old and almost decrepit, she had returned to the work of the young. That is why she hid herself for five months: not until the ninth month, when the birth was coming on, but until Mary conceived. For when Mary conceived and came to her, and Mary’s greeting sounded in her ears, the infant leaped for joy in Elizabeth’s womb, and she prophesied, filled with the Holy Spirit, and spoke the words the Gospel narrative records; “and these words were talked about through all the hill country.” For when the rumour went out among the people that she had a prophet in her womb, and that the one carried by the Virgin was something greater than a man, then she no longer hides herself but shows herself in full freedom and exults that she carries in her womb the Forerunner of the Saviour. Next the Scripture records that in the sixth month of Elizabeth’s pregnancy the angel Gabriel was sent from God to a city of Galilee named Nazareth, to a virgin betrothed to a man whose name was Joseph, of the house of David, and the virgin’s name was Mary. Again, turning it over in my mind, I ask why God, once he had decided that the Saviour should be born of a virgin, did not choose a girl without a betrothed, but precisely one who was already betrothed. Unless I am mistaken, this is the reason. He had to be born of a virgin who not only had a betrothed but, as Matthew writes, had already been given to her husband, though her husband did not yet know her (Matt 1:18, 25), so that her very condition might not display the shame of a virgin, if a virgin were seen with a swelling womb. Hence I have found it finely written in the letter of a certain martyr, I mean Ignatius, the second bishop of Antioch after Peter, who in a persecution fought with the beasts at Rome: “The virginity of Mary was hidden from the prince of this age.” It was hidden because of Joseph, hidden because of the marriage, hidden because she was thought to have a husband. For if she had not had a betrothed and, as was thought, a husband, she could never have been hidden from the prince of this world. At once the devil’s silent thought would have crept in: How is this woman, who has not lain with a man, pregnant? This conception must be divine; it must be something more sublime than human nature. On the contrary, the Saviour had arranged that the devil should not know of his dispensation and his taking up of a body; so in his birth he concealed it, and later he commanded his disciples not to make him known. And when he was tempted by the devil himself, he nowhere confessed that he was the Son of God, but only answered that it was not right for him to worship the devil, or to make these stones bread, or to throw himself down from on high (Matt 4:3–10). And in saying these things he always kept silent that he was the Son of God. Look in another Scripture too, and you will find that it was Christ’s will that the devil should not know of the coming of the Son of God. For the apostle, declaring that the opposing powers did not know of his passion, says: “We speak wisdom among the perfect; but not the wisdom of this age, nor of the rulers of this age, who are being destroyed; but we speak the wisdom of God hidden in a mystery, which none of the rulers of this age knew. For if they had known, they would never have crucified the Lord of glory” (1 Cor 2:6–8). The mystery of the Saviour, then, was hidden from the rulers of this age. But an objection that can be raised against this ought, I think, to be resolved before someone else puts it forward: how was what was hidden from the rulers of this age not hidden from a demon, especially the one who said in the Gospel, “You have come before the time to torment us; we know who you are, the Son of God” (Matt 8:29)? But consider that one lesser in wickedness knew the Saviour; whereas one who is greater in crime, crafty and wicked, is hindered from knowing the Son of God by the very fact that he is greater in evil. We too, if we have less evil in us, can more easily advance to virtue; but if there is more evil in us, we must sweat greatly to be freed from the greater wickedness. So much for Mary’s having a betrothed. But since the angel greeted Mary with a new expression, which I could not find anywhere in Scripture, a few words must be said about this too. For what he says, “Hail, full of grace,” which in Greek is κεχαριτωμένη, I do not remember having read anywhere else in the Scriptures; nor is such an expression, “Hail, full of grace,” ever addressed to a man. This greeting is reserved for Mary alone. For if Mary had known that a similar expression had been addressed to anyone else (and she had knowledge of the law, and was holy, and had come to know the oracles of the prophets by daily meditation), the greeting would never have frightened her as something strange. That is why the angel says to her: “Do not fear, Mary, for you have found favour with the Lord. Behold, you will conceive in your womb and bear a son, and you will call his name Jesus. He will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High.” It is said of John too, “He will be great,” and the angel Gabriel himself testifies to it; but when Jesus came, truly great, truly exalted, he who had been great before became less. For “he,” it says, “was a burning and shining lamp, and you were willing to rejoice for an hour in his light” (John 5:35). The greatness of our Saviour did not appear when he was born; but now, after it seemed crushed by his adversaries, it has shone out. See the greatness of the Lord: “The sound of his teaching has gone out into all the earth, and his words to the ends of the world” (Ps 19:4). Our Lord Jesus, who is the power of God (1 Cor 1:24), has spread through the whole world and is here with us now, according to what we read in the apostle: “When you are gathered together, and my spirit, with the power of our Lord Jesus Christ” (1 Cor 5:4). The power of the Lord Saviour is with those who are separated from our world in Britain, and with those in Mauretania, and with all under the sun who have believed in his name. See, then, the greatness of the Saviour, how it has spread through the whole world; and yet I have not yet set out his true greatness. Ascend to the heavens and see how he has filled the heavenly places; for he appeared to the angels. Descend in thought into the abysses, and you will see that he went down even there. For “he who descended is the same who ascended, that he might fill all things,” so that “at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, on earth, and under the earth” (Eph 4:10; Phil 2:10). Consider the power of the Lord, that he has filled the world, that is, the heavenly, the earthly, and the infernal regions, how he has passed through heaven itself and ascended to the heights. For we read that the Son of God passed through the heavens (Heb 4:14). If you see these things, you will at the same time perceive that “He will be great” was not said in passing, but is a word fulfilled in deed. Great is our Lord Jesus, both present and absent, and he grants a share of his strength to this gathering and assembly of ours. That each of us may deserve to receive it, let us pray to the Lord God, to whom be glory and dominion for ever and ever. Amen.
Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.
Luke 1:24 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 1:25 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 1:41 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 1:65 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 1:26 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 1:27 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 1:18 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 1:25 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 16:20 (allusion, medium confidence) · Matt 4:3 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 4:6 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 4:10 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 2:6 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 2:7 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 2:8 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 8:29 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 1:28 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 1:30 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 1:31 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 1:32 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 1:15 (allusion, high confidence) · John 5:35 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 19:4 (18:5 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 1:24 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 5:4 (quotation, high confidence) · Eph 4:10 (quotation, high confidence) · Phil 2:10 (quotation, high confidence) · Heb 4:14 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Elizabeth hid from modesty; Christ was born of a betrothed virgin so that his birth would be hidden from the devil; the angel’s “full of grace” is a greeting unique to Mary; and Christ’s greatness now fills the world.
- Origen’s explanation of why Elizabeth hid herself (Luke 1:24) as modesty about renewed marital relations in old age is his own conjecture, translated as written. The Ignatius quotation is Ign. Eph. 19.1, cited freely. “Full of grace” renders Jerome’s gratia plena for κεχαριτωμένη (Luke 1:28), the Greek word Origen discusses. The words “of his teaching” in Ps 19:4 are an expansion in this text. A phrase in the reasoning about old age (“quae vel cur® corporis et senectae”) is damaged in the digital text and translated by sense.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (Migne’s conjecture note leaked into the text; OCR; OCR (Cyrillic and micro-sign look-alikes; split word); OCR (split word); footnote letter; split word): [F. erubescebat] → ; ct abscondebat → et abscondebat; parius ingrueret → partus ingrueret; martyris b epistola → martyris epistola; in· ter perfectos → inter perfectos; impedi(??)ur → impeditur; quod a Graece → quod Graece; хεχαрιτω- µένη → κεχαριτωμένη; quo- (??)idiana → quotidiana; Propter qnod → Propter quod; Jesus, b qui → Jesus, qui; cum bis est → cum his est; qul sub sole → qui sub sole; coetul → coetui.
Extrabiblical texts: Ign. Eph. 19.1 (To the Ephesians; quotation)
Topics: Christology, Marriage
Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Luc. 6 (PL 26:230a–232d; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-lucam/6/#p-6). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-lucam-6) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Jerome's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PL 26; digital text of the Open Greek and Latin project); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
Chapter 7
7PL 26:232d–235a
De eo quod scriptum est: Exsurgens autem Maria cum festinatione venit in montana, usque ad eum locum ubi ait(??) Erit consummatio eorum quoe dicta sunt. Cap. I. Meliores ad deteriores veniunt, ut eis ex adventu suo aliquid tribuant emolumenti. Sic et Salvator venit ad Joannem, ut sanctificaret baptisma illius: et Maria statim ut audivit angelum nuntiantem, quod conceperit Salvatorem, et quod cognata illius Elizabeth haberet in utero, consurgens cum festinatione venit in montana, et ingressa est domum Elizabeth. Jesus vero, qui in utero illius erat, festinabat adhuc in ventre matris Joannem positum sanctificare. Denique antequam veniret Maria, et salutaret Elizabeth, non exsultavit infans in utero: sed statim ut Maria locuta est verbum, quod Filius Dei in ventre matris suggesserat, exsultavit infans in gaudio, et tunc primum praecursorem suum prophetam fecit Jesus. Oportebat quoque Mariam cum Dei prole dignissima, post alloquium Dei, ad montana conscendere, et in sublimioribus commorari. Unde et scriptum est: Consurgens Maria in diebus illis, venit in montana. Debuerat etiam, cum esset sollicita, non pigra, properare sollicitudine, et Spiritu sancto plena ad sublimiora perduci, et virtute Dei protegi, a qua fuerat obumbrata. Venit ergo in civitatem Judae, et in domum Zachariae, et salutavit Elizabeth, Factum est cum audisset salutationem Mariae Elizabeth, exsultavit infans in utero ejus, et repleta est Spiritu sancto. Non est itaque dubium quin quae tunc repleta est Spiritu sancto, propter filium sit repleta. Neque enim mater primum Spiritum sanctum meruit, sed cum Joannes adhuc clausus in utero Spiritum sanctum recepisset, tunc et illa post sanctificationem filii repleta est Spiritu sancto. Poteris hoc credere, si simile quid etiam de Salvatore cognoveris. Invenitur beata Maria, sicut in aliquantis exemplaribus reperimus, prophetare. Non enim ignoramus, quod secundum alios codices et haec verba Elizabeth vaticinetur. Spiritu itaque sancto tunc repleta est Maria, quando coepit in utero habere Salvatorem. Statim enim ut Spiritum sanctum accepit, Dominici corporis conditorem, et Filius Dei esse coepit in utero, etiam ipsa completa est Spiritu sancto. Exsultavit ergo infans in utero Elizabeth, et repleta est Spiritu sancto, et clamavit voce magna et dixit: Benedicta tu inter mulieres. Debemus in hoc loco, ne simplices quique decipiantur, ea quae solent opponere haeretici, confutare. In tantam quippe nescio quis prorupit insaniam, ut assereret negatam fuisse Mariam a Salvatore, eo quod post nativitatem illius juncta fuerit Joseph: et loculus est, quae quali mente dixerit ipse noverit qui loculus est: Si quando igitur haeretici vobis tale quid objecerint, respondete eis, et dicite: Certe Spiritu sancto plena Elizabeth ait: Benedicta tu inter mulieres. Si sancto Spiritu benedicta canitur Maria, quomodo eam Salvator negavit? Porro quod asserunt eam nupsisse post parium, unde approbent non habent. Hi enim filii, qui Joseph dicebantur, non erant orti de Maria, neque est ulla Scriptura quae ista commemoret. Benedicta tu inter mulieres, et benedictus fructus ventris tui. Et unde mihi hoc, ut veniat Mater Domini mei ad me? Quod ait: Unde mihi hoc, non ignorans dicit: et maxime Spiritu sancto plena, quasi nesciat quod juxta Dei voluntatem Mater Domini venerit ad eam; sed isto sensu loquitur; Quid boni feci? quae opera mea tanta sunt, ut Mater Domini ad me veniat? per quam justitiam, ex quibus bonis, de qua fidelitate mentis hoc merui, ut Mater Domini mei veniat ad me? Ecce enim ut facta est salutatio tua in aures meas, exsultavit in exsultatione infans in utero meo. Sancta erat anima beati Joannis, et adhuc in matris utero clausa, venturaque in mundum, quasi per experientiae sensum, sciebat quae Israel ignorabat. Unde exsilivit: et non simpliciter exsilivit, sed in gaudio. Senserat enim venisse Dominum suum, ut sanctificaret servum suum, antequam de matris utero procederet. Utinam mihi eveniat, ut ab infidelibus stultus dicar, qui talibus credidi. Ipsum opus ostendit et veritas, non me stultitiae, sed sapientiae credidisse: et quia hoc quod stultum apud illos putatur, mihi salutis occasio sil. Nisi enim fuisset coelestis, et beata nativitas Salvatoris, nisi habuisset divini aliquid, et humanitatem hominum superegrediens, numquam totum orbem illius doctrina penetrasset. Si tantummodo fuisset in Mariae utero, et non Dei Filius, quomodo poterat fieri, ut et illo tempore et nunc, non solum corporum, sed etiam animarum morbi multiplices curarentur? Quis nostrum non insipiens fuit, qui nunc propter misericordiam Dei habemus intelligentiam, et sitimus Deum? Quis nostrum non incredulus justitiae, qui nunc propter Christum justitiam habemus, sequimurque justitiam? Quis nostrum non errabundus et vagus, qui nunc propter adventum Salvatoris non fluctuamus, atque turbamur, sed sumus in via, in illo videlicet qui ait: Ego sum via (Joan. x)? Possumus et reliqua congregantes videre, quoniam omnia quae scripta sunt de eo, divina admiratione digna referuntur: quod et nativitas illius, et nutrimento, et virtus, et passio, et resurrectio non solum illo tempore, sed etiam nunc operentur in nobis. Quis vos, o catechumeni, in Ecclesia congregavit? qui stimulus impulit, ut, relictis domibus, in hunc coetum coeatis? Neque enim nos domus vestros singillatim circuivimus; sed omnipotens Pater virtute invisibili subjicit cordibus vestris, quos scit esse dignos, hunc ardorem, ut quasi inviti, et retrectantes venialis ad fidem, maxime in exordio religionis, cum veluti trepidi et paventes salutis fidem cum timore suscipitis. Obsecro vos, o catechumeni, nolite retrectare: nemo vestrum formidet et paveat, sed sequimini praeeuntem Jesum. Ille vos trahit ad salutem, congregat in Ecclesiam nunc quidem super terram: si autem dignos fructus feceritis, in Ecclesiam primitivorum qui scripti sunt in coelestibus. Beata quoe credidit, quia erit perfectio his quoe dicta sunt ei a Domino. Super quibus et beata Maria magnificat Dominum Jesum. Magnificat autem anima Dominum, spiritus Deum. Quae quam habeant interpretationem, si concesserit Dominus, ut rursus In Ecclesiam congregemur, ut festivi venialis ad domum Dei, et divinae lectioni praebeatis aures, quaeremus, ventilabimus, disseremus, in Christo Jesu, cui est gloria et imperium in saecula saeculorum. Amen.
On the text: “Mary arose and went with haste into the hill country,” up to the place where he says, “There will be a fulfilment of the things spoken.” Chapter 1. The better come to the worse, so that by their coming they may bestow some benefit on them. So the Saviour came to John, to sanctify his baptism; and Mary, as soon as she heard the angel announce that she had conceived the Saviour and that her kinswoman Elizabeth was with child, arose with haste and went into the hill country and entered the house of Elizabeth. And Jesus, who was in her womb, was hastening to sanctify John, who was still in his mother’s womb. Indeed, before Mary came and greeted Elizabeth, the infant did not leap in the womb; but as soon as Mary spoke the word which the Son of God in his mother’s womb had prompted, the infant leaped for joy, and then for the first time Jesus made his forerunner a prophet. It was fitting too that Mary, with the most worthy offspring of God, after God had spoken with her, should go up into the hill country and dwell in the higher places. Hence it is written: “Mary arose in those days and went into the hill country.” She ought also, being diligent and not slothful, to hasten with diligence and, filled with the Holy Spirit, to be led to higher places and to be protected by the power of God, by which she had been overshadowed. She came, then, to a city of Judah, into the house of Zechariah, and greeted Elizabeth. “And it came to pass, when Elizabeth heard Mary’s greeting, the infant leaped in her womb, and she was filled with the Holy Spirit.” There is no doubt, then, that she who was then filled with the Holy Spirit was filled because of her son. For the mother did not first deserve the Holy Spirit; but when John, still shut up in the womb, had received the Holy Spirit, then she too, after the sanctification of her son, was filled with the Holy Spirit. You will be able to believe this if you learn something similar about the Saviour too. Blessed Mary is found prophesying, as we find in some copies; for we are not unaware that according to other manuscripts these words too are prophesied by Elizabeth. Mary, then, was filled with the Holy Spirit when she began to have the Saviour in her womb. For as soon as she received the Holy Spirit, the maker of the Lord’s body, and the Son of God began to be in her womb, she too was filled with the Holy Spirit. “The infant, then, leaped in Elizabeth’s womb, and she was filled with the Holy Spirit, and cried out with a loud voice and said: Blessed are you among women.” At this point, so that simple people may not be deceived, we must refute what the heretics usually object. For someone, I do not know who, burst into such madness as to assert that Mary was denied by the Saviour because after his birth she was joined to Joseph; and he said it (with what mind, he who said it knows). If, then, heretics ever object something of this kind to you, answer them and say: Surely Elizabeth, filled with the Holy Spirit, says, “Blessed are you among women.” If Mary is proclaimed blessed by the Holy Spirit, how did the Saviour deny her? Moreover, as for their assertion that she married after giving birth, they have nothing from which to prove it. For those sons who were called Joseph’s were not born of Mary, nor is there any Scripture that records such things. “Blessed are you among women, and blessed is the fruit of your womb. And how does this come to me, that the Mother of my Lord should come to me?” When she says, “How does this come to me?” she does not speak in ignorance, especially being filled with the Holy Spirit, as though she did not know that the Mother of the Lord had come to her according to God’s will; she speaks in this sense: What good have I done? What works of mine are so great that the Mother of the Lord should come to me? By what righteousness, by what good deeds, by what faithfulness of mind have I deserved this, that the Mother of my Lord should come to me? “For behold, as soon as your greeting came to my ears, the infant in my womb leaped with exultation.” The soul of blessed John was holy, and though still shut up in his mother’s womb and yet to come into the world, he knew, as if by the sense of experience, what Israel did not know. So he leaped; and not simply leaped, but leaped for joy. For he had perceived that his Lord had come to sanctify his servant before he came forth from his mother’s womb. Would that it might befall me to be called a fool by unbelievers for having believed such things! The deed itself and the truth show that I have believed not folly but wisdom, and that what is thought foolish among them is an occasion of salvation for me. For unless the birth of the Saviour had been heavenly and blessed, unless it had had something divine, surpassing humanity, his teaching would never have penetrated the whole world. If he had only been in Mary’s womb and had not been the Son of God, how could it have happened, both at that time and now, that manifold diseases not only of bodies but also of souls should be cured? Which of us was not foolish, we who now, through the mercy of God, have understanding and thirst for God? Which of us was not without faith in righteousness, we who now through Christ have righteousness and pursue righteousness? Which of us was not wandering and astray, we who now, because of the coming of the Saviour, are not tossed about and troubled, but are on the way, namely in him who said, “I am the way” (John 14:6)? We can gather the rest too and see that everything written of him is recorded as worthy of divine wonder: his birth, his upbringing, his power, his passion, and his resurrection work in us not only at that time but now as well. Who gathered you, catechumens, into the church? What spur drove you to leave your homes and come together in this assembly? For we did not go round your houses one by one; but the almighty Father by invisible power puts this ardour into the hearts of those he knows to be worthy, so that you come to the faith as if unwilling and reluctant, especially at the beginning of your religion, when you receive the faith of salvation with fear, as if trembling and afraid. I beseech you, catechumens, do not draw back: let none of you be fearful and afraid, but follow Jesus, who goes before you. He draws you to salvation; he gathers you into the church, now indeed upon earth, but, if you bring forth worthy fruits, into the church of the firstborn who are enrolled in heaven. “Blessed is she who believed, for there will be a fulfilment of the things spoken to her by the Lord.” For these things blessed Mary too magnifies the Lord Jesus. The soul magnifies the Lord, the spirit God. What interpretation these words have we shall seek, sift, and discuss, if the Lord grants that we gather again in the church, so that you may come festively to the house of God and lend your ears to the divine reading, in Christ Jesus, to whom be glory and dominion for ever and ever. Amen.
Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.
Luke 1:39 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 1:40 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 1:41 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 1:42 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 1:43 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 1:44 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 1:45 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 1:46 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 1:47 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 1:35 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 3:13 (allusion, medium confidence) · Matt 13:55 (allusion, medium confidence) · John 14:6 (quotation, high confidence) · Heb 12:23 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 3:8 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: At Mary’s visit the unborn Christ sanctifies John and fills Elizabeth with the Spirit; Origen rejects the claim that Mary married Joseph after Jesus’ birth and urges the catechumens to persevere.
- Origen (in Jerome’s Latin) holds that Mary did not marry after Jesus’ birth and that the brothers called Joseph’s sons were not Mary’s (cf. Matt 13:55); the heretic he answers is unnamed. The remark on copies refers to the Magnificat (Luke 1:46), which some manuscripts give to Elizabeth; this is the text’s own report. The Holy Spirit is called “the maker of the Lord’s body” (Dominici corporis conditorem).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR; column numbers leaked into the text; footnote letter; split word): statini → statim; ad(??)uc → adhuc; Ma· ria → Maria; locu(??)a → locuta; F(??)lins → Filius; ma(??)ris → matris; reple(??)a → repleta; aliquantis a exemplaribus → aliquantis exemplaribus; fuerit b Joseph → fuerit Joseph; non babent → non habent; s(??)lutatio → salutatio; exsul(??)atione → exsultatione; ex(??)ilivit → exsilivit; boc quod → hoc quod; Immanitatem → humanitatem; et non 267 268 Dei → et non Dei; c(??)ngregantes → congregantes; omnip(??)tens → omnipotens; Ecclesiamt → Ecclesiam.
Topics: Christology, Heresy
Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Luc. 7 (PL 26:232d–235a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-lucam/6/#p-7). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-lucam-7) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Jerome's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PL 26; digital text of the Open Greek and Latin project); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
Chapter 8
8PL 26:235b–237a
De eo quod scriptum est; Magnificat anima mea Dominum, usque ad illum locum ubi ait; Timentibus efficit virtutem. Cap. I. Ante Joannem prophetat Elizabeth, ante ortum Domini Salvatoris prophetat Maria. Et quomodo peccatum coepit a muliere, et deinceps ad virum usque pervenit: sic et principium salutis a mulieribus habuit exordium, ut caeterae quoque mulieres, sexus fragilitate deposita, imitarentur vitam, conversationemque sanctarum earum, quae vel maxime nunc in Evangelio describuntur. Videamus ergo vaticinium virginale. Magnificat, ait, anima mea Dominum, et exsultavit spiritus meus in Deo salutari meo. Duae res, anima scilicet et spiritus, duplici laude funguntur. Anima Dominum praedicat, spiritus Deum. Non quod alia laus Domini, alia Dei sit; sed quia qui Deus est, idem et Dominus est: et qui Dominus est, idem et Deus sit. Quaeritur quomodo magnificet Dominum. Si enim Dominus nec augmentum, nec decrementum, recipere potest, et quod est, est: qua ratione nunc Maria loquitur: Magnificat anima mea Dominum? Si considerem Dominum Salvatorem imaginem esse invisibilis Dei (Coloss. i), et videam animam meam factam ad imaginem conditoris, ut imago esset imaginis, neque enim anima mea specialiter imago est Dei; sed ad similitudinem imaginis prioris effecta est: tunc videbo quoniam in exemplum eorum, qui solent imagines pingere, et uno (verbi causa) vultu regis accepto ad principalem similitudinem exprimendam artis industriam commendare, unusquisque nostrum ad imaginem Christi formans animam suam, aut majorem ei, aut minorem ponit imaginem, vel obsoletam, vel sordidam, aut claram, atque lucentem, et splendentem ad effigiem imaginis principalis. Quando igitur grandem fecero imaginem imaginis, id est, animam meam, et magnificavero eam opere, cogitatione, sermone, tunc imago Dei grandis efficitur, et ipse Dominus, cujus imago est in nostra anima, magnificatur. Et quomodo crescit Dominus in nostra imagine, sic si peccatores fuerimus, minuitur atque decrescit. Sed nos pro imagine Salvatoris alias nobis imagines induimus: pro imagine Verbi sapientiae, justitiae, caeterarumque virtutum, diaboli formam assumimus, ut dicatur de nobis: Serpentes, generatio viperarum (Matth. xxiii). Et leonis personam induimus, et draconis, et vulpium, quando venenati, crudeles, callidi sumus; necnon et hirci, vel porci, quando ad libidinem promptiores. Memini quondam Deuteronomium disserentem in eo loco ubi scriptum Est: Ne faciatis omnem similitudinem omnis animalis (Deut. iv), dixisse me quoniam spiritalis est in alios facere imaginem masculi, in alios feminae: illum similitudinem habere volucrum, illum reptilium, atque serpentium, et alium facere similitudinem Dei. Haec quomodo intelligantur sciet qui illa legerit. Anima itaque Mariae primum magnificat Dominum, et postea exsultat in Deo. Nisi enim antea crederemus, exsultare non possemus. Quia respexit, inquit, in humilitatem ancillae suae. In quam humilitatem Mariae respexit Dominus? Quid habebat Mater Salvatoris humile atque dejectum, quae Dei Filium gestabat in utero? Quod ergo dicit: Respexit in humilitatem ancillae suae, tale est quasi dixerit: Respexit in justitiam ancillae suae, respexit in temperantiam, respexit in fortitudinem atque sapientiam. Dignum quippe est, ut virtutes respiciat. Respondeat aliquis, et dicat: Intelligo quomodo Deus justitiam ancillae suae, sapientiamque respiciat: quomodo autem intendat humilitatem, non satis liquet. Consideret qui quaerit talia, quoniam proprie in Scripturis una de virtutibus humilitas praedicetur. Ait quippe Salvator: Discite a me quia mansuetus sum, et humilis corde, et invenietis requiem animabus vestris (Matth. xi). Quod si vis nomen hujus audire virtutis, quomodo etiam a philosophis appellatur, ausculta eamdem esse humilitatem quam respiciat Deus, quae ab illis ά(??)νφία, sive μ(??)ρɩό(??) dicitur. Sed et nos quodam eam possumus appellare circuitu, cum aliquis non est inflatus, sed ipse se dejicit. Qui enim inflatur, cadit, secundum Apostolum, in judicium diaboli: siquidem et ille ab inflatione coepit atque superbia. Ut non, inquit, inflatus in judicium incidat diaboli (I Tim. iii). Respexit super humilitatem ancillae suae. Humilem me, inquit, et mansuetudinis sectantem dejectionisque virtutem respexit Deus. Ecce enim amodo beatam me dicunt omnes generationes. Si simpliciter intelligam omnes generationes, super credentibus illud interpretor. Si autem altius aliquid fuero scrutatus, animadvertam quanti profectus sit dicere: Quia fecit mihi magna qui est potens: quoniam omnia qui se humiliat exaltabitur (Luc. xviii). Respexit autem Deus in humilitatem beatae Mariae, propterea fecit illi magna qui potens est, et sanctum nomen ejus. Et misericordia ejus in generationes generationum. Misericordia Dei non in unam generationem, nec in duas, neque in tres, sed nec in quinque, verum in sempiternum extenditur in generationes generationum, timentibus potentiam ejus. Fecit virtutem in brachio suo. Licet infirmus ad Dominum accesseris, si timueris eum, audire poteris repromissionem quam tibi ob timorem tuum Dominus pollicetur. Quae est ista repromissio? Timentibus, inquit, se fecit virtutem. Virtus, sive imperium, potestas est regia. Etenim κράτος quod nos imperium possumus appellare, ab eo dicitur quod sive sub se universa contineat. Si ergo timueris Dominum, dat tibi fortitudinem, sive imperium, dat regnum, ut factus sub Rege regum, possideas regnum coelorum, in Christo Jesu, cui est gloria et imperium in saecula saeculorum. Amen.
On the text: “My soul magnifies the Lord,” up to the place where he says, “He shows strength to those who fear him.” Chapter 1. Elizabeth prophesies before John; Mary prophesies before the birth of the Lord Saviour. And just as sin began from a woman and then reached the man, so also salvation had its beginning from women, so that the rest of women too, laying aside the frailty of their sex, might imitate the life and conduct of those holy women who are described above all now in the Gospel. Let us look, then, at the virgin’s prophecy. “My soul,” she says, “magnifies the Lord, and my spirit has rejoiced in God my Saviour.” Two things, the soul and the spirit, perform a twofold praise. The soul proclaims the Lord, the spirit God; not that the praise of the Lord is one thing and the praise of God another, but because he who is God is also Lord, and he who is Lord is also God. It is asked how she magnifies the Lord. For if the Lord can receive neither increase nor decrease, and is what he is, in what sense does Mary now say, “My soul magnifies the Lord”? If I consider that the Lord Saviour is the image of the invisible God (Col 1:15), and see that my soul was made after the image of the Creator, so as to be an image of the image (for my soul is not itself, properly speaking, the image of God, but was made after the likeness of the prior image), then I shall see this. Like those who paint portraits and, taking for instance a single face of a king, apply the skill of their art to expressing the original likeness, each of us, forming his soul after the image of Christ, makes of it a greater or lesser image, either faded and dirty or clear and shining, bright with the likeness of the original image. When, therefore, I make the image of the image, that is, my soul, great, and magnify it in deed, thought, and word, then the image of God is made great, and the Lord himself, whose image is in our soul, is magnified. And as the Lord grows in our image, so, if we are sinners, he is diminished and decreases. But instead of the image of the Saviour we put on other images: instead of the image of the Word, of wisdom, of righteousness, and of the other virtues, we take on the form of the devil, so that it is said of us, “Serpents, brood of vipers” (Matt 23:33). We put on the mask of a lion, of a dragon, and of foxes, when we are venomous, cruel, and cunning; and also of a goat or a pig, when we are more prone to lust. I remember that once, when I was discussing Deuteronomy at the place where it is written, “You shall not make any likeness of any animal” (Deut 4:16–17), I said that, since the law is spiritual, some make in themselves the image of a male, others of a female; one has the likeness of birds, another of reptiles and serpents, and another makes the likeness of God. How this is to be understood, whoever reads that discussion will know. Mary’s soul, then, first magnifies the Lord and afterwards rejoices in God. For unless we first believed, we could not rejoice. “For he has looked upon the lowliness of his handmaid.” What lowliness of Mary did the Lord look upon? What did the Mother of the Saviour have that was lowly and abject, she who carried the Son of God in her womb? What she says, then, “He has looked upon the lowliness of his handmaid,” is as if she had said: He has looked upon the righteousness of his handmaid, he has looked upon her temperance, he has looked upon her fortitude and wisdom. For it is fitting that he should look upon virtues. Someone may reply and say: I understand how God looks upon the righteousness and wisdom of his handmaid; but how he regards lowliness is not clear enough. Let one who asks such things consider that in the Scriptures humility is proclaimed specifically as one of the virtues. For the Saviour says: “Learn from me, for I am gentle and lowly in heart, and you will find rest for your souls” (Matt 11:29). And if you want to hear the name of this virtue as the philosophers too call it, listen: the humility which God regards is the same as what they call ἀτυφία or μετριότης. We too can name it by a kind of circumlocution: when someone is not puffed up but humbles himself. For one who is puffed up falls, according to the apostle, into the judgment of the devil; for the devil too began from being puffed up and from pride. “Lest,” he says, “being puffed up he fall into the judgment of the devil” (1 Tim 3:6). “He has looked upon the lowliness of his handmaid”: God has looked upon me, she says, lowly and pursuing the virtue of gentleness and self-abasement. “For behold, from now on all generations will call me blessed.” If I understand “all generations” simply, I interpret it of believers. But if I search out something deeper, I shall notice how much it profits to say, “For he who is mighty has done great things for me,” since everyone who humbles himself will be exalted (Luke 18:14). God looked upon the lowliness of blessed Mary; therefore he who is mighty has done great things for her, “and holy is his name. And his mercy is from generation to generation.” The mercy of God extends not to one generation, nor two, nor three, nor even five, but for ever, from generation to generation, to those who fear his power. “He has shown strength with his arm.” Though you come to the Lord weak, if you fear him, you will be able to hear the promise which the Lord makes to you because of your fear. What is this promise? “To those who fear him,” it says, “he has shown strength.” Strength, or sovereignty, is royal power. For κράτος, which we can call imperium, is so called because it holds all things under itself. If, then, you fear the Lord, he gives you strength, or sovereignty; he gives you a kingdom, so that, made subject to the King of kings, you may possess the kingdom of heaven, in Christ Jesus, to whom be glory and dominion for ever and ever. Amen.
Luke 1:46 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 1:47 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 1:48 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 1:49 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 1:50 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 1:51 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 3:6 (allusion, medium confidence) · Col 1:15 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 1:26 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 23:33 (quotation, high confidence) · Deut 4:16 (quotation, high confidence) · Deut 4:17 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 7:14 (allusion, medium confidence) · Matt 11:29 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Tim 3:6 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 18:14 (allusion, high confidence) · Rev 19:16 (allusion, low confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Mary magnifies the Lord by making her soul, the image of Christ who is God’s image, great; the “lowliness” God regarded is the virtue of humility.
- The Greek philosophical terms are damaged in the digital text (“ά(??)νφία, sive μ(??)ρɩό(??)”) and are read as ἀτυφία (“freedom from conceit”) and μετριότης (“moderation”), by sense. The discussion of Deuteronomy that Origen recalls is lost. “Strength” and “sovereignty” render virtus and imperium for Greek κράτος (Luke 1:51).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR; OCR (Latin x for kappa) and footnote letter; footnote letter; joined words; split word): conversatio nemque → conversationemque; Do· minum → Dominum; tormans → formans; iu alios feminae → in alios feminae; a(??)que serpentium → atque serpentium; illa a legerit → illa legerit; Maior Salvatoris → Mater Salvatoris; tale esi quasi → tale est quasi; quippo → quippe; Discite ame → Discite a me; quinquo → quinque; xρά(??)οϛ a quod → κράτος quod; dai regnum → dat regnum; eui est → cui est.
Topics: Ethics
Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Luc. 8 (PL 26:235b–237a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-lucam/6/#p-8). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-lucam-8) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Jerome's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PL 26; digital text of the Open Greek and Latin project); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
Chapter 9
9PL 26:237b–238b
De eo quod scriptum est: Manebat cum ea mensibus tribus, usque ad eum locum ubi ait: Et loquebatur benedicens Dominum. Cap. I. Tam eorum quae dicta sunt, quam illorum quae facta referuntur, debet ratio esse sancto Spiritu digna, et Christi fide, ad quam credentes vocamur. Unde et nunc causa quaerenda est, quare Maria post conceptum venerit ad Elizabeth, et manserit cum ea mensibus tribus, aut quid causae fuerit, ut Lucas, qui Evangelii scribebat historiam, etiam hoc scriberet, quod manserit cum ea mensibus tribus, et postea regressa sit in domum suam. Utique debet aliqua esse ratio, quam si Dominus aperuerit cor nostrum, sequens sermo monstrabit. Si enim eo quod tantum venit Maria ad Elizabeth, et salutavit eum, exsultavit infans in gaudio, et Spiritu sancto plena Elizabeth prophetavit ea quae in Evangelio scripta sunt, et in una hora tantos profectus habuit, nostrae conjecturae relinquitur, quid in tribus mensibus Joannes profecit, assistente Maria Elizabeth. Valde quippe indignum est in puncto horae atque momento exsultare infantem, et quodammodo gaudio lascivisse, repletamque esse Spiritu sancto Elizabeth: per tres vere men(??)·, nec Joannem, nec Elizabeth, ex vicina Matris Domini et ipsius Salvatoris praesentia profecisse. Exercebatur ergo, et quodammodo in athletico sancta matre, per tres menses urgebatur Joannes, et praeparabatur in matris utero, ut mirabiliter natus, mirabilius nutriretur. Quod enim extra consuetudinem nutritus est, non refertur scriptum, quomodo matris fuerit lactatus uberibus, quomodo in sinu gerulae constitutus, sed statim sequitur: Et erat in desertis, usque ad diem ostensionis suae ad Israel. Deinde legimus: Elizabeth autem completum est tempus ut pareret, et peperit filium. Multi putant superflue dici: Elizabeth autem completum est tempus ut pareret, et peperit filium (Marc. i). Quae enim mulier potest parere, nisi tempus patiendi ante compleverit? Sed qui Scripturas diligentissime contemplatur, et audit populum loquentem, attendat lectioni, observans tam in veteri, quam in novo Testamento, sicubi scriptum in ortu peccatoris inveniat: Completum est tempus ut pareret, numquam omnino reperiet. Sed ubicumque justus nascitur, ibi completur dies, illic in mundum completur adventus sui. Ortus justi, plenitudinem habet: peccatoris nativitas, ut ita dicamus, vacuitatem atque inanitatem. Haec de eo quod scriptum est: Completum est tempus ut pareret. Congratulabantur matri ejus vicini, et cognati, et volebant in honorem patris puero nomen ponere, ut vocaretur Zacharias. Porro Elizabeth, sancto Spiritu suggerente, aiebat: Joannes est nomen ejus. Deinde cum illi causas justas quaererent cur Joannes potissimum vocaretur, cum in genere ipsius nullus haberet hoc nomen, interrogant patrem, qui non valens respondere (manu et litteris est locutus). Scripsit enim in pugillari, Joannes est nomen ejus: statimque ut stylus impressus est cerae, lingua, quae prius fuerat vincta, laxata est. Recepit eloquium, non humanum, quoniam ligata fuit lingua ejus; humana tamen non fuit. Vinxerat enim eam incredulitas. Statim ut soluta est, humana esse desinit, et loquebatur benedicens Deum, et prophetavit ea quae scripta sunt in Evangelio, de quibus, praebente Domino Jesu Christo, cum tempus fuerit, disseremus: cui est gloria et imperium in saecula saeculorum. Amen.
On the text: “She remained with her three months,” up to the place where he says, “And he spoke, blessing the Lord.” Chapter 1. The reason both for what is said and for what is recorded as done must be worthy of the Holy Spirit and of the faith of Christ, to which we believers are called. So now too we must seek the cause why Mary, after conceiving, came to Elizabeth and remained with her three months, or what reason Luke, who was writing the history of the Gospel, had for writing this too, that she remained with her three months and afterwards returned to her home. Surely there must be some reason, which the following discourse will show, if the Lord opens our heart. For if, merely because Mary came to Elizabeth and greeted her, the infant leaped for joy, and Elizabeth, filled with the Holy Spirit, prophesied what is written in the Gospel and in one hour made such progress, it is left to our conjecture how much John progressed in three months while Mary stayed with Elizabeth. For it would be quite unfitting that in a single moment of an hour the infant leaped and, as it were, frolicked for joy, and Elizabeth was filled with the Holy Spirit, but that over three months neither John nor Elizabeth progressed from the close presence of the Mother of the Lord and of the Saviour himself. John, then, was being trained; as if in the athletic school of his holy mother he was exercised for three months and prepared in his mother’s womb, so that, born wonderfully, he might be nourished more wonderfully still. For since he was nourished beyond the usual way, nothing is written of how he was suckled at his mother’s breasts or held in a nurse’s lap; at once there follows: “And he was in the deserts until the day of his manifestation to Israel.” Then we read: “Now the time was fulfilled for Elizabeth to give birth, and she bore a son.” Many think it superfluous to say, “Now the time was fulfilled for Elizabeth to give birth, and she bore a son.” For what woman can give birth unless she has first completed the time of bearing? But let one who contemplates the Scriptures most carefully, and hears the people speaking, attend to the reading and observe whether, in the Old or the New Testament, he finds written at the birth of a sinner, “The time was fulfilled for her to give birth”: he will never find it at all. But wherever a righteous man is born, there the days are fulfilled; there the fulness of his coming into the world is completed. The birth of a righteous man has fulness; the birth of a sinner has, so to speak, emptiness and void. So much for the words, “The time was fulfilled for her to give birth.” “Her neighbours and kinsfolk rejoiced with his mother,” and wanted to give the child a name in honour of his father, so that he would be called Zechariah. But Elizabeth, at the prompting of the Holy Spirit, said, “John is his name.” Then, when they sought good reasons why he should be called John in particular, since no one in his family had this name, they asked the father, who, unable to answer, spoke by hand and letters. For he wrote on a tablet, “John is his name”; and as soon as the stylus was pressed into the wax, his tongue, which had been bound before, was loosed. He recovered speech, but not merely human speech: his tongue had been bound, yet not by a human bond, for unbelief had bound it. As soon as it was loosed, it ceased to be merely human, and he spoke, blessing God, and prophesied what is written in the Gospel, which, the Lord Jesus Christ granting it, we shall discuss when the time comes; to him be glory and dominion for ever and ever. Amen.
Luke 1:56 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 1:41 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 1:80 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 1:57 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 1:58 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 1:59 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 1:60 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 1:63 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 1:64 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 1:20 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Mary’s three-month stay trained the unborn John; Scripture speaks of a “fulfilled time” only at the births of the righteous; and Zechariah’s tongue, bound by unbelief, was loosed to prophesy.
- The sentences on Zechariah’s recovered speech (“Recepit eloquium, non humanum … humana esse desinit”) are compressed in the Latin and translated by sense. Migne’s marginal reference “Marc. i” is to Luke 1:57.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR): exsultaro → exsultare; na(??)u(??) → natus; tempus mt pareret → tempus ut pareret; contemptatur → contemplatur; loq(??)e(??)tem → loquentem; in o(??)u peccatoris → in ortu peccatoris; plenitudinem babet → plenitudinem habet; el cognati → et cognati.
Cite (SBL): Origen, Hom. Luc. 9 (PL 26:237b–238b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-homiliae-lucam/6/#p-9). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-origen-homiliae-lucam-9) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Jerome's Latin translation of Origen's lost Greek (Migne PL 26; digital text of the Open Greek and Latin project); no public-domain English translation exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.