Second Apology 2

Summary: A Christian wife who divorced her dissolute husband is denounced by him; her teacher Ptolemaeus and two others are executed under Urbicus simply for confessing the name of Christ.

Show

Greek text · Rauschen, 116–120

Γυνή τις συνεβίου ἀνδρὶ ἀκολασταίνοντι, ἀκολασταίνουσα καὶ αὐτὴ πρότερον. Ἐπεὶ δὲ τὰ τοῦ Χριστοῦ διδάγματα ἔγνω, αὐτὴ ἐσωφρονίσθη καὶ τὸν ἄνδρα ὁμοίως σωφρονεῖν πείθειν ἐπειρᾶτο, τὰ διδάγματα ἀναφέρουσα, τήν τε μέλλουσαν τοῖς οὐ σωφρόνως καὶ μετὰ λόγου ὀρθοῦ βιοῦσιν ἔσεσθαι ἐν αἰωνίῳ πυρὶ κόλασιν ἀπαγγέλλουσα. Ὁ δὲ ταῖς αὐταῖς ἀσελγείαις ἐπιμένων ἀλλοτρίαν διὰ τῶν πράξεων ἐποιεῖτο τὴν γαμετήν. Ἀσεβὲς γὰρ ἡγουμένη τὸ λοιπὸν ἡ γυνὴ συγκατακλίνεσθαι ἀνδρί, παρὰ τὸν τῆς φύσεως νόμον καὶ παρὰ τὸ δίκαιον πόρους ἡδονῆς ἐκ παντὸς πειρωμένῳ ποιεῖσθαι, τῆς συζυγίας χωρισθῆναι ἐβουλήθη. Καὶ ἐπεὶ ἐξεδυσωπεῖτο ὑπὸ τῶν αὐτῆς, ἔτι προσμένειν συμβουλευόντων, ὡς εἰς ἐλπίδα μεταβολῆς ἥξοντός ποτε τοῦ ἀνδρός, βιαζομένη ἑαυτὴν ἐπέμενεν. Ἐπειδὴ δὲ ὁ ταύτης ἀνὴρ εἰς τὴν Ἀλεξάνδρειαν πορευθεὶς χαλεπώτερα πράττειν ἀπηγγέλθη, ὅπως μὴ κοινωνὸς τῶν ἀδικημάτων καὶ ἀσεβημάτων γένηται μένουσα ἐν τῇ συζυγίᾳ καὶ ὁμοδίαιτος καὶ ὁμόκοιτος γινομένη, τὸ λεγόμενον παρʼ ὑμῖν ῥεπούδιον δοῦσα ἐχωρίσθη. Ὁ δὲ καλὸς κἀγαθὸς ταύτης ἀνήρ, δέον αὐτὸν χαίρειν, ὅτι, ἃ πάλαι μετὰ τῶν ὑπηρετῶν καὶ τῶν μισθοφόρων εὐχερῶς ἔπραττε, μέθαις χαίρουσα καὶ κακίᾳ πάσῃ, τούτων μὲν τῶν πράξεων πέπαυτο καὶ αὐτὸν τὰ αὐτὰ παύσασθαι πράττοντα ἐβούλετο, μὴ βουλομένου ἀπαλλαγείσης κατηγορίαν πεποίηται, λέγων αὐτὴν Χριστιανὴν εἶναι. Καὶ ἡ μὲν βιβλίδιόν σοι τῷ αὐτοκράτορι ἀναδέδωκε, πρότερον συγχωρηθῆναι αὐτῇ διοικήσασθαι τὰ ἑαυτῆς ἀξιοῦσα, ἔπειτα ἀπολογήσασθαι περὶ τοῦ κατηγορήματος μετὰ τὴν τῶν πραγμάτων αὐτῆς διοίκησιν, καὶ συνεχώρησας τοῦτο. Ὁ δὲ ταύτης ποτὲ ἀνήρ, πρὸς ἐκείνην μὲν μὴ δυνάμενος τανῦν ἔτι λέγειν, πρὸς Πτολεμαῖόν τινα, ὃν Οὔρβικος ἐκαλέσατο, διδάσκαλον ἐκείνης τῶν Χριστιανῶν μαθημάτων γενόμενον ἐτράπετο διὰ τοῦδε τοῦ τρόπου. Ἑκατόνταρχον εἰς δεσμὰ ἐμβαλόντα τὸν Πτολεμαῖον, φίλον αὐτῷ ὑπάρχοντα, ἔπεισε λαβέσθαι τοῦ Πτολεμαίου καὶ ἀνερωτῆσαι, εἰ, αὐτὸ τοῦτο μόνον, Χριστιανός ἐστι. Καὶ τὸν Πτολεμαῖον, φιλαλήθη ἀλλʼ οὐκ ἀπατηλὸν οὐδὲ ψευδολόγον τὴν γνώμην ὄντα, ὁμολογήσαντα ἑαυτὸν εἶναι Χριστιανόν, ἐν δεσμοῖς γενέσθαι ὁ ἑκατόνταρχος πεποίηκε, καὶ ἐπὶ πολὺν χρόνον ἐν τῷ δεσμωτηρίῳ ἐκολάσατο. Τελευταῖον δέ, ὅτε ἐπὶ Οὔρβικον ἤχθη ὁ ἄνθρωπος, ὁμοίως αὐτὸ τοῦτο μόνον ἐξητάσθη, εἰ εἴη Χριστιανός. Καὶ πάλιν, τὰ καλὰ ἑαυτῷ συνεπιστάμενος διὰ τὴν ἀπὸ τοῦ Χριστοῦ διδαχήν, τὸ διδασκάλιον τῆς θείας ἀρετῆς ὡμολόγησεν. Ὁ γὰρ ἀρνούμενος ὁτιοῦν ἢ κατεγνωκὼς τοῦ πράγματος ἔξαρνος γίνεται, ἢ ἑαυτὸν ἀνάξιον ἐπιστάμενος καὶ ἀλλότριον τοῦ πράγματος τὴν ὁμολογίαν φεύγει· ὧν οὐδὲν πρόσεστι τῷ ἀληθινῷ Χριστιανῷ. Καὶ τοῦ Οὐρβίκου κελεύσαντος αὐτὸν ἀπαχθῆναι, Λούκιός τις, καὶ αὐτὸς ὢν Χριστιανός, ὁρῶν τὴν ἀλόγως οὕτω γενομένην κρίσιν, πρὸς τὸν Οὔρβικον ἔφη· Τίς ἡ αἰτία, τοῦ μήτε μοιχὸν μήτε πόρνον μήτε ἀνδροφόνον μήτε λωποδύτην μήτε ἅρπαγα μήτε ἁπλῶς ἀδίκημά τι πράξαντα ἐλεγχόμενον, ὀνόματος δὲ Χριστιανοῦ προσωνυμίαν ὁμολογοῦντα τὸν ἄνθρωπον τοῦτον ἐκολάσω; Οὐ πρέποντα Εὐσεβεῖ αὐτοκράτορι οὐδὲ φιλοσόφῳ Καίσαρος παιδὶ οὐδὲ τῇ ἱερᾷ συγκλήτῳ κρίνεις, ὦ Οὔρβικε. Καὶ ὃς οὐδὲν ἄλλο ἀποκρινάμενος καὶ πρὸς τὸν Λούκιον ἔφη· Δοκεῖς μοι καὶ σὺ εἶναι τοιοῦτος. Καὶ τοῦ Λουκίου φήσαντος· Μάλιστα, πάλιν καὶ αὐτὸν ἀπαχθῆναι ἐκέλευσεν. Ὁ δὲ καὶ χάριν εἰδέναι ὡμολόγει, πονηρῶν δεσποτῶν τῶν τοιούτων ἀπηλλάχθαι γινώσκων καὶ πρὸς τὸν πατέρα καὶ βασιλέα τῶν οὐρανῶν πορεύεσθαι. Καὶ ἄλλος δὲ τρίτος ἐπελθὼν κολασθῆναι προσετιμήθη.

English · Claude translation

A certain woman lived with a husband who was licentious, and she herself had formerly been licentious. But when she came to know the teachings of Christ, she became self-controlled, and tried to persuade her husband likewise to be self-controlled, repeating the teachings and telling him of the punishment in eternal fire that will come on those who do not live with self-control and according to right reason. But he, continuing in the same debauchery, made his wife an enemy by his actions. For the woman, thinking it ungodly from then on to share the bed of a husband who sought every means of pleasure contrary to the law of nature and contrary to what is right, wished to be separated from the marriage. And when she was pressed by her family, who advised her to stay a while longer, in hope that her husband would some day change, she forced herself and stayed. But when her husband went to Alexandria and was reported to be behaving still worse, so that she might not become a partner in his wrongs and impieties by remaining in the marriage and sharing his table and his bed, she gave him what you call a repudium and was separated. But her fine and noble husband, who ought to have rejoiced that she had given up the things she once readily did with the servants and hired men, delighting in drunkenness and every vice, and wished him too to give them up, since she had left him against his will, brought an accusation against her, saying that she was a Christian. And she presented a petition to you, the emperor, asking first to be allowed to settle her affairs, and then to answer the accusation after settling them; and you granted this. And her former husband, since he could no longer say anything against her for the present, turned against a certain Ptolemaeus, whom Urbicus summoned, and who had been her teacher in the Christian teachings, in the following way. A centurion who had thrown Ptolemaeus into prison was his friend, and he persuaded him to take hold of Ptolemaeus and ask him this alone: whether he was a Christian. And Ptolemaeus, being a lover of truth and not deceitful or false in mind, confessed that he was a Christian, and the centurion had him put in chains and punished him for a long time in the prison. At last, when the man was brought before Urbicus, he was likewise asked this alone: whether he was a Christian. And again, conscious of the good he owed to the teaching of Christ, he confessed the school of divine virtue. For whoever denies anything either denies it because he condemns the thing, or avoids confessing it because he knows himself unworthy of it and a stranger to it; neither of which is true of the true Christian. And when Urbicus ordered him to be led away, a certain Lucius, who was also a Christian, seeing the judgment given so unreasonably, said to Urbicus: “What is the reason that you have punished this man, who is not convicted of being an adulterer, or a fornicator, or a murderer, or a clothes-thief, or a robber, or of any crime at all, but who confesses that he bears the name of Christian? You do not judge, Urbicus, in a way befitting the emperor called Pius, or the philosopher, Caesar's son, or the sacred senate.” And he, without answering anything else, said to Lucius, “You too seem to me to be one of them.” And when Lucius said, “Certainly,” he ordered him too to be led away. And he professed his thanks, knowing that he was being set free from such wicked masters and was going to the Father and King of the heavens. And a third man came forward and was also sentenced to be punished.

About this passage

Source
Rauschen, 116–120 · Gerhard Rauschen, ed., S. Iustini Apologiae duae, Florilegium Patristicum 2 (Bonn: Hanstein, 1911), 114–136 · Greek text: G. Rauschen, S. Iustini Apologiae duae (Florilegium Patristicum 2, 1911), digitized by the Perseus Digital Library and published by the First Thousand Years of Greek project (Open Greek and Latin), CC BY-SA 4.0
Translation
Claude translation (claude-opus-5-5), 2026-09-26 · Translated by Claude from the Greek text of Rauschen (Florilegium Patristicum 2, 1911); made independently of existing English translations.
Scripture
Topics
Marriage, Divorce, Persecution, Martyrdom

Notes

Translation notes

  • The earliest surviving account of a Christian woman seeking divorce. She first stays on her family's advice, and separates only when her husband's conduct grows worse; the repudium was the formal Roman notice of divorce. Justin reports and approves her action; he does not say whether she could remarry.
  • “Contrary to the law of nature”: the phrase suggests sexual practices she considered unnatural; Justin does not specify.
  • “Shares his table and his bed” (ὁμοδίαιτος καὶ ὁμόκοιτος): living and sleeping together as husband and wife.
  • “Pius”: the emperor Antoninus Pius; “the philosopher, Caesar's son”: probably Marcus Aurelius (some texts read “the philosopher, Caesar's son” of Lucius Verus).
  • “Whom Urbicus summoned” (ἐκαλέσατο) is the reading of this text; many editions, followed by ANF, read ἐκολάσατο, “whom Urbicus punished.”

Notes on the original text

  • Digital text corrected (digitization slip against Rauschen's printed text (missing accent); digitization slip against Rauschen's printed text (wrong breathing and accent); digitization slip against Rauschen's printed text (wrong breathing)): ὑπο τῶν αὐτῆς → ὑπὸ τῶν αὐτῆς; ὡς εῖς ἐλπίδα → ὡς εἰς ἐλπίδα; ὦν οὐδὲν πρόσεστι → ὧν οὐδὲν πρόσεστι.

Cite this passage

Justin, 2 Apol. 2 (trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/justin-2-apology/2/).

Plain text
Justin, 2 Apol. 2 (trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/justin-2-apology/2/).

Download citation:BibTeX ·RIS (Zotero, EndNote)

Whole work:BibTeX ·RIS ·Markdown text

Report an error in this passage