Apology 48–50

Latin text: Mayor-Souter 1917 (after Oehler) (Latin text: Franz Oehler's text as printed by John E. B. Mayor and Alexander Souter (Cambridge University Press, 1917); the commentary and English translation in that book are not reproduced. OCR corrected mechanically.).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0). Compare: Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 3 (1885).

Show

Chapter 48

48Mayor-Souter, 134–140

Age iam, si qui philosophus adfirmet, ut ait Laberius de sententia Pythagorae, hominem fieri ex mulo, colubram ex muliere, et in eam opinionem omnia argumenta eloquii uirtute distorserit, nonne consensum mouebit et fidem infiget etiam ab animalibus abstinendi propterea? Persuasum quis habeat, ne forte bubulam de aliquo proauo suo obsonet? At enim Christianus si de homine hominem ipsumque de Gaio Gaium reducem repromittat, lapidibus magis, nec saltim coetibus a populo exigetur. Si quaecunque ratio praeest animarum humanarum reciprocandarum in corpora, cur non in eandem substantiam redeant, cum hoc sit restitui, id esse quod fuerat? Iam non ipsae sunt quae fuerant, quia non potuerunt esse quod non erant, nisi desinant esse quod fuerant. Multis etiam locis ex otio opus erit, si uelimus ad hanc partem lasciuire, quis in quam bestiam reformari uideretur. Sed de nostra magis defensione, qui proponimus multo utique dignius credi hominem ex homine rediturum, quemlibet pro quolibet, dum hominem, ut eadem qualitas animae in eandem restauraretur conditionem, etsi non effigiem. Certe quia ratio restitutionis destinatio iudicii est, necessario idem ipse qui fuerat exhibebitur, ut boni seu contrarii meriti iudicium a deo referat. Ideoque repraesentabuntur et corpora, quia neque pati quicquam potest anima sola sine materia stabili, id est carne, et quod omnino de iudicio dei pati debent animae, non sine carne meruerunt intra quam omnia egerunt. Sed quomodo, inquis, dissoluta materia exhiberi potest? Considera temetipsum, o homo, et fidem rei inuenies. Recogita quid fueris antequam esses. Utique nihil. Meminisses enim, si quid fuisses. Qui ergo nihil fueras priusquam esses, idem nihil factus cum esse desieris, cur non possis rursus esse de nihilo eiusdem ipsius auctoris uoluntate qui te uoluit esse de nihilo? Quid noui tibi eueniet? Qui non eras, factus es; cum iterum non eris, fies. Redde si potes rationem qua factus es, et tunc require qua fies. Et tamen facilius utique fies quod fuisti aliquando, quia aeque non difficile factus es quod nunquam fuisti aliquando. Dubitabitur, credo, de dei uiribus, qui tantum corpus hoc mundi de eo quod non fuerat non minus quam de morte uacationis et inanitatis inposuit, animatum spiritu omnium animarum animatore, signatum et ipsum humanae resurrectionis exemplum in testimonium uobis. Lux cotidie interfecta resplendet et tenebrae pari uice decedendo succedunt, sidera defuncta uiuescunt, tempora ubi finiuntur incipiunt, fructus consummantur et redeunt, certe semina non nisi corrupta et dissoluta fecundius surgunt, omnia pereundo seruantur, omnia de interitu reformantur. Tu homo, tantum nomen, si intellegas te uel de titulo Pythiae discens, dominus omnium morientium et resurgentium, ad hoc morieris, ut pereas? Ubicumque resolutus fueris, quaecunque te materia destruxerit, hauserit, aboleuerit, in nihilum prodegerit, reddet te. Eius est nihilum ipsum cuius et totum. Ergo, inquitis, semper moriendum erit et semper resurgendum? Si ita rerum dominus destinasset, ingratis experireris conditionis tuae legem. At nunc non aliter destinauit quam praedicauit. Quae ratio uniuersitatem ex diuersitate conposuit, ut omnia aemulis substantiis sub unitate constarent ex uacuo et solido, ex animali et inanimali, ex conprehensibili et inconprehensibili, ex luce et tenebris, ex ipsa uita et morte: eadem aeuum quoque ita destinata et distincta condicione conseruit, ut prima haec pars, ab exordio rerum quam incolimus, temporali aetate ad finem defluat, sequens uero, quam expectamus, in infinitam aeternitatem propagetur. Cum ergo finis et limes, medius qui interhiat, adfuerit, ut etiam ipsius mundi species transferatur aeque temporalis, quae illi dispositioni aeternitatis aulaei uice oppansa est, tunc restituetur omne humanum genus ad expungendum quod in isto aeuo boni seu mali meruit, et exinde pendendum in immensam aeternitatis perpetuitatem. Ideoque nec mors iam, nec rursus ac rursus resurrectio, sed erimus idem qui nunc, nec alii post, dei quidem cultores apud deum semper, superinduti substantia propria aeternitatis: profani uero, et qui non integre ad deum, in poena aeque iugis ignis, habentes ex ipsa natura eius diuinam scilicet subministrationem incorruptibilitatis. Nouerunt et philosophi diuersitatem arcani et publici ignis. Ita longe alius est qui usui humano, alius qui iudicio dei apparet, siue de caelo fulmina stringens, siue de terra per uertices montium eructans; non enim absumit quod exurit, sed dum erogat, reparat. Adeo manent montes semper ardentes, et qui de caelo tangitur, saluus est, ut nullo iam igni decinerescat. Et hoc erit testimonium ignis aeterni, hoc exemplum iugis iudicii poenam nutrientis. Montes uruntur et durant. Quid nocentes et dei hostes?

Come now, if some philosopher were to affirm, as Laberius says following the opinion of Pythagoras, that a man is made from a mule and a snake from a woman, and were to twist every argument to that opinion by the power of his eloquence, would he not win assent and fix belief, even to the point of abstaining from animals on that account? Would anyone be persuaded of it, lest by chance he dine on beef from some great-grandfather of his? But if a Christian promises that a man will return from a man, and Gaius himself from Gaius, he will be driven out by the people with stones rather than be granted even a hearing. If any reasoning governs the return of human souls into bodies, why should they not return into the same substance, since this is to be restored, to be what one had been? Otherwise they are no longer the same as they had been, because they could not be what they were not unless they ceased to be what they had been. We would also need much leisure in many places if we wished to make sport of this subject: who seemed to be re-formed into which beast. But rather for our own defense: we propose that it is much more worthy of belief that a man will return from a man, any given man as himself, so long as a man, so that the same quality of soul may be restored to the same condition, even if not to the same appearance. Certainly, since the reason for restoration is the appointment of judgment, the very same one who had been will necessarily be presented, to receive from God the judgment of good or contrary desert. And therefore bodies too will be brought back, both because the soul alone can suffer nothing without stable matter, that is, flesh, and because what souls must suffer at all from God's judgment they did not deserve without the flesh, within which they did everything. “But how,” you say, “can matter that has been dissolved be presented?” Consider yourself, O man, and you will find belief in the thing. Recall what you were before you were. Nothing, surely; for you would remember if you had been anything. You, then, who were nothing before you were, and will become the same nothing when you cease to be, why could you not be again from nothing by the will of the same author who willed you to be from nothing? What new thing will happen to you? You who were not were made; when again you are not, you will be made. Give, if you can, the reason by which you were made, and then ask the reason by which you will be made. And yet you will surely be made more easily what you once were, since you were made with equal ease what you never were before. There will be doubt, I suppose, about the powers of God, who set up this great body of the world from what had not been, no less than from a death of emptiness and void, animated by the Spirit who animates all souls, itself stamped as an example of human resurrection, as a testimony to you. Light, slain daily, shines again, and darkness, by equal turns, departs and comes after; the stars that have died come to life again; the seasons begin where they end; fruits are consumed and come back; seeds certainly do not rise more fruitfully unless corrupted and dissolved; all things are preserved by perishing, all are re-formed from destruction. Will you, O man, so great a name, if you understand yourself, learning it even from the inscription of the Pythian, lord of all things that die and rise, die for this, that you may perish? Wherever you have been dissolved, whatever matter has destroyed you, swallowed you, abolished you, squandered you into nothing, it will give you back. Nothingness itself belongs to him to whom the whole belongs. “So,” you say, “we shall always have to die and always rise again?” If the Lord of things had so appointed, you would experience the law of your condition against your will. But in fact he has appointed nothing other than he has proclaimed. The reason that composed the universe from diversity, so that all things should stand together in unity from rival substances, from void and solid, from animate and inanimate, from comprehensible and incomprehensible, from light and darkness, from life itself and death, that same reason has also joined the ages together by a condition so appointed and distinguished that this first part, which we inhabit from the beginning of things, flows down through a temporal age to an end, while the following one, which we await, extends into infinite eternity. When, therefore, the end and the boundary that gapes between them has come, so that even the form of the world itself, equally temporal, which is spread like a curtain before that dispensation of eternity, is changed, then the whole human race will be restored to settle the account of what it has deserved in this age, good or evil, and from then on to be paid out into the boundless perpetuity of eternity. And so there will be no more death, nor resurrection again and again, but we shall be the same as now, and not others afterward: the worshipers of God always with God, clothed over with the proper substance of eternity; but the profane, and those not wholly given to God, in the punishment of fire equally unceasing, having from its very nature, of course, a divine supply of incorruptibility. The philosophers too know the difference between secret and common fire. So the fire that serves human use is very different from the one that appears at God's judgment, whether striking thunderbolts from heaven or belching from the earth through the peaks of mountains; for it does not consume what it burns, but restores while it spends. So the mountains remain always burning, and one who is struck from heaven is safe, so that he is no longer reduced to ashes by any fire. And this will be a testimony to eternal fire, an example of the unceasing judgment that keeps its punishment alive. The mountains burn and endure. What of the guilty and the enemies of God?

1 Cor 15:36 (allusion, medium confidence) · 2 Cor 5:4 (allusion, medium confidence) · 1 Cor 7:31 (allusion, medium confidence) · Matt 25:46 (allusion, medium confidence)

Notes and citation

Summary: The resurrection of the same person, body and soul, for judgment is more credible than transmigration; God who made man from nothing can remake him, and the world is full of images of resurrection.

  • Laberius, a writer of mimes, on Pythagorean transmigration.
  • “Rather than be granted even a hearing”: coetibus is doubtful in the text; translated by sense.
  • “The inscription of the Pythian”: the Delphic maxim “Know yourself.”

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR dropped letter; OCR garble; OCR m for in; OCR ri for n; OCR split word; doubled stop): animarum human arum → animarum humanarum; conditioner^ etsi → conditionem, etsi; omnia egerunt.. → omnia egerunt.; cum terum non eris → cum iterum non eris; respleridet → resplendet; temporaK → temporali; infmitam → infinitam; non enifn absuinit → non enim absumit.

Extrabiblical texts: Laberius (Decimus Laberius (fragments); allusion)

Topics: Eschatology

Cite (SBL): Tertullian, Apol. 48 (Mayor-Souter, 134–140; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/tertullian-apologeticum/48/#p-48).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-tertullian-apologeticum-48) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Mayor and Souter (Cambridge, 1917; Oehler's text), from the OCR of the printed edition with slips corrected as logged; each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation in ANF 3 (1885).

Chapter 49

49Mayor-Souter, 140–142

Hae sunt quae in nobis solis praesumptiones uocantur, in philosophis et poetis summae scientiae et insignia ingenia. Illi prudentes, nos inepti; illi honorandi, nos inridendi, immo eo amplius et puniendi. Falsa nunc sint quae tuentur et merito praesumptio, attamen necessaria; inepta, attamen utilia; siquidem meliores fieri coguntur qui eis credunt, metu aeterni supplicii et spe aeterni refrigerii. Itaque non expedit falsa dici nec inepta haberi quae expedit uera praesumi. Nullo titulo damnari licet omnino quae prosunt. In uobis itaque praesumptio est haec ipsa quae damnat utilia. Proinde nec inepta esse possunt; certe etsi falsa et inepta, nulli tamen noxia. Nam et multis aliis similia quibus nullas poenas inrogatis, uanis et fabulosis, inaccusatis et inpunitis, ut innoxiis. Sed in eiusmodi enim, si utique, inrisui iudicandum est, non gladiis et ignibus et crucibus et bestiis, de qua iniquitate saeuitiae non modo caecum hoc uulgus exsultat et insultat, sed et quidam uestrum, quibus fauor uulgi de iniquitate captatur, gloriantur. Quasi non totum quod in nos potestis nostrum sit arbitrium. Certe, si uelim, Christianus sum. Tunc ergo me damnabis, si damnari uelim; cum uero quod in me potes, nisi uelim, non potes, iam meae uoluntatis est quod potes, non tuae potestatis. Proinde et uulgus uane de nostra uexatione gaudet. Proinde enim nostrum est gaudium, quod sibi uindicat, qui malumus damnari quam a deo excidere: contra illi, qui nos oderunt, dolere, non gaudere debebant, consecutis nobis quod elegimus.

These are the things that in us alone are called presumptions, but in philosophers and poets the highest knowledge and remarkable genius. They are wise, we foolish; they are to be honored, we to be laughed at, indeed, more than that, to be punished. Suppose now that what we defend is false and rightly called presumption: yet it is necessary; foolish, yet useful; since those who believe it are compelled to become better, by fear of eternal punishment and hope of eternal refreshment. So it is not expedient that things should be called false or held foolish which it is expedient to presume true. By no title is it lawful to condemn at all what is beneficial. In you, then, is this very presumption, which condemns what is useful. So they cannot be foolish either; certainly, even if false and foolish, yet harmful to no one. For they are like many other things on which you inflict no penalties, vain and fabulous, unaccused and unpunished as harmless. But in such matters, if at all, the judgment is ridicule, not swords and fires and crosses and beasts; at the injustice of this cruelty not only does this blind mob exult and insult, but some of you too boast, who court the favor of the mob by injustice. As if all that you can do against us were not at our own choice! Certainly I am a Christian if I will. So you will condemn me only if I will to be condemned; and since what you can do against me you cannot do unless I will, what you can do is a matter of my will, not of your power. So too the mob rejoices in vain over our harassment. For the joy it claims for itself is ours, since we prefer to be condemned rather than to fall away from God; on the contrary, those who hate us ought to grieve, not rejoice, since we have obtained what we chose.

Notes and citation

Summary: Even if Christian beliefs were false, they make people better and harm no one, so they deserve at most ridicule, not death; and Christians suffer only by their own choice.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR split word): Quasi non to tum → Quasi non totum.

Topics: Persecution, Martyrdom

Cite (SBL): Tertullian, Apol. 49 (Mayor-Souter, 140–142; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/tertullian-apologeticum/48/#p-49).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-tertullian-apologeticum-49) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Mayor and Souter (Cambridge, 1917; Oehler's text), from the OCR of the printed edition with slips corrected as logged; each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation in ANF 3 (1885).

Chapter 50

50Mayor-Souter, 142–146

Ergo, inquitis, cur querimini quod uos insequamur, si pati uultis, cum diligere debeatis per quos patimini quod uultis? Plane uolumus pati, uerum eo more, quo et bellum miles. Nemo quidem libens patitur, cum et trepidare et periclitari sit necesse. Tamen et proeliatur omnibus uiribus, et uincens in proelio gaudet qui de proelio querebatur, quia et gloriam consequitur et praedam. Proelium est nobis quod prouocamur ad tribunalia, ut illic sub discrimine capitis pro ueritate certemus. Victoria est autem pro quo certaueris obtinere. Ea uictoria habet et gloriam placendi deo et praedam uiuendi in aeternum. Sed obducimur. Certe cum obtinuimus. Ergo uicimus, cum occidimur, denique euadimus, cum obducimur. Licet nunc sarmenticios et semaxios appelletis, quia ad stipitem dimidii axis reuincti sarmentorum ambitu exurimur. Hic est habitus uictoriae nostrae, haec palmata uestis, tali curru triumphamus. Merito itaque uictis non placemus; propterea enim desperati et perditi existimamur. Sed haec desperatio et perditio penes uos in causa gloriae et famae uexillum uirtutis extollunt. Mucius dexteram suam libens in ara reliquit: o sublimitas animi! Empedocles totum sese Catanensium Aetnaeis incendiis donauit: o uigor mentis! Aliqua Carthaginis conditrix rogo se secundum matrimonium dedit: o praeconium castitatis! Regulus, ne unus pro multis hostibus uiueret, toto corpore cruces patitur: o uirum fortem et in captiuitate uictorem! Anaxarchus, cum in exitum tisanae pilo contunderetur: Tunde, tunde, aiebat, Anaxarchi follem, Anaxarchum enim non tundis: o philosophi magnanimitatem, qui de tali exitu suo etiam iocabatur! Omitto eos qui cum gladio proprio uel alio genere mortis mitiore de laude pepigerunt. Ecce enim et tormentorum certamina coronantur a uobis. Attica meretrix carnifice iam fatigato postremo linguam suam comesam in faciem tyranni saeuientis exspuit, ut exspueret et uocem, ne coniuratos confiteri posset, si etiam uicta uoluisset. Zeno Eleates consultus a Dionysio, quidnam philosophia praestaret, cum respondisset contemptum mortis, inpassibilis flagellis tyranni obiectus sententiam suam ad mortem usque signabat. Certe Laconum flagella sub oculis etiam hortantium propinquorum acerbata tantum honorem tolerantiae domui conferunt quantum sanguinis fuderint. gloriam licitam, quia humanam, cui nec praesumptio perdita nec persuasio desperata reputatur in contemptu mortis et atrocitatis omnimodae, cui tantum pro patria, pro imperio, pro amicitia pati permissum est quantum pro deo non licet! Et tamen illis omnibus et statuas defunditis, et imagines inscribitis, et titulos inciditis in aeternitatem. Quantum de monumentis potestis scilicet, praestatis et ipsi quodammodo mortuis resurrectionem. Hanc qui ueram a deo sperat, si pro deo patiatur, insanus est. Sed hoc agite, boni praesides, meliores multo apud populum si illis Christianos immolaueritis, cruciate, torquete, damnate, atterite nos: probatio est enim innocentiae nostrae iniquitas uestra. Ideo nos haec pati deus patitur. Nam et proxime ad lenonem damnando Christianam potius quam ad leonem confessi estis labem pudicitiae apud nos atrociorem omni poena et omni morte reputari. Nec quicquam tamen proficit exquisitior quaeque crudelitas uestra; inlecebra est magis sectae. Plures efficimur quotiens metimur a uobis; semen est sanguis Christianorum. Multi apud uos ad tolerantiam doloris et mortis hortantur, ut Cicero in Tusculanis, ut Seneca in Fortuitis, ut Diogenes, ut Pyrrhon, ut Callinicus. Nec tamen tantos inueniunt uerba discipulos quantos Christiani factis docendo. Illa ipsa obstinatio, quam exprobratis, magistra est. Quis enim non contemplatione eius concutitur ad requirendum quid intus in re sit? quis non, ubi requisiuit, accedit? ubi accessit, pati exoptat, ut totam dei gratiam redimat, ut omnem ueniam ab eo compensatione sanguinis sui expediat? Omnia enim huic operi delicta donantur. Inde est, quod ibidem sententiis uestris gratias agimus. Ut est aemulatio diuinae rei et humanae, cum damnamur a uobis, a deo absoluimur.

“Then why,” you say, “do you complain that we persecute you, if you want to suffer, when you ought to love those through whom you suffer what you want?” Plainly we want to suffer, but in the way a soldier wants war. No one indeed suffers willingly, since he must fear and face danger. Yet he fights with all his strength, and, winning in battle, he rejoices who complained of battle, because he gains both glory and booty. It is our battle that we are summoned to the tribunals, to contend there for the truth at the risk of our lives. And victory is to obtain that for which you have contended. That victory has both the glory of pleasing God and the booty of living forever. “But we are executed.” Certainly, when we have won. So we have conquered when we are killed; in short, we escape when we are executed. Call us now, if you like, faggot-men and half-axle men, because we are burned, bound to a stake half an axle long, surrounded by bundles of brushwood. This is the dress of our victory, this our palm-embroidered robe; in such a chariot we triumph. Rightly, then, we do not please the conquered; for that is why we are thought desperate and lost. But this desperation and lostness among you raise the banner of virtue in the cause of glory and fame. Mucius willingly left his right hand on the altar: O loftiness of soul! Empedocles gave his whole self to the fires of Aetna at Catana: O vigor of mind! A certain foundress of Carthage gave herself to the pyre rather than to a second marriage: O glorious proclamation of chastity! Regulus, lest he alone should live in exchange for many enemies, suffered crosses over his whole body: O brave man, a conqueror even in captivity! Anaxarchus, as he was being pounded to death with a pestle like barley, said, “Pound, pound the bag of Anaxarchus; for Anaxarchus you are not pounding”: O magnanimity of the philosopher, who even joked about such a death! I pass over those who have bargained for praise with their own sword or with some gentler kind of death. For see, even contests of torture are crowned by you. An Athenian courtesan, when the executioner was already tired, at last spat her bitten-off tongue into the face of the raging tyrant, so as to spit out her voice too, lest she be able to betray the conspirators even if, overcome, she should wish to. Zeno of Elea, asked by Dionysius what philosophy provided, answered, contempt of death; and, exposed unflinching to the tyrant's scourges, he sealed his opinion even to death. Certainly the scourgings of the Spartans, made harsher under the eyes of their relatives, who even urged them on, confer as much honor of endurance on their house as they have shed blood. O glory that is lawful because it is human, to which neither lost presumption nor desperate conviction is imputed in its contempt of death and of every kind of atrocity, which is permitted to suffer as much for fatherland, for empire, for friendship, as is not lawful for God! And yet for all these you cast statues, inscribe images, and cut inscriptions for eternity. As far as you can by monuments, you yourselves grant the dead a kind of resurrection. One who hopes for the true resurrection from God is insane if he suffers for God! But go on, good governors; you will be much better in the people's eyes if you sacrifice Christians to them: crucify, torture, condemn, grind us down; for your injustice is the proof of our innocence. That is why God allows us to suffer these things. For recently, by condemning a Christian woman to the pimp rather than to the lion, you confessed that among us a stain on chastity is reckoned more terrible than any punishment and any death. Yet none of your more refined cruelty accomplishes anything; it is rather an enticement to our school. We become more numerous every time we are mown down by you: the blood of Christians is seed. Many among you urge endurance of pain and death, like Cicero in the Tusculans, Seneca in the Chances, Diogenes, Pyrrho, Callinicus. Yet their words do not find as many disciples as Christians do by teaching with deeds. That very obstinacy that you reproach is a teacher. For who, contemplating it, is not shaken to inquire what is really inside the matter? who, when he has inquired, does not come over? and when he has come over, does not long to suffer, so that he may purchase the whole grace of God, so that he may obtain from him full pardon at the price of his blood? For all sins are forgiven to this deed. That is why we give thanks for your sentences on the spot. As there is a rivalry between divine and human things, when we are condemned by you, we are acquitted by God.

Notes and citation

Summary: Christians suffer as soldiers fight, to win; the pagans praise heroes who died for glory but condemn Christians who die for God, yet every persecution makes more Christians: “the blood of Christians is seed.”

  • “Faggot-men and half-axle men” (sarmenticii, semaxii): mocking names for Christians burned at the stake.
  • The foundress of Carthage is Dido, who in one tradition chose the pyre rather than remarry.
  • “All sins are forgiven to this deed”: martyrdom as a second baptism, a view Tertullian states elsewhere (On Baptism 16).
  • Cicero, Tusculan Disputations 2; Seneca's lost work On Chances.

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (OCR e for c; OCR i for l; OCR i- for r; OCR m for ffi; OCR n for fi; OCR rn for m; OCR split word): toto coi-pore → toto corpore; ioeabatur → iocabatur; carnince → carnifice; consul tus → consultus; pro arnicitia → pro amicitia; emcimur → efficimur; Ilia ipsa obstinatio → Illa ipsa obstinatio; ut to tam dei → ut totam dei; et hurnanae → et humanae.

Extrabiblical texts: Cicero, Tusc. 2 (Cicero; allusion); Seneca (Seneca; allusion); Empedocles (Empedocles (fragments); allusion)

Topics: Martyrdom, Persecution, Divorce and remarriage

Cite (SBL): Tertullian, Apol. 50 (Mayor-Souter, 142–146; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/tertullian-apologeticum/48/#p-50).

BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-tertullian-apologeticum-50) · Report an error

Translation: Translated by Claude (Opus) from the Latin of Mayor and Souter (Cambridge, 1917; Oehler's text), from the OCR of the printed edition with slips corrected as logged; each batch compared afterwards with the public-domain translation in ANF 3 (1885).