Against Celsus 4.91
Summary: Homer's own omen stories, of a snake devouring sparrows and an eagle wounded by a snake, show that the animals themselves foresee nothing; on the poet's view a god sends the sign.
Greek text · Koetschau 1:363–365
Ἀλλὰ καὶ εἴπερ οἰωνοὶ οἰωνοῖς μάχονται (καὶ, ) ὥς φησιν ὁ Κέλσος, θείαν φύσιν ἔχοντες οἱ μαντικοὶ ὄρνεις καὶ τὰ (ἄλλα) ἄλογα ζῷα καὶ ἐννοίας τοῦ θείου καὶ πρόγνωσιν περὶ μελλόντων τὰ τοιαῦτα ἑτέροις προεδήλουν· οὔτʼ ἂν ἡ καθʼ Ὅμηρον στρουθὸς ἐνόσσευσεν ὅπου δράκων ἔμελλεν αὐτὴν καὶ τὰ τέκνα ἀφανίσειν, οὔτʼ ἂν ὁ κατὰ τὸν αὐτὸν ποιητὴν δράκων οὐκ ἐφυλάξατο ὑπὸ τοῦ ἀετοῦ ληφθῆναι. φησὶ γὰρ ὁ ἐν ποιήσει θαυμαστὸς Ὅμηρος περὶ μὲν τοῦ προτέρου τοιαῦτα· ἔνθʼ ἐφάνη μέγα σῆμα· δράκων ἐπὶ νῶτα δαφοινὸς, σμερδαλέος, τὸν δʼ αὐτὸς Ὀλύμπιος ἧκε φόωσδε, βωμοῦ ὑπαΐξας πρός ῥα πλατάνιστον ὄρουσεν. ἔνθα δʼ ἔσαν στρουθοῖο νεοσσοὶ, νήπια τέκνα, ὄζῳ ἐπʼ ἀκροτάτῳ πετάλοις ὑποπεπτηῶτες, ὀκτὼ. ἀτὰρ μήτηρ ἐνάτη ἦν. ἣ τέκε τέκνα. ἔνθʼ ὅ γε τοὺς ἐλεεινὰ κατήσθιε τετριγῶτας· μήτηρ δʼ ἀμφεποτᾶτο ὀδυρομένη φίλα τέκνα· τὴν δʼ ἐλελιξάμενος πτέρυγος λάβεν ἀμφιαχυῖαν. αὐτὰρ ἐπεὶ κατὰ τέκνʼ ἔφαγε στρουθοῖο καὶ αὐτὴν, τὸν μὲν ἀρίζηλον θῆκεν θεὸς, ὅσπερ ἔφηνεν· λᾶαν γάρ μιν θῆκε Κρόνου παῖς ἀγκυλομήτεω. ἡμεῖς δʼ ἑσταότες θαυμάζομεν οἷον ἐτύχθη. ὡς οὖν δεινὰ πέλωρα θεῶν εἰσῆλθʼ ἑκατόμβας, περὶ δὲ τοῦ δευτέρου ὅτι ὄρνις γάρ σφιν ἐπῆλθε περησέμεναι μεμαῶσιν, αἰετὸς ὑψιπέτης, ἐπʼ ἀριστερὰ λαὸν ἐέργων, φοινήεντα δράκοντα φέρων ὀνύχεσσι πέλωρον, ζωὸν. ἔτʼ ἀσπαίροντα· ὁ δʼ οὔπω λήθετο χάρμης. κόψε γὰρ αὐτὸν ἔχοντα κατὰ στῆθος παρὰ δειρὴν, ἰδνωθεὶς ὀπίσω· ὁ δʼ ἀπὸ ἕθεν ἧκε χαμᾶζε. ἀλγήσας ὀδύνῃσι, μέσῳ δʼ ἐγκάββαλʼ ὁμίλῳ· αὐτὸς δὲ κλάγξας πέτετο πνοιῇς ἀνέμοιο. Τρῶες δʼ ἐῤῥίγησαν, ὅπως ἴδον αἰόλον ὄφιν κείμενον ἐν μέσσοισι, Διὸς τέρας αἰγιόχοιο. ἆρʼ οὖν ὁ μὲν ἀετὸς ἦν μαντικὸς, ὁ δὲ δράκων, ἐπεὶ καὶ τούτῳ χρῶνται τῷ ζῴῳ οἱ οἰωνοσκόποι, οὐκ ἦν μαντικός; τί δὲ, ἐπεὶ τὸ ἀποκληρωτικὸν εὐέλεγκτόν ἐστιν, οὐχὶ καὶ τὸ ἀμφοτέρους εἶναι μαντικοὺς ἐλεγχθείη ἄν; οὐκ ἂν γὰρ ὁ δράκων ὢν μαντικὸς οὐκ ἐφυλάξατο τάδε τινὰ ἀπὸ τοῦ ἀετοῦ παθεῖν; καὶ ἄλλα δʼ ἂν μυρία τοιαῦτα εὕροι τις παραδείγματα, παριστάντα ὅτι οὐ τὰ ζῷα μέν ἐστιν ἐν ἑαυτοῖς ἔχοντα μαντικὴν ψυχήν· ἀλλὰ κατὰ μὲν τὸν ποιητὴν καὶ τοὺς πολλοὺς τῶν ἀνθρώπων αὐτὸς Ὀλύμπιος ἧκε φόωσδε, κατὰ δέ τι σημεῖον καὶ Ἀπόλλων ἀγγέλῳ χρῆται ἱέρακι· „κίρκος“ (γὰρ) „Ἀπόλλωνος“ εἶναι λέγεται „ταχὺς ἄγγελος.“
English · Claude translation
Moreover, if omen-birds fight omen-birds, and if, as Celsus says, the prophetic birds and the other irrational animals, having a divine nature and notions of the divine and foreknowledge of the future, foretold such things to others, then neither would Homer's sparrow have nested where a serpent was going to destroy her and her young, nor would the serpent in the same poet have failed to guard against being seized by the eagle. For Homer, admirable in poetry, says this about the first: "Then a great sign appeared: a serpent, blood-red on its back, terrible, whom the Olympian himself sent into the light, darting from beneath the altar, rushed to the plane tree. There were the young of a sparrow, tender nestlings, on the topmost bough, cowering beneath the leaves, eight of them, and the mother that bore the young was the ninth. There he devoured them as they cheeped piteously, while the mother fluttered round, lamenting her dear young; but he coiled himself and seized her by the wing as she shrieked. But when he had eaten the sparrow's young and herself, the god who had shown him made him conspicuous: the son of crooked-counselling Cronus turned him to stone. And we stood and marvelled at what had happened. So the dread portents of the gods came in among the hecatombs." And about the second: "For a bird came upon them as they were eager to cross, a high-flying eagle, skirting the host on the left, carrying in its talons a blood-red serpent, monstrous, alive and still writhing; and it had not yet forgotten the fight. For it struck the eagle that held it on the breast beside the neck, bending itself back; and the eagle, stung with pain, let it fall from him to the ground and dropped it in the midst of the throng, and itself, with a cry, flew off on the blasts of the wind. And the Trojans shuddered when they saw the gleaming snake lying in their midst, a portent of Zeus who bears the aegis." Was the eagle, then, prophetic, and the serpent, since augurs use this animal too, not prophetic? And since it is easy to refute the choice of one over the other, would not the claim that both are prophetic be refuted too? For would the serpent, if it were prophetic, not have guarded against suffering this from the eagle? And one could find countless other such examples showing that it is not the animals that have a prophetic soul in themselves; rather, according to the poet and most people, "the Olympian himself sent it into the light," and for a certain sign Apollo too uses a hawk as messenger; for "the falcon" is said to be "Apollo's swift messenger."
About this passage
Notes
Translation notes
- The quotations are Homer, Iliad 2.308–320, Iliad 12.200–209, and Odyssey 15.526. The parentheses (καὶ), (ἄλλα), and (γὰρ) are the editor's supplements.
Cite this passage
Origen, Cels. 4.91 (trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-celsum/4/91/).
Plain text
Origen, Cels. 4.91 (trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/origen-celsum/4/91/).
Download citation:BibTeX ·RIS (Zotero, EndNote)
Whole work:BibTeX ·RIS ·Markdown text