Dion, or On Living according to His Own Principles
Dio · Δίων ἢ περὶ τῆς κατ᾽ αὐτὸν διαγωγῆς
Read the whole work on one page
Contents
Reading pages: 239–271 · 272–304 · 305–310
- 239Synesius begins from Philostratus, who in the Lives of the Sophists classed Dio among philosophers with a sophist's eloquence.
- 240Dio was a sophist in style but not in life; he changed in the opposite direction from Aristocles, a Peripatetic who became a pleasure-loving sophist.
- 241Dio, unlike Aristocles, turned from sophist to philosopher; Philostratus should have described his double career instead of grouping him with Carneades.
- 242Carneades and the like would have refused the name of sophist; Dio really lived two lives and argued against himself.
- 243Philostratus contradicts himself, calling Dio a philosopher mistaken for a sophist and yet excusing his trivial speeches as a sophist's.
- 244Before his conversion Dio sincerely attacked philosophers, including Musonius; after it his strong nature showed itself in philosophy.
- 245After his conversion Dio treated even rhetorical themes as a statesman; he neglected technical philosophy but excelled in moral exhortation.
- 246Dio's speeches should be sorted into those before and after his exile, so that his attacks on and praises of the philosophers are not confused.
- 247Philostratus wrongly treats Dio's Euboean Speech, a serious portrait of the happy life, as being of a piece with his trivial praise of a parrot.
- 248The Euboean Speech humbles the rich and comforts the poor; it rightly follows Dio's fourth speech on kingship, which promised a portrait of the good life.
- 249Apart from the heroic lives of Diogenes and Socrates, the Euboean hunter's simple, just life is the happy life open to all; Dio also praised the Essenes.
- 250Dio's style differs between his sophistic showpieces, which preen like a peacock, and the plain, purposeful works of his later life.
- 251Dio's mature style is ancient, weighty and natural, as in his civic speeches, unlike his showpieces and his early speech against the philosophers.
- 252Dio's speech against the philosophers was as brilliant as Aristophanes' Clouds, whose fluency Synesius illustrates with a quotation.
- 253Even at his most showy, Dio stayed close to the ancient rhetoric; in most of his works he belongs with the sober classical orators.
- 254Dio's style is restrained and his arguments dense and inventive; his hand is recognizable in both his rhetorical and his political works.
- 255Synesius writes this assessment of Dio for the son whose birth had just been foretold, intending Dio's political works as a bridge to philosophy.
- 256After weighty philosophy one should relax by stages through lighter literature and then climb back to seriousness.
- 257The philosopher should be cultured and widely read, a true Greek; curiosity is the prelude to philosophy, which judges all the arts.
- 258The Muses form one chorus and cannot be separated; specialists master only one, but philosophy presides over all.
- 259Like Apollo leading the Muses and singing alone, the philosopher unites all learning, communing with God and also speaking to men.
- 260Those who scorn rhetoric are simply incapable of it; a beautiful soul expresses itself outwardly, and eloquence even helps to guard sacred truths.
- 261An unlettered sage must either be silent or blurt out secrets; Proteus, by contrast, showed visitors a dazzling show.
- 262Like Proteus's shows or Ixion's cloud, eloquent discourse satisfies the many and guards the inner truth, which God opens to the worthy.
- 263Proteus's transformations hid lessons in natural philosophy; the philosopher, being human, needs literature both to reach people and to rest from contemplation.
- 264Literature gives the mind a pure resting-place close to contemplation; without it, nature seeks lower pleasures.
- 265Those who claim to need no rest from contemplation pretend to be gods; Synesius turns to barbarian ascetics who renounce society for contemplation.
- 266The ascetics live apart with sacred songs and rites, abstaining like Homer's gods from bread and wine, yet nature draws even them back from contemplation.
- 267Few even of the ascetics reach contemplation, and none stays there; they know they are men with lower lives to keep in check.
- 268The ascetics weave baskets to occupy their lower nature when they cannot contemplate, guarding against idleness.
- 269Since no human can always contemplate, Synesius chooses literature as the purest middle pleasure between divine austerity and bodily indulgence.
- 270The Greek descends from contemplation only as far as science and literature, which are akin to mind and train the soul's eye for higher vision.
- 271Literary work engages the mind; the ascetics' way, though some reach the goal, is a leap without stages or reason.
- 272Like initiates who undergo rather than learn, the ascetics leap up and fall down, skipping reason; the Greek philosopher climbs by a ladder.
- 273The gradual way lets many advance; the leap succeeds only for rare, self-moved minds like the Egyptian king Amous.
- 274Greek education helps ordinary souls rise, while the ascetic leap suits only souls rarer than the phoenix; most who attempt it toil in vain.
- 275Most who join the ascetic life lack mind, the only temple God inhabits; true philosophy seeks the purifying virtues by reason, not mere habit.
- 276Ascetic self-control practised without wisdom is not true temperance, for the virtues imply one another and serve the mind's ascent.
- 277The ascetics make continence an end in itself; for the philosopher the virtues are only purifications preparing the soul, which is not itself the good.
- 278Virtue only restores the soul to its middle state; to reach the good it must also ascend through mind toward God.
- 279The virtues are like the alphabet for reading, a first step; ascetics who rest content with purity are blameless, but some go further foolishly.
- 280Some uneducated ascetics, scorning learning, spin absurd and malicious doctrines; Synesius addresses them directly.
- 281Synesius tells the unlearned ascetics that, lacking the genius of an Antony, they should either keep to the traditional teachings or be educated.
- 282Holding right opinion without reasons is a respectable middle state; those who seek the reasons need training, or they will fall into folly.
- 283Even Socrates nearly went astray; theologians cannot spring up overnight; truth demands a long course of education.
- 284Initiation into wisdom comes by stages; late learning is no shame, but the unlearned ascetics add to ignorance the pretence of knowledge.
- 285Teaching before learning, the unlearned produce monstrous doctrines that tear the divine apart; like Icarus they lose both earth and sky.
- 286Synesius's rebuke applies equally to boastful Greeks; he honours the poets, orators and historians who nurture the young toward the Muses.
- 287The Muses refresh the weary philosopher and send him back to the contest; even one who loves only their outward beauty does no harm.
- 288The cultured man is a swan, the philosopher an eagle; God lets a man be both, joining eloquence and philosophy.
- 289Synesius calls his essay a game written in freedom for his son, not a timed speech for a court.
- 290Synesius, free of courts and audiences, pities the sophist who must please a crowd and becomes a public slave.
- 291The sophist lives in fear of his audience's every look, after nights of toil and anxious preparation for a single performance.
- 292The sophist's care for his voice wins him only mockery; Synesius sings for himself, to the trees and the stream.
- 293Free of clocks, pupils and fixed lectures, Synesius speaks as long as he likes; teaching would have cost him his freedom and his judgment.
- 294Teachers who must lecture daily produce only barren or premature work and lose the ability to think a problem through.
- 295A teacher answers to pupils and parents alike, a worse theatre than the sophist's; Synesius prefers free company and listening to better men.
- 296A teacher must be envious of rivals and so cannot improve; Socrates, by contrast, learned from sophists and sent the rich young to them.
- 297Socrates let the young treat him as an equal, bore Clitophon's criticism, and humoured Phaedrus with a speech.
- 298Socrates was cheerful though despised, even by Xanthippe; free of opinion's tyranny, he could move from a playful speech to a hymn of the divine.
- 299Socrates rose from play to the highest vision before Phaedrus; Synesius likewise plays and is serious for his promised son.
- 300Synesius wants his son to be both eloquent and wise, like Socrates, who learned the art of the funeral speech from Aspasia.
- 301Socrates wrote poetry in prison at the god's command; Apollo himself is a poet, so those who despise poetry rank below Apollo.
- 302Synesius prays that his son be grounded in literature before meeting its enemies; he leaves him few lands and slaves but many books.
- 303Synesius cites the Pythagorean rule against altering books as his reason for leaving Dio's text uncorrected.
- 304The Pythagorean argument begins: best is a mind born already active and gifted, and some such have lived.
- 305Most minds are only potential and are roused by books; the reader should rely less on the letter as he grows and supply gaps himself.
- 306Supplying what is missing in faulty books trains the mind, as eagles teach their young to fly by letting them go and catching them.
- 307Synesius often anticipates what an author will say next and finds he has matched the thought and even the words.
- 308Reading aloud, Synesius once filled gaps so well that the audience applauded the author for his additions.
- 309Steeped in reading, Synesius can continue tragedies and comedies in each author's own manner.
- 310In all his imitations Synesius's own voice sounds through, like a drone string beneath a melody.