The Conferences 1.14–2.1

Latin text: Petschenig, CSEL 13 (Latin text: Michael Petschenig (CSEL 13, 1886), digitized by Open Greek and Latin, University of Leipzig (csel-dev), CC BY-SA 4.0).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0). Compare: Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, series 2, vol. 11 (1894).

Show

Chapter 1

1.14CSEL 13:21–25

Quamobrem in hoc corpore constitutus iam nouerit unusquisque illi se regioni uel ministerio deputandum, cuius in hac uita semet ipsum participem cultoremque praebuerit, illiusque se etiam in illo perenni saeculo consortem futurum esse non ambigat, cui nunc ministrum se sociumque maluerit exhibere, secundum sententiam domini ita dicentis: si quis mihi ministrat, me sequatur, et ubi sum ego, illic et minister meus erit. nam quemadmodum diaboli regnum per coniuentiam suscipitur uitiorum, ita regnum dei per exercitationem uirtutum puritate cordis ac spiritali scientia possidetur. ubi autem regnum dei est, ibi procul dubio et uita habetur aeterna, et ubi regnum diaboli est, ibi mortem atque infernum esse non dubium est. in quo qui fuerit, nec laudare dominum potest secundum prophetae sententiam dicentis: non mortui laudabunt te, domine: neque omnes, qui descendunt in infernum (sine dubio: peccati). sed nos, inquit, qui uiuimus (non uitiis scilicet nec mundo huic, sed deo), benedicamus dominum, ex hoc nunc et usque in saeculum. non enim est in morte qui memor est dei: in inferno autem (peccati) quis confitebitur domino? id est nemo. nullus enim, tametsi milies semet ipsum uel Christianum esse profiteatur uel monachum, cum peccat confitetur deum, nullus admittens ea quae dominus execratur reminiscitur dei, nec seruum se ueraciter illius profitetur, cuius praecepta contumaci temeritate contemnit. in qua morte illam uiduam quae est in deliciis beatus apostolus esse pronuntiat uidua, inquiens, quae in deliciis est, uiuens mortua est. sunt ergo multi qui uiuentes in hoc corpore mortui sunt et in inferno iacentes deum laudare non possunt, et e contrario sunt qui cum mortui sint corpore, deum spiritu benedicunt atque conlaudant secundum illud: benedicite spiritus et animae iustorum dominum, et: omnis spiritus laudet dominum. et in Apocalypsi animae occisorum non solum laudare deum, sed etiam interpellare dicuntur. in euangelio quoque euidentius dominus ad Sadducaeos non legistis, inquit, quod dictum est a deo dicente uobis: ego sum deus Abraham et deus Isaac et deus Iacob? non est deus mortuorum sed uiuentium. omnes enim ei uiuunt. de quibus et apostolus propter quod, inquit, non confunditur deus uocari deus eorum: parauit enim illis ciuitatem. nam quia nec otiosae sint post separationem huius corporis neque nihil sentiant, etiam euangelii parabola quae de illo paupere Lazaro et diuite purpurato profertur ostendit, quorum unus beatissimam sedem, id est sinus Abrahae requiem promeretur, alius intolerabili ardore aeterni ignis exuritur. si autem et illud quod dicitur ad latronem: hodie mecum eris in paradiso uoluerimus intendere, quid aliud manifeste significat quam perdurare in animabus non solum pristinos intellectus, sed etiam uicissitudine eas congrua pro meritorum actuumque suorum perfrui qualitate? hoc enim illi nequaquam dominus promisisset, si eius animam nosset, post separationem carnis uel priuandam sensu uel in nihilum resoluendam. non enim caro eius in paradiso, sed anima erat ingressura cum Christo. cauenda sane, immo toto horrore est detestanda prauissima haereticorum illa distinctio, qui dum non credunt Christum potuisse eodem die quo in inferna descendit etiam in paradiso repperiri, ita distingunt amen dico tibi hodie, et interposita distinctione inferunt mecum eris in paradiso, ut scilicet haec promissio non statim post transitum uitae huius inpleta, sed post resurrectionis aduentum intellegatur inplenda, non intellegentes illud quod ante resurrectionis suae diem protulit ad Iudaeos, qui eum ut semet ipsos credebant humanis angustiis et carnali infirmitate concludi: nemo ascendit in caelum nisi qui de caelo descendit, filius hominis qui est in caelo. quibus manifeste probatur animas defunctorum non solum suis sensibus non priuari, sed ne istis quidem affectibus, id est spe atque tristitia, gaudio ac metu carere, et ei eis quae sibi in illo generali examine reseruantur quiddam eas iam incipere praegustare, nec secundum opinionem quorundam infidelium in nihilum eas resolui post huius commorationis excessum, sed uiuacius subsistere deique laudibus intentius inhaerere. et re uera, ut sequestratis paulisper testimoniis scripturarum de ipsius animae natura secundum mediocritatem sensus nostri paucis aliqua disputemus, nonne ultra omnis ineptiae non dicam fatuitatem, sed insaniam est uel leuiter suspicari illam pretiosiorem hominis portionem, in qua etiam imago dei secundum beatum apostolum ac similitudo consistit, deposita hac qua retunditur in praesenti sarcina corporali insensibilem fieri, quae omnem rationis uim in se continens etiam mutam atque insensibilem materiam carnis participatione sui facit esse sensibilem, cum utique consequens sit et hoc rationis ipsius ordo contineat, ut exuta mens ista carnali qua nunc hebetatur pinguedine intellectuales uirtutes suas in melius reparet et puriores eas ac subtiliores recipiat potius quam amittat. in tantum autem hoc quod dicimus beatus apostolus uerum esse cognoscit, ut etiam optet ab hac carne discedere, ut separatione eius enixius ualeat domino copulari, dicens: desiderium habeo dissolui et cum Christo esse, multo enim melius, quoniam dum sumus in corpore peregrinamur a domino. et idcirco audemus et bonam uoluntatem habemus magis peregrinari a corpore et praesentes esse ad dominum. propter quod etiam contendimus siue absentes siue praesentes placere illi, commorationem scilicet animae quae in hac carne est peregrinationem a domino atque absentiam a Christo esse pronuntians eiusque ab hac carne separationem atque discessum praesentiam esse ad Christum tota credulitate confidens. et euidentius iterum super hoc ipso uiuacissimo animarum statu idem apostolus sed accessistis, inquit, ad Sion montem et ciuitatem dei uiuentis, Hierusalem caelestem, et ad multorum milium angelorum frequentiam, et ecclesiam primitiuorum qui conscripti sunt in caelis, et spiritus iustorum perfectorum. de quibus spiritibus in alio loco deinde patres, inquit, carnis nostrae habuimus eruditores et reuerebamur: non multo magis subiciemur patri spirituum et uiuemus?

“Therefore let each one know, while he is still in this body, that he will be assigned to that region or service in which he has shown himself a sharer and worker in this life; and let him not doubt that in that eternal age he will be the companion of the one whose servant and associate he now chooses to show himself, according to the saying of the Lord: ‘If anyone serves me, let him follow me; and where I am, there my servant will be also.’ For as the kingdom of the devil is taken up by connivance with the vices, so the kingdom of God is possessed by the practice of the virtues, in purity of heart and spiritual knowledge. Where the kingdom of God is, there without doubt eternal life is found; and where the kingdom of the devil is, there death and hell undoubtedly are. One who is in it cannot praise the Lord, according to the saying of the prophet: ‘The dead shall not praise you, O Lord, nor all those who go down into hell’ (of sin, without doubt). ‘But we,’ he says, ‘who live’ (that is, not to the vices nor to this world, but to God), ‘will bless the Lord from this time forth and for evermore.’ ‘For in death there is no one who remembers God; and in hell’ (of sin) ‘who will confess the Lord?’ That is, no one. For no one, though he declares a thousand times that he is a Christian or a monk, confesses God while he sins; no one who does what the Lord detests remembers God, nor truly declares himself the servant of one whose commands he despises with stubborn rashness. In this death the blessed apostle declares that widow to be who lives in pleasures: ‘The widow who lives in pleasures is dead while she lives.’ There are many, then, who while living in this body are dead, and lying in hell cannot praise God; and, on the contrary, there are those who, though dead in body, bless and praise God in the spirit, according to the words, ‘Bless the Lord, you spirits and souls of the righteous,’ and, ‘Let every spirit praise the Lord.’ And in the Apocalypse the souls of the slain are said not only to praise God but also to plead with him. In the Gospel, too, the Lord says still more plainly to the Sadducees: ‘Have you not read what was spoken by God, saying to you, I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob? He is not the God of the dead but of the living; for all live to him.’ Of them the apostle also says: ‘Therefore God is not ashamed to be called their God; for he has prepared a city for them.’ That souls are not idle after separation from this body, and do not lack all feeling, is shown also by the Gospel parable about the poor man Lazarus and the rich man clothed in purple: one of them wins the most blessed seat, that is, the rest of Abraham's bosom; the other is burned by the unbearable heat of eternal fire. And if we will consider what is said to the thief, ‘Today you will be with me in paradise,’ what else does it plainly mean than that there remains in souls not only their former understanding, but also that they enjoy a fitting lot according to the character of their merits and deeds? The Lord would never have promised him this if he had known that his soul, after separation from the flesh, would either be deprived of feeling or dissolved into nothing. For it was not his flesh but his soul that was to enter paradise with Christ. We must certainly beware of, and indeed detest with all horror, that most perverse punctuation of the heretics, who, not believing that Christ could be found in paradise on the same day on which he descended into hell, punctuate thus: ‘Truly I say to you today,’ and after the break add, ‘you will be with me in paradise’; so that this promise is understood as fulfilled not immediately after the passing of this life but after the coming of the resurrection. They do not understand what he said to the Jews before the day of his resurrection, who believed that he, like themselves, was confined by human limits and fleshly weakness: ‘No one has ascended into heaven except he who came down from heaven, the Son of Man who is in heaven.’ By these things it is plainly proved that the souls of the dead are not only not deprived of their senses, but do not lack even such affections as hope and sadness, joy and fear, and that they already begin to have some foretaste of what is reserved for them at that general judgment; and that they are not, as some unbelievers think, dissolved into nothing after departing this dwelling, but live on more vigorously and cling more intently to the praises of God. And indeed, to set aside the testimonies of Scripture for a moment and reason a little about the nature of the soul itself, as far as our modest understanding allows: is it not beyond, I will not say the foolishness, but the madness of all absurdity, even slightly to suspect that the more precious part of a human being, in which, according to the blessed apostle, the image and likeness of God consists, becomes senseless when this bodily burden that now dulls it is laid aside? For it contains in itself the whole power of reason, and by sharing itself makes even the dumb and senseless matter of the flesh sensible. Surely it follows, and the very order of reason requires, that the mind, stripped of this fleshly grossness by which it is now dulled, should restore its intellectual powers for the better and receive them purer and finer rather than lose them. So true does the blessed apostle know this to be that he even wishes to depart from this flesh, so that by separation from it he may be joined more closely to the Lord, saying: ‘I have a desire to depart and to be with Christ, for it is much better’; ‘for while we are in the body we are absent from the Lord. And therefore we are confident and have a good will rather to be absent from the body and to be present with the Lord. Therefore we also strive, whether absent or present, to please him.’ He declares that the soul's dwelling in this flesh is absence from the Lord and separation from Christ, and trusts with full faith that its separation and departure from this flesh is presence with Christ. And again, still more clearly, the same apostle says of this most living state of souls: ‘But you have come to Mount Zion and the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem, and to the company of many thousands of angels, and to the church of the firstborn who are enrolled in heaven, and to the spirits of the righteous made perfect.’ Of these spirits he says in another place: ‘Then we had fathers of our flesh who corrected us, and we revered them: shall we not much more be subject to the Father of spirits and live?’”

John 12:26 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 115:17 (113:25 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 115:18 (113:26 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 6:5 (6:6 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Tim 5:6 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 150:6 (quotation, high confidence) · Rev 6:9 (allusion, high confidence) · Rev 6:10 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 22:31 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 22:32 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 20:38 (quotation, high confidence) · Heb 11:16 (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 16:22 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 16:24 (allusion, high confidence) · Luke 23:43 (quotation, high confidence) · John 3:13 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 1:26 (allusion, medium confidence) · Phil 1:23 (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Cor 5:6 (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Cor 5:8 (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Cor 5:9 (quotation, high confidence) · Heb 12:22 (quotation, high confidence) · Heb 12:23 (quotation, high confidence) · Heb 12:9 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Each person will share hereafter in the kingdom he serves now; Moses shows from Scripture and reason that souls after death remain conscious and live more fully, and rejects a heretical punctuation of Luke 23:43.

  • The parenthetical glosses (“of sin”, “not to the vices… but to God”) are Cassian's own additions to the psalm text. His rejection of the punctuation “Truly I say to you today, you will be with me in paradise” is translated as written.
  • John 12:26; Ps 115:17–18 (113:25–26 LXX); Ps 6:5 (6:6 LXX); 1 Tim 5:6; Ps 150:6; Rev 6:9–10; Matt 22:31–32 (Luke 20:38); Heb 11:16; Luke 16:19–31; Luke 23:43; John 3:13; Gen 1:26; Phil 1:23; 2 Cor 5:6–9; Heb 12:22–23; Heb 12:9. “Bless the Lord, you spirits and souls of the righteous” is from the Song of the Three Young Men (Dan 3:86 LXX/Vulgate).

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR of a question mark as P; OCR slip; OCR slip (a for u); OCR slip (e for s); OCR slip (k for h); OCR slip (n for u); OCR slip (ne for uc); OCR slips (joined words, o for c); stray mark inside a word; two words joined): et nita habetur → et uita habetur; quis confitebitur domino P id est → quis confitebitur domino? id est; etin Apooalypsi → et in Apocalypsi; Abra.ham → Abraham; kodie → hodie; actuamque → actuumque; resoitendam → resoluendam; reeurrectionis → resurrectionis; nemoascendit → nemo ascendit; hominisqui → hominis qui; et re aera → et re uera; paneis aliqua → paucis aliqua.

Extrabiblical texts: Pr Azar Dan 3:86 (Prayer of Azariah and Song of the Three Young Men [in RC, EO, ETH canons]; quotation)

Topics: Eschatology, Heresy

Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 1.14 (CSEL 13:21–25; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/1-14/#p-1-14). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-1-14) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).

1.15CSEL 13:25–26

Contemplatio uero dei multifarie concipitur. nam deus non sola inconprehensibilis illius substantiae suae admiratione cognoscitur, quod tamen adhuc in spe promissionis absconditum est, sed etiam creaturarum suarum magnitudine uel aequitatis suae consideratione uel cotidianae dispensationis auxilio peruidetur: quando scilicet quae cum sanctis suis per singulas generationes egerit mente purissima perlustramus, cum potentiam ipsius qua uniuersa gubernat, moderatur ac regit, cum inmensitatem scientiae eius et oculum quem secreta cordium latere non possunt tremente corde miramur, cum harenam maris undarumque numerum dimensum ei et cognitum cogitamus, cum pluuiarum guttas, cum saeculorum dies et horas, cum praeterita futuraue uniuersa obstupescentes scientiae eius adsistere contemplamur: cum ineffabilem clementiam eius, qua innumera flagitia, quae singulis quibusque momentis sub ipsius committuntur aspectu, indefessa longanimitate sustentat, cum uocationem, qua nos nullis praecedentibus meritis gratia suae miserationis adsciuit, cum denique quot occasiones salutis tribuit adoptandis cum quodam admirationis intuemur excessu: quod ita nos nasci praecepit, ut ab ipsis cunabulis gratia nobis legisque suae notitia traderetur, quod ipse aduersarium uincens in nobis pro solo bonae uoluntatis adsensu aeterna beatitudine ac perpetuis nos praemiis muneratur, cum postremo dispensationem incarnationis suae pro nostra salute suscepit ac mirabilia mysteriorum suorum in cunctis gentibus dilatauit. sunt autem aliae quoque huiusmodi innumerae contemplationes, quae pro qualitate uitae ac puritate cordis in nostris sensibus oriuntur, quibus deus uel uidetur mundis obtutibus uel tenetur. quas profecto nullus perpetuo retentabit, in quo adhuc aliquid carnalium uiuit affectuum, quia non poteris, ait dominus, uidere faciem meam: non enim uidebit me homo et uiuet, scilicet mundo huic affectibusque terrenis.

“The contemplation of God, however, is conceived in many ways. For God is known not only by wonder at his incomprehensible substance, which is still hidden in the hope of the promise, but he is also seen in the greatness of his creatures, or in the consideration of his justice, or in the help of his daily providence: when with a most pure mind we survey what he has done with his saints in each generation; when with trembling hearts we wonder at the power by which he governs, directs, and rules all things, at the immensity of his knowledge, and at the eye from which the secrets of hearts cannot be hidden; when we think of the sand of the sea and the number of the waves as measured and known to him; when in amazement we contemplate the drops of rain, the days and hours of the ages, and all things past and future as present to his knowledge; when we behold with a kind of ecstasy of wonder his unspeakable mercy, by which with unwearied patience he bears the countless crimes committed every moment in his sight; the calling by which, with no merits of ours going before, he took us up by the grace of his compassion; and finally how many occasions of salvation he grants to those who are to be adopted: that he ordained us to be born in such a way that grace and the knowledge of his law were handed on to us from the very cradle; that he himself, overcoming the adversary in us, rewards us with eternal blessedness and everlasting rewards for the mere consent of a good will; and lastly, when he undertook the dispensation of his incarnation for our salvation and spread the wonders of his mysteries among all nations. There are also countless other contemplations of this kind, which arise in our minds according to the quality of our life and our purity of heart, by which God is either seen or held by pure eyes. No one, surely, will keep them permanently in whom anything of fleshly affections still lives, because, the Lord says, ‘You cannot see my face; for no one shall see me and live’ — that is, live to this world and to earthly affections.”

Exod 33:20 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: God is contemplated in many ways, in his creation, justice, providence, mercy, and incarnation, but no one in whom fleshly affections still live can hold such contemplation permanently.

  • The sand of the sea, the drops of rain, and the days of the ages echo Sir 1:2. Exod 33:20, with Cassian's gloss.
  • “For the mere consent of a good will” (pro solo bonae uoluntatis adsensu) is ambiguous: it may mean our consent or God's good pleasure; translated literally.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip (n for u)): pernidetur → peruidetur.

Extrabiblical texts: Sir 1:2 (Sirach [in RC, EO, ETH canons]; echo)

Topics: Prayer

Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 1.15 (CSEL 13:25–26; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/1-14/#p-1-15). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-1-15) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).

1.16CSEL 13:26

GERMANVS: Quid ergo est quod etiam nolentibus, immo uero etiam nescientibus nobis ita superfluae cogitationes subtiliter ac latenter inrepunt, ut non solum eas expellere, uerum etiam intellegere ac deprehendere difficultatis inmodicae sit? potest ergo mens aliquando ab istis uacua repperiri et numquam huiuscemodi inlusionibus incursari?

Germanus: “How is it, then, that superfluous thoughts creep in on us so subtly and secretly, even against our will, and indeed without our knowing it, that it is exceedingly difficult not only to drive them out but even to notice and detect them? Can the mind, then, ever be found free of them and never be assailed by such illusions?”

Notes and citation

Summary: Germanus asks whether the mind can ever be free of stray thoughts that creep in unnoticed.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR of a question mark as P): difficultatis inmodicae sit P potest → difficultatis inmodicae sit? potest.

Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 1.16 (CSEL 13:26; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/1-14/#p-1-16). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-1-16) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).

1.17CSEL 13:26–27

MOVSES: Mentem quidem non interpellari cogitationibus inpossibile est, suscipere uero eas siue respuere omni studenti possibile est. quemadmodum igitur ortus earum non omnimodis pendet a nobis, ita reprobatio uel electio consistit in nobis. nec tamen ex eo quod diximus inpossibile esse mentem cogitationibus non adiri, totum uel incursui uel illis spiritibus tribuendum est qui eas nobis nituntur ingerere. alioquin nec liberum in homine maneret arbitrium nec in nobis staret nostrae correctionis industria. sed est, inquam, nostrum magna ex parte, ut cogitationum qualitas emendetur et uel sanctae ac spiritales in cordibus nostris uel terrenae carnalesque concrescant. ideo namque frequens lectio et iugis adhibetur meditatio scripturarum, ut exinde nobis spiritalis memoriae praebeatur occasio, idcirco decantatio crebra psalmorum, ut adsidua nobis exinde conpunctio ministretur, idcirco uigiliarum ac ieiuniorum orationumque sedulitas adhibetur, ut extenuata mens non terrena sapiat, sed caelestia contempletur. quibus rursum neglegentia inrepente cessantibus necesse est ut mens uitiorum squalore concreta in carnalem partem mox inclinetur et conruat.

Moses: “It is impossible for the mind not to be approached by thoughts; but it is possible for anyone who makes the effort to accept or reject them. So, just as their arising does not wholly depend on us, their rejection or choice lies with us. Yet from our saying that it is impossible for the mind not to be approached by thoughts, it must not all be attributed either to their onset or to the spirits who try to put them into us. Otherwise free will would not remain in a human being, nor would the effort to correct ourselves be in our power. But it is, I say, largely up to us that the quality of our thoughts be amended, and that either holy and spiritual thoughts or earthly and fleshly ones grow in our hearts. This is why frequent reading and constant meditation on the Scriptures are practised, so that from them we may be given the occasion of spiritual remembrance; why the psalms are sung often, so that from them constant compunction may be supplied to us; why diligence in vigils, fasts, and prayers is practised, so that the mind, made lean, may not savor earthly things but contemplate heavenly ones. When these cease through creeping negligence, the mind, hardened by the filth of the vices, must soon incline toward the fleshly side and fall.”

Notes and citation

Summary: Thoughts will come, but it lies with us to accept or reject them, and reading, psalmody, vigils, and fasting shape what kind of thoughts grow in the heart.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip (e for c)): eonruat → conruat.

Topics: Ethics

Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 1.17 (CSEL 13:26–27; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/1-14/#p-1-17). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-1-17) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).

1.18CSEL 13:27

Quod exercitium cordis non incongrue molarum similitudini conparatur, quas meatus aquarum praeceps impetu rotante prouoluit. quae nullatenus quidem cessare possunt ab opere suo aquarum inpulsibus circumactae: in eius uero qui praeest situm est potestate, utrumnam triticum malit an hordeum loliumue comminui. illud quippe est procul dubio conmolendum, quod ingestum ab illo fuerit cui operis illius cura commissa est. ita igitur etiam mens per uitae praesentis incursus undique ingruentibus temptationum torrentibus circumacta uacua quidem cogitationum aestibus esse non poterit: quales uero uel amittere uel parare sibi debeat, studii ac diligentiae suae prouidebit industria. si enim ut diximus ad sanctarum scripturarum meditationem iugiter recurramus ac memoriam nostram ad recordationem spiritalium rerum et desiderium perfectionis spemque futurae beatitudinis erigamus, necesse est ut ortae cogitationes exinde spiritales in his quae meditati sumus mentem faciant inmorari. sin uero desidia seu neglegentia superati uitiis et otiosis confabulationibus occupemur seu curis mundanis et superfluis sollicitudinibus inplicemur, consequenter exinde uelut quaedam zizaniorum species generata operationem quoque nostro cordi noxiam ministrabit, et secundum sententiam domini saluatoris ubi fuerit thesaurus operum seu intentionis nostrae, ibi et cor nostrum necessario permanebit.

“This exercise of the heart is fittingly compared to millstones, which the headlong current of water turns with its whirling force. They can by no means stop their work while they are driven round by the force of the waters; but it lies in the power of the one in charge whether he prefers wheat, barley, or darnel to be ground. What is put in by the one entrusted with the care of that work is certainly what must be ground. So too the mind, driven round by the torrents of temptation pouring in from every side in the assaults of the present life, cannot be free of the surge of thoughts; but what kind it should reject or prepare for itself, the effort of its own zeal and diligence will provide. For if, as we have said, we continually return to meditation on the holy Scriptures and raise our memory to the remembrance of spiritual things, the desire for perfection, and the hope of future blessedness, the spiritual thoughts that arise from them must make the mind dwell on what we have meditated. But if, overcome by sloth or negligence, we are taken up with vices and idle talk, or entangled in worldly cares and superfluous anxieties, then a kind of darnel will spring up from them and supply our heart with harmful work as well; and according to the saying of the Lord and Savior, where the treasure of our works or intention is, there our heart must remain.”

Matt 6:21 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 13:25 (echo, low confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The mind is like a mill that must always grind; whether it grinds good grain or darnel depends on what we put in through meditation or negligence.

  • Matt 6:21; the darnel echoes Matt 13:25.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip (I for l, e for c); OCR slip (e for c)): studii ae diligentiae → studii ac diligentiae; inpIieemur → inplicemur.

Topics: Ethics

Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 1.18 (CSEL 13:27; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/1-14/#p-1-18). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-1-18) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).

1.19CSEL 13:27–29

Illud sane prae omnibus nosse debemus tria cogitationum nostrarum esse principia, id est ex deo, ex diabolo et ex nobis. et ex deo quidem sunt, cum spiritus sancti inlustratione nos uisitare dignatur, erigens nos ad sublimiorem profectum, et in quibus uel minus adquisiuimus uel desidiose agentes superati sumus saluberrima conpunctione castigat, uel cum reserat nobis caelestia sacramenta et propositum nostrum ad meliores actus uoluntatemque conuertit. ut ibi cum rex Asuerus castigatus a domino libros annales instigatur inquirere, quibus Mardochaei beneficia recordatus summi eum gradu honoris exaltat ac protinus crudelissimam super nece gentis Iudaeae sententiam reuocat. uel cum propheta commemorat: audiam quid loquatur in me dominus deus. alius quoque et dixit, inquit, angelus, qui loquebatur in me. uel cum dei filius uenturum se una cum patre et mansionem apud nos facturum esse promittit. et: non estis uos qui loquimini, sed spiritus patris uestri qui loquitur in uobis. et uas electionis: experimentum quaeritis eius qui in me loquitur Christi. ex diabolo uero cogitationum nascitur series, cum subuertere nos tam uitiorum oblectatione quam etiam occultis conatur insidiis, subtilissima calliditate mala pro bonis fraudulenter ostentans et transfigurans se nobis in angelum lucis. uel cum euangelista refert: et cena facta cum diabolus iam misisset in corde Iudae Simonis Scariotae ut traderet dominum. et iterum post buccellam, inquit, introiuit in illum Satanas. Petrus quoque ad Annaniam quare, ait, temptauit Satanas cor tuum, mentiri te spiritu sancto. et illud quod in euangelio multo ante per Ecclesiasten praedictum legimus: si spiritus potestatem habentis ascenderit super te, locum tuum ne dimittas. illud quoque quod dicitur ad deum contra Achab in tertio Regnorum libro ex persona spiritus inmundi: egrediar et sero spiritus mendax in ore omnium prophetarum eius. ex nobis autem oriuntur, cum eorum quae gerimus uel gessimus uel audiuimus naturaliter recordamur. de quibus beatus Dauid cogitaui, inquit, dies antiquos, et annos aeternos in mente habui, et meditatus sum, nocte cum corde meo exercitabar, et scopebam spiritum meum. et iterum: dominus scit cogitationes hominum, quoniam uanae sunt, et: cogitationes iustorum iudicia. in euangelio quoque dominus ad Pharisaeos: quid cogitatis mala in cordibus uestris?

“Above all we ought to know that there are three sources of our thoughts: from God, from the devil, and from ourselves. They are from God when he deigns to visit us with the illumination of the Holy Spirit, raising us to higher progress; when he chastens us with most wholesome compunction where we have gained too little or been overcome by acting slothfully; or when he opens heavenly mysteries to us and turns our purpose and will to better actions. So it was when King Ahasuerus, chastened by the Lord, was prompted to search the books of the annals, by which he remembered the good deeds of Mordecai, raised him to the highest rank of honor, and at once revoked the most cruel sentence for the slaughter of the Jewish nation. Or when the prophet says: ‘I will hear what the Lord God speaks in me.’ Another also says: ‘And the angel who spoke in me said.’ Or when the Son of God promises that he will come together with the Father and make his dwelling with us; and, ‘It is not you who speak, but the Spirit of your Father who speaks in you’; and the chosen vessel: ‘You seek a proof of Christ who speaks in me.’ A train of thoughts arises from the devil when he tries to overthrow us both by the delight of the vices and by hidden snares, deceitfully showing evil things as good with the subtlest cunning and transforming himself before us into an angel of light. Or when the evangelist relates: ‘And when supper was over, the devil having already put it into the heart of Judas Iscariot, son of Simon, to betray the Lord’; and again, ‘After the morsel,’ he says, ‘Satan entered into him.’ Peter also says to Ananias: ‘Why has Satan tempted your heart, that you should lie to the Holy Spirit?’ And what we read in the Gospel, foretold long before by Ecclesiastes: ‘If the spirit of the one who has power rises up against you, do not leave your place.’ Also what is said to God against Ahab in the third book of Kingdoms, in the person of an unclean spirit: ‘I will go out and be a lying spirit in the mouth of all his prophets.’ They arise from ourselves when we naturally remember what we are doing, have done, or have heard. Of these the blessed David says: ‘I thought of the days of old, and had the eternal years in mind; and I meditated; by night I communed with my heart, and searched my spirit.’ And again: ‘The Lord knows the thoughts of men, that they are vain’; and, ‘The thoughts of the righteous are judgments.’ In the Gospel, too, the Lord says to the Pharisees: ‘Why do you think evil in your hearts?’”

Esth 6:1 (allusion, high confidence) · Ps 85:8 (84:9 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Zech 1:9 (quotation, medium confidence) · John 14:23 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 10:20 (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Cor 13:3 (quotation, high confidence) · Acts 9:15 (echo, high confidence) · 2 Cor 11:14 (allusion, high confidence) · John 13:2 (quotation, high confidence) · John 13:27 (quotation, high confidence) · Acts 5:3 (quotation, high confidence) · Eccl 10:4 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Kgs 22:22 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 77:5 (76:6 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 77:6 (76:7 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 94:11 (93:11 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Prov 12:5 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 9:4 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Thoughts come from three sources, God, the devil, and ourselves, each illustrated from Scripture.

  • Esth 6:1–3, 8:5 (the revoked decree); Ps 85:8 (84:9 LXX); Zech 1:9 (and elsewhere in Zech 1–4); John 14:23; Matt 10:20; 2 Cor 13:3 (“chosen vessel”, Acts 9:15); 2 Cor 11:14; John 13:2, 27; Acts 5:3; Eccl 10:4 (Cassian says it was foretold “in the Gospel … by Ecclesiastes”; the phrase is as printed); 1 Kgs 22:22 (3 Kingdoms); Ps 77:5–6 (76:6–7 LXX); Ps 94:11 (93:11 LXX); Prov 12:5; Matt 9:4.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip (I for l); OCR slip (b for p); OCR slip (i for l); stray full stop): IIIud sane → Illud sane; uenturum se una. cum → uenturum se una cum; euangeiista → euangelista; scobebam → scopebam.

Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 1.19 (CSEL 13:27–29; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/1-14/#p-1-19). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-1-19) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).

1.20CSEL 13:29–32

Hanc igitur tripertitam rationem oportet nos iugiter obseruare et uniuersas cogitationes quae emergunt in corde nostro sagaci discretione discutere, origines earum et causas auctoresque primitus indagantes, ut quales nos eis praebere debeamus ex illorum merito qui eas suggerunt considerare possimus, ut efficiamur secundum praeceptum domini probabiles trapezitae. quorum summa peritia est ac disciplina probare quodnam sit aurum purissimum et ut uulgo dicitur obrizum quodue sit minus purgatione ignis excoctum, aereo quoque uilique denario, si pretiosum nomisma sub colore auri fulgentis imitetur, prudentissima discretione non falli, et non solum nomismata tyrannorum uultus exprimentia sapienter agnoscere, sed etiam illa, quae sunt ueri quidem regis imagine, sed non legitime figurata, peritia sagaciore discernere, deinde ne quid illis a legitimo pondere deminutum sit censura trutinae diligenter inquirere. quae omnia nos quoque spiritaliter obseruare debere euangelicus sermo sub huius nominis demonstrat exemplo: primum ut quidquid cordibus inrepserit nostris uel si quod nobis dogma fuerit intromissum, utrumne sit diuino illo et caelesti spiritus sancti igne purgatum an ad Iudaicam superstitionem pertinens seu de saecularis philosophiae tumore descendens in superficie tantum praeferat pietatem, diligentissime perscrutemur. quod ita poterimus implere, si illud apostolicum fecerimus: nolite omni spiritui credere, sed probate spiritus si ex deo sint. quo genere illi quoque decepti sunt, qui post professionem monachi nitore sermonis et quibusdam sunt philosophorum dogmatibus inlecti, quae prima fronte piis quibusdam sensibus ac religioni consonis audientes uelut auri fulgore fallentia, quos semel superficie inlexerant, uelut nomismatibus aereis falsisque deceptos perpetuo nudos ac miseros reddiderunt, uel ad saeculi eos strepitum reuocantes uel ad haereticos errores ac praesumptiones tumidas pertrahentes. quod etiam Achor in libro Iesu Naue legimus fuisse perpessum, qui de castris Allophylorum ligulam auream concupiscens atque furatus anathemate percuti atque aeterna meruit morte damnari. secundo sollicite nos explorare conueniet, ne auro purissimo scripturarum praua interpretatio coaptata metalli pretiositate nos fallat. in quo etiam domino saluatori callidissimus diabolus uelut homini simplici temptauit inponere, dum ea, quae generaliter sunt super omnium iustorum intellegenda personis, maliuola interpretatione conrumpens specialiter huic qui angelorum custodia non egebat conatur aptare dicens: quia angelis suis mandabit de te, ut custodiant te in omnibus uiis tuis: et in manibus portabunt te, ne forte offendas ad lapidem pedem tuum: pretiosa scilicet eloquia scripturarum callida adsumptione conuertens et ad contrarium sensum noxiumque detorquens, et imaginem tyrannici uultus sub colore nobis auri fallentis obiciat. siue cum paracharaximis nos conatur inludere, quoddam scilicet pietatis opus admonens adfectandum, quod non de legitima seniorum procedens moneta sub praetextu uirtutum ducit ad uitia, uel inmoderatis inconpetentibusque ieiuniis seu uigiliis nimiis uel orationibus inordinatis uel incongrua lectione decipiens ad noxium pertrahit finem. uel cum intercessiones ac uisitationes pias persuadet inpendere, quibus nos a spiritalibus monasterii claustris et secreto amicae quietis excutiat, sollicitudines etiam curasque suscipere religiosarum ac destitutarum suggerit feminarum, ut huiusmodi laqueis monachum inextricabiliter inretitum perniciosarum sollicitudinum occupatione distendat. uel certe cum desiderare sanctum clericatus officium sub praetextu aedificationis multorum et amore lucri spiritalis instigat, per quod nos ab humilitate propositi huius ac districtione diuellat. quae omnia cum sint nostrae saluti professionique contraria, tamen uelamine quodam misericordiae ac religionis obtecta facile inperitos incautosque decipiunt. imitantur enim nomismata ueri regis, quia uidentur ad praesens plena pietatis, sed non sunt a legitimis monetariis, id est probatis et catholicis patribus figurata nec de cardinali ac publica conlationis eorum prodeunt officina, sed furtim fraude daemonum fabricata non sine detrimento inperitis quibusque et ignorantibus ingeruntur. quae quamuis utilia ac necessaria uideantur ad praesens, tamen si soliditati professionis nostrae incipiant post haec esse contraria et totum quodammodo corpus nostri labefactare propositi, tamquam necessarium quidem, sed scandalizans membrum et quod dextrae manus uel pedis agere uideatur officium proici a nobis atque abscidi salubre est. satius enim est absque unius praecepti membro, id est operatione uel fructu in ceteris sanum firmumque durare et tamquam debilem introire in regnum caelorum, quam cum soliditate mandati incidere in aliquod scandalum, quod perniciosa consuetudine separans nos a districtionis regula atque adrepti propositi disciplina inducat in tale dispendium, quod nequaquam futura detrimenta conpensans omnes praeteritos fructus totumque operationis nostrae corpus gehennae faciat ignibus concremari. de his generibus inlusionum etiam in Prouerbiis eleganter exprimitur: sunt uiae quae uidentur rectae esse uiro, nouissima autem earum uenient in profundum inferi, et iterum: malignus nocet cum se commiscuerit iusto, id est diabolus decipit cum fuerit colore sanctitatis obtectus. odit autem sonum tutelae, id est discretionis uim quae de seniorum uerbis ac monitione procedit.

“We must therefore constantly observe this threefold distinction and examine with shrewd discernment all the thoughts that arise in our heart, first tracing their origins, causes, and authors, so that we can consider how we ought to treat them according to the merit of those who suggest them, and so become, according to the Lord's command, approved money-changers. Their highest skill and training is to test what is the purest gold, what is commonly called refined, and what has been less purified by fire; not to be deceived, by most prudent discernment, by a cheap copper coin if it imitates a precious one under the color of shining gold; not only to recognize wisely coins bearing the faces of usurpers, but also, with sharper skill, to detect those which bear the image of the true king but are not lawfully struck; and finally to examine carefully with the scales whether anything has been taken from their lawful weight. The Gospel saying, by the example of this term, shows that we too must observe all these things spiritually. First, whatever has crept into our hearts, or any teaching that has been introduced to us, we must examine most carefully to see whether it has been purified by that divine and heavenly fire of the Holy Spirit, or whether it belongs to Jewish superstition or comes down from the pride of worldly philosophy and displays piety only on the surface. We shall be able to do this if we follow the apostolic saying: ‘Do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits whether they are from God.’ In this way those also were deceived who, after professing themselves monks, were enticed by elegance of speech and by certain teachings of the philosophers. Hearing at first sight some ideas that seemed pious and in keeping with religion, these deceived them like the gleam of gold, and, like copper and counterfeit coins, left those they had once enticed by their surface stripped and wretched for ever, either calling them back to the noise of the world or dragging them into heretical errors and swollen presumption. This is what we read in the book of Joshua that Achan suffered: coveting and stealing a golden bar from the camp of the Philistines, he deserved to be struck with the curse and condemned to eternal death. Second, we must carefully examine that a perverse interpretation fitted to the purest gold of the Scriptures does not deceive us by the preciousness of the metal. In this way the most cunning devil tried to impose even on the Lord and Savior, as though on a simple man: corrupting by a malicious interpretation what is to be understood generally of all the righteous, he tries to apply it specially to him who had no need of the guardianship of angels, saying: ‘For he shall give his angels charge concerning you, to keep you in all your ways; and in their hands they shall bear you up, lest you dash your foot against a stone.’ So, by cunningly taking up the precious words of the Scriptures and twisting them to a contrary and harmful sense, he presents to us the image of a usurper's face under the color of deceptive gold. Or when he tries to deceive us with counterfeits, urging us to take up some work of piety which, not proceeding from the lawful coinage of the elders, leads to vices under the pretext of virtue; or, deceiving us by immoderate and unsuitable fasts, or excessive vigils, or disordered prayers, or unsuitable reading, draws us to a harmful end. Or when he persuades us to spend ourselves in pious intercessions and visits, by which he may shake us out of the spiritual enclosure of the monastery and the secrecy of friendly quiet; he suggests that we take on the cares and anxieties of religious and destitute women, so that, having ensnared the monk inextricably in such nets, he may distract him with the occupation of harmful cares. Or else he urges us to desire the holy office of the clergy, under the pretext of the edification of many and the love of spiritual gain, in order to tear us away from the humility and strictness of our way of life. All these things, though they are contrary to our salvation and profession, nevertheless, covered with a veil of mercy and religion, easily deceive the unskilled and unwary. For they imitate the coins of the true king, since for the present they seem full of piety; but they are not struck by lawful moneyers, that is, by approved and catholic fathers, nor do they come from the principal and public workshop of their conference, but are secretly forged by the fraud of demons and passed, not without loss, to the unskilled and ignorant. Though they seem useful and necessary for the present, yet if afterwards they begin to be contrary to the soundness of our profession and in some way to shake the whole body of our purpose, it is wholesome for us to cast them off and cut them away, like a member which is necessary but causes stumbling, and seems to perform the office of the right hand or foot. For it is better to remain sound and firm in the rest without one member of a command, that is, its practice or fruit, and to enter the kingdom of heaven as though maimed, than with the command intact to fall into some stumbling block which, separating us by a harmful habit from the rule of strictness and the discipline of the way of life we have taken up, leads us into such loss that, never making up for future damage, it causes all our past fruits and the whole body of our work to be burned in the fires of Gehenna. These kinds of illusions are also elegantly expressed in Proverbs: ‘There are ways that seem right to a man, but their end comes into the depth of hell’; and again: ‘The evil one does harm when he mingles with the righteous’, that is, the devil deceives when he is covered with the color of holiness; ‘but he hates the sound of safety’, that is, the power of discernment which comes from the words and admonition of the elders.”

1 John 4:1 (quotation, high confidence) · Josh 7:21 (allusion, high confidence) · Ps 91:11 (90:11 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 91:12 (90:12 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 4:6 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 5:29 (allusion, medium confidence) · Matt 5:30 (allusion, medium confidence) · Matt 18:8 (allusion, medium confidence) · Prov 14:12 (quotation, high confidence) · Prov 11:15 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Like skilled money-changers, monks must test every thought and teaching for its true metal, its lawful stamp, and its weight, since the devil disguises harmful projects, even pious ones, as good.

  • “Be approved money-changers” is a saying not found in the Gospels, often cited by early writers as a word of the Lord (an agraphon); Cassian calls it the Lord's command.
  • Achan's theft (Josh 7:21) is of a golden bar; Cassian writes “from the camp of the Philistines” (Allophyli) where the biblical account has Jericho.
  • 1 John 4:1; Josh 7:21; Ps 91:11–12 (90:11–12 LXX) as quoted in Matt 4:6; Matt 5:29–30 (18:8–9); Prov 14:12 (16:25); Prov 11:15 LXX.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slip (a for u); OCR slip (n for u); OCR slips; OCR v for u (the edition prints u); line-break hyphen and OCR 9 for s; stray marks and OCR slips; stray marks splitting a word; two words joined): obsernare → obseruare; aostris vel → nostris uel; probate spiritas → probate spiritus; qao genere → quo genere; noaismatibus → nomismatibus; ALiophylorum → Allophylorum; +++ sperialiter huie → specialiter huic; enstodiant → custodiant; sab colore → sub colore; adfeetandum → adfectandum; non delegitima → non de legitima; interoessiones → intercessiones; spiritalibas → spiritalibus; occupati.. one → occupatione; vel certe cum → uel certe cum; oum sint nostrae salnti → cum sint nostrae saluti; prae- 9ens → praesens; quam cam soliditate → quam cum soliditate; inlnsionum etiam in Fronerbiis → inlusionum etiam in Prouerbiis.

Extrabiblical texts: Agraphon be approved money-changers (Sayings of Jesus outside the Gospels (agrapha); allusion)

Topics: Heresy, Church office

Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 1.20 (CSEL 13:29–32; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/1-14/#p-1-20). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-1-20) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).

1.21CSEL 13:32–33

In quo etiam abbatem Iohannem, qui Lyci commoratur, nouimus nuper inlusum. nam cum exhausto corpore atque defecto perceptionem cibi biduano ieiunio distulisset, accedenti ei ad refectionem die postero ueniens diabolus in figura Aethiopis taetri atque ad eius genua prouolutus, indulge, inquit, mihi, quia ego tibi hunc laborem indixi. itaque ille uir tantus et in discretionis ratione perfectus sub colore continentiae incongruenter exercitae intellexit se ob hoc calliditate diaboli circumuentum talique distentum ieiunio, ut lassitudinem non necessariam, immo etiam spiritui nocituram fatigato corpori superponeret, paracharaximo scilicet inlusus nomismate, dum in illo ueri regis imaginem ueneratus parum discutit an esset legitime figuratum. ultima uero obseruatio huius probabilis trapezitae, quam de inquisitione ponderis esse praediximus, taliter inplebitur, si quidquid gerendum cogitatio nostra suggesserit omni scrupulo retractantes atque in nostri pectoris trutina conlocantes aequilibratione iustissima perpendamus, an plenum sit honestate communi, an timore dei sit graue, an integrum sensu, an humana ostentatione aut aliqua nouitatis praesumptione sit lene, an meriti eius pondus inanis cenodoxiae non inminuerit uel adroserit gloria. et sic ea protinus ad examen publicum trutinantes, id est ad prophetarum et apostolorum actus ac testimonia conferentes uel tamquam integra atque perfecta et illis conpensantia teneamus, uel tamquam inperfecta atque damnosa nec illorum ponderi consonantia omni cautione ac diligentia refutemus.

“In this way, we know, Abba John, who lives at Lycus, was recently deceived. When his body was exhausted and worn out and he had put off taking food through a two-day fast, the devil came to him the next day, as he was going to his meal, in the form of a foul Ethiopian, and throwing himself at his knees said: ‘Forgive me, for it was I who laid this labor on you.’ So that great man, perfect in the practice of discernment, understood that under the color of an abstinence practised unsuitably he had been circumvented by the devil's cunning and drawn into such a fast that he imposed on his tired body a weariness that was unnecessary, and even harmful to the spirit. He had been deceived by a counterfeit coin: while he venerated the image of the true king on it, he did not examine closely enough whether it had been lawfully struck. The last observance of this approved money-changer, which we said concerns testing the weight, will be fulfilled in this way: if, reconsidering with all scruple whatever our thought suggests should be done, and placing it on the scales of our breast, we weigh with the most just balance whether it is full of the common good, whether it is heavy with the fear of God, whether it is sound in meaning, or whether it is light through human display or some presumption of novelty, and whether the glory of empty vainglory has not diminished or clipped the weight of its merit. And so, weighing these things at once in the public assay, that is, comparing them with the acts and testimonies of the prophets and apostles, let us either hold them as whole and perfect and matching those, or reject them with all caution and care as imperfect, harmful, and not agreeing with their weight.”

Notes and citation

Summary: The devil deceived Abba John of Lycus into an excessive fast; every proposed action must be weighed against the acts and testimonies of the prophets and apostles.

  • Abba John of Lycus (Lycopolis), the famous seer of the Thebaid. The phrase “foul Ethiopian” reflects the demon-lore of the monastic sources; translated as written.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip (a for u); OCR slip (f for t); stray mark): In quo etiam -abbatem → In quo etiam abbatem; faetri → taetri; incongraenter → incongruenter.

Topics: Fasting

Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 1.21 (CSEL 13:32–33; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/1-14/#p-1-21). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-1-21) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).

1.22CSEL 13:33–35

Erit ergo hoc quadripertito quo diximus modo necessaria nobis ista discretio, id est ut primum materia nos auri ueri fucatiue non lateat, secundo ut has easdem cogitationes quae mentiuntur opera pietatis tamquam adulterina nomismata et paracharaxima reprobemus, utpote quae falsam imaginem regis non legitime signata contineant, uel illa, quae in auro pretiosissimo scripturarum uitioso et haeretico sensu non ueri regis, sed tyranni praeferunt uultum, similiter discernentes refutare possimus, siue illa, quorum pondus ac pretium aerugo uanitatis adrodens exagio seniorum non sinit adaequari, ut nomismata lenia atque damnosa minusque pensantia recusemus, ne in illud incidentes, quod obseruare tota uirtute praecepto domini commonemur, cunctis laborum nostrorum meritis stipendiisque fraudemur: nolite thesaurizare nobis thesauros in terra, ubi aerugo et tinea demolitur, et ubi fures effodiunt et furantur. quidquid enim contemplatione humanae gloriae fecerimus, in terra nos thesaurizare secundum domini sententiam nouerimus, et consequenter illud tamquam humi reconditum in terramque defossum uel diuersis daemoniis depopulandum uel edaci cenodoxiae aerugine consumendum uel ita superbiae tineis deuorandum, ut ad nullam recondentis utilitatem emolumentumque respiciat. omnes igitur cordis nostri recessus iugiter perscrutandi sunt et ascendentium in eos uestigia indagatione sagacissima retractanda, ne qua forte intellectualis ibidem bestia, uel leo uel draco, pertransiens perniciosa uestigia latenter inpresserit, quibus accessus etiam ceteris in adyta pectoris nostri per cogitationum neglegentiam praebeatur. et ita per singulas horas atque momenta terram cordis nostri euangelico aratro, hoc est iugi dominicae crucis recordatione sulcantes uel noxiarum ex nobis ferarum cubilia uel uirulentorum serpentium exterminare latibula poterimus.

“This discernment, then, will be necessary to us in the fourfold way we have described: first, that the material of true or counterfeit gold may not escape us; second, that we may reject as adulterated and counterfeit coins those thoughts which falsely claim to be works of piety, since they bear a false image of the king, unlawfully stamped; or that we may likewise detect and reject those which, on the most precious gold of the Scriptures, display through a faulty and heretical sense the face not of the true king but of a usurper; or those whose weight and value the rust of vanity has eaten away, so that it does not match the standard weight of the elders, so that we may refuse them as light, harmful, and underweight coins. Otherwise we may fall into what we are warned by the Lord's command to guard against with all our strength, and be cheated of all the merit and wages of our labors: ‘Do not lay up for yourselves treasures on earth, where rust and moth consume, and where thieves dig through and steal.’ For whatever we do with an eye to human glory we should know, according to the Lord's saying, we are laying up on earth; and consequently, as though hidden in the ground and buried in the earth, it will be plundered by various demons, or consumed by the devouring rust of vainglory, or so eaten by the moths of pride that it brings no use or profit to the one who stored it. All the recesses of our heart, then, must be searched continually, and the tracks of whatever enters them traced back with the shrewdest investigation, lest some intelligible beast, a lion or a dragon, passing through, secretly leave there its harmful tracks, by which access into the inner sanctuary of our breast may be given to others as well through the negligence of our thoughts. And so, hour by hour and moment by moment, ploughing the soil of our heart with the Gospel plough, that is, with constant remembrance of the Lord's cross, we shall be able to destroy the lairs of harmful beasts and the hiding places of poisonous serpents in us.”

Matt 6:19 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 91:13 (90:13 LXX) (echo, low confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Discernment tests thoughts in four ways, lest vainglory eat away our treasure; the heart must be searched constantly and ploughed with the remembrance of the cross.

  • Matt 6:19. The lion and dragon echo Ps 91:13 (90:13 LXX).

Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 1.22 (CSEL 13:33–35; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/1-14/#p-1-22). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-1-22) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).

1.23CSEL 13:35–37

Ad haec obstupefactos nos intuens senex et ad uerba narrationis suae inexplebili ardore succensos, pro admiratione desiderii nostri paulisper sermone suspenso rursus adiecit: quoniam nos, o filii, ad disputationem tam longam uestra sedulitas prouocauit et ignis quidam conlationi nostrae feruentiores sensus pro uestro desiderio subministrat, ut ex hoc etiam ipso manifeste contempler in ueritate uos perfectionis sitire doctrinam, uolo uobis adhuc super discretionis eximietate uel gratia, quae inter cunctas uirtutes arcem ac primatum tenet, pauca disserere excellentiamque eius et utilitatem non solum cotidianis exemplis, sed etiam antiquis patrum consultationibus ac sententiis adprobare. frequenter namque memini nonnullis huiusmodi sermonem cum gemitu lacrimisque poscentibus me quoque aliquid eis doctrinae conferre cupientem nullatenus potuisse et ita in me non solum sensus, uerum etiam ipsum eloquium defecisse, ut non inuenirem quemadmodum eos uel cum leui consolatione dimitterem. quibus indiciis euidenter agnoscitur domini gratiam pro merito ac desiderio audientium disputantibus adspirare sermonem. quem quia breuissimum istud quod superest noctis spatium non occurrit explere, indulgentes illud potius quieti corporeae, cui necesse est totum persolui, si id quod modicum est fuerit denegatum, plenum narrationis ordinem integro futuri diei seu noctis examini reseruemus. decet namque discretionis optimos consultores in hoc primum patefacere suae mentis industriam et utrum sint uel esse possint eius capaces hoc indicio ac patientia conprobare, ut de illa quae moderationis generatrix est uirtute tractantes nequaquam uitium quod ipsi contrarium est nimietatis incurrant, uim rationis ac naturae eius quam uerbis excolunt effectu atque opere uiolantes. in hoc ergo nobis discretionis bonum, de qua, quantum dominus dederit, adhuc indagare disponimus, primitus prosit, ut nos de ipsius excellentia et moderatione, quae prima eidem uirtus inesse cognoscitur, disserentes disputationis quoque uel temporis modum non permittat excedere. His itaque beatus Moyses conlationi nostrae dans finem adhuc nos auidos ac de suo ore pendentes degustare somnum paulisper hortatus est, isdem ipsis quibus insidebamus psiathiis admonens incubare, embrimiis pariter capiti nostro ceruicalium uice subpositis, quae crassioribus papyris in longos gracilesque fasciculos coactis sesquipedali interuallo pariter conligata nunc quidem humillimum sedile ad scabilli uicem fratribus in synaxi considentibus praestant, nunc uero subiecta ceruicibus dormientium praebent capiti non nimie durum, sed tractabile aptumque fulmentum. ad quos monachorum usus haec idcirco uel maxime oportuna habentur et congrua, quod non solum sint aliquatenus mollia paruoque et opere praeparentur et pretio, utpote passim papyro per ripas Nili fluminis emergente, sed etiam quod ad remouendum seu cum necesse fuerit admouendum habilis materiae leuisque naturae sint. atque ita praecepto senis tandem sumus ad degustationem somni onerosa quiete conpositi, tam digestae conlationis inflammati gaudio quam repromissae disputationis expectatione suspensi.

The old man, seeing us astonished and burning with insatiable ardor at the words of his discourse, paused for a little in wonder at our desire, and then added: “Since your earnestness, my sons, has drawn us into so long a discussion, and a kind of fire, answering your desire, supplies more fervent thoughts to our conference, so that from this very fact I clearly see that you truly thirst for the teaching of perfection, I want to say a little more to you about the excellence and grace of discernment, which holds the citadel and first place among all the virtues, and to prove its excellence and usefulness not only by everyday examples but also by the ancient questions and sayings of the fathers. For I remember that often, when some asked for such a discourse with groans and tears, and I wanted to give them some teaching, I could not do so at all; not only my thoughts but even my very speech failed me, so that I could not find how to send them away even with a little consolation. By these signs it is clearly recognized that the grace of the Lord breathes speech into those who discuss, according to the merit and desire of the hearers. But since the very short space of the night that remains is not enough to complete it, let us rather give it to bodily rest, which must be paid in full if even its small portion is denied, and keep the full course of the discourse for the whole of the coming day or night. For it befits the best counsellors on discernment first to show the diligence of their mind in this, and to prove by this sign and patience whether they are, or can be, capable of it, so that in treating of the virtue that is the mother of moderation they do not fall into the vice contrary to it, excess, violating in fact and deed the power of the principle and nature that they cultivate in words. Let the good of discernment, then, which we intend to investigate further as far as the Lord grants, first benefit us in this: that as we discuss its excellence and moderation, which is known to be its first virtue, it may not allow us to exceed due measure in discussion or in time.” With these words the blessed Moses brought our conference to an end. While we were still eager and hanging on his lips, he urged us to taste a little sleep, telling us to lie down on the very psiathia on which we had been sitting, with the embrimia placed under our heads instead of pillows. These are made of thicker papyrus gathered into long, thin bundles and tied together at intervals of a foot and a half; sometimes they serve as a very low seat, instead of a footstool, for the brothers sitting at the synaxis, and sometimes, placed under the necks of sleepers, they give the head a support not too hard but pliant and suitable. They are considered especially suitable and fitting for the monks' use, not only because they are somewhat soft and are made at little cost and labor, since papyrus grows everywhere along the banks of the Nile, but also because they are of a light and handy material for putting away or bringing out when needed. And so at the old man's bidding we at last settled down to taste sleep, in a burdensome quiet, as much inflamed with joy at the conference we had held as held in suspense by expectation of the discussion promised.

Notes and citation

Summary: Moses postpones his teaching on discernment to the next day, and the visitors sleep on reed mats with papyrus bundles for pillows.

  • psiathia: reed mats; embrimia: bundles of papyrus used as low seats or pillows; synaxis: the monks' gathering for common prayer.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip (a for s); OCR slip (a for u); OCR slip (i for l); stray marks; word split in the digital text): feraentiores → feruentiores; nullatenas → nullatenus; diacretionis → discretionis; quantum dominus ++ dederit → quantum dominus dederit; mode ratione → moderatione; ceruicaiium → ceruicalium.

Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 1.23 (CSEL 13:35–37; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/1-14/#p-1-23). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-1-23) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).

Chapter 2

2.1CSEL 13:37–40

Degustato itaque matutino sopore cum ortum lucis tandem nobis claruisse gaudentes repromissam narrationem reposcere coepissemus, beatus Moyses ita exorsus est: cum uideam uos tanto desiderii ardore flammatos, ut ne ipsum quidem paruissimum quietis momentum, quod spiritali conlationi subtrahens refectioni carnis malueram deputare, ad requiem credam uestri corporis profecisse, mihi quoque hunc uestrum consideranti feruorem sollicitudo maior incumbit. necesse est enim etiam me in persoluendo debito tanto maiorem deuotionis curam gerere, quanto uos id adtentius uideo postulare, secundum illam sententiam: si sederis cenare ad mensam potentis, sapienter intellege quae adponuntur tibi, et inmitte manum tuam, sciens quia talia te oportet praeparare. quamobrem de bono discretionis eiusque uirtute dicturi, in quam sermo nocturnae conlationis ingressus finem nostrae disputationi dedit, congruum credimus excellentiam eius patrum primo consignare sententiis, ut cum patuerit quid de illa senserint uel pronuntiauerint maiores nostri, tum prolatis tam antiquis quam recentibus ruinis et casibus diuersorum, qui pro eo quod minus eam fuerant adsecuti pernicioso deiecti sunt lapsu, in quantum possumus utilitates eius et commoda retractemus: quibus discussis quemadmodum expetere eam atque excolere debeamus efficacius instruamur, considerantes meriti eius et gratiae dignitatem. est enim non mediocris quaedam uirtus nec quae humana passim ualeat industria conprehendi, nisi diuina fuerit largitate conlata, siquidem inter nobilissima spiritus sancti dona hanc quoque ita legamus ab apostolo numerari: alii datur per spiritum sermo sapientiae, alii sermo scientiae secundum eundem spiritum, alii fides in eodem spiritu, alii gratia sanitatum in uno spiritu, et post pauca: alii discretio spirituum. deinde conpleto omni catalogo spiritalium charismatum subdit: omnia autem haec operatur unus atque idem spiritus, diuidens unicuique prout uult. uidetis ergo non terrenum nec paruum esse discretionis munus, sed diuinae gratiae maximum praemium. quam nisi monachus omni intentione fuerit adsecutus et ascendentium in sese spirituum discretionem certa ratione possederit, necesse est eum uelut in nocte caeca taetrisque tenebris oberrantem non solum perniciosis foueis ac praeruptis incidere, sed etiam in planis ac directis frequenter offendere.

So, having tasted the morning's sleep, when we saw with joy that daylight had at last dawned for us and began to ask again for the promised discourse, the blessed Moses began thus: “Since I see you so inflamed with the ardor of desire that I do not believe even that very short moment of rest, which I had preferred to take from our spiritual conference and give to the refreshment of the flesh, has served for the rest of your bodies, a greater anxiety also weighs on me as I consider this fervor of yours. For I too must take all the more care and devotion in paying my debt, the more earnestly I see you demand it, according to the saying: ‘If you sit down to dine at the table of a ruler, consider wisely what is set before you, and put out your hand, knowing that you must prepare such things.’ Therefore, since we are to speak about the good of discernment and its power, on which our night conference had entered when it ended our discussion, we think it fitting first to establish its excellence by the sayings of the fathers. Then, when it has become clear what our elders thought and declared about it, we shall set out the ancient and recent falls and misfortunes of various men who were cast down in ruinous collapse because they had failed to attain it, and review its benefits and advantages as far as we can. When these have been discussed, we shall be more effectively taught how we ought to seek and cultivate it, considering the dignity of its merit and grace. For it is no ordinary virtue, nor one that human effort can grasp at will, unless it is bestowed by divine generosity. For we read that the apostle counts it among the noblest gifts of the Holy Spirit: ‘To one is given through the Spirit the word of wisdom, to another the word of knowledge according to the same Spirit, to another faith in the same Spirit, to another the grace of healings in the one Spirit’; and a little later, ‘to another discernment of spirits.’ Then, having completed the whole catalogue of spiritual gifts, he adds: ‘But all these are worked by one and the same Spirit, dividing to each one as he will.’ You see, then, that the gift of discernment is not earthly or small, but the greatest prize of divine grace. Unless a monk has pursued it with all his intention and possesses by sure reckoning the discernment of the spirits that rise up in him, he must, like one who runs in a blind night and thick darkness, not only fall into dangerous pits and precipices, but also frequently stumble even on level and straight ground.”

Prov 23:1 (quotation, high confidence) · Prov 23:2 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 12:8 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 12:9 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 12:10 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 12:11 (quotation, high confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: Moses begins his teaching on discernment, a gift of the Holy Spirit without which a monk stumbles as in the dark.

  • Prov 23:1–2 (Cassian's Latin, following the LXX); 1 Cor 12:8–11.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR slip; OCR slip (e for c); OCR slip and a stray letter; OCR slips; two words joined): ftammatoB → flammatos; perspiritum → per spiritum; suMit → subdit; nee paruum esse discrationis → nec paruum esse discretionis; necesse eat eum → necesse est eum; obeorrntem → oberrantem; foueis ae praeruptis → foueis ac praeruptis; planis ae directis frequenter offendere. J → planis ac directis frequenter offendere..

Cite (SBL): Cassian, Conf. 2.1 (CSEL 13:37–40; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/cassian-conferences/1-14/#p-2-1). (abbreviation not yet checked)

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-cassian-conferences-2-1) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude from Petschenig's Latin text (CSEL 13, 1886); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 11 translation (Gibson, 1894), which omits Conference 22 (checked against the Latin only).