Commentary on Hosea, Joel and Amos 1.5.1–1.6.6
Authorship disputed: Printed in Migne's PL 21 among the works of Rufinus, under the title Commentarius in Osee, Joel, Amos. Modern scholarship (Germain Morin, 1913-14; later editors of CCSL 88) assigns the three commentaries to Julian of Eclanum; the manuscripts do not name him.
Latin text: Migne, PL 21 (Latin text: Migne, Patrologia Latina, vol. 21, digitized by Open Greek and Latin (patrologia_latina-dev, University of Leipzig), CC BY-SA 4.0).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0).
Joel 1, chapter 5
1.5.1PL 21:989a–990a
Vers. 1. 2. — Audite hoc, inquit, sacerdotes, et attendi e, domus Israel, et domus regis, auscultate, quia vobis judicium est. Universa nempe ad sacrilegia vaditis, nec aliquod in peccando discrimen, quale habebatis in ord nibus, praestitistis. Nunc ergo, vel sacerdotati, vel regali dignitate sublimes, et tota Israelis turba, quoniam jam impendi(??) exitium, convenit ut intelligatis, vos non pro v(??)ribus, sed pro aequitate judicis disperire. Duas siquidem res, quae. viderentur esse contrariae, perpetrastis, ut fieretis videlicet, laqueus et rete sed ita in montis vertice, ac si in loco speculae, eminentis extentum. Hostias vero quas cadorum praesuli deceret offerri, et quasi vehente fumo ad superna portari, has vos, ordine commutato, in profundo mersistis. Illud autem est, quod in sacerdotibus et regibus accuso, quia cum eum locum essent in gente sortiti, ut agerent non minus honestate ac religione, quam potestate ac dignitate reve endi, atque ad id, quod rectum erat, tam sermone, quam exemplo debuerint subditos incitare, illi contra, vel conciliationem criminibus praebuere, vel formam: idque solum de fastigio priore retinentes, ut procul que fecerant apparerent, laqueos et retia, tetenderunt, quibus infoelix turba caperetur, eademque perversita e, sacrificia, inquit, in profundum, idest, quasi ad inferna, veristis. Quidve, cum ea aut daemonibus mactaretis, aut Manibus? Quia ergo peccandi amore, agendi ordinem confudistis, ita ut quidam in vobis ambitus appareret, discernendi ignorantia, quid sequatur, accipite. Ego eruditor ero omnium vestrum, ut docente ultione, discatis, quod spreta eruditione, nescistis. [Vers. 3.] Ego scio Effraim, et Israel non est absconditus a me, quia nunc fornicatus est Effraim, contaminatus est Israel: non dabunt cogitationes suas, ut revertantur ad Dominum Deum suum, quia spiritus fornicationis in medio eorum, et Dominum non cognoverunt, Quanta, inquit, obstinatione deliquerit Israel, nemo magis novit, quam ego, qui peccatorum isteriora conspicio. Neque est viscerum ulla pars, quae meum suffugere possit obtutum. Totum eum ergo diligenter inspiciens, cognovi, quia nunc sit penitus fornicatus, penitusque pollutus. Quod ne in excusatione praeteritorum peccatorum dictum putares, quid tali affirmatu indicatum vellet, subjecto statim sermone patefecit. Ait enim; [Vers. 4.] Non dabunt cogitationes suas, ut revertantur ad Dominum Deum suum, quia spiritus fornicationis in medio eorum est, et Deum non cognoverunt. Ergo, post susceptionem peccati, dissimulata compunctio, et recepta in pectus, non solum usurpatio criminis, verum etiam emendationis oblivio, ita praecedentibus erroribus antefertur, ut haec sola iniquitas, vel prima, vel maxima censeatur. Non dabunt, inquit, cogitationes suas, ut revertamur ad Dominum Deum suum, quia spiritus fornicationis in medio eorum. Caussam, cur nihil de emendatione cogitarent, hanc esse monstravit, quod immundus spiritus ipse daemon, vel sacrilegiorum amor in eorum medio versaretur. Si enim ex intervallo delinquerent, appropriare eis immundus spiritus crederetur. Nunc amem, cum omne vitae tempus sceleribus impendant, rite sacrilegiorum auctor (??)e juaqnam vicinus eorum dicitur esse, sed medius. Illo ergo pectoribus eorum insidente, de emendatione nihil cogitant, et ideo subduntur exitiis.
Verses 1, 2. — “Hear this,” he says, “O priests, and attend, O house of Israel, and listen, O house of the king, for the judgment is for you.” “All of you indeed go to sacrileges, and in sinning you have shown none of the distinction that you had in your ranks. Now, then, you who are exalted by priestly or royal dignity, and the whole crowd of Israel, since destruction now hangs over you, it is fitting that you understand that you perish not by the strength [of your enemies] but by the equity of the judge. For you have committed two things that would seem contrary: you became a snare and a net, but stretched out on the top of a mountain as if in the place of a high watchtower; while the sacrifices that ought to be offered to the Ruler of the heavens and carried upward, as it were, by the rising smoke, you, reversing the order, plunged into the depths. This is what I accuse in the priests and kings: although they had obtained such a place in the nation that they should be revered no less for honor and religion than for power and dignity, and ought to have urged their subjects to what was right by word as well as by example, they on the contrary furnished both encouragement and a pattern for crimes. Retaining from their former eminence only this, that what they had done appeared from afar, they stretched snares and nets in which the unhappy crowd might be caught; and with the same perversity, he says, you turned sacrifices into the depths, that is, toward the underworld, as it were. For what else was it, when you slaughtered them either to demons or to the shades of the dead? Since, then, out of love of sinning you confused the order of acting, so that a kind of ambition appeared in you together with ignorance of discernment, hear what follows: I will be the instructor of you all, so that, with vengeance teaching you, you may learn what you did not know when you despised instruction.” [Verse 3.] “I know Ephraim, and Israel is not hidden from me; for now Ephraim has committed sexual immorality, Israel is defiled. They will not direct their thoughts to return to the Lord their God, for the spirit of sexual immorality is in their midst, and they have not known the Lord.” “With what obstinacy Israel has sinned,” he says, “no one knows better than I, who see the inmost parts of sins. Nor is there any part of the heart that can escape my gaze. Examining him wholly and carefully, then, I have recognized that he has now committed sexual immorality thoroughly and been thoroughly polluted.” Lest you think this was said to excuse past sins, he at once made plain by the words that follow what he meant by this assertion. For he says [Verse 4]: “They will not direct their thoughts to return to the Lord their God, for the spirit of sexual immorality is in their midst, and they have not known God.” So compunction neglected after sin was committed, and, taken into the heart, not only the practice of crime but also forgetfulness of amendment, are set above the earlier errors, so that this iniquity alone is judged either the first or the greatest. “They will not direct their thoughts,” he says, “to return to the Lord their God, for the spirit of sexual immorality is in their midst.” He showed that the reason they gave no thought to amendment was that the unclean spirit, the demon himself, or the love of sacrileges, dwelt in their midst. If they sinned only now and then, the unclean spirit would be thought to come near them. But now, since they spend the whole time of their life in crimes, the author of sacrileges is rightly said to be not near them but in their midst. With him sitting in their hearts, they give no thought to amendment, and therefore they are handed over to destruction.
Hos 5:1–4 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Priests, people, and king are summoned to judgment for leading Israel into idolatry; their worst sin is that the ‘spirit of immorality’ in their midst keeps them from any thought of returning to God.
- The lemma is Hos 5:1–2; the comment also quotes 5:3–4.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (footnote letter and OCR slip in the digital text; footnote letter left in the digital text): est. a Uni ersa → est. Universa; ad b Dominum → ad Dominum.
Cite (SBL): Julian of Eclanum, Tract. proph. 1.5.1 (PL 21:989a–990a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/julian-eclanum-tractatus-prophetarum/1-5-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/julian-eclanum-tractatus-prophetarum/1-5-1
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-julian-eclanum-tractatus-prophetarum-1-5-1) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin as printed in Migne PL 21 (among Rufinus's works); no public-domain or FOTC English exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
1.5.2PL 21:990a–990b
Vers. 5. — Respondebit, Inquit, arrogantia Israel in facie ejus, et Israel, et Effraim ruent in iniquitate suat ruet etiam Judas cum eis. Ad similitudinem ruralium laboriosorum, quibus saepe respondet ubertas, et hos, ait, mercedem studiorum protinus recepturos. Digne, inquit, respondebit industria, id est ut sub calamitatibus erubescant, qui plurimum sibi de criminibus arrogabant.
Verse 5. — “The arrogance of Israel,” he says, “shall answer to his face, and Israel and Ephraim shall fall in their iniquity; Judah also shall fall with them.” Like farm laborers to whom a rich harvest often answers, these too, he says, will at once receive the wages of their pursuits. “Their industry,” he says, “will answer fittingly, so that those who claimed so much for themselves from their crimes will blush under calamities.”
Hos 5:5 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Israel’s arrogance will ‘answer’ it with the harvest of calamity, and Judah will fall with it.
Cite (SBL): Julian of Eclanum, Tract. proph. 1.5.2 (PL 21:990a–990b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/julian-eclanum-tractatus-prophetarum/1-5-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/julian-eclanum-tractatus-prophetarum/1-5-2
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-julian-eclanum-tractatus-prophetarum-1-5-2) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin as printed in Migne PL 21 (among Rufinus's works); no public-domain or FOTC English exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
1.5.3PL 21:990b–991a
Vers. 6. 7. — In gregibus suis et in armentis suis vadent ad quaerendum Dominum, et non inveniem: Ablatus est ab eis: In Domino praevaricati sunt, quaniam filios alienos genuerunt, nunc devorabit eos messis cum partubus suis. Cum dixisset supra, judicantis convenire justitiae, ut qui sceleribus se dedissent, stipendia quoque digna perferrent, Israeli sociavit et Judam, quem, licet paulo senus, in similem tamen reatum noverat esse venturum. Postquam vero justitiam commendavit examinis, ad temporum distinctionem revertitur, et Israel is facta persequitur, quem protinus sciebat esse periturum. Et primum quidem, cum dixisset Judam quoque Israeli in calamitate miscendum, subjecit, quod ad Judam magis respiceret, qui sacratum Deo Temi(??)lum tenebat. Nam licet pollueretur idolis, tamen etiam hostias offerebat Deo: cumque parum studeret moribus corrigendis, adquisiturum se arbitrabatur de assidua immolatione subsidium. Ergo, in gregibus, inquit, et in armentis suis vadent ad quoe rendum Dominum, et non invenient: ablatus est ab eis. Vadent autem posuit pro Ibant, per praeteriti siquidem temporis declinationem invectio loti detexitur. Superstitionis proinde magis quam religionis callo gradientes (sic enim hostiarum censetur oblatio, si eis defuerit cura virtutum) non potuerunt invenire Deum i lum, ad quem nemo nisi plenae devotionis calle deducitur. Ablatus est ab eis, non quod Deus potuerit auferri, sed quod ita nusquam eis occurreret ejus auxilium, ac si ab eis funditus videretur ablatus, Postea vero ad Effraim, idest, Samaritas vocem retorquens, aliam speciem praevaricationis exagitat, quae tamen vetustatem commissae impietatis ostendit. Quod ita, videlicet, legis statuta contemserint, ut profanis gentibus etiam per connubia miscerentur, studentes prorsus atque properantes, ut generis sui nomen exuerent, et quidvis aliud, quum Dei populus vocarentur. In Domino proevaricati sunt, quia filios alienos genuerunt. Tantum, inquit, odium mei nominis concepere, ut a minis eripi se posse vel a molestiis exui crederent, si in numerum aliarum gentium eorum suboles migravisset. Quamobrem nunc devorabit eos messis cuni portubus suis: Vicinam et impendentem calamitatem nomine messis ostendit: in quo tam germina quam fructus, uno pollicetur gladio demetendos.
Verses 6, 7. — “With their flocks and with their herds they will go to seek the Lord, and they will not find him: he has withdrawn from them. They have dealt faithlessly against the Lord, for they have begotten foreign children; now the harvest shall devour them with their portions.” Having said above that it befits the justice of a judge that those who had given themselves to crimes should also bear fitting wages, he joined Judah to Israel, knowing that Judah, though somewhat later, would come into similar guilt. After commending the justice of his assessment, he returns to the distinction of times and pursues the deeds of Israel, which he knew would soon perish. First, having said that Judah too would be mingled with Israel in calamity, he added what concerned Judah rather, which held the temple consecrated to God. For although it was polluted by idols, it also offered sacrifices to God; and though it took little care to correct its conduct, it thought it would gain help from constant sacrifice. “With their flocks,” he says, “and with their herds they will go to seek the Lord, and they will not find him: he has withdrawn from them.” He put “they will go” for “they went”; for the invective of the passage is uncovered by the inflection of the past tense. So walking on the path of superstition rather than of religion (for so the offering of sacrifices is judged, if care for virtues is lacking), they could not find that God to whom no one is led except by the path of full devotion. “He has withdrawn from them”: not that God could be taken away, but that his help nowhere met them, as if he seemed taken away from them altogether. Then, turning his voice to Ephraim, that is, the Samaritans, he attacks another kind of faithlessness, which nevertheless shows how old their ungodliness was: that they so despised the statutes of the law as to mix with profane nations even by marriages, eager and hastening to put off the name of their race and to be called anything rather than the people of God. “They have dealt faithlessly against the Lord, for they have begotten foreign children. They conceived such hatred of my name,” he says, “that they believed they could be rescued from threats or freed from troubles if their offspring passed into the number of other nations. Therefore now the harvest shall devour them with their portions.” By the name of harvest he shows the calamity near and hanging over them, in which he promises that both shoots and fruits are to be cut down by one sword.
Hos 5:6–7 (quotation, high confidence) · Deut 7:3 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Judah seeks God with sacrifices but without virtue and so does not find him; Ephraim’s mixed marriages with the nations show its long contempt for the law, and a ‘harvest’ of destruction will consume it.
- Julian understands “foreign children” as children born of marriages with Gentiles, contrary to the law.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (footnote letter left in the digital text): eos c messis → eos messis; in a quo tam → in quo tam.
Topics: Marriage
Cite (SBL): Julian of Eclanum, Tract. proph. 1.5.3 (PL 21:990b–991a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/julian-eclanum-tractatus-prophetarum/1-5-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/julian-eclanum-tractatus-prophetarum/1-5-3
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-julian-eclanum-tractatus-prophetarum-1-5-3) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin as printed in Migne PL 21 (among Rufinus's works); no public-domain or FOTC English exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
1.5.4PL 21:991a–991b
Vers. 8. 9. — Clangite buccina in Gabaa, et tuba in Bama, ululate in Bethavem, post tergum Benjamin. Effraim in desolatione erit, etc. Quia pronunciaverat, illos brevi tempore consumendos, pondusque sententiae in effectum alisque ulla dilatione gradientis, noverat: quasi jam rebus impletis, per eas urbes quae frequentissime erant, tubis clangentibus, et resonis planctibus jussit indicari quod totum Effraim vastitas occuparet. Omnia autem, quae dixit loca, idest, Tergum Benjamin, quae tribus fuit Judae regioni contermina, Gabaa et Rama et Bethaven, Judae finibus vicina fuisse colligimus. Cum igitur istorum calamitas, quae praecessit, illos solicitos debuerit facere, ipso nimirum timoris exemplo, non solum nihil ad emendationem promovit, sed etiam delinquendi praebuit incrementa, flue itaque vehementer exprobrat, et dicit, per id apparuisse pejores, per quod Geri debuerant vel pro ipsa humanitate meliores.
Verses 8, 9. — “Blow the horn in Gibeah, and the trumpet in Ramah; wail in Beth-aven, behind Benjamin. Ephraim shall be in desolation,” and so on. Because he had announced that they would be consumed in a short time, and knew that the weight of the sentence was advancing into effect without any delay, he commanded, as if the events were already fulfilled, that it be proclaimed through the most populous cities with blaring trumpets and resounding laments that devastation would seize all Ephraim. All the places he named, that is, “behind Benjamin,” which was a tribe bordering the region of Judah, and Gibeah, Ramah, and Beth-aven, we gather were near the borders of Judah. Since the calamity of these, which came first, ought to have made Judah anxious by the very example of fear, it not only did nothing toward amendment but even gave increase to sinning. He therefore rebukes it strongly, and says that it showed itself worse through the very thing by which it ought to have become better, if only out of humanity.
Hos 5:8–9 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The alarm is sounded in the border towns near Judah as Ephraim falls; Judah, instead of learning from it, sins the more.
Cite (SBL): Julian of Eclanum, Tract. proph. 1.5.4 (PL 21:991a–991b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/julian-eclanum-tractatus-prophetarum/1-5-4). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/julian-eclanum-tractatus-prophetarum/1-5-4
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-julian-eclanum-tractatus-prophetarum-1-5-4) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin as printed in Migne PL 21 (among Rufinus's works); no public-domain or FOTC English exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
1.5.5PL 21:991b–991c
Vers. 10. — Facti sunt enim principes Juda quasi assumentes terminum, super, eos effundam quasi aquam iram meam, Idest, tempore captivitatis Assyriae, quae tribus decem de finibus suis pepulit, Judae principes, quos fraterna calamitate in fletum oportuerat commoveri, ac decorem morum sedulo cogitare, ne et ipsi, videlicet, in similes aerumnas laberentur: non solum nihil formidinis compunctiouisve senserunt, sed parricidalem etiam animum publicarunt, addita sibi, videlicet, spatia terrarum, expulso fratre, gaudentes. In die ergo desolationis, idest, in tempore quo Tribus Israeliticae de suis finibus raigraverunt, ostendit fidem (subaudis) Judae: cujus latens votum detexit occasio. Atque ita in Levi habuit discrimina germanorum, ut ea sibi etiam commoda fuisse loqueretur: quod sane tanti reatus est, ut coegerit indignationem ulciscentis augeri. Sequitur enim. Super eum effundam, quasi aquam, iram meam: idest, postquam dixerat, effundam, aperte subdidit, quasi aquam. Deterior, inquit, Juda per exultationis istius crimen apparuit. Et ideo mergetur inundatione poenarum, quia cum inter caetera beneficia hoc quoque clementia nostra ei praestiterit, ut timori ejus emendationique Effraim impenderetur exitium: ille est eo abusus ad incrementa petulantiae, germanique sibi credidit non exempla provisa, sed praedia contribula.
Verse 10. — “For the princes of Judah have become like those who take the boundary; upon them I will pour out my wrath like water.” That is, at the time of the Assyrian captivity, which drove the ten tribes from their borders, the princes of Judah, who ought to have been moved to tears by their brothers’ calamity and to have thought earnestly about the beauty of good conduct, so as not to slip into similar hardships themselves, not only felt no fear or compunction but even showed a fratricidal spirit, rejoicing that stretches of land had been added to them now that their brother was expelled. “On the day of desolation,” then, that is, at the time when the tribes of Israel were removed from their borders, he showed the faith (understand: of Judah), whose hidden wish the occasion uncovered. And it held the disasters of its brothers so lightly as to speak of them as having even been to its advantage: which is certainly so great a guilt that it forced the indignation of the avenger to increase. For there follows: “Upon him I will pour out my wrath like water”: that is, after saying “I will pour out,” he openly added, “like water.” “Judah,” he says, “has shown itself worse by the crime of this exultation. And therefore it will be drowned by a flood of punishments, because, when among other benefits our mercy granted it this too, that Ephraim’s destruction should serve for its fear and amendment, it misused this to increase its insolence, and believed that its brother had been provided to it not as an example but as estates to be added to its own.”
Hos 5:10 (quotation, high confidence) · Hos 5:9 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Judah’s princes rejoiced at Israel’s exile and seized its land instead of repenting, so God will pour out his wrath on them like water.
- Julian reads “those who take the boundary” as Judah annexing the land left by the exiled tribes.
Cite (SBL): Julian of Eclanum, Tract. proph. 1.5.5 (PL 21:991b–991c; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/julian-eclanum-tractatus-prophetarum/1-5-5). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/julian-eclanum-tractatus-prophetarum/1-5-5
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-julian-eclanum-tractatus-prophetarum-1-5-5) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin as printed in Migne PL 21 (among Rufinus's works); no public-domain or FOTC English exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
1.5.6PL 21:991c–992c
Vers. 11. 15. — Calumniam patient Effraim, fractus judicio, quoniam coepit abire post sordem, Et ego quasi tinea Effraim, et quasi puti edo domui Judoe. Et tidit Effraim languorem suum, et Judas vinculum suum. Et abiit Effraim ad Assur, et misit ad regem altorem: et ipse non poterit sanare vos, nec solvere poterit a vobis vinculum. Quoniam ego quasi leoena Effraim, et quasi catulus leonis domui Juda, Ego, ego vadam, et capiam, et tollam, non et qui cruat. Vadens revertar ad locum meum, donec deficiatis, et quoeratis faciem meam. Graviter se Deus commendat offensum, quod nihil compunctionis de fraterna damnatione susceperit, sed remanens Judas, insultaverit exulanti, laetatus, Unes suos quacumque occidione proferri. Hoc ergo peccatum ita graviter Deus, ut non admoturum se iram promitteret, sed instar aquae penitus effusurum. Et quia per incrementa poenarum, nocentiorem fecerat Judum videri, quippe qui esset, inundante animad versione, populandus, assumtum colorem perrexit excolere. Aitque ita Judai esse graviorem reatum, ut ei comparatus Israel videatur calumniam pertulisse. Fitque sensus ejusmodi: Si meritorum ratio malum captivitatis exegit, cur Judas et gentium moribus inquinatus, et odio fratris infectus, vim distulit ultionis? Sin autem post tot crimina, necdum mereretur expelli, nonne ille qui captus est, per calumniam magis quam per justitiam docentis oppressus? Calumniam patiens Effraim, fractus judicio. Quid esset calumniam pati, curavit exponere, idest, judicis non aequitate, sed potestate deprimi. Ad eumdem autem sensum respicit, quod ait, Coepit abire post sordem. In superioribus enim et multitudinem et vetustatem peccatorum exprobraverat Israeli; ubi vero Judae crimen agitavit, videlicet, de fratris sui captivitate lucrum quaerentis et gaudium sentientis, idque censuit aliis praepunde(??)are criminibus: eodem etiam tenore subjecit reliqua, ut diceret, et circumventum in judicio fuisse Effraim, et ipsum principia, erroris habuisse. Ac si diceret: Tantam crudelitatem, Judas, animi tui publicasti, ut in sceleribus, pro quibus est damnatus Israel, tu horridior vetustiorque videaris. Unde et judicii mei, pro meritorum differentia, modus acuetur, ut Effraim. quasi tinea, interpolem: te vero, quasi inhaerens putredo, consumam. Notum est autem quanto minore, ea quae tinea mordet, quam quae putredo pervadit, exitio consumantur. Et vidit Effraim languorem suum, et Judas vinculum suum: id est, conspicietis, et perferetis uterque vindiciam, quae vestris studiis destinatur, nec vobis proderit auxilium a diversis regibus postulare: sed rebus fatebimini, illos vobis corruptionis exempla solum, non etiam salutis subsidia praestitisse. Et abiit Effraim ad Assur, et misit ad regem ultorem, et ipse non poterit sanare vos, nec solvere poterit a vobis vinculum. Quoniam ego quasi leoena Effraim, et quasi catulus leonis domui Juda, Utrique populo promisit se habitu leonis occursurum, sed vehementi mi, quam specie non fecerat, servavit in sexu, ut illi se, quasi leaenam, huic vero, quasi leonem diceret apparere. Implevit autem assumtam similitudinem dicendo. Ego, ego copiam, et vadam, et tollam, et non est qui eruat. Vadens revertar ad locum meum, donec deficiatis, et quoeratis faciem meam. Nemo est, inquit, pastorum qui pervasam a me praedam ausit eruere: sed despiciens rusticorum tumultum, exeram vires, donec indignationis meae esurus expleatur. Revertar autem ad locum meum, pro cubili posuit, ad quod leo non territus recipere se consuevit. Erit autem istud, donec vos aerumnis doloribusque lassati, meam, inquit, faciem requiratis: quod sane extra regulam susceptae de leone im aginis ex negotii veritate constat illatum. Caeterum, quantum ad comparationem respicit, quis eam faciem visere lassus optaret, cui nec validus potuisset obsistere? itaque cnm assumtam indignationem expressisset, per famem leonis, jam de personae suae majestate subjecit, se ad liberandum non esse venturum, nisi vultum ejus proficiens ipso attritu populus cuncupisset, et ab eo solo coepisset postulare remedium, a quo supplicium sensisset illatum.
Verses 11–15. — “Ephraim suffers false accusation, broken in judgment, because he began to go after filth. And I am like a moth to Ephraim, and like rottenness to the house of Judah. And Ephraim saw his sickness, and Judah his bond. And Ephraim went to Assyria, and sent to the avenging king; and he will not be able to heal you, nor will he be able to loose the bond from you. For I am like a lioness to Ephraim, and like a lion’s whelp to the house of Judah. I, I will go and take and carry off, and there is none to rescue. Going, I will return to my place, until you fail and seek my face.” God shows how gravely he was offended that Judah felt no compunction at its brother’s condemnation, but, remaining behind, insulted the exile, glad that its own borders were extended by whatever slaughter. God took this sin so gravely that he promised not merely to apply his wrath but to pour it out completely like water. And since by the increase of punishments he had made Judah appear the guiltier, as one to be laid waste by an overflowing punishment, he went on to develop the figure he had taken up. He says that Judah’s guilt is so much heavier that, compared with it, Israel seems to have suffered false accusation. The sense is this: “If the reckoning of deserts required the evil of captivity, why did Judah, defiled by the customs of the nations and infected with hatred of its brother, put off the force of vengeance? But if after so many crimes it still did not deserve to be expelled, was not the one who was taken captive crushed by false accusation rather than by the justice of the one who teaches?” “Ephraim suffers false accusation, broken in judgment.” He took care to explain what it is to suffer false accusation: to be crushed not by the equity of the judge but by his power. The words “he began to go after filth” look to the same sense. For above he had reproached Israel with the multitude and the age of its sins; but when he attacked the crime of Judah, which sought gain from its brother’s captivity and felt joy at it, and judged this to outweigh the other crimes, he added the rest in the same vein, saying that Ephraim had both been circumvented in judgment and had only [begun] the beginnings of error. As if he said: “You, Judah, have shown such cruelty of mind that in the crimes for which Israel was condemned you seem more horrible and of longer standing. So the measure of my judgment will be sharpened according to the difference of deserts: Ephraim I will eat away now and then like a moth, but you I will consume like clinging rottenness.” It is well known how much less destruction there is in what a moth gnaws than in what rot pervades. “And Ephraim saw his sickness, and Judah his bond”: that is, “You will both see and suffer the punishment appointed for your pursuits, and it will not help you to seek aid from various kings, but you will confess by events that they gave you only examples of corruption, not help toward safety. And Ephraim went to Assyria, and sent to the avenging king, and he will not be able to heal you, nor will he be able to loose the bond from you. For I am like a lioness to Ephraim, and like a lion’s whelp to the house of Judah.” He promised to meet both peoples in the guise of a lion, but kept in the sex the difference of severity that he had not made in the kind, so that he said he would appear to the one as a lioness, to the other as a lion. He completed the likeness he had taken up by saying: “I, I will seize and go and carry off, and there is none to rescue. Going, I will return to my place, until you fail and seek my face. There is none of the shepherds,” he says, “who will dare to snatch the prey I have seized; but scorning the uproar of the country folk I will put forth my strength until the hunger of my indignation is satisfied.” “I will return to my place” he put for the den to which a lion is accustomed to withdraw unafraid. “This will be,” he says, “until you, wearied by hardships and pains, seek my face”: which plainly goes beyond the rule of the image taken from the lion and is brought in from the truth of the matter. For as far as the comparison goes, who, when wearied, would wish to see that face which he could not resist even when strong? So, having expressed the indignation he had taken up through the hunger of the lion, he then added, concerning the majesty of his own person, that he would not come to deliver them unless the people, worn down by the very blows, desired to see his face and began to ask a remedy from him alone by whom they had felt the punishment inflicted.
Hos 5:11–15 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Judah’s glee at Israel’s fall makes its guilt so much greater that Israel seems wronged by comparison; God will strike both like a lion until, worn down, they seek his face.
- The lemma is Hos 5:11–15 (labeled “11. 15.” in the text). “Altorem” in the lemma is read “ultorem” (avenging), as later in the section. In “I, I will copiam” the text has “copiam” for “capiam” (seize).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (footnote letter left in the digital text): mereretur b expelli → mereretur expelli.
Cite (SBL): Julian of Eclanum, Tract. proph. 1.5.6 (PL 21:991c–992c; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/julian-eclanum-tractatus-prophetarum/1-5-6). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/julian-eclanum-tractatus-prophetarum/1-5-6
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-julian-eclanum-tractatus-prophetarum-1-5-6) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin as printed in Migne PL 21 (among Rufinus's works); no public-domain or FOTC English exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
Joel 1, chapter 6
1.6.1PL 21:992c–993c
Vers. 1.–3. — In tribulatione sua mane consurgent ad me. Venite, et revertamur ad Dominum, quia ipse capit, et sanabit nos: percutiet, et curabit nos. Vivificabit nos post duos dies, in die tertia suscitabit nos, et vivemus in conspectu ejus, et sciemus, sequemur que, ut cognoscamus Dominum: quasi diluculum proeparatus est egressus ejus, et teniet quasi imber nobis temporaneus et serotinus terroe. Dixerat quod instar leonis ad venationem progressi, in profanum populum desaeviret, munus videlicet exercens ultionis, quae postquam incitata coepisset impios atterere, non prius a poenarum illatione cessaret, quam illi ad quaerendum Dominum toto deinceps precum ambitu se contulissent. Sed quonam magna esi in ipsa supplicandi professione discretio, et offerunt alteram,, solo terrore perculsi, alteram vero, cum metu, etiam ratione correcti, quid in utraque momenti sit, curavit exprimere, ut quamvis una facies appareret ambarum, tamen intelligeremus, quod diversis radicibus niterentur: illa, videlicet, solummodo perturbationis, ista etiam de correctione, virtutis. Quia ergo dixerat, quod nequaquam ad juvandum prodiret, nisi ad quaesitionem vultus ejus, succumbens castigationi gens illa se converteret, pergit necessario, quam supplicationem praestolaretur, exponere, et illius primo verba sub irrisione percurrit, quam pro sui levitate ostendit reprobandam, id est, quae solis vocibus adulatur, cum rerum agitur destituta ponderibus, cujus habitum, et genus, etiam sacrum carmen accusat. Cum occideret eos, inquit, quaerebant eum, et convertebantur ante lucem, et veniebant ad eum: cor autem ipsorum non erat rectum, in tribulatione sua mane consurgent ud me. Venite, et revertamur ad Dominum, quia ipse coepit et sanabit nos, percutiet et curabit nos. Vivificabit nos post duos dies, in die tertia suscitabit nos, et vivemus in conspectu ejus, sciemus sequemurque, ut cognoscamus Dominum: quasi diluculum praeparatus est egressus ejus, et veniet quasi imber nobis temporaneus et serotinus terrae. Cum me, inquit, quaerere caeperitis, non ista, quam gestatis in labiis, oratione placabor, nec si potentiam meam simul clementiamque laudetis, dicentes quod tam sim ad ignoscendum paratus, ut praeveniam vota beneficiis, nec manere quam intuli plagam per spatia bidui sinam, sed tertia die vivificaturus adveniam. Et rivemus in conspectu ejus, quam dederit, vitae foelicitate polientes. Sciamus atque scrutemur eum, qui noctes angorum dolorumque nostrorum, quasi matutinum lumen, expellat, et tribuendis copiis illabatur instar imbris tempestivi et serotini. Ista, inquam, quae sine emendatione morum form diter soletis cantare, despiciam. At quae referam, contuemini. Vere. 4. — Quid faciam tibi, Effraim? quid faciam tibi, Juda? Misericordia vestra (quam promissis videlicet cantilenis, ame vobis affore dicebatis, ut vestris utar imaginibus) matutinae nubis instar, evanuit, et quasi crepurcularis humor, sole veniente, est siccatus: id est, ita illud quod tibi parcere consueveram, vapore nostrae indigna t ion s absumitur, ut desit undo malorum refrigerium consequaris. Neque id accidit ideo quod mea sit, sed quod tua non sit mutata sententia. Ego enim justitia: et clementiae pariter jura custodiens, nolueram punire quos terrui. Vos autem nec plagarum denunciatione commoti, in effectum coegistis abire terrores.
Verses 1–3. — “In their trouble they will rise early to me: Come, and let us return to the Lord, for he has taken, and he will heal us; he will strike, and he will cure us. He will revive us after two days; on the third day he will raise us up, and we shall live in his sight, and we shall know and follow on to know the Lord. His going forth is prepared like the dawn, and he will come to us like the early and the late rain of the earth.” He had said that like a lion going out to hunt he would rage against the profane people, exercising the office of vengeance, which, once roused and begun to wear down the ungodly, would not cease from inflicting punishments until they had betaken themselves to seeking the Lord thereafter with all the earnestness of prayer. But since there is a great difference in the very profession of supplication, and some offer one kind struck by terror alone, others another kind, corrected by reason as well as by fear, he took care to express what weight each has, so that although both seem to have one face, we might understand that they rest on different roots: the one only on disturbance, the other also on the virtue that comes from correction. Since he had said that he would not come forth to help unless that nation, yielding to chastisement, turned to seek his face, he necessarily goes on to explain what supplication he waited for, and first he runs through the words of that supplication with mockery, showing that it must be rejected for its lightness: the kind that flatters with words alone while it is empty of the weight of deeds, whose manner and kind a holy song also accuses: “When he slew them,” it says, “they sought him, and they turned and came to him before dawn; but their heart was not right.” “In their trouble they will rise early to me: Come, and let us return to the Lord, for he has taken, and he will heal us; he will strike, and he will cure us. He will revive us after two days; on the third day he will raise us up, and we shall live in his sight; we shall know and follow on to know the Lord. His going forth is prepared like the dawn, and he will come to us like the early and the late rain of the earth.” “When you begin to seek me,” he says, “I will not be appeased by this prayer that you carry on your lips, not even if you praise my power and my mercy together, saying that I am so ready to forgive that I anticipate prayers with benefits, and will not let the blow I have inflicted remain for the space of two days, but will come on the third day to give life.” “And we shall live in his sight,” enjoying the happiness of the life he has given. “Let us know and search out him who drives away the nights of our anguish and pain like the morning light, and comes down with the gift of plenty like timely and late rain.” “These things,” I say, “which you are accustomed to sing by rote without amending your conduct, I will despise. But consider what I shall answer.” Verse 4. — “What shall I do to you, Ephraim? What shall I do to you, Judah?” “Your mercy (which, in your promised songs, you said would be present to you from me, to use your own images) has vanished like a morning cloud, and has dried up like the dew of twilight when the sun comes: that is, my habit of sparing you is so consumed by the heat of our indignation that you lack any relief from your evils. Nor does this happen because my sentence has changed, but because yours has not. For I, guarding the rights of justice and of mercy alike, had not wished to punish those whom I had frightened. But you, unmoved even by the announcement of blows, forced the terrors to pass into effect.”
Hos 6:1–4 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 78:34–37 (77:34-Ps Vulg.) (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Julian reads the people’s words ‘after two days he will revive us’ as a facile prayer without amendment, which God rejects: their mercy has vanished like morning dew because they did not change.
- Julian treats Hos 6:1–3 as the shallow prayer of the people that God refuses, not as a prophecy of the resurrection on the third day; this is translated as written. The comment also takes in 6:4. The quotation is Ps 78:34–37 (Latin 77).
Cite (SBL): Julian of Eclanum, Tract. proph. 1.6.1 (PL 21:992c–993c; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/julian-eclanum-tractatus-prophetarum/1-6-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/julian-eclanum-tractatus-prophetarum/1-6-1
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-julian-eclanum-tractatus-prophetarum-1-6-1) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin as printed in Migne PL 21 (among Rufinus's works); no public-domain or FOTC English exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
1.6.2PL 21:993c–994a
Vers. 5. — Propter hoc dolavi in prophetis; occidi eos in verbis oris mei, et judicia tua quasi lux egredientur, id est, admovi prophetalium comminationum secures, et cum tantis cumulis mala inferenda descripsi, ut rei quique ipso facile consternarentur auditu. Sed quoniam imprudentiam tuam coercere nequivit elaborata maxime terroris ambitio, necesse est invebi, quas non profuit intimari. Ideo judicia tua quasi lux egredientur, ut nemo jam quid merearis ignoret, nec deformitas loa sub aliqua religionis specie, quam in offerendis habuisti sacrificiis, delilescat. Caeterum rerum exitu pendente, colluceat, me bonas affectiones magis quam hostias opulentas expetisse: illumque mihi acceptum fuisse, qui juvando per misericordiam proximo, magis quam imbuendo per sacrificium altari, sedulus exsitisset, et scientiam Dei, praeceptum ejus universis sacrificiis praetulisset. Tu ergo, qui haec didicisse contemnens, nihil de moribus, nihil de virtutibus cogitasti, sed me, quem diuturnis actibus asperabas, laudum et hostiarum muneribus placare posse arbitratus es, rerum saltem periclis, cujus sim gravitatis intellige. Misericordia, quam laudabas immeritus, quasi nubes matutina praeteriit; judicia vero, quibus convictus addiceris, quasi dies adulta lucebunt.
Verse 5. — “Therefore I have hewn them by the prophets; I have slain them by the words of my mouth; and your judgments shall go forth like light”: that is, “I applied the axes of prophetic threats, and described the evils to be inflicted with such heaps of detail that all the guilty might easily be dismayed by the mere hearing. But since the most elaborate display of terror could not restrain your folly, what it did not help to announce must necessarily be brought on. Therefore your judgments shall go forth like light, so that no one may any longer be ignorant of what you deserve, nor may your ugliness lie hidden under any appearance of religion, such as you had in offering sacrifices. Rather, when the outcome of events is settled, let it shine out that I sought good dispositions more than rich sacrifices, and that he was acceptable to me who was diligent in helping his neighbor through mercy rather than in staining the altar through sacrifice, and who preferred the knowledge of God, his commandment, to all sacrifices. You, then, who despised learning these things and gave no thought to conduct, none to virtues, but thought you could appease me, whom you provoked with your daily acts, with gifts of praises and sacrifices, understand at least by the dangers of events how weighty I am. The mercy you praised, undeserving, has passed like a morning cloud; but the judgments by which you are convicted and condemned will shine like the full day.”
Hos 6:5 (quotation, high confidence) · Hos 6:6 (allusion, high confidence) · Hos 6:4 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: God struck Israel with prophetic threats in vain; now his judgment will shine out to show that he desired mercy and the knowledge of God rather than sacrifices.
- The comment paraphrases Hos 6:6 (“I desire mercy and not sacrifice”).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (footnote letter and OCR slip in the digital text): hostias a oputentas → hostias opulentas.
Topics: Ethics
Cite (SBL): Julian of Eclanum, Tract. proph. 1.6.2 (PL 21:993c–994a; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/julian-eclanum-tractatus-prophetarum/1-6-2). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/julian-eclanum-tractatus-prophetarum/1-6-2
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-julian-eclanum-tractatus-prophetarum-1-6-2) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin as printed in Migne PL 21 (among Rufinus's works); no public-domain or FOTC English exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
1.6.3PL 21:994a–994d
Vers. 7. — Ipsi autem sicut Adam transgressi pactum, proevaricati sunt in me. Instituto ordine sermonis ingreditur, ut postquam supplicia comminatus, fuerit, materiam eorum, idest, culpas quibus esi excitata offensio, subjungat. Unde et hic, postquam claram fore ultionem promisit, quo reatu obligarentur, a(??)jecit. Cujus ut pondus exponeret, antiqui recordatus est exempli. Ubi sane notanda est elocutio prophetae, multis ejusmodi locis, explanationis lumen adportans. Ait eum, Sicut Adam transgressi sunt pactum: ibi praevaricati sunt in me. Non utique quod isti in Paradiso praevaricationem admisisse videantur; sed quoniam dixerat, ita illos, sicut Adam, praeceptum fuisse transgressos, subdidit, eos ibi peccavisse; in eadem nimirum similitudine delinquendo; quod tamen sagacem intellectum requirit. Adam quippe et si violator fuit praecepti, nullis tamen legitur idolis supplicasse, nec aliquod eorum criminum, de quibus Israel arguitur, perpetrasse. Unde ergo illi primo homini degens in summis sceleribus populus comparatur? Haud ob aliud profecto, quam quod et si non aeque sacrilegi, aeque tamen docentur ingrati. Nam sicut Adam, qui in Paradisum, ut inlaboratis copiis uteretur, fuerat inductus, nu Ia angoris materia, nulla conquestione exorta seductoris maluit quam creatoris implere mandatum, plusque apud eum valuit blanda de falsitate promissio, quam tot muneribus, tot miraculis, creatoris stipata praescriptio, quae usum videlicet omnium, sub unius pomi exceptione, contulerat: statimque temerator praecepti, experimentum caepit exilii, et summam foelicitatem pene ultima captivitate mutavit, ita ut peccatum ejus arva deinceps, fertilitatem suam negando, castigarent: juxta hunc modum populus Effraim, qui terrae copiis, quasi Paradisi amoenitate, fruebatur, nullam offensionis materiam, idest, nihil quod de Dei indulgentia et liberalitate quereretur, inveniens, quasi solo virtutum odio laboraret, errores praetulit veritati, et ad cultum idolorum, spreta, quae salutaris erat, religione defecit. In eam dem igitur culpam cecidisse dicuntur, cum eo cujus conditionem videntur imitati, et magna ingratarum gentium percelluntur invidia, qui nullius auctorem muneris, tantumque ad evertendum peritum, opifici suo largeque conferenti bona omnia, praetulerunt.
Verse 7. — “But they, like Adam, transgressed the covenant; there they dealt faithlessly against me.” He proceeds in the established order of his speech: after threatening punishments, he adds their ground, that is, the faults by which the offense was roused. So here too, after promising that vengeance would be plain, he added the guilt by which they were bound. To set out its weight, he recalled an ancient example. Here the prophet’s manner of speaking should be noted, since it brings the light of explanation to many such passages. He says, “Like Adam they transgressed the covenant; there they dealt faithlessly against me.” Not, certainly, that they seem to have committed transgression in paradise; but since he had said that they transgressed the commandment as Adam did, he added that they sinned “there,” that is, in sinning in the same likeness. This, however, requires a sharp understanding. For Adam, though he was a violator of a commandment, is not read to have prayed to any idols, nor to have committed any of the crimes of which Israel is accused. Why, then, is a people living in the worst crimes compared with that first man? Surely for no other reason than that, although they are not shown to be equally sacrilegious, they are shown to be equally ungrateful. For Adam had been brought into paradise to enjoy riches gained without labor; with no ground for anguish, with no complaint arising, he preferred to fulfill the command of the seducer rather than of the Creator; a flattering promise from falsehood weighed more with him than the Creator’s prescription, crowded with so many gifts and so many wonders, which had granted the use of everything with the exception of one fruit. At once the violator of the commandment began to experience exile, and exchanged the highest happiness for what was almost the last captivity, so that thereafter the fields chastised his sin by denying their fertility. In the same way the people of Ephraim, which enjoyed the riches of the land as if the pleasantness of paradise, finding no ground for offense, that is, nothing to complain of in God’s indulgence and generosity, as though it suffered only from hatred of virtues, preferred errors to the truth and, despising the religion that was saving, fell away to the worship of idols. They are said, then, to have fallen into the same fault as the one whose condition they seem to have imitated, and they are struck by the great reproach of ungrateful nations, since they preferred one who was the author of no gift and skilled only at overthrowing to their Maker, who bestowed all good things generously.
Hos 6:7 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 2:15–17 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 3:1–6 (allusion, high confidence) · Gen 3:17–24 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Julian explains that Israel transgressed ‘like Adam’ not by the same crimes but by the same ingratitude: both, given every good, preferred the seducer to the Creator and were sent into exile.
- Julian, the chief opponent of Augustine on original sin, here treats Adam’s sin as an example of ingratitude that Israel imitated, punished by Adam’s exile and the curse on the ground; he says nothing here about its effect on Adam’s descendants. The text is translated as written.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (footnote letter left in the digital text): pactum: b ibi → pactum: ibi; ut c inlaboratis → ut inlaboratis.
Cite (SBL): Julian of Eclanum, Tract. proph. 1.6.3 (PL 21:994a–994d; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/julian-eclanum-tractatus-prophetarum/1-6-3). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/julian-eclanum-tractatus-prophetarum/1-6-3
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-julian-eclanum-tractatus-prophetarum-1-6-3) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin as printed in Migne PL 21 (among Rufinus's works); no public-domain or FOTC English exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
1.6.4PL 21:994d–995b
Vers. 8. 9. — Galaad civitas operantium idolum, supplantata sanguine; et quasi fauces virorum latronam particeps sacerdotum, in via interficientium pergentes de Sichem, quia scelus operati sunt in domo Israel. Quia, ut saepe diximus, non unam quamcumque personam, sed populum coarguit, tum generali oratione, quae sunt acta, percurrit, tum in quibus singulae urbes reliquis quasi amplius commisere, dinumerat. Quamvis ergo lota ipsa regio cultu horreret idolorum: tamen erant sine dubio certa loca, quae eo plus sacrilegii collegerant, quo plus, vel de opportunitatibus commerciorum, vel de multitudine incolarum, celebritatis habuissent. Ex his ergo et Galaad et Sichem urbes insignes profanitatibus introducit. Galaad, Inquit, praecipua civitas eorum, qui idola fabricantur, haud minus crudelitatis studiis quam profanitatis exultat. Nam quasi fauces latronem, ita ejus municipes sanguini inhiant innocentum. Nam sacerdotum suorum, idest, Aruspicum suasionibus servientes, si quis ad templum Dei voluisset ascendere, hunc illi aggrediebantur in itinere, a tempto Dei avertentes, et ad societatem erroris proprii pertrahentes. ai si parum suadendo promoverent, etiam caedibus rem gerebant. Propter quod dicit, Particeps sacerdotum in via interficientium pergentes de Sichem, quia scelus operati sunt. Primo videlicet ipsi in sacrilegio corruendo, tum quod propria non essent prolapsione contenti, sed alios quoque in similem ruinam, vel suadendo deducerent, vel cogendo. Quod scelus merito pronunciatur, tantum videlicet studium impietatis babuisse, ut etiam invitis et teluctantibus niteremur infundere.
Verses 8, 9. — “Gilead is a city of those who work idols, tripped up by blood; and like the jaws of robbers is the partnership of the priests, killing on the road those who go from Shechem, for they have done wickedness in the house of Israel.” Since, as we have often said, he is accusing not some one person but the people, he now runs through what was done in a general speech, now lists in what things particular cities committed more than the rest. Although the whole region bristled with the worship of idols, there were certainly particular places that had gathered more sacrilege, the more renown they had either from the convenience of trade or from the multitude of their inhabitants. Of these he brings in Gilead and Shechem, cities notable for their profanities. “Gilead,” he says, “the chief city of those who make idols, exults no less in the pursuits of cruelty than of profanity. For like the jaws of robbers, its citizens gape for the blood of the innocent. Serving the persuasions of their priests, that is, of the soothsayers, if anyone wished to go up to the temple of God, they attacked him on the road, turning him away from the temple of God and dragging him into the fellowship of their own error; and if they achieved little by persuasion, they carried out the business by murder.” This is why he says, “The partnership of the priests, killing on the road those who go from Shechem, for they have done wickedness”: first in falling themselves into sacrilege, then in not being content with their own fall but leading others into a similar ruin, whether by persuading or by compelling. This is rightly declared wickedness, that they had such zeal for ungodliness that they strove to pour it even into the unwilling and resisting.
Hos 6:8–9 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Gilead and Shechem were centers of idolatry whose people, urged on by their priests, waylaid and even killed those going up to God’s temple.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (footnote letter left in the digital text): operati sunt d in domo → operati sunt in domo; propria non a essent → propria non essent.
Cite (SBL): Julian of Eclanum, Tract. proph. 1.6.4 (PL 21:994d–995b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/julian-eclanum-tractatus-prophetarum/1-6-4). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/julian-eclanum-tractatus-prophetarum/1-6-4
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-julian-eclanum-tractatus-prophetarum-1-6-4) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin as printed in Migne PL 21 (among Rufinus's works); no public-domain or FOTC English exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
1.6.5PL 21:995b
Vers. 10. — In domo Israel vidi horrendum negotium, ibi fornicationes Effraim: contaminatus est Israel. Ut totam regionem doceat fuisse profanatam, loca etiam diversa commemorat, et sicut supra, Galaaditas, latrocinantum more, ait, viatoribus insiluisse, ut eos a recto calle deducerent: ita nunc horrendum negotium in domo Israelis, vel in Samaria, vel in lota regione, vidisse se p(??)onumiat, idest, totum populum Effraim, absque exceptione, sacrilegiis maculari. Quibus quoniam criminibus saepe jam dixerat impendere supplicii, nunc sola meritorum enumeratione contentus transit ad Judam, eumque commonens, ut sciat severitatem judicis non posse corrumpi, sed se quoque, nisi corrigi festinaverit, similium calamitatum stipendia recepturum.
Verse 10. — “In the house of Israel I have seen a horrible thing; there are the immoralities of Ephraim: Israel is defiled.” To show that the whole region had been profaned, he mentions various places too; and just as above he said that the Gileadites leapt on travelers like robbers to lead them away from the right path, so now he declares that he has seen a horrible thing in the house of Israel, either in Samaria or in the whole region: that is, that the whole people of Ephraim without exception is stained with sacrileges. Since he had often said already that punishment hung over these crimes, he is now content merely to list their deserts, and passes over to Judah, warning it to know that the severity of the judge cannot be bribed, and that it too, unless it hastens to be corrected, will receive the wages of similar calamities.
Hos 6:10 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: The whole of Israel is defiled; the prophet turns to warn Judah that it will suffer the same unless it amends.
Cite (SBL): Julian of Eclanum, Tract. proph. 1.6.5 (PL 21:995b; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/julian-eclanum-tractatus-prophetarum/1-6-5). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/julian-eclanum-tractatus-prophetarum/1-6-5
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-julian-eclanum-tractatus-prophetarum-1-6-5) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin as printed in Migne PL 21 (among Rufinus's works); no public-domain or FOTC English exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.
1.6.6PL 21:995b–995c
Vers. 11. — Sed et, Juda, pone messem libi, cum convertero captivitatem populi mei. Noli aestimare, o tribus Juda, fore te damnationis immunem, quia in tuis finibus, conte in captivitatem Israelis populo, subsistit. Preavenerat te siquidem ille in iniquitatibus: fuit consequens ut in miseriis praeveniret. Sed tu, quem comitaris in flagitiis, diam calamitatibus consequere, hoc tamen deterior aestimandus, quia nihil libi proficit quod prior est ille damnatus. Pone ergo messem tibi, cum convertero populi mei captivitatem. Vide, inquit, ne dubites, quoniam cum tempus debitae ultionis advenerit, captivitas quam nunc populus meus, idest, germani ini, pronunciante justitia, pertulerunt, convertatur ad te, ul etiam tu similiter demetaris, quia sicut in lachrymis poenitentiae seminantes, revehunt gaudiorum manipulos: ita qui gaudia polluta sectantur, messem dolorum et planctum [F. planctuum] congregabunt.
Verse 11. — “But you also, Judah, set a harvest for yourself, when I turn back the captivity of my people.” “Do not think, O tribe of Judah, that you will be free of condemnation because you remain within your borders while the people of Israel has been led into captivity. He went before you in iniquities; it followed that he should go before you in miseries. But you, who accompany him in outrages, will follow him also in calamities, and are to be judged the worse in this, that it profits you nothing that he was condemned first. Set a harvest for yourself, then, when I turn back the captivity of my people. See,” he says, “that you do not doubt that, when the time of due vengeance has come, the captivity which my people, that is, your brothers, have now suffered at the sentence of justice will be turned on you, so that you too are reaped in the same way. For just as those who sow in the tears of repentance bring back sheaves of joy, so those who pursue polluted joys will gather a harvest of sorrows and laments.”
Hos 6:11 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 126:5–6 (125:5-Ps Vulg.) (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Judah should not think itself safe because Israel went first into captivity; it too will reap a harvest of sorrow.
- The last sentence alludes to Ps 126:5–6 (Latin 125).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR slip in the digital text; footnote letter left in the digital text): seminantes, b revehunt → seminantes, revehunt; proCnil → proficit.
Cite (SBL): Julian of Eclanum, Tract. proph. 1.6.6 (PL 21:995b–995c; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/p/julian-eclanum-tractatus-prophetarum/1-6-6). (abbreviation not yet checked)
Permanent link: https://sophiascriptura.com/p/julian-eclanum-tractatus-prophetarum/1-6-6
BibTeX · RIS · CSL-JSON (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-julian-eclanum-tractatus-prophetarum-1-6-6) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin as printed in Migne PL 21 (among Rufinus's works); no public-domain or FOTC English exists, so each batch was re-read against the Latin.