Sermons to the People 162.1–162.4

Latin text: PL 38 (Latin text: Migne, PL 38, digitized by Open Greek and Latin (patrologia_latina-dev, University of Leipzig), CC BY-SA 4.0).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0). Compare: NPNF 1/6: Sermons on Selected Lessons of the New Testament (R. G. MacMullen, ed., 1888).

Show

Chapter 162

162.1PL 38:519

Quæstio de Epistola Corinthiorum beati Pauli apostoli, ubi dicit, Omne peccatum quodcumque fecerit homo, extra corpus est; qui autem fornicatur, in corpus proprium peccat; nescio si possit ad liquidum dissolvi, quamvis possit, donante Domino, aliquid inde probabiliter dici: ita enim profunda est. Nam cum superius in eadem Epistola Apostolus diceret, Nolite errare: neque fornicatores, neque idolis servientes, neque adulteri, neque molles, neque masculorum concubitores, neque fures, neque avari, neque ebriosi, neque maledici, neque rapaces regnum Dei possidebunt: et paulo post, Nescitis, ait, quoniam corpora vestra membra sunt Christi? Tollens ergo membra Christi, faciam membra meretricis? Absit. An nescitis quia qui adheret meretrici, unum corpus est? Erunt enim, inquit, duo in carne una. Qui autem adhæret Domino, unus spiritus est. Fugite fornicationem: atque ibi subjunxit, Omne peccatum quodcumque fecerit homo, extra corpus est; qui autem fornicatur, in corpus proprium peccat. An nescitis quia corpus vestrum, templum in vobis Spiritus sancti est, quem habetis a Deo, et non estis vestri? Empti enim estis pretio magno: glorificate et portate Deum in corpore vestro: cum ergo multa et horrenda in boc capitulo prius enumerasset hominum peccata, quibus non dabitur regnum Dei, quæ tamen nonnisi per corpus perpetrari ab hominibus possunt; quod corpus utique jam fidelium, templum esse dicit Spiritus sancti, quem habemus a Deo; ipsaque membra corporis nostri, membra esse asseverat Christi: de quibus arguendo et quodam modo interrogando, ait: Tollens ergo membra Christi, faciam membra meretricis? responderitque sibi, Absit; subjungat adhuc et dicat, Nescitis quoniam qui adhæret meretrici, unum corpus est. Erunt enim, inquit, duo in carne una: qui autem adhæret Domino, unus spiritus est; et concludat, Fugite fornicationem: sequitur tamen ipse, et dicit, Omne peccatum quodcumque fecerit homo, extra corpus est; qui autem fornicatur, in corpus proprium peccat; quasi vero illa quæ dinumeravit peccata, dicens, Nolite errare: neque fornicatores, neque idolis servientes, neque adulteri, neque molles, neque masculorum concubitores, neque fures, neque avari, neque ebriosi, neque maledici, neque rapaces, regnum Dei possidebunt; ista omnia facinora et flagitia, numquid nonnisi per corpus fieri aut exerceri possunt? Quis hoc sani capitis homo negaverit? Totum quippe istum locum Apostolus, propter ipsum corpus jam emptum pretio magno, id est, Christi sanguine pretioso, templum Spiritus sancti factum a Domino, ne talibus flagitiis pollueretur, sed potius inviolatum tanquam Dei habitaculum servaretur, agebat et defendebat. Quare ergo subjungere voluit hoc, unde difficilis quæstio nasceretur; id est, ut diceret, Omne peccatum quodcumque fecerit homo, extra corpus est; qui autem fornicatur, in corpus suum peccat: cum sive ipsa fornicatio, sive alia hujusmodi, quæ nonnisi per corpus fiunt peccata turpitudini et fornicationi simillima, nonnisi per ipsum corpus gerantur atque exerceantur? Quid enim? poteritne esse quispiam (ut cætera superius memorata taceam) fur, vel ebriosus, vel maledicus, vel rapax, extra operationem corporis hujus? Quamvis nec ipsa idololatria neque ipsa avaritia, præter servitium corporis hujus poterit ad usum fructumque suum pervenire. Quid est ergo, Omne peccatum quodcumque fecerit homo, extra corpus est; qui autem fornicatur, in corpus proprium peccat? Primum, quia in corpore isto homo constitutus, quidquid solo tantum animo poterit inique concupiscere, dici non potest extra corpus hoc hominem facere, cum constet eum carnali sensu et carnali prudentia hoc agere, isto adhuc circumseptum corpore. Nam et quod in Psalmo scriptum est, Dixit impius in corde suo, Non est Deus: idem beatus Paulus apostolus non potuit utique separare a corporali opere, illo loco ubi ait, Omnes astabimus ante tribunal Christi, ut recipiat unusquisque secundum ea quæ per corpus gessit, sive bonum, sive malum. Quia videlicet nonnisi in corpore constitutus impius potuit dicere, Non est Deus. Ut taceam quod in alia Epistola ipse Doctor Gentium dicit, Manifesta autem sunt opera carnis: et exsequitur, Qua sunt fornicationes, immunditiæ, luxuriæ, veneficia, inimicitiæ, contentiones, æmulationes, animositates, dissensiones, hæreses, invidiæ, ebrietates, et his similia; quæ prædico vobis, sicut prædixi, quia qui talia agunt, regnum Dei non possidebunt. Numquid enim non videtur nobis extra corpus fieri cætera illa quæ ibi interposuit, æmulationes, animositates, dissensiones, invidias, hæreses? et tamen operibus carnis ista tribuit Doctor Gentium in fide et veritate. Quid est ergo, Omne peccatum quodcumque fecerit homo, extra corpus est; et unum tantummodo fornicationis peccatum nominans, ait: Qui autem fornicatur, in corpus proprium peccat?

The question from the Epistle to the Corinthians of the blessed apostle Paul, where he says, “Every sin that a man commits is outside the body; but he who commits sexual immorality sins against his own body,” I do not know whether it can be resolved clearly, although, God granting, something can be said about it with probability: so deep is it. For earlier in the same Epistle the Apostle said: “Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor the effeminate, nor men who lie with males, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor robbers will possess the kingdom of God”; and a little after: “Do you not know,” he says, “that your bodies are members of Christ? Shall I then take the members of Christ and make them members of a prostitute? Far from it. Or do you not know that he who joins himself to a prostitute is one body? For the two, he says, will be in one flesh. But he who joins himself to the Lord is one spirit. Flee sexual immorality.” And there he added: “Every sin that a man commits is outside the body; but he who commits sexual immorality sins against his own body. Or do you not know that your body is the temple in you of the Holy Spirit, whom you have from God, and you are not your own? For you were bought at a great price: glorify and carry God in your body.” So when in this chapter he had first listed many dreadful sins of men, to which the kingdom of God will not be given, and which nevertheless men cannot commit except through the body—which body, of the faithful at least, he says is the temple of the Holy Spirit, whom we have from God, and whose members, the members of our body, he asserts are members of Christ; of which, rebuking and in a way questioning, he says, “Shall I then take the members of Christ and make them members of a prostitute?”, and answers himself, “Far from it”; and adds further, “Do you not know that he who joins himself to a prostitute is one body? For the two, he says, will be in one flesh; but he who joins himself to the Lord is one spirit”; and concludes, “Flee sexual immorality”—he nevertheless goes on and says, “Every sin that a man commits is outside the body; but he who commits sexual immorality sins against his own body”: as though the sins he listed when he said, “Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor the effeminate, nor men who lie with males, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor robbers will possess the kingdom of God”—as though all these crimes and outrages could be done or carried out otherwise than through the body! Who of sound mind would deny this? For the Apostle was treating and defending that whole passage for the sake of the body itself, already bought at a great price, that is, by the precious blood of Christ, made by the Lord a temple of the Holy Spirit, so that it might not be polluted by such outrages but rather kept inviolate as God's dwelling. Why then did he want to add this, from which a difficult question would arise—that is, to say, “Every sin that a man commits is outside the body; but he who commits sexual immorality sins against his own body”—when both sexual immorality itself and other such sins, which are done only through the body and are very like shamefulness and sexual immorality, are carried out and practiced only through the body itself? For what? Can anyone be (to say nothing of the others mentioned above) a thief, or a drunkard, or a reviler, or a robber, apart from the action of this body? Although neither idolatry itself nor greed itself can attain its use and enjoyment apart from the service of this body. What then is “Every sin that a man commits is outside the body; but he who commits sexual immorality sins against his own body”? First, because when a man is set in this body, whatever he can wickedly desire with the mind alone cannot be said to be done by the man outside this body, since it is plain that he does it with carnal sense and carnal prudence while still enclosed in this body. For also what is written in the Psalm, “The ungodly said in his heart, There is no God,” the same blessed apostle Paul certainly could not separate from bodily action, in that place where he says, “We shall all stand before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each may receive according to what he has done through the body, whether good or evil”: because, of course, only when set in the body could the ungodly say, “There is no God.” Not to mention that in another Epistle the Teacher of the Gentiles himself says, “Now the works of the flesh are plain,” and goes on: “which are sexual immorality, impurity, licentiousness, sorcery, enmities, strife, jealousy, anger, dissensions, heresies, envy, drunkenness, and the like; of which I tell you beforehand, as I told you before, that those who do such things will not possess the kingdom of God.” Do not the others he inserted there—jealousy, anger, dissensions, envy, heresies—seem to us to be done outside the body? And yet the Teacher of the Gentiles, in faith and truth, assigns these to the works of the flesh. What then is “Every sin that a man commits is outside the body,” and, naming only the one sin of sexual immorality, he says, “But he who commits sexual immorality sins against his own body”?

1 Cor 6:18 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 6:9–10 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 6:15–20 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 2:24 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 14:1 (13:1 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Cor 5:10 (quotation, high confidence) · Gal 5:19–21 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Augustine poses the difficulty of 1 Corinthians 6:18: how can every other sin be “outside the body” when all the sins Paul lists, even those of the mind, are done in or through the body?

  • Sermon 162 is printed as a fragment. Quotations: 1 Cor 6:9–10, 15–20 (Augustine's text adds “and carry” in 6:20); Gen 2:24; Ps 14:1 (13:1 Vulg.); 2 Cor 5:10; Gal 5:19–21. The list of sins is translated as quoted.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slips; OCR slips; stray footnote mark): Quæstio de Epistola Coriulhiorum beati Pauli apostoli, ubi dicil → Quæstio de Epistola Corinthiorum beati Pauli apostoli, ubi dicit; Erunt enitn, inquit → Erunt enim, inquit; prius enumerasset hominum peccata, quibus non dabitur regnum Dei, quæ tamen nounisi per corpus → prius enumerasset hominum peccata, quibus non dabitur regnum Dei, quæ tamen nonnisi per corpus; unus spiritus eat; et concludat → unus spiritus est; et concludat; fieri aut exerceri possunt 1? Quis hoc sant capitis homo negaverit? Totum quippe ittum locum → fieri aut exerceri possunt? Quis hoc sani capitis homo negaverit? Totum quippe istum locum; Quare ergo suhjungere voluit hoc, unde difficilis quæstio nascerctur → Quare ergo subjungere voluit hoc, unde difficilis quæstio nasceretur; peccata turpiludini et fornicationi → peccata turpitudini et fornicationi; Quid enim i poteritne esse quispiam → Quid enim? poteritne esse quispiam; extra corpus eat; qui autem fornicatur, in corpus proprium peccat? Primum → extra corpus est; qui autem fornicatur, in corpus proprium peccat? Primum; Dixit impius in corde suo, Non eat Dens: → Dixit impius in corde suo, Non est Deus:; secundum ea quæ per corpus genii → secundum ea quæ per corpus gessit; impius potuit dicere, Non eat Deus. → impius potuit dicere, Non est Deus.; dissensiones, hærese, invidiæ → dissensiones, hæreses, invidiæ; regnum Dei noa possidebunt. Nuinquid enim → regnum Dei non possidebunt. Numquid enim; quæ ibi imterposuit, æmulationes, animositales → quæ ibi interposuit, æmulationes, animositates; et tamen oporibus carnis ista tribuit Doctor Centium in fide ct veritate → et tamen operibus carnis ista tribuit Doctor Gentium in fide et veritate.

Topics: Ethics

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 162.1 (PL 38:519; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/162-1/#p-162-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-162-1) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).

162.2PL 38:519–520

Apparet igitur cuivis tardo et obtunso, quam sit ista quæstio difficilis: quam Dominus piæ intentioni nostræ, si aliquantulum dignatus fuerit dilucescere atque revelare, poterimus aliquid rationabiliter dicere. Videtur enim beatus Apostolus, in quo loquebatur Christus, aut exaggerare voluisse fornicationis malum super cætera omnia peccata, quæ etsi per corpus committantur; non tamen animum humanum concupiscentiæ carnali ita efficiunt obstrictum et obnoxium, quemadmodum in solo opere fornicationis corporalis, commisceri facit animum vis ingens libidinis cum ipso corpore, et unum cum ipso quodam modo agglutinari et devinctum esse; in tantum ut nihil aliud ipso momento et experimento hujus tam magni flagitii cogitare homini liceat, aut intendere, nisi quod sibimet addicit mentem, quam captivam subdit ipsa submersio, et quodam modo absorptio libidinis et concupiscentiæ carnalis; ut hoc esse videatur quod dictum est, Qui autem fornicatur, in corpus proprium peccat: quia tunc fit proprie et familiariter servum corporis cor hominis fornicantis, in tempore maxime ipsius nequissimæ operationis: in tantum ut ipse Apostolus inculcatius volens commendare cavendum hominibus hoc malum, dixerit, Tollens ergo membra Christi, faciam membra meretricis? et exsecrans atque detestans responderit, Absit. An nescitis, inquit, quoniam qui adhæret meretrici unum corpus est? Erunt enim, inquit, duo in carne una. Numquid hoc posset dici de aliis atque aliis quibuscumque facinoribus hominum? Liberum est enim animo humano in aliis quibusque sceleribus, et unum aliquid eorum operari, et eo ipso tempore alibi cogitatione distendi: quod in fornicationis ipso opere atque tempore non licet animo, ad aliud aliquid cogitandum liberum esse. Sic enim totus homo absorbetur ab ipso et in ipso corpore, ut jam dici non possit ipse animus suus esse; sed simul totus homo dici possit quod caro sit, et spiritus vadens et non revertens. Sic ergo possumus intelligere, quia omne peccatum quodcumque fecerit homo, extra corpus est; qui autem fornicatur, in corpus proprium peccat: ut videatur, ut dixi, Apostolus in tantum exaggerare voluisse fornicationis malum, ut in comparatione hujus fornicationis, cætera extra corpus habenda esse duxerit quæcumque peccata; solo hoc tantummodo fornicationis malo in corpus proprium peccari dixerit, quia majore libidinis ardore, quo superior nullus est, voluptas ipsius corporis tenet servum, efficitque captivum.

It is plain, then, to anyone however slow and dull, how difficult this question is; if the Lord deigns to shed a little light on it and reveal it to our devout attention, we shall be able to say something reasonable. For the blessed Apostle, in whom Christ spoke, seems to have wanted to exaggerate the evil of sexual immorality above all other sins: these, even if committed through the body, do not make the human mind so bound and subject to carnal desire as, in the act of bodily sexual immorality alone, the huge force of lust makes the mind mingle with the body itself and in a way be glued to it into one and bound fast; so much so that at that very moment and in the experience of so great an outrage a man is not able to think of or attend to anything else, except that the submersion, and in a way the absorption, of lust and carnal desire claims for itself the mind it subjects as a captive. So this would seem to be what was said: “But he who commits sexual immorality sins against his own body”: because then the heart of the man committing sexual immorality becomes properly and intimately the slave of the body, especially at the time of that most wicked act. So much so that the Apostle himself, wanting to impress more forcefully on men that this evil must be avoided, said, “Shall I then take the members of Christ and make them members of a prostitute?”, and, cursing and detesting it, answered, “Far from it. Or do you not know,” he says, “that he who joins himself to a prostitute is one body? For the two, he says, will be in one flesh.” Could this be said of any other crimes of men? For in any other crimes the human mind is free both to perform one of them and at the same time to be stretched out in thought elsewhere; but in the very act and time of sexual immorality the mind is not allowed to be free to think of anything else. For the whole man is so absorbed by and in the body itself that it can no longer be said that the mind is its own; but the whole man together can be said to be flesh, “and a spirit going and not returning.” So we can understand that “every sin that a man commits is outside the body; but he who commits sexual immorality sins against his own body,” in this way: that the Apostle, as I said, seems to have wanted to exaggerate the evil of sexual immorality so much that, in comparison with it, he held all other sins whatever to be outside the body; and said that by this evil of sexual immorality alone one sins against one's own body, because by the greater heat of lust, than which none is greater, the pleasure of the body itself holds him as a slave and makes him captive.

1 Cor 6:18 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 6:15–16 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 2:24 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 78:39 (77:39 Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: First solution: Paul magnifies sexual immorality above other sins because in it alone lust so absorbs the mind into the body that it becomes the body's slave and can think of nothing else.

  • Quotations: 1 Cor 6:18, 15–16; Gen 2:24; Ps 78:39 (77:39 Vulg.).

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slips): Apparct igitur cuivis tardo → Apparet igitur cuivis tardo; dignatus fuerit dilucescere atquc revelare → dignatus fuerit dilucescere atque revelare; quæ ctsi per corpus committantur → quæ etsi per corpus committantur; quod dictum esi, Qui aulum fornicatur → quod dictum est, Qui autem fornicatur; quia tunc fit proprio et familiariter → quia tunc fit proprie et familiariter; faciam membra meretricis? ct exsecrans → faciam membra meretricis? et exsecrans; qui adhæret meretrici utium corpus est? → qui adhæret meretrici unum corpus est?; et unum aliquid eorum opcrari, et eo ipso tempore alibi cogitalione distendi → et unum aliquid eorum operari, et eo ipso tempore alibi cogitatione distendi; absorbemur ab ipso ct in ipso corpore → absorbetur ab ipso et in ipso corpore; Sic crgo possumus intelligere → Sic ergo possumus intelligere.

Topics: Ethics

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 162.2 (PL 38:519–520; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/162-1/#p-162-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-162-2) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).

162.3PL 38:520

Hæc dicta sint de speciali fornicatione hujus corporis. Verum quia non solum fornicatio in sacris Litteris specialiter, sed etiam generaliter arguitur et nominatur; conemur, Deo adjuvante, et hinc aliquid probabiliter dicere. Generalis igitur fornicatio aperte manifestatur in Psalmo, ubi dicitur: Quoniam ecce qui longe se faciunt a te, peribunt; perdidisti omnem qui fornicatur abs te. Ubi subsequenter, qualiter ista generalis fornicatio evadi et effugi possit, adjunxit dicens: Mihi autem adhærere Deo bonum est ( Psal. LXXII, 27,28). Ut exinde facile advertamus, illam esse generalem fornicationem animæ humanæ, qua non adhærens quisque Deo, adhæret mundo. Unde beatus apostolus Joannes dicit: Si quis dilexerit mundum, dilectio Patris non est in eo. Et apostolus Jacobus dicit: Adulteri, nescitis quia amicitia hujus mundi inimica est Deo? Breviter ergo definitum est, non posse habere dilectionem Dei, qui habuerit dilectionem mundi; et inimicum esse Dei, qui amicus esse voluerit mundi. Ad hoc etiam pertinet quod Dominus in Evangelio dicit: Nemo potest duobus dominis servire: aut enim unum odio habebit, et alterum diliget; aut unum patietur, et alterum contemnet. Et concludit: Non potestis Deo servire et mammonæ. Ista est ergo generalis, ut dictum est, animæ fornicatio, omnia omnino in se continens, qua non adhæretur Deo, dum adhæretur mundo: ut sic etiam intelligere valeamus, secundum istam generalem fornicationem, quod ait Apostolus, Omne peccatum quodcumque fecerit homo, extra corpus est; qui autem fornicatur, in corpus proprium peccat. Quia si non fornicetur anima humana, adhærendo Deo, nec adhærendo mundo, quæcumque alia peccata, a concupiscentia carnali prorsus aliena potuerit pro ipsa fragilitate mortalitatis, vel ignorando, vel negligendo, vel obliviscendo, vel non intelligendo homo incurrere, hoc sit quod dictum est, Omne peccatum quodcumque fecerit homo, extra corpus est: quia nullum hic corporalis vel temporalis concupiscentiæ peccatum poterit reperiri; unde merito extra corpus esse quodlibet tale peccatum, dici videtur. Quod si adhærens mundo mundanus homo, longe se facit a Deo, fornicando ab ipso Deo, in corpus proprium peccat: quia corporali concupiscentia in quæque temporalia et carnalia, carnali sensu et prudentia humanus animus trahitur, atque distrahitur creaturæ serviens potius quam Creatori, qui est benedictus in sæcula.

Let this be said about the special sexual immorality of this body. But because sexual immorality is reproved and named in the sacred Scriptures not only specially but also generally, let us try, with God's help, to say something probable on this too. General sexual immorality, then, is plainly shown in the Psalm, where it is said: “For behold, those who make themselves far from you will perish; you have destroyed everyone who commits fornication away from you.” Where, next, he added how this general fornication can be escaped and avoided, saying: “But for me it is good to cleave to God.” So from this we may easily notice that the general fornication of the human soul is that by which one, not cleaving to God, cleaves to the world. Hence the blessed apostle John says: “If anyone loves the world, the love of the Father is not in him.” And the apostle James says: “Adulterers, do you not know that friendship with this world is hostile to God?” So it is briefly defined that one who has love of the world cannot have love of God, and that one who wants to be a friend of the world is an enemy of God. To this also belongs what the Lord says in the Gospel: “No one can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will put up with the one and despise the other.” And he concludes: “You cannot serve God and mammon.” This, then, as has been said, is the general fornication of the soul, containing in itself absolutely everything, by which one does not cleave to God while cleaving to the world. So that in this way, according to this general fornication, we may also be able to understand what the Apostle says, “Every sin that a man commits is outside the body; but he who commits sexual immorality sins against his own body.” For if the human soul does not commit fornication—cleaving to God, and not cleaving to the world—whatever other sins, wholly foreign to carnal desire, a man may incur through the very frailty of mortality, whether by ignorance, negligence, forgetfulness, or failure to understand, let this be what was said, “Every sin that a man commits is outside the body”: because no sin of bodily or temporal desire can be found here; so any such sin seems rightly said to be outside the body. But if the worldly man, cleaving to the world, makes himself far from God, committing fornication away from God himself, he sins against his own body: because the human mind is drawn and pulled apart by bodily desire toward all things temporal and carnal, with carnal sense and prudence, “serving the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed for ever.”

Ps 73:27–28 (72:27-Ps Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence) · 1 John 2:15 (quotation, high confidence) · Jas 4:4 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 6:24 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 6:18 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 1:25 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Second solution: Scripture also speaks of a general fornication, the soul's cleaving to the world instead of God; in this sense whoever loves the world sins against his own body, while other sins of frailty are outside it.

  • Quotations: Ps 73:27–28 (72:27–28 Vulg.); 1 John 2:15; Jas 4:4; Matt 6:24; Rom 1:25. In this paragraph fornicatio is used figuratively (unfaithfulness to God) and is rendered “fornication” where the Psalm's image requires it.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (Migne's marginal heading left in the text; OCR slip; OCR slips): Generalis fornicatio, qua non adhæretur Deo. Hæc dicta sint → Hæc dicta sint; scd eliam generaliter arguitur et nominatur; concmur, Deo adjuvante, et hinc aliquid probahiliter dicere. Generalis igitur fornicatio aperte nianifestatur → sed etiam generaliter arguitur et nominatur; conemur, Deo adjuvante, et hinc aliquid probabiliter dicere. Generalis igitur fornicatio aperte manifestatur; Quoniam ecce qni longe se faciunt a te → Quoniam ecce qui longe se faciunt a te; Ubi subsequenter, qnalitcr ista generalis fornicatio evadi ct efTugi possit → Ubi subsequenter, qualiter ista generalis fornicatio evadi et effugi possit; illam esse generalcm fornicationem → illam esse generalem fornicationem; dilectio Patris non eat in eo → dilectio Patris non est in eo; amicitia hujus mundi inimica eat Deo? Breviter ergo definitum est, non posse habere dilcctionem nei, qui habuerit dilectionem mundi; et inimicum esse Dci → amicitia hujus mundi inimica est Deo? Breviter ergo definitum est, non posse habere dilectionem Dei, qui habuerit dilectionem mundi; et inimicum esse Dei; Ad hoc eliam pertinet → Ad hoc etiam pertinet; Non potestis Deo servire ei mammonæ → Non potestis Deo servire et mammonæ; ut sic eliam intelligere valeamus, secundum istam generalem fornicationcm → ut sic etiam intelligere valeamus, secundum istam generalem fornicationem; Quia si non fornicetur auima humana → Quia si non fornicetur anima humana; hoc sit quod dictum cst → hoc sit quod dictum est; dici vidctur → dici videtur; carnali sensu ct prudentia → carnali sensu et prudentia; qui est bcnedictus in sæcula → qui est benedictus in sæcula.

Topics: Ethics

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 162.3 (PL 38:520; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/162-1/#p-162-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-162-3) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).

162.4PL 38:520–521

Sic ergo, quantum mihi videtur, salva fide, intelligi potest utriusque fornicationis malum, tam specialis, quam universalis, in hoc uno capitulo tanti et tam magni doctoris, ubi ait, Omne peccatum quodcumque fecerit homo, extra corpus est; qui autem fornicatur, in corpus proprium peccat: ut aut exaggeratio facta sit ab Apostolo hujus specialis fornicationis, qua in corpus proprium peccari recte intelligitur; quia nusquam sic totus homo corporis ipsius voluptati addicitur, et ineffabiliter vel inevitabiliter affigitur, ut in comparatione hujus tanti mali, cætera peccata extra corpus esse videantur, etiamsi per corpus exerceantur. Quemadmodum solius fornicationis vis quædam imperiosæ libidinis, conditioni suæ subdit, propriumque ipsius corporis mancipium pessimum facit, tempore maxime ipsius immundissimæ operationis; ut aliud quid præter quod agit in ipso corpore, non sit liberum humanæ menti vel cogitare, vel intendere. Si autem etiam generalem significare voluit Apostolus fornicationem, propter quam dixisse videatur, Omne peccatum quodcumque fecerit homo, extra corpus est: qui autem fornicatur, in corpus proprium peccat: sic accipiendum est et intelligendum, ut quisque dum non adhæret Deo, qui adhæret mundo, omnia temporalia diligens et concupiscens, merito in corpus proprium peccare dicatur, id est, universæ concupiscentiæ carnali deditus et subditus factus, tanquam totus creaturæ servus ab ipso Creatore alienus, per illam initium omnis peccati superbiam, cujus superbiæ initium est, ut scriptum est, apostatare a Deo. A quo generali fornicationis malo quisque alienus, quodcumque aliud peccatum potuerit ut homo corruptibilis adhuc et mortalis incurrere, hoc intelligatur extra corpus esse; id est, extra corporeæ et temporalis omnis concupiscentiæ malum, alienum esse, extra corpus, ut sæpe dictum est, esse. Tantummodo enim carnalis et generalis concupiscentiæ malo per omnia fornicatur anima a Deo, tanquam corporalibus et temporalibus desideriis et delectationibus illigata et devincta, in corpus proprium peccat, cujus universaliter concupiscentiæ serviens, incurvatur mundo, et alienatur a Deo: quod est, ut dictum est, Initium superbiæ hominis, apostatare a Deo. Propter quod generalis fornicationis cavendum malum, beatus Joannes admonet, dicens: Nolite diligere mundum, neque ea quœ sunt in mundo; quoniam quæ in mundo sunt, concupiscentia carnis est, et concupiscentia oculorum, et ambitio sæculi, quæ non est ex Patre, sed ex mundo. Et mundus transit, et concupiscentia ejus. Qui autem fecerit voluntatem Dei, manet in æternum, sicut ille manet in œternum. Ista ergo dilectio mundi, quæ universalem in se concupiscentiam continet mundi, generalis est fornicatio, qua peccatur in corpus proprium; eo quod omnibus corporalibus et visibilibus et temporalibus desideriis et voluptatibus humanus indesinenter servit animus, ab ipso Creatore universorum desolatus atque derelictus.

In this way, then, as it seems to me, without harm to the faith, the evil of both kinds of fornication, the special as well as the universal, can be understood in this one chapter of so great and eminent a teacher, where he says, “Every sin that a man commits is outside the body; but he who commits sexual immorality sins against his own body”: either the Apostle has exaggerated this special sexual immorality, by which one is rightly understood to sin against one's own body, because nowhere is the whole man so given over to the pleasure of the body itself, and so indescribably or inescapably fastened to it, that in comparison with so great an evil the other sins seem to be outside the body, even if they are carried out through the body; just as a certain force of imperious lust belonging to sexual immorality alone subjects a man to its condition and makes him the body's own worst slave, especially at the time of that most unclean act, so that the human mind is not free to think of or attend to anything other than what it is doing in the body. Or, if the Apostle also meant to signify the general fornication, on account of which he seems to have said, “Every sin that a man commits is outside the body; but he who commits fornication sins against his own body,” it must be taken and understood thus: that anyone who does not cleave to God but cleaves to the world, loving and desiring all temporal things, is rightly said to sin against his own body—that is, having become given over and subject to all carnal desire, as a creature wholly a slave and estranged from the Creator himself, through that pride which is the beginning of all sin, of which pride the beginning is, as it is written, to apostatize from God. Whoever is free from this general evil of fornication, whatever other sin he may incur, as a man still corruptible and mortal, let it be understood to be outside the body; that is, outside the evil of all bodily and temporal desire, foreign to it, outside the body, as has often been said. For only by the evil of carnal and general desire does the soul commit fornication in everything away from God, as one entangled and bound by bodily and temporal desires and delights; it sins against its own body, serving whose desire universally it is bent down to the world and estranged from God: which is, as has been said, “The beginning of man's pride is to apostatize from God.” Because of this, the blessed John warns that the evil of general fornication must be avoided, saying: “Do not love the world, nor the things that are in the world; for the things that are in the world are the desire of the flesh, and the desire of the eyes, and the ambition of the world, which is not from the Father but from the world. And the world passes away, and its desire. But he who does the will of God abides for ever, as he abides for ever.” So this love of the world, which contains in itself the universal desire of the world, is the general fornication by which one sins against one's own body; because the human mind ceaselessly serves all bodily, visible, and temporal desires and pleasures, abandoned and forsaken by the Creator of all things himself.

1 Cor 6:18 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 John 2:15–17 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Augustine sums up the two possible readings of 1 Corinthians 6:18: sexual immorality as the sin that most enslaves a person to the body, or the soul's general fornication, love of the world that turns away from God.

  • Quotations: 1 Cor 6:18; Sir 10:13, 12 (edition “Eccli. X, 15, 14”; “the beginning of all sin is pride,” “the beginning of man's pride is to apostatize from God”); 1 John 2:15–17 (Augustine's text adds “as he abides for ever”).

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slips): in hoc uno capitulo tanti et lam magni doctoris → in hoc uno capitulo tanti et tam magni doctoris; quia nusquam sic totus bomo corporis → quia nusquam sic totus homo corporis; non sit libcrum humanæ menti → non sit liberum humanæ menti; omnia temporalia diligens ct concupiscens → omnia temporalia diligens et concupiscens; deditus et subditus factus. tanquam tutus creaturæ servus ab ipso Crcatorc alienus, pcr illam initium omnis pectati superbiam, cujus superbiæ initium est, ut scri ptum est → deditus et subditus factus, tanquam totus creaturæ servus ab ipso Creatore alienus, per illam initium omnis peccati superbiam, cujus superbiæ initium est, ut scriptum est; potuerit ut homo corruptibilis adbuc et mortalis → potuerit ut homo corruptibilis adhuc et mortalis; alienum esse, cItra corpus, ut sæpe dicium est, esse. Tantummodo enim carnalis et generalis concupiscentiæ malo per oinnia fornicatur anima a Dco → alienum esse, extra corpus, ut sæpe dictum est, esse. Tantummodo enim carnalis et generalis concupiscentiæ malo per omnia fornicatur anima a Deo; Initium auperbia hominis, apostatare a Deo → Initium superbiæ hominis, apostatare a Deo; quoniam quœ in mundo sunt, concupiscentiacarnis est, et concupiscentia oculorum, et ambitio sœculi, quas non eat ex Patre, æd ex mundo → quoniam quæ in mundo sunt, concupiscentia carnis est, et concupiscentia oculorum, et ambitio sæculi, quæ non est ex Patre, sed ex mundo; humanus indesinenter servit aninius, ab ipso Creatore universorum desolatus atquc derelictus → humanus indesinenter servit animus, ab ipso Creatore universorum desolatus atque derelictus.

Extrabiblical texts: Sir 10:13 (Sirach [in RC, EO, ETH canons]; quotation); Sir 10:12 (Sirach [in RC, EO, ETH canons]; quotation)

Topics: Ethics

Cite (SBL): Augustine, Serm. 162.4 (PL 38:520–521; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/augustine-sermones/162-1/#p-162-4). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-augustine-sermones-162-4) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from the Latin of Migne's Patrologia Latina 38 (Maurist text; digital text, Open Greek and Latin; corrections logged). Sermons outside 51–147 have no public-domain English and were re-read against the Latin; sermons 51–147 were compared section by section with NPNF¹ 6 (MacMullen, 1888).