Letters 108.29–112.1
Latin text: Hilberg, CSEL 54–56 (Latin text: Isidor Hilberg (CSEL 54–56, 1910–1918), digitized by Open Greek and Latin, University of Leipzig (csel-dev), CC BY-SA 4.0).English: Claude (claude-opus-5-5), public domain (CC0). Compare: Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, series 2, vol. 6 (1893).
Chapter 108
108.29CSEL 55:348
Exhinc non ululatus et planctus, ut inter saeculi homines fieri solet, sed psalmos monachorum diuersis linguis examina concrepabant. translataque episcoporum manibus — (ualidioribus) et ceruicem feretro subicientibus —, cum alii pontifices lampadas cereosque praeferrent, alii choros psallentium ducerent, in media ecclesia speluncae saluatoris est posita. tota ad funus eius Palaestinarum urbium turba conuenit. quem monachorum latentium in heremo cellula sua tenuit? quam uirginum cubiculorum secreta texerunt? sacrilegium putabat, qui non tali feminae ultimum reddidisset officium. uiduae et pauperes in exemplum Dorcadis uestes ab ea praebitas ostendebant; omnis inopum multitudo matrem et nutriciam se perdidisse clamabant. quodque mirum sit, nihil pallor mutarat in facie, sed ita dignitas quaedam et grauitas ora conpleuerat, ut eam putares non mortuam, sed dormientem. Graeco, Latino Svroque sermone psalmi in ordine personabant, non solum triduo et donec subter ecclesiam et iuxta specum domini conderetur, sed per omnem ebdomadem cunctis, qui uenerant, suum funus et proprias credentibus lacrimas. uenerabilis uirgo filia eius Eustochium quasi ablactata super matrem suam abstrahi a parente non poterat: deosculari oculos, haerere uultui, totum corpus amplexari et se cum matre uelle sepeliri.
From then on there was no wailing and beating of breasts, as is usual among people of the world, but swarms of monks resounded with psalms in different languages. She was carried by the hands of bishops, the (stronger) of them putting their shoulders under the bier, while other bishops carried lamps and candles before her and others led the choirs of singers, and she was laid in the middle of the church of the Saviour's cave. The whole crowd of the cities of Palestine came to her funeral. What monk hidden in the desert did his cell hold back? What virgin did the privacy of her chamber keep? He thought it a sacrilege who had not paid the last duty to such a woman. Widows and poor people, after the example of Dorcas, showed the garments she had given them; the whole multitude of the needy cried out that they had lost their mother and nurse. And, what is wonderful, pallor had not changed her face at all, but such dignity and gravity had filled her features that you would think her not dead but asleep. Psalms resounded in order in Greek, Latin, and Syriac, not only for three days until she was laid beneath the church beside the Lord's cave, but for the whole week, all who had come believing it their own funeral and their own tears. The venerable virgin, her daughter Eustochium, like a child weaned from its mother, could not be drawn away from her parent: she kissed her eyes, clung to her face, embraced her whole body, and wished to be buried with her mother.
Acts 9:39 (allusion, high confidence) · Ps 131:2 (130:2 LXX) (echo, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Paula's funeral was a triumph of psalmody in three languages: bishops carried her bier, crowds from all Palestine attended, the poor mourned their mother, and she was buried beside the cave of the Nativity.
- '(Stronger)' renders the editor's supplement 'ualidioribus'.
Cite (SBL): Jerome, Ep. 108.29 (CSEL 55:348; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/jerome-epistulae/108-29/#p-108-29).
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-jerome-epistulae-108-29) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Hilberg's Latin text (CSEL 54–56, 1910–1918); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 6 translation (Fremantle, 1893) where it translates a letter in full, and otherwise re-read against the Latin.
108.30CSEL 55:348–349
Testis est Iesus ne unum quidem nummum ab ea filiae derelictum, sed, ut ante iam dixi, derelictum magnum aes alienum et- quod his difficilius est — fratrum et sororum inmensam multitudinem, quos et sustentare arduum et abicere inpium est. quid hac 25 uirtute mirabilius: feminam nobilissimae familiae, magnis quondam opibus tanta fide omnia delargitam, ut ad egestatem paene ultimam perueniret? iactent alii pecunias, in corban dei aera congesta funalibusque aureis dona. pendentia: nemo plus dedit pauperibus, quam quae sibi nihil reliquit. nunc illa diuitiis fruitur et his bonis, quae nec oculus uidit nec auris audiuit nec in cor hominis ascenderunt. nos nostram uicem dolemus et inuidere potius gloriae eius uidebimur, si uoluerimus diutius flere regnantem.
Jesus is witness that not a single coin was left by her to her daughter, but, as I said before, a great debt, and, what is harder than this, an immense multitude of brothers and sisters, whom it is difficult to support and impious to cast off. What could be more wonderful than this virtue: that a woman of a most noble family, once of great wealth, gave everything away with such faith that she came almost to the last degree of poverty? Let others boast of money, of coins heaped into God's treasury, and of gifts hanging by golden cords: no one gave more to the poor than she who left nothing for herself. Now she enjoys the riches and the good things that eye has not seen, nor ear heard, nor have entered into the heart of man. We grieve for our own loss, and we shall seem rather to envy her glory if we choose to weep longer for one who reigns.
Mark 7:11 (allusion, medium confidence) · Matt 27:6 (allusion, medium confidence) · 1 Cor 2:9 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Paula left Eustochium nothing but debts and a great community to support, having given all to the poor; now she enjoys heavenly riches, and further mourning would seem to begrudge her glory.
- A stray '25' in the digital text is not translated. 'God's treasury' renders 'corban'.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR: a for u): nec auris audiait → nec auris audiuit.
Topics: Ethics
Cite (SBL): Jerome, Ep. 108.30 (CSEL 55:348–349; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/jerome-epistulae/108-29/#p-108-30).
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-jerome-epistulae-108-30) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Hilberg's Latin text (CSEL 54–56, 1910–1918); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 6 translation (Fremantle, 1893) where it translates a letter in full, and otherwise re-read against the Latin.
108.31CSEL 55:349–350
Secura esto, Eustochium; magna hereditate ditata es. pars tua dominus et, quo magis gaudeas, mater tua longo martyrio coronata est. non solum effusio sanguinis in confessione reputatur, sed deuotae quoque mentis seruitus cotidianum martyrium est. illa corona de rosis et uiolis plectitur, ista de liliis. unde et in Cantico scribitur canticorum: fratruelis meus candidus et rubicundus, et in pace et in bello eadem praemia uincentibus tribuens. mater, inquam, tua audiuit cum Abraham: exi de terra tua et de cognatione tua et ueni in terram, quam ostendam tibi, et per Hieremiam dominum praecipientem: fugite de medio Babylonis et saluate animas uestras et usque ad diem mortis suae non est reuersa Chaldaeam nec ollas Aegypti et iurulentias carnium desiderauit, sed choris comitata uirgineis ciuis est saluatoris effecta et de paruula Bethlem caelestia regna conscendens dicit ad ueram jNoemi:populus tuus populus meus et deus tuus deus meus.
Be at ease, Eustochium: you have been enriched with a great inheritance. 'The Lord is your portion'; and, that you may rejoice the more, your mother has been crowned with a long martyrdom. Not only the shedding of blood in confession is counted, but the service of a devoted mind is also a daily martyrdom. That crown is woven of roses and violets, this of lilies. Hence it is written in the Song of Songs, 'My beloved is white and ruddy,' giving the same rewards to the victors in peace and in war. Your mother, I say, heard with Abraham, 'Go out from your land and from your kindred, and come into the land which I will show you,' and the Lord commanding through Jeremiah, 'Flee from the midst of Babylon and save your souls'; and to the day of her death she did not return to Chaldea, nor did she long for the fleshpots of Egypt and their savoury meats; but, accompanied by choirs of virgins, she became a fellow citizen of the Saviour, and, ascending from little Bethlehem to the heavenly kingdom, she says to the true Naomi: 'Your people are my people, and your God my God.'
Ps 73:26 (72:26 LXX) (allusion, medium confidence) · Song 5:10 (quotation, high confidence) · Gen 12:1 (quotation, high confidence) · Jer 51:6 (28:6 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Exod 16:3 (allusion, high confidence) · Ruth 1:16 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Jerome consoles Eustochium: her mother, who like Abraham left her homeland and never looked back, has won the crown of a lifelong 'white' martyrdom.
- The contrast of red martyrdom (roses, blood) and white (lilies, ascetic life) is traditional. The 'true Naomi' is Christ or the church, in Jerome's figurative use of Ruth 1:16.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR: i for t): cotidianum martyrium esi. → cotidianum martyrium est..
Topics: Martyrdom
Cite (SBL): Jerome, Ep. 108.31 (CSEL 55:349–350; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/jerome-epistulae/108-29/#p-108-31).
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-jerome-epistulae-108-31) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Hilberg's Latin text (CSEL 54–56, 1910–1918); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 6 translation (Fremantle, 1893) where it translates a letter in full, and otherwise re-read against the Latin.
108.32CSEL 55:350
Hunc tibi librum ad duas lucubratiunculas eodem, quem tu sustines, dolore dictaui. nam quotienscumque stilum figere uolui et opus exarare promissum, totiens obriguerunt digiti, cecidit manus, sensus elanguit. unde et inculta oratio uotum scribentis absque ulla elegantia et uerborum lepore testatur.
I have dictated this book for you in two short night-sittings, with the same grief that you bear. For as often as I tried to fix my pen and write out the promised work, so often my fingers stiffened, my hand fell, my mind grew faint. Hence the unpolished style bears witness to the writer's wish, without any elegance or charm of words.
Notes and citation
Summary: Jerome apologizes that grief allowed him only two nights' dictation and an unpolished style.
Cite (SBL): Jerome, Ep. 108.32 (CSEL 55:350; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/jerome-epistulae/108-29/#p-108-32).
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-jerome-epistulae-108-32) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Hilberg's Latin text (CSEL 54–56, 1910–1918); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 6 translation (Fremantle, 1893) where it translates a letter in full, and otherwise re-read against the Latin.
108.33CSEL 55:350–351
Uale, Paula, et cultoris tui ultimam senectutem orationibus iuua. fides et opera tua Christo te sociant, praesens facilius, quod postulas, inpetrabis. exegi monumentum aere perennius, quod nulla destruere possit uetustas. incidi elogium sepulchro tuo, quod huic uolumini subdidi, ut, quocumque noster sermo peruenerit, te laudatam, te in Bethlem conditam lector agnoscat. Titulus sepulchri: Scipio quam genuit, Pauli fudere parentes, Gracchorum suboles, Agamemnonis inclita proles hoc iacet in tumulo, Paulam dixere priores. Eustochiae genetrix, Romani prima senatus pauperiem Christi et Bethlemitica rura secuta est. Et in foribus speluncae: Despicis angustum praecisa rupe sepulchrum? hospitium Paulae est caelestia regna tenentis. fratrem, cognatos, Romam patriamque relinquens, diuitias, subolem Bethlemitico conditur antro. hic praesepe tuum, Christe, atque hic mystica reges munera portantes hominique deoque dedere.
Farewell, Paula, and help by your prayers the extreme old age of your admirer. Your faith and works join you to Christ; being in his presence, you will more easily obtain what you ask. 'I have completed a monument more lasting than bronze,' which no length of time can destroy. I have carved an inscription on your tomb, which I have added to this volume, so that wherever our writing reaches, the reader may know that you are praised and that you are buried in Bethlehem. The inscription on the tomb: 'She whom Scipio begot, whom the family of Paulus bore, offspring of the Gracchi, renowned descendant of Agamemnon, lies in this tomb; her forebears called her Paula. Mother of Eustochium, first of the Roman senate, she followed the poverty of Christ and the fields of Bethlehem.' And on the door of the cave: 'Do you see a narrow tomb cut in the rock? It is the lodging of Paula, who holds the heavenly kingdom. Leaving brother, kinsfolk, Rome and homeland, riches and offspring, she is laid in the cave of Bethlehem. Here was your manger, O Christ, and here the kings, bearing mystic gifts, gave them to man and God.'
Matt 2:11 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Jerome bids Paula farewell, asks her prayers, and records the two verse inscriptions he composed for her tomb.
- 'I have completed a monument more lasting than bronze' is Horace, Odes 3.30.1.
Extrabiblical texts: Horace, Carm. 3.30.1 (Horace; quotation)
Cite (SBL): Jerome, Ep. 108.33 (CSEL 55:350–351; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/jerome-epistulae/108-29/#p-108-33).
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-jerome-epistulae-108-33) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Hilberg's Latin text (CSEL 54–56, 1910–1918); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 6 translation (Fremantle, 1893) where it translates a letter in full, and otherwise re-read against the Latin.
108.34CSEL 55:351
Dormiuit sancta et beata Paula septimo Kalendas Februarias, tertia sabbati post solis occubitum. sepulta est quinto Kalendarum earundem Honorio Augusto VI et Aristaeneto consulibus. uixit in sancto proposito Romae annis quinque, Bethleem annis uiginti. omne uitae tempus inpleuit annis quinquaginta sex, mensibus octo, diebus uiginti uno.
The holy and blessed Paula fell asleep on the seventh day before the Kalends of February, on the third day of the week, after sunset. She was buried on the fifth day before the same Kalends, in the consulship of Honorius Augustus for the sixth time and Aristaenetus. She lived in her holy resolve five years at Rome and twenty years at Bethlehem. The whole time of her life was fifty-six years, eight months, and twenty-one days.
Notes and citation
Summary: Paula died on 26 January 404 and was buried on 28 January, aged fifty-six, having lived the ascetic life five years at Rome and twenty at Bethlehem.
- The dates correspond to Tuesday 26 January and Thursday 28 January 404.
Cite (SBL): Jerome, Ep. 108.34 (CSEL 55:351; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/jerome-epistulae/108-29/#p-108-34).
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-jerome-epistulae-108-34) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Hilberg's Latin text (CSEL 54–56, 1910–1918); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 6 translation (Fremantle, 1893) where it translates a letter in full, and otherwise re-read against the Latin.
Chapter 109
109.1CSEL 55:351–353
Acceptis litteris tuis primitus non respondere superbiae est, respondere temeritatis. de his enim rebus interrogas, quae et proferre et audire sacrilegium est. ais Uigilantium, qui κατὰ ἀντίφρασιν hoc uocatur nomine — nam Dormitantius rectius diceretur — os fetidum rursus aperire et putorem spurcissimum contra sanctorum martyrum proferre reliquias et nos, qui eas suscipimus, appellare cinerarios et idolatras, qui mortuorum hominum ossa ueneremur. o infelicem hominem et omni lacrimarum fonte plangendum, qui haec dicens non se intellegit esse Samaritam et Iudaeum, qui corpora mortuorum pro inmundis habent et etiam uasa, quae in eadem domo fuerint, pollui suspicantur sequentes occidentem litteram et non spiritum uiuificantem. nos autem non dico martyrum reliquias, sed ne solem quidem et lunam, non angelos, non archangelos, non seraphim, non cherubim et omne nomen, quod nominatur et in praesenti saeculo et in futuro, colimus et adoramus, ne seruiamus creaturae potius quam creatori, qui est benedictus in saecula. honoramus autem reliquias martyrum, ut eum, cuius sunt martyres, adoremus, honoramus seruos, ut honor seruorum redundet ad dominum, qui ait: qui uos suscipit, me suscipit. ergo Petri et Pauli inmundae sunt reliquiae? ergo Moysi corpusculum inmundum erit, quod iuxta Hebraicam ueritatem ab ipso sepultum est domino? et quotienscumque apostolorum et prophetarum et omnium martyrum basilicas ingredimur, totiens idolorum templa ueneramur accensique ante tumulos eorum cerei idolatriae insignia sunt? plus aliquid dicam, quod redundet in auctoris caput et insanum cerebrum uel sanet aliquando uel deleat, ne tantis sacrilegiis simplicum animae subuertantur. ergo et domini corpus in sepulchro positum inmundum fuit et angeli, qui candidis uestibus utebantur, mortuo cadaueri atque polluto praebebant excubias, ut post multa saecula Dormitantius somniaret, immo eructuaret inmundissimam crapulam et cum Iuliano, persecutore sanctorum, basilicas aut destrueret aut in templa conuerteret?
Having received your letter, not to answer it would be pride, and to answer it would be rashness; for you ask about matters that it is sacrilege both to speak of and to hear. You say that Vigilantius (who is called by this name by contraries, for he would more rightly be called Dormitantius, "the Sleeper") is again opening his fetid mouth and pouring out a most filthy stench against the relics of the holy martyrs, and that he calls us who receive them "ash-worshipers" and idolaters, because we venerate the bones of dead men. O unhappy man, to be lamented with every fountain of tears! In saying this he does not understand that he is a Samaritan and a Jew, who regard the bodies of the dead as unclean and suspect that even the vessels that were in the same house are defiled, following the letter that kills and not the Spirit that gives life. We, for our part, do not worship and adore—I do not say the relics of the martyrs—but not even the sun and the moon, not angels, not archangels, not seraphim, not cherubim, "and every name that is named both in the present age and in the one to come," lest we "serve the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever." But we honor the relics of the martyrs so that we may adore him whose martyrs they are; we honor the servants so that the honor of the servants may redound to the Lord, who says: "Whoever receives you receives me." Are the relics of Peter and Paul, then, unclean? Will the little body of Moses be unclean, which, according to the Hebrew original, was buried by the Lord himself? And every time we enter the basilicas of the apostles, the prophets, and all the martyrs, are we venerating temples of idols, and are the candles lit before their tombs the emblems of idolatry? I will say something more, which may recoil upon its author's head and either heal that insane brain at last or destroy it, so that the souls of the simple are not overturned by such sacrileges. Was the Lord's body too, then, unclean when it was laid in the tomb, and were the angels clothed in white garments keeping watch over a dead and defiled corpse, so that many ages later the Sleeper might dream—or rather belch up his most unclean drunkenness—and, with Julian, the persecutor of the saints, either destroy the basilicas or turn them into temples?
2 Cor 3:6 (allusion, high confidence) · Eph 1:21 (quotation, high confidence) · Rom 1:25 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 10:40 (quotation, high confidence) · Deut 34:6 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 28:3 (allusion, medium confidence) · Num 19:14 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Jerome answers Riparius that Vigilantius wrongly calls the veneration of martyrs' relics idolatry: Christians honor the relics in order to adore Christ, and dead saints' bodies are not unclean.
- Vigilantius, a presbyter of Aquitaine (see Letter 61), opposed the veneration of relics and the night vigils; Jerome plays on his name ("Wakeful") and calls him Dormitantius ("Sleeper"). Jerome's polemic is translated as written. The Greek κατὰ ἀντίφρασιν means "by contraries." Moses' burial by the Lord follows the Hebrew of Deut 34:6 ("he buried him"). Julian is the emperor Julian (361–363).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR misreading in the digital text): cinerarios ex idolatras → cinerarios et idolatras; redundet m auctoris → redundet in auctoris; cadaueii atque pollute → cadaueri atque polluto.
Cite (SBL): Jerome, Ep. 109.1 (CSEL 55:351–353; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/jerome-epistulae/108-29/#p-109-1).
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-jerome-epistulae-109-1) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Hilberg's Latin text (CSEL 54–56, 1910–1918); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 6 translation (Fremantle, 1893) where it translates a letter in full, and otherwise re-read against the Latin.
109.2CSEL 55:353–354
Miror sanctum episcopum, in cuius parrochia esse presbyter dicitur, adquiescere furori eius et non uirga apostolica uirgaque ferrea confringere uas inutile et tradere in interitum carnis, ut spiritus saluus fiat. meminerit illius dicti: uidebas furem et concurrebas cum eo et cum adulteris portionem tuam ponebas. et in alio loco: in matutino interficiebam omnes peccatores terrae, ut disperderem de ciuitate domini omnes operantes iniquitatem, et iterum: nonne odientes te, domine, odio habui et super inimicos tuos tabescebam? perfecto odio oderam illos. si non sunt honorandae reliquiae martyrum, quomodo legimus: pretiosa in conspectu domini mors sanctorum eius? si ossa eorum polluunt contingentes, quomodo Heliseus mortuus mortuum suscitauit et dedit uitam, quod iuxta Uigilantium iacebat inmundum? ergo omnia castra Israhelitici exercitus et populi dei fuere inmunda, quia Ioseph et patriarcharum corpora portabant in solitudine et ad sanctam terram inmundos cineres retulerunt? Ioseph quoque in typo praecedens domini et saluatoris nostri sceleratus fuit, quia tanta ambitione Iacob in Chebron ossa portauit, ut inmundum patrem auo et atauo sociaret inmundis et mortuum mortuis copularet? praecidenda lingua a medicis, immo insanum curandum caput. ut, loqui qui nescit, discat aliquando reticere. ego, ego uidi hoc aliquando portentum et testimoniis scripturarum quasi uinculis Hippocratis uolui ligare furiosum, sed abiit, excessit, euasit, erupit et inter Adriae fluctus Cottiique regis Alpes in nos declamando clamauit. quidquid enim amens loquitur, uociferatio et clamor est appellandus.
I am amazed that the holy bishop in whose diocese he is said to be a presbyter tolerates his madness, and does not, with the apostolic rod and a rod of iron, break the useless vessel and hand him over for the destruction of the flesh, so that the spirit may be saved. Let him remember the saying: "You saw a thief and ran along with him, and you cast your lot with adulterers"; and in another place: "In the morning I put to death all the sinners of the land, to destroy from the city of the Lord all who work iniquity"; and again: "Did I not hate those who hate you, Lord, and pine away over your enemies? I hated them with a perfect hatred." If the relics of the martyrs are not to be honored, how is it that we read: "Precious in the sight of the Lord is the death of his saints"? If their bones defile those who touch them, how did the dead Elisha raise a dead man and give life—he who, according to Vigilantius, lay unclean? Were the whole camp of the Israelite army and the people of God unclean, then, because they carried the bodies of Joseph and the patriarchs in the wilderness and brought unclean ashes back to the holy land? Was Joseph too, who went before as a type of our Lord and Savior, a wicked man, because with such great ceremony he carried Jacob's bones to Hebron, to join his unclean father to an unclean grandfather and great-grandfather and unite a dead man with the dead? His tongue should be cut out by physicians—or rather his insane head cured—so that he who does not know how to speak may learn at last to keep silent. I, I myself once saw this monster, and I tried to bind the madman with the testimonies of Scripture as with the bonds of Hippocrates; but he went away, departed, escaped, broke out, and between the waves of the Adriatic and the Alps of King Cottius he cried out in declamation against us. For whatever a madman says must be called bawling and clamor.
Ps 2:9 (allusion, medium confidence) · 2 Tim 2:21 (allusion, low confidence) · 1 Cor 5:5 (allusion, high confidence) · Ps 50:18 (49:18 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 101:8 (100:8 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 139:21 (138:21 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 139:22 (138:22 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 116:15 (115:6 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Kgs 13:21 (allusion, high confidence) · Exod 13:19 (allusion, high confidence) · Josh 24:32 (allusion, medium confidence) · Gen 50:13 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Jerome urges Vigilantius's bishop to discipline him and argues from Scripture that the bodies of the saints are honored, not unclean.
- Jerome's call for discipline is translated as written. The Psalm quotations follow the Latin Psalter. "He went away, departed, escaped, broke out" is Cicero's phrase about Catiline (In Catilinam 2.1). "The bonds of Hippocrates" refers to the restraint of the insane. The Alps of King Cottius are the Cottian Alps; Vigilantius's home region lay in Gaul.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (word split in the digital text): uide bas furem et con currebas → uidebas furem et concurrebas; conspectu d omini → conspectu domini.
Extrabiblical texts: Cicero, Cat. 2.1 (Cicero; quotation)
Topics: Church office
Cite (SBL): Jerome, Ep. 109.2 (CSEL 55:353–354; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/jerome-epistulae/108-29/#p-109-2).
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-jerome-epistulae-109-2) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Hilberg's Latin text (CSEL 54–56, 1910–1918); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 6 translation (Fremantle, 1893) where it translates a letter in full, and otherwise re-read against the Latin.
109.3CSEL 55:354–355
Tacita me forsitan cogitatione reprehendas, cur in absentem inuehar. fateor tibi dolorem meum: sacrilegium tantum patienter audire non possum. legi enim siromasten Finees, austeritatem Heliae, zelum Simonis Chananaei, Petri seueritatem Ananiam et Sapphiram trucidantis Paulique constantiam, qui Elymam magum uiis domini resistentem aeterna caecitate damnauit. non est crudelitas pro deo pietas. unde et in lege dicitur: si frater tuus et amicus et uxor, quae est in sinu tuo, deprauare te uoluerit a ueritate, sit manus tua super eos et effundes sanguinem eorum et auferes malum de medio Israhel. iterum dicam: ergo martyrum inmundae sunt reliquiae? et quid passi sunt apostoli, ut inmundum Stephani corpus tanta funeris ambitione praecederent et facerent ent ei planctum magnum, ut illorum luctus in nostrum gaudium uerteretur? nam quod dicis eum uigilias execrari, facit et hoc contra uocabulum suum, ut uelit dormire Uigilantius et non audiat saluatorem dicentem: sic non potuistis una hora uigilare mecum? uigilate et orate, ut non intretis in temptationem. spiritus promptus, sed caro infirma. et in alio loco propheta decantat: media nocte surgebam, ut confiterer tibi super iudicia iustitiae tuae. dominum quoque in euangelio legimus pernoctasse et apostolos clausos carcere tota nocte uigilasse, ut illis psallentibus terra quateretur, custos carceris crederet, magistratus et ciuitas terrerentur. loquitur Paulus: orationi insistite uigilantes in ea et in alio loco: in uigiliis frequenter. dormiat itaque Uigilantius et ab exterminatore Aegypti cum Aegyptiis dormiens suffocetur; nos dicamus cum Dauid: non dormitabit neque obdormiet, qui custodit Israhel, ut ueniat ad nos sanctus et Hir, qui interpretatur uigil. et si quando propter, peccata nostra dormierit, dicamus ad eum: exsurge, ut quid dormitas, domine? excitemusque illum et nauicula fluctuante clamemus: magister, saluos nos fac, perimus.
Perhaps in your silent thoughts you blame me for inveighing against an absent man. I confess my grief to you: I cannot patiently listen to such sacrilege. For I have read of the javelin of Phinehas, the sternness of Elijah, the zeal of Simon the Cananaean, the severity of Peter striking down Ananias and Sapphira, and the constancy of Paul, who condemned Elymas the sorcerer, as he resisted the ways of the Lord, to lasting blindness. Devotion for God's sake is not cruelty. Hence it is said in the Law too: "If your brother and friend and the wife who is in your bosom wishes to turn you aside from the truth, let your hand be upon them, and you shall shed their blood and remove the evil from the midst of Israel." I will say it again: are the relics of the martyrs unclean, then? And what came over the apostles, that they went before the unclean body of Stephen in so great a funeral procession and made great lamentation over him, so that their mourning might be turned into our joy? As for your saying that he execrates vigils, in this too he acts against his own name: Vigilantius, "the Wakeful," wants to sleep, and does not hear the Savior saying: "So could you not watch one hour with me? Watch and pray, that you may not enter into temptation; the spirit is willing, but the flesh is weak." And in another place the prophet sings: "At midnight I rose to give thanks to you for the judgments of your righteousness." We read too in the Gospel that the Lord spent the night in prayer, and that the apostles, shut up in prison, kept watch the whole night, so that while they sang psalms the earth was shaken, the jailer believed, and the magistrates and the city were terrified. Paul says: "Persevere in prayer, keeping watch in it," and in another place: "in watchings often." So let Vigilantius sleep, and be smothered in his sleep by the destroyer of Egypt along with the Egyptians. Let us say with David: "He who keeps Israel will not slumber or sleep," so that the holy one and the "Ir," which means "watcher," may come to us. And if ever for our sins he sleeps, let us say to him: "Awake! Why do you sleep, Lord?" Let us rouse him, and as the little boat is tossed let us cry: "Master, save us, we are perishing."
Num 25:7 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Kgs 18:40 (allusion, medium confidence) · Luke 6:15 (allusion, medium confidence) · Acts 5:1 (allusion, high confidence) · Acts 13:8 (allusion, high confidence) · Acts 13:11 (allusion, high confidence) · Deut 13:6 (quotation, high confidence) · Deut 13:9 (quotation, medium confidence) · Deut 13:5 (allusion, medium confidence) · Acts 8:2 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 26:40 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 26:41 (quotation, high confidence) · Ps 119:62 (118:62 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Luke 6:12 (allusion, high confidence) · Acts 16:25 (allusion, high confidence) · Acts 16:26 (allusion, high confidence) · Col 4:2 (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Cor 11:27 (quotation, high confidence) · Exod 12:23 (allusion, medium confidence) · Ps 121:4 (120:4 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Dan 4:13 (allusion, high confidence) · Ps 44:23 (43:24 LXX) (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 8:25 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Jerome defends his zeal by biblical examples, and defends the night vigils from Christ's command to watch and the practice of the prophets and apostles.
- The command from Deut 13:6–9 is quoted as Jerome adapts it. "Ir" is the Hebrew/Aramaic word for "watcher" in Dan 4:13 (4:10 in the Vulgate), "a watcher and a holy one." The digital text marks a doubled syllable ("facerent ent") as printed; it is not translated. "Could you not watch" follows the Latin form of Matt 26:40.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR misreading in the digital text): seueritacem → seueritatem; confite*ei tibi → confiterer tibi; donniat itaque → dormiat itaque.
Topics: Prayer
Cite (SBL): Jerome, Ep. 109.3 (CSEL 55:354–355; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/jerome-epistulae/108-29/#p-109-3).
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-jerome-epistulae-109-3) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Hilberg's Latin text (CSEL 54–56, 1910–1918); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 6 translation (Fremantle, 1893) where it translates a letter in full, and otherwise re-read against the Latin.
109.4CSEL 55:355–356
Plura dictare uolueram, si non epistolaris breuitas pudorem nobis tacendi inponeret et si tu librorum ipsius ad nos uoluisses mittere cantilenas, ut scire possemus, ad quae rescribere deberemus. nunc autem aerem uerberauimus et non tam illius infidelitatem, quae omnibus patet, quam nostram fidem aperuimus. ceterum, si uolueris longiorem nos aduersum eum librum scribere, mitte nenias illius et ineptias, ut Iohannem Baptistam audiat praedicantem: iam securis ad radices arborum posita est. omnis arbor, quae non facit fructum bonum, excidetur et in ignem mittetur.
I would have dictated more, if the brevity proper to a letter did not impose on me the modesty of silence, and if you had been willing to send us the songs of his books, so that we might know what we ought to answer. As it is, we have beaten the air, and have laid open not so much his unbelief, which is plain to all, as our own faith. But if you want us to write a longer book against him, send us his dirges and nonsense, so that he may hear John the Baptist preaching: "The axe is already laid at the root of the trees. Every tree that does not bear good fruit will be cut down and thrown into the fire."
1 Cor 9:26 (allusion, high confidence) · Matt 3:10 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Jerome offers to write a full refutation of Vigilantius if Riparius sends him his books.
- Jerome did later write Against Vigilantius (406).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR misreading in the digital text; stray mark or line number in the digital text): deberemus. I nunc → deberemus. nunc; infidelitatem. I quae → infidelitatem, quae; nemas illius → nenias illius.
Cite (SBL): Jerome, Ep. 109.4 (CSEL 55:355–356; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/jerome-epistulae/108-29/#p-109-4).
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-jerome-epistulae-109-4) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Hilberg's Latin text (CSEL 54–56, 1910–1918); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 6 translation (Fremantle, 1893) where it translates a letter in full, and otherwise re-read against the Latin.
Chapter 110
110.1CSEL 55:356–358
Quamuis existimem, antequam istas sumeres, uenisse in manus tuas litteras meas, quas per dei seruum, filium nostrum Cyprianum diaconum misi quibus certissime agnosceres meam esse epistulam, cuius exemplaria illuc peruenisse commemorasti — unde iam me arbitror rescriptis tuis uelut Entellinis grandibus atque acribus caestibus tamquam audacem Dareta coepisse pulsari atque uersari —, nunc tamen eis ipsis respondeo litteris tuis, quas mihi per sanctum filium nostrum Asterium mittere dignatus es. in quibus multa in me comperi tuae beniuolentissimae caritatis et rursus quaedam nonnullius a me tuae offensionis indicia. itaque, ubi mulcebar legens, ibi continuo feriebar hoc sane uel maxime admirans, quod, cum te dicas exemplaribus litterarum mearum ideo temere non putasse credendum, ne forte te respondente laesus iuste expostularem, quod probare ante debuisses meum esse sermonem et sic rescribere, postea iubeas, si mea est epistula, aperte me scribere aut mittere exemplaria ueriora, ut absque ullo rancore stomachi in scripturarum disputatione uersemur. quo pacto enim possumus in hac disputatione sine rancore uersari, si me laedere paras? aut, si non paras, quomodo ego te non laedente abs te laesus iuste expostularem, quod probare ante debuisses meum esse sermonem et sic rescribere, hoc est et sic laedere? nisi enim rescribendo laesisses, ego iuste expostulare non possem. proinde, cum ita rescribis, ut laedas, quis locus nobis relinquitur in disputatione scripturarum sine ullo rancore uersandi? ego quidem absit ut laedar, si mihi certa ratione uolueris et potueris demonstrare illud ex epistula apostoli uel quid aliud scripturarum sanctarum te uerius intellexisse quam me; immo uero absit, ut non cum gratiarum actione lucris meis deputem, si fuero te docente instructus aut emendante correctus.
Although I suppose that before you received this letter my letter reached your hands—the one I sent by the servant of God, our son the deacon Cyprian, from which you would learn with complete certainty that the letter was mine of which you mentioned that copies had reached you (and so I think I have already begun to be pummeled and tossed about by your replies, like bold Dares by the great and fierce gauntlets of Entellus)—nevertheless I now answer the very letter you were pleased to send me by our holy son Asterius. In it I found many signs of your most kindly love toward me, and again some signs of some offense at me on your part. So where I was being soothed as I read, there I was at once being struck. I wondered above all at this: that you say you did not think you should rashly trust the copies of my letter, lest, if you answered, I might justly complain of being hurt, because you ought first to have proved that the writing was mine and only then have replied; and yet afterward you bid me, if the letter is mine, to write plainly or send truer copies, so that we may engage in the discussion of the Scriptures without any rancor of spirit. For how can we engage in this discussion without rancor if you are preparing to hurt me? Or if you are not preparing to, how could I justly complain of being hurt by you when you had not hurt me, on the ground that you ought first to have proved the writing mine and then replied—that is, then hurt me? For unless you had hurt me by your reply, I could not justly complain. Therefore, when you write back in such a way as to hurt, what room is left us to engage in the discussion of the Scriptures without any rancor? For my part, far be it from me to be hurt if you are willing and able to show me by sound reasoning that you have understood that passage of the apostle's letter, or any other passage of the holy Scriptures, more truly than I; indeed, far be it from me not to count it gain, with thanksgiving, if I am instructed by your teaching or corrected by your emendation.
Gal 2:11 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Augustine replies to Jerome's letter brought by Asterius, puzzled that Jerome both fears hurting him and seems ready to hurt him, and declares himself glad to be corrected.
- This letter is by Augustine, not Jerome (Augustine, Letter 73, written ca. 404), and is preserved in the collection of Jerome's letters. The "passage of the apostle's letter" is Gal 2:11–14, the dispute between Peter and Paul at Antioch. Entellus and Dares are the boxers of Virgil, Aeneid 5.362–484, whom Jerome had invoked in his Letter 102.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR misreading in the digital text; stray mark or line number in the digital text): nostrum 4 Cyprianum → nostrum Cyprianum; instructas aut emendante → instructus aut emendante.
Extrabiblical texts: Virgil, Aen. 5.362-484 (Virgil; allusion)
Topics: Scripture and canon
Cite (SBL): Jerome, Ep. 110.1 (CSEL 55:356–358; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/jerome-epistulae/108-29/#p-110-1).
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-jerome-epistulae-110-1) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Hilberg's Latin text (CSEL 54–56, 1910–1918); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 6 translation (Fremantle, 1893) where it translates a letter in full, and otherwise re-read against the Latin.
110.2CSEL 55:358
Uerum tamen tu, mi frater carissime, nisi te putares laesum scriptis meis, non me putares laedi posse rescriptis tuis. nullo enim modo id de te opinatus fuero, quod non te arbitrans laesum sic tamen rescribis, ut laedas. aut si te non sic rescribente ego propter nimiam stultitiam meam laedi posse putatus sum, hoc ipso laesisti plane, quod de me ita sensisti. sed nullo modo tu me, quem numquam talem expertus es, temere talem crederes, qui litterarum mearum exemplaribus etiam, cum stilum meum nosses, temere credere noluisti. si enim non inmerito uidisti me iuste expostulaturum fuisse, si temere crederes esse litteras meas, quae non essent meae, quanto iustius expostularem me ipsum temere putatum talem, qualem me non nosset, qui putauisset! nequaquam ergo ita prolabereris, ut te non rescribente, quo laederer, me tamen existimares nimis insipientem etiam tali tuo rescripto laedi potuisse.
Yet you, my dearest brother, would not think that I could be hurt by your replies unless you thought yourself hurt by my writings. For I could in no way suppose of you that, not thinking yourself hurt, you nevertheless write back in such a way as to hurt. Or if, though you did not write in that way, I was thought capable of being hurt through my own excessive foolishness, then by this very thing you have plainly hurt me, that you thought such a thing of me. But you would by no means rashly believe me to be such a person, when you have never found me so—you who were unwilling rashly to believe even the copies of my letter, although you knew my style. For if you saw, not without reason, that I would justly have complained had you rashly believed a letter to be mine that was not mine, how much more justly would I complain that I myself had been rashly thought to be such a man as he who thought it did not know me to be! You would never, then, slip so far as to think me so foolish that I could be hurt even by such a reply of yours, if you had not written anything to hurt me.
Notes and citation
Summary: Augustine reasons that Jerome would not expect him to be hurt unless Jerome himself felt hurt, and would not think him so foolish without cause.
- This letter is by Augustine, not Jerome (Augustine, Letter 73, written ca. 404), and is preserved in the collection of Jerome's letters.
Cite (SBL): Jerome, Ep. 110.2 (CSEL 55:358; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/jerome-epistulae/108-29/#p-110-2).
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-jerome-epistulae-110-2) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Hilberg's Latin text (CSEL 54–56, 1910–1918); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 6 translation (Fremantle, 1893) where it translates a letter in full, and otherwise re-read against the Latin.
110.3CSEL 55:358–359
Restat igitur, ut laedere me rescribendo disponeres, si certo documento meas esse illas litteras nosses. atque ita, quia non credo, quod iniuste me laedendum putares, superest, ut agnoscam peccatum meum, quod prior te illis litteris laeserim, quas meas esse negare non possum. cur itaque conor contra fluminis tractum ac non potius ueniam peto? obsecro ergo te per mansuetudinem Christi, ut, si laesi te, dimittas mihi nec me uicissim laedendo malum pro malo reddas. laedes autem me; si mihi tacueris errorem meum, quem forte inueneris in factis uel dictis meis. nam si ea in me reprehenderis, quae reprehendenda non sunt, te laedis magis quam me — quod absit a moribus et sancto proposito tuo, ut hoc facias uoluntate laedendi culpans in me aliquid dente maledico. quod mente ueridica scis non esse culpandum — ac per hoc aut beniuolo corde argues, etiam si caret delicto, quod arguendum putas, aut paterno affectu mulceas, quem abicere nequeas. potest enim fieri, ut tibi aliud uideatur, quam ueritas habet, dum tamen abs te aliud non fiat, quam caritas habet. et ego amicissimam reprehensionem gratissime accipiam, etiam si reprehendi non meruit, quod recte defendi potest, aut agnoscam simul et beniuolentiam tuam et culpam meam et, quantum dominus donat, in alio gratus, in alio emendatus inueniar.
It remains, then, that you intended to hurt me by your reply if you knew by sure proof that the letter was mine. And so, since I do not believe you would think I ought to be hurt unjustly, it remains for me to acknowledge my sin, that I first hurt you by that letter which I cannot deny is mine. Why then do I strive against the current of the stream, and do not rather ask pardon? I beseech you, therefore, by the gentleness of Christ, that if I have hurt you, you forgive me, and do not in turn repay evil for evil by hurting me. But you will hurt me if you keep silent to me about an error of mine that you may happen to find in my deeds or words. For if you rebuke in me things that are not to be rebuked, you hurt yourself more than me. Far be it from your character and holy purpose to do this with the will to hurt, faulting in me with a slanderous tooth what your truthful mind knows is not to be faulted. Rather, you will either reprove with a kindly heart, even if what you think deserves reproof is free of fault, or you will soothe with a father's affection one whom you cannot cast off. For it can happen that something seems to you other than the truth holds, provided only that you do nothing other than love holds. And I shall receive a most friendly reproof most gratefully, even if what can rightly be defended did not deserve reproof; or else I shall acknowledge both your kindness and my fault, and, as far as the Lord grants, I shall be found grateful in the one case and corrected in the other.
2 Cor 10:1 (allusion, medium confidence) · Rom 12:17 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Augustine acknowledges that his letter gave the first offense, asks Jerome's pardon by the gentleness of Christ, and asks him still to point out his errors in charity.
- This letter is by Augustine, not Jerome (Augustine, Letter 73, written ca. 404), and is preserved in the collection of Jerome's letters.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR misreading in the digital text; stray mark or line number in the digital text): ut ]laedere → ut laedere; si cerato documento → si certo documento; errorem I meum → errorem meum; magis( quam → magis quam.
Cite (SBL): Jerome, Ep. 110.3 (CSEL 55:358–359; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/jerome-epistulae/108-29/#p-110-3).
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-jerome-epistulae-110-3) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Hilberg's Latin text (CSEL 54–56, 1910–1918); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 6 translation (Fremantle, 1893) where it translates a letter in full, and otherwise re-read against the Latin.
110.4CSEL 55:359–360
Quid ergo fortasse dura, sed certe salubria uerba tua tamquam caestus Entelli pertimescam? caedebatur ille, non curabatur, et ideo uincebatur, non sanabatur. ego autem, si medicinalem correptionem tuam tranquillus accepero, non dolebo. si uero infirmitas uel humana uel mea, etiam cum ueraciter arguor, non potest nisi aliquantulum contristari, melius tumor capitis dolet, cum curatur, quam, dum ei parcitur, non sanatur. hoc est enim, quod acute uidit, qui dixit utiliores esse plerumque inimicos iurgantes quam amicos obiurgare metuentes. illi enim, dum rixantur, dicunt aliquando uera, quae corrigamus; isti autem minorem, quam oportet, exhibent iustitiae libertatem, dum amicitiae timent exasperare dulcedinem. quapropter etsi bos, ut tibi uideris, lassus senectute forte corporis, non uigore animi tamen, in area dominica fructuoso labore desudans, ecce sum: si quid perperam dixi, fortius fige pedem. non mihi esse debet molestum pondus aetatis tuae, dum conteratur palea culpae meae.
Why then should I dread your words, harsh perhaps but certainly wholesome, like the gauntlets of Entellus? He was beaten, not treated; and so he was defeated, not healed. But if I receive your medicinal correction calmly, I shall not be pained. And if weakness, whether human or my own, cannot help being somewhat saddened even when I am truly reproved, it is better for a swelling on the head to hurt while it is treated than, while it is spared, not to be healed. This is what was keenly seen by the man who said that quarrelsome enemies are often more useful than friends who are afraid to rebuke. For the former, while they wrangle, sometimes say true things that we may correct; but the latter show less freedom than justice requires, while they fear to embitter the sweetness of friendship. Therefore, though you are an ox, as you think yourself, tired perhaps with the old age of the body but not in vigor of mind, still sweating with fruitful labor on the Lord's threshing floor—here I am: if I have said anything amiss, plant your foot more firmly. The weight of your years ought not to trouble me, so long as the chaff of my fault is trampled out.
Deut 25:4 (allusion, low confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Augustine welcomes Jerome's correction as medicine and invites him, as the tired ox on the Lord's threshing floor, to tread firmly on his faults.
- This letter is by Augustine, not Jerome (Augustine, Letter 73, written ca. 404), and is preserved in the collection of Jerome's letters. The saying about enemies and friends is Cicero, De amicitia 24.90 (quoting Cato). "The weary ox plants its foot more firmly" was Jerome's proverb in Letter 102.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (stray mark or line number in the digital text): aliquando 20 uera → aliquando uera; dulcedinem. 1 quapropter → dulcedinem. quapropter.
Extrabiblical texts: Cicero, Amic. 90 (Cicero; allusion)
Cite (SBL): Jerome, Ep. 110.4 (CSEL 55:359–360; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/jerome-epistulae/108-29/#p-110-4).
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-jerome-epistulae-110-4) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Hilberg's Latin text (CSEL 54–56, 1910–1918); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 6 translation (Fremantle, 1893) where it translates a letter in full, and otherwise re-read against the Latin.
110.5CSEL 55:360–361
Proinde illud, quod in extremo epistulae tuae posuisti, cum magni desiderii suspirio uel lego uel recolo. utinam, inquis, mereremur complexus tuos et conlatione mutua uel doceremus aliqua uel disceremus! ego autem dico: utinam saltem propinquis terrarum locis habitaremus, ut, si non possunt misceri nostra conloquia, litterae possent esse crebriores! nunc uero tanto locorum interuallo absumus a sensibus nostris, ut de illis uerbis apostoli ad Galatas iuuenem me ad tuam sanctitatem scripsisse meminerim et ecce iam senex nondum rescripta meruerim faciliusque ad te exemplaria epistulae meae peruenerint nescio qua occasione praeueniente quam ipsa epistula me curante. homo enim, qui eam tunc acceperat, nec ad te pertulit nec ad me retulit. tantae mihi autem in litteris tuis, quae in manus nostras uenire potuerunt, apparent litterae, ut nihil studiorum meorum mallem, si possem, quam inhaerere lateri tuo. quod ego quia non possum, aliquem nostrorum in domino filiorum erudiendum nobis ad te mittere cogito; si etiam de hac re tua rescripta meruero. nam neque in me tantum scientiae scripturarum diuinarum est aut esse iam poterit, quantum inesse tibi uideo, et, si quid in hac re habeo facultatis, utcumque inpendo populo dei. uacare autem studiosis diligentius, quam populi audiunt, instruendis propter ecclesiasticas occupationes omnino non possum.
And so what you put at the end of your letter I read, or recall, with a sigh of great longing. "Would that we might deserve," you say, "your embraces, and by mutual conversation might either teach or learn something!" But I say: would that we at least lived in neighboring lands, so that, if our conversations cannot be mingled, our letters might be more frequent! As it is, we are so far apart in space, so far from each other's perception, that I remember writing to your holiness about those words of the apostle to the Galatians when I was young, and see, I am already old and have not yet earned a reply; and copies of my letter reached you by some chance or other sooner than the letter itself, which I had taken care to send. For the man who had received it then neither delivered it to you nor brought it back to me. And such learning appears in your letters that have been able to come into our hands, that there is nothing I would rather do with my studies, if I could, than cling to your side. Because I cannot, I am thinking of sending one of our sons in the Lord to you to be taught, if I receive your reply on this matter too. For there is not in me so much knowledge of the divine Scriptures as I see in you, nor can there be now; and whatever ability I have in this matter I spend as best I can on the people of God. But because of my church duties I simply cannot give time to instructing students more thoroughly than the people are taught.
Gal 2:11 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Augustine echoes Jerome's wish to meet, laments the distance and the lost letter, and proposes sending a student to Jerome.
- This letter is by Augustine, not Jerome (Augustine, Letter 73, written ca. 404), and is preserved in the collection of Jerome's letters. "Those words of the apostle to the Galatians": Gal 2:11–14, on which Augustine had first written to Jerome about ten years earlier (Letter 56 in Jerome's collection).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR misreading in the digital text): locorum mterualio absumus → locorum interuallo absumus.
Cite (SBL): Jerome, Ep. 110.5 (CSEL 55:360–361; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/jerome-epistulae/108-29/#p-110-5).
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-jerome-epistulae-110-5) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Hilberg's Latin text (CSEL 54–56, 1910–1918); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 6 translation (Fremantle, 1893) where it translates a letter in full, and otherwise re-read against the Latin.
110.6CSEL 55:361–362
Nescio qua scripta maledica super tuo nomine ad Africam peruenisse nescimus. accepimus tamen, quod dignatus es mittere illis respondens maledictis. quo perlecto, fateor, multum dolui inter tam caras familiaresque personas cunctis paene ecclesiis notissimo amicitiae uinculo copulatas tantum malum extitisse discordiae. et tu quidem quantum tibi modereris quantumque teneas aculeos indignationis tuae, ne reddas maledictum pro maledicto, satis in tuis litteris eminet. uerum tamen, si, eas ipsas cum legissem, contabui dolore et obrigui timore, quid de me illa facerent, quae in te scripsit, si in manus meas forte uenissent? uae mundo ab scandalis! ecce fit, ecce prorsus inpletur, quod ueritas ait: quoniam abundabit iniquitas, refrigescet caritas multorum. quae sibi enim iam fida pectora tuto refundantur? in cuius sensus tota se proiciat secura dilectio? quis denique amicus non formidetur quasi futurus inimicus, si potuit inter Hieronymum et Rufinum hoc, quod plangimus, exoriri? o misera et miseranda condicio, o infida in uoluntatibus amicorum scientia praesentium, ubi nulla est praescientia futurorum! sed quid hoc alteri de altero gemendum putem, quando ne ipse quidem sibi homo est notus in posterum? nouit enim utcumque — uix forte —, nunc qualis sit; qualis autem postea sit futurus, ignorat.
We did not know that certain slanderous writings against your name had reached Africa. We have received, however, what you were pleased to send in reply to those slanders. When I had read it, I confess, I was greatly pained that so great an evil of discord should have arisen between persons so dear and intimate, bound by a bond of friendship known to almost all the churches. And indeed your letter shows clearly enough how you restrain yourself and hold back the stings of your indignation, so as not to return abuse for abuse. Yet if, when I read even that, I wasted away with grief and froze with fear, what would the things he wrote against you have done to me if they had happened to come into my hands? "Woe to the world because of offenses!" Look, it is happening; look, what the Truth said is being fulfilled completely: "Because iniquity will abound, the love of many will grow cold." For what faithful hearts can now pour themselves safely into one another? Into whose affection can love throw itself wholly without fear? What friend, in short, is not to be dreaded as a future enemy, if what we lament could arise between Jerome and Rufinus? O wretched and pitiable condition! O untrustworthy knowledge of the present wills of friends, where there is no foreknowledge of the future! But why should I think this is something for one to lament about another, when a man is not known even to himself for the time to come? For he knows somehow—perhaps barely—what he is now; but what he will be afterward he does not know.
Rom 12:17 (allusion, low confidence) · 1 Pet 3:9 (allusion, medium confidence) · Matt 18:7 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 24:12 (quotation, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Augustine grieves over the quarrel between Jerome and Rufinus, which shows that no friendship is secure, since no one knows even his own future.
- This letter is by Augustine, not Jerome (Augustine, Letter 73, written ca. 404), and is preserved in the collection of Jerome's letters. The opening clause is awkward in the Latin ("Nescio qua … nescimus"); it is translated by sense. The quarrel is the Origenist controversy between Jerome and Rufinus of Aquileia; Augustine had seen Jerome's Apology against Rufinus.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (stray mark or line number in the digital text): Rufinum V hoc → Rufinum hoc; condicio, 1 o infida → condicio, o infida; nulla I est → nulla est; gemendum W putem → gemendum putem.
Cite (SBL): Jerome, Ep. 110.6 (CSEL 55:361–362; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/jerome-epistulae/108-29/#p-110-6).
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-jerome-epistulae-110-6) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Hilberg's Latin text (CSEL 54–56, 1910–1918); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 6 translation (Fremantle, 1893) where it translates a letter in full, and otherwise re-read against the Latin.
110.7CSEL 55:362
Haec porro non tantum scientia, qualis quisque sit, uerum etiam praescientia, qualis futurus sit, si est in sanctis et beatis angelis, quomodo fuerit diabolus beatus aliquando, cum adhuc angelus bonus esset, sciens futuram iniquitatem suam et sempiternum supplicium, omnino non uideo. de qua re, si tamen eam nosse opus est, uellem audire, quid sentias. uide, quid faciant terrae ac maria, quae nos corporaliter dirimunt. si haec epistula mea, quam legis, ego essem, iam mihi diceres, quod quaesiui; nunc uero quando rescribes? quando mittes? quando perueniet? quando accipiam? et tamen utinam quandoque fiat, quod tam cito fieri non posse, quam uolumus, quanta possumus, tolerantia sustinemus! unde recurro ad illa uerba epistulae tuae dulcissima sanctique desiderii plenissima et ea facio uicissim mea: utinam mereremur complexus tuos et conlatione mutua uel doceremus aliqua uel disceremus, si tamen esse ullo modo posset, quod ego te docerem!
But as for this not only knowledge of what each person is, but also foreknowledge of what he will be—if it exists in the holy and blessed angels, I simply do not see how the devil was ever blessed while he was still a good angel, if he knew his future iniquity and everlasting punishment. On this question, if indeed it needs to be known, I should like to hear what you think. See what lands and seas do, which separate us in body! If this letter of mine that you are reading were I, you would already be telling me what I asked; but as it is, when will you write back? When will you send? When will it arrive? When shall I receive it? And yet would that it might happen sometime—what cannot happen as quickly as we wish, we bear with all the patience we can! So I go back to those most sweet words of your letter, full of holy longing, and I make them mine in turn: "Would that we might deserve your embraces, and by mutual conversation might either teach or learn something"—if indeed it could be in any way that I should teach you!
Notes and citation
Summary: Augustine asks Jerome how the devil could have been blessed if angels foreknow their future, and repeats Jerome's wish to meet.
- This letter is by Augustine, not Jerome (Augustine, Letter 73, written ca. 404), and is preserved in the collection of Jerome's letters.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR misreading in the digital text): ae qua re → de qua re.
Cite (SBL): Jerome, Ep. 110.7 (CSEL 55:362; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/jerome-epistulae/108-29/#p-110-7).
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-jerome-epistulae-110-7) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Hilberg's Latin text (CSEL 54–56, 1910–1918); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 6 translation (Fremantle, 1893) where it translates a letter in full, and otherwise re-read against the Latin.
110.8CSEL 55:362–363
In his autem uerbis non iam tuis tantum, sed etiam meis ubi delector et reficior et ipso quamuis pendente et non adtingente utriusque nostrum desiderio non parua ex parte consolor, ibi rursus acerrimis doloris stimulis fodior, dum cogito inter uos, quibus deus hoc ipsum, quod uterque nostrum optauit, largum prolixumque concesserat, ut coniunctissimi et familiarissimi mella scripturarum sanctarum pariter lamberetis, tantae amaritudinis inrepsisse perniciem quando non, ubi non, cui non homini formidandam, cum eo tempore, quo abiectis iam sarcinis saecularibus iam expediti dominum sequebamini et in ea terra uiuebatis simul, in qua dominus humanis pedibus ambulans: pacem meam, inquit, do uobis, pacem meam relinquo uobis, uiris aetate maturis et in eloquio domini habitantibus uobis accidere potuit. uere temptatio est uita humana super terram. ei mihi, qui uos alicubi simul inuenire non possum! forte, ut moueor, ut doleo, ut timeo, prociderem ad pedes uestros, flerem, quantum ualerem, rogarem, quantum amarem, nunc unumquemque uestrum pro se ipso, nunc utrumque pro alterutro et pro aliis ac maxime infirmis, pro quibus Christus mortuus est, qui uos tamquam in theatro uitae huius cum magno sui periculo spectant, ne de uobis ea conscribendo spargatis, quae quoniam concordantes delere non poteritis, concordare nolitis aut quae concordes legere timeatis, ne iterum litigetis.
But in these words, now not only yours but mine too, where I delight and am refreshed, and am consoled in no small part even while the longing of both of us hangs in suspense and does not attain its goal, there again I am pierced by the sharpest goads of grief, when I think how, between you two—to whom God had granted in large and generous measure the very thing each of us has longed for, that as most closely joined and intimate friends you might lick together the honey of the holy Scriptures—the ruin of such bitterness crept in. When, where, to what man is this not to be feared, if it could happen to you, at the time when, having cast off the baggage of the world and free for the journey, you were following the Lord and living together in that land where the Lord, walking on human feet, said: "My peace I give to you, my peace I leave to you"—to you, men mature in age and dwelling in the word of the Lord? Truly "man's life on earth is a trial." Woe is me, that I cannot find you together somewhere! Perhaps, moved, grieving, and fearing as I am, I would fall at your feet; I would weep as much as I could, plead as much as I love, now each of you for his own sake, now each for the other and for others, especially the weak for whom Christ died, who watch you with great danger to themselves as if in the theater of this life—that you not spread abroad writing such things about each other that, since you will not be able to erase them once reconciled, you would be unwilling to be reconciled, or would be afraid to read them once reconciled, lest you quarrel again.
John 14:27 (quotation, high confidence) · Job 7:1 (quotation, high confidence) · 1 Cor 8:11 (allusion, high confidence) · 1 Cor 4:9 (allusion, medium confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Augustine laments that the bitterness between Jerome and Rufinus arose among friends who had lived together in the Holy Land, and begs them not to publish attacks that would prevent reconciliation.
- This letter is by Augustine, not Jerome (Augustine, Letter 73, written ca. 404), and is preserved in the collection of Jerome's letters.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR misreading in the digital text; word split in the digital text): pacem meam, inquit, d o uobis → pacem meam, inquit, do uobis; concordantes deleie non → concordantes delere non.
Cite (SBL): Jerome, Ep. 110.8 (CSEL 55:362–363; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/jerome-epistulae/108-29/#p-110-8).
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-jerome-epistulae-110-8) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Hilberg's Latin text (CSEL 54–56, 1910–1918); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 6 translation (Fremantle, 1893) where it translates a letter in full, and otherwise re-read against the Latin.
110.9CSEL 55:363–365
Uerum dico caritati tuae nihil me magis quam hoc exemplum tremuisse, cum quaedam ad me in epistula tua legerem tuae indignationis indicia, non tam illa de Entello et de boue lasso, ubi mihi hilariter iocari quam iracunde minari uisus es, quam illud, quod serio te scripsisse satis apparet — unde supra locutus sum plus fortasse; quam debui, sed non plus, quam timui —, ubi aisti: ne forte laesus iuste expostulares. rogo te, si fieri potest, ut inter nos quaeramus et disseramus aliquid, quo sine amaritudine discordiae corda nostra pascantur, fiat; si autem non possum dicere, quid mihi emendandum uideatur in scriptis tuis, nec tu in meis nisi cum suspicione inuidiae aut laesione amicitiae, quiescamus ab his et nostrae uitae salutique parcamus. minus certe adsequatur illa, quae inflat, dum non offendatur illa. quae aedificat. ego me longe esse sentio ab illa perfectione, de qua scriptum est: si quis in uerbo non offendit, hic perfectus est uir. sed plane in dei misericordia puto me posse facile abs te petere ueniam. si quid offendi, quod mihi aperire debes, ut, cum te audiero. lucreris fratrem tuum. neque enim, quia hoc propter longinquitatem terrarum non potes facere inter me et te, propterea debes sinere errare me. prorsus, quod ad ipsas res; quas nosse uolumus, adtinet, si quid ueri me tenere uel scio uel credo uel puto, in quo tu aliter sentis, quantum dat dominus, sine tua iniuria conabor adserere. quod autem pertinet ad offensionem tuam. cum te indignatum sensero, nihil aliud quam ueniam deprecabor.
I tell your charity truly that nothing made me tremble more than this example, when I read in your letter certain signs of your indignation—not so much those about Entellus and the tired ox, where you seemed to me to be joking cheerfully rather than threatening angrily, as that which was plainly written in earnest (on which I spoke above, perhaps more than I should have, but not more than I feared), where you said: "lest perhaps, being hurt, you might justly complain." I ask you, if it is possible for us to inquire and discuss something between us in such a way that our hearts may be fed without the bitterness of discord, let it be so. But if I cannot say what seems to me to need correction in your writings, nor you in mine, without suspicion of envy or injury to friendship, let us rest from these things and spare our life and salvation. Certainly let the knowledge that puffs up gain less, so long as the love that builds up is not offended. I feel myself far from that perfection of which it is written: "If anyone does not stumble in word, he is a perfect man." But surely, by God's mercy, I think I can easily ask pardon from you if I have offended in anything—which you ought to disclose to me, so that when I have heard you, you may gain your brother. Nor, because the distance between our lands keeps you from doing this between you and me alone, ought you therefore to let me go astray. As to the matters themselves that we wish to know, if I know or believe or think that I hold something true on which you think otherwise, I shall try, as far as the Lord gives, to maintain it without injury to you. But as to your offense, when I perceive that you are indignant, I shall do nothing but ask pardon.
1 Cor 8:1 (allusion, high confidence) · Jas 3:2 (quotation, high confidence) · Matt 18:15 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Augustine proposes that they either discuss Scripture without bitterness or stop, and promises to ask pardon whenever Jerome is offended.
- This letter is by Augustine, not Jerome (Augustine, Letter 73, written ca. 404), and is preserved in the collection of Jerome's letters.
Cite (SBL): Jerome, Ep. 110.9 (CSEL 55:363–365; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/jerome-epistulae/108-29/#p-110-9).
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-jerome-epistulae-110-9) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Hilberg's Latin text (CSEL 54–56, 1910–1918); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 6 translation (Fremantle, 1893) where it translates a letter in full, and otherwise re-read against the Latin.
110.10CSEL 55:365–366
Nec omnino arbitror te suscensere potuisse, nisi aut hoc dicerem, quod non debui, aut non sic dicerem, ut debui, quia nec miror minus nos scire inuicem, quam scimur a coniunctissimis et familiarissimis nostris. in quorum ego caritatem, fateor, facile me totum proicio praesertim fatigatum scandalis saeculi et in ea sine ulla sollicitudine requiesco. deum quippe illic esse sentio, in quem me securus proicio et in quo securus requiesco. nec in hac mea securitate crastinum illud humanae fragilitatis incertum, de quo superius gemui, omnino formido. cum enim hominem Christiana caritate flagrantem eaque mihi fidelem amicum factum esse sentio, quicquid ei consiliorum meorum cogitationumque committo, non homini committo, sed illi, in quo manet, ut talis sit. deus enim caritas est et, qui manet in caritate, in deo manet; quem si deseruerit, tantum faciat necesse est dolorem, quantum manens fecerat gaudium. uerum tamen ex amico intimo factus inimicus quaerat sibi potius, quod fingat astutus, non inueniat, quod prodat iratus. hoc autem unusquisque facile adsequitur non occultando, quod fecerit, sed non faciendo, quod occultari uelit. quod misericordia dei bonis piisque concedit, ut inter amicos quoslibet futuros liberi securique uersentur, aliena peccata sibi commissa non prodant, quae prodi timeant, ipsi nulla committant. cum enim falsum quid a maledico fingitur, aut omnino, non creditur aut certe integra salute sola fama uexatur; quod autem male perpetratur, hostis est intimus, etiam si nullius intimi loquacitate aut lite uulgetur. quapropter quis prudentium non uideat, etiam tu quam tolerabiliter feras amicissimi quondam et familiarissimi incredibiles nunc inimicitias consolante conscientia et quem ad modum, uel quod iactitat uel quod a quibusdam forsitan creditur, in sinistris armis deputes, quibus non minus quam dextris contra diabolum dimicatur? uerum tamen illum maluerim aliquo modo mitiorem quam te isto modo armatiorem. hoc magnum et triste miraculum est ex amicitiis talibus ad has inimicitias peruenisse. laetum erit et multo maius ex inimicitiis talibus ad pristinam concordiam reuertisse.
Nor do I think at all that you could have been angry unless I either said what I ought not, or did not say it as I ought; for I do not wonder that we know each other less than we are known by those most closely joined and intimate with us. Into their love, I confess, I easily throw myself wholly, especially when wearied by the offenses of the world, and in it I rest without any anxiety; for I feel that God is there, into whom I throw myself without fear and in whom I rest without fear. Nor in this security of mine do I at all fear that uncertain tomorrow of human frailty over which I groaned above. For when I feel that a man burning with Christian love has become a faithful friend to me through it, whatever of my counsels and thoughts I entrust to him I entrust not to a man but to him in whom he abides, so that he is such a man. For "God is love, and whoever abides in love abides in God"; and if he forsakes it, he must cause as much grief as he caused joy while he abode in it. Yet let one who has turned from an intimate friend into an enemy rather seek something to invent in his cunning, and not find something to betray in his anger. And this each person easily achieves, not by concealing what he has done, but by not doing what he would wish to have concealed. God's mercy grants this to the good and godly: that among any friends whatever they may be in the future, they may move freely and securely, not betraying the sins of others entrusted to them, and themselves committing none that they would fear to have betrayed. For when something false is invented by a slanderer, either it is not believed at all, or at least only one's reputation is troubled while one's salvation stays intact; but what is done wickedly is an enemy within, even if it is not published by the talk or quarrel of any intimate. Therefore what prudent man does not see how bearably you too endure the now incredible enmity of one who was once your dearest and most intimate friend, since your conscience consoles you; and how you count among the weapons on the left hand—whatever he boasts or what perhaps some believe—those with which one fights against the devil no less than with those on the right? Yet I would rather he were in some way gentler than that you were in this way better armed. This is a great and sad wonder, to have passed from such friendships to such enmities; it will be a joyful and much greater one to have returned from such enmities to the former harmony.
1 John 4:16 (quotation, high confidence) · 2 Cor 6:7 (allusion, high confidence)
Notes and citation
Summary: Augustine explains that he rests securely in friendships founded on Christian love, since God is love, and hopes for the reconciliation of Jerome and Rufinus.
- This letter is by Augustine, not Jerome (Augustine, Letter 73, written ca. 404), and is preserved in the collection of Jerome's letters. "Weapons on the left hand" and "on the right" allude to 2 Cor 6:7–8 ("through glory and dishonor, through ill report and good report").
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR misreading in the digital text): securas requiesco → securus requiesco; fidelem amicum factam esse → fidelem amicum factum esse; quod autem malam perpetratur → quod autem male perpetratur.
Cite (SBL): Jerome, Ep. 110.10 (CSEL 55:365–366; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/jerome-epistulae/108-29/#p-110-10).
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-jerome-epistulae-110-10) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Hilberg's Latin text (CSEL 54–56, 1910–1918); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 6 translation (Fremantle, 1893) where it translates a letter in full, and otherwise re-read against the Latin.
Chapter 111
111.1CSEL 55:366–367
Sicut praesens rogaui sinceritatem tuam, nunc quoque commoneo, ut litteras meas sancto fratri et conpresbytero nostro Hieronymo mittere non graueris. ut autem nouerit caritas tua, quem ad modum etiam tu illi pro mea causa scribere debeas, misi exemplaria litterarum et mearum ad ipsum et ad me ipsius. quibus lectis pro tua sancta prudentia facile uidebis et modum meum, quem seruandum putaui, et motum eius, quem non frustra timui. aut si ego, quod non debui, uel, quo modo non debui, aliquid scripsi, non ad illum de me, sed ad me ipsum potius fraterna dilectione mitte sermonem, quo correctus petam, ut ignoscat, si meam culpam ipse cognouero.
As I asked your sincerity when you were here, so now too I remind you: please do not find it a burden to send my letter to our holy brother and fellow presbyter Jerome. And so that your charity may know how you too ought to write to him on my behalf, I have sent copies of the letters, both mine to him and his to me. When you have read them, with your holy prudence you will easily see both the moderation that I thought I should keep and his agitation, which I did not fear without cause. Or if I have written something I ought not, or in a way I ought not, address your word in brotherly love not to him about me, but rather to me myself, so that, corrected by it, I may ask him to forgive me, if I myself recognize my fault.
Notes and citation
Summary: Augustine asks Praesidius to forward his letter to Jerome, sends him copies of their correspondence, and asks to be corrected himself if he has written wrongly.
- This letter is by Augustine, not Jerome (Augustine, Letter 74, to Praesidius, written ca. 404), and is preserved in the collection of Jerome's letters. Praesidius was a bishop, apparently known to both men.
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (stray mark or line number in the digital text): dilectione. mitte sermonem → dilectione mitte sermonem.
Cite (SBL): Jerome, Ep. 111.1 (CSEL 55:366–367; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/jerome-epistulae/108-29/#p-111-1).
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-jerome-epistulae-111-1) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Hilberg's Latin text (CSEL 54–56, 1910–1918); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 6 translation (Fremantle, 1893) where it translates a letter in full, and otherwise re-read against the Latin.
Chapter 112
112.1CSEL 55:367–368
Tres simul epistulas, immo libellos, per diaconum Cyprianum tuae dignationis, accepi diuersas, ut tu nominas, quaestiones, ut ego sentio, reprehensiones meorum opusculorum continentes. ad quas si respondere uoluero, libri magnitudine opus erit. tamen conabor, quantum facere possum, modum non egredi epistulae longioris et festinanti fratri moram non facere, qui ante triduum, quam profecturus erat, a me epistulas flagitauit paene in procinctu haec, qualiacumque sunt, effutire compellar et tumultuario respondere sermone non maturitate scribentis, sed dictantis temeritate, quae plerumque non in doctrinam, sed in casum uertitur, at fortissimos quoque milites subita bella conturbant et ante coguntur fugere, quam possint arma corripere.
I have received through the deacon Cyprian three letters of yours at once—or rather little books—containing various questions, as you call them, but, as I feel, criticisms of my small works. If I wished to answer them, a book's length would be needed. Still I shall try, as far as I can, not to go beyond the measure of a longish letter and not to delay our brother, who is in a hurry: he demanded letters from me three days before he was to set out, so that I am compelled to blurt out these things, such as they are, almost in marching order, and to answer in a hasty style, not with the maturity of one who writes but with the rashness of one who dictates, which usually turns out not as learning but as chance. For sudden wars throw even the bravest soldiers into confusion, and they are forced to flee before they can snatch up their arms.
Notes and citation
Summary: Jerome acknowledges Augustine's three letters and explains that he must answer them hastily, in a letter dictated within three days.
- This is Jerome's reply to Augustine (Augustine, Letter 75, written 404). The three letters are Letters 56, 67, and 104 in Jerome's collection (Augustine, Letters 28, 40, and 71).
Notes on the original text
- Digital text corrected (OCR misreading (n for u); the sense requires 'if I wish to answer'): si respondere noluero → si respondere uoluero.
Cite (SBL): Jerome, Ep. 112.1 (CSEL 55:367–368; trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/jerome-epistulae/108-29/#p-112-1).
BibTeX · RIS (whole work; this passage's key: sophiascriptura-jerome-epistulae-112-1) · Report an error
Translation: Translated by Claude from Hilberg's Latin text (CSEL 54–56, 1910–1918); compared afterwards with the NPNF² 6 translation (Fremantle, 1893) where it translates a letter in full, and otherwise re-read against the Latin.