Prescription against Heretics 7

Summary: Heresies draw their questions and doctrines from philosophy; Athens has nothing to do with Jerusalem, and after Christ and the gospel no further inquiry is needed.

Show

Latin text · Oehler 2:8–10

Hae sunt doctrinae hominum et daemoniorum, prurientibus auribus natae de ingenio sapientiae saecularis, quam dominus stultitiam vocans stulta mundi in confusionem etiam philosophiae ipsius elegit. Ea est enim materia sapientiae saecularis, temeraria interpres divinae naturae et dispositionis. Ipsae denique haereses a philosophia subornantur. Inde aeones, et formae nescio quae infinitae, et trinitas hominis apud Valentinum; Platonicus fuerat: inde Marcionis deus melior de tranquillitate; a Stoicis venerat: et ut anima interire dicatur, ab Epicureis observatur: et ut carnis restitutio negetur, de una omnium philosophorum schola sumitur: et ubi materia cum deo aequatur, Zenonis disciplina est: et ubi aliquid de igneo deo allegatur, Heracletus intervenit. Eadem materia apud haereticos et philosophos volutatur, idem retractatus implicantur: unde malum, et quare? et unde homo, et quomodo? et, quod proxime Valentinus proposuit, unde deus? scilicet de enthymesi et ectromate. Miserum Aristotelem! qui illis dialecticam instituit, artificem struendi et destruendi, versipellem in sententiis, coactam in coniecturis, duram in argumentis, operariam contentionum, molestam etiam sibi ipsi, omnia retractantem, ne quid omnino tractaverit. Hinc illae fabulae et genealogiae interminabiles, et quaestiones infructuosae, et sermones serpentes velut cancer, a quibus nos apostolus refrenans nominatim philosophiam contestatur caveri oportere, scribens ad Colossenses, Videte, ne qui sit circumveniens vos per philosophiam et inanem seductionem, secundum traditionem hominum, praeter providentiam spiritus sancti. Fuerat Athenis, et istam sapientiam humanam, affectatricem et interpolatricem veritatis, de congressibus noverat, ipsam quoque in suas haereses multipartitam varietate sectarum invicem repugnantium. Quid ergo Athenis et Hierosolymis? quid academiae et ecclesiae? quid haereticis et Christianis? Nostra institutio de porticu Solomonis est, qui et ipse tradiderat dominum in simplicitate cordis esse quaerendum. Viderint qui Stoicum et Platonicum et dialecticum Christianismum protulerunt. Nobis curiositate opus non est post Christum Iesum, nec inquisitione post evangelium. Cum credimus, nihil desideramus ultra credere. Hoc enim prius credimus, non esse quod ultra credere debeamus.

English · Claude translation

These are the doctrines of men and of demons, born for itching ears from the cleverness of worldly wisdom, which the Lord called foolishness, choosing the foolish things of the world to confound even philosophy itself. For this is the stuff of worldly wisdom, a rash interpreter of the divine nature and arrangement. In short, heresies themselves are equipped by philosophy. From there come the aeons, and I know not what infinite forms, and the trinity of man in Valentinus: he had been a Platonist. From there comes Marcion's better god, praised for his tranquillity: he had come from the Stoics. And when the soul is said to perish, the Epicureans are followed; and when the restoration of the flesh is denied, it is taken from the single school of all the philosophers; and where matter is made equal with God, it is the teaching of Zeno; and where something is alleged about a fiery god, Heraclitus comes in. The same subject matter is turned over among heretics and philosophers; the same inquiries are entangled: Whence is evil, and why? And whence is man, and how? And, what Valentinus lately proposed: Whence is God? From “enthymesis” and “ectroma,” no doubt! Wretched Aristotle, who devised dialectic for them, an art of building up and pulling down, shifty in its propositions, forced in its conjectures, harsh in its arguments, a laborer of contentions, troublesome even to itself, reconsidering everything so as never to have treated anything at all. Hence those fables and endless genealogies and fruitless questions and words that creep like a cancer, from which the apostle, restraining us, testifies by name that philosophy must be guarded against, writing to the Colossians, “See that no one circumvents you through philosophy and empty seduction, according to the tradition of men,” beside the providence of the Holy Spirit. He had been at Athens and had come to know from his encounters this human wisdom, which apes and corrupts the truth, itself divided into many parts by the variety of its mutually hostile sects. What then has Athens to do with Jerusalem? What has the Academy to do with the church? What have heretics to do with Christians? Our instruction comes from the porch of Solomon, who had himself taught that the Lord must be sought in simplicity of heart. Let those see to it who have brought forth a Stoic and Platonic and dialectical Christianity. We have no need of curiosity after Christ Jesus, nor of inquiry after the gospel. When we believe, we desire nothing further to believe. For this we believe first: that there is nothing further that we ought to believe.

About this passage

Source
Oehler 2:8–10 · Franz Oehler, ed., Quinti Septimii Florentis Tertulliani quae supersunt omnia, vol. 2 (Leipzig: T. O. Weigel, 1854), 3–46 · Latin text: Franz Oehler (Oehler 2), digitized by the Perseus Digital Library (canonical-latinLit), CC BY-SA 4.0
Text
As printed in Oehler 2. Manuscript variants and the editor's apparatus are not reproduced; no textual problem is noted in this passage.
Translation
Claude translation (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27 · Translated by Claude from the Latin text of Oehler, vol. 2 (1854); made independently of existing English translations.
Compare
Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 3 (1885) (an older public-domain English translation, whole volume at CCEL; checked against ours only after ours was made)
Scripture
Extrabiblical texts
  • Wis 1:1 (Wisdom of Solomon) · allusion, high confidence
Topics
Heresy, Scripture and canon

Notes

Translation notes

  • The allusions are 1 Tim 4:1, 2 Tim 4:3, 1 Cor 1:20-27 and 3:18-19, 1 Tim 1:4, 2 Tim 2:17, Col 2:8, Acts 17 (Paul at Athens), Acts 3:11 and 5:12 (Solomon's porch), and Wis 1:1. The text of Col 2:8 ends at “men”; “praeter providentiam spiritus sancti” is Tertullian's own gloss, rendered “beside the providence of the Holy Spirit,” an unusual phrase. “Enthymesis” (thought) and “ectroma” (miscarriage) are terms of the Valentinian myth of Sophia. The digital text's “Hac” and “sapientise” are read as “Hae” and “sapientiae.”

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (letter misread in the digital text): Hac sunt doctrinae → Hae sunt doctrinae; sapientise → sapientiae.

Cite this passage

Tertullian, Praescr. 7 (trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/tertullian-praescriptione/7/).

Plain text
Tertullian, Praescr. 7 (trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/tertullian-praescriptione/7/).

Download citation:BibTeX ·RIS (Zotero, EndNote)

Whole work:BibTeX ·RIS ·Markdown text

Report an error in this passage