Church History 3.25.6
Summary: The list distinguishes acknowledged, disputed, and heretical writings such as the Gospels of Peter, Thomas, and Matthias and various apocryphal Acts.
Greek text · Dindorf 4:116–117
ἀναγκαίως δὲ καὶ τούτων ὅμως τὸν κατάλογον πεποιήμεθα, διακρίναντες τάς τε κατὰ τὴν ἐκκλησιαστικὴν παράδοσιν ἀληθεῖς καὶ ἀπλάστους καὶ ἀνωμολογημένας γραφὰς, καὶ τὰς ἄλλας παρὰ ταύτας, οὐκ ἐνδιαθήκους μὲν, ἀλλὰ καὶ ἀντιλεγομένας, ὅμως δὲ παρὰ πλείστοις τῶν ἐκκλησιαστικῶν γινωσκομένας, ἵνʼ εἰδέναι ἔχοιμεν αὐτάς τε ταύτας καὶ τὰς ὀνόματι τῶν ἀποστόλων πρὸς τῶν αἱρετικῶν προφερομένας, ἤτοι ὡς Πέτρου καὶ Θωμᾶ καὶ Ματθία ἢ καί τινων παρὰ τούτους ἄλλων εὐαγγέλια περιεχούσας, ἢ ὡς Ἀνδρέου καὶ Ἰω- άννου καὶ τῶν ἄλλων ἀποστόλων πράξεις, ὧν οὐδὲν οὐδαμῶς ἐν συγγράμματι τῶν κατὰ τὰς διαδοχὰς ἐκκλησιαστικῶν τις ἀνὴρ εἰς μνήμην ἀγαγεῖν ἠξίωσεν.
English · Claude translation
We have nevertheless necessarily made a list of these too, distinguishing the writings that according to church tradition are true, genuine, and acknowledged, from the others besides these, which are not canonical but disputed, yet known to most churchmen; so that we may be able to know both these and those put forward by the heretics under the name of the apostles, containing Gospels of Peter, Thomas, Matthias, or some others besides them, or Acts of Andrew, John, and the other apostles, none of which any churchman in the succession has ever thought worthy of mention in his writings.
About this passage
Cite this passage
Eusebius, Hist. eccl. 3.25.6 (trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/eusebius-historia/3/25/6/).
Plain text
Eusebius, Hist. eccl. 3.25.6 (trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/eusebius-historia/3/25/6/).
Download citation:BibTeX ·RIS (Zotero, EndNote)
Whole work:BibTeX ·RIS ·Markdown text