Church History 1.7.4
Summary: Africanus (quoted): both Gospels are true, because the lines of Solomon and Nathan were intertwined by levirate and second marriages.
Greek text · Dindorf 4:25
οὕτως οὐδέτερον τῶν εὐαγγελίων ψεύδε- “ται, καὶ φύσιν ἀριθμοῦν καὶ νόμον· ἐπεπλάκη γὰρ “ἀλλήλοις τὰ γένη, τό τε ἀπὸ τοῦ Σολομῶνος καὶ τὸ “ἀπὸ τοῦ Νάθαν, ἀναστάσεσιν ἀτέκνων καὶ δευτερο- “γαμίαις καὶ ἀναστάσει σπερμάτων, ὡς δικαίως τοὺς “αὐτοὺς ἄλλοτε ἄλλων νομίζεσθαι, τῶν μὲν δοκούν- “των πατέρων, τῶν δὲ ὑπαρχόντων· ὡς ἀμφοτέρας “τὰς διηγήσεις κυρίως ἀληθεῖς οὔσας ἐπὶ τὸν Ἰωσὴφ “πολυπλόκως μὲν, ἀλλʼ ἀκριβῶς κατελθεῖν.
English · Claude translation
So neither of the Gospels is false, for they reckon both nature and law. For the families descended from Solomon and from Nathan were intertwined with one another by raisings-up of offspring for the childless, by second marriages, and by raising up of seed, so that the same persons are rightly reckoned as belonging now to one, now to another, some to their reputed fathers and some to their actual fathers. Thus both accounts are strictly true, and come down to Joseph in a complicated but accurate way.
About this passage
Notes
Translation notes
- Quotation from Julius Africanus, Letter to Aristides.
Cite this passage
Eusebius, Hist. eccl. 1.7.4 (trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/eusebius-historia/1/7/4/).
Plain text
Eusebius, Hist. eccl. 1.7.4 (trans. Sophia Scriptura, https://sophiascriptura.com/fathers/eusebius-historia/1/7/4/).
Download citation:BibTeX ·RIS (Zotero, EndNote)
Whole work:BibTeX ·RIS ·Markdown text