Commentary on Philippians
The whole work on one page. Select a passage number to open that passage with its notes, Scripture references, and citation.
Chapter 1
1.15PL 8:1198c–1198d
Posuit vel quatuor causas vel quatuor personas, quae annuntient Christum. Ex his duae, prima et novissima, ex malignitate: duae mediae, ex bono animo et voluntate. Quod inter se distent, prima et postrema: quod inter se, secunda et tertia, dicendum. Prima est de malignitate, propter invidiam et contemptionem: invidiam enim dixit quod sentiant cum aemuli nobis sint. Postrema etiam est et ipsa de malo, ut, quidam per contumaciam Christum pronuntiant. Id est ut nobis noceant. Cum enim aperte Christum negent, finxerunt se annuntiare; ut nos, qui eos adversarios putamus et credimus, doleamus ab his eadem pronuntiari quae nos pronuntiamus: per contumaciam enim, inquit, non sancte neque caste, pronuntiant Christum; sed ut nobis incutiant tribulationem et gemitum et dolorem; ut poenis et vinculis nostris se gaudere ostendant; quomodo dictum est ipsi Christo in cruce posito, si filius Dei es, libera te, ita et Paulo dicatur: Deus tuus a vinculis te liberet; ille Christus Deus, Deus est; sed tu tamen in poenis es Hoc igitur modo distat haec praedicatio malignorum ab illa superiore: Illa non ut poenas inserat vinculis apostoli, sed ut ipsi affectent gloriam praedicationis, cum per invidiam hoc faciant, non per intelligentiam et propriam voluntatem. At vero vel duplex causa, vel duplex persona, de bono sic se habet, quod quidam per bonam voluntatem Christum pronuntiant, quidam ex charitate. Hae duae causae de bono adversae sunt singulis de malo: namque ad primam respondit haec quae secunda est. Si enim primi, quia invident et quia contendunt, ideo praedicant Christum; contra quidam de bonis per bonam voluntatem Christum annuntiant vere hoc sentientes, non invidentes nobis, sed quia bonum est quod sentiunt et habent bonam voluntatem circa Evangelium. Tertia autem quae de bonis causa est, contraria est illi, quae postrema est de malis. Nam si illa quae de malis est postrema, talis est, ut quidam in nostram poenam et tribulationem per contumaciam Christum pronuntient; haec de bonis contraria est, quia quidam ex charitate pronuntiant: hoc est me sequentes et chari mihi, non mihi insultantes: scilicet, inquit, quod in defensione Evangelii positus sum. Sciunt enim quia in defensione Evangelii sum, et idcirco poenas has meas pro evangelio me sustinere; unde et ipsi ex charitate Christum pronuntiant, vel charitate in Christum vel charitate in me, non mihi insultantes, ut illi qui per contumaciam Christum praedicant; non caste, sed existimantes tribulationem se suscitare vinculis meis.
He has set down either four causes or four persons that proclaim Christ. Of these, two, the first and the last, are from malice; the two in the middle from a good mind and will. How the first and last differ from each other, and how the second and third, must be said. The first is from malice, through envy and contention: for he said “envy” because they feel that way, since they are rivals to us. The last too is itself from evil: as “some proclaim Christ out of contumacy.” That is, in order to harm us. For though they openly deny Christ, they have pretended to proclaim him, so that we, who think and believe them adversaries, may grieve that the same things we proclaim are proclaimed by them: for they proclaim Christ, he says, out of contumacy, not holily nor purely, but so as to strike us with tribulation and groaning and pain, so as to show that they rejoice in our punishments and chains; as it was said to Christ himself when he was placed on the cross, “If you are the Son of God, free yourself,” so it may be said to Paul: “May your God free you from your chains; that Christ God is God; yet you are in punishments.” In this way, then, this preaching of the malicious differs from that earlier one: that one is not to add punishments to the apostle’s chains, but so that they themselves may aim at the glory of preaching, since they do this through envy, not through understanding and their own will. But the double cause, or double person, from good stands thus: some proclaim Christ through good will, some out of love. These two causes from good are opposed one by one to those from evil: for this, which is second, answers to the first. For if the first preach Christ because they envy and contend, on the contrary some of the good proclaim Christ through good will, truly thinking so, not envying us, but because what they think is good and they have good will toward the gospel. And the third cause, which is from the good, is contrary to that which is last of the evil. For if the last of the evil is such that some proclaim Christ out of contumacy for our punishment and tribulation, this one of the good is contrary, because some proclaim out of love: that is, following me and dear to me, not insulting me: namely, he says, because I am placed in the defense of the gospel. For they know that I am in the defense of the gospel, and that therefore I endure these punishments of mine for the gospel; hence they too proclaim Christ out of love, either love toward Christ or love toward me, not insulting me, like those who preach Christ out of contumacy; not purely, but thinking to raise up tribulation for my chains.
1.18PL 8:1199a–1199b
Quid enim? dum omni modo sive sub obtentu sive veritate Christus annuntietur. Cum quatuor supra vel personas vel causas posuerit, ut Christus annuntietur, non se omnino motum a malignis quia Christum praedicant, declarat et ostendit. Frustra enim illi existimant tribulationem se suscitare vinculis meis. Quid enim, aut quare moveor? aut quare in tribulationem mittor? cum enim gaudeam laetusque sim quod per omnem modum annuntiatur Christus: sive dum illi aliquo, suo obtentu vel aliqua sua occasione vel nocendi vel invidendi praedicant Christum, dummodo praedicent, sive veritate pronuntient. Eventus enim mihi plurimum placet, quod de Christo pronuntiant; et Christum et nominant, et Deum, sub alio licet animo, fatentur et Dei Filium, Hoc enim cum celebratur, exercetur, agitur, sic annuntiatur Christus ab omnibus, et nos ad id pervenimus quod volumus ut Christus annuntietur. Quod si ita est. frustra existimarunt me in tribulationem mitti. Denique sic subjungit: Et in hoc gratulor, sed et gratulabor. Et gratulor, inquit, etiam in hoc ipso, quod annuntiatur Christus. Non enim negant etiam illi qui nocendi modo, ut mihi noceant, Christum annuntiant: neque illi qui per invidiam Christum annuntiant, animi causa, et latenter, et per maligna verba, tamen Christum confitentur, et Christum annuntiant: in hoc, inquit, gratulor et gratulabor.
“What then? Provided that in every way, whether under pretext or in truth, Christ is proclaimed.” Since he set down above four persons or causes for Christ’s being proclaimed, he declares and shows that he is not moved at all by the malicious because they preach Christ. For they think in vain that they are raising tribulation for my chains. For what, or why am I moved? Or why am I sent into tribulation? For I rejoice and am glad that Christ is proclaimed in every way: whether they preach Christ under some pretext of theirs or some occasion of their own for harming or envying—provided they preach—or proclaim him in truth. For the outcome pleases me greatly, that they proclaim Christ; and they both name Christ, and confess him God, though in another spirit, and the Son of God. For when this is celebrated, practiced, carried out, Christ is so proclaimed by all, and we arrive at what we wish, that Christ be proclaimed. If this is so, they thought in vain that I was sent into tribulation. Then he adds thus: “And in this I rejoice, and shall rejoice.” And I rejoice, he says, even in this very thing, that Christ is proclaimed. For even those who proclaim Christ by way of harming, to harm me, do not deny him; nor do those who proclaim Christ through envy, out of spite, secretly, and by malicious words, yet they confess Christ and proclaim Christ: in this, he says, I rejoice and shall rejoice.
1.19PL 8:1199b–1199d
Scio enim quoniam hoc mihi proveniet in salutem per orationem vestram, et subministrationem spiritus Christi Jesu. Pene audaciter ac temere libenter accepisse et in gaudium accepisse, quod quoque modo Christus annuntiaretur etiam ab improbis, etiam per contumaciam, etiam per invidiam: sed hoc ex fiducia Dei. et benevolentia, et, ut ipse ait, ex subministratione Christi et spiritus ejus confirmo futurum; et scio futurum, quoniam istud quoquo modo, quod pronuntiatur, erit verum, eritque etiam ita ut ipse ille Paulus vult, qui vere annuntiat: et idcirco ait, scio enim quod hoc mihi proveniat in salutem: ut hoc quod illi, vel in perniciem meam pronuntiant, qui per contumaciam Christum pronuntiant, vel illi qui per invidiam et contentionem Christum pronuntiant, omnia tamen ita scio, quoniam mihi proveniant in salutem, subministrante scilicet Christo et spiritu ejus: secundum, inquit, quod expecto, et spem habeo, ita mihi fiducia est, ut nunquam mihi ipsi noceant, etiamsi alia causa pro– nuntiant Christum, ut ego poenas patiar et crucier: tamen quoniam spes mea et expectatio est de Christo, proveniet id mihi in salutem.
“For I know that this will turn out for my salvation through your prayer and the supply of the Spirit of Christ Jesus.” Almost boldly and rashly he has gladly accepted, and accepted with joy, that Christ should be proclaimed in any way, even by the wicked, even out of contumacy, even through envy: but this from confidence in God and his goodwill, and, as he himself says, from the supply of Christ and his Spirit, I confirm will be; and I know it will be, since this which is proclaimed in any way will be true, and will even be as Paul himself wishes, who truly proclaims: and therefore he says, “for I know that this will turn out for my salvation”: so that what they proclaim, even for my ruin—those who proclaim Christ out of contumacy, or those who proclaim Christ through envy and contention—all of it, I know, will turn out for my salvation, with Christ and his Spirit supplying, namely. “According,” he says, “to what I expect,” and I have hope, so I have confidence that they will never harm me, even if they proclaim Christ for another reason, that I may suffer punishments and be tormented: yet since my hope and expectation is from Christ, this will turn out for my salvation.
1.20PL 8:1199d–1200b
Quoniam in nullo erubescam; sed in omni fiducia, quemadmodum semper, et nunc magnificabitur Christus in corpore meo. Sequebatur Uti non continuo in salutem provenire posset istud ipsum, quod maligni praedicant, quod per invidiam praedicant, quod per contumaciam praedicant, uti posset illi et perniciem afferre et poenas, ut in catenis semper esset, verum etiam et in morte, sed utrumque. Nam apostolus prospiciens dicit futurum esse ut Christus praedicetur quolibet in eventu: nunquam enim, inquit, erubescam, sed ex utroque et gaudio laetabor et gratulabor, et sicut semper et nunc magnificabitur, inquit, Christus: in corpore, inquit, meo; id est cum meum corpus poenis subjectum omnibus tolerat universa, et Christum praedicat, nec desistit, nec poenis terretur, et omnibus poenis non cedit. Quid est autem omnibus poenis, ipse exponit subjungendo sive per vitam, sive per mortem. Sive enim tolerando poenas vixero, praedicabitur Christus: sive sub poenis mortuus fuero, magis ac magis praedicabitur; cum videant omnes me nec poenis deterritum, nec morte revocatum, sed in evangelio aut vitam cum poenis exegisse, aut usque ad mortem poenas tolerasse, et tamen in evangelio praedicando perseverasse.
“Since I shall be ashamed in nothing; but with all confidence, as always, so now also Christ will be magnified in my body.” It followed that this very thing which the malicious preach, which they preach through envy, which they preach out of contumacy, might not straightway turn out for salvation, so that it could bring him ruin and punishments, so that he would always be in chains, and indeed even in death, but either way. For the apostle, looking ahead, says that it will come about that Christ is preached whatever the outcome: for never, he says, shall I be ashamed, but from either I shall be glad with joy and rejoice, and as always, so now Christ will be magnified, he says, in my body; that is, when my body, subjected to all punishments, endures everything, and preaches Christ, and does not desist, nor is frightened by punishments, nor yields to all punishments. What “all punishments” means he himself explains by adding, “whether by life or by death.” For whether I live by enduring punishments, Christ will be preached; or whether I die under punishments, he will be preached more and more, when all see that I was neither deterred by punishments nor called back by death, but either spent my life in the gospel with punishments, or endured punishments even to death, and yet persevered in preaching the gospel.
1.21PL 8:1200b–1200d
Mihi enim vita Christus est et mori lu– crum. Non igitur mortem timeo, quia mori mihi lucrum est: non ipsa mors lucrum, sed mori: vita autem Christus est, quia qui in illo sperat, semper vivit, et nunc et postea. Etenim cum dixerit, in corpore meo magnificabitur Christus, sive per vitam sive per mortem, ad vitam istam referens; si vincit eos, qui sibi parant insidias, et perseverat in Evangelio, gloriabitur vita ejus, quia in Christo gloriatur, non in catenis, non in salute, non si nihil patiatur. Si autem occisus fuerit, lucrum est mori, cum illi vita sit Christus. Sic igitur singulis singula reddidit; ut ad mortem responderit, non timeo mortem, cum mihi vita sit Christus: sive in vita, sive in catenis licet me alligent, tamen mihi vita Christus est, et ipsum mori lucrum est, cum pervenio ad Christum. Sive utrumque hoc singulis superioribus datur, non timeo mortem, quia vita mihi Christus est, et mori lucrum est: sive cum vitae mihi in poena erit, non timeo vitam, quia vita mihi Christus est. Ergo illi nihil agunt, sive me morti tradant, sive in vita cruciatibus dedant: mihi enim utrumque non nocet, quia non est apud me in tormentis vita cum poena, propterea quia vita mihi Christus est: sive interficiant, non est mihi et ista poena, quia vita mihi Christus est, et mori lucrum.
“For to me life is Christ, and to die is gain.” So I do not fear death, because to die is gain for me: not death itself is gain, but dying: but life is Christ, because whoever hopes in him always lives, both now and afterward. For when he said, “Christ will be magnified in my body, whether by life or by death,” referring to this life: if he conquers those who lay snares for him and perseveres in the gospel, his life will glory, because it glories in Christ, not in chains, not in safety, not if he suffers nothing. But if he is killed, to die is gain, since Christ is life to him. So he has answered each with each; so that to death he answered, I do not fear death, since Christ is my life: whether in life, or in chains, though they bind me, yet Christ is my life, and dying itself is gain, since I come to Christ. Or each of these two is given to each of the preceding: I do not fear death, because Christ is my life and to die is gain; or, when life will be in punishment for me, I do not fear life, because Christ is my life. So they accomplish nothing, whether they hand me over to death or give me over to torments in life: for neither harms me, because for me there is no life in torments with punishment, since Christ is my life: or if they kill me, this too is no punishment to me, because Christ is my life and to die is gain.
1.22PL 8:1200d–1201a
Quod si vivere in carne, hic mihi fructus operis est. Quoniam supra dixit, vita mihi Christus est; et incertum quam vitam dixerit, utrum istam quae in carne, an illam quae postea; adjecit de Ista vita, quae hic in carne est, et dixit nihilominus etiam in ista vita, cum hic in carne vivimus, fructus est mihi, inquit, operis. Qui iste operis fructus? ut labore meo et Evangelio annuntiem Christum, et multis spem vitae et salvationis efficiam, cum sperare in Christum coeperint, et fidem Evangelio dare. Hic est, inquit, mihi fructus operis etiam in carne vivere. Et quid eligam ignoro. Sive enim moriar, quia mors lucrum est, ac mihi vita Christus est, et ad illum utique pervenio, cum morior hic in carne: sive rursus hic in carne vivam, quia mihi fructus est operis annuntiare Christum et evangelizare; quid eligam. inquit, nescio; utrum mortem appetam, an adhuc in vita maneam.
“But if to live in the flesh, this is the fruit of work for me.” Since he said above, “to me life is Christ,” and it was uncertain which life he meant, whether this one in the flesh or that one afterward, he added about this life which is here in the flesh, and said that nevertheless even in this life, while we live here in the flesh, there is fruit for me, he says, of work. What is this fruit of work? That by my labor and the gospel I proclaim Christ and bring about for many the hope of life and salvation, when they have begun to hope in Christ and to give faith to the gospel. This, he says, is for me the fruit of work, even to live in the flesh. “And what I shall choose I do not know.” For whether I die, because death is gain, and Christ is my life, and I surely come to him when I die here in the flesh; or whether again I live here in the flesh, because to proclaim Christ and preach the gospel is fruit of work for me; which I shall choose, he says, I do not know: whether to seek death, or still to remain in life.
1.23PL 8:1201a–1201c
Coarctor autem ex duobus, concupiscentiam habens dissolvi et esse cum Christo, quanto magis optimum est. Ut vero autem in carne permaneam, necessarium propter vos. Duplex, inquit, me necessitas et cupiditas in divisa deducit; nam et habeo concupiscentiam dissolvi, id est discedere a corpore, et esse cum Christo; etiam illam, lucrum consequi; quod est quidem optimum et eligendum. Sed rursus est mihi in carne necessitas ut maneam et perseverem propter vos. Ita superiori parti concupiscentiam dedit dissolvi velle et esse cum Christo, quia summum est et praecipuum et optimum; hic autem ut in carne adhuc maneat necessitatem magis dixit, quam illam; ut propter hoc vivam, ut vos instruam, ut vos in Evangelio confirmem. Cum igitur duas veluti concupiscentias habeat, confirmat unam quod hic in carne adhuc manebit; et hoc confidenter scio, quoniam manebo, et permanebo vobis, ad vestrum profectum et gratiam fidei. Vere ut pater, vere ut famulus Dei, de duabus cupiditatibus suis illam quasi reliquet, quae ipsi tantum fuerat profutura, ut jam abiret, jam dissolveretur essetque cum Christo.
“But I am hard pressed between the two, having the desire to be dissolved and to be with Christ, which is far better. But that I remain in the flesh is necessary for your sake.” A double necessity and desire, he says, leads me in divided directions; for I have the desire to be dissolved, that is, to depart from the body, and to be with Christ; also that, to obtain the gain; which indeed is best and to be chosen. But again there is for me in the flesh the necessity to remain and persevere for your sake. So to the first part he gave desire, to wish to be dissolved and to be with Christ, because it is highest, chief, and best; but here, that he should still remain in the flesh, he called rather a necessity than that; so that for this reason I may live, to instruct you, to confirm you in the gospel. Since, then, he has as it were two desires, he confirms one, that he will still remain here in the flesh: and this I know with confidence, that I shall remain and continue with you for your progress and the grace of faith. Truly like a father, truly like a servant of God, of his two desires he as it were leaves aside that which would have profited him alone: to go away now, to be dissolved now, and to be with Christ.
1.25PL 8:1201c
Confido, inquit, et confidenter scio, quoniam Deus me hic adhuc esse faciet, ut permaneam; et permanebo, ut vobis omnibus prosim, et profectum habeatis ad gloriam fidei. Manebo, inquit, et adjecit amplius, et permanebo, id est, usque ad perfectionem manebo; perfectionem autem profectus vestri, ut proficiatis et gratiam consequamini, fidei scilicet; id est cum fidem praestatis a Deo gratiam mercamini.
I am confident, he says, and know with confidence that God will make me remain here still, so that I may remain; and I will continue, so that I may profit you all, and you may have progress toward the glory of faith. I will remain, he says, and he added more, “and I will continue,” that is, I will remain until perfection; the perfection of your progress, that you may advance and obtain grace, namely of faith; that is, when you offer faith you may earn grace from God.
1.26PL 8:1201c–1202a
Ut gloria et exultatio vestra abundet in Christo Jesu penes me, per proesentiam meam denuo apud vos. Ut cum apud vos esse iterum coepero, hoc est per proesentiam meam denuo ad vos, exultet gloria vestra, et abundet ipsa exaltatio in Christo Jesu penes me, per praesentiam meam denuo apud vos: id est ut ego praesens sentiam quemadmodum gloria vestra exultet et abundet in Christo, quod Christum diligitis, quod Christo servitis, quod Christo vos servire gaudetis.
“That your glory and exultation may abound in Christ Jesus with me, through my presence again with you.” So that when I have begun to be with you again—that is, “through my presence again with you”—your glory may exult, and that exultation may abound in Christ Jesus with me, through my presence again with you: that is, so that I, being present, may perceive how your glory exults and abounds in Christ, because you love Christ, because you serve Christ, because you rejoice to serve Christ.
1.27PL 8:1202a–1202c
Tantummodo digne in Evangelio Christi conversamini. Tota vitae summa Christianae ista est, in Evangelio Christo conversari, ipsum sibi annuntiare et caeteris, in ipso spem habere, omne quod agat ex mandatis ejus agere: hoc est digne in Evangelio Christi conversari. Sed et hoc parum est: ergo jungendum ut in Evangelio Christi conversemur ante omnia, et digne conversemur. Est digne conversari, secundum ejus praecepta vivere, et ea facere quae Christus praecipit. Ut sive cum venero, et videro vos; sive per absentiam, audiam de vobis quoniam statis in uno spiritu, una anima concertantes cum fide Evangelii. Ipse exponit quid sit digne in Evangelio Christi conversari, uno spiritu stantes, una anima concertantes cum fide Evangelii: Spiritu autem, inquit, stantes uno: quia unus est spiritus cum jam sapimus, et Evangelium sentimus, et ita vivimus. Animae autem opus hoc est, ut adversa corporis expellamus: ideo una, inquit, concertantes cum fide; quam fidem vo– bis Evangelium dedit. Ergo state, inquit, in uno spiritu, et colluctamini una anima cum fide Evangelii. Verum haec expositio illud continet quod supra dixit, digne in Evangelio Christi conversamini. Quomodo autem se habeant verba ut integra sibi et juncta sint, sic attendemus: conversamini, inquit, digne in Evangelio, ut digne vobis audiam quoniam statis in uno spiritu et una anima concertantes cum fide Evangelii. Audiam autem vel per absentiam; fides autem erit, ut cum audiam, credam, cum venero ad vos, et videro vos. Sive per absentiam audiam de vobis, jam ad utrumque videro vos, quoniam statis in uno spiritu.
“Only conduct yourselves worthily in the gospel of Christ.” The whole sum of the Christian life is this: to conduct oneself in the gospel of Christ, to proclaim him to oneself and to others, to have hope in him, to do whatever one does from his commandments: this is to conduct oneself worthily in the gospel of Christ. But even this is too little: so it must be joined that we conduct ourselves in the gospel of Christ before all things, and conduct ourselves worthily. To conduct oneself worthily is to live according to his precepts and do what Christ commands. “So that whether I come and see you, or, being absent, I hear of you, that you stand in one spirit, with one soul striving together with the faith of the gospel.” He himself explains what it is to conduct oneself worthily in the gospel of Christ: “standing in one spirit, with one soul striving together with the faith of the gospel.” “Standing,” he says, “in one spirit”: because the spirit is one when we are now wise, and perceive the gospel, and live so. And the work of the soul is this, that we drive out the adversities of the body: therefore “with one,” he says, “soul striving together with faith,” which faith the gospel gave you. So stand, he says, in one spirit, and struggle together with one soul with the faith of the gospel. But this exposition contains what he said above, “conduct yourselves worthily in the gospel of Christ.” How the words stand so as to be whole and joined to one another we shall consider thus: conduct yourselves, he says, worthily in the gospel, so that I may hear worthily of you that you stand in one spirit and with one soul strive together with the faith of the gospel. And I shall hear, or even in absence; and there will be faith, so that when I hear, I may believe, when I come to you and see you. Or in absence I shall hear of you, as I shall see you in either case, that you stand in one spirit.
1.28PL 8:1202c–1202d
Et nec in quocumque territi sitis ab adversariis: et hoc opus pertinet ad expositionem quod est digne in Evangelio Christi conversari, numquam terreri ab adversariis, nec in aliquo terreri: quandoquidem est illis declaratio interitus, nobis autem salutis. Hoc, inquit, non terreri Evangelio servientes. Id est omnis actus christiani ad salutem est, non conturbari ab adversis, fidem Evangelii credere in Christo, pati pro Christo, simulque etiam ut sciamus ex Dei gratia provenire. Ergo haec, inquit, res non terreri in aliquo ab adversariis, et nobis ad salutem est et nostris adversariis causa est ad interitum: et hoc tamen donum est Dei. Et hoc a Deo: ne operae nostrae putemus esse, quod non terreri causa nobis est ad salutem: nam et hoc a Deo est, sicuti frequenter monui, ut Dei nutu et misericordia et gratia fiant omnia.
“And are in nothing terrified by your adversaries”: and this work too belongs to the exposition of what it is to conduct oneself worthily in the gospel of Christ: never to be terrified by adversaries, nor terrified in anything. “Since for them it is a declaration of destruction, but for us of salvation.” This, he says, is not to be terrified, for those who serve the gospel. That is, every act of a Christian is toward salvation: not to be troubled by adversities, to believe the faith of the gospel in Christ, to suffer for Christ, and at the same time to know that it comes from God’s grace. So this thing, he says, not to be terrified in anything by adversaries, is both for our salvation and for our adversaries a cause of destruction: and yet this is the gift of God. “And this from God”: lest we think it is our own work that not being terrified is a cause of salvation for us: for this too is from God, as I have often warned, so that all things come about by God’s will and mercy and grace.
1.29PL 8:1202d–1203b
Quoniam vobis donatum est a Christo. Omni exhortatione praecepta haec jungit: pertinet enim digne in Evangelio Christi conversari quid sit, sic ostendere secundum superiora praecepta: et nunc cum exhortatio adjungitur ut credant in Christo; neque tantum credant, sed ut etiam patiantur pro illo. Quae autem patiantur, subjungit: vel quae in me vidistis, vel quae de me audistis: hoc est enim digne in Evangelio Christi conversari, et hoc dono datum est nobis pro Christo, quoniam ille mysterium complevit, et ad liberationem nostram passus est omnia. Pro ipso igitur donum nobis dedit, ut credamus in eum. Magnum autem donum, si sola in eum fide tantam gratiam meremur. Sed ita credamus, ut etiam patiamur pro illo; hoc enim subjungit: Id ipsum certamen et agonem habentes, quem et vidistis in me, et audistis de me. Ut vos quoque credentes in Christo, patiamini omnia pro illo, id est propter ipsum. Facere enim omnia, neque in alium converti, et pro illo pati omnia, hoc est certamen: et hunc agonem habemus scilicet et contentionem et Intentionem, quae educit ad palmam et ad coronam. Hunc igitur agonem ne ignoretis, ipse est quem in me vidistis, scilicet de catenis, de carcere, de cunctis malis, quae perpessus est Paulus: quae utraque apud vos habent fidem me passum esse, cum aut audistis aut vidistis.
“Since it has been given to you by Christ.” He joins these precepts to the whole exhortation: for it pertains to showing what it is to conduct oneself worthily in the gospel of Christ, thus, according to the preceding precepts: and now when the exhortation is added that they should believe in Christ; and not only believe, but also suffer for him. And what they should suffer he adds: either what you have seen in me, or what you have heard about me: for this is to conduct oneself worthily in the gospel of Christ, and this has been given us as a gift for Christ’s sake, since he fulfilled the mystery and suffered all things for our liberation. For his sake, then, he gave us the gift of believing in him. And it is a great gift, if by faith in him alone we merit so great a grace. But let us so believe as also to suffer for him; for this he adds: “having the same contest and struggle which you both saw in me and heard about me.” So that you too, believing in Christ, may suffer all things for him, that is, for his sake. For to do all things, and not to turn to another, and to suffer all things for him, this is the contest: and we have this struggle, namely the contention and intention that leads to the palm and the crown. So that you may not be ignorant of this struggle, it is the one you saw in me, namely about the chains, the prison, all the ills which Paul endured: both of which have credibility with you that I suffered, since you either heard or saw.
Chapter 2
2.1PL 8:1203b–1204b
Si qua igitur advocatio in Christo, si qua consolatio dilectionis, si qua societas spiritus, si qua viscera et miserationes; implete gaudium meum, ut idem sentiatis omnes. Petiturus beneficium, ut gaudium suum Impleatur quod gaudium circa hoc mandatum est, ut idem sentiatis omnes, ut nullus discrepet (tunc enim et charitas et concordia est, idem sentientibus cunctis; et si concordia est, hoc habebit apostolus gaudium): ut ergo hoc impetret quod suum gaudium vult esse, per illorum unanimitatem, concordiam, eamdemque sententiam, et caetera similia, quasi rationem meritorum praemittit, quod ab ipsis meretur, ut impleatur gaudium suum circa hoc, ut idem omnes sentiant, et caetera. Meritorum autem rationes istae sunt, quia advocati simul in Christo sunt: advocat enim Deus in Christo nos; eos enim sanctificat, quos vocavit et elegit et quos ordinavit. Advocatio ergo prima est; si est, inquit, advocatio In Christo aliqua in nobis, quod simul vocati sumus, et vocati in Christo, et meritum meum erga vos; ergo Implete gaudium meum. Prima igitur haec ratio meritorum inter se, ut se invicem audiant: quod advo– cati sunt in Christo. Ex hoc autem quod advocati sunt in Christo, est etiam dilectio. Item adjungit si qua consolatio dilectionis. Cum enim in malis simus, et mundi malis laboremus, si nos invicem diligamus, Deus erit nobis consolatio dilectionis. Haec, inquit, igitur si est consolatio dilectionis, ut quia vos diligo, vos me consolemini in malis in quibus sum: implete ergo gaudium meum. Singulis ergo hoc adjungendum. Deinde adjecit, si qua societas spiritus. Bono ordine et hoc tertium: nam primum est advocari in Christo, deinde dilectionem habere: cum autem utrumque fuerit, ut jam et advocati in Christo sim, et consolationem habeant inter se dilectus et dilectionis, sine dubio est societas spiritus. Si qua, inquit, est societas spiritus. Audiamus illud, implete gaudium meum. Adjungit deinde, si qua viscera et miserationes. Unum enim corpus efficitur Ecclesiae, cum sibi vocati in Christo charitate junguntur, junguntur etiam spiritu, et fiunt eadem viscera et eaedem miserationes. Si qua igitur Viscera, si quae miserationis sint viscera, ad hoc ut vocatio sit in Christo, et societas In spiritu. Miserationes autem sunt ad hoc, si qua consolatio est dilectionis, ut omnis alterum consoletur, quod in malis semper in mundo sumus: quoniam viscera eadem sumus, miserationes invicem nobis praestare debemus. Sic ergo si qua viscera miserationis, implete gaudium meum. Quod autem gaudium, subjunxit, ut idem sentiatis, omnes id ipsum. Quid est idem sentiatis? supponit per subjecta, aut in quibus idem sentiant, aut quemadmodum idem sentiant: —Eamdem dilectionem exerceatis unanimes, unum sentientes, nihil per contentionem, neque per inanem gloriam, sed in humilitate sensus invicem vos ab alteris proecedi arbitrantes, Non sua propria tantum unusquisque vestrum perspiciat, sed aliorum singuli.
“If, then, there is any calling in Christ, if any consolation of love, if any fellowship of the spirit, if any affection and compassion, fulfill my joy, that you all think the same.” Being about to ask a favor, that his joy may be fulfilled—a joy commanded regarding this, that you all think the same, that no one disagree (for then there is both love and concord, when all think the same; and if there is concord, the apostle will have this joy)—so, then, that he may obtain what he wishes to be his joy, through their unanimity, concord, and same mind, and the rest like these, he sets forth first, as it were, an account of merits, which he deserves from them, that his joy may be fulfilled in this: that all think the same, and the rest. These are the grounds of merit: that they have been called together in Christ: for God calls us in Christ; for he sanctifies those whom he called and chose and ordained. Calling, then, is first; if there is, he says, any calling in Christ among us, that we have been called together, and called in Christ, and my merit toward you; then fulfill my joy. This, then, is the first ground of merit among them, that they listen to one another: that they have been called in Christ. And from the fact that they have been called in Christ there is also love. Likewise he adds, “if any consolation of love.” For since we are in evils, and labor under the evils of the world, if we love one another, God will be to us the consolation of love. If this, then, he says, is the consolation of love, that, since I love you, you console me in the evils in which I am: fulfill, then, my joy. This must be added to each. Then he added, “if any fellowship of the spirit.” In good order this is third too: for first is being called in Christ, then having love: and when both are present, so that they are both called in Christ and have among themselves the consolation of the beloved and of love, there is without doubt fellowship of the spirit. “If there is,” he says, “any fellowship of the spirit.” Let us hear that: “fulfill my joy.” Then he adds, “if any affection and compassion.” For one body of the church is made when those called in Christ are joined to one another by love; they are joined also by the spirit, and become the same heart and the same compassion. If, then, there is any heart, if there is a heart of compassion, to this end, that the calling be in Christ and the fellowship in the spirit. And compassion is for this, if there is any consolation of love: that each console the other, because we are always in evils in the world: since we are the same heart, we ought to show compassion to one another. So, then, if there is any heart of compassion, fulfill my joy. And what joy he added: “that you think the same, all the same thing.” What is “think the same”? He supplies it by what follows, either in what they should think the same or how they should think the same: “Exercise the same love, being of one soul, knowing one thing, doing nothing through contention or through vain glory, but in humility of mind each considering others to surpass him; let each of you look not only to his own things, but each to those of others.”
2.5PL 8:1204b–1207a
Hoc enim sentite in vobis quod et in Jesu Christo. Ut dixi, exhortatio ista est quam nunc exsequitur, praeceptis plenioribus: implete, inquit, gaudium meum, quibus in rebus effici potest: quae praecepta, Ut semper docuit, tenent quae facienda sunt, et Item quae non facienda. Quae facienda sunt, sic Subjungit, ut idem sentiatis omnes, eamdem dilectionem exerceatis omnes, unanimes, unum sentientes. Interponit quae non facienda, nihil per contentionem neque per inanem gloriam. Et subjungit quae facienda rursus, sed per humilitatem sensus invicem vos ab alteris proecedi arbitrantes. Item subjungit quae non facienda: non sua propria unusquisque perspiciat. Deinde id quod faciendum, sed aliorum singuli. Sic deinde Subjungit, quod ad exhortationem plurimum valet, et certam exhortationem de praeceptis, in qua conclusio prae– Cepti haec est, ut de aliorum recreatione singuli cogitent. Hoc, inquit, facere debetis et constituere et sentire in vobis, quod Christus fecit: quod de aliis cogitans, de se et de sua gloria nihil cogitavit: vel de eo quod potentiam suam, ut docebit, ipse deposuit, ut aliis caeteris subveniret. Ergo hoc tenetur in exhortatione, ut gaudium possit impleri ipsius Pauli. Videamus igitur singula quae praecepta sint. Primo ait ut idem, omnis christianitatis potestatis, et jus et operatio illa est non dissentire, sed unum atque idem in animo habere. Etenim si unus Deus, si unus ejus filius, si unus Spiritus sanctus est, si omnia ista tria unum, ita debemus et nos unum habere quod sentimus, ut idem sentiamus omnes. Deinde sequitur ut eamdem dilectionem exerceamus. Hoc jam ad moralem disciplinam, id est ad vitam pertinet; illud ad scientiam. Nam cum duo genera dixissem esse in Paulo, et in omni tractatu, ut alia discerentur ad scientiam, alia discerentur ad actus et ad vitam; ita et hic ad scientiam, ita positum ut idem sentiatis: deinde ad vitam, eamdem dilectionem exerceatis. Eamdem quid est? quam alter circa vos, eamdem vos circa alterum; neque divisam dilectionem, sed in Christo dilectionem. Ipsa est eadem dilectio. Deinde adjecit: unanimes unum scientes. Eadem repetisse mihi videtur verso ordine, quae supra sunt dicta. Namque unum est unanimes quod ad eamdem dilectionem: aliud est unum scientes, quod supra ut dixi, ut unum sentiatis omnes. Verum et amplius aliud in his duobus est, quod in superioribus. Namque aliud est idem sentiatis omnes, aliud unum scientes, in ipso quidem: quippe cum ad scientiam utrique pertineat. Verum illud superius idem sentire, ad hoc est, ut adhuc scientia nondum confirmata, par tamen videatur sciendi potestas, nondum confecta, jam perfecta scientia. Secundo igitur praecepto cum uno in sensu utrumque sit, fortius tamen positum; unum, inquit, scientes: jam praeceptio est ipsa, cum scientes dixit. At vero superius idem sentientes dixit, id est sensus eosdem intelligentiae habentes: illud ergo adhuc in actu est, hoc in perfectione videri potest. Idem sentientes et ad vitam pari modo, etiam in actu est, circa vitam eamdem dilectionem exerceatis. Porro autem in perfectione hoc est unanimes et utrumque de moribus et de vitae genere: unde tamen cum eadem videantur singula in singulis, posteriora potiora sunt. Deinde adjunxit: nihil per contentionem neque per gloriam inanem. Potuit enim, et idem sentiendi, et idem sciendi esse tamen contentio. Modus igitur subjunctis est, qui esse debeat, vel potius qui non esse: nihil, inquit, per contentionem. Multi enim contendendi vel necessitatem habent vel voluntatem. Utramque igitur contentionem tulit, ut necessitas non sit contendendi nec voluntas. Quippe cum utrumque vitiosum sit. Alii curiositate in ipsam contentionem irruunt: alii natura tales sunt, ut contentiosi sint: ideo adjectum, nihil per contentionem. Deinde rursus alii ad jactantiam hoc proferunt, ut contendant, et pares esse vi– deantur, aut potiores resistendi pertinacia et superiores aut gloriandi. Hoc ergo auferri vult, dicitque, neque per gloriam inanem. Etenim gloria inanis est placere velle sermonibus, placere ingenti calliditate, et contentione disserendi. Raro enim apud Christianum debet esse contentio, non in sermone jactantia. Huic ita posito posteriori praecepto ne quid per gloriam inanem facere videamur, necessario subjunctum, sed per humilitatem sensus. Sic enim inanis gloria poterit auferri, si humilitas sit in sensibus, id est intellectibus. Hos enim sensus posuit. Quaerendi modo, proferat quaecumque tractat, non auctoritate suscepta. Invicem vos ab alteris proecedi arbitrantes. Vere enim haec humilitas, si omnem alterum putas esse potiorem: hoc est enim invicem praecedi ut vos arbitremini; ne quisquam alterum non ita putet, ut non potiorem aestimet, et praecedere et esse meliorem. Quod si ita est, haec est humilitas sensus. Deinde subjungit: Non sua propria unusquisque vestrum perspiciat, sed aliorum. Ex hoc sensu nectitur id quod postea subjungitur. Interea referendum hoc ad superiora, tunc enim implebitis meum gaudium, si et hoc quoque faciatis ut unusquisque non tantum sua propria perspiciat, sed aliorum, et ita singuli de aliis atque aliorum curas habeant. Hoc enim nos putamus. Quod si de nobis tantum cogitemus, nobis prodesse poterimus, et de nostris tantum rebus agere, de spe, de liberatione nostra: sed hoc parum est. Tunc enim vere de nobis agimus, si et alios curemus, et aliis prodesse properemus. Cum enim omnes unum corpus simus, aliis si prospiciamus, nobis prospicimus; si de aliis cogitemus, de nobis magis cogitamus. Hinc subjungit, quantum sit istud quod monet, quod prae– cipuum, quod vehemens, cum dicit: Hoc idem nos in nostris sensibus habeamus, quod et in Christo Jesu. Quid istud est, Hoc sentite in vobis quod sentitis in Christo Jesu; ipse exponit et explicat. Etenim si hoc sentimus in Christo Jesu, quia ipse magis de aliis, id est de nobis curam gessit, non de se, neque de eo quod ipse posset aut poterat, aut potest, sed de nobis potius cogitavit. Hoc est quod supra dixit, sed aliorum singuli curam geramus: etenim Dominus noster Christus Salvator, utique cum Salvator esset, aliis salutem attulit: et quemadmodum non modo benignitate tantum usus, neque fulgens sua benevolentia sua luce vestit et texit, neque ad se benignitate infusa et majestate revocavit. Ut ergo magis beneficium ejus, et maximum nosse possemus, exinanivit, inquit, se atque omni exuit majestate, ut in carnem descendens, ut omnem illam patientiam humilitatis suscipiens, nobis ut prodesset carne, injurias in carne, deinde crucem mortemque sustinuit. Quae omnia docent et hortantur nos, ut similiter imitantes Dominum, non de aliis potius cogitemus quam de nobis ipsis, Hoc est enim vere de nobis agere, aliorum curam pro eorum salute suscipere. Hoc est ergo ut hoc sentiatis in vobis, quod et in Christo sentitis, illum profuisse aliis sentitis: ergo et in vobis hoc sentite, ut pro aliis cogitetis, et sollicitudinem pro aliis suscipiatis, ut aliis prodesse possitis.
“For think this in yourselves which is also in Christ Jesus.” As I said, this is the exhortation he is now carrying out with fuller precepts: “fulfill,” he says, “my joy,” in the things by which it can be brought about: and these precepts, as he always taught, contain what is to be done, and likewise what is not to be done. What is to be done he adds thus: “that you all think the same, all exercise the same love, being of one soul, knowing one thing.” He inserts what is not to be done: “nothing through contention nor through vain glory.” And he adds again what is to be done: “but through humility of mind each considering others to surpass him.” Likewise he adds what is not to be done: “let each not look to his own things.” Then what is to be done: “but each to those of others.” Then he adds thus what is of greatest force for exhortation, and a sure exhortation from the precepts, in which the conclusion of the precept is this: that each think of the refreshment of others. This, he says, you ought to do, resolve, and think in yourselves, which Christ did: that, thinking of others, he thought nothing of himself and his own glory; or that, as he will teach, he himself laid aside his power in order to help all others. So this is held in the exhortation, so that the joy of Paul himself may be fulfilled. Let us see, then, the individual precepts. First he says, “that you think the same”: the power, right, and working of all Christianity is not to disagree, but to have one and the same thing in mind. For if there is one God, if one his Son, if one Holy Spirit, if all these three are one, so we too ought to hold as one what we think, so that we all think the same. Then follows that we “exercise the same love.” This now pertains to moral discipline, that is, to life; that to knowledge. For since I have said that there are two kinds in Paul, and in every treatise—that some things are learned for knowledge, others for acts and for life—so here too, for knowledge, it is set down “that you think the same”; then for life, “exercise the same love.” What is “the same”? The same you show to another as another shows to you; not a divided love, but love in Christ. This is the same love. Then he added: “of one soul, knowing one thing.” He seems to me to have repeated in reverse order what was said above. For “of one soul” is one thing, pertaining to the same love; “knowing one thing” is another, pertaining, as I said above, to “that you all think the same.” But there is something more in these two than in the earlier ones. For “that you all think the same” is one thing, “knowing one thing” another, in the same subject indeed, since both pertain to knowledge. But that earlier “thinking the same” serves this, that while knowledge is not yet confirmed, yet the power of knowing may appear equal, not yet completed, and knowledge already perfected. So in the second precept, though both are in one sense, it is set down more strongly: “knowing,” he says, “one thing”: this is already the precept itself, when he said “knowing.” But above he said “thinking the same,” that is, having the same perceptions of understanding: so that is still in act, this can be seen in perfection. “Thinking the same” and, for life in like manner, still in act, regarding life, “exercise the same love.” But in perfection there is “of one soul,” and both concern morals and the manner of life: hence, though each seems the same as its counterpart, the later ones are stronger. Then he added: “nothing through contention nor through vain glory.” For even with thinking the same and knowing the same there could still be contention. So a measure is added of what ought to be, or rather what ought not to be: “nothing,” he says, “through contention.” For many have either a necessity or a will to contend. So he removed both kinds of contention, so that there is neither necessity nor will to contend, since both are faulty. Some rush into contention itself out of curiosity; others are by nature such as to be contentious: therefore it was added, “nothing through contention.” Then again others bring this forward for boasting, so that they contend and seem equal, or superior by persistence in resisting, and superior in glorying. This, then, he wants taken away, and says, “nor through vain glory.” For vain glory is to wish to please by words, to please by great cunning and by contention in debate. For contention ought rarely to be found in a Christian, and not boasting in speech. With this later precept so set down, that we may not seem to do anything through vain glory, there was necessarily added, “but through humility of mind.” For so vain glory can be taken away, if there is humility in the mind, that is, in the understandings. For he set down these “senses.” Let him bring forward whatever he treats by way of inquiry, not by assumed authority. “Each considering others to surpass him.” For this is truly humility, if you think every other better: for this is to consider yourselves surpassed by one another; so that no one thinks of another without esteeming him better, and as surpassing and being better. If this is so, this is humility of mind. Then he adds: “Let each of you look not to his own things, but to those of others.” From this thought is linked what is added afterward. Meanwhile this is to be referred to what precedes: for then you will fulfill my joy, if you do this too, that each looks not only to his own things but to those of others, and so each has care for others and the concerns of others. For this is what we think: that if we think only of ourselves, we can profit ourselves, and deal only with our own affairs, with our hope, our liberation: but this is too little. For we truly deal with ourselves then, if we also care for others and hasten to profit others. For since we are all one body, if we look out for others, we look out for ourselves; if we think of others, we think all the more of ourselves. Hence he adds how great is this which he admonishes, how exceptional, how forceful, when he says: Let us have this same in our minds which is also in Christ Jesus. What this is—“think this in yourselves which you think in Christ Jesus”—he himself sets out and explains. For if we think this in Christ Jesus, that he took care rather for others, that is, for us, not for himself, nor for what he himself could or was able or is able to do, but thought rather of us. This is what he said above: “but each of us should take care of the things of others”: for our Lord Christ the Savior, surely, since he was Savior, brought salvation to others: and how he did not use kindness only, nor, shining with his goodwill, clothe and cover with his light, nor call back to himself by infused kindness and majesty. So that we might know his benefit as greater and greatest, he emptied himself, he says, and stripped off all majesty, so that, descending into flesh and taking up all that patience of humility, in order to profit us in the flesh, he endured injuries in the flesh, then the cross and death. All of which teach and exhort us, imitating the Lord in like manner, to think rather of others than of ourselves. For this is truly to deal with ourselves: to take up the care of others for their salvation. This, then, is “that you think this in yourselves which you also think in Christ”: you perceive that he profited others: so think this in yourselves too, that you think for others, and take up concern for others, so that you may be able to profit others.
2.6PL 8:1207a–1209c
Qui cum in forma Dei constitutus esset, non rapinam arbitratus est, ut esset oequalis Deo; sed et semetipsum exinanivit, et servi sumpsit formam in similitudine hominum factus, et habitu inventus tanquam homo Humiliavit se ipsum, subditus factus usque ad mortem, mortem autem crucis. Duas res, id est duo praecepta, supra dederat, unum ut diligerent humilitatem, aliud non sua tantum curarent, sed et aliorum. Et ait: Hoc sapite in vobis, quod et in Christo Jesu, Quid igitur de duobus istis accipimus in Christo Jesu? utrum unum? et quod unum? an ambo potius? Namque unum de humilitate manifestum, quod semetipsum humiliavit Christus, et servi sumpsit personam. Potest tamen esse hic etiam secundum praeceptum: propter alios enim ita sustinuit, et de aliis potius quam de se cogitavit. Breviter autem hic expositum, quod Christus sit, et antequam in carne descenderet, et in qua sit virtute atque sub– stantia. Dictum est enim quod forma Dei Christus esset. Quid autem sit Dei forma? non figura, non vultus, sed imago et potentia. Plene de hoc et hic tetigi ad Ephesios, et plenius uberiusque in aliis tractavi libris, Deum esse in eo quod est ipsum principale esse; esse autem ipsum, est principale habere, vivere et intelligere. Sed intelligere atque vivere, forma quaedam est et imago ipsius existentiae. Cum igitur existentia Deus sit, ut multis probatur, atque id magis quod supra existentiam est; forma autem existentiae, moveri, intelligere, vivere; circumformatur enim et definitur quodammodo, id est in considerationem et cognoscentiam devocatur, quod sit illud esse, quod invisibile est et incomprehensibile, vivere intelligitur et intelligere. Ita esse, pater est. vivere autem et intelligere, quae ista ipsa in eo sunt, quod est esse, quasi forma. Christus ergo Dei forma est: vita est enim Christus, et cognoscentia et intellectus. Haec igitur forma et imago Dei. Quanta potentia, et quanta deitas, vel virtus sit, alibi expressum. Ergo nunc Paulus: non, inquit, Christus rapinam credidit, id est hoc sibi vindicavit, tantum habere voluit, ut forma Dei esset; sed etiam se ipsum exinanivit potentia, ut ad mundum et ad carnem descenderet, et formam hominis sumeret, id est parvi et humilis imaginem. Illud autem diligenter et acute attendendum puto. quod cum et ipse se missum a Deo dicat, et voluntatem patris implere, hoc Ita positum mysterium est, ut ipsius sit voluntatis, quod venerit, et quod formam vel imaginem servi sumpserit. Sic enim ait, qui cum in forma Dei constitutus esset, non rapinam arbitratus est, ut esset oequalis Deo; sed semetipsum exinanivit, et servi sumpsit formam. Sed cum ita jungamus semper, et hoc intellectus necessitate capiamus, et in eo quod est esse, intelligentiam inesse et vitam, ut et Deo, cui est potentia haec ut esse sit, et esse omnibus praebeat, sit tamen intelligens illud, ut vivens vel supra intelligentiam et supra vitam, et supra existentiam Christus, qui vita est, etiam progressa a Deo vita insit, et in eo quod vita ipsa existentia, et ipsa intelligentia aequalis Deo est: unde et in Filio Pater est, et in Patre est Filius. Sed haec, ut dixi, plenius alibi. Ergo et cum Pater voluit. Filius voluit: et cum Filius voluit, Pater voluit. Unde utrumque recte, et quod missus a Patre est, et quod hic positum ut ipse se exinaniverit. Intelligamus autem ipsum se exinanisse, non in eo esse quod potentiam suam alibi dimiserit, aut se privaverit; sed ad sordida quaeque se humiliarit, ad postrema officia descendens. Cum haec implevit, se et potentiam suam exinanivit. Nam carnem sumens et formam hominis et similitudinem, omnia quae hominis erant perpessus est, egit, implevit. Hoc est enim quod ait, in similitudine hominis factus, et habitu inventus tanquam homo. Non enim audiendi sunt illi qui phantasma dicunt fuisse, quia dictum hic est in similitudine hominis: sed ad Deum refertur, et λόγον ipsum formatum per carnis assumptionem in similitudine hominum. Etenim cum caro in terris diversas formas habeat, accepisse autem carnem Christum manifestum sit; sed in qua similitudine dictum, in similitudine hominum, id est caetera animalia non quo hic similitudo hominum in Christo fuerit, non ipse homo susceptus. Denique adjectum post similitudinem et habitum, ut ita se haberet tanquam homo. Sic adjunxit, inventus tanquam homo. Graecus quidem σχήμα dixit, latinus habitum nominavit. Ita cum duo posita sunt apud graecum, in similitudine et habitu; accipiamus igitur habitu figuram, et ut se homo habeat. Etenim omnis hominis qualitas his duobus exprimitur, similitudine et figura. Potuit enim in immenso similitudo hominis, ut in gigantibus, ut in vultibus et in membris, quae finguntur: ideo ergo adjecit: et fi– gura hominis, ut certus habitus et modus. praeter similitudinem hominis, videatur assumptus. Porro autem quod dixit inventus tanquam homo, non hic cum dubitatione dictum, tanquam homo quasi non homo fuerit, sed phantasia hominis; sed dictum, inventus tanquam homo, Haec scilicet media pronuntiatione, qua vere non homo fuit, sed Deus, et carne et figura accepta quasi homo. Quod autem dixit, servi formam sumpsit, quoniam ipse forma Dei fuit, Dei autem servus homo est, idcirco dictum, servi formam sumpsit. Ex qua re se humiliavit, et se exinanivit factus, inquit, ut subditus usque ad mortem scilicet crucis. Ecce in hoc ipso cum dixit, subditus factus, graece autem aperte et plene, cum dictum ύτπίχοος γςνόμινος, quod est, subauditor effectus, in quo ut dixit, in hoc ipso expressum, quod paulo ante diximus, quoniam a Patre missus est. Si enim subauditor, verum est illud et integre dictum, qui me huc misit et subditus factus; certe potest utrumque non solum per illam rationem accipi atque intelligi quia et in Christo Deus est, et est in Filio Pater, et in Patre Filius, sed quod etiam in multis locis simile reperimus, ut et mittentis sit auctoritas, et voluntas obtemperantis. Etenim ut apud poetas, si cum pater Mercurium mittens imperio suo misit; Mercurius autem patris cum pareret imperio, se ipsum composuit, et se exinanivit ut volaret et iter tenderet, si fas est divinis talia comparare; intelligi licet, et Patris imperio Dei omnipotentis missum Christum: et Christus Filius, eo ipso quod imperio obtemperabat, se exinanivit, ut hominis formam sumeret, et in carne veniret, et servi imaginem sustineret, se humilians et obauditor factus, obauditor autem usque ad mortem. Quam illam mortem? multa enim genera mortis sunt: nam primum esse in carne, mortis est: deinde accipere omnia peccata carnis, et ipsa mors est: ideo adjectum, usque ad mortem. Quam mortem? crucis, inquit. Etenim nos Salvator morte non liberavit, sed morte crucis liberavit: omne enim mysterium non in morte tantum, sed Christi, sed et in morte crucis: unde dixit Paulus, fidem se habere in Christum, et in Christum ipsum crucifixum.
“Who, though he was established in the form of God, did not consider it robbery to be equal with God; but emptied himself, and took the form of a slave, being made in the likeness of men, and found in bearing as a man, he humbled himself, being made subject even to death, and the death of the cross.” He had given two things above, that is, two precepts: one, that they love humility; the other, that they care not only for their own things but also for those of others. And he says, “Think this in yourselves which is also in Christ Jesus.” What, then, of these two do we take in Christ Jesus? One? And which one? Or rather both? For one, about humility, is plain: that Christ humbled himself and took the person of a slave. Yet the second precept can be here too: for he endured so for the sake of others, and thought of others rather than himself. And here it is briefly set out what Christ is, both before he came down in the flesh, and in what power and substance he is. For it is said that Christ was the form of God. And what is the form of God? Not a shape, not a face, but image and power. I touched on this fully here too, in Ephesians, and treated it more fully and richly in other books: that God is in that he is the principal being itself; and being itself is principally to have living and understanding. But understanding and living are a kind of form and image of existence itself. Since, then, God is existence, as is proved in many ways, and still more what is above existence; and the form of existence is to be moved, to understand, to live—for that being which is invisible and incomprehensible is formed around and defined in a certain way, that is, called into consideration and knowledge, when living and understanding are understood. So being is the Father; but living and understanding, which are these very things in that which is being, are as it were form. Christ, then, is the form of God: for Christ is life, and knowledge and understanding. This, then, is the form and image of God. How great the power, how great the deity or virtue, is expressed elsewhere. So now Paul: Christ, he says, did not think it robbery, that is, did not claim this for himself and wish to have only this, that he was the form of God; but also emptied himself in power, so as to descend to the world and to the flesh, and take the form of man, that is, the image of something small and lowly. But I think this must be attended to carefully and keenly: that although he himself says that he was sent by God and fulfills the Father’s will, this is set down as a mystery in such a way that it is of his own will that he came and took the form or image of a slave. For so he says: “who, though he was established in the form of God, did not consider it robbery to be equal with God; but emptied himself, and took the form of a slave.” But since we always join them so, and grasp this by the necessity of understanding, that in that which is being there are understanding and life, so that even in God—to whom belongs this power, that he is being and provides being to all—there is yet that understanding, as living, or above understanding and above life and above existence; and that Christ, who is life, a life that has also come forth from God, is within, and in that he is life itself, existence, and understanding itself, he is equal to God: hence the Father is in the Son and the Son is in the Father. But these things, as I said, are treated more fully elsewhere. So when the Father willed, the Son willed; and when the Son willed, the Father willed. Hence both are rightly said: that he was sent by the Father, and, as is set down here, that he emptied himself. And let us understand that he emptied himself not in this sense, that he left his power somewhere else or deprived himself of it; but that he humbled himself to every mean thing, descending to the lowest offices. When he fulfilled these things, he emptied himself and his power. For taking flesh and the form and likeness of man, he suffered, did, and fulfilled all things that were man’s. For this is what he says: “made in the likeness of man, and found in bearing as a man.” For those are not to be heard who say he was a phantom because it is said here “in the likeness of man”: rather it is referred to God, and to the Logos himself formed by the taking of flesh in the likeness of men. For since flesh on earth has various forms, and it is plain that Christ received flesh; it was said in what likeness: in the likeness of men, that is, not of the other animals; not that there was here only a likeness of men in Christ, not man himself taken up. Then it is added after likeness, also “bearing,” so that he bore himself as a man. So he added, “found as a man.” The Greek said schēma; the Latin named it habitus, “bearing.” So, since two things are set down in the Greek, likeness and bearing, let us take bearing as figure, and how a man bears himself. For the whole quality of a man is expressed by these two, likeness and figure. For there could be a likeness of man on an immense scale, as in giants, as in the faces and limbs that are fashioned; so therefore he added also the figure of man, so that a definite bearing and measure, besides the likeness of man, might be seen to have been taken up. And as to his saying “found as a man,” this was not said with doubt, “as a man,” as if he were not a man but a phantom of a man; but “found as a man” was said by this middle way of speaking, by which in truth he was not a man [only], but God, and, having received flesh and figure, as it were man. And as to his saying, “he took the form of a slave”: since he was himself the form of God, and man is God’s slave, therefore it was said, “he took the form of a slave.” From this he humbled himself and emptied himself, being made, he says, subject even to death, namely of the cross. See, in this very thing, when he said “being made subject”—and in the Greek it is said openly and fully, hypēkoos genomenos, that is, “made a hearer under”—in this very thing is expressed what we said a little before, that he was sent by the Father. For if he was a hearer under, that is truly and wholly said, “he who sent me here,” and “made subject”; surely both can be taken and understood not only by that reasoning, that God is also in Christ, and the Father is in the Son, and the Son in the Father, but also because in many places we find the like, that the authority belongs to the sender and the will to the one obeying. For as among the poets, when the father sent Mercury by his command, and Mercury, obeying the father’s command, composed himself and emptied himself to fly and take his journey—if it is lawful to compare such things with divine ones—one may understand both that Christ was sent by the command of God the almighty Father, and that Christ the Son, by the very fact that he obeyed the command, emptied himself, so as to take the form of man, and come in the flesh, and bear the image of a slave, humbling himself and becoming obedient, and obedient even to death. Which death? For there are many kinds of death: for first, to be in the flesh belongs to death; then to take on all the sins of the flesh is itself death; therefore it was added, “even to death.” Which death? “Of the cross,” he says. For the Savior did not free us by death, but freed us by the death of the cross: for the whole mystery lies not in death only, but Christ’s, and in the death of the cross: hence Paul said that he had faith in Christ, and in Christ himself crucified.
2.9PL 8:1209c–1211b
Quibus omnibus quid colligitur? Ergo Christus et aliis consuluit, et se humilem fecit. Propter quod et Deus exaltavit illum, et donavit illi nomen, ut in nomine Jesu omnes genua flectant, coe– lestium, terrestrium, et infernorum; et omnis lingua confiteatur quoniam Dominus Jesus Christus in gloria Dei Patris. Quid istud sit, quod nunc dictum est, quia ideo Deus Filium suum exaltavit, et ei donavit nomen quod supra omnia nomina est, et quod sit hoc ipsum nomen, et quare nunc haec donaverit atque concesserit, etsi magni tractatus est magnaeque doctrinae, tamen nos id quale sit, breviter admonemus. Christus, id est λόγος, qui cum Deo est, et apud Deum, Juxta Deum, et idcirco etiam ipse Deus, cui >070? hic ex operatione ejus provenit, ut et Christus esset Jesus, et exaltaretur, et supra omnia nomina nomen acciperet, λόγος, inquam, iste in eo quod λό- γος est, forma Dei est, vere jungitur, copulatur, unumque est, et idcirco et λόγος Deus est, per quem creata sunt omnia, et in quo quod effectum est, vita est, et hoc fuit a principio, et sine logo factum est nihil, qui jungitur. Simpliciter hoc aures accipiant, num ipso tempore Filius non dicebatur? Intelligi quidem potest, quoniam virtute Dei, ut Deus ipse, et forma Dei, ipse Deus, nomen hoc et hoc vocabulum postea acceperit, posteaquam in mundum descendens, id est ύλην, ipsam ύλην praecidit, et vicit, et mortem superavit, ut jam mors non dominaretur. Quod si tanta haec ejus opera, et tanta misericordia Dei, per hoc ab illo munus impletum est, in reditu atque reversione hoc nomen accepit, et hinc exaltatus est, et hanc gratiam consecutus est, ut Filii nomen acciperet, quod nomen supra omne nomen est. Sed catholica disciplina dicit, et semper fuisse Patrem, et semper Filium: et ita et dicendum est, et intelligendum. Verumtamen, quoniam apud nos hic error est natus, quod constet ante in carne descensum, nunquam filium dictum esse λόγον, nec nunc ita expositio ista currit, et sententiam suam tenet, ut cum dictum sit quod se ipsum exinaniverit, et cum Dei esset forma, formam servi acceperit et figuram, in similitudine inventus hominis et factus; et usque ad mortem se humiliaverit, et mortem crucis, et adjunctum ita sit, propter quod Deus illum exaltavit: videtur propter ipsam passionem exaltatus esse, et accepisse se hanc gratiam, ut hoc nomen acciperet quod supra omne nomen est, propter istam, inquam, causam. Sic enim dicit Paulus. Quod si ita est, quasi intelligi vult, ante hoc non fuisse nomen, ut fuerit virtus Dei, λόγος fuerit, etiam forma fuerit in eo quod λόγος, et Deus, et fuerit apud Deum: ac propterea quasi non conveniat, ut tunc filii nomen acceperit, sed posteaquam missus. In quo intelligimus jam, ex eo quod missus est, illum esse Patrem, et hunc Filium: deinde propter opera, propter mysterium, propter passionem, qua vita mors est, morte ipsa Christi; propter hanc, inquam, gratiam accepit nomen quod supra omne nomen est; ut tantum nomen accesserit, res eadem fuerit: et ante, id est λόγος, atque ipsa virtus; non ut nunc primum res fuerit, quando in carnem venit. Sed cum res venit, id est virtus, et sapientia, et actus, et operatio, λόγος tamen dictus fuerit, et λόγος fuerit. Nunc autem ipse λόγος cum induit carnem, ut dictum est, ipse, inquam, λόγος post passionem, et post mortem crucis, qua vicit omnem mortem et omnia peccata, vocabulum acceperit Filii, quod vocabulum supra omne nomen est. Quid enim est quod possit accipi aequale, quod comparari possit cum Filii nomine? Etenim amicitia, sanguinis conjunctio, germanitas, et caetera, inferiora sunt omnia; sive ministrorum, sive angelorum, sive quaecumque alia dixerimus. Est igitur Filius supra omne nomen: quod nomen dedit Deus Christo post passionem, post crucem. Videri tamen potest, prope non ita esse ut verum sit. quod Filius supra omne nomen sit. Etenim si filius non dicitur nisi cum pater sit, et pater cum fi– lius sit, numquid etiam hoc nomen, Filius, supra illud nomen est, quod Pater est? Utique non. Quomodo ergo Filius nomen cum acciperet, supra omne nomen accepit? Utique circa alia sine dubio nomina accipienda sunt, supraque omnia alia hoc nomen Fili sit. Nam pater cum Filio junctus est, et aequalia nomina ista sunt, quantum ad nomina; etsi non sit Filius nomen supra Patris nomen, nec Pater nomen supra Filii nomen. Virtus illa quae dicitur Pater, supra est, supra illam virtutem, quae dicitur Filius; nomen tamen vel Filius vel Pater, aequalia inter se sunt. Quod si ita est, Filius supra omne nomen est, quia Pater cum Filio simul supra omne nomen est; cui nomini, et in quo nomine, Jesu Christi, omnis homo genua curvat, et orat: neque homo tantum, sed omnia coelestia et omnia terrena, et omnia sub terris quae inferius esse dicuntur. Et item: Omnis vox confitetur quod Jesus Christus Dominus noster, in gloria Patris est, et fuit semper. Haec ergo gloria et data est, ut gloria sit ipse patris, quoniam et pater eum genuit; et ab eo creatus mundus est et salvatus, et vita mors est; et salus aeternitasque, quae quaesita est his omnibus. Qui in ipsum credunt mortem in Christi morte vicerunt.
What is gathered from all these? So Christ both took counsel for others and made himself lowly. “For which reason God also exalted him, and gave him a name, that in the name of Jesus all should bend the knee, of those in heaven, on earth, and below the earth; and every tongue confess that the Lord Jesus Christ is in the glory of God the Father.” What this is which has now been said—that God therefore exalted his Son and gave him the name that is above all names—and what this name itself is, and why he gave and granted these things now, although it is a matter of great treatment and great teaching, we nonetheless briefly point out what it is like. Christ, that is, the Logos, who is with God, and at God’s side, near God, and therefore is himself God, to whom … came here from his working, so that he was also Christ Jesus, and was exalted, and received a name above all names: this Logos, I say, in that he is Logos, is the form of God, is truly joined, coupled, and is one, and therefore the Logos too is God, through whom all things were created, and in whom what was made is life, and this was from the beginning, and without the Logos nothing was made, he who is joined. Let the ears take this simply: was he not called Son at that very time? It can indeed be understood that by the power of God, as God himself and the form of God, himself God, he received this name and this word afterward, after, descending into the world, that is, into hylē, he cut off hylē itself, and conquered, and overcame death, so that death no longer ruled. If such are these works of his, and such the mercy of God, and through this the task was fulfilled by him, at his return and going back he received this name, and from there he was exalted, and obtained this grace, that he received the name of Son, which name is above every name. But the catholic teaching says that the Father always was, and the Son always: and so it must be both said and understood. Yet since an error has arisen among us here, that it is agreed that before the descent into the flesh the Logos was never called Son, this exposition does not now run so, nor hold its view thus: but since it is said that he emptied himself, and though he was the form of God took the form and figure of a slave, was found and made in the likeness of man, and humbled himself even to death, and the death of the cross, and it is added thus, “for which reason God exalted him,” he seems to have been exalted because of the passion itself and to have received this grace, that he should receive this name which is above every name, for this, I say, cause. For so Paul says. If this is so, he seems to want it understood that before this the name did not exist: that he was the power of God, was the Logos, was even the form in that he was Logos, and God, and was with God; and therefore that it would not, as it were, be fitting that he received the name of Son then, but after he was sent. In which we now understand, from the fact that he was sent, that the one is Father and this one Son; then that because of the works, because of the mystery, because of the passion, by which death is life, by the very death of Christ—because of this grace, I say, he received the name which is above every name; so that only the name was added, while the reality was the same: also before, that is, the Logos and the power itself; not as though the reality first existed now, when he came into flesh. But when the reality came, that is, power, wisdom, act, and working, he was nonetheless called Logos and was Logos. But now the Logos himself, when he put on flesh, as was said, the Logos himself, I say, after the passion and after the death of the cross, by which he conquered all death and all sins, received the word “Son,” which word is above every name. For what can be taken as equal, what can be compared with the name of Son? For friendship, kinship of blood, brotherhood, and the rest are all lower; whether of ministers, or of angels, or whatever else we may name. The Son, then, is above every name: which name God gave to Christ after the passion, after the cross. Yet it may seem almost not to be so, that it is true that the Son is above every name. For if one is not called son unless there is a father, and father unless there is a son, is this name “Son” also above that name which is “Father”? Surely not. How, then, when he received the name of Son, did he receive it above every name? Surely it must be taken without doubt with regard to the other names, and this name of Son is above all others. For the Father is joined with the Son, and these names are equal, as far as names go; although the name Son is not above the name of the Father, nor the name Father above the name of the Son. That power which is called Father is above, above that power which is called Son; yet the names Son and Father are equal to each other. If this is so, the Son is above every name, because the Father together with the Son is above every name; to which name, and in which name, of Jesus Christ, every man bends the knee and prays: and not man only, but all heavenly things, and all earthly, and all under the earth, which are said to be below. And likewise: “Every voice confesses that Jesus Christ our Lord is in the glory of the Father,” and always was. This glory, then, was also given, so that he is himself the glory of the Father, since the Father both begot him; and by him the world was created and saved, and death is life; and salvation and eternity, which were sought by all these. Those who believe in him have conquered death in the death of Christ.
2.12PL 8:1211b–1212b
Quapropter, mihi charissimi, quem– admodum semper obauditis, non tanquam in proesentiam tantum, sed multo magis nunc in absentia, cum metu et tremore salutem vestram operamini. Deus est enim qui operatur in vobis, et voluntate et efficacia, pro bona voluntate, Post mysterium totius administrationis editum, quod ista positum fuerat, uti praeceptum confirmaretur, quo monebat ut omnis homo non de se cogitaret, neque curam gereret, ut et Dominus noster Jesus suo mysterio egit; subjungitur, ut dixi, exhortatio ut se invicem diligant, primo cum dixit illos charissimos sibi et dilectissimos: deinde sicuti, inquit, mihi obaudientes fuistis, ita semper obaudistis, non in praesentia tantum, sed magis ac magis in absentia, et obaudistis cum timore et tremore. Quare autem magis ac magis? vel quia dies praecedunt, vel quia in absentia plus timendus est ille, qui monet. Quid autem istud quod hortatur et monet ut agant atque operentur salutem suam, et agant observantes atque obedientes, cum timore, inquit, et tremore? ut timor ad animum, tremor vero ad corpus referatur. Magnum autem mysterium quod intente audire debemus, quod consulentes et curam aliis gerentes, nobis magis salutem operamur. Deinde quod in nobis praestans sit nobis salutem operari. Sic enim dixit, salutem vestram operamini. Sed rursus ne unusquisque parum gratiam Deo referat, si ipse sibi salutem operari videatur, adjectum est illud, Deus est enim qui operatur in vobis, et voluntate et efficacia, pro bona voluntate. Ergo salutem vestram, inquit, operamini: sed ipsa operatio tamen a Deo est: Deus enim operatur in vobis, et operatur ut velitis ita. Et velle quasi nostrum est, unde nos operamur nobis salutem. Et tamen quia ipsum velle, a Deo nobis operatur, fit ut ex Deo et operationem et voluntatem habeamus. Ita utrumque mixtum est, ut et nos habeamus voluntatem, et Dei sit ipsa voluntas; et quia habemus voluntatem, adsit efficacia pro bona voluntate. Magis autem hominis alligat timorem, cum dicit, Deus est enim qui operatur in vobis. Etenim si in ipsis Deus est qui operatur, sine dubio in timore esse debemus, ne faciamus contra Dei voluntatem, aut minus agendo, aut non cum timore et tremore. Operatur autem Deus in nobis, et velle et agere, pro bona voluntate. Ita qui non ex Deo operatur, primum non habet velle: deinde etiam si habuerit velle, efficaciam non habet, quia non habet bonam voluntatem.
“So, my dearest, as you have always obeyed, not only as in my presence, but much more now in my absence, work out your salvation with fear and trembling. For it is God who works in you, both in will and in effect, for his good will.” After the mystery of the whole dispensation was set out—which had been set down there to confirm the precept by which he warned that no man should think of or care for himself, as our Lord Jesus too acted by his mystery—there is added, as I said, an exhortation that they love one another; first when he called them his dearest and most beloved; then, as, he says, you have been obedient to me, so you have always obeyed, not in my presence only, but more and more in my absence, and obeyed with fear and trembling. Why more and more? Either because days go on, or because in absence the one who admonishes is more to be feared. And what is this, that he exhorts and admonishes them to do and work out their salvation, and to do it observing and obeying, “with fear,” he says, “and trembling”? So that fear is referred to the mind, but trembling to the body. And it is a great mystery which we ought to hear attentively: that by taking counsel and care for others we work out salvation the more for ourselves. Then, that it is in our power to work out salvation for ourselves. For so he said, “work out your salvation.” But again, so that each one would not give too little thanks to God if he seemed to work out salvation for himself, it is added: “for it is God who works in you, both in will and in effect, for his good will.” So work out, he says, your salvation: but the working itself is from God: for God works in you, and works so that you will so. And willing is as it were ours, from which we work out salvation for ourselves. And yet because the very willing is worked in us by God, it comes about that we have both the working and the will from God. So both are mixed: that we have the will, and the will itself is God’s; and because we have the will, effect is present for the good will. And he binds a man’s fear more strongly when he says, “for it is God who works in you.” For if it is God who works in them, without doubt we ought to be in fear, lest we act against God’s will, either by doing less or not with fear and trembling. And God works in us both to will and to act, for his good will. So one who does not work from God first does not have the willing; then, even if he has the willing, he does not have the effect, because he does not have the good will.
2.14PL 8:1212b–1213b
Omnia facite sine murmurationibus et hoesitationibus vel retractationibus. Ista duo sunt monita, ut cum agimus aliquid jam fidentes, Jam in Deum credentes, et mandata divina exequimur vel apostolica vel prophetica vel evangelica, non habeamus murmurationem, id est querelas obtemperandi cum obtemperamus: ne quid, inquit, agamus vel cum dubitatione aliqua vel cum ratiocinatione ac retractatione, faciendum enim vel non esse faciendam. Vel quia ex necessitate facias, si conqueraris, non est obtemperantis bona voluntas. Ut sitis sine querela (Graecus ait, ut sitis sine culpatione): id est, ut querela de vobis non sit: et hoc dixerit latinus, sine querela et Inculpabiles. Denique hoc sequitur: Et sinceri filii Dei immaculati, in medio pravoe generationis et perversa. Si enim hoc modo vivatis et hoc modo obediatis, non eritis maculati, inquit latinus. Graecus tamen ita posuit τέχνα, id est filii sine vituperatione. Hoc est, et supra dictum, sinceri autem sitis nunc, ubi in medio prava generationis et perversae. Quid hoc significet? si salvata anima hoc modo filius Dei fit, si ita vivat quemadmodum nunc, cum in mundo est, in medio est, in prava generatione et perversa, id est in hac vita. Ergo cum in hac vita sumus, laborandum nobis est, ut perversitatem istam fugientes et pravitatem generationis istius id est creaturae, in qua sumus, immaculati sine vituperatione, sinceri Dei filii, vivamus; facientes omnia sine vituperatione et sine retractatione. Non ergo facere tantum sufficit, sed et hoc modo facere, ut nulla sit apud nos vel retractatio vel admurmuratio et querela faciendi. Quae si in vita ista faciamus, mens enim devota jam Deo tunc efficitur inter filios Dei, si faciat praecepta Dei volens, cupida, sine querela; et faciat nunc cum in medio sit pravae generationis atque perversae. In quibus lucetis ita ut luminaria in mundo. Magna exhortatio, cum jam in hoc ipso, in quo in hoc mundo sumus, emineamus jam in hac prava generatione et perversa: emineamus autem ita, ut mundi luminaria simus, quae in ipso mundo; ut sol atque luna et ut caeterae stellae lucentes. Fide enim et cognitione Dei secundum divina praecepta viventes excellunt Christiani, et ut lux et splendor in hoc mundo existunt. Etenim si praeter caeteros homines omnia, quaeque mala sunt, vincunt, et occultos daemones opprimunt, et iniquitates produnt, vincentes tenebras et opera tenebrarum; agunt in hoc mundo ut luminaria, et lumen omnibus praestant.
“Do all things without murmurings and hesitations or second thoughts.” These are two admonitions: that when we now do something, trusting, now believing in God, and carry out the divine commands, whether apostolic or prophetic or evangelical, we should not have murmuring, that is, complaints about obeying while we obey; that we should not do anything, he says, either with some doubt or with reasoning and second thoughts as to whether it should be done or not. Or because, if you complain, you act from necessity, which is not the good will of one who obeys. “That you may be without complaint” (the Greek says, “that you may be without blame”): that is, that there be no complaint about you: and the Latin may have said this, “without complaint and blameless.” Then this follows: “And sincere sons of God, without blemish, in the midst of a crooked and perverse generation.” For if you live in this way and obey in this way, you will not be blemished, says the Latin. But the Greek put it thus: tekna, that is, sons without reproach. This is also what was said above, “but be sincere now,” in the midst of a crooked and perverse generation. What does this signify? If the saved soul becomes a son of God in this way, if it lives as now, when it is in the world, it is in the midst, in a crooked and perverse generation, that is, in this life. So while we are in this life, we must labor so that, fleeing this perversity and the crookedness of this generation, that is, of the creation in which we are, we may live without blemish, without reproach, sincere sons of God, doing all things without reproach and without second thoughts. So it is not enough only to do, but to do in such a way that there is in us no second thought, or murmuring and complaint about doing. If we do these things in this life—for the mind already devoted to God is then made one among the sons of God, if it does God’s precepts willingly, eagerly, without complaint; and does them now, while it is in the midst of a crooked and perverse generation. “Among whom you shine as lights in the world.” A great exhortation: that already in this very state in which we are in this world, we may stand out already in this crooked and perverse generation: and stand out so as to be lights of the world, which are in the world itself; like the sun and moon and the other shining stars. For living by faith and the knowledge of God according to the divine precepts, Christians excel, and exist as light and splendor in this world. For if, beyond other men, they conquer all things that are evil, and overpower the hidden demons, and expose iniquities, conquering darkness and the works of darkness, they act in this world as lights, and give light to all.
2.16PL 8:1213b–1213c
Verbum vitoe obtinentes ad gloriam mihi in die Christi. Et vobis praemium est, quod ita vivitis, si quidem luminaria in mundo estis; et mihi ad gloriam eritis in die Christi, id est cum judicaturus venerit Christus. Ego per vos habeo gloriam, quia vitae verbum obtinetis, id est quia Christum cognovistis, quod est verbum vitae: quia in Christo quod factum est, vita est. Ergo Christus verbum vitae est. Unde cognoscitur quantum sit beneficium et quanta gloria eorum, qui animas aliorum corrigunt. Quoniam non in vacuum cucurri. Haec erit mihi, inquit, gloria per diem Christi, quod vos liberavi, et labor meus non in vacuum laboravit neque in vacuum cucurrit. Labor genus est, species laboris est curre– re. Ergo cum genus proposuisset, non in vacuum laboravi, quod esse poterat vel corpore vel lingua vel monitione vel instantia; adjecit speciem certam, non in vacuum cucurri. Hic vel labor est itineris, vel labor affectus, ut hoc persuaderet, et cito persuaderet: hoc est non in vacuum cucurri.
“Holding fast the word of life, for my glory in the day of Christ.” And there is a reward for you, that you live so, since you are lights in the world; and for me you will be a glory in the day of Christ, that is, when Christ comes to judge. I have glory through you, because you hold fast the word of life, that is, because you have known Christ, who is the word of life: because what was made in Christ is life. So Christ is the word of life. From this it is known how great the benefit and how great the glory of those who correct the souls of others. “Since I have not run in vain.” This will be my glory, he says, through the day of Christ: that I freed you, and my labor did not labor in vain, nor run in vain. Labor is the genus; running is a species of labor. So having put forward the genus, “I have not labored in vain,” which could be with body or tongue or admonition or persistence, he added a definite species, “I have not run in vain.” This is either the labor of travel or the labor of affection, to persuade them of this, and persuade them quickly: this is “I have not run in vain.”
2.17PL 8:1213c–1213d
Sed si laboro in victima et obsequio fidei vestroe, loetor et gratulor omnibus vobis. Hoc idem et vos loetamini mihi. Quod supra per praeceptum datum est, hic in exhortatione ponitur: uti non nostri tantum curam habeamus, sed etiam unusquisque et aliorum. Quod si ita est, et gratulatio et ex nobis nascitur. De nobis et de aliis hoc ait. Sed si laboro, inquit, in victima et obsequio fidei vestrae, hoc est ut pro vobis etiam mori paratus sim, dummodo obsequar vobis, et fidem vestram confirmem, laetor et gratulor omnibus vobis. Sic ergo et vos laetamini mihi, ut pariter et curam nostri omnes geramus, et de nobis invicem laetemur.
“But if I labor in the sacrifice and service of your faith, I am glad and rejoice with you all. In the same way you too be glad with me.” What was given above by precept is set here in exhortation: that we should have care not for ourselves only, but each also for others. If this is so, rejoicing too arises from us. He says this of us and of others. But if I labor, he says, in the sacrifice and service of your faith, that is, so that I am ready even to die for you, provided I serve you and confirm your faith, I am glad and rejoice with you all. So in this way you too be glad with me, so that we all equally take care of one another and rejoice in one another.
2.19PL 8:1213d–1214b
Spero autem in Domino Jesu Christo Timotheum celeriter mittere Vobis, ut et ego bono animo possim esse, cognoscens quoe penes vos sunt. Hoc autem de mandatis est. Vere autem curam illorum gerit, siquidem et mittere alterum, qui eadem praestet illis, pollicetur, et a(??) quo cognoscat quae agant Philippenses. Timotheum suum carissimum promittit brevi se esse missurum. Et quoniam omnis actus noster Deo est assignandus, ut a Deo compleatur, spero, inquit, in Domino Jesu Christo, quod vobis mittam Timotheum, et celeriter mittam. Causa cur mittat subjungitur: ut et ego bono animo sim, cognoscens quae vos agatis, aut quemadmodum circa vos res sit. Quod autem dixit, ut et ego bono animo possim esse; spero enim vos bono esse animo, quod omnia praecepta servatis, et fidem in Jesu Christo, unde bono animo estis; ideo autem ego mittere Timotheum celeriter volo, ut et ego bono animo possim esse, cum cognosco quae sunt penes vos, vel ex moribus ves– tris, vel ex aliorum.
“But I hope in the Lord Jesus Christ to send Timothy to you quickly, so that I too may be of good spirit, knowing what concerns you.” This is among the commands. He truly cares for them, since he promises to send another who will provide them the same things, and from whom he may learn what the Philippians are doing. He promises that he will shortly send his dearest Timothy. And since every act of ours must be assigned to God, to be completed by God, “I hope,” he says, “in the Lord Jesus Christ” that I will send Timothy to you, and send him quickly. The reason why he sends him is added: “so that I too may be of good spirit, knowing” what you are doing, or how matters stand with you. And as to his saying, “so that I too may be of good spirit”: for I hope that you are of good spirit, because you keep all the precepts and the faith in Jesus Christ, from which you are of good spirit; but I wish to send Timothy quickly so that I too may be of good spirit, when I know what concerns you, either from your conduct or from that of others.
2.20PL 8:1214b–1214c
Neminem enim habeo, qui mecum sit unanimis. Quare Timotheum polliceatur ostendit, et dat causas, quia neminem unanimem habet, id est, qui eamdem mentem gerat. Habes unam causam. Subjunxit alteram: qui fideliter sollicitus est de vobis. Vere iste mittendus, qui et mihi sit charissimus, et vestri curam gerat, et sollicitudinem pro vobis habeat: Omnes enim sua quoerunt, non quoe sunt Jesu Christi. Quoniam dixit, solus est, et neminem inquit habeo, qui mihi sit unanimis. De caeteris quas causas ponit? Scilicet quae secunda est pietas. Nam si Timotheus datur, qui fideliter sollicitus sit pro vobis; et hanc causam subjunxit, vitium atque peccatum, omnes sua quoerunt, id est solliciti sunt, sua defendunt, sua custodiunt(??) et ad hoc Christiani non est. Quid enim est Christiani quaerere potius In quocumque socio fratre, quam quae Christi sunt id est fidem in Christum, societatem, amorem, scientiam? Potest tamen illud intelligi, quoe sunt, id est de Christo evangelizare.
“For I have no one who is of one mind with me.” He shows why he promises Timothy, and gives reasons: because he has no one of one mind, that is, who bears the same mind. You have one reason. He added another: “who is faithfully concerned for you.” Truly this one must be sent, who is both dearest to me, and takes care of you, and has concern for you. “For all seek their own things, not those of Jesus Christ.” Since he said that he is alone, and “I have no one,” he says, “who is of one mind with me.” What reasons does he give about the rest? Namely the second, which is piety. For if Timothy is given as one who is faithfully concerned for you, he has also added this reason, the vice and sin: “all seek their own things,” that is, are concerned, defend their own, guard their own; and this is not of a Christian. For what is it for a Christian to seek in any companion or brother rather than the things of Christ, that is, faith in Christ, fellowship, love, knowledge? Yet “the things that are” may also be understood as preaching the gospel about Christ.
2.22PL 8:1214c–1215a
Sed experimentum ejus optime scitis. Id est probationem de eo habetis: graecus ita posuit. Scire debetis, percipite atque cognoscite qualem probationem ejus habeam. Denique juste connectitur, quod sequitur, quoniam sicuti patri filius mecum servivit in Evangelio. Apparet ergo quid sit, non quoe sunt Jesu Christi quoerunt. Servivit, inquit, mecum Timotheus in Evangelio sicuti patri filius. Breviter quemadmodum servierit ostendit, quanquam dixerit mecum servivit in Evangelio. Sed quomodo servivit? ut servit filius patri, in charitate et obsequio majore servivit mecum Timotheus in Evangelio: mecum enim, inquit, servivit: non mihi servivit. Hunc igitur spero me mittere mox. Posteaquam commendavit personam et affectum et diligentiam, subjunxit quod talem virum missurus sit. Spero, inquit, me mittere. Hoc et supra, spero in Domino. Quod autem dixit mox, hoc est quod supra celeriter. Ut videro quae circa me sint, mittam Timotheum; sed cum videro quae circa me sint. Confido autem in Domino quod et ipse cito veniam. Magno affectu et magna monitione hoc adjunxit, quod cum mittat Timotheum, tamen se promittat esse venturum.
“But you know very well his proof.” That is, you have proof of him: the Greek put it so. You ought to know; perceive and recognize what proof I have of him. Then what follows is rightly joined: “since as a son with a father he has served with me in the gospel.” It appears, then, what it is to “seek not the things of Jesus Christ.” Timothy, he says, has served with me in the gospel as a son with a father. He shows briefly how he served, although he said, “he served with me in the gospel.” But how did he serve? As a son serves a father: in love and greater obedience Timothy served with me in the gospel: for he served with me, he says, not me. “Him, then, I hope to send soon.” After he commended the person, his affection, and his diligence, he added that he will send such a man. I hope, he says, to send him. This is also above: “I hope in the Lord.” And as to his saying “soon,” this is what was “quickly” above. “As soon as I see how things stand with me,” I will send Timothy; but when I see how things stand with me. “And I trust in the Lord that I myself also shall come soon.” With great affection and great admonition he added this: that while he sends Timothy, he yet promises that he himself will come.
2.25PL 8:1215a–1215c
Confido enim, inquit, in Domino, quia circa me omnia recte erunt; Necessarium tamen existimavi Epaphroditum fratrem, et commilitonem meum, vestrum autem apostolum, et ministrum desiderii mei, mittere ad vos. Licet promiserit Timotheum celeriter se missurum, tamen quia habet adhuc quamdam moram, cum missurum se dixit, nunc mittit Epaphroditum: necessarium, inquit, mittere ad vos Epaphroditum. Commendat personam: postea subjunxit causam. Commendatio personae est, fratrem in lege, commilitonem castris et in labore Evangelii, vestrum autem apostolum. Ecce Epaphroditum apostolum nominat. Omnis enim qui mittitur, et qui propter Evangelium mittitur, apostolus dici potest. Denique hinc illi apostoli dicti xii vel xi a ministerio, quo mittebantur praedicare. Ita quicumque ad hoc mittitur, apostolus dici potest. Quod autem dixit vestrum apostolum, vel quia ad vos mittitur; alii enim ad alia loca: vel quem vos de vestris elegistis apostolum; ministrum, inquit, tamen desiderii mei. Quod est autem desiderium meum? ut vos audiatis, ut vos verbum obtineatis.
For I trust, he says, in the Lord that all will be well with me. “Yet I thought it necessary to send to you Epaphroditus, my brother and fellow soldier, but your apostle, and the minister of my desire.” Although he promised to send Timothy quickly, yet because there is still some delay, when he said he would send him, he now sends Epaphroditus: it is necessary, he says, to send Epaphroditus to you. He commends the person; afterward he added the reason. The commendation of the person is: a brother in the law, a fellow soldier in camp and in the labor of the gospel, “but your apostle.” See, he names Epaphroditus an apostle. For everyone who is sent, and who is sent for the sake of the gospel, can be called an apostle. So hence those twelve, or eleven, were called apostles from the ministry for which they were sent to preach. So whoever is sent for this can be called an apostle. And as to his saying “your apostle”: either because he is sent to you, for others are sent to other places; or one whom you chose from among your own as apostle; “minister,” he says, however, “of my desire.” And what is my desire? That you hear, that you hold fast the word.
2.26PL 8:1215c–1215d
Quia desiderans et concupiscens erat omnium vestrum. Nunc subjungit causam, quare ipsum mittat: etenim Timotheum celeriter se missurum dixit, ut bono animo possit esse cognoscens, quae penes vos sunt. Nunc hunc mittit, quia desiderat vos, et concupiscit vos omnes, et aegre est se esse absentem. Probat autem quod aegre ferat sic: et toediabatur propter quod audiebatis esse infirmum. Hoc, inquit, taedio laborabat, et audiebatis illum infirmum esse corpore, id est aegrotare. An hoc significat taediabatur, ut sibi sua causa sit, quod in aegrotatione fuit? et ex ipsa causa taediabatur, et propterea fuit, quia desideravit vos et concupivit? Inde ergo jam mitto illum vobis.
“Since he was longing for and desiring all of you.” Now he adds the reason why he sends him: for he said he would send Timothy quickly so that he might be of good spirit, knowing what concerns you. Now he sends this one because he longs for you and desires you all, and is distressed to be absent. And he proves that he is distressed thus: “and he was distressed because you had heard that he was ill.” With this distress, he says, he labored, and you had heard that he was ill in body, that is, sick. Or does “he was distressed” mean that it was for his own reason, that he was in sickness? And from that very reason he was distressed, and therefore it was, because he longed for you and desired you? From there, then, I now send him to you.
2.27PL 8:1215d–1216b
Nam et infirmus fuit usque ad mortem: sed Dominus misertus est ejus; nec illius tantum, sed etiam mei, ut non tristitiam habeam. Ostendit cur vel desiderabat Philippenses vel taediabatur; qui usque ad mortem, inquit, fuit infirmus. In tali aegrotatione magna sunt desideria et vehementia: ad mortem, inquit, aegrotabat; Dominus autem misertus est ejus. Ecce quoniam beneficium a Domino et hic in vita sentimus. Deinde quia et festinare ad mortem debemus· Licet enim peccati ministerium mundus sit, et idcirco fugiendus; tamen et desiderare vitam in mundo, peccatum non est. Et si debet desiderari, recte dictum, sed Dominus misertus est ejus. Deinde quoniam omne quod ad vitam hic agimus, si et justi simus, et nobis protinus et aliis, merito nostri miseretur Deus, et reservat in vita. Sic denique adjungit: Non illius tantum Deus misertus est, sed etiam mei, ut non tristitiam habeam. Etenim si supra dictum ministrum desiderii mei, de ipso Epaphrodito; si enim perderem ministrum desiderii mei, contristarer et tristitiam haberem. Ergo multi servantur: et Deus eorum miseretur, per quos aliquid agitur quod ad ministerium salvationis pertineat. Simul et nos pro hujusmodi hominibus rogare debemus, ne tristitiam habeamus si illos amiserimus, quorum auxilio utimur in divinis rebus agendis, insinuandis, enuntiandis.
“For he was indeed ill to the point of death: but the Lord had mercy on him; and not only on him, but also on me, so that I might not have sorrow.” He shows why he either longed for the Philippians or was distressed: he was ill, he says, to the point of death. In such sickness the longings are great and vehement: he was sick to death, he says; but the Lord had mercy on him. See, since we experience benefit from the Lord here in life too. Then, because we ought also to hasten to death [?]. For although the world is the ministry of sin, and therefore to be fled, yet to desire life in the world is not sin. And if it ought to be desired, it is rightly said, “but the Lord had mercy on him.” Then, since all that we do here for life, if we are also righteous, profits both us and others, God rightly has mercy on us and keeps us in life. So then he adds: God had mercy not on him only, but also on me, so that I might not have sorrow. For it was said above, “minister of my desire,” of this same Epaphroditus; for if I lost the minister of my desire, I would be saddened and have sorrow. So many are preserved: and God has mercy on those through whom something is done that pertains to the ministry of salvation. At the same time we too ought to pray for such people, so that we may not have sorrow if we lose those whose help we use in doing, instilling, and proclaiming divine things.
2.28PL 8:1216b–1216c
Festinantius itaque misi eum. Discrevit missiones suas. Nam de Epaphrodito, misi inquit. De Timotheo, celeriter, inquit, spero me mittere vobis. Et tamen supra, necessarium existimavi mittere ad vos, non de eo est, quod missurus est, sed quod jam missus. Unde hic conclusit, misi ad vos, ut cum videritis illum, denuo gratulemini, et ego sine tristitia sim. Junxit et hanc causam, cur illum miserit. Supra ideo: Misi, quia desiderabat vos et concupiscebat: nunc ad ipsos Philippenses, ut vos gaudeatis, et denuo gratulemini, cum illum videritis. Quid est denuo gratulemini? ut cum in tristitia fueritis; sic enim supra dictum, audieratis illum esse infirmum, nunc rursus gaudeatis, cum eum videtis. An denuo, quia post gravem valetudinem audierunt illum sanum factum, et gratulati sunt, nunc autem si eum videant, denuo gratulabuntur? Quod autem adjunxit, et ego sine tristitia sim, quia si supra dixit ministrum sui desiderii esse Epaphroditum, utique cum illum mittit, quasi videri potest tristis: sed quoniam et ille desiderabat illos, et gratulabuntur si illum viderint, poterit Paulus esse sine tristitia.
“So I have sent him the more speedily.” He has distinguished his sendings. For of Epaphroditus he says, “I sent.” Of Timothy, he says, “I hope to send to you quickly.” And yet above, “I thought it necessary to send to you,” is not about one he is going to send, but one already sent. Hence he concluded here: “I have sent him to you, so that when you see him you may rejoice again, and I may be without sorrow.” He joined this reason too, why he sent him. Above, therefore: “I sent,” because he longed for you and desired you: now to the Philippians themselves, “so that you may be glad,” and rejoice again, when you see him. What is “rejoice again”? So that, though you were in sorrow—for so it was said above, “you had heard that he was ill”—now again you may be glad when you see him. Or “again,” because after a grave illness they heard that he had been made well, and rejoiced, and now, if they see him, they will rejoice again? And as to his adding, “and I may be without sorrow”: since above he said that Epaphroditus was the minister of his desire, surely when he sends him he could seem sad: but since he too longed for them, and they will rejoice if they see him, Paul can be without sorrow.
2.29PL 8:1216d–1217b
Excipite ergo illum in Domino cum omni gratulatione; et eos qui hujusmodi sunt, in honoribus habetote. Quoniam propter opus Christi usque ad mortem accessit, exponens in incertum animam suam, ut suppleret id quod defuit vobis circa meum obsequium. Commendatio est haec, ut Epaphroditum suscipiant. Dat autem gratiam causamque commendationi; in Domino, inquit, excipite; id est ut eum, qui minister sit Domini: vos qui jam in Domino estis, amate Domini ministrum, et amate cum omni gratulatione. Atque id vult generaliter omnibus exhiberi, qui tales sunt. Eos, inquit, excipite qui ejusmodi sunt. Quid est autem, ipsum excipite? in honoribus habete. Dat etiam causas, cur ista praeberi hominibus velit, quoniam propter opus Christi usque ad mortem accessit. Hoc utique de Epaphrodito; quia dum vult labore et animi et corporis satisfacere Evangelio, hoc est verbum Domini praedicare, multum laboravit, et agrotatione gravi ad mortem accessit. Simul et quid Epaphrodito contigerit, et quid nos agere debeamus ostendit. At quantum labo– ravit? ad mortem, inquit, accessit; et ponens in incertum animam suam. Non in incertum quod circa vos agebat, sed in incertum quod usque periculum laboravit: ut jam in incerto esset, an viveret per laborem. Quid autem egit circa vos? Ut suppleret id quod defuit vobis circa meum obsequium: ut quod ego occupatus fui, ille compleret quod meum defuit obsequium. Etenim revera quoniam una praedicatio est, et una doctrina est, labor tantum diversus potest esse in singulis apostolis et evangelistis; unum tamen est, quod docent. Denique et ipse Epaphroditus apostolus quid implevit? Hoc, inquit, obsequium, quod vobis defuit, ille complevit.
“Receive him, then, in the Lord with all rejoicing; and hold such men in honor. For because of the work of Christ he came near to death, risking his life, so as to supply what was lacking in your service to me.” This is a commendation, that they should receive Epaphroditus. He gives grace and a reason to the commendation: “in the Lord,” he says, “receive him”; that is, him who is a minister of the Lord: you who are already in the Lord, love the Lord’s minister, and love him with all rejoicing. And he wishes this to be shown generally to all who are such. Those, he says, receive who are of this kind. And what is “receive him”? “Hold him in honor.” He also gives the reasons why he wants these things shown to such people: “since because of the work of Christ he came near to death.” This is surely of Epaphroditus; because, while he wishes to satisfy the gospel with labor of mind and body, that is, to preach the word of the Lord, he labored much, and by a grave sickness came near to death. At the same time he shows both what happened to Epaphroditus and what we ought to do. And how much did he labor? He came near to death, he says, “and risking his life.” Not uncertain about what he was doing for you, but uncertain in that he labored even to danger, so that he was now uncertain whether he would live, because of his labor. And what did he do for you? “So as to supply what was lacking in your service to me”: so that, since I was occupied, he completed what was lacking of my service. For in truth, since the preaching is one, and the teaching is one, only the labor can differ in individual apostles and evangelists; yet what they teach is one. Then what did Epaphroditus the apostle himself fulfill? This service, he says, which was lacking to you, he completed.
Chapter 3
3.1PL 8:1217b–1218b
De coetero, fratres, gratulamini in Domino: eadem scribere ad vos, mihi quidem non pigrum, vobis autem manifestum. Gaudete, inquit, in Domino, o fratres, quod mihi non pigrum est eadem ad vos non scribere, vobis autem plurimum prodest. Firmum atque tutum est, quod scribo. Graecus sic posuit, ut firmum diceret et tutum; latinus, manifestum ait. Cavete a canibus, attendite operarios malos, intuemini proecisionem. Nam circumcisio nos sumus, qui per spiritum Deo servimus, et exultamus in Christo Jesu, non in carne fidentes. Haec admonitio non quid faciendum, sed quid vitandum sit, docet. Monet autem ut a Judaeis se temperent: cavete, inquit a canibus. De canibus est tractatus: nam et ponit scriptura divina esse canes, qui prosint et defensores sint Ecclesiae, sicut David docet in psalmo lxviii, quos dicit saliari e sanguine inimicorum in templo Dei. Et hic adversus canes dicit, a quibus dicit cavendum esse; Judaei scilicet, qui sint, quod operarii sint et mali: operarii enim in operibus exercent vitam, Deum non cognoscentes, et salutem sibi ex operibus sperant; de quibus supra jam dictum quod opera nihil valeant. Intuemini, inquit, proecisionem. Ut apud illos praecisio sit, quod foedam partem corporis praecidunt. Nos autem circumcisio sumus, inquit. Circumcidimus enim omnem malitiam ex cordibus nostris: et id facimus, quia per spiritum Deo servimus, illi autem per carnem; ergo praecisi sunt, non circumcisi. Exultemus, inquit; immo potius, exultamus. Ubi autem exultamus? Non in carne, ut illi, fiduciam habentes, sed in Christo Jesu. Ergo avocate omnem scientiam vestram a Judaica disciplina, ab operibus Judaeorum, a circumcisione Judaica; et circumcisionem cordis habetote; ut per spiritum Deo serviamus et exultemus in Christo. Illi autem in carne exultent; inde fiduciam habentes, quia in carne circumcisi sunt, se posse servari, et aeternam vitam mereri.
“For the rest, brothers, rejoice in the Lord: to write the same things to you is not tiresome to me, and for you it is plain.” Rejoice, he says, in the Lord, O brothers, because it is not tiresome to me to write the same things to you, and it profits you greatly. What I write is firm and safe. The Greek put it so, saying “firm” and “safe”; the Latin says “plain.” “Beware of the dogs, look out for the evil workers, look at the cutting off. For we are the circumcision, who serve God through the spirit, and exult in Christ Jesus, not trusting in the flesh.” This admonition teaches not what is to be done, but what is to be avoided. He warns them to keep themselves from the Jews: “beware,” he says, “of the dogs.” There is a treatment about dogs: for divine Scripture also sets down that there are dogs that are useful and are defenders of the church, as David teaches in Psalm 68, whom he says … from the blood of enemies in the temple of God. And here he speaks against dogs, from whom he says one must beware; the Jews, namely, who they are, that they are workers, and evil: for workers spend their life in works, not knowing God, and hope for salvation from works; of whom it has already been said above that works avail nothing. “Look,” he says, “at the cutting off.” So that among them it is a cutting off, because they cut off a shameful part of the body. But we, he says, are the circumcision. For we circumcise all malice from our hearts: and we do this because we serve God through the spirit, but they through the flesh; so they are cut off, not circumcised. Let us exult, he says; or rather, we exult. And where do we exult? Not in the flesh, having confidence like them, but in Christ Jesus. So call away all your knowledge from the Jewish discipline, from the works of the Jews, from Jewish circumcision; and have circumcision of the heart, so that we may serve God through the spirit and exult in Christ. But let them exult in the flesh, having confidence from there, because they are circumcised in the flesh, that they can be saved and merit eternal life.
3.4PL 8:1218b–1219a
Quanquam ego habeam etiam in carne fiduciam. Multis modis probatur Judaeos omnem fiduciam in carne habere et in circumcisione: siquidem etiam sic interpretati sunt Judaei, cum salus proveniret circumciso Moyse: unde intelligi licet Judaeos etiam de carne, et magis in carne, fiduciam gerere. Sed hoc Paulus docet, si in carne, inquit, est fiducia, id est in circumcisione; magis mihi est: ego enim in carne, inquit, fiduciam habeo. Denique ita supponitur, si quis alter putat se in carne confidere, magis ego. Et docet, quare in carne fiduciam si aliquis habeat, magis ipse habeat. Et sic ostendit personam suam totam omni modo Judaicam, circumcisione, genere, tribu, gente, lege, administratione in lege, studio etiam vitae. Et tamen omnia haec circa Judaicam compleverit disciplinam; ista, inquam, cuncta damno sibi esse dixerit propter Christum, et propter eminentiam carnis ejus. Haec igitur omnia in propositione sic probabuntur. Circumcisus sum octava die; haec circumcisio est. Genere, inquit, ex genere Israel. Item tribu, Benja– min. Item gente, hebroeus ex hebroeis. Item lege, secundum legem pharisoeus. Item studio, secundum oemulationem persequens Ecclesiam. Item vita, secundum justitiam, quoe est in lege, cum essem sine reprehensione. His ergo omnibus se probavit magis fi– duciam habere in carne et in circumcisione; quae omnia Judaicae disciplinae habuerit, et in sanguine, et in gente, et in animo, et in vita. Quod autem dixit secundum oemulationem persequens Ecclesiam; ut magnum studium pro synagoga habens, ecclesiam persequeretur. Item quod ait secundum justitiam, hoc est per mores et vitam, unde homo Justificatur; in lege tamen Judaeorum ait. Cum essem sine reprehensione, ut nullum crimen admiserim, fecerimque omnia quae lex jussit. Ipsa est enim justitia apud Judaeos ex lege. Verum cum justitia nunc nobis Christianis a Christo sit, et propter ipsum justificemur; Illa, inquit, quoe erant mihi in lucro, hoec pro damno esse duxi: hoc est damnum mihi facere intellexi, habens omnia illa vilia propter Christum.
“Although I too might have confidence in the flesh.” It is proved in many ways that the Jews have all confidence in the flesh and in circumcision: since the Jews even interpreted it so, when salvation came to Moses by circumcision: from which it can be understood that the Jews bear confidence also from the flesh, and more in the flesh. But Paul teaches this: if, he says, there is confidence in the flesh, that is, in circumcision, I have more: for I, he says, have confidence in the flesh. Then it is set down thus: “if anyone else thinks he has confidence in the flesh, I more.” And he teaches why, if anyone has confidence in the flesh, he himself has more. And so he shows that his whole person is Jewish in every way: by circumcision, race, tribe, nation, law, office in the law, and also zeal of life. And yet, though he had fulfilled all these things with regard to the Jewish discipline, all these, I say, he said were loss to him for the sake of Christ, and for the sake of the eminence of his flesh. All these, then, will be proved thus in the statement. “Circumcised on the eighth day”: this is circumcision. By race, he says, “of the race of Israel.” Likewise by tribe, “Benjamin.” Likewise by nation, “a Hebrew of Hebrews.” Likewise by law, “according to the law a Pharisee.” Likewise by zeal, “according to zeal persecuting the church.” Likewise by life, “according to the righteousness which is in the law, since I was without reproach.” By all these, then, he proved that he had more confidence in the flesh and in circumcision; having all things of the Jewish discipline, in blood, in nation, in mind, and in life. And as to his saying “according to zeal persecuting the church”: as having great zeal for the synagogue, he persecuted the church. Likewise as to his saying “according to righteousness,” that is, by morals and life, from which a man is justified; but he says in the law of the Jews. “Since I was without reproach,” so that I committed no crime and did all that the law commanded. For this is righteousness among the Jews from the law. But since righteousness now comes to us Christians from Christ, and we are justified because of him: “Those things which were gain to me, these I have counted as loss”: that is, I understood that they caused me loss, holding all those things cheap for Christ’s sake.
3.8PL 8:1219a–1219d
Verum et hoc adjecit, Propter eminentiam Christi Jesu Domini nostri. Graecos au– tem habet propter eminentiam cognitionis Domini nostri Jesu Christi: ut illa ostendat et parva esse et minima et magis contraria, si sola sint; quia damno sunt, inquit; et ista Christi eminentia est quae excellat et vincat omnia. Propter quem um– versis detrimentis affectus sum, et ut stercora existi– mo. Concludit sensum, omnia se illa contemnere, et detrimenta omnia pati propter Christum, ut lucri Christum faciat. Quid autem est detrimentis affectus sum? Omnia illa, quae gloriosa mihi fuerant, et de sanguine, et de tribu, et de gente, et quod in lege fueram pharisaeus, et quod justitiam sic servassem, ut sine reprehensione essem; his omnibus projectis, detrimenta omnium rerum sustinui; et illa omnia ut stercora existimavi vel existimo. Melius enim sic legimus, quam existimor: nam et graecus ita posuit, fywpat, non ut ipse ab aliis existimetur, sed ut existimet illa omnia superiora, ut stercora; atque illa abjiciat, et justa sententia Christum lucrifaciat. Ipse subjungit. Et inveniar in illo. Hoc est enim Christum lucrifacere, jam in eo esse, et fide illi jungi, et ipsum sentire, ipsum habere. Non meam justitiam habens, quoe ex lege est. Illam scilicet quam supra exposui, cum sine reprehensione viverem: tunc enim quasi mea justitia est, vel nostra, cum moribus nostris justitiam Dei mereri nos putamus perfectam per mores. At non, inquit, hanc habens justitiam. Sed quam? Illam subjungit: Sed eam, quoe est ex fide Christi, quam proedixit; ex Deo justitiam, ex fide. Hanc ergo justitiam, inquit, habet; non illam, quae ex lege est, quae in operibus est, ut dixi, et carnali disciplina; sed hanc quae ex Deo procedit. Quae illa est? justitia ex fide, quae est fides ex fide Christi, id est ex nobis in Christum. Et plenissime subjecit, quae sit fides nobis in Christum, unde nobis justitia est.
But he also added this: “Because of the eminence of Christ Jesus our Lord.” The Greek has, “because of the eminence of the knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ”: to show that those things are both small and least and rather contrary, if they stand alone; because they are loss, he says; and this eminence of Christ is what excels and conquers all things. “For whose sake I have suffered the loss of all things, and count them as dung.” He concludes the thought: that he despises all those things and suffers every loss for Christ’s sake, so that he may gain Christ. And what is “I have suffered the loss”? All those things that had been glorious to me, of blood, of tribe, of nation, and that I had been a Pharisee in the law, and that I had kept righteousness so as to be without reproach: all these cast away, I have borne the loss of all things; and I have counted or count all those things as dung. For we read it better so, “I count,” than “I am counted”: for the Greek too put it so, hēgoumai, not that he is counted by others, but that he counts all those former things as dung; and casts them away, and by a just judgment gains Christ. He himself adds: “And that I may be found in him.” For this is to gain Christ: to be now in him, to be joined to him by faith, to perceive him, to have him. “Not having my own righteousness, which is from the law.” That, namely, which I set out above, when I lived without reproach: for then it is as it were my righteousness, or ours, when we think we merit God’s righteousness by our morals, perfected through morals. But not, he says, having this righteousness. But which? He adds it: “But that which is from the faith of Christ,” which he foretold; “the righteousness from God, from faith.” This righteousness, then, he says, he has; not that which is from the law, which is in works, as I said, and fleshly discipline; but this which proceeds from God. What is it? Righteousness from faith, which is faith from the faith of Christ, that is, from us toward Christ. And he added most fully what our faith toward Christ is, from which righteousness comes to us.
3.10PL 8:1220a–1220c
Ad cognoscendum eum, et virtutem resurrectionis ejus, et societatem passionum ejus: particeps oneris mortis ejus; si quo modo obvius fiam in resurrec– tione, quoe est ex mortuis. Exponit fidem quam habemus in Christo, quam persuadere se dixit et annuntiare Philippensibus, quae procedit ex Deo, justitia ex fide, ex fide quam subjungit ad eum cognoscendum, quid sit, qui ipse sit, unde sit. Utique de Christo haec deinde adjunxit, et virtutem resurrectionis ejus. Vel in eo quod resurrexit virtute; magna enim virtus resurgere a mortuis: vel in eo quod ad nostram salvationem resurrexit: haec enim est virtus resurrectionis ejus. Atque idem sequentibus probavit: etenim, inquit, si societatem passionum ejus habemus, sicut ipse dixit, quia mortis participes fuimus vel sumus. idcirco et participes ejus erimus. Haec virtus est resurrectionis, quia est societas nobis passionum ejus. Quae autem est ista societas? quia qui Christum credimus, passiones toleramus, et omnes passiones, utique ad crucem atque ad mortem: quibus his omni– bus ex cognitione et ex passionum societate resurrectio provenit; et inde cum participes mortis Onerisque ejus sumus, aliquo modo obvii efficimur, ut in resurrectione obvii veniamus, quae resurrectio est a mortuis. Ecce quae fides in Christum est; et hanc docere se dicit, docens quid in vita agendum sit; scilicet ut socii passionis Christi, et hoc credamus, et haec nobis fides sit, quia veniemus in virtute resurrectionis ejus; participes scilicet effecti oneris mortis ejus: ut ob hoc aliquo modo obvii fiamus in resurrectione, quae est ex mortuis. Hoc praemium est, labor ille; illa vita, hoc meritum et gloria.
“To know him, and the power of his resurrection, and the fellowship of his sufferings: sharing in the burden of his death; if by any means I may come to meet him in the resurrection which is from the dead.” He sets out the faith we have in Christ, which he said he urges and proclaims to the Philippians, which proceeds from God, righteousness from faith, from the faith which he adds: to know him, what he is, who he is, where he is from. Surely it is of Christ that he then added: “and the power of his resurrection.” Either in that he rose by power: for it is a great power to rise from the dead; or in that he rose for our salvation: for this is the power of his resurrection. And he proved the same by what follows: for, he says, if we have fellowship in his sufferings, as he himself said, because we were or are sharers in his death, therefore we shall also be sharers in him. This is the power of the resurrection: that there is for us fellowship in his sufferings. And what is this fellowship? That we who believe Christ endure sufferings, and all sufferings, even to the cross and to death: from all of which, from knowledge and from fellowship in sufferings, resurrection comes; and from there, since we are sharers in his death and its burden, we are in some way made to meet him, so that in the resurrection we may come to meet him, the resurrection which is from the dead. See what faith in Christ is; and this he says he teaches, teaching what must be done in life: namely, that as companions of Christ’s passion we both believe this and have this faith, that we shall come in the power of his resurrection, having been made sharers in the burden of his death: so that for this we may in some way come to meet him in the resurrection which is from the dead. This is the reward; that is the labor; that is the life; this the merit and glory.
3.12PL 8:1220c–1221c
Non propterea quod jam acceperim aut jam consummatus sim. Fortius hoc adjecit de se quidem memorans; sed nostrum est ad nos revocare quod de se Paulus dicit. Quid autem istud est? ut illis laboribus, et illa tolerantia societatis in morte atque passionibus, obviam ire possimus, simulque consurgere in resurrectione mortuorum. Sed non propterea, Inquit, haec ego ago, quod jam ista acceperim aut consummatus jam sim: quamdiu enim quisque vivit, nondum haec accipit aut consummatur: adhuc enim in societate passionum ejus versatur: quippe cum usque ad mortem sit societas passionum. Nondum ergo accipit neque consummatur, sed perseverat usque vitae exitum, in iisdem Istis laboribus et vera societate passionum ejus manens, tunc poterit in resurrectione ejus ex mortuis obvius ire. In quo tamen etiam dubitationem posuit dicendo si quo modo obvius fiam. Quod adhuc enim vivit, Ideo dixit si quo modo. Nam cum perseverat in societate passionum, qui etiam ipsa morte consimilis extiterit, nulla dubitatio est quin obvius fiat in resurrectione. Quid est autem obvium fieri in resurrectione mortuorum? Perfecta atque plena vita uniuscujusque et exacta ex societate passionum Christi omnibus modis eo tempore cum resurrectio fit a mortuis Id est cum resuscitantur mortui. Ille, ut Paulus de se loquens dicit, ille, inquam, qui plena societate passionum ejus egit vitam, obvius Christo fit: non resuscitatur, sed obvius Christo fit. Alii resuscitantur tantummodo; at vero perfecti, et omni genere passi quemadmodum Christo obvii erunt, et obvii ibunt venienti Christo; sicut et ipse alibi dixit. Merito igitur si quo modo ait, quod adhuc in vita sit. Et merito adjunxit, non propterea quod jam acceperim, aut jam consummatus sim: sector autem ut aliquando comprehendar, in quo et comprehensus a Christo sum. Vides quod adhuc in vita se esse dicat, et idcirco supra dubitaverit. Sectator enim adhuc per pas– siones omnes Christum, ut comprehendat Christum, id est ut perveniat ad Christum omnibus passionibus ejus particeps factus. Christus enim omnibus passionibus suis liberavit omnes sequentes; et quodammodo comprehendit universos, sed qui sequerentur. Is qui sequi et comprehendere Christum vult, in omnibus passionibus sequi Christum debet, ut comprehendat Christum in eo in quo et comprehensus a Christo est. Nam si passionibus suis Christus liberavit omnes, comprehendit omnes passionibus suis; in his igitur sumus. Id est particeps Christo factus per ejus passiones, in eo comprehendit Christum, in quo comprehensus a Christo est.
“Not because I have already received, or am already perfected.” He added this more strongly, speaking of himself indeed; but it is for us to refer to ourselves what Paul says of himself. And what is this? That by those labors, and that endurance of fellowship in death and sufferings, we may be able to go to meet him, and at the same time rise together in the resurrection of the dead. But not because, he says, I do these things, that I have already received them or am already perfected: for as long as anyone lives, he does not yet receive these things or is not perfected: for he is still engaged in fellowship with his sufferings, since the fellowship of sufferings lasts until death. So he does not yet receive nor is perfected, but perseveres until the end of life, remaining in those same labors and true fellowship with his sufferings; then he will be able to go to meet him in his resurrection from the dead. In this he also placed doubt, saying, “if by any means I may come to meet him.” Because he still lives, therefore he said “if by any means.” For when one perseveres in fellowship with the sufferings, and becomes like him even in death itself, there is no doubt that he will come to meet him in the resurrection. And what is it to come to meet him in the resurrection of the dead? The perfect and full life of each, completed from fellowship with Christ’s sufferings in every way, at that time when the resurrection from the dead comes about, that is, when the dead are raised. He, as Paul says speaking of himself, he, I say, who has led his life in full fellowship with his sufferings, comes to meet Christ: he is not merely raised, but comes to meet Christ. Others are only raised; but the perfect, who have suffered in every way like Christ, will meet him, and will go to meet Christ as he comes; as he himself said elsewhere. Rightly, then, he says “if by any means,” because he is still in life. And rightly he added, “not because I have already received, or am already perfected; but I pursue, if I may at last lay hold, in that in which I also have been laid hold of by Christ.” You see that he says he is still in life, and therefore he doubted above. For he still pursues Christ through all sufferings, so as to lay hold of Christ, that is, to reach Christ, having become a sharer in all his sufferings. For Christ by all his sufferings freed all who follow; and in a way laid hold of all, but those who would follow. Whoever wishes to follow and lay hold of Christ ought to follow Christ in all sufferings, so as to lay hold of Christ in that in which he has also been laid hold of by Christ. For if Christ freed all by his sufferings, he laid hold of all by his sufferings; in these, then, we are. That is, having become a sharer with Christ through his sufferings, he lays hold of Christ in that in which he was laid hold of by Christ.
3.13PL 8:1221c–1222c
Fratres, ego me non arbitror comprehendisse. Adhuc perseverat in eo quod dixi quod adhuc vivit, et idcirco non Jam acceperit nec consummatus sit, nec jam comprehenderit. Hoc enim dixit, sector autem ut aliquo modo comprehendam. Ergo arbitror nondum me comprehendisse ut exinde intelligant Philippenses quam longe a beneficiis liberationis sint, cum ipse ille Paulus in tot passionibus Christi saepe Versatus, caesus, inclusus, feris objectus, et caeteris malis oneratus, nondum tamen se arbitretur comprehendisse Christum; quippe cum adhuc vivat et supersit. Magna illa participatio passionis per quam vere jungimur, si Christum etiam in passione imitemur. Unum adhuc tamen quoe sunt retro transmittens in oblivionem, in ea vero quoe in primo sunt extendens me secundum regulam, sector ad bravium supernoe vocationis in Christo Jesu. Quoniam, ut diximus, ita supra locutus si quo modo obvius fiam in resurrectione mortuorum, et docuimus cur sit posita ista dubitatio quod adhuc vivat, et multa possent accidere, maximeque ipsa itia mors; idcirco adjunxit non se arbitrari comprehendisse adhuc Christum. Sed quiddam habere etiam nunc in sententia se ostendit; unum, inquit. Quid illud est? ut omnia quae praeterita sunt in oblivionem mittantur, sequatur tantum quae futura sunt in primo; id est in his quae ante nos prima sunt, et sequenda secundum regulam disciplinamque praeceptorum, a Christo ut ad bravium super(??) vocationis. in Christo tamen Jesu, venire possimus. Duo igitur praecepta sunt ad reliquam vitam christiano ordine viventi, et qui ex regula adhuc vivat, ut ea omnia quae egit, bene licet recteque agat, non sibi tamen in memoria teneat, tamquam inde mereatur quae consequi habet; sed mittat in oblivionem, semper deinde quasi nova sequatur, quae restant, secundum regulam tamen vivens, ac se in ea semper extendens, atque usque ad exitum mortis custodiens regulam Christiani, ut possit ad bravium venire. Nam meminisse praeteritorum, etiam recte factorum primum, merito suo attribuentis et vindicantis est; cum haec nec nostra sint, et non operibus nostris gratiam consequamur. Deinde nescio quomodo in ea quae in primo sunt, id est quae consequuntur, negligentes sumus, fiducia quia multa facimus. Unde praecepit apostolus, retro quae sunt, transmittenda esse omnia in oblivionem. Potest accipi etiam illa quae diximus, sed diversa vita qua viximus: ut ipse Paulus, quod judaeus fuit, quod insectator legis, et caetera: ut haec dixerit retro esse, et in oblivionem mittenda; ac si nostrum unusquisque vitam praeteritam in oblivionem debeat mittere. Verum fortior ille sensus, etiam bene gestam, et recte secundum regulam actam vitam praeteritam, in oblivionem mittere debeamus, et in ea quae in primo sunt nos extendere secundum regulam, ut sequi Christum possimus ad bravium supernoe, inquit, vocationis. Ex eo enim jam Christiani sumus, vocati a Deo sumus. Haec superna vocatio est: nemo enim ad Deum vel a Deo vocatur nisi in Jesu Christo. Ipse enim est janua, ipse propitiator, conciliator ipse: et hoc multis partibus docuimus: et sic vita nobis est atque esse debet; ut duce Christo praecunte, id est fide nostra in Christo, ad bravium venire possimus.
“Brothers, I do not consider that I have laid hold.” He still persists in what I said, that he is still living, and therefore has not yet received, nor is perfected, nor has yet laid hold. For this is what he said: “but I pursue, if in some way I may lay hold.” So I consider that I have not yet laid hold, so that the Philippians may understand from this how far they are from the benefits of liberation, since that very Paul, often engaged in so many of Christ’s sufferings—beaten, imprisoned, thrown to beasts, and burdened with other evils—yet does not consider that he has laid hold of Christ; since he still lives and survives. Great is that sharing in suffering through which we are truly joined, if we imitate Christ even in suffering. “One thing, however: sending into forgetfulness what is behind, and stretching myself toward what is in front, according to the rule, I pursue toward the prize of the heavenly calling in Christ Jesus.” Since, as we said, he spoke above thus, “if by any means I may come to meet him in the resurrection of the dead,” and we taught why this doubt was set down—that he still lives, and many things could happen, above all death itself—therefore he added that he does not consider that he has yet laid hold of Christ. But he shows that he has something even now in his purpose: “one thing,” he says. What is it? That all that is past be sent into forgetfulness, and he follow only what is to come in front; that is, in those things which are first before us and must be followed according to the rule and discipline of the precepts, so that we may come from Christ to the prize of the heavenly calling, yet in Christ Jesus. There are, then, two precepts for the rest of life for one living in Christian order and still living by the rule: that all the things he has done, though he does them well and rightly, he should not keep in his memory as though he merited from them what he is to obtain; but send them into forgetfulness, and always follow, as if new, what remains, yet living according to the rule, and always stretching himself in it, and keeping the rule of a Christian until the end in death, so that he may come to the prize. For to remember past things, even things rightly done, belongs first to one who attributes them to his own merit and claims them; whereas these are not ours, and we do not obtain grace by our works. Then, somehow, we become negligent toward the things in front, that is, those that follow, out of confidence that we do many things. Hence the apostle commanded that the things behind should all be sent into forgetfulness. What we have said can also be taken of a different life we have lived: as Paul himself, that he was a Jew, a zealot of the law, and the rest: so that he called these “behind” and to be sent into forgetfulness; as if each of us ought to send his past life into forgetfulness. But the stronger sense is that we ought to send into forgetfulness even a past life well conducted and rightly lived according to the rule, and stretch ourselves toward the things in front according to the rule, so that we may follow Christ to the prize of the heavenly, he says, calling. For from the time we are Christians, we have been called by God. This is the heavenly calling: for no one is called to God or by God except in Jesus Christ. For he is the door, he the propitiator, he the reconciler: and this we have taught in many parts: and so our life is, and ought to be, that with Christ leading, that is, by our faith in Christ, we may come to the prize.
3.15PL 8:1222c–1223c
Quicumque itaque perfecti sumus, hoc sentiamus: et si quid aliter sapitis, et hoc Deus vobis revelavit. Hinc intelligi licet, vere nos exposuisse de his quae supra diximus, ut retro transmittamus in oblivionem ea quae sunt gesta a nobis in recta regula. Siquidem jungit: quicumque itaque perfecti, retro mittant in oblivionem omnia quae gesta sunt. Non enim meritis nostris, sed Dei gratia, consequimur bravium. Sic igitur hortatur: hoc sentiamus, inquit. Qui illi hoc sentiant? Quicumque perfecti sumus. Quid autem sentiamus? Ut quae sunt retro, transmittamus in oblivionem, et praesens enim tempus, id est quod nunc gerimus, in oblivionem transmittendum est. Utique si praesens, et praeteritum scilicet, et quae in vita habuimus: et ad ea quae in primo sunt, extendamus nosmetipsos secundum regulam. Hoc, inquit, sentiamus omnes, et omnes perfecti. Quod vero adjungit, et si quid aliter sapitis, et hoc vobis Deus revelavit, si plenus est sensus, et se tenens non ad posteriora conjunctus, sic intelligendus est: et si est aliquid de hoc ipso, quod nos diximus, quod vos aliter accipiatis, et intelligatis, sapiatis concedo vobis: quoniam enim de perfectis loquitur, sic enim dixit, quicumque itaque perfecti sumus. Ergo qui perfecti, etiamsi aliter sapitis: quae conclusit ad concessionem, et hoc Deus vobis revelavit, bonum est, quoniam hoc et hoc, quod vos sapitis, et id quod ego dixi. Si autem non est istud, concedentes, pendebit sensus, ut ita dictum sit, si quid aliter sapitis, et tamen hoc vobis Deus revelavit: adjungit quod subjunctum est: Tamen id sapiamus ad quod pervenimus, id est, quod nos docuimus, et ad quod instituti sumus. Sic enim subjungit, verumtamen in id quod pervenimus, in id ipsum sapiamus, in eodem ambulemus. Hoc est, ex quo Evangelium vobis pronuntiavi, et ad hoc usque pervenimus genere vivendi et intelligendi; id ipsum, inquit, sapiamus, et in eodem ambulemus; in id scilicet quod pervenimus: etenim dicendo tamen, quasi repudiat. Quod supra est non admittimus, et sensus talis: est quidem istud tolerabile et faciendum; verumtamen illud maxime. Ergo et si aliter sapitis, et si hoc Deus vobis revelavit, quo aliter sapitis; verumtamen in id quod pervenimus, in id ipsum sapiamus. Quid autem illud est, in id quod pervenimus? Quod olim ex meis monitis accepistis, et quod nunc a me praeceptum est: in id enim pervenimus, ex omni admonitione et praeceptis: inquit autem, pervenimus; praeceptis nostris scilicet; ut quae retro sunt transmittentes in oblivionem, in ea quae in primo sunt, extendamus nos secundum regulam, ut ad bravium supernae vocationis veniamus in Jesu Christo. In eo ergo, inquit, ambulemus. Adeo de vita illa et de praecepto ad vitam superior ratio est. Siquidem supra dictum, quae sunt retro transmittentes in oblivionem, in primo quae sunt extendamus nos. Hoc est enim in eo ambulemus.
“Whoever, then, are perfect, let us think this: and if you think anything otherwise, this too God has revealed to you.” From here it may be understood that we have truly explained what we said above, that we should send back into forgetfulness the things done by us under the right rule. Since he joins: “whoever, then, are perfect,” let them send back into forgetfulness all that has been done. For we obtain the prize not by our merits but by God’s grace. So, then, he exhorts: “let us think this,” he says. Who should think this? “Whoever of us are perfect.” And what should we think? That we send into forgetfulness what is behind—and even the present time, that is, what we are now doing, must be sent into forgetfulness. Surely if the present, then also the past, and the things we had in life: and that we stretch ourselves toward the things in front according to the rule. This, he says, let us all think, and all be perfect. And as to what he adds, “and if you think anything otherwise, this too God has revealed to you”: if the sense is complete, holding itself and not joined to what follows, it must be understood thus: and if there is anything about this very thing that we have said which you take and understand otherwise, think so, I grant you: for he speaks of the perfect; for so he said, “whoever, then, of us are perfect.” So you who are perfect, even if you think otherwise: which he concluded as a concession, “this too God has revealed to you,” it is good, since both this which you think and what I said. But if this is not so, conceding, the sense will hang, so that it is said thus: “if you think anything otherwise, and yet God has revealed this to you”; he adds what is joined: “Yet let us think that to which we have attained,” that is, what we taught, and to which we have been instructed. For so he adds: “nevertheless, to what we have attained, let us think that very thing, let us walk in the same.” That is, from the time I proclaimed the gospel to you, and to this point we have attained in the manner of living and understanding; that very thing, he says, let us think, and walk in the same; namely in that to which we have attained: for by saying “yet,” he as it were rejects. We do not admit what is above, and the sense is such: this indeed is tolerable and may be done; yet that above all. So even if you think otherwise, and even if God has revealed this to you, by which you think otherwise, “nevertheless, to what we have attained, let us think that very thing.” And what is “to what we have attained”? What you received long ago from my admonitions, and what is now commanded by me: for to this we have attained from all admonition and precepts: and he says “we have attained,” by our precepts, namely; so that, sending into forgetfulness what is behind, we stretch ourselves toward what is in front according to the rule, so that we may come to the prize of the heavenly calling in Jesus Christ. In this, then, he says, let us walk. So the preceding reasoning concerns that life and the precept for life. Since it was said above, “sending into forgetfulness what is behind, let us stretch ourselves toward what is in front.” This is “let us walk in it.”
3.17PL 8:1223c–1224b
Imitatores mei estote, fratres. Opportune ad sententiam, quam loquebamur; ut nihil ipsi novi faciant, etsi aliter sapiunt, etsi aliquid a Deo revelatum habent. Imitatores mei, inquit, estote, fratres; ut quae ego ago, quae praecipio, quae in vita exerceo, quod sequor, hoc quoque vos imitemini, et sequamini. Et contemplamini eos qui ita incedunt, quemadmodum exemplum habetis nos. Praeceptum dederat quid agendum perfectis viris esset, et postea adjecerat ne aliter saperent, et quasi concesserat; concludens tamen ut se potius sequerentur, atque ita ambularent quemadmodum ipse. Nunc plena hortatione cum diceret, imitatores mei estote, adjecit exemplum, quo facilius persuaderet; ideo facere oportere; scilicet quod alii facerent: Contemplamini, inquit, eos qui ita incedunt, quemadmodum exemplum habetis nos. Duo conclusit, qui ita incedunt quemadmodum nos, et in eo ipso ut et ipse his esset exemplum breviter collocavit, et qui aliis esset, et qui his esse deberet. Scilicet quemadmodum illi me imitantur, etiam vos habeatis et exemplum. Multi enim incedunt, de quibus vobis soepe dixi. Plus adjecit, ut pauci essent qui illum viderentur imitari: multi, inquit, ita incedunt. Et adjecit aliud argumentum, ne hodie vobis exemplum proferam ad exhortationem, multi, inquit, sunt qui incedunt sicuti nos, de quibus saepe dixi. Ergo non ad tempus protulit eos qui ita incederent; siquidem de ipsis quod ita incede– rent, saepe jam dixerit.
“Be imitators of me, brothers.” Fittingly for the thought we were discussing: that they should do nothing new themselves, even if they think otherwise, even if they have something revealed by God. “Be imitators of me,” he says, “brothers”; so that what I do, what I command, what I practice in life, what I follow, this you too imitate and follow. “And observe those who walk so, as you have us for an example.” He had given the precept of what was to be done by perfect men, and afterward had added that they should not think otherwise, and as it were conceded it; yet concluding that they should rather follow him and walk as he himself did. Now, with full exhortation, when he said, “be imitators of me,” he added an example, so as to persuade more easily: that they ought to do so because others did: “Observe,” he says, “those who walk so, as you have us for an example.” He has concluded two things: “who walk so, as we do,” and in this very thing he briefly placed that he himself was an example to these, both one who was an example to others and one who ought to be one to them: namely, as they imitate me, so you too should have an example. “For many walk, of whom I have often told you.” He added more, so that there would not seem to be few who imitate him: many, he says, walk so. And he added another argument: lest I bring forward an example to you today for exhortation, there are many, he says, who walk as we do, of whom I have often spoken. So he did not bring forward for the occasion those who walked so; since he had already often spoken of them, that they walked so.
3.19PL 8:1224b–1225c
Nunc autem etiam lacrymabundus dico, inimicos crucis Christi; quorum Deus venter, et gloria in turpitudine eorum qui terrena sapiunt. Major hortatio est, cum ex metu sit. Supra enim ex commodis et utilitatibus. Nam est exhortatio quemadmodum vivant, ad hoc ipsum quod supra praecepit, cum ipse ad eamdem vitam compellat et adigat Philippenses, et dederit rursus aliud argumentum quod jam multi eodem modo vivunt, et multi quos jam ita vivere ipse Philippensibus Paulus saepe dixerit. Haec utilitas exhortationis majore ratione firmatur, quid mali pati habeant si aliter vixerint, et ut dixi major est persuasio ex timore. Adjecit etiam affectum, dicturus mala quae patiantur illi, qui aliter vivunt dicendo: lacrymabundus dico. Doleo enim et lacrymo, quia qui inimici crucis sunt, id est qui non credunt in hoc Evangelium, quod scilicet credant in Christum hominem, id est qui in homine fuerit, qui natus ex Maria sit, crucifixus sit. Omnes igitur haeretici qui neque crucifixum, neque in homine Christum accipiunt, qui multi et varii sint; ii, inquam, finem habebunt interitum. Alii enim dixerunt hominem fuisse, non in homine fuisse. Alii negant omnino natum in carne, alii negant crucifixum. Omnes ii haeretici, ut dixi, atque horum similes interituri sunt. Hoc enim dixit, quorum finis est interitus: quae utique consequentur hujusmodi homines. Et quid patientur, et quid sint, ita numerat, quid patientur, quorum finis est interitus; quid sint, quorum Deus venter; quid consequentur, et gloria, inquit, in turpitudine eorum? Quemadmodum sapiant, adjunxit: qui terrena sapiunt? De interitu; quod finis eorum sit interitus, qui haec non credunt, id est qui inimici crucis sunt. Hoc enim dixit, inimicos crucis Christi esse, crucem Christi non credere. Hi, inquam, perituri, et finis his est interitus. At vero istud qui non credunt, id est qui inimici crucis Christi sunt, quomodo Deum habent ventrem, de quibus dixit, quorum Deus venter est? Duo quodammodo sunt, id est unum de duobus, qui inimici crucis Christi sunt: aut enim carnaliter sentientes crucem Christi rident, cum hominem Christum putant in crucem sublatum; non mysterio secundum Evangelium Christum in homine crucifixum, per quod peccatum vicit et triumphavit potestates, et triumphavit per carnem crucifixam: hanc, inquam, crucem in mysterio habemus. Alii, ut dixi, ut secundum hominem, vere tantum hominem accipiunt crucem: et idcirco inimici sunt cruci, et hi quia carnaliter sentiunt, contemnunt mysterium crucis: et hi, ut dixi, de carne sentiunt, et nihil aliud quam de carne extimant, et illis Deus venter est, et gloria in turpitudine eorum est, et hi sunt, qui terrena sapiunt, quorum tamen finis est interitus. Aut rursus illi qui spiritalem sentiunt Christum, et non intelligunt illum in carne, neque crucifixum; et idcirco inimici sunt crucis Christi, et ipsi finem habebunt interitum. Et haec pars conclusa de illis est: quamquam ista pars pertineat et ad illos qui de Christo carnaliter sentiunt; at vero haec tria, quae sequuntur, ad eos pertinent qui de Christo carnaliter sentiunt; ut Deus eorum venter sit, et gloria in turpitudine eorum et terrena sapiunt.
“But now I say even with tears, enemies of the cross of Christ; whose god is the belly, and the glory in the shame of those who mind earthly things.” A greater exhortation comes when it is from fear. For above it was from advantages and benefits. For there is an exhortation on how they should live, to this very thing which he commanded above, since he himself compels and drives the Philippians to the same life, and has given again another argument, that many already live in the same way, many whom Paul himself has often told the Philippians already live so. This benefit of exhortation is made firm by a greater reason, what evil they will suffer if they live otherwise; and, as I said, persuasion from fear is greater. He also added emotion, being about to speak of the evils that those who live otherwise will suffer, by saying, “I say with tears.” For I grieve and weep, because those who are enemies of the cross, that is, who do not believe in this gospel, namely that they should believe in Christ as man, that is, who was in a man, who was born of Mary, was crucified. All heretics, then, who accept neither Christ crucified nor Christ in a man, who are many and various, these, I say, will have destruction as their end. For some said that he was a man, not that he was in a man. Others deny entirely that he was born in the flesh, others deny that he was crucified. All these heretics, as I said, and those like them, will perish. For this is what he said: “whose end is destruction”: which surely will befall men of this kind. And what they will suffer and what they are he lists thus: what they will suffer, “whose end is destruction”; what they are, “whose god is the belly”; what they will obtain, “and glory,” he says, “in their shame”? How they think he added: “who mind earthly things”? Of destruction: that their end is destruction who do not believe these things, that is, who are enemies of the cross. For this is what he said, that to be enemies of the cross of Christ is not to believe in the cross of Christ. These, I say, will perish, and their end is destruction. But those who do not believe this, that is, who are enemies of the cross of Christ, how do they have the belly as god, of whom he said, “whose god is the belly”? There are in a way two kinds, that is, one of two, who are enemies of the cross of Christ: either, thinking in a fleshly way, they laugh at the cross of Christ, since they think that a man, Christ, was raised on the cross; not, by the mystery according to the gospel, Christ crucified in a man, through which he conquered sin and triumphed over the powers, and triumphed through the crucified flesh: this cross, I say, we hold in the mystery. Others, as I said, take the cross as according to man, truly only a man: and therefore they are enemies of the cross, and these, because they think in a fleshly way, despise the mystery of the cross: and these, as I said, think of the flesh and consider nothing but the flesh, and for them the belly is god, and the glory is in their shame, and these are those who mind earthly things, whose end, however, is destruction. Or again those who think of Christ as spiritual, and do not understand him in the flesh, nor crucified; and therefore they are enemies of the cross of Christ, and they too will have destruction as their end. And this part is concluded about them: although this part pertains also to those who think of Christ in a fleshly way; but these three that follow pertain to those who think of Christ in a fleshly way: that their god is the belly, and the glory in their shame, and they mind earthly things.
3.20PL 8:1225c–1225d
Nostra enim conversatio in coelis est. Utique hoc contrarium superiori est; ad istam partem tamen quod dixit terrena sapiunt, aestimando Christum hominem esse, et hominem fuisse, et non in carne fuisse, sed cum carne venisse, sicuti Judaei venturum dicunt, et caeteri haeretici. At nos contra, omnem vitam, et conversationem vivendi in coelis habemus; sentientes de coelo venisse Christum, induisse carnem, in cruce sublatum. Denique sic adjungit: unde etiam salutarem expectamus Dominum nostrum Jesum Christum. Ut et inde venerit, et inde venturus sit. Etenim si inde venturus est, et ante inde venit. Qui enim ascendit, Ipse est et qui descendit. Ergo nos in coelis habemus conversationem, quia inde et Salutarem expectamus Dominum nostrum Jesum Christum, qui venturus est ad judicium postremis temporibus; et erit nobis Salutaris, quia in ipsum credimus, et Christum expectamus.
“For our citizenship is in heaven.” Surely this is the contrary of what precedes; yet in relation to that part in which he said, “who mind earthly things,” thinking that Christ is a man, and was a man, and was not in the flesh, but came with flesh, as the Jews say he will come, and the other heretics. But we, on the contrary, have our whole life and manner of living in heaven, thinking that Christ came from heaven, put on flesh, was raised on the cross. Then he adds thus: “from where we also await the Savior, our Lord Jesus Christ.” So that he both came from there and will come from there. For if he will come from there, he also came from there before. For he who ascended is himself also he who descended. So we have our citizenship in heaven, because from there we also await the Savior, our Lord Jesus Christ, who will come to judgment in the last times; and he will be our Savior, because we believe in him and await Christ.
3.21PL 8:1225d–1227b
Qui transfiguravit corpus humilitatis nostroe, ut sit oequiforme cum corpore glorioe ipsius, secundum operationem potentioe suoe, ut possit etiam universa illi subdere. Et iste locus tenet de resurrectione mysterium. Etenim quod Christus in carne positus implevit ut salvaret animas, ut et carni etiam per resurrectionem immortalitas daretur, virtutes suae crucis operatus est. Et haec omnia expectamus, et ipsum Dominum nostrum Jesum Christum qui, inquit, illo mysterio quo descendit et crucifixus est et resurrexit, humilitatem nostri corporis vel figuram, aut magis corpus humilitatis nostrae transfiguravit. Quomodo istud est? Quia corpus nostrum humile cum resurgit et immutatur, in melius transfiguravit Jesus Christus humilitatem corporis nostri, vel corpus nostrum humile transfiguravit in magnificum. Dat illi scilicet aeternitatem, faciens ipsi indumentum coeleste; ut sit, inquit, aequiforme cum corpore gloriae ipsius. Namque Christus spiritus est, ex quo illi corpus species, et virtus, ipsa species quae virtus est, species gloriae corpus est divinae et aeternae. Cum autem nos resurgentes immutabimur, et spiritales effecti fuerimus et anima et corpore et spiritu, ita enim ista in unum virum concurrunt, atque unus spiritus erunt; si et corpus humilitatis nostrae aequiforme, hoc est ejusdem atque aequalis formae cum corpore gloriae ipsius Christi, ut et nos spiritus simus, ut et ipse spiritus est. Fiet autem hoc secundum operationem potentiae ejus. Omne enim mysterium atque omnis actio Christi hoc operatur hoc complet secundum potentiam suam, ut nos in unum conveniamus; cum et anima et corpus et spiritus erunt, ut ipse spiritus est. Item, quia Deus cum spiritus sit, subjicientur universa Deo cum ad unam virtutem redigentur, et sic, inquit, poterit universa illi subdere, scilicet Deo. Videri potest in continuum et non conjunctum in oratione, cum ita posuit ut possit etiam universa illi subdere, neque praemisit quo referamus illi. Etenim si illi ad Deum revocamus, Deus supra nominatus non est, sit obscurum et non rectum, sed ab interpretatore magis positum quam a Paulo. Quo igitur referimus illi? Constat quidem quoniam ob hoc operatur Christus, uti universa Deo subjiciat; sed hic Dei significatio nulla est. Quo igitur referimus? intelligendum quomodo breviter, et aperte tamen posuerit Deum. Nam cum dixit quod Christus, quem expectamus, transfiguravit corpus humilitatis nostrae, ut ipsum corpus humilitatis nostrae sit aequi– forme cum corpore gloriae ipsius; hic est ubi Dei intelligentia accipitur, et ipse Deus, cum dixit secundum operationem potentiae suae. Omnia enim fecit Christus ut consuleret animis, aeternitatem carni etiam daret, et aequiforme corpus nostrum faceret corpori gloriae suae, sed hoc fecit secundum operationem potentiae suae. Operatus est enim, sed potentia ejus per quam operatus est: Deus autem est; per patrem enim operatur. Christus quidem operatur: scilicet pater in eo est, et per ipsum operatur. Ergo ubi dixit potentioe suoe, illic intelligitur Deus, cui scilicet subdit universa, et propter hoc operatur, ut possit etiam universa illi subdere. Quod autem dixit etiam universa, refertur ad id quod ipse illi subditus. Nam verbum utique quod Christus, subditum est Deo, est enim Deus potentior. Et id multis probatum rebus est. Ille est qui mittit, hic qui mittitur: ille pater, hic filius: hic per quem Operatio est, ille operator. Ergo ista si sic habent, Christus ad Deum ut ipse et subditus sit. Sic enim dictum in Epistola ad Corinthios prima: cum vero subjecta fuerint illi omnia, tunc ipse subditus erit ei, qui sibi subdidit omnia: ut Deus sit omnia in omnibus. An ille sensus est, quod dixit ut possit etiam, ut non solum aequiforme corpus humilitatis nostrae faciat, sed etiam possit illi omnia subdere? Superatis enim omnibus, quae aut carnalia sunt aut creaturae, et mutatis, subdita universa redduntur potentiae Dei, per quam Christus operatur.
“Who transfigured the body of our lowliness, that it may be conformed to the body of his glory, according to the working of his power, so that he may also subject all things to him.” This place too holds the mystery about the resurrection. For what Christ, placed in the flesh, fulfilled in order to save souls, so that immortality might be given also to the flesh through the resurrection, he worked by the powers of his cross. And all these things we await, and our Lord Jesus Christ himself, who, he says, by that mystery by which he descended and was crucified and rose again, transfigured the lowliness or figure of our body, or rather the body of our lowliness. How is this? Because when our lowly body rises and is changed, Jesus Christ has transfigured the lowliness of our body for the better, or has transfigured our lowly body into a magnificent one. He gives it, namely, eternity, making for it a heavenly garment; “that it may be,” he says, “conformed to the body of his glory.” For Christ is spirit, from which there is for him a body, form, and power, the form itself which is power; the form of glory is a divine and eternal body. And when we, rising, are changed, and have been made spiritual in soul and body and spirit—for so these come together into one man, and will be one spirit—if the body of our lowliness too is conformed, that is, of the same and equal form with the body of the glory of Christ himself, so that we too may be spirit, as he too is spirit. And this will come about “according to the working of his power.” For the whole mystery and every action of Christ works this and completes this according to his power: that we come together into one; when soul and body and spirit will be, as he himself is spirit. Likewise, since God is spirit, all things will be subjected to God when they are brought back to one power, and so, he says, he will be able to subject all things to him, namely to God. It may seem to be continuous and not joined in the discourse, since he put it thus, “so that he may also subject all things to him,” and did not first set down to whom we should refer “to him.” For if we refer “to him” to God, God has not been named above; it would be obscure and not right, and set down rather by the translator than by Paul. To whom, then, do we refer “to him”? It is agreed indeed that Christ works for this, to subject all things to God; but here there is no mention of God. To whom, then, do we refer it? It must be understood how briefly, yet plainly, he has set down God. For when he said that Christ, whom we await, transfigured the body of our lowliness, so that that body of our lowliness may be conformed to the body of his glory, here is where the understanding of God is received, and God himself, when he said, “according to the working of his power.” For Christ did all things to take care of souls, to give eternity to the flesh too, and to make our body conformed to the body of his glory; but he did this according to the working of his power. For he worked, but it is his power through which he worked: and that is God; for he works through the Father. Christ indeed works: namely, the Father is in him, and works through him. So where he said “of his power,” there God is understood, to whom, namely, he subjects all things, and for this he works, so that he may also subject all things to him. And as to his saying “also all things,” it refers to the fact that he himself is subject to him. For surely the Word, which is Christ, is subject to God, for God is more powerful. And this is proved by many things. He is the one who sends, this one the one who is sent; he the Father, this one the Son; this one through whom the working is, he the worker. So if these things are so, Christ is toward God as himself also subject. For so it is said in the first letter to the Corinthians: “but when all things have been subjected to him, then he himself will be subject to him who subjected all things to him, that God may be all in all.” Or is that the sense, that he said “so that he may also,” so that he not only makes the body of our lowliness conformed, but also can subject all things to him? For when all things that are either fleshly or creatures have been overcome and changed, all things are rendered subject to the power of God, through which Christ works.
Chapter 4
4.1PL 8:1227b–1228a
Quapropter, fratres dilectissimi, gaudium et corona mea, consistite in Domino. Omnis virtus in christianis charitas est et dilectio, quae fieri non potest si non unam essentiam habeant et in uno consistant, unum sentientes; quod est nunc in Domino, inquit, consistite, o fratres dilectissimi. Ex quo intelligi licet unum illos velle sapere quando fratres, inquit, dilectissimi. Hoc enim provenit, ut se invicem diligant qui unum sentiunt, et in uno consistunt. In quo illo? in Christo scilicet. Cum enim fidem omnes aequaliter in Christo habeant, in illo consistunt. Quod si vos, o Philippenses, id feceritis, eritis gaudium meum et corona mea. Euchodiam rogo, et Syntychen rogo, id ipsum sapere in Domino. Ut et ipsae foeminae unum sapiant in Domino, id est ut Christum credentes, ea quae de evangelio sunt circa Christum sentiant et intelligant. Sed rogo, inquit, exprimens profuturum illis. Non enim mando, non impero, sed rogo.
“Therefore, dearest brothers, my joy and crown, stand firm in the Lord.” Every virtue in Christians is love and charity, which cannot come about unless they have one essence and stand firm in one, thinking one thing; which is now “stand firm,” he says, “in the Lord, O dearest brothers.” From which it may be understood that he wants them to think one thing when he says “dearest brothers.” For this comes about, that those who think one thing and stand firm in one love one another. In what one? In Christ, namely. For since all have faith equally in Christ, they stand firm in him. If you, O Philippians, do this, you will be my joy and my crown. “I ask Euodia, and I ask Syntyche, to think the same thing in the Lord.” That the women themselves may think one thing in the Lord, that is, believing Christ, may think and understand what the gospel holds concerning Christ. But “I ask,” he says, expressing what will profit them. For I do not command, I do not order, but I ask.
4.3PL 8:1228a–1228c
Ita obsecro, et te, germane unijuge, adjuva illas quoe laboraverunt simul mecum in Evangelio, cum Clemente et coeteris adjutoribus meis, quorum nomina sunt in libro vitoe. Supra diximus Epaphroditum promisisse venturum ad Philippenses: postea ostendit quod cum miserit, cum dixit, festinantius itaque misi eum. Ergo quasi hoc adjicitur, ut et ipsum in epistola mandatum habeat, rogetque eum atque obsecret, ut illas scilicet foeminas Euchodiam et Syntychen moneat id ipsum sapere in Domino. Adjuva, inquit, illas quae laborant simul mecum in Evangelio. Quomodo laborant in Evangelio? ut et ipsae vel ipsum Evangelium quod ego adnuntio agnoscant, custodiant, servent; vel ipsae adnuntient, asserant, evangelizent; pro modo enim loquentes de evangelio, id est de Christo et de mysterio toto evangelizant etiam foeminae. Denique sic adjungit cum Clemente et coeteris adjutoribus meis, quorum, inquit, nomina in libro vitoe. Ita enim mysterium memorat quod omnes, qui de Christo fidem habent, et in eo fidem habent, et loquuntur atque insinuant fidem ipsam in Christum hominibus, Velut adjutores sunt evangelistis: et cum ita hoc sit, jam in libro sunt nomina eorum apud Deum, quod in vita aeterna futuri sint. Istum autem esse Epaphroditum, cui ista mandat ut adjuvet foeminas superiores ut unum sentiant. Hinc intelligi licet quia dixit, obsecro te quoque, germane unijuge; quippe de ipso supra sic locutus est: Necessarium tamen existimavi Epaphroditum fratrem meum commilitonem meum. Ita ibi fratrem, hic dixit germane: supra dixit commilitonem: hic dixit unijuge.
“So I beseech you too, true yokefellow, help those women who labored together with me in the gospel, with Clement and my other helpers, whose names are in the book of life.” We said above that Epaphroditus had promised to come to the Philippians: afterward he showed that he had sent him, when he said, “so I have sent him the more speedily.” So this is added as it were so that he too may have the commission in the letter, and he asks and beseeches him to admonish those women, Euodia and Syntyche, to think the same thing in the Lord. “Help,” he says, “those who labor together with me in the gospel.” How do they labor in the gospel? Either so that they themselves acknowledge, guard, and keep the gospel itself which I proclaim; or so that they themselves proclaim it, assert it, preach it; for women too, speaking in their measure about the gospel, that is, about Christ and the whole mystery, preach the gospel. Then he adds thus: “with Clement and my other helpers, whose names,” he says, “are in the book of life.” For so he records the mystery: that all who have faith concerning Christ, and have faith in him, and speak and instill that faith in Christ to people, are as it were helpers of the evangelists: and since this is so, their names are already in the book with God, because they will be in eternal life. And that this is Epaphroditus, to whom he commits these things, to help the aforementioned women to think one thing, may be understood from his saying, “I beseech you too, true yokefellow”; since he spoke of him above thus: “Yet I thought it necessary to send Epaphroditus, my brother, my fellow soldier.” So there he said “brother,” here he said “true”; above he said “fellow soldier,” here he said “yokefellow.”
4.4PL 8:1228c–1229a
Gaudete; modestia vestra nota sit omnibus hominibus. Hoc est quod consequens sit, ut qui unum sentiunt, et in uno fidem habent, de Domino gaudeant, et semper cari sibi invicem sint. Gaudete, inquit, in Domino. Parum istud est; denuo dico, gaudete. Cum enim juncti estis corde, in Domino gaudetis; et cum gaudetis in Domino, juncti corde estis, et consistitis in Domino. Modestia, inquit, vestra nota sit omnibus hominibus. Valde enim ad meritum vitae futurae pertinet et ad regnum in coelis, si modeste vivamus. Modestia enim cognitio est uniuscujusque modum tenens, nec ultra se tendens et extendens. Etenim cum nos hic sumus, humilitatem nostram (quippe cum in alienis sumus) recognosca– mus, et modum teneamus humilitatis nostrae, Deus sublevabit nos. Ergo nota sit, inquit, omnibus hominibus modestia vestra. Quare hoc monet? ut hic placeamus? non: sed ut cognoverit Christus humilitatem nostram, erigat, et modestiam suscipiat. Quid enim adjungit? Dominus prope est. Magna exhortatio magnumque praeceptum et ex vero et ex vi persuasionis. Cum enim jam immineat judicium, et finis istius vitae omnibus adventet, esse nobis properatio debet, ut et bonis moribus magnaque modestia vivamus: prope enim est judicium atque adventus Domini.
“Rejoice; let your moderation be known to all people.” This is what follows: that those who think one thing and have faith in one should rejoice in the Lord and always be dear to one another. “Rejoice,” he says, “in the Lord.” That is too little; “again I say, rejoice.” For when you are joined in heart, you rejoice in the Lord; and when you rejoice in the Lord, you are joined in heart, and stand firm in the Lord. “Let your moderation,” he says, “be known to all people.” For it pertains greatly to the merit of the future life and to the kingdom in the heavens if we live with moderation. For moderation is the knowledge that keeps each one’s measure, neither stretching nor extending beyond itself. For while we are here, let us recognize our lowliness (since we are among things not our own), and keep the measure of our lowliness, and God will lift us up. So let your moderation, he says, be known to all people. Why does he admonish this? That we may please here? No: but so that Christ, having known our lowliness, may raise it and take up our moderation. For what does he add? “The Lord is near.” A great exhortation and a great precept, both from truth and from the force of persuasion. For since judgment is already imminent, and the end of this life is coming upon all, we ought to hasten to live with good morals and great moderation: for the judgment and the coming of the Lord are near.
4.6PL 8:1229a–1229c
Nihil ad sollicitudinem redigatis. Id est nec curam vestri habeatis, neve de mundo mundanisque rebus cogitetis aut solliciti sitis: omnia enim necessaria vobis, et nunc in hoc vitae genere procurat Deus, et meliora in illa vita quae aeterna est. Sed in omni precatione et oratione cum bona gratia petitiones vestroe innotescant apud Deum. Ut omnis actio jam Christiani fidelis et boni et perfecti, omissis omnibus sollicitudinibus (ipsa est enim renuntiatio) precibus vacet et orationi. Preces sunt, rogare Dominum: Oratio est et loqui cum rogas: ipsa est enim oratio, preces cum orali me. Sed quae illa erit oratio? aliquid petens, an nihil? Quid est quod petat ille, qui jam fidelis effectus Deum rogat? Quam Igitur habebit orationem aut petitionem, quippe cum renuntiaverit omnibus mundanis? Ipse monuit ut oremus et precemur cum bona gratia; ut omnibus nobis oratio in precibus gratiarum actio sit, ut gratias agamus; quod consecuti tantum donum, Dei pietate, simus. Hoc enim ait cum bona gratia. Bona autem adjecit, ne inviti faciamus, sed vere gratias agamus, et bonas gratias deinde adjunxit. Quoniam oratio est in precibus, quae potest esse de bona gratia, potest de petitione. Supra cum dixisset cum bona gratia, adjunxit petitiones, inquit, nostroe innotescant penes Deum, Cujus autem non est honesta? Et coelestia ipsa illa quae promittuntur petat ut impicantur Qui petit, utique talia petit quae jam fidelem petere justum est. Ipsa enim cum cogitamus petenda, quae volumus innotescere penes Deum, necessario talia Sunt quae conveniant fideli etiam coelestia speranti et divina omnia, Haec, inquit, id est petitiones vestrae innotescant penes Deum.
“Bring nothing to anxiety.” That is, have no care for yourselves, nor think about the world and worldly things or be anxious: for God provides all things necessary for you, both now in this kind of life, and better things in that life which is eternal. “But in every prayer and supplication, with good grace, let your requests be made known before God.” So that every action of a Christian now faithful, good, and perfect, all anxieties set aside (for this is renunciation), may be free for prayers and supplication. Prayers are to ask the Lord; supplication is also to speak when you ask: for this is supplication, prayers when … But what will that supplication be? Asking something, or nothing? What is it that one should ask who, already made faithful, asks God? What supplication or request will he have, since he has renounced all worldly things? He himself advised that we pray and make prayers “with good grace”; so that for all of us supplication in prayers may be thanksgiving, that we give thanks; because by the goodness of God we have obtained so great a gift. For this is what he says, “with good grace.” And he added “good” so that we would not do it unwillingly, but truly give thanks, and then he added “good thanks.” Since supplication in prayers can be about good grace, it can also be about a request. Above, having said “with good grace,” he added: “let your requests,” he says, “be made known before God.” … And let him ask that the heavenly things themselves which are promised be fulfilled. Whoever asks surely asks for such things as it is right for one already faithful to ask. For when we think of what is to be asked, which we wish to be made known before God, they are necessarily such as befit a faithful man who hopes also for heavenly and all divine things. These, he says, that is, your requests, let them be made known before God.
4.7PL 8:1229c–1230b
Et pax Dei quoe habet omnem intellectum, custodiat corda vestra. Hoc praemium erit si ita precemur, ita oremus, ut cum bona gratia oremus; et ita petitiones habeamus, ut innotescant penes Deum. Hoc ita est, erit, inquit, pax Dei quae custodiat corda vestra: quae pax Dei habet omnem intellectum. Vehementer et acute hoc positum: etenim cum pax Dei venerit in nos, Deum intelligemus: nihil dissonum, nihil discrepans, nihil per argumenta litigiosum, nihil quod recipiat quaestionem, ut nobis contingit in mundanis: sed ita aperta omnia sunt, cum pacem Dei habeamus uti omnis intellectus nobiscum sit: pacis enim est jam quiescere, jam securitatem habere. Quum Deus pacem committit cordibus nostris, jam omnis intellectus nobiscum est. Qui enim Deum intelligit, omnia intelligit: cum Deum intelligit, custodiuntur corda ejus qui intelligit. Item corpora vestra in Jesu Chri– sto. Ecce et hic significatio est de resurrectione: et hoc quoque praemium positum vel adnuntiatum his qui ita rogant, et ita precantur cum bona gratia, ut habeant Dei pacem, et corpora in Jesu Christo. Dixit enim de corde, de intellectu, quod custodientur cum pax data est: nunc de ipsis illis, id est de corpore de anima; corpora, inquit, vestra in Jesu Christo: in ipsius enim majestate et virtute corpora nostra sunt, quae cum ejus adventu resurgent, reviviscent, merita accipient: quae omnia erunt nobis integra, si illa praecepta servemus, in Christo unum sentientes, gaudentes, modesti, nihil sollicitudinis habentes; in omni precatione et oratione, cum bona gratia, petitiones nostras penes Deum notas facientes.
“And the peace of God, which holds all understanding, keep your hearts.” This will be the reward if we pray so, make supplication so, that we pray with good grace; and have our requests so that they are made known before God. If this is so, there will be, he says, the peace of God, which will keep your hearts: which peace of God holds all understanding. This is set down forcefully and keenly: for when the peace of God has come into us, we shall understand God: nothing dissonant, nothing discordant, nothing contentious through arguments, nothing that admits a question, as happens to us in worldly things; but all things are so open when we have the peace of God that all understanding is with us: for it belongs to peace now to rest, now to have security. When God entrusts peace to our hearts, all understanding is now with us. For whoever understands God understands all things: when he understands God, the hearts of him who understands are kept. “Likewise your bodies in Jesus Christ.” See, here too there is a reference to the resurrection: and this too is a reward set down or announced to those who ask so, and pray so with good grace, that they may have the peace of God, and their bodies in Jesus Christ. For he spoke of the heart, of the understanding, that they will be kept when peace is given: now of those themselves, that is, of the body, of the soul; “your bodies,” he says, “in Jesus Christ”: for in his majesty and power are our bodies, which at his coming will rise, live again, receive their deserts: all which will be whole for us if we keep those precepts, thinking one thing in Christ, rejoicing, moderate, having no anxiety, in every prayer and supplication with good grace making our requests known before God.
4.8PL 8:1230b–1231b
De coetero, fratres, quoecumque justa, quoecumque sancta, quoecumque amabilia, quoecumque bonoe famoe, si qua virtus, si qua laus, hoec cogitate; quoe et didicistis,et accepistis, et audistis etiam in me; hoec agite, et Deus pacis erit vobiscum. Docuit preces quales habeamus, id est cum bona gratia item quemadmodum petitiones: deinde quae pax, id est quod beneficium a Deo nobis detur; sic agendum, et rogandum ut custodiatur intellectus noster et corda nostra, et sint omnia corpora nostra in Christo Jesu. Haec cum ita sint, de caetero, inquit, fratres, haec cogitate. Quid est de caetero? postquam correcti estis, sublata jam omni discordia et errato, quoniam unum sentitis; de caetero sic sentite: quaecumque sint vera, haec accipiatis et cogitetis. Quae autem illa vera sunt? quae in evangelio ponuntur, Christus Jesus Dei Filius, et caetera quae saepe diximus. Cum autem vera cogitatis, sequuntur ut casta sint: non enim corrumpitur quod verum est: hoc enim castum est: quod non corrumpitur, verum est. Deinde quae vere casta sunt, haec et justa sunt:justificantur enim sanctificatione a Deo. Omnia quae justa, quae casta, quae vera sunt, quae sancta sunt jam et amabilia, jam et bonae famae. Quis enim sanctum non amet? quis non bene de eo loquatur ac sentiat? Haec ergo, inquit, cogitate quae ad bonam pertineant famam: utique amabilia sint, et habeant charitatem, neque habeant discordiam. Omne enim amabile. concordiam habet: item quae bonae famae sunt, non habent invidiam et in concordia sunt. Ex quibus omnibus superiora ad ipsam veram virtutem pertinent, posteriora ad fructum virtutis. Nam virtutis est amare vera, casta, justa, sancta, Fructus virtutis amabilia et bonae famae. Idcirco duo ista posuit quae subjunxit: si qua virtus, si qua laus. Vim rerum diligenter attendit. Etenim cum gratia Dei fiant omnia; ipse enim per spiritum suum missum in nos et gubernat et regit, ut nihil in nobis sit; ita ait, si qua virtus. Et rursus si virtus, quae in nobis est, non ex nobis est, sed ex Deo, ne laus quidem nostra: et idcirco, si qua laus. Verumtamen quoniam videtur vel virtus nostra, vel laus; unde dixit ibi, hoec, inquit, omnia cogitate. Utique quae illa sunt? quae didicistis, me scilicet docente, et accepistis, et audistis, et vidistis in me. Perfectum primo posuit, didicistis. Unde autem didicistis? Causae subjunctae, accepistis. Rursusque ipsum accipere unde audistis et vidistis? ex me vidistis in me: ut non monitor solum Paulus sit, sed etiam praebeat exemplum quemadmodum vera sequantur, quemadmodum casta, quemadmodum reliqua. Haec, inquit, agite. Supra dixit, hoec cogitate; nunc adjicit, hoec agite; ut non solum ex cogitatione sint ista bona, sed etiam in actu. Deinde adjunxit praemium sicuti supra, et Deus pacis erit vobiscum: quod maxime necessarium Phi– lippensibus praemium, ut nulla sit discordia, unum sentiant omnes, sit pax in eorum ecclesia: et Deus pacis qui est pater, et ejus Filius Jesus Dominus noster, omni animae in Deum conversae pacem praestans; hoc est quod ait pax vobiscum.
“For the rest, brothers, whatever is just, whatever holy, whatever lovable, whatever of good report, if there is any virtue, if any praise, think on these things; what you have both learned and received and heard also in me, do these things, and the God of peace will be with you.” He has taught what prayers we should have, that is, with good grace, and likewise what requests: then what peace, that is, what benefit is given us by God; that we must act and ask so that our understanding and our hearts may be kept, and all our bodies may be in Christ Jesus. Since these things are so, “for the rest,” he says, “brothers, think on these things.” What is “for the rest”? After you have been corrected, all discord and error now removed, since you think one thing: for the rest think so: whatever things are true, accept and think on these. And what are those true things? What is set down in the gospel, Christ Jesus the Son of God, and the rest we have often said. And when you think true things, it follows that they are chaste: for what is true is not corrupted: for this is chaste: what is not corrupted is true. Then what is truly chaste is also just: for they are justified by sanctification from God. All things that are just, that are chaste, that are true, that are holy, are now also lovable, now also of good report. For who would not love what is holy? Who would not speak and think well of it? These things, then, he says, think on, which pertain to good report: surely they are lovable and have love, and have no discord. For everything lovable has concord: likewise what is of good report has no envy and is in concord. Of all these, the earlier pertain to true virtue itself, the later to the fruit of virtue. For it is of virtue to love the true, the chaste, the just, the holy; the fruit of virtue is the lovable and of good report. Therefore he set down those two which he added: “if there is any virtue, if any praise.” He attended carefully to the force of things. For since all things come about by the grace of God—for he himself, through his Spirit sent into us, both governs and rules, so that nothing in us is ours—so he says, “if there is any virtue.” And again, if the virtue which is in us is not from us but from God, neither is the praise ours: and therefore, “if any praise.” Yet since the virtue or the praise seems to be ours, from there he said: “think,” he says, “on all these things.” What are they, surely? “What you have learned,” namely with me teaching, “and received, and heard, and seen in me.” He put the perfect first, “you have learned.” And from where have you learned? The causes are added: “you have received.” And again, this receiving, from where have you heard and seen? From me, you have seen in me: so that Paul is not only an admonisher but also gives an example of how they should follow the true, how the chaste, how the rest. “These things,” he says, “do.” Above he said, “think on these things”; now he adds, “do these things”; so that these good things may be not only in thought but also in act. Then he added the reward, as above: “and the God of peace will be with you”: a reward most necessary for the Philippians, that there be no discord, that all think one thing, that there be peace in their church: and the God of peace, who is the Father, and his Son Jesus our Lord, giving peace to every soul turned to God; this is what he says, “peace be with you.”
4.10PL 8:1231b–1231c
Gratulatus sum autem vehementer in Domino quod tandem aliquando refloruistis, ut et pro me sapiatis in quo et ante sapiebatis. Ut in errorem lapsi Philippenses fuerant docti in Evangelio ab apostolo Paulo; nunc admoniti, reversi sunt in pristinam intelligentiam ut credant in Evangelio quemadmodum adnuntiatur. Et refloruistis, inquit; id est ad florem reversi estis: ideo in Domino gratulatus sum, et vehementer gratulatus: et hoc est quod ait, ut pro me sapiatis: id est ut ego quemadmodum vos docui, sapiatis; coeperant enim aliter sapere. Quod autem ait, ut pro me sapiatis, quia intelligentia vestra et sapientia quae fuerat una pro me non erat: nunc autem cum sapitis quemadmodum docui, et Evangelium tradidi, pro me sapitis; id est prodesse mihi potest, quoniam vos docui. Et quid illud est, in quo et ante sapiebatis, nunc refloruistis et idem sapientes pro me jam sapitis?
“But I rejoiced greatly in the Lord that at last you have flourished again, so as to think on my behalf, in which you also thought before.” As the Philippians, taught in the gospel by the apostle Paul, had slipped into error, now, admonished, they have returned to their former understanding, so as to believe in the gospel as it is proclaimed. “And you have flourished again,” he says; that is, you have returned to flower: therefore I rejoiced in the Lord, and rejoiced greatly: and this is what he says, “so as to think on my behalf”: that is, that you think as I taught you; for they had begun to think otherwise. And as to his saying, “so as to think on my behalf”: because your understanding and wisdom, which had been one, was not on my behalf: but now when you think as I taught and handed on the gospel, you think on my behalf; that is, it can profit me, since I taught you. And what is that, “in which you also thought before,” now you have flourished again, and thinking the same you now think on my behalf?
4.11PL 8:1231c–1232b
Occupati autem eratis. Non propter penuriam dico. Si hic sensus superiori jungitur, quia dictum supra est, etiam pro me sapiatis, id est ut de me cogitetis, erit intellectus ut ea quae mihi sunt necessaria, mittatis; sed etiam misistis; et ideo dictum sit, gratulatus sum autem in Domino quod tandem aliquando refloruistis, et abundare coepit fructus ex operatione vestra. Sic enim postea dicit, et coepistis pro me sapere: in quo est et illud, in quo et ante sapiebatis, ut mihi necessaria mitteretis: et hoc est quod sequitur. Quo modo sapiebant? Ante occupati erant, ante in his operibus. Quod quidem Paulus, non ideo, inquit, dico propter penuriam. Non enim quod volo pro me sapiatis aut in quo et ante sapiebatis, et in quo occupati eratis ut mihi mitteretis, aut quod nunc volo ut mittatis, propter penuriam dico. Sic enim et postea ait, non quia exquiro abundantiam in oratione. Non ergo propter inopiam istud quaero, sed ut fructus sit abundans in oratione vestra, cum haec omnia pro me curatis et sapitis: ita est enim curam gerere; non quia egeo. Nam, et abundo, inquit; quippe sufficiens mihi sum: sic enim subjungit: Et ego enim didici, in quibus sum, sufficiens esse. Novi sensus hic est: novi, inquit, sufficiens esse, in quibus sum: didici enim ego ut contentus sim quae habeo; et in quibus sim mihi ipsi sufficiens: non enim ad sumptus tantum hoc referendum, sed curam et cogitationem et orationem exhibere debent pro Paulo: ut hoc sit ad omnia referendum; ut et pro me sapiatis, in quo et sapuistis. Generaliter ergo ut vel necessaria, vel ut oratio circa Philippensibus pro Paulo habeatur. Denique non ad fortunas tantum vel ad necessaria quaeque posuit etiam hoc:
“But you were occupied. I do not say it because of want.” If this thought is joined to the preceding, since it was said above, “so as to think also on my behalf,” that is, so that you think about me, the understanding will be that you send what is necessary for me; but you also sent; and so it was said, “but I rejoiced in the Lord that at last you have flourished again,” and the fruit has begun to abound from your working. For so he says afterward, “and you began to think on my behalf”: in which is also that, “in which you also thought before,” that you should send me necessities: and this is what follows. How did they think? Before, they were occupied, before in these works. Which indeed Paul, “not because,” he says, “I say it because of want.” For it is not that I want you to think on my behalf, or in what you thought before, and in which you were occupied, so as to send to me, or that I now want you to send, that I say it because of want. For so he says afterward, “not because I seek abundance in prayer.” So I do not seek this because of need, but so that the fruit may be abundant in your prayer, when you take care and think of all these things on my behalf: for this is to have care; not because I am in need. For “I also abound,” he says; since I am sufficient for myself: for so he adds: “For I have learned to be sufficient in the things in which I am.” This is a new thought: I know, he says, how to be sufficient in the things in which I am: for I have learned to be content with what I have; and to be sufficient to myself in the things in which I am: for this is not to be referred only to expenses, but they ought to show care and thought and prayer on behalf of Paul: so that this is to be referred to all things, “that you may also think on my behalf, in which you also thought.” In general, then, so that either necessities or prayer may be held by the Philippians on behalf of Paul. Then he set down this too, not only regarding fortunes or necessities:
4.12PL 8:1232b–1232c
Et humiliari novi et abundare: et de virtutibus, et humiliari novi et abundare in omnia, in eodem modo: id est praebere omnes virtutes Et in omnibus institutus sum. Id est ad omnia assuefactus, et ferre sitim, famem, frigus; et rursus in abundantia laetari. Sic et de virtutibus, et de laboribus, in omnibus, inquit, institutus sum; et satiari, et famem sustinere institutus sum, inquit, et copia satiari, et rursus famem sustinere. Item ipsa duo repetit, et abundare, et egere in omnibus possum. Dicendo in omnibus. non ad necessaria victus nostri diximus, sed ad omnia quae in actu sunt, labores virtutesque, referenda sunt ista. Ita se institutum dixit, ut possit et abundare et egere in omnibus. Novum est quod ait in omnibus egere possum: id est tolero cum in omnibus egeo, id est egens fuero.
“I know both how to be humbled and how to abound”: and of virtues, I know both how to be humbled and how to abound in all things, in the same way: that is, to show all virtues. “And in all things I have been instructed.” That is, accustomed to all things, both to bear thirst, hunger, cold; and again to be glad in abundance. So too of virtues and of labors: in all things, he says, I have been instructed; both to be filled and to bear hunger I have been instructed, he says, both to be filled with plenty and again to bear hunger. Likewise he repeats the same two: “both to abound and to be in need in all things I can.” By saying “in all things,” we do not refer these to the necessities of our living, but they are to be referred to all things that are in action, labors and virtues. So he said he had been instructed, so that he can both abound and be in need in all things. It is new what he says, “in all things I can be in need”: that is, I endure when I am in need in all things, that is, when I shall be needy.
4.13PL 8:1232c–1232d
Atque ut verum, et nihilominus ex disciplina dicat evangelica, adjungit, Per eum qui me confortat. Quod genus vitae semper et habendum et tenendum, ut et nos laboremus, et nostri instituti sit omnia ista gerere, complere, ferre, tolerare: ita tamen ut hoc credamus, quia nos ad omnia ista fortes Deus fecit. Cum enim dixerit, in omnibus egere possum, et famem sustinere, revocavit virtutem suam ad Deum: per eum qui me confortat, Ita et vos, et omnes qui in Deum fidem habent, credant certe quae sint, se posse fortes fieri, et in egestate, et in caeteris laboribus. Deus enim nunquam deest his qui eum diligunt, qui in eum fidem habent et spem.
And so that he may speak truly and nonetheless from the evangelical discipline, he adds: “Through him who strengthens me.” This kind of life must always be held and kept: that we too labor, and that it belong to our training to carry out, complete, bear, and endure all these things; yet so that we believe this, that God has made us strong for all these things. For when he said, “I can be in need in all things, and bear hunger,” he referred his strength back to God: “through him who strengthens me.” So you too, and all who have faith in God, should surely believe, whatever things there are, that they can be made strong both in need and in other labors. For God is never lacking to those who love him, who have faith and hope in him.
4.14PL 8:1232d–1233a
Sane bene fecistis quod tribulationi meoe communicastis. Id est participes fuistis vel subvenistis mihi in tribulatione ut est communicatio, pari modo jungi mysterio: qui autem compatitur cum altero, et subvenit alteri.
“Yet you did well in sharing in my tribulation.” That is, you were sharers or came to my aid in tribulation, as it is a sharing, to be joined in like manner to the mystery: and whoever suffers with another also comes to another’s aid.
4.15PL 8:1233a–1233b
Scitis autem etiam vos, Philippenses, quoniam per initia Evangelii cum a Macedonia profectus sum, nulla mihi ecclesia communicavit in ratione dati et accepti, nisi vos tantummodo. Hic aperte exposuit, ut supra dictum est; tribulationi meae communicastis, id est auxilium et praesidium dedistis, dando mihi necessaria. Denique hoc adjungit: solis, inquit, Philippenses; et vos quoque scitis, quoniam in prin– cipio evangelii, quando profectus sum in Macedoniam, per omnes ecclesias evangelizavi; sed nulla mihi, inquit, communicavit. Ubi autem communicavit? in ratione, inquit, dati et accepti: id est in sumptibus, quod est datum et acceptum: nam qui dat, habet rationem cum eo qui accipit: et qui accipit, habet rationem cum eo qui dat, quantum dedit, quantumque accepit ille qui accepit. Non quo et ipse dederit aliquid, qui accepit; sed cum munus dat, ratio dati est et accepti. Quid enim est in quo Paulus de pecunia daret? Sed quoniam ratio dati et accepti est in pecunia inter eos qui dant et eos qui accipiunt, ideo sic junctum. Non enim pecunia accipitur pro evangelio, ut ratio dati sit in pecunia; at longe aliter.
“And you also know, Philippians, that in the beginnings of the gospel, when I set out from Macedonia, no church shared with me in the account of giving and receiving except you only.” Here he has explained openly, as was said above, “you shared in my tribulation,” that is, you gave help and support by giving me necessities. Then he adds this: you Philippians alone, he says; and you too know that at the beginning of the gospel, when I set out into Macedonia, I preached the gospel through all the churches; but none, he says, shared with me. And in what did it share? “In the account,” he says, “of giving and receiving”: that is, in expenses, which is what is given and received: for one who gives has an account with him who receives; and one who receives has an account with him who gives, how much he gave and how much the receiver received. Not that the one who received also gave something; but when one gives a gift, there is an account of giving and receiving. For what is there in which Paul would give money? But since the account of giving and receiving lies in money between those who give and those who receive, therefore it is joined so. For money is not received for the gospel, as though the account of giving were in money; far otherwise.
4.16PL 8:1233b–1233c
Vos, inquit, tantummodo communicastis. Denique subjungit illos dedisse: Propterea quod in Thessalonicam semel et bis misistis ea quoe mihi necessaria fuerant. Apertissime declaravit quid sit quod communicavistis et quomodo ratio sit dati et accepti. Vos. inquit, tantummodo in Thessalonicam semel et bis misistis ea quoe, mihi necessaria fuerunt.
“You only,” he says, “shared.” Then he adds that they gave: “Because to Thessalonica you sent once and twice what was necessary for me.” He has declared most openly what it is that you shared and how there is an account of giving and receiving. You, he says, only, to Thessalonica, once and twice sent what was necessary for me.
4.17PL 8:1233c
Non quia requiro datum; sed exquiro fructum abundantem in oratione vestra. Non egeo, inquit, neque ista necessaria exquiro. sed tantum benevolentiae vos usum habere debetis, ut mihi fructus vestrae benevolentiae sit, quod in benevolentia abundatis; id est ut cum orationem de vobis habeo, sit mihi fructus benevolentiae vestrae. Cum vel Deum pro vobis rogo, vel Deo pro vobis gratias ago, est mihi fructus circa orationem, quae pro vobis est, dum abundare vos intelligo et esse benevolos.
“Not because I seek the gift; but I seek abundant fruit in your prayer.” I am not in need, he says, nor do I seek these necessities; but you ought to have so much practice of goodwill that there may be for me the fruit of your goodwill, that you abound in goodwill; that is, that when I have prayer concerning you, there may be for me the fruit of your goodwill. When I either ask God for you or give thanks to God for you, there is for me fruit concerning the prayer that is for you, when I understand that you abound and are benevolent.
4.18PL 8:1233c–1234a
Habeo enim omnia et abundo. Ideo, inquit, non requiro datum; nam omnia habeo: et multi habent omnia, sed non abundant: vere enim possumus adhuc velle si non abundemus, sed habeamus. Qui abundat, et habet et plusquam necesse est habet. Supra enim dixit, quoe mihi necessaria fuerunt misistis; nunc: Haec, inquit, ego habeo et abundo. Denique persequitur ut ostendat abundantiam: Repletus sum cum accepi quoe per Epaphroditum misistis. Ne illud quod abundat alienum sit, dicit et ipsorum esse quia miserunt: Repletus sum, inquit, cum accepi ea quoe per Epaphroditum misistis, odorem suavitatis, sacrificium acceptum, sanctum, gratum Deo. Si supra nihil aliud de eo quod datur expetere se dixit nisi fructum abundantem, ita et hic cum repletum se dicit, et accepisse quae missa sunt, non in his quae missa sunt gaudeo et repletus sum; sed in eo quod habuistis voluntatem curamque mittendi; quae est benevolentia, et fructus abundantiae; unde odor mihi suavitatis est, vos tales esse; et sacrificium sanctum, gratum Deo, libenter facere quae facias; curam gerere, praestare quod praestandum est alteri ad necessitates: hoc est ipsum sacrificium et sanctum et acceptum et gratum Deo, ipsa benevolentia.
“For I have all things and abound.” Therefore, he says, I do not seek the gift; for I have all things: and many have all things but do not abound: for truly we can still want if we do not abound, but only have. One who abounds both has and has more than is necessary. For above he said, “you sent what was necessary for me”; now: these, he says, I have and abound. Then he goes on to show the abundance: “I am filled, having received what you sent by Epaphroditus.” So that what abounds would not be foreign, he says it is theirs too, because they sent it: “I am filled,” he says, “having received what you sent by Epaphroditus, an odor of sweetness, an acceptable sacrifice, holy, pleasing to God.” If above he said he sought nothing else from what is given but abundant fruit, so here too, when he says he is filled and has received what was sent, I do not rejoice and am not filled in the things that were sent; but in this, that you had the will and care to send; which is goodwill, and the fruit of abundance; hence it is an odor of sweetness to me that you are such; and a holy sacrifice, pleasing to God, to do willingly what you do; to take care, to provide what must be provided to another for his needs: this is itself the sacrifice, both holy and acceptable and pleasing to God, goodwill itself.
4.19PL 8:1234a–1234c
Deus autem meus impleat omne desiderium vestrum secundum divitias suas in gloria in Christo Jesu. Deo autem et patri nostro gloria in soecula saeculorum. Quoniam et rectos opera ipsa, et bonos ex voluntate quod libenter mittant et curam gerant sacrificium esse hoc optimum Deo dixit et odorem suavitatis. Jam ad referendam gratiam optat, votum facit, ut Deus (sed apostoli sit Deus), Deus, inquit, meus; ne commune sit cum caeteris; impleat omne, inquit, desiderium vestrum, et impleat secundum divitias suas. Id est cum vos non expetieritis quae mundi sunt, sed ea quae Deus de divitiis suis largitur et dat, id est quae coelestia sunt, quae divina; ipsae sunt enim divitiae Dei. Denique adjunxit, gloria in Christo Jesu, ut hae sint divitiae, quae sunt in Christo Jesu, id est vita aeterna, sanctificatio. Adjunxit autem, quod cum religione semper adjungitur, et devotione et obsequio: Deo, inquit, gloria, Deo patri; et Deo, inquit, nostro, scilicet Jesu Christo patri nostro: sit illi gloria aeterna, quod est in soecula soeculorum. Finit epistola. Inde monitis praeceptis quae ad recte vivendum, sequuntur salutationes. Primo salutat ipse, vel salutari suo nomine alteros mandat. Quos tamen alteros?
“But may my God fulfill every desire of yours according to his riches in glory in Christ Jesus. But to God and our Father be glory to the ages of ages.” Since he said that they are both upright in their very works and good in will, in that they send willingly and take care, and that this is the best sacrifice to God and an odor of sweetness, now, to return thanks, he wishes and makes a vow that God (but let it be the apostle’s God), “my God,” he says, so that it is not common with the others, “may fulfill,” he says, “every desire of yours,” and fulfill it “according to his riches.” That is, when you have sought not the things of the world, but those which God bestows and gives from his riches, that is, things heavenly, things divine; for these are the riches of God. Then he added, “in glory in Christ Jesus,” so that these may be the riches which are in Christ Jesus, that is, eternal life, sanctification. And he added what is always added with reverence and devotion and obedience: “to God,” he says, “be glory,” to God the Father; and “to our God,” he says, namely Jesus Christ, our Father: may eternal glory be to him, that is, “to the ages of ages.” The letter ends. Then, after the admonitions and precepts for living rightly, greetings follow. First he greets himself, or bids others to be greeted in his name. And which others?
4.21PL 8:1234c–1235a
Salutate omnes sanctos in Christo Jesu. Sanctos in Christo Jesu, an in Christo Jesu salutate? Salutant vos qui mecum sunt fratres. Non, inquit, solus saluto vel mando ut salutetis, sed salutant vos et fratres. Adjecit qui mecum sunt. Hoc de plebe et de omni Christiano, qui secum sit, accipi voluit. Denique aliud: salutant vos universi sancti, quos utique accepta fide sanctificavit: proecipue autem qui sunt ex Coesaris domo: ipsi vos praecipue salutant, qui sunt de domo Caesaris. Et virtutem evangelii ostendit, quod de domo Caesaris crediderunt multi: qui utique erecti esse debuerant, et nihil aliud quam de Caesare cogitare: et rursus humilitatem ipsorum, qui et humiles sint et hospitales, et omnes fratres salutent alibi positos. Quod autem dixit proecipue intelligi licet illos operam dare ut placeant in obsequio, et idcirco extra caeteros dixerit quod ipsi salutant.
“Greet all the saints in Christ Jesus.” “The saints in Christ Jesus,” or “greet in Christ Jesus”? “The brothers who are with me greet you.” Not only I, he says, greet you or bid you greet, but the brothers too greet you. He added, “who are with me.” He wanted this to be taken of the people and of every Christian who was with him. Then another: “all the saints greet you,” whom surely, the faith having been received, he sanctified: “but especially those who are of Caesar’s household”: they especially greet you, who are of Caesar’s household. And he shows the power of the gospel, that many from Caesar’s household believed, who surely should have been proud and thought of nothing but Caesar; and again their humility, that they are both humble and hospitable, and greet all the brothers placed elsewhere. And as to his saying “especially,” it may be understood that they took pains to please in service, and therefore he said, apart from the rest, that they greet.
4.23PL 8:1235a–1236a
Gratia Domini nostri Jesu Christi cum spiritu vestro. Qui ita sensit de Philippensibus ut illos non quomodo in caeteris epistolis rectum sentire, neque a pseudoapostolis seductos esse accepit, sed tantum exhortativa epistola scripta et in prece. Gratia, inquit, Domini nostri Jesu Christi cum spiritu vestro. Si enim spiritus inest, recte sentiunt. Quid ergo preces agunt apostoli? Ut gratia Domini Jesu Christi sit cum spiritu illorum in Christo Jesu. Amen.
“The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with your spirit.” He thought of the Philippians in such a way that he did not take them, as in the other letters, as not thinking rightly, nor as led astray by false apostles, but only wrote a letter of exhortation, and ended with a prayer. “The grace,” he says, “of our Lord Jesus Christ be with your spirit.” For if the spirit is within, they think rightly. What, then, do the prayers of the apostle do? That the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ may be with their spirit in Christ Jesus. Amen.