Sermons to the People 140.1–141.4

Latin text: PL 38 (Latin text: Migne, PL 38, digitized by Open Greek and Latin (patrologia_latina-dev, University of Leipzig), CC BY-SA 4.0).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0). Compare: NPNF 1/6: Sermons on Selected Lessons of the New Testament (R. G. MacMullen, ed., 1888).

Show

Chapter 140

140.1PL 38:463

Quid est quod audivimus, fratres, dicentem Dominum, Qui credit in me, non credit in me, sed in eum qui me misit? Bonum est nohis credere in Christum; maxime quia it se aperte etiam dixit istud quod audistis, hoc est, quoniam ipse lux venerat in mundum, et qui credit in eum, non ambulabit in tenebris, sed habebit lumen vitæ. Bonum est ergo credere in Christum. Magnum bonum est credere in Christum: ct magnum malum est non credere in Christum. Sed quia Christus Filius de Patre est quidquid est, Pater autem non est de Filio, sed Pater cst Filii; commendat quidem in se fidem, sed honorem revocat ad auctorem.

What is it, brothers, that we have heard the Lord saying, “He who believes in me does not believe in me, but in him who sent me”? It is good for us to believe in Christ; especially since he himself also said openly what you have heard, that he had come as light into the world, and whoever believes in him will not walk in darkness but will have the light of life. So it is good to believe in Christ. It is a great good to believe in Christ, and a great evil not to believe in Christ. But since Christ the Son is from the Father whatever he is, while the Father is not from the Son but is the Father of the Son, he commends faith in himself, but refers the honor back to its source.

John 12:44 (quotation, high confidence) · John 12:46 (allusion, high confidence) · John 8:12 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Faith in Christ is a great good; but since the Son is from the Father, he commends faith in himself while referring the honor to the Father.

  • Migne’s title says the sermon answers a saying of Maximinus, an Arian bishop who came to Africa with Count Segisvult (around 427). Quotations and allusions: John 12:44, 46; John 8:12.

Topics: Trinity

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 140.1 (PL 38:463; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/140-1/#p-140-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-140-1) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).

140.2PL 38:463

Hoc enim firmum et fixum tenete, si vultis perseverare catholici, quia Deus Pater Dcum Filium genuit sine tempore, et fecit ex Virgine in tempore. Nativitas illa excedit tempora: nativitas ista illuminat tempora. Ambas tamen nativitates mirabiles: illa sine matre, ista sine patre. Quando genuit Deus Filium, de se genuit, non de matre: quando genuit mater filium, virgo genuit, non de viro. De Patre natus est sine initio: de matre natus est hodie certo initio. De Patre natus fecit nos: de matre natus refecit nos. De Patre natus cst, ut essemus: de matre natus est, ne periremus. Genuit autem Pater æqualem sibi, et totum quidquid est Filius, habet de Patre. Quod autem Deus Patcr est, non habet de Filio. Itaque dicimus Patrem Dcum de nullo, Filium Dcum de Dco. Propterca omne quod Filius facit mirabiliter, omne quod dicit veraciter, ei tribuit de quo est; nec esse potest aliud, quam ille de quo est. Adam factus est homo: potuit esse aliud, quam est factus. Factus est enim justus, et potuit esse injustus. Unigenitus autem Dci Filius, quod cst, hoc mutari non potest: in aliud converti non potest, minui non potest, quod erat non esse non potest, non esse Patri æqualis non potest. Sed plane ille, qui omnia Filio dedit nascenti, dedit non indigenti; sinc dubio et ipsam æqualitatem cum Patre Pater dcdit Filio. Quomodo Pater dedit? numquid minorem genuit, et addidit illi ad formam, ut faceret aqualem? Si hoc fecisset, indigenti dedisset. Jam vero dixi vobis, quod firmissime tenere debetis, id est, totum quod est Filius Pater dedit, sed nascenti, non indigenti. Si nascenti dedit, non indigenti, et æqualitatem sine dubio dedit, et æqualitatem dando æqualem genuit. Et licet alius sit ille, alius iste; non tamen aliud est ille, aliud istc: sed quod ille, hoc et iste. Non qui ille, hic et iste: sed quod ille, hoc ct iste.

Hold this firmly and fixedly, if you want to remain Catholics: that God the Father begot God the Son without time, and made him of a virgin in time. That birth exceeds times; this birth illuminates times. Yet both births are wonderful: that one without a mother, this one without a father. When God begot the Son, he begot him of himself, not of a mother; when the mother bore the son, she bore him as a virgin, not of a man. Of the Father he was born without beginning; of the mother he was born today, with a definite beginning. Born of the Father, he made us; born of the mother, he remade us. He was born of the Father so that we might exist; he was born of the mother so that we might not perish. Now the Father begot one equal to himself, and the whole of whatever the Son is, he has from the Father. But that God is Father, he does not have from the Son. So we say that the Father is God from no one, the Son God from God. Therefore everything the Son does wonderfully, everything he says truly, he attributes to him from whom he is; nor can he be other than he from whom he is. Adam was made a man: he could be other than what he was made. For he was made righteous, and he could be unrighteous. But the only-begotten Son of God cannot be changed from what he is: he cannot be turned into something else, cannot be diminished, cannot not be what he was, cannot not be equal to the Father. But plainly he who gave all things to the Son at his birth gave to one who was not in need; without doubt the Father gave the Son his very equality with the Father as well. How did the Father give it? Did he beget him lesser and add to his form to make him equal? If he had done this, he would have given to one in need. But I have already told you what you must hold most firmly: that the Father gave all that the Son is, but to him in being born, not to one in need. If he gave to him in being born, not to one in need, he certainly gave equality too, and by giving equality he begot one equal. And although the one is one person and the other another, yet the one is not one thing and the other another thing: but what the one is, this the other is too. Not who the one is, this the other is: but what the one is, this the other is.

Notes and citation

Summary: Christ has two births, from the Father without time and from the virgin in time; the Son receives all he is from the Father, including his equality, given not to one in need but in his very begetting.

  • “Born today” shows that the sermon was preached at Christmas. The closing lines distinguish person (“who”) from nature (“what”).

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slips; stray mark): Dcum Filium genuit sive tempore → Dcum Filium genuit sine tempore; fecit cx Yirgine → fecit ex Virgine; et potuit ' esse → et potuit esse; Sed plane Hie, qui → Sed plane ille, qui; æqualitatem dando a-qualem → æqualitatem dando æqualem.

Topics: Trinity, Christology

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 140.2 (PL 38:463; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/140-1/#p-140-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-140-2) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).

140.3PL 38:463

Qui me misit, inquit, audistis: Qui me misit, inquit, ipse mihi mandatum dedit quid dicam, el quid loquar: ct scio quia mandatum ejus vita æterna est. Joannis Evangelium est, tenete. Qui me misit, ipsc mihi mandatum dedit quid dicam, et quid loquar: et scio quia mandatum ejus vita æterna est. 0 si donet ut dicam quod volo? Facit enim mihi angustias inopia mea, ct copia illius. Ipse, inquit, mandatum mihi dedit quid dicam, et quid loquar: et scio quia niandutum ejus vita æterna est. Quære in Epistola Joannis hujus evangelistæ quid de Christo dixit. Credamus, inquit, in verum Filium ejus Jesum Christum. Ipse cst verus Deus, et vita æterna. Quid est, Verus Deus, et vita æterna? Verus Filius Dei, verus Deus est, et vita æterna. Quare dixit, in verum Filium ejus? Quia inultos filios habet Dcus, propterea discernendus crat, addendo quod verus esset Filius. Non tantum dicendo qnod cst Filius; sed addendo, ut dixi, quod est vcrus Filius: idco discernendus crat, pro. pier multos filios, quos habel Deus. Nos enim filii sumus gratia, ille natura. Nos facti a Patre por ipsum: ille quod Pater, hoc et ipse est: numquid quod Deus est, sumus et nos?

“He who sent me,” he says, as you have heard; “he who sent me,” he says, “himself gave me a commandment, what I should say and what I should speak: and I know that his commandment is eternal life.” It is John’s Gospel; hold it fast. “He who sent me himself gave me a commandment, what I should say and what I should speak: and I know that his commandment is eternal life.” O that he would grant me to say what I want! For my poverty and his abundance put me in straits. “He himself,” he says, “gave me a commandment, what I should say and what I should speak: and I know that his commandment is eternal life.” Look in the Epistle of this John the evangelist for what he said of Christ. “Let us believe,” he says, “in his true Son Jesus Christ. He is the true God and eternal life.” What is “true God and eternal life”? The true Son of God is true God and eternal life. Why did he say “in his true Son”? Because God has many sons; therefore he had to be distinguished by adding that he was the true Son. Not only by saying that he is the Son, but by adding, as I said, that he is the true Son: he had to be distinguished because of the many sons God has. For we are sons by grace, he by nature. We were made by the Father through him: what the Father is, this he is too. Are we too what God is?

John 12:49–50 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 John 5:20 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Christ says the Father’s commandment is eternal life; John’s Epistle calls Christ, the true Son, true God and eternal life, distinguishing him from those who are sons by grace.

  • Quotations: John 12:49–50; 1 John 5:20.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slips): evangclist r quid do Christo → evangelistæ quid de Christo; l'erus Filius Dei → Verus Filius Dei; Nus enim filii → Nos enim filii; hoc ct ipse Cil: numquid quod Dcus cst, smnus ct nos → hoc et ipse est: numquid quod Deus est, sumus et nos.

Topics: Trinity

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 140.3 (PL 38:463; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/140-1/#p-140-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-140-3) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).

140.4PL 38:463

Sed.quidam de transverso, nesciens quid loquatur ait: Propterea, dictum cst, Ego et Pater unum sumus, quia habent inter sc concordem voluntatem, non quia ipsa est natura Filii, quæ cst natura Patris. Nam et Apostoli ( et hoc ille dixit, non ego), nam et Apostoli unum sunt cum Patre et Filio. Horrenda blasphemia! Et Apostoli, inquit, unum sunt cum Patrc et Filio, quia obediunt voluntati Patris ct Filii. Hoccine ausus est dicere? Dicat ergo Paulus: Ego et Deus unum sumus. Dicat Petrus, dicat quilibet propheta: Ego et Deus unum sumus. Non dicit: absit ut dicit. Novit se aliam esse naturam, salvandam naturam: novit se aliam esse naturam, illuminandam naluram. Nemo dicit: Ego et Deus unum sumus. Quantumcumque pro I. t. quantumcumque sanctitate præpolleat, quantolibet culmine virtutis excellat numquam dicit, Ego <t Deus unum sumus: quia si habet virtutem, et ideo hoc dicit; hoc dicendo, quod habebat, amisit.

But someone, coming at it sideways and not knowing what he is saying, has said: “It was said, I and the Father are one, because they have a harmonious will between them, not because the nature of the Son is the very nature of the Father. For the apostles too” (he said this, not I), “the apostles too are one with the Father and the Son.” A horrible blasphemy! “The apostles too,” he says, “are one with the Father and the Son, because they obey the will of the Father and the Son.” Did he dare to say this? Then let Paul say: “I and God are one.” Let Peter say it, let any prophet say: “I and God are one.” He does not say it: far be it from him to say it. He knows that his is another nature, a nature to be saved; he knows that his is another nature, a nature to be enlightened. No one says, “I and God are one.” However much progress he may make, however much he may excel in holiness, however high the peak of virtue he may reach, he never says, “I and God are one”: because if he has virtue and says this because of it, by saying it he loses what he had.

John 10:30 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Against the claim that Father and Son are one only in will, as the apostles are one with God by obedience, Augustine replies that no apostle or prophet ever dared to say “I and God are one.”

  • The opponent is Maximinus, named in Migne’s title. Quotation: John 10:30.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slips): unum sum eum Patre → unum sunt cum Patre; salvandam traturam → salvandam naturam; aliam esse nauram → aliam esse naturam; unum sImiis → unum sumus; hocdicendo, quod h jbebat,:insit → hoc dicendo, quod habebat, amisit.

Topics: Trinity, Heresy

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 140.4 (PL 38:463; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/140-1/#p-140-4). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-140-4) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).

140.5PL 38:463–464

Æqualem ergo Patri credite Filium, sed tamen de Patre Filium, Patrem vero non de Filio. Origo apud illum, æqualitas apud istum. Nam si æqualis non est, verus Filius non est. Quid enim dicimus, fratres? Si æqualis non est, minor esl: si minor cst, interrogo salvandam naturam male credentem, quomodo minor natus est. Responde: minor crescit, an non? Si crescit, ergo et Pater senescit. Si autem quod natus est, hoc erit; si minor natus est, et minor erit: cum detrimento suo perfectus crit, cum detrimento formæ Patris perfectus natus, nunqunm perventurus est ad formam Patris. Sic impii addicitis Filium: sic hæretici blasphematis Filium. Quid ergo catholica fides dicit? Filius Deus de Patre Deo: Pater Deus non de Filio Deus. Sed Filius Deus æqualis Patri, æqualis natus, non minor natus; nun æqualis factus, sed æqualis natus. Qnod est ille, hoc et iste qui natus est. Aliquando fuit Pater sine Filio? Absit. Tolle Aliquando, ubi tempus non est. Semper Pater, semper Filius. Sinc initio temporis Pater, sine initio temporis Filius: nunquam Pater ante Filium, nunquam Pater sinc Filio. Sed tamen quia Filius Deus de Deo Patre, Pater autem Deus, sed non de Deo Filio; non nobis displiceat honorificentia Filii in Patre. Honorificentia enim Filii Patri tribuit honorem, non suam minuit divinitatem.

Believe, then, that the Son is equal to the Father, but yet that the Son is from the Father, and the Father not from the Son. The origin is with the one, the equality with the other. For if he is not equal, he is not a true Son. For what do we say, brothers? If he is not equal, he is lesser: if he is lesser, I ask that nature which needs saving and believes wrongly: how was he born lesser? Answer: does the lesser grow, or not? If he grows, then the Father grows old. But if he will be what he was born, if he was born lesser, he will also be lesser: he will be complete in his deficiency; born complete in his deficiency from the Father’s form, he will never come to the Father’s form. So, you impious ones, you demote the Son; so, you heretics, you blaspheme the Son. What then does the Catholic faith say? God the Son from God the Father; God the Father not God from the Son. But God the Son is equal to the Father, born equal, not born lesser; not made equal, but born equal. What the one is, this is he too who was born. Was the Father ever without the Son? Far from it. Take away “ever,” where there is no time. Always Father, always Son. The Father without beginning of time, the Son without beginning of time: never the Father before the Son, never the Father without the Son. But yet, since God the Son is from God the Father, while the Father is God but not from God the Son, let us not be displeased that the Son honors the Father. For the Son’s honoring gives honor to the Father; it does not lessen his own divinity.

Notes and citation

Summary: The Son is from the Father yet equal to him, born equal and eternal; a lesser Son would either grow, making the Father age, or remain forever deficient; the Son’s honoring of the Father does not lessen his divinity.

  • The clause “he will be complete in his deficiency” renders a difficult sentence by sense.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slips): Æqualem ergo Pat i credite → Æqualem ergo Patri credite; minor cruscit → minor crescit; ergo et iater scnescit → ergo et Pater senescit; Filius Dtu3 de Patre → Filius Deus de Patre.

Topics: Trinity, Heresy

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 140.5 (PL 38:463–464; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/140-1/#p-140-5). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-140-5) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).

140.6PL 38:464

Quia ergo dicebam, quod proposueram, Et scio, ait, quia mandatum ejus vita æterna est. Intendite, fratres, quod dico: Scio quia mandatum ejus vita æterna eat. Et legimus apud ipsum Joannem de Christo, Ipse est verus Deus, ei vita æterna. Si mandatum Patris vita æterna est, et Christus Filius ipse est vita æterna; mandatum Patris ipse Filius est. Quomodo enim non est mandatum Patris, quod cst Verbum Patris? Aut si mandatum a Patre Filio datum carnaliter accipitis, tanquam dixeril Pater Filio, Hoc mando tibi, hoc illud volo facias: quibus verbis locutus est unico Verbo? Numquid quando mandatum dabat ad Verbum, verba quærebat? Quia ergo vita æterna est Patris mandatum, et ipse Filius cst vita alterna, credite et accipite, credite ct intelligite, quia Propheta dicit, Nisi credideritis, non intelligetis. Non capitis? dilatamini. Apostolum audile: Dilatamini, ne sitis jugum ducentes cum infidelibus. Qui hoc nolunt credere antequam capiant, infideles sunt. Quia vero infideles esse voluerunt, imperiti remanebunt. Credant crgo, ut intelligant. Prorsus mandatum Palris vita æterna est. Ergo mandatum Patris ipse Filius cst, qui hodic natus est: mandalum non a tempore datum, sed mandalum natum. Exercet mentes Evangelium Joannis, limat cl excarnat, ut de Deo non carnaliter, sed spiritualiter sapiamus. Sulficiant ergo ista, fratres, vobis: ne in longitudine disputationis subrepat somnus obliviosus.

As I was saying, then, what I had set out: “And I know,” he says, “that his commandment is eternal life.” Attend, brothers, to what I say: “I know that his commandment is eternal life.” And we read in the same John of Christ, “He is the true God and eternal life.” If the Father’s commandment is eternal life, and Christ the Son is himself eternal life, then the Father’s commandment is the Son himself. For how is that not the Father’s commandment which is the Father’s Word? Or if you take carnally the commandment given by the Father to the Son, as if the Father said to the Son, “I command you this, I want you to do that”: in what words did he speak to the only Word? When he gave a commandment to the Word, did he look for words? Since, then, eternal life is the Father’s commandment, and the Son himself is eternal life, believe and receive, believe and understand; for the prophet says, “Unless you believe, you will not understand.” You do not grasp it? Be enlarged. Hear the apostle: “Be enlarged; do not be yoked with unbelievers.” Those who will not believe this before they grasp it are unbelievers. And because they have chosen to be unbelievers, they will remain ignorant. Let them believe, then, so that they may understand. Plainly the Father’s commandment is eternal life. So the Father’s commandment is the Son himself, who was born today: a commandment not given in time, but a commandment born. The Gospel of John exercises minds, files them and frees them from the flesh, so that we may think of God not carnally but spiritually. Let this be enough for you, then, brothers, lest in a long discussion a forgetful sleep should creep in.

John 12:50 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 John 5:20 (quotation, high confidence) · Isa 7:9 (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Cor 6:13–14 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Since the Father’s commandment is eternal life and the Son is eternal life, the commandment is the Son himself, the Father’s Word; this must be believed in order to be understood.

  • “Born today”: a Christmas sermon. Quotations: John 12:50; 1 John 5:20; Isa 7:9 (Septuagint form); 2 Cor 6:13–14.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slips; stray mark): carnylitcr accipitis → carnaliter accipitis; mandatum a Patre-Filio datum → mandatum a Patre Filio datum; mandatum l'atris ipse Filius → mandatum Patris ipse Filius.

Topics: Trinity

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 140.6 (PL 38:464; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/140-1/#p-140-6). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-140-6) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).

Chapter 141

141.1PL 38:464

Inter cætera, cum sanctum Evangelium legerctur, audistis quod ait Dominus Jesus: Ego sum via, et veritas, et vita. Veritatem et vitam omnis homo cupit: sed viam non omnis homo invenit. Deum esse quamdam vitam æternam, immutabilem, intelligibilem, intelligentem, sapientem, sapicntes facientem, nonnulli etiam hujus sæculi philosophi viderunt. Veriiatem fixam, stabilem, indeclinabilem, ubi sunt omnes rationes rerum omnium creatarum, viderunt quidem, sed de longinquo; viderunt, sed in errore positi: et idcirco ad eam tam magnam et ineffabilem et beatificam possessionem, qua via perveniretur, non invenerunt. Nam quia viderunt etiam ipsi (quanlum videri ab homine potest) creatorem per creaturam, factorem perfacturam, fabricatorem mundi per mundum, Paulus apostolus testis est, cui utiquc debent credere Christiani. Ait cnim, cum de talibus loquerctur: Revelatur ira Dei de coelo super omnem impietatem. Ista, sicut recognoscitis, Pauli apostoli verba sunt. Revelatur ira Dei de coelo super omnem impietatem et injustitiam hominum, qui veritatem iniquitate delinent. Numquid dixit eos non detinere veritatem? Sed, veritatem in iniquitate detinent. Bonum est quod tenent: sed malum est ubi tenent. Veritatem in iniquitate detinent,

Among other things, when the holy Gospel was read, you heard what the Lord Jesus said: “I am the way, and the truth, and the life.” Every man desires truth and life; but not every man finds the way. That God is a certain life, eternal, unchangeable, intelligible, intelligent, wise, making wise, some philosophers of this world too have seen. The fixed, stable, unswerving truth, in which are the principles of all created things, they saw indeed, but from afar; they saw, but from where they stood in error: and therefore they did not find by what way one might come to that possession, so great, so ineffable, so beatifying. For that they too saw (as far as man can see) the Creator through the creature, the maker through what he made, the builder of the world through the world, the apostle Paul is witness, whom Christians certainly ought to believe. For he says, when speaking of such men: “The wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness.” These, as you recognize, are the words of the apostle Paul: “The wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold back the truth in unrighteousness.” Did he say that they do not hold the truth? No, but “they hold back the truth in unrighteousness.” What they hold is good; but where they hold it is bad. “They hold back the truth in unrighteousness.”

John 14:6 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 1:18 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Some philosophers saw God, the unchanging truth, through creation but did not find the way to him; Paul says they hold the truth in unrighteousness.

  • Augustine has the Platonists in mind. Quotations: John 14:6; Rom 1:18.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (Migne's marginal heading left in the text; OCR slips): Veritas a philosophis hujus sæculi inventa, non via. Inter ca tera, cuin → Inter cætera, cum.

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 141.1 (PL 38:464; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/140-1/#p-141-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-141-1) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).

141.2PL 38:464–465

Occurrebat autem, ut diceretur ei: Unde illi impii veritatem detinent? Numquid Deus ad quemquam eorum locutus est? Numquid legem acceperunt, sicut Israelitarum populus per Moysen? Unde ergo detinent veritatem, vel in ipsa iniquitate? Audite quod sequitur, et ostendit. Quia quod nolum est Dei, inquit, manifestum eat in illis: Deus enim illis manifestavit. Manifestavit illis quibus legem non dedit? Audi quomodo manifestavit. Invisibilia euim ejus, per ea quat facta sunt, intellecta conspiciuntur. Interroga mundum, ornatum coeli, fulgorcm dispositionemque siderum v solcm diei sufficientem, lunam noctis solatium: interroga terram fructificantem herbis et lignis, animalibus plenam, hominibus exornatam: interroga mare, quantis et qualibus natatilibus plenum: interroga acra, quantis volatilibus viget: interroga omnia, et vide si non sensu suo tanquam tibi respondent. Deus nos fecit. Hæc et philosophi nobiles quæsierunt, et ex arte artificem cognoverunt. Quid crgo? quare revelatur ira Dei super ipsam impietatem? Quia veritatem in iniquitate detinent? Veniat, ostendat quomodo. Jam enim dixit, quomodo cognoverunt. Invisibilia ejus, id est, Dei, per ea quæ facta sunt, intellecta conspiciuntur; sempiterna quoque ejus virtus et divinitas; ut sint inexcusabiles. Quia cum cognovissent Deum, non sicut Deum honorificaverunt, aut gratias egerunt; sed evanuerunt in cogitationibus suis, et obscuratum est insipiens cor eorum. Apostoli verba sunt, non mea: Et obscuratum est insipiens cor eorum; dicentes enim se esse sapientes, stulti facti sunt. Quod curiositate invenerunt, superbia perdiderunt. Dicentes se esse sapientes, id est, donum Dei sibi tribuentes, stulti facti sunt. Verba, inquam, Apostoli sunt: Dicentes se esse sapientes, stulti facti sunt.

But it occurred to him that someone might say to him: “From where do these ungodly men hold the truth? Did God speak to any of them? Did they receive the Law, as the people of the Israelites did through Moses? From where, then, do they hold the truth, even in that unrighteousness?” Hear what follows, and he shows it. “Because what can be known of God,” he says, “is manifest in them: for God has manifested it to them.” Manifested it to those to whom he did not give the Law? Hear how he manifested it. “For his invisible things are clearly seen, being understood through the things that are made.” Ask the world, the ornament of the sky, the brightness and arrangement of the stars, the sun sufficient for the day, the moon the comfort of the night; ask the earth, fruitful in plants and trees, full of animals, adorned with men; ask the sea, filled with how many and what kinds of swimming creatures; ask the air, alive with how many flying creatures; ask all things, and see whether they do not answer you, as it were, in their own way: “God made us.” Noble philosophers too have searched out these things, and have come to know the artist from the art. What then? Why is the wrath of God revealed against this very ungodliness? Because they hold back the truth in unrighteousness? Let him come, let him show how. For he has already said how they came to know. “His invisible things,” that is, God’s, “are clearly seen, being understood through the things that are made; his eternal power also and divinity; so that they are without excuse. Because when they knew God, they did not glorify him as God or give thanks; but they became vain in their thoughts, and their foolish heart was darkened.” They are the apostle’s words, not mine: “And their foolish heart was darkened; for professing themselves to be wise, they became fools.” What they found by curiosity they lost by pride. “Professing themselves to be wise,” that is, attributing God’s gift to themselves, “they became fools.” They are the apostle’s words, I say: “Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools.”

Rom 1:19–22 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: God manifested himself to the philosophers through creation, which answers all who question it, “God made us”; but they did not glorify him, and in their pride became fools.

  • Quotations: Rom 1:19–22.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slips; stray marks): sicut lirælitarum → sicut Israelitarum; anim:,. libus plenam, hominibus exornatam I: interr ga → animalibus plenam, hominibus exornatam: interroga; Quia reritatem → Quia veritatem; sapientes,.tulli facti → sapientes, stulti facti.

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 141.2 (PL 38:464–465; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/140-1/#p-141-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-141-2) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).

141.3PL 38:465

Ostende, proba stultitiam ipsorum. Ostende, Apostole, et sicut ostendisti nobis unde potuerunt pervenire ad cognitionem Dei, quoniam invisibilia ejus, per ea quæ facta sunt, intellecta conspiciuntur: ita nune ostende quomodo dicentes se esse sapientes, stulti facti sunt. Audi: Quia immutaverunt, ait, gloriam incorruptibilis Dei in similitudinem imaginis corruptibilis hominis, et volucrum, et quadrupedum, et serpentium. Figuras enim istorum animalium, sibi deos Pagani fecerunt. Invenisti Deum, et colis idolum. Invenisli veritatem, et ipsam veritatem in injustitia detines. Et quod per Dei opera cognovisti, per opera hominis perdis. Totum considcrasti; coeli, terræ, maris, elementorumque omnium ordinem collegisti: istud non vis attendere, quod mundus opus est Dei, idolum opus est fabri. Si faber idolo, sicut dedit figuram, daret et cor; ab ipso idolo faber adoraretur. Quomodo enim, o homo, faber tuus Deus est, sic homo idoli-faber est. Quis est Deus tuus? Qui te fecit. Quis est Deus fabri? Qui illum fecit. Quis est Deus idoli? Qui fecit illud. Ergo si idolum cor habcret, nonne fabrum adoraret qui illud fecit? Ecce in qua iniquitate veritatem tenuerunt, et ad possessionem illam quam viderunt, viam perducentem non invenerunt.

Show it; prove their folly. Show it, apostle; and as you have shown us from where they could come to the knowledge of God, since his invisible things are clearly seen, being understood through the things that are made, so now show how, professing themselves to be wise, they became fools. Hear: “Because they changed,” he says, “the glory of the incorruptible God into the likeness of an image of corruptible man, and of birds, and of four-footed beasts, and of serpents.” For the pagans made gods for themselves of the figures of these animals. You found God, and you worship an idol. You found the truth, and you hold back that very truth in unrighteousness. And what you came to know through God’s works, you lose through man’s works. You have considered the whole; you have gathered the order of heaven, earth, sea, and all the elements: and you will not attend to this, that the world is the work of God, the idol the work of a craftsman. If the craftsman could give the idol a heart, as he gave it a shape, the craftsman would be worshiped by his own idol. For as your maker, O man, is God, so the idol’s maker is a man. Who is your God? He who made you. Who is the craftsman’s God? He who made him. Who is the idol’s god? He who made it. So if the idol had a heart, would it not worship the craftsman who made it? See in what unrighteousness they held the truth, and did not find the way leading to that possession which they saw.

Rom 1:20 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 1:22–23 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The philosophers’ folly was idolatry: knowing God from his works, they worshiped images made by craftsmen, which, if they had hearts, would worship their makers.

  • The opening sentence, removed by the importer as a heading, is Augustine’s own and is restored. Quotations: Rom 1:20, 22–23.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (restored text removed as a heading; stray mark): Ostende, Apostole, et sicut → Ostende, proba stultitiam ipsorum. Ostende, Apostole, et sicut; Figuras i enim → Figuras enim.

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 141.3 (PL 38:465; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/140-1/#p-141-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-141-3) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).

141.4PL 38:465

Christus autem, quia ipse est apud Patrem veritas et vita, Verbum Dei, de quo dictum est, Vita erat lux hominum: quia ergo ipse est apud Patrem veritas et vita, et non habebamus qua iremus ad veritatem; Filius Dei qui semper in Patre veritas et vita est, assumendo hominem factus est via. Ambula per hominem, et pervenis ad Deum. Per ipsum vadis, ad ipsum vadis. Noli quærere qua ad illum venias, præter ipsum. Si enim via esse ipse noluisset, semper erraremus. Factus ergo via est qua venias. Non tibi dico, quære viam. Ipsa via ad te venit: surge et ambula. Ambula moribus, non pedibus. Multi enim bene ambulant pedibus, et male ambulant moribus. Aliquando enim ipsi bene ambulantes, præter viam currunt. Invenies quippe homines bene viventes, et non christianos. Benecurrunt: sed in via non currunt. Quanto plus currunt, plus errant; quia a via recedunt. Si autem tales homines perveniant ad viam, et teneant viam, o quanta securitas est, quia et bene ambulant, et uon errant! Si autem non tenent viam, quantumvis bene ambulent, heu quam dolendum est! Melius est enim in via claudicare, quam præter viam fortiter ambulare. Hæc satis sint Charitati vestræ. Conversi ad Dominum, etc.

But Christ, because he himself is with the Father the truth and the life, the Word of God, of whom it was said, “The life was the light of men”; because, then, he himself is with the Father the truth and the life, and we had no way by which to go to the truth, the Son of God, who is always in the Father the truth and the life, became the way by taking up man. Walk by the man, and you come to God. You go through him; you go to him. Do not look for a way to come to him other than himself. For if he had not been willing to be the way, we would always have gone astray. So he became the way by which you may come. I do not say to you, look for the way. The way itself has come to you: arise and walk. Walk with your conduct, not with your feet. For many walk well with their feet and badly with their conduct. For sometimes even those who walk well run outside the way. For you will find men living well who are not Christians. They run well; but they do not run in the way. The more they run, the more they go astray, because they go away from the way. But if such men come to the way and hold to the way, O how great is their security, because they both walk well and do not go astray! But if they do not hold to the way, however well they walk, alas, how they are to be lamented! For it is better to limp in the way than to walk strongly beside the way. Let this be enough for your Charity. Turning to the Lord, and so on.

John 1:4 (quotation, high confidence) · John 14:6 (allusion, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Christ, who is truth and life with the Father, became the way by taking human nature; those who live well outside him run fast but off the road, and it is better to limp on the way than to stride beside it.

  • Quotations: John 1:4; John 14:6.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; stray footnote number; OCR slip; stray mark; word divided by stray marks): Christus aulem → Christus autem; factas est via → factus est via; præ.. ter ipsum → præter ipsum; præter viam currunt I. → præter viam currunt.; Conversi ad Dominum 1, cle. → Conversi ad Dominum, etc..

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 141.4 (PL 38:465; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/140-1/#p-141-4). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-141-4) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).