To the Nations 1.19

Summary: Christian courage rests on hope of resurrection and judgment, beliefs that pagans mock though their own poets and philosophers teach the return of souls and a judgment after death.

Show

Latin text · Oehler 1:345–346

Hucusque, opinor, horrenda obstinationum Christianarum. Quae si vobiscum communicamus, superest deridenda personarum conferamus. Quanquam de persuasionibus omnis obstinatio nostra praestruitur; mortuorum enim praesumimus resurrectionem. Spes resurrectionis fastidium est mortis. Ridete igitur quantumlibet stupidissimas mentes quae moriuntur ut vivant, sed quo facilius rideatis et resolutius decachinnetis, arrepta spongia vel interim lingua delete litteras interim vestras, quae similiter asseverant animas in corpora redituras. Attamen quanto acceptabilior nostra praesumptio est, quae in eadem corpora redituras defendit? vobis autem quanto vanius traditum est hominis spiritum in cane vel mulo aut pavone rediturum? Item iudicium annuntiamus a deo pro cuiusque meritis post interitum destinatum. Id vos Minoi et Rhadamantho adscribitis, iustiore interim Aristide recusato. Eo iudicio iniquos aeterno igni, pios et insontes amoeno in loco dicimus perpetuitatem transacturos. Apud vos quoque Pyriphlegethontis et Elysii non alias condicio disponitur. Nec mythici ac poetici soli talia canunt, sed et philosophi de animarum reciprocatione et iudicii distributione confirmant.

English · Claude translation

So far, I think, the dreadful charges of Christian obstinacy. If we share these with you, it remains for us to compare the matters in which we are ridiculed. And yet all our obstinacy is built on convictions; for we look forward to the resurrection of the dead. The hope of resurrection is contempt of death. Laugh, then, as much as you like at these most stupid minds that die in order to live; but that you may laugh more easily and guffaw more freely, take a sponge, or meanwhile your tongue, and wipe out for the moment your own writings, which likewise assert that souls will return into bodies. And yet how much more acceptable is our belief, which maintains that they will return into the same bodies! And how much vainer is your tradition that a man's spirit will return in a dog or a mule or a peacock! Likewise we announce a judgment appointed by God after death according to each one's deserts. You ascribe this to Minos and Rhadamanthus, while meanwhile rejecting the more just Aristides. By that judgment, we say, the wicked will pass eternity in eternal fire, and the pious and innocent in a delightful place. With you too the state of Pyriphlegethon and of Elysium is arranged in no other way. Nor do the mythmakers and poets alone sing such things; the philosophers too affirm the return of souls and the allotment of judgment.

About this passage

Source
Oehler 1:345–346 · Franz Oehler, ed., Quinti Septimii Florentis Tertulliani quae supersunt omnia, vol. 1 (Leipzig: T. O. Weigel, 1853), 305–395 · Latin text: Franz Oehler (Oehler 1), digitized by the Perseus Digital Library (canonical-latinLit), CC BY-SA 4.0
Text
As printed in Oehler 1. Manuscript variants and the editor's apparatus are not reproduced; no textual problem is noted in this passage.
Translation
Claude translation (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-27 · Translated by Claude from the Latin text of Oehler 1; made independently of existing English translations.
Compare
Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 3 (1885) (an older public-domain English translation, whole volume at CCEL; checked against ours only after ours was made)
Scripture
Topics
Eschatology

Notes

Translation notes

  • The peacock alludes to Ennius's dream in which Homer's soul had passed into a peacock. Pyriphlegethon (the river of fire) and Elysium are the pagan places of punishment and bliss.

Cite this passage

Tertullian, Nat. 1.19 (trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/tertullian-nationes/1/19/).

Plain text
Tertullian, Nat. 1.19 (trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/tertullian-nationes/1/19/).

Download citation:BibTeX ·RIS (Zotero, EndNote)

Whole work:BibTeX ·RIS ·Markdown text

Report an error in this passage