Dialogues 2.4–3.3
Latin text: Halm, CSEL 1 (Latin text: Karl Halm (CSEL 1, 1866), digitized by Open Greek and Latin, University of Leipzig (csel-dev), CC BY-SA 4.0).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0). Compare: Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, series 2, vol. 11 (1894).
Chapter 2
2.4CSEL 1:184–186
Illud autem animaduerti saepe, Sulpici, Martinum tibi dicere solitum, nequaquam sibi in episcopatu eam uirtutum gratiam suppetisse, quam prius se habuisse meminisset. quod si uerum est, immo quia uerum est, conicere possumus, quanta fuerint illa, quae monachus operatus est et quae teste nullo solus exercuit, cum tanta illum in episcopatu signa fecisse sub oculis omnium uiderimus. multa quidem illius prius gesta innotuere mundo neque potuere celari, sed innumerabilia esse dicuntur, quae dum iactantiam uitat, occuluit neque in hominum notitiam passus est peruenire, quippe qui humanam substantiam supergressus, uirtutis suae conscientia mundi gloriam calcans, caelo teste frueretur. quod uerum esse uel ex his, quae conperta nobis sunt nec latere potuerunt, possumus aestimare, siquidem ante episcopatum duos mortuos uitae restituerit, quod liber tuus plenius est locutus, in episcopatu uero, quod praetermisisse te miror, unum tantummodo suscitarit. cuius rei ego testis sum, si tamen nihil de idoneo teste dubitatis. id ipsum autem uobis, qualiter gestum sit, explicabo. fuerat causa nescio qua Carnotum oppidum petebamus. interea, dum uicum quendam habitantium multitudine frequentissimum praeterimus, obuiam nobis inmanis turba processit, quae erat tota gentilium: nam nemo in illo uico nouerat Christianum. uerum ad famam tanti uiri campos omnes late patentes confluentium multitudo contexerat. sensit Martinus operandum et adnuntiante sibi spiritu totus infremuit, nec mortale sonans uerbum Dei gentilibus praedicabat, saepius ingemescens, cur tanta Dominum Saluatorem turba nesciret. interea, sicut nos incredibilis circumdederat multitudo, mulier quaedam, cuius filius paullo ante defecerat, corpus exanime beato uiro protensis manibus coepit offerre dicens: scimus quia amicus Dei es: restitue mihi filium meum, quia unicus mihi est. iunxit se cetera multitudo et matris precibus adclamabat. tum Martinus uidens pro expectantium salute, ut postea nobis ipse dicebat, consequi se posse uirtutem, defuncti corpus propriis manibus accepit: et cum spectantibus cunctis genua flexisset, ubi consummata oratione surrexit, uiuificatum paruolum matri reddidit. tum uero multitudo omnis in caelum clamore sublato Christum Deum fateri, postremo cuncti cateruatim ad genua beati uiri ruere coeperunt, fideliter postulantes ut eos faceret Christianos. nec cunctatus, in medio ut erant campo, cunctos inposita uniuersis manu catechumenos fecit, cum quidem ad nos conuersus diceret, non inrationabiliter in campo catechumenos fieri, ubi solerent martyres consecrari.
“I have often noticed, Sulpicius, that Martin used to tell you that he by no means had the same grace of miracles as bishop that he remembered having had before. If this is true, or rather since it is true, we can guess how great were the things he did as a monk and did alone with no witness, since we have seen him work such great signs as bishop before the eyes of all. Many of his earlier deeds indeed became known to the world and could not be hidden; but innumerable are said to be the things which, avoiding boasting, he concealed and did not allow to come to people’s knowledge, since, having risen above human nature, trampling the world’s glory in the consciousness of his power, he was content with heaven as his witness. That this is true we can estimate even from the things we have learned and that could not be hidden: before his episcopate he restored two dead men to life, as your book has told more fully; but as bishop, which I am surprised you omitted, he raised only one. Of this I am a witness, if indeed you have no doubt of a suitable witness. How it happened I will explain to you. For some reason or other we were making for the town of Chartres. Meanwhile, as we were passing a village very crowded with inhabitants, a huge crowd came out to meet us, all of them pagans; for no one in that village knew a Christian. But at the fame of so great a man the multitude flocking together had covered all the widely spreading fields. Martin sensed that there was work to be done, and, as the Spirit announced it to him, he was wholly stirred, and, with no mortal sound, preached the word of God to the pagans, groaning often that so great a crowd did not know the Lord the Savior. Meanwhile, as the incredible multitude surrounded us, a certain woman, whose son had died shortly before, began to offer the lifeless body to the blessed man with outstretched hands, saying: ‘We know that you are a friend of God: restore my son to me, for he is my only one.’ The rest of the multitude joined her and added their cries to the mother’s prayers. Then Martin, seeing, as he himself afterward told us, that he could obtain the miracle for the salvation of those who were waiting, took the dead body in his own hands; and when he had knelt in the sight of all and had finished his prayer and risen, he gave the little one back to his mother alive. Then indeed the whole multitude, raising a shout to heaven, confessed Christ as God, and at last all began to rush in throngs to the blessed man’s knees, faithfully asking him to make them Christians. Without hesitation, in the middle of the field as they were, he laid his hand on them all and made them all catechumens, saying, as he turned to us, that it was not unreasonable for catechumens to be made in a field, where martyrs used to be consecrated.
Luke 7:12 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: As bishop Martin raised a dead boy in a pagan village near Chartres, and the whole crowd became catechumens on the spot.
- Carnotum is Chartres. Martin’s two earlier raisings are in Life of Martin 7–8. Allusion: Luke 7:12.
Extrabiblical texts: Sulpicius Severus, V. Mart. 7–8 (Life of Saint Martin; allusion)
Topics: Baptism
Cite (SBL): Sulpicius Severus, Dial. 2.4 (CSEL 1:184–186; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/sulpicius-dialogi/2-4/#p-2-4). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-sulpicius-dialogi-2-4) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Halm, CSEL 1 (1866; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged; Halm's bracketed deletions left out and noted), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF² 11 (Roberts, 1894); differences checked against the Latin.
2.5CSEL 1:186–187
Vicisti, inquit Postumianus, Galle, uicisti, non utique me, qui Martini sum potius adsertor et qui haec omnia de illo uiro et sciui semper et credidi, sed eremitas omnes anachoretasque uicisti. nemo enim illorum, sicut Martinus hic uester, immo noster, mortibus imperauit. meritoque hunc iste Sulpicius apostolis conparat et prophetis, quem per omnia illis esse consimilem fidei uirtus ac uirtutum opera testantur. sed perge quaeso, quamquam nihil magnificentius audire possimus, perge tamen, Galle, quod etiam nunc de Martino superest sermonis euoluere. nam etiam minima illius et cotidiana animus festinat agnoscere, quia minima illius aliorum maximis maiora esse non dubium est. Ita faciam, Gallus inquit: uerum id, quod dicturus sum, ipse non uidi, prius enim gestum est, quam me illi uiro iungerem: sed factum celebre est, fidelium fratrum, qui interfuerant, sermone uulgatum. eo fere tempore, quo primum episcopus datus est, fuit ei necessitas adire comitatum. Valentinianus tum maior rerum potiebatur. hic cum Martinum ea petere cognouisset, quae praestare nolebat, iussit eum palatii foribus arceri: etenim ad animum illius inmitem ac superbum uxor accesserat Arriana, quae totum illum a sancto uiro, ne ei debitam reuerentiam praestaret, auerterat. itaque Martinus, ubi semel adque iterum superbum principem adire temptauit, recurrit ad nota praesidia: cilicio obuoluitur, cinere conspergitur, cibo potuque abstinet, orationem noctibus diebusque perpetuat. septimo die adsistit ei angelus: iubet eum ad palatium ire securum, regias fores quamlibet clausas sponte reserandas, imperatoris spiritum superbum molliendum. igitur istiusmodi praesentis angeli confirmatus adloquio et fretus auxilio palatium petit. patent limina, nullus obsistit: postremo usque ad regem nemine prohibente peruenit. qui cum uenientem eminus uideret, frendens cur fuisset admissus, nequaquam adsurgere est dignatus adstanti, donec regiam sellam ignis operiret ipsumque regem ea parte corporis, qua sedebat, adflaret incendium. ita e solio suo superbus excutitur et Martino inuitus adsurgit: multumque conplexus quem spernere ante decreuerat, uirtutem sensisse diuinam emendatior fatebatur: nec expectatis Martini precibus prius omnia praestitit quam rogaretur. conloquio illum adque conuiuio frequenter adsciuit: postremo abeunti multa munera obtulit, quae uir beatus, ut semper, paupertatis suae custos cuncta reiecit.
“You have conquered, Gallus,” said Postumianus, “you have conquered: not me, indeed, who am rather a champion of Martin and have always known and believed all these things about that man, but you have conquered all the hermits and anchorites. For none of them, like this Martin of yours, or rather of ours, has commanded death. And rightly does Sulpicius here compare him with the apostles and prophets, since the power of his faith and the works of his miracles testify that he is like them in all things. But go on, I beg you; though we could hear nothing more magnificent, yet go on, Gallus, to unfold what still remains to be told of Martin. For my mind is eager to learn even his least and everyday deeds, because there is no doubt that his least deeds are greater than the greatest of others.” “I will do so,” said Gallus; “but what I am going to tell I did not see myself, for it happened before I joined that man; but the deed is famous, spread abroad by the account of faithful brothers who were present. At about the time when he was first made bishop, he had need to go to the court. Valentinian the elder was then in power. When he learned that Martin was seeking things he did not wish to grant, he ordered him to be kept from the doors of the palace; for to his harsh and proud mind had been added an Arian wife, who had turned him wholly against the holy man, so that he would not pay him due reverence. So Martin, having tried once and again to approach the proud emperor, had recourse to his familiar defenses: he wrapped himself in sackcloth, sprinkled himself with ashes, abstained from food and drink, and prayed continuously night and day. On the seventh day an angel stood by him and told him to go to the palace without fear: the royal doors, however closed, would be opened of their own accord, and the emperor’s proud spirit would be softened. Strengthened, then, by the words of the angel present with him and relying on his help, he made for the palace. The thresholds stand open; no one resists him; at last he comes right up to the king with no one stopping him. When the emperor saw him coming from afar, gnashing his teeth that he had been let in, he did not deign to rise for him as he stood there, until fire covered the royal seat and the flames scorched the king himself in that part of his body on which he was sitting. So the proud man was shaken from his throne and rose for Martin against his will; and embracing warmly the man he had earlier resolved to despise, he confessed, now reformed, that he had felt divine power; and without waiting for Martin’s requests he granted everything before he was asked. He often invited him to conversation and to his table; finally, when he was leaving, he offered him many gifts, all of which the blessed man, guardian of his poverty as always, refused.
Notes and citation
Summary: Valentinian I, influenced by his Arian wife, refused to see Martin; after fasting and prayer Martin entered the palace, and fire under the throne forced the emperor to rise and grant his requests.
- Valentinian I reigned 364–375; his Arian wife is probably Justina.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip): postremo; abeunti → postremo abeunti.
Topics: Heresy, Fasting, Prayer
Cite (SBL): Sulpicius Severus, Dial. 2.5 (CSEL 1:186–187; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/sulpicius-dialogi/2-4/#p-2-5). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-sulpicius-dialogi-2-5) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Halm, CSEL 1 (1866; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged; Halm's bracketed deletions left out and noted), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF² 11 (Roberts, 1894); differences checked against the Latin.
2.6CSEL 1:187–188
Et quia palatium semel ingressi sumus, licet diuersis in palatio temporibus gesta conectam: nequaquam enim praetermittendum uidetur circa Martini admirationem reginae fidelis exemplum. Maximus imperator rempublicam gubernabat, uir omni uita merito praedicandus, si ei uel diadema non legitime tumultuante milite inpositum repudiare uel armis ciuilibus abstinere licuisset: sed magnum imperium nec sine periculo renui nec sine armis potuit retineri. hic Martinum saepius euocatum receptumque intra palatium uenerabiliter honorabat: totus illi cum eo sermo de praesentibus, de futuris, de fidelium gloria, de aeternitate sanctorum, cum interim diebus ac noctibus de ore Martini regina pendebat: euangelico illo non inferior exemplo pedes sancti fletu rigabat, crine tergebat. Martinus, quem nulla umquam femina contigisset, istius adsiduitatem, immo potius seruitutem non poterat euadere. non illa opes regni, non imperii dignitatem, non diadema, non purpuram cogitabat: diuelli a Martini pedibus solo strata non poterat. postremo uiro suo poscit, dicens Martinum uterque conpellant, ut ei remotis omnibus ministris praeberet sola conuiuium. nec potuit uir beatus obstinatius reluctari. conponitur castus reginae manibus apparatus: sellulam ipsa consternit, mensam admouet, aquam manibus subministrat, cibum, quem ipsa coxerat, adponit. ipsa illo edente eminus secundum famulantium disciplinam solo fixa consistit inmobilis, per omnia ministrantis modestiam et humilitatem exhibens seruientis: miscuit ipsa bibituro et ipsa porrexit. finita cenula fragmenta panis absumpti micasque collegit, satis fideliter illas reliquias imperialibus epulis anteponens. beata mulier, tantae pietatis adfectu illi merito conparanda, quae uenit a finibus terrae audire Salomonem, siquidem simplicem sequamur historiam. sed fides reginarum est conferenda, quod mihi liceat separata mysterii maiestate dixisse: illa expetiit audire sapientem, ista non tantum audisse contenta meruit seruire sapienti.
“And since we have once entered the palace, I will join together things done in the palace at different times; for the example of a faithful queen in her admiration for Martin should by no means be passed over. The emperor Maximus was ruling the state, a man deserving praise for his whole life, if he had been allowed either to refuse the diadem placed on him illegally by a rebellious army or to abstain from civil war; but a great empire could not be refused without danger nor kept without arms. He often summoned Martin, received him in the palace, and honored him with reverence; all his talk with him was of things present and to come, of the glory of the faithful, of the eternity of the saints; meanwhile, day and night, the queen hung on Martin’s lips: not inferior to that gospel example, she watered the saint’s feet with tears and wiped them with her hair. Martin, whom no woman had ever touched, could not escape her constant attendance, or rather her servitude. She thought not of the riches of the kingdom, not of the dignity of the empire, not of the diadem, not of the purple: lying on the ground, she could not be torn from Martin’s feet. At last she asked her husband that they should both press Martin to let her alone, all servants removed, give him a meal. And the blessed man could not resist any longer. A chaste meal is prepared by the queen’s hands: she herself spreads his stool, brings up the table, gives him water for his hands, sets before him food she had cooked herself. While he ate, she stood at a distance, fixed motionless to the ground after the manner of servants, showing in everything the modesty of one who serves and the humility of a servant; she herself mixed his drink and handed it to him. When the little meal was over, she gathered the fragments and crumbs of the bread he had eaten, faithfully preferring those leftovers to imperial banquets. Blessed woman, who for the devotion of such piety may rightly be compared with her who came from the ends of the earth to hear Solomon, if we follow the simple history. But the faith of the two queens is to be compared (I may say this setting aside the majesty of the mystery): that one sought to hear a wise man; this one, not content only to have heard, was found worthy to serve a wise man.
Luke 7:38 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Kgs 10:1 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 12:42 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The wife of the emperor Maximus served Martin at table with her own hands; Gallus compares her to the queen of Sheba.
- Magnus Maximus ruled the West 383–388 after being proclaimed by the army in Britain. Before “licet” the digital text has an unmatched opening bracket before sumus; it is removed as a stray mark. Allusions: Luke 7:38; 1 Kgs 10:1 (Matt 12:42).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; inline footnote letter or column number of the digitization; unmatched bracket in the digital text): ingressi [sumus, licet → ingressi sumus, licet; beatus. obstinatius → beatus obstinatius; postremo a → postremo.
Cite (SBL): Sulpicius Severus, Dial. 2.6 (CSEL 1:187–188; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/sulpicius-dialogi/2-4/#p-2-6). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-sulpicius-dialogi-2-6) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Halm, CSEL 1 (1866; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged; Halm's bracketed deletions left out and noted), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF² 11 (Roberts, 1894); differences checked against the Latin.
2.7CSEL 1:188–189
Ad haec Postumianus, iam dudum, inquit, Galle, audiens te loquentem uehementer admiror reginae fidem: sed ubi illud est, quod nulla umquam femina ferebatur propius adstitisse Martino? ecce ista regina non solum adstitit, sed etiam ministrauit. et uereor ne isto aliquantulum se tueantur exemplo qui libenter feminis inseruntur. Tum Gallus, quid tu, inquit, non uides, quod solent docere grammatici, locum, tempus et personam? propone enim tibi ante oculos captum in palatio imperatoris precibus ambiri, reginae fide cogi, temporis necessitate constringi, ut clausos carcere liberaret, exiliis datos restitueret, bona adempta rehiberet: haec quanti putas constare episcopo debuisse, ut pro his omnibus non aliquantulum de rigore propositi relaxaret? uerumtamen quia occasione huius exempli male usuros esse aliquos arbitraris, illi uero felices erunt, si a disciplina exempli istius non recedant. uideant enim, quia Martino semel tantum in uita iam septuagenario non uidua libera, non uirgo lasciuiens, sed sub uiro uiuens, ipso uiro pariter supplicante, regina seruiuit et ministrauit edenti, non cum epulante discubuit: nec ausa participare conuiuium, sed deferebat obsequium. disce igitur disciplinam: seruiat tibi matrona, non imperet, et seruiat, non recumbat: sicut Martha illa ministrauit Domino, nec tamen est adscita conuiuio: immo praelata est ministranti, quae uerbum potius audiebat. sed in Martino ista regina utrumque compleuit: et ministrauit ut Martha, et audiuit ut Maria. quodsi quis hoc uti uoluerit exemplo, per omnia teneat: talis causa sit talisque persona, tale obsequium, tale conuiuium, et in omni uita semel tantum.
At this Postumianus said: “For a long time now, Gallus, as I listen to you, I have greatly admired the queen’s faith; but what of the report that no woman ever came near Martin? Look, this queen not only came near him but even served him. And I am afraid that those who are glad to insinuate themselves among women may shelter themselves somewhat behind this example.” Then Gallus said: “Why, do you not see what the grammarians usually teach: place, time, and person? Picture to yourself a man held captive in the emperor’s palace, besieged by prayers, compelled by the queen’s faith, constrained by the necessity of the times, so that he might free those shut up in prison, restore those sent into exile, recover goods taken away: how much do you think these things ought to have been worth to a bishop, that for all of them he should not relax a little of the strictness of his rule? Still, since you think some will misuse the occasion of this example, they will indeed be happy if they do not depart from the discipline of this example. Let them see that once only in his life, when he was already seventy, not a free widow, not a wanton virgin, but a queen living under her husband, with her husband himself joining in the entreaty, served Martin and waited on him as he ate, did not recline with him at table, nor dared to share the meal, but offered service. Learn the discipline, then: let a matron serve you, not command you; and serve, not recline with you; as that Martha served the Lord and yet was not invited to the meal; indeed the one who rather listened to the word was preferred to her who served. But in Martin’s case this queen did both: she served like Martha and listened like Mary. If anyone wishes to use this example, let him keep it in every point: let the cause be such, the person such, the service such, the meal such, and only once in all his life.”
Luke 10:40 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 10:42 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Gallus answers that the circumstances excused the queen’s service, which happened once only; any who cite it must keep to every condition.
- Allusion: Luke 10:38–42.
Topics: Ethics, Church office
Cite (SBL): Sulpicius Severus, Dial. 2.7 (CSEL 1:188–189; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/sulpicius-dialogi/2-4/#p-2-7). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-sulpicius-dialogi-2-7) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Halm, CSEL 1 (1866; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged; Halm's bracketed deletions left out and noted), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF² 11 (Roberts, 1894); differences checked against the Latin.
2.8CSEL 1:189–190
Praeclare, inquit Postumianus, nostros istos, ut Martini non egrediantur exemplum, tua constringit oratio, sed profiteor tibi quia haec surdis auribus audientur. nam si Martini sequeremur uias, numquam causas de osculo diceremus et uniuersis scaenae opinionis opprobriis careremus. ceterum, sicut tu soles dicere, cum edacitatis argueris, Galli sumus: ita nos in hac parte numquam nec Martini exemplo uel tuis disputationibus corrigemur. uerumtamen haec nobis iam dudum agentibus, quid tu tam obstinate, Sulpici, taces? Ego uero, inquam, non solum modo taceo, sed olim de istis tacere disposui. nam quia quandam uiduam uagam, nitidulam, sumptuosam obiurgauerim lasciuius uictitantem, itidemque uirginem adulescenti cuidam mihi caro indecentius adhaerentem, cum quidem ipsam frequenter audissem alios etiam, qui talia agerent, increpantem, tanta mihi omnium feminarum cunctorumque monachorum odia conciui, ut aduersum me utraeque legiones iurata bella susceperint. unde quaeso taceatis, ne etiam quod uos loquimini ad meam referatur inuidiam. tota nobis istorum memoria relinquatur: ad Martinum potius reuertamur. tu Galle, ut adgressus es, coeptum opus explica. Tum ille, iam quidem uobis, inquit, tanta narraui, ut satisfacere studiis uestris meus sermo debuerit: sed quia uoluntati uestrae non obsecundare mihi non licet, quantum adhuc diei superest loquar. nam certe dum stramen illud, quod in lectos nostros paratur, aspicio, subuenit in memoriam etiam de stramine, in quo Martinus iacuerat, factam esse uirtutem. res ita gesta est. Claudiomagus uicus est in confinio Biturigum adque Turonorum. ecclesia ibi est celebris religione sanctorum nec minus gloriosa sacrarum uirginum multitudine. praeteriens ergo Martinus in secretario ecclesiae habuit mansionem. post discessum illius cunctae in secretarium illud uirgines inruerunt: adlambunt singula loca, ubi aut sederat uir beatus aut steterat, stramentum etiam, in quo iacuerat, partiuntur. una earum post dies paucos partem straminis, quam sibi pro benedictione collegerat, energumeno, quem spiritus erroris agitabat, de ceruice suspendit. nec mora, dicto citius eiecto daemone persona curata est.
“Splendidly,” said Postumianus, “your speech binds these people of ours not to go beyond Martin’s example; but I tell you that these things will be heard by deaf ears. For if we followed Martin’s ways, we would never be pleading cases about a kiss, and we would be free of all the reproaches of a scandalous reputation. But as you are accustomed to say, when you are accused of gluttony, ‘We are Gauls’: so in this respect we shall never be corrected either by Martin’s example or by your arguments. But while we have been dealing with these things so long, why are you so obstinately silent, Sulpicius?” “I,” I said, “not only keep silent now, but long ago resolved to keep silent about these things. For because I rebuked a certain widow, gadding about, smartly dressed, extravagant, living rather wantonly, and likewise a virgin who clung too unbecomingly to a young man dear to me (though I had often heard her rebuking others too who did such things), I stirred up against myself such hatred of all the women and all the monks that both legions have taken up sworn war against me. So please be silent, lest what you say too be laid to my account. Let all mention of these people be dropped: let us return rather to Martin. You, Gallus, carry on the work you began, as you set out to do.” Then he said: “I have already told you so much that my talk ought to have satisfied your eagerness; but since I may not fail to comply with your wish, I will speak as long as daylight remains. For indeed, as I look at that straw which is being got ready for our beds, it comes to my memory that a miracle was done even with the straw on which Martin had lain. It happened thus. Claudiomagus is a village on the border of the Bituriges and the Turoni. There is a church there, celebrated for the devotion of its saints and no less glorious for its multitude of consecrated virgins. Martin, passing through, lodged in the sacristy of the church. After his departure all the virgins rushed into that sacristy: they kissed every place where the blessed man had sat or stood, and divided even the straw on which he had lain. A few days later one of them hung part of the straw, which she had gathered for herself as a blessing, around the neck of a possessed man whom a spirit of error was tormenting. Without delay, quicker than words, the demon was cast out and the person was healed.
Notes and citation
Summary: Postumianus doubts that Gallic clergy will heed Martin’s example; Sulpicius complains of the hostility his rebukes earned him; Gallus tells how straw from Martin’s bed healed a possessed man at Claudiomagus.
- Claudiomagus is probably Clion, on the border of the territories of Bourges and Tours.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip): et uniuersis. scaenae opinionis → et uniuersis scaenae opinionis; de stramine, m quo → de stramine, in quo.
Topics: Ethics
Cite (SBL): Sulpicius Severus, Dial. 2.8 (CSEL 1:189–190; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/sulpicius-dialogi/2-4/#p-2-8). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-sulpicius-dialogi-2-8) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Halm, CSEL 1 (1866; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged; Halm's bracketed deletions left out and noted), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF² 11 (Roberts, 1894); differences checked against the Latin.
2.9CSEL 1:190–191
Per idem fere tempus Martino a Treueris reuertenti fit obuiam uacca, quam daemon agitabat: quae relicto grege suo in homines ferebatur et iam multos noxie petulca confoderat. uerum ubi nobis coepit esse contigua, ii qui eam eminus sequebantur, praedicere magna uoce coeperunt ut caueremus. sed postquam ad nos toruis furibunda luminibus propius accessit, Martinus eleuata manu pecudem consistere iubet: quae mox ad uerbum illius stare coepit inmobilis, cum interea uidit Martinus dorso illius daemonem supersedentem: quem increpans, discede, inquit, funeste, de pecude et innoxium animal agitare desiste. paruit nequam spiritus et recessit. nec defuit sensus in bucula, quin se intellegeret liberatam: ante pedes sancti recepta quiete prosternitur, dein iubente Martino gregem suum petiit seque agmini ceterarum oue placidior inmiscuit. hoc illud fuit tempus, quo inter medias flammas positus non sensit incendium, quod mihi non arbitror esse referendum, quia hoc plenius iste Sulpicius, licet in libro suo praeteritum, in epistula tamen postea, quam ad Eusebium, tunc presbyterum, modo episcopum fecit, exposuit: quam tu, Postumiane, aut credo legisti, aut si incognita tibi est, cum libuerit, in promptu ex illo armario habes: nos ab illo omissa referemus. Quodam tempore, cum dioeceses circuiret, uenantium agmen incurrimus. canes leporem sequebantur: iamque multo spatio uicta bestiola, cum undique campis late patentibus nullum esset effugium, mortem inminentem iam iamque capienda crebris flexibus differebat. cuius periculum uir beatus pia mente miseratus imperat canibus, desisterent sequi et sinerent abire fugientem. continuo ad primum sermonis imperium constiterunt: crederes uinctos, immo potius adfixos in suis haerere uestigiis. ita lepusculus persecutoribus alligatis incolumis euasit.
“At about the same time, as Martin was returning from Trier, a cow tormented by a demon met him: leaving its herd, it was charging at people and had already gored many, dangerous in its butting. But when it began to come near us, those who were following it at a distance began to shout loudly to warn us to take care. But after it came closer to us, raging with fierce eyes, Martin raised his hand and ordered the beast to stand still; and at his word it at once stood motionless. Meanwhile Martin saw a demon sitting on its back; rebuking it, he said: ‘Go away, deadly one, from the beast, and stop tormenting a harmless animal.’ The wicked spirit obeyed and withdrew. Nor did the heifer lack the sense to understand that she had been freed: her calm recovered, she lay down at the saint’s feet; then, at Martin’s bidding, she made for her herd and joined the rest of the cattle, gentler than a sheep. That was the time when, set in the midst of flames, he did not feel the fire. I do not think I need tell that, because Sulpicius here, though he passed it over in his book, set it out more fully afterwards in the letter he wrote to Eusebius, then a presbyter, now a bishop; you, Postumianus, have either read it, I believe, or, if you do not know it, you have it ready to hand in that cupboard whenever you like. We will tell what he left out. Once, while he was going around his parishes, we came upon a band of huntsmen. The dogs were chasing a hare; and the little creature, already worn out over a long distance, since there was no escape anywhere in the wide-open fields, kept putting off the death that threatened it, about to be caught at any moment, by frequent doubling back. The blessed man, pitying its danger with a devout heart, commanded the dogs to stop chasing and let the fugitive go. At once, at the first word of his command, they stood still: you would have thought them bound, or rather fixed, sticking in their tracks. So the little hare escaped unharmed, its pursuers tied fast.
Notes and citation
Summary: Martin calms a demon-possessed cow, and stops hounds chasing a hare; the fire story is referred to Sulpicius’s letter to Eusebius.
- The letter to Eusebius is Letter 1 of Sulpicius. The edition prints “toward it” (obuiam) after “raised his hand” in square brackets, marking it as spurious; it is left out.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (word in the editor's square brackets (deletion)): eleuata [obuiam] manu → eleuata manu.
Extrabiblical texts: Sulpicius Severus, Ep. 1 (Letters; allusion)
Cite (SBL): Sulpicius Severus, Dial. 2.9 (CSEL 1:190–191; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/sulpicius-dialogi/2-4/#p-2-9). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-sulpicius-dialogi-2-9) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Halm, CSEL 1 (1866; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged; Halm's bracketed deletions left out and noted), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF² 11 (Roberts, 1894); differences checked against the Latin.
2.10CSEL 1:191–192
Operae pretium autem est, etiam familiaria illius uerba, spiritualiter salsa, memorare. ouem recens tonsam forte conspexerat. euangelicum, inquit, mandatum ista conpleuit: duas habuit tunicas, unam earum largita est non habenti: ita ergo et uos facere debetis. item cum subulcum algentem ac paene nudum in pellicia ueste uidisset, en, inquit, Adam in ueste pellicea sues pascit: sed nos illo uetere deposito, qui adhuc in isto manet, nouum Adam potius induamus. boues ex parte prata depauerant, porci etiam nonnulla suffoderant: pars cetera, quae manebat inlaesa, diuersis floribus quasi picta uernabat. speciem, inquit, gerit pars illa coniugii, quae a pecore depasta etsi non penitus gratiam amisit herbarum, nullam tamen florum retinet dignitatem: illa uero, quam porci pecora inmunda foderunt, fornicationis imaginem foedam protendit: ceterum illa portio, quae nullam sensit iniuriam, gloriam uirginitatis ostendit: herbis fecunda luxuriat, foeni in ea fructus exuberat et ultra omnem speciem distincta floribus quasi gemmis micantibus ornata radiat. beata species et Deo digna: nihil enim uirginitati est conparandum. ita et illi, qui coniugia fornicationi comparant, uehementer errant, et illi qui coniugia uirginitati aequanda aestimant, miseri penitus et stulti sunt. uerum haec a sapientibus tenenda distinctio est, ut coniugium pertineat ad ueniam, uirginitas spectet ad gloriam, fornicatio deputetur ad poenam, nisi satisfactione purgetur.
“It is worth while also to recall his familiar sayings, spiritually seasoned. When he happened to see a sheep newly shorn, he said: ‘She has fulfilled the gospel command: she had two tunics, and gave one of them to one who had none; so you too ought to do.’ Likewise, when he had seen a swineherd shivering and almost naked in a garment of skins, he said: ‘Look, Adam in a garment of skins is feeding pigs; but let us rather put off that old Adam, who still remains in this man, and put on the new Adam.’ Oxen had grazed part of a meadow, and pigs had rooted up some of it; the remaining part, which was left untouched, was blooming with various flowers as though painted. ‘That part,’ he said, ‘which has been grazed by the cattle, bears the likeness of marriage: though it has not wholly lost the grace of its grass, it keeps none of the glory of flowers. That which the pigs, unclean beasts, have rooted up shows the foul image of fornication. But that portion which has suffered no harm shows the glory of virginity: it is luxuriant with rich grass, the crop of hay abounds in it, and, adorned with flowers beyond all beauty, it shines as if decked with sparkling gems. Blessed beauty, and worthy of God: for nothing is to be compared with virginity. So those who compare marriage with fornication greatly err, and those who think marriage equal to virginity are utterly wretched and foolish. But this distinction is to be held by the wise: marriage belongs to pardon, virginity looks to glory, fornication is assigned to punishment, unless it is cleansed by satisfaction.’
Luke 3:11 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 3:21 (allusion, high confidence) · Eph 4:22 (allusion, high confidence) · Eph 4:24 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 15:45 (allusion, medium confidence) · 1 Cor 7:6 (echo, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Martin’s sayings: a shorn sheep fulfills the gospel; a swineherd recalls the old Adam; a meadow partly grazed, partly rooted, partly untouched pictures marriage, fornication, and virginity.
- “Marriage belongs to pardon” echoes 1 Cor 7:6 (“by way of concession”). The edition prints “cast out of paradise” after “Adam” in square brackets, marking it as spurious; it is left out. Allusions: Luke 3:11; Gen 3:21; Eph 4:22–24; 1 Cor 15:45.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip; words in the editor's square brackets (deletion)): quem recens tonsam → ouem recens tonsam; Adam [eiectus de paradiso] in ueste → Adam in ueste; coniugia fornication comparant → coniugia fornicationi comparant.
Cite (SBL): Sulpicius Severus, Dial. 2.10 (CSEL 1:191–192; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/sulpicius-dialogi/2-4/#p-2-10). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-sulpicius-dialogi-2-10) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Halm, CSEL 1 (1866; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged; Halm's bracketed deletions left out and noted), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF² 11 (Roberts, 1894); differences checked against the Latin.
2.11CSEL 1:192–194
Miles quidam cingulum in ecclesia, monachum professus, abiecerat: cellulam sibi eminus in remoto quasi eremita uicturus erexerat. interea astutus inimicus uariis cogitationibus brutum pectus agitabat, ut coniugem suam, quam Martinus in monasterio puellarum esse praeceperat, uoluntate mutata secum potius uellet habitare. adit ergo Martinum fortis eremita et quid haberet animi confitetur. ille uero uehementer abnuere, feminam uiro rursus, iam monacho, non marito, incongrua ratione misceri. postremo cum miles insisteret, adfirmans nihil hoc proposito esse nociturum: se solo coniugis uti uelle solacio, porro ne rursus se in sua reuoluerent, non esse metuendum: se esse militem Christi, illam quoque in eadem militiae sacramenta iurasse: pateretur episcopus sanctos et sexum suum fidei merito nescientes pariter militare. tum Martinus — uerba uobis ipsa dicturus sum — dic mihi, inquit, si umquam in bello fuisti, si in acie constitisti? at ille respondens, frequenter, inquit, in acie steti et in bello frequenter interfui. ad haec Martinus: dic mihi ergo: numquid in illa acie, quae armata in proelium parabatur aut iam aduersus hostilem exercitum conlato comminus pede destricto ense pugnabat, ullam feminam stare aut pugnare uidisti? tum demum miles confusus erubuit, gratias agens errori suo se non fuisse permissum, nec aspera increpatione uerborum, sed uera et rationabili secundum personam militis conparatione correctum. Martinus autem conuersus ad nos, sicut eum frequens fratrum turba uallauerat, mulier, inquit, uirorum castra non adeat, acies militum separata consistat: procul femina in suo degens tabernaculo sit remota. contemptibilem enim reddit exercitum, si uirorum cohortibus turba feminea misceatur. miles in acie, miles pugnet in campo: mulier se intra murorum munimenta contineat. habet et illa gloriam suam, si pudicitiam uiro absente seruauerit: cuius haec prima uirtus et consummata uictoria est, non uideri.
“A certain soldier had thrown off his military belt in the church, professing himself a monk, and had built himself a cell some distance off in a remote place, intending to live as a hermit. Meanwhile the cunning enemy stirred up his dull breast with various thoughts, so that, changing his mind, he wished that his wife, whom Martin had directed to be in a monastery of women, should rather live with him. So the brave hermit went to Martin and confessed what was on his mind. Martin vehemently refused: it was unfitting that a woman should again be joined with a man who was now a monk and not a husband. Finally, when the soldier insisted, declaring that this would do his purpose no harm: he wished only for the comfort of his wife, and there was no fear that they would fall back into their old ways; he was a soldier of Christ, and she too had sworn the oath of the same military service; let the bishop allow saints, who by the merit of faith knew nothing of their sex, to serve together; then Martin (I will tell you his very words) said: ‘Tell me, have you ever been in a war? Have you stood in the battle line?’ He answered: ‘I have often stood in the battle line and often been in war.’ To this Martin said: ‘Tell me, then: in that line which was being drawn up armed for battle, or was already fighting at close quarters with drawn sword against the enemy army, did you ever see any woman standing or fighting?’ Then at last the soldier was confounded and blushed, thanking him that he had not been allowed to follow his error, and that he had been corrected not by harsh rebuke but by a true and reasonable comparison suited to a soldier. And Martin, turning to us, as a large crowd of brothers had surrounded him, said: ‘Let a woman not enter the camp of men; let the battle line of soldiers stand apart; let the woman be removed far off, living in her own tent. For an army is made contemptible if a crowd of women is mixed with the cohorts of men. Let the soldier fight in the line, the soldier in the field; let the woman keep herself within the defenses of the walls. She too has her glory, if she keeps her chastity while her husband is away; and her first virtue and complete victory is not to be seen.’
Notes and citation
Summary: A soldier turned monk wants his wife, now a nun, to live with him; Martin answers that no woman stands in the battle line, and that a woman’s victory is not to be seen.
Cite (SBL): Sulpicius Severus, Dial. 2.11 (CSEL 1:192–194; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/sulpicius-dialogi/2-4/#p-2-11). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-sulpicius-dialogi-2-11) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Halm, CSEL 1 (1866; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged; Halm's bracketed deletions left out and noted), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF² 11 (Roberts, 1894); differences checked against the Latin.
2.12CSEL 1:194–195
Illud uero, Sulpici, meminisse te credo, quo affectu nobis, cum et tu coram adesses, illam uirginem praedicarit, quae ita se penitus ab omnium uirorum oculis remouisset, ut ne ipsum quidem ad se Martinum, cum eam ille officii causa uisitare uellet, admiserit. nam cum praeter agellum illius praeteriret, in quo se ante conplures annos pudica cohibuerat, audita fide illius adque uirtute deuertit, ut tam inlustris meriti puellam religioso officio episcopus honoraret. nos consequentes gauisuram illam uirginem putabamus, siquidem hoc in testimonium uirtutis suae esset habitura, ad quam tanti nominis sacerdos deposito propositi rigore uenisset. uerum illa fortissimi uincula propositi ne Martini quidem contemplatione laxauit. ita uir beatus accepta per aliam feminam excusatione laudabili ab illius foribus, quae se uidendam salutandamque non dederat, laetus abscessit. o uirginem gloriosam, quae ne a Martino quidem passa est se uideri! o Martinum beatum, qui illam repulsam non ad contumeliam suam duxit, sed magnificans illius cum exultatione uirtutem inusitato in his dumtaxat regionibus gaudebat exemplo! ergo cum haut longe ab illa uillula nos manere nox inminens coegisset, xenium beato uiro eadem illa uirgo transmisit: fecitque Martinus, quod ante non fecerat — nullius enim ille umquam xenium, nullius munus accepit —: nihil ex his, quae uirgo uenerabilis miserat, refutauit, dicens benedictionem illius a sacerdote minime respuendam, quae esset multis sacerdotibus praeferenda. audiant, quaeso, uirgines istud exemplum, ut fores suas, si eas malis obsistere uolunt, etiam bonis claudant, et, ne ad se inprobis sit liber accessus, non uereantur excludere etiam sacerdotes. totus hoc mundus exaudiat: uideri se a Martino uirgo non passa est. non utique illa quemcumque a se reppulit sacerdotem, sed in eius uiri conspectum puella non uenit, quem uidere salus uidentium fuit. quis autem hoc praeter Martinum sacerdos non ad suam iniuriam rettulisset? quos aduersum sanctam uirginem motus quantasque iras mente concepisset? haereticam iudicasset et anathemandam esse decreuisset. quam uero illi beatae animae illas uirgines praetulisset, quae crebris occursibus ubique se praebent obuias sacerdoti, quae conuiuia sumptuosa disponunt, quae una pariter discumbunt! sed quo me ducit oratio? paululum iste liberior sermo reprimendus est, ne in aliquorum forsitan incurrat offensam: etenim infidelibus obiurgationis uerba non proderunt, fidelibus autem satisfaciet exemplum. uerum ego ita uirtutem huius uirginis praedicabo, ut tamen nihil illis, quae ad Martinum uidendum ei longinquis regionibus saepe uenerunt, arbitrer derogandum, siquidem hoc beatum uirum frequenter affectu etiam angeli frequentarint.
“I believe you remember, Sulpicius, with what feeling, when you too were present, he praised to us that virgin who had so wholly withdrawn herself from the eyes of all men that she did not admit even Martin himself when he wished to visit her as a courtesy. For when he was passing by her little property, in which she had kept herself chastely shut away for a good many years, having heard of her faith and virtue, he turned aside so that he, as bishop, might honor with a devout courtesy a girl of such distinguished merit. We, following, thought that the virgin would be delighted, since she would have it as a testimony to her virtue that a priest of so great a name had come to her, setting aside the strictness of his rule. But she did not loosen the bonds of her very firm resolve even out of regard for Martin. So the blessed man, having received a praiseworthy excuse through another woman, went away gladly from the doors of her who had not let herself be seen or greeted. O glorious virgin, who would not let herself be seen even by Martin! O blessed Martin, who did not take that refusal as an insult to himself, but, magnifying her virtue with exultation, rejoiced in an example unusual, at least in these regions! So when the approaching night had forced us to stay not far from that little farm, the same virgin sent the blessed man a gift; and Martin did what he had never done before (for he never accepted anyone’s gift or present): he refused nothing of what the venerable virgin had sent, saying that her blessing was by no means to be rejected by a priest, since she was to be preferred to many priests. Let virgins hear this example, I beg, so that, if they wish to bar their doors to the wicked, they may close them even to the good, and, lest the wicked have free access to them, may not fear to shut out even priests. Let the whole world hear this: a virgin did not let herself be seen by Martin. She did not, surely, repel just any priest, but the girl did not come into the sight of that man whom to see was salvation for those who saw him. But what priest other than Martin would not have taken this as an insult to himself? What emotions, how great anger, would he have conceived against the holy virgin! He would have judged her a heretic and decreed that she be anathematized. And how he would have preferred to that blessed soul those virgins who everywhere put themselves in the priest’s way with frequent meetings, who arrange sumptuous banquets, who recline at table with him! But where is my speech taking me? This rather free talk must be checked a little, lest perhaps it give offense to some; for words of rebuke will not help the unfaithful, and the example will suffice for the faithful. But I will praise the virtue of this virgin in such a way that I think nothing should be taken from those who often came from distant regions to see Martin, since angels too, in their love, often visited this blessed man.
Notes and citation
Summary: Martin praised a virgin who refused even to let him see her, and accepted her gift; Gallus contrasts her with virgins who seek out priests and banquets.
Topics: Ethics, Church office
Cite (SBL): Sulpicius Severus, Dial. 2.12 (CSEL 1:194–195; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/sulpicius-dialogi/2-4/#p-2-12). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-sulpicius-dialogi-2-12) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Halm, CSEL 1 (1866; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged; Halm's bracketed deletions left out and noted), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF² 11 (Roberts, 1894); differences checked against the Latin.
2.13CSEL 1:195–197
Ceterum hoc, quod dicturus sum, Sulpici, hoc te—me autem intuebatur — teste perhibeo. Quodam die ego et iste Sulpicius pro foribus illius excubantes iam per aliquot horas cum silentio sedebamus, ingenti horrore et tremore, ac si ante angeli tabernaculum mandatas excubias duceremus, cum quidem nos, clauso cellulae suae ostio, ibi esse nesciret. interim conloquentium murmur audimus et mox horrore quodam circumfundimur ac stupore, nec ignorare potuimus nescio quid fuisse diuinum. post duas fere horas ad nos Martinus egreditur: ac tum eum iste Sulpicius, sicut apud eum nemo familiarius loquebatur, coepit orare, ut pie quaerentibus indicaret, quid illud diuini fuisset horroris, quod fatebamur nos ambo sensisse, uel cum quibus fuisset in cellula conlocutus: tenuem enim nos scilicet et uix intellectum sermocinantium sonum pro foribus audisse. tum ille diu multumque cunctatus - sed nihil erat quod ei Sulpicius non extorqueret inuito: incredibiliora forte dicturus sum, sed Christo teste non mentior, nisi quisquam est tam sacrilegus, ut Martinum aestimet fuisse mentitum –: dicam, inquit, uobis, sed uos nulli quaeso dicatis: Agnes, Thecla et Maria mecum fuerunt. referebat autem nobis uultum adque habitum singularum. nec uero illo tantum die, sed frequenter se ab eis confessus est uisitari: Petrum etiam et Paulum Apostolos uideri a se saepius non negauit. iam uero daemones, prout ad eum quisque uenisset, suis nominibus increpabat. Mercurium maxime patiebatur infestum, Iouem brutum adque hebetem esse dicebat. haec plerisque etiam in eodem monasterio constitutis incredibilia uidebantur, nedum ego confidam omnes, qui haec audient, credituros. nam nisi inaestimabilem uitam adque uirtutem Martinus egisset, nequaquam apud nos tanta gloria praeditus haberetur. quamquam minime mirum, si in operibus Martini infirmitas humana dubitauit, cum multos hodieque uideamus nec Euangeliis credidisse. a Martino autem saepe angelos uisos familiariter et sensimus et experti sumus. rem minimam dicturus sum, sed tamen dicam. apud Nemausum episcoporum synodus habebatur, ad quam quidem ire noluerat, sed quid gestum esset scire cupiebat. casu cum eo iste Sulpicius nauigabat, sed procul, ut semper, a ceteris in remota nauis parte residebat. ibi angelus, quid gestum esset in synodo, ei nuntiauit. nos postea tempus habiti concilii sollicite requirentes satis conpertum habuimus, ipsum diem fuisse conuentus et eadem ibi fuisse decreta, quae Martino angelus nuntiarat.
“But this, which I am about to tell, Sulpicius, I declare with you as witness” (and he looked at me). “One day Sulpicius here and I, keeping watch before his doors, had been sitting in silence for some hours, with great awe and trembling, as though we were keeping an appointed watch before an angel’s tent, though he, with the door of his cell shut, did not know we were there. Meanwhile we hear the murmur of people talking, and soon we are filled with a kind of awe and amazement, and could not be unaware that something divine was there. After about two hours Martin comes out to us; and then Sulpicius here, since no one talked with him more familiarly, began to beg him to tell us, who asked devoutly, what that divine awe was which we both confessed we had felt, or with whom he had been talking in his cell; for we had heard before the doors a faint and barely intelligible sound of people conversing. Then he, after long and much hesitation (but there was nothing Sulpicius could not wring from him against his will; I am going to tell something perhaps very hard to believe, but with Christ as witness I do not lie, unless anyone is so sacrilegious as to think that Martin lied), said: ‘I will tell you, but please tell no one: Agnes, Thecla, and Mary were with me.’ And he described to us the face and appearance of each. And not only on that day, but he confessed that he was often visited by them; nor did he deny that he quite often saw the apostles Peter and Paul. Moreover, as each of the demons came to him, he rebuked them by their own names. Mercury he found especially hostile; Jupiter, he said, was brutish and dull. These things seemed incredible even to many who lived in the same monastery; much less can I be confident that all who hear them will believe. For unless Martin had led a life and shown a virtue beyond all estimate, he would by no means be held among us in such glory. Yet it is no wonder if human weakness has doubted about Martin’s works, since we see many even today who have not believed the Gospels. But we both perceived and experienced that angels were often seen by Martin and spoke familiarly with him. I am going to tell a very small thing, but I will tell it. A synod of bishops was being held at Nîmes, to which he had refused to go, but he wanted to know what had been done. As it happened, Sulpicius here was sailing with him, but Martin sat, as always, far from the others in a remote part of the ship. There an angel told him what had been done at the synod. Afterwards, inquiring carefully about the time when the council had been held, we found well established that it was the very day of the meeting, and that the same things had been decreed there which the angel had told Martin.
Notes and citation
Summary: Gallus and Sulpicius heard voices in Martin’s cell; Martin admitted that Agnes, Thecla, and Mary visited him, and Peter and Paul; he named demons as Jupiter and Mercury; an angel told him the decisions of the synod of Nîmes.
- The synod of Nîmes met in 394 or 396. “Mary” here is probably the mother of the Lord.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip): ut Martinam aestimet → ut Martinum aestimet; multos s hodieque → multos hodieque; rem minimam dicturus eum → rem minimam dicturus sum; Sulpicius. nauigabat → Sulpicius nauigabat.
Topics: Church office
Cite (SBL): Sulpicius Severus, Dial. 2.13 (CSEL 1:195–197; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/sulpicius-dialogi/2-4/#p-2-13). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-sulpicius-dialogi-2-13) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Halm, CSEL 1 (1866; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged; Halm's bracketed deletions left out and noted), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF² 11 (Roberts, 1894); differences checked against the Latin.
2.14CSEL 1:197–198
Ceterum cum ab eo de fine saeculi quaereremus, ait nobis, Neronem et Antichristum prius esse uenturos: Neronem in occidentali plaga subactis decem regibus imperaturum, persecutionem ab eo eatenus exercendam, ut idola gentium coli cogat. ab Antichristo uero primum Orientis imperium esse capiendum, qui quidem sedem et caput regni Hierosolymam esset habiturus: ab illo et urbem et templum esse reparandum. illius eam persecutionem futuram, ut Christum Deum cogat negari, se potius Christum esse confirmans, omnesque secundum legem circumcidi iubeat: ipsum denique Neronem ab Antichristo esse perimendum, adque ita sub illius potestate uniuersum orbem cunctasque gentes esse redigendas, donec Christi aduentu impius opprimatur. non esse autem dubium, quin Antichristus malo spiritu conceptus iam natus esset et iam in annis puerilibus constitutus, aetate legitima sumpturus imperium. quod autem haec ab illo audiuimus, annus octauus est: uos aestimate, quam iam in praecipiti consistant, quae futura metuuntur. Haec cum maxime Gallus, necdum explicitis quae statuerat referre, loqueretur, puer familiaris ingressus est, nuntians, Refrigerium presbyterum stare pro foribus. dubitare coepimus, utrum Gallum adhuc esset melius audire, an exoptatissimo nobis uiro, qui officii causa ad nos ueniebat, occurrere. tum Gallus: etiamsi non ob aduentum sanctissimi sacerdotis relinquenda nobis haec esset oratio, nox ipsa cogebat hucusque prolatum finire sermonem. uerum quia de Martini uirtutibus nequaquam explicari uniuersa potuerunt, haec uos hodie audisse sufficiat, cras reliqua dicemus. ita pariter accepta hac Galli sponsione surreximus.
“When we asked him about the end of the world, he told us that Nero and Antichrist would come first. Nero would rule in the western region, having subdued ten kings, and his persecution would go so far as to compel the worship of the idols of the Gentiles. Antichrist, on the other hand, would first seize the empire of the East, and would have Jerusalem as the seat and capital of his kingdom; the city and the temple would be rebuilt by him. His persecution would be such as to compel people to deny that Christ is God, he himself rather affirming that he is the Christ, and he would order all to be circumcised according to the law; finally Nero himself would be slain by Antichrist, and so the whole world and all nations would be brought under his power, until the impious one is overthrown by the coming of Christ. And there was no doubt, he said, that Antichrist, conceived by an evil spirit, was already born and already in his boyhood, and would take power when he came of age. It is now the eighth year since we heard this from him: judge, then, how close at hand are the things that are feared to come.” While Gallus was saying this, before he had finished what he meant to tell, a servant of the household came in, announcing that the presbyter Refrigerius was standing at the door. We began to hesitate whether it was better to go on listening to Gallus or to go to meet a man most dear to us, who was coming to us out of courtesy. Then Gallus said: “Even if we did not have to break off this talk because of the arrival of that most holy priest, night itself would compel us to end the conversation drawn out so far. But since by no means everything about Martin’s miracles could be set out, let it be enough that you have heard these things today; tomorrow we will tell the rest.” So, having all accepted Gallus’s promise, we rose.
Rev 17:12 (allusion, medium confidence) · 2 Thess 2:4 (allusion, high confidence) · 2 Thess 2:8 (allusion, high confidence) · Dan 7:24 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Martin foretold that Nero would return in the West and Antichrist, already born, would rule from Jerusalem; the conversation breaks off at the arrival of the presbyter Refrigerius.
- Martin’s expectation of a returning Nero and an Antichrist already born is reported as Gallus gives it. Allusions: Rev 17:12; 2 Thess 2:3–8; Dan 7:24.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip): circumcidj → circumcidi; nos aestimate → uos aestimate.
Topics: Eschatology, Persecution
Cite (SBL): Sulpicius Severus, Dial. 2.14 (CSEL 1:197–198; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/sulpicius-dialogi/2-4/#p-2-14). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-sulpicius-dialogi-2-14) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Halm, CSEL 1 (1866; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged; Halm's bracketed deletions left out and noted), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF² 11 (Roberts, 1894); differences checked against the Latin.
Chapter 3
3.1CSEL 1:198–199
Lucescit hoc, Galle: surgendum est. nam, ut uides, et Postumianus instat et hic presbyter, qui hesterno auditorium amisit, exspectat, ut quae de Martino nostro in hodiernum diem explicanda distuleras, debitor sponsionis euoluas. non ignarus quidem iste omnium, quaecumque memoranda sunt, sed dulcis et grata cognitio est etiam nota relegenti, siquidem natura ita conparatum sit, ut meliore quis conscientia se nosse congaudeat, quae multorum testimoniis non esse incerta cognoscat. nam hic a prima adulescentia Martinum secutus nouit quidem omnia, sed libenter cognita recognoscit. fatebor enim tibi, Galle, Martini mihi saepius auditas esse uirtutes, quippe qui de eo etiam litteris multa mandauerim: sed per gestorum admirationem semper mihi noua sunt, quae de illo licet audita saepius reuoluuntur. proinde additum nobis Refrigerium auditorem eo inpensius gratulamur, quo promptius Postumianus iste, qui haec Orienti inferre festinat, quasi sub testibus consignatam abs te accepturus est ueritatem. haec me loquente, Gallo iam ad narrandum parato, inruit turba monachorum, Euagrius presbyter, Aper, Sabbatius, Agricola: et post paululum ingreditur presbyter Aetherius cum Calupione diacono et Amatore subdiacono: postremus Aurelius presbyter, dulcissimus meus, longiore uia ueniens anhelus occurrit. Quid, inquam, tam subito et insperati tam ex diuersis regionibus tam mane concurritis? Nos, inquiunt, hesterno cognouimus, Gallum istum per totum diem Martini narrasse uirtutes, et reliqua in hodiernum diem, quia nox oppresserat, distulisse: propterea maturauimus frequens auditorium facere de tanta materia locuturo. interea nuntiatur multos saecularium stare pro foribus, nec ingredi audentes, sed ut admitterentur rogantes. tum Aper, nequaquam, inquit, istos nobis admisceri conuenit, quia ad audiendum curiositate potius quam religione uenerunt. confusus ego illorum uice, quos non admittendos esse censebat, aegre tandem obtinui, ut Eucherium ex uicariis et Celsum admitterent consularem, ceteri sunt repulsi. tum Gallum media in sede conponimus: qui cum diu nobili sua uerecundia silentium tenuisset, tandem ita exorsus est.
“It is getting light, Gallus: we must get up. For, as you see, Postumianus is pressing, and this presbyter, who missed his audience yesterday, is waiting for you to pay your promised debt and unfold what you had put off until today about our Martin. He is not, indeed, ignorant of anything worth recording, but knowledge is sweet and welcome even to one who goes over what he knows, since nature is so made that one rejoices, with a better conscience, to know things that one learns are not uncertain from the testimony of many. For he, having followed Martin from his early youth, knows everything indeed, but gladly recognizes what he knows. For I will confess to you, Gallus, that I have often heard of Martin’s miracles, since I have committed many things about him to writing; but through admiration of his deeds the things told about him are always new to me, though I have often heard them. So we are the more glad that Refrigerius has been added to our audience, because Postumianus here, who is hastening to carry these things to the East, will be the readier to receive the truth from you sealed, as it were, before witnesses.” While I was saying this, and Gallus was already prepared to narrate, a crowd of monks burst in: the presbyter Evagrius, Aper, Sabbatius, Agricola; and after a little the presbyter Aetherius came in with the deacon Calupio and the subdeacon Amator; last of all the presbyter Aurelius, my dearest friend, coming from farther away, hurried in out of breath. “Why,” I said, “do you come together so suddenly and unexpectedly, from such different places, so early?” “We learned yesterday,” they said, “that Gallus here spent the whole day telling of Martin’s miracles and put off the rest until today, since night had overtaken him; so we hurried to make a full audience for one who is going to speak on so great a subject.” Meanwhile it was announced that many people of the world were standing at the doors, not daring to come in, but asking to be admitted. Then Aper said: “It is by no means fitting that they should be mixed with us, because they have come to listen from curiosity rather than devotion.” I, embarrassed on behalf of those he thought should not be admitted, at last with difficulty obtained that they admit Eucherius, one of the vicars, and Celsus, a former consular; the rest were turned away. Then we set Gallus in a seat in the middle; and when, with his noble modesty, he had kept silent for a long time, he at last began thus.
Notes and citation
Summary: On the second morning many monks and clergy gather to hear Gallus, and two officials are admitted; the rest of the lay crowd is turned away.
- The edition prints “also” (et) after “For” in square brackets, marking it as spurious; it is left out. Aurelius is the deacon of Letter 2, now a presbyter.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (word in the editor's square brackets (deletion)): nam [et] hic a prima → nam hic a prima.
Cite (SBL): Sulpicius Severus, Dial. 3.1 (CSEL 1:198–199; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/sulpicius-dialogi/2-4/#p-3-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-sulpicius-dialogi-3-1) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Halm, CSEL 1 (1866; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged; Halm's bracketed deletions left out and noted), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF² 11 (Roberts, 1894); differences checked against the Latin.
3.2CSEL 1:199–200
Conuenistis, inquit, ad me audiendum, uiri sancti et diserti, sed religiosas potius quam doctas aures, ut arbitror, adtulistis, audituri me fidei testem, non oratoris copia locuturum. quae autem hesterno dicta sunt, non reuoluam: illa qui non audierunt, ex scripturis cognoscent. noua Postumianus expectat nuntiaturus Orienti, ne se in conparatione Martini praeferat Occidenti. ac primum gestit animus, quod Refrigerius in aurem suggerit, explicare: res in Carnutena gesta est ciuitate. Paterfamilias quidam duodecennem filiam ab utero mutam Martino coepit offerre, poscens ut linguam ligatam meritis suis sanctis uir beatus solueret. ille cedens episcopis, qui tam forte latus illius ambiebant, Valentino adque Victricio, inparem se esse tantae moli, sed illis quasi sanctioribus nihil inpossibile fatebatur. at illi pias preces una cum patre supplici uoce iungentes orare Martinum ut sperata praestaret. nec cunctatus ultra utrumque praeclarum, et ostendendo humilitatem nec differendo pietatem - iubet circumstantis populi multitudinem submoueri: episcopis tantum et puellae patre adsistentibus in orationem suo illo more prosternitur. dein pusillum olei cum exorcismi praefatione benedicit, adque ita in os puellae sanctificatum liquorem, cum et linguam illius digitis teneret, infudit. nec fefellit sanctum uirtutis euentus. patris nomen interrogat: mox illa respondit. proclamat pater cum gaudio pariter et lacrimis Martini genua conplexus, et hanc primam se filiae audisse uocem cunctis stupentibus fatebatur. ac ne cuiquam id incredibile forte uideatur, perhibeat uobis praesens Euagrius testimonium ueritatis: nam res ipso praesente tum gesta est.
“You have come together to hear me,” he said, “holy and eloquent men; but you have brought, I think, devout rather than learned ears, to hear me speak as a witness to the faith, not with an orator’s fluency. What was said yesterday I will not repeat; those who did not hear it will learn it from the written account. Postumianus expects new things to report to the East, so that it may not prefer itself to the West in comparison with Martin. And first my mind is eager to set out what Refrigerius is whispering in my ear. The event took place in the city of the Carnutes. A certain father of a family began to bring to Martin his twelve-year-old daughter, mute from birth, asking that the blessed man might loose her bound tongue by his holy merits. Martin, deferring to the bishops who happened to be at his side, Valentinus and Victricius, declared that he was unequal to so great a task, but that nothing was impossible for them, as holier men. But they joined their devout prayers with the father’s suppliant voice and begged Martin to grant what was hoped for. Without further hesitation (both admirable things: showing humility and not delaying mercy) he ordered the crowd of people standing around to be moved away; with only the bishops and the girl’s father present, he prostrated himself in prayer in his usual way. Then he blessed a little oil, with the preliminary words of exorcism, and so poured the sanctified liquid into the girl’s mouth, while holding her tongue with his fingers. Nor did the result of power disappoint the saint. He asks her father’s name: at once she answered. The father cried out with joy and tears together, embracing Martin’s knees, and declared to the amazement of all that this was the first word he had heard from his daughter. And lest this perhaps seem incredible to anyone, let Evagrius, who is present, bear witness to the truth for you; for the thing was done then in his presence.”
Notes and citation
Summary: At Chartres Martin heals a girl mute from birth with blessed oil, in the presence of the bishops Valentinus and Victricius.
- The city of the Carnutes is Chartres. Victricius was bishop of Rouen; Valentinus probably of Chartres.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip): in Camutena gesta → in Carnutena gesta.
Topics: Prayer
Cite (SBL): Sulpicius Severus, Dial. 3.2 (CSEL 1:199–200; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/sulpicius-dialogi/2-4/#p-3-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-sulpicius-dialogi-3-2) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Halm, CSEL 1 (1866; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged; Halm's bracketed deletions left out and noted), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF² 11 (Roberts, 1894); differences checked against the Latin.
3.3CSEL 1:200–201
Paruum illud est, quod nuper Arpagio presbytero referente cognoui, sed non praetermittendum uidetur. Auitiani comitis uxorem misisse Martino oleum, quod ad diuersas morborum causas necessarium, sicut est consuetudo, benediceret: ampullam uitream istiusmodi fuisse, ut rotunda in uentrem cresceret ore producto, sed oris extantis concauum non repletum, quia ita moris sit uascula conplere, ut pars summa umbonibus obstruendis libera relinquatur. testabatur presbyter uidisse se oleum sub Martini benedictione creuisse, quoad exundante copia superne difflueret: eademque, dum ad matremfamilias uasculum referretur, ferbuisse uirtute: nam inter manus pueri portantis ita semper exundasse oleum, ut omne illius uestimentum copia superfusi liquoris operiret: matronam ita usque ad summum labrum plenum uasculum recepisse, ut presbyter hodieque fateatur, obdendi pessuli, quo claudi diligentius seruanda consuerunt, in uitro illo spatium non fuisse. mirum et illud, quod huic — me autem intuebatur - memini contigisse. uas uitreum cum oleo, quod Martinus benedixerat, in fenestra paululum editiore deposuit: puer familiaris incautior linteum superpositum, ampullam ibi esse ignorans, adtraxit. uas super constratum marmore pauimentum decidit. cunctis metu exterritis benedictionem Dei perisse, ampulla perinde incolumis est reperta, ac si super plumas mollissimas decidisset. quae res non potius ad casum quam ad Martini est referenda uirtutem, cuius benedictio perire non potuit. Quid illud, quod factum a quodam est, cuius nomen, quia praesens est et prodi se uetuit, supprimetur: cui quidem tempori hic etiam Saturninus interfuit. canis nobis inportunior oblatrabat. in nomine, inquit, Martini iubeo te obmutescere. canis — haesit latratus in gutture: linguam abscisam putares - obmutuit. ita parum est ipsum Martinum fecisse uirtutes: credite mihi, quia etiam alii in nomine eius multa fecerunt.
“It is a small thing, which I learned lately from the account of the presbyter Arpagius, but it does not seem to be passed over. The wife of the count Avitianus sent Martin some oil, needed for various kinds of illness, for him to bless, as is the custom. The glass flask was of such a kind that it swelled out round in the belly, with a long neck; but the hollow of the projecting neck was not filled, because it is the custom to fill such vessels so that the top part is left free for inserting the stoppers. The presbyter testified that he saw the oil increase under Martin’s blessing until it overflowed abundantly from the top; and that the same power was at work while the vessel was being carried back to the lady: for in the hands of the boy carrying it the oil kept overflowing, so that the abundance of the spilling liquid covered all his clothing; and the lady received the vessel so full to the very brim that the presbyter declares to this day that there was no room in that glass to insert the stopper with which things to be kept with special care are usually closed. This too is wonderful, which I remember happened to him” (and he looked at me). “He put a glass vessel containing oil that Martin had blessed in a rather high window; a household servant, rather careless, not knowing the flask was there, pulled the linen cloth laid over it. The vessel fell onto the marble-paved floor. While all were terrified that God’s blessing had been lost, the flask was found unharmed, just as if it had fallen on the softest feathers. This is to be ascribed not to chance but to the power of Martin, whose blessing could not perish. What of the thing done by a certain man whose name, since he is present and has forbidden it to be revealed, will be suppressed; Saturninus here was present at the time. A dog was barking at us rather troublesomely. ‘In the name of Martin,’ he said, ‘I command you to be silent.’ The dog (the bark stuck in its throat: you would have thought its tongue cut out) fell silent. So it is a small thing that Martin himself worked miracles: believe me, others too have done many things in his name.
Notes and citation
Summary: Oil blessed by Martin overflows its flask; a flask of his oil falls without breaking; a dog is silenced in Martin’s name.
Cite (SBL): Sulpicius Severus, Dial. 3.3 (CSEL 1:200–201; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/sulpicius-dialogi/2-4/#p-3-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-sulpicius-dialogi-3-3) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Halm, CSEL 1 (1866; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged; Halm's bracketed deletions left out and noted), then compared section by section with the public-domain English of NPNF² 11 (Roberts, 1894); differences checked against the Latin.