Recognitions 10.20–10.46
Pseudonymous: A Christian romance in the voice of Clement of Rome, who tells how he found Christ, followed Peter, and was reunited with his lost family (the 'recognitions'). It is not a work of Clement. It survives complete only in Rufinus of Aquileia's Latin translation; the Greek original is lost (fragments in Eusebius and Origen's Philocalia, and a Syriac version of parts). It shares a source with the Greek Clementine Homilies (the hypothetical 'Grundschrift', probably 3rd-century Syria), and the Recognitions are usually dated to the 4th century in their Greek form. Rufinus's preface to Bishop Gaudentius is reference 0.1.
Latin text: Migne, PG 1 (Latin text: Migne, Patrologia Graeca vol. 1 (1857), transcribed from library-scan OCR of the printed volume).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0). Compare: Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 8 (1886).
Chapter 10
10.20PG 1:1430b–1431b
Hactenus anilis gentilium fabula et genealogia processerit; sine fine enim est, si velim omnes generationes eorum quos deos appellant, et impia gesta proferre. Sed exempli gratia, omissis caeteris, unius quem maximum et praecipuum habent, quemque Jovem nominant, flagitiosa gesta replicabo. Hunc enim caelum dicunt tenere tanquam caeteris meliorem, qui statim ut adolevit, sororem propriam, quam Junonem dicunt, duxit uxorem, in quo utique statim fit similis pecudi. Juno Vulcanum parit, sed, ut tradunt, non ex Jove conceptum. Ex ipso autem Jove Medeam genuit, quam responso accepto, quod qui ex ea nasceretur fortior ipso esset et regno eum depelleret, assumens etiam ipse devorat; et rursum genuit de cerebro quidem Minervam, de femore vero Liberum. Post haec Thetidem cum adamasset, aiunt Prometheum pronuntiasse ei, quod si concubuisset cum ea, qui ex ea nasceretur fortior esset patre, et ob hoc veritus Peleo cuidam dat eam in matrimonium; dehinc Persephonae, quae ei ex Cerere fuerat suscepta, miscetur, ex qua Dionysium genuit, qui a Titanis discerptus est. Sed recordatus, inquit, ne forte pater suus Saturnus alium filium generaret, qui etiam se fortior nasceretur regnoque depelleret, oppugnare aggreditur patrem una cum fratribus ejus Titanis; quibus oppressis, ad ultimum etiam patrem in vincula conjecit, desectaque ejus genitalia in mare projecit. Sed cruor qui defluxit ex vulnere, susceptus fluctibus et frequenti collisione in spumam versus, procreavit eam quam dicunt Aphroditen, quamque apud nos Venerem appellant. Ex hujus concubitu quae erat utique soror, hunc ipsum Jovem ferunt genuisse Cyprin, ex qua aiunt et Cupidinem natum.
“So far let the old wives' fable and genealogy of the Gentiles go; for there would be no end if I wished to set out all the generations of those they call gods and their impious deeds. But by way of example, leaving out the others, I will recount the shameful deeds of the one whom they hold greatest and chief, whom they name Jupiter. For they say that he holds heaven as better than the rest. As soon as he grew up, he took his own sister, whom they call Juno, as wife—in which he at once becomes like a beast. Juno bore Vulcan, but, as they relate, not conceived by Jupiter. By Jupiter himself she bore Medea; and he, having received an oracle that one born of her would be stronger than he and drive him from his kingdom, himself also took her and devoured her; and again he begot Minerva from his brain, and Liber from his thigh. After this, when he had fallen in love with Thetis, they say Prometheus declared to him that if he lay with her, the one born of her would be stronger than his father; and fearing this he gave her in marriage to one Peleus. Next he has intercourse with Persephone, who had been born to him from Ceres, and by her begot Dionysus, who was torn apart by the Titans. But remembering, it says, lest his father Saturn should beget another son who would be born stronger even than he and drive him from his kingdom, he set about attacking his father together with his brothers the Titans; and when they had been overcome, at last he also threw his father into chains, cut off his genitals, and threw them into the sea. But the blood that flowed from the wound, received by the waves and turned into foam by frequent dashing, produced her whom they call Aphrodite, whom among us they call Venus. From intercourse with her, who was certainly his sister, they relate that this same Jupiter begot Cypris, from whom they say Cupid was also born.
Notes and citation
Summary: Clement recounts Jupiter's incest with his sister Juno, his swallowing of Metis, the births of Minerva and Liber, his incest with Persephone, his overthrow and castration of Saturn, and the birth of Aphrodite.
- “Medea” is printed; the myth of the swallowed consort is told of Metis (Hesiod, Theog. 886–900). The castration of Saturn and birth of Aphrodite are told of Uranus by Hesiod, Theog. 176–200; this version is translated as given (compare Homilies 5.13).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR; OCR word join): omissis caneris → omissis caeteris; Hunc enim cmlum → Hunc enim caelum; Juno Vulcanum parit. sed. ut → Juno Vulcanum parit, sed, ut; nasceretur l‘ortior → nasceretur fortior; Persephonm → Persephonae; Dionysium genuitqui → Dionysium genuit, qui; una eum fratribus → una cum fratribus; in vineula → in vincula; ex. vulnere → ex vulnere; Apliroditen → Aphroditen; concubitu qua‘. erat → concubitu quae erat; aiunt etCupidinem → aiunt et Cupidinem.
Extrabiblical texts: Hesiod, Theog. 176–200, 886–900 (Hesiod, Theogony; allusion); Ps.-Clem. Hom. 5.13 (Homilies; echo)
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 10.20 (PG 1:1430b–1431b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/10-20/#p-10-20). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-10-20) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
10.21PG 1:1431b–1432b
Haec quidem de incestis ejus; audi nunc et de adulteriis. Europam Oceani conjugem vitiat, ex qua nascitur Dodonaeus; Helenam Pandionis, ex qua nascitur Musaeus; Eurynomen Asopi, ex qua nascitur Ogygias; Hermionen Oceani, ex qua nascuntur Charites, Thalia, Euphrosyne, Aglaia; Themin sororem suam, ex qua nascuntur Horae, Eurynomia, Dice, Irene; Themisto Inachi, ex qua nascitur Arcas; Ideam Minois, ex qua nascitur Asterion; Phoenissam Alphionis, ex qua nascitur Endymion; Io Inachi, ex qua nascitur Epaphus; Hippodamiam et Isionen Danai filias, quarum unam Hippodamiam Olenus, Isionen vero Orchomenus sive Chryses habuit; Carmen Phoenicis, ex qua nascitur Britomartis, quae fuit sodalis Dianae; Callisto Lycaonis, ex qua nascitur Orcas; Lyheen Munanti, ex qua nascitur Belus; Latonam, ex qua nascitur Apollo et Diana; Leanidam Eurymedontis, ex qua nascitur Coron; Lysitheam Eveni, ex qua nascitur Helenus; Hippodamiam Bellerophontis, ex qua nascitur Sarpedon; Megacliten Macarei, ex qua nascitur Thebe et Locrus; Nioben Phoronei, ex qua nascitur Argus et Pelasgus; Olympiadam Neoptolemi, ex qua nascitur Alexander; Pyrrham Promethei, ex qua nascitur Helmetheus; Protogeniam et Pandoram Deucalionis filias. ex quibus genuit Ethelium et Dorum et Meleram et Pandorum; Thaicruciam Protei, ex qua nascitur Nympheus; Salaminam Asopi, ex qua nascitur Saracon: Taygeten, Electram. Maiam, Plutiden, Atlantis filias, ex quibus genuit ex Taygete quidem Lacedaemonem, ex Electra Dardanum. ex Maia Mercurium, ex Plutide Tantalum; Phthiam Phoronei, ex qua genuit Achaeum; [Choniani Aramni. ex qua genuit Laconem;] Chalceam nympham, ex qua nascitur Olympus; Charidiam nympham ex qua nascitur Alchanus; Clorida, quae fuit Ampyei, ex qua nascitur Mopsus; Cotonium Lesbi, ex qua nascitur Polymedes; Hippodamiam Aniceti: Chrysogeniam Penei, ex qua nascitur Thessalus.
“So much for his incests; hear now about his adulteries. He violates Europa, wife of Oceanus, from whom Dodonaeus is born; Helen, daughter of Pandion, from whom Musaeus is born; Eurynome, daughter of Asopus, from whom Ogygias is born; Hermione, daughter of Oceanus, from whom the Graces are born, Thalia, Euphrosyne, Aglaia; Themis his sister, from whom the Hours are born, Eurynomia, Dike, Irene; Themisto, daughter of Inachus, from whom Arcas is born; Idaea, daughter of Minos, from whom Asterion is born; Phoenissa, daughter of Alphion, from whom Endymion is born; Io, daughter of Inachus, from whom Epaphus is born; Hippodamia and Isione, daughters of Danaus, of whom Olenus had the one, Hippodamia, and Orchomenus or Chryses had Isione; Carme, daughter of Phoenix, from whom is born Britomartis, who was a companion of Diana; Callisto, daughter of Lycaon, from whom Orcas is born; Libye, daughter of Munantus, from whom Belus is born; Latona, from whom Apollo and Diana are born; Leanida, daughter of Eurymedon, from whom Coron is born; Lysithea, daughter of Evenus, from whom Helenus is born; Hippodamia, daughter of Bellerophon, from whom Sarpedon is born; Megaclite, daughter of Macareus, from whom Thebe and Locrus are born; Niobe, daughter of Phoroneus, from whom Argus and Pelasgus are born; Olympias, daughter of Neoptolemus, from whom Alexander is born; Pyrrha, daughter of Prometheus, from whom Helmetheus is born; Protogenia and Pandora, daughters of Deucalion, from whom he begot Aethlius and Dorus and Melera and Pandorus; Thaicrucia, daughter of Proteus, from whom Nympheus is born; Salamis, daughter of Asopus, from whom Saracon is born; Taygete, Electra, Maia, Plutis, daughters of Atlas, from whom he begot—from Taygete, Lacedaemon; from Electra, Dardanus; from Maia, Mercury; from Plutis, Tantalus; Phthia, daughter of Phoroneus, from whom he begot Achaeus; (Choniane, daughter of Aramnus, from whom he begot Laco;) Chalcea, a nymph, from whom Olympus is born; Charidia, a nymph, from whom Alchanus is born; Chloris, who was the wife of Ampycus, from whom Mopsus is born; Cotonia, daughter of Lesbus, from whom Polymedes is born; Hippodamia, daughter of Anicetus; Chrysogenia, daughter of Peneus, from whom Thessalus is born.
Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.
Notes and citation
Summary: Clement lists dozens of women whom Jupiter seduced and the children born of them.
- Many names in this catalogue are corrupt in the scan and in the manuscript tradition; they are given as printed, with only clear OCR slips corrected (the usual forms are, e.g., Eunomia for “Eurynomia” and Arcas for “Orcas”). The words in round brackets are in square brackets in the edition, which marks them as doubtful. Footnote numbers printed in the text have been removed. Compare Homilies 5.13–14.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR; OCR (Greek letters for Latin); OCR and footnote number in the text; footnote number in the text): nasoitnrDodonaeusflS); → nascitur Dodonaeus;; Euphrosyne,Aglaia → Euphrosyne, Aglaia; Dice, nene → Dice, Irene; Inachi, ἐκ qua → Inachi, ex qua; ldeam Minois → Ideam Minois; lo Inachi → Io Inachi; Hippodamiam et lsionen → Hippodamiam et Isionen; Olenus, lsionen → Olenus, Isionen; Macarei. ex qua → Macarei, ex qua; Argus etPelasgus;Olympiadam → Argus et Pelasgus; Olympiadam; Asopi ('55), ex qua → Asopi, ex qua; Lacedaamonem → Lacedaemonem; Chaleeam nympham → Chalceam nympham; nascitur Thissa’us → nascitur Thessalus.
Extrabiblical texts: Ps.-Clem. Hom. 5.13–14 (Homilies; echo)
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 10.21 (PG 1:1431b–1432b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/10-20/#p-10-21). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-10-21) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
10.22PG 1:1432b–1433a
Sed et alia sunt plurima ejus adulteria, ex quibus nec progeniem suscepit, quae enumerare satis longum est. Verum ex his omnibus quas enumeravimus, nonnullas transformatus, utpote magus, vitiavit. Denique Antiopen Nyctei versus in satyrum corrupit, ex qua nascuntur Amphion et Zethus; Alcmenam mutatus in virum ejus Amphitryonem, ex qua nascitur Hercules; Aiginam Asopi mutatus in aquilam, ex qua nascitur Aeacus. Sed et Ganymedem Dardani, mutatus nihilominus in aquilam stuprat; Mantheam Phoci mutatus in ursum, ex qua nascitur Arctos; Danaen Acrisii mutatus in aurum, ex qua nascitur Perseus; Europen Phoenicis mutatus in taurum, ex qua nascitur Minos et Rhadamantus, Sarpedonque; Eurymedusam Achelai mutatus in formicam, ex qua nascitur Myrmidon; Thaliam (Afltnam) nympham mutatus in vulturem, ex qua nascuntur apud Siciliam Palisci; Imandram Geneani apud Rhodum, mutatus in imbrem; Cassiopeiam mutatus in virum ejus Phoenicem, ex qua nascitur Anchinos; Ledam Thestii mutatus in cycnum, ex qua nascitur Helena; et iterum eamdem mutatus in stellam, ex qua nascuntur Castor et Pollux; Lamiam mutatus in upupam; Mnemosynen mutatus in pastorem, ex qua nascuntur Musae novem; Nemesin mutatus in anserem; Semelen Cadmiam mutatus in ignem, ex qua nascitur Dionysius. Ex filia autem sua Cerere genuit Persephonen, quam et ipsam corrupit mutatus in draconem.
“And there are very many other adulteries of his, from which he received no offspring, which it would take too long to list. But of all those we have listed, he violated some after transforming himself, as a magician. Indeed he corrupted Antiope, daughter of Nycteus, turned into a satyr, from whom Amphion and Zethus are born; Alcmene, changed into her husband Amphitryon, from whom Hercules is born; Aegina, daughter of Asopus, changed into an eagle, from whom Aeacus is born. He also debauches Ganymede, son of Dardanus, likewise changed into an eagle; Manthea, daughter of Phocus, changed into a bear, from whom Arctos is born; Danae, daughter of Acrisius, changed into gold, from whom Perseus is born; Europa, daughter of Phoenix, changed into a bull, from whom Minos and Rhadamanthus and Sarpedon are born; Eurymedusa, daughter of Achelous, changed into an ant, from whom Myrmidon is born; Thalia (Aetna), a nymph, changed into a vulture, from whom the Palici in Sicily are born; Imandra, daughter of Geneanus, at Rhodes, changed into a shower; Cassiopeia, changed into her husband Phoenix, from whom Anchinus is born; Leda, daughter of Thestius, changed into a swan, from whom Helen is born; and again the same, changed into a star, from whom Castor and Pollux are born; Lamia, changed into a hoopoe; Mnemosyne, changed into a shepherd, from whom the nine Muses are born; Nemesis, changed into a goose; Semele, daughter of Cadmus, changed into fire, from whom Dionysus is born. And from his daughter Ceres he begot Persephone, whom he also corrupted, changed into a serpent.
Textual problem in this passage: see the notes.
Notes and citation
Summary: Clement lists the women and the youth Ganymede whom Jupiter seduced by changing into a satyr, eagle, bear, gold, bull, swan, serpent, and other forms.
- Several names are corrupt in the scan and are given as printed; “Aetna” in round brackets is printed so in the edition. Compare Homilies 5.13.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR; OCR word join): ex bis omnibus → ex his omnibus; nascitur:Eacus → nascitur Aeacus; ursum,ex qua → ursum, ex qua; Aehelai → Achelai; Paiisci → Palisci; CassiOpeiammutatus in virum ejus Pbm‘ nicem → Cassiopeiam mutatus in virum ejus Phoenicem; quam etipsam → quam et ipsam.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 10.22 (PG 1:1432b–1433a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/10-20/#p-10-22). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-10-22) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
10.23PG 1:1433a–1434a
Sed et Europam patrui sui Oceani uxorem et sororem ejus Eurynomen adulterat, et patrem punit, et Pluten Atlantis filii sui adulterat filiam, ex qua natum sibi filium Tantalum damnat. Ex Larisse etiam Orchomeni genuit Tityonem, quem et ipsum suppliciis tradidit. Diam Ixionis filii sui diripiens uxorem, ipsum perennibus subjicit poenis, et pene omnes quos ex adulteriis genuit filios. violentae mortis conditione damnavit, quorum et sepulcra pene omnium manifesta sunt. Ipsius denique parricidae, qui et patruos peremit et uxores eorum vitiavit, sororibus stuprum intulit, multiformis magi sepulcrum evidens est apud Cretenses, qui tamen scientes et confitentes infanda ejus atque incesta opera, et omnibus enarrantes ipsi eum confiteri deum non erubescunt; unde mirum mihi et valde mirum videtur, quomodo is qui super omnes mortales scelere et flagitiis eminet, sanctum et quod est super omne bonum nomen acceperit, ut pater deorum atque hominum vocaretur; nisi forte ille qui malis hominum gaudet, eum quem sceleribus eminere supra caeteros vidit, supra caeteros ei honorem conferre infelices animas suasit, ut ad imitationem malorum invitaret universos.
“He also commits adultery with Europa, the wife of his uncle Oceanus, and with her sister Eurynome, and punishes the father; and he commits adultery with Plute, the daughter of his son Atlas, and condemns Tantalus, the son born to him from her. From Larissa, daughter of Orchomenus, he also begot Tityus, whom he too handed over to punishments. Snatching Dia, the wife of his son Ixion, he subjects Ixion himself to everlasting punishments; and almost all the sons he begot from adulteries he condemned to the lot of a violent death, and the tombs of almost all of them are well known. Finally, the tomb of this parricide himself, who both killed his uncles and violated their wives, who debauched his sisters, the many-shaped magician, is plain to see among the Cretans; who nevertheless, knowing and confessing his unspeakable and incestuous deeds and telling them to everyone, are not ashamed to confess him a god. Hence it seems to me a wonder, and a great wonder, how he who stands above all mortals in crime and wickedness received the holy name, which is above every good, so as to be called father of gods and men—unless perhaps he who rejoices in men's evils persuaded unhappy souls to confer on him, whom he saw standing above the rest in crimes, honor above the rest, so as to invite all to imitate evil.
Notes and citation
Summary: Jupiter's adulteries, his cruelty to his own offspring, and his tomb in Crete show him a wicked man, honored as father of gods only because the evil one wished to promote imitation of his crimes.
- The tomb of Zeus in Crete was a common apologetic argument (Callimachus, Hymn. 1.8–9; compare Homilies 5.23). A column number printed in the text has been removed.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR; OCR and column number in the text): Eumpam patrui → Europam patrui; Atlantis lilii sui adulterat liliam,ex qua → Atlantis filii sui adulterat filiam, ex qua; genuit Τ ityonem → genuit Tityonem; ipsi eum MM conlileri → ipsi eum confiteri; scele‘ ribus → sceleribus; su'asit → suasit.
Extrabiblical texts: Callimachus, Hymn. 1.8–9 (Callimachus (hymns and fragments); allusion); Ps.-Clem. Hom. 5.23 (Homilies; echo)
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 10.23 (PG 1:1433a–1434a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/10-20/#p-10-23). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-10-23) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
10.24PG 1:1434a
Sed et filiorum ejus, qui apud eos dii putantur, sepulcra singulis quibusque in locis manifestissime demonstrantur: Mercurii apud Hermopolim, Cypria: Veneris apud Cyprum, Martis in Thracia, Liberi apud Thebas, ubi discerptus traditur, Herculis apud Tyrum, ubi igni crematus est, in Epidauro Aesculapii; quique omnes non solum ut homines defuncti. sed ut nequam homines puniti pro sceleribus docentur, et tamen ab stultis hominibus ut dii adorantur.
“The tombs of his sons too, who are thought gods among them, are shown most plainly in their several places: Mercury's at Hermopolis, Cyprian Venus's in Cyprus, Mars's in Thrace, Liber's at Thebes, where he is said to have been torn apart, Hercules's at Tyre, where he was burned in fire, Aesculapius's in Epidaurus. All of these are shown to have died not only as men, but to have been punished as wicked men for their crimes; and yet they are worshiped as gods by foolish men.
Notes and citation
Summary: The tombs of Jupiter's sons, shown in various places, prove they were mortal and wicked men.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR): putano tur → putantur; diu scerptus → discerptus; Aflsculapii → Aesculapii.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 10.24 (PG 1:1434a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/10-20/#p-10-24). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-10-24) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
10.25PG 1:1434a–1435a
Quod si argumentari volunt, et magis haec loca ortus eorum quam sepulturae vel mortis affirmant, ex vicinis et adhuc recentibus gestis priora et vetera convincentur, cum docuerimus adorari ab eis eos, quos etiam homines ipsi et defunctos vel potius punitos esse profitentur, verbi gratia ut Syri Adenem, Aegyptii Osirin, Ilienses Hectorem. apud Leuconessum Achillem, apud Pontum Patroclum, apud Rhodum Alexandrum Macedonem, multosque alios per diversa loca singuli ut deos colunt et adorant, quos homines mortuos fuisse non dubitant. Unde consequens est etiam priores simili errore prolapsos, mortuis hominibus, qui forte potentiae aliquid vel artis habuerant, maximeque si phantasiis magicis in stuporem stolidos homines adduxerant, honorem contulisse divinum.
“And if they wish to argue and assert that these places are rather of their birth than of their burial or death, they will be refuted from neighboring and still recent events concerning earlier and older ones, when we show that they worship those whom they themselves admit were men and died, or rather were punished: for example, the Syrians Adonis, the Egyptians Osiris, the people of Ilium Hector, Achilles at Leuconesus, Patroclus in Pontus, Alexander of Macedon at Rhodes; and each worships and adores as gods many others in various places, whom they do not doubt were dead men. Hence it follows that the earlier ones too, slipping into a similar error, conferred divine honor on dead men who perhaps had had some power or art, and especially if they had brought foolish men into amazement by magical phantasms.
Notes and citation
Summary: Since peoples still worship recently deified mortals such as Adonis, Osiris, Hector, Achilles, and Alexander, the older gods too must have been dead men honored in error.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR): et magis hmo loca ortus eorum quam sepultura: vel mortis allir. mant → et magis haec loca ortus eorum quam sepulturae vel mortis affirmant; Aigyptii → Aegyptii; adorant, nquos → adorant, quos; potentirelaliquid vel artis habuerant,.. → potentiae aliquid vel artis habuerant,.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 10.25 (PG 1:1434a–1435a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/10-20/#p-10-25). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-10-25) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
10.26PG 1:1435a–1435b
Jam hinc additum est, ut et poetae elegantia verborum commenta erroris ornarent, et suavitate dicendi immortales effectos esse ex mortalibus persuaderent; imo et amplius aliquid, ex hominibus aiunt stellas fieri, et arbores, et animalia, et flores, et aves fontesque ac fluvios, et ni verbositas videretur, omnes pene stellas, quas ex hominibus effectas asserunt enumerare vel arbores vel fontes ac fluvios possem; exempli tamen causa singula saltem ex singulis memorabo. Andromedam Cephei in stellam dicunt esse conversam, Daphnen Ladonis fluvii filiam in arborem commutatam, Hyacinthum Apollinis dilectum in florem, Callisto in sidus quod -Arcton vocant, Prognen et Philomelam cum Tereo in aves, Thisben apud Ciliciam in fontem, et Pyramum inibi in fluvium resolutos, omnesque pene, ut dixi, vel stellas, vel arbores, fontesque ac fluvios, floresque et animalia, vel aves, aliquando homines fuisse confirmant.
“Then to this was added that the poets adorned the fabrications of error with elegance of words, and by sweetness of speech persuaded that mortals had been made immortals. Indeed they say even more: that from men stars come to be, and trees and animals and flowers and birds, springs and rivers. And if it did not seem wordy, I could list almost all the stars that they assert were made from men, or trees or springs and rivers; but by way of example I will mention at least one from each kind. They say Andromeda, daughter of Cepheus, was turned into a star; Daphne, daughter of the river Ladon, changed into a tree; Hyacinthus, the beloved of Apollo, into a flower; Callisto into the constellation they call the Bear; Procne and Philomela with Tereus into birds; Thisbe in Cilicia into a spring, and Pyramus there dissolved into a river; and almost all, as I said, whether stars or trees, springs and rivers, flowers and animals, or birds, they affirm were once men.
Notes and citation
Summary: The poets added tales of mortals transformed into stars, trees, flowers, birds, springs, and rivers.
- The transformations are those told in Ovid, Metamorphoses, among others.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR; OCR (Greek letters for Latin)): snavitate dicendi immortales ell'ectos → suavitate dicendi immortales effectos; stellas lieri → stellas fieri; et liores → et flores; ell‘ectas asserunt enumerare velarbores → effectas asserunt enumerare vel arbores; exsingulismemorabo.Andromedamfllephei → ex singulis memorabo. Andromedam Cephei; lluvii liliam → fluvii filiam; dilectum in liorem → dilectum in florem; Thyslien → Thisben; Pyra. mum → Pyramum; Iioresque → floresque; ῖυίεδθ Confirmant- → fuisse confirmant..
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 10.26 (PG 1:1435a–1435b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/10-20/#p-10-26). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-10-26) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
10.27PG 1:1435b–1436a
At Petrus haec audiens ait: Ergo secundum ipsos, antequam homines mutarentur in stellas, vel caetera quae enumeras, et cmlum sine stellis erat et terra sine arboribus et 'animalibus, nec fontes, nec flumina, nec aves erant; et quomodo ipsi homines vixerunt sine his, qui in haec postmodum mutati sunt, cum constet nec potuisse prorsus sine his vitam ducere homines in terris? Et. ego respondi: Sed ne ipsum quidem cultum deorum suorum observare consequenter norunt; unusquisque enim eorum quos colunt, habet aliquid sibi dicatum, a quo debent se continere cultores, utpote Minerva: olivam, Jovi capram ferunt dicatam, Cereri semina, Libero vinum, Osiri aquam, Hammoni arietem, Dianae cervum, Syrorum daemoni piscem et columbam, Vulcano ignem; et unicuique, ut dixi, est aliquid proprie dicatum, a quo oportebat abstinere se cultores ad honorem eorum quibus dicata sunt. Nunc autem singuli ab uno aliquo se observantes, pro unius honore caeteros omnes iratos habent; quos utique si placare velint, pro honore omnium abstinere se ab omnibus oportebat, ut ante diem iudicii justa a semetipsis sententia condemnati, morte miserrima per inediam deperirent.
When Peter heard this he said: “Then according to them, before men were changed into stars or the other things you list, heaven was without stars and earth without trees and animals, and there were neither springs nor rivers nor birds. And how did men themselves live without these things into which they were afterwards changed, since it is clear that men could not have lived on earth at all without them?” I answered: “But they do not even know how to observe the worship of their own gods consistently. For each of those they worship has something dedicated to him, from which the worshipers ought to abstain: they say the olive is dedicated to Minerva, the goat to Jupiter, seeds to Ceres, wine to Liber, water to Osiris, the ram to Ammon, the deer to Diana, the fish and the dove to the demon of the Syrians, fire to Vulcan; and to each, as I said, something is properly dedicated, from which the worshipers ought to abstain in honor of those to whom they are dedicated. But now each, keeping away from some one thing, has all the others angry with him for the sake of honoring one. Surely if they wished to placate them, they ought, in honor of all, to abstain from everything—so that before the day of judgment, condemned by a just sentence of their own, they would perish by a most miserable death from starvation.”
Notes and citation
Summary: Peter notes the absurdity of the transformation myths, and Clement adds that pagans cannot honor all their gods' sacred taboos without starving.
- The “demon of the Syrians” is Atargatis, to whom fish and doves were sacred.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR; OCR word join): secuudum → secundum; vcl caetera qure → vel caetera quae; ipsi ho- h mines → ipsi homines; in hinc postmodum mutatisunt → in haec postmodum mutati sunt; vitamducere → vitam ducere; Ilammoni → Hammoni; aliquo-se observantes,pro → aliquo se observantes, pro; onlnes → omnes; abjstlnere → abstinere; iudicii Ijusta → iudicii justa.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 10.27 (PG 1:1435b–1436a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/10-20/#p-10-27). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-10-27) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
10.28PG 1:1436a–1436b
Verum ad propositum revertamur. Quae mala ratio est, imo quae amentia mortalium possidet mentes, ut hominem quem impium, lestum, profanum, Jovem dico, incestum, parricidam, adulterum non solum sciunt esse, sed et publice in theatris cantant, hunc ut deum colant et adorent? Aut si pro his gestis deus esse meruit, ergo et si quos audiunt homicidas, adulteros. parricidas, incestos etiam nunc debent ut deos adorare. Sed quod in aliis exsecrantur, scire omnino non possum cur in illo venerentur. Et Petrus respondit: Quoniam te nescire dicis, disce a me cur in illo facinorosa gesta venerentur; primo quidem, ut cum ipsi similia egerint, acceptos se ei futuros sciant, utpote quem imitantur in flagitiis; secundo. quod haec litteris scite recondita et versibus eleganter inserta veteres reliquerunt. Et nunc puerilis eruditionis obtentu, cum eorum notitia teneris et simplicibus adhaeserit mentibus, revelli ex eis atque abjici difficulter potest.
“But let us return to the subject. What evil reason is it, or rather what madness possesses the minds of mortals, that a man whom they not only know to be impious, monstrous, profane—Jupiter, I mean—incestuous, a parricide, an adulterer, but even sing of him publicly in the theaters, they should worship and adore as a god? Or if he deserved to be a god for these deeds, then even now they ought to adore as gods any murderers, adulterers, parricides, and incestuous persons they hear of. But why they venerate in him what they execrate in others, I cannot know at all.” Peter answered: “Since you say you do not know, learn from me why they venerate criminal deeds in him. First, so that when they themselves do similar things, they may know they are acceptable to him, as one whom they imitate in shameful acts; second, because the ancients left these things skillfully stored in writings and elegantly woven into verses. And now, under the pretext of a boy's education, since knowledge of them has clung to tender and simple minds, it can hardly be torn out and cast away.”
Notes and citation
Summary: Clement wonders why pagans worship a criminal like Jupiter, and Peter explains that his example excuses their own sins and that his myths are embedded in schoolboy education.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR): ad prepositum revertamur. ‘Ouzi malum! ratio → ad propositum revertamur. Quae mala ratio; sed-et publice → sed et publice; parricidas,incestos → parricidas, incestos; lacinorosa → facinorosa; acceptos se ei lutum sciant → acceptos se ei futuros sciant; diIIiculter → difficulter.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 10.28 (PG 1:1436a–1436b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/10-20/#p-10-28). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-10-28) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
10.29PG 1:1436b
Haec cum dixisset Petrus, Niceta respondit: Non putes, domine mi Petre, non habere eruditos quosque gentilium verisimilitudines quasdam, quibus astruant haec quae culpabilia videntur et probrosa: quae quidem ego non ut confirmans errores eorum dico (absit enim a me, ut hoc vel ad cogitationem meam veniat), sed tamen scio esse apud prudentiores ipsorum defensiones quasdam. quibus astruere et colorare solent haec quae videntur absurda. Et si tibi placet, ut aliqua ex his proferam, quae ex parte aliqua retineo, ut jubes faciam. Cumque Petrus permisisset, Niceta hoc modo coepit:
When Peter had said this, Niceta answered: “Do not think, my lord Peter, that the learned among the Gentiles do not have certain plausible arguments by which they support these things that seem blameworthy and shameful. I say this not as confirming their errors—far be it from me that this should even come into my thought—but yet I know that among the more prudent of them there are certain defenses by which they are accustomed to support and color these things that seem absurd. And if it pleases you that I bring forward some of these, which I partly remember, I will do as you command.” When Peter had permitted it, Niceta began in this way:
Notes and citation
Summary: Niceta offers to present the allegorical defenses by which learned pagans justify their myths.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR; OCR word join): quibusastruere → quibus astruere; prole. ram → proferam; ut jubes iaciam. Cumque Ρριι-υέ permisisset, Nicela hoc modo «epit: → ut jubes faciam. Cumque Petrus permisisset, Niceta hoc modo coepit:.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 10.29 (PG 1:1436b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/10-20/#p-10-29). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-10-29) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
10.30PG 1:1436b–1437a
Omnis sermo apud Graecos, qui de antiquitatis origine conscribitur, cum alios multos, tum duos praecipuos auctores habet. Orpheum et Hesiodum. Horum ergo scripta in duas partes intelligentiae dividuntur, id est, secundum litteram et secundum allegoriam; et ad ea quidem quae secundam litteram sunt, ignobilis vulgi turba conflamus! vero quae secundum allegoriam constant, omnis philosophorum et eruditorum loquacitas adurit-’3“ est. Orpheus igitur est, qui dicit primo fuisse chaos sempiternum, immensum, ingenitum. quo omnia facta sunt; hoc sane ipsum chaos non tenebras dixit esse, non lucem, non humidum, non aridum, non calidum, non frigidum, sed omnia simul mista, et semper unum fuisse informe; aliquando tamen quasi ad ovi immanis modum, per immensa tempora effectam peperisse ac protulisse ex se duplicem quamdam speciem, quam illi masculofeminam vocant, ex contraria admistione hujusmodi diversitatis speciem concretam; et hoc esse principium omnium, quod primum ex materia puriore processerit, quodque procedens discretionem quatuor elementorum dederit, et ex duobus quae prima sunt elementis fecerit coelum, ex aliis autem terram, ex quibus jam omnia participatione sui invicem nasci dicit et gigni. Haec quidem Orpheus.
“All writing among the Greeks that is composed about the origin of antiquity has many authors, but two especially: Orpheus and Hesiod. Their writings are divided into two parts of understanding, that is, according to the letter and according to allegory; and the ignoble crowd of the common people has flocked to what is according to the letter, but all the talkativeness of philosophers and learned men has been devoted to what consists in allegory. It is Orpheus, then, who says that first there was chaos, eternal, immeasurable, unbegotten, from which all things were made. This chaos he said was neither darkness nor light, neither moist nor dry, neither hot nor cold, but all things mixed together, and was always one formless thing; yet at some time, as if after the manner of an immense egg, brought to completion through immeasurable ages, it brought forth and produced from itself a kind of double form, which they call male-female, a form compacted from the contrary mixture of such diversity. And this, he says, is the beginning of all things, which first proceeded from purer matter, and which, proceeding, produced the separation of the four elements, and made heaven from the two elements that are first, and earth from the others; from which he says that all things are now born and begotten by mutual participation. This is what Orpheus says.
Notes and citation
Summary: Niceta explains that the Greeks read Orpheus and Hesiod either literally or allegorically, and sets out the Orphic account of chaos, the cosmic egg, and the androgynous first principle that separated the elements.
- Compare Homilies 6.3–6. Some words are garbled in the scan and translated by sense.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR; OCR (Greek letters for Latin); OCR word join; stray mark): Hesiodum-Horum → Hesiodum. Horum; intelligenriae → intelligentiae; id ρει, secundum lum-am etsec'uav dum allegoriam → id est, secundum litteram et secundum allegoriam; fuisse ι) chaos → fuisse chaos; maseulofeminam vocant,ex → masculofeminam vocant, ex; concretam; ethoc → concretam; et hoc; duobus qua: prima → duobus quae prima.
Extrabiblical texts: Orpheus (attributed), Orph. frag. cosmic egg (Orpheus (attributed), Orphic poems (fragments); allusion); Ps.-Clem. Hom. 6.3–6 (Homilies; echo)
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 10.30 (PG 1:1436b–1437a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/10-20/#p-10-30). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-10-30) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
10.31PG 1:1437b
Subjungit autem his et Hesiodus, post chaos statim coelum dicens factum esse et terram, ex quibus ait progenitos illos undecim, quos interdum et duodecim dicit, ex quibus sex mares, quinque feminas ponit; nomina autem dat maribus: Oceanus, Ceus, Crius, Hyperion, Iapetus, Cronus, qui et Saturnus; item feminis: Thia, Rhea, Themis, Mnemosyne, Thetys, quae nomina per allegoriam hoc modo interpretantur: numerum quidem undecim vel duodecim, ipsam dicunt primam naturam, quam et Rheam a fluendo dictam volunt; reliquos autem decem accidentia ejus dicunt quas et qualitates appellant; duodecimum tamen addunt et Cronum quem apud nos Saturnum dicunt; hunc pro tempore accipiunt. Saturnum ergo et Rheam tempus ponunt et materiam, quae ubi cum humido et arido et calido et frigido tempore fuerint admista, omnia generant.
“Hesiod adds to this, saying that immediately after chaos heaven and earth were made, from which, he says, were begotten those eleven, whom he sometimes also calls twelve; of these he sets six as males and five as females. He gives these names to the males: Oceanus, Coeus, Crius, Hyperion, Iapetus, Cronus, who is also Saturn; and to the females: Theia, Rhea, Themis, Mnemosyne, Tethys. These names they interpret by allegory in this way: the number eleven or twelve, they say, is nature itself, the first, which they also want to be called Rhea from flowing; the other ten they call its accidents, which they also call qualities; and they add a twelfth, Cronus, whom among us they call Saturn, and take him for time. Saturn and Rhea, then, they set down as time and matter, which, when they are mixed with moist and dry and hot and cold over time, generate all things.
Notes and citation
Summary: From Hesiod's Titans the allegorists derive Rhea as primal matter (from “flowing”), Cronus as time, and the rest as qualities, which together generate all things.
- Rhea from ῥέω (“flow”), Cronus from χρόνος (“time”). Hesiod, Theog. 133–138.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR word join): quiet Saturnus → qui et Saturnus.
Extrabiblical texts: Hesiod, Theog. 133–138 (Hesiod, Theogony; allusion)
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 10.31 (PG 1:1437b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/10-20/#p-10-31). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-10-31) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
10.32PG 1:1437b–1438a
Haec ergo, inquit, primo omnium tempore multo concretam genuit quamdam quasi bullam, quae ex spiritu qui in aquis erat, paulatim collecta intumuit, et aliquanto tempore circumacta per superficiem materiae, ex qua quasi ex vulva processerat, rigore frigoris obdurata et glacialibus augmentis semper increscens, abrupta tandem demergitur in profundum, ac pondere ipso pertracta in infernum descendit, et quia invisibilis facta est, Aides appellata est, qui et Orcus vel Pluto nominatur. Cumque de superioribus mergeretur in inferna, locum confluendi humido praebuit elemento, et pars crassior, quae est terra, aquis cedentibus patefacta est. Hanc ergo aquarum libertatem, quae prius bulla obtegente premebatur, postquam illa inferni sortita est locum, Neptunum esse appellatam. Post hoc cum elementum frigidum per concretionem glacialis bullae ad inferiora fuisset absorptum, et aridum fuisset humidumque discretum, nullo jam impediente, elementum calidum ignis utpote vigore et levitate ad superiora convolavit aeris, spiritu et procella subvectum. Hanc ergo procellam, quae καταιγίς Graece appellatur, regem, id est capram dixerunt, et ignem qui ad superna conscendit, Jovem; et ideo eum capra subvectum conscendisse Olympum dicunt.
“This, then, he says, first of all, over a long time, brought forth a kind of compacted bubble, which, gradually gathered from the spirit that was in the waters, swelled up; and, carried round for some time over the surface of matter, from which it had come forth as from a womb, hardened by the stiffness of cold and always growing by icy accretions, at last broke off and sank into the depth; and drawn by its very weight it went down to the underworld; and because it became invisible it was called Aides, who is also named Orcus or Pluto. And when it sank from the upper regions into the lower, it gave the moist element room to flow together, and the denser part, which is earth, was laid bare as the waters gave way. This freedom of the waters, then, which had previously been pressed down by the covering bubble, after the bubble had obtained the place of the underworld, was called Neptune. After this, when the cold element had been absorbed into the lower regions through the congealing of the icy bubble, and the dry had been separated from the moist, with nothing now hindering, the hot element of fire, by its vigor and lightness, flew up to the upper regions of the air, borne up by wind and storm. This storm, then, which is called kataigis in Greek, they called a goat, and the fire which ascended to the heights, Jupiter; and therefore they say he ascended Olympus borne up by a goat.
Notes and citation
Summary: The allegorists explain Aides as a sinking icy bubble, Neptune as the waters set free, and Jupiter as fire borne aloft by the storm-wind, called the goat from kataigis.
- The pun on καταιγίς (“squall”) and αἴξ (“goat”) explains the myth of Jupiter carried up on a goat (10.19). The printed “regem” for “goat” is translated by sense (the Greek αἶγα).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR; OCR word join): materiaa → materiae; convolavitaeris → convolavit aeris; Grmce → Graece.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 10.32 (PG 1:1437b–1438a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/10-20/#p-10-32). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-10-32) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
10.33PG 1:1438a–1438b
Ipsum vero Jovem Graeci quidem a vivendo vel vitam dando, nostri a juvando nominatum volunt. Hanc ergo esse viventem substantiam ferunt, quae in superioribus posita, vi caloris velut cerebri ambitu ad se trahens cuncta. et cujusdam temperamenti moderatione componens, de capite dicitur genuisse sapientiam, quam Minervam vocant, quae a Graecis Ἀθήνη propter immortalitatem nominata est; quae quia pater omnium per sapientiam suam cuncta condidit, et ex ipso capite ejus et principali omnium genita dicitur loco, et temperata admistione elementorum universum formasse mundum et adornasse perhibetur. Igitur species quae materiae inditae sunt, ut fieret mundus, quia vi caloris constringuntur, Jovis viribus contineri dicuntur. Quae quoniam sufficienter se habent, nec ultra addi sibi indigent aliquid novi, sed unumquodque seminis sui posteritate reparatur, vinctae esse a Jove Saturni manus dicuntur: quia nihil novi jam, ut dixi, ex materia tempus producit, sed calor seminum secundum sui speciem cuncta restituit, nec ultra Rheae partus, hoc est propago materiae fluentis, ascendit, et ideo ipsam primam elementorum divisionem abscisionem Saturni nominant, quasi qui ultra mundum generare non possit.
“Jupiter himself the Greeks want to be named from living or giving life, our people from helping. This, then, they say, is the living substance, which, placed in the upper regions, drawing all things to itself by the force of heat as by the circuit of a brain, and composing them by the moderation of a certain tempering, is said to have begotten from his head wisdom, whom they call Minerva, who is named Athena by the Greeks because of her immortality. Because the father of all made all things through his wisdom, she is said to have been born from his very head, the chief place of all, and is held to have formed and adorned the whole world by the tempered mixture of the elements. So the forms that have been put into matter so that the world might come to be, since they are bound together by the force of heat, are said to be held by the strength of Jupiter. And since these are sufficiently arranged and need nothing new added to them, but each is renewed by the posterity of its own seed, the hands of Saturn are said to have been bound by Jupiter; because time no longer produces anything new from matter, as I said, but the heat of the seeds restores all things according to their kind, and the offspring of Rhea, that is, the propagation of flowing matter, no longer increases. And therefore they call the first division of the elements itself the castration of Saturn, as of one who can no longer generate a world.”
Notes and citation
Summary: The allegorists interpret Jupiter as life-giving heat, Minerva born from his head as divine wisdom, Saturn's binding as the end of new creation, and his castration as the first division of the elements.
- Zeus from ζῆν (“live”); Jupiter from iuvare (“help”); Athena explained as from ἀθάνατος (“immortal”).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR): materize → materiae; ut Ldixi → ut dixi; materia: fluentis → materiae fluentis; tiominant → nominant.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 10.33 (PG 1:1438a–1438b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/10-20/#p-10-33). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-10-33) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
10.34PG 1:1438b–1439a
Nam de Venere hoc modo allegoriam tradunt: Ubi, aiunt, aetheri subjectum est pelagus, cum repercussus aquis splendor caeli gratior refulsisset, venustas rerum quae ex aquis pulchrior apparuerat, Venus nominata est, quae aetheri tanquam fratri suo sociata, quod concupiscibile decus effecerit, Cupidinem genuisse memorata est. Hoc ergo modo per allegoriam Cronum quidem, qui est Saturnus, tempus esse, ut diximus, tradunt, Rheam materiam, Aiden, id est Orcum, inferni profundum, Neptunum aquam, Jovem aerem, id est caloris elementum, Venerem venustatem rerum, Cupidinem concupiscentiam, quae inest rebus omnibus, per quam posteritas reparatur, vel etiam rerum ratio quae sapienter inspecta delectat. Hera, id est Juno, aer iste medius, qui de cmlo usque ad terram descendit, ponitur. Dianam, quam ipsam Proserpinam dicunt, aerem inferne tradunt. Apollinem ipsum etiam solem dicunt, circumeuntem polum; Mercurium verbum. quo ratio de singulis quibusque reddatur; Martem intemperatum ignem, qui cuncta consumat. Sed ne singula enumerando immoremur, ad hanc allegoria: speciem de unoquoque eorum quos colunt, hi quibus secretior de talibus inest peritia, honestas sibi videntur et justas reddere rationes.
“Of Venus they hand down the allegory in this way. When, they say, the sea lay beneath the ether, and the brightness of heaven reflected by the waters shone more pleasingly, the loveliness of things, which appeared more beautiful from the waters, was named Venus; and she, joined to the ether as to her brother, is recorded to have begotten Cupid, because she produced a desirable beauty. In this way, then, by allegory they hand down that Cronus, who is Saturn, is time, as we said; Rhea is matter; Aides, that is Orcus, the depth of the underworld; Neptune, water; Jupiter, the air, that is, the element of heat; Venus, the loveliness of things; Cupid, the desire that is in all things, by which posterity is renewed, or else the reason of things which, wisely contemplated, gives delight. Hera, that is Juno, is set down as this middle air which comes down from heaven to earth. Diana, whom they say is also Proserpina, they hand down as the lower air. Apollo himself they also call the sun, going round the pole; Mercury, the word, by which an account of each thing is given; Mars, intemperate fire, which consumes all things. But not to dwell on listing each, according to this form of allegory those who have more secret skill in such things think they give honorable and just accounts of each of those they worship.”
Notes and citation
Summary: Niceta sets out the allegorists' identifications: Cronus as time, Rhea as matter, Aides as the depth, Neptune as water, Jupiter as ether, Venus as loveliness, Cupid as desire, Juno as air, and so on.
- A column number printed in the text has been removed. “Air” for Jupiter renders the damaged “mlierem” (probably aerem).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR; OCR word join; column number in the text): splendor cmli gratior refulsisset,venustas → splendor caeli gratior refulsisset, venustas; aetheri tanθ quam → aetheri tanquam; Hoc “39 ergo modo → Hoc ergo modo; quiest Saturnus → qui est Saturnus; Jovem mlierem, id est caloris olenientum → Jovem aerem, id est caloris elementum; Dianm, quam → Dianam, quam; Hercurium verbum → Mercurium verbum; intetnperatum → intemperatum; etjustas → et justas.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 10.34 (PG 1:1438b–1439a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/10-20/#p-10-34). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-10-34) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
10.35PG 1:1439a–1439c
Haec cum Niceta dixisset, Aquila respondit: Valde mihi videtur, quisquis ille est auctor et inventor horum, impius exstitisse, si haec quae grata et honesta videntur abscondit, et superstitionis sua: ritum in dedecorosis et turpibus observantiis Collocavit, cum ea quae secundum litteram scripta sunt, manifeste inhonesta sint et turpia, et tota religionis eorum observantia in ipsis constet, ut per hujusmodi scelera et impietates deos suos quos colunt, doceant imitari. Nam in istis allegoriis quae eis utilitas erit? quae quamvis honestae finguntur, nullus tamen ex eis aut usus ad cultum pervenit aut ad mores emendatio
When Niceta had said this, Aquila answered: “It seems to me that whoever is the author and inventor of these things was very impious, if he hid these things that seem pleasing and honorable, and placed the rite of his superstition in disgraceful and shameful observances, since what is written according to the letter is plainly dishonorable and shameful, and the whole observance of their religion consists in these things, so that by such crimes and impieties they teach men to imitate the gods they worship. For what use will these allegories be to them? Though they are made up as honorable, yet no use for worship comes from them, nor any amendment of morals.
Notes and citation
Summary: Aquila objects that if the myths hid honorable meanings their author was impious to clothe them in shameful stories, since pagan worship imitates the literal myths and the allegories reform no one.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR): Valde milii videtur → Valde mihi videtur; auctor ct hinventor horum, impius exstitisse, si haec qua: → auctor et inventor horum, impius exstitisse, si haec quae; dedccorosis → dedecorosis; in ipsrs constet, ut per bujusmodi → in ipsis constet, ut per hujusmodi.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 10.35 (PG 1:1439a–1439c; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/10-20/#p-10-35). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-10-35) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
10.36PG 1:1439c
Unde magis constat, quod prudentes viri cum viderent communem superstitionem tam probrosam esse, tam turpem, nec tamen corrigendi modum aliquem vel scientiam didicissent, quibus potuerunt argumentis et interpretationibus conati sunt res inhonestas honesto sermone velare, et non, ut dicunt. honestas rationes inhonestis fabulis occultare; quod si esset, nunquam utique ipsa eorum simulacra atque ipsae de eis picturae cum suis vitiis et criminibus formarentur. Non cycnus adulter Ledae, nec taurus formaretur Europae, et in mille monstra eum, quem putant meliorem omnibus, verterent. Quod utique si magni et sapientes qui sunt apud eos viri, fictum scirent esse, non verum, nonne impietatis arguerent et sacrilegii eos, qui ad injuriam deorum hujusmodi aut picturam ponerent aut sculperent simulacra? Denique regem temporis sui depingunt in bovis forma, vel anseris, vel formica, vel vulturis, et scribant super regis sui nomen, atque hujusmodi vel statuam vel imaginem collocent; et injuriam facti sentient et vindictae magnitudinem.
“Hence it is rather clear that prudent men, seeing that the common superstition was so disgraceful, so shameful, and yet not having learned any way or knowledge of correcting it, tried by whatever arguments and interpretations they could to veil dishonorable things with honorable words—and not, as they say, to hide honorable reasons in dishonorable fables. If that were so, their images and paintings of them would never be made with their vices and crimes. The swan would not be shaped as Leda's adulterer, nor the bull for Europa, nor would they turn him whom they think better than all into a thousand monsters. If the great and wise men among them knew this was fiction and not truth, would they not convict of impiety and sacrilege those who set up such paintings or carved such images to the insult of the gods? Indeed, let them paint the king of their time in the form of an ox or a goose or an ant or a vulture, write their king's name above it, and set up such a statue or image: they will feel the insult of the deed and the greatness of the vengeance.
Notes and citation
Summary: Aquila argues that the wise used allegory to excuse shameful myths, as shown by the images of Zeus's adulteries that no one would tolerate if made of a living king.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR): ipsa: de eis pictura: → ipsae de eis picturae; adulter Ledte → adulter Ledae; meliorem cinnibus → meliorem omnibus; non verum,nonne → non verum, nonne; liujusmodi → hujusmodi; simulacraYDenique → simulacra? Denique; atquelmjusmodi → atque hujusmodi.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 10.36 (PG 1:1439c; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/10-20/#p-10-36). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-10-36) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
10.37PG 1:1439c–1440a
Sed quoniam vera haec magis sunt, quae publica turpitudo testatur, et ad excusationem a viris prudentibus sermonibus honestis quaesita sunt et concinnata velamina, idcirco non solum non prohibentur, sed et ipsis mysteriis Saturni filios devorantis, et occultati pueri per Corybantum et cymbala et tympanorum sonitus, exprimuntur imagines. De abscisione vero Saturni, quae major erit probatio veritatis, quam ut in honorem dei sui, simili infelicitatis sorte abscindantur etiam cultores? Cum ergo haec manifeste cernantur, quis tam exigui sensus, imo tam stolidi invenietur, cui non palam sit, haec magis vera esse de infelicibus diis, quae infeliciores cultores etiam corporum suorum vulneribus et abscisione testantur?
“But since the things that public shame bears witness to are rather the true ones, and the veils were sought out and composed with honorable words by prudent men for an excuse, therefore they are not only not forbidden, but in the very mysteries images are displayed of Saturn devouring his sons and of the boy hidden by the Corybantes with cymbals and the sound of drums. And as for the castration of Saturn, what greater proof of its truth will there be than that, in honor of their god, the worshipers too are castrated with a like unhappy lot? Since, then, these things are plainly seen, who will be found of so little sense, or rather so stupid, to whom it is not plain that these things are rather true of the unhappy gods, which their more unhappy worshipers attest even by the wounds and mutilation of their bodies?”
Notes and citation
Summary: The mysteries reenact the myths literally, and devotees even castrate themselves, proving that the shameful stories, not the allegories, are what is believed.
- The self-castration of the Galli in the cult of Cybele and Attis.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR; OCR word join): vera lure magis → vera haec magis; qtuPsita → quaesita; sedet ipsis → sed et ipsis; de- tuo vorantis → devorantis.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 10.37 (PG 1:1439c–1440a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/10-20/#p-10-37). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-10-37) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
10.38PG 1:1440a
Quod si, ut dicunt, haec ita honeste et pie gesta tam inhonesto ritu ministrantur et impio, sacrilegus profecto est, quisquis ille vel ex initio haec tradidit, vel nunc male tradita persistit implere. Quid autem et de libris dicimus poetarum? Nonne oportuerat eos, si honesta et pia deorum gesta turpibus fabulis infamarunt, abjici protinus atque in ignem dari, ne persuaderent tenera: adhuc aetati puerorum, Jovem ipsum deorum principem. parricidam erga parentes, incestum erga sorores et filias, impurum etiam in pueros exstitisse, Venerem cum Marte adulteros, et omnia illa quae jam superius dicta sunt? Aut quid tibi videtur, domine mi Petre?
“But if, as they say, these things were done so honorably and piously, and are served by so dishonorable and impious a rite, then surely he is sacrilegious, whoever handed them down from the beginning or still persists in carrying out what was wrongly handed down. And what shall we say of the books of the poets? If they defamed the honorable and pious deeds of the gods with shameful fables, ought they not at once to have been cast away and given to the fire, so that they might not persuade the still tender age of boys that Jupiter himself, the chief of the gods, was a parricide toward his parents, incestuous toward his sisters and daughters, impure even toward boys, that Venus and Mars were adulterers, and all those things already mentioned above? Or what do you think, my lord Peter?”
Notes and citation
Summary: Aquila argues that if the myths really defame noble deeds, the poets' books ought to have been burned rather than taught to boys.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR; stray mark): Quod si, 'ut dicunt. haec → Quod si, ut dicunt, haec; ministrantnret impio → ministrantur et impio; poetarum?- Nonne → poetarum? Nonne; jam smerius dicta → jam superius dicta; domine lltl Putre → domine mi Petre.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 10.38 (PG 1:1440a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/10-20/#p-10-38). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-10-38) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
10.39PG 1:1440a–1440c
Tunc ille respondit: Certus esto, dulcissime Aquila, quia omnia per bonam Dei providentiam gesta sunt, ut non solum infirma et fragilis, Verum et turpis esset causa quae futura erat contraria veritati. Si enim validior et verisimilior fuisset erroris assertio, haud facile quisquam qui in eo deceptus esset, ad iter veritatis rediret. Si enim nunc, cum tam multa probra et dedecora de diis gentium proferuntur, vix aliquis turpem derelinquit errorem, quanto magis si esset ibi aliquid honestum et verisimile? Difficulter namque transfertur animus ab his, in quibus a prima aetate praeventus est; et ob hoc, ut dixi, divina Providentia factum est ut erroris substantia et infirma esset et turpis. Sed et caetera omnia simili modo competenter et commode dispensat divina Providentia. licet nobis ignorantibus rerum causas bonae et optimae dispensationis divinae non liqueat ratio.
Then he answered: “Be sure, sweetest Aquila, that all things have been done by the good providence of God, so that the cause which was to be contrary to the truth should be not only weak and frail but also shameful. For if the assertion of error had been stronger and more plausible, hardly anyone deceived by it would easily return to the road of truth. For if now, when so many disgraces and shames are brought forward about the gods of the Gentiles, scarcely anyone abandons the shameful error, how much less if there were something honorable and plausible in it? For the mind is with difficulty moved from things with which it has been preoccupied from earliest age; and for this reason, as I said, it came about by divine providence that the substance of error should be both weak and shameful. And divine Providence arranges all other things likewise fittingly and suitably, though the reason of the good and excellent divine dispensation is not clear to us who do not know the causes of things.”
Notes and citation
Summary: Peter explains that Providence allowed error to be weak and shameful, since a plausible error would be harder to abandon.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR): providentiam gcsta → providentiam gesta; rediret.Si enim → rediret. Si enim; dere- Iinquit → derelinquit; Difliculter → Difficulter; prima aelate → prima aetate; compctenter ct commode → competenter et commode; bona: etoptinne → bonae et optimae.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 10.39 (PG 1:1440a–1440c; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/10-20/#p-10-39). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-10-39) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
10.40PG 1:1440c
Cum haec Petrus dixisset, ego Clemens Nicetam rogabam, ut aliqua de allegoriis gentilium quas diligenter attigerat, agnoscendi gratia exponeret; utile enim est, ut quando cum gentilibus disputamus, etiam ista nos minime lateant. Et Niceta: Si, inquit, permittit dominus meus Petrus, possunt dicere. Tum Petrus: Hodie, inquit, permisi vobis dicere adversum gentiles, ut nostis. Et Niceta ait: Dic ergo, Clemens, de quibus audire velis. Cui ego aio: Quomodo tradunt de deorum cena gentiles, quam in Pelei nuptiis habuerunt et Thetidis, quem dicunt esse Paridem pastorem, et quas ponunt Junonem, Minervam et Venerem, quae. apud eum judicantur, quemve Mercurium, vel quod malum, et caetera quae per ordinem consequuntur.
When Peter had said this, I, Clement, asked Niceta to set out, for the sake of knowledge, some of the allegories of the Gentiles, which he had carefully studied; for it is useful that, when we dispute with the Gentiles, these things too should not be unknown to us. Niceta said: “If my lord Peter permits, I can speak.” Then Peter said: “Today I have permitted you to speak against the Gentiles, as you know.” And Niceta said: “Tell me, then, Clement, what you wish to hear about.” I said to him: “How do the Gentiles explain the banquet of the gods which they held at the wedding of Peleus and Thetis; whom do they say the shepherd Paris is; whom do they make Juno, Minerva, and Venus, who were judged before him; whom Mercury, or what the apple, and the rest that follows in order?”
Notes and citation
Summary: Clement asks Niceta to explain the pagan allegory of the gods' banquet at the wedding of Peleus and Thetis and the judgment of Paris.
- A few marks at the end of the chapter in the scan (the start of Niceta's answer, lost at the page break) have been removed; see 10.41.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR; OCR word join; OCR, stray marks): Nicctam → Nicetam; gentilibusdisputamus → gentilibus disputamus; Hodie, tinquit. permisi → Hodie, inquit, permisi; Cui ego aio ξ’ Quomodo → Cui ego aio: Quomodo; ccena gentiles. quam → cena gentiles, quam; ponuntJunonem → ponunt Junonem; et mtera quae per ordinem consequuntur. 91‘3"" → et caetera quae per ordinem consequuntur..
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 10.40 (PG 1:1440c; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/10-20/#p-10-40). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-10-40) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
10.41PG 1:1441a–1441b
modo se habet. Convivium mundum tradunt, discumbendi ordinem deorum stellarum positionem; quos Hesiodus cceli et terrae primos filios nominat, in quibus sex mares et sex feminas ad duodecim signorum numerum referunt, quae universum circumeunt mundum. 'Dapes autem convivii rationes esse et causas rerum tradunt dulces et concupiscibiles, quae qualiter regatur et gubernetur hic mundus, ex signorum positione et astrorum cursibus colliguntur. Ad libertatis tamen convivii modum dicunt ista constare, pro eo quod potestatem habeat uniuscujusque sensus, si velit degustare aliquid ex hujusmodi scientia aut si nolit; et sicut in convivio nemo cogitur, sed vescendi libertas penes unumquemque est, ita et philosophandi ratio pendet in voluntatis arbitrio. Discordiam concupiscentiam carnis dicunt, quae insurgit adversum propositum mentis et philosophandi impedit studium; ideo denique et tempus illud esse aiunt, in quo de nuptiis agitur. Peleum vero et Thetidem nympham, aridum et humidum ponunt elementum, ex quorum admistione substantia corporum constat. Mercurium verbum esse tradunt, per quod sensui doctrina confertur, Junonem pudicitiam, Minervam fortitudinem, Venerem libidinem dicunt, Paridem sensum. Si ergo, aiunt, accidat in homine barbarum esse et imperitum sensum, et rectum judicium nescientem, spreta pudicitia et virtute, libidini palmam, quod est malum, dabit, per quod non solum sibi, sed et civibus et universae genti subversio et pernicies aderit. Haec ergo licet illis componere ex qualibet materia visum sit, tamen aptari ad omnem hominem possunt, quia si quis pastoralem et rusticum atque imperitum habeat sensum nec velit erudiri, ubi corporis calor de libidinis suavitate suggesserit, continuo, spretis studiorum virtutibus et scientiae bonis, ad voluptates corporis animum confert. Et hinc est unde impacata bella consurgunt, urbes ruunt, patria: concidunt, sicut et Paris, rapta Helena, ad mutuum Graecos et barbaros armavit exitium.
Then Niceta said: “The matter of the banquet stands in this way. They hand down that the banquet is the world, and the order of the gods reclining is the position of the stars; those whom Hesiod names the first children of heaven and earth, among whom there are six males and six females, they refer to the number of the twelve signs, which go round the whole world. The dishes of the banquet they hand down to be the reasons and causes of things, sweet and desirable, which are gathered from the position of the signs and the courses of the stars, as to how this world is ruled and governed. They say that these things are set out in the manner of the freedom of a banquet, because each mind has the power to taste something of this knowledge if it wishes, or not; and as at a banquet no one is compelled but each has freedom to eat, so the practice of philosophizing depends on the choice of the will. Discord they say is the desire of the flesh, which rises up against the purpose of the mind and hinders the pursuit of philosophizing; and that, indeed, is why they say it was the time when a wedding was being celebrated. Peleus and the nymph Thetis they set down as the dry and moist element, from whose mixture the substance of bodies is composed. Mercury they hand down to be the word, through which teaching is conferred on the mind; Juno they call chastity, Minerva fortitude, Venus lust, Paris the mind. If, then, they say, it happens that a man's mind is barbarous and unskilled, and does not know right judgment, despising chastity and virtue it will give the palm to lust—which is the evil—through which overthrow and ruin will come not only to himself but to his fellow citizens and the whole nation. Though they have chosen to compose these things from whatever material, they can be applied to every man: for if someone has a shepherd's and rustic and unskilled mind and does not wish to be educated, when the heat of the body suggests the sweetness of lust, at once, despising the virtues of study and the goods of knowledge, he turns his mind to the pleasures of the body. And from this it is that implacable wars arise, cities fall, countries collapse, just as Paris, by carrying off Helen, armed Greeks and barbarians for mutual destruction.”
Notes and citation
Summary: Niceta explains the allegory: the banquet is the world, Peleus and Thetis the dry and moist elements, Juno, Minerva, and Venus chastity, courage, and lust, and Paris the untrained mind that chooses lust and brings ruin.
- The opening words of the chapter are lost at the page break in the scan; “Then Niceta said: ‘The matter of the banquet stands’” is supplied by sense from the surviving “…modo se habet”. Hesiod, Theog. 133–138.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR): pliilOSOphandi → philosophandi; llaec ergo licet → Haec ergo licet; possunt,quia → possunt, quia; rapta Ilelena, ad mutuum Graecos et barbaros armavit exitibm → rapta Helena, ad mutuum Graecos et barbaros armavit exitium.
Extrabiblical texts: Hesiod, Theog. 133–138 (Hesiod, Theogony; allusion)
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 10.41 (PG 1:1441a–1441b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/10-20/#p-10-41). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-10-41) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
10.42PG 1:1441b–1442a
Et Petrus, collaudans prosecutionem ejus, ait: Multas, ut video, ingeniosi homines ex his quae legunt verisimilitudines capiunt, et ideo diligenter observandum est, ut lex Dei cum legitur, non secundum proprii ingenii intelligentiam legatur. Sunt enim multa verba in Scripturis divinis, quae possunt trahi ad eum sensum, quem sibi unusquisque sponte praesumpsit; quod fieri non oportet. Non enim sensum quem extrinsecus attuleris alienum et extraneum debes quaerere, quem ex Scripturarum auctoritate confirmes, sed ex ipsis Scripturis sensum capere veritatis; et ideo oportet ab eo intelligentiam discere Scripturarum, qui eam a majoribus secundum veritatem sibi traditam servat, ut et ipse possit ea quae recte suscepit, competenter asserere. Cum enim ex divinis Scripturis integram quis susceperit et firmam regulam veritatis, absurdum non erit, si aliquid etiam ex eruditione communi ac de liberalibus studiis, quae forte in pueritia attigit, ad assertionem veri dogmatis conferat. ita tamen ut ubi vera didicit, falsa et simulata declinet.
Peter, praising his exposition, said: “Clever men, as I see, draw many plausibilities from what they read; and therefore we must be careful that when the law of God is read, it is not read according to the understanding of one's own cleverness. For there are many words in the divine Scriptures which can be drawn to whatever sense each one has presumed for himself; and this ought not to be done. For you ought not to seek a foreign and alien sense brought in from outside, which you then confirm by the authority of the Scriptures, but to take the sense of truth from the Scriptures themselves. And therefore one must learn the understanding of the Scriptures from him who keeps it as handed down to him from his elders according to the truth, so that he too may fittingly assert what he has rightly received. For when someone has received from the divine Scriptures a whole and firm rule of truth, it will not be absurd if he also brings something from common education and the liberal studies, which he perhaps touched in boyhood, to the assertion of true doctrine—yet in such a way that where he has learned the truth, he avoids what is false and feigned.”
2 Pet 1:20 (echo, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Peter warns that Scripture, like the myths, can be twisted by clever readers, so its sense must be learned from those who keep the tradition received from their elders, with liberal learning used only in support of the truth.
- The principle that Scripture be interpreted according to tradition received from the elders is characteristic of the Pseudo-Clementines (compare the Letter of Peter to James 1–3; Homilies 2.38–40).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR): Petrus,collaudans → Petrus, collaudans; communi ae de liberalibus → communi ac de liberalibus; ubi veru didicit → ubi vera didicit.
Topics: Scripture and canon, Heresy
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 10.42 (PG 1:1441b–1442a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/10-20/#p-10-42). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-10-42) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
10.43PG 1:1442a–1442b
Et cum hare dixisset, ad patrem nostrum respiciens, ait: Tu ergo, senex, si quidem saluti animae tuae consulis, ut cum corpore fuerit resoluta, pro brevi hac conversione requiem inveniat sempiternam, require de quibusvis et consule, ut possis si quid in te est dubitationis abjicere. Incertum enim est etiam juvenibus vitae tempus, senibus autem jam nec incertum est; non enim dubitatur, quin quantumcunque est quod putatur superesse, breve sit. Et ideo tam juvenes quam senes Oportet de conversione et poenitentia valde esse sollicitos, et satagere ut de reliquo ornent animam suam ornamentis dignissimis, id est dogmatibus veritatis, decore pudicitiae, splendore justitiae, candore pietatis, aliisque omnibus quibus comptam decet esse rationabilem mentem; tum praeterea declinare a consortiis inhonestis et infidelibus, et societates habere fidelium atque illos frequentare conventus, in quibus de pudicitia, de justitia, de pietate tractatur; orare semper Deum ex corde et ab ipso petere quae decet a Deo posci; ipsi gratias agere, veram paenitudinem gerere praeteritorum gestorum; aliquantulum etiam, si possibile est, per misericordias pauperum juvare paenitentiam; per haec enim facilior venia dabitur et indulgenti citius indulgebitur.
And when he had said this, looking at our father, he said: “You, then, old man, if you care for the salvation of your soul, that when it is released from the body it may find everlasting rest in return for this brief conversion, inquire about whatever you wish and consult, so that you may cast off any doubt that is in you. For the time of life is uncertain even for the young, but for the old it is no longer even uncertain; for there is no doubt that however much is thought to remain is short. And therefore both young and old must be very anxious about conversion and repentance, and strive thereafter to adorn their soul with the worthiest ornaments, that is, with the doctrines of truth, the beauty of chastity, the splendor of justice, the brightness of piety, and all the other things with which it befits a rational mind to be adorned; and besides, to avoid dishonorable and unbelieving company, and to keep the society of believers and frequent those assemblies in which chastity, justice, and piety are discussed; to pray to God always from the heart and ask of him what it is fitting to ask of God; to give him thanks, to have true repentance for past deeds; and also, if possible, to help repentance somewhat by mercies to the poor. For through these, pardon will be given more easily, and he who has been indulgent will be indulged more quickly.”
Matt 5:7 (echo, medium confidence) · Dan 4:27 (echo, low confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Peter urges Faustinianus, given the shortness of life, to repent, adorn his soul with virtue, keep the company of believers, pray, and help his repentance by almsgiving.
- Almsgiving as aid to repentance: compare Dan 4:27 and Tob 12:9; Matt 5:7.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR; OCR word join): estquod → est quod; praetcrea → praeterea; per haec enirn → per haec enim.
Extrabiblical texts: Tob 12:9 (Tobit [in RC, EO, ETH canons]; echo)
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 10.43 (PG 1:1442a–1442b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/10-20/#p-10-43). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-10-43) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
10.44PG 1:1442b–1442d
Quod si provectioris aetatis sit is qui ad paenitentiam venit, eo magis gratias agere debet Deo, quod postquam fractus est omnis impetus concupiscentia carnalis, scientia veritatis accepta, nulla ei imminet pugna certaminis, per quam insurgentes adversus animum reprimat corporis voluptates. Superest ergo in agnitione veritatis et misericordia: operibus exerceri, ut afferat fructus dignos pmnitentiae, nec putet quia in temporis longitudine documentum conversionis ostenditur, et non in devotionis ac propositi firmitate. Deo enim manifesta: sunt mentes, qui non temporum rationem colligit, sed animorum: ipse enim probat, si quis agnita veritatis praedicatione non distulit neque tempus negligenda consumpsit, sed statim et si dici potest eodem momento, praeterita perhorrescens, futurorum desiderium coepit et in amorem regni caelestis exarsit.
“And if he who comes to repentance is of more advanced age, he ought all the more to give thanks to God that, since every impulse of carnal desire has been broken, having received the knowledge of truth, no battle of the contest threatens him by which he must repress the pleasures of the body rising up against the mind. It remains, then, for him to be exercised in the knowledge of truth and in works of mercy, so that he may bring forth fruits worthy of repentance; and let him not think that the proof of conversion is shown in length of time, and not in the firmness of devotion and purpose. For minds are manifest to God, who reckons not the account of times but of souls. For he approves if someone, having recognized the preaching of truth, has not delayed nor spent time in neglect, but at once, and if it can be said in the same moment, shuddering at the past, has begun to desire the things to come and burned with love of the heavenly kingdom.
Matt 3:8 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: An older convert should be grateful that desire has waned, and should devote himself to knowledge and mercy, for God values the firmness of conversion, not its length.
- Matt 3:8 (Luke 3:8).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR): ad pcenitentiam venit → ad paenitentiam venit; iusurgentcs → insurgentes; prmdicatione → praedicatione; desiderium erepit → desiderium coepit.
Topics: Ethics
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 10.44 (PG 1:1442b–1442d; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/10-20/#p-10-44). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-10-44) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
10.45PG 1:1442d–1443a
Propter quod nemo vestrum ultra dissimulet nec retro respiciat, sed ad Evangelium regni Dei libenter accedat. Non dicat pauper, quia cum dives factus fuero, tunc convertar; non requirit a te Deus pecuniam, sed animum misericordem et piam mentem. Neque dives conversionem suam differat pro sollicitudine saeculari, dum cogitat quomodo dispenset abundantiam frugum; neque dicat intra semetipsum, Quid faciam, ubi recondam fructus meos? Neque dicat animae suae, Habes multa bona reposita in annos multos, epulare, laetare; nam dicetur ei: Stulte, hac nocte auferetur a te anima tua, et quae praeparasti cujus erunt? Itaque festinet ad paenitentiam omnis aetas, omnis sexus, omnisque conditio, ut vitam consequatur aeternam. Iuvenes quidem in eo grati sint, quod in ipso impetu desideriorum cervices suas jugo subjiciunt disciplinae. Senes et ipsi laudabiles, quia multi temporis consuetudinem, in qua male praeventi sunt, pro Dei timore commutant.
“Therefore let none of you any longer pretend or look back, but come gladly to the gospel of the kingdom of God. Let not the poor man say: ‘When I have become rich, then I will be converted.’ God does not require money of you, but a merciful spirit and a pious mind. Nor let the rich man put off his conversion because of worldly anxiety, while he considers how to dispose of the abundance of his crops; nor let him say within himself, ‘What shall I do, where shall I store my fruits?’ Nor let him say to his soul, ‘You have many goods laid up for many years; feast, be merry’; for it will be said to him: ‘Fool, this night your soul will be taken from you, and what you have prepared, whose will it be?’ So let every age, every sex, every condition hasten to repentance, so that they may obtain eternal life. Let the young be pleasing in this, that in the very rush of desires they submit their necks to the yoke of discipline. The old too are praiseworthy, because for the fear of God they change the habit of a long time in which they had been wrongly occupied.
Luke 12:17 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 12:19 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 12:20 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 9:62 (echo, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Peter urges rich and poor, young and old, to turn to the gospel without delay, citing the parable of the rich fool.
- Luke 9:62; Luke 12:17–20.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR): Neque dicat anima: sua:, Habes ntulta bona reposita in annos multo:, epulare, laztarc → Neque dicat animae suae, Habes multa bona reposita in annos multos, epulare, laetare; auferetur ab: anima → auferetur a te anima; quia pmparasti cujus erunt "?ltaqne fcstinet ad pmnitentiam → quae praeparasti cujus erunt? Itaque festinet ad paenitentiam; vitam consequatur mternam → vitam consequatur aeternam; jugo subjiciunt disciplinze → jugo subjiciunt disciplinae; male prmventi → male praeventi.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 10.45 (PG 1:1442d–1443a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/10-20/#p-10-45). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-10-45) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).
10.46PG 1:1443a
Nemo ergo differat, nemo cunctetur; quae enim causa cunctandi est ad bene agendum? aut times, ne cum bene feceris, ibi remunerationem non invenias ut putasti? Et quid senties detrimenti si bene feceris gratis, nonne etiam sola in his sufficeret conscientia? Quod si inveneris ut praesumis, nonne pro parvis magna, et pro temporalibus aeterna recipies? verum ego haec propter incredulos dixi. Nos autem quae praedicamus, ita se habent, quia nec aliter esse possunt, quae prophetica voce promissa sunt.
“Let no one, then, delay, let no one hesitate; for what cause is there for hesitating to do well? Or do you fear that when you have done well, you may not find the reward there as you thought? And what loss will you feel if you have done well for nothing? Would not conscience alone suffice in these things? But if you find it as you presume, will you not receive great things for small, and eternal for temporal? But I have said this for the sake of unbelievers. What we preach is so, for the things promised by the prophetic voice cannot be otherwise.
Notes and citation
Summary: There is no reason to delay doing good: even without reward a good conscience suffices, and if the promise is true one gains eternal goods for small ones.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR): dill‘erat → differat; qua: enim causa → quae enim causa; snl‘liceret → sufficeret; acterna → aeterna; Nos autem quas pradicamus → Nos autem quae praedicamus.
Cite (SBL): Ps.-Clem. Recogn. 10.46 (PG 1:1443a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/ps-clem-recognitions/10-20/#p-10-46). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-ps-clem-recognitions-10-46) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from Rufinus's Latin (Migne PG 1, from the library scan's OCR, slips corrected as logged); each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation of T. Smith in ANF 8 (1886).