Tractates on the Psalms
The whole work on one page. Select a passage number to open that passage with its notes, Scripture references, and citation.
Tractates on the Psalms 0.1
0.1CSEL 22:3–4
Diuersas esse plurimorum in psalmorum libro opiniones, ex libris ipsis, quos scriptos reliquerunt, compertum habemus. nam aliqui eos Hebraeorum in quinque libros diuisos uolunt esse, ut sit usque in quadragesimum psalmum liber primus et a quadragesimo usque in septuagesimum primum liber secundus et ex eo usque in octogesimum octauum liber tertius et usque in centesimum quintum liber quartus — ob quod hi omnes psalmi in consummatione sua habeant, fiat, fiat —, concludatur deinde in centesimo quinquagesimo psalmo liber quintus. alii uero ita inscribendos psalmos existimauerunt: psalmi Dauid, quo titulo intellegi uolunt, eos omnes a Dauid fuisse conscriptos. sed nos secundum apostolicam auctoritatem librum psalmorum et nuncupamus et scribimus. ita enim in Actis apostolorum dictum meminimus: scriptum est enim in libro psalmorum: fiat domus eius deserta, et episcopium eius accipiet alius. ergo neque secundum quosdam Hebrseos quinque libri, neque secundum aliorum simplicitatem psalmi Dauid dicendi sunt, sed secundum apostolicam auctoritatem liber psalmorum esse noscendus est.
That many hold differing opinions about the book of Psalms we know from the books they have left in writing. Some would have them divided, as among the Hebrews, into five books, so that the first book runs to the fortieth psalm, the second from the fortieth to the seventy-first, the third from there to the eighty-eighth, and the fourth to the hundred and fifth (on the ground that all these psalms have at their close "So be it, so be it"), and the fifth book then closes with the hundred and fiftieth psalm. Others have thought the psalms should be entitled "Psalms of David," by which title they mean that all of them were written by David. But we, following apostolic authority, both name and write it "the book of Psalms." For we remember that in the Acts of the Apostles it is said: "For it is written in the book of Psalms: Let his house become desolate, and let another take his office of overseer." So it is not to be called five books, as some Hebrews hold, nor "Psalms of David," as others simply say, but, following apostolic authority, it is to be known as the book of Psalms.
0.2CSEL 22:4
Sunt autem plures eorundem psalmorum scriptores. nam aliquibus Dauid auctor praescribitur, in aliquibus Salomon, in aliquibus Asaph, in aliquibus Idith um, in aliquibus filiorum Chore, in aliquo Moyses. et quidem absurdum est psalmos Dauid nominare, cum ibi auctores eorum ipsis inscriptionum titulis commendentur. et liber psalmorum rectius esse dicatur, diuersis in unum uolumen prophetiis diuersorum et auctorum et temporum congregatis. visum autem aliquibus est Hieremise et Aggsei et Zacharise quorundam psalmorum superscriptionibus nomina praenotare, cum horum nihil in authenticis septuaginta translatorum libris ita editum reperiatur, adeo ut etiam in plurimis latinis et graecis codicibus sine horum nominibus simplices tantum psalmorum tituli praeferantur.
There are, moreover, several writers of these psalms. For some have David set at their head as author, some Solomon, some Asaph, some Idithun, some the sons of Core, one Moses. It is indeed absurd to call them Psalms of David when their authors are named in the very headings of the titles. It is more correctly called the book of Psalms, since prophecies of different authors and different times have been gathered into one volume. Some have also seen fit to set the names of Jeremiah, Haggai, and Zechariah before the headings of certain psalms, although nothing of this kind is found so issued in the authentic books of the Seventy translators; indeed, even in very many Latin and Greek manuscripts only the plain titles of the psalms appear, without these names.
0.3CSEL 22:4–5
De his autem, qui sine diuersorum auctorum nominibus sub diuersis superscriptionibus habentur, antiquorum uirorum ista traditio est, quod ex eo psalmo, cuius auctor in superscriptione ponitur, qui deinceps sine auctorum superscriptione succedunt, illius esse existimandi sunt, qui anterioris psalmi auctor inscribitur, usque in eum psalmum, in quo nomen auctoris alterius prseferatur: ut si psalmi alicuius superscriptio talis sit: psalmus Dauid, ceteri, qui sine titulo consequantur, Dauid esse credantur, donec cum prophetae alterius nomen in superscriptione ponatur; et ex eo usque in alterum prophetam, qui sine inscriptione medii sunt, eius sint, qui in anterioris psalmi superscriptione auctor c“ptus sit anteferri.
As for those psalms that stand under various headings without the names of different authors, the tradition of the ancients is this: the psalms that follow without an author in the heading after a psalm whose author is named are to be reckoned as belonging to the author named for the preceding psalm, up to the psalm in which the name of another author is set at the head. So, if the heading of some psalm reads "A psalm of David," the rest that follow without a title are to be believed David's until the name of another prophet is placed in a heading; and from there to the next prophet, those that stand between without an inscription belong to the one who began to be set at the head as author in the heading of the earlier psalm.
0.4CSEL 22:5–6
Quod si forte aliquis per id intellegentise huic fidem detrahet, quod in his psalmis, qui eum psalmum. cui Moyses auctor praelatus est, subsecuntur, scriptum sit, id est in nonagesimo octauo: Moyses et Aaron in sacerdotes eius et Samuel inter inuocantes nomen eius, non posse a Moyse eum prophetatum uideri, cum Samuel nomen, qui tanto postea. quam Moyses, natus est, extet in psalmo, meminerit, nulli mirum aut difficile uideri oportere, ut tantus propheta tanti prophetae, postea licet futuri. nomen ediderit, cum in Regnorum libris Iosiae regis nomen sit, antequam nasceretur, prophetatum, propheta dicente: altarium, altarium, hsec dicit dominus: ecce filius nascetur Dauid, Iosias nomen eius, per quod non incredibile esse oportere, ut Samuel a Moyse praedicatus sit, maxime cum secundum Hieremiam dicentem: nec si stet Moyses et Samuel, Moysi cognominatus et coaequatus sit ex merito sanctitatis. quae traditio ab Esdra, quantum creditur, psalmos post captiuitatem in unum librum colligente profecta si falsa aut inprobabilis existimabitur, ab his, qui contradicent, auctores horum psalmorum demonstrari necesse est. absolutum enim est, non potuisse eos nisi prophetis prophetantibus prophetari.
But perhaps someone will withhold belief from this understanding on the ground that in the psalms that follow the one headed by Moses as author, namely in the ninety-eighth, it is written: "Moses and Aaron among his priests, and Samuel among those who call on his name," and so the psalm cannot be thought prophesied by Moses, since the name of Samuel, who was born so long after Moses, stands in the psalm. Let him remember that no one ought to find it strange or hard that so great a prophet should have uttered the name of so great a prophet, though he was yet to come, since in the books of Kingdoms the name of King Josiah was prophesied before he was born, the prophet saying: "Altar, altar, thus says the Lord: Behold, a son shall be born to David, Josiah is his name." From this it should not seem incredible that Samuel was foretold by Moses, especially since, according to Jeremiah, who says, "Not even if Moses and Samuel should stand," he was named alongside Moses and made his equal by the merit of his holiness. If this tradition, which, so far as is believed, originated with Ezra when he gathered the psalms into one book after the captivity, is judged false or improbable, those who contradict it must show who the authors of these psalms are. For it is settled that they could not have been prophesied except by prophets prophesying.
0.5CSEL 22:6–7
Non est uero ambigendum, ea, quae in psalmis dicta sunt. secundum euangelicam prsedicationem intellegi oportere, ut ex quacumque licet persona prophetise spiritus sit locutus, tamen totum illud ad cognitionem aduentus domini nostri Iesu Christi et corporationis et passionis et regni, et resurrectionis nostrae gloriam uirtutemque referatur. sunt autem omnes prophetise'ad mundialem sensum et prudentiam saeculi clausae atque obsignatse?, secundum illud Esaiae: et erunt uobis uerba omnia haec tanquam eloquia libri huius signati. quod si qui dederint homini scienti litteras dicentes: lege ista, et dicet: non possum legere, signatum est enim. et si dabitur liber hic in manus hominis nescientis litteras, et dicetur ei: lege hunc. et respondebit: nescio litteras. imperitia legendi et intellegendi librum prophetise sub persona utriusque hominis monstrata est, cum intellegentia docti ad legendum, signaculum clausi mysterii non adeuntis, illius indocti ignorationi per communem utrique intellegendi inopiam comparatur. sunt enim uniuersa allegoricis et typicis contexta uirtutibus: per quse omnia unigeniti dei filii in corpore et gignendi et patiendi et moriendi et resurgendi et in aeternum cum conglorificatis sibi, qui in eum crediderint, regnandi et ceteros iudicandi sacramenta panduntur. et quia scribse et pharissei dei filium natum in corpore non recipientes omnibus prophetiae intellegentiae aditum denegarent, sub denuntiatione p“nse ita a domino arguuntur: use uobis legis doctores, qui abstulistis clauem scientiae: ipsi non introitis et introeuntes non sinitis introire. negantes enim Christum, cuius aduentus opus est prophetarum, clauem scientiae abstulerunt; quia cognitionem legis, quae aduentum domini corporeum pradicauit, fides corporei aduentus abnegata prsecludit.
There is no doubt that what is said in the psalms must be understood according to the gospel proclamation, so that, whatever the person through whom the spirit of prophecy has spoken, the whole is referred to the knowledge of the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, his taking a body, his passion and his kingdom, and to the glory and power of our resurrection. All prophecies are closed and sealed to worldly sense and the wisdom of this age, according to the saying of Isaiah: "And all these words shall be to you like the words of this sealed book. If they give it to a man who knows letters, saying, Read this, he will say, I cannot read it, for it is sealed. And if this book is given into the hands of a man who does not know letters, and it is said to him, Read this, he will answer, I do not know letters." The inability to read and understand the book of prophecy is shown in the person of each man, since the understanding of the learned man, who does not approach the seal of the closed mystery so as to read it, is likened to the ignorance of the unlearned through the lack of understanding common to both. For all things are woven together with allegorical and typical powers, through which are laid open all the mysteries of the only-begotten Son of God: his being born in the body, suffering, dying, and rising again, his reigning for ever with those who believe in him and are glorified with him, and his judging the rest. And because the scribes and Pharisees, not receiving the Son of God born in the body, denied everyone access to the understanding of prophecy, they are rebuked by the Lord under threat of punishment: "Woe to you, teachers of the law, who have taken away the key of knowledge: you do not enter yourselves, and you do not allow those who are entering to enter." For by denying Christ, whose coming is the work of the prophets, they took away the key of knowledge, since the faith in his bodily coming, once denied, shuts off the knowledge of the law, which proclaimed the Lord's bodily coming.
0.6CSEL 22:7–8
Et hoc quidem ex omni scripturarum propheticarum genere dictum esse intellegendum est, ut, nisi in aduentum domini ex uirgine in hominem procreandi intellectse et recognitae fuerint, intellegentise earum uis obsignata habeatur et clausa. tamen nequaquam psalmorum librum nisi per fidem aduentus eius posse intellegi, ita beati Ioannis Apocalypsi docemur: et angelo Philadelphise ecclesse scribe: haec dicit sanctus et uerus, qui habet clauem Dauid, qui aperit, et nemo claudet; qui claudit, et nemo aperiet. clauem igitur Dauid habet, quia ipse hsec septem qusedam signacula, quse de corporalitate eius et passione et morte et resurrectione et gloria et regno et iudicio Dauid de eo in psalmis prophetat, absoluit, aperiens, quod nemo claudet, et claudens, quod nemo aperiet; quia per hanc, quae in illo expleta est prophetia, aperiet, quod nemo prsecludet, et contra expletse in eo prophetise fide abnegata claudet, quod nemo possit aperire. nullus enim nisi ille, in quo hsec prophetata sunt et expleta., clauem intellegentise huius impertiet. denique id ipsum in consequentibus docuit, dicens: et uidi super dexteram sedentis in throno librum scriptum de intus etde foris, signatum signaculis septem; et uidialterum angelum ualidum. prsedicantem in uoce magna: quis est dignus aperire librum et soluere signacula eius? et nemo potuit neque in cselo neque in terra neque infra terram aperire librum. neque uidere ipsum. et ego flebam multum. quia nemo dignus repertus essetaperire librum. neque uidere ipsum. et unus de senioribus ait mihi: noli flere. ecce uicit leo de tribu Iuda. radix Dauid aperire librum et septem signacula eius. liber iste et praeterita et futura in his. quse in:ro et foris scripta erant. continens a nemine dignus est aperiri: et apostoli fletus ob desiderium intellegenti» et dolorem difficultatis exoritur. sed uicit leo de tribu Iuda et radix Dauid. librum et signacula eius aperire: quia solus septem illa, quae superius docuimus, signacula, quibus liber clausus est, per sacramentum corporationis suae et diuinitatis absoluit. id ipsum autem dominus post resurrectionem testatus est, dicens: quoniam omnia oportet inpleri. quae scripta sunt in lege Moysi et in prophetis et in psalmis de me. per haec ergo omnis prophetiae liber et signatus et clausus est: quia creditis his, quae inpleta per eam sunt cuncta illa. quae signata et clausa sunt, et aperientur et absoluentur.
This is to be understood as said of every kind of prophetic Scripture: unless they are understood and recognized as referring to the Lord's coming to be begotten as man from a virgin, the force of their meaning remains sealed and closed. Yet that the book of Psalms in particular can be understood only through faith in his coming, we are taught by the Apocalypse of blessed John: "And to the angel of the church of Philadelphia write: Thus says the holy and true one, who has the key of David, who opens and no one shall shut, who shuts and no one shall open." He has the key of David, then, because he unseals these seven seals, as it were, which David prophesies of him in the psalms concerning his bodily nature, passion, death, resurrection, glory, kingdom, and judgment, opening what no one shall shut and shutting what no one shall open. For through this prophecy fulfilled in him he will open what no one shall close, and conversely, when faith in the prophecy fulfilled in him is denied, he will shut what no one can open. For no one but he in whom these things were prophesied and fulfilled will impart the key to this understanding. Indeed, John taught this very thing in what follows, saying: "And I saw at the right hand of him who sat on the throne a book written within and without, sealed with seven seals; and I saw another mighty angel proclaiming with a loud voice: Who is worthy to open the book and to loose its seals? And no one, in heaven or on earth or under the earth, was able to open the book or to look into it. And I wept much, because no one was found worthy to open the book or to look into it. And one of the elders said to me: Do not weep; behold, the lion of the tribe of Judah, the root of David, has conquered, to open the book and its seven seals." This book, containing both past and future things in what was written within and without, is worthy to be opened by no one; and the apostle's weeping springs from longing for understanding and from grief at the difficulty. But the lion of the tribe of Judah, the root of David, has conquered, to open the book and its seals, because he alone loosed the seven seals we described above, by which the book was closed, through the mystery of his taking a body and of his divinity. The Lord himself bore witness to this after his resurrection, saying: "For all things must be fulfilled that are written in the law of Moses and in the prophets and in the psalms concerning me." By these things, then, the whole book of prophecy is both sealed and closed; for when you believe the things that were fulfilled through it, all those things that were sealed and closed will be opened and unsealed.
0.7CSEL 22:8–9
Et quam quam omnia a diuino spiritu per Dauid dicta esse ipsa domini professione noscamus. tamen etiam id ipsum prophetise huius species docet supernse et ca-lesris in eo doctrinae scientiam extitisse. eo enim organo prophetatum est, graece psalterium, hebraice nabla nuncupato, quod unum omnium musicorum organorum rectissimum est, nihil in se uel peruersum continens uel obliquum, neque quod ex inferioribus locis in sonum concentus musici commouetur: sed in formam dominici corporis constitutum organum sine ullo inflexu deflexuue directum est, organum ex supernis commotum et inpulsum et in cantionem supernae et caelestis institutionis animatum, non humili et terreno spiritu, ut cetera terrae organa, personum. non enim ille humilia atque terrena in illo corporis sui organo praedicauit, sicut ipse testatus est: qui est de terra, de terra est et de terra loquitur, qui autem de caelo uenit, quae uidit et audiuit, testatur. per hunc ergo supernum spiritum deus cantatur in psalmis, in forma domi- Dici corporis, in quo caelestis spiritus est locutus, forma quoque terreni huius et musici et ex supernis concinentis organi conparata.
And although we know from the Lord's own declaration that everything was spoken through David by the divine Spirit, yet the very form of this prophecy also teaches that the knowledge of a heavenly, celestial teaching was present in him. For the prophecy was uttered on the instrument called psalterium in Greek and nabla in Hebrew, which alone of all musical instruments is quite straight, having in it nothing crooked or slanting, and is not stirred to the sound of musical harmony from its lower parts. Rather, an instrument shaped in the form of the Lord's body, it is straight, with no bend or curve, an instrument moved and struck from above and animated to sing a heavenly and celestial teaching, not sounding with a low and earthly breath like the other instruments of earth. For he did not proclaim low and earthly things in that instrument of his body, as he himself testified: "He who is of the earth is of the earth and speaks of the earth; but he who comes from heaven bears witness to what he has seen and heard." Through this Spirit from above, then, God is sung in the psalms, in the form of the Lord's body in which the heavenly Spirit spoke, and the form of this earthly musical instrument, sounding from above, is likened to it.
0.8CSEL 22:9–10
Non est autem ignorandum, indiscretum apud Hebraeos numerum esse psalmorum, sed sine ordinis adnotatione esse conscriptos. non enim illic primus aut secundus aut tertius aut quinquagesimus aut centesimus praenotantur, sed sine discrimine aliquo ordinis numerique permixti sunt. Esdras enim, ut antiquae traditiones ferunt, incompositos eos et pro auctorum ac temporum diuersitate dispersos in uolumen unum collegit et rettulit. sed septuaginta seniores, secundum Moysi traditionem ad custodiam legis doctrinae in synagoga manentes, postea quam illis a rege Ptolomaeo transferendae ex hebraeo in graecum sermonem totius legis cura mandata est, spiritali et caelesti scientia uirtutes psalmorum intellegentes in numerum eos atque ordinem redegerunt, singulis quibusque numeris pro efficientia sua et absolutione perfectis perfectorum et efficientium psalmorum ordinem deputantes.
One should also know that among the Hebrews the number of the psalms is not distinguished; they were written down without any indication of order. There the first, second, third, fiftieth, or hundredth are not marked, but they are mixed together without any distinction of order or number. For Ezra, as the ancient traditions report, gathered them, unarranged and scattered according to the diversity of their authors and times, and set them down in one volume. But the seventy elders, who remained in the synagogue according to the tradition of Moses to guard the teaching of the law, after King Ptolemy had entrusted them with the task of translating the whole law from Hebrew into Greek, understood with spiritual and heavenly knowledge the powers of the psalms and brought them into number and order, assigning to each number, complete in its effect and fulfilment, the place of psalms complete and effective in the same way.
0.9CSEL 22:10
Et quamquam id ipsum ex singulorum psalmorum uirtutibus intellegi possit, tamen absolutissime in gestorum et temporum historia edocemur, psalmorum scilicet conlocationes secundum perfectorum numerorum esse efficientias ordinatas. psalmus enim tertius secundum historiam quinquagesimo psalmo posterior est; inscriptio namque utriusque multo interuallo temporis aetatisque diuersa est. nam ille, quse sub Uria et Dauid sunt gesta, conplectitur: ille autem fugam Dauid Abessalon filio suo eum persequente significat; sed uirtus ac sacramentum numeri perfecit, hunc et illum pro conpetentibus et sibi congruis numeris conlocari.
Although this can be understood from the powers of the individual psalms, we are taught it most completely from the history of events and times: that the placing of the psalms was ordered according to the effects of perfect numbers. For according to the history the third psalm is later than the fiftieth, since the inscriptions of the two differ by a long interval of time and age. The latter covers what happened in the affair of Uriah and David, while the former signifies David's flight when his son Absalom was pursuing him. But the power and mystery of number brought it about that this one and that one were placed at the numbers fitting and suitable to them.
0.10CSEL 22:10
Inscriptio uero quinquagesimi psalmi secundum historiam quinquagesimi et primi psalmi inscriptione posterior est. sed quinquagesimi numeri uirtus exigebat et Doec Idumaei inpaenitens in Dauid odium postulabat, anteriorem postponi et posteriorem anteferri, ut remissio peccatorum in numero quinquagesimo conlocaretur et poena perfidiae numerum constitutae remissionis excedens careret uenia, cum et tempus et numerum psenitentise perdidisset. nam cum in quinquagesimo, in quo sunt sabbata sabbatorum, secundum iubelaei anni praeformationem peccatorum remissio sit constituta, conpetenter hic psalmus, in quo paenitentia lata peccatorum remissio postulatur, in ordine est huius numeri conlocatus.
Again, the inscription of the fiftieth psalm is, according to history, later than the inscription of the fifty-first. But the power of the number fifty, and the unrepentant hatred of Doeg the Edomite against David, required that the earlier be placed after and the later before: so that the forgiveness of sins might be placed at the number fifty, and the punishment of faithlessness, going beyond the number of the appointed forgiveness, might be without pardon, since it had lost both the time and the number of repentance. For since in the fiftieth, in which are the sabbaths of sabbaths, the forgiveness of sins is appointed according to the foreshadowing of the year of jubilee, this psalm, in which forgiveness of sins is asked for through the repentance offered, is fittingly placed in the order at this number.
0.11CSEL 22:10–11
Tribus uero quinquagesimis psalmorum liber continetur: et hoc ex ratione ac numero beatae illius nostrae expectationis existit. namque qui et primae quinquagesimae et secundae deinde quinquagesimae et tertiae rursum quinquagesimae, in qua finis est libri, consummationem diligenter aduertat, prouidentiam dispositorum in hunc ordinem psalmorum cum dispensatione salutis nostrae intelleget conuenire. cum enim primus gradus sit ad salutem, in nouum hominem post peccatorum remissionem renasci, sitque post psenitentise confessionem regnum illud domini in sanctae illius ciuitatis et caelestis Hierusalem tempora seruatum, et postea consummata in nos caelesti gloria in dei patris regnum per regnum filii proficiamus, in quo debitas deo laudes uniuersitas spirituum praedicabit: facile intellegemus in singulis psalmorum uirtutibus sub quinquageno numero conlocatis sacramentum dispositionis huius quinquagenarise contineri.
The book of Psalms consists of three fifties, and this arises from the reasoning and number of our blessed expectation. For whoever carefully notes the completion of the first fifty, then of the second fifty, and again of the third fifty, in which the book ends, will understand that the providence by which the psalms were arranged in this order agrees with the plan of our salvation. For the first step to salvation is to be reborn into the new man after the forgiveness of sins; after the confession of repentance, the kingdom of the Lord is kept for the times of that holy city, the heavenly Jerusalem; and afterwards, when heavenly glory is completed in us, we advance through the kingdom of the Son into the kingdom of God the Father, in which the whole company of spirits will proclaim the praises due to God. So we shall easily understand that the mystery of this arrangement by fifties is contained in the powers of the individual psalms placed at each fiftieth number.
0.12CSEL 22:11–12
Esse autem haec sabbata sabbatorum, septenarius numerus per septem in septuplum connumeratus ostendit; quem tamen ogdoas, quia dies eadem prima quae octaua, secundum euangelicam plenitudinem in ultimo sabbato adiecta consummat. et haec quidem sabbata sabbatorum ea ab apostolis religione celebrata sunt, ut his quinquagesimae diebus nullus neque in terram strato corpore adoraret neque ieiunio festiuitatem spiritalis huius beatitudinis inpediret; quod ipsum extrinsecus etiam in diebus dominicis est constitutum, qui ultra sabbati numerum per plenitudinem euangelicse praedicationis accedunt. namque cum in septimo die sabbati sit et nomen et obseruantia constituta, tamen nos in octaua die, quae et ipsa prima est, perfecti sabbati festiuitate lsetamur.
That these are sabbaths of sabbaths is shown by the number seven multiplied seven times; yet the eighth, because the first day is the same as the eighth, completes it, being added according to the fullness of the gospel in the last sabbath. These sabbaths of sabbaths were observed by the apostles with such reverence that on these days of the fifty no one either worshipped with body prostrate on the ground or hindered with fasting the festival of this spiritual blessedness. The same was also established outside this period for the Lord's days, which by the fullness of the gospel proclamation go beyond the number of the sabbath. For although the name and observance of the sabbath was set on the seventh day, we rejoice in the festival of the perfect sabbath on the eighth day, which is also the first.
0.13CSEL 22:12
Et dignum est hanc ogdoadis perfectam sacramentis caelestibus uirtutem in psalmo eo, qui octauo in numero dispositus est, contueri, cui pro torcularibus titulus adiectus est, uasculis in nouos fructus praeparatis et ad feruentis musti calorem continendum innouatis. et numerus iste ad percipiendos fructus euangelicos, caducis his corporum nostrorum uasculis reformatis. secundum ogdoadem est euangelicam destinatus. et hoc psalmi istius textus et sermo testatur. ogdoadis quoque istius uirtus tamquam in uirtute sexti psalmi et numeri, quo pro octauo oratio est, continetur: et hoc numeri ratio perfecit. ut et in sexto pro octauo esset oratio et in octauo titulus pro torcularibus adderetur. tribus autem in numeris haec torcularium superscriptio reperitur. nam et octauus et octogesimus et octogesimus-tertius psalmus hunc habent titulum,. ut in numeris perfectis perfectae huius beatitudinis ordo consisteret; ita tamenut simplicem ogdoadem et ogdoadis decadem sacramentum triadis, quae nostris Trinitas est nuncupata, concluderet.
It is fitting to observe this power of the eighth, made perfect by heavenly mysteries, in the psalm placed eighth in number, which bears the title "for the winepresses": vessels prepared for new fruits and renewed to hold the heat of the fermenting new wine. This number is appointed according to the gospel eighth for receiving the gospel fruits, when these perishable vessels of our bodies have been remade. The text and wording of that psalm bear witness to this. The power of this eighth is contained also, as it were, in the power of the sixth psalm and number, which is a prayer "for the eighth"; and the reasoning of number brought it about that in the sixth there should be a prayer for the eighth and in the eighth the title "for the winepresses" should be added. This heading "for the winepresses" is found at three numbers: the eighth, the eightieth, and the eighty-third psalm all have this title, so that the order of this perfect blessedness might stand in perfect numbers, yet in such a way that the mystery of the triad, which among us is called the Trinity, should enclose the simple eighth and the tenfold eighth.
0.14CSEL 22:12–13
Et hanc quidem ogdoadis perfectionem etiam in centesimo atque octauo decimo psalmo cognoscere possumus. namque in octonum numerum per octonos uersus secundum Hebrseos singularum litterarum initia collecta sunt; sed et ipsa uirtus psalmi sacramentum ogdoadis edocet. sunt autem in eo ogdoades uiginti duae. nam octoni uersus singularum litterarum initiis deputantur: et hoc ea ratione efficitur, ut, quia psalmus iste perfectum uirum secundum doctrinam euangelicam consummat, per omnes uiginti et duas Hebrsei sermonis litteras sub sacramento ogdoadis erudiremur.
We can recognize this perfection of the eighth also in the hundred and eighteenth psalm. For in it the beginnings of the individual letters, according to the Hebrews, are gathered into groups of eight, eight verses each; and the very power of the psalm teaches the mystery of the eighth. There are twenty-two eights in it, for eight verses are assigned to the beginning of each letter. This is so arranged in order that, since this psalm completes the perfect man according to the gospel teaching, we might be instructed through all twenty-two letters of the Hebrew language under the mystery of the eighth.
0.15CSEL 22:13
Et ea causa est, ut in uiginti duos libros lex Testamenti Veteris deputetur, ut cum litterarum numero conuenirent. qui ita secundum traditiones ueterum deputantur, ut Moysei sint libri quinque, Iesu Naue sextus, Iudicum et Ruth septimus, primus et secundus Regnorum octauus, tertius et quartus in nonum, Paralipomenon duo in decimum sint, sermones dierum Esdrse in undecimum, liber Psalmorum duodecimus sit, Salomonis Prouerbia, Ecclesiastes, Canticum canticorum in tertium decimum et quartum decimum et quintum decimum, duodecim autem minores Prophetae in sextum decimum, Esaias deinde et Hieremias cum lamentatione et epistula, sed et Daniel et Ezechiel et Iob et Hester uiginti duum librorum numerum consumment. quibusdam autem uisum est, additis Tobia et Iudith uiginti quattuor libros secundum numerum graecarum litterarum connumerare, Romana quoque lingua media inter Hebraeos Graecosque collecta; quia his maxime tribus linguis sacramentum uoluntatis dei et beati regni expectatio praedicatur: ex quo illud Pilati fuit, ut his tribus linguis regem Iudseorum dominum Iesum Christum esse praescriberet. nam quamuis multse barbarae gentes dei cognitionem secundum apostolorum praedicationem et manentium hodie illic ecclesiarum fidem adeptae sint, tamen specialiter euangelica doctrina in Romano imperio, sub quo Hebraei et Graeci continentur, consistit.
This is the reason why the law of the Old Testament is reckoned as twenty-two books, so that they may agree with the number of the letters. According to the traditions of the ancients they are counted thus: the books of Moses are five; Joshua son of Nun the sixth; Judges and Ruth the seventh; first and second Kingdoms the eighth; third and fourth make the ninth; the two of Chronicles the tenth; the words of the days of Ezra the eleventh; the book of Psalms is the twelfth; Solomon's Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, and Song of Songs the thirteenth, fourteenth, and fifteenth; the twelve minor Prophets the sixteenth; then Isaiah, and Jeremiah with Lamentations and the Letter, and also Daniel, Ezekiel, Job, and Esther complete the number of twenty-two books. Some, however, have seen fit to add Tobit and Judith and count twenty-four books, according to the number of the Greek letters, the Roman tongue also being gathered in between the Hebrews and the Greeks; for in these three languages above all the mystery of God's will and the expectation of the blessed kingdom are proclaimed. From this came Pilate's act of writing in these three languages that the Lord Jesus Christ is king of the Jews. For although many barbarian nations have attained the knowledge of God through the apostles' preaching and the faith of the churches that remain there today, yet the gospel teaching is established especially in the Roman Empire, under which the Hebrews and Greeks are included.
0.16CSEL 22:13–14
Consequens autem est, secundum octonarium hunc uiginti et duarum ogdoadum numerum eum, qui subiectus est in quindecim canticis graduum, psalmorum numerum contueri. post perfectam enim illam praecedentium ogdoadum doctrinam hoc canticum graduum in quindecim psalmos ex duobus perfectis numeris oportuit conuenire, hebdomade scilicet et ogdoade, id est septimo et octauo numero. namque per obseruantiam legis, quae in hebdomade est constituta, et euangelicum profectum, qui ogdoadis et praesenti religione et sperata expectatione perficitur, hoc cantico graduum in caelestia et aeterna conscenditur. nam et in templum per hunc numerum graduum principes sacerdotum in sanctorum sancta scandebant: ut, quia neque hebdomas legis sine euangeliorum ogdoade, neque ogdoas euangeliorum sine legis hebdomade uirum posset praestare perfectum, quisque perfecte credidisset perfectum hunc uerumque, qui in quindecim graduum cantico est, hebdomadis et ogdoadis numerum. ille in his perfectis et beatis et sanctis sanctorum locaretur.
It follows that after this eightfold number of twenty-two eights we should consider the number of psalms that comes next, in the fifteen Songs of Ascents. For after that perfect teaching of the preceding eights, this Song of Ascents had to come together into fifteen psalms from two perfect numbers, the seven and the eight, that is, the seventh and the eighth number. For through the observance of the law, which is established in the seven, and the progress of the gospel, which is completed by the eight both in present religion and in hoped-for expectation, one climbs by this Song of Ascents to heavenly and eternal things. For by this number of steps the chief priests used to go up in the temple into the holy of holies, so that, since neither the seven of the law without the eight of the gospels, nor the eight of the gospels without the seven of the law, could produce a perfect man, whoever had believed perfectly this perfect and true number of seven and eight that is in the fifteen Songs of Ascents might be placed in these perfect, blessed, and holy of holies.
0.17CSEL 22:14–15
Quamquam uero haec a nobis secundum numeros et legis obseruatione conplacitos et in sacramento euangelico distributos ita dicta sint, tamen absolute uniuscuiusque numeri uirtutem ex superscriptionibus psalmorum et dictorum ipsorum intellegentia consequemur. sunt autem superscriptionum omnium tituli diuersi. nam praeter eos, qui auctorum suorum nominibus aut causarum uel temporum significationibus praenotantur, sunt alii, quibus titulus in finem est; alii, quibus tantum psalmus cantici, uel canticum psalmi: et necesse est diuersas causas diuersarum superscriptionum extitisse. non enim sine causa tanta rerum diuersitate hic titulorum ordo conuertitur, ut nunc in finem, nunc psalmus, nunc canticum, nunc canticum psalmi, nunc psalmus cantici ad distinctionem psalmi, qui subiacet, praeferatur. et quamquam in singulis quibusque psalmis singularum quarumque inscriptionum causas praestare nitamur, tamen ad conpendium studiosae intellegentiae in breuem sermunculum uirtutem superscriptionum omnium coartamus.
Although we have said these things according to numbers pleasing in the observance of the law and distributed in the gospel mystery, yet we shall attain the power of each number in full from the headings of the psalms and from the understanding of what they say. The titles of all the headings are different. For besides those marked with the names of their authors or with indications of causes or times, there are others whose title is "for the end"; others with only "a psalm of a song" or "a song of a psalm"; and there must have been different reasons for the different headings. For it is not without reason that the order of titles changes with such variety, so that now "for the end," now "a psalm," now "a song," now "a song of a psalm," now "a psalm of a song" is placed in front to distinguish the psalm beneath. And although we shall try to give the reasons for each inscription in each psalm, yet for the convenience of the attentive reader we compress the meaning of all the headings into a short discourse.
0.18CSEL 22:15
Finis est, cuius causa cetera sunt; ipsum autem nulli alii causam suam praestat. ob finem enim omnia, nihil uero aliud post finem. namque ad finem tenditur et ad finem desinitur. ita finis et anteriorum perfectio est et ex se nihil in aliquid aliud protendens propria in semet sui ipsa possessio est. psalmi igitur, qui inscribentur in finem, ita intellegendi sunt, ut ex perfectis atque absolutis bonorum aeternorum doctrinis et spebus existant: quia ad ea, quse in his dicentur, fidei se nostrse cursus extendat et in his, nullo ulteriore procursu, ipso suo optatae et adeptae beatitudinis fine requiescat.
The end is that for whose sake the other things exist, while it gives its own cause to nothing else. For all things are for the sake of the end, but nothing comes after the end. One strives toward the end and ceases at the end. So the end is the completion of what goes before and, reaching out from itself to nothing further, is its own possession in itself. The psalms inscribed "for the end," then, are to be understood as arising from the perfect and complete teachings and hopes of eternal goods, because the course of our faith reaches out to what is said in them and, with no further advance, rests in them at the very end of the blessedness it longed for and has attained.
0.19CSEL 22:15–16
In musicis uero artibus hse sunt officiorum et generum uarietates. psalmus est, cum cessante uoce pulsus tantum organi concinentis auditur. can ti cum est, cum cantantium chorus, libertate sua utens neque in consonum organi adstrictus obsequium, hymno canorae tantum uocis exultat. canticum autem psalmi est, cum organo praecinente subsequens et aemula organo uox chori canentis auditur, modos psalterii modulis uocis imitata. psalmus uero cantici est, cum choro ante cantante humanae cantionis hymno ars organi consonantis aptatur, uocisque modulis praecinentis pari psalterium suauitate modulatur. his ergo quattuor musicae artis generibus conpetentes singulis quibusque psalmis superscriptiones sunt coaptatae. ex uirtutibus autem psalmorum et ex ipsis doctrinae musicae diuersitatibus causa uniuscuiusque superscriptionis ostenditur.
In the musical arts these are the varieties of function and kind. A psalm is when the voice is silent and only the playing of the accompanying instrument is heard. A song is when the choir of singers, using its freedom and not bound to follow the harmony of the instrument, rejoices in a hymn of the melodious voice alone. A song of a psalm is when the instrument leads and the voice of the singing choir is heard following and rivalling the instrument, imitating the measures of the psaltery with the melodies of the voice. A psalm of a song is when the choir sings first and the art of the accompanying instrument is fitted to the hymn of human singing, and the psaltery plays with sweetness equal to the melodies of the leading voice. To these four kinds of musical art, then, the headings fitting to each psalm have been adapted. The reason for each heading is shown from the powers of the psalms and from the very differences of musical teaching.
0.20CSEL 22:16–17
In eo enim psalmo, in quo tantum psalmus inscribitur, fidelium operum et religiosorum gestorum aut doctrina aut confessio continetur, cum propheta commemorando, quae egerit, ad doctrinam nos gestorum similium instituit, motibus corporei organi nostri ad pios officiorum usus temperatis. at uero cum canticum tantum in titulo praeponitur, scientia in eo spiritalis et intellegentia caelestis arcani, quam quis per cognitionem sapientiae consequitur, existit: cum non commemoratis fidei operibus solam doctrinam perfectae de deo cognitionis ostendit. non enim statim omnis scientia in bono opere est; neque rursum omne opus bonum ueram scientiam consequitur. ob quod est et illud, quod in tertio superscriptionum genere est, canticum psalmi, cum bonorum operum efficientise scientiae doctrina coniungitur. prius enim in bonis operibus uiuendum est, ut perfecta possit ea, quae deinceps succedet, diuini sacramenti esse cognitio, secundum id quod dictum est: desiderasti sapientiam? serua mandata, et dominus praestabit tibi eandem. praestat ergo dominus sapientiam his, qui per meritum operum gratiam intellegentise consequuntur. ex his igitur operum doctrinaeque studiis psalmi illius, qui canticum psalmi superscribitur, erit causa noscenda. ubi autem est psalmus cantici. illic per cognitionis scientiam usus boni operis tractatur, cum quando desiderabilem nobis fidelium gestorum efficientiam praestet anterior de deo adepta cognitio.
In the psalm headed only "a psalm," there is teaching or confession of faithful works and religious deeds, when the prophet, by recalling what he has done, instructs us to do similar deeds, the movements of the instrument of our body being tuned to the godly uses of duty. But when only "a song" is set in the title, there is in it spiritual knowledge and understanding of the heavenly secret, which one attains through the knowledge of wisdom, since, without recalling works of faith, it displays only the teaching of the perfect knowledge of God. For not all knowledge is at once in good work, nor again does every good work attain true knowledge. For this reason there is also the third kind of heading, "a song of a psalm," when the teaching of knowledge is joined to the accomplishment of good works. For one must first live in good works, so that the knowledge of the divine mystery that follows may be perfect, according to what is said: "Do you desire wisdom? Keep the commandments, and the Lord will grant it to you." The Lord therefore grants wisdom to those who attain the grace of understanding through the merit of works. From these pursuits of works and teaching, then, the reason for the psalm headed "a song of a psalm" is to be known. But where it is "a psalm of a song," there the practice of good work is treated through the knowledge of understanding, when knowledge of God gained beforehand gives us the accomplishment of faithful deeds, which we should desire.
0.21CSEL 22:17
Haec igitur musicae artis quadrifaria diuersitas psalmorum est diuersitatibus coaptata: ut psalmus per corporei organi motum in commemoratione gestorum sit, canticum uero per sapientiae cognitionem habeat in se doctrinae scientiam; canticum uero psalmi est, cum praecunti gestorum merito cognitio scientiae praestatur, psalmus deinde cantici, cum per adeptae scientiae cognitionem fidelium gestorum opera inchoatur et geritur. per has ergo superscriptionum proprietates intellegentiam psalmorum quaeri oportebit, quia unicuique generi prophetise in proprietate titulorum unumquodque genus musicae conparationis aptatum est. eos uero, qui sine inscriptione ulla significationis alicuius habeantur, ut est primus et secundus et ceteri conplures alii, intellegendum est ex doctrina spiritus sancti ad spiritalem cognitionem generalis scientiae fuisse cantatos, ut unusquisque ex his secundum fidei suse sinceritatem rationem intellegentise spiritalis expeteret.
This fourfold variety of musical art, then, has been fitted to the varieties of the psalms: "psalm" concerns the recalling of deeds through the movement of the instrument of the body; "song" contains the knowledge of teaching through the knowledge of wisdom; "song of a psalm" is when knowledge is granted through the merit of deeds going before; and "psalm of a song" is when the work of faithful deeds is begun and carried on through the knowledge of understanding already attained. Through these properties of the headings, then, the understanding of the psalms will have to be sought, because to each kind of prophecy one kind of musical comparison has been fitted in the property of the titles. But those that have no inscription of any meaning, such as the first, the second, and many others, are to be understood as sung from the teaching of the Holy Spirit for the spiritual knowledge of general learning, so that each person might seek from them the reasoning of spiritual understanding according to the sincerity of his faith.
0.22CSEL 22:17–18
Aliae uero superscriptiones, quae aut res gestas secundum historiam significant, aut tempora, aut dies, aut aliud aliquid conplexae sunt, uel ex interpretatione nominum, uel ex comparatione gestorum, uel ex consimilium specie, ex quibus rebus psalmus consistat, ostendunt: ut, sicubi est pro die sabbati, aut pro occultis filii, autpro die octaua, percorporalem superscriptionum significationem spiritalis psalmi intellegatur editio; uel, cum illius Dauid, uel illi Dauid, uel Abessalon, uel Saul, uel Doec in titulo sub gestorum historia praenotantur, in eo aut per pronominum qualitates, ut illi uel illius Dauid, aut per nominum uirtutes, ut est in Abessalon et Saul et Doec, prophetiam, quae in psalmo sit, consequamur.
Other headings, which signify historical events, or times, or days, or include something else, show what the psalm consists of, either from the interpretation of names, or from comparison of deeds, or from the likeness of similar things. So, where there is "for the sabbath day," or "for the hidden things of the son," or "for the eighth day," the issue of the spiritual psalm is understood through the bodily meaning of the headings; or when "of that David" or "to that David," or Absalom, or Saul, or Doeg are noted in the title under the history of events, we may grasp the prophecy that is in the psalm either through the qualities of the pronouns, as "to that" or "of that David," or through the powers of the names, as in Absalom, Saul, and Doeg.
0.23CSEL 22:18
Diapsalma uero, quod interiectum plurimis psalmis est, cognoscendum est, demutationem aut personae aut sensus sub conuersione modi musici inchoari: ut, sicubi diapsalma intercesserit, aut aliquid aliud dici, aut etiam ab altero dici, aut in altero artis music» modulo cantari intellegendum sit. et de personis ac sensibus, ubi diapsalma intercedere reperiemus, rationem adferre temptabimus. ceterum modi musici disciplinam conseruare translatio graeca et latina non potuit. hsec autem in conpendiosam breuitatem festinus ad ipsam psalmorum expositionem sermo collegit.
As for the diapsalma, which is inserted in very many psalms, one should know that it marks the beginning of a change either of person or of sense, with a change of musical mode: so that wherever a diapsalma comes in, it is to be understood that either something else is said, or it is said by someone else, or it is sung in another measure of musical art. And we shall try to give an account of the persons and senses where we find a diapsalma coming in. But the Greek and Latin translation could not preserve the discipline of musical mode. These things, then, my discourse has gathered into a short summary, hastening to the exposition of the psalms themselves.
0.24CSEL 22:18–19
Est autem diligens perpensumque iudicium expositioni psalmi uniuscuiusque praestandum, ut cognoscatur, qua unusquisque eorum claue intellegentise aperiendus sit. nam liber omnis similis est urbi pulchrae atque magnae, cui plures aedes diuersaeque sint, quarum fores propriis clauibus diuersisque claudantur: quae cum unum in locum congestae permixtaeque sunt, uolenti unamquamque aedem aperire maximam ignaro adferant difficultatem, ut clauem uniuscuiusque aedis inueniat: sitque aut familiaris scientiae, cognitam clauem cito ex copia illa congestae in unum uarietatis eligere, aut ingentis laboris, aptam et congruam clauem aperiendi uniuscuiusque aditus inuenire, quia ratio et qualitas non sinat, non suas claues claustris disparibus coaptare. itaque secundum domini misericordiam aperiendi uniuscuiusque psalmi clauem reperturi huius ipsius primi psalmi aditum propria sua et congrua claue pandamus.
Careful and well-weighed judgment must be given to the exposition of each psalm, so that it may be known with what key of understanding each of them is to be opened. For every book is like a beautiful and great city with many different houses, whose doors are closed with their own different keys. When these keys are heaped together and mixed in one place, they cause the greatest difficulty to someone ignorant who wants to open each house, to find the key of each house. It belongs either to familiar knowledge quickly to pick out the known key from that heap of variety, or to great labour to find the fit and suitable key for opening each entrance, since reason and nature do not allow keys that are not their own to be fitted to unmatched locks. So, by the Lord's mercy, as we seek the key for opening each psalm, let us lay open the entrance of this first psalm with its own proper and suitable key.
Tractates 1
1.1CSEL 22:19–20
PSALMUS PRIMUS. Principalis haec in psalmis intellegentia est, ex cuius persona, uel in quem ea, quse dicta sint, intellegi oporteant, posse discernere. non enim uniformis et indiscreta eorum est constitutio, ut non et auctores habeant et genera diuersa. inuenimus enim in his frequenter personam dei patris solere proponi, ut in octogesimo et octauo psalmo, cum dicitur: exal taui electum de plebe mea. inueni Dauid seruum meum, in oleo sancto unxi eum. ipse inuocabit me: pater mese es tu et susceptor salutis meae. et ego primogenitum ponam eum, excelsum super omnes reges terrae. personam uero filii in plurimis fere introduci, ut in septimo decimo: populus, quem non cognoui, seruiuit mihi; et in uicesimo primo: diuiserunt uestimenta mea sibi et super uestem meam miseruntsortem. nunc autem primum hunc psalmum uel ex persona patris, uel ex persona filii non posse intellegi, res ipsa abso- Inte docet: sed in lege domini fuit uoluntas eius, et in lege eius meditabitur die ac nocte. in eo enim psalmo, in quo personam patris designari meminimus, propria et apta memorantur, cum dicitur: ipse inuocabit: pater meus es tu, deus meus, et susceptor salutis meae. et in eo, in quo filius loqui docetur, ipse se ex his, quse commemorat, dictorum suorum profitetur auctorem. dicens: populus, quem non cognoui, seruiuit mihi. dum enim et pater dicit: ipse inuocabit me et filius ait: populus seruiuit mihi, ipsos se esse, qui de se loquantur, ostendunt. at uero nunc cum dicitur: sed lege domini fuit uoluntas eius, nulla domini persona de se loquentis ostenditur. sed alterius potius, beatitudinem eius scilicet uiri, cuius in lege domini, uoluntas sit, praedicantis. persona itaque prophetse, cuius ore spiritus sanctus loquatur, nunc esse noscenda est officio oris eius ad cognitionem nos sacramenti spiritalis erudiens.
Psalm One. The chief point of understanding in the psalms is to be able to discern in whose person, or with reference to whom, what is said ought to be understood. For their composition is not uniform and undifferentiated, as though they did not have both different authors and different kinds. We often find in them that the person of God the Father is presented, as in the eighty-eighth psalm, when it is said: "I have exalted one chosen from my people; I have found David my servant, with holy oil I have anointed him. He will call upon me: You are my Father and the upholder of my salvation. And I will make him the firstborn, high above all the kings of the earth." The person of the Son, on the other hand, is introduced in very many, as in the seventeenth: "A people whom I did not know has served me"; and in the twenty-first: "They divided my garments among them, and for my clothing they cast lots." But the matter itself plainly teaches that this first psalm cannot be understood either in the person of the Father or in the person of the Son: "But his will was in the law of the Lord, and in his law he will meditate day and night." For in the psalm in which we noted the person of the Father to be indicated, things proper and fitting to him are mentioned, when it is said: "He will call upon me: You are my Father, my God, and the upholder of my salvation." And in the one in which the Son is shown to speak, he declares himself, from what he recounts, the author of his own words, saying: "A people whom I did not know has served me." For when the Father says, "He will call upon me," and the Son says, "A people has served me," they show that they themselves are the ones speaking of themselves. But now, when it is said, "But his will was in the law of the Lord," no person of the Lord speaking of himself is shown, but rather that of another, proclaiming the blessedness of the man whose will is in the law of the Lord. So the person here is to be recognized as that of the prophet, through whose mouth the Holy Spirit speaks, instructing us by the service of his mouth in the knowledge of the spiritual mystery.
1.2CSEL 22:20–21
Et cum hsec loquatur, quaerendum est, de quo uiro eum loqui intellegere debeamus. ait enim: beatus uir, qui non abiit in consilio impiorum et in uia peccatorum non stetit et in cathedra pestilentiae non sedit. sed in lege domini fuit uoluntas eius, et in lege eius meditabitur die ac nocte. et erit tamquam lignum, quod plantatum est secus decursus aquarum, quod fructum suum dabit in tempore suo. et folium eius nou decidet: et omnia, quserendum faciet, bene dirigentur. multos uel praesenti sermone uel ex litteris ac scriptis eorum conperi ita sensisse de psalmo hoc, quod significari in eo dominus noster Iesus Christus intellegi debeat, cuius beatitudo in his, quse subiecta sunt, prsedicetur. sed id nec modo, nec ratione docuerunt; bonae quidem opinionis affectu, quia omnis ad eum prophetia est referenda psalmorum: sed ubi et quando ad eum prophetise ipsius sermo se referat, rationabilis scientiae discernendum est ueritate.
Since he says these things, we must ask of what man we ought to understand him to speak. For he says: "Blessed is the man who has not walked in the counsel of the ungodly, nor stood in the way of sinners, nor sat in the chair of pestilence; but his will was in the law of the Lord, and in his law he will meditate day and night. And he will be like a tree that is planted by the streams of waters, which will give its fruit in its season; and its leaf will not fall, and all things whatever he does will prosper." I have found that many, either in present discourse or from their writings, have thought of this psalm that our Lord Jesus Christ should be understood to be signified in it, whose blessedness is proclaimed in what follows. But they taught this neither with measure nor with reason; they did so from a well-meant opinion, since all the prophecy of the psalms is to be referred to him; but where and when the language of the prophecy refers to him must be discerned by the truth of reasoned knowledge.
1.3CSEL 22:21–22
Ea autem, quse in exordio psalmi posita sunt, minime personse eius dignitatique conueniunt; et incautam hanc ita prsedicandi facilitatem ipsa illa coarguunt, quae continentur in psalmo. cum enim dicitur: et in lege domini fuit uoluntas eius, cum lex per dei filium lata sit, quomodo ad eum ob id beatitudo referetur, quia uoluntas eius in lege domini fuerit, cum dominus ipse sit legis? quod autem lex eius sit, in psalmo septuagesimo et septimo ipse testatur, quo ait: adtendite, populus meus, in legem meam, inclinate aurem uestram in uerba oris mei. aperiam in parabola os meum. et haec Matthseus euangelista ab ipso dicta esse confirmat, dicens: ideo in parabolis loquebatur, ut inpleretur quod dictum est: aperiam in parabolis os meum. prophetiam ergo suam dominus rebus inpleuit. nam in his, in quibus locuturum se spoponderat, parabolis est locutus. id autem quod ait:' et erit tamquam lignum, quod plantatum est secus decursus aquarum - in quo conparatiue beatitudinis profectus quomodo personse eius poterit coaptari, ut sit dei filio plantatum lignum beatius, ob quod beatus sit, quia aliquando similitudinem eius profectu beatitudinis consequatur? dehinc cum secundum Sapientiam et apostolum et ante saecula et ante tempora aeterna sit et primogenitus omnis creaturse sit, et in ipso et per ipsum creata sint omnia, quomodo his rebus cum fiet similis, beatus est, quse ab ipso sint instituta? cum neque creatoris uirtus ad beatitudinis suse perfectionem conparatione egeat creaturse, neque primogeniti antiquitas in eo, quod erit tamquam lignum, tempus praeposterae conparationis admittat. id enim, quod erit per expectandum adhuc tempus, non potest uideri ut aut fuerit, aut iam sit in rerum natura. quidquid autem iam est, non eget dilatione temporis, ut ad id, quod erit, inchoetur, quia antiquitate exordii sui esse iam permanet.
The things placed at the opening of the psalm do not at all suit his person and dignity, and the very things contained in the psalm refute this careless readiness to proclaim it so. For when it is said, "And his will was in the law of the Lord," since the law was given through the Son of God, how will blessedness be ascribed to him because his will was in the law of the Lord, when he himself is the Lord of the law? That the law is his he himself testifies in the seventy-seventh psalm, where he says: "Attend, my people, to my law; incline your ear to the words of my mouth. I will open my mouth in a parable." And the evangelist Matthew confirms that these words were spoken by him, saying: "Therefore he spoke in parables, that what was said might be fulfilled: I will open my mouth in parables." So the Lord fulfilled his own prophecy in deed, for he spoke in the parables in which he had promised he would speak. And as for the words, "And he will be like a tree that is planted by the streams of waters," in which an advance in blessedness by comparison is expressed, how could that be fitted to his person, as though a planted tree were more blessed than the Son of God, so that he is blessed because at some time, by an advance in blessedness, he attains its likeness? Again, since according to Wisdom and the apostle he is before the ages and before eternal times, and is the firstborn of all creation, and in him and through him all things were created, how is he blessed when he becomes like things that were established by him? For neither does the power of the Creator need comparison with a creature for the perfection of his blessedness, nor does the antiquity of the firstborn admit, in the words "he will be like a tree," the time of a backward comparison. For what will be, through a time still to be awaited, cannot be thought either to have been or to be already in the nature of things. But whatever already is does not need delay of time to begin toward what will be, since it already remains in being by the antiquity of its beginning.
1.4CSEL 22:22
Itaque quia haec a diuinitate unigeniti dei filii domini nostri Iesu Christi intelleguntur aliena, uir ille hic a propheta beatus praedicari opinandus est, qui se ei corpori, quod dominus adsumpsit, in quo homo natus est, conformem studio aequitatis et totius iustitiae perfectione praestiterit. et sane id ita intellegi oportere, plenior psalmi expositio monstrabit.
Since, then, these things are understood to be foreign to the divinity of the only-begotten Son of God, our Lord Jesus Christ, the man whom the prophet proclaims blessed here is to be thought of as the one who, by zeal for equity and the perfection of all righteousness, has made himself conformed to that body which the Lord assumed, in which he was born as man. And that it ought to be understood so, the fuller exposition of the psalm will show.
1.5CSEL 22:22–23
Speciosissimum autem hoc et dignissimum incipiendorum psalmorum sanctus spiritus sumpsit exordium, ut humanam infirmitatem per spem beatitudinis ad innocens religionis studium adhortaretur, ut sacramentum dei corporati doceret, ut communionem glorise? caelestis polliceretur, ut poenam iudicii denuntiaret, ut differentiam resurrectionis ostenderet, ut prouidentiam dei in retributione monstraret. perfecta scilicet consummataque ratione tantse prophetise ordinem inchoauit, ut hominum inbecillitatem ad fidei studium beati uiri spes inliceret, spei beatitudinem conparata ligni beatitudo sponderet, insolentem impietatem intra metum denuntiata impiis seueritas coherceret, meriti differentiam in consiliis sanctorum condicionis ordo distingueret, dei magnificentiam in cognoscendis iustorun» uiis sequitas constituta monstraret. sed res ipsas et earum uerba tractemus.
The Holy Spirit took this most beautiful and most worthy opening for beginning the psalms, in order to exhort human weakness, through the hope of blessedness, to the innocent pursuit of religion; to teach the mystery of God made flesh; to promise fellowship in heavenly glory; to announce the punishment of judgment; to show the difference in the resurrection; and to display the providence of God in recompense. With perfect and complete reasoning he began the order of so great a prophecy, so that the hope of the blessed man might draw human weakness to the pursuit of faith; the blessedness of the tree, by comparison, might pledge the blessedness of the hope; the severity announced to the ungodly might restrain insolent ungodliness by fear; the order of condition in the counsels of the saints might distinguish the difference of merit; and the equity established in recognizing the ways of the righteous might show the greatness of God. But let us treat the things themselves and their words.
1.6CSEL 22:23
Beatus uir, qui non abiit in consilio impiorum et in uia peccatorum non stetit et in cathedra pestilentiae non sedit. sed in lege domini fuit uoluntas eius, et in lege eius meditabitur die ac nocte. quinque generum obseruantiam beato uiro subesse propheta commemorat: primam in impiorum consilio non eundi, alteram in peccatorum uia non consistendi, tertiam in cathedra pestilentiae non sedendi, tum deinde uoluntatis in lege domini ponendae, postremo in ea die noctuque meditandi. ergo necesse est differre impium a peccatore, peccatorem a pestilente; maxime cum sit impiis consilium, peccatori uia, cathedra pestilenti. dehinc cum in consilio impiorum eatur potius quam stetur, in uia uero peccatoris stetur magis quam eatur. quarum rerum causas ut intellegere possimus, discernendum est, quanto differat peccator ab impio, ut per id intellegi possit, cur peccatori uia. et impio consilium deputetur; dehinc cur et in uia standum et in consilio eundum sit, cum humana consuetudo et in consilio standum et in uia eundum esse decernat. non omnis, qui peccator est, et impius est: impius autem non potest non esse peccator. et sumamus ex usu conscientise communis exemplum. patres suos amare possunt filii, licet ebriosi sint et lasciui et prodigi; et inter haec uitia carent impietate, qui non carent crimine. impii uero, licet in praecipuis sint continentiae frugalitatisque uirtutibus, omne tamen, quodcumque aliud extra impietatem erit crimen, in contumelia parentis excedunt.
"Blessed is the man who has not walked in the counsel of the ungodly, nor stood in the way of sinners, nor sat in the chair of pestilence; but his will was in the law of the Lord, and in his law he will meditate day and night." The prophet records that the blessed man keeps five kinds of observance: first, not walking in the counsel of the ungodly; second, not standing in the way of sinners; third, not sitting in the chair of pestilence; then setting his will in the law of the Lord; and finally meditating in it day and night. It must be, then, that the ungodly man differs from the sinner, and the sinner from the pestilent, especially since counsel belongs to the ungodly, a way to the sinner, and a chair to the pestilent; and further, since one walks rather than stands in the counsel of the ungodly, but stands rather than walks in the way of the sinner. To understand the reasons for these things, we must discern how far the sinner differs from the ungodly, so that it may be understood why a way is assigned to the sinner and counsel to the ungodly, and then why one stands in the way and walks in the counsel, when human custom decrees that one stands in counsel and walks on a way. Not everyone who is a sinner is also ungodly, but the ungodly man cannot fail to be a sinner. Let us take an example from common experience. Sons can love their fathers even if they are drunkards, lustful, and prodigal; and amid these vices those who are not free of crime are free of impiety. But the impious, even if they excel in the virtues of self-control and frugality, still go beyond every other crime that lies outside impiety when they insult a parent.
1.7CSEL 22:23–24
Igitur secundum hoc propositum exemplum impium discerni a peccatore non dubium est. et impios quidem eos esse natura ipsa iudicii communis ostendit, qui cognitionem dei expetere fastidiunt, qui nullum esse mundi creatorem inreligiosa opinione praesumunt, qui mundum in hunc habitum ornatumque fortuitis motibus constitisse commemorant, qui, ne quod iudicium creatori suo ob uitam recte criminoseue gestam relinquant, uolunt ex naturae necessitate se nasci et ex eadem rursum necessitate dissolui. horum igitur omne consilium fluctuans, incertum ac uagum est et in isdem ac per eadem sine ulla consistendi statione differtur; non enim tenet modum definitionis alicuius. creatorem mundi disputatio docere ausa non est. cum enim quaeras, cur mundus et quando et in quantum? et utrum mundus homini, an homo mundo? et mors ob quid, uel quo usque, uel qualis? circa hsec impietatis suae consilia agitur semper et uadit, loco consistendi in his consiliis non reperto.
According to the example given, then, there is no doubt that the ungodly is distinguished from the sinner. The very nature of common judgment shows that the ungodly are those who disdain to seek the knowledge of God; who with irreligious opinion presume that there is no creator of the world; who say that the world came to its present form and order by chance motions; who, so as to leave no judgment to their creator for a life lived rightly or criminally, want to be born from the necessity of nature and to be dissolved again by the same necessity. All their counsel, then, is fluctuating, uncertain, and wandering, and is carried about in the same things and through the same things without any place of standing; for it holds to no limit of definition. Their argument has not dared to teach a creator of the world. For when you ask why the world exists, and when, and how great it is; and whether the world is for man or man for the world; and why death exists, or how far it reaches, or what kind it is, the counsels of their ungodliness are always tossed about these questions and keep going, finding no place to stand in these counsels.
1.8CSEL 22:24
Sunt et alia consilia impiorum, eorum scilicet, qui in haeresim delapsi nec noui nec ueteris Testamenti legibus continentur. quorum sermo in orbem semper et circulum erroris inflexus, nihil tenens et in nullo consistens indefinitse sententiae cursu recursuque iactatur. quorum impietatis est, deum non ex dei ipsius professione sed ex arbitrii sui uoluntate metiri; ignorantes non minoris impietatis esse, deum fingere, quam negare; a quibus cum requiras, quo spei ac fidei suse fine sic sentiant, confunduntur, perturbantur, dissimulant, circumerrant et finem ipsum eius, dequa quaeritur, disputationis euitant. beatus ergo uir est, qui in hoc impiorum consilio non abiit, id est, qui ipsam illam in hoc consilio eundi non admiserit uoluntatem: quia quae impia sunt, uel cogitasse iam crimen sit.
There are also other counsels of the ungodly, namely of those who have fallen into heresy and are held by the laws of neither the New nor the Old Testament. Their speech, bent always into a ring and circle of error, holding nothing and standing on nothing, is tossed back and forth in the course of undefined opinion. Their ungodliness lies in measuring God not by God's own declaration but by the wish of their own judgment, not knowing that it is no less ungodly to invent God than to deny him. When you ask them with what end of hope and faith they think this, they are confused, disturbed, they dissemble, they wander about and avoid the very end of the argument that is being asked about. Blessed, then, is the man who has not walked in this counsel of the ungodly, that is, who has not admitted even the wish to walk in this counsel, because to have even thought what is ungodly is already a crime.
1.9CSEL 22:24–25
Sequens autem est, ut qui in impiorum consilio non abiit, in peccatorum quoque uia non stet. plures enim sunt, qui, cum. per confessionem dei ab impietate discreti sint, non tamen a peccato per id liberi sint, in ecclesia quidem manentes, sed ecclesiae disciplinam non tenentes: ut auari, ebriosi, tumultuosi, procaces, superbi, simulatores, mendaces, rapaces. et ad haec quidem nos uitia naturae nostrae propellit instinctus; sed utile est, nos uia hac, ad quam ferimur, abscedere, neque consistere illic, adhibito decedendi ex ea non moroso recursu. et idcirco beatus uir est, qui in uia peccatorum non stetit, natura quidem in uiam hanc deferente, sed ex uia hac fidei religione referente.
It follows that one who has not walked in the counsel of the ungodly should also not stand in the way of sinners. For there are many who, though separated from ungodliness by confessing God, are not thereby free from sin; they remain in the church but do not keep the church's discipline: the greedy, drunkards, the quarrelsome, the insolent, the proud, hypocrites, liars, robbers. The impulse of our nature drives us to these vices; but it is profitable for us to depart from this way into which we are carried, and not to stand there, but to make a prompt return and leave it. And for this reason blessed is the man who has not stood in the way of sinners, his nature carrying him down into this way, but the devotion of faith bringing him back from it.
1.10CSEL 22:25–26
Tertius quoque hic obtinendae beatitudinis ordo est, in cathedra pestilentiae non sedere. sederunt in cathedra Moysi pharissei docentes, sedit et Pilatus in tribunali: cuius itaque cathedrae sessionem existimabimus pestilentem? non utique Moysi. domino sedentes potius quam sessionem cathedrae inprobante, cum dicit: super cathedram, inquit, Moysi sederunt scribse et pharissei; quaecumque dixerint facite. quse autem faciunt, facere nolite. cathedrae huius sessio pestilens non est, cuius oboedientia dominica auctoritate praecipitur. illa ergo erit pestilens. cuius contagium Pilatus manus abluendo deuitat. multos enim etiam in metu dei constitutos saecularium tamen honorum ambitio corrumpit: et uolunt ecclesise legibus subditi fori legibus iudicare. sed quamquam ad haec ipsa officia, quse agunt, ferant secum religiosam uoluntatem. beniuolos sese continentesque praestando, tamen necesse est eorum, in quibus deuersabuntur, negotiorum quodam pestilenti contagio polluantur. publicarum enim causarum ordo manere eos uolentes etiam in ecclesiasticae legis sanctitate non patitur. et quamuis religiosi propositi tenaces sint, tamen per necessitatem sedis obtentse tum ad contumeliam, tum ad iniuriam, tum ad p“nam cunctante licet uoluntate coguntur, facitque eos necessitas necessitatis ipsius esse participes, cum tamquam lue morbida imbuuntur. et idcirco hanc eorum cathedram cathedram pestilentiae propheta cognominat, quia contagione sua etiam uoluntatem religiosae mentis inficiat.
The third step in obtaining blessedness is not to sit in the chair of pestilence. The Pharisees sat teaching in the chair of Moses; Pilate too sat on the judgment seat. Whose chair, then, shall we judge the sitting in to be pestilent? Certainly not that of Moses, since the Lord condemned those who sat rather than the sitting in the chair, when he said: "The scribes and Pharisees have sat on the chair of Moses; whatever they tell you, do; but what they do, do not do." The sitting in this chair is not pestilent, since obedience to it is commanded by the Lord's authority. That chair, then, will be pestilent whose contagion Pilate avoids by washing his hands. For ambition for worldly honours corrupts many who are established even in the fear of God, and though subject to the laws of the church they wish to judge by the laws of the forum. And although they bring a religious will with them to the very duties they perform, showing themselves kindly and restrained, they must still be polluted by a kind of pestilent contagion from the affairs in which they are engaged. For the order of public business does not allow them, however much they wish, to remain in the holiness of church law. And though they hold firmly to their religious purpose, yet through the necessity of the seat they have obtained they are compelled, however reluctant their will, now to insult, now to injury, now to punishment; and necessity makes them sharers in that very necessity, as they are infected as if with a diseased plague. And for this reason the prophet calls their chair the chair of pestilence, because by its contagion it infects even the will of a religious mind.
1.11CSEL 22:26
Sed beatitudinem uiri nondum uel in impiorum consilio non isse, uel in peccatorum uia non stetisse, uel in pestilentiae cathedra non sedisse consummat. possunt enim haec et in saeculari uiro reperiri, ut unum deum esse creatorem mundi opinetur, ut a peccatis se per studium modestae innocentise referat, ut honorum dignitatibus priuatae et tranquillse uitae otia anteponat. sed perfectum nunc deo uirum propheta conformans, et quem in magnis aeternae beatitudinis constituat exemplis, non communibus eum ad id docet usurum esse uirtutibus, sed his consummandum esse, ut beatus sit, quse secuntur: sed in lege domini fuit uoluntas eius. abstentio superiorum inutilis est. nisi in consequentia adhibeatur intentio: scilicet ut in lege domini uoluntas sit. non expectat propheta, ut metus sit. plures enim intra legem metus cohibet, paucos uero uoluntas constituit in lege: quia timoris est, non audere timenda neglegere; perfectae uero religionis est, praescriptis uelle parere. et idcirco beatus ille est, cuius in dei lege non timor est, sed uoluntas.
But not having walked in the counsel of the ungodly, nor stood in the way of sinners, nor sat in the chair of pestilence does not yet complete the man's blessedness. For these things can be found even in a man of the world: he may hold that one God is the creator of the world, he may draw back from sins by the pursuit of modest innocence, he may prefer the leisure of a private and quiet life to the dignities of office. But the prophet, now shaping a man perfect for God, whom he sets among the great examples of eternal blessedness, teaches that he will not attain it with ordinary virtues but must be completed by the things that follow in order to be blessed: "But his will was in the law of the Lord." Abstaining from the former things is useless unless purpose is applied to what follows, namely that the will be in the law of the Lord. The prophet does not wait for fear to be present. For fear restrains many within the law, but will establishes few in the law; for it belongs to fear not to dare to neglect what is to be feared, but it belongs to perfect religion to wish to obey what is commanded. And for this reason that man is blessed in whom there is not fear but will in the law of God.
1.12CSEL 22:26–27
Sed deest interdum et aliquid uoluntati; et perfectam beatitudinem solum uelle non obtinet, nisi uoluntatem sequatur operatio. sequitur namque: et in lege eius meditabitur die a c nocte. beatum hunc uirum continua legis meditatio et indefessa consummat. sed forte id humanae infirmitatis natura non patitur, per quam quiescendum, dormiendum, cibo uacandum est; ob quae a spe consequendae beatitudinis etiam necessitate naturalium decidamus, cum quando a meditatione diurna atque nocturna negotii corporalis intercessione sit desinendum. simile quoque huic dicto apostoli dictum est: sine intermissione orate. quasi uero non occupanda in res suas naturae nostrae necessitas possit sine interpellatione temporis semper orare. meditatio itaque legis non solum in uerbis legendi est, sed in operis religione; neque ut libros tantum et scripturas recenseamus, sed ut ea, quae scripturis ac libris continentur, gestis rebusque meditemur, et diurna nocturnaque opera legem semper exerceant, ut illud apostoli est: omnia quaecumque facietis in gloriam dei, siue cum manducatis, siue cum bibitis, siue cum aliud agitis. per hoc enim efficitur, ut sine intermissione oremus, cum per opera deo placita et in gloriam eius semper exercitata sancti cuiusque uiri uita omnis oratio sit; ac sic secundum legem noctu dieque uiuendo uita ipsa nocturna legis erit et diurna meditatio.
But sometimes something is lacking even to the will, and merely willing does not obtain perfect blessedness unless action follows the will. For there follows: "And in his law he will meditate day and night." Continual and unwearied meditation on the law completes this blessed man. But perhaps the nature of human weakness does not allow it, since we must rest, sleep, and give time to food; and for this reason we might fall from the hope of attaining blessedness by the very necessity of natural things, since at times we must cease from meditation day and night when bodily business intervenes. Similar to this saying is the apostle's: "Pray without ceasing"; as though our nature, whose necessity must be occupied with its own affairs, could pray always without interruption of time. Meditation on the law, then, lies not only in the words of reading but in the devotion of action; not that we should only go over books and writings, but that we should meditate in deeds and actions on what is contained in the Scriptures and books, and that our works by day and night should always exercise the law, as the apostle says: "Whatever you do, do it to the glory of God, whether you eat or drink or do anything else." For in this way it comes about that we pray without ceasing, when through works pleasing to God and always done for his glory the whole life of every holy man becomes prayer; and so, by living according to the law night and day, life itself will be the night and day meditation on the law.
1.13CSEL 22:27–28
Sed consummata uiri huius beatitudine, qui impiorum consiliis et peccatorum uiis et pestilentiae cathedra se abstinens dei legem uolens die et nocte meditetur, docendum est, quantus ei fructus adquisitae huius beatitudinis sit futurus. uelle enim beatum esse ex beatitudinis ipsius expectatione proficiscitur. sequitur namque: et erit tamquam li gnum, quod plantatum est secus decursus aquarum, quod fructum suum dabit in tempore suo. et folium eius non decidet. ridiculum hoc forte et ineptum conparata? beatitudinis credetur exemplum: in quo ligni plantatio, decursus aquarum, fructuum datio, suum tempus et folium non decidens praedicatur. haec quidem secundum homines saeculi nulla forte existimabuntur. sed uideamus secundum propheticam doctrinam, quanta in his ipsis rebus ac uerbis conparatae beatitudinis gloria collocetur.
Now that the blessedness of this man has been completed, who abstains from the counsels of the ungodly, the ways of sinners, and the chair of pestilence, and willingly meditates on God's law day and night, we must teach how great a fruit of this acquired blessedness will be his. For the wish to be blessed proceeds from the expectation of blessedness itself. There follows: "And he will be like a tree that is planted by the streams of waters, which will give its fruit in its season; and its leaf will not fall." This example of blessedness by comparison may perhaps be thought ridiculous and silly, in which the planting of a tree, streams of waters, the giving of fruit, its season, and a leaf that does not fall are proclaimed. By the standards of men of the world these things will perhaps be thought nothing. But let us see, according to prophetic teaching, how great a glory of blessedness by comparison is placed in these very things and words.
1.14CSEL 22:28–29
In libro Genesis, ubi plantatum a deo paradisum legislator ostendit, omne quoque lignum specie pulchrum et ad esum bonum productum esse monstrauit; esse quoque et in medio paradiso lignum uitae et lignum sciendi boni et mali exposuit; inrigari deinde paradisum flumine, quod postea in quattuor principia diuisum sit. quod autem esset hoc lignum uitae, propheta Salomon docuit, dicens de adhortatione sapientise: lignum uitae est omnibus, qui conplectuntur eam et qui incumbunt in eam. lignum hoc ergo uiuens est; neque solum uiuens, sed etiam rationale; rationale autem in tantum, ut fructus det, det uero non confuse. non inportune, sed tempore suo. et plantatum hoc lignum est secus decursus aquarum. in possessione scilicet regni dei, id est in paradiso, et unde flumen exiens in quattuor principia diuiditur. non enim ait: post decursus aquarum, sed: secus decursus aquarum, unde primum decursum aquarum diuisiones sortiuntur. illic enim plantatum hoc lignum est, quo latronem illum, se dominum confitentem, dominus, qui sapientia est, introducit dicens: amen dico tibi, hodie mecum eris in paradiso. et quia sapientiam, quae Christus est, lignum uitae cognominari de sacramento futurae corporationis et passionis prophetica auctoritate docuimus. etiam ex euangeliis intellegentise huius est proprietas adstruenda. dominus namque ipse se arbori conparauit, cum in Beelzebul daemonia eum Iudsei eicere dixissent: aut facite, inquit, arborem bonam et fructus eius bonos, aut facite arborem malam et fructus eius malos; ei fructu enim arbor cognoscitur. quia cum fructus esset optimus daemonia eicere, Beelzebul eum, cuius fructus pessimi sunt, esse dicebant. huius quoque beati ligni non dedignatus est in se docere uirtutem, cum pergens ad crucem ait: quia si in humido ligno haec faciunt, in arido quid fiet? per humidi ligni exemplum nihil in se ariditati mortis obnoxium esse significans.
In the book of Genesis, where the lawgiver shows the paradise planted by God, he showed also that every tree beautiful in appearance and good for food was brought forth; he set out that there was also in the middle of paradise the tree of life and the tree of knowing good and evil; and that paradise was watered by a river, which afterwards was divided into four heads. What this tree of life is, the prophet Solomon taught, saying in his exhortation to wisdom: "She is a tree of life to all who embrace her and who lean upon her." This tree, then, is living; not only living, but also rational; rational so far as to give fruits, and to give them not confusedly, not out of season, but in its season. And this tree is planted by the streams of waters, in the possession of the kingdom of God, that is, in paradise, from which the river goes out and is divided into four heads. For he does not say "after the streams of waters" but "by the streams of waters," where the streams of waters first receive their divisions. For there this tree is planted, into which the Lord, who is Wisdom, brings that thief who confessed him as Lord, saying: "Truly I say to you, today you will be with me in paradise." And since we have taught by prophetic authority that Wisdom, who is Christ, is called the tree of life with reference to the mystery of his future taking of a body and his passion, the propriety of this understanding is also to be confirmed from the Gospels. For the Lord himself compared himself to a tree when the Jews had said he cast out demons by Beelzebul: "Either make the tree good and its fruit good, or make the tree bad and its fruit bad; for the tree is known by its fruit." For though casting out demons was the best of fruit, they were saying he was Beelzebul, whose fruits are the worst. Nor did he disdain to teach the power of this blessed tree in himself when, going to the cross, he said: "For if they do these things in the green wood, what will happen in the dry?", signifying by the example of the green wood that nothing in him was liable to the dryness of death.
1.15CSEL 22:29–31
Huic itaque ligno beatus ille uir similis fiet, cum, translati latronis in paradisum modo, secundum decursus aquarum et ipse plantetur: et fiet beata illa et non eradicanda nouella plantatio, quam in euangeliis dominus significat, cum de aliena plantatione conqueritur, dicens: omnis plantatio, quam non plantauit pater meus, eradicabitur. hoc ergo lignum dabit fructus suos. ubicumque autem de fructibus arborum aliquid diuinus sermo significat, facere potius eas fructum, quam dare memorat, cum ait: non potest arbor bona malos fructus facere, et cum secundum Esaiam querella de uinea est: expectaui, inquit, ut faceret uuas, fecit autem spinas. lignum autem hoc dabit fructus suos, arbitrio dandi et ratione moderatum. nam in tempore suo dabit. et quo tandem tempore? nempe eo, de quo beatus apostolus ait: ut notum fa ceret uobis sacramentum uoluntatis suae secundum placitum quod proposuit in ipso, in dispensatione plenitudinis temporum. hoc ergo dispensationis est tempus, quo et accipiendi et dandi oportunitas temperatur, cum suum erit tempus, ut accipiant quibus dabit. temporis autem mora in plenitudine temporum pendet. dispensatio enim dandi fructus plenitudini temporum reseruatur. et qui tandem hic dispendendus erit fructus? nempe ille, de quo idem apostolus meminit, dicens: et transformabit, inquit, corpus humilitatis nostrae conforme corpori gloriae suse. hos ergo nobis fructus suos dabit, quos iam in eo, quem sibi adsumpsit et qui significatur in ligno, homine perfecit, quem in inmortalitatis suae naturam absorpta mortalitate transfudit. erit ergo ut hoc lignum beatus ille uir, cum quando ipse in gloria dei domino suo conformis adstiterit.
To this tree, then, that blessed man will become like when, in the manner of the thief brought into paradise, he too is planted by the streams of waters; and he will become that blessed new planting that is not to be uprooted, which the Lord signifies in the Gospels when he complains of a planting not his own, saying: "Every planting that my Father has not planted will be uprooted." This tree, then, will give its fruits. Wherever the divine word signifies something about the fruits of trees, it speaks of them as making fruit rather than giving it, as when it says, "A good tree cannot make bad fruit," and when, in Isaiah, there is the complaint about the vineyard: "I waited for it to make grapes, but it made thorns." But this tree will give its fruits, governed by the judgment and reasoning of giving. For it will give in its season. And in what season? Surely the one of which the blessed apostle says: "That he might make known to you the mystery of his will, according to the good pleasure which he purposed in him, in the dispensation of the fullness of times." This, then, is the time of the dispensation, by which the opportunity both of receiving and of giving is regulated, when it will be its season for those to receive to whom it will give. The delay of time hangs on the fullness of times, for the dispensation of giving the fruit is reserved for the fullness of times. And what fruit will be dispensed here? Surely the one the same apostle mentions, saying: "And he will transform the body of our lowliness to be conformed to the body of his glory." These are the fruits he will give us, which he has already perfected in the man whom he assumed and who is signified in the tree, whom he transferred into the nature of his immortality when mortality was swallowed up. That blessed man, then, will be like this tree when he stands conformed to his Lord in the glory of God.
1.16CSEL 22:31
Folium autem ligni huius non defluet. nec mirum si folia eius non defluunt, cuius fructus dabuntur potius, quam decident, non maturitate depulsi, non ui exteriore decussi, sed rationalis officii dispensatione demensi. et quid in foliis significet, ex conparatione rerum corporalium absolutum est. namque hanc esse naturam foliorum contuemur, ut ad custodiam fructuum fructibus ipsis circumiecta prorumpant, ut quodam uallo tenera pomorum initia communiant. doctrina ergo uerborum dei, quae promissos nobis fructus conuestit, significatur in foliis. his enim uerbis spes nostrae inumbrantur, horum inter has saeculi tempestates munimine conteguntur. non defluent igitur haec folia, id est dei uerba; quia per dominum dictum est: cselum et terra prseteribunt, uerba autem mea non praeteribunt. nihil enim ex his, quse? a deo dicta sunt, dilabetur aut decidet.
And the leaf of this tree will not fall. No wonder its leaves do not fall, whose fruits will be given rather than dropped: not shaken off by ripeness, not struck down by outside force, but measured out by the dispensation of a rational office. And what is signified by the leaves is clear from comparison with bodily things. For we see that the nature of leaves is to burst forth around the fruits to guard them, fortifying the tender beginnings of the fruit as with a rampart. The teaching of God's words, then, which clothes the fruits promised us, is signified by the leaves. For by these words our hopes are shaded, and by their protection they are covered amid the storms of this age. These leaves, then, that is, the words of God, will not fall, for the Lord said: "Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will not pass away." For nothing of what has been spoken by God will slip away or fall.
1.17CSEL 22:31–32
Quod autem hsec folia ligni huius non inutilia sint, sed salutaria gentibus, sanctus Iohannes in Apocalypsi testatur dicens: et ostendit mihi flumen aquae uitae, splendidum tamquam crystallum, exiens de throno dei et agni, in medio platese eius et ex utraque parte fluminis arborem uitae, quae facit fructum duodecies, singulis mensibus reddens fructum suum, et folia arboris illius sunt ad sanitatem gentium. caeleste sacramentum ita per corporales species exponitur, ut rationem spiritalem corporalia ipsa quamquam inplere non possint, tamen ad corporum rationem mutila sint. conuenerat enim dixisse. ex utraque parte fluminis demonstrati arbores esse, non arborem. sed quia uitae arbor ubique in sacramento baptismi una est, undique ad se uenientibus apostolicse praedicationis fructus subministrans, ideo ex utraque parte fluminis una uitae arbor adsistit. unus enim agnus est in dei throno uisus, et unum flumen, et uitae arbor una: quse omnia in se conplectuntur mysteria corporationis, baptismi, passionis, cuius folia, id est prsedicationis uerba, salutem gentibus per doctrinam eloquii non decidentis inpertiunt.
That these leaves of this tree are not useless but bring health to the nations, holy John testifies in the Apocalypse, saying: "And he showed me a river of the water of life, bright as crystal, going out from the throne of God and of the Lamb; in the middle of its street, and on either side of the river, the tree of life, which bears fruit twelve times, yielding its fruit each month; and the leaves of that tree are for the healing of the nations." The heavenly mystery is set forth through bodily images in such a way that, although bodily things cannot fulfil the spiritual meaning, they are nevertheless defective by the reasoning of bodies. For it would have been fitting to say that trees, not a tree, were shown on either side of the river. But because the tree of life is everywhere one in the mystery of baptism, supplying the fruits of the apostolic preaching to those who come to it from every side, therefore one tree of life stands on either side of the river. For one Lamb was seen on the throne of God, and one river, and one tree of life: all of which embrace in themselves the mysteries of the taking of a body, of baptism, and of the passion; and its leaves, that is, the words of preaching, impart health to the nations through the teaching of speech that does not fall.
1.18CSEL 22:32
Et omnia, inquit, quaecumque faciet, prosperabuntur. iam non, sicut in Adam, donum eius et statuta perturbabuntur — quia ille constitutae inmortalitatis beatitudinem peccato transgressae legis amisit —, sed per redemptionem ligni uitae, id est dominica passione, cum ipsi ligno uitae similes erimus, iam, quidquid in nobis fiet, aeternum est, aeternum autem cum beatitudinis sensu. prosperabuntur enim omnia illa, quae fient: non demutatione incerta, non in natura infirma, cum incorruptio corruptionem et aeternitas infirmitatem et forma dei formam terrenae carnis absorbuerit. huic igitur plantato ligno, in tempore suo hos fructus suos danti, beatus ille uir erit similis, ipse quoque in paradiso plantatus, ut plantatio dei non eradicanda permaneat; in quo omnia a deo facta prospere dirigentur, nulla deinceps demutatione uel infirmitatis nostrae eradicanda uel temporis.
"And all things whatever he does," it says, "will prosper." No longer, as in Adam, will his gift and appointments be thrown into confusion (for he lost the blessedness of the immortality given him by the sin of transgressing the law); but through the redemption of the tree of life, that is, the Lord's passion, when we shall be like the tree of life itself, whatever is done in us is then eternal, and eternal with the sense of blessedness. For all the things that will be done will prosper, not by uncertain change, not in weak nature, when incorruption has swallowed up corruption, eternity weakness, and the form of God the form of earthly flesh. That blessed man, then, will be like this planted tree, which gives these its fruits in its season, being himself also planted in paradise, so that the planting of God may remain not to be uprooted; in him all things done by God will be directed prosperously, with no further change, either of our weakness or of time, to uproot them.
1.19CSEL 22:32–33
Demonstrata autem perfecta huius uiri beatitudine consequens erat, quae impios poena maneret, ostendere. sequitur namque: non sic impii, non sic, sed tamquam puluis, quem proicit uentus a facie terrse. non est impiis conparatiuae huius beatitudinis spes relicta, sed uagum eos. obtritum, uentilatum, dispersum et inquietum manet, ut ex illa corporalis soliditatis firmitate decussi ludibrio pulueris differantur in p“nam: non in nihilum dissoluti, ut sit in his materies p“nalis, sed in inane ac leue aridumque protriti, ut ludibriosa p“nse mobilitate iactentur. cuius p“nse et loco altero idem prophetameminit, dicens: comminuam eos ut puluerem ante faciem uenti, ut lutum platearum delebo illos. conparatio itaque ut beatitudinis, ita et poenae est constituta. quam enim nullus labor est uento puluerem dissipare et quam lutum in plateis ingredientes se prope calcasse non sentiunt, ita p“nse illi infernae facile est impios delere atque dispergere, quos peccatorum ratio et in lutum soluerit et comminuerit in puluerem, non relicta neque substantia firmitatis, cum puluis et lutum sint et per id quod puluis et lutum sunt, in naturam tantum poenalis substantiae reseruati.
Having shown the perfect blessedness of this man, it followed to show what punishment awaits the ungodly. For there follows: "Not so the ungodly, not so; but like the dust which the wind drives from the face of the earth." No hope of this comparative blessedness is left to the ungodly; instead a wandering state awaits them, crushed, winnowed, scattered, and restless, so that, shaken loose from that firmness of bodily solidity, they are carried off into punishment as the plaything of dust: not dissolved into nothing, so that there may be in them material for punishment, but ground down into what is empty, light, and dry, so that they may be tossed about by the mocking mobility of punishment. The same prophet mentions this punishment in another place too, saying: "I will crush them like dust before the face of the wind; like the mud of the streets I will destroy them." So the comparison is set up for punishment as for blessedness. For as it is no labour for the wind to scatter dust, and as those who walk in the streets hardly feel they have trodden the mud, so it is easy for that infernal punishment to destroy and scatter the ungodly, whom the account of their sins has both dissolved into mud and crushed into dust, yet without leaving them even the substance of firmness, since they are dust and mud and, by being dust and mud, are reserved only in the nature of a substance for punishment.
1.20CSEL 22:33–34
Et quia per hanc demutationem obtritae in puluerem firmitatis non erunt eius boni participes, quod beato uiro ex fructu ligni dabitur in tempore, ideo consequenter adiecit: propterea non resurgunt impii in iudicio. non abolitio his, qui utique puluis erunt, per id quod non resurgent denuntiatur, sed resurrectio his in iudicium denegatur. non enim per id quod non erunt, sensu p“nse carebunt: quia lucri p“nam faciet, quod non subsistet ad p“nam. subsistent autem. quia erunt puluis. puluerem uero effici uel ariditate uel adtritu, non est subsistendi amisisse naturam, sed in naturam alteram substitisse. per id autem, quod in iudicium non resurgent, absolutum est non resurgendi eos caruisse natura, sed resurgendi in iudicium ordinem perdidisse. qui autem resurrectionis et iudicii ordo intellegendus sit, dominus in euangeliis ostendit dicens: qui credit in me, non iudicatur: qui autem non credit, iam iudicatus est. hoc est autem iudicium, quia lux uenit in hunc mundum. et dilexerunt homines magis tenebras quam lumen.
And since through this change of their firmness, ground into dust, they will not share in the good that will be given the blessed man from the fruit of the tree in its season, he therefore added fittingly: "Therefore the ungodly do not rise in the judgment." It is not annihilation that is announced to those who will indeed be dust, by saying they will not rise; rather, resurrection to judgment is denied them. For they will not lack the sense of punishment by not existing, since what does not subsist for punishment would turn punishment into gain. But they will subsist, because they will be dust. To become dust, whether by drying or by grinding, is not to have lost the nature of subsisting, but to have come to subsist in another nature. By saying that they will not rise to judgment, it is made clear that they have not lost the nature of rising, but have lost the order of rising to judgment. What order of resurrection and judgment is to be understood, the Lord shows in the Gospels, saying: "He who believes in me is not judged; but he who does not believe has already been judged. And this is the judgment, that the light has come into this world, and men loved darkness rather than light."
1.21CSEL 22:34
Neglegentem audientium et incuriosam legentium facilitatem dicti dominici sermo perturbat. cum enim dicit: qui credit in me, non iudicabitur, exemit iudicio fideles; et cum subiecit: qui autem non credit, iam iudicatus est, non admisit ad iudicium infideles. ergo si credentes exemit. et reppulit infideles, nec in hos nec in illos iudicii sorte permissa, quomodo conuenire sibi in hoc, quod tertium ait, existimabitur: hoc est autem iudicium, quia lux uenit in hunc mundum, et dilexerunt homines magis tenebras quam lumen? non enim potest locus relictus esse iudicio, cum neque infideles nec fideles sint iudicandi. et haec quidem ita esse auditoribus neglegentibus et lectoribus incuriosis uidebuntur: ceterum in se uirtus ipsa uerborum proprietatem dicti et intellegentiam continet.
The words of the Lord's saying trouble the careless readiness of hearers and the incurious ease of readers. For when he says, "He who believes in me will not be judged," he exempted the faithful from judgment; and when he added, "But he who does not believe has already been judged," he did not admit the unbelievers to judgment. If, then, he exempted believers and rejected unbelievers, allowing the lot of judgment to neither, how will he be thought consistent in what he says third: "And this is the judgment, that the light has come into this world, and men loved darkness rather than light"? For no place can be left for judgment if neither unbelievers nor believers are to be judged. So it will seem to careless hearers and incurious readers; but the very force of the words contains in itself the proper sense and understanding of the saying.
1.22CSEL 22:34–35
Qui credit, inquit. non iudicatur. quid enim necesse est iudicare credentem? iudicium enim ex ambiguis rebus existit. et ambiguitate adempta iudicii non desideratur examen. ex quo ne infideles quidem necesse est iudicari, quia ambiguitas, quin infideles sint, non resedit, sed adempto in credentes non credentesque iudicio causam dominus iudicii et auctores, in quos iudicari necesse esset, adiecit. sunt enim aliqui, inter pios impiosque pui medii sint, ex utroque admixti, neutri tamen proprii, quia in id ipsum constiterint ex utroque: nec fidei admiscendi, quia sit illis aliquid infidelitatis insertum, nec infidelitati deputandi, quia aliquid habeant et fidei. plures namque dei metus in ecclesia continet: sed eosdem tamen ad ssecularia uitia saeculi blandimenta sollicitant. orant, quia timent; peccant, quia uolunt. Christianos se nuncupant, quia bona est spes aeternitatis: gentilia agunt, quia blanda praesentis sunt. impii non manent, quia his dei nomen in honore est: pii non sunt, quia quse? pietatis sunt aliena sectantur. et necesse est ea magis diligant, per quse id quod se nuncupant esse non possunt, secundum nuncupationis uoluntatem operum uoluntate potiore. et idcirco dominus postea quam credentes non iudicandos et non credentes iam iudicatos esse dixerat, addidit: hoc est autem iudicium, quia lux uenit in hunc mundum, et dilexerunt homines magis tenebras quam lumen. in eos ergo iudicium est, quod iam et in incredulos actum est et in credentes non necessarium est: quia magis tenebras quam lumen dilexerint; non quod non dilexerint et lumen, sed quod dilectio illis fuerit magis propensa tenebrarum. prseferri enim solet dilectioni ex comparatione dilectio: et hinc iudicium est, quia, cum dilexerint Christum. magis tamen tenebras dilexerunt. hi ergo iudicabuntur, qui neque ut pii non iudicabuntur. neque iam fuerint ut impii iudicati, in quos ex praelata potius dilectione iudicium est.
"He who believes," he says, "is not judged." For what need is there to judge a believer? Judgment arises from doubtful matters, and when doubt is removed, examination by judgment is not required. For this reason not even unbelievers need to be judged, because no doubt remains that they are unbelievers. But having removed judgment from believers and unbelievers, the Lord added the cause of judgment and the persons on whom judgment must be passed. For there are some between the godly and the ungodly who are in the middle, mixed from both, yet belonging properly to neither, because they consist of both: not to be mixed with faith, since some unbelief is woven into them, nor to be counted with unbelief, since they have something of faith. For the fear of God holds many in the church, yet the allurements of the world entice the same people to worldly vices. They pray because they fear; they sin because they will. They call themselves Christians, because the hope of eternity is good; they act as pagans, because present things are pleasant. They do not remain ungodly, because God's name is in honour with them; they are not godly, because they follow things foreign to godliness. And they must love more the things through which they cannot be what they call themselves, the will of their works being stronger than the will expressed in their name. And so the Lord, after saying that believers are not to be judged and unbelievers have already been judged, added: "And this is the judgment, that the light has come into this world, and men loved darkness rather than light." The judgment, then, is upon those, a judgment that has already been carried out on the unbelieving and is not necessary for believers, because they loved darkness more than light; not that they did not also love the light, but that their love inclined more to darkness. For one love is commonly preferred to another by comparison; and hence comes judgment, because, though they loved Christ, they loved darkness more. These, then, will be judged: those who neither will escape judgment like the godly nor have already been judged like the ungodly, on whom judgment falls because of the love they preferred.
1.23CSEL 22:35–36
Huius quidem euangelicae dispositionis tenuit et propheta rationem, dicens: propterea non resurgunt impii in iudicio, neque peccatores in consilio iustorum. impiis iudicium, quia iam iudicati sunt, non relinquit; peccatoribus autem, quos superiore sermone discerni ab impiis docuimus, consilium iustorum, quia iudicandi sint, denegauit. illos enim pneiudicatos impietas facit, bos uero peccatum detinet iudicandos. itaque neque impietas, quae iam iudicata est, peccatorum est permissa iudicio, neque peccatores, qui iudicandi sunt, iustorum, qui non iudicabuntur, meriti sunt digni esse consilio.
The prophet too held the reasoning of this gospel arrangement, saying: "Therefore the ungodly do not rise in the judgment, nor sinners in the counsel of the righteous." To the ungodly he leaves no judgment, because they have already been judged; but to sinners, whom we showed above to be distinguished from the ungodly, he denied the counsel of the righteous, because they are to be judged. For ungodliness makes the former judged beforehand, while sin holds the latter for judgment. So neither is ungodliness, which has already been judged, allowed the judgment of sinners, nor have sinners, who are to be judged, deserved to be in the counsel of the righteous, who will not be judged.
1.24CSEL 22:36–37
Et huius differentiae hinc ordo proficiscitur: quia cognoscit, inquit, dominus uiam iustorum, et uia impiorum peribit. consilium iustorum peccatores idcirco non adeunt, quia uiam iustorum dominus cognoscit. cognoscit autem non ignorationis scientia, sed dignatione noscendi. neque enim hsec in deo passionum humanarum demutatio est, ut aliquid aut cognoscat, aut nesciat. beatus apostolus Paulus, qua ratione a deo cognosceremur exposuit, dicens: si quis est in uobis propheta aut spiritalis, cognoscat quae scribo uobis, quia domini sunt: si quis autem non cognoscit, non cognoscitur. eos ergo cognosci a deo ostendit, qui, quae dei sunt, cognouerint: tum cognoscendi, cum cognouerint, dignationem scilicet cognitionis per meritum religionis cognitae consequentes, ut quod cognoscitur, non ignorantis profectus intellegatur esse, sed cogniti. absolute autem dominus ostendit in Adam atque Abraham peccatores se ignorare, cognoscere autem fideles. namque Adae post peccatum dictum est: ubi es, Adam? non quod deus, quem adhuc in paradiso habebat, in paradiso esse nesciret; sed quod, dum ubi sit interrogatur, indignus cognitione dei per id, quod peccauit, ostenditur. Abraham autem diu ignoratus, scilicet ad quem septuagenarium iam dei fuit sermo, cum se per oblationem Isaac fidelem domino probasset, tali in diuinam familiaritatem dignatione suscipitur: nunc cognoui, quia times dominum deum tuum et non pepercisti filio tuo dilecto propter me. non ignorabat utique Abrahse fidem, quam ei de generando Isaac credenti et ad iustitiam deputauerat: sed quia magnum timoris sui dederat filium offerendo docimentum, nunc cognoscitur, nunc probatur, nunc dignus est. qui non ignoretur. sic itaque deus et agnoscit et nescit, cum Adam peccator nescitur et Abraham fidelis agnoscitur, dignus scilicet, qui a deo nihil utique ignorante noscatur. cognita ergo est deo iustorum non iudicandorum uia: et idcirco peccatores, qui iudicandi sunt. eorum consilio submouentur. impii autem in iudicium non resurgent, quia deperdita eorum uia iam fuerint iudicati per eum, qui ait: pater non iudicat quemquam, sed omne iudicium dedit filio, domino nostro Iesu Christo, qui est benedictus in saecula sseculorum. amen.
And the order of this difference comes from this: "For the Lord knows," it says, "the way of the righteous, and the way of the ungodly will perish." Sinners do not come into the counsel of the righteous because the Lord knows the way of the righteous. He knows, not with a knowledge that removes ignorance, but by the favour of acknowledging. For there is no such change of human passions in God that he either knows something or does not know it. The blessed apostle Paul explained in what sense we are known by God, saying: "If anyone among you is a prophet or spiritual, let him know that what I write to you is from the Lord; but if anyone does not know, he is not known." He shows, then, that those are known by God who have known the things of God; to be known when they have known, that is, attaining the favour of acknowledgment through the merit of the religion they have known, so that being known is understood as the advance not of one ignorant but of one known. The Lord showed clearly in Adam and Abraham that he does not know sinners but knows the faithful. For to Adam after his sin it was said: "Where are you, Adam?", not because God did not know that one whom he still had in paradise was in paradise, but because, by being asked where he is, he is shown to be unworthy of God's knowledge through having sinned. Abraham, however, long unknown (for the word of God came to him when he was already seventy), when he had proved himself faithful to the Lord by offering Isaac, is received into divine familiarity with this favour: "Now I know that you fear the Lord your God, and you have not spared your beloved son for my sake." He was certainly not ignorant of Abraham's faith, which he had reckoned to him as righteousness when he believed about the begetting of Isaac; but because he had given a great proof of his fear by offering his son, now he is known, now he is approved, now he is worthy not to be unknown. So God both acknowledges and does not know: Adam the sinner is not known, and Abraham the faithful is acknowledged, worthy to be known by God, who is ignorant of nothing. The way of the righteous, who are not to be judged, is therefore known to God, and for this reason sinners, who are to be judged, are removed from their counsel. But the ungodly will not rise to judgment, because, their way having perished, they have already been judged by him who said: "The Father judges no one, but has given all judgment to the Son," our Lord Jesus Christ, who is blessed for ever and ever. Amen.
Tractates 2
2.1CSEL 22:37–38
Plures nostrum ambiguos facit apostolica auctoritas, utrum psalmum hunc cohaerentem primo et ueluti primi extimum putent esse, an uero subiacentem et secundum potius connumerent. namque in Actibus apostolorum primum hunc haberi atque esse, sub oratione beati Pauli ita docemur: nosque uobis euangelizamus eam, quse ad patres facta est promissio: hanc deus expleuit filiis nostris. suscitans dominum nostrum Iesum, sicut et in psalmo scriptum est primo: filius meus es tu, ego hodie genui te; cum suscitauit eum a mortuis amplius non regressurum in interitum. ob hanc ergo apostolicam auctoritatem errore scribentium fieri creditur, ut in ordine secundus psalmus iste numeretur, cum primus esse ipso doctore gentium testante noscatur. cognoscenda itaque ea ratio est, cur et a nobis secundus esse intellegendus sit, et ab apostolo esse primus ostensus sit.
Apostolic authority makes many of us uncertain whether to think this psalm joined to the first, as its conclusion so to speak, or rather to count it as following and second. For in the Acts of the Apostles we are taught, in a speech of blessed Paul, that this one is held to be, and is, the first: "And we bring you the good news of the promise made to the fathers, that God has fulfilled it for our children by raising up our Lord Jesus, as it is written in the first psalm: You are my Son, today I have begotten you; when he raised him from the dead, never again to return to corruption." On account of this apostolic authority, then, it is believed to be through the error of copyists that this psalm is numbered second in order, since it is known to be the first on the testimony of the teacher of the Gentiles himself. So we must learn the reason why it is to be understood by us as second and was shown by the apostle to be first.
2.2CSEL 22:38–39
Mediis namque legis temporibus, priusquam unigenitus dei filius, ante saecula manens deus uerbum, homo nascitur. poscente rege Ptolomaeo) septuaginta seniores libros Veteris Testamenti ex hebra'is litteris in graecas transtulerunt. erat autem iam a Moyse antea institutum, in synagoga omni septuaginta esse doctores. nam idem Moyses, quamuis uerba Testamenti in litteras condidisset, tamen separatim quaedam ex occultis legis secretiora mysteria septuaginta senioribus, qui doctores deinceps manerent, intimauerat. cuius doctrinae etiam dominus in euangeliis meminit, dicens: super cathedram Moysi, inquit, sederunt. scribae et pharissei: omnia ergo, quaecumque dixerint uobis, facite et seruate: secundum uero facta eorum nolite facere. doctrina ergo horum mansit in posterum, quse. ab ipso scriptore legis accepta in hoc seniorum et numero et officio conseruata est. hi itaque seniores libros hos transferentes et spiritalem secundum Moysi traditionem occultarum cognitionum scientiam adepti ambigua linguae hebraicae dicta et uaria quaedam ex se nuntiantia secundum uirtutes rerum certis et propriis uerborum significationibus transtulerunt, doctrinae scientia multimodam illam sermonum intellegentiam temperantes. et ex eo fit, ut, qui postea transtulerunt, diuersis modis interpretantes magnum gentibus adtulerint errorem, dum occultse) illius et a Moyse profectae traditionis ignari ea, quae ambigue lingua hebraicae commemorata sunt, incerti suis ipsis iudiciis ediderunt. ambiguitatis autem linguae hebraicae unum adferemus exemplum, ei quo cetera istius modi esse atque ita, ut sunt, intellegantur. Bresith uerbum hebraicum est. id tres significantias in se habet, id est, et in principio. et incapite, et in filio. sed translatores septuaginta in principio ediderunt ceteris diuerse transferentibus: et secundum hanc ambiguitatem haec ab illis in omni translatione est facta confusio.
In the middle of the times of the law, before the only-begotten Son of God, God the Word abiding before the ages, was born as man, the seventy elders, at the request of King Ptolemy, translated the books of the Old Testament from Hebrew into Greek letters. It had already been established by Moses that there should be seventy teachers in every synagogue. For Moses, although he had set down the words of the Testament in writing, had also separately made known certain more secret mysteries from the hidden things of the law to seventy elders, who were to remain teachers thereafter. The Lord too mentions this teaching in the Gospels, saying: "The scribes and Pharisees have sat on the chair of Moses; therefore do and keep whatever they tell you, but do not do according to their deeds." Their teaching, then, remained for later times, received from the writer of the law himself and preserved in this number and office of elders. So these elders, translating these books and having acquired, according to the tradition of Moses, the spiritual knowledge of hidden understandings, translated the ambiguous sayings of the Hebrew language, and certain words that declare various things of themselves, with definite and proper meanings of words according to the powers of the things, governing that manifold understanding of the language by the knowledge of the teaching. From this it comes about that those who translated afterwards, interpreting in different ways, brought great error to the nations, since, ignorant of that hidden tradition which came from Moses, they issued by their own uncertain judgments what had been said ambiguously in the Hebrew language. We shall give one example of the ambiguity of the Hebrew language, from which the rest of this kind may be understood to be, and understood as they are. Bresith is a Hebrew word. It has three meanings in it: "in the beginning," "in the head," and "in the Son." But the seventy translators rendered it "in the beginning," while the others translated differently; and according to this ambiguity this confusion has been made by them in every translation.
2.3CSEL 22:39–40
Sed perfecta horum septuaginta interpretum auctoritas manet. primum, quod ante aduentum corporalem domini transtulerunt, nec adulatio interpretandi adhibita tempori arguetur, tanto anteriore interpretationis aetate: dehinc, quod ipsi illi principes doctoresque synagogae et praeter scientiam legis per Moysen quoque doctrina secretiore perfecti non potuerunt inprobabiles esse arbitri interpretandi, qui certissimi et grauissimi erant auctores docendi. hi ergo psalmos inter ceteros libros transferentes et in numerum redegerunt et in ordinem conlocauerunt et diapsalmis distinxerunt, qui omnes secundum Hebraeos confusi et habebantur et habentur. horum igitur translationes habentur tum lingua tantum sua utentibus non erant necessariae. ipsis tamen, omnibus diligenti et religiosa custodia obseruatis. quibus postea dominus legem omnem sacramento et corporationis suae et passionis et resurrectionis inpleuerat, cumque his libris, quos regi idem translatores ediderant, conlatis et fideliter consonantibus repertis, indissolubilis constituta est priuilegio doctrina; et setatis auctoritas.
But the authority of these seventy interpreters remains complete. First, because they translated before the Lord's bodily coming, and no flattery of the times can be charged against their interpretation, since it is so much older. Then, because these very leaders and teachers of the synagogue, perfected besides in the knowledge of the law by the more secret teaching through Moses, could not be unworthy judges of interpretation, being the most certain and weighty authorities for teaching. They, then, translating the psalms among the other books, brought them into number, placed them in order, and divided them with diapsalmata, all of which among the Hebrews both were and are kept in confusion. Their translations were then not necessary for those who used only their own language. Yet they were kept by them with careful and devout guarding; and when the Lord afterwards had fulfilled the whole law with the mystery of his taking a body, his passion, and his resurrection, and these books, which the same translators had issued for the king, were compared and found faithfully in agreement, the teaching was established as indissoluble by privilege, and so was the authority of its antiquity.
2.4CSEL 22:40
Beatus ergo apostolus Paulus, secundum professionem suam Hebrseus ex Hebraeis, etiam secundum hebraicam cognitionem et fidem psalmum hunc primum esse dixit, translatorum distinctione non usus: cui maximum hoc prsedicandi ad synagogse principes studium erat, ut dominum nostrum Iesum Christum dei filium, natum, passum, resurgentem regnare in aeternum ex doctrina legis ostenderet. tenuit itaque hunc modum, ut Hebrseis praedicans Hebrseorum consuetudine uteretur. sed nobis translatorum utendum auctoritate est, legem non ambiguitate litterae, sed doctrinae scientia transferentum.
The blessed apostle Paul, then, a Hebrew of Hebrews by his own profession, called this psalm the first also according to Hebrew knowledge and belief, not using the translators' division. His greatest concern in preaching to the leaders of the synagogue was to show from the teaching of the law that our Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God, was born, suffered, rose again, and reigns for ever. So he kept this method, that in preaching to Hebrews he used the custom of the Hebrews. But we must use the authority of the translators, who translated the law not by the ambiguity of the letter but by the knowledge of the teaching.
2.5CSEL 22:40–41
Praestat autem nunc absolutissimam intellegentiam personae, temporis, causae apostolica auctoritas. nam quid in libro Actorum suorum de hoc eodem psalmo idem apostoli senserint, uerbis ipsorum loquemur. scriptum namque est: ipsis dicentibus: domine, tu es, qui fecisti cselum et terram et mare et omnia, quae in illis sunt, qui partris nostri Dauid, sancti pueri tui, dixisti: quare fremuerunt gentes, et populi meditati sunt inania? adstiterunt reges terrse', et principes conuenerunt in unum id ipsum aduersus dominum et aduersus Christum eius. conuenerunt enim in ueritate in ciuitate ista aduersus sanctum tuum filium Iesum. quem unxisti, Herodes et Pontius Pilatus et populus Israhel facere, quanta manus tua et consilium praescripsit fieri. et nunc, domine, respice in minas eorum, et da seruis tuis cum omni fiducia loqui uerbum tuum. non ergo ambiguum est, quid tanto anteriore tempore prophetise psalmus ostenderit. nam permixti tum sibi in Herode atque Pilato gentes frementes et populi uana meditantes in unum cum ipsis suis regibus et principibus adstiterunt. communi enim et praetoris et tetrarchse iudicio in dominum confirmata damnationis est passio.
Apostolic authority now gives a most complete understanding of the person, the time, and the cause. For what the apostles thought of this same psalm in the book of their Acts we shall say in their own words. For it is written, they themselves saying: "Lord, you are he who made heaven and earth and the sea and all things that are in them, who by the mouth of our father David, your holy servant, said: Why did the nations rage, and the peoples meditate vain things? The kings of the earth stood by, and the rulers gathered together against the Lord and against his Christ. For truly in this city there gathered together against your holy Son Jesus, whom you anointed, Herod and Pontius Pilate and the people of Israel, to do whatever your hand and counsel had predetermined to take place. And now, Lord, look upon their threats, and grant to your servants to speak your word with all boldness." There is no doubt, then, what the psalm showed by prophecy so long before. For the raging nations and the peoples meditating vain things, mingled together at that time in Herod and Pilate, stood together with their own kings and rulers. For by the joint judgment of the governor and the tetrarch the passion of condemnation was confirmed against the Lord.
2.6CSEL 22:41
Et quidem diligenter secundum propheticam scientiam unicuique generi et nomini singulorum quorumque uerborum est proprietas coaptata: ut gentes fremuerint, inperito scilicet motu inconditoque commotae, dei filium in corpore cernentes et audientes. quae usque adeo fremuerunt, ut corona spinea conpunxerint, ueste regia indutum salutatione atque honore regis inluserint, harundine caput contuderint, aceto ac felle potauerint, lancea latus foderint. cohors enim militum Pilato subditorum ex fremitu irse intemperantis haec gessit.
And indeed, according to prophetic knowledge, the propriety of each word has been carefully fitted to each kind and name: so that the nations "raged," moved with an ignorant and disordered motion, as they saw and heard the Son of God in the body. They raged so far that they pierced him with a crown of thorns, clothed him in a royal robe and mocked him with the greeting and honour of a king, beat his head with a reed, gave him vinegar and gall to drink, and pierced his side with a spear. For the cohort of soldiers under Pilate did these things from the rage of unrestrained anger.
2.7CSEL 22:41–42
Populi autem inania meditati sunt id est inani in doctrinis dei meditatione uersati, cum per meditationem legis non intellexerint, qui prsedicabatur in lege. iam enim tum non tantum ex illa secundum carnem Abrahae generatione synagogse populus abundabat, sed ex multis populis; in uno Israhel populi nomine multorum populorum diuersitas continebatur. et hoc in Actorum libro ita scribitur: erant autem in Hierusalem habitantes Iudsei, uiri timentes deum, ab omni gente, quae sub caelo est. populi itaque isti meditati inania sunt ex multis populis in unum populum congregati.
The peoples "meditated vain things," that is, they were occupied in vain meditation on the teachings of God, since by meditating on the law they did not understand him who was proclaimed in the law. For already at that time the people of the synagogue abounded not only from Abraham's generation according to the flesh but from many peoples; under the one name of the people of Israel the diversity of many peoples was contained. This is written thus in the book of Acts: "There were dwelling in Jerusalem Jews, devout men, from every nation under heaven." So these peoples, gathered from many peoples into one people, meditated vain things.
2.8CSEL 22:42
Reges quoque adstiterunt, Pilatus scilicet et Herodes, in quibus reges terrae intelleguntur: et uterque pro legum, quibus prseerant, necessitate praesentiae suse adhibuit officium. qui. autem impio inreligiosoque consilio multis conuentibus aduersus dominum tractabant, hi principes conueniunt in unum: frequenter scilicet in domum Caiphse omnibus sacerdotum principibus congregatis. denique reges terrae cognominati sunt Herodes tetrarcha et Pilatus pra-tor. quia iure terreni imperii adstiterunt. ceteri autem, qui in unum conuenerunt, neque principes terrae sunt. neque principes sacerdotum, quia nec ius regni sui prsetori Romano et tetrarchae subditi obtinebant, neque ultra iam principes sacerdotum cognominari merebantur, quia impii in deum ac dominum ipsius sacerdotii extitissent.
The kings also stood by, namely Pilate and Herod, in whom the kings of the earth are understood; and each of them, as the laws over which they presided required, gave the service of his presence. But those who in ungodly and irreligious counsel plotted against the Lord in many meetings, these rulers "gathered together," that is, all the chief priests frequently assembled in the house of Caiaphas. So Herod the tetrarch and Pilate the governor were called kings of the earth, because they stood by in right of earthly rule. But the others, who gathered together, are neither rulers of the earth nor chief priests, since, being subject to the Roman governor and the tetrarch, they did not hold the right of their own kingdom, nor did they any longer deserve to be called chief priests, because they had shown themselves ungodly toward God, the Lord of that very priesthood.
2.9CSEL 22:42–43
Et quia non ambiguum est, ex persona dei Patris secundum apostolicam auctoritatem psalmum c“ptum esse, quippe cum dixerint: qui per os patris nostri Dauid. sancti pueri tui, dixisti, idcirco enim ad intellegendam personse demutationem ab interpretantibus interiectum diapsalma est, licet in libris Hebraorum non contineretur. persona ergo, quse? demutatur, apostolorum esse intellegenda est, dicentium: dis rumpamus uincula eorum et proiciamus a nobis iugum ipsorum. detestari eos necesse est quod arguunt. horum ergo, qui et fremuerunt et inania meditati sunt, uincula disrumpunt et iugum abiciunt. et non ambiguum est, quin. differat iugum abicere et uincula rumpere: quod utrumque utrique superius memorato et generi et nomini conuenit. ut uirorum gentium rumpant, iugum autem populorum abiciant. quia gentes peccatorum suorum uinculis conligentur, a quibus absoluere se per infidelitatem non possunt, secundum id quod dictum est: fasciis peccatorum suorum constrictus est peccator, Judsei uero iugo legis onerentur, quod a se apostoli abiciunt, beato Petro dicente: nunc uero quid temptatis dominum. ponere supra collum discipulorum iugum, quod neque patres nostri, neque nos potuimus portare? hoc ergo populorum iugum a se abiciunt, quia subditi eo fuerunt: uincula autem non sibi, sed gentibus disrumpunt. et ita utriusque sermonis ratio seruata est, ut., ubi uincula disrumpuntur. nullam personse sua* significantiam addant, ubi uero abiciunt iugum, illic dicendo: abiciamus a no b is, non de aliis quam de se ipsis locuti intellegantur: ut graui isto et intolerabili abiecto suaui illo ac leui, ad quod inuitati sunt, euangelica? sanctificationis se iugo subderent, gentium autem uincula per libertatem prsedicationis abrumperent, secundum illud, quod in eiusdem psalmi commemoratione dixerunt: et nunc, domine, respice in minas illorum et da seruis tuis cum omni fiducia loqui uerbum tuum. hae enim apostolicse doctrinae omnium infidelitatum et peccaminum laqueos abrumpunt.
And since there is no doubt, according to apostolic authority, that the psalm began in the person of God the Father (for they said, "who by the mouth of our father David, your holy servant, said"), therefore the translators inserted a diapsalma to show the change of person, although it was not contained in the Hebrew books. The person that now changes is to be understood as that of the apostles, saying: "Let us break their bonds and cast away their yoke from us." They must detest what they rebuke. So they break the bonds and throw off the yoke of those who both raged and meditated vain things. And there is no doubt that throwing off a yoke differs from breaking bonds; and each suits one of the two kinds and names mentioned above: they break the bonds of the nations and throw off the yoke of the peoples. For the nations are bound by the bonds of their sins, from which they cannot free themselves through unbelief, according to the saying, "The sinner is bound fast by the cords of his sins"; but the Jews are burdened with the yoke of the law, which the apostles throw off from themselves, as blessed Peter says: "Now therefore why do you tempt the Lord by putting on the neck of the disciples a yoke which neither our fathers nor we have been able to bear?" They throw off this yoke of the peoples from themselves, then, because they were subject to it; but the bonds they break not for themselves but for the nations. And so the reasoning of both expressions is preserved: where bonds are broken they add no sign of their own person, but where they throw off the yoke, by saying "let us cast away from us," they are understood to speak of none but themselves; so that, having thrown off that heavy and intolerable yoke, they might subject themselves to the sweet and light yoke of gospel sanctification to which they were invited, and might break the bonds of the nations through the freedom of preaching, according to what they said in their recollection of this same psalm: "And now, Lord, look upon their threats, and grant to your servants to speak your word with all boldness." For these apostolic teachings break the snares of all unbelief and sins.
2.10CSEL 22:43–44
Et quia superius duplex persona seruata est, cum ait: aduersus dominum et aduersus Christum eius gemina quoque nunc ridentis et subsannantis significatio consecuta est. non enim discernitur contumelia alterius ab altero. neque discretus est honor religionis ad utrumque. qui enim per genuinam patris et filii secundum se legitimamque naturam in gloria diuinitatis unum sunt, unum etiam sunt uel in eontemptus iniuria, uel in honore reuerentiae, et alter in altero ant honorificatur aut spernitur. atque id ipsum dominus testatus est dicens: sicut pater suscitat mortuos et uiuificat, sic et filius, quos uult, uiuificat. nec enim pater iudicat quemquam, sed omne iudicium dedit filio, ut omnes honorificent filium, sicut honorificant patrem. qui non honorificat filium, non honorificat patrem, qui misit illum. non distinguitur honor. non discernitur contumelia: aequa in utrumque religio expectatur, et iniuria unius contemptus utriusque est. ita cum in uno uterque spernatur, qui unum sunt in diuinitate ambo per gloriam, unum quoque sunt in religione ambo per honorem. ut nunc' qui aduersum dominum conuenerunt, conuenerunt quoque aduersum Christum eius: et quos in caelo habitans inridet, hos et dominus subsannat.
And since a double person was kept above when it said, "against the Lord and against his Christ," there follows now also a twofold expression of one who laughs and one who mocks. For insult to the one is not distinguished from insult to the other, nor is the honour of worship divided between them. For those who are one in the glory of divinity through the genuine and lawful nature of Father and Son as they are in themselves are one also in the injury of contempt and in the honour of reverence, and each is honoured or scorned in the other. The Lord himself testified to this, saying: "As the Father raises the dead and gives them life, so also the Son gives life to whom he will. For the Father judges no one, but has given all judgment to the Son, that all may honour the Son as they honour the Father. He who does not honour the Son does not honour the Father who sent him." Honour is not divided, insult is not distinguished; equal worship is expected toward both, and injury to one is contempt of both. So, since both are scorned in one, those who are both one in divinity through glory are also both one in worship through honour; so that those who gathered against the Lord gathered also against his Christ, and those whom he who dwells in heaven laughs at, the Lord also mocks.
2.11CSEL 22:44–45
Non quod non et dominus esset semper in caelo, quippe qui de se ipse testatus sit: nemo ascendit in cselum, nisi qui descendit de caelo, filius hominis. qui est in caelo. non abest ergo a caelo, quia, cum de caelo descenderit, filius hominis manens atque loquens, esset tamen, cum hsec loqueretur, in cselo. descenderat quidem filius hominis. sed per naturae uirtutem non aberat filius dei, unde descenderat, neque se ex eo, quod antea erat, tum. cum homo est natus. absumpserat; neque factus filius hominis, filius dei esse defecerat. sed adeo filius hominis filius dei est, ut descendens de cselo filius dei per uirtutis suae substantiam idem filius hominis esset in caelo.
Not that the Lord too was not always in heaven, since he testified of himself: "No one has ascended into heaven except he who descended from heaven, the Son of Man, who is in heaven." He is not absent from heaven, then, because, though he had descended from heaven and was remaining and speaking as the Son of Man, yet while he was saying these things he was in heaven. The Son of Man had indeed descended, but by the power of his nature the Son of God was not absent from where he had descended; nor, when he was born as man, had he lost what he was before; nor, having become Son of Man, had he ceased to be Son of God. Rather, the Son of Man is so truly Son of God that the Son of God, descending from heaven, was through the substance of his power the same Son of Man in heaven.
2.12CSEL 22:45–46
Sed uolens propheta sub persona? distinctione significare patrem, qui, filio suo etiam in filio hominis consistente in terris, in illa aeterna sua sede ac beata maneret et sine descensionis alicuius dispensatione requiesceret, ait: qui habitat in caelis, inridebit eos, et dominus subsannabit eos: ut per eum, qui inrideret habitans in caelo, intellegeretur et dominus. qui subsannaret e ea'lo. non differt autem subsannare et inridere; utrumque enim secundum uoluntat.is adfectum officio oris efficitur. namque secundum intellegentiam nostram per corporales species diuinarum rerum sensus exponitur, ut subsannatio et risus in eludendis his, qui aduersus dominum et aduersus Christum eius conuenerant, nominaretur, non quod in incorporalem deum aut resolutio aut obductio oris incideret, sed ut ex naturae nostrse consuetudine nosceremus, quali in impios esset iudicio diuinae uoluntatis inlusum. subsannati igitur et inrisi sunt. nam qui testes falsos concinnauerant., qui proditionem mercati erant, qui super se ac filios suos sanguinem eius receperant, qui: crucifige clamauerant, qui: descende de cruce, si filius dei es dixerant, qui sepulchrum obsignauerant, qui resurrectionis silentium a militibus et famam furati corporis emerant, perdiderunt tantum impietatis suae laborem. deus est, quem cruci adfixerant: aeternus est, cuius sepulchrum obsignauerant. inridetur impietas, dum ad inlicita nititur. dum inconcessa expetit, dum quod obtinuisse se sperat amittit, dum deum esse, quem tamquam hominem condemnat, agnoscit.
But the prophet, wishing to signify by a distinction of person the Father, who, while his Son was on earth even as Son of Man, remained in that eternal and blessed seat of his and rested without any dispensation of descending, says: "He who dwells in the heavens will laugh at them, and the Lord will mock them"; so that by him who laughed, dwelling in heaven, the Lord also might be understood, who mocked from heaven. There is no difference between mocking and laughing at, for both are done by the service of the mouth according to the disposition of the will. For divine matters are set forth to our understanding through bodily images, so that mocking and laughter are named in the derision of those who had gathered against the Lord and against his Christ; not that either the opening or the drawing of a mouth happens to the bodiless God, but that from the custom of our nature we might know with what judgment of the divine will the ungodly were derided. They were mocked, then, and laughed at. For those who had put together false witnesses, who had bought the betrayal, who had taken his blood upon themselves and their children, who had cried "Crucify," who had said "Come down from the cross, if you are the Son of God," who had sealed the tomb, who had bought from the soldiers silence about the resurrection and the rumour of the stolen body, lost all the labour of their ungodliness. He whom they had fastened to the cross is God; he whose tomb they had sealed is eternal. Ungodliness is laughed at when it strives after what is unlawful, when it seeks what is not granted, when it loses what it hopes to have obtained, when it recognizes as God the one it condemns as a man.
2.13CSEL 22:46–47
Ob quod conpetenter hoc sequitur: tum loquetur ad eos in ira sua et in indignatione sua conturbabit eos. postea enim quam resurgente a mortuis deo, in quem mors per speciem corporis, quod adsumpsit, inciderat, temeritas infructuosse impietatis inrisa est, deus ad eos, quos subsannauerat, loquitur eosque in indignatione conturbat. ac priusquam, qui iste me sermo et quse haec indignationis perturbatio sit, ostendimus, admoneri legentes atque audientes oportet, ne aliquas demutationes passionum perturbationesque motuum cadere in deum credant. nihil enim in aeternam illam et perfectam naturam nouum incidit: neque qui ita est, ut qualis, est, talis et semper sit, ne aliquando non idem sit, potest effici aliquid aliud esse, quam semper est. terrenae istud imperfectaeque causse habent generis, ut demutabiles fiant conuersione naturae, cum laetitiam maeror, placabilitatem ira. beniuolentiam offensa, aequanimitatem inuidia, securitatem sollicitudo perturbat: sumusque per haec aliud aliquando, quam fuimus, cum eam, quae praesens sit, mentis adfectionem subrepens per inconstantiam infirmitatemque nostram motus adpetitionis alterius inquietet et ex eo, quod fuimus, in id, quod sumus, conuersio nos repentina demutet. deus autem beatus atque perfectus profectu non eget, cui nihil deest: demutatione non nouus est, qui origine caret. IPSE EST, qui, quod est, non aliunde est: in sese est, secum est, a se est, suus sibi est et ipse sibi omnia est, carens omni demutatione nouitatis, qui nihil aliud, quod in se posset incidere, per id, quod ipse sibi totum totus est, reliquit.
Therefore this follows fittingly: "Then he will speak to them in his anger, and in his indignation he will trouble them." For after the rashness of fruitless ungodliness was laughed at, when God rose from the dead, God on whom death had fallen through the form of the body he assumed, God speaks to those whom he had mocked and troubles them in indignation. But before we show what this speech is and what this disturbance of indignation is, readers and hearers must be warned not to believe that any changes of passions or disturbances of emotions fall upon God. For nothing new befalls that eternal and perfect nature; nor can he who is such that he is always what he is, lest he ever not be the same, be made anything other than he always is. It belongs to earthly and imperfect kinds of things to become changeable by a conversion of nature, when grief disturbs joy, anger gentleness, offence goodwill, envy calmness, anxiety security; and through these we are at times something other than we were, when, creeping in through our inconstancy and weakness, the movement of another desire disquiets the present disposition of the mind, and a sudden conversion changes us from what we were into what we are. But God, blessed and perfect, needs no advance, since he lacks nothing; he is not made new by change, since he has no origin. He is the one who is not from elsewhere what he is: he is in himself, with himself, from himself, his own to himself, and himself all things to himself, without any change of novelty, since, being whole and entire to himself, he has left nothing else that could befall him.
2.14CSEL 22:47
Ex huius igitur optima ac beniuola beatitudine per dominum nostrum Iesum Christum profectse omnes sunt caelestium et inuisibilium creationes. spiritalium et corporalium constitutiones, non ut profectum sibi aliquem ex his, quibus originem inpertiebat, adquireret. neque enim quisquam eo indiget, quod ex se tribuit, aut per id proficit, cui ad id, quod est, auctor est. exteriora autem sunt, quae adferunt profectum; quia ea, quae inopise? medentur, aliena sunt. deus igitur, ex quo omnia sunt, nullo eorum indiget, quibus id quod sunt esse largitus est: omnia uero ad profectum eorum, quae gignerentur, creauit. et quia longus erit sermo, si etiam de caelestibus et inuisibilibus inchoetur, ex nobis ipsis, ad quos prophetiae psalmus est, tractemus.
From his excellent and kindly blessedness, then, all the creations of heavenly and invisible things and the formations of spiritual and bodily things proceeded through our Lord Jesus Christ, not so that he might gain some advance for himself from those to whom he gave their origin. For no one needs what he gives from himself, or advances by what he is the author of being what it is. Things that bring advance are external, since what remedies want is foreign. God, then, from whom all things are, needs none of those to which he has granted to be what they are; but he created all things for the advance of the things that were to be brought forth. And since the discourse will be long if we begin with heavenly and invisible things, let us treat of ourselves, to whom the prophecy of the psalm is addressed.
2.15CSEL 22:47–48
Hominem, non quod officio eius in aliquo eguerit, instituit, sed, quia bonus est, participem beatitudinis suse condidit et rationale animal in usum largiendae seternitatis suae uita sensuque perfecit; et hoc ex ipsius dictis absolute intellegitur ait enim: sed nunc Israhel, quid dominus deus tuus poscit a te, nisi ut timeas dominum deum tuum et ambules in omnibus uiis eius et diligas eum et seruias domino deo tuo ex toto corde tuo et ex tota anima tua et custodias praecepta domini dei tui et iustificationes eius, quae ego praecipio tibi, ut bene sit tibi? nullum a nobis, nisi innocentiae et religionis et fidei obsequium deus postulat. amari se a nobis exigit, non utique amoris in se nostri fructum aliquem sui causa ipse percipiens, sed amore ipso nobis potius, qui eum amabimus, profuturo. nam amari se, sibique nos obsequi idcirco ut nobis bene sit, expectat, ut digni beatitudinis ac bonitatis suse munere per meritum amoris sui et obsequii iudicemur. bonitatis autem usus, ut splendor solis, ut lumen ignis, ut odor suci, non praebenti proficit, sed utenti. quod ergo sumus, profectus noster est potius, quam eius, qui nos in id, quod sumus, instituit; quia deus bonorum eorum, quse in se sunt seterna, non inuidens in sensum nos atque usum beatae suae bonitatis adsumit.
He established man not because he needed his service in anything, but because he is good he made him a sharer in his blessedness, and he perfected a rational living being with life and sense for the enjoyment of his eternity, which he would bestow. This is plainly understood from his own words, for he says: "And now, Israel, what does the Lord your God ask of you, but to fear the Lord your God, and to walk in all his ways, and to love him, and to serve the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul, and to keep the commandments of the Lord your God and his ordinances, which I command you, that it may be well with you?" God asks of us no service except that of innocence, religion, and faith. He requires to be loved by us, certainly not receiving any fruit for his own sake from our love for him, but the love itself benefiting rather us who shall love him. For he expects to be loved and obeyed, that it may be well with us, so that we may be judged worthy of the gift of his blessedness and goodness through the merit of our love and obedience. The use of goodness, like the brightness of the sun, the light of fire, the scent of a perfume, benefits not the giver but the user. What we are, then, is our advance rather than his who established us in what we are; for God, not begrudging the goods that are eternal in him, takes us up into the sense and enjoyment of his blessed goodness.
2.16CSEL 22:48–49
Sed qui perfectus ac bonus, et bonitate in nos ac beatitudine sua non sine ratione ac modo usus est. nam unicuique nostrum libertatem uitae sensusque permisit, non necessitatem in alterutrum adfigens, ut unumquemque ex natura bonum malumue esse lex cogeret: sed qui nos per beniuolentiam utenda; beatitudinis suse creasset, profectum nobis ad id per meritum uitae innocentis honestaeque constituit. quid autem honoris ac prsemii bonitatis necessitas mereretur, cum malos non esse uis quaedam nobis conserta non sineret? uoluntati ergo permissa bonitas est, ut praemium sibi uoluntas bonitatis adquireret, et esset nobis aeternae huius beatitudinis profectus atque usus ex merito, non necessitas indiscreta per legem. et quamquam nos ad uoluntatem bonitatis, id est ad bene honesteque uiuendum per spem promerendae et utendse suae bonitatis inliceret, poenam tamen deuitatae et contemptae bonitatis adiecit: ut. cum libertatem nobis uoluntatis ad bonitatem promerendam reliquisset, quia meritum naturse necessitas non haberet, libertatem ipsam cotidie propositus e contrario poenae terror argueret. atque ita et per rationem sequi atque iusti ad meritum praemii permissa libertas est et per bonitatem dei ius libertatis metu constitutionis artatum est, ut bene uelle meriti spes moneret, malum nolle propositae ultionis poena suaderet.
But he who is perfect and good has used his goodness and blessedness toward us not without reason and measure. For he allowed each of us freedom of life and sense, not fixing necessity on either side, so that a law of nature would compel each to be good or evil; but having created us out of kindness to enjoy his blessedness, he appointed our advance toward it through the merit of an innocent and honourable life. For what honour and reward would a necessity of goodness deserve, if some force joined to us did not allow us to be evil? Goodness, then, was left to the will, so that the will might gain for itself the reward of goodness, and so that our advance in and enjoyment of this eternal blessedness might come from merit, not from undiscriminating necessity by law. And although he drew us to will goodness, that is, to live well and honourably, through the hope of deserving and enjoying his goodness, he also added a punishment for goodness avoided and scorned; so that, since he had left us freedom of will to deserve goodness (because necessity of nature would have no merit), the terror of punishment set daily before us on the other side might restrain that very freedom. And so through equitable and just reasoning freedom was granted for the merit of reward, and through God's goodness the right of freedom was bounded by fear of his ordinance, so that the hope of merit might counsel us to will the good, and the punishment of the vengeance set before us might persuade us not to will evil.
2.17CSEL 22:49
Itaque his, quibus ex uoluntatis libertate malitia magis placuit, ultio constituta ira esse dei creditur, non quia indemutabilis illa dei et quieta natura motu impetus turbidi incalescat, sed quod ille, qui per constitutionem p“nse maneat in p“na, sentiat sibi auctorem huius constitutionis iratum. p“na enim patientis ira esse creditur decernentis. atque ita irascitur deus, cum per p“nse dolorem iram decreti in se sentiant esse puniti, quae non per demutationem naturae in iram ex placabilitate commotae, sed ex constitutione p“nse ira sit puniendis. hanc autem p“nse constitutionem iram nuncupari atque esse, Iohannes in euangelio ostendit, dicens: natio uiperarum, quis monstrauit uobis fugere a futura ira? cum enim debitum illis esset ob impietatem suam p“nse constitutione puniri, iram tamen hanc futuram psenitentise confessione fugiebant apostolus quoque irse huius ita meminit, dicens: quia si. cum adhuc peccatores essemus, Christus pro nobis mortuus est, multo magis iustificati nunc per sanguinem eius liberabimur per illum ab ira, iram uidelicet p“nam manentis constitutionis ostendens.
So, for those who by freedom of will preferred wickedness, the vengeance appointed is believed to be the anger of God, not because that unchangeable and tranquil nature of God grows hot with a turbulent impulse, but because he who by the appointment of punishment remains in punishment feels that the author of this appointment is angry with him. For the punishment of the sufferer is believed to be the anger of the one who decrees it. And so God is angry when those punished feel through the pain of punishment that the anger of the decree is upon them; this anger is anger to those to be punished not through a change of nature moved from gentleness to anger, but from the appointment of punishment. That this appointment of punishment is called anger and is so, John shows in the Gospel, saying: "Brood of vipers, who showed you to flee from the anger to come?" For although it was due that they be punished for their ungodliness by the appointment of punishment, yet they were fleeing this coming anger by the confession of repentance. The apostle too mentions this anger, saying: "For if, while we were still sinners, Christ died for us, much more, being now justified by his blood, shall we be saved by him from anger," showing that anger is the punishment of an abiding appointment.
2.18CSEL 22:49–51
Non itaque ad demutationem deus mobilis est neque ad aliud ex alio transferendus: cum certae ipse constantisque naturae est, manet ut est, quippe qui dixerit: ego sum qui sum et non demutor. beata illa et perfecta aeternaeque uirtutis bonitas non patitur conuersionem nec demutatur ei alio in aliud motu accidentis instinctus. et hoc hic idem sic sancto spiritu loquens propheta testatur, dicens: deus iustus iudex, fortis et magnanimus, numquid irascetur per singulos dies? nisi conuertimini, gladium. suum uibrauit, arcum suum tetendit et parauit illum; et in ipso parauit uasa mortis, sagittas suas arsuris operatus est. non ergo ad iram magnanimus demutatur, sed potens iudex poenam decreuit ad culpam. nam non conuertentibus gladium uibrauit et arcum tetendit et in eo parauit uasa mortis, sagittas suas arsuris operatus est. operatus autem est non ad motum irae repentinae, quse per cupiditatem ulciscendi subito accensa sit, sed operatus arsuris est, qui per inpaenitentem uoluntatem ipsi se constituent urendos. et his, qui non conuerterentur, gladius uibratus est, non ex demutatione irae promendus ad singulos — neque enim, qui magnanimus est, per dies singulos irascitur — sed quia iudicium decreuit, gladius eius ex p“nse constitutione iam promptus est. psa autem p“nalis iudicii spiritalia ministeria in gladio, arcu, sagittisque memorantur; quae quia praeparata. habentur arsuris, non ex motu irse temporariae praeparantur, sed ea ex decreti constitutione temperatissima deus bonitatis suae aequabilitate moderatus est: non occultam scilicet constitutionis ipsius huius seueritatem et incognitam relinquendo, terroremque eius denuntiationibus praemonendo, et ipsam illam, constitutam licet, longa tamen ad peccati psenitentiam dilatione remorando.
God, then, is not moved to change, nor carried from one thing to another; since he is of a certain and constant nature, he remains as he is, for he said: "I am who I am, and I do not change." That blessed and perfect goodness of eternal power does not suffer conversion, nor is it changed from one thing to another by the movement of an accidental impulse. The same prophet, speaking thus by the Holy Spirit, testifies to this here, saying: "God is a just judge, strong and patient; will he be angry every day? Unless you turn, he has brandished his sword, he has bent his bow and made it ready; and on it he has prepared the instruments of death, he has made his arrows for those who will burn." The patient one, then, is not changed to anger, but the powerful judge has decreed punishment for guilt. For against those who do not turn he has brandished his sword, bent his bow, prepared on it the instruments of death, and made his arrows for those who will burn. He has made them, not for a movement of sudden anger suddenly kindled by desire for vengeance, but he has made them for those who will burn, who by their unrepentant will appoint themselves to be burned. And the sword has been brandished at those who would not turn, not to be drawn against each one by a change into anger (for he who is patient is not angry every day), but because he has decreed judgment, his sword is already drawn by the appointment of punishment. The spiritual instruments of punitive judgment are named in the sword, the bow, and the arrows; and because they are held prepared for those who will burn, they are not prepared from a movement of temporary anger, but God has governed them, by the appointment of his decree, most temperately with the evenness of his goodness: by not leaving the severity of this appointment hidden and unknown, by warning beforehand of its terror through his announcements, and by holding back that punishment, though appointed, with a long delay for repentance of sin.
2.19CSEL 22:51–52
Atque ideo, posteaquam fremuerunt gentes et adstiterunt reges, posteaquam inania meditantes populi in unum conuenerunt aduersus dominum Christumque eius et posteaquam inrisi subsannatique sunt, subiectum est: tunc loquetur ad eos in ira sua et in indignatione sua conturbabit eos. qualiter autem loqui semper in ira sua dominus solitus sit, coam propheticae doctrinae grauissimum et maximum adferemus. exemplum, Esaia dicente: audite uerbum domini, principes Sodomum; adtendite uerbum dei, populus Gomorrhse. quo mihi multitudinem hostiarum uestrarum? dicit dominus; plenus sum. holocausta arietum et adipem agnorum et sanguinem taurorum et hircorum nolo; nec si ueniatis apparere in conspectu meo- quis enim exquisiuit hsec de manibusuestris? — calcare aulam meam non adponetis. si adferatis similaginem, uanum est; thymiama abominatio mihi est. neomenias et sabbata et diem magnum non sustineo, ieiunium et ferias et neomenias uestras et festiuitates odit anima mea. facti estis mihi in abundantiam, iam non sustineo peccata uestra. cum extendatis manus uestras, auertam oculos meos a uobis; et si multiplicetis precem, non exaudiam uos: manus enim uestrse sanguine plenae sunt. et haec quidem atrocia et plena irse, principes Sodomum generosam Abrahae familiam nuncupari, populum Gomorrhse electum in hereditatem Israhel dici, inprobabiles esse hostias, abominabiles sollemnitates, pertsesa ieiunia. auertendi ab aspectu adeuntium oculi, obstruendae ab auditu precantium aures, quia manus sanguine plense sint: quid hac comminatione grauius est? quid his minis seuerius? sed uideamus, qualiter in ira sua deus loquatur.
And so, after the nations raged and the kings stood by, after the peoples meditating vain things gathered together against the Lord and his Christ, and after they were laughed at and mocked, there was added: "Then he will speak to them in his anger, and in his indignation he will trouble them." How the Lord has always been accustomed to speak in his anger, we shall show by the weightiest and greatest example of prophetic teaching, where Isaiah says: "Hear the word of the Lord, rulers of Sodom; attend to the word of God, people of Gomorrah. What to me is the multitude of your sacrifices? says the Lord. I am full. I do not want burnt offerings of rams, the fat of lambs, and the blood of bulls and goats; nor if you come to appear in my sight (for who required these things from your hands?) shall you continue to trample my court. If you bring fine flour, it is vain; incense is an abomination to me. Your new moons and sabbaths and the great day I cannot bear; my soul hates your fasting and holidays and new moons and festivals. You have become a surfeit to me; I can no longer bear your sins. When you stretch out your hands, I will turn my eyes away from you; and if you multiply prayer, I will not hear you; for your hands are full of blood." These things are terrible and full of anger: that the noble family of Abraham is called rulers of Sodom, that Israel, chosen as an inheritance, is called the people of Gomorrah, that the sacrifices are rejected, the solemnities abominable, the fasts loathed, the eyes turned away from the sight of those who approach, the ears closed against hearing those who pray, because their hands are full of blood. What is heavier than this threat? What more severe than these menaces? But let us see how God speaks in his anger.
2.20CSEL 22:52
Sequitur enim, posteaquam dictum est: manus uestrse sanguine plenae sunt, lauamini, mundi estote, auferte nequitias ab animis uestris, a conspectu oculorum meorum. discite bonum facere, exquirite iudicium, liberate iniuriam accipientem, iudicate pupillo et iustificate uiduam: et uenite, disputemus, dicit dominus. et si fuerint delicta uestra sicut ph“nicium, ut niuem dealbabo: si autem fuerint ut coccum, ut lanam candidam efficiam. et Hi uolueritis et exaudieritis me, quae bona sunt terrse manducabitis: quod si nolueritis neque audiueritis me, gladius uos comedet. os enim domini locutum est haec. sequitur terrorem benignitas. et quibus iam ultio criminis debita est, his adhuc superest psenitentis conscientiae beata confessio. non enim statim deus in ira sua perimit, sed loquitur et dissimulata adhuc poena tantum in indignatione perturbat. qui enim ut coccum et phoenicium erant. redundanti in manus sanguine decolores, hi in niuem albescent eruntque ueste beati uelleris candidati. et haec quidem ex auctoritate Testamenti ueteris praesumpta sint: uideamus. an etiam in nouo dei ira talis esse intellegatur, ut saluet.
For after it was said, "Your hands are full of blood," there follows: "Wash yourselves, be clean, remove the wickedness from your souls before my eyes. Learn to do good, seek judgment, rescue the one who suffers wrong, judge for the orphan and justify the widow; and come, let us reason together, says the Lord. Even if your sins are like scarlet, I will make them white as snow; and if they are like crimson, I will make them like white wool. And if you are willing and listen to me, you shall eat the good things of the land; but if you are unwilling and do not listen to me, the sword shall devour you; for the mouth of the Lord has spoken these things." Kindness follows terror. And to those to whom vengeance for crime is already due, there still remains the blessed confession of a repentant conscience. For God does not at once destroy in his anger, but speaks, and, with punishment still held back, only troubles them in indignation. Those who were like scarlet and crimson, discoloured with blood overflowing on their hands, will grow white as snow and will be made white with the garment of blessed wool. These things have been drawn from the authority of the Old Testament; let us see whether in the New too the anger of God is understood to be such that it saves.
2.21CSEL 22:52–53
Namque lohannis eos. quos esse nationem uiperarum ob malit-iam paternse se impietatis exprobrat ita ad salutem monet: facite dignum fructum psenitentise. et rursum dominus ipse: uenite ad me omnes, qui laboratis et onerati estis, et ego uos reficiam. frementibus autem aduersus se et non tantum in passione, sed etiam post passionem, non dico in unum conuenientibus, sed persecutionem ecclesiae, apostolorum fugam, caedem martyrum spirantibus deus sic loquitur iratus: Saule, Saule, quid me persequeris? ait autem: quis es, domine? dominus uero: ego sum Iesus Nazareus, quem tu persequeris. at ille tremesetpauens in eo, quod sibi acciderat, dixit: domine, quid me uis facere? sic loquitur iratus. sic in indignatione conturbat, cum, quibus ob meritum impietatis poena decreta est, ipsis per admonitionem desinendi metus et terror adfertur.
For John thus urges toward salvation those whom he reproaches as a brood of vipers because of the wickedness of their fathers' ungodliness: "Bear fruit worthy of repentance." And again the Lord himself: "Come to me, all you who labour and are burdened, and I will refresh you." And to those who raged against him not only in the passion but even after the passion, not, I say, gathering together, but breathing out persecution of the church, flight of the apostles, slaughter of martyrs, God, angry, speaks thus: "Saul, Saul, why do you persecute me?" And he said: "Who are you, Lord?" And the Lord: "I am Jesus of Nazareth, whom you persecute." And he, trembling and afraid at what had happened to him, said: "Lord, what do you want me to do?" So he speaks in anger, so he troubles in indignation, when fear and terror are brought, by warning to desist, to the very ones for whom punishment has been decreed for the merit of their ungodliness.
2.22CSEL 22:53–54
Sed ne ipsam quidem principalem et maximam loquendi in ira et in indignatione conturbandi praedicationem praetermisit propheta. namque post idquodait: tunc loquetur ad eos in ira sua et in furore suo conturbabiteos, ut ostenderet, qui ille irae sermo esset et quae ex eo conturbatio gigneretur, adiecit: ego autem constitutus sum rex ab eo super Sion montem sanctum eius, adnuntians praeceptumeius eius. dominus dixit ad me: filius meus es tu, ego hodie genui te. posce a me, et dabo tibi gentes hereditatem tuam et possessionem tuam terminos terrae. reges eos in uirga ferrea, tamquam uas figuli confringes eos. iratus loquens atque in indignatione perturbans et irascendi modum temperat et loquendi. nam neque iram dissimulat potestate praelata, neque a bonitate sua excedit terrore praemisso, ut ad pietatem nos metus eius, cuius potestas esset demonstrata, reuocaret. conturbantur ergo frementes et uana meditantes, cum regem sciunt, cum filium dei audiunt, cum possessorem eum finium terrae et heredem esse gentium discunt, cum regendi ius in uirga ferrea eius esse cognoscunt, cum modo ac facilitate uasis figuli comminuendos populos intellegunt. sic loquitur iratus, sic conturbat indignans, non puniens admissam impietatem, sed impsenitentem ad paenitentiae confessionem commemorato potestatis terrore perturbans.
But the prophet did not pass over even the chief and greatest proclamation of speaking in anger and troubling in indignation. For after saying, "Then he will speak to them in his anger, and in his fury he will trouble them," to show what that speech of anger was and what disturbance arose from it, he added: "But I have been established as king by him over Sion, his holy mountain, proclaiming his decree. The Lord said to me: You are my Son, today I have begotten you. Ask of me, and I will give you the nations as your inheritance, and the ends of the earth as your possession. You will rule them with a rod of iron; you will break them like a potter's vessel." Speaking in anger and troubling in indignation, he tempers both the manner of being angry and of speaking. For he neither hides his anger, since his power is displayed, nor departs from his goodness, since terror is sent ahead, so that fear of him whose power had been shown might call us back to godliness. So those who rage and meditate vain things are troubled when they know he is king, when they hear he is the Son of God, when they learn he is the possessor of the ends of the earth and the heir of the nations, when they recognize that the right of ruling with a rod of iron is his, when they understand that peoples are to be shattered in the manner and with the ease of a potter's vessel. So he speaks in anger, so he troubles in indignation, not punishing the ungodliness committed, but troubling the unrepentant toward the confession of repentance by recalling the terror of his power.
2.23CSEL 22:54–55
Quamquam uero per spiritum prophetise, pro gerendis gesta memorantis, quia solitus sit per non ambiguam prouidentiam gerendorum deus futura pro praeteritis significare, absolute intellegi possit, omnia hsec ex persona unigeniti filii dei domini nostri Iesu Christi dicta esse, et infidelitas maxima sit trepidum ad haec sensum ambiguae opinionis adferre, tamen etiam euangelicis atque apostolicis doctrinis ostendendum est. nihil eorum prophetam, quse gerenda praedicandaque essent, non antea prophetasse, maxime cum non exiguus ignorantibus atque simplicibus error oriatur in eo, quod dictum est: ego hodie genui te. cum enim ante tempora unigenitus dei filius maneat, non conueniens et consonans esse intellegitur, ut in die genitus sit, cum dies omnes in tempore sint. tempora enim secundum praescriptam nobis a Moyse cognitionem, in hunc suum motum atque cursum ab origine saeculi et constitutione dimensa sunt, cum per momenta et horas et menses et annum reuolubili in se successione discreta sunt; institutumque est tempus ex tempore, quia tempora omnia mutua temporum substitutio et gignit et terminat. atque ob id dies in tempore est, per quam tempus uniuersum et inchoatum desinit et desinens inchoatur. unigenitus uero filius dei, ut dei uerbum, ita est deus uerbum; non cum temporibus est, sed ante tempora; non in aliquo. sed ante omnia est. erat enim, cum tempora facta sunt, quippe qui ea fecerit. erat ergo semper. non enim est definitus in tempore, non subiectus in numerum; sed per quem est eorum omnium, quae et sunt et esse dici possunt, origo, ipse ille infinitse aeternitatis suae ortu, ut ab aeterno genitus, esse persistit. ut igitur dicti prophetici, quo ait: ego hodie genui te, ratio possit intellegi, adhibenda nobis est euangelica atque apostolica auctoritas, ut uel prophetam de apostolo uel apostolum de propheta intellegamus. tenendus autem idem euangelicorum dictorum ordo, qui psalmi est.
Through the spirit of prophecy, which records things to be done as done (since God is accustomed, through unerring foreknowledge of what is to be done, to signify future things as past), it can be fully understood that all these things were said in the person of the only-begotten Son of God, our Lord Jesus Christ, and it would be the greatest unbelief to bring to them a hesitant sense of doubtful opinion. Yet it must also be shown from the teachings of the Gospels and the apostles that the prophet prophesied beforehand nothing but what was to be done and proclaimed; especially since no small error arises for the ignorant and simple from the words, "Today I have begotten you." For since the only-begotten Son of God abides before times, it is not understood to be fitting and consistent that he was begotten on a day, since all days are in time. For times, according to the knowledge handed down to us by Moses, have been measured out in this their movement and course from the origin and foundation of the world, being divided by moments, hours, months, and the year in a succession that revolves on itself; and time is made from time, since the mutual replacement of times both begets and ends all times. And therefore a day is in time, through which the whole of time, once begun, ends, and in ending begins. But the only-begotten Son of God, as he is the Word of God, so is God the Word; he is not with times but before times; he is not in anything but before all things. For he was when times were made, since he made them. He was, therefore, always. For he is not defined in time, not subjected to number; but he through whom is the origin of all things that are and can be said to be, himself continues to be by the birth of his infinite eternity, as begotten from eternity. So that the meaning of the prophetic saying, "Today I have begotten you," may be understood, we must bring in gospel and apostolic authority, so as to understand the prophet from the apostle or the apostle from the prophet. And the same order of gospel sayings must be kept as that of the psalm.
2.24CSEL 22:55–56
Nam id primum est: ego autem constitutus sum rex ab eo super Sion montem sanctum eius. et nescio, cui Christum regem esse ambigere sit tutum, latrone hoc ipso in crucis passione confitente: memento mei, domine, cum ueneris in regnum tuum. sed non sufficit confessio latronis, regem esse profitentis. testantur etiam adoraturi magi, cum interrogant: ubi est, qui natus est rex Iudseorum? testatur et Pilatus interrogans: tu es rex Iudaeorum? profitetur et dominus respondens: tu dixisti. non negat interrogatus, nec gloriatur humiliandus ad mortem. cum non sit nisi ex responsione confessio, ita neque se protulit professionis auctorem, neque interroganti cognitionis ueritatem inuidit.
For this comes first: "But I have been established as king by him over Sion, his holy mountain." And I do not know for whom it would be safe to doubt that Christ is king, when the thief himself confessed it in the suffering of the cross: "Remember me, Lord, when you come into your kingdom." But the confession of the thief who professed him king is not enough. The magi too, coming to worship, testify when they ask: "Where is he who has been born king of the Jews?" Pilate too testifies when he asks: "Are you the king of the Jews?" And the Lord professes it, answering: "You have said so." When asked, he does not deny; about to be humbled to death, he does not boast. Since the confession came only from an answer, he neither put himself forward as the author of the profession nor begrudged the questioner the truth of knowledge.
2.25CSEL 22:56
Sed non sufficit respondisse, quod rex sit; audiamus etiam illud, et qui sit iste, qui rex est. princeps namque sacerdotum etiam cum sacramento interrogat, dicens: adiuro te per deum uiuum, ut dicas nobis si tu es Christus filius dei. et dicit illi Iesus: tu dixisti. interrogatio nunc quoque non inprobatur, sed et iactantia et gloriatio spontanese professionis effugitur; quaesita tamen ueritas non negatur. ac sic uerecundia humilitatis et ueritatis confessio temperantur, ut sit et in responsione officium et in interrogatione cognitio. sed expectandum est, qui tandem sit responsionis huius profectus, quod Christus filius dei est; nempe quid sequitur ad id, quod dictum est: tu dixisti? uerum dico uobis, a modo uidebitis filium hominis sedentem a dextris uirtutis et uenientem cum nubibus cseli. qui filius hominis est. idem et filius dei est: natura generositatis in filii hominis adsumptione non deperit. nam non idcirco non dei filius, quia et hominis filius est. non enim cum diuinitatis decessione fit humilitatis accessio; nec per consortium infirmitatis contumeliam uirtus excepit, quippe cum infirmitas honore sit donata uirtutis. nam hominis filius a dextris dei adsidet, ueniens cum nubibus caeli contuendus. quo dicto prophetia consummatur illa, quse dixit: dicit dominus domino meo: sede a dextris meis, donec ponam inimicos tuos scamillum pedum tuorum.
But it is not enough to have answered that he is king; let us also hear who this king is. For the chief priest also questions him with an oath, saying: "I adjure you by the living God to tell us whether you are the Christ, the Son of God." And Jesus says to him: "You have said so." Here too the question is not rejected, but the boasting and glorying of a spontaneous profession is avoided; yet the truth asked for is not denied. And so the modesty of humility and the confession of truth are tempered together, so that there is both courtesy in the answer and knowledge in the question. But we must wait to see what the outcome of this answer is, that the Christ is the Son of God; what, namely, follows on the words "You have said so"? "Truly I say to you, from now on you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of power and coming with the clouds of heaven." He who is Son of Man is also Son of God: the nature of his noble birth does not perish in the assumption of the Son of Man. For he is not therefore not the Son of God because he is also the son of man. The addition of lowliness does not come with a loss of divinity; nor did power receive dishonour through sharing weakness, since weakness was granted the honour of power. For the Son of Man sits at the right hand of God, to be seen coming with the clouds of heaven. By this saying that prophecy is fulfilled which said: "The Lord says to my Lord: Sit at my right hand, until I make your enemies the footstool of your feet."
2.26CSEL 22:56–57
Hic ergo rex super Sion montem sanctum dei constitutus est, praeceptum domini adnuntians: non super illum utique deperditse ciuitatis montem, conploratse scilicet et homicidae et parricidae Hierusalem; sed Hierusalem eius, quae in caelis est, quae mater est nostra, quae ciuitas regis magni est, cuius, ut existimo, hodie incolse sunt in passione domini resurgentes. dei itaque prseceptum hic rex constitutus adnuntiat, ut uenturum eum cum nubibus caeli meminissent, aduersus quem fremerent et conuenirent, ut per cognitionem diuini aduentus conturbati super contumelia inlusae humilitatis corporeae pseniterent.
This king, then, has been established over Sion, God's holy mountain, proclaiming the Lord's decree: certainly not over the mountain of that lost city, the Jerusalem that was wept over, murderous and parricidal, but over his Jerusalem which is in heaven, which is our mother, which is the city of the great king, whose inhabitants today, I think, are those who rose at the Lord's passion. So this king, established, proclaims God's decree, that those who raged and gathered against him might remember that he would come with the clouds of heaven, so that, troubled by the knowledge of the divine coming, they might repent of the insult they had offered to his bodily lowliness, which they had mocked.
2.27CSEL 22:57–58
Tenet autem ordinem prophetise euangelica doctrina. nam in eo ipso dicti utriusque ratio continetur, huius scilicet dicti: ego autem constitutus sum rex ab eo super Sion montem sanctum eius, adnuntians prseceptum eius. dominus dixit ad me: filius meus es tu, ego hodiegenui te; cum enim ait: a modo uidebitis filium hominis sedentem a dextris uirtutis, tempus, quo filius hominis, qui et Christus et dei filius est, consessu dei dignus esset, ostendit: ut, quia antea dei filius, tum quoque et hominis filius esset, id, quod tum hominis filius est, ad perfectum dei filium, id est ad resumendam indulgendamque corpori aeternitatis suae gloriam per resurrectionis potentiam gigneretur: quam gloriam a patre corporeus reposcebat. qui enim in forma dei erat, formam serui acceperat. et acceptae huic formae serui gloriam dei. in qua mansit, expostulat, dicens: pater, clarifica me apud te ipsum ea claritate, quam habui, priusquam mundus esset apud te. non noua quaerit, non aliena desiderat: esse talis, qualis fuerat, postulat et precatur id se, quod ante erat, esse, gigni scilicet ad id, quod suum fuit. non erat autem idipsum tunc totus, quod ut fieret precabatur: fieri autem totus non aliud, quam quod fuerat, postulabat. sed cum fit, quod fuit, et, quod non erat, est futurus, ad id, quod fuerat, id, quod totum non erat, quodam noui ortus nascebatur exordio. ergo hic resurrectionis suae ad adsumendam gloriam dies est, per quam ad id nascitur, quod ante tempora erat. sed nascens ad id, quod ante tempora fuit, id tamen in tempore nascitur esse, quod non erat. atque ideo filius hominis a modo adsidens uirtutis dextris est uidendus, quia natura carnis post resurrectionem glorificata ad profectum eius, quam antea habuerat, claritatis prouehebatur: cum hominis filius consessurus patri et in inmortalitatem corruptione carnis absorpta in uiuentem tunc et non moriturum amplius dei filium nasceretur.
The gospel teaching keeps the order of the prophecy. For in the same place the meaning of both sayings is contained, namely of this one: "But I have been established as king by him over Sion, his holy mountain, proclaiming his decree. The Lord said to me: You are my Son, today I have begotten you." For when he says, "From now on you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of power," he shows the time at which the Son of Man, who is also Christ and Son of God, would be worthy to sit with God: so that, since he was Son of God before and then was also son of man, what was then son of man might be begotten into the perfect Son of God, that is, for resuming and bestowing on his body the glory of his eternity through the power of the resurrection, the glory which, as one in a body, he asked back from the Father. For he who was in the form of God had taken the form of a servant. And for this form of a servant he had taken he demands the glory of God, in which he had remained, saying: "Father, glorify me with yourself with the glory which I had with you before the world was." He does not seek new things, he does not desire what is foreign; he asks to be such as he had been, and prays to be what he was before, that is, to be begotten into what was his own. He was not then wholly that which he prayed to become; but to become wholly, he asked for nothing other than what he had been. But when he becomes what he was, and is to be what he was not, then that which was not whole was being born, by a kind of beginning of a new birth, into what it had been. This, then, is the day of his resurrection for taking up glory, by which he is born into what he was before times. But being born into what he was before times, he is nevertheless born in time to be what he was not. And therefore the Son of Man is to be seen from now on sitting at the right hand of power, because the nature of the flesh, glorified after the resurrection, was being carried forward to the advance of the glory he had had before, when the son of man, about to sit with the Father, with the corruption of the flesh swallowed up into immortality, was born into the Son of God, then living and never more to die.
2.28CSEL 22:58–59
Tenuit autem beatus apostolus nouam hanc in eo temporariae huius natiuitatis discretam ab ea, quse ante tempora est, generationem et subdiuisam significationem. nam cum de beata illa et nullis circumscripta temporibus natiuitate dixisset: primogenitus omnis creaturae, quia in ipso creata sunt omnia in cselis et in terra, uisibilia et inuisibilia, primogenitum quoque etiam ex mortuis in resurrectione commemorat dicens postea: primogenitus ex mortuis, ut fieret ipse in omnibus primatum habens. nascitur enim ad id, quod non erat, cum tamen id fieret, quod fuisset. est enim primogenitus ex mortuis, qui erat primogenitus creaturae: idcirco primogenitus ex mortuis, ut maneret primogenitus creaturae. idem enim est primogenitus ex mortuis, qui erat primogenitus creaturae.
The blessed apostle held this new begetting in him, the begetting of this temporal birth, distinguished from that which is before times, and a meaning divided accordingly. For after he had said of that blessed birth, bounded by no times, "the firstborn of all creation, for in him all things were created in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible," he afterwards also mentions the firstborn from the dead in the resurrection, saying: "the firstborn from the dead, that he himself might have the first place in all things." For he is born into what he was not, though what came to be was what he had been. He is the firstborn from the dead who was the firstborn of creation; firstborn from the dead in order that he might remain firstborn of creation. For the same one is firstborn from the dead who was firstborn of creation.
2.29CSEL 22:59
Non nunc aliud est, atque antea fuit. quamuis ipse etiam aliud fuerit ex alio; sed id, quod ex alio etiam aliud fuit, in id ipsum tamen, unde antea exstitit, aliud est renatum. nam qui natus ex uirgine homo est, erat et tum dei filius: sed qui filius hominis est, idem erat et dei filius. natus autem rursum ex baptismo et tum dei filius, ut et in idipsum et in aliud nasceretur. scriptum est autem, cum ascendisset ex aqua: filius meus es tu, ego hodie genui te.. sed secundum generationem hominis renascentis tum quoque ipse deo renascebatur in filium perfectum, ut hominis filio ita et dei filio in baptismate conparato.
He is not now something other than he was before, though he himself was also another thing from another; but what was another thing from another was reborn as another thing into that very thing from which it had come before. For he who was born of the virgin as man was then also Son of God; but he who is Son of Man was the same as the Son of God. And he was born again from baptism, being then too Son of God, so that he might be born both into the same and into another. For it is written, when he had come up from the water: "You are my Son, today I have begotten you." But according to the begetting of man being reborn, he too was then being reborn to God as perfect Son, so that in baptism he was prepared as Son of God as he was as son of man.
2.30CSEL 22:59–60
Sed id, quod nunc in psalmo est: filius meus es tu, ego hodie genui te, non ad uirginis partum neque ad lauacri generationem, sed ad primogenitum ex mortuis pertinere apostolica auctoritas est. namque in libro Actuum apostolorum ita dictum est: nosque uobis euangelizamus eam, quae ad patres facta est repromissio. hanc deus expleuit filiis nostris, suscitans dominum nostrum Iesum, sicut et in psalmo primo scriptum est: filius meus es tu, ego hodie genui te, cum suscitauit eum a mortuis, amplius non regressurum in interitum. uox ergo hsec dei patris secundum apostolum in die resurrectionis existit; et uideamus an idipsum et euangelistae doceant. namque dominus resurgens tali ad apostolos usus est uoce: data est mihi potestas omnis in caelo et in terra. euntes nunc docete omnes gentes, baptizantes eas in nomine patris et filii et spiritus sancti. resurgens enim in cselo et in terra ius omne sortitus est. in eo autem quod ait: data est, poposcisse id, quod accepit, ostendit.
But by apostolic authority, what is now in the psalm, "You are my Son, today I have begotten you," refers neither to the virgin's childbearing nor to the begetting of the washing, but to the firstborn from the dead. For in the book of the Acts of the Apostles it is said thus: "And we bring you the good news of the promise made to the fathers, that God has fulfilled it for our children by raising up our Lord Jesus, as it is written in the first psalm: You are my Son, today I have begotten you, when he raised him from the dead, never again to return to corruption." According to the apostle, then, this voice of God the Father belongs to the day of the resurrection. Let us see whether the evangelists teach the same. For the Lord, rising, used these words to the apostles: "All power has been given to me in heaven and on earth. Go now, teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit." For in rising he received every right in heaven and on earth. And by saying "has been given," he shows that he asked for what he received.
2.31CSEL 22:60–61
Sequitur enim: posce a me, et dabo tibi gentes hereditatem tuam et possessionem tuam terminos terrae. accepit ergo hereditatem gentium, quam poposcit. poposcit enim cum ait: pater, uenit hora, honorifica filium tuum, ut filius honorificet te. sicut et dedisti illi potestatem omnis carnis. ut, omne quod dedisti illi, det illi uitam seternam. et rursum: non pro his rogo tantum, sed et pro his, qui credituri sunt per uerbum eorum in me. haec ergo hereditas eius, ut omni carni det uitam aeternam, ut omnes gentes baptizatae atque doctae regenerentur in uitam; non iam secundum diuinam illam Moysi cantionem angelorum dominatui deditae neque secundum eorundem numerum diuisae, sed in dominicam familiam susceptae et in domesticos dei deputatse et ex iniusto atque peccatore et peruerso iure dominantium in regnum seternum diuinumque translatae. neque enim adhuc tantum portio domini Israhel, neque funiculum hereditatis eius Iacob, sed gentes omnes, secundum numerum angelorum ante diuisae, nunc iam unius atque unus omnis hsec uniuersitas gentium dei populus est: et aeterna haec omnium ex mortuis resurgentium primogeniti huius ex mortuis aeterni heredis hereditas est.
For there follows: "Ask of me, and I will give you the nations as your inheritance, and the ends of the earth as your possession." He received, then, the inheritance of the nations which he asked for. For he asked when he said: "Father, the hour has come; glorify your Son, that the Son may glorify you, as you have given him power over all flesh, that he may give eternal life to all whom you have given him." And again: "I do not pray for these only, but also for those who will believe in me through their word." This, then, is his inheritance: that he gives eternal life to all flesh, that all nations, baptized and taught, are reborn into life; no longer, according to that divine song of Moses, handed over to the dominion of angels nor divided according to their number, but received into the Lord's household, reckoned among the members of God's family, and transferred from the unjust, sinful, and perverse right of those who ruled them into the eternal and divine kingdom. For no longer is Israel alone the portion of the Lord, nor Jacob the measuring line of his inheritance, but all nations, formerly divided according to the number of the angels, now this whole universe of nations is the people of the one God, and all of it is one; and this is the eternal inheritance, consisting of all who rise from the dead, of this firstborn from the dead, the eternal heir.
2.32CSEL 22:61–62
In eo autem, quod subiectum est: et possessionem tuam terminos terrae, non est existimandum, quod id ipsum repetitus sermo significet, tamquam illi sola gentium terras inhabitantium donata possessio sit. non enim ait: et possessionem tuam usque ad terminos terrae, sed terminos terrae. ab eo autem, quod terminatur, id, quod terminat, differt. neque id ipsum est finitum atque finire. neque unum est modum sumere atque moderari: quorum aliud interius modum accipit, aliud exterius quodam ambitu suo obiectuque moderatur. non enim ita in profundum demersa terra est aut in latitudinem extensa aut prolata in altum est, ut non undique secus aut circumfusse aut subiacentis sibi naturae contineatur obiectu. hanc enim infernae uastitudinis demersa et inmensa abyssus sustentat, hanc circumfusi et superni aeris spiritus inumbrat atque ambit. quod autem subiecta sibi abysso suspensa sit, propheta testatur dicens: ipse super maria fundauit eam et super flumina prseparauit eam. et rursum: qui firmauit terram super aquas. et hanc inmensam atque infinitam uastitatem abyssum scriptura solita est nuncupare, cum Iona intra cetum orat et dicit: abyssus multa circumfudit me. atque hsec quidem infinita inmensitas, quae secundum uerbi proprietatem in abysso significari intellegitur, spiritali diuinae substantiae est circumscripta uirtute secundum illud apostoli: quoniam omnia in ipso et per ipsum, ipsi gloria in saecula saeculorum. esse autem infernae huius regionis uastseque abyssus incolas plures, beati Iohannis Apocalypsi docemur, cum nullus, neque in caelo, neque supra terram, neque infra terram obsignatum librum dignus est repertus aperire. non utique de mortuis et in terram sepultis significare intellegitur, cum ad tertii incolatus demonstrationem non qui intra terram, sed qui infra terram, neque qui mortui sunt, sed qui uiuunt, nullum in se resignandi libri habuerint auctorem. cum ergo possessio terrae finium domino donatur, non tam terra donatur, quam ea, quibus terra finitur. terrae enim terminos, quibus terra ipsa determinatur, accepit.
In what was added, "and the ends of the earth as your possession," it must not be thought that the repeated expression signifies the same thing, as though only the possession of the nations inhabiting the lands had been given him. For it does not say "and as your possession up to the ends of the earth," but "the ends of the earth." What bounds differs from what is bounded. Being finished and finishing are not the same, nor is receiving a limit the same as limiting: one receives its limit from within, the other limits from outside by its circuit and the way it lies against it. For the earth is not so sunk in depth, extended in breadth, or raised in height that it is not contained on every side by a nature either poured around it or lying beneath it. The sunken and immeasurable abyss of the vast underworld sustains it; the breath of the air poured around and above overshadows and surrounds it. That it is suspended over the abyss beneath it, the prophet testifies, saying: "He founded it upon the seas, and prepared it upon the rivers." And again: "Who established the earth upon the waters." And Scripture is accustomed to call this immeasurable and boundless vastness the abyss, as when Jonah prays inside the whale and says: "The great abyss surrounded me." And this boundless immensity, which is understood to be signified, according to the proper sense of the word, by the abyss, is bounded by the spiritual power of the divine substance, according to the apostle's saying: "For all things are in him and through him; to him be glory for ever and ever." That there are many inhabitants of this infernal region and vast abyss we are taught by the Apocalypse of blessed John, where no one, in heaven, on the earth, or under the earth, was found worthy to open the sealed book. This is certainly not understood to refer to the dead buried in the earth, since, to show a third realm of inhabitants, those who are not within the earth but under the earth, not those who are dead but those who live, had among them no one to unseal the book. When, then, the possession of the ends of the earth is given to the Lord, it is not so much the earth that is given as the things by which the earth is bounded. For he received the ends of the earth, by which the earth itself is bounded.
2.33CSEL 22:62–63
Cuius rei sacramentum omne beatus apostolus Paulus, quippe cuius ore Christus de se est locutus, exposuit dicens: qui cum in forma dei esset. non rapinam existimauit se esse aequalem deo, sed se exinaniuit formam serui accipiens, in similitudine hominis constitutus et habitu repertus ut homo: humiliauit se factus obaudiens usque ad mortem, mortem autem crucis: propter quod et deus illum exaltauit et donauit illi nomen, quod est super omne nomen, ut in nomine Iesu omne genu curuet caelestium et terrestrium et infernorum, et omnis lingua confiteatur. quia dominus Iesus Christus in gloria dei patris. in forma itaque dei manens formam serui accepit, scilicet ex deo homo natus. et post mortem crucis in nomen, quod super omne nomen est, exaltatur: in deum namque, quia nullum ultra deum nomen est, prouehitur, eique hoc petenti, id est, ut esset, quod fuerat ante, donatur. formam enim serui in forma dei manens sumpserat. accepit deinde possessionem finium terrae. id est, ut in nomine Iesu omne genu flectat caelestium et terrestrium et infernorum, et omnis lingua confiteatur, quia dominus Iesus in gloria dei patris: non terra solum, sed superna etiam infernaque donantur et ea, quibus terra concluditur. et in gloria dei patris hodie genitus nascitur, id est in manentem antea dei formam per praemium mortis formae seruilis adsumptio honestatur; fitque sub tempore noua nec tamen inusitata natiuitas, cum ad resumendam gloriam dei patris, qui ex forma dei forma serui erat repertus, primogenitus ex mortuis nasceretur.
The blessed apostle Paul, through whose mouth Christ spoke of himself, set out the whole mystery of this, saying: "Who, though he was in the form of God, did not consider it robbery to be equal to God, but emptied himself, taking the form of a servant, made in the likeness of man and found in appearance as a man; he humbled himself, becoming obedient to death, even death on a cross. Therefore God also exalted him and gave him the name that is above every name, that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven and on earth and under the earth, and every tongue confess that the Lord Jesus Christ is in the glory of God the Father." So, remaining in the form of God, he took the form of a servant, that is, from God he was born man. And after the death of the cross he is exalted to the name that is above every name: for he is raised up into God, since there is no name beyond God, and this is granted him when he asks it, namely, that he should be what he had been before. For remaining in the form of God he had taken the form of a servant. Then he received the possession of the ends of the earth, that is, that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven and on earth and under the earth, and every tongue confess that the Lord Jesus is in the glory of God the Father: not only the earth but also things above and below, and the things by which the earth is enclosed, are given. And in the glory of God the Father he is born, begotten today; that is, the assumption of the form of a servant is honoured, as the reward of death, in the form of God which remained before. And a birth takes place in time, new yet not unheard of, when he who from the form of God had been found in the form of a servant was born firstborn from the dead to resume the glory of God the Father.
2.34CSEL 22:63
Sequitur deinde: reges eos in uirga ferrea, tamquam uas figuli confringes eos. multis aut male opinantibus aut uirtutem et proprietatem dictorum diuinorum ignorantibus aduersa haec esse bonitati dei uidentur, utgentes, quas filius dei in possessionem poposcit et in hereditatem accepit, terrore uirgse ferreae regat et modo uasis figuli confringat. neque enim boni cuiusquam est dare et accipere perdenda. et qui mauult peccatorum paenitentiam quam mortem, non existimatur secundum professionem naturae suse esse facturus, si uirga ferrea confringat, quos dari sibi in hereditatem poposcit.
Then follows: "You will rule them with a rod of iron; you will break them like a potter's vessel." To many, who either think wrongly or do not know the power and proper sense of the divine words, these things seem contrary to the goodness of God: that the Son of God should rule with the terror of a rod of iron the nations he asked for as a possession and received as an inheritance, and break them in the manner of a potter's vessel. For it is not like any good person to give and to receive what is to be destroyed. And he who prefers the repentance of sinners to their death is not thought likely to act according to the declaration of his nature if he breaks with a rod of iron those he asked to be given him as an inheritance.
2.35CSEL 22:63–64
Et primum, ne quis temerarise huic et impiae prsesumptioni locus pateat, proprietates ipsae uerborum in romanam linguam translatorum cognoscendae sunt. namque id, quod nobiscum est: reges eos in uirga ferrea, quamquam ipsum regesnon tyrannicum neque iniustum sit, sed ex aequitatis ac moderationis arbitrio regimen rationale demonstret, tamen molliorem adhuc regentis adfectum proprietas graeca significat. quod enim nobiscum est: reges eos, cum illis est ποιμανεῖς αὐτούς, id est pastoraliter reges, regendi scilicet eos curam adfectu pastoris habiturus: ipse est enim pastor bonus, cuius nos sumus oues, pro quibus animam suam posuit. ne autem ius tyrannicum significari arbitremur in uirga, quae in uirgae nuncupatione proprietas sit, ex nouo et ueteri Testamento noscendum est.
First, so that no room may be open for this rash and ungodly presumption, the proper senses of the words translated into the Roman tongue must be known. For what we have, "You will rule them with a rod of iron," although "rule" itself is not tyrannical or unjust but shows a rational governance by the judgment of equity and moderation, yet the Greek proper sense signifies a still gentler disposition in the ruler. For where we have "you will rule them," they have poimaneis autous, that is, "you will rule them as a shepherd," since he will have the care of ruling them with a shepherd's affection; for he is the good shepherd, whose sheep we are, for whom he laid down his life. And so that we may not think tyrannical right is signified by the rod, the proper sense of the word "rod" is to be learned from the New and Old Testaments.
2.36CSEL 22:64
Beatus Paulus ad Corinthios scribens, quos ex multis peccatis ad psenitentiam moderata atque utili adhortatione reuocabat, ait: quid uultis? inuirga ueniam ad uos an in caritate et spiritu mansuetudinis? numquid Paulo ius prsetorium erat, ut uirgam comminaretur et cum officio lictoris ad ecclesiam Christi adesset? non utique ita opinandum est. sed quia omnis dei sermo, quo ex errore in ueritatem retrahimur, quo per comminationem terroremque iudicii ad innocentis et sanctae uitae uiam regimur, uirga est nuncupatus, per quam, intra disciplinam diuini metus cohibiti, moderati ac prouidentis rectoris monitu cohercemur, beatus apostolus condicionem eligendi aduentus sui his, quos monebat, adiecit, utrum mallent eum in seueritate doctrinae atque obiurgationis adesse, an in spiritu lenitatis. quod utrumque secundum modestise tenorem erat necessarium, ut ob“dientibus lenior, insolentibus uero seuerior adueniret. et hoc quidem ex noui Testamenti auctoritate prsesumptum est.
The blessed Paul, writing to the Corinthians, whom he was calling back from many sins to repentance by moderate and useful exhortation, says: "What do you wish? Shall I come to you with a rod, or in love and a spirit of gentleness?" Did Paul have a governor's right, so that he could threaten a rod and come to the church of Christ with the office of a lictor? Certainly that is not to be thought. But since every word of God by which we are drawn back from error to truth, by which through the threat and terror of judgment we are guided to the way of an innocent and holy life, is called a rod, by which, held within the discipline of divine fear, we are restrained by the warning of a moderate and provident ruler, the blessed apostle offered those he was warning the choice of how he should come: whether they preferred him to be present in the severity of teaching and rebuke or in a spirit of gentleness. Both were necessary according to the course of moderation, so that he might come more gently to the obedient and more severely to the insolent. This has been drawn from the authority of the New Testament.
2.37CSEL 22:64–65
Hanc autem uerbi doctrinam uirgam nuncupari ex ueteri ita cognitum est, cum dicitur: uirga directionis uirga regni tui; quia haec eadem est uirgae directio, qua per doctrinam in aequam uiam utilemque dirigimur, et quae uirga regni est, necesse est ipsa illa doctrina sit regni. ipsum autem dominum nostrum ob doctrinae sure utilem ac moderatam prsedicationem uirgam nuncupatum ita accepimus dicente Esaia: exiet, inquit, uirga de radice Iesse. ac ne tyrannicam in eo seueritatem per uirgae nuncupationem auderet quisquam opinari, continuo propheticus sermo subiecit: et flos de radice ascendet et requiescet spiritus dei super eum, ut uirgae seueritatem floris suauitas temperaret, cum unicuique nostrum doctrinae terror regimen perfectae beatitudinis admoueret. in hac ergo uirga reget datas sibi gentes: non corruptibili, non caduca, non fragili, sed ferrea, id est ualidissima et pro naturae suae soliditate firmissima.
That this teaching of the word is called a rod is known from the Old Testament thus, where it is said: "A rod of uprightness is the rod of your kingdom"; for the uprightness of the rod is the same as that by which we are directed through teaching into a straight and useful way, and what is the rod of the kingdom must necessarily be the very teaching of the kingdom. We have learned that our Lord himself is called a rod because of the useful and moderate proclamation of his teaching, as Isaiah says: "A rod shall come out of the root of Jesse." And so that no one should dare to suppose a tyrannical severity in him from the name "rod," the prophetic word added at once: "And a flower shall rise up from the root, and the Spirit of God shall rest upon him," so that the sweetness of the flower might temper the severity of the rod, while the terror of the teaching brings to each of us the governance of perfect blessedness. With this rod, then, he will rule the nations given him: not corruptible, not perishable, not fragile, but of iron, that is, most strong and, by the solidity of its nature, most firm.
2.38CSEL 22:65–66
Hac ergo uirga ferrea ut reget, ita et confringet uel conteret; nam magis hoc secundum septuaginta translatores graecitatis proprietas enuntiat. ita enim scriptum est: ὡς σκεῦος κεραμέως συντρίψεις αὐτούς. sed siue conterat, siue confringat, non idcirco existimandus est hereditatem poscere. ut eam ad perdendum atque abolendum confringat et conterat: quippe cui cor contritum sacrificium sit optimum. contritio ergo illa siue confractio est, quse in nobis corporeas uoluptates et saecularium uitiorum incentiua conminuit dignosque nos dignatione domini praestabit secundum dictum prophetae: cor contritum et humiliatum deus non spernet. conparata autem uasis figuli confractio quantam absolutionem intellegentiae huius inpertitur? non enim sine causa quos in hereditatem poposcit, uirga ferrea regens tamquam uas figuli confringet: nisi quod conparationis exemplo fragmenti istius modi damnum proficere in restaurationem eiusdem uasis ostendit.
With this rod of iron, then, as he will rule, so he will also break or crush; for the proper sense of the Greek according to the seventy translators expresses this rather. For it is written thus: hōs skeuos kerameōs syntripseis autous. But whether he crushes or breaks, he is not therefore to be thought to ask for an inheritance in order to break and crush it for destruction and abolition, since to him a contrite heart is the best sacrifice. That contrition or breaking, then, is the one that crushes in us bodily pleasures and the incentives of worldly vices and will make us worthy of the Lord's favour, according to the prophet's saying: "A contrite and humbled heart God will not despise." And how much clarity of understanding does the comparison with breaking a potter's vessel bring? For it is not without reason that he will break like a potter's vessel those whom he asked for as an inheritance, ruling them with a rod of iron, except that by the example of the comparison he shows that the loss of such a breakage serves for the restoration of the same vessel.
2.39CSEL 22:66–67
Qualis autem a deo secundum uas figuli nostra confractio sit, idem docuit per Hieremiam prophetam, dicens: surge et descende in domum figuli, et ibi audies uerba mea. et descendi in domum figuli, et ecce ipse faciebat opus super lapides. et cecidit uas, quod faciebat in manibus eius; et iterum ipse faciebat uas aliud secundum quod placuit in conspectu eius ut faceret. et factum est uerbum domini ad me, dicens: sisecundum figulum hunc non possum facere uos, domus Israhel? ecce sicut Iutumfiguli uos estis in manibus meis. in summa loquar super gentem aut super regnum, ut feriam eos et perdam: et si conuersa fuerit gens illa a malis suis, psenitebo de malis, quae cogitabam facere illis. et in summa loquar super gentem et regnum, ut resedificem et plantem. et facient mala ante me, ut ne audiant uocem meam; et psenitebo de bonis, quae locutus sum facere illis. sic petitas atque obtentas hereditatis suse gentes deus confringet. et conteret, ut reformet. confringet enim in omnibus omnes inexplebiles cupiditates et inlecebrosas lasciuias et feruentes iras et inanes superstitiones et tumentes fastus et impias opiniones. reformat autem nos ad rationabilem uitae usum contemptu pecuniae, luxus pudore, irae moderatione, ueri scientia, communione uiuendi, religionis officiis, cum per doctrinae regimen terroremque iudicii in has uirtutes post uitia illa reuiuescimus. non enim ait: tamquam uas figulum confringes, ne per testee fragmentum inreformabile uas posset intellegi; sed ait: uas figuli, quod in ipsa artificis molitione uas fieret, ut secundum prselatum exemplum prompta esset confracti eiusdem uasis ex artificis uoluntate reparatio.
What kind of breaking we undergo from God, like a potter's vessel, he taught through the prophet Jeremiah, saying: "Arise and go down to the potter's house, and there you will hear my words. And I went down to the potter's house, and behold, he was making a work on the stones. And the vessel he was making fell in his hands; and again he made another vessel, as it pleased him in his sight to make it. And the word of the Lord came to me, saying: Can I not do with you as this potter, house of Israel? Behold, like the potter's clay you are in my hands. At last I will speak concerning a nation or a kingdom, to strike them and destroy them; and if that nation turns from its evils, I will repent of the evils I intended to do to them. And at last I will speak concerning a nation and a kingdom, to rebuild and to plant; and they will do evil before me, so as not to hear my voice; and I will repent of the good I said I would do to them." So God will break the nations of his inheritance, asked for and obtained, and crush them in order to remake them. For he will break in all of them all insatiable desires, seductive lusts, burning angers, empty superstitions, swelling pride, and ungodly opinions. And he remakes us for a rational use of life by contempt of money, shame at luxury, moderation of anger, knowledge of truth, fellowship in living, and the duties of religion, when through the governance of teaching and the terror of judgment we come alive again in these virtues after those vices. For he does not say "you will break them like a potsherd," lest a vessel that cannot be remade be understood through the fragment of a broken pot; but he says "a potter's vessel," which was becoming a vessel in the very work of the craftsman, so that, according to the example given, the repair of the same broken vessel by the will of the craftsman might be ready at hand.
2.40CSEL 22:67
Sed inrationabilis materiae uas etiam sub alia intellegentia ad rationem humanse uoluntatis aptatum est: homines quidem per haec uitia sua cadere, sed si in his pseniterent, id est, si ab his desinerent, se quoque deus in his, qui? ad poenam casus huius constituerit, paenitere, non quod hic motus mentis secundum humanam naturam in deum caderet, sed quia homini gestorum psenitentia modus est gerendorum: paenitentiam quoque suam deus memorat ad poenam, quia puniri desinerent, qui esse impii destitissent. ut ergo figulo promptum est amissum uas ad eandem, uel quam uolet, speciem reformare, ita deo facile est, post uitiorum casus uolentes se erigi per doctrinae suae institutionem ad pietatem ex impietate reparare.
But the vessel of irrational matter has also been fitted, under another understanding, to the reasoning of the human will: men fall through these vices of theirs, but if they repent in them, that is, if they cease from them, God too repents in the case of those whom he had appointed to punishment for this fall; not that this movement of mind falls upon God according to human nature, but because for man repentance of deeds done is the measure of deeds to be done, God too speaks of his repentance with respect to punishment, because those who have ceased to be ungodly would cease to be punished. As, then, it is easy for a potter to remake a lost vessel into the same form, or any he wishes, so it is easy for God, after the falls of vices, to restore from ungodliness to godliness those who wish to be raised up through the instruction of his teaching.
2.41CSEL 22:67–68
Sed et illa tamquam uas figuli non ignoranda confractio est, tum cum his corporibus dissolutis et casu mortis confractis pro uoluntate artificis restauratio adferetur. quod utrumque propheticus sermo significasse eodem dicto uidetur. nam cum paenitentiam utilem in his, quae antea agebantur, ostendit, praesentis huius uitae et corporalis ex uitiis in uirtutem nonam quasi instaurationem docet esse oportere, ira in eos dei sicuti criminum uoluntate cessante. et quamquam id ex figuli conparatione protulerit, tamen, cum de eodem figulo ait: et ipse fecit uas aliud secundum quod placuit in conspectu eius, significari intellegitur etiam illa, quae secundum dei uoluntatem resurgentium corporum instauratio est futura. prout ei enim placet et in conspectu eius dignum est, confracta reparabit, non ex alia aliqua, sed ex uetere atque ipsa originis suae materie speciem illis conplaciti sibi decoris inpertiens: ut corruptibilium corporum in incorruptionis gloriam resurrectio non interitu naturam perimat, sed qualitatis condicione demutet. non enim aliud corpus, quamuis in aliud resurget, apostolo dicente: seminatur in corruptela, resurgit in incorruptione; seminatur in ignominia, resurgit in gloria; seminatur in infirmitate, resurgit in uirtute; seminatur corpus animale, surgit corpus spiritale. fit ergo demutatio, sed non adfertur abolitio. et cum id, quod fuit, in id, quod non fuit, surgit, non amisit originem, sed profecit ad honorem. confringi itaque nos, tamquam uas figuli, uel nunc, uel tunc gaudeamus: ut et nunc, modo figuli uasis, conmortui et consepulti domino in baptismate in nouitate uitae ambulemus et in nouum Christi hominem deposito uetere renascamur, et tunc per hunc nouae natiuitatis profectum in beatam illam ac deo placentem iteratae reparationis nostrae speciem reformemur.
But that breaking like a potter's vessel must also not be overlooked which will take place when these bodies have been dissolved and broken by the fall of death, and restoration is brought according to the craftsman's will. The prophetic word seems to have signified both by the same saying. For when it shows that repentance in what was done before is profitable, it teaches that there must be a kind of new restoration of this present bodily life from vices to virtue, the anger of God against them ceasing as the will to crime ceases. And although it brought this forward from the comparison of the potter, yet when it says of the same potter, "And he made another vessel as it pleased him in his sight," there is understood to be signified also that restoration of rising bodies which will take place according to God's will. For as it pleases him and is worthy in his sight, he will repair what is broken, not from some other matter but from the old and very matter of their origin, giving them the form of beauty pleasing to him; so that the resurrection of corruptible bodies into the glory of incorruption does not destroy their nature by annihilation but changes it by the condition of its quality. For it is not another body, though it will rise into something other, as the apostle says: "It is sown in corruption, it rises in incorruption; it is sown in dishonour, it rises in glory; it is sown in weakness, it rises in power; it is sown a natural body, it rises a spiritual body." There is change, then, but no abolition. And when what was rises into what it was not, it has not lost its origin but has advanced to honour. Let us rejoice, then, to be broken like a potter's vessel both now and then: so that now, in the manner of a potter's vessel, having died with and been buried with the Lord in baptism, we may walk in newness of life and be reborn into the new man of Christ, having put off the old; and then, through this advance of the new birth, we may be remade into that blessed form, pleasing to God, of our repeated restoration.
2.42CSEL 22:68–70
Cuius boni non ignarus propheta post haec hortatur et dicit: et nunc reges intellegite, erudimini qui iudicatis terram. seruite domino in timore et exultate cum tremore. adprehendite disciplinam, ne forte irascatur dominus, et pereatis de uia iusta. cum exarserit in breui ira eius, beati omnes, qui confidunt in e u m. doctrinae hic ordo utilissimus est, ut eorum, in quae nos adhortetur, beatitudinem cognitam praestet; quia difficile sit animum ac spem ad ignorata protendere. uolens igitur propheta ad eorum nos, quae superius commemorauerat, intellegentiam cohortari intellegentiae ipsius honorem ante memorauit, dicens: et nunc reges intellegite, eos scilicet, qui intellecturi essent, reges esse demonstrans. sed quserendum est, quos reges ad intellegentiam propheticae huius adhortationis admoneat, ne forte quisquam eos significari intellegat, quorum nunc in humana corpora et in bellorum ministeria et in metum gentium regnum est. non sunt autem hi aeterni et beati apud deum reges, quippe cum ipsi iam mandatis dei excidant et. diabolo in regnum sint deputati, dicente eodem, cum dominum temptaret: et duxit illum diabolus in montem altissimum et ostendit illi omnia regna orbis terrse? in momento temporis; ait ad illum diabolus: tibi dabo potestatem hanc et gloriam eorum, quia mihi tradita sunt. alios autem nobis reges euangelia demonstrant, scilicet in quos adpropinquauit dei regnum et eos, qui regnans in se peccatum deuicerint, qui sui ipsius corporis reges sunt, dominatui suo uniuersa uitiorum incentiua subdentes: hoc enim in nobis est dei regnum. sic iterum Christus regnat in nobis, cam per eum ipsi dominorum in nos iure regnamus secundum quod dictum est: non uenit regnum dei cum obseruatione, neque dicent: eccehic, ecce illic. ecce enim regnum dei intra uos est. huius regni beatus apostolus meminit Corinthiis scribens: iam sine nobis regnatis; et utinam regnaretis, ut et nos uobiscum conregnaremus. hoc itaque regnum dei est, ubi peccatum uincitur, ubi mors perimitur, ubi non regnat hostis: mors enim regnauit ab Adam usque ad Moysen; et apostolus ait: iam non regnet in uobis peccatum. per hoc dei regnum regno peccati dissoluto ipsisque iam nobis regibus regno aduersante subuerso hoc nobis dei regnum est, cum omnibus uitiorum nostrorum aculeis contusis labes erit corporeae infirmitatis absorpta.
Not ignorant of this good, the prophet after this exhorts and says: "And now, kings, understand; be instructed, you who judge the earth. Serve the Lord in fear and rejoice with trembling. Lay hold of discipline, lest the Lord be angry and you perish from the just way. When his anger is kindled in a short time, blessed are all who trust in him." This order of teaching is most useful, that it makes known the blessedness of what it exhorts us to; for it is hard to stretch the mind and hope toward what is unknown. So the prophet, wishing to exhort us to understand what he had recounted above, first mentioned the honour of understanding itself, saying, "And now, kings, understand," showing that those who would understand are kings. But we must ask which kings he urges to understand this prophetic exhortation, lest anyone think those are signified whose kingdom now is over human bodies, the services of war, and the fear of nations. These are not eternal and blessed kings with God, since they already fall away from God's commandments and have been assigned to the devil for his kingdom, as he said when he tempted the Lord: "And the devil led him up a very high mountain and showed him all the kingdoms of the world in a moment of time; and the devil said to him: I will give you this power and their glory, for they have been handed over to me." But the Gospels show us other kings: those to whom the kingdom of God has drawn near, and those who have overcome sin reigning in them, who are kings of their own body, subjecting all the incentives of vices to their rule; for this is the kingdom of God in us. So again Christ reigns in us when through him we ourselves reign with the right of lords over ourselves, according to the saying: "The kingdom of God does not come with observation, nor will they say: Behold here, behold there. For behold, the kingdom of God is within you." The blessed apostle mentions this kingdom, writing to the Corinthians: "Already you reign without us; and would that you did reign, that we also might reign with you." This, then, is the kingdom of God, where sin is conquered, where death is destroyed, where the enemy does not reign; for "death reigned from Adam to Moses," and the apostle says, "Let sin no longer reign in you." Through this kingdom of God, when the kingdom of sin has been dissolved and the opposing kingdom overthrown, we ourselves being kings, this is the kingdom of God for us, when, all the stings of our vices having been crushed, the stain of bodily weakness will be swallowed up.
2.43CSEL 22:70
Hos itaque reges propheta ad intellegendum cohortatur, ut sciant, aduersus dominum et Christum eius fremuisse reges et populos uana meditatos; intellegant quoque ridentem e cselis. et in ira loquentem et super Sion montem sanctum regem constitutum, praecepta. dei patris adnuntiantem; cognoscantque eum, qui sit genitus in filium, tempus quoque illud, quo, qui tempora fecit, sit in tempore genitus; intellegant, in quo et hereditatem gentium et possessionem terrae finium postulauit; non ignorent etiam, quae hsec uirga sit ferrea, qua regens eos modo uasis figuli confringat. haec enim intellegentes sacramentum omne diuinae uoluntatis agnoscent: et cum per oboedientiam praeceptorum heredes dei patris, coheredes autem domini nostri Iesu Christi erunt, per id, quod aeterno regi coheredes sunt, id necesse est consequantur, ut reges sint.
These kings, then, the prophet urges to understand: that they may know that kings raged and peoples meditated vain things against the Lord and his Christ; that they may understand also the one laughing from heaven and speaking in anger, and the king established over Sion, the holy mountain, proclaiming the decrees of God the Father; that they may recognize who was begotten as Son, and also the time at which he who made times was begotten in time; that they may understand in what he asked for the inheritance of the nations and the possession of the ends of the earth; and that they may not be ignorant what this rod of iron is with which, ruling them, he breaks them like a potter's vessel. For understanding these things they will recognize the whole mystery of the divine will; and since through obedience to the commandments they will be heirs of God the Father and co-heirs of our Lord Jesus Christ, it necessarily follows that, being co-heirs of the eternal king, they are kings.
2.44CSEL 22:70–72
Testantibus itaque euangeliis atque apostolo de regibus sequens est, ut cognoscamus, qui sint iudices terrae, quos adaeque reges oporteat erudiri: maxime cum reges nudo tantum nomine sine regni alicuius designatione cognominet, ut eos suos atque in se esse reges doceret, indices autem terrae dicat. differre uero iudicem atque regem, ipso usu terrense) consuetudinis noscimus; quia non idem sit regnare, quod iudicare, quia regnum dominatio sit, iudicium uero modus sit aequitatis. sancti ergo quique intellegendi sunt esse iudices terrae, quorum uita atque fides infidelium iniquorumque iudicium sit. et hoc dominus in euangeliis ostendit dicens: uiri Nineuitae surgent in iudicio et iudicabunt generationem hanc, quia paenitentiam egerunt in praedicatione Ionae; etecce maior hic quam Iona. regina Austri surget in. iudicio et iudicabit generationem hanc, quia uenit ab ultimis partibus terrae audire sapientiam Salomonis; et ecce maior hic Salomone. tales erunt iudices terrae, quorum conparatio fidei ac timoris inpaenitentes impiosque condemnet. si enim psenitentia Nineuitum ex Ionse praedicatione suscepta fructum adepta est psenitendi, necesse est oboediens eorum psenitentia insolentem horum inpaenitentiam iudicabit. aut regina Austri ex ultimis partibus terrae desideratam Salomonis sapientiam audiens nonne infidelitatem et incuriam praesentium auditione peregrina damnabit? cum tamen inob“dientise atque inaudientiae iudicium differens a Salomone atque Iona. Christus auctor adcumulet. absolute autem hos esse iudices terrae apostolus demonstrat dicens: an nescitis, quia sancti mundum iudicabunt, et in uobis iudicatur hic mundus? cum per meritum adeptse beatitudinis criminosorum uitam sanctitas conparata condemnet.
Since the Gospels and the apostle have testified about the kings, it follows that we should learn who the judges of the earth are, who likewise must be instructed; especially since he calls the kings by the bare name, without designation of any kingdom, to teach that they are kings of themselves and in themselves, but speaks of judges "of the earth." That a judge and a king differ we know from the very usage of earthly custom, for reigning is not the same as judging: kingship is dominion, judgment the measure of equity. So all the saints are to be understood as judges of the earth, whose life and faith are the judgment of the unbelieving and unjust. The Lord shows this in the Gospels, saying: "The men of Nineveh will rise in the judgment and will judge this generation, because they repented at the preaching of Jonah; and behold, something greater than Jonah is here. The queen of the South will rise in the judgment and will judge this generation, because she came from the ends of the earth to hear the wisdom of Solomon; and behold, something greater than Solomon is here." Such will be the judges of the earth, whose faith and fear, by comparison, condemn the unrepentant and ungodly. For if the repentance of the Ninevites, undertaken at Jonah's preaching, gained the fruit of repentance, their obedient repentance must judge the insolent impenitence of these. Or will not the queen of the South, hearing the longed-for wisdom of Solomon from the ends of the earth, condemn by her foreign hearing the unbelief and carelessness of those present? Christ, the author, increases the judgment of disobedience and unwillingness to hear, since he differs from Solomon and Jonah. And the apostle plainly shows that these are the judges of the earth, saying: "Do you not know that the saints will judge the world, and the world is judged by you?", since holiness, by comparison, through the merit of the blessedness it has attained, condemns the life of the guilty.
2.45CSEL 22:72
Intellegentise autem huius atque eruditionis opus continuo propheta subiecit, dicens: seruite domino in timore et exultate cum tremore. non securum patitur aut neglegens esse seruitium: uult in omni seruitutis officio admisceri timorem. ut enim metuentes serui diligentius dominis carnalibus seruiunt, cum uoluntatem sollertioris obsequii metus obsequellse admixtus eliciat. ita et deo seruientes, si timeant per inminentem timorem, non neglegentes in ea erunt, quam susceperint, seruitute. ac ne tyrannici terroris hic metus esse fidelium crederetur, ad id, quod dixerat: seruite in timore, adiecit: et exultate: ut metum seruitutis gaudii exultatio temperaret, cum ipse timor causam laetitiae per conscientiam seruitii fidelis adferret. porro autem, ne libertas gaudii fines congruae moderationis excederet, ita subdidit: exultate in tremore, quia periculosa ad obliuionem timoris esset libera a tremore laetitia. atque ita haec prophetici eloquii ratio seruata est, ut seruitutem timor detineret, timorem exultatio moderaretur, et exultationem tremor consequens contineret.
The prophet at once added the work of this understanding and instruction, saying: "Serve the Lord in fear and rejoice with trembling." He does not allow service to be careless or negligent; he wants fear mixed into every duty of service. For as fearful slaves serve their earthly masters more diligently, since fear mixed with obedience draws out the will to a more careful compliance, so too those who serve God, if they fear through a fear that hangs over them, will not be negligent in the service they have undertaken. And so that this fear of the faithful should not be thought a tyrannical terror, to what he had said, "Serve in fear," he added "and rejoice," so that the exultation of joy might temper the fear of service, since fear itself would bring a cause of gladness through the consciousness of faithful service. Further, so that the freedom of joy might not go beyond the bounds of fitting moderation, he added "rejoice with trembling," because gladness free of trembling would be dangerous, leading to forgetfulness of fear. And so the reasoning of the prophetic utterance is preserved: fear holds service in check, exultation moderates fear, and the trembling that follows restrains exultation.
2.46CSEL 22:72–73
Huius autem seruitii et timorem exultantem et exultationem trementem docuit in eo, quod sequitur, consistere, dicens: adprehendite disciplinam. uirtute uerbi significationem inpatientis et uelut prseproperse ad id uoluntatis ostendit, non tam expetendam, quam adprehendendam potius disciplinam docens: non tepore fidei in huius ob“dientise obseruatione contentus, sed ardorem spiritus in adprehendendi auiditate desiderans. sic in rapiendo regno caelorum raptores dominum delectant, cum ait: a diebus autem Iohannis regnum caelorum uim patitur, et uim facientes diripiunt illud; quia, cum regni caelestis possessio Israheli praedicaretur, fides tamen gentium possessionem hanc sibi Israhel diffidente praeriperet.
He taught that the exultant fear and trembling exultation of this service consist in what follows, saying: "Lay hold of discipline." By the force of the word he shows the meaning of a will impatient and, as it were, overhasty toward it, teaching that discipline is not so much to be sought as to be seized: not content with a lukewarm faith in observing this obedience, but desiring the ardour of the spirit in eagerness to seize it. So those who seize the kingdom of heaven delight the Lord, when he says: "From the days of John the kingdom of heaven suffers violence, and the violent take it by force"; because, although the possession of the heavenly kingdom was proclaimed to Israel, the faith of the Gentiles seized this possession for itself first, while Israel distrusted.
2.47CSEL 22:73
Sic et Paulus currit, ut adprehendat, dicens: sequor autem ut adprehendam, in quo et adprehensus sum. non lento gradu properat neque otioso sequitur procursu; adprehensurus enim sequitur. et satis quidem dixisse uideretur, si consecuturus sequeretur, sed uim et ipse adferre optat et adprehendere properat et modo exempli corporalis inuadere. scit autem se eo ipso iam esse, quod adprehendere properat, adprehensum. si enim nos per corporalem naturam deus naturae suse dissidentes homo genitus adprehendit, factus ipse quod sumus, nostrum est, ad adprehendendum nunc id, quod est ipse, contendere, ut in eam gloriam, in quam naturam corporeae huius corruptionis exemit, festinatio nostra se misceat: atque ita adprehendemus id, in quo fuimus adprehensi, si naturam dei consequamur, deo ante naturam hominum consequente. adprehendenda itaque disciplina et inuadenda est quodam amplexu et in uinculo corporali, ne elabatur aut decidat.
So Paul too runs in order to lay hold, saying: "But I follow, that I may lay hold of that for which I also have been laid hold of." He does not hurry with slow step or follow with an idle course, for he follows in order to lay hold. It would seem enough to have said that he follows in order to attain, but he himself wishes to bring force, hurries to lay hold, and, in the manner of a bodily example, to seize. And he knows that he has already been laid hold of in that very thing which he hurries to lay hold of. For if God, born as man, laid hold of us, who differ from his nature, through bodily nature, becoming himself what we are, it is ours now to strive to lay hold of what he is, so that our haste may join itself to that glory into which he raised nature out of this bodily corruption; and so we shall lay hold of that in which we were laid hold of, if we attain the nature of God, God having first attained the nature of men. Discipline, then, is to be laid hold of and seized with a kind of embrace and a bodily grip, lest it slip away or fall.
2.48CSEL 22:73–74
Causam autem diligentis huius amplexus ac uinculi propheta subiecit dicens: adprehendite disciplinam, ne quando irascatur dominus, et pereatis de uia iusta, cum exarserit in breui ira eius. adest enimp“nae dies, qui in exardescente ira domini significari intellegitur: in quo si non adprehensam a nobis disciplinam tenebimus, perditi a iusta uia erimus. unicuique enim rei perit, quid quid aufertur; et quod deest, ei, cui deest, iam uidetur amissum. nam tametsi per naturam suam manet, ei tamen, cui abest, non manet. et idcirco de uia iusta impii pereunt, quia in ea non erunt. pereunt autem de uia iusta, cum exarserit in breui ira eius.
The prophet added the reason for this careful embrace and grip, saying: "Lay hold of discipline, lest at any time the Lord be angry and you perish from the just way, when his anger is kindled in a short time." For the day of punishment is at hand, which is understood to be signified by the Lord's anger being kindled; in it, if we do not hold the discipline we have laid hold of, we shall be lost from the just way. For whatever is taken away from a thing perishes for it, and what is lacking seems already lost to the one who lacks it. For though it remains in its own nature, it does not remain for the one from whom it is absent. And therefore the ungodly perish from the just way, because they will not be in it. And they perish from the just way when his anger is kindled in a short time.
2.49CSEL 22:74
Non morosa haec ira est, per quam a iusta uia pereunt, ne quis sibi interim p“nse lucro inter moras iudicii blandiatur. in breui namque exardescit ira. excipit enim nos statim ultor infernus: et decidentes de corpore, si ita uixerimus, confestim uiae rectae perimus. testes nobis sunt euangelicus diues et pauper: quorum unum angeli in sedibus beatorum et in Abrahae sinibus locauerunt, alium statim poena? regio suscepit. adeo autem statim poena mortuum excepit ut etiam fratres eius adhuc in supernis manerent. nihil illic dilationis aut morae est. iudicii enim dies uel beatitudinis retributio est aeterna uel poenae. tempus uero mortis habet interim unumquemque suis legibus, dum ad iudicium unumquemque aut Abraham reseruat, aut poena.
This anger by which they perish from the just way is not slow, lest anyone flatter himself meanwhile with the gain of punishment delayed while judgment waits. For the anger is kindled in a short time. The avenging underworld receives us at once; and falling from the body, if we have so lived, we perish at once from the right way. Witnesses to us are the rich man and the poor man of the Gospel: angels placed the one in the seats of the blessed and in Abraham's bosom, while the region of punishment at once received the other. Punishment received the dead man so immediately that his brothers were still remaining above. There is no delay or postponement there. For the day of judgment is the eternal recompense either of blessedness or of punishment; but the time of death meanwhile holds each person under its own laws, while either Abraham or punishment reserves each for judgment.
2.50CSEL 22:74–75
Et idcirco copiosum hunc sacramentis caelestibus psalmum sic propheta conclusit: beati omnes, qui confidunt in eum. non trepidam spem neque ambiguam perfectio beatitudinis exigit. confidentia ad id opus est, firmae scilicet opinionis, et indemutabili uoluntate: quia plus sit confidere, quam sperare. confidendum ergo est, ne nos a uia recta exardescens breui dei ira deperdat. fidelis enim est, qui ait: qui credit in me non iudicabitur, sed transiet de morte ad uitam, dominus noster Iesus Christus, qui est benedictus in saecula saeculorum. amen.
And therefore the prophet concluded this psalm, so rich in heavenly mysteries, thus: "Blessed are all who trust in him." The perfection of blessedness does not require a fearful or doubtful hope. Trust is needed for it, that is, a firm conviction and an unchangeable will, because to trust is more than to hope. We must trust, then, lest the anger of God, kindled in a short time, destroy us from the right way. For he is faithful who said: "He who believes in me will not be judged, but will pass from death to life," our Lord Jesus Christ, who is blessed for ever and ever. Amen.
Tractates 9
9.1CSEL 22:75
Quorundam psalmorum absoluta intellegentia est, quorundam obscurior sensus est; diuersitatem utramque adfert diuersitas prophetiae. per multa namque et uaria genera sermonis ad agnitionem dei hominem spiritus sanctus instituit. nunc sacramentorum occulta per naturas et conparationes hominum conprehendens, nunc fidei simplicitatem uerborum absolutione conmendans, nunc uitae ordinem praeceptorum ueritate confirmans, nunc quid prouidendum sit et cauendum per personam prophetae, qui psalmum scribat, ostendens: ut per hanc multiplicem et diuitem copiam doctrinae, per quasdam partes et incrementa discendi totius Intellegentise sedificatio conparetur. et erit nobis psalmus positus in exemplum, cuius superscriptio talis est: in finem pro occulta filii, psalmus Dauid. itaque per naturam eorum, quae et occulta et in fine sunt, quaerenda est psalmi intellegentia.
The understanding of some psalms is plain, of others the sense is more obscure; the diversity of prophecy brings both kinds of diversity. For the Holy Spirit has instructed man in the knowledge of God through many and varied kinds of speech: now grasping the hidden things of the mysteries through natures and comparisons of human things, now commending the simplicity of faith by plainness of words, now confirming the order of life by the truth of commandments, now showing through the person of the prophet who writes the psalm what is to be foreseen and guarded against; so that through this manifold and rich abundance of teaching, by certain parts and increments of learning, the building up of the whole understanding may be achieved. And the psalm set before us as an example will be the one whose heading is this: "For the end, for the hidden things of the son, a psalm of David." So the understanding of the psalm is to be sought through the nature of the things that are both hidden and at the end.
9.2CSEL 22:75–76
Psalmus inscriptus non est in finem pro occulta filii, nisi tantum in id, ut, ex quibus psalmus ipse consisteret, nosceretur. omnia autem, quae ad titulum sermonis adduntur, ex quibus sermo sit initus, testantur. non enim conuenit, ut in sermone aliud sit, aliud in titulo, quia titulus uelut index eorum est, de quibus scribitur. uerbi igitur eius, quod in fine dicitur, ratio est intellegenda. in fine est, ultra quod nihil est, in fine est, quod praesens tempus excedit; quia finis ex omnibus, non ex fine omnia: desinunt enim in ea cuncta, et est quoddam rei actae dictaeue postremum; et nisi in ea totius uniuersitatis postremitas erit, non erit finis; quia necesse est non esse ultimum, quod ultra se habeat aliquid postremum. ex quo intellegendum, quotiensque titulus habet in fine, non praesentia in his, sed ultima contineri. occulta autem sunt. quae abscondita et latentia sunt, quaeque reconditis et inaccessibilibus et inperspicabilibus occulantur sintque ei tantum, qui condiderit, conperta, aut nisi cum aliquibus cognoscenda protulerit. ergo psalmus inscribitur in finem pro occultis. et quia ex natura rerum, quid Intellegentise) in nominibus finis occultorumque sit, uidemus, res ipsas, quae in fine atque occultis sint, conuenit explicari.
The psalm was inscribed "for the end, for the hidden things of the son" only so that what the psalm consists of might be known. For everything added to the title of a discourse bears witness to the things from which the discourse began. It is not fitting that one thing should be in the discourse and another in the title, since the title is, as it were, an index of what is written about. The meaning of the word "for the end," then, must be understood. That is at the end beyond which there is nothing; that is at the end which goes beyond the present time; for the end comes from all things, not all things from the end, since all things cease in it, and it is a kind of last point of something done or said; and unless the last point of the whole universe is in it, it will not be the end, because what has something last beyond itself cannot be the last. From this it is to be understood that whenever the title has "for the end," not present things but the last things are contained in it. Hidden things are those that are concealed and lie unseen, and are hidden in secret, inaccessible, and impenetrable places, and are known only to him who stored them away, or only when he has brought them forward to be known by some.
9.3CSEL 22:76–77
Et de his quidem testis est nobis beatus apostolus Paulus ita dicens: prout legentes potestis intellegere intellectum meum in sacramento Christi, quod aliis temporibus non est cognitum filiis hominum, sicut nunc reuelatum est. et rursum: mihi minimo omnium sanctorum haec gratia data est in gentibus, euangelizare inuestigabiles diuitias Christi et inluminare, quae sit distributio sacramenti eius, quod abs conditum est a sseculis in deo. hoc est igitur occultum, de quo et dominus ait: non est absconsum, quod non cognoscatur. neque opertum. quod non reuelabitur. sed psalmus occulta continet, non occultum. recte ita: nam consequentia docent plura fuisse, non unum. est enim occultum, deum salutis humanae causa non in caelesti gloria et claritate nominis sui adfuisse, sed formam humani corporis induisse. est et occultum, naturam in eo carnis humanae non ex communi originis genere induisse, sed extitisse ex uirgine et editam uirgine fuisse et absque nascendi initio procreatam. est occultum, eum, qui mortuus sit, ex morte uixisse, gloriam inmortalitatis ex corpore resumentem. sed non is quidem finis est.
The blessed apostle Paul is our witness concerning these, saying: "So that by reading you can understand my insight into the mystery of Christ, which in other times was not made known to the sons of men as it has now been revealed." And again: "To me, the least of all the saints, this grace was given, to preach among the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ and to bring to light what is the dispensation of his mystery, hidden for ages in God." This, then, is the hidden thing of which the Lord also says: "There is nothing hidden that will not be known, nor covered that will not be revealed." But the psalm contains hidden things, not one hidden thing. Rightly so, for what follows teaches that there were several, not one. For it is a hidden thing that God, for the sake of human salvation, was present not in the heavenly glory and brightness of his name but put on the form of a human body. It is also a hidden thing that the nature of human flesh in him was not put on from the common kind of origin but came forth from a virgin, was brought forth by a virgin, and was begotten without the beginning of ordinary birth. It is a hidden thing that he who died came to life from death, taking up again from the body the glory of immortality. But this is not yet the end.
9.4CSEL 22:77–78
Finem autem non uelut quendam rerum occasum, sed decurrentium modum consummationemque significat; neque ut in abolitionem desinatur, sed ut in quendam manendi terminum ea. de quibus agitur, collocentur. quis ergo hic finis sit, id est quse rerum omnium absoluta perfectio et quae absconsa sit, beatus apostolus ad Corinthios ita loquitur: quomodo enim in Adam omnes moriuntur, sic et in Christo omnes uiuificantur. unusquisque autem suo ordine: primitse Christus, deinde qui sunt Christi, qui in aduentu eius crediderunt; deinde finis, cum tradiderit regnum deo patri, cum euacuauerit omnem principatum et potestatem. oportet enim illum regnare, donec ponat omnes inimicos sub pedibus suis: deus enim omnia subiecit sub pedibus eius. nouissima inimica deuicta est in eo mors. cum uero dixerit: omnia subiecta sunt, absque eo, qui subiecit illi omnia, tunc ipse subiectus erit illi, qui sibi subiecit omnia ut sit deus omnia in omnibus. hic igitur est finis occultis, mortuorum resurrectio, sanctorum clarificatio, malitise dominantis abolitio, mortis interitus; et per hoc Christi regnum patris quoque dei regnum: his enim gestis postquam filio erunt a patre uniuersa subiecta, non ut per subiectionem regni adimatur aeternitas, sed ut nos clarificatos et inmortalitate coopertos et in corporis sui gloriam conformatos in regnum patris inducat, iam cohereditate sua dignos, iam in familiam patris adsumptos, iam bonorum eius gloriaeque participes, ut patri conregnet in nobis sitque deus omnia in omnibus, cum subiectione oboedientise in diuinam naturam humanae adsumptionis absorbeatur infirmitas. aeterna haec igitur per filium laus patri deo debita est, suscitatis omnibus, qui ab Adam usque ad regni tempus per fidem uixerint, et caelesti habitu a corpore transfiguratis, et iniquitate malitise omnis ablata, et diabolo in poenam aeterni ignis addicto, et de memoria hominum nomine eius exempto: haec in psalmo occulta cantantur, hsec consummato fine celebrantur. et quia filius futurorum omnium conscius est, haec tamquam iam perfecta laudantur, quia in eo et apud eum et per eum omnia sunt: ipsi gloria in saecula saeculorum. amen.
"The end" signifies not a kind of setting of things but the measure and completion of things running their course; not that they should cease into abolition, but that the things in question should be placed in a kind of abiding limit. What this end is, then, that is, what the complete perfection of all things is and what is hidden, the blessed apostle tells the Corinthians thus: "For as in Adam all die, so also in Christ all are made alive. But each in his own order: Christ the firstfruits, then those who are Christ's, who believed at his coming; then the end, when he hands over the kingdom to God the Father, when he has destroyed every rule and authority. For he must reign until he puts all enemies under his feet; for God has subjected all things under his feet. The last enemy overcome in him is death. But when he has said, All things are subjected, except him who subjected all things to him, then he himself will be subjected to him who subjected all things to himself, that God may be all in all." This, then, is the end of the hidden things: the resurrection of the dead, the glorification of the saints, the abolition of ruling wickedness, the destruction of death; and through this the kingdom of Christ is also the kingdom of God the Father. For when these things have been done, after all things have been subjected to the Son by the Father, not so that eternity is taken from his kingdom by subjection, but so that he may lead us, glorified, clothed with immortality, and conformed to the glory of his body, into the kingdom of the Father, now worthy of co-inheritance with him, now taken into the Father's family, now sharers in his goods and glory, so that he may reign with the Father in us and God may be all in all, when the weakness of the human nature he assumed is swallowed up by the subjection of obedience into the divine nature. This eternal praise, then, is due through the Son to God the Father, when all who have lived by faith from Adam to the time of the kingdom have been raised and transfigured from the body into a heavenly state, when all the iniquity of wickedness has been taken away, the devil consigned to the punishment of eternal fire, and his name removed from human memory. These hidden things are sung in the psalm, these are celebrated when the end is complete. And because the Son is aware of all things to come, these are praised as already accomplished, because in him and with him and through him are all things: to him be glory for ever and ever. Amen.
Tractates 13
13.1CSEL 22:78–79
In multis nos erudiens apostolus etiam id edocet, cum omni reuerentia uerbum dei esse tractandum, dicens: qui loquitur, tamquam eloquia dei. non enim secundum sermonis nostri usum promiscuam in his esse oportet facilitatem; sed loquentibus nobis ea, quae didicimus et legimus, per sollicitudinem sermocinandi honor est reddendus auctori. et exemplum nobis caelestis doctrinae praestat humani officii consuetudo. si enim quia uerba regis interpretans et praecepta eius in aures populi deducens curat diligenter et caute per officii reuerentiam regis satisfacere dignitati, ut cum honore ac religione omnia et relegantur et audiantur: quanto magis conuenit dei eloquia ad cognitionem humanam retractantes dignos nos hoc officio praestare? sumus enim quoddam sancti spiritus organum, per quod uocis uarietas et doctrinae diuersitas audienda est. uigilandum ergo et curandum est, ut nihil humile dicamus metuentes huius sententiae legem: maledictus omnis faciens opera dei neglegenter; proposito contra praemio curse et diligentiae eorum, qui cum reuerentia ac metu sanctas scripturas sibi tamquam dei uerba conmendent et cum debita dignitate ea insinuent mentibus audientium, domino dicente: et super quem aspiciam, nisi super humilem et mitem et trementem uerba mea? oportet igitur et prsedicantes existimare non hominibus se loqui, et audientes scire non hominum sibi uerba proferri, sed esse dei uoces, dei constituta, dei leges, et reuerentiam maximam utrique officio conuenire. maximi enim periculi res est, de thensauris dei, de sacramentis reconditis, de testamento aeterno aliquid aut superuacuum proferre, aut neglegentem audire. consignanda sunt omnia animis, commendanda sensibus, quia nihil est uerborum dei, quod non sit inplendum; et omne, quod dictum est, habet quandam iam efficiendi necessitatem, quia dei uerba decreta sunt.
The apostle, instructing us in many things, teaches this too, that the word of God must be handled with all reverence, saying: "Whoever speaks, as the oracles of God." For in these things there must not be the careless ease of our ordinary speech; but when we speak what we have learned and read, honour must be paid to the author through care in discoursing. The custom of human service gives us an example for heavenly teaching. For if someone interpreting the words of a king and bringing his commands to the ears of the people takes care diligently and cautiously, out of reverence for his office, to do justice to the king's dignity, so that everything is read out and heard with honour and respect, how much more fitting is it that we, in setting forth the oracles of God for human understanding, show ourselves worthy of this office? For we are a kind of instrument of the Holy Spirit, through which the variety of the voice and the diversity of teaching are to be heard. We must be watchful and careful, then, to say nothing low, fearing the law of this sentence: "Cursed is everyone who does the works of God negligently"; while on the other side a reward is set for the care and diligence of those who, with reverence and fear, commit the holy Scriptures to themselves as the words of God and instil them with due dignity into the minds of hearers, as the Lord says: "And upon whom shall I look, but upon the humble and meek and the one who trembles at my words?" Preachers, then, must consider that they are not speaking to men, and hearers must know that it is not the words of men that are brought to them, but the voices of God, the ordinances of God, the laws of God, and that the greatest reverence befits both duties. For it is a matter of the greatest danger either to bring forward anything superfluous, or to hear negligently, about the treasures of God, the hidden mysteries, the eternal testament. Everything must be sealed in the mind and entrusted to the senses, because there is nothing in the words of God that is not to be fulfilled; and everything that has been said already has a kind of necessity of being accomplished, because the words of God are decrees.
13.2CSEL 22:79–80
Qui lectus est psalmus, in finem inscribitur. si omnes ita inscriberentur, nihil esset difficultatis; excluderet enim omnem generalitas quaestionem. sed cum aliam alius habeat inscriptionem, ex causis diuersis tantum necesse est diuersitates inscriptionum extitisse. duplex autem in his, qui in finem superscripti sunt, intellegentia est: aut enim ea, quae in consummatione erunt, continebunt, aut eorum, quae in toto psalmo erunt dicta, absolutionem psalmi finis inpertiet. sunt autem in psalmo omnia aspera, horrenda, pertaesa, blasphemiis plena, repleta sceleribus, querimoniis grauia. non est confessio in deum, non laetitia in gaudiis, non in choris canticum; sed accusatio in profanos, sed querella in contumaces, sed dolor in adflictos. ait enim: dixit insipiens in corde suo: non est deus. corrupti sunt et abominabiles facti sunt in uoluntatibus suis; non est, qui faciat bonum, non est usque ad unum, et reliqua. sequitur in fine: quis dabit ex Sion salutare Israhel? dum auertit dominus captiuitatem plebis suae, lsetetur Iacob, et exultet Israhel.
The psalm that has been read is inscribed "for the end." If all were inscribed so, there would be no difficulty, for generality would exclude every question. But since one has one inscription and another another, the differences of inscriptions must have arisen only from different causes. Now in those inscribed "for the end" the understanding is twofold: either they will contain the things that will be at the consummation, or the end of the psalm will give the resolution of everything said in the whole psalm. Everything in the psalm is harsh, dreadful, loathsome, full of blasphemies, filled with crimes, heavy with complaints. There is no confession to God, no gladness in joys, no song in choirs; but accusation against the profane, complaint against the obstinate, grief for the afflicted. For it says: "The fool has said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt and have become abominable in their wills; there is none who does good, not even one," and the rest. At the end it follows: "Who will give out of Sion the salvation of Israel? When the Lord turns back the captivity of his people, let Jacob rejoice and Israel be glad."
13.3CSEL 22:80–81
Ut enim qui pestilentem urbem ingressus omnes omnino inhabitantes morbo dissolutos et febribus sestuantes et diuerso aegritudinum genere confectos contemplatus sit et nullum illic medicum inueniens ingemescat et nihil auxilii, nihil remedii adesse tantis malis doleat et desseuire magis membrorum pestem cotidie sentiat sciatque medicum in longinquo positum mederi posse, si adesset, — quod solum superest — dolore desperationis exclamet, dicens: quis est qui eum praesentem efficeret et salutare eius adferret?, omnem scilicet sollicitudinem ad nota conuertens: pari modo spiritus sanctus contuens errorem generis humani, contuens mala saeculi huius ingrauescentia et morbum inmedicabili morte grassantem, ubi deus negatur a stulto, ubi abominandis uoluptatum fallaciis corrupti sint cuncti, ubi nullus bonum uolens sit, ubi eorum guttura innocentium sint sepulchra, ubi lingua usi sint in officium fraudulentise, ubi uenenum aspidum labiis eorum uerbisque suffusum sit, ubi os amaritudine et maledictione sit plenum, ubi uelox pedum eorum ad effundendum sanguinem cursus sit, et per, non agnoscentibus uiam pacis, in omnibus hsec eorum uiis infelicitas ingrauescat, ubi in deum nulla reuerentia est, ubi deuastatio plebis dei persecutoribus tamquam cibus panis sit, et innocentium mortes, damna, supplicia fiat satietas iniquorum, ubi deus non inuocatur, et trepidatur in nullis, creaturam in idolis omisso creatore reuerentibus, ubi deus in generatione iusta desperatur habitare, et consilium inopis confunditur, et spes patientise eius inluditur: his igitur ita grassantibus malis et toto orbe dominantibus conscius spiritus sanctus eius, qui solus opem ferre possit, exclamat: quis dabit ex Sion salutare Israhel? non enim Moyses dederat, non Elias, non Esaias, non prophetse; omnia legis opera aduersus tantam morborum pestem infirmabantur. opus erat medico, qui una atque eadem auxilii sui ope uniuersa curaret et tot ac uarios in toto orbe languores non arte, non opere, — quia quando opus et ars singulis adhibita profuisset? — sed uerbi potestate sanaret. hunc requirit spiritus, hunc exspectat, ad cuius aduentum febris quiesceret, csecitas desineret, paralysis non esset, mors non occuparet: hunc exspectat, hunc proclamat, hunc orat: quis dabit ex Sion salutare Israhel? sed in singulis uerbis singulae uirtutes sunt explicandae.
Suppose someone enters a plague-stricken city and sees all its inhabitants without exception wasted by disease, burning with fevers, and worn out by every kind of illness; he finds no physician there and groans, grieving that there is no help, no remedy for such evils, and feels the plague raging more each day in their limbs; and he knows that a physician far away could heal them if he were present. He cries out in the grief of despair (the only thing left): "Who is there to make him present and bring his salvation?", turning all his anxiety to the one he knows. In the same way the Holy Spirit, seeing the error of the human race, seeing the growing evils of this age and the disease spreading with incurable death, where God is denied by the fool, where all are corrupted by the abominable deceits of pleasures, where no one wills good, where their throats are graves of the innocent, where they use the tongue in the service of fraud, where the poison of asps is poured over their lips and words, where the mouth is full of bitterness and cursing, where the course of their feet is swift to shed blood, and, as they do not know the way of peace, unhappiness grows heavier in all their ways; where there is no reverence toward God, where the devastation of God's people is like a meal of bread to the persecutors, and the deaths, losses, and tortures of the innocent become the fill of the wicked; where God is not called upon, and fear exists where there is no cause, as they reverence the creature in idols and abandon the Creator; where it is despaired that God dwells in the righteous generation, and the counsel of the poor is confounded, and the hope of his patience is mocked: with these evils so rampant and ruling over the whole world, the Holy Spirit, knowing the one who alone can bring help, cries out: "Who will give out of Sion the salvation of Israel?" For Moses had not given it, nor Elijah, nor Isaiah, nor the prophets; all the works of the law were weak against so great a plague of diseases. There was need of a physician who would heal everything by one and the same power of his help, and would heal so many and varied sicknesses in the whole world not by art, not by labour (for when would labour and art applied to each individual have availed?), but by the power of his word. This one the Spirit seeks, this one he awaits, at whose coming fever would rest, blindness end, paralysis cease, and death not seize: this one he awaits, this one he calls out for, to this one he prays: "Who will give out of Sion the salvation of Israel?" But the powers in each word must be explained one by one.
13.4CSEL 22:81–82
Sion quae sit, apostolus docet, cum dicit: accedamus ad Sion montem etad sanctam ciuitatem Hierusalem; omnes enim currimus adprehendere, in quo sumus adprehensi a Christo, id est, inueniri in eius corpore, quod ex nobis ipse prsesumpsit, in quo ante constitutionem mundi a patre sumus electi, in quo reconciliati ex inimicis et adquisiti sumus ex perditis, in quo apostolus cum damno uniuersorum optat inueniri dicens: et omnia arbitror stercora. ut Christum lucrifaciam et inueniar in illo. ergo, quia non nisi ex adsumptione carnis nostrse hi morbi essent nostri corporis auferendi, et ex adsumptione carnis salus nostra omms in deo est, idcirco ita ait: quis dabit ex Sion salutare Israel?
What Sion is, the apostle teaches when he says: "Let us draw near to Mount Sion and to the holy city Jerusalem"; for we all run to lay hold of that for which we were laid hold of by Christ, that is, to be found in his body, which he took beforehand from us, in which we were chosen by the Father before the foundation of the world, in which we were reconciled from being enemies and acquired from being lost, in which the apostle, at the loss of all things, wishes to be found, saying: "And I count all things as dung, that I may gain Christ and be found in him." Since, then, these diseases of our body could be taken away only by his assuming our flesh, and all our salvation in God comes from the assumption of the flesh, therefore he says: "Who will give out of Sion the salvation of Israel?"
13.5CSEL 22:82–83
Sed in eo, quod salutare est, uirtus est nominis. non nos aptamus aut fingimus, sed in ueteris Testamenti libris salutare dominum deum nostrum nuncupari docemur, et proprie hoc nomen per pollicitationem gentibus semper indultum est. ait enim Esaias: et reuelauit dominus brachium suum sanctum in conspectu omnium gentium, et cognoscent omnes fines terrse salutare dei nostri. omnibus igitur gentibus reuelatum est et ab omnibus cognitum est. et rursum in psalmis spiritus sanctus exclamat: cantate domino canticum nouum, quia mirabilia fecit. ostendit dominus salutare suum, in conspectu gentium reuelauit iustitiam suam. et rursum: adnuntiate in gentibus gloriam eius et in omnibus populis salutare eius. et rursum: ostende nobis, domine, misericordiam tuam et salutare tuum da nobis. cuius spei desiderium dominus in euangelio ostendit, dicens: multi prophetse et iusti concupierunt uidere, quae uos uidetis, et audire, quse auditis. hoc salutare Simeon et exspectauit diu et, cum in manibus accepisset, agnouit et inter uagitus infantiae, inter cunarum sordes per fidem deum uidit. in talibus et agnoscens adorauit, dicens: nunc dimitte seruum tuum, domine, secundum uerbum tuum in pace: quia uiderunt oculi mei salutare tuum, quod praeparasti in conspectu uniuersorum populorum, lumen in reuelationem gentium. ergo hoc salutare gentium adnuntiatur, non carnali Israhel, qui in monte dominum maiestatis expectauit, uidit, audiuit, qui in prophetis lapidauit, cecidit, secuit et occidit; sed sermo iste omnis ad gentes est, et gentium salutaris est.
But in "salvation" there is the power of the name. We do not adapt or invent it, but we are taught in the books of the Old Testament that our Lord God is called Salvation, and this name has always been granted properly to the Gentiles by promise. For Isaiah says: "And the Lord has revealed his holy arm in the sight of all the nations, and all the ends of the earth shall know the salvation of our God." It has been revealed, then, to all nations and known by all. And again in the psalms the Holy Spirit cries out: "Sing to the Lord a new song, for he has done wonderful things. The Lord has shown his salvation; in the sight of the nations he has revealed his righteousness." And again: "Proclaim his glory among the nations, and his salvation among all peoples." And again: "Show us, Lord, your mercy, and give us your salvation." The Lord shows the longing for this hope in the Gospel, saying: "Many prophets and righteous men desired to see what you see, and to hear what you hear." Simeon long awaited this salvation, and when he had received it in his hands he recognized it, and amid the cries of infancy and the squalor of the cradle he saw God by faith. Recognizing him in such things, he worshipped, saying: "Now let your servant depart, Lord, according to your word, in peace; for my eyes have seen your salvation, which you have prepared in the sight of all peoples, a light for revelation to the Gentiles." This salvation, then, is announced to the Gentiles, not to carnal Israel, which awaited, saw, and heard the Lord of majesty on the mountain, and which in the prophets stoned, beat, sawed, and killed him; but this whole word is to the Gentiles and is the salvation of the Gentiles.
13.6CSEL 22:83–84
Ita ait: dum auertit dominus captiuitatem plebis suae. captiuitas proprie gentium est, qui in corde suo dixerant: non est deus; qui trepidauerant, ubi non erat timor, qui spem inopis confuderant et inluserant, quia dominus spes eius est, qui in generatione iusta dominum habitaturum negauerant capti religionibus daemonum, superstitionibus temporum. officiis creaturae. haec captiuitas apellitur, hoc seruitium adimitur. sed Israhel erit ille, qui credit, Israhel erit ille, qui deum oculis cordis aspiciet: quia Israhel deum uidens est, qui post captiuitatem auersam hoc dei salutare cognoscit. lsetatur Iacob, laetatur et Israhel captiuitate auersa, libertate concessa, deo contemplato, Abraham et Iacob patribus per adoptionem familiae nuncupatis. in his ergo laetemur et in his exultemus, scientes per nostram redemptionem ob unius psenitentis salutem esse in caelis gaudia angelorum: et cum caelestis laetitia pro nobis sit, oportet in Christo gaudia nostra esse perpetua, qui est benedictus in saecula saeculorum. amen.
So it says: "When the Lord turns back the captivity of his people." The captivity belongs properly to the Gentiles, who had said in their heart, "There is no God"; who had trembled where there was no fear; who had confounded and mocked the hope of the poor, because the Lord is his hope; who had denied that the Lord would dwell in the righteous generation, being captive to the worship of demons, the superstitions of times, and the service of the creature. This captivity is driven out, this slavery taken away. But Israel will be the one who believes, Israel will be the one who looks upon God with the eyes of the heart; for Israel is "one who sees God," who, after the captivity is turned back, recognizes this salvation of God. Jacob rejoices, Israel too rejoices, when captivity is turned back, freedom granted, God beheld, and Abraham and Jacob named fathers by adoption into the family. In these things, then, let us rejoice and exult, knowing that, through our redemption, there is joy among the angels in heaven over the salvation of one who repents; and since there is heavenly gladness for us, our joys must be perpetual in Christ, who is blessed for ever and ever. Amen.
Tractates 14
14.1CSEL 22:84
Psalmus, qui lectus est, inscribitur psalmus Dauid, quia per eum spiritus sanctus haec locutus est. et recte ita conpetit psalmo; nihil enim in tempus alterum destinatur. nihil ex occultis profertur, sed omne opus eius in praesens est: denique ita incipit: domine, quis habitabit in tabernaculo tuo aut quis requiescet in monte sancto tuo? oratio est simplex dominum precantis et optantis ab eo noscere, qui mores, quod studium, quse uoluntas sit cohabitaturi cum deo et in excelsis eius et caelestibus quieturi. non est enim humilis cuiusdam animi nec mediocris operis admisceri deo, mereri eiusdem domicilii conmunionem. ergo de quibus quaeritur, statim respondetur: ut, quia arduum est atque difficile haec obtinere. quibus modis id consequendum sit, intellegatur.
The psalm that has been read is entitled "A psalm of David," because the Holy Spirit spoke these things through him. And this rightly suits the psalm, for nothing in it is directed to another time, nothing is brought out of hidden things, but its whole work concerns the present. So it begins: "Lord, who will dwell in your tabernacle, or who will rest on your holy mountain?" It is the simple prayer of one who entreats the Lord and wishes to learn from him what the character, the pursuit, and the will are of one who is to dwell with God and rest in his high and heavenly places. For it belongs to no low mind or ordinary effort to be joined with God and to merit fellowship in his dwelling. So the question asked is answered at once, so that, since it is hard and difficult to obtain these things, it may be understood by what means it is to be attained.
14.2CSEL 22:84–85
Dicit enim ad id, quod qusesitum est: qui ingreditur sine macula et operatur iustitiam, et cetera psalmi consequentia. talibus praeceptis formatur, talibus monitis instruitur, cui ad deum iter est, cui ad sublimitatem eius ascensus est, cui in aeternis eius est requies. praeceptum autem omne breuitate collectum est, ut memoriae mandetur, ut haereat animo, ut foris ac domi, publice priuatimque, die ac nocte retineatur, ut temperetur, instetur. est enim haec breuitas locuples et infinita et ex omnibus noui ac ueteris Testamenti prseceptis institutisque decerpta, infantibus, feminis, uiris, senibus aptissima. atque ut breuitatis ipsius conmendabilior esse possit opulentia, quid in singulis uerbis sacramenti sit, prosequemur. non est hic prophetia, non obscuritas, non exemplum. uox interrogantis est, bonitas respondentis, confirmatio audientis. sed in his uirtus est contuenda uerborum. distinxit enim ita: habitationem in tabernaculo, requiem in monte; et prior est habitatio in tabernaculo, posterior requies in monte. ut ergo habitationis et requiei distantia intellegatur, montis et tabernaculi proprietas explicanda est.
For to what was asked he says: "He who enters without stain and works righteousness," and the rest that follows in the psalm. By such precepts is he formed, by such admonitions instructed, whose journey is toward God, whose ascent is to his height, whose rest is in his eternal things. Every precept has been gathered in brevity, so that it may be committed to memory, cling to the mind, and be kept abroad and at home, in public and private, by day and by night, so that it may be tempered and insisted upon. For this brevity is rich and boundless, gathered from all the precepts and ordinances of the New and Old Testaments, most suitable for children, women, men, and the old. And so that the wealth of this brevity may be the more commended, we shall go through what mystery there is in each word. There is no prophecy here, no obscurity, no figure. There is the voice of one who asks, the goodness of one who answers, the confirmation of one who hears. But in these the force of the words must be considered. For he distinguished thus: dwelling in the tabernacle, rest on the mountain; and dwelling in the tabernacle comes first, rest on the mountain later. So that the difference between dwelling and rest may be understood, the proper sense of mountain and tabernacle must be explained.
14.3CSEL 22:85–86
Et tabernacula, quse prius fuisse legimus, fuerunt leuia, caduca, arescentia, ad tempus ex frondibus texta, qualia interdum a nobis effici solent uitandi aestus causa, ut infra umbram eorum ardorem solis aestumque uitemus. istius modi enim tabernacula populo sunt per Moysen instituta. sed haec arefacta sunt et dissoluta. erant enim imaginaria et facta ad exemplum. ait enim ita deus Moysi: uide facias omnia secundum speciem, quam ostendi tibi in monte. Dauid quoque. templum aedificare optans, tabernaculum cognominauit, sicuti ait: non dabo somnum oculis meis, donec inueniam locum domino, tabernaculum deo Iacob. sed et Moysi et Salomonis tabernaculum concidit; et deinceps apostoli plurima tabernacula condiderunt et per omnes orbis terrarum partes, quacumque adiri potest, quin etiam ex Oceani insulis habitationes deo plurimas parauerunt. de quorum gloria testatur spiritus sanctus: quam amabilia sunt tabernacula tua, domine uirtutum! concupiscit et deficit anima mea in atriis domini. non ergo unum tabernaculum, uel per Moysen frondeum, uel per Dauid exoptatum, uel per Salomonem omnibus humanis operibus ornatum propheta desiderat, sed multa et innumerabilia: quia, etsi in orbe ecclesia una sit, tamen unaquaeque urbs ecclesiam suam obtinet; et una in omnibus est, cum tamen plures sint, quia una habetur in pluribus.
The tabernacles that we read existed earlier were light, perishable, withering, woven for a time from leaves, such as we sometimes make to avoid the heat, so that we may escape the burning and heat of the sun under their shade. Such tabernacles were instituted for the people through Moses. But these dried up and fell apart, for they were images, made after a pattern. For God says to Moses: "See that you make everything according to the form I showed you on the mountain." David too, wishing to build a temple, called it a tabernacle, as he says: "I will not give sleep to my eyes until I find a place for the Lord, a tabernacle for the God of Jacob." But both the tabernacle of Moses and that of Solomon fell; and afterwards the apostles founded very many tabernacles, and in all parts of the world, wherever it can be reached, even from the islands of the Ocean, they have prepared very many dwellings for God. The Holy Spirit testifies to their glory: "How lovely are your tabernacles, Lord of hosts! My soul longs and faints for the courts of the Lord." So the prophet desires not one tabernacle, whether the leafy one through Moses, or the one longed for by David, or the one adorned by Solomon with all human works, but many and innumerable; for although the church is one in the world, yet each city holds its own church; and it is one in all, though there are many, because one is held in many.
14.4CSEL 22:86
Primus itaque et maximus gradus est ad caelestia ascendentibus habitare in hoc tabernaculo et illic noctibus diebusque uitam seui totius agere, amotum a sseculi curis et negotia mundi huius relinquentem, sicut plures sanctorum numquam a tabernaculo recesserunt; ut de Iesu Naue scriptum est: et Iesus iuuenis non egrediebatur tabernaculum; et Anna prophetis non discedebat a templo, ieiuniis et obsecrationibus seruiens die ac nocte. post quse in monte domini quiescendum est: hinc enim proficiscentibus eo iter est, et non nisi per hanc habitationem iter ullum est. ergo quaerendum prius de habitatione tabernaculi fuit; quia ex eo in montem esset ascensus, deinde habitatio est temporis et laboris. quies uero non interpellatur extrinsecus, sed otium est iuge, perpetuum, molestia carens, quod in statu suo maneat; ceterum si inquietudo se misceat, otii et naturam et nomen amisit.
The first and greatest step, then, for those ascending to heavenly things is to dwell in this tabernacle and there spend night and day the life of their whole age, removed from the cares of the world and leaving the business of this world behind, as many of the saints never left the tabernacle; as it is written of Joshua son of Nun: "And the young man Joshua did not go out of the tabernacle"; and Anna the prophetess did not depart from the temple, serving with fasting and prayers night and day. After this, rest is to be had on the Lord's mountain; for the way there is for those who set out from here, and there is no way except through this dwelling. So the question about dwelling in the tabernacle had to come first, because from it is the ascent to the mountain; and dwelling, moreover, belongs to time and labour. But rest is not interrupted from outside; it is leisure that is continual, perpetual, free of trouble, remaining in its own state; if disquiet mixes with it, it loses both the nature and the name of leisure.
14.5CSEL 22:86–88
Sed mons domini nullus in terra est: omnis enim terra iam pridem per uitia hominum maledictis obnoxia est; nam et in Adae operibus et in Abel sanguine meruit offensam et. sub Noe habitantium peccatis fuit plena et nunc quoque edita et excelsa quaeque montium fanis, templis sacrisque maculantur. ergo non in his talibus expectandus hic mons est. sed ut editissimse humi partes montes nuncupantur, ita necesse est in his, quae caelestia sunt,. maxima atque sublimia sub montis nomine opinari. et quid sublimius Christo? quid excelsius deo nostro? mons autem eius est illud, quod ex homine corpus adsumpsit, in quo nunc habitat et sublimis et excelsus super omnem principatum et potestatem et omne nomen. super hunc montem sedificata est ciuitas, quse non possit abscondi, quia, sicut ait apostolus, non est aliud fundamentum nisi Christus. ergo quia, qui Christi sunt, in Christi corpore ante constitutionem mundi electi sunt, et ecclesia corpus est Christi, et fundamentum aedificationis nostrae Christus est, et ciuitas super montem sedificata: hic ille mons est, in quo quaeritur, quis possit esse requiescens. in alio quidem psalmo de hoc eodem monte sic legimus: quis ascendit in montem domini, aut quis stabit in loco sancto eius? et Esaias nobis erit testis: et erit in nouissimis diebus manifestus mons domini, et dicent: uenite, ascendamus in montem domini et in aedem dei Iacob. et rursum Paulus: uos accessistis ad Sion montem et ad ciuitatem dei uiuentis Hierusalem. si ergo requiei nostrae spes omnis in Christi est corpore et cum in monte sit quiescendum, montem non aliud possumus intellegere quam corpus, quod suscepit e nobis, ante quod deus erat et in quo deus est et per quod transfigurauit corpus humilitatis nostrae conformatum corpori gloriae suae, si tamen et nos uitia corporis nostri cruci eius confixerimus, ut in eius corpore resurgamus. ad illud enim post habitationem ecclesiae scanditur, in illo in domini sublimitate requiescitur, in illo cum angelorum choris, cum et nos simus dei ciuitas, sociabimur. quiescitur autem, quia nullus fit ex infirmitatibus dolor, nullus ex inopia metus, sed omnibus firmitate sua per uirtutem aeternitatis utentibus in his sit, extra quse' nihil indigeant, quiescendum.
But no mountain of the Lord is on earth, for the whole earth has long been liable to curses through the vices of men: it incurred offence in the works of Adam and the blood of Abel, under Noah it was full of the sins of its inhabitants, and now too all the lofty and high places of the mountains are stained with shrines, temples, and sacrifices. So this mountain is not to be looked for among such things. But as the highest parts of the ground are called mountains, so among heavenly things we must think of the greatest and loftiest under the name of mountain. And what is loftier than Christ? What higher than our God? His mountain is the body he assumed from man, in which he now dwells, lofty and high above every rule and authority and every name. On this mountain is built the city that cannot be hidden, because, as the apostle says, there is no other foundation but Christ. Since, then, those who are Christ's were chosen in Christ's body before the foundation of the world, and the church is the body of Christ, and Christ is the foundation of our building, and the city is built on the mountain, this is the mountain on which it is asked who can rest. In another psalm we read of this same mountain: "Who ascends the mountain of the Lord, or who will stand in his holy place?" And Isaiah will be our witness: "And in the last days the mountain of the Lord will be manifest, and they will say: Come, let us go up to the mountain of the Lord and to the house of the God of Jacob." And again Paul: "You have come to Mount Sion and to the city of the living God, Jerusalem." If, then, all the hope of our rest is in Christ's body, and rest is to be had on the mountain, we can understand the mountain as nothing other than the body he took from us, before which he was God and in which he is God, and through which he transfigured the body of our lowliness, conformed to the body of his glory, provided we too have nailed the vices of our body to his cross so as to rise in his body. To it one climbs after dwelling in the church; in it one rests in the height of the Lord; in it, since we too are the city of God, we shall be joined to the choirs of angels. And there is rest, because there is no pain from weakness, no fear from want, but rest is to be had in those things outside which they lack nothing, as all enjoy their own firmness through the power of eternity.
14.6CSEL 22:88
Ergo ad id, quod quaesitum est: domine, quis habitabit in tabernaculo tuo aut quis requiescet in monte sancto tuo? respondit spiritus sanctus per prophetam: qui ingreditur sine macula et iustitiam operatur. igitur inpollutus ingrediens et extra omnem peccati labem uiuens hic esse responsus est, cui post baptismi lauacrum nullae adhaeserint sordes, sed sit inmaculatus et nitidus, sitque ei non corpus stupris contaminatum, non oculi spectaculis theatralibus sordidi, non mens uino ebria, non pecuniae uita ancilla. magnum est igitur his abstinere; sed non in his statim confecti itineris est requies: c“pta. enim in his uia est, non peracta. nam sequitur: et operatur iustitiam. bonum non tam cogitandum est, quam exsequendum; et beniuolentia non ineunda est, sed explenda. iustitiam enim uelle hic erit fructus, ut fiat. et quidem in his utilis est ad dominum cursus; uerum plura sunt reliqua.
So to what was asked, "Lord, who will dwell in your tabernacle, or who will rest on your holy mountain?", the Holy Spirit answered through the prophet: "He who enters without stain and works righteousness." The answer, then, is that this is one who enters undefiled and lives free of every stain of sin, to whom no filth has clung after the washing of baptism, but who is spotless and shining: his body not polluted with debauchery, his eyes not soiled by theatrical shows, his mind not drunk with wine, his life not the handmaid of money. It is a great thing, then, to abstain from these; but in these there is not at once the rest of a completed journey, for the way has begun in them, not been finished. For there follows: "and works righteousness." The good is not so much to be thought of as to be carried out; and goodwill is not to be begun but fulfilled. For the fruit of willing righteousness here will be that it is done. And in these things the course toward the Lord is useful; but there is more remaining.
14.7CSEL 22:88–90
Restat enim: qui ingreditur sine macula et operatur iustitiam. qui loquitur ueritatem in corde suo. superiora illa, licet magna atque praeclara sint, solent tamen cum gentibus esse conmunia, ut uitium caueant, ut famam bonitatis adquirant. sed haec animalium, non spiritalium uirtus est. apostolus enim et carnalem hominem posuit et animalem et spiritalem: carnalem, beluae modo diuina et humana neglegentem, cuius uita corporis famula sit, negotiosa cibo, somno. libidine: animalis autem, qui ex iudicio sensus humani, quid decens honestumque sit, sentiat atque ab omnibus uitiis animo suo auctore se referat, suo proprio sensu utilia et honesta diiudicans. ut pecuniam spernat, ut ieiuniis parcus sit, ut ambitione careat, ut uoluptatibus resistat, ut bonitate uenerabilis sit sed praesens in his tantum et inter homines homini erit usus. de quibus ait gentium doctor: secundum doctrinas et praecepta hominum, quae sunt rationem quidem habentia sapientiae in superstitione et humilitate sensus, ad non parcendum corpori non in aliquo honore, ut ad saturitatem carnis. spiritalis autem est, cui superiora illa ad dominum studia sint, et hoc, quod agit, per scientiam dei agat, intellegens et cognoscens, quae sit uoluntas eius, arcanum secreti consilii et absconditi a temporibus sseculi per reuelationem ac donum spiritus sancti intellegens et sciens. quae ratio sit a deo carnis adsumptae, qui crucis triumphus, quse mortis potestas. quae in uirtute resurrectionis operatio. haec, ut idem apostolus docet, animalis autem homo non percipit, quae sunt spiritus dei; stultitia enim est illi, nec potest intellegere, quoniam spiritaliter interrogatur. qui autem spiritalis est, iudicat omnia, ipse autem a nemine iudicatur.
For there remains: "He who enters without stain and works righteousness, who speaks truth in his heart." The former things, though great and illustrious, are often common with the pagans, so that they avoid vice and gain a reputation for goodness. But this is the virtue of natural men, not of spiritual ones. For the apostle distinguished the carnal man, the natural man, and the spiritual man: the carnal, who like a beast neglects divine and human things, whose life is the servant of the body, busy with food, sleep, and lust; the natural, who by the judgment of human sense perceives what is fitting and honourable and draws back from all vices on his own mind's authority, judging what is useful and honourable by his own sense, so as to despise money, be sparing with fasts, be free of ambition, resist pleasures, and be venerable for goodness; but he will have use for this only in the present and as a man among men. Of these the teacher of the Gentiles says: "According to the teachings and precepts of men, which have indeed a show of wisdom in superstition and humility of mind, in not sparing the body, not in any honour, for the satisfying of the flesh." But the spiritual man is one who has those former pursuits toward the Lord, and who does what he does through the knowledge of God, understanding and knowing what his will is, understanding and knowing through the revelation and gift of the Holy Spirit the secret of the hidden counsel concealed from the times of the world: what the reason is for God's assuming flesh, what the triumph of the cross, what the power of death, what the working in the power of the resurrection. These things, as the same apostle teaches, "the natural man does not perceive, the things of the Spirit of God; for they are foolishness to him, and he cannot understand them, because they are examined spiritually. But he who is spiritual judges all things, and he himself is judged by no one."
14.8CSEL 22:90
Conscius ergo spiritus sanctus ea, quse superiora sunt in uitae innocentia et in operibus iustitise, et gentibus et haereticis esse communia. namque plures eorum et ieiuniis corpora defatigant et continentiam patrimoniorum largitione testantur et pudicitiam uirginitate consummant. sed quia abundatura haec et multa istiusmodi in ipsis essent, dominus ad discipulos sic locutus est: amen dico uobis, cum uenerit filius hominis, putatis inueniet fidem super terram? sciebat et uirginitatem et continentiam et ieiunia esse curanda, et quia hsec non proficiunt ad sanctitatem, nisi expleantur in Christo, id est cum Christi ueritate consentiant, ad id, quod superius dixerat, proheta subiecit: et loquitur ueritatem in corde suo, superiora illa inutilia demonstrans, nisi in confessionis ueritate suscepta sint. et in his quidem conscendentibus ad requiem montis domini gradus celsus est. in innocentia uidelicet et in operibus et in confessione: sed, licet prouecti per plura simus, adhuc tamen alia sunt reliqua.
The Holy Spirit, then, knew that the former things, innocence of life and works of righteousness, are common to pagans and heretics. For many of them wear out their bodies with fasts, give proof of self-restraint by distributing their inheritances, and complete their chastity with virginity. But because these things and many like them would abound among them, the Lord spoke thus to the disciples: "Truly I say to you, when the Son of Man comes, do you think he will find faith on the earth?" He knew that virginity, self-restraint, and fasting would be cultivated, and because these do not avail for holiness unless they are fulfilled in Christ, that is, unless they agree with the truth of Christ, the prophet added to what he had said above: "and speaks truth in his heart," showing those former things to be useless unless they are undertaken in the truth of confession. In these things there is a high step for those climbing to the rest of the Lord's mountain, namely in innocence, in works, and in confession; but though we have advanced through many, there are still others remaining.
14.9CSEL 22:90–91
Solent enim plures gloriosam Intellegentise uerborum speciem prseferre et uoluntatis ac iudicii decus etiam sermonum honestate mentiri, cum de deo bene sentiant et loquantur, uerbis autem ac sensui suo gestis atque operibus mentiantur. hi sunt, qui quae locuntur oderunt et his, quse prsedicant, ipsis rebus inimici sunt. ergo ad ueritatem cordis adiunxit dicens: qui non egit dolum in lingua sua: ut ueritatem, quam sentit, non fallat in uerbis, ut catholicse doctrinae professionem et ita sentiendi ac praedicandi iudicium etiam operatio consequatur, quia, secundum apostoli testimonium, ut in corde creditur. ita ore confessio fit ad salutem. ergo ut sit in dei requiem dignus ascensus, in uerborum ac linguae ueritate uiuendum est, ut per operationum fidem sensus nostri uerba non falsa sint.
For many are accustomed to display a glorious appearance of understanding in words and to feign the beauty of will and judgment even by honourable speech, thinking and speaking well of God, but belying their words and sense by their deeds and works. These are the ones who hate what they say and in their very actions are enemies of what they preach. So to truth of heart he added, saying: "who has not practised deceit with his tongue," so that he may not betray in words the truth he perceives, and so that action too may follow the profession of catholic teaching and the judgment of thinking and preaching so; because, according to the apostle's testimony, as one believes in the heart, so confession is made with the mouth unto salvation. So that the ascent to God's rest may be worthy, then, we must live in the truth of words and tongue, so that through the faithfulness of our works the words of our mind are not false.
14.10CSEL 22:91
Sed artum hoc et per saeculi nequitias uitia difficile est. est enim necessarium plerumque mendacium, et nonnumquam falsitas utilis est, cum aut percussori de latente mentimur, aut testimonium pro periclitante frustramur, aut fallimus de difficultate curationis segrotum; et oportet secundum apostoli doctrinam sermonem nostrum sale esse conditum. idcirco nunc spiritus sanctus falsitatis adfectum mendacii condicionibus temperauit dicens: qui non egit dolum in lingua sua nec fecit proximo suo malum, ut crimen mendacii in incommodo haberetur alieno.
But this is narrow and difficult amid the wickedness and vices of the world. For a lie is often necessary, and falsehood is sometimes useful: when we lie to a murderer about someone hiding, or frustrate testimony against someone in danger, or deceive the sick about the difficulty of their cure; and, according to the apostle's teaching, our speech must be seasoned with salt. Therefore the Holy Spirit now tempered the disposition to falsehood by the conditions of lying, saying: "who has not practised deceit with his tongue nor done evil to his neighbour," so that the crime of lying might be counted in harm to another.
14.11CSEL 22:91–92
Sed licet, quae superius diximus, expleantur, et ingrediatur innocens opereturque iustitiam, ueritatem corde conplectens, se ipsum in his, quae locutus fuerit, non fallens, malum proximo non inferens, perfectus tamen in his non erit. est adhuc aliquid in nobis edomandum, expuendum, perimendum: et, quid illud sit, idem, qui per superiora, confirmat propheta dicens: et obprobrium non accepit aduersus proximos suos. insolentiae scilicet et fiducise uitia depellit et commune illud superbiae malum tollit. quid enim tam inane, tam miserum quam homo homini superbiens, quam de se aliquid confidens? nonne uidemus plures, per opum insolentiam cum exprobrassent inopibus egestatem, amissis omnibus egere, et aliorum miseriam fastidientes rursum eguisse miserantum? plures etiam per praesumptionem uitae diu innocentis ad crimina deuolutos et, cum delicta aliis exprobrarent, ipsos uix ad psenitentiae ueniam pertinere? non est igitur obprobrium aduersus proximos ineundum, sed, si quid in illis incuriosum; si quid neglegens, si quid petulans, si quid incontinens deprehenditur, sine exprobrationis amaritudine blandimento emendationis est corrigendum. hoc humilitas, hoc sui per metum diffidentia, quse ualidissima fiducise custos est, curat, ne sit admonitio contumelia, ne sit emendatio obprobrium, ne sit doctrina conuicium. sic fiduciam orantis pharissei dominus in euangeliis damnauit, tum cum in medio consistens ita sermocinaretur: gratias tibi ago, domine, quod non sum, sicut ceteri homines; adulteri, auari, sicut et hic publicanus. erat autem publicanus in secreto orans: domine, miserere mihi peccatori. huic orationi eius scriptura subiecit: quia magis iustificatus egressus est publicanus quam pharisseus. misericordiam dei peccati confessione e promeruit publicanus: pharisaeus uero honorem eorum, quae de se praeferebat, per insolentiam obprobrii amisit.
But even if what we said above is fulfilled, and he enters innocent and works righteousness, embracing truth in his heart, not deceiving himself in what he says, not bringing evil on his neighbour, he will still not be perfect in these. There is still something in us to be tamed, spat out, and destroyed; and what it is, the same prophet confirms as in the earlier verses, saying: "and has not taken up a reproach against his neighbours." He drives out the vices of insolence and self-confidence and removes that common evil of pride. For what is so empty, so wretched as a man proud toward a man, as one confident in himself? Do we not see many who, in the insolence of wealth, reproached the poor with their need, then lost everything and were in need themselves, and, having scorned others' misery, needed in turn those who would pity them? Many too, through presumption on a long-innocent life, have rolled into crimes, and while reproaching others with their faults, hardly attain themselves to the pardon of repentance. A reproach must not be taken up against neighbours, then; but if anything careless, negligent, insolent, or incontinent is found in them, it must be corrected with the gentleness of amendment, without the bitterness of reproach. Humility sees to this, as does distrust of oneself through fear, which is the strongest guard against self-confidence: that admonition be not insult, amendment not reproach, teaching not abuse. So the Lord in the Gospels condemned the self-confidence of the praying Pharisee, when he stood in the middle and spoke thus: "I thank you, Lord, that I am not like other men, adulterers, greedy, like this tax collector too." But the tax collector was praying apart: "Lord, be merciful to me a sinner." To this prayer of his Scripture added: "that the tax collector went out justified rather than the Pharisee." The tax collector obtained God's mercy by confessing his sin; but the Pharisee lost the honour of what he displayed about himself through the insolence of reproach.
14.12CSEL 22:92–93
Sed forte iam dignum se quis, si hsec uniuersa adeptus sit, promissionibus dei credit: cum se post innocentiam, post bonitatem, post prudentise modum etiam humilitate moderatus sit. sed plura adhuc restant. nam ut significauit in eo mendacio esse peccatum, si alteri malum mentientis falsitas conpararet, ita nunc, ubi obprobria aduersus proximos non sumenda decernit, habendam tamen rationem ipsius humilitatis adiecit. quae autem haec ratio sit. cohaeret in uersu: et obprobrium non accepit aduersus proximos suos. ad nihilum deductus est in conspectu eius malignus. non oportet humilitatem carere constantia, et libertas dei a nobis in ea, quam omnibus debemus, seruitute retinenda est, ne ad potentium inpetus terreamur, ne ad maliuolorum arbitria cedamus. interdum enim etiam regibus iniqua poscentibus turpi adulatione famulamur et uitiis alienis conscientiae nostrae infirmitate blandimur. ergo si iam in professione iniquitatis abruperit, ut in uersu explicatur: ad nihilum deductus est in conspectu eius malignus, oportet istius modi hominem apud nos non alicuius, sed nullius esse iudicii, ut sit nobis nullus, abolitus, interemptus. spiritalia enim tractantem et caelestia contuentem decet hummanae nequitise despicere momenta et animo sublimi et excelso istiusmodi maliuolentiae hominem, tamquam nullus sit. opinari.
But perhaps someone, having attained all these, now believes himself worthy of God's promises, since after innocence, after goodness, after the measure of prudence, he has also been moderated by humility. But more still remain. For as he indicated that sin lies in a lie if the falsehood of the liar procured evil for another, so now, where he decrees that reproaches are not to be taken up against neighbours, he added that account must still be taken of humility itself. What this account is is joined in the verse: "and has not taken up a reproach against his neighbours. The wicked man is brought to nothing in his sight." Humility must not lack constancy, and the freedom of God must be kept by us in the servitude we owe to all, so that we are not terrified by the onset of the powerful nor yield to the will of the malicious. For sometimes we serve kings who demand unjust things with base flattery, and through the weakness of our conscience we flatter the vices of others. So if someone has already broken out into the open profession of iniquity, as the verse explains, "the wicked man is brought to nothing in his sight," such a man must be of no account with us, not of some account, so that he is nothing to us, abolished, done away with. For one who deals with spiritual things and contemplates heavenly ones ought to despise the weight of human wickedness and, with a lofty and high mind, regard a man of such malice as if he were nothing.
14.13CSEL 22:93–94
Sed magnitudinem fidei nostrae nimium forte erexisse propheta aduersus iniquos iudicabitur. sed spectandum est, quid sequatur: ad nihilum deductus est in conspectu eius malignus: timentes autem dominum magnificat. ergo, ut sine personse exceptione nullus nobis, qui malignus est, debet esse, ita et sine exceptione personse omnis, qui dominum timeat, honorandus est. non nos moueat innocens pauper, non ieiunans anus, non seruus fidelis, non confidens in ecclesiae habitatione peregrinus, sed omnes pari iudicio reuereamur, ut talis sit in eorum, qui timent dominum, magnificatione humilitas, qualis esse debet in nihil sestimandis maliuolis libertas.
But it may be judged that the prophet has raised the greatness of our faith too high against the wicked. But we must see what follows: "The wicked man is brought to nothing in his sight, but he honours those who fear the Lord." As, then, without respect of persons anyone who is wicked ought to be nothing to us, so without respect of persons everyone who fears the Lord is to be honoured. Let us not be moved by whether it is an innocent poor man, a fasting old woman, a faithful slave, or a stranger who trusts in the shelter of the church, but let us revere all with equal judgment, so that our humility in honouring those who fear the Lord may be such as our freedom ought to be in counting the malicious as nothing.
14.14CSEL 22:94
Et quia in regenerationis nostrae natiuitate in hsec sacramenta iuramus, renuntiantes diabolo, saeculo, peccatis, cum interrogantibus respondemus, retinendam usque in finem confessionis huius fidem statuit dicens: qui iurat proximo suo et non decipit. quamuis enim quis in mandatis dei diu manserit. tamen, si aliquando fefellerit, iam non manet, cum fefellit, et iustitia anterior iniustitiae tempore amittitur. et idcirco in euangelio: beati, qui manserint usque in finem, idcirco apud Salomonem omnis laus in exitu canitur, quia in his, quae promissa sunt deo, non est aliquando fallendum.
And since at the birth of our regeneration we swear to these mysteries, renouncing the devil, the world, and sins, when we answer those who question us, he decreed that the faith of this confession must be kept to the end, saying: "who swears to his neighbour and does not deceive." For although someone has remained long in God's commandments, yet if at some time he deceives, he no longer remains when he deceives, and former righteousness is lost in the time of unrighteousness. And therefore in the Gospel: "Blessed are those who remain to the end"; therefore in Solomon all praise is sung at the end; because in what has been promised to God there must never be deception.
14.15CSEL 22:94–95
Sed tendit usque ad consummationem perfectam admonitio caelestis. nam cui uitium omne detersit, cupiditatem quoque eius, quae nimium nos detinet, pecuniae auertit dicens: qui pecuniam suam non dedit ad usuram. fallax hoc beneficium et humanitas fraudulenta et damnosa hsec beniuolentia docetur. quid enim tam intolerabile, quam ut indigenti ita beneficium tribuas, ut magis egeat, et miseriam inopis opem laturus adcumules? si Christianus es, quid a deo praemii expectas, ipse ab hominibus non beneficia expectando, sed damna? si Christianus es, quid otiosam pecuniam tuam in reditum conponis et fratris tui inopiam, pro quo Christus mortuus est, thensaurum tuum efficis? si Christianus es, non quaero ut largiaris, saltem debitum sic reposce, ne spolies, et memento eum, a quo usuram repetis, esse inopem et pauperem, propter quem Christus inops uoluit esse et pauper. itaque siue iniuriam siue beneficium cum pauperi praestas, Christo praestare te nosce, quia propter eum, cum deus esset, indigentiam eius est dignatus et nomen.
But the heavenly admonition reaches all the way to perfect completion. For from him whom he has cleansed of every vice he also turns away the desire for money, which holds us back too much, saying: "who has not given his money at interest." This kindness is taught to be deceitful, this humanity fraudulent, this goodwill ruinous. For what is so intolerable as to give a kindness to the needy in such a way that he is in greater need, and to heap up the poor man's misery while you pretend to bring help? If you are a Christian, what reward do you expect from God, when you yourself expect from men not kindnesses but losses? If you are a Christian, why do you set your idle money to earn a return and make your brother's poverty, for whom Christ died, your treasure? If you are a Christian, I do not ask you to give; at least ask back the debt in such a way that you do not plunder, and remember that the one from whom you demand interest is needy and poor, for whose sake Christ willed to be needy and poor. So whether you do injury or kindness to the poor, know that you do it to Christ, because for their sake, though he was God, he deigned to take their need and their name.
14.16CSEL 22:95
Sed ne durus sermo admonitionis istius crederetur, tamquam si penitus sub usurarum nomine habendi curam remouisset: non igitur adquirendi sollicitudinem sustulit, quin etiam modestiam accipiendi muneris temperauit adiciens ad id, quod dixerat: qui pecuniam suam non dedit ad usuram et munera super innocentes non accepit. est quaedam munerum consuetudo, quae honorem adferat largienti, ita ut maximi doloris sit oblata contemni. quam damni donasse. quae sumpta sunt. igitur ea munera, quae in alterius operarentur iniuriam, inhibuit. nam si usum omnino munerum abstulisset, satis fuerat dixisse: et munera non accipit. sed quia simplex donorum usus aut ex hominis aut etiam ex dei reuerentia uenit, ea uetuit munera, quae integritatem iudicii corrumperent, quse innocentis iniuriam emerent, quae nullum in se caritatis mutuae officium continerent. ut enim quse deo offerimus. his quidem ille non eget. sed per nos debitae reuerentiae explentur officio, ita eam in muneribus docet seruandam esse rationem, ut ea sumantur a nobis, quae sint grata et utilia offerentibus. non quae nos faciant uenales, nec insidiosa innocentibus sint. nec munerantibus sumptuosa, officio potius quam cupiditate sumpta, honore ingesta quam metu, caritate magis suscepta quam lucro.
But so that the word of this admonition should not be thought harsh, as if under the name of interest he had removed all concern for having, he did not take away the care of acquiring; indeed, he tempered the moderation of accepting a gift, adding to what he had said: "who has not given his money at interest and has not accepted gifts against the innocent." There is a certain custom of gifts that brings honour to the giver, so that it is a very great grief to have one's offering scorned, greater than the loss of having given what was taken. So he forbade those gifts that would work injury to another. For if he had taken away the use of gifts altogether, it would have been enough to say "and does not accept gifts." But because the simple use of gifts comes from reverence either for man or for God, he forbade those gifts that would corrupt the integrity of judgment, that would buy injury to the innocent, that contain in themselves no duty of mutual love. For as with what we offer to God, he does not need it, but through us the duties of due reverence are fulfilled, so he teaches that this account must be kept in gifts: that we accept what is pleasing and useful to those who offer, not what makes us venal, nor what is treacherous to the innocent, nor costly to the givers; taken out of duty rather than greed, offered out of honour rather than fear, received out of love rather than for gain.
14.17CSEL 22:95–96
Qui facit haec, non mouebitur in aeternum. per haec igitur est habitatio in tabernaculo, per haec requies in monte. restat ergo praeceptorum custodia et mandatorum opus. condendus est psalmus in uiscera, scribendus in corde, in memoria signandus et huius nobiscum noctibus diebusque copiosae breuitatis thensaurus conparandus, ut adquisita hac in uiaticum seternitatis opulentia et habitantes in ecclesia tandem in gloria Christi corporis quiescamus.
"He who does these things will not be moved for ever." Through these, then, is dwelling in the tabernacle, through these rest on the mountain. What remains, therefore, is the keeping of the precepts and the work of the commandments. The psalm must be stored in our inmost parts, written on the heart, sealed in memory, and the treasure of this abundant brevity must be kept with us night and day, so that, having acquired this wealth as provision for eternity and dwelling in the church, we may at last rest in the glory of Christ's body.
Tractates 51
51.1CSEL 22:96
Superscriptio ipsa psalmi sollicitam expetendae Intellegentise postulat diligentiam. est enim in exordio eius statim positum: in finem intellectus. nam et non sui temporis res psalmus continere ostenditur, cui praescriptio tituli in finem est. et cum in fine intellegentia sit, non potest in eo alicuius alterius magis rei intellegentia esse quam finis. finis autem est, ut frequenter ostendimus, quo concluduntur omnia, cuius causa cetera sunt, ad quem uniuersa spei, rerum, negotiorum opera festinant.
The very heading of the psalm demands careful diligence in seeking its understanding. For at its opening is set at once: "For the end, understanding." The psalm is shown to contain things not of its own time, since the title "for the end" is set before it. And since the understanding is at the end, there can be in it the understanding of no other thing more than of the end. And the end, as we have often shown, is that in which all things are concluded, for whose sake the rest exist, to which all the works of hope, of affairs, and of business hasten.
51.2CSEL 22:96–98
Intellegentia ergo psalmi in eo consistit, ob quem omnia sunt, extra quem nihil est. et quis iste sit, superscriptio ipsa. quse continere historiam existimatur, ostendet. est enim talis: in finem intellectus illi Dauid, cum uenit Doec Idumseus et adnuntiauit Saul et dixit ei: uenit Dauid in domum Abimelech. atque ut absolutius rationem superscriptionis consequi possimus, ipse rerum gestarum ordo subdendus est. Doec prsepositus erat mulorum Saul; qui ad Saul ait: uidi filium Iesse uenientem in Noba ad Abimelech, filium Achitob. et interrogauit eum in domino et manducare dedit ei et gladium Golise alienigense dedit illi. quibus auditis rex potestatem Doec sacerdotum et ciuitatis dedit. dehinc scriptura subiecit: et circumiuit, inquit, Doec Idumseus, et tetigit sacerdotes et mortificauit in die illa octoginta et quinque, omnes ferentes ephud, et Noba ciuitatem sacerdotum deiecit in ore gladii. hsec itaque omnis gestorum fides est: ex qua tantum ad psalmi titulum praesumptum est, quantum et sacramento psalmi et propheticae satisfaceret doctrinae. id enim solum in superscriptione est: cum, inquit, uenit Doec et adnuntiauit Saul et dixit: quia uenit Dauid in domum Abimelech. et necessario post quinquagesimum psalmum, in quo peccatorum remissio secundum sanctificati huius, ut in exordio psalmorum docuimus, numeri uirtutem continetur, psalmus iste tempore anterior, ordine posterior collocatur: ut id, quod in finem intellectus prsescribitur, perfectis undique et absolutis sacramentorum generibus possit intellegi.
The understanding of the psalm, then, consists in him for whose sake all things are, outside whom there is nothing. And who he is, the heading itself, which is thought to contain history, will show. For it is this: "For the end, understanding, to that David, when Doeg the Edomite came and told Saul and said to him: David has come to the house of Abimelech." And so that we may grasp the meaning of the heading more fully, the order of the events themselves must be set out. Doeg was in charge of Saul's mules; he said to Saul: "I saw the son of Jesse coming to Nob to Abimelech, son of Ahitub; and he inquired of the Lord for him and gave him food and gave him the sword of Goliath the Philistine." When the king heard this, he gave Doeg power over the priests and the city. Then Scripture added: "And Doeg the Edomite went around and struck the priests and killed that day eighty-five, all wearing the ephod; and he overthrew Nob, the city of the priests, with the edge of the sword." This is the whole faithful record of events, from which only so much has been taken for the title of the psalm as would satisfy both the mystery of the psalm and the prophetic teaching. For the heading contains only this: "When Doeg came and told Saul and said: David has come to the house of Abimelech." And necessarily this psalm, earlier in time, is placed later in order, after the fiftieth psalm, in which the forgiveness of sins is contained according to the power of that sanctified number, as we taught at the beginning of the Psalms; so that what is headed "for the end, understanding" may be understood when the kinds of mysteries have been completed and perfected on every side.
51.3CSEL 22:98–99
Abimelech, interpretatione uerbi, fratris mei imperium significat. quod enim nobiscum fratris mei imperium dicimus, id Hebraei Abimelech nuncupant. cum ergo Sauli dicitur: uenit Dauid in domum Abimelech, illi inimico Dauid nuntiatur, quod domum ingressus sit fratris imperii. domus autem imperii fratris quae sit, Petrus apostolus docet dicens: et uos. quasi lapides uiui sedificamini domus spiritalis ad sacerdotium sanctum. et infra: uos autem genus electum. regale sacerdotium, genus sanctum, plebsad possidendum. in hanc igitur spiritalem domum sedificandi in regale genus sumus, si per spiritalem corporum aedificationem conformes deo facti genus perfici regale mereamur. hanc ergo Abimelech domum, id est domum fraterni regni, Dauid ille uerus, sanctus, rex, iustus, oriens ingressus est; factus scilicet nostri corporis homo. quse domus fraternum ei regnum est, quia in eiusdem corporis gloria coheredes sumus regni eius, ipso dicente: uenite, benedicti patris mei, possidete praeparatum uobis regnum a constitutione mundi. quod autem fratres eius sint, quorum domum regiam fuerit ingressus, per prophetam testatur in psalmo dicens: adnuntiabo nomen tuum fratribus meis, in media ecclesia laudabo te. concessa ergo secundum praecedentem psalmum peccatorum remissione uerbum caro factum habitat in nobis, qui et fratres et domus spiritalis et regale genus sumus.
Abimelech, by interpretation of the word, signifies "my brother's rule." For what we call "my brother's rule" the Hebrews call Abimelech. When, then, Saul is told, "David has come to the house of Abimelech," David's enemy is told that he has entered the house of his brother's rule. What the house of his brother's rule is, the apostle Peter teaches, saying: "And you, like living stones, are built up as a spiritual house for a holy priesthood." And below: "But you are a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy race, a people for possession." Into this spiritual house, then, we are to be built as a royal race, if through the spiritual building of our bodies, made conformed to God, we deserve to be perfected as a royal race. This house of Abimelech, then, that is, the house of the brotherly kingdom, was entered by that true David, holy, king, just, the dayspring, namely when he became man in our body. This house is a brotherly kingdom to him, because in the glory of the same body we are co-heirs of his kingdom, as he himself says: "Come, you blessed of my Father, possess the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world." That those whose royal house he entered are his brothers he testifies through the prophet in the psalm, saying: "I will declare your name to my brothers; in the midst of the church I will praise you." So, the forgiveness of sins having been granted according to the preceding psalm, the Word made flesh dwells in us, who are both brothers and a spiritual house and a royal race.
51.4CSEL 22:99
Populus autem impius et parricidalis et proditor, qui in Doec significatur, regi suo, inimico scilicet Dauid, prodit, quod in domo Abimelech sit — et hoc fit, cum Pilato traditur, cum homo crucifigendus offertur, cum repudiato rege regem suum Caesarem confitentur — prodens quidem eum in domo esse Abimelech, sed non intellegens eum, cum in domo Abimelech sit. in domo esse imperii fraterni, corpus scilicet, in quo ei sanctorum ecclesia, quae corpus est Christi, conformis conregnabit., ingressum, id est in qua et desideratum sibi cibum sumpserit - desiderio enim manducare pascham desiderauit — et ex qua Golise, id est diaboli arma sustulerit; fortis enim spolia ipse diripuit; post quod ab hoc eodem Doec, id est populo proditore apostoli occisi. ecclesiae subuersse sunt. hinc ergo titulus psalmi: in finem intellectus, quia in Christo, qui Dauid, oriens, iustus. rex et aeternus et pastor est, totius spei nostrae consummatio et legis finis esse intellegitur: qui et secundum psalmi et titulum et ordinem in ea corporis sui domo proditus est. quse ei fraterni domus esse significatur imperii.
But the ungodly, parricidal, and treacherous people, who is signified in Doeg, betrays to its king, the enemy of David, that he is in the house of Abimelech. This happens when he is handed over to Pilate, when the man is offered to be crucified, when, rejecting their king, they confess Caesar as their king. They betray him as being in the house of Abimelech, but do not understand that, in being in the house of Abimelech, he has entered the house of brotherly rule, that is, the body in which the church of the saints, which is the body of Christ, will reign with him, conformed to him; the house in which he both took the food he longed for (for he longed with desire to eat the Passover) and from which he took away the arms of Goliath, that is, of the devil, for he plundered the spoils of the strong man; after which the apostles were killed and the churches overthrown by this same Doeg, that is, the treacherous people. Hence, then, the title of the psalm, "for the end, understanding," because in Christ, who is David, the dayspring, the just one, the king, eternal and shepherd, is understood the completion of all our hope and the end of the law; who, according to both the title and the order of the psalm, was betrayed in that house of his body which is signified to be the house of brotherly rule.
51.5CSEL 22:99–100
Quid gloriaris, in malitia qui potens es, iniquitatem tota die? querella prophetae est, gloriari eum iniquitate tota die, qui in malitia potens sit. et haec quidem gloria iniquitatis arguitur. ceterum est gloria et expetenda et. confitenda et adfectu quodam exultantis gaudii eloquenda; quod utrumque sub isdem dictis alius propheta demonstrat dicens: non glorietur sapiens in sapientia sua, neque fortis in fortitudine sua, neque diues in diuitiis suis: sed qui gloriatur. in domino glorietur. uetitis enim primum inprobabilis gloriae causis causam rursum gloriae conpetentis ostendit. quo exemplo beatus apostolus scit in nullo sibi nisi in uno tantum gloriandum, cum ait: mihi autem absit gloriari, nisi in cruce domini nostri Iesu Christi, per quem mihi mundus crucifixus est et ego mundo. non ergo gloria istiusmodi, sed gloria iniquitatis offendit; et eius iniquitatis, quse die tota sit. diem pro aetate uel tempore hominis nuncupari solere meminimus, cum dicitur: diem hominis non concupiui, uel rursum cum Abraham diem domini desiderauit, uel cum apostolus santanae tradit in interitum carnis, ut spiritus saluus sit in die domini, non hunc diem ortu solis occasuque finitum, sed diem constituti temporis uel aetatis ostendens. potens ergo in malitia gloriatur iniquitatem tota die.
"Why do you boast in wickedness, you who are mighty, of iniquity all day long?" The prophet's complaint is that he who is mighty in wickedness boasts of iniquity all day long. It is this boasting in iniquity that is rebuked. For there is a glory that is to be sought and confessed and spoken with a kind of feeling of exultant joy; another prophet shows both under the same words, saying: "Let not the wise man boast in his wisdom, nor the strong man in his strength, nor the rich man in his riches; but let him who boasts boast in the Lord." Having first forbidden the causes of unworthy boasting, he shows in turn the cause of fitting boasting. By this example the blessed apostle knows that he must boast in nothing except in one thing alone, when he says: "But far be it from me to boast except in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ, through whom the world has been crucified to me and I to the world." It is not boasting of this kind that offends, then, but boasting in iniquity, and in iniquity that lasts all day. We remember that "day" is often used for the age or lifetime of a man, as when it is said, "I have not desired the day of man," or again when Abraham longed for the day of the Lord, or when the apostle hands someone over to Satan for the destruction of the flesh, that the spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord, meaning not this day bounded by the rising and setting of the sun, but the day of an appointed time or age. The mighty one in wickedness, then, boasts of iniquity all day long.
51.6CSEL 22:100–101
Sed absolute intellegitur, in Doec personam rationem querellae huius non conuenire. quid enim potentiae habebat mulorum custos et ius in animalia uectionis regiae sortitus, aut tantum nuntians Dauid domum Abimelech ingressum? numquid tota die iniquitatem gloriatur? uerum sub persona eius populus, cui omnis in iniquitate aetas fuit, cui ex potentatu malitise gloria iniquitatis ipsius abundauit, significari intellegendus est. potens enim fuit, cum seruiens uisitabatur a domino, cum propter eum tot plagis percussa Aegyptus est, cum in trium dierum tenebris tenebras ipsas lumine secum manente non sensit, cum Aegyptum ipsam argento et omni ornatu despoliatam cladi suae reliquit, cum secundum diei noctisque tempora columna nunc nubila nunc ignea usus est, cum rubrum mare pedes transiuit, cum angelorum cibo uixit, cum maiestatem descendentis ad montem dei uidit, cum uocem de igne loquentis audiuit, cum regna multa bellis grauibus euertit. cam Iordanem refluentem, ut sibi areret, spectauit, cum prophetas habuit, cum sacerdotibus ad emundationem peccatorum et redemptionem animae suae usus est, cum obtinere regnum suum meruit. sed in his omnibus cum potens esset, tamen in malitia sua potens semper fuit, cum caepas et alium Aegypti et carnes desiderauit, cum ob uitiorum consuetudinem seruitutem impiam libertati pise prsetulit, cum uitulum adorauit, Moysi maledixit, deum abominatus est, filios suos dsemonum hostias uouit, prophetas occidit, ipsum quoque deum ac dominum suum. sui causa natum hominem, proditum prsetori in crucem sustulit. ac sic toto uitae; suse die iniquitatem glorians, cum potens esset, potens tamen in malitia esse permansit.
But it is plainly understood that the reason for this complaint does not fit the person of Doeg. For what power did a keeper of mules have, one who had been given charge over the animals that carried the king, or who merely reported that David had entered Abimelech's house? Does he boast of iniquity all day long? Rather, under his person is to be understood the people whose whole age was in iniquity, for whom the glory of iniquity itself abounded from the power of wickedness. For it was mighty when, as a slave, it was visited by the Lord; when for its sake Egypt was struck with so many plagues; when in the three days' darkness it did not feel the darkness, since light remained with it; when it left Egypt itself, stripped of silver and every adornment, to its ruin; when, according to the times of day and night, it had the pillar now of cloud, now of fire; when it crossed the Red Sea on foot; when it lived on the food of angels; when it saw the majesty of God descending on the mountain; when it heard the voice of one speaking from the fire; when it overthrew many kingdoms in heavy wars; when it watched the Jordan flow back so as to become dry for it; when it had prophets; when it had priests for the cleansing of sins and the redemption of its soul; when it deserved to obtain its own kingdom. But though it was mighty in all these, it was always mighty in its wickedness: when it longed for the onions and garlic and meat of Egypt; when, from the habit of vices, it preferred ungodly slavery to godly freedom; when it worshipped the calf, cursed Moses, abhorred God, vowed its sons as sacrifices to demons, killed the prophets, and even raised on the cross its God and Lord himself, born as man for its sake and betrayed to the governor. And so, boasting of iniquity in the whole day of its life, though mighty, it remained mighty in wickedness.
51.7CSEL 22:101–102
Post hanc ergo de eo prophetici doloris querellam iam in ipsum sermo conuertitur: iniustitiam cogitauit lingua tua. linguae humanse officium est, ut naturali inpulsa ratione. motu uario eodemque moderato uocem in uerba distinguat, extetque per eam ex confuso erumpentis spiritus sono dissonans ad rerum intellegentiam sermo. et quamuis quidem hic eius ad id efficiendum rationabilis motus sit, tamen ipsa subdita potius esse rationi intellegitur, quam sensu rationis intellegens est. quod uero caret sensu Intellegentise, caret et rationis instinctu. quidquid autem caret rationis instinctu, caret et meditatione consilii. et quomodo recte a propheta dictum intellegitur, linguam iniustitiam cogitare, cum cogitatio ex rationabili sensu animae uiuentis ineatur, lingua uero non ad naturam rationis ineundae, sed ad ministerium naturae sit rationabilis instituta? sed dicti huius perfecti et prophetici auctoritatem et alius propheta demonstrat dicens: in ore stultorum cor eorum est: quia nihil ex rationis consilio tractantes et cordis meditatione pendentes temerario tantum motu linguae inconditas res fortuitas et inconditas eloquantur. atque ideo in ore stultorum cor eorum est, quia non quod cogitauerint loquentur, sed quod locuti fuerint cogitabunt. et hoc quidem de lingua stulti. at uero de lingua sapientis ita legimus: lingua intellegenis meditatur sapientiam; et rursum: lingua mea calamus scribse uelociter scribentis: quia intellegentis lingua ex meditatione sapientise sit, et eadem rursum tamquam calamus scribentis nihil inconpositum, nihil incertum agat, sed his, quae aut cogitata aut lecta fuerint, obtemperans celeriter ex ratione consilii obsecundet.
After this complaint of the prophet's grief about him, the discourse now turns to address him: "Your tongue has devised injustice." The function of the human tongue is, driven by natural reason, with a varied yet regulated motion, to divide the voice into words, so that through it speech may stand out from the confused sound of breath bursting forth and be distinct for the understanding of things. And although its motion for doing this is rational, yet it is understood to be subject to reason rather than itself understanding by the sense of reason. But what lacks the sense of understanding lacks also the impulse of reason; and whatever lacks the impulse of reason lacks also the deliberation of counsel. How, then, is it understood to be rightly said by the prophet that the tongue devises injustice, since thinking begins from the rational sense of a living soul, whereas the tongue was established not for the nature of beginning reason but for the service of a rational nature? But another prophet too shows the authority of this perfect and prophetic saying, when he says: "The heart of fools is in their mouth"; because, handling nothing by the counsel of reason and not depending on the meditation of the heart, they utter disordered, random, and disordered things by the rash motion of the tongue alone. And so the heart of fools is in their mouth, because they will not speak what they have thought, but will think what they have said. So much for the tongue of the fool. But of the tongue of the wise we read thus: "The tongue of the understanding meditates wisdom"; and again: "My tongue is the pen of a scribe writing swiftly"; because the tongue of the one who understands proceeds from the meditation of wisdom, and again, like the pen of a writer, does nothing disordered, nothing uncertain, but, obeying what has been thought or read, quickly complies by the reasoning of counsel.
51.8CSEL 22:102–103
Et quia ex ratione naturae cogitatis potius famuletur lingua quam cogitet, haec lingua, quae iniustitiam cogitauit, non naturae suae usa esse docetur officiis. sequitur enim: sicut nouacula acuta fecisti dolum. nouacula ad nitorem uultus acuitur, ut abradens hirsutam atque horrentem faciem leuificet. haec si potius uulneret, dolum fecit, quippe cum pneparata ad ornatum ministerium suum praebuerit ad uulnus. lingua haec ergo huius in malitia potentis iniquitatem cogitans dolum fecit: id est, quam natura ad eloquendas rationabiles cogitationes consulti cordis prseparauerat, ipsa potius inrationabiles cogitet iniquitates. populus enim ille, qui in Doec significari intellegendus est, ad magnificandum dei nomen electus et ad celebrandas laudes ipsius praeparatus hunc inhonorat, hunc tradit, hunc, quantum in se est, morte crucis perimit; et hoc linguse suae nouacula, per quam clamauit: crucifige, crucifige, consummat. dolum itaque, tamquam nouacula acuta, iniquitatem cogitans fecit haec lingua; et cuiusmodi dolum, consequentia docent.
And since, by the reason of nature, the tongue serves thoughts rather than thinks, this tongue that devised injustice is shown not to have used the functions of its nature. For there follows: "Like a sharp razor you have worked deceit." A razor is sharpened for the neatness of the face, so that by shaving off the rough and bristly face it may make it smooth. If instead it wounds, it has worked deceit, since, prepared for adornment, it has given its service to a wound. This tongue, then, of the one mighty in wickedness, devising iniquity, has worked deceit: that is, the tongue which nature had prepared for uttering the rational thoughts of a deliberating heart itself thinks irrational iniquities. For that people, which is to be understood as signified in Doeg, chosen to magnify the name of God and prepared to celebrate his praises, dishonours him, betrays him, and, as far as it can, destroys him by the death of the cross; and it accomplishes this with the razor of its tongue, with which it cried, "Crucify, crucify." So this tongue, devising iniquity, worked deceit like a sharp razor; and what kind of deceit, what follows teaches.
51.9CSEL 22:103–104
Sequitur enim: dilexisti malitiam super benignitatem, iniquitatem super quam loqui iustitiam. doli huius crimen ex conparatione fit grauius, cum malitia diligitur bonitate neglecta, cum iniquitas agitur praetermisso sermone iustitise. hunc propensae in malitiam dilectionis adfectum dominus in euangeliis condemnat dicens: hoc est autem iudicium, quia lux uenit in hunc mundum et dilexerunt homines magis tenebras quam lumen. populus itaque, cui ad redemptionem peccatorum uerbum caro factum est et deus homo natus est, ut per fidei iustificationem maledicto legis liber esset, dum in transgressione legis mauult seruire maledicto, ipsum illum deum suum tradidit p“nse, sanguinem eius, ut prsetor esset innocens, in se ipse suscipiens. et haec agens demutat naturae consuetudinem. malitiam enim diligit super benignitatem et ex bonis amorem conuertit in pessima. diligere quoque iniustitiam super quam loqui iustitiam maluit.
For there follows: "You have loved wickedness more than kindness, iniquity more than speaking righteousness." The crime of this deceit becomes heavier by comparison, when wickedness is loved and goodness neglected, when iniquity is done and the word of righteousness passed over. The Lord condemns this disposition of love inclined to wickedness in the Gospels, saying: "And this is the judgment, that the light has come into this world, and men loved darkness rather than light." So the people for whose redemption from sins the Word became flesh and God was born man, so that through the justification of faith they might be free of the curse of the law, preferring to serve the curse in transgressing the law, handed over to punishment that very God of theirs, taking his blood upon themselves so that the governor might be innocent. And doing this they change the custom of nature: for they love wickedness more than kindness and turn love from good things to the worst. They preferred also to love injustice more than to speak righteousness.
51.10CSEL 22:104
Tenuit uero secundum Iudaicam consuetudinem propheticus sermo in ipsa sermonum uirtute rationem, cum ait: dilexisti malitiam super benignitatem, iniustitiam super quam loqui iustitiam. nam ubi ait: dilexisti malitiam super benignitatem, nihil ultra quam dilectionem ipsam ex conparatione condemnat. ubi uero ait: iniustitiam super quam loqui iustitiam, ibi coarguit non iam praelati amoris adfectum, sed ipsum illum odium in loquendo dicens: super quam loqui iustitiam. possunt enim et solent Iudaei, licet non ament bonitatem, tamen eam uel loquendo simulare. at uero loqui de domino nostro Iesu Christo. qui secundum beatum apostolum Paulum factus est nobis iustitia et sanctificatio et redemptio, nullo modo possunt. non continentur ad aliquam sermonis patientiam, cum quando ex propheticis auctoritatibus ostenditur a nobis unigenitus deus, qui ante ssecula natus est, in homine et passus et crucifixus et mortuus; tum enim omne de eo eloquium et uitant et fugiunt: et si discedendi quoquam locus nullus sit, ui quadam taciti doloris oppressi aures manibus obstruunt et auditum, ne in se penetret, excludunt, bonitatem quidem tantum non amantes, interdum tamen eam loquentes, ceterum iustitiam nec diligentes. quia Christus est, nec loquentes.
The prophetic word, according to Jewish custom, kept a reasoning in the very force of the words when it said: "You have loved wickedness more than kindness, injustice more than speaking righteousness." For where it says, "You have loved wickedness more than kindness," it condemns nothing beyond the love itself, by comparison. But where it says, "injustice more than speaking righteousness," there it rebukes not the disposition of a preferred love but hatred itself in speaking, saying "more than speaking righteousness." For the Jews can and often do, though they do not love goodness, at least feign it in speaking. But they cannot in any way speak of our Lord Jesus Christ, who according to the blessed apostle Paul became for us righteousness, sanctification, and redemption. They are not held to any patience of speech when we show from prophetic authorities that the only-begotten God, born before the ages, suffered, was crucified, and died in the man; then they avoid and flee every word about him; and if there is no place to go away to, overcome by a kind of force of silent grief, they stop their ears with their hands and shut out hearing so that it may not penetrate to them. They do not love goodness, but sometimes speak of it; righteousness, however, since it is Christ, they neither love nor speak.
51.11CSEL 22:104–105
Intercessio diapsalmse, etsi personse non adtulerit conuersionem, tamen sensus fecisse intellegitur demutationem. nam cum et eius, cuius antea. et ad eum, ad quem antea. sermo sit. idem tamen sermo aliud nunc quam ante significat. et quidem superiora querellis grauia fuerunt. adeo ut ex prophetse dolore. antequam edicerentur. increpita sint: cum iniustitiam lingua cogitat, cum tamquam nouacula acuta dolum efficit, cum malitia super bonitatem diligitur et iniustitia' super iustitiae eloquium est. propter quse quaedam quasi prophetse accusatio apud deum prsemissa est arguentis, cum dicitur: quid gloriatur in malitia potens iniquitatem tota die? et ne inanis quereli» dolor reperiretur, ipsa querellse causa subiecta est.
The insertion of the diapsalma, though it brought no change of person, is understood to have made a change of sense. For although the discourse is both of the same person as before and to the same person as before, yet the same discourse now signifies something other than before. The earlier things were heavy with complaints, so much so that, through the prophet's grief, they were rebuked before they were stated: when the tongue devises injustice, when like a sharp razor it works deceit, when wickedness is loved more than goodness and injustice more than speaking righteousness. For these reasons a kind of accusation of the prophet as accuser before God was set first, when it is said: "Why does the mighty one boast in wickedness, of iniquity all day long?" And so that the grief of the complaint should not be found empty, the very cause of the complaint was added.
51.12CSEL 22:105–106
Nunc uero intercedente diapsalma non pra>cessit querella, sed demonstrata ante causa peccati grauissima tum haec damnationis est subiecta sententia: dilexisti omnia uerba praecipitationis, linguam dolosam: propterea deus destruet te in finem, euellat te et emigret te de tabernaculo et radicem tuam de terra uiuentium. eo exemplo. quo in Genesi dictum legimus his uerbis: quia fecisti hoc, maledictus tu a terra. et rursum: quia audisti uocem mulieris tute; sed et ab apostolo, cum grauissima humanse impietatis crimina percensuisset. itadictum: propter hoc tradidit eos deus in reprobum sensum: ita et nunc: dilexisti uerba prsecipitationis, linguam dolosam: propterea deus destruet te in finem. uerbi uirtutem latinus sermo non tenuit. quae enim nobiscum uerba praecipitationis sunt, ea a Graecis τὰ ῥήματα καταποντισμοῦ commemorata sunt: quo dicto significatur id, quod nobiscum prsecipitatio est, cum illis esse demersio in profundo maris. potest autem nobiscum secundum generalem sensum praecipitatio non in mari tantum, sed ex editis aut aedium aut rupium aut quorumcumque generum locis decidentium casus intellegi. ergo secundum demonstratam praecipitationis rationem, quia uerba praecipitationis Doec dilexerit, seuerissimae damnationi subiectus est.
Now, however, with the diapsalma intervening, complaint does not go first; rather, the most grievous cause of sin having been shown before, this sentence of condemnation is then added: "You have loved all words of casting down, a deceitful tongue; therefore God will destroy you to the end, he will pluck you out and remove you from the tabernacle, and your root from the land of the living." It follows the example we read in Genesis in these words: "Because you have done this, cursed are you from the earth"; and again: "Because you have listened to the voice of your wife"; and also from the apostle, who, after listing the most grievous crimes of human ungodliness, said thus: "Therefore God handed them over to a reprobate mind." So now too: "You have loved words of casting down, a deceitful tongue; therefore God will destroy you to the end." The Latin language has not kept the force of the word. For what we have as "words of casting down" the Greeks have rendered ta rhēmata katapontismou: by which is signified that what is for us a casting down is for them a sinking into the depth of the sea. With us, according to the general sense, "casting down" can be understood not only in the sea but as the fall of those who drop from high places, whether buildings or cliffs or places of any kind. So, according to the meaning of casting down that has been shown, because Doeg loved words of casting down, he is subjected to most severe condemnation.
51.13CSEL 22:106–107
Omnis etenim anima infidelis, in saeculi huius tamquam maris profundo naufraga, incerto motu uagoque differtur et diuersarum cupiditatum aestu mobilis fluctuat, potestate diaboli saeculum incolentis inlusa, et nulla ad resistendum obnitendumque ei subiectae soliditatis firmitate consistit: ex quo facile est, incentiuis circumagentium cupiditatum pendulam uagamque iactari. quod autem saeculi huius motus atque fluctus undantis maris sit aestibus conparatus, qui dominantis sit diaboli incolatus, secundum propheticam et allegoricam intellegentiam psalmus centesimus et tertius sub corporali tamen creaturarum significatione demonstrat: Hoc mare magnum et spatiosum, illic serpentes, quorum non est numerus. animalia pusilla et magna: illic naues pertransibunt draco iste, quem formasti ad inludendum ei. et rursum in psalmo sexagesimo octauo: ueni in altitudinem maris. et tempestas demersit me. unigenitus itaque dei filius, dei verbum et deus uerbum, ad eruendos nos ex profundo sseculi huius naufragio descendit doctrinse suse reti, cui regnum caelorum simile est, haec uniuersa piscium genera extracturus. ab impio populo proditur et inhonoratur; seseque populus conformatus ad inludendum draconi socium ipse demergit et in hoc se profundum ad incolatus eius consortium praecipitat. sic et incredulus Moysi Aegyptiorum populus praecipitari demergique meruit, et impiam gentem refusi in se maris fluctus absorbuit, prsecipitationis uerba tunc, cum deo obstitit, diligentem.
For every unbelieving soul, shipwrecked in the depth of this world as in a sea, is carried about with uncertain and wandering motion and tosses unsteadily on the swell of different desires, mocked by the power of the devil, who inhabits the world; and it stands on no firm solid ground beneath it from which to resist and push back against him. From this it is easily tossed about, hanging and wandering, by the incitements of the desires that drive it around. That the motion and waves of this world are compared to the swell of the surging sea, which is the dwelling of the ruling devil, the hundred and third psalm shows according to prophetic and allegorical understanding, yet under the bodily signification of creatures: "This great and wide sea, there are serpents without number, small and great creatures; there ships will pass; that dragon which you formed to mock him." And again in the sixty-eighth psalm: "I came into the depth of the sea, and the storm sank me." So the only-begotten Son of God, the Word of God and God the Word, came down to rescue us from shipwreck in the depth of this world, to draw out all these kinds of fish with the net of his teaching, to which the kingdom of heaven is like. He is betrayed and dishonoured by the ungodly people; and that people, conforming itself to the dragon as companion in mocking, sinks itself and casts itself down into this depth to share his dwelling. So too the people of the Egyptians, unbelieving toward Moses, deserved to be cast down and drowned, and the waves of the sea pouring back upon itself swallowed the ungodly nation, which loved words of casting down when it opposed God.
51.14CSEL 22:107
Quia igitur Iudseorum populus incredulus et regem suum prodens uerba prsecipitationis dilexit, dicens: regem non habeo nisi Csesarem, deo rege neglecto et rege homine confesso in hoc se saeculi profundum ipse demersit; ideo in finem destruitur — usque in consummationem enim saeculi regnum destructae ciuitatis amisit — et de tabernaculo euulsus et transmigratus est: uagus nunc in toto orbe terrarum et ubique peregrinus consummatis omnibus suis in domini passione peccatis.
Because, then, the people of the Jews, unbelieving and betraying its king, loved words of casting down, saying, "I have no king but Caesar," neglecting God as king and confessing a man as king, it sank itself into this depth of the world. Therefore it is destroyed to the end (for it has lost the kingdom of its destroyed city until the consummation of the age), and it has been plucked from the tabernacle and removed: now wandering in the whole world and everywhere a stranger, all its sins having been completed in the Lord's passion.
51.15CSEL 22:107–108
Quia prsecipitationis uerba dilexit, tabernaculo illo caret, in quo propheta semper dei spiritu plenus fuit, in quo sanctarum uirtutum tremendae contemplationes et salutares uisiones exstiterunt, in quo hostiarum ad redemptionem animse utiles oblationes, in quo paschae agnus in clade Aegypti fidelium custos et in liminum sanguine potens signum, in quo aemulae aeternorum temporum temporariae festiuitates. ab hoc itaque tabernaculo euulsi his spiritalium donorum honoribus carent.
Because it loved words of casting down, it lacks that tabernacle in which the prophet was always full of the Spirit of God, in which arose awesome contemplations of holy powers and saving visions, in which were the useful offerings of sacrifices for the redemption of the soul, in which was the Passover lamb, guardian of the faithful in the slaughter of Egypt and a mighty sign in the blood on the doorposts, in which were temporary festivals imitating eternal times. Plucked from this tabernacle, then, they lack these honours of spiritual gifts.
51.16CSEL 22:108–109
Euulsi autem sunt non ex hoc terreno tantum tabernaculo, sed et ex illo, de quo dictum est: eleuabo Dauid tabernaculum, quod cecidit: sanctum illud scilicet et uenerabile nati ex uirgine dei corpus et templum, in quo, qui crediderit, tamquam consors dominicae carnis habitabit. omnis autem infidelis a cognatione hac non crediti corporis, id est dei tabernaculo reuelletur et emigrabitur, spiritalis huius tabernaculi indignus habitaculo: quod significare dominus intellegitur, cum dicit: ego sum uitis uera, uos estis propagines, pater meus agricola est. omnis propago in me non manens neque ferens fructum eradicabitur. et omnem propaginem in me manentem emundabit eam pater meus, ut fructum ampliorem ferat. si qui igitur per fidem corporati dei manere in natura adsumpti a deo corporis merebuntur, hi emundantur in fructus aeternos ex se adferendos: quia necesse est, ut naturam uerre uitis propago intra uitem manens teneat. at uero qui incredulus nati in corpore dei fuerit, uel si et credens maneat, fructibus tamen fidei suae careat, eradicabitur aut ob infidelitatem aut ob inutilitatem fructuum negatorum. natus enim ex uirgine dei filius, non tum primum dei filius cum filius hominis, sed in filio dei etiam filius hominis, ut et filius hominis esset dei filius, naturam in se uniuersse carnis adsumpsit, per quam effectus uera uitis genus in se uniuersae propaginis tenet. si qua ergo propago infidelis aut infructuosa est, eradicandam ipsa se praebet; per naturam quidem manens, sed per infidelitatem aut inutilitatem reuellitur. ex hoc ergo tabernaculo, tamquam ei uera uite, hic impius Doec et euellitur et emigratur, manens per naturam et in tabernaculo et in uite, sed per infidelitatem dignus auelli.
They have been plucked not only from this earthly tabernacle but also from that of which it is said, "I will raise up the tabernacle of David that has fallen": that holy and venerable body and temple of God born of the virgin, in which whoever believes will dwell as a sharer in the Lord's flesh. But every unbeliever will be plucked away and removed from this kinship with the body he did not believe in, that is, from the tabernacle of God, being unworthy to dwell in this spiritual tabernacle. The Lord is understood to signify this when he says: "I am the true vine, you are the branches, my Father is the vinedresser. Every branch that does not abide in me and bear fruit will be uprooted. And every branch that abides in me my Father will cleanse, that it may bear more fruit." If, then, any through faith in God made flesh deserve to remain in the nature of the body assumed by God, they are cleansed to bring forth eternal fruits from themselves, because a branch remaining in the vine must hold the nature of the true vine. But whoever is unbelieving toward God born in the body, or, even if believing, still lacks the fruits of his faith, will be uprooted either for unbelief or for the uselessness of fruits withheld. For the Son of God born of the virgin, not first Son of God when he became son of man, but also son of man in the Son of God, so that the son of man might be Son of God, assumed in himself the nature of all flesh, through which, made the true vine, he holds in himself the kind of every branch. If, then, any branch is unbelieving or fruitless, it offers itself to be uprooted; remaining by nature, yet torn away by unbelief or uselessness. From this tabernacle, then, as from the true vine, this ungodly Doeg is both plucked and removed, remaining by nature both in the tabernacle and in the vine, but deserving by unbelief to be torn away.
51.17CSEL 22:109
Auulsus autem de tabernaculo eradicabitur et de uiuentium terra. qui enim non manebit in Christo, regni Christi incola non erit; non erit autem, non quod sibi non patuerit incolatus — uniuersis enim patet, ut consortes sint corporis dei atque regni; quia uerbum caro factum est et inhabitauit in nobis, naturam scilicet in se totius humani generis adsumens —, sed unusquisque pro merito se et euellendum de tabernaculo et eradicandum de terra uiuentium praebet, non prohibitus umquam inesse. quia per naturae adsumptionem incola sit receptus; sed eradicatur ob infidelitatis crimen, naturse consortio indignus exsistens. eradicatur ergo de uiuentium terra, quae in beata regione sanctis domino conregnantibus prseparatur; cuius ipse in euangelio meminit, dicens: beati mansueti, quoniam ipsi hereditabunt terram; et hic idem propheta: et placebo domino in regione uiuentium, a qua proditor populus eradicari meruit, postquam destructus in finem a tabernaculo et emigratus est et auulsus.
Torn from the tabernacle, he will also be uprooted from the land of the living. For whoever does not remain in Christ will not be an inhabitant of Christ's kingdom; and he will not be, not because the dwelling was not open to him (for it is open to all, that they may share in the body and kingdom of God, since the Word became flesh and dwelt in us, assuming in himself the nature of the whole human race), but each, according to his merit, offers himself to be torn from the tabernacle and uprooted from the land of the living, never forbidden to be in it, since through the assumption of nature he was received as an inhabitant; but he is uprooted for the crime of unbelief, showing himself unworthy of sharing that nature. He is uprooted, then, from the land of the living, which is being prepared in the blessed region for the saints who reign with the Lord; which he himself mentions in the Gospel, saying, "Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth"; and this same prophet: "And I will please the Lord in the land of the living," from which the treacherous people deserved to be uprooted after it was destroyed to the end and removed and torn from the tabernacle.
51.18CSEL 22:109–110
Viuorum autem idcirco terra est, quia omnis fidelis in domino, licet mortuus sit, deo tamen uiuat, ut dictum est: ego sum deus Abraham et deus Isaac et deus Iacob: non est deus mortuorum, sed uiuorum. et rursum per Iacob: uiuat Ruben et non moriatur; et illud: Ismael hic uiuat in conspectu tuo. sed et illud apostoli — si ita tamen legenti uidebitur, quia duplicem sensus significationem habet —: et nos, qui uiuimus, qui residui erimus, rapiemur cum nubibus obuiam Christo in aera: et sic semper cum domino erimus. interceptio quidem corporum adfert temporarium mortis occasum; sed lex constituta moriendi legem non adimit resurgendi: quia decernenti legem lex non adfert necessitatem, neque sibi deus ius uiuificandi ademit legem nobis decernendo moriendi. mors autem in eos tantum, in quos est decreta, legitima est. uiuunt autem deo omnes, ex cuius lege sunt mortui. neque mors. quae non nisi per legem decernentis inualuit, potest per se in id inualescere, ne per decernentem renouandae uitae legem demutabilis sit lege uiuendi, cum decernentis potestas constitutam ab exordio in Adam sub condicione decreti uitam legis demutauerit lege moriendi. uiuunt itaque sancti quique et fideles deo. nam cum se deum eorum, qui mortui fuerant, id est Abrahse et Isaac et Iacob esse dicat et continuo testetur, non mortuorum se, sed uiuorum deum esse, docet per id, eos, qui iudicio humanse opinionis mortui existimentur, sibi legem decernenti non mortuos esse, sed uiuos.
It is the land of the living because every believer in the Lord, though he has died, lives to God, as it is said: "I am the God of Abraham and the God of Isaac and the God of Jacob; he is not the God of the dead but of the living." And again through Jacob: "Let Reuben live and not die"; and that saying: "Let Ishmael live in your sight." And also the apostle's saying (if it seems so to the reader, since it has a double meaning): "And we who are alive, who shall remain, shall be caught up with the clouds to meet Christ in the air; and so we shall always be with the Lord." The cutting off of bodies brings a temporary setting of death; but the law appointed for dying does not take away the law of rising, because a law brings no necessity on him who decrees the law, nor did God take from himself the right of giving life by decreeing for us the law of dying. Death is lawful only over those against whom it is decreed. But all live to God, by whose law they died. Nor can death, which prevailed only through the law of the one who decrees, prevail of itself so as not to be changeable by the law of living through the one who decrees the law of renewing life, since the power of the one who decrees changed, by the law of dying, the life established from the beginning in Adam under the condition of a decree. So all saints and faithful live to God. For when he says he is the God of those who had died, that is, of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, and at once testifies that he is the God not of the dead but of the living, he teaches by this that those who are thought dead in the judgment of human opinion are not dead to him who decrees the law, but living.
51.19CSEL 22:110–112
Intercessio diapsalmse, etsi non personam, sensum tamen innouauit. nam post prsenuntiatam Doec damnationem, ad quem tamquam ad praesentem fuit sermo, nunc ad alterius expositionis significationem se rettulit propheta: uidebunt iusti et timebunt et rident super eum et dicent: ecce homo, qui non posuit deum adiutorem suum, sed sperauit in multitudine diuitiarum suarum et praeualuit in uanitate sua. destructo Doec in finem et euulso de tabernaculo atque emigrato et de terra uiuentium eradicato sancti quique necesse est metuant: cum uideant tot tantisque diuinae misericordise auxiliis populum adiutum atque usum post ingentem illam et ultra humanas opes gloriosi regni dignitatem maximum de se atque ultimum humanae calamitatis exemplum praebuisse. qui enim memoria recenseat antiquas gloriae eius et innumeras beatitudines, quas superius pro parte memorauimus, cum post Aegypti funera itineri eorum diuisum mare cessit, cum ardorem diei nubis columna inumbrauit, cum noctis tenebras ignis columna discussit, cum cibum caelum per angelos praebuit, cum fontem petra fluxit. cum Iordanes refluxit, cum ciuitas magna ad solum areae testamenti circuitum concidit, cum sol de cursu suo inhibitus diem distulit, et diuinae legis ordo ex illo elementorum indefesso inperturbatoque motu ad belli moram restitit: post illam deinde diuinae maiestatis et conspectus et auditus familiaritatem consumptos eos bellis, fame emortuos et antea mortuorum cadaueribus ad mortem famis pastos, reliquos deinde in seruitutem redactos exules ubique, ubique esse degeneres, nusquam cognitos, semper nouos et demutatione incolatus semper ignobiles, semper alienos? iam si spiritales quis oculos erigat, de quibus dominus ait: eleuate oculos uestros uidete regiones, quia albae sunt ad messem, tum sciat auulsos esse ex consortio corporis dei, ex illo beatitudinis regno, ex illo resurrectionis honore et esse sine dei spiritu, sine intellegentia prophetise constitutosque gehennae pabulum. quos inmortalis uermis exesurus sit et inextinguibilis ignis crematurus, quorum sciat legislationem, quorum testamenta, quorum patres, ex quibus Christus secundum carnem, qui est super omnia deus. quanto ergo has demutationes eorum et praesentes et aeternas calamitates sancti quique metu contuebuntur, quia punitorum contemplatio sit terribilis exemplo? uidebunt ergo iusti et timebunt, nihil non sibi metuendum in tanta horum calamitate intellegentes. sed quia iusti sunt, licet timeant de exemplo, tamen de fructu propriae iustitiae gaudebunt. ridebunt enim super eum: ridentes igitur et timentes. quia deo subditi sunt, punitorum seueritate terribili. temperat ergo metum risus, dum et metus de exemplo et risus ex merito est. moderatur autem rursum metus risum, dum ita gaudebunt in bonis, ne desit terror exempli: quia impise et diffidentis de se conscientiae est, timere sine gaudio et insolentis naturse est, sine timore gaudere.
The insertion of the diapsalma renewed, if not the person, at least the sense. For after the condemnation of Doeg had been announced, to whom the discourse was addressed as if present, the prophet now turned to the meaning of another exposition: "The righteous will see and fear, and they will laugh at him and say: Behold the man who did not make God his helper, but hoped in the abundance of his riches and prevailed in his vanity." When Doeg has been destroyed to the end, plucked from the tabernacle, removed, and uprooted from the land of the living, all the saints must fear, when they see that a people helped and supported by so many and such great aids of divine mercy, after that immense dignity of a glorious kingdom beyond human resources, has given of itself the greatest and last example of human calamity. For who could recall its ancient glories and countless blessings, which we partly mentioned above: when, after the deaths of Egypt, the sea parted and gave way to their journey; when the pillar of cloud shaded the heat of the day; when the pillar of fire scattered the darkness of night; when heaven gave food through angels; when the rock flowed with a spring; when the Jordan flowed back; when a great city fell at the mere circling of the ark of the testament; when the sun, held back from its course, prolonged the day, and the order of divine law, departing from that tireless and undisturbed motion of the elements, stood still to delay the battle; and then, after that familiarity with seeing and hearing the divine majesty, could see them consumed by wars, dead of famine, and before that fed to the death of famine on the corpses of the dead, the rest then reduced to slavery, exiles everywhere, everywhere degenerate, nowhere known, always new and always obscure by change of dwelling, always foreigners? And if anyone raises his spiritual eyes, of which the Lord says, "Lift up your eyes and see the fields, for they are white for harvest," then let him know that they have been torn from fellowship in the body of God, from that kingdom of blessedness, from that honour of the resurrection, and are without the Spirit of God, without the understanding of prophecy, and appointed as fodder for Gehenna, to be eaten by the undying worm and burned by the unquenchable fire; though he knows that theirs was the giving of the law, theirs the covenants, theirs the fathers, from whom is Christ according to the flesh, who is God over all. With how much fear, then, will all the saints look upon these changes and present and eternal calamities of theirs, since the sight of the punished is terrifying by its example? The righteous will see, then, and fear, understanding that there is nothing they need not fear in so great a calamity. But because they are righteous, though they fear the example, they will rejoice in the fruit of their own righteousness. For they will laugh at him: laughing, then, and fearing, because they are subject to God, whose severity toward the punished is terrible. Laughter tempers fear, since fear comes from the example and laughter from merit. Fear in turn moderates laughter, since they will rejoice in good things in such a way that the terror of the example is not lacking; for to fear without joy belongs to an ungodly conscience distrustful of itself, and to rejoice without fear belongs to an insolent nature.
51.20CSEL 22:112–113
Sed qui timentes ridebunt, id quoque adicient ad hunc moderatum in timore risum, ut dicant: ecce homo, qui non posuit deum adiutorem suum. stultitise impietatis extremae est, non intellegere sub deo et ex deo uiuere, sed in his, quse gerit et expectat, sua magis uelle confidere potestate, eam, si quid illud in se sit, ex deo sit. ad deum itaque spes omnis nostra sit et confessio omnis in deo sit exemplo prophetse dicentis: domine, adiutor meus et redemptor meus et rursum: leuaui oculos meos in montes, unde ueniet adiutorium mihi. auxilium meum a domino, qui fecit caelum et terram. metuamus itaque semper, ne quando nos aeternus ille ignis urat et uermis inmortalis absumat, cum audiamus quid iusti timentes ridentesque dicant: ecce homo, qui non posuit deum adiutorem suum, sed sperauit in multitudine diuitiarum suarum.
But those who laugh while fearing will add this too to their laughter tempered by fear, saying: "Behold the man who did not make God his helper." It is the folly of extreme ungodliness not to understand that one lives under God and from God, but to wish rather to trust in one's own power in what one does and hopes for, when that power, if there is any in oneself, comes from God. So let all our hope be toward God and all our confession be in God, after the example of the prophet who says, "Lord, my helper and my redeemer"; and again: "I lifted up my eyes to the mountains, from where my help will come. My help is from the Lord, who made heaven and earth." Let us always fear, then, lest that eternal fire burn us and the undying worm consume us, when we hear what the righteous, fearing and laughing, say: "Behold the man who did not make God his helper, but hoped in the abundance of his riches."
51.21CSEL 22:113–114
Diuites quosdam insolentes esse praestat opulentia, et maxime timorem dei diuitiarum fiducia inanis auertit: stulti, non intellegentes hoc se magis religiosos oportere esse, quod. diuites sunt, quia gratiam referre largitori bonorum sibi desiderabilium conueniat, et hoc magis inexcusabilis sit auaritise reatus, quia auaritise necessitatem non excuset opulentia. iam uero quam infelix fiducia est rei inanis: deum contemnere habendo aurum, quasi aurum non ex dei sit creaturis, aut aliquis per id iudicio sanae mentis beatae uita adquirat profectum, quod sibi aurum iaceat suffossum, et hinc fiat non generalis animae et corporis homo aliusque possit esse, quam natus est, aut cum uita excedat, auro suo sit usurus in morte! utetur plane, si eo recte utetur in uita, si esurientem pane suo aluerit, si nudum ueste sua texerit, aut aegrum sumptu suo refouerit, aut captiuum libertati suae redemerit, haec sunt plane ambitiosse apud deum humani thensauri legationes, haec potentia deprecandorum criminum et uera suffragia. sic auro demutabimur, ut ex terrenis caelestes et ex mortalibus simus aeterni, haec infidelis illa populus non cogitans et dei mandata contemnens putansque se per legem, quae futurorum bonorum umbra est, esse diuitem, adeptis diuitiis male usus, ex uiuentium terra et tabernaculo eradicatus et emigratus, auulsus est: praepotentem se in uanitatibus credens, in regni scilicet sui gloria, in templi auro, in mandatis hominum, secundum prophetam dicentem: sine causa colunt me, docentes doctrinas et praecepta hominum, dei lege contumeliosa humanae consuetudinis obseruatione mutata.
Wealth makes some rich men insolent, and empty confidence in riches above all turns away the fear of God: fools, who do not understand that they ought to be the more devout because they are rich, since it befits them to return thanks to the giver of the goods they desire, and the guilt of avarice is the more inexcusable because wealth does not excuse the necessity of avarice. How unhappy is confidence in an empty thing: to despise God by having gold, as if gold were not one of God's creatures, or as if anyone, in the judgment of a sound mind, could gain advancement toward a blessed life because gold lies buried for him, and thereby become a man not of the common soul and body, and be other than he was born; or as if, when he leaves life, he would use his gold in death! He will indeed use it, if he uses it rightly in life: if he feeds the hungry with his bread, covers the naked with his clothing, relieves the sick at his own expense, or redeems the captive to freedom. These indeed are the influential embassies of human treasure before God; this is the power of begging off crimes, these are true votes in our favour. Thus we shall be changed by gold, so that from earthly we become heavenly and from mortal eternal. That unbelieving people, not considering these things and despising God's commandments, thinking itself rich through the law, which is the shadow of good things to come, having made bad use of the riches it obtained, was uprooted, removed, and torn from the land of the living and from the tabernacle: believing itself all-powerful in vanities, namely in the glory of its kingdom, in the gold of the temple, in the commandments of men, as the prophet says: "In vain do they worship me, teaching the doctrines and precepts of men," the law of God having been changed by the insulting observance of human custom.
51.22CSEL 22:114–115
Propheta autem, quem necesse est iustum esse intellegi, aliter de se fiducia spei suse loquitur: ego autem, sicut. oliua fructifera in domo dei, speraui in misericordia dei in aeternum et in sseculum saeculi. differt quidem tempore aetas hominum, sed prophetise spiritus idem est. propheta manere se in domo dei sicut oliuam fructiferam dicit, arborem semper uirentem et fructus optimi feracem. apostolus huic olese, prsefractis ob infidelitatem ramis eius, fideles gentes ex ignobili oleastro esse insitas praedicat, ut contra naturam generis naturam radicis acciperent. sed propheta, in lege licet manens, euangelicus tamen propheta simul et in lege et in euangeliis cum fructu suo in domo dei esse persistit: non perfringendus in ramis, non relinquendus in truncum, non inutilis iam ipse inserendo sibi praebendus oleastro, nec radicis suae uirtutem arbori transfusurus aliense, sed totus integer, ut est fidei apostolicse praedicator; non ex gentibus radici legis ad fidem euangelicam inserendus, sed etiam in gentium euangelica fide propriae radicis suae ramorumque uirtute totus ipse ex legis pingui conscientia fructuosus. est autem dei domus secundum apostolum Petrum ecclesia et omnes fidei euangelicae sectatores, sicut ait: sedificanmini domus spiritalis, regnum sacerdotale. et Paulus: ut scias, quemadmodum oporteat in domo dei deuersari, quae est ecclesia dei uiuentis, columna et firmamentum ueritatis. in hac igitur dei domo iustus et sanctus propheta, tamquam fructifera oliua consistens, propria sua usus fructuosa pinguique radice sperauit in misericordia dei; non ad tempus, non in huius corporalis tantum uitae breui saeculo, sed in saeculum saeculi. extendit enim spes suas ad infinitam perennitatis aetatem nec concluditur mortis occasu, cum sciat sibi in Abrahae sinibus exemplo pauperis Lazari esse uiuendum, sciat quoque gloriosae resurrectionis demutatione coaeternum se et conformem deo esse mansurum, mansurum autem ob id, quod sequitur: confitebor tibi, domine, in saeculum, quia fecisti: et expectabo nomen tuum, quoniam bonum ante conspectum sanctorum tuorum.
But the prophet, who must be understood to be righteous, speaks otherwise of himself with confidence in his hope: "But I, like a fruitful olive tree in the house of God, have hoped in the mercy of God for ever and for age upon age." The ages of men differ in time, but the spirit of prophecy is the same. The prophet says he remains in the house of God like a fruitful olive, a tree always green and bearing the best fruit. The apostle proclaims that into this olive, after its branches were broken off for unbelief, the believing Gentiles were grafted from the base wild olive, so that contrary to the nature of their kind they might receive the nature of the root. But the prophet, though remaining in the law, is yet a gospel prophet, and continues with his fruit in the house of God both in the law and in the Gospels: not to be broken in his branches, not to be left a trunk, not to be offered, now useless, to have the wild olive grafted onto him, nor to pour the power of his root into a foreign tree; but wholly intact, as he is a preacher of the apostolic faith; not one to be grafted from the Gentiles onto the root of the law for gospel faith, but, even in the gospel faith of the Gentiles, himself wholly fruitful by the power of his own root and branches from the rich conscience of the law. The house of God, according to the apostle Peter, is the church and all followers of the gospel faith, as he says: "Be built up as a spiritual house, a priestly kingdom." And Paul: "That you may know how one ought to behave in the house of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and foundation of the truth." In this house of God, then, the righteous and holy prophet, standing like a fruitful olive, using his own fruitful and rich root, hoped in the mercy of God; not for a time, not only in the short age of this bodily life, but for age upon age. For he stretches his hopes to the infinite age of perpetuity and is not shut in by the setting of death, since he knows that he is to live in Abraham's bosom after the example of poor Lazarus, and knows too that by the change of the glorious resurrection he will remain co-eternal and conformed to God; and he will remain because of what follows: "I will confess to you, Lord, for ever, because you have done it; and I will wait for your name, for it is good in the sight of your saints."
51.23CSEL 22:115–117
Spes in misericordia dei in saeculum et in saeculum saeculi est. non enim ipsa illa iustitiae opera sufficient ad perfectae beatitudinis meritum, nisi misericordia dei etiam in hac iustitiae uoluntate humanarum demutationum et motuum uitia non reputet. hinc illud prophetae dictum est: melior misericordia tua super uitam: quia, quamuis probabilis per iustitiae operationem uita iustorum sit, tamen per misericordiam dei plus meriti consequetur. ex hac enim uita in uitam proficiet aeternam; et operationem iustitiae in tantum dei misericordia muneratur, ut, miserans iustitisae uoluntatem, aeternitatis quoque suae iustum quemque tribuat esse participem. idcirco in saeculum et in saeculum saeculi misericordia? spes est: sed confessio tantum in saeculum, non etiam in saeculum saeculi. non enim confessio peccatorum nisi in huius saeculi tempore est, dum uoluntati suae unusquisque permissus est et per uitae licentiam habet confessionis arbitrium. decedentes namque de uita simul et iure decedimus uoluntatis. tune enim ex merito praeteritae uoluntatis lex iam constituta. aut quietis aut poenae excedentium ex corpore suscipit uoluntatem. cuius temporis non iam liberam, sed necessariam uoluntatem ostendit propheta, cum dicit: non est mihi in diebus illis uoluntas. cessante enim uoluntatis libertate etiam uoluntatis, si qua erit, cessabit effectus. transire namque ad. Abraham uolens diues chao medio non sinitur, cum tamen per libertatem uoluntatis in Abrahae sinibus esse potuisset. interclusa est ergo libertas uoluntatis, quia confessio nulla est mortuis, secundum id, quod dictum est: in inferno autem quis confitebitur tibi? sperans ergo propheta misericordiam in saeculum et in saeculum saeculi confitetur tantum in saeculo: temporaria confessionis officia saeculi tempore gerens, spem uero aeternam saeculorum aeternitate protendens. confessionis autem causam addidit dicens: quia fecisti; auctorem scilicet uniuersitatis huius dominum esse confessus, nulli alii docens confitendum, quam qui fecit oliuam fructiferam spei misericordia in saeculum saeculi.
Hope in the mercy of God is for ever and for age upon age. For the very works of righteousness will not suffice for the merit of perfect blessedness unless the mercy of God, even in this will for righteousness, does not reckon the faults of human changes and impulses. Hence the prophet's saying: "Your mercy is better than life"; because, although the life of the righteous is approved through the working of righteousness, it will obtain greater merit through the mercy of God. For from this life it will advance into eternal life; and the mercy of God rewards the working of righteousness so far that, pitying the will for righteousness, he grants each righteous man to be a sharer even in his own eternity. Therefore the hope of mercy is for ever and for age upon age; but confession is only for ever, not also for age upon age. For confession of sins exists only in the time of this age, while each is left to his own will and, through the freedom of life, has the choice of confession. For when we depart from life we depart also from the right of will. Then the law, already established by the merit of past will, takes up the will of those who leave the body, either for rest or for punishment. The prophet shows that the will at that time is no longer free but necessary, when he says: "I have no will in those days." For when freedom of will ceases, the effect of will too, if there is any, will cease. For the rich man, wishing to cross over to Abraham, is not allowed by the chasm between, though through freedom of will he could have been in Abraham's bosom. Freedom of will is shut off, then, because there is no confession among the dead, according to what is said: "But in the underworld who will confess to you?" So the prophet, hoping for mercy for ever and for age upon age, confesses only in this age, carrying out the temporary duties of confession in the time of the age, but stretching his hope eternally to the eternity of the ages. He added the cause of confession, saying "because you have done it," confessing that the Lord is the author of this universe and teaching that confession is to be made to none other than him who made the fruitful olive of hope in mercy for age upon age.
51.24CSEL 22:117–118
Et quis hic sit, qui fecit ista, demonstrat dicens: et exspectabo nomen tuum, quoniam bonum est in conspectu sanctorum tuorum. exspectabit ergo dei nomen, cui confitetur, per quem facta sunt omnia: unus enim deus pater, ex quo omnia, et nos in ipso: et unus dominus noster Iesus Christus, per quem omnia, et nos per ipsum. huius ergo nomen exspectat, Iesum scilicet uidere, id est saluatorem suum nosse, angelo dicente: et cognominabis nomen eius Iesum; ipse enim saluum faciet populum suum a peccatis eorum. Christum conspicere, ut per professionem generosae. familiae sit christianus, exspectat. bonum autem hoc nomen est, quod archangeli atque angeli adorant, quod daemones tremunt et ferre non possunt, quod ad salutem homines adsumunt; quia scriptum est: et omnis qui inuocauerit nomen eius, hic saluus erit exspectat autem non occulte, non trepidus, non solus, sed in conspectu sanctorum eius, fide scilicet libera testimonium exspectationis suae uel sub sanctorum caelestium conscientia non recusans, uel prophetiae exemplo sanctis omnibus, qui in terra sunt, in se ipso praebens exspectationis exemplum.
And who this is who made these things he shows by saying: "And I will wait for your name, for it is good in the sight of your saints." He will wait, then, for the name of God, to whom he confesses, through whom all things were made: for there is one God the Father, from whom are all things, and we in him; and one Lord our Jesus Christ, through whom are all things, and we through him. It is his name he waits for, namely to see Jesus, that is, to know his Saviour, as the angel says: "And you shall call his name Jesus; for he will save his people from their sins." He waits to behold Christ, so that by profession of the noble family he may be a Christian. This name is good, which archangels and angels worship, at which demons tremble and which they cannot bear, which men take up for salvation; for it is written: "And everyone who calls on his name will be saved." And he waits, not secretly, not fearfully, not alone, but in the sight of his saints: that is, with free faith, not refusing the testimony of his waiting even under the knowledge of the heavenly saints, or, by the example of prophecy, offering in himself an example of waiting to all the saints who are on earth.
Tractates 52
52.1CSEL 22:118
Praesens psalmus tertio decimo psalmo paene conueniens est, sed habet in hac ipsa uerborum similitudine non exiguum intellegentiae discrimen. primum uirtute inscriptionis ipsius. nam tertius decimus ita inscribitur: in finem illius Dauid quo titulo id significatur, psalmum illum a Dauid prophetatum fuisse; hic uero: in finem pro Maeleth intellectus illi Dauid. ubi enim est: in finem intellectus, adhortationis et admonitionis est significatio, qua iubemur secundum finis cognitionem intellegentiae nostrae admouere iudicium: ut ea in psalmo denuntiari intellegamus, quae consummabuntur in fine, secundum illud apostoli: dehinc finis, cum tradiderit regnum deo patri; cum euacuauerit omnem principatum et potestatem et uirtutem, tunc et ipse subicietur subicienti sibi omnia. nouissima autem inimica euacuabitur mors. hic ergo finis est, qui intellegitur in psalmo. illud autem, quod illi Dauid psalmus inscribitur, ostenditur omnis de Christo, qui Dauid uerus est, prophetari: quia ubi illius inscribitur, ibi eum, qui dixerit, significat; ubi uero illi est, ibi eum, ad quem dicatur, ostendit.
The present psalm almost agrees with the thirteenth psalm, but in this very likeness of words it has no small difference of understanding. First, by the force of the inscription itself. For the thirteenth is inscribed thus: "For the end, of that David," by which title it is signified that that psalm was prophesied by David; but this one: "For the end, for Maeleth, understanding, to that David." For where it is "for the end, understanding," there is the meaning of an exhortation and admonition, by which we are told to bring the judgment of our understanding to the knowledge of the end, so that we may understand that those things are announced in the psalm which will be completed at the end, according to the apostle's saying: "Then the end, when he hands over the kingdom to God the Father, when he has destroyed every rule and authority and power; then he himself will also be subjected to him who subjects all things to himself. And the last enemy, death, will be destroyed." This, then, is the end that is understood in the psalm. And the fact that the psalm is inscribed "to that David" shows that the whole is prophesied of Christ, who is the true David: for where "of that" is inscribed, it signifies the one who spoke; but where it is "to that," it shows the one to whom it is spoken.
52.2CSEL 22:118–119
Dixit insipiens in corde suo: non est deus. uitii est humani, pudenda eloquia uerbis oris non audere committere, sed instinctu nequitiae interioris urgente ea intra cor eloqui: dum aduersum publici pudoris necessitatem uoluntatis iniquitate luctante, quod pudet dici, non pudet cogitari. et idcirco stultus in corde suo dicit: non est deus, quia, si uellet uerbis oris hoc eloqui, stultus esse, sicuti est, publici adsensus iudicio argueretur. quis enim mundum contuens, deum esse non sentiat? sed fit frequenter, ut, cum nos ueri necessitas ad confessionem dei cogat, oblectatio tamen uitiorum deum nobis non esse persuadeat, et quod contra fidem credimus, id tamen de consilio impii cordis eloquamur. ex quo illud dei dictum est per prophetam: populus hic labiis me honorat, cor autem eorum longe est a me; quia nolunt credere, quod negare non possunt.
"The fool has said in his heart: There is no God." It is a human vice not to dare to commit shameful utterances to the words of the mouth but, under the pressure of inner wickedness, to speak them within the heart; while the iniquity of the will struggles against the constraint of public shame, what one is ashamed to say one is not ashamed to think. And therefore the fool says in his heart, "There is no God," because if he wished to say it with the words of his mouth, he would be convicted by the judgment of public consent of being a fool, as he is. For who, looking at the world, does not perceive that God exists? But it often happens that, while the necessity of truth compels us to confess God, the delight of vices persuades us that there is no God for us, and what we believe against faith we nevertheless speak from the counsel of an ungodly heart. From this comes that saying of God through the prophet: "This people honours me with their lips, but their heart is far from me"; because they do not wish to believe what they cannot deny.
52.3CSEL 22:119–120
Causam uero huius stultissimi in corde eloquii ostendit dicens: corrupti sunt et abominabiles facti sunt in iniquitatibus. inicum est, quidquid extra legem est. et legem dei excedentes primum corruptioni subditi sunt, dehinc abominationi: quia iniquitas corruptionem adferat, corruptio autem abominationem meretur. cum enim quis transgredietur dei legem, tum deum negabit: et deum negare corruptio est. dominus enim noster ad depellendam corruptionem uerbum caro factum est. oportet enim, secundum apostolum, corruptionem uestiri incorruptione. sed qui inicus est et qui uerbum deum carnem factum esse non credit et, quia deus non sit, loquetur in corde, corruptus et abominabilis permanebit. tertius decimus psalmus pro eo, quod abominabiles facti sunt in iniquitate, ita ait: abominabiles facti sunt in adinuentionibus suis. nec differt sensus et crimen: quia homines ea, quae sibi sunt placita, sectantes diuinae legis constituta transgressi sunt.
He shows the cause of this most foolish utterance in the heart, saying: "They are corrupt and have become abominable in iniquities." Whatever is outside the law is iniquitous. And those who go beyond the law of God are subjected first to corruption, then to abomination; for iniquity brings corruption, and corruption deserves abomination. For when someone transgresses the law of God, then he will deny God; and to deny God is corruption. For our Lord, to drive away corruption, the Word became flesh; for, according to the apostle, corruption must be clothed with incorruption. But he who is iniquitous, who does not believe that God the Word became flesh, and who says in his heart that there is no God, will remain corrupt and abominable. The thirteenth psalm, instead of "they have become abominable in iniquity," says thus: "They have become abominable in their inventions." The sense and the crime do not differ, since men, following what pleases them, have transgressed the ordinances of the divine law.
52.4CSEL 22:120
Consequitur deinde haec querella: non est, qui faciat bonitatem. uersum hunc, quia inferius etiam cum accessione subiectus est, suo loco tractabimus. qui tamen nunc oportune et conpetenter adiectus est, corruptis omnibus et abominatis neminem in operibus repertum esse bonitatis: quia, cum loqui, quae bona sunt, aliquando soleamus, factis tamen ipsis difficile, quae bona sunt, exsequimur.
Then follows this complaint: "There is none who does goodness." Since this verse is repeated below with an addition, we shall treat it in its place. Yet it is fittingly and suitably added now: when all are corrupt and abominable, no one is found in works of goodness; for although we sometimes speak what is good, we do what is good with difficulty in our very deeds.
52.5CSEL 22:120–121
Ac ne indiligens dei erga homines uoluntas esse existimaretur, adiecit: dominus de caelo prospexit super filios hominum, ut uideret, si est intellegens aut requirens deum. prospectio domini de caelo frequens fuisse cognoscitur, quotiensque peccatis humani generis commotus salutis nostrae causa aut Noe ante diluuium eligit, aut Abraham iustificat per fidem, aut Isaac sponsionis suae promittit heredem, aut in Iacob posterioris populi primogenita praefigurat, aut Moysen prophetam et ducem praeficit et latorem legis instituit, aut dum. prophetas in omni tempore legis inspirat. per has igitur uirtutis suae et istius modi efficientias ad filios hominum prospexit, ut uideret, si quis esset intellegens et requirens deum.
And so that God's will toward men should not be thought careless, he added: "The Lord looked down from heaven upon the sons of men, to see if there was anyone who understands or seeks God." The Lord's looking down from heaven is known to have been frequent, whenever, moved by the sins of the human race, for our salvation he chose Noah before the flood, or justified Abraham through faith, or promised Isaac as heir of his pledge, or prefigured in Jacob the birthright of the later people, or set Moses over them as prophet and leader and appointed him giver of the law, or inspired prophets in every time of the law. Through these and such workings of his power, then, he looked down upon the sons of men to see if there was anyone who understands and seeks God.
52.6CSEL 22:121
Non est autem facile illud, ob quod deus prospicere dignatur, ut uideat: magnumque est illud, quod tam studiose, an in aliquo reperiri possit, inspicitur. prospicit enim e caelo deus, ut uideat, an se quisquam hominum intellegenter exquirat quotum enim quemque hominum inuenies, qui secundum perfectam intellegentiam deum uelit exquirere? qui primum causas creaturarum et dehinc constitutionem humani generis pertractans per rationem intellegentiae auctorem ac parentem tantae uniuersitatis exquirat? dehinc cur mundus, cur homines, cur saeculi tempora; cur patriarcha electus, cur lex constituta, cur propheta praemissus et in quem profectum causarum omnium origo constiterit? tum praeterea. quem uirtutes caelorum et angelorum ministeria et archangelorum potestates et diaboli regnum et sancti spiritus donum et deus ex deo unigenitus dei filius profectum nobis ex tam uariis officiorum generibus inpertiant hunc ergo exquirentem se per intellegentiam uirum deus uidere prospectat.
What God deigns to look down in order to see is no easy thing; and great is that which is so carefully examined to see whether it can be found in anyone. For God looks down from heaven to see whether any man seeks him with understanding. For how few men will you find who wish to seek God with perfect understanding? Who, examining first the causes of creatures and then the constitution of the human race, seeks through the reasoning of understanding the author and parent of so great a universe? Then: why the world, why men, why the times of the age; why the patriarch was chosen, why the law was established, why the prophet was sent ahead, and to what advance the origin of all causes was directed? And besides, what advance the powers of the heavens, the ministries of angels, the powers of archangels, the kingdom of the devil, the gift of the Holy Spirit, and God from God, the only-begotten Son of God, impart to us through such varied kinds of offices? This man, then, who seeks him through understanding, God looks out to see.
52.7CSEL 22:121–122
Est enim intellegentiae non exiguum meritum, Salomone dicente: intellegentia enim bona omnibus, qui inueniunt eam; et rursum per alium prophetam: o Israhel, quid deus requirit a te nisi facere iudicium et intellegere iustitiam? proprium enim intellegentia humanae rationis officium est; et idcirco nobis natura animae spiritalis inserta est, ut per eam ad intellegentiae sensum, qui solus rationis est particeps, tenderemus. sed obruti uitiis et per oblectamenta corporis natura corporeae grauitatis oppressi declinamus nos a studio intellegentis exquisitionis.
For understanding has no small merit, as Solomon says: "For understanding is good to all who find it"; and again through another prophet: "O Israel, what does God require of you but to do judgment and to understand righteousness?" For understanding is the proper function of human reason; and therefore the nature of a spiritual soul has been placed in us, so that through it we might reach toward the sense of understanding, which alone shares in reason. But overwhelmed by vices and weighed down by the heaviness of bodily nature through the delights of the body, we turn aside from the pursuit of understanding inquiry.
52.8CSEL 22:122
Declinamus autem, posteaquam esse inutiles coepimus; id enim propheticus sermo significat: omnes declinauerunt, simul inutiles facti sunt non cum declinant, inutiles fiunt; sed cum inutiles coeperint esse, declinant. et uirtutem dicti facile est ex consuetudine humanae demutationis intellegi. namque cum ex bonis esse mali coeperimus et ex prudentum familiaritate et publicae famae honestate per uitia nos et dedecora secreuerimus, effecti per id inutiles, tum omnes probabilium uirorum declinamus occursus, sectantes deuia, et praesentiam bonorum conscientiae nostrae pudore uitamus. denique Adam per peccatum inutilis factus tum dei declinauit aduentum; uiuens aliquandiu innocens et per mandatorum obseruantiam utilis familiarem sibi occursum antea dei, simul atque inutilis coepit esse, refugit.
And we turn aside after we have begun to be useless; for the prophetic word signifies this: "All have turned aside, together they have become useless." They do not become useless when they turn aside; but when they have begun to be useless, they turn aside. The force of the saying is easily understood from the habit of human change. For when from good we have begun to be bad, and have separated ourselves through vices and disgrace from the company of the prudent and the honour of public reputation, becoming useless by this, then we turn aside from every meeting with upright men, following byways, and avoid the presence of the good out of the shame of our conscience. So Adam, having become useless through sin, then turned aside from God's coming; having lived for a time innocent and useful through keeping the commandments, he fled the meeting with God, formerly familiar to him, as soon as he began to be useless.
52.9CSEL 22:122–123
Non repertis autem deum intellegenter exquirentibus et omnibus, simul atque inutiles facti sunt, declinantibus ex adfectus dolore iteratur querella dicentis: non est, qui faciat bonitatem, non est usque ad unum. grauis dei professio est et indissolubile super humana uitia iudicium, cum bonitatem usque ad unum nemo facit. et quaeretur post haec, quomodo Abel placuerit, Seth probatus sit, Enoch translatus sit, Noe reseruatus sit, Melchisedech sanctificatus sit, Abraham electus sit, Isaac heres sit, Iacob Israhel sit, Iob inculpabilis sit, Moyses amicus sit, Aaron christus sit, Dauid secundum cor dei sit, prophetae spiritales sint, apostoli caelorum claues sortiti sint, si excepto uno tantum bonus nemo sit? iam uero illud quomodo dictum intellegetur: bonus homo de bono thensauro profert bona, et illud: serue bone, intra in gaudium domini tui? quomodo enim bonus aliquis nuncupabitur nemine faciente bonitatem?
When none are found seeking God with understanding, and all turn aside as soon as they have become useless, the complaint of the speaker is repeated out of grief of heart: "There is none who does goodness, not even one." Heavy is God's declaration and indissoluble his judgment upon human vices when not even one does goodness. And it will be asked after this: how did Abel please, Seth was approved, Enoch was translated, Noah was preserved, Melchizedek was sanctified, Abraham was chosen, Isaac is heir, Jacob is Israel, Job is blameless, Moses is a friend, Aaron is an anointed one, David is after God's heart, the prophets are spiritual, the apostles received the keys of heaven, if, with the exception of only one, no one is good? And how will that saying be understood: "The good man brings forth good things from his good treasure," and that: "Good servant, enter into the joy of your lord"? For how will anyone be called good if no one does goodness?
52.10CSEL 22:123
Ac primum, ne etiam in hos, quos superius commemorauimus, iudicio dei probatissimos uiros, cadere tamquam generalis huius sententiae professionem existimemus, superiorum dictorum sensus obsistit. omnis etenim de stultis et corruptis et abominabilibus coeptus est sermo; et deo prospiciente de eaelo, ut uideret, si quis intellegenter exquirens esset, omnibus, postquam inutiles esse coeperant, declinantibus nemo repertus est bonitatem faciens usque ad unum, id est ex illis, qui et stulti et corrupti et abominabiles et, postquam inutiles facti sunt, declinantes esse coepissent: sententia in eos diuini iudicii congruente, a quibus coepit et sermo. id autem, quod ait usque ad unum, non unum excepit ex omnibus; sed omnibus inutilibus et declinantibus, cum usque ad unum bonitatem nemo facit, ne unum quidem secreuit ex omnibus. non enim ait: praeter unum, sed usque unum; et in eo, quod praeter unum est, exceptio significatur unius: in eo uero, quod usque ad unum est, uniuersitas generalis per prospicientis e caelo scientis diligentiam sub quodam speciali et personali numero continetur.
First, the sense of the preceding words prevents us from thinking that the declaration of this general sentence falls also on those whom we mentioned above, men most approved by God's judgment. For the whole discourse began about fools, the corrupt, and the abominable; and when God looked down from heaven to see if anyone sought with understanding, and all, after they had begun to be useless, turned aside, no one was found doing goodness, not even one, that is, among those who were fools, corrupt, abominable, and who, after they had become useless, had begun to turn aside; the sentence of divine judgment fitting those with whom the discourse began. And when it says "not even one," it did not except one from all; but since all were useless and turned aside, when no one does goodness, not even one, it set apart not even one from all. For it does not say "except one" but "up to one"; and in "except one" the exception of one is signified, but in "up to one" the whole generality is contained, through the careful knowledge of the one who looks down from heaven, under a kind of particular and personal number.
52.11CSEL 22:123–124
Quamquam uero eam esse infirmitatem humanae naturae meminerimus, ut ex conparatione diuinae bonitatis bonus nemo sit, sed inconparabilis illa diuinitatis exceptio non interclusit bonitatis officium, ut secundum conparationem humanam inter homines bonus nullus sit. bonitas namque primum perfecta ea est, quae indemutabilis naturae uirtute consistens nescit aliquando aliud esse quam fuerit, nec potest non id esse, quod semper est.. humani uero motus ipsa plerumque, mutatione diuersi sunt, et terrenae legis inperfecta natura fit alia, ex alio instinctu se perturbante demutans: et ad id nos diuersarum adfectionum motus inpellit, dum contumelia irascimur, dum damno mouemur, dum ira accendimur, dum metu perturbamur, dum amore inflectimur, dum odio inpellimur, dum gaudio efferimur, dum dolore stimulamur, dum iudicio dissidemus, dum aetate mutamur. his ergo subditi naturae infirmis motibus aequales esse non possumus, dum et adfectu demutabiles sumus et tempore. et idcirco perfecta bonitas in nullo est, quia eam naturalium perturbationum incentiua demutent. sed tamen cum in bonitatis sumus uel uoluntate uel gestis, non possumus uel tunc non hoc esse, quod sumus. et quamuis inperfecti ad id simus, ne semper id simus, quod tamen sumus in tempore, licet per naturae infirmitatem demutationi bonitatis obnoxiis non adimitur nobis, bonos nos uel tum esse, cum sumus.
We remember that such is the weakness of human nature that, by comparison with divine goodness, no one is good; but that incomparable exception of divinity did not shut off the work of goodness, as if by human comparison no one among men were good. For goodness first and perfect is that which, consisting in the power of an unchangeable nature, does not know being at any time other than it was, and cannot not be what it always is. But human impulses are mostly varied by change itself, and the imperfect nature of the earthly law becomes something else, changing as one impulse after another disturbs it. The movement of different feelings drives us to this: when we are angered by insult, moved by loss, kindled by wrath, disturbed by fear, swayed by love, driven by hatred, carried away by joy, stung by grief, divided in judgment, changed by age. Subject, then, to these weak movements of nature, we cannot be constant, since we are changeable both in feeling and in time. And therefore perfect goodness is in no one, since the incitements of natural disturbances change it. Yet when we are in goodness, whether in will or in deeds, we cannot at that time not be what we are. And although we are imperfect in this, that we are not always what we nevertheless are at a given time, yet, though liable through the weakness of nature to change from goodness, it is not taken from us that we are good at least when we are.
52.12CSEL 22:124–126
Bonus autem solus per naturam indemutabilem suam semper deus non praedurus huius demutationis nostrae arbiter fuit, indulgentiam infirmitati nostrae, qua non semper boni permanemus, ex merito uoluntatis inpertiens, qua bonos nos esse delectat: magisque his, quae uellemus, propitiatus est quam his, quae non possemus. iratus est. namque cum Moysi. fideli utique amico suo, et quem in deum pharaoni constituerat, dixisset: quia non glorificasti me in aquae contradictione, ascende in montem et morere, hunc sibi postea, sepulturae eius loco a nemine cognito, una cum Helia ab apostolis in monte conspectum beati et aeterni regni sui consortem et martyrem reseruauit. et, ne per Aaron et Dauid et Salomonem pluresque alios istiusmodi bonitatis dei exempla percurram, quibus, increpitis demutationum offensis, ob fidei tamen meritum adfuit uenia procliuis, conscius dominus infirmitatis humanae, cum apostolis dixisset: omnes uos scandalum patiemini in nocte hac, et beato Petro non tam ad denuntiationem damnatae demutationis, sed quia per timorem carnis demutabilis homo, id quod negaturus esset admonito et neganti quidem claues tamen regni caelorum non ademit: quia cum per trepidationem obrepsisset negatio, uoluntatis tamen usque ad martyrium confitendi fides firma non deerat. et aliud est nolle, aliud non posse. territus enim Petrus, etsi per carnis sensum responsionis non potuit tenere constantiam, per fidem tamen animi statim fleuit. et cum decussum se ab eo, quod uolebat., agnouit, lacrimarum dolore fidei suae effudit adfectum. et ipsum illud fuit demutationis tempus et fletus, scilicet secundum trepidationis demutationem uoluntatis firmitate potiore. nam mox inconstantiam trepidationis constans fides fleuit, probatissimam deinceps apostolicae constantiae firmitatem martyrii confessione confirmans. haec idcirco in praesenti loco conmemorauimus, ne generaliter dictum existimaremus: non est, qui faciat bonitatem, non est usque ad unum, cum hi tot et tanti placentes deo uiri, etiamsi per naturae. demutationem de proposito fidei aliquantulum discessissent, tamen maximis ac pulcherrimis bonitatis operibus gloriam sint caelestis de se iudicii consecuti.
But God, alone always good through his unchangeable nature, was no harsh judge of this changeableness of ours, granting indulgence to our weakness, by which we do not always remain good, according to the merit of the will by which it delights us to be good; and he was more propitiated by what we wished than angered by what we could not. For when he had said to Moses, certainly his faithful friend and the one he had appointed as a god to Pharaoh, "Because you did not glorify me at the water of contradiction, go up the mountain and die," he afterwards kept him, whose burial place no one knew, to be seen with Elijah by the apostles on the mountain as a sharer and witness of his blessed and eternal kingdom. And, not to run through Aaron, David, Solomon, and many others as examples of such goodness of God, to whom, when the offences of their changes were rebuked, ready pardon was still present because of the merit of their faith: the Lord, aware of human weakness, said to the apostles, "All of you will be offended in me this night," and warned blessed Peter of what he would deny, not so much to announce a condemned change as because man is changeable through fear of the flesh; and he did not take the keys of the kingdom of heaven from him even when he denied. For though the denial had crept in through fear, the faith of a will to confess even to martyrdom was not lacking. And it is one thing not to will, another not to be able. For Peter, terrified, though through the sense of the flesh he could not keep steadfastness in his answer, through the faith of his mind at once wept. And when he recognized that he had been shaken from what he willed, he poured out the feeling of his faith in the grief of tears. And that very time was both one of change and of weeping, the firmness of the will being stronger than the change from fear. For soon steadfast faith wept over the inconstancy of fear, confirming thereafter the most approved firmness of apostolic steadfastness by the confession of martyrdom. We have mentioned these things in the present place so that we might not think it said universally, "There is none who does goodness, not even one," since these many great men pleasing to God, even if through the changeableness of nature they had departed a little from the purpose of faith, nevertheless attained by the greatest and most beautiful works of goodness the glory of heaven's judgment upon them.
52.13CSEL 22:126–127
Atque hanc quidem intellegentiae nostrae rationem ea, quae consecuntur, absoluunt: nonne sciunt omnes, qui operantur iniquitatem, qui comedunt populum meum ut cibum panis? deum non inuocauerunt: ibi trepidauerunt timore, ubi non fuit timor. quoniam dominus dissipauit ossa. hominibus placentium; confusi sunt, quoniam deus spreuit illos. si enim usque ad unum bonitatem nemo facit, quomodo populus dei est, qui ut cibus panis manducatur ab operantibus iniquitatem? generalitas ergo sententiae amota est, cum a dei populo, quem in bonitatis operationibus non ambiguum est permanere, iniquitatem secernuntur operantes. comedunt itaque operarii iniquitatis populum dei ut cibum panis, qui sanctorum iniuriis uiuunt, quos uexatio prophetarum et uastatio ecclesiae et omnis iniquitatis delectat operatio. comedunt quoque etiam illi ut cibum panis populum dei, qui eum obtrectationis morsu et laniatu inuidiae dilacerant, secundum illud apostoli: si autem inuicem mordetis et comeditis, uidete ne consumamini ab inuicem. sed et sunt comedentes populum dei ut cibum panis, quibus, ut idem beatus apostolus ait, deus uenter est, qui ministerium deputant ad negotiationem conlationibus se plebis et muneribus ditando, dum conuiuia sub obtentu religionis sumptuosa sectantur, dum apothecas suas inutili religiosorum obsequio distendunt — cum consuetudo ab apostolis necessariae huius conlationis ad diurnam tantum saeculo renuntiantium aut per. inopiam indigentium alimoniam fuerit instituta; de quibus scriptum est: comedentes domos uiduarum et occasione longa orantes. hi ergo ut cibum panis dei populum comedunt et deum non inuocauerunt. stulti enim in corde dixerunt: non est deus. non inuocant ergo, quem negant. uel certe si qui in ecclesia positi dei plebem obtrectatione, insectatione, sumptu comedunt ut cibum panis, etiamsi dominum inuocare se credunt, audient dictum in euangelio fuisse: scimus enim, quia peccatores deus non audit. hi ergo dominum non inuocauerunt, quia oratio non uerborum sit professio, sed fidei.
And what follows settles this reasoning of our understanding: "Do not all who work iniquity know, who eat up my people like a meal of bread? They have not called upon God; there they trembled with fear where there was no fear. For the Lord has scattered the bones of those who please men; they are confounded, because God has despised them." For if no one, not even one, does goodness, how is there a people of God, which is eaten like a meal of bread by those who work iniquity? The generality of the sentence is therefore removed, since those who work iniquity are separated from the people of God, who undoubtedly remain in works of goodness. So the workers of iniquity eat up the people of God like a meal of bread, those who live on injuries to the saints, whom the harassing of the prophets, the devastation of the church, and every work of iniquity delight. Those too eat up the people of God like a meal of bread who tear it with the bite of detraction and the mangling of envy, according to the apostle's saying: "But if you bite and devour one another, take care that you are not consumed by one another." And there are also those who eat up the people of God like a meal of bread whose god, as the same blessed apostle says, is the belly, who treat their ministry as trade, enriching themselves with the people's contributions and gifts, while under pretext of religion they pursue costly banquets, while they swell their storerooms with the useless service of devout people (although the custom of this necessary contribution was instituted by the apostles only for the daily food of those who renounce the world or of those in need through poverty); of whom it is written: "Devouring the houses of widows and praying at length for a pretext." These, then, eat up God's people like a meal of bread and have not called upon God. For they are fools who said in their heart, "There is no God." They do not call, then, on one whom they deny. Or certainly, if any placed in the church eat up God's people like a meal of bread by detraction, persecution, and expense, even if they think they call on the Lord, they will hear that it was said in the Gospel: "For we know that God does not hear sinners." These, then, have not called upon the Lord, because prayer is a profession not of words but of faith.
52.14CSEL 22:127–128
Sed qui deum non inuocant, et illud impietati suae addunt, ut timeant non timenda: illic enim trepidauerunt., ubi non erat timor, saxa, metalla, robora, ignem, aquam, aethera., reges mortuos atque morituros, uel cetera religionum superstitiosa commenta uenerantes et hoc ipso impio inanium metu contemptuque necessarii timoris ex conparatione condemnandi: cum non tam obliuisci timorem dei impium sit, quam impietate praecellat, timori eius metum inanium praetulisse. docuit autem dominus, solum in nobis metum eorum, quae uere timenda sunt. oportere esse, cum dicit: nolite timere eos, qui possunt corpus occidere, animam autem non possunt occidere; timete autem magis eum, qui potest et animam et corpus perdere in gehennam. impius ergo timor est, cum quae non timenda sunt timentur et quae timenda sunt non. timentur. et plerumque nos tamquam pro debita officii religione pie adulari regibus existimamus, quia in corpus nostrum sit his aliquid potestatis: quibus nihil ultra de nobis licet quam latroni, quam febri, quam incendio, quam naufragio, quam ruinae. his enim casibus corporum pro summa potestate desaeuiunt, et propter breuem dolorem libertatem ecclesiae, spei nostrae fiduciam, confessionem dei addicimus, punitorem perditoremque in igne iudicii et corporis et animae nostrae deum non timentes et aeternis diuinae ultionis poenis momentanea atque abolenda supplicia praeferentes; dum placere nos ipsis et in eorum gratia permanere famulatu impio gloriamur.
But those who do not call upon God add this too to their ungodliness, that they fear what is not to be feared; for "there they trembled where there was no fear," venerating stones, metals, wood, fire, water, the sky, kings dead or about to die, or the other superstitious inventions of religions; and by this very ungodly fear of empty things and contempt of necessary fear they are to be condemned by comparison, since it is not so much ungodly to forget the fear of God as it exceeds in ungodliness to have preferred fear of empty things to fear of him. The Lord taught that there ought to be in us only the fear of what is truly to be feared, when he says: "Do not fear those who can kill the body but cannot kill the soul; fear rather him who can destroy both soul and body in Gehenna." It is ungodly fear, then, when what is not to be feared is feared and what is to be feared is not feared. And often we think we flatter kings piously, as if from due religious duty, because they have some power over our body; yet they are allowed nothing more over us than a robber, than a fever, than a fire, than a shipwreck, than a falling building. For with these misfortunes of bodies they rage at their utmost power; and for the sake of brief pain we surrender the freedom of the church, the confidence of our hope, the confession of God, not fearing God, the punisher and destroyer of both our body and our soul in the fire of judgment, and preferring momentary punishments that will pass away to the eternal penalties of divine vengeance, while we boast of pleasing these very men and remaining in their favour by ungodly servility.
52.15CSEL 22:128–130
Et hoc ipsum decreto grauissimo sententia diuina condemnat. namque ad illud, quod dixerat: nonne sciunt omnes, qui operantur iniquitatem, qui comedunt populum meum ut cibum panis? deum non inuocauerunt: ibi trepidauerunt, ubi non erat timor, id ad summam coepti sermonis adiecit: quoniam deus dissipauit ossa hominibus placentium; confusi sunt; quoniam deus spreuit illos. hi ergo, qui operantur iniquitatem et populum comedunt ut cibum panis et deum non inuocauerunt et in non timendis trepidauerunt, nonne cognoscent, quia ossa eorum, qui hominibus placere uelint, deus dissipauit? timuit huius prophetici dicti sententiam sanctus ille gentium doctor dicens: ego si adhuc hominibus placerem, Christi seruus non essem. inutilis est humanae gratiae et inreligiosa sectatio. nam ex deo magis, quam in contumeliam dei hominibus est placendum, ut per diuina instituta et probitatem fidelis uitae innocentisque placeatur. ceterum placere tantum hominibus uelle deo est displicere. non auocat autem ab hominum gratia deus iustorum mentes et fidelium rationabilem sanctitatem. et audiamus eum per Paulum dicentem: sine offensione Iudaeis et Graecis estote et ecclesiae dei, sicuti et ego omnia omnibus placeo, non quaerens quod meum utile est, sed quod multorum est, ut saluentur. hoc est non hominibus, sed deo placere, cum per id, quod deo placetur, et hominibus sit placendum. ex causa. enim placendi deo causa quoque etiam hominibus probabilis fit placendi. ceterum studium, quod, ut hominibus tantum placeatur. inpenditur, ad id, quod deo placendum est, non refertur, quia tantum eorum causa, quibus placetur, adhibetur. non est autem maius uinculum hominibus placendi quam ut nemo sui causa uelit his placere, quibus placeat; quia quod in profectum propriae utilitatis efficitur, non potest non aliquam interdum offensionem ex causis accedentibus excitare, cum quod alii utile est, alteri saepe fiat incommodum. at uero qui nihil sui causa uelit et omnia in profectum alienae utilitatis exerceat, necesse est ut causam sibi inoffensae placabilitatis adquirat; quia et ex alienis utilitatibus placeat nec offendat ex propriis. et hanc esse causam probabilem placendi sibi cunctis apostolus docuit; quia utilitatis suae neglegens utilitati se dedisset alienae.
And the divine sentence condemns this very thing with a most severe decree. For to what he had said, "Do not all who work iniquity know, who eat up my people like a meal of bread? They have not called upon God; there they trembled where there was no fear," he added this as the sum of the discourse begun: "For God has scattered the bones of those who please men; they are confounded, because God has despised them." Will not these, then, who work iniquity, eat up the people like a meal of bread, have not called upon God, and have trembled at what is not to be feared, recognize that God has scattered the bones of those who wish to please men? That holy teacher of the Gentiles feared the sentence of this prophetic saying, when he said: "If I were still pleasing men, I would not be a servant of Christ." The pursuit of human favour is useless and irreligious. For men are to be pleased from God rather than to God's dishonour, so that one pleases through the divine ordinances and the uprightness of a faithful and innocent life. But to wish only to please men is to displease God. God does not, however, call the minds of the righteous and the rational holiness of the faithful away from the favour of men. Let us hear him saying through Paul: "Be without offence to Jews and Greeks and to the church of God, just as I too please all in all things, not seeking what is useful to me but what is useful to many, that they may be saved." This is to please not men but God, when through pleasing God one must also please men. For from the cause of pleasing God there comes also an approved cause of pleasing men. But the effort spent only to please men is not referred to pleasing God, since it is applied only for the sake of those who are pleased. And there is no greater bond for pleasing men than that no one should wish to please, for his own sake, those he pleases; for what is done for the advance of one's own advantage cannot help sometimes provoking some offence from accompanying causes, since what is useful to one often becomes inconvenient to another. But one who wishes nothing for his own sake and does everything for the advantage of others must acquire a reason for being pleasing without offence, since he pleases through the advantages of others and does not offend through his own. The apostle taught that this is an approved cause of pleasing all, because, neglecting his own advantage, he had given himself to the advantage of others.
52.16CSEL 22:130
Dissipauit ergo ossa deus hominibus placentium. et ossa non haec corporalia dissipari intellegenda sunt, sed quia spes aeternitatis in ossibus significari solet, ex quo dictum est: hoc nunc os de ossibus meis. quod beatus apostolus, quia magnum mysterium est, ad Christum et ad ecclesiam refert. quae ex Adae sui seternitate aeternitatis substantiam mutuatur. quod in domini uulnerato licet corpore confixoque non frangitur. os, inquit, eius non conteretur; quia cum fuerit iniquis ius passionis in carnem, in aeternam tamen diuinitatis et inpassibilem naturam nihil licuit passioni. integram autem et incorruptam spem aeternitatis significari in ossibus etiam illic meminimus, ubi dicitur: custodit deus omnia ossa iustorum, unum ex his non conteretur, quia secundum demonstratam Ezechieli resurrectionem sacramentum eius sub ossium significatione sit reuelatum. ergo ut custodit deus ossa iustorum, ita et hominibus placentium dissipauit, et dissipauit non ita, ut eo, quod essent, carerent, sed ut per contemptum dei tamquam deperdita et abiecta uilescerent.
God, then, has scattered the bones of those who please men. And these bodily bones are not to be understood as being scattered; but since the hope of eternity is customarily signified by bones, it is said: "This now is bone of my bones," which the blessed apostle, because it is a great mystery, refers to Christ and the church, which borrows the substance of eternity from the eternity of its Adam. This bone is not broken in the Lord's body, though wounded and pierced: "Not a bone of him," it says, "shall be broken"; because although the wicked had the right of inflicting suffering on the flesh, suffering had no power over the eternal and impassible nature of the divinity. That the hope of eternity, whole and incorrupt, is signified by bones we remember also where it is said: "God guards all the bones of the righteous; not one of them shall be broken"; because, according to the resurrection shown to Ezekiel, its mystery was revealed under the figure of bones. So, as God guards the bones of the righteous, so he has scattered those of the men-pleasers; and scattered them not so that they would cease to be what they were, but that, through God's contempt, they would become worthless as lost and cast away.
52.17CSEL 22:130–131
Id enim sequitur: confusi sunt, quoniam deus spreuit illos. confunditur quisque et pudore dedecoris sui et conparatione honoris alieni. et hinc illud, quod apostolus significat dicens: omnes quidem resurgimus, sed non omnes demutabimur. sed et propheta et confusionem resurrectionis et honorem discernit, ita dicens: et resurgent alii quidem in uitam, alii in confusionem aeternam. confundentur ergo, quorum ossa dispersa sunt, quos spreuit deus, quos tamquam indignos, ne conformes essent gloriae suae et resurrectionis, abiecit: resurrecturi adeo, ut confundantur, non demutabuntur uero et ex eo confundentur. haec enim resurrectionis statuta condicio est, et idcirco tamquam ex prarterito pro decreti definitione fit sermo, quia id, ut ita maneat, sit statutum.
For this follows: "They are confounded, because God has despised them." Each person is confounded both by shame at his own disgrace and by comparison with another's honour. Hence what the apostle signifies when he says: "We shall all rise, but we shall not all be changed." The prophet too distinguishes the confusion and the honour of the resurrection, saying thus: "And they shall rise, some to life, others to eternal confusion." Those, then, will be confounded whose bones have been scattered, whom God has despised, whom he has cast away as unworthy to be conformed to his glory and resurrection: they will rise so as to be confounded, but they will not be changed, and they will be confounded for that very reason. For this is the appointed condition of the resurrection; and therefore the discourse is in the past tense, as the definition of a decree, because it has been established that it shall remain so.
52.18CSEL 22:131–132
Commemoratis uero humanis et insolentiae et iniquitatis impietatibus, ut is, qui titulo praefertur, intellectus in finem possit intellegi. tali propheta spem beatorum finis ipsius adhortatione confirmat dicens: quis dabit ex Sion salutare Israhel? dum auertit dominus captiuitatem plebis suae, exultabit Iacob et laetabitur Israhel. una enim haec spes reliqua fuit humanae infirmitati et fidei, per quam inter tantas praesentis uitae calamitates aeternorum bonorum exspectatione requiesceret. et idcirco certus huius beatitudinis propheta, tamquam ex uasto humanarum miseriarum proclamat profundo, dicens: quis dabit ex Sion salutare Israhel? namque secundum alium prophetam: ex Sion exiet lex, et uerbum domini ex Hierusalem. hoc uerbum domini caro factum est. haec caro et Sion et Hierusalem est, ciuitas nobis pacis et speculatorium nostrum. hinc salutaris, hinc Iesus. Iesus enim, ut saepe diximus, ipso nomine salutaris est. lex autem ex Sion non fuit salutaris, opere quidem uiuificans, sed non iustificans ex fide.
Having recounted the ungodliness of human insolence and iniquity, so that the "understanding for the end" set in the title may be understood, the prophet confirms the hope of the blessed with this exhortation of the end itself, saying: "Who will give out of Sion the salvation of Israel? When the Lord turns back the captivity of his people, Jacob will exult and Israel will be glad." For this one hope remained to human weakness and faith, through which it might rest amid so many calamities of the present life in the expectation of eternal goods. And therefore the prophet, certain of this blessedness, cries out as from the vast depth of human miseries: "Who will give out of Sion the salvation of Israel?" For according to another prophet: "Out of Sion shall go forth the law, and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem." This word of the Lord became flesh. This flesh is both Sion and Jerusalem, our city of peace and our watchtower. From here comes salvation, from here Jesus. For Jesus, as we have often said, is salvation by his very name. But the law from Sion was not saving, giving life indeed by works but not justifying by faith.
52.19CSEL 22:132
Hic uero exspectatus salutaris et datus est Israhel, sed non carnali illi Israhel. non enim, qui filii carnis, filii dei sunt, sed filii promissionis deputantur in semen. testatur et Iohannes, non esse secundum carnem Abrahae filios. cum et filii uiperarum sunt, et potens est deus Abrahae filios de lapidibus excitare. dominus autem ipse docuit, ex fidei operibus proprietatem successionis existere, nec secundum carnis generationem filiorum originem deputari, cum ait: si filii Abraham essetis, opera Abraham faceretis. sed et Daniel presbyteros condemnans ita dicit: non semen Abraham, sed semen Chanaan et non Iuda. Ezechiel quoque increpitis populi iniquitatibus ait: pater tuus Chananaeus, mater tua Chettaea, radix tua et generatio tua de terra Chanaan. non est ergo Israhel iste ex successione corporea, cui ob infidelitatem origo profanissimi generis deputatur. neque huic data salus est, qui non suscepit oblatam. sed ei, qui auersa captiuitate populus dei factus est.
This awaited salvation was given to Israel, but not to that carnal Israel. For not the children of the flesh are children of God, but the children of the promise are counted as offspring. John too testifies that they are not children of Abraham according to the flesh, since they are also children of vipers, and God is able to raise up children to Abraham from stones. And the Lord himself taught that the right of succession comes from the works of faith, and the origin of children is not reckoned by fleshly generation, when he says: "If you were children of Abraham, you would do the works of Abraham." And Daniel too, condemning the elders, says thus: "Not the seed of Abraham, but the seed of Canaan and not of Judah." Ezekiel too, rebuking the iniquities of the people, says: "Your father was a Canaanite, your mother a Hittite; your root and your generation are from the land of Canaan." This Israel, then, is not of bodily succession, to whom, because of unbelief, the origin of a most profane race is ascribed. Nor was salvation given to this one, who did not receive it when offered, but to the one who became the people of God when captivity was turned back.
52.20CSEL 22:132–133
Captas autem inperitarum gentium mentes et impiissimis uitiis ac religionibus subditas in libertatem fidei et nomen familiae caelestis absoluit. qui enim erant daemonum seruitus, facti sunt dei populus. et quis hic sit captiuitatem auertens de se ipse testatus est. hanc enim non lex, non patriarcha, non propheta, non angelus, non aliqua alia caelestium uel dominatuum uel potestatum uel thronum uel uirtutum uirtus auertit, sed ille, qui accepto libro in synagoga cum ista legisset: spiritus domini super me, propter quod unxit me praedicare captiuis remissionem et caecis uisionem, dimittere confractos in remissionem, praedicare annum domini acceptum, fidem et auctorem consummatae significans prophetiae ait: quia hodie inpleta est prophetia haec in auribus uestris. haec igitur populi dei auersa captiuitas est, cum oculi intellegentiae panduntur, cum praefracta peccatis corda in requiem relaxantur, cum annus domini acceptabilis nuntiatur, quo paenitentiae nostrae deo est accepta confessio, cum nihil praeteritorum reputatur ad crimen, cum noua omnia sunt, noua libertas est, noui filii, et aeterna laetitia est.
He freed the captive minds of ignorant nations, subject to most ungodly vices and religions, into the freedom of faith and the name of the heavenly family. For those who were the slaves of demons became the people of God. And who this is who turns back the captivity he himself testified. For neither the law, nor patriarch, nor prophet, nor angel, nor any other power of heavenly beings, dominions, powers, thrones, or virtues turned it back, but he who, having taken the book in the synagogue and read these words, "The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he has anointed me to preach release to captives and sight to the blind, to set free the broken into release, to preach the acceptable year of the Lord," signifying the faith and the author of the fulfilled prophecy, said: "Today this prophecy has been fulfilled in your ears." This, then, is the captivity of God's people turned back: when the eyes of understanding are opened, when hearts broken by sins are released into rest, when the acceptable year of the Lord is announced, in which the confession of our repentance is accepted by God, when nothing of the past is counted as a crime, when all things are new, there is new freedom, new children, and eternal gladness.
52.21CSEL 22:133–134
Exultabit Iacob et laetabitur Israhel: idem namque ipse patriarcha utrumque nomen sortitus ex merito est. nam, quia manu calcem fratris continuisset in partu, Iacob nuncupatus est, subplantaturus deinceps et emendo primogenita et benedictiones occupando. et interpretationis uirtutem Genesis exposuit, Iacob eum, quia subplantator fratris sit, nuncupatum. per agnitionem autem confessi dei tum, cum se ab eo homine, cuius in lucta dominabatur, benedici poposcit — quia deum, aduersum quem generis sui populus secundum futurae passionis sacramentum in lucta carnis inualuit, fidei oculis conspexisset in corpore — Israhel, quia Israhel deum uidens sit, meruit nominari. et secundum ipsius Genesis prophetiam in Iacob iuniorem populum, qui esset ex gentibus crediturus, significari absolutum est. hic ergo exultabit Iacob et laetabitur Israhel: secundum ecclesiae ordinem hic unus populus duplicis et professionis et honoris; neque enim geminatis sententiis idipsum caelestis sermo significat. sed quia fides prima, qua quis inuocari super se dei nomen precatur, fide anteriorem populum subplantat, cum Iudaeo nec infidelem se optat esse gentilis. hic ergo Iacob est, spe praeoccupatae benedictionis exultans. iam uero ubi baptismo renatus et fide consummatus deum intellegentiae oculis et mente adspexerit, tunc iam laetabitur Israhel, quia iam subplantato seniore deum fide uideat, uisurus ueriore conspectu - secundum illam beatitudinis sponsionem: beati mundi corde. quoniam ipsi deum uidebunt, domini et dei nostri Iesu Christi, qui est benedictus in saecula saeculorum. amen.
"Jacob will exult and Israel will be glad": for the same patriarch received both names by merit. For because he held his brother's heel with his hand at birth, he was called Jacob, being later to supplant him both by buying the birthright and by seizing the blessings. And Genesis explained the force of the interpretation, that he was called Jacob because he was the supplanter of his brother. But through the recognition of God whom he confessed, when he asked to be blessed by that man over whom he prevailed in the wrestling (because, according to the mystery of the future passion, he had seen with the eyes of faith in the body the God against whom the people of his race prevailed in a wrestling of the flesh), he deserved to be named Israel, because Israel is "one who sees God." And according to the prophecy of Genesis itself, it is settled that in Jacob the younger people is signified, which would believe from the Gentiles. Here, then, Jacob will exult and Israel will be glad: according to the order of the church, this one people of a twofold profession and honour; for the heavenly word does not signify the same thing by doubled sentences. But because the first faith, by which someone prays that the name of God be called upon him, supplants by faith the earlier people, when the Gentile wishes not to be an unbeliever with the Jew, this is Jacob, exulting in the hope of the blessing seized beforehand. But when, reborn in baptism and perfected in faith, he has beheld God with the eyes and mind of understanding, then Israel will be glad, because, having supplanted the elder, he now sees God by faith, and will see him with a truer sight, according to that promise of blessedness: "Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God," our Lord and God Jesus Christ, who is blessed for ever and ever. Amen.
Tractates 53
53.1CSEL 22:135
Sanctus et beatus Dauid non ignarus est, ut propheta, euangelicae doctrinae, et in tempore licet legis hanc corporalem agens uitam, tamen, quantum in se est, apostolici mandati praecepta consummat, testimonio de se dei fidem praestans, cum dictum est: inueni uirum secundum cor meum Dauid, qui Iessae est. non enim inimicos suos bello persequitur neque insidiantibus sibi decertando armis resistit, sed exemplo domini, cuius et nomen et lenitatem praefigurabat, proditus orat, periclitans psallit, patiens odia gratulatur; et ideo secundum domini cor repertus est. quia cum domino duodecim milia legionum angelorum possent in tempore passionis adsistere, tamen ad omne officium humilitatis explendum passioni se et infirmitati ipse permisit, orans tantum et dicens: pater commendo in manus tuas spiritum meum. quo exemplo hic idem, per similitudinem passionum futurae eius passionis propheta, non contradicit, non resistit inimicis, malum pro malo ex praecepto euangelico non reddens, sed dominicae mansuetudinis aemulator, cum tribulatur, cum proditur, cum fugatur, dominum, cuius tantum aduersus impios armis utitur, deprecatur.
Holy and blessed David, as a prophet, is not ignorant of the gospel teaching, and though living this bodily life in the time of the law, yet as far as lies in him he fulfils the precepts of the apostolic command, giving proof of God's trust in him by the testimony about him, when it was said: "I have found a man after my heart, David, the son of Jesse." For he does not pursue his enemies with war nor resist those who plot against him by fighting with arms; but after the example of the Lord, whose name and gentleness he prefigured, when betrayed he prays, when in danger he sings psalms, when suffering hatred he gives thanks; and therefore he was found after the Lord's heart. For although twelve legions of angels could have stood by the Lord at the time of his passion, yet to fulfil every duty of humility he gave himself over to suffering and weakness, only praying and saying: "Father, into your hands I commend my spirit." By this example this same David, prophet of his future passion through the likeness of his own sufferings, does not contradict, does not resist his enemies, not returning evil for evil according to the gospel precept, but, as an imitator of the Lord's meekness, when he is afflicted, betrayed, put to flight, he entreats the Lord, whose arms alone he uses against the ungodly.
53.2CSEL 22:135–136
Psalmo autem huic ex historia titulus praescribitur; sed ante historiam, quatenus et quando et in quem ea, quae sub historia dicuntur, a nobis sint intellegenda, monstrantur. est enim primum: in finem intellectus illi Dauid. tum deinde sequitur: cum uenerunt Ziphaei et dixerunt ad Saul: nonne ecce Dauid absconsus est apud nos? ergo hoc, quod a Ziphseis Dauid proditur, in finem est intellegendum. per quod ostenduntur ea, quod in praesens tum erga Dauid agebantur, praeformationem in se futuri temporis continere: cum innocens insectatione uexatur, cum propheta contumeliis inluditur, cum deo placens ad mortem requiritur, cum rex inimico suo, ut dominus Herodi atque Pilato, ab his proditur, cum quibus tutus esse debebat. psalmus ergo intellegentise in finem est et in Dauid illo intellectus, in quo finis est legis. et qui Dauid habet claues, aditum intellegentise tum aperiens, cum. quae de se a Dauid sunt prophetata, consummat.
A title from history is set before this psalm; but before the history, it is shown how far, when, and with reference to whom what is said under the history is to be understood by us. For first there is: "For the end, understanding, to that David." Then follows: "When the Ziphites came and said to Saul: Is not David hidden among us?" So this betrayal of David by the Ziphites is to be understood "for the end." By this it is shown that what was then being done to David in the present contained in itself a prefiguring of future time: when the innocent man is harassed by persecution, when the prophet is mocked with insults, when one pleasing to God is sought for death, when the king is betrayed to his enemy, as the Lord was to Herod and Pilate, by those among whom he ought to have been safe. The psalm, then, is of understanding "for the end," and of understanding in that David in whom is the end of the law. And he who has the key of David opens the entrance to understanding when he fulfils what was prophesied of him by David.
53.3CSEL 22:136–137
Ipsa autem secundum hebraeam proprietatem interpretatio nominis adfert non exiguum nobis ad intellegendum profectum. Ziphsei namque significantur, quae nobiscum sunt oris aspersiones: hae ab Hebraeis Ziphsei nuncupantur. aspersio autem secundum legem emundatio peccatorum erat, per fidem populum sanguinis aspersione purificans, cuius aspersionis hic idem beatus Dauid ita meminit: asperges me hyssopo, et mundabor, sacramentum futurae ex domini sanguine aspersionis fide interim legis sanguine holocaustomatum repensante. sed hic populus, ut populus Ziphaei, ore potius quam fide aspersus et emundationem aspersionis labiis magis quam corde suscipiens, infidelis in Dauid suum et proditor exstitit, quod antea per prophetam dixerat: populus hic labiis me honorat, cor autem eius longe est a me; ad prodendum Dauid ob id pronus, quia cessante fide cordis omnia per oris fraudulentiam legis sacramenta gessisset.
The very interpretation of the name according to the Hebrew proper sense brings us no small advance in understanding. For Ziphites signifies what we call "sprinklings of the mouth"; these the Hebrews call Ziphites. Sprinkling, according to the law, was the cleansing of sins, purifying the people through faith by the sprinkling of blood; this same blessed David mentions this sprinkling thus: "You will sprinkle me with hyssop, and I shall be clean," the faith of the law meanwhile, by the blood of burnt offerings, making up for the mystery of the future sprinkling from the Lord's blood. But this people, as the people of Ziphites, sprinkled with the mouth rather than by faith and receiving the cleansing of sprinkling with the lips rather than the heart, became unfaithful to its David and his betrayer, as he had said before through the prophet: "This people honours me with their lips, but their heart is far from me"; inclined to betray David for this reason, that, faith of the heart having ceased, it had performed all the mysteries of the law through the deceitfulness of the mouth.
53.4CSEL 22:137
Deus, in nomine tuo saluifica me et in uirtute tua iudica me. deus, exaudi orationem meam, auribus percipe uerba oris mei. secundum demonstratam tituli rationem passio Dauid prophetae dei ac domini nostri Iesu Christi passionis exemplum est. et idcirco oratio quoque eius etiam ad intellegentiam orationis eius, qui uerbum caro factum est, temperatur: ut, qui omnia secundum hominem passus est, idem omnia secundum hominem et loquatur; et quorum infirmitates portauit et peccata suscepit, eorum ad deum deprecetur obsequio. proprietates autem uirtutesque uerborum, etiam inuitis licet et cunctantibus nobis, intellegentiae huius exigunt sensum, ut omnia ex persona eius dici non ambigamus in psalmo. ait enim: deus, in nomine tuo saluifica me. in humilitate corporis unigenitus dei filius sub prophetae sui dictis haec precatur, qui et gloriam, quam ante saecula habuerat, reposcebat. saluificari se in dei nomine rogat, in quo est et nuncupatus et natus, ut se in eo corpore, in quo erat natus, idipsum, quod naturae anteriori suae et generi erat proprium, saluum faceret dei nomen.
"God, save me in your name, and judge me in your power. God, hear my prayer, give ear to the words of my mouth." According to the meaning of the title already shown, the suffering of the prophet David is an example of the passion of our God and Lord Jesus Christ. And therefore his prayer too is tempered for the understanding of the prayer of him who, the Word, became flesh, so that he who suffered all things as man might also speak all things as man, and might entreat God out of service for those whose weaknesses he bore and whose sins he took up. The proper senses and forces of the words, even against our will and hesitation, demand the sense of this understanding, so that we do not doubt that everything in the psalm is said in his person. For he says: "God, save me in your name." In the lowliness of the body the only-begotten Son of God prays this under the words of his prophet, he who was also asking back the glory he had had before the ages. He asks to be saved in the name of God, in which he was both named and born, so that the name of God might save, in that body in which he was born, the very thing that was proper to his former nature and kind.
53.5CSEL 22:137–138
Et quia omnis haec ex persona formae seruilis oratio est, cui formae seruili usque ad crucem mortis adsumptae salutem eius nominis, quod dei est, deprecatur, et saluandus ex dei nomine id continuo subiecit: et in uirtute tua iudica me. namque ob meritum humilitatis, quia se exinanisset formam serui accipiens, formam nunc rursum dei consortem in ea, quam adsumpserat, humilitate repetebat, in dei nomen homine ipso, in quo deus nasci oboedierat, saluato. et ut huius nominis, in quo se saluari orabat, honorem non nudae tantum nuncupationis doceret esse, iudicari se in uirtute dei precatur. primum enim ex iudicio est, quod meretur: factus, inquit, oboediens usque ad mortem et mortem crucis. propter quod exaltauit illum deus et donauit illi nomen, quod est super omne nomen: ut ei nomen, quod super omne nomen est, donetur; tum deinde hoc ipsum iudicium sit in uirtute iudicii, quia per uirtutem dei is, qui ex deo homo mortuus fuerat, idem rursus in deum ex homine mortuo resurrexit, secundum illud apostoli: crucifixus ex infirmitate resurrexit ex uirtute et rursum: non enim erubesco euangelium; uirtus enim dei in salutem omni credenti. per iudicii enim uirtutem infirmitas corporalis in dei nomen naturamque saluatur; atque ita ob meritum oboedientiae in salutem nominis dei ex iudicii uirtute prouehitur, ut in eo dei et nomen et uirtus sit. ceterum si ex consuetudine humana sermo iste coepisset, in misericordia potius uel aequitate, quam in uirtute, iudicari propheta se poposcisset. sed uirtutis illic opus fuerat iudicio, ubi dei filio in filium hominis ex partu uirginis nato, rursum ipsi hominis filio per iudicii uirtutem dei filii et nomen redhibendum esset et uirtus.
And since this whole prayer is in the person of the form of a servant, for which form of a servant, assumed even to the death of the cross, he entreats the salvation of that name which is God's, and being to be saved by God's name, he at once added: "and judge me in your power." For by the merit of humility, because he had emptied himself taking the form of a servant, he was now asking again for the form of God as partner in that lowliness he had assumed, the man himself, in whom God had obediently been born, being saved into the name of God. And to teach that the honour of this name, in which he prayed to be saved, was not that of a bare title only, he prays to be judged in the power of God. For first there is what he deserves from judgment: "Having become obedient," it says, "to death, even death on a cross; therefore God exalted him and gave him the name that is above every name": so that the name above every name might be given him; then that this very judgment might be in the power of judgment, because through God's power he who from God had died as man rose again, the same, from dead man into God, according to the apostle's saying, "Crucified out of weakness, he rose out of power," and again: "For I am not ashamed of the gospel, for it is the power of God for salvation to everyone who believes." For through the power of judgment bodily weakness is saved into the name and nature of God; and so, by the merit of obedience, it is advanced by the power of judgment to the salvation of God's name, so that in it there is both the name and the power of God. Otherwise, if this discourse had begun from human custom, the prophet would have asked to be judged in mercy or equity rather than in power. But power was needed for the judgment there, where, the Son of God having been born as son of man from the virgin's childbirth, both the name and the power of the Son of God were to be restored again to that very son of man through the power of judgment.
53.6CSEL 22:138–140
Sequitur dehinc: deus exaudi orationem meam, auribus percipe uerba oris mei. promptum prophetae fuerat dixisse: deus, exaudi me. sed quia ex persona eius loquitur, qui solus sciret orare, idcirco constans postulatio exaudiendae orationis ostenditur. Paulus beatus neminem hominum, qualiter orare oporteat., scire docet dicens: quod enim, quid oremus, qualiter oporteat, nescimus. non est ergo infirmitatis humanae, exaudiri orationem suam postulare: cum doctor gentium, post constitutam licet iam a domino formam orandi, quid et quatenus oret ignoret. sed eius ista fiducia est, qui solus patrem uidet, qui solus patrem scit, qui solus potest orare pernoctans — secundum euangelium enim dominus pernoctauit orans —, qui per speculum uerborum formam ipsam occultissimi sacramenti sub communibus uerbis, dum oraremus, ostendit. et qui orationem suam poposcit audiri, ut peculiare hoc fiduciae suae doceret esse, subiecit: inaurire uerba oris mei. et quisquam hoc humanae fiduciae esse existimabit, ut uerba oris sui uelit audiri? an illa, quibus motus animi nostri et inpetus pronuntiamus, tum cum de ira exardescimus, tum cum de odio obtrectamus, tum cum de dolore querimur, tum cum de adulatione blandimur, tum cum aut pro spe lucri aut de ueritatis pudore mentimur, aut de contumeliae offensione maledicimus? et quis usquam uitae ita emendatae et patientis ad omnia fuit, ut his humanae demutationis uitiis non esset obnoxius? solus hoc potuit cum fiducia uelle, qui peccatum non fecit. in cuius ore dolus non fuit, qui flagellis dorsum praebuit, maxillas ab alapis non deflexit, sputamentorum contumeliam non exprobrauit et in nullo uoluntatem eius, cuius ad haec uoluntati in omnibus uolens oboediebat, offendit.
Then follows: "God, hear my prayer; give ear to the words of my mouth." It would have been easy for the prophet to say, "God, hear me." But because he speaks in the person of him who alone knew how to pray, therefore a confident request that the prayer be heard is shown. Blessed Paul teaches that no man knows how one ought to pray, saying: "For we do not know what we should pray for as we ought." It does not belong to human weakness, then, to ask that one's prayer be heard, since the teacher of the Gentiles, even after the form of prayer had been established by the Lord, does not know what and how far to pray. But this confidence belongs to him who alone sees the Father, who alone knows the Father, who alone can pray all night (for according to the Gospel the Lord spent the night in prayer), who, through the mirror of words, showed under common words the very form of the most hidden mystery, for when we pray. And he who asked that his prayer be heard, to teach that this belonged peculiarly to his confidence, added: "Give ear to the words of my mouth." And will anyone think it belongs to human confidence to wish the words of his mouth to be heard? Those words by which we utter the movements and impulses of our mind, when we burn with anger, when we disparage out of hatred, when we complain out of grief, when we flatter out of adulation, when we lie either for hope of gain or from shame at the truth, or curse out of offence at an insult? And who was ever of so amended a life and so patient in everything as not to be liable to these vices of human changeableness? He alone could wish this with confidence who did no sin, in whose mouth there was no deceit, who gave his back to the scourges, did not turn his cheeks away from blows, did not reproach the insult of spitting, and in nothing offended the will of him whose will he willingly obeyed in all these things.
53.7CSEL 22:140
Causam deinde, cur uerba sua audiri oret, adiecit: quoniam alieni insurrexerunt aduersus me et fortes quaesierunt animam meam, non proposuerunt deum in conspectum suum. unigenitus dei filius, dei uerbum et deus uerbum — cum utique omnia, quae pater posset, omnia ea et ipse posset, sicuti ait: quaecumque enim pater facit, eadem et filius facit similiter, et in indiscreto deitatis naturaeque nomine indiscreta quoque esset et uirtus —, ut absolutissimum nobis humanae humilitatis esset exemplum, omnia, quae hominum sunt, et orauit et passus est. et ex communi nostra infirmitate salutem sibi est deprecatus a patre, ut natiuitatem nostram cum ipsis infirmitatis nostrae inisse intellegeretur officiis. hinc illud est, quod esuriuit, sitiuit, dormiuit, lassatus fuit, impiorum coetus fugit, maestus fuit et fleuit et passus et mortuus est. et ut his omnibus non natura, sed ex adsumptione subiectus esse posset intellegi, perfunctus his omnibus resurrexit. omnis ergo eius in psalmis ex naturae nostrae affectu querella est. nec mirum, si ita nos intellegimus dicta psalmorum, cum ipse dominus secundum euangelicam fidem passionis suae sacramenta scripta esse fuerit testatus in psalmis.
Then he added the reason why he prays that his words be heard: "For strangers have risen up against me, and the strong have sought my soul; they have not set God before their sight." The only-begotten Son of God, the Word of God and God the Word (though he could certainly do all that the Father could, as he says, "For whatever the Father does, the Son does likewise," and in the undivided name of deity and nature the power too was undivided), in order to give us a most complete example of human humility, both prayed and suffered all that belongs to men. And out of our common weakness he entreated salvation for himself from the Father, so that he might be understood to have entered our birth with the very duties of our weakness. Hence it is that he hungered, thirsted, slept, was weary, fled the gatherings of the ungodly, was sorrowful and wept, suffered and died. And so that he might be understood to have been subject to all these not by nature but by assumption, having gone through them all he rose again. All his complaint in the psalms, then, comes from the feeling of our nature. Nor is it surprising if we understand the sayings of the psalms so, since the Lord himself, according to the gospel faith, testified that the mysteries of his passion were written in the psalms.
53.8CSEL 22:140–141
Alieni igitur super eum insurrexerunt. non enim iam filii Abrahae sunt, neque filii dei: sed natio uiperarum, sed serui peccati, sed semen Chanaan patre Amorraeo, matre Chethaea et de diabolo patre filii diabolicae uoluntatis. quaerunt quoque et animam suam fortes: cum Herodes principes sacerdotum, ubi nasci habebat Christus, interrogat, cum omnis synagoga aduersum eum testis falsa coniurat. sed animam hanc humanae naturae et infirmitatis esse existimantes non proposuerunt. deum ante conspectum suum; quia deus ex eo, quod deus manebat, usque ad originem nascendi se hominis humiliasset, id est, ut hominis filius esset, qui erat antea dei filius. non enim alius filius dei, quam qui filius hominis; et filius hominis non ex parte, sed natus, forma enim se dei ex eo, quod erat, ad id, quod non erat, id est, ut nasci posset in animam suam corpusque, euacuante; et idcirco et filius dei et filius hominis, idcirco et deus et homo, id est dei filius habitu humanae originis natus est, usque ad naturam scilicet hominis nascendi. qui totus ex anima et carne. formabilis est, dei se humiliante substantia. ob quod cum insurgunt aduersum eum alieni. cum potentes animam suam exquirunt, quae frequenter in euangeliis tristis et maesta est, deum ante conspectum suum non proposuerunt, quia deus dei filius, ante saecula manens, humanae naturae habitu, id est nostri corporis atque animae homo ex partu uirginis natus esset: per operum magnificentiam non intellegentes, quia hominis filius, cuius animam quaerebant, ad id, quod homo esse coeperat, ex dei filio, quod semper manserat, extitisset.
Strangers, then, rose up against him. For they are no longer children of Abraham, nor children of God, but a brood of vipers, slaves of sin, the seed of Canaan with an Amorite father and a Hittite mother, and children of a devilish will from the devil as father. The strong also seek his soul: when Herod asks the chief priests where the Christ was to be born, when the whole synagogue conspires against him as false witness. But thinking this soul to be of human nature and weakness, they did not set God before their sight; because God, from being God, while remaining so, had humbled himself even to the origin of birth as man, that is, so that he who was before Son of God should be son of man. For the Son of God is no other than the son of man; and son of man not in part, but born, for the form of God emptied itself from what it was to what it was not, that is, so as to be able to be born into its own soul and body; and therefore both Son of God and son of man, therefore both God and man, that is, the Son of God was born in the condition of human origin, even to the nature of being born as man; he who is wholly formable from soul and flesh, the substance of God humbling itself. For this reason, when strangers rise against him, when the powerful seek his soul, which in the Gospels is often sad and sorrowful, they did not set God before their sight, because God the Son of God, abiding before the ages, had been born of the virgin's childbirth as man in the condition of human nature, that is, of our body and soul; not understanding through the magnificence of his works that the son of man whose soul they sought had come forth, as to what he had begun to be as man, from the Son of God, which he had always remained.
53.9CSEL 22:141–142
Interuentu diapsalmi non dicentis, sed cui dicebatur, demutata persona est. nunc enim generalis sermo est prophetiae. nam post eam orationem, quae ad deum fuerat, ut fiducia orantis posset intellegi in eo ipso precationis tempore quod poposcerat inpetrantis, continuo subiecit: ecce enim deus adiuuat me et dominus susceptor est animae meae. conuertit mala inimicis meis. effectus proprios propriis reddidit postulatis, docens non neglegentem orationis nostrae deum esse, neque inrationabilem praestationem misericordiae suae existimandam, cum nos secundum quod precaremur audiret. namque ad id quod ait: quoniam alieni insurrexerunt super me, proprium illud est: deus adiuuat me; ad id autem: et fortes quaesierunt animam meam, in eo exauditae orationis peculiaris effectus est. quod ait: et dominus susceptor est animae meae; ad id uero quod ait: et non proposuerunt deum ante conspectum suum, hoc conpetenter adiecit: conuertit mala inimicis meis. deus ergo et aduersus insurgentes adiuuat et quaesitam a fortibus animam sancti sui suscipit et non propositus ante oculos neque ab impiis cogitatus in inimicos mala ipsa conuertit: ut, dum deum non cogitant iusti animam quaerendo et aduersum eum insurgendo, adiuto eo atque suscepto, eum, quem inter iniquitatum opera non cogitabant, ultorem malitiae ex malitiae ipsius retributione sentirent.
By the intervention of the diapsalma, the person changed is not the speaker's but the one addressed. For now the discourse of prophecy is general. For after the prayer addressed to God, so that the confidence of the one praying might be understood as obtaining what he had asked in the very time of his entreaty, he at once added: "For behold, God helps me, and the Lord is the upholder of my soul. He has turned back evils on my enemies." He gave proper effects to proper requests, teaching that God is not careless of our prayer and that the granting of his mercy is not to be thought irrational, since he heard us according to what we prayed. For to the words "for strangers have risen up against me" belongs "God helps me"; to "and the strong have sought my soul" belongs the particular effect of the prayer heard, "and the Lord is the upholder of my soul"; and to "and they have not set God before their sight" he fittingly added: "He has turned back evils on my enemies." God, then, both helps against those who rise up and takes up the soul of his holy one sought by the strong, and, not set before their eyes nor thought of by the ungodly, turns the very evils back upon the enemies; so that, while they do not think of God in seeking the soul of the righteous and rising against him, when he has been helped and taken up, they may feel as avenger of their wickedness, through the recompense of that wickedness, him of whom they did not think amid the works of iniquity.
53.10CSEL 22:142–143
Habeat itaque hanc innocens religio fiduciam, ut inter humanas insectationes et animae pericula adiutorem sibi deum esse non ambigat et, si quando iniustae mortis uis adferatur, excedentem habitaculo corporis animam sciat in dei susceptione requiescere: habeat ultionis quoque certissimam securitatem, cum mala omnia in eos, qui inferant, reuertantur. non potest iniquitatis argui deus, nec perfectae bonitati malignae uoluntatis instinctus ac motus admixtus est mala enim non maliuolus excitat, sed ultor retorquet; neque ea ex malitia sua adfert, sed in merita nostra conuertit. statuta enim in omnes sunt ad ultionum ministeria mala ista cum lege uiuendi, iusti id iudicii seuera aequitate moderante. sed haec auersa a iustis sunt lege iustitiae et conuertuntur in iniquos aequitate iudicii. utrumque iustum, ut et iustis ad metum prompta sint nec admixta, quia iusti sunt; et iniustis ad poenam sint conuertenda, quia meriti sunt: nec iustis admixta, cum prompta sint, nec iniustis defutura, quia prompta sunt.
Let innocent devotion, then, have this confidence: that amid human persecutions and dangers to the soul it does not doubt that God is its helper, and if at some time the force of an unjust death is brought upon it, it knows that the soul leaving the dwelling of the body rests in God's keeping; let it also have the most certain security of vengeance, since all evils return upon those who inflict them. God cannot be charged with iniquity, nor is the impulse and movement of a malicious will mixed with perfect goodness. For he does not stir up evils out of malice, but twists them back as avenger; nor does he bring them from his own malice, but turns them upon our merits. For these evils have been appointed against all for the ministries of vengeance together with the law of living, the stern equity of just judgment governing it. But these are turned away from the righteous by the law of righteousness and are turned upon the wicked by the equity of judgment. Both are just: that they are ready for the righteous as a cause of fear but not mixed with them, because they are righteous; and that they are to be turned upon the unrighteous for punishment, because they have deserved it: not mixed with the righteous, though ready, nor absent from the unrighteous, because they are ready.
53.11CSEL 22:143–144
Dehinc rursum fit ad personam dei, ad quem primum deprecatio erat coepta, conuersio: in ueritate tua disperde illos. ueritas mendacium confutat et perimitur falsitas ueritate. omnem autem superiorem orationem esse eius hominis, in quo filius dei est natus, docuimus, etiam hoc quoque nunc a deo patre deprecantis, ut inimicos suos in ueritate disperdat. et quae sit ueritas, non ambigitur; nempe ille ipse, qui dixit: ego sum uita, uia, ueritas. disperduntur ergo in ueritate inimici, cum falsis testibus damnationem Christo conparantes resurrexisse eum a mortuis audiunt et in dei ueritate gloriam suam resumpsisse cognoscunt, nam postea ob poenam dei in crucem acti fame et bello absumpti ac perditi sunt: uitae auctorem morte damnantes neque dei in eo ueritatem per operum magnificentiam cogitantes. hos igitur disperdit dei ueritas, cum ad resumendam gloriae maiestatem paternae resurgens absolutae in se diuinitatis probauerit ueritatem.
Then the address turns again to the person of God, to whom the entreaty was first begun: "In your truth destroy them." Truth refutes the lie, and falsehood is destroyed by truth. We have taught that all the preceding prayer belongs to the man in whom the Son of God was born, who now also entreats this from God the Father, that he destroy his enemies in truth. And what the truth is is not in doubt: surely he himself who said, "I am the life, the way, the truth." The enemies are destroyed in truth, then, when, having procured Christ's condemnation by false witnesses, they hear that he has risen from the dead and know that he has resumed his glory in the truth of God; for afterwards, as punishment from God, they were driven onto crosses, consumed and destroyed by famine and war, having condemned the author of life to death and not considered the truth of God in him through the magnificence of his works. These, then, the truth of God destroys, when, rising to resume the majesty of the Father's glory, he proved in himself the truth of complete divinity.
53.12CSEL 22:144–145
Quod autem et in crucem actum unigenitum dei filium et morte damnatum eum, qui natiuitate, quae sibi ex aeterno patre est naturalis, aeternus sit, frequenter, immo semper, praedicamus: non ex naturae necessitate potius, quam ex sacramento humanae salutis, passioni fuisse subditus intellegendus est; et uoluisse se magis passioni subici, quam coactum. et quamquam passio illa non fuerit condicionis et generis, quia incommutabilem dei naturam nulla uis iniuriosae perturbationis offenderet, tamen suscepta uoluntarie est, officio quidem ipsa satisfactura poenali, non tamen poenae sensu laesura patientem: non quod illa laedendi non habuerit pro ipsa passionis qualitate naturam, sed quod dolorem diuinitatis natura non sentit. passus ergo est deus, quia se subiecit uoluntarius passioni; sed suscipiens naturales ingruentium in se passionum, quibus dolorem patientibus necesse est eas inferri, uirtutes, ipse tamen a naturae suae uirtute non excidit, ut doleret.
As for our frequent, indeed constant, proclamation that the only-begotten Son of God was driven to the cross and condemned to death, he who is eternal by the birth that is natural to him from the eternal Father: he is to be understood to have been subjected to suffering not from necessity of nature but from the mystery of human salvation, and to have willed to be subjected to suffering rather than to have been compelled. And although that suffering was not of his condition and kind, since no force of injurious disturbance could harm the unchangeable nature of God, yet it was undertaken voluntarily, to satisfy indeed the penal office, yet not to wound the sufferer with the sense of punishment: not that it lacked the nature of wounding according to the very quality of the suffering, but that the nature of divinity does not feel pain. God suffered, then, because he subjected himself voluntarily to suffering; but taking upon himself the natural forces of the sufferings rushing upon him, by which pain must be inflicted on those who suffer, he himself did not fall from the power of his nature so as to feel pain.
53.13CSEL 22:145
Sequitur enim: uoluntarie sacrificabo tibi. legis sacrificia, quae in holocaustomatis et oblationibus hircorum atque taurorum sunt, non habent in se uoluntatis professionem, quia maledicti sententia legem sit decreta uiolantibus. quisquis enim a sacrificio destitisset, ipse obnoxium se efficiebat esse maledicto. necesse ergo erat effici, quod fiebat, quia sacrificii neglegentiam maledicti non admittebat adiectio. a quo maledicto nos dominus noster Iesus Christus exemit, apostolo dicente: Christus nos exemit de maledicto legis factus pro nobis ipse maledictum, quia scriptum est: maledictus omnis, qui pendet in ligno. maledictorum se ergo obtulit morti, ut maledictum legis dissolueret, hostiam se ipse deo patri uoluntarie offerendo: ut per hostiam uoluntariam maledictum, quod ob hostiae necessariae et intermissae reatum erat additum, solueretur. cuius sacrificii alio loco meminit in psalmis: hostiam et oblationem noluisti, perficis autem mihi corpus; deo patri legis sacrificia respuenti hostiam placentem suscepti corporis offerendo. cuius oblationis beatus apostolus ita meminit: hoc enim fecit semel se ipsum offerens hostiam deo, omnem humani generis salutem oblatione sanctae huius et perfectae hostiae redempturus.
For there follows: "I will sacrifice to you voluntarily." The sacrifices of the law, consisting of burnt offerings and the offerings of goats and bulls, do not have in themselves a profession of will, since the sentence of the curse had been decreed against those who violated the law. For whoever ceased from sacrifice made himself liable to the curse. It was necessary, then, that what was done should be done, since the addition of the curse did not allow neglect of sacrifice. From this curse our Lord Jesus Christ redeemed us, as the apostle says: "Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law, becoming a curse for us himself, because it is written: Cursed is everyone who hangs on a tree." He offered himself, then, to the death of the cursed, to dissolve the curse of the law by offering himself voluntarily as a sacrifice to God the Father, so that through a voluntary sacrifice the curse, which had been added because of the guilt of a necessary sacrifice left undone, might be dissolved. He mentions this sacrifice in another place in the psalms: "Sacrifice and offering you did not want, but you perfect a body for me," offering to God the Father, who rejected the sacrifices of the law, the pleasing sacrifice of the body he had taken. The blessed apostle mentions this offering thus: "For this he did once, offering himself as a sacrifice to God," to redeem the whole salvation of the human race by the offering of this holy and perfect sacrifice.
53.14CSEL 22:145–147
Ob quae omnia ita gesta laudem deo patri refert: confitebor nomini tuo, domine, quoniam bonum est, quoniam ex omni tribulatione eripuisti me. reddidit singulis propositionibus proprias absolutiones. nam in exordio dixerat: deus, in nomine tuo saluifica me; post precum uero satisfactionem congruam gratulationis esse oportuit professionem, ut eius nomini confiteretur, in cuius nomine saluari sese fuerat deprecatus, et, quia auxilium contra alienos insurgentes in se poposcerat, idipsum adeptum se fuisse professi per hoc gaudii exsultatione memoraret: quia ex omni tribulatione eripuisti me. ad id uero, quod, cum fortes quaesierunt animam eius. deum non proposuerunt in conspectu suo, praeclare indemutabilis diuinitatis suae docuit aeternitatem in eo, quod dictum est: et super inimicos meos respexit oculus meus. morte enim non interceptus est unigenitus dei filius. ad explendam quidem hominis naturam etiam morti se, id est discessioni se tamquam animae corporisque subiecit et ad infernas sedes, id quod homini debitum uidetur esse, penetrauit: sed manet resurgens et inimicos suos inmortali oculo despicit, glorificatus in deum et ex hominis filio in dei filium, ex quo etiam hominis filius esse coeperat, per resurrectionis gloriam renatus. inimicos suos despicit, quibus dixerat: soluite templum hoc. et post triduum aedificabo illud. aedificato igitur hoc corporis sui templo eos, qui quaesierant animam suam, ex edito uidet et ultra humanae mortis legem auctores mortis suae sublimis ipse despectat, mortem perpetiens, sed mori nesciens, deus homo dominus noster Iesus Christus. qui est benedictus in saecula saeculorum. amen.
For all these things so done he renders praise to God the Father: "I will confess to your name, Lord, for it is good, for you have rescued me from every tribulation." He gave to each proposition its proper resolution. For at the beginning he had said, "God, save me in your name"; and after the satisfaction of his prayers there had to be a fitting profession of thanksgiving, so that he might confess to the name of him in whose name he had prayed to be saved; and since he had asked for help against the strangers rising against him, he records with exultant joy, by professing it, that he had obtained it: "for you have rescued me from every tribulation." And as to the fact that, when the strong sought his soul, they did not set God before their sight, he excellently taught the eternity of his unchangeable divinity in the words: "And my eye has looked down upon my enemies." For the only-begotten Son of God was not cut off by death. To fulfil the nature of man he subjected himself even to death, that is, to the separation, as it were, of soul and body, and went down to the infernal abodes, which seems to be what is due to man; but rising he remains and looks down on his enemies with an immortal eye, glorified into God and reborn through the glory of the resurrection from son of man into the Son of God, from whom he had also begun to be son of man. He looks down on his enemies, to whom he had said: "Destroy this temple, and after three days I will build it." Having built this temple of his body, then, he sees from on high those who had sought his soul, and, lifted beyond the law of human death, looks down on the authors of his death, suffering death but not knowing how to die, God and man, our Lord Jesus Christ, who is blessed for ever and ever. Amen.
Tractates 54
54.1CSEL 22:147
Superscriptio psalmi sine historia est; tantum: in finem in hymnis intellectus est. hymnos aliqui translatores nostri carmina nuncupauerunt; plerique autem hymnos ex ipsa grsecitatis usurpatione posuerunt. de nomine nihil differt, dummodo res una esse, quae uel in hymnis uel in carminibus significabitur, intellegatur. hoc ergo de psalmo sentiendum est, quod quae hymno eius uel carmine continentur, in finem intellegenda sunt: omni intellectu scilicet nostro ad dominum nostrum Iesum Christum, quem apostolus finem legis docuit esse, referendo.
The heading of the psalm has no history; it is only: "For the end, among the hymns, understanding." Some of our translators have called the hymns "songs"; but most have put "hymns," from the very usage of the Greek. The name makes no difference, provided it is understood that the thing signified, whether by "hymns" or by "songs," is one. This, then, is to be held about the psalm: what is contained in its hymn or song is to be understood "for the end," all our understanding being referred to our Lord Jesus Christ, whom the apostle taught to be the end of the law.
54.2CSEL 22:147–148
Frequenter autem admonuimus, eam in psalmorum cognitione sensus nostri temperandam esse rationem, ut eum, de quo et per quem omnis prophetia est, ex dei filio hominis filium natum meminerimus, dei naturam omnibus ante saeculis manentem in naturam hominis esse ex partu uirginis genitam, ita ut naturae posterioris adiectio nullam defectionem naturae anterioris adferret, neque qui etiam homo esse coeperat, id, quod ante hominem manebat, deus scilicet, esse desineret. hic ergo adsumens carnis nostrae fragilitatem et manens suus atque noster ita agit, orat, profitetur, exspectat omnia illa, quae nostra sunt, ut in his admisceat etiam illa, quae sua sunt. loquaturque interdum ex persona hominis, quia homo et natus et passus et mortuus est, interdum autem omnis ei secundum deum sermo sit, quia ex deo homo et ex dei filio hominis filius exstitisset: naturae scilicet eius confidentiam non oblitus in uerbis, qua in adsumptione licet hominis non carebat. et ita ex nobis atque ex infirmitate nostra humani sermonis consuetudine usuque loquens, ut ex se atque ex uirtute sua, quae deo sunt propria et digna, loqueretur, ut in praesenti psalmo cognosci potest, qui ita coeptus est.
We have often warned that in knowing the psalms the reasoning of our sense must be so tempered that we remember that he of whom and through whom all prophecy is was born son of man from the Son of God: the nature of God, abiding before all ages, was begotten into the nature of man by the virgin's childbirth, in such a way that the addition of the later nature brought no failing of the former nature, nor did he who also began to be man cease to be what he remained before man, namely God. This one, then, taking the frailty of our flesh and remaining both his own and ours, acts, prays, professes, and awaits all those things that are ours in such a way as to mix in them also those that are his own. And he speaks sometimes in the person of man, because as man he was born, suffered, and died; but sometimes all his discourse is according to God, because from God he had come forth man and from the Son of God son of man: not forgetting in his words the confidence of his nature, which he did not lack even in the assumption of man. And so, speaking from us and from our weakness with the custom and usage of human speech, he spoke from himself and from his own power what is proper and worthy to God; as can be recognized in the present psalm, which begins thus.
54.3CSEL 22:148–149
Inaurire deus orationem meam et ne despexeris deprecationem meam: intende mihi et exaudi. me. contristatus sum in exercitatione mea et conturbatus sum a uoce inimici et a tribulatione peccatoris: quoniam declinauerunt in me iniquitatem et in ira molesti erant mihi. cor meum conturbatum est in me, et formido mortis cecidit super me. timor et tremor intrauit in me et contexit me tenebra. et dixi: quis dabit mihi pinnas sicut columbae? et uolabo et requiescam. ecce elongaui fugiens et mansi in solitudine. in exordio psalmi etsi humilitatis uoce usus sit, cum ait: inaurire deus orationem meam, non tamen sine aliqua propria conscientiae altioris fiducia intellegitur haec locutus. non enim cuiuscumque est innocentiae id postulare, ut orationem suam deus inauriat. promptae namque semper precationi hominum dei aures sunt: quia, qui naturam audiendi humano generi inpertit, ipse extra auditus non potest esse naturam et, qui ubique hunc in nobis sensum auditionis operatur, non potest non ubique in ipso esse, quod praestat. deus itaque ubique et semper audit; sed non omnium meriti est, ut quod audit et inauriat: auditum quidem eius orantis uoce penetrante, sed dignationem eorum, qua audiantur, inauriendi sola orationis innocentia promerente.
"Give ear, God, to my prayer, and do not despise my supplication; attend to me and hear me. I was saddened in my exercise and troubled by the voice of the enemy and by the affliction of the sinner; for they turned iniquity upon me and in anger were troublesome to me. My heart was troubled within me, and the dread of death fell upon me. Fear and trembling came into me, and darkness covered me. And I said: Who will give me wings like a dove? And I will fly and be at rest. Behold, I have gone far off in flight and remained in the solitude." At the opening of the psalm, although he used the voice of humility when he said, "Give ear, God, to my prayer," yet he is understood to have said this not without some confidence proper to a loftier conscience. For it does not belong to every kind of innocence to ask that God give ear to one's prayer. For God's ears are always ready for the prayer of men, because he who imparted the nature of hearing to the human race cannot himself be outside the nature of hearing, and he who everywhere works this sense of hearing in us cannot fail to have everywhere in himself what he provides. God, then, hears everywhere and always; but it is not the merit of all that he should give ear to what he hears: the voice of the one praying reaches his hearing, but only the innocence of the prayer merits the favour of his giving ear, by which they are heard.
54.4CSEL 22:149–150
Triplex autem in exordio ratio precationis est edita. prima enim ea est, ut inauriatur oratio. sequens est, ne despiciatur deprecatio. tertia est, ut intendat sibi seque exaudiat. et necesse est discretam esse uniuscuiusque generis naturam, ut non idem sit inaurire et non despicere, rursumque differat ab utroque intendere et exaudire. et quia de inaurienda oratione quid intellegi posset, ostendimus, quid illud sit: ne despexeris deprecationem meam, tractandum est. despiciuntur orationes leues, dissidentes, inutiles, saeculi curis anxiae, rerum corporalium desideriis implicatae, bonorum operum fructibus infecundae. hae igitur despicabiles sunt orationes, dei dignatione non dignae, de quibus per Esaiam prophetam ait: et cum extenderitis manus uestras ad me, auertam oculos meos a uobis. et causam despiciendae orationis continuo subiecit dicens: manus uestrae sanguine plenae sunt. ubi ergo operatio iniquitatis extabit, illic despicitur oratio deprecantis. at uero tum in eum, qui sperat, intenditur, cum tacitae spei fides piae conscientiae religione cohibetur. et est nobis hoc absolutissimum uniuscuiusque proprietatis exemplum. inauriuit dominus uerba Chananaeae saepe clamantis; despexit orationem adulescentis illius, qui ab seternitatis largitore diuisionem patrimonii postulabat; intendit autem in eam feminam, quae fidei silentio salutem sibi etiam a uestis fimbria expetebat.
A threefold reason of prayer is set out at the opening. The first is that the prayer be given ear; the next, that the supplication not be despised; the third, that he attend to him and hear him. And the nature of each kind must be distinct, so that giving ear is not the same as not despising, and attending and hearing differ again from both. Since we have shown what can be understood about giving ear to prayer, we must treat what "do not despise my supplication" means. Prayers are despised that are light, divided, useless, anxious with the cares of the world, entangled in desires for bodily things, barren of the fruits of good works. These, then, are despicable prayers, not worthy of God's favour, of which he says through the prophet Isaiah: "And when you stretch out your hands to me, I will turn my eyes from you." And he at once added the reason for despising the prayer: "Your hands are full of blood." Where, then, the work of iniquity appears, there the prayer of the suppliant is despised. But he attends to the one who hopes when the faith of silent hope is held in by the devotion of a godly conscience. And we have a most complete example of each property. The Lord gave ear to the words of the Canaanite woman crying out often; he despised the prayer of that young man who asked the giver of eternity for a division of his inheritance; but he attended to that woman who in the silence of faith sought health for herself even from the fringe of his garment.
54.5CSEL 22:150–151
His ergo totius precationis suae generibus distinctis nunc causam ipsam exposuit deprecandi: quia in exercitatione sua conturbaretur a uoce inimici et a tribulatione peccatoris. et quidem exercitatio numquam nisi ad res utiles salutaresque suscipitur; quas quia in sancto quoque impii ferre non possunt, omnibus eum iniuriis adficere et usque ad formidinem mortis defatigare contendunt. sed haec in domino Iesu Christo exercitatio nostrae salutis operatio est, quam diuersarum sanationum, dehinc passionis ipsius exercitatio prouehebat. in hoc quoque se mundo consortio nostrae infirmitatis exercens — quam exercitationem egressu suo Isaac in campum praefigurauit, cum inuectae camelo Rebeccae, tamquam sponsae ex gentibus exercens se in hoc mundo Christus, occurrit —, a uoce inimici etiam turbatur, cum Samaritanus, cum daemonium habens dicitur, cum quia se a cruce non eruat, negatur esse ceteris salus. declinantes in eum iniquitatem falsorum testimoniorum et sententiae mortis in ira quoque molesti sunt ei, dum flagellis, dum colaphis, dum alapis desaeuiunt.
Having distinguished these kinds of his whole prayer, he now set out the very reason for praying: that in his exercise he was troubled by the voice of the enemy and by the affliction of the sinner. Exercise is never undertaken except for useful and saving things; and because the ungodly cannot bear these even in a holy man, they strive to afflict him with every injury and wear him out even to the dread of death. But in the Lord Jesus Christ this exercise is the working of our salvation, which the exercise of various healings, and then of the passion itself, carried forward. Exercising himself also in this world in sharing our weakness (an exercise which Isaac prefigured by going out into the field, when he went to meet Rebecca riding on a camel, as Christ, exercising himself in this world, went to meet the bride from the Gentiles), he is also troubled by the voice of the enemy, when he is called a Samaritan, when he is said to have a demon, when it is denied that he is salvation to others because he does not rescue himself from the cross. Turning upon him the iniquity of false testimonies and the sentence of death, they are also troublesome to him in anger, while they rage with scourges, with fists, and with blows.
54.6CSEL 22:151
Sed inter haec, habens potestatem duodecim milia legionum caelestium euocare, non ad iram commouetur neque ad ultionem exacerbatur. sequitur enim: cor meum conturbatum est in me. pati omnia in se ipse constituit. dummodo humanae salutis sacramenta perficeret. difficillimum autem hominis infirmitati est, intra se ipsum perturbationes mentis commotionesque cohibere, ut non etiam usque ad ipsam uultus demutationem, tacito licet motu, significatio anxietatis uel indignationis erumpat. uerum unigenito deo, quamuis infirmitas nostra suscepta sit, tamen diuinitatis suae non est abolita natura, ut non his omnibus, quae infirma sunt, salua maiestatis suae dignitate perfunctus sit, dum uniuersa, quae mortis nostrae sunt ac timoris, ita pertulit, ut in eum inciderent haec potius quam inessent. dum infirmitas nostra magis est, quam naturalis in deo est. denique idipsum sequens sermo conexuit, cum dixit: et formido mortis cecidit super me. timor et tremor uenit super me et contexerunt me tenebrae. et haec quidem in eum omnia, quae nostrae necessitatis sunt, inruerunt; sed ab eo naturae suae uirtute suscepta sunt, dum mortem nostram, potens non mori, etiam timore in se mortis ingruente non renuit.
But amid these, having the power to summon twelve legions of heavenly beings, he is not moved to anger nor provoked to vengeance. For there follows: "My heart was troubled within me." He resolved to suffer everything within himself, provided he accomplished the mysteries of human salvation. It is most difficult for human weakness to hold in disturbances and agitations of mind within itself, so that some sign of anxiety or indignation does not break out, though with a silent movement, even to a change of the face. But in the only-begotten God, although our weakness was taken up, the nature of his divinity was not abolished, so that he did not go through all these weak things with the dignity of his majesty intact, while he bore all things belonging to our death and fear in such a way that they fell upon him rather than were in him, since the weakness is ours rather than natural in God. Indeed, the following words joined this very thing, when he said: "And the dread of death fell upon me. Fear and trembling came upon me, and darkness covered me." All these things, which belong to our necessity, rushed upon him; but they were taken up by him by the power of his nature, since, able not to die, he did not refuse our death even when the fear of death was rushing upon him.
54.7CSEL 22:151–152
Et cum haec eadem, tamquam in hominem, imbecillitati eius dominatura cecidissent, tamen, ut non subiectum se his, quae ingruerent, edoceret, subiecit: et dixi: quis dabit mihi pinnas sicut columb»? et uolabo et requiescam. non infirmus est, cui ad euolandum de contegentibus se tenebris metuque mortis pinnae non aliunde sumendae sunt. cum enim dicit: quis dabit mihi?, non poscentis ab aliquo. sed non aliunde sperantis est. euolare autem ut columba festinat, id est in spiritalem redire naturam. nam et in columbae specie spiritus in eum uolando requieuit habitatione aliquando in eo homine, qui tum de Iordanis aquis ascendebat, inuenta. et haec quidem precationis est causa, quia infirmitate corporis adgrauatus hoc, quod nobis est mortale, susceperat, ut caro factus in spiritum euolaret. et harum quidem pinnarum suarum in psalmo alio ita meminit: si sumpsero pinnas meas ante lucem et habitauero in postremis maris. etenim illic manus tua deducet me. suas itaque sumet, ut intellegatur eas ex his euacuatus adsumere.
And although these same things had fallen upon him as on a man, to dominate his weakness, yet to teach that he was not subject to what rushed upon him, he added: "And I said: Who will give me wings like a dove? And I will fly and be at rest." He is not weak who does not need to take wings from elsewhere to fly away from the darkness covering him and the fear of death. For when he says, "Who will give me?", it is not one asking from someone, but one who hopes from nowhere else. He hastens to fly away like a dove, that is, to return to spiritual nature. For the Spirit too, in the form of a dove, came flying and rested upon him, having found a dwelling at one time in that man who was then coming up from the waters of the Jordan. And this is the reason for the prayer: that, weighed down by the weakness of the body, he had taken up what is mortal in us, so that, having become flesh, he might fly away into spirit. He mentions these wings of his in another psalm thus: "If I take my wings before the dawn and dwell in the uttermost parts of the sea, even there your hand will lead me." He will take his own, then, so that it may be understood that, having emptied himself of them, he takes them up again.
54.8CSEL 22:152–153
Sed sumptis pinnis, ut uolando requiescat, quo sit quieturus, ostendit dicens: ecce elongaui fugiens et mansi in deserto. ceciderunt quidem super lucem tenebrae, sed tenebrae eam non conprehenderunt. elongauit enim fugiens. qui ne a contegentibus quidem potuit conprehendi. fugit ergo etiam eos, qui se persequebantur, et ab his longe factus habitat in deserto. et quod desertum hoc uel quae solitudo sit — nam eodem uerbo utrumque graecitas elocuta est — ita alius propheta declarat: laetare desertum sitiens, exsultet desertum et floreat tamquam lilium: et floreant et exsultent deserta Iordanis. inualescite manus inualidae et genua dissoluta: consolamini modici animi, sensu inualescite et nolite timere. ecce deus iudicium reddet, ipse ueniet et saluabit nos. tunc aperientur oculi caecorum et aures surdorum audient, erudietur lingua mutorum. tunc saliet claudus tamquam ceruus. uenerat quidem ad oues perditas domus Israhel; sed ab his fugatus haec deserta laetificat. in his enim manet et manet, postquam uolando requieuit. est enim dei requies, quae impiis denegatur, cum dicitur: si intrabunt in requiem meam; resumpta spiritali gloria unigenitus deus in his, tamquam in templo digno se, corporibus. quae erant antea deserta, requiescens, quia plures iam filii desertae magis quam eius, quae habet uirum.
But having taken wings so as to rest by flying, he shows where he will rest, saying: "Behold, I have gone far off in flight and remained in the desert." Darkness fell upon the light, but the darkness did not overcome it. For he went far off in flight, who could not be seized even by those who covered him. He fled, then, even those who persecuted him, and having gone far from them he dwells in the desert. And what this desert or solitude is (for the Greek expresses both by the same word) another prophet declares thus: "Rejoice, thirsty desert; let the desert exult and blossom like a lily; and let the deserts of the Jordan blossom and exult. Be strong, you weak hands and feeble knees; be comforted, you of little courage; be strong in mind and do not fear. Behold, God will render judgment; he himself will come and save us. Then the eyes of the blind will be opened and the ears of the deaf will hear; the tongue of the dumb will be taught. Then the lame will leap like a deer." He had come to the lost sheep of the house of Israel; but driven away by them he gladdens these deserts. For he remains in them, and remains after he has rested by flying. For it is the rest of God that is denied to the ungodly, when it is said, "If they shall enter into my rest"; the only-begotten God, having taken up again his spiritual glory, rests in these bodies, which were formerly desert, as in a temple worthy of him; for now the children of the desolate are more than those of her who has a husband.
54.9CSEL 22:153–154
Non sum autem nescius, plerosque solum uerborum sonum et litteram contuentes nihil de omnibus fere psalmis congruum aliquid personae domini nostri Iesu Christi existimare, putentque totum querellis prophetae increpari. sed nos litem non mouemus. neque enim destruimus, sed adstruimus, addentes potius de obscuris intellegentiam, quam simplicibus detrahentes: quia, quaecumque Dauid aut passus aut questus est, etiam passionibus eius, qui uniuersitatis nostrae caro est factus, inpleta sunt. et, ut arbitror, ea, quae secuntur, intellegentise nostrae cursum probabunt.
I am not unaware that many, looking only at the sound of the words and the letter, think that almost nothing in all the psalms is suited to the person of our Lord Jesus Christ, and suppose that the whole is a rebuke by the prophet's complaints. But we raise no dispute. For we do not destroy, but build up, adding understanding of obscure things rather than taking away from simple things; because whatever David either suffered or lamented was fulfilled also in the sufferings of him who became flesh for all of us. And, as I think, what follows will prove the course of our understanding.
54.10CSEL 22:154
Intercedens uero diapsalma demutauit et sensum. nam omnis rursum aduersum eos, de quibus est querella, fit sermo, honore tamen eius, ad quem omnia est referre solitus, antelato. sequitur enim: expectabam saluificantem me a pusillanimitate tempestate. non noua haec eius expectatio est; nam et in eo psalmo, quem ex persona eius esse non dubium est, sic precatus est: salua me, deus, quoniam intrauerunt aquae usque ad animam meam. infixus sum in limum profundi et non est substantia. ueni in altitudinem maris et tempestas demersit me. ab hac igitur tempestate atque ab hac pusillanimitate — humiliatus enim erat usque ad mortem crucis — saluari expectat ab eo, ad quem precatus est dicens: pater, clarifica me apud temetipsum claritate, quam habui apud te prius quam mundus esset.
The intervening diapsalma changed the sense too. For the whole discourse is again against those of whom the complaint is made, yet with honour first given to him to whom he is accustomed to refer everything. For there follows: "I was waiting for him who saves me from faintness of spirit and from the storm." This waiting of his is not new; for in that psalm too, which is undoubtedly in his person, he prayed thus: "Save me, God, for the waters have come in even to my soul. I am stuck in the mire of the deep, and there is no foothold. I came into the depth of the sea, and the storm sank me." From this storm, then, and from this faintness of spirit (for he had been humbled even to the death of the cross) he waits to be saved by him to whom he prayed, saying: "Father, glorify me with yourself with the glory which I had with you before the world was."
54.11CSEL 22:154–155
Sed expectans, saluari se, plus iam quam spem salutis expectat. sequitur enim: praecipita, domine, et diuide linguas eorum. proprietatem uerbi siue hebraici siue graeci latinitas, uti in multis, non elocuta est. nam id, quod praecipita dicitur, cum illis ϰαταπόντισον enuntiatum est: quo sermone non ut praecipitentur, sed ut in profundum demergantur, oratur. demergi ergo eos linguasque eorum diuidi rogat. quorum aliud sub Noe, aliud post aedificationem turris scimus effectum, cum illos diluuio submersos consumpsit profundum, hos uero linguarum diuisio ad causam aeternae inter se concertationis discreuit, ut conspirationem aduersus deum initam, dum se inuicem et nesciunt et metuunt, non tenerent. non dispar ergo nunc in hos poena deposcitur, scilicet ut iure gentium, quas in aquis significari meminimus, absumpti et in omnes linguas, cum quibus nunc habitant et quibus locuntur, diuisi amitterent uitae ac regni sui dignitatem.
But in waiting to be saved, he now waits for more than the hope of salvation. For there follows: "Cast them down, Lord, and divide their tongues." Latin, as in many cases, has not expressed the proper sense of the word, whether Hebrew or Greek. For what is said "cast down" is expressed by them as katapontison, by which word it is prayed not that they be cast down but that they be sunk into the depth. He asks, then, that they be sunk and their tongues divided. We know that the one was done under Noah and the other after the building of the tower: the depth consumed the former, drowned by the flood, while the division of tongues separated the latter, to be a cause of perpetual contention among themselves, so that, not knowing and fearing one another, they might not hold together the conspiracy they had begun against God. No different punishment, then, is now asked for these: that, swallowed up by the right of the nations, which we recall are signified by the waters, and divided among all the languages with which they now live and which they speak, they might lose the dignity of their life and kingdom.
54.12CSEL 22:155–156
Ut autem ob uitia ciuitatis contradictionemque praeceptorum suorum haec consecutura nosceremus, adiecit: quia uidi iniquitatem et contradictionem in ciuitate; die et nocte circumdabit eam super muros eius, et iniquitas et labor in medio eius: et non defecit de plateis eius usura et dolus. ob haec igitur uitia et crimina futurae captiuitatis et dispersionis poena deposcitur; sed potissima crimina sunt iniquitas et contradictio. nam eum, quem lex et prophetae nuntiauerant, reicientes contradictione impia respuerunt. quae contradictio nocte et die circumdans muros ciuitatis ipsius supergressa est, quia et ipsa passionis suae nocte, cum se uidendum in consessu et a dextris uirtutis profiteretur, discissa ueste etiam cum blasphemiae inuidia contradixerunt. in muris autem tuitionem salutis significari meminimus; sicut cum nouae Hierusales aedificatio et munitio, id est constructio et custodia ecclesiae caelestis optatur, ita scriptum est: benigne fac, domine, in bona uoluntate tua Sion et aedificentur muri Hierusalem. erat ergo tum in eo populo custodia spiritalis et dispositae per angelos legis administratio communiebatur. sed ubi ipso mediatore legis reiecto hos muros et hanc custodiam circumdans iniquitas supergressa est, tum coepit maius esse ipsa munitione peccatum, ut iniquitas uinceret custodiae uoluntatem, usura et dolo ceterisque, quae in lege sunt uetita, redundante.
So that we might know that these things would follow because of the vices of the city and its contradiction of his precepts, he added: "For I have seen iniquity and contradiction in the city; day and night it will surround it upon its walls; and iniquity and toil are in its midst; and usury and deceit have not departed from its streets." For these vices and crimes, then, the punishment of future captivity and dispersion is asked; but the chief crimes are iniquity and contradiction. For they rejected with ungodly contradiction the one whom the law and the prophets had announced. This contradiction, surrounding the walls of the city itself night and day, went over them, because on the very night of his passion, when he professed that he would be seen seated at the right hand of power, they tore their garment and contradicted him, with the odium of blasphemy besides. By walls, we recall, the protection of salvation is signified; as when the building and fortifying of the new Jerusalem, that is, the construction and guarding of the heavenly church, is desired, it is written thus: "Deal kindly, Lord, in your good will with Sion, and let the walls of Jerusalem be built." There was then in that people a spiritual guard, and it was fortified by the administration of the law ordained through angels. But when, the very mediator of the law having been rejected, iniquity surrounded and went over these walls and this guard, then sin began to be greater than the fortification itself, so that iniquity overcame the will of the guard, as usury, deceit, and other things forbidden in the law overflowed.
54.13CSEL 22:156–157
Et indignationem tantae huius iniquitatis ostendens subiecit: quoniam si inimicus meus inproperasset mihi. supportassem utique et si odiens me super me magna locutus fuisset, absconderem me utique ab eo. tu autem, homo unianime, dux meus et notus meus, qui simul mecum dulces capiebas cibos. in domo dei ingressi sumus cum concordia. querella non de passione est, sed de apostolo proditore. nam cum salutem generi humano suscepta crucis morte donaret, non potest uideri sacramentum hoc magnae pietatis arguere. nam utique si inimicus esset, querellae causa non esset, cum id in se consummaretur, quod ad salutem nostram perpeti ipse uoluisset; sicuti si odiens se locutus super se magna fuisset, absconsus ab eo fuisset, quia ei non cognitus in homine deus esset et ob hoc minus esset criminis nescienti — non enim gentes uerbum carnem factum pranuntia sibi lege didicerunt, quod utique his, qui sub lege sunt, etiam ipsis gestis ad speciem futura ueritatis aptatum est, cum et hominem Abraham adorauit et Iacob in homine deum uidit —; portasset utique haec obprobria gentium, quod, cum esset homo, se deum faceret, quod daemonium habens populum seduceret, quia ignorassent haec omnia in lege, quae ad Israhel lata est, contineri. uerumtamen cum unianimis et dux et notus haec faciat — unianimis, cum electus ad apostolum est; dux, cum demorante domino ipse ad praedicationem aduentus sui ad castella praemissus est et futuri regni dux ab eo ac princeps est constitutus; notus autem, cum omnes ingressus eius egressusque didicisset cognouissetque in hominis filio et dei filium, qui et particeps in demutando ex aqua uino et dulcificando in populi cibum hordeo extitisset conuiuioque eodem usus esset secumque dei domum semper esset ingressus —, maiorem de se querellam in hoc consortium diuini ministerii adsumptus exhibuit.
And showing his indignation at so great an iniquity he added: "For if my enemy had reproached me, I would surely have borne it; and if one who hated me had spoken great things against me, I would surely have hidden from him. But you, a man of one mind with me, my leader and my acquaintance, who took sweet food together with me; we entered the house of God in harmony." The complaint is not about the passion but about the apostle who betrayed him. For since by taking up the death of the cross he gave salvation to the human race, he cannot be thought to reproach this mystery of great godliness. For indeed, if it were an enemy, there would be no cause for complaint, since what he himself had willed to suffer for our salvation was being accomplished in him; just as, if one who hated him had spoken great things against him, he would have been hidden from him, because God in man was not known to him, and so there would be less crime for one who did not know (for the Gentiles had not learned from a law foretelling it that the Word would become flesh, which was adapted for those under the law even by events themselves as a likeness of the future truth, since Abraham worshipped a man and Jacob saw God in a man); he would surely have borne these reproaches from the Gentiles, that, being man, he made himself God, that, having a demon, he led the people astray, since they did not know that all these things were contained in the law given to Israel. But since one of one mind, a leader, and an acquaintance does these things (of one mind, when he was chosen as an apostle; a leader, when, while the Lord stayed behind, he was sent ahead to the villages to proclaim his coming and was appointed by him a leader and prince of the future kingdom; an acquaintance, since he had learned all his comings and goings and had known in the son of man the Son of God, and had shared in changing water into wine and in making the barley sweet as food for the people, and had used the same table and always entered the house of God with him), he, taken into this fellowship of divine ministry, gave cause for a greater complaint against himself.
54.14CSEL 22:157
Sed quamquam specialia haec in impietatem eius dicta essent, tamen poenae decretum refertur ad plures. ueniat mors super eos et descendant in infernum uiuentes, quoniam nequitia in hospitiis eorum, in medio eorum, ita super eos morte uentura, ut ad poenae sensum uiuentes descendant in infernum, cum in hospitiis eorum et in medio eorum, id est totos ipsos intra extraque nequitiae opera circumdent.
But although these things were said particularly of his ungodliness, the decree of punishment refers to many: "Let death come upon them, and let them go down alive into the underworld, for wickedness is in their dwellings, in their midst"; death coming upon them in such a way that they go down alive into the underworld to feel punishment, since works of wickedness surround them in their dwellings and in their midst, that is, wholly, within and without.
54.15CSEL 22:157–159
Verum ille haec agentibus atque meditantibus, ad quem spes et precatio sua esset, ostendit dicens: ego ad dominum clamaui et dominus exaudiuit me. uespere et mane et meridie narrabo, renuntiabo: et exaudiet uocem meam. liberauit in pace animam meam ab his, qui adpropiant mihi, quoniam inter multos erant mecum. et exaudiet me deus; et humiliauit eos, qui est ante saecula. clamorem fidelem mox dominus exaudiuit et hanc ipsam exauditi clamoris sui gratulationem uespere et mane et meridie narrabit, diem omnem in his diei partibus, per quas dies continetur, ostendens. talis autem temporum ordo non nisi ex prophetica scientia distributus est, ut uespere et mane et meridie nuntiet, quia secundum legem et obseruantiam legis a uespere dies coepta eadem ipsa usque ad meridiem deputatur, cum inchoationem diei non mane lux reddita, sed uespere nox facta perficiat. narrat ergo et renuntiat ea, quae psalmo continentur, quod uocem eius audiet et in pace animam suam liberet — pacificauit enim omnia in caelo et in terra — et liberet ab adpropiantibus sibi. superior enim querella de proximis, cum etiam unianimus et dux et notus haec ageret cum apostolis ceteris et ipse electus in apostolum. deus ergo, qui est ante ssecula, id est, per quem omnia sunt. quia ante omnia sit, exaudiet eum et humiliauit eos, cum indigni gloria aeternae resurrectionis effecti sint.
But while they were doing and plotting these things, he showed to whom his hope and prayer were directed, saying: "I cried to the Lord, and the Lord heard me. Evening and morning and noon I will tell, I will declare, and he will hear my voice. He has freed my soul in peace from those who draw near to me, for among many they were with me. And God will hear me; and he who is before the ages has humbled them." The Lord soon heard the faithful cry, and he will tell this very thanksgiving for his cry being heard evening and morning and noon, showing the whole day in these parts of the day by which the day is contained. Such an order of times was arranged only from prophetic knowledge, that he announces evening and morning and noon, because according to the law and the observance of the law, the day begun from evening is reckoned up to noon, since the beginning of the day is accomplished not by light returning in the morning but by night falling in the evening. He tells and declares, then, what is contained in the psalm: that he will hear his voice and free his soul in peace (for he has made peace for all things in heaven and on earth), and free it from those who draw near to him. For the earlier complaint was about those close to him, when one of one mind, a leader, and an acquaintance did these things together with the other apostles, himself chosen as an apostle. God, then, who is before the ages, that is, through whom all things are, because he is before all things, will hear him and has humbled them, since they have been made unworthy of the glory of the eternal resurrection.
54.16CSEL 22:159
Nam interiecto diapsalma omnem his ob inpaenitentem impietatis professionem spem recidit dicens: non enim est illis commutatio et non timuerunt. omnes secundum apostolum resurgent, sed non omnes commutabuntur, quia non timuerunt deum. fas enim fuerat ignorantes in homine deum resurgentem tamen deum ex mortuis credidisse, patente his etiam post passionis piaculum paenitentia et indulgentia. non enim solum non timuerunt deum, sed cum ad retribuendum his manum extendisset, id est auxilium obtulisset, contaminauerunt testamentum eius: cum eum, qui testamento legis ad salutem praenuntiatus est, reppulerunt. sequitur enim: extendit manum suam in retribuendo. contaminauerunt testamentum eius: diuisi sunt ab ira uultus eius. et idcirco demutatio his non relicta est, quia pro peccato semel mortuus et resurgens eos tantum demutatione donauit, qui secum per fidem et commortui sunt et resurgent. hos autem ab ira uultus sui euersa ciuitate diuisit partemque eorum cum infidelibus ponens eos uel dispersit in omnia, uel diuisit a sanctis.
For with a diapsalma interposed he cuts off from them all hope because of their unrepentant profession of ungodliness, saying: "For there is no change for them, and they have not feared." According to the apostle all will rise, but not all will be changed, because they did not fear God. For it would have been right for them, though they did not recognize God in the man, at least to believe God rising from the dead, since repentance and pardon were open to them even after the crime of the passion. For not only did they not fear God, but when he had stretched out his hand to repay them, that is, had offered help, they defiled his covenant, when they rejected him who was foretold for salvation by the covenant of the law. For there follows: "He stretched out his hand in repaying. They defiled his covenant; they were divided by the anger of his face." And therefore no change has been left them, because he who died once for sin and rose again granted change only to those who through faith both died with him and will rise with him. But these, when the city was overthrown, he divided by the anger of his face, and setting their portion with the unbelievers he either scattered them into all lands or divided them from the saints.
54.17CSEL 22:159–160
Dehinc de generali querella ad significationem eius, qui et dux et unanimus et notus fuerat, sermo se rettulit: et adpropiauit cor eius. mollierunt sermones eius super oleum, et ipsi sunt iacula. admixtus apostolis et curam pauperum agens, maximum scilicet ministerii opus curans, adpropiauit cor suum — ab adpropiantibus enim liberari animam suam gratulatus est —, non utique ministerio fidei adpropians, sed irae dei et contaminationi testamenti eius. ceterum ipse blandiloquus, emollito super oleum sermone curam agere se pauperum fallens etiam tum, cum pretiosi unguenti effuso alabastro conquestus est, tamquam id magis ueniri in sumptum inopum debuisset. sed ille occasionem furti de pecuniae conlatione quaerebat. et istiusmodi furti blandiloqui oleum psalmo alio euitat propheta, cum dicit: oleum peccatoris non inpinguet caput meum, quia sub specie boni operis malitiae arma conmoueat. sunt autem etiam in uerbis iacula, sicuti dentes scutum et sagittae sunt, et lingua machaera acuta est. haec igitur sermonum iacula detestatur, quae magis sub blandimento et adulatione nocitura sunt.
Then from the general complaint the discourse returned to signify him who had been leader, of one mind, and acquaintance: "And his heart drew near. His words were softer than oil, and they are darts." Mingled with the apostles and having the care of the poor, that is, caring for the greatest work of ministry, he drew his heart near (for he gave thanks that his soul was freed from those who drew near), not drawing near to the ministry of faith, but to the anger of God and the defiling of his covenant. Moreover, he was smooth-tongued, deceiving with speech softened beyond oil that he cared for the poor, even when he complained about the alabaster of precious ointment poured out, as if it ought rather to have been sold for the expenses of the needy. But he was seeking an occasion for theft from the collecting of money. And the prophet avoids the oil of such a smooth-tongued thief in another psalm, when he says: "Let not the oil of the sinner anoint my head," because under the appearance of a good work it moves the weapons of wickedness. There are darts in words too, as teeth are a shield and arrows, and the tongue a sharp sword. He detests, then, these darts of speech, which are the more harmful under flattery and adulation.
54.18CSEL 22:160–161
Sed inter ista inimici iacula inperterritus manet nobisque portum securitatis tutum fidumque demonstrans. sequitur enim: iacta in deum cogitationem tuam, et ipse te enutriet: non dabit in aeternum fluctuationem iusto. ademit nobis etiam in euangeliis dominus sollicitudinis necessitatem dicens: nolite solliciti esse de crastino; sufficit diei malitia sua. quaerite primum regnum dei et iustitiam, et omnia praestabuntur uobis: omnem scilicet curam in promerendo dei regno et iustitia collocandam. iactanda ergo cura super eum est: ipse enim enutriet, secundum illud: super aquam refectionis enutriuit me. enutriens autem non relinquet in fluctibus istius saeculi, sicuti enutritus Iacob omnem tempestatem et odiorum et durae seruitutis euasit dicens: deus, qui enutriuit me a iuuentute mea. ipse enim uitae auctor est, ipse cibi largitor, non terreni tantum, sed etiam spiritalis.
But amid these darts of the enemy he remains undaunted and shows us a safe and trustworthy harbour of security. For there follows: "Cast your thought upon God, and he will nourish you; he will not give the righteous to be tossed for ever." The Lord in the Gospels too took from us the necessity of anxiety, saying: "Do not be anxious about tomorrow; sufficient for the day is its own evil. Seek first the kingdom of God and his righteousness, and all things will be given to you": that is, all care is to be placed in deserving God's kingdom and righteousness. Care, then, is to be cast upon him, for he will nourish, according to that saying: "He has nourished me by the water of refreshment." And nourishing he will not leave us in the waves of this world, as Jacob, nourished, escaped every storm both of hatred and of hard slavery, saying: "God, who has nourished me from my youth." For he is the author of life, he the giver of food, not only earthly but also spiritual.
54.19CSEL 22:161
Sed illo super aquam refectionis educato et a procellae fluctibus liberato digna impios poena consequitur, cum dicit: tu uero, deus, deduces illos in puteum interitus. uiri sanguinum et dolositatis non exdimidiabunt dies suos: ego autem sperabo in te, domine. est quidem puteus aquae uiuae; sed est et puteus interitus secundum illud: non me demergat tempestas aquae, neque absorbeat me profundum, neque contineat super me puteus os suum. non relicto igitur in fluctuatione iusto illi in puteum interitus deducentur, cuius os clausum resurgenti ei inferis unigenito deo esse non potuit. ceterum post passionem domini statim eos belli uictoria cum excidio ciuitatis absumpsit: omni promiscua aetate ad satisfactionem uincentium interempta, non dimidiatis uitae diebus iuuentute prostrata. dies autem pleni sanctis et fidelibus reseruantur secundum illud: et dies pleni inuenientur in his, quorum spes semper in domino est: qui est benedictus in saecula saeculorum. amen.
But while he is brought up by the water of refreshment and freed from the waves of the storm, a worthy punishment follows the ungodly, when he says: "But you, God, will lead them down into the pit of destruction. Men of blood and deceit will not live out half their days; but I will hope in you, Lord." There is indeed a well of living water; but there is also a pit of destruction, according to that saying: "Let not the storm of water sink me, nor the deep swallow me up, nor the pit close its mouth over me." While the righteous one is not left to be tossed, then, they will be led into the pit of destruction, whose mouth could not be closed upon the only-begotten God when he rose from the underworld. Moreover, after the Lord's passion, the victory of war at once consumed them with the destruction of the city: every age without distinction was slain to satisfy the conquerors, and youth was laid low before half the days of life were lived. But full days are reserved for the saints and faithful, according to that saying: "And full days will be found in them"; in those whose hope is always in the Lord, who is blessed for ever and ever. Amen.
Tractates 55
55.1CSEL 22:162–163
Multa psalmi superscriptio conprehendit, quae praeter rerum gestarum notionem alterius intellegentiae intimant sensum, cum pro populo, qui a sanctis longe est, psalmus est, cum tituli inscriptio praefertur, cum postremo exordium ipsum in finem praescribitur. si enim eam solam querellam praesens sermo concineret, quod, cum fugeret, ab allophylis in Geth Dauid teneretur, totum se circa id tantum hic increpitae iniquitatis motus exsereret. at uero cum haec ante rei gestae significationem ad inbuendum legentis sensum dirigendumque prs'lata sint, sine dubio intellegimus per rerum gestarum, quae in Dauid gerebantur, effectus inprimi nobis secundum spiritum prophetiae earum rerum, quae sub his praescriptionibus significatae sunt, notionem: ut, quod Dauid passus est, praefiguratio fuerit passionum domini nostri Iesu Christi: ut. quod tituli inscriptio est, eius, qui moriendo uicerit, significata uideatur aeternitas, quia tituli inscriptio, quam στηλογραφία sermo graecitatis enuntiat, his maxime, qui probabilem uitam degentes etiam pro salute patriae mori bello non timuerint, ad aeternitatis gloriam deferatur. populus autem, qui longe sit factus a sanctis, Israhel indignus factus sanctificatione gentium longeque ab ea discedens esse noscendus est. quod autem in finem est, proprium ei esse, qui finis legis est, intellegatur: quod idipsum psalmi fine noscetur, cum huius ipsius intellegentiae nostrae absolutionem is maxime, quo psalmi finis concluditur, sermo declaret.
The heading of the psalm includes many things that, besides recording events, convey the sense of another understanding: that the psalm is "for the people that is far from the saints," that the inscription of a title is set before it, and finally that the beginning itself is headed "for the end." For if the present discourse sang only the complaint that David, while fleeing, was held by the foreigners in Gath, the whole movement of the iniquity rebuked here would have been directed to that alone. But since these things are set before the indication of the event to imbue and direct the reader's sense, we understand without doubt that, through the effects of the events that happened to David, there is impressed on us, according to the spirit of prophecy, the knowledge of the things signified under these headings: so that what David suffered was a prefiguring of the sufferings of our Lord Jesus Christ; so that the inscription of a title may be seen to signify the eternity of him who conquered by dying, because the inscription of a title, which the Greek language calls stēlographia, is conferred for the glory of eternity above all on those who, living an honourable life, did not fear to die in war even for the safety of their country. And the people that has become far from the saints is to be recognized as Israel, made unworthy of the sanctification of the Gentiles and departing far from it. And "for the end" is to be understood as proper to him who is the end of the law; this will be recognized from the end of the psalm, since the words with which the psalm's end concludes declare most of all the resolution of this our understanding.
55.2CSEL 22:163
Per haec ergo, quae superscriptioni praeter rerum gesta conexa sunt, psalmum etiam ex persona domini tractabimus: non tamen a prophetae ipsius dissidentes querellis. neque eum in his, quae pertulit, non etiam ingemuisse existimandum est; quia idcirco his ipsis, quae spiritalem sensum intimant, rerum gesta conexa sunt, ut per actionem prophetae sensus ac sermo notesceret prophetiae, cum propheta non tam spiritu quam passionibus prophetaret. erit ergo sermo inter Dauid ipsum et hominem Iesum Christum temperatus: ut, quia infirmitates omnium portauerit et peccatorum nostrorum frequenter et uoce sit usus et lacrimis, extra contumeliam dei sit et affectus et sermo qui hominis est.
Through these things, then, which are joined to the heading besides the events, we shall treat the psalm also as in the person of the Lord, yet without departing from the prophet's own complaints. Nor is it to be thought that he did not also groan in what he endured; for the events are joined to these very things that convey a spiritual sense precisely so that through the prophet's action the sense and words of the prophecy might become known, since the prophet prophesied not so much by the spirit as by his sufferings. The discourse, then, will be balanced between David himself and the man Jesus Christ, so that, since he bore the weaknesses of all and often used the voice and tears of our sins, the feeling and speech that are man's may be free of dishonour to God.
55.3CSEL 22:163–164
Miserere mei, domine, quoniam conculcauit me homo: tota die pugnans tribulauit me, conculcauerunt me inimici mei tota die. diem frequenter significari pro aetate cognouimus, ut ubi dies tota est, illic omne uitae tempus ostensum sit. neque enim uel Dauid uel dominus unius tantum diei insectatione uexatus est. sed qui misericordiam dei postulat seseque conculcatum esse conqueritur, habet securitatis et uirtutis suae arma, quibus non solum terrena odia, sed et spiritalium nequitiarum bella sustentat, aduersum quas potius quam aduersum carnem et sanguinem pugnam nobis apostolus docet esse. ministeriis enim impiorum utuntur ad uexationes tribulationesque sanctorum, cum eorum corda penetrantes in omnem eos impetum turbulentae mentis instigant.
"Have mercy on me, Lord, for man has trampled me; fighting all day long he has afflicted me; my enemies have trampled me all day long." We know that "day" is often used for a lifetime, so that where "all day" is said, the whole time of life is shown. For neither David nor the Lord was harassed by persecution on one day only. But he who asks for God's mercy and complains that he has been trampled has the weapons of his security and strength, with which he sustains not only earthly hatreds but also the wars of spiritual wickedness, against which, rather than against flesh and blood, the apostle teaches that our fight is. For they use the ministries of the ungodly to harass and afflict the saints, penetrating their hearts and inciting them to every onset of a turbulent mind.
55.4CSEL 22:164
Hanc igitur supereminentem in hoc saeculo efferentemque se altitudinem propheta non pertimescens ait: ab altitudine dierum non timebo; quia multi, qui debellant me, timebunt. scit aeterni iudicii diem, nouit etiam aeternum ignem poenis aeternis praeparatum: atque ideo magis illi, qui eum debellare temptant, timebunt, quia hoc non sancto timente in eos magis iudicii terror incumbet. pro fiducia uero securitatis suae subiecit: ego uero in te sperabo. in domino laudabo sermones meos tota die. spes omnes in deo conlocat sermonesque suos toto tempore uitae suae laudat. neque obscurum est, quid in loquente se laudet.
Not fearing this height that towers over and exalts itself in this world, the prophet says: "From the height of the days I will not fear; for many who war against me will fear." He knows the day of eternal judgment, he knows also the eternal fire prepared for eternal punishments; and therefore those who try to war against him will fear the more, because, while the saint does not fear, the terror of judgment will press the more upon them. And for the confidence of his security he added: "But I will hope in you. In the Lord I will praise my words all day long." He places all his hopes in God and praises his words for the whole time of his life. Nor is it obscure what he praises in his own speaking.
55.5CSEL 22:164–165
Uox enim haec sancto est digna, quae sequitur: in deo sperabo, non timebo quid faciat mihi caro. non hunc frangit saeculi terror, neque conspirantium aduersus se odia perturbant. spes enim, quae in deo est, terrores humanorum non pertimescit odiorum. carnem autem pro significatione hominum, per quam in corpore continentur, frequenter accipimus; uel cum dicitur de impiis: non habitabit spiritus meus in hominibus istis, quoniam caro sunt, uel illud: uidebit omnis caro salutare dei, uel illud apostoli: nonne estis carnales et secundum hominem ambulatis? manet itaque inperterritus sub misericordia dei atque ideo in eo sperans omnes carnis impetus insectationesque non metuit. sed digna plane etiam haec unigenito deo uox est, cui exinanienti se ex dei forma uirtutem dei atque naturam seruilis forma non abstulit. factus enim caro deus etiam in adsumptione carnis deus esse permansit, utens uirtutis suae sub consortio nostri corporis potestate. non enim carne est degrauatus, ne super undas ambularet, neque non ut usque ad fimbrias uestis uirtus diuinae potestatis exiret, neque ut non peccata dimitteret et sputo suo naturam uidendi caecis ab utero oculis accenderet et aure producta de uulnere abcisae auris uulnus obduceret, neque ut non solida parietum corpore interlabente penetraret. non ergo metuit a carne uel in deo sperans propheta uel sub adsumptione carnis deus opera diuina consummans.
For the words that follow are worthy of a saint: "In God I will hope; I will not fear what flesh may do to me." The terror of the world does not break him, nor do the hatreds of those conspiring against him disturb him. For hope that is in God does not fear the terrors of human hatred. We often take "flesh" to signify men, because of that by which they are contained in the body; as when it is said of the ungodly, "My Spirit shall not dwell in these men, because they are flesh," or that saying, "All flesh shall see the salvation of God," or the apostle's, "Are you not carnal and walking according to man?" He remains undaunted, then, under the mercy of God, and therefore, hoping in him, does not fear all the onsets and persecutions of flesh. But these words are indeed worthy also of the only-begotten God, from whom, when he emptied himself from the form of God, the form of a servant did not take away the power and nature of God. For God, made flesh, remained God even in assuming flesh, using the power of his strength in fellowship with our body. For he was not weighed down by flesh so as not to walk on the waves, nor so that the power of divine might should not go out even to the fringes of his garment, nor so as not to forgive sins, and with his spittle kindle the nature of sight in eyes blind from the womb, and, drawing out an ear, close the wound of the cut-off ear, nor so as not to pass through solid walls with his body slipping through. So neither the prophet, hoping in God, nor God, accomplishing divine works under the assumption of flesh, feared anything from the flesh.
55.6CSEL 22:165
In his etiam, quae consecuntur, rei in eo quoque gestae significatio continetur. ait enim: tota die uerba mea exsecrabantur: aduersus me omnia consilia eorum in malum. habitabunt et abscondent: ipsi calcaneum meum obseruabunt. nusquam enim nisi occultis consiliis aduersum eum et testimonia falsa et captiosae interrogationes sunt conparatae: in commune habitantes et consilia malitiae occulentes. sed et increpationem uerborum eius, quibus impietates eorum exprobrare non destitit, non tulerunt egressus quoque omnes ipsius in calcaneo contuentes, tum in eius supplantationem fraudulentas conspirationes ineuntes: ob quod eos digna haec iudicii sententia conprehendit.
In what follows, too, the meaning of what happened to him is contained. For he says: "All day long they cursed my words; all their counsels against me were for evil. They will dwell and hide; they will watch my heel." For nowhere except in secret counsels were false testimonies and captious questions prepared against him, as they dwelt together and hid their counsels of malice. They also did not bear the rebuke of his words, with which he did not cease to reproach their ungodliness, watching all his goings out at his heel, and then entering into fraudulent conspiracies to trip him up; for which this worthy sentence of judgment overtakes them.
55.7CSEL 22:165–166
Sequitur enim: sicut expectauerunt animam meam, pro nihilo saluos facies illos, in ira populos deduces. nouus hic prophetae sermo est, ut eos, qui expectent animam suam, ad nihilum deus saluet, et cum aliud sit nihilum, aliud saluari, nunc salus, quae in eos fiet, in nihilum sit. est ergo quod saluetur in nihilum? est plane, quicquid resurrectione concessa demutatione non dignum est. nam cum omnis caro redempta in Christo sit, ut resurgat, et omnem adsistere ante tribunal eius necesse sit, non tamen omnibus gloria et honor est promiscuus resurgendi. quibus ergo tantum resurrectio, non etiam demutatio est tributa. hi saluantur in nihilum. in ira enim deducentur hi populi, quibus ad poenae sensum salus resurrectionis est constituta; a qua ira eripiendos nos apostolus pollicetur dicens: quoniam si, cum adhuc peccatores essemus, Christus pro nobis mortuus est. multo magis iustificati in sanguine eius saluabimur per eum ab ira. pro peccatoribus igitur ad salutem resurrectionis est mortuus, sed sanctificatos in sanguine suo saluabit ab ira.
For there follows: "As they waited for my soul, you will save them for nothing; in anger you will lead down the peoples." This is a new saying of the prophet, that God saves for nothing those who wait for his soul; and though nothing is one thing and being saved another, now the salvation that will come to them is for nothing. Is there, then, anything that is saved for nothing? There is indeed: whatever, when resurrection is granted, is not worthy of change. For although all flesh has been redeemed in Christ so as to rise, and all must stand before his judgment seat, yet the glory and honour of rising is not common to all. Those, then, to whom only resurrection, not also change, is given are saved for nothing. For these peoples will be led down in anger, for whom the salvation of resurrection is appointed for the feeling of punishment; from which anger the apostle promises that we are to be rescued, saying: "For if, while we were still sinners, Christ died for us, much more, justified by his blood, we shall be saved through him from anger." For sinners, then, he died for the salvation of resurrection; but those sanctified in his blood he will save from anger.
55.8CSEL 22:166
Denique pro nihilo populis saluatis et in ira deductis spem uitae suae sanctus hic nuntiat dicens: deus, uitam meam nuntiaui tibi, posuisti lacrimas meas in conspectu tuo, sicut in promissione tua. dignus promissione dei est ob constantiam praedicandi et ob meritum non tacendi: lacrimae enim suae, quas uel pro se propheta uel pro nobis dominus profudit, in dei sunt conspectu, legatione earum ad obtinenda, quae deus promisit, usurus.
Then, the peoples having been saved for nothing and led down in anger, this holy one announces the hope of his life, saying: "God, I have declared my life to you; you have set my tears in your sight, as in your promise." He is worthy of God's promise because of the constancy of his preaching and the merit of not keeping silent; for his tears, which either the prophet shed for himself or the Lord for us, are in God's sight, and he will use their embassy to obtain what God has promised.
55.9CSEL 22:166
Sed se gratiam aeternae promissionis inituro inimici eius conuertentur retrorsum, ut, quo in ira deducerentur, ostenderet. id enim sequitur: conuertentur inimici mei retrorsum, in quacumque die inuocauero te. illo deum inuocante illi eo, unde processerint, conuertentur: deducente eos dei ira et resumpto ad poenas corpore puniendo.
But when he is about to enter the grace of the eternal promise, his enemies will be turned back, to show where they would be led down in anger. For this follows: "My enemies will be turned back on whatever day I call upon you." When he calls upon God, they will be turned back to where they came from, the anger of God leading them down and their body taken up again to be punished with penalties.
55.10CSEL 22:166–167
Sed illis ad seternitatem poenae in infernum post resurrectionem reuersis hic officio gratulationis suae fungitur, dum ait: ecce cognoui, quia deus meus es tu, et in deo laudabo uerbum. hoc ergo uerbum suum in deo laudat, quod deum suum esse cognouit.
But when they have returned after the resurrection to the underworld for the eternity of punishment, he performs the duty of his thanksgiving, saying: "Behold, I have known that you are my God, and in God I will praise the word." He praises in God, then, this word of his, that he has known him to be his God.
55.11CSEL 22:167
Neque id tantum laudat, sed etiam illud, quod sperauit in eo non metuens, quid homo sibi faciat. haec plane digna sanctis omnibus uox est, constanter inter insectationes humanas fidem tenere et metu terrenae turbulentiae non moueri speque certissima quod aliquid aduersum animae aeternitatem homo effecturos sit non timere, cum post intercessionem mortis istius in immortalem gloriam et corruptio et infirmitas nostra mutetur. atque ob id sermones suos, quibus se sperantem in domino humanam uim protestatur non metuere, conlaudat dicens: in domino laudabo sermonem, in domino sperabo: non timebo, quid faciat mihi homo. ob hoc ergo sermonem suum laudat in domino, quia sperans in eo hominem non timebit.
Nor does he praise this only, but also that he hoped in him, not fearing what man may do to him. These words are indeed worthy of all the saints: to hold faith steadfastly amid human persecutions, not to be moved by fear of earthly turmoil, and with most certain hope not to fear that man will accomplish anything against the eternity of the soul, since after the interval of this death both our corruption and our weakness will be changed into immortal glory. And for this reason he praises his words, by which he protests that, hoping in the Lord, he does not fear human force, saying: "In the Lord I will praise the word, in the Lord I will hope; I will not fear what man may do to me." For this reason, then, he praises his word in the Lord, that, hoping in him, he will not fear man.
55.12CSEL 22:167–168
Sed ut doceret, idcirco se nihil ab homine pertimescere, quia, si quid potestatis suae exseruisset in corpore. id rursum resurrectionis gloria sine corporum labe redhiberet, subiecit: in me sunt, deus, uota quae reddam laudationis tibi: quoniam eruisti animam meam a morte et pedes meos de lapsu; ut placeam coram deo in lumine uiuentium. non extra se sunt ista, quae sperat, nec laudationis uota, quae reddet, sunt extrinsecus capessenda. ipse enim sibi resurrectionis est dominus; ipse huic mortuo et intra sepulcrum relicto corpori diuinae naturae suae tribuit consortium. neque enim resurrecturis omnibus ab exteriore materia corpus adquiritur neque peregrinae originis externarumque causarum natura redhibetur: sed idipsum in profectum aeternae claritatis emerget, fietque in eo demutatione potius quam creatione, quod nouum sit. sunt ergo in se uota, quae reddet tum cum infirmitas corporum detrahetur, id est lapsus et lacrimae; tum, cum corruptionem incorruptio deuorabit, tum, cum mortem potestas inmortalis absorbebit, tum, cum sit deus omnia in omnibus, tum, cum lumen uiuentium sit in eodem uiuentium lumine deo ipse placiturus. nam si sibi in creatione mundi secundum Sapientiae professionem super filiis hominum adgaudebat pater, longe magis in reconciliatione mundi intellegendus est patri esse placiturus. est enim lux uera mundi, inluminans omnem hominem uenientem in hunc mundum, dominus noster Iesus Christus, qui est benedictus in saecula saeculorum. amen.
But to teach that he fears nothing from man for this reason, that if man exercised any of his power on the body, the glory of the resurrection would restore it again without bodily blemish, he added: "In me, God, are the vows of praise which I will render to you; for you have rescued my soul from death and my feet from slipping, that I may please before God in the light of the living." These things he hopes for are not outside him, nor are the vows of praise he will render to be sought from outside. For he himself is the lord of his own resurrection; he himself gives to this body, dead and left in the tomb, the fellowship of his divine nature. For a body is not acquired from outside material by all who will rise, nor is a nature of foreign origin and external causes restored; but the same body will emerge for the advance of eternal brightness, and what is new in it will come about by change rather than by creation. In him, then, are the vows which he will render when the weakness of bodies is taken away, that is, slips and tears; when incorruption devours corruption; when immortal power swallows up death; when God is all in all; when he, the light of the living, will please God in the same light of the living. For if, according to the declaration of Wisdom, the Father rejoiced over the sons of men at the creation of the world, much more is he to be understood as pleasing the Father in the reconciliation of the world. For he is the true light of the world, enlightening every man coming into this world, our Lord Jesus Christ, who is blessed for ever and ever. Amen.
Tractates 56
56.1CSEL 22:168–169
De superioris psalmi superscriptione id tantum demutatum in consequenti est, quod, ubi pro populo longe a sanctis facto praenotatum est, nunc corrumpas uel disperdas praescribitur, quod uno uerbo μὴ διαφθείρῃς utrumque graecus sermo conplexus est. consequens enim erat, ut, quia corruptio eos, qui longe a sanctis discederent, mansura esset, ne huic sanctus subderetur oraret. nam et in psalmo alio gratulationem auersae huius a se corruptionis ostendit dicens: nec dabis sanctum tuum uidere corruptionem. neque ambiguum est psalmum hunc secundum apostolorum professionem ex persona esse domini intellegendum.
In the heading of the following psalm only this is changed from that of the preceding one: where "for the people that has become far from the saints" was noted, now "do not corrupt" or "do not destroy" is set, both of which the Greek language includes in one word, mē diaphtheirēs. For it followed that, since corruption would await those who departed far from the saints, the holy one should pray not to be subjected to it. For in another psalm too he shows thanksgiving for this corruption being turned away from him, saying: "Nor will you give your holy one to see corruption." Nor is there doubt that this psalm is to be understood, according to the apostles' declaration, in the person of the Lord.
56.2CSEL 22:169
Itaque Dauid ad humanae carnis gloriam resurrectionis dominicae tempus expectans nunc et non corrumpi se rogat et auersam a se corruptionem in eo, in quo primitiae resurrectionis sunt, prophetae praescientia gratulatur. ideo autem: in finem tituli inscriptio est, quia et gloriosa ad aeternitatis honorem uita suscepta et mors plurimis salutaris uirorum fortium inscribatur sepulcris et haec omnia ad eum referri oporteat, qui uel finis est legis, uel quem psalmi ipsius finis ostendat. id autem. quod in spelunca clausus haec loquitur, tempus est prophetiae, quo psalmum intellegitur scripsisse, ipsa illa speluncae habitatione mansuri in corpore domini humilitatem prophetans. ceterum uideri non potest, ut qui ob metum erat intra speluncam reconditus, psalterio et cithara, ut testatur in psalmo, id est totius artis musicae perstreperet apparatu.
So David, awaiting the time of the Lord's resurrection for the glory of human flesh, now both asks not to be corrupted and, with a prophet's foreknowledge, gives thanks that corruption has been turned away from him in him in whom are the firstfruits of the resurrection. The inscription of the title is "for the end" because both a glorious life undertaken for the honour of eternity and a death saving to many are inscribed on the tombs of brave men, and all these things must be referred to him who is the end of the law or whom the end of the psalm shows. And his saying these things while shut up in a cave is the time of the prophecy at which he is understood to have written the psalm, prophesying by that very dwelling in the cave the lowliness of the Lord, who was to dwell in a body. For it cannot be thought that one who had hidden in a cave out of fear would make a din with psaltery and harp, as he testifies in the psalm, that is, with the apparatus of the whole musical art.
56.3CSEL 22:169–170
Coepit autem ita: miserere mei, deus, miserere mei: quoniam in te confidit anima mea. misericordiam rogat, quia confidit in domino. docens ab his misericordiam dei sperandam esse, qui crederent. et misericordiae dei quod momentum quiue sit effectus, ostendit dicens: et in umbra alarum tuarum sperabo, donec transeat iniquitas. auibus naturae est infirmitatem pullorum alis inumbrare eosque a praeteruolantium ui atque inprobitate defendere. quod et in gallinis maxime noscimus, cum collectos intra pinnas fetus suos aut opacant aut tuentur. quarum consuetudinem ad exemplum sollicitudinis suae dominus commemorat dicens ad Hierusalem interfectricem prophetarum: quotiens uolui colligere filios tuos, sicut gallina, quae congregat pullos suos sub alas suas et noluisti? sperat ergo in umbra alarum dei sanctus. donec iniquitas transeat, id est dum aut saeculi scandala, aut iniquitates impiorum, aut terrenae humilitatis infirmitatem, dum hanc ipsam quasi speluncam habitaculi et corporis sui Dauid, qua nunc est clausus, euadit.
It began thus: "Have mercy on me, God, have mercy on me, for my soul trusts in you." He asks for mercy because he trusts in the Lord, teaching that the mercy of God is to be hoped for by those who believe. And he shows what weight and effect the mercy of God has, saying: "And in the shadow of your wings I will hope, until iniquity passes." It is the nature of birds to shade the weakness of their chicks with their wings and defend them from the force and wickedness of those flying past. We know this best in hens, when they either shade or protect their young gathered under their feathers. The Lord mentions their habit as an example of his own care, saying to Jerusalem, the killer of the prophets: "How often I wished to gather your children, as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, and you would not?" The holy one, then, hopes in the shadow of God's wings until iniquity passes, that is, while he escapes either the scandals of the world, or the iniquities of the ungodly, or the weakness of earthly lowliness, while David escapes this very cave, as it were, of his dwelling and body, in which he is now shut up.
56.4CSEL 22:170–171
Sed sperans sub umbra alarum dei officio spei suae semper intentus est dicens: clamabo ad deum altissimum, deum, qui benefecit mihi. clamat fide potius quam uoce. qui fugiens et latens clamat. porro autem non est in sermone sperantis gratulatio adeptorum; sed propheticae scientiae ac fidei est, gerendis non aliter gaudere quam gestis et idcirco ad eum, qui sub indemutabili constitutione bonitatis iam sibi benefecerit, clamat; et quatenus benefecerit dominus, consequentibus docet dicens: misit de caelo et liberauit me, dedit in obprobrium conculcantes me. misit deus misericordiam suam et ueritatem suam, animam meam eripuit de medio catulorum leonum; dormiui conturbatus. dignum fuit, etiamsi nulla demutatio personae esset ac sensus, diapsalma interuenire, quia ad intellegentiam dictorum sensus esset credentium erigendus. benefecit deus sancto suo, mittendo de caelo, ut liberato eo in obprobrium hi, qui eum conculcabant, darentur. et misit misericordiam suam ac ueritatem ad eripiendam de catulorum medio animam ipsius, tum cum conturbatus dormisset. si mors significatur in somno, uel cum dormiturus Dauid cum patribus suis est, uel cum dormiens Lazarus excitandus est, uel cum centurionis illius non est mortua puella sed dormit, uel cum eos, qui dormierunt, non praeueniemus in resurrectione, si conturbatio dormientis significatio est passionis, cum dicitur: nunc anima mea turbata est ualde, quam tamen eripi de manu canis ita antea est deprecatus: libera me de ore leonis et de manu canis unicam meam et non alii canum uel leonum catuli intellegi possunt, quam qui sunt et natio uiperarum, de quorum medio anima eripitur et eripitur per missam e caelo misericordiam et ueritatem secundum illud: misericordia et ueritas sibi obuiauerunt et si misericordia et ueritas dominus Iesus Christus est: non ambigitur, quin illi in obprobrium deducantur, qui conculcantes dominum in passione ista non credunt; quibus utique obprobrium est unigeniti dei aduentum et peccatorum indulgentiam perdidisse.
But hoping under the shadow of God's wings, he is always intent on the duty of his hope, saying: "I will cry to God most high, to God who has done good to me." He cries by faith rather than by voice, he who cries while fleeing and hiding. Further, there is no thanksgiving for things obtained in the words of one who hopes; but it belongs to prophetic knowledge and faith to rejoice in things to be done no differently than in things done, and therefore he cries to him who, by the unchangeable constitution of his goodness, has already done good to him; and how far the Lord has done good he teaches in what follows, saying: "He sent from heaven and freed me; he gave over to reproach those who trampled me. God sent his mercy and his truth; he rescued my soul from the midst of the lions' whelps; I slept troubled." It was fitting, even if there were no change of person or sense, that a diapsalma should intervene, because the sense of believers was to be raised to the understanding of what is said. God did good to his holy one by sending from heaven, so that, when he was freed, those who trampled him were given over to reproach. And he sent his mercy and truth to rescue his soul from the midst of the whelps when he had slept troubled. If death is signified by sleep, as when David is to sleep with his fathers, or when the sleeping Lazarus is to be awakened, or when the girl of that centurion is not dead but sleeps, or when we shall not precede those who have slept in the resurrection; if the trouble of the sleeper signifies the passion, when it is said, "Now my soul is very troubled," which soul he had earlier prayed to be rescued from the hand of the dog thus: "Free me from the mouth of the lion, and my only one from the hand of the dog"; and if the whelps of dogs or lions can be understood as none other than those who are also a brood of vipers, from whose midst the soul is rescued, and rescued through the mercy and truth sent from heaven, according to the saying, "Mercy and truth have met each other"; and if mercy and truth is the Lord Jesus Christ: there is no doubt that those are led into reproach who, having trampled the Lord in that passion, do not believe; for whom indeed it is a reproach to have lost the coming of the only-begotten God and the forgiveness of sins.
56.5CSEL 22:171–172
Et quia huic sanctorum spei uel persequentum odia uel negantum aduersatura semper essent, conmemoratis humanae salutis sacramentis subiecit: filii hominum, dentes eorum scutum et sagittae et lingua eorum machaera acuta. uitia motusque animorum sub corporalibus officiis diuinus sermo significat, ut in deuteronomii cantico: incrassauit et calcitrauit dilectus, impietatis luxu sub significatione consuetudinis corporalis increpito, uel illud: qui deuorant plebem meam ut cibum panis, uel etiam: dentes peccatorum contriuisti. nec non et apostoli: quod si mordetis inuicem, uidete, ne consumamini ab inuicem, ut quod singulis quibusque membris officii actionisque mandatum est, id ad efficientiam mentium animorumque referatur: ut nunc uel persequentium uel obtrectantium commemoraturus effectus ait: filii hominum, dentes eorum scutum et sagittae et lingua eorum machaera acuta, cum et consumerent saeuitia potestatis et obtrectationum iaculis uulnerarent.
And since the hatreds of persecutors or deniers would always oppose this hope of the saints, having recalled the mysteries of human salvation he added: "Sons of men, their teeth are a shield and arrows, and their tongue a sharp sword." The divine word signifies the vices and movements of minds under bodily functions, as in the song of Deuteronomy: "The beloved grew fat and kicked," where the luxury of ungodliness is rebuked under the image of a bodily habit; or that saying, "Who devour my people like a meal of bread"; or again, "You have broken the teeth of sinners"; and also the apostle's, "But if you bite one another, take care that you are not consumed by one another"; so that what is assigned as function and action to each member is referred to the working of minds and souls. So now, about to recount the effects of persecutors or detractors, he says, "Sons of men, their teeth are a shield and arrows, and their tongue a sharp sword," since they both consumed by the cruelty of power and wounded with the darts of detraction.
56.6CSEL 22:172
Sed inter haec, quae scit et expectat, propheta non tacuit. deprecatus enim, ne corrumperetur, absorbendae corruptionis istius tempus exoptat dicens: exaltare super caelos, deus, et super omnem terram gloria tua. quae in altum de humilibus efferuntur, ea exaltari uidentur, quia per profectum quendam in id, quod sublimius est, euadunt quod autem super caelos exaltandum est, necesse est ut prius descenderit ad inferiora de caelis, per quod rursum exaltandum sit super caelos. quod idipsum apostolus absolutissime ita dicit: qui cum ascendisset in altitudinem, captiuam egit captiuitatem, dedit dona hominibus. ascendit autem quid est, nisi quia et descendit in inferiora terrae? qui descendit, ipse est et qui ascendit super omnes caelos, ut adimpleat omnia, hinc exaltandi super caelos causam significans extitisse, quod descendendi usque in inferiora terrae humilitas esset assumpta. ex uoto ergo propheta praenuntiat exaltari super caelos deum. et quia exaltatus super caelos impleturus esset in terris omnia sancti spiritus sui gloria. subiecit: et super omnem terram gloria tua: cum effusum super omnem carnem spiritus donum gloriam exaltati super caelos domini protestaretur.
But amid these things, which he knows and awaits, the prophet did not keep silent. For having prayed not to be corrupted, he longs for the time when this corruption will be swallowed up, saying: "Be exalted above the heavens, God, and your glory above all the earth." Things raised up on high from low places are seen to be exalted, because by a kind of advance they come out into what is higher; but what is to be exalted above the heavens must first have come down from the heavens to lower places, by which it is to be exalted again above the heavens. The apostle says this very thing most completely thus: "When he ascended on high he led captivity captive; he gave gifts to men. What does 'he ascended' mean, except that he also descended into the lower parts of the earth? He who descended is the same who ascended above all the heavens, that he might fill all things"; signifying that the cause of his being exalted above the heavens arose from this, that the lowliness of descending even to the lower parts of the earth had been assumed. The prophet, then, foretells as a vow that God is exalted above the heavens. And since, exalted above the heavens, he would fill all things on earth with the glory of his Holy Spirit, he added: "and your glory above all the earth," since the gift of the Spirit poured out upon all flesh would bear witness to the glory of the Lord exalted above the heavens.
56.7CSEL 22:172–173
Omnis autem hic profectus non naturae diuinae, sed infirmitati hominis optatur: quia se per assumptionem carnis in caelestibus collocandum propheta non nescit, quippe cum concorporales et participes effecti simus in Christo Iesu. et idcirco haec ad carnis suae infirmitatem, quae et in passionibus domini neganda et super caelos esset exaltanda, conexuit: laqueos parauerunt pedibus meis et incuruauerunt animam meam. foderunt ante faciem meam foueam et inciderunt in eam. per conpassionis fidem etiam se ipso in domino propheta patiente, tamquam et ipse sit passus, haec queritur. sed in eos, qui maiestatis dominum persecuti sunt, cum in foueam praeparatam inciderint, mortis ipsius et sensus refertur et poena.
All this advance, however, is desired not for the divine nature but for the weakness of man; because the prophet is not unaware that through the assumption of flesh he is to be placed in the heavenly places, since we have been made fellow members of the body and sharers in Christ Jesus. And therefore he joined these things to the weakness of his flesh, which was both to be denied in the Lord's sufferings and to be exalted above the heavens: "They prepared snares for my feet and bowed down my soul. They dug a pit before my face and fell into it." Through the faith of suffering with him, the prophet himself suffering in the Lord, as if he too had suffered, makes this complaint. But upon those who persecuted the Lord of majesty, when they fell into the pit they had prepared, both the sense and the punishment of death itself are turned back.
56.8CSEL 22:173–174
Et quia conpatiendi et conmoriendi fides nos glorificat in Christo, uelut in procinctu spei fideique huius propheta consistit dicens: paratum cor meum, deus, paratum cor meum: cantabo et psalmum dicam tibi. exsurge, gloria mea, exsurge psalterium et cithara. exsurgam diluculo, confitebor tibi in populis, domine, psalmum dicam tibi in gentibus. interiecto diapsalma hunc ad deum rettulit propheta sermonem psalmi interim fide haec eadem, in quae cor eius paratum est, concinendo; et animi sui et corporis gaudia sub significatione psalterii et citharae adhortatus sese ipsum in eo, quod cantet psalmumque dicat, ostendit. ait enim: exsurge, gloria mea, exsurge, psalterium et cithara: exsurgam diluculo, seipsum scilicet ostendi in psalterio citharaque declarans, cum ad exsurgendum cithara psalterioque commonitis ipse potius, qui in his significetur, exsurgat. exsurgens autem diluculo cum gloria sua spei euangelicae gloriam cantat, congruente diluculi et orationis tempore et salutis. nam id sequitur: confitebor tibi in populis, domine, psalmum dicam tibi inter gentes. laudaturus in populis et in gentibus deum necesse est ut in eo salutem gentium laudet: quia iam non in uno Israhel funiculum hereditatis artatum sit, neque Iacob portio, sed terrae plenitudo iam dei sit; neque simus iam imago terreni, sed imago caelestis.
And since the faith of suffering with and dying with glorifies us in Christ, the prophet stands as if girded in this hope and faith, saying: "My heart is ready, God, my heart is ready; I will sing and say a psalm to you. Awake, my glory, awake, psaltery and harp. I will awake at dawn; I will confess to you among the peoples, Lord; I will say a psalm to you among the nations." With a diapsalma interposed the prophet referred this speech of the psalm to God, singing meanwhile by faith the very things for which his heart is ready; and under the image of the psaltery and harp he showed that he exhorted himself to the joys of his soul and body in singing and saying a psalm. For he says: "Awake, my glory, awake, psaltery and harp; I will awake at dawn," declaring that he himself is shown in the psaltery and harp, since, when the harp and psaltery are urged to awake, it is rather he who is signified in them that awakes. And awaking at dawn with his glory he sings the glory of the gospel hope, the time of dawn agreeing with that of prayer and of salvation. For there follows: "I will confess to you among the peoples, Lord; I will say a psalm to you among the nations." One who is to praise God among the peoples and nations must praise in him the salvation of the nations, because the measuring line of the inheritance is no longer confined to the one Israel, nor is Jacob the portion, but the fullness of the earth is now God's; and we are no longer the image of the earthly, but the image of the heavenly.
56.9CSEL 22:174
Quid autem confitendum in populis psallendumque inter gentes esset, ostendit: quia magnificata est usque ad cselos misericordia tua et usque ad nubes ueritas tua. haec est ergo in populis gentibusque confessio, quia magnificata usque ad caelos misericordia sit et ueritas usque ad nubes. nam cum domino obuiam sancti rapientur in nubibus ipso illo nube in resurrectionis corpore eleuato creatura omnis secundum apostolum a corruptione sit liberanda pacificataque omnia per eum et in caelo sint et in terra, merito et usque ad nubes ueritas nostrae in eo resurrectionis ecfertur et magnificatur usque ad caelos misericordia eius, congemescentis creaturae corruptione depulsa. sed horum quidem usque ad nubes et usque ad caelos significatur elatio; uerum illi proprium est caelos transgredi et omnem sensum existimatae sublimitatis euadere.
He showed what was to be confessed among the peoples and sung among the nations: "For your mercy has been magnified even to the heavens, and your truth even to the clouds." This, then, is the confession among peoples and nations, that mercy has been magnified even to the heavens and truth even to the clouds. For when the saints will be caught up in the clouds to meet the Lord, he himself having been raised in a cloud in the body of the resurrection, and according to the apostle the whole creation is to be freed from corruption, and all things have been made peaceful through him both in heaven and on earth, rightly the truth of our resurrection in him is carried even to the clouds, and his mercy is magnified even to the heavens, when the corruption of the groaning creation has been driven away. But the elevation of these is signified as reaching to the clouds and to the heavens; whereas it is proper to him to go beyond the heavens and to pass beyond every sense of conceived loftiness.
56.10CSEL 22:174–175
Repetita itaque spei suae precatione propheta sic clausit: exaltare super cselos, deus, et super omnem terram gloria tua. nullus exaltando deo modus est: nam super caelos eius elatio est. dominus enim creaturarum ultra creaturas intellegendus est. et cum nobis non aliud sit in cognitione quam caelum, ultra omnem sensum est, qui super caelos exaltatus sensum notionis excedit. misericordia quidem eius usque in nos redundauit, sed magnificata usque ad caelos in caelestibus mox futuris. et cum usque ad nubes ueritas eius elata sit nobis obuiam in nube rapiendis, sed caelos omnes tamen consessurus a dei dextris ipse transcendit, gloria quoque eius in terris, id est nobiscum mansura, cum dicit: ecce ego uobiscum sum omnibus diebus usque in consummationem saeculi, dominus noster Iesus Christus, qui est benedictus in saecula saeculorum. amen.
So, repeating the prayer of his hope, the prophet closed thus: "Be exalted above the heavens, God, and your glory above all the earth." There is no limit to the exaltation of God, for his elevation is above the heavens. For the Lord of creatures is to be understood as beyond creatures. And since nothing is in our knowledge but heaven, he who, exalted above the heavens, exceeds the sense of knowledge is beyond every sense. His mercy has indeed overflowed even to us, but has been magnified even to the heavens in the heavenly things soon to come. And though his truth has been raised even to the clouds for us who are to be caught up to meet him in a cloud, yet he himself, about to sit at the right hand of God, transcends all the heavens; and his glory too will remain on earth, that is, with us, as he says: "Behold, I am with you all days, until the consummation of the age," our Lord Jesus Christ, who is blessed for ever and ever. Amen.
Tractates 57
57.1CSEL 22:175
De superioris psalmi superscriptione sola deest significatio aliqua gestorum. nam et in finem et ne disperdas et tituli inscriptio est. neque enim psalmus quicquam per rerum gesta continet prophetiae, ut, sicut ceteris, sanctus Dauid et dictis prophetet et gestis: sed increpatio in impios et denuntiatio iudicii dei in peccatores et retributio laetitiae in sanctos et fructus homini iustitiae continetur. hic ergo finis in psalmo est, haec depellendae corruptionis fiducia, haec ei, qui nos per mortem redemit, tituli inscriptio est.
From the heading of the preceding psalm only some indication of events is lacking. For there is "for the end," and "do not destroy," and "inscription of a title." For the psalm contains no prophecy through events, as in the others, where holy David prophesies both by words and by deeds; rather it contains a rebuke of the ungodly, the announcement of God's judgment on sinners, the recompense of joy for the saints, and the fruit of righteousness for man. This, then, is the end in the psalm, this the confidence of driving away corruption, this the inscription of the title for him who redeemed us through death.
57.2CSEL 22:175–176
Et quidem talem totus psalmus ipse se profert: si uere utique iustitias loquimini, directa iudicate filii hominum. etenim in corde iniquitates operamini, in terra iniquitatem conplectuntur manus uestrae. iustitiae sermo communis est; sed sequi iudicii studium et consuetudo paucorum est. sed plane tum uere quis loqui iustitiam existimandus est, cum iudicium retineat ueritatis, deo ob id non eloquia humana, sed cordis opera, id est cogitationum molitiones iudicante. solet autem iniquitas sub publicae conscientiae pudore non peragi; et ideo, licet conplexae manus non sint ut iniquitatem, tamen iniquitatem deo cor operatur in terra. hinc adulterium solo conceptum corde iam crimen est, hinc secundum Pauli euangelium secreta hominum deus iudicat, uoluntates hominum deo iam in ipsis humanae natiuitatis exordiis contuente. nam cum naturae potentis uirtus non tam uiscerum fibras quam adpetitus mentis introeat, necesse est non per motus sensuum perspiciendi sumat exordium, sed per scientiam naturae etiam futuros motus sensuum praesciens adprehendat.
And indeed the whole psalm presents itself thus: "If you truly speak righteousness, judge rightly, sons of men. For in your heart you work iniquities; on the earth your hands weave iniquity." Speaking of righteousness is common; but pursuing judgment is the zeal and habit of few. But one is to be thought truly to speak righteousness when he keeps the judgment of truth, since God judges for this not human words but the works of the heart, that is, the contrivances of thoughts. Iniquity is often not carried out for shame of public conscience; and therefore, though the hands may not have woven iniquity, yet the heart works iniquity before God on the earth. Hence adultery conceived in the heart alone is already a crime; hence, according to Paul's gospel, God judges the secrets of men, God beholding the wills of men already in the very beginnings of human birth. For since the power of a mighty nature enters not so much the fibres of the inner parts as the appetites of the mind, he must not take the beginning of his insight from the movements of the senses, but must grasp, through knowledge of nature, foreknowing even the future movements of the senses.
57.3CSEL 22:176–177
Et idcirco de his, qui conplexas manibus iniquitates corde perficiunt, continuo subiecit: alienati sunt peccatores ab utero, errauerunt a uentre, locuti sunt falsa. sic alienatus Esau ab utero est, cum maior minori seruiturus, etiam ante quam exsisteret, nuntiatur, deo futurae non nescio uoluntatis, cum et sermonis falsitas et uitae error a uentre est: ipso potius hoc sciente quam aliquo ad necessitatem genito naturamque peccati. ac ne uitium referri posset ad originem, praeduratae in his ad oboediendum uoluntatis crimen exprobrat dicens: furor illis secundum similitudinem serpentis sicut aspidis surdae et obturantis aures suas: quae non exaudit uocem incantantium, medicamenti medicati a sapiente. non excusatur quaedam necessitas naturalis in crimine. nam serpens innocens esse potuisset, cui aures per se ut surdae sint obstruuntur; uocemque incantantis non audit, eam medicata medicamina a sapiente non percipit. neque hic Marsorum cantus et consopita uiperarum sibila memorat, quia haec eadem maiore cum inertia per fidem nominis dei uirtutemque torpescunt; sed illam contumacem atque insolentem antiqui serpentis inoboedientiam docet aduersus sanctorum cantus et medicata a sapiente medicamina obsurdescentis; cui etsi cotidie, ne fallat, ne subrepat, ne mordeat, etiam sub diuini nominis denuntiatione mandetur, tamen obstructo desaeuit auditu; ex quo non oboedientes euangelio natio uiperarum sunt.
And therefore, of those who complete in the heart the iniquities woven with the hands, he at once added: "Sinners are estranged from the womb; they have gone astray from the belly; they have spoken false things." So Esau was estranged from the womb, when it was announced even before he existed that the elder would serve the younger, God not being ignorant of the future will, since both falseness of speech and error of life are from the belly; God knowing this rather than anyone being begotten to the necessity and nature of sin. And so that the fault could not be referred to origin, he reproaches the crime of a will hardened against obeying, saying: "Their fury is like that of a serpent, like a deaf asp that stops its ears, which does not hear the voice of the charmers, nor the medicine skilfully prepared by the wise." No natural necessity is excused in the crime. For the serpent could have been innocent, whose ears are stopped by itself so as to be deaf; and it does not hear the voice of the charmer and does not receive the medicines prepared by the wise. Nor does he recall here the songs of the Marsi and the lulled hissing of vipers, since these same things become numb with greater inertness through faith in the name and power of God; but he teaches that stubborn and insolent disobedience of the ancient serpent, which grows deaf to the songs of the saints and the medicines prepared by the wise; and though it is commanded daily, even under the invocation of the divine name, not to deceive, not to creep in, not to bite, yet with stopped hearing it rages; from which those who do not obey the gospel are a brood of vipers.
57.4CSEL 22:177–179
Sed quia potestas eius suorumque conteritur et omnia in his saeuitiae arma franguntur, haec subdita sunt: deus conteruit dentes eorum in ore ipsorum, molas leonum confregit dominus. spernentur uelut aqua decurrens: intendet arcum suum, donec infirmentur. sicut cera liquefacta auferentur: supercecidit ignis et non uiderunt solem. de peccatorum dentibus et molis leonum frequenter nobis fuit sermo, quia in his desaeuientis malignitatis significatur instinctus. his ergo confractis contritisque uelut decurrens aqua spernentur. omnis enim superfluentium aquarum cursus est otiosus, cum unusquisque ex his tantum, quod sibi utile putet esse, deriuet ceteris meatu transcurrente perituris, cum ad solam sui abolitionem usque ad maria deferantur. atque huius quidem in his naturae atque contemptus in psalmo alio meminit, cum loquitur: effusus sum tamquam aqua et dispersa sunt ossa mea. factum est cor meum tamquam cera liquefiens in medio uentris mei. et multa quidem, quae ex solidis in liquida soluuntur, demutant habitum sine abolitione naturae, ut ex rigentibus fluant: cera autem, si solo suscepta igni sit, sic liquescit, ut pereat. eodem nunc modo creationis utriusque in perdendis peccatoribus posuit exemplum: spernentur uelut aqua decurrens, intendet arcum suum, donec infirmentur. sicut cera liquefacta auferentur. primum ergo spernentur sine consistendi spe et manendi inutiliter defluentes; dehinc arcus domini erit, donec infirmentur, intentus; infirmati autem. liquefacti cerae modo auferentur. et in arcu seueritatem iudicii dei significari frequenter ostendimus. peccatorum hunc semper poenis his, qui punientur, intentum. et sane intento arcu, igne iudicii eos ut liquefactam ceram auferendos sequens sermo declarat: supercecidit ignis et non uiderunt solem. superiectus ergo ignis eos auferet, ne solem iustitiae contemplentur: indigni enim sunt, qui sint coheredes aeterni luminis.
But since his power and that of his followers is crushed and all their weapons of cruelty are broken, these words were added: "God has broken their teeth in their mouth; the Lord has shattered the molars of the lions. They will be despised like running water; he will bend his bow until they are weakened. Like melted wax they will be taken away; fire has fallen upon them, and they have not seen the sun." We have often spoken of the teeth of sinners and the molars of lions, since in them the impulse of raging malice is signified. When these are broken and crushed, then, they will be despised like running water. For every course of overflowing waters is useless, since each person draws off only what he thinks useful for himself, the rest running on to perish, being carried down to the seas only to their own abolition. He mentions this nature and contempt in them in another psalm too, when he says: "I am poured out like water and my bones are scattered; my heart has become like melting wax in the midst of my belly." Many things dissolved from solid into liquid change their form without abolishing their nature, so that from rigid they become fluid; but wax, if received by fire alone, melts so as to perish. In the same way he has now set an example of both created things in the destruction of sinners: "They will be despised like running water; he will bend his bow until they are weakened. Like melted wax they will be taken away." First, then, they will be despised, flowing away uselessly without hope of standing firm and remaining; then the Lord's bow will be bent until they are weakened; and weakened, they will be taken away like melted wax. And we have often shown that the severity of God's judgment is signified by the bow, always bent upon the punishments of sinners for those who will be punished. And indeed, with the bow bent, the following words declare that they are to be taken away by the fire of judgment like melted wax: "Fire has fallen upon them, and they have not seen the sun." The fire cast upon them will take them away, so that they may not behold the sun of righteousness; for they are unworthy to be co-heirs of the eternal light.
57.5CSEL 22:179–180
Ac ne id. quod tamquam cera liquefacta auferentur igne super eos, ne solem uideant, decidente, abolitionem eorum potius quam poenam significaret, adiecit: priusquam producat spinas uestras rhamnus, sicut uiuentes, sicut in ira absorbet uos. rhamnus sentium genus est, quod plures ex se condensasque spinas modo rubi ecfert; florescit autem cum ceteris uere confotum. ergo antequam rhamnus peccatorum spinas producat, ut uiuentes eos ignis in ira absorbet. neque enim suspenso adhuc iudicii tempore quiescere peccatores sine poena erat dignum: uiuentes itaque eos, cum poenae scilicet sensu, absorbet ignis, etiam antequam resurgant. corporum enim resurrectio significatur in rhamno, quae ipsa in se spinas, quibus conpungenda sunt, exhibebunt: aliis fructus aeterni floris habituris, his uero tantum ad ecferendos in se modo rhamnorum spinarum aculeos excitandis. peccatorum autem uim et dolorem significari meminimus in spina, cam dicitur: in aerumnam incidit, dum configitur spina; qui usque ad mortem humiliatus de peccato condemnauit peccatum in carne, uelut cum configens spina configitur. et unusquisque, secundum apostolum, siue bona siue mala percipiet in carne, cum ipsam materiam ac sensum, in qua conpungatur. habiturus sit peccator. ante resurrectionem carnis id est antequam spinas suas rhamnus emittat, uiuens absorbetur ad poenam anima eius secundum diuitem euangelicum punienda. quae uiuens sit.
And so that the words that they will be taken away like melted wax, the fire falling upon them so that they do not see the sun, should not signify their abolition rather than their punishment, he added: "Before your thorns produce the bramble, as living, so in anger he swallows you up." The bramble is a kind of thorn bush that puts forth many dense thorns like the briar; it blossoms when warmed in spring with the others. So before the bramble produces the thorns of sinners, fire swallows them up living in anger. For it was not fitting that, while the time of judgment is still suspended, sinners should rest without punishment; so the fire swallows them up living, that is, with the sense of punishment, even before they rise. For the resurrection of bodies is signified in the bramble, and the bodies themselves will display in themselves the thorns by which they are to be pricked: some will have the fruits of an eternal flower, but these will be raised only to bring forth in themselves the points of thorns like brambles. We remember that the force and pain of sins are signified by the thorn, when it is said, "He fell into misery while a thorn pierced him"; because he who was humbled even to death condemned sin in the flesh by means of sin, as when a thorn that pierces is pierced. And each, according to the apostle, will receive in the flesh whether good or evil, since the sinner will have the very material and sense in which to be pricked. Before the resurrection of the flesh, that is, before the bramble puts forth its thorns, his soul, which is living, is swallowed up alive for punishment, to be punished like the rich man of the Gospel.
57.6CSEL 22:180
Sed inter haec iusti cuiusque, tamquam Lazari in sinu Abrahae requiescentis, laetitia. monstratur. sequitur enim: laetabitur iustus, cum uiderit uindictam: manus suas lauabit in sanguine peccatoris. et dicet homo: sic utique erit fructus iusto? sic utique est deus iudicans eos in terra. laetitia iusti est, cum uiderit uindictam, quia peccatoribus puniendis deductum se per angelos in aeternam requiem laetatur: manus suas non peccatorum sanguine abluens, sed, cum peccatores in sanguine sint, quia rei sanguinum sunt, manus ille ab omni reatu sanguinis ablutas continebit. et idipsum psalmo alio testatus est, cum dicit: odiui congregationem malignorum et cum impiis non sedebo: lauabo inter innocentes manus meas. et commemoratis innocentiae officiis adiecit: ne perdas cum impiis animam meam et cum uiris sanguinum uitam meam. in peccatorum scilicet sanguine manus ille abluet inter innocentes. adeo autem hi uiri sanguinum sunt. ut omnium ab Abel usque ad Zachariam interfectorum ab his sanguis sit reposcendus et abluente manus suas Pilato super se suosque esse iusti sanguinem sint professi.
But amid these things the joy of every righteous man, resting like Lazarus in the bosom of Abraham, is shown. For there follows: "The righteous will rejoice when he sees vengeance; he will wash his hands in the blood of the sinner. And man will say: Is there then fruit for the righteous? There is indeed a God who judges them on the earth." The joy of the righteous is when he sees vengeance, because, while sinners are to be punished, he rejoices that he has been led by angels into eternal rest: not washing his hands in the blood of sinners, but, since sinners are in blood because they are guilty of blood, he will keep his hands washed of all guilt of blood. He testified this very thing in another psalm when he says: "I have hated the assembly of the wicked and will not sit with the ungodly; I will wash my hands among the innocent." And having recalled the duties of innocence he added: "Do not destroy my soul with the ungodly, nor my life with men of blood." In the blood of sinners, that is, he will wash his hands among the innocent. And these are men of blood to such a degree that the blood of all who were killed from Abel to Zechariah is to be required of them, and, when Pilate washed his hands, they declared that the blood of the righteous one was upon themselves and their own.
57.7CSEL 22:180–181
Sed manus suas lauante iusto atque lsetante dicet homo: an fructus erit iusto? et utique eum esse dicit, quia deus sit in terra eos iudicans. dicens ergo homo: an fructus sit iusto non ambigitur expectare iudicium, iusto tamen iam in terris, quia per angelos in Abrahae sinum deductus sit, iudicato secundum illud: qui credit in me, non iudicatur, sed transit de morte in uitam: qui autem non credit, iam iudicatus est. cum ergo sanctus non iudicandus sit, qui in uitam sit transiturus ex morte, et infidelis iam iudicatus ad poenam sit, intellegitur in eos relicum esse iudicium. qui pro gestorum qualitate inter peccata fidemque sint iudicandi per dominum nostrum Iesum Christum, qui est benedictus in saecula saeculorum. amen.
But while the righteous washes his hands and rejoices, man will say: "Will there be fruit for the righteous?" And he says that there certainly is, because God is on the earth judging them. Man, then, saying, "Is there fruit for the righteous?", undoubtedly awaits judgment; yet the righteous has already been judged on earth, since he has been led by angels into Abraham's bosom, according to that saying: "He who believes in me is not judged, but passes from death to life; but he who does not believe has already been judged." Since, then, the saint, who is to pass from death to life, is not to be judged, and the unbeliever has already been judged for punishment, it is understood that judgment remains for those who are to be judged, according to the quality of their deeds, between sins and faith, by our Lord Jesus Christ, who is blessed for ever and ever. Amen.
Tractates 58
58.1CSEL 22:181–182
Superscriptio psalmi a superiore non differt, sed psalmus eo differt, quod quaedam ex his, quae in Dauid ipsum gesta sunt, praeferuntur. cum Saul misit et custodiuit ad interficiendum eum domum eius. uerum. si ob id dirigenda ad deum esset oratio, superiora illa, id est in finem et ne disperdas uel corrumpas et in tituli inscriptione, non necesse fuerat anteferri. haec autem maxime quamquam spiritali sint distributa ratione, cum et finis legis sit Christus et corruptioni subiecta non fuerit eius aeternitas et gloriosae mortis ipsius titulus in salute sit gentium, tamen etiam ipsa, quae de gestis eius praescripta sunt, prophetica esse declarant, cum passionis dominicae ut propheta non nescius sub occasione ac tempore eorum, quae perpetiebatur, odiorum et patiendo prophetam se docuerit et loquendo. tractabimus autem psalmum, ut eorum, qui secundum litteram sapiunt intellegentiam, non grauemus: sed et ut, quod a Saul custoditus ad interficiendum est, non minus eius sit temporis prophetia, quando a populo et in Hierusalem tamquam in domo sua dominus conclusus et custoditus sit ad mortem.
The heading of the psalm does not differ from the preceding one, but the psalm differs in that certain things done to David himself are set before it: "When Saul sent and watched his house to kill him." But if the prayer were to be directed to God only for this reason, it would not have been necessary to set before it those earlier words, that is, "for the end," "do not destroy" or "do not corrupt," and "for the inscription of a title." These, however, though distributed especially by spiritual reasoning (since Christ is the end of the law, his eternity was not subjected to corruption, and the title of his glorious death is for the salvation of the nations), nevertheless declare that even the things set down about his deeds are prophetic, since David, as a prophet not ignorant of the Lord's passion, taught on the occasion and at the time of the hatreds he was suffering that he was a prophet both by suffering and by speaking. We shall treat the psalm in such a way as not to burden the understanding of those who are wise according to the letter; but also so that his being watched by Saul to be killed is no less a prophecy of that time when the Lord was shut in and watched for death by the people in Jerusalem as in his own house.
58.2CSEL 22:182–183
Eripe me de inimicis meis, domine, et ab insurgentibus in me libera me. eripe me de operantibus iniquitatem et de uiris sanguinum libera me. uitiorum humanorum causas profectusque conplexus est, ut, unde orta est et quo euaderet impietas, nosceremus. et idcirco iras et simultates et inimicitias euangelium conpressit — cum irasci sine causa fratri reatus gehennae sit et oblatio muneris nisi post reconciliationem non concessa sit simultatis et inimicos non solum diligendos, sed et pro his orandum esse decernat —, quia ex his ad uirum sanguinum peruenitur. nam primum inimici sunt; dehinc insurgunt in eum, cuius inimici sunt; insurgentes autem iniquitatis operarii sunt; postremo iniquitatis operarii usque ad uiros sanguinum profecerunt. uiros autem sanguinum non solum admissa caedis, sed et cogitata consummat
"Rescue me from my enemies, Lord, and free me from those who rise against me. Rescue me from those who work iniquity, and free me from men of blood." He has included the causes and progress of human vices, so that we might know where ungodliness arose and to what it would come. And for this reason the Gospel restrained anger, quarrels, and enmities (since being angry with a brother without cause brings the guilt of Gehenna, and the offering of a gift is not allowed except after reconciliation of a quarrel, and it decrees that enemies are not only to be loved but also prayed for), because from these one arrives at being a man of blood. For first they are enemies; then they rise against the one whose enemies they are; and rising, they are workers of iniquity; finally, workers of iniquity have advanced to being men of blood. And not only murder committed but also murder contemplated completes the man of blood.
58.3CSEL 22:183
Sequitur enim: quia captauerunt animam meam, inruerunt in me fortes. neque iniquitas mea, neque peccatum meum, domine; sine iniquitate cucurri et direxi. captata anima Dauid est, cum ad interficiendum domo clausus est. et quamquam erutus de Saul manibus sit, tamen uiri sanguinum sunt sanguinem eius optantes. sed secundum psalmi praescriptionem aduersum unum esse precationem conuenerat rege utique hoc uolente. sed orationi propheticae fuit sermo moderandus, ut querella referretur ad populum, cum captant animam fortes inruentes: quippe quos fortes armauit, qui et cor Iudae ad ministerium perditionis ingressus est. hi ergo fortes captant animam et eius animam, in quo neque iniquitas neque peccatum est, qui currens sine iniquitate direxit.
For there follows: "For they have hunted my soul; the strong have rushed upon me. Neither my iniquity nor my sin, Lord; without iniquity I ran and went straight." David's soul was hunted when he was shut in his house to be killed. And although he was rescued from Saul's hands, yet those who desired his blood are men of blood. But according to the heading of the psalm, the prayer should have been against one, since it was the king who wished it. But the prophetic prayer had to be tempered so that the complaint referred to the people, when the strong rush in and hunt the soul: for he armed them as strong who also entered Judas's heart for the ministry of destruction. These strong ones, then, hunt the soul, and the soul of him in whom there is neither iniquity nor sin, who, running without iniquity, went straight.
58.4CSEL 22:183–184
Et nescio si anterior psalmus referri in Dauid ista patitur, quo dicitur: ecce iniquitatem meam ego agnosco et peccatum meum contra me est semper. non conuenit psalmorum ordini tanta diuersitas, ut ab eodem dictum esse utrumque intellegendum sit. sed si, quia anterior confessi peccati psalmus posterior in tempore est, uideatur Dauid ante peccatum, ut peccati nescius, haec locutus, meminerimus eum sub eodem peccato de humanae necessitatis confessione dixisse: ecce enim in iniquitatibus conceptus sum et in delictis peperit me mater mea secundum illud: quis enim gloriabitur castum se habere cor coram deo nec si unius diei fuerit infans? manente in nobis etiam secundum apostolum et origine et lege peccati. non ergo conscientiae humanae uox ista conueniet.
And I do not know whether the earlier psalm allows these things to be referred to David, in which it is said: "Behold, I acknowledge my iniquity, and my sin is always before me." So great a difference does not suit the order of the psalms, so that both should be understood to have been said by the same person. But if, because the earlier psalm of confessed sin is later in time, David seems to have said these things before his sin, as one not knowing sin, let us remember that under the same sin he said, in confession of human necessity: "For behold, I was conceived in iniquities, and in sins my mother bore me"; according to that saying: "For who will boast that he has a pure heart before God, not even if he were an infant of one day?", since even according to the apostle both the origin and the law of sin remain in us. These words, then, will not suit a human conscience.
58.5CSEL 22:184
Sed uideamus, ne forte eius querellis hic abnegatae de se iniquitatis conpetat sermo, qui peccatum non fecit et in quo inuentus dolus non est, qui et dixerit: ecce ueniet princeps mundi et non inueniet in me quicquam: peccati scilicet in se calumniam non reperiendam, per quod de peccato peccatum condemnaturus esset in carne. ergo hic intellegendus est conqueri captatam animam suam et inruisse in se fortes. qui et habuit hanc querellae securitatem, ut in se neque iniquitatem neque peccatum esse profiteretur, et qui sine iniquitate cucurrisse se dixerit secundum illud: exultauit ut gigans ad currendam uiam. a summo caelo egressio eius et occursus eius usque ad summum eius.
But let us see whether these words denying iniquity of oneself do not suit the complaints of him who did no sin and in whom no deceit was found, who also said: "Behold, the prince of the world will come and will find nothing in me": that is, no charge of sin would be found in him, by which, through sin, he would condemn sin in the flesh. Here, then, he is to be understood as complaining that his soul was hunted and the strong rushed upon him; he who had this security in complaint, so as to profess that there was neither iniquity nor sin in him, and who said that he ran without iniquity, according to that saying: "He exulted like a giant to run the way. His going out is from the height of heaven, and his return to its height."
58.6CSEL 22:184–185
Hic ergo solus currens direxit, qui infirmitatis nostrae humilitate suscepta egressus caelos, regressus ad caelos, qui reuehens nos secum oblaturusque deo munus precatus sit: exsurge in occursum mihi et uide tu, domine, deus uirtutum, deus Israhel. intende ad uisitandas omnes gentes: ne miserearis omnibus, qui operantur iniquitatem. exsurgere enim sibi in occursum deum uirtutum ad uisitandas omnes gentes precatur: in eo namque coexcitatae et collocatae a dextris eius in caelestibus gentes sunt. et dignum fuit, reditum eius ambitione occursus caelestis ornari, ne ingressuro caelos dignatio paterna deesset. neque id mirum, eum primo nominis sui martyri Stephano uelut in primoribus caeli in occursum a deo patre descensum sit. uisitari itaque in occursu suo omnes gentes precatur secundum illud: neque enim misit deus filium suum in hunc mundum, ut iudicet mundum, sed ut saluus fiat mundus per ipsum. descensum namque eius in carnem et ex Maria natiuitatem laetantes angeli et patentes caeli honorauerunt. non inpudens ergo haec occursus sui oratio est, cui ad salutem gentium, sicuti et psalmo alio et apostolico testimonio continetur, primogenito ex mortuis uox occurrentis haec fuerit: filius meus es tu, ego hodie genui te. hanc itaque occursus sui significationem uisitandis in se gentibus deprecatur, non tamen iudicii seueritate praeterita, cum misericordia ab omnibus, qui iniquitatem operantur, auertitur: omnibus quidem in eo, quia caro factus est, gentibus uisitatis, sed aeque omnibus iniqua operantibus iudicatis.
He alone, then, running, went straight, who, having taken the lowliness of our weakness, went out from the heavens and returned to the heavens; who, carrying us back with him and about to offer us to God as a gift, prayed: "Arise to meet me and see, Lord God of hosts, God of Israel. Attend to visiting all the nations; have no mercy on all who work iniquity." He prays that the God of hosts arise to meet him to visit all the nations: for in him the nations have been raised together and seated at his right hand in the heavenly places. And it was fitting that his return be adorned by the honour of a heavenly meeting, so that the Father's favour should not be lacking when he was about to enter the heavens. Nor is this surprising, since God the Father came down, as it were in the forefront of heaven, to meet Stephen, the first martyr of his name. So he prays that all the nations be visited at his meeting, according to that saying: "For God did not send his Son into this world to judge the world, but that the world might be saved through him." For rejoicing angels and opened heavens honoured his descent into flesh and his birth from Mary. This prayer for a meeting, then, is not shameless, for to him, the firstborn from the dead, for the salvation of the nations, as is contained both in another psalm and in the apostolic testimony, the voice of the one who met him was this: "You are my Son, today I have begotten you." He entreats, then, this meaning of his being met for the nations to be visited in him, yet without passing over the severity of judgment, since mercy is turned away from all who work iniquity: all the nations visited in him because he became flesh, but likewise all who do iniquity judged.
58.7CSEL 22:185–186
Interiecto enim diapsalma, quae impietatem populi essent mansura, declarat. mox namque et templi desolatio et ciuitatis euersio et ipsos illos captiuitas consecuta est. quin etiam nunc ingressu ciuitatis eiusdem edicto romani regis inhibentur. et cum deserta sanctorum sancta et prophetias silere et placationum hostias deesse et dignitatem omnem deformatam ministerii leuitici recordantur, conuersi nunc et fame uerbi dei et cibi salutaris adfecti ad solacium praesentium miserarium circumire sunt soliti ciuitatem. id enim sequitur: conuertentur ad uesperam et famem patientur ut canes et circumibunt ciuitatem. famis huius tempus et per prophetam alium denuntiat deus cum dicit: ecce induco famem super terram: non famem panis, neque sitim aquae; sed famem uerbi, ut audiatur uerbum dei, inpudentiam eorum ac rabiem in nuncupatione canum arguens secundum illud: libera me de ore leonis et de manu canis unicam meam. et hunc quidem habent interioris conscientiae suae dolorem, cum se dispersos, cum captiuos, cum tributarios congemescunt, sine templo, sine sacerdote, sine regno: et hoc, posteaquam in maiestatis dominum saluatoremque mundi manus impias intulerunt.
For with a diapsalma interposed he declares what was to await the ungodliness of the people. For soon followed both the desolation of the temple, the overthrow of the city, and the captivity of the people themselves. Indeed, even now they are forbidden entry into that same city by edict of the Roman emperor. And when they remember the holy of holies deserted, the prophecies silent, the sacrifices of propitiation lacking, and all the dignity of the Levitical ministry disfigured, turned back now and afflicted with hunger for the word of God and for saving food, they are accustomed to go around the city for consolation in their present miseries. For this follows: "They will return at evening and suffer hunger like dogs and go around the city." God announces the time of this hunger through another prophet too, when he says: "Behold, I will bring a hunger upon the land: not a hunger for bread, nor a thirst for water, but a hunger for the word, that the word of God be heard"; rebuking their shamelessness and madness by calling them dogs, according to that saying: "Free my only one from the mouth of the lion and from the hand of the dog." And they have this grief of their inner conscience when they groan over being scattered, captive, tributary, without temple, without priest, without kingdom; and this after they laid ungodly hands on the Lord of majesty and Saviour of the world.
58.8CSEL 22:186
Sed ubi de peccato crucifixi unigeniti dei arguuntur, impii esse non desinunt; et dolore translatae ad gentes diuinae cognitionis adcensi ore adhuc uerbisque desaeuiunt. sequitur enim: ecce loquentur in ore suo et gladius in labiis eorum.
But when they are convicted of the sin of crucifying the only-begotten God, they do not cease to be ungodly; and, inflamed with grief that the knowledge of God has been transferred to the Gentiles, they still rage with mouth and words. For there follows: "Behold, they will speak with their mouth, and a sword is on their lips."
58.9CSEL 22:186–187
Sed hanc obtrectandi atque insectandi impietatem non solum in his, sed etiam in gentibus, quae audire detrectant, ita diuinus sermo condemnat: quoniam quis audiuit? et tu, domine, deridebis eos, pro nihilo habebis omnes gentes. nemine audiente inridentur a deo; quia, ubi dicitur: quis?, ibi aut rarus significatur aut nullus: nullus secundum illud: quis similis tibi in diis, domine? rarus autem in eo, cum dicitur: quis dabit ex Sion salutare Israhel? inridentur igitur non audientes et in quorum ore labiisque sit gladius; quia in caelis habitans deus subsannabit aduersus deum et Christum eius reges ac principes congregatos. gentes etiam omnes spernet uisitatas et non oboedientes; quia, quamuis ex his sit portio quantulacumque credentium, tamen uniuersitas reputatur in plurimis secundum illud domini dictum: numquid, cum uenerit filius hominis, inueniet fidem super terram? non quod non in aliquibus reperietur, quibus et dicetur: uenite. benedicti patris mei, possidete praeparatum uobis regnum a constitutione mundi; sed, cum pauci ex omnibus gentibus sint fideles, non per paucos efficitur, ne non omnes gentes sint infideles. inridendarum autem gentium ea maxime causa est, quod, dum crucifixum, dum mortuum, dum sepultum stultitia prudentiae saecularis exprobrat, magnae pietatis sacramentum non intellegentes filium dei resurgentem ex mortuis et maiestatis esse dominum non credunt.
But this ungodliness of disparaging and attacking is condemned by the divine word not only in them but also in the nations that refuse to hear, thus: "For who has heard? And you, Lord, will laugh at them; you will count all the nations as nothing." When no one hears, they are laughed at by God; for where "who?" is said, either a rare person or none is signified: none, according to that saying, "Who is like you among the gods, Lord?"; rare, when it is said, "Who will give out of Sion the salvation of Israel?" They are laughed at, then, who do not hear and in whose mouth and lips there is a sword; because God who dwells in the heavens will mock the kings and rulers gathered against God and his Christ. He will also spurn all the nations that were visited and did not obey; because, although from them there is some portion, however small, of believers, yet the whole is reckoned by the majority, according to the Lord's saying: "When the Son of Man comes, will he find faith on the earth?" Not that it will not be found in some, to whom it will be said, "Come, blessed of my Father, possess the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world"; but since the faithful from all nations are few, it is not brought about by the few that all nations are not unbelieving. And the chief reason the nations are to be laughed at is that, while the folly of worldly prudence reproaches him as crucified, dead, and buried, not understanding the mystery of great godliness, they do not believe that the Son of God rose from the dead and is the Lord of majesty.
58.10CSEL 22:187–188
Sed habens ille potestatem animae ponendae et animae resumendae, quia hoc mandatum accepit a patre, inrisis spretisque gentibus subiecit: fortitudinem meam ad te custodiam, quia deus susceptor meus est: deus meus, misericordia eius praeueniet me, deus meus ostendit mihi inter inimicos meos. fortitudinem suam ad deum custodiet, animam suam scilicet, quam deposuit resumendo; nemo enim auferet eam ab eo, quia uirtus sua et refugium suum sit, in cuius manibus commendauerit spiritum suum. cuius misericordia eum praeueniet, ut etiam ante resurrectionem dei filius intellegatur, cum moriente eo, obscurato sole, lux deperit, cum pendente eo in cruce tremit terra, cum descendente eo ad inferos sanctos eius inferi non tenent, cum emittente eo spiritum uelum templi tamquam custodia illinc spiritali erumpente discinditur, cum postremo centurio proclamat: uere dei filius erat iste. custodita igitur ad deum fortitudine sua, quia lux lucet in tenebris et tenebrae eam non conprehenderunt, et prseueniente eum misericordia sua ostendit ei inter inimicos eius, quia susceptor. eius esset, cum id etiam inimici confessione patuisset: uere eum dei filium esse centurio proclamat. et haec tum quidem ita cognita sunt.
But he, having power to lay down his soul and to take it up again, because he received this command from the Father, added after the nations were laughed at and spurned: "I will keep my strength for you, for God is my upholder: my God, his mercy will go before me; my God has shown me among my enemies." He will keep his strength for God, that is, his soul, which he laid down to take up again; for no one will take it from him, since God is his strength and his refuge, into whose hands he commended his spirit. His mercy will go before him, so that he is understood to be Son of God even before the resurrection: when, as he dies, the sun is darkened and light perishes; when, as he hangs on the cross, the earth trembles; when, as he descends to the underworld, the underworld does not hold his saints; when, as he gives up his spirit, the veil of the temple is torn, as though the spiritual guard were breaking out from there; when finally the centurion cries out, "Truly this was the Son of God." Having kept his strength for God, then, because the light shines in the darkness and the darkness did not overcome it, and his mercy going before him, he showed him among his enemies that he was his upholder, since this was made plain even by the confession of an enemy: the centurion proclaims that he truly is the Son of God. And these things were then known so.
58.11CSEL 22:188–190
Sed quia secundum illud: et uidebunt in quem conpunxerunt etiam in futurum inter inimicos eius ostendet deus, quod eius sit susceptor, quippe cum secundum apostolum introgressa gentium plenitudine id, quod Israhel sit relicum. saluabitur, ut quod scriptum est inpleatur: ueniet ex Sion. qui liberabit et auertet impietates ab Iacob, et hoc illis a me testamentum, cum auferam impietates eorum, ad significationem itaque repositae huius misericordise speique subiecit: ne occideris eos, ne quando obliuiscantur legis tuae: disparge illos in uirtute tua et destrue eos, protector meus domine, delicta oris eorum, sermonem labiorum ipsorum; et conprehendantur in superbia sua et de exsecratione et mendacio conuellentur in consummatione; in ira consummationis et non erunt et scient, quoniam deus dominatur Iacob finium terrae. inimici quidem propter nos, sed dilecti propter patres; misericordiae id, quod eorum est relicum, reseruatur. dispersi quidem interim circum omnes fere gentes, sed consparsione eorum sancta seque radice liberabuntur. destruentur ergo secundum prophetiam non occisi, sed dispersi et destruentur in delictis oris eorum et sermone. labiorum, cum ex Sion ueniat liberator, de quo clamauerunt: crucifige, crucifige et cui dixerunt: nos patrem habemus Abraham et rursum: quis tibi dedit hanc potestatem? et: in qua potestate haec agis? in hac igitur superbia conprehendentur, cum saluatori suo haec a se ingesta esse non cognoscant: auersaque impietate de exsecratione ac mendacio auellentur et hoc in consummatione, quia, cum intrauerit gentium plenitudo, tum quod Israhel est relicum saluabitur. in ira autem consummationis non erunt, quia impietates ex Sion ueniens auertet: non autem non erunt, qui et sunt cognituri cognoscentque, quia deus Iacob dominetur finium terrae, non iam in funiculo hereditatis et in Iacob portione noscendus, sed deus Iacob, idest, quia, qui in homine Iacob deus intellectus et uisus est, dominator sit terrse finium, quorum et creator est confitendus.
But according to that saying, "And they will look on him whom they pierced," God will show also in the future, among his enemies, that he is his upholder, since, according to the apostle, when the fullness of the Gentiles has come in, what remains of Israel will be saved, so that what is written may be fulfilled: "The deliverer will come from Sion and will turn away ungodliness from Jacob; and this will be my covenant with them, when I take away their ungodliness." To signify this mercy and hope laid up, then, he added: "Do not kill them, lest at some time they forget your law; scatter them in your power and destroy them, Lord my protector: the sins of their mouth, the word of their lips; and let them be caught in their pride, and from cursing and lying they will be torn away in the consummation; in the anger of the consummation they will not be, and they will know that God rules Jacob and the ends of the earth." Enemies indeed for our sake, but beloved for the sake of the fathers; what remains of them is reserved for mercy. Scattered meanwhile among almost all nations, yet by the holiness of their lump and their root they will be freed. They will be destroyed, then, according to the prophecy, not killed but scattered; and destroyed in the sins of their mouth and the word of their lips, when the deliverer comes from Sion, of whom they cried "Crucify, crucify," and to whom they said, "We have Abraham as father," and again, "Who gave you this authority?" and "By what authority do you do these things?" In this pride, then, they will be caught, when they do not recognize that they inflicted these things on their Saviour; and, ungodliness having been turned away, they will be torn from cursing and lying, and this in the consummation, because when the fullness of the Gentiles has come in, then what remains of Israel will be saved. In the anger of the consummation they will not be, because he who comes from Sion will turn away their ungodliness; yet they will not cease to be, they who are to know and will know that the God of Jacob rules the ends of the earth: no longer known in the measuring line of the inheritance and in the portion of Jacob, but the God of Jacob, that is, he who was understood and seen as God in a man by Jacob, is ruler of the ends of the earth, of which he is also to be confessed creator.
58.12CSEL 22:190–191
Sed illos interim desolationis ac dispersionis suae manet poena. nam etsi consummationi temporum propter patres et electos haec dispensatio misericordise reseruetur, interiecto tamen diapsalma, quid in eos interim repetita significatione constitutum fuerit, ostenditur. sequitur enim: et conuertentur in uesperum et famem patientur ut canes et circumibunt ciuitatem. ipsi dispergentur ad manducandum: si autem non saturabuntur, et murmurabunt. amissa ciuitate temploque deserto et secundum romani regis edicta circumeuntes tantum, non etiam ineuntes ciuitatem famis eos non huius panis et cibi, sed oblationum, hostiarum et uisionum, quibus omnibus saturabantur, adficiet, aduersum custodem suum canum inprobitate latrantes. et dispergentur ad manducandum: quia per diuersa speciem sacerdotii illius legitimi et holocausti et circumcisionis imitantur, cum hsec tantum non nisi intra Hierosolymam sint legitima constituta. sed ad manducandum dispersi non saturantur. non enim nisi sanctis et deo placitis et loci ipsius ac templi constitutione religiosis sollemnitatibus explebuntur. sed adhuc ei murmurabunt: ne hac quidem fame festiuitatum suarum edomiti, ut secundum murmur, quo in deserto deum exacerbauerunt, psenitentise quiete resipiscant.
But meanwhile the punishment of their desolation and dispersion awaits them. For although this dispensation of mercy is reserved for the consummation of the times for the sake of the fathers and the elect, yet with a diapsalma interposed it is shown, by a repeated meaning, what has been appointed for them meanwhile. For there follows: "And they will return at evening and suffer hunger like dogs and go around the city. They will be scattered to eat; and if they are not filled, they will also murmur." The city lost and the temple deserted, and, according to the edicts of the Roman emperor, going only around the city and not entering it, hunger will afflict them, not for this bread and food, but for the offerings, sacrifices, and visions with which they used to be filled, barking with the shamelessness of dogs against their guardian. And they will be scattered to eat: because in different places they imitate the appearance of that lawful priesthood, of burnt offering and circumcision, although these were established as lawful only within Jerusalem. But scattered to eat, they are not filled. For they will be satisfied only by the solemnities that are holy and pleasing to God and religious by the constitution of that place and temple. But they will murmur still, not tamed even by this hunger for their festivals, so as to come to their senses in the quiet of repentance, as after the murmuring with which they provoked God in the desert.
58.13CSEL 22:191
Sed inter haec spes omnes suas et gratulationes psalmi fine concludit dicens: ego autem cantabo uirtuti tuae. exaltabo mane misericordiam tuam: quia factus es susceptor meus et refugium meum in die tribulationis mese. adiutor meus tibi psallam: quia deus susceptor meus, deus meus misericordia mea. et ista quidem omnia possunt ad prophetae gratulationem referri: sed neque a domini sunt confessione diuersa. haec enim eorum dispersio passionis impietatem est consecuta. sed quod in misericordia dei mane, quia susceptor et refugium eius factus est, exultaturus est, uidetur id ad resurrectionis tempus esse referendum; quia, cum omni tempore laus dei cantanda sit a propheta, resurgenti tamen ex mortuis diluculo in cselosque redituro exultatio matutinae gratulationis est propria, domino nostro testi Christo, qui est benedictus in saecula saeculorum. amen.
But amid these things he concludes all his hopes and thanksgivings at the end of the psalm, saying: "But I will sing to your strength; I will exalt your mercy in the morning, for you have become my upholder and my refuge in the day of my tribulation. My helper, to you I will sing psalms, for God is my upholder, my God my mercy." All these can be referred to the prophet's thanksgiving; but neither are they different from the Lord's confession. For this dispersion of theirs followed the ungodliness of the passion. But that he will exult in the morning in the mercy of God, because he has become his upholder and refuge, seems to be referred to the time of the resurrection; because, although the praise of God is to be sung by the prophet at every time, yet the exultation of morning thanksgiving belongs properly to him who rose from the dead at dawn and was to return to the heavens, our Lord, the witness, Christ, who is blessed for ever and ever. Amen.
Tractates 59
59.1CSEL 22:191–193
Multa in psalmo ante rerum gesta praescripta sunt, quae necesse est ad alicuius intellegentiae significationem his, que effectu sunt, anteferri: cum in finem, cum pro his, qui demutabuntur, cum tituli inscriptio, cum in doctrinam Dauid superscriptio conprehendit. post quse gestorum tempus adscribitur: succendit Mesopotamiam et Syriam Sobal, et conuertit loab et percussit uallem Salinarum duodecim milia. quo psalmus omnis ab historia dissentit. nam cum Sobal percussit cum Mesopotamia et Syria, quae ab eodem ad bellum commota et accensa et capta est, hanc maximi belli uictoriam ingens gratulationis laetitia consecuta est. psalmus autem totus tristis et msestus est, cum super repulso detractoque populo dolor est, cum commotae turbatseque terrae querella est, cum sanandse contritionis eius oratio est. deinde id, quod in Salinarum ualle memoratum est, neque in historia, neque in aliquorum translatorum intellegentia. est. nam secundum Aquilam, qui translator legis ludseis post passionem domini fuit, ita scribitur: cum percussit ualles. sed hic secundum litteram scribens et extra spiritalem intellegentiam manens belli locum edidit. translatio autem illa seniorum septuaginta et legitima et spiritalis, ante passionem domini gestaque suscepta, per nominum naturarumque species nunc quoque, ut in omnibus psalmis, causam sensumque manifestat, in commemoratione gestorum non argumentum psalmi, sed tempus ostendens: ne ob id, quod continetur in gestis, sed ut tum, cum ea gesta sunt, scriptus esse noscatur.
Many things are set in the psalm before the events, which must be placed before the deeds to signify some understanding: since the heading includes "for the end," "for those who will be changed," "inscription of a title," and "for the teaching of David." After these the time of the events is added: "When he burned Mesopotamia and Syria Sobal, and Joab returned and struck the valley of Salt, twelve thousand." In this the whole psalm disagrees with the history. For when he struck Sobal together with Mesopotamia and Syria, which were stirred up, kindled, and taken by him for war, immense joy of thanksgiving followed the victory of this very great war. But the whole psalm is sad and sorrowful, since there is grief over a people rejected and pulled down, complaint over the earth shaken and troubled, and prayer for the healing of its brokenness. Further, what is mentioned of the valley of Salt is neither in the history nor in the understanding of some translators. For according to Aquila, who was the translator of the law for the Jews after the Lord's passion, it is written thus: "when he struck the valleys." But he, writing according to the letter and remaining outside spiritual understanding, gave the place of the battle. That translation of the seventy elders, however, both lawful and spiritual, undertaken before the Lord's passion and deeds, here too, as in all the psalms, makes the cause and sense plain through the forms of names and natures, showing in the record of events not the subject of the psalm but its time: so that it is known to have been written not because of what is contained in the events, but at the time when they took place.
59.2CSEL 22:193–194
Sed antequam de tempore loquimur prophetise, quia multum ad intellegentiam psalmi proficit scire, quando sit scriptus, de superscriptione tractemus, quae intellegenda refertur ad finem et his, qui inmutabuntur: qui ex impietate scilicet ac uitiis desinentes ad religionem atque innocentiam transferentur et ex peccatis synagogae ad ecclesiae gratiam demutabuntur, sicut in eo psalmo, qui primus pro his, qui inmutabuntur, est scriptus, ostendimus, cum dicitur: audi filia et uide et inclina aurem tuam et obliuiscere populum tuum et domum patris tui; quoniam concupiuit rex speciem tuam; et rursum in eodem: pro patribus. tuis facti sunt tibi filii, constitues eos principes super omnem terram. filiorum itaque demutatione facta pro patribus paternam domum obliuiscitur, deo regi magis regina placitura, cuius morte renouatur ad uitam. et idcirco tituli inscriptio pro his, qui inmutabuntur, adscribitur, gloriam mortis eius, qui pro omnibus mortuus, tituli inscriptione testante, et testante ad doctrinam Dauid, ut omnes eum Dauid, qui et oriens et iustus et rex aeternus est, nouerimus; qui inimicas nobis infestasque uirtutes cum duce suo peremit, omnibus his, qui aduersum nos uitiorum bella accendere erant soliti, extinctis: non in ualle planctus. neque in ualle tabernaculorum, sed in ualle salium; id enim magis quam salinarum graecus sermo declarat, cum ex se iam non flebiles habitationes nec lamentanda tabernacula, sed salem potius haec mundi huius uallis exhibeat, eos scilicet eorumque similes, quibus dictum est: uos estis sal terrse, in quibus maxime anticus ille nosque incendens hostis extinctus est. pro his igitur in fine commutandis et sub testimonio ac tituli inscriptione ad Dauid edocendis psalmus hic scribitur, non alio tempore, quam cum Nathan propheta throni aeterni regem ex Dauid semine nuntiauit. in eo enim tempore haec, quae in rebus gestis prsescribuntur, effecta sunt, in quo prophetia aeterni regis ostensa est. intellegendus ergo psalmus pro his est, qui inmutabuntur, in Dauid aeternum regem edocendis, et qui pro amissis patribus erunt ex commutatione iam filii. ita enim coepit:
But before we speak of the time of the prophecy, since it greatly helps the understanding of the psalm to know when it was written, let us treat the heading, which is to be understood as referring to the end and "to those who will be changed": those, namely, who, ceasing from ungodliness and vices, will be transferred to religion and innocence and will be changed from the sins of the synagogue to the grace of the church; as we showed in the psalm that was first written "for those who will be changed," when it is said: "Hear, daughter, and see, and incline your ear, and forget your people and your father's house, for the king has desired your beauty"; and again in the same: "In place of your fathers sons have been born to you; you will make them princes over all the earth." So, a change of sons having been made in place of fathers, she forgets her father's house, the queen about to please God the king more, by whose death she is renewed to life. And therefore the inscription of a title is added "for those who will be changed," the inscription of the title bearing witness to the glory of the death of him who died for all, and bearing witness "for the teaching of David," so that we may all know him as David, who is both the dayspring and the just one and the eternal king; who destroyed the powers hostile and dangerous to us together with their leader, all those being extinguished who used to kindle the wars of vices against us: not in the valley of lamentation, nor in the valley of tabernacles, but in the valley of salt; for the Greek expresses this rather than "salt pits," since this valley of the world now displays from itself not tearful dwellings nor lamentable tabernacles but rather salt, namely those and their like to whom it was said, "You are the salt of the earth," in whom above all that ancient enemy who burned us has been extinguished. For those, then, who are to be changed at the end and to be taught about David under the testimony and inscription of the title, this psalm is written, and at no other time than when the prophet Nathan announced a king of the eternal throne from the seed of David. For at that time the things recorded in the events were accomplished, at which the prophecy of the eternal king was shown. The psalm, then, is to be understood as for those who will be changed, who are to be taught about David the eternal king, and who in place of lost fathers will by the change already be sons. For it began thus:
59.3CSEL 22:194–195
Deus, reppulisti nos et destruxisti nos: iratus es et misertus es nobis. commouisti terram et conturbasti eam: sana contritiones eius, quia mota est. ostendisti populo tuo dura, potasti nos uino conpunctionis. dedisti metuentibus te significationem, ut fugiant a facie arcus. secundum communem saeculi sensum irse miserationique non conuenit, neque ipsius in eosdem uterque hic idem conueniet adfectus, ut ultionis uoluntati uoluntas miserationis admixta sit. solis autem hoc patribus pie irascentibus congruit, ut misericors eorum ira in peccatis sit filiorum, secundum etiam illud beati Pauli. cum ita Satanae in interitum carnis tradit, ut spiritus saluus sit in die domini, uindictae praesentis seueritatem ad salutem spiritus proficere demonstrans. seternus ergo ille et caelestis omnibus pater, qui et dixit: ego occidam et ego sanabo, sic repellit et destruit suos, ut misereatur iratus. destruxit enim Hierusalem templum, sed caelestem sanctis reddidit ciuitatem; reppulit ab operationibus legis, sed iustificationem fidei iustificans ex fide impium tribuit; dissoluit terrestre regnum, sed reges constituit caelorum. ita iram misericordia consecuta est, dum damno terrenorum praesentium ingens aeternorum bonorum retributio repensatur.
"God, you have rejected us and destroyed us; you have been angry and have had mercy on us. You have shaken the earth and troubled it; heal its breaches, for it has been moved. You have shown your people hard things; you have given us to drink the wine of compunction. You have given those who fear you a sign, that they may flee from the face of the bow." According to the common sense of the world, anger and mercy do not agree, nor will both these feelings agree in the same person toward the same people, so that the will to mercy is mixed with the will to vengeance. This befits only fathers who are piously angry, that their anger at the sins of their sons is merciful; as also in that saying of blessed Paul, when he hands someone over to Satan for the destruction of the flesh so that the spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord, showing that the severity of present punishment serves the salvation of the spirit. That eternal and heavenly Father of all, then, who also said, "I will kill and I will heal," so rejects and destroys his own as to have mercy while angry. For he destroyed the temple of Jerusalem but gave the saints the heavenly city; he rejected them from the works of the law but bestowed the justification of faith, justifying the ungodly by faith; he dissolved the earthly kingdom but established kings of the heavens. So mercy followed anger, since an immense recompense of eternal goods makes up for the loss of present earthly things.
59.4CSEL 22:195–196
Et hsec quidem non magis ad Israhel, quam ad uniuersitatem humani generis aptata sunt; quia ex uno in omnes sententia. mortis et uitse labor exiit, cum dictum est: maledicta terra in operibus tuis, nunc autem per unum in omnes donum uitse et iustificationis gratia abundauit, ut quorum terra maledicta est, horum nunc conformia deo corpora sint, et quae commota metu et ignoratione turbata et labore contrita est et ipso illo lsetificantis uini conpuncta potu. nunc susceptae significationis secura uirtute futurae irae defugiat potestatem. in arcu enim, ut frequenter tractauimus, praeparatae ad p“nam impiis irse terror ostenditur secundum illud: numquid irascetur per singulos dies? arcum suum tetendit et parauit eum et in eo parauit uasa mortis, sagittas suas arsuris operatus est. metuentibus igitur significationem dedit uel signi in frontibus, uel fidei in cordibus, uel testimonii in operibus, uel glorise in confessionibus, uel uictorise in martyribus. ut a facie arcus irseque fugiatur, ut dictum est: natio uiperarum, quis monstrauit uobis fugere ab ira uentura? gratulantis igitur humani generis haec uox est post regnum mortis, post diaboli terrores, post laborum peccatorumque onera, post infelicis laetitiae dolorem, quia uitiorum gaudia, cum sint intellecta, conpungunt. in uino enim secundum apostolum lasciuia est. et sicut est uinum cor hominis laetificans, ita et uinum est cor hominis conpungens. nam et calix irse est, sicuti et calix uitae est.
And these things are adapted no more to Israel than to the whole human race; for from one the sentence of death and the toil of life went out to all, when it was said, "Cursed is the earth in your works"; but now through one the gift of life and the grace of justification has abounded to all, so that those whose earth was cursed now have bodies conformed to God; and the earth that was shaken by fear, troubled by ignorance, broken by toil, and pricked by the very drinking of gladdening wine, now, by the secure power of the sign it has received, flees the power of the coming anger. For in the bow, as we have often discussed, the terror of the anger prepared for punishment of the ungodly is shown, according to the saying: "Will he be angry every day? He has bent his bow and made it ready, and on it he has prepared the instruments of death; he has made his arrows for those who will burn." To those who fear him, then, he has given a sign: of the seal on foreheads, or of faith in hearts, or of testimony in works, or of glory in confessions, or of victory in martyrs; so that one may flee from the face of the bow and of anger, as it was said, "Brood of vipers, who showed you to flee from the coming anger?" This, then, is the voice of the human race giving thanks after the reign of death, after the terrors of the devil, after the burdens of toil and sins, after the pain of unhappy gladness; for the joys of vices, when they are understood, prick the heart. For according to the apostle, in wine is debauchery. And as there is a wine that gladdens the heart of man, so there is also a wine that pricks the heart of man. For there is a cup of anger, just as there is a cup of life.
59.5CSEL 22:196
Post haec ergo et post hoc uini conpunctionis uinum significatione fugiendi arcus iraeque concessa uniuersitas fidelium aeternis spebus exultat. id enim mox diapsalma interueniente declarat: ut liberentur dilecti tui, salua dextera tua et exaudi me. — dextera domini fecit uirtutem et a dextris deo uirtus dei coexcitata secum humilitatis nostrae carne consedit. data ergo significatione fugiendi a facie arcus liberantur dilecti et per dei dexteram saluantur. et a qua facie arcus liberentur saluenturque, apostolus docuit dicens: qui liberauit nos de potestate tenebrarum et transtulit in regnum filii dilectionis suae. liberandi ergo dilecti saluandique per dexteram dei sunt.
After these things, then, and after this wine of compunction, the sign of fleeing the bow and anger having been granted, the whole body of the faithful exults in eternal hopes. For this the diapsalma that soon intervenes declares: "That your beloved may be freed, save with your right hand and hear me." The right hand of the Lord has done mightily, and the power of God, raised at God's right hand, has sat down with him in the flesh of our lowliness. When the sign of fleeing from the face of the bow has been given, then, the beloved are freed and saved through God's right hand. And from what face of the bow they are freed and saved, the apostle taught, saying: "Who has freed us from the power of darkness and transferred us into the kingdom of the Son of his love." The beloved, then, are to be freed and saved through the right hand of God.
59.6CSEL 22:196–198
Sed salutis huius ad fidei firmitatem noscenda est prophetia. sequitur enim: deus locutus est in sancto suo: laetabor et partibor Sicimam et conuallem tabernaculorum dimetibor. meus est Galaad et meus est Manasses et Ephrsem fortitudo capitis mei, Iuda rex meus, Moab olla spei mese. in Idumseam extendam calciamentum meum: mihi allophyli subditi sunt. in sancto deus locutus est, in eo nempe, cui etiam dsemones clamant: scimus, quia tu sanctus dei es et de quo angelus euangelizat: et quod ex te nascetur sanctum, uocabitur filius dei. in hoc itaque sancto locutus est, cum dicit: pater, qui in me loquitur, ipse facit opera sua. locutus ergo in sancto deus in principio sermonis exultat. exultabit enim ut gigans ad currendam uiam, exultabit in Sicima partienda. Sicima Samaria est, quae eadem et Sichem est, quam Iacob Ioseph filio suo sub benedictione spiritus deputauit, haec, cum omnibus antea legis temporibus in impietate mansisset, euangelium domini ex parte suscipiens: nam hodieque pars eius inreligiosissimis studiis de studio uetere detinetur: illic enim uaccae adoratae, illic mons relicto sacrario electus. illic regnum aduersum ludam excitatum. sed eodem primum dominus accedens etiam credente Samaritana et aquae uiuse potum precante fidem intulit; mox etiam apostolis praedicantibus participes sancti spiritus facti sunt. partita ergo Sicima est, cum fideles ab infidelibus separantur. et est futuri iudicii ista diuisio, sicut scriptum est: ueniet dominus serui illius in die, qua non sperat, et hora, qua ignorat: et diuidet eum partemque eius ponet cum hypocritis. diuisa ergo Samaria est uel iudicio, uel fide secundum illud: non ueni pacem mittere in terram. sed diuisionem.
But for the firmness of faith the prophecy of this salvation must be known. For there follows: "God has spoken in his holy one: I will rejoice and divide Sicima and measure out the valley of tabernacles. Galaad is mine and Manasses is mine, and Ephraim is the strength of my head, Judah my king, Moab the pot of my hope. Into Idumea I will stretch out my shoe; the foreigners are subject to me." God has spoken in the holy one, namely in him to whom even demons cry out, "We know that you are the holy one of God," and of whom the angel announces, "And the holy one that will be born of you will be called the Son of God." In this holy one, then, he spoke, when he says: "The Father who speaks in me does his works himself." God, then, having spoken in the holy one, exults at the beginning of the discourse. For he will exult like a giant to run his way; he will exult in dividing Sicima. Sicima is Samaria, which is also Sichem, which Jacob assigned to his son Joseph under the blessing of the Spirit. Having remained in ungodliness through all the earlier times of the law, it received the Lord's gospel in part; for even today part of it is held by most irreligious pursuits from its old devotion: for there heifers were worshipped, there a mountain was chosen and the sanctuary abandoned, there a kingdom was raised against Judah. But the Lord, coming there first, brought faith even when the Samaritan woman believed and asked for a drink of living water; and soon, when the apostles preached, they became sharers in the Holy Spirit. Sicima was divided, then, when the faithful are separated from the unfaithful. And this division belongs to the future judgment, as it is written: "The lord of that servant will come on a day when he does not expect and at an hour he does not know, and will divide him and set his portion with the hypocrites." Samaria was divided, then, either by judgment or by faith, according to the saying: "I came not to send peace on the earth, but division."
59.7CSEL 22:198
Neque solum loquens in sancto deus Sicimam partitus est, sed etiam conuallem tabernaculorum dimensus est, hanc siquidem habitationis humanae demersam humilemque sedem. quam et alio loco ob segritudines uitse ac lamentationes calamitatum uallem planctus esse commemorat dicens: deposuerunt in ualle plorationis; dimensus ergo hanc est, quia. gentium plenitudo spectatur. et ubi modus est credentium futurus, illic dimensionis examen est, partem intra ecclesiam congregandis, parte alia in eadem ualle residentibus.
And God, speaking in the holy one, not only divided Sicima but also measured out the valley of tabernacles, that sunken and lowly seat of human dwelling, which in another place, because of the sicknesses of life and the laments of calamities, he calls the valley of lamentation, saying: "They placed in the valley of weeping." He measured it out, then, because the fullness of the Gentiles is awaited. And where there will be a measure of believers, there is the testing of measurement, one part to be gathered within the church, another part remaining in the same valley.
59.8CSEL 22:198–199
Quisque autem aliqua metitur, necesse est ut ea. quse sua sunt, metiatur. suus enim est Galaad et suus est Manasses. mons iste Phoenicum est Arabiae Mesopotamiseque contiguus, ex parte Manasse in possessionem deputatus: et ideo et suus est Manasses, sub Manasses nomine terrse plenitudinem, sicuti et sub Galaad omnem orbem suum esse demonstrans. sed in his usurpandis nihil praeter ius proprietatis ostensum est.
Whoever measures things must measure what is his own. For Galaad is his and Manasses is his. That mountain is near Phoenicia and borders Arabia and Mesopotamia, assigned in part as Manasseh's possession; and therefore Manasses too is his, showing under the name of Manasses the fullness of the earth, as under Galaad the whole world, to be his. But in claiming these nothing is shown except the right of ownership.
59.9CSEL 22:199
Ephrem autem adsumptio capitis eius et Iuda rex eius est. haec sanctus loquente in se deo loquitur, qui et per Iacob Ephrem conuersa manuum sanctificatione benedixerit et regem ei Iuda, qui et expectatio gentium futurus esset, ostenderit. adsumptio ergo Ephrem est, non etiam Manasses, cum Ioseph uterque sit filius. sed cum in capite significatio contineatur et corporis secundum illud: de torrente in uia bibet, propterea exaltabit caput et omnis sanctus caput est corporis Christi, idcirco adsumptio capitis eius Ephrem est, quia contra generationum ordinem ad praeferendam ecclesise sanctificationem in praelato Ephrem et postposito Manasse minor maiori est antelatus. adsumptio itaque capitis sui est Ephrem, id est populi, quem in Ephrem prsefigurauit. uel potius ecclesia in corpus adsumitur.
Ephraim is the taking up of his head and Judah is his king. The holy one says these things, God speaking in him, who also through Jacob blessed Ephraim with a crossing of his sanctifying hands, and showed him Judah as king, who was to be the expectation of the nations. The taking up, then, is of Ephraim, not also of Manasseh, though both are sons of Joseph. But since the head also contains the meaning of the body, according to that saying, "He will drink from the brook on the way; therefore he will lift up his head," and every holy one is the head of the body of Christ, therefore Ephraim is the taking up of his head, because, against the order of birth, to show beforehand the sanctification of the church, the younger was preferred to the elder in Ephraim set first and Manasseh set after. So Ephraim is the taking up of his head, that is, of the people whom he prefigured in Ephraim; or rather, the church is taken up into the body.
59.10CSEL 22:199–200
Iuda etiam rex meus est, id est a se dispositus et electus. non utique uel Dauid ipsi rex Iuda est, cum ex Iuda rex ipse sit primus, uel loquenti in sancto suo deo rex est, sed loqui hsec sanctus iste, in quo deus loquitur, intellegendus est, qui et spiritu Iacob repleuerit ad seterni regis istius prophetiam, cum ait: non deficiet princeps de Iuda, nec dux de femoribus eius, donec ueniat semen, cui repositum est, et ipsum est expectatio gentium.
"Judah also is my king," that is, arranged and chosen by him. Judah is certainly not king to David himself, since he himself is the first king from Judah; nor is he king to God speaking in his holy one; but this holy one in whom God speaks is to be understood as saying these things, he who also filled Jacob with the Spirit for the prophecy of this eternal king, when he said: "A ruler shall not fail from Judah, nor a leader from his thighs, until the seed comes for whom it is laid up, and he is the expectation of the nations."
59.11CSEL 22:200
Et quia non solum ex hac generatione sanctorum, sed etiam ex peccatorum origine huic dei sancto carnis esset ineunda susceptio. quia in similitudine carnis peccati deus filium suum misit, idcirco etiam Moab olla spei eius est. et hsec quidem Moab generatio secundum eam, quse in Genesi sententia est, diuinse maledictionis suscepit opprobrium. sed post decem generationes per gradus successionis sancto digna fit genere: sanctusque hic ex Iuda et ex Moab originem sumens, decocta tamquam per ollam carnis cruditate, in speciem cibi significatur aeterni, cum caro eius uere cibus uitae sit. est et olla secundum Hieremiam urens peccata atque tollens; sicuti et dominus ipse mittere ignem uenit super terram et multi secundum apostolum tamquam per ignem erunt salui, cum defsecatis et perastis uitiis, ut argentum ignitum, probabiles iudicentur. hinc ergo Moab spei suae olla est. cui etiam ex Moab, cruda utique atque uitiosa, iam caelestis illa ad cibum uitse sanctificatio carnis in spe est.
And since this holy one of God was to take up flesh not only from this lineage of saints but also from an origin of sinners, because God sent his Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, therefore Moab too is the pot of his hope. This lineage of Moab, according to the sentence in Genesis, received the disgrace of divine curse. But after ten generations, through the steps of succession, it becomes worthy of the holy lineage; and this holy one, taking his origin from Judah and from Moab, the rawness of the flesh boiled away as in a pot, is signified as the appearance of eternal food, since his flesh is truly the food of life. There is also a pot, according to Jeremiah, burning and taking away sins; just as the Lord himself came to send fire on the earth, and many, according to the apostle, will be saved as through fire, when, their vices refined and burned off, they are judged approved like silver tried by fire. Hence Moab is the pot of his hope, to whom even from Moab, though raw and faulty, that heavenly sanctification of the flesh for the food of life is now in hope.
59.12CSEL 22:200–201
Quin etiam usque in Idumseam calciamentum suum extensurum esse se dicit, scilicet usque ad defectionem Esau: quia Idumsea, quae sedis est Esau. prsedicationis apostolicse dirigat gressum. speciosi enim pedes euangelizantium sunt: et in calciamento pedes. in pedibus autem gressus ostenditur. neque solum in Idumseam cursum praedicationis extendet. sed etiam allophyli subditi sunt secundum illud: exaudi. deus, orationem, ad te omnis caro ueniet; quia deo dignum sit gentes ei omnes esse subiectas et uniuersitatem carnis ad confessionem aeternae huius misericordiae erudiri.
Indeed, he says he will stretch out his shoe even into Idumea, that is, even to the failing of Esau; because Idumea, which is the seat of Esau, would direct the steps of the apostolic preaching. For beautiful are the feet of those who bring good news; and the feet are in the shoe, and in the feet the step is shown. And he will stretch the course of preaching not only into Idumea, but also the foreigners are subject, according to the saying: "Hear, God, the prayer; to you all flesh will come"; because it is worthy of God that all nations be subject to him and that all flesh be taught to confess this eternal mercy.
59.13CSEL 22:201–202
Sed cognitis his, qui inmutabuntur, secundum tituli inscriptionem et doctrina eius, qui Dauid est seternus, accepta aeternam illam primitiuorum in caelis Hierusalem et circumstantium deo sanctorum ciuitatem ingredi propheta festinat. ducem, qui se eo deducat, expectans. sequitur enim: quis deducet me in ciuitatem circumstantise? quis deducet me usque in Idumaeam? nonne tu, deus, qui reppulisti nos et non egredieris deus in uirtutibus nostris? Esau defectio est et Edom secundum Genesim deficiens est; et secundum apostolum, quod est relicum Israhel, saluandum est. optans ergo propheta in ciuitatem circumstantiae deduci scit se ante usque in Idumseam esse uenturum, id est in illam defectionem populi anterioris, qua maior seruiet minori. et ultima prsedicatio conuertet corda patrum ad filios, cum ueniens ex Sion peccata et impietates ab Iacob auferat. sed hic idem deducet, qui et ob impietatem ante destruxit et reppulit, qui capta Hierusalem destitutoque regno indignos spretosque deseruit, solitus ante eos spiritalibus auxiliis confouere et caelesti militia aduersum inimicorum bella tutari. nunc autem deserente eos custodia spiritus sancti nullum in uirtutibus eorum. id est in exercitibus diuinse propugnationis auxilium est. et ideo, quia destruxit, non egredietur in uirtutibus eorum.
But having learned of those who will be changed, according to the inscription of the title, and having received the teaching of him who is the eternal David, the prophet hastens to enter that eternal Jerusalem of the firstborn in the heavens and the city of the saints who stand around God, awaiting a leader to lead him there. For there follows: "Who will lead me into the city of encirclement? Who will lead me even to Idumea? Will it not be you, God, who rejected us, and will you not go out, God, with our forces?" Esau is failing, and Edom according to Genesis is "one who fails"; and according to the apostle what remains of Israel is to be saved. The prophet, then, wishing to be led into the city of encirclement, knows that he will first come even to Idumea, that is, to that failing of the earlier people by which the elder will serve the younger. And the last preaching will turn the hearts of the fathers to the sons, when the one coming from Sion takes away sins and ungodliness from Jacob. But the same one will lead who before destroyed and rejected them for ungodliness, who, when Jerusalem was taken and the kingdom abandoned, deserted them as unworthy and spurned, though he used to cherish them before with spiritual help and protect them with heavenly hosts against the wars of enemies. But now, since the guard of the Holy Spirit has deserted them, there is no help in their forces, that is, in the hosts of divine defence. And therefore, because he destroyed them, he will not go out with their forces.
59.14CSEL 22:202–203
Sed repositae spei, quia quod Israhel est relicum saluabit. misericordiam propheta non tacuit dicens: da nobis auxilium de tribulatione et uana salus hominis. in deo faciemus uirtutem et ipse ad nihilum deducet tribulantes nos. scit uanam salutem esse, quae ab hominibus speratur, quia et uitse huius usus sine misericordia dei nullus sit secundum illud: melior misericordia tua super uitam, quia, nisi ad profectum seternitatis uita suscepta sit, miseriarum in nobis potius erit origo, non uitae. auxilium itaque a deo in tribulationibus sperat, quia hominum salus uana sit. postulat ergo de tribulatione auxilium in deo uirtutes concesso auxilio facturus: cum liberati omnes a lege peccati in dei potius iustificatione maneamus, cum pugnam non aduersus carnem et sanguinem, sed aduersum spiritales nequitias et mundi potentes, deo satanam ipso spiritu oris sui interficiente, peragamus, cum non regnet iam in inmortali corpore nostro tribulans nos ante peccatum, cum absorbeatur mors a uita in contentione uictorise per dominum nostrum Iesum Christum, qui est benedictus in saecula sseculorum. amen.
But the prophet did not keep silent about the mercy of the hope laid up, since he will save what remains of Israel, saying: "Give us help from tribulation, for vain is the salvation of man. In God we shall do mightily, and he will bring to nothing those who afflict us." He knows that the salvation hoped for from men is vain, because there is no use of this life without God's mercy, according to the saying, "Your mercy is better than life"; because unless life is undertaken for the advance of eternity, it will be in us rather the origin of miseries than of life. So he hopes for help from God in tribulations, because the salvation of men is vain. He asks, then, for help from tribulation, about to do mightily in God when help is granted: when, all freed from the law of sin, we remain rather in the justification of God; when we carry on the fight not against flesh and blood but against spiritual wickedness and the powers of the world, God himself killing Satan with the breath of his mouth; when he who afflicted us before, sin, no longer reigns in our immortal body; when death is swallowed up by life in the contest of victory, through our Lord Jesus Christ, who is blessed for ever and ever. Amen.
Tractates 60
60.1CSEL 22:203
Simplex est psalmus aeternae gratulationis continens prophetiam. nam neque res gestas neque significationis alicuius cognomenta superscriptio conprehendit: tantum hymnus in finem est, ut id, quod a propheta cantatum est, in fine uel psalmi uel temporum explicandum esse noscatur. oratio autem est iusti aeterna sperantis seseque in Christo coexcitatum in caelestibus gratulantis. c“pit enim ita:
The psalm is simple, containing the prophecy of eternal thanksgiving. For the heading includes neither events nor names with any significance: it is only "a hymn for the end," so that what was sung by the prophet is known to be explained at the end either of the psalm or of the times. It is the prayer of a righteous man who hopes for eternal things and gives thanks that he has been raised together with Christ in the heavenly places. For it began thus:
60.2CSEL 22:203–204
Exaudi, deus, orationem meam, intende deprecationi mese. a finibus terrae ad te clamaui, dum anxiaretur cor meum. exaudiri precationem suam sanctus hic postulat, cuius et ea fiducia est, ut in orationem suam uelit intendi, utrum sit innocens, casta et fidelis et ex intimo conscientise atque cordis metu profecta, quia secundum apostolum et corde credendum et ore confitendum sit ad salutem. intendendse autem orationis hinc precatio est, quod, dum corde anxio est, a terra. finibus clamauerit. non hic extima solitudinum aut contigua oceani incolebat, qui a terrse finibus anxio corde clamabat; sed sciens se in carne quidem, quae terra est. degentem iam in fine carnis habitare, dum secundum Paulum habitans in corpore peregrinatur a corpore, dum uiuens iam non sibi uiuit neque ipse uiuit, sed uiuit in eo Christus, congemescens tamen in hoc suo habitaculo superuestirique festinans et ideo anxio corde a terrse finibus clamat, quia et necessitatem habeat in carne uiuendi et spem teneat a carnis uitiis desinendi dicens:
"Hear, God, my prayer; attend to my supplication. From the ends of the earth I have cried to you, while my heart was in anguish." This holy one asks that his prayer be heard, and he has the confidence to wish that attention be paid to his prayer, whether it is innocent, chaste, and faithful, and comes from the inmost fear of conscience and heart; because, according to the apostle, one must both believe with the heart and confess with the mouth for salvation. And the reason for praying that his prayer be attended to is that, while in anguish of heart, he has cried from the ends of the earth. He who cried from the ends of the earth with anguished heart was not living in the remotest solitudes or by the Ocean; but knowing that, living in the flesh, which is earth, he already dwells at the end of the flesh, since according to Paul, while dwelling in the body, he is away from the body, since, living, he no longer lives for himself, nor does he himself live, but Christ lives in him; groaning nevertheless in this dwelling of his and hastening to be clothed over; and therefore he cries with anguished heart from the ends of the earth, because he both has the necessity of living in the flesh and holds the hope of ceasing from the vices of the flesh, saying:
60.3CSEL 22:204–205
In petra exaltasti me, deduxisti me; quia factus es spes mea, turris fortitudinis a facie inimici. habitabo in tabernaculo tuo in saeculum. hinc itaque iam sanctus a terrse finibus clamat, quia exaltatus in petra sit. petra autem secundum apostolum Christus est, quem exaltauit deus et donauit illi nomen, quod est super omne nomen. in quo et elegit nos ante mundi constitutionem in caelestibus. per eum enim sumus in spem aeternitatis deducti et in hac spe non confundimur, quia ab inimici facie hsec eadem spes nobis fortitudinis turris est facta. nam cum in muris sit ualida et firma munitio, murorum tamen ipsorum firmitas in turribus omnis est. et idcirco turris fortitudinis exaltans nos in petra deus factus est, quia per hanc spem uim diaboli eiusque insidias sustinemus tutissima aduersum eum spiritalesque eius nequitias fidei munitione consepti: cum in tabernaculo dei habitaturi simus in saecula, sine ullo scilicet aetatis modo in aeternum fluentibus saeculis temporibusque mansuri.
"On a rock you have lifted me up; you have led me; for you have become my hope, a tower of strength from the face of the enemy. I will dwell in your tabernacle for ever." Hence, then, the holy one cries already from the ends of the earth, because he has been lifted up on a rock. And the rock, according to the apostle, is Christ, whom God exalted and gave the name that is above every name, in whom also he chose us before the foundation of the world in the heavenly places. For through him we have been led into the hope of eternity, and in this hope we are not put to shame, because this same hope has become for us a tower of strength against the face of the enemy. For though there is strong and firm fortification in walls, all the firmness of the walls themselves is in the towers. And therefore God, lifting us up on the rock, has become a tower of strength, because through this hope we withstand the force of the devil and his snares, enclosed by the fortification of faith, most safe against him and his spiritual wickedness: since we shall dwell in the tabernacle of God for ever, remaining, that is, without any measure of age, for ages and times flowing on for eternity.
60.4CSEL 22:205
Set quia haec, quamuis spe reposita iam sanctis sint, tamen adhuc sub dispensatione temporum differantur, qua munitione interim tutus sit, interiecto diapsalma demonstrat dicens: protegar in uelamento alarum tuarum, quoniam tu, deus. exaudisti orationem meam. protectionem misericordise dei sub uelamento alarum diuinus sermo significat, de quo quia superioribus tractatum est, superfluus nunc et otiosus erit sermo. sed protectionis meritum ex fide orationis indultum est secundum illud: petite et dabitur uobis.
But since these things, though already laid up in hope for the saints, are still deferred under the dispensation of times, with a diapsalma interposed he shows by what fortification he is safe meanwhile, saying: "I shall be protected in the covering of your wings, for you, God, have heard my prayer." The divine word signifies the protection of God's mercy under the covering of his wings; since this was treated in earlier passages, further discussion would now be superfluous and idle. But the merit of protection has been granted from the faith of prayer, according to the saying: "Ask, and it will be given you."
60.5CSEL 22:205–206
Quin etiam ad quam spem protectione alarum dei inumbrandus esset, ostendit dicens: dedisti hereditatem timentibus nomen tuum. dies super dies regis adicies, annos eius usque in diem generationis et generationis. permanet in aeternum in conspectu dei. haec enim hereditas sancti est, uita et incorruptio et regnum et coaeterna deo habitatio. non Israhel tantum haec hereditas scripta est, sed timentibus dei nomen. dies enim aeterni sunt regis, siue quia sancti, qui peccati serui non erunt, reges sunt secundum illud apostoli: iam sine nobis regnastis et utinam regnaretis, ut et nos uobiscum conregnaremus, siue quia hic idem etiam rex sit propheta, siue quia seternum regnum consedentem a dextris oportet regnare, donec ponat inimicos suos sub pedibus suis; non ut rex ipse tum non sit: sed cum tradiderit regnum deo patri, conregnabit is ipsis, qui reges sunt. ex quo mihi uidetur haec nunc ratio seruata. ut usque in dies generationis et generationis adicerentur super dies dierum anni eius, in conspectu autem dei maneat in aeternum: ut tempus illud, quo eum regnare, donec inimicos suos sub pedibus suis ponat. oportet, a generatione usque in generationem sit conprehensum, quia generationem hanc spiritalis natiuitatis generatio ex mortuis consequetur, aeternitatis autem suae exceptio, dum in seternum in conspectu dei est, praedicetur. est autem ipse primogenitus ex mortuis. sed huius regenerationis dominus ad apostolos ita meminit: amen dico uobis, quod uos, qui secuti estis me, in regeneratione, cum sederit filius hominis in sede maiestatis suae, et uos sedebitis super duodecim thronos iudicantes duodecim tribus Israhel. huius igitur generationis tempus ostendit et usque in hanc super dies dierum anni regis augentur. ceterum ipse in conspectu dei manebit aeternus iam omnibus, quos redemit, in reges caelorum et coheredes aeternitatis adsumptis. tradens eos regnum deo patri.
Indeed, he showed for what hope he was to be shaded by the protection of God's wings, saying: "You have given an inheritance to those who fear your name. You will add days upon days of the king, his years to the day of generation and generation. He remains for ever in the sight of God." For this is the inheritance of the holy one: life, incorruption, the kingdom, and a dwelling co-eternal with God. This inheritance was written not for Israel alone but for those who fear God's name. For the days are of the eternal king: whether because the saints, who will not be slaves of sin, are kings, according to the apostle's saying, "Already you have reigned without us, and would that you did reign, that we also might reign with you"; or because the prophet himself is also a king; or because he who sits at the right hand in the eternal kingdom must reign until he puts his enemies under his feet; not that he himself is then not king, but when he has handed over the kingdom to God the Father, he will reign together with those who are kings. From which this reasoning seems to me to have been kept now: that his years were added over the days of days up to the days of generation and generation, but that he remains for ever in the sight of God; so that the time in which he must reign, until he puts his enemies under his feet, is included from generation to generation, because the generation from the dead, the generation of spiritual birth, will follow this generation; while the exception of his eternity is proclaimed, since he is for ever in the sight of God. And he is himself the firstborn from the dead. The Lord mentions this regeneration to the apostles thus: "Truly I say to you that you who have followed me, in the regeneration, when the Son of Man sits on the throne of his majesty, you too will sit on twelve thrones judging the twelve tribes of Israel." He shows, then, the time of this generation, and up to it the years of the king are increased over the days of days. But he himself will remain eternal in the sight of God, having already taken up all whom he redeemed as kings of the heavens and co-heirs of eternity, handing them over as the kingdom to God the Father.
60.6CSEL 22:206–207
Et quia conparticipes et concorporales et conformes eius effecti sint iam in eis nec corruptione nec morte dominante, cum in omnem plenitudinem dei repleantur, subiecit spiritus prophetise: misericordiam et ueritatem eius quis requiret eorum? non inopes iam misericordise ueritatisque eius hse scilicet generationes erunt, quas in se ex mortuis regenerauit ad uitam quseque in spe gloriae dei manserint, tum cum in regnum traditae deo patri suscipientur in reges consummata in omnes eius misericordia ac ueritate, per quem redemptas se gratulentur ad uitam, sitque omnibus accessus ad patrem. post quod nihil misericordia ac ueritatis requiratur a domino, cum in dei plenitudinem inpleantur. simile autem huic prophetae dictum est id, quod ad apostolos dominus locutus est: nunc quidem tristitiam habetis; rursum autem uidebo uos et lsetabitur cor uestrum et gaudium uestrum nemo auferet a uobis. in illa die me non rogabitis quicquam, quia iam gaudium nemo ablaturus ab his sit.
And since they have been made fellow sharers, fellow members of the body, and conformed to him, neither corruption nor death now ruling in them, since they are filled with all the fullness of God, the spirit of prophecy added: "Who of them will seek his mercy and truth?" These generations which he regenerated in himself from the dead to life, and which remained in the hope of the glory of God, will no longer be needy of his mercy and truth, when, handed over as the kingdom to God the Father, they are received as kings, his mercy and truth having been completed in all, through whom they give thanks that they have been redeemed to life, and all have access to the Father. After this, nothing of mercy and truth is to be sought from the Lord, since they are filled with the fullness of God. Similar to this prophetic saying is what the Lord spoke to the apostles: "Now you have sorrow; but I will see you again and your heart will rejoice, and no one will take your joy from you. In that day you will ask me nothing"; because no one will take joy from them any more.
60.7CSEL 22:207–208
In hanc igitur seternitatis spem sese propheta confirmat dicens: sic psallam nomini tuo, deus, in sseculum sseculi. ut reddam uota mea de die in diem. psallet in sseculum saeculi et uota de die in diem reddet nullo temporum fine conclusus, hymnis aeternis seternorum uotorum gaudia redditurus, cum absoluta omni terrenorum corporum infirmitate cselestem atque angelorum agat uitam de die in diem uota reddendo secundum illud: uota mea domino reddam in atriis domus domini, in conspectu omnis populi eius, in medio tui, Hierusalem, caelestis utique matris et liberse per dominum nostrum Iesum Christum, qui est benedictus in saecula saeculorum. amen.
In this hope of eternity, then, the prophet strengthens himself, saying: "So I will sing psalms to your name, God, for age upon age, that I may render my vows day by day." He will sing psalms for age upon age and render vows day by day, enclosed by no end of times, about to render the joys of eternal vows in eternal hymns, when, every weakness of earthly bodies being released, he lives the heavenly life of angels, rendering vows day by day, according to the saying: "I will render my vows to the Lord in the courts of the Lord's house, in the sight of all his people, in your midst, Jerusalem," the heavenly mother, the free one, through our Lord Jesus Christ, who is blessed for ever and ever. Amen.
Tractates 61
61.1CSEL 22:208
Prophetise sermo non nisi ad aliquem profectum audientium scriptus est, ut aut ad scientiam doceat, aut ad uoluntatis innocentiam confirmet, ut nunc hic psalmus pro Idithun a Dauid cantatur, in quo ad dei timorem, ad humanarum siue spiritalium nequitiarum constantem tolerantiam eruditur et ad contemptum opum, quia auaritia malorum omnium radix est, firmatur. in his enim beatae aeternaeque uitae status certus est, si et pietas in deum sit et patientia in aduersis et contemptus opulentise. a dei itaque confessione c“ptus est psalmus.
The word of prophecy is written only for some advance of its hearers, either to teach toward knowledge or to confirm toward innocence of will; as now this psalm is sung by David "for Idithun," in which one is instructed in the fear of God and in steadfast endurance of human or spiritual wickedness, and is strengthened in contempt of riches, because avarice is the root of all evils. For in these the state of a blessed and eternal life is secure: if there is godliness toward God, patience in adversity, and contempt of wealth. So the psalm began with the confession of God.
61.2CSEL 22:208–210
Nonne deo subdita erit anima mea? ab ipso enim salutare meum. etenim ipse deus meus, saluator meus, susceptor meus; non mouebor amplius. confessio dei communi hominum affectu a propheta ita c“pta est, ut, cum post multam inscientise noctem, post ambiguam humanarum sententiarum incertamque doctrinam. post diuersarum religionum uanam opinionem, cum diu erratum quaesitumque de deo sit, an unus an plures, et sexus aut unius aut duplicis, et potestatis aut aequalis aut disparis, et aetatis aut uniformis aut uarise, et naturae aut innascibiles omnium aut aliquorum aliquando generatae; tum deinde cum aliquibus magna aetate et longo labore certatum sit, aut nullos omnino esse aut a cura humanae uitise abesse; iam porro cum a plerisque tractatum sit, uel solem astraque cetera deos esse uel mundum ipsum in seternitatis specie huius ac mutationum manentem cum omnibus suis, quse ex se ecferat, deum esse; iam uero ut plerique ignem uel aquas uel spiritum diuino nomine atque honore donauerint, alii quoque ligna, lapides, metalla sub specie hominum, uolucrum, ferarum adorauerint; postremo cum iam fessis omnium destitutisque studiis plerique eorum maximeque prudentes, unum hoc se scire, id est, nihil horum hominem scire docuissent: tum post hanc quasi necessariae confessionis inscientiam prudens quisque conuersus ad prophetas atque apostolos dei legem omnem sub sacramento aeternae dispositionis perceperit, in qua rationem deductae in hoc corpus animae conexaeque tractauerit, in qua diuisionem gentium secundum angelorum numerum acceperit, in qua et esse principem mundi et unius electionem gentis audierit, in qua humanae mortis auctorem non ignorauerit et habitare in carne sua peccati legem obnitentem legi mentis suae senserit et congemuerit, postea quam dei spiritum, dei uirtutem, dei sapientiam, dei filium et unigenitum deum ad remissionem peccati condemnationemque peccati legis hominem natum esse cognouerit, qui humanarum passionum sorte perfunctus ad condemnanda in se caelestium nequitiarum impia temptamenta sit mortuus, ut aeternitatem omnibus, qui per habitantem in carne nostra peccati legem moriebamur, inueheret; ac tum hoc sacramento pietatis accepto post ignorationis noctem in scientiae lumine collocatus ita dicat: nonne deo subdita erit anima mea? ab ipso enim salutare meum. etenim ipse deus meus est, saluator meus, susceptor meus: non mouebor amplius. reperta itaque fidei sede post uagos errores impietatisque sententiam, quia susceptorem suum saluatoremque cognouerit. amplius non mouetur. quid enim ultra ignorationi anxietatique hominum est relictum, cum aeternitas animae et corporis, id est totius hominis praedicetur, cum adsumptio atque susceptio terrenae nostrae carnis a deo sub sacramento magnae huius pietatis ostensa sit, cum peccatorum remissio condemnata peccati lege sit praestita, cum homini nostro a dextris dei consessus in caelis sit?
"Shall not my soul be subject to God? For from him is my salvation. For he is my God, my saviour, my upholder; I shall not be moved any more." The prophet began the confession of God with the common feeling of men, as follows. After a long night of ignorance, after the doubtful and uncertain teaching of human opinions, after the empty opinion of various religions, when there had long been error and inquiry about God: whether he is one or many, of one sex or two, of equal or unequal power, of uniform or varied age, and whether all are of unbegotten nature or some were at some time begotten; then, when some had contended with great age and long labour that there are no gods at all or that they are absent from the care of human life; further, when many had argued either that the sun and the other stars are gods, or that the world itself, remaining in this form of eternity and its changes, with all that it brings forth from itself, is god; and when many had honoured fire or waters or air with the divine name and honour, and others too had worshipped wood, stones, and metals in the shape of men, birds, and beasts; finally, when the pursuits of all were exhausted and abandoned, and many of them, especially the wisest, had taught that they knew this one thing, namely that man knows nothing of these matters: then, after this ignorance of a confession made, as it were, of necessity, every prudent person, turning to the prophets and apostles, would grasp the whole law of God under the mystery of the eternal dispensation. In it he would consider the reason why the soul was brought down into this body and joined to it; in it he would learn the division of the nations according to the number of the angels; in it he would hear both that there is a prince of the world and of the choice of one nation; in it he would not be ignorant of the author of human death, and would feel and groan that the law of sin dwells in his flesh, warring against the law of his mind; after he had come to know that the Spirit of God, the power of God, the wisdom of God, the Son of God and only-begotten God was born man for the forgiveness of sin and the condemnation of the law of sin, who, having gone through the lot of human sufferings, died to condemn in himself the ungodly temptations of heavenly wickedness, so as to bring eternity to all of us who were dying through the law of sin dwelling in our flesh. And then, having received this mystery of godliness, placed in the light of knowledge after the night of ignorance, he would say: "Shall not my soul be subject to God? For from him is my salvation. For he is my God, my saviour, my upholder; I shall not be moved any more." Having found the seat of faith after wandering errors and the opinion of ungodliness, because he has known his upholder and saviour, he is no longer moved. For what is left any longer for human ignorance and anxiety, when the eternity of soul and body, that is, of the whole man, is proclaimed; when the assumption and taking up of our earthly flesh by God has been shown under the mystery of this great godliness; when the forgiveness of sins has been granted, the law of sin having been condemned; when our man has a seat at God's right hand in the heavens?
61.3CSEL 22:210–211
Sed hanc humanae beatitudinis spem gentilium impietatum studia comminuunt, prudentise ssecularis inanitate profectum homini ad deum denegantes et deo consortium adsumpti corporis detrahentes, arbitri moderatoresque diuinae potestatis: quasi difficilius deo sit adsumpsisse hominem quam eum in tanta naturse ac uitse suae ratione formasse. hanc itaque impiam eorum obtrectationem propheta mox arguit: quousque inruitis in hominem? interficitis uniuersi, tamquam parieti inclinato et maceriae inpulsse? inpellunt enim hae ignorantes atque impiae disputationes hominem ad uitia procliuem et quassum iam cadentemque demergunt consiliis adhortationum fallacium noxiarumque perimentes: quasi parua sibi ipsa conciliatrix uitiorum uoluntas sit, quam adhuc desperatio iudicii aeterni retributionisque in usum tantum prsesentium et corporalium adhortetur.
But the pursuits of pagan ungodliness diminish this hope of human blessedness, denying through the emptiness of worldly prudence that man can advance to God and taking from God fellowship in an assumed body, making themselves judges and governors of divine power: as if it were harder for God to have assumed man than to have formed him with so great a reasoning of nature and life. The prophet soon rebukes this ungodly disparagement of theirs: "How long will you rush upon a man? You all kill, as at a leaning wall and a tottering fence." For these ignorant and ungodly disputations push man, already prone to vices, and sink him, shaken and already falling, destroying him with the counsels of deceitful and harmful exhortations: as if the will itself were a small promoter of vices, which despair of eternal judgment and recompense urges on further to the enjoyment only of present and bodily things.
61.4CSEL 22:211–212
Sed hunc corporis sui parietem, quem ante libido, ebrietas, auaritia, ira perfoderat, iam in se in domum dei uiuis lapidibus extructum esse non nescit et in imaginem dei creatum esse recolit: certusque conformem se dei glorise praeparari subiecit: uerumtamen honorem meum cogitauerunt repellere, cucurri in siti. illis honorem suum detrahere cogitantibus ille in siti cucurrit. est enim sitis bonorum seternorum et spiritalis esuries in sanctis, de qua dictum est: beati, qui esuriunt et sitiunt iustitiam. cursum ergo iustitiae suse sitiens tenuit, omnem uitam integram etiam ab ipsa contradicentium sibi obtrectatione conseruans. nam et a domino suo didicit. ut opera omnia sua etiam gentilis testimonii iudicio laudentur, cum dicitur: sic luceant opera uestra coram hominibus, ut magnificent patrem uestrum, qui est in caelis. sic et Paulus placens omnia in omnibus neque Iudseis neque Graecis neque ecclesiae scandalum est, ne habeat aduersarius male de se quid loqui, illo quidem obtrectandi studium uoluntatemque retinente, quamuis se ille liberum ab omni obtrectationis occasione praestaret; quod et in hoc sancto in siti currente cognoscimus. sequitur enim: ore suo benedicebant et corde suo maledicebant, cum et conseruantes honorem suum probabilis uitae confessione benedicerent et interioris odii malignitate maledicerent.
But he knows that this wall of his body, which lust, drunkenness, avarice, and anger had previously dug through, is now built in him into the house of God with living stones, and he recalls that he was created in the image of God; and, certain that he is being prepared to be conformed to God's glory, he added: "But they plotted to cast down my honour; I ran in thirst." While they plotted to take away his honour, he ran in thirst. For there is in the saints a thirst for eternal goods and a spiritual hunger, of which it is said, "Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness." Thirsting, then, he kept the course of his righteousness, preserving his whole life intact even from the disparagement of those who opposed him. For he learned from his Lord that all his works should be praised even by the judgment of pagan testimony, when it is said: "So let your works shine before men, that they may glorify your Father who is in heaven." So too Paul, pleasing all in all things, is a stumbling block neither to Jews nor to Greeks nor to the church, so that the adversary may have nothing evil to say of him, though the adversary keeps his zeal and wish to disparage, however free Paul made himself of every occasion of disparagement; which we recognize also in this saint running in thirst. For there follows: "With their mouth they blessed, and with their heart they cursed," since, keeping his honour, they blessed him by confessing his upright life, and cursed him with the malice of inner hatred.
61.5CSEL 22:212–213
Sed id. quod sibi maxime salutare est, sanctus iste etiam diapsalma interueniente congeminat, indefessse in nobis confessionis perseuerantiam oportere esse demonstrans. sequitur enim: uerumtamen deo subiecta est anima mea, quoniam ab ipso est patientia mea. quia ipse est deus meus et saluator meus, adiutor meus, non emigrabo. in deo salutare meum et gloria mea. deus auxilii mei, et spes mea in deo meo. inpellant quidem isti inclinatum parietem maceriamque iam quassam et, benedicente licet ore, corde maledicant, scit tamen subiectam animam suam deo esse oportere, quia ab ipso patientia sua sit. didicit enim ab eo non auertere faciem a sputamentis nec subtrahere alapis maxillas nec potandum cum felle acetum renuere nec post colaphos et flagella maledicere. ipse enim deus suus est atque saluator, ipse etiam adiutor, ne de patientia? huius perseuerantia speique suae fiducia motus emigret. in eo enim est salus et gloria eius et spes, qui se coexcitatum sibi conformem sit caelesti suae gloriae redditurus.
But what is most saving to him this saint repeats even with a diapsalma intervening, showing that there must be in us a tireless perseverance in confession. For there follows: "Yet my soul is subject to God, for from him is my patience. For he is my God and my saviour, my helper; I will not depart. In God is my salvation and my glory. God of my help, and my hope is in my God." Let them push the leaning wall and the already tottering fence, and, though blessing with the mouth, curse with the heart; yet he knows that his soul must be subject to God, because from him is his patience. For he learned from him not to turn away his face from spitting, not to withdraw his cheeks from blows, not to refuse vinegar to drink with gall, not to curse after fists and scourges. For he himself is his God and saviour, he also his helper, so that he may not depart, moved from the perseverance of this patience and the confidence of his hope. For in him is the salvation and glory and hope of the one who will restore him, raised together with him, conformed to his heavenly glory.
61.6CSEL 22:213
Et quia spei huius ipse etiam ceteris, ut propheta, sit prsedicator, subiecit: sperate in eum omnis coetus plebis et effundite coram illo corda uestra, quia deus adiutor noster est. nihil occultum, nihil clausum, nihil obligatum sub dei confessione in corde retinendum est. effundendus coram eo omnis adfectus est, ut nihil de nobismetipsis fiduciae sit, sed ut per eum, ante quem nos tamquam pro peccato effundimus, adiuuemur. effundenda autem coram eo corda nostra lacrimis et fletibus sunt secundum illud: fuerunt mihi lacrimse meae panis die ac nocte, dum dicitur mihi cotidie: ubi est deus tuus? hsec recordatus sum et effudi in me animam meam; effusionem animae in lacrimarum profusione esse demonstrans, quia per eas rogandus est, qui est solus fidelis adiutor.
And since, as a prophet, he is also a preacher of this hope to others, he added: "Hope in him, all the assembly of the people, and pour out your hearts before him, for God is our helper." Nothing hidden, nothing closed, nothing bound is to be kept in the heart under the confession of God. Every feeling is to be poured out before him, so that there is no confidence in ourselves, but that we may be helped by him before whom we pour ourselves out as for sin. Our hearts are to be poured out before him with tears and weeping, according to the saying: "My tears have been my bread day and night, while it is said to me daily: Where is your God? These things I remembered and poured out my soul within me"; showing that the pouring out of the soul is in the shedding of tears, because through them he is to be entreated who alone is the faithful helper.
61.7CSEL 22:213–214
Sed officio suo functus propheta admonitionem suam parui apud impios scit esse momenti; nam continuo diapsalma intercedente subiecit: uerumtamen uani filii hominum, mendaces filii hominum in stateris; ut decipiant ipsi de uanitate in idipsum. uani homines, quia aut ipsi uana sperent aut in eos sperare sit uanum; mendaces quoque, quia impietatis suae sensu aut falluntur aut fallunt: et in eo mendaces, ut decipiant in stateris, sub iustitiae scilicet nomine iniusta peragentes. nam ubi examen de se moderatae prudentise pollicentur, ibi studia immoderatae impietatis exercent, errore se ipsos, quem a ceteris depellere se professi sunt, inplicantes: et idcirco ipsi de uanitate in idipsum, illo scilicet recidentes, ex quo se excedere gloriantur.
But having performed his duty, the prophet knows that his admonition is of little weight with the ungodly; for at once, with a diapsalma intervening, he added: "But vain are the sons of men, liars are the sons of men in the balances, so that they themselves deceive from vanity into the same." Vain men, because either they hope for vain things or it is vain to hope in them; liars too, because by the sense of their ungodliness they either are deceived or deceive; and liars in this, that they deceive in the balances, doing unjust things under the name of justice. For where they promise a weighing of moderate prudence from themselves, there they practise the pursuits of immoderate ungodliness, entangling themselves in the error which they professed to drive away from others; and therefore they themselves go from vanity into the same, falling back into that from which they boast they depart.
61.8CSEL 22:214
Sed radix maxime iniquitatum in pecuniae cupiditate est; quam qui adpetit, grauissimse tempestatis naufragio mergetur. sequitur enim: nolite sperare in iniquitate et in rapinas nolite concupiscere. diuitise si fluant, nolite cor adponere. magnae enim in his desiderii sui et amoris inlecebrse sunt: rapiunt ingenia mentesque pendulas adprehendunt. non solum itaque non concupiscendae earum rapinse sunt, uerum ab his uoluntas nostra, etiam si praebeantur fluantque, referenda est, ne desideratae cupitaeque dominentur. non enim hsec spebus nostris bona sunt coaeterna, neque nobiscum aut condescendunt in infernum aut conresurgunt de inferno. fides, pietas, continentia, benignitas expetenda est, et maxime dei cognitio sectanda est. ceterum haec uana et per naturam sui ad omnem iniquitatum necessitatem captiosa uitanda sunt.
But the root of iniquities is above all in the love of money; whoever seeks it will be sunk in the shipwreck of a most grievous storm. For there follows: "Do not hope in iniquity, and do not covet plunder. If riches flow, do not set your heart on them." For there are great enticements of desire and love in them: they seize talents and grasp wavering minds. So not only is their plunder not to be coveted, but our will must be drawn back from them even if they are offered and flow in, lest, desired and longed for, they become masters. For these are not goods co-eternal with our hopes, nor do they go down with us into the underworld or rise again with us from the underworld. Faith, godliness, self-control, and kindness are to be sought, and above all the knowledge of God is to be pursued. But these vain things, by their nature captious and leading to every necessity of iniquity, are to be avoided.
61.9CSEL 22:214–216
Et quod illud magis ad spem seternitatis expetendum esset, propheta subiecit dicens: semel locutus est deus, duo haec audiui, quia potestas dei est, et tibi, domine, misericordia, quia tu reddis unicuique secundum opera eius. semel deo loquente duo audiuit; et necesse est ea sibi esse conexa, quse sub unius sermonis significatione sunt cognita. ad deum namque in exordio psalmi propheticam confessionem retulerat dicens: nonne deo subdita erit anima mea? ab ipso enim salutare meum. depellendus itaque absolute fuit Iudaicse impietatis furor: ut in deo patre significari doceretur et filius, ut nunc in uno etiam alter ostenditur. eam enim fidem esse subdendae deo animae suse testatus est, quia ab ipso esset salutaris eius. et salutarem Iesum esse saepe tractatum est. semel autem deo loquente duo intellecta sunt et audita, sicut illud: pater, manifestaui nomen tuum hominibus in patre significauit et filium, uti Duae semel loquente deo duo hsec audiuit: quia potestas dei est, et tibi, domine, misericordia, quia tu reddis unicuique secundum opera eius. nouit Paulus in uno utrumque, id est neutrum sine altero confiteri dicens: unus deus est, et unus dominus, quia et in deo dominus, et deus significetur in domino. in semel itaque loquente deo hsec duo audiuntur: quia potestas dei est, et tibi, domine, misericordia. ab ipso enim salutare eius est; et filius omnia accepit a patre: et idcirco in eo dei potestas uel accepta uel nata est. pater enim non iudicat quemquam, sed omne iudicium dedit filio. retributor ergo uniuscuiusque est ille, qui iudex est. sed potestas eius est, a quo unigenitus deus est natus in iudicem; et potestas eius a deo est, qui iudicium accepit a patre: atque ita nec caret potestate qui iudex est, nec miseratione qui deus est. certe necesse est aeterni iudicii reus maneat in uno utrumque non confitens, cum tamen non unus intellegendus sit esse, qui uterque sit, dicens: pater in me et ego in patre, dominus noster Iesus Christus, qui est benedictus in saecula saeculorum. amen.
And as to what is rather to be sought for the hope of eternity, the prophet added, saying: "God has spoken once; these two things I have heard: that power is God's, and mercy is yours, Lord, for you render to each according to his works." When God spoke once, he heard two things; and those things must be joined to each other which are known under the meaning of one utterance. For at the beginning of the psalm he had referred the prophetic confession to God, saying: "Shall not my soul be subject to God? For from him is my salvation." The fury of Jewish ungodliness had to be driven off completely, so that it might be taught that in God the Father the Son too is signified, as now in one the other also is shown. For he testified that the faith of subjecting his soul to God is this, that from him is his salvation; and it has often been discussed that Salvation is Jesus. And when God spoke once, two things were understood and heard; just as the saying, "Father, I have manifested your name to men," signified in the Father also the Son; so the two things heard when God spoke once are: "that power is God's, and mercy is yours, Lord, for you render to each according to his works." Paul knew how to confess both in one, that is, neither without the other, saying: "There is one God and one Lord," since the Lord is signified in God and God in the Lord. When God spoke once, then, these two things are heard: "that power is God's, and mercy is yours, Lord." For from him is his salvation; and the Son received all things from the Father; and therefore in him the power of God was either received or born. For the Father judges no one, but has given all judgment to the Son. He, then, who is judge is the one who repays each. But the power is his from whom the only-begotten God was born as judge; and his power is from God, he who received judgment from the Father; and so neither does he who is judge lack power, nor he who is God lack mercy. Certainly he must remain guilty of eternal judgment who does not confess both in one; though he is not to be understood as being one who is both, he who says, "The Father is in me and I in the Father," our Lord Jesus Christ, who is blessed for ever and ever. Amen.
Tractates 62
62.1CSEL 22:216
Dauid in deserto habitasse libro regnorum continetur, ut, qui passiones domini praefigurabat, etiam tum eas, cum desertum habitat, prophetaret, unigenito deo aeque in deserto moraturo. sed ut sancto uiro congruum et tanto propheta erat dignum, cum declinans odia impiorum solitudini se dedisset, maximis rerum caelestium sacramentis occupatur et ab omni humanae aut impietatis aut ignorationis coetu remotus animum ad ea, quibus seternitatis cognitio ac meritum adquirebatur, intendit. non occupatus, non impeditus communium rerum ac saeculi curis, sed in illo solitudinis suae quieto otiosoque secreto, cum nihil in oculos, in mentem offensionis incurreret, solis est diuinis studiis negotiosus. et uideamus, unde psalmi sermo sit c“ptus.
It is contained in the book of Kingdoms that David lived in the desert, so that he who prefigured the Lord's sufferings might prophesy them even when he lived in the desert, since the only-begotten God would likewise stay in the desert. But as befitted a holy man and was worthy of so great a prophet, when, avoiding the hatreds of the ungodly, he had given himself to solitude, he is occupied with the greatest mysteries of heavenly things, and, removed from every gathering of human ungodliness or ignorance, he turns his mind to the things by which the knowledge and merit of eternity were acquired. Not occupied, not hindered by the cares of common things and the world, but in that quiet and leisured secrecy of his solitude, when nothing offensive ran into his eyes or mind, he is busy with divine pursuits alone. Let us see where the discourse of the psalm began.
62.2CSEL 22:216–217
Deus deus meus, ad te de luce uigilo. huic plane ad gratulationem cognitionemque dei dies c“pta est, cui initium idipsum orandi ad deum, quod lucis est. deum quidem uniuersitatis, sed tamen per cognitionis scientiam deum suum deprecatur.
"God, my God, I watch for you from the dawn." For this man the day plainly began with thanksgiving and knowledge of God, for whom the very beginning of praying to God is that of the light. He entreats the God of the universe, yet his own God through the knowledge of acquaintance.
62.3CSEL 22:217–218
Oratio autem non tam uerborum est, quam adfectus; et idcirco subiecit: sitiuit tibi anima mea, quam simpliciter et caro mea. in terra deserta et inuia et inaquosa deo igitur, penes quem fons uitae est, anima ipsius sitit desiderio intenta potandi. et quidem uniuscuiusque mens ad cognitionem spemque seternitatis naturali quodam fertur instinctu, quia ueluti insitum inpressumque omnibus sit, diuinam inesse nobis animarum originem opinari. cum non exiguam caelestis in se generis cognationem mens ipsa cognoscat porro autem terrena hsec corpora, quae ad uitiorum concreta materiam sint, dum his, quibus quasi naturaliter delectantur, infecta sunt, desperant se consequi posse consortium munusque caeleste: quasi non et animse naturam uitia corporis, quibus oblectatur, inficiant, aut, cum delectatio corporis redundet ad mentem, non et mentem secum corpus retrahat ad oblectationis adfectum. necesse est autem ut in eadem condemnatione sit uoluptatis, quod in eadem est uoluptate. sed nos spiritalibus doctrinis eruditi scimus et animse et corpori salutem a deo esse donatam, si modo post regenerationis gratiam mentis gaudiis sensus corporis inbuatur, id est, si non secundum carnem, sed secundum spiritum uixerimus; quia spiritus carnisque opera secundum apostolum uitiorum et continentise studiis distinguantur. arduum autem, sed maxime uerum est, seternitatem ita corporis ut animae sperare. et ideo ad sitim animae propheta subiecit: sitiuit tibi anima mea, quam simpliciter et caro mea, nihil in se sub infidelitatis ambiguitate retinens incertum: sed tam simpliciter, quam anima deo sitiens, et caro sua sitiat. sitit enim non corpori, sed deo sitiens. nam quamuis eum in deserto et inuio et inaquoso manentem necessitas ipsa naturse ad sitim corporis detineret, tamen etiam per has inediae et sitis passiones scit fidem probandam esse credentium, ut magis anima deo, quam corpori, sitiat, sitiens et corpori: quia neque fames neque angustiae neque ulla genera passionum a caritate dei, quae est in Christo, sint apostolum separatura, sitit ergo deo sanctus. et quid sitiat, psalmo alio testatus est, cum dicit: sitiuit anima mea ad deum uiuum, quando ueniam et parebo ante faciem dei? hoc animse desiderium, haec sitis spei eius est, ut dei sibi proueniat aspectus, ut quamprimum raptus in nubibus, deo Christo obuiam eleuatus appareat
Prayer is not so much of words as of feeling; and therefore he added: "My soul has thirsted for you, how simply my flesh too, in a desert land, pathless and waterless." For God, then, with whom is the fountain of life, his soul thirsts, intent with the desire of drinking. And indeed the mind of every person is carried by a kind of natural instinct toward the knowledge and hope of eternity, since it is as if implanted and impressed in all to think that there is in us a divine origin of souls, since the mind itself recognizes in itself no small kinship with the heavenly race. But these earthly bodies, compacted from matter fit for vices, while they are stained with the things in which they delight as if by nature, despair of being able to attain heavenly fellowship and reward: as if the vices of the body in which it delights did not also stain the nature of the soul, or as if, when the delight of the body overflows to the mind, the body did not also draw the mind with it to the feeling of delight. What is in the same pleasure must be in the same condemnation of pleasure. But we, instructed by spiritual teachings, know that salvation has been given by God to both soul and body, provided that after the grace of regeneration the sense of the body is imbued with the joys of the mind, that is, if we live not according to the flesh but according to the Spirit; because according to the apostle the works of the Spirit and of the flesh are distinguished by the pursuits of vices and of self-control. It is hard, but most true, to hope for eternity for the body as well as for the soul. And therefore to the thirst of the soul the prophet added, "My soul has thirsted for you, how simply my flesh too," keeping nothing uncertain in himself under the doubt of unbelief, but his flesh thirsting as simply as his soul thirsts for God. For he thirsts not for the body, but thirsting for God. For although the very necessity of nature held him, remaining in a desert, pathless and waterless place, to bodily thirst, yet he knows that through these sufferings of want and thirst the faith of believers is to be proved, so that the soul thirsts more for God than for the body, though thirsting for the body too; because neither hunger nor distress nor any kinds of suffering would separate the apostle from the love of God that is in Christ. The saint thirsts for God, then. And what he thirsts for he testified in another psalm, when he says: "My soul has thirsted for the living God; when shall I come and appear before the face of God?" This is the desire of the soul, this the thirst of his hope: that the sight of God may come to him, that as soon as possible, caught up in the clouds and raised to meet God the Christ, he may appear.
62.4CSEL 22:218–219
Et desiderii huius adfectum nunc quoque propheta declarat. nam post sitis protestationem, post deserti et inuii et inaquosi inopiam, quia in his ueluti militia et uictoria sit fidei, subiecit: sic in sancto apparui tibi, ut uiderem uirtutem tuam et gloriam tuam: quia melior misericordia tua super uitam. prophetiae scientia est pro gerendis gesta memorare. et hinc frequens auctoritas est, cum aceto potauerunt adhuc in passione potandum, cum disciderunt uestem, quae discindenda post esset; ut nunc in siti corporis deo sitiens ei in sancto suo talis apparet, in simplicitate carnis, in siti animae, in oratione diluculi, quia non nisi per hsec probati uel adsumpti habebuntur a Christo uel ei obuiam rapientur in nubibus. sed in sancto dei non aliter apparebunt deo, quam secundum illud: qui me uidit, uidit et patrem atque illud: ego et pater unum sumus. quia in filii et natura et nomine seternse naturae ac nominis significatio continetur: apparens filio uel susceptus a filio patri apparebit in filio.
And now too the prophet declares the feeling of this desire. For after the declaration of thirst, after the want of the desert, pathless and waterless, because in these there is, as it were, the warfare and victory of faith, he added: "So in the holy place I have appeared to you, to see your power and your glory; for your mercy is better than life." It belongs to the knowledge of prophecy to record things to be done as done. And hence comes the frequent authority, when "they gave him vinegar to drink" was said while it was still to be given in the passion, when "they divided the garment," which was to be divided later; so now, thirsting for God in the thirst of the body, he appears such to him in his holy one: in simplicity of flesh, in thirst of soul, in prayer at dawn, because only through these will they be held approved or taken up by Christ, or be caught up to meet him in the clouds. But in the holy one of God they will appear to God in no other way than according to that saying, "He who has seen me has seen the Father," and that, "I and the Father are one"; because in the nature and name of the Son the meaning of the eternal nature and name is contained: appearing to the Son or taken up by the Son, he will appear to the Father in the Son.
62.5CSEL 22:219
Atque, ut in sancto appariturus deo cuius sancti desiderium in hac sitis suse significatione ostenderet, subiecit: ut uiderem uirtutem tuam et gloriam tuam: eum scilicet ut uideret, qui secundum apostolum et uirtus dei est et in gloria dei est, uisurus autem non ad aliud, quam ad consortium seternitatis merendum et ad regni caelestis seternitatem sortiendam, quia haec per misericordiam dei ultra uitse huius beatitudinem prseparentur.
And to show, by this meaning of his thirst, the desire for that holy one in whom he would appear to God, he added: "to see your power and your glory"; that is, to see him who, according to the apostle, is both the power of God and in the glory of God; and he would see him for nothing other than to merit fellowship in eternity and to obtain the eternity of the heavenly kingdom, since these are prepared through God's mercy beyond the blessedness of this life.
62.6CSEL 22:219–220
Id enim sequitur: quia melior misericordia tua super uitam. magnum quidem dei munus est, quod uenimus in uitam, et ipsa natura duce nasci nos gratulamur. sed quia plena omnis anxietatum ac dolorum setas nostra est, plus in misericordia dei spei est, quam in uita: quia hanc mors ex peccati lege consequitur, haec uero seternitatem ex morte restituet. sicuti tritici satio ac dissolutio ipsa tritici conseruatione praestantior est — hoc enim deus, prout uult, uestit in spico — ita magnum misericordiae dei munus est, si commortui Christo uiuamus in Christo. nam et ipsa Adse mors, ne in seternitatis p“na maneret, sub misericordise significatione est constituta et apostolus dissolui se melius sibi esse decernit. et propheta gaudium mansurae se mortis ostendit dicens: pretiosa in conspectu domini mors sanctorum eius, quia per eam cum peccati lege resolutis demutationis gloriosae profectu seternitas animae corporisque iam sine peccati corpore rependetur.
For there follows: "for your mercy is better than life." It is indeed a great gift of God that we have come into life, and with nature itself as guide we rejoice at being born. But since our whole age is full of anxieties and pains, there is more hope in God's mercy than in life; for death follows this life from the law of sin, but mercy will restore eternity from death. As the sowing and dissolving of wheat is better than keeping the wheat (for God clothes it in the ear as he wills), so it is a great gift of God's mercy if, having died with Christ, we live in Christ. For even Adam's death, lest he remain in the punishment of eternity, was appointed under the meaning of mercy; and the apostle judges that it is better for him to depart. And the prophet shows the joy of the death that awaits him, saying, "Precious in the sight of the Lord is the death of his saints," because through it, when we have been released together with the law of sin, by the advance of glorious change, eternity of soul and body, now without the body of sin, will be repaid.
62.7CSEL 22:220–221
Certus ergo misericordise dei, quae supra uitam melior sit, propheta officium gratulationis exsequitur dicens: labia mea laudabunt te. sic benedicam te in uita mea et in nomine tuo leuabo manus meas. et sermone et opere laudat deum atque benedicit; nam in uita sua benedicens in nomine suo manus eleuabit in eleuatione manuum non habitum orandi, sed excelsi operis indicium significari frequenter docuimus. in hac igitur uita sua deum, quia misericordia eius supra uitas sit melior, laudabit. est enim et uita post uitam, qua in Abrahse sinibus uiuendum est, in qua et dei nomen in pauperis quiete benedicitur, secundum illud prophetae: non mortui laudabunt te, domine, neque omnes, qui descendunt in infernum; sed nos, qui uiuimus, benedicimus dominum. super has igitur uitas misericordia ea est, quae, quod oculus non uidit et auris non audiuit et in cor hominis non ascendit, his, qui dominum diligunt, prseparauit.
Certain, then, of God's mercy, which is better than life, the prophet performs the duty of thanksgiving, saying: "My lips will praise you. So I will bless you in my life, and in your name I will lift up my hands." He praises and blesses God both in word and in work; for blessing in his life, he will lift up his hands in his name. We have often taught that the lifting of hands signifies not the posture of praying but the sign of lofty work. In this life of his, then, he will praise God, because his mercy is better than lives. For there is also a life after life, in which one is to live in Abraham's bosom, in which the name of God is blessed in the rest of the poor man, according to the prophet's saying: "The dead will not praise you, Lord, nor all who go down to the underworld; but we who live bless the Lord." Above these lives, then, is that mercy which has prepared for those who love the Lord what eye has not seen nor ear heard nor has it entered the heart of man.
62.8CSEL 22:221
Hanc igitur laudat atque benedicit, non etiam nunc ab holocaustis pecudum adipisque pinguedine sacrificia legis expectans, sed in sola animae confessione benedictionisque laude se ipsum deo hostiam statuens secundum illud: sacrificium laudis honorificabit me et illud: immola deo sacrificium laudis et illud: quoniam si uoluisses sacrificium, dedissem utique, holocaustis non delectaberis, quia litterae ac legis allegorumena praescriptione cessante deus uiuse intellegentisque hostise sit laudibus honorandus. subiecit enim: sicut adipe et pinguedine repleatur anima mea, et labia exultationis laudabunt nomen tuum. neque illa quasi abominanda. condemnat, sed haec ut magis expectata confirmans, cum sicut adipe et pinguedine, quae sacrificiorum primitise habebantur, repleri animam suam exultationis laude deposcat.
This mercy, then, he praises and blesses, no longer now expecting the sacrifices of the law from burnt offerings of cattle and the richness of fat, but offering himself to God as a sacrifice in the sole confession of the soul and the praise of blessing, according to the sayings: "The sacrifice of praise will honour me"; and, "Offer to God the sacrifice of praise"; and, "For if you had wanted sacrifice, I would have given it; you will not delight in burnt offerings"; because, the prescription of the letter and the allegories of the law ceasing, God is to be honoured with the praises of a living and understanding sacrifice. For he added: "Let my soul be filled as with fat and richness, and lips of exultation will praise your name." He does not condemn those things as abominable, but confirms these as more expected, since he asks that his soul be filled with the praise of exultation as with fat and richness, which were held to be the firstfruits of sacrifices.
62.9CSEL 22:221–222
Verum haec non tam uerborum officia quam mentis sunt, ut sacrificium laudis ex operum sanctitate descendat. itaque continuo subiecit: si memoratus sum tui supra stratum meum, in matutinis meditabar in te. meditationem matutinam recordatio nocturna consummat; et idcirco de luce ad deum uigilat, quia ex strati, id est ex lectuli puritate et fiducia et conscientia orationis est matutinae. obrepentes itaque sub secreto noctis cogitationes dei recordatione conpressit, seseque aduersum carnis incentiua luctantem metus nominis dei sui iuuit. sequitur enim: quia fuisti adiutor meus et in uelamento alarum tuarum sperabo, dei se meditatione, per quam sibi adiutor est, protegente. non enim ei alia quam placendi deo cura est: eius tantum in strato meminit, in eo matutinus ex nocturna recordatione meditatur; adiutor suus est et sub uelamento alarum eius exultat, id est tegmine protegentis est tutus.
But these are duties not so much of words as of the mind, so that the sacrifice of praise comes down from holiness of works. So he at once added: "If I remembered you upon my bed, in the mornings I meditated on you." Remembrance at night completes meditation in the morning; and therefore he watches for God from the dawn, because the confidence and consciousness of morning prayer come from the purity of the bed, that is, of the couch. So he suppressed by remembrance of God the thoughts that creep in under the secrecy of night, and the fear of his God's name helped him as he struggled against the incitements of the flesh. For there follows: "For you have been my helper, and in the covering of your wings I will hope," the meditation on God, through which he is his helper, protecting him. For he has no other care than to please God: he remembers him alone on his bed, meditates on him in the morning from the remembrance of the night; he is his helper, and he exults under the covering of his wings, that is, he is safe under the shelter of his protector.
62.10CSEL 22:222
Sed horum omnium hinc profectus, hinc causa est, quia sequitur: adhaesit anima mea post te, me suscepit dextera tua. amoris hsec uis est, ut his, quos amamus. etiamsi absentes sint, hsereamus, dum adfectum insitum nequaquam aut locus diuellit aut tempus. adhaesit ergo deo propheta non blandimentis saeculi, non corporis uitiis amorem suum ab eo caritatemque retrahentibus, quia secundum apostolum adhserenti deo unus est spiritus et dominus pro discipulis orauit: pater, sicut nos unum sumus, ut et illi unum sint in nobis. adhaerens ergo deo susceptus a dei dextera est: id est per uirtutem dei, quse significatur in dextera, ab eo, qui dei et uirtus et sapientia et uerbum caro est factus, adsumptus est conformis gloriae corporis iam futurus.
But the advance and cause of all these is this, for there follows: "My soul has clung after you; your right hand has taken me up." This is the force of love, that we cling to those we love even if they are absent, since neither place nor time ever tears away the feeling implanted. The prophet, then, clung to God, the allurements of the world and the vices of the body not drawing away his love and affection from him; because according to the apostle, "He who clings to God is one spirit," and the Lord prayed for the disciples: "Father, as we are one, so that they too may be one in us." Clinging to God, then, he was taken up by God's right hand: that is, through the power of God, which is signified by the right hand, he was taken up by him who is the power and wisdom of God and the Word made flesh, being now about to be conformed to the glory of his body.
62.11CSEL 22:222–223
Et quia susceptus a dei dextera metum omnem a se, qui ab inimicis suis esse possit, abiecit, fiduciae suae non tacuit securitatem neque iusti iudicii dei ignorat seueritatem dicens: ipsi autem in uanum qusesierunt animam meam, introibunt in inferiora terrae, tradentur in manus gladii, partes uulpium erunt. in uanum itaque animam suam quaerunt. secundum enim euangelium homo cum corpore animam non perimit, et misericordia dei melior super uitam est, et hic iam susceptus a dextera dei est. terrse autem inferiora introibunt, quia chao inuio separantur a sanctis; et in manus gladii tradentur, quia secundum diuitem potestas p“nse, quae in ore gladii significatur, in impios exeretur; partes etiam uulpium erunt, fallacium bestiolarum sortem adepturi: quia. et Herodes est uulpis et uineam sponsi exterminant uulpes et foueam sibi filio hominis caput suum nusquam reclinante in impiorum cordibus condiderunt; et dsemonum in his significatas esse nequitias non dubium est, quibus cum principe eorum praeparatus ignis gehennse est.
And since, taken up by God's right hand, he has cast off all fear that could come from his enemies, he did not keep silent about the security of his confidence, nor is he ignorant of the severity of God's just judgment, saying: "But they have sought my soul in vain; they will go into the lower parts of the earth; they will be handed over to the hands of the sword; they will be the portion of foxes." They seek his soul in vain, then. For according to the Gospel man does not destroy the soul with the body; and God's mercy is better than life; and he has already been taken up by God's right hand. They will go into the lower parts of the earth, because they are separated from the saints by an impassable chasm; and they will be handed over to the hands of the sword, because, as with the rich man, the power of punishment, which is signified in the edge of the sword, will be exercised on the ungodly. They will also be the portion of foxes, about to obtain the lot of deceitful little beasts: because Herod too is a fox, and foxes destroy the bridegroom's vineyard, and they have made for themselves a den in the hearts of the ungodly, while the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head; and there is no doubt that the wickedness of demons is signified in them, for whom, with their prince, the fire of Gehenna has been prepared.
62.12CSEL 22:223–224
Sed inter hsec laetitiam eius, qui ob humanae salutis gaudium frequenter ad patrem exultauit, ostendit: rex autem lsetabitur in domino, laudabitur omnis, qui iurat in eo: quoniam obstructum est os loquentium iniqua. causam, cur rex lsetetur, significat, quia, quisque in eo iurabit, in deo sacramenti huius religione laudabitur: qui sciat scilicet regem Iesum, qui etiam deum super omnia, qui secundum Paulum testetur magni dei saluatoris aduentum, qui secundum Esaiam iurans in eum iurabit in deum uerum. obstructum enim est os loquentium iniqua, quia praedicetur ex lege et ex prophetis atque ab apostolo in eo nos ante constitutionem mundi et elegisse pater et benedixisse doceatur et ipse nos coexcitauerit et conlocauerit a dextris dei in cselestibus, cum uidebunt eum in maiestate sua iudicare de uiuis et mortuis. per haec itaque obstruetur os loquentium iniqua. ipse enim est rex in seternum et in nomine domini Iesu omne genu flectet caelestium et terrestrium et inferorum, et omnis lingua confitebitur, quia dominus Iesus in gloria dei patris, qui est benedictus in saecula saeculorum. amen.
But amid these things he shows the gladness of him who often exulted to the Father for joy at human salvation: "But the king will rejoice in the Lord; everyone who swears by him will be praised, for the mouth of those who speak wicked things has been stopped." He indicates the reason why the king rejoices: because whoever swears by him will be praised in God by the devotion of this oath; namely, whoever knows Jesus as king, and also as God over all; who, according to Paul, bears witness to the coming of the great God and Saviour; who, according to Isaiah, swearing by him, will swear by the true God. For the mouth of those who speak wicked things has been stopped, because it is proclaimed from the law and from the prophets and by the apostle, and taught, that in him the Father both chose and blessed us before the foundation of the world, and that he himself raised us together and seated us at the right hand of God in the heavenly places, when they will see him in his majesty judging the living and the dead. Through these things, then, the mouth of those who speak wicked things will be stopped. For he himself is king for ever, and at the name of the Lord Jesus every knee will bend, of things in heaven and on earth and under the earth, and every tongue will confess that the Lord Jesus is in the glory of God the Father, who is blessed for ever and ever. Amen.
Tractates 63
63.1CSEL 22:224–225
Psalmi superscriptio historiam non continet. simplex est et prophetali spiritu editus: tantum per id, quod in finem praescribitur, res non sui temporis, quo scriptus est, continere testatur. sed quaerendum est, ex qua persona sit dictus, quidue ei se intellegendum enuntiet; nam sine dubio esse spiritalis est opinandus. cum enim ipsi illi psalmi, qui secundum titulorum inscriptiones res gestas continere creduntur, in plurimis a tituli sui et rerum ac personarum proprietate dissentiant magisque per editiones nominum atque gestorum spiritalium operationum significent effectus, quid de eo erit intellegendum, in quo simplex tantum psalmi in finem intellegendi inscriptio continetur, nisi quod spiritalis in eo doctrinae forma sit constituta?
The heading of the psalm contains no history. It is simple and issued by the prophetic Spirit; only by being headed "for the end" does it testify that it contains things not of its own time in which it was written. But we must ask in whose person it is spoken, or how it declares itself to be understood; for without doubt it is to be thought spiritual. For since those very psalms which, according to the inscriptions of their titles, are believed to contain events, in very many points disagree with the proper sense of their title, things, and persons, and rather signify the effects of spiritual workings through the mention of names and events, what is to be understood of one in which there is only the simple inscription of the psalm, "for the end," to be understood, except that in it a form of spiritual teaching has been set?
63.2CSEL 22:225–226
Esse autem plures memini, qui omnia, quae in libris psalmorum scripta sunt, ad personam domini nostri unigeniti dei filii existiment esse referenda, nihilque in eis aliud quam quod ei sit proprium contineri. quae eorum opinio argui non potest. omnis enim ex adfectu religiosae mentis hic sensus est; et caret culpa, propensiore studio omnia ei, per quem ipsa omnia sunt, coaptare. quamquam enim idipsum interdum imperite fiat, tamen per id, quod ad eum cuncta referuntur, necesse est ut ea, quae ei sunt propria, uere ac fideliter praedicentur. cauendum autem est, ne, dum omnia conuenire in eum aequaliter opinamur, per adsertionis huius studiosam intentionem plurimum et diuinitatis suae dignitati et corporationis sacramento et operationum potestati et passionis uirtuti et resurrectionis gloriae detrahatur.
I remember that there are many who think that everything written in the book of Psalms is to be referred to the person of our Lord, the only-begotten Son of God, and that nothing else is contained in them than what is proper to him. This opinion of theirs cannot be blamed. For this whole sense comes from the feeling of a devout mind, and it is free of fault to fit everything with eager zeal to him through whom all things are. For although this is sometimes done unskilfully, yet since everything is referred to him, what is proper to him must be proclaimed truly and faithfully. But we must take care that, while we think everything applies equally to him, through the zealous intent of this assertion very much is not taken away from the dignity of his divinity, the mystery of his taking a body, the power of his works, the force of his passion, and the glory of his resurrection.
63.3CSEL 22:226
Tenendus igitur modus est et diligenter ac caute constituendum est, quid de diuinitatis suae natiuitate, quse ei a patre est, fuerit prophetatum, quando eius hominis, quem adsumpsit, persona tractetur, ubi operatio, passio et resurrectio praedicetur, quid uero unicuique tempori congruat, quando fides gentium nuntietur, quando peccata anterioris populi arguantur, quando doctrina timoris dei et confessionis eruditio ex prophetse oratione prsestetur. in his enim prophetise spiritalis ordo consistit. et si dominus praedicatur, profectus scientiae huius ad fidem utilis est. si ad timorem et confessionem eius docemur, domino formamur, proficimus, adquirimur, ut per passionem eius redempti, ita eidem per doctrinae suae instituta placituri.
A measure must be kept, then, and it must be determined carefully and cautiously what was prophesied of the birth of his divinity, which is his from the Father; when the person of the man he assumed is being treated; where his working, passion, and resurrection are proclaimed; and what suits each time: when the faith of the nations is announced, when the sins of the former people are rebuked, when teaching of the fear of God and instruction in confession are given through the prophet's prayer. For in these the spiritual order of prophecy consists. And if the Lord is proclaimed, the advance of this knowledge is useful for faith. If we are taught to fear and confess him, we are formed for the Lord, we advance, we are gained, so that, as redeemed through his passion, we may likewise please him through the instructions of his teaching.
63.4CSEL 22:226
Esse autem in praesenti psalmo quaedam intellego, quse ei homini, quem dominus adsumpsit, aptari posse uideantur, ubi dicitur: perscrutati sunt iniquitates, defecerunt scrutantes scrutinio. significari enim forte in eo existimabitur Iudseorum conspiratio, cum testimonia, quibus argui posset, quaeruntur nec reperiuntur, et omnia scrutantium ingenia deficiunt; dehinc quod sagittis paruulorum, id est doctrinis apostolorum uulnerentur, aduersum quos nullam causam iustae persecutionis inuenerint, et ideo defecerint contra ipsos linguae eorum. haec quidem non tamquam inprobabilia praetermittimus, sed quaedam alia in psalmo sunt, quae ordinem intellegentiae huius impediant. non longe tamen ab his sermo expositionis nostrae dissentiet.
I understand that there are some things in the present psalm that may seem fitting to the man whom the Lord assumed, where it is said: "They searched out iniquities; those who searched failed in their searching." For perhaps it will be thought that the conspiracy of the Jews is signified in it, when testimonies by which he could be convicted were sought and not found, and all the wits of the searchers failed; then that they were wounded by the arrows of little ones, that is, by the teachings of the apostles, against whom they found no cause for just persecution, and so their tongues failed against them. We do not pass over these things as improbable; but there are some other things in the psalm that hinder the order of this understanding. Yet the discourse of our exposition will not differ far from these.
63.5CSEL 22:226–227
Existimamus enim non modo apostolorum, qui primi fuerunt, sed cuiusque sancti in domino sperantis confessionem praesenti psalmo contineri. inter maximas enim saeculi tempestates et grauissimas humani generis in deum impietates sumus constituti, cuius fidelem per nos et ueram confessionem nunc philosophia inrideat, nunc haereticorum furor incurset, nunc auaritiae studia condemnent, nunc ambitionis fauor inquietet. quibus omnibus dissimulandis, tolerandis, uitandis, coarguendis mens nostra nisi per deum erudita non sufficit. quantis enim et quam molestis disputationum aculeis dei prouidentiam et principalem atque ininitiabilem in creato ab eo mundo dominatum eius philosophia impugnat, nunc aquis, nunc terrae, nunc atomis, nunc caelo dei nomen indulgens! quam uero ingenioso calliditatis usu fidei doctrinam haereticus mentitur! quanto deinde audientium periculo opum gloriam auarus adfirmat! quanto quoque continentiae excidio uoluptatum gaudia corporis adsertor exsequitur! quam pestifera autem ambitiosorum in honoris adhortatione facundia est! quibus omnibus peruigil cura, pernox oratio et aeterno. ad deum confessio repugnabit. ob haec igitur fidei nostrae et aeternae salutis excidia propheta orare intellegetur in psalmo, ex persona sua, quatenus in deum sperare nos conueniat, ostendens.
For we think that the present psalm contains the confession not only of the apostles, who were the first, but of every saint who hopes in the Lord. For we have been placed amid the greatest storms of the world and the most grievous ungodliness of the human race toward God; our faithful and true confession of him is now mocked by philosophy, now attacked by the fury of heretics, now condemned by the pursuits of avarice, now disturbed by the favour of ambition. For hiding from, enduring, avoiding, and refuting all of these, our mind is not sufficient unless instructed by God. With how many and how troublesome stings of disputations does philosophy attack God's providence and his principal and beginningless dominion in the world created by him, granting the name of God now to waters, now to the earth, now to atoms, now to the sky! With what ingenious use of cunning does the heretic falsify the teaching of the faith! With how great danger to his hearers does the avaricious man assert the glory of riches! With how great a ruin of self-control does the advocate of bodily pleasures pursue their joys! And how pestilent is the eloquence of the ambitious in urging toward honour! Against all these, watchful care, all-night prayer, and eternal confession toward God will fight. Because of these destructions of our faith and eternal salvation, then, the prophet will be understood to pray in the psalm in his own person, showing how far it befits us to hope in God.
63.6CSEL 22:227–229
Ait enim: exaudi, deus, orationem meam, cum tribulor; a timore inimici eripe animam meam. ingruentibus his, quae superius memorauimus, per quae fides nostra et spes periclitatur, ad eum, qui solus mederi his potest, referatur oratio. metus est enim, ne infirmam per naturam et consortium carnis animam undique subrepentium inlecebrarum aestus absorbeat. adsunt namque cotidie et pugnant blandimentis fallacibus, quasdam machinas excidii admouentes. itaque per doctrinam caelestis eruditionis peruigilem curam fidei inpendere admonemur, timere insidiantem semper hostem, ne incautam securitatem nostram ipse in speculis positus incurset. uigilandum ergo in oratione dei est et semper orandum, ut, cum fatigari anima et adfligi subrepentium inlecebrarum aculeis coeperit, deus semper oratus exaudiat nosque ab his, quae timemus, eripiat. ait enim: a timore inimici eripe animam meam. deus enim non tum tantum orandus est, cum quae timentur ingruerint — et timenda sunt ea, quae, cum coeperint adesse, dominantur —, sed semper atque indefessis precibus orandus est, ut nos a timore eorum, quorum dominatum timemus, eripiat. scriptum enim in prouerbiis est: cum uocarem, non exaudistis; et cum extenderem uerba, non intendistis; sed inania fecistis consilia mea et consiliis meis non intendistis. et ego perditionem uestram inridebo. erit ergo, cum inuocabitis me, et ego non exaudiam. propheta ergo, licet prior tempore, non tamen eorum, quae postea dicerentur, ignarus est, sed inpendentibus semper tribulationibus anxius et ad omnem timorem inimici sollicitus deum orat ob ea, quae timet, et, ut secum in tribulatione sit, ut exaudiat, deprecatur. neque enim dei misericordiam metus noster, sed fides promeretur; et longae praeparationis documento opus est, ut mereamur audiri. meminit ergo propheta ab his se omnibus precatu liberari et docet orationem suam non ex dominatu eorum, quae timuerit, sed ex metu esse dominatus.
For he says: "Hear, God, my prayer, when I am afflicted; rescue my soul from fear of the enemy." When the things we mentioned above rush upon us, through which our faith and hope are endangered, let prayer be directed to him who alone can heal them. For there is fear that the surge of enticements creeping in from every side may swallow up the soul, weak by nature and by fellowship with the flesh. For they are present daily and fight with deceitful flatteries, bringing up certain engines of destruction. So we are warned by the teaching of heavenly instruction to give watchful care to faith and always to fear the enemy lying in wait, lest he, placed on the watchtowers, attack our careless security. We must watch, then, in prayer to God and always pray, so that, when the soul begins to be wearied and afflicted by the stings of creeping enticements, God, always prayed to, may hear and rescue us from what we fear. For he says: "Rescue my soul from fear of the enemy." For God is to be prayed to not only when what is feared has rushed upon us (and those things are to be feared which, once they begin to be present, dominate), but always and with tireless prayers, that he may rescue us from fear of those whose domination we fear. For it is written in Proverbs: "When I called, you did not hear; and when I stretched out my words, you did not attend; but you made my counsels void and did not attend to my counsels. And I will laugh at your destruction. It will be, then, that when you call upon me, I will not hear." The prophet, then, though earlier in time, is not ignorant of what would be said later, but, anxious at tribulations always impending and concerned at every fear of the enemy, he prays to God because of what he fears, and entreats that he be with him in tribulation and hear him. For not our fear but our faith merits God's mercy; and there is need of the proof of long preparation for us to deserve to be heard. The prophet, then, remembers that he is freed from all these by prayer, and teaches that his prayer comes not from the domination of what he fears but from fear of domination.
63.7CSEL 22:229
Ait enim: protexisti me a conuentu malignantium, a multitudine operantium iniquitatem, qui exacuerunt ut gladium linguas suas, intenderunt arcum rem amaram, ut sagittent in obscuro inmaculatum. non hic propheta arma bellica, nec ensis, aut iacula, aut tormenta arcum pertimescit. omnis enim ei in lingua timor est; huius gladios, huius spicula metuit. ab his quidem fide sua tutus est; ait enim: protexisti me a conuentu malignantium; sed arcus homicidae linguae semper intentus est et acumen gladii in lingua eius praesto est. uolant autem letales eius sagittae, et non ambiguum est, quid efficiant, scilicet ut sagittent in obscuris inmaculatum. et proprietas uerbi intellegenda est. non sanctum, non fidelem, non iustum, sed inmaculatum sagittant, eum, cui per sacramentum baptismi sordes et maculae ueterum criminum recens ablutae sunt, nondum tamen firmatae fidei, nondum doctrinis spiritalibus eruditum, nondum contra haec pugnacis linguae arma certantem, sed simplicem et ex nouae natiuitatis infantia tenerum. hunc ergo sine metu contradictionis alicuius, intento iam pridem arcu, per rerum ignorantiam in obscuro positum uulnerabunt. ait enim: subito sagittabunt eum et non timebunt, naturam simplicem et inmaculati nouitate imperitam. hanc enim fallunt, huic occultos laqueos praetendunt insidiarum secretis latentibus gloriantes.
For he says: "You have protected me from the gathering of the wicked, from the multitude of those who work iniquity, who have sharpened their tongues like a sword, they have bent the bow, a bitter thing, to shoot in the dark at the spotless one." The prophet here does not fear weapons of war, nor sword, darts, or the engines of the bow. All his fear is of the tongue; its swords, its spears he fears. From these indeed he is safe by his faith, for he says, "You have protected me from the gathering of the wicked"; but the bow of the murderous tongue is always bent and the edge of the sword is ready in its tongue. Its deadly arrows fly, and there is no doubt what they accomplish: "to shoot in the dark at the spotless one." And the proper sense of the word must be understood. They shoot not at the holy, not at the faithful, not at the just, but at the spotless: the one whose filth and stains of old crimes have been newly washed away through the mystery of baptism, but who is not yet firm in faith, not yet instructed in spiritual teachings, not yet fighting against these weapons of the combative tongue, but simple and tender from the infancy of the new birth. Him, then, without fear of any contradiction, their bow long since bent, they will wound, placed in the dark through ignorance of things. For he says: "Suddenly they will shoot him and will not fear": the simple nature, inexperienced in the newness of the spotless one. This they deceive; for this they stretch hidden snares, boasting in the secret lurking places of their plots.
63.8CSEL 22:229–230
Sequitur enim: firmauerunt sibi uerbum malum; disputauerunt, ut absconderent laqueos; dixerunt: quis uidebit eos? tempus discernitur et inferendi uulneris et consilii firmati. nam cum dicitur: subito sagittabunt, futuri temporis opus docetur; cum autem: firmauerunt uerbum malum, iam ex praeterito consilium firmatae pridem uoluntatis ostenditur. semper enim excidia aduersus fidem praesto sunt, et occultis ac fallentibus insidiis pestiferae adhortationis doli adiacent, quos a raris quibusque conspici opinantur. et ideo dictum est: absconderunt laqueos et dixerunt: quis uidebit eos? si enim haereticus peruertere fidem temptet, incredibile est quantis eam dolis subuertere contendat; si spem aeternitatis nostrae philosophus inpugnet, mirum in modum omne bonum praesentis uitae ponet in corpore: omni ingenii sui alacritate ea, quibus doctrinae caelestis institutio subrui possit, uterque scrutantes.
For there follows: "They have strengthened for themselves an evil word; they have discussed how to hide snares; they have said: Who will see them?" A distinction of time is made between inflicting the wound and the counsel strengthened. For when it is said, "Suddenly they will shoot," the work of future time is taught; but when, "They have strengthened an evil word," the counsel of a will long since strengthened is shown from the past. For destructions against the faith are always ready, and the tricks of pestilent persuasion lie in hidden and deceitful snares, which they think are seen by very few. And therefore it is said: "They hid snares and said: Who will see them?" For if a heretic attempts to pervert the faith, it is incredible with how many tricks he strives to overthrow it; if a philosopher attacks the hope of our eternity, he will marvellously place every good of the present life in the body: both of them searching out, with all the eagerness of their wit, the things by which the institution of heavenly teaching might be undermined.
63.9CSEL 22:230–231
Sed quid ad deum humana peruersitas? quid aduersus opificem operis ingenium? exquirant licet omnibus argumentationis suae quaestiunculis excidium ueritatis, deficiet tamen in ueritatis destructione falsitatis adsertio; atque ideo subsequitur: perscrutati sunt iniquitates, defecerunt scrutantes scrutinio. defectio scrutantium defectionem superuacuae contra deum adhortationis ostendit. quae enim non labefactabuntur ingenia contradictioni ueritatis intenta? rimentur licet omnia naturalium causarum secreta peruicacique studiorum suorum uigore ipsa caelestium motuum interna scrutentur, in ipsa tamen operis sui intentione deficient doctrinis spiritalibus refutati. qui enim fortuitis motibus agi omnia docent, audient a nobis aeternae uirtutis deum non in fortuitis manere, sed esse mundi creatorem indefinitae ut essentiae, ita et uirtutis; ipsum a nemine, sed ex eo omnia; moderantem ea ipsa omnia et continentem. qui uero praedicabit animae cum corpore occasum, audiet animam non esse terrenam, sed ex adflatu dei ortam elementis corporis admisceri; mortem autem non interitum esse, sed discessionem eius a corpore. qui autem resurrectionem carnis abnegabit, sciet non difficilem eius instaurationem futuram ei, cui inchoatio prima sit facilis. porro qui curam humanae conuersationis deo auferet, cognoscet aeterni regni deum iudicem; neque hominem idcirco tantum conditum, ut esset — quid enim esse hominem deo utile fuit? — sed ut in cognitionem dei editus profectum sibi ex opificis sui cognitione speraret.
But what is human perversity against God? What is the craftsman's work's wit against the craftsman? Let them seek the destruction of truth with all the little questions of their argumentation; yet the assertion of falsehood will fail in the destruction of truth; and therefore there follows: "They searched out iniquities; those who searched failed in their searching." The failing of the searchers shows the failing of a superfluous persuasion against God. For what wits will not totter that are bent on contradicting the truth? Let them pry into all the secrets of natural causes and with the obstinate vigour of their studies search the inner workings of the heavenly motions themselves; yet in the very effort of their work they will fail, refuted by spiritual teachings. Those who teach that everything is driven by chance motions will hear from us that the God of eternal power does not abide in chance things but is the creator of the world, unlimited in essence as in power; that he is from no one, but all things from him; that he governs and holds together all these very things. He who proclaims the death of the soul with the body will hear that the soul is not earthly, but arisen from the breath of God and mixed with the elements of the body; and that death is not destruction but its departure from the body. He who denies the resurrection of the flesh will know that its restoration will not be difficult for him to whom its first beginning was easy. Further, he who takes from God the care of human conduct will learn that God is the judge of the eternal kingdom; and that man was created not only to exist (for what use was it to God that man exist?) but, brought forth for the knowledge of God, to hope for advancement for himself from the knowledge of his maker.
63.10CSEL 22:231
Iam si fidem haereticus destruet, dei filium semper fuisse cognoscet, nullo a patre interuallo temporis separatum; ipsum esse uerbum, uirtutem, sapientiam dei; hunc mundi opificem fuisse, hunc et hominis conditorem; hunc prima mundi crimina diluuio abluisse, hunc Moysi legem dedisse, hunc in prophetis fuisse et per eos ingentia illa corporationis et passionis suae sacramenta cecinisse; hunc in corpore resurgentem caducae carni claritatem spiritalis gloriae intulisse et in naturam diuinitatis suae terrenae corruptionis absorbuisse primordia.
Now if the heretic would destroy the faith, he will learn that the Son of God always was, separated from the Father by no interval of time; that he is the Word, the power, the wisdom of God; that he was the maker of the world, he also the founder of man; that he washed away the first crimes of the world by the flood; he gave the law to Moses; he was in the prophets and through them sang those great mysteries of his taking a body and his passion; that, rising in the body, he brought the brightness of spiritual glory into perishable flesh and swallowed up the beginnings of earthly corruption into the nature of his divinity.
63.11CSEL 22:231–232
Deficient igitur aduersum ista scrutantes; et per uirum doctrina dei eruditum et in altum humilitatem cordis sui erigentem haec diuinae operationis praeconia proferentur, ita ut haec eminentia dei eorum ipsorum, qui haec audiant, confessione laudetur. atque ideo ita sequitur: perscrutati sunt iniquitates, defecerunt scrutantes scrutinio. accedet homo et cor altum, et exaltabitur deus. cognita enim scrutantium defectione et accedente homine cordis alti magnificentia diuinae bonitatis agnoscitur, quantus autem fiet doctrinae spiritalis profectus! nam quis non magnificabit deum, quem mundi huius cognouerit conditorem? quis non metuet quem iudicem sciet? quis non renasci in innocentiam uolet, cum peccati remissio sacramento nouae natiuitatis indulgeatur? quis non a peccato desinat iam renatus et in innocentia uolet paruuli permanere, cum talium sciat regnum esse caelorum? haec professio nostra scrutantium ingenia debilitat, haec doctrinae nostrae spicula, quae per regeneratorum exordium sagittae sunt paruulorum, stultas disputationes et ridicula de deo dogmata uulnerant. his aduersari profanae linguae contradictio non potest, aduersum omnium disputationum et adhortationum nostrarum fidem et trepidatio abnuentium et metus est audientium.
Those who search, then, will fail against these things; and through a man instructed in the teaching of God and raising the humility of his heart on high, these proclamations of divine working will be brought forward, so that this pre-eminence of God is praised by the confession of those very ones who hear them. And therefore there follows thus: "They searched out iniquities; those who searched failed in their searching. Man will draw near, and a deep heart, and God will be exalted." For when the failing of the searchers is known and a man of deep heart draws near, the greatness of divine goodness is recognized. And how great will be the advance of spiritual teaching! For who will not magnify God, knowing him as the founder of this world? Who will not fear one he knows as judge? Who will not wish to be reborn into innocence, when forgiveness of sin is granted by the mystery of the new birth? Who, now reborn, would not cease from sin and wish to remain in the innocence of a little child, knowing that the kingdom of heaven belongs to such? This profession of ours weakens the wits of the searchers; these spears of our teaching, which are the arrows of little ones through the beginning of the reborn, wound foolish disputations and ridiculous doctrines about God. The contradiction of a profane tongue cannot oppose these; against the faith of all our discussions and exhortations there is the trembling of those who refuse and the fear of those who hear.
63.12CSEL 22:232–233
Adnuntiatis enim operibus dei tunc incipient facta eius intellegi, tunc in his laetabitur iustus, tunc eum omnes recti corde laudabunt. et hoc ipsum psalmus ita edocet: accedet homo et cor altum, et exaltabitur deus. sagittae paruulorum factae sunt plagae eorum, et nihil habuerunt contra ipsos linguae eorum. conturbati sunt omnes, qui uidebant eos, et timuit omnis homo. et adnuntiauerunt opera dei et facta eius intellexerunt. laetabitur iustus in domino et sperabit in eo, et laudabuntur omnes recti corde. aduersus uulnerantes sagittas paruulorum loqui aliquid aduersantium lingua non habuit. et qui uidebant paruulos sagittantes, conturbantur et metuunt, cum se in errore sitos recognoscunt, cum diem iudicii et retributionem actae in corpore uitae agnoscunt. cum opera dei audiunt et facta eius intellegunt. in his est laetitia sanctorum, in his spes firmissima. ob haec deum qui recto corde sunt laudant, scientes esse remissorem peccatorum, mortis peremptorem et diaboli debellatorem, iudicem saeculi, aeternitatis largitorem, deum et dominum nostrum, qui est benedictus in saecula saeculorum. amen.
For when the works of God have been announced, then his deeds will begin to be understood, then the righteous will rejoice in them, then all the upright in heart will praise him. And the psalm teaches this very thing thus: "Man will draw near, and a deep heart, and God will be exalted. The arrows of little ones have become their wounds, and their tongues had nothing against them. All who saw them were troubled, and every man feared. And they announced the works of God and understood his deeds. The righteous will rejoice in the Lord and hope in him, and all the upright in heart will be praised." Against the wounding arrows of the little ones the tongue of the adversaries had nothing to say. And those who saw the little ones shooting are troubled and afraid, when they recognize that they are in error, when they acknowledge the day of judgment and the recompense of life lived in the body, when they hear the works of God and understand his deeds. In these is the joy of the saints, in these their firmest hope. For these things those who are upright in heart praise God, knowing that he is the forgiver of sins, the destroyer of death and the conqueror of the devil, the judge of the world, the giver of eternity, our God and Lord, who is blessed for ever and ever. Amen.
Tractates 64
64.1CSEL 22:233
Oportune superiorem psalmum hic, qui subiacet, consecutus est. est autem et ipse in finem et congregationem gentium, quae dominum laudaturae sunt, nuntiat; et ipse huius interpretationis nostrae fidem reddet.
Fittingly this psalm, which lies beneath, has followed the preceding one. It too is "for the end" and announces the gathering of the nations who will praise the Lord; and it too will confirm this interpretation of ours.
64.2CSEL 22:233–234
In exordio autem eius secundum consuetudinem suam propheta orationem omnem ad deum erigit. omnis enim nobis res atque sermo cum confessione dei ineundus est. sed sciens propheta, plures pro diuersitate studiorum in superuacuis demorari, specialem et proprium dei a nobis honorem requirit dicens: te decet hymnum deus in Sion. Sion mons quidem Hierusalem adiacens est; sed montem hunc eiusque nomen atque etiam urbis ipsius ecclesiam, quae corpus est Christi, nuncupatam semper accepimus, domino in psalmis dicente: ego autem constitutus sum rex ab eo super Sion montem sanctum eius. et ne in regno eum collis huius constitutum arbitraremur, in prophetis atque etiam in euangeliis dictum est: gaude ualde, filia Sion, praedica, filia Hierusalem: ecce rex tuus uenit tibi. et apostolus: ea autem, quae sursum est Hierusalem, libera est, quae est mater nostra. hymnus ergo hic deo condecet, qui sit in Sion spiritali et ecclesiastico cantico innocens et dei laudibus dulcis.
At its opening, according to his custom, the prophet raises his whole prayer to God. For every action and word of ours must be begun with the confession of God. But the prophet, knowing that many, according to the diversity of their pursuits, linger in superfluous things, requires of us the special and proper honour of God, saying: "A hymn befits you, God, in Sion." Sion is indeed a mountain next to Jerusalem; but we have always taken this mountain and its name, and also the church of the city itself, which is the body of Christ, as so named, since the Lord says in the psalms: "But I have been established as king by him over Sion, his holy mountain." And so that we should not think him established in the kingdom of this hill, it is said in the prophets and also in the Gospels: "Rejoice greatly, daughter of Sion; proclaim, daughter of Jerusalem: behold, your king comes to you." And the apostle: "But the Jerusalem above is free, which is our mother." This hymn, then, befits God, which is innocent in the spiritual song of the church in Sion and sweet with the praises of God.
64.3CSEL 22:234–235
Omnia autem superstitionum genera, quae extra religionem dei sint, condemnat plures enim sunt in demersissimo erroris profundo locati, qui doctrinae suae peruersitatem quadam inanis laboris probitate commendent. cernimus namque nudis philosophos corporibus algere; ipso etiam coniugiorum usu magi abstinent; haeretici sicco panis cibo uiuunt. sed qui tandem otiosi huius propositi profectus est? totum hoc inane atque ridiculum est et cum ipsis superstitionis causis miserabile. deo ergo uouenda sunt contemptus corporis, castitatis custodia, ieiunii tolerantia. atque ideo ait: et tibi reddetur uotum in Hierusalem. uota enim tantum ecclesiasticae religionis utilia sunt. quae cum et dignis deo cantionibus et propositae in ecclesia obseruantiae studio probabuntur, tum digni erimus, pro quibus deum sanctus spiritus interpellet idem namque per prophetam loquitur et docet. ipse autem secundum apostolum pro nobis inenarrabilibus gemitibus interpellat; atque ideo hic ita dictum est: exaudi orationem: non enim subsequitur meam, ut dicentis persona posset intellegi. licet enim multi, tamquam hoc deesset, addiderint, non tamen in authenticis extat. propheta enim non suo sensu, sed inspiratus haec loquitur: exaudi orationem.
He condemns all kinds of superstitions that are outside the religion of God. For there are many placed in the deepest pit of error who commend the perversity of their teaching by a kind of excellence of empty labour. For we see philosophers shivering with naked bodies; the magi abstain even from the use of marriage; heretics live on a dry food of bread. But what, in the end, is the advance of this idle purpose? All this is empty and ridiculous and, together with the very causes of superstition, pitiable. To God, then, are to be vowed contempt of the body, the keeping of chastity, the endurance of fasting. And therefore he says: "And to you a vow will be paid in Jerusalem." For only the vows of the church's religion are useful. When these are approved both by songs worthy of God and by zeal for the observance set before us in the church, then we shall be worthy that the Holy Spirit should intercede with God for us; for he speaks and teaches through the prophet. And according to the apostle he intercedes for us with groanings that cannot be uttered; and therefore it is said here thus: "Hear the prayer"; for "my" does not follow, so that the person of the speaker could be understood. For although many have added it, as if it were lacking, it does not stand in the authentic copies. For the prophet speaks these things not by his own sense but inspired: "Hear the prayer."
64.4CSEL 22:235–236
Sequitur, ut, quorum oratio sit exaudienda, demonstret, nec longe expectationem nostram differt; subiecit enim: omnis caro ad te ueniet. humani generis uniuersitatem scriptura sub carnis nomine designat, ut in lege: et dixit deus, non permanebit spiritus meus in hominibus istis, quoniam caro sunt, et in eadem: quoniam corrupit omnis caro uiam eius et in propheta dominus: et effundam de spiritu meo super omnem carnem et in euangelio: et uerbum caro factum est et inhabitauit in nobis. huius igitur humani generis orationem exaudiet deus, quod uanis infelicium superstitionum doctrinis tenebatur, cum praecepta gentilia omnes eos ad studium impietatis inbuerent, deum in lignis et saxis et metallis praedicando et mundi opificem atque animae nostrae parentem intra inanimem materiam collocando. hunc igitur errorem gentes fatentur, quod eos philosophiae facundia detinuerit in errore: scientes tandem uetera delicta sua et antiquae impietatis crimina deo propitianda esse per Christum. ipse enim secundum apostolum nostra placatio est, ait namque: quem proposuit deus placationem per fidem in suo sanguine et iterum: ipse est placatio pro peccatis nostris. ueniet ergo ad eum omnis caro dicens: uerba iniquorum praeualuerunt super nos, et impietatibus nostris tu propitiaberis,
It follows that he shows whose prayer is to be heard, and he does not long delay our expectation; for he added: "All flesh will come to you." Scripture designates the whole human race under the name of flesh, as in the law: "And God said, My Spirit will not remain in these men, because they are flesh"; and in the same: "For all flesh had corrupted its way"; and the Lord in the prophet: "And I will pour out of my Spirit upon all flesh"; and in the Gospel: "And the Word became flesh and dwelt in us." God, then, will hear the prayer of this human race, which was held by the empty teachings of unhappy superstitions, since pagan precepts imbued all of them with the pursuit of ungodliness, proclaiming God in wood, stones, and metals and placing the maker of the world and the parent of our soul within lifeless matter. The nations confess this error, that the eloquence of philosophy held them in error, knowing at last that their old faults and the crimes of their ancient ungodliness must be propitiated to God through Christ. For according to the apostle he is our propitiation; for he says: "Whom God set forth as a propitiation through faith in his blood"; and again: "He is the propitiation for our sins." All flesh, then, will come to him, saying: "The words of the wicked have prevailed over us, and you will be propitious to our ungodliness."
64.5CSEL 22:236–237
Sed qui tandem propitiationis effectus est? uel quid proderit errorem gentilem reliquisse et doctrinam impiam spreuisse? et idipsum non dissimulauit dicens: beatus, quem elegisti et adsumpsisti, ut inhabitet in tabernaculis tuis. omnis quidem caro ueniet, id est ex omni hominum genere congregamur, sed beatus est quisque fuerit electus. multi enim secundum euangelium uocati sunt, sed pauci electi. electi autem sunt nuptiali ueste conspicui, puro atque integro nouae natiuitatis corpore splendidi. itaque non res indiscreti iudicii electio est, sed ex meriti electu facta discretio est. beatus ergo, quem elegit deus: beatus ob id, quia electione sit dignus. scire autem nos conuenit, hic beatus in quam rem fuerit electus; scilicet ad id, quod sequitur: inhabitabit in tabernaculis tuis. omnis perfectio bonorum inhabitationis caelestis est requies. multas mansiones dominus in caelis esse testatur, sed patrem orat, ut apostoli ubi et ipse sit maneant, dicens: pater, quos mihi dedisti, uolo ut ubi ego sum, ibi et illi sint mecum. ex plurimis ergo mansionibus apostolis suis eam, quae sibi est propria, communicat. scit propheta, quanta beatitudo sit in tabernaculis dei esse, alio loco dicens: concupiscit et deficit anima mea. in atria domini. sed non ob id bonorum caelestium spes adimitur, si non omnes ad cohabitationem dei eligentur. plures enim mansiones diuersae dignitati habitantium praeparantur. sed licet diuersa sit dignitas — differt enim stella stellae in gloria — tamen quotquot habitationibus, uariis licet, digni. habebuntur, fidei fructum et honorem gloriae caelestis sortientur.
But what, in the end, is the effect of propitiation? Or what will it profit to have left pagan error and spurned ungodly teaching? He did not hide this, saying: "Blessed is he whom you have chosen and taken up, to dwell in your tabernacles." All flesh will come, that is, we are gathered from every race of men; but blessed is whoever has been chosen. For according to the Gospel many are called, but few chosen. And the chosen are those conspicuous in the wedding garment, shining with the pure and whole body of the new birth. So election is not a matter of indiscriminate judgment, but a discrimination made by the choice of merit. Blessed, then, is he whom God has chosen: blessed for this, that he is worthy of election. We ought to know for what this blessed one has been chosen: namely for what follows: "He will dwell in your tabernacles." All perfection of goods is the rest of a heavenly dwelling. The Lord testifies that there are many mansions in heaven, but he prays the Father that the apostles may remain where he himself is, saying: "Father, I will that those whom you have given me may be with me where I am." Of the many mansions, then, he shares with his apostles the one that is his own. The prophet knows how great a blessedness it is to be in the tabernacles of God, saying elsewhere: "My soul longs and faints for the courts of the Lord." But the hope of heavenly goods is not taken away if not all are chosen to dwell with God. For many mansions are prepared for the different dignity of their inhabitants. But though the dignity is different (for star differs from star in glory), yet all who are held worthy of dwellings, however varied, will obtain the fruit of faith and the honour of heavenly glory.
64.6CSEL 22:237–238
Post enim beatitudinem eius, qui ad habitandum in tabernaculis dei fuerit electus, hoc sequitur: replebimur in bonis domus tuae: sanctum est templum tuum, mirabile in aequitate. his ergo bonis domus replebuntur, quia in tabernaculis dei beatus habitabit. et quidem interim, bona domus quae sint, possumus existimare, ecclesiae scilicet munera, quae ei secundum multiplicem fructum Christus indulsit, quia et ipsa secundum apostolum domus dei est: ut scias, inquit, quemadmodum oporteat in domo dei deuersari, quae est ecclesia dei uiui, columna et firmamentum ueritatis. haec ergo habet tricenum, sexagenum centenumque fructum. his ergo bonis domus dei fides credentium explebitur, quae interim donorum diuisionibus adornatur. sicut scriptum est: huic ergo datur sermo sapientiae. alii sermo scientiae, alii fides in eodem spiritu, alii dona curationum, alii genera linguarum, alii interpretatio linguarum. uerum sunt et alia plena et perfecta domus dei munera nequaquam naturis carnalium sensuum aestimanda. nouit haec usque ad tertium caelum apostolus raptus et praedicat dicens: quod oculus non uidit, nec auris audiuit, nec in cor hominis ascendit, quse praeparauit deus his, qui diligunt eum. his igitur domus dei donis replebimur. et meritum percipiendorum horum fructuum docet dicens: sanctum est templum tuum. mirabile in aequitate. omnia namque credentium corpora. templum dei esse apostolus docet dicens: an nescitis, quod templum dei estis et spiritus dei habitat in nobis? si quis templum dei corruperit, corrumpet et hunc deus. templum enim dei sanctum est. templum ergo hoc dei templum est sanctitate atque iustitia, ut bonis domus dei repleatur, ut aequitatis ac fidei operibus mirabile sit. domum autem dei etiam ipsum adsumptum a dei filio hominem intellegere erit promptum, quia in eo inhabitet omnis plenitudo diuinitatis, et per naturae proprietatem in eo pater habitet, bonis itaque eius, id est uirtutis, gloriae, aeternitatis unoquoque eo replendo, qui se templum deo sanctum et mirabile in aequitate seruauerit. omnium itaque spes ista est, ut bonis domus dei repleamur, ut sanctum et mirabile templum illius simus. beati quidem sunt, qui iam a deo ad habitandum in tabernaculis eius electi sunt, sed festinare nos in consortium huius beatitudinis congruum est. operationibus id atque orationibus consequentes.
For after the blessedness of him who has been chosen to dwell in God's tabernacles, this follows: "We shall be filled with the good things of your house: your temple is holy, wonderful in equity." With these good things of the house they will be filled, then, because the blessed one will dwell in God's tabernacles. Meanwhile we can consider what the good things of the house are, namely the gifts of the church, which Christ has granted it in manifold fruit, since it too, according to the apostle, is the house of God: "That you may know," he says, "how one ought to behave in the house of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and foundation of truth." This house has fruit thirtyfold, sixtyfold, and a hundredfold. With these good things of God's house, then, the faith of believers will be filled, which meanwhile is adorned with the distribution of gifts, as it is written: "To one is given the word of wisdom, to another the word of knowledge, to another faith in the same Spirit, to another gifts of healing, to another kinds of tongues, to another the interpretation of tongues." But there are also other full and perfect gifts of God's house, in no way to be judged by the natures of fleshly senses. The apostle, caught up to the third heaven, knows them and proclaims them, saying: "What eye has not seen, nor ear heard, nor has it entered the heart of man, what God has prepared for those who love him." With these gifts of God's house, then, we shall be filled. And he teaches the merit for receiving these fruits, saying: "Your temple is holy, wonderful in equity." For the apostle teaches that all the bodies of believers are the temple of God, saying: "Do you not know that you are the temple of God and the Spirit of God dwells in you? If anyone corrupts the temple of God, God will corrupt him. For the temple of God is holy." This temple of God, then, is God's temple by holiness and righteousness, so that it is filled with the good things of God's house and is wonderful in works of equity and faith. It will also be ready to hand to understand as the house of God the very man assumed by the Son of God, since in him dwells all the fullness of the divinity, and the Father dwells in him by the property of nature; each person being filled with his good things, that is, of power, glory, and eternity, who has kept himself a temple holy to God and wonderful in equity. This, then, is the hope of all: that we be filled with the good things of God's house, that we be his holy and wonderful temple. Blessed indeed are those already chosen by God to dwell in his tabernacles; but it is fitting that we hasten into the fellowship of this blessedness, attaining it by works and prayers.
64.7CSEL 22:238–239
Ob quod ita sequitur: exaudi nos, deus salutaris noster, spes omnium finium terrae et in mari longe. non competit haec oratio Iudaeo. et quamquam hic liber legis sit, prophetia tamen non est gentis unius. spes enim haec omnium finium terrae est; et quacumque se habitabilis mundi huius temperies extendit, omnibus Christus in spe est. quin etiam interni atque externi maris insulae in huius nominis uirtute requiescunt. spes enim omnium finium terrae et in mari longe est. sed spem oportet non ex inani esse praesumptam, ne magis sit incertorum praesumptio, quam expectatio cognitorum.
For this reason there follows thus: "Hear us, God our salvation, hope of all the ends of the earth and of those far off on the sea." This prayer does not suit the Jew. And although this book is of the law, the prophecy is not of one nation. For this hope is of all the ends of the earth; and wherever the temperate zone of this habitable world extends, Christ is in hope for all. Indeed, even the islands of the inner and outer sea rest in the power of this name. For he is the hope of all the ends of the earth and of those far off on the sea. But hope must not be presumed from emptiness, lest it be a presumption of uncertain things rather than an expectation of known ones.
64.8CSEL 22:239–240
Itaque, cur in eo spes omnium sit, in consequentibus docet dicens: praeparans montes in uirtute tua accinctus in potentia et conturbans fundum maris, sonum fluctuum eius. ad terrenorum montium naturam sermo iste non pertinet: firmati enim sunt, non praeparati; praeparatio autem futurae operationis est coeptum. dehinc memoratorum montium praeparatio in accinctu potentiae atque uirtute est: terra autem omnis ex nihilo est iussa subsistere, resque ea potentiae non eguit accinctu, quae ex iubendi facilitate pendebat. utile est autem cognoscere, sicubi in scripturis montium facta sit mentio. ait namque propheta: audite, populi omnes, et adtendat terra et omnes habitantes in ea. et erit uobis dominus deus in testimonium, dominus deus de domo sancta sua. propter quod ecce dominus descendet de loco suo et descendet super excelsa terrae et conteret montes subtus se, et ualles liquescent, tamquam cera a facie ignis. propter impietatem Iacob haec omnia et propter peccata domus Israhel. et rursum: commota est et contremuit terra, et fundamenta montium conturbata sunt et commota sunt, quoniam iratus est eis deus. ascendit fumus ab ira eius. et ignis a facie eius exardescet, et carbones accensi sunt ab eo. et inclinauit caelum et descendit, et caligo sub pedibus eius. et in consequentibus est: misit sagittas et dissipauit eos; et fulgura multiplicauit et conturbauit eos. et. in his, quantum lectio docet, descensionem domini de caelo per prophetam spiritus sanctus ostendit, metum terrae, montium trepidationem, ob id, quia his dominus iratus sit, fumo de ira eius exorto, igne deinceps de conspectu eius accendendo. in fumo, qui ascendit, praeteriti temporis res est; in igne autem accendendo futuri significatio continetur. dehinc, ne quicquam de natura hebeti et immobili dictum existimaretur, hos montes sagittae missae dispergunt et fulgura multiplicata conturbant.
So he teaches in what follows why the hope of all is in him, saying: "Preparing the mountains in your strength, girded with power, and troubling the depth of the sea, the sound of its waves." This saying does not pertain to the nature of earthly mountains; for they have been established, not prepared; and preparation is the beginning of a future work. Then the preparation of the mountains mentioned is in the girding of power and in strength; but the whole earth was ordered to stand forth from nothing, and that thing did not need a girding of power which depended on the ease of commanding. It is useful to know where mountains are mentioned in the Scriptures. For the prophet says: "Hear, all peoples, and let the earth and all who dwell in it attend. And the Lord God will be a witness for you, the Lord God from his holy house. For behold, the Lord will come down from his place and will come down upon the high places of the earth and crush the mountains beneath him, and the valleys will melt like wax before the fire. For the ungodliness of Jacob are all these things, and for the sins of the house of Israel." And again: "The earth was moved and trembled, and the foundations of the mountains were troubled and moved, because God was angry with them. Smoke went up from his anger, and fire will blaze from his face, and coals were kindled by him. And he bowed the heaven and came down, and darkness was under his feet." And in what follows: "He sent arrows and scattered them, and multiplied lightnings and troubled them." In these, as far as the reading teaches, the Holy Spirit through the prophet shows the Lord's descent from heaven, the fear of the earth, and the trembling of the mountains, because the Lord is angry with them, smoke having arisen from his anger and fire thereafter to be kindled from his sight. In the smoke that went up is a matter of past time; but in the fire to be kindled the meaning of the future is contained. Then, so that nothing should be thought said of a dull and immovable nature, arrows sent scatter these mountains and multiplied lightnings trouble them.
64.9CSEL 22:240–241
In hoc igitur montium nomine supereminentem omnem potestatem intellegi oportet, quae se contra deum exaltans atque efferens irae dei subdidit. descendens igitur deus uerbum. adsumptum sibi hominem potentia accingens, primum haec cacumina montium depressit. diaboli scilicet et suorum contumacem excellentiam protriuit, quos per hanc primae obtritionis potestatem poenae aeterni iudicii praeparauit seruauit autem hanc eandem propheta rationem dicens: ascendit fumus ab ira eius, et ignis a conspectu eius ardescet. fumus enim eos interim arsuri ignis inuoluit, atque ob id in praesenti psalmo ita scriptum est: praeparans montes in uirtute tua accinctus potentia. accinctio potentiae ei, quod indigebat, corpori coaptatur. non enim uirtus accingitur, sed in uirtute dei potentia homo, quem dominus adsumpsit, accingitur.
By this name of mountains, then, must be understood every towering power which, exalting and lifting itself up against God, has subjected itself to God's anger. God the Word, then, coming down, girding with power the man he had assumed, first pressed down these mountain peaks, that is, he crushed the stubborn pre-eminence of the devil and his followers, whom through this power of the first crushing he prepared for the punishment of eternal judgment. The prophet kept this same reasoning, saying: "Smoke went up from his anger, and fire will blaze from his sight." For the smoke of the fire that will burn envelops them meanwhile, and so in the present psalm it is written thus: "Preparing the mountains in your strength, girded with power." The girding of power is fitted to the body, which needed it. For power is not girded, but the man whom the Lord assumed is girded with power in the strength of God.
64.10CSEL 22:241–242
Contemplandum autem est, quid praeparationem montium subsequatur: qui conturbat fundum maris, sonum fluctuum eius. conturbat non mare, sed maris fundum, neque fluctus eius, sed sonum fluctuum. mare autem, ut prophetiae sermo edocet, pro saeculo nuncupatur, ut ait: superinducet dominus machaeram terribilem et magnam super draconem serpentem prauum et perimet draconem, qui in mari est. et iterum: hoc mare magnum et spatiosum; ibi requiescet draco, quem figurasti ad inludendum illum. uel certe illud absolutius: ueni in altitudinem maris. et tempestas demersit me. montes igitur, id est aduersariae omnes supereminentesque uirtutes poenae iudicii praeparantur et maris fundamenta turbantur. in harum enim inimicarum uirtutum fiducia saeculum consistebat, et haec in inuisibilibus saeculi huius profundis latebant. sonus autem fluctuum cum fundo maris perturbatur. turbato enim diabolo omnia terroris sui ministeria turbantur: et ipse, in quo gentes pauebant, aduersantium potestatum sonus trepidat. recordemur uatum murmura et inconditos bacchantium fremitus et nonnumquam confuso audientium sensu incertum nescio quid simulacrorum sera sonuisse, omnem denique profano cserimoniorum cantu mundum resultantem; nunc uero domino Christo praedicato silere omnia confutata et trepida, cum hi templorum et gentium dii uirtute fidelium subiciuntur ad poenam, cum credentium uerbis torquentur, laniantur, uruntur et inuisibiles nobis atque inconprehensibiles naturae uerbo continentur, puniuntur, abiguntur, cum uates silent, cum muta sunt templa. per haec itaque iam iudicio praeparantur. et praeparatio ista quid proficit? profecit namque: turbabuntur gentes et timebunt: cernentes scilicet deos suos mutos et tantum ad inpositionem manuum nostrarum poenae suae uocibus ingemescentes. sed post perturbationem gentium alii timebunt; timorem enim erit inlatura turbatio. numquid omnes, qui turbabuntur, et timebunt? non utique omnes, qui turbabuntur, et timebunt.
We must consider what follows the preparation of the mountains: "who troubles the depth of the sea, the sound of its waves." He troubles not the sea but the depth of the sea, nor its waves but the sound of the waves. The sea, as the word of prophecy teaches, is named for the world, as it says: "The Lord will bring a terrible and great sword upon the dragon, the crooked serpent, and will slay the dragon that is in the sea." And again: "This great and wide sea; there the dragon will rest, which you formed to mock him." Or more plainly that saying: "I came into the depth of the sea, and the storm sank me." The mountains, then, that is, all the hostile and towering powers, are prepared for the punishment of judgment, and the foundations of the sea are troubled. For the world rested in confidence in these hostile powers, and they lay hidden in the invisible depths of this world. And the sound of the waves is troubled with the depth of the sea. For when the devil is troubled, all the ministries of his terror are troubled; and the very sound of the opposing powers, at which the nations used to tremble, itself trembles. Let us remember the mutterings of soothsayers and the disordered roarings of bacchants, and how sometimes, with the sense of the hearers confused, some uncertain sound came from images of bronze, and finally the whole world resounding with the profane chant of ceremonies; but now, when the Lord Christ is preached, everything is silent, refuted, and afraid, when these gods of temples and nations are subjected to punishment by the power of the faithful, when they are tortured, torn, and burned by the words of believers, and natures invisible and incomprehensible to us are held, punished, and driven out by a word, when the soothsayers are silent, when the temples are mute. Through these things they are already being prepared for judgment. And what does this preparation achieve? It has achieved this: "The nations will be troubled and will fear": seeing, namely, their gods mute and groaning with the cries of their punishment merely at the laying on of our hands. But after the troubling of the nations, some will fear; for the troubling will bring fear. Will all who are troubled also fear? Certainly not all who are troubled will also fear.
64.11CSEL 22:242–243
Qui ergo timebunt? qui inhabitant fines. non subiecit scriptura, ut adsolet, fines terrae; non enim hic de terrae finibus loquebatur. dehinc ergo sermonis ratio non patitur, ut id adiectum existimemus. ait enim: qui inhabitant fines. numquid et gentes, quse intra fines sunt, non timebunt, et terrarum tantum extima deum metuent, ab eius metu ceteris, quae in medio habentur, alienis? finis autem est non res ipsa, sed rei extimum. extimum uero est, in quo res ipsa deficiet. qui ergo fines inhabitant? scilicet qui in carne positi neque in totum adhuc secundum carnem agunt neque iam omnino finem peccati per desinendi a peccatis consuetudinem teneant, sed uolentes desinere nec penitus desinentes et finem etiamnunc, id est quandam proximam defectionem peccati, carnis habitantes nec a carne absunt nec in totum interna carnis exercent. apostolus autem cum in corpore sit, peregrinatur a corpore. apostolus cum in uita sit, cotidie tamen moritur; uiuit autem iam non ipse, uiuit uero in eo Christus. omnes ille fines ambiguae uoluntatis excessit, etiam extra fines corporis peccatique habitat peregrinando a corpore, dum in corpore est, et cotidie moriendo, dum uiuit, et iam non ipse in se uiuendo, sed Christus. ceterum timentium trepidatio ex ambiguae habitationis incerto est, dum adhuc habitando fines timent, nondum penitus, quod iam habitant, transeundo, et tamen desinendi uoluntate finem iam habitent desinendi.
Who, then, will fear? "Those who dwell at the ends." Scripture did not add, as it usually does, "the ends of the earth"; for here it was not speaking of the ends of the earth. So the reasoning of the discourse does not allow us to think it was added. For it says: "those who dwell at the ends." Will the nations that are within the bounds not fear, and only the extremities of the lands fear God, the rest in the middle being strangers to fear of him? But an end is not the thing itself but the extremity of the thing; and the extremity is that in which the thing itself fails. Who, then, dwell at the ends? Namely those who, placed in the flesh, neither still act wholly according to the flesh nor yet hold altogether the end of sin through the habit of ceasing from sins; but, wishing to cease and not ceasing entirely, and still dwelling at the end, that is, a kind of nearest failing of sin, of the flesh, they are neither absent from the flesh nor wholly practise the inner things of the flesh. But the apostle, while in the body, is away from the body; the apostle, while in life, nevertheless dies daily; and he lives no longer himself, but Christ lives in him. He went beyond all ends of a doubtful will, and even dwells outside the ends of body and sin, being away from the body while he is in the body, dying daily while he lives, and no longer living himself in himself, but Christ. But the trembling of those who fear comes from the uncertainty of a doubtful dwelling, while, still dwelling at the ends, they fear, not yet entirely passing beyond what they now inhabit, and yet by the will to cease they already dwell at the end of ceasing.
64.12CSEL 22:243–244
Sed uideamus, hi, qui fines habitant, cur timebunt et unde illis metus ingruat. neque id occultum est; sequitur namque: et timebunt, qui inhabitant fines, a signis tuis. metus ergo omnis a signis est. sed quae haec erunt signa? exitus matutini, et uespere delectabis. uisitasti terram et inebriasti eam, multiplicasti locupletare eam. flumen dei repletum est aqua, parasti cibum illorum, quoniam ita est praeparatio tua. ab his igitur signis metus ortus est. est enim magnum in singulis quibusque eorum signum. nam post praeparationes montium in accinctu potentiae et conturbati maris fundum et sonitum fluctuum eius progressus ecclesiae in matutinum et uespertinorum hymnorum delectationes maximum misericordiae dei signum est. dies in orationibus dei inchoatur, dies hymnis dei clauditur, secundum quod dictum est: suauis ei sit laudatio mea et rursum: eleuatio manuum mearum sacrificium uespertinum.
But let us see why those who dwell at the ends will fear and whence fear comes upon them. Nor is this hidden; for there follows: "And those who dwell at the ends will fear at your signs." All fear, then, comes from signs. But what will these signs be? "The goings out of morning, and in the evening you will delight. You have visited the earth and made it drunk; you have multiplied to enrich it. The river of God is filled with water; you have prepared their food, for so is your preparation." From these signs, then, fear arose. For there is a great sign in each of them. For after the preparation of the mountains in the girding of power and the troubling of the depth of the sea and the sound of its waves, the going forth of the church in the morning and the delights of evening hymns are the greatest sign of God's mercy. The day begins in prayers to God, the day is closed with hymns to God, according to what is said: "May my praise be sweet to him"; and again: "The lifting up of my hands as the evening sacrifice."
64.13CSEL 22:244–245
Succedit igitur et hoc sequens signum: uisitasti terram et inebriasti eam, multiplicasti locupletare eam. terra haec, qua utimur, non locupletatur, sed ex fructuum suorum ubertate locupletat. non ergo in eam sermo conueniet, quae et locupletandi se caret sensu et cuius id est, ut locupletet, officium. uisitauit autem deus terram, id est humani generis natiuitatem; eaque uisitata a deo multiplicatis gratiarum muneribus ditescit apostolo dicente: in omnibus ditati estis in ipso, in omni uerbo et scientia. his enim bonis replemur et sine cessatione potandi cotidie caelestium bonorum munus haurimus pleni diuinis copiis atque ebrii. locupletatio enim ostensa est esse ea, quae superius nuncupabatur ebrietas.
This following sign then comes next: "You have visited the earth and made it drunk; you have multiplied to enrich it." This earth we use is not enriched, but enriches by the abundance of its fruits. So the saying will not suit it, which both lacks the sense of being enriched and whose function is to enrich. But God visited the earth, that is, the birth of the human race; and, visited by God, it grows rich with multiplied gifts of graces, as the apostle says: "In everything you have been enriched in him, in every word and knowledge." For we are filled with these goods, and without ceasing to drink we draw daily the gift of heavenly goods, full and drunk with divine abundance. For the enrichment has been shown to be what above was called drunkenness.
64.14CSEL 22:245
Et locupletationis atque ebrietatis huius fructus est contuendus. et qui hic tandem sit, non tacetur: flumen dei repletum est aqua, parasti cibum illorum, quoniam ita est praeparatio tua. et de flumine ambigendi locus nullus est. ait enim propheta: fluminis impetus laetificat ciuitatem dei. et ipse dominus in euangeliis ait: qui biberit ex aqua, quam ego dedero, flumina de uentre eius fluent aquae uiuae salientis in uitam aeternam. et iterum: qui crediderit in me, sicut scriptum est, flumina de uentre eius exient. hoc autem dicebat de spiritu sancto, quem accepturi erant credentes in eum. hoc ergo flumen dei aqua repletur. spiritus enim sancti muneribus inundamur, et in nos ex illo uitae fonte fluuius dei aqua repletus infunditur. habemus etiam et cibum paratum. et quis hic cibus est? ille scilicet, in quo ad dei consortium praeparamur per communionem sancti corporis in communione deinceps sancti corporis conlocandi. id enim praesens psalmus significat dicens: parasti cibum illorum, quoniam ita est praeparatio tua: quia cibo illo quamuis in praesens saluamur, tamen in posterum praeparamur.
And the fruit of this enrichment and drunkenness must be considered. And what it is, in the end, is not kept silent: "The river of God is filled with water; you have prepared their food, for so is your preparation." And about the river there is no room for doubt. For the prophet says: "The rush of the river gladdens the city of God." And the Lord himself says in the Gospels: "Whoever drinks of the water that I shall give, rivers of living water will flow from his belly, springing up to eternal life." And again: "Whoever believes in me, as Scripture says, rivers will come out of his belly. This he said of the Holy Spirit, whom those who believed in him were to receive." This river of God, then, is filled with water. For we are flooded with the gifts of the Holy Spirit, and from that fountain of life the river of God, filled with water, is poured into us. We also have food prepared. And what is this food? That, namely, in which we are prepared for fellowship with God through communion of the holy body, to be placed thereafter in the communion of the holy body. For the present psalm signifies this, saying: "You have prepared their food, for so is your preparation": because by that food, though we are saved in the present, we are nevertheless prepared for the future.
64.15CSEL 22:245–246
Seruat autem consuetudinem suam propheta, ut tempora. de quibus loquitur, distinguat. superior namque sermo tamquam de praeterito fuit; quae autem adhuc gerenda erant. gerendorum fide et scientia tamquam iam gesta memorauit. ut autem ea omnia futuri temporis doceret esse, ait: riuos eius inebria, multiplica generationes eius: in stillicidiis eius laetabitur, cum exorietur. omnis hic orantis est sermo et, ut ea, quae commemorata sunt, deus expleat, deprecantis. terra autem uisitata inebriata est; et quomodo nunc riui eius inebriantur? sed meminisse debemus, quod si quis ex aqua domini potauerit, Summa de uentre eius effluent: ergo potatione aquae opus est, ut flumina fluant. inebriamur autem ipsi. cum spiritum sanctum, qui flumen est nuncupatus, accipimus. dehinc, quia ex nobis diuersi gratiarum riui emanant, orat propheta, ut hos eosdem dominus inebriet: ut his inebriatis et dono diuini muneris perfusis generationes nostrae multiplicentur, terra scilicet bona secundum euangelicam conparationem uerbi semen excipiens fructu tricesimo et sexagesimo et centesimo ditescat. est autem nobis per sacramentum baptismi renatis maximum gaudium, cum quaedam in nobis spiritus sancti initia sentimus, cum subeat nos sacramentorum intellegentia, prophetiae scientia, sermo sapientiae, spei firmitas, sanationum charismata et in daemonia subiecta dominatus. haec enim tamquam stillicidia nos penetrant, quae paulatim coepta. fructu multiplici exuberant. in his ergo stillicidiis, cum exorietur, terra laetabitur. sed stillicidia multiplicantur, ut riui sint; riui autem inebriantur, ut flumina sint.
The prophet keeps his custom of distinguishing the times of which he speaks. For the earlier discourse was as of the past; things still to be done he recorded as already done by faith and knowledge of things to be done. But to teach that all these belonged to the future, he says: "Make its streams drunk, multiply its generations; in its drops it will rejoice when it springs up." This whole is the speech of one praying and entreating God to fulfil what has been recounted. The earth, once visited, has been made drunk; and how now are its streams made drunk? But we ought to remember that if anyone drinks of the Lord's water, rivers will flow from his belly: so there is need of drinking water so that rivers may flow. And we ourselves are made drunk when we receive the Holy Spirit, who has been called a river. Then, since different streams of graces flow from us, the prophet prays that the Lord make these same drunk: so that, when these have been made drunk and steeped in the gift of the divine bounty, our generations may be multiplied, the good earth, according to the gospel comparison, receiving the seed of the word and growing rich with fruit thirtyfold, sixtyfold, and a hundredfold. And for us, reborn through the mystery of baptism, there is the greatest joy when we feel in ourselves certain beginnings of the Holy Spirit, when there comes upon us understanding of mysteries, knowledge of prophecy, the word of wisdom, firmness of hope, the charisms of healing, and dominion over subject demons. For these penetrate us like drops, which, begun little by little, overflow with manifold fruit. In these drops, then, when it springs up, the earth will rejoice. But the drops multiply so as to be streams, and the streams are made drunk so as to be rivers.
64.16CSEL 22:246–247
Consequens autem est, ut omnem expectationem nostram propheta confirmet et doceat, quid montium praeparatio, fundi maris turbatio, terrae uisitatio et eius inebriatio, fluminis plenitudo consummationis habitura sint. docet itaque in his, quae consecuntur, dicens: benedices, domine, coronam anni benignitatis tuae, et campi tui replebuntur ubertate. pinguescent fines deserti, exultatione colles accingentur. induti sunt arietes ouium, et conualles abundabunt frumento; etenim clamabunt et hymnum dicent. annum benignitatis dei ex propheticis atque apostolicis doctrinis cognouimus. dictum enim est ex persona domini: spiritus domini super me, propterea unxit me, euangelizare pauperibus misit me, praedicare captiuis remissionem et caecis uisionem, uocare annum domini acceptum et diem retributionis: annum aeterni et beati illius saeculi sine dubio declarat. namque bonitatis domini hic annus est, quo erunt indefessa illa benignae retributionis tempora auspicanda. huius igitur anni dei benedicetur corona, iucundissimus et suauissimus uisitatae terrae inebriatseque fructus. haec enim Christi est, depulsa corporum nostrorum corruptione et perempta mortis potestate, uictoria. haec corona sanctificatae terrae nostrae flore benedicta est dominus sanctorum suorum choro atque ambitu gloriosus. tunc ubertate campi replebuntur, tunc deserti fines pinguescent, tunc colles exultatione accingentur, tunc arietes ouium induentur. illud enim retributionis est tempus.
It follows that the prophet confirms all our expectation and teaches what consummation the preparation of the mountains, the troubling of the depth of the sea, the visiting of the earth and its being made drunk, and the fullness of the river will have. So he teaches in what follows, saying: "You will bless the crown of the year of your kindness, and your fields will be filled with abundance. The ends of the desert will grow fat; the hills will be girded with exultation. The rams of the flock are clothed, and the valleys will abound with grain; for they will cry out and say a hymn." We have learned of the year of God's kindness from prophetic and apostolic teachings. For it is said in the person of the Lord: "The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he has anointed me; he has sent me to bring good news to the poor, to preach release to captives and sight to the blind, to proclaim the acceptable year of the Lord and the day of recompense": without doubt he declares the year of that eternal and blessed age. For this is the year of the Lord's goodness, in which those unwearied times of kind recompense are to begin. The crown of this year of God will be blessed, the most delightful and sweetest fruit of the earth visited and made drunk. For this is the victory of Christ, when the corruption of our bodies has been driven away and the power of death destroyed. This crown, blessed with the flower of our sanctified earth, is the Lord, glorious with the choir and circle of his saints. Then the fields will be filled with abundance, then the ends of the desert will grow fat, then the hills will be girded with exultation, then the rams of the flock will be clothed. For that is the time of recompense.
64.17CSEL 22:247–248
Sed discrimen ipsius retributionis est contuendum. in campis enim, quorum in cultura usus est, ea, quae sub lege ex cultura dei fuerint, opera ubertatem consequentur. ubi autem fines deserti pinguescent, ecclesiae, quae deserta fuit diu, populus- Ius repromissionis bonis opimatur. in collibus uero exultatione accinctis gloriosa martyrum gaudia nuntiantur; hi enim sunt terris ceteris celsiores. cum autem arietes ouium induentur, aeterna illa et beata patriarcharum et prophetarum et apostolorum, qui duces gregis sancti sunt, uestis ostenditur, de qua ait beatus apostolus Paulus: oportet enim corruptibile hoc induere incorruptionem et iterum: in quo nolumus despoliari, sed superindui, ut absorbeatur hoc mortale a uita. hoc ergo indumento arietes ouium induuntur et hoc gloriosae inmortalitatis habitu uestiuntur.
But the distinction within the recompense itself must be considered. In the fields, whose use is in cultivation, the works that were done under the law from God's cultivation will obtain abundance. But where the ends of the desert grow fat, the people of the church, which was long a desert, is enriched with the goods of the promise. In the hills girded with exultation the glorious joys of the martyrs are announced; for they are higher than the other lands. And when the rams of the flock are clothed, that eternal and blessed garment of the patriarchs, prophets, and apostles, who are the leaders of the holy flock, is shown, of which the blessed apostle Paul says: "For this corruptible must put on incorruption"; and again: "In which we do not wish to be stripped but clothed over, so that what is mortal may be swallowed up by life." With this clothing, then, the rams of the flock are clothed, and with this garment of glorious immortality they are dressed.
64.18CSEL 22:248
Sed quamquam diuersa retributionum sint dona monstrata, spem tamen praeter haec non exiguam misericordiae suae deus tribuit dicens per prophetam: et conualles abundabunt frumento: humiliores scilicet, sed tamen non impiae fidei atque operis homines fructum uitae sortientur. non enim ubertate replebuntur ut campi, neque ex deserto pinguescent. neque exultatione accingentur ut montes, neque tamquam arietes ouium induentur, in quibus omnibus indefinitae gloriae munus ostenditur, sed frumento abundabunt, uiuendi scilicet substantia non carebunt, quia per infirmitatem fidei humiles sunt et editis circum se collibus uallium more depressi.
But although different gifts of recompense have been shown, yet besides these God grants no small hope of his mercy, saying through the prophet: "And the valleys will abound with grain": that is, men of humbler, yet not ungodly, faith and work will obtain the fruit of life. For they will not be filled with abundance like the fields, nor grow fat from the desert, nor be girded with exultation like the mountains, nor be clothed like the rams of the flock, in all of which the gift of boundless glory is shown; but they will abound with grain, that is, they will not lack the substance of living, since through weakness of faith they are lowly and, like valleys, pressed down by the hills rising around them.
64.19CSEL 22:248
Ac ne propheticus sermo hos campos, haec deserta, hos colles, hos arietes. haec conuallia, quae aspectui nostro subiacent. uoce et sensu carentia significare existimaretur. adiecit: etenim clamabunt et hymnum dicent, dei scilicet laudes ob haec diuersa retributionum praemia indefessis et maximis uocibus concinentes.
And so that the prophetic word should not be thought to signify these fields, these deserts, these hills, these rams, these valleys that lie before our sight, lacking voice and sense, he added: "For they will cry out and say a hymn," singing, that is, the praises of God with tireless and very loud voices for these different rewards of recompense.
Tractates 65
65.1CSEL 22:248–249
Superscriptio psalmi a superiore eo distat, quod in se habet canticum psalmi, cum in anteriore psalmus cantici editus sit. ceterum aequabiliter praescribuntur in finem. itaque secundum illam, quam in exordio attulimus. de titulorum inscriptione rationem perspicuum est psalmum hunc ob adepta per meritum boni operis spiritalis doctrinae instituta cantari: quia quando in superscriptione psalmus cantici est, per cognitionum caelestium praedicationem gesta boni operis continentur in psalmo; cum autem canticum psalmi est, ex operationis oboedientia adeptae spiritalis scientiae hymnus ostenditur. canticum enim uocis officium est; psalmus autem ex coaptatione, quam harmoniam nuncupant, organi conparatur. fitque ex inparibus ac dissimilibus modis artificis ingenio apta et consonans et amoena modulatio. quo exemplo uariis officii nostri et scientiae ministeriis gratum deo opus et sibi consonans conparamus. et huius quidem intellegentiae ipsi nobis psalmi auctores erunt, cum quando sit in psalmo cantici per scientiae et cognitionis doctrinam boni operis praedicatio, in cantico uero psalmi per gestorum meritum gratulatio adeptae scientiae intellegatur. ob eam igitur causam in psalmo praesenti spiritus prophetiae a gratulationis doctrina coepit. psalmum autem ex prophetarum persona consistere, res ipsa et ratio demonstrat.
The title of this psalm differs from that of the previous one in that it has “a song of a psalm,” whereas the previous one was issued as “a psalm of a song.” Otherwise both are headed alike, “To the end.” So, by the account of the inscription of titles that we gave at the beginning, it is clear that this psalm is sung on account of the teachings of spiritual doctrine obtained through the merit of good work. For when the title is “a psalm of a song,” the psalm contains the deeds of good work by way of the proclamation of heavenly knowledge; but when it is “a song of a psalm,” what is shown is a hymn of the spiritual knowledge obtained from obedience in action. A song is the work of the voice; a psalm is produced from the fitting together of an instrument, which they call harmony, and by the craftsman’s skill a fitting, consonant, and pleasing melody is made out of unequal and unlike notes. By this example we too produce, out of the various services of our duty and our knowledge, a work pleasing to God and consonant with itself. The psalms themselves will be our authorities for this understanding: in “a psalm of a song” the proclamation of good work is understood through the teaching of knowledge and understanding, and in “a song of a psalm” the thanksgiving for knowledge obtained through the merit of deeds. For this reason the spirit of prophecy began the present psalm with the teaching of thanksgiving. That the psalm is spoken in the person of the prophets, the matter itself and reason show.
65.2CSEL 22:249–250
Iubilate deo omnis terra, psalmum dicite nomini eius, date gloriam laudationi eius. dicite deo: quam terribilia sunt opera tua! in multitudine uirtutis tuae mentientur tibi inimici tui. primum ergo iubilandum deo praemonet, secundo psallendum nomini eius, dehinc dandam gloriam laudationi eius, tum dicendum deo: quam terribilia sunt opera tua! postremo id confitendum: in multitudine uirtutis tuae mentientur tibi inimici tui. sed ut rationem atque ordinem ita dispositi huius sermonis intellegamus, necessarium est id, quod difficultatem adfert, paucis absoluere.
“Shout for joy to God, all the earth; sing a psalm to his name; give glory to his praise. Say to God: How terrible are your works! In the greatness of your power your enemies will lie to you.” First, then, he warns that we must shout for joy to God; second, that we must sing psalms to his name; next, that we must give glory to his praise; then that we must say to God, “How terrible are your works!”; and last, that we must confess this: “In the greatness of your power your enemies will lie to you.” But in order to understand the reason and order of a speech arranged in this way, we must first briefly clear up what causes difficulty.
65.3CSEL 22:250–251
In latinis codicibus ita legimus: iubilate deo omnis terra. et quantum ad eloquii nostri consuetudinem pertinet. iubilum pastoralis agrestisque uocis sonum nuncupamus, cum in solitudinibus aut respondens aut requirens per significantiam ductae in longum et expressae in nisum sonus uocis auditur. in graecis uero libris, qui ex hebraeo proximi sunt, non eadem significantia scribitur. namque ita se habent: ἀλαλάξατε τῷ θεῷ πᾶσα ἡ γη̃; et cum illis alalagmos, quem latine iubilum ponunt, significat uocem exercitus proeliantis, aut in concursu proterentis hostem, aut successum uictoriae exultationis uoce testantis. quam rem, ubi ita se translationis ratio temperauit absolutius in psalmo altero intellegemus, cum dicit: omnes gentes, plaudite manibus, iubilate deo in uoce exultationis. uox autem exultationis dissentit ab iubilo; sed pro translationis condicione, quia propria exultantis uocis nuncupatio non reperta est, per id, quod iubilum dicitur, uox exultantis ostenditur.
In the Latin manuscripts we read: “Shout for joy (iubilate) to God, all the earth.” As far as the custom of our speech goes, we call iubilum the sound of a shepherd’s or a countryman’s voice, when in lonely places, either answering or calling, the sound of a voice is heard drawn out long and pressed out with effort to carry its meaning. But in the Greek books, which are closest to the Hebrew, the word does not have the same meaning. They read: alalaxate tō theō pasa hē gē; and with them alalagmos, which the Latins render iubilum, means the shout of an army in battle, either in the charge as it tramples the enemy, or as it testifies to the success of victory with a cry of exultation. Where the translation has been adjusted in this way, we shall understand more plainly in another psalm, when it says: “All nations, clap your hands; shout for joy to God with the voice of exultation.” The voice of exultation differs from a iubilum; but by the necessity of translation, since no proper name for the voice of one exulting was found, the voice of one exulting is shown by what is called iubilum.
65.4CSEL 22:251
Positi igitur in uitae istius proeliis et in hoc carnis et sanguinis nostri certamine aduersum diabolum exercitusque eius armis spiritalibus dimicantes deo monemur in uoce exultationis iubilare. et ne ad inanimem hanc terrae molem esset sermo referendus, uniuersitas nostra ex terra in primo Adam parente genitorum sub plurali numero monstratur, cum dicitur: iubilate deo omnis terra. simul enim et officium omnium docetur et origo. terrendus ergo est confessionis nostrae sermone omnis profanus auditor; et aduersum diabolum armaque eius orationum nostrarum sonitu certandum est, et belli nostri uictoria exultationis uoce monstranda est.. audiat orantis populi consistens quis extra ecclesiam uocem, spectet celebres hymnorum sonitus et inter diuinorum quoque sacramentorum officia responsionem deuotae confessionis accipiat. necesse est terreri omnem aduersantem et bellari aduersus diabolum uincique resurrectionis fide mortem tali exultantis uocis nostrae, ut dictum est, iubilo. sciet hoc deo placitum esse, hoc spei nostrae testimonium esse, publicas uictricesque exultationis nostrae uoces personare, quarum propheta non neglegens est, alio loco memorans: circumiui et immolaui in tabernaculo eius hostiam iubilationis. et ne inanem iubilationis huius doctrinam atque obseruantiam crederemus, alibi protestatur: beatus populus, qui scit iubilationem. necessarium ergo id fidei nostrae est, in cuius scientia beatitudo est.
Set, then, in the battles of this life and in this struggle of our flesh and blood, fighting with spiritual weapons against the devil and his armies, we are told to shout for joy to God with the voice of exultation. And so that the words should not be referred to this lifeless mass of the earth, all of us who were born from the earth in our first parent Adam are shown under a plural number when it is said, “Shout for joy to God, all the earth” (adorent, “let them worship”); for at once both the duty of all and their origin are taught. Every profane hearer, then, must be struck with terror by the words of our confession; we must fight against the devil and his weapons with the sound of our prayers, and the victory of our war must be shown with the voice of exultation. Let someone standing outside the church hear the voice of the people at prayer; let him observe the crowded sound of the hymns, and, amid the offices of the divine sacraments, let him catch the response of devout confession. Every adversary must be struck with terror, war must be waged against the devil, and death must be overcome by faith in the resurrection with such a shout, as has been said, of our exultant voice. He will know that this pleases God and that this is the testimony of our hope: that the public, victorious voices of our exultation resound. The prophet is not unmindful of them, saying in another place: “I went round and offered in his tabernacle a sacrifice of jubilation.” And lest we should think this teaching and practice of jubilation empty, he declares elsewhere: “Blessed is the people that knows jubilation.” It is therefore necessary to our faith, since blessedness lies in the knowledge of it.
65.5CSEL 22:251–252
Nam primum in admonitionum ordine propheta disposuit, ut iubilet deo omnis terra, secundo, ut psalmum dicat nomini eius. deo itaque iubilandum est, quia debitum ei a nobis est exultantis uocis officium. psallendum autem nomini eius est, quia, ut per organum psalmus est, ita et corporis nostri, quod animae et adfectionis et negotiorum omnium organum est, artificiosis operibus est placendum. digne ergo dei nomine agendum est, ut in quantum effici licet, dictis domini obsecundemus dicentis: sic luceat lumen uestrum coram hominibus, ut uideant opera uestra bona et magnificent patrem uestrum, qui in caelis est. uitae enim nostrae honestas ad eius laudem erit referenda, cui uiuimus. denique idipsum ex subiectis docetur. sequitur enim: psallite nomini eius, date gloriam laudationi eius, quia ex organi nostri psalterio, id est corporis animae famulantis effectibus praebetur per nos deo gloriosa laudatio, cum gentes opera nostra contuentes patrem nostrum, qui in caelis est, magnificent. et dabitur laudi eius gloria, si digne nomini eius organi, id est corporis nostri, operatione psallamus.
For in the order of his admonitions the prophet set first that all the earth should shout for joy to God, and second that it should sing a psalm to his name. We must shout for joy to God, because the service of an exultant voice is owed to him by us. But we must sing psalms to his name because, as a psalm comes through an instrument, so we must please him by the skilled works of our body, which is the instrument of the soul, of its affections, and of all its business. We must therefore act in a way worthy of the name of God, so that, as far as we can, we comply with the words of the Lord, who says: “So let your light shine before men, that they may see your good works and glorify your Father who is in heaven.” For the integrity of our life is to be referred to the praise of him for whom we live. This very thing is taught by what follows: “Sing psalms to his name; give glory to his praise”; because from the psaltery of our instrument, that is, from the works of the body serving the soul, glorious praise is offered to God through us, when the nations, seeing our works, glorify our Father who is in heaven. And glory will be given to his praise if we sing psalms worthily to his name by the working of our instrument, that is, our body.
65.6CSEL 22:252–253
Docemur etiam consequentibus monitis ad ordinem quae propheta uel spiritu per prophetam ita admonente: dicite deo: quam terribilia sunt opera tua! quis enim non trepidet ad maiestatem eius, qui saecula instituerit, mundum condiderit, tempora reuolubili uicissitudine cursuque dimensus sit, caelum astris ornauerit, terram fructibus repleuerit. mare obicibus concluserit, hominem ut his aut uteretur aut dominaretur elegerit? per haec enim omnia uirtutis ac potestatis eius aeternitas noscitur, apostolo dicente: quae enim inuisibilia eius, a creatura mundi ipsius factis intellecta aspiciuntur, aeterna quoque uirtus eius et diuinitas. haec terribile nomen conditoris efficiunt, et operum dignitas maiestatem eius, qui ea sit operatus, ostendit. horum igitur operum esse deus a nobis praedicandus est et a ceteris confitendus est: non haec omnia esse dii mentienda sunt.
We are also taught by the admonitions that follow in order, the prophet, or rather the Spirit through the prophet, admonishing thus: “Say to God: How terrible are your works!” For who would not tremble at the majesty of him who established the ages, founded the world, measured out the times in their revolving succession and course, adorned the sky with stars, filled the earth with fruits, shut in the sea with barriers, and chose man either to use these things or to rule over them? Through all these the eternity of his power and might is known, as the apostle says: “For his invisible things, from the creation of the world, are clearly seen, being understood through the things that are made, his eternal power also and divinity.” These things make the name of the Creator terrible, and the dignity of the works shows the majesty of him who made them. God must therefore be proclaimed by us, and confessed by others, as the maker of these works; we must not lie that all these things are gods.
65.7CSEL 22:253
Alii enim fortuito haec extitisse commemorant, alii aeterna mansisse confirmant. et idcirco mundum ipsum deum esse contendunt, dum aut suapte, cum uoluit, potestate constiterit, ant, dum initio caret, careat dominantis arbitrio. alii autem solum caelum, quia igneum sit, alii aera. quia motu ac natura indissecabili circumferatur, alii aquas, quia indefessae ecfluant, deum nuncupant. plures terrae metalla, robora, scopulos, herbas deos adorauerunt. nonnulli deos esse aut putrefactorum corporum ossa, aut deflagrantium rogorum busta mentiti sunt: horum omnium conditorem deum nescientes. et idcirco talem confessionis nostrae ordinem propheta esse docuit oportere: dicite deo: quam terribilia sunt opera tua! in multitudine uirtutis tuae mentientur tibi inimici tui: ex multitudine scilicet uirtutum dei uenerationem falsorum in diis nominum mentientes.
For some say that these things came into being by chance; others assert that they have always existed. And for this reason they maintain that the world itself is God, since it either came to be by its own power when it willed, or, since it has no beginning, it has no ruler’s will over it. Others call only the sky God, because it is fiery; others the air, because it is carried round by a motion and nature that cannot be cut; others the waters, because they flow without tiring. Many have worshiped the metals of the earth, oaks, rocks, and herbs as gods. Some have falsely declared to be gods either the bones of rotted bodies or the ashes of burned-out pyres, not knowing God, the maker of all these. And for this reason the prophet taught that the order of our confession must be this: “Say to God: How terrible are your works! In the greatness of your power your enemies will lie to you”; that is, from the greatness of God’s powers they falsely transfer worship to false names of gods.
65.8CSEL 22:253–254
Sed quia mentientur inimici, quid a cunctis fieri oporteat, doceturita: omnis terra adorent tibi et psallant tibi: psalmum dicant nomini tuo, altissime. mendacio inimicorum in nuncupatis diis demonstrato salutis nostrae instituta praebentur: ut terrena omnis origo nostra adoret et psallat altissimo, uerum deum et uniuersorum conditorem relictis impietatum mendaciis recognoscens.
But since the enemies will lie, what all must do is taught thus: “Let all the earth worship you and sing psalms to you; let them sing a psalm to your name, O Most High.” Once the lie of the enemies about their so-called gods has been exposed, the rules of our salvation are given: that all our earthly race should worship and sing psalms to the Most High, abandoning the lies of impiety and acknowledging the true God, maker of all things.
65.9CSEL 22:254
Sensum diapsalma distinxit. sermo enim ad deum cum oratione directus ad homines nunc refertur, quos tamquam longe a cognitione dei consistentes propheta ad proximum aduocat dicens: uenite et uidete opera dei. docuit autem et apostolus esse plures longe a deo positos, quos doctrinae? adhortatio tamquam in uicinia conlocauerit, cum ait: et cum uenisset, euangelizauit pacem his, qui de longe, et pacem his, qui de prope. ex lege enim multi tamquam de prope manentes crediderunt gentibus longe aduocatis.
The diapsalma marked off the sense. For the speech that had been addressed to God as a prayer is now turned to men, whom the prophet, as though they stood far from the knowledge of God, calls nearer, saying: “Come and see the works of God.” The apostle too taught that there are many placed far from God whom the exhortation of his teaching has brought, as it were, into the neighborhood, when he says: “And when he came, he preached peace to those who were far off and peace to those who were near.” For many believed from the law, as though dwelling near, while the nations were called from far away.
65.10CSEL 22:254–255
Prophetica igitur praedicatio omnes ad dei opera contuenda aduocauit: sed non ea opera, quae cunctorum aspectui subiecta sunt, caeli, aeris, terrae ac maris — haec enim omnes contuentur —, sed ea, quae fidelium tantum studiis conperta sunt quibusque saluti humanae cum ingenti admirabilium uirtutum terrore consultum est: pharaone impietatis suae poenis in exemplum humani timoris coercito, ut terror damnationis inreligiosorum metu religionem inchoaret; cum in terrae iter mare aruit et aquae in aridam conuersae sunt; cum Iordanen pedes populus egressus est, et ingressuro repromissionis terram Israhel fluentibus stare iussis relicus ad gradiendi securitatem fluuii alueus decucurrit. ad huius igitur legis et prophetarum dei opera contuenda propheta gentes aduocat dicens: uenite et uidete opera dei; terribilis in consiliis super filios hominum. qui conuertit mare in aridam, in flumine pertransibunt pede. ipse enim deus esse intellegendus est, ex cuius terribilibus consiliis humanae saluti per haec opera consultum est: ut opinionem de deo — quia nemo caelum contuens deum esse non sentiet — scientia nobis et cognitio talium operum de auctore confirmet.
The prophetic preaching, then, called all to look upon the works of God: not those works that lie open to everyone’s sight, sky, air, earth, and sea (for all look on these), but those that are known only to the zeal of the faithful, by which, with great terror at wonderful powers, provision was made for human salvation: when Pharaoh was restrained by the punishment of his impiety as an example for human fear, so that the terror of the condemnation of the irreligious might begin religion through fear; when the sea dried up into a road on land and the waters were turned into dry ground; when the people crossed the Jordan on foot, and, as Israel was about to enter the land of promise, the flowing waters were ordered to stand and the rest of the river’s bed ran down, so that they could walk in safety. To look upon these works of God, of the law and the prophets, the prophet calls the nations, saying: “Come and see the works of God; terrible in his counsels over the sons of men; who turns the sea into dry land; they will pass through the river on foot.” For he must be understood to be God from whose terrible counsels provision was made by these works for human salvation; so that the knowledge and recognition of such works may confirm for us, as to their author, the opinion we hold about God (for no one looking at the sky will fail to sense that God exists).
65.11CSEL 22:255–256
Verum haec, quamuis uirtutum dei opera sint, non tamen spei et saluti satisfaciunt uniuersorum. populo enim tantum legis mare in terram demutatum est eiusque itineri Iordanes aruit. sed quid hoc ad uniuersae terrae salutem proficit omnibus enim hoc, quod uenite dictum est, competit; quia de uniuersis praescriptum erat: omnis terra adorent tibi. quid ergo mihi ad salutem tanto postea genito Iordanes tum arefactus inpertit? inpertit plane. huius enim primum aquis peccatorum ablutio Iohanne paenitentiam praedicante donata est: et per quem populo in repromissionis terram iter fuerat, per eum uia nobis caelestis regni et in nouae generationis lauacro possessio aeternorum corporum inchoatur aquis ipsis baptismo domini consecratis. ob quod ad id, quod dictum erat: uenite et uidete opera domini, quam terribilis in consiliis super filios hominum. qui conuertit mare in aridam, in flumine pertransibunt pede, ne ab his, quae antea gesta sunt, spei nostrae esset intercisa securitas, cum de futuro transibunt dixisset, ideo subiectum est: ibi laetabimur in ipso. per bas enim Iordanis aquas in illa, quae a prophetis promissa sunt, terra' bona gressu abluendorum corporum transitum est atque transitur; et ibi caelestis sacramenti exordiis laetamur. cuius laetitia' et tempus et causam alius propheta testatur dicens: laetare desertum sitiens, et exultet desertum et floreat tamquam lilium, et ecfloreant et exultent deserta Iordanis. inualescite manus inualidae et genua dissoluta, consolamini modici animi, sensu conualescite, nolite timere. ecoe deus iudicium reddet, ipse ueniet et saluabitnos. tunc aperientur oculi caecorum, et aures surdorum audient, et audietur lingua mutorum. tunc saliet claudus tamquam ceruus. hoc ergo illud est, quod significatur: ibi laetabimur in ipso. quae in aduentu domini et Iordanis baptismo et infirmitatum omnium curatione expleta sunt. quod autem ibi laetabimur, ad Iordanen pertinet. ita enim dictum est: in flumine pertransibunt pede, ibi laetabimur.
Yet these, although they are works of God’s power, do not satisfy the hope and salvation of all. For the sea was changed into land only for the people of the law, and the Jordan dried up only for their journey. What does this contribute to the salvation of the whole earth? For “Come” applies to all, since it had been written of all: “Let all the earth worship you.” What, then, does the Jordan dried up at that time give to me for salvation, born so long after? It certainly does give. For in its waters first the washing away of sins was granted, when John preached repentance; and by that through which the people had had their way into the land of promise, the way into the heavenly kingdom, and in the bath of the new birth the possession of eternal bodies, is begun for us, the waters themselves having been consecrated by the Lord’s baptism. Therefore, to what had been said, “Come and see the works of the Lord, how terrible in his counsels over the sons of men; who turns the sea into dry land; they will pass through the river on foot,” there was added, so that the security of our hope should not be cut off from what was done before, since he had said “they will pass” of the future: “There we shall rejoice in him.” For through these waters of the Jordan the passage was made, and is made, into those good things of the land promised by the prophets, by the step of bodies being washed; and there we rejoice in the beginnings of the heavenly mystery. The time and cause of this joy another prophet testifies, saying: “Rejoice, thirsty desert; let the desert exult and blossom like the lily; let the deserts of the Jordan blossom and exult. Be strong, weak hands and loosened knees; take comfort, you of little courage; be strong in mind; do not fear. Behold, God will render judgment; he himself will come and save us. Then the eyes of the blind will be opened, and the ears of the deaf will hear, and the tongue of the dumb will be heard. Then the lame will leap like a deer.” This, then, is what is meant by “There we shall rejoice in him”; these things were fulfilled at the coming of the Lord, in the baptism of the Jordan, and in the healing of every infirmity. And “there we shall rejoice” refers to the Jordan, for it was said thus: “They will pass through the river on foot; there we shall rejoice.”
65.12CSEL 22:256–257
Quod autem in ipso, quis iste sit, in quo laetabimur in ipso, propheta subiecit dicens: qui dominabitur in potentia sua in aeternum, non ambigemus, quis iste erit, si dicti huius euangelici recordemur: data est mihi omnis potestas in caelo et in terra: euntes nunc docete omnes gentes et apostoli dicentis: propter quod exaltauit eum deus et donauit illi nomen, quod est super omne nomen, ut in nomine Iesu omne genu flectat, caelestium et terrestrium et infernorum. et omnis lingua confiteatur, quia dominus Iesus in gloria dei patris est. et haec non de diuinitatis suae dicta sunt potestate. illa enim, ut semper est dominans, ita et dominabitur semper: sed in aeternam gloriam eius adsumptse ex uirgine carnis natura transfertur. Iesus enim eius hominis, qui ex Maria natus est, nuncupatio est; et Iesu nomen, quod super omne nomen est, donatur. non enim hic, ut in ceteris, Iesu Christo, sed Iesu tantum. ei enim a caelestibus et terrestribus et infernis adorato et per omnem linguam in dei patris gloria esse confesso aeterni regni donatur arbitrium. sed ut in pluribus, nunc quoque latinitas nostra non satis proprie significationem dicti graeci elocuta est. quod enim nobiscum scribitur: qui dominabitur in uirtute sua in aeternum, in graecis ita legitur: τῷ δεσπόζοντι ἐν τῇ δυναστείᾳ αὐτοῦ τοῦ αἰω̃νος. quod nobiscum in aeternum, id simplex et in omne tempus sine definitionis alicuius proprietate commune est: quod cum illis τοῦ αἰῶνος, id certi et designati saeculi significationem habet.
As to “in him,” who it is in whom “we shall rejoice in him,” the prophet added, saying: “who rules in his power for ever.” We shall not be in doubt who this will be if we recall this saying of the Gospel: “All power has been given to me in heaven and on earth; go now, teach all nations,” and the apostle’s: “Therefore God exalted him and gave him the name that is above every name, that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven and things on earth and things under the earth, and every tongue confess that the Lord Jesus is in the glory of God the Father.” And these words were not said of the power of his divinity; for that, as it always rules, so it will always rule. Rather, the nature of the flesh taken from the Virgin is carried over into his eternal glory. For “Jesus” is the name of the man who was born of Mary, and the name Jesus, which is above every name, is given to him. Here it is not, as elsewhere, “Jesus Christ,” but “Jesus” alone. To him, worshiped by things in heaven, on earth, and under the earth, and confessed by every tongue to be in the glory of God the Father, the authority of the eternal kingdom is given. But, as in many places, our Latin here too has not expressed the meaning of the Greek word properly enough. For where we have “who rules in his power for ever,” the Greek reads: tō despozonti en tē dynasteia autou tou aiōnos. Our “for ever” is simple and common to all time, without any particular limitation; theirs, tou aiōnos, carries the sense of a fixed and designated age.
65.13CSEL 22:257–258
Unigenitus enim dei filius etsi regnauit semper, non tamen semper regnauit in corpore. ergo ubi designati et tamquam demonstrati saeculi dominatio per id, quod τοῦ αἰῶνος dicitur, uirtute uerbi ipsius continetur, tempus illud ostenditur, quo glorificato in gloriam dei corpori et nomen dei donatur et regnum. et huius quidem dominandi saeculi tempus absolute apostolus docet dicens: cum euacuauerit omnem principatum et potestatem et uirtutem, et nouissima inimica deuincetur mors; tunc solus in uirtute sua saeculi dominabitur. nunc enim quamuis regnet, tamen princeps huius saeculi petiit, ut modo tritici apostolos cerneret; et sunt spiritales nequitiae in caelestibus, aduersum quas spiritalibus nos armis beatus Paulus instruxit, aduersum quas militantes nos fidei nostrae angeli, qui secundum euangelia cotidie in caelis deum patrem uident, prosecuntur et misericordia dei protegit.
For the only-begotten Son of God, although he always reigned, did not always reign in the body. So where the rule over a designated and, as it were, pointed-out age is contained in the force of the very word tou aiōnos, that time is shown in which, his body having been glorified into the glory of God, both the name of God and the kingdom are given to it. The apostle teaches plainly the time of this ruling over the age, saying: “When he has destroyed every principality and power and virtue, and the last enemy, death, is overcome”; then he alone will rule the age in his power. For now, although he reigns, the prince of this world asked to sift the apostles like wheat; and there are spiritual wickednesses in the heavenly places, against which blessed Paul equipped us with spiritual weapons; and as we fight against them the angels of our faith, who according to the Gospels daily see God the Father in heaven, escort us, and the mercy of God protects us.
65.14CSEL 22:258–259
Atque ob id consequitur: oculi eius super gentes respiciunt. ab omni enim in peccatis morante uultus domini auersus est. haec namque indemutabilis dei significata conuersio est: non quod tamquam per naturam corporalem se quoquam aut auertat aut referat, sed quod par atque idem aequaliter semper manens uniuscuiusque auxilio pro meritorum diuersitate aut desit aut adsit. ex persona enim peccatorum ita scriptum est: auerte faciem tuam a peccatis eorum et iterum: quare auertis faciem tuam et dexteram tuam? et rursum: auertisti faciem tuam, et factus sum conturbatus. ubi autem iustorum persona tractatur. haec dicta sunt: oculi domini super iustos et aures eius in preces eorum et iterum: oculi tui uideant aequitates et deinceps: designatum est super nos lumen uultus tui, domine; ergo incorporalis deus misericordiae suae oculis et tamquam ministerio famulantium angelorum protegit gentes, et in omnes credentes donum se diuinae miserationis effundit.
And therefore there follows: “His eyes look upon the nations.” For the face of the Lord is turned away from everyone who lingers in sins. This is the meaning of the turning of the unchangeable God: not that, as if by a bodily nature, he turns himself away from anyone or back again, but that, remaining always equal and the same, he is absent from or present to each one’s help according to the difference of their merits. For it is written in the person of sinners: “Turn your face from their sins,” and again: “Why do you turn away your face and your right hand?” and again: “You turned away your face, and I was troubled.” But where the person of the righteous is treated, these things are said: “The eyes of the Lord are upon the righteous, and his ears toward their prayers,” and again: “Let your eyes behold what is right,” and further: “The light of your countenance is marked upon us, O Lord.” The incorporeal God, therefore, protects the nations with the eyes of his mercy and, as it were, by the ministry of serving angels, and pours himself out on all believers as the gift of divine compassion.
65.15CSEL 22:259
Hoc Iudaei denegant, his operibus dei infidelis populus contradicit, gloriam sibi in Abraham electi generis usurpans. et consequentibus istud dictis propheta demonstrat, ad id, quod dixerat: oculi eius super gentes respiciunt, conectens istud: qui in iram prouocant, non exaltentur in se. hoc, quod in se exaltantur, dominus in euangeliis condemnat dicens: nolite praeferre inter uos dicentes: patrem habemus Abraham; potens est enim deus ex lapidibus istis suscitare filios Abrahae. quod autem in iram prouocant, omnifariam prophetae locuntur; Esaias: in iracundiam prouocastis sanctum Israhel; ad Ezechiel quoque spiritus loquitur: fili hominis mitto te ego ad domum Israhel, qui exacerbant me, et in psalmis: exacerbauerunt spiritum eius et rursum: frequenter liberaui eos, ipsi uero me exacerbauerunt omnis ergo operationem et misericordiam dei in salutem gentium denegans in iram prouocat misericordiae et salutis auctorem; quia in se gloriosi et exaltati iram eius, qui solus gloriosos potest efficere, exacerbant.
The Jews deny this; the unbelieving people contradicts these works of God, claiming for itself the glory of a race chosen in Abraham. And the prophet shows this in the words that follow, joining to what he had said, “His eyes look upon the nations,” this: “Let those who provoke him to anger not be exalted in themselves.” This being exalted in themselves the Lord condemns in the Gospels, saying: “Do not put yourselves forward among yourselves, saying, We have Abraham as father; for God is able from these stones to raise up children to Abraham.” That they provoke him to anger the prophets say in every way. Isaiah: “You have provoked the Holy One of Israel to wrath”; to Ezekiel also the Spirit says: “Son of man, I send you to the house of Israel, who embitter me”; and in the psalms: “They embittered his spirit,” and again: “Often I delivered them, but they embittered me.” Everyone, then, who denies the work and mercy of God for the salvation of the nations provokes to anger the author of mercy and salvation, because, glorious and exalted in themselves, they embitter the anger of him who alone can make men glorious.
65.16CSEL 22:259–260
Interiectio rursum diapsalmi et sensus et personae demutationem docet. nam sub hac significatione frequenter alterum, nonnumquam utrumque distinguitur. superior enim sermo ex prophetae persona omnis fuit dicentis: uenite et uidete opera dei, quam terribilis in consiliis super filios hominum; sequentem uero apostolicum esse oportebat, ut his inuitantibus, istis praedicantibus eadem doctrina ueteris ac noui testamenti praedicatio contineretur.
The insertion of a diapsalma again indicates a change of sense and of person. For under this sign often one of them, sometimes both, are marked off. The preceding speech was entirely in the person of the prophet, saying: “Come and see the works of God, how terrible in his counsels over the sons of men”; but the following had to be apostolic, so that, the one inviting and the other preaching, the proclamation of the Old and New Testaments might be contained in one and the same teaching.
65.17CSEL 22:260
Horum igitur adhortatio refertur ad gentes, cum dicitur: benedicite gentes deum nostrum. non ex inani nostrum prophetiae sermo subiecit. non utique illos, quos deos putabatis, heroum nomina uel elementorum creationes uel metallorum materiem, sed nostrum et eum, cuius opera recensentur, qui terribilis in consiliis super filios hominum, qui conuertit mare in aridam, qui dominatur in uirtute sua in aeternum. hoc autem proprie apostolicae doctrinae est, deum ex lege ac prophetis in euangeliis praedicare.
Their exhortation, then, is directed to the nations, when it is said: “Bless our God, you nations.” Not without reason did the words of the prophecy add “our”: certainly not those whom you thought gods, the names of heroes, or the created elements, or the material of metals, but ours, he whose works are recounted, who is terrible in his counsels over the sons of men, who turns the sea into dry land, who rules in his power for ever. And this belongs properly to apostolic teaching: to preach in the Gospels the God of the law and the prophets.
65.18CSEL 22:260–261
Sed id, quod consequitur: et obaudite uocem laudis eius, intellegentiam confundit. uox laudis namque non eius, qui laudatur, sed eius, qui laudet, auditur. et quomodo gentes, ut uocem laudis. obaudiant, admonentur? uerum et hic latinitas nostra proprietatem dicti in translatione non reddidit. nam hoc, quod nobiscum scribitur: et obaudite uocem laudis eius, a Graecis ita dictum est: ϰαὶ ἀϰουτίσατε τὴν ϕωνὴν τη̄ς αἰνέσεως αὐτοῦ. quo uerbo id significatur, obaudiri posse ut efficiant uocem laudis eius: quod plenius intelleget, qui meminerit dominum in euangeliis dixisse: quod dico nobis in tenebris, dicite in lumine, et quod in aure auditis, praedicate super tecta. deus namque constanti et publica praedicatione laudandus est, neque debet in commemorandis uirtutibus eius fides nostra trepidare.
But what follows, “and hear the voice of his praise,” confuses the understanding. For the voice of praise that is heard is not that of the one praised but of the one who praises. How, then, are the nations told to hear the voice of praise? But here too our Latin has not rendered the proper sense of the word in translation. What we have written as “and hear the voice of his praise,” the Greeks have said thus: kai akoutisate tēn phōnēn tēs aineseōs autou. By this word it is meant that they should cause the voice of his praise to be heard. He will understand this more fully who remembers that the Lord said in the Gospels: “What I tell you in the darkness, speak in the light; and what you hear in the ear, preach on the housetops.” For God is to be praised with steady and public preaching, and our faith must not tremble in recounting his powers.
65.19CSEL 22:261
Sed quae tandem uox laudis eius audiri efficienda est? nempe ea, quod credentium animam posuerit in uitam, quod apostolicae praedicationi et martyrum confessioni constantiam et perseuerantiam largitus sit confitendi, quorum discursibus orbem terrae quibusdam quasi pedibus caelestis regni praedicatio transcucurrit in omnem enim terram exiit sonus eorum. et alibi spiritalis discursus gloriam clamans spiritus sanctus: quam speciosi pedes euangelizantium bona, euangelizantium pacem! haec ergo uox laudis dei praedicantium audienda praeconio est, propheta testante: qui posuit animam meam ad uitam et non dedit commoueri pedes meos. non enim humanarum comminationum terriculis a cursu praedicationis suae apostoli deflexi sunt, neque firmitas pedum insistentium a fidei gressu commota est, quin semper iudicii et aeterni regni dominum praedicarent.
But what, then, is the voice of his praise that must be made heard? Surely this: that he has set the soul of believers in life; that he granted to the apostolic preaching and to the confession of the martyrs constancy and perseverance in confessing, by whose running to and fro, as if on feet, the preaching of the heavenly kingdom ran across the whole world: “for their sound went out into all the earth.” And elsewhere the Holy Spirit, proclaiming the glory of this spiritual running: “How beautiful are the feet of those who bring good news of good things, who bring good news of peace!” This voice of the praise of God, then, is to be heard in the proclamation of the preachers, as the prophet testifies: “who has set my soul in life and has not let my feet be moved.” For the apostles were not turned aside from the course of their preaching by the scares of human threats, nor was the firmness of their planted feet moved from the step of faith, so that they always preached the Lord of judgment and of the eternal kingdom.
65.20CSEL 22:261–262
Locutus autem ex unius persona spiritus prophetiae rem ipsam non uni tantum nomini conpetere significat. nam cum dixisset: et non dedit commoueri pedes meossubiecit quoniam probasti nos, deus, igne nos examinasti, sicut igne examinatur argentum. sermo itaque coeptus ex uno refertur ad plures. est namque unus spiritus, et una credentium fides est et secundum quod in gestis apostolorum est: erat credentium anima una et cor unum. atque ita, cum ab uno coeptum designatur in plures, unanimitas docetur in pluribus. sed quae tandem conparationis similitudo est, examinatos eos igni, sicut examinatur argentum? et, ut arbitror, examinandi argenti illa sola ratio est, ut sordes, quae ex prima terrae materie adhaeserint, decoquantur, ut, quae fraudulenter ex alterius metalli natura admixta fuerint, purgentur. deus itaque credentes in se non tamquam fidei eorum ignarus examinat: sed quia etiam secundum apostolum temptatio probationem adfert, examinantur credentes non ad cognitionem dei sed, ad sui probationem, ut igne purgati et admixtione uitiorum carnalium defsecati splendeant examinatae innocentise claritate.
The spirit of prophecy, having spoken in the person of one, indicates that the matter does not apply to one name only. For after saying, “and has not let my feet be moved,” he added: “For you have proved us, O God; you have tried us with fire, as silver is tried with fire.” So the speech begun from one is carried over to many. For there is one Spirit and one faith of believers, and, as it is in the Acts of the Apostles, “the believers had one soul and one heart.” And so, when what was begun from one is applied to many, oneness of mind is taught among the many. But what likeness of comparison is it that they were tried by fire as silver is tried? As I think, the only purpose of trying silver is that the dross which has clung to it from the first material of the earth may be burned out, and that whatever has been fraudulently mixed in from the nature of another metal may be purged away. God, then, does not try those who believe in him as though ignorant of their faith; but since, according to the apostle, temptation brings proof, believers are tried not for God’s knowledge but for their own proving, so that, purged by fire and cleansed of the admixture of fleshly vices, they may shine with the brightness of tried innocence.
65.21CSEL 22:262
Temptationum autem genera et diuersas martyrum uictorias contuentes scimus, quibus modis anima ponatur in uitam, cuius contemptu desaeuientibus poenarum ingeniis a fidei gressu et testimonio non mouentur. alii enim in uinculis carcerum gloriantur, alii caesi in uerberibus gratulantur, alii potestati inreligiosorum desecanda. felicium capitum colla submittunt; plures in exstructos rogos currunt et trepidantibus poenae ministris ignem saltu deuotae festinationis insiliunt; alii in profundum demergendi non in aquas necaturas, sed in refrigerium aeternae beatitudinis decidunt toto ipso se corpore deo hostiam tamquam holocausta praebentes.
Looking at the kinds of temptations and the various victories of the martyrs, we know in what ways the soul is set in life: despising this life, they are not moved from the step and testimony of faith, however savagely ingenious the punishments. Some glory in the chains of prisons; others, beaten with scourges, give thanks; others submit the necks of their blessed heads to be cut off by the power of the irreligious; many run to the built-up pyres and, while the ministers of punishment tremble, leap into the fire with the bound of devout haste; others, about to be sunk in the deep, fall not into waters that will kill them but into the refreshment of eternal blessedness, offering their whole bodies to God as a victim, like burnt offerings.
65.22CSEL 22:262–263
Percurrit ergo per haec passionum genera ex persona apostolorum, euangelistarum, martyrum propheticus sermo dicen: igne nos examinasti, sicut igne examinatur argentum. induxisti nos in laqueum, id est in custodiae catenas. posuisti tribulationes in dorsum nostrum, poenas scilicet uerberum, quibus cum apostolis Petrus gaudet et Paulus exultat. inposuisti homines super capita nostra. transiuimus per ignem et aquam. gloriosas uidelicet martyrum mortes commemorat gladii, ignis, profundi. sed qui transit per ignem et aquam, non in his aboletur, sed in aliud per illa transducitur. et quo transducatur, propheta non nescit dicens: induxisti nos in refrigerium. huius refrigerii et in loco alio meminit dicens: conuertere anima mea in requiem tuam, quia dominus benefecit mihi. eripuit animam meam de morte, oculos meos a lacrimis, pedes meos a lapsu. bene placebo domino in regione uiuentium: animam uidelicet suam in requiem beatae illius resurrectionis hortatus, in qua post mortis istius tempus omni humanarum calamitatum labe detersa non doletur, non fletur, non peccatur, sed uiuitur. in huius igitur beatitudinis per ignem et aquam refrigerium educti sunt.
Through these kinds of sufferings, then, the prophetic speech runs on in the person of the apostles, evangelists, and martyrs, saying: “You have tried us with fire, as silver is tried with fire. You led us into the snare,” that is, into the chains of custody; “you laid tribulations on our back,” namely the punishments of scourging, in which Peter with the apostles rejoices and Paul exults; “you set men over our heads; we passed through fire and water.” He recalls, clearly, the glorious deaths of the martyrs by sword, fire, and the deep. But one who passes through fire and water is not destroyed in them, but is carried over through them into something else. And the prophet knows where he is carried, saying: “You led us into refreshment.” He mentions this refreshment in another place too, saying: “Return, my soul, to your rest, for the Lord has done you good. He has delivered my soul from death, my eyes from tears, my feet from falling. I will please the Lord in the land of the living”; urging his soul, that is, toward the rest of that blessed resurrection in which, after the time of this death, every stain of human calamities wiped away, there is no grief, no weeping, no sin, but life. Into the refreshment of this blessedness, then, they were brought out through fire and water.
65.23CSEL 22:263–264
Et ne aut pertranseuntis aquas natatus aut transilientis ignem saltus -aut introductio in refrigerium communis alicuius et terreni loci requies significari existimaretur, adiecit: introibo in domum tuam in holocaustis. holocausta sunt integra hostiarum corpora, quae, quia tota ad ignem sacrificii deferebantur, holocausta sunt nuncupata. per haec igitur genera poenarum martyres in fidei testimonium corpora sua holocausta uouerunt, ut in dei domum, id est in caelestis domicilii habitationem consummatis hostiarum suarum sacrificiis introirent.
And lest the swimming of one crossing the waters, or the leap of one jumping over the fire, or the leading into refreshment should be thought to mean the rest of some common, earthly place, he added: “I will go into your house with burnt offerings.” Burnt offerings (holocausta) are the whole bodies of victims, which were called holocausts because they were brought entire to the fire of sacrifice. Through these kinds of punishment, then, the martyrs vowed their bodies as burnt offerings in testimony to the faith, so that, the sacrifices of their offerings completed, they might enter the house of God, that is, the dwelling of the heavenly home.
65.24CSEL 22:264–266
Sed quid tandem in hac corporum suorum oblatione uouerunt? scilicet ut per haec martyrii sui exempla gentes ad spem regni aeterni erudirent. qui enim tum Christum praedicabant, non sibi, quibus tum erat cognitus, sed nobis, qui futuri adhuc eramus, uel quibus tum erat incognitus, praedicabant. quae eorum praedicatio omnis posteritatis fidem ad martyrii desiderium accendit. non enim causa alia praedicabant nisi ut fidei suae et martyrii exemplo plures martyres erudirent quod Paulus docuit dicens: ego Paulus uinctus Iesu pro uobis gentibus. atque ob id in huius praedicationis fructu deo se uota reddere confitentur dicentes: reddam tibi uota mea, quae distinxerunt labia mea. et locutum est os meum in tribulatione mea: holocausta medullata offeram tibi cum incenso et arietibus, offeram tibi boues cum hircis. an ignorat propheta ex persona dei in spiritu se locutum: non accipiam de domo tua uitulos neque de gregibus tuis hircos et: numquid manducabo carnes taurorum aut sanguinem hircorum potabo? et rursum: quoniam si uoluisses sacrificium, dedissem utique, holocaustis autem non delectaberis? cessat igitur opinionis nostrae error, ut haec uouisse martyres existimemus. sed in martyriis posterum reddent deo quse locuti sunt uota, ipsi quidem se primum deo uouentes et se ipsos holocausta praebentes, quia in his domum dei introibunt in passionum suarum tribulationibus Pauli uoce clamantes: quis nos separabit a caritate dei? tribulatio an angustia, aut persecutio, aut fames, aut nuditas, aut periculum? et: confido, quod neque mors, neque uita, neque praesentia, neque futura, neque creatura alia poterit nos separare a caritate dei, quae est in Christo Iesu. hsec ergo in tribulatione primum beatorum martyrum uota sunt, quae in tribulationibus suis locuntur et spondent; tum deinde, ut ex nobis holocausta medullata consumment. medullata ob id, quia fides animae et cordis officium est-resque hsec uoluntatis internse est cum incenso quoque arietes offeruntur. quid autem sit incensum; ita hoc eodem psalmorum libro docemur: fiat oratio mea tamquam incensum in conspectu tuo, in incenso orationes intellegendas esse significans. qui uero sub arietum nomine ostendantur, anterior psalmus ostendit, cum ait: induti sunt arietes ouium; in his enim, tamquam in principibus gregum, significat sacerdotes, quos doctrinae apostolicae eruditio cum orationum odore — bonus enim secundum Paulum in Christo odor sumus — ad martyrii studium prosequitur. non solum autem arietes cum incenso offerentur, sed etiam boues offerentur; id est contumacis naturae pecora in culturam dei mitigantur in hoc martyrium Christi nominis doctrinis apostolicis edomita.
But what, then, did they vow in this offering of their bodies? Clearly, that by these examples of their martyrdom they might instruct the nations in the hope of the eternal kingdom. For those who preached Christ then preached not for themselves, to whom he was then known, but for us who were still to be, or for those to whom he was then unknown. Their preaching kindled the faith of all posterity to the desire for martyrdom. For they preached for no other reason than to instruct many martyrs by the example of their faith and martyrdom, as Paul taught, saying: “I, Paul, the prisoner of Jesus for you Gentiles.” And therefore, in the fruit of this preaching, they confess that they pay their vows to God, saying: “I will pay you my vows, which my lips uttered distinctly, and my mouth spoke in my tribulation: I will offer you burnt offerings full of marrow, with incense and rams; I will offer you oxen with goats.” Does the prophet not know that he spoke in the Spirit in the person of God: “I will not take calves from your house, nor goats from your flocks,” and: “Shall I eat the flesh of bulls or drink the blood of goats?” and again: “For if you had wished sacrifice, I would surely have given it; but you will not delight in burnt offerings”? So let the error of our opinion cease, that we should think the martyrs vowed these things. But in their martyrdoms they will afterward pay to God the vows they spoke: first vowing themselves to God and offering themselves as burnt offerings, because in these they will enter the house of God, crying out in the tribulations of their sufferings with the voice of Paul: “Who shall separate us from the love of God? Tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or danger?” and: “I am confident that neither death, nor life, nor things present, nor things to come, nor any other creature will be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus.” These, then, are first the vows of the blessed martyrs in tribulation, which they speak and pledge in their tribulations; and then, that they may complete burnt offerings full of marrow out of us. “Full of marrow,” because faith is the work of the soul and heart, and this is a matter of the inner will. With the incense, rams too are offered. What incense is, we are taught in this same book of Psalms: “Let my prayer be like incense in your sight,” meaning that prayers are to be understood by incense. And who are shown under the name of rams the previous psalm shows, when it says: “The rams of the sheep are clothed”; for by these, as the leaders of the flocks, he means the priests, whom the instruction of apostolic teaching, with the fragrance of prayers (for, according to Paul, we are the good fragrance in Christ), leads on to zeal for martyrdom. And not only will rams be offered with incense, but oxen also will be offered: that is, beasts of a stubborn nature are tamed for the worship of God, subdued to this martyrdom for the name of Christ by the apostolic teachings.
65.25CSEL 22:266
In eo autem, quod dicitur: offeram tibi boues cum hircis, uirtutem uerbi ex hebraeo in graecum demutati latinus sermo non tenuit. nam quod nobiscum est: offeram tibi boues cum hircis, cum illis ita habetur: ἀνοίσω σοι βόας μετὰ χειμάϱϱων. Χείμαϱϱοι cum graecis non proprium, sed appellatiuum nomen hircorum est et eorum maxime, qui in ipso hiemis tempore editi sint. et scriptura hoc in loco tantum χειμάϱϱους nuncupauit, ceteris autem locis τϱάγως, quos nos hircos dicimus. posuit. confirmat autem spiritalis intellegentiae sensum aliorum consonans sibi et concors translatio, qui pro χειμάϱϱοις ϰαιϱίμους transtulerunt; ϰαίϱιμοι autem significantur, qui ex ipso tempore editi sunt; χείμαϱϱοι autem, quos hiemps genuit, unde et torrentes eodem uocabulo graecitas nuncupat, quos ex nihilo in fluuios hiemps auxerit.
In the words “I will offer you oxen with goats,” the Latin has not kept the force of the word as it was changed from Hebrew into Greek. What we have as “I will offer you oxen with goats,” they have thus: anoisō soi boas meta cheimarrōn. Cheimarroi among the Greeks is not the proper but a descriptive name for goats, and especially for those born in the very season of winter. Scripture called them cheimarroi only in this place; in other places it used tragoi, which we call goats. The translation of others, which agrees and is consistent with itself, confirms the sense of this spiritual understanding: for cheimarroi they have rendered kairimoi; and kairimoi means those born at the right time, cheimarroi those that winter has produced; which is why the Greek language calls torrents by the same word, streams that winter has swelled from nothing into rivers.
65.26CSEL 22:266–267
Ergo cum ait βόας μετὰ χειμάϱϱων, non de pecudibus se loqui propheticus sermo demonstrat, sed in bubus ecclesiae se homines ostendere, in χειμάϱϱοις autem eos, quos ipsa persecutionis tempestas in martyrii gloriam genuerit. scimus enim plures sacramentorum diuinorum ignaros exemplo martyrum ad martyrium cucurrisse, et extra scientiam fidei ante uiuentes. facto. fidei praesentis edoctos, ipsam illam consummatae in martyrio fidei gloriam consecutos. qualis fuit ille, qui dominum in ipsa sua damnatione confessus est dicens: memento mei, domine, cum ueneris in regnum tuum; qui mox tale martyrii huius a domino munus accepit: amen dico tibi, hodie mecum eris in paradiso. huius igitur similes apostolicse doctrinae eruditio deo offert cum hominibus diuturnae frugiferaeque culturae, sub ipsa desaeuientis hiemis tempestate progenitos. dicente autem deo: quo mihi multitudinem hostiarum uestrarum? plenus sum, holocausta arietum et adipem agnorum et sanguinem taurorum et hircorum nolo. quis enim haec exquisiuit de manibus uestris? superfluum est existimare, in bubus et hircis tamquam perfecta sollemniorum uota placuisse.
So when he says boas meta cheimarrōn, the prophetic speech shows that it is not speaking of cattle, but that by the oxen it means the men of the church, and by the cheimarroi those whom the very storm of persecution has brought forth into the glory of martyrdom. For we know that many who did not know the divine mysteries ran to martyrdom by the example of the martyrs, and that, though they had lived before outside the knowledge of the faith, being taught the present faith by an act, they attained the very glory of the faith completed in martyrdom. Such was he who confessed the Lord in his own condemnation, saying: “Remember me, Lord, when you come into your kingdom,” and who at once received from the Lord this gift of his martyrdom: “Truly I tell you, today you will be with me in paradise.” Those like him, then, the instruction of apostolic teaching offers to God together with men of long and fruitful cultivation, born in the very storm of a raging winter. And since God says: “What is the multitude of your sacrifices to me? I am full; I do not want burnt offerings of rams, the fat of lambs, and the blood of bulls and goats. For who has required these from your hands?”, it is idle to think that perfect solemn vows were pleasing in oxen and goats.
65.27CSEL 22:267–268
Demutat, ut in ceteris, interiectio diapsalmae personam atque sensum, doctrinae tamen ordine non dissidente. postea enim quam ex persona apostolorum, euangelistarum, martyrum. prophetarum ostenderat, quibus modis anima eius posita esset in uitam, id est per passionum poenas atque mortis, per quas in locum beatitudinis transisset reddens in holocaustis deo uota, post hunc ergo sermonem, quem omnem ad deum habuerat, eos nunc, quos ad holocaustorum sollemnia erudierat, adfatur dicens: uenite et audite, et enarrabo uobis, omnes, qui timetis deum. aduocat non incertos neque ad incerta. nam qui sint, quos aduocet, docet: omnes, qui timetis deum; inreligiosis enim neque adeundi neque audiendi uoluntas est. dehinc, quid enarraturus sit, significat. quanta fecit animae meae. hanc enim posuit in uitam, hanc in refrigerium induxit, haec in holocaustis domum dei introibit.
The insertion of the diapsalma changes, as elsewhere, the person and the sense, though the order of the teaching does not break. For after he had shown, in the person of the apostles, evangelists, martyrs, and prophets, in what ways his soul had been set in life, that is, through the punishments of suffering and death, by which he had passed into the place of blessedness, paying his vows to God in burnt offerings, after this speech, all of which he had addressed to God, he now addresses those whom he had trained for the solemn rite of burnt offerings, saying: “Come and hear, and I will tell you, all you who fear God.” He calls not uncertain people, nor to uncertain things. For he teaches who they are whom he calls: “all you who fear God”; for the irreligious have no will either to come or to hear. Then he indicates what he is going to tell: “how great things he has done for my soul.” He set it in life, led it into refreshment, and it will enter the house of God with burnt offerings.
65.28CSEL 22:268
Sed ut haec animae fierent, ex causis meruit, ut fierent. quibus uero causis meruit, dicit: ad ipsum clamaui ore meo. meruit ergo bona animae, quia ad eum ore clamauit. sed clamor oris plerumque mendax est, et non semper uerborum sonus adfectum mentis nuntiat. sequi ergo clamorem oris debet et sensus: et secutus est. nam propheta conexuit: et exaltaui sub lingua mea: non in lingua, sed sub lingua, in occultis scilicet linguae et quodam intra se tacitae uoluntatis eloquio. quod idipsum in euangeliis domino placuit dicenti: intra in cubiculum tuum et claude ostium tuum et ora: et pater tuus, qui uidet in absconso, reddet tibi. ergo nunc, qui ore clamatus est, exaltatur sub lingua deus.
But in order that these things might be done for his soul, he earned by causes that they should be done. By what causes he earned it, he says: “I cried to him with my mouth.” He earned, then, good things for his soul because he cried to him with his mouth. But the cry of the mouth is often false, and the sound of words does not always announce the disposition of the mind. The mind, then, must follow the cry of the mouth: and it did follow. For the prophet joined: “and I exalted him under my tongue”: not on the tongue but under the tongue, that is, in the hidden places of the tongue and in a certain inward speech of silent will. This very thing pleased the Lord in the Gospels, who says: “Go into your room, shut the door, and pray; and your Father, who sees in secret, will reward you.” So now God, who was cried to with the mouth, is exalted under the tongue.
65.29CSEL 22:268–269
Sed qui sub lingua exaltatur. omni cordis puritate uenerandus est; nec sufficit non egisse aliquid impium, si mente cogitatur impietas. ab eo autem, qui sub lingua exaltet deum, hanc impietatis cogitationem abesse oportere propheta docuit dicens: iniustitiam si conspexi in corde meo, non exaudiat deus. propterea exaudiuit me deus, intendit uoci orationis meae. iniquitatem non modo re non effecit, sed nec corde conspexit. uel certe iniquitatem non conspexit in corde, nullum scilicet uitium iniquae suae uoluntatis in corde sno contuens: et ob id dignus audiri. in uitam enim eius anima posita est pedesque eius non commoti sunt et in refrigerium inductus est et domum dei introibit et, quae distinxerat labiis, uota persoluuit deo, honoris et gloriae confessione subnixus dicens: benedictus deus, qui non amouit deprecationem meam et misericordiam suam a me, laudem dei coeptam in exordio psalmi in fine confessus. cui gloria est in saecula saeculorum. amen.
But he who is exalted under the tongue must be revered with all purity of heart; nor is it enough not to have done anything impious, if impiety is thought in the mind. The prophet taught that this thought of impiety must be absent from one who exalts God under his tongue, saying: “If I regarded iniquity in my heart, let God not hear. Therefore God heard me; he attended to the voice of my prayer.” He not only did not commit iniquity in deed, but did not even regard it in his heart. Or at least he did not regard iniquity in his heart, seeing in his heart no vice of an unjust will; and therefore he was worthy to be heard. For his soul was set in life, his feet were not moved, he was led into refreshment, he will enter the house of God, and he has paid to God the vows his lips had uttered, upheld by the confession of honor and glory, saying: “Blessed be God, who has not removed my prayer and his mercy from me,” confessing at the end of the psalm the praise of God begun at its opening. To him be glory for ever and ever. Amen.
Tractates 66
66.1CSEL 22:269
Psalmus breuis est et euangelica praedicatione absolutus. nam et in finem est et psalmus cantici est, per quod confessio per scientiam gerendorum et per doctrinam proficientia gesta cantantur. et principium eius, unde oportuit, sumptum est. est autem omnis in eo sermo uel prophetarum uel apostolorum, quorum alii uenturum in corpore unigenitum deum, alii uenisse docuerunt, sancto spiritu inluminati et honore gloriae caelestis expleti. oratio ergo eorum in psalmi exordio esse noscenda est.
The psalm is short and complete in its gospel preaching. For it is both “to the end” and “a psalm of a song,” by which confession through the knowledge of what is to be done, and deeds that make progress through teaching, are sung. And its beginning has been taken from where it ought to be. All its speech is that of either the prophets or the apostles, of whom the former taught that the only-begotten God would come in the body and the latter that he had come, enlightened by the Holy Spirit and filled with the honor of heavenly glory. Their prayer, then, is to be recognized in the opening of the psalm.
66.2CSEL 22:269–271
Deus misereatur nobis et benedicat nos: inluminet uultum suum super nos 'et misereatur nobis. secundum doctrinae ordinem primum misericordia dei poscitur. ex copia enim bonitatis suae misericordiam in peccatorum remissione largitur; et peccatorum remissio non probitatis est meritum, sed spontanea indulgentiae uoluntas ex bonitatis diuitiis ad miserandi munus exuberans. ergo, qui misericors est, ut benedicat, oratur. et benedictionis quidem fructum iam in exordio formati hominis cognouimus, cum talis ad Adam tum adhuc peccati nescium sermo est: crescite et multiplicamini et replete terram et dominamini eius. ista quidem quamuis corporaliter tantum dicta plerique arbitrentur, tamen spiritali doctrina eruditis plus de se uirtutis praebuerunt. haec enim benedictio non creationes tantum corporalium successionum Adae largita est. quamuis enim fecundae eius soboles futurae essent, tamen terram inplere non poterant; quae pro copia hominum licet habitetur, non tamen adinpletur. uerum terram corporis nostri inpleri doctrinis spiritalibus uoluit et multiplicari et crescere scientia dei. per Adam enim atque in ipso Adam, qui primus opus dei fuerat, oportuerat cognitionem dei inchoari: sed eo peccatis coinquinato benedictionis istius fructum prophetae sibi atque apostoli deprecantur. quem beatus apostolus consecutus ita de se gloriatur: benedictus deus, qui benedixit nos in omni benedictione spiritali in caelestibus in Christo. hi ergo crescunt, multiplicantur, replentur, qui in Christo caelestes sunt; et benedicti sunt, qui spiritali benedictione in caelestibus benedicuntur. et uideamus, an benedictionis istius fructum praesens psalmi oratio deprecetur.
“May God have mercy on us and bless us; may he make his face shine upon us and have mercy on us.” In the order of teaching, God’s mercy is asked for first. For out of the abundance of his goodness he bestows mercy in the forgiveness of sins; and the forgiveness of sins is not the reward of uprightness but the spontaneous will of indulgence, overflowing from the riches of goodness into the gift of mercy. So he who is merciful is asked to bless. We already know the fruit of blessing from the beginning, when man was formed, when these words were spoken to Adam while he still knew no sin: “Increase and multiply, and fill the earth, and rule over it.” Although many think these words were spoken only of bodily things, to those trained in spiritual teaching they have offered more power. For this blessing did not grant Adam only the creation of bodily descendants. Although his offspring would be fruitful, they could not fill the earth; for though it is inhabited by a multitude of men, it is not filled. Rather, he willed that the earth of our body should be filled with spiritual teachings and multiplied and increased in the knowledge of God. For through Adam, and in Adam himself, who had been God’s first work, the knowledge of God ought to have begun; but since he was defiled by sins, the prophets and apostles pray for the fruit of this blessing for themselves. The blessed apostle obtained it and glories thus about himself: “Blessed be God, who has blessed us with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places in Christ.” Those, then, increase, multiply, and are filled who are heavenly in Christ; and those are blessed who are blessed with spiritual blessing in the heavenly places. Let us see whether the present prayer of the psalm asks for the fruit of this blessing.
66.3CSEL 22:271
Post misericordiam enim et benedictionem id sequitur: inluminet uultum suum super nos et misereatur nobis. benedictione dei opus est, ut nos uultus eius inluminet, ut tenebrosa corda nostra cognitionis suae lumen inradiet, ut maiestatis suae spiritus lucem obscuratis intellegentiae nostrae sensibus tribuat et gloriari deinceps liceat, dicentes: designatum est super nos lumen uultus tui domine. hanc autem inluminationem uultus sui super nos misericordia ipsius, quae in peccati remissione in nobis est coepta, largitur. in quem autem profectum inluminationem uultus dei super se precentur, sermo. consequens docet.
For after mercy and blessing there follows: “May he make his face shine upon us and have mercy on us.” It is the work of God’s blessing that his face should shine upon us, that the light of his knowledge should beam into our darkened hearts, that the Spirit of his majesty should give light to the darkened senses of our understanding, and that we may then glory, saying: “The light of your countenance is marked upon us, O Lord.” This shining of his face upon us his mercy bestows, which began in us with the forgiveness of sin. For what progress they pray for the shining of God’s face upon them, the following words teach.
66.4CSEL 22:271–273
Ut cognoscamus in terra uiam tuam et in omnibus gentibus salutare tuum. interiectio diapsalmi, etsi conuersionem personae adtulit, sensum tamen non demutauit. nunc enim ad eum sermo est, qui nunc usque fuerat in uotis. quod autem in latinis libris ita scribitur: ut cognoscamus in terra uiam tuam, in graecis ita est: του̃ γνῶναι ἐν τη̄ γη̄ τὴν ὁδόν σου. inter γνω̃ναι et cognoscamus id differt, quod sine personae definitione est γνῶναι, cognoscamus autem ipsos eos, qui haec locuntur, ostendit. ergo secundum ueram illam grsecitatis translationem inluminari se dei uultu ob id deprecantur, ut cognita fiat in terra dei uia, quae est doctrina uitae religiosae. per eam enim ad deum pergitur. religiosae autem uiae doctrina Christus est, quam se esse in euangeliis ostendit dicens: ego sum ueritas, uia, uita et rursum: nemo ad patrem uadit, nisi per me. et hunc esse uiam, ipse ille conexus sibi psalmi sermo testatur. quae in terra, id est uel ex terra ortis uel terram inhabitantibus cognoscibilis et nota praestanda est. ut cognoscamus in terra uiam tuam, in omnibus gentibus salutare tuum. Iesum salutarem dici ipse ille proprietatis sermo loquitur. nam quod nobiscum salutare est, id apud Hebraum Iesus est. confirmat autem istud angelus ad Ioseph de Maria loquens: pariet autem filium, et uocabis nomen eius Iesum: quia ipse saluum faciet populum suum a peccatis. Iesum itaque ostendit angelus idcirco. quia salutaris esset populo, nuncupandum. tantae ergo praedicationi se inpares esse, nisi inluminentur, ostendunt, nisi quodam uultus domini splendore lucescant. sunt enim et ipsi secundum euangelium lumen mundi — dominus autem ipse lux uera est — a luce inluminati, ut lumen essent apostoli et prophetae. ceterum superfluum est ideo inluminari se uelle, ut cognoscant ea, de quibus quasi cognitis praedicabant.
“That we may know your way on earth, your salvation among all nations.” The insertion of the diapsalma, though it brought a change of person, did not change the sense; for now the speech is addressed to him who until now had been the object of prayer. What is written in the Latin books as “that we may know your way on earth” is in the Greek: tou gnōnai en tē gē tēn hodon sou. Between gnōnai and “that we may know” there is this difference: gnōnai has no definite person, whereas “that we may know” points to the very people who say these words. So, according to the true rendering of the Greek, they pray to be enlightened by God’s face so that God’s way may become known on earth, which is the teaching of the religious life; for by it one goes to God. And the teaching of the religious way is Christ, who shows in the Gospels that he is it, saying: “I am the truth, the way, the life,” and again: “No one goes to the Father except through me.” And the speech of the psalm, joined to itself, testifies that he is the way: it must be made knowable and known on earth, that is, either to those born of the earth or to those who inhabit it. “That we may know your way on earth, your salvation among all nations.” The very wording, in its proper sense, says that Jesus is called “salvation”; for what we call salutare is in Hebrew “Jesus.” The angel confirms this, speaking to Joseph about Mary: “She will bear a son, and you will call his name Jesus, for he will save his people from their sins.” So the angel shows that he was to be called Jesus because he would be salvation to the people. They show, then, that they are unequal to so great a proclamation unless they are enlightened, unless they shine with a certain splendor of the Lord’s face. For they too, according to the Gospel, are the light of the world (but the Lord himself is the true light), enlightened by the light so that the apostles and prophets might be lights. Otherwise it would be pointless for them to wish to be enlightened in order to know the things they were preaching as already known.
66.5CSEL 22:273
Hanc autem omnem propheticam atque apostolicam doctrinam necesse est confessio populorum et remissorum peccatorum laetitia consequantur: neque solum peccatorum remissorum, sed quod eum, qui peccata remiserit, aequitatis futurum iudicem sciant, quod per eum in uiam uitae omnes gentes terram inhabitantes dirigantur relicto idolorum errore ad cognitionem dei. eruditae. idcirco haec secuntur: confiteantur tibi populi, deus, confiteantur tibi populi omnes. laetentur et exultent gentes, quoniam iudicabis populos in aequitate et gentes in terram diriges. cum confitentur populi, designari uidentur ex tribubus duodecim uel credentes uel credituri. cum confitentur populi omnes, exceptio nulla fit gentium. cum laetantur et exultant gentes, quoniam iudicabit populos in aequitate et gentes in terram diriget, causa laetitiae ex spe iudicii aeterni et directarum in uiam uitae gentium praedicatur.
This whole prophetic and apostolic teaching must be followed by the confession of the peoples and by joy at the forgiveness of sins: and not only of sins forgiven, but because they know that he who forgave sins will be the judge of equity, and that through him all the nations inhabiting the earth are directed into the way of life, leaving the error of idols and instructed in the knowledge of God. Therefore these words follow: “Let the peoples confess to you, O God; let all the peoples confess to you. Let the nations be glad and exult, for you will judge the peoples in equity and direct the nations on earth.” When “the peoples” confess, those of the twelve tribes who believe or will believe seem to be meant. When “all the peoples” confess, no nation is excepted. When the nations are glad and exult because he will judge the peoples in equity and direct the nations on earth, the cause of joy is proclaimed to be the hope of eternal judgment and of the nations directed into the way of life.
66.6CSEL 22:273–274
Interiectio diapsalmi uidetur hic nihil innouasse, cum praesertim sub isdem uerbis sensus iteratus sit: confiteantur tibi populi, deus, confiteantur tibi populi omnes. sed cum adicitur: terra dedit fructum suum, intellegitur non ex nihilo eorumdem uerborum facta esse repetitio, si tamen idipsum sub isdem uerbis significatum intellegere debeamus. inuenimus enim confessionem duplici ratione esse tractandam: esse unam confessorum peccatorum, ubi in deserto Iordanis confitebantur peccata sua; esse aliam laudationis dei, ubi dominus loquitur ad patrem: confitebor tibi, domine pater, domine caelorum et terrae, quoniam abscondisti haec a sapientibus et reuelasti ea paruulis. prima ergo illa et superior confessio peccatorum esse credenda est, maxime quae prsedicationi propheticae atque apostolicae conectitur; sequens haec laudationis dei intellegenda est populorum, deinde omnium, id est gentium uniuersarum, et ob id, quia terra fructum suum dederit.
The insertion of the diapsalma seems to have introduced nothing new here, especially since the sense is repeated in the same words: “Let the peoples confess to you, O God; let all the peoples confess to you.” But when there is added, “The earth has given its fruit,” it is understood that the repetition of the same words was not made for nothing, if indeed we ought to understand the same thing signified by the same words. For we find that confession is to be treated in two ways: one is the confession of sins, as when in the desert of the Jordan they confessed their sins; the other is the confession of praise to God, as when the Lord says to the Father: “I confess to you, Lord Father, Lord of heaven and earth, that you have hidden these things from the wise and revealed them to little ones.” The first and earlier confession, then, is to be taken as the confession of sins, especially since it is joined to the prophetic and apostolic preaching; this following one is to be understood as the confession of praise to God, first of the peoples and then of all, that is, of all the nations, and that because the earth has given its fruit.
66.7CSEL 22:274–275
Sed quaerendum est, quem fructum terra dederit, ob quem populi omnes deum laudent. causa quidem deo debitae laudationis aeterna est, quod corporales hos et nobis necessarios fructus terra suppeditet: sed terrae non sunt. aut enim nostri sunt, quibus praebentur, aut dei sunt, per quem ministrantur. requiramus ergo, quos fructus terra habuerit et amiserit. per id autem, quod amisit, ostendemus habuisse. Adae terram meminimus post peccatum datarum sibi benedictionum honore fuisse spoliatam. ipsi enim dictum est: quoniam terra e s. et in terram ibis. ergo quia terra est, hac post peccatum maledictione damnatur: maledicta terra in operibus tuis, in doloribus edes eam omnibus diebus uitae. tuae, spinas et tribulos generabit tibi. terrae elementum extra crimen fuit: caret ergo maledictione, quod carebat et crimine. uerum hic Adae terra, quae per inlecebram cibi erat criminosa, maledicitur. haec ergo ab eo omnibus praesentis uitae maeroribus consumitur et aegritudinum doloribus editur omnibus, spinis et tribulis uitiorum et cupiditatum aculeis conpuncta. omnis ergo terreno Adae similis hos maledictos fructus terrae suae reddit. ceterum qui iam caelesti Adae configorator, habet innocentem terrae suae fructum, primum dei cognitione locupletem, dehinc castitatis, iustitiae, misericordiae operibus gloriosum, uetere homine cum uitiis et concupiscentiis eius exuto. ob id ergo deo est reddenda confessio, quod terra fructum suum dederit. suum: quia eum Adam cum habuisset. amiserat. dedit ergo, quod suum est, id est fructum, qui ei in cognitione dei est, exhibuit in ipso illo primum domino nostro, qui terrenum corpus adsumpsit nihil peccans.
But we must ask what fruit the earth has given, for which all the peoples praise God. There is indeed an everlasting cause of praise owed to God, that the earth supplies these bodily fruits necessary to us; but they are not the earth’s. They are either ours, to whom they are given, or God’s, through whom they are supplied. Let us ask, then, what fruits the earth had and lost; and by what it lost we shall show that it had them. We remember that the earth of Adam, after sin, was stripped of the honor of the blessings given to it. For it was said to him: “For you are earth, and to earth you shall go.” Because he is earth, then, after sin he is condemned with this curse: “Cursed is the earth in your works; in sorrow you shall eat of it all the days of your life; it will bring forth thorns and thistles for you.” The element of earth was free of the crime; so it is free of the curse, as it was free of the crime. Rather, here the earth of Adam, which had become guilty through the allurement of food, is cursed. This earth, then, is consumed by him with all the sorrows of the present life and eaten with all the pains of sicknesses, pricked with the thorns and thistles of vices and the stings of desires. Everyone like the earthly Adam, then, yields these cursed fruits of his earth. But he who is already conformed to the heavenly Adam has the innocent fruit of his earth, rich first in the knowledge of God, then glorious with works of chastity, righteousness, and mercy, the old man with his vices and lusts having been put off. For this reason, then, confession is to be made to God, that the earth has given its fruit. “Its own”: because Adam, having had it, had lost it. It gave, then, what was its own, that is, the fruit that it has in the knowledge of God; it displayed it first in our Lord himself, who took an earthly body without sinning at all.
66.8CSEL 22:275
Ob quae demonstranda et docenda rursum benedictionis dei munus oratur, cum dicitur: benedicat nos deus. ac ne de incerto et incognito deo sperari benedictio existimaretur, adiectum est: deus noster: patriarcharum scilicet et prophetarum et apostolis ipsis tamquam successionis hereditate iam proprius; in quibus fructum suum dedit terra, continentiae et fidei et iustitiae et misericordiae, quin etiam inter ipsos saeuissimarum persecutionum cruciatus atque mortes ipso iam diuini nominis deuota martyrio.
To show and teach these things the gift of God’s blessing is again prayed for, when it is said: “May God bless us.” And lest the blessing should be thought to be hoped for from an uncertain and unknown god, there was added: “our God”: the God, that is, of the patriarchs and prophets, and already the apostles’ own by a kind of inheritance in succession; in whom the earth gave its fruit of self-control, faith, righteousness, and mercy, and even, amid the very tortures and deaths of the most savage persecutions, devoted now to the very martyrdom of the divine name.
66.9CSEL 22:275–276
Repetitur deinde benedictionis oratio. cum dicitur: benedicat nos deus. non ex nihilo iterantur haec uota, sed ut per benedictionem dei augescente doctrina deum omnes terrae fines timeant. ait enim: et metuant eum omnes fines terrae. metuant ergo omnes fines terrae deum, sed deum nostrum, sed deum benedicentem. non est minimum officium fidei metus. nam inter praecipua spiritalium gratiarum dona numeratur, cum dicitur per Esaiam: et repleuit eum spiritus timoris dei. et per Salomonem: initium sapientiae timor domini est beatus, cui prouenerit timere non ex natura humanae trepidatione, sed ex cognitione rationis. qui enim ex infirmitate in rebus trepidis metuit, hic in secundis rebus rursum ex naturae uitio insolescit. at qui ex scientia timet, semper timet neque minus secunda quam aduersa formidat. sumit igitur originem sapientia ex timore res utiles ac probabiles exequendo, quae propriae peculiaresque sapientiae sunt. hunc ergo dei timorem omnibus terrae finibus propheta optat, ut nulla gens terram incolens extra metum eius sit, apostolo uoti ipsius summam explicante, cum dicit: et omnis lingua confiteatur, quia dominus Iesus in gloria est dei patris, qui est benedictus in saecula saeculorum. amen.
Then the prayer for blessing is repeated, when it is said: “May God bless us.” These prayers are not repeated for nothing, but so that, as the teaching grows through God’s blessing, all the ends of the earth may fear God. For he says: “and let all the ends of the earth fear him.” Let all the ends of the earth fear God, then, but our God, the God who blesses. Fear is not the least duty of faith. For it is counted among the chief gifts of spiritual graces, when it is said through Isaiah: “And the spirit of the fear of God filled him,” and through Solomon: “The beginning of wisdom is the fear of the Lord.” Blessed is he to whom it has come to fear, not out of the trembling of human nature, but out of rational knowledge. For one who fears out of weakness in alarming circumstances grows insolent again in prosperity from a fault of nature. But one who fears out of knowledge always fears, and dreads prosperity no less than adversity. Wisdom, then, takes its origin from fear by carrying out useful and approved things, which are proper and peculiar to wisdom. This fear of God, then, the prophet wishes for all the ends of the earth, so that no nation inhabiting the earth may be outside his fear; the apostle unfolds the sum of this very prayer when he says: “and every tongue confess that the Lord Jesus is in the glory of God the Father,” who is blessed for ever and ever. Amen.
Tractates 67
67.1CSEL 22:276–277
Psalmus non a Dauid, sed illi Dauid in finem praescribitur. deinde non canticum psalmi, sed psalmus est cantici, ut in eo cognitionis et scientiae propheticae enuntiatio doceretur. est autem ipse totus sacramentis legis euangeliorumque contextus magnaque et ex praeteritis et ex futuris allegoricorum dictorum interpretatione confertus: qui et legis latae in se doctrinam contineat et adsumptae a domino carnis adferat notionem et impietatem populi anterioris exprobret et futurae cognitionis nostrae fidem nuntiet et domini super caelos conplectator ascensum et futuri regni eius gloriam conprehendat. initium autem ex eo sumpsit prophetia, in quo salutis nostrae consistit effectus. coepit enim ita:
The psalm is headed not “by David” but “to David himself, to the end.” Next, it is not “a song of a psalm” but “a psalm of a song,” so that in it the utterance of prophetic understanding and knowledge might be taught. It is woven throughout with the mysteries of the law and the Gospels, and packed with the interpretation of allegorical sayings drawn from past and future alike. It contains the teaching of the law that was given; it brings the notion of the flesh taken by the Lord; it reproaches the impiety of the former people; it announces the faith of our future knowledge; it embraces the Lord’s ascension above the heavens; and it includes the glory of his future kingdom. The prophecy took its beginning from that in which the effect of our salvation consists. For it began thus:
67.2CSEL 22:277–278
Exurgat deus, et dispargantur inimici eius et fugiant odientes eum a facie eius. sermo uotorum est non ex incerto poscentis, sed ex cognitione scientiaque sperantis; resurrectionis enim nunc in deo tempus optatur, cum de peccato peccatum in carne condemnans potestates huius mundi ostentui fecit cum fiducia triumphatis his in semetipso. uenit enim mundum uincere et principem mundi cum peccati lege configere et decretum mortis peccati remissione delere. hanc igitur propheta fugam horum inimicorum eius expectat. neque enim resurgentis ex mortuis occursum eius potuit haec odientium eum turba daemonum perferre, cum ad primam apostolicae fidei post subiectas his spiritales nequitias potestatem cecidisse de caelo satanan modo sit fulguris praedicatum et princeps mundi in passione sit iudicatus. sed fugientes a facie dei trepidationem suam quidem, dum fugiunt, ostendunt, euadere tamen faciem dei, quamquam fugiant, non possunt. nam et trepidationem earundem nequitiarum spiritalium psalmo anteriore declarat dicens: misit sagittas suas et dissipauit eos; et fulgura multiplicauit et conturbauit eos. conturbantur itaque et fugiunt dissipati. uerum dei uultus non effugiunt potestatem secundum illud: ascendit fumus in ira eius, et ignis a facie eius exardescit, carbones succensi sunt ab eo. horum itaque inimicorum fugam haee et interitus et iudicii poena consequitur.
“Let God arise, and let his enemies be scattered, and let those who hate him flee from his face.” This is the speech of prayer, not of one asking in uncertainty but of one hoping from knowledge and understanding. For the time of resurrection is now desired in God, when, condemning sin in the flesh by sin, he made a show of the powers of this world, confidently triumphing over them in himself. For he came to conquer the world, to grapple with the prince of the world and with the law of sin, and to blot out the decree of death by the forgiveness of sin. This flight of his enemies, then, the prophet awaits. For this crowd of demons who hate him could not bear to meet him as he rose from the dead, since, when the spiritual wickednesses had been subjected to the first power of apostolic faith, it was proclaimed that Satan had fallen from heaven like lightning, and the prince of the world was judged in the passion. But as they flee from the face of God they show their terror in fleeing, yet they cannot escape the face of God, though they flee. For he declares the terror of these same spiritual wickednesses in an earlier psalm, saying: “He sent his arrows and scattered them; he multiplied lightnings and threw them into confusion.” So they are thrown into confusion and flee, scattered. But they do not escape the power of God’s face, according to this: “Smoke went up in his anger, and fire blazed from his face; coals were kindled by him.” The flight of these enemies, then, is followed by destruction and the punishment of judgment.
67.3CSEL 22:278
Et sane idem nunc, ut in anteriore psalmo, prophetiae ordo distinguitur. sequitur enim: sicut deficit fumus, deficiant; sicut liquescit cera a facie ignis. sic pereant peccatores a facie dei. fumus cum emerserit, licet globosus et crassus, tamen paulatim ita deficit aboleturque, ne extet, sicut in conspectu ignis cera sic liquescit, ut non sit; fumo quidem in inane per leuitatem sui tenuitatemque dilapso. cera autem ui et calore ignis absumpta, quia infirmis ipsa per sese naturae potioris diripiatur ardore; quem in modum omnis iniquorum potestas a facie dei, id est dei iudicio deliquescit.
And indeed the same order of prophecy is now marked out as in the earlier psalm. For there follows: “As smoke vanishes, let them vanish; as wax melts before the fire, so let sinners perish before the face of God.” Smoke, when it rises, though in thick billows, gradually vanishes and is destroyed so as not to exist, just as wax melts in the presence of fire so as to be no more: the smoke slipping away into emptiness by its lightness and thinness, the wax consumed by the force and heat of the fire, because, weak in itself, it is torn apart by the burning of a stronger nature. In the same way all the power of the wicked melts away before the face of God, that is, at the judgment of God.
67.4CSEL 22:278–279
Et hunc peccatorum a dei facie interitum necesse est ut iustorum laetitia consequatur. nam et continuo subiectum est: et iusti laetentur in laetitia. aequa enim iudicii caelestis et iusta moderatio est ut peccatores morte conficere, ita et iustos laetitia munerari. idipsum autem ad ostentandum iudicii examen est consecutum: exultent in conspectu dei, epulentur in laetitia. mundo enim corde, secundum euangelicae benedictionis merita, conspectu dei digni sunt. uerum laetari in laetitia significationis est altioris, causam scilicet perfectae laetitiae ostendens. plerique enim in his, quae sibi sunt nocitura, laetantur, ut gaudet lasciuus in scortis, ut fur laetatur in furtis, ut unumquemque pro uitiis suis ea, quae exercet, oblectant. uerum qui in laetitia laetantur, causam laetitiae ex ipsius laetitiae honesta utilique ueritate suscepit et idcirco in laetitia laetantur, quia in conspectu dei exultabunt; eam uerte exultationis docens esse laetitiam, quae conspectus dei iucunditate perfecta sit. exultationis autem huius atque epulantium gaudia, ex quibus est laetitia iusto, sanctus Moyses in diuina illa Deuteronomii cantione ita meminit dicens: iucundamini caeli simul cum eo, et adorent eum omnes angeli dei. iucundamini gentes cum populo eius, et confortent eos omnes filii dei. in hac itaque laetitia laetabuntur et iusti caelesti gaudio unanimes, exultationis diuinae societate laetantes.
And this destruction of sinners before the face of God must be followed by the joy of the righteous. For at once there was added: “And let the righteous rejoice in joy.” For the fair and just measure of heavenly judgment is that, as it destroys sinners with death, so it rewards the righteous with joy. And this followed to display the examination of judgment: “Let them exult in the sight of God; let them feast in joy.” For the pure in heart, according to the merits of the Gospel blessing, are worthy of the sight of God. But “to rejoice in joy” has a deeper meaning, showing the cause of perfect joy. For many rejoice in things that will harm them, as the lustful delights in harlots and the thief rejoices in thefts, as each person is pleased, according to his vices, by what he practices. But one who rejoices in joy has taken the cause of his joy from the honorable and useful truth of joy itself; and they rejoice in joy because they will exult in the sight of God; he teaches that the true joy of exultation is that which is perfected by the delight of God’s sight. The joys of this exultation and of those feasting, from which the righteous has his joy, holy Moses recalled in that divine song of Deuteronomy, saying: “Rejoice, heavens, together with him, and let all the angels of God worship him. Rejoice, nations, with his people, and let all the sons of God strengthen them.” In this joy, then, the righteous too will rejoice, of one mind in heavenly gladness, rejoicing in the fellowship of divine exultation.
67.5CSEL 22:279–280
Et ad huius nos temporis gratulationem sub fidei euangelicae confessione nunc propheta aduocat dicens: cantate deo, psallite nomini eius, iter facite ei, qui ascendit super occasum. dominus nomen est illi: et exultate in conspectu eius. adhortatio omnis licet multum ad quendam pulsum et uoluntatis nostrae proficiat et mentis, cum ad aliquid optandum agendumque conciliante ea uel inliciente deducimur, tamen, si maxime adhortationis ipsius causa proposita sit, iam ratione animus ac uia tamquam certissimo duce nititur. ut nunc propheta nos ad cantandum deo psallendumque nomini eius hortatus, ne quid forte ambiguitatis relinqueret, et cui deo et cuius nomini psallendum esset, ostendit, ut iam non adhortatio adhibita, sed cognitio percepta in dei nos exultatione et cantico conlocaret.
And to the thanksgiving of this time, under the confession of the gospel faith, the prophet now calls us, saying: “Sing to God, sing psalms to his name; make a way for him who rises above the setting. The Lord is his name; and exult in his sight.” Although every exhortation does much to stir our will and mind, when we are led to desire or do something by its persuasion or allurement, yet if the very cause of the exhortation is set before us, the mind then relies on reason and method as on the surest guide. So now the prophet, having exhorted us to sing to God and to sing psalms to his name, lest he should leave any ambiguity, showed both to what God and to whose name we must sing psalms, so that no longer an exhortation applied but a knowledge received might set us in the exultation and song of God.
67.6CSEL 22:280–281
Psallendum itaque ei iterque eius parandum est, qui ascendit super occasum. occasu autem uniuersa, quae ueniunt in uitam, intelleguntur aboleri. abolitio autem omnium occidentium secundum humanam communemque opinionem existimatur in morte. ei ergo psallendum eiusque iter nobis est praeparandum, qui occasum mortis ascenderit, id est, qui occasum omnem occasu ipso non detentus excesserit. huic autem nomen est dominus, qui se ex forma dei exinaniens et formam serui suscipiens oboedientem se usque ad mortem crucis egit. propter quod eum exaltauit deus nomenque ei super omne nomen donauit, ut in eius nomine genu caelestia et terrestria flecterent et inferna, linguaque omnis confiteretur dominum Iesum in gloria dei patris. ascendit ergo super occasum, cui nomen est dominus, idque, quo occidunt uniuersa, transgrediens legem mortis ex mortuis aeternus egressus est. huic itaque iter parandum est secundum illud: parate uias domini, rectas facite semitas eius. omnis uallis inplebitur et omnis collis humiliabitur, ut parato itinere in nobis, id est uitiorum infidelitatisque nostrae uel conpressis tumoribus uel eleuata humilitate terrenae labis, initurus correctis aequatisque uitae semitis in corda nostra descendat. in huius itaque conspectu exultabimus, cui iter exaequatis et insolentiae tumoribus et libidinum uoraginibus sit parandum, et in quo nos resurgentes ex mortuis contuebimur. super occasum enim nostrae mortis ascendens uitam nobis ex mortuis in se resurgente quaesiuit. haec illa apostolorum est laetitia, cum eum post resurrectionem contemplantes contrectantesque uiderunt.
We must sing psalms, then, and prepare the way of him who rises above the setting. By “setting” is understood that all things that come into life are destroyed; and the destruction of all things that set is, by common human opinion, reckoned to be in death. We must sing psalms to him, then, and prepare his way, who rose above the setting of death, that is, who passed beyond all setting without being held by the setting itself. His name is “Lord,” who, emptying himself from the form of God and taking the form of a servant, made himself obedient even to the death of the cross. Therefore God exalted him and gave him a name above every name, that at his name things in heaven and on earth and under the earth should bend the knee and every tongue confess the Lord Jesus in the glory of God the Father. He, then, whose name is Lord rose above the setting, and, passing beyond that by which all things set, he went out from the dead eternal, beyond the law of death. For him, then, a way must be prepared according to this: “Prepare the ways of the Lord, make his paths straight. Every valley will be filled and every hill brought low,” so that, when the way has been prepared in us, that is, when the swellings of our vices and unbelief have been pressed down or the lowness of our earthly stain raised up, he may come down into our hearts, entering by the paths of life made straight and level. In his sight, then, we shall exult, for whom a way is to be prepared by leveling both the swellings of insolence and the chasms of lusts, and in whom we shall see ourselves rising from the dead. For rising above the setting of our death, he gained life for us from the dead in his own rising. This is the joy of the apostles, when they saw him after the resurrection, beholding and touching him.
67.7CSEL 22:281–282
Sed hanc sanctorum laetitiam trepidatio eorum, quos cum mundo uicit, insequitur; id enim ait: turbabuntur a facie eius, patris orphanorum et iudicis uiduarum.. causam turbationis hanc docuit, quod pater orphanorum sit iudexque uiduarum — a facie enim patris orphanorum uiduarumque iudicis fugient — non relinquens eos orphanos, qui agnoscentes patrem in caelis diabolo patri renuntiauerint, easque uiduas, quae legi mortuae sponsum se secutae sunt, iudicans. uiduam enim, quae a lege sit libera, beatus Paulus transire ad nuptias alterius sine adulterii crimine docuit idque exemplum omne ad ecclesiam, quae legi se mortuam Christo postea sociaret, aptauit. est autem etiam secundum huius saeculi sortem sensus aptissimus. ut deus, qui aduocatum nobis a patre alium dedit, ne orphani essemus in saeculo, orbatorum pater sit iudexque uiduarum; quia et desolatae a parentibus misereatur infantiae uiduarumque, quae in se adquieuerint, iudex sit. iudex autem ideo. quia sub nomine uiduarum pleraeque non uiduae sunt, quae uel deliciatae in Christo nubere nolunt, uel fallunt humana iudicia; et quia dignitas nominis in conseruato proposito sit uoluntatis, scrutans corda et renes deus idcirco sit iudex, quia solus earum mentem sensumque diiudicet. et quidem haec, ut dixi, secundum desolationem condicionis humanae de orphanis uiduisque sint dicta.
But this joy of the saints is followed by the terror of those whom he conquered together with the world; for he says: “They will be troubled before his face, the father of orphans and judge of widows.” He taught that the cause of their trouble is that he is the father of orphans and the judge of widows (for they will flee from the face of the father of orphans and judge of widows): not leaving as orphans those who, acknowledging the Father in heaven, have renounced the devil as father, and judging those widows who, dead to the law, have followed the Bridegroom. For blessed Paul taught that a widow who is free from the law passes to marriage with another without the charge of adultery, and he applied this whole example to the church, which, having died to the law, afterward joined herself to Christ. There is also a very fitting sense according to the lot of this world: that God, who gave us another Advocate from the Father so that we should not be orphans in the world, is the father of the bereaved and the judge of widows; for he both pities childhood bereft of parents and is the judge of widows who have rested in him. Judge, because under the name of widows many are not widows, who either, having grown wanton against Christ, wish to marry, or deceive human judgments; and because the dignity of the name lies in keeping the resolve of the will, God, who searches hearts and reins, is judge for this reason, that he alone discerns their mind and intent. And these things, as I said, may be said of orphans and widows according to the desolation of the human condition.
67.8CSEL 22:282–283
Ceterum ut ad ecclesiae totius demonstrationem haec ita significata esse possint intellegi, continuo subiecit: deus in loco sancto suo: deus inhabitare facit unimores in domo, educens uinctos in fortitudine, similiter eos, qui exacerbant, qui inhabitant in sepulcris. hic ergo locus deo sanctus est, ubi sit uidua ex lege, ubi orphanus ex saeculo, ubi unius moris ac uoluntatis pacificus unanimisque conuentus — erat enim secundum Actus apostolorum credentium anima et cor unum —. ubi qui uincti sunt educentur in fortitudine. ligato enim prius intra domum suam forte eos, qui peccatis suis uinciebantur, absoluit, ut Abrahae filiam octo et decem annis ligatam in libertatem uerbo uirtutis eduxit. eduxit autem etiam eos, qui antea exacerbabant, id. est, qui transgressione legis iram in se dei iudicis incitabant uel aduersum nomen eius gentili eloquio disserebant, ad doctrinam diuinae cognitionis instituit, ut ex persecutore Paulum gentium apostolum doctoremque perfecit. hos itaque exacerbantes, inhabitantes antea in sepulcris, id est intra corporum suorum emortua domicilia conaepultos in caelestem uitam spiritalemque deduxit. sunt enim multi in uiuentibus mortuÎ. nam et in euangeliis mortui non putati non differre docentur a mortuis domino dicente: sine mortuos sepelire mortuos suos, et apostolus scit quasdam mortuas uiuere, id est, dum uiuunt, esse iam mortuas. sed hos omnes de sepulcris dominus, qui in filios dei regenerantur, eduxit.
But so that these things may be understood as signified in this way to describe the whole church, he added at once: “God in his holy place; God makes those of one manner dwell in a house, leading out the prisoners in strength, likewise those who embitter, who dwell in tombs.” This, then, is the place holy to God, where there is the widow from the law, the orphan from the world, the peaceful and unanimous gathering of one manner and will (for according to the Acts of the Apostles the believers had one soul and heart), where those who are bound are led out in strength. For having first bound the strong man inside his own house, he set free those who were bound by their sins, as he led out into freedom, by a word of power, the daughter of Abraham bound for eighteen years. He also led out those who previously embittered, that is, who by transgressing the law stirred up against themselves the anger of God the judge, or who argued against his name with pagan eloquence; he instructed them in the teaching of divine knowledge, as he made Paul, from a persecutor, the apostle and teacher of the Gentiles. These who embittered, then, who formerly dwelt in tombs, that is, buried within the dead dwellings of their bodies, he led into heavenly and spiritual life. For there are many dead among the living. In the Gospels too those not thought dead are taught to differ in nothing from the dead, the Lord saying: “Let the dead bury their own dead”; and the apostle knows that certain women are dead while living, that is, that while they live they are already dead. But all these the Lord led out of the tombs, as they are reborn as sons of God.
67.9CSEL 22:283–285
Verum haec qui in nobis deus super occasum ascendens per uirtutem resurrectionis operatus est, idem omnia ad huius spei nostrae praeparationem adumbrata gessit in lege, ut non alius prophetarum, alius euangeliorum deus possit intellegi. atque ideo erga nos quoque paribus haec momentis, quibus ex Aegypto populum eduxit, inpleuit. nam et patres nostri sub nube fuerunt et in Moyse in mari baptizati sunt et in similitudinem caelestis panis manna e caelis decidente saturati sunt et Christo aquam petra praebente potati sunt; quae quidem in illis salutariter gesta symbola quoque nostrae in se salutis habuerunt, ut sequens prophetiae sermo declarat dicens: deus, dum egredieris coram populo tuo, dum transgredieris in deserto, terra mota est. etenim caeli destillauerunt a facie dei, mons Sina facie dei Israhel. praeisse deum iter populi sui, dum desertum transgreditur, in columna nubis ignisque cognouimus et usque ad populi errorem de caelis stillasse manna. sed cum superiora omnia, quae ecclesiae propria sunt atque apta, memorasset, scilicet cum super occasum ascendit dominus, cum orphanorum pater est iudexque uiduarum, cum in loco sancto suo, id est in domo, congregat unimores et uinctos in fortitudine et exacerbantes extrahit e sepulchris, haec tamen coram populo egrediens et in desertum transiens consummare memoratus est, ut nunc ex praeterito motam esse terram, destillasse caelos et hoc a facie dei Israhel in Sina. refertur effectum. hoc ideo, ut, cum illa, quae legis sunt, gessit, in his quoque ea, quae euangeliorum sunt, praeformasse sciretur. egressus enim coram populo suo in desertumque transgressus est; in illum uidelicet desertum Iordanis, in quo lilia floruerunt, in quo fons aquae uitalis desolata et arida inrigauit. funiculum namque ante erat hereditatis Iacob desertaeque gentes elementorum subditae fuerunt potestati. at nunc inspectante eo, qui fuit dei populus, deus ad ea, quae ante erant desolata, transiuit; et iam inrigata ab eo finium deserta pinguescent. et hic idem est, qui manna de caelis dedit populo. si enim lex disposita per angelos est, panemque angelorum manducauit homo, caelique stillasse in Sina scribuntur, profecto ministerium hoc a caelis, id est ab angelis expletum esse non dubium est. estque idem largitor eius, qui de cselis est, panis, qui in Sina mannae fuerat indultor.
But the same God who, rising above the setting, worked these things in us by the power of the resurrection, did all things in the law as foreshadowings in preparation for this hope of ours, so that one God of the prophets and another of the Gospels could not be imagined. And therefore he fulfilled these things toward us too in the same stages by which he led the people out of Egypt. For our fathers were under the cloud and were baptized into Moses in the sea, and were filled with manna falling from heaven in the likeness of the heavenly bread, and were given drink by Christ when the rock supplied water; and these things, done for their salvation, also held in themselves symbols of our salvation, as the following words of the prophecy declare, saying: “O God, when you went out before your people, when you passed through the desert, the earth was moved; for the heavens dripped before the face of God, Mount Sinai before the face of the God of Israel.” We know that God went before his people on their way, as they passed through the desert, in the pillar of cloud and fire, and that manna dripped from heaven until the people’s wandering ended. But after he had recalled all the earlier things that are proper and fitting to the church, namely when the Lord rose above the setting, when he is the father of orphans and judge of widows, when in his holy place, that is, in a house, he gathers those of one manner, and draws out of the tombs those bound in strength and those who embitter, he nevertheless said that he accomplished these things going out before the people and passing into the desert, so that it is now told as past that the earth was moved, the heavens dripped, and this was done before the face of the God of Israel at Sinai. He does this so that it might be known that, when he did the things of the law, he also prefigured in them the things of the Gospels. For he went out before his people and passed into the desert: into that desert of the Jordan, namely, in which lilies blossomed, in which the fountain of living water watered what was desolate and dry. For before, Jacob was the measuring line of his inheritance, and the desert nations were subject to the power of the elements. But now, while the one who was God’s people looks on, God has passed over to what was formerly desolate; and now the deserts of the borders, watered by him, will grow fat. And this is the same one who gave manna from heaven to the people. For if the law was ordained through angels, and man ate the bread of angels, and the heavens are written to have dripped at Sinai, there is no doubt that this ministry was carried out from heaven, that is, by angels. And the giver of the bread that is from heaven is the same who granted the manna at Sinai.
67.10CSEL 22:285–286
Sed transiens ad desertum deus, id est ad gentilium arida et desolata quondam corda transcendens felicem illam bonae uoluntatis pluuiam segregauit. segregauit enim ipse ex utero matris Paulum in apostolum: quia. quos et praesciuit, hos et praedistinxit. hanc etiam eloquii praedicationisque pluuiam et in psalmo Salomon terrae ad spei securitatem nuntiauit dicens: et descendit sicut pluuia in uellus et sicut stillicidia stillantia supra terram. et aliquibus nubibus ne super uineam pluerent meminimus esse praeceptum. sanctus quoque Moyses, qui sub uelamento uerborum communium ingentia caelestis spei sacramenta condebat, uerba sua excipi ut pluuiam imbremque cantauit, pluuiam inrigantem desertam et aridam et praeparatam deo hereditatem. atque ideo sequitur: pluuiam uoluntariam segregabis, deus, hereditati tuae: et infirmata est, tu uero perfecisti eam. animalia tua habitabunt in ea, parasti in dulcedine tua pauperi. prouidus enim uoluntatum deus segregauit uoluntariam pluuiam praesciendo. quae infirma est, cum iudicium in se mortis habuit Paulus, cum Petrus scandalo crucis motus est, ter denegat admonitus ne negaret, cum apostoli timent, fugiunt, diffidunt. sed quia in his bonae uoluntatis esset adfectus, perfecti ita sunt, ut et fundamenta ecclesiarum fierent et columnae. haec ergo hereditati dei pluuia segregatur.
But God, passing to the desert, that is, crossing over to the once dry and desolate hearts of the Gentiles, set apart that happy rain of good will. For he himself set Paul apart from his mother’s womb to be an apostle, because “those whom he foreknew, he also predestined.” This rain of speech and preaching Solomon also announced to the earth in a psalm, for the security of hope, saying: “And he will come down like rain upon a fleece, and like drops dripping upon the earth.” And we remember that some clouds were commanded not to rain upon the vineyard. Holy Moses too, who under the veil of common words was hiding great mysteries of heavenly hope, sang that his words should be received like rain and showers, rain watering the deserted and dry inheritance prepared for God. And therefore there follows: “You will set apart a willing rain, O God, for your inheritance; and it was weakened, but you perfected it. Your creatures will dwell in it; you prepared it in your sweetness for the poor.” For God, foreseeing wills, set apart the willing rain by foreknowing. It is weak when Paul had the sentence of death in himself, when Peter, shaken by the scandal of the cross, denied three times though warned not to deny, when the apostles fear, flee, and lose confidence. But because there was in them the disposition of good will, they were so perfected that they became the foundations and pillars of the churches. This rain, then, is set apart for God’s inheritance.
67.11CSEL 22:286–287
Quae autem hereditas sit, non obscurum est, ea scilicet, quae data est poscenti, cum dicitur: posce a me, et dabo tibi gentes hereditatem tuam. gentes itaque animantium et pecorum ritu non intellegentes — et ideo, cum cura pecorum deo nulla sit, hereditas illa in hac segregata uoluntaria pluuia est - in ea habitare monstrantur. sequitur enim: animalia tua habitabunt in ea, parasti in dulcedine tua pauperi. habitabunt ergo animalia uel in hereditate dei uel in pluuia uoluntaria; et haec in dulcedine pauperi uel hereditas uel pluuia est parata. eloquia enim dei in sanctorum faucibus dulcia sunt, et beati sunt pauperes spiritu, quia ipsorum est regnum caelorum. animalia autem cum essent, facta sunt spiritalia. haec ergo omnia in usum hereditatis, uel. uoluntariae pluuiae ministerium sunt segregata.
What the inheritance is, is not obscure: namely, that which was given to the one who asked, when it is said: “Ask of me, and I will give you the nations as your inheritance.” The nations, then, without understanding after the manner of animals and cattle (and therefore, since God has no care for cattle, that inheritance is the one set apart in this willing rain), are shown to dwell in it. For there follows: “Your creatures will dwell in it; you prepared it in your sweetness for the poor.” Creatures, then, will dwell either in God’s inheritance or in the willing rain; and this, either the inheritance or the rain, has been prepared in sweetness for the poor. For the words of God are sweet in the throats of the saints, and blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven. And though they were animal, they were made spiritual. All these things, then, have been set apart for the use of the inheritance or the service of the willing rain.
67.12CSEL 22:287–288
Atque ut secundum praeparatam dulcedinem pauperi uel ecclesiae congregatio, quae hereditas deo est, uel apostolicae praedicationis significatum esse intellegeretur eloquium, subiecit: deus dominus dabit uerbum euangelizantibus uirtutibus multis, rex uirtutium dilecti, et pulchritudini domus diuidere spolia. segregatae itaque pluuiae ad euangelium inrigandum dominus dabit uerbum, idipsum in sensum nostrum et ora diffundens, secundum illud: non enim uos estis, qui loquimini, sed spiritus patris uestri, qui loquitur in uobis. sed uirtutes multae euangelizantes sunt, quibus dabit uerbum, ut sit in Paulo uirtus, in Petro uirtus et in lohanne uirtus et in ceteris uirtus, multasque ob id euangelii praedicandi significet esse uirtutes; quibus quamuis deus et dominus et rex dabit uerbum, uirtutes tamen istae dilecti sunt, id est eius, qui regi et domino et deo sit dilectus. laboriosius autem id et obscurius, dum conlocationes uerborum non demutat, translatio latina declarat. ceterum absolutius totum hoc sermo e graeco enuntiatus eloquitur, hunc scilicet deum et dominum nostrum regem earum, quae dilecti sint, esse uirtutum: ut uirtutes ad apostolos, dilectus uero referatur ad Christum, cuius uel in his, uel hi omnes intellegantur esse uirtutes. oportuit autem propter ea, quae secuntur, licet in omnibus unus atque idem esset spiritus, numerosarum tamen uirtutum fieri mentionem, quia ad pulchritudinem domus ipse uirtutum spolia diuideret. ad ecclesiae enim decus detracta ab his diabolo et gentium spolia diuiduntur atque etiam ex his spoliis domus pulchritudo perficitur, cum in sacerdotes dei ad ministerii sanctificationem ab aris templisque daemonum abstrahuntur sanctoque spiritu inrigati euangelizantes effectae sunt dilecti esse uirtutes.
And so that it might be understood that, according to the sweetness prepared for the poor, what is meant is either the gathering of the church, which is God’s inheritance, or the speech of apostolic preaching, he added: “God the Lord will give the word to those who preach good news with many powers, the king of the powers of the beloved, and to the beauty of the house to divide the spoils.” To the rain set apart for watering the gospel, then, the Lord will give the word, pouring it into our minds and mouths, according to this: “For it is not you who speak, but the Spirit of your Father who speaks in you.” But those who preach good news are many powers, to whom he will give the word: so that there is a power in Paul, a power in Peter, a power in John, and a power in the others; and he signifies that there are therefore many powers for preaching the gospel. Although God, Lord, and king will give the word to them, yet these powers are the beloved’s, that is, belong to him who is beloved by the king, Lord, and God. The Latin translation declares this laboriously and obscurely, since it does not change the arrangement of the words. But the speech as expressed in Greek states the whole more plainly: that this our God and Lord is the king of the powers that belong to the beloved; so that “powers” refers to the apostles and “beloved” to Christ, whose powers are understood to be either in these men or all these men themselves. Although there was one and the same Spirit in all, it was necessary, because of what follows, to mention numerous powers, since he himself would divide the spoils of the powers for the beauty of the house. For the spoils taken from the devil, and those of the nations, are divided for the adornment of the church; and from these spoils the beauty of the house is perfected, when they are drawn from the altars and temples of demons into priests of God for the sanctification of the ministry, and, watered by the Holy Spirit and preaching good news, they become the powers of the beloved.
67.13CSEL 22:288–289
Ad has enim easdem uirtutes, quae ad pulchritudinem domus uel spolia diuident uel ipsae sunt spolia, diuinus sermo se rettulit dicens: si dormiatis inter medios cleros, pinnae columbae deargentatae, et posteriora dorsi eius in uiriditate auri. prophetiae uota sunt, quibus manere in mediis cleris haec ad pulchritudinem domus diuisa spolia exoptat, ut usque ad consummationis suae diem — quia significari mors soleat in somno — in domus pulchritudine perseuerent. qui quidem sunt in usum praedicationis tamquam deargentatae pinnae columbae, id est sancti spiritus munere ornatuque pretiosi. in his autem, quae post eos sunt, in auri uiriditate consistent, ut his post praedicationem euangelii honor regius et indefessa aeternitas ex conscientiae suae fructu in auri uiriditate reddatur: dum et aurum refertur ad honorem et in uiriditate uigor aeternus ostenditur. posteriora itaque dorsi, quae interscapilia magis graecus sermo significat, id est quae bonae conscientiae atque honoris posteriora sint tempore, ultra praedicationis huius honorem sunt honoranda; cum interim deargentatae pinnae sub munere sancti spiritus permanentes post etiam ad conscientiae suae; fructum auri uiriditatem, id est florem honoris perpetui consequentur.
For to these same powers, which either divide the spoils for the beauty of the house or are themselves the spoils, the divine speech refers, saying: “If you sleep among the lots, the wings of a dove silvered over, and the hinder parts of her back in the greenness of gold.” These are the prayers of the prophecy, by which it desires that these spoils, divided for the beauty of the house, should remain in the midst of the lots, so that until the day of their completion (for death is usually signified by sleep) they may persevere in the beauty of the house. For the use of preaching they are like the silvered wings of a dove, that is, precious with the gift and adornment of the Holy Spirit. But in the things that come after them they will stand in the greenness of gold, so that after the preaching of the gospel royal honor and unwearied eternity may be rendered to them in the greenness of gold, from the fruit of their conscience: gold referring to honor, and greenness showing eternal vigor. The hinder parts of the back, then (which the Greek word means rather as the part between the shoulders), that is, the honors of good conscience that come later in time, are to be honored beyond the honor of this preaching; while meanwhile the silvered wings, remaining under the gift of the Holy Spirit, will afterward also attain, as the fruit of their conscience, the greenness of gold, that is, the flower of perpetual honor.
67.14CSEL 22:289–290
Ut autem haec ad pulchritudinem domus spolia diuisa, quibus ut inter medios cleros dormirent, id est. ut morte tales consummarentur, optatum est, ad principes ecclesiarum, per quos pulchritudo domus consistit, relata possint intellegi, continuo subiecit: dum discernit caelestis reges super eam, niue dealbabuntur in Selmon, monte dei, monte uberum; mons consecratus, mons pinguis. dum itaque hos caelestis super eam reges discernit, id est, dum dominus de caelis descendens eos, qui spolia fuerint, constituit in reges et super eam domum, quae per eos pulcherrima est, unumquemque disponit: in Selmon niue dealbabuntur, in pace scilicet, quia Selmon interpretatio pacis est, gloriam aeternitatis accipient. hic enim dei mons, in quo pax dei nominis ipsius est significata uirtute, et uber et consecratus et pinguis est. reges autem esse eos non obscurum est, de quibus dictum est: iam sine nobis regnastis et utinam regnaretis: ut et nos uobiscum conregnaremus. dominus ergo caelestis — quia qualis caelestis, tales et caelestes — hos in Selmon reges super domum suam, per quos diuisis spoliis ornabitur, exalbatos niue disponet in reges. factus est enim in pace locus eius et phoenicium secundum Esaiam ut nix dealbabitur. sed reges necesse est, penes quos sit domus pulchritudo, ultra candorem niuis esse praestari. lux enim mundi sunt; et quisque dignus erit cum domino montem regni caelestis inscendere, super niuem dealbabitur: quia cum se apostolis in habitu, quo cum sanctis conregnaturus esset, ostendit, uestimenta eius super niuem alba sunt uisa. hic ergo mons et hoc regnum deo pacis est.
And so that these spoils divided for the beauty of the house, for whom it was wished that they might sleep among the lots, that is, be completed in death as such, might be understood as referring to the leaders of the churches, through whom the beauty of the house stands, he added at once: “While the heavenly one appoints kings over it, they will be made white as snow in Salmon, the mountain of God, a mountain of abundance; a consecrated mountain, a fat mountain.” While the heavenly one, then, appoints these kings over it, that is, while the Lord, coming down from heaven, establishes as kings those who were spoils and sets each one over the house that is most beautiful through them, they will be made white with snow in Salmon; that is, in peace, for Salmon means peace, they will receive the glory of eternity. For this mountain of God, in which the peace of God is signified by the force of the name itself, is abundant, consecrated, and fat. That they are kings is not obscure, those of whom it was said: “Already you have reigned without us; and would that you did reign, so that we too might reign with you.” The heavenly Lord, then (for as is the heavenly, such also are the heavenly), will set these kings over his house in Salmon, through whom it will be adorned with the divided spoils, made white with snow, as kings. For his place was made in peace, and according to Isaiah scarlet will be made white as snow. But the kings in whose keeping the beauty of the house lies must be made brighter than the whiteness of snow. For they are the light of the world; and everyone who will be worthy to climb with the Lord the mountain of the heavenly kingdom will be made white above snow; for when he showed himself to the apostles in the appearance in which he would reign with the saints, his garments were seen to be white above snow. This mountain, then, and this kingdom belong to the God of peace.
67.15CSEL 22:290–291
Sed plerique sunt, qui ecclesiae pacem sub haereticorum consortio mentiuntur, dissoluentes noui ac ueteris testamenti conexam sibi coniunctamque rationem, dum plerique alium euangeliorum, alium deum legis effingunt. nonnulli uero aduersum unigeniti dei naturam nomenque uenientes ex tempore natum solum hominem confitentur, neque ex forma dei in formam serui esse deductum, sed ex forma serui tantum esse coepisse confingunt. plures autem non uerae diuinitatis deum neque ex paternae maiestatis naturaeque proprietate subsistere disserunt: sed externae substantiae; deoque diuersae, quae in adoptionem filii electa sit, modo creaturarum ex nihilo. quibus nulla origo anterior sit, constiterit. plures etiam in corpus atque ex se protensum permanantemque patrem loquantur, ut adsumptio illa carnis ex uirgine filii nomen acceperit, non qui antea erat dei filius, idem hominis filius sit natus in corpore. et quidem omnia haec ad speciem humanae prudentiae coaptantur, postquam rationem caelestis sapientiae non conprehenderunt; quibus, ut spero, aliis locis uberius copiosiusque responsum est.,
But there are many who falsely claim the peace of the church in fellowship with heretics, breaking apart the connected and joined account of the New and Old Testaments, since many invent one God of the Gospels and another of the law. Some, coming against the nature and name of the only-begotten God, confess him to be only a man born in time, and pretend that he was not brought down from the form of God into the form of a servant, but began to exist only from the form of a servant. Many argue that he is not God of true divinity, nor subsists from the proper character of the Father’s majesty and nature, but is of an external substance, different from God, chosen for adoption as Son, and came to be out of nothing in the manner of creatures, having no earlier origin. Many also speak of the Father as extended out of himself and flowing into a body, so that that assumption of flesh from the Virgin received the name of Son, and it was not the one who was formerly the Son of God who was born in the body as the same Son of man. All these things are fitted to the appearance of human prudence, since they did not grasp the account of heavenly wisdom; they have been answered, as I hope, more fully and abundantly in other places.
67.16CSEL 22:291–292
Quia ergo uerae fidei una haec sedis est, deo quae sit placita, et hic aeterni regni mons unus in pace sit, de susceptis plurimis arguit nos propheta dicens: ut quid suscepistis montes caseatos? lac, cum corrumpitur, densatur et ex uitio in coaguli caseique speciem concrescit. nam utrumque id unus graecitatis sermo conplectitur. ergo sicuti ex natura sua lac ipsum uitio accedente degenerat et quadam sui corruptione coacescit, ita haec genera doctrinarum, quae initia cognitionis ex innoxio sincerique lacte deducant, conrumpuntur in uitia fiuntque corruptione sui coagulata uel caseata, ne lac sint. quod idipsum loco alio ita meminit: coagulauit sicut lac cor eorum: ego uero legem tuam meditatus sum; quia consiliis gestisque impietatis cor infectum, cum per infantiae simplicitatem naturam lactis habuisset, uitiorum postea corruptione degenerans in coagulum densatum esset atque concretum. referendus ergo ab his omnibus et sensus et studium est, neque quisquam alius magis, quam hic mons pacis, habitandus est. nam post exprobrationem caseatorum coagulatorumque montium continuo subiecit: mons, in quo beneplacitum est deo habitare: in eo etenim dominus habitabit usque in finem, in eo monte aeternae habitationis sedem deo ostendens esse conplacitam, qui ad sedem pacis esset electus.
Since, then, this is the one seat of true faith that is pleasing to God, and this is the one mountain of the eternal kingdom, in peace, the prophet reproaches us about the many we have received, saying: “Why have you received curdled mountains?” Milk, when it is spoiled, thickens and from the fault grows together into the form of curd and cheese; for one Greek word covers both. So, just as milk itself degenerates from its own nature when a fault comes upon it and turns sour through a kind of corruption of itself, so these kinds of teachings, which derive the beginnings of knowledge from harmless and pure milk, are corrupted into faults and by their own corruption become curdled or cheesy, so as no longer to be milk. He recalls this very thing in another place thus: “Their heart has curdled like milk; but I have meditated on your law”; because the heart, infected by counsels and deeds of impiety, though in the simplicity of infancy it had had the nature of milk, afterward degenerated through the corruption of vices into curd, thickened and clotted. Our mind and zeal, then, must be drawn back from all these, and no other mountain must be inhabited more than this mountain of peace. For after reproaching the cheesy and curdled mountains he added at once: “the mountain in which it pleased God to dwell; for the Lord will dwell in it to the end,” showing that the seat of eternal dwelling pleasing to God is in that mountain which was chosen as the seat of peace.
67.17CSEL 22:292
Sed quia post legis tempora cireumcisionisque praescripta sacrificiorumque praecepta per euangelicae confessionis fidem ab his, qui. gloriantur in lege, id est a carnali Israhel, quaedam per nos uidetur pacis dei facta esse mutatio cognitionisque alterius, quam in lege praescripta est, introducta confessio, cum nos omnia per dominum Iesum Christum, quaecumque praecepta sunt lege, in euangelicam spem adumbrata esse doceamus illis contra deum patrem secum locutum ac legem dedisse iactantibus: respondendum est, hac ipsa psalmi prophetia per angelos potius legem in manu mediatoris esse dispositam neque a nobis quicquam esse mutatum. sed in his manere. quae? sola sunt, id est unam eandemque sedem dei pacis incolere, cum quando eundem praedicatorem euangelii dominum Iesum Christum, quem et latorem legis habeamus. post unius enim conplaciti deo montis sedem, quam usque in finem caelestis habitabit, ut sedis haec euangelicae pacis praeformata per mediatorem legis intellegeretur in lege, continuo subiecit: currus dei decem milium multiplex, milia laetantium: dominus in illis in Sina, in sancto ascendit in altum, cepit captiuitatem, dedit dona in hominibus. etenim non credentes inhabitare.
But since, after the times of the law, the rules of circumcision, and the precepts of sacrifices, those who glory in the law, that is, carnal Israel, think that through the faith of the gospel confession a change of God’s peace has been made by us and a confession of another knowledge introduced than that prescribed in the law (since we teach that all that was commanded by the law was a foreshadowing, through the Lord Jesus Christ, of the gospel hope), when they boast against us that God the Father spoke with them and gave them the law, we must answer from this very prophecy of the psalm that the law was ordained rather through angels in the hand of a mediator, and that nothing has been changed by us; but that we remain in the things that alone are, that is, that we dwell in one and the same seat of the God of peace, since we hold the same Lord Jesus Christ to be both the preacher of the gospel and the giver of the law. For after the seat of the one mountain pleasing to God, which the heavenly one will inhabit to the end, so that this seat of gospel peace might be understood to have been prefigured in the law through the mediator of the law, he added at once: “The chariot of God is ten thousandfold, thousands of those who rejoice; the Lord is among them in Sinai, in the holy one; he ascended on high, he took captivity captive, he gave gifts among men. For they did not believe that they would dwell.”
67.18CSEL 22:292–293
Fidem omnem breuia ha'c quidem uerba significant, sed qu;« uirtutibus suis magna et infinita conplexa sunt. hanc autem currus siue sedis dei dignitatem haud dissimiliter Daniel propheta descripsit dicens: sedis eius flamma: ignis ardens rotae eius: flumen ignis ducebat ante eum: milia milium seruiebant ei et dena milia denum milium adstabant ei. atque in his quidem, siue sub specie talis ornatus, siue sub significationis exemplo, nobis in curru opinio et sensus comitatus caelestis adfertur, ut sub concordi iugo milibus laetantium obsequellam caelestem intellegamus. et hoc illae in Sina ardentes faces conlucentesque ignes, ingrauescentia tonitrua et totius domini aduentus terror ostendit, ministeria scilicet angelorum legem in manu mediatoris disponentium adstitisse. hic ergo currus dei decem milium multiplex est miliaque laetantium sunt. et quia mediator dei hominumque sit dominus, in cuius manu per angelos, ut dictum est, lata lex fuerit, sequens sermo subiecit: dominus in illis in Sina, in illis scilicet laetantibus milibus: currusque numero multiplici decem milium, id est infinitorum intellegentia sub decem milium multiplicatione subiecta. in his itaque deus in Sina est.
These words are brief, but they signify the whole faith, embracing in their force things great and infinite. The prophet Daniel described the dignity of this chariot or throne of God in much the same way, saying: “His throne was flame; his wheels burning fire; a river of fire went before him; thousands of thousands served him, and ten thousand times ten thousand stood by him.” In these words, whether under the appearance of such adornment or by way of figurative example, a conception and sense of the heavenly retinue in a chariot is conveyed to us, so that under a harmonious yoke we may understand the heavenly service of the thousands who rejoice. And this was shown at Sinai by the burning torches, the gleaming fires, the deepening thunders, and the terror of the Lord’s whole coming: that the ministries of angels stood by, ordaining the law in the hand of a mediator. This, then, is God’s chariot, ten thousandfold, and these are the thousands of those who rejoice. And since the Lord is the mediator of God and men, in whose hand the law was given through angels, as has been said, the following words added: “The Lord is among them in Sinai,” among those rejoicing thousands, namely, and the chariot of manifold number of ten thousands, that is, the notion of the infinite placed under the multiplication of ten thousand. Among these, then, God is in Sinai.
67.19CSEL 22:293–294
Sed ne forte euangelia non supplementa legis aliquatenus uiderentur. qui in illis in Sina est dominus, hic rursum in sancto ascendit in altum captiuamque cepit captiuitatem. in eo scilicet sancto, cuius formam ex forma dei euacuatus accepit. quod autem sanctus sit, cum plures prophetiae tum Gabriel angelus ad Mariam testatur dicens: et quod ex te nascetur sanctum, uocabitur filius dei; et daemones clamant: scimus qui sis, sanctus dei. in sancto ergo ascendit in altum. et quid illud sit ascendere in altum, sub huius ipsius dicti significatione Paulus docuit dicens: ascendit autem quid est, nisi quia et descendit in inferiora terrae? qui descendit, ipse est qui et ascendit super omnes caelos. ascendens ergo in altum et sese hominem ex mortuis in caelestibus reuehens accepit eos, qui a diabolo erant capti, quos et ad pulchritudinem domus spolia diuisit. dehinc dona in hominibus accepit, cum primogenitus ex mortuis de se ipse testatur dicens: dominus dixit ad me: filius meus es tu, ego hodie genui te. posce a me, et dabo tibi gentes hereditatem tuam et possessionem tuam terminos terrae. accepit ergo dona in hominibus, gentes scilicet in hereditatem; in quibus in -sancto in altum primogenitus ex mortuis capta captiuitate conscendit. et quia ultra humanae spei fidem sit, eum terrenae carnis corruptionem in caelestem gloriam transtulisse gentesque impias et ante uitiorum ac superstitionum furore peruasas ad cognitionem dei consortiumque esse deductas, ob hoc in his dona hominibus accepit, qui se cum deo habitaturos esse non crederent. atque ita huius mediatoris ex lege consummata cognitio est, ut. qui in laetantium milibus in Sina fuisset, hic idem in sancto rursum in altum captiua captiuitate conscendens dona nos, qui secum cohabitaturos diffidebamus, acciperet.
But lest the Gospels should seem in any way not to be the fulfillment of the law, the Lord who is among them in Sinai is the same who in turn ascended on high in the holy one and took captivity captive: in that holy one, namely, whose form he took when emptied from the form of God. That he is holy, many prophecies testify, and so does the angel Gabriel, saying to Mary: “And what is born of you, holy, will be called Son of God”; and the demons cry: “We know who you are, the Holy One of God.” In the holy one, then, he ascended on high. And what it is to ascend on high Paul taught under the meaning of this very saying, saying: “But what is ‘he ascended’ except that he also descended into the lower parts of the earth? He who descended is the same who also ascended above all the heavens.” Ascending on high, then, and carrying himself back as man from the dead into the heavenly places, he received those who had been captured by the devil, whom he also divided as spoils for the beauty of the house. Then he received gifts among men, when the firstborn from the dead testifies of himself, saying: “The Lord said to me: You are my Son; today I have begotten you. Ask of me, and I will give you the nations as your inheritance and the ends of the earth as your possession.” He received, then, gifts among men, namely the nations as an inheritance; among whom, in the holy one, the firstborn from the dead went up on high, having taken captivity captive. And since it is beyond the reach of human hope that he carried the corruption of earthly flesh over into heavenly glory, and that impious nations, formerly possessed by the frenzy of vices and superstitions, were brought to the knowledge and fellowship of God, he therefore received gifts among those men who did not believe that they would dwell with God. And so the knowledge of this mediator from the law is complete: that he who had been among the thousands rejoicing in Sinai is the same who, again ascending on high in the holy one, having taken captivity captive, received as gifts us who despaired of dwelling with him.
67.20CSEL 22:294–295
Post hanc itaque contra spei nostrae diffidentiam acceptorum in hominibus donorum hereditatem digna haec ad deum prophetae subiecta confessio est: dominus deus benedictus de die in diem, prosperum iter nobis faciet deus salutarium nostrorum. benedictus itaque dominus et deus est ascendens in altum, capiens captiuitatem, in hominibus dona percipiens, eos qui scilicet inhabitaturos se esse non crederent. cotidie autem per populi credentis accessionem benedictionis multiplicatur augeturque confessio, cum gentiles superstitiones impiseque de diis fabulae, cum arae daemonum, cum idolorum inania relincuntur et iter omnibus ac profectus dirigitur in salutem. hic igitur salut-arium nostrorum dominus ac deus est, cuius de die in diem benedictionum significatur idolorum. In eo enim, quod cotidie est, continuatur et semper, cum tanta seui protendatur infinitas, quanta et dierum post dies successio consequatur.
After this inheritance of gifts received among men, against the despair of our hope, there follows this fitting confession of the prophet to God: “Blessed be the Lord God from day to day; God will make our journey prosperous, the God of our salvation.” Blessed, then, is the Lord and God who ascends on high, takes captivity captive, and receives gifts among men, namely those who did not believe that they would dwell. Daily, through the increase of the believing people, the confession of blessing is multiplied and grows, when pagan superstitions and impious fables about gods, when the altars of demons and the vanities of idols are abandoned, and the journey and progress of all is directed toward salvation. This, then, is the Lord and God of our salvation, whose blessing from day to day is signified. For in what is daily, there is continuance and always, since the infinity of the age stretches as far as the succession of day after day follows.
67.21CSEL 22:295–297
Cautissime autem semper propheticus sermo, ne quis per gentiles fabulas philosophiaeque doctrinam notionem nostram de diuinae ueritatis scientia perturbaret, admonuit; quia uariae eorum impiissimaeque sententiae multa de deo stulte profaneque conplexae sunt. nos uero ad cognitionem dei patris et dei filii instituti sacramentum sumus uerae eaelestisque prudentiae in eo, quod uerbum caro factum est. consecuti. ipsum enim nobis, quod Iudaeis scandalum, gentibus uero stultitia est, id est dei passio, crux, mors, sepultura siue per rationem diuinae uoluntatis perfecta caelestisque sapientia est, siue per resurrectionis potestatem uirtutis aeternitas est. ad huius igitur nos propheta scientiam dei, qui nobis et passus et mortuus est et resurrexit et dominus est, instituit dicens: deus noster deus saluos faciendi, et domini exitus mortis: eum nobis deum intimans, qui, cum esset deus, omnia ad salutis nostrae incrementa susciperet. et idcirco hic deus noster est, quia deus eorum sit, qui fient salui. saluos autem nos per id deus noster effecit, quod exitus sit mortis egressus; id enim his uerbis, quae latine minus expresse atque absolute translata sunt, continetur. admonui enim superius, plerumque interpretes cunctos, dum conlocationem ordinemque uerborum demutare ac tempe-. rare non audent, minus dilucide proprietatem declarasse dictorum. uerumtamen in his, quae dicta sunt: deus noster deus saluos faciendi, et domini exitus mortis, et salutis nostrae deus et exitus eius ultra exitum mortis ostenditur. quia mortis exitus domini sint. omnibus enim, qui ueniunt in uitam, ingressus in mortem est; sed primogenito ex mortuis tantum proprius fuit egressus ex morte. atque ideo proprius exitus mortis est domini, quia adsumptae ab eo carnis haec uirtus sit, ut naturae nostrae corruptionem in gloriam caelestem post exitus mortis efferat. uerum susceptae mortis ipsius non fuit occultanda uel causa, uel ratio; et quid nobis unigenitus deus ex • forma dei exinanitus et formam serui adsumens adferret auxilii, oportuit ad fidei nostrae et securitatem et scientiam reuelari.
The prophetic speech has always warned most carefully that no one should disturb our notion of the knowledge of divine truth through pagan fables and the teaching of philosophy; for their varied and most impious opinions have embraced many foolish and profane things about God. But we, instructed in the knowledge of God the Father and God the Son, have attained the mystery of true and heavenly wisdom in this, that the Word became flesh. For that very thing which is a stumbling block to the Jews and folly to the Gentiles, that is, the passion, cross, death, and burial of God, is for us either perfect and heavenly wisdom by reason of the divine will, or the eternity of power by the might of the resurrection. To the knowledge of this God, then, who suffered, died, and rose for us and is Lord, the prophet instructs us, saying: “Our God is the God of saving, and the Lord’s are the issues of death”: making known to us that God who, being God, undertook all things for the increase of our salvation. And therefore he is our God, because he is the God of those who will be saved. And our God made us saved through this, that the issue of death was his going out; for this is contained in these words, which have been translated into Latin less expressly and plainly. For I have warned above that almost all translators, not daring to change and adjust the arrangement and order of words, have declared the proper sense of the sayings less clearly. Yet in the words “Our God is the God of saving, and the Lord’s are the issues of death,” both the God of our salvation and his going out beyond the issue of death are shown, because the issues of death are the Lord’s. For all who come into life have an entry into death; but only to the firstborn from the dead was going out from death proper. And therefore the issue of death is properly the Lord’s, because this is the power of the flesh he took, that after the issues of death it carries the corruption of our nature into heavenly glory. But neither the cause nor the reason of the death he undertook was to be hidden; and what help the only-begotten God, emptied from the form of God and taking the form of a servant, brought us, had to be revealed for the security and knowledge of our faith.
67.22CSEL 22:297
Et primum quidem non alienum a dei misericordia et bonitate uideri potest, ut uitam omnibus in se ipso restitueret ex mortuis: namque qui primum animam nobis ad flatum respirationemque uiuendi, cum hominem secundum imaginem sui similitudinemque constituit, de thensauris potestatis suae diuinitalisque diffuderit. secundum apostolum enim ipsius genus sumus et secundum eundem: omnia ex ipso et per ipsum et in ipso sunt: scilicet ut in ipso habitatio nostra atque incolatus ostensa sit sedis, dum omnia inmensa uirtutis potestate conplexus est; per ipsum uero originis inchoatae opus effectusque monstraretur. cum in nobis id ipsum. quod sumus. operatus sit; ex ipso autem initia uitae ad exordia spiritus indulta notescerent. non fuit ergo a beneficentia diuinae bonitatis alienum, ut qui ex se ipso nobis, qui eius genus sumus. uitae ac spiritus elementa tribuisset, in se ipso quoque nobis per unigenitum deum aetemitatis nostrae inchoaret exordia. uereque nunc et ex ipso et per ipsum et in ipso maneremus, cum quando nos in hac habitatione ac sede mundi huius, qui omnia in omnibus est, conlocatus rursum plenius iam atque perfectius in se ac per se atque ex se inita carnis nostrae societate post exitus mortis iam conlocaret aeternos. haec quidem ad significationem diuinae bonitatis ita dicta sint.
And first, it cannot seem foreign to God’s mercy and goodness that he should restore life to all from the dead in himself: for it was he who first poured out the soul into us from the treasuries of his power and divinity, for the breath and respiration of living, when he established man according to his image and likeness. For according to the apostle we are his offspring, and according to the same: “All things are from him and through him and in him”: so that in him our dwelling and the abode of our sojourn might be shown, since he embraces all things by the immense might of his power; and through him the work and accomplishment of our begun origin might be shown, since he worked in us that very thing which we are; and from him the beginnings of life granted for the first breath of the spirit might be known. It was not foreign, then, to the beneficence of divine goodness that he who from himself had given us, who are his offspring, the elements of life and spirit, should also in himself, through the only-begotten God, begin for us the first beginnings of our eternity. And truly we would now remain both from him and through him and in him, since he who is all in all, having set us in this dwelling and seat of this world, would again, more fully and perfectly, having entered into fellowship with our flesh, set us, now eternal after the issues of death, in himself, through himself, and from himself. Let these things be said thus to signify the divine goodness.
67.23CSEL 22:297–299
Sed suscipienda? ab unigenito deo carnis adeundaeque' mortis et per apostolum et nunc per prophetam grandior profundiorque ratio tractatur. ac primum quid in crucis sacramento atque mortis ab unigenito deo et domino maiestatis effectum sit, per apostolum intellegamus, ut duce eo docti prophetise scientiam consequamur. ait enim ita: et uos, cum essetis mortui in peccatis et praeputio corporis uestri, conuiuificauit cum illo donans nobis omnia peccata, delens quod aduersus nos fuit chirographum in sententiis, quod erat contrarium nobis, tollens illud de medio et adfigens illud cruci, spolians se carne, et principatus et potestates ostentui fecit cum fiducia triumphans eos in semetipso. sacramentum itaque salutis nostrae primum resurgens ipse ex mortuis decretumque mortis nostrae, quo ante detinebamur, absoluens in se ipso, qui ex mortuis aeternus iam maneret, impleuit. sed in eo ipso, quod nobis uitae auctor in se est, dum per adsumptionem corporis homo natus et mortuus iam rursum aeternus ex mortuis est, omnes quoque inimicas uirtutes mundique potestates principesque aeris huius ostentui reddidit, id est uel nostrae spei uel suae damnationis fecit ostenta et ipsos quaedam quasi ex diis saeculi portenta constituit his ipsis in se cum fiducia triumphatis: dum et per securitatem aeternitatis mors ipsa in deo moriente fiducia est et auctores mortis humanae, dum etiam in se ipso per occupatum a satana cor Iudae auctores sunt mortis, triumphat ex mortuis, ut neque a poena mortis abessent, cum se usque ad mortis infirmitatem subiecisset aeternus, et omnem poenam humanae mortis exciperent ut auctores, cum in aeternitatis dominum auctores mortis per id, quod uerbum caro factum est, extitissent. haec quidem ita apostolus.
But a greater and deeper reason for the only-begotten God taking flesh and going to death is treated both by the apostle and now by the prophet. And first let us understand through the apostle what was accomplished by the only-begotten God and Lord of majesty in the mystery of the cross and death, so that, taught by him as guide, we may attain the knowledge of the prophecy. For he says thus: “And you, when you were dead in sins and in the uncircumcision of your body, he made alive together with him, forgiving us all sins, blotting out the handwriting in decrees that was against us, which was contrary to us, taking it out of the way and nailing it to the cross; stripping himself of the flesh, he made a show of principalities and powers, confidently triumphing over them in himself.” The mystery of our salvation, then, he fulfilled first by rising himself from the dead and by cancelling in himself the decree of our death, by which we were previously held, since he would now remain eternal from the dead. But in that very fact by which he is in himself the author of life for us, since through the assumption of a body he was born a man and died and is again eternal from the dead, he also made a show of all the hostile powers, the powers of the world and the princes of this air; that is, he made them displays either of our hope or of their own condemnation, and set them up as monstrous spectacles out of the gods of the age, confidently triumphing over them in himself. For through the security of eternity death itself, in God dying, is confidence; and the authors of human death, since, through the heart of Judas seized by Satan, they are authors of death even against him, he triumphs over from the dead: so that they should not escape the penalty of death, since he who is eternal had submitted himself even to the weakness of death, and that they should receive the whole penalty of human death as its authors, since they had become the authors of death against the Lord of eternity through the Word having become flesh. So the apostle says.
67.24CSEL 22:299–300
Sed propheta breuibus licet, sed eandem intellegentiam uerbis significantibus eadem ista conplexus est. nam ubi dominum in exitum mortis ostenderat, subiecit: uerumtamen conquassauit capita inimicorum suorum, uerticem capilli deambulantium in delictis suis. principatus enim ac potestates, in quibus capita inimicorum significantur, fecit ostentui. haec igitur in mortis exitu conquassat, quorum spiritalem nequitiam atque naturam in eo, quod capilli uerticem perambulent, docet, dum et tamquam dominantes hominum capitibus insistunt et tamquam nequitiae spiritales sine sensu eorum, quibus insistunt, ipsum illum capilli uerticem proculcent; quia et ipsa scilicet corpora usque ad anima; mentisque sedem sine sensu adeundi interlabantur et penetrent. aeris enim huius sunt potestates; et ideo capilli uerticem perambulant uel insistendi leuitate uel potestate dominandi et toto in orbe per momenta singula commeantes. sed haec in delictis suis peragunt, dum unicuique in eo, quod delinquat, auctores sunt secundum' illud apostoli: deus filium suum misit in similitudine carnis peccati et de peccato condemnauit peccatum in carne; cum causam in his exordiumque peccati ex eo ipso, quod in carne sua per instinctum proditionis peccant, id est de peccato carnis peccatum in carne condemnat.
But the prophet, though in brief words, embraced these same things with words that signify the same understanding. For when he had shown the Lord in the issue of death, he added: “But God will shatter the heads of his enemies, the crown of the hair of those who walk about in their sins.” For he made a show of the principalities and powers, by which the heads of the enemies are meant. These, then, he shatters in the issue of death, and he teaches their spiritual wickedness and nature by their walking over the crown of the hair: since they both press upon men’s heads as if ruling them, and, as spiritual wickednesses, trample that very crown of the hair without the awareness of those they press upon; because they slip into and penetrate even the bodies themselves, up to the seat of the soul and mind, without their approach being felt. For they are the powers of this air; and therefore they walk over the crown of the hair, either by the lightness of their pressing or by the power of ruling, passing over the whole world in single moments. But they do these things in their sins, since they are the authors to each person of the sin he commits, according to this saying of the apostle: “God sent his Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and from sin he condemned sin in the flesh”; since he condemns in them the cause and beginning of sin from that very thing by which they sin in his flesh through the prompting of the betrayal, that is, from the sin of the flesh he condemns sin in the flesh.
67.25CSEL 22:300–301
Tenet itaque diuinae dispensationis ordinem propheticus sermo et euangeliorum opera adumbrata esse per legem ipsis illis legis operibus declarat. multa enim plerumque per nominum proprietates ita expressa atque absoluta sunt, ut non magis gerendis in praesens potius quam in futurum significandis rebus inpensa sint: ut nunc post tantas ac tam manifestas euangelicae spei praedicationes altius quiddam nobis et ultra aurium sensum adfert subiectus ordo dictorum: dixit dominus: ex Basan conuertar in profundum maris. uidetur enim hic sermo domini fuisse, cum ad diuidendum ad iter mare exerendamque in Pharao iram est conuersus. sed numquid ex Basan conuersum eum esse lex docuit? non utique. Basan uero est ciuitas hostilis quondam regni, quae fuit Og regis habitatio; sed interpretatio nominis pudorem confusionemque significat. potest quidem uideri, ut ex pudore populi in Aegypto seruientis, cum depressus a Pharao ipsam illam conseruandi educandique generis libertatem perdidisset, in profundum maris. id est ad liberandi populi sui magnificentiam deus esset conuersus. sed qui secundum proximum huic psalmum dixerit: salua me, deus, quoniam intrauerunt aquae usque ad animam meam; infixus sum in limum profundi et non est substantia; ueni in altitudinem maris, et tempestas demersit me, non ambigendus est post humani corporis pudorem — quia ipsae illae corporum atque elementorum nostrorum origines sint pudendae — in hoc mare, id est in hanc saeculi tempestatem esse conuersus, ut usque ad ultimae confusionis uerecundiam subiectus crucis morti per eam in se inimicorum capita conquassaret, spiritales scilicet nequitias potestatesque omnes et principatus aeris huius reddens ostentui triumpharet, cum eos aeternitati poenae, postquam ipse et passus et mortuus est, destinaret. ob id ergo conuersus in profundum maris intellegendus est, id est usque ad ultimas descendisse saeculi passiones, ut conculcans capita inimicorum ultionem diuinae potestatis exereret.
The prophetic speech, then, keeps the order of the divine dispensation, and by those very works of the law it declares that the works of the Gospels were foreshadowed through the law. For many things are often so expressed and completed through the proper meanings of names that they were spent no more on things done in the present than on things to be signified for the future: as now, after so many and such manifest proclamations of the gospel hope, the following order of sayings brings us something deeper and beyond the sense of the ears: “The Lord said: From Bashan I will turn into the depth of the sea.” This seems to have been a word of the Lord when he turned to divide the sea for the journey and to unleash his anger on Pharaoh. But did the law teach that he turned from Bashan? Certainly not. Bashan is a city of what was once a hostile kingdom, the residence of King Og; but the interpretation of the name means shame and confusion. It may indeed seem that God turned from the shame of the people serving in Egypt, when, oppressed by Pharaoh, they had lost the very freedom to preserve and raise their offspring, into the depth of the sea, that is, to the magnificence of freeing his people. But he who in the psalm next to this one said: “Save me, O God, for the waters have come in even to my soul; I am stuck fast in the mire of the deep, and there is no standing; I came into the depth of the sea, and the storm overwhelmed me,” must without doubt be understood, after the shame of the human body (for the very origins of our bodies and elements are shameful), to have turned into this sea, that is, into this storm of the world, so that, subjected even to the disgrace of the utmost confusion, the death of the cross, he might through it shatter the heads of the enemies in himself, triumphing by making a show of the spiritual wickednesses and all the powers and principalities of this air, when, after he himself had suffered and died, he destined them to eternal punishment. For this reason, then, he is to be understood as having turned into the depth of the sea, that is, as having descended even to the utmost sufferings of the world, so that, trampling the heads of the enemies, he might exercise the vengeance of divine power.
67.26CSEL 22:301–302
Quod ipsum uidetur sequens sermo conplecti, cum dicitur: ut intinguatur pes tuus in sanguine: lingua canum tuorum ex inimicis ab ipso. diuinae autem ultionis ira sub humanae uindictae significatur exemplo. ex Basan enim in profundum maris conuersus ob id est, uti pes intinguatur in sanguine atque ab ipso sanguine, qui ex inimicis est, canum quoque lingua tinguatur. haec uero accidere solent omnibus bello consumptis et captiuitate deletis et pro uictorum arbitrio atque ultione punitis. per humanae itaque, ut dixi, consuetudinis morem. cum gladius, cum arcus, cum sagitta, cum framea, cum reliqua pcenarum ac mortium arma memorantur, diuinae seueritatis significantur officia. et haec quidem Iudaeis post crucem et mortem domini omnia acciderunt, cum a Romanis capti uniuersa suppliciorum ac miseriarum genera perpessi sunt, ut peremptorum sanguine et incedentium pedes tincti sint et canum lingua satiata sit. sed id non minus ad eorum poenam damnationemque referendum est, qui ostentui redditi cum fiducia triumphantur.
The following words seem to embrace this very thing, when it is said: “that your foot may be dipped in blood, the tongue of your dogs in it from the enemies.” The anger of divine vengeance is signified by the example of human revenge. For he turned from Bashan into the depth of the sea for this purpose, that his foot might be dipped in blood, and that the tongue of dogs too might be dipped in that very blood which comes from the enemies. These things usually happen to all who are destroyed in war, wiped out by captivity, and punished at the will and vengeance of the victors. So, as I said, through the manner of human custom, when sword, bow, arrow, spear, and the other weapons of punishment and death are mentioned, the offices of divine severity are signified. All these things indeed befell the Jews after the cross and death of the Lord, when, captured by the Romans, they suffered every kind of torment and misery, so that the feet of those who walked were dipped in the blood of the slain and the tongue of dogs was sated. But this is no less to be referred to the punishment and condemnation of those who were made a show of and triumphed over with confidence.
67.27CSEL 22:302–303
Et quia sub his, quae in ludaeae populo temporibus legis expleta sunt, uniuersarum fere gentium ad speciem futurae misericordiae salus est inchoata, ut per id. quod tum gestum est, id quoque, quod postea gerendum esset, doceretur, cum ipsos illos, in quos illa tum gerebantur, et inumbratio nubis et iter maris et mannae spiritalis cibus et spiritalis potus ex petra in spe euangelica fideque concluderet: nunc quoque, ut semper, in his ipsis noui ac ueteris testamenti per prophetam facta conexio est, cum dicit: uisa sunt itinera tua, deus, itinera dei mei, regis, qui est in sancto. praeuenerunt principes coniuncti psallentibus in medio iuuenum tympanistriarum. in ecclesiis benedicite dominum de fontibus Israhel. ibi Beniamin iunior in pauore, principes Iuda duces eorum, principes Zabulon, principes Nepthalim. dei quidem itinera sunt uisa, cum coactis in glaciem aquis praeeunte eo in columna ignis et nubis iter populo siccatum est, cum in medio tympanistriarum. iuuenes psallentes gloriose glorificatum dominum cantauerunt. sed nouimus itinera et alia regis in sancto, cum uirtutibus caelestibus animisque sanctorum iter eius praeeuntibus in eo, qui primae sabbati psalmus est, cantatur: tollite portas principis uestri, et eleuamini, portae aeternales, et introibit rex gloriae. quia est iste rex gloriae? dominus uirtutum ipse est rex gloriae. et haec itaque dei nostri et regis in sancto itinera sunt uisa, cum ingressum eius tanta caelestium coetuum gaudia praeeunt.
And since, under the things that were fulfilled in the people of Judea in the times of the law, the salvation of almost all the nations was begun as an image of future mercy, so that through what was done then what was to be done later might also be taught (when the very people for whom those things were then done were enclosed in the gospel hope and faith by the shadow of the cloud, the passage through the sea, the spiritual food of manna, and the spiritual drink from the rock), now too, as always, in these very things the connection of the New and Old Testaments has been made through the prophet, when he says: “Your ways have been seen, O God, the ways of my God, the king, who is in the holy one. The princes went before, joined with those singing psalms, in the midst of young women playing timbrels. In the churches bless the Lord from the fountains of Israel. There is Benjamin the younger in fear, the princes of Judah their leaders, the princes of Zebulun, the princes of Naphtali.” The ways of God were indeed seen when, the waters gathered into ice, he going before in the pillar of fire and cloud, a dry road was made for the people, when, in the midst of the women with timbrels, the young singing psalms sang of the Lord gloriously glorified. But we know other ways too of the king in the holy one, when, the heavenly powers and the souls of the saints going before him on his way, there is sung in the psalm that belongs to the first day of the week: “Lift up your gates, princes, and be lifted up, eternal gates, and the king of glory will come in. Who is this king of glory? The Lord of powers, he is the king of glory.” These ways too, then, of our God and king in the holy one were seen, when such great joys of heavenly companies went before his entry.
67.28CSEL 22:303–304
Sed quia quae ante praeformata in Pharao et in Israhel. fuerant, in diaboli suorumque clade et populorum omnium salute perfecta sunt, non ad synagogae confessionem, sed ad ecclesiae benedictionem nos cohortatur propheta, ut, quibus dei et regis in sancto itinera essent uisa, firmaret, dicens: in ecclesiis benedicite dominum de fontibus Israhel, ei initiis scilicet legis atque adumbratione gestorum doctrinam ecclesiae defluxisse commemorans. ac ne quid benedicentibus ecclesiis ambiguitatis existeret, quis hic maximus euangelicae spei praedicator futurus esset, ostendit dicens: ibi Beniamin iunior in pauore, in ecclesiae scilicet fontibus Beniamin iunior in pauore mansurus; post consternationem enim pauoris in euangelium Christi de tribu Beniamin Paulus electus est, matutino deuoratas carnes ad uesperum diuidens in salutem. ceteros quoque principes luda, ne ignorentur, ostendit, id est, qui ab eo, qui de Iuda frutice expectatio gentium futurus erat. eligendi essent, reuelans: principes Zabulon, principes Nepthalim. ex his enim, ut euangelia declarant, apostolorum est coepta. delectio, hos principes eorum, qui in ecclesiis congregarentur, ostendens. nam cum ex omnibus tribubus singulis quibusque populis secundum legem sint principes instituti. nunc tamen, ubi euangelicae dispensationis principes declarabantur, earum tantum tribuum, ex quibus uocandi essent, commemorata sunt nomina. orta enim in finibus Zabulon et Nepthalim luce magna post umbram mortis piscatores ex his sunt hominum constituti. solum ergo id sub prophetiae significatione ex illa principum uniuersitate memoratum est, quod ad euangelii confirmationem ipsis rerum effectibus et apostolorum electione esset explendum.
But since what had been prefigured in Pharaoh and in Israel was perfected in the overthrow of the devil and his followers and in the salvation of all peoples, the prophet exhorts us not to the confession of the synagogue but to the blessing of the church, so as to strengthen those to whom the ways of God and king in the holy one had been seen, saying: “In the churches bless the Lord from the fountains of Israel,” recalling, that is, that the teaching of the church flowed down from the beginnings of the law and the foreshadowing of its deeds. And lest the churches as they blessed should have any doubt who would be the greatest preacher of the gospel hope, he shows it, saying: “There is Benjamin the younger in fear”: Benjamin the younger, that is, who would remain in fear among the fountains of the church. For after the shock of fear, Paul from the tribe of Benjamin was chosen for the gospel of Christ, dividing at evening for salvation the flesh devoured in the morning. He shows the other princes of Judah too, so that they may not be unknown, revealing those who were to be chosen by him who, from the stock of Judah, was to be the expectation of the nations: “the princes of Zebulun, the princes of Naphtali.” For from these, as the Gospels declare, the choosing of the apostles began, and he shows them as princes of those who would be gathered in the churches. For although according to the law princes were established for each of the peoples from all the tribes, yet now, where the princes of the gospel dispensation were being declared, only the names of the tribes from which they were to be called were mentioned. For when a great light arose in the territories of Zebulun and Naphtali after the shadow of death, fishers of men were appointed from them. Only that, then, was mentioned under the meaning of the prophecy from that whole number of princes which was to be fulfilled, for the confirmation of the gospel, by the very events and by the choosing of the apostles.
67.29CSEL 22:304–306
Et quia tantae expectationis spe detinentur — quia non ambiguum est omnes sanctos et prophetas caelesti desiderio euangelicae beatitudinis tempus optasse, domino dicente: amen dico uobis, quia multi prophetae et sancti cupierunt uidere, quae uos uidetis, et audire, quae auditis — consummari id, quod tantopere concupiscit, precatur dicens: manda, deus, uirtuti tuae, confirma, deus, quod operatus es in nobis. a templo tuo in Hierusalem tibi adferent reges munera. distinguit intellegentiae significationem, ne quid confusum ambiguumque subrepat in eo, quod ait: manda deus uirtuti tuae; quod utique contra humanum sensum et usum naturalis consuetudinis est locutus. mandare enim quisquam uirtuti suae aliquid non uidetur, quia per eam internae potestatis insit effectus; et cum omnia uirtute fiant, non existimatur uirtuti ipsi aliquid mandari solere faciendum. sed enim dei uirtus deique sapientia est dominus Iesus Christus, qui et ponendae animae ac resumendae mandatum accepit a patre. idcirco non contra intellegentiae communis sensum dictum uidetur, quod tamen prophetica; scientiae proprietate memoratum est, ut uirtuti suae mandaret deus, unigenito scilicet deo, qui et dei uirtus est. dehinc quia rerum subitarum in deo non cadit noua repensque molitio, cuius scientiam non subterfugiant quae gerenda sunt, quia natura eius uniuersa, quae erunt, uirtutis suae potestate conplexa est, id nunc confirmari propheta postulat, quod iam sit idem deus operatus in nobis, secundum illud apostoli: benedictus deus pater domini nostri Iesu Christi, qui benedixit nos in omni spiritali benedictione in caelestibus: in quo et elegit nos ante mundi constitutionem, uti essemus sancti et inmaculati in ipso. deus itaque, qui secundum prophetam fecit, quae uentura sunt, ea, quae iam ante constitutionem mundi per definitionem gerendorum operatus in nobis est, confirmauit in domino.
And since they are held by the hope of so great an expectation (for there is no doubt that all the saints and prophets longed with heavenly desire for the time of gospel blessedness, as the Lord says: “Truly I tell you that many prophets and saints desired to see what you see, and to hear what you hear”), he prays that what he so greatly desires may be fulfilled, saying: “Command, O God, your power; confirm, O God, what you have worked in us. From your temple in Jerusalem kings will bring gifts to you.” He marks out the meaning to be understood, so that nothing confused or ambiguous may creep in, in his saying “Command, O God, your power”; which he certainly said against human sense and the usage of natural custom. For no one seems to command anything to his own power, since through it the effect of inner might is present; and since all things are done by power, it is not thought that anything is usually commanded to power itself to be done. But the power of God and the wisdom of God is the Lord Jesus Christ, who also received from the Father the command to lay down his life and take it up again. Therefore it does not seem to be said against the sense of common understanding, though it was spoken with the proper character of prophetic knowledge, that God should command his power, namely the only-begotten God, who is also the power of God. Next, since no new and sudden undertaking of unexpected things befalls God, whose knowledge things to be done do not escape, since his nature has embraced all things that will be by the might of his power, the prophet now asks that what the same God has already worked in us be confirmed, according to the apostle’s saying: “Blessed be God the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places; in whom also he chose us before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and spotless in him.” God, then, who according to the prophet made the things that are to come, confirmed in the Lord what he had already worked in us before the foundation of the world by determining what was to be done.
67.30CSEL 22:306
Et quid illud sit, mox continuat ordo dictorum: a templo tuo in Hierusalem tibi adferent reges munera. templum in Hierusalem est, in quo hostiarum legitima offerebantur; nunc autem a templo in Hierusalem a regibus sunt munera adferenda. quod utique contra locorum significationem rationemque gestorum est, ut illinc, quo inferri magis oporteret, id est de templo, offerenda sint munera. sed quia est caelestis illa nobis mater Hierusalem et primitiuorum conscriptorum et frequentantium coetus, omnisque in Christo renatus dei templum est, maxime in quo non mors magis sit regnatura. sed uita, et qui ipse rex sit eius, cuius seruus fuerat ante, peccati, hostiam se ipsum uiuam et rationabilem et placentem deo offerens: tum ergo ab hoc templo, id est ab hac sancta corporis sui habitatione, in illo conuentu angelorum frequentantium, id est in illa caelesti Hierusalem, si qui reges sint, id est qui peccato ultra non seruiant, offerent se ipsos deo munus.
And what that is, the order of the sayings goes on at once: “From your temple in Jerusalem kings will bring gifts to you.” The temple in Jerusalem is where the lawful sacrifices were offered; but now gifts are to be brought by kings from the temple in Jerusalem. This is certainly against the meaning of places and the reason of things done, that gifts should be offered from the place into which they ought rather to be brought, that is, from the temple. But since that heavenly Jerusalem is our mother, and the assembly of the firstborn enrolled and of those gathered, and everyone reborn in Christ is a temple of God, especially one in whom death will no longer reign but life, and who is himself king over that of which he had formerly been the slave, sin, offering himself as a living, reasonable sacrifice, pleasing to God: then, from this temple, that is, from this holy dwelling of his body, in that gathering of assembled angels, that is, in that heavenly Jerusalem, any who are kings, that is, who no longer serve sin, will offer themselves to God as a gift.
67.31CSEL 22:306–307
Quod quia carnalis Israhel, dum sibi tantum peculiarem dei misericordiam usurpat, uidetur tamquam soli ei sit proprium defendere, mox propheta subiecit: increpa feras siluae, concilium taurorum inter uaccas populorum; ut non excludantur hi, qui probati sunt argento: dissipa gentes, bellum quae uolunt. uaccas in Samaria adoratas esse, cognitio ex libris est. principes uero populi istius iam non populi, sed gregum duces esse, propheticus sermo est, cum dicitur ex domini persona: tauri pingues obsederunt me. feras autem siluae nequitiarum spiritalium supra uerticem capilli in peccatis suis deambulantium significatio intellegenda est secundum illud: deuastauit eam aper de silua, et singularis ferus depastus est eam. quo in loco ipsius principis mundi, id est satanae, et inmanitas significatur et uirtus. id ergo nunc poscit propheta, ut uel in has feras siluarum uel in hoc concilium taurorum inter populorum increpet uaccas, ne hi, qui probati argento sunt, excludantur. probati autem argento hi sunt, qui secundum argentum defaecati et passionum omnium igne decocti inmaculati et sine terrenae sordis admixtione iam splendent.
Since carnal Israel, claiming God’s mercy as peculiar to itself alone, seems to defend it as if it belonged to it alone, the prophet at once added: “Rebuke the beasts of the forest, the council of bulls among the cows of the peoples, so that those who have been proved like silver may not be shut out; scatter the nations that want war.” That cows were worshiped in Samaria is known from the books. That the princes of this people are now no longer leaders of a people but of herds is the prophetic speech, when it is said in the person of the Lord: “Fat bulls have besieged me.” By the beasts of the forest is to be understood the meaning of the spiritual wickednesses that walk over the crown of the hair in their sins, according to this: “The boar from the forest has laid it waste, and the solitary wild beast has fed upon it,” in which place both the savagery and the strength of the prince of the world himself, that is, Satan, are signified. This, then, the prophet now asks: that he rebuke either these beasts of the forests or this council of bulls among the cows of the peoples, so that those who have been proved like silver may not be shut out. Those proved like silver are those who, purified like silver and refined in the fire of all sufferings, now shine spotless, without admixture of earthly dross.
67.32CSEL 22:307–308
Cum enim propheticus sermo fidem gentium populique huius exacerbantis inprobam uoluntatem saepissime increpet, iamque salus a deo in omnes per omnesque sit cognita idque ex scientia dispositionis dei notum sit, tum impietate populi. exprobrata sancti quique in spem regni caelestis uocantur. non enim Iudaeorum deus tantum est, non et gentium: immo et gentium; unus enim deus est, qui iustificat circumcisionem ex fide et praeputium per fidem. postea ergo quam increpitis his principes Sodomorum et principes Gomorraeorum esse meruerunt, tum ad gentes cognitio dei scientiaque defluxit, et iam non intra errorem neque contradictionem inscitia detinentur. increpitis autem siluarum feris taurorumque conciliis uaccisque populorum eos, qui adhuc perpetuis aduersum gentium spem ac salutem infidelitatis odiis persistunt decertare, condemnat dicens: dissipa gentes, quae bellum uolunt. pacificauit enim omnia dominus in caelo et in terra et secundum apostolum deus in Christo erat mundum reconcilians sibi. earum ergo gentium dissipationem, quae caelestis pacis foedus abnuant magisque dissensionum uolent bella, sub diuersarum tamen gentium congregatione denuntiat.
For since the prophetic speech very often rebukes the faith of the nations and the wicked will of this embittering people, and since salvation from God for all and through all is now known, and this is known from knowledge of God’s plan, then, the impiety of the people having been reproached, all the saints are called into the hope of the heavenly kingdom. For he is not the God of the Jews only, and not of the Gentiles also: yes, of the Gentiles also; for there is one God, who justifies the circumcision by faith and the uncircumcision through faith. After, then, these were rebuked and deserved to be the princes of Sodom and the princes of Gomorrah, the knowledge and understanding of God flowed down to the nations, and they are no longer held by ignorance within error and contradiction. And having rebuked the beasts of the forests, the councils of bulls, and the cows of the peoples, he condemns those who still persist in fighting against the hope and salvation of the nations with perpetual hatred of unbelief, saying: “Scatter the nations that want war.” For the Lord has made peace for all things in heaven and on earth, and according to the apostle God was in Christ reconciling the world to himself. He announces, then, the scattering of those nations that refuse the covenant of heavenly peace and prefer the wars of discord, though under the gathering of various nations.
67.33CSEL 22:308–309
Nam ad conseruationem coniunctionemque totius sensus increpitis taurorum conciliis ferisque siluarum, gentibusque bellum uolentibus dissipatis, ne quid sibi ultra adrogans Israhel impiusque praesumeret, subiecit: uenient legati ex Aegypto. Aethiopia praeueniet manu sua. deo regna terrae: cantate deo, psallite domino. expleta autem haec; eadem sunt uel magis ex oriente uenientibus, uel tunc, cum in apostolos spiritus sanctus diuisi ignis modo uenit. nam illic ad praedicationis euangelicae cognitionem etiam ex Aegypto conuenisse scribuntur, quibus magnitudinem diuini muneris tamquam legatis renuntiantibus Aegyptus prope uniuersa est iam fidelis. Aethiopia uero in eunucho Candaces fidei confessione praeuenit; manu autem sua, dum ipse baptismi gratiam sibi postulat dicens: ecce aqua, quis me prohibet baptizari? sacramentum ipsum baptismi adeo inpatientis desiderii cupiditate praeueniens, ut a diacono ministerium apostolici officii salutis suae cupidus exigeret. et quia exinde per omnes fere gentes praedicatio diuinae cognitionis inluxit — quia et omnia regna dominum Christum deum intellectura licet sero sint, et omnis lingua confitebitur, quia dominus Iesus in gloria dei patris sit — consummationem temporis huius exoptat dicens: deo regna terrae: cantate deo, psallite domino. omnes scilicet ad canendum deo ac psallendum adhortatur, uel quia salute omnium prophetica sollicitudine laetatur, uel regnis omnibus deum cognoscentibus regni caelestis. succedit aeternitas.
For to preserve and join the whole sense, after the councils of bulls and the beasts of the forests were rebuked and the nations that want war were scattered, so that arrogant and impious Israel should presume nothing further for itself, he added: “Envoys will come from Egypt; Ethiopia will be first with her hand; to God the kingdoms of the earth: sing to God, sing psalms to the Lord.” These things were fulfilled either in those who came from the east, or rather at the time when the Holy Spirit came upon the apostles in the manner of divided fire. For there they are written to have gathered even from Egypt to the knowledge of the gospel preaching; and as they reported, like envoys, the greatness of the divine gift, almost all Egypt is now faithful. Ethiopia came first, in the eunuch of Candace, by the confession of faith; and “with her hand,” when he asked for the grace of baptism for himself, saying: “Here is water; who prevents me from being baptized?”, anticipating the very mystery of baptism with such longing of impatient desire that, eager for his salvation, he demanded of a deacon the ministry of the apostolic office. And since from then on the preaching of divine knowledge shone out through almost all nations (since all kingdoms will understand the Lord Christ to be God, though late, and every tongue will confess that the Lord Jesus is in the glory of God the Father), he longs for the completion of this time, saying: “To God the kingdoms of the earth: sing to God, sing psalms to the Lord.” He exhorts all, that is, to sing to God and sing psalms, either because with prophetic concern he rejoices in the salvation of all, or because, when all kingdoms know God, the eternity of the heavenly kingdom follows.
67.34CSEL 22:309
Atque ut in ceteris solet, nunc quoque, cui deo dominoque cantandum psallendumque esset, ostendit dicens: psallite deo, qui ascendit super caelos caeli ad orientem; ecce dabit uocem suam, uocem uirtutis. conpetenter nunc ascendentis super caelum caeli ad orientem dei honor poscitur: ut, quia superius significata humilitas eius fuisset, cum uel super occasum ascendit uel exitum mortis egreditur, nunc, ubi non caelum, sed caelum caeli transgressus esse notescit, diuinitatis ac magnificentiae eius non ignoraretur aeternitas. ad orientem uero idcirco, quia ipse secundum prophetam oriens ex alto sit, ut regressus eo, unde descenderat oriens, nosceretur ipseque sit hominibus in hunc caelestis sedis ascensum rursum auctor oriundi.
And as is usual elsewhere, now too he shows to what God and Lord we must sing and sing psalms, saying: “Sing psalms to God, who ascended above the heavens of heaven toward the east; behold, he will give his voice, a voice of power.” Fittingly, honor is now asked for God who ascends above the heaven of heaven toward the east: so that, since his humility had been signified above, when he either rose above the setting or went out by the issue of death, now, where he is made known to have passed beyond not heaven but the heaven of heaven, the eternity of his divinity and magnificence might not be unknown. “Toward the east,” because he himself, according to the prophet, is the Dayspring from on high, so that he might be known to have returned as the Dayspring to where he had come down from, and that he himself might again be for men the author of rising to this ascent to the heavenly seat.
67.35CSEL 22:309–310
Nam idipsum sequens sermo significat, cum dicitur: ecce dabit uocem suam, uocem uirtutis. in omnibus quidem, quaecumque in corpore manens gessit, uirtutis uocem dedit; cum paralytico dicit: surge et ambula, cum Lazarum uocat e sepulcro, cum Petro ceterisque apostolis ait: quaecumque solueritis super terram, soluta erunt et in caelis; et quaecumque ligaueritis super terram. erunt ligata et in caelis. uox plane est ista uirtutis. humanae infirmitati tantum posse concedere. sed scimus adhuc aliam uocem superesse uirtutis, de qua ipse testatus est dicens: amen amen dico uobis, quoniam uenit hora et nunc est, in qua audient mortui uocem filii dei: et qui audierint, uiuent. numquid alia uox potest maior esse uirtutis, quam dissolutorum corporum puluerem in formam cogere soliditatemque membrorum et uitas rursum in homines animasque reuocare et corruptionem naturae inbecillis naturae caelestis incorruptione mutare? haec humanae spei uera et perfecta constantia est, haec diuinae magnificentiae bonitas absoluta est. ob quod uniuersos ad honorem huius tantae uirtutis hortatur dicens: date honorem deo, ut perceptae inmortalitatis laudem ad honorem eius, qui tanti nobis muneris parens est, referremus.,
For the following words signify this very thing, when it is said: “Behold, he will give his voice, a voice of power.” In all the things he did while remaining in the body he gave a voice of power: when he says to the paralytic, “Rise and walk”; when he calls Lazarus from the tomb; when he says to Peter and the other apostles: “Whatever you loose on earth will be loosed also in heaven; and whatever you bind on earth will be bound also in heaven.” That is plainly a voice of power, to be able to grant so much to human weakness. But we know that yet another voice of power remains, of which he himself testified, saying: “Truly, truly I tell you, the hour is coming and now is when the dead will hear the voice of the Son of God, and those who hear will live.” Can there be any greater voice of power than to gather the dust of dissolved bodies into form and the solidity of limbs, to call lives and souls back into men again, and to change the corruption of a weak nature into the incorruption of a heavenly nature? This is the true and perfect constancy of human hope; this is the complete goodness of divine magnificence. Therefore he exhorts all to honor this great power, saying: “Give honor to God,” so that we may refer the praise of the immortality we receive to the honor of him who is the parent of so great a gift to us.
67.36CSEL 22:310–311
Dehinc, ne quid sibi uel carnalis Israhel uel uniuersitas gentium impiarum ex his pietatis scientiaeque dei meritis praesumeret, a quibus hic honor deo reddendus esset, ostendit dicens: super Israhel magnificentia eius, et uirtus eius in nubibus, super eum scilicet Israhel magnificentiam futuram esse demonstrans, qui iam ex conparatione nubium spiritalis existeret, uel qui secundum apostolum rapi obuiam Christo in nubibus mereretur. et idcirco uirtus eius in nubibus est, quia his, qui ultra terrenam originem mortalemque degentes se in sensum caelestem et uitam, ut ita dicam, aeriam extulissent obuiamque elati in nubibus adstitissent, his esset proprium uirtute dei magnificentiaque laetari. — frequenter autem meminit his ipsis nubibus, tamquam ratione scientiaque perfectis, ne super impiam Israhel uineam pluerent, esse praeceptum: quia indigni sancto eloquio, quos iam spinae et tribuli, id est terrena uitia obsederant, exstitissent. — namque cum omnibus sit ad nouam resurrectionis originem uoce uirtutis utendum, non uniuersis tamen gloriosus idem resurrectionis honor est praeparatus domino dicente: nolite mirari ista, quoniam uenit hora, in qua omnes, qui sunt in monumentis, audient uocem eius: et prodient, qui bona gesserunt, in resurrectionem uitae, qui autem iniqua gesserunt, in resurrectionem iudicii. et idcirco super eum Israhel magnificentia et uirtus dei est, qui esset in nubibus, quia pro discrimine uitae innocentis atque impiae resurrectionis sit aut in uitam aut in iudicium distincta diuersitas.
Next, so that neither carnal Israel nor the whole of the impious nations should presume anything for themselves from these merits of godliness and knowledge of God, he shows by whom this honor is to be rendered to God, saying: “His magnificence is over Israel, and his power in the clouds,” showing, that is, that his magnificence will be over that Israel which would already be spiritual by comparison with the clouds, or which, according to the apostle, would deserve to be caught up to meet Christ in the clouds. And therefore his power is in the clouds, because to those who, living beyond their earthly and mortal origin, had raised themselves to a heavenly mind and to, so to speak, an airy life, and, borne up to meet him, had stood in the clouds, to them it would properly belong to rejoice in the power and magnificence of God. (He often recalls that these very clouds, as perfected in reason and knowledge, were commanded not to rain upon the impious vineyard of Israel, because those whom thorns and thistles, that is, earthly vices, had already beset had proved unworthy of the holy word.) For although the voice of power is to be used for all, for the new origin of the resurrection, yet the same glorious honor of resurrection is not prepared for all, as the Lord says: “Do not marvel at this, for the hour is coming in which all who are in the tombs will hear his voice; and those who have done good will come forth to the resurrection of life, but those who have done evil to the resurrection of judgment.” And therefore the magnificence and power of God is over that Israel which is in the clouds, because, according to the distinction between an innocent and an impious life, there is a distinct difference of resurrection, either to life or to judgment.
67.37CSEL 22:311–313
Deinde id ipsum sequens sermo designat dicens: mirabilis deus in sanctis suis. in eos scilicet mirabilis, quos in uitae resurrectionem excitabit aeternos. mirabilis autem est, cum omnem beneficentiae suae in eos conferat uoluntatem, cum ipsos intra perfectionem caelestis gloriae conlocabit, sicuti ad patrem pro his preca.tus est dicens: pater, uolo ut, ubi ego sum, hi mecum sint; uel illud: ut omnes unum sint, ego in illis et tu in me. mirabilis ergo in sanctis deus est, quos, cum conformes gloriae corporis sui fecerit. per se, qui mediator est, etiam in unitate paternae maiestatis adsumet, dum et in eo per naturam pater est et ille rursum per societatem carnis in nobis est: quos in regnum praeparatum illis ante constitutionem mundi obtinendum locauerit, quibus absorpta morte inmortalem uitam aeternamque reddiderit. non enim iam incrementis corporum escarumque alimentis infirmi. tatumque casibus uitae humanae demutatio laborque tolerabitur, sed aeternitas cunctis, quae naturae suae uirtute ipsa se continens, id est quae se ipsam alat conseruetque, donetur: certique omnes fore se sempiternos non aliunde iam, id est non extrinsecus continentur ad uitam, sed ex deo, per quem resurrexerint. et inmortales maneant et aeterni. et ideo haec humanae spei sacramenta tali confessionis fide propheta conclusit: mirabilis deus in sanctis suis, deus Israhel ipse dabit uirtutem et fortitudinem plebi suae, benedictus est deus. dat itaque uirtutem plebi suae et fortitudinem deus, quae inmortalis effecta intra se uitam uirtutemque contineat despoliatoque corpore superinduta sit honore caelesti, ut omni corruptione et infirmitate depulsa deum aeternitatis suae laude benedicat per unigenitum et primogenitum suum deum ac dominum nostrum Iesum Christum, qui est benedictus in saecula saeculorum. amen.
Then the following words point to this very thing, saying: “God is wonderful in his saints”: wonderful, that is, toward those whom he will raise eternal to the resurrection of life. He is wonderful when he confers on them the whole will of his beneficence, when he places them within the perfection of heavenly glory, as he prayed to the Father for them, saying: “Father, I will that where I am these may be with me”; or that: “that all may be one, I in them and you in me.” God, then, is wonderful in his saints, whom, when he has made them conformed to the glory of his body, he who is the mediator will take up through himself even into the unity of the Father’s majesty, since the Father is in him by nature and he in turn is in us by fellowship of the flesh: whom he will have placed to possess the kingdom prepared for them before the foundation of the world, to whom, death being swallowed up, he will have given immortal and eternal life. For no longer will change and toil be endured by the growth of bodies, the nourishment of food, and the chances of weakness in human life; but eternity will be given to all, which holds itself together by the power of its own nature, that is, which nourishes and preserves itself. And all, sure that they will be everlasting, are no longer held to life from elsewhere, that is, from outside, but from God, through whom they will have risen, and they remain immortal and eternal. And therefore the prophet concluded these mysteries of human hope with such a faith of confession: “God is wonderful in his saints; the God of Israel himself will give power and strength to his people; blessed be God.” God, then, gives power and strength to his people, which, made immortal, holds life and power within itself, and, the body having been stripped, has been clothed over with heavenly honor, so that, all corruption and weakness driven away, it may bless God with the praise of its eternity through his only-begotten and firstborn, our God and Lord Jesus Christ, who is blessed for ever and ever. Amen.
Tractates 68
68.1CSEL 22:313–314
Tertius hic pro his, qui inmutabuntur, est psalmus; qui etsi nihil sub historiae conmemoratione conplexus est, ut in quinquagesimo et nono inesse tractauimus, neque ut in quadragesimo quarto aliquid proprium in superscriptione praetulerit, ubi pro dilecto canticum praenotatur, in eo tamen, quod non illius Dauid, sed illi Dauid psalmus in finem praescribitur, in illum potius Dauid, qui et oriens et iustus et finis est legis, conuenire intellegenda prophetia est. per id enim non ab illo, sed in illo psalmus docetur esse cantatus. in his autem, qui inmutabuntur, euangelicae spei fideles significari docuimus, qui aut ex legis obseruatione aut ex gentili impietate ad cognitionem dei demutati, tamquam renascentes incorruptae aeternitatis candore florerent; quod idipsum psalmi fine tractabitur. non ambigitur autem psalmus ipse sacramentum passionis domini continere. nam praeter Iohannem apostolum, qui in potatione aceti consistere consummationem scripturarum testatus est, tum etiam dictum hoc ab eodem sub apostolorum recordatione praesumptum: zelus domus tuae comedit me adimit ambiguitatem confirmatque omnia ad eum dicta gestaque esse referenda. uniuersarum itaque humanarum passionum sorte perfunctus secundum susceptas infirmitates nostras loquitur; et dolet ipse quidem extra necessitatem et timoris positus et doloris, sed his se tamen, quae suscepit, accommodans; ut qui carnis nostrae homo natus esset, et dolorum nostrorum querellis et infirmitatis precatione loqueretur. coepit itaque ita:
This is the third psalm “for those who will be changed.” Although it contains nothing by way of historical record, as we discussed was present in the fifty-ninth, and although it does not put forward anything peculiar in its title, as the forty-fourth does, where “a song for the beloved” is prefixed, yet, since it is headed not “a psalm of David himself” but “to David himself, to the end,” the prophecy is to be understood as fitting rather that David who is the Dayspring, the Righteous One, and the end of the law. For by this the psalm is taught to have been sung not by him but about him. By “those who will be changed” we taught that the faithful of the gospel hope are signified, who, changed to the knowledge of God either from the observance of the law or from pagan impiety, would flourish, as if reborn, in the brightness of incorrupt eternity; and this will be treated at the end of the psalm. There is no doubt that the psalm contains the mystery of the Lord’s passion. For besides the apostle John, who testified that the fulfillment of the Scriptures consisted in the drinking of the vinegar, this saying too, taken up by the same in the apostles’ remembrance, “Zeal for your house has eaten me,” removes all doubt and confirms that everything said and done in it is to be referred to him. Having gone through the lot of all human sufferings, then, he speaks according to the weaknesses of ours that he took up; and he himself grieves, though placed beyond the necessity of fear and pain, yet adapting himself to the things he took up, so that he who had been born a man of our flesh might speak both with the complaints of our pains and with the prayer of weakness. So he began thus:
68.2CSEL 22:314–315
Salua me, deus, quoniam intrauerunt aquae usque ad animam meam. infixus sum in limum profundi, et non est substantia. uiuendi omnibus finem mors in cunctos constituta praescribit. et quid sibi nunc oratio ista uult, quae se saluari deprecatur, cum lex mortis in omnes sit constituta? dehinc nunc orandae salutis haec causa est, quia intrauerunt aquae usque ad animam; introeundi autem aquis ad animam hinc facultas sit, quod infixus sit in limum profundi; defixi uero in limo profundi nulla substantia sit. ergo quia nemo nisi quod sperat precatur — sperat autem nemo se non mori — talis haec eius merito oratio est, qui, moriturus licet, morte non erat obtinendus. adsumpta ergo infirmitas habuit officium deprecandae salutis, diuinitatis uero conscientia spem tenuit salutis in morte sperandae. saluari se ergo orat, qui et dixerit: deus, deus meus, quare me dereliquisti?
“Save me, O God, for the waters have come in even to my soul. I am stuck fast in the mire of the deep, and there is no standing.” Death, appointed for all, prescribes an end of living for everyone. What, then, does this prayer mean, which begs to be saved, when the law of death has been appointed for all? Next, the reason for praying for salvation now is that the waters have come in to the soul; and the waters are able to come in to the soul because he is stuck fast in the mire of the deep; and one fixed in the mire of the deep has no standing. So, since no one prays except for what he hopes, and no one hopes not to die, this prayer rightly belongs to him who, though he was going to die, was not to be held by death. The weakness he assumed, then, had the task of praying for salvation, while the consciousness of divinity held the hope of salvation to be hoped for in death. He prays, then, to be saved, he who also said: “My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?”
68.3CSEL 22:315
Introeuntibus enim aquis usque ad animam subiectus morti crucis fiebat, cum passionum uniuersarum impetus usque ad mortem animae perrumperet. in aquis autem insectationes populi motusque gentium significari solere non dubium est, cum dicitur: torrentem pertransiuit anima mea, uel illud: et pertransiuit anima mea aquam inmensam. sunt et aquae harenosam domum subluentes eamque in casum ruinamque pellentes. hae ergo nunc aquae usque ad animam intrantes ad precem eum orandae salutis coegerunt.
For as the waters came in to the soul, he was being subjected to the death of the cross, when the onrush of all sufferings broke through even to the death of the soul. There is no doubt that by waters the persecutions of the people and the movements of the nations are usually signified, when it is said: “My soul has passed through a torrent,” or: “And my soul has passed through an immense water.” There are also waters that wash under the house built on sand and drive it to its fall and ruin. These waters, then, now coming in to the soul, compelled him to the prayer of asking for salvation.
68.4CSEL 22:315–316
Verum ineuntium harum passionum non aliunde quam ex adsumptione carnis et uirtus est et potestas. non enim incidere in deum hic infirmitatum nostrarum terror ualebat, aut exerere se nisi in carne corporis nostri, tamquam in subiacente materie, potuerant passiones. porro autem haurienda fuit natura caelestis, ut exinaniens se ex dei forma in formam serui hominisque decideret. et ideo usque ad animam aquae penetrant, quia substantia ei non sit infixo in limo profundi. non utique substantia ea non erat, quae adsumpta habebatur, sed quae se ipsam inaniens hauserat. nullo autem modo se caruit, qui se ipsum exinaniuit euacuans; nec tamen idipsum uidebatur exstare, quod iam in aliud se euacuando concesserat. non est ergo substantia per id, quod infixus est in limo profundi. primus enim homo de limo terrae; et secundus Adam in huius limi profundum de caelis descendens se ipsum tamquam ex alto ueniens defixit. euacuans ergo se, quippe cui substantia non erat, non iam usque ad carnis, uerum etiam usque ad mortis profunda descendit, et omnis in eum terror desseuientis in nos tempestatis incubuit. cum enim se contra naturae caelestis terrenaeque diuersitatem in hunc limum potestatis suae uirtute defixit — quia ea, quae natura dissident ad quandam conexionis suae soliditatem non generis ipsius propinquitate conueniunt, sed potiore ui tamquam confixa sociantur — tunc et pati coepit et mori posse, per occasum mortis in inferna descendens.
But the force and power of these sufferings that came in come from nowhere else than from the assumption of flesh. For this terror of our weaknesses could not fall upon God, nor could the sufferings show themselves except in the flesh of our body, as in an underlying material. Moreover, the heavenly nature had to be drained, so that, emptying himself, he might fall from the form of God into the form of a servant and of a man. And therefore the waters penetrate to the soul, because there is no standing (substantia) for him, fixed in the mire of the deep. Certainly it was not that substance which was held as assumed, but that which, emptying itself, it had drained. Yet he who emptied himself, making himself void, was in no way without himself; and yet that very thing did not seem to stand forth which had already yielded itself by emptying into something else. There is no standing, then, because he is fixed in the mire of the deep. For the first man was from the mire of the earth; and the second Adam, descending from heaven into the depth of this mire, fixed himself in it as one coming from on high. Emptying himself, then, since he had no standing, he descended not only to the depths of the flesh but even to the depths of death, and the whole terror of the storm raging against us fell upon him. For when, against the difference between the heavenly and earthly natures, he fixed himself in this mire by the force of his power (since things that differ in nature come together into a kind of firm connection not by the nearness of their kind but are joined, as if fastened together, by a stronger force), then he began both to suffer and to be able to die, descending through the setting of death into the underworld.
68.5CSEL 22:316–317
Sequitur enim: ueni in altitudinem maris, et tempestas demersit me. imitator ille et dominicae mortis et temporis Ionas mari mersus cetoque susceptus non tam in mari se, quam in inferno positum testatur: clamaui in pressura mea ad deum meum, et exaudiuit de uentre inferorum clamoris mei. et quamuis eum cetus ad speciem infernae mortis hausisset, ait: introiuit caput meum in scissuras petrarum, descendi in terram, cuius serae tenaces et aeternae. sancto etiam Iob post illum uniuersarum passionum gloriosissimum bellum, cum dignus iam esset eloquio diuino scientiaque naturae, post confracti intra se maris portas rugientesque eius in matris suae uentre terrores, rursum quid etiam in mari significaretur, dominus reuelauit dicens: uenisti autem super fontes abyssi, aut in uestigiis maris ambulasti? aperiuntur autem tibi prae timore portae mortis, in uestigiis utique maris, tamquam in profundo uel altitudine maris, portas mortis esse significans. nam cum profunda maris inferiora sint terrae, necesse est in profundo maris, id est in inferioribus, sedem mortis ostendi. ueniens ergo in hoc profundum maris tempestate demersus est, cuius in anteriore psalmo ita meminit dicens: omnia excelsa tua et fluctus tui super me transierunt. sed et ille, ut dixi, dominicae mortis imitator, quem ex tenacibus aeternisque terrae seris inmanissimus ille maris istius cetus euomuit, haud dissimilia conquestus est: omnes suspensiones tuae et fluctus tui super me transiebant. usque ad mortis igitur ueniens profundum mortis ipsius tempestate demersus est aduersarumque uirtutum depressus procellis est.
For there follows: “I came into the depth of the sea, and the storm overwhelmed me.” Jonah, the imitator of the Lord’s death and of its time, plunged into the sea and taken up by the whale, testifies that he was set not so much in the sea as in the underworld: “I cried in my distress to my God, and he heard me out of the belly of the underworld, at my cry.” And although the whale had swallowed him as an image of death in the underworld, he says: “My head went into the clefts of the rocks; I went down into the earth, whose bars are tenacious and eternal.” To holy Job also, after that most glorious war of all sufferings, when he was now worthy of divine speech and of knowledge of nature, after the gates of the sea broken within itself and its roaring terrors in its mother’s womb, the Lord revealed again what was also signified by the sea, saying: “Have you come upon the springs of the abyss, or walked in the tracks of the sea? Do the gates of death open to you in fear?”, signifying that the gates of death are in the tracks of the sea, as in its depth or height. For since the depths of the sea are lower than the earth, the seat of death must be shown to be in the depth of the sea, that is, in the lower regions. Coming, then, into this depth of the sea, he was overwhelmed by the storm, which he recalls in an earlier psalm thus: “All your heights and your waves have passed over me.” And he too, as I said, the imitator of the Lord’s death, whom that most monstrous whale of this sea vomited out from the tenacious and eternal bars of the earth, lamented in much the same way: “All your billows and your waves passed over me.” Coming, then, to the depth of death, he was overwhelmed by the storm of death itself and pressed down by the tempests of the hostile powers.
68.6CSEL 22:317–318
Non tamen tacitus eorum, qui se ipsos diabolo praebituri erant uelut ministerii arma peccato — quippe qui et nonnumquam consilia initae mortis suae exprobrauerit et stans in templo saepe clamauerit et eleuatis ad deum frequenter oculis intenderit, ut ad unumquodque diuinitatis suae opus maximum adspectarent — intellegitur ad patrem; ob quod sequitur: laboraui clamans, raucae factae sunt fauces meae: defecerunt oculi mei, dum spero ad deum meum. infirmitates nostras suscipiens portansque peccata usu et consuetudine humanae defatigationis locutus est, namque qui se somno et lassitudini saepe commiserit etiam usque ad sitis et esuritionis necessitatem. fauces itaque eius raucae sunt oculique defecti. causam uero maxime clamoris et intentionis oculorum hanc esse docuit, quia speraret in deum, uel cum clamat dicens: qui credit in me, non in me credit, sed in eum, qui me misit, uel cum clamaturus Lazarum uoce magna eleuatis sursum oculis ait: pater, gratias tibi ago, quoniam audisti me.
Yet he was not silent toward the Father about those who were going to offer themselves to the devil as instruments of service to sin (for he sometimes reproached them with the plans they had made for his death, often cried out standing in the temple, and frequently lifted his eyes to God, so that they might look to him at each greatest work of his divinity); and so there follows: “I have labored crying out; my throat has become hoarse; my eyes have failed while I hope in my God.” Taking up our weaknesses and bearing our sins, he spoke in the usage and custom of human weariness; for he often gave himself to sleep and fatigue, even to the necessity of thirst and hunger. So his throat was hoarse and his eyes failed. He taught that the chief cause of his crying out and of the straining of his eyes was that he hoped in God: either when he cries out, saying: “He who believes in me does not believe in me but in him who sent me,” or when, about to call Lazarus with a loud voice, with his eyes lifted up he says: “Father, I thank you that you have heard me.”
68.7CSEL 22:318–319
Sed illo uel paterni nominis magnificentiam testante uel humanae salutis opus moliente odia in eum multiplicantur in cassum. sequitur enim: multiplicati sunt super capillos capitis mei, qui oderunt me gratis. conualuerunt, qui persecuntur me inimici mei iniuste; quae non rapui, tunc exsoluere repetebar. numerus odientium ultra capillos capitis est multiplex, siue ob impiorum copiosam multitudinem, siue quia indigni sint dei cura — nam apostolorum capillos, quia tanta eorum deo cura est, scimus esse numeratos — siue quia infidelium numerus ultra numerum sit fidelium. nam cum decus capitis in capillis sit, et ecclesiae. quae corpus est Christi, in apostolorum decore omnis ornatus sit, super hoc capitis sui decus odientium est multitudo. oderunt autem eum gratis, id est causam odii non habentes. et conualescentes inimici iniuste sunt persecuti. non enim peccatum egerat, nec dolum habuerat; et ideo, quae non rapuerat, tunc repetebatur exsoluere. cum enim debitor mortis peccatique non esset, tamquam peccati et mortis debitor tenebatur, ab his scilicet, qui in eo peccati legem, quae in membris nostris est, exserebant. de peccato enim condemnauit peccatum in carne.
But while he was either bearing witness to the magnificence of the Father’s name or carrying out the work of human salvation, hatreds against him multiplied without cause. For there follows: “Those who hate me without cause are multiplied above the hairs of my head. My enemies who persecute me unjustly have grown strong; then I was made to pay back what I did not steal.” The number of those who hate him is greater than the hairs of his head: either because of the abundant multitude of the impious, or because they are unworthy of God’s care (for we know that the apostles’ hairs are numbered, so great is God’s care for them), or because the number of unbelievers exceeds the number of the faithful. For since the beauty of the head lies in its hair, and the whole adornment of the church, which is the body of Christ, lies in the beauty of the apostles, the multitude of those who hate is above this beauty of his head. They hated him without cause, that is, having no reason for hatred. And his enemies, growing strong, persecuted him unjustly. For he had committed no sin, nor had he any deceit; and therefore he was made to pay back what he had not stolen. For though he was not a debtor of death and sin, he was held as a debtor of sin and death, by those, namely, who exercised in him the law of sin that is in our members. For from sin he condemned sin in the flesh.
68.8CSEL 22:319–320
In quo quia magnum diuinae sapientiae consilium explebat, crucisque mors in deo stultitia gentibus uidebatur, magnaque in eo caelestis terrenaeque spei expectatio inerat, subiecit: deus, tu scis insipientiam meam, et delicta mea a te non sunt abscondita. non confundantur in me, qui expectant te, domine uirtutum: non uereantur super me, qui quaerunt te, deus Israhel. insipientiae suae deus conscius est, et delicta sua abscondita ab eo non sunt: poenas scilicet insipientiae et delictorum, quas non rapuerat, repetebatur exsoluere. usque ad crucis autem stultitiam — id est, quia stultitia sit gentibus peccata nostra sic suscipiens — ut peccator et stultus gratis iniusteque uexatur. sed quia stultitiam atque delicta propter sapientiam nostram uitamque susceperat, ut et principem saeculi iudicaret et de peccato condemnaret in carne peccatum — cum quando in se, in carne scilicet corporis sui, in qua nihil inueniri poterat peccati, secundum quod ait: ecce ueniet princeps mundi et non inueniet in me quicquam, ueniens hic mundi princeps nihilque inueniens peccati tamen poenam, id est ius mortis, exeruit, per quod humanae mortis auctor, quia in auctorem uitae peccati nescium mortem molitus sit, iudicatur; haec sanctorum expectatio fuit, ut caro omnis redimeretur in Christo, ut in eo aeternae resurrectionis primitiae exsisterent - non confundi in se eos rogat, qui expectent dominum, neque quaerentes deum Israhel super se uereri ac pudere; quia suscipiendae ab eo carnis tempus desideratum sit secundum illud: multi prophetae et iusti cupierunt uidere, quae uos uidetis, et audire, quae auditis. ne quid ergo in se inbecillum infirmumque maneat deprecatur, ne spem expectantium infirmitas corporis carnisque confundat. per eum enim et in eo expectatio nobis omnis ad deum est. ueniens ergo in corpus, ne in se sanctorum spes confundatur, orat.
Since in this he was fulfilling a great plan of divine wisdom, and the death of the cross in God seemed folly to the Gentiles, and great expectation of heavenly and earthly hope was present in him, he added: “O God, you know my foolishness, and my sins are not hidden from you. Let not those who wait for you, Lord of powers, be put to shame in me; let not those who seek you, God of Israel, be confounded over me.” God is aware of his foolishness, and his sins are not hidden from him: that is, the penalties of foolishness and sins, which he had not stolen, he was made to pay. Even to the folly of the cross (that is, because it is folly to the Gentiles that he should take up our sins in this way) he is harassed without cause and unjustly as a sinner and a fool. But since he had taken up folly and sins for the sake of our wisdom and life, so as both to judge the prince of the world and to condemn sin in the flesh from sin (since in himself, that is, in the flesh of his body, in which no sin could be found, according to his saying, “Behold, the prince of the world will come and will find nothing in me,” this prince of the world, coming and finding no sin, nevertheless exercised the penalty, that is, the right of death, by which the author of human death is judged, because he contrived death against the author of life, who knew no sin); this was the expectation of the saints, that all flesh might be redeemed in Christ, that in him the firstfruits of eternal resurrection might stand forth. He asks that those who wait for the Lord may not be put to shame in him, nor those who seek the God of Israel be afraid and ashamed over him; because the time of his taking flesh was longed for, according to this: “Many prophets and righteous men desired to see what you see, and to hear what you hear.” He prays, then, that nothing weak and infirm may remain in him, lest the weakness of body and flesh confound the hope of those who wait. For through him and in him is all our expectation toward God. Coming into the body, then, he prays that the hope of the saints may not be confounded in him.
68.9CSEL 22:320–321
Quod autem infirmitates nostras ad salutem generis humani ex paterna uoluntate susceperit, quia non uoluntatem suam facturus uenerit, sed uoluntatem eius, qui se miserit, patris, nunc quoque per subiecta declarat: quoniam propter te sustinui inproperium, operuit reuerentia faciem meam. exter factus sum fratribus meis et hospes filiis matris meae: quoniam zelus domus tuae comedit me. non fuit ergo in unigenito deo naturalis infirmitas, sed adsumpta, quia propter eum haec inproperia susceperit passionum. quamquam ne in naturis quidem hominum inest necessitas aliqua peccati; sed ex adpetitu uoluntatis oblectationeque uitiorum peccati usus adripitur. et ideo dominus non se rapuisse, quae ut solueret repetebatur, ostendit; quia ea, quae contra naturam sint desiderata, rapiantur, soluturis omnibus quadrantem nouissimum talium debitorum: et ob hoc orationis dominicae praescripto remitti nobis debita deprecamur. sustinuit ergo inproperium propter deum, dum alienum a natura sua corpus adsumit, dum secundum apostolum peccati nescium pater facit esse peccatum, dum fit oboediens usque ad mortem crucis, dum ipsi exprobratur, quod ceteros saluans se ipse non saluet, dum contumelias sputorum alaparumque perpetitur.
That he took up our weaknesses for the salvation of the human race by the Father’s will, since he came to do not his own will but the will of the Father who sent him, he now also declares through what follows: “For your sake I have borne reproach; shame has covered my face. I have become a stranger to my brothers and a foreigner to my mother’s sons; for zeal for your house has eaten me.” There was no natural weakness, then, in the only-begotten God, but an assumed one, because for God’s sake he took up these reproaches of sufferings. And yet not even in the nature of men is there any necessity of sin; rather the practice of sin is seized from the appetite of the will and delight in vices. And therefore the Lord shows that he had not stolen what he was made to pay; because things desired against nature are stolen, and all will pay the last penny of such debts; and for this reason, by the rule of the Lord’s Prayer, we pray that our debts be forgiven us. He bore reproach, then, for God’s sake, when he takes up a body foreign to his nature, when, according to the apostle, the Father makes him who knew no sin to be sin, when he becomes obedient even to the death of the cross, when he is reproached that, saving others, he does not save himself, when he suffers the insults of spitting and blows.
68.10CSEL 22:321
Hoc igitur pudore coopertus ob deum fit alienus a fratribus suis et filiis matris suae hospes efficitur, a uitiis scilicet eorum, qui sibi secundum carnem consanguinei habebantur, alienus, dum nummulariorum mensas templum ingressus euertit, dum nundinas ouium ac boum prohibet, dum uendentibus columbas, cur domum patris sui domum fecerint negotiationis, exprobrat. zelo enim domus dei peruasus haec egit. est autem haec amoris pii indignatio, ut eorum, quos diligimus, contumeliis tamquam zelo efferuescente moueamur. hoc enim pollutae domus zelo, ut euangelium — sicut superius docui — testatum est, turbam omnem ementium ac uendentium templum ingressus eiecit. zelo autem dei etiam usque ad mortis seueritatem et finem placuisse, laudabile est.
Covered with this shame for God’s sake, then, he becomes a stranger to his brothers and is made a foreigner to his mother’s sons: a stranger, that is, to the vices of those who were held to be his kin according to the flesh, when, entering the temple, he overturned the tables of the money-changers, forbade the market of sheep and oxen, and reproached those who sold doves for having made his Father’s house a house of trade. For he did these things seized by zeal for God’s house. This is the indignation of devoted love, that we are moved by insults to those we love as by a boiling zeal. For by this zeal for the polluted house, as the Gospel testifies (as I showed above), he entered the temple and drove out the whole crowd of buyers and sellers. And it is praiseworthy that zeal for God was pleasing even to the severity and end of death.
68.11CSEL 22:321–322
Per hanc igitur exprobratarum his cupiditatum indignationem omnium in eum maledictorum congesta conuicia sunt. quacumque autem in impios dirigi solent, haec in eum opprobria sunt relata, cum blasphemus, cum Samaritanus, cum Beelzebub, cum daemonium habens dicitur. id enim subiacet: et opprobria exprobrantium te ceciderunt super me. blasphemiae opprobrium ei potius, qui deo contumeliam exprobret, ingeritur; sicuti daemonii infamia ei magis, qui a deo sit alienus, est propria. quae cum omnia ei exprobrata sunt propter domus dei zelum, eorum, qui deum exprobrant. super eum opprobria congeruntur. et huius dicti ad Romanos apostolus scribens sub huius significationis meminit intellegentia.
Through this indignation at the greed he reproached in them, then, the abuse of all curses was heaped upon him. Whatever reproaches are usually directed at the impious were brought against him, when he is called a blasphemer, a Samaritan, Beelzebub, one who has a demon. For this is what follows: “And the reproaches of those who reproached you fell upon me.” The reproach of blasphemy is rather thrust upon one who casts insult upon God, just as the infamy of a demon belongs more properly to one who is estranged from God. Since all these were cast at him because of zeal for God’s house, the reproaches of those who reproach God are heaped on him. And the apostle, writing to the Romans, recalls this saying with this sense of meaning.
68.12CSEL 22:322–323
Ipsa etiam ieiunii continentia recidit in opprobrium, cum a diabolo temptatur, cum in templi pinna locatur, cum supra montem fertur, cum postremo ad adorandum satanam totius mundi ambitione temptatur. flet interdum et ingemescit et tristis est, et id ipsum ad infirmitatis tribuitur exemplum. omni denique generi hominum et obtrectatio efficitur et canticum. ipsi enim, qui in portis orandi uictus causa sedeant, oblocuntur et detrahunt, et in eo ebrii psallunt. haec autem omnia uel secundum gestorum fidem uel secundum humanae consuetudinis modum in se ita gesta esse conqueritur: et operui in ieiunio animam meam, et factum est mihi in obprobrium. et posui uestimentum meum saccum, et factus sum illis in parabolam. aduersum me detrahebant, qui sedebant in porta, et in me psallebant, qui bibebant uinum. fuit itaque ieiunium ei in obprobrium, quia per esuriendi obprobrium usque ad adorandi satanae contumeliam temptatus est. uestis autem de sacco habitus est luctus. luctus uero omnis adfectus in fletu est. et cum Lazarum excitaturus inlacrimat, infidelitatem humani generis lugebat: in habitu enim luctus flendi significatur adfectus. quod autem non Lazarum, cuius et morte laetatur, quem et ex mortuis excitaturus erat, fleuerit, omnis ipse euangelii sermo declarat. sed cum resurrectionis fidem nullam futuram in ipso resurrectionis opere fleuisset, fletus eius in parabolam profecit, ut et tum docimentum amoris sui in Lazarum flendo dictus sit praebuisse et a plerisque hodie, quia fleuerit, arguatur o infirmus. in ebriis autem psallentibus et his, qui in porta sederent, detrahentibus omnium etiam infirmorum in eum contumeliae per hanc consuetudinem uulgi docentur. adeo autem nullum genus hominum de eo tacuisse manifestum est, ut Cleophas ei, qui tamquam rerum ignarus causam sermonis interrogaret, respondisse ita scribatur: tu solus peregrinus es in Hierusalem et non cognouisti, quae facta sunt in ea in diebus his? stupor enim est de ignoratione unius in cognitione uniuersorum.
Even the self-denial of fasting turned into reproach, when he is tempted by the devil, when he is set on the pinnacle of the temple, when he is carried up on a mountain, when finally he is tempted to worship Satan by the ambition of ruling the whole world. At times he weeps, groans, and is sad, and this very thing is attributed to him as an example of weakness. Finally, he becomes both the object of disparagement and a song to every kind of men. For even those who sit at the gates begging for their living abuse and disparage him, and drunkards sing psalms about him. He laments that all these things were done to him, either according to the truth of events or after the manner of human custom: “And I covered my soul with fasting, and it became a reproach to me. I made sackcloth my garment, and I became a byword to them. Those who sat in the gate spoke against me, and those who drank wine sang psalms about me.” Fasting, then, was a reproach to him, because through the reproach of hunger he was tempted even to the insult of worshiping Satan. A garment of sackcloth is the dress of mourning, and every feeling of mourning lies in weeping. And when, about to raise Lazarus, he sheds tears, he was mourning the unbelief of the human race; for in the dress of mourning the feeling of weeping is signified. That he did not weep for Lazarus, at whose death he even rejoices and whom he was about to raise from the dead, the whole account of the Gospel declares. But since he wept that there would be no faith in the resurrection even in the very work of resurrection, his weeping became a byword, so that both then he was said to have given proof of his love for Lazarus by weeping, and by many today he is charged with being weak because he wept. In the drunkards who sing psalms and those who sit in the gate and disparage him, the insults against him even of all the weak are taught through this custom of the common people. So clear is it that no kind of men was silent about him that Cleopas is written to have answered him, when, as if ignorant of the matter, he asked the reason for their conversation: “Are you the only stranger in Jerusalem who has not known the things that have happened there in these days?” For there is astonishment at one man’s ignorance amid everyone’s knowledge.
68.13CSEL 22:323–324
Sed inter has omnium de se et obtrectationes et contumelias humanae salutis sacramenta peragebat; et salutem a deo homini, quem adsumpserat, deprecatur. id enim sequitur: ego uero oratione mea ad te, domine; tempus beneplaciti, deus! in multitudine misericordiae tuae exaudi me, in ueritate salutis meae. eripe me de luto, uti non haeream, et libera ex odientibus me et de profundo aquarum. non me demergat tempestas aquae, neque absorbeat me profundum, neque contineat puteus super me os suum. ceteris in contumelias et opprobria eius intentis ipse oratione sua totus ad deum est: susceptas quidem infirmitates nostras in se habens, sed in his, quibus adficitur, caelestis erga nos misericordiae munus exsequitur; neque inuitus haec sumens in multitudine misericordiae beneplacitum deo esse tempus ostendit in hoc ergo beneplacito tempore rogat, quia non ignorat hanc patris de se prophetiam etiam ab apostolo Paulo recognitam: tempore accepto exaudiui te.
But amid these disparagements and insults of all against him, he was carrying out the mysteries of human salvation; and he prays to God for salvation for the man he had taken up. For there follows: “But I, with my prayer to you, O Lord: a time of good pleasure, O God! In the greatness of your mercy hear me, in the truth of my salvation. Rescue me from the mud, that I may not stick fast, and free me from those who hate me and from the depth of waters. Let not the storm of water sink me, nor the deep swallow me up, nor the pit shut its mouth over me.” While the others are intent on insults and reproaches against him, he himself is wholly turned to God in his prayer: having in himself the weaknesses of ours that he took up, but in the things by which he is afflicted carrying out the gift of heavenly mercy toward us; and, not taking these things on unwillingly, he shows that in the greatness of mercy it is a time of good pleasure to God. In this time of good pleasure, then, he prays, because he is not ignorant of this prophecy of the Father about himself, recognized also by the apostle Paul: “In an acceptable time I have heard you.”
68.14CSEL 22:324–325
Omnia quidem deo pro magnificentia operum intellegenda sunt placere, quae gesta sunt; et cum in Genesi scribitur: et uidit deus quia bona sunt, uitium nullum in rerum creaturis relinquitur, tametsi quaedam humani ingenii corrupta nequitiis sunt, ut ex remediis uenena, ut ex ferro ensis, ut ex igni conflagratio, ut ex cibis cruditas, ut ebrietas ex uino, ut postremo partes ipsae et membra corporum ad naturales utique usus utilesque formatae uitiorum se ac criminum ministeria praebuerunt; et cum deo cuncta sint placita, beneplacitum tamen tempus hoc est, quo unigenitus deus in sanguine corporis nostri tamquam inimica ac dissidentia reconciliaturus omnia in caelis et in terra deo esset: cum multiformis illa dei sapientia aliis occulta temporibus nullisque principibus ac magistratibus; saeculi cognita ad laudem claritatis dei esset reuelanda, cum coheredes et concorporales et conparticipes Christo gentes fierent, cum in eo omnes aduersae deo uirtutes dehonestarentur, cum mors, postquam in deo esset grassata, desineret, cum lex peccati, quae in carne nostra est, tolleretur, cum reuelationem filiorum dei congemescens omnis creatura speraret, cum in passione unigeniti dei omnium ante constitutionem mundi causarum et originum consummaretur effectus principem saeculi iudicando, hominem ex peccati lege redimendo, creaturis a corruptionis uanitate, cui seruiant, liberandis, nequitiis spiritalibus domini morte damnandis, deo in omnibus et per omnes aeternitatis munere et inmortalitatis nostrae claritate laudando. omnia autem haec uirtus resurrectionis inpleuit, quia per primitias ex mortuis ab hominum genere morte depulsa in auctores mortis aeternae mortis poena decreta est. in se enim ipso principatus et potestates dehonestatas cum fiducia triumphauit.
All things that have been done must indeed be understood to please God on account of the magnificence of his works; and when it is written in Genesis, “And God saw that they were good,” no fault is left in created things, even though some things have been corrupted by the wickedness of human ingenuity: as poisons from remedies, a sword from iron, a conflagration from fire, indigestion from food, drunkenness from wine, and finally the very parts and members of bodies, formed for natural and useful purposes, have offered themselves as the servants of vices and crimes. And though all things are pleasing to God, yet this is the time of good pleasure in which the only-begotten God, in the blood of our body, was to reconcile to God all things in heaven and on earth, as things hostile and at variance: when that manifold wisdom of God, hidden in other times and known to no princes and magistrates of the age, was to be revealed to the praise of God’s glory; when the nations were to become fellow heirs, of the same body, and partakers with Christ; when in him all the powers hostile to God were to be put to shame; when death, after it had raged against God, was to cease; when the law of sin that is in our flesh was to be removed; when all creation, groaning together, was to hope for the revealing of the sons of God; when in the passion of the only-begotten God the effect of all causes and origins from before the foundation of the world was to be fulfilled: by judging the prince of the age, by redeeming man from the law of sin, by freeing creatures from the vanity of corruption which they serve, by condemning the spiritual wickednesses through the Lord’s death, and by praising God in all things and through all by the gift of eternity and the glory of our immortality. All these things the power of the resurrection fulfilled, because, death being driven away from the human race through the firstfruits from the dead, the penalty of eternal death was decreed against the authors of death. For in himself he triumphed confidently over the principalities and powers, putting them to shame.
68.15CSEL 22:325–326
Et ideo post beneplaciti temporis significationem omnis tribuendae uerae salutis oratio est, ut ea ipsa salutis ueritas intellegeretur, quae ex resurrectione speratur. dehinc. qui infixus esset in limo profundi, ut luto non inhaereret, rogat secundum illud: quoniam non derelinques animam meam in infernum, nec dabis sanctum tuum uidere. corruptionem. qui enim terra est, et in terram, ex qua acceptus est. reuertetur, luto et limo, quo infixus est, inhaerebit in naturae suae, id est corporis, originem dissolutus. liberari se etiam ex odientibus se deprecatur et de profundo aquarum, quia usque. ad animam suam — id est insectantium passiones — perruperint. ueniens quoque in altitudinem maris ac tempestate demersus nunc, ne demergatur, orat: ut superius adsumptae infirmitatis nostrae professio sit, cum se demersum esse profitetur, nunc uero consciae in se salutis fiducia est, cum, ne se aquae tempest-as demergat, precatur. nam eiusdem naturae non est et demersam iam esse et, ne demergatur, orare: sed eius, quae per corpus licet mersa non tamen sit detinenda per spiritum. et ideo nunc, ne absorbeatur profundo neue super se puteus os suum claudat, precatur. in puteo enim infernae mortis sedem significari et psalmus alius testis est, cum dicitur: tu uero, domine, deduces eos in puteum interitus, demersum hoc profundumque puteorum inferna terrae significari demonstrans. ne contineat ergo super eum puteus os suum postulat. inpossibile enim est deum uitae portis inferni detineri.
And therefore, after the mention of the time of good pleasure, the whole prayer is for the granting of true salvation, so that the very truth of salvation might be understood as that which is hoped for from the resurrection. Next, he who was fixed in the mire of the deep asks that he may not stick fast in the mud, according to this: “For you will not leave my soul in the underworld, nor give your holy one to see corruption.” For he who is earth, and will return to the earth from which he was taken, will stick fast in the mud and mire in which he is fixed, dissolved into the origin of his nature, that is, of the body. He also prays to be freed from those who hate him and from the depth of the waters, because they had broken through even to his soul, that is, the sufferings inflicted by his persecutors. And having come into the depth of the sea and been overwhelmed by the storm, he now prays that he may not be sunk: so that above there was the profession of our weakness that he took up, when he professes that he was sunk, but now there is the confidence of salvation of which he is conscious in himself, when he prays that the storm of water may not sink him. For it does not belong to the same nature both to have been sunk already and to pray not to be sunk, but to that nature which, though sunk through the body, was not to be held through the spirit. And therefore he now prays that he may not be swallowed by the deep and that the pit may not close its mouth over him. For that the seat of death in the underworld is signified by a pit, another psalm also testifies, when it is said: “But you, O Lord, will bring them down into the pit of destruction,” showing that this sunken depth of pits signifies the lower regions of the earth. He asks, then, that the pit may not close its mouth over him; for it is impossible for the God of life to be held by the gates of the underworld.
68.16CSEL 22:326–327
Ac ne in eo, quod mortem nostrae infirmitatis adsumpsit, secundum humanam necessitatem aliquid ex mortis acerbitate maereret, subiecit: exaudi me, domine, quoniam suauis est mihi misericordia tua: secundum multitudinem misericordiae tuae conspice in me. hoc enim in multitudine misericordiae beneplacitum est tempus, cum in se uniuersorum hominum uitam deus miserans ut miserator' deus uitam esset largiturus ex mortuis. sed qui suauem hanc sibi esse dei misericordiam testabatur, susceptae tamen infirmitatis nostrae sollicitudinem non relaxat dicens: ne auertas faciem tuam a puero tuo: quoniam tribulor, uelociter exaudi me. intende animae meae et libera eam: propter inimicos meos eripe me. omnia ut homo et patitur et loquitur. nam ex susceptione carnis et puer est secundum illud: ecce puer meus, quem elegi, dilectus meus, in quo conplacuit animae meae, et citum auxilium tribulationi suae orat et intendi in animam suam rogat, ut per id, quod in eam intendet deus, digna sit liberari. et haec quidem ut homo noster oboediens usque ad mortem crucis precatur. sed cum eripi se propter inimicos suos rogat, consuetudinem humanae et spei et moris excedit nemo enim saluus alia magis, quam salutis suae causa uult esse; et a malis quis eripi se ob id necesse est, ne malis adficiatur, optabit. at uero nunc eripi se non sua causa, sed propter inimicos suos ex his, quibus adficitur, deposcit, quia hi inimici dehonestandi in se patiente et triumphandi cum fiducia in se ex mortuis resurgente mox essent.
And lest, in having taken the death of our weakness, he should grieve at all from the bitterness of death according to human necessity, he added: “Hear me, O Lord, for your mercy is sweet to me; according to the greatness of your mercy look upon me.” For this is the time of good pleasure in the greatness of mercy, when God, having mercy on the life of all men in himself, was, as the merciful God, to bestow life from the dead. But he who testified that this mercy of God was sweet to him does not relax the anxiety of our weakness that he took up, saying: “Do not turn your face from your servant; for I am in trouble, hear me quickly. Attend to my soul and free it; because of my enemies rescue me.” He suffers and speaks all things as a man. For from his taking of flesh he is also a servant (puer), according to this: “Behold my servant whom I have chosen, my beloved, in whom my soul is well pleased”; and he prays for quick help in his trouble and asks that God attend to his soul, so that, through God’s attending to it, it may be worthy to be freed. These things he prays as our man, obedient even to the death of the cross. But when he asks to be rescued because of his enemies, he goes beyond the custom of human hope and behavior. For no one wishes to be saved for any other reason more than for the sake of his own salvation; and anyone will wish to be rescued from evils so that he may not be afflicted by evils. But now he asks to be rescued from the things that afflict him, not for his own sake but because of his enemies, because these enemies were soon to be put to shame in him as he suffered and triumphed over with confidence in him as he rose from the dead.
68.17CSEL 22:327
Denique nihil se sua causa agere ac pati consequentibus docet dicens: tu enim scis inproperium et confusionem et uerecundiam meam; in conspectu tuo omnes tribulantes me. inproperium expectauit cor meum et miseriam. superior non dispar professio est, cum dicit: deus, tu scis insipientiam meam, et delicta mea a te non sunt absconsa. contra humanae enim opinionis errorem soli deo adsumpta magis haec ab eo infirmitas, quam naturalis esse, erat nota. et quia propter inimicos suos haec perpetienda sibi fuerant, per quae humanae saluti atque aeternitati consulebat, huius beneplaciti temporis testatur adfectum dicens: inproperium expectauit cor meum et miseriam, desideratas sibi esse huius temporis significans passiones secundum illud diuinae communionis sacramentum: desiderio concupiui hoc manducare: quia in his passionis suae desideriis beneplaciti temporis consistebat effectus.
Finally, he teaches by what follows that he does and suffers nothing for his own sake, saying: “For you know my reproach and my confusion and my shame; all who trouble me are in your sight. My heart has awaited reproach and misery.” The earlier profession is not unlike, when he says: “O God, you know my foolishness, and my sins are not hidden from you.” For, against the error of human opinion, it was known to God alone that this weakness was assumed by him rather than natural. And since he had to endure these things because of his enemies, through which he was providing for human salvation and eternity, he testifies to his affection for this time of good pleasure, saying: “My heart has awaited reproach and misery,” signifying that the sufferings of this time were desired by him, according to that mystery of divine communion: “With desire I have desired to eat this”; because the effect of the time of good pleasure lay in these desires of his passion.
68.18CSEL 22:327–329
Sed pati ad profectum nostrae salutis expectans alterius quoque expectationis desiderio detentus est. sequitur enim: et sustinui commaerentem et non fuit; et consolantes et non inueni. commaerentis et consolantis non solacium, sed fidem quaerit, ut si quis ueniens ex lege et harum omnium passionum intellegens prophetiam secum tamquam in consummatione ipsius legis adsisteret: ut postea Paulus adimplens passiones Iesu Christi et consepultus in baptismo Christum finem esse scit legis. nam ad consummationem humanarum passionum propheticorumque dictorum, qui gestorum futurus finis erat, idem est et querellarum. id enim sequitur: et dederunt in escam meam fel et in siti mea potauerunt me aceto. haec enim ita, ut scripta leguntur, expleta sunt. nam et fel ingestum ei, et aceto potatum euangelia testantur. oblatum quidem secundum Matthaeum fel renuens, sed secundum Iohannem, ut acetum potaret, sitiuit. locus autem ipse his uerbis est dictus: post haec lesus sciens, quoniam omnia consummata sunt, ut impleretur scriptura, ait: sitio; et erat concha posita aceto plena. spongiam igitur plenam aceto hysopo ad miscentes obtulerunt ori eius. cum ergo accepisset Iesus acetum, dixit: consummatum est. uenerat ad oues perditas domus Israhel et expectans consolantem commaerentemque non habuit: non quod consolatione eguerit uolens pati atque mori, sed qui secum super totius populi impietate maereret et qui se ipsum ipsa maerentis secum salute consolaretur, ut omnibus tanto scelere perfunctis solacium in his saltim, qui salui fierent, acciperet secundum illud: et in seruis suis consolabitur; quia non credente Israhel gentes ei essent crediturae. uerum prophetiae non sitisse scribitur, sed, ut inplerentur omnia, sitisse se dixit. quia cunctae nostrae, quae in eo fuerunt, infirmitates non naturales sunt, sed adsumptae. dehinc, ut satisfecisse scripturae propheticae nosceretur, potato aceto omnia consummata esse testatus est, ut plenitudo legis et prophetarum. qui legem et prophetas consummabat, exsisteret.
But while he awaited suffering for the advancement of our salvation, he was also held by the desire of another expectation. For there follows: “And I waited for one who would grieve with me, and there was none; and for comforters, and I found none.” He seeks not the solace of one who grieves with him and comforts him, but faith: that someone coming from the law, and understanding the prophecy of all these sufferings, might stand by him as at the fulfillment of the law itself; as afterward Paul, filling up the sufferings of Jesus Christ and buried with him in baptism, knows that Christ is the end of the law. For to the fulfillment of human sufferings and prophetic sayings, he who was to be the end of the deeds is also the end of the complaints. For there follows: “And they gave me gall for my food, and in my thirst they gave me vinegar to drink.” These things were fulfilled just as they are read written. For the Gospels testify both that gall was brought to him and that he was given vinegar to drink. According to Matthew, he refused the gall that was offered; but according to John, he thirsted so as to drink the vinegar. The passage is told in these words: “After this Jesus, knowing that all things were completed, that the Scripture might be fulfilled, said: I thirst. And a vessel full of vinegar was set there. So they put a sponge full of vinegar on hyssop and brought it to his mouth. When Jesus had received the vinegar, he said: It is finished.” He had come to the lost sheep of the house of Israel, and, waiting for one to comfort him and grieve with him, he found none: not that he needed comfort, since he was willing to suffer and die, but one who would grieve with him over the impiety of the whole people and who would comfort him by the very salvation of the one grieving with him; so that, when all had gone through so great a crime, he might receive solace at least in those who would be saved, according to this: “And he will be comforted in his servants”; because, when Israel did not believe, the nations would believe in him. Yet it is not written that he thirsted; rather he said that he thirsted so that all things might be fulfilled, because all our weaknesses that were in him are not natural but assumed. Then, so that he might be known to have satisfied the prophetic Scripture, after drinking the vinegar he testified that all things were completed, so that he who was completing the law and the prophets might stand forth as the fullness of the law and the prophets.
68.19CSEL 22:329–331
Iam uero. quia intra consummationem oblati fellis et potandi aceti consummanda quoque erat passionis totius prophetia, ad ea, quae postea impietatem tanti facinoris consecuta sunt, sermo se rettulit dicens: fiat mensa eorum coram ipsis in laqueum et in captionem et in retributionem et in scandalum. obscurentur oculi eorum, ne uideant, et dorsum eorum perpetuo incurua. esse mensam sacrificiorum. ut de lege, quae in se futuri est speciem conplexa. taceamus, apostolus testis est dicens:: non potestis mensae domini participes esse et mensae daemoniorum. sed esse mensam scientiae. cum nonnullis locis cognitum sit, tum etiam in his ipsis dictis intellegi oportere idem beatus apostolus ad Romanos scribens interpres est, cum cum obcaecatos esse, ne quid intellegerent, testatur. haec ergo mensa, unde cibus uitae spiritalis accipitur, coram ipsis in laqueum et in captionem et in retributionem et in scandalum facta est: cum uel praescripta legis uel prophetarum uoces ab ecclesiae uiris ad reuelationem diuini consilii tractantur, cum ad adsumendse carnis fidem unigenitus deus in hominis specie et ab Abraham adoratus et cum Iacob conluctatus ostenditur, cum ex Iuda princeps ueniens idem expectatio gentium nuntiatur, cum in Abraham semine omnes patriae gentium benedicendae sunt, cum ex Dauid utero aeterni regni dominus praedicatur, cum secundum Esaiam dominus tamquam ouis ad occisionem ductus nec maxillas ab alapis nec faciem auertit a sputis, cum secundum Ieremiam hic deus noster est, qui disciplinis omnibus Israhel dilecto suo traditis postea in terris uisus sit et inter homines conuersatus sit, cum denique de aduentu eius omnium prophetarum dicta conueniunt. haec itaque doctrinae mensa, uel hic uitalis cibi sermo et laqueus et captio et retributio et scandalum est, cum a nobis deus Iacob esse, qui ab his sit crucifixus, ostenditur. haec enim est retributio tantae impietatis, ut, quod nobis est dei uirtus, his scandalum sit. nam cum inlaqueati captique sint scriptis, intellegentiae tamen carent sensu; et ideo obscurati sunt oculis, ne uideant, id est ne lumen intellegentiae contuerentur, quia secundum euangelium omni habenti dabitur, qui autem non habet, etiam quod habet auferetur ab eo: indigni uidelicet, qui intellegentiae sensum ac lumen acciperent, et ideo euangelicae libertatis scientiam non. adepti perpetuo adhuc legis onere deprimuntur, ut ferant, quod sustinere non possunt. id enim in incuruando dorso per corporalium operum speciem significat.
Now, since the prophecy of the whole passion was also to be fulfilled within the fulfillment of the gall offered and the vinegar to be drunk, the speech turned to what afterward followed the impiety of so great a crime, saying: “Let their table become before them a snare, and a trap, and a recompense, and a stumbling block. Let their eyes be darkened so that they do not see, and bend their back always.” That there is a table of sacrifices (to say nothing of the law, which contained in itself the image of what was to come), the apostle is witness, saying: “You cannot be partakers of the table of the Lord and of the table of demons.” But that there is also a table of knowledge is known in several places, and that it ought to be so understood in these very words the same blessed apostle, writing to the Romans, is the interpreter, when he testifies that they were blinded so as to understand nothing. This table, then, from which the food of spiritual life is received, became before them a snare, a trap, a recompense, and a stumbling block: when the precepts of the law or the voices of the prophets are treated by the men of the church to reveal the divine plan; when, for faith in his taking flesh, the only-begotten God is shown in the form of a man both worshiped by Abraham and wrestling with Jacob; when the prince coming from Judah is announced as the expectation of the nations; when in Abraham’s seed all the families of the nations are to be blessed; when the Lord of the eternal kingdom is proclaimed from David’s womb; when, according to Isaiah, the Lord, led like a sheep to the slaughter, turned away neither his cheeks from the blows nor his face from the spitting; when, according to Jeremiah, “this is our God,” who, having given all instruction to Israel his beloved, was afterward seen on earth and lived among men; when, finally, the sayings of all the prophets agree about his coming. This table of teaching, then, or this word of life-giving food, is a snare, a trap, a recompense, and a stumbling block, when we show that he whom they crucified is the God of Jacob. For this is the recompense of so great an impiety, that what is for us the power of God is a stumbling block to them. For though they are snared and trapped by the Scriptures, they lack the sense of understanding; and therefore their eyes are darkened so that they do not see, that is, so that they do not behold the light of understanding, because, according to the Gospel, “to everyone who has, it will be given; but from him who has not, even what he has will be taken away”: unworthy, that is, to receive the sense and light of understanding; and therefore, not having attained the knowledge of gospel freedom, they are still pressed down for ever by the burden of the law, so that they bear what they cannot sustain. This is what he signifies by the bending of the back, through the image of bodily works.
68.20CSEL 22:331
Sed hanc eorum obcaecati cordis inscientiam alia etiam debitae ultionis poena consequitur. effunde super eos iram tuam, et animatio irae tuse conprehendat eos. fiat habitatio eorum deserta, et in tabernaculis eorum non sit, qui inhabitet. in ira dei poenae constitutionem, non motum animi ad ultionis uoluntatem exardescentis significari saepe tractauimus, quam non subito puniturus intenderet, sed in quam poena dignus incideret. mansit autem haec a prophetis omnibus huic genti impiae denuntiata damnatio. nam euersa mox ac diruta ciuitate deleti sunt gloriosissimo illo templi cultu deleto ornatuque detracto. et ideo habitatione deserta in tabernaculis eorum nullus habitabit.
But this ignorance of their blinded heart is followed by another penalty of due vengeance: “Pour out your anger upon them, and let the wrath of your anger seize them. Let their dwelling be deserted, and let there be none to dwell in their tents.” We have often discussed that by the anger of God is meant the establishment of a penalty, not a movement of mind blazing up with the will for vengeance: a penalty that he did not suddenly aim at in order to punish, but one into which a person worthy of punishment would fall. This condemnation, announced by all the prophets against this impious nation, stood fast. For soon the city was overturned and destroyed, and they were wiped out, that most glorious worship of the temple being abolished and its adornment stripped away. And therefore, their dwelling being deserted, no one will dwell in their tents.
68.21CSEL 22:331
Verum adhuc secundum impietatis incrementa prophetia quoque poenae et ultionis extenditur. quoniam, quem tu percussisti, persecuti sunt et super dolorem uulnerum meorum addiderunt. appone iniquitatem super iniquitatem ipsorum, et non intrent in iustitiam tuam. deleantur de libro uiuentium et cum iustis non scribantur; causam apponendae iniquitatis super iniquitatem ipsorum et repellendi eos, ne in iustitiam intrarent, et delendis de uiuentium libro non scribendisque cum iustis eam esse demonstrans, quod, quem deus percusserit, hi persecuti sint et super dolorem uulnerum suorum addiderint quod doleret.
But the prophecy of punishment and vengeance is extended further according to the growth of impiety: “For they have persecuted him whom you struck, and added to the pain of my wounds. Add iniquity upon their iniquity, and let them not enter into your righteousness. Let them be blotted out of the book of the living, and not be written with the righteous”: showing that the cause of adding iniquity upon their iniquity, of driving them back so that they should not enter into righteousness, and of their being blotted out of the book of the living and not written with the righteous, is this: that they persecuted him whom God had struck, and added to the pain of his wounds what would pain him.
68.22CSEL 22:331–332
Et forte non iniuste, quem deus percusserit, persecuti esse uideantur; ac de his, quae percussa a deo sint, quid sentiri oporteat, ante tractandum est, ut, quatenus et haec percussio salutaris et illa percussi persecutio impia sit, possit intellegi. percussit dominus Sodomam et Gomorram ultimis sceleribus pollutas et abominatas; et inuenio his ad misericordiae reconciliationem hoc, quod percussae sunt, profecisse, cum tolerabilius his die iudicii sit futurum, quam his ciuitatibus, in quibus de apostolorum pedibus puluis excussus sit. percussam quoque synagogam Dathan et Abiron plaga dignissima cognitum est, sed in animis eorum ea, quibus maxime peccauerant, sanctificata sunt opera. et ne per singula, quae sunt multa, discurram, cum et apostolus in interitum carnis ad salutem spiritus tradat, dominus ipse, quid percutiens proficiat, ostendit dicens: uidete, uidete, quia ego sum, et non est deus praeter me. ego interimam et ego uiuificabo; percutiam et ego sanabo, ut percutiendi causam proficisci ex causa sanationis ostenderet.
And perhaps they might seem not unjustly to have persecuted him whom God had struck; so we must first discuss what is to be thought about those who have been struck by God, so that it may be understood how far this striking is salutary and that persecution of the one struck impious. The Lord struck Sodom and Gomorrah, polluted and abominable with the worst crimes; and I find that their being struck served them toward reconciliation with mercy, since it will be more tolerable for them on the day of judgment than for those cities in which the dust was shaken off the apostles’ feet. It is known too that the synagogue of Dathan and Abiram was struck with a most deserved plague; yet the works by which they had chiefly sinned were sanctified in their souls. And not to run through each case, which are many: since the apostle too hands one over to the destruction of the flesh for the salvation of the spirit, the Lord himself shows what he achieves by striking, saying: “See, see that I am, and there is no God besides me. I will kill and I will make alive; I will strike and I will heal”: to show that the cause of striking proceeds from the cause of healing.
68.23CSEL 22:332–333
Percussus ergo et dominus peccata nostra suscipiens et pro nobis dolens, ut in eo usque ad infirmitatem crucis mortisque percusso sanitas nobis per resurrectionem ex mortuis redderetur. percussum autem se ipse testatus est, commonefaciens discipulos dicti huius: percutiam pastorem, et dispargentur oues gregis. sed et. apostolus dicti huius significationem haud dissimiliter confirmat dicens: qui filio suo dilecto non pepercit. non pepercit itaque dilecto filio suo, quem et colonis uinese non ignarus, quod occisuri eum essent, destinauit. non pepercerat autem primo illi de terra limo Adae. quem de paradiso post culpam, ne lignum uitae attingens in aeternitate poenae maneret, eiecit, ut naturam corporis eius Adam e caelis secundus adsumens parique morte percussus eam rursum in uitam aeternam iam sine poenae aeternitate reuocaret. hunc igitur ita a deo percussum persecuti sunt, super dolorem uulnerum dolorem persecutionis huius addentes. pro nobis enim secundum prophetam dolet et idcirco est esse in doloribus aestimatus. quod enim postea nominis sui odium susceperint, quatenus silentium resurrectionis pecunia emerint, quibus apostolos terroribus iniuriisque uexauerint, cognitum est. et quia haec super dolorem uulnerum addiderunt, adponetur super iniquitatem iniquitas.
The Lord too, then, was struck, taking up our sins and grieving for us, so that in him, struck even to the weakness of the cross and death, health might be restored to us through the resurrection from the dead. He himself testified that he was struck, reminding the disciples of this saying: “I will strike the shepherd, and the sheep of the flock will be scattered.” The apostle too confirms the meaning of this saying in much the same way, saying: “who did not spare his beloved Son.” He did not spare his beloved Son, then, whom he also sent to the tenants of the vineyard, not unaware that they would kill him. Nor had he spared that first Adam from the mire of the earth, whom he cast out of paradise after his fault, lest, touching the tree of life, he should remain in an eternity of punishment; so that the second Adam from heaven, taking the nature of his body and struck by a like death, might call it back again into eternal life, now without an eternity of punishment. This one, then, so struck by God, they persecuted, adding to the pain of his wounds the pain of this persecution. For, according to the prophet, he grieves for us, and therefore he was reckoned to be in sorrows. For it is known how afterward they took up hatred of his name, how they bought the silence about the resurrection with money, and with what terrors and injuries they harassed the apostles. And since they added these things to the pain of his wounds, iniquity will be added to iniquity.
68.24CSEL 22:333–334
Adpositae autem iniquitatis poena est, ne intrent in iustitiam dei, id est ne concorporales et conparticipes Christo fiant, qui nobis secundum apostolum iustitia et sanctificatio et redemptio a deo factus est. exclusi uero iustitiae ingressu necesse est a libro uiuentium deleantur. scripti enim erant in Abrahae benedictionibus, cuius semen sicut stellae caeli et sicut harena maris ad oram litoris abundaret. a quo libro cum omnem populum deleri Moyses metueret, se primum deleri deprecatus est, optans, ut opinor, secundum apostolum anathema pro fratribus suis esse. et quia super dolorem uulnerum dolorem persecutionis addentes recursum paenitentiae perdiderunt, deleti de uiuentium libro ne postea quidem scribi cum iustis meruerunt: ut intellegi possit alium uiuentium, alium librum esse iustorum. nec ambiguum est eos in uiuentium libro esse, qui antea sine ulla Christi cognitione pie in lege uersati omnia praescripta legis inpleuerint, de quibus secundum legem apostolus ita docuit: quia qui fecerit ea, uiuet in illis. scribuntur autem in libro iustorum, quibus iustitia Christus est factus. iustus enim ex fide uiuit. quo de libro ad apostolos dominus ita loquitur, dicens: gaudete et exultate. quia nomina uestra scripta sunt in caelis. et idcirco duplex significatio delendorum de libro uiuentium et non scribendorum in libro iustorum fuit, quia post librum uiuentium liber esset relicus iustorum. apostolis autem hinc magnae gratulationis causa suggeritur, quia plus sit in libro scriptos esse iustorum, quam de uiuentium libro non esse deletos.
The penalty of the added iniquity is that they should not enter into the righteousness of God, that is, that they should not become of the same body and partakers with Christ, who, according to the apostle, was made by God our righteousness, sanctification, and redemption. And those shut out from entering righteousness must be blotted out of the book of the living. For they had been written in the blessings of Abraham, whose seed would abound like the stars of heaven and like the sand of the sea on the shore. When Moses feared that the whole people would be blotted out of that book, he prayed that he himself be blotted out first, wishing, as I think, according to the apostle, to be accursed for his brothers. And since, adding the pain of persecution to the pain of his wounds, they lost the way back of repentance, blotted out of the book of the living, they did not deserve to be written afterward even with the righteous: so that it can be understood that the book of the living is one and the book of the righteous another. And there is no doubt that those are in the book of the living who formerly, without any knowledge of Christ, lived devoutly in the law and fulfilled all its precepts, of whom the apostle taught according to the law thus: “for whoever does them will live in them.” But those are written in the book of the righteous for whom Christ has been made righteousness; for the righteous lives by faith. Of this book the Lord speaks to the apostles, saying: “Rejoice and exult, because your names are written in heaven.” And therefore the meaning of being blotted out of the book of the living and of not being written in the book of the righteous was twofold, because after the book of the living the book of the righteous remained. And here the apostles are given a cause of great rejoicing, because it is more to be written in the book of the righteous than not to be blotted out of the book of the living.
68.25CSEL 22:334–335
Tenet autem in se eum confessionis modum, quem in nobis esse oportet fidei, ut in eo tam natura hominis quam natura dei cognita sit. in forma enim serui ueniens euacuauit se ex dei forma. nam in forma hominis exsistere manens in dei forma qui potuit? aboleri autem dei forma, ut tantum serui esset forma, non potuit. ipse enim est et se ex forma dei inaniens et formam hominis adsumens, quia neque euacuatio illa ex dei forma naturae caelestis interitus est, neque formae seruilis adsumptio tamquam genuinae originis condicionisque natura est, cum id, quod adsumptum est, non proprietas interior sit, sed exterior accessio; quod ipsum consequentibus docet dicens: pauper et dolens sum ego; et salus uultus tui, deus, suscepit me. pauper est, qui secundum apostolum, cum esset omnium diues, seipsum, ut nos ditesceremus, paupertauit; dolens est, qui secundum prophetam pro nobis dolet. sed hunc pauperem ac dolentem salus ea, quae uultus dei est, suscepit. forma et uultus et facies et imago non differunt. idipsum enim in utro horum significari communis est sensus. hunc igitur pauperem in salutem uultus dei, qui forma dei est, suscepit, id est adsumptum ab se hominem unigenitus deus, qui imago inuisibilis dei est, in seternitatis suae uita, quae in deo salus esse intellegitur, collocauit. omnis enim' lingua confitebitur, quia dominus Iesus in gloria dei patris est, id est susceptus homo in naturam diuinitatis acceptus.
The psalm holds in itself that manner of confession which must be in us by faith, so that both the nature of man and the nature of God are known in him. For coming in the form of a servant, he emptied himself from the form of God. For how could one remaining in the form of God exist in the form of a man? Yet the form of God could not be abolished so that there should be only the form of a servant. For it is the same one who both empties himself from the form of God and takes the form of man; because neither is that emptying from the form of God the destruction of the heavenly nature, nor is the taking of the servile form a nature of his own origin and condition, since what was taken is not an inner property but an outward addition. He teaches this very thing by what follows, saying: “I am poor and sorrowful; and the salvation of your countenance, O God, has taken me up.” He is poor who, according to the apostle, though he was rich in all things, made himself poor so that we might become rich; he is sorrowful who, according to the prophet, grieves for us. But this poor and sorrowful one the salvation that is the countenance of God took up. Form, countenance, face, and image do not differ; common sense holds that the same thing is meant by any of them. This poor one, then, the countenance of God, which is the form of God, took up into salvation; that is, the only-begotten God, who is the image of the invisible God, placed the man taken up by him in the life of his eternity, which is understood to be salvation in God. For every tongue will confess that the Lord Jesus is in the glory of God the Father, that is, that the man taken up has been received into the nature of divinity.
68.26CSEL 22:335
Esse autem in eo finem legis et sacrificium laudis euangelica confessio est, ita ut hostiarum sanguine et oblatione cessante sacrificium gratiae laudisque praelatum sit. hoc enim isto paupere et dolente in salutem uultus dei formaeque suscepto continuatur et sequitur: laudabo nomen tuum cum cantico, magnificabo eum cum laude. et placebit deo super uitulum nouellum cornua producentem et ungulas. haec itaque laudatio nominis dei laudisque ipsius magnificatio super uitulum nouellum placebit. talis enim ante in lege pro peccato offerebatur, cuius aetatem per tenera ungularum et cornuum incrementa significat. placebit ergo super uitulum peccati honor laudis secundum illud: sacrificium laudis honorificabit me; et illic iter, quo ostendam illi salutare dei. iter igitur ostendendi salutaris dei in laudis est sacrificio.
That in him there is the end of the law and the sacrifice of praise is the confession of the gospel, so that, with the blood and offering of victims ceasing, the sacrifice of thanksgiving and praise is preferred. For when this poor and sorrowful one has been taken up into the salvation of God’s countenance and form, there continues and follows: “I will praise your name with a song; I will magnify it with praise. And it will please God more than a young calf putting forth horns and hoofs.” This praise of God’s name, then, and this magnifying of his praise, will please more than a young calf. For such a calf was formerly offered in the law for sin, whose age he indicates by the tender growth of hoofs and horns. The honor of praise, then, will please more than the calf for sin, according to this: “The sacrifice of praise will honor me, and there is the way by which I will show him the salvation of God.” The way of showing the salvation of God, then, lies in the sacrifice of praise.
68.27CSEL 22:335–336
Et id ipsum consequentibus psalmus ostendit. nam post placituram magnificentiam laudis super uitulum nouellum subiecit: uideant pauperes et laetentur. quaerite dominum, et uiuet anima uestra: quoniam exaudiuit pauperem dominus et uinctos suos non spreuit. hoc scilicet tempus laetentur uidentes, cuius sacrificium in laude sit, quia illic ostendetur salutare dei. et ideo deus ab his ad uitam animae quaeretur. carnis enim et corporis timeri iudicem uetuit, quia animam in gehennam mittere solus potens sit deus. quaerendi autem dei ad uitam animae ea causa est, quia exaudiuit deus pauperem, eum scilicet, qui se paupertauit, ut nos ditesceremus, quem in salutem uultus sui suscepit, hi quo nobis peccata donauit non spernens uinctos suos, siue qui uincti sunt Christi, ut. Paulus in uinculis gloriatur, siue quos satanas peccatis uinctos ut armatus et praepotens obtinebat, secundum illud: disrupisti uincula mea, tibi sacrificabo hostiam laudis. laetantur ergo in his, quae uideant, pauperes, quia scriptum sit: beati pauperes spiritu, quia ipsorum est regnum caelorum.
And the psalm shows this very thing by what follows. For after the magnificence of praise that will please more than a young calf, he added: “Let the poor see and rejoice. Seek the Lord, and your soul will live; for the Lord has heard the poor and has not despised his prisoners.” Let them rejoice, that is, seeing this time whose sacrifice is in praise, because there the salvation of God will be shown. And therefore God will be sought by them for the life of the soul. For he forbade us to fear the judge of the flesh and body, because God alone is able to send the soul into Gehenna. The reason for seeking God for the life of the soul is that God heard the poor one, namely him who made himself poor that we might become rich, whom he took up into the salvation of his countenance, in whom he forgave us our sins, not despising his prisoners: either those who are prisoners of Christ, as Paul glories in his chains, or those whom Satan, as the armed and very powerful one, held bound by sins, according to this: “You have broken my bonds; to you I will offer a sacrifice of praise.” The poor, then, rejoice in what they see, because it is written: “Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.”
68.28CSEL 22:336–337
Et quia his, qui pauperes spiritu sunt, in caelorum regno constitutis creatura omnis congemescens et dolens in gloria filiorum dei liberanda est, uanitati non sua sponte subiecta, nunc quoque ob laetantes pauperes uitamque quaerentes exauditumque pauperem uinctosque non spretos ipsa illa ad laudem dei expectans reuelationem pauperum gloriae creatura aduocatur: laudent eum caeli et terra, mare et omnia repentia in eo: sub horum elementorum commemoratione creaturarum omnium liberandarum sensum mentemque significans, ut, dum caelum et terra et mare dicitur, cognoscantur domino Iesu Christo caelestia et terrestria et inferna genu flectere. in his enim, quae in mari repunt — cum tamen in aquatilibus natatus magis sit ex natura quam reptio — ea, quae in infernis degunt, docentur, cum profundum maris sedem intellegamus inferni.
And since, when those who are poor in spirit have been established in the kingdom of heaven, the whole creation, groaning and in pain, is to be freed into the glory of the sons of God, having been subjected to vanity not by its own will, now too, on account of the rejoicing poor, those who seek life, the poor one who was heard, and the prisoners who were not despised, that very creation which awaits the revealing of the glory of the poor is called to the praise of God: “Let heaven and earth praise him, the sea and all things that creep in it,” signifying, under the mention of these elements, the sense and mind of all creatures to be freed; so that, when heaven, earth, and sea are mentioned, things in heaven, on earth, and under the earth may be understood to bend the knee to the Lord Jesus Christ. For by the things that creep in the sea (although in water creatures swimming is natural rather than creeping) those that live in the underworld are meant, since we understand the depth of the sea to be the seat of the underworld.
68.29CSEL 22:337–338
Causam autem, cur adhuc caelum et terra et mare deum laudet, ostendit dicens: quoniam dominus saluificauit Sion, et aedificabuntur ciuitates ludae. et inhabitabunt in ea et hereditabunt terram. et semen seruorum eius possidebunt eam. et qui diligunt nomen eius inhabitabunt in ea. laus uniuersa ex rerum admirabilitate proficiscitur. tum enim aliquid laude dignum uidetur, cum opus ipsum ita magnificum atque praeclarum est, ut et prouidentiam ac uirtutem gerentis et gestorum decus usumque contineat. quod itaque sensum atque opinionem ingenii communis excellat, id per admirationem sui meretur et laudem: caelum ergo, quod tanto ornatu distinctum, inpletum est tantosque motus atque cursus incredibili constantia ac uarietate conseruet, ut annum inter hiemem caloremque temperatis autumni et ueris temporibus moderetur et finiat; terra autem. quae supernis inumbrata naturis uel conplexa in sese uel suscepta sinu semina et contineat et alat et fecundet. et secundum uniuscuiusque generis naturam usum maturitate consolidet; mare autem, quod, uitae nostrae modo, nunc hausto spiritu nunc refuso animetur et maneat motuque in tanta sui uarietate rationibus se lunaris incrementi detrimentique moderetur et profunda infinitaque sui obice mentem humanae opinionis excedat, ut neque quid extra se neque quid intra sit sensu persequente capiamus. in his tamen tantis tamque admirabilibus rerum naturarumque uirtutibus in deo hoc, quod Sion salua sit ciuitatesque Iudaeae aedificandae sint, caeli, terra, maria laudabunt? humana utique opera et caduca et ipso tempore ac uetustate soluenda! quod si extructas esse eas laude sit dignum, non magis conseruatas esse eas, ne destruerentur, proficeret ad laudem?
He shows the reason why heaven, earth, and sea should still praise God, saying: “For the Lord has saved Zion, and the cities of Judah will be built; and they will dwell there and inherit the land; and the seed of his servants will possess it; and those who love his name will dwell in it.” All praise proceeds from the wonder of things. For a thing seems worthy of praise when the work itself is so magnificent and splendid that it contains both the foresight and power of the doer and the beauty and usefulness of what is done. So whatever surpasses the sense and opinion of common understanding earns praise through the wonder it causes. Heaven, then, adorned with such splendor, filled, and keeping such great motions and courses with incredible constancy and variety, so that it governs and completes the year between winter and heat with the tempered seasons of autumn and spring; the earth, which, shaded by the natures above, holds, nourishes, and makes fruitful the seeds either enclosed in itself or received into its bosom, and strengthens them to ripeness for use according to the nature of each kind; the sea, which, in the manner of our life, is animated and endures, now drawing in breath and now pouring it back, governs itself in its great variety of motion by the reckoning of the moon’s waxing and waning, and by the barrier of its infinite depths exceeds the mind of human opinion, so that we cannot grasp by following sense either what is beyond it or what is within it: amid such great and wonderful powers of things and natures, will heaven, earth, and seas praise God for this, that Zion is saved and the cities of Judea are to be built? Human works, surely, and perishable, to be dissolved by time itself and age! And if it were worthy of praise that they were built, would it not serve praise more that they were preserved from being destroyed?
68.30CSEL 22:338–339
Non ergo hae maximae utique praestantissimaeque rerum omnium uel magis, quibus uniuersae res contineantur alanturque, naturae maris, terrae et caeli ad inanium paene ac leuium operum laudem aduocantur: id est, quia Sion saluificata sit extructaeque Iudaeae ciuitates, quas post Babyloniorum Antiochique uictoriam bellum quoque Romani regis absumeret. dehinc ipsam hanc inopem impiamque sententiam rei quoque communis scientia et ratio condemnat. nam ob id aedificari ciuitates Iudaeae propheticus sermo declarat, ut in ea, quae salua facta sit, Sion inhabitent. quid hic secundum humanas extructiones ciuitatumque fabricas intellegentiae loci est, cum neque in aedificandis his laus ulla sit, quae sint postea destruendae, neque ratio et natura patiatur aedificari ob id ciuitates, ut inhabitent ciuitatem?
So these greatest and most excellent natures of all things, or rather those by which all things are held together and nourished, the natures of sea, earth, and heaven, are not called to praise almost empty and trivial works: that is, because Zion was saved and the cities of Judea were built, which, after the victories of the Babylonians and of Antiochus, the war of the Roman king also destroyed. Further, the common knowledge and reason of the matter condemn this poor and impious opinion. For the prophetic speech declares that the cities of Judea are built so that they may dwell in Zion, which has been saved. What room is there here for understanding according to human buildings and the construction of cities, since there is no praise in building cities that are later to be destroyed, and reason and nature do not allow cities to be built so that they may dwell in a city?
68.31CSEL 22:339
Est autem digna plane deo laus caeli, terrae ac maris confessione tribuenda, quod illa filia Sion, quae inuecta in Hierusalem tanto praeeuntium sequentiumque comitatu, salua per deum sit; in quam angeli concupiscunt, in quam creatura omnis gemens dolensque prospectat, in qua aeternitatis nostrae gloriam laudemque speculamur, in qua aedificatarum ecclesiarum ciuitates manebunt. Sion enim, licet colliculus templo, quod in Hierusalem fuit, iunctus sit, tamen secundum interpretationem ex hebraeo in latinum graecumque sermonem speculatio dicitur. in hoc ergo corpore domini, quo resurrexit ex mortuis, quo a dextris uirtutis consedit, quo in gloria dei patris est, spem nostram uitamque speculamur. et quia reuelationem nostrae in eo claritatis et ipsa in eandem liberanda creatura omnis expectat, salutem huius Sion sub significatione caeli et terrae et maris laudat; quia omnia in caelis et in terra pacificata et reconciliata per eam deo sint, quia in resurrectionis gloriam, cuius spem in ipso ex mortuis resurgente speculamur, peccatum, mors, corruptio a uita et inmortalitate deuorata sint et exhausta. nam. si super unius peccatoris paenitentiam magnum in caelis gaudium est angelorum, quanto magis in totius mundi reconciliatione laetitia sit?
But praise plainly worthy of God, to be given by the confession of heaven, earth, and sea, is this: that that daughter of Zion, who was carried into Jerusalem with so great a company going before and following, has been saved by God; she into whom the angels long to look, toward whom all creation, groaning and in pain, looks forward, in whom we contemplate the glory and praise of our eternity, in whom the cities of the built churches will remain. For Zion, though it is a hill joined to the temple that was in Jerusalem, is nevertheless, according to its interpretation from Hebrew into Latin and Greek, called “watchtower” (speculatio). In this body of the Lord, then, in which he rose from the dead, in which he sat down at the right hand of power, in which he is in the glory of God the Father, we contemplate our hope and life. And since all creation awaits the revelation of our glory in him and is itself to be freed into the same, it praises the salvation of this Zion under the figure of heaven, earth, and sea; because all things in heaven and on earth have been made peace with and reconciled to God through it, because sin, death, and corruption have been swallowed up and exhausted by life and immortality in the glory of the resurrection, whose hope we contemplate in him rising from the dead. For if there is great joy of the angels in heaven over the repentance of one sinner, how much more joy will there be at the reconciliation of the whole world?
68.32CSEL 22:339–340
Et quia in finem pro his, qui inmutabuntur, est psalmus, Iudaeae etiam ciuitates, ut in Sion inhabitent, aedificandae esse laudantur. et ciuitates ipsas conuentus hominum esse quis dubitet? ecclesiam uero ex conuentu plebium effici notum est. in hac ergo Sion, quae in se etiam illam primitiuorum conscriptorum in caelis conplexa sit ciuitatem, habitatio nostra perficitur, qui ut semen Abrahae ita et semen Iudae manemus. non enim qui in manifesto Iudaeus, sed qui in occulto Iudaeus et qui in spiritu. ob quod in his nostris conuentibus ciuitates quoque Iudaeae sumus.
And since the psalm is “to the end, for those who will be changed,” the cities of Judea are praised as about to be built so that they may dwell in Zion. And who would doubt that cities are themselves gatherings of men? It is known that the church is made from the gathering of the peoples. In this Zion, then, which embraces in itself that city of the firstborn enrolled in heaven, our dwelling is completed, who remain the seed of Judah as we are the seed of Abraham. For he is not a Jew who is one outwardly, but he who is a Jew inwardly and in the spirit. Therefore in these gatherings of ours we too are the cities of Judea.
68.33CSEL 22:340
Ac ne sibi Israhel impius in ciuitates Iudaeae gloriam eo, quod secundum carnem seruorum dei semen est, uindicaret, eorum hereditatem, eorum habitationem in Sion esse demonstrat, qui nomen domini diligant: ut pietatis magis sit, non generis electio, quia praestet omnibus caritas dei, quae in Cbristo est, et Petrum nihil aliud, quam utrum se amaret, interrogat dominus noster Iesus Christus dei filius, qui est benedictus in saecula saeculorum. amen.
And lest impious Israel should claim for itself glory in the cities of Judea on the ground that it is, according to the flesh, the seed of God’s servants, he shows that the inheritance and dwelling in Zion belong to those who love the name of the Lord: so that the choice is rather of godliness than of race, because the love of God which is in Christ surpasses all things, and our Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God, who is blessed for ever and ever, asks Peter nothing else than whether he loved him. Amen.
Tractates 69
69.1CSEL 22:340–341
Alius hic in rememorationem psalmus est; nam tricesimo et septimo eadem inscriptio est. ex ipsa autem uerbi huius significatione usuque communi, quid in rememoratione praescribi intellegendum sit, docemur. nam rememorationis precatio ei conpetit, qui se incidere in obliuionem eius, a quo uel auxilium uel ueniam expectat, pertimescit et aut sui ad salutem commemorationem fieri desideret aut eorum ad poenam, qui sibi semper infesti sunt. et quidem in anteriore superscriptionis ipsius psalmo de uenia et salute tractatum est, qui totus ex persona dolentis domini pro nobis portantisque peccata nostra consistit. in hoc uero necessitas poscendae ueniae non relicta est, quia iam superior et contiguus huic psalmus in salnificatae Sion aedificatarumque ciuitatum Iudaeae laude conclusus est. sed est in eo rememoratio in impios ultionis et retributionis in sanctos. et quia non illi Dauid, sed in illum Dauid psalmus in finem est, secundum editam in anterioribus ex nominis proprietate rationem ex persona domini tractabitur, ut ipso psalmi fine noscetur.
This is another psalm “for remembrance”; for the thirty-seventh has the same title. From the meaning of the word itself and from common usage we are taught what is to be understood by the heading “for remembrance.” For a prayer for remembrance befits one who fears that he will fall into the forgetfulness of him from whom he expects either help or pardon, and who desires that remembrance be made either of himself for salvation or of those who are always hostile to him for punishment. In the earlier psalm with the same title, pardon and salvation were treated; it consists entirely of the person of the Lord grieving for us and bearing our sins. In this one, however, no need of asking pardon remains, since the preceding psalm, next to this one, concluded with the praise of Zion saved and the cities of Judea built. But in it there is remembrance of vengeance on the impious and of reward for the saints. And since the psalm is “to the end,” not to David himself but toward that David, it will be treated, according to the account given earlier from the proper meaning of the name, as in the person of the Lord, as will be known from the very end of the psalm.
69.2CSEL 22:341–342
Domine deus, in adiutorium meum intende. piae confessionis haec uox est, adiutorium a domino et deo sperare; sed plus hic nunc, quam in deprecationibus sperandi auxilii solet, sermo significat. uideri enim id potest, qui in adiutorium positus sit super potentem, nunc in adiutorium, in quod positus est, ut intendatur orare. et quis hic sit. non ambigitur ex psalmo, in quo inest scriptum: posui adiutorium super potentem, exaltaui electum de plebe mea. inueni Dauid seruum meum. et ne aliquid in illum Dauid Iessae referri posset, adiecit: et ego primogenitum ponam eum, excelsum super reges terrae. ac ne, quod primogenitus est, ad primitias indulti ei a deo regni trahi posset, id, quod soli domino Iesu Christo proprium esset, ostendit dicens: et sedis eius sicut sol in conspectu meo, et sicut luna perfecta manet in aeternum et testis in caelo fidelis.
“O Lord God, attend to my help.” This is the voice of devout confession, to hope for help from the Lord and God; but here the speech now signifies more than usually in prayers for hoped-for help. For it can be seen that he who has been set as help over the mighty now prays that attention be given to the help in which he has been set. And who this is is not in doubt from the psalm in which it is written: “I have laid help upon one who is mighty; I have exalted one chosen from my people; I have found David my servant.” And lest anything should be referred to that David son of Jesse, he added: “And I will make him firstborn, high above the kings of the earth.” And lest the fact that he is firstborn should be drawn to the firstfruits of the kingdom granted him by God, he showed what was proper to the Lord Jesus Christ alone, saying: “And his throne is like the sun in my sight, and like the full moon it remains for ever, a faithful witness in heaven.”
69.3CSEL 22:342–343
Nunc ergo, qui aduersum potentem positus sit adiutor et qui intendi in adiutorium suum precatur, poenam in eos, qui sibi aduersantur, expostulat dicens: confundantur et reuereantur, qui quaerunt animam meam: auertantur retrorsum et erubescant, qui cogitant mihi mala. auertantur statim erubescentes, qui dicunt mihi: euge euge. ex uerbis loquellae sermonisque nostri diuinus sermo pendendus est. pudor et confusio ex dedecore est, auersio ex repulsa est; reditus uero non in alia loca magis quam in ea est, unde digressio est. qui quaerunt ergo animam sancti huius, qui in adiutorium suum orat intendi, primum confundentur, post etiam auertentur, dehinc auertentur non in alia, sed retrorsum. et idem est dictorum ordo, qui et rerum. confundentur enim eius animam quaerendo, quem cum peremerint, scient eum uiuere: quia deus uitae et resurrectionis est dominus. dehinc postea auertentur, ne occurrant cum sanctis obuiam Christo in nubibus raptis. postremo auersio non in alia quam retrorsum. resurgentes enim ex mortuis rursum ad poenae ultionisque iudicium in infima terrae. unde emerserant, reuertentur. omnis enim caro resurget, sed non omnis demutabitur; et unumquemque in carne siue bona siue mala, prout gessit, recipere constitutum est. ergo et quaerentes animam et mala cogitantes et euge euge dicentes et confundentur et auertentur et reuertentur resurrectione confusi, ab occursu repulsi, in inferna reuocati. euge euge autem inridentium uox est, eorum scilicet, qui dixerint: saluos fecit alios, se ipsum saluum facere non potest.
Now, then, he who has been set as helper against the mighty, and who prays that attention be given to his help, demands punishment on those who oppose him, saying: “Let those who seek my soul be put to shame and confounded; let those who plot evil against me be turned back and blush. Let those who say to me, Aha, aha, be turned away at once, blushing.” The divine speech is to be weighed from the words of our speech and talk. Shame and confusion come from disgrace; turning away comes from repulse; and a return is to no other places than those from which one set out. Those, then, who seek the soul of this holy one, who prays that attention be given to his help, will first be put to shame, afterward be turned away, and then be turned not elsewhere but back. And the order of the words is the same as that of the events. For they will be put to shame by seeking the soul of him whom, when they have killed him, they will know to be alive; because he is the God of life and the Lord of resurrection. Then afterward they will be turned away, so that they do not go to meet Christ with the saints caught up in the clouds. Finally, the turning is to nowhere else than back. For rising from the dead, they will return again to the judgment of punishment and vengeance in the lowest parts of the earth, from which they had come up. For all flesh will rise, but not all will be changed; and it has been appointed that each receive in the flesh, whether good or evil, according to what he has done. Those, then, who seek his soul, plot evil, and say “Aha, aha,” will be put to shame, turned away, and turned back: confounded by the resurrection, repelled from the meeting, called back to the underworld. “Aha, aha” is the voice of mockers, namely of those who said: “He saved others; he cannot save himself.”
69.4CSEL 22:343–344
Sed post hanc de impiis precationem, quia rememorationis erat psalmus, pro sanctorum quoque fuit spebus orandum. sequitur enim: exultent et laetentur in te omnes, qui quaerunt te, et dicant semper: magnificetur deus, qui diligunt salutare tuum. ut confusio et reuerentia iusti animam quaerentibus, ita exsultatio et laetitia quaerentibus deum, quia secundum prophetam resurgent alii in confusionem, alii in laetitiam. et ut retrorsum erubescentes auertantur, qui mala cogitant, qui dicunt euge euge, ita qui salutare dei diligent ad confessionem magnificetur dei proficiunt, ut ex gratia indultae sibi a deo exultationis laudis confessio augeatur. non enim aliquo deus, qui idem atque aeternus est, indiget, aut quicquam in rerum naturis et mentium opinionibus est, quod expectet. quod enim incremento demutabile est, id detrimento saepe demutatur. deus autem, qui idem origo et causa gignentibus est, ad aeternae beatitudinis naturam sibi ipse sufficiens nihil extra, quod sibi desit, ne aliunde expectet, derelinquit. magnificatur autem per beneficiorum suorum incrementa nobiscum, cum magnificentia eius et commodorum nostrorum sensu ac iucunditate et referendae gratiae laude cumuletur. ergo quotiensque magnificetur dicimus, totiens aut optandi nobis a deo muneris uota sunt, aut sumpti perceptique confessio est, magnificentiae eius laude nobiscum per commodorum nostrorum incrementa nascente.
But after this prayer about the impious, since the psalm was one of remembrance, prayer also had to be made for the hopes of the saints. For there follows: “Let all who seek you exult and be glad in you, and let those who love your salvation always say: Let God be magnified.” As shame and confusion come to those who seek the soul of the righteous one, so exultation and joy come to those who seek God; because, according to the prophet, some will rise to shame and others to joy. And as those who plot evil and say “Aha, aha” are turned back blushing, so those who love the salvation of God advance to the confession, “Let God be magnified,” so that from the grace of the exultation granted them by God the confession of praise may grow. For God, who is the same and eternal, needs nothing, nor is there anything in the natures of things or the opinions of minds that he awaits. For what can be changed by increase is often changed by loss. But God, who is himself origin and cause to things that come to be, sufficient to himself for the nature of eternal blessedness, leaves nothing outside lacking to him, so that he would await it from elsewhere. But he is magnified with us through the increase of his benefits, when his magnificence is heaped up by our sense and enjoyment of our blessings and by the praise of giving thanks. So whenever we say “Let him be magnified,” it is either a prayer for a gift to be desired by us from God, or a confession of a gift received and taken, his magnificence arising in our praise through the increase of our blessings.
69.5CSEL 22:344
Oportuit autem psalmum, qui rememorationis in finem est, digno rememorationis ipsius fine concludi. sequitur enim: ego autem egenus et pauper sum; dominus adiuuat me. adiutor meus et liberator meus tu domine, ne tardaueris. neque regis dignitati neque regni opulentiae paupertatis atque inopiae professio congruit, sed ei, qui, ut nos ditesceremus, pauperem se praestitit, cui ne ad paschae quidem cenam nisi quaesita et aliena domus fuerit adiuuari se itaque rogat. in forma enim serui oboediens usque ad crucis mortem factus est. citum quoque auxilium, ut liberetur, orat, ne quae rememorationis tarditas sit, qui et ipsas illas passionis moras non ferens proditori dixerit: fac, quod facis, cito, dum liberari in se susceptae carnis infirmitatem maturatae resurrectionis uirtute festinat dominus noster Iesus Christus, qui est benedictus in saecula saeculorum. amen.
The psalm of remembrance “to the end” had to be concluded with a fitting end of the remembrance itself. For there follows: “But I am needy and poor; the Lord helps me. You are my helper and my deliverer, O Lord; do not delay.” The profession of poverty and need fits neither the dignity of a king nor the wealth of a kingdom, but him who made himself poor so that we might become rich, who had not even for the Passover supper any house but one sought out and belonging to another. So he asks to be helped; for in the form of a servant he became obedient even to the death of the cross. He prays also for quick help to be delivered, so that there may be no delay in the remembrance, he who, not bearing even the delays of his passion, said to the betrayer: “What you are doing, do quickly,” as our Lord Jesus Christ, who is blessed for ever and ever, hastens to free the weakness of the flesh he took up in himself by the power of a speedy resurrection. Amen.
Tractates 91
91.1CSEL 22:345–346
Psalmus cantici in die sabbati. Bonum est confiteri domino et psallere nomini tuo, altissime, et reliqua. post legis tempora et cognitionem ueritatis conuenit corpus ipsum potius quam umbram corporis contueri. lex enim eorum, quae in domino nostro Iesu Christo inplenda erant, speciem conplectitur; non ipsa ueritas, sed in ea meditatio ueritatis, utilis fide potius quam effectu, imitatione quam genere. ea enim, quae obseruari praecepta sunt, non uirtute efficientiae ipsius utilia erant, sed obseruantium fide salutaria, ut sacrificiorum diuersitates et holocaustomatum religiones et circumcisionis cura et sabbati otium. haec enim omnia et praetermissa culpam habebant et gesta sub futurorum fide proderant, sicut ait beatus apostolus: prius autem, quam ueniret fides, sub lege conclusi custodiebamur in ea fide, quae incipiebat. reuelari. itaque lex paedagoga nostra facta est in Christo, uti ex fide iustificemur. at ubi uenit fides, iam non sumus sub paedagoga; omnes enim filii estis fidei. ergo quotienscumque aliquid ex lege relegitur, in opere praesentium mandatorum speculum futurorum est contuendum. et erat quidem congruum de singulis superius conprehensis adferre rationem, ut secundum apostoli doctrinam uniuersa intellegerentur fide futurorum potius quam uirtute ipsius efficientiae profuisse; tamen in unum congesta omnia audientibus ne non tam cognitionem potius quam onus adferant, unam ex superioribus partem retractemus et eam scilicet, quae; tempori necessaria est, id est sabbati diei; quia ita psalmus inscribitur: psalmus cantici in die sabbati, ut cum per scripturarum caelestium auctoritatem, quae ratio in sabbati requie contineatur, cognouerimus, parem ceterarum quoque rerum, quae in lege sunt, efficientiam sentiamus.
“A psalm of a song on the day of the Sabbath. It is good to confess to the Lord and to sing psalms to your name, O Most High,” and the rest. After the times of the law and the knowledge of the truth, it is fitting to look at the body itself rather than at the shadow of the body. For the law contains the image of the things that were to be fulfilled in our Lord Jesus Christ; not the truth itself, but in it a meditation on the truth, useful by faith rather than by effect, by imitation rather than by kind. For the things commanded to be observed were not useful by the power of their own efficacy, but saving by the faith of those who observed them: such as the various sacrifices, the rites of burnt offerings, the care of circumcision, and the rest of the Sabbath. For all these both carried guilt when neglected and profited when done in faith in things to come, as the blessed apostle says: “Before faith came, we were kept shut up under the law for that faith which was beginning to be revealed. So the law became our tutor in Christ, that we might be justified by faith. But when faith came, we are no longer under the tutor; for you are all sons of faith.” So whenever anything from the law is read again, a mirror of things to come is to be seen in the performance of the commandments then present. It would indeed have been fitting to give an account of each of the things listed above, so that, according to the apostle’s teaching, all might be understood to have profited by faith in things to come rather than by the power of their own efficacy; yet, lest all gathered into one should bring the hearers a burden rather than knowledge, let us take up again one of the parts listed above, namely the one necessary for the occasion, that is, the Sabbath day; because the psalm is titled “A psalm of a song on the day of the Sabbath”: so that, when we have learned through the authority of the heavenly Scriptures what meaning is contained in the rest of the Sabbath, we may perceive the like efficacy of the other things in the law.
91.2CSEL 22:346–347
Et de otio quidem diei huius multa praecepta sunt. nam et in ea dominus perfecta mundi huius soliditate requieuit; scriptum est enim: et requieuit deus in die septima ab omnibus operibus suis, quae inchoauit facere. et rursum haec eadem sanctificatur in lege ab eo, ut omne opus agi uetitum sit, sicut scribitur in Exodo: in mente habete diem sabbatorum sanctificare eum: sex diebus operaberis et facies omnia opera tua; septimo autem die sabbata domini dei tui: non facies in illo die ullum opus. ergo sabbato et quies dei est et hominum otium. sed quid hoc proficiet ad psalmum, in quo in factura dei gaudium est, et profundae cogitationes eius. et exurendus peccator ut fenum, et iustus ut palma florescens et multiplicandus ut cedrus? nulla hic diei septimi requies, nullum humanorum operum otium decantatur. ergo quia nihil in psalmo de requie huius sabbati continetur, proprietas requietionis et sabbati, quod in lege praescribitur, requirenda est in psalmis. legimus itaque de impiis dictum: sicut iuraui in ira mea, si intrabunt in requiem meam. deus in sacramenti religione confirmat, non adituros requiem suam; non, ut opinor, huius sabbati requiem significat, in qua post mundi aedificationem scribitur quieuisse. nam sollemnitatem ac laetitiam diei huius omnes Iudaei in eam gloriantes introeunt, ei quibus necesse est plures in peccatis agere ac uiuere: hanc enim diem ad quoddam testimonium dignationis in se dei honorant. si haec ergo dei est requietionis dies, quod cum uenia dictum sit, iam deus mendax est, cum in se contumaces, in filium parricidae requiem diei huius obtineant.
There are many precepts about the rest of this day. For on it the Lord rested when the firmness of this world was completed; for it is written: “And God rested on the seventh day from all his works which he had begun to make.” And again this same day is sanctified by him in the law, so that all work is forbidden, as is written in Exodus: “Remember the Sabbath day, to sanctify it. Six days you shall work and do all your works; but the seventh day is the Sabbath of the Lord your God: you shall do no work on that day.” So the Sabbath is both God’s rest and men’s leisure. But how will this help with the psalm, in which there is joy in the making of God and in his deep thoughts, and the sinner is to be burned like hay, and the righteous is to flourish like the palm and be multiplied like the cedar? No rest of the seventh day, no leisure from human works, is sung here. So, since the psalm contains nothing about the rest of this Sabbath, the proper meaning of the resting and Sabbath prescribed in the law is to be sought in the psalms. We read, then, said of the impious: “As I swore in my anger, they shall not enter into my rest.” God confirms by the solemnity of an oath that they will not enter his rest; he does not, I think, mean the rest of this Sabbath, on which he is written to have rested after the building of the world. For all the Jews enter into the solemnity and joy of this day, glorying in it, even those many who must live and act in sins; for they honor this day as a kind of testimony of God’s favor toward them. If, then, this is God’s day of rest (let it be said with pardon), God is now a liar, since those who are stubborn toward him and murderers of his Son possess the rest of this day.
91.3CSEL 22:347
Dehinc cum omnibus omnino sine exceptione aliqua nihil operis agere. sed in otio quiescere iussum sit, quomodo rursum dominus sabbatum soluit dicens: nescitis, quia sacerdotes in templo sabbatum uiolant et sine crimine sunt? ergo non haec quies sabbati nec hoc eius est otium, cum quando non quiescentes in sabbato maledicti sint * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * sub legem firmitatis accipiens. si sol signaque cetera cursus suos obeunt et habent ab eo permanendi in his, in quibus sunt, substantiam, a quo in hos cursus atque in haec officia conposita sunt, si terra fructus suos profert materiem fecunditatis in dies sumens, per quam ei secundum temporum uices quaedam fertilitatis natura subiecta est, si cotidie animarum origines et corporum figurationes occulta et incognita nobis diuinae uirtutis molitione procedunt: et magnum est muneris tanti dona sentire. cum tamen eorum institutio nesciatur. sed haec etsi opus dei sunt, uerum in his labor nullus est. et quamquam habeant ex auctore suo ac dominante, quod talia sunt, non tamen eum, a quo orta et per quem cotidie talia sunt. defatigant.
Next, since all without any exception were commanded to do no work but to rest in leisure, how then did the Lord break the Sabbath, saying: “Do you not know that the priests in the temple violate the Sabbath and are without guilt?” This, then, is not the rest of the Sabbath, nor is this its leisure, since those who did not rest on the Sabbath would be accursed … receiving under a law of stability. If the sun and the other signs go through their courses and have, from him by whom they were arranged in these courses and these tasks, the substance to remain in what they are; if the earth brings forth its fruits, taking day by day the material of fruitfulness, through which a certain nature of fertility is subjected to it according to the turns of the seasons; if daily the origins of souls and the shaping of bodies proceed by the working of divine power hidden and unknown to us: it is a great thing to perceive the gifts of so great a bounty, though how they were established is not known. But although these are the work of God, there is no labor in them. And although they have from their author and ruler that they are such, yet they do not weary him from whom they arose and through whom they are such daily.
91.4CSEL 22:347–349
Et haec quidem magna dei opera sunt, caelum continere, solem cum astris ceteris luminare, sementis terrae incrementa sufficere, hominem firmare, animam reprouehere: sed longe his maiora opera perfecta sunt. Moyses enim tantum uisibilium rerum creationes enarrauit rudibus hominum animis, ea ad cognitionem dei proferens, quae possent intellegi et uideri. ut per hanc conspicabilium operum magnitudinem uirtus eius, qui operatus est, cognosceretur et creatoris potestas per creaturae admirationem posset intellegi. sed Paulus, testamenti noui interpres, non iam lactis sed panis cibum ingerens ita de domino tradidit: qui est imago dei, primogenitus omnis creaturae, quia in ipso constituta sunt omnia in caelis et in terra, uisibilia et inuisibilia, siue throni siue dominationes siue principatus siue potestates: omnia in ipso et per ipsum facta sunt, et ipse est ante omnes, et omnia ipsi constant. protrahit ergo nos doctor gentium de cognoscibili materia in inuisibilium intellegentiam et nos ad cognoscendos principatus et potestates et thronos et dominationes de terrenis atque humilibus educit. uerum haec ex nutu dei patris et in caelis et in terra manent atque extiterunt, et licet per filium omnia, tamen a deo omnia. ipse est etenim caput ac principium uniuersorum, et in ipso uniuersa sunt condita, licet postea de thensauris in se conditis secundum arbitrium potestatis aeternae singula quaeque pro:ulerit. uerum cum in omnibus Christus operetur, eius tamen opus est, qui operatur in Christo; et ideo. pater meus, ait, cotidie operatur, et ego operor, quia opus patris est, quidquid manente in se deo patre filius dei deus Christus operatur; atque ita per filium cotidie omnia, quia omnia pater operatur in filio. igitur cotidie Christus operatur: et, ut arbitror, animarum initia, configurationes corporum. profectus et incrementum uiuentium opus eius ostendunt.
These are indeed great works of God: to hold the heavens together, to light the sun with the other stars, to supply the growth of the earth’s seed, to strengthen man, to bring back the soul. But works far greater than these have been accomplished. For Moses recounted only the creation of visible things to the untrained minds of men, setting forth for the knowledge of God things that could be understood and seen, so that through the greatness of these visible works the power of him who worked them might be known and the might of the Creator understood through wonder at the creation. But Paul, the interpreter of the New Testament, giving now the food not of milk but of bread, handed down about the Lord thus: “who is the image of God, the firstborn of all creation, because in him were established all things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or principalities or powers: all things were made in him and through him, and he is before all, and all things hold together in him.” The teacher of the Gentiles, then, draws us from knowable matter to the understanding of invisible things, and leads us up from earthly and lowly things to know principalities, powers, thrones, and dominions. But these remain and came to be both in heaven and on earth at the nod of God the Father; and though all things are through the Son, yet all things are from God. For he is the head and beginning of all things, and in him all things were stored up, though afterward he brought out each thing from the treasuries stored in himself according to the decision of eternal power. But though Christ works in all things, yet it is the work of him who works in Christ; and therefore he says: “My Father works daily, and I work,” because whatever God the Son of God, Christ, works, God the Father remaining in himself, is the work of the Father; and so all things are daily through the Son, because the Father works all things in the Son. Christ, then, works daily; and, as I think, the beginnings of souls, the shaping of bodies, and the progress and growth of living things show his work.
91.5CSEL 22:349–350
Ut autem absolutius intellegere possimus, quae operatio dei sit et quomodo operans pater operatur et filius. originem dicti huius nosse debemus. inter ceteras enim curationes, quibus se dominus in carne hominis deum docebat sub uisibili materie potestatem inuisibilis uirtutis ostendens, paralyticum triginta et octo annorum in natatoria porticus Salomonis inuenit expectantem alicuius auxilium, per quem ad motum aquae per angelum incitatae deuehi posset. erat autem hoc et in tempore et in homine uirtutis, ut, cum fons piscinae commotus esset, ille, qui primus aquas esset ingressus, omnem infirmitatem, qua adflictaretur, euaderet. erant autem haec et praesentium effectibus utilia et futurorum speculo imaginata, cum angelo ad aquas uocante omnium aegritudinum prompta esset abolitio. hunc ergo paralyticum die sabbati dominus ubi uidit, uerbo curat, praecepto salutem infirmantis efficiens. dicit ergo paralytico: surge et tolle grabatum tuum et ambula. iam non solum sanus paralyticus, sed etiam oneri utilis factus est. Iudaei paralyticum uiolati sabbati arguunt dicentes: sabbatum est et non licet tibi tollere grabatum tuum. quibus respondit: qui me fecit sanum, ille mihi dixit: tolle grabatum tuum et ambula, eundem auctorem facti sui praeferens, quem salutis, ut non existimaretur ab eo culpa uiolati sabbati posse proficisci, cuius in uerbo humani corporis instauratio constitisset. ergo quia paralyticum dominus curasset in sabbato, ubi facti ueneratio consequi debuisset, illic Iudaeorum omnium odium commouetur. quibus dominus respondit: pater meus usque modo operatur. et ego operor.
But so that we may understand more fully what the working of God is and how the Father works and the Son works, we must know the origin of this saying. Among the other healings by which the Lord taught that he was God in the flesh of a man, showing the might of invisible power under visible matter, he found in the pool of Solomon’s porch a man paralyzed for thirty-eight years, waiting for someone’s help by which he might be carried down at the moving of the water stirred by an angel. There was this power, both of time and of person, that when the spring of the pool was stirred, the one who first entered the waters escaped every weakness by which he was afflicted. These things were both useful in their present effects and imaged as a mirror of the future, since, when the angel called to the waters, the abolition of all sicknesses was ready. When the Lord saw this paralytic on the Sabbath day, he healed him by a word, accomplishing the sick man’s health by a command. So he says to the paralytic: “Rise, take up your bed, and walk.” Now the paralytic was not only well but even made useful for a burden. The Jews accuse the paralytic of violating the Sabbath, saying: “It is the Sabbath, and it is not lawful for you to take up your bed.” He answered them: “He who made me well said to me: Take up your bed and walk,” putting forward the same author of his deed as of his health, so that the guilt of violating the Sabbath might not be thought able to proceed from him by whose word the restoration of a human body had come about. So, because the Lord had healed the paralytic on the Sabbath, where veneration of the deed ought to have followed, there the hatred of all the Jews was stirred up. The Lord answered them: “My Father works until now, and I work.”
91.6CSEL 22:350
Sed' surgit hic ad uiolati, ut putabant. sabbati grauior indignatio, quod patrem suum deum dixerit, aequalem se faciens deo. sed unde hic Iudaeis dolor est? non enim ita locutus est: deus pater meus est. sed uim adtulit ueritas, et confessionem inuitis ratio extorsit; deo enim esse aequalem opera loquebantur. illi irascuntur quae non audiunt, et pati nolunt quod ignorare non possunt: et hoc in Christo oderunt, quod eos intellegere est necesse. opus ergo patris in quo est? in eo scilicet, quod agit filius; ait enim: non potest filius facere a se quicquam. nisi quod uiderit patrem facientem. non utique sibi uirtutem ademit. sed obsequio paterno deuinxit arbitrio. non enim nudo sermone significat: non potest filius facere, sed adiecit: a se quicquam, nisi quod uiderit patrem facientem. ergo omne, quod facit ille, famulatus est, quia non a se quicquam, sed id, quod uiderit, facit: ministerium ueniens de exemplo non operis, sed uoluntatis, quia opus patris in uoluntate est. id enim dominus ait: non ueni uoluntatem meam facere, sed eius, qui me misit, docens non aliud uelle se quam quod uellet ille, qui eum miserat. ergo uoluntatem patris filius tamquam exemplum operationis introspicit, quia omnia intra paternarum cogitationum prouidentiam quadam futurarum rerum praedestinatione formantur. introspicit autem per mutuam caritatem atque naturam; ait enim: pater diligit filium et omnia demonstrat ei. quae ipse facit. ita et huic dei, ex quo ipse deus natus est, uoluntatem nosse peruium est: et illi, quod uoluntatis suae cognitionem filio congenuerit, est benignum.
But here a heavier indignation arises over the Sabbath violated, as they thought, because he called God his Father, making himself equal to God. But why is this a grief to the Jews? For he did not speak thus: “God is my Father.” But the truth applied force, and reason wrung confession from the unwilling; for his works declared that he was equal to God. They are angry at what they do not hear, and they refuse to endure what they cannot be ignorant of; and in Christ they hate this, that they are compelled to understand. Where, then, is the work of the Father? In what the Son does, namely; for he says: “The Son can do nothing of himself except what he sees the Father doing.” He certainly did not take away his own power, but bound it in obedience to the Father’s will. For he does not say with bare words, “the Son cannot do,” but added: “anything of himself, except what he sees the Father doing.” So everything that he does is service, because he does nothing of himself but what he sees: a ministry coming from the example not of a work but of a will, because the work of the Father lies in his will. For the Lord says this: “I came not to do my own will but the will of him who sent me,” teaching that he wills nothing other than what he who sent him wills. So the Son looks into the Father’s will as the example of working, because all things are formed within the foresight of the Father’s thoughts by a kind of predestination of things to come. He looks into it through mutual love and nature; for he says: “The Father loves the Son and shows him all things that he himself does.” So it is open to him to know the will of God, from whom he was born God; and it is kind of the Father to have begotten together with the Son the knowledge of his will.
91.7CSEL 22:350–351
Ergo ad sabbati diem, ex quo odium commouebatur, responsum est: pater meus usque modo operatur. et ego operor. est ergo opus dei sabbato? est plane: nam nisi esset, caelum dilaberetur, lumen solis occideret, terra non staret, fructuum omnium incrementa deficerent: uitae hominum interirent, si sabbati lege uirtutum omnium constitutio otiaretur. sed requies nulla est, et cursus idem est, et, ut sex diebus, ita et sabbato elementorum omnium continentur officia. ergo omni in tempore per haec pater operatur; operatur autem in filio, qui ex eo est et per quem omnia haec opus eius sunt, qui ista in se operetur, operantem: et ministerii opus in opus refertur auctoris. itaque filius in paralytico, ut in ceteris, operatus in sabbato est, et per filium opus patris in sabbato est; atque ita non est in die dei requies. cum dies deo nulla sine opere sit.
So to the Sabbath day, from which the hatred was stirred up, the answer was given: “My Father works until now, and I work.” Is there, then, a work of God on the Sabbath? There plainly is. For if there were not, the heavens would fall apart, the light of the sun would set, the earth would not stand, the growth of all fruits would fail, and the lives of men would perish, if by the law of the Sabbath the ordering of all powers took a holiday. But there is no rest, the course is the same, and the offices of all the elements are maintained on the Sabbath as on the six days. So at all times the Father works through these things; and he works in the Son, who is from him and through whom all these things are his work, the Son working them, as the Father works in him; and the work of the ministry is referred to the work of the author. So the Son worked in the paralytic on the Sabbath, as in other things, and through the Son the work of the Father is on the Sabbath; and so there is no rest in the day of God, since no day is without work for God.
91.8CSEL 22:351–352
Quia ergo opera dei exstant, quae sit eius requies quaerenda est. dei itaque opus, opus Christi est; uerum et requies dei deus Christus est, quia ita omnia, quae dei sunt, in eo uera sunt, ut his pater quiescat. perfectus enim a perfecto est, quia, ut apostolus ait, omnia ipsi constant, et sicut de se ipse testatus est: sicut habet pater uitam in semetipso, ita et filio dedit habere uitam in semetipso; et rursum apostolus ait: quia in ipso inhabitat omnis plenitudo diuinitatis corporaliter. itaque quod in eo est uel quod ipso perfectum est, neque iam, quod subsistit ac manet, eget atque expectat aliunde, sed caritate patris atque uirtute. ita et in filio uita est, ut, licet sit natus ex patre, tamen in ea uita, in qua et pater uiuit, existat. nam et in eo uniuersorum, quae deinceps crearentur, principia constiterunt; et in eo uniuersa contemplans consummatis per eum omnibus delectatus est, cum et in filio creatore quiesceret et in his, quae digna dilectionis filio essent creata, gauderet. hinc illud est in prouerbiis: cum pararet caelum, aderam illi et: ego eram apud eum disponens: mihi adgaudebat, cum laetaretur orbe perfecto. haec requies, in qua laetatur pater, quam etiam per sacramenti confirmationem impii non adibunt. est etiam intellegenda domino Iesu Christo requies eorum, quae inuisibilia sunt, tbroni, dominatus, principatus, potestates: haec enim omnia manent incorrupta, indefessa, perpetua. et idcirco in his requies existimanda est, quia indulta aeternitate iam in eorum perfectis creationibus quiescatur.
Since, then, the works of God exist, we must ask what his rest is. The work of God, then, is the work of Christ; but the rest of God too is God Christ, because all things that are God’s are so truly in him that the Father rests in them. For he is perfect from the perfect, because, as the apostle says, “all things hold together in him,” and as he himself testified of himself: “As the Father has life in himself, so he has given to the Son to have life in himself”; and again the apostle says: “For in him dwells all the fullness of divinity bodily.” So what is in him, or what is perfected by him, neither needs nor awaits from elsewhere what subsists and remains, but has it by the love and power of the Father. So life is also in the Son in such a way that, though he is born from the Father, he exists in that life in which the Father also lives. For in him too the beginnings of all things that would afterward be created were established; and contemplating all things in him, the Father was delighted when all things had been completed through him, since he both rested in the Son, the Creator, and rejoiced in the things that had been created worthy of the Son’s love. Hence that saying in Proverbs: “When he prepared the heavens, I was present with him,” and: “I was with him arranging; he rejoiced in me when he was glad over the completed world.” This is the rest in which the Father rejoices, which the impious will not enter, as confirmed even by an oath. The rest of the Lord Jesus Christ is also to be understood as that of invisible things, thrones, dominions, principalities, powers: for all these remain incorrupt, unwearied, everlasting. And therefore rest is to be thought of in them, because, eternity having been granted, rest is taken in their completed creations.
91.9CSEL 22:352–353
Oportet autem cognosci quidem, quomodo in requiem, quam impii non adibunt, pii et deo subiecti poterunt introire; necesse est enim spem, quae malis negata sit, bonis relinqui. sed si Christus dei requies est, ergo hi, qui in Christo erant, erunt in dei requie. in Christo autem uelle esse se apostolus clamat dicens: sequor autem, si adprehendam, in quo et adprehensus sum, et rursum: omnia autem detrimenta esse duxi et arbitror stercora, ut Christum lucrifaciam, et rursum: benedictus pater domini nostri Iesu Christi, qui benedixit nos in omni benedictione spiritali in caelestibus in Christo, in quo elegit nos ante mundi constitutionem in ipso. ut simus sancti et inmaculati in conspectu eius in caritate: qui ante praedestinauit nos in adoptionem per Iesum in ipso: quia uerbum caro factum est,quia. cum aliquando essemus alienati et inimici sensus eius in factis malis, nunc autem reconciliati sumus corpore carnis eius. ergo per coniunctionem carnis adsumptae sumus in Christo: et hoc est sacramentum dei absconditum a saeculis et generationibus in deo, quod nunc reuelatum est sanctis eius, esse nos coheredes et concorporales et conparticipes pollicitationis eius in Christo. patet ergo uniuersis per coniunctionem carnis aditus in Christo, si exuant ueterem hominem et cruci eius adfigant, et ab his, quae ante gesserunt, in baptismo eius consepeliantur ad uitam, et, ut in consortium Christi carnis introeant, carnem cum uitiis et concupiscentiis adfigant. istius modi enim corpora configurabit in transformationem corporis sui et horum humilitatem in gloriam carnis suae transferet, qui contundentes omnes cupiditatum aculeos et uoluptatum sordes abluentes post nouae natiuitatis sacramentum meminerint se non carnem suam habere, sed Christi.
We must know, however, how the godly and those subject to God will be able to enter into the rest that the impious will not enter; for the hope denied to the wicked must be left to the good. But if Christ is God’s rest, then those who were in Christ will be in God’s rest. The apostle cries out that he wishes to be in Christ, saying: “But I press on, if I may lay hold of that for which I also was laid hold of,” and again: “I counted all things loss and consider them dung, that I may gain Christ,” and again: “Blessed be the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places in Christ, in whom he chose us before the foundation of the world in himself, that we should be holy and spotless in his sight in love; who predestined us to adoption through Jesus in himself”: because the Word became flesh; because, “when we were once alienated and enemies in mind in evil deeds, now we have been reconciled in the body of his flesh.” So through the joining of the flesh he assumed we are in Christ; and this is the mystery of God hidden from the ages and generations in God, which has now been revealed to his saints: that we are fellow heirs, of the same body, and partakers of his promise in Christ. Access in Christ, then, lies open to all through the joining of the flesh, if they put off the old man and nail it to his cross, are buried with him in his baptism away from what they did before, to life, and, so that they may enter into the fellowship of Christ’s flesh, crucify the flesh with its vices and lusts. For he will conform such bodies to the transformation of his own body and will carry their lowliness over into the glory of his flesh, those who, crushing all the stings of desires and washing away the filth of pleasures, remember after the mystery of the new birth that they have not their own flesh but Christ’s.
91.10CSEL 22:353–354
Est autem hoc perfectum sabbatum, haec uera requies, cui more sabbati saecularis omnia uitae necessaria pridie praeparare praecipimur. Iudaei enim secundum praeceptum legis die, quae anterior sabbato erit, omnia, quae sabbato sint necessaria, parant, et cibus omnis ac potus ante prouidendus, parandus, recondendus est, non intellegentes in eo umbram futurae ueritatis ostendi. ut enim ad otium sabbati obtinendum superioris diei geminanda officia sunt — nam et quod ipsi diei et sabbato necessarium sit, curandum est —, ita et nobis aeterna sabbata expectantibus, quibus illic possimus uti, praesentis uitae negotiis sunt praeparanda, et nunc quidem necessaria, sed requiem sabbati redemptura. ut igitur ab huius sabbati requie, id est, ut superius ostendimus, a consortio Christi angelorumque, non etiam sacramento dei arceamur, operandum et promerendum est, et per sollicitudinem operum anteriorum aeternitatis est requies praeparanda orationum uigiliis, lectionum frequentia, ieiunii uoluntate, humilitatis tranquillitate, bonitatis operibus, castitatis nitore, uirtute patientiae. haec pridie in otium aeterni sabbati sunt paranda, ut corruptionis nostrae infirmitate in caelestem gloriam transformata nec uitium uoluntas, nec ambitio gloriam, nec honorem superbia, nec otium labor, nec cibum corpus, nec somnum noctis die lassitudo desideret, sed sit nobis aeterna lux, uita peruigil, communis usus bonorum, caelestis satiatus sermo dei, laudium deo et cum angelorum choris hymnus aeternus. hoc fidei est praemium, haec corporeae resurrectionis est gloria, in qua nihil desiderandum est, quia nullo egendum est: non per inuidiam aemulandum, quia in communione uiuendum; non aut infirmitate aliqua dolendum aut aetate crescendum, quia inmortalitate durandum est. sed urendus potius diabolus et malum omne perimendum et aeternitatis nostrae flos optinendus. pro huius igitur sabbati requie deo patri filius confitetur. hoc ex persona eius in fine cantatur. hoc, sicuti singulorum uersuum interpretatione noscemus, adquisita hominum inmortalitate celebratur.
This is the perfect Sabbath, this the true rest, for which, after the manner of the worldly Sabbath, we are commanded to prepare all the necessities of life on the day before. For the Jews, according to the precept of the law, prepare on the day before the Sabbath all that is needed on the Sabbath, and all food and drink must be provided, prepared, and stored beforehand, not understanding that in this the shadow of future truth is shown. For just as, to obtain the leisure of the Sabbath, the duties of the previous day must be doubled (for what is needed both for that day and for the Sabbath must be seen to), so for us too, awaiting the eternal Sabbaths, the things we may use there must be prepared by the business of the present life, necessary now indeed, but such as will purchase the rest of the Sabbath. So that we may not be shut out from the rest of this Sabbath, that is, as we showed above, from the fellowship of Christ and the angels, as by God’s oath too, we must work and earn it, and the rest of eternity must be prepared by the diligence of earlier works: by vigils of prayer, frequent reading, willing fasting, calm humility, works of goodness, the brightness of chastity, and the strength of patience. These are to be prepared on the day before, for the leisure of the eternal Sabbath, so that, when the weakness of our corruption has been transformed into heavenly glory, the will may desire no vice, ambition no glory, pride no honor, toil no leisure, the body no food, weariness no sleep of night by day; but there may be for us eternal light, watchful life, the common use of good things, being filled with the heavenly word of God, and an eternal hymn of praise to God with the choirs of angels. This is the reward of faith, this the glory of bodily resurrection, in which nothing is to be desired, because nothing will be lacking; there will be no rivalry through envy, because we will live in communion; no grieving from any weakness or growing with age, because we will endure in immortality. Rather, the devil is to be burned, all evil destroyed, and the flower of our eternity obtained. For the rest of this Sabbath, then, the Son confesses to God the Father. This is sung in his person to the end. This, as we shall learn from the interpretation of each verse, is celebrated, now that immortality has been gained for men.
Tractates 118, chapter 0
118.0.1CSEL 22:354–355
PSALMUS CXVIII. Qui ad doctrinam rationabilis et perfectae prudentiae praeparantur, ab ipsis statim elementis litterarum docendi sunt, ut perfectam ueramque rationem tamquam ab exordio primae institutionis consequantur. sciens istud sanctus Paulus apostolus, eam solam ueram atque utilis doctrinae esse prudentiam, quae ab aetatis initiis atque ab infantiae ipsius inchoaretur exordiis, haec ad Timotheum inter magna atque praeclara fidei studiique praeconia in secunda epistula scribit: tu uero permane in his, quae didicisti et credidisti, sciens, a quibus didiceris, et quod ab infantia sacras litteras nosti, quae te possint instruere in salutem. hoc propter praesentem psalmum ita dictum sit, in quo, cum cognitio ueritatis ad eruditionem humanae ignorantiae esset edenda, per ipsa litterarum atque elementorum initia doctrinae ordo est distributus, secundum enim Hebraeorum litteras in singulis octonis uersibus singulae litterae praeferuntur. est autem omnis numerus uersuum in centum septuaginta sex uersibus. nam cum ex uiginti duabus litteris omnis hebraeus sermo conueniat et octonos uersus litterae singulae explicent, numerus iste uersuum octonis partibus multiplicatus expletur. hanc igitur extitisse centum existimo, ut per litteras totius istius psalmi ordo decurrat: ut, sicut paruuli et inperiti et ad legendum inbuendi haec primum, per quae sibi uerba contexta sunt, litterarum elementa cognoscerent, ita et humana ignoratio ad mores, ad disciplinam, ad cognitionem dei per hanc singularum litterarum octonarium numerum ipsis uelut infantilis doctrinae initiis erudiretur.
Psalm 118. Those who are being prepared for instruction in reasoned and complete understanding must be taught from the very elements of letters, so that they may attain complete and true reason as it were from the starting point of their first training. Holy Paul the apostle knew this: that the only true and useful understanding in teaching is the one begun from the first years of life and from the very beginnings of infancy. So among the great and splendid commendations of faith and zeal he writes to Timothy in his second letter: "But you, remain in the things you have learned and believed, knowing from whom you learned them, and that from infancy you have known the sacred writings, which can instruct you for salvation." Let this be said on account of the present psalm, in which, since the knowledge of truth was to be set forth for the instruction of human ignorance, the order of teaching is laid out through the very beginnings of letters and elements; for following the letters of the Hebrews, one letter stands at the head of each group of eight verses. The whole number of verses is one hundred and seventy-six. For since the whole Hebrew language is made up of twenty-two letters, and each letter unfolds eight verses, this number of verses is reached by multiplying by eight. I think this was the reason for it, that the order of this whole psalm should run through the letters: so that, just as small children, untaught and needing to be trained to read, first learn the elements of letters from which words are put together, so human ignorance too might be trained in conduct, in discipline, and in the knowledge of God through this eightfold number of the individual letters, as through the first beginnings of a child's schooling.
118.0.2CSEL 22:355–356
Arduum enim et difficillimum homini est, per se ipsum uel per saeculi doctores rationem praeceptorum caelestium consequi; nec naturae nostrae recipit infirmitas diuinis institutis, nisi per eius gratiam, qui haec ipsa dederit, erudiri. namque qui simpliciter ea, quae inter manus sibi inciderint, legunt, existimant nihil differentiae in uerbis, nihil in nominibus, nihil in rebus existere. sed si istud communis conloquii sermo non patitur, ut sub diuersis rerum nuncupationibus non diuersa significata esse intellegantur, numquid dei eloquia tam inperita et tam confusa esse credemus, ut aut inopia uerborum, quibus uterentur, laborauerint aut distinctionum genera nescierint?
For it is hard and most difficult for a human being to attain the reason of the heavenly precepts by himself or through the teachers of this world; nor does the weakness of our nature allow us to be trained in divine ordinances except through the grace of him who gave them. Those who simply read whatever comes to hand think that there is no difference in the words, none in the names, none in the things. But if even the speech of ordinary conversation does not allow different meanings not to be understood under different names for things, shall we believe that the words of God are so unskilled and so confused that they either suffered from a lack of words to use, or did not know the kinds of distinctions?
118.0.3CSEL 22:356–357
Plures enim cum audiunt legem, iustificationem, praecepta, testimonia, iudicia, quae omnia Moyses sub diuersa uniuscuiusque generis uirtute disposuit, unum atque idem esse existiment: ignorantes aliud legem, aliud iustificationem, aliud praeceptum, aliud testimonium, aliud esse iudicium; quae multum a se differre et discrepare, testis nobis est octauus decimus psalmus. quo continetur proprietas uniuscuiusque et nuncupationis et generis. lex enim domini inmaculata, conuertens animam. testimonium domini fidele, erudiens paruulos. iustitiae domini rectae, laetificantes corda. praeceptum domini lucidum, inluminans oculos. timor domini sanctus, permanens in saeculum saeculi. iudicia domini uera, iustificata in ipsum. sunt ergo distantiae in singulis quibusque rebus et prudentis atque intellegentis uiri est in his, quae scripta sunt, discernere, - ubi lex, ubi praeceptum, ubi testimonia, ubi iustificationes, ubi iudicia constituta sint: ne illa, quae sermo propheticus mirabili uniuscuiusque rei proprietate distinxit, ea ignorantiae nostrae infirmitas indocta inperitiae opinione confundat. itaque per litteras singulas haec omnia maximus et ultra ceteros copiosissimus psalmus iste discreuit, ut per haec uerborum elementa credendi et uiuendi et erudiendi in deum doctrinae ratio et distinctio doceretur.
For many, when they hear "law," "justification," "precepts," "testimonies," "judgments," all of which Moses arranged under the distinct force of each kind, think them one and the same thing, not knowing that the law is one thing, justification another, a precept another, a testimony another, and a judgment another. That these differ and diverge greatly from one another, the eighteenth psalm is our witness, in which the proper character both of each name and of each kind is contained: "The law of the Lord is spotless, converting the soul; the testimony of the Lord is faithful, instructing little ones; the righteous acts of the Lord are right, gladdening hearts; the precept of the Lord is bright, enlightening the eyes; the fear of the Lord is holy, abiding for ever and ever; the judgments of the Lord are true, justified in themselves." So there are differences between each of these things, and it belongs to a prudent and understanding man to distinguish in what is written where the law, where a precept, where testimonies, where justifications, and where judgments are set: lest the untaught weakness of our ignorance, by an unskilled opinion, confuse what the prophetic word has distinguished by the wonderful proper character of each thing. And so this psalm, the greatest and far richer than the rest, has distinguished all these through the individual letters, so that through these elements of words the reason and distinction of the teaching of believing, living, and being trained toward God might be taught.
118.0.4CSEL 22:357
Plures autem arbitrantur simplicitatem fidei ad absolutam aeternitatis spem posse sufficere, tamquam innocentia secundum iudicium saeculi doctrinae caelestis non egeat institutis. et quia aliter se res habet, idcirco nunc uiuendi in deo innocenter et in innocentia religiose manendi cognitio multa cum copia prophetici sermonis exposita est: quia difficile est quemquam per semetipsum, id est per saeculi instituta hanc innocentiae religiosae cognitionem et uerum usum uitae piae et innocentis adipisci. nouit etiam infirmam per se esse humanam naturam apostolus ad hanc uiuendi scientiam capessendam. nam cum de charismatum et munerum dei donis doceret, cum primum sermonem sapientiae praetulisset, statim sermonem scientiae subiecit. hoc enim scientiae post sapientiae sequens a deo donum est, quia usus sapientiae in usu scientiae perfectus est.
Many think that simplicity of faith can suffice for the full hope of eternity, as though innocence by the world's judgment had no need of the ordinances of heavenly teaching. And because the matter stands otherwise, the knowledge of living innocently in God and of remaining devoutly in innocence is set out here at great length in the prophetic word: because it is hard for anyone to gain by himself, that is, through the ordinances of the world, this knowledge of devout innocence and the true practice of a godly and innocent life. The apostle too knew that human nature by itself is weak for grasping this knowledge of how to live. For when he was teaching about the gifts of the charisms and endowments of God, after he had put the word of wisdom first, he at once added the word of knowledge. This is the gift that follows from God after wisdom, because the use of wisdom is made complete in the use of knowledge.
118.0.5CSEL 22:357–358
Occurrit autem in praesenti psalmo etiam ea nobis difficultas, quod, cum duos tantum psalmos acceperimus per litteras hebraeas conscriptos, id est centesimum undecimum atque duodecimum, ita ut a prima usque ad uicesimam et secundam secundum Hebraeos litteram uersuum numerus conueniret uersusque singuli a singulorum elementorum initiis inchoarentur, in hoc nunc psalmo octonos uersus elementa singula obtinerent. sed cum omnia uiuendi, credendi et placendi deo praecepta continerentur in psalmo, in eo numero omnia litterarum initia continentur, qui maxime secundum plenam et religiosam eiusdem numeri uirtutem primus omnium conuenientium in se undique partium aequalitate perfectus est. primum etenim per duas in se partes ex partibus coaequalis, tum deinde per quattuor aeque partes conuenit: ut uirtutes psalmorum, qui in hoc numero uel singulari uel multiplicato conlocati sunt, docent numeri huius esse sanctam et religiosam plenitudinem. hic autem numerus etiam in lege sanctus est. iussum enim est, ut, qui natus esset, in octauo signum circumcisionis acciperet. haec etiam in circumcisione domini ratio seruata est; et in hoc dierum numero, cum ipse circumcisione non egeret, oblatus in templo est, ut in corpore eius humanae carnis recideretur infirmitas. hic etiam numerus omnia genera pecudum, ut digna sacrificiis habeantur, emundat; octaua enim die iubentur offerri. et in hoc numero diluuii diebus origo rursum humanae generationis eligitur. consummatio igitur nunc doctrinae et eruditionis nostrae sub perfecti huius numeri absolutione per singula elementa concluditur, ante quem neque munda deo hostia -fuit, neque in generis familia quis cessante circumcisione susceptus est, et ex quo rursum iterandae generationis coepit exordium. primae igitur litterae hi uersus sunt:
In the present psalm we also meet this difficulty: we have received only two psalms written by the Hebrew letters, namely the hundred and eleventh and hundred and twelfth, in which the number of verses agrees with the letters from the first to the twenty-second according to the Hebrews and each verse begins with one of the letters; but in this psalm each letter holds eight verses. But since all the precepts for living, believing, and pleasing God were contained in the psalm, all the initial letters are contained in that number which, by the full and holy force of that number, is the first of all to be made complete by the equality of the parts that fit together in it from every side. For first it is made up of two equal parts, and then also of four equal parts; and the force of the psalms placed in this number, single or multiplied, shows that the fullness of this number is holy and sacred. This number is also holy in the law. For it was commanded that one who was born should receive the sign of circumcision on the eighth day. This reckoning was kept also in the circumcision of the Lord; and on this number of days, although he himself had no need of circumcision, he was presented in the temple, so that in his body the weakness of human flesh might be cut away. This number also makes every kind of livestock clean, so that they are held worthy of sacrifices; for they are commanded to be offered on the eighth day. And in this number the new beginning of the human race was chosen in the days of the flood. So now the completion of our teaching and instruction is concluded through the individual letters under the fulfillment of this perfect number, before which no victim was clean for God, nor was anyone received into the family of the race while circumcision was lacking, and from which the beginning of a renewed generation began. These, then, are the verses of the first letter:
Tractates 118, chapter 1
118.1.1CSEL 22:358–359
Beati inmaculati in uia, qui ambulant in lege domini. beati, qui scrutant testimonia. eius, in toto corde exquirunt eum. dictorum ordo non neglegendus est; qui si non diligenter a nobis cognoscitur, ne dispositae quidem beatitudinis ordinem consequemur. non enim primum: beati scrutantes testimonia dei, sed primum: beati inmaculati in uia. prius enim est, confirmatis moribus et in innocentiae studium ex communi probitatis honestate conpositis ueritatis uiam ingredi; sequens deinde est, scrutari dei testimonia et expurgato emundatoque animo ad inuestiganda adesse. ordinis autem huius et alius propheta non inmemor est dicens: serite in iustitiam uosmetipsos et metite uos in fructum uitae et inluminate uos in lumine scientiae. non inluminatio primum, sed satio nostra praecepta est, ut, cum antea nosmetipsos, id est uitae nostrae usum in spem fructuum seuerimus, deinde cum, quae sata sunt, messuerimus, tunc nos lumine scientiae inluminemus. tenendus igitur hic ordo est: sationis messis et inluminationis. plures enim nostrum inluminari se prius quam serere ac metere festinant, cum satio atque messis quaedam consequendi luminis praeparatio sit.
"Blessed are the spotless in the way, who walk in the law of the Lord. Blessed are those who search his testimonies; with their whole heart they seek him." The order of the sayings must not be neglected; if we do not learn it carefully, we shall not attain even the order of the blessedness that is laid out. For it does not say first, "Blessed are those who search the testimonies of God," but first, "Blessed are the spotless in the way." For the first thing is to enter the way of truth with conduct made firm and formed for the pursuit of innocence out of the common honesty of uprightness; the next is to search the testimonies of God and to come with a purged and cleansed mind to investigate them. Another prophet too was not forgetful of this order, saying: "Sow yourselves for righteousness, and reap yourselves for the fruit of life, and enlighten yourselves with the light of knowledge." Enlightenment is not commanded first, but our sowing, so that when we have first sown ourselves, that is, the conduct of our life, in hope of fruit, and then have reaped what was sown, we may then enlighten ourselves with the light of knowledge. This order, then, must be kept: of sowing, reaping, and enlightenment. For many of us hurry to be enlightened before sowing and reaping, although sowing and reaping are a kind of preparation for attaining the light.
118.1.2CSEL 22:359–360
Prima igitur haec beatitudo est, beatos esse, qui inmaculati in uia sint: sed non in uia fortuita et in incerta et in erratica, sed in uia, in qua in lege domini ambulatur. plures etenim utilem et necessariam uiam se esse ingressos existimant; sed inmaculati in uia non erunt, quia non in lege domini ambulant. sed uia haec non solum ineunda est, sed etiam peragenda. nemo enim dum in uia est, id. ad quod per uiam tendit, obtinuit; beatus Paulus ait: non quod aliquid acceperim aut iam perfectus sim: sequor autem si adprehendam, in quo et adprehensus sum a Christo. ergo adhuc ille pergebat; sed pergebat ea, quae retro sunt. obliuiscens, his autem, quae in priore sunt, se extendens. itaque uiam hanc agens beatus est, qui cum obliuione praeteritorum in futurorum spem extenditur. et quae uia sit, in qua unusquisque ambulans beatus sit, dominus docet dicens: ego sum uia. quisquis igitur in praeceptis eius institerit, hic beatus est, dum uitia carnis coercet, dum animi petulantiam edomat, dum auaritiae famem uincit, dum terrenorum honorum gloriam euitat. qui in his ergo manserit, hic est inmaculatus in uia et in lege domini ambulans.
This, then, is the first blessedness: that those are blessed who are spotless in the way; but not in a chance way, an uncertain way, a wandering way, but in the way in which one walks in the law of the Lord. For many think they have entered a useful and necessary way; but they will not be spotless in the way, because they do not walk in the law of the Lord. And this way must not only be entered but also travelled to its end. For no one, while he is on the way, has gained what he is heading for by the way. Blessed Paul says: "Not that I have received anything or am already perfect; but I follow on, if I may lay hold of that for which I also have been laid hold of by Christ." So he was still pressing on; but pressing on forgetting the things that are behind and stretching himself out to those that are ahead. And so he who travels this way is blessed, who, forgetting what is past, stretches out in hope of what is to come. And what the way is, in which each one who walks is blessed, the Lord teaches, saying: "I am the way." Whoever, then, stands firm in his precepts is blessed, while he restrains the vices of the flesh, while he tames the insolence of the mind, while he conquers the hunger of greed, while he shuns the glory of earthly honors. Whoever remains in these things is spotless in the way and walking in the law of the Lord.
118.1.3CSEL 22:360
Adiectio autem ea, qua dictum est: in lege domini, non est otiosa. est enim et peccati lex, de qua ait beatus apostolus: uideo aliam legem in membris meis contramilitantem legi mentis meae et captiuum me ducentem in lege peccati. ergo quia et lex peccati esset, idcirco lex domini dicta est. nisi enim et lex esset exterior, non cum adiectione proprietatis legem domini propheticus sermo dixisset.
The addition by which it is said "in the law of the Lord" is not idle. For there is also a law of sin, of which the blessed apostle says: "I see another law in my members warring against the law of my mind and leading me captive in the law of sin." So because there was also a law of sin, it was called the law of the Lord. For unless there were also another law outside, the prophetic word would not have said "the law of the Lord" with the addition of what is proper to it.
118.1.4CSEL 22:360–361
Sequens deinde uersus est primae litterae: beati scrutantes testimonia eius, et in toto corde exquirunt eum. in primo uersu est: qui ambulant in lege domini. in secundo: qui scrutant testimonia eius, in quarto, quia tertius supplementum dedit secundo, de mandatis ait dicens: tu mandasti mandata tua custodiri nimis, in quinto de iustificatione: utinam dirigantur uiae meae ad custodiendas iustificationes tuas, in sexto rursum de mandatorum effectibus: non confundar, cum respicio in mandata tua, in septimo de iudiciis: confitebor tibi, domine, in directione cordis, in eo, quod didici iudicia tua, in octauo de iustificatione: iustificationes tuas custodiam, non me derelinquas usquequaque nimis. si ergo aliud lex, aliud praeceptum, aliud iudicium. aliud iustificatio, aliud testimonium, necessarium est ab eo, qui omnia constituit et condidit, intellegentiae gratiam nos et munus orare. totum hoc autem in commune lex dicitur. sed est quiddam in his speciale, quod propriam in se habet legis.
Then follows the verse of the first letter: "Blessed are those who search his testimonies, and with their whole heart they seek him." In the first verse it says, "who walk in the law of the Lord"; in the second, "who search his testimonies"; in the fourth (since the third completed the second) it speaks of commandments, saying: "You have commanded your commandments to be kept exceedingly"; in the fifth, of justification: "O that my ways may be directed to keep your justifications"; in the sixth again of the effects of the commandments: "I shall not be put to shame when I look to your commandments"; in the seventh, of judgments: "I will confess to you, Lord, in uprightness of heart, in that I have learned your judgments"; in the eighth, of justification: "I will keep your justifications; do not utterly forsake me." If, then, law is one thing, precept another, judgment another, justification another, and testimony another, we must pray to him who established and founded all things for the grace and gift of understanding. All this together is called law; but there is something special in these which holds what is proper to law in itself.
118.1.5CSEL 22:361–362
Quid ergo est lex? umbra scilicet, ut apostolus ait, futurorum; quod de ceteris scriptum nusquam est, ut futurorum umbra sit aut iustificatio, aut testimonia, aut mandata: sed tantum id legi proprium est, ut apostolus in plurimis docet, non secundum litterae intellegentiam legem esse tractandam, sed secundum spiritalem doctrinam futurorum in ea umbram esse noscendam. ait enim: non obturabis os bouis triturantis et adiecit: numquid pecudum deo cura est? an propter nos dicta scriptaque sunt? et rursum: legem legentes non audistis, duos filios habuit, unum ex ancilla et unum ex libera? sed qui ex ancilla, secundum carnem natus est; qui autem ex libera, secundum repromissionem. et quia lex futurorum umbra est, adiecit: quae sunt allegorumena, haec enim sunt duo testamenta. ergo quaecumque doctrinarum spiritalium umbram conplexabunt, haec lex esse dicenda est: quia lex et spiritalis est et umbra est futurorum.
What, then, is the law? A shadow, as the apostle says, of things to come. This is written nowhere of the others, that justification or testimonies or commandments are a shadow of things to come; it is proper to the law alone, as the apostle teaches in many places, that the law is not to be treated according to the understanding of the letter, but that in it, according to spiritual teaching, the shadow of things to come is to be recognized. For he says: "You shall not muzzle the ox that treads out the grain," and adds: "Does God care for cattle? Or were these things said and written for our sake?" And again: "You who read the law, have you not heard? He had two sons, one by the slave woman and one by the free woman. But the one by the slave woman was born according to the flesh; the one by the free woman according to the promise." And because the law is a shadow of things to come, he added: "These things are allegorical; for these are the two covenants." So whatever embraces the shadow of spiritual teachings must be called law: because the law is both spiritual and a shadow of things to come.
118.1.6CSEL 22:362
Mandatum autem domini est, in quo obseruatio et custodia continetur, ut illud: non occides, non moechaberis, et cetera horum similia. et quia haec simplicia et splendida sunt nosque in uerum lumen per obseruantiam suorum dirigentia, idcirco ita dictum est: domini lucidum, inluminans oculos. de lege autem non conuenerat ista dixisse, quia per umbram futurorum sancta est et animas per futurorum cognitionem conuertens; mandatum autem per obseruantiam sui inluminans.
The commandment of the Lord is that in which observance and keeping are contained, such as "You shall not kill, you shall not commit adultery," and the like. And because these are simple and bright and direct us into the true light by their observance, it was said: "The commandment of the Lord is bright, enlightening the eyes." It would not have been fitting to say this of the law, because the law is holy through the shadow of things to come and converts souls through the knowledge of what is to come; but the commandment enlightens through its observance.
118.1.7CSEL 22:362–363
Ergo quia beati sunt scrutantes testimonia dei, et aliud legem, aliud mandatum, aliud testimonia esse sicut cetera diximus, quae haec dei sint testimonia, noscendum est. legis etenim totius liber sub testimoniis datus est. caelum namque et terram Moyses librum testamenti traditurus in testimonium aduocauit. sunt et plurima in causam testimoniorum constituta, cum Iacob ait: testimonium erit uobis collis iste, et testimonium erit lapis iste. et in scriptum est: duodecim lapides ecferte, ut sint hi in testimonium filiis uestris. curato etiam leproso dominus ait: offer munus tuum in testimonium, quod constituit Moyses illis. apostolus plura ad Timotheum per epistulam loquens denuntiat sub testibus dicens: in conspectu multorum testium denuntio tibi et in conspectu dei uiuificantis omnia et Iesu et electorum angelorum, ut custodias. plura igitur et innumerabilia sunt dei testimonia; quae si quis scrutari per cognitionem legis, prophetarum, euangeliorum, apostolorum uellet, in beatitudine permaneret, neque uelut uacuo et solitario orbe uiuens sciret se nisi sub teste peccare. plena sunt enim omnia diuinis testimoniis; et omne hoc, uacuum quod putatur, repletum angelis dei nihilque est, quod non ministeriorum frequentia incolat.
So since those who search the testimonies of God are blessed, and since law is one thing, commandment another, testimonies another, as we said of the rest, we must learn what these testimonies of God are. The whole book of the law was given under testimonies. For when Moses was about to hand over the book of the covenant, he called heaven and earth to witness. Many things too were set up as testimonies, as when Jacob says: "This hill shall be a testimony to you, and this stone shall be a testimony." And in Joshua it is written: "Bring out twelve stones, that they may be a testimony to your sons." When the leper was cured the Lord said: "Offer your gift for a testimony, as Moses commanded, to them." The apostle, saying much to Timothy by letter, charges him before witnesses: "In the sight of many witnesses I charge you, and in the sight of God who gives life to all things and of Jesus and of the elect angels, that you keep these things." Many, then, and countless are the testimonies of God; if anyone would search them through the knowledge of the law, the prophets, the gospels, and the apostles, he would remain in blessedness, and he would not live as in an empty and solitary world, but would know that he sins only before a witness. For all things are full of divine testimonies; and all this which is thought empty is filled with the angels of God, and there is nothing that a multitude of ministering spirits does not inhabit.
118.1.8CSEL 22:363–364
Horum itaque cognitionem per doctrinam quis adeptus scit se sub testibus uiuere. et cum natura humanae infirmitatis ad uitia est, refugit tamen uel sub teste peccare: quod ipsum docet nos communis consuetudinis ratio. quis enim sub teste non metuit? quis ad scelus nisi secretum elegit? quis ad adulterium non aut solitudinem aut noctem optauit? et si quando incalescentibus iam ad crimen animis promptum est, tamen furor insanientis uoluptatis occursu testis coercetur, et in sese abruptam humanae naturam nonnumquam intercessio repentina reuocauit. si ergo intercessionis iam animo facinus demoratur, quid Christianum hominem agere conueniet, scientem se tot undique spiritalium uirtutum testimoniis, non dico operum suorum, sed ipsius tantum uoluntatis obsessum? nonne cum in aliquam turbidae adfectionis uoluntatem infirmitatis nostrae aculeis commouemur, metuimus adsistentes undique nobis choros angelorum et plenum ministeriis caelestibus mundum? si enim angeli paruulorum patrem nostrum cotidie uident, qui in caelis est, possumus testimonia eorum metuere, quos et nobiscum manere et deo cotidie scimus adsistere. quin etiam ipsum illum diabolum, per quem ipsa illa uitiorum nostrorum incentiua praebentur, suosque omnes testes metuere debemus, puncto temporis omnem amplitudinem mundi huius obeuntem: cui dulce est peccare nos, ut peccatorum nostrorum testimonio glorietur. est enim eius haec propria calliditas, instigare ad peccandum et arguere peccantes. dictum est enim: aut,?
Whoever has gained the knowledge of these through teaching knows that he lives before witnesses. And although human weakness by nature tends to vice, he still shrinks from sinning before a witness; ordinary custom itself teaches us this. For who does not fear before a witness? Who has not chosen secrecy for a crime? Who has not wished for solitude or night for adultery? And even when minds already burning are ready for the crime, the frenzy of raging pleasure is checked by the arrival of a witness, and a sudden interruption has sometimes called back human nature when it was rushing headlong. If, then, a crime already in the mind is delayed by an interruption, what is it fitting for a Christian to do, who knows that on every side he is besieged by the testimonies of so many spiritual powers, not, I say, to his deeds, but to his very will? When we are stirred by the goads of our weakness toward some desire of troubled feeling, do we not fear the choirs of angels standing around us on every side and the world full of heavenly ministries? For if the angels of the little ones see our Father who is in heaven daily, we can fear the testimonies of those whom we know both to stay with us and to stand before God daily. Indeed, we ought also to fear the devil himself, through whom the very incitements of our vices are supplied, and all his witnesses, who goes round the whole extent of this world in a moment of time: to whom it is sweet that we sin, so that he may glory in the testimony of our sins. For this is his own cunning, to incite to sin and to accuse those who sin. For it is said: …
118.1.9CSEL 22:364–365
Et quia essent hae nobis uirtutes in testimonio cum ceteris permanentes, de sanctis tantum prophetam meminisse dignum fuit dicentem: beati scrutantes testimonia eius, non aliena scilicet, sed illa, quae dei sunt. non neglegentem autem testimoniorum dei oportet esse scrutationem: ob quod dictum est: in toto corde exquirent eum. non pro parte studium caelesti doctrinae adhibendum est, sed toto corde dei testimonia inquirenda sunt, ut, quia sunt et alia, quae dei non sunt, ea, quae dei discimus esse, non auocato in alia negotia corde scrutemur.
And since these powers remain with us as witnesses along with the rest, it was fitting for the prophet to mention only the holy ones, saying: "Blessed are those who search his testimonies": not, that is, others' testimonies, but those that are God's. The searching of God's testimonies must not be careless; that is why it is said: "With their whole heart they will seek him." Zeal for heavenly teaching is not to be applied in part, but God's testimonies are to be sought with the whole heart, so that, since there are also other things which are not God's, we may search what we learn to be God's with a heart not called away to other business.
118.1.10CSEL 22:365–366
: non enim, qui operantur iniquitatem, in uiis eius ambulauerunt. in primo uersu singulariter uia commemoratur, in hoc tertio plures. ex quo intellegendum est, per multas uias ad unam perueniri; in qua quisque inmaculatus si sit, beatus est. de plurimis autem uiis atque una Ieremias paria testatus est dicens: state in uiis et interrogate uias domini et quaerite, quae sit uia bona. in plurimis ergo uiis standum est, et plurimae interrogandae sunt: et quidem plures et domini sunt et, et in his cernendum est, quae sit uia optima. plures sunt et plurima domini mandata, plures prophetae, per quos omnes in unam uiam pergitur: sed in his operarii iniquitatis non ambulauerunt nam si in lege mansissent, usque ad optimam illam noui testamenti uiam. est uia per Moysen, est per Iesum, est per Dauid, est per Esaiam, est per Ieremiam, est per apostolos; et per has omnes necesse est ad eum, qui dixit: ego sum uia et nemo uadit ad patrem. simile quiddam sub margaritae nomine dictum esse intellegendum est. multarum enim margaritarum negotiatorem esse oportet, ut unam margaritam multi pretii consequatur. de margaritis cum fit sermo, sufficit ad honorem earum, quod margaritae sunt; una autem illa margarita, quae reperta est, magni esse pretii dicitur; ita et cum de uiis plurimis prophetatur, quod et domini et aeternales sint, dictum est; cum autem in his uiis quaeritur, quae sit utilis uia, ea, quae reperta est, optima praedicatur. ergo, quamuis uel illae sunt uel margaritae ipso suo nomine honorabiles sunt, in multis uiis standum est, ut bona uia reperiatur, et uendendae omnes margaritae sunt, ut quae multi pretii est reperta, coematur.
"For those who work iniquity have not walked in his ways." In the first verse "way" is mentioned in the singular; in this third verse, many ways. From this we must understand that one arrives at the one way through many ways; and whoever is spotless in it is blessed. Jeremiah testified to the same about many ways and the one way, saying: "Stand in the ways, and ask for the ways of the Lord, and seek which is the good way." So we must stand in many ways, and many must be asked about; and indeed many are the Lord's, and among them we must discern which is the best way. Many are the Lord's commandments, many the prophets, through all of whom one travels into the one way; but in these the workers of iniquity have not walked; for if they had remained in the law, they would have come as far as that best way of the new covenant. There is a way through Moses, through Joshua, through David, through Isaiah, through Jeremiah, through the apostles; and through all these one must come to him who said: "I am the way, and no one goes to the Father" except through me. Something similar must be understood to be said under the name of the pearl. For one must be a merchant of many pearls in order to obtain the one pearl of great price. When pearls are spoken of, it is enough for their honor that they are pearls; but the one pearl that was found is said to be of great price. So too when the many ways are prophesied, it is said that they are both the Lord's and eternal; but when one asks among these ways which is the useful way, the one that was found is proclaimed the best. So, although those ways exist and the pearls are honorable by their very name, we must stand in many ways in order to find the good way, and all the pearls must be sold in order to buy the one of great price that was found.
118.1.11CSEL 22:366
Dehinc consequitur hic uersus: tu mandasti mandata tua custodiri nimis. superius commemorauimus aliud significare mandata, aliud legem. et de lege, quantum arbitror, apostolus nobis testis fuit, quia umbra sit futurorum, in qua species ueritatis tamquam corpus in umbra describitur. mandatum uero est, quod per obseruantiam inplendum est; ut illud: non moechaberis, non occides. non enim in eo species futurae imaginis continetur, sed praesentem habet operationis effectum: tu mandasti mandata tua custodiri ualde. nihil igitur dissoluto animo, nihil incurioso agendum est, sed sollicitos atque anxios curam mandatorum dei exsequi nos oportet, ut id, quod agimus, in profectum fidei nostrae cura reuerentia eius, cui agimus, exsequamur. ceterum si aliquid remissa uoluntate et occupata in res alias cogitatione egerimus. officia quidem corporis in agendo occupabuntur, sed deuotionis meritum per neglegentiam non consequemur.
Then follows this verse: "You have commanded your commandments to be kept exceedingly." We mentioned above that commandments mean one thing and law another. Concerning the law, as I think, the apostle was our witness that it is a shadow of things to come, in which the form of the truth is outlined like a body in its shadow. But a commandment is what is to be fulfilled by observance, such as: "You shall not commit adultery, you shall not kill." For in it there is no form of a future image; it has the present effect of action: "You have commanded your commandments to be kept exceedingly." Nothing, then, is to be done with a slack or careless mind; we must carry out the care of God's commandments anxiously and earnestly, so that what we do we may carry out for the advance of our faith with reverent care for him for whom we do it. But if we do something with a relaxed will and a thought taken up with other things, the body's duties will indeed be occupied in the doing, but through negligence we shall not attain the merit of devotion.
118.1.12CSEL 22:366–367
Habemus nunc post mandatorum custodiam etiam iustificationum obseruantiam. et mandata iam superius, quae esse existimaremus, ostendimus. iustificationes autem sunt plures atque in obseruandis singulis officiorum generibus -temperandae: ad quorum custodiam, nisi a deo dirigamur, infirmes per naturam nostram erimus. adiuuandi igitur per gratiam eius dirigendique sumus, ut praeceptarum iustificationum ordinem consequamur. est nobis iustificatio circa seruum Hebraeum distributa, est circa filium, est circa patrem, est circa fratres, est circa fideles uiros, est circa ecclesiae principes, est circa angelos, est circa deum ac dominum nostrum unigenitum dei uerbum. in singulis ergo quibusque generibus atque nominibus iustificationis ratio est; quia nisi haec omnia ex conparibus deuotae uoluntatis officiis retineantur, iustificationem dei non tenebimus. religiosus in patrem, si oderit filium, modum iustificationis amisit. religiosus in fratrem, si oderit seruum, perdidit iustificationis dei ordinem. religiosus in dominum, si oderit sacerdotem, quam iustificationis obseruantiam in religione dei explebit, odia in ipsa ministeria iustificationis exercens? iam uero in ipsa fidei ueritate, id est de dei patris et domini intellegentia, per quam maxime iustificatio nobis erit prompta, quanta opus est nobis dei gratia, ut recta sapiamus, ut ex propheticis atque euangelicis auctoritatibus unum idemque teneamus, in uno aut altero opinio nostra et sermo dissideat, sed uniuersas dei iustificationes aequa ac pari operum ac doctrinae obseruantia dirigamus!
We now have, after the keeping of commandments, also the observance of justifications. We have already shown above what we think commandments are. But justifications are many, and they are to be balanced in observing each kind of duty; for keeping them we shall be weak by our nature unless we are directed by God. We must therefore be helped and directed by his grace, so that we may attain the order of the justifications commanded. There is a justification laid down for us concerning the Hebrew slave, concerning a son, concerning a father, concerning brothers, concerning faithful men, concerning the leaders of the church, concerning angels, concerning God and our Lord, the only-begotten Word of God. In each kind and name, then, there is a principle of justification; because unless all these are held with equal duties of a devoted will, we shall not hold God's justification. One who is devout toward his father, if he hates his son, has lost the measure of justification. One devout toward his brother, if he hates his slave, has lost the order of God's justification. One devout toward the Lord, if he hates the priest, what observance of justification will he fulfil in the worship of God, while he exercises hatred against the very ministers of justification? And in the very truth of the faith, that is, in the understanding of God the Father and the Lord, through which above all justification will be ready to hand for us, how much we need the grace of God, so that we may think rightly, so that from the authorities of the prophets and the gospels we may hold one and the same thing, and that our opinion and speech may not disagree in one point or another, but that we may direct all God's justifications with an even and equal observance of works and teaching!
118.1.13CSEL 22:367–368
Quod cum consequemur, tum dicere id. quod consequenti continetur, licebit: tunc, in omnia mandata tua. nisi enim attenti in omnibus mandatis eius erimus ac deuersabimur, eruntque alia praeterita, pro uoluntate obseruata, iustificationis ordinem non tenemus. ceterum si directis uiis nostris erit par in omnes aequalisque custodia, nullo obliuionis uel pudore confusi omnium mandatorum obseruatione gaudebimus.
When we attain this, then it will be permitted to say what is contained in the following verse: "Then I shall not be put to shame, when I look into all your commandments." For unless we are attentive and occupied in all his commandments, and some are passed over while others are kept at will, we do not hold the order of justification. But if, our ways being directed, our keeping is even and equal toward all, we shall rejoice in the observance of all the commandments, confounded by no forgetfulness or shame.
118.1.14CSEL 22:368
Sequitur deinde hic septimus uersus: confitebor tibi cordis mei, in eo, quod didici iudicia iustitiae tuae. iustificationes tuas custodiam. abicienda ergo est omnis animae peruersitas et directo atque in nullam aliam partem deflexo corde est confitendum, ne decidat animus in saeculi curam, ne ex illis doctrinae dei semitis in deuia euagetur. sed directae huius confessionis ea causa est, quae consequenti uersu continetur: in eo, quod didici iudicia iustitiae tuae. primum igitur orauit, ut ad custodiendas iustificationes directae uiae ipsius fierent. secundo in nullo confundendum se esse subiecit, cum in omnia dei mandata respiceret. tertio quoque in directione cordis sui deo se confessurum spopondit ob id, quia iudicia eius didicisset, per doctrinam scilicet directi cordis cognitaeque laudem deo reddens. sed iustitiae cognitae hic fructus est, ut iustificationes dei retineantur; et idcirco subiecit: iustificationes tuas custodiam. qui enim didicisse iudicia dei fructus est, nisi cognitionem nostram iustificationum obseruantia consequatur?
Then follows this seventh verse: "I will confess to you in the uprightness of my heart, in that I have learned the judgments of your righteousness. I will keep your justifications." All perversity of soul, then, must be cast off, and confession must be made with an upright heart turned aside to no other direction, so that the mind may not fall into the care of the world and wander off from those paths of God's teaching into byways. But the reason for this upright confession is what is contained in the following verse: "in that I have learned the judgments of your righteousness." First, then, he prayed that his ways might be directed to keep the justifications. Second, he added that he would be put to shame in nothing, since he looked into all God's commandments. Third, he promised that he would confess to God in uprightness of his heart because he had learned his judgments, giving praise to God, that is, through the teaching of an upright heart and of what he had learned. But this is the fruit of known righteousness, that God's justifications are kept; and so he added: "I will keep your justifications." For what fruit is there in having learned God's judgments, unless the observance of the justifications follows our knowledge?
118.1.15CSEL 22:368–369
Sed meminisse debemus, licet cognitio praestanda a deo sit, tamen esse semper orandum, ut his, quae in custodiendis iustificationibus suis custodire uolumus, faueat: scientes quidem frequenter nos ab eo ob temptationes derelinqui, ut per eas fides nostra probabilis fiat. uerumtamen secundum prophetam, ne nos penitus derelinquat, deprecandus est; ait enim: non me derelinquas usquequaque nimis. quod et in dominicae orationis ordine continetur, cum dicitur: non nos in temptatione, quam sufferre non possumus. scit apostolus derelinqui nos ad temptandum, sed nouit et mensuram infirmitatis nostrae deum nosse dicens: fidelis est deus, qui non permittat nos temptari supra quam possumus. Iob deus temptationi permittens a iure diaboli potestatem animae eius et secundum modum humanae temptanti ius dereliquit. infirmitatis suae igitur propheta conscius orat, ne ualde derelinquatur: ut inbecillitatem eius, tamquam Petri demergendi fluctibus, dominus, ut, quamquam ad temptandum sese relicturus sit, non tamen usquequaque et ualde, scilicet ne usque animae et fidei periculum.
But we must remember that, although knowledge is to be granted by God, we must still always pray that he may favor what we wish to keep in keeping his justifications: knowing indeed that we are often forsaken by him for temptations, so that through them our faith may be proved. Nevertheless, as the prophet says, we must pray that he not forsake us entirely; for he says: "Do not utterly forsake me." This is also contained in the order of the Lord's Prayer, when it is said: "Lead us not into temptation" which we cannot bear. The apostle knows that we are forsaken in order to be tested, but he also knows that God knows the measure of our weakness, saying: "God is faithful, who will not let us be tempted beyond what we are able." God, permitting Job to temptation, left power over his soul outside the devil's right, and left the tempter a right only according to the measure of human temptation. So the prophet, conscious of his weakness, prays not to be greatly forsaken: that the Lord may hold up his weakness, like Peter's when he was sinking in the waves, so that, although he is going to leave him to be tested, yet not utterly and greatly, that is, not to the point of danger to his soul and faith.
Tractates 118, chapter 2
118.2.1CSEL 22:369–370
In quo corrigit iunior uiam suam? et reliqua. In secunda consequentium octo uersuum littera ipse sibi propheta his, quibus responsurus sit, proposuit dicens: in quo corrigit adulescens uiam suam? ex proponentis persona sunt dicta. dehinc nunc tamquam respondentis confessio subditur: in custodiendo sermones tuos. contuendum autem est, secundum eum, quem in exordio habuimus, sermonem uera atque perfecta timoris dei instituta sub his elementis litterarum contineri, quibus quasi ad usum confessionis dei per ipsa infantiae rudimenta formamur. ergo intellegendus est propheta non otiose locutus esse: in quo corrigit adulescens uiam suam? omnem quidem aetatem optabile est ex his corporis sui uitiis ad innocentiae studium transferri, quia sera licet emendatio utilis sit obliuione uitiorum. sed placiturum deo uirum propheta conformans non expectat post longam ac diuturnam criminum consuetudinem doctrina dei et praeceptis timoris institui, sed rudes a peccatis annos et aetatem adhuc criminum nesciam uult non modo studiis aliquando, sed etiam ipsa consuetudine inbui. difficile est enim ab usitatis desinere, difficile est a familiaribus abstrahi, magnum in se consuetudo habet uinculum: et idcirco optimus ille erit cultor, quem non modo delictorum remissio sine crimine constituerit, sed ipsa illa praestiterit uitiorum ignoratio innocentem.
"Wherein does a young man correct his way?" and the rest. In the second letter of the following eight verses the prophet put a question to himself, to which he would answer, saying: "Wherein does a young man correct his way?" These words are spoken in the person of one who asks. Then follows the confession, as of one who answers: "In keeping your words." We must observe, according to the word we had at the beginning, that the true and complete ordinances of the fear of God are contained under these elements of letters, by which we are formed, as it were, for the practice of confessing God through the very rudiments of infancy. So we must understand that the prophet did not speak idly: "Wherein does a young man correct his way?" It is desirable for every age to be brought from the vices of its body to the pursuit of innocence, because amendment, even late, is useful in forgetting vices. But the prophet, shaping a man who will please God, does not wait for him to be trained in God's teaching and the precepts of fear after a long and lasting habit of crimes, but wants the years still untrained in sins and an age still ignorant of crimes to be steeped not only in its pursuits now and then but in its very habit. For it is hard to stop doing what one is used to, hard to be drawn away from what is familiar; habit holds a great bond in itself. And so the best worshipper will be the one whom not only the forgiveness of offenses has made blameless, but whom ignorance of vices itself has kept innocent.
118.2.2CSEL 22:370–371
Nouit Hieremias propheta aetatis huius beatitudinem dicens: bonum, inquit, est iuueni uiro, cum aufert iugum graue in iuuentute sua: t singulariter et tacebit. non expectat frigescentes senectute annos nec emortuam iam per aetatem uitiorum consuetudinem. uult longi praelii militem; uult eum Christi seruum, quem ne ipsa quidem praeteritorum criminum recordatio polluat nam in his, qui iam prouectioris aetatis crediderunt, inest quidem per donum gratiae praeteritorum indulgentia; sed non abest per naturam gestorum recordatio. bonum, inquit, iuueni auferre iugum graue. onus istud crudi ad oboediendum anni aegre; ceterum aetas tenera grauis oneris molestiam per uirtutis incrementa non sentit. sed suscepto in iuuentute onere quid faciet? sedebit, inquit, singulariter et tacebit. rarus iste est, cum quo perfectio timoris dei per annorum augmenta concrescat; et idcirco singularis sedebit, lasciuos adulescentiae coetus derelinquens et ab ipso senum nuper credentium consessu remotus; quia ei non conpetit dicere: delicta iuuentutis, domine, ne memineris. silebit etiam congruam fidei et iuuentuti existimans taciturnitatem: non tumultibus negotiorum saecularium admixtus, sed per modestiam tacens, sola diuina sacramentorum cognitione occupatus et sermones dei tacita rerum atque operum obseruatione custodiens.
The prophet Jeremiah knew the blessedness of this age, saying: "It is good," he says, "for a young man when he takes up a heavy yoke in his youth; he will sit alone and be silent." He does not wait for years grown cold with old age, or for a habit of vices already dead through age. He wants a soldier for a long battle; he wants as Christ's servant one whom not even the memory of past crimes pollutes. For in those who have believed at a more advanced age there is indeed, by the gift of grace, the forgiveness of what is past; but by nature the memory of what was done is not absent. "It is good," he says, "for a young man to take up a heavy yoke." Years hardened in disobedience bear this burden with difficulty; but a tender age does not feel the trouble of a heavy burden, through the growth of its strength. But having taken up the burden in youth, what will he do? "He will sit alone," he says, "and be silent." Rare is the one in whom the perfection of the fear of God grows with the increase of years; and so he will sit alone, leaving the wanton gatherings of youth and set apart even from the company of old men who have only lately believed; because it does not fit him to say: "Remember not, Lord, the sins of my youth." He will also be silent, thinking silence suited to faith and to youth: not mixed in the tumult of worldly business, but silent through modesty, occupied only with the divine knowledge of the mysteries, and keeping God's words by silent observance in things and deeds.
118.2.3CSEL 22:371–372
Redit deinde ad personam suam propheta, ut id, quod superius dixerat. significasse de se nosceretur, dicens: in toto corde exquisiui te: ne repellas me a mandatis tuis. conpetere bonitati dei non uidetur, ut a mandatis suis quemquam repellat; sed sermonum adiectio et uirtus uerborum, ex perfecta caelestis doctrinae ratione disposita est, nihil dubium, nihil contrarium in se habet qui ergo secundum prophetam mauult peccatorum quam mortem, numquid est a mandatis suis quemquam repellere? procul sit istud existimari. sed neque hoc nunc propheta sensit, maxime qui in toto corde deum perquisierit.
Then the prophet returns to his own person, so that what he had said above might be known to have been meant of himself, saying: "With my whole heart I have sought you; do not drive me away from your commandments." It does not seem fitting to God's goodness that he should drive anyone away from his commandments; but the addition of words and the force of the expressions are arranged according to the perfect reason of heavenly teaching and have nothing doubtful or contradictory in them. So does he who, as the prophet says, prefers the repentance of sinners to their death, drive anyone away from his commandments? Far be it that this should be thought. Nor did the prophet mean this now, least of all one who had sought God with his whole heart.
118.2.4CSEL 22:372
Sed absolutio difficultatum in his ipsis requirenda est, e quibus uidetur existere. propheta enim quid senserit, in promptu est noscere. legimus scriptum in Hieremia: maledictus, qui facit opera domini neglegenter. legimus et in euangeliis scriptum: omni enim habenti dabitur et abundabit; et qui non habet, etiam quod habet auferetur ab eo. ergo habens abundabit; non habens uero ipso illo, quod habet, indigebit. propheta non est obnoxius maledictionis condicioni, quia non neglegenter opera dei egit eum toto corde perquirens. deinde confidenter petit, ne a mandatis dei apellatur, quia eum toto corde perquirat. secundum euangelia enim habenti dabitur, et ei, qui non habet, etiam id, quod habet, auferetur. deus igitur non auferet nisi non habenti, secundum quod neque repellit nisi neglegentem. adeo autem bonitate plenus est, ut habentem abundantia muneretur: adeo uero non uult quemquam non habere, uti non habenti ipsum, quod habet, adimat.
But the solution of difficulties must be sought in the very words from which they seem to arise. What the prophet meant is easy to know. We read it written in Jeremiah: "Cursed is he who does the works of the Lord carelessly." We read too in the gospels: "For to everyone who has, it will be given, and he will have abundance; and whoever does not have, even what he has will be taken from him." So the one who has will abound; but the one who does not have will lack even what he has. The prophet is not subject to the condition of the curse, because he did not do God's works carelessly, seeking him with his whole heart. Then he asks confidently not to be driven from God's commandments, because he seeks him with his whole heart. For according to the gospels, to the one who has it will be given, and from the one who does not have, even what he has will be taken away. So God takes away only from the one who does not have, just as he drives away only the careless. He is so full of goodness that he rewards the one who has with abundance; and so little does he wish anyone not to have, that he takes from the one who does not have even what he has.
118.2.5CSEL 22:372–373
Neminem igitur nisi obnitentem repellit, neminem nisi neglegentem reicit. hanc enim propheta praetulit causam, cur se non repelli a mandatis dei precaretur, quia non ex parte neque per desidiam deum, sed toto corde quaesisset; per quod intellegimus eum a mandatis repelli, qui per multam incuriam fuerit indignus admitti: et extra inhibentis inuidiam est, quod de culpa proficiscitur non merentis.
He drives away no one, then, except one who resists, rejects no one except the careless. For the prophet put forward this reason why he prayed not to be driven from God's commandments: that he had sought God not in part or with sloth but with his whole heart. From this we understand that the one driven from the commandments is the one who, through great carelessness, has been unworthy to be admitted; and what comes from the fault of the one who does not deserve it lies outside any blame of the one who refuses.
118.2.6CSEL 22:373
Tertius iste secundae uersus est: abscondi eloquia tua, ut non peccem tibi. meminimus simile huic dicto legi solere, ubi dicitur: mysterium regis bonum est abscondere. meminimus et Paulum ad Corinthios adhuc in fide paruulos dei eloquia occultasse, cum dicit: uos potaui, non cibo; nondum enim poteratis, sed neque adhuc potestis. legimus et in euangelio in agro uberi atque fecundo repertum thensaurum eundemque empto agro occultari. nouimus neque margaritas ante porcos proiciendas esse, neque sanctum canibus dare oportere. ergo intellegimus nos cordis nostri secreto continere, diuulgata peccati culpam conparabunt. ita enim dixit: in corde meo abscondi eloquia tua, ut non peccem tibi: quia, cum cetera peccata secundum differentias rerum aut in nos ipsos aut in alios exercentur, tamen tum fierent in deum propria, cum, cordium essent condenda secreto, in cognitionis scientiam proderentur.
This is the third verse of the second letter: "I have hidden your sayings, that I may not sin against you." We remember that something like this saying is usually read, where it is said: "It is good to hide the mystery of a king." We remember too that Paul hid the sayings of God from the Corinthians, still little ones in faith, when he says: "I gave you milk to drink, not food; for you were not yet able, nor are you able even now." We read too in the gospel that a treasure found in a rich and fruitful field was hidden, and the field bought. We know that pearls must not be thrown before swine, nor what is holy given to dogs. So we understand that we hold in the secret of our heart what, if spread abroad, would incur the guilt of sin. For so he said: "In my heart I have hidden your sayings, that I may not sin against you": because, while other sins, according to the differences of things, are committed either against ourselves or against others, they would become sins properly against God when things that were to be stored in the secret of hearts were betrayed to the knowledge of those not fit to receive them.
118.2.7CSEL 22:373–374
Contuendus autem est in quarto hoc, qui consequitur, ordo doctrinae. primus uersus de custodiendis ab adulescente mandatis dei constitit; sequens, quia in toto corde deum exquisierit, ne a mandatis dei apelleretur; dehinc quod sacramenta absconsa et occulta dei mysteria mentis secreto continuerit; quarto nunc id deprecatur, ut iustificationes eidem ostendat: et deprecatur confessionis honore praelato dicens: benedictus es, domine: doce me iustificationes tuas. de iustificationibus nonnulla aliqua anteriore sermone conplexi sumus, et superfluum est eadem frequenter iterare. maximus igitur et praecipuus labor est hanc iustificationum dei scientiam consequi, et humanae naturae infirmitas difficulter tot tantarumque rerum cognitionem consequitur: atque ob id ut doceatur orat, quia diuinae bonitatis munus est, animi humani inperitiam ad congruam atque unicuique generi conpetentem officiorum obseruantiam temperare.
In this fourth verse, which follows, the order of teaching must be observed. The first verse was about the keeping of God's commandments by a young man; the next, that since he had sought God with his whole heart, he should not be driven from God's commandments; then, that he had held the hidden mysteries and secret sacraments of God in the secret of his mind; and now, fourth, he prays that God may show him the justifications; and he prays, putting first the honor of confession, saying: "Blessed are you, Lord; teach me your justifications." We covered something about justifications in an earlier discourse, and it is superfluous to repeat the same things often. It is, then, the greatest and chief labor to attain this knowledge of God's justifications, and the weakness of human nature reaches the knowledge of so many and such great things with difficulty; and therefore he prays to be taught, because it is the gift of divine goodness to temper the inexperience of the human mind to the fitting observance of duties suited to each kind.
118.2.8CSEL 22:374–375
Succedit deinde etiam de iudiciis dei sermo, quo dicit: in labiis meis pronuntiaui omnia iudicia oris tui. quanta rerum et nuncupationum differentia est! primum a iuuentute mandata dei custodiuntur, dehinc deus toto corde inquiritur, tum dei eloquia occuluntur et iustificationes disci desiderantur, nunc praedicantur. sed propheta forte existimabitur a se excidisse et uel suorum, uel alienorum dictorum inmemor fuisse. in hoc enim psalmorum libro legimus: iudicia tua sicut abyssus multa. Paulus apostolus ait: inexscrutabilia iudicia dei et rursum propheta: magna enim sunt iudicia tua et innumerabilia: et quomodo audebit propheta dicere: in labiis meis omnia iudicia oris tui? sed nihil neque contra se, neque contra alium eiusdem spiritus propheta nunc locutus est. non enim ait: in labiis pronuntiaui omnia iudicia, sed ait: omnia iudicia oris tui: sciens nonnullam differentiam esse iudiciorum dei et iudiciorum oris dei. numquid cum ait: iudicia tua sicut abyssus multa, dixit: iudicia oris tui sicut abyssus multa? nunc autem ait: iudicia oris tui adnuntiaui. ea ergo, quae cognita esse per prophetas uel ex dei uerbis iudicia esse potuerunt, et propheta non tacuit: quae idcirco praedicata sunt, ut docerentur.
Then follows a word about God's judgments as well, in which he says: "With my lips I have declared all the judgments of your mouth." How great is the difference of things and names! First God's commandments are kept from youth, then God is sought with the whole heart, then God's sayings are hidden and the justifications are longed to be learned; now they are proclaimed. But perhaps the prophet will be thought to have forgotten himself and to have been unmindful either of his own sayings or of others'. For in this book of Psalms we read: "Your judgments are like the great deep." The apostle Paul says: "Unsearchable are the judgments of God"; and again the prophet: "For your judgments are great and countless." How then will the prophet dare to say: "With my lips all the judgments of your mouth"? But the prophet has now said nothing against himself, nor against another of the same Spirit. For he does not say, "With my lips I have declared all the judgments," but he says, "all the judgments of your mouth," knowing that there is some difference between the judgments of God and the judgments of God's mouth. When he says, "Your judgments are like the great deep," did he say, "The judgments of your mouth are like the great deep"? But now he says: "I have declared the judgments of your mouth." So those things which could be known through the prophets, or be judgments from God's words, the prophet too did not keep silent: they were proclaimed for this reason, that they might be taught.
118.2.9CSEL 22:375–376
Post iudicium autem oris dei publicam et constantem id sequitur: in uia testimoniorum tuorum delectatus sum, sicut in omnibus diuitiis. non timet propheta testes, sed in his delectatur; et ei conscientia spectantium se et contuentium iucunda est. trepidat enim ad omnem intercessionem conscientiae metus; ceterum, ubi constans innocentis fiducia est, plurium testium interuentio grata est. sed non de communis consuetudine gaudii iucundus propheta est: delectatur enim sicut in diuitiis omnibus; non tantum in diuitiis, sed in diuitiis omnibus. sunt opes in auro, sunt in argento, sunt in pecuniis, sunt in uestibus, sunt in domibus, sunt in agris eorumque aut uitibus aut oleis aut frugibus: sed domini propheta doctrinarum fruge perfectus est et legis ac prophetalium institutionum facultatibus diues est et, anterior licet tempore, non tamen euangelicorum et apostolicorum praeceptorum ignarus est. nouit enim et has diuitias Paulus ad Corinthios loquens: gratias ago deo meo semper pro super gratia dei, data est in Christo Iesu: quoniam in omnibus ditati estis in ipso. in omni uerbo. in omni scientia. in his ergo diues est et in his delectatur propheta; ceterum non est existimandus opum conparatione delectatus esse, qui nisi cum contemptu atque inopia saeculi diues in domino esse non potuit.
After the public and steadfast declaration of the judgment of God's mouth there follows: "I have delighted in the way of your testimonies, as in all riches." The prophet does not fear witnesses, but delights in them; and the awareness of those who watch and observe him is pleasant to him. For the fear of a guilty conscience trembles at every interruption; but where there is the steadfast confidence of an innocent man, the presence of many witnesses is welcome. But the prophet is not pleased with a common kind of joy: he delights as in all riches; not only in riches, but in all riches. There is wealth in gold, in silver, in money, in clothing, in houses, in fields and their vines or olives or crops; but the prophet is made complete by the crop of the Lord's teachings and is rich in the resources of the law and of the prophetic ordinances; and although earlier in time, he is not ignorant of the precepts of the gospels and the apostles. For Paul too knew these riches, speaking to the Corinthians: "I give thanks to my God always for you, for the grace of God which was given you in Christ Jesus: that in everything you were enriched in him, in all speech and in all knowledge." In these, then, the prophet is rich and in these he delights; he must not be thought to have delighted in the acquiring of wealth, who could not be rich in the Lord except with contempt for the world and poverty in it.
118.2.10CSEL 22:376
Delectatus autem in uiis testimoniorum dei opus delectationis agere debebat; et non ambiguum est, quin agat. ait enim in septimo uersu: in mandatis tuis exercebor et considerabo uias tuas. exercitatione igitur et adsiduitate opus est, ut usus rerum necessariarum retineatur; quia periculosa est humanarum mentium et molesta desidia: ac, ne otii consuetudo subrepat, adsiduitas exercitationis adhibenda est. sed retentus etiam hic ordo rationis est. nam prius exercendus est in mandatis dei, tum deinde uiae eius considerandae; quia nisi fidelium operum usus praecesserit, doctrinae cognitio non adprehendetur. et agendum a nobis antea fideliter est, ut scientiam consequamur. uias ergo, secundum superiorem expositionem, legem, prophetas, omnia et apostolos esse existimamus: quos in mandatis dei se exercens propheta considerauit, ut nouerit.
Having delighted in the ways of God's testimonies, he had to do the work of that delight; and there is no doubt that he does it. For he says in the seventh verse: "I will exercise myself in your commandments, and I will consider your ways." So exercise and persistence are needed, so that the practice of necessary things may be retained; because sloth is dangerous and harmful to human minds, and lest a habit of idleness creep in, persistent exercise must be applied. But here too the order of reason is kept. For first one must be exercised in God's commandments, and then his ways are to be considered; because unless the practice of faithful works comes first, the knowledge of teaching will not be grasped. We must first act faithfully in order to attain knowledge. So, following the earlier explanation, we take the ways to be the law, the prophets, all things, and the apostles: which the prophet, exercising himself in God's commandments, considered in order to know them.
118.2.11CSEL 22:376–377
Conclusit autem octauum numerum uersu: in iustificationibus tuis meditabor, non obliuiscar sermonum tuorum. a doctrinae perfectae ordine propheta non excedit. in iustificationibus, quas doceri se orauit, meditatur, sicut exercetur in mandatis. mandatorum enim ea est ratio, quae nos ad obseruantiam atque opus instituunt, ut illud est: non occides, non moechaberis et cetera his similia. haec ergo exercentur, quia in his operationis est usus per praesentium se exercitationem ad futura confirmans. iustificationes autem sunt, quibus Hebraeus puer sexennio seruus liber deinceps anno septimo fiet, et post sex annorum fructus ager otiosus relinquendus est, et cetera in iustificationum obseruantiam constituta, quae ingentem in se habent futurae spei meditationem per negotii praesentis effectum. atque ideo in his meditatur, ut in mandatis exercetur: quia exercitatio usum retinet consuetudinis institutae, meditatio autem se in id, quod nondum obtinuit, extendit, ut per meditationem id, quod expetit,; meditatio iustificationis id consequitur, ne et promissionum subrepat obliuio.'
He concluded the eightfold number with the verse: "I will meditate on your justifications; I will not forget your words." The prophet does not depart from the order of perfect teaching. He meditates on the justifications, which he prayed to be taught, just as he is exercised in the commandments. For this is the nature of commandments, that they train us for observance and work, such as: "You shall not kill, you shall not commit adultery," and the like. These, then, are exercised, because in them there is the practice of action, which strengthens itself for the future through present exercise. But justifications are those by which a Hebrew boy, a slave for six years, becomes free in the seventh year, and a field is to be left fallow after six years of crops, and the other things laid down for the observance of justifications, which hold in themselves a vast meditation on future hope through the effect of present business. And so he meditates on these as he is exercised in the commandments: because exercise retains the practice of a settled habit, while meditation stretches toward what it has not yet obtained, so that through meditation it may attain what it seeks; the meditation on justification achieves this, that forgetfulness of the promises does not creep in.
Tractates 118, chapter 3
118.3.1CSEL 22:377–378
Quibus non est constans emundati cordis conscientia, precari ista prophetae uoce non possunt: retribue seruo tuo. si enim digna secundum opera nostra retributio aderit, in peccatorum ac delictorum nostrorum poenis manebimus. satis autem est, si cui uel haec saltim fiducia gratulandi ad dominum fuerit: non secundum peccata nostra fecit nobis, … nobis. quia secundum altitudinem caeli a terra a nobis iniquitates nostras, quia ipse cognouit figmentum nostrum. magnum est in se dei misericordiam recognoscere et scire consuetudinem criminum procul se abesse et dignum dei misericordia se esse. propheta autem hic, in cuius scilicet corpore habitatio dei digna est, qui sancto spiritu plenus non communia nec terrena cogitat et effatur, libertatis eius est, ut oret: retribue seruo tuo.
Those who do not have the steadfast awareness of a cleansed heart cannot pray these words with the prophet's voice: "Repay your servant." For if a repayment worthy of our works were given, we would remain in the punishments of our sins and offenses. It is enough if anyone has at least this confidence to give thanks to the Lord: "He has not dealt with us according to our sins … because as high as heaven is above the earth, so far has he removed our iniquities from us, because he knows our frame." It is a great thing to recognize God's mercy toward oneself, and to know that the habit of crimes is far from oneself, and that one is worthy of God's mercy. But this prophet, in whose body a dwelling of God is fitting, who, full of the Holy Spirit, thinks and speaks nothing common or earthly, has the freedom to pray: "Repay your servant."
118.3.2CSEL 22:378
Sed forte insolentis istud est, sine aliqua confessionis modestia meritum retributionis optasse, nec se in corpore situm, id est in uili atque humili sorte esse meminisse. exclusit autem propheta omnem de se uanitatis ac opinionem. nam cum dixisset retribue ex innocentia, seruo tuo ex seruitutis officio et ex condicionis suae confessione subiecit. constanter igitur haec postulat, qui se dei seruum, non peccati esse meminit; quia omnis, qui peccat, seruus est peccati.
But perhaps it is insolent to have desired the merit of repayment without any modesty of confession, and not to remember that one is placed in a body, that is, in a mean and lowly lot. But the prophet excluded every vain opinion of himself. For when he had said "Repay" out of innocence, he added "your servant" out of the duty of servitude and the confession of his condition. So he asks these things steadfastly who remembers that he is God's servant, not sin's; because everyone who sins is a slave of sin.
118.3.3CSEL 22:378–379
Viuam, inquit, et obseruabo sermones tuos. uiuam atque obseruabo non praesentis temporis res est, sed significatio sermonis eius in futuri se tempus extendit. scit enim propheta, quando beata illa et uera uiuentium sit uita. nunc enim et in puluere mortis manemus et in mortis corpore sumus, a quo se liberari apostolus orat dicens: miser ego homo, quis me liberabit a corpore mortis huius? habemus autem etiam nunc admixtam nobis materiam, quae mortis legi et peccati obnoxia est; et in huius caducae carnis infirmisque domicilio corruptionis labem ex eius consortio mutuamur, ac nisi glorificato in naturam spiritus corpore uerae in nobis non potest esse natura. audiamus eum, qui se meminit in corpore mortis habitare, dicentem: quia uita nostra absconsa est cum Christo in deo. cum apparuerit, uita nostra, tunc et uos apparebitis in gloria. hanc ergo retributionem sibi propheta orat, ut uiuat, futurae huius tempus in loco altero docens, quo ait: et placebo deo in regione uiuentium. scit hanc mundi istius sedem regionem non esse uiuentium; scit nos adhuc secundum legis emundandos esse. nunc enim admiscemur: et in lege quisquis mortuum contrectat, inmundus est.
"I shall live," he says, "and I will keep your words." "I shall live and keep" is not a matter of present time, but the meaning of his words stretches into future time. For the prophet knows when that blessed and true life of the living will be. For now we both remain in the dust of death and are in the body of death, from which the apostle prays to be freed, saying: "Wretched man that I am, who will free me from the body of this death?" Even now we have a matter mixed with us which is subject to the law of death and sin; and in the dwelling of this perishable and weak flesh we take on the stain of corruption from fellowship with it; and unless the body is glorified into the nature of spirit, true nature cannot be in us. Let us hear him who remembered that he dwelt in the body of death, saying: "For our life is hidden with Christ in God. When our life appears, then you too will appear in glory." This, then, is the repayment the prophet prays for himself, that he may live, teaching the time of this future life in another place, where he says: "And I will please God in the land of the living." He knows that this seat of the world is not the land of the living; he knows that we must still be cleansed according to the law. For now we are mixed in with the dead; and in the law whoever touches a dead body is unclean.
118.3.4CSEL 22:379–380
Sed absit istud, ut quicquam horum in lege corporaliter intellegatur. tamquam per contrectationem mortui quisquam fiat inmundus. Ioseph ossa egrediens Aegyptum Moyses ipse lator legis abstulit, Eliseus mortuo, ut eum uiuificaret, incubuit, dominus ipse mortuos manu in uitam retraxit: et contrectatio mortui si inmundum effectura fuisset, nequaquam neque a tantis uiris neque a domino uiolata lex esset, ipso dicente: legem soluere, sed implere. sed quia lex umbra est futurorum bonorum, idcirco per hanc significantiam docuit nos in hoc terreni et morticini corporis habitaculo mundos esse non posse, nisi per ablutionem caelestis emundationem consequamur, post demutationem resurrectionis terreni corporis nostri effecta gloriosiore natura.
But far be it that any of these things in the law should be understood bodily, as though anyone becomes unclean by touching a dead body. Moses himself, the giver of the law, carried away Joseph's bones when leaving Egypt; Elisha lay upon a dead boy to bring him to life; the Lord himself drew the dead back to life by his hand. If touching a dead body had made one unclean, the law would never have been violated by such great men or by the Lord, who himself says: "I came not to abolish the law, but to fulfil it." But because the law is a shadow of good things to come, it taught us by this sign that in this dwelling of an earthly and dead body we cannot be clean unless we attain cleansing through heavenly washing, after the change of resurrection has given our earthly body a more glorious nature.
118.3.5CSEL 22:380
Et forte si quis existimet sibi in sacramento baptismi perfectam illam innocentiae et caelestis uitae dignam redditam puritatem, Iohannem Baptistam dixisse recolat: ego quidem baptizo uos in aqua; qui autem uenit, fortior me est, ipse uos baptizat in spiritu sancto et igni; ipsum autem dominum baptizatum a Iohanne, cum adhuc esset in corpore, meminerit locutum: adhuc habeo aliud baptisma baptizari. est ergo, quantum licet existimare, perfectae emundatio puritatis etiam post baptismi aquas reposita, quae nos sancti spiritus sanctificet aduentu, quae iudicii igni nos decoquet, quae per mortis iniuriam a labe morticinae et societate purgabit, martyrii passione deuoto ac fideli sanguine abluet.
And if perhaps anyone thinks that in the sacrament of baptism that perfect purity of innocence, worthy of heavenly life, has been restored to him, let him recall that John the Baptist said: "I indeed baptize you in water; but he who comes is mightier than I; he will baptize you in the Holy Spirit and fire"; and let him remember that the Lord himself, baptized by John, said while he was still in the body: "I have yet another baptism to be baptized with." So there is, as far as one may judge, a cleansing of perfect purity laid up even after the waters of baptism, which will sanctify us by the coming of the Holy Spirit, which will refine us in the fire of judgment, which through the injury of death will purge us from the stain and fellowship of what is dead, and will wash us in the suffering of martyrdom with devoted and faithful blood.
118.3.6CSEL 22:380–381
Et idcirco sanctus propheta uicturum se dicit esse, cum uiuat, per hanc scilicet umbram ad ueram illam regionem uiuentium transferendum. secundum quod exemplum, ut dixit: uiuam. ita et: custodiam sermones tuos. custodiuntur interim apostolum Paulum pro parte et per speculum. sunt enim multa saeculi scandala, prohibent perfectam in nobis mandatorum esse custodiam. taceo de naturis corporum, quae nos interim aut per aut per incentiua uitiorum inperfectos esse conpellunt. at uero morte uicta et aculeo eius obtuso et cum facie ad faciem audiamus atque cernamus, tunc uere et uiuemus et dei mandata seruabimus.
And therefore the holy prophet says that he will live when he lives, that is, when he has been carried through this shadow to that true land of the living. On this pattern, as he said "I shall live," so too "I will keep your words." Meanwhile they are kept, as the apostle Paul says, in part and through a mirror. For there are many stumbling blocks of the world, which prevent the keeping of the commandments from being perfect in us. I say nothing of the natures of our bodies, which meanwhile compel us to be imperfect through … or through the incitements of vices. But when death is conquered and its sting blunted, and we hear and see face to face, then we shall truly both live and keep God's commandments.
118.3.7CSEL 22:381–382
Ordo, qui primo uersu continetur, hic idem in consequentibus est. ait enim: oculos meos et considerabo mirabilia de lege tua. scit mortalibus oculis atque corporeis nubem obscuritatis obsistere. scit ea, quae corporaliter in lege praecepta sunt, umbram esse et speculum futurorum. legem quidem legit, sed optat legis mirabilia contueri. meminit esse sancta sabbata, sed in aeternorum sabbatorum requie esse desiderat. utitur quidem azymis panibus, sed fermentum eicere naturae ueteris festinat. immolat paschae ouem, sed adsistere ei, qui per Iohannem reuelatur, agno concupiscit. septimi anni legi satisfacit, sed ipse exactis septem milibus saeculi esse liber expostulat. iubelaei quinquagesimi anni legem explet, sed pentecostadis remissionem ac renouationem obtinere festinat. scit ex praecepto dei secundum exemplar et altarium a Moyse institutum et Aaron sacerdotali habitu ornatuque uestitum, sed principis sacerdotum, in cuius exemplum haec fiebant, interesse ministeriis properat. induci quoque in terram sanctam, terram fluentem lacte et melle, iam totius huius orbis peregrinus orat. uniuersa quidem ista corporaliter gerunt, sed hoc Paulus aliter intellegit dicens: scimus enim, quia lex spiritalis est. igitur legis mirabilia, quae uelatis oculis adumbrantur, propheta orat ut cernat: scilicet ut caduco atque corpore absolutus haec, quae per corporalem obseruantiam legis magna et mirabilia in caelis praefigurantur, aspiciat.
The order contained in the first verse is the same in those that follow. For he says: "Unveil my eyes, and I will consider the wonders of your law." He knows that a cloud of darkness stands in the way of mortal and bodily eyes. He knows that what is commanded bodily in the law is a shadow and mirror of things to come. He reads the law, indeed, but he longs to behold the law's wonders. He remembers that the Sabbaths are holy, but he desires to be in the rest of the eternal Sabbaths. He uses unleavened bread, but he hastens to cast out the leaven of the old nature. He sacrifices the Passover lamb, but he longs to stand beside the Lamb who is revealed through John. He satisfies the law of the seventh year, but he asks to be free himself when the seven thousand years of the world are completed. He fulfils the law of the fiftieth year of jubilee, but he hastens to obtain the remission and renewal of Pentecost. He knows that by God's command both the altar was set up by Moses after the pattern and Aaron was clothed in priestly dress and ornament, but he hastens to take part in the ministries of the high priest after whose pattern these things were done. Already a stranger to this whole world, he prays to be brought into the holy land, the land flowing with milk and honey. All these things they carry out bodily, but Paul understands this otherwise, saying: "For we know that the law is spiritual." So the prophet prays to see the wonders of the law that are foreshadowed to veiled eyes: that is, that set free from the perishable body he may behold the great and wonderful things in heaven which are prefigured through the bodily observance of the law.
118.3.8CSEL 22:382
Non demutatur orantis. post haec enim ait: adcola sum in terra; ne abscondas a me mandata tua. adcola non iuris sui terram incolit, sed aduena atque peregrinus fructum ex ea temporariae operationis nouit incolatus huius apostolus ordinem dicens, peregrinandum a corpore et cum Christo manendum esse. propheta itaque quasdam imagines caelestium fide cernens, licet corpus, tamen rem non suam incolit oculis in caelum mentis erectis. scit in caelo thensauros conlocandos, thensaurus sit, illic futurum sit. non erat ille sensu suo terrae adcola, qui in euangelica conparatione horrea extruit capacia ingentium fructuum et animam suam per copiam ad delicias adhortatur, stultus anima ipsa eadem nocte priuandus!
The order of the one praying is not changed. For after this he says: "I am a sojourner on the earth; do not hide your commandments from me." A sojourner does not dwell on land that is his own by right, but as a newcomer and stranger he knows the fruit of temporary labor from it. The apostle states the order of this sojourning, saying that we must be away from the body and remain with Christ. So the prophet, seeing certain images of heavenly things by faith, though he dwells in a body, dwells in something not his own, with the eyes of his mind lifted to heaven. He knows that treasures are to be laid up in heaven, and that where the treasure is, there the heart will be. That man in the gospel comparison was not in his own mind a sojourner on earth, who built barns large enough for great crops and urged his soul to luxury through his abundance, a fool to be deprived of that very soul that same night!
118.3.9CSEL 22:382–383
Ergo adcolam se propheta confitens orat, ne mandata dei a se occulantur. nemo enim, nisi peregrinus corporis sui, cognitione mandatorum dei dignus est. quod mandatum dei cum lucidum sit et inluminans oculos, absurde nunc uidebitur dixisse, ne sibi mandata dei occulantur, quae hoc naturae in se habent, ut et lucida sint et inluminent. sed neglegentia aurium adfert sensus difficultatem. illic enim mandatum lucidum et inluminans est, hic mandata absconsa sunt. lucidum mandatum est, per quod ad contuendum lumen mandatorum inluminamur. per mandatum, quod in lege primum est, quo deum ex tota anima et ex tota uirtute amare, digni quoque inluminatione cognitionis efficimur. et sicut de gloria in gloriam transibimus, sic et in lumine uidebimus lumen, sic et per speculum faciem ipsam aliquando cernemus. per hoc enim nunc corporalis uitae mandatum sacramento baptismi et praecepto dei inluminamur, et lumine utimur et in gloria manemus. per hoc rursum ex mandato et mandata cernemus, per hoc ex lumen uidebimus, per hoc ex gloria in gloriam transferemur.
So the prophet, confessing himself a sojourner, prays that God's commandments not be hidden from him. For no one who is not a stranger to his own body is worthy of the knowledge of God's commandments. Since God's commandment is bright and enlightens the eyes, it will now seem absurd that he said that God's commandments should not be hidden from him, when they have this nature in themselves, that they are bright and give light. But careless hearing makes the meaning difficult. There the commandment is bright and enlightening; here the commandments are hidden. The commandment is bright through which we are enlightened to behold the light of the commandments. Through the commandment which is first in the law, to love God with all one's soul and all one's strength, we are also made worthy of the enlightenment of knowledge. And just as we shall pass from glory to glory, so too in light we shall see light, so too through a mirror we shall one day see the face itself. For through this commandment of bodily life we are now enlightened by the sacrament of baptism and the precept of God, and we use the light and remain in glory. Through this, again, from the commandment we shall also see the commandments; through this, from light we shall see light; through this we shall be carried from glory to glory.
118.3.10CSEL 22:383–384
Scit autem in caelis propheta plura dei esse mandata, scit per diuersitatem ministeriorum diuersas esse praeceptorum obseruantias, angelorum, archangelorum, thronum, dominationum, potestatum et principatuum. quos utique necesse est, ut nominibus, ita et officiis esse diuersos, perpetuam tamen mandatorum custodiam pro naturae suae firmitate retinentes. atque ob id reuelari sibi caelestium mandatorum sacramenta orat, quia sciat se in terrae huius corpore esse peregrinum.
The prophet knows that in heaven there are many commandments of God; he knows that through the diversity of ministries there are diverse observances of precepts, of angels, archangels, thrones, dominions, powers, and principalities. These must surely be diverse in their offices as they are in their names, yet they keep a perpetual keeping of the commandments in accordance with the firmness of their nature. And for this reason he prays that the mysteries of the heavenly commandments be revealed to him, because he knows that he is a stranger in the body of this earth.
118.3.11CSEL 22:384
Quartus hic tertiae litterae uersus est: anima mea, ut desiderem iudicia tua in omni tempore. non est prophetae huius communis cum ceteris uel saeculi sermo; altius sub significatione familiarium uerborum intellegentiae extulit sensum dicens: concupiuit anima mea, ut desiderem iudicia tua in omni tempore. multis enim uidebitur rectius dictum fuisse, desiderat anima mea iudicia tua in omni tempore. et forte quidam id ipsum sub his dictis contineri.
This is the fourth verse of the third letter: "My soul has longed to desire your judgments at all times." This prophet's speech is not common with others' or with the world's; he raised the meaning of understanding higher under the signification of familiar words, saying: "My soul has longed to desire your judgments at all times." To many it will seem that it would have been more correctly said, "My soul desires your judgments at all times." And perhaps some think that this very thing is contained in these words.
118.3.12CSEL 22:384–385
Sed meminit propheta arduum esse et naturae humanae periculosissimum dei desiderare iudicia. cum enim nemo uiuens in conspectu ipsius mundus sit, quomodo desiderabile eius potest esse iudicium? - an cum ex omni uerbo otioso rationem simus, diem iudicii concupiscemus, in quo nobis est ille indefessus ignis obeundus, in quo subeunda sunt grauia illa a peccatis animae supplicia? beatae animam gladius pertransibit, ut reuelentur multorum cordium cogitationes. si in iudicii seueritatem capax illa dei uirgo uentura est, desiderare quis audebit a deo iudicari? Iob omni humanarum calamitatum militia et uictoria perfunctus, qui cum temptaretur, ait: dominus dedit, dominus abstulit, sit nomen eius benedictum in, cinerem se esse confessus est et audita de nube dei uoce non loquendum sibi ultra esse. et erit ausus dei desiderare iudicia, cuius uocem de caelis nec tantus propheta sustinuit, neque apostoli consistentes in monte cum domino ferre potuerunt?
But the prophet remembers that to desire God's judgments is hard and most dangerous for human nature. For since no one living is clean in his sight, how can his judgment be desirable? Or, since we must give account for every idle word, shall we long for the day of judgment, in which we must pass through that unwearying fire, in which those heavy punishments of the soul for sins must be undergone? A sword will pierce the soul of the blessed one, so that the thoughts of many hearts may be revealed. If that virgin who was able to hold God is to come into the severity of judgment, who will dare to desire to be judged by God? Job, who had gone through the whole campaign of human calamities and won the victory, who said when he was tempted, "The Lord gave, the Lord has taken away; blessed be his name," confessed that he was dust and ashes, and when he heard God's voice from the cloud, said that he must speak no more. And will anyone dare to desire God's judgments, when so great a prophet could not bear his voice from heaven, nor could the apostles standing on the mountain with the Lord endure it?
118.3.13CSEL 22:385
Tenuit itaque propheta humanae et naturae et modum dicens: concupiuit anima mea, ut desiderem iudicia tua in omni tempore. non enim iudicium desiderat, sed, ut desideret, concupiscit: desiderii eum cupiditas, non iudicii continebat. concupiscit enim desiderare, scilicet ut in tanta innocentia maneat, ut tuto iam et sine metuendi iudicii terrore desideret, rem ipsam nondum per conscientiam humanae condicionis desiderans, sed eius desiderium, ex conscientia ut proueniat innocentiae, concupiscens. scit uero continentem et indefessam desiderii huius concupiscentiam esse oportere; atque ideo adiecit: in omni tempore, nullum scilicet docens otium nobis esse debere, quin semper desiderii huius cupiditate teneamur.
So the prophet kept to the measure both of human nature and of its condition, saying: "My soul has longed to desire your judgments at all times." For he does not desire the judgment, but longs to desire it: the longing for desire held him, not for judgment. For he longs to desire, that is, to remain in such innocence that he may desire safely and without the terror of a judgment to be feared; not yet desiring the thing itself, because of his awareness of the human condition, but longing for the desire of it, so that it may come from the awareness of innocence. And he knows that the longing for this desire must be continual and unwearying; and therefore he added "at all times," teaching that we must have no idle time in which we are not held by the longing for this desire.
118.3.14CSEL 22:385–386
Deinde sequitur: increpasti superbos: maledicti, qui declinant a mandatis tuis. o infelix superbia, quae dedignatur sub praeceptis caelestibus uiuere, quae mandata diuina animi infidelis tumore fastidit! plurima sunt humanorum uitiorum crimina, et diuersae atque innumerabiles peccatorum operationes; sed nulla magis in nos dei quam superbiae causa est. increpasti enim non auaros, non lasciuos, quibus utique increpatio debita est, sed superbos; quia plures per superbiam. qua humana contemnunt, etiam deo obsequi spernunt.
Then follows: "You have rebuked the proud; cursed are those who turn aside from your commandments." O unhappy pride, which disdains to live under heavenly precepts, which scorns the divine commandments with the swelling of an unbelieving mind! Many are the crimes of human vices, and diverse and countless the workings of sins; but there is no greater cause of God's anger against us than pride. For you have rebuked not the greedy, not the lustful, to whom rebuke is certainly due, but the proud; because many, through the pride by which they despise human things, also scorn to obey God.
118.3.15CSEL 22:386
Sed sint licet praeclara cetera fidei opera et in omni diuinorum custodia deuotio inmoretur, tamen subrepente superbia memoria eorum, recte operamur, abolebitur. quanto euangelicus ille labore se in uitae uiam statuit, ne alienae rei rapax esset, ne in quemquam iniuriosus existeret, ne adulteriis dissolueretur! laborauit bis in sabbato ieiunans suumque corpus per abstinentiam cibi ingentis uirtute confecit. quanto deinde labore auaritiae uincendae decimas substantiae suae in usum egentium contulit! quid his praeclarius? quid eorum opere difficilius? sed incidit in laqueum dicens: quia non sum sicut peccator iste et publicanus et infelix hoc uitio ex ingentibus operibus cecidit in crimen et insolens per hanc uirtutum suarum gloriam factus iustificato magis publicano recessit.
Though the other works of faith may be splendid and devotion may persist in every keeping of divine things, yet if pride creeps in, the memory of what we do rightly will be wiped out. With what labor that man in the gospel set himself on the way of life, so as not to grab what belonged to others, not to wrong anyone, not to be undone by adulteries! He labored fasting twice on the Sabbath, and wore down his body by abstinence from food with great strength. With what labor, then, to conquer greed, he gave a tenth of his substance for the use of the needy! What is more splendid than these? What harder to do? But he fell into the snare, saying, "that I am not like this sinner and tax collector"; and through this vice the unhappy man fell from great works into crime, and made insolent by this glory of his virtues, he went away less justified than the tax collector.
118.3.16CSEL 22:386–387
Sed quid de dicimus? apostolus non ab hominibus neque per hominem, sed per Iesum Christum, aduersus quem diabolus omni uirtutis suae arte luctatus est, angelum, qui se colaphizaret, accepit, ut per passionum omnium indefessas molestias nulla superbiendi occasio per otium temporis inrepere. ipse quoque eligendi et constituendi sacerdotis quandam legem ferens, cum iam eum in quibus episcopum dignum est. conlocasset, neophytum eligi uetuit. ne superbiret, dicens: non, ne inflatus incidat in iudicium diaboli: id est, ne per recens adeptam regenerationis gratiam insolescat, illum multo passionum bello ante, uult multis et fidei stipendiis. cor enim humiliatum deus non spernit et sacrificium optimum cor contribulatum; quia qui se exaltet, humiliabitur; et qui se humiliat, exaltabitur.
But what do we say of others? The apostle, called not from men nor through a man but through Jesus Christ, against whom the devil wrestled with every art of his power, received an angel to buffet him, so that through the unwearying troubles of every suffering no occasion for pride might creep in through a time of ease. He too, laying down a kind of law for choosing and appointing a priest, after setting out the qualities in which a bishop is worthy, forbade a newly baptized man to be chosen, lest he become proud, saying: "Not a new convert, lest being puffed up he fall into the judgment of the devil": that is, lest he grow insolent through the grace of regeneration lately received; he wants him to be tried beforehand by a long war of sufferings and by many campaigns of faith. For God does not despise a humbled heart, and a contrite heart is the best sacrifice; because whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted.
118.3.17CSEL 22:387–388
Et idcirco maledicti, qui declinant a mandatis tuis, quia increpantur superbi: quia per superbiam animi insolentis et humana despicimus et diuina neglegimus. sed uerbi hic conlocati non neglegenter est audienda. promptum enim fuerat dicere: maledicti, qui non obtemperant mandatis tuis. de uno et de plurimis mandatis in superiore uersu conpetentia diximus. maledicti autem sunt, qui per hanc doctrinam eruditi a mandatis dei declinant, id est per uitiorum praesentium desideria ab spe aeternorum mandatorum decidunt. qui enim declinat, id, in quo est, deuitat et ex alia parte in aliam deducitur et deflexu quodam de itinere decedit. uel leuiter ergo declinantem a mandatis dei maledictionis sententia conprehendit, ut intellegeremus, quanti periculi res esset, ea omnino ignorare nos, a quibus declinare maledictum est.
And so "cursed are those who turn aside from your commandments," because the proud are rebuked: because through the pride of an insolent mind we both despise human things and neglect divine ones. But the force of the word placed here must not be heard carelessly. For it would have been easy to say, "Cursed are those who do not obey your commandments." We said what was fitting in an earlier verse about one commandment and many. But those are cursed who, having been instructed in this teaching, turn aside from God's commandments, that is, who fall away from the hope of the eternal commandments through desires for present vices. For one who turns aside avoids the place where he is, is led from one side to another, and leaves the road by a kind of swerving. So the sentence of the curse takes hold even of one who turns aside slightly from God's commandments, so that we might understand how dangerous a thing it would be for us to be wholly ignorant of those things from which it is cursed to turn aside.
118.3.18CSEL 22:388
obprobrium et contemptum, quia testimonia tua exquisiui. peccata obprobrio sunt digna; et idcirco peccatores exsurgent in obprobrium aeternum. quod autem peccata omnia obprobrio sint digna, in euangeliis discamus, tum cum dominus exprobrare ciuitatibus illis, in quibus plures uirtutes eius effectae essent nec paenituissent, et Bethsaida. quod ab illis, necesse est ut in omnes eiusdem criminis pares fiat, et tunc humano generi exprobret non paenitenti neque in uiam euangelicam pergenti id, quod psalmo continetur: quae utilitas in sanguine meo, dum descendo in corruptionem? exprobrat enim superbis atque maledictis, cur nihil in sacramento sanguinis. sui atque mortis utilitatis esse existimauerint, cum ille nostri causa et natus et passus et sit.
"Take away from me reproach and contempt, because I have sought your testimonies." Sins are worthy of reproach; and therefore sinners will rise to everlasting reproach. That all sins are worthy of reproach we may learn in the gospels, when the Lord reproached those cities in which many of his mighty works had been done and they had not repented, Chorazin and Bethsaida. What he did to them must be done to all who are equal in the same crime; and then he will reproach the human race, which does not repent nor go on in the way of the gospel, with what is contained in the psalm: "What profit is there in my blood, while I go down to corruption?" For he reproaches the proud and cursed for thinking there was no profit in the mystery of his blood and death, although he was born and suffered and rose for our sake.
118.3.19CSEL 22:388–389
Tenuit etiam propheta rationem infirmitatis humanae. scit inesse quaedam, quae per misericordiam dei auferenda a nobis sint. scit deum tali peccatorum nostrorum confessione orandum, ut, etsi digna habeamus, non tamen arguamur; confitendum enim crimen est, ut et uenia. scit deinde post arguitionem in contemptum, id est in nihilum gentes; quia scriptum est: omnes gentes nihil sunt, et omnia, sunt, in nihilum sunt. sed secundum prophetae exemplum auferri a nobis obprobrium et contemptum hac spe, hac fiducia deprecari nos oportet, ut addamus ad id, quod dicitur: aufers a me obprobrium et contemptum, id, quod sequitur: quia testimonia tua exquisiui. et testimonia dei exquirit, ut argui non debeat, et auferri a se obprobrium contemptumque precatur, ut uerecundiam non derelinquat: esse quidem in natura sua confessus arguitionis et obprobrii causam, quam a se deprecatur auferri, sed per deuotionem exquisitorum testimoniorum eam sperat auferri.
The prophet also kept in view the reason of human weakness. He knows that there are certain things in us which must be taken away by God's mercy. He knows that God must be prayed to with such confession of our sins that, even if we have what deserves it, we may not be rebuked; for a crime must be confessed so that there may also be pardon. He knows then that after rebuke the nations go into contempt, that is, into nothing; for it is written: "All the nations are nothing, and all that they are is counted as nothing." But after the prophet's example we must pray that reproach and contempt be taken away from us with this hope and this confidence, adding to the words "Take away from me reproach and contempt" what follows: "because I have sought your testimonies." He seeks God's testimonies so that he need not be rebuked, and he prays that reproach and contempt be taken from him so that he may not abandon modesty: confessing indeed that in his nature there is a cause for rebuke and reproach, which he prays to have taken away from him, but hoping that it will be taken away through devotion to the testimonies he has sought.
118.3.20CSEL 22:389–390
Exquirit autem testimonia dei propheta non in otio, neque in insolentia rerum secundarum, sed exquirit multis aduersum se residentibus, multis aduersum se conloquentibus dicens: etenim sederunt principes et aduersum me detrahebant. scit omnem prophetiae fidem mundi huius perosam esse principibus; scit et apostolos cunctis futuros propter Christianum nomen odiosos. sedent aduersus prophetam principes et detrahunt tunc, cum audiunt Esaiam dicentem: audite uerbum domini principes Sodomum, et intendite legem dei populus. ex consilio enim talium Esaias sectus est, Hieremias quoque carcere clauditur, Daniel leonibus fame ad incitatis obicitur, inter templum et altare occiditur, apostoli caeduntur, desecantur, crucifiguntur, ut dei auferatur, ut doctrina inhibeatur, ut aeternae uia. sed hos principum consessus et haec obtrectationum eloquia spreuit fides constans. consequitur enim: seruus autem tuus exercebar in iustificationibus tuis. obstrepentibus illis uidelicet et totis armis inhibentibus, in exercitationibus iustificationum dei spiritus perseuerat.
The prophet seeks God's testimonies not in leisure nor in the insolence of prosperity, but while many sit against him and many talk against him, saying: "For princes sat and spoke against me." He knows that all the faith of prophecy is hateful to the princes of this world; he knows too that the apostles will be hated by all for the Christian name. Princes sit against the prophet and speak against him when they hear Isaiah saying: "Hear the word of the Lord, princes of Sodom, and attend to the law of God, you people." By the counsel of such men Isaiah was sawn in two, Jeremiah too was shut in prison, Daniel was thrown to lions stirred up by hunger, Zechariah was killed between the temple and the altar, the apostles are beaten, cut down, crucified, so that the word of God may be taken away, that teaching may be stopped, that the way of eternal life may be blocked. But steadfast faith scorned these assemblies of princes and these words of slander. For there follows: "But your servant was exercised in your justifications." While they roared and blocked him with all their arms, the spirit persevered in the exercises of God's justifications.
118.3.21CSEL 22:390
Sed, superius tractauimus, exercitatio iustificationum et meditatio testimoniorum illa est, quia, cum legis opera per corporales efficientias exerceantur. exercitatione, tamen et testimoniorum meditatione bonorum aeternorum per praesentium meditationem quaedam praeparatio conparatur. sed testimoniorum meditatio unde oriatur, ostendit. adiecit enim: et consilia mea iustificationes tuae, omnem scilicet curam, omnes consiliorum uarios diuersosque motus intentos esse iustificationibus confitens dei in Christo Iesu, cui est gloria in saecula. amen.
But, as we discussed above, the exercise of justifications and the meditation on testimonies is this: although the works of the law are exercised through bodily acts, yet by exercise and by meditation on the testimonies a kind of preparation for eternal goods is gained through meditation on present things. But he shows where the meditation on the testimonies arises from. For he added: "And your justifications are my counsel," confessing that every care, all the various and diverse movements of his counsels, are intent on the justifications of God in Christ Jesus, to whom be glory for ever. Amen.
Tractates 118, chapter 4
118.4.1CSEL 22:390–391
Multiplex intellegentia non potest in se habere dictorum difficultatem, cum amota omni obscuritate intellegendi magis abundet electio, ut in primo quartae uersu contuemur. ait enim: pauimento anima mea: uiuifica me secundum uerbum tuum. potest istud et de adsiduitate orationis intellegi, tamquam ex peccatorum confessione in terram propheta prostratus pauimento. sed ut altius aliquid sub his dictis intellegamus, perspecta diligentius uerborum uirtute necessarium ducimus. non enim ait: adhaesi, sed ait: pauimento anima mea, et admonemur intellegere hic eum esse de animae et corporis societate conquestum. et multa sunt, quae nos ut hoc potius probabile existimemus admoneant. dixit enim apostolus: corpus humiliationis, dixit et propheta: humiliata est in puluere anima mea, dixit rursum: et in puluerem mortis deduxisti me. igitur, uel quia in terrae huius solo, uel quia ex terra instituti conformatique, anima, quae alterius originis est, corporis adhaesisse creditur, maximum ipsa certamen suscipiens, ut se, manens in eo, ab eius societate diuellat, ut tamquam peregrina incolatu eius utatur.
A manifold understanding cannot hold difficulty in its words, since, with all obscurity of understanding removed, the choice is all the more abundant, as we see in the first verse of the fourth letter. For he says: "My soul has cleaved to the pavement; give me life according to your word." This can be understood of persistence in prayer, as though the prophet, through confession of sins, were lying prostrate on the ground, on the pavement. But in order to understand something deeper under these words, we think it necessary to examine the force of the words more carefully. For he does not say, "I have cleaved," but "My soul has cleaved to the pavement"; and we are prompted to understand that here he is complaining of the fellowship of soul and body. And there are many things that prompt us to think this the more probable. For the apostle said, "the body of humiliation"; and the prophet said, "My soul is humbled in the dust"; and again: "And you have brought me down into the dust of death." So, either because it is on the ground of this earth, or because it was formed and shaped from the earth, the soul, which is of another origin, is believed to have cleaved to the body, undertaking the greatest struggle itself: that while remaining in it, it may tear itself away from fellowship with it, so as to use its dwelling as a stranger.
118.4.2CSEL 22:391–392
Non ignarus est autem propheta, licet anterior aetate, apostolici tamen dicti, quia, qui adhaerent domino,. scit etiam a se: post te anima mea. quin etiam legit in lege: post dominum deum tuum ambulabis et adhaerebis ipsi. igitur huic magis quam illi concupiscit. sed quia meminit ex consortio eius nonnullam se labem contraxisse peccati, orat, ut per uerbum dei, quamuis admixta terrenae mortalique naturae anima eius sit, ipse tamen in uitam caelestis animetur. scit enim nn se nunc pauimento adhaerere, non uiuere: sed secundum uerbum dei, cui mortui uiuunt, orat, ut uiuificetur in uitam.
The prophet, though earlier in time, is not ignorant of the apostle's saying, that those who cleave to the Lord are one spirit with him. He knows also from himself: "My soul has cleaved after you." Indeed he reads in the law: "You shall walk after the Lord your God and cleave to him." So he longs to cleave to him rather than to the body. But because he remembers that he has contracted some stain of sin from its fellowship, he prays that through the word of God, although his soul is mingled with an earthly and mortal nature, he himself may be quickened into heavenly life. For he knows that he now cleaves to the ground and does not live; but according to the word of God, for whom the dead live, he prays to be quickened into life.
118.4.3CSEL 22:392
Dehinc sequitur: uias meas pronuntiaui, et exaudisti me; doce me iustificationes tuas. qui secundum uoluptates corporis uitam agunt, in uiis suis ambulant. qui autem omni uitiorum carnalium consuetudine derelicta in dei degunt, iam illis non in sua, sed in uia dei iter est. et hoc audiamus in Deuteronomii sed r a quid dominus deus tuus poscit a te, nisi ut timeas dominum deum tuum et ambules in omnibus uiis eius et diligas eum et seruias domino deo tuo ex toto corde tuo et ex tota anima tua et custodias praecepta domini dei tui et iustificationes eius, quae ego praecipio tibi hodie, ut bene sit tibi? ergo deo adhaerens in dei uia est.
Then follows: "I declared my ways, and you heard me; teach me your justifications." Those who live according to the pleasures of the body walk in their own ways. But those who have left behind every habit of fleshly vices and live in the way of God no longer travel in their own way but in God's way. Let us hear this too in Deuteronomy: "And now, Israel, what does the Lord your God ask of you, but that you fear the Lord your God and walk in all his ways and love him and serve the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul, and keep the precepts of the Lord your God and his justifications, which I command you today, that it may be well with you?" So one who cleaves to God is in God's way.
118.4.4CSEL 22:392–393
Et qua ratione prophetam hic locutum existimabimus dicentem: uias meas pronuntiaui, et exaudisti me; doce me iustificationes tuas? si enim uias suas praedicat, necesse est peccati uias praedicet, quia in uia peccati sit, quisque in dei uia non sit. sed huic praesenti dicto consentiens illud uidetur, quod dictum est: pronuntiabo aduersum me iniustitias meas, domine, et rursum: iustus in exordio sermonis sui ipse sui accusator est. ergo hic pronuntiatio, quae dicitur, non laudatio est, sed confessio uiarum suarum, id est peccatorum suorum paenitens professio; et propheta, ut dignus spiritu prophetiae, uias suas, id est peccati ante confessus est, ut post hanc pronuntiationem earum doctrinae iustificationum dei capax esset. quod utrumque docetur. nam cum dicit: pronuntiaui, confessionem hanc temporis esse demonstrat; cum dicit: doce me, oratio est ex futuro, quia confitendum ante est de peccatis et exacta confessione discendum.
And on what reasoning shall we think the prophet spoke here, saying: "I declared my ways, and you heard me; teach me your justifications"? For if he proclaims his own ways, he must be proclaiming ways of sin, because whoever is not in God's way is in the way of sin. But in agreement with this present saying seems to be what was said: "I will declare my iniquities against myself, Lord," and again: "The righteous man at the beginning of his speech is his own accuser." So the declaring spoken of here is not praise but confession of his ways, that is, a penitent profession of his sins; and the prophet, as one worthy of the spirit of prophecy, first confessed his ways, that is, the ways of sin, so that after this declaring of them he might be capable of the teaching of God's justifications. Both are taught. For when he says "I declared," he shows that this confession belongs to past time; when he says "teach me," it is a prayer for the future, because one must first confess one's sins, and after the confession is made, learn.
118.4.5CSEL 22:393–394
Manens autem propheta in lege non ex his doceri se postulat, corporali tunc ministerio gerebantur, sed ex his, quae per speciem praesentium futuri erant sacramenta conplexa. iustificationum tuarum fac ut intellegam, et exercebor in mirabilibus tuis. sermo praesens discreuisse cognoscitur iustificationes a uia earum. et quantum re ipsa intellegitur, omne quidem, ad quod per uiam tenditur, non idem est, quod et uia ipsa, qua pergitur. quaerenda igitur causa est, cur propheta praestari sibi, ut uiam iustificationum intellegat potius, quam ut ipsas iustificationes cognoscat,. meminit etenim omnes iustificationes legis umbram in se sanctarum iustificationum continere: cum post sexennii seruitutem Hebraeus puer liber est, cum septimi anni fructus indigentibus et pecoribus terrae relincuntur, cum post quinquagesimum annum omnia in ius eius, unde decesserint, reuertuntur. et quia haec, quae in lege sunt constituta, uia est eorum, quorum in his praeformatur exemplum, uiam harum iustificationum ut intellegens in mirabilibus dei exerceatur, orat, id est in legis operibus uersetur: quia lex sit ad futurorum bonorum speculum constituta.
The prophet, remaining in the law, does not ask to be taught from the things then carried out by bodily ministry, but from those which, under the form of present things, embraced the mysteries of the future. "Make me understand the way of your justifications, and I will be exercised in your wonders." The present saying is seen to have distinguished the justifications from their way. And as far as is understood from the thing itself, everything toward which one heads by a way is not the same as the way itself by which one goes. So we must seek the reason why the prophet asks to be granted to understand the way of the justifications rather than to know the justifications themselves. For he remembers that all the justifications of the law contain in themselves a shadow of holy justifications: when a Hebrew boy is free after six years of slavery, when the fruits of the seventh year are left to the needy and the beasts of the land, when after the fiftieth year all things return to the ownership from which they had departed. And because these things laid down in the law are the way of those things whose pattern is prefigured in them, he prays that, understanding the way of these justifications, he may be exercised in God's wonders, that is, be occupied in the works of the law: because the law was set up as a mirror of good things to come.
118.4.6CSEL 22:394–395
De consequenti uersu conperi multos uaria sensisse, eo quod non eadem proprietate a ceteris translatoribus ex hebrseo demutatus esset, ut ab his septuaginta interpretantibus conscriptus est. nonnulli enim pro eo, quod ab illis dictum est: ἐνύσταξεν ἡ ψυχή μου, posuerunt: ἔσταξεν ἡ ψυχή μου.. quidam autem ex illis non ἐνύσταξεν, sed κατέσταξεν transtulit. et aliud ἐνύσταξεν, aliud ἔσταξεν, aliud κατέσταξεν significare intellegitur. sed nobis neque tutum est translationem septuaginta interpretum transgredi, et sane ratio et sensus dictorum ita admonet, ut recte ac probabiliter uersum translatum intellegamus. est enim cum illis et ita: dormitauit anima mea prae taedio. et superior omnis sermo et consequens humilitatis et infirmitatis confessionem in se habet: cum pauimento anima, cum peccatorum confitentur, cum intellegentiam uiae iustificationum orat. consequens ergo est, ut nunc animam suam prae taedio mortalis habitaculi dormitare conquestus sit, quae nondum iustificationum uiam intellegat, quae etiam nunc pauimento. atque ob id in uiis dei confirmandum sese orat, quia prae taedio dormitet.
On the following verse I have found that many have thought various things, because it was not rendered from the Hebrew by the other translators with the same exactness as it was written by the seventy translators. For some, in place of what they said, ἐνύσταξεν ἡ ψυχή μου ("my soul slumbered"), put ἔσταξεν ἡ ψυχή μου ("my soul dripped"); and one of them translated not ἐνύσταξεν but κατέσταξεν ("dripped down"). And it is understood that ἐνύσταξεν means one thing, ἔσταξεν another, κατέσταξεν another. But it is not safe for us to go beyond the translation of the seventy translators, and certainly the reason and sense of the words prompt us to understand that the verse was rightly and plausibly translated. For it stands with them thus: "My soul has slumbered from weariness." And all the preceding and following discourse contains the confession of humility and weakness: when his soul cleaves to the ground, when he confesses his sins, when he prays for understanding of the way of the justifications. It follows, then, that he now complains that his soul slumbers from weariness of its mortal dwelling, a soul which does not yet understand the way of the justifications and which even now cleaves to the ground. And therefore he prays to be strengthened in God's ways, because he slumbers from weariness.
118.4.7CSEL 22:395
Sed hic ea ratio seruata est, ut dormitare se, non dormire dicat; quia qui dormit, in ipso somni opere est, qui autem dormitat, antequam dormiat, dormitat. quae et in alio loco ratio seruata est, cum dicit: ecce non dormit neque dormitabit, qui custodit Israhel. sed et illic, ubi meminit: si dedero somnum oculis meis et palpebris meis dormitationem, dormitationem palpebrarum, somnum uero esse dixit oculorum, quia palpebrarum officium est, ut somnum ex dormitatione concilient. propheta igitur, etsi dormitat, non tamen dormit; atque ob id, ne dormitans obdormiat, subiecit: confirma me in uerbis tuis: id est ut per omnium iustificationum, quas superius memorauit, intellegentiam confirmatus non modo non dormiat, sed iam sine aliqua dormitatione peruigilet.
But here this distinction is kept, that he says he slumbers, not that he sleeps; because one who sleeps is in the very act of sleep, while one who slumbers slumbers before he sleeps. This distinction is kept in another place too, when he says: "Behold, he who keeps Israel will neither sleep nor slumber." And there too, where he says: "If I give sleep to my eyes and slumber to my eyelids," he called slumber that of the eyelids, but sleep that of the eyes, because it is the office of the eyelids to bring on sleep out of slumber. So the prophet, though he slumbers, does not sleep; and therefore, lest slumbering he fall asleep, he added: "Strengthen me in your words": that is, that strengthened through understanding of all the justifications he mentioned above, he may not only not sleep but may now keep watch without any slumbering.
118.4.8CSEL 22:395–396
Ait autem: uiam iniquitatis amoue a me et lege tua miserere mei. promptum fuerat dicere: iniquitatem a me; sed licet infirmitatis suae conscius, cum meminerit in corpore suo uiam inesse peccandi, tamen per timorem dei peccati omnis alienus est. uiam igitur peccati, qua ad peccatum pergere promptum est, amoueri a se deprecatur, id est omnia corporalium uoluptatum desideria auferri, nec temptationem aliquam aut ignorantiae, qua tamquam per uiam ad peccatum itur, ingruere. nec solum id orat deum, sed etiam, ut per legem suam misereatur eius. per legem autem hoc modo misericordiam consequitur, quia, ut superius ostendi, ita in lege est scriptum: et nunc Israhel quid dominus deus tuus poscit a te, nisi ut timeas dominum deum tuum et ambules in omnibus uiis eius et diligas eum et seruias domino deo tuo ex toto corde tuo et ex tota anima tua et custodias domini dei tui et iustificationes eius, quae ego tibi hodie, ut bene sit tibi! ergo cum lex doceat in uiis dei ambulandum, ut ambulanti in his bene in posterum sit, et nunc propheta oret uias iniustitiae a se amoueri sibique ut deus misereatur ex lege, id orat, quod lege conclusum est, ut in uiis dei ambulans in beatitudine collocetur.
He says: "Remove from me the way of iniquity, and in your law have mercy on me." It would have been easy to say, "Remove iniquity from me"; but though conscious of his weakness, since he remembers that the way of sinning is in his body, yet through the fear of God he is a stranger to all sin. So he prays that the way of sin, by which it is easy to go on to sin, be removed from him, that is, that all desires for bodily pleasures be taken away, and that no temptation of … or of ignorance, by which one goes to sin as by a way, may assail him. And he prays God not only for this, but also that he have mercy on him through his law. He obtains mercy through the law in this way, because, as I showed above, it is written thus in the law: "And now, Israel, what does the Lord your God ask of you, but that you fear the Lord your God and walk in all his ways and love him and serve the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul, and keep the precepts of the Lord your God and his justifications, which I command you today, that it may be well with you!" So since the law teaches that one must walk in God's ways so that it may be well hereafter with the one who walks in them, and now the prophet prays that the ways of unrighteousness be removed from him and that God have mercy on him according to the law, he prays for what is concluded in the law: that walking in God's ways he may be placed in blessedness.
118.4.9CSEL 22:396–397
Dehinc sequitur: uiam ueritatis dilexi et iudicia tua non sum oblitus. uiam diligunt multi, sed non omnes diligunt ueritatis. et quicumque aut uoluptatum aut diuitiarum aut honorum uiam ineunt, sed et qui doctrinis uagi et incerti et impii differuntur, in uia quidem sunt, sed non sunt in uia ueritatis. sed propheta ex spiritu eius loquitur, qui corpore dicturus postea erat: ego sum uia, ueritas, uita. et quia hoc iudicium est, secundum quod in euangeliis continetur: hoc enim iudicium est, ut, qui credit in me, habeat uitam aeternam, merito propheta ait: uiam ueritatis dilexi et iudicia tua non sum oblitus. nobis enim haec ad cognitionem posterius dicta sunt; sed propheta in his et uiuit et loquitur.
Then follows: "I have loved the way of truth, and I have not forgotten your judgments." Many love a way, but not all love the way of truth. Whoever enters the way of pleasures or of riches or of honors, and those too who are carried about by wandering, uncertain, and impious teachings, are indeed on a way, but they are not on the way of truth. But the prophet speaks from the Spirit of him who was afterwards to say in the body: "I am the way, the truth, the life." And because this is judgment, as it is contained in the gospels, "For this is the judgment, that whoever believes in me has eternal life," the prophet rightly says: "I have loved the way of truth, and I have not forgotten your judgments." For these things were spoken to us later for our knowledge; but the prophet both lives and speaks in them.
118.4.10CSEL 22:397
Cohaeret autem sibi doctrinae et confessionis sermo; ait enim: testimoniis tuis. domine, noli me confundere, quia ueterum et anteriorum peccatorum ueniam testimoniis domini adhaerendo sit meritus. scit enim uerbis dei dictum esse: ecce e am ut nubem iniustitias tuas et tamquam nebulam peccata tua. dominus potens est omnia ea. in nobis pudoris et confusionis sunt, amouere, si et nos dicere cum libertate possimus: testimoniis tuis. his enim adhaerentes a confusione pudendorum et anteriorum criminum liberamur.
The discourse of teaching and of confession holds together; for he says: "I have cleaved to your testimonies; Lord, do not put me to shame," because by cleaving to the Lord's testimonies he has deserved pardon for old and earlier sins. For he knows that it was said in God's words: "Behold, I have blotted out your iniquities like a cloud, and your sins like a mist." The Lord is able to remove all those things in us that belong to shame and confusion, if we too can say with freedom: "I have cleaved to your testimonies." For cleaving to these we are set free from the confusion of shameful and earlier crimes.
118.4.11CSEL 22:397
Sed concluduntur omnia suo ordine. suis rebus. superius enim ait: uiam amoue a me, deinde subiecit: uiam ueritatis dilexi, tertium id sequitur: testimoniis tuis. nunc deinde ita finit: in uia praeceptorum tuorum cucurri, cum dilatasti cor meum. pergradus ad id uentum est. iniquitatis, uiae ueritatis dilectae testimoniorum indiuisibili societate, ut in uia mandatorum dei curreretur. sed uia, quae ducit ad uitam, et angusta et tribulata est; angusta, quia diligenter et caute in ea ingrediendum est; tribulata. quia per multas tribulationes et passiones aditur. et insolens propheta existimabitur, qui se hanc uiam currere glorietur?
But all things are concluded in their order and in their matters. For above he said, "Remove the way from me"; then he added, "I have loved the way of truth"; third follows, "I have cleaved to your testimonies." Now he ends thus: "I ran in the way of your commandments, when you enlarged my heart." Step by step he has come to this: from the removal of the way of iniquity, the love of the way of truth, and the inseparable fellowship of the testimonies, to running in the way of God's commandments. But the way that leads to life is both narrow and afflicted: narrow, because one must enter it carefully and cautiously; afflicted, because it is approached through many afflictions and sufferings. And will the prophet be thought insolent, who boasts that he runs this way?
118.4.12CSEL 22:397–399
Meminit autem inter studium et humilitatis confessionem sermonum suorum moderandam esse uirtutem. idcirco, posteaquam dixerat: in uia mandatorum tuorum cucurri, hoc addidit: cum dilatasti cor meum. tatum est cor, quod per fidem capax doctrinae dei panditur. et hoc de credentibus dictum est: et inhabitabo et in his. cor igitur dilatatur, in quo sacramentum patris et filii residet, in quo capaci habitatione sanctus spiritus delectatur. meminit et Salomon dicens: sapientia in exitibus canitur, in plateis cum libertate agit. uerbi utriusque huius latinitas nostra uel obscuritatem nobis adfert uel alterius intellegentiae opinionem praebet. nam quod nos in exitibus dicimus, ex transtulit. et exodum proprie est, ubi ex multis angustis uiis in unam patentem uiam coitur. quod uero nos plateas nuncupamus, eodem nomine graecitas nuncupauit. sed plateas latitudines esse graecus sermo designat, et nos putamus has esse urbium uias. ergo sapientia, quae Christus est, in uia illa, in quam nobis ex multis egressus est, canitur; in latitudinibus autem cum libertate agit, in quibus non solum habitare, sed etiam deambulaturam se esse promisit. ergo uiam domini propheta libere currit, posteaquam dilatato corde esse coepit. non enim ante potuit uiam dei currere, quam ipse ille digna et ampla dei efficeretur habitatio. amen.
But he remembers that between zeal and the confession of humility the force of his words must be tempered. Therefore, after he had said, "I ran in the way of your commandments," he added this: "when you enlarged my heart." The heart is enlarged which is opened through faith to receive God's teaching. And this was said of believers: "And I will dwell and walk among them." So the heart is enlarged in which the mystery of the Father and the Son resides, in which the Holy Spirit delights in a roomy dwelling. Solomon too remembers this, saying: "Wisdom is sung in the exits; in the streets she acts with freedom." Our Latin for each of these two words either brings us obscurity or gives the impression of another meaning. For what we call "in the exits" was translated from the Greek, and an exodos is properly where one comes together out of many narrow ways into one open way. What we call plateas, Greek called by the same name; but the Greek word plateai means broad places, and we think these are the streets of cities. So Wisdom, who is Christ, is sung in that way into which there is an exit for us out of many; and in the broad places she acts with freedom, in which she promised not only to dwell but also to walk about. So the prophet runs the Lord's way freely, after he began to have an enlarged heart. For he could not run the way of God until he himself was made a worthy and spacious dwelling of God. Amen.
Tractates 118, chapter 5
118.5.1CSEL 22:399
Inusitatam ac nouam deprecationem prophetae in primo quintae litterae uersu inuenimus. ita enim coepit: legem, domine, uiam iustificationum tuarum; sed rationem consequi uersus huius ex latina interpretatione difficile est. per condicionem enim communis sermonis nostri non ita absolute potuit uirtus uerbi et hebraici et graeci explicari. Graeci namque ex transtulerunt:, KVQVS, TCOV GOV. orat enim in hoc uersu, ut sibi lex statuatur iustificationum; et quod graece est, ad eiusdem sensus intellegentiam latinitas explicare non potuit. propheta ergo orat, ut uiae iustificationum suarum legem sibi dominus constituat, id est, ut qua lege uiam iustificationum dei, intellegat et sciat. non enim tantum ait, sed uiae postulat legem.
In the first verse of the fifth letter we find an unusual and new prayer of the prophet. For he began thus: "Set for me a law, Lord, the way of your justifications"; but it is hard to follow the reasoning of this verse from the Latin translation. For by the condition of our ordinary speech the force of both the Hebrew and the Greek word could not be expressed so completely. For the Greeks translated: "νομοθέτησόν με, κύριε, τὴν ὁδὸν τῶν δικαιωμάτων σου" ("give me a law, Lord, as the way of your justifications"). For in this verse he prays that a law of justifications be set for him; and what is in the Greek, Latin could not express for the understanding of the same sense. So the prophet prays that the Lord set for him a law for the way of his justifications, that is, that by a law he may understand and know the way of God's justifications. For he does not say only "a law", but asks for a law of the way.
118.5.2CSEL 22:399–400
Et quae tandem iustificationum lex erit? nam in communibus et in terrenis uiis legem meminimus esse in spatii mensuris, cum passuum mille interuallo quaedam legis uiae signa statuuntur, cum mansionum requies disponitur, cum usque ad urbem refectioni uiantium congrua rursum mansionum interualla dimensa sunt. sed etiam tum, cum ex Aegypto populus per rubrum mare pedes transiit, legem quandam fuisse meminimus ei non humani arbitrii iudicio, sed diuini constitutam in columna ignis et nubis. nam cum oporteret populum iter agere, columna ignis nocturno tempore anteibat, de die uero columna nubis. at cum placitum deo fuisset diu in iisdem castris populum contineri, columna neque ignis noctu prouehebatur neque nubis de die anteibat. legem itaque hanc statuit. et si diligenter stationes eas mansionesque castrorum et condiciones locorum, quae Exodo continentur, retractemus, magna in ipsis caelestis itineris mirabilia cernemus. ob quod frequenter propheta orauit dicens: considerabo mirabilia de lege tua. sed iam non istis se legibus contineri propheta orat; non enim legem, sed uiae iustificationum poscit.
And what, after all, will be the law of the justifications? For in common, earthly roads we remember there is a law in the measures of distance, when certain markers of the road's law are set at intervals of a thousand paces, when resting places are arranged, when intervals between stations suited to the refreshment of travellers are measured out again all the way to the city. But also when the people crossed from Egypt through the Red Sea on foot, we remember there was a certain law set for them, not by the judgment of human choice but of divine, in the pillar of fire and cloud. For when the people had to journey, the pillar of fire went before them at night, and the pillar of cloud by day. But when it pleased God that the people be kept long in the same camp, neither did the pillar of fire move forward by night nor did the pillar of cloud go before them by day. So he set this law. And if we carefully go over those stations and camp sites and the conditions of the places contained in Exodus, we shall see great wonders of the heavenly journey in them. For this reason the prophet often prayed, saying: "I will consider wonders out of your law." But now the prophet does not pray to be held by these laws; for he asks not for a law, but for a law of the way of the justifications.
118.5.3CSEL 22:400–401
Scit esse uiam testimoniorum, cum dicit: in uia testimoniorum tuorum delectatus sum. scit esse praeceptorum, cum ait: in uia praeceptorum tuorum cucurri. nouit esse uiam legis, cum beati sint, qui in lege domini. scit esse hanc uiam iustificationum de qua nunc deprecatur. scit etiam esse uiam in prophetis, scit esse uiam in euangeliis, scit esse uiam in apostolis, de quibus saepe testatus est. ergo per legem huius usque in perfectam illam uiam tendere. plures enim sunt, qui uiam legis inprobant, plures qui prophetarum, multi qui euangeliorum, multi qui apostolorum. scimus enim quosdam non omnibus his uiis esse.. sed scriba doctus nouit diuitis patrisfamilias exemplo de thensauris proferre uetera et noua. hanc igitur iustificationum legem propheta desiderat. lex enim quibusdam religiosi cordis disciplinis continetur et intra fines nos constitutionis suae, quibus se uteremur, artauit, ne excedentes eos ad opiniones euagaremur. non uult igitur ab ea lege excedere, quam constitui sibi orat.
He knows that there is a way of the testimonies, when he says: "I delighted in the way of your testimonies." He knows there is a way of the commandments, when he says: "I ran in the way of your commandments." He knows there is a way of the law, since blessed are those who walk in the law of the Lord. He knows there is this way of the justifications, for which he now prays. He knows too that there is a way in the prophets, a way in the gospels, a way in the apostles, to which he has often borne witness. So he wants by the law of this way to stretch all the way to that perfect way. For there are many who reject the way of the law, many that of the prophets, many that of the gospels, many that of the apostles. For we know that some are not in all these ways. But the learned scribe knows, by the example of the rich householder, how to bring out of the treasures things old and new. This law of the justifications, then, the prophet desires. For the law is contained in certain disciplines of a devout heart, and it has confined us within the bounds of its ordinance, which we are to use, lest by going beyond them we wander off into opinions. So he does not want to go beyond that law which he prays to have set for him.
118.5.4CSEL 22:401–402
Sed in quam hanc legem orat institui? scilicet ut exquirat eam. lex erat iustificationum per Moysen scripta, et hanc propheta operibus exercebat non ergo hanc statui sibi orat, iam statuta erat et ab eo religiose agebatur, sed eam, quam optat inquirere. quid ergo optat inquirere? finem scilicet legis. et quis erit finis legis? apostolum audiamus: finis enim legis Christus est. sed per has iustificationum uias, quibus statuta lex fuerit, finem legis optat exquirere, neque solum exquirere, sed semper exquirere. ait enim ita: exquiram eam semper. officium exquirendi non suffecerat per uoluntatem, nisi etiam indefessa ab eo temporis continuatione gereretur.
But into what law does he pray to be instructed? Clearly, so that he may seek it out. There was a law of justifications written through Moses, and the prophet exercised it in works; so he does not pray for this to be set for him, since it was already set and was being devoutly carried out by him, but for the one he wishes to seek out. What, then, does he wish to seek out? The end of the law, clearly. And what will the end of the law be? Let us hear the apostle: "For Christ is the end of the law." But through these ways of the justifications, by which the law was set, he wishes to seek out the end of the law; and not only to seek it out, but always to seek it out. For he says thus: "And I will seek it out always." The duty of seeking out would not have been enough by an act of will, unless it were also carried on by him in an unwearied continuance of time.
118.5.5CSEL 22:402–403
In prouerbiis Salomonis scriptum meminimus: inintellegenti sapientiam interroganti sapientia deputatur. quo sensu id ostendi uidetur, quod, qui non intellegat et sapienter interroget, sapere credatur. hoc itaque eo proficit, quia propheta in lege manens et secundum apostolum ex octauo die circumcisus et secundum genus ex tribu Iuda et secundum gratiam corporeae unctionis et rex electus et Christus et secundum sacramentum natiuitatis dignus, cuius filius Iesus Christus esset, tamquam peregrinus legis orat: da mihi intellectum, et scrutabo legem tuam et seruabo eam in toto corde meo. nondum ergo seruat, nondum scrutatus est, nondum intellegit. non ergo de ea lege loquitur, in qua natus est, eruditus est, operatus est, propheta. sciens itaque primam partem esse prudentiae, ut quis, quod non intellegit, sapienter interroget, ut, quod ignorat, intellegat: idcirco intellectum ut accipiat rogat: sciens uero adepto spiritu intellegendi studio opus esse ait: et scrutabo legem tuam. autem fructum in repertae rei custodia esse cognoscens dixit: et seruabo eam. intellegens uero perfectam diligentiam in toto esse cordis officio consummauit omnem sermonis sui ordinem dicens: da mihi intellectum et scrutabo legem tuam et seruabo eam in toto corde meo.
We remember it written in the Proverbs of Solomon: "Wisdom will be reckoned to one without understanding who asks for wisdom." In this sense it seems to show that one who does not understand, and asks wisely, is believed to be wise. This, then, leads to this point: the prophet, who remained in the law, who according to the apostle was circumcised on the eighth day, by race of the tribe of Judah, by the grace of bodily anointing both chosen king and anointed, and by the mystery of birth worthy to have Jesus Christ as his son, prays as if a stranger to the law: "Give me understanding, and I will search your law and keep it with my whole heart." So he does not yet keep it, has not yet searched it, does not yet understand. So he is not speaking of that law in which the prophet was born, trained, and worked. Knowing, then, that the first part of prudence is that one ask wisely about what he does not understand, so as to understand what he does not know, he asks to receive understanding; and knowing that once the spirit of understanding is gained there is need of zeal, he says: "And I will search your law." Recognizing that the fruit of labor lies in keeping what has been found, he said: "And I will keep it." And understanding that perfect diligence lies in the duty of the whole heart, he completed the whole order of his speech, saying: "Give me understanding, and I will search your law and keep it with my whole heart."
118.5.6CSEL 22:403–404
Sed quid tandem istud est, quod intellegere optat, quod se et seruaturum toto corde promittit? meminit namque non otiosos dies sex Moysi libro in mundi huius operatione monstrari. scit non superfluam esse diei septimi requiem. recordatur in mensis religione festiuitatis caelestis tamquam in speculo figurari. nouit annum illum, quo post sex annorum seruitutem liber est, quo post operationem terra requiescit fructibus eius relictis pauperi et bestiis terrae, quo et debita uniuersa Hebraeis omnibus remittuntur. quinquagesimi quoque anni leges concupiscit scrutari; uult, sit in primo mense decimi diei usque in quartam decimam et deinde usque in uicesimam primam religio. illam quoque septimi mensis cogitat sollemnitatem, cuius memoriale in tubis est, decimi quoque diei in eo placationem et post quintam decimam in tabernaculis dierum octo laetitiam, quomodo ex his et sancta prima et octaua sit sancta. scit circumcisionem primam fuisse, scit et iteratam per Iesum esse gestam. azyma sancta desiderat, laetari pascha concupiscit, de qua in agni ipsius immolatione scriptum est: est pascha domini. terram repromissionis, terram lac et scit nondum uere a populo, qui secundo est circumcisus, obtentam. ob igitur intellectum orat; haec intellegens scrutaturum se pollicetur; haec seruaturum se professus est; haec seruans in toto corde
But what, after all, is this that he wishes to understand, which he also promises to keep with his whole heart? For he remembers that the six days in the work of this world are shown in the book of Moses not to be idle. He knows that the rest of the seventh day is not superfluous. He recalls that in the observance of the months a heavenly festival is figured as in a mirror. He knows that year in which one is free after six years of slavery, in which the land rests after its working, its fruits left to the poor and the beasts of the land, in which all debts are also remitted to all the Hebrews. He longs to search the laws of the fiftieth year too; he wants to know why the observance is from the tenth day of the first month to the fourteenth and then to the twenty-first. He thinks too of that solemnity of the seventh month, whose memorial is in trumpets, and of the atonement of the tenth day in it, and after the fifteenth day of the joy of eight days in tabernacles, how from these both the first day is holy and the eighth is holy. He knows that the first circumcision took place, he knows that it was repeated by Joshua. He desires the holy unleavened bread, he longs to rejoice in the Passover, of which it is written at the sacrifice of the lamb itself: "It is the Lord's Passover." He knows that the land of promise, the land of milk and honey, was not yet truly obtained by the people who were circumcised a second time. For this, then, he prays for understanding; understanding these things he promises to search them; these he has professed he will keep; keeping these with his whole heart …
118.5.7CSEL 22:404
Post quae sequitur; deduc me in semita mandatorum. tuorum; quia ipsam. et in hoc nunc uersu sermonis uirtus non proprie per condicionem translationis expressa est. nam id, quod nostri ita dixerunt: de semita, graecitas sic locuta est: ὁδήγησόν με ἐν τρίβῳ. et id, quod cum illis τρίβος dicitur, trita et frequentata semita intellegitur; nobiscum autem semita dici et esse semita et esse non trita. ergo quia utrumque eadem nuncupatione amplexa est, nos quoque ita sentiamus et semitam eandem sciamus esse, trita est.
After which follows: "Lead me in the path of your commandments, because I have wished for it." In this verse too the force of the word is not properly expressed, through the condition of translation. For where ours said "in the path," the Greek speaks thus: ὁδήγησόν με ἐν τρίβῳ. And what with them is called τρίβος is understood as a worn and much-travelled path; but with us a path can be called a path whether it is worn or not worn. So since the word has embraced both under the same name, let us also understand it so, and know that this same path is one that is worn.
118.5.8CSEL 22:404–405
Et obseruandum est, quod hic non legis, sed mandatorum semitam esse dicat. uia enim legis a Moyse gradientes, postquam ipsa constituta est, habuit. ceterum mandatorum idcirco semita est, quia in mandatis dei iam a saeculi percursum sit. in hac enim semita et Abel cucurrit et Seth institit et Enoch placuit et Noe reseruari meruit et Melchisedech et bene dicere potuit et decimas accepit et Abraham amicus dei est et Isaac heres est et Israhel est et ex Iuda expectatio gentium est et Ioseph in testimonio positus est et Iob a lege liber de hoste legis triumphat et Moyses uindicat et Iesus secundo Israhel circumcidit et Samuel dignus in unguendo rege deligitur.
And it must be observed that here he speaks of the path not of the law but of the commandments. For the way of the law had people walking in it from Moses, after it was established. But the path of the commandments is so called because it has been travelled in God's commandments from the beginning of the world. For on this path Abel ran, Seth stood firm, Enoch pleased God, Noah deserved to be preserved, Melchizedek was able both to bless and to receive tithes, Abraham is the friend of God, Isaac is heir, Israel is …, from Judah is the expectation of the nations, Joseph was set as a testimony, Job, free of the law, triumphs over the enemy of the law, Moses avenges, Joshua circumcises Israel a second time, and Samuel is chosen as worthy to anoint a king.
118.5.9CSEL 22:405
Et nunc in hac orat se hic et unctus et rex et propheta deduci. scit enim inbecillam sibi esse naturam, neque se posse hanc semitam sine duce adgredi. dux enim est omnibus hac semita pergentibus deus. dux enim est, cum dicitur: retro post dominum tuum ambulabis et ad eum, et rursum: retro post eum ambula, quoniam ipse te deducit. deducit autem, cum ait: qui non tulerit crucem suam et secutus me fuerit, non est me dignus. deducit etiam, cum prior omnem euangelicarum passionum semitam triuit. si istam apostoli docent, ille prior; constituit enim sapientia amicos dei et prophetas. si iuste hinc aliquid geritur a nobis, princeps iustitiae nostrae est; est enim ipse iustitia. si ob fidem ad terrorem flagellamur, flagellis ille dorsum suum praebuit. si alapis ad iniuriam, has ille suscepit. si in contumeliam, faciem suam ille non auertit a sputis.
And now he, anointed, king, and prophet, prays to be led on this path. For he knows that his nature is weak and that he cannot set out on this path without a guide. For God is the guide of all who travel this path. He is a guide when it is said: "You shall walk behind the Lord your God and cleave to him," and again: "Walk behind him, for he leads you." And he leads when he says: "Whoever does not take up his cross and follow me is not worthy of me." He leads too in that he first wore down the whole path of the gospel sufferings. If the apostles teach this path, he was first; for Wisdom makes friends of God and prophets. If we do anything justly in this, he is the prince of our righteousness; for he himself is righteousness. If we are scourged to terrify us for the faith, he gave his back to the scourges. If we are slapped to insult us, he received these. If we are put to scorn, he did not turn his face from spitting.
118.5.10CSEL 22:405–406
Dux in omnibus ille est: sed dux est diligentibus legem, quam superius se toto in corde custoditurum propheta professus est. non enim hic secundum sermonem. cum dicitur: quia ipsam uolui, ad semitam mandatorum referri potest; quia in graeco, ubi feminino genere semita scripta est, id, quod uelle se ait, masculino genere pronuntiat dicens: fie iv GOO,. lex enim feminino a nobis genere nuncupatur, graece dicta, ob quod ab his masculino enuntiatur. et cum illic feminino semita nuncupatur, id, quod uoluit, ad id refertur, quod per masculinum genus proprietate memoratum est.
He is the guide in all things; but he is guide to those who love the law, which the prophet professed above that he would keep with his whole heart. For here, according to the wording, what is said, "because I have wished for it," cannot be referred to the path of the commandments; because in the Greek, where "path" is written in the feminine gender, what he says he wished for he expresses in the masculine, saying: ὅτι αὐτὸν ἠθέλησα. For law is named by us in the feminine gender, but in Greek it is masculine, which is why it is expressed by them in the masculine. And while there "path" is named in the feminine, what he wished for is referred to what is mentioned properly in the masculine gender.
118.5.11CSEL 22:406
Sed sequitur nunc: inclina cor meum in testimonia tua et non in utilitatem. omnia propheta ad munus dei rettulit, siue ut lex uiae iustificationis statuatur a domino, siue ut sibi intellegentia praestetur, siue ut deducatur in semita, siue ut cor eius in testimonia inclinetur, id est in ea. quae sub testibus scripta sunt. teste enim caelo et terra lex tradita est.
But now follows: "Incline my heart to your testimonies and not to profit." The prophet referred everything to God's gift: whether that the law of the way of justification be set by the Lord, or that understanding be granted him, or that he be led on the path, or that his heart be inclined to the testimonies, that is, to the things written before witnesses. For the law was handed down with heaven and earth as witnesses.
118.5.12CSEL 22:406–407
Sed forte per hanc prophetae religiosam modestiam quisquam impie loqui ita audebit: si, inquit, omnia a deo sunt, humana ergo ignoratio caret culpa, cum nihil obtinere possit, nisi quod donatum a deo sumpserit. et primum hoc impietatis est uoluntas, existimare idcirco se ea, sunt credentium propria, non consequi, quod sibi a deo indulta non fuerint. sed omnem occasionem huius impiae excusationis propheta submouit. primum enim, cum orat, conueniens infirmitati suae egit officium; dehinc dei muneribus humanae deuotionis studia conexuit. cum enim ait: legem statue mihi, domine, uiam iustificationum tuarum, quid orationis humilitatem dei esset, ostendit. cum autem subiecit: et eam semper, officium deuotionis protulit. et in ceteris quoque quodam conplexu sibi inuicem conligauit: cum deduci se in semita postulat et cum id ipsum uoluit. prius enim, quae a deo sunt, cum honore; et tunc, hominis sunt, cum humilitatis atque officii sui subiecit. orat igitur, ut deus tribuat. a nobis est ergo, cum oramus. exordium, ut munus ab eo sit; dehinc, quia de exordio nostro munus eius est, ex nostro rursum est, ut exquiratur et obtineatur et maneat.
But perhaps through this devout modesty of the prophet someone will dare to speak impiously thus: "If," he says, "all things are from God, then human ignorance is free of blame, since it can obtain nothing except what it has received as given by God." And first, it is an impious will to think that one does not attain what is proper to believers because it has not been granted by God. But the prophet removed every occasion for this impious excuse. For first, when he prays, he performed the duty suited to his weakness; then he joined the efforts of human devotion to God's gifts. For when he says, "Set for me a law, Lord, the way of your justifications," he showed what belongs to the humility of prayer to God. But when he added, "And I will seek it out always," he set forth the duty of devotion. And in the rest too he bound them to one another in a kind of embrace: when he asks to be led on the path, and when he has wished for that very thing. For first he put what is from God, with honor; and then what is man's, with the humility of his duty. He prays, then, that God may grant. So it is from us, when we pray, that the beginning comes, so that the gift may be from him; then, because his gift comes from our beginning, it is again from us that it is sought, obtained, and kept.
118.5.13CSEL 22:407–408
In eo autem, quod ita se habet: inclina cor meum in iustificationes tuas et non in utilitatem, quidam ita transtulerunt: in iustificationes tuas et non in auaritiam. id. quod in codicibus continetur, ambigua in definitione utrique oportunum est. sed nos. sicuti oportet, sequimur septuaginta interpretum religiosam et antiquam auctoritatem. ex iudicio tamen ceterorum translatorum proprietatem cuiusque desiderio coaptantes. cum enim hi dixerint: in utilitatem, illi dixerint: in auaritiam, per idipsum, quomodo utilitas hic nunc sit subiecta, noscetur. nam saeculi homines pecuniam, argentum. aurum et cetera opum instrumenta utilitatem uocant. ergo cum in dei testimonia inclinari cor suum et non in utilitatem propheta orat, inclinatum in dei testimonia cor ab his sine dubio refert, quae humano iudicio existimantur utilia. et quidem intellegentiae nostrae sensum uersus, qui consequitur. confirmat.
Where it reads, "Incline my heart to your justifications and not to profit," some translated: "to your justifications and not to greed." What is contained in the manuscripts suits both, being ambiguous in its meaning. But we, as we ought, follow the devout and ancient authority of the seventy translators, while fitting the proper sense of each to our purpose by the judgment of the other translators. For since these said "to profit" and those said "to greed," from this very fact we shall learn how "profit" is meant here. For men of the world call money, silver, gold, and the other instruments of wealth "profit." So when the prophet prays that his heart be inclined to God's testimonies and not to profit, he undoubtedly turns his heart, inclined to God's testimonies, away from those things that are thought useful by human judgment. And the verse that follows confirms the sense of our understanding.
118.5.14CSEL 22:408
Ait enim: auerte oculos meos, ne uideant uanitatem, in uia tua uiuifica me, uanitatem eorum docens, quae ab hominibus existimantur utilia. et quaerendum est. quos oculos et a qua uanitate oret auerti. orat autem et animi et corporis oculos, eos scilicet, qui theatralibus ludis captiui incubant, eos, qui circensium certaminibus seruiunt, eos, qui uestium pretia mirantur, eos, quos auri splendor et gemmarum occupauit. nisi forte non magis equorum cursu astrorum cursus est gratior, et obscenis illis spectaculorum turpium fabulis non amoenius diuina illa humanae spei eloquia cantarent; nisi forte huic terrenorum metallorum usu non magis aeternitatis repositae diuitiae, honor et gloria, et blandior mihi erit auri species quam hominis et terrae et lucis et caeli. ab eorum igitur uanitatibus auerti oculos et hos corporis sui et illos animae deprecatur; de quibus beatus apostolus docet, cum ait: in uanitate sensus eorum intenebrati. alienati a dei.
For he says: "Turn away my eyes, lest they see vanity; give me life in your way," teaching the vanity of things which are thought useful by men. And we must ask which eyes he prays to have turned away, and from what vanity. He prays for the eyes both of the mind and of the body: those, namely, which lie captive at theatrical shows, those which are slaves to the contests of the circus, those which admire costly clothing, those which the splendor of gold and gems has seized. As if the course of the stars were not more pleasing than the course of horses, and as if those divine words of human hope did not sing more delightfully than the obscene tales of shameful spectacles! As if the riches of eternity laid up, honor and glory, were not better than this use of earthly metals, and as if the sight of gold would be more charming to me than that of man and earth and light and heaven! From the vanities of these, then, he prays that his eyes be turned away, both these of his body and those of his soul; of which the blessed apostle teaches when he says: "Their understanding darkened in vanity, alienated from the life of God."
118.5.15CSEL 22:408–409
Et auersorum oculorum a uanitate quod sit, non longe requirendum est. sequitur enim: et in uia tua uiuam. declinandi enim a uanitate sunt oculi, ut nobis in dei uita sit: non ea uita, nunc est, sed ea, quae in caelis reposita est et in Christo absconsa est. ita enim in omni hoc loco propheta est, tamquam uicturus sit et non modo. erigendi igitur oculi sunt, quibus Christi potius gloria, quam mundi huius inania et uana cernantur. in uia enim dei referentes oculos a uanitate uiuemus.
And what it means for the eyes to be turned away from vanity need not be sought far. For there follows: "And in your way I shall live." The eyes must be turned aside from vanity so that we may have life in God: not the life that is now, but the life laid up in heaven and hidden in Christ. For throughout this passage the prophet speaks as one who is to live, and not merely now. So the eyes must be lifted up, by which the glory of Christ may be seen rather than the empty and vain things of this world. For turning our eyes back from vanity, we shall live in the way of God.
118.5.16CSEL 22:409–410
Dehinc sequitur: statue seruo tuo eloquium tuum in timore tuo. nouit a plurimis propheta eloquia dei sine metu suscipi. plures enim auditas caelestis eloquii scripturas tamquam fabulam rerum inanium neglegunt et dei uerba, praeterire caelo et terra praetereunte non possunt, magno cum periculo temeritatis inridunt. nouit initium esse dei timorem. nouit in illa septiformis spiritus gratia timorem in postremo tamquam firmamentum eorum, quae superius sunt dicta, nominari. constitui ergo in se dei eloquia in timore dei deprecatur; quia scit nobis ea eloquia futura esse, tamquam dei timebuntur, utilia. dehinc adiecit: circumcide obprobrium meum, quod suspicatus sum: nam tua iucunda. propheta in corpore positus loquitur et neminem uiuentium scit sine peccato esse posse. unum meminit esse, qui peccatum non fecit, neque est dolus in ore eius. ergo cum circumcidi a se obprobrium deprecatur, peccatum circumcidi orat. quia peccatum sequatur obprobrium. sed cum circumcidi a se orat, non tamquam de admisso perpetratoque confessus est, sed quia id per infirmitates carnis suae in se suspicatur habitare. non enim ait: circumcide obprobrium. quod in me est; sed ait: circumcide obprobrium meum, quod sum, suspicionem obprobrii ex conscientia propriae infirmitatis ostendens. in iudiciis enim multi ad obprobrium resurgent quia his iucunda sint, in quibus peccati non manebit obprobrium, ipsam illam, quae in se est, suspicionem a se circumcidi orat obprobrii, ut sibi dei sint iucunda iudicia.
Then follows: "Establish your word for your servant in your fear." The prophet knows that the words of God are received by many without fear. For many neglect the Scriptures of the heavenly word when they hear them, as a tale of empty things, and with great danger of rashness they mock the words of God, which cannot pass away even when heaven and earth pass away. He knows that the fear of God is the beginning. He knows that in that grace of the sevenfold Spirit fear is named last, as the foundation of what is said before it. So he prays that God's words be established in him in the fear of God, because he knows that those words will be useful to us if they are feared as God's. Then he added: "Cut away my reproach, which I suspected; for your judgments are pleasant." The prophet speaks as one placed in a body, and he knows that none of the living can be without sin. He remembers that there is one who did no sin, nor was deceit found in his mouth. So when he prays that reproach be cut away from him, he prays that sin be cut away, because reproach follows sin. But when he prays for it to be cut away from him, he does not confess it as something committed and done, but because he suspects that it dwells in him through the weaknesses of his flesh. For he does not say, "Cut away the reproach which is in me," but he says, "Cut away my reproach, which I suspected," showing a suspicion of reproach out of awareness of his own weakness. For in the judgments many will rise to reproach; and because the judgments are pleasant to those in whom no reproach of sin will remain, he prays that the very suspicion of reproach which is in him be cut away, so that God's judgments may be pleasant to him.
118.5.17CSEL 22:410–411
Ac ne de admissi peccati conscientia precatus esse existimaretur, orationem omnem, quam sub singulis octonis uersibus defert, hac libertate conclusit: ecce tua: in tua uiuifica me. orauit, ut in dei timore dei in se statuerentur eloquia; dehinc, ut a se suspicio circumcideretur obprobrii: nunc concupiscentiam ac desiderium suum erga dei praecepta demonstrat et, ut in dei uiuificetur, orat; sciens proprium diuinae aequitatis esse munus, ut uiuificet eum, qui et praecepta dei desiderauerit, cui et circumcisa obprobrii suspicione iucunda iudicia sint et in dei timore dei constituantur eloquia. amen.
And lest he be thought to have prayed out of awareness of a sin committed, he concluded the whole prayer which he offers under each group of eight verses with this freedom: "Behold, I have longed for your commandments; in your righteousness give me life." He prayed that God's words be established in him in the fear of God; then that the suspicion of reproach be cut away from him; now he shows his longing and desire for God's precepts, and prays to be given life in God's righteousness, knowing that it is the proper gift of divine equity to give life to one who has desired God's precepts, to whom, with the suspicion of reproach cut away, the judgments are pleasant, and in whom God's words are established in the fear of God. Amen.
Tractates 118, chapter 6
118.6.1CSEL 22:411
Plures secundum apostolum sunt. qui sapientiam sequentes sapientiam dei reprobauerunt, ob quod stultam fecit deus saeculi sapientiam. quid enim infidelibus stultius est, qui praeter illum communem inreligiosorum errorem etiam hoc adiciunt piaculi, ut diuina scripturarum eloquia putent perfectae doctrinae carere ratione? et quia pro impietate sui diuinorum dictorum capaces esse non possunt, ad contumeliam caelestium pro excusatione hebetudinis prorumpunt dicentes, nihil in his rationabile, nihil esse perfectum, ea, a se dicantur, sola esse erudita et doctrinis expolita: stulti deo negantes, adsumere ipsi sibi audent. nec mirum est, si inreligiose de his opinantur, quorum hebetudinis modo intellegentiam non conse-.. uerum quamuis in eo sermone, quem superius habuimus. his. qui sapientiam dei sequuntur, cognitam dictorum perfectionem existimem, nihilque ideo esse, quod non consummatum atque omni ex parte perfectum sit, tamen id quoque etiam in his sextae litterae uersibus absolutius licebit intellegi.
There are many, as the apostle says, who, following wisdom, have rejected the wisdom of God; for this reason God has made the wisdom of the world foolish. For what is more foolish than the unbelievers, who, besides that common error of the irreligious, add this crime too, that they think the divine words of the Scriptures lack the reason of perfect teaching? And because in their impiety they cannot grasp the divine sayings, to excuse their dullness they break out into insult of heavenly things, saying that there is nothing reasonable in them, nothing perfect, and that only what is said by themselves is learned and polished by teaching: fools who deny wisdom to God and dare to claim it for themselves. Nor is it surprising if they think irreligiously of things whose understanding they do not attain because of their dullness. But although in the discourse we had above I think the perfection of the sayings has been made known to those who follow the wisdom of God, and that there is nothing in it that is not complete and perfect in every part, yet this too may be understood still more fully in these verses of the sixth letter.
118.6.2CSEL 22:411–412
Post superiorem enim sensum ita loquitur: et ueniat super me misericordia tua, domine. salutare tuum secundum uerbum tuum. misericordiam itaque primum deprecatus est, dehinc salutare. salus enim nostra ex misericordia dei est, et bonitatis suae hoc munus in nobis est: et inde oratio, unde et inchoat deprecantis. dehinc, ne ex incerta et inopinata spe precari propheta existimaretur, primum misericordiam, salutare commemorat, tum tertio subiecit: secundum uerbum tuum, ut hanc orandi fiduciam proficisci secundum uerbum dei, id est ex doctrina legis ostenderet.
For after the preceding thought he speaks thus: "And let your mercy come upon me, Lord, your salvation according to your word." So he first prayed for mercy, then for salvation. For our salvation is from God's mercy, and this gift of his goodness is in us; and so the prayer begins from where the one who prays begins. Then, lest the prophet be thought to pray out of an uncertain and unforeseen hope, he mentions first mercy, then salvation, and third he added "according to your word," to show that this confidence in praying proceeds according to God's word, that is, from the teaching of the law.
118.6.3CSEL 22:412
Post hunc itaque perfectae orationis ordinem id sequitur: et respondebo exprobrantibus mihi uerbum, quia speraui in uerbis tuis. tenet ordinem ratio perfecta: si. inquit, in me ueniat misericordia tua et salutare tuum secundum uerbum tuum et a te fuero misericordiam consecutus et a te, ut spopondisti, consequens erit, ut his, qui insipientiam mihi et errorem spei et uerbum hoc, quod in te spero. exprobrant, respondeam. quid itaque aduersus hanc prophetae responsionem exprobrare inreligiosa mens poterit?. misericordia primum oratur a deo, salus etiam expectatur a deo; deinde eam spopondisse per uerbum suum deus ostenditur. concluditur itaque exprobrantium impietas ab his, qui in dei uerbis sperant: cum quando deus praedicatur, et misericordiam et salutem ab eo credentium fides sperat, et doctrina spei nostrae sit, ut oratus et misereatur et saluet.
After this order of perfect prayer there follows: "And I will answer a word to those who reproach me, because I have hoped in your words." Perfect reason keeps its order: "If," he says, "your mercy comes upon me and your salvation according to your word, and I obtain mercy from you and salvation from you, as you promised, it will follow that I answer those who reproach me with folly and mistaken hope and with this word which I hope for in you." What, then, can an irreligious mind reproach against this answer of the prophet? Mercy is first prayed for from God, salvation too is expected from God; then God is shown to have promised it through his word. So the impiety of those who reproach is shut up by those who hope in God's words: since, whenever God is proclaimed, the faith of believers hopes both for mercy and for salvation from him, and the teaching of our hope is that, when prayed to, he both has mercy and saves.
118.6.4CSEL 22:412–413
Dehinc sequitur: et ne auferas de ueritatis usquequaque nimis; quia in iudiciis tuis speraui. accipiat humana insolentia humilitatis modestiaeque doctrinam. prius propheta concedi sibi orat, quam se id mereri. ut obtineat. ostendit. omnia uult a bonitate dei in se inchoari; nec tamen causam subtrahit, ait enim: et ne ore meo uerbum ueritatis usquequaque nimis. in quo primum maiestatem eius confitetur, qui semper orandus est; dehinc se non ex inani sperare subiecit dicens: quia in iudiciis tuis speraui. humanae autem temeritatis est hic mos se prius ad obtinendum aliquid, meritum quam mereatur, ingerere et eum, a quo quid postulet, tamquam ex officii debito conuenire.
Then follows: "And do not take the word of truth utterly out of my mouth, because I have hoped in your judgments." Let human insolence receive the teaching of humility and modesty. The prophet prays for it to be granted him before showing that he deserves to obtain it. He wants everything in him to be begun by God's goodness; and yet he does not withhold the reason. For he says: "And do not take the word of truth utterly out of my mouth." In this he first confesses the majesty of him who must always be prayed to; then he added that he does not hope from nothing, saying: "because I have hoped in your judgments." But it is the custom of human rashness to thrust forward its merit for obtaining something before it deserves it, and to approach him from whom it asks something as if from an obligation of duty.
118.6.5CSEL 22:413–414
Sed non nobis, ut modestiae tantum tenuerit propheta rationem; collocationes etiam uerborum uirtutesque sunt, cur ita dixerit: et ne auferas de ore uerbum ueritatis usquequaque nimis. omne oris officium cordis sensui motibusque famulatur. et cur propheta, ne ab ore sibi uerbum ueritatis auferatur, orat, uersus istius consequentia docent. non enim metum hunc prophetae fuisse est, ut sibi ueritatis uerbum ex corde uereretur auferri; ait enim: quia in iudiciis tuis speraui, sperans ergo in iudiciis dei uerbum ueritatis de sibi non metuit auferri scit autem quaedam esse peccata, ex ore uerbum auferant ueritatis. peccatori enim dixit deus: quare tu n a iustificationes meas? non enim ait: quare inmemor es mearum? sed monuit eum, qui in peccato mansisset, praedicationis officio abstinere. enim liberum a crimine esse praedicatorem, uult eloquia sua casti corporis casto ore tractari. cauendum igitur est, ne quando ex ore nostro uerbi ueritatis auferatur eloquium. hinc illud est quod apostolus monet: noli neglegere, quod in te charisma, ne per neglegentiam ac desidiam indigni uerbi dei simus.
But it is not enough for us that the prophet kept only the measure of modesty; there are also arrangements and forces of the words that explain why he said: "And do not take the word of truth utterly out of my mouth." Every duty of the mouth serves the thought and movements of the heart. And why the prophet prays that the word of truth not be taken from his mouth, the sequence of this verse teaches. For this was not the prophet's fear, that he feared the word of truth would be taken from his heart; for he says, "because I have hoped in your judgments." Hoping, then, in God's judgments, he does not fear that the word of truth will be taken from his heart; but he knows that there are certain sins which take the word of truth from the mouth. For God said to the sinner: "Why do you declare my justifications?" For he does not say, "Why are you unmindful of mine?" but he warned one who had remained in sin to abstain from the duty of preaching. For he wants the preacher to be free from crime; he wants his words handled by the chaste mouth of a chaste body. So we must take care that the speaking of the word of truth is never taken from our mouth. Hence comes what the apostle warns: "Do not neglect the gift that is in you," lest through negligence and sloth we become unworthy of the word of God.
118.6.6CSEL 22:414
Sed propheta non audet in tantum se a peccato liberum effici uelle, ut non meminerit unum solum esse, qui peccatum non fecerit et dolus in ore eius non inuentus sit, et idcirco subiecit: usquequaque nimis. per modestiam scilicet confessionis et, ut non auferatur a se uerbum ueritatis, orat, et per honorem eius, qui unus tantum sine peccato est, ne usquequaque nimis a se auferatur, expostulat, quia se hominem meminerit, qui per naturae infirmitatem sine peccato esse non possit.
But the prophet does not dare to wish to be made so free from sin that he forgets that there is only one who did no sin and in whose mouth no deceit was found; and therefore he added: "utterly." Through the modesty of confession he prays that the word of truth not be taken from him, and out of honor for him who alone is without sin he asks that it not be utterly taken from him, because he remembers that he is a man who through the weakness of nature cannot be without sin.
118.6.7CSEL 22:414–415
Et custodiam legem tuam semper in saeculum et in saeculum. nullum propheta uitae finem pertimescit. non enim concluditur fides sua, sed se in infinitatem temporum officio custodiendae legis extendit. scit et altare a Moyse in exemplum esse superioris altaris. scit et Aaron sacerdotem ad speciem esse ostensi in monte sacerdotis ornatum. Moysi enim deus dixit: uade, fac omnia secundum exemplum, quod tibi in monte. festinat ergo in leges illas aeternorum saeculorum. nam cum lex futuri umbra sit, necesse est corpus illud uerae legis aeternum sit. distinxit autem praesens officium ab indefessa illa perpetui officii iugitate dicens: et custodiam legem tuam semper in saeculum et in saeculum saeculi. cum ait: semper in saeculum, nullum in hac temporis uita obliuionis tempus admisit. cum autem adiecit: et in, scit per hanc umbram legis ad et legis ascendi. ait enim saeculum tamquam temporis tempus, quod quadam uicissitudine huius saeculi saeculum sit futurum.
"And I will keep your law always, for ever and ever." The prophet fears no end of life. For his faith is not shut in, but extends itself into infinite ages in the duty of keeping the law. He knows that the altar made by Moses was a copy of the altar above. He knows that the priest Aaron was clothed after the likeness of the priestly dress shown on the mountain. For God said to Moses: "Go, make all things according to the pattern which was shown you on the mountain." So he hastens to those laws of the eternal ages. For since the law is a shadow of what is to come, the body of the true law must be eternal. He distinguished the present duty from that unwearying continuance of perpetual duty, saying: "And I will keep your law always, for ever and for ever and ever." When he says "always, for ever," he allowed no time of forgetfulness in this life of time. But when he added "and for ever and ever," he knows that through this shadow of the law one ascends to the eternal age of the law. For he speaks of "the age of the age" as a time of time, because by a kind of succession there will be an age to follow this age.
118.6.8CSEL 22:415
Nouit esse secundum euangelicum diuitem et pauperem Lazarum exemptae a corpore legem, per quam alia ab alia chao inpenetrabili separetur. secundum apostolum Paulum et resurrectionis esse quoque legem, in qua differt stella ab stella in claritate. scit esse leges angelorum, alii, adsistentes Cherubim, deum indefessa. conlaudant, alii ante conspectum inuisibilis nobis dei tamquam lege officii proprioris adsistunt. nouit et pusillorum angelos deum cotidie ex quadam lege conspicere. scit utique esse aeternas leges et omnes eas se in illo saeculi custoditurum esse confidit, quia ea, per umbram sunt constituta, in hoc nunc saeculo semper obseruet.
He knows that, as with the rich man of the gospel and the poor man Lazarus, there is a law for souls freed from the body, by which one is separated from another by an impassable chasm. He knows, as the apostle Paul says, that there is also a law of the resurrection, in which star differs from star in glory. He knows that there are laws of the angels: some, standing by as Cherubim, praise God unweariedly; others stand before the face of God, invisible to us, as by the law of a more proper office. He knows too that the angels of the little ones see God daily by a certain law. He knows that there are certainly eternal laws, and he trusts that he will keep all of them in that age, because he always observes now in this age the things that were established as their shadow.
118.6.9CSEL 22:415–416
Et ingrediebar in dilatatione: quia mandata tua exquisiui. non est angustus propheta; et superius iam dixerat: in uia praeceptorum tuorum cucurri, cum dilatasti. scit inter humanarum tribulationum passionem semper ad deum patulo esse se corde oportere. quod ipsum apostolus docet dicens: i u s, sed non. nouit hanc ipsam amplitudinem cordis de se idem apostolus gloriari. ad Corinthios ait: non angustamini in, sed angustamini in uobis. patet etiam hic quoque propheta dicenti deo: et habitabo in his et ambulabo in ipsis. angusta igitur sunt peccantium corda, et hospitio deum mens polluta non recipit. patulum enim domicilium inconceptibili deo opus est, et idcirco in amplitudine propheta ambulat, quia in eo dei in se loquentis habitatio est. causam uero amplitudinis suae docet dicens: quia mandata tua perquisiui. naturae nostrae consuetudinem recordemur, quotiensque lectioni uacantes mandata dei et praecepta scrutamur, in quantam amplitudinem mentium nostrarum dilatantur angustiae, et quam patulus nostrae humilitatis in desideria diuina fit sensus. per peccatorum autem nostrorum conscientiam coartatur nobis omnis animi amplitudo, ac difficilia omnia et angusta sunt, cum diuini uerbi habitatione sumus indigni.
"And I walked in largeness, because I sought out your commandments." The prophet is not narrow; and above he had already said: "I ran in the way of your commandments, when you enlarged my heart." He knows that amid the suffering of human tribulations one must always have an open heart toward God. The apostle teaches this very thing, saying: "We are afflicted, but not straitened." The same apostle knows how to glory in this very largeness of heart about himself. To the Corinthians he says: "You are not straitened in us, but you are straitened in yourselves." Here too the prophet lies open to God, who says: "And I will dwell in them and walk among them." So the hearts of sinners are narrow, and a polluted mind does not receive God as a guest. For an open dwelling is needed for God, who cannot be contained, and therefore the prophet walks in largeness, because in him is the dwelling of God who speaks in him. He teaches the reason for his largeness, saying: "because I sought out your commandments." Let us recall the habit of our nature: whenever, with time for reading, we search God's commandments and precepts, into how great a largeness the narrowness of our minds is widened, and how open the sense of our lowliness becomes to divine desires. But through awareness of our sins every largeness of mind is narrowed for us, and all things are hard and narrow when we are unworthy of the indwelling of the divine word.
118.6.10CSEL 22:416–417
Sed ambulans in latitudine propheta uersari in officio digno adeptae amplitudinis debet: et uersatur plane. sequitur enim: et loquebar in testimoniis tuis in conspectu regum et non confundebar. hoc officium dilatati cordis est, ut ex eo in abundantia doctrinae uerba procedant loquitur enim propheta constanter aduersus principes terrae deum praedicans. et quidem duplex significatio sensus huius est, quia secundum dominica praecepta oporteat a nobis coram regibus et potestatibus praedicari, neque nos terrenarum potestatum fas est iure terreri, quominus omni confusione reiecta constanti et publica fide deum, qui negantes negaturus sit, non negemus. potest et sermo ad eos referri, de quibus apostolus ait: iam sine nobis regnatis, et utinam regnetis: id est, tamquam in conspectu sanctorum, qui utique frequenter reges terrae sunt nuncupati, propheta dei testimonia sit locutus neque confusus sit per praedicationem suam caelestis instituta praebere. gemina autem intellegentia electionem ex se praestat, ut, quia utrumque ex testimoniis scripturarum intellegi promptum est, aut utrumque significatum existimetur, aut quod magis uidebitur probabile eligatur.
But the prophet, walking in breadth, must be occupied in a duty worthy of the largeness he has gained; and he plainly is. For there follows: "And I spoke of your testimonies in the sight of kings, and I was not put to shame." This is the duty of an enlarged heart, that from it words of teaching should come forth in abundance; for the prophet speaks steadfastly against the princes of the earth, proclaiming God. And this sense has a double meaning: first, that according to the Lord's precepts we must preach before kings and authorities, and that it is not right for us to be terrified by the power of earthly authorities so as not to confess, with all shame cast aside and with steadfast and public faith, the God who will deny those who deny him. The word may also be referred to those of whom the apostle says: "Already you reign without us, and would that you did reign": that is, the prophet spoke God's testimonies as in the sight of the saints, who are certainly often called kings of the earth, and was not ashamed to present the ordinances of heaven by his preaching. This twofold understanding offers a choice: since both can readily be understood from the testimonies of the Scriptures, either both may be thought to be meant, or whichever seems more probable may be chosen.
118.6.11CSEL 22:417
Et meditabar in mandatis tuis, dilexi uehementer. non solum igitur loqui nos in testimoniis dei conuenit, sed legis mandata omnia diurna meditatione retinere. neque tantum meditatio utilis est, nisi lex ipsa, quae in meditatione est, diligatur, neque diligere communi dilectione sufficiet, nisi etiam uehementer id, quod diligitur, diligatur. atque ideo hunc omnem perfectae rationis ordinem sermo propheticus percurrit dicens: et in mandatis tuis, quae dilexi uehementer.
"And I meditated on your commandments, which I loved exceedingly." So it is fitting for us not only to speak of God's testimonies but to retain all the commandments of the law by daily meditation. Nor is meditation alone useful unless the law itself, which is meditated on, is loved; nor will it suffice to love with an ordinary love, unless what is loved is also loved exceedingly. And therefore the prophetic word runs through this whole order of perfect reason, saying: "and on your commandments, which I loved exceedingly."
118.6.12CSEL 22:417–418
Sed neque meditatio legis neque ipsa dilectio inpensa sufficiet, nisi fructum operum et uoluntatis efficientia consequatur. neque in hoc propheta cessauit; ait enim: et tuli manus meas ad mandata tua, dilexi ualde. manus ad mandata, quae diligebat, erexit; non utique contumeliosas aut procaces, sed mandatis humilitatis seruientes, sed operibus insistentes, sed fidei praecepta. peragentes. operis uero officium semper esse oportet intentum et nulla interdum neglegentis otii dissimulatione cessare. in hoc quoque se manere propheta testatur dicens: et exercebar in iustificationibus tuis. et exercitatio adsiduitatem operationis ostendit. frequenter itaque sibi esse ac semper intentam praeceptorum obseruantiam docet ad illas, de quibus superius memorauimus, caelestium iustificationum, nunc se in iustificationibus praesentis et ex futuris adumbratae legis exercens.
But neither meditation on the law nor love itself, however intense, will suffice unless the fruit of works and the carrying out of the will follow. Nor did the prophet stop short in this; for he says: "And I lifted up my hands to your commandments, which I loved greatly." He raised his hands to the commandments which he loved: certainly not insolent or wanton hands, but hands serving the commandments of humility, intent on works, carrying out the precepts of faith. The duty of work must always be intent and never cease through the pretense of careless idleness. The prophet testifies that he remains in this too, saying: "And I was exercised in your justifications." Exercise shows persistence in working. So he teaches that his observance of the precepts is frequent and always intent, toward those heavenly justifications we mentioned above, exercising himself now in the justifications of the present law, which is a shadow of things to come.
Tractates 118, chapter 7
118.7.1CSEL 22:418–419
Omnis dei sermo, qui scripturis diuinis continetur, in spem bonorum caelestium uocat. atque ob id propheta in omnibus se dei praeceptis mansisse confidens constanter ait: memorare uerbum tuum seruo tuo. numquid promissi sui deus inmemor est? absit istud, ut aliqua subrepere in aeternam atque indefessam uirtutem humanarum infirmitatum genera credantur. sed propheta, qui promissis dei credidit, qui desiderio caelestium detentus est, qui contemptu praesentium futura sperauit, non ad memoriam uerbi sui deum admonet; sed, ut uerbi sui in se seruo suo memor sit, deprecatur, id est, ut ita dignus habeatur, in quo iam deus uerbi sui memor esse dignetur, quo in uerbo spem dederit. et spem non inanem esse oportet neque uerbis tantummodo praedicari, sed rebus ipsis doceri, ut, si quando incidant infirmitates, persecutiones, damna, orbitates, contumeliae, has praesentis minas ac potestates spe aeternorum promissorum consolemur.
Every word of God contained in the divine Scriptures calls us into the hope of heavenly goods. And therefore the prophet, confident that he has remained in all of God's precepts, says steadfastly: "Remember your word to your servant." Is God forgetful of his promise? Far be it that any kind of human weakness should be believed to creep into eternal and unwearying power. But the prophet, who believed God's promises, who was held by desire for heavenly things, who hoped for the future with contempt for the present, does not remind God to remember his word; but he prays that God be mindful of his word in him, his servant, that is, that he may be held worthy that God should now deign to be mindful of his word in him, the word in which he gave hope. And hope must not be empty, nor only proclaimed in words, but taught by deeds themselves, so that if ever illnesses, persecutions, losses, bereavements, or insults befall us, we may console ourselves against these present threats and powers by the hope of the eternal promises.
118.7.2CSEL 22:419
Et ad quidem omnia nos docemur; sed iam ipsis propheta perfunctus est dicens: est in humilitate mea: quoniam eloquium tuum uiuificauit me. haec ad spem refertur, quam sperare eum deus fecit. consolata est eum uero in humilitate, id est. cum contemnitur, cum, cum iniuriis uexatur, cum contumeliis inhonestatur sciens hanc sibi temptationum praesentium esse militiam. sed se inter haec suae bella spes a domino consolatur: uiuificatur autem per eloquia dei. scit in his excellentem esse in humilitatis gloriam; scit animam eloquiis dei refectam tamquam pabulum aliquod in se aeternae continere. non mouetur in eloquiis dei uiuens inani superbientium gloria. nouit enim indigentiam suam eorum esse opulentia ditiorem. scit ieiunia sua caelesti atque euangelica benedictione saturari. scit humilitatem suam glorioso esse honoris praemio munerandam. atque ita subiecit: superbi inique agebant usquequaque: a lege autem tua non declinaui. inter nimias et consummatas superborum iniquitates — ualde enim inique agebant - nullo propheta deflexu a dei lege declinat.
And we are taught for all these things; but the prophet has already gone through them himself, saying: "This has consoled me in my lowliness, for your word has given me life." This refers to the hope which God made him hope for. It consoled him in lowliness, that is, when he is despised, when he is …, when he is harassed with injuries, when he is dishonored with insults, knowing that this is his warfare of present temptations. But amid these wars of his, the hope from the Lord consoles him; and he is given life through God's words. He knows that in these the glory of humility is excellent; he knows that the soul refreshed by God's words holds in itself, as it were, a food of eternity. Living in God's words, he is not moved by the empty glory of the proud. For he knows that his need is richer than their wealth. He knows that his fasts are filled with the heavenly and gospel blessing. He knows that his lowliness is to be rewarded with the glorious prize of honor. And so he added: "The proud acted unjustly to the utmost; but I did not turn aside from your law." Amid the excessive and complete iniquities of the proud, for they acted very unjustly, the prophet turns aside from God's law by no swerving.
118.7.3CSEL 22:419–420
Sed non declinantem a dei lege oportet esse memorem iudiciorum dei. in omni enim nostrae genere memoria nobis diuini iudicii inserenda et continenda est, ut, cum aliquid agimus, residente in nobis iudicii memoria uel numquam potius abeunte praeceptis dei opera nostra famulentur. beatus erit, quisquis non sine memoria diuini iudicii omnia gesserit. quod de se propheta profitetur dicens: memoratus sum iudiciorum tuorum a et exhortatus sum. haec nunc a saeculo tantum, non etiam a saeculo saeculi, quia omnia in nos iudicia dei ex saeculi huius ac mundi temporibus instituta sunt. in his autem se cohortatus est, inter hos scilicet mundi turbines et inter haec passionum corporalium praelia, ad tolerantiam ac infestantium malorum humilitatem suam iudiciorum dei memoria adhortatus.
But one who does not turn aside from God's law must be mindful of God's judgments. For in every kind of our action the memory of the divine judgment must be implanted and kept in us, so that, when we do anything, with the memory of the judgment residing in us, or rather never departing, our works may serve God's precepts. Blessed will be whoever has done all things not without the memory of the divine judgment. The prophet professes this of himself, saying: "I remembered your judgments from of old, Lord, and was encouraged." These now only "from of old," not also "from age to age," because all God's judgments upon us have been set from the times of this age and world. In these he encouraged himself, that is, amid these whirlwinds of the world and these battles of bodily sufferings, he exhorted his lowliness by the memory of God's judgments to endurance of the evils that assail him.
118.7.4CSEL 22:420–421
Deinde sequitur: defectio animae tenuit me a peccatoribus derelinquentibus legem tuam. uirtutes propriae prophetae huic ad spem uitae non sufficiunt, neque. quod spem in dei - uerbo habuit, neque quod in spe eadem se consolatus est, neque quod dei uiuificatur eloquio, neque quod non declinat a lege, neque quod se per memoriam iudiciorum adhortatur: quin etiam dolore humanae impietatis fatigatur et ob inreligiosas hominum impietates est sanctus enim quisque cum, non humilitatis suae, qui est, sed eius, qui, miseretur: ut a uesano filio pater, ut ab amente aegroto medicus contumeliam passus dolorem non ex eo, quod perpessus erit, sentit, sed ob id, quod ille, quem sanum esse cuperet, iniuriam sibi uesanus intulerit. membro autem uno aliquid patiente secundum apostolum conpatiuntur et cetera membra. defectio itaque secundum haec tenet prophetam super peccatores relinquentes dei legem: miserantis scilicet et dolentis et tamquam membris suis pro parte iniquorum et inreligiosorum fatigatur.
Then follows: "Faintness of soul has seized me because of sinners who forsake your law." The prophet's own virtues are not enough for him for the hope of life: neither that he had hope in God's word, nor that he consoled himself in that same hope, nor that he is given life by God's word, nor that he does not turn aside from the law, nor that he encourages himself by the memory of the judgments; but he is also wearied with grief at human impiety and is afflicted because of the irreligious impieties of men. For every holy man, when …, has pity not on his own lowliness, but on the one who …: as a father insulted by a mad son, or a physician by a delirious patient, feels grief not from what he has suffered, but because the one whom he wished to be well has, in his madness, done him injury. And when one member suffers anything, as the apostle says, the other members suffer with it. So faintness, in this sense, holds the prophet over sinners who abandon God's law: he is wearied as one who pities and grieves, as though in his own members, on behalf of the wicked and irreligious.
118.7.5CSEL 22:421
Manet autem ipse, quantum ad se, iustificationibus dei semper intentus; et omni in quacumque sede, in qua habitat, nequaquam ex ore eius confessionis hymnus abscedit. ait enim: cantabiles mihi erant iustificationes in loco incolatus mei. exemplo suo docet, suscepta semel in aures psalmorum cantica in corde esse retinenda et semper ea officio oris iteranda. non neglegenter, ut ipse praedicat, legit atque audiuit, neque inreligiositatis nostrae modo diuina eloquia aut occupatis in aliud aut incuriosis oculis legit, aut mox obliuiosis auribus excepit: sed cantabiles ei sunt, id est sine intermissione. in omni autem cuiusque generis loco nequaquam a se abesse psallendi consuetudinem docet, cum ait: in loco mei. non enim ait: in incolatu meo, sed ita ait: in loco incolatus mei, in quacumque scilicet sede mansisset: intellegens se mundi huius esse peregrinum, dei tamen sibi semper iustificationes esse cantabiles.
But he himself, as far as he is concerned, remains always intent on God's justifications; and in every place where he dwells, the hymn of confession never leaves his mouth. For he says: "Your justifications were songs to me in the place of my sojourning." By his example he teaches that the songs of the psalms, once received into the ears, are to be retained in the heart and always repeated by the mouth's service. He did not read and hear carelessly, as he himself declares, nor did he read the divine words, as our irreligion does, with eyes busy with something else or uncaring, or receive them with soon-forgetful ears; but they are songs to him, that is, without ceasing. And he teaches that the habit of singing psalms never left him in any place of any kind, when he says, "in the place of my sojourning." For he does not say "in my sojourning," but "in the place of my sojourning," that is, in whatever seat he stayed: understanding that he is a stranger in this world, yet that God's justifications are always songs to him.
118.7.6CSEL 22:421–422
Sed quam cantabiles sint iustificationes dei, ostendit, cum nullum omittat tempus, quo non in illo caelestium opere uersetur. ait enim: memor fui in nocte nominis tui, domine, et custodiui legem tuam. scit praecipue nocturno tempore diuini esse a nobis nominis recordandum. scit tum maxime custodiam dei legis a nobis esse retinendam, cum subrepunt animo cupiditates. cum uitiorum stimuli per recens adsumptum cibum corpus exagitant, tum dei nomen recordandum est, tum custodienda lex eius est pudicitiam, continentiam, timorem dei statuens. nouit hoc praecipue tempore deum orandum, deprecandum, dicens in loco alio: lauabo per singulas noctes lectum meum, lacrimis stratum meum rigabo. non est periculoso nocturnarum uigiliarum otio animus relaxandus. sed in orationibus, in deprecationibus, in confessionibus peccatorum occupandus est, ut, cum maxime corporis uitiis oportunitas datur, tum praecipue eadem uitia legis recordatione frangantur.
But he shows how much God's justifications are songs to him, since he leaves out no time in which he is not occupied in that heavenly work. For he says: "I remembered your name in the night, Lord, and kept your law." He knows that God's name must be remembered by us especially at night. He knows that the keeping of God's law must be held fast by us most of all when desires creep into the mind. When the goads of vices stir the body through food lately taken, then God's name must be remembered, then his law must be kept, establishing modesty, self-control, and the fear of God. He knows that God must be prayed to and entreated especially at this time, as he says in another place: "Every night I will wash my bed; I will water my couch with tears." The mind must not be relaxed in the dangerous idleness of the night watches, but occupied in prayers, entreaties, and confessions of sins, so that when most opportunity is given to the vices of the body, then above all those vices may be broken by remembering the law.
118.7.7CSEL 22:422–423
Sequitur deinde: mihi facta est: quia iustificationes tuas exquisiui. haec ad memoriam refertur, per quam memor fuit noctibus nominis dei. quod autem ait: mihi facta est, id est non subito recurrens neque temporaria adsumpta, sed semper inmanens et intra se quodam fidei opere instituta, et ob id ei facta, quia iustificationes exquisierit; utile est igitur iustificationes dei sine aliqua temporis intermissione scrutari, quia per exquisitionem earum memoriam dei nobis perpetim continemus in Christo Iesu, cui est gloria in saecula saeculorum. amen.
Then follows: "This has been made mine, because I sought out your justifications." This refers to the memory by which he remembered God's name in the nights. And when he says "has been made mine," it means not recurring suddenly or taken up for a time, but always abiding and established within him by a kind of work of faith; and it was made his because he sought out the justifications. So it is useful to search God's justifications without any break in time, because by seeking them out we keep the memory of God perpetually in Christ Jesus, to whom be glory for ever and ever. Amen.
Tractates 118, chapter 8
118.8.1CSEL 22:423
psalmorum codices legentes et nos ita opinabamur, uersum. qui octauae litterae primus est, id est hunc: portio mea dominus, in superioribus septimae litterae octo uersibus contineri, quia ita in latinis codicibus atque etiam in nonnullis graecis scriptum continebatur; et sane absolutior ita sensus uidebatur; sed secundum emendatum apud Graecos psalmorum librum legentes inuenimus hunc uersum non nouissimum esse sed primum. itaque secundum hanc cognitionem nos quoque tractare de eo adgressi sumus.
Reading the manuscripts of the Psalms, we too used to think that the verse which is the first of the eighth letter, namely, "The Lord is my portion," was contained among the preceding eight verses of the seventh letter, because it was so written in the Latin manuscripts and also in some Greek ones; and the sense certainly seemed more complete that way. But reading the corrected book of the Psalms among the Greeks, we found that this verse is not the last but the first. And so, following this knowledge, we too have undertaken to treat of it here.
118.8.2CSEL 22:423
enim ita: portio. dixi: custodiam legem tuam. rarus quisque est. cui ista fiducia est, ut portionem suam esse deum audeat dicere. renuntiandum est omnibusque rebus eius, ut nobis deus portio sit. si nos ambitio detineat, si cura pecuniae occupet, si libidinum capiant, si negotia rerum familiarium demorentur. portio nobis deus non erit curarum atque uitiorum possessione detentis.
For it reads thus: "The Lord is my portion; I said that I would keep your law." Rare is the one who has the confidence to dare to say that God is his portion. One must renounce all things and their world for God to be our portion. If ambition holds us back, if care for money occupies us, if the allurements of lusts take hold of us, if the business of household affairs detains us, God will not be our portion while we are held by the possession of cares and vices.
118.8.3CSEL 22:423–424
Moysi cum iussum esset portiones incolatus distribuere gentibus filiorum, ita ei de tribu Leuitica est: filiis Leui non erit portio neque sors in medio fratrum suorum. quia dominus deus est pars eorum. et rursum scriptum meminimus:. ego dominus pars eorum. nullam ergo deo seruientibus lex lata terrenam esse uoluit portionem, quia pars eorum deus esset.
When Moses was commanded to distribute portions for dwelling among the tribes of the sons of Israel, it was said to him thus about the tribe of Levi: "The sons of Levi shall have no portion nor lot among their brothers, because the Lord God is their part." And again we remember it written: "I the Lord am their part." So the law that was given wanted those who serve God to have no earthly portion, because God was their part.
118.8.4CSEL 22:424–425
Meminit et euangelii praedicator ille Petrus. nullam sibi esse portionem possessionis humanae. cum oranti alimoniam respondit: aurum et argentum non est mihi; quod autem habeo, hoc tibi do. quid est istud, Petre, quod possides? renuntiaueras omnibus domino tuo dicens: ecce nos omnia dereliquimus et secuti sumus te, quid erit nobis? et tibi ille responderat: amen dico uobis. quod uos, qui secuti me estis, in regeneratione sedebitis super duodecim thronos iudicantes duodecim tribus Israhel. et exemplo uestro ceteris relinquentibus cuncta spoponderat, quod et centuplum acciperent et dehinc uitam possessuri essent. quid est igitur istud, Petre, quod habes? habes plane, et non audeo dicere plus te centuplo obtinere; dico tamen te sine multiplicatione calculi possidere. dicis enim: quod habeo, hoc tibi do: in nomine Iesu Christi surge et ambula. o felix possessio, o perfecta dei portio! non terrena largiris, sed naturae opus rependis et uitiosi partus damna restauras.. claudum natum ingredi iubes et multae aetatis uirum incessu rudi incitas. has opes tribuit, cuius deus portio est. nouit et Paulus diuitiae suae glorias dicens: mihi autem absit gloriari nisi in cruce domini mei Iesu Christi, per quem mihi mundus crucifixus est. et ego mundo. talis apostolo gloria, talis est portio.
Peter too, that preacher of the gospel, remembered that he had no portion of human possession, when he answered the one who asked for alms: "Gold and silver I do not have; but what I have, this I give you." What is this, Peter, that you possess? You had renounced all things, saying to your Lord: "Behold, we have left all things and followed you; what will we have?" And he had answered you: "Truly I say to you, that you who have followed me will, in the regeneration, sit on twelve thrones judging the twelve tribes of Israel." And he had promised that others who left all things after your example would receive a hundredfold and would then possess life. What is it, then, Peter, that you have? You plainly have something, and I do not dare say that you hold more than a hundredfold; yet I say that you possess beyond any multiplying of reckoning. For you say: "What I have, this I give you: in the name of Jesus Christ, rise and walk." O happy possession, O perfect portion of God! You do not lavish earthly things, but you repay the work of nature and restore the losses of a defective birth. You bid one born lame to walk, and you rouse a man of many years to an unpractised gait. He bestows these riches whose portion is God. Paul too knew the glories of his riches, saying: "But far be it from me to glory except in the cross of my Lord Jesus Christ, through whom the world has been crucified to me, and I to the world." Such was the apostle's glory, such his portion.
118.8.5CSEL 22:425–426
Humanarum igitur hereditatum modo portionem, quae melior est et quae utilior, eligamus. si circa terrena patrimonia sua in coheredum diuisione quis nititur sortem commodioris portionis appetere, quanto propensiore cura partem caelestis hereditatis deligemus? centuplum dominus promittit: et non in aeternum, sed in praesens. aeternorum autem bonorum inmensa et infinita retributio est; ceterum sub definitione centupli praesentium mensura concluditur. ego autem ambigo, utrum hoc centuplum Petri excesserit portio. certe secundum domini praeceptum sperandum nunc in hoc saeculo relictis omnibus saeculi rebus, centuplum munus est. est enim nobis deus portio, qui ait: et inhabitabo in his. non ergo centupli praemium est, ut in hoc terreno corpusculo nostro deus habitet? sed quid dico habitet? ait et ipse: et ambulabo in his. patens deo est fidelis pectoris et ampla possessio. ut inhabitet, ut ambulet. sed qui inhabitat, qui inambulat, quid tertium addidit? et ego ero illorum deus. ecce promissam nobis ab eo portionem, ut simus deo habitatio, et, dum in nobis ambulat, sit nobis ipse possessio, si saeculum relinquamus, si possessionis terrenae labi renuntiemus, si hereditatem caducorum respuamus, si uiuentes de saeculo exeamus. quid enim mercis est, emortuis corporibus et exeunte anima dissolutis saeculum reliquisse? carendum est eo per contemptum eius. nesciendum est ignoratione uoluptatum suarum. moriendum nobis in eo est, dum non ei uiuimus. scit Paulus iam non se sibi uiuere dicens: quod enim uiuo, iam non ego uiuo, uiuit autem in me Christus.
So, in the manner of human inheritances, let us choose the portion which is better and more useful. If in the division of earthly patrimony among coheirs someone strives to get the lot of the more advantageous portion, with how much more eager care shall we choose a share of the heavenly inheritance? The Lord promises a hundredfold, and not for eternity, but in the present. The repayment of eternal goods is immeasurable and infinite; but the measure of present things is confined within the limit of a hundredfold. I am in doubt whether Peter's portion exceeded this hundredfold. Certainly, according to the Lord's precept, what is to be hoped for now in this age when all the things of the age are left behind is the gift of a hundredfold. For God is our portion, who says: "And I will dwell in them." Is it not then the reward of a hundredfold, that God dwells in this little earthly body of ours? But why do I say "dwells"? He himself also says: "And I will walk among them." The faithful heart is a possession open and spacious for God, so that he may dwell and walk in it. But he who dwells, he who walks within, what third thing did he add? "And I will be their God." Behold the portion he has promised us: that we be a dwelling for God, and that while he walks in us he himself be our possession, if we leave the world, if we renounce the stain of earthly possession, if we reject the inheritance of perishable things, if we go out of the world while living. For what merit is there in having left the world when the body is dead and the soul departs and is dissolved? We must do without it by contempt for it. We must not know it, through ignorance of its pleasures. We must die in it while we do not live for it. Paul knows that he no longer lives for himself, saying: "For what I live, it is no longer I who live, but Christ lives in me."
118.8.6CSEL 22:426
Propheta itaque secundum apostolum non saeculo uiuens constanter et libere. ait: portio mea dominus. tenuit hunc, quem in superioribus modum, cum se custoditurum legem dei spopondit. non enim de ea, quam corporaliter agebat, loqui intellegitur, cum quando custoditurum se potius, quam custodire fateatur.
So the prophet, living not for the world, according to the apostle, says steadfastly and freely: "The Lord is my portion." He kept the measure he kept above when he promised that he would keep God's law. For he is not understood to speak of the law which he carried out bodily, since he confesses rather that he will keep it than that he keeps it.
118.8.7CSEL 22:426–427
Sequitur deinde: deprecatus sum faciem tuam in toto corde meo: miserere mei secundum eloquium tuum. Moysen deprecatum esse meminimus, ut deum uideret et forte cognata preci eius prophetae huius oratio existimabitur. sed dictum meminit a deo: nemo hominum uidebit faciem meam et uiuet. ergo quod negatum Moysi meminerit, id concedi sibi postulat? sed rursum, licet dicto euangelico anterior sit, meminit tamen hanc fidei beatitudinem reseruari, quia dicitur: beati mundo corde, quoniam ipsi deum uidebunt. itaque cum in lege sciat dictum, quod nemo faciem dei uideat et uiuat, et ex euangelica beatitudine non ambigat omnes mundo corde deum esse uisuros, perfectae modestiae temperamento cupiditatem desiderii sui elocutus est dicens: deprecatus sum faciem tuam in toto corde meo. scit nunc inpossibile sibi esse, quod nec oculus uidit nec auris audiuit nec in cor hominis ascendit, ut uideat. scit inuisibilem esse carnalibus oculis gloriam dei. meminit, non dico ad angelorum claritates hoc humanae uisionis lumen hebetari, sed ipsam gloriam uultus Moysi humani corporis oculos non tulisse.
Then follows: "I have entreated your face with my whole heart; have mercy on me according to your word." We remember that Moses prayed to see God, and perhaps this prophet's prayer will be thought akin to his request. But he remembers that it was said by God: "No man shall see my face and live." So does he ask to be granted what he remembers was denied to Moses? But again, although he is earlier than the gospel saying, he still remembers that this blessedness is reserved for faith, because it is said: "Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God." So, since he knows that it was said in the law that no one sees God's face and lives, and does not doubt from the gospel beatitude that all the pure in heart will see God, he spoke the longing of his desire with the tempering of perfect modesty, saying: "I have entreated your face with my whole heart." He knows that it is now impossible for him to see what eye has not seen nor ear heard nor has entered the heart of man. He knows that the glory of God is invisible to fleshly eyes. He remembers that, I do not say before the brightness of angels, the light of human vision is dimmed, but that the eyes of the human body could not bear even the glory of Moses' face.
118.8.8CSEL 22:427
Sed nos ex desideriis humanis prophetae desideria metiamur. ad egressus regum quanta expectationis sollicitudine. curritur et quod uidentibus gaudium est, cum se praebuerint contuendos! quid illum caelestis spiritus capacem uirum existimabimus uelle? quanto desiderii ardore cupere, ut deum cernat, qui ipsam illam inuisibilem maiestatem per has angelorum claritates et per hanc Moysi gloriam metiatur et sciat etiam eos, qui digni sunt conspectu dei, gloriam ex conspectu gloriae esse sumpturos, quod eos uisio tantum et dignatio contemplatae maiestatis inluminet? quod sanctus apostolus ita intellegens loquitur: nos, inquit, omnes reuelata facie gloriam dei expectantes in eandem ipsam transferemur a gloria in gloriam, sicut a domini spiritu. et nunc quia id inpossibile istis corporis oculis sciat esse, toto istud corde desiderat. et est portio deus, confidenter faciem eius deprecatur: quia, quamuis nemo hominum uideat faciem dei et uiuet, tamen deum omnes mundo corde uisuri sunt. ergo misericordiam hanc a deo postulat, ut sibi uidendi faciem eius beatitudo contingat, et postulat non sine ratione modoque praestandi.
But let us measure the prophet's desires by human desires. With what anxious expectation people run to the processions of kings, and what joy it is for those who see them when they show themselves to be looked at! What shall we think that man, able to hold the heavenly Spirit, wants? With what burning desire does he long to see God, he who measures that invisible majesty through these brightnesses of angels and this glory of Moses, and knows that even those who are worthy of the sight of God will take glory from the sight of glory, because the mere seeing and the favor of the majesty they contemplate will enlighten them? The holy apostle, understanding this, says: "We all, with unveiled face, awaiting the glory of God, shall be transformed into that same image from glory to glory, as by the Spirit of the Lord." And now, because he knows this is impossible for these eyes of the body, he desires it with his whole heart. And since God is his portion, he confidently entreats his face: because, although no man sees God's face and lives, yet all the pure in heart will see God. So he asks this mercy from God, that the blessedness of seeing his face may befall him; and he asks it not without the reason and manner of its being granted.
118.8.9CSEL 22:427–428
Ait enim: miserere mei secundum eloquium tuum. fidei modestae uox est, misericordiam dei non secundum peccatorum suorum conscientiam, sed secundum eiusdem dei eloquia deprecari. scit deum etiam peccatoribus esse ignem consumentem. Moyses enim ait: deus uester ignis consumens est. nouit eundem esse fidelibus lucem, de quo et alibi propheta ipse dicit: inluminans tu mirabiliter de montibus sanctis. discernit et hanc apostolus bonitatis et seueritatis dei consuetudinem, cum ait: uide ergo bonitatem et seueritatem dei: in eos quidem, qui ceciderunt, seueritatem, in te autem bonitatem; et rursum: et nisi permaneas in bonitate, excideris: illi uero si non permaneant in infidelitate, inserentur. bonitatem dei propheta expectat,: miserere mei. scit enim neminem sine peccato esse, qui uiuat, et omnes in carne sitos misericordia dei egere. officii autem sui deuotionisque non inmemor est, cum ait: secundum eloquium tuum; eius scilicet eloquii, quo et peccatoribus poenam denuntiat et in se credentibus uitae aeternae beatitudinem pollicetur.
For he says: "Have mercy on me according to your word." It is the voice of modest faith to entreat God's mercy not according to the awareness of one's sins but according to the words of that same God. He knows that God is also a consuming fire to sinners. For Moses says: "Your God is a consuming fire." He knows that the same God is light to the faithful, of whom the prophet himself also says elsewhere: "You give light wonderfully from the holy mountains." The apostle too distinguishes this way of God's goodness and severity, when he says: "See then the goodness and severity of God: severity toward those who fell, but goodness toward you"; and again: "Otherwise you too will be cut off; and they, if they do not remain in unbelief, will be grafted in." The prophet awaits God's goodness: "Have mercy on me." For he knows that no one who lives is without sin, and that all who are placed in the flesh need God's mercy. But he is not unmindful of his duty and devotion when he says, "according to your word": that is, that word by which he both announces punishment to sinners and promises the blessedness of eternal life to those who believe in him.
118.8.10CSEL 22:428–429
Dehinc sequitur: quia cogitaui uias meas et auerti pedes meos in testimonia tua. ex his, quae propheta se gerere uel gessisse commemorat, quid nos quoque facere oporteat, docet. uias enim suas cogitat et cogitatis his pedem in testimonia dei refert. nihil egit, quod non antea cogitatione peruoluerit. non linguam in officium suum mouit, non pedem in aliquod, quod acturus esset, opus protulit, non manum ad agendum aliquid exeruit, nisi antea super his omnibus cogitasset, et tum operationem atque effectum cogitatis rebus attulerit. uidit igitur ante omnia suae uias et cum placentem sibi ac probabilem repperit, tunc in eam pedem contulit: scilicet perspectis omnibus humanae operationis uiis, postquam quid esset sibi utile cogitauit, fidei pedem in testimonia diuina detorsit. cogitatio enim nihil potest subitum, nihil nouum, nihil inopinatum pertimescere, cum de consilii sententia omnia, quae accidere solent, sperantur, praefiniuntur, adeuntur. et id consequenti uersu docetur.
Then follows: "Because I thought on my ways and turned my feet to your testimonies." From what the prophet recalls that he does or has done, he teaches what we too must do. For he thinks on his ways, and having thought on them he turns his foot to God's testimonies. He did nothing that he had not first turned over in thought. He did not move his tongue to its duty, did not put his foot forward to any work he was going to do, did not stretch out his hand to do anything, unless he had first thought about all these things, and only then brought action and effect to what he had thought. So before all things he looked at his ways, and when he found one pleasing and approved, then he set his foot on it: that is, having surveyed all the ways of human action, after he had thought what was useful to him, he turned the foot of faith toward the divine testimonies. For thought can fear nothing sudden, nothing new, nothing unexpected, since by the decision of counsel all things that usually happen are hoped for, determined beforehand, and faced. And this is taught in the following verse.
118.8.11CSEL 22:429
Postea enim quam uias suas propheta cogitauerat et pedem ad testimonia dei conuerterat, libere loquitur: paratus sum et non sum turbatus, ut custodiam mandata tua. qui ad aliquid praeparatur, longo usu ad id, in quo ei est meditatio. praeparatur, ne eum de propositi sui sententia neglegentem et incautum uis aliqua repentinae turbationis excutiat. propheta itaque nouit esse plurima saeculi scandala. nouit insidiantes esse humanae naturae aduersantesque uirtutes. scit periculose dulcem esse ambitionem gloriae. nouit occursus lasciuientium feminarum esse continentium oculis captiosos. scit turpes corporum cupiditates adfectu blandae uoluptatis inrepere. scit cetera uitiorum genera inlecebrosis aditibus ingruere. nouit etiam plurimis se inreligiosorum odiis subiacere et ob dei pietatisque doctrinam uariis persequentium contumeliis esse uexandum. ne igitur turbari tot et tantis insidiis ingruentibus posset, contra omnia se fidei excidia praeparauit dicens: paratus sum et non sum turbatus, ut custodiam mandata tua.
For after the prophet had thought on his ways and turned his foot to God's testimonies, he speaks freely: "I am prepared and not troubled, to keep your commandments." Whoever is being prepared for something is prepared by long practice for that in which his meditation lies, so that no force of sudden trouble may shake him, careless and unwary, from the resolve of his purpose. So the prophet knows that there are very many stumbling blocks of the world. He knows that there are powers lying in wait for human nature and opposing it. He knows that the ambition for glory is dangerously sweet. He knows that meetings with wanton women are a snare to the eyes of the continent. He knows that shameful desires of the body creep in with the feeling of alluring pleasure. He knows that the other kinds of vices assail by enticing approaches. He knows too that he is subject to the hatred of many irreligious men and must be harassed by the various insults of persecutors for the teaching of God and of piety. So, lest he be troubled when so many and such great snares assail him, he prepared himself against every destruction of faith, saying: "I am prepared and not troubled, to keep your commandments."
118.8.12CSEL 22:429–430
Habet parem beatus apostolus huius praeparationis suae dicens: quis nos separabit a caritate Christi? tribulatio an angustia aut passio aut fames aut nuditas aut periculum aut gladius? sicut scriptum est: quia propter te mortificamur tota die, deputati sumus sicut oues occisionis. sed in his omnibus superamus et uincimus propter eum, qui nos dilexit. et quia aduersum horum tolerantiam, ne per haec a caritate separari posset, sese praeparasset, adiecit: confido enim, quia neque mors neque uita neque angeli neque potestates neque praesentia neque futura neque uirtus neque altitudo neque profundum neque creatura alia poterit nos separare a caritate dei, quae est in Christo Iesu domino nostro. nulla apostolum rerum earum, quae accidere possunt, genera tali spe praeparatum firmatumque perturbant.
The blessed apostle has a counterpart of this preparation of his, saying: "Who will separate us from the love of Christ? Tribulation, or distress, or suffering, or famine, or nakedness, or danger, or sword? As it is written: For your sake we are put to death all day long; we are counted as sheep for slaughter. But in all these we overcome and conquer because of him who loved us." And because he had prepared himself to endure these things, so that he could not be separated from love by them, he added: "For I am confident that neither death nor life, nor angels nor powers, nor things present nor things to come, nor power nor height nor depth nor any other creature will be able to separate us from the love of God which is in Christ Jesus our Lord." No kinds of the things that can happen disturb the apostle, prepared and strengthened by such hope.
118.8.13CSEL 22:430
Sit ergo in nobis haec et uox, ut, cum subrepant cupiditates, cum passiones ingruant, cum pericula fatigent, cum supplicia crucient, dicere audeamus: paratus sum et non sum turbatus, ut custodiam mandata tua. dominus noster unigenitus dei filius inter cetera praecepta discipulis suis mandat dicens: non turbetur cor uestrum neque trepidet. aduersum turbationem, quaecumque ex accidentibus erit, longae praeparationis opus est firmitate. ut robusta fide atque firmata dei mandata custodiat.
Let this, then, be our voice too, so that when desires creep in, when sufferings assail, when dangers weary, when tortures torment, we may dare to say: "I am prepared and not troubled, to keep your commandments." Our Lord, the only-begotten Son of God, among his other precepts commands his disciples, saying: "Let not your heart be troubled, nor let it be afraid." Against trouble, whatever may come from what befalls us, there is need of the firmness of long preparation, so that one may keep God's commandments with strong and firm faith.
118.8.14CSEL 22:430–431
In quem autem se profectum quamue in causam propheta, neque turbatus sit, quousque custodiret mandata dei, continuo subiecit dicens: funes peccatorum circumplexi sunt mihi; et legem tuam non sum oblitus. esse peccatorum funes per Esaiam docemur dicentem:, qui ligant peccata tamquam funem longum, modo funis ex plurimis minimis crescentis in multum peccata semper tamquam longo fune tendentibus. sunt etiam delictorum uincula, quibus humanae mentes inligantur, de quibus in prouerbiis scriptum est: u in cui i S suorum peccatorum unusquisque constringitur. stringit enim nos atque alligat et his funibus inplicat diabolus in omni uitae laqueos. quod autem liget, in euangeliis cognouimus,: hanc autem filiam ligauit satanas annis decem et octo. ligat igitur omni uitiorum genere, ebrietatis consuetudine, uoluptatum desideriis, infidelitatis piaculo. sed inter hos funium laqueos non est admittenda legis obliuio. praeparatos enim esse nos, ut ab his laqueis, si quando circumligent. exuamur, ut legis dei omni tempore recordemur.
Into what condition the prophet had come, and for what cause he was not troubled while he kept God's commandments, he immediately added, saying: "The cords of sinners have wound around me, and I have not forgotten your law." That there are cords of sinners we are taught by Isaiah, who says: "Woe to those who bind their sins like a long rope," in the manner of a rope growing from many tiny strands into a great one, as sins always stretch out like a long rope. There are also the chains of offenses with which human minds are bound, of which it is written in Proverbs: "Each one is bound by the cords of his own sins." For the devil binds us and ties us and entangles us in these cords as snares in every part of life. That he binds we know from the gospels: "But this daughter, whom Satan has bound for eighteen years." He binds, then, with every kind of vice: with the habit of drunkenness, with desires for pleasures, with the guilt of unbelief. But amid these snares of cords, forgetfulness of the law must not be admitted. For we must be prepared so that we may be freed from these snares, if ever they wind around us, by remembering God's law at all times.
118.8.15CSEL 22:431–432
Et recordatur plane propheta dicens: media nocte surgebam ad confitendum tibi super iudicia iustificationis tuae. non uacat totis noctibus nec otiosus lecto continetur: ad confitendum deo non solum nocte, sed etiam media nocte consurgit. meminit hoc esse tempus, quo primitiae Aegyptiorum meritissima impiae obstinationis clade percussae sunt; his ergo horis non laxatur in somnum, ne Aegypti admisceatur. hoc noctis tempore introeunte sponso sapientes uirgines in cum lampadibus introibunt; uigilat ergo, ne cum stultis mereatur excludi. hoc tempore psallentibus Paulo et Silea apostolis catenae et resoluuntur: non dormit itaque, ne uinctus sit. nec habet eum totus nocturni temporis somnus, ne ei obliuio officii sui requie mediae noctis obrepat; surgit enim ad confitendum deo. confessio uero non semper ad peccata referenda est, uerum etiam in dei laudibus intellegenda est. nunc ergo confitetur deo super iudicia eius, laudans igitur deum, quod nihil nisi in iudiciorum iustificatione decreuerit.
And the prophet plainly remembers it, saying: "At midnight I rose to confess to you over the judgments of your justification." He is not idle all night, nor is he kept idle in bed: to confess to God he rises not only at night but at midnight. He remembers that this is the time when the firstborn of the Egyptians were struck by the well-deserved destruction of their impious obstinacy; so at these hours he does not slacken into sleep, lest he be counted with the firstborn of Egypt. At this time of night, when the bridegroom enters, the wise virgins will go in with their lamps; so he keeps watch, lest he deserve to be shut out with the foolish. At this time, while the apostles Paul and Silas were singing psalms, their chains were loosed; so he does not sleep, lest he be bound. Nor does the whole sleep of the night-time hold him, lest forgetfulness of his duty creep upon him in the rest of midnight; for he rises to confess to God. But confession is not always to be referred to sins; it must also be understood in the praises of God. So now he confesses to God over his judgments, praising God, that is, because he has decreed nothing except in the justification of his judgments.
118.8.16CSEL 22:432–433
Sequitur deinde: particeps sum ego omnium timentium te et custodientium mandata tua. apostolum dixisse meminimus: participes Christi facti sumus. sed et in quadragesimo quarto psalmo quosdam participes dei significatos esse meminimus, cum dicitur: unxit te deus, deus tuus oleum exultationis prae consortes tuos. sunt ergo secundum apostolum et secundum prophetam plures domini nostri Iesu Christi participes. et particeps eius, quisque in iustitia manet, quia ipse iustitia est: particeps eius erit, quisque in ueritate persistit, ipse est enim ueritas: et quisque in nouitate ambulabit, erit particeps eius, quia ipse est resurrectio. ergo cum sciat propheta plures dei esse participes, nunc per ac modestam de se praedicationem, cum se, quia et ipse Christus et factus et dictus sit, Christi meminerit esse participem, tamen omnium timentium deum potius se confessus est esse participem. est autem etiam tunc timentium deum particeps, cum patientibus conpatitur, cum plorantibus conplorat, cum tamquam eiusdem corporis membrum in dolore membri alterius dolet. hac igitur passionum communione timentium deum particeps fit. ceterum quisquis per insolentiam suam credentem in Christo et redemptum a Christo dedignatur,,, non est ille timentium deum particeps, quibus non sit in conpatiendis passionibus consors.
Then follows: "I am a partaker with all who fear you and keep your commandments." We remember that the apostle said: "We have become partakers of Christ." And in the forty-fourth psalm too we remember that certain partakers of God are signified, when it is said: "God, your God, has anointed you with the oil of gladness above your fellows." So, according to the apostle and according to the prophet, there are many partakers of our Lord Jesus Christ. And whoever remains in righteousness is his partaker, because he himself is righteousness; whoever persists in truth will be his partaker, for he himself is the truth; and whoever walks in newness will be his partaker, because he himself is the resurrection. So, although the prophet knows that there are many partakers of God, now by a humble and modest statement about himself, although he remembers that he is a partaker of Christ, since he himself was both made and called an anointed one, he nevertheless confessed himself rather a partaker of all who fear God. And he is a partaker of those who fear God when he suffers with those who suffer, weeps with those who weep, grieves as a member of the same body in the pain of another member. By this fellowship of sufferings, then, he becomes a partaker of those who fear God. But whoever in his insolence disdains one who believes in Christ and is redeemed by Christ is not a partaker of those who fear God, since he is not their companion in sharing their sufferings.
118.8.17CSEL 22:433
Non nudum autem hoc neque solitarium propheta posuit, cum dicit: particeps sum ego omnium timentium te. plures sunt timentes deum et tamen inoboedientes: plures sunt timentes deum et tamen infideles, quos naturae condicio timori quidem dei subdit, sed uoluntatis suae peruersitas ab obsequiis dei. atque ob id non suffecisset prophetam dixisse: particeps sum ego omnium timentium te, nisi addidisset: et custodientium mandata tua. timor enim fidei in sola oboedientia est et metus religionis in obsequella est. horum itaque particeps est, qui timorem suum in mandatorum dei custodia conprobabunt.
But the prophet did not put this bare and alone when he says, "I am a partaker with all who fear you." Many fear God and yet are disobedient; many fear God and yet are unbelieving, whom the condition of nature subjects to the fear of God, but the perversity of their own will removes from obedience to God. And therefore it would not have been enough for the prophet to say, "I am a partaker with all who fear you," unless he had added, "and who keep your commandments." For the fear that belongs to faith lies only in obedience, and the awe of religion lies in compliance. So he is a partaker of those who prove their fear by keeping God's commandments.
118.8.18CSEL 22:433
Dehinc sequitur: misericordia tua, domine, plena est terra, iustificationes tuas doce me. terra misericordia dei plena est, quae contaminata, quae corrupta. quae inreligiosa, quae infida, quae perdita est. et si quis forte audebit impio ore prophetam arguere, tamquam non in omnem terram dei misericordiam putet esse diffusam, dominum in euangeliis recolat dixisse: estote boni, sicut pater uester, qui est in, qui solem suum oriri facit super bonos et malos et pluit super iustos et iniustos. patiens enim et miserator deus, dum mauult peccatorum quam mortem, dona sua iustis iniustisque largitur, unicuique per patientiam longae tempus inpertiens.
Then follows: "The earth is full of your mercy, Lord; teach me your justifications." The earth is full of God's mercy, though it is defiled, corrupt, irreligious, faithless, and lost. And if anyone dares with impious mouth to accuse the prophet, as though he thought God's mercy were not spread over all the earth, let him recall that the Lord said in the gospels: "Be good, as your Father who is in heaven, who makes his sun rise on the good and the evil, and sends rain on the just and the unjust." For God, patient and merciful, while he prefers the repentance of sinners to their death, lavishes his gifts on the just and unjust, granting to each through his patience a long time for repentance.
118.8.19CSEL 22:433–434
Et quia hanc bonitatem dei et perfectionem, quae sub illis iustificationibus legis corporaliter adumbratur, meminit semper sibi propheta sperandam, ait: iustificationes tuas doce me, domine. omnes in lege legerat; sed quia caelestes sperabat, quae in terrenis, non eget doctore terreno. doceri enim se ab eo orat, qui ait: petite et dabitur; et inuenietis; pulsate et aperietur uobis. aperiri sibi et dari a doctore legis dedignatur propheta. scientiae caelestis expectans magistrum dominum nostrum Iesum Christum, cui est gloria in saecula saeculorum. amen.
And because the prophet remembers that this goodness and perfection of God, which is foreshadowed bodily under those justifications of the law, must always be hoped for by him, he says: "Teach me your justifications, Lord." He had read all of them in the law; but because he hoped for the heavenly ones which are foreshadowed in the earthly, he does not need an earthly teacher. For he prays to be taught by him who says: "Ask, and it will be given you; seek, and you will find; knock, and it will be opened to you." The prophet disdains to have it opened and given to him by a teacher of the law, awaiting as master of heavenly knowledge our Lord Jesus Christ, to whom be glory for ever and ever. Amen.
Tractates 118, chapter 9
118.9.1CSEL 22:434–435
Iam in exordio psalmi commemorauimus nihil aliud in eo quam doctrinam humanae contineri, per quam ad cognitionem dei ipsis, tamquam paruoli, litterarum elementis erudiremur. ex persona enim sua nos propheta confirmat, qualiter in omni genere diuini officii uersari nos oporteret, ut per disciplinam adeptae institutionis fidei ordinem teneremus, ut ipso illo primo nonae litterae uersu docetur. ita enim dicitur: bonitatem fecisti cum seruo tuo, domine, secundum uerbum tuum. et forte quidam existimabunt de secundis rebus prophetam locutum deoque gratiam ob ea, quae sibi prospere acciderint, rettulisse. sed nouit etiam in aduersis rebus gratiam deo esse referendam; scit in omni passione ac tribulatione eum, cuius iudicio ingruunt, gratulationibus honorandum. scit indiligentem esse medicum putribus uulnerum sinibus parcentem. meminit piam esse patrum in filios seueritatem. argui se per temptationes ac probari per patientiam a deo optat; et in his, quae aduersa existimantur, agit gratiam.
We already noted at the beginning of the psalm that it contains nothing other than teaching for human beings, by which we might be trained to the knowledge of God through the very elements of letters, like little children. For the prophet strengthens us from his own person, showing how we ought to be occupied in every kind of divine duty, so that through the discipline of the instruction we have received we may keep the order of faith, as is taught in that first verse of the ninth letter. For it says thus: "You have dealt kindly with your servant, Lord, according to your word." And perhaps some will think that the prophet spoke of prosperity and gave thanks to God for the things that had gone well for him. But he knows that thanks must be given to God in adversity too; he knows that in every suffering and tribulation he by whose judgment they come must be honored with thanksgiving. He knows that a physician who spares the festering pockets of wounds is careless. He remembers that the severity of fathers toward their sons is loving. He wishes to be reproved by God through temptations and proved through patience; and he gives thanks in the things that are thought adverse.
118.9.2CSEL 22:435
Atque hanc nostram intellegentiam, ut id prophetam orasse credamus, uersus, qui subiectus est, docet dicens: bonitatem et disciplinam et scientiam doce me, quia mandatis tuis parui. quidquid ergo deus in seruum facit, bonum est; secundum enim uerbum suum facit. et quidquid secundum eius est, non potest malum, quia ei, qui solus bonus est, uoluntas sit prona bonitatis.
And the verse that is added teaches this understanding of ours, so that we believe the prophet prayed this, saying: "Teach me goodness and discipline and knowledge, because I have obeyed your commandments." Whatever God does to his servant, then, is good; for he does it according to his word. And whatever is according to his word cannot be evil, because the will of him who alone is good is inclined to goodness.
118.9.3CSEL 22:435–436
Versus itaque, ut diximus, secundus prophetae exponit adfectum, cum orat dicens: et bonitatem et disciplinam et scientiam doce me. bonitatem superius confessus est erga se factam; quomodo hanc quasi ignorans doceri se precatur? nisi quod tunc fuerit ex fidei confessione gratulatio, cum, quidquid illud fieret in se, id esse bonum credidit: nunc uero est per naturam humanam ignorantiae causa, cum ut doceatur orat. sed eam bonitatem uult discere, cui disciplina sit iuncta. disciplinam enim necesse est esse seueritatis officium peccata arguentis et uitia corrigentis. correctio uero uitiorum magnum adfert in bonitate profectum. bona ergo est seueritatis disciplina, sed adhuc eam propheta ignorat. non enim tantum bonitatem et disciplinam, sed etiam scientiam uult doceri: in eo fidei suae ostendens, cum bonitatem et disciplinam, quam nondum sciat, tamen bonam sibi a deo esse fateatur. de scientia autem locis plurimis admonuimus, hanc et apostolum, hanc et prophetam inter gratiarum spiritalium dona numerasse. ergo ut bonitatem et disciplinam, ita et scientiam doceri orat, et doceri ob id, quia mandatis dei credat: ostendens non nisi fideles atque credentes consequi posse doctrinam.
So the second verse, as we said, sets out the prophet's disposition, when he prays, saying: "And teach me goodness and discipline and knowledge." He confessed above that goodness had been done toward him; how then does he pray to be taught it as if he did not know it? Only because then there was thanksgiving from the confession of faith, when he believed that whatever was done to him was good; but now, through human nature, there is cause of ignorance, when he prays to be taught. But he wants to learn that goodness to which discipline is joined. For discipline must be the work of severity, reproving sins and correcting vices. And the correction of vices brings great progress in goodness. Good, then, is the discipline of severity, but the prophet does not yet know it. For he wants to be taught not only goodness and discipline but also knowledge: showing in this his faith, since he confesses that goodness and discipline, which he does not yet know, are nevertheless good for him from God. Of knowledge we have reminded you in many places that both the apostle and the prophet counted it among the gifts of spiritual graces. So he prays to be taught knowledge as he does goodness and discipline; and to be taught because he believes God's commandments: showing that only the faithful and believing can attain teaching.
118.9.4CSEL 22:436
Manet autem etiam in tertio uersu eiusdem intellegentiae sensus. ait enim: priusquam humiliarer,; propterea eloquium tuum ego custodiui. non prius tribulatio passionum ingruit, quam delicta praecedant; neque per passiones ante humiliamur, quam per peccatorum iniquitatem digni passionibus simus. docet itaque propheta humiliationem suam emendationem esse delicti; atque ob id bonum scit esse sibi quidquid a deo est, quia pati meruit, quod pati. et scit disciplinam emendationem esse uitiorum. prius ergo deliquit, secundo autem humiliatus est, et per humilitatis disciplinam oportet eum, ne, doceri et in eloquiis dei manere, quia iam sit delinquens humiliatus et in mandatis dei, ne ultra possit peccare, mansurus sit.
The sense of the same understanding remains also in the third verse. For he says: "Before I was humbled, I sinned; therefore I have kept your word." The tribulation of sufferings does not come upon us before offenses come first; nor are we humbled by sufferings before we are worthy of sufferings through the iniquity of sins. So the prophet teaches that his humiliation is the amendment of his offense; and therefore he knows that whatever comes from God is good for him, because he deserved to suffer what he suffers. And he knows that discipline is the amendment of vices. First, then, he sinned; second, he was humbled; and through the discipline of humility he must be taught and remain in God's words, because, having sinned, he has now been humbled and will remain in God's commandments so that he can sin no more.
118.9.5CSEL 22:436–437
Bonus es, domine: et in bonitate tua doce me iustificationes tuas. scit iustificationes dei propheta bonas esse, quia bonus sit, qui eas statuit. scit sibi nihil nisi ex iustificatione dei accidere, quia professus sit prius se deliquisse, dehinc postea esse humiliatum. et quia superius orasset, ut bonitatem et disciplinam et scientiam doceretur, nunc orat, ut iustificationes dei in bonitate doceatur: quia iustificatio opus sit rei iustae, quse sibi sit, quia iustificationes, quae in lege sunt constitutae. umbram in se iustificationum caelestium continerent.
"You are good, Lord; and in your goodness teach me your justifications." The prophet knows that God's justifications are good, because he who established them is good. He knows that nothing happens to him except by God's justification, since he professed that first he sinned and then afterwards was humbled. And because above he had prayed to be taught goodness, discipline, and knowledge, now he prays to be taught God's justifications in goodness: because justification is the work of a just thing, which is to his good, since the justifications established in the law contained in themselves the shadow of the heavenly justifications.
118.9.6CSEL 22:437
Deinde adiecit: multiplicata est super me iniquitas superborum: ego autem in toto corde mandata tua. patienter omnia et aequanimiter propheta tolerans in opprobrium superborum atque iniquorum deductus est. si quis enim obiurgationes trium regum in Iob recolat, intelleget, quanto inludentium exacerbetur opprobrio. namque cum inreligiosi quique per passiones aliquas emendari dei seruos contuentur, exprobrare haec ita solent: "ubi fides? ubi spes in deum? ubi auxiliantis uirtus? ubi boni dei misericordia est?" contra firmo animo fidelique opus est et in mandatis dei intento atque occupato, ne multiplicatis tot in se superborum iniquitatibus cedat, sed semper dicat: bonitatem fecisti cum seruo tuo. domine; ut ait ille passionum humanarum gloriosus et beatus uictor: dominus dedit, dominus abstulit, sit nomen domini.
Then he added: "The iniquity of the proud has been multiplied against me; but I will search your commandments with my whole heart." The prophet, bearing all things patiently and calmly, was brought into the reproach of the proud and wicked. For if anyone recalls the reproofs of the three kings to Job, he will understand how much he is embittered by the reproach of mockers. For when irreligious people see God's servants being corrected through some sufferings, they usually reproach them thus: "Where is your faith? Where is your hope in God? Where is the power of the helper? Where is the mercy of the good God?" Against this there is need of a firm and faithful mind, intent and occupied in God's commandments, so as not to give way when so many iniquities of the proud are multiplied against it, but always to say: "You have dealt kindly with your servant, Lord"; as that glorious and blessed conqueror of human sufferings said: "The Lord gave, the Lord has taken away; blessed be the name of the Lord."
118.9.7CSEL 22:437–438
Deinde sequitur: coagulauit sicut lac cor eorum: ego uero legem tuam meditatus sum. cor superborum ait sicut lac. lac specie et sapore blandissimum est; quod uitio aliquo corruptum coagulari solet et ex naturae suae suauitate decedens inutili sapore amaroque corrumpitur. ergo antea iniqui, cum in secundis rebus esse prophetam contuerentur, felicium rerum amici, simplicitatis specie blandientes tamquam lac fuerunt. at ubi eos ab humilitate sancti uiri superbia et fastidium tenuit, er laete coagulati sunt et ex blandis ac suauibus adulationibus in uitiosi et coacescentis saporis amaritudinem sunt redacti. his uero sicut lac coagulatis legem tamen dei propheta meditatus est: meditatus autem in id, ut diceret, quod sequenti uersu continetur.
Then follows: "Their heart has curdled like milk; but I have meditated on your law." He says the heart of the proud is like milk. Milk is most pleasant in appearance and taste; when corrupted by some fault it usually curdles, and departing from the sweetness of its nature it is spoiled into a useless and bitter taste. So the wicked, earlier, when they saw the prophet in prosperity, friends of good fortune, flattering with an appearance of simplicity, were like milk. But when pride and disdain for the holy man's humiliation took hold of them, they curdled like milk and were turned from flattering and sweet adulation into the bitterness of a spoiled and souring taste. Yet while they were curdled like milk, the prophet meditated on God's law: meditated, that is, so as to say what is contained in the following verse.
118.9.8CSEL 22:438
Bonum mihi, quod humiliasti me. iniquitas licet superborum multiplicetur et cor eorum ut lac coaguletur, scit humiliationem tamen suam sibi propheta bonam esse, nouit in infirmitatibus perfici. bona omnis passio, bonae omnes tribulationes, per quas iustificationes dei cognoscuntur: ut peccantes humilitate emendet., ut delinquentes seueritate coerceat, ut ignorantes doctrina doceat. idcirco enim bonum sibi, quod humiliatus est, ait, quia per humiliationem iustificationes dei disceret. deliquit enim, priusquam humiliaretur, et humilitas ei bonum est, quia per eam iustificatio dei discitur.
"It is good for me that you have humbled me." Though the iniquity of the proud is multiplied and their heart curdles like milk, the prophet knows that his humiliation is good for him; he knows that strength is made perfect in weakness. Good is every suffering, good are all tribulations, through which God's justifications are known: so that he may amend sinners by humiliation, restrain offenders by severity, teach the ignorant by teaching. For this reason he says it is good for him that he was humbled, because through humiliation he learned God's justifications. For he sinned before he was humbled, and humility is good for him, because through it God's justification is learned.
118.9.9CSEL 22:438–439
Conclusit autem: bonum mihi lex oris tui super milies auri et argenti. non est simplex conclusionis istius sermo. suffecerat enim ad prophetae gratulationem dixisse: bonum mihi est lex tua. sed cum ait: lex oris tui, plus uoluit intellegi. locutus est deus per Moysen legem, locutus est per prophetas: sed haec lex dei est, non etiam lex oris dei. os autem dei est ille, qui et uirtus dei est, qui et sapientia dei est, qui et bracchium dei est, qui et imago dei est, deus scilicet et dominus noster Iesus Christus dicens: beati pauperes spiritu, quoniam ipsorum est regnum, dicens: beati lugentes, quia ipsi consolabuntur, dicens: benedicite, qui uos persecuntur, et orate pro calumniantibus uobis. hanc legem oris dei bonum sibi esse propheta est: et bonum non cum conparationis et definitionis et modi numero, sed super milies auri et argenti. indefinitus hic sermo est. cum dicitur milies, quia indefinite bona est lex oris dei: ei conparatione uero rerum maxime in terris pretiosarum utilitatem bonorum eorum, quae a deo sunt statuta, significans.
He concluded: "The law of your mouth is good to me above thousands of gold and silver." The wording of this conclusion is not simple. For it would have been enough for the prophet's thanksgiving to say, "Your law is good to me." But when he says "the law of your mouth," he wanted more to be understood. God spoke the law through Moses, he spoke through the prophets; but this is the law of God, not also the law of God's mouth. But the mouth of God is he who is also the power of God, who is also the wisdom of God, who is also the arm of God, who is also the image of God, namely God and our Lord Jesus Christ, saying: "Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom"; saying: "Blessed are those who mourn, for they shall be comforted"; saying: "Bless those who persecute you, and pray for those who slander you." The prophet declares that this law of God's mouth is good to him; and good not with a number of comparison, limit, and measure, but "above thousands of gold and silver." This expression is without limit, when "thousands" is said, because the law of God's mouth is good without limit; and by comparison with the most precious things on earth he signifies the usefulness of the goods that are established by God.
Tractates 118, chapter 10
118.10.1CSEL 22:439–440
Commune iudicium est, inter omnia terrena dei opera nihil homine utilius, nihil esse speciosius: quia, etsi sint aliqua pulchra et ornata. magnitudinem quidem eius, qui ea tam decora genuerit, testantur, uerum speciei et ornatus et institutionis suae fructum ipsa non sentiunt. loquimur enim de his, quae humano subiecta conspectui sunt, scilicet de creatis in terra et mari et aere, et singulis quibusque generibus naturisque permixta sunt. pulchra haec; sed quod tandem in oceano aut terra aut caelo aut aere bonum, quae in his creata sunt, eo, quod talia creata sunt, consequentur? in homine autem quidquid est, sibi proficit. et hoc unum in terris animal rationale, intellegens, diiudicans, constitutum est; horumque omnium generum, in eo sunt, nihil ad aliud aliquid proficit quam ut ipse et ceteris aliis et his, in quibus est natus, utatur: utatur autem ad cognoscendum uenerandumque eum, qui tantorum in se bonorum auctor et parens sit.
It is the common judgment that among all God's earthly works nothing is more useful, nothing more beautiful than man: because, even if some things are beautiful and adorned, they testify indeed to the greatness of him who brought forth such fair things, but they themselves do not perceive the fruit of their beauty, adornment, and formation. We are speaking of the things subject to human sight, namely those created on land, in sea, and in air, and mingled in their several kinds and natures. These are beautiful; but what good, after all, will the things created in the ocean, earth, sky, or air gain from the fact that they were created such? But in man, whatever there is profits himself. And he alone on earth was established as a rational, understanding, and judging animal; and of all these kinds that are in him, none serves any other purpose than that he himself should use both all the others and those in which he was born: and use them for knowing and worshipping him who is the author and parent of such great goods in him.
118.10.2CSEL 22:440
Ex quo magnum illud atque mirabile Salomonis dictum esse intellegetur, quod tale est: et uir misericors: uirum uero fidelem opus est inuenire. quid enim tam est, quidue tam ardui operis est quam inuenire eum, qui meminerit se secundum imaginem et similitudinem dei esse factum, qui diuinorum eloquiorum studio intentus rationem animae suae corporisque cognouerit et originem utriusque generis naturamque perceperit, ad quem denique finem haec institutio sua ortusque contendat? atque ob id magnum quiddam est homo. hoc enim nomen, ubi superius commemoratarum cognitione neglecta in uitia deciderit, amittit, indignus scilicet iam iudicatus homo nuncupari, et qui non secundum imaginem et similitudinem dei factus sit; sed secundum exprobrationes propheticas et euangelicas aut aut progenies uiperarum aut equus aut mulus aut uulpis ei nomen est, et proprietas ei nominis sui, ut ab innocentia sua exciderit, aufertur.
From this that great and wonderful saying of Solomon will be understood, which runs thus: "A great and precious thing is a merciful man; but a faithful man is hard to find." For what is so rare, or what is of such hard labor, as to find one who remembers that he was made according to the image and likeness of God, who, intent on the study of the divine words, has known the reason of his soul and body and perceived the origin and nature of each kind, and toward what end, finally, this formation and birth of his tends? And for this reason man is something great. For he loses this name when, neglecting the knowledge of the things mentioned above, he has fallen into vices, judged unworthy now to be called man, and as one not made according to the image and likeness of God; but according to the reproaches of the prophets and the gospels, his name is serpent, or brood of vipers, or horse, or mule, or fox; and the proper character of his name is taken from him as he falls from his innocence.
118.10.3CSEL 22:440–441
Verum qui studiosa fide doctrinam dei et praecepta scrutatus sit et per studium dignum se uelit. qui secundum imaginem et similitudinem dei factus sit, uti et ipse prophetae uoce poterit dicentis: manus tuae fecerunt me et praeparauerunt me. et in aliquibus codicibus ita scriptum deprehendimus: manus tuae fecerunt me et finxerunt me: da mihi intellectum, tua. et sine dubio non otiosum esse existimandum est, quod non satis erat prophetam dixisse: manus tuae fecerunt me, nisi adiecisset finxerunt uel praeparauerunt; sed honorem condicionis propheta intellegens specialem originis suae in hoc significare uoluit dignitatem. primum dicens: manus tuae fecerunt me.
But one who has searched God's teaching and precepts with zealous faith and wishes, by his zeal, to be worthy of being one made according to the image and likeness of God, will be able himself to use the prophet's voice, saying: "Your hands have made me and prepared me." And in some manuscripts we have found it written thus: "Your hands have made me and fashioned me; give me understanding, and I will learn your commandments." And without doubt it must not be thought idle that it was not enough for the prophet to say, "Your hands have made me," unless he had added "fashioned" or "prepared"; but the prophet, understanding the honor of his condition, wanted to signify by this the special dignity of his origin, first saying: "Your hands have made me."
118.10.4CSEL 22:441
In creatione mundi omnia uerbo effecta esse accepimus, cum dicitur: fiat lux, cum dicitur: fiat firmamentum, cum dicitur: et pareat arida, cum dicitur: germinet terra herbam pabuli seminantem semen secundum genus, cum dicitur: fiant luminaria in firmamento, cum dicitur: eiciant aquae reptilia animarum uiuarum. ergo omne, ex quo uel in quo mundi totius corpus est, originem sumit ex dicto et subsistere in id, quod est, ex uerbo dei. uerum de homine ita deus locutus est: faciamus hominem ad imaginem et similitudinem nostram. differt itaque natura et origo hominis ab uniuersae creationis: et proprie de eo ante tractatur et confirmatur, ut fiat, cum cetera sine quadam consilii sententia esse sint iussa. habet ergo primam hanc origo hominis dignitatem, quod ei proprium fuit de se ante tractari.
In the creation of the world we have received that all things were made by a word, when it is said, "Let there be light," when it is said, "Let there be a firmament," when it is said, "And let the dry land appear," when it is said, "Let the earth bring forth the herb of pasture, yielding seed according to its kind," when it is said, "Let there be lights in the firmament," when it is said, "Let the waters bring forth creeping things with living souls." So everything from which or in which the body of the whole world exists takes its origin from a saying, and subsists in what it is from the word of God. But concerning man God spoke thus: "Let us make man in our image and likeness." So the nature and origin of man differ from those of the whole creation: and he is properly deliberated on beforehand and confirmed, that he should be made, whereas the other things were commanded to exist without any decision of counsel. The origin of man therefore has this first dignity, that it was proper to it to be deliberated on beforehand.
118.10.5CSEL 22:441–442
Verum et in hoc praesenti prophetico dicto ingens humanae originis priuilegium continetur. non enim manus domini pecora et aquatilia et uolatilia fecerunt: nusquam istud. tradiderunt. egregium hoc itaque et praeclarum in homine est, quia a ceteris dignitate operationis excipitur. de confirmatione autem caeli ita quodam in loco legimus: ego manu mea firmaui caelum. ergo operationi hominis istud elementum, cum idipsum manu dei firmatum esse memoratur? sed quamquam caelum manu, homo tamen manibus. praestat ergo officio unius manus duarum operatio: et id, quod ad confirmationem satis est, in hominis condicione non sufficit. intellegendum autem est, cur manibus propheta se factum esse dicat, neque solum factum, sed etiam figuratum uel praeparatum.
And in this present prophetic saying too a great privilege of human origin is contained. For the Lord's hands did not make cattle and fish and birds: nowhere is that handed down. This, then, is excellent and splendid in man, that he is set apart from the rest by the dignity of the work. Of the establishing of the heaven we read in a certain place thus: "With my hand I established the heaven." Is that element, then, preferred to the making of man, since it is recorded that it was established by God's hand? But though heaven was made by a hand, man was made by hands. So the work of two hands surpasses the service of one: and what is enough for establishing is not enough in the making of man. But we must understand why the prophet says he was made by hands, and not only made, but also fashioned or prepared.
118.10.6CSEL 22:442
Ceterorum omnium elementorum creatio eo ipso in tempore et instituta et effecta est, quo subsistere iubebatur, neque inchoationem eorum et perfectionem tempus aliquod discernit; nam consummationem inchoatio in eo, quod est, percepit homo uero, cum internam et externam in se naturam dissonantem aliam ab alia contineat et ex duobus generibus in unum sit rationis particeps constitutus, duplici est institutus exordio. primum enim dictum est: faciamus hominem ad imaginem et similitudinem nostram; dehinc secundo: et accepit deus puluerem de terra et hominem.
The creation of all the other elements was both established and completed at the very moment in which they were commanded to exist, and no time separates their beginning from their completion; for the beginning received completion in what each is. But man, since he contains within himself an inner and an outer nature, discordant one with another, and was made a sharer of reason out of two kinds into one, was established with a twofold beginning. For first it was said: "Let us make man in our image and likeness"; then, second: "And God took dust from the earth and formed man."
118.10.7CSEL 22:442–443
Primum opus non habet in se adsumptae aliunde alterius naturae originem. incorporale est, quidquid illud tum de consilii sententia inchoatur: fit enim ad imaginem dei. non dei imago, quia imago dei est primogenitus omnis creaturae; sed ad imaginem, id est secundum imaginis et similitudinis speciem. diuinum in eo et incorporale condendum, quod secundum imaginem dei et similitudinem tum fiebat: exemplum scilicet quoddam in nobis imaginis dei est et similitudinis. est ergo in rationali et incorporali animae nostrae substantia primam, quod ad imaginem dei factum sit. secundi uero operis efficientia quanto differt ab institutione prima? deus terra accepit. nam sumitur puluis, et terrena materies formatur in hominem uel praeparatur et ex alio in aliud opere ac studio artificis expolitur. primum ergo non accepit, sed fecit: secundum non ut primum fecit. sed accepit et tum formauit uel praeparauit.
The first work does not contain in itself an origin of another nature taken from elsewhere. Whatever is then begun by the decision of counsel is incorporeal: for it is made after the image of God. Not the image of God, because the image of God is the firstborn of all creation; but after the image, that is, according to the form of image and likeness. What was then made according to the image and likeness of God was to be founded as divine and incorporeal in him: namely, a certain copy of the image and likeness of God is in us. So it is in the rational and incorporeal substance of our soul that what was made after the image of God first exists. But how much does the working of the second work differ from the first formation? God took from the earth. For dust is taken, and earthly matter is formed or prepared into man and is polished from one thing into another by the work and care of the craftsman. So the first he did not take, but made; the second he did not make like the first, but took and then formed or prepared.
118.10.8CSEL 22:443–444
Utrumque autem intellegi recte potest, quia utrumque scriptum deprehendimus: ut formauerit in id, quod est, corporis scilicet speciem. uel in id, quod dicitur: et inspirauit in eum spiritum, et factus est homo in animam uiuentem. inspirationi ergo huic praeparatus siue formatus est, per quam natura animae et corporis in perfectionem quodam inspirati spiritus foedere contineretur. scit in se duplicem beatus apostolus Paulus esse naturam, cum secundum interiorem hominem delectatur in lege et cum aliam in membris suis uidet legem. se captiuum ducat in lege peccati. quod ergo fit secundum imaginem dei, ad animi pertinet dignitatem. quod autem formatur ex terra, speciei corporis primordium est. et quia uel locutus ad alterum deus intellegitur, cum dicit: faciamus hominem, uel triplex cognoscitur hominis facti formatique perfectio, cum et fit ad imaginem dei et formatur e terra et inspiratione spiritus in uiuentem animam commouetur, idcirco manibus se factum et formatum, non manu tantum propheta testatur, quia in constitutione sua et non solitarii tantum et eadem triplex fuisse docetur operatio.
Both can rightly be understood, because we find both written: that he formed him into what he is, namely the form of a body, or into what is said: "And he breathed into him a spirit, and man became a living soul." So he was prepared or formed for this inbreathing, through which the nature of soul and body would be held together in completeness by a kind of covenant of the breathed spirit. The blessed apostle Paul knows that there is a double nature in him, when according to the inner man he delights in the law, and when he sees another law in his members which leads him captive in the law of sin. So what is made according to the image of God belongs to the dignity of the mind; but what is formed from the earth is the beginning of the form of the body. And because either God is understood to have spoken to another when he says, "Let us make man," or the perfection of man made and formed is recognized as threefold, since he is both made after the image of God and formed from the earth and moved into a living soul by the inbreathing of the spirit, therefore the prophet testifies that he was made and formed by hands, not by a hand only, because in his constitution the work is taught to have been not of one alone, and also threefold.
118.10.9CSEL 22:444
Et quia istud sciat propheta ualde esse occultum et reconditum, quatenus scilicet manibus dei formatus sit, tamen, ut plenam atque absolutam huius rationem, ait: da mihi intellectum, et discam mandata tua. et tamquam ignorans haec loquitur et tamquam nondum intellegentiam adeptus dari sibi intellegentiam deprecatur: et audent non dico ecclesiae homines, sed gentium quaedam de naturae humanae institutione uelle tractare: audemus etiam gloriari rectae ac perfectae nos uitae esse consecutos. sed doceri nos oportet prophetae huius exemplo, ut uel diuinarum rerum ignorantiam confiteamur uel ignoratarum intellegentiam deprecemur. optimum est autem caelestium mandatorum scientiam a deo per precem postulare et infirmitatem ingenii nostri paupertatemque cognoscere. primum enim secundum apostolum munus est gratiarum sapientiae donum, sequens scientiae; et idcirco hunc ordinem etiam hic propheta seruauit dicens: da mihi intellectum. et discam mandata tua. primum, post etiam scientiam deprecatus est.
And because the prophet knows that this is very hidden and secret, namely how far he was formed by God's hands, yet, in order to attain a full and complete account of it, he says: "Give me understanding, and I will learn your commandments." He speaks as one who does not know these things and prays for understanding to be given him as one who has not yet attained it; and yet some, I do not say men of the church, but of the nations, dare to wish to treat of the formation of human nature; we even dare to boast that we have attained a right and perfect life. But we must be taught by this prophet's example either to confess our ignorance of divine things or to pray for understanding of what we do not know. It is best to ask God by prayer for the knowledge of heavenly commandments and to recognize the weakness and poverty of our mind. For according to the apostle the first gift of graces is the gift of wisdom, the next that of knowledge; and therefore the prophet kept this order here too, saying: "Give me understanding, and I will learn your commandments." First he prayed for understanding, afterwards also for knowledge.
118.10.10CSEL 22:444–445
Sequitur deinde: qui timent te, uidebunt me et, quia in uerba tua speraui. consuetudo impiorum est, ut conspectis religiosis uiris tristes sint. oderit enim necesse est ebriosus sobrium, continentem inpudicus, iustum inicus, et tamquam onus praesentiam sancti cuiusque non sustinet. contra uero ad uiri fidelis religiosi omnes, quibus dei timor est, et uel solo corporeae contemplationis uisu gratulantur modo auium herbarumque quarundam, tantum et morbis aliquibus et medentur. utilis ergo est sancti praesentia timentibus deum, quia necesse est profectum aliquem ex contemplatione ipsius consequantur. sed propheta non hoc in se solum contuendum putat, quod publicis ac promiscuis oculis subiectum est. uult ille probitatem conspici, iustitiam suam et religionem et continentiam cerni. non enim tantum timentes deum, quia uident eum, laetabuntur, sed quia uideant eum in dei uerba sperantem: et sperantem non mediocriter neque confuso humanae opinionis errore, sed dicentem cum libertate id, quod consequitur:
Then follows: "Those who fear you will see me and rejoice, because I have hoped in your words." It is the custom of the impious to be gloomy at the sight of religious men. For the drunkard must hate the sober man, the unchaste the continent, the unjust the just, and he cannot bear the presence of any holy man, as if it were a burden. But on the contrary, at the sight of a faithful and religious man all who have the fear of God rejoice even at the mere bodily sight of him, as certain birds and herbs, merely by being seen, are said to heal some diseases. So the presence of a holy man is useful to those who fear God, because they must gain some progress from beholding him. But the prophet does not think that only what is open to public and common eyes should be seen in him. He wants his uprightness to be seen, his righteousness, religion, and self-control to be perceived. For those who fear God will rejoice not only because they see him, but because they see him hoping in God's words: and hoping not moderately nor with the confused error of human opinion, but saying with freedom what follows:
118.10.11CSEL 22:445–446
Cognoui, domine, quia aequitas iudicia tua et uere me. in locis ceteris meminimus ita prophetam dicere solitum: da mihi intellectum et doce me, et tua; nunc autem tamquam de adeptis profitetur dicens: cognoui, domine, quia iudicia tua. sed hic non de iudiciis illis aeternis, sed de praesentibus sermo est. iudicia illa aeterna secundum eundem prophetam sicut abyssus multa, et secundum apostolum: iudicia dei inuestigabilia et inscrutabilia. scit autem in his iudiciis, quae nunc sunt, quidquid in se geratur, ex iudicio dei fieri: omnes tribulationes, omnes pressuras, omnia insectationum odia, omnes persecutionum infestationes ex iudicio in se dei adesse, ut per haec probabilis, ut per haec emendatus et tamquam per ignem examinatus atque purgatus sit.
"I have known, Lord, that your judgments are equity, and that in truth you have humbled me." In other places we remember that the prophet was accustomed to say thus: "Give me understanding and teach me your commandments"; but now he professes it as of things attained, saying: "I have known, Lord, that your judgments are equity." But here the discourse is not about those eternal judgments, but about present ones. Those eternal judgments, according to the same prophet, are like the great deep, and according to the apostle, "the judgments of God are untraceable and unsearchable." But he knows that in these judgments that are now, whatever is done to him is done by God's judgment: all tribulations, all pressures, all hatreds of harassment, all assaults of persecutions come upon him from God's judgment, so that through these he may be proved, through these amended, and as through fire tested and purged.
118.10.12CSEL 22:446
Plus est autem nescio quid in cognitione quam in fide operis: et idcirco hic non credidit. sed cognouit, quia fides habet meritum, non habet autem cognitae ueritatis. distinxit apostolus plurimum inter cognitionem fidemque differre. posteriore eam loco inter gratiarum dona connumerans. primum enim sapientiam, sequenti cognitionem, tertio fidem, quia qui credit, potest ignorare, cum credit; qui autem iam cognouit, non potest id, quod cognouit, adepta cognitione non credere.
But there is somehow more in knowing than in the faith of work; and therefore here he did not "believe" but "knew," because faith has merit, but not the merit of known truth. The apostle distinguished how greatly knowledge and faith differ, counting faith in a later place among the gifts of graces: first wisdom, next knowledge, third faith; because one who believes can be ignorant while he believes, but one who already knows cannot, having attained knowledge, not believe what he knows.
118.10.13CSEL 22:446
Ergo ambiguitatem hic non admittit propheta, quin sciat iusta dei esse iudicia, id est humiliationis et tribulationis et contemptus et iniuriae et doloris. ita enim ait: cognoui, domine, quia iudicia tua, et uere humiliasti me. non sine causa se scilicet esse tribulationibus subditum, non sine causa passionibus permissum, non sine causa per iniurias humiliatum, sed ad humanorum uitiorum expianda peccata ex iustis se ac ueris dei iudiciis esse subiectum.
So here the prophet admits no doubt that he knows God's judgments to be just, that is, the judgments of humiliation, tribulation, contempt, injury, and pain. For he says thus: "I have known, Lord, that your judgments are equity, and in truth you have humbled me": that is, that not without cause was he subjected to tribulations, not without cause given over to sufferings, not without cause humbled by injuries, but that he was subjected by the just and true judgments of God to expiate the sins of human vices.
118.10.14CSEL 22:446–447
Sed quia in his passionibus ex diuini iudicii uersetur, exhortationem praesentium humiliationum ex misericordia dei deprecatur, quia humana infirmitas inpar sit tolerantiae passionum: fiat misericordia tua, ut exhortetur me secundum eloquium tuum seruo tuo. sed meminit bonum sibi esse humiliari, bonum sibi esse passionibus subdi, et ea omnia, quibus uexatur, purgationem sibi terrenorum esse uitiorum. non enim ut humilitas ac tribulatio a se auferatur orat, sed ut sibi ex misericordia dei adhortatio in tribulatione praestetur. optat ergo diutino in his corporis sui infirmitatibus militare, optat certamine aduersus huius mundi nequitias consistere. sed adhortationem ex misericordia dei sperat, ut licet et adflictus adhortationis auxilio firmetur. scit et Paulus, omni ipse temptationum genere perfunctus, uti se misericordiae adhortatione. dicens: benedictus deus pater domini nostri Iesu, pater miserationum et deus omnis exhortationis, qui exhortatur nos in omni tribulatione. et adhortationem hanc scit sibi propheta promissam ab eo patre et domino miserationum, qui per temptationes eum, qui in se credat, examinet; atque ideo: secundum uerbum tuum seruo tuo, id est secundum eam promissionem, qua spoponderit se tribulatos in passionibus non relicturum. dixit enim in euangeliis: cum ergo tradent uos, nolite cogitare, quomodo aut quid loquamini: dabitur enim in illa die quid loquamini. non enim uos estis, qui loquimini, sed spiritus patris uestri, qui loquitur in uobis. et hoc quidem, quantum ad praesens pertinet tempus.
But because he is occupied in these sufferings by the divine judgment, he prays for encouragement in his present humiliations from God's mercy, because human weakness is unequal to the endurance of sufferings: "Let your mercy be, that it may encourage me, according to your word to your servant." But he remembers that it is good for him to be humbled, good for him to be subjected to sufferings, and that all the things by which he is harassed are a purging of earthly vices for him. For he does not pray that humiliation and tribulation be taken away from him, but that encouragement in tribulation be granted him by God's mercy. So he wishes to serve long as a soldier in these weaknesses of his body, he wishes to stand in the contest against the wickedness of this world. But he hopes for encouragement from God's mercy, so that even though afflicted he may be strengthened by the help of encouragement. Paul too, who had gone through every kind of temptation, knows how to use the encouragement of mercy, saying: "Blessed be God, the Father of our Lord Jesus, the Father of mercies and God of all encouragement, who encourages us in every tribulation." And the prophet knows that this encouragement is promised him by the Father and Lord of mercies, who tests through temptations the one who believes in him; and therefore he says, "according to your word to your servant," that is, according to that promise by which he pledged that he would not abandon those afflicted in sufferings. For he said in the gospels: "When they hand you over, do not think how or what you are to say; for what you are to say will be given you on that day. For it is not you who speak, but the Spirit of your Father who speaks in you." And this indeed as far as it concerns the present time.
118.10.15CSEL 22:447–448
Futurae autem spei propheta non inmemor est dicens: ueniant miserationes, et uiuam: quia lex tua meditatio mea est. naturae corporalis infirmitas eget miserationibus dei. neque enim beatae illius uitae consequi merito suo poterit, nisi miserationibus eius, qui pater miserationum est, prouehatur. scit se propheta nondum ea uiuere uita, uita sit; nemo enim nostrum, quod nunc uiuit, uitam audebit existimare. nunc enim in corpore mortis sumus. Paulo dicente: qui me liberabit de corpore mortis huius?, et hoc ipsum eodem hoc propheta testante ita: et in puluerem mortis deduxit me. uera enim uita nostra cum Christo absconsa est in deo. sed neque haec, nunc in qua agimus, regio uiuentium est: ea autem est, de qua hic idem propheta ait: et in regione uiuorum. atque ideo uiuam dixit, quia non in usu uitae istius uiuit, sed in dei sit miseratione. sed sperat istud, quia lex dei meditatio eius est. uacemus igitur diuinae lectioni, uacemus praeceptis dei et opera legis nostrae officiis exequamur: quia propter meditationem legis ueniente in se domini miseratione sperat se propheta uicturum.
But the prophet is not unmindful of the future hope, saying: "Let your mercies come to me, and I shall live; for your law is my meditation." The weakness of bodily nature needs God's mercies. For it will not be able to attain that blessed life by its own merit unless it is carried forward by the mercies of him who is the Father of mercies. The prophet knows that he does not yet live that life which is true life; for none of us will dare to think that what he now lives is life. For now we are in the body of death, as Paul says: "Who will free me from the body of this death?" and as this same prophet testifies thus: "And he has brought me down into the dust of death." For our true life is hidden with Christ in God. Nor is this, in which we now live, the land of the living; but it is that of which this same prophet says: "And in the land of the living." And therefore he said "I shall live," because he does not live in the use of this life, but in God's mercy. But he hopes for this because God's law is his meditation. Let us, then, give ourselves to divine reading, give ourselves to God's precepts, and carry out the works of our law in their duties: because through meditation on the law the prophet hopes that he will live when the Lord's mercy comes to him.
118.10.16CSEL 22:448–449
Non est uero sufficiens huic, ut sibi tantum sollicitus sit ac solum sui memor sit. oportet eum curam humani generis sumere et publicae sollicitudinis adfectum subire et orare pro his, qui in peccatis et in inreligiositate uersantur. huius itaque adfectus sui sollicitudinem consequenti uersu docet dicens: confundantur superbi, qui iniquitatem fecerunt super me. non est hic maledicti oratio. neque retributionem iniuriae sibi deprecatur. et absit, ut propheta euangelii rationem caritatis excesserit domino enim dicente: diligite inimicos uestros et orate pro calumniantibus uobis ratio non patitur, ut nunc uindictam in superbos atque iniuriosos precetur. sed quia a qui desinit, in his erubescit, et qui uitia derelinquit" necesse est ea idcirco, quia oderit, derelinquat: orat propheta,, qui in se superbi iniuste fuerint, hi per cognitionem uitiorum in his, quae gesserint, erubescant quamdiu enim quia peccat, in his, quae peccat, non confunditur consuetudine et uoluntate peccandi. ubi uero peccare destiterit, finem peccandi habet ex pudore peccati. ipse autem exercetur in mandatis dei iuste, religiose praedicando, iniurias non retribuendo et tolerando patienter. ob id enim multorum in se superborum contradictiones iniquitatesque sustinuit.
But it is not enough for this man to be anxious only for himself and mindful only of himself. He must take up care for the human race, undertake the feeling of public concern, and pray for those who live in sins and irreligion. So he teaches the anxiety of this feeling of his in the following verse, saying: "Let the proud be put to shame, who have done iniquity against me." This is not a prayer of cursing, nor does he ask for repayment of his injury. Far be it that the prophet should have gone beyond the gospel's rule of love; for since the Lord says, "Love your enemies and pray for those who slander you," reason does not allow that he should now pray for vengeance on the proud and injurious. But because one who stops sinning blushes at his sins, and one who abandons vices must abandon them because he hates them, the prophet prays that those who were proud and unjust toward him may, through recognizing their vices, blush at what they have done. For as long as one sins, he is not put to shame in what he sins, through the habit and will of sinning. But when he stops sinning, he has the end of sinning from shame at sin. He himself meanwhile is exercised justly in God's commandments, preaching devoutly, not repaying injuries and bearing them patiently. For this reason he endured the contradictions and iniquities of many proud men against him.
118.10.17CSEL 22:449
Absolute autem consequenti uersu id, quod de confusione superborum tractamus, significasse intellegitur. sequitur enim: conuertantur mihi, qui timent te cognoscunt testimonia, tua. uult ergo eos, qui deum timere coeperunt, ad se propheta conuerti, ut per doctrinam suam in uitiis suis et criminibus erubescant, cognitis scilicet testimoniis dei. de quibus multa iam diximus, et confusi in ueteribus delictis ad institutionem prophetae doctrinamque se referant: quorum ex atque peccatis ad pietatem modestiamque conuersio est.
In the following verse what we are treating about the shame of the proud is understood to have been signified plainly. For there follows: "Let those who fear you turn to me, and those who know your testimonies." So the prophet wants those who have begun to fear God to turn to him, so that through his teaching they may blush at their vices and crimes, having come to know the testimonies of God, of which we have already said much; and, put to shame in their old offenses, may turn to the prophet's instruction and teaching: whose conversion is from their former sins to piety and modesty.
118.10.18CSEL 22:449–450
Conclusit autem more dicens: fiat cor meum inmaculatum in iustificationibus tuis, ut non confundar. exercetur in mandatis, meditatur in lege, iustitiam iudiciorum dei cognouit, timentes dominum conspectu eius, manibus dei factus atque formatus est, et non audet dicere inmaculatum cor sibi esse. et audemus interdum praeferre innocentiam nostram, iactare uitiorum abstinentiam et puros nos a peccatis atque iniquitatibus gloriari? sed ut fidem ita et humilitatem ac modestiam discere a propheta nos conuenit, orante ut sibi inmaculatum cor fiat. scit enim ex eo n progredi secundum id, quod dictum est: de corde enim exeunt cogitationes, caedes,, fornicationes, furta, falsitates, blasphemiae et horum similia. hoc igitur inmaculatum fieri deprecatur, unde tot tantorumque uitiorum quasi ex quodam fomite; inmaculatum autem hoc modo sciens fieri, si in iustificatione dei maneat: iustificationum autem hunc fructum esse intellegit. ne in his manens confundatur. confusio enim ex peccatorum conscientia est et ex opprobrio delictorum. ubi ergo confusio non erit, nec peccatum erit. peccatum uero ubi non erit, in iustificationibus dei manebitur. iustificationes autem dei inmaculatum cor esse praestabunt.
He concluded in his usual manner, saying: "Let my heart be spotless in your justifications, that I may not be put to shame." He is exercised in the commandments, he meditates on the law, he has known the justice of God's judgments, those who fear the Lord rejoice at the sight of him, he was made and formed by God's hands, and yet he does not dare to say that his heart is spotless. And do we sometimes dare to put forward our innocence, to boast of abstaining from vices, and to glory that we are pure from sins and iniquities? But as we should learn faith from the prophet, so too humility and modesty, as he prays that his heart be made spotless. For he knows that from it all evils proceed, according to what is said: "For out of the heart come evil thoughts, murders, sexual immorality, thefts, falsehoods, blasphemies," and the like. So he prays that this be made spotless, from which so many and such great vices come as from a kind of tinder; knowing that it is made spotless in this way, if he remains in God's justification. And he understands this to be the fruit of the justifications, that remaining in them he is not put to shame. For shame comes from the awareness of sins and from the reproach of offenses. So where there will be no shame, there will be no sin. And where there will be no sin, one will remain in God's justifications. And God's justifications will make the heart spotless.
Tractates 118, chapter 11
118.11.1CSEL 22:450–451
humanae est, ut, cum id, quod desiderat, non potest obtinere, per desiderii iugem cupiditatem animi defectione teneatur. et hoc nosse ex ipsis adfectionis nostrae motibus promptum est, in quantam animi defectionem eorum, quos desideramus, expectatione redigamur. propheta itaque, cui omnis ad deum expectatio est, cui omne in mandatis eius desiderium est, loquitur et dicit: defecit in salutare tuum anima mea, et in uerbum tuum spero. non habet alia, desiderium suum occupent, et sancti cupiditas non uacat saeculi rebus. defecit igitur in desiderio salutaris, et defecit ob id, quia in uerbis dei credat: finis enim legis Christus Iesus est et hic est. de quo scripserunt Moyses et prophetae. est autem salutaris ipso illo nomine, quo Iesus nuncupatur. Iesus enim secundum hebraicam linguam salutaris est; et idipsum angelus ad Ioseph loquens docet, cum dicit: et uocabis nomen eius Iesum; ipse enim saluum faciet populum. causa itaque defectionis est desiderium salutaris. desiderii autem hinc origo est, quod in uerbis dei sperat. salutaris enim noster Iesus est, qui et desideratus et natus est. sed defectionem animae desiderantis intellegendum est quid sequatur.
It belongs to human nature that, when it cannot obtain what it desires, it is held by faintness of mind through the continual longing of desire. And it is easy to know this from the very movements of our feelings, into how great faintness of mind we are brought by waiting for those we long for. So the prophet, whose every expectation is toward God, whose every desire is in his commandments, speaks and says: "My soul has fainted for your salvation, and I hope in your word." He has no other things to occupy his desire, and the longing of a holy man has no room for the things of the world. So he fainted in the desire for salvation, and fainted because he believes in God's words: for the end of the law is Christ Jesus, and he it is of whom Moses and the prophets wrote. And he is salvation by the very name by which he is called Jesus. For Jesus in the Hebrew language is "salvation"; and the angel teaches this very thing speaking to Joseph, when he says: "And you shall call his name Jesus; for he will save his people." So the cause of his faintness is the desire for salvation. And the origin of the desire is this, that he hopes in God's words. For our salvation is Jesus, who was both desired and born. But we must understand what follows the faintness of the desiring soul.
118.11.2CSEL 22:451–452
Defecerunt oculi mei in eloquium: quando exhortaberis me? sequitur ergo defectionem animae defectio oculorum. sed ut de natura defectionis animae tractauimus, uideamus, qualis oculorum soleat esse defectio. pone igitur in expectatione aut peregrinantis uiri coniugem, aut iam diu absentis filii patrem, quem omni in tempore existimet reuersurum: nonne eo itinere, quo uenturum opinabitur, semper intendet? nonne intentio ac uisus oculorum contuitionis ipsius expectatione deficiet? desideria haec in se prophetarum dominus testatur, cum dicit: amen dico uobis, multi prophetae et iusti quae s'ierunt uidere, uos uidetis, et audire, quae auditis. propheta itaque et animo et oculis deficit.
"My eyes have fainted for your word: when will you encourage me?" So the faintness of the eyes follows the faintness of the soul. But as we have treated of the nature of the soul's faintness, let us see what the faintness of the eyes usually is. Picture, then, waiting, either the wife of a man who is travelling abroad, or the father of a son long absent, whom he thinks will return at any time: will he not always look intently along that road by which he thinks he will come? Will not the gaze and sight of his eyes fail in waiting for that very sight? The Lord testifies to these desires in the prophets, when he says: "Truly I say to you, many prophets and righteous men desired to see what you see, and to hear what you hear." So the prophet faints both in mind and in eyes.
118.11.3CSEL 22:452
Sed hi nunc oculi prophetae, licet dominum uidere desiderauerint, non sunt tamen corporis oculi; locuntur enim et expectant, et mentis potius est contuitio ista et loquella, non corporis. dicunt enim: quando scit exhortationem hanc sanctos quiescentes in inferno desiderare. scit testante apostolo Petro, descendente in inferna domino etiam his, qui in carcere erant et increduli quondam fuerant in diebus Noe, exhortationem praedicatam fuisse. in haec igitur dei eloquia oculis loquentibus defecit, non tam uisu corporeo dominum ex eloquiis dei nuntiatum quam contemplatione animae et mentis expectans.
But these eyes of the prophet, although they desired to see the Lord, are not the eyes of the body; for they speak and wait, and this gazing and speech belong to the mind rather than to the body. For they say: "When will you encourage me?" He knows that the saints resting in the underworld desire this encouragement. He knows, as the apostle Peter testifies, that when the Lord descended into the underworld, encouragement was preached even to those who were in prison and had once been unbelieving in the days of Noah. So for these words of God he fainted with speaking eyes, awaiting the Lord announced by God's words not so much by bodily sight as by the contemplation of soul and mind.
118.11.4CSEL 22:452–453
Dehinc sequitur; quia factus sum sicut uter in pruina, iustificationes tuas non sum oblitus. noui generis haec causa est, ut ideo iustificationes dei non sit, quia factus sit sicut uter in pruina. et si rem solis auribus metiamur, inanis et ridiculus prophetae sermo existimabitur. sed meminit utrem pro humanis corporibus nuncupari, domino in euangeliis dicente: nemo, inquit, mittit uinum nouum in utres ueteres. et non ambigitur eum in utribus corpora in peccatis suis ueterna memorasse. per autem studium frigent fidelium corpora et calore naturae interioris extincto utres erunt frigidi, quae, cum intrinsecus per naturam uitiorum ecferuentium incalescant, extrinsecus tamen patientia tamquam frigore obrigescant. ergo in hoc corporum frigore iustificationum dei inmemores esse non possumus. quisque autem per uitiorum ardorem utre pleno caluerit neque per metum dei religionemque frigescat, necesse est dei obliuiscatur. quae obliuisci sanctus non poterit, cum utris in pruina modo obrigescentis extrinsecus in internarum cupiditatum omnium instigatione sit frigidus.
Then follows: "Because I have become like a wineskin in the frost, I have not forgotten your justifications." This is a cause of a new kind, that he has not forgotten God's justifications because he has become like a wineskin in the frost. And if we measure the matter by the ears alone, the prophet's saying will be thought empty and ridiculous. But he remembers that bodies are called wineskins, as the Lord says in the gospels: "No one," he says, "puts new wine into old wineskins." And there is no doubt that by wineskins he meant bodies grown old in their sins. But through the pursuit of self-control the bodies of the faithful grow cold, and with the heat of the inner nature extinguished they will be cold wineskins, which, although they grow hot within by the nature of seething vices, yet without stiffen through patience as through frost. So in this coldness of bodies we cannot be forgetful of God's justifications. But whoever is hot with a full wineskin through the burning of vices and does not grow cold through fear of God and religion must forget God. The saint will not be able to forget these things, since, like a wineskin stiffening outwardly in the frost, he is cold against the instigation of all inward desires.
118.11.5CSEL 22:453–454
Dehinc sequitur: quot sunt dies serui tui? quando facies mihi de persequentibus me iudicium? iudicium post consummationem saeculi propheta esse non ignorat, cum ait: propterea non resurgunt impii in iudicio, neque peccatores in consilio iustorum. quod ergo nunc orat persequentium se fieri iudicium? non illud utique, quod in resurrectionis saeculo meminit futurum, se paucorum nunc dierum secundum corporalem uitam sciat esse. ita enim ait: quot sunt dies serui tui? cum dicit quot, scit esse non plures. et superius dixerat esse se tamquam utrem in pruina. ergo quia paucorum dierum sit, fieri iudicium ab his, qui se persecuntur, desiderat, a diabolo scilicet ministrisque eius. sunt enim spiritales in caelestibus. sed et diabolum in resurrectionis saeculo iudicandum. paucorum itaque dierum ipse cum sit, fieri hoc iudicium desiderat, scilicet ut consummate sanctus et perfecte domino placens conterat intra se diabolum, conterat aduersantes sibi inimicasque uirtutes et fidei suae, subdat nequitias spiritales. nondum igitur de naturae suae firmitate confidit, licet iam ut uter frigeat, sed, ut per misericordiam dei iudicium in inimicos suos sit,. hanc potestatem iudicii dominus apostolis suis dedit dicens: ecce dedi uobis potestatem calcare super serpentes et scorpiones et super omnem uirtutem inimici. uocem hanc quidem nondum propheta domini in corpore manentis audiuit; sed dari sibi id potestatis orat, ut constituatur sibi in persequentes se tale iudicium. temptatur enim undique. cum ei per naturam corporis uitiorum inest connata materies eamque diabolus conatur ardore cupiditatis accendere, cum impiis inreligiosorum uocibus, cum profanas gentium contra deum disputationes et eloquia uesana perpetitur.
Then follows: "How many are the days of your servant? When will you execute judgment for me on those who persecute me?" The prophet is not unaware that the judgment is after the end of the age, since he says: "Therefore the impious do not rise in the judgment, nor sinners in the council of the righteous." Why then does he now pray for judgment to be made on his persecutors? Certainly not that judgment which he remembers is to come in the age of the resurrection, since he knows that he now has few days in bodily life. For he says thus: "How many are the days of your servant?" When he says "how many," he knows they are not many. And above he had said that he was like a wineskin in the frost. So because he is of few days, he desires judgment to be made on those who persecute him, that is, on the devil and his ministers. For they are spiritual beings in the heavenly places. But the devil too is to be judged in the age of the resurrection. So since he himself is of few days, he desires this judgment to be made, namely that, being completely holy and perfectly pleasing to the Lord, he may crush the devil within himself, crush the powers that oppose him and are hostile to his faith, and subdue the spiritual wickednesses. So he does not yet trust in the firmness of his nature, though he is already cold like a wineskin, but prays that by God's mercy there may be judgment on his enemies. The Lord gave this power of judgment to his apostles, saying: "Behold, I have given you power to tread on serpents and scorpions and over all the power of the enemy." The prophet had not yet heard this voice of the Lord abiding in the body; but he prays that this power be given him, that such a judgment be established for him against his persecutors. For he is tempted on every side: since the material of vices is inborn in him through the nature of the body and the devil tries to kindle it with the heat of desire, and since he suffers the impious voices of the irreligious, and the profane disputations and mad speeches of the nations against God.
118.11.6CSEL 22:454
Ideo in consequenti ait: narrauerunt mihi iniqui exercitationes, sed non ita, ut lex tua. quanti enim sunt, qui quaedam humanae uitae instituta docere se adserant, cum ad uirtutes saeculi studia animae nostrae deo rectius seruientia accendunt! quanti etiam sunt, qui cognitionem se habere diuinarum scripturarum mentientes et peruersa dogmata praedicant! sed sciens propheta perfectam humanae doctrinae eruditionem in dei lege esse, ait: narrauerunt mihi iniqui exercitationes, sed non ita, ut lex tua. iniqui enim sunt haec praedicantes. et dei uox uetuit peccatorem eloquia sancta narrare, quia iniquitas doctrinae non recipit ueritatem. peccatori enim dixit deus: quare tu enarras iustitias meas et adsumes testamentum meum per os tuum? tu autem odisti disciplinam, reiecisti sermones meos retro. et has igitur exercitationes propheta non fert, sciens nihil narrationi legis aequandum.
Therefore in what follows he says: "The wicked told me of exercises, but not as your law." For how many there are who claim to teach certain rules of human life, while they kindle toward the virtues of the world the efforts of our soul that would more rightly serve God! How many too there are who, lying that they have knowledge of the divine Scriptures, preach perverse doctrines! But the prophet, knowing that the perfect learning of human teaching lies in God's law, says: "The wicked told me of exercises, but not as your law." For those who preach these things are wicked. And God's voice forbade the sinner to tell the holy words, because the iniquity of a teaching does not admit the truth. For God said to the sinner: "Why do you declare my righteous acts and take my covenant in your mouth? But you have hated discipline and cast my words behind you." So the prophet does not bear these exercises, knowing that nothing is to be compared to the telling of the law.
118.11.7CSEL 22:454–455
Denique adiecit: omnia iudicia tua ueritas: inique persecuti sunt me, adiuua me. iustum qui persequitur, necesse est ut inique persequatur, quia iniquitas iniustae operationis effectus est. scit et hanc apostolus persecutionum iniquitatem, cum dicit: omnes uolentes religiose uiuere in Christo persecutionem patientur. - enim tribulationes iustorum sunt. nunc satanas insectatur, nunc ministeria eius inpugnant, nunc falsorum fratrum simulatio ad nocendum arte insectationis inrepit. sed propheta, qui esse mandata dei meminerit, iniustae iniquitatis persecutionem fideli animo sustinet. et quia persecutionem sciat fidei esse docimentum, non orat eam a se amoueri; sed adiuuari se in ea postulat, et opem atque auxilium dei precatur euangelici huius non ignarus: qui non accepit suam et sequitur me, non est me dignus.
Then he added: "All your judgments are truth; the wicked have persecuted me; help me." Whoever persecutes the just must persecute wickedly, because wickedness is the effect of unjust action. The apostle too knows this wickedness of persecutions, when he says: "All who wish to live devoutly in Christ will suffer persecution." For many are the tribulations of the righteous. Now Satan harasses, now his ministers attack, now the pretense of false brothers creeps in to do harm by the art of harassment. But the prophet, who remembers that God's commandments are truth, bears the persecution of unjust wickedness with a faithful mind. And because he knows that persecution is the proof of faith, he does not pray for it to be removed from him; but he asks to be helped in it, and he prays for the aid and help of God, not ignorant of this gospel saying: "Whoever does not take up his cross and follow me is not worthy of me."
118.11.8CSEL 22:455
Veritas ergo est in praeceptis dei. ueritas nihil falsum, nihil incertum, nihil inperfectum habet. persecutio autem iusto intentata iniqua est. iniquitas enim necesse est oderit ueritatis; sed auxilium a deo est ueritatis. graues enim meminit has esse persecutorum molestias, sed quia iusto utiles sint, non putat amouendas. periculosa namque fidei pax est, et faciles securis excubiis sunt. bellis autem exercitatum uirum non cito doli capient: et glorioso certamine opus est, ut corona deferatur. ob quod non orat adimi sibi causam certandi, sed tribui auxilium uincendi.
Truth, then, is in God's precepts. Truth has nothing false, nothing uncertain, nothing imperfect. But persecution directed at the just is wicked. For wickedness must hate truth; but help for truth comes from God. He remembers that these troubles from persecutors are heavy, but because they are useful to the just, he does not think they should be removed. For peace is dangerous for faith, and those on careless watch are easy prey. But a man exercised in wars is not soon caught by tricks; and there is need of a glorious contest for a crown to be awarded. For this reason he does not pray for the cause of the contest to be taken from him, but for help to conquer to be granted.
118.11.9CSEL 22:455–456
Meminit autem non in leui se temptationum esse pugna. sequitur enim: paulo minus me in terra: ego autem non dereliqui mandata tua. prope usque ad finem fidei iniustae persecutiones prophetam redegerunt, illae scilicet, de quibus superius diximus, spiritales in caelestibus, nos ad corporalia uitia ingestis cupiditatum inlecebris instigant. igitur est propheta consummatus in terra, id est in corporum uitia et peccata deiectus. ut enim consummatio bonorum ita et malorum est. sed ingruentibus licet his perniciosissimis inimicis ac persequentibus se mandata dei non dereliquit; et infirmata licet naturae suae inbecillitate in praeceptis dei permanet, hoc gloriosius in mandatis dei permanens, quo naturae infirmitas sit.
He remembers that he is in no light battle of temptations. For there follows: "They almost finished me on the earth; but I did not forsake your commandments." Unjust persecutions brought the prophet almost to the end of his faith, namely those we mentioned above, the spiritual powers in the heavenly places, which urge us to bodily vices by the enticements of desires they thrust upon us. So the prophet was almost finished on the earth, that is, cast down into the vices and sins of bodies. For as there is a finishing of good things, so also of evil. But though these most destructive enemies and persecutors assailed him, he did not forsake God's commandments; and though weakened by the frailty of his nature, he remains in God's precepts, remaining in God's commandments all the more gloriously as the weakness of his nature is greater.
118.11.10CSEL 22:456
Concludit deinde modestiae et spei suae more dicens: secundum miserationem tuam uiuifica me, et custodiam testimonia oris tui. uiuificari se tamquam nondum uiuens precatur et custoditurum se testimonia oris dei, tamquam nunc non custodiat, pollicetur. sed cum uiuit in corpore, uitam ille non huius saeculi; et cum testimonia dei in lege custodiat, tamen testimonia oris dei custoditurum se pollicetur, euangelicis innouata praeceptis non adulterio tantum, sed etiam desiderio adulterii abstinentes sola fidei sanctificatione consummant: per dominum nostrum Iesum Christum, qui et os et dextera et uirtus et sapientia dei est, benedictus in saecula saeculorum. amen.
Then he concludes in his manner of modesty and hope, saying: "According to your mercy give me life, and I will keep the testimonies of your mouth." He prays to be given life as one not yet living, and he promises to keep the testimonies of God's mouth as though he does not keep them now. But though he lives in the body, he looks for the life not of this age; and though he keeps God's testimonies in the law, yet he promises to keep the testimonies of God's mouth, which, renewed by the gospel precepts, make complete by the sanctification of faith alone those who abstain not only from adultery but also from the desire for adultery: through our Lord Jesus Christ, who is the mouth and right hand and power and wisdom of God, blessed for ever and ever. Amen.
Tractates 118, chapter 12
118.12.1CSEL 22:456–457
Sermonem prophetae in humilibus ac peruulgatis demorari decet. sed semper excelsa et deo digna tractare, atque ita, ut, dum nos ad innocentis obseruantiam imbuit, ingenii quoque nostri humilitatem ad intellegentiam diuinorum et inuisibilium sacramentorum extollat. nec sane humana infirmitas in caelestem scientiam se ipsa proueheret, nisi deo donum scientiae per doctrinam spiritus largiente ad cognitionem et inperspicabilis naturae erudiretur. uolens igitur propheta praestare nos ac perficere deo dignos et sciens repositum humanae spei esse, ut in caelestem gloriam, si disciplinam, accederet, ita coepit: in saeculum, domine, permanet uerbum tuum in caelo.
It does not befit the prophet's discourse to linger on lowly and common things, but always to treat lofty things worthy of God, and in such a way that, while it trains us in the observance of innocence, it also raises the lowliness of our mind to the understanding of divine and invisible mysteries. Nor indeed would human weakness carry itself into heavenly knowledge unless, God granting the gift of knowledge through the teaching of the Spirit, it were trained to the knowledge even of an inscrutable nature. So the prophet, wishing to make us excellent and complete and worthy of God, and knowing that it is laid up for human hope that it should come into heavenly glory if it kept discipline, began thus: "For ever, Lord, your word abides in heaven."
118.12.2CSEL 22:457
In ait, quia scit in terris propter falsitatem - Dum non manere. et quomodo in caelo maneat, ipsa ueluti contemplationis fide cernitur. non est illic transgressio, non demutatio, non infirmitas, non otium. contueamur solis annuum cursum et menstruum lunae recursum, astrorum quoque aut stationes aut conuersiones aut demutationes: numquid non finibus suis et constitutis terminis ac decretis uicissitudinibus continentur? nihil illic demutatur, nihil differtur, nihil neglegitur: sed in constitutionis manet lege et in indefessis ministeriis perseuerat.
He says "in heaven" because he knows that on earth, because of falsehood, it does not abide. And how it abides in heaven is seen by the very faith of contemplation, as it were. There is no transgression there, no change, no weakness, no idleness. Let us look at the yearly course of the sun and the monthly return of the moon, and the stations or turnings or changes of the stars: are they not held within their bounds and fixed limits and decreed alternations? Nothing there is changed, nothing put off, nothing neglected; but it remains in the law of its establishment and perseveres in unwearying service.
118.12.3CSEL 22:457–458
Sed seruauit hanc desinendorum et officiorum propheta rationem dicens: in um, domine, permanet uerbum tuum in caelo. Latini quidam interpretes ambigua id significatione et minus propria transtulerunt. nam quod apud illos est:;, XVQVE, id nobiscum aeternum, domine translatum. accipi autem ita potest, ut intellegatur nullo id, quod aeternum est, fine desinere. saeculum uero, quod graece est, intra spatium definiti temporis continetur. non enim ait: in neque in, sed in saeculum uerbum tuum permanet. scit post hoc saeculum caelum et terram praeterire domino dicente: amen dico uobis, et terra praeteriet, uerba autem mea non praeteribunt. meminit etiam hoc saeculum praeteriturum esse, ut sit caelum nouum et terra noua. idcirco ait: in, domine, permanet uerbum tuum in: quia post hoc saeculum transeunte caelo uerbum hoc constitutae in creaturis, reuelationem filiorum dei expectent, non necesse sit permanere.
But the prophet kept this distinction of things that will end and of offices, saying: "For ever, Lord, your word abides in heaven." Certain Latin translators rendered this with an ambiguous and less proper meaning. For what with them is εἰς τὸν αἰῶνα was translated among us "eternal, Lord." It can be taken so as to mean that what is eternal ends with no end. But saeculum, which is αἰών in Greek, is contained within the space of a defined time. For he does not say "into eternity" nor "for ever and ever," but "for the age your word abides." He knows that after this age heaven and earth pass away, as the Lord says: "Truly I say to you, heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will not pass away." He remembers too that this age will pass away, so that there may be a new heaven and a new earth. Therefore he says: "For the age, Lord, your word abides in heaven": because after this age, when heaven passes away, it will not be necessary for this word established in the creatures, which await the revelation of the sons of God, to abide.
118.12.4CSEL 22:458–459
Sed non idcirco non et in terris aliquando dei uerbum est, licet id tantum in propheta praedicet manere. nemo enim nostrum est, qui non interdum donum spiritalis gratiae sentiat, qui non aliquando in se habeat dei uerbum, cum sobrius, cum tranquillus est, cum continens est, cum beniuolus est, cum misericors est: in his enim cum sumus, manet in nobis dei uerbum, cum praeceptis eius bonarum rerum famulamur. sed subrepentibus turbidarum adfectionum motibus, cum subit pecuniae cura, cum aestus turpis ac cupiditatis accenditur, cum impetus commouetur, cum ebrietas desideratur, iam non est in nobis manens dei uerbum. est autem in his, qui secundum apostolum exuti uetere homine cum peccatis suis nouum induunt, qui commortui Christo et consepulti iam in nouitatem resurrexerunt et collocati sunt in caelestibus, qui terrestris imagine derelicta caelestis imaginem portant, in his enim tamquam in caelo uerbum dei permanet, in quibus hoc uerbum non offenditur ira, ebrietate, odio, infidelitate, lasciuiis. nam etsi aliquando manet, tamen has cohabitationis suae contumelias non fert, ut semper inesse permaneat. si commemorata uitia semper in nobis erunt, ne quidem polluta corporum domicilia dignabitur.
But it is not for that reason that the word of God is never on earth, although the prophet declares only that it abides in heaven. For there is none of us who does not sometimes feel the gift of spiritual grace, who does not at some time have God's word in him, when he is sober, when calm, when continent, when kindly, when merciful: for when we are in these things, God's word abides in us, while we serve his precepts of good things. But when the movements of troubled feelings creep in, when care for money comes on, when the heat of shameful desire is kindled, when anger is stirred, when drunkenness is longed for, God's word no longer abides in us. But it is in those who, according to the apostle, having put off the old man with his sins, put on the new, who, having died with Christ and been buried with him, have already risen into newness and been seated in the heavenly places, who, having left the image of the earthly, bear the image of the heavenly: in these, as in heaven, God's word abides, in whom this word is not offended by anger, drunkenness, hatred, unbelief, lusts. For even if it sometimes abides, it does not bear these insults to its dwelling so as to remain always within. If the vices mentioned are always in us, it will not even deign to visit the polluted dwellings of our bodies.
118.12.5CSEL 22:459
Adest autem unicuique proximum, ut dictum est: stat enim ad ostium uerbum dei et pulsat ostium animae nostrae et dicit: ecce stans ante ostium pulso; si quis aperiet mihi ostium, ingrediar ad eum. uult ergo semper introire; sed a nobis. ne introeat, excluditur. enim per haec corporis uitia animae nostrae aditum. quae si coeperit emundatis omnibus patere, ilico introibit modo solis, qui clausis fenestrae ualuis introire prohibetur, patentibus uero totus inmittitur. ipsi quidem semper, ut inluminet, promptum est, sed lumen sibi domus ipsa obseratis aditibus excludit. est enim uerbum dei sol iustitiae adsistens unicuique, ut introeat, nec moratur lucem suam repertis aditibus infundere. manet igitur hoc uerbum dei in caelis per indefessam caelestium. quo exemplo in sanctis quoque, qui caelestes secundum imaginem sunt, dei uerbum manere credendum est.
But it is near to each one, as it is said: for the word of God stands at the door and knocks at the door of our soul and says: "Behold, standing before the door I knock; if anyone opens the door to me, I will come in to him." So it always wants to come in; but it is shut out by us so that it does not come in. For through these vices of the body we close the entrance of our soul. If the soul begins to open, all things being cleansed, at once it will come in, like the sun, which is kept from coming in when the shutters of the window are closed, but is let in wholly when they are open. It is always ready to give light, but the house itself shuts out the light by barring its entrances. For the word of God is the sun of righteousness standing by each one to come in, and it does not delay to pour in its light when it finds an entrance. So this word of God abides in the heavens through the unwearying obedience of heavenly things. By this example we must believe that God's word abides also in the saints, who are heavenly according to the image.
118.12.6CSEL 22:459–460
: ueritas tua. duplicem hanc sensus nostri intellegentiam, qua uerbum dei manere ut in caelo ita et in sanctis hominibus existimamus, uersus hic, qui consequitur, confirmat. non enim ait: in generationem generationis aut a generationibus generationum, sed in generationem et generationem ueritas tua. utramque generationem simplici significatione conmemorat. duas igitur generationes in duobus populis, quorum unus est legis et prophetarum, alius est euangeliorum et apostolorum. ueritas ergo dei in solis his duabus generationibus manet. sed cum prior generatio ueritatem dei intra se haberet, nulla alia tum habuit. erant enim plures generationes gentium atque populorum. et nunc cum haec eadem generatio indigna exstitit, in qua ueritas dei esset, hanc eandem dei ueritatem praeter eam, euangeliis credidit, non habet alia ulla generatio.
"Your truth is to generation and generation." This verse that follows confirms the twofold understanding of our sense, by which we think that God's word abides both in heaven and in holy men. For he does not say "to generation of generation" or "from generations of generations," but "to generation and generation is your truth." He mentions each generation in a simple meaning. So there are two generations in two peoples, of which one is of the law and the prophets, the other of the gospels and the apostles. God's truth, then, abides in these two generations alone. But when the former generation had God's truth within it, no other had it then. For there were many generations of nations and peoples. And now, since this same generation proved unworthy to have God's truth in it, no other generation has this same truth of God besides the one that believed the gospels.
118.12.7CSEL 22:460–461
Sequitur uero: fundasti terram, et permanebit. conuenerat ordini, ut post caelum dehinc terra nuncuparetur: sed hoc, quod medium est, id est in generationem et generationem ueritas tua, ob eam causam interuenisse existimo. ut duplex illa de caelo, in quo uerbum dei manet. intellegentia confirmaretur. nunc ergo tamquam integer ordo seruatus est. cum post caelum, in quo permanet dei uerbum. fundata terra mansura est. et quidem hoc etiam de hac terra forte dictum intellegetur, quae fundata permanet, quam secundum Salomonem deus per sapientiam fundauit., cum sit aquarum naturae superiecta et inconstanti innatet substrata elemento, ita tamen sapientia et uirtute et spiritu dei fundata fuerit, ut permaneat. sed mihi propheticus sermo etiam de terra humani corporis uidetur locutus, ita fundata sit, ut. in ea tamquam in uerbum dei maneat. caelum enim praeteribit: et quomodo haec terra fundata mansura est? nisi forte fundata in hoc saeculo tantum mansura sit, id est secundum saeculi huius constitutionem et ipsa mansura. sed si permansura est, quo uerbo significatur in perpetuum mansura, earum necesse est generationum terra fundata et mansura esse credenda est, quibus ob ueritatem in his dei manentem caelestis horum nunc terrenorum corporum gloria praeparatur. et absolutius id ita consequenti uersu poterit intellegi.
Then follows: "You founded the earth, and it will abide." It would have suited the order for the earth to be named next after heaven; but I think this middle part, namely "your truth is to generation and generation," came between for this reason, that the twofold understanding of heaven, in which God's word abides, might be confirmed. Now, then, the order is kept as though unbroken, since after heaven, in which the word of God abides, the earth that was founded will abide. And indeed this may perhaps be understood as said also of this earth, which, founded, abides, which according to Solomon God founded by wisdom: since, though it is laid over the nature of the waters and floats on an unstable element spread beneath it, yet it was so founded by the wisdom, power, and Spirit of God that it abides. But to me the prophetic word seems also to have spoken of the earth of the human body, which was so founded that the word of God may abide in it as in heaven. For heaven will pass away; and how will this earth, once founded, abide? Unless perhaps, founded in this age, it is to abide only in it, that is, abide according to the constitution of this age. But if it is to abide, by which word it is meant to abide for ever, it must be believed that the earth founded and abiding is that of those generations for whom, because of God's truth abiding in them, the heavenly glory of these now earthly bodies is being prepared. And this can be understood more fully from the following verse.
118.12.8CSEL 22:461–462
Ait enim: ordinatione tua perseuerat dies, quoniam omnia seruiunt tibi. dies iste, qui nunc est, non perseuerat, interuentu noctis exemptus. aut si de huius diei temporibus locutus esset, mentionem etiam noctis fieri conuenerat, quae pari, ut dies, dei ordinatione persistit. sed quia dies lux est et sanctus quisque mundi istius lumen est, huius ergo luminis dies non ambigue ordinatione dei perseuerare creditur et perseueraturus, quia omnia deo seruiant. nunc enim non omnia deo seruiunt. numquid et peccatores deo? numquid et hi seruiunt, qui adhuc scabello domini pedum subdendi sunt? dixit enim Dauid: dixit dominus domino meo: sede a dextris meis, donec ponam inimicos tuos scamillum pedum tuorum. et secundum apostolum: oportet eum regnare, donec ponat inimicos suos sub pedibus eius. ergo tunc dies, id est sanctorum lumen permanebit, cum deo uniuersa seruire.
For he says: "By your ordinance the day continues, for all things serve you." This day which now is does not continue, being taken away by the coming of night. Or if he had spoken of the times of this day, it would have been fitting to mention the night too, which persists by God's ordinance just as the day does. But because day is light, and every holy man is the light of this world, the day of this light is believed without doubt to continue by God's ordinance and to be going to continue, because all things serve God. For now not all things serve God. Do sinners too serve God? Do those also serve who are still to be put under the footstool of the Lord's feet? For David said: "The Lord said to my Lord: Sit at my right hand, until I make your enemies the footstool of your feet." And according to the apostle: "He must reign until he puts his enemies under his feet." So the day, that is, the light of the saints, will then abide, when all things serve God.
118.12.9CSEL 22:462
Et haec quidem a nobis secundum propheticam atque apostolicam doctrinam conmemorata sunt, ut, quamquam in praesentibus dictis futurorum bonorum significari tempus intellegatur, in quo et caelum nouum et terra noua et demutandorum corporum gloria et abolitis terrenorum uitiorum noctibus nostri luminis dies spei et expectationi nostrae, tamen et magnificentiam dei omnes huius quoque mundi creationes indemutabili officiorum suorum constitutione testentur, cum ita firmata, fundata statutaque omnia sint, ut perpetuis, quibus manebunt, constitutorum ab exordio temporum cursibus perseuerent.
And these things we have recalled according to the prophetic and apostolic teaching, so that, although in the present sayings the time of future goods is understood to be signified, in which there will be both a new heaven and a new earth and the glory of bodies to be changed, and, when the nights of earthly vices are abolished, the day of our light will answer to our hope and expectation; yet all the creations of this world too may testify to the magnificence of God by the unchangeable order of their offices, since all things are so established, founded, and set that they persevere in the perpetual courses, in which they will remain, of the times appointed from the beginning.
118.12.10CSEL 22:462–463
Sed propheta perseuerare se ut diem postulat seque iam seruum esse domini sui meminit dicens: nisi quod lex tua meditatio mea est, tunc forte perissem in humiliatione mea. frequenter admonuimus humiliationem id significari, cum temptationibus anima subiecta est et infirmitati derelicta humilis efficitur. lex ergo ei meditatio est: et nisi ei meditatio fuisset, forsitan in humiliatione perisset. non est ergo meditatio legis dei, cum tribulamur et. relinquenda, sed cum uariis corporum infirmitatibus, cum inter persecutionum bella uexamur, constans in nobis debet legis esse meditatio. urant enim licet in excidium fidei ignes. lacerent quoque ad periculum salutis nostrae flagella, etiam ad eliciendam impietatis confessionem redempta a deo corpora, dicti tamen prophetici meminisse debemus, ut consortes ipsius simus. dicamus et nos patientes atque uincentes: nisi quod lex tua meditatio mea est, tunc forsitan perissem in humilitate mea. et beatitudinem meditationis huius iam in exordio psalmorum propheta meminit dicens: beatus uir, qui non abiit in consilio impiorum et in uia peccatorum non stetit et in cathedra pestilentiae non sedit. sed in lege domini fuit uoluntas eius, et in lege eius meditabitur die et nocte. et uere beatus erit, quisquis in lege dei meditabitur, qua meditatione in ipsa quoque tribulationum humiliatione seruabitur.
But the prophet asks to continue like the day, and remembers that he is now the servant of his Lord, saying: "Unless your law had been my meditation, I would perhaps have perished in my humiliation." We have often noted that humiliation means this: when the soul is subjected to temptations and, left to its weakness, is made lowly. So the law is his meditation; and had it not been his meditation, he might perhaps have perished in humiliation. So meditation on God's law is not to be abandoned when we are afflicted; but when we are harassed by various weaknesses of body and amid the wars of persecutions, the meditation on the law must be constant in us. Though fires burn for the destruction of faith, though scourges tear, to the peril of our safety, bodies redeemed by God, even to extract a confession of impiety, we must still remember the prophetic saying, so as to be his companions. Let us too, enduring and conquering, say: "Unless your law had been my meditation, I would perhaps have perished in my humiliation." And the prophet recalled the blessedness of this meditation already at the beginning of the Psalms, saying: "Blessed is the man who has not walked in the counsel of the impious, nor stood in the way of sinners, nor sat in the seat of pestilence; but his will was in the law of the Lord, and on his law he will meditate day and night." And truly blessed will be whoever meditates on God's law, by which meditation he will be preserved even in the humiliation of tribulations.
118.12.11CSEL 22:463
Dehinc sequitur: in saeculum non obliuiscar iustificationum tuarum, quia in ipsis uiuificasti me. scit propheta secundum apostolum finem legis esse Christum, in qua iustificationum obseruatio constituta est, scit et in credituris legem esse, scit et iustum ei fide uiuere, scit et legem spiritalem esse, scit, quod qui ea, quae in lege sunt, fecerit, - uiuet, et idcirco ait: in um non obliuiscar tuarum; quia in ipsis uiuificasti me: ut, quamquam fides euangelica finitis legis sit operibus praedicanda, iustificationum legis tamen. quae sibi initium sit, inmemor non sit, quia legis iustificatio iustificationis fideique sit.
Then follows: "For ever I will not forget your justifications, because in them you have given me life." The prophet knows, according to the apostle, that Christ is the end of the law, in which the observance of the justifications was established; he knows too that the law is for those who will believe, he knows that the righteous man lives by faith, he knows that the law is spiritual, he knows that whoever does the things that are in the law will live by them; and therefore he says: "For ever I will not forget your justifications, because in them you have given me life": so that, although the gospel faith is to be preached when the works of the law are finished, yet he may not be unmindful of the justifications of the law, which were a beginning for him, because the justification of the law is the beginning of justification and of faith.
118.12.12CSEL 22:463–464
Constanter uero, cum sibi nulla iustificationum dei subrepere possit obliuio, id, quod consequitur, est professus dicens: tuus sum ego, salua me: quia iustificationes tuas exquisiui. non omnibus uox professionis istius conpetit, et rarus quisque est, qui se dei audeat dicere. audebit sane ille, qui dixit: mihi uiuere Christus est, et mori lucrum et: uiuo iam non ego, uiuit autem in me Christus. et qui huius fidei erunt similes, non inpudenter, quod dei sint, confitebuntur. uox ista est animae deo semper intentae; opus istud est. inmobilis, ieiunii, largitionis. quomodo enim se dei esse profitebitur in libidinem calens, in iram mobilis, in auaritiam sollicitus, in ebrietatem sitiens, in gloriam saeculi inanis? horum potius erit iste, non dei. in quo enim haec passionum uitia abundabunt, quomodo non eorum erit, quibus seruiet? plures gentium dii: sed unus Paulo deus, ex quo omnia, et unus dominus noster Iesus, per quem omnia. constanter ergo propheta, cui soli seruit, quod suus sit, confitetur: et quia suus sit, ut saluetur, orat. suus autem per id est, quia iustificationes eius exquirat. aliis quaerentibus gloriam mundi, aliis agros, domos, pecuniam, ille iustitias dei exquirit et, quod dei sit, gloriatur.
Steadfastly, since no forgetfulness of God's justifications can creep upon him, he professed what follows, saying: "I am yours; save me, because I have sought out your justifications." The voice of this profession does not suit everyone, and rare is the one who dares to call himself God's. He will certainly dare who said, "For me to live is Christ, and to die is gain," and, "I live, no longer I, but Christ lives in me." And those who are like this faith will not shamelessly confess that they are God's. This voice belongs to a soul always intent on God; this is the work of one unmoved, of fasting, of almsgiving. For how will one profess that he is God's who burns with lust, is quick to anger, anxious for gain, thirsty for drunkenness, empty in pursuit of worldly glory? He will rather belong to these, not to God. For in whom these vices of passion abound, how will he not belong to those whom he serves? Many are the gods of the nations; but for Paul there is one God, from whom are all things, and one Lord, our Jesus, through whom are all things. So the prophet steadfastly confesses that he belongs to him whom alone he serves; and because he is his, he prays to be saved. And he is his because he seeks out his justifications. While others seek the glory of the world, others fields, houses, money, he seeks out God's righteous acts and glories that he is God's.
118.12.13CSEL 22:464–465
Est autem in istiusmodi pios ac religiosos uiros ingens odium inreligiosorum. et scit propheta, uel saeculi hominibus uel diabolo et ministris eius eum, qui se dei profitetur, esse. hoc etiam consequenti uersu docet, quo ait: me exspectauerunt peccatores, ut perderent: intellexi. diabolo uel ministris eius pugna est, omnem gloriam uiri fidelis auferre et eum non ex portione dei sinere esse, sed in damnationis suae consortium adsumere. longo itaque ac diutino proelio contra fidem prophetae dimicatur. sed memor ille mandatorum dei et testimonia eius intellegens restitit atque permansit. neque aliter spem eorum, qui perditionem suam expectabant, elusit, quam quod sibi in testimoniis dei intellexit esse doctrinam. arduum autem atque difficile est intellegere dei testimonia, et ultra praesentis cognitionis scientiam eorum intellegentia procedit. de testimoniis uero iam in psalmi exordio tractauimus. per haec enim praesentia legis testimonia testimoniorum aeternorum cognitio praestatur. denique id ipsum consequens sermo demonstrat.
But there is great hatred of the irreligious toward such pious and religious men. And the prophet knows that whoever professes himself God's is hateful either to men of the world or to the devil and his ministers. He teaches this too in the following verse, in which he says: "Sinners waited for me to destroy me; I have understood your testimonies." The devil's or his ministers' fight is to take away all the glory of the faithful man and not to let him remain in God's portion, but to take him into the fellowship of their own damnation. So a long and lasting battle is fought against the prophet's faith. But he, mindful of God's commandments and understanding his testimonies, resisted and persevered. And he frustrated the hope of those who waited for his destruction in no other way than by understanding that his teaching lay in God's testimonies. But it is hard and difficult to understand God's testimonies, and the understanding of them goes beyond the knowledge of present learning. We already treated of testimonies at the beginning of the psalm. For through these present testimonies of the law the knowledge of the eternal testimonies is granted. And the following verse shows this very thing.
118.12.14CSEL 22:465–466
: omni consummationi uidi finem. frequenter admonuimus, non posse satisfactionem ex latinitatis translatione praestari. alia enim uis dicti huius est ex graeco enuntiati; ita enim est:. id, quod cum Graecis nuncupatur, ultra finem est rerum statutarum neque aliquo, ut desinat, continetur, sed omnem limitem sub indefinita significatione transcendit. quod autem nobiscum scribitur in, fine eo, qui significatur, existimatur id, unde agitur, contineri. sed propheta, qui non corporalia neque terrena testimonia legis intellegit, secundum graecam significantiam ultra omnem consummationem contuetur. scit consummationem esse temporum legis, cum post plenitudinem temporum deus in corpore contuendus sit: sed ultra hanc consummationem uidet; uidet etenim spei tempus. sed et huius quidem consummatio non ignorata ei est; ultra id enim oculos extendit. namque et resurrectionis consummationem uidet; scit uero et demutationis esse ordinem constitutum apostolo dicente: unusquisque autem in suo ordine, et rursum: omnes quidem resurgent, sed non omnes commutabuntur. nouit et dies regni domini nostri Iesu Christi, quo in regnum dei patris prouehemur et in illa inexquisita et dei iudicia transferemur. scit et tempus esse iudicii. et hoc scire ei ex amplitudine mandatorum dei licuit, quia se in cognitionis doctrinam diuinus sermo diffuderit.
"Of all consummation I have seen the end." We have often noted that satisfaction cannot be given from the Latin translation. For the force of this saying as expressed in Greek is different; for it is thus: πάσης συντελείας εἶδον πέρας. What is named among the Greeks is beyond the end of appointed things and is not held by anything so as to cease, but goes beyond every limit with an unbounded meaning. But what is written among us as "end" is thought to be contained within the end that is meant. But the prophet, who does not understand the testimonies of the law as bodily or earthly, looks beyond every consummation, according to the Greek meaning. He knows that there is a consummation of the times of the law, when after the fullness of times God was to be seen in a body; but he sees beyond this consummation; for he sees the time of hope. And the consummation of this too is not unknown to him; for he stretches his eyes beyond it. For he also sees the consummation of the resurrection; and he knows that there is an order of change appointed, as the apostle says: "But each in his own order," and again: "All indeed will rise, but not all will be changed." He knows too the days of the kingdom of our Lord Jesus Christ, when we shall be carried into the kingdom of God the Father and transferred into those unsearchable judgments of God. He knows too that there is a time of judgment. And it was granted him to know this from the breadth of God's commandments, because the divine word has spread itself into the teaching of knowledge.
118.12.15CSEL 22:466–467
Ait enim: latum mandatum tuum uehementer. latum plane est, siue quod in infinitum cognitionem humanae ignorantiae extendit, quod multa sunt, in quibus dei praeceptis obtemperetur atque placeatur secundum diuisiones et munera gratiarum. non enim ab omnibus omnia exspectantur. neque uniuersi uniuersa ad summam placendi inplere possunt. alius ieiunio placet, alius simplicitate fidei promeretur, alius uitia eleemosynis redimit, alius se caritate consummat; sicut alii curationum concessa uirtus est, alii prophetiae scientia contributa est, alii fidei firmitas data est, alii sapientia et cognitio donata est. latum igitur mandatum dei est et in omnia spei nostrae genera diffunditur, ut non difficile sit, si uoluntas adsit. praecepto dei obtemperare, cum latum et diffusum sit ad placendum religionis uarietate. neque solum latum. sed uehementer latum: latitudinis infinitate hac ipsa superadiectione monstrata. amen.
For he says: "Your commandment is exceedingly broad." It is plainly broad, whether because it stretches the knowledge of human ignorance into the infinite, or because there are many ways in which God's precepts are obeyed and he is pleased, according to the divisions and gifts of graces. For not all things are expected from all, nor can all fulfil all things to the full measure of pleasing. One pleases by fasting, another wins favor by simplicity of faith, another redeems his vices by almsgiving, another completes himself by love; just as to one the power of healing is granted, to another the knowledge of prophecy is given, to another firmness of faith, to another wisdom and knowledge. So God's commandment is broad and spreads into all kinds of our hope, so that it is not hard, if the will is there, to obey God's precept, since it is broad and spread out for pleasing by the variety of religion. And not only broad, but exceedingly broad: the infinity of its breadth being shown by this very addition. Amen.
Tractates 118, chapter 13
118.13.1CSEL 22:467
Utile hoc nobis ac necessarium prophetae opus est, quod ad perfectam dei cognitionem atque oboeditionem edocemur. duabus rebus maxime nostrae congruis instituit: ut et deum, qui ignoratus sit, nouerimus et mandatis eius secundum decreti sui obtemperemus. perfectum enim legis, prophetarum et euangeliorum uirum in omni psalmi istius corpore propheta conformat uel ex sua uel ex alterius, quem instituat, persona, cui in fiducia sit, haec de se, quae sunt, praedicare. est autem dignum contueri, qua uerborum diligentia, qua intellegentise absolutione nos in singulis quibusque dictorum generibus propheta confirmet.
This work of the prophet is useful and necessary for us, in that we are taught to perfect knowledge of and obedience to God. He has instructed us in two things most fitting for us: that we should know God, who was unknown, and obey his commandments according to the rule of his decree. For throughout the whole body of this psalm the prophet shapes the man perfect in the law, the prophets, and the gospels, either from his own person or from that of another whom he instructs, who may have the confidence to declare these things of himself. And it is worth observing with what care in words and with what completeness of understanding the prophet strengthens us in each kind of saying.
118.13.2CSEL 22:467–468
Dicit enim in tertiae decimae litterae uersu: quomodo dilexi legem tuam, domine! tota die meditatio est mihi. promptum utique fuerat dixisse: quomodo feci legem tuam! sed quia maius meritum est, amantem aliquid potius agere quam timentem, idcirco ait:. differt enim longe obsequium amoris a timoris officio; nec habet gratiam uoluntatis necessitatis operatio. non omnia enim ad perfecti obsequii consummationem sibi illa sufficiunt. quae, quamuis opus suum inpleant, tamen, quia coacta sunt, merito plenae gratiae indigent. uult igitur propheta opus suum dilectionis potius quam terroris esse, et ex caritate obsequium suum, non ex metu suscipi. multi ieiunant, dum a nobis obiurgari timent. multi aliquid in usum indigentium praebent, dum exprobrari inreligiosam suae et inutilem cupiditatem pertimescunt. multi ecclesiam adeunt, dum argui absentiam suam et neglegentiam erubescunt. sed non omnes id, quod, et amant. in amore ergo non potest incidere necessitas, quia nemo id, quod diligit, non uult. in facto uero potest et non subesse dilectio, dum id efficitur, quod non fecisse aut terror aut pudor sit. sed propheta in nullo infirmus est. quod amat, facit et, quod facit, indeficienter exercet. legem enim, quia diligit, omni die et sine intermissione meditatur. non subrepunt alia occupationum studia, non interueniunt diuersi curarum aestus, nec in eum incidit interiectu nouae alicuius cognitionis obliuio: semper idem est et in eodem est. tantus ipse in dilectae sibi legis meditatione est, quantus dies uniuersus in tempore sit.
For he says in the verse of the thirteenth letter: "How I have loved your law, Lord! All the day it is my meditation." It would certainly have been easy to say, "How I have done your law!" But because it is a greater merit to do something out of love than out of fear, therefore he said "How I have loved." For the obedience of love differs greatly from the duty of fear; and the working of necessity does not have the grace of the will. For those things are not enough in themselves for the completion of perfect obedience which, although they fulfil their task, yet, because they are compelled, lack the merit of full grace. So the prophet wants his work to be one of love rather than of terror, and his obedience to be undertaken out of charity, not out of fear. Many fast because they fear to be rebuked by us. Many give something for the use of the needy because they dread having their irreligious and useless greed reproached. Many come to church because they are ashamed to have their absence and negligence censured. But not all love what they do. In love, then, necessity cannot enter, because no one does not want what he loves. But in a deed love can be absent, when that is done which terror or shame forbids one not to have done. But the prophet is weak in nothing. What he loves he does, and what he does he practises unfailingly. For because he loves the law, he meditates on it every day and without ceasing. No other pursuits of business creep in, no different surges of cares intervene, nor does forgetfulness fall upon him through the intrusion of some new knowledge: he is always the same and in the same thing. He is as great in meditating on the law he loves as the whole day is in time.
118.13.3CSEL 22:468
Et quia, ut superius commemorauimus, legis et prophetarum atque euangeliorum hominem in se propheta demonstrat, ait in consequenti uersu: super inimicos meos prudentem me fecisti mandato tuo, quoniam in mihi est. mandata dei prudentius propheta quam inimici eius intellegit. sed quid commune nobis et inimicis nostris in praeceptis est dei, qui non solum ne mediocriter quidem conperta habent, uerum ne initium saltim cognoscendi consectantur? et quid magnum, si inimicis suis in mandatis dei propheta prudentior sit? quando enim inanimantia saxa et aut metalla aut ligna uenerantes consequi aliquid de uiuentis atque aeterni dei cognitione potuissent, ut his conparatis fieret propheta prudentior? sed omnis hic impiorum error ipsum illud nomen cum lege et prophetis et apostolis respuit, retractat, horrescit.
And because, as we mentioned above, the prophet shows in himself the man of the law, the prophets, and the gospels, he says in the following verse: "You have made me wiser than my enemies by your commandment, for it is mine for ever." The prophet understands God's commandments more wisely than his enemies. But what do we have in common in God's precepts with our enemies, who not only have not even moderately learned them, but do not even pursue the beginning of knowing them? And what great thing is it if the prophet is wiser than his enemies in God's commandments? For when could those who worship lifeless stones and metals or wood have gained anything of the knowledge of the living and eternal God, so that the prophet should be wiser by comparison with them? But all this error of the impious rejects, shrinks from, and abhors that very name together with the law, the prophets, and the apostles.
118.13.4CSEL 22:468–469
Sed ueros habet alios propheta hic sanctus inimicos, quibus prudentius in mandatis dei est eruditus. mandatum dei in prophetis et in lege habent, sed nullo eorum per inperitiam uoluntatis utuntur. mandatum legis tamquam proprium et hereditarium sibi uindicant, sed spiritalis auctorem non habentibus quid in signo tantum constituta iam proderit? quid sabbati religio deum sabbati nescientibus opis adferet? quid paschae agnus et liminum sanguis et azymorum festiuitas agnum dei et azyma sinceritatis et sanguinem salutis ignorantibus auxilii praestabit? mandata exercent, sed efficientiam mandatorum et tempus ignorant. legem legunt, sed eam legente et nesciente Christianus intellegit. inimicus plane prophetae est, parricidales manus unigenito dei filio inferens et saluatorem generis humani et aeternae largitorem morte, quantum in ipso est, condemnans. prae his ergo omnibus in dei mandato prudentior est.
But this holy prophet has other, real enemies, than whom he was taught more wisely in God's commandments. They have God's commandment in the prophets and in the law, but through the ignorance of their will they use none of it. They claim the commandment of the law as their own and inherited, but what profit now will things established only as a sign be to those who do not have the author of the spiritual meaning? What help will the observance of the Sabbath bring to those who do not know the God of the Sabbath? What aid will the lamb of the Passover and the blood on the doorposts and the feast of unleavened bread give to those who do not know the Lamb of God and the unleavened bread of sincerity and the blood of salvation? They practise the commandments, but they do not know the effect and the time of the commandments. They read the law, but while the Jew reads it without knowing, the Christian understands it. He is plainly the prophet's enemy who laid parricidal hands on the only-begotten Son of God and, as far as was in him, condemned to death the Savior of the human race and the giver of eternal life. Beyond all these, then, he is wiser in God's commandment.
118.13.5CSEL 22:469–470
Atque ut hos inimicos significasse intellegeretur, id, quod consequitur, adiecit: super omnes docentes me intellexi, quoniam testimonia tua meditatio mea est. didicisti, o Dauid, a Moyse legem, et Aaron tibi omnium doctor est, Iesus iteratae circumcisionis magister est, Samuel ungendi tibi sacramentum in temetipso et prophetae et regis ostendit: quid est istud, quod loqui ausus es, quod super omnes te docentes intellexeris? sed superior uersus, super quos omnes docentes se intellegat, ostendit, id est super inimicos. et rursum hic, qui nunc est uersus inferior, qui inimici sint, declarat, id est omnes docentes. claues enim se caelorum habere profitentur et doctores esse se legis gloriantur. et cum omnia legis testimonia aduentum domini nostri Iesu Christi testentur, super doctores suos propheta intellegit, qui unigenitum dei filium in carne uenturum, testimonia. eius meditans, semper expectet. o felix discipuli intellegentia! o doctorum miserabilis inperitia! docentes nesciunt, et intellegunt qui docentur. caret autem propheta uitio: intellegentiae enim unde adeptus esset, ostendit. nam superius ait, quod super inimicos suos prudentior a deo in mandatis eius esset effectus. intellegentia enim omnis ex eo est, qui prudentiorem eum esse constituit. super docentes se ergo intellegit.
And so that he might be understood to have meant these enemies, he added what follows: "I have understood more than all who teach me, because your testimonies are my meditation." You learned the law from Moses, David, and Aaron is the teacher of all to you; Joshua is master of the repeated circumcision, Samuel showed you in yourself the mystery of anointing both prophet and king: what is this that you dared to say, that you have understood more than all who teach you? But the preceding verse shows above which teachers he understands, that is, above his enemies. And again this, which is now the following verse, declares who the enemies are, that is, all who teach. For they profess to have the keys of the heavens and glory that they are teachers of the law. And since all the testimonies of the law testify to the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, the prophet understands more than his teachers, since, meditating on his testimonies, he always waits for the only-begotten Son of God who is to come in the flesh. O happy understanding of the disciple! O wretched ignorance of the teachers! Those who teach do not know, and those who are taught understand. But the prophet is free of fault: for he showed from where he had gained his understanding. For above he says that he had been made wiser than his enemies by God in his commandments. For all understanding is from him who made him wiser. So he understands more than those who teach him.
118.13.6CSEL 22:470
Et quia interdum ex diuersitate soleat accidere, ut discipulus prudentior sit magistro, tamen hoc ipsum diligentiae et studii esse demonstrat. ait enim: super seniores intellexi: quia mandata tua exquisiui. intellegit et super seniores intellegit, doctrinae atque suae officium cum ipsa temporis antiquitate demonstrans, id est populi ante se anterioris significans. in quo utrumque conuenit, ut et antiquior sit et se putet esse doctorem. sed super eum ille intellegit, qui et docetur et iunior est; intellegit uero, quia mandata dei exquisierit, quae doctor, dum se docere credit, ignorat.
And because it sometimes happens from difference of gifts that a disciple is wiser than his master, he shows that this very thing is a matter of diligence and zeal. For he says: "I have understood more than the elders, because I sought out your commandments." He understands, and understands more than the elders, showing their office of teaching together with the very antiquity of time, that is, signifying the people that was before him. In this both come together, that he is both older and thinks himself a teacher. But he understands more than him who is both taught and younger; and he understands because he has sought out God's commandments, which the teacher, while he thinks he is teaching, does not know.
118.13.7CSEL 22:470
Consequens autem est, ut, qui super seniores et doctores intellegit, fructum reddat, scilicet, ut ea, quae cognita et perfecta habere, exerceat. et uideamus, an hoc ipsum in consequentibus sit. ait enim: ab omni uia mala prohibui pedes meos, ut custodiam uerbum tuum. perfecta haec et euangelici uiri uox est, ab omni se uia abstinere et, tot ubique occurrentibus erroris semitis, nulla earum, per quam nequitia adeatur, incedere.
It follows that one who understands more than the elders and teachers should yield fruit, namely, that he should practise what he holds as known and perfect. And let us see whether this very thing is in what follows. For he says: "I have kept my feet from every evil way, that I may keep your word." This is the perfect voice of a gospel man: to keep himself from every way and, though so many paths of error meet him everywhere, to walk in none of them by which wickedness is approached.
118.13.8CSEL 22:470–471
Sed altius nescio quid in eo propheta significat, cum dicit: prohibui pedes meos. natura corporis nostri fert nos in omnem criminum cursum, et humanarum cupiditatum inpetus in hanc nos uiam cogit. sed qui super seniores et docentes intellegit, per doctrinam se prohibuit et exeuntem procurrentemque reuocauit. resistendum ergo est et obnitendum, ut nosmetipsos ab omni uia mala primum arceamus, tum deinde, si qui nos instinctus eo ferre, retrahamus: et prius nostramet ipsi potestate sumus inhibendi, ut deinceps dei uerbum. antea autem propria inhibitione opus est, ut possit dei uerbi esse custodia. neque enim quisquam uerbum ante custodiet, et tum prohibere se poterit. prohibitio enim ea demum est, ut id, quod fiebat, fieri arceatur; custodia uero tum firma est, cum se quis a malis inhibens bona obseruet sine intermissione.
But the prophet means something deeper when he says, "I have kept my feet." The nature of our body carries us into every course of crimes, and the impulse of human desires drives us into this way. But one who understands more than the elders and teachers has, by teaching, restrained himself, and called himself back as he was going out and running ahead. So we must resist and strive, first to keep ourselves from every evil way, then, if any impulse carries us there, to draw ourselves back; and first we must restrain ourselves by our own power, so that afterwards we may keep the word of God. But our own restraint is needed first, so that there may be a keeping of God's word. For no one will keep the word first and then be able to restrain himself. For restraint is precisely this, that what was being done is prevented from being done; but keeping is firm only when one, restraining himself from evil, observes the good without ceasing.
118.13.9CSEL 22:471
Qualis autem custodia uerbi dei esse debeat, sequens uersus docet. sequitur enim: a iudiciis tuis non declinaui: quia tu legem posuisti mihi. haec est igitur uera custodia, nullam in partem a dei se iudiciis deflectere neque leui saltim declinare decessu, sed intentum semper et semper inmobilem in eo, in quo institit, permanere.
What the keeping of God's word should be, the following verse teaches. For there follows: "I have not turned aside from your judgments, because you have set a law for me." This, then, is true keeping: not to swerve in any direction from God's judgments, nor to turn aside even by a slight departure, but to remain always intent and always unmoved in that in which one has taken one's stand.
118.13.10CSEL 22:471–472
Non declinat autem, quia legem sibi deus statuerit. legem quidem Moyses statuerat; sed hic idem propheta in psalmo altero orauerat dicens: domine, constitue legislatorem: sciant gentes, quoniam homines sunt. ea enim lex, quam Moyses scripserat, nobis in Christo fuit: et idcirco super docentes se et seniores intellegit, quia legem euangelicam, Moysi lege continetur, intellegit. haec ergo per dominum nostrum lata est, haec omnem hominem in scientiam dei erudiuit. et idcirco ad id,: constitue legislatorem super eos, adiecit: sciant gentes, quoniam homines sunt: id est ex terra genitae et in cognitionem dei ex limo. quod enim antea per ignorationem legis Moysi nesciebant, nunc per domini nostri Iesu Christi sciunt; et ut originem suam, id est corporis naturam in latore legis agnoscunt, ita et gloriam noui huius latoris legis expectant, in exordio sui iam ad imaginem et similitudinem dei constitutae.
He does not turn aside, because God has set a law for him. Moses indeed had set a law; but this same prophet in another psalm had prayed, saying: "Lord, appoint a lawgiver; let the nations know that they are men." For that law which Moses had written was for us in Christ; and therefore he understands more than his teachers and elders, because he understands the gospel law which is contained in the law of Moses. This, then, was given through our Lord; this has trained every man in the knowledge of God. And therefore, to "Appoint a lawgiver over them," he added, "let the nations know that they are men": that is, born of the earth and brought from the clay into the knowledge of God. For what they did not know before through ignorance of the law of Moses, they now know through the law of our Lord Jesus Christ; and as they recognize their origin, that is, the nature of the body, in the giver of the law, so too they await the glory of this new lawgiver, they who in their beginning were already established in the image and likeness of God.
118.13.11CSEL 22:472
Et huius euangelicae dulcedinem in consequentibus propheta testatur. ait enim: quam dulcia faucibus meis eloquia tua, super in ore meo! in ore, non etiam in faucibus dulce est. extra regionem enim oris corporalium saporum nullus est sensus. sed dei eloquia in faucibus dulcia sunt, in animam scilicet defluentia et interna penetrantia: - non in ore modo cibi placentia, sed illic dulcia. ubi cognitionis et prudentiae et sensus est. et ideo eloquia in faucibus et in ore dulce est. sed ut per aegritudinem aestumque febrium ea, quae acciderint oris amara, mitificat, ita animae nostrae amaritudines et tristes cupiditatum insalutarium febres infusa dei eloquia mitificant, si modo non ore contineantur, sed faucibus deuorentur.
And the prophet testifies to the sweetness of this gospel law in what follows. For he says: "How sweet are your words to my throat, above honey to my mouth!" Honey is sweet in the mouth, not also in the throat. For outside the region of the mouth there is no sense of bodily tastes. But God's words are sweet in the throat, flowing down into the soul and penetrating within: not pleasing only in the mouth like food, but sweet there where there is knowledge, prudence, and sense. And therefore the words are sweet in the throat, as honey is in the mouth. But as honey soothes the bitter things that come to the mouth through sickness and the heat of fevers, so God's words, poured in, soothe the bitterness of our soul and the sad fevers of unwholesome desires, provided they are not held in the mouth but swallowed by the throat.
118.13.12CSEL 22:472–473
Sequitur deinde: a mandatis tuis intellexi; propterea odiui omnem uiam iniquitatis. intellegentes nos faciunt praecepta, sed praecepta. re atque opere expleta: id est, ut ea, his continentur, in quantum possumus,. ergo efficienda praecepta sunt, ut simus intellegentes. et licet a deo intellegentia perfecta sit, tamen a nobis incipiendum est, ut possimus perfectam intellegentiam promereri. his enim, qui non hoc per se inchoant, clausa a deo omnia sunt. et idipsum propheticus sermo per Esaiam docet dicentem: ne dicas de mandatis meis, quod ea: neque cognouisti, neque credidisti ea, neque ab initio aperui tibi aures. cognoui enim, quod spernens sperneres, et quod inicus adhuc ex uentre uocandus esses. ergo non indulgetur scientia non adpetentibus eam. et quia deus cordium scrutator est, his, qui spreturi eam essent, obtusae aures sunt et hebes sensus est. sed propheta a praeceptis dei intellegit, praecepta scilicet agens intellegentiam consecutus: intellegens uero omnem uiam iniquitatis odit.
Then follows: "From your commandments I have understood; therefore I have hated every way of iniquity." The precepts make us understanding, but precepts fulfilled in deed and work: that is, that we should do what is contained in them, as far as we can. So the precepts must be carried out, so that we may be understanding. And although perfect understanding is from God, yet we must begin, so that we may be able to deserve perfect understanding. For to those who do not begin this of themselves, all things are closed by God. And the prophetic word teaches this very thing through Isaiah, who says: "Do not say of my commandments that you knew them; you neither knew nor believed them, nor did I open your ears from the beginning. For I knew that you would utterly despise, and that you would be called wicked even from the womb." So knowledge is not granted to those who do not seek it. And because God is the searcher of hearts, for those who were going to despise it the ears are dulled and the sense blunted. But the prophet understands from God's precepts, having gained understanding by doing the precepts; and understanding, he hates every way of iniquity.
118.13.13CSEL 22:473–474
Humanae enim naturae omnes diuersarum adfectionum adiacent motus, ut sunt odii et amoris. sed amor inpendendus est in dilectionem bonorum. odium autem adsumendum est ex offensa malorum. nostrum ergo est, modo utilis organi corpora nostra in coaptatos et concinentes modos temperare, ut non uitia diligamus, ut non uirtutes bonas oderimus, ut unicuique nos generi decenter atque utiliter coaptemus. propheta mandata dei diligit: et qui mandata dei diligit, iniquitatis uias odit. ut enim perfectae fidei obsequellae est, diligere et id, quod quia agit, adfectu caritatis explere et necessitatem agendi amantis uoluntate, ita et magnae est, iniquitates non modo non agere, sed odisse, quia interdum nos ab his metus et terror auertat. odium autem nobis earum iudicium et perfectae de his opinionis insinuat. diligamus ergo iustitiam, modestiam, frugalitatem, misericordiam; et oderimus rixas et ebrietates, caedes, superbias, stupra, cum quibus necesse est et diabolum oderimus. diligentes uero pacem, ueritatem, iustitiam diligemus eum, qui est pax, iustitia et ueritas, dominum nostrum Iesum, qui est benedictus in saecula saeculorum. amen.
For all the movements of different feelings, such as hatred and love, lie close to human nature. But love must be spent on loving good things, and hatred must be taken up from offense at evil things. It is ours, then, to tune our bodies like a useful instrument to fitting and harmonious measures, so that we do not love vices, so that we do not hate good virtues, so that we fit ourselves to each kind fittingly and usefully. The prophet loves God's commandments; and whoever loves God's commandments hates the ways of iniquity. For as it belongs to the obedience of perfect faith to love, and to fulfil what one does with the feeling of charity, and to fulfil the necessity of acting with the will of one who loves, so too it belongs to great faith not only not to do iniquities but to hate them, since sometimes fear and terror turn us away from them. But hatred of them instils in us a judgment and settled opinion about them. Let us, then, love righteousness, modesty, frugality, mercy; and let us hate quarrels and drunkenness, murders, pride, and sexual immorality, and with them we must also hate the devil. And loving peace, truth, and righteousness, we shall love him who is peace, righteousness, and truth, our Lord Jesus, who is blessed for ever and ever. Amen.
Tractates 118, chapter 14
118.14.1CSEL 22:474–475
Vita sensusque hominum in errore ac potius nocte inscientiae manet, dum carnali infecta contagio in profundo ignorantiae per grauitatem naturae, cui admixta est, detinetur. quando enim per semetipsum causam et rationem originis nouerit? quando sciet, qui uitae suae fructus sit, quae condicio spei, quae promerendae posteritatis uia? neque enim quisquam tam demens aut inops sensu est, ut in id, cum nullus esset, natum se esse existimet, ut rursum, postquam natus est, nullus esset; cum sine dubio meminerit ex bonitate dei profectum esse, quod natus est, nec id in bonitatem eius cadat., ut in nobis hoc suum. quo nascimur, munus interimat. sed propheta cognitione rerum caelestium dignus et in lucem scientiae munere dei et eloquio collocatus ducem ad bene et innocenter uiuendum eum sequitur, qui lux uera est et qui omnem hominem lucificat.
The life and mind of men remain in error, or rather in the night of ignorance, while, infected by fleshly contagion, they are held in the depth of ignorance by the weight of the nature with which they are mixed. For when will man know by himself the cause and reason of his origin? When will he know what is the fruit of his life, what the condition of his hope, what the way of earning the future? For no one is so mad or so lacking in sense as to think that he was born, when he did not exist, only to not exist again after he was born; since he will surely remember that his being born came from the goodness of God, and that it does not befit his goodness that he should destroy in us this gift of his by which we are born. But the prophet, worthy of the knowledge of heavenly things and placed in the light of knowledge by God's gift and word, follows as guide to living well and innocently him who is the true light and who enlightens every man.
118.14.2CSEL 22:475
Hanc ergo suae ignorantiam quodam praelato lumine ad dirigit dicens: lucerna pedibus meis uerbum tuum. scit se, nisi uerbo dei inluminatum, has corporum tenebras et hanc saeculi noctem ferre non posse. scit ubique adesse lapides offensionum, laqueos funium, scrobes fouearum. ut enim quis nocte egressus lucernam antefert et quo pedem inferat contuetur atque ad singulos gressus lumine sollicitus est, ita unusquisque nostrum manens in se uerbum dei in omnes operum processus tamquam lucernam omnis etenim doctrina caelestis dux nobis ad iter est, quae lucernae modo in hac nocte est, cum aliquid aut agimus aut cogitamus aut loquimur, ut ea in omnem progressum cuiuscumque operationis utamur.
So he directs the ignorance of his nature by a kind of light carried before him, saying: "Your word is a lamp to my feet." He knows that unless he is enlightened by God's word, he cannot bear this darkness of bodies and this night of the world. He knows that everywhere there are stumbling stones, snares of cords, hollows of pits. For as one who goes out at night carries a lamp before him and looks where to set his foot and takes care with the light at every step, so each of us should carry the word of God abiding in him like a lamp before all the progress of his works; for all heavenly teaching is our guide on the journey, which is like a lamp in this night, whenever we do, think, or say anything, so that we may use it in every advance of any action.
118.14.3CSEL 22:475–476
Iubet dominus in euangeliis hanc praeceptorum suorum lucernam non otiosam et inutilem occuli, dicens: nemo enim lucernam accendit et ponit eam sub modio. quae enim, si modio tegatur, utilitas est? usum suum tantum intra id, quo operitur, inpendit. iubet igitur eam in candelabro, id est in officii sui sede constitui. itaque hanc doctrinam atque hoc uerbum dei intra nos receptum non otiosum neque inutile tamquam modio occulamus, sed lumen istud nobis ipsis primum et rursus ex nobis omnibus gentibus praebeamus. sequenti quoque istud mandato dominus admonuit dicens: sint lumbi uestri, et ardentes. iubet ergo nihil nos agere in obscuro, quia omnis in peccatis agens odit lumen et diligit tenebras. uult has lucernas nostras esse semper accensas, ne quando in nocte huius saeculi relinquamur. in tabernaculo testimonii lucerna accenditur et haec omni festiuitatis tempore ardet. illi hoc, quod agunt, nesciunt. sed nos in his tabernaculorum nostrorum, id est corporum testimoniis ardentes lucernas semper habeamus et festiuitatem spei nostrae earum luce peragamus.
The Lord in the gospels commands that this lamp of his precepts not be hidden idle and useless, saying: "For no one lights a lamp and puts it under a bushel." For what use is it if it is covered by a bushel? It spends its use only within what covers it. So he commands it to be placed on a lampstand, that is, in the seat of its office. So let us not hide this teaching and this word of God received within us idle and useless, as under a bushel, but let us offer this light first to ourselves and then from ourselves to all nations. The Lord warned of this too in a following commandment, saying: "Let your loins be girded and your lamps burning." So he commands us to do nothing in the dark, because everyone who acts in sins hates the light and loves darkness. He wants these lamps of ours to be always lit, lest we be left in the night of this world. In the tabernacle of testimony a lamp is lit, and it burns at every time of festival. They do not know what they are doing. But let us, in these testimonies of our tabernacles, that is, of our bodies, always have burning lamps and carry out the festival of our hope by their light.
118.14.4CSEL 22:476
Apostolos quoque, quos sal. quos et lumen mundi dominus nuncupat, per hanc significationem hos et lucernas esse ecclesiae ostendit dicens: lucerna corporis tui est oculus tuus, corporis scilicet ecclesiae, unum corpus in Christo est, nosque inuicem eius membra sumus. primum enim unicuique nostrum dei uerbum sibi lucerna est; deinde uir apostolicus toti corpori suo, id est ecclesiae lucerna est. neque enim omne corpus aut pes aut oculus aut manus est. ergo si oculi, totius corporis pars lucidissima et ob id membris ceteris, erunt tenebrae, id est, si apostolorum non ardebunt lumine ipso in tenebris sito, quanta totius corporis nox manebit? Iohannes paenitentiae et Iudaeis et gentibus fuit, domino dicente: ille erat lucerna ardens et lucens, et uos uoluistis ad horam exultare in lumine eius. habemus ergo doctrinae lumen: exultemus in eo, non ad horam, sed semper; neque ad tempus. sed in aeternum. beatae uirgines illae et utiles olei mercatrices solae in lampadum suarum lumine cum sponso thalamum ingressae sunt, ceteris neglegentibus et dormientibus ab ingressu thalami exclusis.
The apostles too, whom the Lord calls the salt of the earth and the light of the world, he shows by this meaning to be also the lamps of the church, saying: "The lamp of your body is your eye": of the body, that is, of the church, which is one body in Christ, and we are members of one another. For first, to each of us God's word is a lamp; then the apostolic man is a lamp to his whole body, that is, to the church. For not the whole body is foot or eye or hand. So if the eyes, the brightest part of the whole body, and therefore to the other members, are darkness, that is, if they do not burn with the light of the apostles, light itself being set in darkness, how great a night will remain for the whole body? John was the lamp of repentance to both Jews and nations, as the Lord says: "He was a burning and shining lamp, and you were willing to rejoice for an hour in his light." We have, then, the light of teaching: let us rejoice in it, not for an hour but always; not for a time but for ever. Those blessed virgins, useful buyers of oil, alone entered the bridal chamber with the bridegroom in the light of their lamps, while the others, negligent and sleeping, were shut out from entering the chamber.
118.14.5CSEL 22:476–477
Ad omnem igitur animae nostrae pedem utamur dei uerbo ut lucerna, sed lucerna semper ardente, semper in officium suum per nostram prudentiam praeparata. uerbum autem, quod pedibus est, ipsum illud et semitis lumen est. sensim enim et domestice incedentibus lucerna opus est: autem et publicum iter ingredientibus lumen potius necessarium est, ne latro insidietur, ne ambiguae uiae error occurrat. per incrementa enim a minori ad maius acceditur, ut ei. cui uerbum dei primum lucerna sit pedibus, id ipsum uerbum ei fiat lumen in semitis. sed lucerna pedibus et lumen in semitis utilem profectum praestare debent. et uideamus, an dignum aliquid propheta subiecerit.
For every step of our soul, then, let us use the word of God as a lamp, but a lamp always burning, always prepared for its office by our prudence. And the word which is for the feet is itself also the light for the paths. For those walking gently and at home a lamp is needed; but for those entering the paths and the public road a light is rather necessary, lest a robber lie in wait, lest the error of an uncertain way meet them. For one advances by increments from lesser to greater, so that for one to whom the word of God is first a lamp to the feet, that same word becomes a light on the paths. But the lamp for the feet and the light on the paths ought to bring useful progress. And let us see whether the prophet has added something worthy.
118.14.6CSEL 22:477
Ait enim: iuraui et statui custodire iudicia. iam non in nocte errat, nec pedem metuit offendere. sacramentum enim omne firmatae scientiae res est, et iurandi religio ex ueritatis cognitione suscipitur. iurat ergo propheta; nec tantum iurat, sed et statuit, quia sacramenti uinculum firmitas sit statutorum. statuit ergo iurans custodire iudicia dei. et difficile est statuta conuelli, et optimum est statuere iurata.
For he says: "I have sworn and determined to keep your judgments." He no longer wanders in the night, nor fears to stumble his foot. For every oath is a matter of confirmed knowledge, and the sanctity of swearing is undertaken from knowledge of the truth. So the prophet swears; and he not only swears but also determines, because the bond of an oath is the firmness of what is determined. So, swearing, he determined to keep God's judgments. And it is hard for what is determined to be overturned, and it is best to determine what has been sworn.
118.14.7CSEL 22:477–478
Sed meminit nihil esse in dei iudiciis iniustum. si enim humana iudicia ea uere iudicia existimantur, quae ex arbitrio iudicii sanciuntur, nedum modo ambigendum sit, nihil esse in dei iudiciis iniustum. amittimus liberos; iniustum hoc iudicium existimamus. numquid iniuste deus in Iob filios dedit diabolo potestatem? damna nostra tamquam inique accidentia dolemus. numquid egere solum illum perfectum uirum deus r m sine ratione permisit? cruciamur doloribus et contra deum inpatientiae nostrae querellis increpamus. anne incerto consilio exesus uermibus, sanie defluens, perfossus ulcere fuit? certe haec omnia ad docimentum fidei et ad praemium gloriosae profecerunt. infirmitas nostra efficit, ut malum esse id, quod patimur, existimemus. ceterum dei semper uoluntas est, ut patientia passionum probemur: nos uero diuini iudicii iustitiam, dum sine docimento fidei latere uolumus, inprobamus.
But he remembers that there is nothing unjust in God's judgments. For if human judgments are truly reckoned judgments which are decreed by the decision of a judge, much less is there any doubt that there is nothing unjust in God's judgments. We lose our children; we think this judgment unjust. Did God unjustly give the devil power over Job's children? We grieve over our losses as though they happened unjustly. Did God without reason let that perfect man alone be in need? We are tormented by pains, and with the complaints of our impatience we rail against God. Was it by an uncertain counsel that he was eaten by worms, running with pus, pierced with sores? Certainly all these things served for the proof of faith and for a glorious reward. Our weakness makes us think that what we suffer is evil. But it is always God's will that we be proved by patience in sufferings; while we, wishing to stay hidden without the proof of faith, condemn the justice of the divine judgment.
118.14.8CSEL 22:478
Sed qui superius et iurauerat et statuerat, ut custodiret iudicia iustitiae dei, dignum aliquid sacramento et constitutione sua in obseruandis debet praestare iudiciis. non enim leue est. quod custoditurum se statuit iuratus. et quid illud sit, sequens uersus loquitur. ait enim: humiliatus sum usquequaque. domine: uiuifica me secundum uerbum tuum. unigenitus dei filius naturae nostrae ex uirgine sibi corpus adsumens, cum in se ipso ueram et perfectam humanae formam praebuisset, quid a se disci tamquam exemplo doctrinae uoluerit, noscendum est. ait enim: uenite omnes, qui laboratis et onerati estis, et ego uos reficiam. tollite iugum meum super uos et discite a me, quoniam mitis sum et humilis corde: et inuenietis requiem animabus uestris. ipse utique perfectus et sine peccato solus et unus, in cuius ore non fuit, hoc praecipuum a se doctrinae sumi exemplum, mansuetudinis scilicet et humilitatis, per quae animabus requies inueniretur.
But he who above had both sworn and determined to keep the judgments of God's justice must show something worthy of his oath and resolve in observing the judgments. For what he determined on oath to keep is not a light thing. And what it is, the following verse says. For he says: "I have been humbled exceedingly, Lord; give me life according to your word." We must learn what the only-begotten Son of God, taking to himself a body of our nature from the virgin, when he had shown in himself the true and perfect form of man, wanted to be learned from him as an example of teaching. For he says: "Come to me, all you who labor and are burdened, and I will refresh you. Take my yoke upon you and learn from me, for I am gentle and humble of heart; and you will find rest for your souls." He, perfect and alone and the only one without sin, in whose mouth there was no deceit, wanted this chief example of teaching to be taken from himself, namely of gentleness and humility, through which rest might be found for souls.
118.14.9CSEL 22:478–479
Scit insolentem esse et incapacem rerum secundarum naturae nostrae infirmitatem. alii per opes insolescunt nescientes de largitione opum dictum esse: eleemosyna enim abscondit peccatum; et rursum: dispersit, dedit pauperibus, iustitia eius manet in saeculum; et dominum ipsum his, qui esurientem cibassent, sitientem potassent, peregrinum domo recepissent, nudum ueste texissent, infirmum uisitassent, clausum carcere consolati essent, dixisse: uenite,, possidete praeparatum uobis regnum a constitutione mundi. alii gloriae saeculi tument nescientes hunc principalem benedictionum caelestium fuisse sermonem: beati pauperes spiritu, quoniam ipsorum est regnum caelorum. alios nobilitas in fastidium erigit non cogitantes illis, qui in Christo renati sint, dictum esse: uos autem genus electum, regale sacerdotium, genus sanctum. sunt saeculi leges, alia dei munera. diabolus cum dominum temptare ausus est, suum esse saeculum gloriatur. dominus uero mori nos saeculo iubet, ut uiuamus ipsi. cum domino opum contemptus opulentia est, cum domino terreni honoris despectus caelorum regnum est, cum domino humilitas cordis generosae et regiae natiuitatis ornatus est. hoc igitur a se disci uoluit, quod uirtutum omnium maximum est.
He knows that the weakness of our nature is insolent and unable to bear prosperity. Some grow insolent through wealth, not knowing that it was said of the giving of wealth: "For almsgiving hides sin"; and again: "He has scattered, he has given to the poor; his righteousness abides for ever"; and that the Lord himself said to those who had fed the hungry, given drink to the thirsty, taken the stranger into their home, covered the naked with clothing, visited the sick, and comforted the one shut in prison: "Come, blessed of my Father, possess the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world." Others swell with the glory of the world, not knowing that this was the first saying of the heavenly blessings: "Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven." Noble birth lifts others into disdain, not considering that to those reborn in Christ it was said: "But you are a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy race." The laws of the world are one thing, the gifts of God another. The devil, when he dared to tempt the Lord, boasted that the world was his. But the Lord commands us to die to the world so that we may live to him. With the Lord, contempt of wealth is riches; with the Lord, disdain of earthly honor is the kingdom of heaven; with the Lord, humility of heart is the ornament of a noble and royal birth. This, then, he wanted to be learned from him, which is the greatest of all virtues.
118.14.10CSEL 22:479–480
Apostolus etiam ad humilitatem nos docens talibus adhortatur: hoc enim sapite in uobis, Iesu, qui cum in forma dei esset, non rapinam existimauit esse se deo, sed se exinaniuit formam serui accipiens, et habitu repertus ut homo. humiliauit se factus oboediens usque ad mortem, mortem autem crucis. habemus exemplum ab unigenito deo humilitatis; sed uideamus et praemium. propter hoc enim eum deus exaltauit et donauit ei nomen, quod est super omne nomen, ut in nomine Iesu omne genu flectat caelestium et terrestrium et infernorum, et omnis lingua confiteatur, quia dominus Iesus in gloria est dei patris. hoc humilitatis fuit praemium, ut corpus adsumptum in gloria dei patris maneret, ut in nomine eius genu caelestis et terrestria et inferna curuarent. manens enim in dei forma non ui aliqua sibi ac rapina, id quod erat, existimauit, scilicet ut deo esset aequalis. erat enim in dei forma, nihilque ei ex eius gloria deerat, in cuius forma manebat; sed formam serui per humilitatem accepit et habitu ut homo repertus est, humilians se per usque ad mortem: nec solum usque ad mortem, sed usque ad mortem crucis. caelum ex praecepto dei ipse, mundum ex iussu paterno in hanc speciem tanti decoris ornauit, terram et, quae in his sunt, creauit. sed numquid ob illa meruit hominem adsumptum in aeterni patris gloria collocare? humilitatis hoc praemium est, humilitatis haec merces est, ut, quia manens antea in forma dei esset in forma serui deinceps effectus, et manens in forma dei et effectus in forma serui confessione caelestium et terrestrium et infernorum esse in dei patris gloria nosceretur.
The apostle too, teaching us humility, exhorts us thus: "Let this mind be in you which was also in Christ Jesus, who, being in the form of God, did not think it robbery to be equal with God, but emptied himself, taking the form of a servant, and was found in fashion as a man. He humbled himself, becoming obedient unto death, even the death of the cross." We have the example of humility from the only-begotten God; but let us see the reward too. "For this reason God exalted him and gave him the name which is above every name, that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven and on earth and under the earth, and every tongue confess that the Lord Jesus is in the glory of God the Father." This was the reward of humility, that the body he had taken should remain in the glory of God the Father, that at his name things in heaven, on earth, and under the earth should bend the knee. For remaining in the form of God, he did not think what he was to be a matter of force or robbery for himself, namely that he was equal to God. For he was in the form of God, and nothing was lacking to him of the glory of him in whose form he remained; but he took the form of a servant through humility and was found in fashion as a man, humbling himself through obedience unto death; and not only unto death, but unto the death of the cross. He himself adorned the heaven at God's command, the world at the Father's bidding, in this appearance of such great beauty; he created the earth and the things in them. But did he for those things deserve to set the man he had taken in the glory of the eternal Father? This is the reward of humility, this the wage of humility: that because, though he was before remaining in the form of God, he was afterwards made in the form of a servant, and remaining in the form of God and made in the form of a servant, he should be known by the confession of things in heaven, on earth, and under the earth to be in the glory of God the Father.
118.14.11CSEL 22:480–481
quoque idem apostolus, ne quos ipsa illa diuinorum munerum gratia efficeret insolentes, ait: unicuique data est demonstratio spiritus ad utilitatem. enim quod ait: ad utilitatem, docuit eo humiliter utendum, ne forte quemquam spiritalium donorum confidentia efficeret insolentem, et dei gratia per insolentiae uitium fieret otiosa. ex persona autem sua ipse demonstrat, etiam hoc esse se deo gratiae consecutum, ne per confidentiam plurium in se gratiarum in aliquem tumorem tolleretur, dicens: et propter eminentiam reuelationum datus est mihi stimulus carnis, angelus, qui me colaphizaret. ne extollar. etiam hoc ille uas electionis et doctor gentium metuit, ne ultra humanae infirmitatis naturam per spiritalium in se munerum confidentiam superbiret. Ezechiam regem scriptura laudat, quod fecerit rectum et bonum in dei, sed non usque in finem potuit manere laudatio. scriptum enim est in secundo Praeteritorum libro: et cecidit Ezechias ab altitudine cordis sui. ubi cor in altum erexerat, ubi in superbiam se per confidentiam laudationis extulerat, praeteritorum gestorum gratiam per superbiae crimen amisit.
The same apostle too, lest the very grace of the divine gifts should make some insolent, says: "To each is given the manifestation of the Spirit for profit." For in saying "for profit" he taught that it must be used humbly, lest confidence in spiritual gifts should make anyone insolent, and the grace of God become idle through the vice of insolence. And from his own person he shows that he obtained even this grace from God, that he should not be lifted into any swelling through confidence in the many graces in him, saying: "And because of the greatness of the revelations a thorn in the flesh was given me, an angel to buffet me, lest I be exalted." Even that chosen vessel and teacher of the nations feared this, lest he grow proud beyond the nature of human weakness through confidence in the spiritual gifts in him. Scripture praises King Hezekiah because he did what was right and good in the sight of God, but the praise could not remain to the end. For it is written in the second book of Chronicles: "And Hezekiah fell from the height of his heart." When he had raised his heart on high, when he had lifted himself into pride through confidence in praise, he lost the grace of his past deeds through the crime of pride.
118.14.12CSEL 22:481–482
Propheta igitur sacramento constituens, ut iusta dei iudicia custodiret, hoc primum opus sumpsit, ut humilis fieret, neque solum humilis, sed humilis ualde: per adiectionem hanc consummatae in se humilitatis modestiam docens. et erant causae in eo plures superbiendi. praebebat causas nobilitas ex Iuda, et in eo primum potestas benedictionis regiae inchoata. mansit enim aliquandiu ex Dauid tribu regiae potestatis familia, ex qua secundum carnem rex aeternus emersit. erat etiam prudentissimus;: et occulta sapientiae manifestasti mihi. meruit etiam et propheta esse, cum dicitur: aperiam in parabolis os meum, eructabo absconsa a constitutione mundi. humanae quoque opulentiae copiis abundauit. ait enim ipse: ecce congregaui de paupertate mea auri talenta milia tot et argenti alia et aeris et ferri, quorum non est. hinc nobilitas, hinc regis potestas, sapientiae fiducia, hinc prophetae meritum, hinc copiae facultatum; non erexerunt tamen in superbiam neque in aliquem fastidii tumorem extulerunt. tuto ergo postulat dicens: u i me secundum uerbum tuum, id est, ut tamquam nondum uiuens aeternae uitam secundum uerbum dei mereatur, quia eum humilitatis modestia intra disciplinam et doctrinam contineret.
So the prophet, determining by oath to keep God's just judgments, took up this as his first work, to become humble, and not only humble but exceedingly humble, teaching by this addition the modesty of complete humility in himself. And there were many causes in him for pride. His noble descent from Judah gave causes, and in him first the power of royal blessing began. For the family of royal power remained for some time from David's line, from which according to the flesh the eternal King came forth. He was also most wise, as he says: "And you have made known to me the hidden things of wisdom." He deserved also to be a prophet, as it is said: "I will open my mouth in parables; I will utter things hidden from the foundation of the world." He also abounded in the riches of human wealth. For he himself says: "Behold, from my poverty I have gathered so many thousand talents of gold, and others of silver, and of bronze and iron without number." Here noble birth, here a king's power, confidence in wisdom, here the merit of a prophet, here abundance of resources: yet they did not raise him into pride nor lift him into any swelling of disdain. So he asks safely, saying: "Give me life according to your word," that is, that as one not yet living he may deserve the life of eternity according to God's word, because the modesty of humility kept him within discipline and teaching.
118.14.13CSEL 22:482–483
Sequitur deinceps: uoluntaria oris mei fac beneplacita, domine, et iudicia tua doce me. digne propheta sacramentum constitutionis suae. primum enim humilis ualde effectus est; sequenti nunc orat, ut uoluntaria oris sui beneplaceant. non contentus est iam praescriptis legis contineri neque tantum necessitati subiacere. praeceperat malum pro malo reddendum. Dauid iste, cum Saul totis se. imperii sui uiribus persequentem frequenter captum et conclusum habuisset, non modo non peremit, sed etiam cum honore dimisit dicens: non inferam super eum manum meam, quia domini est. hunc etiam cum in bello peremptum conperisset, fleuit et uindicauit. filius quoque eius Abessalon regnum occupat, exercitum contrahit, patrem bello parricidali persequitur. sed militibus. Dauid dicit: parcite puero. illi quidem ad resistendum necessitas inposita est, ut regi; sed pietas et bonitas adfuit ad parcendum, ut prophetae. mortuum quoque paterno et dolore defleuit. haec enim, non legitima sunt: et his obtemperare libertatis potius quam necessitatis officium est.
Then follows: "Make the freewill offerings of my mouth well-pleasing, Lord, and teach me your judgments." The prophet worthily keeps the oath of his resolve. For first he was made exceedingly humble; next he now prays that the freewill offerings of his mouth may be well-pleasing. He is no longer content to be held by the prescriptions of the law nor only to be subject to necessity. The law had commanded evil to be repaid for evil. This David, when he had often caught and shut in Saul, who was persecuting him with all the forces of his rule, not only did not kill him but even let him go with honor, saying: "I will not lay my hand upon him, for he is the Lord's anointed." When he learned that he had been killed in battle, he wept and avenged him. His son Absalom too seizes the kingdom, gathers an army, pursues his father in parricidal war. But David says to the soldiers: "Spare the young man." The necessity of resistance was laid on him as king; but piety and goodness were present to spare, as a prophet. And when he was dead he wept for him with a father's grief. For these things are not of the law; and to obey them is a duty of freedom rather than of necessity.
118.14.14CSEL 22:483
Habet hanc apostolus, non et legitimae: de uirginibus autem praeceptum domini non habeo, consilium autem do. aut cum gloriam uiduitatis et continentiam laudat, non inhibet iam potestatem nubendi, sed meritum caelibatus praedicat. ultra legem instituit et ultra praeceptum adhortatur, uoluntaria legitimis anteponens. et rursum ait: numquid non habemus potestatem manducandi et bibendi? numquid non mulieres circumducendi, ceteri apostoli et fratres domini et Cephas? aut ego et non habemus potestatem non operandi? sed non utimur hac potestate. potestas in licito est, cum lex infidelitati nostrae parcens nos grauibus non onerat. at uero uoluntatis professio ei incremento fidei est, cum in his, quae moderata lex nobis est, nosmetipsos deuotionis studio continemus.
The apostle has this distinction of freewill things and things of the law: "Concerning virgins I have no command of the Lord, but I give counsel." Or when he praises the glory and continence of widowhood, he does not forbid the right to marry, but proclaims the merit of celibacy. He instructs beyond the law and exhorts beyond the precept, putting freewill things before things of the law. And again he says: "Do we not have the right to eat and drink? Do we not have the right to take women around with us, as the other apostles and the brothers of the Lord and Cephas? Or do I and Barnabas alone not have the right not to work? But we do not use this right." A right lies in what is permitted, when the law, sparing our weakness, does not burden us with heavy things. But the profession of the will is an increase of faith for him, when in the things in which the law is moderate toward us we restrain ourselves by the zeal of devotion.
118.14.15CSEL 22:483–484
Haec igitur uoluntaria, ut deo sint placita, propheta orat, quia illa, quae ex praescripto legis gerantur, ipsa seruitii sui necessitate peraguntur. causam autem semper deprecationis sua?. postea enim quam uoluntaria oris sui ut beneplacita essent orauit, adiecit: et iudicia tua doce me. iudicia legis agit et, quantum in se est, gestis atque operibus exercet; sed nondum ea intellegit. scit enim esse legem spiritalem. et illud, quod sub specie praesentium operationum continetur, nosse festinat: ea enim quis necesse est doceri postulet, quae ignorat.
These freewill things, then, the prophet prays may be pleasing to God, because those which are done by the prescription of the law are carried out by the very necessity of his service. And he always keeps the reason for his prayer. For after he prayed that the freewill offerings of his mouth might be well-pleasing, he added: "And teach me your judgments." He carries out the judgments of the law and, as far as he can, practises them in deeds and works; but he does not yet understand them. For he knows that the law is spiritual. And he hastens to know what is contained under the form of present works; for one must ask to be taught the things one does not know.
118.14.16CSEL 22:484
Totum autem se propheta secundum sacramenti sui constitutionem deo dedit. humiliatus est, uoluntaria oris eius placentia sunt: nunc eius anima in dei manibus semper est et legis dei non obliuiscitur dicens: anima mea in manibus tuis semper: et legem tuam non sum oblitus. totum, quod uiuit, deo uiuit. omnis eius sensus et spiritus in deo est; nullum tempus admittitur, quo legis possit obliuio. in omnibus operibus et cogitationibus deus cogitatur. lex in memoria est, in dei manibus semper anima uiuentis est.
The prophet, according to the resolve of his oath, gave himself wholly to God. He was humbled, the freewill offerings of his mouth are pleasing; now his soul is always in God's hands and he does not forget God's law, saying: "My soul is always in your hands, and I have not forgotten your law." All that he lives, he lives to God. All his sense and spirit is in God; no time is admitted in which there could be forgetfulness of the law. In all his works and thoughts God is thought of. The law is in his memory; the soul of the living man is always in God's hands.
118.14.17CSEL 22:484–485
Scit, quam sibi istud utile sit, scit, quam sit necessarium se manibus dei gestis atque operibus suis et per memoriam legis inserere. ait enim: posuerunt laqueum mihi: et de mandatis tuis non erraui. scit in hac saeculi silua plures laqueos extendi, plures captiones parari. sermo, cogitatio, opus nostrum semper adiacentes habent laqueos, cum interdum occurrit causa irae, doloris adfectio, querellae necessitas, malae cupiditatis occasio. haec diabolus angelique eius, ab initio transgressores et ab exordio peccatores, laqueos semper extendunt. sed cuius in manibus dei anima est et qui numquam legis dei inmemor est, his undique licet laqueis circumiectis a praeceptis tamen non. semper enim deum cogitans ab his euolat, ut in: sicut passer liberatus ex laqueo uenatorum. et dominus ipse per prophetam ait: liberate uenatorum et a uerbo conturbationis.
He knows how useful this is to him, he knows how necessary it is to place himself in God's hands by his deeds and works and through memory of the law. For he says: "They laid a snare for me, and I have not strayed from your commandments." He knows that in this forest of the world many snares are stretched and many traps prepared. Our speech, thought, and work always have snares lying near, when at times a cause for anger arises, a feeling of grief, a need to complain, an occasion of evil desire. These snares the devil and his angels, transgressors from the beginning and sinners from the start, always stretch out. But one whose soul is in God's hands and who is never forgetful of God's law, though snares are cast around him on every side, does not stray from the precepts. For always thinking of God, he flies away from them, so that he is like a sparrow set free from the snare of the fowlers. And the Lord himself says through the prophet: "He will set me free from the snare of the hunters and from a troubling word."
118.14.18CSEL 22:485
Non enim iniuste tenduntur retia auibus. in caelestem scientiam homo eruditus es; quid tibi cum terrenis operibus et gestis est? auis effectus es; cur non in elemento moraris? uolucres enim caeli nuncupantur; non iniuste ergo illis in possessione terrenae habitationis sunt. saeculo; quid tibi cum saeculi rebus? quid quereris captus in saeculo? quid quereris iniuriam laquei in regione non tua? dic potius et utere ipse tu uoce dicentis ista: quis dabit mihi pinnas sicut columbae? et uolabo et requiescam. natura auium est, ut non, cum uolent, requiescant: tu autem iam factus columba uolando requiescis, id est in caelestem te sedem et cognitionem a laqueis terrenis uolatu fidelis animae ecferendo.
For nets are not unjustly spread for birds. You have been trained in heavenly knowledge, O man; what have you to do with earthly works and deeds? You have been made a bird; why do you not stay in your element? For they are called birds of the sky; so it is not unjust that they are snared when they are in the possession of an earthly dwelling. You have died to the world; what have you to do with the things of the world? Why do you complain that you are caught in the world? Why do you complain of the injury of the snare in a region not your own? Say rather, and use yourself the voice of one who says: "Who will give me wings like a dove? And I will fly and be at rest." It is the nature of birds that they do not rest when they fly; but you, now made a dove, rest by flying, that is, by carrying yourself up by the flight of a faithful soul from earthly snares into the heavenly seat and knowledge.
118.14.19CSEL 22:485–486
Dehinc sequitur: hereditaui testimonia tua in; quia exultatio cordis mei sunt. heres secundum humanam consuetudinem omnia eius obtinet, cuius et heres est. sed humanas hereditates dedignatur propheta: testimonia dei hereditauit. gratum ipsi, si dei fiat ipse testis, quia exultatio cordis sui sit, si de deo inter persecutionum bella testetur. sic et meminimus his testimoniis apostolos gratulatos, cum exeuntes de consessu persecutorum sunt propter dei nomen dignos se iniuriis iudicatos. testimonia ergo eius exultatio eorum cordis fuit. sed propheta, ut et apostoli, licet inter multas persecutiones testimonia dei, id est testandi de eo cum exultatione cordis tamquam hereditatem retineat, tamen etiam illa dei testimonia hereditate adquisita habet, sub testibus dicta sunt. Moyses legem sub testibus dedit caelo atque terra, Esaias sub testibus arguit caelo atque terra, apostolus iam celsioribus testimoniis ut praedicator euangelicus usus est dicens: testor uobis coram deo et Christo Iesu et angelis eius. ergo testimonia sub his scripta et sub his testata et in his testata tamquam noui patrimonii heres occupat: non ex parte, sed totum. ius enim hereditatis ex solido est. etsi inter plures secundum humanam successionem hereditas diuidatur, tamen hereditas ipsa nomine heredis ex solido est.
Then follows: "I have inherited your testimonies for ever, because they are the joy of my heart." An heir, according to human custom, obtains everything of the one whose heir he is. But the prophet disdains human inheritances: he has inherited God's testimonies. It is pleasing to him if he himself becomes God's witness, because it is the joy of his heart if he testifies of God amid the wars of persecution. So we remember that the apostles rejoiced in these testimonies when, going out from the council of the persecutors, they had been judged worthy of insults for the name of God. So his testimonies were the joy of their heart. But the prophet, like the apostles, though amid many persecutions he holds God's testimonies, that is, the testimony about him, with joy of heart as an inheritance, yet also has as an acquired inheritance those testimonies of God which were spoken before witnesses. Moses gave the law before the witnesses heaven and earth; Isaiah rebuked before the witnesses heaven and earth; the apostle, as a gospel preacher, used still loftier testimonies, saying: "I charge you before God and Christ Jesus and his angels." So the testimonies written before these, and witnessed before these, and witnessed in these, he takes possession of as heir of a new patrimony: not in part, but whole. For the right of inheritance is in its entirety. Even if according to human succession an inheritance is divided among several, yet the inheritance itself, in the name of the heir, is entire.
118.14.20CSEL 22:486–487
Ac ne, quod a multis dici saepe solet, rationis aliquam habeat auctoritatem, cum adserunt proprium dei munus esse, ut quis in dei rebus atque operibus uersetur, excusantes infidelitatem suam, quod cessante erga se dei uoluntate maneant infideles: est quidem in fide manendi a deo munus, sed incipiendi a nobis origo est. et uoluntas nostra hoc proprium ex se debet, ut uelit: deus incipienti incrementum dabit, quia consummationem per se infirmitas nostra non obtinet, tamen adipiscendae consummationis est ex initio uoluntatis.: declinaui cor meum ad faciendas iustificationes tuas in propter retributionem. cor suum ipse declinat et ex humanae peccatis in dei. natura quidem et origo carnis eum detinebat, sed uoluntas et religio cor eius ex eo, in quo manebat, originis uitio ad opera declinat. et declinat in omni uitae tempore: non in definitione aliqua spatii, sed in omni uitae suae saeculo. declinat propter retributionem, certus scilicet ea fidei meritis reseruari et in his retributionem eius esse, oculus non uidit, nec auris audiuit, nec in cor hominis ascendit; quae deus his, qui diligunt eum in Christo Iesu, cui gloria est et nunc et semper in saecula saeculorum. amen.
And lest what is often said by many should have any authority of reason, when they assert that it is God's own gift that anyone is occupied in the things and works of God, excusing their unbelief on the ground that they remain unbelieving because God's will toward them is lacking: there is indeed a gift from God for remaining in faith, but the origin of beginning is from us. And our will must have this as its own from itself, that it wills; God will give increase to the one who begins, because our weakness does not attain completion by itself; yet the attaining of completion comes from the beginning of the will. "I have inclined my heart to do your justifications for ever, for the reward." He himself inclines his heart, and from the sins of human nature toward the works of God. The nature and origin of the flesh held him back, but will and religion incline his heart from the fault of origin, in which it remained, to works. And he inclines it at every time of life: not within some limit of space, but in every age of his life. He inclines it for the reward, sure, that is, that these things are reserved for the merits of faith and that his reward is in those things which eye has not seen nor ear heard nor has entered the heart of man, which God has prepared for those who love him in Christ Jesus, to whom be glory now and always for ever and ever. Amen.
Tractates 118, chapter 15
118.15.1CSEL 22:487
Praecepti euangelici doctrina ea est, ut inimicos diligamus et non solum amantibus nos amorem, sed etiam his, qui nos oderint, debeamus. ergo haec prophetae professio aduersari uidetur dominicis mandatis, ut, cum amor nobis inimicorum imperetur, ille, quod iniquos oderit, tamquam bonum opus praeferat.
The teaching of the gospel precept is that we should love our enemies, and owe love not only to those who love us but also to those who hate us. So this profession of the prophet seems to oppose the Lord's commandments, since, while love of enemies is commanded us, he puts forward as a good work that he has hated the wicked.
118.15.2CSEL 22:487–488
Sed huius ipsius dicti ratio ex ipsis euangeliis noscenda est. nam dominus, qui inimicos diligi iussit et maledicentes patrem aut matrem reos mortis esse constituit, rursum alio in loco praecepit dicens: si quis uenit ad me et non oderit patrem suum et matrem suam et uxorem et filios et fratres et sorores, adhuc etiam et animam suam, non potest meus discipulus esse. ergo haec uidentur sibi esse contraria, ut, cuius ex praecepto non solum odium in parentes, sed maledictio tantum morte sit digna, ipse rursum dicat, neminem discipulum suum esse posse, nisi qui patrem et matrem et uxorem et filios et fratres et sorores et animam suam oderit. durus hic sermo et praeceptum graue est, inpietatis necessitatem ad consummationem religionis inponere.
But the reason of this very saying must be learned from the gospels themselves. For the Lord, who commanded enemies to be loved and decreed that those who curse father or mother are guilty of death, in another place commanded again, saying: "If anyone comes to me and does not hate his father and his mother and wife and children and brothers and sisters, and even his own soul, he cannot be my disciple." So these seem contrary to one another: that he by whose precept not only hatred toward parents but even cursing alone is worthy of death should himself say again that no one can be his disciple unless he hates father and mother and wife and children and brothers and sisters and his own soul. This is a hard saying and a heavy precept, to impose the necessity of impiety for the completion of religion.
118.15.3CSEL 22:488–489
Verum nihil a deo durum, nihil impium, nihil contrarium anterioribus praeceptis iubetur. irasci autem haec carissima nobis nomina, pater scilicet ac mater et uxor et filii non possunt, quod eos praecipimur odisse, cum animam ipsam nostram odisse iubeamur. scit enim esse dominus plures tam inconsulti amoris, ut, cum persistere in martyrii gloria filios suos uideant, ut tempori cedant, rogent; ut sententiam mutent, precentur et pietatis erga eos utantur adfectu, cum anus mater et pater senex miserabiles canos filio in ipso martyrii certamine cum inuidia uoluntatis eius ostendat, hinc et uxor adsit filiorum ambitiosa comitatu, oret, ut potius sibi illisque uiuat, hinc fratres et sorores blandis nominum suorum familiaritatibus deprecentur, ipsa quoque anima inlecebris iam pridem capta uiuendi tacitis quibusdam consiliis ad coniuentiam inrepat. hoc igitur in tempore odisse nos patrem, matrem, uxorem, filios, fratres, sorores et ipsam quoque animam dominus praecepit. nam hunc eundem sermonem ita clausit, post odium uniuersorum dicens: et si quis non portat crucem suam et uenit post me, non poterit meus discipulus esse. ergo tum odio habendi sunt, cum portare nos martyrii crucem nolunt, cum sequi dominum exemplo dehortantur. honestum hoc odium et utile est, eos, qui ab amore Christi abducere conentur, odisse.
But nothing hard, nothing impious, nothing contrary to earlier precepts is commanded by God. These names most dear to us, father and mother and wife and children, cannot be angry that we are commanded to hate them, since we are commanded to hate even our own soul. For the Lord knows that there are many of such ill-advised love that, when they see their children persevering in the glory of martyrdom, they ask them to yield to the times; they beg them to change their decision and use the feeling of piety toward them, when the old mother and aged father show their pitiable white hair to their son in the very contest of martyrdom, resenting his will; when on the other side the wife stands by, attended by the appealing company of their children, and begs him rather to live for her and for them; when on the other side brothers and sisters plead with the coaxing familiarity of their names; and the soul itself too, long since captured by the allurements of living, creeps by certain silent counsels toward connivance. At this time, then, the Lord commanded us to hate father, mother, wife, children, brothers, sisters, and our very soul. For he closed this same saying thus, after the hatred of all, saying: "And whoever does not carry his cross and come after me cannot be my disciple." So they are to be held in hatred then, when they do not want us to carry the cross of martyrdom, when they dissuade us by their example from following the Lord. This hatred is honorable and useful, to hate those who try to draw us away from the love of Christ.
118.15.4CSEL 22:489
Itaque nunc propheta nihil contrarium praeceptis, quibus amare inimicos iubemur, locutus uidetur dicens: iniquos odiui. non enim inimicos suos odit, sed iniquos, id est transgressores legis. propriore istud uerbo graecitas nuncupat dicens, id est extra legem agentes. sed qui legis odit, non potest non id amare, quod odit esse neglectum; et ideo ait: et legem tuam dilexi. conuenit autem, ut, qui legem amat, eos oderit, qui legis inimici sunt.
So now the prophet seems to have said nothing contrary to the precepts by which we are commanded to love our enemies, when he says: "I have hated the wicked." For he does not hate his enemies, but the wicked, that is, transgressors of the law. The Greek names this with a more proper word, saying παρανόμους, that is, those acting outside the law. But one who hates the transgressors of the law cannot but love that which he hates to see neglected; and therefore he says: "And I have loved your law." It is fitting that one who loves the law should hate those who are enemies of the law.
118.15.5CSEL 22:489–490
Dehinc sequitur: adiutor et susceptor meus es tu, et in uerbum tuum spero. magno nobis auxilio dei opus est in tanto atque adsiduo saeculi istius proelio. non enim nobis secundum apostolum pugna est aduersus carnem et sanguinem, sed aduersus potestates et mundi potentes harum tenebrarum, aduersus spiritales nequitias in. hos ergo hostes habemus, aduersum hos adiutor deus precandus est, ut nos in suam recipiat. sed non tam timoris haec precatio debet esse quam meriti. timor enim ex trepidatione condicionis est, propheta autem in uerbo dei sperat. spes non res praesentes obtinet, sed futuras. sperat ergo, quae uerbo dei, id est dictis propheticis continentur. sperat autem uel retributiones fidei in uitam spiritalem, uel ipsum illum domini nostri, qui dei uerbum est, aduentum. spes enim ista meretur auxilium et adiutorium dei. non aliter aut nos meremur aut aliqui ante meruerunt, quam uerbum dei deum naturae nostrae carnem uel habitaturum sperasse uel, quod habitauerit, credidisse.
Then follows: "You are my helper and my upholder, and I hope in your word." We need great help from God in such a great and constant battle of this world. For, according to the apostle, our fight is not against flesh and blood, but against the powers and the mighty ones of the world of this darkness, against spiritual wickedness in the heavenly places. These, then, are the enemies we have; against these God must be prayed to as helper, that he may take us into his keeping. But this prayer ought to be not so much one of fear as of merit. For fear comes from the trembling of our condition, but the prophet hopes in God's word. Hope does not hold present things but future ones. So he hopes for what is contained in God's word, that is, in the prophetic sayings. He hopes either for the rewards of faith in the spiritual life, or for that very coming of our Lord, who is the Word of God. For this hope deserves the aid and help of God. Neither we nor any before us have deserved it otherwise than by having hoped that the Word of God, God, would dwell in the flesh of our nature, or by believing that he has dwelt in it.
118.15.6CSEL 22:490–491
Sed propheta multa in se esse meminit, quae spei suae conentur obsistere; et ideo subiecit: declinate a me maligni; et scrutabor mandata dei mei. doctrinae caelestis ratio admonet, ut dictum hoc referendum ad personam, quibus insit malignitas, existimetur. propheta enim, qui gentes docet, qui uerbum dei praedicat, iubet, uti a se uniuersi maligni declinent, quia congregatio sancta ad malitiae operarios sit indigna. et nescio quem possit excipere. omnibus enim per naturae demutabilis uoluntatem malitia adiacet, ipsisque apostolis uerbo licet iam fidei emundatis atque sanctis non abesse tamen malitiam per condicionem communis nobis originis docuit dominus dicens: si ergo uos, cum sitis mali, nostis data bona dare filiis uestris. autem est, et malos amare et bonos ad bonitatem docere secundum eum. qui uniuersos ad se potius inuitat dicens: uenite ad me omnes, qui laboratis et onerati estis, et ego reficiam. sed scit propheta plures malignitates in occulto humani cordis esse. secundum enim domini dictum de intus, caedes,, fornicationes, furta. falsitates, blasphemiae. enim sunt, quae communem hominem faciunt. huiusmodi igitur, ut a se declinent, aduersantes fidei suae postulat. obsistunt enim studiis, obsistunt spiritali; atque his per consiliorum suorum adsiduam familiaritatem se ingerentibus non uacat animo dei mandata scrutari, quia maligni uiri praesentia multum eum, qui mandata dei scrutari uelit, inpediat.
But the prophet remembers that there are many things in himself which try to stand against his hope; and therefore he added: "Turn away from me, you malicious, and I will search the commandments of my God." The reason of heavenly teaching advises that this saying be thought to refer to the person of those in whom malice is present. For the prophet, who teaches the nations, who preaches God's word, bids all the malicious turn away from him, because a holy assembly is unfit for workers of malice. And I do not know whom he could except. For malice lies close to all through the will of a changeable nature, and the Lord taught that, though the apostles were already cleansed and holy by the word of faith, malice was not absent from them because of the condition of our common origin, saying: "If then you, though you are evil, know how to give good gifts to your children." But it is God's way both to love the evil and to teach the good to goodness, after the pattern of him who rather invites all to himself, saying: "Come to me, all you who labor and are burdened, and I will refresh you." But the prophet knows that there are many malicious things in the hidden part of the human heart. For according to the Lord's saying, from within come evil thoughts, murders, sexual immorality, thefts, falsehoods, blasphemies. For these are the things that defile a man. Such things, then, opposing his faith, he asks to turn away from him. For they stand against his efforts, they stand against his spiritual progress; and while these thrust themselves on him by the constant familiarity of their counsels, his mind has no room to search God's commandments, because the presence of a malicious man greatly hinders one who wishes to search God's commandments.
118.15.7CSEL 22:491–492
Et quia dei opus est misericordia, ut in familiam eius recepti a dominatu horum liberemur, propheta orat dicens: suscipe me secundum eloquium tuum, et uiuam, et non confundas me ab exspectatione mea. propheta exspectat et sperat: nihil praesens, nihil temporarium sectatur. plures autem sunt, qui hanc exspectationem fidei nostrae arguunt et inrident dicentes talia: quid ieiunia, quid continentia, quid castitas, quid iactura patrimoniorum utilitatis adferet? ubi spes uestra est, Christiani? mors aequaliter dominatur uniuersorum: in omnium corporum naturas commune ius illi est. quin etiam uniuersis nos bonis saeculi fruimur et licentia utimur; et in quo tandem a nobis spei exspectatione praestatis? non confundi ergo se in hac exspectatione sua propheta orat, sed ut maneat confidens et fructus illius, quam exspectat, accipiat. scit enim se nondum uiuere, licet uiuat. uita enim nostra secundum apostolum absconsa in Christo est. et idcirco ait: suscipe me secundum uerbum tuum, et uiuam, quia illius et uitae exspectatione ac spe detinetur. sperat enim, sperat regnum caelorum, sperat regnum dei, sperat spiritales benedictiones in caelestibus in Christo. in hac spe, in qua non confundetur, rogat, ut suscipiatur et uiuat.
And because there is need of God's mercy, so that, received into his household, we may be freed from the dominion of these things, the prophet prays, saying: "Uphold me according to your word, and I shall live; and do not put me to shame in my expectation." The prophet waits and hopes: he pursues nothing present, nothing temporary. But there are many who reproach and mock this expectation of our faith, saying such things as: "What profit will fasts, continence, chastity, the loss of inheritances bring? Where is your hope, Christians? Death rules equally over all: it has a common right over the natures of all bodies. Indeed we enjoy all the goods of the world and use our freedom; and in what, after all, do you surpass us by the expectation of hope?" So the prophet prays not to be put to shame in this expectation of his, but to remain confident and receive the fruits of what he awaits. For he knows that he does not yet live, though he lives. For our life, according to the apostle, is hidden in Christ. And therefore he says: "Uphold me according to your word, and I shall live," because he is held by the expectation and hope of that life. For he hopes, he hopes for the kingdom of heaven, he hopes for the kingdom of God, he hopes for spiritual blessings in the heavenly places in Christ. In this hope, in which he will not be put to shame, he asks to be upheld and to live.
118.15.8CSEL 22:492
Dehinc sequitur: adiuua me, et saluus tuas semper. superius dixerat: adiutor et susceptor meus, nunc autem nominum commemoratorum rem precatur, ut, qui susceptor est, suscipiat et, qui adiutor est, adiuuet. non abesse a se adiutorium adiuuantis precatur. non orat. ne malignantes non habeat, quia per passionum patientiam fides probatur; sed, ut aduersus eos adiuuetur, orat, quia auxilium a domino semper orandum est. sed quemadmodum in superiore susceptus uiuet, ita et in hoc adiutus saluabitur. adhuc enim sibi obeunda mors est, adhuc inferi sustinendi. tunc saluabitur, cum ex corporea terrenaque natura in spiritalem gloriam transformatus nullum aduersantis inimici periculum metuat, uiuat inter electos angelos, sit paradisi incola et absorpta corruptione ex mortali inmortalis existat.
Then follows: "Help me, and I shall be saved, and I will meditate on your justifications always." Above he had said, "my helper and upholder"; but now he prays for the reality of the names he mentioned, that he who is upholder may uphold, and he who is helper may help. He prays that the help of the helper may not be absent from him. He does not pray not to have malicious men, because faith is proved through patience in sufferings; but he prays to be helped against them, because help must always be prayed for from the Lord. But as in the preceding verse, upheld, he will live, so in this one, helped, he will be saved. For he still has to meet death, still to endure the underworld. He will be saved then, when, transformed from a bodily and earthly nature into spiritual glory, he fears no danger of a hostile enemy, lives among the elect angels, dwells in paradise, and, corruption being swallowed up, becomes immortal from mortal.
118.15.9CSEL 22:492
Sed quod meditaturum se in iustitiis dei dicit et meditaturum semper, numquid non meditatur, qui et in meditatione sperauit? potest quidem et in praesens opus accipi, ut, quousque in corpore sit, semper iustificationes meditetur; sed nihilominus et in futurum sermo procedit. scit in caelo omnes angelos in meditatione dei esse. nihil enim illic otiosum, nihil iners est, omnes uirtutes caelestes in opere ministerii sui permanent. et cum nobis tunc uita angelorum uiuendum sit, potest secundum eos, qui semper operantur, nobis quoque aeterna iustificationum esse meditatio.
But when he says that he will meditate on God's justifications, and meditate always, does he not meditate now, who has hoped in meditation? It can indeed be taken of present work, that as long as he is in the body he always meditates on the justifications; but nonetheless the saying also extends into the future. He knows that in heaven all the angels are in meditation of God. For nothing there is idle, nothing inactive; all the heavenly powers remain in the work of their ministry. And since we shall then live the life of angels, meditation on the justifications can be eternal for us too, after the pattern of those who are always at work.
118.15.10CSEL 22:492–493
sequitur: spreuisti omnes discedentes a iustificationibus tuis, quia iniqua cogitatio eorum. auxilium et susceptionem ob haec propheta orat, ne cum discedentibus a iustificationibus dei et ipse spernatur. sed hic seruata ea ratio est, ut non dictum sit: spreuisti omnes peccatores, sed: spreuisti omnes discedentes. si enim peccatores deus sperneret, omnes utique sperneret, quia sine peccato nemo sit. sed spernit discedentes a se, quos apostatas uocant. neque interest, an in iustificationibus dei quis aliquando. spernendus enim a deo est, quisque discesserit, quia manentis meritum conseruat consummatio permanendi. differt uero a peccato discessio, quia peccato uenia per reseruatur, discessio uero cum ipsa discessione se damnat; hinc oritur, cum uoluntas eorum, qui discessuri sunt, est iniqua.
Then follows: "You have despised all who depart from your justifications, for their thought is wicked." The prophet prays for help and upholding for this reason, lest he too be despised with those who depart from God's justifications. But here this distinction was kept, that it was not said, "You have despised all sinners," but, "You have despised all who depart." For if God despised sinners, he would despise all, because no one is without sin. But he despises those who depart from him, whom they call apostates. Nor does it matter whether one was at some time in God's justifications. For whoever departs is to be despised by God, because it is the completion of remaining that preserves the merit of the one who remains. Departure differs from sin, because for sin pardon is reserved through repentance, but departure condemns itself by the very departure; and it arises when the will of those who are going to depart is wicked.
118.15.11CSEL 22:493–494
Dehinc sequitur: deputaui omnes peccatores, ideo dilexi iustitias tuas. semper prophetae sermo longe se et ultra communem sensum extendit. nos enim praeuaricatores eos existimamus, qui susceptam fidem et cognitionem dei adeptam relinquunt, aliud pollicitos et aliud nunc agentes. sed hic existimantur omnes peccatores; nullus excipitur, generaliter ad omnes nomen refertur. lex enim ueluti naturalis est, iniuriam nemini adferre, nihil alienum praeripere, fraude ac periurio abstinere, alieno coniugio non insidiari. nouit et hanc apostolus legem dicens: cum enim nationes, quae legem non habent, naturaliter secundum legem faciunt, tales homines legem non habentes sibi ipsi sunt lex, qui ostendunt opus legis scriptum in cordibus suis. ergo praeuaricatores existimantur, qui, quod a natura legis accipiunt, derelinquunt. furem quis deprehensum aut adulterum aut homicidam arguet lege naturae. sed si in his ipse uersetur, praeuaricator est legis.
Then follows: "I have reckoned all sinners transgressors; therefore I have loved your righteous acts." The prophet's word always stretches far and beyond common sense. For we think transgressors are those who abandon the faith they received and the knowledge of God they gained, having promised one thing and now doing another. But here all sinners are reckoned so; no one is excepted; the name is applied generally to all. For there is a law, as it were natural: to do injury to no one, to snatch nothing belonging to another, to abstain from fraud and perjury, not to plot against another's marriage. The apostle too knows this law, saying: "For when the nations, which do not have the law, do by nature what the law requires, such men, not having the law, are a law to themselves, who show the work of the law written in their hearts." So those are reckoned transgressors who abandon what they receive from the nature of law. One will convict a thief caught in the act, or an adulterer, or a murderer by the law of nature. But if he himself is engaged in these things, he is a transgressor of the law.
118.15.12CSEL 22:494
Nouit etiam, cum ait peccatores terrae. alios esse et caeli peccatores. audiamus enim prodigum filium perditum atque mortuum de peccato suo patri confitentem: peccaui, inquit, pater in caelo et coram te. quisquis caelestis doctrinae et spiritalis gratiae particeps factus in peccato demorabitur, non terrae peccator est ille, sed caeli. omnes enim credentes in se dominus noster Iesus Christus coexcitauit et collocauit in caelestibus, ex quibus qui decedet, tamquam caeli peccator arguitur. cum igitur propheta peccatores terrae esse existimet, quia naturae legem peccando transgressi sint, ob hoc ipse testimonia dei diligit. quia, cum sit decedere ex lege naturae, tamen iam sine uenia sit ex caelesti lege discessio.
He knows too, when he says "sinners of the earth," that there are others who are sinners of heaven. For let us hear the prodigal son, lost and dead, confessing his sin to his father: "I have sinned," he says, "father, against heaven and before you." Whoever, having been made a partaker of heavenly teaching and spiritual grace, lingers in sin is not a sinner of the earth but of heaven. For our Lord Jesus Christ raised up with himself all who believe in him and seated them in the heavenly places, and whoever departs from them is convicted as a sinner of heaven. So since the prophet reckons sinners of the earth as transgressors because they have transgressed the law of nature by sinning, for this reason he himself loves God's testimonies: because, while there is pardon for departing from the law of nature, departure from the heavenly law is now without pardon.
118.15.13CSEL 22:494–495
: confige de timore tuo carnes meas; a iudiciis enim tuis timui. nonae et preces prophetae sunt, ut a timore dei carnes suae configantur. sed meminit conpatiendum et commoriendum esse cum Christo his, qui conregnare cum eo uelint. et minore istud dicti uirtute latinitatis translatio elocuta est. quod enim nobiscum est confige, illic id significat, ut clauis se configat. moriendum ergo nobis est, et omnia carnis uitia configenda cruci domini sunt. morimur enim secundum cum Christo et consepelimur in baptismo. et hoc propheta quamquam in uoluntate sua habeat, tamen, ut per misericordiam dei consequatur, expostulat. configi enim ex timore dei carnes suas orat, iudicia dei metuat. timet enim aeterni iudicii sententiam, timet non cum Christo configi et commori et consepeliri, nouum se hominem, nisi uetere cum uitiis et concupiscentiis exuto, intellegens non futurum.
"Pierce my flesh with your fear; for I have feared your judgments." These are new prayers of the prophet, that his flesh be pierced by the fear of God. But he remembers that those who wish to reign with Christ must suffer with him and die with him. And the Latin translation has expressed this with less force of meaning. For what with us is "pierce," there means to fasten oneself with nails. So we must die, and all the vices of the flesh must be nailed to the Lord's cross. For according to the apostle we die with Christ and are buried with him in baptism. And though the prophet has this in his will, yet he asks to obtain it through God's mercy. For he prays that his flesh be nailed by the fear of God, because he fears God's judgments. He fears the sentence of the eternal judgment, he fears not to be nailed and to die and be buried with Christ, understanding that he will not be a new man unless the old man with his vices and desires is put off.
Tractates 118, chapter 16
118.16.1CSEL 22:495–496
Et in psalmi exordio et deinceps frequenter meminimus per singularum litterarum quasi elementa discendi doctrina nos pietatis,,, fidei et timoris institui, et ut rudem infantiam ad loquendi scientiam, quam et agendi doctrina consequitur, ipsis humanae uocis initiis erudiri: quod ex praesentibus sextae et decimae litterae octo uersibus intellegi licet. propheta enim ex persona sua uniuersos docet, quid uelle, quid agere, quid profiteri unumquemque pro conscientia infirmitatis ac naturae suae utile sit, quid etiam metui, quid caueri, quid emundari oporteat. beatus idem, qui per misericordiam dei ipse sibi et uniuersis doctor et prospector et emundator et iudex est! certe dignitati eius decentissimum est, ut, qui spiritu dei loquitur, ea, quae humanae et salutis et sunt, eloquatur.
Both at the beginning of the psalm and often afterwards we have recalled that through the elements, as it were, of the individual letters we are instructed in the teaching of piety, faith, and fear, and, like untrained infancy, trained by the very beginnings of the human voice in the knowledge of speaking, which the teaching of acting follows: this can be understood from the present eight verses of the sixteenth letter. For the prophet teaches all from his own person what it is useful for each to wish, to do, and to profess according to the awareness of his weakness and nature, and also what must be feared, guarded against, and cleansed. Blessed is he who, through God's mercy, is teacher, provider, cleanser, and judge for himself and for all! Certainly it most befits his dignity that he who speaks by the Spirit of God should speak the things that belong to human salvation and life.
118.16.2CSEL 22:496
Ait enim ita: feci iudicium et iustitiam: non tradas me nocentibus me. facit placentia deo opera et, quia facit, ne nocentibus se tradatur, orat. opus merendi antefertur, et dehinc meriti praemium postulatur. fit enim primum, quod placeat; et tum dignatio eius, cui per opus placetur, oratur. at nos nec operamur nec placemus, quin etiam impiis et inreligiosis rebus offendimus; et quia tales non, irascimur. sed dignum est contueri, qualia sint, quae propheta faciens, ne nocentibus se tradatur, orat.
For he says thus: "I have done judgment and righteousness; do not hand me over to those who harm me." He does works pleasing to God and, because he does them, prays not to be handed over to those who harm him. The work of deserving is put first, and then the reward of merit is asked for. For first what pleases is done; and then the favor of him who is pleased by the work is prayed for. But we neither work nor please, indeed we offend by impious and irreligious things; and because, being such, we are not heard, we grow angry. But it is worth observing what the things are by doing which the prophet prays not to be handed over to those who harm him.
118.16.3CSEL 22:496
Et omnia, quaecumque quis timens deum fecerit, utilia ei atque pulchra sunt. pudicitiam quis colens gloriosum ac nitens sordenti corporis sui carni lumen inuexit. contemptum uero pecuniae adsumens liberum se a terrenis dominationibus reseruauit. frugalitatem autem et parsimoniam diligens nobilitatem animae caelestis captiuam ebrietati non dereliquit. sed, quamuis magna atque praeclara sint, tamen, quia prophetae propria eique tantummodo utilia sunt, non referuntur ad meritum.
And all things whatever that one who fears God does are useful and beautiful for him. One who cultivates chastity has brought a glorious and shining light into the soiled flesh of his body. One who takes up contempt of money has kept himself free from earthly dominions. One who loves frugality and thrift has not left the nobility of the heavenly soul captive to drunkenness. But although these are great and splendid, yet, because they are the prophet's own and useful only to him, they are not counted toward this merit.
118.16.4CSEL 22:496–497
Sed quid fecit, ut non tradi se nocentibus deprecetur? iudicium scilicet et iustitiam; nihil inconsultum, nihil iniustum agens, sed primum iudicium; omnia namque ratione, modo et ueritate pertractans, ut id, quod in alterum agat, perpensum antea atque perspectum iam de consilii sententia exsequatur. non permittit autem consilio tantum suo iudicii sententiam, sed facit cum iudicio iustitiam. iudicantis autem cum consilio hoc opus maximum est, ut, quod iudicat, iustum sit. iustitia etenim est amica concordiae, uinculum, fundamentum pacis, atque humanae rationis operatio. haec itaque propheta fecit; in quibus cum opus suum sit, tamen et, quibus iudicium et iustitiam fecit, utilitas est.
But what did he do, that he prays not to be handed over to those who harm him? Judgment, namely, and righteousness: doing nothing ill-advised, nothing unjust, but first judgment; for he treats all things with reason, measure, and truth, so that what he does to another he carries out after it has first been weighed and examined, by the decision of counsel. But he does not leave the sentence of judgment to his own counsel alone, but does righteousness together with judgment. This is the greatest work of one who judges with counsel, that what he judges be just. For righteousness is the friend of concord, the bond and foundation of peace, and the working of human reason. These things the prophet did; and while the work is his, yet there is benefit also for those toward whom he did judgment and righteousness.
118.16.5CSEL 22:497–498
Postulat uero, ne nocentibus se tradatur. omnis enim, in quo peccati uoluntas est, deo uacuus est; et ubi deus non erit, illic diaboli est, qui insidians atque obsidens, ubi adeundi oportunitatem habuerit, tamquam uacuam domum occupet, quae ei, deo eam deserente, sit tradita. et propheta quidem, quia ex persona omnium, ne a deo tradatur, orat. ceterum apostolus habet iam id in se, ut peccatores diabolo tradat ipse, cum ad Corinthios de eo, qui fornicationes omnes praegressus uxorem patris sui acceperat, scribit: ego autem absens corpore, autem spiritu iam tamquam praesens eum, qui hoc fecit, congregatis uobis et meo spiritu cum uirtute domini Iesu tradere istius modi in interitum carnis, ut spiritus saluus fiat in die domini. sed licet apostolus tradat, scit tamen se in uirtute Christi et in suo spiritu traditurum. sed et in alia epistula ait de Phygello et Hermogene: quos tradidi, inquit,, ut discant. qui enim ab ecclesiae corpore respuuntur, quae Christi est corpus, tamquam peregrini et alieni a dei corpore dominatui diaboli traduntur.
He asks not to be handed over to those who harm him. For everyone in whom there is a will to sin is empty of God; and where God is not, there the devil is, who, lying in wait and besieging, when he has opportunity of approach, occupies it like an empty house which has been handed over to him because God has deserted it. And the prophet, speaking in the person of all, prays not to be handed over by God. But the apostle already has this power in himself, to hand sinners over to the devil himself, when he writes to the Corinthians about the one who, going beyond every sexual immorality, had taken his father's wife: "But I, absent in body but present in spirit, as though present, have judged him who did this, when you are gathered together with my spirit, with the power of the Lord Jesus, to hand such a one over for the destruction of the flesh, that the spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord." But though the apostle hands over, he knows that he will hand over in the power of Christ and in his own spirit. And in another letter he says of Phygelus and Hermogenes: "whom I have handed over, that they may learn." For those who are cast out of the body of the church, which is the body of Christ, are handed over to the dominion of the devil as strangers and aliens from God's body.
118.16.6CSEL 22:498
Sed propheta, ne nocentibus se tradatur, orat. adsunt enim inimicae infestaeque uirtutes, quae fidei propositum conturbent, quae timorem dei obliterent, quae in terrenas cupiditates et desideria sollicitent, quae infirmam corporis naturam quibusdam blandimentorum aculeis in uitia commoueant. nouit et apostolus hanc multitudinem dominantium uirtutum dicens: in quibus et uos aliquando ambulastis secundum principem potestatis, spiritus, qui nunc operatur in filiis. fecit ergo propheta iudicium et iustitiam; et, ne tradatur nocentibus se, rogat, et hoc modo nocentibus, cum in peccatum inpellunt, cum in gloriam inflant cum in iram accendunt, cum in odium exacerbant, cum ad lasciuiam inliciunt, cum ad auaritiam prouocant. sed cum per haec nocere properent, obtinere tamen eos, qui innocentes sunt, nisi sibi per secessionem dei traditi fuerint, non ualebunt.
But the prophet prays not to be handed over to those who harm him. For hostile and dangerous powers are at hand, which disturb the purpose of faith, which wipe out the fear of God, which solicit toward earthly desires and longings, which stir the weak nature of the body into vices by certain goads of enticement. The apostle too knows this multitude of ruling powers, saying: "In which you also once walked, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit who now works in the sons of disobedience." So the prophet did judgment and righteousness, and asks not to be handed over to those who harm him, and harm in this way: when they drive into sin, when they puff up with glory, when they kindle anger, when they embitter into hatred, when they entice to lust, when they provoke to greed. But though they hasten to harm by these things, they will not be able to take hold of the innocent unless these have been handed over to them by God's withdrawal.
118.16.7CSEL 22:498–499
: excipe me seruum tuum in bonum: non calumnientur me superbi. proficit in spe sua propheta et celsiorem iam deprecationis suae gradum scandit. qui enim orauerat, ne traderetur nocentibus se, iam, ut proprietate serui excipiatur, rogat, beatum illum in se dei dominatum cum bona susceptione sua deprecans. et non ob leuem causam. ut in bonum suscipiatur, orat, scilicet ne eum superbi calumnientur. et qui sunt superbi? nempe illi, quorum principem loquentem Esaias: dixit enim: et sapientia intellectus auferam fines gentium et uirtutes earum, et commouebo ciuitates inhabitabiles et omnem orbem terrae prehendam manu mea ut pullos et tamquam confracta oua auferam. haec superbientis uox est, diaboli scilicet, qui et deo ac domino nostro Iesu Christo ostensa terrenorum imperiorum gloria dicere ausus est: omnia haec tibi dabo, si procidens adoraueris me. non esse autem hunc solitarium, sed plures ei adesse spiritalium nequitiarum ministros per eum docemur, qui ait: discedite a me, maledicti, in ignem aeternum, quem praeparauit pater meus diabolo et angelis eius. ab horum igitur se superborum calumnia esse liberum rogat. calumniantur enim, quia, cum ipsi peccati incentiua subpeditent, calumniam nobis ante deum peccati, quod per eos gesserimus, intendunt; causam namque peccati ad crimen iniciunt et criminis inuidiam per calumniam exacerbant, scriptura in Apocalypsi calumniatorem eum esse testante.
"Receive your servant for good; let not the proud slander me." The prophet advances in his hope and now climbs a higher step of his prayer. For he who had prayed not to be handed over to those who harm him now asks to be received in the proper condition of a servant, praying for that blessed lordship of God over him with his good reception. And not for a light reason does he pray to be received for good, namely lest the proud slander him. And who are the proud? Surely those whose prince Isaiah heard speaking, for he said: "By the wisdom of my understanding I will remove the bounds of the nations and their strength, and I will shake inhabited cities, and I will take the whole world in my hand like nestlings and carry it off like broken eggs." This is the voice of one who is proud, namely the devil, who also dared to say to our God and Lord Jesus Christ, when he had shown him the glory of earthly kingdoms: "All these I will give you, if you fall down and worship me." And that he is not alone, but that many ministers of spiritual wickedness attend him, we are taught by him who says: "Depart from me, you cursed, into the eternal fire which my Father prepared for the devil and his angels." So he asks to be free from the slander of these proud ones. For they slander, because, while they themselves supply the incitements of sin, they bring against us before God the charge of the sin we have committed through them; for they turn the cause of sin into a crime and sharpen the odium of the crime through slander, as Scripture in the Apocalypse testifies that he is the slanderer.
118.16.8CSEL 22:499–500
Verum etiam nunc se extendit propheta in celsiorem profectum dicens: oculi mei defecerunt in salutare tuum et in eloquium iustitiae tuae. oculi deficiunt, cum intentus in aliquam exspectationem uisus laborat. propheta itaque animae suae oculos in dei salutare defixit. et de salutari quid intellegi oporteret, saepe tractauimus; eum scilicet esse legum, qui saluum faciet populum suum a peccatis. aliis igitur oculos suos in desideria saecularia occupantibus et in uoluptates rerum praesentium tendentibus propheta in dei salutare defixus est. et ne corporales oculos eum deficere sub hac contemplanti intentione existimaremus, non solum in salutare dei deficiunt, sed etiam in eloquium iustitise.
But even now the prophet stretches himself to higher progress, saying: "My eyes have failed for your salvation and for the word of your righteousness." The eyes fail when the sight, intent on some expectation, labors. So the prophet fixed the eyes of his soul on God's salvation. And what must be understood by "salvation" we have often treated: namely that it is Jesus, who will save his people from their sins. So while others occupy their eyes with worldly desires and strain them toward the pleasures of present things, the prophet is fixed on God's salvation. And lest we think that his bodily eyes failed under this intent contemplation, they fail not only for God's salvation but also for the word of righteousness.
118.16.9CSEL 22:500
Iusta itaque esse dei eloquia confitetur. scit esse quaedam, quae cum inperitis atque impiis iniusti eloquii habeant opinionem: cum Pharao cor ad contumaciam obduratur et pertinacia ei inreligiosae uoluntatis adfigitur; cum ex duabus adhuc in utero gentibus minori maior sit seruitura, et neutro quicquam boni promerente seruitus uni inponitur, dominatus alteri donatur; cum Adam de paradiso, ne arborem uitae contingat, expellitur; quae homines diuinae et uirtutis et bonitatis et iustitiae incapaces, dum intellegere non possunt, iniusta esse constituunt. sed prophetae huius in istius modi eloquium iustitiae oculi deficiunt, quia sciat nihil iniustum esse in his dictis dei, sed omnia aduentu salutaris dei haec eloquia et consummanda et intellegenda esse iustitiae. procedit autem per hanc intentam usque ad defectionem oculorum exspectationem, ut aliquid ultra precari audeat.
So he confesses that God's words are just. He knows that there are some which, among the ignorant and impious, have the reputation of an unjust word: when Pharaoh's heart is hardened to stubbornness and the obstinacy of an irreligious will is fixed in him; when of two nations still in the womb the elder is to serve the younger, and, though neither deserves anything good, slavery is laid on one and lordship given to the other; when Adam is driven from paradise lest he touch the tree of life. These things men incapable of divine power, goodness, and justice declare unjust, since they cannot understand them. But the eyes of this prophet fail for such a word of righteousness, because he knows that there is nothing unjust in these sayings of God, but that all these words of righteousness are to be fulfilled and understood at the coming of God's salvation. And through this intent expectation, even to the failing of his eyes, he goes on so as to dare to pray for something further.
118.16.10CSEL 22:500–501
Confessus itaque eloquium iustitiae haec subdidit: fac cum seruo tuo secundum misericordiam tuam et iustificationes tuas doce me. insolens forte uox existimaretur, quae diceret: fac cum seruo tuo. quod enim dicitur: fac, tamquam ex fiducia aliqua praesumptio est usurpata poscendi. sed non inpudenter id diceret, qui iudicium et iustitiam fecisset, qui se excipi in seruum deprecatus esset, cuius oculi in salutare dei et in eloquium iustitiae defecissent. sed ne in his quidem propheta insolens est. nam in eo ipso, quod dixit: fac, adiecit: cum seruo tuo. et quia seruitus nostra ad id ipsum, ut in seruitutis fide maneat, misericordia domini indiget, superaddidit: secundum misericordiam tuam: quia miseratione eius opus est, ut in hac seruitutis nostrae professione maneamus. inbecilla enim est per se aliquid obtinendi humana infirmitas, et hoc tantum naturae suae. officium est, ut adgregare se in familiam dei et uelit et coeperit. diuinae uero misericordiae est, ut uolentes adiuuet, incipientes confirmet, adeuntes recipiat: ex nobis autem initium est, ut illa perficiat..
So, having confessed the word of righteousness, he added this: "Deal with your servant according to your mercy, and teach me your justifications." Perhaps it would be thought an insolent voice that said, "Deal with your servant." For in saying "deal," a presumption of asking is assumed as if from some confidence. But he would not say it shamelessly who had done judgment and righteousness, who had prayed to be received as a servant, whose eyes had failed for God's salvation and the word of righteousness. But not even in these is the prophet insolent. For to that very "deal" he added "with your servant." And because our servitude needs the Lord's mercy for this very purpose, that it may remain in the faith of servitude, he added further, "according to your mercy": because there is need of his compassion that we may remain in this profession of our servitude. For human weakness is feeble by itself for obtaining anything, and this alone belongs to its nature, that it should both wish and begin to join itself to God's household. But it belongs to divine mercy to help those who wish, strengthen those who begin, receive those who approach: from us is the beginning, so that it may complete it.
118.16.11CSEL 22:501–502
Sed quid tandem ut faciat cum seruo suo secundum misericordiam suam postulat? nempe ut iustificationes suas doceat. scit in iustificationibus, quas Moyses constituere praeceptus est, magnum nescio quid et inconprehensibile humanae intellegentiae contineri. scire optat, quis iste sit, ut frequenter diximus, coemptus Hebraeus puer sex tantum annis seruiturus. legit haec quidem, sed non statim, quod legitur, et intellegitur. scire uult, quae illa seruitus sit, quae septimi anni libertas, quod sit auris foramen ex subula, si liber esse nolit, quae illa mulier Hebraei, quid illud, ut sine muliere egrediatur ipse, quid deinde secunda iustificatio, quid tertia, quid sequentes habeant futurorum sacramentorum praeformationis. non est humani ingenii haec consequi posse: caelesti opus est magistro, et plurimis fidei nostrae meritis necessarium est, ut doceri ista mereamur.
But what, after all, does he ask God to do with his servant according to his mercy? Surely, to teach him his justifications. He knows that in the justifications Moses was commanded to establish something great and incomprehensible to human understanding is contained. He wants to know, as we have often said, who that Hebrew boy is, bought to serve only six years. He reads these things, but what is read is not at once also understood. He wants to know what that servitude is, what the freedom of the seventh year, what the piercing of the ear with an awl means if he does not want to be free, who that woman of the Hebrew is, what it means that he goes out himself without the woman, then what the second justification, what the third, what the following ones hold of the prefiguring of future mysteries. It is not in human ability to grasp these things: a heavenly teacher is needed, and many merits of our faith are necessary that we may deserve to be taught them.
118.16.12CSEL 22:502
Scire autem nos conuenit in omnibus prophetae uerbis nihil humile esse, nihil commune cum ceteris, sed proprium uel ipsi sibi uel sui similibus enuntiari; latet autem sub familiaribus uerbis maxima conscientiae et fidei professio, ut nunc in eo, quod sequitur, intellegimus. ait enim: seruus tuus sum ego: da mihi intellectum, et sciam testimonia tua. nemo nostrum est, qui non uel in orationis suae prece uel in communium sermonum consuetudine seruum se dei esse fateatur. et quid magnum propheta fecit seruum se profitendo, quod nullus ausus sit denegare? sed professio ceterorum fallax est, quae, cum habeat conscientiae necessitatem, non habet tamen confessionis ueritatem. proprium hoc prophetae est, ut se seruum dei profiteatur in omni uitae genere famulatu condicionis suae fungens, siue ambulans, siue residens, siue uigilans, siue dormiens, in cibo etiam atque in ieiuniis deo aut esuriat aut satur sit et nullo in tempore a seruitutis suae officiis absistat. hic libere dicet: seruus tuus sum. at uero qui stupris dormit, latrociniis uigilat, quaestibus peregrinatur, luxui requiescit, si dicat: seruus tuus sum, profitetur quidem, quod est, sed, quod est, non agit.
We should know that in all the prophet's words there is nothing lowly, nothing common with others, but that what is declared is proper either to himself or to those like him; and under familiar words lies hidden the greatest profession of conscience and faith, as we now understand in what follows. For he says: "I am your servant; give me understanding, and I shall know your testimonies." There is none of us who does not, either in the petition of his prayer or in the habit of common speech, confess that he is God's servant. And what great thing did the prophet do in professing himself a servant, which no one has dared to deny? But the profession of the others is false, which, though it has the necessity of conscience, does not have the truth of confession. This is proper to the prophet, that he professes himself God's servant by fulfilling the service of his condition in every kind of life, whether walking or sitting, waking or sleeping, in food too and in fasts, being hungry or full for God, and at no time withdrawing from the duties of his servitude. Such a one will freely say, "I am your servant." But one who sleeps in debauchery, keeps awake for robberies, travels for gain, rests in luxury, if he says, "I am your servant," professes indeed what he is, but does not do what he is.
118.16.13CSEL 22:502–503
Propheta autem, quamuis condicionem officii sui etiam ipso famulatu suo confiteatur, tamen infirmitatis suae memor est; dari enim sibi intellectum rogat. est enim intellectus in quodam thensauro repositus spiritalium gratiarum, quem interdum sub falsae opinionis errore inprudentium mentibus diabolus insinuat. sed a deo intellegentiam propheta postulat, ne sibi inanis intellegentia subrepat, qualis gentium, qualis Iudaeorum, qualis haereticorum est: et postulat ob id, ut testimonia dei sciat, quae sub testibus tradita sunt, quae sub testibus neglecta et uiolata esse exprobrantur, quae in aduentu eius, ob quem testato dicta sunt, neglecta et fastidita uindicabuntur.
But the prophet, although he confesses the condition of his office by his very service, is nevertheless mindful of his weakness; for he asks that understanding be given him. For understanding is laid up in a kind of treasury of spiritual graces, though at times the devil insinuates it into the minds of the imprudent under the error of false opinion. But the prophet asks God for understanding, lest an empty understanding creep upon him, such as that of the nations, of the Jews, of the heretics: and he asks for it in order to know God's testimonies, which were handed down before witnesses, which are reproached as having been neglected and violated before witnesses, which, neglected and scorned, will be avenged at the coming of him for whose sake they were spoken with witnesses.
118.16.14CSEL 22:503
Et horum quidem testimoniorum tempus non ignorat propheta dicens: tempus faciendi domino: dissipa e run tin i qui legem tuam. lex populo sub testibus data est: quae cum dissipata et abiecta a Iudaeis est, tum fuit tempus domino ea, quae continebantur lege, faciendi. pollicitus enim in lege est, ut salutem gentibus daret, ut ipse sibi hominis corpus, qui secundum imaginem et similitudinem dei est factus, adsumeret, ut dissipata lege fidei gratiam donaret. temporis huius meminit per Esaiam prophetam dicens: tempore accepto exaudiui te et in die salutis auxiliatus sum tibi. apostolus uero dicti huius interpres haec scribit: ecce nunc tempus bene acceptum, ecce dies salutis; idest: dissipata lege tempus euangelicae praedicationis aduenit.
And the prophet is not ignorant of the time of these testimonies, saying: "It is time for the Lord to act; they have scattered your law." The law was given to the people before witnesses; and when it was scattered and cast away by the Jews, then it was time for the Lord to do the things that were contained in the law. For he promised in the law that he would give salvation to the nations, that he would take to himself the body of a man, who was made according to the image and likeness of God, that when the law was scattered he would give the grace of faith. He recalls this time through the prophet Isaiah, saying: "In an acceptable time I have heard you, and in the day of salvation I have helped you." The apostle, interpreter of this saying, writes this: "Behold, now is the well-accepted time; behold, now is the day of salvation": that is, when the law was scattered, the time of the gospel preaching came.
118.16.15CSEL 22:503–504
Sed illis legem dissipantibus aliud opus prophetae est. et quod sit, ex subiectis docemur. ait enim: ideo dilexi mandata tua super aurum et topazion. quod ait: ideo, ad id rettulit, quod dixerat: tempus faciendi domino, quia sciret tempus faciendi domino esse, cum legem dissipassent. ideo autem mandata dilexit, quia in his tempus faciendi domino contineretur. lex enim omnis aduentum domini testata est, ipso dicente: si crederetis Moysi, crederetis utique et mihi; de me enim ille scripsit. mandata igitur dei ob id propheta dilexit, quia in his aduentum dominicae corporationis intellegit. in eo autem, quod diligit, plus nescio quid significat. facere autem aliquid minus est quam diligere, quia plerumque id, quod agimus, necessitatis est, dilectio uero propriae uoluntatis adfectio est.
But while they scattered the law, the prophet's work is different. And what it is, we are taught from what follows. For he says: "Therefore I have loved your commandments above gold and topaz." When he says "therefore," he refers it to what he had said, "It is time for the Lord to act," because he knew that it was the time for the Lord to act when they had scattered the law. And he loved the commandments for this reason, because in them was contained the time for the Lord to act. For the whole law testified to the Lord's coming, as he himself says: "If you believed Moses, you would surely believe me also; for he wrote of me." So the prophet loved God's commandments because in them he understood the coming of the Lord's incarnation. And in saying that he loves, he signifies something more. For to do something is less than to love, because what we do is often of necessity, but love is the affection of one's own will.
118.16.16CSEL 22:504–505
Sed dilectio ea demum perfecta est, quae maxima est et quae nulli alii conparatione similium coaequatur. diligit autem mandata dei super aurum et topazion. humanus error pretiosius nihil auro et gemmis opinatur, et haec sunt, quae hominum cupiditates dominatui pretii sui et honoris subdiderunt. auro ius, honestas, pudicitia uenalis est; per gemmas uero humani corporis praestantior, ut putant, species ad naturae contumeliam expetitur. et idcirco nihil habet sexus uterque pretiosius, dum uiri posse omnia auro uolunt, mulieres uero per gemmas fieri se existimant pulchriores. praestat autem ut ceteris metallis aurum, ita et aliis lapidibus topazion. est enim ipse rarissimus et speciosissimus omnium et maximus. in Thebaidis uero loco, cui Alabastrane nomen est, reperiri solet. hunc etiam ferunt saecularium gestorum litterae in Topazon insula ab incolis eius, id est Troglodytis Arabis inuentum ad matrem regis Aegypti Ptolomaei, sub quo scripturae legis ex hebraeo in graecum translatae sunt, muneri fuisse delatum. continet autem ipse in se solus ceterarum gemmarum optimarum pretiosissimarumque speciem et in uno illo diuersissimorum colorum permixtio continetur. super hunc igitur topazion et super aurum mandata dei propheta dilexit, non terrenis se, sed caelestibus desideriis significans detineri.
But that love is perfect which is greatest and which is equalled by no other in comparison with similar things. And he loves God's commandments above gold and topaz. Human error thinks nothing more precious than gold and gems, and these are what have subjected the desires of men to the dominion of their price and honor. By gold, right, honesty, and chastity are for sale; by gems, a supposedly more excellent appearance of the human body is sought, to the insult of nature. And therefore both sexes hold nothing more precious, since men want to be able to do all things by gold, and women think they become more beautiful by gems. And as gold surpasses the other metals, so topaz surpasses other stones. For it is the rarest and most beautiful of all and the largest. It is usually found in a place in the Thebaid called Alabastrane. The writings of secular history also report that it was found on the island of Topazos by its inhabitants, the Arab Troglodytes, and brought as a gift to the mother of Ptolemy, king of Egypt, under whom the Scriptures of the law were translated from Hebrew into Greek. It alone contains in itself the appearance of the other best and most precious gems, and in that one stone a mingling of the most diverse colors is contained. Above this topaz, then, and above gold the prophet loved God's commandments, showing that he was held not by earthly but by heavenly desires.
118.16.17CSEL 22:505
Contempta autem saecularium opum cupiditate omnem a se occasionem peruersae et prauae uoluntatis recidit. diligens enim super aurum et topazion mandata dei ait: propter hoc ad omnia mandata tua dirigebar, omnem uiam iniquam odio habui. non deflectitur, non detorquetur per terrenas cupiditates, sed ad omnia dei mandata dirigitur: non occupant obuia. uidit aurum, sciuit hoc terrae esse limum; uidit gemmas, meminit esse aut montium aut maris calculos; uidit inlicem ad lasciuiam uultum, scit tamquam auibus caeli ex his sibi laqueis euadendum. resistit ergo coalitis sibi naturae suae uitiis et omnem uiam iniquitatis odit. ideo itaque et in mandatis omnibus dirigitur, quia ea super terrena desideria diligit: et dirigitur, ne eorum particeps fiat. quibus dicitur: natio praua et peruersa. et omnem uiam iniquitatis odit, ut sit in eo, qui est uia, domino scilicet nostro, qui est benedictus in saecula saeculorum. amen.
Having despised the desire for worldly wealth, he cut off from himself every occasion of a perverse and depraved will. For loving God's commandments above gold and topaz, he says: "Therefore I was directed to all your commandments; I hated every wicked way." He is not turned aside, not twisted by earthly desires, but directed to all God's commandments: the things he meets do not seize him. He saw gold; he knew it to be the mud of the earth. He saw gems; he remembered they are pebbles of mountains or sea. He saw a face enticing to lust; he knows that, like the birds of the sky, he must escape from these snares. So he resists the vices grown into his nature and hates every way of iniquity. Therefore he is directed in all the commandments, because he loves them above earthly desires; and he is directed so as not to become a partaker of those to whom it is said: "a crooked and perverse generation." And he hates every way of iniquity, so as to be in him who is the way, namely our Lord, who is blessed for ever and ever. Amen.
Tractates 118, chapter 17
118.17.1CSEL 22:505–507
Natura humani sensus ea est, ut ea mirabilia habeat, quae ante conpererit. ex conpertis enim iudicium admirationis exsistit. ceterum nemo poterit ignorata mirari. haec idcirco antea commemorata sunt! ut diligentius dicti prophetici ratio quaereretur. contra opinionem enim generalis sensus dixisse haec existimatur: mirabilia testimonia tua; ideo scrutata est anima mea. nam cum prius secundum humanam consuetudinem oporteat perscrutari et reperire, et reperta mirari: huic testimonia domini ante admirabilia sunt et ob id perscrutatione sunt digna. dicti autem huius perfecti et pulcherrimi ea ratio est testimonia etenim dei, id est ea, quae sub testibus scripta sunt, etiamsi per obseruantiam legis humanam infirmitatem ad cognitionem et famulatum dei inbuant, quippe ubi castitas, pietas, pudicitia, caritas, ueritas, innocentia, frugalitas et religio mandatur et per quasdam religionum consuetudines hostiarumque diuersitates diuini honoris officium praecipitur, in quibus cum admiratio magna sit pro peccatis oblata hostia et datum pro redemptione animae munus et agnus in sacramento paschae occisus: tamen in his plus ex futurorum spe atque doctrina admirationis continetur. haec itaque prophetae huic admirabilia sunt. sed quia per praesentem admirationem futurorum atque aeternorum bonorum exemplaribus admirabilia sunt, perscrutatur ea. non inquirit tantummodo, in quo est rerum absconditarum diligens exquisitio; sed perscrutatur etiam, per adiectionem scilicet diligentioris exquisitionis laborem suum in perscrutatione demonstrans. neque tantummodo perscrutatur, sed perscrutatur ex anima, ad uoluntatis officium animae intentione sociata.
The nature of human sense is such that it holds as wonderful the things it has learned beforehand. For the judgment of wonder arises from things learned; no one can wonder at what is unknown. These things were mentioned first so that the reason of the prophetic saying might be sought more carefully. For he is thought to have said this against the opinion of general sense: "Your testimonies are wonderful; therefore my soul has searched them." For whereas, according to human custom, one should first search and find, and then wonder at what was found, to him the Lord's testimonies are wonderful beforehand and for that reason worthy of searching. The reason of this perfect and most beautiful saying is this: God's testimonies, that is, the things written before witnesses, even though through the observance of the law they train human weakness to the knowledge and service of God, since chastity, piety, modesty, love, truth, innocence, frugality, and religion are commanded there, and the duty of divine honor is enjoined through certain customs of worship and varieties of sacrifices, in which there is great wonder at the victim offered for sins, the gift given for the redemption of the soul, and the lamb slain in the mystery of the Passover: yet in these more wonder is contained from the hope and teaching of the future. These things, then, are wonderful to this prophet. But because, through present wonder, they are wonderful as patterns of future and eternal goods, he searches them. He does not only inquire, which is a careful seeking of hidden things; but he also searches thoroughly, showing by the added prefix his labor in the more careful seeking. And he does not only search, but searches with his soul, the intent of the soul joined to the duty of the will.
118.17.2CSEL 22:507
Sequitur deinde: declaratio sermonum tuorum inluminat et intellectum dat paruulis. et hic quoque sermo forte uidetur a naturae nostrae consuetudine esse diuersus. cum enim ante intellegendum sit et sic lumine intellegentiae utendum, quia noctem ignorantiae intellegentiae adeptae lumen apellat, propheta tamen dicit declarationem uerborum dei prius inluminare et post inluminationem intellegentiam praestare. sed quae sint dei uerba, ante discendum est; et tunc inluminationis ac postea intellegentiae ratio praestanda est. uerba dei sunt, quaecumque prophetae locuti sunt. cum enim Moyses uerbis suis populo Hebraeo legis obseruantiam nuntiauerit, tamen in libro eiusdem legis ita scriptum est: et dixit deus ad Moysen: dic filiis Israhel. usus igitur est his legislator uerbis, quibus ei ut uteretur praeceptum est. ergo uerba dei sunt, quae per officium licet humani oris audita sunt. sed et magnus ille propheta ipso iudicio domini nostri Iesu Christi bene locutus, cum dixisset: audi caelum, et percipe auribus terra, ait: quoniam dominus locutus est, et post aliqua, quae querellis maximis increpabantur, dixit: os enim domini locutum est haec. haec ergo omnia dei uerba sunt.,
Then follows: "The declaration of your words enlightens and gives understanding to little ones." And this saying too perhaps seems to differ from the habit of our nature. For whereas one must first understand and then use the light of understanding, since the light of understanding gained dispels the night of ignorance, the prophet nevertheless says that the declaration of God's words first enlightens and after enlightenment gives understanding. But we must first learn what God's words are; and then the reason of enlightenment and afterwards of understanding is to be given. God's words are whatever the prophets spoke. For although Moses announced the observance of the law to the Hebrew people in his own words, yet in the book of that same law it is written thus: "And God said to Moses: Speak to the sons of Israel." So the lawgiver used those words which he was commanded to use. Therefore they are God's words, though heard through the service of a human mouth. And that great prophet too, who spoke well by the very judgment of our Lord Jesus Christ, when he had said, "Hear, O heaven, and give ear, O earth," said: "for the Lord has spoken," and after some things that were rebuked with the greatest complaints, he said: "For the mouth of the Lord has spoken these things." All these, then, are God's words.
118.17.3CSEL 22:507–508
Sed declaratio uerborum maxime necessaria est. sunt enim sub uelamine opinionis alterius praedicata, sunt secundum apostolum allegorumena, sunt conparatiuis significationibus amphibola. testis est dominus haec eadem per Esaiam ita dicta esse Iudaeis infidelibus exprobrans, dicens: audita audietis et non intellegetis. signata enim omnia sunt et per solam spiritalem doctrinam resignanda. haec enim ad Danuelum desideriorum uirum dicta sunt: uade, Daniel, quia clausi sunt signatique sermones. ait etiam Esaias: dabitur liber iste manus hominis scientis litteras et dicetur ei: lege hoc, et respondet: non possum legere, signatum est enim.
But the declaration of the words is most necessary. For they were proclaimed under the veil of another meaning; they are, according to the apostle, allegorical; they are ambiguous through comparative significations. The Lord is witness that these same things were said thus through Isaiah, reproaching the unbelieving Jews and saying: "Hearing you will hear and not understand." For all things are sealed and are to be unsealed only by spiritual teaching. For these things were said to Daniel, the man of desires: "Go, Daniel, for the words are closed and sealed." Isaiah too says: "This book will be given into the hands of a man who knows letters, and it will be said to him: Read this, and he answers: I cannot read, for it is sealed."
118.17.4CSEL 22:508–509
Sed declaratio uerborum mysticorum per euangelia praestatur, ubi legis occulta et abscondita prophetica mandata domino in corpore manente panduntur. ex quibus primum fides discitur. ubi enim ea, quae a prophetis dicta sunt, per eum rebus et operibus explentur. cum uirgo parit, cum deus uerbum est et uerbum caro fit et habitat in nobis, cum muti loquuntur, cum surdi audiunt, cum claudi incedunt, cum leprosi emundantur, cum caeci uident, cum daemoniaci curantur, cum mortui resurgunt, declaratio haec uerborum dei nostram ac naturae obscuritatem fidei luce clarificat. tunc enim intellegimus resurrectionis gloriam, iudicii potestatem, aeternitatis honorem. et intellegimus haec paruuli, uel ad innocentiam renati uel per ignorationem inperiti. hsec declaratio uerborum dei et intellegentia paruulis praestita cuius temporis aetatisque res esset, dominus ipse in euangeliis demonstrat dicens: confiteor tibi, domine caeli et terrae, quia abscondisti haec a sapientibus et prudentibus et reuelasti ea paruulis. ecce declarationis et inluminationis et intellegentiae tempus. absconsa enim usque in hos dies haec declarantur et declarata inluminant et inluminantia intellegentiam paruulis subministrant: fiuntque per hanc intellegentiam sancti spiritus iam capaces.
But the declaration of the mystical words is given through the gospels, where the hidden things of the law and the concealed prophetic commandments are opened while the Lord abides in the body. From these, first, faith is learned. For there the things spoken by the prophets are fulfilled by him in deeds and works: when a virgin gives birth, when God is the Word and the Word becomes flesh and dwells among us, when the mute speak, when the deaf hear, when the lame walk, when lepers are cleansed, when the blind see, when the possessed are healed, when the dead rise; this declaration of God's words brightens the darkness of our nature with the light of faith. For then we understand the glory of the resurrection, the power of the judgment, the honor of eternity. And we understand these things as little ones, either reborn into innocence or untaught through ignorance. Of what time and age this declaration of God's words and understanding given to little ones would be, the Lord himself shows in the gospels, saying: "I confess to you, Lord of heaven and earth, that you have hidden these things from the wise and prudent and revealed them to little ones." Behold the time of declaration, enlightenment, and understanding. For things hidden until these days are declared, and being declared they enlighten, and enlightening they supply understanding to little ones: and through this understanding they become capable of the Holy Spirit.
118.17.5CSEL 22:509–510
Denique id ipsum sequens sermo subiecit dicens: os meum aperui et adtraxi spiritum; quia mandata tua concupiscebam. non de hoc utique humani corporis ore dixit, quod per labia concluditur ac patet. nam spiritum officio narium magis quam oris haurimus. laboriosius autem aditu oris in animam transfunditur; absolutius uero per naturalem cursum famulatu atque officio narium commeat. sed os scriptura non labiorum tantum, sed et cordis solita est nuncupare. corde enim per fidem patente et desiderio ad hauriendum hiante intellegentia doctrinae caelestis accipitur. non animae hoc, sed cordis officium est. apostolus enim ait: animalis autem homo non percipit, quae sunt spiritus: stultitia enim est ei. et idem doctor gentium ait: lex enim non in tabulis lapideis scripta, sed in tabulis cordis carnalibus. hoc ergo os suum propheta pandens adtraxit spiritum; non enim ultro ingruit. expetendus est, adtrahendus est et infantium modo tamquam lac innocens hauriendum. ideo autem propheta os aperuit, quia meminerit sibi psalmo alltiudinem: dilata os tuum, et adinplebo illud, et in lege scriptum sciat: describe haec in latitudinem cordis tui; corde enim dei praedicatio, non ore suscipitur. et secundum euangelicam praedicationem uerbum dei ex corde malus abripit, quod ultra mel et fauum in ore delectat. ut enim per os in alimoniam corporis cibum sumimus. ita et per cor ad uiuificandam animam escas doctrinae caelestis accipimus, quae, nisi amplificato et patente corde adtracta quodam modo fuerint, non adibunt.
Then the following saying added this very thing, saying: "I opened my mouth and drew in the spirit, for I longed for your commandments." He certainly did not speak of this mouth of the human body which is closed and opened by the lips. For we draw breath by the service of the nostrils rather than of the mouth. It passes into the body with more labor through the entrance of the mouth, but more easily by the natural course through the service and office of the nostrils. But Scripture is accustomed to speak of a mouth not only of the lips but also of the heart. For when the heart lies open through faith and gapes with desire to drink, the understanding of heavenly teaching is received. This is not the office of the soul but of the heart. For the apostle says: "But the natural man does not perceive the things of the Spirit; for they are foolishness to him." And the same teacher of the nations says: "For the law is written not on tablets of stone, but on fleshly tablets of the heart." Opening this mouth, then, the prophet drew in the Spirit; for he does not come in of his own accord. He must be sought, must be drawn in, and must be drunk like innocent milk, in the manner of infants. And the prophet opened his mouth because he remembered that it was said to him in a psalm: "Open wide your mouth, and I will fill it," and because he knows that it is written in the law: "Write these things on the breadth of your heart"; for God's preaching is received by the heart, not by the mouth. And according to the gospel preaching, the evil one snatches from the heart the word of God, which delights in the mouth more than honey and the honeycomb. For as we take food through the mouth for the nourishment of the body, so through the heart we receive the food of heavenly teaching to give life to the soul, which will not enter unless it is in some way drawn in by an enlarged and open heart.
118.17.6CSEL 22:510
Sequitur deinde: aspice in me et miserere mei secundum iudicium diligentium nomen tuum. ad id quod dixerat: respice in me mox addidit: et miserere mei. scit enim dominum etiam in ultionem impiorum poenamque respicere. respexit enim, ut scriptum est, super castra Aegyptiorum et conligauit axes curruum eorum. et rursum: respexit dominus super Sodomam et Gomorram. respicit uero non solum ad poenam, sed etiam ad terrorem, cum dicitur: aspiciens in terram et faciens eam tremere. propheta ergo non solitarium hoc orat, ut in se deus respiciat, sed cum miseratione respiciat: neque cum miseratione tantum, sed secundum iudicium diligentium nomen eius.
Then follows: "Look upon me and have mercy on me, according to the judgment of those who love your name." To what he had said, "Look upon me," he immediately added, "and have mercy on me." For he knows that the Lord also looks for the vengeance and punishment of the impious. For he looked, as it is written, upon the camp of the Egyptians and bound the axles of their chariots. And again: "The Lord looked upon Sodom and Gomorrah." He looks not only for punishment but also for terror, when it is said: "He looks upon the earth and makes it tremble." So the prophet does not pray only this, that God look upon him, but that he look with mercy: and not only with mercy, but according to the judgment of those who love his name.
118.17.7CSEL 22:510–511
Est quidem ex bonitate dei misericordia; sed promerenda est haec a nobis studio innocentiae, ut respiciat in nos, qualiter respexit in Abraham, qualiter in Isaac, qualiter in Iacob, qualiter in Ioseph, qualiter in Iob, qualiter in Moysen. scit enim ad haec misericordiae suae opera deum solere respicere, cum dicitur: dominus de caelo respexit in terram, ut audiret gemitum uinculatorum et soluat filios interemptorum, et rursum: et respexit super filios pauperum et non spreuit deprecationem eorum. secundum ergo hoc iudicium timentium dominum orat, ut deus super se aspiciat et misereatur: ut, si ieiunantem uidet, si miserantem contuetur, si pium ac religiosum in omni opere conspiciet, tunc secundum iudicium eorum, qui diligunt nomen suum, ipse quoque dei miseratione sit dignus.
Mercy indeed comes from God's goodness; but it must be earned by us through zeal for innocence, so that he may look upon us as he looked upon Abraham, upon Isaac, upon Jacob, upon Joseph, upon Job, upon Moses. For he knows that God is accustomed to look to these works of his mercy, when it is said: "The Lord looked from heaven upon the earth, to hear the groaning of the prisoners and to set free the sons of the slain"; and again: "And he looked upon the sons of the poor and did not despise their prayer." So, according to this judgment of those who fear the Lord, he prays that God look upon him and have mercy: that if he sees him fasting, if he beholds him showing mercy, if he sees him pious and religious in every work, then, according to the judgment of those who love his name, he too may be worthy of God's mercy.
118.17.8CSEL 22:511
Dehinc sequitur: gressus meos dirige secundum eloquium tuum, et ne dominetur mei omnis iniustitia. incedit quidem propheta ex uoluntate sua iustitiae gressibus, sed scit undique sibi iniustitiae dominationes inminere. superius orauerat, ut in se deus respiceret ac misereretur secundum eos, qui diligunt nomen suum. misericordiae autem, quam orat, hunc fructum esse sentit, ut gressus sui dirigantur, non secundum saeculi uias, non secundum humanam gloriam, non secundum corporis uoluptates, sed secundum eloquia dei. si nihil inpedimenti usquam occurreret, si aduersantes sibi non undique adessent, suis ipse uiribus in ea, quae agere uellet, confirmabatur. sed ubi insidiae sunt, ubi bellum est, opus est potioris auxilio, ne in se dominetur omnis iniustitia.
Then follows: "Direct my steps according to your word, and let no iniquity have dominion over me." The prophet indeed walks by his own will in the steps of righteousness, but he knows that dominions of unrighteousness threaten him on every side. Above he had prayed that God would look upon him and have mercy according to those who love his name. He perceives that the fruit of the mercy he asks is this, that his steps be directed, not according to the ways of the world, not according to human glory, not according to the pleasures of the body, but according to God's words. If no hindrance met him anywhere, if adversaries were not present on every side, he would be strengthened by his own powers in what he wished to do. But where there are snares, where there is war, the help of one more powerful is needed, lest all iniquity have dominion over him.
118.17.9CSEL 22:511–512
Non ut a se absit, sed ne dominetur sui orat. scit per temptationes ad gloriam perueniri. meminit Abraham et peregrinationis iniuria et amittendae uxoris metu et per immolandi filii dolorem fuisse temptatum. scit Iob omni temptationum esse militia perfunctum. recolit Ioseph, cum a fratribus uenditur, cum a domini sui coniuge ad adulterium conpellitur, cum carcere poenae reseruatur, gloriam maximae fidei per haec iniustitiae temptamenta meruisse. dominationem iniustitiae propheta metuit, temptationem uero eius non recusat. dirigendos autem esse a domino gressus suos secundum eloquia sua meminit, ne iniquitas, quae temptatura sit, potestatem possit habere dominandi.
He prays not that it be absent from him, but that it not rule over him. He knows that one comes to glory through temptations. He remembers that Abraham was tempted by the injury of exile, by the fear of losing his wife, and by the grief of sacrificing his son. He knows that Job went through every campaign of temptations. He recalls that Joseph, when he was sold by his brothers, when he was pressed to adultery by his master's wife, when he was kept in prison for punishment, earned the glory of the greatest faith through these temptations of unrighteousness. The prophet fears the dominion of unrighteousness, but does not refuse its temptation. And he remembers that his steps must be directed by the Lord according to his words, lest iniquity, which is going to tempt him, be able to have the power of dominion.
118.17.10CSEL 22:512
Post quae id consequitur: redime me a calumniis hominum, et custodiam praecepta tua. humana temptatio grauis non est apostolo dicente: temptatio autem adhuc non adprehendit uos, nisi humana; sed calumnia grauis est. calumnia autem ea est, uel cum bono operi facinoris mali nomen adscribitur, uel cum specie blandiente internae malitiae uirus occulitur. neque enim eius directae maliuolentiae opus est, sed fallax et subdolum et sub specie bonae uoluntatis malitiae operatione desaeuiens. et difficile est cauere a talibus, qui sub nomine fratrum inimici sunt, sub nomine amicorum hostes sunt, sub filiorum specie parricidae sunt, sub unanimitate coniugum ineuitabile malum sunt. Abel iustum Cain scelestus per familiaritatem fratris occidit. Noe deo probatum Cham filius eius inrisit. Esau Iacob exulem esse a paterna domo fecit. ualidissimum diaboli proeliatorem Iob sola uxor eius temptauit inflectere. hunc ipsum sanctum prophetam quae calumniae hominum fefellerunt? quotiens Sauli proditus est? quotiens, quibus in locis ageret, nuntiatus est? ubique ei calumniantium insidiae adfuerunt.
After which follows: "Redeem me from the slanders of men, and I will keep your precepts." Human temptation is not heavy, as the apostle says: "No temptation has yet taken hold of you except what is human"; but slander is heavy. Slander is either when the name of an evil deed is attached to a good work, or when the poison of inner malice is hidden under a flattering appearance. For it is not the work of open ill will, but deceitful and sly, raging with the working of malice under the appearance of good will. And it is hard to guard against such people, who are enemies under the name of brothers, foes under the name of friends, parricides under the appearance of sons, an inescapable evil under the oneness of spouses. Wicked Cain killed just Abel through the familiarity of a brother. Ham his son mocked Noah, approved by God. Esau made Jacob an exile from his father's house. His wife alone tried to bend Job, the strongest fighter against the devil. What slanders of men deceived this holy prophet himself? How often was he betrayed to Saul? How often was it reported in what places he was staying? Everywhere the snares of slanderers were at hand for him.
118.17.11CSEL 22:512–513
Nouit haec dominus domesticae calumniae scandala grauissimum solere fidei excidium adferre, dicens: quod si oculus tuus dexter scandalizat te et si pes dexter aut manus scandalizat te, erue et abscide abs te. non de membris corporum haec locutus est, cum scandala nec pes nec manus posset adferre; sed de coniunctissimis nobis ac maxime necessariis membris — quia omnes unum corpus sumus in Christo — haec iubet, ne domesticis calumniis ac scandalis penes nos manentibus aliqua nobis iudicii die uitiorum labes adhaereret. ergo propheta si ab his redemptus esset, custoditurum se praecepta dei pollicetur, quia istae domesticorum omnium calumniae inpedimentum fidei frequenter adferrent.
The Lord knows that these stumbling blocks of slander at home usually bring the heaviest ruin to faith, saying: "But if your right eye causes you to stumble, and if your right foot or hand causes you to stumble, pluck it out and cut it off from you." He did not say this of the members of our bodies, since neither foot nor hand could cause stumbling; but he commands this of the members most closely joined to us and most necessary, since we are all one body in Christ, lest, while the slanders and stumbling blocks of our household remain with us, some stain of vices should cling to us on the day of judgment. So the prophet promises that if he were redeemed from these, he would keep God's precepts, because these slanders of all those of the household often brought hindrance to faith.
118.17.12CSEL 22:513–514
Dehinc sequitur: faciem tuam inlumina super seruum tuum et doce me iustificationes tuas. — uultus domini quidem est super facientes mala, ut expugnet de terra memoriam eorum, sed sicut deus respicit ad poenam, respicit et ad misericordiam; ita et uultum suum ad utrumque deflectit. sed hanc faciem domini ad inluminationem suam propheta orat. ex maiestate enim et uultu dignantis nos dei lumen accipimus, et deflexus in nos misericordiae suae uultus ad gratiam spiritalis uirtutis inradiat. uel certe cum iudicii die aderit, cum uisibilis nobis in gloria paternae maiestatis adsistet, tunc nos faciei suae lumine inluminabit. ut enim quaedam metalla atque gemmae naturae suae fulgorem in ea, quae sibi proxima erunt, refundent et aemulantem speciem ex uicinia speciei suae praestant, ut et Moyses ex contemplatione dei gloriae lumen accepit ita, ut honorem gloriae suae contemplari populus non posset: sic et propheta seruum se dei confitens illuminari orat et conformis secundum apostolum effici gloriae dei et iustificationes dei doceri, ut a se non ex parte neque per legis umbram, sed facie ad faciem et spiritali contemplatione cernatur.
Then follows: "Make your face shine upon your servant, and teach me your justifications." The face of the Lord is indeed against those who do evil, to destroy their memory from the earth; but just as God looks for punishment, he looks also for mercy; so too he turns his face to both. But the prophet prays for this face of the Lord for his enlightenment. For from the majesty and face of God, when he deigns to look on us, we receive light, and the face of his mercy turned toward us shines with the grace of spiritual power. Or certainly when he is present on the day of judgment, when he stands visible to us in the glory of the Father's majesty, then he will enlighten us with the light of his face. For as certain metals and gems pour back the brilliance of their nature onto things that are nearest them and lend a rivalling appearance from the nearness of their own, and as Moses from the contemplation of God received the light of glory so that the people could not look upon the honor of his glory: so too the prophet, confessing himself God's servant, prays to be enlightened and, according to the apostle, to be made conformed to God's glory, and to be taught God's justifications, so that they may be seen by him not in part nor through the shadow of the law, but face to face and by spiritual contemplation.
118.17.13CSEL 22:514–515
Dehinc ait: exitus aquarum transierunt oculi mei: quia non custodierunt legem tuam. conscius peccatorum ueterum ex historia ipsa docetur; licet toto se ad deum corde direxerit, tamen, quia et peccati sui dolorem psalmo anteriore et ipse iam scripserit tunc, cum Nathan propheta arguente crimen suum recognouit et fleuit, nunc quoque non desinit uerae paenitentiae lacrimis facti ueteris crimen abluere dicens: exitus aquarum transierunt oculi mei: fontes scilicet lacrimarum suarum fontes fluminum esse transgressos. haec enim paenitentiae uox est, lacrimis orare, lacrimis ingemescere et per hanc confidentiam dicere: lauabo per singulas noctes lectum meum. lacrimis stratum meum rigabo. haec uenia peccati est, fonte fletuum flare et largo lacrimarum imbre madefieri. sed seruauit cum ratione temporis et fidei iam inmobilis firmitate dicti quoque sui temperatissimi modum. de praeterito enim dixit: quia non seruauerunt legem tuam. confessio quidem criminis semper in tempore est, quia oportet peccati paenitentiam non desinere; finis autem peccati anterioris est temporis; quia uera peccati confessio est sine intermissione temporis paenitere, peccati uero paenitentia est ab eo, quod paenitendum intellexeris, destitisse. atque ob id propheta nec confiteri peccatum desinit et peccatum ex praeterito confitetur.
Then he says: "My eyes have passed the outflows of waters, because they did not keep your law." That he was conscious of old sins is taught by the history itself; though he had directed himself to God with his whole heart, yet, because he had himself already written the grief for his sin in an earlier psalm, when he recognized his crime and wept at the rebuke of the prophet Nathan, now too he does not cease to wash away the crime of the old deed with tears of true repentance, saying: "My eyes have passed the outflows of waters": that is, that the fountains of his tears have surpassed the fountains of rivers. For this is the voice of repentance, to pray with tears, to groan with tears, and through this confidence to say: "Every night I will wash my bed; I will water my couch with tears." This is the pardon of sin, to flow with a fountain of weeping and be drenched with a heavy rain of tears. But with regard to time and with the firmness of a faith now unmoved, he kept the measure of a most temperate saying. For he spoke of the past: "because they did not keep your law." The confession of crime is always in the present, because repentance for sin must not cease; but the end of sin belongs to an earlier time; because true confession of sin is to repent without any break in time, but repentance of sin is to have ceased from what you have understood must be repented of. And for this reason the prophet neither ceases to confess his sin, and confesses the sin as past.
Tractates 118, chapter 18
118.18.1CSEL 22:515
Indefessa et perseueranti fide necessarium est, ut inmobilis in nobis et inconcussa confessio sit, ne uel aliqua temporum iniuria aut persecutionum dolore commoti deuotionis studium relaxemus, sed, si quando morbi uexabunt, passiones et cruciatus corporum desaeuient, damna defetigabunt, luctus et orbitates adfligent, semper utamur hac, qua nunc propheta usus est uoce dicens: iustus es, domine, et iustum iudicium tuum. mandasti iustitiam, testimonia tua et ueritatem tuam ualde. meminerimus enim primum eum, qui uniuersorum dominus est, iustum esse, et iudicia eius recta esse. cur enim in suos iniquus sit? cur in eos, quos ipse genuit, iniustus sit? bonitatis suae inmensitas non sinit istud de eo existimari. genuit nos non ad iniuriam, genuit non ad originis nostrae naturae dolorem; si quid est, quod patimur, ex iudicio bonitatis suae accidit. uinci diabolum patientiae nostrae uirtutibus delectatur, et probari nos per luctus et dolores et damna desiderat, ut nihil in seruis suis saeculi potestas sibi esse iuris et dominationis intellegat. quaecumque iussit, iusta et testata et uera sunt cum augmento adiectionis: ualde enim uera sunt.
With unwearying and persevering faith it is necessary that our confession be unmovable and unshaken, so that we do not slacken our zeal of devotion, moved by any injury of the times or the pain of persecutions; but if ever diseases afflict us, sufferings and tortures of the body rage, losses weary us, mourning and bereavements afflict us, let us always use this voice which the prophet now uses, saying: "You are just, Lord, and your judgment is just. You have commanded righteousness, your testimonies and your truth exceedingly." For let us remember first that he who is Lord of all is just, and that his judgments are right. For why would he be unjust to his own? Why unjust to those whom he himself begot? The immensity of his goodness does not allow this to be thought of him. He begot us not for injury, he begot us not for the pain of the nature of our origin; if there is anything we suffer, it happens by the judgment of his goodness. He delights that the devil is conquered by the strength of our patience, and he desires that we be proved by mourning, pains, and losses, so that the power of the world may understand that it has no right or dominion over his servants. Whatever he commanded is just, attested, and true, with the increase of an addition: for they are exceedingly true.
118.18.2CSEL 22:515–516
Et quia rarum est horum obseruantem esse, et difficile est inconcussam fidem inter has saeculi procellas et inter haec humanorum uitiorum naufragia dirigere, quia, si quid aduersi accidat, prona in deum querella est. deum enim inter damna sua auarus accusat. deo cum inuidia fletuum suorum orbatus irascitur. deo iniustitiam, qui ad confessionis gloriam persecutionibus probatur, exprobrat. uniuersorum stultissima haec querella est, cum iniustitiae deum per inpatientiam impii doloris accusant. et idcirco propheta subiecit dicens: tabescere me fecit zelus tuus, quia obliti sunt uerborum tuorum inimici mei. dei zelo ad omnia uitia nostra et crimina exanimatur propheta. habent hanc etiam naturae humanae consuetudinem, ut, si quando eorum, quos diligimus, uoluntati aduersari aliquos uiderimus, zelo eius, cui non paretur. utamur. quantus autem nobis dolor est, cum unum ex dei populo effici uidemus saeculi ministrum et operarium diaboli et uas mortis et materiam gehennae! zelo ergo dei irascitur. quisque Christianum ieiunii die luxuriantem conuiuiis uiderit. zelo dei irascitur, qui insolentem in fratres ministrosque conspexerit. zelo dei irascitur, quisque deuersari in stupris sanctificatum iam in Christo corpus arguerit.
And because it is rare to be an observer of these things, and hard to steer an unshaken faith amid these storms of the world and these shipwrecks of human vices, since, if anything adverse happens, complaint against God comes readily: for the greedy man accuses God amid his losses; the bereaved is angry with God with the resentment of his tears; one who is proved by persecutions for the glory of confession reproaches God with injustice. This is the most foolish complaint of all, when through the impatience of impious grief they accuse God of injustice. And therefore the prophet added, saying: "Your zeal has made me waste away, because my enemies have forgotten your words." The prophet is spent with zeal for God over all our vices and crimes. Human nature too has this custom, that if ever we see some opposing the will of those we love, we feel zeal on behalf of the one who is not obeyed. And how great is our grief when we see one of God's people made a servant of the world, a worker of the devil, a vessel of death, and fuel for Gehenna! So whoever sees a Christian reveling in banquets on a fast day is angry with zeal for God. Whoever sees one insolent toward his brothers and ministers is angry with zeal for God. Whoever finds a body already sanctified in Christ dwelling in debauchery is angry with zeal for God.
118.18.3CSEL 22:516–517
Zeli huius et apostolos meminisse accepimus, cum dominus templum ingressus flagello ex funibus omnes uendentes et ementes eiecit, et eius zeli, de quo scriptum est: zelus domus tuae comedit me. efficimus enim nos interdum templum dei, aut domum negotiationis, aut speluncam latronum. templum enim dei, secundum apostolum, corpora sunt, quae in Christo sanctificata sunt. et haec eadem corpora, cum cogitamus atque agimus stupra, caedes, furta, falsitates, rapinas, speluncam latronum constituimus; aut cum saeculi negotiis et negotiationum commerciis laboramus, tunc domum dei domum negotiationis efficimus, ut, quae orationis sedis esse debebat, fiat uel latibulum latrocinantium uel domus negotiationis. hoc ergo zelo dominus, ut istius modi homines de templo eiciat, commouetur. usi sunt et hoc zelo probabiles et accepti deo uiri. nam et Phinees ob hunc zelum meruit iudicium pacis aeternae. cum enim fornicati essent filii Israhel, et dei zelo incitatus in poenam eorum fuisset, tunc ait dominus: Phinees, fili Eleazar filii Aaron, requiescit animatione anima: quia zelauit zelum meum. sanctus ille et in caelestem habitationem raptus in corpore Elias propheta ait: zelans zelaui, quia reliquerunt te filii Israhel et prophetas tuos occiderunt: et ego derelictus sum solus.
We have learned that the apostles remembered this zeal, when the Lord entered the temple and drove out all who sold and bought with a whip of cords, and that zeal of which it is written: "Zeal for your house has consumed me." For we sometimes make the temple of God either a house of trade or a den of robbers. For the temple of God, according to the apostle, is our bodies, which have been sanctified in Christ. And when we think and do debauchery, murders, thefts, falsehoods, robberies, we make these same bodies a den of robbers; or when we labor in the business of the world and the dealings of trade, then we make the house of God a house of trade, so that what should have been a seat of prayer becomes either a hiding place of robbers or a house of trade. By this zeal, then, the Lord is moved to cast such men out of the temple. Men approved and accepted by God also used this zeal. For Phinehas too, because of this zeal, deserved the covenant of eternal peace. For when the sons of Israel had committed sexual immorality and he had been roused by zeal for God to punish them, then the Lord said: "Phinehas, son of Eleazar, son of Aaron, has turned away my wrath, because he was zealous with my zeal." That holy prophet Elijah, who was caught up in the body to the heavenly dwelling, said: "I have been very zealous, because the sons of Israel have forsaken you and killed your prophets, and I am left alone."
118.18.4CSEL 22:517–518
Tenet itaque et prophetam zelus iste. uidet enim inreligiosas damni querellas, impios luctuum fletus, profanam legis dei obliuionem: et idcirco haec agentes inimici eius sunt. nullum enim religiosis uiris cum talibus esse ius amicitiae potest, quando declinandi et detestandi sint odio inreligiosorum. nam id ipsum psalmo altero docetur, cum dicitur: odientes te, domine, odiui et super inimicos tuos tabescebam: perfecto odio oderam illos. Abrahae quoque dominus dixit: qui te maledixerit, maledictus erit. et inimicus ero inimicis tuis et aduersantibus te aduersabor. si Abrahae inimici deo inimici sunt, quales nobis esse oportet, quos deo uidemus inimicos?
So this zeal holds the prophet too. For he sees the irreligious complaints over loss, the impious weeping of mourning, the profane forgetting of God's law: and therefore those who do these things are his enemies. For religious men can have no bond of friendship with such people, since the irreligious are to be avoided and detested with hatred. For this very thing is taught in another psalm, when it is said: "Those who hate you, Lord, I have hated, and I wasted away over your enemies; I hated them with a perfect hatred." The Lord also said to Abraham: "Whoever curses you will be cursed, and I will be an enemy to your enemies and oppose those who oppose you." If Abraham's enemies are God's enemies, what ought those whom we see to be God's enemies to be to us?
118.18.5CSEL 22:518
Causam deinde adfert, cur eos oderit, qui uerborum dei fuerint obliti; non enim sunt inania, non terrena, non lenis. ait enim: ignitum eloquium tuum ualde: et seruus tuus dilexit illud. non explicat proprietatem uerbi huius latina translatio. quod enim nobiscum ignitum, id graece πεπυρωμένον scribitur. πεπυρωμένον autem id significat, quod tamquam conflatum igne purgatum sit. et quaecumque metalla igne conflantur, sordem in se alienam atque inutilem non continent; totum, quidquid in his residet, uerum et perfectum et omni uitiorum contagione purgatum est, ut eloquium dei aeternorum in se bonorum fidem testans. hinc illud est, quod in euangeliis dominus ait: iota una aut apex non praeteribit ex lege, donec omnia haec fiant. uera enim omnia sunt et neque otiose neque inutiliter constituta dei uerba; sed extra omnem ambiguitatem superfluae inanitatis ignita, et ignita uehementer, ne quid illic esse, quod non perfectum ac proprium sit, existimetur. haec itaque diligit seruus eius. non solum haec agit, sed etiam diligit, quia operationi oboedientiae praestat dilectionis operatio. oboedientia enim sola plerumque terroris est; ceterum dilectio non nisi ex deuotae mentis uoluntate proficiscitur.
Then he gives the reason why he hates those who have forgotten God's words: for they are not empty, not earthly, not light. For he says: "Your word is exceedingly refined by fire, and your servant has loved it." The Latin translation does not express the proper sense of this word. For what with us is ignitum is written in Greek πεπυρωμένον. And πεπυρωμένον means what has been purified as if smelted by fire. And whatever metals are smelted by fire do not contain in themselves foreign and useless dross; all that remains in them is true and perfect and purged from every contagion of faults, so that God's word testifies in itself to the faith of eternal goods. Hence is what the Lord says in the gospels: "One iota or one stroke will not pass from the law until all these things are done." For all God's words are true and established neither idly nor uselessly; but refined by fire beyond all doubt of superfluous emptiness, and refined exceedingly, lest anything be thought to be there that is not perfect and proper. These, then, his servant loves. He not only does them but also loves them, because the work of love surpasses the work of obedience. For obedience alone is often a matter of terror; but love proceeds only from the will of a devoted mind.
118.18.6CSEL 22:518–519
Dehinc ait: adulescentior sum ego et contemptus: iustificationes tuas non sum oblitus. ex persona quidem sua propheta haec loquitur, sed conpetunt et nostri temporis populo. et quatenus id Dauid de se dixisse credatur, absolute ostenditur. Samuel enim propheta uenire ad Iesse domum a deo iussus est, ut unum ex filiis eius in regem ungueret. quo cum uenisset, adesse omnes filios Iesse iubet. uidet deinde natu maiorem, specie pulchrum, habitu et proceritate eminentem; sed responso ita monetur: ne inspexeris in pulchritudinem eius ac magnitudinem, quia non ita uidet homo, ut deus. homo enim in facie uidet, deus autem in corde. adest et secundus, adest et tertius, adsunt et omnes, quos tunc Iesse praesentes habebat: sed nullus de praesentibus exstitit, qui placeret. uerum quia propheta Samuel non mendacem sciret eum, qui se adesse iussisset, et ex his, qui praesentes erant, intellegeret nullum a deo esse dilectum, Iesse ait: numquid est tibi adhuc filius? qui respondit: est mihi modicus, quem reliqui in pastorali. hic ergo electus a sancto spiritu et unctus in regem est: et ex iuniore atque contempto gloriam et prophetae et regis accepit.
Then he says: "I am young and despised; I have not forgotten your justifications." The prophet speaks these things in his own person, but they fit the people of our time too. And how far David is believed to have said this of himself is plainly shown. For the prophet Samuel was commanded by God to come to the house of Jesse to anoint one of his sons as king. When he had come there, he bids all Jesse's sons be present. Then he sees the eldest, handsome in appearance, outstanding in bearing and height; but he is warned by this answer: "Do not look at his beauty and his stature, for man does not see as God sees. For man sees the face, but God sees the heart." The second comes, the third comes, all whom Jesse then had present come: but none of those present was found who pleased. But because the prophet Samuel knew that he who had bidden him come was not a liar, and understood that of those present none was loved by God, he said to Jesse: "Have you still another son?" He answered: "I have a little one, whom I left at the pasture." This one, then, was chosen by the Holy Spirit and anointed king; and from being younger and despised he received the glory of both prophet and king.
118.18.7CSEL 22:519–520
Ad populum uero, qui et iunior est et ante contemptus est, haec ita pertinent. erat enim in uitiis saeculi, erat in ignorantiae nocte, erat in agresti ac rustica et ruinosa terreni corporis domo. sed hic iustificationum dei non obliuiscitur, hic reprobato populo seniore iunior in hereditatem familiae eligitur. emit enim Iacob primogenita Esau, quae sibi ille tamquam moriturus inutilia existimauit. scit has populus iunior natiuitatis suae primitias aeternas nec morte intercipi posse. has igitur non obliuiscitur, quas senior et desperauit et uendidit.
But these things apply thus to the people which is both younger and was formerly despised. For it was in the vices of the world, it was in the night of ignorance, it was in the wild, rustic, and crumbling house of an earthly body. But this people does not forget God's justifications; this younger people is chosen into the inheritance of the family, the elder people being rejected. For Jacob bought Esau's birthright, which the latter thought useless to himself as one about to die. The younger people knows that these firstfruits of its birth are eternal and cannot be cut off by death. These, then, it does not forget, which the elder both despaired of and sold.
118.18.8CSEL 22:520
Denique id ipsum sequenti uersu docet: iustitia tua in aeternum, et lex tua ueritas. has iustitias non cogitauit populus ex Aegypto progressus, cui mare aruit, cui columna nubis de die, nocte autem columna ignis famulata est, cui mannam matutinam caelum subministrauit, cui uiginti septem regna cesserunt, cui Iordanis stetit aridus, cui muri Iericho ad sonum exercitus et arcae testamenti circuitum conciderunt. has dei iustitias scit populus, qui est iunior, aeternas. has, quia aeternas sciret, emit fide; has, quia moriturum se crederet senior, uendidit infidelitate. populo enim iuniori lex ueritas est. nam uere nunc ab eo circumcisio cordis per legum iteratur ad uitam, uere per mare huius saeculi transit in promissam sibi terram, uere caelestem mannam sumit aeternus. uere in Iordane laetatur renatus, uere pascham agni sanguine liberandus immolat, uere in azymis sinceritatis fermento antiquae malitiae purgatur: iam non legis ei umbra, sed ueritas est.
Then he teaches this very thing in the following verse: "Your righteousness is for ever, and your law is truth." The people that came out of Egypt did not think of these righteous acts: for whom the sea dried up, whom the pillar of cloud by day and the pillar of fire by night served, for whom heaven supplied the morning manna, to whom twenty-seven kingdoms yielded, for whom the Jordan stood dry, for whom the walls of Jericho fell at the shout of the army and the circling of the ark of the covenant. The younger people knows that these righteous acts of God are eternal. Because it knew they were eternal, it bought them by faith; the elder, because it believed itself mortal, sold them by unbelief. For to the younger people the law is truth. For now truly circumcision of the heart is repeated by it, through the law, for life; truly it crosses through the sea of this world into the land promised to it; truly, eternal, it takes the heavenly manna; truly it rejoices, reborn in the Jordan; truly, to be set free by the lamb's blood, it sacrifices the Passover; truly, in the unleavened bread of sincerity, it is purged of the leaven of old malice: for it the law is no longer a shadow but truth.
118.18.9CSEL 22:520–521
Scit autem ob hanc ueritatis confessionem multis se persecutionibus hic iunior populus urgeri. hinc enim sunt in toto orbe terrarum beata fidelium confessorum et sancta martyria. hinc plures patrimoniis spoliati, exiliis dispersi, uincti, caesi, usti, necati; sed felici semper mandatorum meditatione omnia, quaecumque ingruerunt, confirmatae fidei uirtute uicerunt. et ideo ait: tribulatio et angustise inuenerunt me: mandata autem tua meditatio mea est. urgueant licet pugnae, intententur exilia, proscriptiones adhibeantur, mortes non dico inferantur, sed cum poenarum ingeniis innouentur, uox tamen ea esse semper fidelis uiri debet: tribulatio et angustise inuenerunt me: mandata autem tua meditatio mea est. non occupante, non obliuione temporis subrepente meditationem a nobis mandatorum dei abesse conueniet. 10. Dehinc ait: aequitas testimonia tua in aeternum: intellectum da mihi eorum et uiuifica me. non contentus est dei testimonia in praesens tantum aequa et existimare et exspectare: aequitatem eorum in aeternum sperat et per superiores tribulationes et angustias obtinere ea, quae aeterna sunt, nititur. nihil aeternum esse diues ille euangelicus existimans beatitudinem praesentem suam poenali morte mutauit. aeterna autem dei testimonia Lazarus pauper exspectans et Abrahae sinu continetur et miseriam uitae laboriosae beatae quietis honore demutat. horum intellegentiam propheta orat, donum scilicet inter multa dona praecipuum spiritalium gratiarum, et per eam uiuificari se deprecatur. sicut enim nunc in praesens testimonia dei et mandata meditatur, ita exspectat aeterna; et sicut uiuit corporis uita, ita per intellectum, quem a deo acceperit, ut aeterna gloria uiuat, expostulat.
And this younger people knows that because of this confession of truth it is pressed by many persecutions. For from this come, throughout the whole world, the blessed confessions of the faithful and the holy martyrdoms. From this many were stripped of their inheritances, scattered in exile, chained, beaten, burned, killed; but by a happy and constant meditation on the commandments they conquered all that befell them by the strength of a confirmed faith. And therefore he says: "Tribulation and distress have found me; but your commandments are my meditation." Though battles press, exiles threaten, proscriptions are applied, deaths, I do not say inflicted, but renewed with ingenious punishments, yet this must always be the voice of the faithful man: "Tribulation and distress have found me; but your commandments are my meditation." It will be fitting that meditation on God's commandments never be absent from us, neither when business occupies us nor when forgetfulness creeps in with time. [10] Then he says: "Your testimonies are equity for ever; give me understanding of them, and give me life." He is not content to think and expect that God's testimonies are equitable only for the present: he hopes for their equity for ever, and through the tribulations and distresses above he strives to obtain the things that are eternal. That rich man of the gospel, thinking nothing eternal, exchanged his present happiness for a death of punishment. But poor Lazarus, awaiting God's eternal testimonies, is held in Abraham's bosom and exchanges the misery of a toilsome life for the honor of blessed rest. The prophet prays for understanding of these, the chief gift, that is, among the many gifts of spiritual graces, and through it he prays to be given life. For as he now meditates on God's testimonies and commandments in the present, so he awaits the eternal ones; and as he lives the life of the body, so through the understanding he has received from God he asks to live in eternal glory.
Tractates 118, chapter 19
118.19.1CSEL 22:521–522
Inter multa euangelicae doctrinae praecepta silentium a nobis orandi dominus exigit, ut taciti et ex secreto cordis deprecemur neque in eo uocis potius sit officium quam mentis: deo orationis nostrae secreta. quia secretorum inspector est, audiantur. ergo contrarium euangelicis institutis uidetur hoc. quod ait propheta dicens: clamaui toto corde meo, exaudi me, domine; iustificationes tuas requiro. sed scit propheta clamorem potius cordis oportere esse, non uocis, et idcirco de corde clamat. non hic elatae uocis sonus est neque corporalis auditio, sed clamor fidei, clamor mentis. usque ad dei thronum non nisu uocis, sed fidei spiritu efferendus. ille enim ad deum corde clamat, qui magna postulat. qui caelestia precatur, qui aeterna sperat, qui innocentis timoris uiuit officiis.
Among the many precepts of gospel teaching, the Lord requires of us silence in praying, that we pray silently and from the secret of the heart, and that in this the office be of the mind rather than of the voice: that the secrets of our prayer may be heard by God, because he is the inspector of secrets. So this seems contrary to the gospel ordinances, which the prophet says: "I cried with my whole heart; hear me, Lord; I will seek your justifications." But the prophet knows that the cry ought rather to be of the heart, not of the voice, and therefore he cries from the heart. This is not the sound of a raised voice nor bodily hearing, but the cry of faith, the cry of the mind, to be carried up to God's throne not by the effort of the voice but by the spirit of faith. For he cries to God with his heart who asks for great things, who prays for heavenly things, who hopes for eternal things, who lives in the duties of innocent fear.
118.19.2CSEL 22:522–523
Sic et in huius mundi exordio iustus Abel etiam peremptus magna loquitur et clamat. scriptum est enim: uox sanguinis fratris tui clamat ad me. non humilis sanctorum querella est, nec depressa fidelium oratio est. altum est, quod postulat, excelsum est, quod exspectat, clamore personum est quod precatur. urguebat Pharao infestis dei populum agminibus, mare rubrum fugae obsistebat, conclusus undique Israhel iam ad mortem uidebatur hoste proximo, mari obuio. inter haec nullam Moysi ad deum uocem fuisse scriptura testatur, stabat maestus, stabat tacens, sed secreto cordis sui personans et orationis suae fide clamans. uox enim istud diuina testatur dicens: dixit autem dominus ad Moysen: quid proclamas ad me? silebat uir ille; sed oratio fidei eius clamor ad deum est. nouit et apostolus hunc in uiris fidelibus spiritus esse clamorem, cum dicit: spiritus enim i m in cordibus nostris clamat: abba pater. penetrat hic silentii clamor usque ad aures dei, sed aures non clamorem, sed fidem audientes: fidem, quae non terrenas opes poscat, non gloriam inanem caducamque desideret, non quae moritura corporis gaudia precetur. exiguis quidem epistulas suas apostolus litteris scribit et communis haec ei elementorum atque apicum forma est, sed nouit ingentes has esse litteras suas dicens: ecce qualibus uobis litteris scripsi mea manu, magnitudinem sensuum et praeceptorum utilitatem litteris talibus conprehendens. clamat igitur propheta ex toto corde. et quia ex corde clamat, ut audiatur, orat: et auditus haec postulat, ut iustificationes dei exquirat. scit has esse occultas et latentes et umbra legis obductas. has optat inquirere, ad quas multis opus sit magnisque rebus, clamore cordis, exauditionis merito, inquisitionis officio.
So too at the beginning of this world just Abel, even when slain, speaks great things and cries out. For it is written: "The voice of your brother's blood cries to me." The complaint of the saints is not lowly, nor is the prayer of the faithful subdued. What it asks is lofty, what it awaits is high, what it prays for resounds with a cry. Pharaoh pressed God's people with hostile troops, the Red Sea blocked their flight, Israel, shut in on every side, already seemed bound for death, with the enemy near and the sea in front. Amid this Scripture testifies that Moses had no voice toward God: he stood sad, stood silent, but resounding in the secret of his heart and crying out by the faith of his prayer. For the divine voice testifies to this, saying: "And the Lord said to Moses: Why do you cry out to me?" That man was silent; but the prayer of his faith is a cry to God. The apostle too knows that this cry of the Spirit is in faithful men, when he says: "For the Spirit of his Son cries in our hearts: Abba, Father." This cry of silence penetrates to God's ears, ears that hear not the shout but the faith: faith that does not ask for earthly wealth, does not desire empty and perishable glory, does not pray for the joys of a body that will die. The apostle writes his letters in small letters, and this common form of characters and strokes is his; but he knows that these letters of his are huge, saying: "See with what letters I have written to you with my own hand," embracing the greatness of thoughts and the usefulness of precepts in such letters. So the prophet cries from his whole heart. And because he cries from the heart, he prays to be heard; and when heard he asks this, that he may seek out God's justifications. He knows that these are hidden and concealed and covered by the shadow of the law. He wishes to seek them, for which many and great things are needed: a cry of the heart, the merit of being heard, the duty of seeking.
118.19.3CSEL 22:523–524
Sed qui clamauit, ut audiretur et inquireret iustificationes dei, nunc clamat, ut saluus fiat et custodiat testimonia dei. quantae autem modestiae ordinem tenuit! non statim clamorem suum sperare ausus est proficere iniustitise salutem. prius fuit, ut auditione dignus esset; prius fuit, ut iustificationes inquireret. merenda fuit auditio, adhibenda inquisitio: et salus post ista speranda. nos uero salutem tamquam debitum postulamus et, ueluti deo sit hanc eandem praestare necesse. primis ab eo precibus oramus. atque utinam cordis clamore loqueremur! labia tantum nostra sensu peregrinante, quod nesciunt, murmurant, et corporis officium mens in res alias occupata non sequitur. propheta uero, cum post tot praecedentes antea preces, ut saluus esset, orasset, salutis ipsius stipendium docet dicens: et custodiam mandata tua. haec fidei nostrae militia est, custodire mandata et ueluti secreto fidelissimo hunc thensaurum depositi et commendati nobis praecepti reseruare.
But he who cried to be heard and to seek God's justifications now cries to be saved and to keep God's testimonies. What an order of modesty he kept! He did not at once dare to hope that his cry would obtain salvation. First came that he should be worthy of a hearing; first came that he should seek the justifications. A hearing had to be earned, seeking had to be applied, and salvation hoped for after these. But we ask for salvation as a debt, and, as though God were obliged to grant it, we pray for it from him in our first prayers. And would that we spoke with the cry of the heart! Our lips only murmur what they do not know, while our sense is wandering, and the mind, occupied with other things, does not follow the body's office. But the prophet, when after so many preceding prayers he had prayed to be saved, teaches the wage of salvation itself, saying: "And I will keep your testimonies." This is the warfare of our faith: to keep the commandments and to keep this treasure of the precept deposited and entrusted to us as in a most faithful secret place.
118.19.4CSEL 22:524
Qui uero clamauit et testimonia dei, id est sub testibus caelo ac terra et angelis scripta, custoditurum se professus est. addidit adhuc et meritum salutis obtinendae dicens: praeueni inmaturitate et clamaui, in uerba tua speraui. non exspectauit infirmam a uitiis senectutem, neque deferuescentibus longo usu luxuque aestibus frigidae aetatis tempus elegit; sed maturitatem omnem fide et religione praeuenit. uincens per continentiam iuuentutem et conprimens lasciuientes annos et senectutis maturitatem modestae et castae adulescentiae tranquillitate praeueniens. et prophetae clamor est sperantis in dei uerba, non aliquando, sed semper. finis enim nullus est spei nostrae sed in caelestes res semper extenditur et in aeterna dei promissa procedit. nullum tempus uacuum habet, nullum otiosum.
But he who cried, and professed that he would keep God's testimonies, that is, those written before the witnesses heaven and earth and the angels, added further the merit of obtaining salvation, saying: "I came before in unripeness and cried; I hoped in your words." He did not wait for an old age weakened by vices, nor choose the time of a cold age when heats had cooled through long use and luxury; but he anticipated all ripeness by faith and religion, conquering youth by continence, restraining the wanton years, and anticipating the ripeness of old age by the calm of a modest and chaste youth. And the prophet's cry is that of one hoping in God's words, not at some time, but always. For there is no end of our hope, but it stretches always to heavenly things and goes forward into God's eternal promises. It has no empty time, none idle.
118.19.5CSEL 22:524–525
Denique id sequitur: et praeuenerunt oculi mei diluculo, ut meditarer eloquia tua. qui inmaturitate clamorem praeuenerat, nunc ipsos dies meditationibus praeuenit. uigilat ille diluculo, non expectat, ut grauatos somno oculos lux infusa proturbet. uigilat ille et ipsum redeuntem lucis ortum orationibus obperitur: nunc prophetarum dictis occupatus, nunc psalmorum hymnis intentus, nunc patriarcharum et sanctorum gestis negotiosus, omne eloquium dei in omni tempore et adsiduitate meditatus.
Then follows: "And my eyes came before the dawn, that I might meditate on your words." He who had anticipated in unripeness with his cry now anticipates the days themselves with meditations. He keeps watch at dawn; he does not wait for the light to pour in and disturb eyes heavy with sleep. He keeps watch and awaits the very return of the light's rising with prayers: now occupied with the sayings of the prophets, now intent on the hymns of the psalms, now busy with the deeds of the patriarchs and saints, meditating on every word of God at all times and with persistence.
118.19.6CSEL 22:525–526
Dehinc sequitur: uocem meam exaudi secundum misericordiam tuam, domine: secundum iudicium tuum uiuifica me. discamus modestiam ex dictis prophetae, ut superiore clamore cordis, iustificationum inquisitionem, custodiam testimoniorum dei et continentiam iuuentutis et antelucanae meditationis uigilias: et per haec omnem in misericordia dei spem reponens postremo audiri uocem suam secundum misericordiam rogat, et misericordiam secundum iudicium dei postulans. nos si semel ieiunamus, satis fecisse nos arbitramur; si aliquid ex copia domesticarum facultatum inopi damus, inpleuisse nos iustitiam credimus: ieiunantes, ut aut placeamus hominibus aut corpora cibis fessa releuemus, et inter ipsa ieiunia stupra, caedes, iniurias, odia cogitantes; donantes autem exiguum nescio quid, dum pulsantem fores nostras inopem non sustinemus aut dum bonitatis famam inani et otiosa hominum opinione sectamur — et deberi nobis, ut audiamur, existimamus. sed totum a deo propheta sperat, totum ex misericordia eius expectat. in operibus quidem bonitatis totius ipse perfectus est, sed satis esse hoc sibi non putat ad salutem, nisi secundum miserationes dei et iudicia misericordiam consequatur.
Then follows: "Hear my voice according to your mercy, Lord; according to your judgment give me life." Let us learn modesty from the prophet's words: after the cry of the heart above, the seeking of justifications, the keeping of God's testimonies, the continence of youth, and the vigils of meditation before daylight, and placing through all these all his hope in God's mercy, he finally asks that his voice be heard according to mercy, and asks for mercy according to God's judgment. We, if we fast once, think we have done enough; if we give something to the needy out of the abundance of our household resources, we believe we have fulfilled righteousness: fasting either to please men or to refresh bodies wearied by food, and in the midst of the fasts thinking of debauchery, murders, injuries, hatreds; and giving some small thing, either because we cannot bear the poor man knocking at our doors, or while we pursue a reputation for goodness in the empty and idle opinion of men; and we think we are owed a hearing. But the prophet hopes for everything from God, expects everything from his mercy. He himself is perfect in all works of goodness, but he does not think this enough for salvation unless he obtains mercy according to God's compassion and judgments.
118.19.7CSEL 22:526
Numquam autem otiosus est, numquam non infestantes insectantesque proximi sunt: uita eius omnis secundum scripturae fidem in insidiis fuit. sed et quisque nunc placere deo uult. displiceat impiis necesse est. et ideo ait: adpropiauerunt persequentes me iniqui; a lege autem tua longe facti sunt. haec quidem de se, cuius infestata fuit undique uita, dixisse creditur. sed qui in psalmo hoc humanae doctrinae ordinem tenet, ad eruditionem nostram omnia temperauit, ut cognosceremus eos, qui proximi iniuriae fidelium fierent, a dei lege longe abesse. quanta enim fit in sanctos iniuriae accessio, tanta fit ex dei lege decessio. cauendum autem est, ne quando nos aduersum fratres ira commoueat, ne quando inuidia stimulet, ne quando aemulatio inritet, ut aliquid in eos inreligiosum ac fastidiosum agamus, quorum iniuriae cum adsistimus, tum a dei lege desistimus.
But he is never idle, and those who attack and pursue him are never not near: his whole life, according to the testimony of Scripture, was among snares. And whoever now wishes to please God must displease the impious. And therefore he says: "The wicked who persecute me have drawn near; but they are far from your law." He is believed to have said this of himself, whose life was attacked on every side. But he who in this psalm keeps the order of teaching for men has tempered everything for our instruction, so that we might know that those who come near to injure the faithful are far from God's law. For as great as the approach to injuring the saints is, so great is the departure from God's law. And we must take care that anger never move us against our brothers, that envy never goad us, that rivalry never provoke us to do anything irreligious or disdainful to them; for when we stand by to injure them, then we stand away from God's law.
118.19.8CSEL 22:526–527
Dehinc sequitur: prope es, domine, et omnia mandata tua ueritas est. alio in loco legimus: deus adpropians ego sum et non deus a longe, dicit dominus. non corporalibus locis deus continetur, neque finibus aut spatiis diuinae uirtutis inmensitas coartatur. adest ubique, et totus ubicumque est: non pro parte usquam est, sed in omnibus omnis est. beatus apostolus Atheniensibus philosophiae inanitate ridiculis pro contione respondens ait: non longe a nobis manentem quaerimus deum: in ipso enim uiuimus et mouemur et sumus. et spiritus dei, secundum prophetam, repleuit orbem terrarum. et rursum: nonne caelum et terram ego inpleo? dicit dominus. nihil a deo uacat, nihil indiget. ubique est modo animae corporalis, quae in membris omnibus diffusa a singulis quibusque partibus non abest. etiamsi priuata quaedam ei et regia in toto corpore sedis est, tamen in medullis, digitis, artubus infunditur. iam si corruptis aliquibus corporis membris recisione erit necesse, cum usum suum eadem membra uitiis emortua non habebunt, id, quod putre caducumque carnis est, sine detrimento animae recidetur. ipsa enim corporis nostri anima sanis et integris admixta membris est; et cum eadem fuerint putria et recidenda, non sequitur.
Then follows: "You are near, Lord, and all your commandments are truth." In another place we read: "I am a God who draws near, and not a God far off, says the Lord." God is not contained by bodily places, nor is the immensity of divine power confined by boundaries or spaces. He is present everywhere, and wholly wherever he is: he is nowhere in part, but all in all things. The blessed apostle, answering in the assembly the Athenians, ridiculous in the emptiness of their philosophy, says: "We seek a God who abides not far from us: for in him we live and move and are." And the Spirit of God, according to the prophet, has filled the world. And again: "Do I not fill heaven and earth? says the Lord." Nothing is empty of God, nothing lacks him. He is everywhere in the manner of the soul in the body, which, spread through all the members, is absent from none of its several parts. Even if it has a private and royal seat in the whole body, yet it is poured into the marrow, the fingers, the limbs. And if it becomes necessary to cut off some corrupted members of the body, since those same members, dead from disease, will have no use, what is rotten and perishing of the flesh will be cut off without loss to the soul. For the soul of our body is mingled with healthy and whole members; and when these become rotten and must be cut off, it does not go with them.
118.19.9CSEL 22:527–528
Haec quidem superflue diuinae naturae ad conparationem similitudinis conferuntur: quia inconparabile est. quidquid aeternum est, nec recipit configuratae ueritatis speciem ininitiabilis diuinitatis exceptio. sed intellegentiae nostrae istius modi coaptatur exemplar, ut per id secundum caelestium dictorum auctoritates incorporalem et inmensum deum circumscripto huic et corporali mundo intellegeremus admixtum, uitiosis uero et per opera sua emortuis non inesse. quin etiam adhuc diuinarum atque inuisibilium rerum intellectus ex contemplatione corporalium rerum naturisque sectamur. solem uidemus in quadam caeli parte, prout ei cursus est, demorantem: et certe ubique protenditur, ubique adest et, quantus per omnia est. ita ubicumque tantus infunditur. sed si clausas domorum fenestras incidet, lumen quidem illius praesto est, sed ipsa sibi lucem eius, quae obserata sunt, denegabunt.
These things indeed are brought for comparison with the divine nature superfluously, because it is beyond comparison. Whatever is eternal does not admit a figured likeness of truth, being the exception of a divinity without beginning. But such an example is fitted to our understanding, so that through it, according to the authority of the heavenly sayings, we might understand the incorporeal and immeasurable God to be mingled with this bounded and bodily world, but not present in those who are corrupt and dead through their works. Indeed, we still pursue the understanding of divine and invisible things from the contemplation of bodily things and their natures. We see the sun lingering in some part of the sky, as its course runs; and yet it certainly extends everywhere, is present everywhere, and, as great as it is through all things, so great is it poured out wherever it is. But if it falls on closed windows of houses, its light is indeed at hand, but the things that are barred will deny themselves its light.
118.19.10CSEL 22:528
In omnibus igitur uitae nostrae operibus circumspecti et ad deum patentes esse debemus; primum, ut liberis et per innocentiam patulis cordibus nostris lumen suum dignetur infundere; deinde, ut nos in diuinitatis suae sinu agere credamus neque eum abesse, cum irascimur, cum caedimus, cum contemnimus, cum maledicimus, cum inebriamur, cum libidinamur, cum diuina et humana neglegimus, maiore contumelia eius, intra quem haec agimus, peccantes.
In all the works of our life, then, we must be watchful and open toward God: first, that he may deign to pour his light into our hearts, free and open through innocence; then, that we may believe we act within the bosom of his divinity, and that he is not absent when we are angry, when we strike, when we despise, when we curse, when we get drunk, when we lust, when we neglect things divine and human, sinning with greater insult to him within whom we do these things.
118.19.11CSEL 22:528
Sed ad id etiam illud accedit, quia mandata sua ueritas est. nihil illic anceps, nihil dubium, totum ueritatis absolutione perfectum est: quae hoc maiore periculo negleguntur, quo magis ueritatis praecepto sunt constituta.
But to this is added also that his commandments are truth. Nothing there is two-sided, nothing doubtful; all is perfected in the completeness of truth: and they are neglected with all the greater danger the more they have been established by the precept of truth.
118.19.12CSEL 22:528–529
Quatenus autem id propheta cognouerit, subdidit dicens: initiis cognoui de testimoniis tuis, quia in aeternum fundasti ea. haec licet propheta de se dicat legem dei ab exordio ipse cognoscens, uniuersae aetati tamen congruunt, quae ab institutione mundi doctrinis dei sit erudita. qui enim statutam Adae uoluntatis legem meminit, qui ipsam illam Euae creationem didicerit, qui maledictionem serpentis audierit, qui clausum uitae lignum Cherubim flammeo gladio conuertibili legerit, qui occisi Abel clamantem sanguinem sciet, qui poenae et in Cain et in Lamech numerum reputet, qui translatum Enoch, qui reseruatum Noe, qui benedictionem Sem et Iaphet et maledictionem Cham scrutatus sit, qui Melchisedech sacerdotem, qui Abraham electum, Isaac promissum, Iacob praelatum, Ioseph uenditum, sanctificatum Iudam, Moysen nutritum, eruditum et post ingentia latae legis sacramenta in uerbo dei mortuum, et Iesum diuisorem promissae terrae et auctorem iteratae circumcisionis intelleget, profecto uti prophetae uoce poterit: in principio cognoui de testimoniis tuis; quia in aeternum fundasti ea. in omnium enim superius memoratorum uirorum uita atque gestis aeternorum bonorum spes continetur, et per eos ad doctrinam euangelicae praedicationis inbuimur. sed quae fundata sunt, in aedificationem futurae domus praeparantur. aedificamur enim secundum beatum Paulum super fundamentum prophetarum et apostolorum, in quibus testimonia dei fundata sunt in aeternum, ubi exstruetur caelestis illa et regia ciuitas sancta Hierusalem, quae domus angelorum frequentantium et electorum primitiuorum est, cuius fundamenta sunt uiui lapides pretiosaeque gemmae in Christo uiuentes, resurgentes, regnantes, qui est benedictus in saecula saeculorum. amen.
How far the prophet knew this he added, saying: "From the beginning I have known of your testimonies, that you have founded them for ever." Although the prophet says this of himself, knowing God's law from the beginning, yet it fits every age that has been taught by God's teachings since the founding of the world. For whoever remembers the law set for Adam's will, who has learned the creation of Eve itself, who has heard the curse of the serpent, who has read that the tree of life was closed off by the Cherubim with the flaming turning sword, who knows the crying blood of slain Abel, who reckons the number of punishments in Cain and in Lamech, who has searched out Enoch translated, Noah preserved, the blessing of Shem and Japheth and the curse of Ham, who understands Melchizedek the priest, Abraham chosen, Isaac promised, Jacob preferred, Joseph sold, Judah sanctified, Moses nourished, taught, and, after the great mysteries of the law he gave, dead at the word of God, and Joshua the divider of the promised land and the author of the second circumcision, will surely be able to use the prophet's voice: "In the beginning I have known of your testimonies, that you have founded them for ever." For in the life and deeds of all the men mentioned above the hope of eternal goods is contained, and through them we are trained for the teaching of the gospel preaching. But what has been founded is prepared for the building of a future house. For we are built, according to blessed Paul, on the foundation of the prophets and apostles, in whom God's testimonies have been founded for ever, where that heavenly and royal holy city Jerusalem will be built, which is the house of the angels who throng it and of the elect firstborn, whose foundations are living stones and precious gems, living, rising, and reigning in Christ, who is blessed for ever and ever. Amen.
Tractates 118, chapter 20
118.20.1CSEL 22:529–530
Multa quidem nobis atque magna sanctus propheta fidei confessionisque suae toto in psalmo proposuit exempla, per quae formam se ipsum ceteris credendi, agendi, intellegendi, ignorandi, sperandi, precandique constituit, euangelicum uirum perfecta legis obseruatione consumans. et quamquam omnia, quae uel diuinae uoluntati placita uel humanae spei proposita sunt. aut agat aut testetur aut speret, meminit tamen, in quo obseruantiae genere mandatorum omnium caput ac summa consistat, scitque, quid a domino suo etiam ipsis, quibus committendae claues caelorum erant, apostolis quaereretur. namque cum inter se opinionibus ac studiis dissiderent sibique singuli principatum humana contentione praesumerent, dum praestantiorem se ceteris unusquisque esse aut optat aut poscit, dominus, meriti huius ac nominis praemium unde petendum esset, ostendens ait: qui uult esse ex uobis maior, fiat omnium minimus: omnis enim, qui se humiliauerit, exaltabitur, et qui se exaltauerit. humiliabitur. in humilitate scilicet docuit omnia fidei nomina et praemia contineri. utilissimum itaque est oboedientes diuinis praeceptis omnem intra se ipsos humanae insolentiae ac petulantiae inanitatem fractam protritamque cohibere, seseque dei et magnificentia et miseratione reputata intra humilitatis modestiam continere.
The holy prophet has set before us throughout the psalm many great examples of his faith and confession, by which he has made himself a pattern for others in believing, acting, understanding, not knowing, hoping, and praying, completing the gospel man by a perfect observance of the law. And although he does, testifies to, or hopes for all the things that are either pleasing to the divine will or set before human hope, he still remembers in what kind of observance the head and sum of all the commandments consists, and he knows what was required by his Lord even of the apostles themselves, to whom the keys of heaven were to be entrusted. For when they disagreed among themselves in opinions and ambitions and each claimed the chief place for himself in human rivalry, while each either wished or demanded to be more eminent than the rest, the Lord, showing from where the reward of this merit and name was to be sought, said: "Whoever among you wishes to be greater, let him become the least of all: for everyone who humbles himself will be exalted, and whoever exalts himself will be humbled." In humility, that is, he taught that all the names and rewards of faith are contained. So it is most useful for those who obey the divine precepts to keep within themselves all the emptiness of human insolence and wantonness broken and crushed, and, considering God's magnificence and mercy, to keep themselves within the modesty of humility.
118.20.2CSEL 22:530–531
Ob quod hic nunc sanctus et rex et propheta et deo ac domino suo secundum carnem in seminis sui originem deputatus inter has saeculi infestationes ac spiritalium nequitiarum pugnas sola ac tali ad dominum precationis suae ambitione proclamat: uide humilitatem meam et eripe me: quia legem tuam non sum oblitus. non regni opes, non spiritum prophetiae, non alia aliqua humanae iactantiae nomina conspici in se, sed humilitatem precatur. non enim aduersum insectantes se armis belli resistit, nec humanae indignationis inpatiens rapit ad ultionem suam et potentiae tempus et regni. sed sciens hanc diuinae uoluntatis esse sententiam: mihi uindictam, ego retribuam, dicit dominus, non obliuiscitur legis dei in humilitate retinenda, sed eripi se ob id, quia sit humilis, deprecatur, memoriam legis dei in humilitatis conseruatione esse declarans.
For this reason this holy man, king and prophet, and counted as the origin of the seed of his God and Lord according to the flesh, amid these assaults of the world and battles of spiritual wickedness, cries out to the Lord with this alone as the aim of his prayer: "See my humility and deliver me, for I have not forgotten your law." Not the wealth of his kingdom, not the spirit of prophecy, not any other titles of human boasting does he pray to be seen in him, but his humility. For he does not resist those who pursue him with arms of war, nor, impatient with human indignation, does he seize the time of power and kingdom for his own vengeance. But knowing that this is the sentence of the divine will, "Vengeance is mine, I will repay, says the Lord," he does not forget God's law in keeping humility, but prays to be delivered for this reason, that he is humble, declaring that the remembrance of God's law lies in the preservation of humility.
118.20.3CSEL 22:531
Reseruans itaque omnia iudicio diuino et eripi se ob humilitatis meritum deposcens, qui in nullo aduersum dei constitutiones, aduersum odia humana, aduersum praesentium molestiarum patientiam moueretur nihilque in hoc nunc saeculo sibi de his iudicandum esse decerneret, consequenter haec addidit: iudica iudicium meum et redime me; propter eloquium tuum uiuifica me. magnae et securae conscientiae uox est iudicii sui iudicium postulare, ut ad id, quod statutum a se sibique conplacitum est, etiam diuinae sententiae examen exoptet. non hic aut alios aut se ipsum diiudicans corrupti sensus opinione deflectitur, neque a ueri iudicio ira aut gratia aut odio aut amore decedit, non ignarus huius euangelici mandati: quo enim iudicio iudicaueritis, iudicabitur de uobis.
So reserving all things to the divine judgment and asking to be delivered because of the merit of humility, he who was moved in nothing against God's ordinances, against human hatreds, against the endurance of present troubles, and decided that nothing about these was to be judged by him in this present age, consequently added this: "Judge my judgment and redeem me; for your word's sake give me life." It is the voice of a great and secure conscience to ask for judgment on one's own judgment, so as to desire even the examination of the divine sentence on what one has decided and approved for oneself. He, judging neither others nor himself, is not turned aside by the opinion of a corrupt mind, nor does he depart from true judgment through anger or favor or hatred or love, not ignorant of this gospel command: "For with what judgment you judge, you will be judged."
118.20.4CSEL 22:531–532
Sed ne ille quidem iudicii sui iudicium pertimescit, qui ait: ego autem non iudicaui quicquam scire me, nisi Christum Iesum et hunc crucifixum. in hac igitur iudicii sui securitate propheta tempus redemptionis exspectans redimi se et propter eloquia dei uiuificari precatur. uenumdati enim sub peccato per redemptionem et iustificationem in sanguine domini liberamur. hoc legislatio, hoc omnis spiritus prophetiae, hoc patriarcharum spes, hoc angelorum uoces. hoc toto in saeculi tempore diuini eloquii sermo testatus est: ob quod redimi ac uiuificari se deprecatur.
But not even he fears the judgment of his own judgment who says: "But I judged that I knew nothing except Christ Jesus and him crucified." In this security of his own judgment, then, the prophet, awaiting the time of redemption, prays to be redeemed and to be given life for the sake of God's words. For, sold under sin, we are set free through redemption and justification in the blood of the Lord. To this the giving of the law, to this all the spirit of prophecy, to this the hope of the patriarchs, to this the voices of angels, to this the word of the divine speech throughout the whole time of the world have testified: and for this reason he prays to be redeemed and given life.
118.20.5CSEL 22:532
Sed haec eadem eloquia dei, ut piis spebus uitam redemptionemque denuntiant, ita impiis non relinquunt. nam exspectationem prophetae haec de peccatoribus mox secuntur: longe est a peccatoribus salus, quoniam iustificationes tuas non exquisierunt non habet ueniam ignoratio uoluntatis, quia sub scientiae facultate nescire repudiatae magis quam non repertae scientiae est reatus. ob id enim longe a peccatoribus salus est, quia non exquisierunt iustificationes dei, cum utique non ob aliud consignatae litteris maneant, quam ut ad uniuersorum scientiam notionemque defluerent. sed sciens propheta, cum a peccatoribus non exquirentibus iudicia dei salus longe sit, iuxta tamen dominum esse his, qui recto sunt corde, secundum etiam illud apostoli: uos, qui eratis longe, facti estis prope, ne et ipse et ab ipso salus longe sit, cognitionem iustificationum dei expetit.
But these same words of God, as they announce life and redemption to pious hopes, so they do not leave the impious unaddressed. For after the prophet's expectation there soon follows this concerning sinners: "Salvation is far from sinners, because they have not sought your justifications." Ignorance of the will has no pardon, because when one has the means of knowledge, not knowing is the guilt of knowledge rejected rather than not found. For salvation is far from sinners for this reason, that they did not seek God's justifications, although they remain sealed in writing for no other purpose than that they might flow down to the knowledge and notice of all. But the prophet, knowing that while salvation is far from sinners who do not seek God's judgments, the Lord is near to those who are upright of heart, as the apostle also says, "You who were far off have been made near," seeks the knowledge of God's justifications, lest salvation be far from him too.
118.20.6CSEL 22:532–533
Non ignorat, quantum in his sacramentum nostrae salutis expressum sit per quasdam praefigurationum aeternarum in rebus praesentibus notiones; in Hebraeo scilicet sex tantum annis seruiente, et post hoc idem sexennii tempus et terra omni in otium relinquenda et fructibus eius etiam bestiis deputandis, in iubelaei quoque anni, id est quinquagesimi lege, per quam et laxatis pactionibus debitorum et agris omnibus ad dominorum, si qui forte uenissent, iura redeuntibus noua et caelestis rerum omnium et remissio et reformatio praenuntiatur. et quia ab his, qui ista non exquisierint, salus longe est, totus in exquirendis his propheta detentus et diuinae atque aeternae misericordiae iustificationes in speculo contemplans subiecit: miserationes tuae multae, domine, ualde: secundum iudicia tua uiuifica me. ualde itaque multae sunt miserationes dei; modum enim humanae opinionis excedunt.
He is not ignorant how much the mystery of our salvation is expressed in these through certain notions of eternal prefigurations in present things: in the Hebrew slave serving only six years, and after the same period of six years the whole land to be left in rest and its fruits given even to the beasts, and in the law of the jubilee year, that is, the fiftieth, by which, with the agreements of debtors released and all fields returning to the rights of their owners, if any had come, a new and heavenly remission and reformation of all things is foretold. And because salvation is far from those who have not sought these things, the prophet, wholly occupied in seeking them and contemplating in a mirror the justifications of divine and eternal mercy, added: "Your mercies are very many, Lord; according to your judgments give me life." God's mercies, then, are very many; for they exceed the measure of human opinion.
118.20.7CSEL 22:533
Sed confidentem in his prophetam ac se uiuificandum in dei iudiciis sperantem multorum extrinsecus odia et insectationes fatigant. uerum misericordiarum eius, quarum secundum eundem prophetam non est numerus, non inmemor a testimoniis eius non declinauit. sequitur enim: multi, qui persecuntur me et tribulant me: de testimoniis tuis non declinaui. non pellitur, non mouetur: et cum multi persequantur, ne declinat quidem.
But the hatreds and pursuits of many from outside weary the prophet, who trusts in these and hopes to be given life in God's judgments. But not forgetful of his mercies, of which, according to the same prophet, there is no number, he did not turn aside from his testimonies. For there follows: "Many are those who persecute me and afflict me; I have not turned aside from your testimonies." He is not driven off, not moved: and though many persecute him, he does not even turn aside.
118.20.8CSEL 22:533–534
Sed qui ita in mandatis dei permanet, ut ab insectantibus inpelli deflectique non possit, habet, quod se graui dolore perturbet, se etiam usque ad tabem liquescentis quodam modo animae dissoluat: cum se a testimoniis dei non declinante alii a dei timore desciscunt et susceptam legis fidem pactionemque conrumpunt. hos habet aestus, has tantum defatigationes sentit propheta, cum dicit: uidi non seruantes pactum et tabescebam: quia eloquia tua non custodierunt. consignati testamenti Israhel heres nuncupatus est et audita de monte domini uoce respondit: omnia, quaecumque dixit deus, et audiemus et faciemus. at uero ubi diis alienis adorauit, ubi omnium se scelerum uitiis contaminauit, pactum et auditae nuncupationis et professae obseruationis amisit. eloquia enim dei non custodierunt, quae se facturos auditurosque responderunt. nec noua prophetae huius super praeuaricationem populi tabes est; quippe cum et dominum ipsum ad impietatem Hierusalem inlacrimasse noscamus, et ex doctrina eadem super inpaenitentes apostolus fleat et insuper ipse. si quis scandalizetur. uratur.
But he who so remains in God's commandments that he cannot be pushed or turned aside by his pursuers has something to disturb him with heavy grief, and to dissolve him even to the wasting of a soul that in some way melts: when, while he does not turn from God's testimonies, others fall away from the fear of God and corrupt the faith and covenant of the law they had received. These are the heats he has, these the only wearinesses the prophet feels, when he says: "I saw those who did not keep the covenant, and I wasted away, because they did not keep your words." Israel was named heir of the sealed covenant and, hearing the voice of the Lord from the mountain, answered: "All things whatever God has said we will both hear and do." But when it worshipped foreign gods, when it defiled itself with the vices of every crime, it lost the covenant both of the name it had heard and of the observance it had professed. For they did not keep God's words, which they answered that they would do and hear. Nor is this prophet's wasting away over the transgression of the people new; since we know that the Lord himself wept over the impiety of Jerusalem, and from the same teaching the apostle weeps over the unrepentant and, further, burns himself if anyone is made to stumble.
118.20.9CSEL 22:534–535
Sed qui dolet super non seruantes pactum atque tabescit. mandatorum in se dei non refugit examen. dicit enim: uide. quoniam mandata tua dilexi, domine: in tua misericordia uiuifica me. parum prophetae est, per metum explere mandata, sed ea magis diligit, quia extra necessitatem timoris sit dilectionis operatio. et quamquam amor legis potior quam metus sit, non tamen ita sui fidens est, ut non magis uiuificari se per dei misericordiam deprecetur. non nunc se ille uiuere putat, sed uitam exempto hoc mortali corpore e: absorto in gloriam inmortalitatis exspectat.
But he who grieves over those who do not keep the covenant and wastes away does not shrink from the examination of God's commandments in himself. For he says: "See that I have loved your commandments, Lord; in your mercy give me life." It is too little for the prophet to fulfil the commandments through fear, but he rather loves them, because the working of love is beyond the necessity of fear. And although love of the law is better than fear, yet he is not so confident in himself that he does not rather pray to be given life through God's mercy. He does not think that he lives now, but awaits life when this mortal body has been taken away and swallowed up into the glory of immortality.
118.20.10CSEL 22:535
Scit sibi hoc iam in exordio creationis suae esse promissum, cum a deo dicitur: faciamus hominem ad imaginem et similitudinem nostram. hoc super hominem principium uocis est dei, cum ad imaginem interminatae aeternitatis originis nostra exordium conderetur. certus ergo se uita illa atque in imagine dei esse uicturum, ait: principium uerborum tuorum ueritas: in aeternum omnia iudicia iustitiae tuae. uerba dei caelo et terra praetereunte non transeunt. quaecumque de labiis eius effusa sunt, non inrita sunt. aeternae sunt iustificationes, aeterna iustitia est. principium ergo uerborum dei ueritas est; neque de se, id est de hominis creatione, ullum alium anteriorem dei scit esse sermonem quam ut secundum imaginem dei ac similitudinem fieret. haec itaque indemutandae ueritatis est constitutio: sic in principio uerborum dei ueritas est. ut nouus homo, regeneratus in Christo, uiuat deinceps secundum aeterni dei, id est caelestis Adae imaginem iam aeternus.
He knows that this was promised him already at the beginning of his creation, when it is said by God: "Let us make man in our image and likeness." This is the beginning of God's speech about man, when the beginning of our origin was founded after the image of unbounded eternity. So, sure that he will live that life and in the image of God, he says: "The beginning of your words is truth; all the judgments of your righteousness are for ever." God's words do not pass away when heaven and earth pass away. Whatever has poured from his lips is not in vain. His justifications are eternal, his righteousness is eternal. So the beginning of God's words is truth; and he knows of no earlier word of God about himself, that is, about the creation of man, than that he should be made according to the image and likeness of God. This, then, is the decree of unchangeable truth; thus truth is in the beginning of God's words, that the new man, reborn in Christ, may live henceforth according to the image of the eternal God, that is, of the heavenly Adam, now eternal.
Tractates 118, chapter 21
118.21.1CSEL 22:535–536
Grauia quidem propheta Dauid et regis Saul et principum populi odia insectationesque sustinuit, quia piae conscientiae constantiam ferre impietas professa non potuit. sed conformans euangelicum deo atque apostolicum uirum non ignarus est euangelici sermonis, quo ait: tradent enim uos et flagellabunt in synagogis, et stabitis ante reges et potestates in testimonium illis et gentibus. quin etiam constantiam praedicationis insinuans et confessionis gloriam docens ante eos fuerat adhortatus dicens: omnis, qui confitebitur me coram hominibus, et ego confitebor eum coram patre meo, qui est in caelis: qui autem negauerit me coram hominibus, et ego negabo eum coram patre meo, qui in caelis est. siue igitur dedicatus ex lege, siue etiam in euangelii gloriam praeparatus, qui neque Saul populoque eius causam insectandi se reliquisset et per multa principum et gentium odia sciret caelorum regnum saeculo nuntiandum, confidenter haec deo loquitur: principes persecuti sunt me gratis: et a uerbis tuis formidauit cor meum. metuit enim negari se, si negaret.
The prophet David indeed endured heavy hatreds and pursuits from King Saul and the princes of the people, because impiety, once declared, could not bear the steadfastness of a pious conscience. But shaping the gospel and apostolic man for God, he is not ignorant of the gospel saying in which he says: "For they will hand you over and scourge you in the synagogues, and you will stand before kings and authorities as a testimony to them and to the nations." Indeed, instilling the steadfastness of preaching and teaching the glory of confession, he had exhorted them before, saying: "Everyone who confesses me before men, I too will confess him before my Father who is in heaven; but whoever denies me before men, I too will deny him before my Father who is in heaven." So, whether dedicated from the law or prepared for the glory of the gospel, he who had given neither Saul nor his people any cause to pursue him, and knew that the kingdom of heaven was to be announced to the world through many hatreds of princes and nations, speaks these things to God confidently: "Princes have persecuted me without cause, and my heart has feared your words." For he feared to be denied, if he denied.
118.21.2CSEL 22:536–537
Sed cum beatae huius insectationis praemia non ignoret domino dicente: beati estis, cum uos persequentur et dicent omne malum aduersum uos propter iustitiam; gaudete et exultate, quoniam mercis uestra copiosa est in caelo, post principum odia formidinem uerborum dei ita consequentibus temperauit: laetabor ego super eloquia tua, sicut qui inuenit spolia multa. fuit ergo formidinis, ne persecutionibus principum aut indigne subderetur aut cederet, quia et causam odiorum praebuisse non sancti est, et dei gratiam metu saeculi amisisse sine uenia sit. sed spolia inuenisse uictoris est: certe ea ex se praebuisse iam uicti est. cum his itaque insectationibus propheta non frangitur et odia principum fide uincit, refert quaedam impietatis spolia de uictis. scit enim secundum euangelia ligatum esse in domo sua fortem et armis suae potestatis exutum diripienda iam de se fidelibus spolia praebuisse. laetatur ergo nunc in eloquiis dei, tamquam qui multa spolia inueniat, cum fracta impiorum potestate et uictor fide permanens omnibus eos armis seu impietatis seu crudelitatis exuerit.
But since he is not ignorant of the rewards of this blessed persecution, the Lord saying, "Blessed are you when they persecute you and say every evil against you for righteousness' sake; rejoice and be glad, for your reward is abundant in heaven," after the hatred of princes he tempered his fear of God's words with what follows: "I will rejoice over your words, as one who finds much spoil." So his fear was lest he be unworthily subjected to the persecutions of princes or yield to them, because it is not the part of a holy man to have given cause for hatred, and to have lost God's grace through fear of the world would be without pardon. But to have found spoils belongs to the victor; certainly to have yielded them from oneself belongs to one already conquered. So since the prophet is not broken by these persecutions and conquers the hatred of princes by faith, he brings back certain spoils of impiety from the conquered. For he knows, according to the gospels, that the strong man was bound in his own house and, stripped of the arms of his power, has yielded spoils from himself to be plundered by the faithful. So he now rejoices in God's words, as one who finds much spoil, since, the power of the impious broken and he himself remaining a victor by faith, he has stripped them of all their arms, whether of impiety or of cruelty.
118.21.3CSEL 22:537
Sed huius laetitiae adfectus non inest, nisi et in diuinae legis dilectione et in exsecratione iniquitatis, quia neque defugere quisquam nisi quod odit optabit neque nisi quod diligit obtinere nitetur. laetatus ergo, tamquam super spolia multa, subiecit: iniquitatem odio habui et abominatus sum; legem autem tuam dilexi. iniquitatem ergo odit et diligit dei legem.
But the feeling of this joy is not present except in love of the divine law and in loathing of iniquity, because no one will wish to flee except what he hates, nor strive to obtain except what he loves. So, having rejoiced as over much spoil, he added: "I have hated and abhorred iniquity; but I have loved your law." So he hates iniquity and loves God's law.
118.21.4CSEL 22:537–538
Sed diligens dei legem non in his tantum, quae per oboedientiam legis explentur, intentus est: ad aliquid autem se aliud necesse est per opus legis extendat. et quo praeterea in officio sit, audiamus: septies in die laudem dixi tibi super iudicia iustitiae tuae. sanctus propheta primum, quod agit, diligit, opus scilicet legis, quia uitiorum omnium et usus reciditur et uoluntas. sed postea iudicia iustitiae dei laudat. haec enim, ut saepe admonuimus, plus significant, quam agant, dum gesta ipsa notionem nobis aeternae dispositionis insinuant: ut sabbati requies, ut Hebraeus puer, ut terra otiatura, ut annus quinquagesimus sub imaginis sacramentorum momentis intelleguntur. hoc ergo in die septies laudatur.
But one who loves God's law is not intent only on the things that are fulfilled by obedience to the law; he must stretch himself through the work of the law to something else. And let us hear in what duty he is besides: "Seven times a day I have spoken praise to you for the judgments of your righteousness." The holy prophet first loves what he does, namely the work of the law, because both the practice and the will of all vices are cut off. But afterwards he praises the judgments of God's righteousness. For these, as we have often noted, signify more than they do, while the deeds themselves instil in us the notion of the eternal plan: as the rest of the Sabbath, as the Hebrew boy, as the land that is to lie fallow, as the fiftieth year are understood under the moments of an image of mysteries. This, then, is praised seven times a day.
118.21.5CSEL 22:538
Ac non ambiguum est, cur laudis hic numerus sit. haec enim eadem uel in die uel in puero uel in terra uel in anno atque annis sub sanctificatione huius numeri continentur, cum usque ad illam quinquagesimae aeternam requiem, quod est sabbata sabbatorum, septenus numerus expleatur. multa autem de numeri huius sanctificatione sunt cognita, ut ipsa dierum constitutio, ut angelorum throno dei adstantium electio, ut spiritalium potestatum et requiescentium gratiarum in domino plenitudo. certe iudicia iustitiae dei hoc in numero laudari a propheta conuenit, per quem et in quo earundem iustificationum uirtus et constitutio continetur.
And it is not doubtful why this is the number of praise. For these same things, whether in the day or in the boy or in the land or in the year and years, are contained under the sanctification of this number, since the number seven is completed up to that eternal rest of the fiftieth, which is the Sabbath of Sabbaths. And much is known about the sanctification of this number, such as the very arrangement of the days, such as the choice of the angels standing before the throne of God, such as the fullness of the spiritual powers and of the graces resting on the Lord. Certainly it is fitting that the judgments of God's righteousness be praised by the prophet in this number, through which and in which the force and arrangement of those same justifications is contained.
118.21.6CSEL 22:538–539
Non alius autem nunc praedicationis propheticae ordo est, quam fidei. nam et tolerantia persecutionum et formido uerborum et laetitia eloquii et odium iniquitatis et amor legis et laudatio iustitiae et omne omnino, si quod aliud in lege mandatum est in huius tantum praecepti obseruatione concluditur: diliges proximum tuum sicut te ipsum. hoc holocaustis, hoc sacrificiis omnibus maius est, unum atque idem sibi meminisse cum alio corpus esse, qui Christi est. et ut corpus suum, id est ut se ipsum, amare, qui proximus sit. sequitur enim: pax multa diligentibus nomen tuum, et non est illis scandalum. apostolus non quae sua sunt, sed quae aliorum cogitans carne se abstenturum in saeculum, ne fratrem scandalizet, professus est. adeo perfectae caritatis et pacis tenuit adfectum, ut ab ipso uitae communis usu, dummodo causam offensionis abscideret, temperaret. pax ergo retinenda est, et non quod unicuique, sed quod uniuersitati congruat, expetendum est, quia secundum euangelium utilius sit in uitam non uenisse quam scandalum minimis intulisse.
The order of the prophetic preaching is now no other than that of faith. For the endurance of persecutions, the fear of the words, joy in the word, hatred of iniquity, love of the law, the praise of righteousness, and absolutely everything else commanded in the law is summed up in the observance of this one precept: "You shall love your neighbor as yourself." This is greater than all whole burnt offerings and sacrifices: to remember that one is one and the same body with another, which is Christ's, and to love one's neighbor as one's own body, that is, as oneself. For there follows: "Great peace to those who love your name, and there is no stumbling block for them." The apostle, thinking not of his own things but of others', professed that he would abstain from meat for ever lest he make his brother stumble. He held so fully the feeling of perfect love and peace that he restrained himself even from the use of common life, so long as he might cut off a cause of offense. Peace, then, must be kept, and what suits not each one but the whole must be sought, because according to the gospel it would be better not to have come into life than to have caused one of the little ones to stumble.
118.21.7CSEL 22:539
In his itaque pacis caritatisque praeceptis manens propheta, euangelicae spei desiderio detentus est. scit enim, in quo uel quis finis sit legis, cum ait: exspectabam salutarem tuum, domine, et mandata tua feci. salutaris Iesus est. hoc enuntiatio ex hebraeo nominis, hoc ad Ioseph angelus est locutus, hoc Simeon exinde in pace remittendus agnouit, hoc reddita nobis per eum salus edocet. in eo autem mandata dei se profitetur fecisse, quod salutare domini exspectet, declarans omnia legis mandata aduentu dei unigeniti contineri.
Remaining, then, in these precepts of peace and love, the prophet is held by desire for the gospel hope. For he knows in whom, or who, the end of the law is, when he says: "I have waited for your salvation, Lord, and I have done your commandments." Jesus is salvation. This is the meaning of the name from the Hebrew, this the angel spoke to Joseph, this Simeon recognized when he was then to be dismissed in peace, this the salvation restored to us through him teaches. And he professes that he has done God's commandments in this, that he waits for the Lord's salvation, declaring that all the commandments of the law are contained in the coming of the only-begotten God.
118.21.8CSEL 22:539–540
Testimonia quoque dei custodiuit uehementerque dilexit dicens: custodiuit anima mea testimonia tua et dilexi ea uehementer. custodiui mandata tua et testimonia tua, quia omnes uiae meae in conspectu tuo. agens propheta sub iudice et scrutatore cordium deo in custodia mandatorum testimoniorumque dei permanet, non in uias saeculi neque uias uitiorum et impietatis incedit. nam quodcumque uitae suae iter egerit. adeo tam probabile tamque innocens agit, ut conspectu dei dignum sit: deo ipsas cogitationes cordium et motus noscente, neque conspectu eius, qui inmundo sit corde, condigno. fidelis enim in caelo testis haec dixit, dominus noster Iesus Christus, qui est benedictus in saecula saeculorum. amen.
He also kept God's testimonies and loved them exceedingly, saying: "My soul has kept your testimonies and I have loved them exceedingly. I have kept your commandments and your testimonies, because all my ways are in your sight." The prophet, acting under God as judge and searcher of hearts, remains in the keeping of God's commandments and testimonies; he does not walk in the ways of the world nor the ways of vices and impiety. For whatever path of his life he has taken, he takes it so approved and so innocent that it is worthy of God's sight: since God knows even the thoughts and movements of hearts, and his sight is not fit for one who is of unclean heart. For the faithful witness in heaven has said these things, our Lord Jesus Christ, who is blessed for ever and ever. Amen.
Tractates 118, chapter 22
118.22.1CSEL 22:540–541
Finem sumit secundum litteram psalmus. nam omnibus his, quae sancto uiro erant propria. iuxta hebraicorum elementorum ordinem conprehensis nunc propheta, ut oratio eius deo sit proxima, deprecatur: adpropiet oratio mea in conspectu tuo, domine: secundum eloquium tuum da mihi intellectum. multa sunt, quae toto psalmo orauit ad dominum. sed quia eloquia dei plurimum in se obscuritatis per rerum caelestium sacramenta conplexa sunt, nunc maxime. ut intellectu huius eloquii sit dei dignus, precatur. ac primum ordinem modestae spei suae tenuit, cum proximam fieri conspectui dei orationem suam poscit. sequens iam per gradum altioris profectus postulatio eius iteratur, cum ait: intret postulatio mea in conspectu tuo, domine, secundum eloquium tuum eripe me. adpropinquantis orationis in conspectum dei hic fuit ordo, ut, cum coepisset esse proxima, introiret; iam eloquio dei intellecto eripi se secundum idipsum eloquium dei precatur. non enim primum, ubi est intellectus, ibi salus est, sed intellegentia adepta salus est obtinenda.
The psalm reaches its end according to the letters. For having embraced all the things proper to a holy man according to the order of the Hebrew letters, the prophet now prays that his prayer may be near to God: "Let my prayer draw near in your sight, Lord; according to your word give me understanding." Many are the things he prayed to the Lord throughout the psalm. But because God's words have embraced much obscurity in themselves through the mysteries of heavenly things, now above all he prays that he may be worthy of God's understanding of this word. And first he kept the order of his modest hope, when he asks that his prayer be brought near to the sight of God. Next, by a step of higher progress, his request is repeated, when he says: "Let my petition enter in your sight, Lord; according to your word deliver me." This was the order of the prayer approaching the sight of God, that, when it had begun to be near, it should enter; now, having understood God's word, he prays to be delivered according to that same word of God. For salvation is not first where understanding is, but once understanding is gained, salvation is to be obtained.
118.22.2CSEL 22:541
Et quia haec eadem per spiritum prophetiae uel sub futurarum rerum umbra uel sub quadam ueri tamquam de speculo imagine antelata uel sub diuinorum uerborum occulta profundaque ratione, spiritu prophetiae magis quam intellegentiae humanae sensu proferebantur, adiecit: eructauerunt labia mea hymnum. cum docueris me iustificationes tuas, pronuntiabit lingua mea eloquia tua; quia omnia mandata tua aequitas. omne prophetiae eloquium sub eructandi significatione meminimus ostendi, cum dicitur: eructauit cor meum uerbum bonum, uel illud: eructabo abscondita a constitutione mundi, uel illud: dies diei eructat uerbum. omnis autem sermo hominum ex sensu cogitationis initur ac motu, ubi ad aliquid enuntiandum mota mens nostra id, quod in adfectum sibi inciderit, per uerba declarat. at uero, ubi extra humanae mentis instinctum non ad animae sententiam lingua famulatur, sed per ineuntem spiritum officio oris nostri diuini sensus sermo diffunditur, illic eructatum uidetur esse, quod dicitur: cum non ante cogitatione motuque percepto id, ad quod pulsa sit, mens loquatur, sed ignorante sensu spiritus uocem in uerba distinguat.
And because these same things were uttered by the spirit of prophecy, either under the shadow of things to come, or under a certain image of truth set forth as in a mirror, or under the hidden and deep meaning of divine words, by the spirit of prophecy rather than by the sense of human understanding, he added: "My lips have uttered a hymn, when you have taught me your justifications; my tongue will declare your words, for all your commandments are equity." We remember that every prophetic word is shown under the meaning of "uttering forth," as when it is said: "My heart has uttered a good word," or that: "I will utter things hidden from the foundation of the world," or that: "Day utters a word to day." All human speech begins from the sense and movement of thought, when our mind, moved to declare something, declares in words what has struck its feeling. But where, beyond the impulse of the human mind, the tongue does not serve the judgment of the soul, but the speech of divine sense is poured out through the service of our mouth by the Spirit entering, there what is said seems to be uttered forth: when the mind does not speak what it has first perceived by thought and movement and by which it was struck, but the Spirit articulates the voice into words while the understanding does not know.
118.22.3CSEL 22:541–542
Nunc enim quamuis eructauerint labia hymnum, tamen post doctrinam iustificationum dei pronuntiabit lingua, quod loquitur: ut rerum dictarum cum sit percepta cognitio, tum cognitionis ipsius declaratio consequatur. non sunt autem ita mandata dei ab aequitate diuersa, ut non deo dignum sit. eorum primum intellegentiam tribuere prophetanti, tum deinde ad conscientiae publicae notionem praedicationis confessione clarescere: quia extra bonitatem dei sit, aut occultari, quod uoluerit pronuntiari, aut aliud aliquid nisi cum aequitate mandare. aequitatis autem mandatorum dei ea summa est, ut omnibus sint salutaria, ut hoc, quod in hanc uitam uenimus. cum profectu aeternitatis ineamus. nam nasci ad mortem, non uitae est causa, sed mortis.
For now, although his lips have uttered a hymn, yet after the teaching of God's justifications his tongue will declare what it speaks: so that when knowledge of the things said has been gained, then the declaration of that knowledge may follow. And God's commandments are not so different from equity that it should not be worthy of God first to grant the understanding of them to the one who prophesies, and then for them to shine forth to the public awareness by the confession of preaching: because it would be beyond God's goodness either to hide what he wished to be declared or to command anything except with equity. And the sum of the equity of God's commandments is this, that they are saving for all, so that this coming of ours into this life we may enter with advance toward eternity. For to be born for death is not a cause of life, but of death.
118.22.4CSEL 22:542
Et huius spei suae fiduciam mox propheta subiecit dicens: fiat manus tua saluum faciat me; quoniam mandata tua elegi. aliis gloriam saeculi eligentibus, aliis uenerationem elementorum ac daemonum capessentibus, aliis terrenas opes expetentibus sanctus iste mandata dei elegit elegit autem non naturali necessitate, sed uoluntate pietatis, quia unicuique ad id, quod uult, uia est proposita uiuendi, et adpetendi atque agendi permissa libertas. et ob id uniuscuiusque aut poena aut praemiis adficietur electio.
And the prophet soon added the confidence of this hope of his, saying: "Let your hand be there to save me, for I have chosen your commandments." While others choose the glory of the world, others take up the veneration of elements and demons, others seek earthly wealth, this holy man chose God's commandments; and he chose them not by natural necessity but by the will of piety, because to each a way of living toward what he wills is set before him, and the freedom to seek and to act is permitted. And for this reason each one's choice will be visited either with punishment or with rewards.
118.22.5CSEL 22:542–543
Sed mandatorum domini qui esset finis, ostendit dicens: concupiui salutare tuum, domine, et lex tua meditatio mea est. totum se iste in aduentum Iesu salutaris extendit; et illud, quod apostolorum beatitudini uidere fuit proprium, desideriis inpatientibus concupiscit, hoc tamen ipsum. quod in lege agit, meditationem futurae spei esse significans. quia non ad praesentium effectum, sed ad futurorum profectum omnis intellegitur suscipi solere meditatio.
But he showed what the end of the Lord's commandments was, saying: "I have longed for your salvation, Lord, and your law is my meditation." He stretches himself wholly toward the coming of Jesus the Savior; and what was proper to the blessedness of the apostles to see, he longs for with impatient desires, while signifying that what he does in the law is a meditation on future hope: because all meditation is understood to be undertaken not for the effect of present things but for the progress of future ones.
118.22.6CSEL 22:543
Ac meditationis istius quod praemium esset, ostendit: uiuet anima mea et laudabit te: et iudicia tua iuuabunt me. uiuere se in hac uita non reputat, quippe qui dixerit: ecce in iniquitatibus conceptus sum et delictis peperit me mater mea. scit sub peccati origine et sub peccati lege se esse natum; meditationem autem legis dei ob id elegit, ut uiuat. animam suam superiore psalmo ad uitae istius gaudia adhortatur, cum ait: conuertere, anima mea, in requiem tuam, quoniam dominus benefecit mihi: quia eripuit animam meam a morte, oculos meos a lacrimis, pedes meos a lapsu. placebo domino in regione uiuentium. has laudes deo referre festinat, iudiciis dei absorpta terrenae corruptionis infirmitate ad aeternitatis adiutus profectum: ob id utique, quia elegit mandata et concupiuit salutare domini, quia meditatio eius in lege dei semper est.
And he showed what the reward of this meditation was: "My soul will live and praise you, and your judgments will help me." He does not reckon that he lives in this life, since he has said: "Behold, I was conceived in iniquities, and in sins my mother bore me." He knows that he was born under the origin of sin and under the law of sin; but he chose meditation on God's law for this reason, that he may live. In an earlier psalm he urges his soul toward the joys of this life, when he says: "Return, my soul, to your rest, for the Lord has done good to me: for he has delivered my soul from death, my eyes from tears, my feet from falling. I will please the Lord in the land of the living." He hastens to render these praises to God, when, by God's judgments, the weakness of earthly corruption has been swallowed up and he has been helped to the advance of eternity: and that surely because he chose the commandments and longed for the Lord's salvation, because his meditation is always in God's law.
118.22.7CSEL 22:543–544
Digno autem omnia sacramenti euangelici fine conclusit dicens: erraui sicut ouis, quae perit: uiuifica seruum tuum, quia mandata tua non sum oblitus. referri enim se errabundam ac perditam ouem pastoris sui humeris festinat, ut per salutarem aeternumque pastorem in caelo angelis aeterna gaudia praebeat se recepta. filius enim hominis uenit saluare, quod perierat, missus ad oues perditas domus Israhel, dominus Iesus Christus, qui est benedictus in saecula saeculorum. amen.
He concluded all with an end worthy of the gospel mystery, saying: "I have gone astray like a sheep that is lost; give life to your servant, for I have not forgotten your commandments." For he hastens to be carried back, a wandering and lost sheep, on the shoulders of his shepherd, so that, recovered through the saving and eternal shepherd, he may give eternal joys to the angels in heaven. For the Son of Man came to save what was lost, sent to the lost sheep of the house of Israel, the Lord Jesus Christ, who is blessed for ever and ever. Amen.
Tractates 119
119.1CSEL 22:544
Psalmorum tituli, ut in plurimis ostendimus, habent proprias suas significationes, rationem et argumenta scriptorum, quae subiacent, breuissime continentes nosque quodam doctrinae indicio in intellegentiae semitam dirigentes; de quibus nunc non necesse est aliquid tractare. tum enim id fieri oportet. cum psalmus unusquisque tractabitur. cum enim sibi inuicem auctoritatem praestent et psalmus et titulus, debilis erit sermo. si de aliquo eorum absque altero disseretur. nunc uero canticum graduum attingimus, quorum et continua et aequalis inscriptio est; atque ideo significatione conueniente titulorum sub unius expositionis negotio uniuersorum reperietur ratio esse monstrata.
The titles of the Psalms, as we have shown in very many cases, have their own proper meanings, containing very briefly the reason and argument of the writings beneath them and directing us by a kind of signpost of teaching into the path of understanding; about which there is no need to treat anything now. For that should be done when each psalm is treated. For since the psalm and the title lend authority to each other, the discourse will be weak if one of them is discussed without the other. But now we come to the Songs of Ascents, whose inscription is continuous and the same; and therefore, since the meaning of the titles agrees, the reason of all will be found to have been shown in the course of a single exposition.
119.2CSEL 22:544–545
In plerisque psalmis multa secundum historiae ordinem in superscriptionibus eorum esse edita legimus: ut cum fugit Dauid a facie filii sui Abessalon, cum mutauit uultum suum coram Abimelech, cum post Bersabee a Nathan monetur, et in reliquis, sicubi gestorum ueritas ipsis psalmorum titulis continetur. sed meminisse nos oportet hos eosdem psalmos non idcirco omnes corporaliter intellegendos, quia his corporalium negotiorum significatio antefertur; quin potius oportet nos spiritalem intellegentiam sub hac quadam gestarum rerum commemoratione sectari, de quo non est nunc temporis dicere;, sed simplicitati legentium consulentes legentem fuit congruum admonere. ergo, ne secundum praedictos ex pluribus titulos hi quoque graduum psalmi aliquid de historia contineant, uidendum est.
In most psalms we read that many things were set out in their superscriptions according to the order of history: as when David fled from the face of his son Absalom, when he changed his face before Abimelech, when after Bathsheba he is warned by Nathan, and in the rest, wherever the truth of events is contained in the titles of the psalms themselves. But we must remember that these same psalms are not all to be understood bodily for the reason that the signification of bodily affairs stands before them; rather we must pursue a spiritual understanding under this kind of record of things done, about which this is not the time to speak; but out of concern for the simplicity of readers it was fitting to remind the reader. So we must see whether these psalms of ascents too, like the many titles mentioned before, contain anything of history.
119.3CSEL 22:545–546
In Esaiae enim libro orante Ezechia signum ei positum prorogatae salutis in gradibus est. erant autem in domo eius gradus decem, quos sol ultra temporis sui cursum lumine suo accedente conscendit rursumque die mortis eius de temporis sui limite lumine decedente descendit. sed nulla ad psalmos huius historiae similitudo est, cum graduum ne numerus quidem ipse conueniat. hoc tamen, quod Ezechiae datum signum est, manifeste ostendit dei lumen his, quibus ob negotiorum saecularium merita futurae uitae beatitudo inpertietur, accedere, illis uero, quibus sit negata, decedere.
For in the book of Isaiah, when Hezekiah prayed, a sign of prolonged health was set for him on steps. There were in his house ten steps, which the sun climbed beyond the course of its time as its light advanced, and again, on the day of his death, it went down from the limit of its time as its light withdrew. But there is no likeness of this history to the psalms, since not even the number of the steps agrees. Yet the sign given to Hezekiah clearly shows that God's light comes to those to whom, because of the merits of their worldly affairs, the blessedness of future life will be granted, but withdraws from those to whom it is denied.
119.4CSEL 22:546
Esse autem in templo gradus quindecim historia nobis locuta est dispositosque ordines consistentium, quibus quaedam quasi dignitas in antecedentibus obtineretur, ut Leuitae primum consisterent, post Israhelitae, tum proselyti et deinceps alii. sed quid de psalmis antea scriptis ex historia posteriore praesumimus, cum, si quid ex ea suscipiendum sit, suscipi ita debeat, ut psalmi historiam subsequantur? nisi tamen aliquid sit ad futuram historiam prophetatum. sed contuentes ipsam illam templi atque altaris aedificationem, umbram esse incorrupti templi et sanctificati speciem altaris his, quae in eo corporaliter praefigurata sunt, intellegeremus, nisi auctoritas praesumeretur ex psalmis? psalmi enim non sui tantum temporis res enuntiant neque in eas solum aetates conueniunt. quibus scripti sunt, sed uniuersis, qui in uitam uenirent, dei sermo consuluit, uniuersae aetati ipse aptissimus ad profectum.
History has told us that there were fifteen steps in the temple and orders of those standing on them arranged, by which a certain dignity was held by those in front, so that the Levites stood first, after them the Israelites, then the proselytes, and then others. But why do we presume about psalms written earlier from later history, since, if anything is to be taken from it, it ought to be taken so that the psalms follow the history? Unless indeed something was prophesied for future history. But looking at that very building of the temple and altar, would we understand it to be a shadow of the incorruptible temple and a likeness of the sanctified altar in the things bodily prefigured in it, unless authority were taken beforehand from the psalms? For the psalms do not declare only the things of their own time, nor do they fit only those ages in which they were written; but God's word has provided for all who would come into life, being itself most suited for the progress of every age.
119.5CSEL 22:546–547
Erat namque illa sacerdotii lex, quam secundum legis obseruantiam in euangelio Lucas sub Iohannis Baptistae natiuitate diligenter exposuit, neminem in sancta sanctorum ascendere nisi qui esset princeps sacerdotum, eundemque toto in anno uno tantum die. quae omnia in similitudinem antea gesta in uno domino nostro expleta esse, et fides nostra et ipse dominus nobis in euangelio auctor est dicens: non ueni legem soluere, sed adimplere. apostolus quoque omnem consummationem legis in domino nostro Iesu Christo esse testatur dicens: finis enim legis Christus est. sed et hic idem Dauid propheta aeternum eum sacerdotem docet dicens: tu es sacerdos in aeternum secundum ordinem Melchisedech. hic igitur princeps sacerdotum ingressus caelos, sedens ad dexteram dei, orans ad patrem, ut, ubi ille esset, nos quoque essemus, qui et excitauit et collocauit nos in caelestibus, ille iam per prophetam monuerat, quibus modis quibusque uitae operationibus ascendi posset ad sese, per Esaiam ita: lauamini, mundi estote, auferte nequitias ab animis uestris e conspectu oculorum meorum: desinite a malitiis uestris, discite bonum facere, exquirite iudicium, eruite iniuriam accipientem, iudicate pupillo et iustificate uiduam: et uenite disputemus, dicit dominus omnipotens. hi sunt igitur gradus perfecti illius aeternique templi, quos princeps sacerdotum facta per sanguinem suum peccatorum nostrorum propitiatione transcendit, modo terreni ex lege sacerdotis seu gradibus in sanctorum sancta scandentis seu litationis hostiam pro populo offerentis.
For there was that law of the priesthood which Luke carefully set out in the gospel, according to the observance of the law, at the birth of John the Baptist: that no one went up into the holy of holies except the one who was chief of the priests, and he only on one day in the whole year. That all these things, done beforehand as a likeness, were fulfilled in our Lord alone, both our faith and the Lord himself in the gospel assure us, saying: "I came not to abolish the law but to fulfil it." The apostle too testifies that all the completion of the law is in our Lord Jesus Christ, saying: "For Christ is the end of the law." And this same prophet David teaches that he is the eternal priest, saying: "You are a priest for ever according to the order of Melchizedek." This chief of the priests, then, having entered the heavens, sitting at God's right hand, praying to the Father that where he is we too may be, who also raised us up and seated us in the heavenly places, had already warned through the prophet by what means and by what works of life one could ascend to him, through Isaiah thus: "Wash yourselves, be clean, take away the wickedness from your souls before my eyes; cease from your evil deeds, learn to do good, seek justice, rescue the one who suffers wrong, judge for the orphan and vindicate the widow: and come, let us reason together, says the Lord almighty." These, then, are the steps of that perfect and eternal temple, which the chief of the priests went up, having made propitiation for our sins through his blood, in the manner of the earthly priest under the law, either climbing by steps into the holy of holies or offering the victim of atonement for the people.
119.6CSEL 22:547–548
Ac de quindecim quidem gradibus et superscriptione cantici iam in exordio psalmorum tum, cum sermo de numeris et de superscriptionibus incidit, aliqua tractauimus, ex duobus scilicet numeris hebdomade et ogdoade, quorum unus ob sabbatum legis sit, alius ob accedentem ad sabbatum octauam, quae et prima est, sit euangeliorum, hunc numerum conuenire. per quae eorum canticum quasi legis et euangeliorum gradibus ad caelestia nos et aeterna conscendimus cognoscentes collocandos nos cum summo sacerdote in caelestibus, si tamen secundum Paulum conuersatio nostra in caelis sit. hos gradus canticum quaeramus, per quos scandere ad loca, quae sunt sanctorum sancta, possimus. arduus enim usque in ea et angusti itineris ascensus est. gradus quindecim fuisse scimus in templo: psalmos quoque graduum quindecim legimus. numerosus est hic desideratae illius sedis ascensus. forte enim, ut in templo paulatim et per gradus singulos conscendebatur ad sancta, ita per singulorum psalmorum profectus docebimur, his gradibus, qui cantantur, ascensis posse nos in excelsis et sanctis et aeternis collocari.
Of the fifteen steps and the superscription "song" we already treated something at the beginning of the Psalms, when the discussion turned to numbers and superscriptions: namely that this number agrees with two numbers, seven and eight, one of which is for the Sabbath of the law, the other for the eighth that comes after the Sabbath, which is also the first, belonging to the gospels. Through the song of these, as by steps of the law and the gospels, we climb to heavenly and eternal things, knowing that we are to be seated with the high priest in the heavenly places, if indeed, according to Paul, our citizenship is in heaven. Let us seek in the song these steps by which we may climb to the places that are the holy of holies. For the ascent to them is steep and of a narrow road. We know there were fifteen steps in the temple; we read also fifteen psalms of steps. This ascent to that desired seat is in numbered stages. For perhaps, as in the temple one climbed gradually and by single steps to the holy place, so through the progress of the single psalms we shall be taught that, having climbed these steps which are sung, we can be placed in the high, holy, and eternal places.
119.7CSEL 22:548–549
Plures autem sunt, qui in his psalmis solam captiuitatem populi, qua in Babylonia septuaginta annis detentus est, existiment prophetatam, sed et reditum populi eiusdem cum restauratione ciuitatis amissae. quibus non calumniamur. neque enim ambigitur prophetam ea, quae impietati huius populi inminerent, scire potuisse. sed quam captiuitatem populi et cuius ciuitatis aedificationem propheta commemoret, ipsi psalmi nobis auctores erunt, qui ita coepti sunt:
There are many who think that in these psalms only the captivity of the people, by which it was held in Babylon for seventy years, was prophesied, and also the return of the same people with the restoration of the lost city. We do not quarrel with them. For there is no doubt that the prophet could know the things that threatened the impiety of this people. But what captivity of the people and the building of what city the prophet mentions, the psalms themselves will tell us, which begin thus:
119.8CSEL 22:549
Ad te, domine, cum tribularer clamaui, et exaudisti me. propheticus sermo, licet communi usu humani sermonis utatur, tamen non eandem, quae communi sensui adiacet, significantiam continet. namque quamuis, prout possemus intellegere, rerum caelestium enuntiationem temperaret, uirtutem tamen significantiae suae moderata licet uerborum electione seruauit. coepit enim ita: ad te, domine, cum tribularer clamaui, et exaudisti me. de consuetudine forte et pro humani sensus affectione clamor hic ad deum prophetae existimabitur, ut promiscuus hic dolor sit, ob quem etiam cum uociferatione deum precetur, quia multos aut periculi metus mortisque terror, aut damni anxietas ac pecuniae dolor, aut orbitatis telum dolorumque uulnera ad deum uocem efferre conpellunt; tamquam non omnia eorum, quae accidunt, bonis spebus aptissima sint. apostolus dissolui et cum Christo esse sibi melius esse testatur, curam pecuniae radicem totius malitiae condemnat, et flendos potius uiuos euangelia dixerunt: et quid contra haec fidei nostrae proposito firmato loci aduersus nos saeculo relinquetur, cum Christi consortium mors adquirat, inopia pecuniae praestet inopiam peccati, nostrorum abscessio spei communis sit accelerata properatio?
"To you, Lord, when I was in distress I cried, and you heard me." The prophetic word, although it uses the common practice of human speech, does not contain the same meaning that lies close to common sense. For although it tempered its declaration of heavenly things so that we might understand it, it kept the force of its meaning, though with a moderate choice of words. For it began thus: "To you, Lord, when I was in distress I cried, and you heard me." Perhaps this cry of the prophet to God will be thought to come from habit and from the feeling of human sense, as though it were an ordinary grief for which he prays to God even with shouting, because fear of danger and terror of death, or anxiety over loss and grief over money, or the dart of bereavement and the wounds of sorrow drive many to raise their voice to God; as though not all the things that happen to them were most suited to good hopes. The apostle testifies that it is better for him to be dissolved and to be with Christ; he condemns care for money as the root of all evil; and the gospels said the living should rather be wept for: and what room will be left to the world against us, against these things, when the purpose of our faith is firm, since death gains the fellowship of Christ, lack of money provides lack of sin, and the departure of our own is the hastened approach of our common hope?
119.9CSEL 22:549–550
Sed si istae non sunt, quae ergo erunt tribulationes, ob quas clametur ad dominum? sunt plane et maximae, trahentes nos in profundum peccati. propheta enim hominem gradibus ad aeterna scandentem ex persona sua formans, quibus maxime malis cauere debeat, docet; his namque, quae consiliorum auctoritatibus et hortationum inpulsibus et blanditiarum inlecebris in infernum demergunt, cum alius nos hortatur ad honores, alius otio, somno, gula, luxu ad praesentem uitam detinet, alius ad falsarum religionum superstitionem deducit, alius hortatur ad schismata, alius ad haeresim sollicitat. de quibus scriptum est: subuertunt mores bonos colloquia mala. namque aduersus haec omnia animi nostri inbecilla natura est. circumcursant enim undique ac uariis nos blandimentorum suorum aculeis conpungunt. ac prima illa spes uitae est, ut inrumpentibus illis in sensum nostrum ui, fraude, dominatu, tamquam e media tribulatione clamemus ad dominum, ut conuersio nostra ad eum, conflictantibus calamitatibus, totis fidelis clamoris uiribus audiatur. iam autem ipse clamor ad eum noster erit requies et ipsa confessio deprecandi maxima est pars salutis. et idcirco ait: ad te, domine, cum tribularer clamaui, et exaudisti me. ipse enim solitus est precantibus dicere: ecce adsum.
But if these are not, what then will be the distresses for which one cries to the Lord? There are certainly very great ones, dragging us into the depth of sin. For the prophet, shaping from his own person the man who climbs by steps to eternal things, teaches which evils he must most guard against: namely those which, by the authority of counsels, the urging of exhortations, and the allurements of flatteries, plunge into hell, when one urges us to honors, another holds us to the present life by leisure, sleep, gluttony, and luxury, another leads us to the superstition of false religions, another urges to schisms, another solicits to heresy. Of these it is written: "Evil conversations corrupt good morals." For against all these the nature of our mind is weak. For they run around us on every side and prick us with the various goads of their flatteries. And the first hope of life is this, that when they break into our sense by force, fraud, and domination, we cry to the Lord as from the midst of distress, so that our turning to him, while calamities clash about us, may be heard with all the strength of a faithful cry. And then our very cry to him will be our rest, and the very confession of praying is the greatest part of salvation. And therefore he says: "To you, Lord, when I was in distress I cried, and you heard me." For he himself is accustomed to say to those who pray: "Behold, I am here."
119.10CSEL 22:550–551
Et quia adest, de his, quae consecuntur, rogandus est: domine libera animam meam a labiis iniquis et a lingua dolosa. haec enim sola tribulatio iustis periculosa est, malae adhortationis societas et pestiferi consilii consuetudo. a qua animus referendus est et aures obstruendae sunt. distinxit autem labia iniqua et linguam dolosam. et quidem iniquitas inuerecunda est, palam audet, palam molitur, palam perficit. hi sunt, qui abnegantes deum nullum humanis rebus adserunt relicum esse in religione dei profectum; sed solum hoc sibi bonum esse, quod luxui et corpori uiuant adimentes deo curam, prouidentiam, arbitrium, potestatem. horum ergo labia sunt iniqua. dolosae autem linguae opus fallax est et per simulationem noxium. quod sub religionis nomine euertat religionem et per uitae spem deducat in mortem. haereticorum quoque ista mendacia sunt, prophetarum dictis et euangeliorum uirtutibus et apostolorum perscriptionibus mendacio occultatis aliter omnia tradere et docere quam scripta sunt. ab his igitur per dei misericordiam orantes liberamur et inter eorum tribulationes clamantes ad deum exaudiemur.
And because he is present, he must be asked about what follows: "Lord, deliver my soul from wicked lips and from a deceitful tongue." For this alone is a dangerous distress for the righteous: the company of evil exhortation and the habit of pestilent counsel, from which the mind must be drawn back and the ears stopped. He distinguished wicked lips and a deceitful tongue. Wickedness is shameless: it dares openly, attempts openly, accomplishes openly. These are those who, denying God, assert that there is no profit left for human affairs in the religion of God, but that this alone is good for them, to live for luxury and the body, taking away from God care, providence, judgment, power. Theirs, then, are wicked lips. But the work of a deceitful tongue is fraudulent and harmful through pretense, overturning religion under the name of religion and leading to death through hope of life. These are also the lies of the heretics: hiding by lies the sayings of the prophets, the powers of the gospels, and the writings of the apostles, to hand on and teach everything otherwise than it is written. From these, then, we are freed by God's mercy when we pray, and crying to God amid the distresses they cause we shall be heard.
119.11CSEL 22:551–552
Sed sequitur: quid detur tibi quid adponatur tibi ad linguam dolosam? bene ad id, quod dictum est: ad te, domine, cum tribularer clamaui, et exaudisti me: domine, libera animam meam a labiis iniquis et a lingua dolosa, subicitur: quid detur tibi, et quid adponatur tibi ad linguam dolosam? ut per prophetam impleretur, quod a domino dictum est: ecce adsum tibi, tamquam in ipso puncto imprecationis haec domini uox refertur: quid detur tibi et quid adponatur tibi ad linguam dolosam? frequenter autem interrogantis domini sermonem legimus et in nouo et in ueteri testamento, ut ad Adam: ubi es Adam? ut ad Cain: ubi est frater tuus? ut ad turbas, cum mulier fimbriam attigisset: quis me tetigit? ut ad discipulos: quem me dicunt homines? uos autem quid dicitis? non ille doceri uult, qui scrutans corda et renes deus est, cogitationum nostrarum inspector est, sed per confessionem interrogatorum aut peccatis ueniam aut fidei honorem redditurus interrogat. denique Adam confessus ueniae reseruatus et glorificatus in Christo est: Cain negans maledicto diaboli adaequatus est; est enim iam a principio designatus homicida. confessa mulier fide sanata est; respondens fide Petrus claues caeli sortitus est. atque ita omne spei nostrae praemium in confessione consistit, ut ea, quae consequi nos posse credidimus, consecuturos esse testemur.
But there follows: "What shall be given to you, and what shall be added to you, against a deceitful tongue?" Fittingly, to what was said, "To you, Lord, when I was in distress I cried, and you heard me: Lord, deliver my soul from wicked lips and from a deceitful tongue," there is added: "What shall be given to you, and what shall be added to you, against a deceitful tongue?" so that what was said by the Lord through the prophet might be fulfilled, "Behold, I am here for you," as though at the very moment of the prayer this voice of the Lord is returned: "What shall be given to you, and what shall be added to you, against a deceitful tongue?" We often read the word of the Lord questioning, in both the New and the Old Testament: as to Adam, "Where are you, Adam?"; as to Cain, "Where is your brother?"; as to the crowds, when the woman had touched the fringe, "Who touched me?"; as to the disciples, "Whom do men say that I am? But you, whom do you say?" He who is God, searching hearts and reins, the inspector of our thoughts, does not wish to be taught, but asks in order to give, through the confession of those questioned, either pardon for sins or honor for faith. So Adam, having confessed, was reserved for pardon and glorified in Christ; Cain, denying, was made equal to the curse of the devil, for the devil is marked from the beginning as a murderer. The woman, having confessed, was healed by faith; Peter, answering by faith, received the keys of heaven. And so the whole reward of our hope consists in confession, so that we testify that we shall attain what we have believed we can attain.
119.12CSEL 22:552–553
Et idcirco quaedam a propheta interrogationis est facta conuersio; sed fidei digna consecuta responsio est. ad id enim, quod quaesitum est: quid detur tibi et quid adponatur tibi ad linguam dolosam? id est: quid tibi aduersus falsitatem eius praesidii adferatur? responsum est: sagittae potentes acutae cum carbonibus desolatoriis. solae enim sunt domini potentes et acutae sagittae, quae linguam dolosam ualent configere habentes in se uirtutem perurendae fraudulentiae atque uastandae; de quibus in septimo psalmo ait: sagittas suas arsuris operatus est; quae sibi utraque conueniunt. dei enim uerbum omnem nequitiam configit et omnem sensum petulantiae conuulnerat et ipsum illum uehementissimum mortis aculeum conpungit. namque peccator cum audiat deum aeternum, deum mundi conditorem, deum iudicem, seseque hominem intellegat deo debere, quod natus sit, quanto doctrinae dei telo conscientia eius errorque ferietur, cum se igni inextinguibili, separatum ut paleas tritico et desolatum bonorum fructuum consortio, cognoscat urendum? cuius doctrinae per apostolos reuelandae in psalmo altero meminit dicens: sagittae paruulorum factae sunt plagae eorum. has potentes sagittas, hos carbones desolationis dari sibi fidelis quisque orat et ad linguam dolosam expectat adponi emendandis his, qui tribulant, uel doctrinae telo uel metu poenae.
And therefore a certain turning of the question has been made by the prophet; but an answer worthy of faith followed. For to what was asked, "What shall be given to you, and what shall be added to you, against a deceitful tongue?" that is, what protection will be brought to you against its falsehood, the answer is: "Sharp arrows of the mighty, with desolating coals." For only the Lord's arrows are mighty and sharp, which can pierce the deceitful tongue, having in themselves the power to burn up and lay waste fraudulence; of which he says in the seventh psalm: "He has made his arrows for burning"; and both agree with each other. For the word of God pierces all wickedness, wounds every sense of wantonness, and pricks that most violent sting of death itself. For when the sinner hears of the eternal God, God the founder of the world, God the judge, and understands that he, a man, owes it to God that he was born, how greatly will his conscience and error be struck by the dart of God's teaching, when he recognizes that he is to be burned in unquenchable fire, separated like chaff from wheat and desolated from the fellowship of good fruits? Of this teaching, to be revealed through the apostles, he speaks in another psalm: "The arrows of little ones have become their wounds." Every faithful man prays that these mighty arrows, these coals of desolation, be given to him, and expects them to be set against the deceitful tongue to correct those who cause distress, either by the dart of teaching or by fear of punishment.
119.13CSEL 22:553
Sed et beatus Iob hostem suum. quo confixus fuerat, ignorans cruciatus corporis sui et dolores sagittas domini esse dixit dicens: sagittae enim domini in corpore meo sunt, quarum indignatio ebibit sanguinem meum. et forte has quoque ultricium poenarum sagittas aduersus labia iniqua et linguam dolosam inprecetur propheta, quibus confixa eum lingua dolosa uniuersa labia perurantur.
But blessed Job too, not knowing the enemy by whom he had been pierced, said that the tortures and pains of his body were the Lord's arrows, saying: "For the arrows of the Lord are in my body, whose anger has drunk up my blood." And perhaps the prophet calls down these arrows of avenging punishments too against the wicked lips and deceitful tongue, so that, pierced by them, the deceitful tongue and all the lips may be burned up.
119.14CSEL 22:553–554
Quamquam sint plures, qui spiritaliter suscepta a fidelibus caelestis doctrinae praecepta sagittas uelint existimari et carbones desolationum peccatorum emundationem, atque ita accipiendum putent carbones desolationis, quia dominus dixit: ignem ueni mittere in terram; et quid uolo, si iam accensus est? non est autem dubium, peccatorum eum ablutionem et remissionem attulisse; quem ignem iam accensum esse dixerit. quia per eum uitiorum omnium fiat sordiumque purgatio. accommodant autem ad hoc illud, quod dictum ad Esaiam est, cum per forcipem carbone conprehenso labia eius contacta sunt: ecce abstuli iniustitias tuas et peccata tua purgaui.
Yet there are many who would take the arrows to be the precepts of heavenly teaching received spiritually by the faithful, and the desolating coals to be the cleansing of sins, and who think that the coals of desolation should be understood so because the Lord said: "I came to send fire on the earth; and what do I wish, if it is already kindled?" And there is no doubt that he brought the washing and forgiveness of sins, a fire he said was already kindled, because through him comes the purging of all vices and filth. They apply to this also what was said to Isaiah when, with a coal taken by tongs, his lips were touched: "Behold, I have taken away your iniquities and purged your sins."
119.15CSEL 22:554
Sagittam autem ipsum dominum nuncupatum in eodem Esaia meminimus hoc modo: posuit me ut sagittam electam et in pharetra sua abscondit me et ait: grande tibi est hoc, uocari te puerum meum. esse itaque intellegimus etiam hunc utilem sagittam et potentem. confixis uitiorum nostrorum aculeis salubri nos uulnere utilique penetrantem; de qua sagitta sponsa illa in Canticis dixerit: uulnerata dilectionis ego sum.
And we remember that the Lord himself is called an arrow in the same Isaiah thus: "He has made me like a chosen arrow and hidden me in his quiver," and he said: "It is a great thing for you to be called my servant." So we understand that he too is a useful and mighty arrow, piercing the stings of our vices and penetrating us with a healthful and useful wound; of which arrow the bride in the Song says: "I am wounded with love."
119.16CSEL 22:554
Sint ergo hae sagittae utrumque in modum expectatae. uel in poenam conscientiae iniquos ac dolosos configentes uel in dilectorum sibi corporibus peccata et uitia uulnerantes: sitque uel deuastans carbo uel purgans, dummodo abnegantes deum per poenam absumat, purget autem ad perfectam innocentiam confitentes.
Let these arrows, then, be expected in both ways, either piercing the wicked and deceitful for the punishment of conscience, or wounding sins and vices in the bodies of those dear to him; and let the coal be either destroying or purifying, so long as it consumes by punishment those who deny God, but purifies to perfect innocence those who confess.
119.17CSEL 22:554–555
Sed quae ad superiora dicta sequens prophetae responsio est? heu me! quod incolatus meus prolongatus est! bona non possunt uideri uere bona a nobis iudicari, nisi expetantur. nam quomodo fidem iudicii nostri, nisi eorum, de quibus bene iudicauerimus, efficientia praestabimus? bonam pudicitiam existimamus: qui ergo opinionis nostrae fructus, nisi in ipsa pudicitiae adpetitione consistet? bona est innocentia: sed nisi festinantes atque exercentes eam uere ita sentire non intellegemur. mentium enim iudicia non uerbis significanda sunt, sed rebus explenda. conuenit igitur prophetam, expectantem post sagittas domini et illos carbones desolationis beati illius regni et aeterni temporis gloriam, id, quod expectat. desiderare. et desiderat plane. neque solum desiderat. sed moras odit et ipsam illam non potiundi iam desiderii tanti dolet dilationem dicens: heu me! quod incolatus meus prolongatus est.
But what is the prophet's answer following the sayings above? "Woe is me, that my sojourning has been prolonged!" Good things cannot seem to be truly judged good by us unless they are sought after. For how shall we show the sincerity of our judgment except by pursuing the things we have judged well? We think chastity good: what fruit, then, is there of our opinion except in seeking chastity itself? Innocence is good: but unless we hasten toward it and practise it, we shall not be understood truly to think so. For the judgments of minds are not to be signified by words but fulfilled in deeds. It is fitting, then, that the prophet, who after the Lord's arrows and those coals of desolation expects the glory of that blessed kingdom and eternal time, should desire what he expects. And he plainly desires it. And not only does he desire it, but he hates delays and grieves at the very postponement of not yet possessing so great a desire, saying: "Woe is me, that my sojourning has been prolonged!"
119.18CSEL 22:555
Querellam istiusmodi a plurimis sanctis frequenter audiuimus, tarditatem spei suae morosa corporum dissolutione deflentium. dominus in euangeliis docuit accelerationem regni caelestis orandam. inpatientem enim caritatem esse eorum, quae amet, conuenit; atque ideo dici oportet, quod ut dicamus a domino praecipimur: adueniat regnum tuum, fiat uoluntas tua. Paulus beatus in habitatione corporis sui congemescit, per incolatum carnis peregrinari se a deo conquerens. ex quo contra peregrinandum in carne scit sibi esse, ut ei cum deo sit incolatus: sed tamen melius ei esse dissolui et cum Christo esse. Ecclesiastes ait: et laudaui omnes, qui mortui sunt, super omnes, qui uiuunt usque nunc: liberata scilicet per dissolutionem corporis anima, onere atque consortio eam esse infirmis huius et periculosae carnis exutam. in hoc igitur nimium sibi prolixo in corpore incolatu congemescit propheta, festinans peregrinari a terrenis et incolere caelestia, ut derelictis corruptibilibus atque praesentibus consequatur inuisibilia et aeterna.
We have often heard a complaint of this kind from many saints, lamenting the slowness of their hope through the lingering dissolution of their bodies. The Lord taught in the gospels that the hastening of the heavenly kingdom must be prayed for. For it is fitting that love be impatient for what it loves; and therefore we ought to say what we are commanded by the Lord to say: "Your kingdom come, your will be done." Blessed Paul groans in the dwelling of his body, complaining that through his sojourning in the flesh he is away from God. Hence he knows that, on the contrary, he must be away from the flesh in order to have his dwelling with God; but yet it is better for him to be dissolved and to be with Christ. Ecclesiastes says: "And I praised all who are dead above all who are living until now": that is, the soul set free through the dissolution of the body has been stripped of the burden and fellowship of this weak and dangerous flesh. In this sojourning in the body, then, too long for him, the prophet groans, hastening to be away from earthly things and to dwell in heavenly ones, so that, leaving corruptible and present things, he may attain the invisible and eternal.
119.19CSEL 22:555–556
Iob sanctus et testimonio dei dignus non solum corporis istius incolatum congemescit, sed ipsam illam natiuitatis suae diem maledicit dicens: pereat dies, in qua natus sum, et nox, in qua dixerunt: ecce masculus; et Hieremias similiter: maledicta dies, in qua genitus sum; maledictus nuntians patri meo et dicens: quia natus est tibi masculus. atqui idem a domino audierat: priusquam te formarem in utero, noui te; et priusquam exires de uulua, sanctificaui te. quid ergo? maledicit coepisse se, qui ante quam esset, et deo cognitus et sanctificatus a deo est? absit istud. non enim hoc in se, quod sanctificatus est, odit, sed ea, quae in sanctificationem consecuta sunt, maledicit, prouectum se scilicet per incrementa corporis in has molestias corporei incolatus. formatus enim intra matris uuluam et per uirtutem creatoris sui in substantia animae ad dei imaginem figuratus non conceptus et figurationis suae ortum. sed eum, qui ex incremento accessit, profectum editi corporis congemescit, in quo sibi in malis saeculi et infirmitatibus carnis uitiisque uiuendum sit. iam tamen conformato in utero et in uulua sanctificato, specie in se originis caelestis aeterna. non ambiguum, quin ex dei sanctificatione post legem mortis huius esset mansurus aeternus.
Holy Job, worthy of God's testimony, not only groans at his sojourning in this body but curses the very day of his birth, saying: "Let the day perish on which I was born, and the night in which they said: Behold, a male"; and Jeremiah likewise: "Cursed be the day on which I was born; cursed be he who brought news to my father, saying: A male child is born to you." And yet the same man had heard from the Lord: "Before I formed you in the womb I knew you; and before you came out of the womb I sanctified you." What then? Does he curse having begun to exist, who before he existed was both known to God and sanctified by God? Far be it. For he does not hate in himself that he was sanctified, but curses what followed upon the sanctification, namely that he was carried forward by the growth of the body into these troubles of bodily sojourning. For formed within his mother's womb and shaped by the power of his creator in the substance of the soul after the image of God, he does not hate the beginning of his conception and shaping, but groans at the progress of the body brought forth, which came by growth, in which he must live amid the evils of the world and the weaknesses and vices of the flesh. Yet since he was already formed in the womb and sanctified in the womb, with the eternal likeness of a heavenly origin in him, there is no doubt that by God's sanctification he would remain eternal after the law of this death.
119.20CSEL 22:556–557
Sed prophetae huius non in multum longe alius affectus est, quam Iob atque Hieremiae. non enim incolatum, sed prolongatum incolatum suum queritur. nam post prolixi huius incolatus sui querellam consequitur ad id, quod ait: heu me! quod incolatus meus prolongatus est, habitaui cum habitantibus Cedar. Cedar gens est Ismahelitarum deserta incolens, cuius fines usque Medos et Persas proferuntur. Cedar enim Ismael filius fuit Genesi testante: primitiuus, inquit, Ismael Nabaioth et Cedar. hi sunt nunc Saraceni nuncupati. qui ergo psalmos istos terreno ingenio intellegendos putant, id uolunt ex persona populi captiui prophetam conquestum fuisse, quod in habitaculis Cedar longus ei fuerit incolatus. sed uirtutem uerbi non intellegentes nec prophetae spiritum sentientes auctoritatem nominis ad confirmationem stultae opinionis assumunt, psalmo omnino nihil, quod captiuitati populi congruat, continente.
But this prophet's feeling is not much different from that of Job and Jeremiah. For he complains not of his sojourning, but of his prolonged sojourning. For after the complaint of this long sojourning of his, there follows on what he says, "Woe is me, that my sojourning has been prolonged," this: "I have dwelt with those who dwell in Kedar." Kedar is a nation of the Ishmaelites dwelling in the desert, whose borders extend as far as the Medes and Persians. For Kedar was a son of Ishmael, as Genesis testifies: "The firstborn," it says, "of Ishmael, Nebaioth, and Kedar." These are now called Saracens. Those, then, who think these psalms are to be understood with an earthly mind want the prophet to have complained in the person of the captive people that his sojourning in the dwellings of Kedar was long. But not understanding the force of the word nor perceiving the spirit of the prophet, they take the authority of the name to confirm a foolish opinion, though the psalm contains nothing at all that fits the captivity of the people.
119.21CSEL 22:557–558
Cedar enim secundum hebraicam linguam id est, quod nobiscum pronuntiatur obscuratio. in hoc enim obscuro tenebrosoque corporum habitaculo inuisibilis illa animarum nostrarum conformatio continetur, habetque hunc contagiosi incolatus sui carcerem caelestis naturae captiua generositas. meminit huius tabernaculi sponsa illa in Canticis canticorum dicens: nigra sum et formonsa sum, filia Hierusalem, sicut tabernaculum Cedar: ex tabernaculis huius obscuritatis confessa se nigram, sed non abnuens, quia Christi sponsa sit, se esse formosam. omnis enim se spondens Christo in specie iam consistit aeterna. in his nos inluminari tabernaculis dominus praecepit dicens: lucerna corporis tui est oculus tuus, et si lumen. quod in te est, tenebrae sunt tenebrae ipsae quantae sunt? et rursum: uos estis filii luminis. non filii tenebrarum.
For Kedar in the Hebrew language is what we pronounce "darkening." For in this dark and gloomy dwelling of bodies the invisible form of our souls is contained, and the captive nobility of a heavenly nature has this prison of its contagious sojourning. The bride in the Song of Songs remembers this tent, saying: "I am black and I am beautiful, daughter of Jerusalem, like the tent of Kedar": confessing herself black from the tents of this darkness, but not denying that she is beautiful, because she is the bride of Christ. For everyone who betroths himself to Christ already stands in an eternal beauty. The Lord commanded us to be enlightened in these tents, saying: "The lamp of your body is your eye, and if the light that is in you is darkness, how great is that darkness?" and again: "You are sons of light, not sons of darkness."
119.22CSEL 22:558
Seruauit autem etiam hanc rationem propheta, ut cum habitationibus Cedar habitauerit, non in habitationibus. licet enim sancti in carne uiuant, tamen, si habeant arma militiae non carnalia, sed potentia deo, cohabitabunt tabernaculis Cedar, non inhabitabunt. peregrinantes enim a corpore ut dei accolae audient ab apostolo: uos autem non estis in carne, sed in spiritu; si tamen spiritus dei habitat in uobis. sic ergo habitauit, ut cohabitaret habitantibus, ostendens in eo, quem doleat, incolatu se esse peregrinum. et quia iniquorum consortium et cohabitationem habitantium in obscuritatibus odisset, quamquam de futuro iam questus esset, adhuc etiam de praeterito ait: multum incola fuit anima mea, in multis scilicet tribulationibus labiorum iniquorum et linguae dolosae, ob quas ad dominum proclamauit.
And the prophet kept this distinction too, that he dwelt with the dwellers of Kedar, not in their dwellings. For though the saints live in the flesh, yet if they have weapons of warfare that are not fleshly but mighty for God, they will live alongside the tents of Kedar, not dwell in them. For being away from the body as God's sojourners, they will hear from the apostle: "But you are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit, if indeed the Spirit of God dwells in you." So he dwelt in such a way as to live alongside those who dwelt there, showing that in the sojourning he grieves over he is a stranger. And because he hated the fellowship of the wicked and living alongside those who dwell in darkness, although he had already complained about the future, he still says about the past: "My soul has long been a sojourner," namely in the many distresses of wicked lips and a deceitful tongue, for which he cried out to the Lord.
119.23CSEL 22:558–559
Sed cuiusmodi incolatus sibi fuerit, ostendit dicens: cum his, qui oderant pacem, eram pacificus. hoc proprium et dignum prophetae est, simultates et motus naturae alienae uoluntatis suae pace cohibere et infidas quasque animorum ac turbulentas affectiones omni placabilitatis modestia continere. et haec dominus docuit pacificans ipse in semet, quae in caelis et in terra sunt, orare pro persequentibus, neminem odisse. amare inimicos. et apostolus monet: si possibile est in uobis, cum omnibus hominibus pacem habentes. et dominus hanc ueluti praeceptorum summam consignat: pacem meam do uobis, pacem meam relinquo uobis. haec igitur conseruabit corda nostra in Christo, haec nos patriarchis adaequabit, haec etiam eos, qui pacem oderunt, per pacem obsequentes in pace retinebit.
But he showed what kind of sojourning he had, saying: "With those who hated peace I was peaceable." This is proper and worthy of a prophet: to restrain the quarrels and movements of another's nature by the peace of his own will, and to hold in check all faithless and turbulent feelings of minds with every modesty of gentleness. And the Lord taught these things, making peace in himself for what is in heaven and on earth, to pray for persecutors, to hate no one, to love enemies. And the apostle warns: "If possible, so far as it depends on you, have peace with all men." And the Lord seals this as the sum, as it were, of his precepts: "My peace I give you, my peace I leave you." This, then, will guard our hearts in Christ; this will make us equal to the patriarchs; this will keep in peace, by peace, even those who hate peace, as they come to obey.
119.24CSEL 22:559
Sed prophetae restat et aliud officium. doctrinam scilicet dei uniuersis constanter ingerere et uerbum uitae aeternae iugiter praedicare. non inmemor quoque huius fuit ministerii; nam ait: cum loquebar illis, inpugnabant me gratis. erat quidem pacificus cum pacis inimicis, sed praedicationem pacis ipsius oderant pacis inimici et ad doctrinam dei commouebantur, quos per modestiam prophetae silentium eius in pace cohibebat; atque ita cum inimicis pacis propheta pacificus est et praedicare pacem propheta non desinit, sed pacis praedicatorem inimici pacis inpugnant.
But another duty remains for the prophet: namely to press God's teaching steadily on all and to preach the word of eternal life continually. He was not unmindful of this ministry either; for he says: "When I spoke to them, they attacked me without cause." He was indeed peaceable with the enemies of peace, but the enemies of peace hated the preaching of peace itself and were stirred up against the teaching of God, they whom the prophet's silence, through his modesty, had held in peace; and so the prophet is peaceable with the enemies of peace, and the prophet does not cease to preach peace, but the enemies of peace attack the preacher of peace.
Tractates 120
120.1CSEL 22:559–560
Secundum hunc psalmum canticum graduum aliqui referendum esse ad personam domini et saluatoris nostri existimant aptantes maxime ei dictum hoc: per diem sol non uret te. neque luna per noctem. inpletam enim hanc prophetiam eo tempore putant, quo in passione domini sole obscurato nox intercessit. sed iudicio horum nihil decerpimus. neque enim sensum intellegentiae huius arguimus, uniuscuiusque arbitrio relinquentes, quid ex his, quae aut legerint aut intellexerint, sequi magis uelint. nos tamen non potuimus sermonem nostrum nisi his, quae intellegebamus, aptare.
Some think this second Song of Ascents should be referred to the person of our Lord and Savior, applying to him above all this saying: "By day the sun will not burn you, nor the moon by night." For they think this prophecy was fulfilled at the time when, in the Lord's passion, the sun was darkened and night came on. But we take nothing away from their judgment. For we do not reprove the sense of this understanding, leaving it to each one's choice which he prefers to follow of the things he has read or understood. We, however, could fit our discourse only to what we understood.
120.2CSEL 22:560
Leuaui oculos meos in montes. humanae mentis natura ea est, ut. si cogitatione aliquid contemplemur, talem se nobis unaquaeque species exhibeat, qualem eam et cogitando formemus. quoquo enim mentis nostrae oculos intenderimus, id ipsum, in quo defixi sunt, referunt ad sensum. et ut planius intellegi id, quod dictum est, possit, adferemus exemplum. si quis hiemis die uer cogitauerit et ornamentum eius lumine mentis inspexerit, oblitterata hieme, in qua sit atque algeat. totum ei in sensu suo uer cum habitu suo ornatuque consistet. adeo mentis oculi oculis corporis praestant, ut ineunte in nos obliuione praesentium totos nos obtineat quidam quasi animo praesumptus usus absentium. hoc igitur quo spectet, mox uidebimus.
"I lifted up my eyes to the mountains." The nature of the human mind is such that, if we contemplate something in thought, each form presents itself to us such as we shape it by thinking. For wherever we direct the eyes of our mind, they bring back to the sense the very thing on which they are fixed. And so that what has been said can be understood more plainly, we shall give an example. If someone on a winter's day thinks of spring and gazes at its beauty with the light of the mind, forgetting the winter in which he is and is cold, the whole of spring with its dress and adornment will stand in his sense. So far do the eyes of the mind surpass the eyes of the body that, as forgetfulness of present things comes over us, a kind of enjoyment of absent things, taken in advance by the mind, holds us entirely. We shall soon see where this tends.
120.3CSEL 22:560–561
Leuat in montes propheta oculos. quosnam oculos? nempe de quibus scriptum est: reuela oculos meos, et cognoscam mirabilia de lege tua; et rursum: praeceptum domini lucidum, inluminans oculos. numquid non isti oculi nostri corporali lumine ad contemplandum accensi sunt? numquid non naturam uidendi sortiti sunt? quae inluminatio uel quae reuelatio erit necessaria? deinde quae uisuri mirabilia in lege? nisi forte in casis festa frondium, in templo pecudum sanguinem, in pascha agni uictimam, in summa religionis sabbati otium? et, ut puto, fieri haec ab his, qui spectatores aderant, uidebantur. non ergo in id reuelandi sunt oculi, quod cernebatur, sed ad id, quod intellegi optabatur in lege.
The prophet lifts his eyes to the mountains. Which eyes? Surely those of which it is written: "Unveil my eyes, and I shall know the wonders of your law"; and again: "The commandment of the Lord is bright, enlightening the eyes." Are not these eyes of ours kindled with bodily light for seeing? Have they not received the nature of seeing? What enlightening or what unveiling will be necessary? Then, what wonders will they see in the law? Unless perhaps the feast of leaves in huts, the blood of cattle in the temple, the victim of the lamb at the Passover, in short, the rest of the Sabbath in religion? And, as I think, these things were seen to be done by those who were present as spectators. So the eyes are not to be unveiled for what was seen, but for what was longed to be understood in the law.
120.4CSEL 22:561
Mentis ergo oculos propheta eleuauit in montes. quosnam in montes? non utique in hos lucis atque aris profanatos et conuentibus impios, neque illos siluis horridos, saxis nudos, praeruptis inuios, niuibus concretos; quid enim in his admirationis aut spei situm est? sed montes accipimus propheticos libros ex terra in altum eleuatos, per quos sit in superiora conscensus et gradus in aeterna. poterimus autem et montes existimare angelica ministeria, caelorum uirtutes et potestates, quarum ministerio nobis in sublimia praestatur ascensus. si enim secundum Danielum dominus ipse mons magnus est, non ambigendum est montes eos nuncupari, qui praecepti eius et uoluntatis et communicandae in nos beatitudinis sunt ministri.
So the prophet lifted the eyes of his mind to the mountains. To which mountains? Certainly not to these profaned by groves and altars and impious with assemblies, nor to those rough with forests, bare with rocks, impassable with cliffs, frozen with snows; for what is there in these to wonder at or hope for? But we take the mountains to be the prophetic books, raised from the earth on high, through which there is a climbing to higher things and a step into eternal things. We may also think of the mountains as the angelic ministries, the powers and authorities of heaven, by whose ministry ascent to the heights is granted us. For if, according to Daniel, the Lord himself is a great mountain, there is no doubt that those are called mountains who are ministers of his precept and will and of the blessedness to be shared with us.
120.5CSEL 22:561–562
In hos igitur montes propheta oculos cordis eleuans horumque intra se omnium monita, ministeria, officia. dona contemplans et in his intellegentiae suae lumen intendens reddidit sensui suo contemplatae speciei integram perfectamque naturam et totum id, quod cogitatione uiderat, mente continuit sciens, unde uenturum esset auxilium ei, dicens: unde ueniet auxilium mihi. statimque sibi beata confessione respondit: auxilium meum a domino, qui fecit caelum et terram. ad montes quidem oculi eleuantur, quia per eos est doctrinae ministerium, profectus, ascensus. sed cum confitendum sit, unde ueniat auxilium: auxilium a domino est, qui fecit caelum et terram. haec felix fides est, haec uera confessio. haec spes aeterna et caelestis benedictionis digna muneribus.
So the prophet, lifting the eyes of his heart to these mountains and contemplating within himself the warnings, ministries, offices, and gifts of all of them, and directing on them the light of his understanding, gave back to his sense the whole and perfect nature of the form he had contemplated and held in mind all that he had seen in thought, knowing from where help would come to him, saying: "From where will my help come?" And at once he answered himself with a blessed confession: "My help is from the Lord, who made heaven and earth." The eyes are lifted to the mountains, because through them is the ministry of teaching, progress, and ascent. But when one must confess from where help comes, help is from the Lord, who made heaven and earth. This is happy faith, this is true confession, this is eternal hope, worthy of the gifts of heavenly blessing.
120.6CSEL 22:562–563
Denique quia prophetia omnis in spiritu est, statim beatam hanc eius confessionem per personam prophetae sancti spiritus consecuta benedictio est: non det in commotionem pedem tuum, neque dormitet, qui custodit te. sensus ipse significat conuersionem factam esse personae. ad eum enim, qui superius locutus est, sermo conuersus est: ne det in commotionem. quis? nempe qui fecit caelum et terram. pedem tuum. cuius? quaeremus. namque eius, qui leuauit oculos in montes et qui confessus est, quod auxilium esset a domino. sed et illud, ne det, optantis et benedicentis affectus est. et quis optabit? ille scilicet, qui nobis est praeter dominum alius aduocatus, de quo ait: et alium aduocatum mittam uobis, qui et loquitur in prophetis. quid ergo aduocatus hic loquitur? confessorem scilicet fidei huius speique benedicit: ne det in commotionem pedem tuum, neque dormitet, qui custodit te. sed utraque haec indigna deo sunt, ut et commotioni tradat et dormitet et post custodiae uigiliam ex quadam laboris continuatione requiescat. sed antequam id attingimus, quid in pede significationis sit, tractandum est.
Then, since all prophecy is in the Spirit, at once this blessed confession of his is followed, through the person of the prophet, by the blessing of the Holy Spirit: "May he not give your foot to be moved, nor may he who keeps you slumber." The sense itself shows that a change of person has been made. For the word is turned to him who spoke above: "May he not give to be moved." Who? Surely he who made heaven and earth. "Your foot." Whose? We shall ask. Namely his who lifted his eyes to the mountains and confessed that his help was from the Lord. But "may he not give" is also the feeling of one who wishes and blesses. And who will wish this? He, namely, who is for us another Advocate besides the Lord, of whom he says: "And I will send you another Advocate," who also speaks in the prophets. What, then, does this Advocate say? He blesses the confessor of this faith and hope: "May he not give your foot to be moved, nor may he who keeps you slumber." But both these things are unworthy of God: that he should hand over to being moved, and slumber, and after the watch of keeping rest from some continuance of labor. But before we come to that, we must treat what is meant by the foot.
120.7CSEL 22:563
Pes est pars corporis omne corpus in res efficiendas agendasque circumferens. et quia scriptura per corporalia spiritalia docet et inuisibilia per uisibilia demonstrat, sub pedis nomine motus mentis nostrae incessusque significat. ut in hoc eodem propheta: mei autem paulo minus moti sunt pedes. utique hi semper carnales mouentur in corpore: et quomodo periculi res est, quod paene sint moti, quorum ut semper moueantur proprium officium est? sed et in euangeliis dominus pedes alios significans dextrum scandalizantem iussit abscidi dicens: et si pes tuus dexter scandalizat te, abscide eum. numquid si in pede dextro scandalum est, minus scandalizabit sinister? aut quid illa pars corporis potest temptationis adferre, cum ipsa absque aliquo adpetitionis affectu solum in se habeat ministerium necessariae seruitutis? ergo ut oculi mentis, ita et pedes intellegendi sunt habentes in se et intellegentiae uisum et uoluntatis motionem.
The foot is the part of the body that carries the whole body about to the things to be done and accomplished. And because Scripture teaches spiritual things through bodily ones and shows invisible things through visible ones, under the name of foot it signifies the movements and goings of our mind: as in this same prophet, "But my feet were almost moved." Surely these fleshly feet are always moved in the body: and how is it a dangerous thing that they were almost moved, when it is their proper office always to be moved? And in the gospels too the Lord, signifying other feet, commanded the right foot that causes stumbling to be cut off, saying: "And if your right foot causes you to stumble, cut it off." If there is a stumbling block in the right foot, will the left cause less stumbling? Or what temptation can that part of the body bring, since without any feeling of desire it has in itself only the ministry of necessary service? So, like the eyes of the mind, so also feet must be understood, having in themselves both the sight of understanding and the movement of the will.
120.8CSEL 22:563–564
Non est autem intellegendum, quod ideo ista benedictio sit: ne det in commotionem pedem tuum, tamquam deus aliquos tradat in uitia, in quae pedibus corruptae mentis inuehimur. non ille nos tradet: sed cum ab eo per peccata discessimus, et cum in peccatoribus ipse non habitet, discessionem nostram ab eo consequitur abscessio eius a nobis, quia nos ab eo per peccata discedimus. et discedente eo a nobis in omnes delictorum foueas incidimus et per amplissimam mortis uiam currimus dominatui daemonum subditi, quibus nos dei a nobis abscessio derelinquit. et desolatio eius idcirco traditio est. quia peccatores obtinere diabolus nisi deo ab his abscedente non poterit.
But it must not be understood that this blessing, "May he not give your foot to be moved," is given as though God hands some over to the vices into which we are carried by the feet of a corrupted mind. He will not hand us over; but when we have departed from him through sins, and since he does not dwell in sinners, his withdrawal from us follows our departure from him, because we depart from him through sins. And when he withdraws from us, we fall into all the pits of offenses and run along the broad road of death, subjected to the domination of demons, to whom God's withdrawal from us leaves us. And his abandonment is therefore a handing over, because the devil cannot take hold of sinners unless God withdraws from them.
120.9CSEL 22:564–565
Ceterum nobis penes eum manentibus uel eo in nobis manente peruigil custodia est et indefessa munitio. uerum si per teporem fidei dormiamus, dormit et ipse nobiscum. non enim in aeterna uirtute somnus aut requies est, cuius angeli et nomine et natura uigilantes sunt; haec enim terrenis sunt corporibus necessaria: sed quia secundum fidem nostram aut uigilantem aut dormientem dei auxilium nobiscum aut uigilabit aut dormiet, idcirco dominus frequenter et uigilans significatur et dormiens. quo exemplo illud in hoc eodem propheta dictum est: cum sancto sanctus eris et cum peruerso subuerteris. numquid deus non semper sanctus est, ut etiam aliquando peruersus sit? non utique. non enim quidquam nisi bonum in eo et aeternum est: sed quia secundum uniuscuiusque mores ac studium unicuique deus adiacet, idcirco et peruersis auersus est et sanctus in sanctis est.
But while we remain with him, or while he remains in us, there is a watchful guard and an unwearying defense. But if through lukewarmness of faith we sleep, he too sleeps with us. For there is no sleep or rest in the eternal power, whose angels are watchers both in name and in nature; for these things are necessary for earthly bodies: but because God's help will either watch or sleep with us according to our faith, watching or sleeping, therefore the Lord is often represented both as watching and as sleeping. On this pattern it is said in this same prophet: "With the holy you will be holy, and with the perverse you will be overturned." Is God not always holy, so that he should sometimes be perverse? Certainly not. For there is nothing in him but what is good and eternal: but because God is near each one according to each one's conduct and zeal, therefore he is both turned away from the perverse and holy among the holy.
120.10CSEL 22:565–566
Atque ut ostenderet ex nostra potius ad fidem dormitatione somnum esse custodiae neque in naturam custodiae caelestis somni requiem conuenire, quia indefessa sit et aeterna, statim conexuit: ecce non dormitabit neque obdormiet, qui custodit Israhel. imprecatus superius, ne dormitaret, nunc neque dormitare neque dormire ait; dormitationem superius ex nostra ab eo discessione significans, nunc autem neque dormitare neque dormire, quia sit aeternitas indefessa, demonstrans. sed quis hic est, qui neque dormitet neque dormiat? ille scilicet, qui custodit Israhel. Israhel Genesis exponit eum esse, qui deum uiderit. Iacob enim patriarcha post luctam, quam cum deo habuerat, hoc nomen accepit. ultra humanam naturam deum contuens fidei suae oculis dignus hoc nomine est. deum autem adeo uidit, ut benedici se ab eo precaretur. meminit et Paulus esse nunc in plebe gentium, id est in populo ecclesiae Israhel dicens: pax super eum et super Israhel dei, ne forte nomen hoc antiquae tantum illius plebis fuisse existimaretur. ergo si ille non dormit, qui custodit Israhel, et proprium Israhel nomen est deum uidentis: ille necesse est custodietur, qui eleuatis ad montes oculis uidit et dixit: auxilium meum a domino, qui fecit caelum et terram. inpenditur ergo fidei huic caelestis custodia et aeternae uigiliae munitionem confessio ista sortitur, quae sectanda, obtinenda, retinenda est, numquam custodia eius in nos, quem sic confitebimur, dormiente.
And to show that the sleep of the guard comes rather from our drowsiness toward faith, and that the rest of sleep does not fit the nature of the heavenly guard, because it is unwearying and eternal, he at once joined: "Behold, he who keeps Israel will not slumber nor sleep." Having prayed above that he not slumber, now he says he will neither slumber nor sleep; signifying slumber above as coming from our departure from him, but now showing that he neither slumbers nor sleeps, because he is unwearying eternity. But who is this who neither slumbers nor sleeps? He, namely, who keeps Israel. Genesis explains that Israel is one who has seen God. For the patriarch Jacob received this name after the struggle he had had with God. Seeing God beyond human nature with the eyes of his faith, he is worthy of this name. And he so saw God that he prayed to be blessed by him. Paul too remembers that Israel is now among the people of the nations, that is, in the people of the church, saying: "Peace upon him and upon the Israel of God," lest perhaps this name be thought to have belonged only to that ancient people. So if he who keeps Israel does not sleep, and Israel is properly the name of one who sees God, he must be kept who, with eyes lifted to the mountains, saw and said: "My help is from the Lord, who made heaven and earth." So heavenly keeping is spent on this faith, and this confession receives the defense of eternal watchfulness, a confession to be pursued, held, and kept, since the keeping of him whom we so confess never sleeps toward us.
120.11CSEL 22:566–567
Ac ne alicuius alterius insomnem custodiam demonstrari existimaremus, subicitur: dominus custodiet te, ille utique, qui fecit caelum et terram. dehinc custodiae ipsius ratio distincta est: dominus protectio tua super manum dexterae tuae. iam et superius diximus, per ea, quae corporalia sunt, significari incorporalia. infirmitas enim intellegentiae nostrae consequi inuisibilia non potest, nisi per uisibilium conparationem: ut nunc id, quod dicitur, sensum nostrum nisi per nomen manus et dexterae non adit, quamquam hic contra naturae intellegentiam manus et dextera posita sit. sic enim dicitur: dominus protectio tua super manum dexterae tuae. absoluta res esset, si dictum ita esset: super manum dexteram tuam. at uero cum ita dicatur: super manum dextrae tuae, significari uidetur dextera, habens manus et dexteram et sinistram. hoc non recipit nec natura hominis nec sensus. uerum semper scriptura dexteram partem optimam atque utilissimam demonstrat. et quidem euangelia per eos, qui ad dexteram et sinistram sunt, significantiam intellegentiae utriusque monstrabunt. manum uero effectum omnis operis accipimus. unde illud etiam ab hoc eodem propheta sic dictum est: libera me de ore leonis de manu canis unicam meam. neque enim in hoc animal oblatrans et rabidum pars huius corporis conueniret: sed ab operibus se malitiae liberari deprecatur. ergo quia aduersantes nobis daemonum uirtutes optima et ualidissima fidei nostrae opera debilitare et conuulnerare contendunt, idcirco super manum dextrae custodia dei uigilatura promittitur, ut inlibata in nobis bonae uoluntatis opera perseuerent, quibus manentibus aeterni illius et beatissimi temporis regno abstersa omni infirmitate corporeae labis utemur.
And lest we think that the sleepless guard of someone else is shown, there is added: "The Lord will keep you," he, that is, who made heaven and earth. Then the manner of this keeping is set out: "The Lord is your protection upon the hand of your right hand." We have already said above that incorporeal things are signified by bodily ones. For the weakness of our understanding cannot reach invisible things except by comparison with visible ones: as now what is said does not reach our sense except through the name of hand and right hand, although here hand and right hand are placed contrary to the understanding of nature. For it is said thus: "The Lord is your protection upon the hand of your right hand." The matter would be simple if it had been said thus: "upon your right hand." But when it is said, "upon the hand of your right hand," a right side seems to be meant that has hands both right and left. Neither human nature nor sense admits this. But Scripture always shows the right side as the best and most useful. And indeed the gospels will show the meaning of both understandings through those who are on the right and on the left. And we take the hand to be the effect of every work. Hence that too was said by this same prophet thus: "Deliver me from the mouth of the lion, my only one from the hand of the dog." For this part of the body would not fit that barking and rabid animal; but he prays to be delivered from the works of malice. So because the powers of demons opposing us strive to weaken and wound the best and strongest works of our faith, therefore God's guard is promised to watch upon the hand of the right, so that the works of good will may persevere unharmed in us; and while these remain, we shall enjoy the kingdom of that eternal and most blessed time, with every weakness of bodily stain wiped away.
120.12CSEL 22:567
Nam id nobis in eo, quod sequitur, prophetae spiritus pollicetur dicens: per diem sol non uret te neque luna per noctem. elementorum horum natura hanc in se efficientiam habet, ut unumquodque eorum in suo tempore humanorum corporum uires per demutationem inbecillae in nobis substantiae infirmet, ut sol calore, luna frigore adurat, sitque per annuum cursum talis eorundem conuersio, ut hiberno tempore sol non adurat luna adurente, sed soluat, rursumque aestiuis mensibus sol urat, et luna dissoluat.
For the spirit of the prophet promises us this in what follows, saying: "By day the sun will not burn you, nor the moon by night." The nature of these elements has this effect in itself, that each of them in its own time weakens the strength of human bodies through the change of the weak substance in us, so that the sun burns with heat, the moon with cold, and their alternation through the yearly course is such that in winter the sun does not burn, while the moon burns, but relaxes; and again in the summer months the sun burns and the moon relaxes.
120.13CSEL 22:567–568
Qui itaque haec putant corporaliter intellegenda, quaero, quid asserant prophetam ei, qui in montes oculos suos eleuauerit, polliceri in eo, quod dicitur: per diem sol non uret te, neque luna per noctem? non enim manente natura corporis nostri natura quoque elementorum demutabilis fiet, ut non naturae suae in naturam nostram consuetudine perseuerent. aut numquid quisquam audebit hanc sibi in hoc saeculo firmitatem corporis sperare, ne aduri nocte ac die possit, beato patriarcha Iacob perustum se noctis rigore et calore diei conquerente cum dicit: et fui diei perustus calore et gelu noctis.
So I ask those who think these things are to be understood bodily what they assert the prophet promises to one who has lifted his eyes to the mountains in saying, "By day the sun will not burn you, nor the moon by night"? For while the nature of our body remains, the nature of the elements will not become changeable so that they do not continue in the custom of their nature toward our nature. Or will anyone dare to hope for himself in this age such firmness of body that he cannot be burned by night and day, when the blessed patriarch Jacob complains that he was scorched by the cold of night and the heat of day, saying: "And I was scorched by the heat of the day and the frost of the night"?
120.14CSEL 22:568
Sed propheta nunc uel spiritus per prophetam nouit illam beatitudinem temporum, in qua a nobis omnis demutatio corporeae infirmitatis abscedet, in qua non frigus, non calor, non nox et demutatio, sed aeterna dies et beata temperies sit iustitiae in nos sole dominante. cuius temporis requiem iam in deserto dominus praeformans populo suo diurnum calorem columna nubis et nocturnum frigus ac tenebras columna ignis temperabat. in hac igitur aeterna temporum et beata temperie, quisque domini custodiam promeruerit, permanebit, ne natura corporis gelu lunae et calore solis uratur, sed saeculi huius malis et iniuriis liberatus, in aeternis et beatis et temperatis quiescens glorificati corporis sui sumat solidam indemutabilemque naturam.
But the prophet now, or the Spirit through the prophet, knows that blessedness of the times in which every change of bodily weakness will depart from us, in which there will be no cold, no heat, no night and change, but eternal day and a blessed mildness, with the sun of righteousness ruling over us. Prefiguring the rest of that time, the Lord already in the desert tempered for his people the heat of day by the pillar of cloud and the cold and darkness of night by the pillar of fire. In this eternal and blessed mildness of the times, then, whoever has deserved the Lord's keeping will remain, so that the nature of the body is not burned by the frost of the moon and the heat of the sun, but, freed from the evils and injuries of this age, resting in eternal, blessed, and mild things, it may take on the solid and unchangeable nature of its glorified body.
120.15CSEL 22:568–569
Sequitur deinde: dominus custodiet te ab omni malo. et a quibus malis custodiet dominus? non opinor ab his, quae putantur: haec enim sunt infirmitati nostrae et corpori debita, mori, infirmari, egere; quae si mala essent, et Abel uiueret nec Iob cruciatus esset nec Petrus pecunia, quam in eleemosynam poscebatur, eguisset. ergo fidelem animam ab omni malo dominus custodit, id est, ne eam diaboli tinea corrumpat, ne fur obrepat, ne canis oblatret, ne lupus laceret. ne ursus desaeuiat, ne pardus insiliat, ne tigris aduolet, ne leo uastet. haec enim nunc sunt diaboli ministeria, haec omnia eius in tempore saeculi huius officia sunt, uitiis consumere, blandimentis subrepere, obtrectationibus lacerare, ambitione insilire, lasciuiis aduolare et tota uirtutis suae potestate uastare. ab hoc omni igitur malo dei expectanda custodia est. et quia in animam maxime saeuiat — nam debitum nobis est, ut aduersus eum pugnemus in corpore, non est enim nisi ex concertatione uictoria - idcirco subsequitur: custodiet animam tuam dominus, ne quid tot tantisque superius memoratis malis in eam sit potestatis.
Then follows: "The Lord will keep you from every evil." And from what evils will the Lord keep? Not, I think, from those that are thought evils: for these are owed to our weakness and body, to die, to be sick, to be in need; and if these were evils, Abel would be living, Job would not have been tortured, nor would Peter have lacked the money he was asked for as alms. So the Lord keeps the faithful soul from every evil, that is, so that the devil's moth may not corrupt it, the thief creep up, the dog bark, the wolf tear, the bear rage, the leopard spring, the tiger fly at, the lion lay waste. For these are now the devil's ministries, all these are his offices in the time of this age: to consume with vices, to creep up with flatteries, to tear with slanders, to spring with ambition, to fly at with lusts, and to lay waste with all the power of his strength. From all this evil, then, God's keeping must be expected. And because he rages above all against the soul, for it is our duty to fight against him in the body, since there is no victory except from a contest, there follows: "The Lord will keep your soul," so that none of the many and great evils mentioned above may have power over it.
120.16CSEL 22:569–570
Tenuit autem propheticus sermo ordinem suum dicens: dominus custodiet exitum tuum et introitum tuum ex hoc nunc usque in saeculum. non enim temporis huius et saeculi est ista custodia, non aduri sole atque luna et ab omni malo conseruari; sed futuri boni expectatio est, cum exeuntes de corpore ad introitum illum regni caelestis per custodiam domini fideles omnes reseruabuntur, in sinu scilicet interim Abrahae collocati, quo adire impios interiectum chaos inhibet, quo usque introeundi rursum in regnum caelorum tempus adueniat. custodiet ergo dominus exitum, dum de corpore exeuntes secreti ab impiis interiecto chao quiescant. custodiet et introitum, dum nos in aeternum illud et beatum regnum introducit. ipse est enim, qui ait: ego sum ianua; et: nemo uadit ad patrem nisi per me, id est dominus noster Iesus Christus, qui est benedictus in saecula saeculorum. amen.
The prophetic word kept its order, saying: "The Lord will keep your going out and your coming in, from this time forth and for ever." For this keeping, not being burned by sun and moon and being preserved from every evil, does not belong to this time and age; but it is the expectation of a future good, when all the faithful, going out of the body, will be kept by the Lord's keeping for that entrance into the heavenly kingdom, meanwhile placed in Abraham's bosom, where the chasm set between prevents the impious from approaching, until the time of entering again into the kingdom of heaven comes. So the Lord will keep the going out, while those going out of the body rest, separated from the impious by the chasm set between; and he will keep the coming in, when he leads us into that eternal and blessed kingdom. For he is the one who says, "I am the door," and, "No one goes to the Father except through me," that is, our Lord Jesus Christ, who is blessed for ever and ever. Amen.
Tractates 121
121.1CSEL 22:570–571
Qui spe caelestis desiderii detinetur, nihil obscuritatis in psalmo habebit; ex suo enim sensu intellegentiam prophetiae magniloquentiae consequetur, namque cum se meminerit scriptum dei coheredem et consortem aeternorum bonorum, et similem angelis ex resurrectione renouandum et corruptione deposita in gloriam dei ac domini nostri Iesu Christi corporis conformandum futurumque incolam ciuitatis caelestis uiuis lapidibus extructae, de qua scriptum est in euangelio, cum dominus iurari per caelum inhibuisset dicens: neque per Hierosolymam, quia ciuitas est regis magni — non utique eam significans, quae prophetas occidit et lapidat, sed eam, cuius beatus apostolus Paulus ita meminit: uos estis ciues sanctorum et domestici dei, superaedificati super fundamentum apostolorum — cumque legerit, ea, quae nunc sunt, ex parte esse nosque per speculum interim et in aenigmate uidere, perfecto autem ueniente ea, quae nunc pro parte sint, destruenda, et facie ad faciem, tamquam corporali uisu, ea, quae tum nobis sint uisibilia, contemplaturos, ubi non aegritudo, non mors, non maestitia, non terror sit: haec cum quis adnuntiata ab angelis, praeformata in lege, exposita a prophetis, a domino exemplis repraesentata, praedicata ab apostolis, ipsi sibi haec eadem per fidem possibilia cognouerit, proclamabit necesse est exemplo prophetae: laetatus sum in his, quae dicta sunt mihi.
One who is held by the hope of heavenly desire will find nothing obscure in this psalm; for from his own sense he will attain the understanding of the prophecy's lofty speech. For when he remembers that he is written down as a coheir of God and a sharer of eternal goods, to be renewed like the angels by the resurrection and, corruption laid aside, to be conformed to the glory of the body of our God and Lord Jesus Christ, and to be a dweller in the heavenly city built of living stones, of which it is written in the gospel, when the Lord forbade swearing by heaven, saying, "nor by Jerusalem, for it is the city of the great King" (not meaning that city which kills and stones the prophets, but that which blessed Paul the apostle mentions thus: "You are fellow citizens of the saints and members of God's household, built upon the foundation of the apostles"); and when he has read that the things that now are are in part and that we see meanwhile through a mirror and in a riddle, but when the perfect comes, what is now in part is to be done away, and we shall contemplate face to face, as with bodily sight, the things that will then be visible to us, where there is no sickness, no death, no sorrow, no terror: when anyone has recognized that these things, announced by angels, prefigured in the law, set forth by the prophets, represented by the Lord in examples, preached by the apostles, are possible for him through faith, he must cry out after the prophet's example: "I rejoiced in the things that were said to me."
121.2CSEL 22:571
Sed quae sunt illa, quae dicta sunt, ex quibus laetitia suscepta est? nempe id, quod sequitur: in domum domini ibimus. hinc gaudetur, hinc exultatur, quia hac dicta sunt, quod eundum in domum domini sit. domus domini quae sit, psalmo altero docuit dicens: quoniam elegit dominus Sion, praeelegit eam in habitationem sibi. haec requies mea in saecula saeculorum, hic habitabo, quoniam praeelegi eam: non utique, ut diximus, hanc terrenam et caducam et poenas impietatis suae luentem, sed illam liberam et caelestem Hierusalem, quia eadem et Sion est, per cuius incolatum, quia domus dei est, nos quoque ciues sanctorum et domestici dei sumus. hinc ergo laetitia est, quod dictum sit in domum domini nos ituros.
But what are those things that were said, from which joy was received? Surely what follows: "We will go into the house of the Lord." From this comes gladness, from this exultation, because these things were said, that we are to go into the house of the Lord. What the house of the Lord is he taught in another psalm, saying: "For the Lord has chosen Zion, he has chosen it for his dwelling. This is my rest for ever and ever; here I will dwell, for I have chosen it": not, as we said, this earthly and perishable one, paying the penalties of its impiety, but that free and heavenly Jerusalem, which is also Zion, through whose dwelling, because it is God's house, we too are fellow citizens of the saints and members of God's household. So the joy is from this, that it has been said that we shall go into the house of the Lord.
121.3CSEL 22:571–572
Sed qui ista dixerunt? ne forte ignorent neue a domo eadem, in quam nos ituros nuntiant, peregrinentur; sed dicunt: stantes erant pedes nostri in atriis Hierusalem. non incerta nuntiant, non incognita pollicentur. hanc domum desiderabilem et dilectam a multis agnouimus. nam scriptura ait: unam petii a domino, hanc requiram, ut inhabitem in domo domini omnibus diebus uitae meae, ut uideam uoluntatem domini et uisitem templum eius, et rursum: domine, dilexi decorem domus tuae et locum tabernaculi gloriae tuae. haec domus desiderabilis, hic auditus laetabilis, fundamento duodecim uiuarum gemmarum esse uiuos lapides extructos, excisos primum ad opus aedificationis a Moyse in lege, a prophetis in passionibus suis, a domino in corpore, ab apostolis in martyriis, a sancto spiritu in uirtutibus. hi aedificatores, haec aedificia, haec ciuitas. hinc stantes pedes in eius atriis, custodes scilicet, quibus datae sunt claues domus huius — dictum est enim: uobis dabo claues regni caelorum —, speciem domus ignorantibus nuntiantes beati pedes et a propheta merito laudati: quam pulcherrimi pedes euangelizantium pacem.
But who said these things? Lest perhaps they not know, or be strangers to that same house into which they announce that we shall go; but they say: "Our feet were standing in the courts of Jerusalem." They do not announce uncertain things, nor promise unknown things. We have recognized this house as desired and loved by many. For Scripture says: "One thing I have asked of the Lord, this I will seek, that I may dwell in the house of the Lord all the days of my life, that I may see the will of the Lord and visit his temple"; and again: "Lord, I have loved the beauty of your house and the place of the tabernacle of your glory." This is the desirable house, this the joyful hearing: that on a foundation of twelve living gems living stones are built, hewn first for the work of building by Moses in the law, by the prophets in their sufferings, by the Lord in the body, by the apostles in their martyrdoms, by the Holy Spirit in powers. These are the builders, these the buildings, this the city. Hence the feet standing in its courts, namely the keepers, to whom the keys of this house were given (for it was said, "To you I will give the keys of the kingdom of heaven"), announcing the form of the house to those who do not know it, blessed feet and rightly praised by the prophet: "How most beautiful are the feet of those who announce peace!"
121.4CSEL 22:572–573
Ac ne conuenire quicquam horum in eam Hierusalem, quae terrena fuit, existimaretur, id consecutum est: Hierusalem, quae aedificatur ut ciuitas. non ciuitas, sed ut ciuitas; quia illa terrenae ciuitatis aedificatio et templi extructio et tabernaculi institutio speciem illius aeternae et caelestis ciuitatis praefigurabat. et quia in omne tempus et usque ad saeculi consummationem et per omnium generationum aetatem aedificatio caelestis huius ciuitatis explenda est, ideo aedificari eam sine temporis definitione significat dicens: aedificatur ut ciuitas, donec, ut apostolus ait, intret plenitudo gentium, et tunc quod est reliquum Israhel saluabitur.
And lest any of these things be thought to fit that Jerusalem which was earthly, there followed: "Jerusalem, which is built as a city." Not a city, but as a city; because the building of that earthly city and the construction of the temple and the setting up of the tabernacle prefigured the form of that eternal and heavenly city. And because the building of this heavenly city is to be completed through all time and until the consummation of the age and through the age of all generations, he signifies that it is being built without limit of time, saying, "is built as a city," until, as the apostle says, the fullness of the nations comes in, and then the remnant of Israel will be saved.
121.5CSEL 22:573
Sed quia unum ecclesiae corpus est, non quadam corporum confusione permixtum neque singulis in indiscretum aceruum et informem cumulum unitis, sed per fidei unitatem, per caritatis societatem. per operum uoluntatisque concordiam, per sacramenti unum in omnibus donum, unum omnes sumus, in quod nos Paulus hortatur dicens: obsecro uos, fratres, ut idipsum sapiatis omnes eandem caritatem exercentes, et cum fuerit, ut scriptum est: erat autem omnium, qui credebant, cor et anima unum, tunc erimus ciuitas dei, tunc sancta Hierusalem, quia Hierusalem aedificatur ut ciuitas, cuius participatio est in idipsum. dissidentes autem a coetu sanctorum et se ab ecclesiae corpore peccatis, fastu, litibus separantes participationem sanctae istius domus non habent, quia participatio ciuitatis huius in idipsum est. ex consortio enim perfectae ciuitatis unanimes non possunt participationem in diuerso habere, sed in idipsum. omnes igitur, qui unum erunt, in ea erunt. et testis est psalmus; ait namque: illic ascenderunt tribus, tribus: non una, sed plures.
But because the body of the church is one, not mixed by some confusion of bodies nor with individuals united into an indiscriminate heap and shapeless mass, but through unity of faith, through the fellowship of love, through concord of works and will, through the one gift of the sacrament in all, we are all one, to which Paul exhorts us, saying: "I beseech you, brothers, that you all think the same thing, exercising the same love"; and when it shall be, as it is written, "The heart and soul of all who believed was one," then we shall be the city of God, then the holy Jerusalem, because Jerusalem is built as a city whose sharing is in the selfsame. But those who dissent from the assembly of the saints and separate themselves from the body of the church by sins, pride, and quarrels do not have a share in this holy house, because the sharing of this city is in the selfsame. For from the fellowship of a perfect city those of one mind cannot have a share in difference, but in the selfsame. All, then, who will be one will be in it. And the psalm is witness; for it says: "There the tribes went up, the tribes": not one, but many.
121.6CSEL 22:573–574
Sed forte sine exceptione ab uniuersis aedificanda uidebitur ciuitas, quod in tribubus cognominatis nulla fiat exceptio, eritque populis dominum nescientibus in hanc domum communis ingressus? sed intellegi istud scriptura non patitur adiciens ad id, quod dixerat: illic ascenderunt tribus, tribus domini. sunt enim, qui non sunt domini. quibus dictum est: uos estis a diabolo, et rursum: abite maledicti in praeparatum ignem diabolo et angelis eius. tribus ergo, quae erunt domini, ascendent,
But perhaps the city will seem to be built by all without exception, since no exception is made in the tribes named, and there will be a common entry into this house for peoples who do not know the Lord? But Scripture does not allow this to be understood, adding to what it had said, "There the tribes went up," "the tribes of the Lord." For there are some who are not the Lord's, to whom it was said, "You are of the devil," and again, "Depart, you cursed, into the fire prepared for the devil and his angels." So the tribes that are the Lord's will go up,
121.7CSEL 22:574
Sed forte sibi Israhel hoc esse debitum uindicabit, id est, qui secundum litteram et non secundum spiritum, qui carnalis et non caelestis, qui crucifigens dominum, non qui adorans est? sed ab hac spe repulsus est. illic enim conscenderunt tribus, tribus domini testimonium Israhel. non tribus Israhel in testimonium gentium, sed tribus domini in testimonium Israhel. tribus enim domini dixerunt: uenite ascendamus in montem domini et in domum dei Iacob: et adnuntiabit nobis uiam suam, et ambulabimus in ea. ex Sion enim exiet lex, et uerbum domini ex Hierusalem. ex Hierusalem enim exiens uerbum domini uenit ad gentes. hae introeunt in sanctam ciuitatem, in testimonium Israhel.
But perhaps Israel will claim that this is owed to it, that is, the Israel which is according to the letter and not according to the spirit, which is fleshly and not heavenly, which crucifies the Lord, not which worships him? But it has been driven back from this hope. For there the tribes went up, the tribes of the Lord, "a testimony of Israel": not the tribes of Israel as a testimony to the nations, but the tribes of the Lord as a testimony to Israel. For the tribes of the Lord said: "Come, let us go up to the mountain of the Lord and to the house of the God of Jacob, and he will announce to us his way, and we will walk in it. For out of Zion will go forth the law, and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem." For the word of the Lord, going out from Jerusalem, came to the nations. These enter the holy city, as a testimony to Israel.
121.8CSEL 22:574–575
In quod tandem testimonium? ad confitendum, inquit, nomini domini. tribus domini nomen domini confitentur. hoc autem est testimonium Israhel. ille Israhel a domino in Pharao uindicatus, in mari ablutus, in deserto angelorum cibo pastus, in lege eruditus, in prophetis obiurgatus, in natiuitate a domino per consortium corporis susceptus, in cruce si crederet saluatus. in resurrectione si confiteretur glorificatus, nihil horum suum credidit, nihil horum manere suum uoluit. habens mannam cucumeres Aegypti desiderauit; legem uitae a deo expectans uitulum adorauit; prophetas audiens occidit; uirginis partum prophetatum sibi infamauit, deum in carne non credidit, peccati remissorem falsi peccati reum arguit, emit ad mortem, in crucem sustulit; testes resurrectionis ad silentium corrupit; apostolos morte intercepit. in hoc sceleris sui testimonium tribus domini ascendunt. illi promissum est, hae obtinent. illi testamentum, sed harum hereditas est. hunc eius cruciarium deum suum tribus confitentur. in hoc itaque testimonio agnoscit Israhel, quem conpunxit, et ab accessu eius inhibetur, quem resurrexisse non credidit. hunc archangeli adorant, huic omnes uirtutes caelestes ministrant, hic tribus suas conformes gloriae corporis sui praestat. confitentur ergo nomini domini, quia deus est, quia filius unigenitus ingeniti est. in hoc itaque testimonium Israhel in domum domini tribus domini conscendunt confitentes nomini domini.
To what testimony, after all? "To confess," it says, "the name of the Lord." The tribes of the Lord confess the name of the Lord. And this is the testimony of Israel. That Israel, delivered by the Lord from Pharaoh, washed in the sea, fed in the desert with the food of angels, trained in the law, rebuked in the prophets, received by the Lord at his birth through sharing a body, saved on the cross if it had believed, glorified in the resurrection if it had confessed, believed none of these things to be its own, wished none of them to remain its own. Having manna, it longed for the cucumbers of Egypt; expecting the law of life from God, it worshipped a calf; hearing the prophets, it killed them; it defamed the virgin birth prophesied to it, did not believe God in the flesh, accused the forgiver of sin as guilty of a false sin, bought him for death, raised him on the cross; it corrupted the witnesses of the resurrection into silence; it cut off the apostles by death. As a testimony of this crime of theirs the tribes of the Lord go up. To them it was promised, these obtain it. To them the covenant, but the inheritance is these tribes'. The tribes confess this one, whom they crucified, as their God. So in this testimony Israel recognizes him whom it pierced, and is kept from approaching him whom it did not believe had risen. Him the archangels worship, him all the heavenly powers serve, he makes his tribes conformed to the glory of his body. So they confess the name of the Lord, because he is God, because he is the only-begotten Son of the unbegotten. In this testimony against Israel, then, the tribes of the Lord go up into the house of the Lord, confessing the name of the Lord.
121.9CSEL 22:575–576
Sed confessio ista iudicium est. iudicatur enim per eos, quibus dictum est: sedebitis super duodecim tribunalia iudicantes duodecim tribus Israhel. non solum hi iudicabunt. sed et regina austri condemnabit et Niniuitae condemnabunt; quia hi paenitentiam super Ionae praedicationem egerunt et illa ex ultimis terrae partibus ueniens sapientiam Salomonis audiuit: in quibus ecclesiae praefiguratio est, quae peregrina et incognita et paenitentiae credidit et sapientiam desiderauit audire.
But this confession is a judgment. For Israel is judged by those to whom it was said: "You will sit on twelve judgment seats judging the twelve tribes of Israel." Not only these will judge, but the queen of the south will also condemn, and the Ninevites will condemn; because these repented at Jonah's preaching, and she, coming from the farthest parts of the earth, heard the wisdom of Solomon: in whom there is a prefiguring of the church, which, a stranger and unknown, both believed in repentance and desired to hear wisdom.
121.10CSEL 22:576
Hic igitur sedes iudicii erit, ubi in testimonium Israhel tribus domini ascendent ad nomen domini confitendum, in ecclesia scilicet, sanctorum lapidum ciuitate, quae domus domini est. ait enim: quia illic sederunt sedes in iudicium. sedes super domum Dauid. Dauid nunc quoque, sicut in ceteris locis, domino nomen ex corpore est. scriptura enim ubicumque mentionem adsumendi corporis facit, Dauid eum solita est nuncupare, nomen ei ex parente carnis adsumens. non est autem ex eo perturbatio intellegentiae suscipienda, quod quaedam ex praeterito prophetae locuti sint; iam enim de hoc eodem in plurimis locis rationem et frequenter edidimus. deo namque conplectenti in se omnia futura pro factis sunt; et cuius tam fidelis praescientia est, ut, quae nondum gesta sunt. tamen ab eo iam pro et praeteritis habeantur et gestis. denique statim res se futuri temporis loqui propheta demonstrat
Here, then, will be the seat of judgment, where the tribes of the Lord will go up as a testimony to Israel to confess the name of the Lord: in the church, that is, the city of holy stones, which is the house of the Lord. For he says: "For there the seats sat for judgment, seats over the house of David." David here too, as in other places, is the Lord's name from his body. For wherever Scripture mentions the taking of a body, it is accustomed to call him David, taking his name from the parent of his flesh. Nor should confusion of understanding arise from the fact that the prophets spoke certain things in the past tense; for we have already given the reason for this in many places and often. For to God, who embraces all things in himself, future things are as done; and his foreknowledge is so faithful that things not yet done are already held by him as past and done. And then the prophet at once shows that he is speaking of things of future time.
121.11CSEL 22:576–577
Nam cum tamquam de praeterito commemorasset, ascendisse illic tribus domini et sedisse super sedes domus Dauid, nunc iam uelut publicae doctrinae et admonitionis affectu commonuit in futurum dicens: rogate, quae ad pacem sunt Hierusalem: ut praescientiae fidem in his, quae gesta dixisset, ostenderet, conseruaret uero temporum ordinem in gerendis. extructio itaque eius in pace est, et participatio in idipsum est, et unius mentis et fidei et caritatis domus illa est. discenda ergo est doctrina pacis. nunc enim rogate non orandi, sed interrogandi secundum proprietatem graecitatis est sermo. sed pacem discere in uoluntate est audientium. cum enim de pace eius interrogauerint, tunc laetabuntur dici sibi: in domum domini ibimus.
For when he had recalled as of the past that the tribes of the Lord had gone up there and sat on the seats of the house of David, now with the feeling, as it were, of public teaching and admonition he warned about the future, saying: "Ask for the things that are for the peace of Jerusalem": so as to show the certainty of foreknowledge in what he had said was done, but to keep the order of times in what was to be done. So its building is in peace, its sharing is in the selfsame, and that house is of one mind, faith, and love. So the teaching of peace must be learned. For "ask" here is a word not of praying but of inquiring, according to the proper sense of the Greek. But learning peace lies in the will of the hearers. For when they have inquired about its peace, then they will rejoice that it is said to them: "We will go into the house of the Lord."
121.12CSEL 22:577–578
Neque enim interrogatae pacis fructus exiguus est, quia id sequitur: et abundantia diligentibus te. perfectos fructus dilectio pacis expectat et abundantem felicium prouentuum copiam sperat. quod idipsum benedictio in Iacob ad spem fidelium praeformata significat; benedictus enim ita est fratris benedictionibus occupatis: ecce odor filii mei, sicut odor agri pleni, quem benedixit deus. ager plenus et fertilis, reddens centesimum fructum, hic aeternis copiis abundabit. et nunc quidem interim beatis fructibus abundamus. quos nobis ad speciem fructuum aeternorum ecclesiae sacramentum et pacis unitas subministrat. hoc autem sacramentum spei communis corporalium et communium rerum nominibus ostensum est, quod scientes intellegent. namque abundantiae huius et copiae idem propheta psalmo altero meminit dicens: dedisti laetitiam in corde meo, a tempore frumenti et uini et olei sui multiplicati sunt in idipsum. haec igitur abundantia est in idipsum. per hanc enim pacis et sacramentorum abundantiam beata illa pax et indeficiens et aeterna bonorum caelestium abundantia praeparatur.
Nor is the fruit of peace inquired after small, because there follows: "And abundance to those who love you." The love of peace expects perfect fruits and hopes for an abundant store of happy harvests. This very thing the blessing on Jacob, prefigured for the hope of the faithful, signifies; for he was blessed thus, having taken over his brother's blessings: "Behold, the smell of my son is like the smell of a full field, which God has blessed." A full and fertile field, yielding a hundredfold fruit, will abound with eternal riches. And now indeed we meanwhile abound with blessed fruits, which the mystery of the church and the unity of peace supply to us as a likeness of eternal fruits. This mystery of the common hope has been shown under the names of bodily and common things, which those who know will understand. For the same prophet recalls this abundance and plenty in another psalm, saying: "You have put gladness in my heart; from the time of their grain and wine and oil they are multiplied in the selfsame." This, then, is the abundance in the selfsame. For through this abundance of peace and of the sacraments that blessed and unfailing peace and eternal abundance of heavenly goods is prepared.
121.13CSEL 22:578
Dehinc sequitur: fiat pax in uirtute tua, et abundantia in turribus grauibus tuis. pax atque uirtus domus huius conexa sunt sibi. posse enim aliquid nisi ei pace non poterit, quin participatio eius in idipsum est, in idipsum autem esse pax sola consequitur. perfecta uero uirtus eorum tantum est, qui congregantur in idipsum; et idcirco ait: fiat pax in uirtutibus tuis.
Then follows: "Let there be peace in your strength, and abundance in your heavy towers." The peace and strength of this house are joined to each other. For it will not be able to do anything except in peace, since its sharing is in the selfsame, and only peace achieves being in the selfsame. And perfect strength belongs only to those who are gathered into the selfsame; and therefore he says: "Let there be peace in your strengths."
121.14CSEL 22:578–579
Ciuitatem autem necesse est diuerso aedificiorum genere consistere. non enim omnis est murus, porta, turris, neque omnis plateae, porticus, tabernae, neque domus, forum, templa, palatium: sed et differentibus inter se domorum magnificentiis differunt quoque cohabitantium dignitates. in omni uero genere ciuitatis nihil neque firmius neque utilius neque celsius turribus est. solita uero scriptura est grauia pro firmis et inmobilibus nuncupare; sic ubi ait: in populo graui laudabo te. nunc quoque cum de pace uirtutis memorasset, abundantiam beatitudinis perfectae et aeternae ciuitatis huius principibus tamquam firmissimis et grauissimis deputauit dicens: et abundantia in turribus grauibus tuis. superius dixerat: et abundantia diligentibus te; non ergo omnium est abundantia, sed diligentium deum. deinde adiecit: fiat pax in uirtute tua; pax enim ecclesiae et unitas uirtutem nobis firmitatemque praestat secundum illud apostoli: et pax dei, quae exsuperat omnem sensum prudentiae, custodiet corda uestra in Christo Iesu. nunc quoque hanc abundantiam, quam diligentibus spoponderat, propriam esse grauium turrium commemorat; eos graues turres significans esse, quicumque diligerent. per quod intellegendum est abundantiam hanc non promiscuam esse nec totius admodum ciuitatis, sed eorum tantum fidelium et sanctorum uirorum, qui ceterae ciuitatis huius aedificationi tamquam turrium firmitate praestiterint.
A city must consist of different kinds of buildings. For not everything is wall, gate, tower, nor everything streets, porticoes, shops, nor houses, forum, temples, palace: and as the splendors of the houses differ from one another, so too the ranks of those who live together differ. But in every kind of city nothing is firmer, more useful, or higher than towers. Scripture is accustomed to call heavy what is firm and immovable; so where it says: "Among a heavy people I will praise you." Now too, after speaking of the peace of strength, he assigned the abundance of perfect blessedness to the leaders of this eternal city as the firmest and heaviest, saying: "and abundance in your heavy towers." Above he had said, "and abundance to those who love you"; so abundance does not belong to all, but to those who love God. Then he added, "Let there be peace in your strength"; for the peace and unity of the church give us strength and firmness, according to that saying of the apostle: "And the peace of God, which surpasses all understanding, will guard your hearts in Christ Jesus." Now too he recalls that this abundance, which he had promised to those who love, belongs properly to the heavy towers, signifying that whoever love are the heavy towers. By this we must understand that this abundance is not indiscriminate nor of the whole city entirely, but only of those faithful and holy men who have excelled the rest of the building of this city as with the firmness of towers.
121.15CSEL 22:579–580
Sequitur deinde prophetae magnus affectus et in omnem hominem credentem sollicitudo piae admonitionis. ait enim: propter fratres meos et proximos meos loquebar pacem de te: propter domum domini dei mei quaesiui bona tibi. multitudinem in fratribus suis proximisque huius ciuitatis significat; propter quos pacem de ea locutus est, ut audientes se ipsos in aedificium consummandae huius ciuitatis aptarent. sed qui pacem propter fratres et propinquos suos de ea loquitur, ciuitati eidem propter domum dei bona quaerit dicens: propter domum domini dei mei quaesiui bona tibi. ciuitati ergo bona propter domum domini quaesita sunt. discernens enim gloriam domus dei a ciuitatis uniuersitate, quia necesse est ornatum domus regiae aedificationi ciuitatis totius anteferri, quaesiuit bona eidem ciuitati. primum enim fratres et propinqui eius per praedicationem pacis facti sunt domini ciuitas. secundum uero ciuitas ipsa iam ex propinquis eius et fratribus constituta, audiens dignitatem domus dei, domus omnis dei ipsa esse properauit. ac sic ciuitati huic quaesita sunt bona. dum ex ciuitate domini in domum dei proficit secundum illud apostoli: uos estis templum dei, et spiritus domini habitat in uobis. fidelis enim est, qui ait: pater, pro his te rogo, ut omnes unum simus, ego in illis, et tu in me: dominus noster Iesus Christus, qui est benedictus in saecula saeculorum. amen.
Then follows the prophet's great feeling and the concern of loving admonition toward every believing person. For he says: "For the sake of my brothers and my neighbors I spoke peace about you; for the sake of the house of the Lord my God I sought good things for you." By his brothers and neighbors he signifies the multitude of this city, for whose sake he spoke peace about it, so that those hearing might fit themselves into the building of this city that is to be completed. But he who speaks peace about it for the sake of his brothers and kin seeks good things for that same city for the sake of God's house, saying: "For the sake of the house of the Lord my God I sought good things for you." So good things were sought for the city for the sake of the Lord's house. For distinguishing the glory of God's house from the whole of the city, since the adornment of the royal house must be put before the building of the whole city, he sought good things for that same city. For first his brothers and kin were made the Lord's city by the preaching of peace. Second, the city itself, now made up of his kin and brothers, hearing of the dignity of God's house, hastened to be itself wholly God's house. And so good things were sought for this city, while it advances from the city of the Lord into the house of God, according to that saying of the apostle: "You are the temple of God, and the Spirit of the Lord dwells in you." For faithful is he who says: "Father, I ask you for these, that we may all be one, I in them, and you in me": our Lord Jesus Christ, who is blessed for ever and ever. Amen.
Tractates 122
122.1CSEL 22:580–581
Efficitur rebus, quod titulo praescriptum est: gradibus enim cantici tamquam de humilibus ad excelsa conscenditur. namque in primo cantici graduum ad dominum de tribulatione clamatum est. postea leuati oculi in montes sunt, et quaesitum, unde ueniret auxilium. dehinc, quia eleuanti oculos et, unde auxilium ueniat, quaerenti adest doctrinae propheticae institutio, in his, quae sibi sunt dicta, laetatus est. nunc uero quia usque ad id, quod doctrina instituerat, accessum est, de quodam quasi profectus sui gradu cantat propheta: ad te leuaui oculos meos, qui habitas in caelo, incrementis conpetentibus contemplandi dei usus, tamquam post multam caecitatem per modica et dimensa admissae sibi lucis interualla consuetudini totius luminis praeparatus. deus enim, qui primum in tribulatione inuocatus est, quaesitus est a prophetis eosque prophetiae laetificauit auditu. sed nunc iam oculis mentis per fidei fiduciam contemplandus est habitans in caelo.
What is written in the title is brought about in fact: for by the steps of the song one climbs as from low things to high. For in the first Song of Ascents there was a cry to the Lord out of distress. Afterwards the eyes were lifted to the mountains, and it was asked from where help would come. Then, because the instruction of prophetic teaching is present to one who lifts his eyes and asks from where help comes, he rejoiced in the things said to him. But now, because he has come up to what the teaching had prepared, the prophet sings from a certain step, as it were, of his progress: "To you I have lifted my eyes, you who dwell in heaven," having the use of contemplating God by fitting increments, like one prepared, after long blindness, for the habit of the full light by small and measured intervals of light let in to him. For God, who was first called upon in distress, was sought from the prophets and gladdened them by the hearing of prophecy. But now he is to be contemplated with the eyes of the mind through the confidence of faith, dwelling in heaven.
122.2CSEL 22:581
Sed caelum hoc, quod uisibus nostris per materiem sui subiacet, quod tamquam fumus solidatus firmamenti et naturam et nomen accepit, praeteribit et non erit; sedis autem domini manet in aeternum. necesse est uero, ut habitatio habitatore suo digna sit: et corruptibili loco id, quod infinitum et incorruptibile est, concludimus, si deum in caelo hoc habitare credimus. quaeramus ergo, quae habitatio dei sit, nempe eius, qui dixit: pater enim in me, et ego in patre; et rursum: ego et pater unum sumus; et de quo dictum est: deus in Christo erat mundum reconcilians sibi: digno et sufficiente filio, in quo pater per eandem naturae habitet uirtutem; patre autem filium, quem ex se genuit, non separante a se differentia diuinitatis. sed non nunc de inseparabili uirtute patris et filii sermo est. deus enim ex deo genitus non abest per naturam ab eo, ex quo genitus confitendus est: et deus innascibilis unigenitum deum gignens manet in illo, quem genuit proprietate generandi. omnis autem spes in eo nostra est, ut unigenitum deum nouerimus. nam de innascibili deo nemo tam amens est, qui caelum contuens deum esse non sentiat. in hoc ergo caelo deus inhabitat, digno maiestatis suae et diuinitatis habitaculo.
But this heaven, which lies before our sight through its matter, which like solidified smoke received the nature and name of firmament, will pass away and will not be; but the Lord's seat remains for ever. And it is necessary that a dwelling be worthy of its dweller: and we enclose what is infinite and incorruptible in a corruptible place if we believe that God dwells in this heaven. Let us ask, then, what the dwelling of God is: surely he who said, "For the Father is in me, and I in the Father," and again, "I and the Father are one," and of whom it was said, "God was in Christ reconciling the world to himself": the Son being worthy and sufficient, in whom the Father dwells through the power of the same nature, while the Father does not separate from himself the Son whom he begot from himself by any difference of divinity. But we are not now speaking of the inseparable power of the Father and the Son. For God begotten from God is not absent by nature from him from whom he must be confessed to be begotten: and the unbegettable God, begetting the only-begotten God, remains in him whom he begot, by the property of begetting. And all our hope lies in knowing the only-begotten God. For as to the unbegettable God, no one is so mad as not to perceive, when he looks at the heaven, that there is a God. In this heaven, then, God dwells, a dwelling worthy of his majesty and divinity.
122.3CSEL 22:581–582
Sed est et alia conplacita deo et electa habitatio, eorum scilicet, de quibus dictum est: habitabo in his et deambulabo in ipsis, et ipsi mihi erunt in populum, et ego illis in deum; de quibus et apostolus ait: uos estis templum dei, et spiritus dei habitat in uobis. idem quoque apostolus ait: qualis de limo, tales et de limo; et qualis caelestis, tales et caelestes. caelestis ergo est secundus Adam et idcirco caelestis, quia uerbum caro factum est, ex spiritu scilicet et deo homo natus. in hoc ergo uerbo, non inani sono uocis, sed in deo uerbo, neque in dissidenti a se diuersaque substantia, sed in dei uerbo deus tamquam in caelo habitat, in eo scilicet, quod ex se ac suum est. manens; per eum in eis quoque, qui caelestes sunt, habitans, sicut ipse ad patrem ait: ut omnes unum sint, ego in illis, et tu in me. ergo si, qui in Adam limus fuimus, nunc caelestes sumus in Christo et Christus habitator est nostri. per habitantem Christum in nobis etiam ille quoque habitator est nostri, cui est habitans in nobis Christus habitatio.
But there is also another dwelling pleasing to God and chosen, namely that of those of whom it was said, "I will dwell in them and walk among them, and they will be my people, and I will be their God"; of whom the apostle also says, "You are the temple of God, and the Spirit of God dwells in you." The same apostle also says: "As was the man of clay, such are those of clay; and as is the heavenly, such are the heavenly." So the second Adam is heavenly, and heavenly for this reason, that the Word became flesh, that is, a man born from the Spirit and from God. In this Word, then, not an empty sound of the voice, but in God the Word, not in a substance differing and diverse from himself, but in the Word of God, God dwells as in heaven, namely in that which is from him and his own, abiding there; and through him dwelling also in those who are heavenly, as he himself says to the Father: "That all may be one, I in them, and you in me." So if we, who were clay in Adam, are now heavenly in Christ, and Christ is our dweller, then through Christ dwelling in us he too is our dweller, whose dwelling is Christ who dwells in us.
122.4CSEL 22:582
Et quia secundum corporalem intellegentiam ille nobis subest sensus, ut caelum, quod ultra firmamenti huius naturam est, deus inhabitare existimetur, non excludimus publicam illam de sede dei opinionem, ut ei caelum caeli thronus sit, sed et illam dignam deo habitationem in caelesti Adam suo significatam esse credentes. etiam hoc igitur caelum deus habitare noscendus est, per eum quoque inhabitans, quos in eo constituit esse caelestes.
And because, according to bodily understanding, this sense lies within us, that God is thought to dwell in the heaven which is beyond the nature of this firmament, we do not exclude that public opinion about God's seat, that the heaven of heaven is his throne, while believing also that the dwelling worthy of God is signified in his heavenly Adam. So God must be known to dwell in this heaven too, dwelling through him also in those whom he has made heavenly in him.
122.5CSEL 22:582–583
Oportet autem eos, qui ad deum oculos mentis erexerint, non retorquere eos atque deflectere, quia, ut in euangeliis dictum est, nemo retro respiciens et aratrum tenens aptus est regno caelorum. relinquentes enim templa, aras. cupiditates, lasciuias et omne uitiorum profundum conuenit indefesso obtutu inuictoque persistere. si enim gentes errore suo caecae indemutabili pertinacia falsis religionibus detinentur, ita ut reflecti a superstitionibus suis ueri ratione non possint diuersis diis, ut uocant, perseuerante stultitia seruientes et si anima peccantium capta uitiorum inlecebris deuotissime seruit tamquam imperanti sibi corpori, quanto nos magis conuenit deum conditorem caeli et terrae cognoscentes, qui, ut potens fuerit ex terra inanima animare hominem, ita et potens sit hominem, qui animatus occiderit, in aeternitatis consortium excitare, sine deflexu aliquo ac deuia religione uenerari neque quoquam initae fidei pertinaciam deflectere?
But those who have lifted the eyes of the mind to God must not twist them back and turn them aside, because, as was said in the gospels, no one who looks back and holds the plough is fit for the kingdom of heaven. For leaving temples, altars, desires, lusts, and the whole depth of vices, it is fitting to persist with an unwearying and unconquered gaze. For if the nations, blind in their error, are held in false religions with unchangeable obstinacy, so that they cannot be turned back from their superstitions by the reason of truth, serving different gods, as they call them, with persevering folly, and if the soul of sinners, captured by the allurements of vices, serves most devotedly the body as though it ruled over it, how much more fitting is it for us, who know God the founder of heaven and earth, who, as he was able to give life to man from lifeless earth, so is able to raise man, given life and having died, into the fellowship of eternity, to worship him without any swerving or straying religion, and not to turn aside anywhere the steadfastness of the faith we have entered?
122.6CSEL 22:583–584
Et docet propheta hos mentis suae oculos indemutabili ad deum semper esse obtutu dicens: ecce sicut oculi seruorum in manus dominorum suorum et sicut oculi ancillae in manus dominae suae: sic oculi nostri ad dominum deum nostrum, donec misereatur nobis. exempla et conparationem propheta proposuit, ut, sicut in manus dominorum oculi seruorum sunt, ita ad deum fidei suae oculi intenti sint: quia fidelis seruus ad omnem oboedientiam uoluntatis dominicae sollicitus sit indeflexosque oculos semper intendat. sed si de seruis ac dominis corporalibus sermo esset, dictum ita fuerat, oculos seruorum in oculis uel in lingua uel in conspectu esse dominorum; aut nutu enim his iubetur aut ore. sed manus pro operibus frequenter scriptura significat. sunt autem, qui neque hominum neque dei serui sunt, sed serui sunt peccati domino dicente: omnis, qui peccatum facit, seruus est peccati. hi ergo serui harum spiritalium nequitiarum in opera eorum tamquam in manus dominorum suorum oculis mentis suae semper intenti sunt, uitiorum in id desiderio atque admiratione defixi. sunt autem haec diabolica, id est gentilium opera, quae significantur in manibus, uenter, otium, luxus, libido, superbia, auaritia, ambitio: in haec ergo uoluptatum, quarum dominatui subiacent, opera spectantes sensus sui oculis intendunt, quibus dii plures sunt innumerosique domini, prout uniuscuiusque studium et natura auctorem sibi religionis elegerit.
And the prophet teaches that these eyes of his mind are always on God with an unchangeable gaze, saying: "Behold, as the eyes of servants are on the hands of their masters, and as the eyes of a maidservant on the hands of her mistress, so our eyes are on the Lord our God until he has mercy on us." The prophet set forth examples and a comparison, so that, as the eyes of servants are on the hands of their masters, so the eyes of his faith might be intent on God: because a faithful servant is anxious for every obedience to his master's will and always directs unswerving eyes. But if the discourse were about bodily servants and masters, it would have said that the eyes of servants are on the eyes or tongue or face of their masters; for orders are given to them either by a nod or by the mouth. But Scripture often signifies works by hands. And there are those who are servants neither of men nor of God, but are servants of sin, as the Lord says: "Everyone who commits sin is a servant of sin." These servants of the spiritual powers of wickedness, then, are always intent with the eyes of their mind on their works as on the hands of their masters, fixed on them with desire and admiration of vices. And these are the works of the devil, that is, of the gentiles, which are signified by hands: belly, idleness, luxury, lust, pride, greed, ambition. On these works of the pleasures under whose dominion they lie, then, they direct the eyes of their sense, they who have many gods and countless masters, according as each one's pursuit and nature has chosen for himself the author of his religion.
122.7CSEL 22:584–585
Nobis autem unus deus est; non tamen per unionem dei domino nostro Iesu Christo quod deus est abnegantes, sed sequentes legem et prophetas et euangelia et apostolos diuinitatis unitatem in innascibili deo et in unigenito deo secundum proprietatem atque naturam cum fide et ueritate profitemur. nusquam enim genere plurali nec deos neque dominos sermo propheticus nuncupauit, sed unumquemque suo ordine. Genesis namque ait: et pluit sulphur et ignem dominus a domino; et propheta: unxit te deus, deus tuus; et rursum: dixit dominus domino meo; et euangelia: et uerbum erat apud deum et deus erat uerbum; et apostolus: unus deus, ex quo omnia, et unus dominus Iesus, per quem omnia; et rursum: ex quibus Christus est, qui super omnia deus. hoc ergo propter "dominus" dictum est, ut intellegeremus per id, quod unus innascibilis deus est, non adimi unigenito deo posse, quod deus est. deus enim unus uterque est: non quod unus diuisus in duo sit, aut uterque ipse sit, ut nuncupatio sola fecerit patrem et filium, non natura gignendi, sed idcirco deus unus, quia neque duo innascibiles, neque unigeniti duo, sed unus ex uno et ambo unum, non dissimili scilicet aut differente a se substantia diuinitatis in utroque.
But for us there is one God; yet not denying to our Lord Jesus Christ, through the oneness of God, that he is God, but following the law, the prophets, the gospels, and the apostles, we profess with faith and truth the unity of divinity in the unbegettable God and in the only-begotten God, according to property and nature. For nowhere has the prophetic word named gods or lords in the plural, but each in his own order. For Genesis says: "And the Lord rained sulphur and fire from the Lord"; and the prophet: "God, your God, has anointed you"; and again: "The Lord said to my Lord"; and the gospels: "And the Word was with God, and the Word was God"; and the apostle: "One God, from whom are all things, and one Lord Jesus, through whom are all things"; and again: "of whom is Christ, who is God over all." This, then, was said on account of "Lord," so that we might understand that because there is one unbegettable God, it cannot be taken from the only-begotten God that he is God. For each is one God: not because one is divided into two, or each is the same one, so that the naming alone made Father and Son, not the nature of begetting; but therefore one God, because there are neither two unbegettables nor two only-begottens, but one from one and both one, the substance of divinity in each being neither unlike nor different from itself.
122.8CSEL 22:585–586
Sequitur deinde: et sicut oculi ancillae in manus dominae suae. tenuit uero eundem propheta ordinem. ut in conparationis exemplum ancillae quoque oculos in manus dominae esse commemoraret intentos, ut in operum potius efficientias haec desideria seruorum doceret intenta. sed cum plures serui plurium dominorum sint positi in exemplum, quaerendum, cur ancilla una unius commemorata sit dominae. plures enim serui, ut superius diximus, plurium sunt deorum. nunc autem una ancilla et una domina: quia natura una est animae humanae, sicuti et terrenae carnis una natura est. et quia nunc de peccatoribus, qui peccati serui sunt, sermo est, haec ancilla anima carni dominae suae dedita est et per corporalium uitiorum blandimenta subiecta est habetque inferioris sui per inlecebrarum fomenta dominatum, fructus operum eius inspiciens, ergo ut hos seruos et hanc ancillam indemutabilia uitia sua detinent, ut in his quadam religiosa stultitiae suae intentione persistant, ita fidem esse oportet, quae non temporaria ac mobilis sit neque, emissis temptationibus defetigetur, sed usque consummationem misericordiae dei inmobilis et indemutata permaneat.
Then follows: "And as the eyes of a maidservant on the hands of her mistress." The prophet kept the same order, mentioning as an example of comparison that the eyes of a maidservant too are intent on the hands of her mistress, so as to teach that these desires of servants are intent rather on the effects of works. But since many servants of many masters were set as an example, we must ask why one maidservant of one mistress was mentioned. For many servants, as we said above, belong to many gods. But now there is one maidservant and one mistress: because the nature of the human soul is one, just as the nature of the earthly flesh is one. And because the discourse is now about sinners, who are servants of sin, this maidservant, the soul, is given over to the flesh, her mistress, and subjected through the allurements of bodily vices, and has the dominion of her inferior through the kindling of enticements, looking to the fruits of its works. So, as unchangeable vices hold these servants and this maidservant, so that they persist in them with a kind of devout intent of their folly, so faith must be not temporary and changeable, nor wearied when temptations are sent, but remain unmoved and unchanged until the completion of God's mercy.
122.9CSEL 22:586
Et idcirco propheta pertinaciam spei suae usque ad finem accipiendae misericordiae demonstrat dicens: ita oculi nostri ad dominum deum nostrum, donec misereatur nobis. non decidit, non absistit. tardet licet ad temptationem fidei misericordiam suam dominus, quia fides constantem debet praestare fiduciae suae expectationem et desperatio omnis diffidentiae confessio est. sed propheta non incertus est misericordiae dei; nam oculi eius in eum, quoad usque misereatur. intenti sunt, intenti autem adeo, ut intentioni eorum oratio geminata subiecta sit. ait enim posthaec: miserere nobis. domine, miserere nobis. et intentus est et intentus orat: ea scilicet perseuerantia, qua uitiorum serui in dominantibus sibi uitiis demorantur, ille certissima bonorum aeternorum spe et perfectae in se misericordiae fiducia perseuerat.
And therefore the prophet shows the steadfastness of his hope until the end, when mercy is received, saying: "So our eyes are on the Lord our God until he has mercy on us." He does not fall away, he does not give up. Though the Lord delay his mercy to test faith, faith must show a constant expectation of its confidence, and all despair is a confession of distrust. But the prophet is not uncertain of God's mercy; for his eyes are intent on him until he has mercy, and intent so much that a doubled prayer is added to their intent. For he says after this: "Have mercy on us, Lord, have mercy on us." He is both intent and prays intently: with that perseverance with which the servants of vices linger in the vices that rule them, he perseveres in the most certain hope of eternal goods and confidence in God's perfect mercy toward him.
122.10CSEL 22:586–587
Sequitur uero, ut saepenumero cognouimus, hanc fidelium spem grauis iniquorum obtrectatio et molesta malignorum insectatio. iustitiam enim a nobis praedicari inicus odit; pudicitiam si laudamus, inpudicus offenditur; exsecratur in nobis ebrietas ieiunia. at uero cum ad liberalitatem cohortamur. insipientiam nostram auarus accusat. cum Christum deum praedicamus cruciatum, religionem Iudaeus et omnis ex gentibus persecutor exprobrat. cum iudicium dei expectamus, offenduntur saeculi reges et deum arbitrum uitae ab unoquoque actae recusant. cum resurrectionem adnuntiamus, mortua cum uitiis suis infidelium corpora contradicunt. fidem quoque nostram a lege et prophetis et euangeliis et apostolis susceptam omnes haereticorum falsitates coarguunt. caedimur, maledicimur, fugamur, necamur ferro, flammis, profundo; desaeuitur in nostram uerecundiam, desaeuitur in corpora; dolor nobis est ex iniuriis nostris. et quia iniuriae nostrae his, qui eas inferunt, mors est, dolor nobis ex miseratione pereuntium est. ideoque post geminam precationem, qua dixerat: miserere nobis, domine, miserere nobis, adiecit: quia multum repleti sumus aspernatione, quia multum repleta est anima nostra: deo solo aduersum haec opitulari potente, ut ab aspernatione atque contemptu eximat usque ad finem misericordiae in se semper intentum. et idcirco, donec sibi deus misereatur, intentus est, idcirco gemina oratione misericordiam sibi dei precatur, quia multum ipse atque anima sua repleta aspernatione sit, deo, ut diximus, tantum potente in multa aspernatione misereri: neque solum in id potente, sed potente etiam in controuersum omnia retorquere et quandam uicissitudinem praestare patiendi.
But there follows, as we have often learned, the heavy disparagement of the wicked and the troublesome persecution of the malicious against this hope of the faithful. For the unjust man hates that righteousness is preached by us; if we praise chastity, the unchaste is offended; drunkenness curses fasts in us. And when we exhort to generosity, the greedy man accuses our folly. When we preach Christ crucified as God, the Jew and every persecutor from the nations reproach our religion. When we await God's judgment, the kings of the world are offended and refuse God as judge of the life each has led. When we announce the resurrection, the bodies of unbelievers, dead with their vices, contradict. All the falsehoods of the heretics also attack our faith, received from the law, the prophets, the gospels, and the apostles. We are beaten, cursed, put to flight, killed by sword, flames, the deep; there is raging against our modesty, raging against our bodies; there is grief for us from our injuries. And because our injuries are death to those who inflict them, our grief is from pity for those who perish. And therefore after the doubled prayer in which he had said, "Have mercy on us, Lord, have mercy on us," he added: "For we are greatly filled with contempt, for our soul is greatly filled": God alone being able to help against these things, so as to rescue from contempt and scorn one always intent on him until the end of mercy. And therefore he is intent until God has mercy on him, therefore he prays for God's mercy with a doubled prayer, because he and his soul are greatly filled with contempt, God alone, as we said, being able to have mercy in much contempt: and not only able to do that, but able also to turn all things to the contrary and to grant a kind of reversal of suffering.
122.11CSEL 22:587–588
Testis nobis est et pauper in Abrahae sinu quiescens et diues perustus in poena. ille enim in aggestu fimi ante diuitis ianuam fame tabidus, ulcerum sanie defluens sederat, canibus uulnera dissoluta lingentibus. sed haec erat militia corporis, haec aduersus saeculum pugna, interius tamen anima eius per fidem inuulnerabili et ad omne telum, ad uoluptatis uitia inuia: et idcirco ab angelis post carnis dissolutionem beata in Abrahae sinus fertur. ille uero, cui omnis erat uestitus in purpura, cui totius ciuitatis nobilitas graui dominatu subdita famulabatur, cui aeris, terrae, maris copiae in usum conuiuii congregabantur, uni uentri eius officiis elementorum omnium seruientibus, qui huic pauperi ianuam clauserat, micas de mensa excidentes negauerat et tamquam contumeliam suam occursum eius exprobrauerat, excedens hoc, quod male usus fuerat, corpore, inpenetrabili a sanctis chao separatur, omni poenarum ministerio excipitur, dolet, uexatur, amburitur, inrorari se ac refrigerari minimo digito requiescentis in sinu Abrahae pauperis deprecatur. cui Abraham respondet: fili, recordare, quia recepisti bona in uita tua, et Lazarus similiter mala: nunc autem hic consolatur, tu uero cruciaris. fit alterna conuersio: et demutatur laetitia in maerorem et maeror in gaudium. et uideamus, an idipsum, quod euangelium exposuit, nunc quoque propheta significet.
The poor man resting in Abraham's bosom and the rich man burned in punishment are our witnesses. For the former had sat on a heap of dung before the rich man's door, wasting with hunger, flowing with the pus of sores, while dogs licked his open wounds. But this was the warfare of the body, this the fight against the world; yet within, his soul through faith was invulnerable to every dart and impassable to the vices of pleasure: and therefore after the dissolution of the flesh it is carried, blessed, by angels into Abraham's bosom. But the other, whose whole clothing was in purple, whom the nobility of the whole city served, subjected to his heavy rule, for whom the riches of air, earth, and sea were gathered for the use of his banquet, the services of all the elements serving his one belly, who had shut his door to this poor man, had denied him the crumbs falling from the table, and had reproached his presence as an insult to himself, leaving the body he had misused, is separated from the saints by an impassable chasm, is received by every ministry of punishment, grieves, is tormented, is burned, and begs to be moistened and cooled by the little finger of the poor man resting in Abraham's bosom. To him Abraham answers: "Son, remember that you received good things in your life, and Lazarus likewise evil things; but now he is comforted here, and you are tormented." A reversal takes place: joy is changed into sorrow, and sorrow into joy. And let us see whether the prophet now signifies the very thing the gospel set forth.
122.12CSEL 22:588–589
Ait namque: obprobrium abundantibus et aspernatio superbis. post superiores, quas commemorauimus, insectationes regum, gentium, Iudaeorum, haereticorum atque etiam saepe nostrorum facta hic quoque est euangelica conuersio, ut abundantibus sit obprobrium et superbis aspernatio. superbia in contemptum et copia mutatur in inopiam: rursumque et contemptus in superbiam et inopia demutatur in copiam propheta utrumque istud per uerba eadem monstrante. cum dicit: obprobrium abundantibus et aspernatio superbis, siue quod modo obprobrium ferant, qui postea in regno domini abundabunt, et quod nunc in aspernatione sint, qui postea per fidei confidentiam superbient: siue quod iudicii tempore obprobrium et aspernatio in eos, qui nunc in saeculo abundent ac superbiant, reuertatur.
For he says: "Reproach to the abundant and contempt to the proud." After the persecutions we mentioned above, by kings, nations, Jews, heretics, and often even our own, here too the gospel reversal has taken place, so that there is reproach to the abundant and contempt to the proud. Pride is changed into contempt and plenty into want; and again contempt is changed into pride and want into plenty, the prophet showing both by the same words. When he says, "Reproach to the abundant and contempt to the proud," either it means that those now bear reproach who will afterwards abound in the Lord's kingdom, and that those are now in contempt who will afterwards be proud through the confidence of faith; or that at the time of judgment reproach and contempt will turn back upon those who now abound and are proud in the world.
122.13CSEL 22:589
Paulus in infirmitatibus et in angustiis suis gloriatur. iudicem quoque eligi potentium ex contemptibilibus ecclesiae praecipit. mutuam sibi legem ille et Petrus instituunt, ut meminissent egenorum eorumque curam facerent sollicite. minimorum angeli deum cotidie uident; humilis exaltabitur; et optimum sacrificium deo est cor contribulatum. non ergo abiciamus humilem, non contemnamus pauperem, non transeamus indigentem. ne profundo ab his chao separemur, ne refrigerare nos minimo digito suo dedignentur, quia obprobrium abundantibus et aspernatio superbis sit. demutabilis est ista conuersio, et digna in bonos et malos uicissitudo, quam in euangeliis ostendit dicens: beati lugentes, quoniam ipsi consolabuntur, et rursum: uae uobis, qui ridetis, quoniam flebitis, dominus noster Iesus Christus, qui est benedictus in saecula saeculorum. amen.
Paul glories in his weaknesses and distresses. He also commands that a judge of the powerful be chosen from the despised of the church. He and Peter set a mutual law for themselves, to remember the poor and take care of them diligently. The angels of the least see God daily; the humble will be exalted; and the best sacrifice to God is a contrite heart. So let us not cast off the humble, let us not despise the poor, let us not pass by the needy, lest we be separated from them by a deep chasm, lest they disdain to cool us with their little finger, because there is reproach to the abundant and contempt to the proud. This reversal is a change and a fitting exchange for good and bad, which he shows in the gospels, saying, "Blessed are those who mourn, for they will be comforted," and again, "Woe to you who laugh, for you will weep," our Lord Jesus Christ, who is blessed for ever and ever. Amen.
Tractates 123
123.1CSEL 22:589–590
Attulit magnum nobis conpendium psalmus anterior; ab eo enim in hunc scanditur. oculi namque mentis nostrae intenti ad deum fuerunt usque ad misericordiae finem multis undique aspernationibus et obprobriis circumstantibus. post quae misericordiam consecutos et de obprobrio in abundantia et de aspernatione in superbia conlocatos quid agere ac loqui nos oporteat, propheta demonstrat dicens: nisi quod dominus erat in nobis, dicat nunc Israhel; nisi quod dominus erat in nobis, cum surgerent homines in nos, forte uiuos degluttissent nos. et quidem sermo ipse talis est, ut intellegatur prophetae esse instruentis, quid dici a ceteris oporteat. primum enim res ipsa dicta est; dehinc qualiter sit dicenda monstratur. et hic fuit ordo, ut, quid agendum, dehinc, quatenus agendum esset, ostenderetur. nisi quod dominus erat in nobis, dicat nunc Israhel. dictum ergo est, quid dici ab Israhel oporteret. de Israhel frequenter admonuimus eum existimandum, qui deum mentis oculis contemplatus sit. nunc ergo secundum prophetiam cognito, quid dicere debeat, Israhel loquetur: nisi quod dominus erat in nobis, cum insurgerent homines in nos, forte uiuos degluttissent nos. hoc ergo Israhel exemplum accipiens a propheta dicet, quia audiuit: nisi quod dominus erat in nobis, dicat nunc Israhel.
The previous psalm has given us a great shortcut; for from it one climbs into this one. For the eyes of our mind were intent on God until the end of mercy, with many contempts and reproaches surrounding us on every side. After which, the prophet shows what we, having obtained mercy and been placed from reproach into abundance and from contempt into pride, ought to do and say, saying: "Had not the Lord been among us, let Israel now say; had not the Lord been among us when men rose up against us, perhaps they would have swallowed us alive." And indeed the wording itself is such that it is understood to be the prophet's, instructing what others should say. For first the thing itself is said; then it is shown how it is to be said. And this was the order, that what was to be done should be shown, and then how far it was to be done. "Had not the Lord been among us, let Israel now say." So it was said what Israel ought to say. Of Israel we have often noted that he is to be thought one who has contemplated God with the eyes of the mind. So now, having learned according to the prophecy what he should say, Israel will speak: "Had not the Lord been among us when men rose up against us, perhaps they would have swallowed us alive." This, then, Israel will say, taking the example from the prophet, because he heard: "Had not the Lord been among us, let Israel now say."
123.2CSEL 22:590–591
Non est autem leue mandatum illud, quod necesse fuit praeeunte quodam prophetae praeconio demonstrari. in his namque rebus, quae difficilia sunt, desideratur exemplum. omnis enim natura hominum insolens ad res secundas est et inbecillitatis suae inmemor inconsulte in prosperis laetans est quod ab homine doctrina dei erudito abesse oportet. quis enim relictus est nobis gloriandi locus recordantibus omnia ex deo esse? si nos nobis uitam inseruimus, debeamus et nobis corporum speciem: si ipsi pluuias aestusque moderamur, ex nostro esse prouentus fructuum gloriemur: si non in omnibus opus est dei misericordia, et omnia nobis, tamquam ex nostro sint, uindicemus. numquid fortis fortem se gloriabitur, quem corporis aegritudo efficiet infirmum? numquid diues in opibus gloriabitur, cui haec omnia forte fur, praedo, tyrannus abripiet? numquid nobilitas gloriabitur, effecta nonnumquam infirma et miserabilis seruitus? numquid sapiens gloriabitur, incertus, quid in momenta sibi accidat? sed si quid horum sine molestiae alicuius interpellatione utimur, laetamur, efferimur. et si ex aliqua tristitia in gaudium reuertamur, huius ipsius uix adepti gaudii incapaces ultra sensum humanae inbecillitatis extollimur, inmemores dicti huius: non glorietur sapiens in sapientia sua, neque fortis in fortitudine sua, neque diues in diuitiis suis, sed in eo glorietur, qui gloriatur, intellegere se et cognoscere, quia ego sum dominus. ergo nos de consuetudinis nostrae uitio insolentes quodam praescripto confessionis propheta formauit, et ad honorem deo reddendum et in eo gloriandum exemplo admonitionis edocuit dicens: nisi quod dominus erat in nobis, dicat nunc Israhel.
That command is not a light one, which had to be shown by a kind of herald's announcement of the prophet going before. For in difficult matters an example is desired. For all human nature is insolent toward prosperity and, forgetful of its weakness, rejoices thoughtlessly in good fortune; which ought to be absent from a man trained in God's teaching. For what room for boasting is left to us who remember that all things are from God? If we have implanted life in ourselves, let us also owe to ourselves the form of our bodies; if we ourselves govern the rains and heats, let us boast that the yield of crops is from us; if God's mercy is not needed in all things, let us also claim all things for ourselves as if they were from us. Will the strong man boast of his strength, whom sickness of body will make weak? Will the rich man boast in his wealth, from whom perhaps a thief, a robber, a tyrant will snatch all this? Will nobility boast, made sometimes a weak and pitiable slavery? Will the wise man boast, uncertain what may befall him in a moment? But if we enjoy any of these without the interruption of some trouble, we rejoice, we are carried away. And if we return from some sadness to joy, unable to bear this very joy barely gained, we are lifted beyond the sense of human weakness, forgetful of this saying: "Let not the wise man boast in his wisdom, nor the strong man in his strength, nor the rich man in his riches, but let him who boasts boast in this, that he understands and knows that I am the Lord." So the prophet formed us, insolent from the vice of our habit, by a kind of prescribed confession, and taught us by the example of his admonition to give honor to God and to boast in him, saying: "Had not the Lord been among us, let Israel now say."
123.3CSEL 22:591–592
Auditis igitur a propheta, quae dicere nos oportet, dicamus et nos: nisi quod dominus erat in nobis, cum insurgerent homines in nos, forsitan uiuos degluttissent nos. perpessi namque hominum insectationes. regum impias constitutiones, consiliatorum inlecebrosas adhortationes cum in fide maneamus, cum in timore dei resideamus, cum in spe bonorum aeternorum inmoremur adiuti dei misericordia, scientes fidelem, qui dixit: ecce ego uobiscum sum omnibus diebus usque ad consummationem saeculi, ad hunc habitantem in nobis gaudia nostra referamus, huic, si quid in nobis est. debeamus; a Paulo beato edocti nihil nostrum existimandum dicente: quid habes, quod non accepisti? si autem accepisti, quid gloriaris, quasi non acceperis? a sancto uero Iacob patriarcha modestiam referendae gratiae cognoscentes, cum dicit: deus, qui enutriuit me iuuentute mea, et angelus eruens me ex omnibus malis.
Having heard from the prophet, then, what we ought to say, let us too say: "Had not the Lord been among us when men rose up against us, perhaps they would have swallowed us alive." For having endured the persecutions of men, the impious decrees of kings, the enticing exhortations of counselors, since we remain in faith, since we abide in the fear of God, since we stay in the hope of eternal goods, helped by God's mercy, knowing that he is faithful who said, "Behold, I am with you all days until the consummation of the age," let us refer our joys to him who dwells in us, let us owe to him whatever is in us; taught by blessed Paul to think nothing our own, when he says: "What do you have that you did not receive? And if you received it, why do you boast as if you had not received it?"; learning the modesty of giving thanks from the holy patriarch Jacob, when he says: "God, who has fed me from my youth, and the angel who rescued me from all evils."
123.4CSEL 22:592–593
Non est autem in usu hominum, ut uiuos alios uorent. neque usque ad carnes gluttiendas odia procedunt. sed neque nunc de eruto a morte corpore gaudium est, sed de anima a peccato conseruata atque a peccatorum consortio liberata. idcirco ita ait: forsitan uiuos degluttiendos fuisse, scilicet in corpore adhuc positos a morte peruasos atque a peccato comestos. haec enim uiuorum mors est, uiuere luxui, somno, sacrilegiis, adulteriis, caedibus. deo ergo gratiae agendae sunt manenti in nobis, quod per fidem eius doctrinamque uiuentes non degluttimur ab istis. fit ergo hic in gratulatione ordo, qui est et in iniquitatibus. nam quia ab insurgentibus primum aduersus nos degluttiti non erimus, ne postea quidem irascentibus eorum animis ab aqua, protegente domino, absorbebimur.
But it is not the custom of men to devour others alive, nor does hatred go so far as to swallow flesh. Nor is the joy now about a body rescued from death, but about a soul preserved from sin and freed from the fellowship of sinners. Therefore he says that we would perhaps have been swallowed alive, that is, while still placed in the body, overrun by death and eaten by sin. For this is the death of the living: to live for luxury, sleep, sacrileges, adulteries, murders. So thanks must be given to God abiding in us, that, living by his faith and teaching, we are not swallowed by these. So the order here in thanksgiving is the same as in the iniquities. For because we shall not be swallowed by those who first rise against us, neither afterwards, when their minds are angry, shall we be engulfed by the water, the Lord protecting us.
123.5CSEL 22:593–594
Ait enim: in eo cum irasceretur animus eorum aduersus nos, forsitan aqua absorbuisset nos. sed quid hoc est? animi hominum irascuntur, et aqua nos absorbet? numquid ad motum mentium incitatarum ultrices aquae adsistunt aut animales sunt, ut absorbeant? enecari in aqua, qui demersi erunt, possunt; absorbere autem id, quod inanimale est, non potest. quaerendum ergo nobis est, quid hic intellegi oporteat. et meminisse eorum locorum necessarium est, in quibus aquae facta sit mentio. et quidem in exordio libri Genesis ita scriptum est: et tenebrae erant super abyssum. et spiritus dei superferebatur super aquas; et rursum: dixit deus: fiat firmamentum in medio aquae et sit diuidens inter aquam, quae est sub firmamento, et inter aquam, quae est super firmamentum; et rursum: et aqua, quae super caelos est, laudet dominum; et rursum: uiderunt te aquae, deus, uiderunt te aquae et timuerunt. ergo quia lex spiritalis est et fides historiae non periclitatur, si rebus effectis inesse conexam sibi extrinsecus significantiam existimemus, uidemus et aquas esse, super quas sit spiritus dei, et aquas esse, quae super caelos sint, esse et quae in terris sint, et aquas esse, quae laudent, et aquas esse, quae timeant. per quod recte significari aquas populos intellegimus, in quibus sint spiritales. sint et tenebrosae; sint caelestes, sint et terrestres; sint gloriosum aduentum domini laudaturae, sint et timentes. hae ergo sunt trepidae, terrenae, tenebrosae absorbere nos uolentes animis in iram concitatis et toto diabolici furoris impetu commotis, tamquam maxime hiemis tempestate torrentibus et per praeceps ruentibus.
For he says: "When their anger was kindled against us, perhaps the water would have engulfed us." But what is this? The minds of men are angry, and the water engulfs us? Do avenging waters stand ready at the movement of excited minds, or are they living things, to engulf? Those who are submerged can be drowned in water; but what is lifeless cannot engulf. So we must ask what is to be understood here. And it is necessary to remember those places in which mention of water is made. And indeed at the beginning of the book of Genesis it is written thus: "And darkness was over the abyss, and the Spirit of God was borne over the waters"; and again: "God said: Let there be a firmament in the midst of the water, and let it divide between the water that is under the firmament and the water that is above the firmament"; and again: "And let the water that is above the heavens praise the Lord"; and again: "The waters saw you, O God, the waters saw you and were afraid." So since the law is spiritual and the faith of history is not endangered if we think that a meaning connected from outside is present in things done, we see that there are waters over which is the Spirit of God, and waters above the heavens, and waters on the earth, and waters that praise, and waters that fear. By which we rightly understand that peoples are signified by the waters, among whom some are spiritual, some dark; some heavenly, some earthly; some who will praise the glorious coming of the Lord, some who fear. These, then, are the trembling, earthly, dark waters, wishing to engulf us with minds roused to anger and moved by the whole onrush of diabolical fury, like torrents in the storm of deepest winter rushing headlong.
123.6CSEL 22:594
Atque ita in ordine confessionis nostrae ad dominum adiecit propheta: torrentem pertransiit anima nostra. forsitan pertransisset anima nostra aquam inmensam. ecce diaboli et suorum inruentes impetus et ex turbidis motibus concitatos furentesque procursus et tempestatis temporariae torrentes; sed haec intolerabilis aqua animam non transit, in qua deus habitat. intolerabilis autem est deo uacuis: his autem, in quibus deus est, torrens repentinus, post paululum uero ad transeundi facultatem aridus et exhaustus.
And so in the order of our confession to the Lord the prophet added: "Our soul has passed through the torrent; perhaps our soul would have passed through an immense water." Behold the rushing assaults of the devil and his own, their onslaughts roused and raging from turbulent movements, and the torrents of a temporary storm; but this unbearable water does not pass over the soul in which God dwells. It is unbearable to those empty of God; but to those in whom God is, it is a sudden torrent, and after a little dry and exhausted, so that it can be crossed.
123.7CSEL 22:594–595
Atque ut nullus hic de aquis sensus esset, consequitur: benedictus dominus, qui non dedit nos in capturam dentibus eorum. et qui sunt horum torrentium dentes? sunt plane ad laniandum adprehendendumque uehementes, ira, cupiditas, lasciuia, odium, gula, auaritia. hi sunt dentes mali et tenaces. per haec enim in nos captos laniatosque dominantur. dum uitiorum suorum aut ministros aut consortes esse nos faciunt: quibus non carnes nostrae, sed anima, nisi deus in nobis esset. ab his manderetur.
And so that no sense about waters should be here, there follows: "Blessed be the Lord, who has not given us as prey to their teeth." And what are the teeth of these torrents? They are surely violent for tearing and seizing: anger, desire, lust, hatred, gluttony, greed. These are evil and tenacious teeth. For through these they rule over us, captured and torn, while they make us either ministers or partners of their vices: by which not our flesh but our soul would be devoured, if God were not in us.
123.8CSEL 22:595
Ait enim: anima nostra sicut passer erepta est de laqueo uenatorum. laqueos, qui uenantur, occulte et fallentes praetendunt, aut absconsos uallibus aut herbis contectos aut cibis oblitteratos aut nubibus concolores. et haec quidem ad bestias atque aues ceteras: nobis uero aduersus animam haec parantur. est enim nobis laqueus in otio, pecunia, ambitione, lasciuia. haec praetenduntur, haec blandiuntur, haec fallunt; sed ab his omnibus uoluntas nostra referenda est. omnibus enim hi laquei praetensi sunt, sicut scriptum est: non enim iniuste praetenduntur retia auibus. perfecta enim gloria est ab his laqueis, qui praetensi sunt, euolare.
For he says: "Our soul has been rescued like a sparrow from the snare of the fowlers." Those who hunt set out snares secretly and deceitfully, either hidden in valleys or covered with grass or concealed with food or colored like the clouds. And these indeed are against beasts and other birds; but against us they are prepared against the soul. For there is a snare for us in leisure, money, ambition, lust. These are set out, these flatter, these deceive; but our will must be drawn back from all these. For these snares are set out for all, as it is written: "For not unjustly are nets set out for birds." For it is perfect glory to fly away from these snares that have been set out.
123.9CSEL 22:595–596
Denique psalmus ita dicit: anima nostra sicut passer erepta est de laqueo uenatorum: non utique uenantium, sed eorum, quibus in uenatione tensi sunt laquei. non enim cum quis in laqueum inciderit, tunc fiet peccator, sed, cum omnibus tendantur, ille tamen, qui iam sit peccator, in laqueo est; sicut scriptum est: oculus meretricis laqueus peccatoris. ergo peccatis omnibus abstinendum est, ne incidamus in laqueum. spiritales enim sumus et euolamus ut passeres. passer auis domestica et aedificiorum incola, non momentanea, non temporaria, sed sine demutatione ulla aut temporis obseruatione consistens. nos ergo sine uicissitudine temporum ecclesiam incolentes abstineamus a peccatis, ut a laqueis euolemus. laqueus enim per deum in nos habitantem conteritur: quia ita sequitur: laqueus contritus est, et nos liberati sumus. adiutorium nostrum in nomine domini, qui fecit caelum et terram. hoc adiutorio laqueus conteritur, hoc adiutorio liberamur in nomine domini, qui fecit caelum et terram: quod est scilicet super omne nomen, in quo omne genu flectet caelestium et terrestrium et infernorum et omnis lingua confitebitur, quia dominus Iesus in gloria est dei patris, qui est benedictus in saecula saeculorum. amen.
Then the psalm says thus: "Our soul has been rescued like a sparrow from the snare of the fowlers": certainly not of those who hunt, but of those for whose hunting the snares have been set. For it is not when one falls into the snare that he becomes a sinner, but, while they are set for all, the one who is already a sinner is in the snare; as it is written: "The eye of a harlot is the snare of the sinner." So we must abstain from all sins, lest we fall into the snare. For we are spiritual and fly away like sparrows. The sparrow is a domestic bird and a dweller in buildings, not passing nor seasonal, but staying without any change or regard to season. So let us, dwelling in the church without change of seasons, abstain from sins, so that we may fly away from the snares. For the snare is broken through God who dwells in us; because it follows thus: "The snare is broken, and we are set free. Our help is in the name of the Lord, who made heaven and earth." By this help the snare is broken, by this help we are set free in the name of the Lord, who made heaven and earth: which is namely the name above every name, at which every knee will bend, of things in heaven, on earth, and under the earth, and every tongue will confess that the Lord Jesus is in the glory of God the Father, who is blessed for ever and ever. Amen.
Tractates 124
124.1CSEL 22:596–597
Faciunt nobis plerique obscuritatem, uolentes scripturas propheticas solo aurium iudicio aestimare et non aliud in his intellegere, quam quod sub singulis rerum quarumque uocabulis audiatur. quod cum uolunt, neque nobis, quod intellegamus, relinquent, neque prophetas non dico caelestia, sed ne terrena quidem rationabiliter dixisse constituent. quid enim aut a nobis congrue tractabitur aut ab illis recte dictum existimabitur, cum aquas laudantes, uidentes, timentes et plaudentes manibus audiemus, nisi ex auctoritatibus scripturarum earundem sub aquarum nomine aliud significari, quod alterius sit generis, monstramus? id scilicet, quod sit uiuum ac sentiens et ad rei uniuscuiusque iudicium suo motu sensuque se permouens: quod esse homo intellegetur laudans, uidens, timens, plaudens, iudicans. haec enim humanae affectionis genera in aquis esse sermo propheticus edidit; quorum quia in aquas natura non conuenit, nec propheta de aquis dixerit nec nos de aquis dictum intellegimus. hoc propter ea, quae in praesenti psalmo sunt, retractari conuenit, quae talia sunt.
Many make obscurity for us, wishing to judge the prophetic Scriptures by the judgment of the ears alone and to understand nothing in them other than what is heard under the individual words for each thing. When they wish this, they will leave us nothing to understand, nor will they establish that the prophets spoke reasonably, I do not say heavenly things, but not even earthly ones. For what will be treated fittingly by us, or be thought rightly said by them, when we hear of waters praising, seeing, fearing, and clapping their hands, unless we show from the authorities of the same Scriptures that under the name of waters something else of another kind is signified? Namely what is living and sensing and moves itself by its own motion and sense to judge each thing: which will be understood to be man, praising, seeing, fearing, clapping, judging. For the prophetic word has set out that these kinds of human feeling are in waters; and since their nature does not fit waters, neither did the prophet speak of waters nor do we understand it to be said of waters. This should be gone over again because of what is in the present psalm, which is as follows.
124.2CSEL 22:597–598
Qui confidunt in domino, sicut mons Sion; non commouebitur in aeternum, qui habitat in Hierusalem. montes in circuitu eius. nomen montis Sion et habitatio Hierusalem et montes circum eam si nullam interioris intellegentiae habent causam, inanis est psalmus et mendax propheta, in quo spiritus sanctus locutus esse credatur. est enim mons Sion ciuitati Hierusalem imminens; est ea ciuitas, circa quam extrinsecus plures sint montes. qui ergo confidit in domino, quem profectum habebit, ut sit sicuti mons Sion? ex rationabili homine fieri saxum, arborem, caespitem et de natura animali in naturam inanimalem referri? iam uero quomodo fidelis hic sermo sit, non commouendum eum in aeternum, qui habitet in Hierusalem? numquid Hierusalem ipsa sanctificationem habitantibus adferebat, ut habitatio eius firmitas esset aeterna, cum illinc sacrilega caedes prophetarum, iudicium mortis in dominum, fuga apostolorum, crucis scandalum sit? habitantes autem in ea quotiens captiui, quotiens perempti? ad ultimum urbs eadem funditus diruta est et qui uastationi eius residui erant, capti atque dispersi sunt, propheta hoc impietati eius excidium antea ita nuntiante: terra uestra deserta, ciuitates uestrae igni concrematae, regionem uestram in conspectu uestro exteri comedent, et desolata et subuersa a populis extraneis derelinquetur filia Sion, ut tabernaculum in uinea et sicut casa custodiaria in cucumerario. iam ergo inanis est sermo, inanis prophetia, quae et addiderit: montes in circuitu eius, et dominus in circuitu populi sui ex hoc nunc et usque in saeculum. Hierusalem euersa est, populi eius extincti sunt, reliquiae eius dissipatae sunt; hodie in ea non habitatur; non sacerdos, non propheta, non princeps; sed ipsa obtrita, deserta, sine fructu est. et quomodo habitatio eius non commouebitur in aeternum? et dominus in circuitu populi eius ex hoc nunc et usque in saeculum? ergo non potest de ea prophetatum uideri, a qua prophetiae ueritas dissidebit. sequens igitur est, ut quaeramus, in quos dictorum ratio conueniat.
"Those who trust in the Lord are like Mount Zion; he who dwells in Jerusalem will not be moved for ever. Mountains are round about it." If the name of Mount Zion, the dwelling of Jerusalem, and the mountains around it have no ground of inner understanding, the psalm is empty and the prophet, in whom the Holy Spirit is believed to have spoken, a liar. For Mount Zion overhangs the city of Jerusalem; it is the city around which there are many mountains outside. What progress, then, will one who trusts in the Lord have, to be like Mount Zion? To become, from a rational man, a rock, a tree, a sod, and be brought from a living nature into a lifeless one? And how is this saying faithful, that he who dwells in Jerusalem will not be moved for ever? Did Jerusalem itself bring sanctification to its inhabitants, so that dwelling there was eternal firmness, since from there came the sacrilegious slaughter of the prophets, the sentence of death against the Lord, the flight of the apostles, the scandal of the cross? And how often were its inhabitants captured, how often killed? Finally the same city was utterly destroyed, and those left from its devastation were taken and scattered, the prophet announcing this destruction beforehand for its impiety thus: "Your land is deserted, your cities burned with fire, strangers devour your country before your eyes, and the daughter of Zion will be left desolate and overthrown by foreign peoples, like a booth in a vineyard and like a watchman's hut in a cucumber field." So the saying is empty, the prophecy empty, which also added: "Mountains are round about it, and the Lord is round about his people from this time forth and for ever." Jerusalem is overthrown, its people are extinct, its remnants are scattered; today it is not inhabited; no priest, no prophet, no prince; but it is crushed, deserted, without fruit. And how will its dwelling not be moved for ever? And how is the Lord round about its people from this time forth and for ever? So it cannot seem to be prophesied of the city from which the truth of the prophecy will disagree. It follows, then, that we must ask to whom the meaning of the words applies.
124.3CSEL 22:598–599
Et quidem primum animaduertendum est, non alterius montis quam Sion factam mentionem. legimus enim esse montem domini et Choreb, usque ad quem primum Moyses, cum multa obisset, accessit: esse et montem dei Sina, in quo populi lex scripta sit. est et Sion mons superimminens Hierusalem. sed quia in hunc montem fructus prophetiae nullus est, uidendum est. quid in monte intellegi oporteat. et habemus optimum intellegentiae ducem Esaiam. nam cum superius montem domini excelsum significasset, ad quem gentes uenturae essent, ait: propter hoc sic dicit dominus: ecce mitto in fundamenta Sion lapidem praeclarum, electum. angularem, pretiosum in fundamenta eius; et qui credit in eum, non confundetur. et non ambiguum est apostolum fundamentum Christum significasse, per quod beata illa dominici corporis ecclesia, cuius fundamentum est Christus, significari uidetur in monte. quam idem apostolus et Hierusalem nuncupat dicens: quae nunc est Hierusalem, seruit cum filiis suis; ea autem, quae sursum est, Hierusalem libera est, quae est mater nostra. habemus ergo montem Sion domini, habemus et ciuitatem dei Hierusalem: et nominis Sion interpretatio est speculatio. sic ergo montem dominum in Danielo accipimus, ex monte in lapidem et rursum ex lapide in montem; exinaniuit enim se in forma dei constitutus et formam serui accepit et per passionem suam mundo cum superstitionibus suis erroribusque prostrato in gloria dei patris est et deus super omnia est; propter infirmitatem carnis ex monte in lapidem exinanitus. propter gloriam passionis ex lapide rursum effectus in montem: mons supereminens et excelsus, in quo ipsi nosmetipsos per adsumptionem carnis nostrae corporisque speculamur.
And first we must notice that mention is made of no other mountain than Zion. For we read that there is the mountain of the Lord, Horeb, to which Moses first came after he had gone through many things; and the mountain of God, Sinai, on which the law of the people was written. There is also Zion, the mountain overhanging Jerusalem. But because there is no fruit of prophecy in this mountain, we must see what is to be understood by the mountain. And we have Isaiah as the best guide of understanding. For after he had above signified the lofty mountain of the Lord, to which the nations would come, he says: "Therefore thus says the Lord: Behold, I lay in the foundations of Zion a stone, splendid, chosen, a cornerstone, precious, in its foundations; and whoever believes in him will not be put to shame." And there is no doubt that the apostle signified Christ as the foundation, by which that blessed church of the Lord's body, whose foundation is Christ, seems to be signified by the mountain. The same apostle also calls it Jerusalem, saying: "The Jerusalem that now is, is in slavery with her children; but the Jerusalem that is above is free, which is our mother." So we have the Lord's Mount Zion, and we have the city of God, Jerusalem; and the interpretation of the name Zion is "watchtower." So we understand the Lord as the mountain in Daniel, from mountain to stone and again from stone to mountain; for being in the form of God he emptied himself and took the form of a servant, and through his passion, having laid the world low with its superstitions and errors, he is in the glory of God the Father and is God over all; emptied from mountain into stone because of the weakness of the flesh, made again from stone into mountain because of the glory of the passion: a mountain eminent and lofty, in which, through his taking of our flesh and body, we behold ourselves.
124.4CSEL 22:599–600
In eo enim sumus resurrectionem nostram in resurrectione nostri in eo corporis contemplantes: speculatio est enim Sion. loquatur interpretationem hanc hebraica lingua, qua dictum est: mons Sion mons speculationis est. loquatur et Paulus et dicat: nostra autem conuersatio in caelis est, unde et saluatorem nostrum expectamus, qui transformabit corpus humilitatis nostrae conformatum corpori gloriae suae; dicat et rursum: et cum essemus mortui peccatis, uiuificauit nos simul cum Christo et coexcitauit et conlocauit in caelestibus. dicat et euangelium: quotquot receperunt eum, dedit his potestatem filios dei fieri. dicat ergo nunc et propheta: qui confidunt in domino, sicut mons Sion; non commouebitur in aeternum, qui habitat in Hierusalem. sequamur apostolum, sequamur euangelium, sequamur prophetam. confidamus in domino. ut conformes corporis gloriae dei simus. habitemus nunc ecclesiam, caelestem Hierusalem, ut non moueamur in aeternum. in hac enim habitantes habitabimus et in illa; quia haec illius forma est; ex parte enim cognoscimus et ex parte prophetamus. et nunc uidemus per speculum in aenigmate, tunc autem facie ad faciem. sed et haec caelestis et illa caelestis; et haec Hierusalem et illa Hierusalem; et illa quidem ecclesia angelorum multitudinis frequentium: sed est ecclesia primitiuorum, est et ecclesia spirituum in domino fundatorum. fundandi ergo sumus in spiritu et in hac habitantibus standum est, non discurrendum, sicut Moysi dictum est: tu autem hic mecum sta. non simus procursibus uagi neque uiis incerti neque inanis doctrinae uento euolantes. in aeternum enim manendum est, si sine commotione steterimus.
For in him we are, contemplating our resurrection in the resurrection of our body in him: for Zion is a watchtower. Let the Hebrew language, in which it was said, speak this interpretation: Mount Zion is the mount of watching. Let Paul too speak and say: "But our citizenship is in heaven, from which we also await our Savior, who will transform the body of our humiliation, conformed to the body of his glory"; and let him say again: "And when we were dead in sins, he made us alive together with Christ and raised us up with him and seated us in the heavenly places." Let the gospel too say: "As many as received him, to them he gave power to become sons of God." Let the prophet too now say: "Those who trust in the Lord are like Mount Zion; he who dwells in Jerusalem will not be moved for ever." Let us follow the apostle, let us follow the gospel, let us follow the prophet. Let us trust in the Lord, so that we may be conformed to the glory of God's body. Let us dwell now in the church, the heavenly Jerusalem, so that we may not be moved for ever. For dwelling in this we shall dwell also in that; because this is the form of that; for we know in part and prophesy in part, and now we see through a mirror in a riddle, but then face to face. But both this is heavenly and that is heavenly; both this is Jerusalem and that is Jerusalem; and that indeed is the church of a multitude of thronging angels: but there is the church of the firstborn, and there is the church of spirits founded in the Lord. So we must be founded in the Spirit, and those who dwell in this must stand, not run about, as it was said to Moses: "But you, stand here with me." Let us not wander in rushing about, nor be uncertain in our ways, nor fly off with the wind of empty teaching. For we must remain for ever, if we stand without being moved.
124.5CSEL 22:600–601
Sed neque desunt stare uolentibus sanctorum custodiae, neque angelorum munitiones. dicitur enim: montes in circuitu eius, et dominus in circuitu populi sui ex hoc et usque in saeculum. hos enim secundum superiora exempla montes esse existimabimus humilitatem terrae excedentes, firmos et excelsos et inmobiles. cum enim et montem significari ecclesiam, id est dominum in corpore legimus, et inueniamus montes dei exultare atque laetari — scriptum enim est: montes exultauerunt ut arietes --, quomodo possumus montes non eos significatos esse intellegere, qui super terrenam naturam gloriosi iam in dei rebus exultant?
But those who wish to stand do not lack the guards of the saints nor the defenses of angels. For it is said: "Mountains are round about it, and the Lord is round about his people from this time forth and for ever." For according to the previous examples we shall think these mountains to be those who rise above the lowliness of the earth, firm, lofty, and immovable. For since we read that the mountain signifies the church, that is, the Lord in the body, and we find that the mountains of God exult and rejoice, for it is written, "The mountains skipped like rams," how can we not understand that those are signified as mountains who, glorious above earthly nature, already exult in the things of God?
124.6CSEL 22:601–602
Ac ne leue praesidium in apostolis, uel patriarchis ac prophetis, uel potius in angelis, qui ecclesiam quadam custodia circumsaepiunt, crederemus, adiectum est: et dominus in circuitu populi sui ex hoc nunc et usque in saeculum. sed forte apostolorum uel angelorum custodia sufficiens existimetur. uerum id quidem est; sed et Moysen audiamus. namque cum ei dominus dixisset: ecce angelus meus antecedet te. et ille respondit: nisi tu mecum ambules, ne me expellas hinc. bonum quidem praesidium angeli, sed melius domini. multis anima nostra laqueis adpetitur, multis aduersus nos armis dimicatur. non terra, non maria, non aer a fidei nostrae periculo uacant. rapiunt oculos nostros rarae incogniti maris gemmae, occupat animum terrae aurum, notis nos mortis nostrae inlecebris spiritales nequitiae et aeris huius uirtutes circumuolant, per uitae praesentis molestias, per alienae uoluntatis mores atque lasciuiam insidiantes, ut irascamur, ut oderimus, ut amemus: undique expectamur et adpetimur. sciens ergo dominus non aduersus carnem et sanguinem nobis pugnam esse, sed aduersum mundi huius potentes et nequitias spiritales, ait euangelia consummans: ecce ego uobiscum sum omnibus diebus usque in consummationem saeculi. adest enim; et cum fideliter inuocatur, per naturam suam praesens est. spiritus namque est omnia penetrans et continens. non enim secundum nos corporalis est, ut, cum alicubi adsit, absit aliunde: sed uirtute praesenti et se, quacumque est aliquid, porrigenti, cum replente omnia eius spiritu in omnibus sit, tamen ei, qui in eum credat, adsistit. nam et tribus uel duobus in nomine suo congregatis erit praesens, et in circuitu omnis populi sui est ex hoc et usque in aeternum.
And lest we believe there is light protection in the apostles, or the patriarchs and prophets, or rather in the angels, who surround the church with a kind of guard, there was added: "And the Lord is round about his people from this time forth and for ever." But perhaps the guard of apostles or angels may be thought sufficient. That is indeed so; but let us hear Moses too. For when the Lord had said to him, "Behold, my angel will go before you," he answered: "Unless you walk with me, do not send me away from here." The protection of angels is good, but that of the Lord is better. Our soul is sought by many snares, many arms are fought with against us. Neither earth nor seas nor air is free from danger to our faith. The rare gems of the unknown sea seize our eyes, the gold of the earth occupies the mind; the spiritual wickednesses and powers of this air fly around us with the familiar allurements of our death, lying in wait through the troubles of present life, through the manners and wantonness of another's will, that we may be angry, may hate, may love: we are watched and sought on every side. So the Lord, knowing that our fight is not against flesh and blood but against the mighty ones of this world and spiritual wickednesses, says, completing the gospels: "Behold, I am with you all days until the consummation of the age." For he is present; and when he is faithfully called upon, he is present by his nature. For he is Spirit, penetrating and containing all things. For he is not bodily, as we are, so that when he is present somewhere he is absent from elsewhere; but by a present power, extending itself wherever anything is, since he is in all things by his Spirit filling all things, he nevertheless stands by the one who believes in him. For he will be present even with three or two gathered in his name, and he is round about all his people from this time forth and for ever.
124.7CSEL 22:602–603
Sed quid sibi uult, esse eum in circuitu populi sui ex hoc et usque in saeculum? quia non relinquet uirgam peccatorum super sortem iustorum, ut non extendant iusti in iniquitatem manus suas. in uirga potestatem intellegi conuenit; insigne enim potestatis est. uirgam accepit Moyses, qua posset omnia; fuit et uirga Aaron. sed fuit et uirga Pharao, fuit et uirga Nabuchodonosor. ergo in circuitu nos dominus custodit, ne super sortem nostram peccatorum uirga derelinquatur. ueniunt quidem tribulationes. sed non permanent; ueniunt persecutiones, sed non persistunt. multi redigere libertatem fidei nostrae in captiuitatem uolunt, sed confessionis nostrae, quam in Christo habemus, nemo dominatur. non enim super sortem nostram peccatoris uirga derelinquetur. dominus namque in circuitu populi sui est in aeternum, ne uicti et fatigati uirgae imperio in iniquitatem extendamus manus nostras. sed uirga cum inciderit, auferetur; et peccator cum incubuerit, non derelinquetur. breue est, quidquid patiemur ab aduersariis dei: et habet uictoriam et praemium, licet non habeat proelii longi laborem. dominus adest. etiam si uis aliqua conpellet, abstineamus manus nostras ab iniquitatibus, non extendamus opera nostra in peccata, quia domino in circuitu nobis constituto uirga peccatoris non derelinquetur, ut maneat.
But what does it mean that he is round about his people from this time forth and for ever? "Because he will not leave the rod of sinners upon the lot of the righteous, lest the righteous stretch out their hands to iniquity." By the rod power should be understood; for it is the emblem of power. Moses received a rod by which he could do all things; there was also the rod of Aaron. But there was also the rod of Pharaoh, and the rod of Nebuchadnezzar. So the Lord guards us round about, lest the rod of sinners be left upon our lot. Tribulations come, but they do not remain; persecutions come, but they do not persist. Many want to bring the freedom of our faith into captivity, but no one rules over our confession, which we have in Christ. For the rod of the sinner will not be left upon our lot. For the Lord is round about his people for ever, lest, conquered and wearied by the rule of the rod, we stretch out our hands to iniquity. But when the rod has fallen, it will be taken away; and when the sinner has pressed upon us, he will not be left. Whatever we suffer from God's adversaries is short: and it has victory and reward, though it does not have the labor of a long battle. The Lord is present. Even if some force compels, let us keep our hands from iniquities, let us not stretch out our works to sins, because, with the Lord set round about us, the rod of the sinner will not be left to remain.
124.8CSEL 22:603
Post quae conuersio fit prophetae retributionem a domino ei, qui ab iniquitate manus abstinuerit, inprecantis: benefac, domine, bonis et rectis corde; probitatem et facti et uoluntatis in utroque significans. multis enim uel propter hominum fauorem, uel propter periculum et metum facti opus bonum est. uerum nisi ex uoluntate boni simus, etiamsi hominibus boni uidebimur, tamen deo boni non sumus, quia perfecta bonitas in recti cordis consistit adfectu.
After this the prophet turns to pray for a reward from the Lord for the one who has kept his hands from iniquity: "Do good, Lord, to the good and to the upright of heart," signifying uprightness both of deed and of will in both. For many do a good work either for the favor of men, or because of danger and fear of the deed. But unless we are good from the will, even if we seem good to men, we are not good to God, because perfect goodness consists in the feeling of an upright heart.
124.9CSEL 22:603–604
Retributio autem ut bonis adest, ita et malis non abest. nam sequitur: declinantes autem ad obligationes adducet dominus cum operantibus iniquitatem. et hic quoque duplicis significantiae sermo est. declinantium ad obligationes et operantium iniquitates. qui declinant, ex alio in aliud declinant. id est ex bonis operibus recti cordis in obligationes. et quas esse obligationes existimabimus? eas nempe, quas solui propheta monuit dicens: non tale ieiunium elegi, dicit dominus; sed solue omne uinculum iniquitatis. dissolue obligationes uehementium commutationum. si quis ergo se a praeceptis dei declinans his obligationibus conligauerit, adducetur cum operantibus iniquitatem, in eandem scilicet sententiae poenam transgressor et inicus futurus. qui enim operatur iniquitatem, legis alienus est: qui autem declinat ex lege, legem, in qua mansit ante, transgreditur.
But as reward is present for the good, so it is not absent for the evil. For there follows: "But those who turn aside to bonds the Lord will lead away with those who work iniquity." Here too the saying has a double meaning: of those who turn aside to bonds and of those who work iniquities. Those who turn aside turn from one thing to another, that is, from the good works of an upright heart into bonds. And what shall we think the bonds are? Surely those the prophet warned to be loosed, saying: "I have not chosen such a fast, says the Lord; but loose every bond of iniquity, undo the bonds of violent exchanges." So if anyone, turning aside from God's precepts, binds himself with these bonds, he will be led away with those who work iniquity, the transgressor and the unjust man being destined to the same punishment of sentence. For one who works iniquity is a stranger to the law; but one who turns aside from the law transgresses the law in which he remained before.
124.10CSEL 22:604
Non declinandum igitur ad obligationes est; neque libertas nostra est nexibus saeculi et mundialium negotiorum uinculis inserenda. nouit Paulus beatus solutos ligari non oportere, cum dicit: solutus es ab uxore? noli quaerere ligationem. et hoc non de criminoso uinculo necessariae ligationis ita sensit. ceterum sunt alia uincula, quae fidem nostram impediunt et obligant sibique conectunt: maxime augendae pecuniae labor et negotiandi insincerus profectus. haec enim ita obligant peccatis, sacramentis, commerciis, ut sibi nos captos possessosque detineant. ab his ergo omnis mens, uoluntas, studium soluendum est, quia declinantes ad obligationes una adducentur cum operantibus iniquitatem.
So we must not turn aside to bonds; nor must our freedom be put into the knots of the world and the chains of worldly business. Blessed Paul knows that those who are loosed must not be bound, when he says: "Are you loosed from a wife? Do not seek a binding." And he did not mean this of a criminal chain of necessary binding. But there are other chains which hinder our faith, bind it, and tie it to themselves: above all the labor of increasing money and the insincere profit of trading. For these so bind with sins, oaths, and dealings that they hold us captured and possessed for themselves. From these, then, every mind, will, and pursuit must be loosed, because those who turn aside to bonds will be led away together with those who work iniquity.
124.11CSEL 22:604–605
Erit autem Israhel pacificus non derelicta super se uirga peccatoris; sed in fide perfecta ac spe aeterna manens audiet pro portione sibi dici: pax super Israhel. ille est enim pax nostra, qui fecit utraque unum, dominus noster Iesus Christus, qui est benedictus in saecula. amen.
And Israel will be peaceful, the rod of the sinner not being left upon him; but remaining in perfect faith and eternal hope he will hear it said to him for his portion: "Peace upon Israel." For he is our peace, who has made both one, our Lord Jesus Christ, who is blessed for ever. Amen.
Tractates 125
125.1CSEL 22:605
Nisi essent in psalmis quaedam tales prophetise, ut in res atque homines eorum temporum, quibus scripta sunt, non conuenirent, profecto auderent multi nihil in psalmis spiritaliter dictum existimare putarentque nos quasdam commenticias assertiones et ementitas interpretationes inquirere, quibus uideremur altius nescio quid ac profundius ceterorum sensu intellexisse, proinde quasi nos sensui nostro ea, quae scripta sunt, coaptemus et non magis ex his, quae scripta sunt, sensum diligentis et sollicitae intellegentiae consequamur. scriptura enim legis manet atque est anterioribus quam adesset dominus, temporibus consummata a prophetis, edita a Iudaeis, pertractata a regibus, suscepta a gentibus, sed intellecta et probata a Christianis.
Were there not in the psalms certain prophecies of such a kind that they do not fit the affairs and men of the times in which they were written, many would surely dare to think that nothing in the psalms was spoken spiritually, and would think that we search out certain invented assertions and false interpretations, by which we might seem to have understood something higher and deeper than the sense of others, as though we fit what is written to our sense, and do not rather attain from what is written the sense of a careful and anxious understanding. For the Scripture of the law remains, completed by the prophets in times before the Lord was present, published by the Jews, handled by kings, received by the nations, but understood and proved by Christians.
125.2CSEL 22:605–606
Hoc forte insolens existimetur. plane insolens est, si nobis hanc gloriam praesumimus, si tantum infirmitati nostrae licere uolumus, ut tantis temporibus abstrusa, tantis humani generis obscura aetatibus, in quibus intellegendis frustra reges laborauerint, ipsi doctores et magistri legis errauerint, nos stulti saeculo et purgamenta mundi et deliramenta sapientibus eorum intellegentia gloriemur. sed tamen intellegimus, quia non mendax est, qui dixit: petite, et dabitur uobis; quaerite, et inuenietis; pulsate, et aperietur uobis; et scriptum est, quia qui dixit: quoniam oportebat impleri omnia, quae scripta sunt in lege Moysi et in prophetis et in psalmis de me, tunc aperuit sensum eorum, ut intellegerent scripturas, et dixit illis: quoniam sic scriptum est, Christum pati et resurgere ex mortuis tertia die et praedicari in nomine eius paenitentiam et remissionem peccatorum in omnes gentes. non ergo ex nobis est, quod intellegimus, sed ex eo, qui, quae ignorabilia erant, fecit intellegi. itaque ab eo speranda intellegentia est, qui et pulsantibus aperiet et quaerentibus demonstrabit et petentibus non negabit.
This will perhaps be thought insolent. It is plainly insolent if we claim this glory for ourselves, if we wish so much to be allowed to our weakness, that we, fools to the world, the refuse of the world, and madness to its wise men, should boast of understanding things hidden for so many times, obscure for so many ages of the human race, in understanding which kings labored in vain and the very teachers and masters of the law erred. But nevertheless we understand, because he is no liar who said, "Ask, and it will be given you; seek, and you will find; knock, and it will be opened to you"; and it is written that he who said, "For all things had to be fulfilled that are written in the law of Moses and in the prophets and in the psalms concerning me," then opened their mind so that they might understand the Scriptures, and said to them: "For thus it is written, that the Christ should suffer and rise from the dead on the third day, and that repentance and forgiveness of sins should be preached in his name to all nations." So what we understand is not from ourselves, but from him who made what was unknowable understood. So understanding is to be hoped for from him who will open to those who knock, show to those who seek, and not refuse to those who ask.
125.3CSEL 22:606–607
Nam quomodo intellegi poterit hic psalmus, qui a rerum gestarum historia dissentit? nusquam enim captiuitas populi huius usque ad Dauid tempora scribitur: sed longe postea quam Salomon filius eius regnum obtinuit, seruiuit captus Israhel Assyriis, dehinc Iuda Babyloniis. quomodo ergo Dauid in eodem psalmo tamquam captus orat? aut quomodo auersa a se captiuitate laetatur dicens: in auertendo dominum captiuitatem Sion facti sumus tamquam consolati. tunc repletum est gaudio os nostrum et lingua nostra exultatione. tunc dicent inter gentes: magnificauit dominus facere cum illis? quamquam autem religiosum sit existimare, futurae captiuitatis demutationem secundum prophetiae scientiam praenuntiatam fuisse et ea, quae indubitate essent gerenda, per fidem gerendorum commemorasse pro gestis, tamen dictorum uerborumque uirtus eius reditus gratulationem, qui post captiuitatem Babyloniae indultus est, nunc nos intellegere non patitur: cum praesertim eundem reditum grauior postea sit consecuta captiuitas, et indignum propheta sit, tamquam ignorantia amoto omni captiuitatis obprobrio gratulari, cum indemutabili rursus obprobrio captiuitas iterata successerit. est autem nunc omnis in psalmo, sicuti singularum rerum expositione monstrabimus, ex captiuitate uitiorum in libertatem cognitionis dei redeuntis animae gratulatio.
For how can this psalm be understood, which disagrees with the history of events? For nowhere is the captivity of this people written of up to the times of David, but long after, when Solomon his son held the kingdom, Israel was captured and served the Assyrians, then Judah the Babylonians. How then does David pray in this psalm as one captured? Or how does he rejoice that captivity has been turned away from him, saying: "When the Lord turned back the captivity of Zion, we became as those comforted. Then our mouth was filled with joy and our tongue with exultation. Then they will say among the nations: The Lord has done great things for them"? But although it is pious to think that the change of the future captivity was foretold according to the knowledge of prophecy, and that things which would certainly be done were recalled as done through faith in their doing, yet the force of the sayings and words does not now allow us to understand the rejoicing over that return which was granted after the Babylonian captivity: especially since a heavier captivity afterwards followed that same return, and it is unworthy of the prophet to rejoice, as if in ignorance, as though all reproach of captivity had been removed, when captivity was repeated with an unchangeable reproach. But the whole psalm now is, as we shall show by explaining each thing, the rejoicing of the soul returning from the captivity of vices into the freedom of the knowledge of God.
125.4CSEL 22:607–608
Et quidem grauis est captiuitas corporalis, quae iure libertatis amisso uictorum dominatui subditur. et seruiunt tunc quidem corpora, sed nequaquam capitur fidelis animae libertas. testes sunt mihi tres pueri inter flammas cantantes, testis Daniel in fame leonum prophetae prandio satur, testis Eleazar inter iura dominorum patriis suis legibus liber, testes cum anu sua martyres septem deo gratias inter noua mortis tormenta referentes. at uero quanto infelicior est animae captiuitas! si eam auaritia ceperit, per corpus latrocinatur ac grassatur; si libido uicerit, communicat cum corpore seruitutem; si luxus, ira, odium, temeritas, ebrietas, inuidia subegerit, his imperantibus sibi dominis et anima et corpus in commune famulantur: atque ita captiuitatem animae et corporis sequitur captiuitas. ceterum condicionem corporis religiosae animae generositas despicit. officium quidem durum, tamen homini non omnino miserabile, quia et seruiatur a seruis: at uero animae captiuitas quam infelix est!
And indeed bodily captivity is heavy, which, the right of freedom lost, is subjected to the dominion of the conquerors. And then bodies indeed serve, but the freedom of the faithful soul is in no way captured. Witnesses for me are the three youths singing amid the flames, witness Daniel in the hunger of the lions, filled with the prophet's meal, witness Eleazar, free by his fathers' laws amid the decrees of masters, witnesses the seven martyrs with their aged mother giving thanks to God amid new torments of death. But how much more unhappy is the captivity of the soul! If greed has captured it, it robs and plunders through the body; if lust has conquered, it shares its slavery with the body; if luxury, anger, hatred, rashness, drunkenness, envy have subdued it, under these masters ruling it both soul and body serve in common: and so captivity of the body follows the captivity of the soul. But the nobility of a religious soul despises the condition of the body. The service is hard, yet not wholly pitiable for a man, since there is service even by slaves: but how unhappy is the captivity of the soul!
125.5CSEL 22:608
Auarus cariturus semetipso carere timet pecunia; negotiosus, tristis, anxius, sine requie ulla damni metu semper detinetur; honestatis inmemor est, amicitiarum inobseruans, humanitatis fugax, religionem nescit, bonitatem omnino odit. at uero cui libido domina est, in quo caeno dedecoris uolutatur! pendet ad occasiones adulteriorum; anxius circa lasciuiae suae furta oculis, mente, corpore totus in scortis est. uidens cotidie atque audiens humanas in adulteros leges adulterium in ipso foro cogitat; quod agit, timet; quod timet, non fugit. quid uero infelicius ebrietatis dominatu? uentri ultra capacitatem infundere, officium suum corpori inuidere, sensui rationem adimere, non loqui, non meminisse, non stare et mortem quandam naturae incolumi imperare? quam dedecorus autem est furentium motus, temeritatis impetus, odiorum stimulus, liuoris anxietas? quanta ergo perturbatio eorum est, quanta calamitas, qui supra memoratis malis seruiunt!
The greedy man, about to lose himself, fears to lose his money; busy, gloomy, anxious, without any rest, he is always held by fear of loss; he is forgetful of honor, heedless of friendships, a fugitive from humanity, ignorant of religion, wholly hating goodness. But he whose mistress is lust, in what mud of disgrace does he wallow! He hangs on the occasions for adulteries; anxious about the secret thefts of his lust, he is wholly given to harlots with eyes, mind, and body. Seeing and hearing daily the human laws against adulterers, he plans adultery in the very forum; what he does, he fears; what he fears, he does not flee. And what is more unhappy than the dominion of drunkenness? To pour into the belly beyond its capacity, to begrudge the body its office, to take reason from the sense, not to speak, not to remember, not to stand, and to impose a kind of death on a sound nature? How disgraceful is the motion of the raging, the onrush of rashness, the goad of hatreds, the anxiety of envy? How great, then, is the confusion, how great the calamity of those who serve the evils mentioned above!
125.6CSEL 22:608–609
Verum si cognita sapientiae doctrina et dei praedicatione et remissione uniuersorum peccatorum et resurrectione corporum et aeternitatis consortio et regno caelesti a dominatibus superioribus de auaritia ad munificentiam transeamus, de libidinibus ad continentiam migremus, de ebrietate ad ieiunia reuertamur, de furore, temeritate, odio, liuore ad placabilitatem, rationem, misericordiam, benignitatem euolemus discentes haec omnia a lege, prophetis, euangeliis, apostolis et cantantes ex lege: dominus conterens bella, dominus nomen est ei, cognoscentes a propheta: ego sum, qui feci caelum et terram ex nihilo, credentes ab euangelio: in principio erat uerbum et uerbum erat apud deum et deus erat uerbum, pronuntiantes ab apostolo: qui est imago dei inuisibilis, primogenitus omnis creaturae, quia in ipso constituta sunt omnia in caelis et in terra, et cum gentes conuersionem nostram ex uitiis in uirtutes, ex ignorantia dei in confessionem eius effectam admirabuntur, tunc psalmi prophetiam a nobis intellegi posse testabimur dicentes: in auertendo dominum captiuitatem Sion, facti sumus sicut consolati. tunc repletum est gaudio os nostrum et lingua nostra exultatione. tunc dicent inter gentes: magnificauit dominus facere cum illis. auertit enim deus captiuitatem nostram per remissionem peccatorum. a dominatu enim uitiorum animam liberauit anteriora delicta non reputans et nos in uitam nouam renouans et in nouum hominem transformans, constituens nos in corpore carnis suae. ipse est enim ecclesia, per sacramentum corporis sui in se uniuersam eam continens. non erat Sion ante, quam liberaretur; sed Sion est, quae liberata est. nomen cum libertate conuenit. neque enim manentis, sed auersae captiuitatis hoc nomen est.
But if, having learned the teaching of wisdom and the preaching of God, the forgiveness of all sins, the resurrection of bodies, the fellowship of eternity, and the heavenly kingdom, we pass from the masters above, from greed to generosity, migrate from lusts to continence, return from drunkenness to fasts, fly from rage, rashness, hatred, and envy to gentleness, reason, mercy, and kindness, learning all these from the law, the prophets, the gospels, and the apostles, and singing from the law, "The Lord who crushes wars, the Lord is his name," learning from the prophet, "I am he who made heaven and earth from nothing," believing from the gospel, "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God," proclaiming from the apostle, "who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation, because in him all things were established in heaven and on earth," and when the nations marvel at our conversion from vices to virtues, from ignorance of God to confession of him, then we shall testify that the prophecy of the psalm can be understood by us, saying: "When the Lord turned back the captivity of Zion, we became as those comforted. Then our mouth was filled with joy and our tongue with exultation. Then they will say among the nations: The Lord has done great things for them." For God turned back our captivity through the forgiveness of sins. For he freed the soul from the dominion of vices, not reckoning former offenses, renewing us into new life and transforming us into the new man, establishing us in the body of his flesh. For he himself is the church, containing it all in himself through the mystery of his body. Zion did not exist before it was freed; but Zion is what has been freed. The name agrees with freedom. For it is the name not of a remaining but of a turned-back captivity.
125.7CSEL 22:609–610
Quod uero ait: facti sumus tamquam consolati, meminit et Paulus interim tamquam consolatum esse se dicens: miser ego homo, quis me liberabit a corpore mortis huius? et qui nunc pro parte scit et pro parte prophetat et qui scit repositam nobis esse Hierusalem in caelo et cum dicit: dissolui me melius est et cum Christo manere. sumus quidem nunc consolati, quia dominus ait: mittet uobis et alium consolatorem. cum dicit: alium, superesse se docet. superest enim; expectat namque omnis creatura reuelationem filiorum dei. reuelatio illa consummata consolatio est. ceterum nunc tamquam consolatio est; ipsa interim non carentes, licet sit consummationis suae nobis residua perfectio.
As for his saying, "We became as those comforted," Paul too remembers that he is meanwhile as one comforted, saying: "Wretched man that I am, who will free me from the body of this death?"; he who now knows in part and prophesies in part, and who knows that Jerusalem is laid up for us in heaven, and when he says: "To be dissolved is better for me, and to remain with Christ." We are indeed now comforted, because the Lord says: "He will send you another Comforter." When he says "another," he teaches that he himself remains. For it remains; for the whole creation awaits the revelation of the sons of God. That revelation is consummated comfort. But now it is "as" comfort; not lacking it meanwhile, though the perfection of its consummation remains for us.
125.8CSEL 22:610
Repletur etiam gaudio os nostrum et lingua nostra exultatione; non enim sufficientia sunt ad referendas deo laudes linguae nostrae atque oris officia. mutauimus crimina in innocentiam, uitia in uirtutes, ignorantiam in cognitionem, interitum in inmortalitatem: et hoc deo faciente gratiam paenitendorum et nouorum bonorum initia reddente. quod enim optabilius nobis est tempus? quo adulterabamus aut quo maluissemus uirgines fuisse? quo ebrii eramus aut quo in ieiuniis laetamur? quo pecuniae seruiebamus aut quo pecunia nostrae benignitatis est usus? quo daemonia adorabamus aut quo daemoniis imperamus? quo placere saeculo gestiebamus aut quo saeculum uincimus? quo deum nesciebamus aut quo heredes deo praeparamur?
Our mouth too is filled with joy and our tongue with exultation; for the services of our tongue and mouth are not sufficient to render praises to God. We have changed crimes into innocence, vices into virtues, ignorance into knowledge, death into immortality: and this by God's doing, giving the grace of repenting and the beginnings of new goods. For which time is more desirable to us? That in which we committed adultery, or that in which we would rather have been virgins? That in which we were drunk, or that in which we rejoice in fasts? That in which we served money, or that in which money serves our kindness? That in which we worshipped demons, or that in which we command demons? That in which we longed to please the world, or that in which we conquer the world? That in which we did not know God, or that in which we are prepared as heirs to God?
125.9CSEL 22:610–611
Hanc spei nostrae fidem gentes contemplantes dicunt: magnificauit dominus facere cum illis. hanc in uirtutes uitiorum demutationem contuentes dei in nos magnificentiam admirantur. idipsum etiam ex sensu adepta huius beatitudinis nos quoque confitemur in oris gaudio et exultatione linguae: magnificauit dominus facere nobiscum: facti sumus laetantes. laetamur enim de profundo ac miserabili caeno ablutos nos fuisse et nouos ex omnibus uitae anterioris uitiis constitisse.
The nations, beholding this faith of our hope, say: "The Lord has done great things for them." Seeing this change of vices into virtues, they marvel at God's magnificence toward us. We too, from the sense of this blessedness we have gained, confess the very same thing in the joy of the mouth and the exultation of the tongue: "The Lord has done great things with us; we have become glad." For we rejoice that we have been washed from deep and pitiable mud and have been made new from all the vices of our former life.
125.10CSEL 22:611–612
Et quia propheta futurae spei gaudia loquebatur, licet secundum scripturae consuetudinem tamquam de praeteritis gratularetur, tamen per consequentem precem non sui temporis res has esse declarat dicens: conuerte, domine, captiuitatem nostram. si fuit tamquam consolatus, cum auersa est captiuitas, quomodo nunc ut a se auertatur orat? sed in superioribus propheticae scientiae fuit sermo futurorum gaudia tamquam de praeterito nuntiantis; nunc autem de auertendis communis oratio est, cui se propheta, tamquam et ipse sit captus, admisceat, tamquam adhuc in isdem se esse cognoscat. scriptum est enim: iustus in principio sermonis sui ipse sibi accusator est et rursum: confitere primum peccata tua, ut iustificeris, et: beati lugentes, quoniam ipsi consolabuntur. scit quidem propheta se liberum; sed tamquam captus deo subditus est siue per propriae confessionis disciplinam, quia, ubi peccati confessio est, ibi et iustificatio a deo est, quod in publicano et pharisaeo dominus testatus est, cum pharisaeus iustum se gloriatus est, publicanus uero pro peccatis orasset; ait enim: amen dico uobis, quia magis iustificatus est publicanus quam pharisaeus — siue ergo ob id propheta conuerti captiuitatem communem precatur, seu quod populum omnem a peccatis captum sciebat; et sicut cum apostolo membro uni corpus omne conpatitur, ita et populo captiuo a peccatis propheta concaptus est
And because the prophet was speaking of the joys of future hope, although according to the custom of Scripture he rejoiced as over things past, yet by the following prayer he declares that these things are not of his own time, saying: "Turn back, Lord, our captivity." If he was as one comforted when the captivity was turned away, how does he now pray that it be turned away from him? But above, the word was that of prophetic knowledge, announcing future joys as past; but now it is a common prayer about things to be turned away, in which the prophet joins himself as though he too were captive, as though he recognized that he is still in the same things. For it is written: "The righteous man at the beginning of his speech is his own accuser," and again: "Confess your sins first, that you may be justified," and: "Blessed are those who mourn, for they will be comforted." The prophet indeed knows himself free; but he is subject to God as one captive, either through the discipline of his own confession, because where there is confession of sin, there is also justification from God, as the Lord testified in the tax collector and the Pharisee, when the Pharisee boasted that he was righteous, but the tax collector prayed for his sins; for he says: "Truly I say to you, the tax collector was justified rather than the Pharisee"; either, then, the prophet prays that the common captivity be turned back for this reason, or because he knew that the whole people was captured by sins; and as, with the apostle, the whole body suffers with one member, so the prophet is captive together with the people captured by sins.
125.11CSEL 22:612–613
Sed tamen orare pro captiuitate sua bonum sibi esse demonstrat dicens: qui seminat in lacrimis, in gaudio metet. euntes ibant et flebant mittentes semina sua. uenientes autem uenient in exultatione, portantes manipulos suos. quis hic ad Iudaeos sermo est, ut eorum in hoc psalmo uideatur prophetata captiuitas? quae uero ad communem humani generis consuetudinem ratio? quis enim umquam serens fleuit? aut numquid huius lamentabilis sationis Iudaeis usus ex lege est? nequaquam igitur istud scriptum usquam aut gestum est, sed est prophetia superioribus dictis conexa. duas autem esse sationes sanctus apostolus Paulus docuit, carnis et spiritus, demonstratis et enumeratis seminibus sationis utriusque, cum caro adulteria, ueneficia, comisationes, ebrietatem, auaritiam, idololatriam et cetera his similia sereret, spiritus uero pacem, gaudium, continentiam, caritatem, sobrietatem, mansuetudinem et quae sunt his consequentia seminaret, et sata sua uno quoque messuro. cum igitur optimum deo sacrificium sit cor contribulatum et beati sint lugentes, quoniam ipsi consolabuntur et unusquisque, quae seuerit, metet, operum suorum fructus in iudicium tamquam manipulum laturus, seminandum nobis est cum confessione peccatorum, cum luctu corporalis infirmitatis, cum lamentatione ac dolore conscientiae nostrae, quod nequaquam possimus digne praecepta dei secundum propositum uoluntatis explere. tunc quae in lacrimis seuerimus, metemus in gaudio: euntesque flentes cum exultatione ueniemus, repleti fructibus nostris et manipulis. elaboratae a nobis messis onerati, consolati per Christum, qui est benedictus in saecula saeculorum. amen.
But he shows that it is good for him to pray for his captivity, saying: "Those who sow in tears will reap in joy. Going, they went and wept, casting their seeds; but coming, they will come in exultation, carrying their sheaves." What word is this to the Jews, that their captivity should seem prophesied in this psalm? And what reason does it have for the common custom of the human race? For who ever wept while sowing? Or do the Jews have the practice of such lamentable sowing from the law? So this was never written or done anywhere, but it is a prophecy joined to the sayings above. The holy apostle Paul taught that there are two sowings, of the flesh and of the spirit, showing and listing the seeds of each sowing: since the flesh sows adulteries, sorceries, revelries, drunkenness, greed, idolatry, and the like, while the spirit sows peace, joy, continence, love, sobriety, gentleness, and what follows from these, and each one will reap what he has sown. Since, then, the best sacrifice to God is a contrite heart, and blessed are those who mourn, for they will be comforted, and each one will reap what he has sown, about to bring the fruits of his works to the judgment like a sheaf, we must sow with confession of sins, with mourning over bodily weakness, with lament and grief of our conscience, that we can in no way worthily fulfil God's precepts according to the purpose of the will. Then what we have sown in tears we shall reap in joy; and having gone weeping we shall come with exultation, filled with our fruits and sheaves, laden with the harvest we have worked for, comforted through Christ, who is blessed for ever and ever. Amen.
Tractates 126
126.1CSEL 22:613–614
Ratio et temporum et prophetise intentam adhiberi ad praesentem psalmum cognitionis postulat diligentiam, ne forte nos ad inanem intellegentiam absoluta quaedam uerborum species et ipse ille gestorum corporalium ordo sollicitet: maxime cum plures, interiores causas doctrinae propheticse nescientes, sensu Iudaico praeteritorum temporum prophetiam contineri his graduum canticis opinentur, ut ea captiuitas Hierusalem praenuntiata sit, quae sub Ieremiae diebus acciderit, et eiusdem rursum depulsae captiuitatis gratulatio prophetetur, sitque eorum temporum, quae psalmis his enuntiantur, aut seruitutis dolor aut reditus lsetitia. non inprobamus hunc sensum, neque eorum intellegentiam coarguimus. dignum est enim, ut miserabilem populi casum et inpietati eius debitam poenam et post longse seruitutis sufficientem peccatis grauibus satisfactionem et misericordem in eos dei indulto reditu uoluntatem secundum prouidentise scientiam prophetae spiritus praeloquatur.
The present psalm demands that we apply careful attention to the circumstances both of the times and of the prophecy, lest perhaps a mere outward appearance of the words, and that very sequence of bodily events, lure us into an empty understanding: especially since many, not knowing the inner reasons of prophetic teaching, suppose with a Jewish sense that these songs of ascents contain a prophecy of times now past, so that what was foretold is the captivity of Jerusalem that happened in the days of Jeremiah, and what is prophesied is the rejoicing at that same captivity's being removed again, and that what these psalms express belongs to those times, whether the grief of servitude or the joy of return. We do not reject this sense, nor do we refute their understanding. For it is fitting that the Spirit of the prophet should, according to the knowledge of providence, speak beforehand of the pitiable fall of the people, the punishment due to its impiety, the satisfaction, after long servitude, sufficient for grave sins, and God's merciful will toward them in granting their return.
126.2CSEL 22:614–615
Verum cum captiuitatis illius reditum grauior sit et inremissa consecuta captiuitas et sedificationem ciuitatis receptse miserabilis maneat et non demutanda uastatio, sciantque et spiritalis reditus gloriam Israhel reliquo reseruari et caelestis ac sanctse; Hierusalem sedificationem usque ad beati et dominici regni tempora conparari, maximeque cum spes illorum dierum atque res omnium horum psalmorum uirtutes et genera testentur: non intellego, cur tantum de caducis ac demutabilibus malis ac non etiam de aeternis esse uelint prophetiae dolorem et temporalium magis gaudiorum et eorum, quse grauissimae postea demutaturse essent calamitates, potius quam indemutabilium et aeternorum intellegant demonstratam esse lsetitiam, cum magnificentise propheticse magis dignum sit beata et aeterna et caelestia praedicasse. quamquam igitur psalmi superiores captiuitatem non corporalem tantum et terrenam, sicuti libertatem non caducam, non praesentem, non ssecularem in se demonstrati sint continere, tamen etiam hic quoque psalmus nihil in se terrenum, nihil humile, nihil praeteritis temporibus conueniens intellegitur esse conplexus. sed secundum propheticam et euangelicam et apostolicam auctoritatem eas spes omnes praenuntiare, in quas se patriarcharum desiderium, sanctorum expectatio, apostolorum fides, martyrum confessio et omnium credentium cursus extendit, id est in sancta tempora, in aeternae ciuitatis incolatum atque coetum, in regni dominici beatitudinem, in spiritalis libertatis nouam gloriam. in consortium diuinse seternitatis et regni. atque ut id absolutius intellegatur, ipsas illas uerborum uirtutes proprietatesque tractemus.
But since a heavier and unremitting captivity followed upon the return from that captivity, and the rebuilding of the recovered city is succeeded by a pitiable and unchangeable devastation; and since they know that the glory of a spiritual return is reserved for the remnant of Israel, and that the building of the heavenly and holy Jerusalem is being prepared until the times of the blessed kingdom of the Lord; and above all since the hope of those days and the substance of them are attested by the force and character of all these psalms: I do not understand why they would have the grief of the prophecy concern only perishable and changeable evils and not also eternal ones, and why they understand the joy shown to be joy over temporal things, and over things that were afterward to be changed into the gravest calamities, rather than over unchangeable and eternal things, since it is more worthy of prophetic magnificence to have proclaimed what is blessed, eternal, and heavenly. Although, then, the preceding psalms have been shown to contain a captivity that is not only bodily and earthly, just as a freedom that is not perishable, not present, not of this world, yet this psalm too is understood to contain nothing earthly, nothing lowly, nothing suited to past times. Rather, according to prophetic, evangelical, and apostolic authority, it foretells all those hopes toward which the longing of the patriarchs, the expectation of the saints, the faith of the apostles, the confession of the martyrs, and the course of all believers stretch out: that is, toward the holy times, toward residence and fellowship in the eternal city, toward the blessedness of the Lord's kingdom, toward the new glory of spiritual freedom, toward partnership in divine eternity and kingdom. And so that this may be understood more completely, let us treat the force and the proper meanings of the words themselves.
126.3CSEL 22:615–616
Nisi dominus aedificauerit sibi domum, in uanum laborauerunt, qui sedificant eam. nisi dominus custodierit ciuitatem, in uanum uigilauerunt. qui custodiunt eam. in uanum est uobis diluculo surgere. uolunt plures Salomonem sedificationi ciuitatis et templi studentem in eo ipso molitionis suae tempore euersionem ciuitatis ac templi, quod conderet. prophetasse. quia et titulus ante latus auctorem eum psalmi huius esse demonstret. magnis enim uiribus et totis regni sui opibus magnificum aliquid et deo dignum efficere temptabat. nam ad centum quinquaginta milia uirorum, sicut scriptum est, in diuersos sedificationis usus ac ministeria occupabantur. et quamquam instituta a se consuetudine perfectis omnibus maxima custodiae ciuitatis et templi sollicitudo esset adhibenda, tamen, cum non ignoraret inanem tanti laboris operationem futuram, ciuitatem eandem a Babyloniis ob peccata populi diruendam, ista dixisse: nisi dominus sedificauerit sibi domum, in cassum laborauerunt aedificantes eam. putant autem prophetiam hanc consummatam in ea tempora fuisse, quibus post captiuitatem populi Dario rege reditum inpertiente aedificata rursum per Zorobabel et Iosedec ciuitas fuit.
"Unless the Lord build the house for himself, they have labored in vain who build it. Unless the Lord guard the city, they have kept watch in vain who guard it. It is vain for you to rise at dawn." Many hold that Solomon, while intent on building the city and the temple, at the very time of his construction prophesied the overthrow of the city and temple he was founding, since the title too shows him to be the author of this psalm. For with great resources and all the wealth of his kingdom he was attempting to accomplish something magnificent and worthy of God; for, as it is written, as many as one hundred and fifty thousand men were occupied in the various uses and services of the building. And although, when everything was completed, the greatest care for guarding the city and the temple had to be applied by the practice he had himself established, yet, since he was not unaware that the work of so great a labor would prove vain, and that this same city would be torn down by the Babylonians because of the sins of the people, they say he spoke these words: "Unless the Lord build the house for himself, they have labored to no purpose who build it." They think, moreover, that this prophecy was fulfilled in the times when, after the captivity, King Darius granted the people their return, and the city was rebuilt by Zorobabel and Josedec.
126.4CSEL 22:616
Quorum inopem sensum ipsa illa posset consummatio aedificationis arguere. nam per Aggaeum prophetam ita ad hos eosdem restauratores Hierusalem dominus est locutus: adhuc semel, ego moueo caelum et terram et mare et aridam; et subuertam sedes regum. psalmi ergo uirtus non in tempora tantum Salomonis, sed etiam in Aggsei intellegenda est conuenire. sedificationis enim utriusque labor uanus est. sedificata namque per Zorobabel ciuitas solum hodie ex se conflagrationis suae cinerem et deformium ruinarum praebet foeditatem. et has sedes regum, quas se aedificatores ad regni aeterni gloriam restaurare arbitrabantur, uastatio iterata subuertit sede adhuc etiam ceterorum subuertenda regnorum.
The completion of the building itself could refute their poor sense. For through the prophet Haggai the Lord spoke thus to these same restorers of Jerusalem: "Yet once more I shake heaven and earth and sea and dry land, and I will overturn the thrones of kings." The force of the psalm, then, is to be understood as fitting not only the times of Solomon but also those of Haggai. For the labor of both buildings is vain: the city built by Zerubbabel today offers nothing of itself but the ash of its burning and the ugliness of shapeless ruins. And these thrones of kings, which the builders thought they were restoring for the glory of an eternal kingdom, a repeated devastation has overturned, while the throne of the other kingdoms is still to be overturned.
126.5CSEL 22:616–617
Bene autem inania humani generis propheta esse opera prophetauit. scit inutiles esse humanarum custodiarum uigilias. scit in cassum esse consurgentium matutinas sollicitudines. ciuitas et a se instituta et ab aliis restaurata iam nulla est: non profecit aedificatio uel prima uel consequens. et recte ipse ille euertendae ciuitatis propheta est, qui auctor fuerat extruendse. a deo ergo domus est aedificanda, quae maneat, quia nisi quae a domino sedificata sit, non manebit. a deo ciuitas est custodienda. ne pereat, quia nisi a deo custodita sit ciuitas, diruetur. et primum, quae domus dei sit, intellegamus, ut per id cognosci possit, quatenus ab eo aedificanda mansura sit.
Rightly, then, did the prophet prophesy that the works of the human race are empty. He knows that the watches of human guards are useless; he knows that the morning cares of those who rise early are to no purpose. The city, both founded by him and restored by others, is now nothing: neither the first building nor the later one availed. And rightly is he himself the prophet of the city's overthrow who had been the author of its construction. The house, then, that is to remain must be built by God, because unless it is built by the Lord it will not remain. The city must be guarded by God so that it may not perish, because unless the city is guarded by God it will be torn down. And first let us understand what the house of God is, so that through this it may be known in what way, being built by him, it is to remain.
126.6CSEL 22:617
Domus est habitantis habitatio. sermo enim diuinus secundum intellegentise nostrae consuetudinem naturamque se temperat communibus rerum uocabulis ad significationem doctrinae suae et institutionis aptatis. nobis enim. non sibi loquitur, atque ideo nostris utitur in loquendo. conuentus quidem ecclesiarum, siue tum templi, quos ad secretam sacramentorum religionem sedificiorum septa concludunt, consuetudo nostra uel domum dei solita est nuncupare uel templum. scriptura quoque uel prophetica uel apostolica ad demonstrationem locorum his est usa nominibus. uerum non hanc, quae a nobis ac nobiscum ita nuncupatur, domum dei esse ex ipsius dictis docemur. ait enim: caelum mihi sedes est, terra autem scamellum pedum meorum: quam domum aedificabitis mihi, aut quis locus erit requietionis meae? nonne haec omnia fecit manus mea? non concluditur ergo aedificiorum domibus infinitus deus, nec locis in aliquo continetur uirtus inmensa, quae omnia est operata, apostolo idipsum ita testante: deus, qui fecit mundum et omnia, quae in eo: hic cum sit caeli et terrae dominus, non in manu factis templis habitat.
A house is the dwelling of one who dwells in it. For the divine word adapts itself to the habit and nature of our understanding, fitting the common names of things to the expression of its teaching and instruction; for it speaks to us, not to itself, and therefore uses our words in speaking. Our custom, indeed, has been to call the assemblies of the churches, or in those days of the temple, which the enclosures of buildings shut in for the secret worship of the mysteries, either the house of God or the temple; and Scripture too, prophetic or apostolic, has used these names to designate places. But we are taught by his own words that this, which is so called by us and among us, is not the house of God. For he says: "Heaven is my throne, and the earth the footstool of my feet: what house will you build for me, or what will be the place of my rest? Did not my hand make all these things?" The infinite God, then, is not shut in by the houses of buildings, nor is the boundless power that made all things contained in any places, as the apostle testifies to this very thing: "God, who made the world and all that is in it, since he is Lord of heaven and earth, does not dwell in temples made with hands."
126.7CSEL 22:617–618
Nulla ergo dei requies est, nulla habitatio? et forte nequaquam creditur esse, qui nusquam est. audiamus ergo ipsum de requie sua et habitatione testantem; ait enim: hsec requies mea in saeculum sseculi: hic habitabo, quoniam elegi eam. elegit autem Sion; sed numquid eam, de qua praesens prophetise huius querella est: nisi dominus aedificauerit domum, in uanum laborauerunt, qui aedificant eam? Sion, in qua templum fuerat, euersa est: et ubi sedes domini aeterna? ubi requies sempiterna? quod habitabile ei templum? nempe illud, de quo dictum est: uos estis templum dei, et spiritus dei habitat in uobis. haec domus et hoc dei templum est, doctrinis et uirtutibus dei plenum et sanctitate cordis diuini capax incolatus, de quo hic idem propheta ita testatus est: sanctum templum tuum, mirabile in sequitate. sanctitas, sanctitas, continentia humana deo templum est.
Has God, then, no rest, no dwelling? And perhaps one who is nowhere is not believed to exist at all. Let us hear him, then, testifying of his own rest and dwelling; for he says: "This is my rest for ever and ever; here I will dwell, for I have chosen it." He chose Zion. But surely not that Zion about which the present prophecy makes its complaint: "Unless the Lord build the house, they have labored in vain who build it"? Zion, in which the temple had been, has been overthrown: and where is the Lord's eternal throne? Where his everlasting rest? What temple is habitable for him? Surely that of which it is said: "You are the temple of God, and the Spirit of God dwells in you." This is the house and this is the temple of God, full of God's teachings and virtues and, by holiness of heart, able to receive the divine indwelling, to which this same prophet has testified thus: "Your holy temple, wonderful in equity." Holiness, holiness, human self-control is a temple for God.
126.8CSEL 22:618–619
Domus ergo sedificanda per deum est. humanis enim operibus structa non permanet, nec doctrinis saeculi instituta consistit,, nec inani laboris et sollicitudinis nostrae cura custodietur. extruenda aliter est, custodienda aliter est: [non super terram] non super fluxam et dilabentem harenam initianda. sed fundamentum eius super prophetas et apostolos locandum est. lapidibus uiuis augenda est, angulari lapide continenda est et mutuae conexionis augmentis in uirum consummatum et in mensuram Christi corporis extruenda, specie quoque ac decore gratiarum spiritalium adornanda. haec ita a deo, id est doctrinis eius sedificanda non concidet. huius domus aedificationem nunc Israhel captiuus post plenitudinem gentium consequetur. haec domus in domos plures diuersis fidelium sedificationibus in unoquoque nostrum ad ornatum et amplitudinem beatae illius ciuitatis excrescit.
The house, then, must be built by God. For one constructed by human works does not endure, nor does one founded on the teachings of the world stand firm, nor will it be guarded by the empty care of our labor and anxiety. It is to be constructed otherwise, and guarded otherwise: it is not to be begun on flowing, slipping sand, but its foundation is to be laid on the prophets and apostles. It is to be enlarged with living stones, held together by the cornerstone, and built up by the growth of mutual joining into the perfect man and the measure of the body of Christ, and adorned also with the beauty and grace of spiritual gifts. Built thus by God, that is, by his teachings, it will not fall. The building of this house captive Israel will now attain after the fullness of the Gentiles. This house grows into many houses, through the various buildings of the faithful in each one of us, for the adornment and spaciousness of that blessed city.
126.9CSEL 22:619–620
Cuius ciuitatis iam diu dominus uigil custos est, cum Abraham peregrinum tuetur, cum immolandum Isaac reseruat, cum Iacob seruientem ditat, cum Aegypto Ioseph uenditum prseficit. cum Moysen aduersus Pharao confirmat, cum ducem bellis Iesum deligit, cum Dauid omnibus periculis liberat, cum Salomonem dono sapientiae muneratur, cum prophetis adest, cum Heliam rapit, cum Eliseum eligit, cum Danielum pascit, cum in camino pueros inrorat. cum tribus quartus adsistit, cum gignendo se ex uirgine Ioseph per angelum instruit, Mariam confirmat, Iohannem praemittit, apostolos eligit, patrem precatur dicens: pater sancte, serua eos; cum essem cum his, custodiebam eos in nomine tuo: cum denique ipse ille post passionem aeternae in nos custodise suse uigilias pollicetur dicens: ecce ego uobiscum sum omnibus diebus usque in consummationem saeculi. haec ciuitatis illius beatae atque sanctae aeterna custodia est, quse ex multis in unum conuenientibus et in unoquoque nostrum deo ciuitas est. est enim haec sancti corporis et fidelis animae ei placita possessio.
Of this city the Lord has long been the watchful guardian: when he protects Abraham the stranger, when he spares Isaac who was to be sacrificed, when he enriches Jacob in his service, when he sets Joseph, who had been sold, over Egypt, when he strengthens Moses against Pharaoh, when he chooses Joshua as leader in wars, when he frees David from all dangers, when he rewards Solomon with the gift of wisdom, when he stands by the prophets, when he catches up Elijah, when he chooses Elisha, when he feeds Daniel, when he bedews the youths in the furnace, when he stands as a fourth beside the three; when, in being born of the virgin, he instructs Joseph through an angel, strengthens Mary, sends John ahead, chooses the apostles, and prays to the Father, saying: "Holy Father, keep them; while I was with them, I kept them in your name"; when at last, after his passion, he promises the watches of his eternal guarding over us, saying: "Behold, I am with you all days, even to the consummation of the age." This is the eternal guard of that blessed and holy city, which, from many coming together into one and in each one of us, is a city for God. For this is the possession pleasing to him: a holy body and a faithful soul.
126.10CSEL 22:620
Quam autem per dominum sedificanda sit, ipse in euangeliis testatur dicens: amen dico uobis, non consummabitis ciuitates Israel, donec ueniat filius hominis. et huius quidem temporis et aedificationis beatus apostolus meminit dicens: cum autem intrauerit plenitudo gentium, tum quod relicum est Israhel saluabitur. hse igitur ciuitates, id est sancti cuiusque corporis atque animae deo placitus incolatus et coetus hunc unum habent perfectse huius habitationis artificem. aedificanda ergo per dominum haec ciuitas est, ut in augmentum consummationis suae crescat non enim iam sedificatio coepta perfectio est, sed per aedificationem perfectionis consummatio conparatur.
That it is to be built by the Lord, he himself testifies in the Gospels, saying: "Amen I say to you, you will not complete the cities of Israel until the Son of Man comes." And the blessed apostle recalls this time and this building, saying: "But when the fullness of the Gentiles has come in, then what remains of Israel will be saved." These cities, then, that is, the dwelling and fellowship of each holy body and soul pleasing to God, have this one craftsman of their perfected dwelling. This city, then, must be built by the Lord, so that it may grow toward the increase of its completion; for a building begun is not yet perfection, but through building the completion of perfection is attained.
126.11CSEL 22:620
Ceterum in aedificandis his domibus corporum et animarum ciuitatibus humanae artes uacant. inanes enim sunt omnes philosophorum uigiliae et otiosae sollicitudines. et frustratum in inuestigandis naturae secretis et perscrutandis mundi laboribus studium. sed lapsuram cito domum operatio talis aedificat. inanis quoque erit matutina eorum resurrectio. quae quamquam omnibus, quse in lucem uenerint, sit constituta corporibus, tamen ea, quae non fuerint aedificata per dominum, nequaquam eam, quae in domino ex mortuis resurgente iam coepta est, matutinae resurrectionis gloriam consequentur.
In building these houses of bodies and cities of souls, however, human arts are idle. For all the watches of the philosophers are empty, their anxieties idle, and their zeal in investigating the secrets of nature and searching out the labors of the world is frustrated. Such work builds a house that will soon fall. Empty too will be their morning resurrection. Although it has been appointed for all bodies that have come into the light, those that have not been built by the Lord will in no way attain the glory of the morning resurrection that has already begun in the Lord rising from the dead.
126.12CSEL 22:620–621
Ac ne aliquam psalmus opinionem intellegentiae in se terrenae et corporalis admitteret, perfectionis istius tempus et sedificandorum significationem ipso dictorum suorum ordine docet. nam humanis sedificationibus et terrenis custodiis et matutinis eorum surrectionibus inprobatis ait: surgite, postquam sederitis, qui manducatis panem doloris. cum dederit dilectis suis somnium, ecce hereditas domini fili, merces fructus uentris. nullus relictus est in his dictis ambigendi locus: intellegentise tantum fides necessaria est, rem enim uerba eloquuntur. nam prophetiae ueritatem gesta deinceps consummant, cognitionem uero gestorum doctrina euangelica atque apostolica subministrat. ciuitas ergo a deo est sedificanda, quae maneat; quia humana sedificatio infirma sit et caduca. ac ne lapides, caementa, ligna ciuitatem hanc esse existimaremus, quse hsec esset et quando esset perfecta ciuitas, docet dicens: surgite, postquam sederitis. sessio quiescentium requies est: a qua surgere iubentur, qui ad perfectam hanc ciuitatem sint conparandi.
And so that the psalm might admit no notion of an earthly and bodily understanding, it teaches by the very order of its words the time of this perfection and the meaning of the things to be built. For after rejecting human buildings, earthly guards, and their rising in the morning, it says: "Rise after you have sat, you who eat the bread of sorrow. When he has given sleep to his beloved, behold, the inheritance of the Lord are sons, the reward of the fruit of the womb." No room for doubt is left in these words: only the faith of understanding is needed, for the words speak the thing itself. Events afterward fulfil the truth of the prophecy, and the teaching of the Gospels and apostles supplies the knowledge of the events. The city, then, that is to remain must be built by God, since human building is weak and perishable. And lest we think this city is stones, mortar, and timber, it teaches what this city is and when the city will be perfect, saying: "Rise after you have sat." Sitting is the rest of those who are at rest; from it those are commanded to rise who are to be fitted for this perfect city.
126.13CSEL 22:621–622
Et qui tandem sunt isti, qui surgere, postquam sederint, iubentur? nempe qui manducatis panem doloris. panem doloris manducat, quisque se hominem in uitiis natum ac uiuere meminit. cum enim uoluntas nostra per dei metum et spem aeternorum ad perfecta innocentise opera contendat, et contra naturalis quaedam consuetudo uitiorum in ipsis illis, ex quibus emergere nitimur, demoretur, uitse dolorem per infirmitatem destitutae uoluntatis accipimus secundum dictum prophetae: qui adponit scientiam, adponit dolorem. cum enim ueritatis cognitio uoluntatem nostram ad profectum consequendse utilitatis instiget et naturae consuetudo uoluntatem scientem se proficere oportere detineat, profectus scientiae profectus doloris est: cum in tantum se per naturam doleat detineri, in quantum naturam sibi per cognitionem intellegat relinquendam. hinc ergo dolor uitae est, hinc panis doloris est. cuius uitse et doloris hic idem propheta meminit dicens: cibabis nos panem lacrimarum et potum dabis nobis lacrimarum in mensura. tendendum autem est semper, non etiam desinendum: neque idcirco ad perfectum non contendendum, quia doleamus id, quo tenditur, non posse contingi. sed in ipsa contendendi pertinacia dolendum est non contingere nos posse. quo tendimus. doloris huius dominus meminit dicens: beati lugentes, quoniam ipsi consolabuntur; beatitudinem consolationis ob luctum et dolorem non adeptae consummationis inpertiens.
And who, pray, are these who are commanded to rise after they have sat? Surely "you who eat the bread of sorrow." He eats the bread of sorrow who remembers that he is a man born in vices and living in them. For while our will, through fear of God and hope of eternal things, strives toward the perfect works of innocence, and on the other hand a kind of natural habit of vices holds us back in those very things from which we struggle to emerge, we receive the sorrow of life through the weakness of a will left helpless, according to the saying of the prophet: "He who adds knowledge adds sorrow." For since the knowledge of truth urges our will to advance toward gaining what is profitable, and the habit of nature holds back the will that knows it ought to advance, progress in knowledge is progress in sorrow: it grieves at being held back by nature in the same measure as it understands, through knowledge, that nature must be left behind. Hence, then, is the sorrow of life; hence is the bread of sorrow. This same prophet recalls this life and sorrow, saying: "You will feed us with the bread of tears, and give us tears to drink in measure." Yet we must always strive and never cease, nor must we fail to press toward perfection because we grieve that what we strive for cannot be reached; rather, in the very persistence of striving, we must grieve that we cannot reach what we strive for. The Lord recalls this sorrow, saying: "Blessed are those who mourn, for they shall be comforted," granting the blessedness of comfort on account of the mourning and sorrow over a completion not yet attained.
126.14CSEL 22:622–623
Propheticam autem uirtutem ipse ille dispositus in tempora uerborum ordo seruauit dicens: surgite, postquam sederitis. quorum alterum in prsesens est, id est surgite. ne fides tamquam de incertis et dubiis ambigeret, cum ueluti praesentem efficientiam ueritas propheticse admonitionis adferret et uiuis nobis fiduciam spei non cunctantis insereret. tempus autem huius, quod praesens est, mandati distulit in futurum in eo, quod ait: cum sederitis. in non ambigendis ergo mandatis praesentis est ueritas; in consequendis autem expectandi temporis dispensatio reseruatur.
The very order of the words, arranged in time, has kept the prophetic force, when it says: "Rise after you have sat." One of these is in the present, that is, "rise," so that faith might not hesitate as about uncertain and doubtful things, since the truth of the prophetic admonition brought, as it were, a present effect and instilled in us while still alive the confidence of an unhesitating hope. But the time of this command, which is present, he deferred to the future in saying: "when you have sat." In the commands, which are not to be doubted, lies the truth of the present; in the attaining of them, the dispensation of a time to be awaited is reserved.
126.15CSEL 22:623
Ut autem. quando sibi surgendum esset, cum sederint, sciant, temporis ipsius demonstrata est plenitudo: cum dederit, inquit, dilectis suis somnium. mortem sanctorum deus somnum frequentissime nuncupat, ut ad hunc eundem Dauid: cum obdormieris et requieueris cum patribus tuis, tunc excitabo de semine tuo, qui mihi erit in filium et cui ero in patrem; et dominus de Lazaro: Lazarus dormit; et apostolus de resurrecturis ait: quoniam nos, qui uiuimus, non prseueniemus eos, qui dormierunt. plenitudine itaque gentium in somnum mortis recepta et Israhel reliquo saluato tunc post hanc sessionem atque somnum resurrectionis est tempus. et quia dum temporum plenitudo concluditur, gentium quoque crediturarum secundum apostolum consummabitur plenitudo, idcirco ait: cum dederit dilectis suis somnium: hoc surgendi sedentium, quod et dandi dilectis somni tempus esse demonstrans, id est omni plenitudine iam recepta.
And so that they may know when they are to rise, once they have sat, the fullness of the time itself has been shown: "When he has given," it says, "sleep to his beloved." God very often calls the death of the saints sleep, as to David himself: "When you have fallen asleep and rested with your fathers, then I will raise up from your seed one who will be to me a son and to whom I will be a father"; and the Lord says of Lazarus: "Lazarus is sleeping"; and the apostle says of those who will rise: "For we who are alive will not go before those who have fallen asleep." So when the fullness of the Gentiles has been received into the sleep of death and the remnant of Israel has been saved, then after this sitting and sleep comes the time of resurrection. And since, while the fullness of the times is being concluded, the fullness of the Gentiles who are to believe will also, according to the apostle, be completed, he therefore says: "When he has given sleep to his beloved," showing that the time for those sitting to rise is also the time for giving sleep to the beloved, that is, when all the fullness has already been received.
126.16CSEL 22:623–624
Quid autem sint dormientes dilecti et resurrecturi sedentes, continuo cum quadam significatione rei praesentis ostendit dicens: ecce hereditas domini. sancti scilicet dormientes et resurrecturi sedentes hereditas domini est: non ille carnalis Iacob neque terrenus Israhel factus ex diuisione gentium portio et funiculum hereditatis secundum Moysen dicentem: cum diuisisset excelsus gentes secundum numerum angelorum dei, et facta est portio domini Iacob, funiculum hereditatis Israhel. et quia iam hic Israhel ob impietatem suam esse non meretur hereditas, quae hereditas esset, ostendit dicens: ecce hereditas domini fili, merces fructus uentris. ea ergo in filiis hereditas domini est, quam ex mercede fructus uentris acceperit. non enim inanis hic fructus est, quo ex uirginali uentre manens antea deus nascitur. nam merces eius hereditas est et hereditas filii sunt. quotquot, inquit, eum receperunt, dedit his potestatem filios dei fieri, et rursum: filioli. adhuc pusillum uobiscum sum. hi ergo filii hereditas est et haec hereditas merces fructus est uentris. est ergo dominus fructus uentris, quem ex se in uitae nostrae fructum pariens uirgo progenuit. et haec eius merces est, qui ex uirgine nascendo fructum uentris esse se uoluit, ut ei gentes, quas in filios per fidem generaret, hereditas sit.
What the sleeping beloved and the sitting who will rise are, he shows at once, with a certain indication of a present thing, saying: "Behold, the inheritance of the Lord." The saints, namely those sleeping and those sitting who will rise, are the inheritance of the Lord: not that carnal Jacob, nor the earthly Israel that became a portion and the measured lot of inheritance by the division of the nations, according to Moses, who says: "When the Most High divided the nations according to the number of the angels of God, and Jacob became the Lord's portion, Israel the measured lot of his inheritance." And since this Israel, because of its impiety, no longer deserves to be the inheritance, he shows what the inheritance is, saying: "Behold, the inheritance of the Lord are sons, the reward of the fruit of the womb." The Lord's inheritance, then, is in the sons, which he has received from the reward of the fruit of the womb. For this fruit is not empty, by which God, remaining what he was before, is born from a virgin's womb. For his reward is the inheritance, and the inheritance is the sons. "As many," it says, "as received him, to them he gave power to become sons of God"; and again: "Little children, yet a little while I am with you." These sons, then, are the inheritance, and this inheritance is the reward of the fruit of the womb. The Lord, then, is the fruit of the womb, whom the virgin brought forth, bearing him from herself as the fruit of our life. And this is his reward who willed, by being born of a virgin, to be the fruit of the womb: that the nations, which he would beget as sons through faith, should be his inheritance.
126.17CSEL 22:624–625
Quod autem, quia fructus uentris effectus sit, hanc mercedem hereditatis acceperit, psalmus alius testatur dicens: posce a me, et dabo tibi gentes hereditatem tuam et possessionem tuam terminos terrae; testatur et apostolus dicens: qui cum in forma dei esset, non rapinam arbitratus est esse se aequalem deo: sed se exinaniuit, formam serui accipiens, in similitudinem hominum factus et habitu repertus ut homo: humiliauit se factus oboediens usque ad mortem, mortem autem crucis; propter quod exaltauit illum deus et donauit illi nomen, quod est super omne nomen, ut in nomine Iesu omne genu flectat caelestium et terrestrium et infernorum, et omnes linguae confiteantur, quia dominus Iesus in gloria dei patris. haec ergo merces fructus uentris est, quae donatur in nomine, quae defertur in honore, quse praestatur in gloria. et hanc habet retributionem ab inmortali eius natura humanae infirmitatis suscepta natiuitas, ut, quia fructus uentris factus ipse est, merces quoque eius gentium fiat hereditas, et hereditas ipsa sint filii.
That he received this reward of the inheritance because he became the fruit of the womb, another psalm testifies, saying: "Ask of me, and I will give you the nations as your inheritance, and the ends of the earth as your possession"; and the apostle testifies, saying: "Who, though he was in the form of God, did not consider it robbery to be equal with God, but emptied himself, taking the form of a servant, made in the likeness of men and found in appearance as a man; he humbled himself, becoming obedient to death, even death on a cross. Therefore God exalted him and gave him the name that is above every name, that at the name of Jesus every knee should bend, of things in heaven and on earth and under the earth, and every tongue confess that the Lord Jesus is in the glory of God the Father." This, then, is the reward of the fruit of the womb, which is given in a name, conferred in honor, bestowed in glory. And the birth in human weakness, taken up by his immortal nature, has this recompense: that, because he himself became the fruit of the womb, his reward too should become the inheritance of the nations, and the inheritance itself should be the sons.
126.18CSEL 22:625–626
Dehinc sequuitur: sicut sagittae in manu potentis, ita filii ii excussorum. sagittarum hic usus est, ut emissae celeri uolatu ferantur et ad destinata quaeque indeflexa linea dirigantur. esse autem sagittas, quibus dominus utatur, ita legimus, cum ait: misit sagittas suas et dissipauit eos. in Esaia quoque ita scriptum est, quod etiam de ipso domino dictum forte esse potest intellegi: et posuit me tamquam sagittam electam et pharetra sua abscondit me et ait mihi: magnum tibi est hoc uocari puerum meum. sunt ergo istius modi dei sagittae uolatu citae, ictu fideles: quas, quantum spiritalis ratio demonstrat, significari doctrinas propheticas atque apostolicas, in quibus dei uerbum est, oportet intellegi, ubique missas, conpungentes, arguentes, uolantes.
Then follows: "As arrows in the hand of the mighty, so are the sons of the shaken off." The use of arrows is this: that once loosed they are carried in swift flight and directed in an unswerving line to whatever target is set. That there are arrows the Lord uses, we read thus, when it says: "He sent his arrows and scattered them." In Isaiah too it is written thus, which perhaps may also be understood as said of the Lord himself: "And he made me like a chosen arrow and hid me in his quiver, and said to me: It is a great thing for you to be called my servant." Such, then, are God's arrows, swift in flight, faithful in striking: by which, as spiritual reasoning shows, we must understand to be meant the prophetic and apostolic teachings in which the word of God is, sent everywhere, piercing, convicting, flying.
126.19CSEL 22:626
Quamquam in plurimis locis meminerimus esse et mortiferas et letales sagittas, de quibus scribitur: sagittas suas arsuris operatus est, uerum hic non de ultricibus sagittis dici aliquid intellegi potest: quia nunc sicut sagittse in manu potentis, ita filii excussorum. Pharao in mari rubro in interitum ob crimen impietatis excussus est. excussum quoque apostolicis pedibus puluerem scimus sententiam esse maledicti. et quia siue prophetae ipsi, qui excussorum, id est peccatorum et maledictorum filii, tamquam uolantes et fideles sagittae doctrinae caelestis emissi sunt, uel apostoli ecclesiarumque doctores de excussis per impietatem suam in maledictum gentibus crediderunt, idcirco ait: tamquam sagittae in manu potentis, ita filii excussorum; orbem terrae uolatu peragrantes, infidelia corda doctrinae telo uulnerantes et peccatorum omnium incentiua salutari iaculo pungentes.
Although we recall that in very many places there are also deadly and lethal arrows, of which it is written: "He has made his arrows for those who will burn," yet here nothing can be understood as said of avenging arrows, since it now says: "As arrows in the hand of the mighty, so are the sons of the shaken off." Pharaoh was shaken off into destruction in the Red Sea for the crime of impiety. We know too that the dust shaken off the apostles' feet is a sentence of curse. And since either the prophets themselves, who were sons of the shaken off, that is, of sinners and the cursed, were sent like flying and faithful arrows of heavenly teaching, or the apostles and teachers of the churches believed from among the nations shaken off into the curse through their impiety, he therefore says: "As arrows in the hand of the mighty, so are the sons of the shaken off": traversing the world in their flight, wounding unbelieving hearts with the dart of teaching, and piercing the incitements of all sins with a saving shaft.
126.20CSEL 22:626–627
Atque ut id ex his dictum intellegi posset, quos deus de excussorum filiis ad doctrinam salutis modo emitteret sagittarum. id consecutum in dictis est: beatus uir, qui inplebit desiderium suum ex ipsis; non confundentur, cum loquentur inimicis suis in porta. beatus ergo ille est. qui ex ipsis desiderium suum potuerit inplere, id est uel de sagittis uel de filiis excussorum, desiderabilibus se scilicet doctrinae uerbis replere et de praedicatis fructibus futurorum bonorum expectatisque satiare. atque ut hos ex dei doctrina sedificatores esse illius, quam superius memorauit, ciuitatis ostenderet, idcirco ita clausit: ex ipsis non confundentur, cum loquentur inimicis suis in porta. quod ex ipsis siue ad beatum uirum pertinet, qui desiderium suum inplebit ex ipsis, uel ipsis filiis excussorum erit proprium, qui ex ipsis non confundantur, cum in porta inimicis suis loquantur.
And so that this might be understood as said of those whom God would now send forth from the sons of the shaken off, after the manner of arrows, for the teaching of salvation, there follows in the words: "Blessed the man who will fill his desire from them; they will not be put to shame when they speak to their enemies in the gate." Blessed, then, is he who has been able to fill his desire from them, that is, either from the arrows or from the sons of the shaken off: to fill himself, namely, with the desirable words of teaching and to be satisfied with the proclaimed and awaited fruits of good things to come. And to show that these, by God's teaching, are the builders of that city he mentioned above, he therefore concluded thus: "From them they will not be put to shame when they speak to their enemies in the gate." This "from them" either belongs to the blessed man who will fill his desire from them, or will be proper to the sons of the shaken off themselves, who from them are not put to shame when they speak to their enemies in the gate.
126.21CSEL 22:627–628
Neque ambiguum est, quid in porta loquentur sedificatse per prsedicationem suam a domino ciuitatis. meminimus autem in psalmo altero dictum: qui exaltas me de portis mortis, ut adnuntiem omnes laudes tuas in portis filiae Sion. et hic quidem plures portae sunt, in quibus propheta a mortis portis exaltatus omnes laudes dei prsedicat; sed scimus esse portam unam regiam, dominicam, caelestem, de qua dictum est: hsec est porta domini, iusti intrabunt in eam. et cum non confundentur hi excussorum filii in porta inimicis suis loquentes, necesse est, ut his inimicis suis loquentes non confundantur, qui cum iustis non merebuntur intrare; exprobrantes illis impietatem in deum, inoboedientiam in praedicantes, infidelitatem in aeterna promissa, odia in innocentes et in ipsa ecclesiae membra saeuitiam, ipsi confidentes et nulla fidei suae ac religionis ambiguitate trepidantes, sed hos inimicos suos ab eius aditu ingressuque prohibentes, qui ait: nemo uadit ad patrem nisi per me, dominus noster Iesus Christus, qui est benedictus in saecula saeculorum. amen.
Nor is there any doubt what those will speak in the gate of the city built by the Lord through their preaching. We remember that it is said in another psalm: "You who lift me up from the gates of death, that I may proclaim all your praises in the gates of the daughter of Zion." And here indeed there are many gates, in which the prophet, lifted up from the gates of death, proclaims all the praises of God; but we know there is one royal, lordly, heavenly gate, of which it is said: "This is the gate of the Lord; the righteous shall enter by it." And since these sons of the shaken off will not be put to shame speaking to their enemies in the gate, they must, in speaking to their enemies, who will not be counted worthy to enter with the righteous, not be put to shame: reproaching them for their impiety toward God, their disobedience toward those who preach, their unbelief toward the eternal promises, their hatred of the innocent and their savagery against the very members of the church; themselves confident and trembling at no doubt about their faith and religion, but keeping these enemies of theirs from the approach and entrance of him who says: "No one goes to the Father except through me," our Lord Jesus Christ, who is blessed for ever and ever. Amen.
Tractates 127
127.1CSEL 22:628–629
Quotiensque de timore domini in scripturis est sermo. animaduertendum est numquam eum solitarium relinqui. tamquam sufficientem nobis ad consummationem fidei, sed subici multa aut ante ferri, ex quibus timoris domini ratio et perfectio intellegatur; ut cognoscimus ex eo, quod per Salomonem in Paroemiis dictum est: si enim sapientiam inuoces et intellectui des uocem tuam et exquiras eam tamquam argentum et tamquam thensauros inuestiges eam, tunc intelleges timorem domini. uidemus enim, quantis usque ad timorem domini gradibus peruentum est. ante enim inuocanda sapientia est et omne legendi officium intellectui est deputandum et exquirenda ac peruestiganda est sapientia: et tunc timor domini intellegendus. et quantum ad communem humanae opinionis pertinet sensum, non ita de timore sentitur. timor est enim humanae inbecillitatis trepidatio metuentis id perpeti, quod sibi nolit accidere. existit autem et commouetur in nobis de reatus conscientia, de iure potioris, de impetu fortioris, de aegritudinis causa, de ferse occursu et de omnis mali passione. hic ergo timor non docetur, sed ex natura infirmitatis occurrit. neque quid timendum sit discimus, sed terrorem suum ipsa illa nobis iniciunt, quse timentur.
Whenever the fear of the Lord is spoken of in the Scriptures, we must note that it is never left on its own, as if it sufficed us for the completion of faith, but that many things are added after it or set before it, from which the meaning and the perfection of the fear of the Lord may be understood. So we learn from what is said through Solomon in Proverbs: "For if you call upon wisdom and give your voice to understanding, and seek her like silver and search for her like treasures, then you will understand the fear of the Lord." We see by how many steps one arrives at the fear of the Lord. First wisdom must be called upon, the whole task of reading must be devoted to understanding, and wisdom must be sought and searched out; and then the fear of the Lord is to be understood. Yet, so far as the common sense of human opinion goes, fear is not thought of in this way. For fear is the trembling of human weakness, dreading to suffer what it would not wish to befall it. It arises and is stirred in us from consciousness of guilt, from the right of one more powerful, from the assault of one stronger, from the cause of sickness, from meeting a wild beast, and from the suffering of every evil. This fear, then, is not taught but arises from the nature of weakness. Nor do we learn what is to be feared; rather, the very things that are feared cast their terror upon us.
127.2CSEL 22:629–630
At uero de timore domini ita scriptum est: uenite, filii, audite me, timorem domini docebo uos. discendus ergo dei timor est, quia docetur. non enim in terrore, sed in ratione doctrinae est; neque ex trepidatione naturae est. sed praeceptorum obseruantia et operibus uitse innocentis et cognitione ueritatis ineundus est. nam si idcirco deus timendus est, quia plura fulminibus arserint, tonitru prostrata sint, terrae nunc motu conciderint, nunc hiatu recepta sint, nullus fidei timor est, qui ex timore accidentium commouetur. nobis autem timor dei omnis in amore est, metumque eius dilectio perfecta consummat. dilectionis autem nostrae in eum hoc proprium officium est, parere monitis, statutis obtemperare, pollicitis fidere. audiamus ergo scripturam dicentem: et nunc, Israhel, quid dominus deus tuus poscit a te, nisi ut timeas dominum deum tuum et ambules in omnibus uiis eius et diligas eum et custodias praecepta eius ex toto corde tuo et ex tota anima tua, ut bene sit tibi? quibus dictis conuenientia et congrua propheta in exordio psalmi locutus est dicens: beati omnes, qui timent dominum, qui ambulant in uiis eius: ostendens non ex trepidatione nostra, quia haec timoris est auctor in ceteris, neque ex terrore eius, qui terribilis sit. beatos esse, qui timeant, sed ex eo, quod in uiis domini incedant. timor enim, ut diximus, non in metu, sed in oboedientia est: et timoris testimonium est obsequella. ceterum, si quis timeat neque pareat, erit quidem timens ex trepidatione naturae, sed non erit beatus ex timoris officiis.
But of the fear of the Lord it is written thus: "Come, sons, hear me; I will teach you the fear of the Lord." The fear of God, then, must be learned, because it is taught. For it lies not in terror but in the reasoning of teaching; nor does it come from the trembling of nature, but is to be entered upon by keeping the commandments, by the works of an innocent life, and by knowledge of the truth. For if God is to be feared because many things have been burned by thunderbolts, laid low by thunder, now fallen in an earthquake, now swallowed in a chasm, the fear that is stirred by fear of what befalls is no fear of faith. For us, however, all the fear of God lies in love, and perfect love completes the fear of him. And this is the proper duty of our love toward him: to obey his admonitions, to comply with his statutes, to trust his promises. Let us hear, then, the Scripture saying: "And now, Israel, what does the Lord your God ask of you, but that you fear the Lord your God and walk in all his ways and love him and keep his commandments with all your heart and with all your soul, that it may be well with you?" In keeping and agreement with these words the prophet spoke at the beginning of the psalm, saying: "Blessed are all who fear the Lord, who walk in his ways": showing that those who fear are blessed not from our trembling, since that is what causes fear in other matters, nor from the terror of him who is terrible, but from the fact that they walk in the ways of the Lord. For fear, as we have said, lies not in dread but in obedience, and compliance is the proof of fear. But if anyone fears and does not obey, he will indeed be fearful from the trembling of nature, but he will not be blessed from the duties of fear.
127.3CSEL 22:630
Multae autem sunt uiae domini, cum ipse tamen uia sit. sed cum de se loquitur, uiam ipse se nuncupat et rationem, cur se uiam nuncupasset, ostendit dicens: nemo enim potest ad patrem uenire nisi per me. uerum cum de prophetis ac scriptis eorum, quibus ad Christum pergitur, sermo est, tunc uise plures sunt in unam uiam undique congruentes; quod utrumque eodem per Hieremiam prophetam loco significatum est dicentem: state in uiis domini et interrogate semitas dei seternales et uidete, quae est uia bona. et ambulate in ea. multse itaque uise interrogandae sunt et in multis insistendum est, ut unam, quae bona est, inueniamus per multorum scilicet doctrinam unam uiam uitse seternse reperturi. uise enim in lege, uise in prophetis, uise in euangeliis, uiae in apostolis sunt, uiae quoque in diuersis prseceptorum operibus sunt, in quibus per timorem dei ambulantes beati sunt, quibus dicitur:
The ways of the Lord are many, though he himself is the Way. When he speaks of himself, he calls himself the Way and shows the reason why he called himself the Way, saying: "For no one can come to the Father except through me." But when the prophets and their writings, by which one proceeds to Christ, are spoken of, then there are many ways, converging from every side into one way. Both of these are signified in the same passage through the prophet Jeremiah, who says: "Stand in the ways of the Lord, and ask for the eternal paths of God, and see which is the good way, and walk in it." Many ways, then, must be asked about, and we must press on in many, so that we may find the one that is good, namely, that through the teaching of many we may discover the one way of eternal life. For there are ways in the Law, ways in the Prophets, ways in the Gospels, ways in the apostles; there are ways too in the various works of the commandments, walking in which through the fear of God they are blessed to whom it is said:
127.4CSEL 22:630–631
Labores fructuum tuorum manducabis. sermo ad plures coeptus ad unum refertur, docens nos omnes, qui in Christo credidimus, unum esse apostolo ita confirmante: omnes enim uos unum estis in Christo Iesu; siue ergo ad unum siue ad plures loquitur, in uno id erit significantise, quod in pluribus.
"You shall eat the labors of your fruits." Speech begun to many is turned to one, teaching us that all of us who have believed in Christ are one, as the apostle confirms: "For you are all one in Christ Jesus." Whether, then, he speaks to one or to many, there will be the same meaning in the one as in the many.
127.5CSEL 22:631
Est autem contuendum propheticum hunc sermonem ab usu communis opinionis discrepare. in hac enim uitae conformatione, qui manducant, laborum suorum fructus manducant ex prouentibus elaborati operis sumentes. at uero propheta ait labores fructuum manducandos. non consequitur sensus humanus dicti huius intellegentiam, ex laboribus enim fructus est, non ex fructibus labor. deinde labor ministerium corporis est, fructus uero merces laboris. ministerium autem corporis incorporale est; nihil uero edere, nisi quod corporale est, possumus.
We must observe, however, that this prophetic saying departs from the usage of common opinion. For in this arrangement of life, those who eat eat the fruits of their labors, taking them from the yields of work performed. But the prophet says that the labors of fruits are to be eaten. Human sense does not reach the understanding of this saying, for fruit comes from labors, not labor from fruits. Then, labor is a service of the body, while fruit is the reward of labor. But the service of the body is incorporeal, and we can eat nothing but what is bodily.
127.6CSEL 22:631–632
Sed propheta nihil de terrenis et prsesentibus tractat: de beatitudine enim timentium dominum et in uia eius ambulantium ei sermo est qui enim in uiis domini ambulant, illi labores fructuum suorum manducabunt. non enim hic manducatio corporis est, quia neque id, quod manducandum est, corporale est. sed habemus hic cibum spiritalem, animam nostram in uitam alentem, bona scilicet opera bonitatis, castitatis, misericordise, patientiae, tranquillitatis, in quibus nobis contra corporum nostrorum uitia laborandum est. horum laborum fructus in seternitate est: sed labor hic aeternorum fructuum ante comedendus est eoque in uita hac corporali anima nostra alenda est, per cibum horum laborum obtinentes panem uiuum. panem caelestem ab eo, qui dixit: ego sum panis uiuus de caelo: quem qui indignus secundum mandatum apostoli acceperit, iudicium sibi adquirit. hi sunt ergo labores fructuum manducandi, eorum scilicet fructuum, qui in caelis metentur. nunc, dum in terra sumus, opera sumenda sunt. hsec enim nunc animam saturant, haec in cselum suis fructibus prosequentur. denique sequenti uersu utriusque huius temporis. beatitudinem propheta demonstrat dicens: beatus es, et bene tibi erit. quorum alterum in praesens obtinetur, quod beatus es; quod uero bene tibi erit, repositum est in futurum, quia interim labor futurorum fructuum manducetur.
But the prophet treats nothing earthly and present: his speech is about the blessedness of those who fear the Lord and walk in his way. For those who walk in the ways of the Lord will eat the labors of their fruits. This is not eating with the body, since what is to be eaten is not bodily either. Rather, we have here a spiritual food, nourishing our soul for life: the good works, namely, of kindness, chastity, mercy, patience, and calm, in which we must labor against the vices of our bodies. The fruit of these labors is in eternity; but the labor of eternal fruits must be eaten beforehand, and our soul must be nourished by it in this bodily life, as through the food of these labors we obtain the living bread, the heavenly bread, from him who said: "I am the living bread from heaven," which whoever receives unworthily, according to the apostle's command, brings judgment on himself. These, then, are the labors of fruits to be eaten, of those fruits, namely, which will be reaped in heaven. Now, while we are on earth, the works must be taken as food; for these now satisfy the soul, and these will follow into heaven with their fruits. Finally, in the following verse the prophet shows the blessedness of both these times, saying: "Blessed are you, and it will be well with you." Of these, the one is obtained in the present, that you are blessed; but that it will be well with you is laid up for the future, since in the meantime the labor of future fruits is eaten.
127.7CSEL 22:632–633
Uxor tua sicut uitis abundans in lateribus domus tuae. fili tui sicut nouella oliuarum in circuitu mensae tuse. ecce sic benedicetur omnis homo, qui timet dominum. multis forte sermo iste in praesentis benedictionis gaudium aptus uidebitur, ut ex misericordia dei suppetat pacificse et utilis in domo coniugis salus. et dulcissimus circum conuiuium coetus filiorum. sed si hsec perfecte bona fuissent, quae, cum sint bona, non tamen cselestia bona sunt, tamen, si in his beatitudo timoris dei constitisset. obtinuisset utique princeps fidei et timoris dei Abraham, cui uxor diu sterilis bis abrepta est, filius ex promissione unus offerri in hostiam iussus et sacrificio admotus intulit orbitatis dolorem. ipsi deinde Isaac filii duo dissidentes et usque ad odium mortis inimici. Iacob autem ignoratae uxoris inopinatus maritus et ad nuptias alias falso coactus et uiuentis filii funus parricidali fratrum mendacio plangens caruit timentium deum benedictionibus? et apud quos et a quibus fides est, apud eos fidei sanctificatio non reperietur? quantos autem peccatorum uidemus florere domo, coniuge, liberis! iam uero benedictionibus dei priuabitur felix illa et beata uirginitas, causam sibi beatitudinis non relinquens, et ubi illud erit Pauli: uellem autem omnes homines esse sicuti et me? et nescio, quomodo propheta perfectam eam beatitudinem constituerit, quse negata sanctis est, peccatoribus usitata est, non speranda uirginibus sit.
"Your wife like a fruitful vine on the sides of your house; your sons like young olive shoots around your table. Behold, thus shall every man be blessed who fears the Lord." To many, perhaps, this saying will seem suited to the joy of a present blessing: that by God's mercy there may be in the home the peaceable and useful wellbeing of a wife, and a most sweet company of sons around the feast. But if these things had been perfectly good, which, though they are goods, are not heavenly goods, and if the blessedness of the fear of God had consisted in them, then surely Abraham, the chief of faith and of the fear of God, would have obtained it, whose long-barren wife was twice carried off, and whose one son by promise, commanded to be offered as a victim and brought to the sacrifice, brought on him the grief of bereavement. Then Isaac's own two sons were at odds and enemies even to the hatred of death. And did Jacob, the unwitting husband of a wife he did not know, forced by deceit into another marriage, and mourning the funeral of a living son through the murderous lie of his brothers, lack the blessings of those who fear God? And among those with whom and from whom faith comes, will the sanctification of faith not be found? Yet how many sinners we see flourishing in house, wife, and children! And will that happy and blessed virginity be deprived of God's blessings, leaving itself no ground of blessedness? And where will that saying of Paul be: "But I would that all men were even as I myself"? I do not know how the prophet could have established as perfect a blessedness that was denied to the saints, is common among sinners, and is not to be hoped for by virgins.
127.8CSEL 22:633–634
Ergo quia secundum humanam intellegentiam propriam et perfectam beatitudinem dicti huius sermo non explicat. erigendae sunt ad spiritalem doctrinam mentes atque aures. lex enim omnis secundum apostolum spiritalis est, et ipse non humilem nec terrenam beatitudinis spem secutus est dicens: benedictus pater domini nostri Iesu Christi, qui benedixit nos in omni benedictione spiritali in cselestibus. cum itaque in spiritalibus et caelestibus benedici se ostendat, perfecta illa sanctorum beatitudo non in his terrenis et corporeis esse speranda est; sed potius intellegendum est, per corporalium et terrenorum nuncupationem caelestium bonorum esse intellegentiam consequendam. numquid cum dominus secundum euangelia sponsus est et secundum Iohannem habet sponsam, de sponsis terrenis et corporalibus significari existimandum est? non utique: sed per hanc sermonis consuetudinem docemur eum esse, qui promissus sit gentibus cuique a patre ecclesiae hereditas per adoptionem corporis, quod ex uirgine praesumpturus esset, desponsa sit.
Since, then, according to human understanding, the wording of this saying does not set out a proper and perfect blessedness, minds and ears must be raised to spiritual teaching. For according to the apostle the whole Law is spiritual, and he himself did not pursue a lowly or earthly hope of blessedness, saying: "Blessed be the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places." Since, then, he shows that he is blessed in spiritual and heavenly things, that perfect blessedness of the saints is not to be hoped for in these earthly and bodily things; rather, it must be understood that through the naming of bodily and earthly things the understanding of heavenly goods is to be attained. When, according to the Gospels, the Lord is the bridegroom, and according to John has the bride, are we to think that earthly and bodily brides are meant? Certainly not: but by this manner of speaking we are taught that he is the one who was promised to the nations, and to whom the church was betrothed by the Father as an inheritance through the adoption of the body he would take from the virgin.
127.9CSEL 22:634–635
Ut autem nunc cognoscamus, quid sub uxoris nuncupatione intellegi oporteat, contuendum est, quid et alibi sub hoc eodem uxoris nomine tractetur. Salomon itaque ait: qusesiui sapientiam sponsam adducere mihi ipsi. et quia, qui sponsam requirit, diuitem quaerit, huius sponsse suse opes memorat dicens: honestatem glorificat conuictum dei habens, et omnium dominus dilexit eam; — et si multam quis cognitionem desiderat, nouit et quae a principio sint, et quae futura sunt conspicit et iterum: uxorem uirilem quis inueniet? pretiosior est autem lapidibus pretiosis istius modi. et haec in Prouerbiis dicta sunt, quia prouerbia non hoc, quod uerbis sonat, explicant, sed dictorum uirtutem ex usu uerborum communium nuntiant. docet autem dominus in euangeliis, quid prouerbia intellegenda sint, dicens: ueniet hora, ut iam non in prouerbiis loquar uobis sed palam de patre adnuntiem uobis. ergo secundum prouerbiorum rationem uxorem uirilem nosse debemus, eam nempe, quam sibi Salomon sponsam optauit adsumere, de qua et rursum ait: iudicaui igitur hanc adducere ad conuiuendum mecum et amator factus sum pulchritudinis eius. haec igitur tamquam uxor adsumpta sapientia uirilis est, perficiens omnia et sibi subdens et in labore utilium operum ualida. ipsa deo placita et per doctrinam eius digna et praeteritorum scientia et futurorum cognitione perfecta.
So that we may now learn what is to be understood under the name of wife, we must consider what is treated elsewhere under this same name of wife. Solomon says: "I sought to bring wisdom home as a bride for myself." And since one who seeks a bride seeks a rich one, he recalls the riches of this bride of his, saying: "She glorifies her nobility by having the companionship of God, and the Lord of all loved her"; and: "If anyone desires much knowledge, she knows what is from the beginning and sees what is to come"; and again: "Who will find a manly wife? She is more precious than precious stones of this kind." And these things are said in Proverbs, because proverbs do not set out what they sound like in words, but announce the force of the sayings through the use of common words. The Lord teaches in the Gospels how proverbs are to be understood, saying: "The hour will come when I will no longer speak to you in proverbs, but will tell you plainly of the Father." According to the manner of proverbs, then, we ought to recognize the manly wife: namely, the one whom Solomon desired to take as his bride, of whom he also says again: "I resolved, therefore, to bring her to live with me, and I became a lover of her beauty." This wisdom, then, taken as a wife, is manly, accomplishing all things and subduing them to herself, strong in the labor of useful works, pleasing to God, worthy through his teaching, and perfect in knowledge of the past and understanding of the future.
127.10CSEL 22:635–636
Hsec timentis deum uxor totis domus suas lateribus diffusa fecundae uitis modo se per omnia operum nostrorum latera extendit. domum autem non ambigitur hoc animae nostrae esse domicilium, quod sibi unusquisque per timorem dei et uias eius ineundo ad habitationem sapientiae emundat. ex hac igitur filii qui erunt, tamquam nouella oliuarum in circuitu mensae nostrae erunt. non in conuiuii circuitu futuros ait esse, sed mensse. mensa enim domini est, ex qua cibum sumimus, panis scilicet uiui, cuius hsec uirtus est, ut ipse uiuens eos quoque, qui se accipiant, uiuificet. est et mensa lectionum dominicarum, in qua spiritalis doctrinae cibo alimur, sed de qua in psalmo alio scriptum est: fiat mensa eorum coram ipsis in laqueum et in captionem et in retributionem et in scandalum; qui doctrinam dei consectantur, nisi in operum bonorum ministerio uersentur, mensae illius cibo non proficient; in captionem enim illis et scandalum omnis intellectae ipsius prophetiae lectio proficit. nam sicut ex coniuge liberi, ita ex sapientia bonae uoluntatis opera procreantur. haec igitur tamquam nouella oliuarum mensam nostram circumibunt, id est doctrinae nostrae cognitionem optimorum quasi ramorum fructibus obumbrabunt. seruauit autem etiam hanc propheta rationem, ut neophytam oliuam diceret. id est nuper plantatam: quia per sapientiam, tamquam per coniugem adsumptam, cuius filii sunt opera fidelia, haec eadem in hac terra nostri corporis plantantur. haec igitur uxor est modo uitis abundantis in domus nostrae lateribus diffusa: hi filii, id est ex tali coniuge opera procreata, tamquam plantate oliuae in mensae nostrae circuitu adsistent. et quia haec timentium deum beatitudo est, propheta subiecit: ecce sic benedicetur omnis homo, qui timet dominum.
This wife of one who fears God, spread over all the sides of his house, extends herself, like a fruitful vine, over all the sides of our works. There is no doubt that the house is this dwelling of our soul, which each one cleanses for himself as a habitation for wisdom by the fear of God and by entering upon his ways. The sons who will come from her, then, will be like young olive shoots around our table. He does not say they will be around the feast, but around the table. For it is the table of the Lord, from which we take food, namely the living bread, whose power is this: that, being itself alive, it gives life also to those who receive it. There is also the table of the Lord's readings, at which we are nourished with the food of spiritual teaching; but of it it is written in another psalm: "Let their table become before them a snare, and a trap, and a retribution, and a stumbling block." Those who pursue the teaching of God will not profit from the food of that table unless they are engaged in the service of good works; for to them every reading of the prophecy itself, once understood, turns into a trap and a stumbling block. For as children are begotten of a wife, so the works of good will are begotten of wisdom. These, then, like young olive shoots, will surround our table, that is, they will shade the knowledge of our teaching with the fruits, as it were, of the finest branches. The prophet also kept this reasoning in calling it a neophyte olive, that is, newly planted: because through wisdom, taken as a wife, whose sons are faithful works, these same works are planted in this earth of our body. This, then, is the wife, spread like an abundant vine on the sides of our house; these are the sons, that is, the works begotten of such a wife, who will stand like planted olives around our table. And since this is the blessedness of those who fear God, the prophet added: "Behold, thus shall every man be blessed who fears the Lord."
127.11CSEL 22:636–637
Iungitur ad timentis meritum etiam uotum prophetse dicentis: benedicat te dominus ex Sion; et uideas. quse sunt bona Hierusalem. de Hierusalem et Sion iam in superioribus psalmis frequenter sumus locuti: ex quibus uel in quibus bonorum omnium consummatio speranda est. nunc enim quamuis bonis cselestibus perfruamur, tamen maiora nobis in Sion et Hierusalem temporibus reseruantur. hoc enim sseculum promissorum bonorum capax non est. uae enim nunc mundo a scandalis, in quo et zizaniam diabolus superserit, in quo regio est corruptionis et locus iniquitatis et conuallis plorationis, in quo mundipotentes sunt harum tenebrarum. sed habemus interim promissorum nobis bonorum lumen. in quo tamquam per speculum et in senigmate felicium rerum imaginem contuemur; tunc facie ad faciem uisuri, non interposita obscuritatis nube aut speculi aemulantis splendore, sed uera et conspicabili beatitudinis nostrae contemplatione laetabimur operum nostrorum fructus contuentes et mercedem uitse innocentis uidentes. nam ut opera ex sapientia gignuntur, ita ex operibus retributio nascitur. est ergo sapientia innocentiae mater, et rursum innocentia fructus retributionis parit. hos ergo consequemur diabolo contrito, aculeo mortis retuso et omni principe ac potestate huius saeculi exempto, cum iam pax in nobis sit hoste uicto et perempto; quod propheta psalmi ipsius conclusione testatur dicens: benedicat te dominus ex Sion; et uideas bona Hierusalem omnibus diebus uitae tuae et uideas filios filiorum tuorum: pax super Israhel speremus ergo haec bona Hierusalem caelestis et Sion montis et pacis Israhel, quia locus domini in pace est. in domino nostro Iesu Christo, qui est benedictus in saecula. saeculorum. amen..
To the merit of the one who fears is joined also the prayer of the prophet, who says: "May the Lord bless you from Zion, and may you see the good things of Jerusalem." Of Jerusalem and Zion we have often spoken already in the earlier psalms: from which, or in which, the completion of all good things is to be hoped for. For now, although we enjoy heavenly goods, yet greater ones are reserved for us in the times of Zion and Jerusalem. This age cannot hold the promised goods. For "woe now to the world because of stumbling blocks"; in it the devil has also sown tares over the wheat; in it is the region of corruption, the place of iniquity, and the valley of weeping; in it are the world-rulers of this darkness. But meanwhile we have the light of the goods promised us, in which we behold the image of blessed things as through a mirror and in a riddle; then we shall see face to face, with no cloud of obscurity in between and no imitating brightness of a mirror, but we shall rejoice in the true and visible contemplation of our blessedness, beholding the fruits of our works and seeing the reward of an innocent life. For as works are begotten of wisdom, so recompense is born of works. Wisdom, then, is the mother of innocence, and innocence in turn bears the fruits of recompense. These we shall obtain when the devil has been crushed, the sting of death blunted, and every ruler and power of this age removed, when peace is in us at last, the enemy defeated and destroyed. This the prophet testifies at the conclusion of the psalm itself, saying: "May the Lord bless you from Zion, and may you see the good things of Jerusalem all the days of your life, and may you see your children's children: peace upon Israel." Let us hope, then, for these good things of the heavenly Jerusalem, of Mount Zion, and of the peace of Israel, because the place of the Lord is in peace, in our Lord Jesus Christ, who is blessed for ever and ever. Amen.
Tractates 128
128.1CSEL 22:637–638
Instituimur dictis propheticis ad tolerantiam praesentium passionum, et naturae nostrae infirmitas aduersus saeculi iniurias semper inpatiens suscipit patientiae doctrinam ab eo, qui in praesenti psalmo ait: saepe inpugnauerunt me a iuuentute mea. non otiosa aetas religiosi uiri est neque quietam exigit uitam. inpugnatur iam ab ipsis iuuentutis suae annis et inpugnatur saepe. non nouella itaque neque rara inpugnantium odia sunt, sed ea saepe etiam ab ipsis initiis aetatis infesta sunt. et idcirco haec sunt, quae fidem probant, quae patientiam testantur, quae inuictse uirtutis coronam merentur. nouit beatus apostolus Paulus hanc longi praelii coronam dicens: nemo coronatur, nisi qui legitime certauerit. certamen tantum non sufficit ad coronam: legitime certandum est. id est omnia passionum bella peragenda sunt; non sufficit semel neque unius certaminis bello militasse. et audiamus hunc ipsum legitime certantem, cum dicit de se: in laboribus copiosius, in plagis abundantius, in custodiis eminentius, in mortibus frequenter: a Iudaeis quinquies quadraginta una minus accepi, ter uirgis caesus sum, semel lapidatus sum, ter naufragaui, noctem et diem in profundo feci. merito iste tot et tantis proeliis perfunctus dicere ausus est: de cetero iam superest mihi corona iustitiae, quia nemo, nisi qui legitime certauerit, coronatur.
We are trained by the prophetic sayings to bear present sufferings, and the weakness of our nature, always impatient against the injuries of the world, receives the teaching of patience from him who says in the present psalm: "Often have they fought against me from my youth." The life of a religious man is not idle, nor does it lead a quiet life. He is fought against from the very years of his youth, and fought against often. The hatreds of those who fight against him are neither new nor rare, but often hostile even from the very beginnings of life. And therefore these are the things that prove faith, that attest patience, that earn the crown of unconquered virtue. The blessed apostle Paul knew this crown of a long battle, saying: "No one is crowned unless he has competed lawfully." The contest alone is not enough for the crown: one must compete lawfully, that is, carry through all the wars of suffering; it is not enough to have fought once, or in the war of a single contest. Let us hear this man himself competing lawfully, when he says of himself: "In labors more abundantly, in stripes beyond measure, in prisons more often, in deaths often; from the Jews five times I received forty lashes less one, three times I was beaten with rods, once I was stoned, three times I was shipwrecked, a night and a day I spent in the deep." Rightly did he, having gone through so many and such great battles, dare to say: "For the rest, there remains for me the crown of righteousness," since no one is crowned except one who has competed lawfully.
128.2CSEL 22:638–639
Huc etiam uox haec prophetica conuenit: saepe inpugnauerunt me a iuuentute mea. fiduciae maximae gratulatio est tantorum et tam numerosorum bellorum recordari; sed nunc tacito inpugnantium nomine inpugnatio sola memoratur. et causa noscenda est, cur auctores inpugnationis silentur. omnes humanae iniuriae, quae religiosis uiris inferuntur, non eosdem habent auctores, quos habent ministros. exsecutio quidem hominum est, sed diaboli instinctus est. et huius nobis intellegentiae apostolus auctor est dicens: non enim nobis certamen est aduersus carnem et sanguinem, sed aduersus potestates, mundi potentes harum tenebrarum, spiritales nequitias in caelestibus, et rursum: secundum principem aeris huius, spiritus, qui nunc operatur in filiis inoboedientise. operantur ergo hae spiritales nequitiae in his, qui inoboedientes dei legi sunt, quos uoluntatis suae tamquam operarios eligunt, in res suas alienae intercessionis ministerio usuri.
To this the prophetic voice also agrees: "Often have they fought against me from my youth." It is a rejoicing of the greatest confidence to remember so many and such numerous wars; but here, the name of the attackers being left unspoken, only the attack is mentioned. And we must learn the reason why the authors of the attack are passed over in silence. All the human injuries inflicted on religious men do not have the same authors as they have agents. The carrying out is indeed men's, but the prompting is the devil's. The apostle is our authority for this understanding, saying: "For our contest is not against flesh and blood, but against powers, the world-rulers of this darkness, spiritual wickedness in the heavenly places"; and again: "according to the prince of this air, the spirit that now works in the sons of disobedience." These spiritual wickednesses, then, work in those who are disobedient to the law of God, whom they choose as workmen of their will, to use in their affairs the service of another's agency.
128.3CSEL 22:639
Neque solum id ex apostolicis dictis intellegimus, sed etiam ex libro Iob docemur. cum enim diabolus potestatem temptandi Iob postulasset, per direptionem substantiae eius primum desseuiturus homines ad pastorum caedem et ad direptionem pecudum excitauit eosque in hanc uoluntatem latrocinii accendit. egit ergo, quod uolebat, per humanae operationis officium. Iudas quoque in passione domini ministerium diaboli fuit, et per eum effectum uoluntatis est propriae exsecutus euangelista testante ita: intrauit, inquit, satanas in Iudam, qui cognominatur Scariotha.
We understand this not only from the apostle's words, but we are also taught it from the book of Job. For when the devil had asked for power to tempt Job, intending first to rage against him by plundering his substance, he stirred up men to slaughter the shepherds and plunder the flocks, and kindled them to this will for robbery. He did, then, what he wanted through the service of human agency. Judas too, in the Lord's passion, was the devil's agent, and through him the devil carried out the effect of his own will, as the evangelist testifies thus: "Satan," it says, "entered into Judas, who is surnamed Iscariot."
128.4CSEL 22:639–640
In omni igitur, quam perpetimur, iniuria alterius opus, alterius instinctus est: et non sibi efficit, quisquis aliquid per turbulentae uoluntatis impetum gerit. non ergo his irascendum est, a quibus aliqua perpetimur, sed quotiensque per contumelias ad iracundiam prouocamur, quotiensque per conuicia ad lites excitamur, quotiensque ad dolorem et impiam damni querellam per rapinas et furta conpellimur aut in corporis uoluptates blandae adhortationis sollicitamur instinctu, agnoscendus est hostis ille, per quem haec operum ac dictorum incentiua praebentur. neque irascendum est hominibus alienae instigationis operariis, sed potius in his detestandi officii intercessio foeda miseranda est, quod sint uasa diaboli, satanae ministerium et latrocinantium tela et alienae militiae ac nequitiae paritores. ob hanc ergo cognitionem propheta sine distinctione nominis tantum inpugnantium meminit, de his atque illis indiscrete locutus, quia per homines in se id, quod spiritalium nequitiarum est, gerebatur.
In every injury we suffer, then, the deed is one person's and the prompting another's; and whoever does something through the impulse of a troubled will is not acting for himself. We must not, therefore, be angry with those from whom we suffer anything; rather, whenever we are provoked to anger by insults, whenever we are stirred to quarrels by abuse, whenever we are driven to grief and an impious complaint of loss by robbery and theft, or are solicited to the pleasures of the body by the prompting of flattering exhortation, we must recognize that enemy through whom these incitements of deeds and words are offered. Nor must we be angry with men, the workmen of another's instigation; rather, the foul agency of their detestable service in them is to be pitied, because they are the vessels of the devil, the servants of Satan, the weapons of robbers, and the attendants of another's warfare and wickedness. Because of this knowledge, then, the prophet mentions only the attackers, without distinguishing them by name, speaking of these and those indiscriminately, since what belongs to the spiritual wickednesses was being done against him through men.
128.5CSEL 22:640–641
Coepit itaque tamquam ex persona sua propheta; sed quid a nobis dici oporteret, quodam ipse confessionis exemplo ante praeloquitur. talis enim ordo dictorum est: saepe inpugnauerunt me a iuuentute mea, dicat nunc Israhel. ante ergo docetur Israhel, quid dicere debeat; tum deinde tamquam doctus et exemplo propheticae confessionis inbutus Israhel ipse iam loquitur: saepe inpugnauerunt me a iuuentute mea: etenim non poterant mihi. talis religiosorum debet esse confessio. et haec uera fidei probatio est, ut, qui saepe et a iuuentute inpugnent, numquam tamen eorum, quos et saepe et pridem inpugnauerint, prsepotentes sint. aduersus autem ualidiores et longum et frequens est praelium; idcirco inimicae spiritalesque uirtutes firmos fide et timore dei uiros et diu et saepe pertemptant, quia iterari necesse est, quod et diu geritur et numquam obtinetur. maneamus ergo, ut saepe inpugnemur, et saepe inpugnati habeamus hanc gloriam, ne aliquando cedamus; et hinc sit inpugnationis nostrae adsiduitas, quia non sit inpugnantium praepotens fortitudo.
The prophet began, then, as if in his own person; but by an example of confession he first speaks beforehand what we ought to say. For the order of the words is this: "Often have they fought against me from my youth, let Israel now say." First, then, Israel is taught what it ought to say; then, as one taught and instructed by the example of the prophet's confession, Israel itself now speaks: "Often have they fought against me from my youth, yet they could not prevail against me." Such ought to be the confession of the religious. And this is the true proof of faith: that those who fight often and from youth never prevail over those whom they have fought often and long. Against the stronger, the battle is both long and frequent; therefore the hostile spiritual powers try men firm in faith and in the fear of God both long and often, because what is waged long and never won must be repeated. Let us remain firm, then, so as to be fought against often, and, often fought against, let us have this glory: that we never yield. And let the persistence of the attack upon us come from this, that the strength of the attackers is not overpowering.
128.6CSEL 22:641
Mos autem est eorum, qui nequaquam longis atque adsiduis proeliis prseualent, ut uictorem exercitum et firmis agminibus incedentem a tergo adeant et dorso, sicubi iam praetereat, insidias machinentur, illic dolos fabricentur, illic omnia insidiarum artificia exerceant. ita et peccatores temptatos in cassum fideles uiros euntes iam in ueritatis uia dorso adeunt dorso insidiantur, dorso dolos concinnant. et idcirco ait: supra dorsum meum fabricabant peccatores. currit apostolus ea, quae retro sunt. obliuiscens seque in ea, quae priora sunt, extendens. lex ad fideles ita locuta est: persequentur te inimici tui et non conprehendent. non conprehendisse autem eos docet, cum ait: fabricabant, indefiniti enim temporis significatio est. fabricabant enim semper, numquam fabricationis suse effectum consequentes, indefesso fidei cursu eo, cui cotidie supra dorsum fabricabantur bella, currente.
It is the habit of those who cannot prevail in long and continuous battles to come at a victorious army advancing in firm columns from the rear, and to plot ambushes against its back wherever it is passing by, to devise tricks there, and to employ all the arts of ambush there. So too sinners, having tempted the faithful in vain, come at them from behind as they now go on the way of truth: they lie in wait at their back, they contrive tricks at their back. And therefore it says: "Upon my back the sinners were building." The apostle runs, forgetting what lies behind and stretching out to what lies ahead. The Law spoke thus to the faithful: "Your enemies will pursue you and will not overtake you." And he teaches that they did not overtake them when he says "they were building," for it signifies an indefinite time. They were always building, never attaining the effect of their building, while he, upon whose back wars were daily being built, ran on in the untiring course of faith.
128.7CSEL 22:641–642
Atque hanc pertinacem infestantium iniquitatem sequens uersusabsoluit: prolongauerunt iniquitatem ipsorum. Esaiae prophetia est dicentis: uae qui trahunt peccata sua tamquam funem longum. non desinunt enim peccatis peccata conectere et tamquam funis modo in longum inplexa ea semper extendere. sancto namque currente et peccatoribus in dorsum fabricantibus, cum huic ad destinatum currendi, illis semper fabricandi modus nullus sit, fit peccatorum prolixa series et multiplex longitudo.
And the following verse completes this stubborn iniquity of the attackers: "They prolonged their iniquity." It is the prophecy of Isaiah, who says: "Woe to those who drag their sins like a long rope." For they do not cease to join sins to sins and, like a rope, always to stretch them out, twisted together, at length. For while the saint runs and the sinners build upon his back, since he has no limit to running toward the goal and they none to building, a long series and manifold length of sins comes about.
128.8CSEL 22:642–643
Sed quid tandem hanc iniquitatum longitudinem maneat, noscendum est. sequitur enim: dominus iustus concidet ceruices peccatorum. iustus dominus, patiens scilicet in ultionem, dissimulator ad paenitentiae tempus, non inter exordia humanae iniquitatis promptus ad poenam, sed desinendi a criminibus seram licet uoluntatem peccatorum expectans, tum ceruices concidet, cum sine aliquo desinendi modo fabricatur, cum in longum peccata tenduntur, cum iam omne patientis misericordiae tempus exclusum est. exprobrari autem semper contumacibus legis meminimus, quod dura ceruice sint: cum ceruicosum populum esse Moyses ad deum arguit, cum propheta filiabus Sion exprobrat, quod alta ceruice incedant, ceruice scilicet iugum dedignante, operibus fidei insolente, patientia dei ad producendam peccatorum longitudinem abutente. summittenda autem ceruix est iugo suaui, ad quod dominus inuitat dicens: tollite iugum meum super uos et discite a me, quia mitis sum et humilis corde. non concidenda ceruix est huic se iugo subdens. est enim hoc humilitatis et mansuetudinis iugum, non semper inpugnans, non in dorso fabricans, non peccata prolongans, sed humilitate et patientia ceruicem subditam fouens, superba illa insolentique ceruice iusti iudicii concidenda decreto.
But we must learn what awaits this length of iniquities at last. For there follows: "The righteous Lord will cut the necks of sinners." The righteous Lord, patient in vengeance, overlooking sins for a time of repentance, not quick to punish at the beginnings of human iniquity, but awaiting the will of sinners to cease from their crimes, however late, will cut their necks when they build without any limit of ceasing, when sins are stretched out at length, when all the time of patient mercy has been shut out. We remember that the stubborn are always reproached by the Law for being stiff-necked: when Moses accuses the people before God of being stiff-necked, when the prophet reproaches the daughters of Zion for walking with outstretched neck, a neck, namely, that disdains the yoke, is insolent toward the works of faith, and abuses the patience of God to prolong the length of sins. The neck must be bowed to the sweet yoke to which the Lord invites, saying: "Take my yoke upon you and learn from me, for I am meek and humble of heart." The neck that submits to this yoke is not to be cut. For this is the yoke of humility and meekness: not always attacking, not building on the back, not prolonging sins, but cherishing the neck bowed in humility and patience, while that proud and insolent neck is to be cut by the decree of righteous judgment.
128.9CSEL 22:643–644
Dehinc sequitur: confundantur et reuertantur retrorsum omnes, qui oderunt Sion. frequenter admonuimus Sion montem esse Hierusalem proximum. sed cum rex Sion, cum filia Sion, cum portae Sion a prophetis nuncupantur, primum ipso nomine intellegi oportet aliud sub Sion significatione monstrari; Sion enim speculationis interpretatio est et, quod nobiscum speculatio, id hebraice Sion dicitur. tum deinde dicti apostolici meminisse nos conuenit, ad montem Sion et Hierusalem caelestem accessisse nos in dominum nostrum Iesum Christum credentes, in cuius glorifico corpore, quod in caelestem gloriam transformatum est, spei nostrae honorem speculamur, humilitatis nostrae corpore in gloriam corporis sui conformando. ecclesiam autem esse corpus Christi, cuius inuicem membra sumus, apostolus testis est, quae ipsa sit Sion mons Domini, regis filia, ciuitas sancta uiuis lapidibus in fundamento prophetarum et apostolorum sedificata. hanc ergo Sion quisquis odit, odit eum, cuius et corpus est; est enim speciale aduersus fideles infidelium odium. confundendi ergo erunt, qui Sion oderunt, et retrorsum reuertentur, non in caelestia currentes neque ad futura tendentes, sed ad terrena sua et originalia reuertentes, pudorem iniquitatis et infidelitatis suae iudicii tempore sentientes et in poenalem corporum sensum amissa resurrectionis demutatione redeuntes.
Then follows: "Let all who hate Zion be confounded and turned back." We have often pointed out that Zion is a mountain next to Jerusalem. But when the prophets speak of the king of Zion, the daughter of Zion, the gates of Zion, we must first understand from the very name that something else is shown under the meaning of Zion; for Zion means watchtower, and what with us is called a watchtower is in Hebrew called Zion. Then it is fitting for us to remember the apostle's saying, that by believing in our Lord Jesus Christ we have come to Mount Zion and the heavenly Jerusalem; in his glorious body, which has been transformed into heavenly glory, we behold from the watchtower the honor of our hope, since the body of our lowliness is to be conformed to the glory of his body. And the apostle is witness that the church is the body of Christ, whose members we are of one another; and she herself is Zion, the mountain of the Lord, the king's daughter, the holy city built with living stones on the foundation of the prophets and apostles. Whoever, then, hates this Zion hates him whose body she is; for the hatred of unbelievers against the faithful is a special one. Those who hate Zion, then, will be confounded and turned back, not running toward heavenly things nor stretching toward the future, but turning back to their earthly and original things, feeling in the time of judgment the shame of their iniquity and unbelief, and returning to the penal sensation of their bodies, having lost the transformation of the resurrection.
128.10CSEL 22:644–645
Idipsum autem psalmi consequentia docent: fiant sicut faenum aedificiorum, quod, priusquam euellatur. aruit: de quo non inplebit manum suam, qui metet, et sinum suum, qui manipulos colliget. et non dixerunt, qui praeteribant: benedictio domini super uos. nullum, ut arbitror, secundum corporalem intellegentiam aedificiorum faenum est: est agri eiusdemque fructuosissimi. ergo nihil hic secundum aurium sensum tractandum atque opinandum est. sunt autem secundum scripturae auctoritatem aedificia firma, sunt et infirma. firma sunt, quae fundamentis fidelibus supra petram iacta fluuiis, uentis, inundationibus non mouentur. sunt et infirma, quae harenoso aedificata fundamine, cum tempestates ortae erunt, efficiunt ingentem ruinam. sunt et sationes duae secundum apostolum, spiritus atque carnis: et qui spiritalia seuerit, spiritalia metet; et qui carnalia seuerit, carnalia metet. ergo qui saepe et pridem inpugnant. qui super dorsum fabricabantur, qui prolongauerunt iniquitates, quorum concidentur ceruices, qui oderunt Sion, hi sicut faenum aedificiorum erunt inutiles et corporeae huius praesentisque uitae fructum cassum inanemque referentes. aedificia enim atque tecta secundum euangelicam conparationem humana sunt corpora aut fide firma aut infidelitate ruitura. ab hoc etiam aedificii tecto instante persecutione dominus unumquemque uetuit descendere dicens: et qui super tectum est, non descendat tollere de domo aliquid. certe in persecutione fugiendum est: et quomodo de tecto inhibuit descendere, nisi quod cura corporis derelicta, quia super tectum insistens, id est super terrenam naturam manens, humilia repetere et descendere ad inferiora prohibetur? uerum impii aedificiorum fenum sunt — inania enim seuerunt — et faenum etiam, antequam euellatur, arescens, de quo neque manum suam messor inplebit neque sinum manipulos collecturus onerabit, non praeteriens fructuum gratulatione benedixit. inanes sunt, uacui sunt, inutiles sunt; inania enim et inutilia seuerunt. o infelices labores et infructuosa carnis opera infructuoso aedificiorum faeno conparata et, antequam euellantur, arida, id est ante ipsum inutilis ipsius messis tempus emortua.
The sequence of the psalm teaches this very thing: "Let them become like the grass of the housetops, which withers before it is plucked up: with which the reaper will not fill his hand, nor he who gathers sheaves his bosom. And those who passed by did not say: The blessing of the Lord be upon you." There is, I think, no grass of buildings in the bodily sense: grass belongs to a field, and a most fruitful one. So nothing here is to be treated and supposed according to the sense of the ears. According to the authority of Scripture there are firm buildings and there are weak ones. Firm are those which, laid on faithful foundations upon the rock, are not moved by rivers, winds, and floods. Weak too are those which, built on a sandy foundation, make a great ruin when storms arise. There are also two sowings, according to the apostle, of the spirit and of the flesh: and he who sows spiritual things will reap spiritual things, and he who sows carnal things will reap carnal things. Those, then, who fight often and long, who were building on the back, who prolonged iniquities, whose necks will be cut, who hate Zion, will be useless like the grass of the housetops, bringing back an empty and vain fruit of this bodily and present life. For buildings and roofs, according to the Gospel comparison, are human bodies, either firm by faith or about to fall through unbelief. From this roof of the building the Lord forbade each one to come down when persecution presses, saying: "And let him who is on the housetop not come down to take anything from the house." Certainly one must flee in persecution; and how did he forbid coming down from the roof, except that, the care of the body being abandoned, he who stands on the roof, that is, remains above his earthly nature, is forbidden to seek again lowly things and go down to what is beneath? But the impious are the grass of buildings, for they have sown empty things; and grass that withers even before it is plucked up, with which the reaper will not fill his hand, nor will the one about to gather sheaves load his bosom; and the passer-by has not blessed it with rejoicing over its fruits. They are empty, they are void, they are useless; for they have sown empty and useless things. O unhappy labors and fruitless works of the flesh, compared to the fruitless grass of buildings, dry before they are plucked up, that is, dead before the very time of their own useless harvest!
128.11CSEL 22:645–646
Sed quia horum aedificiorum faenum carnalium operum fructus esse tractauimus, considerandum est, quae differentia sit in eo, qui implet manum et qui manipulos sinu colligit. non enim idem est neque scriptura res easdem iterare geminis elocutionibus solita est; plus est enim sinu colligere quam manum replere. et quidem qui manum replent, fructum recipere recte gestorum uidentur, quia in manibus sermo diuinus opera significat; in sinu uero conscientiae et fidei et perfectae uoluntatis monstratur adfectus. plus enim metit conscientia quam gesta; haec namque manum replent, manipulos uero illa sinu colligit. duos denarios uiduae inopis acceptiores dominus habet copiosis diuitum nummis. tanto praestat operibus uoluntas. et opera ob id manum inplent, sed sinus manipulis sunt capaces. ergo hoc aedificii faenum neque metentis manum neque manipulos colligentis sinum replebit.
But since we have treated this grass of buildings as the fruit of carnal works, we must consider what difference there is between him who fills his hand and him who gathers sheaves into his bosom. For it is not the same, nor is Scripture accustomed to repeat the same things in two expressions; for to gather into the bosom is more than to fill the hand. Those who fill the hand seem to receive the fruit of things rightly done, since in the hands the divine word signifies works; but in the bosom is shown the disposition of conscience, of faith, and of a perfect will. For conscience reaps more than deeds; deeds fill the hand, but conscience gathers sheaves into the bosom. The Lord holds the two coins of the poor widow more acceptable than the abundant money of the rich. So much does the will surpass works. And works therefore fill the hand, but the bosom can hold the sheaves. This grass of the building, then, will fill neither the reaper's hand nor the bosom of the one who gathers sheaves.
128.12CSEL 22:646–647
Sed neque praetereuntes dicent: benedictio domini super uos. et qui sunt praetereuntes nisi qui tamquam peregrinantes corporalis uitae saeculum transeunt, non manentes in his, quae nulla sunt, sed ad aeterna tendentes; neque his, quae conspectui subiacent, inmorantes, sed ad inuisibilia pergentes? ut autem penitus, qui sint transeuntes, intellegamus, audiamus Moysen loquentem tum, cum in rubo ignem conspexit sine damno rubi, in quo conflagrabat, ardentem. ait enim: transibo et uidebo uisionem hanc. quid est istud: transibo? nulla eum locorum interualla discreuerant, eodem in loco et loquitur et uidet; quid ergo transit? transit plane carnales corporalesque curas: et soceri sui oues pascens in caelestem cognitionem relictis terrenis operibus excedit. uerum et ipse pertransit, qui in superiore psalmo ait: uidi inpium superexaltatum et eleuatum super cedros Libani: et transiui, et ecce non erat. quem admiratus in saeculi rebus est, quem in corporeis operibus manens excelsum elatumque conspexit, hunc transiens, id est peregrinus saeculo factus et in caelestem ac spiritalem cognitionem de terrenis et caducis rebus excedens, hunc in nihilum habuit et iam non esse dixit et mortuum deputauit. negant ergo aedificiorum faeno praetereuntes dei benedictionem, fructibus aridis et caducis scientes gratiam diuini muneris denegandam.
"But neither will those who pass by say: The blessing of the Lord be upon you." And who are those who pass by, if not those who, as pilgrims, pass through the age of bodily life, not remaining in things that are nothing but stretching toward eternal things, not lingering among what lies before the eyes but proceeding to the invisible? And so that we may understand fully who those passing over are, let us hear Moses speaking when he saw in the bush a fire burning without harm to the bush in which it blazed. For he says: "I will pass over and see this sight." What is this "I will pass over"? No distance of place separated him; he speaks and sees in the same place. What, then, does he pass over? Plainly he passes over fleshly and bodily cares: and while pasturing the sheep of his father-in-law, he leaves earthly works behind and goes out into heavenly knowledge. He too passes over who says in an earlier psalm: "I saw the wicked highly exalted and lifted up above the cedars of Lebanon; and I passed by, and behold, he was not." The one he admired in the affairs of the world, the one whom, while remaining in bodily works, he saw lofty and exalted, this one, in passing over, that is, having become a pilgrim to the world and going out from earthly and perishable things into heavenly and spiritual knowledge, he held as nothing, said no longer existed, and counted as dead. Those who pass by, then, deny God's blessing to the grass of buildings, knowing that the grace of the divine gift must be refused to dry and perishable fruits.
128.13CSEL 22:647
Sed prophetae uota dura atque aspera esse credentur; totus enim eius sermo tamquam optantis fuit, cum ait: fiant sicut fsenum aedificiorum. sed absit istud, ut propheta precatus esse credatur. ex prophetali autem scientia hac locutus est, et cognitionis fuit sermo iste, non uoti: simul ut peccatoribus terror ingrueret inanitatem fructuum suorum aedificiorum cognituris.
But the prophet's prayers will be thought harsh and severe; for all his speech was as of one who wishes, when he says: "Let them become like the grass of the housetops." But far be it that the prophet should be believed to have prayed this. He spoke from prophetic knowledge, and this saying was one of knowledge, not of wishing: at the same time, that terror might fall upon sinners who would come to know the emptiness of the fruits of their buildings.
128.14CSEL 22:647
Porro autem uotorum suorum ostendit adfectum dicens: benedicamus uos in nomine domini. prompta benedictio est his, qui serebant aedificiorum fsenum, si serere incipiant, quod messoris manum et colligentis manipulos sinum repleat. aridis ergo operibus emortuos fructus suos in faeno aedificiorum propheta monstrauit benedictiones negando: uota autem sua erga paenitentium salutem pro reditu bonae operationis ostendit benedictiones rursum, quas negauit, optando. seramus ergo utiliter et labores nostros in replendis manibus ac sinibus praeparemus, ut benedictionum dei participes simus in domino nostro Iesu Christo, qui est benedictus in saecula saeculorum. amen.
Moreover, he shows the disposition of his own wishes, saying: "We bless you in the name of the Lord." Blessing is ready for those who were sowing the grass of the housetops, if they begin to sow what will fill the reaper's hand and the bosom of the one who gathers sheaves. By denying blessings, then, the prophet showed their fruits dead in the grass of buildings because of their dry works; but by wishing again for the blessings he had denied, he showed his own wishes for the salvation of the penitent upon their return to good work. Let us sow profitably, then, and prepare our labors to fill hands and bosoms, so that we may share in the blessings of God in our Lord Jesus Christ, who is blessed for ever and ever. Amen.
Tractates 129
129.1CSEL 22:647–649
Inter multa praeclara, quae ad Romanos apostolus scribit, cum de fide gentium et infidelitate Iudaeorum locutus esset et multa super iudiciis dei decretisque tractasset, ait: o profundum diuitiarum sapientiae et sapientiae dei, quam sunt inexcrutabilia iudicia eius et inuestigabiles uiae eius! quis enim cognouit sensum domini aut quis consiliarius eius fuit? aut quis ante dedit ei et retribuetur illi? quia ex ipso et per ipsum et in ipso sunt omnia: ipsi claritas in saecula saeculorum. humanae infirmitatis religiosa confessio est, ex deo hoc solum nosse, quod deus est. ceterum secreta illa et profunda inperspicabilis iudicii decreta mens terrena non penetrat. inuestigare quidem ea perscrutarique pium est. sed inexcrutabilia ea esse et inuestigabilia confitenda sunt: quorum est alterum religiosae uoluntatis, alterum inperspicabilis naturae. quis enim causas naturasque caeli et huius et superioris et ceterorum sciet? quis angelorum et potestatum et dominatuum et thronorum et principatuum officia rationesque perceperit? quis Cherubim et Seraphim perpetuas uoces aeternasque intelleget? quis laudantes deum super caelum aquas cognoscet? quis solis, lunae et astrorum lumina conperta esse sibi gloriabitur? quis hanc inanis nobis, ut falso putamus. aeris plenitudinem metietur? iam uero quis aut dispositionem orbis terrarum aut elementorum uirtutes aut temporum mutationes aut fluminum cursus aut maris fines aut oceani uicissitudines aut uentorum flatus aut naturas animalium aut iras bestiarum aut genera arborum aut uirtutes radicum et origines animarum et incrementa corporum et infantium mortes et senum uitas et labores saeculi et sanctorum gloriosas calamitates et inreligiosorum infelices beatitudines et legis et prophetarum et euangeliorum et apostolorum arcano caelesti libros consecratos plenae cognitionis scientia consequetur?
Among the many splendid things the apostle writes to the Romans, when he had spoken of the faith of the Gentiles and the unbelief of the Jews and had treated much about the judgments and decrees of God, he says: "O the depth of the riches of the wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable are his judgments and untraceable his ways! For who has known the mind of the Lord, or who has been his counselor? Or who has first given to him, and it will be repaid him? For from him and through him and in him are all things: to him be glory for ever and ever." It is the religious confession of human weakness to know of God only this, that he is God. But the earthly mind does not penetrate those secret and deep decrees of an impenetrable judgment. To investigate and search them out is indeed pious; but it must be confessed that they are unsearchable and untraceable: the one belongs to a religious will, the other to an impenetrable nature. For who will know the causes and natures of the heaven, both of this one and of the higher one and of the rest? Who will have grasped the offices and principles of angels and powers and dominions and thrones and principalities? Who will understand the perpetual and eternal voices of the Cherubim and Seraphim? Who will know the waters above the heaven that praise God? Who will boast that the lights of the sun, moon, and stars are known to him? Who will measure this fullness of the air, which we falsely think empty? And who will attain, with the knowledge of full understanding, the arrangement of the world, the powers of the elements, the changes of the seasons, the courses of rivers, the bounds of the sea, the tides of the ocean, the blowing of the winds, the natures of animals, the rages of beasts, the kinds of trees, the virtues of roots, the origins of souls, the growth of bodies, the deaths of infants and the lives of old men, the labors of the world, the glorious calamities of the saints and the unhappy prosperity of the irreligious, and the books of the Law, the Prophets, the Gospels, and the apostles, consecrated in heavenly secrecy?
129.2CSEL 22:649
In his igitur omnibus haerens ac detentus propheta ex interno cordis sui secreto secundum apostoli uocem et ipse proclamat dicens: de profundis clamaui ad te, domine. pone illum secundum apostolum in profundo diuitiarum dei inperscrutabilium et inuestigabilium demorantem, statue illum de profundo humanarum calamitatum aestu precantem secundum eam domini, quse in anteriore psalmo est, uocem: ueni in profundum maris, et tempestas demersit me, existima illum non labiis, sed secreto, ut iussum est, cordis orare: apta aut ignorationi aut passioni aut orationi uox ista dicentis est: de profundis clamaui ad te, domine, dum aut nescit aut patitur aut precatur. et quia de profundis clamat, confidenter ait: domine exaudi uocem meam, fiant aures tuae intendentes in uocem orationis meae.
Clinging and held fast, then, in all these things, the prophet too cries out from the inner secret of his heart, in keeping with the apostle's voice, saying: "Out of the depths I have cried to you, O Lord." Place him, according to the apostle, lingering in the depth of God's unsearchable and untraceable riches; set him praying from the depth of the surge of human calamities, according to that voice of the Lord in an earlier psalm: "I came into the depth of the sea, and the storm overwhelmed me"; consider him praying not with the lips but, as is commanded, in the secret of the heart: this voice of the speaker fits ignorance, or suffering, or prayer: "Out of the depths I have cried to you, O Lord," while he either does not know, or suffers, or prays. And since he cries out of the depths, he says with confidence: "Lord, hear my voice; let your ears be attentive to the voice of my prayer."
129.3CSEL 22:649–650
Sed quaerendum est, an idipsum sit exaudi uocem meam et fiant aures tuse intendentes in uocem orationis meae. de profundis enim orat et profundum est, quidquid orat. ac primum intellegendum est deum incorporalem esse neque ex partibus quibusdam atque officiis membrorum, ex quibus unum corpus efficitur, consistere. legimus enim in euangelio: quoniam deus spiritus est, inuisibilis scilicet et inmensa atque intra se manens et aeterna natura. scriptum quoque est: quoniam spiritus carnem et ossa non habet. ex his enim corporis membra consistunt, quibus substantia dei non eget. deus autem, qui et ubique et in omnibus est, totus audit, totus uidet, totus efficit, totus incedit. et hoc ex scripturis docemur, cum dicitur: ego sum deus adpropians, et non de longe, et rursum: quoniam in ipso et uiuimus et mouemur et sumus. uirtus ergo dei, quse aequalis et indiscreta est, officiorum ac membrorum habet nomina, ut uirtus. qua uidet, oculi sint; uirtus, qua audit, aures sint; uirtus, qua efficit, manus sint; uirtus, qua adest, pedes sint, officiorum diuersitates uirtutis huius potestate peragente. deus ergo ubique est et ubicumque adest, audit, uidet, efficit; sed orandus a nobis est, ut secundum precem nostram adsit, audiat uideat, efficiat. naturae suae est, ut audiat; sed fidei nostrae est, ut precemur audiri. audit conuiciantes, audit maledicentes, audit etiam intra secreta cordis loquentes; sed fides officium suum exsequitur, ut dei auditionem roget, ut, qui per naturam suam audit, per orantis precem dignetur audire.
But we must ask whether "hear my voice" and "let your ears be attentive to the voice of my prayer" are the same thing. For he prays out of the depths, and whatever he prays is deep. And first we must understand that God is incorporeal and does not consist of certain parts and functions of members, from which a single body is made. For we read in the Gospel: "For God is spirit," that is, an invisible, boundless nature, abiding within itself and eternal. It is also written: "For a spirit does not have flesh and bones." Of these the members of a body consist, which the substance of God does not need. But God, who is everywhere and in all things, hears as a whole, sees as a whole, acts as a whole, moves as a whole. And this we are taught from the Scriptures when it is said: "I am a God who draws near, and not from afar"; and again: "For in him we live and move and are." The power of God, then, which is equal and undivided, has the names of functions and members: so that the power by which he sees is his eyes, the power by which he hears is his ears, the power by which he acts is his hands, the power by which he is present is his feet, the might of this power carrying out the diversity of functions. God, then, is everywhere, and wherever he is present he hears, sees, acts; but he must be prayed to by us, so that according to our prayer he may be present, hear, see, act. It belongs to his nature that he hears; but it belongs to our faith that we pray to be heard. He hears those who revile, he hears those who curse, he hears even those who speak within the secret of the heart; but faith carries out its own duty in asking for God's hearing, so that he who hears by his nature may deign to hear through the prayer of the one who prays.
129.4CSEL 22:650–651
Quod si qui forte corporeum deum et conformabilem et membris diuersum, quia non idem oculus quod et manus est, ob id esse existimabit, quod dictum est: faciamus hominem ad imaginem et similitudinem nostram, primum meminisse debet hominum institutionem naturis duabus contineri, animae scilicet et corporis, quarum alia spiritalis, alia terrena est, et inferiorem hanc materiam ad efficientiam atque operationem naturae illius fuisse potioris aptatam. ergo quisquis ita uolet credere, ut corporalis deus sit, quia ad imaginem eius homo factus est, conpositum esse deum statuet, ex potiore scilicet inferioreque natura, quia de talibus homo constat. quidquid autem conpositum est, necesse est non fuerit aeternum; quia conpositio habet initium, quo conparatur, ut maneat. sed haec infidelitatis deliramenta sunt, dum per caelestis naturae ignorationem intra has opinionis angustias uitio ingenii degeneris coartatur.
But if anyone perhaps thinks that God is bodily, capable of shape, and differentiated in members (since the eye is not the same as the hand) on account of the saying: "Let us make man in our image and likeness," he must first remember that the constitution of man is contained in two natures, namely soul and body, of which one is spiritual and the other earthly, and that this lower matter was fitted to the efficacy and working of that superior nature. Whoever, then, wishes to believe that God is bodily because man was made in his image will be holding that God is composite, namely of a superior and an inferior nature, because man consists of such. But whatever is composite cannot have been eternal, because composition has a beginning by which it is brought about so that it may remain. But these are the ravings of unbelief, confined within these narrow limits of opinion through the fault of a degenerate mind, by ignorance of the heavenly nature.
129.5CSEL 22:651
Deus autem, qui semper et in omnibus manens ubicumque idem et nusquam ipse non totus est, cum pulcherrimum opus perfecto iam mundo inchoaret, hominem scilicet ad imaginem sui faciens, eum ex humili natura caelestique conposuit, anima uidelicet et corpore. et prius quidem animam diuino illo et inconprehensibili nobis uirtutis suae opere constituit. non enim, cum ad imaginem dei hominem fecit, tunc et corpus effecit. Genesis docet longe postea, quam ad imaginem dei homo erat factus, puluerem sumptum formatumque corpus, dehinc rursum in animam uiuentem per inspirationem dei factum, naturam hanc scilicet terrenam atque caelestem quodam inspirationis foedere copulatam.
God, however, who abiding always and in all things is everywhere the same and nowhere not wholly himself, when, the world now completed, he began his most beautiful work, namely making man in his own image, composed him of a lowly and a heavenly nature, that is, of soul and body. And first he established the soul by that divine work of his power, incomprehensible to us. For when he made man in the image of God, he did not then also make the body. Genesis teaches that long after man had been made in the image of God, dust was taken and the body formed, and then again it was made into a living soul by the breathing of God; that is, this earthly and heavenly nature was joined by a kind of covenant of inbreathing.
129.6CSEL 22:651–652
Scit se beatus apostolus Paulus per interiorem et exteriorem hominem dissidere. per interiorem quidem hominem delectatur lege, per exteriorem uero hoc, quod non uult, agit: cum interior homo spiritus opera desiderat, exterior uoluptates corporis concupiscit. ergo ad imaginem dei homo interior effectus est rationabilis, mobilis, mouens, citus, incorporeus subtilis, aeternus. quantum in se est, speciem naturae principalis imitatur, dum transcurrit, dum circumuolat et dicto citius nunc ultra oceanum est, nunc in caelos euolat, nunc in abyssis est, nunc orientem occidentemque perlustrat, dum numquam, ut non sit, aboletur — natura quidem dei in his omnibus est — neque, ut alibi adsit, decedit aliunde. sed anima humana in hac sensus sui mobilitate ad imaginem dei opificis sui facta est, dum naturam dei mobilitas animae perennis imitatur, nihil in se habens corporale, nihil terrenum, nihil graue, nihil caducum. et audiamus adhuc Paulum ita docentem: expoliantes ueterem hominem cum gestis eius et induentes nouum, qui renouatur in cognitionem secundum imaginem creatoris. numquid aliquid corporale induimus, cum in agnitionem renouamur? nihil. ut opinor. induimus autem agnitionem dei, fidem aeternitatis, innocentiae sinceritatem, bonitatis mores. haec enim animae magis sunt indumenta quam corporis, quae omnia deo propria sunt. hsec in agnitionem noui induimus, ut in omni ministerio animae nostrae simus secundum imaginem creatoris bonitatis et sanctitatis et caritatis agnitione perfecti. haec propter aures dei, ne corporalis existimaretur, tractata breuibus sunt.
The blessed apostle Paul knows that he is at odds with himself through the inner and the outer man. Through the inner man he delights in the law, but through the outer he does what he does not want: while the inner man desires the works of the spirit, the outer craves the pleasures of the body. The inner man, then, was made in the image of God: rational, mobile, moving, swift, incorporeal, subtle, eternal. So far as lies in it, it imitates the form of the principal nature, as it runs across, as it flies around, and quicker than a word is now beyond the ocean, now flies up to the heavens, now is in the abysses, now traverses east and west, as it is never destroyed so as not to exist (the nature of God, indeed, is in all these places), nor departs from one place in order to be present elsewhere. But the human soul in this mobility of its perception was made in the image of God its maker, since the perpetual mobility of the soul imitates the nature of God, having in itself nothing bodily, nothing earthly, nothing heavy, nothing perishable. And let us hear Paul further teaching thus: "Stripping off the old man with his deeds, and putting on the new, who is renewed in knowledge according to the image of the creator." Do we put on anything bodily when we are renewed in knowledge? Nothing, I think. But we put on the knowledge of God, faith in eternity, the sincerity of innocence, the habits of goodness. For these are garments of the soul rather than of the body, and all of them are proper to God. These we put on for the knowledge of the new man, so that in every service of our soul we may be, according to the image of the creator, perfect in the knowledge of goodness, holiness, and love. These matters have been treated briefly on account of the ears of God, lest he be thought bodily.
129.7CSEL 22:652–653
Et quamquam haec ita se, ut dicta sunt, habeant, tamen meminimus esse plures spiritales uirtutes, quibus angelorum est nomen, uel ecclesiis prsesidentes. sunt enim secundum Iohannem Asianis ecclesiis angeli. sunt et Moyse testante secundum numerum angelorum fines gentium Adae filiis constituti. sunt et domino docente pusillorum angeli cotidie deum uidentes. sunt secundum Raphael ad Tobiam loquentem angeli adsistentes ante claritatem dei et orationes deprecantium ad dominum deferentes. hoc ideo commemoratum a nobis est, ut, si forte hos esse oculos uel aures uel manus uel pedes dei intellegere uoluerimus, habeamus non inprobabilis intellegentiae auctoritatem, maxime cum scriptum sit: sunt enim efficientes spiritus, in ministerium missi propter eos, qui hereditabunt salutem. intercessione itaque horum non natura dei eget, sed infirmitas nostra. missi enim sunt propter eos, qui hereditabunt salutem: deo nihil ex his, quae agimus, ignorante, sed infirmitate nostra ad rogandum et promerendum spiritalis intercessionis ministerio indigente.
And although these things are as has been said, yet we remember that there are many spiritual powers that bear the name of angels, or that preside over the churches. For according to John there are angels of the churches of Asia. There are also, as Moses testifies, the boundaries of the nations set for the sons of Adam according to the number of the angels. There are also, as the Lord teaches, the angels of the little ones who daily see God. There are, according to Raphael speaking to Tobias, angels who stand before the glory of God and carry the prayers of those who pray to the Lord. We have mentioned this so that, if perhaps we should wish to understand these as the eyes or ears or hands or feet of God, we may have the authority of a not improbable understanding, especially since it is written: "For they are working spirits, sent for service for the sake of those who will inherit salvation." Their intercession, then, is needed not by the nature of God but by our weakness. For they are sent for the sake of those who will inherit salvation: God is ignorant of nothing we do, but our weakness needs the service of spiritual intercession for asking and obtaining.
129.8CSEL 22:653–654
Dehinc sequitur: si iniquitates obseruabis, domine, quis sustinebit? non neglegenter dicti huius ratio tractanda est. non enim ait: si peccata obseruabis, sed: si iniquitates obseruabis. differt enim iniquitas a peccato. numquid deus peccata non obseruabit, et criminum memoria non erit? erit certe: quin etiam de otioso uerbo rationem unusquisque praestabit et omnis in carcerem missus reddet nouissimum quadrantem. differre autem iniquitatem et peccatum docemur, cum dicitur: beati, quorum remissae sunt iniquitates et quorum tecta sunt peccata, et rursum: iniquitatem meam ego agnoui et peccatum meum non abscondi. iniquitas enim omnis transgressio dei legis est, quae est grauior peccato. quod idipsum apostolus absolutissime distinxit dicens: qui enim inique peccauerunt, inique peribunt: qui autem per legem peccauerunt, per legem iudicabuntur. ergo peccatum iniquitatis iam perit, ceterum peccatum legis iudicabitur. peccatum autem iniquitatis est, quidquid extra legem delinquitur. ut gentilium crimina sunt, quae iam cum ipsa legis ignoratione damnata sunt. peccata autem in lege non pereunt, sed iudicanda sunt; quia, licet peccata sint; tamen in lege peccata sunt. ergo si deus iniquitatum recordetur, quis sustinebit furta, falsa testimonia, caedes, stupra, periuria? hsec enim crimina sunt, quse inique, id est extra legem dei, geruntur quaeque nouse generationis sacramento abluuntur.
Then follows: "If you will observe iniquities, O Lord, who will endure?" The reasoning of this saying must not be treated carelessly. For he does not say "if you will observe sins," but "if you will observe iniquities." For iniquity differs from sin. Will God not observe sins, and will there be no remembrance of crimes? Certainly there will: indeed, each one will render account even for an idle word, and everyone sent into prison will pay the last farthing. We are taught that iniquity and sin differ when it is said: "Blessed are those whose iniquities are forgiven and whose sins are covered"; and again: "I have acknowledged my iniquity and I have not hidden my sin." For iniquity is every transgression of God's law, and it is graver than sin. The apostle distinguished this very thing most completely, saying: "For those who have sinned without law will perish without law; but those who have sinned under the law will be judged by the law." The sin of iniquity, then, perishes at once, but the sin under the law will be judged. And the sin of iniquity is whatever offense is committed outside the law, as are the crimes of the Gentiles, which are condemned together with their very ignorance of the law. But sins within the law do not perish but are to be judged; because, although they are sins, they are sins within the law. If, then, God were to remember iniquities, who would endure thefts, false witness, murders, acts of sexual immorality, perjuries? For these are the crimes that are committed lawlessly, that is, outside the law of God, and that are washed away by the mystery of the new birth.
129.9CSEL 22:654–655
Sed horum plane iam deus non recordatur: et cur non recordetur, in sequenti uersu propheta demonstrat dicens: quia apud te propitiatio est. est enim unigenitus dei filius, deus uerbum, redemptio nostra, pax nostra, in cuius sanguine reconciliati deo sumus. hic est, qui uenit tollere peccata mundi. qui cruci suae chirographum legis adfigens edictum damnationis ueteris deleuit. siue igitur ad patrem, siue ad filium oratio prophetae esse existimabitur — unum enim ambo sunt, et qui uidit filium, uidit et patrem, quia pater in filio et filius in patre est; ex similitudine gloriae alter in altero gloriosus est: gloriosus filius, quia dignus consortio patris sit, gloriosus pater, digni consortio suo filii pater — recte, ad quem uoles, propheta dixisse credetur: quoniam apud te propitiatio est: quia in patre secundum similitudinem gloriae filius est, et filius ipse pro peccatis nostris et propitiatio et redemptio et deprecatio est, iniquitatum nostrarum, quia ipse earum propitiatio sit, non recordans.
But these God plainly no longer remembers; and why he does not remember, the prophet shows in the following verse, saying: "For with you is propitiation." For it is the only-begotten Son of God, God the Word, our redemption, our peace, in whose blood we have been reconciled to God. He it is who came to take away the sins of the world, who, nailing the bond of the law to his cross, blotted out the decree of the old condemnation. Whether, then, the prophet's prayer is thought to be addressed to the Father or to the Son (for both are one, and he who has seen the Son has seen the Father also, because the Father is in the Son and the Son in the Father; from the likeness of glory each is glorious in the other: the Son glorious because he is worthy of fellowship with the Father, the Father glorious because the Son is worthy of fellowship with him), the prophet will rightly be believed to have said to whichever you will: "For with you is propitiation": because the Son is in the Father according to the likeness of glory, and the Son himself is propitiation, redemption, and intercession for our sins, not remembering our iniquities because he himself is their propitiation.
129.10CSEL 22:655–656
Scit autem propheta ingentis periculi rem esse, inique, id est sine lege peccare, quia peccati sine lege perditio est, peccati autem in lege iudicium est. et idcirco ait: propter legem tuam sustinui te, domine. lex autem sancta et spiritalis est, et in ea uerba uitae sunt, et legis finis Christus est; et hoc sequenti uersu ostenditur. ait enim: sustinuit anima mea in uerbum tuum. corporalia quidem legis officia propheta exsequitur, scilicet sacrificiorum et holocaustomatum et neomeniarum et sabbatorum, quae omnia umbra sunt futurorum: sed anima eius sustinuit in uerbum dei. propter legem ipse sustinet, id est, ut dixi, corporaliter officia legis gerit. in uerbum autem dei anima sua sustinet: scilicet filii dei aduentum, qui et uerbum dei et deus uerbum est, spiritali fide expectat. qualiter autem expectet, demonstrat dicens: sperauit anima mea in domino a custodia matutina usque in noctem. recordemur euangelicae conparationis tenorem et meminerimus quosdam operarios uineae omnem diem in labore transigere. a custodia matutina usque in noctem propheta sperat: nullum tempus habet uacuum, totius diei indefessus operarius est.
The prophet knows that it is a matter of enormous danger to sin lawlessly, that is, without law, since sin without law brings perdition, while sin under the law brings judgment. And therefore he says: "Because of your law I have waited for you, O Lord." The law is holy and spiritual, and in it are the words of life, and Christ is the end of the law; and this is shown in the following verse, for he says: "My soul has waited on your word." The prophet carries out the bodily duties of the law, namely of sacrifices, burnt offerings, new moons, and sabbaths, all of which are a shadow of things to come; but his soul has waited on the Word of God. Because of the law he waits, that is, as I said, he performs the duties of the law bodily; but his soul waits on the Word of God: that is, he awaits with spiritual faith the coming of the Son of God, who is both the Word of God and God the Word. How he awaits it he shows, saying: "My soul has hoped in the Lord from the morning watch until night." Let us recall the tenor of the Gospel comparison and remember that certain workers in the vineyard spent the whole day in labor. The prophet hopes from the morning watch until night: he has no idle time; he is an untiring worker of the whole day.
129.11CSEL 22:656–657
Sed quid tandem erit spei? non omnium uita diem suam in spe domini exigit; sunt enim operarii horae tertiae. sunt sextae, sunt nonae, sunt et undecimae: et uidetur propheta, qui a custodia matutina usque in noctem sperauit, spem nobis euangelicae mercedis abscindere. non abscindit plane. ait enim: speret Israhel in domino. sine praefinitione temporis spei adhortatio est. ille quidem, ut perfectus operarius, a custodia matutina usque in noctem sperauit. sed ad spem omne tempus est liberum: et mercedem non operis, sed misericordiae undecimae horae operarii consequentur. ita enim ait: speret Israhel in domino: quia apud dominum misericordia et copiosa apud eum redemptio. et ipse redimet Israhel ex omnibus iniquitatibus eorum. bonus est, in quem speratur; et sperandum in eo est, quia misericordia est, quia copiosa apud eum redemptio est, quia redimet ab iniquitatibus suis uniuersos. hora undecima est, conclusa sunt diei tempora: curramus omnes, festinemus, ne nox adsit, ne hora praetereat. senes sumus, nox mortis insistit: ne ad undecimam saltem uitae nostrae horam procedimus? beatus quidem, qui a mane usque in noctem laborans pactum denarium tamquam debitum postulat; sed, quia bonus est dominus, quia misericors est, speremus in eum, ut, undecimae licet horae operarii, diurni laboris denarium consequamur per dominum nostrum Iesum Christum, qui est benedictus in saecula saeculorum. amen.
But what, then, will there be for hope? Not everyone's life spends its whole day in hope of the Lord; for there are workers of the third hour, of the sixth, of the ninth, and of the eleventh. And the prophet, who hoped from the morning watch until night, seems to cut off from us the hope of the Gospel reward. He plainly does not cut it off. For he says: "Let Israel hope in the Lord." The exhortation to hope is without a fixed limit of time. He indeed, as a perfect worker, hoped from the morning watch until night; but all time is open for hope, and the workers of the eleventh hour will obtain a reward not of their work but of mercy. For thus he says: "Let Israel hope in the Lord, for with the Lord is mercy, and with him abundant redemption; and he will redeem Israel from all their iniquities." He is good in whom we hope; and we must hope in him, because there is mercy, because with him is abundant redemption, because he will redeem all from their iniquities. It is the eleventh hour; the times of the day are closing; let us all run, let us hurry, lest night come, lest the hour pass. We are old; the night of death presses on: shall we not at least come forward at the eleventh hour of our life? Blessed indeed is he who, laboring from morning until night, claims the agreed denarius as due; but, because the Lord is good, because he is merciful, let us hope in him, so that, though workers of the eleventh hour, we may obtain the denarius of the day's labor through our Lord Jesus Christ, who is blessed for ever and ever. Amen.
Tractates 130
130.1CSEL 22:657
Breuis psalmus est et distinctione magis quam tractatu explicandus, ad humilitatem nos et mansuetudinem docens. et quia plurimis aliis locis nonnulla de humilitate tractauimus, otiosum est eadem repetere. certe meminisse debemus maximum fidei nostrae opus esse humilitatem, cum hanc pro optimi operis conscientia propheta commemoret dicens: domine, non est exaltatum cor meum. optimum enim sacrificium deo cor contribulatum. non ergo cor secundis rebus efferendum est, sed dei metu intra mansuetudinis fines humilitate cohibendum.
The psalm is short and is to be explained by distinguishing its parts rather than by a treatise; it teaches us humility and meekness. And since we have treated something of humility in very many other places, it would be idle to repeat the same things. Certainly we ought to remember that humility is the greatest work of our faith, since the prophet mentions it as his consciousness of the best work, saying: "Lord, my heart has not been lifted up." For the best sacrifice to God is a contrite heart. The heart, then, must not be carried away by prosperity, but held in by humility, through the fear of God, within the bounds of meekness.
130.2CSEL 22:657–658
Neque elati sunt oculi mei. alia istud proprietate grsecitas elocuta est dicens: οὐδὲ ἐμετεωρίσθησαν οἱ ὀφθαλμοί μου, id est non ex alio in aliud elati sunt. eleuandi autem oculi secundum dicta prophetae sunt: eleuate oculos uestros et uidete, quis ostendit haec omnia. et dominus in euangelio ait: eleuate oculos uestros et conspicite regiones, quia albae sunt ad messem. eleuandi ergo sunt oculi; sed non rursum in aliud eleuandi, ut semel in id quod elati sunt perseuerent.
"Nor have my eyes been lifted up." The Greek has expressed this with a different shade of meaning, saying οὐδὲ ἐμετεωρίσθησαν οἱ ὀφθαλμοί μου, that is, they have not been lifted up from one thing to another. Yet the eyes are to be lifted up, according to the sayings of the prophet: "Lift up your eyes and see who has shown all these things." And the Lord says in the Gospel: "Lift up your eyes and look at the fields, for they are white for harvest." The eyes, then, are to be lifted up; but not lifted again toward something else, so that they may persevere in that to which they have once been lifted.
130.3CSEL 22:658
Dehinc sequitur: neque ambulaui in magnis neque in mirabilibus super me. magni periculi res est si in modicis ambulamus et si non in mirabilibus demoramur. magna eloquia dei sunt, ipse mirabilis in excelsis est: et quomodo tamquam bonum opus de se propheta praefert, quod in magnis et mirabilibus non ambulet? sed cum addidit: super me, in his non ambulat, quse in hominibus mirabilia et magna creduntur. Dauid enim, et propheta et rex, erat humilis antea et abiectus neque conuiuio patris sui dignus; sed deo conplacuit, unctus in regem est, adspiratus est in prophetam. non insolescit in regno, non odiis commouetur: persequentes se amat. inimicorum mortes honorat, incestuosis et parricidalibus filiis parcit. imperator contemnitur, pater laeditur, propheta uexatur: ultionem non ut propheta orat, uindictam non ut pater sumit. contumeliam non ut imperator exsequitur. in his ergo, quae super se magna et mirabilia sunt, non ambulat.
Then follows: "Nor have I walked in great things, nor in wonderful things above me." It is a matter of great danger if we walk in small things and do not dwell in wonderful things. The words of God are great; he himself is wonderful on high: how, then, does the prophet put forward as a good work of his own that he does not walk in great and wonderful things? But when he added "above me," he does not walk in those things that are believed great and wonderful among men. For David, both prophet and king, was formerly lowly and cast aside, not worthy even of his father's feast; but he pleased God, was anointed king, was inspired as prophet. He does not grow insolent in his kingship; he is not moved by hatreds: he loves those who persecute him, honors the deaths of his enemies, spares his incestuous and parricidal sons. As emperor he is despised, as father he is wronged, as prophet he is harassed: he does not pray for vengeance as a prophet, does not take revenge as a father, does not punish an insult as an emperor. In these things, then, which are great and wonderful above him, he does not walk.
130.4CSEL 22:658–659
Sed uideamus, quse secuntur. si non humiliter sentiebam, sed exaltaui animam meam. quae prophetae ista diuersitas est? non exaltat cor: exaltat animam. non in magnis et mirabilibus super se ambulat: sed non humiliter sentit. excelsus animo est: et corde summissus est. humilis in suis est: sed non humilis in sensu est. sensus enim eius in caelum est, anima eius est in excelsis. cor autem, ex quo secundum euangelium exeunt cogitationes malae, homicidia, adulteria, fornicationes, furta, falsa testimonia, blasphemise, humile est, suaui illo mansuetudinis iugo subditum est. tenendus ergo humilitatis et altitudinis modus est, ut corde humiles, sensu uero et anima simus excelsi.
But let us see what follows: "If I did not think humbly, but exalted my soul." What is this contrast in the prophet? He does not exalt his heart; he exalts his soul. He does not walk in great and wonderful things above him; but he does not think humbly. He is lofty in soul and lowly in heart. He is humble in his own affairs, but not humble in thought. For his thought is toward heaven, his soul is on high. But the heart, out of which, according to the Gospel, come evil thoughts, murders, adulteries, acts of sexual immorality, thefts, false witness, blasphemies, is humble and subject to that sweet yoke of meekness. The measure of humility and loftiness must be kept, then: that we be humble in heart, but lofty in thought and soul.
130.5CSEL 22:659
Dehinc sequitur: sicut ablactatum super matrem suam, ita retribues in animam meam. ablactato Isaac accepimus Abraham fecisse cenam, quod ablactatus iam puerili aetati proximus cibum excederet. apostolus omnes rudes fidei et infantilis adhuc in dei rebus scientiae lacte potat. ergo profectus maximus est, iam lacte non indigere. ad fortiorem enim cibum transisse filium suum Abraham etiam conuiuii laetitia testatus est, et apostolus carnalibus et paruulis in Christo panem negat. propheta itaque orat, quia non exaltauerit cor suum, quia non in magnis et mirabilibus suis ambulauerit, quia non humilia senserit, sed exaltauerit animam suam, uti tamquam ablactato super matrem suam retribuatur animae eius: scilicet ut perfecti et caelestis et uiuentis panis retributione sit dignus, quia per superiora, quae commemorauit, opera cibum iam lactis excesserit.
Then follows: "As one weaned upon his mother, so will you repay my soul." We have learned that when Isaac was weaned Abraham made a feast, because, being weaned and now near boyhood, he went beyond the food of infancy. The apostle gives milk to drink to all who are untrained in the faith and still infantile in knowledge of the things of God. It is the greatest progress, then, no longer to need milk. For Abraham testified even by the joy of a feast that his son had passed to stronger food, and the apostle denies bread to those who are carnal and little ones in Christ. The prophet therefore prays, because he has not exalted his heart, because he has not walked in his own great and wonderful things, because he has not thought lowly things but has exalted his soul, that his soul may be repaid as one weaned upon his mother: namely, that he may be worthy of the reward of the perfect, heavenly, and living bread, because through the works he mentioned above he has now gone beyond the food of milk.
130.6CSEL 22:659–660
Sed neque sibi tantum hunc uiuum e caelis panem precatur, uniuersos autem ad huius spem adhortatur dicens: speret Israhel in domino ex hoc et usque in saeculum saeculi. spem nostram nullo fine temporum claudit, in inmensum expectationis nostrae fidem tendit. in saeculum saeculi sperandum est: per spem praesentis saeculi spem futuri saeculi consequentes in domino nostro Iesu Christo, qui est benedictus in saecula saeculorum. amen.
But he does not pray for this living bread from heaven only for himself; he exhorts all to the hope of it, saying: "Let Israel hope in the Lord from this time forth and for ever and ever." He closes our hope with no end of time; he stretches the faith of our expectation into the boundless. We must hope for ever and ever, attaining through the hope of the present age the hope of the age to come, in our Lord Jesus Christ, who is blessed for ever and ever. Amen.
Tractates 131
131.1CSEL 22:660–661
Omnes quidem anteriores psalmi graduum in profectum nos spei celsioris extollunt et per doctrinam fidei, spei, confessionis, humilitatis, orationis in sublime gradibus suis prouehunt. sed hic praecipue psalmus nos ad cognitionem filii dei edocet et sacramento adsumptse ab eo carnis instituit. coepit enim ita: memento, domine, Dauid et omnis mansuetudinis eius. audent Iudaei aduentum domini nostri, quo corpore salutem humano generi reddidit, abnegantes hunc psalmum ad Dauid referre, ut in passione domini impii, ita et in prophetiae scientia inperiti; legentes et non intellegentes, habentes et nescientes, uenerantes et non oboedientes. qua enim religionis simulatione prophetarum libros uenerentur, multis cognitum est. contrectare legentes manu non audent. linteo substernunt, ad fidem sacramenti testes eos adhibent: et hoc eo proficit, ut maiore inreligiositatis crimine eorum, quibus tantus honos debetur, dicta aut contemnant aut dissimulent aut nesciant. hoc eo dictum est, quia, cum in prophetis longe postea, quam Dauid corpore excesserat, scriptum habeant in Hieremia ita: in illa die, dicit dominus, contribulabo iugum a ceruice eorum et uincula eorum disrumpam, et non operabuntur ipsi adhuc aliis, operabuntur domino deo suo, et Dauid regem ipsorum suscitabo illis; et rursum: suscitabo illis Dauid regem, orientem, iustum, et regnabit rex et intelleget et faciet iustitiam et iudicium super terram: in diebus eius saluabitur Iudas, et Israhel commorabitur fidens; item in Esaia: et excitabo super eos pastorem unum altum, pascet eos seruus meus Dauid: et erit his pastor, et ego ero illis in deum, et Dauid princeps in medio eorum; ego dominus locutus sum et disponam ad Dauid testamentum pacis, nolunt credere, quod docentur, neque his fidem habent, quibus deberi uenerationem confitentur. et religiosi quomodo erunt auctoritatem abnegantes religioni?
All the earlier psalms of ascents raise us toward progress in a loftier hope and carry us upward by their steps through the teaching of faith, hope, confession, humility, and prayer. But this psalm above all instructs us in the knowledge of the Son of God and trains us in the mystery of the flesh he assumed. For it begins thus: "Remember, O Lord, David and all his meekness." The Jews, denying the coming of our Lord, in which by a body he restored salvation to the human race, dare to refer this psalm to David, as impious in the Lord's passion as they are unskilled in the knowledge of prophecy: reading and not understanding, possessing and not knowing, venerating and not obeying. For with what pretense of religion they venerate the books of the prophets is known to many. When reading them they do not dare to touch them with the hand; they lay a linen cloth beneath them; they call them as witnesses to the faith of an oath; and the result of this is that, with the greater crime of irreligion, they either despise or ignore or do not know the sayings of those to whom so great an honor is due. This is said because, although they have written in the prophets, long after David had departed from the body, in Jeremiah thus: "In that day, says the Lord, I will break the yoke from their neck and burst their bonds, and they shall no longer serve others; they shall serve the Lord their God, and I will raise up David their king for them"; and again: "I will raise up for them David the king, a rising, a righteous one, and the king shall reign and understand and do justice and judgment on the earth; in his days Judah shall be saved, and Israel shall dwell confidently"; likewise in Isaiah: "And I will raise up over them one shepherd on high; my servant David shall feed them, and he shall be their shepherd, and I will be their God, and David prince in their midst; I the Lord have spoken, and I will make with David a covenant of peace": they will not believe what they are taught, nor do they put faith in those to whom they confess veneration is due. And how will they be religious who deny authority to religion?
131.2CSEL 22:661–662
Dauid cum patribus quiescebat, ipse testamentum datae per Moysen legis cognouerat; tanto postea deus per prophetas locutus est Dauid excitandum, pastorem, regem, orientem, iustum, in cuius diebus salus Israhel sit, ad quem deus testamentum pacis disponet. ergo est Dauid non hic Iessae filius, psalmorum ex parte conscriptor, sed Dauid ob custodiam gregis sui pastor: pastor enim bonus pro ouibus suis animam ponit, ob aeterni regni gloriam rex, cui dictum est: Rabbi, tu es rex Israhel, ob iudicium iustus: pater enim non iudicat quemquam, sed omne iudicium dedit filio, ob lumen mundi oriens: est enim lux uera, quae lucificat omnem hominem uenientem in hunc mundum, ob filii dignitatem testamenti pacis heres: omnia enim mihi data sunt in caelo et in terra et: pacem meam relinquo uobis. confiteantur ergo necesse est Iudaei, longe post Dauid tempora esse haec praedicata. est autem Dauid iste, qui nomen parentis secundum originem carnis accepit: nomen sumens eius, cuius ex genere sumebat et corpus. omnia autem, quae psalmo continentur, et a gestis prophetae Dauid et a natura humanae infirmitatis et ab aetatis temporibus diuersa sunt. et quia ei non res, non condicio, non tempus aptatur. et in eum Dauid, quem postea deus per prophetas pollicitus est, conueniunt, non est ambiguum, quin etiam hic, qui propheta egregius et magnus est, de eo Dauid, qui postea extitit, dei spiritu, prophetae officio sit locutus.
David was resting with his fathers; he himself had known the covenant of the law given through Moses; so long afterward God spoke through the prophets of a David to be raised up, shepherd, king, rising, righteous, in whose days would be the salvation of Israel, with whom God would make a covenant of peace. This David, then, is not the son of Jesse, the writer of part of the psalms, but David: shepherd because of the guarding of his flock, for the good shepherd lays down his life for his sheep; king because of the glory of an eternal kingdom, he to whom it was said, "Rabbi, you are the king of Israel"; righteous because of judgment, for the Father judges no one but has given all judgment to the Son; rising because of the light of the world, for he is the true light that enlightens every man coming into this world; heir of the covenant of peace because of the dignity of the Son, for "all things have been given to me in heaven and on earth," and "My peace I leave you." The Jews, then, must confess that these things were proclaimed long after the times of David. And this is the David who received the name of his ancestor according to the origin of the flesh, taking the name of him from whose line he was also taking a body. But everything contained in the psalm differs from the deeds of the prophet David, from the nature of human weakness, and from the times of his life. And since neither the events, nor the condition, nor the time fit him, while they agree with that David whom God afterward promised through the prophets, there is no doubt that this outstanding and great prophet too spoke, by the Spirit of God and in the office of a prophet, of that David who came afterward.
131.3CSEL 22:662–663
Ait enim: memento, domine, Dauid et omnis mansuetudinis eius. non ait: memento mei, sed: memento, domine, Dauid, ut alterum, qui loqueretur, ostenderet. orationem autem omnem hanc esse unigeniti dei filii per prophetam loquentis existimari necesse est, memoriam dei patris erga eum, sibi quem adsumpturus erat, hominem deprecantis. est enim nunc Iesus secundum apostolum in gloria dei patris, et ei omne caelestium et terrestrium et infernorum genu flectit. ergo se primogenitus dei filius, deus uerbum, iam Dauid nuncupat per prophetae orationem eius sibi hominis nomen adsumens, qui secundum diuinitatis suae priuilegium una secum esset in patris gloria collocandus. memento, domine, Dauid et omnis mansuetudinis eius; ait enim ipse: quia mansuetus et humilis corde sum. et testimonium de eo patris est: ecce puer meus, quem elegi, dilectus meus; in quo conplacuit anima mea: ponam spiritum meum super eum, et iudicium gentibus nuntiabit. non contendet neque clamabit, neque audiet aliquis in plateis uocem eius. ut omnis ergo huius mansuetudinis pater meminerit deprecatur, per cuius mansuetudinis modestiam deo patri officium humilitatis suae uouerit.
For he says: "Remember, O Lord, David and all his meekness." He does not say "remember me," but "remember, O Lord, David," to show that another was speaking. We must judge that this whole prayer belongs to the only-begotten Son of God speaking through the prophet, asking God the Father's remembrance toward the man whom he was to assume. For Jesus is now, according to the apostle, in the glory of God the Father, and every knee of things in heaven, on earth, and under the earth bends to him. So the firstborn Son of God, God the Word, now calls himself David through the prophet's prayer, taking for himself the name of that man of his who, according to the privilege of his divinity, was to be placed together with him in the Father's glory. "Remember, O Lord, David and all his meekness": for he himself says, "For I am meek and humble of heart." And the Father's testimony of him is: "Behold my servant, whom I have chosen, my beloved, in whom my soul is well pleased; I will put my Spirit upon him, and he will announce judgment to the nations. He will not quarrel nor cry out, nor will anyone hear his voice in the streets." He prays, then, that the Father may remember all this meekness, through whose modest meekness he vowed to God the Father the service of his humility.
131.4CSEL 22:663–664
Sicut, inquit, iurauit domino, uotum uouit deo Iacob. sacramenti mentio ad professionem uoluntatis adsumitur. et nescio, an unigenitus iurauerit. certe ita et gessit et locutus est omnia, ut sacramenti religioni satisfacere uideretur. namque cum quaedam de passione sua locutus ad discipulos suos fuisset et Petrus tamquam indignum hoc dei filio detestatus esset, Petrum, cui superius claues regni caelorum dederat, super quem ecclesiam aedificaturus erat, aduersus quam portae inferi nihil praeualerent, qui quae in terris soluisset uel ligasset, ea in caelis uel soluta persisterent uel ligata, hunc itaque tali conuicio detestantem hoc sacramentum passionis excepit: uade retro post me, satanas, scandalum mihi es. tanta ei religio fuit pro humani generis salute patiendi, ut Petrum, primum filii dei confessorem, ecclesiae fundamentum, caelestis regni ianitorem et in terreno iudicio iudicem caeli, satanae conuicio nuncuparet. quin etiam in tumultu eo, quo se dedendum passioni praebuerat, cum idem Petrus seruo sacerdotis gladio aurem abscidisset, ait: reconde gladium tuum in theca: calicem, quem dedit mihi pater, non bibam illum? impium et profanum docens esse, si non omnia, quse erga humanam salutem patri uouisset, expleret. absolute autem in eo ostendit deuotam passionis suae religionem, cum post aceti poculum esset spiritum traditurus; perfectis enim omnibus ait: consummatum est, et inclinans caput tradidit spiritum. percucurrerat enim omnia sacramenti officia: et ubi consummatione gaudetur, ibi in suscepti operis perfectione laetitia est. ergo quia secundum hanc gestorum deuotionem ita omnia acta sunt, ut uideantur studiose pro religione, qua iurata sunt, esse perfecta, sequens est, ut uideatur, quid sit, quod Dauid iste et iurauit et uouit.
"As he swore to the Lord," it says, "he vowed a vow to the God of Jacob." Mention of an oath is used to declare the will. And I do not know whether the Only-begotten swore. Certainly he so acted and spoke in everything that he seemed to satisfy the religious obligation of an oath. For when he had spoken to his disciples about his passion, and Peter had rejected this as unworthy of the Son of God, he answered with such a rebuke Peter, to whom he had earlier given the keys of the kingdom of heaven, on whom he was to build the church against which the gates of hell would not prevail, whose loosing or binding on earth would remain loosed or bound in heaven: him, then, rejecting this mystery of the passion, he answered: "Get behind me, Satan; you are a stumbling block to me." So great was his religious obligation to suffer for the salvation of the human race that he called Peter, the first confessor of the Son of God, the foundation of the church, the doorkeeper of the heavenly kingdom, and in earthly judgment the judge of heaven, by the reproach of "Satan." Moreover, in that tumult in which he had offered himself to be handed over to the passion, when the same Peter had cut off the ear of the priest's servant with a sword, he said: "Put your sword back into its sheath: the cup the Father has given me, shall I not drink it?" teaching that it would be impious and profane if he did not fulfil all that he had vowed to the Father for human salvation. He showed absolutely the vowed obligation of his passion when he was about to give up his spirit after the cup of vinegar; for, all things being completed, he said: "It is finished," and bowing his head he gave up his spirit. For he had run through all the duties of his oath; and where there is rejoicing in completion, there is gladness in the perfecting of the work undertaken. Since, then, according to this devotion in his deeds, everything was so done that it seems to have been accomplished zealously for the religious obligation under which it was sworn, it follows that we should see what it is that this David both swore and vowed.
131.5CSEL 22:664–666
Si intrabo in tabernaculum domus meae et si ascendero in lectum strati mei, si dedero somnum oculis meis et palpebris meis dormitationem et requiem temporibus meis, donec inueniam locum domino, tabernaculum deo Iacob. humanae naturae uota haec esse non possunt, et condicio sacramenti infirmitatem terrenae necessitatis excedit. adeundum tabernaculum domus non est, strato lecti abstinendum est, somnus oculis et palpebris dormitatio et requies temporibus non danda est, donec cum inueniatur domino locus et tabernaculum deo Iacob. standum ergo erit nocte dieque sub caelo, et numquam in requiem corpus iacebit; oculi autem semper uigiles laborabunt, et ne ipsis quidem palpebris coniuendi in dormitationem permittetur obductio. tempora uero, quae maxime in toto capite et corpore iniuriis uigilise et stationis obnoxia sunt, requiem non habebunt, homo istud de se iurare non sinitur; etiamsi maxime nolit, condicionem tamen uoti huius pro ipsa naturae suae necessitate uiolabit. uigilet licet animus et corpus in statione contineat, tamen necesse est infirmitatis dominante natura et procidat et dormiat et requiescat inuitus. dehinc quem locum homo deo inueniet et inconprehensibilem infinitamque naturam quali tabernaculo continebit? cum de se ipse per prophetam deus locutus sit dicens: caelum mihi thronus est, terra autem scamellum pedum meorum: quam domum aedificabitis mihi aut quis locus requietionis meae? omnia enim haec fecit manus mea, et mea sunt omnia haec. non ignarus autem huius diuinae uocis propheta est et scit humanae et terrenae operationis domum deo esse non posse, idipsum psalmo anteriore contestans, cum ait: nisi dominus sedificauerit domum, in uanum laborauerunt, qui aedificant eam. ergo si neque natura hominis condicionem uoti istius recipit, neque locum et tabernaculum deo humana requirit operatio, cognoscendum est per scripturarum caelestium auctoritatem. quod sit hoc uotum, per cuius satisfactionem locus domino, et deo Iacob tabernaculum sit repertum.
"If I enter the tent of my house, and if I go up to the bed of my couch, if I give sleep to my eyes and slumber to my eyelids and rest to my temples, until I find a place for the Lord, a tent for the God of Jacob." These cannot be the vows of human nature, and the condition of the oath exceeds the weakness of earthly necessity. The tent of his house is not to be entered, the couch of his bed is to be refrained from; sleep to the eyes, slumber to the eyelids, and rest to the temples are not to be given until a place is found for the Lord and a tent for the God of Jacob. He will have to stand, then, night and day under the sky, and his body will never lie down to rest; his eyes will toil, always wakeful, and not even the closing of the eyelids in slumber will be allowed. And the temples, which more than anything in the whole head and body are exposed to the harms of watching and standing, will have no rest. A man is not permitted to swear this about himself; even if he utterly does not want to, he will still break the condition of this vow through the very necessity of his nature. Let the mind keep watch and hold the body at its post, yet, since the nature of weakness prevails, it must fall, sleep, and rest against its will. Then, what place will a man find for God, and in what kind of tent will he contain an incomprehensible and infinite nature? For God himself spoke through the prophet about himself, saying: "Heaven is my throne, and the earth the footstool of my feet: what house will you build for me, or what is the place of my rest? For my hand made all these things, and all these things are mine." The prophet is not unaware of this divine utterance and knows that a house of human and earthly workmanship cannot belong to God, testifying to this very thing in the previous psalm when he says: "Unless the Lord build the house, they have labored in vain who build it." If, then, neither does man's nature admit the condition of this vow, nor does human workmanship find a place and tent for God, we must learn through the authority of the heavenly Scriptures what this vow is, by whose fulfilment a place has been found for the Lord and a tent for the God of Jacob.
131.6CSEL 22:666–667
Domino nostro Iesu Christo unigenito dei filio, qui omnia humanae salutis sacramenta tamquam iuratus expleuit et quem a prophetis Dauid significatum docuimus, hoc opus maximum fuit, ut hominem ad scientiam diuinam eruditum dignum habitaculo dei redderet. et esse hominem sedem atque habitationem deo ita docemur, deo ipso per prophetam loquente: quia inhabitabo in his et illis ambulabo et ero illorum deus, et ipsi erunt mihi populus, et rursum: exultabunt, et inhabitabo in illis. dominus autem ipse in euangelio ait: si quis diligit me, et uerbum meum seruabit, et pater meus diliget eum, et ueniemus et mansionem apud eum faciemus. apostolus quoque ait: uos estis templum dei, et spiritus dei habitat in uobis. habitat autem deus religiosorum mentes non corporali habitu neque naturae grauioris ingressu, ut alibi non degens illic tantum, quo se intulerit, insistat: sed spiritali uirtute in uacua se a terrenis labibus corda permittit seseque luminis modo in patentes innocentiae foribus mentes inluminaturus infundit. adsumpto igitur corpore unigenitus deus neque ante se cum homine suo ingressurum tabernaculum domus suae iurat, id est in caelestem habitationem suam esse rediturum, quam haec religiosi pectoris loca domino inueniat.
For our Lord Jesus Christ, the only-begotten Son of God, who fulfilled all the mysteries of human salvation as one under oath, and whom we have shown to be signified by the prophets as David, this was the greatest work: to make man, instructed in divine knowledge, worthy to be a dwelling of God. And that man is the seat and dwelling of God we are taught thus, God himself speaking through the prophet: "For I will dwell in them and walk among them, and I will be their God, and they shall be my people"; and again: "... they will exult, and I will dwell in them." And the Lord himself says in the Gospel: "If anyone loves me, he will also keep my word, and my Father will love him, and we will come and make our abode with him." The apostle too says: "You are the temple of God, and the Spirit of God dwells in you." God dwells in the minds of the religious not by a bodily presence nor by the entry of a heavier nature, so as to be absent elsewhere and to remain only where he has entered, but by spiritual power he lets himself into hearts emptied of earthly stains, and pours himself, like light, into minds whose doors stand open to innocence, to enlighten them. Having assumed a body, therefore, the only-begotten God swears that he will not enter the tent of his house with his man, that is, return to his heavenly dwelling, before he finds for the Lord these places of the religious heart.
131.7CSEL 22:667
Sed neque stratum lecti sui ascensurum se esse uouit. stratum requies humanorum laborum est et fessorum corporum refectio. sed in caelo semper quiescitur et, quia indefessa illa natura laborem nescit, semper in strato, id est semper est in quiete. dominus noster in forma dei manens formam serui accepit et oboediens usque ad mortem fuit, et mortem crucis, ut plus nescio quid morte pateretur. ob id autem tantum oboediens usque ad crucis mortem est, ut nos habitatione dei dignos esse praestaret. mori igitur uoluit, qui uita est, et effici se indefessa uirtus ad habitationem corporis non recusauit infirmam, ut in forma dei manens formam serui acciperet. excessit ergo ex illo aeternae beatitudinis suae strato. et testis nobis quadragensimus psalmus est, qui ex persona domini omne sacramentum passionis eloquitur dicens: uniuersum stratum suum uersasti in infirmitate eius. cum per oboedientiam uoluntatis paternae ex deo homo, ex potente infirmus, ex uiuificante mortuus, ex aeterno saeculorum iudice crucis reus dicitur, tum stratum eius in infirmitate conuertitur. in illud igitur aeternae et beatae quietis stratum uouit, nisi reperto dei tabernaculo, non redire, sed nec ante somnum oculis suis dare.
Nor did he vow that he would go up to the couch of his bed. A couch is the rest of human labors and the refreshment of tired bodies. But in heaven there is always rest, and because that untiring nature knows no labor, it is always on its couch, that is, always at rest. Our Lord, remaining in the form of God, took the form of a servant and was obedient unto death, even the death of the cross, so as to suffer something, I know not what, more than death. And he was obedient so far as the death of the cross only in order to make us worthy of God's dwelling. He who is life, then, willed to die, and untiring power did not refuse to be made a weak bodily dwelling, so that, remaining in the form of God, he might take the form of a servant. He went out, then, from that couch of his eternal blessedness. And the fortieth psalm is our witness, which in the person of the Lord speaks the whole mystery of the passion, saying: "You have turned his whole couch in his weakness." When, through obedience to the Father's will, he is said to be man from God, weak from mighty, dead from life-giving, a criminal of the cross from eternal judge of the ages, then his couch is turned in weakness. He vowed, then, not to return to that couch of eternal and blessed rest unless the tent of God had been found, nor even to give sleep to his eyes before then.
131.8CSEL 22:667–669
Quis iste est somnus? nempe ille, de quo ait: ego dormiui et somnum cepi et surrexi, quoniam dominus suscipiet me. mortis hic somnus est, quem non ante oculis suis dabit, quam locum habitationis inueniat. huius etiam somni beatus patriarcha Iacob in benedictione Iudae, qui princeps gentis istius extitit, meminit dicens: catulus leonis Iuda, ex frutice filius meus, procidens dormisti ut leo et sicut catulus leonis. quis suscitabit eum? et superior et consequens benedictio nec aetati Iudae nec gestis conuenit, sed ei, qui ex Iudae frutice sicuti ex radice Iessae est, qui et catulus leonis est et Iacob erit filius. ex hac enim Iudae tribu Maria est, quae domini nostri secundum carnem mater fuit. hic ergo procidens dormiuit ut leo. leo terror est feris omnibus et ueluti dominans est ceterarum bestiarum: et hic solus per confidentiam et securitatem dormit intrepidus. terror omnium uigilans est, ipse autem securus in somno est. et idcirco addidit: quis suscitabit eum, quia intrepidse et praepotentis naturae securitatem nulla externi terroris timiditas inquietet. ne ergo quicquam humile atque passibile inpassibilem unigeniti dei substantiam perpessam existimaremus in ea morte, quam subiit, ferae huius intrepide dormientis exemplum ad securae mortis intellegentiam est relatum: ut extra humani timoris esse in somno illo inquietudinem doceretur, qui per generis sui naturaeque uirtutem, dormiens licet, timere non posset. seruata autem diligentissime ea ratio est, ut in unigenito deo aeterni et gignentis eum dei gloria nosceretur, cum dicitur: sicut leo et sicut catulus leonis. ad id enim, quod ex deo ipse subsistit, catulus est leonis: ad id uero, quod leo est, paternae in eo maiestatis indifferens generositas praedicatur. ut unum ambo sint, leo est: ne unus atque ipse sit, catulus leonis est.
What is this sleep? Surely that of which he says: "I slept and took sleep and rose up, for the Lord will sustain me." This sleep is that of death, which he will not give to his eyes until he finds a place of dwelling. The blessed patriarch Jacob also recalls this sleep in the blessing of Judah, who became the prince of that nation, saying: "A lion's whelp is Judah; from a shoot, my son, lying down you slept like a lion and like a lion's whelp. Who will rouse him?" Both the preceding and the following blessing fit neither the life nor the deeds of Judah, but him who is from the shoot of Judah as he is from the root of Jesse, who is both a lion's whelp and will be Jacob's son. For from this tribe of Judah is Mary, who was the mother of our Lord according to the flesh. He, then, lying down, slept like a lion. The lion is a terror to all wild animals and as it were the master of the other beasts; and he alone, from confidence and security, sleeps without fear. Awake, he is the terror of all; but he himself is secure in sleep. And therefore he added, "Who will rouse him?", because no timidity of outside terror can disturb the security of a fearless and all-powerful nature. Lest, then, we should think that the impassible substance of the only-begotten God suffered anything lowly and passible in the death he underwent, the example of this beast sleeping without fear was brought in to make us understand a secure death: so that it might be taught that he was beyond the disquiet of human fear in that sleep, since by the power of his kind and nature he could not fear, even though he slept. And the reasoning has been most carefully kept, so that in the only-begotten God the glory of the eternal God who begot him might be recognized, when it says: "like a lion and like a lion's whelp." In that he subsists from God, he is a lion's whelp; in that he is a lion, the undiminished nobility of the Father's majesty in him is proclaimed. That both may be one, he is a lion; lest he be one and the same person, he is a lion's whelp.
131.9CSEL 22:669
Id ipsum autem etiam psalmi consequentia demonstrant. ne enim indefessa illa uirtus et inpassibilis unigeniti dei natura mortis somno dormitatura existimaretur, rem omnem ad officium corporis, cui discessio inmortalis animae mors est, rettulit dicens: si dedero somnum oculis meis et palpebris meis dormitationem et requiem temporibus meis, donec inueniam locum domino, tabernaculum deo Iacob. "temporibus" secundum translationis fidem non aetatis spatiis, sed capitis partibus requiem negat. et hae adfectiones sunt corporales, quas labor longus et uitae anxietas exagitant. quieuit autem ille, cui mors somnus est: et id, quod nobis poenalis demutatio est, unigenito et in corpore manenti deo requies fuit.
The sequence of the psalm shows this very thing. Lest that untiring power and impassible nature of the only-begotten God should be thought to fall asleep in the sleep of death, he referred the whole matter to the function of the body, for which the departure of the immortal soul is death, saying: "If I give sleep to my eyes and slumber to my eyelids and rest to my temples, until I find a place for the Lord, a tent for the God of Jacob." "Temples," according to the faithfulness of the translation, denies rest not to spans of time but to parts of the head. And these are bodily conditions, which long labor and the anxiety of life disturb. But he rested for whom death is sleep; and what for us is a penal change was for the only-begotten God, even remaining in the body, a rest.
131.10CSEL 22:669–670
Sed ante hanc requiem et apostoli eliguntur et soluendi ac ligandi et in caelo et in terra ius sortiuntur et potestatem aduersus uirtutem omnem aduersariam sumunt et templum dei sunt et ipsi ex lege uenientes dignum deo Iacob tabernaculum sunt reperti. ac ne forte nos per multiplicem humani ingenii intellegentiam uim ueritati adferre quidam arbitrentur, ut, quod ex Dauid persona dictum sit, id ad dominum saluatoremque nostrum multimodis translationum subtilitatibus transferamus, contuenda sunt, quae secuntur, ut ex his ueritatem inuitis licet et renitentibus ingeramus. ait enim: ecce audiuimus eam in Ephrata, inuenimus eam in campis siluse; introibimus in tabernacula eius, adorabimus, ubi steterunt pedes eius. superius, ubi iuratur ac uouetur, uoti sacramentum non conuenire naturae humanae docuimus, quia tanti temporis uigilias labor terreni corporis recusaret. et nunc, ubi loca ipsa eorumque nomina commemorantur, ne quid in Dauid referri possit, ueritas ipsa et extantis hodie regionis fides contradicit. Dauid enim dispersum populum in regno suo habens, cui nulla religionis sedes esset, aream in Hierusalem coemit ad locum templi, ut illuc ad explenda legis sollemnia conueniretur. sed templum hoc filius eius Salomon aedificauit, ornauit et religionibus initiauit.
But before this rest the apostles are chosen, receive the right of loosing and binding both in heaven and on earth, take power against every opposing force, are the temple of God, and, coming themselves from the law, are found a worthy tent for the God of Jacob. And lest some should think that through the manifold ingenuity of human cleverness we do violence to the truth, transferring what was said in the person of David to our Lord and Savior by many subtleties of figurative interpretation, we must look at what follows, so that from it we may press the truth upon them, however unwilling and resisting. For it says: "Behold, we heard of it in Ephrata, we found it in the fields of the wood; we will enter into his tents, we will worship where his feet have stood." Above, where the swearing and vowing are, we showed that the oath of the vow does not fit human nature, since the toil of an earthly body would refuse watches of so long a time. And now, where the places themselves and their names are mentioned, the truth itself and the evidence of the region existing today contradict any reference to David. For David, having in his kingdom a scattered people with no seat of worship, bought a threshing floor in Jerusalem for the site of the temple, so that they might gather there to fulfil the solemnities of the law. But this temple his son Solomon built, adorned, and dedicated with its rites.
131.11CSEL 22:670–671
Volunt ergo Iudsei Dauid, areae huius coemptorem, peregrinationem a domo et uigiliarum iniuriam et laborem corporis, donec cum hunc locum et hoc tabernaculum deo Iacob posset inuenire, uouisse. sed hoc neque historia Regnorum aut Praeteritorum, in quibus Dauid gesta continentur, loquitur, neque psalmus admittit. et cur non admittat, in absoluto est. Dauid aream coemit; locus templi locus areae fuit, ubi fruges congestae, ubi tritae, ubi paleae tritico separandae sunt. requies autem domini in Ephrata est; et prius audita in Ephrata est et postea in campis siluae reperta. et quid commune Hierusalem et Ephrata? et quid areae ad siluae campos? nihil hic conueniens est, nihil non dissonans. aream, in qua requieuisse deus Iacob existimatur, nouissimis temporibus uentilabro dominus emundat: triticum eius horreis condit, paleas autem inextinguibili igne urit. probatos legis uiros apothecis dignos habet, inutiles et infructuosos igni iudicii deputat. templum illud hodie iam nullum est, incensum est, dirutum est, informe ruinis est: et ubi ergo dei requies est? mentitus propheta est, et inritum sacramenti ipsius uotum est? deus etenim requiem, quam ei se iuratus reperturum uouerat, amisit? itaque quia neque dei dignitati neque naturae hominis neque locorum ueritati neque temporum demutationi haec inreligiosarum opinionum figmenta conueniunt, ex istis nunc scripturarum caelestium auctoritatibus demonstrandum est ad personam domini Iesu Christi et ad ecclesise sanctificationem psalmum esse referendum.
The Jews, then, would have it that David, the buyer of this threshing floor, vowed absence from home, the harm of watching, and bodily toil until he could find this place and this tent for the God of Jacob. But neither the history of the Kingdoms nor that of the Chronicles, in which David's deeds are contained, says this, nor does the psalm admit it. And why it does not admit it is plain. David bought a threshing floor; the place of the temple was the place of a threshing floor, where the crops were heaped, where they were threshed, where the chaff was to be separated from the wheat. But the rest of the Lord is in Ephrata; and it was first heard of in Ephrata and afterward found in the fields of the wood. And what has Jerusalem in common with Ephrata? And what has a threshing floor to do with the fields of a wood? Nothing here fits; everything is discordant. The threshing floor on which the God of Jacob is thought to have rested, the Lord in the last times cleanses with the winnowing fan: he stores his wheat in barns but burns the chaff with unquenchable fire. He holds the approved men of the law worthy of the storehouses; the useless and fruitless he assigns to the fire of judgment. That temple today no longer exists; it has been burned, torn down, shapeless in ruins: where, then, is the rest of God? Did the prophet lie, and is the vow of his oath void? Has God lost the rest that he had sworn and vowed he would find for him? Since, therefore, these fictions of irreligious opinions fit neither the dignity of God, nor the nature of man, nor the truth of the places, nor the change of times, we must now show from these authorities of the heavenly Scriptures that the psalm is to be referred to the person of the Lord Jesus Christ and to the sanctification of the church.
131.12CSEL 22:671–672
Diximus superius, etiam hunc prophetam de Dauid illo iusto, pastore, rege, oriente, in psalmo isto prophetasse et ex persona eius locutum esse, cum dixit: si intrabo in tabernaculum domus meae, si ascendero in lectum strati mei, si dedero somnum oculis meis et palpebris meis dormitationem et requiem temporibus meis, donec inueniam locum domino, tabernaculum deo Iacob. nunc uero ut se uoti eius non ignarum neque inperitum esse propheta ostenderet, ex persona sua loquitur dicens: ecce audiuimus eam in Ephrata, inuenimus eam in campis siluae. superius, ubi sacramenti religio commemoratur, unus iurauit ac uouit. unus enim in forma dei manens formam serui accepit; et unus dominus Iesus Christus est, per quem omnia, uno deo patre, ex quo omnia. nunc autem ubi scientiae propheticae cognitio ostenditur, ex persona plurium dicitur: audiuimus eam in Ephrata, inuenimus eam in campis siluae, quia a pluribus requies domini prophetabatur.
We said above that this prophet too prophesied in this psalm about that David, righteous, shepherd, king, rising, and spoke in his person when he said: "If I enter the tent of my house, if I go up to the bed of my couch, if I give sleep to my eyes and slumber to my eyelids and rest to my temples, until I find a place for the Lord, a tent for the God of Jacob." But now, so that the prophet might show himself not ignorant or unskilled concerning his vow, he speaks in his own person, saying: "Behold, we heard of it in Ephrata, we found it in the fields of the wood." Above, where the religious obligation of the oath is mentioned, one swore and vowed. For one, remaining in the form of God, took the form of a servant; and there is one Lord Jesus Christ, through whom are all things, and one God the Father, from whom are all things. But now, where the knowledge of prophetic understanding is shown, it is said in the person of many: "We heard of it in Ephrata, we found it in the fields of the wood," because the rest of the Lord was prophesied by many.
131.13CSEL 22:672
Auditur itaque in Ephrata. Ephrata eadem est, quae Bethlem, in qua dominus natus ex Maria est. testis nobis est propheta dicens: et tu Bethlem, domus Ephrata, non minima es ut sis in milibus Iuda; ex te enim exiet, qui erit rex in Israhel; et rursum: et tu Bethlem Iudae non es minima inter principes Iuda; ex te enim exiet, qui regat populum meum Israhel. illic enim primum dei requies auditur, ubi primum unigenitus deus corpus humanae carnis habitauit; et quod in Ephrata auditur, in campis siluae inuenitur. initium itaque ecclesiae in Bethlem auditur; esse enim coepit a Christo; sed in gentibus reperitur. quae sunt ex siluis campi, ex horrentibus nitidae, ex sterilibus fructuosae, ex ignis pabulo uitalis cibi regio, ex ferarum cubilibus dei requies, domus, templum atque possessio. quod autem gentes tamquam siluae cubile diaboli fuerint, psalmus nobis septuagesimus nonus erit testis dicens: deuastauit eam aper de silua, et singularis ferus depastus est eam. illic enim de uinea sermo est, id est de dei, ut tunc putabatur, populo, quem infidelem et impium diabolus gentes inhabitans uastauerat. in his ergo campis siluae dei requies, quae in Ephrata audita est, inuenitur.
It is heard of, then, in Ephrata. Ephrata is the same as Bethlehem, in which the Lord was born of Mary. The prophet is our witness, saying: "And you, Bethlehem, house of Ephrata, are not least that you should be among the thousands of Judah; for from you shall come forth one who will be king in Israel"; and again: "And you, Bethlehem of Judah, are not least among the princes of Judah; for from you shall come forth one who will rule my people Israel." There first the rest of God is heard of, where first the only-begotten God dwelt in a body of human flesh; and what is heard of in Ephrata is found in the fields of the wood. So the beginning of the church is heard of in Bethlehem, for it began to exist from Christ; but it is found among the Gentiles, who are fields out of woods: bright out of bristling, fruitful out of barren, a region of life-giving food out of fodder for fire, God's rest, house, temple, and possession out of the lairs of wild beasts. That the Gentiles were like a wood, the lair of the devil, the seventy-ninth psalm will be our witness, saying: "The boar out of the wood has laid it waste, and the solitary wild beast has fed on it." There the speech is about the vine, that is, about what was then thought to be God's people, which the devil, dwelling in the Gentiles, had laid waste as unbelieving and impious. In these fields of the wood, then, is found the rest of God that was heard of in Ephrata.
131.14CSEL 22:672–673
Seruata autem temporum ratio est, ut, quod audiuimus et inuenimus, praeteritam significet aetatem, id autem, quod deinceps consequitur, spem futuri temporis doceat, cum ait: intrabimus in tabernacula eius, adorabimus, ubi steterunt pedes eius. corporali istud uitae praesentis officio propheta desperans fide et spiritu praesumit, ut in tabernacula requiei dei, quia ea et uidit et audiuit, introeat. sed superius super uno tantum tabernaculo iuratum est; nunc autem multa tabernacula introibunt. sunt enim ex una apostolorum ecclesia, de qua superius uotum est, plures ecclesiae et multa tabernacula: sed eadem dei requies in pluribus est. haec ergo requiei dei tabernacula introibunt; neque solum introibunt. sed etiam adorabunt, ubi steterunt pedes eius. cum statur in uno loco, ex quo decedi non oporteat, consistitur; ubi uero pedibus statur, illic toto corporis officio insistitur. lex praeteriit, prophetia clausa est. finis eorum Christus est, demutationis alterius locus nullus est: in hoc in aeternum standum est, ubi iam decursu legis et prophetarum dominus insistit. discurrit quidem per apostolos praedicatio. quos frequenter pedes significatos meminimus, sed in euangeliis consistitur. illic ergo adorabitur, ubi pedes domini, id est praedicationis nouissima sine demutationis alicuius transgressione constiterint.
The order of times has been kept, so that "we heard" and "we found" signify the past age, while what follows teaches the hope of the future, when it says: "We will enter into his tents, we will worship where his feet have stood." Despairing of this in the bodily function of the present life, the prophet anticipates by faith and in the Spirit that he will enter into the tents of God's rest, since he has both seen and heard them. But above the oath was about one tent only; now they will enter many tents. For from the one church of the apostles, about which the vow was made above, there are many churches and many tents; but the same rest of God is in many. These tents of God's rest, then, they will enter; and not only will they enter, but they will also worship where his feet have stood. When one stands in one place from which one must not depart, one takes a firm stand; and where one stands on one's feet, there one rests one's whole bodily weight. The law has passed away, prophecy is closed; their end is Christ; there is no room for any further change: in him we must stand for ever, where the Lord stands now that the law and the prophets have run their course. Preaching runs about, indeed, through the apostles, whom we remember are often signified as feet; but one takes one's stand in the Gospels. There, then, worship will be offered where the feet of the Lord, that is, the last of the preaching, have taken their stand without passing over into any change.
131.15CSEL 22:673–674
Et quia in euangeliis legimus dictum: multi prophetae et iusti cupierunt uidere, quae uos uidetis, et audire, quae auditis, sanctus propheta desiderii huius inpatiens est. postquam enim requiem dei audiuit et repperit, postquam introiturum se adoraturumque credidit, spei tantae fieri iam particeps deprecatur dicens: exsurge, domine, in requiem tuam, quam reperturum se Dauid tuus uouit, quam nos in Ephrata audiuimus, quam in campis siluae inuenimus, in cuius tabernacula introibimus adoraturi illic, ubi pedes tui steterunt. exsurge igitur in eam requiem, quae uoti sacramento quaesita est, quae prophetise scientia in loco audita est, quae gentium cultu frugifero reperta est, quae introeuntibus frequentabilis est, quae loco indemutabilis est, quae adorantium religione uenerabilis est.
And since we read in the Gospels the saying, "Many prophets and righteous men desired to see what you see and to hear what you hear," the holy prophet is impatient with this longing. For after he heard of and found God's rest, after he believed he would enter and worship, he prays to become a sharer of so great a hope at once, saying: "Arise, O Lord, into your rest," which your David vowed he would find, which we heard of in Ephrata, which we found in the fields of the wood, into whose tents we will enter to worship there where your feet have stood. Arise, then, into that rest which was sought by the oath of the vow, which was heard of in its place by the knowledge of prophecy, which was found by the fruitful cultivation of the Gentiles, which is thronged by those who enter, which is unchangeable in place, which is venerable by the devotion of those who worship.
131.16CSEL 22:674–675
Sed non solum tu, domine, exsurge in requiem tuam, sed et tu et arca sanctificationis tuae. non arca testamenti, non arca legis, sed arca sanctificationis tuae. et quidem esse arcam testamenti meminimus intus ac foris auream, ubi tabulae lapidum, ubi sanctae litterae, ubi liber testamenti, ubi gomor mannse. sed hsec omnia eius, quod dominus adsumpsit, corporis species est, omne in se sacramentum continens legis. nunc et deitatis spiritu et origine carnis unitum intus scilicet et foris aureum est — est enim dominus Iesus in gloria dei patris — mannam in se seternam continens — ipse enim est panis uiuus — testamenti intra se tabulas et legis librum conseruans — sunt enim in eo uerba uitae. ut igitur cum domino etiam haec sanctificationis arca — hunc enim deus secundum euangelia signauit pater requiem exsurgat, propheta orat. ceterum arca illa terrena et frequenter et ab allophylis capta est et polluta a regibus: et hodie templo atque urbe subuersa iam nulla est. et uideamus, quid sequatur.
But not only you, O Lord, arise into your rest, but "you and the ark of your sanctification." Not the ark of the covenant, not the ark of the law, but the ark of your sanctification. We remember indeed that there was an ark of the covenant, golden within and without, where the tablets of stone were, where the holy writing, where the book of the covenant, where the omer of manna. But all these are a figure of the body the Lord assumed, containing in itself the whole mystery of the law. Now, united both by the Spirit of deity and by the origin of the flesh, it is golden within and without, for the Lord Jesus is in the glory of God the Father; it contains the eternal manna within itself, for he himself is the living bread; it keeps within itself the tablets of the covenant and the book of the law, for in him are the words of life. The prophet prays, then, that together with the Lord this ark of sanctification too (for this one God the Father has sealed, according to the Gospels) may arise into rest. But that earthly ark was often captured by foreigners and defiled by kings; and today, with the temple and the city overthrown, it no longer exists. And let us see what follows.
131.17CSEL 22:675
Ait enim: sacerdotes tui induantur iustitiam, et sancti tui laetentur. induuntur, deo et arca sanctificationis eius in requiem resurgente, iustitia sacerdotes, ualidissimo, ut apostolus ait, thorace, induentes thoracem iustitiae, quo inimici iacula excipiant, quo internum hominem communiant; sancti autem laetentur. et uideamus causam, cur et sacerdotes iustitiam induant et sancti laetentur. ait enim: propter Dauid seruum tuum ne auertas faciem Christi tui. Christum ad deitatis spiritum rettulit, Dauid ad corporis carnem. formam enim serui, qui in forma dei manebat, accepit. ne igitur auertat a sacerdotibus atque sanctis Christi faciem, rogat: ut eos diuinitatis suae gloria, qui propter Dauid, id est propter adsumpti ab eo corporis sacramentum laetantur, inluminet.
For it says: "Let your priests be clothed with righteousness, and let your saints rejoice." When God and the ark of his sanctification rise again into rest, the priests are clothed with righteousness, the strongest breastplate, as the apostle says, putting on the breastplate of righteousness, with which to receive the enemy's darts and fortify the inner man; and the saints are to rejoice. And let us see the reason why the priests both put on righteousness and the saints rejoice. For it says: "For the sake of David your servant, do not turn away the face of your Christ." He referred "Christ" to the Spirit of deity, "David" to the flesh of the body. For he who remained in the form of God took the form of a servant. He asks, then, that he not turn away the face of Christ from the priests and saints, so that he may enlighten with the glory of his divinity those who rejoice for the sake of David, that is, for the sake of the mystery of the body he assumed.
131.18CSEL 22:675–676
Et cur propter Dauid seruum suum ne faciem Christi sui auertat, ostendit dicens: iurauit dominus Dauid ueritatem et non frustrabitur eum. dominus iurat et iurat ueritatem; dicti sui fidem etiam sacramento, ne ambigamus, adfirmat. non fraudabit igitur Dauid suum ueritate iurata. et quid ei iurauerit, dignum est contueri. de fructu uentris tui ponam super sedem meam. si custodierint fili tui testamentum meum et testimonia mea haec, quae docebo eos, et filii eorum usque in sseculum sedebunt super sedem tuam. quoniam elegit dominus Sion, praeelegit eam in habitationem sibi. haec requies mea in saecula saeculorum: hic habitabo, quoniam prseelegi eam. quid hic, quod Dauid sit proprium, continetur? urbs illa, quae generi eius fuit regia, capta a Babyloniis et euersa regni dignitatem sub dominantium iure non tenuit: post etiam a Romanis capta et incensa iam nulla est. et ubi dei requies in aeternum est? ubi ex fructu uentris eius in sede dei reges sunt? seruiunt enim hodie exules, patria carentes, toto in orbe dispersi. et ubi illa, quae iurata est, ueritas? ubi illud, quod non frustrandus est ueritate? et ubi filiis Dauid regni aeterni sedes sempiterna? quae electa Sion dicitur, horret ruinis, uacua incolis est: et quomodo dei requies est in saecula saeculorum? currunt tempora, et hoc uitae nostrae saeculum manet: deus ergo sine requie est?
And why he should not turn away the face of his Christ for the sake of David his servant, he shows, saying: "The Lord swore truth to David, and he will not disappoint him." The Lord swears, and swears truth; he confirms the faith of his word even with an oath, so that we may not doubt. He will not, then, defraud his David of the truth sworn. And what he swore to him is worth considering: "Of the fruit of your womb I will set upon my throne. If your sons keep my covenant and these testimonies of mine which I will teach them, their sons also shall sit upon your throne for ever. For the Lord has chosen Zion; he has chosen it as a dwelling for himself. This is my rest for ever and ever: here I will dwell, for I have chosen it." What is contained here that is proper to David? That city which was the royal city of his line, captured and overthrown by the Babylonians, did not keep the dignity of a kingdom under the rule of its masters; afterward, captured and burned by the Romans too, it no longer exists. And where is God's rest for ever? Where are kings from the fruit of his womb on God's throne? For today they serve as exiles, without a homeland, scattered over the whole world. And where is that truth which was sworn? Where is the promise that he will not be disappointed of the truth? And where is the everlasting throne of an eternal kingdom for the sons of David? What is called the chosen Zion bristles with ruins and is empty of inhabitants: and how is it God's rest for ever and ever? Times run on, and this age of our life remains: is God, then, without rest?
131.19CSEL 22:676–677
Sed qui haec infelicis erroris opinione sic credunt, audiant, cui Dauid iuratum sit. illi nempe, de quo dictum est: posui adiutorium super potentem, exaltaui de plebe mea electum. inueni Dauid seruum meum et in oleo sancto liniui eum. manus enim mea auxiliabitur illi, et brachium meum confortabit eum. nihil proficiet inimicus in eo, et filius iniquitatis non adiciet nocere eum. et concidam inimicos eius a facie ipsius et odientes eum in fugam conuertam. et ueritas mea et misericordia mea cum ipso, et in nomine meo exaltabitur cornum eius. et ponam in mari manum eius. et in fluminibus dexteram eius. ipse inuocabit me: pater meus es tu, deus meus, et susceptor salutis meae. et ego primogenitum ponam illum, excelsum prae reges terrae. in aeternum seruabo illi misericordiam meam et testamentum meum fidele ipsi. et ponam in saeculum saeculi semen eius et sedem eius sicut dies caeli. si dereliquerint filii eius legem meam et in iudiciis meis non ambulauerint, si iustificationes meas profanauerint et mandata mea non custodierint, uisitabo in uirga iniustitias eorum et in uerberibus peccata eorum. misericordiam uero meam non dispargam ab eo, neque decipiam in ueritate mea, neque profanabo testamentum meum et, quae procedunt de labiis meis, non faciam inrita. semel iuraui in sancto meo, si Dauid mentiar: semen eius in aeternum manebit; et sedis eius sicut sol in conspectu meo et sicut luna perfecta in aeternum. promissiones istae Dauid eius sunt, qui aduersus potentem adiutor electus est, cuius in mari manus est, cuius in fluminibus dextera est, qui nuncupare patrem deum audet, quia est; qui ipse primogenitus est, qui excelsus super reges terrae, cuius semen in saeculum saeculi est, cui, quae dicta sunt, non inrita sunt, cui semel sine mendacio iuratur in sancto, cuius sedis sicut sol in conspectu dei est et permanet ut luna perfecta in aeternum. ex huius igitur uentris fructu super dei sedem conlocabuntur.
But let those who believe these things in the opinion of an unhappy error hear to whom the oath was sworn to David: surely to him of whom it is said: "I have laid help upon one who is mighty; I have exalted one chosen from my people. I have found David my servant, and with holy oil I have anointed him. For my hand will help him, and my arm will strengthen him. The enemy will gain nothing against him, and the son of iniquity will not again harm him. And I will cut down his enemies before his face, and those who hate him I will put to flight. And my truth and my mercy are with him, and in my name his horn shall be exalted. And I will set his hand on the sea and his right hand on the rivers. He will call upon me: You are my Father, my God, and the upholder of my salvation. And I will make him the firstborn, high above the kings of the earth. For ever I will keep my mercy for him, and my covenant faithful to him. And I will establish his seed for ever and ever, and his throne as the days of heaven. If his sons forsake my law and do not walk in my judgments, if they profane my statutes and do not keep my commandments, I will visit their iniquities with the rod and their sins with stripes. But my mercy I will not scatter from him, nor deceive in my truth, nor profane my covenant, and what proceeds from my lips I will not make void. Once I have sworn by my holy one, that I will not lie to David: his seed shall remain for ever, and his throne like the sun in my sight, and like the full moon for ever." These promises belong to that David who was chosen as helper against the mighty, whose hand is on the sea, whose right hand is on the rivers, who dares to call God Father, because he is; who himself is the firstborn, who is high above the kings of the earth, whose seed is for ever and ever, for whom what has been said is not void, to whom an oath is sworn once by the holy one without falsehood, whose throne is like the sun in the sight of God and endures like the full moon for ever. From the fruit of this one's womb, then, they will be placed upon God's throne.
131.20CSEL 22:677–678
Quomodo autem ex fructu simus uentris eius. audiamus Hieremiam prophetam docentem: si, inquit, audistis huiusmodi, si peperit masculus. partum sexus iste non recipit; sed generatio, quae a deo est, partus instar obtinuit. audiamus et Paulum parturientem in filiis procreandis, cum dicit: filii mei, quos iterum parturio. esse autem omnes nos sibi filios ipse dominus in euangelio testatur dicens: fili, remissa sunt tibi peccata, et iterum: filioli, adhuc uobiscum sum. filii itaque ipsius sunt in sede domini conlocandi.
How we are of the fruit of his womb, let us hear the prophet Jeremiah teaching: "If," he says, "you have heard such a thing: whether a male has given birth." That sex does not admit childbirth; but the begetting that is from God has taken the likeness of childbirth. Let us hear Paul too in labor to bring forth sons, when he says: "My children, with whom I am again in labor." And that we are all his children the Lord himself testifies in the Gospel, saying: "Son, your sins are forgiven"; and again: "Little children, yet a while I am with you." His children, then, are to be placed on the Lord's throne.
131.21CSEL 22:678–679
Et spei condicio praeponitur: si, inquit, custodierint fili tui testamentum meum et testimonia mea, quae docebo eos. Moyses legem scripsit, in qua testimonia dei continentur, propheta hic idem totus deuersatur in lege: et quomodo adhuc filii illius Dauid in testimoniis sunt docendi? non praesentis aetatis est sermo, sed his proprius, de quibus dictum est: confitebor tibi, domine deus, pater caeli et terrae, quia abscondisti haec a sapientibus et prudentibus et reuelasti ea paruulis. sed docti et manentes in his, quae docebuntur, quid consequentur? usque in saeculum, inquit, sedebunt super sedem tuam. et qui isti sunt, qui sedebunt? nempe de quibus dictum est: et uos sedebitis super duodecim thronos iudicantes duodecim tribus Israhel.
And a condition of the hope is set first: "If," it says, "your sons keep my covenant and my testimonies, which I will teach them." Moses wrote the law, in which the testimonies of God are contained; this same prophet spends himself wholly in the law: how, then, are the sons of that David still to be taught the testimonies? The saying is not of the present time but is proper to those of whom it is said: "I confess to you, O Lord God, Father of heaven and earth, that you have hidden these things from the wise and prudent and revealed them to little ones." But taught and remaining in what they will be taught, what will they obtain? "For ever," it says, "they shall sit upon your throne." And who are these who will sit? Surely those of whom it is said: "And you will sit upon twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel."
131.22CSEL 22:679
Non neglegendum est autem id, quod superius et inferius dicitur. superius enim dictum est: ponam super sedem meam; nunc autem dicitur: sedebunt super sedem tuam. et hoc quid erit? nempe id, quod dicitur: omnia, quae patris sunt, mea sunt. sedis patris sedis et filii est, quia: ego et pater unum sumus. aut quomodo intellegetur: ponam super sedem meam et: sedebunt super sedem tuam, nisi quod per concordem et non dissimilem a se innascibilis unigenitique naturam et pater in filio et filius in patre est deitatis in utroque nec genere nec uoluntate dissidente substantia, cum paternae maiestatis gloria unigenito congenita sit? atque ob id sedem filii sedem suam pater nuncupat, quia et ex se et in gloria indemutabilis diuinitatis suae unigenitus et uerus deus natus sit, nec contumeliam communicatarum cum eo sedium sentiat, cui ex se genito in naturae similitudine nulla diuersitas est.
We must not neglect what is said above and below. For above it was said: "I will set upon my throne"; but now it is said: "They shall sit upon your throne." And what will this be? Surely what is said: "All that the Father has is mine." The Father's throne is the Son's throne too, because "I and the Father are one." Or how will "I will set upon my throne" and "they shall sit upon your throne" be understood, except that, through the concordant and not unlike nature of the Unbegotten and the Only-begotten, the Father is in the Son and the Son in the Father, the substance of deity in both differing neither in kind nor in will, since the glory of the Father's majesty is inborn in the Only-begotten? And therefore the Father calls the Son's throne his own throne, because the Only-begotten was born both from him and in the glory of his unchangeable divinity, true God; nor does he feel it an affront to share thrones with him, since in him, begotten from himself in likeness of nature, there is no diversity.
131.23CSEL 22:679–680
Dignitas deinde eorum, qui in saeculum super sedem sessuri sunt, ostenditur ita: quoniam elegit dominus Sion, praeelegit eam in habitationem sibi. haec requies mea in saeculum saeculi: hic habitabo, quoniam praeelegi eam. non montem scilicet Sion desertum et inutilem legit, neque ciuitatem dirutam et euersam. locis enim deus non continetur, neque omnipotens et aeterna substantia aut in desertis montium solitudinibus aut in nominibus urbium ruinis iam deformium conquiescit. sed elegit eorum requiem, de quibus dominus in euangelio ait: nemo uenit ad me, nisi pater, qui me misit, adducat illum. illam Sion sanctam et caelestem Hierusalem elegit, concordem scilicet fidelium coetum et sanctificatas sacramentis ecclesiae animas, in quibus tamquam rationabili et intellegenti et emundata et aeterna per resurrectionis gloriam domo rationabilis et intellegens et inpolluta et aeterna inenarrabilis diuinitatis natura requiescat. non quod ex ea, in qua est, infinitatis suae inmensitate desistat, ut humanarum mentium angustiis coartetur; sed quia per digni se habitaculi sedem, qui ubique et idem et totus et semper est, in sanctis probabilibusque requiescat. ubi nulla offensio, non demutatio, sed in saeculum saeculi, id est in aeterna tempora digna et placens habitatio sit electa.
Then the dignity of those who will sit upon the throne for ever is shown thus: "For the Lord has chosen Zion; he has chosen it as a dwelling for himself. This is my rest for ever and ever: here I will dwell, for I have chosen it." He did not, of course, choose Mount Zion, deserted and useless, nor a city torn down and overthrown. For God is not contained by places, nor does the almighty and eternal substance rest either in the deserted solitudes of mountains or in the names of cities now disfigured by ruins. But he chose the rest of those of whom the Lord says in the Gospel: "No one comes to me unless the Father who sent me draws him." He chose that holy Zion and heavenly Jerusalem, namely the harmonious assembly of the faithful and the souls sanctified by the sacraments of the church, in which, as in a house rational, intelligent, cleansed, and eternal through the glory of the resurrection, the rational, intelligent, undefiled, and eternal nature of the ineffable divinity may rest: not that it leaves the immensity of its infinity in which it is, so as to be confined within the narrow bounds of human minds, but that he who is everywhere, the same, whole, and always, rests in the saints and the approved through the seat of a dwelling worthy of him; where there is no offense, no change, but for ever and ever, that is, for eternal times, a worthy and pleasing dwelling has been chosen.
131.24CSEL 22:680–681
Dehinc sequitur: uiduam eius benedicens benedicam. quidam translatorum interpretatus esse ita repertus est: captionem eius benedicens benedicam: tamquam uenatoribus et piscatoribus hominum effectis apostolis haec eorum benedicta sit captio, maxime quod Bethsaida, ex qua apostoli sunt, per interpretationem linguae hebraicae domus uenantium nuncupetur. sed nobis sequenda est prima illa et sub Iudaeorum temporibus ante domini aduentum ad ecclesiae doctrinam consignata translationis auctoritas: uiduam eius benedicens benedicam. quanta uiduarum dignitas est et honesta unius tori conscientia et felicis continentiae indemutata constantia! haec enim benedicitur et benedicendo benedicitur: ex iudicio scilicet benedicentis benedictione fit digna. sed apostolus gentium doctor hortatur nos et aliud de uidua, quae benedicenda est, sentire. lege enim non per uirtutem spiritalis efficientiae, sed per finem obseruantiae eius emortua uiduam eam esse, quae ex synagoga effecta ecclesia sit, docet dicens: an ignoratis, fratres — scientibus enim legem loquor—,quoniam lex dominatur homini, in quantum temporis uiuit? quae enim sub marito est mulier, uiuo marito uincta est legi. si autem mortuus fuerit maritus, euacuata est a lege mariti. ergo uiuente marito adultera uocabitur, si iungatur alii uiro. si autem moriatur maritus eius, liberata est a lege, ne adultera teneatur coniuncta alii uiro. itaque, mi fratres, et uos mortificati estis legi per corpus Christi: ut et ipsi sitis alterius, eius, qui a mortuis resurrexit. conparatione uiduse, quae mortuo marito libera, quibus uolet, nuptiis sit, desinente iam lege uiduam legis ecclesiam esse demonstrat Christo legitime copulandam. hanc ergo legis uiduam benedicendo benedicet.
Then follows: "Her widow I will surely bless." One of the translators has been found to have rendered it thus: "Her catch I will surely bless," as though, the apostles having been made hunters and fishers of men, their catch were blessed; especially since Bethsaida, from which the apostles came, is called by interpretation of the Hebrew language "house of hunters." But we must follow that first authority of translation, sealed for the teaching of the church in the times of the Jews before the Lord's coming: "Her widow I will surely bless." How great is the dignity of widows, the honorable consciousness of a single marriage bed, and the unchanged constancy of a happy continence! For she is blessed, and blessed by blessing: that is, she becomes worthy of the blessing by the judgment of the one who blesses. But the apostle, the teacher of the Gentiles, urges us to think something else too about the widow who is to be blessed. For he teaches that the widow is she who from the synagogue has become the church, the law being dead not in the power of its spiritual working but by the end of its observance, saying: "Or do you not know, brothers (for I speak to those who know the law), that the law has dominion over a man for as long as he lives? For the woman who is under a husband is bound to the law while the husband lives. But if the husband dies, she is released from the law of the husband. So while the husband lives she will be called an adulteress if she is joined to another man. But if her husband dies, she is freed from the law, so that she is not held an adulteress though joined to another man. So, my brothers, you too have been put to death to the law through the body of Christ, so that you may belong to another, to him who rose from the dead." By the comparison of a widow, who, her husband dead, is free for whatever marriage she will, he shows that the church, the law now ceasing, is the widow of the law, to be lawfully joined to Christ. This widow of the law, then, he will surely bless.
131.25CSEL 22:681–682
Deinde ait: pauperes eius saturabo panibus. bonum est in ecclesia pauperes non esurire: quia, cum inops pascitur aut sitiens potatur aut nudus uestitur aut infirmus uisitatur aut carcere clausus requiritur, et hsec officiorum obsequia ei deferuntur, qui in singulis nobis esurit et sitit et alget et infirmatur et clauditur quique ait: amen, dico uobis, quia, quae fecistis uni ex minimis istis, mihi fecistis. per hanc ergo dictorum eius fidelem professionem pauperes panibus saturat. saturat autem et eos panibus, qui per humilitatem cordis contemptumque saeculi se ipsos in paupertate constituunt, quos cibo uitae perennis explebit, sicut loco alio dictum est; diuites eguerunt et esurierunt; inquirentes autem dominum non minuentur omni bono.
Then it says: "Her poor I will satisfy with bread." It is good that the poor not go hungry in the church: because when the needy is fed, or the thirsty given drink, or the naked clothed, or the sick visited, or one shut in prison sought out, these services of duty are rendered to him who in each of us hungers and thirsts and is cold and sick and shut in, and who says: "Amen I say to you, what you did to one of the least of these, you did to me." Through this faithful profession of his words, then, he satisfies the poor with bread. And he satisfies with bread those too who through humility of heart and contempt of the world place themselves in poverty, whom he will fill with the food of everlasting life, as is said in another place: "The rich have become needy and hungry, but those who seek the Lord shall not lack any good thing."
131.26CSEL 22:682
Deinde sequitur: sacerdotes eius induam salutare, et sancti eius exultatione exultabunt. sacerdotes superius iustitiam induuntur; sed profectum honoris sui sumunt: salutare scilicet induuntur conformes effecti glorise salutaris, quia secundum apostolum de caelis saluificatorem nostrum expectamus, qui potens est secundum operationem efficientiae suae corpus humilitatis nostrae conformare corpori gloriae suae. hoc ergo salutari sacerdotes induuntur; sed et sancti exultatione exultabunt. superius exultabunt tantum, adhuc in humilitatis corpore positi et spe tantummodo aeternitatis laeti: ceterum nunc perfecta exultatione exultantes, non spe, sed ueritate, non imagine, sed corpore. est enim plerumque exultatio, quae demutari solet uel casu uel infirmitate uel tempore; at uero haec sanctorum exultatio ea est, ut exultatione consummatae in se exultationis exultent.
Then follows: "Her priests I will clothe with salvation, and her saints shall exult with exultation." Above, the priests were clothed with righteousness; but they receive an advance in their honor: they are clothed with salvation, made conformable to the saving glory, because, according to the apostle, we await from heaven our Savior, who is able, according to the working of his power, to conform the body of our lowliness to the body of his glory. With this salvation, then, the priests are clothed; and the saints too shall exult with exultation. Above, they were only to exult, while still placed in the body of lowliness and glad only in the hope of eternity; but now they exult with perfect exultation, not in hope but in truth, not in image but in body. For there is often an exultation that is wont to be changed by chance or weakness or time; but this exultation of the saints is such that they exult with the exultation of an exultation complete in itself.
131.27CSEL 22:682–683
Causa autem exultationis ostenditur; illic producam cornu Dauid. cornum regni insignium est: per hoc enim unguentum regium regnaturis infundebatur. illic cum dicitur, requies significatur, de qua dictum est: haec requies mea in saeculum saeculi. in hac igitur requie cornum Dauid, id est regnum illius, de quo prophetatur, Dauid deus producit: non illud humanum neque corruptibile nec caducum, sed illud, quod secundum requiem dei in saeculum saeculi est. et quorum erit regnum caelorum? nempe de quibus dictum est: beati pauperes spiritu; quoniam ipsorum est regnum caelorum, id est, in quo aeternus rex et cuius secundum Danielem regni finis nullus est, regnabit.
The cause of the exultation is shown: "There I will bring forth the horn of David." The horn is the emblem of kingship: for through it the royal ointment was poured on those who were to reign. When "there" is said, the rest is signified, of which it is said: "This is my rest for ever and ever." In this rest, then, God brings forth the horn of David, that is, the kingdom of that David who is prophesied: not that human, corruptible, and perishable kingdom, but the one that, according to God's rest, is for ever and ever. And whose will the kingdom of heaven be? Surely of those of whom it is said: "Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven," that is, the kingdom in which the eternal king, whose kingdom according to Daniel has no end, will reign.
131.28CSEL 22:683–684
Non occultus igitur hic rex est: hunc lex praedicat, hunc prophetae pollicentur, hunc Iohannis paenitentiae praedicator ostendit. ille est enim secundum domini in euangelio dictum lucerna ardens, Christum tenebris mundi huius ostendens. omnis igitur de eo prophetia lucerna eius est, ignorantiae nostrae nocti scientiae lumen ostendens, infideles atque inpios ueritatis luce confundens et in unigenito paternae maiestatis gloriam docens. et hoc illud est, quod sequitur: paraui lucernam Christo meo. inimicos eius induam confusionem: super ipsum autem floriet sanctificatio mea. parata lucerna est, ne ad cognoscendum eum nox ignorationis obsisteret. inimici eius confusione induentur; uidebunt enim filium hominis in maiestate patris sui: et non salute, sed confusione induentur, terreni scilicet et in dedecoris corpore resurgentes: super ipsum autem floriet sanctificatio mea. exaltauit, inquit, eum deus et donauit illi nomen, quod est super omne nomen: ut in nomine Iesu Christi omne genu flectat caelestium et terrestrium et infernorum, et omnis lingua confiteatur, quia dominus Iesus in gloria dei patris, qui est benedictus in saecula saeculorum. amen.
This king, then, is not hidden: the law proclaims him, the prophets promise him, John, the preacher of repentance, points him out. For he, according to the Lord's saying in the Gospel, is the burning lamp, showing Christ to the darkness of this world. Every prophecy about him, then, is his lamp, showing the light of knowledge to the night of our ignorance, confounding the unbelieving and impious with the light of truth, and teaching the glory of the Father's majesty in the Only-begotten. And this is what follows: "I have prepared a lamp for my Christ. His enemies I will clothe with confusion; but upon him my sanctification shall flourish." The lamp has been prepared, so that the night of ignorance may not stand in the way of knowing him. His enemies will be clothed with confusion; for they will see the Son of Man in the majesty of his Father, and they will be clothed not with salvation but with confusion, being earthly and rising in a body of disgrace. "But upon him my sanctification shall flourish." "God exalted him," it says, "and gave him the name that is above every name, that at the name of Jesus Christ every knee should bend, of things in heaven and on earth and under the earth, and every tongue confess that the Lord Jesus is in the glory of God the Father," who is blessed for ever and ever. Amen.
Tractates 132
132.1CSEL 22:684–685
Per omnem doctrinae ordinem gradibus scanditur; nam per gradus ad superiora prouehimur. in eo enim; quod ita coepit propheta: ecce, quam bonum et quam iucundum. docemur, quid bonum atque iucundum sit, ut per cognitionem eorum in bonis iucundisque maneamus. seruata autem scienter ea ratio prophetae est, quod bonum iucundumque sociaret: quia non omne, quod bonum est, iucundum est, neque omne, quod iucundum est, bonum est. iucundus est luxus, sed bonus non est; est enim in ipsa illa corporalis lasciuise amoenitate detrimentum et salutis et famae. bona est tolerantia iniuriae, cum ad inreligiositatem conpellimur poenis famis, sitis, frigoris, uigiliarum. contumeliarum, dolorum, sed iucunda non est; illic enim iniuriosum perfectae uirtutis officium est. atque ita per haec nonnumquam et bonum iucunditate indiget et iucunditas solet eo carere, quod bonum est.
Through the whole order of teaching we climb by steps; for by steps we are carried up to higher things. In that the prophet began thus, "Behold, how good and how pleasant," we are taught what is good and pleasant, so that by knowing them we may remain in what is good and pleasant. The prophet knowingly kept the reasoning of joining good and pleasant, because not everything that is good is pleasant, nor is everything that is pleasant good. Luxury is pleasant, but it is not good; for in that very charm of bodily wantonness there is damage both to health and to reputation. Bearing injury is good, when we are pressed toward irreligion by the punishments of hunger, thirst, cold, sleeplessness, insults, and pains; but it is not pleasant, for there the duty of perfect virtue is hurtful. And so, through these things, the good sometimes lacks pleasantness, and pleasantness often lacks what is good.
132.2CSEL 22:685
Videamus, quid illud sit, quod bonum et iucundum esse propheta demonstrat, scilicet habitare fratres in unum. non humanas cohabitationes nec terrenarum domorum communionem propheta laudauit. nam fratres ob haec ipsa tectorum consortia dissidentes uidemus, et inimicos saepe eiusdem domicilii habitatio continet: et nonnumquam incrementum odiis ipsa illa cohabitandi indignatio subministrat. sed nouit esse apostolus communem et religiosam domum dicens: ut scias, quemadmodum oporteat te in domo dei deuersari, quae est ecclesia dei uiui, columna et firmamentum ueritatis. itaque bonum et iucundum est in unum habitare fratres. cum in unum habitant, conuentu ecclesiae congregantur: cum fratres nuncupantur. unicae uoluntatis caritate concordes sunt.
Let us see what it is that the prophet shows to be good and pleasant: namely, "for brothers to dwell in unity." The prophet did not praise human cohabitation nor the sharing of earthly houses. For we see brothers at odds over the very sharing of roofs, and living in the same dwelling often holds enemies; and sometimes the very resentment of living together adds fuel to hatreds. But the apostle knew there is a common and religious house, saying: "That you may know how you ought to conduct yourself in the house of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and foundation of the truth." So it is good and pleasant for brothers to dwell in unity. When they dwell in unity, they are gathered in the assembly of the church; when they are called brothers, they are in harmony through the love of a single will.
132.3CSEL 22:685–686
Ad primam enim apostolorum praedicationem hoc praecipuum fuisse credentium praeconium legimus, quod dicitur: erat enim omnium credentium cor et anima una, adsensu eadem, uoluntate non dissonans. fide socia, amoris ac sententiae unanimitate perfecta. et hoc testatur ille gentium doctor dicens: ut sitis omnes perfecti, eodem sensu, eadem sententia. et rursum: inplete gaudium meum, ut idipsum sapiatis eandem caritatem habentes, unanimes, unum sentientes, nihil per aemulationem siue per inanem gloriam agentes, sed in humilitate inuicem arbitrantes prsecellere super inuicem, non sua, sed aliorum unusquisque uestrum contemplantes. hoc apostoli gaudium est, idipsum nos sapere, amore eodem contineri, per unius sensus sententiam unanimes permanere, non per aemulationem separari, neque per inanis gloriae studium dissidere, non sua, sed aliorum unumquemque cogitare oportere, ut ea, quibus alienae uoluntates in concordia detinendae sint, cogitemus. quod alio in loco admonet dicens: si possibile est, ex uobis ad omnes pacem habentes. ex nobis uult esse, ut, si possibile est, pax ad omnes sit. uoluntas nostra omnium amicitiis dedita sit, si et ceterorum natura habeat pacis adfectum; dummodo non ex nobis causa aut interruptae aut non conseruatse pacis existat. hoc itaque populo dei congruit, sub uno patre fratres esse, sub uno spiritu unum esse, sub una domo unianimes incedere, sub uno capite unius corporis membra esse. non enim oculus aurem odit, nec nares os exsecrantur, nec manus pedem spernit. haec enim ut officiis mutuis sibi, ita et amore destricta sunt. hoc iucundum et bonum est, habitare fratres in unum, in eodem esse, idem esse, nec congregatione fieri nec amore diuersos.
For at the first preaching of the apostles we read that this was the special praise of believers, as it is said: "For the heart and soul of all who believed were one": one in assent, not discordant in will, partners in faith, perfect in unanimity of love and judgment. And the teacher of the Gentiles testifies to this, saying: "That you may all be perfect in the same mind and the same judgment"; and again: "Complete my joy by being of the same mind, having the same love, of one accord, thinking one thing, doing nothing through rivalry or empty glory, but in humility each counting the others as surpassing himself, each of you looking not to his own things but to those of others." This is the apostle's joy: that we be of the same mind, held together by the same love, remain of one accord through the judgment of one mind, not be separated by rivalry nor divided by the pursuit of empty glory, and that each ought to think not of his own things but of others', so that we consider the means by which the wills of others may be kept in harmony. This he urges in another place, saying: "If it is possible, as far as it depends on you, being at peace with all." He wants it to depend on us that, if possible, there be peace with all. Let our will be devoted to friendship with all, if the nature of others too has a disposition to peace, provided that the cause of peace being broken or not kept does not arise from us. This, then, befits the people of God: to be brothers under one Father, to be one under one Spirit, to walk of one mind under one roof, to be members of one body under one head. For the eye does not hate the ear, nor the nostrils loathe the mouth, nor does the hand spurn the foot. For as these are bound to one another by mutual services, so also by love. This is pleasant and good, for brothers to dwell in unity: to be in the same, to be the same, and to become different neither in assembly nor in love.
132.4CSEL 22:686–687
Conparationem uero huius boni iucundique propheta constituit dicens: sicut unguentum de capite, quod descendit in barbam Aaron, quod descendit in oram uestimenti eius. Aaron unguento, cuius compositio et confusio ex odoribus continetur, unctus est in sacerdotem. hanc consecrationem primi sacerdotis sui deo esse conplacuit. dominum quoque nostrum inuisibiliter et incorporaliter unctum esse cognouimus, cum dicitur: unxit te deus tuus oleo exsultationis. unctio ista terrena non est, incorporea est, inuisibilis est: non de oleo ut sacerdos et propheta, non cornu ut rex, sed oleo exsultationis ungitur. opus istud laetitiae spiritalis est et ad sacramentum caelestis unctionis exsultationis fructus adhibetur; non materies creaturae est. quia corporalia corporalibus indigebant, Aaron myro confusionis ungitur; sed id, quod corporale est, per efficientiam uirtutis spiritalis imbutum speciem olei caelestis imitatur. denique post hanc unctionem Aaron secundum legem Christus est nuncupatus, postquam unctionis confusio per id, quod a deo confundi demonstrata est, in speciem unctionis inuisibilis consecratur. ut igitur hoc myrum omnes foetentes odores et inmundos cordium spiritus. quocumque infusum fuerit, extinguit seque in omnia, in quae infertur, odor hic suauitatis infundit, ita per hoc sacramentum unctionis infusae et per eam omni terrenorum ac sordentium uitiorum nostrorum foetore deterso deo iam quod est suaue spiramus. nouit hunc suaueolentise spiritum beatus apostolus Paulus dicens ita: Christi bonus odor sumus deo in omni loco, in his, qui saluantur, et in his, qui pereunt; et in istis quidem odor ex morte in mortem, istis autem odor ex uita in uitam: ut odorem uitae nos esse uiuentibus, ita odorem esse mortis his, qui in peccatis suis morerentur, ostendens. ipse autem Christi odor ex nobis bonus deo est. ut igitur placitum hoc in primo, id est Aaron, sacerdote unguentum deo extitit, quo in exemplum olei exsultationis perungebatur gratum deo ex se fidei et innocentiae odorem praebens, ita bonum et iucundum est habitare fratres in unum, per quod unanimitas uoluntatis eiusdem primis et maximis sacramentis bonorum caelestium conparatur.
The prophet set up a comparison for this good and pleasant thing, saying: "Like the ointment from the head, which ran down upon the beard of Aaron, which ran down upon the hem of his garment." Aaron was anointed priest with an ointment whose composition and blending consists of spices. This consecration of his first priest was pleasing to God. We know too that our Lord was anointed invisibly and incorporeally, when it is said: "God, your God, has anointed you with the oil of gladness." This anointing is not earthly; it is incorporeal, invisible: he is anointed not with oil as a priest and prophet, not with a horn as a king, but with the oil of gladness. This is the work of spiritual joy, and the fruit of gladness is applied to the mystery of the heavenly anointing; it is not the material of a creature. Since bodily things needed bodily things, Aaron is anointed with a blended perfume; but what is bodily, imbued through the efficacy of spiritual power, imitates the form of the heavenly oil. Finally, after this anointing Aaron is called, according to the law, christ, after the blending of the anointing, through the fact that it was shown to be blended by God, is consecrated as a figure of the invisible anointing. As, then, this perfume extinguishes all foul smells and unclean breaths of hearts wherever it is poured, and this sweet fragrance pours itself into everything into which it is brought, so through this mystery of poured ointment, and through it, all the stench of our earthly and filthy vices being wiped away, we now breathe toward God what is sweet. The blessed apostle Paul knew this spirit of sweet fragrance, saying thus: "We are the good fragrance of Christ to God in every place, among those who are being saved and among those who are perishing; to the latter a fragrance from death to death, to the former a fragrance from life to life": showing that as we are a fragrance of life to the living, so we are a fragrance of death to those who would die in their sins. But this fragrance of Christ from us is good to God. As, then, this ointment proved pleasing to God in the first priest, Aaron, with which he was anointed as a pattern of the oil of gladness, offering from himself to God a pleasing fragrance of faith and innocence, so it is good and pleasant for brothers to dwell in unity, by which unanimity of the same will is compared to the first and greatest mysteries of heavenly goods.
132.5CSEL 22:687–689
Descendit autem unguentum a capite in barbam. barba uirilis aetatis ornatus est. neque enim nos paruulos esse in Christo oportet nisi ad id tantum, quod dictum est: paruuli malitia, non sensu. infideles autem omnes idem apostolus paruulos esse, quia infirmes ad cibum firmum manentes adhuc lactis egeant, obiurgat dicens: lacte uos potaui, non cibo: non enim poteratis, sed neque adhuc potestis. de se autem ita: cum factus sum uir, dereliqui ea, quae sunt paruuli. occurrere uero in id festinat, in uirum consummatum, in mensuram aetatis plenitudinis corporis Christi. unguentum hoc ergo in Aaron barbam, id est in consummatae fidei uirum descendit a capite. caput secundum apostolum uiri Christus est. Moyses unguentum hoc composuit et confudit; sed componendum et confundendum deus docuit, et deus mediator in lege. de capite ergo, id est de Christo descendit in barbam: et ab eo descendit, cui dictum est: unguentum exinanitum nomen tuum. descendit autem in eum, qui per aetatis firmitatem indemutabilis esset fidei firmitate mansurus. descendit autem etiam in ora uestimenti. ora uestimenti ea sunt, quae usque ad pedes defluunt, per quod ad omne corpus hic unguenti odor a capite in barbam et deinde ad uestimenti ora descendit. in his autem mulieribus, quae ungentes dominum typum ecclesiae in euangelio praetulerunt. ita docemur, quod una caput, alia pedes unxerit; per quod unaquaeque earum significatur in parte corporis omne corpus unxisse. media itaque corporis praetermissa sunt. nam dum ora uestimenti et barba memorantur, omne in his corpus ostenditur.
The ointment runs down from the head onto the beard. The beard is the adornment of manly age. For we ought not to be little ones in Christ except only in the sense of the saying, "Little ones in malice, not in understanding." The same apostle rebukes all the unfaithful as little ones because, remaining weak for solid food, they still need milk, saying: "I gave you milk to drink, not food; for you were not able, and even now you are not able." But of himself thus: "When I became a man, I put away the things of a little child." He hastens to attain to the perfect man, to the measure of the age of the fullness of the body of Christ. This ointment, then, ran down from the head onto Aaron's beard, that is, onto the man of perfected faith. The head of the man, according to the apostle, is Christ. Moses composed and blended this ointment; but God taught how it was to be composed and blended, and God was the mediator in the law. From the head, then, that is, from Christ, it ran down onto the beard; and it ran down from him to whom it is said: "Your name is ointment poured out." It ran down onto one who, through the firmness of age, would remain in the firmness of unchangeable faith. It ran down also onto the hem of the garment. The hems of the garment are what flow down to the feet, by which this fragrance of ointment runs down to the whole body from the head to the beard and then to the hem of the garment. In those women who, anointing the Lord, bore in the Gospel a figure of the church, we are taught thus: that one anointed his head, another his feet; by which each of them is signified to have anointed, in one part of the body, the whole body. So the middle parts of the body are passed over; for when the hem of the garment and the beard are mentioned, the whole body is shown in them.
132.6CSEL 22:689
Additur etiam et alterius conparationis exaequatio, cum dicitur: sicut ros Hermon, qui descendit in monte Sion. ros ab Hermon in Sion non descendet; multo enim a se interuallo hi montes diuersi sunt. neque sane natura fert, ut ros a loco in locum descendere posse uideatur. Sion autem est secundum doctrinam caelestem ecclesia, uel quse nunc est, uel quae erit sanctorum, quse per resurrectionem glorificatorum et laetantium angelorum coetu frequentatur. Hermon autem mons est in Phoenice. cuius interpretatio anathema est; quod enim nobiscum anathema nuncupatur, id hebreice Hermon dicitur. fertur autem id, de quo etiam nescio cuius liber extat, quod angeli concupiscentes filias hominum, cum de caelo descenderent, in hunc montem maxime excelsum conuenerint. sed haec praetermittamus. quae enim libro legis non continentur, ea nec nosse debemus: commemorata autem ob id tantum sunt, quia nos de hoc monte dei per prophetam professio commouebat. certe hodie gentes montem hunc profana religione uenerantur et interpretationem nominis sui, quod est anathema, ipsa illa impiae superstitionis sede testantur.
The likeness of another comparison is also added, when it is said: "Like the dew of Hermon, which comes down upon Mount Zion." Dew will not come down from Hermon onto Zion; for these mountains are separated from each other by a great distance. Nor indeed does nature allow dew to be seen to come down from place to place. But Zion, according to heavenly teaching, is the church, either the one that now is or the one of the saints that will be, which through the resurrection is thronged by the company of the glorified and of rejoicing angels. Hermon, however, is a mountain in Phoenicia, whose meaning is "anathema"; for what we call anathema is in Hebrew called Hermon. It is reported, about which a book of someone or other also exists, that the angels, desiring the daughters of men, when they came down from heaven, gathered on this exceedingly high mountain. But let us pass over these things. For what is not contained in the book of the Law we ought not even to know; they have been mentioned only because the prophet's statement about this mountain of God moved us. Certainly today the Gentiles venerate this mountain with a profane religion, and by that very seat of impious superstition testify to the meaning of its name, which is "anathema."
132.7CSEL 22:689–690
Ros uero de caelis est, et inter benedictionum munera optari eum meminimus, cum Isaac ad Iacob ait: et det tibi deus a rore cseli et ab ubertate terrse multitudinem. ergo quia munera et benedictiones dei, quibus primum omnia, cum creata et facta sunt, benedixit, postea uero ex peccato Adae in anathemate constiterunt, gratum deo est, ea rursum in sanctificationis sedem redire atque descendere. benedictus enim homo fuit; sed post benedictionem, statim ut peccauit. statim impius fuit. sed qui mauult peccatoris paenitentiam quam mortem, uult benedictionis suae rorem ab Hermon in Sion descendere, id est ex impietatis sede in sanctificationis locum transire. rore enim omnia uirescunt, aluntur, augentur: ita principali illa dei benedictione homo gignitur, spirat, excrescit. est ergo bonum atque iucundum, ut a gentili errore, id est a profana Hermon ueneratione descendens ad Sion, id est ad aeternae beatitudinis domum transeat et eum, qui salute omnium laetatur, oblectet ob id: quoniam illic mandauit dominus benedictionem et uitam usque in saecula, in Sion scilicet uel etiam in unanimitate cohabitantium fratrum. benedictiones enim ecclesia sola largitur, uitam aeternam unanimitas promeretur. qui dixit enim aeternae uitae uiam pandens: diligite inuicem, sicut ego dilexi uos, non mendax est. est enim ipse ueritas, uia, uita, dominus noster Iesus Christus, qui est benedictus in saecula saeculorum. amen.
Dew comes from heaven, and we remember that it is desired among the gifts of blessing, when Isaac says to Jacob: "And may God give you of the dew of heaven and of the fatness of the earth abundance." Since, then, the gifts and blessings of God, with which he first blessed all things when they were created and made, afterward through Adam's sin came to stand under the anathema, it is pleasing to God that they should return again and come down to the seat of sanctification. For man was blessed; but after the blessing, as soon as he sinned, he was at once impious. But he who prefers the repentance of the sinner to his death wills that the dew of his blessing should come down from Hermon onto Zion, that is, pass over from the seat of impiety to the place of sanctification. For by dew all things grow green, are nourished, increase: so by that primal blessing of God man is begotten, breathes, grows. It is good and pleasant, then, that man, coming down from Gentile error, that is, from the profane veneration of Hermon, should pass over to Zion, that is, to the house of eternal blessedness, and delight him who rejoices in the salvation of all, "because there the Lord has commanded blessing and life for ever": in Zion, that is, or also in the unanimity of brothers dwelling together. For the church alone bestows blessings; unanimity earns eternal life. For he who, opening the way of eternal life, said, "Love one another as I have loved you," is no liar. For he himself is the truth, the way, the life, our Lord Jesus Christ, who is blessed for ever and ever. Amen.
Tractates 133
133.1CSEL 22:690–691
Finem sumunt cantica graduum, sed ascensionibus suis dignum. cum enim per ea ad cognitionem sacramenti caelestis scandatur, necesse est, ut postea benedictio ei, ad quem conscensum sit, debeatur. uocat igitur omnes propheta, ad benedicendum dominum et tamquam consummatis omnibus uniuersos ad contestationem honoris debiti congregat dicens: ecce nunc benedicite dominum omnes serui domini. in eo autem, quod ait: ecce nunc, elaboratae ascensionis perfectum so opus esse significat, ut iam nunc benedicant, quia proficientes ascenderint. benedicendus est, quia nos in excelsum prouexerit. quia fidei gradibus in sublime domus suae eleuauerit. benedictione autem dei os peccatoris indignum est; et idcirco ait: omnes serui eius. non omnium est deo accepta benedictio, neque se promiscuus putet placere posse. soli istud conpetit dei seruo, non peccati seruo nec saeculi seruo. omnis enim, inquit, qui facit peccatum, seruus est peccati. seruo igitur dei conpetit, ut dominum suum religioso ore benedicat.
The songs of ascents come to their end, but an end worthy of their ascents. For since by them one climbs to knowledge of the heavenly mystery, it follows that blessing is afterward owed to him to whom the climb has been made. The prophet therefore calls everyone to bless the Lord, and, as if all things were completed, gathers all to bear witness to the honor due, saying: "Behold now, bless the Lord, all you servants of the Lord." In saying "behold now" he signifies that the work of the laborious ascent is complete, so that they may now bless, because by making progress they have ascended. He is to be blessed because he has carried us on high, because he has raised us by the steps of faith to the height of his house. But the mouth of a sinner is unworthy of blessing God; and therefore he says: "all his servants." Not everyone's blessing is acceptable to God, nor should just anyone think he can please him. This belongs only to the servant of God, not to the servant of sin nor the servant of the world. "For everyone," it says, "who commits sin is the servant of sin." It belongs to the servant of God, then, to bless his Lord with a religious mouth.
133.2CSEL 22:691
Ac ne ipsi quidem seruo hoc erit proprium, qui se seruum nomine solo profiteatur, qui etiam nunc cunctabundus et fluctuans incerto fidei uento circumferatur, cuius cogitatio et uoluntas in recordationem peccaminum et in curas uoluptatum euagetur. et idcirco cum dixisset: ecce nunc benedicite dominum omnes serui eius, adiecit: qui statis in domo domini, in atriis domus domini. qui stat, loco non mouetur. iam cucurrit, iam ascendit, iam immobilis manet, iam auide bibit beatam illam prophetae uocem: statuit super petram pedes meos; et rursum: in petra exaltasti me; et audiet tamquam Moysi sibi dici: tu autem sta hic mecum. de peccatoribus autem ita legimus: dilexerunt mouere pedes suos. standum ergo est in domo domini, quia benedictio stantium placeat et stantium in domo illa sancta et caelesti Hierusalem et angelorum frequentium, ad quam per hanc ecclesiae et conuentus nostri domum scanditur.
And this will not belong even to a servant who professes himself a servant by name only, who even now, hesitant and wavering, is carried about by the uncertain wind of faith, whose thought and will wander off into the remembrance of sins and the cares of pleasures. And therefore, when he had said, "Behold now, bless the Lord, all his servants," he added: "you who stand in the house of the Lord, in the courts of the house of the Lord." He who stands is not moved from his place. He has already run, has already ascended, already remains immovable, already drinks eagerly that blessed voice of the prophet: "He set my feet upon a rock"; and again: "On a rock you have exalted me"; and he will hear, as if said to himself as to Moses: "But you, stand here with me." But of sinners we read thus: "They loved to move their feet." One must stand, then, in the house of the Lord, because the blessing of those who stand is pleasing, of those standing in that holy and heavenly house, Jerusalem, thronged with angels, to which one climbs through this house of the church and our assembly.
133.3CSEL 22:691–692
Et quia plures apud patrem mansiones sunt, benedicunt dominum non solum in domo stantes, sed etiam in atriis eius. non omnis domus atrium est. domus est etiam, quidquid extra atrium est: interior autem et familiarior atrii sedes est. interiores stabunt ergo, qui in atrio sunt, quia, sit licet dignitas in domo stare, prseuenit tamen ille, qui in atrio steterit. diuersos uero esse eos, qui in domo, et eos, qui in atrio sint, alibi propheta demonstrat dicens: plantati in domo domini in atriis dei nostri florient. maior fructus est effloruisse. et licet plantatio habeat dignitatem, prsecellit tamen efflorescentium honor, quia, ut initium in plantatione est, ita gaudium boni operis in flore est.
And since there are many dwellings with the Father, those bless the Lord who stand not only in the house but also in its courts. Not every house is a court. Whatever is outside the court is also the house; but the court is the more inward and intimate seat. Those, then, who are in the court will stand further within, because, although it is a dignity to stand in the house, yet he who has stood in the court goes beyond. That those in the house and those in the court are different, the prophet shows elsewhere, saying: "Planted in the house of the Lord, they will flourish in the courts of our God." To have flowered is the greater fruit. And although planting has its dignity, yet the honor of those who blossom surpasses it, because, as the beginning is in the planting, so the joy of good work is in the flower.
133.4CSEL 22:692
Repperi autem quosdam ambiguos circa hoc: in atriis domus domini fuisse dicentes, idcirco hoc a translatoribus primis adiectum esse, quia sub iisdem uersibus sequenti psalmo continetur, opinantibus ipsis scriptorum uitio in libris hebraicis fuisse praeteritum. sed noui interpretes, quae uolunt, tractent: nobis uero obsequendum est et auctoritati translationum et uetustati.
I have found some in doubt about this, saying that "in the courts of the house of the Lord" was added by the first translators because it is contained under the same verses in the following psalm, they themselves supposing that it had been omitted in the Hebrew books by a scribal fault. But let the new interpreters treat these matters as they will: we must defer to the authority and antiquity of the translations.
133.5CSEL 22:692–693
In hanc autem spem standi in domo et in atriis domini propheta nos hortatur dicens: in noctibus extollite manus uestras in sancta et benedicite dominum. agimus enim secundum apostolum sub principibus harum tenebrarum, et nox nos saeculi detinet, quae per euangelicam prsedicationem iam proficit in lucem. nox enim iam proficit, sicut in die decenter ambulate. in hac igitur nocte ignorantiae, insidiarum, infirmitatum, concupiscentiarum, uitiorum eleuandae manus sunt in sancta, non ad precandum et orandum tantum, sed et ad operandum. preces enim nudae non proficiunt eleuanda autem opera nostra sunt in dei sancta, id est in nudis uestiendis, in esurientibus cibandis, in sitientibus potandis, in adflictis consolandis, in oppressis adiuuandis, in omnibus diligendis. haec enim nos in hac corporis nostri infirmitate sanctificant, haec deo placita et sancta sunt. et hoc non ignorat propheta dicens: eleuatio manuum mearum sacrificium uespertinum. nunc enim in consummationem saeculi, quod est uespertinum, non in tauris et in hircis, sed in operibus bonis deo hostia est. Moyses nos docuit exemplo, qui, cum eleuatis constitisset manibus, uincebat, summissis uero in terram uincendum populum ab hoste praebebat, ostendens per hanc formam, hostem nostrum, si terrena opera nostra sint, uincere, si excelsa uero sint, esse uincendum. eleuandae igitur manus nostra sunt in noctibus, ut plantemur in domo, ut in atriis floreamus. et benedicendus est dominus, id est cum dei benedictione semper operandum est, ne, cum panem inopi praebeas, metu famis tristis sis; ne, cum sumptum indigenti offeras, damnum putes; ne, cum nudum ueste induas, exui te existimes. hilarem enim datorem amat deus
The prophet urges us to this hope of standing in the house and in the courts of the Lord, saying: "In the nights lift up your hands to the holy places, and bless the Lord." For, according to the apostle, we live under the rulers of this darkness, and the night of the world holds us, which through the preaching of the Gospel is already advancing toward light. "For the night is far spent; walk decently as in the day." In this night, then, of ignorance, snares, weaknesses, desires, and vices, the hands are to be lifted up to the holy places, not only for praying and entreating but also for working. For bare prayers do not avail; our works are to be lifted up to the holy things of God, that is, in clothing the naked, feeding the hungry, giving drink to the thirsty, comforting the afflicted, helping the oppressed, loving all. For these sanctify us in this weakness of our body; these are pleasing and holy to God. And the prophet is not unaware of this, saying: "The lifting up of my hands is an evening sacrifice." For now, at the consummation of the age, which is the evening, the offering to God is not in bulls and goats but in good works. Moses taught us by example: when he stood with hands raised, he was winning, but when they were lowered to the ground he gave the people over to be defeated by the enemy, showing by this figure that if our works are earthly, our enemy wins, but if they are lofty, he is to be defeated. Our hands, then, are to be lifted up in the nights, that we may be planted in the house and flourish in the courts. And the Lord is to be blessed, that is, we must always work with God's blessing: lest, when you give bread to the needy, you be sad for fear of hunger; lest, when you offer means to one in want, you think it a loss; lest, when you clothe the naked, you think you are being stripped. "For God loves a cheerful giver."
133.6CSEL 22:693
Quid autem laeta et benedicentia eleuatarum manuum opera mereantur, ostendit dicens: benedicat te dominus ex Sion, dominus scilicet ecclesiae et sanctae Hierusalem et ciuitatis uiuis lapidibus gemmarum extructae. et ut in deo uero et aeterno spem omnem nostram positam cognosceremus, adiecit: qui fecit caelum et terram, eum scilicet ecclesiarum deum esse demonstrans, qui caelum fecisset et terram: per dominum nostrum Iesum Christum, qui est benedictus in saecula saeculorum. amen.
And what the joyful and blessing works of lifted hands deserve, he shows, saying: "May the Lord bless you out of Zion": the Lord, that is, of the church and of the holy Jerusalem and of the city built of the living stones of gems. And so that we might know that all our hope is placed in the true and eternal God, he added: "who made heaven and earth," showing that the God of the churches is he who made heaven and earth: through our Lord Jesus Christ, who is blessed for ever and ever. Amen.
Tractates 134
134.1CSEL 22:693–695
Psalmus secundum simplicitatem audientium absolutus uidetur. ea enim ex maiore parte in eo continentur, quae libro Exodi inscripta sunt, Aegypti plagae, Pharaonis poena, regum mortes et hostilis terrae obtenta hereditas. sed si secundum apostolum, quae in lege sunt, umbra est futurorum, quae in ea gesta fuerunt, allegorumena sunt, non neglegenter audienda sunt, quia sub corporalium gestorum fide in exemplo sint spiritalium operum constituta. magnae autem diligentiae res est, uirtutem uerborum conlocatorum expendere et scire, quid cuique rei sub eorum, quae dicta sunt, significatione sit proprium. at enim non omnium est herbarum genera uirtutesque nosse, et si qui inperitus ac nescius in agrum his salubribus herbis diuitem uenerit, omnia inutilia et promiscue genita existimans praeteribit, at uero si peritus et doctus hunc pretiosissimum in his germinibus agrum fuerit ingressus, omnia, quae ab aliis praeterita erunt, demetet et ea, quae ab ignaris erunt neglecta, mirabitur sciens, quando utile metendorum eorum tempus sit et in quae genera sanitatum his utendum sit et quantum ex his aut quo usque moderandum sit, sic et in diuinis scripturis esse intellegendum est, ut, si eas inperitse aures et mens rustica audiat, tamquam otiosas et non necessarias neglegat; at uero si calens ad cognitionem dei auditor ac lector adstiterit et cui frequens lectio et spiritalis gratiae donum scientiam diiudicandi singula intellegendique praestiterit, mirabitur omnia atque his secundum naturales eorum uirtutes et efficientias utetur non ignarus, quando quid praesumendum sit et in quam curationem eligendum, quando ex eo corpori sanatio, quando animae medella tribuenda sit, ne quid prseproperum, ne quid inportunum ac tardum sit, sed conlatis et uirtutibus et temporibus et rebus non inperite his, quae sibi conperta fuerint, utatur; quod quidem maxime in hoc psalmo ita esse intellegitur. incredibilem enim in modum ea rebus gestis uerba subiecta sunt, ut, cum fideliter illa, quae gesta sunt, enuntiarent, maiorem tamen internae et spiritalis intellegentiae profectum ex se ita conlocata prsestarent. neque tantum haec ratio seruata est, ut res ipsae, quae corporaliter gestae sunt, ad ostendendam dei magnificentiam commemorarentur, uerum etiam ut per condiciones gestorum et uirtutes nominum exemplum de se gerendis in his, quae sunt gesta, praeberent. itaque necessarium est haec singula personis, temporibus, uirtutibus discernere, ut ea, quae incuriosse aures tamquam non necessaria forte perdiderint, ipsa illa ad humanae infidelitatis medellam sanationemque referantur. et hoc ipsis rebus in psalmo docebimur, qui ita coeptus est:
To the simplicity of hearers the psalm seems plain. For it contains, for the most part, what is written in the book of Exodus: the plagues of Egypt, Pharaoh's punishment, the deaths of kings, and the inheritance gained of a hostile land. But if, according to the apostle, what is in the law is a shadow of things to come, and what was done in it are things spoken allegorically, they must not be heard carelessly, since under the faithfulness of bodily events they have been set as an example of spiritual works. It is a matter of great care to weigh the force of the words placed and to know what is proper to each thing under the meaning of what has been said. For not everyone knows the kinds and virtues of herbs. If someone unskilled and ignorant comes into a field rich in these healthful herbs, he will pass them all by, thinking them useless and grown at random; but if one skilled and learned enters this most precious field of plants, he will gather everything others passed by and will admire what the ignorant neglected, knowing when is the useful time for gathering them, for what kinds of healing they are to be used, and how much of them, or how far, is to be measured out. So too we must understand it to be in the divine Scriptures: if unskilled ears and a rustic mind hear them, they neglect them as idle and unnecessary; but if a hearer and reader stands by who is eager for the knowledge of God, and to whom frequent reading and the gift of spiritual grace have given the skill to judge and understand each thing, he will admire everything and use it according to its natural virtues and efficacies, not ignorant of when something is to be taken and for what cure it is to be chosen, when healing is to be given from it to the body and when medicine to the soul, so that nothing be premature, nothing ill-timed or late, but, comparing virtues, times, and things, he may use skillfully what he has learned. This is understood to be so especially in this psalm. For in an incredible way the words have been fitted to the events, so that, while faithfully stating what was done, they nevertheless, so placed, offer a greater advance in inner and spiritual understanding. Nor was this reasoning kept only so that the things done bodily might be recalled to show God's magnificence, but also so that, through the circumstances of the deeds and the force of the names, they might offer in what was done an example of what we are to do. It is necessary, then, to distinguish each of these by persons, times, and virtues, so that what incurious ears may perhaps have lost as unnecessary may be applied to the healing and cure of human unbelief. And this we shall be taught by the very contents of the psalm, which begins thus:
134.2CSEL 22:695–696
Laudate nomen domini, laudate serui dominum: qui statis in domo domini, in atriis domini dei nostri. laudate dominum, quia benignus est dominus: psallite nomini eius, quoniam suaue est et contuendum in exordio psalmi est, quod ad laudem nos dei aduocat, cum in superiore psalmo ad solam benedictionem hortatus sit. praestare autem laudi benedictionem non ambiguum est. primus enim honor in benedictione positus est, sed consummatur in laude. et laus non incipienda confuse est, sed ordine ac modo confitenda est. hoc enim primum est: laudate nomen domini. nomen ergo domini primum laudare admonemur, quia deus caeli sit, quia deus terrae sit, quia deus mundi sit, quia deus, quod fidei nostrae et spei proprium est, Abrahse et Isaac et Iacob sit. in his enim primum deo laus est.
"Praise the name of the Lord; praise the Lord, you servants, who stand in the house of the Lord, in the courts of the Lord our God. Praise the Lord, for the Lord is kind; sing psalms to his name, for it is sweet." And we must observe at the beginning of the psalm that it calls us to the praise of God, whereas in the previous psalm it urged us only to blessing. There is no doubt that blessing goes before praise: for the first honor is placed in blessing, but it is completed in praise. And praise is not to be begun confusedly, but confessed in order and measure. For this is first: "Praise the name of the Lord." We are admonished first, then, to praise the name of the Lord: that he is God of heaven, God of the earth, God of the world, and, what is proper to our faith and hope, the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. In these, first, is praise to God.
134.3CSEL 22:696
Sequens uero praeceptum est: laudate serui dominum. per cognitionem nominis dei ad scientiam eius proficimus. iam enim non nomen domini, sed dominum laudamus cognoscentes. cur deus caeli sit, cur deus terrae sit, cur deus mundi sit, cur deus Abrahae et Isaac et Iacob sit. haec enim primum puerilis doctrinae rudimenta transgressi deum non iam per oboedientiam subditorum, sed per inmensae uirtutis suae magnificentiam laudamus et laudamus serui eius; neque solum serui eius nudo tantum professionis nostrae uocabulo nuncupati, sed stantes in domo eius, iam non uagi neque erratici, sed stantium firmitate stabiliti; neque tantummodo stantes, sed etiam in atrio domini dei nostri, internae potius et mediae domus sede suscepti. per hunc igitur ordinem a seruis et a stantibus in domo atque in atrio laus inchoatur.
The next command is: "Praise the Lord, you servants." Through knowledge of God's name we advance to knowledge of him. For now we praise not the name of the Lord but the Lord, knowing why he is God of heaven, why God of the earth, why God of the world, why God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. For having passed beyond these first rudiments of childish teaching, we praise God no longer through the obedience of subjects but through the magnificence of his boundless power; and we praise him as his servants: and not only as his servants called by the bare name of our profession, but as standing in his house, no longer wandering or straying but established with the firmness of those who stand; and not only standing, but in the court of the Lord our God, received into the more inward and central seat of the house. In this order, then, praise is begun by servants and by those who stand in the house and in the court.
134.4CSEL 22:696–697
Laudandus deus ob id est, quia benignus est. nam ut omnipotens sit, naturae suae uirtus est; ut uero benignus sit. nobis necessarium est, quos corporis infirmitas et condicio originis in peccatis detinet. et quid spei est humanis delictis. si benignitas deo absit? sed dictorum ratio consideranda est: namque qui laudandus est, quia benignus est, psallendum nomini eius est, quia suaue est. psallite nomini eius, quoniam suaue est. psallite ubi dicitur, ad corporis opera refertur, ut per organi nostri, id est corporis multimoda opera consonans deo fiat et apta laudatio. psallere ergo nomini eius iubemur, quia suaue est. suaue enim est deo corpora nostra conplacito ministerio probabilique famulari: uel ipsum illud potius nomen domini suaue est.
God is to be praised because he is kind. For that he is almighty is the power of his nature; but that he is kind is necessary for us, whom the weakness of the body and the condition of our origin hold in sins. And what hope is there for human offenses if kindness is absent from God? But the reasoning of the words must be considered: for he who is to be praised because he is kind, to his name we must sing psalms because it is sweet. "Sing psalms to his name, for it is sweet." Where "sing psalms" is said, it refers to the works of the body, so that through the manifold works of our instrument, that is, the body, a harmonious and fitting praise may be made to God. We are commanded, then, to sing psalms to his name, because it is sweet. For it is sweet to God that our bodies should serve him with pleasing and approved service: or rather that very name of the Lord is sweet.
134.5CSEL 22:697
Et quid suauitatis in se habeat uel nomen eius uel ei psallere, continuo subiecit dicens: quoniam Iacob elegit sibi dominus, Israhel in possessionem sibi. initium originis Iudseorum secundum sanctificationem generis Abraham est, ad hunc enim primum dei fuit sermo; et cur potius Iacob quam Abraham dominus elegit? dehinc cum idem secundum nuncupationis allocutionem sit Israhel qui et Iacob, cur iterum additur: Israhel in possessionem sibi? ordo exigebat principem electionis Abraham, non eum, qui iam tertius in electione est, Iacob commemorari. ratio quoque admonebat, ut significatus Israhel in Iacob intellegeretur. quin etiam illud accedit, quod, qui Iacob est, eligitur, qui Israhel, possidetur.
And what sweetness either his name or singing psalms to him has in itself, he at once added, saying: "For the Lord has chosen Jacob for himself, Israel for his possession." The beginning of the origin of the Jews, according to the sanctification of the race, is Abraham, for to him first came the word of God; why, then, did the Lord choose Jacob rather than Abraham? Then, since Israel is the same as Jacob according to the address of naming, why is it added again: "Israel for his possession"? Order required that Abraham, the head of the election, be mentioned, not Jacob, who is already third in the election. Reason also urged that the meaning of Israel be understood in Jacob. Moreover, there is this too: that he who is Jacob is chosen, he who is Israel is possessed.
134.6CSEL 22:697–698
Sed iam in exordio sermonis monuimus, illa ex rebus corporaliter gestis commemorata in psalmo esse, in quibus futuri species tamquam in speculo reluceret; ea quoque gestis rebus coaptata uerba esse, quae, cum ea, quae gesta sunt, enuntiarent, tamen intellegentiam nobis absolutiorem eorum, quse spiritaliter in gestis rebus prsefigurabantur, adferrent. dei nomen suaue est, non uni tantum genti atque ipsi inreligiosse, sed omnibus iam gentibus atque linguis. Iacob enim sibi elegit maiorem natu supplantantem, ementem primitias cibo et desperatione uenalis, abripientem benedictionem, inpsenitentem post seruitutem, deinde post luctam deum uidentem et Israhel nuncupatum. ante enim Iacob est et sic Israhel. circumspiciamus ecclesiae corpus, quae se per differentiam fidei et Iacob et Israhel habet. et hic coetus populum legis fide supplantat, primitias eius accipit, benedictionem eius diripit secundum domini dictum dicentis: a diebus autem Iohannis regnum caelorum uim patitur, et uim facientes diripiunt illud. Iacob est ergo, qui eligitur domino dicente: ego uos elegi, non uos me. Israhel est, qui possidetur, in praeteritis primogenitis et benedictionibus cognitus, in seruitute multi temporis fidelis, in sacramento luctae potens, in promerendis rursum benedictionibus pertinax, in dei cognitione et conspectu Israhel.
But at the beginning of our discussion we pointed out that things from bodily events are recalled in the psalm in which the form of the future shines as in a mirror, and that the words are fitted to the events in such a way that, while stating what was done, they nevertheless bring us a fuller understanding of what was spiritually prefigured in the events. The name of God is sweet, not to one nation only, and that an irreligious one, but now to all nations and tongues. For he chose for himself Jacob, who supplanted the elder, bought the birthright for food and from the despair of the one who sold it, carried off the blessing, did not regret his servitude, then after the wrestling saw God and was named Israel. For first he is Jacob, and then Israel. Let us look around at the body of the church, which, through the difference of faith, holds itself to be both Jacob and Israel. This company too supplants the people of the law by faith, receives its birthright, and carries off its blessing, according to the saying of the Lord: "From the days of John the kingdom of heaven suffers violence, and the violent carry it off." It is Jacob, then, that is chosen, as the Lord says: "I chose you, not you me." It is Israel that is possessed: known in the birthrights and blessings that passed it by, faithful in a servitude of long time, strong in the mystery of the wrestling, persistent in winning blessings again, and Israel in the knowledge and sight of God.
134.7CSEL 22:698
Nouit autem spiritus prophetiae prsepotentem hanc nominis dei in congregandis gentibus et possidendis fidelibus suauitatem dicens: quia ego cognoui, quam magnus est dominus. officio quidem oris sui propheta loquitur, sed cognitione non sua. uox ista eius est, qui ait: nemo nouit patrem, nisi filius et cui uoluerit filius reuelare; et filius quidem patrem, si cui uoluerit, reuelabit, sed magnitudinem eius nemo cognoscit propheta dicente: cuius magnificentiae non est finis. cognitio ergo infinitatis huius ei soli erit propria, qui secundum perfectam originis suae plenitudinem ipse imago est infiniti.
The Spirit of prophecy knows this all-powerful sweetness of God's name in gathering the nations and possessing the faithful, saying: "For I have known how great the Lord is." The prophet speaks with the service of his own mouth, but not with his own knowledge. This voice is his who says: "No one knows the Father except the Son and him to whom the Son wills to reveal him"; and the Son indeed will reveal the Father to whom he wills, but no one knows his greatness, as the prophet says: "Of whose greatness there is no end." Knowledge of this infinity, then, will belong to him alone who, according to the perfect fullness of his origin, is himself the image of the Infinite.
134.8CSEL 22:698–699
Quia ego cognoui, quam magnus est dominus: et deus noster prae omnibus diis. non prae diis omnibus illis est, de quibus infra ait: simulacra gentium argentum et aurum, opera manuum hominum: os habent et non loquentur; nihil enim magnum, si metallis et saxis et lignis conparatus prsefertur. et quia isti dii non sunt, quaerendum est, quos deos dixerit. non enim deorum multitudinem ecclesia cognoscit. error hic gentium est, ut coitus et conceptus et procreationes et successiones deorum aut fingat aut credat. nobis autem secundum apostolum unus deus, ex quo omnia, et nos in ipso; et unus dominus noster Iesus Christus, per quem omnia, et nos per ipsum. unus ex uno, deus ex deo est. non recipit alterum innascibilis, ut duo sint; nec admittit, quod est unus unigenitus, ne deus sit. non sunt duo innascibiles, non sunt duo unigeniti: in eo unusquisque quod est, unus est; dum parem nec unigenitus habet, nec innascibilis admittit, neque unigenitus deus ex alio quam innascibili deo subsistit.
"For I have known how great the Lord is, and our God is above all gods." He is not above all those gods of whom he says below: "The idols of the nations are silver and gold, the works of men's hands: they have a mouth and will not speak"; for there is nothing great if he is preferred when compared with metals, stones, and wood. And since these are not gods, we must ask whom he called gods. For the church does not acknowledge a multitude of gods. This is the error of the Gentiles, to invent or believe in the intercourse, conceptions, procreations, and successions of gods. But for us, according to the apostle, there is one God, from whom are all things, and we in him; and one Lord, our Jesus Christ, through whom are all things, and we through him. One from one, God from God. The Unbegotten does not admit another, so that there should be two; nor does the fact that the Only-begotten is one exclude his being God. There are not two unbegotten, there are not two only-begotten: in what each is, each is one; since neither does the Only-begotten have an equal of his kind, nor does the Unbegotten admit one, nor does the only-begotten God subsist from any other than the unbegotten God.
134.9CSEL 22:699–700
Videndum autem est, prae quibus omnibus diis deus noster sit. inuenio deos dici per prophetam ita: deus stetit in congregatione deorum, in medio autem deos discernit. et hoc quidem uidetur ambiguum nec satis absolute enuntiare, quos deos significet. sed dominus in euangeliis errore nos nuncupationis huius liberauit dicens: ego dixi, dii estis et filii excelsi omnes. et adiecit: si ergo illos dixit deos, ad quos uerba dei facta sunt, et non potest solui scriptura. indissolubilis dei sermo est, homines deos nuncupatos. inuenio et Moysen deum nuncupari, cum ei dicitur: deum te posui Pharaoni. sed et apostolus docuit dici alios deos, cum ait: namque etsi sunt, qui dicuntur dii siue in caelo siue in terra, sicut sunt dii multi et domini multi: sed nobis unus deus pater est, ex quo omnia, et unus dominus noster Iesus Christus. per quem omnia. unus quidem deus nobis est et unus dominus: sed multi dii sunt, qui uocantur in caelo et in terra. et quidem, si hoc deorum nomen hominibus secundum sententiam dei conpetit, multo magis angelis, archangelis, thronis et dominationibus, potestatibus, principatibus dignum, quos apostolus in caelo deos nuncupari monstrat.
We must see, however, above which gods our God is. I find gods spoken of through the prophet thus: "God stood in the assembly of gods, and in the midst he judges between gods." And this seems ambiguous and does not state clearly enough which gods it means. But the Lord in the Gospels freed us from error about this naming, saying: "I said, you are gods, and all sons of the Most High"; and he added: "If, then, he called them gods to whom the word of God came, and Scripture cannot be broken." God's word cannot be broken: men are called gods. I find Moses too called a god, when it is said to him: "I have made you a god to Pharaoh." But the apostle too taught that others are called gods, when he says: "For even if there are those called gods, whether in heaven or on earth, as there are many gods and many lords, yet for us there is one God the Father, from whom are all things, and one Lord our Jesus Christ, through whom are all things." For us, indeed, there is one God and one Lord; but there are many gods who are called so in heaven and on earth. And indeed, if this name of gods belongs to men according to the sentence of God, much more is it worthy of angels, archangels, thrones and dominions, powers, principalities, whom the apostle shows are called gods in heaven.
134.10CSEL 22:700
Hi ergo sunt, qui uocantur, sed prae omnes deus noster est: non conparatione, qui inconparabilis prsecellit, sed potestate prae ceteros est; et quomodo prae ceteros, mox ostendit dicens: omnia, quae uoluit, fecit in caelo et in terra, in mari et in abyssis. soli deo congruit omnia facere, quae uelit. sola enim perfecta uirtus in nullo inpeditur, quominus, quod uelit, et faciat; et ei, ex quo omnia sunt, nihil difficultatis occurrit. inferioris ab eo naturae est, ne totum, quod uelit, efficiat. dum enim alii debet, quod est, caret omnipotentiae uirtute, quia in id ipsum, quod subsistit, habet alium auctorem. et qui non se sibi debet, non omnia potest, dum a potiore subsistit. sed uideamus, quid sit illud, quod omnipotentia dei secundum uoluntatem suam fecerit in caelo et in terra, in mari et in abyssis.
These, then, are those who are so called; but our God is above all: not by comparison, since he excels beyond comparison, but he is above the rest in power; and how he is above the rest he shows at once, saying: "All that he willed he has done in heaven and on earth, in the sea and in the depths." It belongs to God alone to do all that he wills. For only perfect power is in nothing hindered from doing what it wills; and to him from whom all things are, no difficulty arises. It belongs to a nature inferior to him not to accomplish all that it wills. For whoever owes what he is to another lacks the power of omnipotence, because for the very thing that he subsists he has another author. And he who does not owe himself to himself cannot do all things, since he subsists from a greater. But let us see what it is that the omnipotence of God did according to his will in heaven and on earth, in the sea and in the depths.
134.11CSEL 22:700–701
Et quidem magnum est, si contueamur indemutabilem caeli firmitatem, solem annuis cursibus indefessisque moderatum uicesque anni definitis limitibus temperantem, perennes quoque lunae uicissitudines et inperturbatos ortus, lapsus, conuersiones signorum, iam uero terrae opes et fecundos eius fructus in uitam hominum, pecudum, uolucrum, bestiarum, plena deinde incolis suis maria et spirantium intra fluctus piscium uitam, tum porro, quia plurali genere maria graecitas elocuta est, oceani inaestimabiles uices et capacis abyssi inperspicabilem naturam, qua refusus in terram aestus resorbetur. sed cum haec secundum humanam opinionem plena miraculis sint ac de ipsis dici merito debeat: omnia, quae uoluit, fecit in caelo et in terra, in mari et in abyssis, uideamus, quae ea omnia sint, quae uoluit et fecit.
It is indeed a great thing if we behold the unchanging firmness of heaven; the sun, regulated in its yearly and untiring courses and tempering the changes of the year within fixed limits; the perpetual changes of the moon too, and the undisturbed risings, settings, and turnings of the constellations; and then the riches of the earth and its fertile fruits for the life of men, cattle, birds, and beasts; then the seas full of their inhabitants and the life of fish breathing within the waves; and further, since the Greek has spoken of seas in the plural, the incalculable tides of the ocean and the impenetrable nature of the capacious abyss, by which the surge poured out upon the land is sucked back. But although these things, according to human opinion, are full of wonders, and it might rightly be said of them, "All that he willed he has done in heaven and on earth, in the sea and in the depths," let us see what all those things are that he willed and did.
134.12CSEL 22:701–702
Educens nubes ab extremo terrae fulgora in pluuiam fecit, qui producit uentos de thensauris suis. praeterito thronorum, dominationum, principatuum et potestatum, Cherubim et Seraphim, angelorum et archangelorum, caeli, terrae, maris, abyssi miraculo in his omnia deus, quae uoluit, fecit in caelo et in terra, in mari et abysso: educens nubes ab extremo terrae fulgura in pluuiam fecit, qui producit uentos de thensauris suis? an haec tantum perfectae in deo uoluntatis omnipotentia est, terras exhalare nubes, coruscare pluuiis inminentibus fulgura, alternantes spiratibus flare uentos? sed arguunt hanc opinionem nostram uirtutes uerborum et naturae generum. educens, inquit, nubes ab extremo terrae; quid enim sibi uult, quod nubes educuntur et educuntur ab extremo terrae? exhalant quidem ualles uuidse nebulas; sed neque ualles extrema terrae sunt, neque quisquam nebulam id ipsum existimauit esse, quod nubem. dehinc fulgura in pluuiam fecit. quae hic humani sensus intellegentia est? fulgura nonnumquam sine pluuiis uidemus et pluuias saepe esse sine fulgure. non pluuiae fulgura adferunt, neque rursum fulgura pluuias deferunt. sequitur quoque: qui producit uentos de thensauris suis. quae hic humani sensus intellegentia est? anne in concauo aliquo et communito thensaurorum loco conditos esse uentos existimabimus, ex quibus uenti soleant tamquam pretiosissima thensauri portio produci? et cum solent mutationes uentorum frequentes et incertae saepe et contrariae commoueri. totiens negotiosus ad haec deus ipsos istos, ut demutentur, ut dissideant, ex secreto diuitiarum suarum producit?
"Bringing up clouds from the end of the earth, he made lightnings for the rain; he brings forth the winds out of his treasuries." Passing over the wonder of the thrones, dominions, principalities and powers, Cherubim and Seraphim, angels and archangels, heaven, earth, sea, and abyss, did God do in these all that he willed in heaven and on earth, in the sea and the abyss: "bringing up clouds from the end of the earth, he made lightnings for the rain; he brings forth the winds out of his treasuries"? Or is this alone the omnipotence of a perfect will in God: that the lands breathe out clouds, that lightnings flash when rains threaten, that winds blow with alternating breaths? But the force of the words and the natures of things refute this opinion of ours. "Bringing up," it says, "clouds from the end of the earth": what does it mean that clouds are brought up, and brought up from the end of the earth? Damp valleys indeed breathe out mists; but valleys are not the end of the earth, nor has anyone thought a mist to be the same as a cloud. Then: "he made lightnings for the rain." What understanding of human sense is here? We sometimes see lightnings without rain, and there is often rain without lightning. Rains do not bring lightnings, nor do lightnings bring down rains. There follows too: "he brings forth the winds out of his treasuries." What understanding of human sense is here? Shall we think that the winds are stored in some hollow and fortified place of treasuries, from which winds are usually brought forth like the most precious portion of a treasure? And since the changes of the winds are usually stirred up frequent, uncertain, and often contrary, does God, so often busy with these things, bring these winds out of the secret place of his riches so that they may change and conflict?
134.13CSEL 22:702
Sed haec a me uolenti uirtutem et rationem dictorum ostendere ita commemorata sint, ut nihilominus inuisibilis et omnipotentis uirtutis esse intellegatur, a mari, quod est ab extremo terrae, nubes educi et inter pluuias fulgura coruscare et uentos ex occultis spiratuum suorum sedibus flare. uerum quia non in his tantum omnipotentia dei est, neque in his solum, quae uoluit, fecit in caelo et in terra, in mari et in abyssis, et in his, quae corporaliter gesta esse memorantur, spiritalia significari meminimus: demonstrandum est nunc, quid sub his dictis per uirtutem prophetiae intellegere debeamus.
But let these things have been mentioned by me, in my wish to show the force and reasoning of the words, in such a way that it may nonetheless be understood to belong to invisible and almighty power that clouds are brought up from the sea, which is at the end of the earth, that lightnings flash amid rains, and that winds blow from the hidden seats of their breathing. But since the omnipotence of God is not only in these things, nor did he do only in these all that he willed in heaven and on earth, in the sea and in the depths, and since we remember that in things recorded as done bodily spiritual things are signified, we must now show what we ought to understand under these sayings through the power of prophecy.
134.14CSEL 22:702–703
In eo, quod omnia, quae uoluit, fecit in caelo et in terra, in mari et in abyssis, quantum cognitioni nostrae permissum est, nihil amabilius deo homine est. et subest causa, ut peculiare hoc ei animal sit. mundus uerbo constitit, homo autem cum consilio efficitur, non uerbo, sed opere cogitato. fit quoque ad imaginem dei; per inspirationem etiam dei uiuens anima perficitur. legem accipit, uoluntati suae permittitur, liber ab omnibus mundi dominus constituitur, paradisi incola est, inuidia diaboli dignus est, post peccatum misericordiae reseruatur, omni saeculi huius aetate ad cognitionem dei eruditur, iudex angelis praeparatur. reuelationem eius creatura expectat uanitati in spem et ipsa subiecta; ob paenitentiam eius ex peccato angelorum in caelis maximum gaudium est. hic ipse per sacramentum natiuitatis secundum hominem legum Christum adsumptus in eum est. iam ubique inreligiosum ante os eius religionem docet, iam pollutum stupris corpus continentia purum est, iam caeca quondam a cognitione dei mens Israhel facta est. iam inuidia in imitationem boni profecit, iam ebrietas in ieiunia exarsit, iam odium in amorem demutatum est, iam uitia in uirtutum uita perempta sunt. -
In that "all that he willed he has done in heaven and on earth, in the sea and in the depths," so far as is permitted to our knowledge, nothing is dearer to God than man. And there is a reason why he is God's special creature. The world was established by a word, but man is made with deliberation, not by a word but by a thought-out work. He is made too in the image of God; by the inbreathing of God he is completed as a living soul. He receives a law, is left to his own will, is set free as lord of all the world, is an inhabitant of paradise, is worthy of the devil's envy, is reserved for mercy after sin, is trained for the knowledge of God through every age of this world, is prepared as a judge of angels. Creation, itself subjected to vanity in hope, awaits his revelation; at his repentance from sin there is the greatest joy among the angels in heaven. This very man, through the mystery of the birth according to the flesh, has been taken up into Christ. Now everywhere the mouth that was formerly irreligious teaches religion; now the body once polluted with acts of sexual immorality is pure by continence; now the mind once blind to the knowledge of God has become Israel. Now envy has advanced into imitation of the good; now drunkenness has burned into fasts; now hatred has been changed into love; now vices have been destroyed in the life of virtues.
134.15CSEL 22:703
Fecit ergo dominus omnia, quae uoluit, in caelo et in terra, in mari et in abyssis. nihil enim in his omnibus prius homine suo habuit, ob quem etiam unigenitus eius deus homo extitit; et fecit ista educens nubes ab extremo terrae. nubibus dominus praecepit, ne super spinosam et infecundam uineam pluerent: mandabo, inquit, nubibus, ne pluant super eam. cognoui et nubem, in qua locutus est deus: in columna, inquit, nubis loquebatur ad eos. et testatur mihi Paulus in hac nube non hoc solum, quod legitur, intellegendum dicens: an nescitis, quia patres nostri sub nube fuerunt et in Moysen baptizati sunt? nubes haec itaque significat doctrinam apostolicam, quae inumbrans et a calore defendens aestum omnem futuri iudicii excludit. quod autem a nouissimis terrae sint, audiamus apostolum dicentem: puto autem deus nos apostolos extremos ostendit sicut abortiuos. dominus ipse, cum de loco et dignitate inter discipulos sermo esset, ait: qui uoluerit in uobis esse primus, sit omnium nouissimus. has ergo nubes deus omnia, quae uult, faciens a nouissimis terrae educit, et hanc inumbrantem doctrinam terrae humilia exhalant.
The Lord, then, has done all that he willed in heaven and on earth, in the sea and in the depths. For in all these he held nothing before his man, for whose sake even his only-begotten, God, became man; and he did these things "bringing up clouds from the end of the earth." The Lord commanded the clouds not to rain on the thorny and unfruitful vineyard: "I will command the clouds," he says, "not to rain upon it." I know also a cloud in which God spoke: "In a pillar of cloud," it says, "he spoke to them." And Paul testifies to me that in this cloud not only what is read is to be understood, saying: "Do you not know that our fathers were under the cloud and were baptized into Moses?" This cloud, then, signifies the apostolic teaching, which, overshadowing and defending from the heat, shuts out all the burning of the future judgment. And that they are from the last of the earth, let us hear the apostle saying: "For I think God has displayed us apostles as last, like those born out of due time." The Lord himself, when there was talk about place and rank among the disciples, said: "Whoever wishes to be first among you, let him be last of all." These clouds, then, God, doing all that he wills, brings up from the last of the earth, and the lowly places of the earth breathe out this overshadowing teaching.
134.16CSEL 22:703–704
Fulgura in pluuias fecit. fulgur est uirtutis caelestis agnitio, et hoc ipse dominus testatur dicens: sicut enim fulgur exit ab oriente et paret usque ad occidentem, ita erit aduentus filii hominis. et hoc quidem ita in domino, qui non in locis, ut corporalia, sed ubique adueniens cernetur. ceterum in singulis hodie, quicumque uirtutem dei adnuntiabunt, qui cognitionem eius per doctrinam praestabunt, fulgura in pluuias facti sunt: fulgure primum ipsi scientiae coruscantes, tum deinde uerborum imbrem profundentes. et huius pluuiae ex se profundendse Moyses non iam spiritaliter per doctrinam, sed corporaliter per gloriam fulgens ita meminit: attende caelum, et loquar: et audiat terra uerba ex ore meo. expectetur sicut pluuia dictum meum, et descendant sicut ros uerba mea et sicut pluuia super gramen et ut niues super faenum. illa fulgura in has pluuias facta sunt, uerba scilicet uiuificantia et potantes inrigantia et peccaminum hieme arefacta excitantia.
"He made lightnings for the rains." Lightning is the recognition of heavenly power, and the Lord himself testifies to this, saying: "For as the lightning comes out of the east and appears even to the west, so will be the coming of the Son of Man." And this indeed is so in the Lord, who will be seen not in places, like bodily things, but coming everywhere. But today, in individuals, whoever will proclaim the power of God, whoever will offer the knowledge of him through teaching, have been made lightnings for rains: first flashing themselves with the lightning of knowledge, then pouring out a shower of words. And Moses, shining not now spiritually through teaching but bodily through glory, recalls this rain to be poured out from himself thus: "Attend, O heaven, and I will speak; and let the earth hear the words from my mouth. Let my saying be awaited like rain, and let my words come down like dew, and like rain upon the grass and like snow upon the hay." Those lightnings have been made into these rains: words that give life, water those who drink, and revive what has been dried up by the winter of sins.
134.17CSEL 22:704–705
Seruatus autem ordo est, ut post congregatas ex nouissimis terrae nubes, post fulgura in pluuias constituta producat uentos de thensauris suis. et quos de thensauris suis uentos producat. non ambiguum est, eos nempe, de quibus ait: faciens angelos suos spiritus. sunt enim angeli paruulorum cotidie deum uidentes. hi igitur spiritus ad salutem humani generis emissi sunt; neque enim infirmitas nostra nisi datis ad custodiam angelis tot tantisque spiritalium caelestium nequitiis obsisteret. opus ad id fuit naturae potioris auxilio; et hoc ita esse ex his dictis docemur, quibus trepidum ac pauentem Moysen dominus confirmat dicens: ecce angelus meus antecedet te. hos igitur de thensauris suis uentos producit [tribuens in his auxilium humanae infirmitati], ut haec nos diuina praesidia aduersus mundipotentes harum tenebrarum in hereditanda nobis salute tueantur.
The order has been kept, so that after the clouds gathered from the last of the earth, after the lightnings set for rains, he brings forth the winds out of his treasuries. And which winds he brings out of his treasuries is not doubtful: surely those of whom he says: "Making his angels spirits." For there are angels of the little ones who daily see God. These spirits, then, have been sent forth for the salvation of the human race; for our weakness could not withstand so many and such great heavenly spiritual wickednesses unless angels were given for our guard. For this the help of a stronger nature was needed; and that this is so we are taught by the words with which the Lord strengthens Moses, trembling and afraid, saying: "Behold, my angel will go before you." These winds, then, he brings out of his treasuries, so that these divine protections may guard us against the world-rulers of this darkness in inheriting salvation.
134.18CSEL 22:705
Sequitur deinde hic ordo dictorum: qui percussit primogenita Aegypti ab homine usque ad pecus et misit signa et prodigia in medio tui, Aegypte, in Pharaonem et in omnes seruos eius. qui percussit gentes multas et occidit reges fortes: Seon, regem Amorraeorum, et Og, regem Basan, et omnia regna Chanaan occidit: et dedit terram eorum hereditatem, hereditatem Israhel populo suo. frequenter sermo diuinus eum intellegendum esse deum caeli atque terrae et uniuersitatis creatorem docet, qui Aegyptum percusserit, mare diuiserit, Aegyptios demerserit, populum suum magnis et mirabilibus uirtutibus eduxerit, in eremo manna aluerit, eiectis gentibus in terram repromissionis induxerit. et quidem omnia haec magnifica et praeclara opera deum esse testantur; neque enim mediocris et moderatae uirtutis est tanta gessisse: admirandus in his intellegendus est. sed docet nos apostolus cum ueneratione gestorum prseformationem in his doctrinae atque operis spiritalis agnoscere, cum lex spiritalis est, cum gesta eius allegorumena sunt, cum sub nube patres fuerunt, cum in Moysen baptizati sunt, cum de spiritali petra biberunt, cum petra Christus est, cum postremo secundum exaltati in deserto serpentis formam exaltandus est dominus. ergo, licet illa in Aegypto corporaliter gesta sint, spiritaliter tamen nunc geruntur in nobis.
Then follows this order of words: "Who struck the firstborn of Egypt, from man to beast, and sent signs and wonders into your midst, O Egypt, upon Pharaoh and upon all his servants; who struck many nations and slew mighty kings: Sihon king of the Amorites, and Og king of Bashan, and all the kingdoms of Canaan he slew; and he gave their land as an inheritance, an inheritance to Israel his people." The divine word often teaches that he is to be understood as God of heaven and earth and creator of the universe who struck Egypt, divided the sea, drowned the Egyptians, led out his people with great and wonderful powers, fed them with manna in the desert, and, the nations being cast out, brought them into the land of promise. And indeed all these magnificent and splendid works testify that he is God; for it is not of ordinary and moderate power to have done such great things: he is to be understood as admirable in them. But the apostle teaches us, with veneration for the deeds, to recognize in them a prefiguring of spiritual teaching and work, since the law is spiritual, since its deeds are spoken allegorically, since the fathers were under the cloud, since they were baptized into Moses, since they drank from the spiritual rock, since the rock is Christ, since, finally, the Lord was to be lifted up after the pattern of the serpent lifted up in the desert. Although, then, those things were done bodily in Egypt, yet they are now done spiritually in us.
134.19CSEL 22:705–706
Aegyptus, in quo saeculi forma est, uirtutibus et plagis dei percutitur, signis portentisque terretur. plagis dei percutitur, cum iudicium suum audit, cum damnationem suam cognoscit, cum in ipso conscientiae suae reatu cotidie iudicatur, cum principales suas originariasque uirtutes cruci suae dominus confixit. locutus quoque est tamquam ad uiuentem animalemque Aegyptum, ut non hebetem terram inanimamque regionem, sed incolas eius. quos rationales animalesque constituerat, alloqui existimaretur: misit signa et prodigia in medio tui, Aegypte, in Pharaonem et in omnes seruos eius. in medio tui quid est? cognoscimus ex eo, quod dictum est: dominus deus autem, rex noster, rex ante saecula, operatus est salutem in medio orbis terrae. in medio itaque orbis terrae loco, in quo dominus salutem nobis operans passus est, signa et prodigia misit, dum crucis suae horis sol effugit, tremit terra, saxa rumpuntur, sepulcra panduntur, mortui exurgunt. haec in medio tui, Aegypte, signa facta sunt. Pharao tuus, id est diabolus aquis necatur baptizato populo, ipse cum exercitu suo obrutus; percussae deinde gentes multae, extincti scilicet innumerabiles in nobis uitiorum incolatus. reges quoque fortes perempti, fortes plane.
Egypt, in which is the figure of the world, is struck by the powers and plagues of God and terrified by signs and portents. It is struck by the plagues of God when it hears its judgment, when it learns its condemnation, when it is judged daily in the very guilt of its conscience, when the Lord nailed its principal and original powers to his cross. He also spoke as to a living and animate Egypt, so that he might be thought to address not a dull earth and lifeless region but its inhabitants, whom he had made rational and living: "He sent signs and wonders into your midst, O Egypt, upon Pharaoh and upon all his servants." What is "into your midst"? We learn it from the saying: "But the Lord God, our king, king before the ages, has worked salvation in the midst of the earth." In the middle place of the earth, then, in which the Lord suffered, working salvation for us, he sent signs and wonders, when in the hours of his cross the sun fled, the earth trembled, the rocks split, the tombs opened, the dead rose. These signs were done in your midst, O Egypt. Your Pharaoh, that is, the devil, is killed by the waters when the people is baptized, himself overwhelmed with his army; then many nations were struck, that is, the innumerable settlements of vices in us were extinguished. Mighty kings too were destroyed, mighty indeed.
134.20CSEL 22:706–707
Seon, regem Amorraeorum, et Og, regem Basan. et omnia regna Chanaan occidit. et quid istud est? tot regna euersa sunt, tot reges extincti sunt: et horum tantum fit memoria? fit quidem secundum gestorum fidem paucorum memoria ex plurium; sed hi tantum memorantur, in quibus, quamuis quidem res gesta cognosceretur, tamen per condiciones uirtutesque nominum spiritalis in his esset condicio subtexta. nam Seon infructuosae arboris interpretatio est — quod enim nobiscum arbor infructuosa, id hebraice Seon nuncupatur- Amorrseus uero exacerbantis. has ergo sub horum nominum significatione infructuosas in nobis exacerbantibus uirtutes deleuit, infructuosos scilicet principes, qui nos, qui exacerbabamus in dominum, obtinebant, et ob id secundum dictum euangelicum exemplo infructuosae arboris excisos. Og uero rex interpretationem habet maceriae siue ualli, Basan uero confusionis siue pudoris. regem hunc ergo confusionis pudorisque nostri extinxit, soluens secundum apostolum maceriam uel uallum, id est, quo a cognitione dei prohibebamur, obstaculum diruens. occidit deinde omnia regna Chanaan. Chanaan maledictum esse Genesis docet et esse seruum fratrum suorum ob contumeliosam eius in patrem iniuriam. interpretatio autem nominis Chanaan motio est. quse igitur nos in uitia et in maledictam impietatem commouebant atque in nos ui sua ac potestate regnabant, dominus extinxit. quod autem per uarias uirtutes, quae in filiis oboedientiae operantur, non regnent peccata in nobis, apostolum audiamus dicentem: non regnet amplius in mortali corpore uestro peccatum. regna ergo haec occisa sunt; iam enim non dominantur in nobis.
"Sihon king of the Amorites, and Og king of Bashan, and all the kingdoms of Canaan he slew." And what is this? So many kingdoms were overthrown, so many kings killed: and is mention made only of these? Mention is indeed made, according to the faithfulness of the deeds, of a few out of many; but only these are mentioned in whom, although the deed done was known, yet through the conditions and force of their names a spiritual condition was woven in. For Sihon means "fruitless tree" (what we call a fruitless tree is called Sihon in Hebrew), and Amorite means "one who embitters." Under the meaning of these names, then, he destroyed the fruitless powers in us who embittered him: the fruitless rulers, namely, who held us, who were embittering the Lord, and who were therefore cut down after the example of the fruitless tree, according to the Gospel saying. King Og means "wall" or "rampart," and Bashan "confusion" or "shame." He extinguished, then, this king of our confusion and shame, loosing, according to the apostle, the wall or rampart, that is, tearing down the obstacle by which we were kept from the knowledge of God. Then he slew all the kingdoms of Canaan. Genesis teaches that Canaan was cursed and was to be the servant of his brothers because of his insulting injury to his father. The name Canaan means "motion." What, then, moved us to vices and cursed impiety and reigned over us by their force and power, the Lord has extinguished. And that sins do not reign in us through the various powers that work in the sons of disobedience, let us hear the apostle saying: "Let sin no longer reign in your mortal body." These kingdoms, then, have been slain; for they no longer rule in us.
134.21CSEL 22:707–708
Sed occisis his quid consequitur? dedit terram eorum hereditatem, hereditatem Israhel populo suo. data quidem terra est regum et gentium superius memoratarum, sed amissa rursum est. hodie a gentibus incolitur, Israhel ubique exul est; et quomodo terra, quae data est, hereditas est? manet ergo idem ordo, ut sub his, quae corporaliter gesta sunt, ea, quae spiritaliter essent gerenda, praescripta sint. data igitur corporum nostrorum terra in hereditatem est, quse antea erat in Chanaan maledicta, in uitia mobilis, in Basan confusionis pudorisque plena, in Amorraeo exacerbans et inritans, quam possidebat in Og infidelitatis maceria, quam occupauerat in Seon arbor infructuosa. hsee igitur terra soluto infidelitatis uallo et excisa ex ea arbore infructuosa data est hereditas et data Israhel populo suo. quse autem haec hereditatis terra sit et qui sit hic Israhel, audiamus apostolum Paulum dicentem: sicut portauimus imaginem terrestris, portemus imaginem caelestis. hic est Israhel, cui terrae beatae huius continget hereditas, cui conglorificati in domino terreni corporis sui erit aeterna possessio. hoc Christianis est proprium, qui hoc in se nomen incolume per caelestis imaginem usque ad finem retinuerint.
But when these were slain, what follows? "He gave their land as an inheritance, an inheritance to Israel his people." The land of the kings and nations mentioned above was indeed given, but it was lost again. Today it is inhabited by Gentiles; Israel is everywhere an exile: and how is the land that was given an inheritance? The same order remains, then: under what was done bodily, what was to be done spiritually was prefigured. The land of our bodies, then, has been given as an inheritance, which before was cursed in Canaan, prone to vices, in Bashan full of confusion and shame, in the Amorite embittering and provoking, which in Og the wall of unbelief possessed, which in Sihon the fruitless tree had occupied. This land, then, the rampart of unbelief being loosed and the fruitless tree cut out of it, has been given as an inheritance, and given to Israel his people. What this land of inheritance is and who this Israel is, let us hear the apostle Paul saying: "As we have borne the image of the earthly, let us bear the image of the heavenly." This is the Israel to whom the inheritance of this blessed land will fall, to whom the possession of his earthly body, glorified together in the Lord, will be eternal. This is proper to Christians who keep this name unharmed in themselves to the end through the image of the heavenly.
134.22CSEL 22:708–709
Atque ita ait: domine, nomen tuum in saeculum. numquid a nobis optandum hoc deo est, aut aeterna uirtus eget uoto nostro, ut maneat in aeternum? ut in nobis potius maneat, optandum est; sicuti cum dicimus: sanctificetur nomen tuum, adueniat regnum tuum, fiat uoluntas tua in caelo et in terra, non utique, ut haec deo proueniant, optamus, ut sanctificetur, qui sanctus est, ut uoluntas sua fiat, cuius factum in uoluntate est: nostrae haec potius rei uota sunt, ut per egregia fidei nostrae opera nomen eius sanctificetur in nobis-ait enim: estote sancti, quoniam ego sanctus sum —, ut in nos regnum eius adueniat, et digni aeterno regno per indultam nobis aeternitatis substantiam simus — quia spes uitae est confiteri regnum eius, et dicenti sibi latroni: domine, memento mei, cum ueneris in regnum tuum, respondit: amen, dico tibi, hodie mecum eris in paradiso-. ut, sicut uoluntati eius in caelis ab indefessis et caelestibus uirtutibus paretur, ita et a nobis in terra pareatur, ne corporalis nos infirmitas ab exequenda eius uoluntate deflectat — in caelis enim indefessis cotidie uocibus dicitur: sanctus, sanctus, sanctus, dominus deus sabaoth, pleni sunt caeli et terra gloria tua, ut nobis quoque nihil aliud in opere sit per quod sanctificatur nomen eius, nihil aliud in spe, per quod et in nos regnum eius speramus, nihil aliud in uoluntate, per quod ei aeternae a nobis laudes sunt deferendae. profectus hic uoti nostri indigentiae res est, ut nobiscum nomen eius maneat in aeternum.
And so it says: "O Lord, your name is for ever." Is this to be wished by us for God, or does eternal power need our wish in order to remain for ever? Rather, we should wish that it remain in us; just as when we say, "Hallowed be your name, your kingdom come, your will be done in heaven and on earth," we certainly do not wish that these things should come to God, that he who is holy should be hallowed, that his will should be done whose deed is in his will. These are rather wishes for our own sake: that through the excellent works of our faith his name may be hallowed in us (for he says: "Be holy, for I am holy"); that his kingdom may come to us, and we may be worthy of the eternal kingdom through the substance of eternity granted us (because to confess his kingdom is the hope of life, and to the thief who said to him, "Lord, remember me when you come into your kingdom," he answered, "Amen I say to you, today you will be with me in paradise"); that, as his will is obeyed in heaven by the untiring heavenly powers, so it may be obeyed by us on earth, lest bodily weakness turn us aside from carrying out his will (for in heaven it is said daily with untiring voices: "Holy, holy, holy, Lord God of hosts, heaven and earth are full of your glory"); so that for us too there may be nothing else in our work but that by which his name is hallowed, nothing else in our hope but that by which we hope his kingdom will come to us, nothing else in our will but that by which eternal praises are to be offered him by us. The fruit of this prayer is a matter of our need: that his name may remain with us for ever.
134.23CSEL 22:709
Dehinc sequitur: et memoriale tuum in generatione et generationem. non, sicut saepe, a saeculo in saeculum neque a generationibus in generationes, sed in generatione et generationem. et hoc non de nomine, sed de memoriali memoriale enim est memoria operum dei, quae libro legis continentur. et quia lex et memoriale dei in generatione prima, Iudaeorum scilicet. usque in plenitudinem temporum mansit, sicuti plebi Sodomae et Gomorrae usque ad plenitudinem peccati poena dilata est, ita mensuram omnium impietatum cum prima generatio explesset, memoriale dei et omnium operum suorum memoria in generationem alteram transiit, in Christianos namque, cum quibus hodie legis ueneratio est et prophetiae et nomen domini.
Then follows: "And your memorial to generation and generation." Not, as often, from age to age, nor from generations to generations, but to generation and generation. And this is said not of the name but of the memorial. The memorial is the remembrance of the works of God contained in the book of the law. And since the law and memorial of God remained in the first generation, that of the Jews, until the fullness of times, just as punishment was postponed for the people of Sodom and Gomorrah until the fullness of sin, so when the first generation had filled up the measure of all impieties, the memorial of God and the remembrance of all his works passed to the other generation, namely to the Christians, with whom today is the veneration of the law and of prophecy and the name of the Lord.
134.24CSEL 22:709
Tenuit autem hunc eundem in consequentibus ordinem dicens: quia iudicabit dominus populum suum et in seruis suis consolabitur. differt iudicari et consolari et differt populus et seruus. in seruis autem consolatio, in populo uero iudicium est. populum dei Israhel secundum carnem nuncupatum esse, quis nescit? dictum autem ab apostolo est: qui in lege peccauerunt, per legem iudicabuntur. iudicabit ergo deus populum suum; sed in seruis suis consolabitur, nempe illis. de quibus dominus ait: qui credit in me, non iudicabitur, sed transiet de morte in uitam: qui autem non credit, iam iudicatus est consolabitur autem dominus iudicato Israhel in seruis suis. in omnibus enim fidelibus terrae solatium habebit ex damno.
He kept this same order in what follows, saying: "For the Lord will judge his people and be comforted in his servants." To be judged and to be comforted differ, and a people and a servant differ. In the servants is comfort, but in the people judgment. Who does not know that Israel according to the flesh is called the people of God? And it is said by the apostle: "Those who have sinned under the law will be judged by the law." God will judge his people, then; but he will be comforted in his servants, namely those of whom the Lord says: "He who believes in me will not be judged but will pass from death into life; but he who does not believe has already been judged." The Lord, Israel having been judged, will be comforted in his servants. For in all the faithful of the earth he will have comfort for his loss.
134.25CSEL 22:709–710
Voluisset enim populum suum, quem in patribus eorum Abraham et Isaac et Iacob elegerat, non iudicari: ob quem post diuersas plagas Aegyptum adflixerat, ob quem in columna ignis et nubis adstiterat, ob quem mare diuiserat, aquam e petra eiecerat, manna e caelo miserat, legem posuerat, ueniam tantis sacrilegiis indulserat, tot inreligiosorum regna deiecerat, prophetas miserat, unigenitum suum nasci hominem uoluerat; sed tot tantisque beneficiis populus ingratus et colonus uineae primus electus in ipsum dominum uineae parricidales manus intulit, deum, quantum in se est, crucifixum in homine mortificans. sed electi sunt serui, quibus uinea fructum eius reddentibus traderetur, in quibus dominus iudicato populo suo pietatis suae damnum consolaretur. itaque consolantur eum gentes in martyribus et confessoribus et fidelibus suis fructus ex se commissae sibi gratiae rependentes. non noua autem, nec huius tantum prophetae uox ista est. Moyses in praeclaro illo Deuteronomii cantico, cum peccata populi huius et impietates nouissimas et fidem generationis alterius praedicaret, ait: quoniam iudicabit dominus populum suum et in seruis suis consolabitur. sanctus etiam Eleazar, cum a principibus populi sui degustare ementitum sacrificatum cogeretur, gloriam martyrii sub hac eadem uoce consummat, sciens dominum in seruis suis uoluntatem eius operantibus iudicato populo consolandum.
For he would have wished his people, whom he had chosen in their fathers Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, not to be judged: for whose sake he had afflicted Egypt with various plagues, for whose sake he had stood by in the pillar of fire and cloud, for whose sake he had divided the sea, brought water from the rock, sent manna from heaven, given the law, granted pardon for such great sacrileges, cast down so many kingdoms of the irreligious, sent prophets, willed that his only-begotten be born a man. But the people, ungrateful for so many and such great benefits, and the first-chosen tenant of the vineyard, laid murderous hands on the very Lord of the vineyard, putting to death, so far as lay in them, God crucified in man. But servants were chosen, to whom the vineyard would be handed over as they rendered its fruit, in whom the Lord, his people having been judged, might be comforted for the loss of his kindness. So the nations comfort him in their martyrs, confessors, and faithful, paying back from themselves the fruits of the grace entrusted to them. This voice is not new, nor is it this prophet's alone. Moses, in that splendid song of Deuteronomy, when he was proclaiming the sins and last impieties of this people and the faith of another generation, says: "For the Lord will judge his people and be comforted in his servants." Holy Eleazar too, when he was being forced by the rulers of his people to taste a feigned sacrifice, consummates the glory of martyrdom under this same voice, knowing that the Lord, his people having been judged, would be comforted in his servants who do his will.
134.26CSEL 22:710–711
Conuertitur deinde ad depellendum errorem gentilium prophetico sermone, ut stultas atque inreligiosas superstitiones ex ipsis superstitionum causis coarguat dicens: simulacra gentium argentum et aurum, opera manuum hominum. os habent et non loquentur; oculos habent et non uidebunt; aures habent et non audient: nares habent et non odorabunt; manus habent et non palpabunt; pedes habent et non ambulabunt; non clamabunt in gutture suo neque est spiritus in ore eorum. similes illis fiant, qui faciunt ea et omnes, qui sperant in his. frequenter et in aliis psalmis id ipsum de simulacris gentium dictum est; et prophetia omnis hoc laborat, ut humanum errorem a stultissimis his inreligiositatum studiis auertat. addunt enim plerique his impietatibus suis auctoritatem, ut pretiis metallorum honorem diis, quos sibi fecerint, quaerant, auro eos argentoque formando; sed hoc tantum, quod possunt, largiuntur, imaginem scilicet oris, oculorum, aurium, narium, manuum et pedum, deos suos in forma mortui corporis adorantes, cui spiritu auolante os mutum est, oculi hebetes, aures surdae, nares inanimse sunt, manus dissolutae, pedes rigentes, omne corpus immobile est. sed errori eorum id, quod nec sperare audent, deputatur: ut eorum sint similes, quos adorant, uenerantes sint in consortio ueneratorum, ipsi simulacrorum modo emortua corpora sine uitae spiritu relinquendi.
Then with prophetic speech he turns to driving out the error of the Gentiles, refuting their foolish and irreligious superstitions from the very causes of the superstitions, saying: "The idols of the nations are silver and gold, the works of men's hands. They have a mouth and will not speak; they have eyes and will not see; they have ears and will not hear; they have nostrils and will not smell; they have hands and will not feel; they have feet and will not walk; they will not cry out with their throat, nor is there breath in their mouth. Let those who make them become like them, and all who trust in them." The same thing is often said in other psalms too about the idols of the nations; and all prophecy labors to turn human error away from these most foolish pursuits of irreligion. For many add authority to these impieties of theirs, seeking honor for the gods they have made for themselves by the value of the metals, forming them of gold and silver; but they bestow only what they can, namely the image of a mouth, eyes, ears, nostrils, hands, and feet, worshipping their gods in the form of a dead body, whose mouth, the spirit having flown, is mute, the eyes dull, the ears deaf, the nostrils lifeless, the hands slack, the feet stiff, the whole body motionless. But what they do not dare to hope is assigned to their error: that they should be like those they adore, the worshippers in fellowship with the worshipped, themselves to be left, like the idols, dead bodies without the breath of life.
134.27CSEL 22:711–713
Demonstrato autem errore gentili ad doctrinae ordinem propheticus sermo se rettulit dicens: domus Israhel benedicite dominum; domus Aaron, benedicite dominum; domus Leui, benedicite dominum; qui timetis dominum, benedicite eum. in his nominum atque officiorum distinctionibus omnem ecclesiae populum conplexus est, sed per nuncupationum et proprietatum significationem ipsa illa officiorum merita diuisit. in eo enim, quod dicitur domus Israhel et domus Aaron et domus Leui et qui timetis dominum, aliud ab alio esse discernitur, ut secundum apostolum ad Corinthios scribentem quaedam fit in nominibus distinctio, cum ait: uocatis, sanctis cum omnibus, qui inuocant nomen domini nostri Iesu Christi, ut aliud uocatos, aliud sanctos, aliud inuocantes nomen domini esse significet. nunc autem primum Israhel nuncupari uidemus, secundo Aaron, tertio Leui, quarto timentes dominum. et in Aaron sacerdotes significari non ambiguum est: sacerdos enim in lege Aaron primus fuit et exinde in successione eius sacerdotum honor mansit. in Leui autem ministros ostendi absolutum est: hsec enim tribus in ministerium electa est. reliquus autem populus, cui non sacerdotii neque ministerii, sed timoris officium est, in his, qui timent dominum, nuncupatur. docet autem nos apostolus, prae omnes hos esse Israhel, cum ait: et quotquot regulae huic obsecundabunt, pax super eos et misericordia, et super Israhel. sacerdotes et ministros officii sui regula in eo, quod agunt, continet; sed praestat longe uoluntate magis aliquid agere quam lege. et optimum est per ministerii ordinem non solum satisfacere ministerio, sed per doctrinae scientiam et fidei calorem ad cognitionem dei contemplationemque contendere. eum ergo, qui deum intellegens et uidens esset, quod est proprium Israhel, in primo benedicentium ordine conlocauit, qui officium, in quo esset, atque honorem sacerdotis hac ipsa cogniti per fidem et contemplati dei uirtute praecelleret: quia, cum plures sint Aaron, id est sacerdotes, pauci tamen Israhel, id est qui cognitione mentis deum contemplaturi sint, reperientur. hi ergo primum ad benedicendum aduocantur, ceteris aliis post eos in eo, quo et ipsi essent, officio benedicturis. sed benedicunt deum et domus Israhel et domus Aaron et domus Leui et omnes, qui timent dominum, eum scilicet, qui est benedictus deus ex Sion, qui habitat Hierusalem, sanctum montem Sion et ciuitatem caelestem. ecclesiam primitiuorum, manentium et scriptorum in caelis, in domino nostro Iesu Christo, qui est benedictus in saecula saeculorum. amen.
Having shown the Gentile error, the prophetic speech returned to the order of teaching, saying: "House of Israel, bless the Lord; house of Aaron, bless the Lord; house of Levi, bless the Lord; you who fear the Lord, bless him." In these distinctions of names and offices he has embraced the whole people of the church, but through the meaning of the names and their proper senses he has divided the merits of the offices themselves. For in saying "house of Israel" and "house of Aaron" and "house of Levi" and "you who fear the Lord," one is distinguished from another, just as the apostle, writing to the Corinthians, makes a certain distinction in names when he says: "to the called, to the saints, with all who call on the name of our Lord Jesus Christ," signifying that the called are one thing, the saints another, those who call on the name of the Lord another. Now we see Israel named first, Aaron second, Levi third, those who fear the Lord fourth. And there is no doubt that the priests are signified in Aaron: for Aaron was the first priest in the law, and from then on the honor of priests remained in his succession. In Levi the ministers are plainly shown: for this tribe was chosen for the ministry. The rest of the people, whose duty is not priesthood or ministry but fear, is named in "those who fear the Lord." But the apostle teaches us that Israel is above all these, when he says: "And as many as follow this rule, peace be upon them, and mercy, and upon the Israel of God." The rule of their office holds the priests and ministers in what they do; but it is far better to do something by will than by law. And the best thing is, through the order of ministry, not only to satisfy the ministry but, through the knowledge of teaching and the warmth of faith, to strive toward the knowledge and contemplation of God. He placed, then, in the first rank of those who bless, him who would understand and see God, which is proper to Israel, and who would excel the office in which he was and the honor of the priest by this very power of God known by faith and contemplated: because, although there are many Aarons, that is, priests, few Israels, that is, those who will contemplate God with the knowledge of the mind, will be found. These, then, are called first to bless, the others after them to bless in the office in which they themselves are. But the house of Israel, the house of Aaron, the house of Levi, and all who fear the Lord bless God: him, namely, who is the blessed God out of Zion, who dwells in Jerusalem, the holy mount Zion and heavenly city, the church of the firstborn, abiding and enrolled in heaven, in our Lord Jesus Christ, who is blessed for ever and ever. Amen.
Tractates 135
135.1CSEL 22:713
Non est otiosus propheticus sermo neque ex inanibus ac superfluis causis spiritalis loquela est. si enim in uiris prudentibus expectari id maxime solet, ut ea, quae loquuntur, grauitate eorum doctrinaque digna sint omnisque sermo non sit fortuitus et uagus, sed ex rationabilibus causis profectus et expectationi audientium utilis et auctoritati congruus disserentium, quanto magis id in caelestibus eloquiis opinandum est, ut quidquid in his est, excelsum, diuinum, rationabile et perfectum esse existimetur. sed plerumque, immo semper, uitio nostro accidit, ut, quae legi in ecclesia audiamus, auribus atque animis nostris longe ab his peregrinantibus neglegamus, ut per audiendi incuriam uilescat apud nos dictorum caelestium dignitas. cum in lectionis tempore rationes supputamus, iras concipimus, iniurias cogitamus, luxus recolimus, stupra meditamur, tunc ad haec occupatis nobis surdae aures sunt et hebes mens est; et si quid forte in aures nostras eorum, quae leguntur, inciderit, uirtutem tamen dictorum obrutus saeculi curis animus non sentit; et quorum intellegentiam non consequitur, leuem existimabit auctoritatem.
Prophetic speech is not idle, nor does spiritual utterance arise from empty and superfluous causes. For if in prudent men it is especially expected that what they say should be worthy of their gravity and learning, and that all their speech should not be random and wandering but should proceed from rational causes, be useful to the expectation of the hearers and fitting to the authority of the speakers, how much more must we think this of the heavenly oracles, so that whatever is in them is held to be lofty, divine, rational, and perfect. But often, indeed always, it happens through our fault that we neglect what we hear read in the church, our ears and minds wandering far from it, so that through carelessness in listening the dignity of the heavenly sayings grows cheap among us. When during the time of the reading we reckon accounts, conceive anger, think of injuries, recall luxuries, plot acts of sexual immorality, then, occupied with these things, our ears are deaf and our mind dull; and if perhaps something of what is read falls into our ears, yet the mind, buried by the cares of the world, does not feel the force of the sayings; and it will think light the authority of things whose understanding it does not attain.
135.2CSEL 22:713–714
Omnia autem, quae in libris propheticis sunt, maximum humanitati et salutis et doctrinae profectum in se habent, nostrique causa uniuersa scripta sunt, ut nunc nobis institutionem uitae innocentis adferrent, nunc scientiam dei intimarent, nunc originis naturaeque nostrae cognitionem tribuerent, nunc futurorum intellegentiam non spe tantum, sed ratione praestarent, nunc causae uniuersitatis huius ortusque proferrent et humanum sensum tantarum rerum intellegentise incapacem ad capiendam horum cognitionem uariis doctrinae generibus distenderent. partibus enim quibusdam et diuisionibus opus fuit, per quas sensim sub usu exercitationis adsiduo opinio saltem inconprehensibilis nobis huius intellegentiae posset inrepere. plures prophetae sunt, et ingentia eorum copiosaque dicta sunt plures etiam psalmi sunt, et singulis multa et uaria congesta sunt. et quamquam omnes unam atque eandem in se doctrinae formam conplectantur, diuersis tamen institutis in eandem nos scientiae uiam dirigunt, non omnia in unum congerentes — incapaces enim omnium sumus —, sed partes partibus explicantes, ut per id, quod singula cognoscuntur, proficiatur ad multa. in hoc autem psalmo, quia singulis eiusdem rei argumenta diuersa sunt, id continetur, ut causam uniuersitatis huius, id est, cur caelum, cur terra, cur homines, cur cetera sint, ex bonitate ac misericordia dei profectam intellegamus per id, quod dicitur: confitemini domino: quoniam bonus, quoniam in saeculum misericordia eius.
All that is in the prophetic books holds for humanity the greatest advance in salvation and teaching, and all of it was written for our sake: now to bring us instruction in an innocent life, now to convey knowledge of God, now to give understanding of our origin and nature, now to offer understanding of things to come not by hope only but by reason, now to set forth the causes and origin of this universe, and to stretch human sense, incapable of understanding such great things, by various kinds of teaching so as to grasp knowledge of them. For there was need of certain parts and divisions, through which, gradually, by constant use and exercise, at least an opinion of this understanding, incomprehensible to us, might creep in. There are many prophets, and their sayings are vast and abundant; there are also many psalms, and many and varied things are gathered in each. And although all embrace one and the same form of teaching, yet by different instructions they direct us into the same way of knowledge, not heaping everything into one (for we are incapable of all), but explaining parts by parts, so that through knowing single things progress may be made to many. In this psalm, since the arguments for each point of the same matter are different, this is contained: that we should understand the cause of this universe, that is, why heaven, why earth, why men, why the rest exist, to have proceeded from the goodness and mercy of God, through what is said: "Confess to the Lord, for he is good, for his mercy is for ever."
135.3CSEL 22:714–715
Ac primum in eo, quod ita coeptum est: confitemini domino, duplicis intellegentise significatio adfertur: ut aut deum in confessione laudemus, quia bonus, quia misericordia eius in saecula sit, aut peccata nostra confiteamur ei ab eo indulgenda, quia bonus et cuius indeficiens misericordia sit. utrumque naturae nostrae conueniens, ut et eum, ad cuius cognitionem nascimur, laudemus, et ei, qui bonus et misericors in saecula sit, confiteamur peccata sub agnitione peccati. non enim confessio est deo, qui nihil ignoret, ea, quae gesseris, confiteri, quia professione ista deus non eget, cuius cognitioni nihil occultum est, cuius aditui nihil inuium est, cuius uirtuti nihil relicum est, extra quem locus nullus est; sed confessio est rei scilicet eius, quae ignorabatur, professa cognitio, ex alterius iudicii opinione in alterius intellegentiae proficiens sententiam. utile enim sibi ac iucundum quisquam esse antea existimauerat rapere, caedere, furari, superbire, potare, scortari; sed ubi haec omnia aeternae damnationi obnoxia esse cognouit, cognitis his confitetur errorem. confessio autem erroris professio est desinendi. desinendum ergo a peccato est, ob quod peccati coepta confessio est. ceterum extra ueniam est, qui peccatum cognouit nec cognitum confitetur.
And first, in its beginning, "Confess to the Lord," a double sense is brought: either that we should praise God in confession, because he is good, because his mercy is for ever; or that we should confess our sins to him, to be forgiven by him, because he is good and his mercy unfailing. Both suit our nature: that we should praise him for the knowledge of whom we are born, and that we should confess our sins, acknowledging them as sin, to him who is good and merciful for ever. For it is not confession to confess what you have done to God, who is ignorant of nothing, since God does not need this declaration, to whose knowledge nothing is hidden, to whose approach nothing is impassable, to whose power nothing is left over, outside whom there is no place; but confession is the declared knowledge of a thing that was unknown, advancing from the opinion of one judgment to the sentence of another understanding. Someone had formerly thought it useful and pleasant to rob, to kill, to steal, to be proud, to drink, to go with prostitutes; but when he learned that all these are liable to eternal damnation, having learned them he confesses his error. And confession of error is a declaration of ceasing. One must cease, then, from the sin for whose sake the confession of sin has begun. But he is beyond pardon who has learned his sin and does not confess it once learned.
135.4CSEL 22:715–716
Confitendum autem semper est, non quod peccandum semper sit, ut semper sit confitendum, sed quia peccati ueteris et antiqui utilis sit indefessa confessio. docet autem spiritus sanctus semper confitendum, cum ait per prophetam: iustus ipse sibi accusator est in primo sermone suo. iustus non se ex praesentibus, sed ex praeteritis accusat; cui enim adest praesentium accusatio, iusti nomen aufertur. et audiamus se apostolum Paulum ex praeteritis arguentem, cum ait: quia non sum dignus uocari apostolus, propter quod persecutus sum ecclesiam dei. gratia autem dei sum, quod sum. haec est illa iusti uiri uera confessio, quae iustitiam praesentem ex praeteritorum conscientia et confessione commendat. ad quam et alibi per prophetam monemur: confitere, inquit, peccata prior, ut iustificeris. ad hanc ergo confessionem in psalmo uocamur: quoniam deus bonus est, quoniam in saecula misericordia eius, confessionis nostrae hinc inpensiore maxime fide, quia, cui confitemur, et bonus est et nescit misericors esse desinere.
We must always confess, not because we must always sin, so as always to have to confess, but because untiring confession of old and former sin is useful. The Holy Spirit teaches that we must always confess when he says through the prophet: "The righteous man is his own accuser in the first of his speech." The righteous man accuses himself not of present things but of past ones; for from one who is liable to accusation for present things the name of righteous is taken away. And let us hear the apostle Paul reproving himself for past things, when he says: "For I am not worthy to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the church of God. But by the grace of God I am what I am." This is that true confession of the righteous man, which commends present righteousness by the consciousness and confession of the past. To this we are also admonished elsewhere through the prophet: "Confess your sins first," he says, "that you may be justified." To this confession, then, we are called in the psalm, "for God is good, for his mercy is for ever," our confession having from this the most earnest faith, because he to whom we confess is both good and does not know how to cease being merciful.
135.5CSEL 22:716
Confitemini deo deorum; quoniam in saecula misericordia eius. ut in euangeliis responsione domini ad Sadducseos docemur, non est deus mortuorum, sed uiuorum, per quem et dictum est: ego dixi, dii estis et filii excelsi omnes. non dignatur deus corruptibilium et mortuorum deus esse, sed eorum, qui in caelestem gloriam transformandi, exuti uetere homine terreno nouum eum, qui in caelis est, induerunt, qui conformes erunt corpori gloriae dei. et deos hos effici, licet et fidei eorum meritum exigat, tamen ea maxima causa est, quoniam in saecula misericordia eius. non ille eguit deorum deus nuncupari, sed bonitatis et misericordiae suse est, ut deos faciat honorem nominis sui ex adfectu misericordiae et bonitatis inpertiens.
"Confess to the God of gods, for his mercy is for ever." As we are taught in the Gospels by the Lord's answer to the Sadducees, he is not the God of the dead but of the living; through him it was also said: "I said, you are gods, and all sons of the Most High." God does not deign to be the God of the corruptible and the dead, but of those who, to be transformed into heavenly glory, have stripped off the old earthly man and put on the new one who is in heaven, who will be conformed to the body of God's glory. And although the merit of their faith requires that these be made gods, yet the greatest cause is "for his mercy is for ever." He did not need to be called God of gods, but it belongs to his goodness and mercy to make gods, imparting the honor of his name from the disposition of mercy and goodness.
135.6CSEL 22:716–718
Confitemini domino dominorum: quoniam in saecula misericordia eius. deos plures nuncupari siue in caelo, siue in terra apostolus docuit. ut non solum humanae naturae istud, sed spiritali conpetere uideretur, cum ait: sed etsi sunt dii, qui nominantur, in caelo et in terra, per caeli et terrae significationem utrique naturae nomen hoc conpetens esse demonstrans. idem quoque apostolus deum dominum dominorum significat, cum ait: rex regum et dominus dominantium; dominatus in uiles et in degeneres indignus deo est. rex ille regum est et dominus dominorum, ut est deus deorum. et deos quidem quos significet, non ambiguum est; de quibus dixit: deus stetit in synagoga deorum. reges autem idem apostolus absolute ostendit dicens: iam sine nobis regnatis, et utinam regnaretis. reges sunt, in quos non regnat peccatum, qui dominantur corporis sui, quibus est iam huius subditae et subiectae sibi carnis imperium. hi ergo reges sunt, et horum deus rex est. hi etiam domini sunt, qui non erunt serui peccati: quia qui facit peccatum, seruus est peccati. dominandum ergo peccato est, non seruiendum. domini autem sunt, qui haec peccati corpora dominationi suae per subiectionem uitiorum suorum peccatorumque subdunt. nouit se esse apostolus corporis sui dominum, cum ait: subicio enim mihi corpus meum et in seruitutem redigo. qui in seruitutem redigit, domini necesse est iure in seruitutem eum, qui seruiturus est, redigit. horum ergo talium dominorum deus dominus est, uocans eos per spem aeternitatis, ut domini sint, ut his dominis deus dominus sit: et hoc non ob aliam causam nisi ob id, quia in saecula misericordia eius: donans nobis per aeternae misericordiae suae benignitatem, ut, effectis nobis dominis, digni simus, quorum ipse sit dominus.
"Confess to the Lord of lords, for his mercy is for ever." The apostle taught that many are called gods, whether in heaven or on earth, so that this might seem to belong not only to human nature but also to spiritual nature, when he says: "But even if there are those called gods, in heaven and on earth," showing by the meaning of heaven and earth that this name belongs to both natures. The same apostle also signifies God as Lord of lords, when he says: "King of kings and Lord of lords." Lordship over the base and degenerate is unworthy of God. He is King of kings and Lord of lords, as he is God of gods. And whom he means by gods is not doubtful: of them he said, "God stood in the synagogue of gods." And the same apostle plainly shows the kings, saying: "Already without us you reign; and would that you did reign!" Kings are those over whom sin does not reign, who rule their own body, who already have command over this flesh made subject and subdued to them. These, then, are kings, and God is the king of these. These too are lords, who will not be servants of sin: for he who commits sin is the servant of sin. Sin, then, must be ruled, not served. And they are lords who subject these bodies of sin to their rule by subduing their vices and sins. The apostle knew he was lord of his body when he says: "For I subdue my body and bring it into servitude." He who brings into servitude must by a lord's right bring into servitude the one who is to serve. Of such lords, then, God is the Lord, calling them through the hope of eternity to be lords, so that God may be Lord of these lords: and this for no other reason than "for his mercy is for ever," granting us through the kindness of his eternal mercy that, being made lords, we may be worthy to have him as our Lord.
135.7CSEL 22:718
Qui fecit mirabilia magna solus. in plurimis quidem humanorum operum gestis multa magna et mirabilia extiterunt, sed quidquid in his gestum est, ad eum refertur, cuius uirtus illa gessit. multa mirabilia Moyses in Aegypto egit; sed testimonium magi incantatoresque perhibent, quia in operibus illis digitus dei est, sicut scriptum est: dixerunt ergo incantatores Pharaoni: digitus dei est hoc. ex quo ostenditur uirtutem dei per Moysen operatam fuisse, cuius tum illa ministerio gerebantur. magni quoque miraculi illud fuit tum, cum dicente Iesu Naue sol stetit contra Gabaon et luna contra uallem Elom. nescio, quid hoc mirabilius effici possit, cum in uerbo hominis sol et luna in diei unius moram ex cursus sui lege detenti sunt. sed uirtutis huius auctorem scriptura mox addidit dicens: non fuit dies talis neque prius neque postea, ut sic exaudiret deus hominem: quia dominus expugnauit in Israhel. in eo enim, quod Iesus exauditus est et pugnabat deus in Israhel, uirtus eius in gestis, qui et pugnabat et exaudiuit, ostenditur.
"Who alone has done great wonders." In very many deeds of human works many great and wonderful things have appeared, but whatever was done in them is referred to him whose power did them. Moses did many wonders in Egypt; but the magicians and enchanters bear witness that the finger of God is in those works, as it is written: "So the enchanters said to Pharaoh: This is the finger of God." From this it is shown that the power of God worked through Moses, by whose ministry those things were then done. That too was a great wonder when, at the word of Joshua son of Nun, the sun stood still over Gibeon and the moon over the valley of Aijalon. I do not know what more wonderful could be done than that, at the word of a man, the sun and moon were held back from the law of their course for the delay of one day. But Scripture at once added the author of this power, saying: "There was no day like it before or after, that God should so hear a man: for the Lord fought for Israel." For in that Joshua was heard and God fought for Israel, his power is shown in the deeds, he who both fought and heard.
135.8CSEL 22:718–719
Qui fecit caelos in intellectu: quoniam in saecula misericordia eius. faciendorum caelorum sola misericordia suae causa est; neque enim eguit, ut fierent. sed qui bonus est, in id uniuersa fecit, ut plures bonitatis suae copiis uterentur. fecit autem caelos in intellectu, non inrationabiles, neque informes, neque confusos et inordinatos. sed cum regionem cognitionis suae qui infinitus est collocaret, caelo superiore atque primo eadem cum ratione collocato terminum quendam uirtutibus, quae primae ad cognoscendum se gignerentur, inclusit. neque enim gignendae creationes uirtutem inconspicabilis dei ferre potuissent, nisi naturae temperatioris obiectu sedem hanc moderatae ad infirmitatem habitationis incolerent. aquis etenim eleuatis ipsam illam primi caeli naturam temperauit, quae superni dei accensa uirtute nequaquam ab inferioribus esset patienda naturis.
"Who made the heavens in understanding, for his mercy is for ever." His mercy alone is the cause of making the heavens; for he did not need them to be made. But he who is good made all things so that many might enjoy the riches of his goodness. He made the heavens in understanding, not irrational, nor shapeless, nor confused and disordered. But when he who is infinite set up the region of knowledge of himself, the higher and first heaven being placed with the same reason, he enclosed a certain boundary for the powers that were first begotten to know him. For the creatures to be begotten could not have borne the power of the invisible God unless, by the interposition of a more tempered nature, they inhabited this seat of a dwelling moderated to their weakness. For by the waters raised up he tempered that very nature of the first heaven, which, kindled by the power of the God above, could in no way have been endured by lower natures.
135.9CSEL 22:719
Caelum uero inferius non uniforme, sed multiplex tetendit; quod totum firmamentum nuncupans ualida ad sustentationem aquarum superiorum temperationemque aeris nostri firmitate solidauit. et idcirco plures caelos doctrina prophetica prodidit, quia necessarium naturae nostrae fuit, per momenta quaedam et profectus rationabilium moderationum regionem hanc indulti nobis ad praesens habitaculi temperari.
The lower heaven he stretched out not uniform but manifold; calling it all the firmament, he made it solid with a strong firmness for sustaining the upper waters and tempering our air. And therefore prophetic teaching has handed down many heavens, because it was necessary for our nature that this region of the dwelling granted us for the present be tempered by certain stages and advances of rational moderation.
135.10CSEL 22:719–720
De numero uero caelorum nihil sibi humanae doctrinae temeritas prsesumat. apostolus usque ad tertium tantum caelum sese raptum intellegit. plures quidem thronos, dominatus, potestates, principatus connumerat, quibus necesse est proprias sedes habitationis congruae deputari. sed et alia, quorum cognitionem futuris temporibus promittit, esse significat, cum ait: et super omne nomen, quod nominatur, non solum in hoc saeculo, sed etiam in futuro. sed de numero apostolus nihil docuit; et nescio an tacuerit, an ignorauerit. nunc enim et professus est se ex parte cognoscere, et tamen, cum raptus ad cselos est, audisse se, quae non sint loquenda, testatur. nobis sufficit plures caelos scire esse, quippe cum et caeli caelorum et aquae, quae super caelos sunt, laudent dominum.
But about the number of the heavens let the rashness of human teaching presume nothing. The apostle understands that he was caught up only as far as the third heaven. He counts many thrones, dominions, powers, principalities, to whom proper seats of fitting habitation must be assigned. But he also signifies that there are other things, knowledge of which he promises for future times, when he says: "and above every name that is named, not only in this age but also in the age to come." But about the number the apostle taught nothing; and I do not know whether he kept silent or did not know. For he both professed that he knows in part, and yet testifies that when he was caught up to the heavens he heard things that are not to be spoken. It is enough for us to know that there are many heavens, since both the heavens of heavens and the waters that are above the heavens praise the Lord.
135.11CSEL 22:720
Sub inferiore autem superioris circuli cselo, quod firmamentum nuncupauit, terram inferius collocauit; quam mediam suspendens et confirmans ita manendi sede moderatus est, ut paribus undique mensuris ponderibusque librata et substrata consisteret, ut is, qui infinitus est deus, primo illi superioris caeli circulo supereminens aequalibus ex omni transfusione sua spatiis omnia, uirtutis suae spiritu in usum ac naturam animantium temperato ea, quae crearentur, attingeret. apostolus enim ait: quia in ipso enim uiuimus et mouemur et sumus; per quod ostenditur, terram in spiritu eius, tamquam in transfusi spiritus ambitu, constitisse, cum in deo omnes et uiuamus et moueamur et simus. quod autem in omnia temperationis spiritu transfusus et penetrans sit, docet propheta dicens: spiritus dei repleuit orbem terrarum; itaque intus atque extra, ambitu atque aditu et circumfusus et transfusus ostenditur.
Beneath the lower heaven of the higher circle, which he called the firmament, he set the earth below; suspending it in the middle and making it firm, he so ordered its seat of remaining that it might stand balanced and supported by equal measures and weights on every side, so that God, who is infinite, rising above that first circle of the higher heaven, might reach the things that were created with equal distances from all his pouring-through, the Spirit of his power being tempered for the use and nature of living things. For the apostle says: "For in him we live and move and are"; by which it is shown that the earth stands in his Spirit, as in the circuit of a Spirit poured through, since in God we all live and move and are. And that he is poured through and penetrates all things with a tempering Spirit, the prophet teaches, saying: "The Spirit of God has filled the world"; so he is shown within and without, by circuit and by entry, both poured around and poured through.
135.12CSEL 22:720–721
Quod autem terra non sit in unam demersa regionem, consequenter spiritus sanctus ostendit dicens: qui firmauit terram super aquam: quoniam in saeculum misericordia eius. altius nos quaerere ratio tractatus praesentis et loci non sinit. satis sit terram super aquas pendula firmitate consistere, ex prophetica auctoritate didicisse, inumbratam caeli temperatioris obtentu, hoc firmamento, quod extensum tamquam pellis et solidatum tamquam fumus aquas supernas infernasque discernat. certe aquis pendulam contineri et in hoc, sicut in omnibus, ea causa est, quoniam in saecula misericordia eius.
That the earth is not sunk into one region, the Holy Spirit shows next, saying: "Who made firm the earth upon the water, for his mercy is for ever." The plan of the present treatise and place does not allow us to inquire more deeply. Let it be enough to have learned from prophetic authority that the earth stands with a hanging firmness upon the waters, overshadowed by the covering of a more tempered heaven, by this firmament, which, stretched out like a skin and made solid like smoke, separates the upper and lower waters. Certainly, that it is held hanging over the waters, in this as in everything the cause is "for his mercy is for ever."
135.13CSEL 22:721
In eo autem, quod sequitur: qui fecit luminaria magna solus: quoniam in saecula misericordia eius, non id intellegendum est, ut extra sapientiam et uerbum et uirtutem, id est unigenitum deum dominum nostrum Iesum Christum ea fecisse credatur, quippe qui ex persona sapientiae dixerit: ego eram apud eum disponens. sed qui disponebat, ab eo, cum quo disponebat, et genitus et natus est. cum autem opera filii opera patris sint, et pater operetur in filio et per id enim, quod ait: pater, qui in me est, ipse opera sua facit et rursum: ego opera patris facio, solus operatur in eo et per eum operando, quem genuit.
In what follows, "Who alone made the great lights, for his mercy is for ever," it is not to be understood that he is believed to have made them apart from his Wisdom and Word and Power, that is, the only-begotten God, our Lord Jesus Christ, since he said in the person of Wisdom: "I was with him, arranging." But he who was arranging was begotten and born from him with whom he arranged. And since the works of the Son are the works of the Father, the Father too works in the Son, through his saying, "The Father who is in me, he does his works," and again, "I do the works of the Father": he alone works in him and through him, working by the one whom he begot.
135.14CSEL 22:721–722
In ceteris uero absoluta ostendendae misericordiae dei doctrina est, ut sciamus omnia non ob aliam causam, nisi quia semper deus misericors sit, esse perfecta. de his autem, quae de Aegypti negotiis intellegi spiritaliter oportent, tractatus psalmi anterioris, in quantum exsequi ualuimus, conplexus est; ad quorum confirmationem etiam hoc, quod in psalmo hoc dictum est, accedit: qui diuisit mare rubrum in diuisiones: quoniam in saecula misericordia eius. unam diuisionem rubri maris liber Exodi docet dicens: et fecit mare siccum, et diuisa est aqua; et quomodo nunc rubrum mare in diuisiones diuiditur? nisi quia existimo sub relatione gestorum spiritalis doctrinae ordinem contineri. euadentes enim Aegyptum, quae saeculi forma est, et ad terram repromissionis, quam secundum euangelium beati hereditabunt, euntes per rubrum mare, id est per eiusdem huius saeculi turbidos aestus et fluctuantes motus transibimus, in quo plures ad iter diuisiones sunt. aliis enim per ieiunia iter est, aliis per pudicitiam, aliis per eleemosynam, per fidem, per spem, per caritatem. et haec omnia diuersas necesse est habeant diuisiones huius maris transeundi, omnibus tamen per has uiarum diuisiones iter saeculi transituris.
In the rest, the teaching of showing God's mercy is plain, so that we may know that all things have been accomplished for no other reason than that God is always merciful. The treatise on the previous psalm has covered, so far as we were able to carry it out, what ought to be understood spiritually concerning the affairs of Egypt; and to confirm them this too, said in this psalm, is added: "Who divided the Red Sea into divisions, for his mercy is for ever." The book of Exodus teaches one division of the Red Sea, saying: "And he made the sea dry, and the water was divided"; and how is the Red Sea now divided into divisions? Only, I think, because under the account of deeds an order of spiritual teaching is contained. For escaping from Egypt, which is the figure of the world, and going toward the land of promise, which according to the Gospel the blessed will inherit, we shall pass through the Red Sea, that is, through the turbulent surges and tossing motions of this same world, in which there are many divisions for the journey. For some the way is through fasting, for others through chastity, for others through almsgiving, through faith, through hope, through love. And all these must have different divisions for crossing this sea, all, however, about to cross the journey of the world through these divisions of ways.
135.15CSEL 22:722–723
Conclusio autem psalmi, ut haec omnia de futuris intellegantur, maiore fide firmat, cum ait: in humilitate nostra memor fuit nostri dominus: quoniam in saecula misericordia eius. et redemit nos de manu inimicorum nostrorum: quoniam in saecula misericordia eius. qui dat escam omni carni: quoniam in saecula misericordia eius. confitemini deo caeli: quoniam in saecula misericordia eius. non enim tantum memor fuit humilitatis humanae deus, cum ad liberandum populum ex Aegypto Moysen ducem legit, sed perfectius memor fuit humilitatis nostrae, cum ipsam humilitatem nostram corporeus natus adsumpsit, cum hoc humile terrenumque corpus gloria in se naturae caelestis absorpsit. neque tunc redemit de manu inimicorum, cum eos a dominatu Aegyptiorum exemit — nam postea inimicis subditi sunt et hodie iure alieni imperii cohercentur — sed redemit nos, cum se pro peccatis nostris dedit, redemit nos per sanguinem suum, per passionem suam, per mortem suam, per resurrectionem suam. hsec magna uitae nostrae pretia sunt. magno enim, ait apostolus, redempti estis, et redempti ab inimicis, a diabolo, ab angelis eius, a filio perditionis, a principibus aeris, a mundi potentibus, ab inimica morte. et redemit dando escam omni carni: qui dat escam omni carni. omni carni, id est quse redempta est, dat escam incorruptam, aeternam, panis uiui, panis cselestis. et in his singulis, quod humilitatis nostrae memor est, quod redempti sumus, quod omnis redemptorum caro escam accipit, ea causa est: quoniam in saeculum est misericordia eius; ob quod ei confitendum: confitemini deo caeli, quoniam in sseculum misericordia eius. quod caelum, quod terra, quod cetera sunt, et ipsum illud, quod sumus, qui non fuimus, quod erimus, quod non sumus, causam aliam non habet nisi misericordise dei: quia ad consortium bonorum suorum nasci nos uoluit ille, qui bonus est. unus enim bonus est, ait dominus noster Iesus Christus, qui est benedictus in saecula saeculorum. amen.
The conclusion of the psalm confirms with greater faith that all these things are to be understood of the future, when it says: "In our lowliness the Lord remembered us, for his mercy is for ever; and he redeemed us from the hand of our enemies, for his mercy is for ever; who gives food to all flesh, for his mercy is for ever. Confess to the God of heaven, for his mercy is for ever." For God did not only remember human lowliness when he chose Moses as leader to free the people from Egypt, but he remembered our lowliness more perfectly when, born in a body, he took our very lowliness upon himself, when the glory of the heavenly nature absorbed this lowly and earthly body into itself. Nor did he redeem them from the hand of their enemies then, when he freed them from the rule of the Egyptians (for afterward they were subjected to enemies, and today they are held under the right of another's rule); but he redeemed us when he gave himself for our sins; he redeemed us by his blood, by his passion, by his death, by his resurrection. These are the great prices of our life. "For you were bought," says the apostle, "at a great price": and bought from enemies, from the devil, from his angels, from the son of perdition, from the princes of the air, from the world-rulers, from the enemy death. And he redeemed by giving food to all flesh: "who gives food to all flesh." To all flesh, that is, that has been redeemed, he gives incorruptible, eternal food, of the living bread, the heavenly bread. And in each of these, that he remembers our lowliness, that we have been redeemed, that all the flesh of the redeemed receives food, the cause is "for his mercy is for ever"; for which reason we must confess to him: "Confess to the God of heaven, for his mercy is for ever." That heaven, that earth, that the rest exist, and that very fact that we exist who did not exist, that we will be what we are not, has no other cause than the mercy of God: because he who is good willed us to be born for fellowship in his good things. "For one is good," says our Lord Jesus Christ, who is blessed for ever and ever. Amen.
Tractates 136
136.1CSEL 22:723–724
Captos secundum Hieremiae prophetiam Iudaeos in Babyloniam deductos fuisse, non obscura cognitio est. neque dubium est, per hunc eundem psalmorum librum potuisse captiuitatem populi prophetari. nam et in alio psalmo manifestum est absolute euersionem gentis huius atque urbis prophetatam fuisse, cum dicitur: deus, uenerunt gentes in hereditatem tuam, polluerunt templum sanctum tuum, posuerunt Hierusalem uelut pomorum custodiarium. et in hoc quoque praesenti psalmo idipsum significari uidetur, maxime cum quibusdam placuerit eum tamquam Hieremiae titulo inscribi, quia ab ipso sit, antequam accidit, denuntiata captiuitas. certe cum Hebraeis senioribus secundum cognitionem, quam ab his adepti sumus, psalmus hic sine inscriptionis istius titulo est.
That the Jews, captured according to the prophecy of Jeremiah, were led away into Babylonia is no obscure knowledge. Nor is there doubt that the captivity of the people could be prophesied through this same book of Psalms. For in another psalm too it is plain that the overthrow of this nation and city was prophesied outright, when it is said: "O God, the nations have come into your inheritance; they have defiled your holy temple; they have made Jerusalem like a hut for guarding fruit." And in this present psalm too the same seems to be signified, especially since it has pleased some to inscribe it with the title of Jeremiah, because the captivity was announced by him before it happened. Certainly, among the Hebrew elders, according to the knowledge we have obtained from them, this psalm is without this title.
136.2CSEL 22:724–725
Non dubium autem est omnia, quae in patres aut per patres nostros gesta sunt, formam futuri in his, quae gesta sunt, prsetulisse. et idipsum ita esse, hic quoque psalmorum liber testis est. namque cum in septuagesimo et septimo psalmo omnia, quae in Aegypto atque in deserto et in ceteris deinceps locis gesta essent, recenserentur, ea ipsa parabolica esse ita demonstrata sunt: adtende, populus meus, in legem meam; inclinate aurem uestram in uerba oris mei. aperiam in parabolam os meum, loquar propositiones ab initio. per id enim, quod et parabolae et propositiones sunt, rerum futurarum effectibus conparantur. apostolus quoque docet ea ipsa, quae gesta sunt, in prsefigurationem gesta esse, dicens: quia lex umbram habet futurorum bonorum et: omnia in prseformationem acciderunt his: scripta sunt autem propter nos, in quos fines saeculorum deuenerunt. gesta igitur ipsa illa in exemplum et scripta in doctrinam sunt.
There is no doubt that everything that was done to or through our fathers displayed in the deeds a form of the future. And that this is so, this book of Psalms too is witness. For when in the seventy-seventh psalm everything that was done in Egypt, in the desert, and in the other places afterward was recounted, those very things were shown to be parables thus: "Attend, my people, to my law; incline your ear to the words of my mouth. I will open my mouth in a parable; I will utter propositions from the beginning." For through the fact that they are parables and propositions, they are compared to the effects of future things. The apostle too teaches that the very things done were done as a prefiguring, saying: "For the law has a shadow of the good things to come," and: "All these things happened to them as a prefiguring; and they were written for our sake, upon whom the ends of the ages have come." The deeds themselves, then, were done as an example and written for teaching.
136.3CSEL 22:725–726
Itaque et hanc corporalem populi captiuitatem referri in exemplum spiritalis captiuitatis oportet. captae enim mentes nostrae sunt corporum saeculique dominatu, captae a daemonibus sunt iure uitiorum, quae imperium in nos suum per diuersa ministeriorum genera exercent, dum nos ebrietas possidet, dum luxus subigit, dum auaritia deuincit, dum ambitio occupat, dum maliuolentia obtinet, dum ira usurpat, dum omnia in nobis regnant haec incentiua uitiorum. uenit enim dominus secundum prophetam captiuitatem auertere, cum dicitur: praedicare captiuis remissiones. uenit ligatos soluere, cum ait: hanc filiam Abrahae, quam ligauerat satanas decem et octo annis, nonne oportuit solui in die sabbati? uenit seruientes in libertatem reducere dicens: amen dico uobis, quoniam omnis, qui facit peccatum, seruus est peccati. seruus autem non manet in domo in aeternum, filius autem manet in aeternum. si ergo uos filius liberauerit, uere liberi eritis. capimur ergo et ligamur et seruimus, non tam corpore, quam et mente. et mihi in praesenti psalmo omnis uirtus et ratio uerborum non tam corporalem captiuitatem tractare, quam spiritalem uidetur. ea enim et in querellis et in locis et in rebus et in nominibus momenta sunt, ut spiritalem potius captiuitatem haec lamentabilis prophetae querella significet
So this bodily captivity of the people too must be referred to as an example of spiritual captivity. For our minds are captured by the rule of bodies and of the world; they are captured by demons by the right of vices, which exercise their command over us through various kinds of service: when drunkenness possesses us, when luxury subdues, when avarice conquers, when ambition seizes, when malice holds, when anger usurps, when all these incitements of vices reign in us. For the Lord came, according to the prophet, to turn back captivity, when it is said: "to preach release to captives." He came to loose the bound, when he says: "This daughter of Abraham, whom Satan had bound for eighteen years, ought she not to be loosed on the sabbath day?" He came to lead back those in servitude into freedom, saying: "Amen I say to you, everyone who commits sin is the servant of sin. The servant does not remain in the house for ever, but the son remains for ever. If, then, the Son sets you free, you will be truly free." We are captured, then, and bound, and serve, not so much in body as in mind. And to me the whole force and reasoning of the words in the present psalm seems to treat not so much bodily captivity as spiritual. For there are such points in the laments, places, things, and names that this lamentable complaint of the prophet signifies rather a spiritual captivity.
136.4CSEL 22:726
Super flumina Babylonis illic sedimus et fleuimus, dum recordaremur Sion. in salicibus in medio eius suspendimus organa nostra. affectus humani sensus iste est, ut inter iniurias praesentium calamitatum ad praeteritorum bonorum recordationem ingemescat. contemplemur enim animo captam Hierusalem, seruientes dominis uictoribus reges, subditos antistitibus gentilium impietatum sacerdotes, ereptum omnibus ius matrimonii, substratum libidini Babyloniorum captae uirginitatis pudorem, et ex gemitu eorum, qui perpessuri ista erant, proclamasse digne prophetam existimabimus: super flumina Babylonis illic sedimus et fleuimus, dum recordaremur Sion.
"By the rivers of Babylon, there we sat and wept, when we remembered Zion. On the willows in its midst we hung up our instruments." This is the feeling of human sense: amid the injuries of present calamities to groan at the remembrance of past goods. Let us picture in our mind Jerusalem captured, kings serving their conquering masters, priests subjected to the high priests of Gentile impieties, the right of marriage snatched from all, the modesty of captive virginity laid beneath the lust of the Babylonians; and from the groaning of those who were to suffer these things we shall judge that the prophet rightly cried out: "By the rivers of Babylon, there we sat and wept, when we remembered Zion."
136.5CSEL 22:726–727
Sed quia Sion illa aeternae beatitudinis sedis est, et mater caelestis nobis Hierusalem est, frequentium angelorum et primitiuorum in caelis conscriptorum ciuitas sancta, et illa Babylon ciuitas confusionis et inrationabili motu turbulenta, quae, ut Genesis docet, a confusarum linguarum hominibus nuncupata Babylon est — illic enim loqui uniuersarum gentium linguis, cum unus omnium esset sermo, coeperunt, et ipsum illud Babylonis uocabulum interpretationem habet confusionis — quisquis ergo in crimine primi parentis Adae exulem se factum illius Sion recordabitur, in qua sine cupiditate, sine dolore, sine metu, sine crimine uita est, et traditum se saeculo confusionis huius tamquam Babyloni, traditum corpori, quod uitiorum et adpetitionum et cupiditatum perturbatione confusum est, recte et ipse spiritaliter captiuus proclamabit: super flumina Babylonis illic sedimus et fleuimus, cum recordaremur Sion. in salicibus in medio eius suspendimus organa nostra.
But since that Zion is the seat of eternal blessedness, and the heavenly Jerusalem is our mother, the holy city of thronging angels and of the firstborn enrolled in heaven; and since that Babylon is the city of confusion, turbulent with irrational motion, which, as Genesis teaches, was called Babylon from the men whose languages were confused (for there they began to speak in the languages of all nations, when all had one speech, and the very word Babylon means confusion): whoever, then, remembers that through the crime of the first parent Adam he has been made an exile from that Zion, in which life is without desire, without pain, without fear, without crime, and that he has been handed over to the world of this confusion as to Babylon, handed over to a body confused by the disturbance of vices, appetites, and desires, will himself too rightly cry out as a spiritual captive: "By the rivers of Babylon, there we sat and wept, when we remembered Zion. On the willows in its midst we hung up our instruments."
136.6CSEL 22:727
Eos, qui secundum litteram intellegenda omnia existimant, interrogare uellem, quae flumina Babyloniam prsetermeant, ut illic captus populus consederit et non potius aut in plateis aut in portis aut in turribus aut in domibus captiuitatem suam fleuerit? deinde cum quibus tympanis aut citharis aut organis captus sit, quae historia istud locuta sit, cum omni musico apparatu Israhelem uictoribus seruisse? postremo quae umquam salices in media urbe fronduerint, ut illic tamquam in publica musicorum apotheca organa suspensa penderent? quae si omnia gestis negotiorum corporalium inania sunt, sequenda ea ratio est, quae ex propheticis auctoritatibus ad spiritalem nos scientiam cohortatur. flent omnes, qui se captos in Babylonia sentiunt. et sedent super flumina. omnia enim saeculi et corporum opera modo fluminum sine aliqua cursus sui statione praeterfluunt; currunt namque et elabuntur et transeunt. quae enim corporalis uoluptas non praesentis iam nulla est? quod terrenum gaudium non cum ipso fugitiuo sensu praesentis fructus sui transit? super haec igitur saecularium captiuitatum flumina sedentes et flentes ad recordationem Sion amissorum desiderio et praesentium calamitate ingemescunt.
I should like to ask those who think everything is to be understood according to the letter what rivers flow past Babylonia, so that the captive people sat down there and did not rather weep for their captivity in the streets, the gates, the towers, or the houses. Then, with what drums, harps, or instruments were they captured? What history has said that Israel served its conquerors with a whole musical apparatus? Finally, what willows ever grew leafy in the middle of a city, so that instruments might hang there as in a public storehouse of musicians? If all these things are empty as an account of bodily affairs, we must follow the reasoning which, from prophetic authorities, urges us to spiritual knowledge. All weep who feel themselves captive in Babylonia. And they sit by the rivers. For all the works of the world and of bodies flow past like rivers, without any halt in their course; for they run, slip away, and pass. For what bodily pleasure is not already nothing once it is no longer present? What earthly joy does not pass with the very fleeting sense of its present enjoyment? Sitting and weeping, then, by these rivers of worldly captivities, they groan at the remembrance of Zion with longing for what is lost and with the calamity of the present.
136.7CSEL 22:727–728
Neque solum sedent atque flent, sed etiam in medio eius organa sua in salicibus suspendunt. lignorum salicum natura ea est, ut arefacta licet, si modo aquis adluantur, uirescant, deinde excisa atque in humido fixa radicibus sese ipsa demergant. et sub huius arboris natura sanctos et fideles significari prophetica auctoritas est Esaia dicente: exorientur, inquit, tamquam in medio aquae faenum et tamquam salix super defluentem aquam. oritur enim ex mortuo, quisquis antea peccatis aridus et ab anterioris uitae radice decisus nunc eloquio dei et sacramento baptismi aquis uitalibus reuiuescit. sed et cum festiuitas scenopegiorum Iudaeis corporaliter traderetur, quod tabernaculum frondeum cum ad futurae laetitiae et tabernaculi exemplum ex electarum arborum ramis pararetur, etiam ex ramis fluuialis salicis effici iussum est, quia ex conuentu sanctorum uirorum caelestis tabernaculi futura esset laetitia perfecta. organa autem scriptura humana corpora, quorum honestis motibus et concinentibus operationibus, quae deo placita sunt, psallimus, esse significat in media igitur harum saecularium confusionum captiuitate hi, qui amissam Sion recordantur, qui in Adam extorres se factos esse caelestis Hierusalem meminerunt, qui et captos se esse in Babylonia sentiunt, hi sedentes et flentes corpora sua in formam sanctorum uirorum habitumque suspendunt ab terrenis se desideriis erigentes.
And they not only sit and weep, but also hang up their instruments on the willows in its midst. The nature of willow wood is such that, even when dried out, if only it is washed by water it grows green again, and when cut and set in moist ground it sinks itself down by its roots. And that the holy and faithful are signified under the nature of this tree is prophetic authority, as Isaiah says: "They shall spring up," he says, "like grass in the midst of water and like the willow by running water." For he springs up from the dead who, formerly dry with sins and cut off from the root of his former life, now comes to life again by the word of God and the sacrament of baptism in the life-giving waters. Moreover, when the feast of Tabernacles was given bodily to the Jews, since a leafy tabernacle was prepared from the branches of chosen trees as a pattern of future joy and of the tabernacle, it was commanded to be made also from the branches of the river willow, because the joy of the heavenly tabernacle would be perfected from the assembly of holy men. Scripture signifies that the instruments are human bodies, with whose honorable motions and harmonious workings, pleasing to God, we sing psalms. In the midst, then, of the captivity of these worldly confusions, those who remember the lost Zion, who remember that in Adam they were made exiles from the heavenly Jerusalem, and who feel themselves captive in Babylonia, these, sitting and weeping, hang up their bodies on the form and habit of holy men, lifting themselves up from earthly desires.
136.8CSEL 22:728–729
Sed licet per continentiae studium in salices illas suspensa nostra sint corpora, tamen ea, quae captiuos nos efficiunt, non quiescunt. sequitur enim: quia illic interrogauerunt nos, qui captiuos duxerunt nos, uerba cantionum: et qui abduxerunt nos: hymnum cantate nobis de canticis Sion. si quis humanae naturae consuetudinem recolit, sensum omnem absolutum habebit, namque qui laborant a uitiis desinere et eorum, quae impie gesserint, obliuisci uolunt. incentiuo tamen consuetudinis aegre desinentis agitantur; et ea, quae occulta sunt uitia in nobis, admiscere se fidei sacramentis et inserere pertemptant, ut inter diuinos hymnos et sacras lectiones harum inimicarum captiuantium nos cupiditatum cogitatio subrepat. nec sane deest hoc absolutum in plurimis exemplum. multos enim, quos uidemus legere atque disserere. hos rursum accidit deuersatos esse semper in stupris et in impietatibus deprehendi. sanctus uero quisque est, qui organum suum in salice suspenderit, istis, qui se captiuos duxerant, consortium Sion cantici negat neque inimicis sibi uirtutibus sanctarum cantionum uerba communicat.
But although through the pursuit of continence our bodies are hung on those willows, yet the things that make us captive do not rest. For there follows: "For there those who led us captive asked us for words of songs, and those who carried us off: Sing us a hymn from the songs of Zion." If anyone recalls the habit of human nature, he will have the whole sense plain. For those who labor to cease from vices and wish to forget what they have impiously done are nonetheless driven by the incitement of a habit slow to cease; and the vices hidden in us try to mingle and insert themselves into the mysteries of faith, so that amid the divine hymns and sacred readings the thought of these hostile desires that make us captive creeps in. Nor indeed is a plain example of this lacking in very many. For many whom we see reading and discoursing, it happens again that they are caught having always lived in acts of sexual immorality and impieties. But every holy man who has hung his instrument on the willow denies to those who led him captive a share in the song of Zion, and does not share the words of holy songs with the powers hostile to him.
136.9CSEL 22:729
Quae autem sint, quse captiuos ducant, nos apostolus docet dicens: uideo aliam legem in membris meis militantem aduersus legem mentis mese et captiuum me ducentem in lege peccati, quae est in membris meis. cum igitur inter concupiscentiam carnis et spiritus pugna est, tum ea, quse captiuos nos conantur sibi subdere, pertemptant occupare corpus eiusque dominari seseque doctrinis spiritalibus, ut per consuetudinem his auctoritatem adimant, inserere. sed resistendum est et prophetae uoce respondendum: quomodo cantabimus canticum domini in terra aliena? terra nostra retinenda est et in libertatem tuenda. polluta enim terrae corpora audire de Sion canticis nihil possunt, et aliena a deo, licet nostra sint, erunt, si a lege peccati coeperint esse captiua.
What it is that leads us captive the apostle teaches us, saying: "I see another law in my members, warring against the law of my mind and leading me captive in the law of sin which is in my members." When, then, there is a fight between the desire of the flesh and of the spirit, then the things that try to subject us captive to themselves attempt to seize the body and rule it, and to insert themselves into spiritual teachings, so as to take away their authority through habit. But we must resist and answer with the prophet's voice: "How shall we sing the Lord's song in a strange land?" Our land must be held and protected in freedom. For bodies of polluted earth can hear nothing of the songs of Zion, and they will be strange to God, though they are ours, if they begin to be captive to the law of sin.
136.10CSEL 22:729–730
Sed memoria semper caelestis illius Hierusalem et sanctae Sion continenda est, uel dum redhiberi optatur, uel dum fletur amissa. id enim sequitur: si oblitus fuero tui, Hierusalem, obliuiscatur me dextera mea. adhsereat lingua mea gutturi meo, si non meminero tui, si non praeposuero Hierusalem in principio laetitiae meae. cum obliuionis poena recordationis memoria spondetur. sed id, quod ait: obliuiscatur dextera mea, obscurum est per condicionem latinitatis. nam secundum grsecitatis proprietatem, qua ita dictum est: ἐπιλησθείη ἡ δεξία μου, non ut ipsa obliuiscatur, sed ne obliuio eius fiat, ostenditur. et magni periculi res est, si dexterae nostrae fiat obliuio. omnes enim, qui spei bonae pleni sunt, dexterae deputantur, peccatoribus in sinistra collocandis. condicionem ergo obliuiscendae dexterae suae, quam sibi fide et expectatione prsesumit, sub poena non recordatse Hierusalem ipse proposuit, ut a memoria dextera suae, id est qua in dextera locaretur, si ipse memoriam Hierusalem non retinuisset, excideret.
But the memory of that heavenly Jerusalem and holy Zion must always be kept, whether while we wish it restored or while we weep for it lost. For there follows: "If I forget you, Jerusalem, let my right hand be forgotten. Let my tongue cleave to my throat if I do not remember you, if I do not set Jerusalem at the beginning of my joy." With the penalty of forgetting, the memory of remembrance is pledged. But the saying "let my right hand forget" is obscure through the condition of the Latin. For according to the proper sense of the Greek, in which it is said thus, ἐπιλησθείη ἡ δεξιά μου, it is shown not that it should itself forget, but that it should be forgotten. And it is a matter of great danger if our right hand is forgotten. For all who are full of good hope are assigned to the right, sinners to be placed on the left. He himself, then, set the condition of his right hand being forgotten, which he anticipates for himself by faith and expectation, under the penalty of not remembering Jerusalem: so that he would fall from the memory of his right hand, that is, the hand by which he would be placed on the right, if he had not kept the memory of Jerusalem.
136.11CSEL 22:730–731
Addit et aliam poenam obliuionis dicens: adhaereat lingua mea gutturi meo, si non meminero tui. scit infelix os dei laudibus mutum. scit beatas illas aeternasque uirtutes throno dei adsistentes continuata uoce in dei laudibus permanere dicentes: sanctus, sanctus, sanctus dominus deus Sabaoth, pleni sunt caeli et terrae gloriae tuae. scit et de his, qui mortuorum modo taciti in dei laudibus uiuerent, dictum esse: sepulcrum patens est guttur eorum, quia in gutture eorum, tamquam in sepulcro patente, in laudes dei emortua uox sileret. huic igitur sese silentii poense sub obliuionis condicione subiecit, si memor Hierusalem non fuisset, sed etiam per id, quod sequitur: si non praeposuero Hierusalem in principio iucunditatis meae. unicuique nostrum secundum uoluntatis suae sententiam laetitiae causa subiecta est et ex affectu animi sui initium gaudii sumit, ut potator ex ebrietate, ut gulo ex cibis, ut auarus ex pecunia, ut ambitiosus ex honoribus, ut seditiosus ex turbis, ut libidinosus ex stupris. haec ergo unicuique, prout his delectatur, laetitiae adferunt causam. sed propheta Hierusalem sibi initium laetitiae praeponit, hinc exordium gaudii sumens, quod in Hierusalem receptus immortalis ex mortali erit, quod angelorum frequentium coetu admiscebitur, quod in regno domini recipietur, quod conformis gloriae ipsius fiet. nescit ergo alia gaudia neque aliud habet, unde laetetur, solam sibi Hierusalem gaudii initium praeponens.
He adds another penalty of forgetting, saying: "Let my tongue cleave to my throat if I do not remember you." He knows that a mouth mute in God's praises is unhappy. He knows that those blessed and eternal powers standing at the throne of God continue in God's praises with unceasing voice, saying: "Holy, holy, holy, Lord God of hosts; heaven and earth are full of your glory." He knows too that of those who lived silent like the dead in God's praises it was said: "Their throat is an open tomb," because in their throat, as in an open tomb, the voice lay dead and silent in God's praises. To this penalty of silence, then, he subjected himself under the condition of forgetting, if he had not remembered Jerusalem, and also by what follows: "if I do not set Jerusalem at the beginning of my gladness." For each of us the cause of joy lies according to the judgment of his will, and he takes the beginning of gladness from the disposition of his mind: the drinker from drunkenness, the glutton from food, the miser from money, the ambitious from honors, the seditious from riots, the lustful from acts of sexual immorality. These things, then, bring each the cause of joy as he delights in them. But the prophet sets Jerusalem before himself as the beginning of joy, taking the start of gladness from this: that, received into Jerusalem, he will be immortal from mortal, that he will be mingled with the company of thronging angels, that he will be received into the kingdom of the Lord, that he will be made conformable to his glory. He knows no other joys, then, nor has anything else to rejoice in, setting Jerusalem alone before himself as the beginning of joy.
136.12CSEL 22:731–733
Et quia meminit per multas sibi corporis infirmitates, per multas spiritus angustias, per multa subrepentium uitiorum incentiua eo esse ueniendum, ueretur, ne quid sibi per naturam corporis ex uitiis adhaerescat. post hoc enim ad deum precatur dicens: memento, domine, filiorum Edom in diem Hierusalem, qui dicunt: exinanite, exinanite quoad usque fundamentum in ea. Edom interpretatur terrenum: uitia itaque terreni corporis nostri, quae, quia ex natura corporis exeunt, Edom filii nuncupantur, his Babyloniis, id est confusionibus et perturbationibus sensus nostri imperant, ut nos ex ea plenitudine, qua repleti sumus, euacuent. scriptum est enim: quoniam de plenitudine eius omnes accepimus. quisque enim capax est domini, ipse et de plenitudine eius inpletus est. est autem haec natura turbidi confusique per uitia corporis sensus, ut, si semel nos in omnem peccati uoluntatem et consuetudinem traxerit, omnibus nos bonarum uirtutum studiis exinaniat haec ergo uitia his sensus nostri turbidis confusionibus imperant, uti nos fundamento ipso exinaniant. quisque enim sanctus est, pro parte Hierusalem ipse est; quia ex conuentu beatorum uirorum et caelesti consortio dignorum Hierusalem uiuorum et pretiosorum lapidum ciuitas erit, quam haec terrena uitia usque ad fundamentum exinanire nituntur. et quod fundamentum in nobis sit, apostolus docet dicens: fundamentum autem aliud nemo potest ponere praeter illud, quod est Christus. omne igitur religionis initium, omne fundamentum spei nostrae euacuare temptant, ne qua in nobis memoria et recordatio dei resideat, ne qua spes boni alicuius relinquatur. fundamento enim fidei, quod est Christus, eruto et euerso ne ipsius quidem aedificandae nobis per psenitentiam ueniae consolatio relinquetur.
And since he remembers that he must come there through many weaknesses of the body, many straits of the spirit, many incitements of creeping vices, he fears lest something from the vices should cling to him through the nature of the body. For after this he prays to God, saying: "Remember, O Lord, the sons of Edom in the day of Jerusalem, who say: Empty it, empty it, even to its foundation." Edom means "earthly": so the vices of our earthly body, which, because they come out of the nature of the body, are called sons of Edom, command these Babylonians, that is, the confusions and disturbances of our sense, to empty us of the fullness with which we have been filled. For it is written: "For of his fullness we have all received." For whoever is capable of the Lord is himself also filled with his fullness. And this is the nature of the sense, made turbid and confused through the vices of the body, that once it has dragged us into every will and habit of sin, it empties us of all the pursuits of good virtues. These vices, then, command these turbid confusions of our sense to empty us even to the foundation. For every holy man is himself in part Jerusalem; because from the assembly of blessed men worthy of heavenly fellowship Jerusalem will be the city of living and precious stones, which these earthly vices strive to empty even to the foundation. And what the foundation in us is, the apostle teaches, saying: "For no one can lay another foundation than that which is laid, which is Christ." They try, then, to empty out every beginning of religion, every foundation of our hope, so that no memory or remembrance of God may remain in us, no hope of any good be left. For once the foundation of faith, which is Christ, is torn out and overthrown, not even the comfort of pardon to be built up for us through repentance will be left.
136.13CSEL 22:733–734
Commemorata autem Hierusalem captiuitate et filiorum Edom in exinaniendis nobis usque ad fundamentum adhortatione consequens est, ut, quatenus aduersus haec nobis prouidendum sit, propheta demonstret. et demonstrat plane. non inopes nos neque inperitos relinquens, cum ait: filia Babylonis misera: beatus, qui retribuet tibi retributionem tuam, quam retribuisti nobis. beatus, qui tenebit et allidet paruulos tuos ad petram. uellem percontari eos, qui otiosas esse spiritales psalmorum intellegentias existimant, quam hic a propheta Babylonis filiam dictam esse intellegant, et, cum superius super Babylonis flumina sessum atque ploratum sit, cur nunc Babylonis filia misera sit? sed quia sensus legentis corporali intellegentia caret, spiritalis ratio tractanda est. ad infelicem enim illam confusionis et perturbationis nostrae carnem sermo omnis reuertitur, quae secundum historiae fidem ex confusionis patribus genita est, quia omnis caro superioris carnis est filia. ex his enim, qui primum confusis linguis confusionis urbem, quae Babylonia est, condiderunt, uniuersarum gentium initia dispersa sunt. haec ergo misera Babylonia est filia, id est caro omnium. cui qui retribuet retributiones suas, beatus est, scilicet qui carnem suam dominatui animae subiecerit, et quisque eam spiritui subdiderit. illa enim omnes eos, qui inperiti de deo et ignari erant, omnibus uoluptatibus et desideriis suis subegerat et captiuae menti dominans imperabat. sed cum per cognitionem dei uitia eius, non dico abolitione, sed morte perimuntur, cum religio, pudicitia, largitio, sobrietas et caritas impietatem, libidinem, auaritiam, ebrietatem, simultatem, odia consumpsit et omnibus operibus spiritus caro uicta famulatur, tunc beatus est, qui retributionem suam ei retribuet, id est qui dominatum in eam spiritus, quo uti ipsa in spiritum erat solita, demutat.
Having recalled the captivity of Jerusalem and the urging of the sons of Edom to empty us even to the foundation, it follows that the prophet should show how far we must provide against these things. And he plainly shows it, not leaving us helpless or unskilled, when he says: "Wretched daughter of Babylon, blessed is he who will repay you the repayment you repaid us. Blessed is he who will take and dash your little ones against the rock." I should like to ask those who think the spiritual understandings of the psalms idle whom they understand the prophet here to call the daughter of Babylon, and, since above the sitting and weeping were by the rivers of Babylon, why the daughter of Babylon is now wretched. But since the sense of the reader finds no bodily understanding, the spiritual reasoning must be treated. The whole speech returns to that unhappy flesh of our confusion and disturbance, which, according to the faithfulness of history, was begotten from the fathers of confusion, because all flesh is the daughter of earlier flesh. For from those who first, when the languages were confused, founded the city of confusion, which is Babylonia, the beginnings of all nations were scattered. This, then, is the wretched daughter of Babylonia, that is, the flesh of all. Blessed is he who will repay her her repayments, namely, he who subjects his flesh to the rule of the soul, and whoever subdues it to the spirit. For she had subdued to all her pleasures and desires all who were unskilled and ignorant about God, and commanded, ruling the captive mind. But when through the knowledge of God her vices are destroyed, I do not say by abolition but by death, when religion, chastity, generosity, sobriety, and love consume impiety, lust, avarice, drunkenness, rivalry, and hatreds, and the flesh, conquered, serves all the works of the spirit, then blessed is he who will repay her repayment, that is, who reverses the rule which she used to exercise over the spirit into the spirit's rule over her.
136.14CSEL 22:734
Neque solum retributor retributionis beatus, sed etiam ille beatus, qui tenebit et allidet paruulos tuos ad petram. uitia corporis non sunt sinenda coalescere, sed in exordiis statim enecanda sunt. periculosae enim sunt iam robustae cupiditates, et difficulter adulta quaeque perimuntur. leuius autem est prorumpentes auellere, teneras excidere, flexibiles retorquere. beatus itaque est, quisquis in exordio inhonestas quasque omnium cupiditatum adpetitiones, quae ex uoluntate carnis oriuntur, primum intra ius patientiae suae uirtutisque cohibebit, deinde eas ad fidem atque ad metum dei elisas enecabit. omnis enim, qui ex peccatis ad religionem transferetur, peccata omnia in eam, ad quam decedet, religionem elisa comminuet. in eo autem, quod paruulos miserae filiae Babylonis tenet et allidit, et uirtus, qua nascentes cohibet, et fides, qua, ne adolescant, allidit, ostenditur. et allidit ad petram: petra autem secundum apostolum Christus est. in quem beatus est, qui filiae Babylonis paruulos, id est tenera adhuc corporis uitia allidet et conteret. ipsi unigenito deo ac domino nostro gloria et laus in saecula saeculorum. amen.
And not only is the repayer of the repayment blessed, but he too is blessed "who will take and dash your little ones against the rock." The vices of the body must not be allowed to grow strong, but must be killed at once in their beginnings. For desires already grown strong are dangerous, and whatever is full-grown is killed with difficulty. It is easier to pluck them out as they break forth, to cut them while tender, to twist them back while pliant. Blessed, then, is whoever at the beginning first holds within the control of his patience and virtue all the shameful appetites of every desire that arise from the will of the flesh, and then, dashing them against faith and the fear of God, kills them. For everyone who passes from sins to religion will dash and crush all his sins against the religion to which he goes over. In that he takes and dashes the little ones of the wretched daughter of Babylon, both the virtue by which he restrains them as they are born and the faith by which he dashes them, so that they may not grow up, is shown. And he dashes them against the rock: and the rock, according to the apostle, is Christ. Against him blessed is he who will dash and crush the little ones of the daughter of Babylon, that is, the still tender vices of the body. To him, the only-begotten God and our Lord, be glory and praise for ever and ever. Amen.
Tractates 137
137.1CSEL 22:734–735
Duplicem in confessione significationem esse, in plurimis locis demonstrauimus: aut peccati nostri, aut laudationis dei. et hoc ita esse, ex euangelicis dictis promptum est noscere. nam cum ait dominus: confiteor tibi, pater, domine caeli et terrae, quia abscondisti haec a sapientibus et prudentibus saeculi et reuelasti ea paruulis, laudem dei patris ob reuelata paruulis, quae ignorata essent prudentibus, confitetur, docens ideo absconsa ea esse his, qui prudentes uiderentur, quia non secundum innocentiam paruulorum praeceptis euangelicis credidissent. at uero, ubi in isdem euangeliis dicitur: et baptizabantur omnes in Iordane confitentes peccata sua, illic confessio peccatorum sine ambiguitate significationis alterius continetur.
We have shown in very many places that there is a double meaning in confession: either of our sin or of the praise of God. And that this is so is easy to learn from the sayings of the Gospels. For when the Lord says, "I confess to you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, that you have hidden these things from the wise and prudent of the world and revealed them to little ones," he confesses the praise of God the Father for revealing to little ones what was unknown to the prudent, teaching that these things were hidden from those who seemed prudent because they had not believed the Gospel commandments with the innocence of little ones. But where in the same Gospels it is said, "And all were baptized in the Jordan, confessing their sins," there confession of sins is contained without ambiguity of another meaning.
137.2CSEL 22:735
Maxima autem et utilissima est letalium uitiorum morbis in eorum confessione medicina. sed confessio peccati non est tamquam rerum aliis ignoratarum professio, ut si fur de furto, aut homicida de caede interrogatus confitetur; neque tamquam ignorans, qui scrutans corda et renes deus est, ad scientiam sui confessione tua indiget, cui promptum est non cogitata, sed cogitanda perspicere. confessio autem peccati ea est, ut id, quod a te gestum est, per cognitionem peccati confitearis esse peccatum. nemo enim, quod agit, ad id agendum non aut ex fructu oblectationis alicuius aut iudicio bonae in eo opinionis adgreditur, dum aut rectum id putat aut eo gaudet. sed cum per doctrinam dei uerique rationem ea, quae sub specie aut utilitatis aut uoluptatis egit, intellegit esse peccatum, per peccati intellegentiam peccatum id esse, quod a se gestum est, confitetur.
The greatest and most useful medicine for the diseases of deadly vices lies in confessing them. But confession of sin is not like the declaration of things unknown to others, as when a thief questioned about a theft, or a murderer about a killing, confesses; nor does God, who searches hearts and reins, need your confession for his knowledge as if he were ignorant, for whom it is easy to see not only what has been thought but what is going to be thought. Confession of sin is this: that you confess what you have done to be sin, through knowledge of sin. For no one undertakes what he does except either for the fruit of some delight or from the judgment of a good opinion of it, while he either thinks it right or rejoices in it. But when through the teaching of God and the reasoning of truth he understands that what he did under the appearance of usefulness or pleasure is sin, through the understanding of sin he confesses that what he has done is sin.
137.3CSEL 22:735–736
Nullus autem, quod peccatum esse confessus est, deinceps cum uenia admittet, quia peccati confessio professio est desinendi. ceterum in intellectis et confessis manere, haec peccati iam pridem scientia ueniam confessionis amittit. confiteri enim id tamquam recens cognitum non potest, quod a se cum peccati cognitione sit gestum. desinendum ergo a peccatis est, postquam in confessione est cognitio peccati; et confitendum est, ut propheta docuit, corde toto, non ex parte, neque aliqua adhuc nobiscum cognitorum peccatorum operatione residente. quid enim, si quis de furto paenitens iniquis et turpibus lucris pecuniam suam auxerit? non erit quidem fur, sed erit auarus et raptor. aut si quis ex fornicatione desinens uino se nimio corrumpet? corpus quidem suum non polluet, sed animam contaminabit. et si quis a caedibus temperans maledicus esse persistet? manum quidem homicidam non habebit, sed linguam habebit. et quomodo quis ex toto corde poterit confiteri non exigua secum peccati parte residente? detersis itaque omnibus uitiis confessione opus est desinendi et orandum semper ad deum est, ut in cohibendis peccatis extinguendisque incentiuis eorum pendula uoluntatis nostrae studia confirmet.
No one will afterward commit with pardon what he has confessed to be sin, because confession of sin is a declaration of ceasing. But to remain in sins understood and confessed: this long-standing knowledge of sin loses the pardon of confession. For one cannot confess as newly known what one has done with knowledge of sin. One must cease from sins, then, once the knowledge of sin is in confession; and one must confess, as the prophet taught, with the whole heart, not in part, nor with any working of known sins still remaining with us. For what if someone, repenting of theft, increases his money by unjust and shameful gains? He will not indeed be a thief, but he will be greedy and a robber. Or if someone, ceasing from sexual immorality, corrupts himself with too much wine? He will not indeed pollute his body, but he will defile his soul. And if someone, refraining from killing, persists in cursing? He will not indeed have a murderous hand, but he will have a murderous tongue. And how will anyone be able to confess with his whole heart if no small part of sin remains with him? All vices being wiped away, then, the work of ceasing is needed in confession, and we must always pray to God that he may strengthen the wavering efforts of our will in restraining sins and extinguishing their incitements.
137.4CSEL 22:736
Ob quod iam confidens propheta per confessionem ac precem suam in portu se innocentiae conlocatum ait: confitebor tibi, domine, in toto corde meo: quoniam audisti uerba oris mei. duplex intellegentiae huius, ut superius iam diximus, sensus est. nam siue laudem deo confitetur, quia uerba oris eius audita sunt, siue per misericordiam dei, cum diu orasset, adiutus iam omnibus peccatis desinentibus confitetur. fidei nostrae utrumque conueniens, ut et dominum laudemus et confiteamur intellecta peccata.
Therefore, now confident through his confession and prayer, the prophet says he has been placed in the harbor of innocence: "I will confess to you, O Lord, with my whole heart, for you have heard the words of my mouth." There is a double sense to this understanding, as we said above. For either he confesses praise to God because the words of his mouth were heard, or, helped by God's mercy after praying long, he confesses now that all his sins have ceased. Both suit our faith: that we both praise the Lord and confess the sins we have understood.
137.5CSEL 22:736–737
Dehinc sequitur: et in conspectu angelorum psallam tibi. parum sibi existimat propheta esse, ut hominibus tantum praesentibus psallat, quia homines corporalium tantum negotiorum officia inspiciant. in eo enim, quod psallit, motum conplacitae deo operationis ostendit. non ergo ea, quae uidentur in corpore, cerni desiderat, sed ea, quae spiritaliter naturae spiritales contuentur, gerere festinat. scit enim se sub specula angelorum uitam omnem moresque agere, et ubique haec diuinorum ministeriorum auxilia fidelibus cunctis adsistere, ut scriptum est: angelus domini in circuitu timentium eum. legem etiam Moysi in manu mediatoris per angelos fuisse dispositam, apostolus docet. nec non et Heliseus absolutissime docuit humanas infirmitates angelorum auxiliis defendi et in omnibus periculis, si fides maneat in nobis, adesse spiritalium uirtutum defensionem. namque cum rex Syriae capere Geth urbem, in qua idem Heliseus propheta esset, pararet et nocturnis itineribus exercitum suum, qui antelucanus urbem obsideret, destinasset, puer Helisei conspecta obsidione dixit: o domine, quid faciemus? et dixit Heliseus: noli timere: quia plures sunt nobiscum quam cum illis. et orauit Heliseus ad dominum et dixit: adaperi oculos, domine, pueri huius, et uideat. et adaperuit dominus oculos pueri, et uidit; et ecce mons erat plenus equis et curribus in gyro Helisei, et descenderunt ad eos. tantus et tam nobilis propheta solus contemplatione auxiliorum spiritalium dignus est; sed oratio eius ad deum uisum incorporalium etiam puero suo meruit. in horum igitur adsistentium humanis auxiliis angelorum conspectu psallit propheta spiritalibus spiritalium operum contemplatione placiturus.
Then follows: "And in the sight of the angels I will sing psalms to you." The prophet thinks it too little to sing psalms only in the presence of men, because men see only the performance of bodily affairs. In that he sings psalms, he shows the motion of a work pleasing to God. He does not desire, then, that what is seen in the body be observed, but hastens to do what spiritual natures behold spiritually. For he knows that he leads his whole life and conduct under the watch of the angels, and that these aids of divine ministers stand by all the faithful everywhere, as it is written: "The angel of the Lord encamps around those who fear him." The apostle teaches too that the law of Moses was ordained through angels in the hand of a mediator. And Elisha also taught most plainly that human weaknesses are defended by the help of angels, and that in all dangers, if faith remains in us, the defense of spiritual powers is present. For when the king of Syria was preparing to capture the city of Geth, in which this same prophet Elisha was, and had sent his army by night marches to besiege the city before dawn, Elisha's servant, seeing the siege, said: "O lord, what shall we do?" And Elisha said: "Do not fear, for there are more with us than with them." And Elisha prayed to the Lord and said: "Open, O Lord, the eyes of this servant, and let him see." And the Lord opened the eyes of the servant, and he saw; and behold, the mountain was full of horses and chariots around Elisha, and they came down to them. So great and noble a prophet alone was worthy of the contemplation of spiritual aid; but his prayer to God won the sight of incorporeal things for his servant too. In the sight of these angels, then, who stand by to help men, the prophet sings psalms, intending to please spiritual beings by the contemplation of spiritual works.
137.6CSEL 22:737–738
Sed non solum coram angelis psallit, sed etiam id, quod sequitur, efficiet. adorabo ad templum sanctum tuum: non in templo, ne quid secundum consuetudinem Iudaeorum corporaliter loqui uideretur, si adoraret in templo; sed ad templum, id est apud templum spiritu et corpore adoraturus. templum autem deo esse sanctum quemque apostolus docet dicens: uos estis templum dei, et spiritus dei habitat in uobis. habitatio ergo, quae ex nobis deo digna erit, deo templum est.
But he not only sings psalms before the angels; he will also do what follows: "I will worship toward your holy temple": not in the temple, lest he seem to speak bodily according to the custom of the Jews if he worshipped in the temple, but toward the temple, that is, intending to worship at the temple in spirit and body. And that every holy person is a temple for God the apostle teaches, saying: "You are the temple of God, and the Spirit of God dwells in you." The dwelling, then, that will be made from us worthy of God is a temple for God.
137.7CSEL 22:738–739
Apud hoc ergo templum deo sanctum adorabit, non sine perfecta ratione doctrinae, ne qua hsereticis de incompositse orationis confusione ad studia sua pateret inreligiositatis occasio. ait enim: et confitebor nomini tuo super misericordiam tuam et ueritatem tuam. cum dei nomini confitetur, tenet euangeliorum et legis congruam fidem. quod enim sibi nomen esset, sciri deus uoluit: eodem dicto euangelico et legis dominus Sadducseis resurrectionem corporum abnegantibus respondens ostendit: de resurrectione autem mortuorum non legistis, quod dictum est uobis a deo dicente: ego sum deus Abraham et deus Isaac et deus Iacob? non est deus mortuorum, sed uiuentium. in absoluto ergo haereticorum error est, qui alium atque alium euangeliorum et legis deum asserunt, cum dominus id, quod principale in lege est, ad confirmationem spei euangelicae commemoret. est autem et nomen aliud deo, quod in euangeliis cognoscimus domino dicente: pater, uenit hora, honorifica filium tuum, ut filius honorificet te. et post multa alia sequitur: manifestaui nomen tuum hominibus. et quod nomen esset, superius ostendit dicens: pater, uenit hora, honorifica filium tuum. huius ergo nomen adorat, qui et secundum legem deus Abraham et deus Isaac et deus Iacob sit, et secundum euangelia unigeniti dei pater est.
At this temple holy to God, then, he will worship, not without the perfect reasoning of doctrine, lest any occasion of irreligion should open to heretics for their pursuits from the confusion of an ill-composed prayer. For he says: "And I will confess to your name for your mercy and your truth." When he confesses to God's name, he holds the faith in which the Gospels and the law agree. For God willed it to be known what his name was: the Lord showed it by the same saying of the Gospel and the law, answering the Sadducees who denied the resurrection of bodies: "But concerning the resurrection of the dead, have you not read what was said to you by God, saying: I am the God of Abraham and the God of Isaac and the God of Jacob? He is not the God of the dead but of the living." The error of the heretics, then, is plain, who assert one God of the Gospels and another of the law, since the Lord recalls what is principal in the law to confirm the hope of the Gospel. But there is also another name for God, which we learn in the Gospels when the Lord says: "Father, the hour has come; glorify your Son, that the Son may glorify you." And after much else there follows: "I have manifested your name to men." And what the name was he showed above, saying: "Father, the hour has come; glorify your Son." He worships, then, the name of him who is both, according to the law, the God of Abraham and the God of Isaac and the God of Jacob, and, according to the Gospels, the Father of the only-begotten God.
137.8CSEL 22:739
Extinguit quoque insolentem eorum professionem, qui humanse naturae et infirmitatis inmemores et inmisericordem deum praedicantes peccatis psenitentium ueniam et solacium non relinquunt: cum ad paenitentiam, per quam a peccatis desistitur, doctrina legis, prophetarum, euangeliorum, apostolorum eos, qui peccauerint, adhortetur, ut desperatae iam spei aliquantulum per eam solacii conparetur, ut amissis licet beatis et maximis et deo proximis ne his saltem, quae talibus sunt secunda, careamus.
He also extinguishes the insolent profession of those who, forgetful of human nature and weakness and preaching a merciless God, leave no pardon or comfort for the sins of the penitent: whereas the teaching of the law, the prophets, the Gospels, and the apostles urges those who have sinned to repentance, by which one desists from sins, so that through it some little comfort may be gained for a hope already despaired of, so that, even if we have lost the blessed, greatest things nearest to God, we may at least not lack those that are second to them.
137.9CSEL 22:739
Tollit etiam stultissimam eorum temeritatem, qui frustrato falsoque corpore dominum in carne uisum esse contendunt, ut eum pater ementita ueritate in habitu falsae carnis ostenderit, non recordantes post resurrectionem corporis spiritum se uidere credentibus apostolis dictum esse: quid conturbati estis, et quae cogitationes ascenderunt in corde uestro? uidete manus meas et pedes meos, quoniam ipse ego sum: palpate et uidete, quoniam spiritus carnem et ossa non habet, sicut me uidetis habentem. ab horum igitur confessione confessionem suam propheta discernit perfectae fidei ordinem tenens, cum in nomine deum Abrahse et deum Isaac et deum Iacob, cum in misericordia psenitentium misericordem, cum in ueritate uerbum, quod caro factum sit, confitetur.
He also removes the most foolish rashness of those who contend that the Lord was seen in the flesh with an unreal and false body, as though the Father had shown him with feigned truth in the appearance of false flesh, not remembering that after the resurrection of the body it was said to the apostles, who believed they were seeing a spirit: "Why are you troubled, and what thoughts have arisen in your heart? See my hands and my feet, that it is I myself; touch and see, for a spirit does not have flesh and bones, as you see that I have." The prophet distinguishes his confession from the confession of these, holding the order of perfect faith, when he confesses God in the name of the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob; merciful to the penitent in his mercy; and in his truth the Word who was made flesh.
137.10CSEL 22:739–740
Causa etiam confessionis hinc sumitur: quoniam magnificasti super omnia nomen sanctum tuum. non uni tantum genti dei nomen est cognitum: super omnia magnificatum est et in omnes se magnitudo sanctitatis extendit. non barbarus, non Scytha, non seruus, non liber, non mulier, non uir, non aetas ulla secernitur: super omnia enim magnificatum dei nomen est. templa conlapsa sunt, simulacra muta sunt, haruspices interuentu sanctorum silent, augurium fides fallit: unum dei nomen in omnibus gentibus sanctum est. adest enim semper in se sperantibus sanctis suis et, ubicumque inuocatum fuerit, praesentem opem tribuit.
The cause of confession is also taken from this: "For you have magnified your holy name above all things." The name of God is not known to one nation only: it has been magnified above all things, and the greatness of its holiness extends to all. No barbarian, no Scythian, no slave, no free, no woman, no man, no age is set apart: for the name of God has been magnified above all things. The temples have collapsed, the idols are mute, the soothsayers fall silent at the intervention of the saints, faith deceives the augurs: the one name of God is holy among all nations. For he is always present among his saints who hope in him, and wherever he is called upon he gives present help.
137.11CSEL 22:740
Ait enim: in quacumque die inuocauero te, exaudi me. nullum diem iustus quisque sine metu transigit, neque anxia semper erga se fides securi temporis otium recipit. scit omnes dies plenos insidiarum sibi esse, diabolo atque eius angelis excidium sibi semper mouente. scit diem illam domini occultam, insperatam, modo nocturni furis repentinam futuram. ut igitur se in quacumque die inuocantem exaudiat, deprecatur. nec diffidit, quid in quacumque die exauditus obtineat. sequitur enim: multiplicabis me in anima mea in uirtute tua. per multam scilicet dei curam multiplicabitur ipse in animse uirtute, ne quid in se tribulationibus, ne quid terroribus pateat, sed, cum temptationes ingruent, cum metus incidet, omnia multiplicata animae uirtute tolerentur.
For he says: "On whatever day I call upon you, hear me." No righteous person spends any day without fear, nor does faith, always anxious about itself, admit the leisure of a secure time. He knows that all days are full of snares for him, the devil and his angels always plotting his destruction. He knows that the day of the Lord will be hidden, unexpected, sudden like a thief in the night. He prays, then, that God may hear him calling on whatever day. Nor does he doubt what he will obtain when heard on whatever day. For there follows: "You will multiply me in my soul in your power." Through God's great care, namely, he will be multiplied in the power of the soul, so that nothing in him may lie open to tribulations, nothing to terrors, but, when temptations assail and fear falls, all things may be borne by the multiplied power of the soul.
137.12CSEL 22:740–741
Et quia certa spes ista est, ut animae uirtus diuinae misericordiae multiplicetur auxilio, debitam ob id ab omnibus deo confessionem fatetur dicens: confiteantur tibi, domine, omnes reges terrse: quia audierunt omnia uerba oris tui. et cantent in uiis domini, quoniam magna est gloria domini; quoniam excelsus dominus et humilia respicit et alta de longe agnoscit. et quos reges terrse propheta significet, iam in plurimis psalmis ostensum est. reges non gentium, sed terrse, id est sui uniuscuiusque corporis regem desinente a se regno peccati. uocati enim sumus in regnum caelorum ex regno mortis euerso: mors enim regnauit ab Adam usque ad Moysen: et iam unusquisque rex suus est secundum apostolum: iam sine nobis regnatis. horum igitur confessio deo digna est. audierunt enim omnia uerba oris dei et in reges se constitutos sciunt.
And since this hope is certain, that the power of the soul will be multiplied by the help of divine mercy, he declares that confession is therefore owed to God by all, saying: "Let all the kings of the earth confess to you, O Lord, for they have heard all the words of your mouth. And let them sing in the ways of the Lord, for great is the glory of the Lord; for the Lord is high and regards the lowly, and knows the lofty from afar." Whom the prophet means by kings of the earth has already been shown in very many psalms: kings not of nations but of the earth, that is, each king of his own body, the reign of sin having ceased in him. For we have been called into the kingdom of heaven, the kingdom of death having been overthrown: for death reigned from Adam to Moses; and now each is his own king, according to the apostle: "Already without us you reign." The confession of these, then, is worthy of God. For they have heard all the words of God's mouth and know they have been made kings.
137.13CSEL 22:741–742
Neque solum confiteantur, sed et cantent in uiis domini, non transgredientes uias dei, sed in his euntes. uise autem dei sunt prophetae omnes et apostoli, in unam uiam unumquemque uia sua dirigentes. et quod ex omnibus in unam uiam concurratur, propheta demonstrat dicens: state in uiis domini et interrogate semitas dei aeternales et uidete, quae est uia bona, et ambulate in ea. uise enim domini aeternae. in his itaque uiis domini cantandum est et hymnis prophetalibus concinendum, quia magna dei gloria est; magnificentise enim eius non est finis. nam magnitudinem gloriae suse opera testantur, caelum, terra, maria, aether. homo ipse, qui rationis particeps ad horum cognitionem perfectus est, ut per haec uisibilia inuisibilem dei gloriam contueretur.
And not only are they to confess, but also to sing in the ways of the Lord, not overstepping the ways of God but going in them. The ways of God are all the prophets and apostles, each directing his own way into the one way. And that from all one runs together into one way, the prophet shows, saying: "Stand in the ways of the Lord, and ask for the eternal paths of God, and see which is the good way, and walk in it." For the ways of the Lord are eternal. In these ways of the Lord, then, we must sing and join in prophetic hymns, because the glory of God is great; for of his greatness there is no end. For his works testify to the greatness of his glory: heaven, earth, seas, the upper air, and man himself, who, sharing in reason, has been perfected for knowledge of these things, so that through these visible things he might behold the invisible glory of God.
137.14CSEL 22:742
Neque solum magna est dei gloria, sed etiam excelsus est et humilia respicit. hinc eminentis celsitudinis suae admiratio maxima est, quod humilia respicit, qui excelsus est. sed quae humilia respicit? nempe ista: cor contribulatum et humiliatum deus non spernit; et rursum: et super quem respiciam, nisi super humilem et trementem uerba mea? sed qui excelsus humilia respicit, habet in se aliam quoque admirationem, quod et alta de longe agnoscit. superbse et insolentes cogitationes deum non fallunt: agnoscit omnia, et nihil scientiae eius inpenetrabile est. deus, ut scriptum est, prope est his, qui tribulato sunt corde; non admiscetur autem adrogantibus, neque insolentibus prope est. unicuique nostrum pro fidei diuersitate aut proximus est aut remotus, spiritali uirtute, ubi se dignum est, adquiescens. et ideo alta a longe cognoscit, quia et per indignitatem abest ab insolente et per uirtutem, longe licet, quae sunt superba cognoscit.
And not only is God's glory great, but he is also high and regards the lowly. Hence the greatest wonder at his surpassing loftiness is that he who is high regards the lowly. But what lowly things does he regard? Surely these: "A contrite and humbled heart God does not despise"; and again: "And upon whom shall I look but upon the humble and him who trembles at my words?" But he who, being high, regards the lowly has in himself another wonder too, that he also knows the lofty from afar. Proud and insolent thoughts do not deceive God: he knows all things, and nothing is impenetrable to his knowledge. God, as it is written, is near to those who are of a troubled heart; but he does not mingle with the arrogant, nor is he near the insolent. To each of us, according to the difference of faith, he is either near or far, resting by spiritual power where it is worthy of him. And therefore he knows the lofty from afar, because he is absent from the insolent through their unworthiness, and by his power, though far off, he knows what is proud.
137.15CSEL 22:742–743
Si ambulauero in medio tribulationis, uiuificabis me. non abnuit iustus iste, ne in mediis tribulationibus ambulet. scit enim, quia tribulatio secundum apostolum patientiam operatur. scit inprobabile aurum non placere, scit uictorem militem nisi bello non futurum, scit intemptatam fidem languere, scit in tribulationibus secundum apostolum gloriandum. scit inparem se tribulationibus sine auxilio dei esse; et idcirco per deum salutis suse certus est et, cum in mediis tribulationibus ambulet, per eundem se uiuificandum esse confidit. ait enim: super iram inimicorum meorum extendisti manus tuas: et saluum me fecit dextera tua. dominus retribuet pro me. irascentibus inimicis nos extensa manus dei protegit. tribulationes enim inimici adferunt irascentes fidei et spei nostrae: quia aduersarius noster secundum apostolum diabolus tamquam leo rugiens ambulat, quaerens nos deuorare. sed super iram inimicorum, per quos diabolus semper operatur, manus domini extenditur, et sperantes in se saluos facit dextera eius. uirtus significatur in dextera; et ideo dominus, qui dei uirtus et dei sapientia est, nonnunquam dei dextera nuncupatur et cognominatur, per quem aduersus omnes inimicos in omni tribulationum bello protegemur.
"If I walk in the midst of tribulation, you will give me life." This righteous man does not refuse to walk in the midst of tribulations. For he knows that tribulation, according to the apostle, works patience. He knows that untested gold does not please, he knows that a soldier will not be victorious except in war, he knows that untried faith languishes, he knows that, according to the apostle, we must glory in tribulations. He knows that he is unequal to tribulations without God's help; and therefore through God he is sure of his salvation and trusts that, walking in the midst of tribulations, he will be given life through the same. For he says: "Against the anger of my enemies you stretched out your hands, and your right hand saved me. The Lord will repay for me." When enemies are angry, the outstretched hand of God protects us. For enemies, angry at our faith and hope, bring tribulations: because our adversary, according to the apostle, the devil, like a roaring lion, walks about seeking to devour us. But over the anger of the enemies, through whom the devil always works, the hand of the Lord is stretched out, and his right hand saves those who hope in him. Power is signified by the right hand; and therefore the Lord, who is the power of God and the wisdom of God, is sometimes called and named the right hand of God, through whom we shall be protected against all enemies in every war of tribulations.
137.16CSEL 22:743
Seruauit autem euangelicae mansuetudinis propheta rationem, qua iniuriam reddere his, qui nos persecuntur, inhibemur, dicens: dominus retribuet pro me. illi enim uindicta seruanda est, qui in calumnia uestis dimitti et pallium iussit, qui post iniuriam alapae unius praeberi et maxillam alteram uoluit, qui uetuit malum pro malo reddi: plus uindictae adepturis his, qui aeterno iudici ultionem prsesentis iniuriae reseruassent.
The prophet has kept the reasoning of Gospel meekness, by which we are forbidden to repay injury to those who persecute us, saying: "The Lord will repay for me." For vengeance is to be reserved for him who commanded that, in a lawsuit over a tunic, the cloak be let go too, who willed that after the injury of one blow the other cheek also be offered, who forbade returning evil for evil: those who reserve the punishment of present injury for the eternal Judge will obtain more vengeance.
137.17CSEL 22:743–744
Concludit deinde fidelissimae spei uoce: domine, misericordia tua in saeculum. opera manuum tuarum non omittas: ut, quia dei misericordia in saeculum est extendens super iram inimicorum manum suam et fideles suos protegens dextera sua et pro his retribuens, opera manuum suarum non omittat, hominem scilicet, qui ait: manus tuse fecerunt me cetera. nonnunquam manu dei facta commemorari solent: homo uero semper manibus effectus, nobiliore in eum opere ex manuum connumeratione monstrato. ut igitur hunc non omittat precatur et sit ei auxiliator assiduus per eum et in eo, qui ait: ecce ego uobiscum sum omnibus diebus usque in consummationem saeculi! dominum nostrum Iesum Christum, qui est benedictus in saecula saeculorum. amen.
Then he concludes with the voice of most faithful hope: "O Lord, your mercy is for ever; do not neglect the works of your hands": so that, since the mercy of God is for ever, stretching out his hand against the anger of enemies, protecting his faithful with his right hand, and repaying on their behalf, he may not neglect the works of his hands, namely man, who says: "Your hands made me," and the rest. Things made by the hand of God are sometimes mentioned; but man is always made by hands, a nobler work toward him being shown by the counting of hands. He prays, then, that he may not neglect him and may be his constant helper, through and in him who says: "Behold, I am with you all days, even to the consummation of the age," our Lord Jesus Christ, who is blessed for ever and ever. Amen.
Tractates 138
138.1CSEL 22:744–745
Omnis quidem propheticus sermo ex diuini spiritus instinctu profectus est. et hoc non in obscuro est, cum legimus: haec dicit dominus; et iterum: audite uerba domini: et rursum: quoniam dominus locutus est; et in eodem: os enim domini locutum est ista. de psalmis autem ipse dominus in euangeliis confirmat, cum ait de se: si, inquit, Dauid in spiritu uocat eum dominum, quomodo dicitis, quod filius eius est? docens omnia Dauid spiritu prophetico elocutum. locutum autem de se licet in hoc loco eodem ostenderit, cum ait ab eo dominum se esse in spiritu nuncupatum, absolutius tamen ostendit, in psalmis sacramentum omne corporei aduentus sui contineri, dicens: haec sunt uerba mea, quae locutus sum ad uos, cum adhuc essem uobiscum, quoniam oportebat omnia inpleri, quae scripta sunt in lege Moysi et in prophetis et psalmis de me. non est ergo ambiguum, quod in psalmis de eo scriptum sit. nam tametsi pleraque in his talia sint, ut ad personam patriarcharum, prophetarum, martyrum, apostolorum generationis quoque primae et generationis sequentis referri oporteant, tamen, quia omnia in Christo et per Christum sunt, quidquid illud in psalmis est sub diuersorum personis prophetatum, omne de ipso est: quia doctrina omnis, diuersis licet praeceptorum generibus multiformis, hoc per diuersos praestat, ut ipse noscatur. haec nobis propter praesentem psalmum commemoranda necessario fuerunt, ne forte sine probabili auctoritate praesumpsisse existimaremur, ut ad personam Christi omnem hanc eius prophetiam referremus.
All prophetic speech proceeds from the prompting of the divine Spirit. And this is not obscure, when we read: "Thus says the Lord"; and again: "Hear the words of the Lord"; and again: "For the Lord has spoken"; and in the same: "For the mouth of the Lord has spoken these things." Concerning the psalms, the Lord himself confirms it in the Gospels, when he says of himself: "If," he says, "David in the Spirit calls him Lord, how do you say that he is his son?" teaching that David spoke everything by the prophetic Spirit. And although in this same place he showed that David spoke of him, when he says he was named Lord by him in the Spirit, yet he showed more completely that the whole mystery of his bodily coming is contained in the psalms, saying: "These are my words which I spoke to you while I was still with you, that everything must be fulfilled that is written in the law of Moses and in the prophets and psalms concerning me." There is no doubt, then, that it is written of him in the psalms. For although many things in them are such that they ought to be referred to the person of the patriarchs, prophets, martyrs, apostles, and of the first generation and the following generation, yet, since all things are in Christ and through Christ, whatever is prophesied in the psalms under the persons of different people is all about him: because all teaching, however manifold in different kinds of precepts, accomplishes this through different people, that he may be known. These things had necessarily to be recalled by us for the sake of the present psalm, lest we should be thought to have presumed without credible authority to refer this whole prophecy to the person of Christ.
138.2CSEL 22:745–746
Diligenter autem ea obseruanda est ratio, ut, quaecumque homini illi, quem ex utero sanctae uirginis adsumpsit et in quo se nasci hominem, qui deus erat, uoluit, apta esse et congrua uidebuntur, cum debita caelesti naturae suse dignitate tractentur neque sacramentum salutis nostrae, quo in forma dei manens formam serui accepit, ad contumeliam indemutabilis suae et inuisibilis et incorporese et inpassibilis substantiae coaptemus. quod enim homo fuit, nobis profecit, sibi nihil dempsit. exinaniuit enim se in forma dei manens, ut et forma hominis esset, non ut forma dei esse desineret. ait enim ipse: qusecumque pater facit, eadem et filius facit similiter. numquid in forma serui manens uirtutem et diuinitatem, qua in forma dei manebat, amisit? cum enim in corpore humilitatis nostrae, quaecumque pater facit, eadem et ipse facit similiter, nihil per consortium carnis a paternse diuinitatis potestate degenerat; neque id corpus, quod adsumptum est, uirtutem naturae antea manentis aboleuit, cum in eo corpore, quod adsumptum est, uirtus naturae antea manentis operetur.
But we must carefully observe this rule: that whatever seems fitting and suited to that man whom he assumed from the womb of the holy virgin, and in whom he, who was God, willed to be born a man, be treated with the dignity due to his heavenly nature, and that we not fit the mystery of our salvation, by which, remaining in the form of God, he took the form of a servant, to an affront against his unchangeable, invisible, incorporeal, and impassible substance. For that he was man profited us and took nothing from him. For he emptied himself while remaining in the form of God, so that he might also be in the form of man, not so that he might cease to be in the form of God. For he himself says: "Whatever the Father does, the Son also does likewise." Did he, remaining in the form of a servant, lose the power and divinity in which he remained in the form of God? For since in the body of our lowliness he does likewise whatever the Father does, he falls short in nothing of the power of the Father's divinity through fellowship with the flesh; nor did the body that was assumed abolish the power of the nature that remained before, since in the body that was assumed the power of the nature that remained before was at work.
138.3CSEL 22:746–747
Itaque si quid infirmum ex persona eius dictum reperietur, ad hominem referri oportet, per quem habitauit in nobis. uerbum enim caro factum est et habitauit in nobis. referendum autem ob id est, quia non alienae aut simulatse naturae hominem adsumpsit. uerbum namque caro factum habitauit in nobis: non in uitia infirmitatesque carnis ex uerbi uirtute deficiens, sed naturae nostrae infirmitates homo natus adsumens. adsumptio autem infirmitatis non fecit infirmum, quia aliud est naturam esse, aliud adsumpsisse naturam. et extra generis necessitatem uoluntatis accessio est. non enim peccator fuit, sed peccata suscepit; neque infirmus extitit, sed portauit infirmitates. ipse enim secundum prophetam peccata nostra suscepit et infirmitates nostras portauit. et ne quid in inpassibilem atque indemutabilem diuinitatem infirmitatis incidere existimaretur, adiecit: et nos putabamus eum in doloribus esse. suscepit ergo infirmitates, quia homo nascitur; et putatur dolere, quia patitur: caret uero doloribus ipse, quia deus est. et cum habitat in nobis cumque infirmitates nostras suscipit et cum susceptis infirmitatibus non dolet, non potest non esse, qui habitat, nec a se defecisse, qui suscipit, nec abolitus deus esse, qui non dolet. et haec quidem propter prsesentem psalmum commemorata paucis sunt, quia uidetur statim ex persona hominis coepisse, ne per hoc, quod tamquam homo loquitur, decessisse ex paternae diuinitatis gloria uideretur.
So if anything weak is found said in his person, it must be referred to the man through whom he dwelt in us. For "the Word was made flesh and dwelt in us." And it is to be so referred because he assumed a man of a nature not foreign or feigned. For the Word, made flesh, dwelt in us: not failing from the power of the Word into the vices and weaknesses of the flesh, but, born a man, taking on the weaknesses of our nature. The taking on of weakness did not make him weak, because it is one thing to be a nature, another to have taken on a nature. And the addition of will lies outside the necessity of kind. For he was not a sinner, but he took up sins; nor was he weak, but he bore weaknesses. For he himself, according to the prophet, took up our sins and bore our weaknesses. And lest anything of weakness be thought to fall upon the impassible and unchangeable divinity, he added: "And we thought him to be in pains." He took up weaknesses, then, because he is born a man; and he is thought to feel pain, because he suffers; but he himself is free from pains, because he is God. And since he dwells in us, and takes up our weaknesses, and does not feel pain in the weaknesses taken up, he who dwells cannot not exist, nor can he who takes up have failed from himself, nor can he who does not feel pain have been abolished as God. These things have been recalled briefly for the sake of the present psalm, because it seems to begin at once in the person of the man, lest by speaking as a man he should seem to have departed from the glory of the Father's divinity.
138.4CSEL 22:747–748
Ait enim: domine, probasti me et cognouisti me. apostolus, cum nos patientise et spei doctrina erudiret, ait: tribulatio patientiam perficit, patientia autem probationem, probatio uero spem, spes uero non confunditur. et hsec quidem in sanctorum quorumcumque uita atque operibus fuisse cognoscimus, ut multis passionibus tribulationibusque iactati probabiles deo facti sint. si quis enim exulem Abraham et in metu parricidii et caelibatus et in ceterarum passionum iniuriis mansisse fidelem semper meminerit; si quis fugam Iacob et praeter aestiuorum dierum laborem hibernarum noctium uigilias in custodiis ouium recordetur; si quis Moysi quadraginta annorum seruitutem et in eo acerba plebis opprobria et magorum aduersus eum aemulas potestates recenseat: intelleget eos patientia et constantia spei probatos non inmerito id esse praemii consecutos, ut in Abrahae semine gentes benedicerentur, ex Iacob Israhel esset, Moyses Pharao in deum fieret. longum est passiones ceterorum patriarcharum, prophetarum, apostolorum et beata atque inuicta illa Pauli in mari, in fluminibus, in terra, in solitudinibus, in urbibus, in propriis, in exteris, in plagis, in uinculis, in carceribus, in theatris fidei documenta memorare. certe hos omnes patientia probabiles reddidit, per quam non erubescendae spei suae fiduciam probauerunt. sed haec oportunius et plenius suis locis tractari oportet: nunc ad eum, ex cuius persona psalmum consistere diximus, reuertendum est.
For he says: "O Lord, you have proved me and known me." The apostle, when instructing us in the teaching of patience and hope, says: "Tribulation perfects patience, and patience proof, and proof hope, and hope does not put to shame." And we know that this was so in the life and works of all the saints, that, tossed by many sufferings and tribulations, they were made proven before God. For if anyone remembers that Abraham, an exile, remained always faithful in fear of being murdered, in childlessness, and in the injuries of other sufferings; if anyone recalls Jacob's flight and, besides the labor of summer days, the watches of winter nights guarding the sheep; if anyone reviews Moses' servitude of forty years, and in it the bitter reproaches of the people and the rival powers of the magicians against him: he will understand that, proven by patience and constancy of hope, they not undeservedly obtained this reward, that in Abraham's seed the nations should be blessed, that from Jacob Israel should come, that Moses should be made a god to Pharaoh. It is long to recall the sufferings of the other patriarchs, prophets, and apostles, and those blessed and unconquered proofs of Paul's faith at sea, in rivers, on land, in deserts, in cities, among his own and among strangers, in stripes, in chains, in prisons, in theaters. Certainly patience made all these proven, through which they proved the confidence of a hope that does not put to shame. But these things should be treated more fittingly and fully in their own places: now we must return to him in whose person we said the psalm stands.
138.5CSEL 22:748–749
Non confundenda autem persona diuinitatis et corporis est. omnis enim nunc in exordio ex persona eius hominis, quem adsumpsit, oratio est: probasti me, deus, et cognouisti me. probatus est, ut cognosceretur, quia posterior est probatione cognitio. et uideamus secundum euangelicam doctrinam, hic dei filius quomodo sit et probatus et cognitus. humilitas namque eius, per quam meruit ab omni caelesti, terrestri et inferno adorari et in gloria dei patris esse, probatio eius fuit. ita enim apostolus ait: fuit oboediens usque ad mortem, mortem autem crucis: propter hoc exaltauit eum deus et donauit illi nomen, quod est super omne nomen, ut in nomine eius omne genu flectat cselestium et terrestrium et infernorum, et omnis lingua confiteatur, quia dominus Iesus in gloria dei patris. propter hanc itaque usque ad mortem oboedientiam et mortem crucis infirmitas carnis adsumptae in nomine atque honore inmortalitatis et in patris dei gloria conlocatur. dei enim nomen donatur et nomen non sine honore donatur. honor autem, qui donatur, non alius potest esse quam nominis; nomen uero indulti honoris non aliud est quam quod gloria est paterna: ut qui in forma dei manens formam serui accepit, propter oboedientiam formae seruilis cum crucis morte susceptae in gloria dei patris esset, cuius antea manebat in forma. sed hsec apostolus iam de perfectis locutus est: demonstrandum autem in euangeliis est, ubi et probatus et cognitus est.
The person of the divinity and that of the body must not be confused. For the whole prayer now at the beginning is in the person of the man whom he assumed: "You have proved me, O God, and known me." He was proved so that he might be known, because knowledge comes after proof. And let us see, according to the teaching of the Gospels, how this Son of God was both proved and known. For his humility, through which he deserved to be adored by everything in heaven, on earth, and under the earth and to be in the glory of God the Father, was his proving. For thus the apostle says: "He was obedient unto death, even the death of the cross; therefore God exalted him and gave him the name that is above every name, that at his name every knee should bend, of things in heaven and on earth and under the earth, and every tongue confess that the Lord Jesus is in the glory of God the Father." Because of this obedience unto death and the death of the cross, then, the weakness of the flesh assumed is set in the name and honor of immortality and in the glory of God the Father. For the name of God is given, and the name is not given without honor. The honor given can be none other than that of the name; and the name of the honor granted is nothing other than the Father's glory: so that he who, remaining in the form of God, took the form of a servant, should, because of the obedience of the servant's form taken up together with the death of the cross, be in the glory of God the Father, in whose form he was remaining before. But the apostle spoke of these things as already perfected: we must show in the Gospels where he was both proved and known.
138.6CSEL 22:749–750
Humilitas itaque eius probatio est. unigenitus namque deus, peccatorum remissor, aeterni regni dominus baptizari se tamquam peccatorem exposcit. officium istud baptista renuit agnoscens eum, qui sibi potius peccata donaret. ille autem suscepti in se hominis iustitiam etiam sacramento baptismi expleuit: peccati nostri, peccati ipse nescius, particeps fieri non recusat et omnem in se humilitatem caducae carnis adsumens Iordanem turbis peccatorum mixtus ingreditur. probatur in istis omnibus, dum geruntur; sed uideamus, an probatus agnoscitur. ait enim euangelista: et baptizato Iesu confestim ascendit de aqua. et ecce aperti sunt cseli et uidit spiritum dei descendentem de caelo, sicut columbam uenientem in ipsum, et ecce uox de cselo dicens ad eum: hic est filius meus dilectus, in quo conplacui. probationem mox consecuta cognitio est: et quem humilitas probabilem fecerat, hunc paterna uox filium conplacitum sibi, postquam probauit, ostendit. est et probatio, quam statim consecuta cognitio est. in deserto agit, temptationi diaboli subicitur seseque nunc in fastigium templi, nunc in excelsum montem patitur efferri. contumeliae itaque se iniuriae tam grauis dedidit, dum in deserto est, dum condicione temptationis inluditur, dum eleuari potest in templum atque montem. sed temptationum probationem agnoscentis testimonium non reliquit. ait enim scriptura: tunc reliquit eum diabolus, et ecce angeli ministrabant ei. homo temptatur, homo circumfertur, sed post haec angeli ministrant. per probationem cognoscitur, per cognitionem dignus est ministerio angelorum. in ceteris autem quotiens probatus est, totiens et cognitus est. Petrus passionem eius detestatus est, crucis in eo scandalum prse amore et confessse iam a se diuinitatis cognitione non sustinens; sed quia eum ob infidelitatem crucis satanam nuncupasset, non multo post, cum in monte gloriae suae habitu constitisset, tali a patre uoce cognoscitur: hic est filius meus dilectus, in quo conplacui, hunc audite. probationem, quam temptatio apostoli effecerat, paternse uocis agnitio est consecuta.
His humility, then, is his proving. For the only-begotten God, the forgiver of sins, the Lord of the eternal kingdom, asks to be baptized as if a sinner. The Baptist refuses this service, recognizing him as the one who should rather forgive him his sins. But he fulfilled the righteousness of the man taken up into himself even by the sacrament of baptism: he does not refuse to become a sharer in our sin, himself knowing no sin, and, taking upon himself all the humility of perishable flesh, he enters the Jordan mingled with the crowds of sinners. He is proved in all these things as they are done; but let us see whether, proved, he is acknowledged. For the evangelist says: "And when Jesus had been baptized, he came up at once from the water. And behold, the heavens were opened and he saw the Spirit of God descending from heaven like a dove coming upon him, and behold a voice from heaven saying to him: This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased." Knowledge soon followed the proof: and him whom humility had made proven, the Father's voice, after proving him, showed to be his Son, well-pleasing to him. There is also a proving that knowledge followed at once. He spends time in the desert, is subjected to the devil's temptation, and allows himself to be carried now to the pinnacle of the temple, now to a high mountain. So he gave himself to the affront of so grave an injury: while he is in the desert, while he is mocked by the condition of temptation, while he can be lifted up to the temple and the mountain. But the proving of the temptations did not lack the testimony of one who acknowledges him. For Scripture says: "Then the devil left him, and behold, angels ministered to him." A man is tempted, a man is carried about, but after this angels minister. Through proving he is known; through being known he is worthy of the ministry of angels. And in the rest, as often as he was proved, so often was he also known. Peter rejected his passion, not enduring the stumbling block of the cross in him, out of love and out of the knowledge of the divinity he had already confessed; but because he had called him Satan for unbelief in the cross, not long after, when he stood on the mountain in the appearance of his glory, he is acknowledged by such a voice from the Father: "This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased; hear him." The acknowledgement of the Father's voice followed the proving that the apostle's temptation had brought about.
138.7CSEL 22:750–751
Dehinc sequitur: cognouisti sessionem meam et resurrectionem meam. in sessione doctrinam significari euangelica auctoritas est. sessiones autem nobiscum hae sunt, quae a Graecis cathedrae nuncupantur. Moyses cathedram habuit secundum domini dictum: super Moysi cathedram sederunt scribae et Pharisaei. omnia ergo, quse dicunt uobis, facite et obseruate: secundum autem opera eorum nolite facere; dicunt enim et non faciunt. cum igitur doctrina Pharisaeorum ob id probabilis esse doceatur, quia ipsi in Moysi cathedra sederunt, doctrina necessario significatur in cathedra. cognouit itaque sessionem, cum dignitatem eius in omnibus praedicat. cum uoluntatem eius, qui se misit, exsequitur, cum humilitati corporis sui gloriam postulans audit e cselo: et honorificaui et honorificabo. sed doctrina non minus in sessione eius, quam in surrectione opus cognoscitur. nam ut sessio doctrinae praeceptum est, ita et surrectio operationis effectus est. sedens Iesus docuit in monte; sed post doctrinam ad opera descendit. ita enim scriptum est: et descendente eo de monte secutae sunt eum turbse. et ecce leprosus quidam ueniens adorabat eum dicens: domine, si uis, potes me mundare. et extendens manum tetigit eum Iesus dicens: uolo, mundare. ad sanandam quoque centurionis filiam surrexit dominus; scriptum est enim: et surgens Iesus sequebatur eum cum discipulis suis. cum autem perfectum illud in lauandis apostolorum pedibus humilitatis suae officium expleuit, ita legimus: surrexit a cena et posuit uestimenta sua et accepto linteo praecinxit se. cognoscitur itaque in sessione eius et surrectione doctrina atque opus, quia et sermone et opere dei in se patris gloriam praedicabat.
Then follows: "You have known my sitting down and my rising up." That teaching is signified by sitting is the authority of the Gospel. The seats we speak of are those which the Greeks call cathedrae. Moses had a chair, according to the Lord's saying: "The scribes and Pharisees have sat on the chair of Moses. So do and observe all that they tell you; but do not do according to their works; for they speak and do not do." Since, then, the teaching of the Pharisees is taught to be acceptable because they sat on the chair of Moses, teaching is necessarily signified by the chair. He knew his sitting, then, when he proclaims his dignity in all things, when he carries out the will of him who sent him, when, asking glory for the humility of his body, he hears from heaven: "I have both glorified it and will glorify it." But no less than teaching in his sitting, work is known in his rising. For as sitting is the precept of teaching, so rising is the effect of working. Jesus taught sitting on the mountain; but after teaching he went down to works. For thus it is written: "And when he came down from the mountain, crowds followed him. And behold, a leper came and worshipped him, saying: Lord, if you will, you can make me clean. And stretching out his hand Jesus touched him, saying: I will; be clean." The Lord also rose to heal the centurion's daughter; for it is written: "And Jesus rose and followed him with his disciples." And when he fulfilled that perfect service of his humility in washing the apostles' feet, we read thus: "He rose from supper and laid aside his garments and, taking a towel, girded himself." So teaching and work are known in his sitting and rising, because by word and by work he proclaimed the glory of God the Father in himself.
138.8CSEL 22:751–752
Intellexisti omnes cogitationes meas de longe. scrutans corda et renes deus est; et quomodo de longe cogitationes eius intellectae sunt? de longe non ad locum, sed ad tempus refert. non enim de longe intellegis ait, ut significatio loci esse credatur, tamquam longe ab humanis operibus situs uirtutis suae scientia ea, quae cogitantur, intellegat: sed de longe intellexisti, praeteriti potius temporis significans aetatem. et ubi istud, quod longe ante cogitationes suas cognouerit, reperiemus? nempe ubi dicitur: ecce puer meus, quem elegi, dilectus meus, in quo conplacuit anima mea: ponam spiritum meum super eum, et iudicium gentibus nuntiabit. non clamabit, non contendet, neque quisquam in plateis uocem eius audiet. et huius prophetise tum euangelista meminit, cum his, quos curabat, ut de se tacerent iubebat. has ergo cogitationes eius, humilitatis scilicet et patientise, longe ante intellexit, quia de his erat prophetarum ore testatus.
"You have understood all my thoughts from afar." God is the searcher of hearts and reins; and how were his thoughts understood from afar? "From afar" refers not to place but to time. For he does not say "you understand from afar," so that a meaning of place might be believed, as though the knowledge of his power, placed far from human works, understood what is thought; but "you have understood from afar," signifying rather an age of past time. And where shall we find that he knew his thoughts long before? Surely where it is said: "Behold my servant, whom I have chosen, my beloved, in whom my soul is well pleased; I will put my Spirit upon him, and he will announce judgment to the nations. He will not cry out, he will not quarrel, nor will anyone hear his voice in the streets." And the evangelist recalls this prophecy when he commanded those he healed to be silent about him. These thoughts of his, then, of humility and patience, he understood long before, because he had testified of them through the mouth of the prophets.
138.9CSEL 22:752
Semitam meam et directionem meam inuestigasti. est autem de semita et directione, antequam id ipsum tractatur, non nihilum prseloquendum. id namque, quod nobiscum semita est, alia uirtute atque intellegentia cum Graecis est: τρίβον enim nuncupant, id est frequenti ingressu discursuque contritam, per quam non semel neque aliquando, sed semper incessum sit. quod autem nostri directionem transtulerunt, id illi ex hebrseo σχοινίον interpretati sunt. σχοινίον autem quarundam gentium consuetudine certum et constitutum modum itineris significat, ut, quod nos milia, id illi σχοινίον nuncupent
"You have searched out my path and my measured way." Before treating this, something must be said in advance about "path" and "measured way." What with us is "path" has another force and meaning among the Greeks: for they call it τρίβον, that is, worn by frequent going and running about, a way walked not once or occasionally but always. And what our translators rendered as directio, they translated from the Hebrew as σχοινίον. Σχοινίον, by the custom of certain nations, means a fixed and set measure of journey, so that what we call miles, they call σχοινίον.
138.10CSEL 22:752–753
Dominus itaque noster in corpore, quod adsumpsit, iam transcursam a se atque tritam in prophetis semitam percucurrit et certum constitutumque sibi itineris sui finem confecit. quod autem per tritam prsedicationis semitam ambulauerit, audiamus ipsum dicentem: Hierusalem, Hierusalem, quae occidis prophetas et lapidas eos, qui ad te missi sunt. quotiens uolui colligere filios tuos, sicut gallina congregans pullos suos, et noluisti! quotiens cum ait, frequentiam numerosae significationis ostendit. nihil ergo noui et egit et passus est, cum per nolentem congregari filios suos Hierusalem totiens et auditus et inhonoratus est in prophetis.
Our Lord, then, in the body he assumed, ran the path already traversed and worn by him in the prophets, and completed the fixed and set end of his journey. That he walked by the worn path of preaching, let us hear him saying: "Jerusalem, Jerusalem, you who kill the prophets and stone those sent to you, how often I would have gathered your children as a hen gathers her chicks, and you would not!" When he says "how often," he shows the frequency of a numerous meaning. He did and suffered nothing new, then, when through Jerusalem, which was unwilling for her children to be gathered, he was so often both heard and dishonored in the prophets.
138.11CSEL 22:753
Quod autem definitum et prsescriptum iter confecturus esset, ostenditur in eo, cum ait: ego te honorificaui super terram, opus consummaui, quod dedisti mihi. qui datum sibi opus consummat, modum prsescriptse operationis expleuit. scit autem sibi constitutum esse, quid gerere oporteat, cum ait Petro gladio his, qui ad prehendendum eum uenerant, resistenti: calicem, quem dedit mihi pater meus, non bibam illum? docens se prsescriptse sibi a patre passionis calicem esse bibiturum. scit se etiam semitam suam directionemque conplesse, cum poto aceto spiritum traditurus ait: consummatum est! et mox tradidit spiritum.
That he was to complete a defined and prescribed journey is shown when he says: "I have glorified you on earth; I have finished the work you gave me." He who finishes the work given him has fulfilled the measure of the prescribed work. And he knows that what he must do has been set for him, when he says to Peter, resisting with a sword those who had come to seize him: "The cup my Father has given me, shall I not drink it?" teaching that he would drink the cup of the passion prescribed for him by the Father. He knows too that he has completed his path and measured way when, having drunk the vinegar, about to give up his spirit, he says: "It is finished!" and at once gave up his spirit.
138.12CSEL 22:753–754
Hanc ergo semitam et directionem suam pater inuestigauit. inuestigauit autem, cum per prophetam de sorte uestis prophetauit, ut scriptum est: et super uestimentum meum miserunt sortem. et iterum, cum de tradito inter latrones atque suspenso recognita est prophetia dicens: et cum iniquis sestimatus est; uel cum de osse intacto atque inpresso uulnere ante praedictum est: os eius non confringetis et: uidebunt, quem conpunxerunt. haec itaque, quae ei omnia erant in passione praescripta, a deo peruestigata sunt, ut et fuerint prophetata. ac ne quid ex his, quae gessit ac passus est, incognitum fuisse patri existimaretur, generaliter cuncta conplexus est dicens: et omnes uias meas prseuidisti. sed qui praeuidit, uidit antequam res esset. prseuidit autem etiam hoc: quia non est dolus in lingua mea; est enim secundum propriam professionem ueritas, uia, uita. non recipit dolum ueritas; non enim mentitus est aut fefellit: lingua omnis eius officio functa est ueritatis, qui ait: cselum et terra praeteribunt, uerba autem mea non praeteribunt. patrem deum prsedicat, se uero esse et hominis et dei filium confitetur. dolum prsedicatio ista non habuit, quae de se et de honore eius, qui se miserat, fatebatur.
This path and measured way of his, then, the Father searched out. He searched it out when he prophesied through the prophet about the lot for his garment, as it is written: "And for my garment they cast lots"; and again, when concerning his being handed over and hanged among robbers the prophecy was recognized that says: "And he was reckoned with the lawless"; or when it was foretold about the unbroken bone and the inflicted wound: "You shall not break a bone of his," and: "They will look on him whom they pierced." These things, then, all prescribed for him in the passion, were searched out by God, so that they were also prophesied. And lest anything he did and suffered should be thought unknown to the Father, he embraced everything in general, saying: "And you have foreseen all my ways." But he who foresaw saw before the thing existed. He foresaw this too: "for there is no deceit in my tongue"; for he is, by his own declaration, the truth, the way, the life. Truth does not admit deceit; for he did not lie or deceive: his whole tongue performed the office of truth, he who says: "Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will not pass away." He proclaims God the Father, and confesses that he himself is Son both of man and of God. This preaching, which declared things about himself and about the honor of him who sent him, had no deceit.
138.13CSEL 22:754
Proficit deinde paulatim sermo coeptus ab homine et ad significationem naturae in eo caelestis extollitur, cum ait: ecce tu, domine, cognouisti omnia nouissima et antiqua: tu formasti me et posuisti super me manum tuam. mirabilis facta est scientia tua ex me: confortata est, non potero ad eam. personse istud prophetae non conuenit, ut ex se dixisse uideatur: mirabilis facta est scientia tua ex me, ut mirabilis dei cognitio ex eo facta sit, Moyse antea cognitionem nobis dei libris legis loquente. sed ne ipsi quidem Moysi hoc esse proprium potuerit deum, antequam flagrantem rubum conspicit, nescienti, opinione quidem electi in Abraham et Isaac et Iacob populi sui religioso, uerumtamen familiarem cognitionem ante hoc tempus nisi, deo non adepto. sed omnis sermo iste ei conpetit, qui ait: pater, manifestaui nomen tuum hominibus et qui ait: haec autem est uita seterna, ut cognoscant te solum et uerum deum et quem misisti Iesum Christum. sed haec suo loco plenius prosequemur.
Then the speech, begun from the man, gradually advances and is raised to signify the heavenly nature in him, when he says: "Behold, you, O Lord, have known all things, the last and the ancient: you formed me and laid your hand upon me. Your knowledge has been made wonderful from me; it is strengthened, I cannot attain to it." It does not suit the person of the prophet that he should seem to have said of himself, "Your knowledge has been made wonderful from me," as though the wonderful knowledge of God had been made from him, since Moses had earlier spoken the knowledge of God to us in the books of the law. But not even to Moses himself could this have been proper, who did not know God before he saw the burning bush, religious indeed in his belief in the people chosen in Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, yet not having obtained familiar knowledge of God before this time. But this whole speech belongs to him who says: "Father, I have manifested your name to men," and who says: "And this is eternal life, that they know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom you have sent." But we shall pursue these things more fully in their place.
138.14CSEL 22:754–755
Descendendum autem ad id est secundum ordinem dictorum: ecce tu, domine, cognouisti omnia nouissima et antiqua. nouissima sunt, cum probasti, cum cognouisti, et cetera, quse propria sunt eius hominis, quem adsumpsit. antiqua sunt, quae modum non habent, quae indefiniti temporis significant uetustatem. in principio erat uerbum, et omnia per eum facta sunt.
We must go down to this according to the order of the words: "Behold, you, O Lord, have known all things, the last and the ancient." The last things are when you proved, when you knew, and the rest that are proper to the man whom he assumed. The ancient things are those that have no measure, that signify the antiquity of indefinite time: "In the beginning was the Word," and "all things were made through him."
138.15CSEL 22:755
Dehinc ut nouissima deus et antiqua cognouit, ita in eo, quod sequitur: tu formasti me et posuisti super me manum tuam, utrumque significat: ut, quod formauit, antiquum sit, quod superposuit manum, nouissimum sit. quod enim secundum naturam diuinitatis formatus sit, apostolus docet dicens: qui cum in forma dei esset; quod enim in forma est, formatur in formam et quidem paternae naturae et diuinitatis formam. et nescio, an, quod formatus in forma serui est, referri possit ad patrem, ut formatus ab ipso sit: sapientia enim ipsa sibi sedificauit domum. sed hinc nec temporis nec quaestionis est amplius loqui. quod autem proprie ad corpoream natiuitatem referri oporteat: et posuisti super me manum tuam, ita docemur ex persona patris: inueni Dauid seruum meum, in oleo sancto meo unxi eum. manus enim mea auxiliabitur illi et brachium meum confortabit eum. nihil proficiet inimicus in eo, et filius iniquitatis non adiciet nocere eum. et non est ambiguum, omnem hunc psalmum ad personam domini esse referendum: quia ea omnia in eo sint, quae et diuinitati ipsius propria sint et a naturae nostrae infirmitate dissentiant.
Then, as God knew the last and the ancient things, so in what follows, "You formed me and laid your hand upon me," he signifies both: that his forming is the ancient, and his laying on of the hand the last. That he was formed according to the nature of divinity the apostle teaches, saying: "Who, though he was in the form of God"; for what is in a form is formed into a form, and indeed into the form of the Father's nature and divinity. And I do not know whether his being formed in the form of a servant can be referred to the Father, so that he was formed by him: for Wisdom herself built herself a house. But this is not the time or the question for saying more. And that "you laid your hand upon me" ought properly to be referred to the bodily birth, we are taught thus from the person of the Father: "I have found David my servant; with my holy oil I have anointed him. For my hand will help him, and my arm will strengthen him. The enemy will gain nothing against him, and the son of iniquity will not again harm him." And there is no doubt that this whole psalm is to be referred to the person of the Lord, since everything is in it that is both proper to his divinity and at odds with the weakness of our nature.
138.16CSEL 22:755–756
Et quia utroque in tempore, id est nouissimo et antiquo, uel ipse praedicando uel in apostolis et prophetis loquendo cognitionem ex se dei mirabilem fecit, ait: mirabilis facta est scientia tua ex me. sed mirabilis quomodo? nempe cum omnia esse intra deum docentur, dum deus esse in omnibus praedicatur, dum inmensa et inconprehensibilis natura intus atque extra manens locos omnes, quibus contineri possit, excedat. mirabile est deum ubique esse et nusquam abesse; in omnibus esse et totum esse, et extra locos ac tempora pro infinitate atque seternitate sua semper esse. hoc mirificum, hoc confortatum, id est sine infirmis iam intellegentise opinione firmatum.
And since in both times, that is, the last and the ancient, either by preaching himself or by speaking in the apostles and prophets, he made the knowledge of God wonderful from himself, he says: "Your knowledge has been made wonderful from me." But wonderful how? Surely when all things are taught to be within God, while God is proclaimed to be in all things, while a boundless and incomprehensible nature, remaining within and without, exceeds all places by which it could be contained. It is wonderful that God is everywhere and nowhere absent; that he is in all things and whole, and always outside places and times by his infinity and eternity. This is wondrous, this strengthened, that is, made firm without the opinion of a weak understanding any longer.
138.17CSEL 22:756–757
Sed quid est istud, quod dicitur: non potero ad eam? unigenitus ait: omnia, quae patris sunt, mea sunt; et: sicut habet pater uitam in semetipso, ita et filio dedit uitam habere in semetipso; et: sicut pater uiuificat mortuos, ita et filius quos uult uiuificat similiter; et: ego et pater unum sumus. nulla discretio potestatis in uerbis est, nulla enim differentia uirtutis in factis est. "unum sumus" plerique inreligiosorum ad uoluntatis tantum concordiam rettulerunt. sed cum dicitur: uel operibus meis credite, quia pater in me et ego in patre. non tantum uoluntatis unitas, sed etiam diuinse uirtutis ostenditur. ergo cum omnia, quae pater faciat, omnia faciat et filius — eadem enim facit similiter — quserendum est, quid sit, quod dictum est: non potero ad eam. sed cum audio: pater maior me est; et rursum: non potest filius facere a se quicquam, nisi quod uiderit patrem facientem, haec mihi intellegentiam suggerunt dicti huius: non potero ad eam. est enim maior pater filio, sed ut pater filio, generatione, non genere: filius enim est et ex eo exiuit. et licet paternse nuncupationis proprietas differat, tamen natura non differt: natus enim a deo deus non dissimilis est a gignente substantia. non potest ergo ad eum, ex quo est: nam quamuis alter in altero per uniformem ac similem eiusdem naturae gloriam maneat, tamen ei, ex quo genitus est, non exaequari in eo uidetur posse, quod genuit.
But what is this that is said: "I cannot attain to it"? The Only-begotten says: "All that the Father has is mine"; and: "As the Father has life in himself, so he has given the Son also to have life in himself"; and: "As the Father raises the dead, so the Son also gives life to whom he will, likewise"; and: "I and the Father are one." There is no distinction of power in the words, for there is no difference of might in the deeds. Many of the irreligious have referred "we are one" only to agreement of will. But when it is said, "Or believe my works, that the Father is in me and I in the Father," not only unity of will but also of divine power is shown. Since, then, the Son does all that the Father does (for he does the same things likewise), we must ask what it is that is said: "I cannot attain to it." But when I hear, "The Father is greater than I," and again, "The Son can do nothing of himself except what he sees the Father doing," these suggest to me the understanding of this saying, "I cannot attain to it." For the Father is greater than the Son, but as Father than Son, by generation, not by kind: for he is the Son and came forth from him. And although the property of the name of Father differs, yet the nature does not differ: for God born from God is not unlike the begetting substance. He cannot, then, attain to him from whom he is: for although each remains in the other through the uniform and like glory of the same nature, yet he does not seem able to be made equal to him from whom he was begotten in this, that he begot.
138.18CSEL 22:757
Et uideamus, an hoc, quod non poterit ad eam, ad dignitatem paternse confessionis relatum sit. sequitur enim: quo ibo a spiritu tuo, et a facie tua quo fugiam? si ascendero in caelum, tu illic es; si descendero in infernum, ades; si sumpsero pinnas meas ante lucem et habitauero in postremis maris: etenim illuc manus tua deducet me, et tenebit me dextera tua. non excedit paternam filius infinitatem; neque naturam, quae ultra locos omnes est, is, qui in sinu est, transgreditur. sit licet in caelo, sit in inferno et ultra postrema maris euolet, adest tamen ille ubicumque, qui ubique est: nec subterfugi potest, intra quem omnia sunt et qui in omnibus est.
And let us see whether this, that he cannot attain to it, has been referred to the dignity of confessing the Father. For there follows: "Where shall I go from your Spirit, and where shall I flee from your face? If I ascend into heaven, you are there; if I descend into hell, you are present; if I take my wings before the light and dwell in the uttermost parts of the sea, even there your hand will lead me, and your right hand will hold me." The Son does not exceed the Father's infinity; nor does he who is in the bosom pass beyond the nature that is beyond all places. Though he be in heaven, though in hell, and fly beyond the uttermost parts of the sea, yet he is present everywhere who is everywhere; nor can one escape from him within whom all things are and who is in all things.
138.19CSEL 22:757–758
Et ne inreligiose ad contumeliam indemutabilis atque inpassibilis substantiae quaedam opinemur ex eo, quod dictum est: aut a facie tua quo fugiam? ut uideatur fugam ob passionis metum cogitasse: dictorum ratio noscenda est, ut incolumi dignitate haec necessario commemorata esse intellegantur. nemo autem eorum, qui in studiis doctrinae caelestis demorantur, poterit ambigere deum atque hominem dominum nostrum Iesum Christum confiteri: et hominem quidem in tempore, deum uero semper et ante hominem et post hominem, utrumque uero, deum scilicet atque hominem. tunc tantum, cum in homine fuit. erat enim in forma dei et formam hominis accepit; et rursum in gloria dei patris est forma uidelicet seruili in gloriam eius, cuius in forma ante manebat, proficiente, corruptionis scilicet natura per profectum incorruptionis absorta.
And lest we irreligiously form opinions to the affront of the unchangeable and impassible substance from the saying, "Or where shall I flee from your face?", as though he seemed to have thought of flight for fear of suffering, the reasoning of the words must be learned, so that these things may be understood to have been necessarily mentioned with his dignity unharmed. None of those who dwell in the study of heavenly teaching can doubt that we confess our Lord Jesus Christ as God and man: man in time, but God always, both before the man and after the man, and both, that is, God and man, only when he was in the man. For he was in the form of God and took the form of man; and again he is in the glory of God the Father, the form of a servant advancing into the glory of him in whose form he remained before, the nature of corruption, namely, being swallowed up by advance into incorruption.
138.20CSEL 22:758
Cum igitur psalmum hunc coeptum ex persona hominis, quem adsumpsit, meminerimus, diligenter contuendum est ut intellegamus, quid diuinitati eius, quid homini sit aptandum: atque ita, ut sensum nostrum dictis magis applicemus, quam per fallacis intellegentise opinionem sensui dicta subdamus. ait enim: quo ibo a spiritu tuo, aut a facie tua quo fugiam? diuersa significatio est spiritus atque faciei. et a spiritu quidem abibo, a facie autem fugiam. dehinc sequitur: si ascendero in cselum, tu illic es; si descendero in infernum, ades. non eadem est ascensio in caelum, quse et descensio in infernum. tertium deinde est: si sumpsero pinnas meas ante lucem et habitauero in postremis maris: etenim illuc manus tua deducet me, et tenebit me dextera tua. iam non hominis hsec uox est, ut pinnas sumat, ut suas sumat, ut trans oceanum habitet, ut deducatur illic manu dei, ut teneatur dextera dei: potioris istud naturae est. et quis hic sit, qui confidenter haec dicat, ipsa dictorum ratio monstrabit.
Since, then, we remember that this psalm began in the person of the man whom he assumed, we must look carefully so as to understand what must be fitted to his divinity and what to the man: and that in such a way that we apply our sense to the words rather than subject the words to our sense through the opinion of a deceptive understanding. For he says: "Where shall I go from your Spirit, or where shall I flee from your face?" The meaning of Spirit and of face is different. From the Spirit I shall go away, but from the face I shall flee. Then follows: "If I ascend into heaven, you are there; if I descend into hell, you are present." The ascent into heaven is not the same as the descent into hell. Then the third: "If I take my wings before the light and dwell in the uttermost parts of the sea, even there your hand will lead me, and your right hand will hold me." This is no longer the voice of a man: to take wings, to take his own wings, to dwell beyond the ocean, to be led there by God's hand, to be held by God's right hand: this belongs to a superior nature. And who this is who says these things confidently, the very reasoning of the words will show.
138.21CSEL 22:758–759
Ostendens igitur unigenitus deus eam, quae per se mirabilis facta est et ad quam non potest, paternse admirationis confessionem, utrumque in se tempus et naturam utramque significat, scilicet eam, qua et in spiritu et in corpore manens docuit. cum enim ait: quo ibo a spiritu tuo, tempus illud, quo et ipse spiritus in spiritu paternse gloriae ante adsumptionem hominis mansit, ostendit. non enim potest a spiritu quoquam abesse qui spiritus est: quia nec hic falli potest, nec ille deficere. at cum ait: aut a facie tua quo fugiam, adsumptse a se infirmitatis docuit aetatem: humana enim infirmitas faciei dei non patitur occursum, quia dictum Moysi est: quis est homo, qui uidebit faciem meam et uiuet? quod non sustinemus, defugimus; quia infirmitatis humanae est occursum naturae inconspicabilis fugere. et fugit quidem quantum ad inpatientiam uisionis. sed quia secundum prophetam uultus dei super facientes mala, naturae quoque humanae est, iudicium dei, quod significatur in uultu, fugere non posse. non enim tamquam peccator, qui peccati nescius est, loquebatur, ut fugeret: sed paternam infinitatem extra omnia manentem cum in spiritu ante docuisset, nunc quoque ex hominis persona, qui nusquam deum fugere posset, ostendit.
The only-begotten God, then, showing that confession of wonder at the Father which was made wonderful through him and to which he cannot attain, signifies in himself both times and both natures, namely that in which he taught remaining both in spirit and in body. For when he says, "Where shall I go from your Spirit," he shows that time in which he too, being spirit, remained in the Spirit of the Father's glory before the assumption of the man. For one who is spirit cannot be absent anywhere from the Spirit: because neither can this one be deceived nor that one fail. But when he says, "Or where shall I flee from your face," he taught the age of the weakness he assumed: for human weakness cannot bear meeting the face of God, since it was said to Moses: "Who is the man who will see my face and live?" What we cannot bear, we flee; for it belongs to human weakness to flee the meeting of an invisible nature. And he flees indeed as far as concerns the inability to bear the vision. But since, according to the prophet, the face of God is against those who do evil, it belongs also to human nature that it cannot flee the judgment of God, which is signified in the face. For he who knew no sin did not speak as a sinner, so as to flee; but having taught before in the Spirit the Father's infinity remaining beyond all things, he now shows it also from the person of a man, who could nowhere flee from God.
138.22CSEL 22:759–760
Sequitur quoque par ratio dictorum, ut utrumque ex eo, quod et homo et deus erat, dixerit. si ascendero in caelum, tu illic es: hoc diuinitatis est proprium. nemo enim ascendit in cselum, nisi qui de caelo descendit, filius hominis, qui est in caelo. terreni enim corporis natura ascensionem hanc nisi in caelestem gloriam demutata non obtinet. si descendero in infernum, ades: humanae ista lex necessitatis est, ut consepultis corporibus ad inferos animae descendant. quam descensionem dominus ad consummationem ueri hominis non recusauit. id autem: quo abibo aut quo fugiam, et illic es et ades ad significationem doctrinae eius, quse mirabilis ex eo facta est, pertinet, per quam deus omnia esse et in omnibus esse sit cognitus: ut, licet faciem dei homo fugiat, quia non sustinet, licet de supernis ad inferos mortis lege descendat, deus tamen ubique sit semper et in omnibus.
There follows also a like reasoning of the words, so that he spoke each from the fact that he was both man and God. "If I ascend into heaven, you are there": this is proper to divinity. For no one has ascended into heaven but he who descended from heaven, the Son of Man, who is in heaven. For the nature of an earthly body does not obtain this ascent unless changed into heavenly glory. "If I descend into hell, you are present": this is the law of human necessity, that when bodies are buried, souls descend to the underworld. This descent the Lord did not refuse, to complete his being a true man. But "where shall I go or where shall I flee," and "you are there" and "you are present" pertain to the meaning of his teaching, which was made wonderful from him, through which God has been known to be all things and to be in all things: so that, although man flees the face of God because he cannot bear it, although by the law of death he descends from above to the underworld, yet God is always everywhere and in all things.
138.23CSEL 22:760
Et quia per hsec superiora discretim ex utroque, in quo erat, naturae genere prsedicauit, dei scilicet atque hominis, tertio unitatem naturae iam in se proficientis ostendit dicens: si sumpsero pinnas meas ante lucem et habitauero in postremis maris: etenim illuc manus tua deducet me, et tenebit me dextera tua. cum sumpsit pinnas, iam corpore non grauatur. cum suas sumpsit, docet hanc euolandi semper sibi fuisse uirtutem. cum ante lucem sumpsit, tempus resurrectionis ostendit. cum in postremis maris est, loca ut deus humanae demorationis excedit. cum deducitur manu, non timet. cum tenetur dextera dei, non mutatur aut decidit: donauit illi deus nomen, quod est super omne nomen, ut in nomine eius omne genu flectat cselestium et terrestrium et infernorum, et omnis lingua confiteatur, quia dominus Iesus in gloria est dei patris. in eo enim, quod datur ei nomen super omne nomen, manu ac potestate patris dei in gloria ipsius homo susceptus adsumitur.
And since through these preceding verses he spoke separately from each kind of nature in which he was, that is, of God and of man, in the third he shows the unity of the nature now advancing in him, saying: "If I take my wings before the light and dwell in the uttermost parts of the sea, even there your hand will lead me, and your right hand will hold me." When he has taken wings, he is no longer weighed down by the body. When he has taken his own, he teaches that this power of flying away always belonged to him. When he has taken them before the light, he shows the time of the resurrection. When he is in the uttermost parts of the sea, as God he goes beyond the places of human dwelling. When he is led by the hand, he does not fear. When he is held by God's right hand, he is not changed nor does he fall: "God gave him the name that is above every name, that at his name every knee should bend, of things in heaven and on earth and under the earth, and every tongue confess that the Lord Jesus is in the glory of God the Father." For in that the name above every name is given him, the man taken up is assumed into the Father's glory by the hand and power of God the Father.
138.24CSEL 22:760–761
Pinnas autem ad demutationem terrenorum corporum in spiritalem atque aeternam naturam referri prophetica auctoritas est, cum ad inopem fidei et bonorum operum pauperem dicitur: ne extendas te, cum sis pauper, diuiti, sensu autem tuo abstine: praeparauit enim sibi pinnas ut aquila, et reuertetur in domum eius, qui praeest ei. pauperem extendentem se in spes diuitis arguit, quod infidelitatis suse inopiam fidelium exaequet opulentiae. diues enim non humanis opibus, sed caelestibus thesauris parat sibi pinnas, quibus reuertatur in domum eius, qui praeest ei. reuertetur enim, unde decidit, unde in peccato primi hominis expulsus est. et quis est iste, cuius haec domus est et qui ei praeest? nempe ille, qui dixit: amen dico tibi, hodie mecum eris in paradiso. meminit et alibi dicens, cum de spiritalium indefessa iam seternitate tractaret: pinnigerabunt tamquam aquilae, naturam euolandi in caelum in resurrectionis demutatione sumpturi. sed hic pinnas sumit uolaturus non alienas, non nouas, sed proprietatis usurpatione prsesumptas: quia post passionis uoluntarise sacramentum et naturae et potestatis pinnas ad caelum se habuerit efferendi.
That wings refer to the change of earthly bodies into a spiritual and eternal nature is prophetic authority, when it is said to one poor in faith and needy in good works: "Do not stretch yourself out, since you are poor, to the rich man, but refrain in your thought; for he has prepared wings for himself like an eagle, and he will return to the house of him who is over him." It rebukes the poor man who stretches himself toward the hopes of the rich, because he would make the poverty of his unbelief equal to the wealth of the faithful. For the rich man, not by human riches but by heavenly treasures, prepares wings for himself, by which he may return to the house of him who is over him. For he will return whence he fell, whence he was expelled in the sin of the first man. And who is he whose house this is and who is over him? Surely he who said: "Amen I say to you, today you will be with me in paradise." He recalls it elsewhere too, when treating of the now untiring eternity of spiritual beings: "They will take wings like eagles," being about to take the nature of flying to heaven in the change of the resurrection. But here he takes wings to fly, not another's, not new, but anticipated by the claim of his own property: because after the mystery of his voluntary passion he had wings both of nature and of power to carry himself to heaven.
138.25CSEL 22:761
Sequitur etiam idem ordo dictorum et ex utriusque naturse intellegentia, hominis scilicet et dei, sermo decurrit. ait enim: et dixi: forsitan tenebrse conculcabunt me. uox ista hominis esse existimatur; quia uidetur quibusdam aut inreligiosis aut inperitis sub illa passionis timiditate trepidare: quasi uero nunc sermo iste timoris alicuius habeat professionem et non magis susceptae mortis significauerit uoluntatem nullo eius metu ac terrore praelato. non enim ait: tenebrae conculcabunt me; sed ait: forsitan tenebrae conculcabunt me. quod fortuitu adiecit, incertum humanae de se opinionis, qua timere inferos creditus est, inrisit errorem. nemo enim conculcari se certus idem rursum, an conculcetur, incertus est.
The same order of words follows, and the speech runs on from the understanding of both natures, of man and of God. For he says: "And I said: Perhaps darkness will trample me." This voice is thought to be the man's, because to some, either irreligious or unskilled, he seems to tremble in that timidity of the passion: as if now this speech contained a profession of some fear, and did not rather signify the will to undergo death, no fear or terror of it being shown. For he does not say, "Darkness will trample me," but, "Perhaps darkness will trample me." In adding "perhaps," he mocked the uncertain error of human opinion about him, by which he was believed to fear the underworld. For no one who is certain he will be trampled is at the same time uncertain whether he will be trampled.
138.26CSEL 22:761–763
Ut autem hoc, quod ait: forsitan tenebrse conculcabunt me, non ad naturae suae trepidationem posset intellegi, sed inpise de se intellegentise significaret incertum, continuo subiecit: et nox inluminatio in deliciis meis. quomodo enim conculcatur a tenebris, cui mors inluminatio in deliciis sit futura? domino itaque passio ista deliciase sunt, dum portas aereas confringit, dum uectes ferreos conterit, dum omnem potestatem despoliat, dum de his in se triumphat, dum eum, quem ad imaginem suam fecerat, redimit, dum deliciis paradisi restituit. in his igitur passionis oblectamentis atque deliciis nox ei inluminatio est et inluminatio ob id, quia tenebrae non obscurabuntur a te. per naturae unitatem atque indemutabilem diuinitatis similitudinem in filio pater est; et operibus ipsis testantibus, quod in eo pater sit, confidenter ait: non obscurabuntur a te, quia ex persona patris dictum in psalmis meminerimus: cum ipso sum in tribulatione. et ipse dominus in euangeliis, cum de apostolorum trepidatione loqueretur, ait: ecce uenit hora, ut dispargatur unusquisque uestrum et me solum relinquatis: sed non sum solus, quoniam pater mecum est. siue uirtute, qua similia patri potest, siue naturae genere et diuinitate, qua ex deo deus natus est, pater secum est. confidenter ergo ait: quia tenebrae non obscurabuntur a te. non enim sentit uirtus indemutabilis tenebras, et infernam noctem lux uera non patitur. sequitur enim: et nox sicut dies inluminabitur; sicut tenebrae eius, ita et lumen eius. hoc totum ad id refertur, quod dictum est a te: tenebrse non obscurabuntur a te et nox sicut dies inluminabitur et sicut tenebrse eius, ita et lumen eius. "a te" semel dictum refertur ad plurima. ideo autem in deliciis nox est, quia sicut dies inluminabitur. inluminabitur autem ob id, quia ut tenebrae, ita et lumen a deo sit, potente tenebrarum conditore condere lumen in tenebris. et audiamus istud euangelistam docentem ita: et lux lucet in tenebris, et tenebrae eam non conprehenderunt: illo potente, ut lux sit in tenebris, tenebris non potentibus obscuritatis suse nocte lumen indefessi luminis conprehendere.
So that what he said, "Perhaps darkness will trample me," might not be understood of a trembling of his nature, but might signify the uncertainty of an impious understanding about him, he at once added: "And night is illumination in my delights." For how is he trampled by darkness for whom death will be illumination in delights? To the Lord, then, this passion is delights, as he breaks the gates of bronze, shatters the iron bars, despoils every power, triumphs over them in himself, redeems him whom he had made in his image, and restores him to the delights of paradise. In these pleasures and delights of the passion, then, night is illumination to him, and illumination for this reason, "because darkness will not be darkened by you." Through unity of nature and the unchangeable likeness of divinity, the Father is in the Son; and, the works themselves testifying that the Father is in him, he says confidently, "It will not be darkened by you," for we remember it said in the psalms in the person of the Father: "I am with him in tribulation." And the Lord himself in the Gospels, speaking of the apostles' fear, says: "Behold, the hour comes when each of you will be scattered and you will leave me alone; but I am not alone, for the Father is with me." Whether by the power by which he can do the like of the Father, or by the kind of nature and divinity by which he was born God from God, the Father is with him. He says confidently, then: "For darkness will not be darkened by you." For unchangeable power does not feel darkness, and the true light does not suffer the night of the underworld. For there follows: "And night will be lit up as the day; as its darkness, so also its light." All this refers to what was said, "by you": darkness will not be darkened by you, and night will be lit up as the day, and as its darkness, so also its light. "By you," said once, refers to several things. Night is in delights for this reason, because it will be lit up as the day. And it will be lit up for this reason, that, as darkness, so also light is from God, since the maker of darkness is able to make light in darkness. And let us hear the evangelist teaching this thus: "And the light shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not comprehend it": he being able to make light be in darkness, the darkness being unable, by the night of its obscurity, to comprehend the light of unfailing light.
138.27CSEL 22:763–764
Sequitur deinde: quia tu, domine, possedisti renes meos. suscepisti me de utero matris mese. confitebor tibi, quia terribiliter mirificatus sum. tenet etiam nunc ordinem significationis utriusque, ut se et hominem et deum doceat. cum enim possidentur a deo renes eius et a matris utero suscipitur, corporalis in eo condicio monstratur. in renibus enim uoluptatis est causa. sed cuius renes a deo possidentur, non exeunt in uoluptates corporis incentiua lasciuise. et qui ab utero matris suscipitur, non ad opera saeculi a deo susceptus excedit. omnis igitur eius uoluntas ac labor est patrem praedicare, uoluntatem patris explere, acceptum a patre calicem bibere. haec enim hominis sui, quem adsumpsit, officia sunt. sed cum ait: confitebor tibi, quia terribiliter mirificatus sum, confessionem omnem terribilis de se admirationis ad gloriam diuinae substantiae suse reddit. mirificatus est enim ob id, quia deus possedit renes eius, quia a matris utero susceptus est. per id enim, quod uoluntas eius et operatio deo dedita fuit, mirificari terribiliter promeruit. mirificatus autem terribiliter est, dum horis crucis tenebrae sunt, dum tremit terra, dum saxa rumpuntur, dum patent sepulchra, dum mortui resurgunt, dum in eodem corpore ipse conspicitur, dum clausis ianuis soli sibi penetrabili aditu adsistit, dum ad caelos eleuatur, dum apostoli gentium linguis locuntur, dum umbrae eorum morbis medentur, dum claudis nummum poscentibus cursus donatur, dum eleemosynis inopum mortuus redditur, dum persecutores fiunt prsedicatores, dum dissolutis catenis cantatur in carcere, dum in martyrio martyri uidetur in caelis, dum postremo in eo, quo eleuatus est, corpore a dextris dei sedet, cuius in gloria et maiestate permanet.
Then follows: "For you, O Lord, have possessed my reins; you took me up from my mother's womb. I will confess to you, for I have been made terribly wonderful." Even now he keeps the order of both meanings, so as to teach that he is both man and God. For when his reins are possessed by God and he is taken up from his mother's womb, a bodily condition is shown in him. For in the reins is the cause of pleasure. But he whose reins are possessed by God does not go out into the pleasures of the body by the incitements of wantonness. And he who is taken up from his mother's womb, taken up by God, does not go out into the works of the world. All his will and labor, then, is to proclaim the Father, to fulfil the Father's will, to drink the cup received from the Father. For these are the duties of his man whom he assumed. But when he says, "I will confess to you, for I have been made terribly wonderful," he renders the whole confession of terrible wonder at himself to the glory of his divine substance. For he was made wonderful because God possessed his reins, because he was taken up from his mother's womb. For through the fact that his will and work were devoted to God, he deserved to be made terribly wonderful. And he was made terribly wonderful when in the hours of the cross there was darkness, when the earth trembled, when the rocks split, when the tombs opened, when the dead rose, when he himself was seen in the same body, when, the doors being shut, he stood among them by an entrance passable only to himself, when he was raised to the heavens, when the apostles spoke in the languages of the nations, when their shadows healed diseases, when running was given to the lame who asked for money, when a dead woman was restored by the alms of the poor, when persecutors became preachers, when, chains loosed, there was singing in prison, when in martyrdom he was seen by a martyr in the heavens, when finally in the body in which he was raised he sits at the right hand of God, in whose glory and majesty he remains.
138.28CSEL 22:764
Omnem autem eam, qua terribiliter mirificatus est, dignitatem ad opus eius refert, cuius et paruit uoluntati, dicens: mira opera tua, et anima mea nouit ualde. quod, inquit, terribiliter mirificatus sum, opus tuum est. eadem autem et in euangeliis ratio seruata est, ut cum ad demonstrationem uirtutis suse dixerit: quaecumque pater facit, eadem et filius facit similiter et rursum: sicut pater uiuificat mortuos, sic et filius quos uult uiuificat, tamen dignitatem operum omnium patri deferens, cum dicat: non potest ab se filius facere quicquam nisi quod uiderit patrem facientem. contestatam de se potestatem per reuerentiae honorem ei, cui omnia meminerat confitenda, subiecit, non sibi adimens, quod similia patri posset, sed eum, per quem similia posset, ostendens. haec igitur, quibus terribiliter mirificatus est, licet, quia potuit, uirtutis suse fuerint, tamen patris operibus uniuersa ea detulit dicens: mira opera tua, et anima mea nouit ualde. humanae infirmitatis uox ista non est, ut mira opera dei ualde nosse se iactet. soli hoc conpetit, qui ait: nemo nouit patrem nisi filius. nouit enim non utcumque, non leuiter: nouit autem ualde per eam fiduciam, qua dicit: pater in me, et ego in patre. in eo enim, quod ait ualde, perfectam scientiam intimae cognitionis ostendit.
All that dignity in which he was made terribly wonderful he refers to the work of him whose will he obeyed, saying: "Wonderful are your works, and my soul knows it well." "That I have been made terribly wonderful," he says, "is your work." The same reasoning has been kept in the Gospels too: though he said, to show his power, "Whatever the Father does, the Son also does likewise," and again, "As the Father gives life to the dead, so the Son also gives life to whom he will," yet he gives the dignity of all the works to the Father, saying: "The Son can do nothing of himself except what he sees the Father doing." He subjected the power he had testified of himself, through the honor of reverence, to him to whom he remembered all things were to be confessed, not taking from himself that he could do the like of the Father, but showing him through whom he could do the like. These things, then, by which he was made terribly wonderful, although they belonged to his own power, since he was able, yet he ascribed them all to the Father's works, saying: "Wonderful are your works, and my soul knows it well." This is not the voice of human weakness, to boast that it knows God's wonderful works well. It belongs only to him who says: "No one knows the Father except the Son." For he knows not in any way whatever, not lightly; he knows well, by that confidence with which he says, "The Father is in me and I in the Father." For in saying "well" he shows the perfect knowledge of intimate understanding.
138.29CSEL 22:764–765
Et quia omnia mira opera dei ualde anima ipsius nouit, eruditionem doctrinae in nos suse memorat, qua nobis paternae operationis iam non sint occulta mysteria, dicens: non est occultatum os meum a te, quse fecisti in occulto. os Christi ecclesiam esse et prophetica et apostolica auctoritas est. nam cum secundum ea, quse in Genesi dicta sunt, de Adam atque Eua apostolus tractaret, ita ait: hoc nunc os de ossibus meis et caro de carne mea, ad expositionem dicti huius adiecit dicens: hoc mysterium magnum est. ego autem dico in Christo et in ecclesia. quod autem per misericordiam dei patris ecclesiae hsec occulta non fuerint, ipse dominus in euangelio testatus est, cum ait: confiteor tibi, domine pater caeli et terrae, quia abscondisti hsec a sapientibus et prudentibus et reuelasti ea paruulis: ita pater, quia sic fuit placitum ante te. ab eo igitur nobis non occultantur, quse facta sunt in occulto. nobis quidem non occultata sunt, sed saeculi huius prudentibus facta sunt in occulto.
And since his soul knows well all the wonderful works of God, he recalls the instruction of his teaching toward us, by which the mysteries of the Father's working are no longer hidden from us, saying: "My bone was not hidden from you, which you made in secret." That the bone of Christ is the church is both prophetic and apostolic authority. For when the apostle was treating of Adam and Eve according to what is said in Genesis, "This now is bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh," he added to explain this saying: "This mystery is great; but I speak of Christ and the church." And that by the mercy of God the Father these hidden things were not hidden from the church, the Lord himself testified in the Gospel, when he says: "I confess to you, Lord, Father of heaven and earth, that you have hidden these things from the wise and prudent and revealed them to little ones; yes, Father, for so it was pleasing before you." By him, then, what was done in secret is not hidden from us. From us indeed they were not hidden, but for the prudent of this world they were done in secret.
138.30CSEL 22:765–766
Quod autem omnia ecclesiasticse spei sacramenta in occulto fuerint, testatur et apostolus dicens: prout potestis intellegere intellectum meum in sacramento Christi, quod aliis temporibus non est cognitum filiis hominum, sicut nunc reuelatum est sanctis eius apostolis et prophetis in spiritu esse gentes coheredes et concorporales et conparticipes pollicitationis eius in Christo. et iterum: secundum dispensationem dei, quse data est mihi ad uos ad inplendum uerbum dei, sacramentum, quod absconditum fuit ante saecula et a generationibus, nunc manifestum est sanctis eius, quibus uoluit ostendere diuitias glorise sacramenti dei inter gentes, quod est Christus in uobis spes gloriae. occultum itaque mysterium fuit, quod reuelatum est, esse deo gentes coheredes et concorporales et conparticipes pollicitationis eius in Christo. occultum etiam mysterium est, quibus uoluit ostendere diuitias gloriae sacramenti dei inter gentes, quod est Christus in uobis spes gloriae.
That all the mysteries of the church's hope were in secret, the apostle too testifies, saying: "As you are able to understand my insight into the mystery of Christ, which in other times was not made known to the sons of men as it has now been revealed to his holy apostles and prophets in the Spirit: that the Gentiles are fellow heirs and fellow members of the body and fellow partakers of his promise in Christ." And again: "according to the dispensation of God which was given to me for you, to fulfil the word of God, the mystery which was hidden from the ages and from generations, but now has been made manifest to his saints, to whom he willed to show the riches of the glory of the mystery of God among the Gentiles, which is Christ in you, the hope of glory." The mystery, then, was hidden which has been revealed: that the Gentiles are fellow heirs to God and fellow members and fellow partakers of his promise in Christ. Hidden too is the mystery, to those to whom he willed to show the riches of the glory of the mystery of God among the Gentiles, which is Christ in you, the hope of glory.
138.31CSEL 22:766
Occultum igitur hoc mysterium fuit, quod esset Christus in nobis: hoc pater reuelauit. Petro enim dictum est: non caro, non sanguis reuelauit tibi, sed pater meus, qui in cselis est. reuelatum autem est Christum esse in nobis, in pauperibus spiritu, in tribulatis corde, in humilibus terrae, in purgamentis mundi, in ecclesiae infimis. infimum enim ecclesiae id est omni humilitate submissum. hoc ergo occultum mysterium reuelatum est, quod est Christus in nobis. non per apostolum hsec tantum dominus, sed etiam in hoc eodem psalmo ita loquitur dicens: non est occultatum os meum a te, quae fecisti in occulto: et substantia mea in inferioribus terrae. non in inferno, sicut superius, cum de passione tractabat, sed in inferioribus terrae, cum de reuelatis a patre, quae in occulto fuerant, praedicabat. occultum autem fuerat, quod est Christus in uobis, id est substantia mea in inferioribus terrae, in inferioribus scilicet omnium humilitatis officiis.
This mystery, then, was hidden, that Christ is in us: this the Father revealed. For it was said to Peter: "Flesh and blood has not revealed it to you, but my Father who is in heaven." And it has been revealed that Christ is in us: in the poor in spirit, in the troubled of heart, in the lowly of the earth, in the refuse of the world, in the lowest of the church. For the lowest of the church is that which is subdued in all humility. This hidden mystery, then, has been revealed, which is Christ in us. Not only through the apostle does the Lord say these things, but also in this same psalm he speaks thus: "My bone was not hidden from you, which you made in secret, and my substance in the lower parts of the earth." Not "in hell," as above, when he was treating of the passion, but "in the lower parts of the earth," when he was proclaiming what had been hidden and was revealed by the Father. What had been hidden was that Christ is in you, that is, "my substance in the lower parts of the earth," namely in the lowest offices of all humility.
138.32CSEL 22:766–767
Procedit deinde secundum profectum euangelicum sermo psalmi, cum ait: inperfectum tuum uiderunt oculi mei, et in libro tuo omnes scribentur: die replebuntur, et nemo in eis. atque ut omnia secundum doctrinam caelestem intellegere possimus, id, quod difficultatem adfert, absoluendum est. quod enim latini translatores inperfectum interpretati sunt, id in graecis libris ἀκατέργαστον scribitur: nec querimur de translatoribus; uereor enim, ne non aliter significari ab his potuerit. id autem, quod graece est ἀκατέργαστον, significat id, quod sine operatione maneat: ut sit id ipsum, cum factum tamen non sit. inperfectum autem nobiscum id demonstrat, quod coeptum nec consummatum est. sed si interius uerbi huius uirtutem pertractemus, potest non sane a grsecitatis proprietate esse diuersum. deo autem soli proprium potest esse, ut sit et infectus sit: quia quod est, non habet necessitatem ut fiat; quod autem fit, non est, antequam fiat. sed qui aeternus est, manet neque factus est. hoc ergo inperfectum et, ut ad intellegentise profectum dicere audeamus, inoperatum dei oculi eius uiderunt.
Then the speech of the psalm proceeds according to the advance of the Gospel, when it says: "Your unperfected one my eyes have seen, and in your book all will be written: by day they will be filled, and no one in them." And so that we may understand everything according to heavenly teaching, what brings difficulty must be resolved. What the Latin translators rendered "unperfected" is written in the Greek books as ἀκατέργαστον. Nor do we complain of the translators; for I fear it could not have been expressed otherwise by them. But the Greek ἀκατέργαστον means what remains without working: so that it is the thing itself, though it has not been made. But "unperfected" with us shows what has been begun and not completed. But if we handle the force of this word more inwardly, it may indeed not differ from the proper sense of the Greek. And it can be proper to God alone that he both is and is unmade: because what is has no need to be made; but what is made does not exist before it is made. But he who is eternal remains and was not made. This "unperfected," then, and, if we may dare to say it for the advance of understanding, this "unwrought" of God his eyes have seen.
138.33CSEL 22:767
Inperfectum enim tuum uiderunt oculi mei. sed qui tandem oculi? numquid spiritales illi, quibus deum patrem solus unigenitus uidet? sed isti non egent his, quse secuntur: et in libro, inquit, tuo omnes scribentur: die replebuntur, et nemo in his. profectum indemutabilis illa unigeniti dei natura non expetit. et qui tandem ei erit profectus, ut omnes oculi eius in libro scribantur, ut die repleantur, ut in his nemo sit? hoc totum contumeliosum et inpudens est opinari.
"For your unperfected one my eyes have seen." But which eyes, pray? Surely not those spiritual eyes with which the Only-begotten alone sees God the Father? But these have no need of what follows: "and in your book," it says, "all will be written: by day they will be filled, and no one in them." That unchangeable nature of the only-begotten God does not seek advancement. And what advancement will there be for him, that all his eyes should be written in a book, be filled by day, have no one in them? It is insulting and shameless to think all this.
138.34CSEL 22:767–768
Sed quemadmodum ossi eius, in quo ecclesiae corpus ostenditur, quae occulta erant, non occulta sunt, ita et oculi eius hoc, quod inperfectum dei est, uiderunt. os autem ad ecclesiam referri, quae corpus est Christi, superius admonuimus. in corpore uero oculos principalis esse officii ac uirtutis nemini dubium est. et quia oculi potiores ceteris membris sunt, in his apostolos significari non ambigendum est, per quos lumen ecclesiae atque operationum diuina mysteria praebentur. quod dominus manifeste in euangeliis ostendit. namque cum apostolos sal terrse, lumen mundi et lucernam domus in candelabro ob egregia et conspicabilia — ad conparationis exemplum — fidei suae opera nuncupasset, rursum uocans eos a terrenis et corruptibilibus thesauris et a saeculi lucris esse oculos corporis a dixit ita: lucerna corporis tui est oculus tuus. oculus tuus simplex est, totum corpus tuum erit lucidum: si autem oculus tuus nequam est, totum corpus tuum tenebrosum erit. si ergo lumen, quod in te est, tenebrae sunt, ipsse tenebrae quantae sunt? extra corporalem intellegentiam locus iste est; et idcirco spiritaliter intellegendus est. apostoli itaque, qui ecclesise, id est Christi corporis oculi sunt, lucidi et simplices iubentur esse corpore toto lucido his simplicibus mansuro, si autem nequam fuerint, toto corpore necessario tenebroso futuro: nulla scilicet tenebris spe luminis residua, si lumen ipsum in tenebris sit quo ingenti periculo sacerdotes, qui ecclesiae oculi sunt, negotiis saeculi, curis pecuniae et familiarium rerum incrementis et conuiuiorum luxibus occupantur. ecclesiae enim lumen sunt, id est corporis oculi. et si lumen ipsum auaritise et lasciuise nocte tenebrescat, corpori id est ecclesiae, cui per naturam suam tenebrae sunt, quantae insuper tenebrae de exemplo tenebrosi luminis inuehentur? hi ergo oculi eius inperfectum dei uiderunt. inperfectum autem dei diximus, quod factum non sit et maneat: in quo seternitas infectae diuinitatis ostenditur.
But as to his bone, in which the body of the church is shown, the hidden things are not hidden, so too his eyes have seen what is the unperfected of God. We pointed out above that the bone refers to the church, which is the body of Christ. And no one doubts that in the body the eyes have the principal function and power. And since the eyes are superior to the other members, we must not doubt that the apostles are signified in them, through whom the light of the church and the divine mysteries of its workings are offered. This the Lord plainly showed in the Gospels. For when he had called the apostles the salt of the earth, the light of the world, and the lamp of the house on a lampstand, because of the excellent and visible works of their faith (as an example of comparison), again calling them away from earthly and corruptible treasures and the gains of the world, he said that they are the eyes of the body, thus: "The lamp of your body is your eye. If your eye is single, your whole body will be full of light; but if your eye is evil, your whole body will be dark. If, then, the light that is in you is darkness, how great is the darkness itself!" This passage is beyond bodily understanding; and therefore it is to be understood spiritually. The apostles, then, who are the eyes of the church, that is, of the body of Christ, are commanded to be bright and single, the whole body remaining bright while these are single, but if they are evil, the whole body necessarily becoming dark: no hope of light being left to the darkness if the light itself is in darkness. In what enormous danger, then, are priests, who are the eyes of the church, when they are occupied with the business of the world, cares for money, the increase of household property, and the luxuries of banquets! For they are the light of the church, that is, the eyes of the body. And if the light itself grows dark in the night of avarice and wantonness, how much more darkness will be brought upon the body, that is, the church, which by its nature is darkness, from the example of a darkened light? These eyes of his, then, have seen the unperfected of God. And we said that the unperfected of God is what has not been made and remains: in which the eternity of unmade divinity is shown.
138.35CSEL 22:768–769
Sed audax forte est, ut ininitiabilem illam dei patris seternitatem uisam ab apostolis adseramus, maxime cum dictum sit: deum nemo uidit umquam nisi unigenitus filius, qui est in sinu patris. sed nihil nostrum dicimus, nihil audax praedicamus; dicat ille, qui dixit: qui me uidet, uidet et patrem, non ipsum se patrem esse significans. non enim roganti Philippo, ut sibi patrem ostenderet, respondit: ego pater sum, sed ait: qui me uidet, uidet et patrem. per indifferentis naturae uirtutem eum, de quo quaerebatur, patrem conspici et in se esse respondit; et id adhuc absolutius subiecit: quomodo tu dicis: ostende nobis patrem? non credis mihi, quoniam ego in patre et pater in me est? uerba, quse ego loquor uobis, non a me loquor; sed pater, qui in me manet, ipse facit opera sua. credite mihi, quoniam ego in patre et pater in me. sin autem, uel propter opera credite. arguit non intellegentem et adhuc de patre quaerentem et per operum efficientiam uirtutem patris in unigenito non contuentem. manet enim in eo pater. est namque genitus ex eo. non est in eo nouse creationis aliena natura. uirtute filius est, diuinitate filius est, substantia filius est, generatione filius est. opera testantur, potestates locuntur, per naturae progeniem in filio patrem esse et per legitimae originis substantiam filium in patre esse. non dissentit haec ab ingenito nata generositas: unum ambo sunt. pater uidetur in filio et uidetur non per inuisibilis nobis naturae contemplationem, sed per operum admirationem. filii enim opera opera patris sunt, non inbecillo ad efficienda ea filio neque diuerso uirtute naturse: sed id filio efficiente, quidquid is, a quo ipse est genitus, efficiat. atque ideo per id, quod in maiestate operum filius contemplabilis est, pater quoque uidetur in filio.
But perhaps it is bold to assert that that beginningless eternity of God the Father was seen by the apostles, especially since it is said: "No one has ever seen God except the only-begotten Son, who is in the bosom of the Father." But we say nothing of our own, we proclaim nothing bold; let him say it who said: "He who sees me sees the Father also," not signifying that he himself is the Father. For to Philip, who asked him to show him the Father, he did not answer, "I am the Father," but said, "He who sees me sees the Father also." Through the power of an undifferentiated nature he answered that he about whom the question was, the Father, is seen and is in him; and he added this still more completely: "How do you say: Show us the Father? Do you not believe me that I am in the Father and the Father is in me? The words that I speak to you I do not speak of myself; but the Father who abides in me, he does his works. Believe me that I am in the Father and the Father in me; or else believe for the sake of the works." He rebukes one who did not understand, still asked about the Father, and did not behold the power of the Father in the Only-begotten through the effecting of the works. For the Father abides in him, since he was begotten from him. In him there is not the foreign nature of a new creation. He is Son in power, Son in divinity, Son in substance, Son in generation. The works testify, the powers speak, that through the offspring of nature the Father is in the Son and through the substance of a lawful origin the Son is in the Father. This nobility born from the unbegotten does not differ from him: both are one. The Father is seen in the Son, and seen not through contemplation of a nature invisible to us, but through wonder at the works. For the works of the Son are the works of the Father, the Son being neither weak for accomplishing them nor different in power of nature, but the Son accomplishing whatever he from whom he was begotten accomplishes. And therefore, since the Son can be contemplated in the majesty of the works, the Father too is seen in the Son.
138.36CSEL 22:769–770
His ergo oculis, qui seternitatem in filio paternse uirtutis contuentur, id est apostolis id precatur, ut in dei libro scribantur, maneant scilicet in memoriam aeternam, pro quibus tali prece in euangeliis orauit: pater, manifestaui nomen tuum hominibus, quos dedisti mihi de sseculo; tui erant, et mihi eos dedisti, et uerbum tuum seruauerunt. nunc cognouerunt, quoniam omnia, quae dedisti mihi, dedi eis, et ipsi acceperunt et scierunt uere, quoniam a te prodii, et crediderunt, quia tu me misisti. ego pro his rogo; non pro saeculo rogo, sed pro his, quos dedisti mihi. pro his ergo orat, ut in libro dei scribantur. et si qui forte ambigent, cur non in libro uiuentium scripti sint, mihi maioris dignitatis uidetur esse in libro dei scribi; quia peccatores de libro uiuentium delentur, iusti autem in libro dei scribuntur. quod utrumque sub his dictis significatur: deleantur de libro uiuentium et cum iustis non scribantur. pro resurrectionis enim diuersitate, qua stella ab stella differt in gloria, plures in libro uiuentium erunt. iusti autem in libro dei scribentur, quia peccatores non modo cum iustis non scribentur, sed ne in libro quidem uiuentium derelinquentur.
For these eyes, then, which behold the eternity of the Father's power in the Son, that is, for the apostles, he prays that they may be written in God's book, that is, remain in eternal memory; for them he prayed in the Gospels with such a prayer: "Father, I have manifested your name to the men whom you gave me out of the world; they were yours, and you gave them to me, and they have kept your word. Now they have known that all that you gave me I have given them, and they have received and known truly that I came forth from you, and they have believed that you sent me. I pray for them; I do not pray for the world, but for those whom you have given me." He prays for them, then, that they may be written in God's book. And if anyone perhaps doubts why they are not written in the book of the living, it seems to me of greater dignity to be written in the book of God; because sinners are blotted out of the book of the living, but the righteous are written in the book of God. Both are signified under these words: "Let them be blotted out of the book of the living and not be written with the righteous." For according to the diversity of the resurrection, in which star differs from star in glory, many will be in the book of the living. But the righteous will be written in the book of God, because sinners will not only not be written with the righteous, but will not even be left in the book of the living.
138.37CSEL 22:770–771
Sed contuendum est, qui profectus eorum sit, qui in libro dei scribentur. nempe iste: die replebuntur et nemo in his. in quibusdam codicibus ita legimus: die formabuntur. nec multum differt repleri et formari. formamur enim, ut conformes simus gloriae corporis dei. et apostoli dictum est: filioli mei, quos iterum parturio, donec formetur Christus in uobis. replemur autem secundum dictum prophetse: replebimur ab ubertate domus tuae. die itaque replebuntur, id est uero lumine — lux enim Christus est: erat enim lux uera, quse lucificat omnem hominem uenientem in hunc mundum — non iam ignorantiae nocte detenti neque tenebris huius saeculi caeci, sed ueritatis luce inluminati et die repleti. quod autem repletum est, nihil praeter id, ex quo plenum est, recipit. nox enim in eum, qui die repletus est, non penetrat secundum illud apostoli: quae enim participatio luci ad tenebras? neque sedem spiritus Christi adit spiritus mundi, ut scriptum est: uos enim non spiritum huius mundi accepistis, sed spiritum, qui a deo est. neque qui mundo mortuus est, uiuit sibi, ut apostolus docet: uiuo enim iam non ego, uiuit autem in me Christus. qui die repletus est, diem tantum in se habet et ideo ait: die replebuntur, et nemo in his. nemo in his erit praeter diem, quo repleti sunt: non pecuniae aestus, non uoluptatum stimulus, non ambitionis ardor, non odiorum malignitas, non inuidise aculeus, non conuiciorum furor, non superbise amentia, non cetera quse diaboli sunt arma atque uirtutes, sed lux uera, sed dies sola, qua repleti sunt; ceterarum quoque iam rerum effecti sunt incapaces. et dignum plane hi, qui sola die pleni sunt, testimonium sumunt.
But we must consider what the advancement is of those who will be written in God's book. Surely this: "By day they will be filled, and no one in them." In some manuscripts we read thus: "By day they will be formed." To be filled and to be formed do not differ much. For we are formed so as to be conformed to the glory of God's body. And the apostle's saying is: "My little children, with whom I am again in labor until Christ is formed in you." And we are filled according to the prophet's saying: "We shall be filled with the richness of your house." By day, then, they will be filled, that is, with the true light (for Christ is light: for he was the true light that enlightens every man coming into this world), no longer held by the night of ignorance nor blind in the darkness of this world, but enlightened by the light of truth and filled with day. And what is full receives nothing besides that with which it is full. For night does not penetrate one who is filled with day, according to that saying of the apostle: "For what fellowship has light with darkness?" Nor does the spirit of the world approach the seat of the Spirit of Christ, as it is written: "For you have received not the spirit of this world, but the Spirit who is from God." Nor does he who is dead to the world live to himself, as the apostle teaches: "For I live, yet no longer I, but Christ lives in me." He who is filled with day has only day in himself; and therefore it says: "By day they will be filled, and no one in them." No one will be in them besides the day with which they are filled: not the heat of money, not the goad of pleasures, not the fire of ambition, not the malice of hatreds, not the sting of envy, not the fury of insults, not the madness of pride, not the other weapons and powers of the devil, but the true light, the day alone, with which they are filled; and they have become incapable of other things. And rightly do these, who are full of day alone, receive testimony.
138.38CSEL 22:771–772
Sequitur enim: mihi autem nimis honorificati sunt amici tui, deus, nimis confortati sunt principatus eorum. dinumerabo eos, et super harenam multiplicabuntur. quid cum his dictis homini commune, ut eos, qui super harenam multiplicabuntur, dinumeret? ei tantum istud conpetit, cui sine recensione et calculo innumerabilis numeri cognitio est. amici autem eius nimis honorificati sunt; nimis quod dicitur, non secundum latinitatis consuetudinem intellegendum est. nimis enim nobiscum id significari solet, quod necessarium modum inutiliter excedat, sed Graeci id, quod nostri nimis transtulerunt, σφόδρα interpretati sunt: in quo magis ualde quam nimis continetur. ualde ergo honorificati amici eius sunt. et amicum quidem Abraham deo fuisse cognoscimus. amicum et Moysen deo lex esse locuta est. euangelia uero plures iam deo amicos esse significant domino dicente: iam non dico uos seruos, quia seruus nescit, quid uelit dominus eius: sed uos dico amicos, quoniam perstitistis mecum in omnibus temptationibus. hos igitur, quos nunc amicos nuncupat, ut superius ostendimus, et a patre sibi datos et patris esse confessus est; et secundum id, quod ait: et mea omnia tua sunt, et tua mea, amicos patris esse eos dicit. non solum autem ipsi honorificati sunt, sed etiam principatus eorum confortati sunt. ipsi quidem honorificantur, cum amici sunt, cum die pleni sunt, cum in his nemo est. sed principatus eorum confortantur, ecclesiae scilicet ab his coeptse, ab his principia sumentes: quse super petram toto orbe fundatse fortibus principiis constiterunt.
For there follows: "But to me your friends, O God, are exceedingly honored; their principalities are exceedingly strengthened. I will count them, and they will be multiplied above the sand." What has a man in common with these words, that he should count those who will be multiplied above the sand? This belongs only to him who has knowledge of a numberless number without reckoning and calculation. His friends are exceedingly honored; "exceedingly" (nimis) is not to be understood according to Latin custom. For with us nimis usually signifies what exceeds the necessary measure uselessly; but what our translators rendered nimis the Greeks expressed as σφόδρα, in which "very much" rather than "too much" is contained. His friends, then, are very much honored. And we know that Abraham was a friend to God. The law said that Moses too was a friend to God. But the Gospels signify that there are now many friends to God, the Lord saying: "I no longer call you servants, because the servant does not know what his master wills; but I call you friends, because you have continued with me in all my temptations." These, then, whom he now calls friends, he confessed, as we showed above, were both given to him by the Father and are the Father's; and according to his saying, "And all mine are yours, and yours mine," he says they are friends of the Father. And not only are they themselves honored, but their principalities too are strengthened. They themselves are honored when they are friends, when they are full of day, when no one is in them. But their principalities are strengthened: the churches, namely, begun by them, taking their beginnings from them, which, founded on the rock throughout the world, have stood firm on strong beginnings.
138.39CSEL 22:772–773
Et ut ad ecclesiae populos referri istud necessario intellegeretur, adiecit: dinumerabo eos, et super harenam multiplicabuntur. numquid numerus eorum incertus est qui in libro dei scribuntur? ergo nulla est difficultas in numero, quorum ueritas maneat in scripto. sed aliqui quod dictum est: super harenam multiplicabuntur, non ad homines tantum referendum existimauerunt, quia Abrahse dictum esset: et erit semen tuum sicut harena maris, ut, quia Abrahse semen sicut harena maris est, ad id, quod super harenam multiplicantur, amicis dei multitudo angelicse numerositatis accedat. non enim aliter sibi conuenire sicut harena maris et super harenam maris putauerunt, nisi hominum multitudini connumeraretur copia angelorum. sed nos uniuscuiusque sensui non contraimus; quid autem secundum donum spiritalis gratiae senserimus, sine cuiusquam contumelia tractabimus.
And so that this might necessarily be understood to refer to the peoples of the church, he added: "I will count them, and they will be multiplied above the sand." Is the number of those written in God's book uncertain? There is no difficulty, then, in the number of those whose truth remains in writing. But some have thought that what is said, "they will be multiplied above the sand," is not to be referred to men only, because it was said to Abraham, "And your seed will be as the sand of the sea," so that, since Abraham's seed is as the sand of the sea, to make it "above the sand" the multitude of the angelic host is added to the friends of God. For they thought "as the sand of the sea" and "above the sand of the sea" could not otherwise agree unless the abundance of angels were counted with the multitude of men. But we do not contradict anyone's sense; but what we perceive according to the gift of spiritual grace we shall treat without insult to anyone.
138.40CSEL 22:773
Promissiones duas Abrahse fuisse in Genesi accipimus. unam ante Ismael generationem deo dicente: quoniam omnem terram, quam tu uides, tibi dabo eam et semini tuo in aeternum et faciam semen tuum tamquam harenam maris. si potest quis enumerare harenam maris, ita et semen tuum dinumerabitur, nato uero Isaac et in holocaustum, quantum ad Abraham spectat, oblato hsec sequens repromissio fuit: nisi benedicens benedicam tibi et multiplicans multiplicabo semen tuum sicut stellas cseli et sicut harenam, quse est ad oram maris. et si secundum apostolum haec duo testamenta sunt, unum secundum Ismael in seruitutem generans, aliud secundum Isaac in libertatem matris nostrae Hierusalem, quae in caelis est, educens, duum necesse est seminum in stellis et in harenis numerositas praedicetur. ergo amici dei super harenam maris dinumerantur. quis enim ambiget, secundum ecclesiam toto in orbe numerosam multitudinem gentis Iudsese copia in Christo credentium prseueniri? atque ideo super harenam multiplicabuntur, quia copiosiores his erunt, qui ex legis impio populo terreni et aridi significantur in harenis.
We find in Genesis that there were two promises to Abraham. One before the begetting of Ishmael, God saying: "For all the land which you see I will give to you and to your seed for ever, and I will make your seed like the sand of the sea. If anyone can count the sand of the sea, so your seed also will be counted." But when Isaac was born and, so far as Abraham was concerned, offered as a burnt offering, this second promise followed: "Surely blessing I will bless you, and multiplying I will multiply your seed as the stars of heaven and as the sand which is on the shore of the sea." And if, according to the apostle, these are two covenants, one according to Ishmael bearing into slavery, the other according to Isaac bringing forth into freedom of our mother Jerusalem, which is in heaven, it is necessary that the number of two seeds be proclaimed, in the stars and in the sands. The friends of God, then, are counted above the sand of the sea. For who will doubt that, as regards the church, numerous throughout the world, the multitude of the Jewish nation is surpassed by the abundance of those who believe in Christ? And therefore they will be multiplied above the sand, because they will be more numerous than those who, from the impious people of the law, earthly and dry, are signified in the sands.
138.41CSEL 22:773–774
Dehinc sequitur: exsurrexi et adhuc tecum sum. surrexi ad resurrectionis gloriam spectat, sed secundum prsescientiam dei id, quod futurum est, tamquam praeteritum loquitur, quia deo ob scientiam atque uirtutem, quse futura sunt, facta sunt, ut etiam nosmetipsi facta esse existimamus, quae futura esse confidimus. id autem: et adhuc tecum sum nondum esse temporis significat; ut resurgat, quia nondum tempus sit passionis, dum se adhuc esse cum deo profiteatur. ipse enim ait: a deo exiui et ueni. adhuc ergo tecum sum, quia nondum temporis est, ut a te ueniam et ueniam in mundum, ut, quae prophetata sunt, expleam.
Then follows: "I have risen, and I am still with you." "I have risen" looks to the glory of the resurrection, but according to God's foreknowledge it speaks of what is future as past, because to God, by knowledge and power, things to come have been done, just as we ourselves think those things done which we confidently trust will be. But "and I am still with you" signifies that it is not yet the time; that he should rise, since it is not yet the time of the passion, while he declares that he is still with God. For he himself says: "I came forth from God and have come." "I am still with you," then, because it is not yet time for me to come from you and come into the world, to fulfil what has been prophesied.
138.42CSEL 22:774
Quod autem ait: si occidas deus peccatorem, numquid, qui uenit saluare quod perierat et peccatorem redimere, peccatorem precatur occidi? absit, ut uelit occidi. sed peccator occiditur, cum saeculo moritur, cum Christo conmoritur, ut uiuat in Christo. beatus apostolus ait: cotidie morior et rursum: mortuus sum legi, ut uiuam Christo. morimur autem ita, quod in nobis per fidem perempta peccata moriuntur. et audiamus adhuc, quomodo deus peccatores occidit, per id quod dicitur: mortificate ergo membra uestra super terram, fornicationes, inmunditiam, libidinem, concupiscentiam malam et auaritiam. sic peccator occiditur, cum generatio uitae spiritalis uitiorum omnium peccatorumque morte renouatur.
But as to his saying, "If you slay the sinner, O God": does he who came to save what was lost and to redeem the sinner pray that the sinner be slain? Far be it that he wishes him slain. But the sinner is slain when he dies to the world, when he dies with Christ so as to live in Christ. The blessed apostle says, "I die daily," and again, "I died to the law, that I might live to Christ." We die in this way, that the sins destroyed in us through faith die. And let us hear further how God slays sinners, through what is said: "Put to death, then, your members which are on earth: sexual immorality, uncleanness, lust, evil desire, and avarice." So the sinner is slain when the begetting of spiritual life is renewed by the death of all vices and sins.
138.43CSEL 22:774–775
Sequitur deinde: uiri sanguinum declinate a me; quoniam dicis in cogitatione: accipient in uanitate ciuitates suas. latina translatio, dum uirtutem dicti ignorat, magnam intulit obscuritatem non discernens ambigui sermonis proprietatem. quod enim nobiscum scribitur: quoniam dicis in cogitatione, cum Graecis hoc modo est: ὅτι ἐρεῖς ἐν διαλογισμῷ, et illud ἐρεῖς in pronuntiatione distinguitur, ut aut dicis intellegatur aut contentio: utrumque enim sub isdem uerbis significatur hoc dicto. sed hi, qui hebraei sermonis scientiam consecuti sunt, non dicis, sed contentiones in eo, quod ἐρεῖς translatum est, prodiderunt. et sane id ita esse ratio et intellegentia monstrabit.
Then follows: "Men of blood, turn aside from me; for you say in thought: They will receive their cities in vanity." The Latin translation, not knowing the force of the saying, has brought great obscurity, not distinguishing the proper sense of an ambiguous word. For what with us is written "for you say in thought" is with the Greeks thus: ὅτι ἐρεῖς ἐν διαλογισμῷ, and that ἐρεῖς is distinguished in pronunciation, so that it may be understood either as "you say" or as "strife": for both are signified under the same letters in this saying. But those who have attained knowledge of the Hebrew language have reported not "you say" but "strifes" for what was translated ἐρεῖς. And reason and understanding will show that this is indeed so.
138.44CSEL 22:775
Viri, inquit, sanguinum declinate a me. memini in Ezechiel dictum episcopos reos sanguinis futuros, quorum adulanti silentio plures in interitum incidissent: ecce fili hominis, speculatorem te dedi domus Israhel, et audies ex ore meo uerbum et comminaberis; et non distinxisti ei neque locutus es, ut distingueres iniquo, ut se auerteret ab itineribus suis et uiueret, inicus ille in iniquitate sua morietur, sed sanguinem eius de manu tua requiram. et inuenio et alium sanguinarium, de quo dictum est: uirum sanguinum et dolosum abominabitur deus. ut igitur uiri sanguinum sunt, quorum adulans doctrina est, ita et uiri sanguinum sunt quorum dolosa doctrina est.
"Men of blood," he says, "turn aside from me." I remember that it is said in Ezekiel that bishops will be guilty of blood, by whose flattering silence many have fallen into destruction: "Behold, son of man, I have made you a watchman for the house of Israel, and you will hear the word from my mouth and you will warn; and if you have not warned him nor spoken to warn the wicked man to turn from his ways and live, that wicked man will die in his iniquity, but his blood I will require at your hand." And I find another man of blood too, of whom it is said: "The man of blood and deceit God will abhor." As, then, those are men of blood whose teaching is flattering, so too those are men of blood whose teaching is deceitful.
138.45CSEL 22:775–776
Dolosa autem doctrina est haereticorum sub nomine dei blasphema, sub praetexto religionis impia, sub ueritatis specie fallax; quorum in animo et cogitatione solum contentionis studium persistit. nihil ad salutem hominum laborant, nihil ad spem adquirunt, nihil pacificum cogitant, ut omnis his in contentionibus labor sit et pugnam meditentur. isti infelices animas extinguunt et in uanum ecclesias sibi congregant. quas ciuitates dei secundum propheticam et euangelicam consuetudinem nuncupari frequens et plurima auctoritas est. hoc ergo significatur his dictis: uiri sanguinum declinate a me; quia contentiones in cogitatione: accipient in uanum ciuitates suas. uiri sanguinum sunt propter deperditarum animarum reatum; declinare iubentur, quia contentiones in cogitatione sunt; in uanum ciuitates dei accipiunt, infructuosarum ecclesiarum coetus per schismatum discidia reddentes.
The deceitful teaching is that of the heretics: blasphemous under the name of God, impious under the pretext of religion, false under the appearance of truth; in whose mind and thought only the zeal for strife persists. They labor for nothing toward men's salvation, they acquire nothing toward hope, they think nothing peaceable, so that all their labor is in strifes and they meditate battle. These unhappy men extinguish souls and gather churches to themselves in vain, which, by frequent and abundant authority, are called cities of God according to prophetic and Gospel usage. This, then, is signified by these words: "Men of blood, turn aside from me; for strifes are in their thought: they will receive their cities in vain." They are men of blood because of the guilt of souls lost; they are commanded to turn aside because strifes are in their thought; they receive the cities of God in vain, making assemblies of fruitless churches through the divisions of schisms.
138.46CSEL 22:776
Sed plane, quia pax et iustitia et ueritas est, adfectum in eos suum ostendit dicens: nonne odientes te, domine, odiui et super inimicos tuos tabescebam? perfecto odio oderam eos; inimici facti sunt mihi. est religiosum odium, quotiensque is nobis odio est, qui deum odit. inimicos quidem nostros amare praecipimur; sed nostros, non et dei. nam iuxta deum et patrem et matrem et coniugem et filios et fratres odisse deuotum est. odit ergo odientes deum et inimicorum odio tabescit et odit odio perfecto, et inimici sibi facti sunt. non enim filius diuersus a patre est, ut non alteri inimicus utrique fiat inimicus.
But plainly, since he is peace and righteousness and truth, he shows his disposition toward them, saying: "Did I not hate those who hate you, O Lord, and pine away over your enemies? With perfect hatred I hated them; they have become enemies to me." There is a religious hatred whenever he is hateful to us who hates God. We are commanded to love our enemies; but ours, not God's as well. For, next to God, it is devout to hate father and mother and wife and children and brothers. He hates, then, those who hate God, pines away with hatred of the enemies, hates with perfect hatred, and they have become enemies to him. For the Son is not different from the Father, so that one who is not an enemy to the one should become an enemy to both.
138.47CSEL 22:776–777
Concludit deinde libertatis suas fiducia simulque, ut ea, quse per prsescientiam tamquam gesta memorauerat, nunc ad demonstrationem temporis gerenda monstraret, dicens: proba me, deus, et scito cor meum; interroga me et scito semitas meas. et uide, si uia iniquitatis in me est, et deduc me in uiam aeternam. humanae naturse fiducia ista non est, ut probari se uelit, ut sciri cor suum postulet, ut cognosci semitas suas expectet, ut inspici non metuat, si uia iniquitatis in se sit, ut per hanc condicionem in aeternam uiam deducatur. uox ista eius tantum potest esse, qui dixit: ecce uenit princeps huius mundi et non inuenit in me quicquam. solus enim extra peccatum est dominus noster Iesus Christus, qui est benedictus in saecula saeculorum. amen.
Then he concludes with the confidence of his freedom and at the same time, to show that what he had recalled as done through foreknowledge was now to be done at the appointed time, says: "Prove me, O God, and know my heart; question me and know my paths. And see if there is a way of iniquity in me, and lead me in the eternal way." This confidence does not belong to human nature: to wish to be proved, to ask that its heart be known, to expect its paths to be learned, not to fear being examined whether there is a way of iniquity in it, so as to be led on this condition into the eternal way. This voice can be his alone who said: "Behold, the prince of this world comes, and finds nothing in me." For only our Lord Jesus Christ is without sin, who is blessed for ever and ever. Amen.
Tractates 139
139.1CSEL 22:777
Coeptus est psalmus ex persona hominis inter multas infestationes inimicorum anxii, aduersus quem multae insidise et doli plures sint: et conuenire hsec omnia in personam huius prophetae Dauid uidentur, cuius uita infesta undique et plena semper periculis fuit, Saul eum in deserto, in urbibus, bello ac dolis persequente, filio quoque ipsius Abessalon multa aduersum regnum uitamque eius moliente et audente. multis praeterea aliis et domesticis et extraneis insidiis subiectus fuit semper. sed nihil speciale ex his omnibus in psalmo continetur, ut propria personae eius oratio esse credatur. sed generalis aut forte ex spiritu prophetise psalmus esse noscitur unumquemque nostrum per orationis exemplum, cum in mediis infestantium in nos odiis iactemur, erudiens, quali deum prece oporteat deprecari.
The psalm begins in the person of a man anxious amid many assaults of enemies, against whom there are many snares and more deceits: and all this seems to fit the person of this prophet David, whose life was beset on every side and always full of dangers, with Saul persecuting him in the desert, in cities, by war and by deceits, and his own son Absalom too contriving and daring much against his kingdom and life. Besides, he was always subject to many other snares, both domestic and foreign. But nothing specific from all these is contained in the psalm, so that it might be believed to be a prayer proper to his person. Rather the psalm is recognized to be general, or perhaps from the spirit of prophecy, teaching each one of us by the example of prayer with what kind of prayer we ought to entreat God when we are tossed amid the hatreds of those who assail us.
139.2CSEL 22:777–778
Sed contuenti mihi penitus quasdam uirtutes proprietatesque uerborum, quse ultra humani sermonis consuetudinem altius nescio quid et sublimius elocuntur, eius potius hominis, in quo ex partu uirginis ad sacramentum humanae salutis unigenitus dei filius natus est, repertus est psalmus iste intellegi oportere. secundum eam enim quse in se generis fuit utriusque naturam, dei uidelicet atque hominis, non modo in euangeliis, sed etiam in prophetis ita coaptatis ad utrumque dictis locutus est, ut dum diuinitatis suse inpassibilem atque indemutabilem uirtutem docet, infirmitatem quoque naturae corporeae non taceret: rursumque, cum ex susceptione carnis infirmitatis in eo sermo esset, praeconium quoque mox non infirmandse ex aliquo diuinitatis adsisteret. quod enim deus est, naturae suae est; quod autem homo fuit, naturae nostrae adsumptio est. loquitur itaque in psalmo ex infirmitatis nostrae, quam adsumpsit, affectu, cum traditorem suum nouit, cum consilia aduersum se inita prospicit, cum quaestionum praelia et obtrectationum uenena perpetitur, cum temptationum scandala et uerborum laqueos euitat, cum patri confitetur, cum ad eum orat, cum ei omnis uirtus ab eo est, cum, licet ex infirmitate corporis anxius sit, non se solum tamen relinquendum in die passionis meminerit. haec igitur omnia ex persona eius in psalmo contineri docemur: atque ita, ut in his, quae naturae humanae societas permittit, personse etiam nostrae ex aliquo intellegi possit oratio.
But as I looked more deeply into certain forces and proper senses of the words, which express something higher and more sublime beyond the habit of human speech, this psalm was found to be understood rather as of that man in whom, from the virgin's childbirth, the only-begotten Son of God was born for the mystery of human salvation. For according to the nature of both kinds that was in him, namely of God and of man, he spoke not only in the Gospels but also in the prophets with words so fitted to both that, while he taught the impassible and unchangeable power of his divinity, he did not keep silent about the weakness of bodily nature either; and again, when the speech in him was of weakness from the taking of flesh, a proclamation of his divinity, in no way weakened, soon stood by. For that he is God belongs to his own nature; but that he was man is the assumption of our nature. So in the psalm he speaks from the feeling of our weakness, which he assumed: when he knows his betrayer, when he foresees the plans formed against him, when he endures the battles of questions and the poisons of detraction, when he avoids the stumbling blocks of temptations and the snares of words, when he confesses to the Father, when he prays to him, when all his strength is from him, when, though anxious from the weakness of the body, he remembers that he will not be left alone on the day of the passion. We are taught, then, that all these things are contained in the psalm in his person: and in such a way that, in what the fellowship of human nature allows, the prayer can also in some measure be understood as of our person.
139.3CSEL 22:778–779
Hoc enim, quod ita coeptum est: eripe me, domine, ex homine malo, a uiro iniquo libera me, ad communem quoque credentium omnium pertinet precem. omnes enim insidise, quascumque nobis spiritales nequitiae prsetendunt, maxime per homines aptantur: et occasiones uitiis nostris alienae naturae peruersitas subministrat. in lites nos inicus exagitat, in anxietates aduersantium et insidiantium nobis terror inpellit in libidinem facultas se in id praebentis inuitat. oculus enim meretricis laqueus est peccatoris; oramus ergo in his malis positi dicentes: eripe me, domine, ab homine malo, a uiro iniquo libera me. sed propria esse haec oratio domini ex consequenti docetur, cum ait: qui cogitauerunt malitias in corde. cogitationes cordis nosse non nostrum est, sed eius, de quo dictum est: scrutans corda et renes deus, eius quoque, qui dixit sciens cogitationes eorum: quid cogitatis mala in cordibus uestris? ille occultos omnes malignorum cordium sensus penetrabili atque inuios aditus obeunte natura uirtutis suse contuetur.
For its beginning, "Rescue me, O Lord, from the evil man; deliver me from the unjust man," belongs also to the common prayer of all believers. For all the snares that the spiritual wickednesses set before us are fitted chiefly through men, and the perversity of another's nature supplies occasions for our vices. The wicked man stirs us to quarrels; the terror of adversaries and plotters drives us into anxieties; the opportunity of one who offers herself for it invites us to lust. For "the eye of a harlot is the snare of a sinner"; so, placed among these evils, we pray, saying: "Rescue me, O Lord, from the evil man; deliver me from the unjust man." But that this prayer is properly the Lord's is taught by what follows, when he says: "who have devised evils in their heart." To know the thoughts of the heart is not ours, but his of whom it is said, "God searches hearts and reins," and his also who, knowing their thoughts, said: "Why do you think evil in your hearts?" He beholds all the hidden thoughts of malignant hearts by the nature of his power, which penetrates and goes through impassable approaches.
139.4CSEL 22:779–780
Sed qui eripi se de homine uno malo et iniquo deprecatus est, in quo significare traditorem suum existimatur, iam de plurimis mala in corda cogitantibus loquitur dicens: qui cogitauerunt malitias in corde, tota die constituebant prselia. acuerunt linguas suas sicut serpentes: uenenum aspidum sub labiis eorum. non omni et toto aduersum Dauid die armis certatum est neque semper instructis prseliis. aduersus autem dominum secundum euangelicas operationes eius nullum tempus uacuum fuisse ab insectantium odiis inuenimus. paralyticum sanat: mox de eo ob inlicitam, ut putabant, peccati indulgentiam uenenato ore disseritur. aridam manum reformat: statim uiolatee legis reis adscribitur. dsemones curat: continuo per Beelzebul daemonum principem haec perficere arguitur. nihil est, quod non ei plenum semper insidiis sit, quod non uiperese linguae ueneno obiectum sit. nostra quoque omnium uita maximeque eorum, qui religioni student, quae aduersantium uirtutum sustinet bella, quae obtrectationum uenenata iacula suscipit! quo fraudulentse blandiloquentise ueneno adpetitur! et hsec omnia per homines, in quibus spiritales nequitiae operantur, existunt scriptum est enim: excitauit dominus satanan Salomoni, Ader Idumaeum. et aduersatus est Ader, non ut homo, sed ut satanas Salomoni omnibus diebus uitae eius. et Salomoni quidem, quia ita meruit, Ader in satanan a deo est excitatus; sed per istius modi homines haec multimoda infestantium in nos odia desseuiunt inimicaeque uirtutes horum ministerio grassantur.
But he who prayed to be rescued from one evil and unjust man, by whom his betrayer is thought to be signified, now speaks of many who devise evil in their hearts, saying: "who devised evils in their heart, all day they set up battles. They sharpened their tongues like serpents: the venom of asps is under their lips." Not on every whole day was there fighting with arms against David, nor always in drawn-up battles. But against the Lord, according to his works in the Gospels, we find that no time was free from the hatreds of his pursuers. He heals a paralytic: at once there is talk about him with a venomous mouth for what they thought an unlawful forgiveness of sin. He restores a withered hand: at once he is enrolled among those guilty of violating the law. He heals demoniacs: at once he is accused of doing these things through Beelzebul, the prince of demons. There is nothing that is not always full of snares for him, nothing not exposed to the venom of a viper's tongue. Our life too, of all of us, and especially of those devoted to religion: what wars of hostile powers it sustains, what poisoned darts of detraction it receives! With what venom of deceitful flattery it is attacked! And all these arise through men, in whom the spiritual wickednesses work. For it is written: "The Lord raised up a satan against Solomon, Ader the Edomite." And Ader opposed Solomon, not as a man but as a satan, all the days of his life. And against Solomon indeed, because he so deserved, Ader was raised up by God as a satan; but through men of this kind these manifold hatreds of those assailing us rage, and the hostile powers prowl through their ministry.
139.5CSEL 22:780
Intercessio autem diapsalmse adtulisse uidetur aut personse aut sensus demutationem. fit autem repetitio orationis eiusdem: ita tamen, ut absolutius ea, quse in confusum ante adiecta sunt, recenseantur et, quae superius fuerat de uerbis, nunc sit querella de factis. custodi me, domine, de manu peccatoris et ab hominibus iniquis eripe me, qui cogitauerunt supplantare gressus meos. ab uno tantum csepta deprecatio refertur ad plures, ut significare et in traditorem et in pluribus populum nosceretur. et uni quidem et nunc et superius malitiam et peccatum et iniquitatem exprobrat; in plurimis uero cogitatas supplantationes, absconsos laqueos, extensas funium captiones et continuata semitis scandala arguit dicens:
The interposition of the diapsalma seems to have brought a change either of person or of sense. There is a repetition of the same prayer, yet in such a way that what was added before in a general way is now reviewed more completely, and what was before a complaint about words is now a complaint about deeds. "Guard me, O Lord, from the hand of the sinner, and rescue me from unjust men, who have devised to trip up my steps." The entreaty begun against one only is turned to many, so that it might be recognized to signify the betrayer in the one and the people in the many. And to the one, both now and above, he reproaches malice, sin, and iniquity; but in the many he denounces devised trippings, hidden snares, stretched-out traps of ropes, and stumbling blocks set continually along the paths, saying:
139.6CSEL 22:780–781
Qui cogitauerunt supplantare gressus meos. absconderunt superbi laqueum mihi et funes extenderunt muscipula pedibus meis, continuata semitis scandala posuerunt mihi. cogitauerunt enim synagogse principes supplantare gressus eius, cum post depulsam necem Lazari de eo occidendo cogitant, cum ob receptos oculos caeco illi a natiuitate maledicunt, cum taceri de eo decernunt, cum mortem confessoribus eius denuntiant. egregium itaque diuinarum operationum suarum gressum atque cursum istius modi rebus subplantare cogitauerunt. absconderunt autem laqueos superbi, cum Sadducaei fraudulentiam simulatae de resurrectione interrogationis occultant, cum responsionis laqueum captioso sermone praetendunt; superbi, cum admisceri peccatoribus dedignantur, cum conuiuia publicanorum ei, qui peccatorum est remissor, exprobrant. funes etiam extenderunt in muscipulum pedibus eius, cum tributum poscitur, cum de dando Caesari tributo interrogatur. absconsus autem superius laqueus fuit, nunc autem funes in laqueum extensi sunt, ut ualidior hic interrogationis laqueus esse nosceretur in funibus, cum per extensum interrogationis laqueum captiosse ab eo professionis responsio aduersus nomen Csesaris quaereretur. continuantes autem semitse scandala posuerunt ei, cum de mandatis legis interrogatur, cum diues, legi utpote satisfaciens, quid sibi adhuc desit, requirit, cum apud eum de repudii condicione tractatur. hsec enim interrogationum scandala uise suse doctrinaeque legis continuantes statuerunt, ut sub specie earum ac familiaritate, quae in lege scriptae sunt, quaestionum haec ei ubique continuantium semitse interrogationum et responsionum scandala ponerentur.
"Who have devised to trip up my steps. The proud have hidden a snare for me, and stretched out ropes as a trap for my feet; they have set stumbling blocks continually along the paths for me." For the rulers of the synagogue devised to trip up his steps when, after the death of Lazarus had been undone, they plan to kill him, when they curse the man blind from birth for having received his sight, when they decree silence about him, when they threaten death to those who confess him. So they devised to trip up by such means the excellent step and course of his divine works. The proud hid snares when the Sadducees concealed the deceit of a feigned question about the resurrection, when they held out the snare of an answer with a captious speech; proud, when they disdain to mix with sinners, when they reproach him who is the forgiver of sins for the banquets of tax collectors. They stretched out ropes too as a trap for his feet, when tribute is demanded, when he is asked about giving tribute to Caesar. Above, a snare was hidden; but now ropes are stretched out into a snare, so that this snare of questioning might be recognized as stronger in the ropes, when, through the stretched-out snare of questioning, an answer of captious profession against the name of Caesar was sought from him. And continuing along the path they set stumbling blocks for him, when he is questioned about the commandments of the law, when the rich man, as one who had satisfied the law, asks what he still lacks, when the condition of divorce is discussed before him. For these stumbling blocks of questions they set continuing along his way and the teaching of the law, so that, under the appearance of and familiarity with what is written in the law, these stumbling blocks of questions and answers might be set for him everywhere along the path of those who continue.
139.7CSEL 22:781–782
Nobis autem meminimus uitaeque nostrae ubique scandala, ubique funes, ubique laqueos occurrere, nihilque esse, ubi non prsetentse nobis semper insidiae sint. et difficile est nunc laqueo uentrem absoluere: quia confusio illis est, quorum deus uenter est. rarum etiam est nunc a laqueo oculum liberare: quia qui ad concupiscentiam uidit, iam moechatus in corde est. arduum quoque est linguam laqueo eximere: de omni enim otioso uerbo in die iudicii erit ratio reddenda. maximi etiam laboris est cor a laqueo referre: malse enim cogitationes de corde exeunt. hi omnibus nobis laquei ubique prsetensi sunt; et orandus est dominus, ut ab his omnibus laqueis fidei nostrse pinnis et spiritus euolemus.
But we remember that for us and for our life stumbling blocks, ropes, and snares meet us everywhere, and that there is nothing where snares are not always set before us. And it is hard now to free the belly from the snare, because confusion is for those whose god is the belly. It is rare too now to free the eye from the snare, because he who has looked to desire has already committed adultery in his heart. It is hard also to rescue the tongue from the snare, for account must be given on the day of judgment for every idle word. It is the greatest labor too to bring back the heart from the snare, for evil thoughts come out of the heart. These snares are set everywhere for all of us; and the Lord must be prayed to, that we may fly away from all these snares on the wings of our faith and of the Spirit.
139.8CSEL 22:782
Dehinc sequitur: dixi domino: deus meus es tu: inaurire, domine, uocem orationis mese. domine, uirtus salutis mese, obumbrasti super caput meum in die belli. ne tradas, domine, a desiderio meo peccatori: cogitauerunt, non tradas me, domine, ne umquam exaltentur. et hic intercedens diapsalma uidetur aliquam demutationem attulisse, et non exiguam quidem; namque cum superius de cogitata subplantatione, de absconditis laqueis, de extensis muscipulis, de scandalis positis sermo omnis fuisset, nunc ad deum refertur oratio: dixi domino: deus meus es tu. non leuis atque exiguae fiducise est domino dixisse: deus meus es tu. loqui istud mens libidinosa, auara, insolens, ebria fideliter non potest. renuntiandum his omnibus est et a seruitute eorum ac famulatu desinendum est, ut ab his desinentes dicere audeamus: dixi domino: deus meus es tu. et hsec quidem personae nostrse, quam tantum, in quantum fas est, psalmo admiscemus, ita coaptata sunt.
Then follows: "I said to the Lord: You are my God; give ear, O Lord, to the voice of my prayer. O Lord, strength of my salvation, you overshadowed my head in the day of battle. Do not hand me over, O Lord, from my desire to the sinner: they have devised; do not abandon me, O Lord, lest they ever be exalted." Here too the interposed diapsalma seems to have brought some change, and not a small one; for whereas above all the speech had been about devised tripping, hidden snares, stretched-out traps, and stumbling blocks set, now the prayer is turned to God: "I said to the Lord: You are my God." It is no light and slight confidence to have said to the Lord, "You are my God." A mind that is lustful, greedy, insolent, drunken cannot say this faithfully. We must renounce all these and cease from their servitude and service, so that, ceasing from them, we may dare to say: "I said to the Lord: You are my God." And these things are thus fitted to our person, which we mingle with the psalm only so far as is right.
139.9CSEL 22:782–783
Sed et domino quoque usitatum et frequens et proprium est, ut dixerit: dixi domino: deus meus es tu. numquam confessionis huius honorem negauit, ut et dominum confiteretur et deum dicens: confiteor tibi, pater domine caeli et terrae; et rursum: ad deum meum et ad deum uestrum. oratio quoque ei semper ad deum omnis fuit. Lazarum suscitaturus orat; panes et pisces benedicturus ipso ad caelum aspectu precatur; calicem bibiturus pernox orat. post confessionem itaque domini et dei sui sequitur: inaurire, domine, uocem orationis mese. honoris confessio praecessit, cum dominum suum ac deum dicit. exaudiendse autem orationis precatio consequitur, cum se orat audiri.
But it is customary, frequent, and proper to the Lord too that he should have said, "I said to the Lord: You are my God." He never refused the honor of this confession, so that he confessed him both as Lord and as God, saying: "I confess to you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth"; and again: "to my God and to your God." His whole prayer too was always to God. About to raise Lazarus, he prays; about to bless the loaves and fishes, he prays with his very gaze toward heaven; about to drink the cup, he prays all night. After the confession of his Lord and God, then, there follows: "Give ear, O Lord, to the voice of my prayer." The confession of honor came first, when he calls him his Lord and God; the petition that his prayer be heard follows, when he prays to be heard.
139.10CSEL 22:783
Sed in eo, quod sequitur: domine, uirtus salutis mese, non communis est fiducise professio. non enim ait: salus uirtutis mese. humani namque uoti res ista est, ut uirtuti nostrae salutem precemur, ut sanitas his, in quibus ualemus, a deo sit. haec autem e contrario precatio est, ut non uirtutis suae salus, sed salutis suse uirtus a deo sit. qui saluti uirtutem precatur, iam de salute non ambigit et certus est nihil in se caducum, nihil mortale esse. sed ei, quod adsumpsit, infirmo ut uirtus praestetur, orat: corpus dominus in se gerebat, quod, tametsi secundum nos morti debitum erat, non tamen erat obnoxium corruptioni, ipso per prophetam loquente: quoniam non derelinques animam meam in inferno, nec dabis sanctum tuum uidere corruptionem.
But in what follows, "O Lord, strength of my salvation," there is no common profession of confidence. For he does not say "salvation of my strength." For it belongs to human prayer that we pray for salvation for our strength, that soundness from God may be in those things in which we are strong. But this, on the contrary, is a prayer that not the salvation of his strength but the strength of his salvation may be from God. He who prays for strength for his salvation already does not doubt about salvation and is sure that there is nothing perishable, nothing mortal in him. But he prays that strength may be given to the weakness he assumed: the Lord bore in himself a body which, although like ours it was due to death, was not subject to corruption, as he himself speaks through the prophet: "For you will not leave my soul in hell, nor will you give your holy one to see corruption."
139.11CSEL 22:783–784
Non est igitur de salute naturae huius in se infirmis incertus. solum a deo uirtutem eius, quse in se sit, salutis orat et orat per hanc confidentiam, qua ait: obumbrasti super caput meum in die belli. si ex persona cuiusque hominis psalmus hic omnis est, quomodo sibi tam diuersa conuenient, ut, cum dictum sit: eripe me, domine, ab homine malo et: custodi me de manu peccatoris, domine, nunc rursum securus de omnibus dicat: obumbrasti super caput meum in die belli? et cum superius ex metu fuerit oratio, nunc sit gratulatio ex securitate? hoc autem totum dici ab eo ex ratione poterit, qui gerens hominis deique naturam habebat et ex hominis infirmitate trepidationis affectum et ex conscientia diuinitatis fiduciam securitatis. scit autem se in die gloriosi illius belli, quo mortem perimet, quo diabolum uincet, quo omnes potestates inimicas triumpho crucis suae configet, obumbratum protectumque esse. namque cum ex persona dei patris dictum de eo ante fuerit: cum ipso sum in tribulatione et rursum: manus enim mea auxiliabitur ei et brachium meum confortabit eum, nihil proficiet inimicus in eo et filius iniquitatis non adiciet nocere eum, quid enim proficit inimicus Iudam ad uoluntatem traditionis inspirans? permissum enim corpus passioni est; sed permissi sibi corporis dominata mors non fuit: sanctus enim non uidit corruptionem. et iniquitatis filius cum eum traderet, ad nocendum quid adiecit? non modo ad uitam corpus rediit ex morte, sed etiam in diuinitatis gloriam natura curruptionis absorta est.
He is not, then, uncertain about the salvation of this nature weak in itself. He asks of God only the strength of the salvation that is in him, and asks with that confidence by which he says: "You overshadowed my head in the day of battle." If this whole psalm is in the person of any man, how will such different things agree with him, that, when it has been said, "Rescue me, O Lord, from the evil man," and "Guard me from the hand of the sinner, O Lord," he should now again say, secure about everything, "You overshadowed my head in the day of battle"? And that, whereas the prayer above came from fear, now there should be rejoicing from security? All this can be said with reason by him who, bearing the nature of man and of God, had from the weakness of man the feeling of trembling and from the consciousness of divinity the confidence of security. He knows that on the day of that glorious battle, in which he will destroy death, conquer the devil, and nail all the hostile powers to the triumph of his cross, he has been overshadowed and protected. For since it had been said of him before in the person of God the Father, "I am with him in tribulation," and again, "For my hand will help him, and my arm will strengthen him; the enemy will gain nothing against him, and the son of iniquity will not again harm him," what indeed does the enemy gain by inspiring Judas to the will of betrayal? The body was allowed to suffer; but death did not rule over the body allowed to it: for the holy one did not see corruption. And when the son of iniquity betrayed him, what did he add to harming him? Not only did the body return from death to life, but the nature of corruption was swallowed up into the glory of divinity.
139.12CSEL 22:784–785
Securus itaque et confidens obumbratum se esse in die belli etiam hoc precatur: ne tradas, domine, a desiderio meo peccatori. qui ait: non ueni uoluntatem meam facere, sed uoluntatem eius, qui me misit, susceptum opus etiam pro obsedientise obsequella festinat inplere; sed ita, ut meminerimus esse in eo uoluntatis officium. uult namque quae pater uoluit. id enim, quod ait: non ueni uoluntatem meam facere, sed uoluntatem eius, qui me misit, eum, a quo est missus cuique obsedit, ostendit: non tamen sibi detrahit uoluntatem. omnia ergo, quaecumque patri placita sunt, consummare optat et uniuersa, quaecumque sibi in passione desiderabilia sunt, exsequi properat, ne quid ex his sit, quod praeueniens peccator impediat. desiderio desiderauit cum discipulis pascham manducare, festinato paschae caenam peregit. desiderat calicem passionis bibere dicens: calicem, quem pater meus mihi dedit, non bibam illum? quaerentibus se ultro his, qui ad conprehendendum eum uenerant, et interrogantibus, quis Iesus esset, ingessit. scit sibi aceti poculum esse potandum: hoc ut bibat postulat. et magnum in eo, cum bibisset, uoluntatis suae fructum capiens ait: consummatum est, quo in uerbo desiderabilis uoti gratulatio continetur. liberari animam suam a framea in psalmis frequenter orauerat, os non comminuendum significauerat, sortitu uestem suam obtinendam denuntiauerat. hsec omnia, quae desiderii sui sunt, ad prophetiae fidem ut inpleantur, orat: ne quid ex his peccatori sit potestatis, ne pascham praeueniat, quae desiderio desideratur, ne calicem passionis ingerere non audeat — nam ad primam domini responsionem peccator omnis, qui ad conprehendendum eum uenerat, procidit —, ne acetum, quod offerendum est, non praesto sit, ne ante, quam spiritum emittit, lancea latus miles fodiat, ne frangendi ossis manente adhuc spiritu pateat occasio, ne quid ex prophetia minus fiat, ne quid peccatori ex desideriis suis tradatur, sed in se omnia, quse et desiderata sibi et prophetata sunt, inpleantur. orat autem de his, non quod inplenda non essent, sed ut de se prophetata esse intellegi possint.
Secure, then, and confident that he is overshadowed in the day of battle, he prays also this: "Do not hand me over, O Lord, from my desire to the sinner." He who says, "I have not come to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me," hastens to complete the work undertaken also out of the compliance of obedience; but in such a way that we remember there is in him the function of will. For he wills what the Father willed. For by saying, "I have not come to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me," he shows him by whom he was sent and whom he obeyed; yet he does not take will away from himself. He desires, then, to complete all that pleases the Father, and hastens to carry out all that is desirable to him in the passion, so that there may be nothing among these things which the sinner, coming first, might hinder. "With desire he desired" to eat the Passover with his disciples; he hastened to finish the Passover supper. He desires to drink the cup of the passion, saying: "The cup my Father has given me, shall I not drink it?" To those who had come to seize him he offered himself of his own accord, as they sought him and asked who Jesus was. He knows he must drink the cup of vinegar: he asks for it so as to drink it. And reaping in it, when he had drunk, the great fruit of his will, he says, "It is finished," in which word is contained the rejoicing of a desired wish. He had often prayed in the psalms that his soul be delivered from the sword, had signified that his bone was not to be broken, had announced that his garment was to be obtained by lot. He prays that all these things that belong to his desire may be fulfilled for the faithfulness of prophecy: that the sinner may have no power over any of them, may not forestall the Passover which is desired with desire, may not fail to dare to offer the cup of the passion (for at the Lord's first answer every sinner who had come to seize him fell down), that the vinegar to be offered may not be lacking, that the soldier may not pierce his side with the lance before he sends forth his spirit, that no occasion may open for breaking a bone while the spirit still remains, that nothing of the prophecy may be lacking, that nothing of his desires may be handed over to the sinner, but that all things both desired by him and prophesied may be fulfilled in him. He prays about these things not because they were not going to be fulfilled, but so that they might be understood to have been prophesied about him.
139.13CSEL 22:785–786
Cogitauerunt, inquit, aduersus me: non derelinquas me, ne quando exaltentur. multa aduersus eum cogitata sunt; sed maxime illud, ut pecunia militibus conlata fama ab his furati corporis uenderetur. sed eo in corpore rursus adstante inanis hsec impise cogitationis meditatio fuit. non relictus peccatoribus exaltandi se locus ullus est: inpletur prophetia. pendet in ligno uita eorum, aceto ac felle potatur, anima eius a framea liberatur, os non conteritur, sors super uestem mittitur, nihil e desideriis unigeniti filii dei peccatori traditur, tertia die resurgit, non relinquitur in inferno nec corruptionem sanctus uidet: et omnia, quae geruntur in domino, ad confundendas et consternandas impiorum cogitationes habent et rerum prsesentium admirabilem efficientiam et prophetiae indemutabilem ueritatem.
"They have devised," he says, "against me; do not abandon me, lest they ever be exalted." Many things were devised against him, but above all this: that, money having been given to the soldiers, a report of the body's being stolen should be sold by them. But since he stood again in that same body, this meditation of impious thought was empty. No room is left for sinners to exalt themselves: the prophecy is fulfilled. Their life hangs on the tree, he is given vinegar and gall to drink, his soul is delivered from the sword, his bone is not broken, a lot is cast over his garment, nothing of the desires of the only-begotten Son of God is handed over to the sinner, he rises on the third day, he is not left in hell, nor does the holy one see corruption: and everything that is done in the Lord has, to confound and dismay the thoughts of the impious, both the wonderful efficacy of present events and the unchangeable truth of prophecy.
139.14CSEL 22:786–787
Dehinc sequitur: caput circuitus eorum, labor labiorum ipsorum operiet eos. cadent super eos carbones ignis, et deicies eos, in miseriis non subsistent. post superiorem sermonem, in quo omnis ad deum de se fuerat oratio, nunc etiam interuentu diapsalma demutauit ordinem sensus. rettulit enim hac peccatorum iustissimam poenam, quos primum ipsum illud conuentus sui caput, deinde labor labiorum suorum et omne maledictionis opus operiet. ut enim omnibus sanctis caput Christus est ita omnibus iniquis caput diabolus est. testatur autem frequenter istos impios erga se circuitus dominus, cum ait: circumdederunt me gemitus mortis et rursum: tauri pingues obsederunt me et iterum: circumdantes circumdederunt me et statim: circumdederunt me sicut apes. quod autem principe diabolo haec gesta sint, testantur euangelia, cum dicunt: et inmisit se diabolus in cor Iudse, ut traderet eum. laboratum est autem multa uoce populi, cum adclamatum est: crucifige, crucifige. operiet igitur eos caput circuitus et labor labiorum eorum, ut, cum alii inmortalitatis gloriam induantur, illi impietatis sum pudore et damnatione diaboli operiantur. et quae ea damnatio esset, qua operirentur, adiecit: cadent super eos carbones ignis, super terram deicies eos, in miseriis non subsistent. haec impiorum operimenta sunt, hsec inreligiosorum aeterna uestis est, ut aduersus decidentes carbones et ingruentes miserias non subsistentes tali cum ipso circuitus sui capite et labore labiorum damnationis suae onere deprimantur.
Then follows: "The head of those around them, the labor of their own lips will cover them. Coals of fire will fall upon them, and you will cast them down; in miseries they will not stand." After the preceding speech, in which the whole prayer to God had been about himself, now, with the interposition of a diapsalma, he has changed the order of the sense. For he has reported the most just punishment of sinners, whom first that very head of their assembly, then the labor of their lips and all the work of cursing will cover. For as Christ is the head of all the saints, so the devil is the head of all the wicked. The Lord often testifies to these impious encirclings around him, when he says, "The groans of death surrounded me," and again, "Fat bulls besieged me," and again, "Encircling they encircled me," and at once, "They surrounded me like bees." And that these things were done with the devil as prince the Gospels testify, when they say: "And the devil put it into the heart of Judas to betray him." And there was labor with the great voice of the people, when they cried out: "Crucify, crucify." The head of those around them and the labor of their lips will cover them, then, so that, while others are clothed with the glory of immortality, they are covered with the shame of their impiety and the condemnation of the devil. And what that condemnation would be with which they would be covered he added: "Coals of fire will fall upon them; you will cast them down upon the earth; in miseries they will not stand." These are the coverings of the impious, this is the eternal garment of the irreligious: that, not standing against the falling coals and the assailing miseries, they are pressed down with the very head of those around them and the labor of their lips by the burden of their condemnation.
139.15CSEL 22:787–788
Tenuit autem etiam nunc eum ordinem, quo in superioribus usus est, ut, cum in pluribus populum ostendat, nunc in uno Iudam significare uideatur dicens: uir linguosus non dirigetur super terram: uirum iniustum mala capient in interitum. in linguoso anceps et dubium et fallax os proditoris ostenditur, qui sero criminis sui scelere conperto laqueo se a uita et fide profugus suspendit. nihil enim directum in eo, nihil simplex, nihil absolutum fuit: fur antea, dehinc proditor, postremo ipse in se dignus ultor; nunc mulierem effuso in caput domini unguento damni inutilis arguens, nunc Iudseis omnes domini aditus et egressus nuntians, nunc de pretio iusti sanguinis paciscens; linguosus semper, semper in uerbis, ut in eum prophetse dictum conpetenter aptetur: de multiloquio non effugies peccatum. hic ergo in hoc multiloquio suo peccator non directus in uitam est neque rectum fidei iter tenuit, sed, ut dignum est, mala eum in interitum ceperunt. impius in dominum cum fuisset, postea in semet quoque ipsum impius mansit. fur pecuniae, uenditor sanguinis iusti, proditor dei et, quantum in se est, parricida nec uitse ueniam potuit habere nec mortis.
He has kept even now the order he used above, so that, while showing the people in the many, he now seems to signify Judas in the one, saying: "A talkative man will not be directed on the earth; evils will seize the unjust man for destruction." In the talkative man is shown the two-faced, doubtful, and deceitful mouth of the betrayer, who, having learned too late the wickedness of his crime, fled from life and faith and hanged himself with a noose. For nothing in him was straight, nothing simple, nothing sincere: a thief before, then a betrayer, finally a worthy avenger upon himself; now accusing the woman of useless waste for pouring ointment on the Lord's head, now reporting to the Jews all the Lord's comings and goings, now bargaining over the price of righteous blood; always talkative, always in words, so that the prophet's saying fittingly applies to him: "In much speaking you will not escape sin." This sinner, then, in his much speaking was not directed toward life nor held to the straight way of faith, but, as was fitting, evils seized him for destruction. Having been impious toward the Lord, he afterward remained impious toward himself too. Thief of money, seller of righteous blood, betrayer of God, and, as far as lay in him, a murderer, he could have pardon neither for his life nor for his death.
139.16CSEL 22:788
Non nescius itaque huius uindictse suae unigenitus deus est; ait enim: cognoui, quia faciet dominus iudicium inopis et uindictam pauperum. pauper dominus secundum hominem est. paupertauit enim se secundum apostolum, ut nos locupletaremur, cui in saeculi rebus nihil nisi corpus fuit. huius enim salutis causa nasci inops uoluit ex uirgine: non pecuniam, non agrum, non pecus caelorum dominus elegit. pauper ergo in homine tantum suo fuit. sed non solum iudicium inopis, sed et uindictam pauperum dominus faciet. iudicium inopis referri ad damnationem eorum, qui iniusti in dominum extiterunt, oportet. conuenit enim eos secundum iudicium, non secundum uindictam iudicari. inferioris naturae est, qui debeat uindicari. uindicantur ceteri pauperes, id est, qui dominum exemplo passionis secuti sunt, qui ex contemptu saeculi et pecuniae pauperes fuerunt. fit ergo iudicium inopis, cum ob passionem domini impii iudicantur. pauperes uero uindicantur, quorum sub ara occisorum sanguis clamat uindictam in impios postulans: qui cotidie in gloria martyrii manentes dei nomini confitentur.
The only-begotten God is not ignorant, then, of this vengeance of his; for he says: "I have known that the Lord will execute judgment for the needy and vengeance for the poor." The Lord is poor according to the man. For, according to the apostle, he made himself poor so that we might be made rich, he who had nothing in the affairs of the world but a body. For the sake of this salvation he willed to be born needy of a virgin: the Lord of heaven chose not money, not land, not cattle. He was poor, then, only in his man. But the Lord will execute not only judgment for the needy but also vengeance for the poor. Judgment for the needy must be referred to the condemnation of those who were unjust toward the Lord. For it is fitting that they be judged according to judgment, not according to vengeance. It belongs to an inferior nature to need to be avenged. The other poor are avenged, that is, those who followed the Lord by the example of his passion, who were poor from contempt of the world and of money. Judgment for the needy, then, is made when the impious are judged because of the Lord's passion. But the poor are avenged, whose blood, of those slain beneath the altar, cries out demanding vengeance on the impious: who daily, remaining in the glory of martyrdom, confess the name of God.
139.17CSEL 22:788–789
Et sermo ipse, quo psalmus clauditur, ita loquitur: attamen iusti confitebuntur nomini tuo et habitabunt recti cum facie tua. iustorum confessio potest etiam corporalis uideri, quia plures in carne adhuc licet positi dei nomini confitentur. recti autem habitantes cum facie dei nihil in se corporale retinere intelleguntur. natura enim carnis dei non patitur aspectum ipso dicente: nemo uidebit hominum faciem meam et uiuet. hoc iam caelestium est et transformatorum et terrenam corruptionem caelesti incorruptione mutantium, quos iam diuinitatis honore claros, conregnaturos ipse deo patri tradet in regnum dominus noster Iesus Christus, qui est benedictus in saecula saeculorum. amen.
And the very words with which the psalm closes speak thus: "Yet the righteous will confess to your name, and the upright will dwell with your face." The confession of the righteous can also seem bodily, since many, though still placed in the flesh, confess to the name of God. But the upright dwelling with the face of God are understood to retain nothing bodily in themselves. For the nature of flesh cannot bear the sight of God, as he himself says: "No man will see my face and live." This belongs to the heavenly, the transformed, those changing earthly corruption for heavenly incorruption, whom, now bright with the honor of divinity and about to reign with him, our Lord Jesus Christ will hand over to God the Father into the kingdom, he who is blessed for ever and ever. Amen.
Tractates 140
140.1CSEL 22:789
Omnium sanctorum fidelis oratio clamor est deo; fide enim ad eum, non uocis clamore clamatur. Moyses instante Aegyptiorum rege maestus stabat in littore; sed tacente licet eo excelsae mentis fidelem orationem dominus audiuit dicens: quid proclamas ad me? martyrum quoque sanguis uoce corporis caret; sed indignitas necis eorum deo clamor est ipso domino de Abel ad Cain dicente: uox sanguinis fratris tui clamat ad me. sic et sub ara dei martyrum animae proclamare scribuntur magna uoce dicentes: quousque dominus sanctus et uerus non iudicas et uindicas sanguinem nostrum de habitantibus in terra? si igitur non humilia nec terrena nec corporalia fidei spiritu oremus, tacens licet oratio nostra deo clamor est. atque ideo propheta totus ad deum spiritu orationis intentus ita coepit: domine clamaui ad te, exaudi me. et ut clamorem istum non uocis, sed fidei doceret esse, adiecit: intende uoci orationis meae, dum clamabo ad te. clamor etiam inuitis nobis penetrat in auditum ac se sponte in aures nostras ui contentae uocis inmittit. sed quia propheta non tali clamore clamat, orat, ut clamante se deus in uocem orationis intendat: per id namque, quod intenditur, fidei inspectio est, non clamoris auditio. id enim, quod interius est, intenditur: ceterum clamorem corporalem intendi non necesse est, per semetipsum omnem sensum aurium occupantem.
The faithful prayer of all the saints is a cry to God; for one cries to him by faith, not by the shouting of the voice. Moses stood sorrowful on the shore as the king of the Egyptians pressed on; but though he was silent, the Lord heard the faithful prayer of his lofty mind, saying: "Why do you cry out to me?" The blood of the martyrs too lacks the voice of the body; but the outrage of their death is a cry to God, as the Lord himself says of Abel to Cain: "The voice of your brother's blood cries out to me." So too beneath God's altar the souls of the martyrs are written to cry out with a loud voice, saying: "How long, O holy and true Lord, do you not judge and avenge our blood on those who dwell on the earth?" If, then, we pray by the spirit of faith for nothing lowly, earthly, or bodily, our prayer, though silent, is a cry to God. And therefore the prophet, wholly intent on God in the spirit of prayer, began thus: "O Lord, I have cried to you; hear me." And to teach that this cry is not of the voice but of faith, he added: "Attend to the voice of my prayer when I cry to you." A cry penetrates our hearing even against our will and sends itself into our ears of its own accord by the force of a strained voice. But since the prophet does not cry with such a cry, he prays that, as he cries, God may attend to the voice of his prayer: for through attending there is an examination of faith, not a hearing of a cry. For what is inward is attended to; but a bodily cry need not be attended to, since of itself it occupies the whole sense of the ears.
140.2CSEL 22:789–790
Dehinc sequitur: dirigatur oratio mea sicut incensum in conspectu tuo, domine. quorum pura et recta et sinceris oratio est, hi poterunt dicere: dirigatur oratio mea; ceterum si externarum cogitationum interuentu deprauabitur, non dirigetur. sed quod ait: dirigatur ut incensum, intellegendum est, quid sibi uelit conparatio proposita incensi. et primum natura incensi ea est, ut in altum se de humilibus extollat spirans optime et se nobis in sensum suaueolentise inmittens. hinc ex quattuor odoratissimis generibus in maximam subtilitatem comminutis conparatur: stacte, onyche, galbano, ture; quse omnia haec in formam orationum fidelium constituta esse beati Iohannis Apocalypsis ostendit, cum ait: et illi quidem uiginti quattuor seniores prociderunt ante agnum, habentes quisque citharam et phialas aureas plenas odoribus, qui sunt orationes sanctorum. quattuor autem genera orationum apostolus esse significat ad Timotheum scribens: exhortare ergo primo omnium fieri precationes, orationes, postulationes, gratiarum actiones. humilitatis nostrae est deprecari, magnificentise dei est orari, fidei est postulare, confessionis et laudis est gratulari. et forte quattuor illa genera odorum ad unum thymiama ex partibus subtilissimis conparata singulis quoque generibus poterint consummandse orationis aptari. quamquam speciem quoque quattuor elementorum horum quattuor odorum natura et species significare uideatur, ut tus, quod perlucidissimum est, spiritui conparetur, stacte uero aquis, galbanum et onyx terrae atque igni: ut per haec omnium, qui in caelo et infra caelum et in terra et in aquis sint, placita deo incensi modo haec efferatur laudis oratio. sed haec his, quos profundioris scientiae cognitio delectat, relinquamus: nobis sufficit prophetica atque apostolica auctoritas, quae et incensum orationes esse significat et orationes deprecatur dirigi ut incensum.
Then follows: "Let my prayer be directed like incense in your sight, O Lord." Those whose prayer is pure, upright, and sincere will be able to say, "Let my prayer be directed"; but if it is distorted by the intrusion of outside thoughts, it will not be directed. But in his saying, "Let it be directed like incense," we must understand what the comparison of incense set forth means. First, the nature of incense is such that it rises up from below on high, breathing most sweetly and sending itself into our sense with a sweet fragrance. It is compounded from four most fragrant kinds, ground very fine: stacte, onycha, galbanum, frankincense; and that all these were constituted as a figure of the prayers of the faithful the Apocalypse of blessed John shows, when it says: "And those twenty-four elders fell down before the Lamb, each having a harp and golden bowls full of incense, which are the prayers of the saints." And the apostle signifies that there are four kinds of prayers, writing to Timothy: "I urge, then, first of all that supplications, prayers, petitions, and thanksgivings be made." To entreat belongs to our humility, to be prayed to belongs to God's majesty, to petition belongs to faith, to give thanks belongs to confession and praise. And perhaps those four kinds of fragrances, compounded from the finest parts into one incense, may be fitted to the several kinds of a complete prayer. And yet the nature and form of these four fragrances seem also to signify the form of the four elements: so that frankincense, which is most translucent, may be compared to air, stacte to water, galbanum and onycha to earth and fire; so that through these this prayer of praise, pleasing to God, may be carried up like incense from all that are in heaven and beneath heaven and on earth and in the waters. But let us leave these things to those who delight in knowledge of a deeper learning: for us the prophetic and apostolic authority suffices, which both signifies that incense is prayers and prays that prayers be directed like incense.
140.3CSEL 22:790–791
Sed qui deprecatus est orationem suam dirigi ut incensum, etiam illud post haec ait: alleuatio manuum mearum sacrificium uespertinum. plurimis locis tractauimus in alleuatione manuum excelsi operis officium monstrari, ut, cum Moyses eleuatis manibus stare praeceptus est, populo in alleuatione et demissione manuum suarum uel uictore uel uicto. apostolus quoque orantes iubet eleuare manus puras. et cum ait: sine ira et cogitatione, non habitum orandi constituit, sed praescriptum diuinse operationis adiecit. denique dominus per Esaiam prophetam orationes impiorum inprobans ita locutus est: si extendatis manus, auertam oculos meos a uobis, non utique si eleuetis, sed si extendatis; quia habitus orandi in manibus extendendis est, perfecti autem operis efficientia est in eleuandis.
But he who prayed that his prayer be directed like incense also says after this: "The lifting up of my hands is an evening sacrifice." We have treated in very many places that in the lifting up of the hands the duty of lofty work is shown, as when Moses was commanded to stand with hands raised, the people being either victorious or defeated as his hands were raised or lowered. The apostle too commands those who pray to lift up pure hands. And when he says "without anger and disputing," he does not fix a posture for praying, but adds a prescription of divine work. Finally, the Lord, rejecting the prayers of the impious through the prophet Isaiah, spoke thus: "If you stretch out your hands, I will turn my eyes away from you": certainly not if you lift them up, but if you stretch them out; because the posture of praying lies in stretching out the hands, but the effecting of perfect work lies in lifting them up.
140.4CSEL 22:791
Manuum ergo eleuatio sacrificium uespertinum est. non enim sanguine et holocaustis nos, in quos consummatio saeculorum deuenit, sacrificamus deo. sed quod sacrificium uespertinum placitum sit, audiamus dominum in euangeliis dicentem: uenite, benedicti patris mei, possidete praeparatum uobis regnum a constitutione mundi. esuriui enim, et dedistis mihi manducare; sitiui, et dedistis mihi bibere; hospes eram, et suscepistis me; infirmus, et uisitastis me; in carcere fui, et liberastis me. et respondentibus illis, quod numquam his officiis humanse necessitatis eguisset, ait: amen dico uobis, quamdiu fecistis uni ex his fratribus minimis, mihi fecistis. hoc sacrificium uespertinum, id est temporum nouissimorum est. in hoc manus eleuandae sunt, quia istius modi orationibus iam ab initio mundi benedictis dei regni caelestis praeparata possessio est.
The lifting up of the hands, then, is an evening sacrifice. For we, upon whom the end of the ages has come, do not sacrifice to God with blood and burnt offerings. But what evening sacrifice is pleasing, let us hear the Lord saying in the Gospels: "Come, you blessed of my Father, possess the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world. For I was hungry, and you gave me to eat; I was thirsty, and you gave me to drink; I was a stranger, and you took me in; sick, and you visited me; I was in prison, and you freed me." And when they answered that he had never needed these services of human necessity, he says: "Amen I say to you, as long as you did it to one of these least brothers, you did it to me." This is the evening sacrifice, that is, of the last times. In this the hands are to be lifted up, because by prayers of this kind the possession of the heavenly kingdom has been prepared from the beginning of the world for those blessed by God.
140.5CSEL 22:791–792
Sed meminit propheta, praeter clamorem fidei, praeter orationem, quse dirigenda sit ut incensum, et praeter eleuationem manuum, in qua sacrificium uespertinum est, et aliud sibi adhuc opus consummandse in se iustificationis optandum. dicti scilicet huius euangelici memor: ex uerbis tuis iustificaberis, aut ex uerbis tuis condemnaberis, recolens quoque ex omni se uerbo otioso rationem in die iudicii redditurum necessario deprecatus est dicens: pone, domine, custodiam ori meo et ostium circumstantise labiis meis. non leuem custodiam ori suo orat adponi, ostium scilicet circumstantise, ut custodia illa non obseruatio sit aliqua, sed claustrum. periculosus enim ualde linguae et promptissimus lapsus est: et ex ea maledictum, mendacium, periurium, obtrectatio motu facili et aditu patenti efferuntur. oremus ergo nobis circumstantiae ostium. in eo enim libro, qui nobiscum Salomonis inscribitur, apud Graecos autem atque Hebrseos Sapientia Sirach habetur, ita monemur: ecce circumualla possessionem tuam spinis, argentum et aurum tuum constitue, et ori tuo fac ostium et seram, et uerbis tuis fac iugum et mensuram. et ostium et seram ori iussit adponi, ne uerbis esset facilis egressus. idem autem uerbis iugum mensuramque constituit, ut rationis iugo subdita, librata per mensuram moderatione penderent.
But the prophet remembers that besides the cry of faith, besides the prayer to be directed like incense, and besides the lifting up of the hands, in which is the evening sacrifice, there is yet another work to be desired for the completion of justification in him. Mindful, namely, of this Gospel saying, "By your words you will be justified, and by your words you will be condemned," and recalling that he will render account on the day of judgment for every idle word, he necessarily prayed, saying: "Set, O Lord, a guard on my mouth and a door of enclosure about my lips." He prays that no light guard be set on his mouth, namely a door of enclosure, so that that guard may be not some watching but a bar. For the slip of the tongue is very dangerous and very ready: and from it cursing, lying, perjury, and slander are carried out by easy motion and an open exit. Let us pray, then, for a door of enclosure. For in that book which among us is inscribed as Solomon's, but among the Greeks and Hebrews is held to be the Wisdom of Sirach, we are admonished thus: "Behold, hedge your possession with thorns, bind up your silver and gold, and make a door and a bolt for your mouth, and make a yoke and a measure for your words." He commanded both a door and a bolt to be set on the mouth, so that words might not have an easy exit. And the same set a yoke and measure for words, so that, subject to the yoke of reason, they might hang weighed by the moderation of measure.
140.6CSEL 22:792–793
Tendit adhuc propheta ad iustitise perfectionem. namque post fidei clamorem, post orationem, post opera, post ostium oris consummari se quoque officio cordis orat dicens: non declines cor meum in uerba mala, ad excusandas excusationes in peccatis cum hominibus operantibus iniquitatem. cum ex innocentise ac iustitiae studiis in uitiosam uoluntatem decidimus, tum cor nostrum in mala uerba declinat: non ut peccatum excusemus — omne enim peccatum inexcusabile est — sed ut excusationes excusemus. crimen enim caedis atque adulterii et talium ceterorum per naturam atque indignitatem facti inexcusabile est. sed qui in eo erit deprehensus, non dicet: adulterium aut caedes non habet crimen. sed dicet: mulier inportuna, incontinens, adblandiens pellexit et in uoluptatem coegit. uel alius ille dicet: conuiciis mouit iram, iniuriis armauit dolorem, casus litis caedem peregit. in haec uerba cor sese, postquam ab eo peccatum est, declinat, ut excusationes peccati, quod admisit, excuset. cor autem rectum atque purum in uerba excusationum non declinat, sed manet inuiolatum atque constans sine sollicitudine uerborum ad excusandas excusationes quaerendorum, cum uitse innocentia peccati excusatione non egeat. et haec quidem in corporalibus rebus ita sunt. in his uero, quse spiritalia existimantur, id est in haereseos doctrina, incredibile est quo cordis labore, qua uerborum exquisitione excusationes suas hseretici excusent. in quae omnia ne declinetur cor suum, iustus exposcit, ne per hanc declinati cordis ad excusandas excusationes necessitatem cum electis eorum conbinetur.
The prophet still stretches toward the perfection of righteousness. For after the cry of faith, after prayer, after works, after the door of the mouth, he prays to be completed also by the duty of the heart, saying: "Do not turn my heart aside to evil words, to make excuses in sins with men who work iniquity." When we fall from the pursuits of innocence and righteousness into a vicious will, then our heart turns aside to evil words: not so as to excuse the sin (for every sin is inexcusable), but so as to make excuses. For the crime of murder and adultery and others like them is inexcusable by the nature and outrage of the deed. But he who is caught in it will not say, "Adultery or murder is no crime"; but he will say, "An importunate, incontinent, flattering woman enticed me and forced me into pleasure." Or another will say, "He roused my anger with insults, armed my resentment with injuries; the chance of a quarrel brought about the killing." To these words the heart turns aside after it has sinned, so as to make excuses for the sin it has committed. But an upright and pure heart does not turn aside to words of excuses, but remains inviolate and constant, without anxiety about words to be sought for making excuses, since innocence of life has no need of excuse for sin. And these things are so in bodily matters. But in what are thought to be spiritual matters, that is, in the teaching of heresy, it is incredible with what labor of heart, with what searching for words, heretics make their excuses. The righteous man asks that his heart may not turn aside to all these things, lest through this necessity of a heart turned aside to making excuses he be paired with their chosen ones.
140.7CSEL 22:793–794
Et non conbinabo, inquit, cum electis eorum. conbinari cum electis iniquorum non uult propheta. meminit enim numerum hunc rebus inmundis deputatum, cum ad Noe de recondendis in arca animalibus constituitur praeceptum: a pecoribus autem mundis induces ad te septem et septem et a pecoribus inmundis bina et bina. est et maius adhuc et absolutius inutilis huius numeri exemplum. dominus enim noster Iesus Christus omnes inmunditias nostras et peccata auferens fecit secundum apostolum utrumque unum, et secundum eundem, ut duos conderet in se in unum nouum hominem, faciens pacem, ut reconciliaret ambos deo in uno corpore, internum scilicet hominem et externum fecit unum. non ergo conbinamur, sed unimur: quia unitas fidei est, at uero conbinatio consortium factionis.
"And I will not be paired," he says, "with their chosen ones." The prophet does not want to be paired with the chosen of the wicked. For he remembers that this number was assigned to unclean things, when the command was given to Noah about storing the animals in the ark: "But of clean cattle you shall bring in to yourself seven and seven, and of unclean cattle two and two." There is an even greater and more complete example of this useless number. For our Lord Jesus Christ, taking away all our uncleanness and sins, according to the apostle "made both one," and according to the same, "that he might create in himself the two into one new man, making peace, that he might reconcile both to God in one body": he made the inner man and the outer one. We are not, then, paired, but united: because faith is unity, but pairing is the fellowship of a faction.
140.8CSEL 22:794–795
Non modo autem non conbinari se propheta cum electis iniquorum non optat, sed etiam, quia homini errare debitum est, si quid forte secus et humanitus gesserit, corripi se a iusto in misericordia et argui mauult. formam namque in se naturae nostrae infirmitatisque constituit. plures etenim nostrum, cum lapsi fuerint, cum errauerint, emendari se iustae misericordiae arguitione fastidiunt et conbinari malunt peccatoribus quam per iustorum correptionem ad paenitentiam retorqueri. tenuit autem egregie rationem ueri propheticus sermo dicens: corripiet me iustus in misericordia et increpabit me. est enim misericordise modus, et miserandi adhibenda iustitia est. dolor quidem potest esse erga eos, quorum crimina grauia sunt, sed misericordiae locus nullus est. misericordia enim se ad ueniam de deo orandam his, quae sunt gesta, deflectit: ceterum ueniam praestare inlicitis non est misericordiam praestare, sed iustitiam misericordise non tenere. quam rationem diligentissime apostolus Iohannes retinuit dicens: si quis scit fratrem suum delinquere, sed non ad mortem, petat et dabit illi deus uitam. est enim peccatum ad mortem, sed non pro eo dico. quod autem in misericordia iustus corripere atque arguere eum, qui lapsus sit, debeat, beatus Paulus docet dicens: fratres, et si prseuentus fuerit homo in aliquo delicto, uos, qui estis spiritales, consummate eum in spiritu lenitatis. sed ne ipse quidem rationis iustae misericordiae inmemor fuit: prseuentum enim in delicto, non uoluntate delinquentem consummari per arguitionem iubet. atque ideo propheta, cum ait: corripiet me iustus in misericordia et increpabit me, et fidei suae et humanae infirmitatis memor corripiendum se in his ait, quse iustae misericordise arguitione sunt digna.
And not only does the prophet wish not to be paired with the chosen of the wicked, but, since it is man's lot to err, if perhaps he has done anything amiss and humanly, he prefers to be corrected and reproved by the righteous man in mercy. For he sets up in himself a form of our nature and weakness. For many of us, when we have fallen, when we have erred, disdain to be amended by the reproof of righteous mercy and prefer to be paired with sinners rather than be turned back to repentance through the correction of the righteous. The prophetic speech has excellently kept the reasoning of truth, saying: "The righteous man will correct me in mercy and rebuke me." For mercy has a measure, and justice must be applied in showing mercy. There can indeed be grief toward those whose crimes are grave, but there is no place for mercy. For mercy turns itself to asking God's pardon for what has been done; but to grant pardon for the unlawful is not to show mercy but not to keep the justice of mercy. This reasoning the apostle John most carefully kept, saying: "If anyone knows that his brother is sinning, but not unto death, let him ask, and God will give him life. For there is a sin unto death; I do not say for that." And that the righteous man ought to correct and reprove in mercy one who has fallen, blessed Paul teaches, saying: "Brothers, even if a man is overtaken in some fault, you who are spiritual restore him in a spirit of gentleness." But not even he was unmindful of the reasoning of just mercy: for he commands that one overtaken in a fault, not one who offends willfully, be restored through reproof. And therefore the prophet, when he says, "The righteous man will correct me in mercy and rebuke me," mindful both of his faith and of human weakness, says he must be corrected in those things that deserve the reproof of just mercy.
140.9CSEL 22:795
Orat autem adhuc et aliud, ne doctrinis uidelicet peccatorum imbuatur neue usque ad peccantium misericordiam decidat: oleum autem peccatoris non inpinguet caput meum. uult eum, qui nos doceat atque arguat, conscientise purae esse. dominus uero in euangeliis, cum de ieiuniorum puritate loqueretur, ait: uos autem cum ieiunatis, unguite caput uestrum et faciem uestram lauate. in abluenda facie nitorem purae conscientise exegit, ne quid nobis sordidum, ne quid oblitum adhaereret; in capite uero unguendo doctrinis nos atque operibus spiritalis institutionis perfectos esse prsecepit. oleum enim luminis pabulum est; et doctrina atque opus spiritale caelestis nobis gloriae causa est. ut enim lumen ex oleo luminis habet causam: ita, ut lucem spiritalis gloriae retineamus, doctrina atque opus praestat. cum caput nostrum, sedis scilicet uitse et prudentise et omnium sensuum oleo operationis doctrinaeque pinguescat. sed oleum non a peccatore sumendum est; et orandus est deus, ne hoc peccator infundat. ut enim a sancto et fideli uiro argui se uelle prudentis est, quia segris animis et peccatorum morbo languentibus utilis est seuerae obiurgationis sub honesto auctore medicina: ita miserum est per peccati miserationem usque ad ipsam peccantium misericordiam decidisse. hoc ergo utrumque a se detestatur propheta.
He prays further for another thing, namely that he not be imbued with the teachings of sinners nor fall so far as mercy toward sinners: "But let the oil of the sinner not anoint my head." He wants the one who teaches and reproves us to be of a pure conscience. The Lord in the Gospels, speaking of the purity of fasts, says: "But you, when you fast, anoint your head and wash your face." In washing the face he required the brightness of a pure conscience, so that nothing dirty, nothing smeared might cling to us; in anointing the head he commanded us to be perfect in the teachings and works of spiritual instruction. For oil is the food of light; and spiritual teaching and work are the cause of heavenly glory for us. For as light has its cause from the oil of the lamp, so teaching and work enable us to keep the light of spiritual glory, when our head, the seat of life, prudence, and all the senses, is enriched with the oil of working and teaching. But the oil is not to be taken from a sinner; and God must be prayed to, lest a sinner pour it on. For as it is prudent to wish to be reproved by a holy and faithful man, because the medicine of severe rebuke from an honorable author is useful to sick souls languishing with the disease of sins, so it is wretched to have fallen, through pity for sin, as far as mercy toward sinners themselves. The prophet, then, detests both of these.
140.10CSEL 22:795–796
Sequitur deinde: quoniam adhuc et oratio mea in beneplacitis eorum, absorti sunt continuati petrae iudices eorum. causam, cur absorbeantur continuati petrae, dicit eam, quia adhuc sit oratio sua in beneplacitis eorum. orat propheta eadem, quae superiora sunt, ne oleum peccatoris caput suum inpinguet. hoc propheta orat. sed peccatores ne hac quidem prophetae oratione terrentur, ut ab his, quae sibi placita sunt, desistant. nemo enim in peccatis nisi, quia his delectatur, perseuerat: et causam in unaquaque re permanendi uoluptatis oblectatio subministrat. ergo quia adhuc orante eo in beneplacitis eorum sunt, id est, quia quod erant, non demutatur per eos uoluptate peccandi et peccatores esse persistunt. nec oratio eius finem accipit: quia tamdiu in beneplacitis istorum eius oratio est, quamdiu illis beneplacitum sit non peccare.
Then follows: "For still my prayer is in their good pleasures; their judges, joined to the rock, have been swallowed up." He gives the reason why they are swallowed up, joined to the rock: because his prayer is still in their good pleasures. The prophet prays the same things as above, that the oil of the sinner may not anoint his head. This the prophet prays. But the sinners are not frightened even by this prayer of the prophet to desist from what pleases them. For no one perseveres in sins except because he delights in them; and the delight of pleasure supplies the reason for remaining in each thing. Since, then, while he is still praying, they are in their good pleasures, that is, since what they were is not changed by them through the pleasure of sinning, and they persist in being sinners, his prayer too receives no end: because his prayer is in their good pleasures as long as it pleases them not to sin.
140.11CSEL 22:796–797
Idcirco absorti sunt continuati petrse iudices eorum. petram non nouimus nisi Christum et quia dictum est de eo: petra autem erat Christus. quo adueniente, cum se hi peccatorum electi et iudices ipsi continuabunt, absorbebuntur. mors enim tunc et corruptio et peccatum absorbebitur, ut scriptum est: absorpta est mors in contentionem. ubi est mors aculeus tuus? ubi est contentio? aculeus enim mortis peccatum. absorbentur autem continuati petrae horum iudices cum illo suo principe, de quo dictum est: et tunc reuelabitur ille impius, quem dominus Iesus interficiet spiritu oris sui et euacuabit eum praesentia aduentus sui. per hanc ergo aduentus domini praesentiam euacuabuntur absorpti et absorpti iudicio sanctorum. sequitur enim: audient uerba mea, quia potuerunt. potuerunt uel absorbere uel audiri. in praesentia enim domini absorbentur propheticae ueritatis arguitione et impise suae falsitatis obprobrio.
Therefore their judges, joined to the rock, have been swallowed up. We know no rock but Christ, since it is said of him: "And the rock was Christ." At his coming, when these chosen ones and judges of sinners are joined to him, they will be swallowed up. For then death and corruption and sin will be swallowed up, as it is written: "Death has been swallowed up in victory. Where, O death, is your sting? Where is your victory? For the sting of death is sin." Their judges, joined to the rock, are swallowed up together with their prince, of whom it is said: "And then that wicked one will be revealed, whom the Lord Jesus will slay with the breath of his mouth and destroy by the presence of his coming." Through this presence of the Lord's coming, then, they will be destroyed, swallowed up, and swallowed up by the judgment of the saints. For there follows: "They will hear my words, for they have prevailed." They have prevailed either to swallow up or to be heard. For in the presence of the Lord they are swallowed up by the reproof of prophetic truth and the disgrace of their impious falsehood.
140.12CSEL 22:797
Neque solum audient uerba, quae possunt, sed etiam id, quod sequitur, his accidet: tamquam crassitudo terrae eruptum est super terram. quod autem crassitudo impietatis et uitiorum aut comes sit aut causa, propheta testatur dicens: incrassatum est cor populi huius. sed et Moyses inreligiositatem populi insolentis pronuntians ait: manducauit et bibit Iacob et repletus est et incrassatus est et calcitrauit dilectus. uirtutem dicti huius ex ipsa terrae natura absolutius intellegemus. namque scimus crassiores pinguioresque terras in eas scrobes, e quibus effossse sunt, ex solido non redire, quia erumpente earum crassitudine rursum ipsarum sunt incapaces. itaque secundum id, quod ait: tamquam crassitudo terrae eruptum est super terram, docuit exemplo, quia omnis terrae nostrae, id est corporis crassitudo ex naturae suae lege uitiis effossa erumpit et capax sui non est, in perniciem suam, ne in se reformari possit, exsestuans.
And not only will they hear the words that prevail, but this too, which follows, will happen to them: "As the thickness of the earth it has broken out upon the earth." That thickness is either the companion or the cause of impiety and vices the prophet testifies, saying: "The heart of this people has been made thick." And Moses too, proclaiming the irreligion of an insolent people, says: "Jacob ate and drank and was filled and grew thick, and the beloved kicked." We shall understand the force of this saying more completely from the very nature of earth. For we know that thicker and richer soils do not go back solidly into the pits from which they were dug, because, their thickness breaking out, they can no longer be contained in them. So, according to the saying, "As the thickness of the earth it has broken out upon the earth," he taught by example that all the thickness of our earth, that is, of the body, dug out by vices from the law of its nature, breaks out and cannot contain itself, boiling over to its own ruin so that it cannot be restored within itself.
140.13CSEL 22:797
Erumpente autem hac crassitudine super se habet maerorem propheta dicens: dissipata sunt ossa nostra secus infernum. se dissipari, se dispergi, se secus infernum abigi in peccatorum calamitate existimat. si enim unum membrum conpatitur, conpatiuntur et omnia membra. omnes enim inuicem unius corporis membra sumus, ut et in altero psalmo ait: dispersa sunt omnia ossa mea, non utique ea ossa, per quae corpus nostrum in hanc firmitatem uirtutis suae continetur; sed quia omnes unum corpus sumus et inuicem membra sumus, corporis nostri ossa sunt ceteri.
As this thickness breaks out, the prophet grieves over himself, saying: "Our bones have been scattered beside hell." He thinks that he himself is scattered, dispersed, driven beside hell in the calamity of sinners. For if one member suffers, all the members suffer with it. For we are all members of one body, one of another, as he says in another psalm too: "All my bones have been scattered": certainly not those bones by which our body is held in this firmness of its strength; but since we are all one body and members of one another, the others are the bones of our body.
140.14CSEL 22:797–798
Vellet potius non erumpere crassitudinem terrae eorum neque dissipari ossa secus infernum, sed omnes magis hac, quse consequitur, uoce uti: quia ad te, domine, oculi mei: in te speraui, non auferas animam meam. custodi me a laqueo, quod statuerunt mihi, et a scandalis operantium iniquitatem. intenti prophetae ad deum oculi non deflectuntur in aliquas superfluarum rerum admirationes, non ad contumeliam pudicitise honestas humanorum corporum species contuentur, non capiuntur aut pretiosarum uestium opere, aut blando argenti nitore, aut inlecebroso fulgore auri, aut inani honore gemmarum, aut factioso spectaculi theatralis certamine, aut ambitiosa potestatum saecularium pompa, sed in omnia magnifica dei opera, ad admirationem eius, qui ea est operatus, intendunt. neque solum oculis, sed etiam mente semper intentus est dicens: in te speraui, non auferas animam meam. ablatio animae non abolitio eius est: sed cum a gloria constituti sibi honoris aufertur, cum ab expectatione et effectu spei suae decidit.
He would rather that the thickness of their earth not break out nor the bones be scattered beside hell, but that all should rather use this voice which follows: "For to you, O Lord, are my eyes; in you I have hoped; do not take away my soul. Guard me from the snare which they have set for me, and from the stumbling blocks of those who work iniquity." The prophet's eyes, intent on God, are not turned aside to any admiration of superfluous things; they do not look at the comely forms of human bodies to the affront of chastity; they are not captured by the workmanship of precious garments, or the smooth gleam of silver, or the enticing glitter of gold, or the empty honor of gems, or the factious contest of the theatrical show, or the ambitious pomp of worldly powers; but they are intent on all the magnificent works of God, to the admiration of him who made them. And he is always intent not only with the eyes but also with the mind, saying: "In you I have hoped; do not take away my soul." The taking away of the soul is not its abolition, but when it is taken away from the glory of the honor appointed for it, when it falls from the expectation and fulfilment of its hope.
140.15CSEL 22:798–799
Multa autem spei suae pericula non ignorat esse, cum ait: custodi me a laqueo, quod statuerunt mihi, et a scandalis operantium iniquitatem. ubique laquei, ubique sunt scandala, mundus omnis plenus insidiis est, siue per principem aeris huius, siue per spiritales uirtutes in caelestibus, siue per filios inoboedientise, in quibus spiritus erroris operatur. habemus enim laqueos in hominibus malae adhortationis, periculosi exempli et elicitae necessitatis, cum nos ad uoluptates adhortantur, cum in prosperis rebus suis in deum impii sunt, cum per contumelias et iniurias ad motum nos turbulentse uoluntatis exagitant. differt autem laqueus a scandalo. laqueus enim est adhortatio uoluptatum et incentiuum adpetitionis inhonestse, quod modo laquei fallens capit. scandalum autem est uxor inreligiosa, filius inicus et cetera deinceps domi nomina et omnis ex ecclesia frater aut contumeliosus aut auarus aut ebriosus aut turpis. in his enim nobis est scandalum, quotiensque ad necessitatem irascendi, arguendi, inhibendi, uindicandi ex illa quietae fidei nostrae mansuetudine prouocamur.
He is not unaware that there are many dangers to his hope, when he says: "Guard me from the snare which they have set for me, and from the stumbling blocks of those who work iniquity." Everywhere are snares, everywhere stumbling blocks; the whole world is full of ambushes, whether through the prince of this air, or through the spiritual powers in the heavenly places, or through the sons of disobedience, in whom the spirit of error works. For we have snares in men of evil exhortation, dangerous example, and drawn-out necessity, when they urge us to pleasures, when in their prosperity they are impious toward God, when by insults and injuries they stir us to the motion of a turbulent will. But a snare differs from a stumbling block. For a snare is the exhortation to pleasures and the incitement of dishonorable appetite, which deceives and captures like a snare. But a stumbling block is an irreligious wife, a wicked son, and the other names in the household, and every brother from the church who is insolent or greedy or drunken or base. For in these there is a stumbling block for us whenever we are provoked out of the meekness of our quiet faith to the necessity of being angry, reproving, restraining, punishing.
140.16CSEL 22:799
Nouit autem unum, qui per omnes iniquitatem operantes ipse potius in his laqueis semper operetur, dicens: cadent in retiaculo eius peccatores: eius scilicet, qui operatur in plurimis. quidquid enim iniquitatum homines gerunt, a diabolo suggeritur; quem nunc sub singulari numero demonstrat, cum superius sub plurali ministeria eius significasset in plurimis. plures in eo et eum significat in pluribus: atque ideo iniqui laqueos prsetendunt et in retiaculo eius cadent peccatores, quia iniqui retiaculi sui laqueos praetendunt. cadent autem peccatores, non tunc peccatores, cum ceciderint, effecti, sed cadentes ob id, quia peccatores sunt; captioni retiaculi effecti per id, quod peccatores sunt, oportuni.
But he knows one who himself rather is always at work in these snares through all who work iniquity, saying: "Sinners will fall into his net": his, namely, who works in very many. For whatever iniquities men commit are suggested by the devil; whom he now shows in the singular number, having signified above in the plural his ministers in very many. He signifies many in him and him in many: and therefore the wicked set out snares and sinners will fall into his net, because the wicked set out the snares of his net. And sinners will fall, not made sinners at the moment they fall, but falling because they are sinners; made ready for the capture of the net through being sinners.
140.17CSEL 22:799
Propheta autem per spem suam ac fidem tutus confidenter de se ait: singulariter sum ego, donec transeam. scit impiam esse, ut supra ostendimus, conbinationem. deo autem deditus, nullis aliis saeculi negotiis occupatus est et singularis, donec transeat. et quid est illud, quod transeat? scandala scilicet et retiacula et laqueos. et quo transeat, quaerendum est. nempe eo, quo dictum est; fidelis enim et sanctus et uerus est, qui ait: qui autem credit in me, non iudicabitur, sed transiet de morte in uitam, dominus noster Iesus Christus, qui est benedictus in saecula saeculorum. amen.
But the prophet, safe through his hope and faith, says confidently of himself: "I am alone until I pass over." He knows, as we showed above, that pairing is impious. Devoted to God, he is occupied with no other business of the world and is alone until he passes over. And what is it that he passes over? The stumbling blocks, namely, and nets and snares. And where he passes to, we must ask. Surely to where it is said; for faithful and holy and true is he who says: "But he who believes in me will not be judged, but will pass from death into life," our Lord Jesus Christ, who is blessed for ever and ever. Amen.
Tractates 141
141.1CSEL 22:799–800
Psalmi ratio titulo continetur, sed spiritali potius quam corporali intellegentia; et ideo in titulo intellectus oratio est. nam si simplex secundum Dauid gesta sensus esset, oratio tantum psalmi titulo fuisset inscripta. sed quia ad orationis cognitionem spiritali intellegentia opus esset, idcirco intellectus oratio, quia sit intellegenda, prsescribitur. scimus enim esse et illum Dauid, cuius tabernaculum, quod ceciderat, excitatum est, iustum, orientem, regnantem, id est dominum nostrum, dei filium, qui frequenter fugerit, frequenter latuerit, frequenter orauerit, in ipso quoque tempore passionis et fleuerit et ad deum in tribulatione clamauerit, non ob naturalem quasi passionis metum, sed adfectum hominis, quem gerebat, ostendens: ut per hanc orationem et filius dei, ad quem oraret, et ipse non simulatus homo, sed uerus posset intellegi. eius itaque esse haec intellegitur oratio. Dauid quidem in spelunca loquitur, sed prophetat in Christo. Dauid fugit, sed fugam domini sui non tam per uerba quam per fugam prophetat. Dauid spiritu defecit, sed et domino tristis est anima usque ad mortem. Dauid semitas deus cognoscit, sed et filium nemo nouit nisi pater. Dauid in fidei suae uiis laquei absconsi sunt, domino quoque in prsedicationis suae cursu ubique parantur insidise. hic in spelunca orat, ille orat in corpore. seruus dominum prophetat Christum, Dauid iste illum Dauid omnium passionum prophetat exemplo. atque ideo haec non tam Dauid de se ipso, quam de domino per Dauid dicta intellegetur oratio.
The meaning of the psalm is contained in its title, but in a spiritual rather than a bodily understanding; and therefore the title has "a prayer of understanding." For if the sense were simple, according to David's deeds, only "a prayer" would have been inscribed in the title of the psalm. But since spiritual understanding was needed to know the prayer, it is headed "a prayer of understanding," because it is to be understood. For we know there is also that David whose tabernacle, which had fallen, was raised up, the righteous, the rising, the reigning one, that is, our Lord, the Son of God, who often fled, often hid, often prayed, and in the very time of the passion both wept and cried to God in tribulation, not from a kind of natural fear of suffering, but showing the feeling of the man he bore: so that through this prayer he might be understood both as Son of God, to whom he prayed, and himself not a feigned man but a true one. This prayer, then, is understood to be his. David indeed speaks in a cave, but he prophesies in Christ. David flees, but he prophesies the flight of his Lord not so much by words as by flight. David's spirit fails, but the Lord's soul too is sorrowful unto death. God knows David's paths, but no one knows the Son either except the Father. Snares are hidden in the ways of David's faith; for the Lord too, in the course of his preaching, ambushes are prepared everywhere. This one prays in a cave, that one prays in the body. The servant prophesies Christ the Lord; this David prophesies that David by the example of all his sufferings. And therefore this prayer will be understood as spoken not so much by David about himself as about the Lord through David.
141.2CSEL 22:800–801
Voce mea ad dominum clamaui, uoce mea ad dominum deprecatus sum. effundo in conspectu eius orationem meam et tribulationem meam ante ipsum pronuntio. in deficiendo ex me spiritum meum. egregie uerborum ordo dispositus est. primum uoce clamatur; omnis enim fidelis uiri etiam tacita et spiritalis expectatio deo clamor est. deinde uoce oratur, id est desiderii et fidei petitio uerbis uocis effertur secundum illud apostoli: psallam spiritu, psallam et uoce. tertio in conspectu dei oratio effunditur, non uerbis scilicet de lingua excidentibus, sed de profundo et interno fidei fonte oratio precantis effunditur; et effunditur in conspectu dei, non neglegenter neque ex securitate, sed tamquam domino praesente; qui enim oratur ut exaudiat, praesens necesse est esse credatur; qui autem praesens existimatur, non absentis dissimulatione, sed praesentis honore reuerendus est. quarto quoque tribulationem suam pronuntiat. non inpeditur, cum tribulatur, quin semper ad deum omnium angustiarum suarum et passionum molestias referat. neque sane leues tribulationes sunt, quas ante deum effusa oratione pronuntiat, sed in eo, cum deficit ab eo spiritus suus. at uero nos lenes tantum temptationes ab assiduitate orationis inpediunt et quantulamcumque in secundis modo rebus animi nostri constantiam a deuotionis officio repentinus exiguae difficultatis motus auertit. at uero hic ne deficiente quidem spiritu suo cessat et tribulationem suam pronuntiare et orationem effundere et uoce orare et ipsa spiritalis fidei uoce clamare.
"With my voice I cried to the Lord; with my voice I made entreaty to the Lord. I pour out my prayer in his sight and declare my tribulation before him, while my spirit fails from me." The order of the words has been excellently arranged. First one cries with the voice; for every expectation of a faithful man, even silent and spiritual, is a cry to God. Then one prays with the voice, that is, the petition of desire and faith is brought out in the words of the voice, according to that saying of the apostle: "I will sing with the spirit, I will sing with the voice also." Third, the prayer is poured out in the sight of God, not with words falling from the tongue but the prayer of the one who prays is poured out from the deep and inner spring of faith; and it is poured out in God's sight, not carelessly or from security, but as before the Lord present; for he who is asked to hear must be believed present; and he who is thought present is to be revered not with the indifference shown to one absent but with the honor due to one present. Fourth, he also declares his tribulation. He is not hindered, when he is in tribulation, from always referring to God the troubles of all his straits and sufferings. Nor indeed are they light tribulations that he declares before God, having poured out his prayer, but in this, that his spirit fails him. But even light temptations hinder us from constancy in prayer, and the sudden motion of a slight difficulty turns away from the duty of devotion whatever little constancy of mind we have in prosperity. But he, not even when his spirit fails, ceases to declare his tribulation, to pour out his prayer, to pray with the voice, and to cry with the very voice of spiritual faith.
141.3CSEL 22:801–802
Tu cognouisti semitas meas. in uia hac, qua ambulabam, absconderunt laqueos mihi. haec tam illius, quam huius Dauid oratio esse poterit existimari: quia, ut diximus, omnia domini dicta atque gesta et serui fide et prophetae praefigurauit exemplo. numquam uero psalmorum prophetia, quotiensque ex persona domini profertur, non aliquid peculiare eius ac proprium, quod alii cum eo commune esse non possit, adiecit: ut, quia multa ex persona eius hominis, quem adsumpsit, commemorata personis hominum essent naturisque communia, psalmi potius de eo prophetia ea, quae proprie ex persona eius dicerentur, ostenderet; ut illud nunc: considerabam ad dexteram et uidebam, quia non est, qui cognoscat me. perit fuga a me: et non est, qui requirat animam meam. Dauid enim, licet fugeret, non tamen incognitus erat; neque solum ad dexteram contuebatur, sed etiam ad sinistram ei conspectus patebat. illud autem quomodo personse eius aptabitur: perit fuga a me, dehinc illud: et non est, qui requirat animam meam, postremo etiam illud, quo psalmus concluditur: me expectant iusti, donec retribuas mihi? contraria sibi ista sunt ex persona hominis intellecta. si enim sunt iusti expectantes, quomodo nemo cognoscit? quomodo nemo animam requirit? per id enim nemo animam requirit et nemo cognoscit, quia respiciente eo a dextris nemo iustus est uisus.
"You have known my paths. In this way in which I walked they have hidden snares for me." This can be thought the prayer as much of that David as of this one: because, as we said, he prefigured all the Lord's words and deeds by the faith of a servant and the example of a prophet. But the prophecy of the psalms, whenever it is uttered in the person of the Lord, never fails to add something peculiar and proper to him, which no other could have in common with him: so that, since many things recalled in the person of the man he assumed were common to the persons and natures of men, the prophecy of the psalm might rather show what was said properly in his person; as now this: "I looked to the right and saw, for there is no one who knows me. Flight has perished from me, and there is no one who seeks my soul." For David, though he fled, was not unknown; nor did he look only to the right, but the view to the left was open to him too. And how will this fit his person: "Flight has perished from me," then this, "and there is no one who seeks my soul," and finally this too, with which the psalm concludes: "The righteous wait for me until you repay me"? These are contrary to one another if understood in the person of a man. For if there are righteous who wait, how does no one know him? How does no one seek his soul? For no one seeks his soul and no one knows him because, as he looked to the right, no righteous man was seen.
141.4CSEL 22:802
Sed hsec omnia in domino tempore passionis inpleta sunt, cum euntem eum ad crucem eorum nemo comitatus est, quos ad possessionem regni caelestis secundum euangelicam dispositionem separatos a sinistra dextrae praeparabat, ob quos et homo erat natus: cum in tot tantisque crucis ipsius signis deum nemo cognouit, cum frequenter antea latens se his, qui eum quaerebant, et prodidit et ingessit. et per oblationem spontaneae uoluntatis fuga ab eo periit, cum nullus uirtutem uitae eius, quse in anima significatur, inquirit. corpus enim, quod cruci adfixerant, contuentes potestatem animae, quae se signis et factis deum probauerat, nemo quaerebat.
But all these things were fulfilled in the Lord at the time of the passion, when, as he went to the cross, none of those accompanied him whom, according to the Gospel arrangement, he was preparing, separated from the left, at the right for possession of the heavenly kingdom, and for whose sake he had been born a man; when, amid so many and such great signs of his cross, no one recognized God; when, though he had often hidden before, he betrayed and offered himself to those who sought him. And by the offering of his spontaneous will flight perished from him, when no one sought out the power of his life, which is signified in the soul. For looking at the body they had fixed to the cross, no one sought the power of the soul, which had proved itself God by signs and deeds.
141.5CSEL 22:802–803
Iam illa, quae secuntur, licet communia uideantur esse cum ceteris, tamen etiam per eum tempore passionis omnia dicta gestaque sunt. clamaui ad te, domine, et dixi: tu es spes mea, portio mea in terra uiuentium. clamans dixit: tu es spes mea, cum ait: pater, commendo in manus tuas spiritum meum. pars eius in terra uiuentium est, cum latroni die eadem incolatum paradisi promittit, id est sortem et regnum hereditatis suse, ut, licet inferos adiret, tamen per spiritalem potestatem doceret se a paradiso non abesse.
And what follows, though it may seem common with others, was nonetheless all said and done by him at the time of the passion. "I cried to you, O Lord, and said: You are my hope, my portion in the land of the living." Crying, he said, "You are my hope," when he says: "Father, into your hands I commend my spirit." His portion is in the land of the living when he promises the thief residence in paradise that same day, that is, the lot and kingdom of his inheritance, so that, although he went to the underworld, yet he taught through spiritual power that he was not absent from paradise.
141.6CSEL 22:803
Redit deinde ad orationis suae modestiam dicens: intende orationem meam: quia humiliatus sum nimis. humiliatus est enim formam serui accipiens et oboediens factus usque ad mortem, mortem autem crucis. libera me a persequentibus me: quia confortati sunt super me. educ de carcere animam meam ad confitendum nomini tuo, domine. quamquam enim potestatem haberet ponendi animam suam et resumendi, tamen semper per reuerentiam filii honorem paternae maiestati reseruauit, cum orat: pater, clarifica me; cum proclamat: deus meus, quare me dereliquisti? in his enim non est infirmitatis suae confessio, sed paternse uirtutis prsedicatio. liberari se ergo nunc similiter a persequentibus orat, quia confortati sunt. confortati enim sunt, cum ad crucem dant, cum per carnem deum nesciunt, cum eos habitus humilitatis et forma in eo seruilis hortatur.
Then he returns to the modesty of his prayer, saying: "Attend to my prayer, for I have been humbled exceedingly." For he was humbled, taking the form of a servant and becoming obedient unto death, even the death of the cross. "Deliver me from those who persecute me, for they have been strengthened over me. Bring my soul out of prison, to confess your name, O Lord." For although he had power to lay down his soul and take it up again, yet through the reverence of a Son he always reserved the honor for the Father's majesty, when he prays, "Father, glorify me," when he cries, "My God, why have you forsaken me?" For in these there is no confession of his weakness, but a proclamation of the Father's power. He prays, then, now likewise to be delivered from his persecutors, because they have been strengthened. For they were strengthened when they hand him over to the cross, when through the flesh they do not know God, when the garb of humility and the form of a servant in him encourage them.
141.7CSEL 22:803–804
Deinde rogat, ut anima sua educatur e carcere. si in carcere positis etiam ante Noe tempora resurrectionem secundum beatum Petrum dominus prsedicauit, carcer est inferi, a quo se educi rogat, ut in altero psalmo erat precatus: ne contineat super me puteus os suum. oratio omnis ista ad confessionem, ut diximus, uirtutis paternse est. sed adiecit et causam, cur se de carcere oret educi: ad confitendum, inquit, nomini tuo. resurrectio enim eius paternae in se uirtutis prsedicatio est, quia potestas ei omnis ex patre est.
Then he asks that his soul be brought out of prison. If, according to blessed Peter, the Lord preached the resurrection even to those placed in prison from before the times of Noah, the prison is the underworld, from which he asks to be brought out, as he had prayed in another psalm: "Let not the pit shut its mouth over me." This whole prayer, as we said, is for the confession of the Father's power. But he also added the reason why he prays to be brought out of prison: "To confess," he says, "your name." For his resurrection is a proclamation of the Father's power in him, since all power is his from the Father.
141.8CSEL 22:804–805
Sed per quos sit dei nomini confitendum, subiecit dicens: me expectant iusti, donec retribuas mihi. omnium apostolorum fides usque ad resurrectionis tempus fuit trepida: quam in domino contuentes expectationis suae securitate firmati sunt. et hinc illud est a domino dictum: tristis est anima mea usque ad mortem. non enim ait: propter mortem, quia, licet se passioni daret, non tamen uirtus aeterna dolorem passionis exciperet; sed quia apostolorum metus per humilitatem passionis exortus — adeo ut et firma illa supersedificandse in ea ecclesiae petra trepidaret — post mortem et resurrectionem domini in eadem trepidatione esse desineret, idcirco usque ad mortem tristis est, post quam trepidantis fidei essent securitate firmandi. expectant ergo iusti, donec sibi retribuatur a deo. et quid ei a deo retribuatur, apostolus docuit dicens: propter hoc exaltauit eum deus et donauit ei nomen, quod est super omne nomen: ut in nomine Iesu omne genu flectat, cselestium et terrestrium et infernorum, et omnis lingua confiteatur, quia dominus Iesus in gloria dei patris est. haec ei a deo retributio est, ut ei corpori, quod adsumpsit, paternae gloriae donetur aeternitas. quse autem sit iustorum expectatio, idem apostolus docet dicens: nostra autem conuersatio in caelis est. unde et saluificatorem expectamus Iesum Christum, qui transformabit corpus humilitatis nostrae conformatum corpori gloriae suae. expectant ergo iusti, dum retribuatur illi: scilicet ut conformes fiant gloriae corporis sui, qui est benedictus in saecula saeculorum. amen.
But through whom God's name is to be confessed he added, saying: "The righteous wait for me until you repay me." The faith of all the apostles was trembling until the time of the resurrection: beholding it in the Lord, they were strengthened with the security of their expectation. And hence the Lord's saying: "My soul is sorrowful unto death." For he does not say "because of death," since, though he gave himself to suffering, his eternal power did not receive the pain of the passion; but because the fear of the apostles, arising from the humility of the passion (so much so that even that firm rock, on which the church was to be built, trembled), would cease in that same trembling after the Lord's death and resurrection, therefore he is sorrowful unto death, after which they were to be strengthened with the security of a trembling faith. The righteous wait, then, until it is repaid him by God. And what is repaid him by God the apostle taught, saying: "Therefore God exalted him and gave him the name that is above every name, that at the name of Jesus every knee should bend, of things in heaven and on earth and under the earth, and every tongue confess that the Lord Jesus is in the glory of God the Father." This is the repayment to him from God, that to the body he assumed the eternity of the Father's glory is given. And what the expectation of the righteous is, the same apostle teaches, saying: "But our citizenship is in heaven, whence also we await the Savior, Jesus Christ, who will transform the body of our lowliness, conformed to the body of his glory." The righteous wait, then, until he is repaid: namely, so that they may be made conformable to the glory of his body, who is blessed for ever and ever. Amen.
Tractates 142
142.1CSEL 22:805
Psalmi superscriptio nulla esse secundum Hebrseos uidetur; id enim ab his, qui utraque lingua eruditi sunt, traditur. translatoresque ceteri nihil omnino de rebus gestis, id est de Abessalon in Dauid patris sui insectatione scripserunt. sed hi septuaginta seniores, quibus legis ac prophetarum scientia ultra praescriptum et ambiguitatem litterae fuit, addendum hoc psalmo iudicauerunt. causam uero iudicii istius in exordio psalmorum docuimus, per quam nihil in psalmis nisi propheticum cognoscimus oportere tractari. cum enim nec gestis sermo nec temporibus ordo conueniat, relicum est, in exemplum ac scientiam gerendorum et gesta omnia in Dauid et ab his intellecta esse doceamur. adposita ergo nunc psalmo superscriptio est, quae non extat in libro, ut, ubi extat — id est sicut in psalmo tertio, in quo a facie eius, qui nunc persequi scribitur, fugerit —, ad scientiam propheticae intellegentiae uocaremur.
According to the Hebrews the psalm seems to have no superscription; this is handed down by those learned in both languages. And the other translators wrote nothing at all about the events, that is, about Absalom's pursuit of his father David. But those seventy elders, who had a knowledge of the law and the prophets beyond what is written and the ambiguity of the letter, judged that this should be added to the psalm. The reason for this judgment we taught at the beginning of the Psalms, by which we know that nothing but the prophetic is to be treated in the psalms. For since the speech does not fit the events nor the order the times, it remains that we be taught that all the events in David were also understood by them as an example and knowledge of what is to be done. A superscription has been placed on the psalm now, then, which does not stand in the book, so that, where it does stand (that is, as in the third psalm, in which he is written to have fled from the face of him who is now written to pursue), we might be called to the knowledge of prophetic understanding.
142.2CSEL 22:805–806
Prophetat ergo nunc Dauid passionibus suis dominicas passiones: non de Abessalon conquerens, sed de his, qui Abessalon ad impietatis crimen ignirent. ignita enim secundum apostolum diaboli sunt iacula, quae se in cor Iudae, ut dominus traderetur, iniecerint et nunc in filiis inoboedientise operentur. ob quod dominus adsumpta peccati carnis similitudine de peccato condemnauit peccatum in carne. tractabimus ergo psalmum ex persona prophetae intellegentis se in peccati corpore positum et inter multas et graues diaboli temptationes per hominem fatigari. nam ut dominus principem mundi non ignorauit haec in se per Iudseos Iudamque gessisse, cum ad apostolos dicit: ecce ex uobis unus est satanas — totus enim hoc esse, quia per eum animabatur, ostenditur —, ita et Dauid in Abessalon eos, per quos Abessalon est talis, intellegit. et quia iam in tertio psalmo latior hinc fuit sermo, nunc psalmi ipsius dicta tractemus ita, ut meminerimus omnia, quaecumque sub prophetae nomine dicentur, etiam ad personam domini esse referenda, qui se ex forma dei euacuans et formam serui adsumens infirmissimum naturse nostrae hominem etiam usque ad ignoratae diei atque horae suae scientiam sit professus.
David, then, now prophesies the Lord's sufferings by his own sufferings: not complaining of Absalom, but of those who inflamed Absalom to the crime of impiety. For according to the apostle the darts of the devil are fiery, which threw themselves into the heart of Judas so that the Lord might be betrayed, and now work in the sons of disobedience. For this reason the Lord, having assumed the likeness of sinful flesh, condemned sin in the flesh because of sin. We shall treat the psalm, then, in the person of a prophet who understands that he is placed in a body of sin and is wearied by many and grave temptations of the devil through a man. For as the Lord was not unaware that the prince of the world had done these things to him through the Jews and Judas, when he says to the apostles, "Behold, one of you is a devil" (for he is shown to be wholly this, because he was animated by him), so David too understands, in Absalom, those through whom Absalom is such. And since the discussion of this was broader in the third psalm, let us now treat the words of the psalm itself, remembering that everything said under the name of the prophet is also to be referred to the person of the Lord, who, emptying himself from the form of God and taking the form of a servant, professed himself a man of our nature, most weak, even to the point of not knowing his own day and hour.
142.3CSEL 22:806–807
Deus, exaudi orationem meam, auribus percipe obsecrationem meam: in ueritate tua exaudi me. in tua iustitia. primum orationem suam deprecatur audiri, quia id humilitatis humanae est, ut audientiam dei his, quse orat, exoptet. sequenti deinde secundum propheticam scientiam, ut in ueritate dei audiatur, expostulat. non est huic fideli uiro deus ex elementis saeculi, non ex regum nominibus, non ex errore saeculi in saxis et metallis et lignis: sed uerus ei deus est, aeternus, omnipotens et uniuersitatis effector. tertia quoque postulatio est, ut in iustitia dei audiatur. non est tyrannicse uoluntatis deus, non prsedurse et iniquae pertinaciae arbiter, sed qui rationem habeat infirmitatis humanae neque hos demutabilis naturae nostrae promptissimos lapsus secundum indemutabilis substantiae suae indeflexam constantiam metiatur, sed iustus et moderans tantum ab homine expectet, quantum meminerit humanae licere naturae.
"O God, hear my prayer; give ear to my supplication; in your truth hear me, in your righteousness." First he asks that his prayer be heard, because it belongs to human humility to long for God's hearing of what it prays. Then, according to prophetic knowledge, he demands to be heard in God's truth. For this faithful man God is not from the elements of the world, not from the names of kings, not from the error of the world in stones and metals and wood, but is to him the true God, eternal, almighty, and maker of the universe. The third request too is that he be heard in God's righteousness. God is not of a tyrannical will, not an arbiter of harsh and unjust obstinacy, but one who takes account of human weakness and does not measure these most ready slips of our changeable nature by the unbending constancy of his unchangeable substance, but, just and moderate, expects from man only as much as he remembers is possible for human nature.
142.4CSEL 22:807
Et ideo subiecit ad id, quod se in iustitia dei orauit audiri: et non intres in iudicium cum seruo tuo: quia non iustificabitur in conspectu tuo omnis uiuens. quid enim spei est, si iudicare nos secundum se deus uelit, si ad conparationem sui uitse nostrse innocentiam postulabit? iustificari autem in conspectu dei quis uiuentium potest, cui ira, cui dolor, cui cupiditas, cui ignoratio, cui obliuio, cui casus, cui necessitas uel per naturam corporis uel per motum animae semper fluctuantis admixta sit, cui et cotidie grauissimus hostis immineat, diabolus uidelicet animae uiri fidelis insidians eamque ad interitum persequens? hanc enim esse causam docet, qua nemo uiuens iustificari in conspectu dei possit: quia persecutus est inimicus animam meam, humiliauit in terra uitam meam, collocauit me in obscuris sicut mortuos saeculi. obscuritas per corporis uitia effunditur, et cum per diaboli laqueos in cupiditates carnis incidimus, a cognitionis luce depulsi in obscuris collocamur gentilium tenebris demersi et ssecularium operum nocte detenti.
And therefore he added to his prayer to be heard in God's righteousness: "And do not enter into judgment with your servant, for no living one will be justified in your sight." For what hope is there if God wishes to judge us according to himself, if he demands the innocence of our life by comparison with himself? And who of the living can be justified in God's sight, in whom anger, pain, desire, ignorance, forgetfulness, chance, necessity are always mixed, whether through the nature of the body or through the motion of an ever-wavering soul, and over whom daily the gravest enemy looms, namely the devil, lying in wait for the soul of the faithful man and pursuing it to destruction? For he teaches that this is the reason why no living one can be justified in God's sight: "For the enemy has pursued my soul; he has humbled my life to the earth; he has placed me in dark places like the dead of the world." Darkness is poured out through the vices of the body, and when through the snares of the devil we fall into the desires of the flesh, driven from the light of knowledge we are placed in darkness, sunk in the darkness of the Gentiles and held in the night of worldly works.
142.5CSEL 22:807
Sed quantumlibet persequens animam inimicus et humilians in corpore tamquam mortuum saeculi collocet in obscuro, spiritalis tamen uiri anxietas his corporis tenebris non tenetur et cor super hac ipsa naturae suae infirmitate turbatur repugnansque uitiis hominem suum in memoriam primse suse constitutionis et in meditationem dei operum conuertit non enim eum inimicus in obscuris mortuum saeculi, sed tamquam mortuum saeculi collocauit: per quod libertas spiritus semper in se anxii reseruatur.
But however much the enemy, pursuing the soul and humbling it in the body, places it in darkness as one dead to the world, yet the anxiety of a spiritual man is not held by these darknesses of the body, and his heart is troubled over this very weakness of his nature, and, fighting against vices, he turns his man to the memory of his first constitution and to meditation on the works of God. For the enemy has placed him in darkness not as dead to the world, but as if dead to the world: by which the freedom of the spirit, always anxious in itself, is preserved.
142.6CSEL 22:807–808
Id enim sequitur: et anxiatus est in me spiritus meus: in me turbatum est cor meum. memor fui dierum antiquorum, meditatus sum in omnibus operibus tuis, in factis manuum tuarum meditabar. scit Adam a diabolo captum et idcirco memor est antiquorum dierum. scit eum per transgressionem legis constitutae et a promissionibus dei et ab incolatu paradisi excidisse, et ideo memor est operum dei. scit non sufficere ex praeterito innocentiam, sed beatum esse, qui usque in finem innocens esse permanserit, et ideo in factis manuum dei meditatur. facta manuum dei homo ipse est; qui, postquam peccauit, peccati seruus effectus est. talis igitur esse meditatur, qualis ille, qui a deo factus est, fuit ante peccatum. per quod quia non mortuus saeculi, sed tamquam mortuus saeculi in obscuris est collocatus, meditabitur semper; et meditabitur semper, quia antiquorum dierum memor scit per transgressionem legis mortem introisse peccati.
For there follows: "And my spirit was anxious within me; within me my heart was troubled. I remembered the days of old; I meditated on all your works; I meditated on the works of your hands." He knows that Adam was captured by the devil, and therefore he remembers the days of old. He knows that through transgression of the established law he fell from the promises of God and from dwelling in paradise, and therefore he remembers the works of God. He knows that innocence in the past is not enough, but that blessed is he who has remained innocent to the end, and therefore he meditates on the works of God's hands. Man himself is the work of God's hands; who, after he sinned, became a servant of sin. He meditates, then, on being such as was the one made by God before sin. And since through this he has been placed in darkness not as dead to the world but as if dead to the world, he will always meditate; and he will always meditate because, remembering the days of old, he knows that through the transgression of the law the death of sin entered.
142.7CSEL 22:808
In eo autem, quod et memor dierum antiquorum et in operibus dei meditatus est atque meditabitur, quamquam per fidem suam coeperit, tamen non proprium suum esse, ne insolens existimetur, sed per auxilium dei, ad quem orauit, sibi indultum esse demonstrat dicens: expandi manus meas ad te: anima mea sicut terra sine aqua. terra sine aqua arida et infecunda est et inrigari se semper imbre pluuise caelestis expectat: ita et sancti anima naturse suse conscia, immadescere se dono diuini eloquii desiderat, de quo Moyses ait: expectetur sicut pluuia dictum meum, et descendant sicut ros uerba mea, ut pluuia super gramen et ut niues super faenum. arens ergo et sitiens anima tali propheticse doctrinse imbre perfunditur, ut mortua et ieiuna ariditate naturae in uberes fructus praeceptorum dei cognitione reuirescat.
But in that he both remembered the days of old and meditated and will meditate on the works of God, although he began this by his own faith, yet, lest he be thought insolent, he shows that it is not his own but granted him by the help of God, to whom he prayed, saying: "I stretched out my hands to you; my soul is like earth without water." Earth without water is dry and barren and always waits to be watered by the shower of heavenly rain: so the soul of the saint, conscious of its nature, desires to be moistened by the gift of the divine word, of which Moses says: "Let my saying be awaited like rain, and let my words come down like dew, like rain upon the grass and like snow upon the hay." The dry and thirsty soul, then, is drenched with such a shower of prophetic teaching that, dead and starved by the dryness of nature, it grows green again into rich fruits through the knowledge of God's commandments.
142.8CSEL 22:808–809
Iam in his, quae secuntur, humanae fidei et conscientise confessio est, per diapsalmi intercessionem inpatientia prophetici desiderii monstrata. uelociter exaudi me, domine, defecit spiritus meus. moras corporis sui propheta non patitur et secundum illud apostoli: dissolui me melius est et cum Christo esse et illud: miser ego homo, quis me liberabit de corpore mortis huius? et illud: quia in hoc ueteri tabernaculo congemescimus desiderantes superindui taedia et ipse in hoc mortis corpore patitur, sed uelocitatem auxilii, quod ob defectionem spiritus deprecatur, cum gratia diuini in se muneris optat expleri. quid enim sibi proderit exauditum esse uelociter, nisi tamquam fidelis et deo placens et beatis locis quieturus excedat corpore?
Now in what follows is the confession of human faith and conscience, the impatience of the prophet's desire being shown through the interposition of the diapsalma. "Hear me quickly, O Lord; my spirit has failed." The prophet does not bear the delays of his body, and, according to that saying of the apostle, "To be dissolved and to be with Christ is better," and that one, "Wretched man that I am, who will deliver me from the body of this death?" and that one, "For in this old tabernacle we groan, longing to be clothed over," he too suffers weariness in this body of death; but he desires the speed of the help which he asks because of the failing of his spirit to be fulfilled with the grace of the divine gift in him. For what will it profit him to have been heard quickly unless he departs from the body as one faithful and pleasing to God and about to rest in blessed places?
142.9CSEL 22:809
Et idcirco ait: non auertas faciem tuam a me: et similis ero descendentibus in lacum. lacum poenalem inferorum locum scriptura commemorat, ut in his psalmis ait: tu, domine, abstraxisti ab infero animam meam, seruasti me a descendentibus in lacum. ergo nisi facies dei, qui utique Christus est, qui imago dei inuisibilis est, unicuique sancto adfuerit, erit illis similis, qui poenae inferni deputati ex uita hac sine spe quietis excesserint
And therefore he says: "Do not turn your face away from me, and I shall be like those who go down into the pit." Scripture mentions the pit as the penal place of the underworld, as it says in these psalms: "You, O Lord, have drawn my soul from the underworld; you have saved me from those who go down into the pit." Unless, then, the face of God, which is surely Christ, who is the image of the invisible God, is present to each saint, he will be like those who, assigned to the punishments of hell, have departed this life without hope of rest.
142.10CSEL 22:809–810
Sed de spe sua propheta non ambigit neque extra euangelicse securitatis fiduciam est, tempore quidem ipse anterior, sed in spiritu apostolici gaudii particeps, qui resurrectionem domini contuentes seternitatem caducorum corporum crediderunt. id enim consequenti ait: auditam fac mihi mane misericordiam tuam: quia in te speraui, domine. matutinae autem huius misericordise gaudium locis plurimis demonstratur, uel tum cum ait: ad uesperam demorabitur fletus, et ad matutinum lsetitia. hoc enim resurrectionis est tempus, in quo per misericordiam dei potestas mortis infracta est; quam misericordiam, quia in ea propheta sperauit, optat audire.
But the prophet does not doubt about his hope, nor is he outside the confidence of Gospel security: earlier indeed in time, but in spirit a sharer in the joy of the apostles, who, beholding the resurrection of the Lord, believed in the eternity of perishable bodies. For he says next: "Make me hear your mercy in the morning, for in you I have hoped, O Lord." The joy of this morning mercy is shown in very many places, as when it says: "Weeping will linger at evening, and joy in the morning." For this is the time of the resurrection, in which through God's mercy the power of death has been broken; and this mercy, because the prophet hoped in it, he desires to hear.
142.11CSEL 22:810–811
Dehinc sequitur: notam fac mihi uiam, in qua ambulem: quia ad te leuaui animam meam. apostolus per speculum et in senigmate uidet, et pro parte scit et pro parte prophetat. propheta quoque, tamquam per naturam humanae fragilitatis ignorans, notas sibi fieri, in quibus ambulet, uias orat. non enim hse saeculi uise utiles sunt: spiritales illas et caelestes ille nosse desiderat. id enim ait: quia ad te leuaui animam meam. non in humilibus est anima illius, sed in excelsis et idcirco excelsarum uiarum postulat notionem. scit enim esse inimicos sibi, qui se in alias uias auocent, qui in uoluntatem alteram deducant. de inimicis istis spiritalibus apostolus multa et frequenter ingessit. ab his ergo se eripi orat et uiam tribulatam, quae ad caelum agit, cognoscere rogat et de uoluntate domini doceri et per spiritum eius in terram rectam deduci: id est, ut constituatur in hominem non uitiis peruersum. nam in rectam terram se dirigi quomodo optasse de elementi huius natura existimabitur, nisi quod secundum primi hominis naturam, cui post peccatum dictum est: terra es et in terram ibis, constitui se hominem rectum indeflexumque desiderat? id enim sub his dictis continetur: notam fac mihi uiam, in qua ambulem: quia ad te leuaui animam meam. eripe me de inimicis meis, domine, ad te confugi: doce me facere uoluntatem tuam, quia tu deus meus es. spiritus tuus bonus deducet me in terram rectam propter nomen tuum, domine.
Then follows: "Make known to me the way in which I should walk, for to you I have lifted up my soul." The apostle sees through a mirror and in a riddle, and knows in part and prophesies in part. The prophet too, as one ignorant through the nature of human frailty, prays that the ways in which he should walk be made known to him. For these ways of the world are not useful: he desires to know those spiritual and heavenly ones. For he says: "For to you I have lifted up my soul." His soul is not in lowly things but on high, and therefore he asks for knowledge of lofty ways. For he knows that there are enemies to him who call him away into other ways, who lead him into another will. Of these spiritual enemies the apostle spoke much and often. From these, then, he prays to be rescued, and asks to know the narrow way that leads to heaven, to be taught concerning the Lord's will, and to be led by his Spirit into right land: that is, that he may be established as a man not perverted by vices. For how will he be thought to have desired to be directed into right land in terms of the nature of this element, unless it is that, according to the nature of the first man, to whom it was said after sin, "You are earth and to earth you will go," he desires to be established as an upright and unbent man? For this is contained under these words: "Make known to me the way in which I should walk, for to you I have lifted up my soul. Rescue me from my enemies, O Lord; I have fled to you. Teach me to do your will, for you are my God. Your good Spirit will lead me into right land for your name's sake, O Lord."
142.12CSEL 22:811
Consonans apostoli confessio est ad id, quod ait: doce me facere uoluntatem tuam, illud, quod per eum dictum est: et qui putat se scire, nondum scit, quemadmodum oporteat se scire. quod si ne orare quidem adhuc scimus et loqui desideria nostra non nouimus spiritu potius pro nobis inenarrabilibus gemitibus postulante et inperitiam nostram arcanse scientiae affectu repensante secundum hoc apostoli dictum: quid enim oremus secundum id, quod oporteat, nescimus; sed ipse spiritus pro nobis postulat gemitibus inenarrabilibus, non incondite propheta creditur orare, ut uoluntatem dei doceatur explere. et conpetens illa humanae uerecundise professio est, ut, quod per spiritum dei in terram rectam deducendus sit, id non meriti esse sui arroget neque per satisfactionem proprii obsequii id sibi postulet, sed totum hoc ad clarificandum in se dei nomen expectet, ut propter honorem dei nominis in terra recta esse statuatur.
The apostle's confession agrees with his saying, "Teach me to do your will": what was said through him: "And he who thinks he knows does not yet know as he ought to know." But if we do not yet even know how to pray and do not know how to speak our desires, the Spirit rather interceding for us with unutterable groanings and making up for our ignorance by the disposition of hidden knowledge, according to this saying of the apostle, "For we do not know what we should pray as we ought; but the Spirit himself intercedes for us with unutterable groanings," the prophet is not believed to pray in a disordered way when he prays to be taught to fulfil God's will. And that is a fitting profession of human modesty: that he should not claim as his own merit that he is to be led by the Spirit of God into right land, nor ask it for himself on account of the satisfaction of his own service, but should await all this for the glorifying of God's name in him, so that he may be established in right land for the honor of God's name.
142.13CSEL 22:811–812
Et quia hanc terram rectam scit sibi non in corpore mortis huius posse concedi, quia labes carnis humanae per admixtam in se uitiorum consuetudinem aboleri penitus nisi cum naturae demutatione non possit, uiuificari se, quasi nondum uiuat, expostulat dicens: uiuificabis me in sequitate tua. educes de tribulatione animam meam et in misericordia tua disperdes inimicos meos. et perdes omnes, qui tribulant animam meam: quoniam seruus tuus ego sum. habuit quidem, ut diximus, hoc iustitia uerecundise, ut, quidquid illud sibi beatitudinis sperat, id pro magnificentia dei potius — quia deo beata et seterna et bona tribuere sit dignum —, quam pro merito suo postulet. sed tamen prseferens honorem et misericordiam dei merendi quoque id per se non exclusit officium. nam cum uiuificandus sit, uiuificandus tamen est in sequitate, quia aequum sit uitam retribui stipendiis sanctitatis. et cum per misericordiam dei educto eo de tribulatione disperdendi sint eius inimici, iam non est misericordia indiscreti confusique iudicii, cum, quae a tribulatione educit, eadem disperdat inimicos: quia ex meritorum diuersitate uel in poenam uel in salutem misericordise iudicium temperetur.
And since he knows that this right land cannot be granted to him in the body of this death, because the stain of human flesh, through the habit of vices mixed into it, cannot be wholly abolished except with a change of nature, he asks to be given life, as though he did not yet live, saying: "You will give me life in your equity. You will bring my soul out of tribulation, and in your mercy you will destroy my enemies, and you will destroy all who afflict my soul, for I am your servant." The justice of modesty indeed held this, as we said: that whatever blessedness he hopes for, he should ask it rather for the sake of God's magnificence (because it is worthy of God to grant blessed, eternal, and good things) than for his own merit. But nevertheless, while putting first the honor and mercy of God, he did not exclude the duty of deserving it too by himself. For when he is to be given life, he is to be given life in equity, because it is equitable that life be repaid to the service of holiness. And when, through God's mercy, as he is brought out of tribulation, his enemies are to be destroyed, it is no longer a mercy of indiscriminate and confused judgment, when the same mercy that brings him out of tribulation destroys his enemies: because the judgment of mercy is tempered according to the difference of merits, either toward punishment or toward salvation.
142.14CSEL 22:812–813
Non lenes autem sibi esse inimicos propheta demonstrat, sed eos, qui etiam animam persecuntur: non quod cum corpore possit occidi, sed quod ita diabolicis infestationibus fatigetur et subiectorum sibi uitiorum incentiuis agatur, ut a domino mereatur occidi. uerum ut etiam inimici sui pereant, quamquam ad id potissimum et nomen et misericordia dei est, tamen cum etiam ea causa est, quod seruus dei est, cuius animam persequantur. et liberalitas admiscetur et meritum atque ad domini misericordiam serui quoque et fides et nomen adiungitur: ut misericordia dei, quamquam omnibus prompta sit, his tamen, qui serui eius sunt, intellegatur adsistere per eum et in eo, qui ait: ego sum uobiscum omnibus diebus usque in consummationem saeculi, dominus noster Iesus Christus, qui est benedictus et nunc et semper et in omnia saecula saeculorum. amen.
The prophet shows that his enemies are not mild, but such as pursue even the soul: not that it can be killed with the body, but that it is so wearied by diabolical assaults and driven by the incitements of vices subject to them that it deserves to be killed by the Lord. But that his enemies too should perish, although God's name and mercy are chiefly for this, yet there is also this reason: that he whose soul they pursue is God's servant. Both generosity and merit are mingled, and to the Lord's mercy are joined the faith and name of the servant too: so that the mercy of God, although ready for all, may be understood to stand by those who are his servants, through him and in him who says: "I am with you all days, even to the consummation of the age," our Lord Jesus Christ, who is blessed now and always and for all ages of ages. Amen.
Tractates 143
143.1CSEL 22:813–814
Et huic quoque psalmo addendam hanc septuaginta superscriptionem putauerunt: psalmus Dauid in Goliam, cum neque in hebraicis libris reperiatur neque translatores alii quicquam aliud quam simplicem titulum praescripserint, id est: Dauid. quod non sine spiritali ratione effectum fuisse psalmi ipsius textu docetur nihilque hic psalmus proprium habet, quod ad gratulationem perempti Golise possit referri, cum magis illic et gestis et tempori multa contraria sint. cum enim dicitur: subiciens populum meum sub me, numquid tum Dauid rex erat? aut quis tum ei populus subiectus est, si allophylorum non erat suus? sed ne ipse quidem Israhel Saul adhuc regnante poterat esse subiectus. deinde et illud: domine, inclina caelum et descende; tange montes et fumigabuntur, corusca coruscationes et dissipabis eos, quae esse intellegetur ob humani belli tempus oratio? aut cum secundum titulum Golias esset occisus, quid sibi hae preces uolunt: eripe me et libera me de aquis multis et de manu filiorum alienorum? aut cum rex tantum unus in Israhel esset, quid est illud, quod dicitur: qui das salutem regibus? numerus plurium intellegentiam eius temporis, quo unus tantum habebatur, excludit. sed cum haec in hebreicis libris ita non sint neque translatores ceteri horum aliquid addiderint, intellegimus septuaginta hos seniores sensum nobis spiritalis scientiae reliquisse, ut in Dauid et Golia bellum prsefiguratum esse satanse dominique sciremus, cum quando neque superscriptio extaret in libris neque rebus gestis prophetise sermo concineret.
For this psalm too the Seventy thought this superscription should be added: "A psalm of David against Goliath," although it is not found in the Hebrew books, and the other translators prefixed nothing other than the simple title, that is, "David." That this was not done without a spiritual reason is taught by the text of the psalm itself; and this psalm has nothing proper to it that can be referred to rejoicing over the slaying of Goliath, since much in it is rather contrary both to the events and to the time. For when it is said, "subjecting my people under me," was David king then? Or what people was subject to him then, if that of the foreigners was not his? But not even Israel itself could be subject to him while Saul still reigned. Then too: "O Lord, bow the heavens and come down; touch the mountains and they will smoke; flash lightnings and you will scatter them": what prayer will this be understood to be for the time of a human war? Or, since according to the title Goliath had been killed, what do these prayers mean: "Rescue me and deliver me from many waters and from the hand of foreign sons"? Or, since there was only one king in Israel, what is the saying, "who gives salvation to kings"? The plural number excludes the understanding of that time in which only one was held king. But since these things are not so in the Hebrew books and the other translators added none of them, we understand that these seventy elders left us a sense of spiritual knowledge, so that we might know that the war of Satan and of the Lord was prefigured in David and Goliath, since neither did the superscription stand in the books nor did the speech of the prophecy agree with the events.
143.2CSEL 22:814–815
Adfert autem plerumque nobis difficultatem intellegentiae ratio latinitatis, quse nominibus pronomina non est solita prseponere, ut in Dauid nomine accidit. cessante enim pronomine incertum est, utrum in illum aut per illum psalmus extiterit. cum enim scribitur psalmus Dauid, utrum ab illo dictus sit aut propter illum, ambiguum facit nominis sola perscriptio. Grsecitas uero cum per Dauid psalmum scriptum esse significat, ita titulum scribit: ψαλμὸς τοῦ Δαυίδ; at uero cum de Dauid uult psalmum, qui sit scriptus, intellegi, ita superscribit: ψαλμὸς τῷ Δαυίδ, discernens per utriusque pronominis propriam significationem, utrum Dauid scripti psalmi auctor an causa sit: ut superscriptio psalmi istius continet: τῷ Δαυίδ — ita enim habet est, quod propter eum uel illi potius quam ab eo scriptus sit. ex quo etiam psalmi superscriptione monstratur, in eum hominem, quem dominus adsumpsit in eo nascens et quem Dauid saepissime nominari docuimus, psalmum hunc spiritus uirtute prophetae ore cantatum.
The nature of Latin often brings us difficulty of understanding, since it is not accustomed to put articles before names, as happens with the name of David. For without the article it is uncertain whether the psalm arose concerning him or through him. For when "a psalm of David" is written, the mere writing of the name makes it ambiguous whether it was spoken by him or on account of him. But the Greek, when it signifies that a psalm was written by David, writes the title thus: ψαλμὸς τοῦ Δαυίδ; but when it wants a psalm to be understood as written about David, it heads it thus: ψαλμὸς τῷ Δαυίδ, distinguishing through the proper meaning of each article whether David is the author or the cause of the psalm written. So the superscription of this psalm contains τῷ Δαυίδ: for thus it has it, which means that it was written on account of him or for him rather than by him. From this too it is shown by the superscription of the psalm that this psalm was sung by the power of the Spirit through the prophet's mouth about that man whom the Lord assumed, being born in him, and whom we have taught is very often named David.
143.3CSEL 22:815–816
Benedictus dominus deus meus, qui docet manus meas in bellum et digitos meos in proelium. si ob id gratulationi interfecti Goliae deputatur hic psalmus, quia dictum est: qui docet manus meas in bellum, accipiant exemplum personse hoc potius domini conuenire. nam in septimo decimo psalmo, qui totus ex persona domini consistit, id ipsum dictum ita meminimus: qui doces manus meas in proelium et posuisti ut arcum aereum brachia mea. quod autem nihil in illum Dauid referri possit in omni psalmo, maxime his dictis docetur: audiuit de templo sancto suo uocem meam et clamor meus in conspectu eius introiuit in aures eius. et commota est et contremuit terra et fundamenta montium conturbata sunt. et illud: clamauerunt, nec erat, qui saluos faceret, ad dominum, nec exaudiuit eos. et comminuam illos ut puluerem ante faciem uenti, ut lutum platearum delebo illos. eripies me de contradictionibus populi, constitues me in caput gentium. populus, quem non cognoui, seruiuit mihi, auditu auris obaudiuit mihi. rebus ipsis inepta eorum intellegentia coarguitur, qui haec Dauid de se ipso dixisse contendunt: cum omnia in eum hominem, quem dominus in eo natus adsumpsit, secundum spiritalem rationem et gesta conueniant.
"Blessed be the Lord my God, who teaches my hands for war and my fingers for battle." If this psalm is assigned to rejoicing over the slain Goliath because it is said, "who teaches my hands for war," let them accept the example that this rather fits the person of the Lord. For in the seventeenth psalm, which stands wholly in the person of the Lord, we remember this same thing said thus: "who teaches my hands for battle and has made my arms like a bow of bronze." And that nothing in the whole psalm can be referred to that David is taught especially by these words: "He heard my voice from his holy temple, and my cry before him entered his ears. And the earth was moved and trembled, and the foundations of the mountains were shaken"; and this: "They cried out, and there was no one to save them, to the Lord, and he did not hear them. And I will crush them like dust before the face of the wind; like the mud of the streets I will destroy them. You will rescue me from the contradictions of the people; you will set me as head of the nations. A people I did not know has served me; at the hearing of the ear it has obeyed me." The inept understanding of those who contend that David said these things about himself is refuted by the facts themselves: since all things agree, by spiritual reasoning and in deed, with that man whom the Lord, born in him, assumed.
143.4CSEL 22:816
Manus igitur eius edoctse ad bellum sunt, cum saeculum uincit: ego enim, ait, uici mundum; cum extensus in crucem inuictissimis armis ipsius passionis instruitur: et posuisti, inquit, ut arcum aereum brachia mea; cum de omnibus uirtutibus ac potestatibus in ipso se tropseo gloriosse crucis triumphat: et principatus et potestates enim traduxit cum fiducia triumphans eos in semetipso; cum dissidentia inter se caelestia et terrena pacificat: et in ipso, inquit, reconciliari omnia in eum, pacificans per sanguinem crucis suae siue quae in terra sunt siue quae in cselis. ad hoc igitur bellum manus eius edoctae sunt, in quo arcus serei certamine uincunt, dehonestatione potentes triumphantur, pace reconciliantur inimica. sed post manuum bellum succedit et digitorum praelium. omnis enim in eo habitus et pugna passionis ostenditur. manus enim extenduntur et digiti configuntur in palmis: uetus scilicet chirographum secundum apostolum delens et adfigens illud cruci etiam eas partes manuum commemorat in proelio, cum quibus omnia ueterum criminum peccata confixa sunt.
His hands, then, were taught for war when he conquers the world: "For I," he says, "have conquered the world"; when, stretched out on the cross, he is equipped with the most invincible arms of his passion itself: "and you have made," he says, "my arms like a bow of bronze"; when he triumphs over all powers and authorities in the trophy of his glorious cross: "For he led away principalities and powers with confidence, triumphing over them in himself"; when he makes peace between the heavenly and earthly things at odds with each other: "And in him," it says, "all things were reconciled to him, making peace through the blood of his cross, whether things on earth or things in heaven." For this war, then, his hands were taught, in which bows of bronze conquer in the contest, the powerful are triumphed over in disgrace, and enemies are reconciled in peace. But after the war of the hands follows also the battle of the fingers. For the whole posture and fight of the passion is shown in him. For the hands are stretched out and the fingers are nailed in the palms: blotting out, according to the apostle, the old bond and fixing it to the cross, he also recalls in the battle those parts of the hands with which all the sins of the old crimes were nailed.
143.5CSEL 22:816
Dehinc sequitur: misericordia mea et refugium meum, susceptor meus et liberator meus es tu, protector meus et in ipso speraui. carent ista difficultate. omnia enim in euangeliis ista gesta ab eo atque dicta sunt, ut honorem maiestatis paternse per humilitatis nostrse confessionem, quorum habitum adsumpserat, prsedicaret
Then follows: "My mercy and my refuge, my upholder and my deliverer are you, my protector, and in him I have hoped." These have no difficulty. For all these things were done and said by him in the Gospels, so that he might proclaim the honor of the Father's majesty through the confession of our lowliness, whose garb he had assumed.
143.6CSEL 22:816–817
Illud autem, quod ait: subiciens populum meum sub me, non ex persona unius Iudaici populi dictum existimandum est, cum uniuersitatem ecclesiae unum populum in psalmo alio nuncupauerit dicens: populus, quem non cognoui, seruiuit mihi. quod autem etiam hic, qui eum non cognouit, suus sit, euangelia docent, cum aiunt: in sua uenit, et sui eum non receperunt. in mundo erat, et mundus per eum factus est, et mundus eum non cognouit. sed ne forte hic populus, quem non cognouit et sibi seruiuit, non suus fuisse, quia non erat cognitus, existimetur. diuina illa Moysi cantio errorem hunc omnem ambiguitatis excludit dicens: cum diuisisset excelsus gentes, statuit fines gentium secundum numerum angelorum suorum, et facta est portio domini populus Iacob et funiculum hereditatis eius Israhel. Israhel iste in aeternam hereditatem fuerat electus; et ideo, quia ille portio domini erat, ceteri quasi incogniti habebantur, quia illi essent per priuilegium portionis electi. sui autem omnes, quia sibi, quod sunt, tamquam auctori suo debent.
But what he says, "subjecting my people under me," must not be thought said in the person of the one Jewish people, since in another psalm he called the whole church one people, saying: "A people I did not know has served me." And that this people too, which did not know him, is his, the Gospels teach, when they say: "He came to his own, and his own did not receive him. He was in the world, and the world was made through him, and the world did not know him." But lest this people, which he did not know and which served him, should be thought not to have been his because it was not known, that divine song of Moses excludes all this error of ambiguity, saying: "When the Most High divided the nations, he set the boundaries of the nations according to the number of his angels, and the people of Jacob became the Lord's portion, Israel the measured lot of his inheritance." This Israel had been chosen for an eternal inheritance; and therefore, since it was the Lord's portion, the others were held as if unknown, because those had been chosen by the privilege of the portion. But all are his, because they owe what they are to him as their author.
143.7CSEL 22:817–818
Subditi autem ei sunt, cum dicitur: sicut dedisti ei potestatem omnis carnis, ut omne quod dedisti ei, det illi uitam aeternam et illud: omnia data sunt mihi in caelo et in terra. data autem non tum ei primum, quia iam in mundo erat, per quem mundus erat factus, qui gloriam repetit, quam ante constitutionem mundi habuerat apud patrem; sed data post hominis adsumptionem, quia ita dictum est: qui cum in forma dei esset, formam serui accepit: propter quod exaltauit illum deus et donauit illi nomen, quod est super omne nomen. quid ergo uel cui donatur? non ei utique, qui in forma dei erat, donatur, ut dei forma sit; erat enim et, quia erat, iam non egebat hoc dono. sed fuit causa donandi, quia, qui in forma dei erat, formam serui accepit et se de forma dei euacuans, formam serui adsumens usque ad mortem oboediens fuit. oboedientise ergo illi, per quam habitus seruilis adsumitur, et ipsi habitu seruili id donatur, ut, quod erat, esset: in forma scilicet dei esset. damnum enim ac detrimentum sui euacuatio formae dei nesciit adsumptioni potius seruili formam dei rursus adquirens. ita neque uirtus in humilitate sese licet cohibens defecit ex sese, cum, quod erat, est: et humilitas cohibita in sese uirtute suscepta, cum, quod non erat, esse coepit, profectum eius, quae a se non defecerat, uirtutis accepit. et haec quidem euangelici sacramenti et humanse spei ueritas est, humanam naturam corruptibilemque carnem per huius glorise demutationem in seternam transformatam esse substantiam.
They are subjected to him when it is said, "As you have given him power over all flesh, that to all you have given him he may give eternal life," and that saying: "All things have been given to me in heaven and on earth." But they were not given to him then for the first time, since he was already in the world, through whom the world was made, he who asks again for the glory he had with the Father before the foundation of the world; but given after the assumption of the man, since it is said thus: "Who, though he was in the form of God, took the form of a servant; therefore God exalted him and gave him the name that is above every name." What, then, is given, or to whom? Certainly it is not given to him who was in the form of God, that he might be the form of God; for he was, and because he was, he no longer needed this gift. But there was a cause for giving, because he who was in the form of God took the form of a servant and, emptying himself from the form of God and assuming the form of a servant, was obedient unto death. To that obedience, then, through which the servant's garb is assumed, and to the servant's garb itself, this is given: that he should be what he was, namely in the form of God. For the emptying of the form of God knew no loss or detriment to itself, rather regaining the form of God for the assumed form of a servant. So neither did the power, though restraining itself in humility, fail from itself, since it is what it was; and the humility, restrained in itself, the power having been taken up, when it began to be what it was not, received the advance of that power which had not failed from itself. And this is the truth of the Gospel mystery and of human hope: that human nature and corruptible flesh, through the change of this glory, have been transformed into an eternal substance.
143.8CSEL 22:818–819
Sed huius tamquam difficillimi facti admirationem et maximae ac pulcherrimae spei donum etiam praesenti psalmo propheticus sermo testatur dicens ad id, quod dixerat: subiciens populum meum sub me; domine, quid est homo, quod innotuisti ei; aut filius hominis, quod deputas eum? homo uanitati similis factus est: dies eius sicut umbra praetereunt. non differenter in octauo quoque psalmo proclamat spiritus sanctus: quid est homo, quod memor es eius, aut filius hominis, quoniam uisitas eum? confessio ista pulcherrima est, ut indignum se homo tanto munere ipse testetur. et cum se indignum confitetur, gratiam eius, qui sibi haec largiatur, extollit. quod enim meritum hominis est, ut ei se cognoscibilem deus prsestet, ut incognoscibilis natura cognitioni nostrae sese ipsa submittat? aut quae dignitas est filii hominis, ut deputetur? deputatur autem, quidquid de eo, in quo est, in aliud destinatur. rei naturam uerborum uirtus eloquitur. homo uanitati similis effectus, et cuius dies tamquam umbra praetereunt, per indultam cognitionem dei deputatur. uanitas saeculum est, cuius habitus et forma tolletur. deo enim inane est, quidquid, quamuis extet, tamen non ita subsistat, ut maneat; et umbra quaecumque, etiamsi sit, tamen non est; quia cum fit, abeunte eo, per quem efficiebatur, eximitur. homo itaque non umbra, sed umbrae similis; neque uanitas, sed similis uanitati per intercessionem mortis effectus; per indultam uero sibi cognitionem dei deputatur. et in quid deputatur, cognitio indulta testatur. si enim cognitus fieri deus homini nisi adsumpto homine non potuit, quia incognoscibilem cognoscere, nisi per naturam nostram, natura nostra non potuit, et per hanc cognitionem homo deputatur. necesse est, ut in id deputetur, in quo deum ipse cognouit, scilicet ut conformis deo fiat, quia haec sit deputatio cognitionis indultae.
But the prophetic speech testifies in the present psalm too to the wonder at this, as it were, most difficult deed, and to the gift of the greatest and most beautiful hope, saying after what he had said, "subjecting my people under me": "O Lord, what is man that you have made yourself known to him, or the son of man that you reckon him? Man has become like vanity; his days pass like a shadow." Not differently in the eighth psalm too the Holy Spirit proclaims: "What is man that you are mindful of him, or the son of man that you visit him?" This confession is most beautiful, that man himself testifies he is unworthy of so great a gift. And when he confesses himself unworthy, he exalts the grace of him who bestows these things on him. For what merit has man, that God should make himself knowable to him, that an unknowable nature should submit itself to our knowledge? Or what dignity has the son of man, that he should be reckoned? Whatever is destined from what it is into something else is reckoned. The force of the words expresses the nature of the thing. Man, made like vanity and whose days pass like a shadow, is reckoned through the knowledge of God granted him. The world is vanity, whose fashion and form will be taken away. For to God whatever, though it exists, does not so subsist as to remain, is empty; and every shadow, even if it is, yet is not; because, when it comes to be, it is removed as that by which it was made goes away. Man, then, is not a shadow but like a shadow; nor vanity, but made like vanity through the intervention of death; but through the knowledge of God granted him he is reckoned. And into what he is reckoned the granted knowledge testifies. For if God could not become known to man except by assuming man, because our nature could not know the unknowable except through our nature, and through this knowledge man is reckoned, it is necessary that he be reckoned into that in which he himself knew God, namely that he become conformed to God, because this is the reckoning of the knowledge granted.
143.9CSEL 22:819–820
Et quia ex persona eius hominis, quem dominus adsumpsit, hsec omnis oratio est, scit, cum quanta se dignitate deus legibus mortis absoluat et iniquorum manibus per gloriam resurrectionis abripiat, dicens: domine, inclina cselum et descende: tange montes et fumigabuntur; corusca coruscationes et dissipabis eos: emitte sagittas tuas et conturbabis eos. emitte manum tuam de alto. simile his dictis psalmo, cuius superius meminimus, continetur: et inclinauit caelum et descendit, et carbones succensi sunt ab eo, et ignis a facie eius exardescet, et ascendit fumus in ira eius. misit sagittas et dissipauit eos; et fulgura multiplicauit et conturbauit eos. misit e summo et accepit me et adsumpsit me de multitudine aquarum. eripuit me de inimicis meis fortissimis. in eo autem, quod fortissimos dixit, possumus intellegere, quos dixerit; nempe de quibus apostolus ait: non est enim nobis pugna aduersus carnem et sanguinem, sed aduersus mundi potentes, aduersus spiritales nequitias in cselestibus: satana ipso se in cor Iudse, ut dominum traderet, inserente. sed et in hoc psalmo hoc contuendum est: coruscationes coruscationes et dissipabis eos; emitte sagittas tuas et conturbabis eos. nullos superius, de quibus ita memoraret, ostendit: quod necesse est ad montes hos referri, qui ad solum dei tactum fumabunt. et ne de terrenis istis montibus dictum existimemus, psalmo alio admonemur, cum dicitur: ut quid suscepistis, montes coagulatos? et quantum intellegi conceditur, montes interdum etiam diabolicas potestates, ut nunc in hoc loco, significari arbitramur: qui constitutiones diuinse legis transgressi tamquam ex lactis sinceritate uitiosa coaguli corruptione coacuerint. et hos esse potentissimos inimicos suos psalmus anterior locutus est.
And since this whole prayer is in the person of that man whom the Lord assumed, he knows with what great dignity God frees him from the laws of death and snatches him from the hands of the wicked through the glory of the resurrection, saying: "O Lord, bow your heaven and come down; touch the mountains and they will smoke; flash lightnings and you will scatter them; send out your arrows and you will confound them. Send out your hand from on high." Something similar to these words is contained in the psalm we mentioned above: "And he bowed heaven and came down, and coals were kindled by him, and fire will blaze from his face, and smoke went up in his anger. He sent arrows and scattered them, and multiplied lightnings and confounded them. He sent from on high and took me and drew me out of many waters. He rescued me from my strongest enemies." In saying "strongest," we can understand whom he meant: surely those of whom the apostle says: "For our fight is not against flesh and blood, but against the world-rulers, against spiritual wickednesses in the heavenly places": Satan himself putting it into the heart of Judas to betray the Lord. But in this psalm too we must observe: "Flash lightnings and you will scatter them; send out your arrows and you will confound them." He showed none above of whom he might speak thus: so this must be referred to these mountains, which will smoke at the mere touch of God. And lest we think it said of these earthly mountains, we are admonished by another psalm, when it is said: "Why do you look with suspicion, you curdled mountains?" And so far as it is granted to understand, we judge that mountains sometimes signify even diabolical powers, as now in this place: which, having transgressed the ordinances of the divine law, have soured, as it were, from the purity of milk by the vicious corruption of curdling. And the earlier psalm said these are his most powerful enemies.
143.10CSEL 22:820–821
Descendit ergo dominus inclinato caelo suo, non corporali motu, ut declinatum descendente eo caelum sit: sed per corporalem significationem spiritalis sensus instruitur, ut cum deo somnus, uigilise, memoria, obliuio, discessus et accessus adscribitur, quia secundum meritorum nostrorum differentiam unicuique nostrum aut dormiens aut uigilans aut inmemor aut recordans aut desit aut adsit. atque ita inclinatum descendente eo caelum est, quia descendenti ei ad adsumendum hominem famulatus caelestis adstiterit, cum Maria euangelizatur, cum pastores aerium coetum et sonum uident atque audiunt, cum post temptationem diaboli angeli ministrant, cum ipse totus in forma licet serui, tamen in paternse maiestatis uirtute se gessit. sic inclinatur caelum, cum ad terras caelestium uirtus honorque deducitur.
The Lord, then, came down, his heaven bowed, not by bodily motion, as though heaven bent as he descended; but through bodily signification a spiritual sense is instructed, as when sleep, waking, memory, forgetfulness, departure, and approach are ascribed to God, because according to the difference of our merits he is to each of us either sleeping or waking, forgetful or remembering, absent or present. And so heaven was bowed as he came down, because heavenly service stood by him as he came down to assume man: when Mary receives the good news, when the shepherds see and hear the heavenly company and its sound, when after the devil's temptation the angels minister, when he himself, though wholly in the form of a servant, conducted himself in the power of the Father's majesty. So heaven is bowed, when the power and honor of heavenly beings are brought down to earth.
143.11CSEL 22:821
In eo autem, quod tacti montes fumigant potius quam uruntur, cum tamen id indicet quod fumetur, deinde cum coruscantibus coruscationibus dissipantur potius quam inlucescunt, tum quod emissis sagittis conturbantur magis quam configuntur, non sine maxima ratione spiritalis intellegentise ita dicitur. et quidem iam et alius psalmus his paria significat, cum ait: prseparans montes in uirtute tua, accinctus potentia. aduentu enim domini confracta et obtrita diaboli potestas est, cum fidei sanctorum hominum subiectus est: non quod non adhuc potentiae suae habeat maximas uires, sed per id, quod utcumque subiectus est, praesentis subiectionis condicione ultioni et poense legitimae prseparatur, ut nunc per hanc eandem subiectionem uirtute dei tactus fumet, licet nondum totus uratur: sed per id, quod interim fumare potuit, et uri posse noscendus est. uritur non ille tantum, sed et omnes eius. non enim uni tantum prseparatus hic ignis est domino dicente: abite in ignem seternum, quem praeparauit pater meus diabolo et angelis eius. hi ergo montes tacti a domino fumigabunt.
But in that the mountains, touched, smoke rather than burn, though smoking indicates that something is burning; then that, when the lightnings flash, they are scattered rather than lit up; and that, when the arrows are sent out, they are confounded rather than pierced: it is said so not without the greatest reason of spiritual understanding. And indeed another psalm too signifies things like these, when it says: "preparing the mountains in your power, girded with might." For at the Lord's coming the devil's power was broken and crushed, when it was subjected to the faith of holy men: not that it does not still have the greatest forces of its power, but in that it is in some way subjected, it is prepared, by the condition of present subjection, for vengeance and lawful punishment, so that now, through this same subjection, touched by God's power, it smokes, though it is not yet wholly burned: but by the fact that it has been able meanwhile to smoke, it is to be known that it can also be burned. Not he alone is burned, but all his too. For this fire has not been prepared for one only, as the Lord says: "Depart into the eternal fire which my Father has prepared for the devil and his angels." These mountains, then, touched by the Lord, will smoke.
143.12CSEL 22:821
Dissipabuntur etiam coruscata coruscatione, lumen scilicet eorum, de quibus dictum est: uos estis lumen mundi, non ferentes. domini namque aduentus tamquam fulgur ab oriente usque in occidentem apparens intellegetur. sed interim coruscationes multae sunt, id est apostolicse prsedicationes et splendor doctrinae dei, quse condensam illam et conspiratam daemonum uirtutem coruscationis luce dispergit.
They will also be scattered by the flashing of lightning, not bearing the light, namely, of those of whom it is said, "You are the light of the world." For the Lord's coming will be understood as lightning appearing from the east to the west. But meanwhile there are many flashes of lightning, that is, the apostolic preachings and the splendor of God's teaching, which scatter that dense and conspiring power of the demons with the light of its flashing.
143.13CSEL 22:821–822
Sagittae etiam emissae conturbabunt eos. meminit eadem quoque prophetia et loco alio harum sagittarum: sagittae, inquit, paruulorum factse sunt plagse; eorum: paruulorum, ut apostolus ait, malitia, non sensu. horum igitur, id est fidelium ad innocentiam renatorum uerba tamquam sagittse emissae illos fumantes montes conturbabunt, cum regni caelestis beatitudo et seternitas praedicetur, cum honor saeculi contemnatur et Christi gloria speretur, cum luxus et ebrietas relinquatur et corpus ieiuniis purgetur, cum auaritia uincatur et largitio exerceatur, cum uirgines corpus suum oderint, cum uiduse fuisse uirgines maluissent, cum confessores uitam suam detestentur, cum mori martyribus sit optabile. et hoc totum sagittae istae, id est doctrinae et adhortationum uerba praestiterint, quae emissae eos, qui his aduersabantur, conturbant, cum cessante regno eorum Christi regni expectatio praedicatur.
The arrows too, sent out, will confound them. The same prophecy recalls these arrows in another place too: "The arrows of little ones," it says, "have become their wounds": of little ones, as the apostle says, in malice, not in understanding. Their words, then, that is, of the faithful reborn to innocence, sent out like arrows, will confound those smoking mountains, when the blessedness and eternity of the heavenly kingdom are proclaimed, when the honor of the world is despised and the glory of Christ hoped for, when luxury and drunkenness are left behind and the body is purified by fasts, when avarice is conquered and generosity practiced, when virgins hate their own body, when widows wish they had remained virgins, when confessors loathe their own life, when to die is desirable for martyrs. And all this these arrows, that is, the words of teaching and exhortation, will have achieved, which, sent out, confound those who opposed them, when, their kingdom ceasing, the expectation of Christ's kingdom is proclaimed.
143.14CSEL 22:822
Sed et ex alto manus domini emittitur. manum autem dei dominum nostrum Iesum Christum significari in spiritu non obscura doctrina est. per eum enim facta sunt omnia. et scriptum legimus: manus, inquit, mea auxiliabitur ei: quia per filium dei homo adsumptus laqueis mortis et iudicio iniquae damnationis per gloriam resurrectionis eripitur.
But the hand of the Lord is also sent out from on high. That our Lord Jesus Christ is signified in the Spirit by the hand of God is no obscure teaching. For through him all things were made. And we read it written: "My hand," he says, "will help him": because through the Son of God the man assumed is snatched from the snares of death and the judgment of an unjust condemnation by the glory of the resurrection.
143.15CSEL 22:822–823
Sequitur enim: eripe me de aquis multis. aquas populos dici, usitata cognitio est — ut etiam per Esaiam dicentem docemur: propter hoc ecce dominus inducet super uos aquam fluuii ualidam et multam et regem Assyriorum —, quorum uirtus atque uita in abolendum finem exemplo aquae transfluentis elabitur. ut hic idem propheta ait: perierunt sicut aqua prseter fluens: quia natura earum cessante incremento maris, in quod feruntur, eximitur. et de manu iniqua filiorum alienorum. dei enim esse destiterunt, de quibus dictum est: filii alieni inueterauerunt et quibus dictum est: uos de diabolo patre estis.
For there follows: "Rescue me from many waters." That peoples are called waters is common knowledge, as we are taught also by Isaiah, who says: "Because of this, behold, the Lord will bring upon you the water of the river, strong and abundant, and the king of the Assyrians": peoples whose strength and life slip away to their abolishing end after the example of flowing water, as this same prophet says: "They have perished like water flowing by," because their nature is removed, the increase of the sea into which they flow ceasing. "And from the unjust hand of foreign sons." For they have ceased to be God's, those of whom it is said, "Foreign sons have grown old," and to whom it is said, "You are of your father the devil."
143.16CSEL 22:823
Sed non solum filii alieni sunt dominum suum non recipiendo, sed etiam id, quod sequitur: quorum os locutum est uanitatem. uanitas oris et confessionis fuit illa, qua dictum est: nos non habemus regem, nisi Caesarem. regem enim sseculi, id est uanitatis populus in regnum aeternum electus elegit. et dextera eorum dextera iniquitatis. iniqua dextera est, cum palmis caedit, cum uirgis laniat, cum calamo conlidit, cum coronam spineam coaptat, cum clauo manus ac pedes figit, cum fel aceto admiscet, cum omnia iniquitatum opera consummat.
But they are foreign sons not only by not receiving their Lord, but also by what follows: "whose mouth has spoken vanity." That was the vanity of mouth and confession when it was said, "We have no king but Caesar." For the people chosen for an eternal kingdom chose the king of the world, that is, of vanity. "And their right hand is a right hand of iniquity." The right hand is unjust when it strikes with palms, when it tears with rods, when it beats with a reed, when it fits the crown of thorns, when it fixes hands and feet with nails, when it mixes gall with vinegar, when it completes all the works of iniquity.
143.17CSEL 22:823–824
Post quse potenter a domino gesta atque perfecta nouo nobis gloriosse uictoriae erit cantico concinendum. ait enim: deus, cantionem nouam cantabo tibi, psalterio decachordo psallam tibi. et quod hoc nouum canticum sit, contuendum est. plures autem nouum canticum cantantes psalmi reperiuntur. nonagesimus enim et quintus psalmus ita coepit: cantate domino canticum nouum, cantate domino omnis terra et rursum: adnuntiate inter gentes gloriam eius, in omni populo mirabilia eius et rursum: commoueatur a facie eius omnis terra, dicite in nationibus: dominus regnabit. hoc canticum nouum, quod omnis terra cantat, quod iam non intra Iudaeae libros atque fines cognitio eius, qui omnia creauit, esse celebratur; quod iam inter gentes gloria dei inuisibilis nuntiatur. quod omnes patriae gentium laudationem honoris debiti confitentur, quod in nationibus deus regnaturus ostenditur. nouum hoc inter tot errores sseculi canticum est et errantibus antea gentibus inopinatus hic hymnus est, per quem deus inuisibilis, incorporeus, aeternus et iusti iudicii iudex et beatae seternitatis rex esse cantatur.
After these things, done and accomplished mightily by the Lord, we shall have to sing a new song of glorious victory. For he says: "O God, I will sing a new song to you; on a ten-stringed psaltery I will sing psalms to you." And what this new song is must be considered. Many psalms are found singing a new song. For the ninety-fifth psalm begins thus: "Sing to the Lord a new song; sing to the Lord, all the earth"; and again: "Announce his glory among the nations, his wonders among all peoples"; and again: "Let all the earth be moved before his face; say among the nations: The Lord will reign." This is the new song, which all the earth sings: that knowledge of him who created all things is now celebrated no longer within the books and borders of Judea; that the glory of the invisible God is now announced among the nations; that all the families of the nations confess the praise of due honor; that God is shown to be about to reign among the nations. This song is new amid so many errors of the world, and this hymn is unexpected for the nations who before were straying, a hymn by which God is sung as invisible, incorporeal, eternal, judge of just judgment and king of blessed eternity.
143.18CSEL 22:824
Est et nonagesimus septimus psalmus canticum nouum cantans: cantate domino canticum nouum, quia mirabilia fecit dominus. sed nescio, an idcirco sit cantico nouo cantandum, quia mirabilia fecit deus, quae fecerit. olim caelum pulcherrimum atque mirabile manet, olim in eo astra indefessis officiorum suorum cursibus perseuerant, olim tempora alterno et indemutabili recursu temperantur, olim terra annuis fructibus diues est, olim homo maxime mirabile opus dei nascitur: et si nihil postea deus mirabile, cum haec creauit, adiecit, quaero, quod nouum canticum ob mirabilia facta cantandum sit? et non diu nos psalmus patitur errare. ob quae enim mirabilia nouum canticum cantaret, ostendit dicens: liberauit eum dextera eius et brachium sanctum eius. notum fecit dominus salutare suum ante conspectum gentium. hoc nouum canticum est. hoc mirabile dei est: quod liberauit eum dextera eius. quod sibi ipsi salutem uirtus sua tribuit. potestatem enim, inquit, habeo animam meam ponendi et potestatem habeo animam meam resumendi. non externo eguit unigenitus dei filius ad saluandum hominem, in quo nasci uoluit, auxilio et in gloria paternse maiestatis manens sua in se usus est potestate: per quam resurrectionis gloriam salutare suum notum gentibus fecit, cum in eo naturae suae carnem in aeternae salutis substantiam transformatam esse cognoscunt.
The ninety-seventh psalm too sings a new song: "Sing to the Lord a new song, for the Lord has done wonders." But I do not know whether a new song is to be sung because God has done the wonders he has done. Long since the heaven has remained most beautiful and wonderful, long since the stars in it persevere in the untiring courses of their duties, long since the seasons are tempered by an alternating and unchangeable return, long since the earth is rich with yearly fruits, long since man, the most wonderful work of God, is born: and if God added nothing wonderful afterward, when he created these, I ask what new song is to be sung for wonders done? And the psalm does not let us err long. For it shows for which wonders it would sing a new song, saying: "His right hand and his holy arm have delivered him. The Lord has made known his salvation in the sight of the nations." This is the new song, this the wonder of God: that his right hand delivered him, that his own power gave salvation to himself. "For I have power," he says, "to lay down my soul and I have power to take up my soul again." The only-begotten Son of God did not need outside help to save the man in whom he willed to be born, and, remaining in the glory of the Father's majesty, he used his own power in himself: through which by the glory of the resurrection he made his salvation known to the nations, when they recognize that in him the flesh of their own nature has been transformed into the substance of eternal salvation.
143.19CSEL 22:824–825
Cantat et centesimus quadragesimus et nonus psalmus canticum nouum. et cur sit hoc canticum nouum, mox propheta subiecit dicens: exaltabit mansuetos in salutem. exultabunt sancti in gloria et laetabuntur in cubilibus suis. et exultationes dei in gutture eorum et gladii bis acuti in manibus eorum ad faciendam uindictam in nationibus, increpationes in populis. ad alligandos reges eorum in manicis et conpedibus et nobiles eorum in uinculis ferreis; ut faciant in his iudicium conscriptum, gloria hsec est omnibus sanctis eius. hoc canticum nouum est, dei sanctos iudicii aeterni sumere potestatem. sancti enim secundum apostolum mundum iudicabunt. hoc igitur nouum cantatur a nobis, ultio in nationes, arguitio in populos, manicse et conpedes regum et nobilium uincula ferrea et conscripti in eos iudicii sententia.
The one hundred and forty-ninth psalm too sings a new song. And why this song is new the prophet at once added, saying: "He will exalt the meek unto salvation. The saints will exult in glory and rejoice on their couches. And the exultations of God are in their throat, and two-edged swords in their hands, to execute vengeance on the nations, rebukes on the peoples, to bind their kings in shackles and fetters and their nobles in iron chains, that they may execute on them the judgment written: this glory is for all his saints." This is the new song: that God's saints take the power of eternal judgment. For according to the apostle the saints will judge the world. This, then, is sung new by us: vengeance on the nations, reproof of the peoples, shackles and fetters of kings and iron chains of nobles, and the sentence of judgment written against them.
143.20CSEL 22:825
Quod etiam in huius psalmi nouo cantico simile cantatur: deus, cantionem nouam cantabo tibi. in psalterio decachordo psallam tibi, qui das salutem regibus. in decachordo igitur psalterio, id est, uel quod decem chordarum illud psalterium sit, uel quod decem uerborum organo atque gestis cantio noua ista cantatur, uel quod homo ipse decem quibusdam chordis, manibus ac pedibus extentus, perfectus spiritalium operum suorum gestu motuque sic psallat, ut cantionem hanc nouam cantet. qui das salutem regibus: regibus, quibus dictum est: uenite, benedicti patris mei, possidete praeparatum uobis regnum a constitutione mundi. qui nobiles ligabunt, qui reges manicis et conpedibus constringent, qui iudicabunt, arguent, uindicabunt.
And something similar is sung in the new song of this psalm: "O God, I will sing a new song to you; on a ten-stringed psaltery I will sing psalms to you, who give salvation to kings." On a ten-stringed psaltery, then: that is, either because that psaltery has ten strings, or because this new song is sung by the instrument and deeds of the ten words, or because man himself, stretched out on certain ten strings, his hands and feet, made perfect, sings psalms with the gesture and movement of his spiritual works in such a way that he sings this new song. "Who give salvation to kings": to the kings to whom it is said, "Come, you blessed of my Father, possess the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world"; who will bind the nobles, who will bind kings with shackles and fetters, who will judge, reprove, avenge.
143.21CSEL 22:825–826
Et quomodo salus regibus detur, ostendit: qui, inquit, liberas Dauid seruum tuum: eum nempe Dauid, de quo hic idem liber ex persona dei patris alio psalmo prophetat: posui adiutorium super potentem, exaltaui electum de plebe mea. inueni Dauid seruum meum. oleo sancto meo unxi eum. manus enim mea auxiliabitur illi. ipse inuocauit me: pater meus es tu, deus meus, susceptor salutis meae. et ego primogenitum ponam eum, excelsum super reges terrae. et sedes eius sicut sol in conspectu meo et sicut luna perfecta in aeternum et testis in cselo fidelis. et rursum in psalmo eodem ex persona eius ad patrem: sicut iurasti Dauid in ueritate tua, memor esto, domine, obprobrii serui tui, quod continui in sinu meo multarum gentium: quod exprobrauerunt inimici tui, domine, quod exprobrauerunt commutationem Christi tui. obprobria multarum gentium in sinum suum Dauid hic unus excepit. ipse enim peccata nostra suscepit et infirmitates nostras portauit: liuore eius nos sanati sumus. itaque dum hic Dauid liberatur et legi mortis eximitur, salus quoque regibus datur. ipse est enim primogenitus ex mortuis. et ut in Adam omnes morimur, ita et in Christo omnes resurgemus. liberatio ergo eius salus regum est. regnabunt enim conformes gloriae suse, per adsumptam ab eo naturse nostrae coniunctionem rursum omnes in naturae eius communione mansuri.
And how salvation is given to kings he shows: "who," he says, "deliver David your servant": that David, surely, of whom this same book prophesies in another psalm in the person of God the Father: "I have laid help upon one who is mighty; I have exalted one chosen from my people. I have found David my servant; with my holy oil I have anointed him. For my hand will help him. He has called upon me: You are my Father, my God, the upholder of my salvation. And I will make him the firstborn, high above the kings of the earth. And his throne is like the sun in my sight and like the full moon for ever, and a faithful witness in heaven." And again in the same psalm in his person to the Father: "As you swore to David in your truth, remember, O Lord, the reproach of your servant, which I have held in my bosom, of many nations, with which your enemies have reproached, O Lord, with which they have reproached the change of your Christ." This one David received into his bosom the reproaches of many nations. For he himself took up our sins and bore our weaknesses: by his bruise we have been healed. So while this David is delivered and released from the law of death, salvation too is given to kings. For he is the firstborn from the dead. And as in Adam we all die, so in Christ we shall all rise again. His deliverance, then, is the salvation of kings. For they will reign conformed to his glory, all to remain again in communion with his nature through the union of our nature assumed by him.
143.22CSEL 22:826–828
Eripitur ergo hic Dauid de gladio malignorum. spiritum enim Iesus posuit, cum uoluit; nec expectauit, ut animam inpressum uulnus emitteret. ius animae eius manus inreligiosa non habuit. ait enim: de gladio maligno erue me. quamquam enim exanimis iam corporis latus miles transfoderit, usus est ministerio sseuitise: ceterum potestas spiritus emittendi causam uiolandse in se animae non reliquit. 23. Consummat deinde cantionem nouam nouae confessionis hymno, terrena iudicia et saecularium bonorum gaudia falsa condemnans, cum ait: quorum os locutum est uanitatem. et dextera eorum dextera iniquitatis; quorum filii sicut nouella plantatio stabilita a iuuentute sua. filiae eorum conpositae, circumornatae quomodo similitudo templi. et promptuaria eorum plena, eructuantia ex hoc in illud. oues eorum fetosae, abundantes in egressionibus suis: boues eorum crassi. non est ruina macerise neque transitus neque clamor in plateis eorum. beatum dixerunt populum, cui haec sunt: beatus populus, cuius dominus deus eius. et haec sunt, quantum arbitror, huius saeculi bona communi uniuersorum beata iudicio, res saeculi loqui atque agere, rapere aut emere honores, ui, pretio falso ditescere, gloriari in adultse aetatis liberis, quorum exflorescentes anni nouellse exultationis firmitate confidant, optare speciosi corporis filias atque eas in modum templi damno inutili pecuniae ingentis ornare, multiplicatis horrea fructibus rumpere, quae congestas opes in promptuaria alia angusta his, quse in se conduntur, eructuent, geminare quoque oues fetibus uelle, quas egressas nullus ferse occursus inminuat, delectari boum suorum sagina, circumseptu etiam domorum firma praebere, ne transeundi per eum cuiquam sit potestas; non flere, non lugere, non gemere, sed prospero felicitatis suse cursu nulla aduersse calamitatis molestia inpediri. beatum hunc populum, cui hsec essent, dixerunt: sed propheta scit falsam esse huius beatitudinis opinionem. quid haec enim, hsec tot et tanta saeculi bona ad uitam, quae morte intercipienda esset, adquirent? et ideo, qui populus beatus esset, ostendit dicens: beatus populus, cuius dominus deus eius. deus ille dominus, qui, cum superiora haec et terrena praestiterit, aeternitatem tamen illis, qui his recte utentur, inpertiet; qui coheredes nos filii sui in ipso ante constitutionem saeculi elegit, qui erit deus omnia in omnibus: ipsi gloria, laus, honor, uirtus, imperium. patri in filio, filio in patre et in sancto spiritu et nunc et semper et in omnia saecula saeculorum. amen.
This David, then, is rescued from the evil sword. For Jesus laid down his spirit when he willed; nor did he wait for an inflicted wound to send forth his soul. The irreligious hand had no right over his soul. For he says: "Rescue me from the evil sword." For although the soldier pierced the side of the body already lifeless, he used the service of cruelty; but the power of sending forth the spirit left no cause for violence to be done to the soul in him. [23] Then he completes the new song with a hymn of new confession, condemning earthly judgments and the false joys of worldly goods, when he says: "whose mouth has spoken vanity, and their right hand is a right hand of iniquity; whose sons are like a new plantation established from their youth; their daughters adorned, decked out like the likeness of a temple; their storehouses full, overflowing from this to that; their sheep fruitful, abounding in their goings out; their oxen fat; there is no collapse of wall nor breach nor outcry in their streets. They called the people blessed who have these things: blessed is the people whose Lord is their God." And these, so far as I judge, are the goods of this world, blessed by the common judgment of all: to speak and do the affairs of the world, to seize or buy honors, to grow rich by force, by bribery, by fraud, to glory in children of grown age, whose flourishing years trust in the firmness of youthful exultation, to wish for daughters of beautiful body and to adorn them like a temple at useless expense of huge sums, to burst barns with multiplied fruits, which belch out heaped riches into other storehouses too narrow for what is stored in them, to wish also to double the sheep by their young, which no encounter with a wild beast diminishes when they go out, to delight in the fattening of one's oxen, to make the enclosures of houses firm so that no one has power to pass through; not to weep, not to mourn, not to groan, but to be hindered by no trouble of adverse calamity in the prosperous course of one's happiness. They called this people blessed who had these things; but the prophet knows that the opinion of this blessedness is false. For what will these so many and great goods of the world gain for a life that is to be cut off by death? And therefore he showed which people would be blessed, saying: "Blessed is the people whose Lord is their God": that God the Lord who, while he has given these higher and earthly things, will yet impart eternity to those who use them rightly; who chose us as fellow heirs of his Son in him before the foundation of the world; who will be God all in all: to him be glory, praise, honor, power, dominion, to the Father in the Son, to the Son in the Father, and in the Holy Spirit, now and always and for all ages of ages. Amen.
Tractates 144
144.1CSEL 22:828–829
Absolutus est psalmus, dei tantum laudibus occupatus. sed et titulus ipse solam contineri in psalmo praedicationem dei edocet. adiecto autem secundum gsercitatis consuetudinem nunc quoque, ut in ceteris aliis, pronomine ostendit illum Dauid isto laudante laudari. et quis hic sit, quem psalmus hic laudet, clamant omnium temporum omnes prophetise, ut hic ipse propheta saepe de eo ita contestatus est: sedes tua, deus, in saeculum saeculi: uirga aequitatis uirga regni tui dilexisti iustitiam et odisti iniquitatem: propterea unxit te deus, deus tuus. et rursum: et adorabunt eum omnes reges, et omnes gentes seruient ei. erit nomen eius benedictum in saecula, ante solem permanet nomen eius. et benedicentur in eo omnes tribus terrae, omnes gentes magnificabunt eum. huius igitur laus cantatur hoc psalmo, ex cuius persona dictum meminimus: ego autem constitutus sum rex ab eo super Sion montem sanctum eius. dominus dixit ad me: filius meus es tu, ego hodie genui te. posce a me, et dabo tibi gentes heriditatem tuam et possessionem tuam terminos terrse. reges eos in uirga ferrea. cuius regni perennitatem Daniel ita contestatus est dicens: et in diebus regum illorum excitabit deus caeli regnum aliud, quod numquam corrumpetur usque in saecula, et regnum eius alteri populo non relinquetur: comminuet et uentilabit omnia regna, et hoc regnum in aeternum. et rursum: et ecce cum nubibus cseli sicut filius hominis ueniens et usque ad uetustum dierum peruenit et oblatus est ei; et datus est ei principatus et honor et regnum: et omnes populi, tribus et linguse seruient ei, et potestas eius potestas perpetua, quae numquam transibit, et regnum eius non corrumpetur. hic igitur rex laudatur per ista, quae psalmo continentur: exaltabo te, deus meus et rex meus, et per illud: sancti tui confitebuntur tibi. gloriam regni tui dicent et potentiam tuam loquentur. notam faciant filiis hominum potentiam tuam et gloriam magnificentiae regni tui. regnum tuum regnum omnium saeculorum et dominatio tua in omni generatione et progenie.
The psalm is plain, occupied only with the praises of God. And the title itself teaches that only the proclamation of God is contained in the psalm. But here too, as in the others, by the article added according to the custom of the Greek, it shows that that David is praised by this David's praising. And who this is whom this psalm praises, all the prophecies of all times cry out, as this same prophet often testified of him thus: "Your throne, O God, is for ever and ever; the scepter of equity is the scepter of your kingdom. You have loved righteousness and hated iniquity; therefore God, your God, has anointed you." And again: "And all kings will worship him, and all nations will serve him. His name will be blessed for ever; his name remains before the sun. And all the tribes of the earth will be blessed in him; all nations will magnify him." The praise of this one, then, is sung in this psalm, in whose person we remember it was said: "But I have been established king by him over Zion, his holy mountain. The Lord said to me: You are my Son; today I have begotten you. Ask of me, and I will give you the nations as your inheritance and the ends of the earth as your possession. You will rule them with a rod of iron." The perpetuity of his kingdom Daniel attested thus, saying: "And in the days of those kings the God of heaven will raise up another kingdom, which will never be corrupted for ever, and its kingdom will not be left to another people; it will crush and winnow all kingdoms, and this kingdom will be for ever." And again: "And behold, with the clouds of heaven, one like a son of man coming, and he came to the Ancient of Days and was presented to him; and to him was given dominion and honor and kingdom; and all peoples, tribes, and tongues will serve him, and his power is an everlasting power, which will never pass away, and his kingdom will not be corrupted." This king, then, is praised by what is contained in the psalm: "I will exalt you, my God and my king," and by this: "Your saints will confess to you. They will tell the glory of your kingdom and speak of your power, to make known to the sons of men your power and the glory of the majesty of your kingdom. Your kingdom is a kingdom of all ages, and your dominion is in every generation and offspring."
144.2CSEL 22:829–830
Et quamquam hic ob aeterni regni gloriam, qua sanctis conregnantibus ipse regnabit, laus deo prophetae confessione cantetur, tamen ita laudationis ipsius ratio et ordo dispositus est, ut ea, quse de eo dicta sunt, ex sensu communis intellegentise praedicentur: ut, in quantum humani sermonis consuetudo permittit, de inmensa illa et inconprehensibili dei natura, licet non ad perfectam cognitionis ueritatem, tamen ad admirationem nos ingentis illius, quse eius est, uirtutis instituat. possumus enim eum maxime, quantum in nobis est, admirari: cognosci autem a nobis, quantus ipse est, non potest.
And although here praise is sung to God by the prophet's confession for the glory of the eternal kingdom, in which he will reign with the saints reigning together with him, yet the reasoning and order of the praise itself has been so arranged that what is said of him is proclaimed from the sense of common understanding: so that, as far as the habit of human speech allows, it may instruct us concerning that boundless and incomprehensible nature of God, if not to the perfect truth of knowledge, yet to wonder at that enormous power which is his. For we can wonder at him exceedingly, so far as lies in us; but how great he is cannot be known by us.
144.3CSEL 22:830
Verum cum in omni psalmo simplex dei et absoluta laudatio est, meminisse debemus patrem in filio et filium in patre laudari et, cum ex substantiae similitudine ac proprietate naturse alter in altero sit et ambo unum sint et qui uidet patrem, uideat et filium, non differre, quis ex duobus laudari existimetur, cum utrumque sibi inuicem et uirtutis atque operum similitudo et indifferentis naturae ex patre deo genita et filio deo nata diuinitas unum eos esse testetur.
But since in the whole psalm the praise of God is simple and absolute, we ought to remember that the Father is praised in the Son and the Son in the Father; and that, since from likeness of substance and property of nature each is in the other, and both are one, and he who sees the Father sees the Son too, it makes no difference which of the two is thought to be praised, since likeness of power and of works, and the divinity of undifferentiated nature, begotten from God the Father and born in God the Son, testify that they are one.
144.4CSEL 22:830–831
Coeptus ergo ita psalmus est: exaltabo te, deus meus et rex meus, et benedicam nomen tuum in saeculum et in sseculum saeculi. per singulos dies benedicam te et laudabo nomen tuum in saeculum et in saeculum saeculi. ratio et uirtus propheticae magniloquentiae per intentam audiendi diligentiam noscenda est. ait enim: exaltabo te, deus meus et rex meus. multi deum per ea, quse in operibus mundi ab eo instituti cognitioni nostrae sunt subiecta, magnificant: sed pauci sunt, qui regem sibi futurum uolunt credere, dum aut curam negant humanorum operum deo esse aut ad consolandam eorum, quae impie egerunt, conscientiam praesumpta animae et corporis abolitione nolunt diuinum in bonos et malos constitutum esse iudicium. sed propheta hinc praedicandi dei sumit exordium, quod sibi rex sit. sed et nunc quidem nomen eius, qui sibi rex atque deus sit, ob expectationem regni benedicit, cum ait: benedicam nomen tuum in sseculum. sed quia scit se gratiam deo atque regi suo etiam tum, cum in regno eius maneat, debere, quia demutata caduci corporis sui infirmitate depulsoque inimicae mortis imperio regi suo conformis et coseternus adsistat. adiecit: et in sseculum saeculi, id est in illo sseculo, quo habitu saeculi huius exempto iam ut saeculum saeculi seternitatis successione renouabitur.
The psalm, then, began thus: "I will exalt you, my God and my king, and I will bless your name for ever and for ever and ever. Every day I will bless you, and I will praise your name for ever and for ever and ever." The reasoning and force of the prophetic grandeur of speech must be learned through attentive diligence in listening. For he says: "I will exalt you, my God and my king." Many magnify God through those things of the works of the world established by him that are laid open to our knowledge; but few are willing to believe that he will be their king, since they either deny that God cares for human deeds or, to comfort their conscience for what they have done impiously, presuming the abolition of soul and body, refuse to have it that divine judgment has been established for the good and the bad. But the prophet takes the beginning of proclaiming God from this, that he is his king. And now indeed he blesses the name of him who is his king and God because of the expectation of the kingdom, when he says, "I will bless your name for ever." But since he knows that he owes thanks to God and his king even then, when he remains in his kingdom, because, the weakness of his perishable body changed and the rule of hostile death driven out, he will stand conformed and coeternal with his king, he added: "and for ever and ever," that is, in that age in which, the fashion of this age being removed, it will be renewed as an age of ages by the succession of eternity.
144.5CSEL 22:831
Et in hoc quidem sseculo quisquam benedicens deum potest non semper in benedictionis officio permanere, dum aut luctu impeditur aut metu occupatur aut aegritudine anxius detinetur et aut torpescente animo aut ingrato in benedictionibus dei mutus est, sed perfectio prophetalis fidei ab istius modi infirmitatum demutationibus libera est dicens: per singulos dies benedicam te. nullum uacuum habet tempus et dies ei nulla est otiosa, quin semper in benedictionum confessione uersetur. accidit autem frequenter, ut de quibus loqui bene possimus, laudare eos non possimus. abstinere a malo benedictione dignum est. sed solum malum non admittere non habet laudem, nisi mali abstinentiam etiam gloria boni operis consequatur. et beneficum quidem in nos benedicere possumus, quia natura exigit, non obtrectare nos illis, quorum beniuolentia confouemur; sed si et aliis uitiis aspersi sunt, nostro quidem commodo benedicuntur, sed ueri iudicio non praedicantur. perfectio autem dei nihil in se esse patitur pro parte. nam ut benedictus, ita et laudabilis est habens et ex his, quibus beneficentia in nos sua utimur, benedictionis nostrae confessionem et ex perfectarum in se uirtutum admiratione praeconium. ob quod benedicturus per dies singulos propheta etiam id adiecit: et laudabo nomen tuum in sseculum et in saeculum saeculi. cum benedicit, cum laudat in saeculum saeculi, in nullo prophetae officium infirmum est nec benedictione nec laude nec tempore.
And in this age anyone blessing God may not always remain in the duty of blessing, while he is either hindered by grief, or seized by fear, or held anxious by sickness, and, his mind either sluggish or ungrateful, is mute in the blessings of God; but the perfection of prophetic faith is free from such changes of weaknesses, saying: "Every day I will bless you." He has no empty time, and no day is idle for him, but he is always engaged in the confession of blessings. It often happens, however, that those of whom we can speak well we cannot praise. To abstain from evil is worthy of blessing. But merely not committing evil has no praise unless the glory of good work also follows the abstaining from evil. And we can bless one who is beneficent to us, because nature requires that we not disparage those by whose goodwill we are cherished; but if they are also stained with other vices, they are blessed indeed for our advantage, but are not praised by the judgment of truth. But the perfection of God allows nothing in him to be partial. For as he is blessed, so too he is praiseworthy, having both the confession of our blessing from the things in which we enjoy his beneficence toward us, and proclamation from wonder at the perfect virtues in him. For which reason the prophet, about to bless every day, added this too: "and I will praise your name for ever and for ever and ever." When he blesses, when he praises for ever and ever, the prophet's duty is weak in nothing, neither in blessing nor in praise nor in time.
144.6CSEL 22:831–832
Dehinc sequitur: magnus dominus et laudabilis ualde, et magnitudinis eius non est finis. hsec dei prima et praecipua laudatio est, quod nihil in se mediocre, nihil circumscriptum, nihil emensum et magnitudinis suse habeat et laudis. uirtus eius opinione non clauditur, locis non continetur, nominibus non enuntiatur, temporibus non subditur: artus ad id sensus noster est, ingenium hebes est, sermo mutus est. finem magnificentia ipsius nescit, et aliquam emetiendi se opinionem inmensa magnitudo non patitur. extenta ubique, extenta semper est, hanc habens infinitatis suse laudem. ceterum omnem intellegentiam infinitae huius in se qualitatis excedens.
Then follows: "Great is the Lord and exceedingly praiseworthy, and of his greatness there is no end." This is the first and chief praise of God: that he has nothing in himself moderate, nothing circumscribed, nothing measured, either of his greatness or of his praise. His power is not enclosed by opinion, not contained by places, not expressed by names, not subject to times: our sense is too narrow for it, our wit dull, our speech mute. His magnificence knows no end, and his boundless greatness does not allow any notion of measuring it. It extends everywhere, it extends always, having this praise of its infinity; but it exceeds all understanding of this infinite quality in itself.
144.7CSEL 22:832
Et quia haec uel inmensse magnitudinis cognitio uel laudatio operum dei non omnium gentium est, quibus a constitutione mundi uita et sensus fuisset futuraque esset, consequenter subiecit: generatio et generatio laudabit opera tua. non utique generationes et generationes, quae et temporibus et gentibus multae atque diuersse sunt, sed generatio, quse ab Abraham coepit, quae per signum circumcisionis deputatur in legem, et generatio, quae renouatur in Christo, quae ex doctrinis propheticis ad fidem euangelicse iustificationis instruitur. harum igitur generationum proprium est dei opera laudare.
And since this knowledge of boundless greatness, or praise of God's works, does not belong to all the nations who have had and will have life and sense from the foundation of the world, he consequently added: "Generation and generation will praise your works." Not, of course, generations and generations, which are many and diverse in times and nations, but the generation that began from Abraham, which through the sign of circumcision is assigned to the law, and the generation that is renewed in Christ, which is instructed from the prophetic teachings for the faith of Gospel justification. It is proper to these generations, then, to praise the works of God.
144.8CSEL 22:832
Laudari autem opera dei non alia ratio admonet quam quod omnia ab eo potenter effecta sunt, quia prseconium habeat non aliquid egisse, sed potenter egisse. et ideo subiecit: et potentiam tuam pronuntiabunt.
No other reason admonishes that the works of God be praised than that all were mightily done by him, since they have proclamation not for having done something but for having done it mightily. And therefore he added: "And they will declare your might."
144.9CSEL 22:832
Sed potentia operum ea demum praedicanda est, quae magnificentiae exaequetur operantis, ut potentis magnificentia potens intellegatur operatio. ob quod consequitur: et magnificentiam maiestatis tuae.
But the might of the works is to be proclaimed only when it is matched to the magnificence of the worker, so that the working may be understood as mighty by the magnificence of the mighty one. For which reason there follows: "and the magnificence of your majesty."
144.10CSEL 22:832–833
Sed magnificentia, si quod in se est tantum sibi habeat, habet admirationem, non habet laudem; et otiosa aliis est potentis operatio, nisi per operantis sanctitatem usum aliquem ex se illis, qui laudabunt et admirabuntur, inpertiet. ex quo conpetenter hoc sequitur: et sanctitatem tuam loquentur. et sanctitas quidem iam bona est neque tantum sibi proficit neque hoc, quod ex se est, intra usum commodi proprii consumit. nam etiam ad prouocandam in se aliorum beneficentiam sanctitatis officiis sese ipsa commendat. sed nihil de se dignum admiratione praestabit, si sibi sola sit. at uero hoc proprium est et admirabile sanctitatis, cum hoc, quod in se est, in usum aliorum, quibus est sancta, concedat, ipsa aliquo non egens, nisi forte per beniuolentiam eo tantum, ut se alius utatur. ad id ergo, quod dictum est: et sanctitatem tuam loquentur, merito subiecit: et mirabilia tua narrabunt.
But magnificence, if it has only for itself what is in it, has wonder but not praise; and the working of the mighty one is idle for others unless, through the holiness of the worker, it imparts some use from itself to those who will praise and wonder. From this there fittingly follows: "and they will speak of your holiness." And holiness is indeed good and does not profit only itself nor consume what is from itself within the use of its own advantage. For it commends itself by the duties of holiness even to provoke others' beneficence toward itself. But it will offer nothing worthy of wonder from itself if it is for itself alone. But this is proper and wonderful in holiness: when it grants what is in it for the use of others, for whom it is holy, itself needing nothing, except perhaps, out of goodwill, only that another should use it. To the saying, then, "and they will speak of your holiness," he rightly added: "and they will tell your wonders."
144.11CSEL 22:833
Et mirabile quidem est sanctitatem nihil sibi proficientem in usum alienae beatitudinis exuberare; sed mirabilius est sanctitatem plenam esse terroris; ne, si non indiscretam se utentibus aut abundantibus praestet, dum bonis ac malis promiscua est, tamquam ex naturae necessitate se praebens, admirationem non habeat sanctitatis. et idcirco mox subdidit: et uirtutem terribilium tuorum dicent: ut sanctitatem loquentes et mirabilia narrantes dicant quoque terribilium uirtutem, media admiratione inter sanctitatem atque terrorem, dum et terror suauis et terribilis suauitas admirabilem facit et terrorem suauem et terribilem suauitatem.
And it is indeed wonderful that holiness, profiting itself nothing, should overflow for the use of another's blessedness; but it is more wonderful that holiness should be full of terror; lest, if it offered itself indiscriminately to those who use or abound in it, being shared alike by good and bad, as if offering itself by necessity of nature, it should not have the wonder of holiness. And therefore he at once added: "and they will tell the power of your terrible deeds": so that those who speak of holiness and tell of wonders may also tell the power of terrible deeds, wonder standing between holiness and terror, since both a sweet terror and a terrible sweetness make the terror sweet and the sweetness terrible worthy of wonder.
144.12CSEL 22:833
Ob quod ingentem hanc admirandae temperationis magnitudinem propheta intellegens subiecit: et magnitudinem tuam narrabunt. magnitudinis enim infinitae est in deo, quod terribile est, suaue esse et, quod suaue est, esse terribile. magnitudo autem non habet modum, ne, si moderata sit, iam magnitudo non sit per id, quod modo non caret. ut ergo propriae admiratio sanctitatis atque terroris in magnitudinis suae infinitate consistat, mansura est et semper et abundans nec tempore definita nec copia. et idcirco conexuit: memoriam abundantise suauitatis tuae eructuabunt: quia nec memoria obliuione intercipitur, nec abundantia per inopiam detrahitur.
For which reason the prophet, understanding the enormous greatness of this wonderful tempering, added: "and they will tell your greatness." For it belongs to infinite greatness in God that what is terrible is sweet and what is sweet is terrible. And greatness has no measure, lest, if it were measured, it should no longer be greatness, through not lacking measure. So that, then, the wonder of his own holiness and terror may consist in the infinity of his greatness, it will remain both always and abundant, defined neither by time nor by quantity. And therefore he joined: "They will pour forth the memory of the abundance of your sweetness": because neither is memory cut off by forgetfulness, nor is abundance diminished by want.
144.13CSEL 22:833–834
Tenuit autem ordinem propheta rationis, ut memoriam et abundantiam suauitatis condicione et moderatae et conseruatae magnitudinis temperaret dicens: et iustitia tua exultabunt. infinita quidem est memoria et abundantia suauitatis, quia nequaquam deus aut obliuiscitur esse suauis aut desinit; sed infinitatem memoriae atque abundantise iustitia interiecta moderatur. moderatur autem non praebendi modo, sed utendi: dum, quod per abundantiam et memoriam dei semper aequis omnibus patet, id ab iniquis utendi indignitate non capitur. sanctitas dei iter populo suo diuiso mari praebuit; sed eadem sanctitas et terribilis fuit uirtus, cum ingressis in ipsum iter impiis, ubi fuerat salus religiosorum, ibi poena constitit impiorum. circumstant alios firmitate muri solidatae undse; alios refusae ipsae illae, quse constiterant, absorbent. ad istos pelagus naturam suam nescit; hos per naturam suam punit. ad istos ex mari terra est; istis, quod erat, mare est. horum salus sanctitas est: horum mors terror est. aut cum tribus pueris in camino cantantibus circumstantes flammis, quas illi non sentiunt, aduruntur, illis in roris humorem ignis temperatur, hos exaestuans ignis conburit. ipsae intus extraque flammse sunt, quarum pro diuersitate meritorum et deficit a se natura, nec deficit. nam quod est, manet erga eos ignis esse, quos urit; et quod non est, necesse est in his esse, quibus ros est. atque ita magnitudinem memoriae et sanctitatis dei iustitia sola moderatur, cum per iustitiam dei ad iniquos atque iustos et terrorem sanctitas et terror temperet sanctitatem.
The prophet kept the order of reasoning, so as to temper the memory and abundance of sweetness by the condition of a greatness both moderated and preserved, saying: "and they will exult in your righteousness." The memory and abundance of sweetness are indeed infinite, since God in no way either forgets to be sweet or ceases to be; but righteousness, set between, moderates the infinity of memory and abundance. It moderates not the measure of giving but of using: since what through God's abundance and memory always lies open to all the just is not received by the wicked because of their unworthiness to use it. God's holiness provided a way for his people when the sea was divided; but the same holiness was also a terrible power, when, the impious having entered the same way, where the salvation of the religious had been, there the punishment of the impious took place. The waves, made solid, surround some with the firmness of a wall; the same waves that had stood, poured back, swallow up others. Toward the one the sea does not know its nature; the others it punishes by its nature. For the one, earth comes from the sea; for the others, what was sea remains sea. The salvation of the one is holiness; the death of the other is terror. Or when, with the three youths singing in the furnace, those standing around are burned by the flames which the youths do not feel, for them the fire is tempered into the moisture of dew, while it burns the others as it blazes. The same flames are within and without, whose nature, according to the difference of merits, both fails from itself and does not fail. For what it is, it remains: fire toward those it burns; and what it is not, it must be in those for whom it is dew. And so righteousness alone moderates the greatness of the memory and holiness of God, since through God's righteousness toward the wicked and the righteous holiness tempers terror and terror holiness.
144.14CSEL 22:834–835
Et iustitia quidem [hominum] recta atque utilis est; sed tamen eadem ipsa aliquando praedura est, ita ut sibi uti bonitate non liceat, dum pro diuersitate iudicii decernendo, quod iustum est, fit seuera. sed dei iustitia iustitise non cosequatur humanae. neque enim naturae legi subdita est, per quam est lex statuta naturae: ut necessitatem non habeat bona non esse, cum iusta sit. habet dei iustitia miserandi uoluntatem; neque tamen per miserandi uoluntatem ita a se erit demutata, ne iustitia sit. humana autem iustitia solet in id deuenire, ne misericors sit, et misericordia ita se praestare, ne iusta sit. misericordia enim non erit [iusta], si miserabiliter inope calumniante ius opulentiori inuideas, si feminse lacrimas uiri prseferas contumeliae, si caeci conuicia non putes arguenda. at uero e contrario misericordiam iustitia non tenebit, si furem unius nummi ut furem ingentis thesauri plectes, cum tamen in uno nummo thesaurum habuerit, qui amisit, uel adolescentem uno tantum et eodem infamis adulterio inretitum pari in morte, ut plurium adulteriorum artificem, poenarum quaestione nexabis, cum tamen crimen sit mortis in utroque. haec atque istiusmodi inperfectam faciunt et misericordiam et iustitiam humanam; dei autem iustitiam misericordem praestat criminosorum poenis indulta patientia. qui, cum contra morem humanae inpatientise non festinat punire, miseratus est: tenens iustitiam in poena post misericordiam non proficiente patientia, habens misericordiam in poena post patientiam exerendo iustitiam. non enim deus rapit humanorum criminum occasiones neque tamquam infirmitatis nostrae naturaeque nescius ipsum illud ad poenam erroris et peccati nostri tempus inuadit: sed dissimulat et differt et paenitentiae solacium dilatione ultionis expectat, suauem se omnibus praestans, dum per misericordiae et iustitise modum temperandae seueritatis indulgentiae se reseruat.
And righteousness is indeed right and useful; but yet this same sometimes becomes too harsh, so that it is not allowed to use kindness, as, in deciding what is just according to the diversity of judgment, it becomes severe. But the righteousness of God does not follow human righteousness. For it is not subject to the law of nature, through which the law of nature was established: so that it is under no necessity of not being good because it is just. God's righteousness has the will to show mercy; yet through the will to show mercy it will not be so changed from itself as not to be righteousness. But human righteousness often comes to the point of not being merciful, and mercy so offers itself as not to be just. For mercy will not be such if, when a needy man brings a pitiable false charge, you begrudge the richer man his right; if you prefer a woman's tears to a man's injury; if you think the insults of a blind man are not to be rebuked. But on the contrary, righteousness will not keep mercy if you punish the thief of one coin like the thief of a huge treasure, though he who lost it had his treasure in the one coin; or if you bind a young man caught in one and the same infamous adultery to an equal death under examination by torture, like the contriver of many adulteries, though there is a crime worthy of death in both. These and such things make human mercy and righteousness imperfect; but patience granted toward the punishments of the guilty makes God's righteousness merciful. When, contrary to the habit of human impatience, he does not hasten to punish, he has shown mercy: keeping righteousness in punishment after patience has availed nothing, having mercy in punishment by exercising righteousness after patience. For God does not seize upon occasions of human crimes, nor, as though ignorant of our weakness and nature, does he rush upon the very moment of our error and sin to punish it; but he overlooks and defers, and awaits the comfort of repentance by delaying vengeance, showing himself sweet to all, while through the measure of mercy and righteousness he reserves himself for the indulgence of a severity to be tempered.
144.15CSEL 22:835–836
Hoc in deo praecipuum, hoc in potente laudandum: non caelum fecisse, quia potens est; non terram fundasse, quia uirtus est; non annum astris temperasse, quia sapiens est; non hominem animasse, quia uita est; non mare in accessus ac decessus mouisse, quia spiritus est: sed misericordem esse, qui iustus est; sed miserantem esse, qui rex est; sed dissimulantem esse, qui deus est. ad id enim, quod dictum est: iustitia tua exultabunt, tamquam necessarium sequitur: miserator et misericors dominus est. patiens et multse misericordise. suauis dominus uniuersis, et miserationes eius super omnia opera eius. quod enim potens est, naturae suae uirtus est: quod autem misericors est, salutis nostrae profectus est. et plus est non suis uti, sed aliis praestitisse, quae sua sunt; atque ideo praestat ceteris dei operibus misericordia, quia magnifica eius operatio uirtutis suae res est, misericordia uero eius usus alienus est.
This is chief in God, this is to be praised in the mighty one: not that he made heaven, because he is mighty; not that he founded the earth, because he is power; not that he tempered the year by the stars, because he is wise; not that he gave life to man, because he is life; not that he moved the sea to ebb and flow, because he is spirit: but that he who is just is merciful; that he who is king is compassionate; that he who is God overlooks. For to the saying, "they will exult in your righteousness," there follows as if necessarily: "The Lord is compassionate and merciful, patient and of great mercy. The Lord is sweet to all, and his compassions are over all his works." For that he is mighty is the power of his nature; but that he is merciful is the advancement of our salvation. And it is more not to use one's own but to have given to others what is one's own; and therefore mercy surpasses God's other works, because his magnificent working is a matter of his own power, but his mercy is for the use of others.
144.16CSEL 22:836
Ob quod tamquam in apice ipso diuinarum ob misericordiam laudium propheta consistens debitum deo honorem ueluti publicae confessionis ostendit dicens: confiteantur tibi, domine, omnia opera tua, et sancti tui confiteantur tibi. gloriam regni tui dicent et potentiam tuam loquentur: ut notam faciant filiis hominum potentiam tuam et gloriam magnificentiae regni tui. regnum tuum regnum omnium sseculorum, et dominatio tua in omni generatione et progenie. dignus prophetica magniloquentia ordo dictorum est. opera deum confitentur: quam magnificus enim sit, operum et creaturse magnificentia confitetur. sed confitentur et sancti, quibus rex esse dignatur. gloriam regni elocuntur, ne ignorata non desideretur usuris. magnificentiam quoque gloriae regni dei nuntiant, ne desperetur seterna. dominatus etiam in generationem et generationem ostenditur, ut se dominatui intellegat coseternam. atque ita cognitio dei in operibus est, sanctorum officium in doctrina est, prophetise usus in prsedicatione est, regni gloria in aeternitate dominatus est, dominatus seternitas eos necesse est habeat, in quos agatur aeternus.
For which reason the prophet, standing as it were at the very summit of divine praises because of mercy, shows the honor due to God as by a public confession, saying: "Let all your works confess to you, O Lord, and let your saints confess to you. They will tell the glory of your kingdom and speak of your power, to make known to the sons of men your power and the glory of the majesty of your kingdom. Your kingdom is a kingdom of all ages, and your dominion is in every generation and offspring." The order of the words is worthy of prophetic grandeur. The works confess God: for the magnificence of the works and of creation confesses how magnificent he is. But the saints too confess, whose king he deigns to be. They speak the glory of the kingdom, lest, unknown, it not be desired by those who will enjoy it. They also announce the magnificence of the glory of God's kingdom, lest the eternal be despaired of. The dominion too is shown in generation and generation, so that one may understand himself to be coeternal with the dominion. And so the knowledge of God is in the works, the duty of the saints is in teaching, the use of prophecy is in proclamation, the glory of the kingdom is in the eternity of dominion; and the eternity of dominion must have those over whom the Eternal exercises it.
144.17CSEL 22:836–837
Atque ad id spebus fidelibus expetendum adhortatio prophetae continuo subiecta est: fidelis dominus in uerbis suis et sanctus in omnibus operibus suis. uerborum fides forte nutaret, nisi sanctitas operibus esset admixta. atque ita sanctitas in operibus fidem confirmat in uerbis, ut de sancti fide in promissis non ambigas, cuius sanctitate utaris in rebus. si enim sanctum esse deum intellegimus per id, quod nascimur, uiuimus, alimur et copiis omnibus humanae naturse congruis abundamus, sanctitas ista esse non potest infidelis in dictis.
And to make the faithful seek this with hope, the prophet's exhortation is at once added: "The Lord is faithful in his words and holy in all his works." Faith in words might perhaps waver unless holiness were mixed with works. And so holiness in works confirms faith in words, so that you may not doubt the faithfulness in promises of the Holy One whose holiness you enjoy in deeds. For if we understand that God is holy through the fact that we are born, live, are nourished, and abound in all the resources fitting human nature, this holiness cannot be unfaithful in its sayings.
144.18CSEL 22:837
Scit autem propheta esse et aliud sanctitatis dei opus in eo, quod sequitur: suffulcit dominus omnes, qui ruunt, et corrigit omnes elisos. adest omnibus dei sanctitas et se humanis auxiliis non subtrahit. sed seruat etiam nunc iustitise et misericordise propheta rationem. suffulcit enim dominus non conlapsos, sed cadentes, quos, etsi trahat pronus naturae lapsus in casum, paenitentia tamen, quae auctor est desinendi, ne penitus iam ceciderint, sistet in lapsu. ruere enim, non ruisse potest in id confirmatum esse, ne ruerit.
But the prophet knows there is another work of God's holiness too, in what follows: "The Lord upholds all who are falling, and sets upright all who are dashed down." God's holiness is present to all and does not withdraw itself from helping men. But even now the prophet keeps the reasoning of righteousness and mercy. For the Lord upholds not those who have collapsed but those who are falling, whom, even if the downward slope of nature drags them toward a fall, repentance, which is the author of ceasing, will yet stop in their slipping, so that they may not already have fallen completely. For one who is falling, not one who has fallen, can be strengthened so as not to fall.
144.19CSEL 22:837
Sed et eriguntur allisi. differt autem ui exteriore conlidi et ruisse suo casu. alliditur namque ille, quem per diaboli instinctum calens aetas praecipitauit in casum, quem ignoratio conpulit in errorem, quem fraudulentis usa blanditiis naturae infirmitas egit in crimen. hic potius eliditur, quam ille, qui uoluntate permanserit, quem hic uitiorum usus oblectet, quem non paeniteat admissi. habet enim uenise apud deum solacium psenituisse de gestis, nec temperamento seueritatis indignum est, quod per admissi dolorem adfectum ita profitetur inuiti.
But those dashed down are also raised up. To be dashed down by an outside force differs from having fallen by one's own fall. For he is dashed down whom heated youth, at the devil's prompting, has thrown headlong into a fall, whom ignorance has driven into error, whom the weakness of nature, using deceitful flatteries, has driven into crime. Such a one is dashed down, rather than he who has remained so by will, whom the habit of vices delights, who does not repent of what he has done. For to have repented of one's deeds has the comfort of pardon with God, nor is it unworthy of a tempering of severity, what thus declares, by grief over what was committed, the disposition of one unwilling.
144.20CSEL 22:837–838
Et cur cadentes suffulciat et allisos corrigat, consequentibus docet dicens: oculi omnium in te sperant. et tu das escam illorum in tempore oportuno. aperis tu manum tuam et inples omnem animam benedictione. totis itaque in deum allisi et cadentes oculis aspectant; neque quisquam ita de se confidat, ut non semper cadere, semper se uereatur allidi. ab illo sperandum est, ne casu periclitemur, ne allidamur infirmitate naturae. omnia autem nobis uitse subsidia ex ipso sunt, cum ex oportunitate fructuum indultis cibis uiuimus, cum manum aperiendo animas nostras donis spiritalibus replet: etenim ex uirtutis suae fonte copia in nos eorum, quse sibi beneplacita sunt, exuberat. quod utrumque in his, quse consecuntur, discernit ita: iustus dominus in omnibus uiis suis et sanctus in omnibus operibus suis. iustus in uiis est, cum infirmitatem nostram in aeternum regnum suum confirmata donorum spiritalium communione deducit; sanctus autem in operibus suis, cum uniuersis fructus in temporum oportunitate subpeditat: sanctitatem suam in omnium alimonia docens, iustitiam uero in replendis beneplacito animis conseruans.
And why he upholds the falling and sets upright the dashed down, he teaches in what follows, saying: "The eyes of all hope in you, and you give them their food in due season. You open your hand and fill every soul with blessing." So the dashed down and the falling look to God with their whole eyes; and let no one so trust in himself as not always to fear falling, always to fear being dashed down. From him must we hope that we be not endangered by a fall, that we be not dashed down by the weakness of nature. All the supports of life are from him, when we live by food granted in the season of fruits, when by opening his hand he fills our souls with spiritual gifts: for from the spring of his power the abundance of what pleases him overflows to us. Both of these he distinguishes in what follows, thus: "The Lord is just in all his ways and holy in all his works." He is just in his ways when he leads our weakness, strengthened by the fellowship of spiritual gifts, into his eternal kingdom; and holy in his works when he supplies fruits to all in the season of times: showing his holiness in the nourishment of all, but keeping his righteousness in filling souls with good pleasure.
144.21CSEL 22:838
Post quae sequitur: prope est dominus inuocantibus eum. non longe abest, qui per naturae suae uirtutem et ipse ubique semper est, et totus semper et ubique est secundum illud Apostoli: quia in ipso sumus et in ipso uiuimus ac mouemur. prope est ergo inuocantibus, cum nihil sit, quod sine eo sit. sed quibus inuocantibus prope sit, subiectis docet: omnibus inuocantibus eum in ueritate. non ex otio inuocantibus neque ex infidelis ambiguitatis incerto, sed uerum deum fideli inuocantibus ueritate.
After which follows: "The Lord is near to those who call upon him." He is not far away who, by the power of his nature, is himself always everywhere, and is always whole and everywhere, according to that saying of the apostle: "For in him we are, and in him we live and move." He is near, then, to those who call upon him, since there is nothing that is without him. But to whom he is near when they call, he teaches in what is added: "to all who call upon him in truth": not to those who call from idleness nor from the uncertainty of unbelieving doubt, but to those who call upon the true God with faithful truth.
144.22CSEL 22:838–839
Et cum prope adsit, quid in ueritate se inuocantibus tribuat, demonstrat dicens: uoluntatem timentium se faciet; non turpium uoluntates neque uitiosorum cupiditates deus faciet, sed timentium se, per metum innocentes, per fidem honestas, per reuerentiam uerecundas; et uoluntates non otiosas neque sperare aliquid a se quodam contemptu silentii dedignantes, sed quas eloquatur oratio, quas preces contestentur. et ideo subiecit: et orationem eorum exaudiet. uoluntas ergo ea a deo fit, quae uoce orationis exauditur. sed quse uoluntas fiet orantium? et saluos faciet, inquit, eos. hoc uolunt timentes deum, hoc ut audiantur orant, ut non dominetur eorum aeterna mors, non in interitum perpetui iudicii deputentur, sed sub custodia dei tuti sint. sequitur enim: custodit deus diligentes ipsum. saluos ergo faciet eos custodiendo, id est aeterni regni participes reseruando; sed eos, qui et timebunt et precabuntur et diligent. dehinc sequitur: et omnes peccatores disperdet, qui nec ut homines timuerint nec ut subditi orauerint nec ut donati uita mundoque dilexerint.
And since he is near, he shows what he grants to those who call on him in truth, saying: "He will do the will of those who fear him." God will not do the wills of the base nor the desires of the vicious, but of those who fear him: wills innocent through fear, honorable through faith, modest through reverence; and wills that are not idle, nor that disdain, by a kind of contemptuous silence, to hope for anything from him, but such as prayer expresses and entreaties attest. And therefore he added: "and he will hear their prayer." The will done by God, then, is that which is heard through the voice of prayer. But what will of those who pray will be done? "And he will save them," it says. This is what those who fear God want; this they pray to be heard for: that eternal death may not rule over them, that they may not be assigned to destruction by everlasting judgment, but may be safe under God's guard. For there follows: "God guards those who love him." He will save them, then, by guarding them, that is, by keeping them as sharers of the eternal kingdom; but those who will both fear and pray and love. Then follows: "and he will destroy all sinners," who neither feared as men, nor prayed as subjects, nor loved as those given life and the world.
144.23CSEL 22:839–840
Conclusit autem propheta honoris debiti confessionem dicens: laudationem domini loquetur os meum. laudatio ei non sufficit, nisi et laudare non desinat. laudabit enim adhuc, cum iam tamen laudet. sed cum ille laudet, omne quoque ad benedictionem dei humanum genus adhortatur: et benedicat omnis caro nomen sanctum eius. per officii sui et fidei constantiam semper quidem ille laudabit; sed prophetae cura, ut omnes deum benedicant, optat. non enim ait: benedicent, tamquam certus sit in futurum, sed ex uoti adfectu ait: benedicant, et illud, potius ut intelligeretur optare, quam confideret sic futurum. deinde benedictionem non temporariam esse postulat, sed aeternam, in sseculum et in saeculum sseculi. nobis potius optandum, ut in aeternum benedicamus aeternum: quia in aeternum benedicens aeterno illi necesse est maneat coseternus, domino scilicet nostro unigenito et primogenito dei filio Iesu Christo, qui est benedictus in saecula saeculorum. amen.
The prophet concluded the confession of due honor, saying: "My mouth will speak the praise of the Lord." Praise is not enough for him unless he also does not cease to praise. For he will praise still, though he praises already. But while he praises, he also urges the whole human race to bless God: "And let all flesh bless his holy name." Through the constancy of his duty and faith he indeed will always praise; but the prophet's care desires that all should bless God. For he does not say "they will bless," as though certain of the future, but from the feeling of a wish he says "let them bless," so that he might be understood rather to wish than to trust it would be so. Then he asks that the blessing be not temporary but eternal, "for ever and for ever and ever." Rather must we wish that we may bless the Eternal for ever: because one who blesses the Eternal for ever must remain coeternal with him, our Lord, namely, the only-begotten and firstborn Son of God, Jesus Christ, who is blessed for ever and ever. Amen.
Tractates 145
145.1CSEL 22:840
Etiam huic psalmo addere aliquid translatoribus uisum est. nam cum Hebrseis sola alleluia sit praelata confessio, illis placuit Aggaeum et Zachariam in titulo anteferre: hoc eo, ut psalmum esse propheticum nosceremus, quia per hos prophetas, sub quibus sedificata rursum Hierusalem est, ipso illo tum tempore aeternae Hierusalem sedificatio praedicatur, etiam euangelio testante, cum ingressuro templum domino et nummulariorum mensas et ementium ac uendentium negotia subuersuro ita scriptum est: hoc autem factum est, ut impleretur quod dictum est per Zachariam prophetam dicentem: dicite filise Sion: ecce rex tuus uenit tibi mansuetus, sedens super asinam et pullum nouellum subiugalem.
To this psalm too the translators saw fit to add something. For while among the Hebrews only the confession "Alleluia" stands at the head, they chose to set Haggai and Zechariah in the title: this so that we might know the psalm to be prophetic, because through these prophets, under whom Jerusalem was built again, the building of the eternal Jerusalem is proclaimed at that very time, the Gospel too testifying, when, as the Lord was about to enter the temple and overturn the tables of the money changers and the dealings of buyers and sellers, it is written thus: "This was done that what was spoken through the prophet Zechariah might be fulfilled, saying: Say to the daughter of Zion: Behold, your king comes to you, meek, sitting on a she-ass and a young foal, the colt of a beast of burden."
145.2CSEL 22:840–841
Et, ut arbitror, huius Hierusalem potius et Sion regem psalmus ostendit, qui ita coepit: lauda, anima mea, dominum, laudabo dominum in uita mea: psallam deo meo, quamdiu ero. scienter et de prophetae doctrina dictorum ordinem tenuit. primum enim animam hortatur ad laudem, quse in hanc est constituta naturam, ut maneat aeterna tum deinde, quia per donum resurrectionis glorificato corpore totum se ei meminerit coseternum, tamquam de futuro confidens ait: laudabo dominum in uita mea. non enim ea uita, quae nunc est per infirmitates corporis, sua est; ab Adam namque ista coepit, non cum Adam inchoata est, quam non uitam, sed mortem esse apostolus nouit dicens: miser ego homo, quis me liberabit a corpore mortis huius? in hac ergo uita sua deum, qualis primum in homine est instituta, laudabit. tum tertio, ne in hoc eodem nunc corpore inreligiosus existimaretur, adiecit: psallam deo meo, quam diu ero. in omni autem hoc psalmorum libro in psallere religiosas operationes corporis significari meminimus apta et consona corporei motus uarietate placituri.
And, as I think, the psalm shows rather the king of this Jerusalem and Zion; it begins thus: "Praise the Lord, O my soul; I will praise the Lord in my life; I will sing psalms to my God as long as I shall be." Knowingly and from the prophet's teaching he kept the order of the words. For first he exhorts the soul to praise, which has been established in this nature, that it remain eternal; then, since through the gift of the resurrection, the body glorified, he will remember that he is wholly coeternal with God, he says, as one confident about the future: "I will praise the Lord in my life." For the life that now is, through the weaknesses of the body, is not his own; for it began from Adam, it was not begun with Adam; and the apostle knows it to be not life but death, saying: "Wretched man that I am, who will deliver me from the body of this death?" In this his own life, then, such as it was first established in man, he will praise God. Then third, lest he be thought irreligious in this same body now, he added: "I will sing psalms to my God as long as I shall be." And in all this book of Psalms we remember that by "singing psalms" the religious workings of the body are signified, intending to please by a fitting and harmonious variety of bodily movement.
145.3CSEL 22:841
Post quae stultas hominum opiniones et inanes in regum nominibus religiones, quos sibi deos antiquitas finxit, redarguit dicens: nolite confidere in principibus et in filiis hominum, quibus non est salus. exibit spiritus eorum et reuertentur in terram suam: in illa die peribunt omnes cogitationes eorum. confidere uetuit in regibus. et quibus regibus? subiecit: et in filiis, inquit, hominum. et quibus filiis hominum? quibus non est salus. et cur salus non est? ostendit: exibit spiritus eorum et reuertentur in terram suam. et reuersuris in terram quid erit? in illa die peribunt omnes cogitationes eorum: corruptae ipsi scilicet originis, quia esse filii hominum perstiterunt nec filii dei esse uoluerunt; nullius quoque salutis, quia exeunte spiritu et in terram corporibus dissolutis cogitationes eorum corporeae atque terrenae cum terreno corpore interibunt.
After which he refutes the foolish opinions of men and the empty religions in the names of kings, whom antiquity invented as gods for itself, saying: "Do not trust in princes, and in the sons of men, in whom there is no salvation. Their spirit will go forth, and they will return to their earth; in that day all their thoughts will perish." He forbade trusting in kings. And in which kings? He added: "and in the sons," he says, "of men." And which sons of men? "In whom there is no salvation." And why is there no salvation? He showed: "Their spirit will go forth, and they will return to their earth." And what will there be for those about to return to the earth? "In that day all their thoughts will perish": themselves of a corrupt origin, namely, because they persisted in being sons of men and did not want to be sons of God; and of no salvation, because, the spirit going forth and the bodies dissolved into earth, their bodily and earthly thoughts will perish with the earthly body.
145.4CSEL 22:841–842
Sed uetita in eius modi reges fiducia, in quem sperandum esset, ostendit dicens: beatus, cuius deus Iacob adiutor est: spes eius in domino deo ipsius, qui fecit cselum et terram, mare et omnia, quae in eis sunt; qui custodit ueritatem in sseculum, facit iudicium his, qui patiuntur iniuriam. non est caduca cogitatio in regem eius modi sperare; et spes illa non interit, quse in creatorem caeli, terrae, maris et omnis uniuersitatis huius extenditur. hic sperandus adiutor est, in quo dolus non est. nam cum secundum prophetiam omnis homo mendax est, ueritatem in saeculo solus ille custodit et custodiens ueritatem iudicium facit ob eos, qui patiuntur iniuriam. beatus ille est, quem adiuuando ex Iacob faciet Israhel. spes eius aeterna est, quia in creatorem caeli, terrae marisque confidit. creator autem horum omnium hic et uerus et iudex est et ueritatem custodiendo et faciendo iudicium.
But having forbidden trust in kings of this kind, he showed in whom one should hope, saying: "Blessed is he whose helper is the God of Jacob; his hope is in the Lord his God, who made heaven and earth, the sea and all that is in them; who keeps truth for ever, who executes judgment for those who suffer wrong." It is no perishable thought to hope in a king of this kind; and that hope does not perish which reaches toward the creator of heaven, earth, sea, and all this universe. This helper is to be hoped in, in whom there is no deceit. For since, according to the prophecy, every man is a liar, he alone keeps truth in the world, and keeping truth he executes judgment for those who suffer wrong. Blessed is he whom by helping he will make Israel out of Jacob. His hope is eternal, because he trusts in the creator of heaven, earth, and sea. And the creator of all these is both true and judge, both by keeping truth and by executing judgment.
145.5CSEL 22:842–843
Neque solum iudicium facit, sed etiam id, quod sequitur: dat escam esurientibus. dominus soluit conpeditos: dominus sapientificat csecos, dominus erigit elisos, dominus diligit iustos. dominus custodit proselytum, pupillum et uiduam suscipiet et uiam peccatorum exterminabit hsec quidem et corporaliter intellegere non otiosum est: sed altius nescio quid et maius sermo conplectitur. dat, inquit, escam esurientibus. uideamus quam escam et quibus esurientibus. et hse quidem escae corporales non tum semper praebentur a deo, cum esuritur a nobis. annuum namque hoc earum munus est: et ideo intra tempus praebentur, ut intra tempus ne quis esuriat. est igitur alia esuritio et sunt aliter esurientes, quibus esurientibus esca praebetur. scriptum namque est in Amos propheta: ecce induco famem super terram; non famem panis neque sitim aquse, sed famem, ut audiatur uerbum dei. hanc igitur escam praedicationis esurientibus dominus inpertit. quae cum in cibum fuerit adsumpta, uincula diaboli resoluuntur. ligauit enim secundum euangelia decem et octo annis Abrahse filiam. compedes quoque auaritise, libidinis, ebrietatis cibus talis absoluit. et absolutis compedibus caecis sapientiam praestat. si de corporalibus donis propheta loqueretur, commemorasset potius caecis lumen indultum. sed quia per cibum esuritione depulsa soluebantur compedes saeculi, etiam caecitas saeculi sapientiae inpertitione depellitur. alimur enim post ingentem famem diuinse cognitionis spiritalibus cibis et compedibus, quibus currere ad aeterna non sinimur, absolutis, discussa per indultam sapientiam csecitate creatorem nostrum oculis intellegentise contuemur. desinit ergo famis longa, compedes graues, caecitas stulta et id, quod sequitur, succedit.
And not only does he execute judgment, but also what follows: "He gives food to the hungry. The Lord looses the fettered; the Lord makes the blind wise; the Lord raises up the dashed down; the Lord loves the righteous. The Lord guards the proselyte; he will receive the orphan and the widow, and he will destroy the way of sinners." It is not idle to understand these things bodily too; but the speech embraces something higher and greater. "He gives," it says, "food to the hungry." Let us see what food and to which hungry. These bodily foods are not always given by God at the moment we hunger. For their gift is yearly: and so they are given within a set time, so that within that time no one may hunger. There is, then, another hunger, and there are those who hunger otherwise, to whom, as they hunger, food is given. For it is written in the prophet Amos: "Behold, I bring a famine on the earth; not a famine of bread nor a thirst for water, but a famine of hearing the word of God." This food of preaching, then, the Lord imparts to the hungry. And when it has been taken as food, the chains of the devil are loosed. For according to the Gospels he bound a daughter of Abraham for eighteen years. Such food also looses the fetters of avarice, lust, and drunkenness. And when the fetters are loosed, he gives wisdom to the blind. If the prophet were speaking of bodily gifts, he would rather have mentioned sight granted to the blind. But since, hunger driven away by food, the fetters of the world were being loosed, the blindness of the world too is driven away by the imparting of wisdom. For after a great famine of divine knowledge we are nourished by spiritual foods, and, the fetters by which we are not allowed to run to eternal things being loosed, the blindness dispelled through granted wisdom, we behold our creator with the eyes of understanding. The long famine ceases, then, the heavy fetters, the foolish blindness, and what follows takes their place.
145.6CSEL 22:843
Adlisi eriguntur, iusti diliguntur, aduense siue proselyti custodiuntur, pupillus et uidua suscipitur et uia peccatorum disperditur. quisquis ille est, qui modo dei est, etsi non uniforme, tamen proprium habet munus. ut, adlisus licet, si non esuriat, si non compeditus et stultus sit, tamen erigi possit, ne iaceat in aeternum; ut iustus ob iustitiam diligatur, ut aduena, etsi non tamquam iustus diligitur, tamen uel ob hoc, quia aduenerit, reseruetur, ut pupillus, quia patrem sibi diabolum abiurauerat, exemplo apostolorum non orphanus relinquatur, ut uidua suscipiatur in sponsam, posteaquam sibi in Christo confixus hic mundus est. omnem enim credentium fidem, cui per adimpletionem temporum lex tamquam uir primus emortuus sit, uiduam apostolus nuncupauit. sed non solum uidua suscipitur, sed etiam uia peccatorum exterminatur. quibus in interitum demersis Hierusalem sancti illius regis ciuitas incoletur: non ista utique, quae desolata et subuersa profani parricidii luit poenas.
The dashed down are raised up, the righteous loved, strangers or proselytes guarded, the orphan and the widow received, and the way of sinners destroyed. Whoever belongs to God in any way has, if not a uniform, yet a proper gift: so that one dashed down, if he does not hunger, if he is not fettered and foolish, may yet be raised so as not to lie for ever; so that the righteous may be loved for his righteousness; so that the stranger, though not loved as righteous, may yet be preserved at least because he has come; so that the orphan, because he had renounced the devil as his father, may not be left an orphan, after the example of the apostles; so that the widow may be received as a bride, after this world has been crucified to her in Christ. For the apostle called the whole faith of believers, for whom, through the fulfilment of times, the law, like a first husband, has died, a widow. But not only is the widow received, but also the way of sinners is destroyed. When they have been plunged into destruction, the Jerusalem, the city of that holy king, will be inhabited: certainly not this one, which, desolate and overthrown, has paid the penalties of profane murder.
145.7CSEL 22:843–844
Conclusit enim ita: regnabit dominus in seternum: deus tuus, Sion, in generationem et generationem. ubi illa Sion est, in qua regnaturus est dominus? nisi forte in ea, quae prophetas occidit et lapidat eos, qui ad se missi sunt? haec utique hodie iam non est et quomodo dominus in aeternum regnabit regni sui sede subuersa? sed regnabit in ea, quae mater caelestis est, quae uiuis lapidibus exstructa et sanctis ciuibus plena per generationem legis et per generationem fidei frequentabitur a domesticis dei et domini nostri Iesu Christi, qui est benedictus in saecula saeculorum. amen.
For he concluded thus: "The Lord will reign for ever: your God, O Zion, to generation and generation." Where is that Zion in which the Lord is to reign? Unless perhaps in the one that kills the prophets and stones those sent to it? That one certainly no longer exists today; and how will the Lord reign for ever, the seat of his kingdom overthrown? But he will reign in her who is the heavenly mother, who, built of living stones and full of holy citizens, will be thronged through the generation of the law and the generation of faith by the household of God and of our Lord Jesus Christ, who is blessed for ever and ever. Amen.
Tractates 146
146.1CSEL 22:844–845
Post primam Hierusalem subuersionem traductoque in Babyloniam populo captiuo sedificatam rursum eandem ciuitatem fuisse et historia Regnorum et libri Esdrse locuntur. sed hodie eandem nullam esse rerum fides edocet. et hoc idcirco praediximus, ne, quia translatoribus uisum est huic et anteriori psalmo in Aggseum et Zachariam titulum praescribere, existimemus in illius temporis homines prophetise huius prsescientiam conuenire. propheta enim non ignarus mysterii caelestis, cum in sedificatione dei ciuitatis humanam sedificationem inanem esse dixisset, cum deo ciuitas nisi per ipsum sedificata aeterna esse non posset, non nos nunc ad gratulationem sedificatse a deo rursum Hierusalem hortaretur, quam in uanum ab hominibus aedificari ante praedixerat. quod si quis forte putabit id, quod in alio psalmo ita dictum est: nisi dominus sedificauerit domum, in uanum laborant, qui aedificant eam; nisi dominus custodierit ciuitatem, in uanum uigilabit, qui custodit eam, idcirco dictum fuisse, quia euersionem eius urbis, in qua templum exsedificandum esset, propheta praenosceret, meminisse haec ita intellegens debet eundem hunc prophetam sedificationem eam, quse a Zorobabel secundo innouata est, et inanem et caducam futuram fuisse non ignorare potuisse, neque illam, quae a Salomone coepta est, non a deo institutam idcirco dixisse, quia per regem Babylonise esset destruenda, cum post septuaginta deinde annos rursum eadem sit reformata; hanc uero, quse a Zorobabel gesta est, esse sedificationem dei praedicatam, cum exinde diruta et sine aliqua restauratione sit dissoluta; et eam, dirutam licet renouatio sit consecuta, inanem atque humanam tamen prsedicasse, hanc uero, quae sine spe reformationis acciderit, diuini operis perpetuitate renouari! haec omnia intellegentise genera stulta atque ridicula sunt.
That after the first overthrow of Jerusalem and the carrying of the captive people into Babylonia this same city was built again, both the history of the Kingdoms and the books of Ezra say. But the evidence of facts teaches that today it does not exist. And we have said this beforehand so that, because the translators saw fit to prefix a title naming Haggai and Zechariah to this and the preceding psalm, we may not think that the foreknowledge of this prophecy fits the men of that time. For the prophet, not ignorant of the heavenly mystery, since he had said that in the building of God's city human building is vain, since a city could not be eternal for God unless built by him, would not now urge us to rejoice over a Jerusalem rebuilt by God, which he had earlier foretold was built by men in vain. But if anyone perhaps thinks that what was said in another psalm thus, "Unless the Lord builds the house, those who build it labor in vain; unless the Lord guards the city, he who guards it keeps watch in vain," was said because the prophet foreknew the overthrow of the city in which the temple was to be built, he who understands it so ought to remember that this same prophet could not have been ignorant that the building renewed a second time by Zerubbabel would also be vain and perishable; nor would he have said that the one begun by Solomon was not established by God because it was to be destroyed by the king of Babylon, since after seventy years it was restored again; and that this one carried out by Zerubbabel was proclaimed a building of God, though thereafter it was torn down and dissolved without any restoration; and that he proclaimed that one, though renewal followed its destruction, vain and human, but this one, which fell without hope of restoration, renewed by the perpetuity of divine work! All these kinds of understanding are foolish and ridiculous.
146.2CSEL 22:845–846
Laudat autem propheta dominum aedificantem Hierusalem illam, quae secundum euangelia sancti regis est ciuitas, in qua per dominum resurgentes sancti demonstrantur, quae inuectum pullo asinse dominum sanctorum lseta suscepit. corporaliter tum quidem tali uectione illam, quae occidit prophetas et lapidat apostolos, dominus ingressus est: sed alterius ciuitatis erat illa laetitia. ob illius ergo sedificationem propheta nos aduocat dicens: laudate dominum, quoniam bonus est psalmus: domino nostro sit iucunda laudatio. non leuis gratulationis laus est, cum bonus psalmus est. et psalmus non tam uocis, ut frequenter diximus, quam corporeae operationis officium significari solet. dominum enim non tam sermone quam re et gestis oboedientise laudamus: ut mare et terra et caelum deum non tam uoce quam officiorum suorum uicissitudine atque obseruatione laudant. aduocat igitur nos propheta ad dei laudem, quia bonus psalmus est, et optat, ut huius boni psalmi deo nostro fiat iucunda laudatio, scilicet ut placentia deo opera nostra sint, per quse a nobis gestorum nostrorum laudatur obsequio.
The prophet praises the Lord building that Jerusalem which, according to the Gospels, is the city of the holy king, in which the saints rising through the Lord are shown, which joyfully received the Lord of the saints riding on the colt of an ass. Bodily, indeed, the Lord then entered with such a mount that city which kills the prophets and stones the apostles; but that joy belonged to another city. For the building of that city, then, the prophet calls us, saying: "Praise the Lord, for a psalm is good; let praise be pleasing to our God." It is the praise of no light rejoicing when a psalm is good. And a psalm, as we have often said, is usually signified as the duty not so much of the voice as of bodily working. For we praise the Lord not so much by speech as by deed and acts of obedience: as the sea and the earth and heaven praise God not so much by voice as by the alternation and observance of their duties. The prophet calls us, then, to the praise of God, because a psalm is good, and wishes that the praise of this good psalm may be pleasing to our God, namely, that our works may be pleasing to God, by which he is praised by us through the obedience of our deeds.
146.3CSEL 22:846
Aedificans Hierusalem dominus et dispersiones Israhel congregans. qui sanat contritos corde et alligat contritiones eorum. numerans multitudinem stellarum et omnibus his nomina uocans. reuersuris de Babylonia in Hierusalem Iudaeis sub Dario rege edicto potestas data est reuertendi. neque alibi tum quam in regni Babyloniae finibus detinebantur: ex qua ergo dispersione Israhel congregatur? nempe ea, de qua ait dominus: emittet angelos suos cum tuba et uoce magna et congregabit electos a quattuor angulis uentorum: quorum congregatio coetum sanctae ciuitatis efficiet, quae hodie per spei et fidei opus sedificatur in nobis. et idcirco anterior sedificatio congregatione est, quia nos ad futurae ciuitatis congregationem dei misericordia per gratiam iustificationis sedificet ceterum si de terrena sedificatione loqueretur, prior fuerat congregatio praedicanda, quia non nisi congregatus Israhel Hierusalem sedificare posset euersam.
"The Lord builds Jerusalem and gathers the dispersions of Israel; who heals the contrite of heart and binds up their bruises; numbering the multitude of the stars and calling them all by names." Power to return was given by edict under King Darius to the Jews who were to return from Babylonia to Jerusalem. Nor were they then held anywhere other than within the borders of the kingdom of Babylonia: from what dispersion, then, is Israel gathered? Surely from that of which the Lord says: "He will send his angels with a trumpet and a great voice and will gather the elect from the four corners of the winds": whose gathering will make the assembly of the holy city, which today is being built in us through the work of hope and faith. And therefore the building comes before the gathering, because God's mercy builds us, through the grace of justification, for the gathering of the future city; but if he were speaking of an earthly building, the gathering would have had to be proclaimed first, because Israel could not build the overthrown Jerusalem unless it had been gathered.
146.4CSEL 22:846–847
Tenet deinde ordinem conpetentem dicens: qui sanat contritos corde et alligat contritiones eorum. congregato enim Israhel et in unam, quae sedificatur, ciuitatem collecto omnes humanae infirmitates et labes corporeae auferentur. absorpta enim corruptione et omnibus humanae naturae uitiis deuoratis incorruptio aeterna et in nullis anxietatum mortibus conterenda succedet. uenit enim dominus secundum euangelia sanare contritos corde, praedicare captiuis remissionem et caecis uisum, dimittere confractos in requiem, praedicare annum domini acceptum et diem retributionis. et hsec quidem pro parte iam coepta sunt, quia per speculum et in senigmate et in imagine futurorum secundum apostolum demoramur. sed tamen nondum nobis eius temporis fructus est, quo secundum prophetam dicere adepta spei consummatione possimus: conuertere, anima mea, in requiem tuam: quia dominus bene fecit mihi. quia eripuit animam meam de morte, oculos meos a lacrimis, pedes meos a lapsu. placebo domino in regione uiuorum. sanata enim omni cordis contritione et, ne perpetuo rursum subeat, alligata his omnibus humanarum passionum infirmitatibus liberati placebimus deo in regione uiuorum, anima nostra in requiem suam, ex qua per transgressionem primi parentis sui Adse eiecta est, reuertente.
Then he keeps a fitting order, saying: "who heals the contrite of heart and binds up their bruises." For when Israel has been gathered and collected into the one city that is being built, all human weaknesses and bodily stains will be taken away. For corruption having been swallowed up and all the vices of human nature devoured, eternal incorruption will follow, not to be crushed by any deaths of anxieties. For the Lord came, according to the Gospels, to heal the contrite of heart, to preach release to captives and sight to the blind, to send the broken into rest, to preach the acceptable year of the Lord and the day of recompense. And these things have indeed already begun in part, because, according to the apostle, we dwell through a mirror and in a riddle and in the image of things to come. But yet the fruit of that time is not yet ours, in which, according to the prophet, having attained the completion of hope, we can say: "Return, my soul, to your rest, for the Lord has done well to me, for he has rescued my soul from death, my eyes from tears, my feet from falling. I will please the Lord in the land of the living." For when all contrition of heart has been healed and bound up, lest it come upon us again perpetually, freed from all these weaknesses of human sufferings we shall please God in the land of the living, our soul returning to its rest, from which it was cast out through the transgression of its first parent Adam.
146.5CSEL 22:847–848
Sed post prsedicationem sanati cordis etiam id ad prseconium diuinae bonitatis adiectum est: numerans multitudinem stellarum et omnibus his nomina uocans. si laus deo ob sedificatam corporaliter Hierusalem defertur, quid hic numerus stellarum et nomina tamquam ad praecipuam diuini operis laudationem prseferuntur? aut numquid laudabilius deo est numerasse et nuncupasse stellas quam creasse, cum creatio et numerum fecerit et nomina inposuerit et uocabulis nomina numerumque discreuerit? sed numerantur hic stellae, quas Abraham contuitus in caelo est, quas Isaac accepit in semine, quas Paulus discernit in gloria. quod autem nominibus suis uocentur, audiamus eum, qui uocaturus est. dicit in euangelio: nolite mirari ista; quia uenit hora, in qua omnes, qui sunt in monumentis, audient uocem eius et prodient. uocantur ergo et prodient. adeo autem enumerantur per deum, ut capilli quoque, qui in singulis nobis innumerabiles esse existimantur, in numero sint eodem domino dicente: nonne et capilli capitis uestri numerati sunt? hoc domino potius dignum, hoc in misericordia eius prseferendum, ut eos, quos contritos corde sanauerit, quorum alligauerit contritiones, nominibus uocet, proprietate numeret, cselesti luce clarificet.
But after the proclamation of the healed heart this too was added to the praise of divine goodness: "numbering the multitude of the stars and calling them all by names." If praise is offered to God for a bodily rebuilt Jerusalem, why are the number and names of stars here put forward as if for a special praise of divine work? Or is it more praiseworthy for God to have numbered and named the stars than to have created them, since creation both made the number and imposed the names and distinguished names and number by words? But the stars numbered here are those Abraham beheld in heaven, Isaac received in his seed, Paul distinguishes in glory. And that they are called by their names, let us hear him who will call them. He says in the Gospel: "Do not marvel at this; for the hour is coming in which all who are in the tombs will hear his voice and come forth." They are called, then, and will come forth. And they are so numbered by God that even the hairs, which in each of us are thought innumerable, are in his number, the same Lord saying: "Are not even the hairs of your head numbered?" This is more worthy of the Lord, this to be preferred in his mercy: that those whom he has healed of contrite heart, whose bruises he has bound up, he calls by names, numbers individually, and makes bright with heavenly light.
146.6CSEL 22:848–849
Ob quae mirabilia eius praedicauit: magnus dominus noster et magna uirtus eius et sapientiae eius non est numerus. suscipit enim mansuetos dominus, humiliat autem peccatores usque ad terram. hoc enim mansuetorum proprium est, quia secundum euangelia mansueti possidebunt terram, ut digni apud deum sint nuncupatione, numero, claritate. magnus est dominus, cum disparsiones congregat. magna uirtus eius, cum contrita clarificat. innumerabilis sapientia eius est, cum uniuersa et nominibus discernit et numero. sed qui suscipit mansuetos, humiliat autem peccatores usque ad terram. post meritum sanctitatis impietatis poena subiecta est, cum susceptis mansuetis in claritate stellarum peccatores usque ad terram humiliati infernse legis iudicio destinantur.
For which wonders he proclaimed: "Great is our Lord, and great his power, and of his wisdom there is no number. For the Lord receives the meek, but humbles sinners even to the earth." For this is proper to the meek, since according to the Gospels the meek will possess the earth: that they are worthy before God of naming, number, and brightness. The Lord is great when he gathers the dispersions; his power is great when he makes the contrite bright; his wisdom is innumerable when he distinguishes all things both by names and by number. But he receives the meek and humbles sinners even to the earth. After the merit of holiness the punishment of impiety is added, when, the meek being received into the brightness of the stars, sinners, humbled even to the earth, are destined by the judgment of the infernal law.
146.7CSEL 22:849–850
Ob quse nos, tamquam cunctantes et hsesitantes, propheta cohortatur ad laudem dicens: inchoate domino in confessione, psallite deo nostro in cithara, qui operit caelum nubibus et parat terrse pluuiam, qui producit in montibus fsenum, dat iumentis escam ipsorum et pullis coruorum inuocantibus eum. frequenter admonet propheticus sermo, ut eum uniuersitatis huius esse dominum credamus, quem omnis lex deum locuta est, qui se nuncupari deum Israhel uoluerit: ut nunc in eodem psalmo, cum dixisset: aedificans Hierusalem et congregans dispersiones Israhel, et ad laudem eius cohortatus adiecit: qui operit cselum nubibus, qui parat terrae pluuiam, ut non alius atque alius legis latae et creationis istius deus posset intellegi. ita autem temperata doctrinae istius ratio est, ut ea creationis enumeratse et nomina commemorarentur et genera, quae, cum creatorem deum esse latae legis ostenderent, significationem tamen in se institutionis typicse continerent: ut nunc confiteri deo ob id admonemur, quia operit caelum nubibus, quia parat terrae pluuiam, quia producit in montibus fsenum, dat iumentis escam ipsorum [et herbam seruituti hominum] et pullis coruorum inuocantibus eum. in his enim omnibus dei et prouidentia significatur et bonitas, ut subtexto nubibus caelo terris pluuias infundat, ut uertices collium fseno uestiat et iumentis pabulum praebeat et auibus cibos praestet, quia ab eo alimoniam uniuersa, quae creauit, expectent. sed haec omnia diligentius introspecta significationis alterius uirtutem in se habent.
For which reasons the prophet urges us, as if hesitant and wavering, to praise, saying: "Begin to the Lord in confession; sing psalms to our God on the harp, who covers heaven with clouds and prepares rain for the earth, who brings forth grass on the mountains, gives to the beasts their food and to the young ravens that call upon him." The prophetic word often admonishes us to believe that he is Lord of this universe whom the whole law has called God, who willed to be named the God of Israel: as now in this same psalm, when he had said, "building Jerusalem and gathering the dispersions of Israel," and urging us to his praise added, "who covers heaven with clouds, who prepares rain for the earth," so that one God of the law given and another of this creation could not be understood. The reasoning of this teaching has been so tempered that both the names and kinds of the creation enumerated are recalled, which, while they show that the giver of the law is God the creator, yet contain in themselves the meaning of a typical instruction: as now we are admonished to confess to God because he covers heaven with clouds, because he prepares rain for the earth, because he brings forth grass on the mountains, gives to the beasts their food and to the young ravens that call upon him. For in all these are signified both God's providence and his goodness, that, heaven being veiled with clouds, he pours rains on the lands, clothes the tops of hills with grass, provides fodder for the beasts and food for the birds, because all that he has created expect nourishment from him. But all these, looked at more carefully, have in themselves the force of another meaning.
146.8CSEL 22:850
Scimus enim esse nubes, quibus deus, ne super uineam pluant, mandat, sicut per Esaiam dictum est: et nubibus mandabo, ne pluant super eam pluuiam; uinea enim domini Sabaoth domus Israhel est. nouimus nubes, quae prae fulgore eius in conspectu domini transeunt: prae fulgore, inquit, eius in conspectu eius nubes transierunt. nouimus nubes, quas deus in ascensum suum posuit: et posuit nubem ascensum suum. nouimus nubes, ad quas usque dei ueritas est: et usque ad nubes ueritas tua. et has nubes aliquot locis sanctorum doctrinam significari ratio absoluta est, quae uetitae infidelibus pluere eloquia arida impiorum corda non irrigant. quse, cum dominus adsit, esse cessabunt: ut orto sole stellarum lumen hebetatur. ita et doctrinae nubium domino ipso iam per se fulgente praetereunt. per quas etiam ad dominum conscenditur, dum diuina praedicatio iter nobis regni caelestis ostendit: et ideo hse nubes nobis positse sunt in ascensum. ueritas quoque dei usque ad nubes easdem est, quia in se ueram dei cognitionem haec doctrina prophetica continet.
For we know there are clouds which God commands not to rain upon the vineyard, as was said through Isaiah: "And I will command the clouds not to rain rain upon it; for the vineyard of the Lord of hosts is the house of Israel." We know clouds that pass before the Lord at his brightness: "At his brightness," it says, "the clouds passed before him." We know clouds which God set as his ascent: "And he set the cloud as his ascent." We know clouds to which God's truth reaches: "And your truth reaches to the clouds." And that in several places these clouds signify the teaching of the saints is plain reasoning: forbidden to rain on unbelievers, their sayings do not water the dry hearts of the impious. When the Lord is present, they will cease to be: as when the sun rises the light of the stars is dimmed, so too the teachings of the clouds pass away when the Lord himself now shines by himself. Through them too one climbs to the Lord, while divine preaching shows us the way of the heavenly kingdom: and therefore these clouds have been set for us as an ascent. God's truth too reaches to these same clouds, because this prophetic teaching contains in itself true knowledge of God.
146.9CSEL 22:850–851
Haec ergo ad commemorationem dei laudium creaturarum genera electa sunt, quae, cum prseconium in se creatoris ostenderent, parabolicam tamen, siue, ut apostolus ait, allegorumenam nobis doctrinam ita commemorata praeberent. caelum ergo nubibus subtegitur, id est prophetica doctrina rebus est subiecta diuinis. pluuia terris infunditur, eloquia scilicet harum subtextarum nubium profunduntur, per quae infructuosi ipsi atque aridi ad eliciendos ex nobis fructus dono diuini imbris humescimus. et haec eloquia diuina tamquam imbrem intellegenda esse Moyses testatus est dicens: expectetur sicut pluuia eloquium meum et descendant sicut ros uerba mea, ut pluuia super gramen. haec ergo terrae pluuia praeparatur, post quam fsenum in montibus producitur et iumentis in escam propriam praebetur. opinor fecundiores esse montibus ualles, quse circumiectorum collium concauo decliui in se humore pinguescant; et quid rationis est, ut ad escam iumentorum produci faena laudentur in montibus? et quamquam plures montes fecundis uerticibus atque herbidis sunt, tamen rerum corporalium nominibus spiritalis doctrina conserta est. producunt ergo montes iumentis in escam suam fsenum; sed montes, qui exultauerunt sicut arietes, in quos frequenter propheta oculos erexit dicens: leuaui oculos meos in montes. hi ergo montes, patriarcharum prophetarum apostolorum martyrum altitudines, fsena pecoribus producunt. et quibus tandem pecoribus? Esaiam audiamus: agnouit, inquit, bos possessorem suum et asinus praesaepium domini sui; Israhel uero me non cognouit. et quia per hebetis naturae inreligiosam ignorationem pecora sunt dicta, cibus quoque eorum significatus in fseno. hoc ergo faenum et his iumentis praebetur in montibus.
These kinds of creatures, then, were chosen for recalling the praises of God, which, while showing in themselves the proclamation of the Creator, yet, so recalled, offer us a teaching in parable, or, as the apostle says, spoken allegorically. Heaven, then, is veiled with clouds, that is, prophetic teaching has been placed beneath divine things. Rain is poured on the lands, namely, the sayings of these veiling clouds are poured out, by which we, fruitless and dry ourselves, are moistened by the gift of divine rain to bring forth fruits from us. And that these divine sayings are to be understood as rain Moses testified, saying: "Let my saying be awaited like rain, and let my words come down like dew, like rain upon the grass." This rain, then, is prepared for the earth, after which grass is brought forth on the mountains and given to the beasts as their proper food. I think valleys are more fertile than mountains, which grow rich with moisture in themselves from the hollow slope of the surrounding hills; and what reason is there for praising the bringing forth of grass on mountains for the food of beasts? And although many mountains have fertile and grassy summits, yet spiritual teaching has been woven with the names of bodily things. The mountains, then, bring forth grass for the beasts as their food; but the mountains that skipped like rams, to which the prophet often raised his eyes, saying: "I have lifted up my eyes to the mountains." These mountains, then, the heights of patriarchs, prophets, apostles, martyrs, bring forth grass for the cattle. And for which cattle, pray? Let us hear Isaiah: "The ox knew its owner," he says, "and the ass its master's manger; but Israel has not known me." And since they were called cattle through the irreligious ignorance of a dull nature, their food too is signified in the grass. This grass, then, is given also to these beasts on the mountains.
146.10CSEL 22:851–852
In pluribus autem codicibus insertum hunc uersum deprehendimus: et herbam seruituti hominum, ut ea, quae superius dicta sunt, de homine dicta esse per nuncupationem ipsius hominis intellegerentur. sed nos non egemus hoc sensu. nam licet non inpediat adiectus, non tamen eum, tamquam non aliis ad huius intellegentise confirmationem uti possimus, amplectimur. hic enim ordo dictorum est: qui operit caelum nubibus et parat terrae pluuiam, qui producit in montibus fsenum, dat iumentis escam ipsorum et herbam seruituti hominum et pullis coruorum inuocantibus eum. siue igitur per nubium pluuiam producto iumentis in montibus fseno, ut allegorica doctrina posset intellegi, hsec herba seruituti hominum praebetur, qui pecudea ignoratione deposita deum tandem rationabiliter conperissent; siue, quod absolutius intellegi potest, in herba fructus humanis cibis praestiti edocentur, quia omnes fructus per herbam confirmantur in messem: deo utrumque laudi est, infirmitati eum nostrae uel corporales in fructus cibos uel spiritalia in prophetis uitae pabula praebuisse.
In many manuscripts we have found this verse inserted: "and grass for the service of men," so that what was said above might be understood to be said of man through the naming of man himself. But we do not need this sense. For although, added, it does not hinder, yet we do not embrace it, as though we could not use other things to confirm this understanding. For this is the order of the words: "who covers heaven with clouds and prepares rain for the earth, who brings forth grass on the mountains, gives to the beasts their food, and grass for the service of men, and to the young ravens that call upon him." Whether, then, the grass having been brought forth for the beasts on the mountains through the rain of the clouds, so that an allegorical teaching might be understood, this grass is given for the service of men, who, having laid aside cattle-like ignorance, had at last come to know God rationally; or, what can be understood more plainly, the fruits given for human food are taught in the grass, because all fruits are made firm through the grass for harvest: both are to God's praise, that he provided for our weakness either bodily foods in fruits or spiritual pastures of life in the prophets.
146.11CSEL 22:852
Sed id, quod sequitur, quomodo intellegi oportebit: et pullis coruorum inuocantibus eum? deum inuocare proprium hominis officium est, qui solus ex uniuersis animantibus particeps rationis effectus est. coruorum uero pulli deum quomodo inuocant? et cur pulli coruorum potius quam corui, quorum natura hebes, inproba, inprouida, nulla dei cognitione donata sit? aut quse esca praebetur? numquid ut fseni iumentis et ut herba hominibus? corruptorum cadauerum foetidas sordes deus orantibus se coruorum pullis et pecudum mortes ad cibum uitae praesentis inpertiet? hsec ita intellegere non dicam erroris, sed inreligiositatis extremae est. quid ergo intellegi oporteat, prout ipsi dono gratise caelestis adepti sumus, loquemur.
But how will what follows have to be understood: "and to the young ravens that call upon him"? To call upon God is the proper duty of man, who alone of all living things was made a sharer of reason. But how do the young of ravens call upon God? And why the young of ravens rather than ravens, whose nature is dull, wicked, improvident, endowed with no knowledge of God? Or what food is given? Like grass to beasts and like herbage to men? Will God grant the stinking filth of corrupted corpses and the deaths of cattle as food for the present life to the young ravens praying to him? To understand these things so is, I will not say error, but the extreme of irreligion. What, then, ought to be understood we shall say, as we ourselves have received it by the gift of heavenly grace.
146.12CSEL 22:852–853
Coruum in formam peccatoris constitutum esse tum, cum ex arca emissus non redit, meminimus. cum enim consistendi nusquam locus esset aquis in uniuersa diffusis, ipse columba postea non reperta requie reuertente non rediit. cum enim illic arca ecclesiae formam habuerit, is, qui ecclesiam, cum numquam alibi posset consistere, derelinquit, peccatoris in eo exemplum est constitutum, qui, cum nullam aliam praeterquam ecclesiae requiem habeat in saeculo, mauult tamen in inanibus saeculi demorari. hanc quoque auem legimus in pastum Helise deputatam cibos semper ei fuisse solitam inferre et hoc tum, cum impiissime omnis populus et inreligiosissime deuersaretur. in famulatum ergo tanti prophetae haec auis, quae in formam peccatoris erat constituta, delecta est. cum enim anterior populus inprobabilis repertus est, tum dei prsedicatio, quse cibus et esuritio est prophetarum, per eorum, qui peccatores erant, officia expletur. nos enim uel ceteri ante nos ex inpudentibus et procacibus et inmundis et cruentis geniti atque nati tamquam pulli coruorum deum inuocamus agnitione, confessione, famulatu: ut ex iumentis et pecoribus per agnitionem dei homines effecti, rationis scilicet participes ex rationis ignaris, quibus cotidie a deo producente in prophetis doctrinae praedicationem tamquam in montibus faenum cibi caelestis praebetur alimonia.
We remember that the raven was set as a figure of the sinner when, sent out from the ark, it did not return. For although there was nowhere to settle, the waters being spread over everything, it did not return, while the dove afterward, finding no rest, came back. For since the ark there had the form of the church, in him who leaves the church, though he could never settle elsewhere, the example of the sinner was set, who, though he has no rest in the world except the church, yet prefers to linger in the empty things of the world. We read too that this bird, assigned to feed Elijah, always used to bring him food, and this at a time when the whole people was living most impiously and irreligiously. This bird, then, which had been set as a figure of the sinner, was chosen for the service of so great a prophet. For when the former people was found reprobate, then the preaching of God, which is the food and hunger of the prophets, is fulfilled through the services of those who were sinners. For we, or others before us, begotten and born of the shameless and wanton and unclean and bloody, call upon God like young ravens by acknowledgment, confession, and service: so that from beasts and cattle we have become men through acknowledgment of God, sharers of reason from those ignorant of reason, to whom daily, God bringing it forth in the prophets, the preaching of teaching is given as the nourishment of heavenly food, like grass on the mountains.
146.13CSEL 22:853–854
Ut autem omnia hsec, quse allegorice commemorata sunt, in profectum humanae salutis geri intellegerentur, psalmum conclusione confirmat. ita enim ait: non in uiribus equi uoluntatem habet, nec in tabernaculis uiri beneplacitum est ei. beneplacitum est domino super timentes eum et in omnes, qui sperant super misericordiam eius. contraria sibi ista sunt, si corporaliter intellegantur. quomodo enim deus iumentis fsenum producit in montibus, cui non est beneplacitum in equis? necessitatis namque ministerium, non prouidentise benignitas est alimonia praebere non placitis. sed quia omnis dei misericordia curam habet humanse salutis, allegorice superius dicta conclusionis absolutione consummat: non pecorum speciem atque uirtutem nec pretiosarum domorum deo ornamenta placuisse — quae maxima est humanae opinionis ambitio, habere equos nobiles, domos pulchras — sed placere tantum timentem, sperantem et potestatem dei et misericordiam spe metuque testantem. misericors enim et potens est, qui dixit: qui credit in me, non iudicabitur, sed transiet de morte ad uitam; et potens mortem demutare uita et misericors iudicii amouere terrorem dominus noster Iesus Christus, qui est benedictus in saecula saeculorum. amen.
And so that all these things, recalled allegorically, might be understood to be done for the advancement of human salvation, he confirms the psalm with its conclusion. For he says thus: "He does not have his will in the strength of the horse, nor is his good pleasure in the tents of a man. The Lord's good pleasure is upon those who fear him and upon all who hope in his mercy." These are contrary to each other if understood bodily. For how does God bring forth grass on the mountains for beasts if he takes no pleasure in horses? For to provide nourishment to those not pleasing is a service of necessity, not the kindness of providence. But since all God's mercy has care for human salvation, he completes what was said allegorically above with the plainness of the conclusion: that neither the beauty and strength of beasts nor the ornaments of precious houses have pleased God (this is the greatest ambition of human opinion, to have noble horses and beautiful houses), but that only he pleases who fears and hopes and bears witness by hope and fear to both the power and the mercy of God. For he is merciful and powerful who said: "He who believes in me will not be judged, but will pass from death to life"; both powerful to change death into life and merciful to remove the terror of judgment, our Lord Jesus Christ, who is blessed for ever and ever. Amen.
Tractates 147
147.1CSEL 22:854
Et huic psalmo, ut ei, qui ante superiorem fuit, Aggaei et Zachariae, cum in hebraicis non extet, nomen adscribitur: ut et per hunc et per eos, sicut superius ostendi, aeternae Hierusalem prophetia posset intellegi.
To this psalm too, as to the one before the preceding, the name of Haggai and Zechariah is ascribed, although it does not stand in the Hebrew: so that through this one and through those, as I showed above, the prophecy of the eternal Jerusalem might be understood.
147.2CSEL 22:854–855
Lauda, Hierusalem, dominum, lauda deum tuum, Sion. non differt Hierusalem a Sion; nam secundum locorum nomina urbis ipsius locus idem est: sed nominum interpretatio geminam hanc eiusdem urbis commemorationem necessario desiderabat. Hierusalem enim est ciuitas pacis. et quia domini nostri regnum in pace et unanimitate sanctorum est — et factus est, inquit, in pace locus eius—, conuentus ille beatorum, qui dei regnum est, Hierusalem tamquam ciuitas pacis est dictus. ciuitatem uero hanc uiuis, ut apostolus ait, lapidibus extructam sanctorum coetus conformis gloriae dei ex resurrectione consummat, qui se, qualis futurus esset, per fidem in corpore domini ante speculatus est et idcirco etiam Sion nuncupatur. corpus quidem domini secundum interpretationis uirtutem, quia in eo spem nostram fide contemplamur, in omnibus scripturis Sion nuncupari existimatur, quia Sion speculatio est. sed ciuitas illa, quse Hierusalem est, quse propter unanimitatem ciuitas pacis est, etiam propter conformationem in se corporis dei, in quo se ante speculata est, Sion nuncupatur: cuius gloriam adepta est, accepit quoque eius et nomen. ergo et conuentus ille pacificus et gloria illa corporum demutatorum in Hierusalem et Sion nomine est, quod utrumque unum est; non saxa inania neque sedificationes hebetes, sed rationale animal, fundamentorum uiuarumque lapides gemmarum et ciues sanctitatis et dei in domesticos suos dominatus haec ciuitas est, quse ex sensu beatitudinis suae et confessionis prseconio aduocatur ad laudem.
"Praise the Lord, O Jerusalem; praise your God, O Zion." Jerusalem does not differ from Zion; for according to the names of places it is the same site of the same city: but the meaning of the names necessarily called for this twofold mention of the same city. For Jerusalem is the city of peace. And since the kingdom of our Lord is in the peace and unanimity of the saints ("and his place," it says, "has been made in peace"), that assembly of the blessed, which is the kingdom of God, has been called Jerusalem as the city of peace. This city, built, as the apostle says, of living stones, the company of the saints conformed to God's glory from the resurrection completes, which beheld beforehand by faith in the Lord's body what it would be, and therefore is also called Zion. The Lord's body, indeed, according to the force of the meaning, because in it we contemplate our hope by faith, is thought to be called Zion in all the Scriptures, because Zion is watchtower. But that city which is Jerusalem, which because of unanimity is the city of peace, is also called Zion because of the conforming in it of the body of God, in which it beheld itself beforehand: whose glory it has attained, it has also received its name. Both that peaceful assembly, then, and that glory of changed bodies are in the name of Jerusalem and Zion, both of which are one: this city is not empty stones nor dull buildings, but a rational living being, the living stones of foundations and gems, citizens of holiness, and God's dominion over his household; and it is called to praise from the sense of its blessedness and the proclamation of confession.
147.3CSEL 22:855–856
Et propheta causam laudationis adiecit: quoniam confortauit seras portarum tuarum, benedixit filios tuos in te. qui posuit fines tuos pacem et adipe frumenti satians te. haec illa est beatae terrae hereditas, quam dominus in euangeliis mansuetis spopondit dicens: beati mansueti, quoniam ipsi hereditabunt terram. plurimis in locis prophetae beatitudinis huius tempus praedicauerunt et firmitatem ciuitatis huius aeternae: cuius ita portae et serae confirmatae sunt, ut aduersariis nobis inimicisque uirtutibus inpenetrabilis, inuia, indissolubilis perseueret, nullius egens, quia ad corporis animaeque substantiam seternitate firma, benedicta in incolis, uoluntate pacifica, uitae substantia copiosa.
And the prophet added the cause of praise: "For he has strengthened the bars of your gates; he has blessed your sons within you; who has set peace as your borders and satisfies you with the fat of wheat." This is that inheritance of the blessed land which the Lord promised the meek in the Gospels, saying: "Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth." In very many places the prophets proclaimed the time of this blessedness and the firmness of this eternal city: whose gates and bars have been so strengthened that it remains impenetrable, impassable, indissoluble to our adversaries and the hostile powers, lacking nothing, because firm in eternity as to the substance of body and soul, blessed in its inhabitants, peaceful in will, abundant in the substance of life.
147.4CSEL 22:856
Sed ad hanc dei praedicationem etiam illud adiungitur: qui emittit eloquium suum terrae; uelociter currit sermo eius. prsedicationis regni dei non fuit lenta properatio, sed in omnem terram indefessa mobilitate et celeri transcucurrit. ubi enim non statim, cum dominus regni sui gloriam in corpore natus ostendit, apostolicae et propheticae doctrinae cursus egressus est? per hancque uelocem transcursionem sedificatio beatae huius ciuitatis est coepta, quse auditis opulentise suae copiis cotidie ubique uiuis fidelium lapidibus structa usque ad incolatus sui plenitudinem conparatur, cuius in congregandis omnibus ex quattuor partibus mundi uelox sermo percurrit, rursum ad confrequentandam hanc beati regni ciuitatem in coetum consummatae plenitudinis congregandis.
But to this proclamation of God this too is added: "who sends out his word to the earth; his speech runs swiftly." The haste of the preaching of God's kingdom was not slow, but it ran across into all the earth with untiring and swift mobility. For where did not the course of apostolic and prophetic teaching go forth at once, when the Lord, born in a body, showed the glory of his kingdom? And through this swift crossing the building of this blessed city began, which, having heard of the abundance of its wealth, is daily built everywhere of the living stones of the faithful until it reaches the fullness of its inhabitants; whose swift word runs across to gather all from the four parts of the world, to be gathered again into the company of completed fullness to fill this city of the blessed kingdom.
147.5CSEL 22:856–857
Sed et praedicatio alia conectitur: qui dat niuem sicut lanam, nebulam sicut cinerem spargit. mittit crystallum suum sicut frusta panis, ante faciem frigoris eius quis subsistit? emittit uerbum suum, et liquefaciet ea; flauit spiritus eius, et fluent aquae. uitse uia, sicut dominus in euangeliis ait, angusta et tribulata est; neque nisi per maximas difficultates et molestias hac ad caelorum regnum uia pergitur. quod quidem de molestiis huius saeculi dictum fuisse intellegi oportet; per praesentes enim uexationes in requiem aeternam aditur. et quamuis rerum praesentium laboribus quasi quadam uiolentia asperrimse hiemis uramur, tamen post harum praesentium acerbitatum rigores deo eos resoluente in placidis et tranquillis et serenis quiescemus. secundum enim dictum propheticum et allegorumeni consuetudinem nunc in niue et nebula et crystallo, quse omnia per naturam suam urunt atque mortificant, ssecularium in nos molestiarum et calamitatum et dolorum et nocturnum ignorantiae frigus significatum esse credendum est. scit hic idem propheta beatae huius ciuitatis participem nequaquam iam frigore isto iniuriae saecularis urendum, dicens: per diem sol non uret te, neque luna per noctem. hsec enim omnia, quibus per praesentes calamitates adurimur, rursum dei bonitate resoluta liquuntur. nix namque lanae mollitudine defluens, tegens omnia intra se detinet; pruina quoque nebulse descendentis cineris modo sparsa constringit; crystallum etiam ultra consuetudinem grandinis duratum et in frusta solidatum habet in se et impetum et rigorem. et si haec perpetuo permanerent, numquid non uniuersa horum frigore perusta semper arerent? quis enim ferre aeternas corporis calamitates indeficientesque posset, si series mali nostri sempiterna traheretur?
But another proclamation too is joined: "who gives snow like wool, scatters mist like ashes. He sends his crystal like morsels of bread; before the face of his cold who will stand? He sends out his word, and it will melt them; his Spirit has blown, and the waters will flow." The way of life, as the Lord says in the Gospels, is narrow and hard pressed; and only through the greatest difficulties and troubles does one proceed by this way to the kingdom of heaven. This must be understood to have been said of the troubles of this world; for through present vexations one comes to eternal rest. And although we are burned by the labors of present things as by a kind of violence of a harsh winter, yet after the rigors of these present bitternesses, God dissolving them, we shall rest in calm, tranquil, and serene things. For according to the prophetic saying and the usage of allegory, we must believe that in the snow and mist and crystal, all of which by their nature burn and kill, the worldly troubles, calamities, and pains against us and the nocturnal cold of ignorance are now signified. This same prophet knows that one who shares in this blessed city will no longer be burned by this cold of worldly injury, saying: "The sun will not burn you by day, nor the moon by night." For all these, by which we are seared through present calamities, are melted again, dissolved by God's goodness. For snow, falling with the softness of wool, covering everything, holds it within itself; frost too, of descending mist, scattered like ashes, binds tight; crystal too, hardened beyond the habit of hail and solidified into morsels, has in itself both violence and rigor. And if these remained perpetually, would not everything, burned by their cold, always be dry? For who could bear eternal and unfailing calamities of the body, if the series of our evil were drawn out everlastingly?
147.6CSEL 22:857–858
Sed dissolutis infirmitatibus corporis regni beati huius tempus aeternum est, ubi non flendum, non dolendum, non corporese cupiditatis demutatione labendum est: sed in his uiuendum, quse, inquit, oculus non uidit, et auris non audiuit, et in cor hominis non ascendit. cessat in bonis futuris intellegentia, auditus, aspectus; nec conspectui subicitur nec auditu capitur nec mente percipitur, quicquid illud beatis aeternis beatum aeternumque promittitur. soluentur igitur haec omnia niuis, pruinse et crystalli frigora tamquam flatu tepenti tum, cum post ssecularis noctis rigores tempora illa regni seterni in unam atque indemutabilem tranquillitatem dei spiritus temperabit.
But when the weaknesses of the body are dissolved, the time of this blessed kingdom is eternal, where there is no weeping, no grieving, no slipping through the change of bodily desire: but one is to live in those things "which," it says, "eye has not seen, nor ear heard, nor has it entered into the heart of man." Understanding, hearing, and sight fail before the good things to come; whatever blessed and eternal thing is promised to the blessed and eternal is neither subject to sight nor grasped by hearing nor perceived by the mind. All these colds of snow, frost, and crystal, then, will be dissolved as by a warm breath when, after the rigors of the night of the world, the Spirit of God will temper those times of the eternal kingdom into one unchangeable tranquility.
147.7CSEL 22:858–859
Atque ut sub niuis et nebulse et crystalli frigore intolerabili, si maneret, dei tamen spiritu in deliquium resoluendo significasse illam aeterni regni seterno populo beatam temperiem nosceremus, psalmum propheta tali confessione conclusit: ante faciem frigoris eius quis subsistit? emittit uerbum suum, et liquefaciet ea; flauit spiritus eius, et fluent aquse. pronuntians uerbum suum in Iacob, iustitias et iudicia sua in Israhel. non fecit taliter omni nationi, et iudicia sua non manifestauit eis. peculiaris haec in Iacob et Israhel dei uoluntas est: non in eum Israhel neque in eum Iacob, qui hoc corporis nomen ad solatium ueluti generosae in se stirpis amplectitur. sed eum Iacob, qui subplantauit priorem, qui primogenita spe seternitatis emit, cui Israhel deum uidendo cognomen est, qui ipse Hierusalem et pacis est ciuitas, qui sedificatus super petram fidei confirmatis portarum seris fortiores portas portarum inferi obtinebit, qui in uerbo dei congregatur, qui non inopia eget, non ssecularis rigoris frigore aduretur, sed liquefactis omnibus et dei spiritu absolutis temperie seternae serenitatis utetur. huic pronuntiatur hoc uerbum, hic per spiritalem intellegentiam has dei iustitias et iudicia expectat. consors boni huius nulla gens alia est, neque hanc iudicii gloriam infidelitas inreligiosa cognoscit. in sua enim uenit, et sui eum non receperunt. quotquot receperunt, dedit his potestatem filios dei fieri dominus noster Iesus Christus, qui est benedictus in saecula saeculorum. amen.
And so that we might know that, under the cold of snow and mist and crystal, unbearable if it remained, yet to be dissolved into melting by God's Spirit, that blessed temperateness of the eternal kingdom for an eternal people was signified, the prophet concluded the psalm with such a confession: "Before the face of his cold who will stand? He sends out his word, and it will melt them; his Spirit has blown, and the waters will flow. Declaring his word to Jacob, his righteousnesses and judgments to Israel. He has not done so for every nation, and his judgments he has not made known to them." This will of God is peculiar to Jacob and Israel: not to that Israel nor to that Jacob who embraces this bodily name as a comfort, as if of a noble stock in himself, but to that Jacob who supplanted the elder, who bought the birthright with the hope of eternity, whose surname from seeing God is Israel; who himself is Jerusalem and the city of peace; who, built upon the rock of faith, the bars of his gates strengthened, will hold gates stronger than the gates of hell; who is gathered in the word of God; who does not lack through want, will not be seared by the cold of worldly rigor, but, all things having been melted and released by God's Spirit, will enjoy the temperateness of eternal serenity. To him this word is declared; he, through spiritual understanding, awaits these righteousnesses and judgments of God. No other nation shares this good, nor does irreligious unbelief know this glory of judgment. "For he came to his own, and his own did not receive him. As many as received him, to them he gave power to become sons of God," our Lord Jesus Christ, who is blessed for ever and ever. Amen.
Tractates 148
148.1CSEL 22:859
Superiores tres psalmi, quibus prophetia nos ad laudem domini aduocat, beatae illius spei nostra distributionem ipso conlocationum suarum ordine sunt secuti. primus enim eorum ob spem seternitatis et caelestis regni expectationem cantatus est. secundus ob sedificationem sanctae ciuitatis et congregationem sanctorum, qui ad plenitudinem sanctae huius ciuitatis conuenient, subsecutus est. tertius ille iam ob gratulationem exsedificatse ciuitatis et aeterno pace fundatae et post saeculi urens arensque frigus caelesti spiritu temperatae in hunc hymnum est comparatus. doctrinae ergo idem est ordo, qui rerum. nam secundum propheticam et apostolicam prsedicationem beati istius regni et ciuitatis aeternae in his ordo dispositus est: in resurrectionis demutatione, in congregatione sanctorum, in dominicorum ciuium confrequentantium incolatu.
The three preceding psalms, in which prophecy calls us to the praise of the Lord, have followed, by the very order of their placing, the distribution of that blessed hope of ours. For the first of them was sung for the hope of eternity and the expectation of the heavenly kingdom. The second followed for the building of the holy city and the gathering of the saints, who will come together to the fullness of this holy city. The third was composed into this hymn for rejoicing over the city now built, founded in eternal peace and, after the burning and parching cold of the world, tempered by the heavenly Spirit. The order of teaching, then, is the same as the order of things. For according to prophetic and apostolic preaching the order of that blessed kingdom and eternal city has been arranged in these: in the change of the resurrection, in the gathering of the saints, in the dwelling of the Lord's citizens thronging together.
148.2CSEL 22:859–860
Post quae iam in aeterna beatitudine omnibus constitutis ad canendas dei laudes hoc consequenti psalmo chorus caelestium uirtutum potestatumque contrahitur, ut ob depulsam saeculi uanitatem creatura omnis ex magnis officiorum suorum laboribus absoluta et in beato regno seternitatis aliquando respirans deum suum et lseta praedicet et quieta et ipsa secundum apostolum in gloriam beatae aeternitatis adsumpta, cum ait: etenim expectatio ipsius creaturae reuelationem filiorum dei expectat. uanitati enim creatura subiecta est non uolens, sed propter eum, qui subdidit in spe, quia et ipsa creatura liberabitur a seruitute corruptionis in libertatem claritatis filiorum dei. hinc ergo hymnus est libertatis indultse, quod officiorum suorum necessitate absoluta, et antea in usus humani subiecta seruitii, iam conformata tandem filiorum dei gloriae in aeternam beatitudinem creationum elementa requiescunt. cuius beatitudinis longo iam diu secundum apostolum Petrum desiderio detinebantur, cum ait: haec, quae modo uobis nuntiata sunt per eos, qui uobis spiritu sancto euangelizauerunt, quae missa sunt a caelo, in qua re concupiscunt angeli prospicere. expectatio itaque caelestium est beatitudo terrena et corruptionis nostrae demutationem diuinarum creationum orant elementa, prospicere hanc euangelicse prsedicationis spem concupiscentia, gloriam suam ex gloriae nostrae conformatione sumptura: quam iam secundum prophetiam psalmi adepta in consonam laudem perceptae beatitudinis aduocantur.
After which, all now being established in eternal blessedness, in this following psalm the choir of heavenly powers and authorities is gathered to sing the praises of God, so that, the vanity of the world having been driven away, all creation, released from the great labors of its duties and at last breathing again in the blessed kingdom of eternity, may proclaim its God, both joyful and at rest, and itself, according to the apostle, taken up into the glory of blessed eternity, when he says: "For the expectation of creation itself awaits the revelation of the sons of God. For creation was subjected to vanity not willingly, but because of him who subjected it in hope, because creation itself too will be freed from the slavery of corruption into the freedom of the glory of the sons of God." Hence, then, this is a hymn of freedom granted, because the elements of creation, released from the necessity of their duties and formerly subjected to the uses of human service, now at last conformed to the glory of the sons of God, rest in eternal blessedness. By a long desire for this blessedness they had already long been held, according to the apostle Peter, when he says: "These things which have now been announced to you through those who preached the gospel to you by the Holy Spirit sent from heaven, into which angels long to look." The expectation of heavenly beings, then, is earthly blessedness, and the elements of the divine creations pray for the change of our corruption, longing to look into this hope of the Gospel preaching, about to take their own glory from the conforming of our glory: which, having now attained it according to the prophecy of the psalm, they are called to harmonious praise of the blessedness received.
148.3CSEL 22:860–861
Laudate dominum de caelis, laudate eum in excelsis. laudate eum omnes angeli eius. laudate eum omnes uirtutes eius. laudate eum sol et luna: laudate eum omnes stellae et lumen. laudate eum caeli caelorum: et aqua, quae super caelos est, laudet nomen domini. quia ipse mandauit, et creata sunt; ipse dixit, et facta sunt; et statuit ea in saeculum et in sseculum saeculi: praeceptum posuit, et non praeteribit. absoluto quidem ad intellegentiam sermone propheta omnes caelestes uirtutes adhortatur ad laudem, sed non sine perfecta ratione doctrinae. primum enim errorem hunc humanae ignorationis auertit, quo fortuitis concursibus hunc mundi habitum in se coisse atque ita ex inordinatione in ordine constitisse quidam ausi sunt opinari; tunc quod alii hunc ipsum mundum deum esse, qui se agat ac moueat et in annuam temperiem cursu demensse rationis moderetur, existiment; postremo quod quaedam sibi ex his ipsis unusquisque legit elementis aut caelum, aut solem, aut aquam, aut aera, quibus dei honorem inani atque impia religione deferrent. omnem igitur errorem ignorationis exclusit dicens: quoniam ipse praecepit, et creata sunt; ipse dixit, et facta sunt. nullus hic fortuitorum concursus, nulla naturae propriae uirtus, nulla seternitatis ex semet substantia in his, quae creata docentur, admittitur.
"Praise the Lord from the heavens; praise him in the heights. Praise him, all his angels; praise him, all his powers. Praise him, sun and moon; praise him, all stars and light. Praise him, heavens of heavens; and let the water that is above the heavens praise the name of the Lord. For he commanded, and they were created; he spoke, and they were made; and he established them for ever and for ever and ever: he set a command, and it will not pass away." In speech plain to understanding the prophet exhorts all the heavenly powers to praise, but not without the perfect reasoning of doctrine. For first he turns away that error of human ignorance by which some have dared to suppose that this order of the world came together of itself by chance collisions and so arose from disorder into order; then that others think this world itself is God, which drives and moves itself and governs itself into the yearly temperateness by a course of measured reason; finally that each chooses for himself some of these elements, whether heaven, or sun, or water, or air, to which to offer the honor of God with empty and impious religion. He excluded every error of ignorance, then, saying: "For he commanded, and they were created; he spoke, and they were made." No chance collisions, no power of their own nature, no substance of eternity from themselves is admitted here in the things that are taught to be created.
148.4CSEL 22:861–862
In quo dicto etiam hoc docetur, quod et Genesis distinxit et euangelia testata sunt et apostolus prsedicauit: dei iussu facta esse omnia, non per se extitisse, tamquam ipsa illa materia oboedientiae ui talis existeret, cum esse ac subsistere iuberetur; sed omnia ex mandato creata esse, et dictum fuisse ab eo, qui dicebat, ut fierent. ita enim Genesis est locuta: et dixit deus... et fecit deus. et nunc propheta ait: dixit, et facta sunt. non enim sibi praecepit, ut fierent, sed sunt facta, cum dixit. facta autem sunt per eum, de quo euangelista testatus est: omnia per ipsum facta sunt, et sine ipso factum est nihil et apostolus ait: qui est imago dei inuisibilis, primogenitus omnis creaturse, quia in ipso condita sunt omnia in cselis et in terra, uisibilia et inuisibilia; siue sedes, siue dominationes, siue principatus, siue potestates, omnia per ipsum et in ipso condita sunt. et Sapientia ita de se locuta est: ego eram apud illum conponens; mihi adgaudebat, cum laetaretur orbe perfecto. cessat itaque ambiguitas intellegentise et noui et ueteris testamenti auctoritate conuicta: patri filium ante saecula manentem in creandi mundi exordio adstitisse.
In this saying this too is taught, which Genesis distinguished, the Gospels testified, and the apostle preached: that all things were made by God's command, not that they came to be of themselves, as though matter itself existed by such a force of obedience when commanded to be and to subsist; but that all things were created by command, and that it was said by him who spoke, that they should be made. For thus Genesis spoke: "And God said ... and God made." And now the prophet says: "He spoke, and they were made." For he did not command himself that they should be made, but they were made when he spoke. And they were made through him of whom the evangelist testified: "All things were made through him, and without him nothing was made"; and the apostle says: "who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation, because in him all things were founded in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible; whether thrones or dominions or principalities or powers, all things were founded through him and in him." And Wisdom spoke thus of herself: "I was with him, setting things in order; he rejoiced in me, when he was glad at the world completed." So the ambiguity of understanding ceases, convicted by the authority of both the New and the Old Testament: the Son, abiding before the ages, stood by the Father at the beginning of creating the world.
148.5CSEL 22:862–863
Causam etiam propheta aliam laudis adiecit: quoniam ipse mandauit, et creata sunt; ipse dixit, et facta sunt; et statuit ea in saeculum et in saeculum sseculi. manent enim ex nihilo substituta et gratiam ex eo, quod sunt, creatori suo debent cum sensu uitae suae bonitatem eius et uirtutem sentientia, per quem uiuere se sentire coeperunt. uiuunt autem adeo, ut et in saeculum saeculi maneant et secundum apostolum reuelationem filiorum dei expectent a corruptionis seruitio in conformem eorum gloriam liberanda. contuendum autem est, in his creaturis, quae in sseculum saeculi sunt statuta, neque caelum hoc, quod firmamentum nuncupatur, neque terram, quse arida dicta est, connumerata fuisse, quia et in prophetis dictum sit: ecce ego facio caelum nouum et terram nouam et dominus in euangelio dixerit: caelum et terra praeteribunt; uerba autem mea non prseteribunt; de quibus non huius loci sermo est. tantum illud ad admonitionem commemorandum a nobis fuit, non dissolubiles creationes nunc ad laudem dei fuisse numeratas, sed eas, quae in seternitatis sunt substantiam constitutae. ac ne forte, quod in aeternum manerent, naturale illis esse ex substantise suae beatitudine crederetur, subiecit: praeceptum posuit, et non praeteribit, ut hoc, quod sunt, id est, ut maneant in aeternum, non naturae suae esse intellegatur, sed prsecepti eius sit, qui potens sit rebus ex nihilo substitutis naturam aeternitatis adferre. non enim, inquit, praeteribit prseceptum, id est mandati eius non erit finis: quia in aeternum maneant, quibus aeternitatem uirtus aeternitatis indulsit.
The prophet added another cause of praise too: "For he commanded, and they were created; he spoke, and they were made; and he established them for ever and for ever and ever." For things established out of nothing remain and owe thanks to their creator for the fact that they exist, perceiving with the sense of their life the goodness and power of him through whom they began to perceive that they live. And they live so that they remain for ever and ever and, according to the apostle, await the revelation of the sons of God, to be freed from the slavery of corruption into a glory conformed to theirs. But we must observe that among these creatures established for ever and ever neither this heaven, which is called the firmament, nor the earth, which was called the dry land, was counted, since it is said in the prophets, "Behold, I make a new heaven and a new earth," and the Lord said in the Gospel, "Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will not pass away"; of which this is not the place to speak. This much only had to be mentioned by us as a reminder: that it is not dissoluble creations that have now been counted for the praise of God, but those that have been established in the substance of eternity. And lest perhaps it be believed that their remaining for ever was natural to them from the blessedness of their substance, he added: "He set a command, and it will not pass away," so that this, that they are, that is, that they remain for ever, might be understood not to be of their nature but of the command of him who is able to bring the nature of eternity to things established out of nothing. For the command, he says, will not pass away, that is, there will be no end of his mandate: because those remain for ever to whom the power of eternity has granted eternity.
148.6CSEL 22:863
Post quas rursum terrena cetera aduocantur ad laudem, quae, etsi non omnia sunt horum caelestium et beatorum bonorum consortia, partim per inrationabilem sensum, partim per inanimale naturae, partim per impietatis offensam, tamen deum per id, quod talia sunt instituta, ipsa institutionis in se habitae prouidentia praedicant. ait enim ita: laudate dominum de terra dracones et omnes abyssi. ignis, grando, nix, crystallum, spiritus procellse. quae faciunt uerbum eius, montes et omnes colles, ligna fructifera et omnes cedri, bestise et uniuersa pecora, serpentes et uolucres pinnatae, reges terrae et omnes populi, principes et omnes iudices terrae, iuuenes et uirgines, seniores cum iunioribus laudent nomen domini. omnia laudem dei concinunt, licet quaedam sensu laudis carentia sint: sed per institutionis ordinem qualitatemque gignendi prseconium creatoris ostendunt. detenti in terra dracones eorumque plures in abyssis demersi, ut nos intra metum et religionem, dum ipsi intra abyssum terramque religati impietatis nostrse poenis praeparantur, coercerent. natura ignis, niuis candor, crystalli glacies, procellse spiritus, montium celsitas, distinctio collium, arborum fructus, bestiarum uarietas, pecorum utilitas, serpentium nisus, uolucrum uolatus, regum potestas, populorum famulatus, principum dignitas, iudicum aequitas, aetatum omnium et sexuum mores, studia, uirtutes, haec itaque omnia in diuersos ineffabilesque usus formata, distincta, animata, perfecta, creatoris prouidentiam laudant. et eorum, quae aut inanima aut inrationabilia sunt, qualis laudatio esset, ostendit dicens: quse faciunt uerbum eius: ut ex eo, quod in hunc officiorum suorum sint ordinem constituta, praeconium eius, a quo ita sint instituta, testentur.
After which the other earthly things in turn are called to praise, which, although not all are sharers in these heavenly and blessed goods, partly through irrational sense, partly through the lifelessness of their nature, partly through the offense of impiety, yet proclaim God, by the fact that they were so established, through the very providence of the institution held in them. For he says thus: "Praise the Lord from the earth, dragons and all deeps; fire, hail, snow, ice, stormy wind, which do his word; mountains and all hills, fruitful trees and all cedars; beasts and all cattle, serpents and winged birds; kings of the earth and all peoples, princes and all judges of the earth; young men and maidens, old men with the young, let them praise the name of the Lord." All things join in the praise of God, although some lack the sense of praise; but through the order of their institution and the quality of their begetting they show the proclamation of the Creator. The dragons are held in the earth and many of them sunk in the deeps, so that, while they themselves, bound within the abyss and the earth, are prepared for the punishments of our impiety, they might hold us within fear and religion. The nature of fire, the whiteness of snow, the frozenness of ice, the wind of the storm, the height of mountains, the distinction of hills, the fruits of trees, the variety of beasts, the usefulness of cattle, the striving of serpents, the flight of birds, the power of kings, the service of peoples, the dignity of princes, the equity of judges, the habits, pursuits, and virtues of all ages and sexes: all these, then, formed, distinguished, given life, completed for diverse and ineffable uses, praise the providence of the Creator. And what kind of praise belongs to those that are either lifeless or irrational, he shows, saying: "which do his word": so that by the very fact that they have been set in this order of their duties they bear witness to the praise of him by whom they were so established.
148.7CSEL 22:863–864
Regibus uero et ceteris aliis, tamquam rationis consortibus, haec laudandi causa proposita est: quia exaltatum est nomen eius solius, confessio eius super caelum et terram. et hac quidem deus regum et populorum et principum et iudicum et aetatum omnium constitutione laudabilis est, quod humanae uitae cursum tali diuersorum officiorum temperatione contineat; tamen, quia omnis superior laudatio beati illius regni tempus ostendit, hanc causam laudis adiecit: quia exaltatum est nomen eius solius. tum enim deus unus etiam ab inuitis et intellegitur et uidetur religato diabolo et angelis eius poenae cum eo aeterni ignis addictis et omni spiritalium nequitiarum potestate sublata, cum iam non peccatum, non mors, non terrenus hic mundus sit. ait enim: confessio eius super terram et caelum: exaltabit cornum populi sui, id est in illo beatae ciuitatis illius saeculo, ubi cornum populi sui dominus exaltat et incorruptionem ei, quse significatur in cornu, per honorem inmortalitatis inpertiet. tum enim caelum nouum et terra noua est, cum his praesentibus dissolutis noua illa et aeterna succedent. ideo confessio eius super caelum et terram, quia non in hoc saeculo neque in hoc aere, sed in superioribus locis sedis beati illius regni est constituta.
But to the kings and all the others, as sharers of reason, this cause of praising has been set forth: "for his name alone is exalted; his confession is above heaven and earth." And by this ordering of kings and peoples and princes and judges and all ages, God is indeed praiseworthy, because he holds the course of human life together by such a tempering of different duties; yet, because all the preceding praise shows the time of that blessed kingdom, he added this cause of praise: "for his name alone is exalted." For then the one God is both understood and seen even by the unwilling, when the devil has been bound and his angels assigned with him to the punishment of eternal fire and all power of the spiritual wickednesses taken away, when there is no longer sin, no longer death, no longer this earthly world. For he says: "His confession is above earth and heaven: he will exalt the horn of his people," that is, in that age of that blessed city, where the Lord exalts the horn of his people and will impart to it, through the honor of immortality, the incorruption signified in the horn. For then there is a new heaven and a new earth, when, these present ones dissolved, those new and eternal ones succeed. Therefore his confession is above heaven and earth, because the seat of that blessed kingdom has been established not in this age nor in this air, but in higher places.
148.8CSEL 22:864–865
Et quia illud sanctorum est regnum, per quod regnante domino ad beatum regnum dei patris accedent, psalmum ita propheta conclusit: hymnus omnibus sanctis eius, filiis Israhel, populo adpropinquanti sibi. sanctorum omnis hic hymnus est, qui dominum non ut ceteri reges aut principes aut iudices pro uirtutis et confessionis admiratione laudent, sed pro gaudio consummatae in se beatitudinis et gratulatione cantantium: sancti scilicet, qui Israhel filii sunt, deo propinquantes; non illi utique, de quibus dictum est: plebs haec labiis me honorat, cor autem eorum longe est a me, sed hi, qui merebuntur audire: prope est dominus omnibus inuocantibus eum. illis ergo proprius hymnus est, qui deo propinquabunt, qui per hoc sanctae Hierusalem regnum beatum aeterno regno proximi post regnum domini Iesu Christi in regnum dei patris domino conregnante transibunt apostolo docente: cum tradet regnum deo patri, cum euacuauerit omnem principatum et omnem potestatem et uirtutem. oportet enim eum regnare, donec ponat omnes inimicos sub pedibus eius. omnibus enim subiectis sub pedibus eius nouissima euacuatur mors. cum dixerit: omnia subiecta sunt prseter illum, qui ei subiecit omnia, tunc ipse subiectus erit illi, qui ei subiecit omnia, ut deus sit omnia in omnibus. hic ergo populus est propinquans regno dei patris per regnum filii dei proximus. regnat itaque dominus traditurus deo patri regnum, non regni potestate cariturus, sed nos, qui regnum eius sumus, deo patri traditurus in regnum. regni traditio nostra prouectio est, ut, qui in regno filii erimus, in regno quoque simus et patris, digni per id regno patris, quia digni regno erimus et filii, proximi tum patris regno, cum filii erimus in regno, qui est benedictus in saecula saeculorum. amen.
And since that is the kingdom of the saints, through which, the Lord reigning, they will come to the blessed kingdom of God the Father, the prophet concluded the psalm thus: "A hymn for all his saints, for the sons of Israel, a people drawing near to him." This whole hymn belongs to the saints, who praise the Lord not, as the other kings or princes or judges, out of wonder at his power and confession, but out of the joy of blessedness completed in them and the rejoicing of those who sing: the saints, namely, who are the sons of Israel, drawing near to God; certainly not those of whom it is said, "This people honors me with their lips, but their heart is far from me," but those who will deserve to hear: "The Lord is near to all who call upon him." The hymn is proper, then, to those who will draw near to God, who, through this blessed kingdom of the holy Jerusalem, nearest to the eternal kingdom, will pass after the kingdom of the Lord Jesus Christ into the kingdom of God the Father, the Lord reigning with them, as the apostle teaches: "when he hands over the kingdom to God the Father, when he has abolished every principality and every power and might. For he must reign until he puts all enemies under his feet. For when all things have been subjected under his feet, the last enemy, death, is abolished. When he says, All things have been subjected, except him who subjected all things to him, then he himself will be subject to him who subjected all things to him, that God may be all in all." This, then, is the people drawing near to the kingdom of God the Father, nearest through the kingdom of the Son of God. So the Lord reigns, about to hand over the kingdom to God the Father, not to lose the power of the kingdom, but to hand us, who are his kingdom, over to God the Father into the kingdom. The handing over of the kingdom is our advancement, so that we who will be in the kingdom of the Son may also be in the kingdom of the Father, worthy of the Father's kingdom through this, that we shall be worthy of the Son's kingdom too, nearest then to the Father's kingdom when we shall be in the kingdom of the Son, who is blessed for ever and ever. Amen.
Tractates 149
149.1CSEL 22:865–866
Superior psalmus omnem creationum diuersitatem ad laudem dei creatoris est adhortatus; et ordo a caelestibus coeptus cuncta terrae ac maris et seris animantia percucurrit uniuerso quoque genere aetatum, sexuum, potestatum ad honorem debitae confessionis admonito, ut gloriam eius, qui se ad uitam animasset, firmasset, ornasset, pius gratiarum sermo celebraret. postquam, ut dignum fuit, propheta psalmi ipsius fine proprium officii sui munus expleuerat, omnibus quidem ad laudem diuinam adhortatis hymnum tamen esse sanctorum eius ostendit: filiis scilicet Israhel, populo, qui fieret deo proximus, ut, cum uniuersitas omnis deum ex uitse suse sensu et gratulatione laudasset, Israhel tamen ei solus adpropians hymnum ex cognitionis ac dignationis diuinse familiaritate cantaret. post quae nunc ad cantandum deo nouum canticum incitamur. et forte nihil ultra reliquisse psalmus anterior nouitatis admirationisque credatur, cum si quid illud in gratulatione nostra sensuque sit, idipsum in laude oportere esse praescriptum sit. efferre autem se ultra caelestem sedem mens nostra non sufficit; sed laudare deum ea, quae supra caelos sunt, admonentur. rursum autem se tendere ultra abyssi immensitatem intellegentise nostrae opinio non potest; uerum ea, quae in his sunt, ad laudis officium aduocantur. iam uero ipsa illa natura seris in grandine, niue, crystallo procellseque spiritu concinere gloriam tantae laudis iubetur. tum porro uniuersitas generis humani in regibus, in principibus, in iudicibus, in omni uel aetatis flore uel senectutis maturitate dei laudem cantare praecepta est; quia haec omnia sibi inperturbato cursu moderatoque consistant, fluantque uniuersa ita naturae suae lege praecepta, ut decedere his ex ea, qua creata sunt, constitutione non liceat.
The preceding psalm exhorted every diversity of creatures to the praise of God the Creator; and the order, begun from heavenly things, ran through all the living things of earth and sea and air, the whole range of ages, sexes, and powers too being admonished to the honor of due confession, so that pious speech of thanksgiving might celebrate the glory of him who had given them life, made them firm, and adorned them. After the prophet, as was fitting, had fulfilled the proper gift of his duty at the end of that psalm, while all were exhorted to divine praise, he yet showed that the hymn belongs to his saints: namely, to the sons of Israel, the people that would become nearest to God, so that, while the whole universe praised God from the sense and rejoicing of its life, Israel alone, drawing near to him, might sing the hymn from the familiarity of knowledge and divine condescension. After which we are now urged to sing a new song to God. And perhaps the earlier psalm might be thought to have left nothing further of newness and wonder, since whatever there is in our rejoicing and sense, that very thing has been prescribed to be in praise. For our mind is not able to lift itself beyond the heavenly seat; but the things that are above the heavens are admonished to praise God. Again, the notion of our understanding cannot stretch itself beyond the immensity of the abyss; but the things in them are called to the duty of praise. Now the very nature of the air in hail, snow, ice, and the wind of the storm is commanded to sing together the glory of so great a praise. Then further the whole human race, in kings, princes, judges, in every bloom of youth or ripeness of old age, has been commanded to sing God's praise; because all these hold together in an undisturbed and moderated course, and all things flow so commanded by the law of their nature that they may not depart from the order in which they were created.
149.2CSEL 22:866–867
Cum ergo nulla extra haec rerum diuinarum cselestiumque decreta uideatur homini concessa esse cognitio cognitionisque laudatio, uideamus, ad quod nunc nouum canticum aduocemur, cum dicitur: cantate domino canticum nouum. est plane nouum canticum. cuius quidem noui cantici gratulationem iam et in superioribus psalmis, in quibus nouum canticum cantatur, ostendimus: cum in gentibus dominus esse regnaturus ostenditur, cum ipsum ad regni gloriam dextera sua saluabit, cum adsumens ex inferno animam suam nos secum adsumpsit in reges. proprium ergo hoc canticum nouum est sanctis eius. id enim sequitur: laudatio eius in ecclesia sanctorum. lsetetur Israhel in eo, qui fecit eum, et filii Sion exultent super regem suum: laudent nomen eius in choro, in tympano et psalterio psallant ei; id est in eo, qui secundum nonagesimi et quinti psalmi canticum nouum regnabit in gentibus et quem in sequenti cantico nouo in mirabilibus factis suis dominum saluabit dextera sua. super hoc igitur rege laetatur Israhel et Sion filii, eius scilicet Sion, quse mater in caelis est, quae conscriptorum primitiuorum et angelorum frequentantium ciuitas est, et Israhel ille, qui spiritu, non littera et super quem apostoli pax est. hi ergo filii, qui suscipientes confitentesque regem filii dei facti sunt, et hi ergo, qui in corpore deum mentis oculis agnouerunt, lsetabuntur in choro, in tympano psalterioque psallentes. haec autem musa laetitiae in tabernaculis iustorum est, et in symphoniae cantu cantus in reditu filii paenitentis auditur.
Since, then, beyond these decrees of divine and heavenly things no knowledge, and no praise from knowledge, seems to have been granted to man, let us see to what new song we are now called, when it is said: "Sing to the Lord a new song." It is plainly a new song. The rejoicing of this new song we have already shown in the preceding psalms in which a new song is sung: when the Lord is shown to be going to reign among the nations, when his right hand will save him for the glory of the kingdom, when, taking up his soul from the underworld, he took us up with him as kings. This new song, then, is proper to his saints. For there follows: "His praise is in the church of the saints. Let Israel rejoice in him who made him, and let the sons of Zion exult over their king; let them praise his name in the dance, let them sing psalms to him with timbrel and psaltery": that is, in him who, according to the new song of the ninety-fifth psalm, will reign among the nations, and whom, in the following new song, his right hand will save as Lord in his wonderful deeds. Over this king, then, Israel and the sons of Zion rejoice: of that Zion, namely, who is the mother in heaven, which is the city of the enrolled firstborn and of thronging angels, and that Israel which is in spirit, not in letter, and upon which is the apostle's peace. These sons, then, who, receiving and confessing the king, have become sons of God, and these, who recognized God in the body with the eyes of the mind, will rejoice in the dance, singing psalms with timbrel and psaltery. And this music of joy is in the tents of the righteous, and in the song of the symphony the song at the return of the penitent son is heard.
149.3CSEL 22:867–868
Quse autem nunc proprie post creaturarum laudationem et superiora cantica noua huius cantici noui causa esset, ostendit dicens: quia beneplacitum est domino in populo suo: exaltabit mansuetos in salutem. exultabunt sancti in gloria. omnia quidem deo, cum sunt creata, placuerunt Genesi testante, cum dicit: et uidit deus, quia bona sunt; sed beneplacitum ei in populo suo esse cognoscimus. bona quidem creatio hominis est, quia quae initium creationis secundum originem dei similitudinemque sortita est; sed iudicio se immutabilis dei secundum demutationem humanae uoluntatis atque arbitrii temperante tum, quia peccassent et agerent paenitenda, psenitere se, quia fecisset hominem, testatus est. at uero ipsis illis ex peccato in uitam reformatis depulsa psenitentise querella iam beneplaciti in eos adfectus ostenditur. reconciliati enim sumus per corpus et sanguinem Christi ex inimicis in filios deo, cum nobis aeterni sacerdotis placationem inpsenitenti sacramento spopondisset propheta dicente: iurauit dominus, non psenitebit eum: tu es sacerdos in aeternum secundum ordinem Melchisedech. complacitum ergo est, quod inpsenitens esse iuratum est ei, quo regnante secundum ordinem Melchisedech, id est gentium et rege et sacerdote primum mansuetis salus, deinde splendor est sanctis exultantibus super regem suum.
And what now, properly, after the praise of creatures and the earlier new songs, was the cause of this new song, he shows, saying: "For the Lord is well pleased in his people; he will exalt the meek unto salvation. The saints will exult in glory." All things indeed pleased God when they were created, as Genesis testifies, when it says, "And God saw that they were good"; but we learn that his good pleasure is in his people. The creation of man is indeed good, since it received the beginning of creation according to the origin and likeness of God; but, the judgment of the unchangeable God tempering itself according to the change of human will and choice, then, because they had sinned and were doing what was to be repented of, he testified that he repented that he had made man. But when they themselves were reformed from sin into life, the complaint of repentance was driven away and the disposition of good pleasure toward them is now shown. For we have been reconciled to God from enemies into sons through the body and blood of Christ, since the prophet had promised us the propitiation of an eternal priest by an oath without repentance, saying: "The Lord has sworn and will not repent: You are a priest for ever according to the order of Melchizedek." It is well-pleasing, then, because it was sworn to be without repentance to him, in whose reign, according to the order of Melchizedek, that is, king and priest of the Gentiles, there is first salvation for the meek, then splendor for the saints exulting over their king.
149.4CSEL 22:868–870
Sed post sanctorum gloriam intellegendum est, quid ad cantici noui plenitudinem consequatur: lsetabuntur in cubilibus suis. exultationes dei in gutture eorum, et gladii bis acuti in manibus ipsorum. iam non lacrimis stratum rigabitur, nec in hoc mortis corpore degentium ob peccati necessitatem ac dolorem noctibus singulis lectus lauabitur. in cubilibus enim iam suis sancti lsetabuntur in gloria, et ob id dei exultationes semper in gutture. per significationem gutturis internae conscientise protestatur adfectum. sed neque solum in eorum gutture exultatio dei est, uerum etiam ipsorum manus bis acutis gladiis armabuntur. hsec filiis Sion cognitio regis indulgit, quibus in choris tympanisque psallentibus disposita sit et salus et gloria et laetitia et exultatio et potestas. nam potestatem in gladio significari tum plurimis locis, tum consequentibus admonemur. cur enim bis acuti gladii in manibus eorum essent, edocuit mox propheta dicens: ad faciendam uindictam in nationibus, obiurgationes in populis; ad alligandos reges eorum in compedibus et nobiles eorum in manicis ferreis, ut faciant in his iudicium conscriptum: gloria hsec est omnibus sanctis eius. hoc ergo est canticum nouum, cum humiles terrae tribulatique corde regibus, constituantur in reges, cum existimati purgamenta mundi et uel abortiua gentium lumen mundi et ultores sint nationum. gladii enim bis acuti in manibus eorum sunt, quia sancto illi in Apocalypsi gladius bis acutus ex ore sit, iudicium undique potestatis exercens. nam et gladium uenit dominus mittere in terram, et sancti secundum apostolum mundum iudicabunt et in illis iudicabitur mundus. dictum est enim: aut nescitis, quia angelos estis iudicaturi? fit ergo per eos uindicta in nationibus; deus enim in nobis est ultionum. obiurgatio deinde exeritur in populos; fidelis namque est, qui ait: arguam te et statuam hsec contra faciem tuam. sed argutionis huius hic exitus est, ut reges nationum nobilesque earum manicis et compede uinciantur. uincti enim manibus et pedibus secundum euangelia in exteriores tenebras deputantur. et quia illic erit fletus et stridor dentium, fiet iudicium conscriptum, quod lex scilicet praescripserat, quod prophetae nuntiauerant, quod omnis diuinus fuerat sermo testatus. hoc fides, pietas, continentia, confessio habet meritum, hoc contemptus saeculi muneris sumit: fieri regem regum, quorum odia ob Christi nomen excepta sint, uinciri nobiles, quorum nos uincula carceresque concluserint; conscriptum in eos iudicium habetur, quorum et gladii desseuierint et potestas. sic sanctorum gloria omnis a deo est, cum post has uitse et corporum passiones egerant potestatem. sic cantici noui hymnus impletur, cum post gentium obprobrium regumque cruciatus iudicium conscriptum in gentes regesque decernant, quibus dominus Iesus Christus et unigenitus deus et dominus et rex est, qui est benedictus in saecula saeculorum. amen.
But after the glory of the saints we must understand what follows for the fullness of the new song: "They will rejoice on their couches. The exultations of God are in their throat, and two-edged swords in their hands." No longer will the bed be watered with tears, nor will the couch be washed each night because of the necessity and grief of sin of those living in this body of death. For on their couches the saints will now rejoice in glory, and therefore the exultations of God will always be in their throat. Through the meaning of the throat he declares the disposition of the inner conscience. But not only is the exultation of God in their throat; their hands too will be armed with two-edged swords. This the knowledge of the king has granted to the sons of Zion, for whom, singing psalms in dances and timbrels, salvation and glory and joy and exultation and power have been arranged. For that power is signified by the sword we are admonished both in very many places and in what follows. For why there would be two-edged swords in their hands the prophet soon taught, saying: "to execute vengeance on the nations, rebukes among the peoples; to bind their kings in fetters and their nobles in iron shackles, that they may execute on them the written judgment: this glory is for all his saints." This, then, is the new song: when the lowly of the earth and the contrite of heart are made kings over kings, when those thought the refuse of the world and as it were born out of due time become the light of the world and the avengers of the nations. For two-edged swords are in their hands, because from the mouth of that holy one in the Apocalypse comes a two-edged sword, exercising judgment of power on every side. For the Lord came to send a sword on the earth, and the saints, according to the apostle, will judge the world, and by them the world will be judged. For it is said: "Or do you not know that you will judge angels?" Vengeance on the nations, then, is done through them; for God in us is the God of vengeance. Rebuke then is brought out against the peoples; for faithful is he who says: "I will rebuke you and set these things before your face." But the outcome of this rebuke is this: that the kings of the nations and their nobles are bound with shackles and fetters. For, bound hand and foot, according to the Gospels, they are consigned to the outer darkness. And since there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth there, the written judgment will be done, which the law, namely, had prescribed, which the prophets had announced, which every divine word had testified. This is the merit that faith, piety, continence, and confession have; this the contempt of the world receives as its reward: to be made king over kings whose hatreds have been endured for Christ's name; that nobles be bound whose chains and prisons enclosed us; the written judgment is held against those whose swords and power raged. So all the glory of the saints is from God, when after these sufferings of life and bodies they exercise power. So the hymn of the new song is fulfilled, when, after the reproach of the nations and the tortures of kings, they decree the written judgment against nations and kings, for whom the Lord Jesus Christ is both only-begotten God and Lord and king, who is blessed for ever and ever. Amen.
Tractates 150
150.1CSEL 22:870–871
Magnis psalmorum librum sacramentis rerum caelestium refertum esse saepe tractauimus, uel cum dispositio singulorum contra temporis gestorumque rationem ordinem numerumque sortita sit, uel cum superscriptiones nonnullae aliter, quam Hebrseorum libris continentur, adscriptae sunt, uel cum tituli plures, cum nulli sint, praeferantur. cum ergo ultra litterae opinionem celsioris intellegentiae sensu uolumen digestum sit, oportuit idipsum digno fine concludi, ut secundum gloriosam spei nostrae perfectionem liber quoque tanti prophetae consummatus existeret. primum enim in eum est numerum distributus, qui ex tripartito quinquagesimo numero esset explendus, cum neque in Hebraeis numerus singulis quibusque conexus sit, et plerique apud eos psalmi, quo minus hic triplicis quinquagesimae numerus conueniret, iuncti sunt. fuit ergo in translatoribus hoc intellegentise spiritalis, ut congestam hanc in plurimis continuatamque seriem partirentur in numerum, ut psalmorum omnium hic et ordo et numerus, qui in his tribus quinquagesimis est, possit expleri, totiusque libri idem hic quasi status existeret. qui fidei, ut in quinquagesimo psalmo centesimoque tractauimus, quorum unus secundum praescripta legis post sabbatorum sabbata confessionem peccati remissionemque conplexus est, alius sub eiusdem numeri plenitudine non indulgentiam peccati, sed fructum officiumque iustitise conprehendit. post quae rursum aedificata iam in aeternum dei ciuitate et omnibus ad gratulationem eius laudemque commonitis sub eiusdem rursum numeri potestate spes est consummata sanctorum, iam ad spiritalem omnibus gloriam naturamque renouatis, ut gradatim per hoc ad dei consortium ueniretur, cum peccatorum remissio uitae innocentiam et iudicii constantiam mereretur, uitse autem innocentis iudiciique constantia spiritalis gloriae sumeret dignitatem. ac sic omnia, baptismum, resurrectio, demutatio continentur, cum prima nos libri huius quinquagesima regeneret ad innocentiam, sequens ad iudicium innocentise resurrectione perducat, tertia in naturam spiritus et laudem constituat. post uinctos enim compedibus reges ligatosque manicis nobiles et sanctorum iudicium conscriptum, cum in his omnibus gloria constitisset, gloriae tamen ipsius consummatio hsec secuta est.
We have often treated that the book of Psalms is filled with great mysteries of heavenly things: whether because the arrangement of each has received an order and number contrary to the reasoning of time and events, or because some superscriptions have been ascribed otherwise than they are contained in the books of the Hebrews, or because many titles are set at the head where there are none. Since, then, the volume has been arranged with the sense of a loftier understanding beyond the opinion of the letter, it was fitting that it be concluded with a worthy end, so that the book of so great a prophet too might stand completed according to the glorious perfection of our hope. For first it was divided into that number which was to be filled up by the threefold fifty, although among the Hebrews the number is not connected with each one, and among them many psalms were joined, so that this number of three fifties would not fit. There was, then, this spiritual understanding in the translators: that they divided into number this series heaped up and run together in very many places, so that this order and number of all the psalms, which is in these three fifties, might be filled up, and this might stand as the state, as it were, of the whole book. Of faith, as we treated in the fiftieth and hundredth psalms, of which one, according to the prescriptions of the law, after the sabbaths of sabbaths, embraced the confession of sin and its remission; the other, under the fullness of the same number, comprehends not the pardon of sin but the fruit and duty of righteousness. After which again, the city of God now built for ever and all admonished to rejoice over it and praise it, under the power of the same number again the hope of the saints is completed, all now renewed to spiritual glory and nature, so that by steps through this one might come to fellowship with God, since the remission of sins would earn innocence of life and constancy of judgment, and the innocence of life and constancy of judgment would take on the dignity of spiritual glory. And so all are contained: baptism, resurrection, change, since the first fifty of this book regenerates us to innocence, the next leads us by resurrection to the judgment of innocence, the third establishes us in the nature of the spirit and in praise. For after the kings bound in fetters and the nobles tied with shackles and the written judgment of the saints, when glory had consisted in all these, yet this completion of glory itself followed.
150.2CSEL 22:871–872
Superior a proximo psalmus ad laudem nos dei ob creationum magnificentiam aduocauit; sed post cantici noui hymnum deus non adhuc in operibus laudandus, sed laudandus in sanctis est, quos post iudicium conscriptum in seternitatis gloriam collocauerit et indemutabiles iam caelesti honore donauerit: per quod in uirtutis suae laudandus sit firmamento, quia firmamentum aeternae uirtutis inuexerit absorpta in contentione morte, cum corruptionem incorruptio deuorauerit. et idcirco firmamentum uirtutis laus sequitur potestatum, quia mortem inmortalitas consumpserit tribuens, quod oculus non uidit, nec cor cogitauit, nec auris audiuit. ***** in sanctis et ad laudem *** suas ******* deus secundum apostolum nos ante mundi constitutionem in caelestibus spiritali benedictione benedixit; ad cuius laudis gloriam omnia et uocis et operum officia incitant diuersitate habitationum et claritate. laudamus idcirco in cymbalis bene sonantibus; in cymbalis exultationis laus ista perficitur. quse laus omnis in sanctis est, quod ab his corruptionem carnis sanguinisque depulerit, quod ad imaginem creatoris sui sint reformati, quod conformes iam esse gloriae corporis dei coeperint, quod in omnem dei plenitudinem inpleantur, quod, cum deus spiritus sit, deum tamen non caro iam sit laudatura, sed spiritus.
The psalm before the preceding called us to the praise of God for the magnificence of the creations; but after the hymn of the new song, God is no longer to be praised in his works, but to be praised in his saints, whom after the written judgment he will have placed in the glory of eternity and given, now unchangeable, a heavenly honor: for which he is to be praised in the firmament of his power, because he will have brought in the firmament of eternal power, death being swallowed up in victory, when incorruption will have devoured corruption. And therefore the praise of powers follows the firmament of power, because immortality will have consumed death, granting what eye has not seen, nor heart thought, nor ear heard. ... in the saints and for the praise ... his ... God, according to the apostle, blessed us before the foundation of the world with spiritual blessing in the heavenly places; to the glory of whose praise all the duties both of voice and of works incite, by the diversity of dwellings and by brightness. We praise therefore with well-sounding cymbals; this praise is completed with cymbals of exultation. And all this praise is in the saints: that he has driven away from them the corruption of flesh and blood, that they have been reformed to the image of their creator, that they have now begun to be conformed to the glory of God's body, that they are filled with all the fullness of God, that, since God is spirit, it will no longer be flesh but spirit that will praise God.